A few days ago, I started thinking about the motives for the Russian Hoax. Why did it happen? Yesterday, I wrote an article which, at least in my small feeble mind, attempts to explain the parallel interests of the MSM and the Dems. If “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”, then we have a perfect explanation for the love affair between the media and the Dems…., they both made money pushing Muh Russia, even AFTER they knew the Russian hoax was untrue.
Yet, even if we assume everything from yesterday’s article is true, it still doesn’t explain the reaction of the “Deep State” before and after the election. We’ve all worked in positions where “the new manager” comes in, is different or hated, but we keep our opinions to ourselves and muddle through. Why all the leaking from FBI/DOJ/C_A and State Dept? Leaks from the White House staff holdovers. Opposition from every department, Education, EPA, and for heaven’s sake, the Obama holdovers even went after Zinke at Dept of Interior, Price at Dept HHS, and Dr Ben Carson. Even the Ambassadors? Why?
It is statistically impossible for so many people, who were sane on November 7, 2016, to have a mental breakdown on November 9, 2016. Besides, Federal employees are known for doing what is necessary to keep their jobs. Rationally, new Trump Admin officials would need months to even learn their way around Washington, DC. A new Trump boss could have been sabotaged quietly, and easily. Why all the unprecedented public hatred which was actually self-defeating (for themselves and the country)?
No, the Dems were NOT acting like wounded animals, writhing in pain. They were NOT merely sore and dejected by a loss of an election. The Dems were lashing out, with venom and anger to destroy the Trump Admin. They were acting scared…., and as if they were at war……, particularly the intel community.
And then it hit me…… Mike Flynn. Mike Flynn was where it all started. After the election, they went after Flynn, first. And then ALL the light bulbs in my head started going off like a 1978 disco blaring Donna Summer tunes. Watch this 2 minute video of Mike Flynn, calling for a change in the agencies, rooting out corruption, as Martha McCallum was accusing the Trump campaign of Russian Collusion on November 6, 2016. Link here.
The two minutes is STUNNING, in light of the Mueller summary, and will make your jaw drop and your blood run cold.

1. Mike Flynn was lauded as the brightest military intel officer in a generation. He worked from 1981-2014, with our military, C_A, and as a National Security Advisor to Obama.
2. Flynn left the Obama team over the Iran Deal and Flynn was on the inside of the Obama team.
3. Video above, Flynn was on the campaign trail calling for Hillary to “step down”. Besides Trump, it was Flynn going after Hillary about her email problem….., a problem that was whitewashed by the intel community.
4. Again in video, it was Flynn speaking openly about corruption in the agencies, the need to change the behavior, even while Martha McCallum was pushing a “Muh Russia” narrative on November 6th, 2016.
5. Again, in the video, when Martha asks how Flynn would respond to the allegation of Russian collusion, Flynn responds by saying, “I would use my Irish on ya'” – meaning his first reaction was a curse word, “but I won’t do that.” Flynn KNEW the Russia story was BS.
6. Rerack it. Again, in the video, look CLOSELY at Flynn’s face when he speaks about the Russia allegation as “a vast amount of deception going on here”. Wild, eh? In the days before the election of 2016, we see Lt General Mike Flynn take center stage attacking Hillary. Flynn makes a stand and “asks Hillary to step down”.
7. From the day before, we have Flynn paying tribute to those lost at Ft Hood, CALLING it Radical Islamic terror. Must not have gone over too well at C_A. https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/795105595485523968

Another lightbulb, background and context. Remember President Trump telling stories about how he had not spent much time in DC? Trump did not have decades of bureaucrats who owed their position to him. On the other hand, Flynn knew exactly who to call and where the bodies were buried. FLYNN knew what to do when it came to unraveling the intel community.
