I start this one with more strict and loose constructionist principles. Going to do reminders each week until you pass your test.
Strict Constructionist – Literal and narrow reading (interpretation) of the document that limits the powers of the federal government to what it provides.
Loose Constructionist – Views it as a “living document” that is interpreted broadly that adapts to society as it evolves and its needs change..
First, I covered the two primary views of the Constitution and laws in general in our country. Next I covered the views throughout Christianity from the same perspectives using the ruling authority, the Bible. Today I will cover their Constitutional application with treaties, which means we return to federal documents and powers.
Wut? Yes, treaties. Since we are in the era of taking on government efficiency, why not?
😂
That statement may have gone over any a head reading this. You will learn why I said it later.
By reviewing this I hope you will see that very few treaties have been interpreted in a strict constructionist sense unless it is useful to do so by those in or seeking power. The rest of the time they are interpreted as loose as a goose’s diarrhetic bowel movement.
Sorry for that word image, but it was the most descriptive I could come up with to match a loose constructionist view of treaties, well, in about everything they did in federal government before PDT hit the scene.
Today’s scripture will stay with the nasty descriptive theme since I already went “there”. It comes from Proverbs 26:11,
Like a dog that returns to its vomit,
So is a fool who repeats his foolishness. (NASB)
We should heed that warning as a nation and quit believing we can do things opposed to God’s way and get away with it. We continue to exist because God wills us to exist. Turn from evil, do what is good in His sight.
Treaties
The definition of a treaty that I am referencing in this post with an assist from Merriam Webster follows,
An agreement or arrangement made by negotiation
See, that wasn’t hard. In this context it is a contract in writing between two or more political authorities (such as states or sovereigns) formally signed by representatives duly authorized and usually ratified by the lawmaking authority of the state.
It will probably be best for us to initially stick with American domestic treaties or else we will be here for awhile. So lets drill down on those relating to Pocahontas Warren’s kinfolk since they have been back in the news.
Native American Indian Treaties
How many treaties (contractual agreements) with native Indians are there? When were these agreements first violated by American governments?
There have been around 370 of them. We do not know how many were violated; we just know that a lot were and it started immediately per historical accounts. Most of the violations were never addressed and remedied. We also know the vast majority of the treaties were related to lands the native Americans held and were given in the original treaty agreements. Add in we know the SCOTUS has consistently ruled in favor of treaty provisions being honored through the years. And finally, we know that rarely has that latter point actually happened and been enforced, at least not long term.
So, which do you think that reflects, strict or loose constructionist approaches? Yup, loose in real life application while being strict at the SCOTUS level decisions. See how that works? Those in power on the ground basically do what they want until called out on it through the judiciary and the issues eventually make it to SCOTUS. If the ruling works in the powers that be’s favor they will be strict in their actions going forward, making it more difficult to over turn. If it works better to be loose, they keep doing the dirty anyway, at least until they cannot any longer. If there are no triggers to insure the activity in question stops or is changed after the highest court/SCOTUS ruling – they keep doing it like they did in the examples above with our native Indian population.
Let’s face it, the only real reason they made treaties was to root them off land, to stop or slow down the violence against settlers, and to pretend they were being legal until the government had sufficient military to handle any future resistance. They obviously had no intention of honoring treaties as written long term. They thought they could eventually interest the native Indians into assimilating into society. Over time the poverty they induced into reservations became a drain on resources. That also was intentional as they hoped many would leave and then assimilate. Over time they also found that they had uses for some of the natives’ land that was unanticipated when the treaties were first signed.
As the laws became more defined and case law took root, it became more difficult to outright take away the lands and relocate the tribes. Instead, they began corrupting tribal leadership, who then made deals to lease land to corporate and government interests. Sometimes a small amount of cash flow would come to tribal members, but never commiserate with what the lessors and corrupted leaders generated. Most times the non-leader tribal members received nothing. This left them as destitute and powerless as ever. Using corruption helped the government and businesses give the appearance it was all in compliance with established law and the treaties without actually being so. Loose constructionism combined with corruption won despite strict constructionist rulings from the judiciary as to treaty intent and administrative expectations.
As you might surmise, the Bureau of Indian Affairs has been completely corrupt for two centuries. It was intended and established to be that way. It was lipstick on the pig by the Secretary of War Calhoun of that day when it first was introduced. The following archived article accurately described how it exists in more current times.
As a result is it any wonder it ended up being placed under the purview of DOGE recently? From earlier this year,
#47 misses very little.
The current official status between BIA and DOGE is that BIA is undergoing a thorough review of their operations, finances and policies. Once complete, #47’s admin will make a decision on what happens next. However, in this guy’s world you are either a citizen or not. There should be no protected classes of citizens and should not have been two centuries ago. The nasty BIA needs to be disbanded with the land and business ownership concerns of tribes being mediated and brought into compliance with everybody and everything else in this country.
Which may be one good reason why #47 vetoed this very recently.
As well he should have.
Native Indian Music & Movie Corner
Some of the real thing,
Country folks singing about them are more my style
Warning of graphic violence on the next one. Not many who saw this film will ever forget it. Perhaps a reminder of the real world in those days? You decide.
Maybe it is good those days are over.
Conclusion
This is just one element of American society that has historically been a pit of corruption, but allowed to exist because nobody really wanted to deal with it as well as because there was so much loot and business opportunities exchanging hands between criminals. Their aim was to keep the gravy train going. But #47 knows about it and eventually it will be addressed.
For what it is worth, you probably can guess how most native Indians vote. Yup, Dem. In the last election it was 57% for Harris and 39% for #47. Among their number the criminals and those who exist on government hand outs always vote Democrat. Those who seek to build lives for themselves and families in the American way without handouts tend to vote GOP. It is really that simple and it also seems simple that we should give all a path toward achieving the American Dream by working like the rest of us and cut out the graft, theft, bail outs and special treatment. Time for all of the little birdies to fly away from the nest.
It is two centuries past time for native American Indians to assimilate into American society and for the BIA to be exterminated like the rats nest it is. Level the playing field with all protected classes and remove the special privileges. The accommodation period in America should have long been ended; it is the corrupt, greedy politicians who have kept it alive. Native American Indian tribe ancestors were a conquered people, just like loyalist British. The African and Irish slaves were freed. Indentured servanthood no longer exists. Claims for reparations and special treatment for native Indian citizens today are bullshiz just like they are for ancestors of African and Irish slaves. Reservations are current versions of Democrat plantations of old.
The Declaration of Independence is clear;
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That is the guiding doctrine and law of our land. Time for all citizens to act like it and the non-citizens granted legal permission to reside here to act like it.

Remember Wolf’s site rules. Note and label all AI. Please be kind to one another, we are