More context. The primary reason for intel failure on 9/11 was because intel agencies didn’t communicate with each other. Has it changed? Don’t they still treat their own agencies and BUDGETS like fiefdoms? Except, strangely, Nellie Ohr, Brennan, Peter Strzok came out of C_A – not really FBI agents. Yet, Brennan pushed the opening of the investigation to Harry Reid and snookered Comey into placing the counter-intel investigation at the FBI, run by McCabe. If the investigation went badly, Comey would take the heat, not Brennan. Remember, Brennan covered his behind. Brennan went to Congress in August of 2016 and said, “Muh Russians are trying to interfere”. It was Comey who avoided Congress for 9 months and was only revealed by Congressman Elise Stefanik’s lucky questioning.
1A. Flynn had a running war with Andy McCabe, stemming from Robin Gritz, and probably other things as well. We remember Gritz was a seasoned veteran at FBI and up for promotion. Flynn and others wrote strong letters of recommendation on her behalf. She was a shoe-in for the job. McCabe drummed her out of the FBI and she filed what is an equivalent to an EEOC complaint against McCabe. Who can forget McCabe’s alleged rally cry in an FBI meeting, “First we fu$k Flynn, then we fu$k Trump!” Now, think about that statement for a minute. Does it make sense to ANYONE, that McCabe would feel so viscerally about Flynn, if McCabe was only resentful about someone getting promoted 3 years ago? Do ya’ think there might be something else there, to elicit such a strong reaction from McCabe? 
2A. Why was the Deep State so afraid of Flynn? Why was it so important to remove Flynn BEFORE going after President Trump? AND why so fast? Really? Sally Yates was in Doug McGann’s office about FLYNN posing a threat to national security only FOUR days after the inauguration……….. and all for a Logan Act violation? Does that make sense to anyone who was born after 1798 — or the last time a Logan Act Violation was prosecuted?  
3A. Remember how Peter Strzok blew off the legal counsel and OIG for the Intel Community when THEY CAME TO HIM at FBI with proof Hillary’s server had been hacked? Why did Flynn keep asking Hillary to step down, “for the sake of our children”. Given what we know, or think we know, why did Flynn keep talking about children and the danger of Hillary?

4A. Why was it so important to CLOSE Hillary’s investigation – to the point that McCabe practically hid the Weiner laptop from Comey? Notice this tweet from Flynn on November 6th. Note the top of the tweet, “IMPOSSIBLE”. Flynn knew Comey was lying about Hillary’s emails on the Weiner laptop.

5A. In mid-February of 2017, why was Comey so “triggered” when President Trump said  “hope you can go easy on Flynn” or “put it all behind us”. Comey and President Trump had just finished dinner together. Presumably, Flynn had resigned only days prior. Flynn was done, threat removed. Comey should have felt safe. President Trump thought it was over with ……. but it wasn’t enough to merely let Flynn go. Flynn had to be destroyed and silenced. Why? Why was Flynn so dangerous? Why did the media keep asking President Trump if he had SPOKEN to Flynn since resigning?
6A. Same thing with Brennan, Comey, Clapper. Have we EVER seen former intel heads issue such wild and lascivious comments directed at a sitting President? When they knew it wasn’t true? Why all the excess venom? But don’t forget Schumer’s words, from January 3rd of 2017, BEFORE the dossier was released, BEFORE Comey and Clapper briefed President-Elect Trump on the dirty details, “Don’t mess with the intel community because they have six ways to Sunday to get back at you.”
Besides removing Brennan’s security clearance, what has President Trump done to these men to warrant such a wild reaction? Let’s think about it.
Let’s assume Comey/Brennan/Clapper really thought, for example, President Trump was wrong on the Iran Deal and a danger to the world. Okay, then they would be jumping up and down, telling the world why Iran needed a nuclear weapon, eventually. They would be relitigating their case for the Iran Deal, to convince all of us why their plan was better, …..why and where President Trump was wrong to reverse course. THAT would make sense. They wouldn’t be referring to the President in childish names or as the second coming of Hitler, ranting and raving like unhinged psychopaths, which is what they are doing. It doesn’t make sense. No, their behavior makes no sense at all, which can only lead to one conclusion….
…..There is something else going on. AND it was imperative to get retired Lt. General Mike Flynn out of the way, first. Flynn was the key to it all OR Flynn had the knowledge necessary to reveal it all.
One final subnote.
Manafort was almost as important. Manfort developed dossiers, straightforward background research to “soft blackmail”, on prominent people and had done so since the late 70’s. In The Ukraine and other hot spots around the world, Manafort did the same thing as the Podestas and the team of McCain and Rick Davis. They all played with the same various Russian Oligarchs and globalist bankers. Recall, part of Mueller’s investigation of Manafort included a subpoena to RAID Manafort’s hidden locker.
Again, for some unknown reason, it was necessary for the “Deep State” to silence Manafort, and they used an old and previously dismissed IRS charge to put him away. And don’t ever forget, a conscious decision was made, by someone, to go after Manafort. Silencing Manafort was MORE important than the obvious investigation delay/damage to an American President, the stability of our relationship with our Allies, our trade negotiations, and the potential harm to the American people.
WHAT could possibly be that important?

Folks, this is eerie weird. I was three hours into typing this mini-article and Don Jr.’s article with Politico was posted a few minutes ago. Same topic. Bizarre. Maybe we are onto something here. The Link to Don Jr.’s article and video is at the bottom of the article.
Here is my original post:
Manufactured outrage is good for business. Has American Mainstream Media helped to create or COLLUDE with Dems because it was good for business?
Are the Dems staying with the “Muh Russia” hoax because it is good for fundraising?
Stay with me for a minute. To establish mal-intent, we would need proof, right? Or maybe a circumstantial pattern of behavior?
Okay, let’s think back a few decades.
Desert Storm was credited for making CNN a competitive network. CNN’s wall to wall coverage of the war was an excellent service to the people, but it was also very good for CNN’s bottom line.
War is very good for the media business.
By the mid-90’s other cable news channels opened to compete with CNN.
Yet, the media model, of the coverage of Desert Storm, and the boost to business it brought to the network, was hard to duplicate. As media outlets were purchased and consolidated by companies who were more interested in stock price and return on investment, it would have been hard to resist the temptation to create a BUZZ for press coverage. We can imagine the zeal or search for the “golden” story that would drive coverage. Or……… How would a network get that kind of a boost in ratings, ad revenue, again, without another war?
Well…..
Election coverage naturally adds to a network or media’s bottom line. Many experts blame the revenue machine as the reason we see candidates starting their election campaigns earlier and earlier.
Now, think about CNN’s relentless coverage of missing Flight 370. The network covered the air disaster 24/7 to the point of mindless speculation of black holes and aliens from some pundits.
But……..
A missing plane is only good for a little while, maybe a few days.
A story like “Hands Up; Don’t Shoot” was good for 18 months…. even if it was fake. It was a golden story and too good to pass up. And the media descended into hell…. never again to arise and sitteth on a throne of integrity. Yes, the media, as a group, was questionable long before Ferguson, but we can admit, after Ferguson, the media became much worse.
CNN knew the truth of Michael Brown quickly, but pushed “Hands Up; Don’t Shoot” for over a year AFTER they knew it was false. Why? What was it worth to CNN/MSNBC and other outrage outlets? How lucrative? Endless panels, spent thousands of hours covering the “problem” of racism in America, when most Americans thought electing a black President proved America was PAST the point of racism. Some outlets even had a 1-800 hotlines for those who felt persecuted by racism = “Tell us your story”.
The burning of Baltimore and the death of Freddie Gray fed into the same narrative. Six officers were arrested, creating incredible friction between police departments and District Attorneys nationwide. Of course, the police were all exonerated. The fake story was pushed and did not represent the facts on the ground. The narrative of “Police = Bad” was pushed by media and the Dems…… to raise money. These false truths stoked racism instead of bring America together. By this point, the media was definitely NOT serving the interests of the people as a free press should.
Oh yes, racism is good for business in the media and for Dem fundraising.
The Charlottesville “fine people” hoax was a Christmas present for the media’s false narrative of racism. We know the President’s words have been misrepresented by the media, even the Wall Street Journal has written about the hoax.
Charlottesville’s “fine people” is a media hoax designed to make President Trump look like a racist and feed the money machine for the Dems and the Media. It’s completely inaccurate and the media knows it’s not true…. but the truth does not matter…. because the falsehood is good for business. Ever notice how many black reporters are White House correspondents?
“Trump mocking the disabled reporter” was also a hoax and the media knew it. Yet, it was one of the first times we see the media using Trump celebrity with a false narrative to make money for the media. The hoax was so convincing, many people in the USA still believe President Trump was intentionally cruel and insensitive to a disabled reporter. The personal discovery of the “disabled reporter” hoax led Brandon Straka to start the #WalkAway campaign.
School shootings are a boon to the Media and to Dem fundraising. Any wonder we saw the CNN Town Hall panel for Parkland students? Do you see the repetition? Do you see the repeat of strategy by the same media outlets, over and over. It’s clear. Again, with Parkland, we see lack of background emphasis of the actual facts. We barely heard the personal story of Nikolas Cruz, his family, his troubled life, the death of his mother, and an almost odd suppression of the problems in the Broward Sheriff’s Office. We also saw the Media and Dems intentionally hiding problems with Robert Runcie, Broward County Superintendent of Education. Was it because Runcie could be traced back to the Obama Administration? And of course, we saw the malicious suppression of the problems with “The Promise Program”, created by Runcie, for the Obama Administration —- which was the source of the problem which led to the Parkland Shooting….. and the root cause of the death of Trayvon Martin.
The Dems/Media collusion problem is the same with illegal immigration. How many times did we see the false narrative of “Children in Cages”. Mainstream media offered no explanation of the Obama era policy or the problems with the 9th Circuit Judge’s 20 day detention rule. Even the pictures of detention centers and chain link fencing were falsely portrayed. Yet, the story was the subject of endless hours of media coverage and a BOON to fundraising for the Dems who pushed the false story. Notice, our bad immigration laws still exist. The Dems have done nothing to solve the problem, and refuse there is an “emergency” – but they ALL made money…… talking about it.
The #MeToo movement allegedly carried the Dems to a House win in 2018. Yet, the movement has unraveled with various false charges, revelations of Dem lawmakers in Virginia, and the candidacy of Joe Biden. Have you noticed how the #MeToo movement has faded from view? Why? Why didn’t the same women advocate for real victims of domestic violence?
Did you notice how many Dem lawmakers pushed #MeToo and how much money they raised? Did you also notice NONE of those same lawmakers led protests at Hollywood studios, Cosmo Magazine, or during Fashion Week? Nothing to solve the problem —- only a boon for the Media and the coffers of Dem lawmakers.
Again and again, we see evidence of a circumstantial pattern of behavior. A false narrative is pushed by Media, Dems raise money, outrage is manufactured, Media receives boost in viewership, and the country is further divided…… but the Dems and the Media make money on the hate.
Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, has been as good for the Media as the “Muh Russia” hoax. Again, trading on President Trump’s natural celebrity, the Russian boogeyman narrative, potentially compromising an American Presidential Election has been a boon for network coverage and saved failing newspapers. THINK of the 500K+ articles written about the Russian hoax and thousands of hours of media time spent on this false conspiracy…….
And you know how we know it was a hoax? A false narrative intentionally pushed by the media? Follow the motive. Follow the money. If media outlets were pure in their intent, to inform the public and advocate for a free press, then it would be a natural course of business to examine, and YES, investigate of all aspects of Russian interference, right? But that is NOT what the media did. In fact, Zucker of CNN publicly claims it is not his duty to investigate, only report facts “as they know them”.
And, how is it possible for ALL Mainstream Media outlets to push the same false narrative? Why are ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, WaPost, NYTimes, AP, Reuters, all pushing the same false narrative…….., often using the same adjectives? Is it still “circumstantial” evidence?
Where were the interviews with “Russians” who wanted to influence our election? Are we to believe our intel agencies and all the news outlets could not produce a single bad Russian? If the Muh Russia story was real, if Russians really did try to influence our election in a serious way, why aren’t the media outlets relentless in their blame of the Obama Administration? No, instead, media outlets are hiring those responsible for the problem! Do we not see the hypocrisy here? CNN hiring Brennan or Clapper, would be akin to hiring a terrorist who might have taken down their Flight 370. Why hire the bad guy? The guys who were showed dereliction of duty.
No screaming? No real indignation? Where was the deep dive into CrowdStrike? Did anyone see Podesta on television, crying about the release and personal embarrassment of his emails being revealed? Where were the interviews of Facebook execs and their answers as to WHY they allowed Russians to influence Americans? Why aren’t the Dem Socialists protesting Facebook? Where were the interviews, and there should have been many, of Jack Dorsey? Why is no one protesting at Twitter corporate offices?
This is IMPORTANT:
And most of all, why isn’t Hillary Clinton blaming Facebook, Twitter, and the former Obama Admin officials who allowed her election to be “stolen”……….!!!!!
Again, we see the same pattern of behavior and collusion between Dems and Media. In fact, the media intentionally suppressed Muh Russia opposing viewpoints and attacked those who were investigating. The perpetuation of the fake story was necessary. Actual investigations into “Muh Russia” from Nunes and Republicans were attacked. Pundits like Glenn Greenwald and Alan Dershowitz, who held an opposing viewpoints, were shunned from their regular spots on CNN and MSNBC.
Oh yes, Muh Russia was very good for business in the media AND for Dem politicians.
Think about the recent practice, invented by Dem politicians but lately adopted by Republicans as well, of manufactured outrage during their committee questioning. Congressmen take the video to publish for fundraising. Within minutes of a Congressman questioning a witness, the video clip is loaded up to Youtube, pushed by a little but of ad spending, and the emails go out for fundraising. Money in the bank!
There are few absolutes in our world. Yet, like “death” and “taxes”, we know that “follow the money” is another absolute truth. “Muh Russia” was a cash cow for the Media and for Dem fundraising.
Adam Schiff knows damn well there was no collusion with Russia on behalf of the Trump campaign. Yet, that’s not Adam’s job = to find the truth. Adjust your thinking. Finding the truth is no longer the media’s job, is it? Adam’s job is to keep the narrative alive so the golden goose of fundraising is allowed to live on…. until the next hoax is manufactured.
Which leads us to wonder…….?
Have you noticed those in the media have known, for about a month, the Mueller report would be a dud. Gee, that was about the same time as the retread of the “Green New Deal” came out, right? Coincidence? Pushed by the cookie-cutter, attractive female, AOC? The “plan” is old. There’s nothing new about it. Do you see the media push and the Dem fundraising based on the Green New Deal? Does it begin to look familiar to you? Suppression of opposition, denial of real facts. We know the coroner in Puerto Rico only legally registered 56 deaths for Hurricane Maria and AOC’s 3000 number is pure fabrication. No protesting going on at the Chinese or India Embassy for their pollution? Again, not solving the problem, just raising money. It’s the same strategy, over and over.
The Democrats and the Media have parallel interests… it’s money, pure and simple…., and the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. Do we really believe these individuals “like” each other. Who would choose to spend Sunday brunch with Elizabeth Warren? Or watch Beto talk about baby turds he fed to his wife? What young female reporter wants to get close to Joe Biden? Does anyone want to go shopping with Kamala or would a REAL journalist rather expose international espionage….. like we see with China? And Bernie is old news…..
No, the Dems and the media don’t want to solve any problems in America and they actively resist solving problems……, because NOT solving the problem is lucrative.
Apparently, Donald Trump, Jr., agrees. Here’s his article and video from Real Clear Politics: Link

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
I was away the last few days coordinating the final phases of The Plan.
Trust The Plan.
You don’t believe me?
You say, I’ve been a Q skeptic and an atheist and neither one is consistent with being Q?
Bwahahahah!  What better cover?  Really, what better cover?
But now the time has come to unmask and deliver justice and finally restore our Republic.
I told you you’d be surprised when you found out who Q was!!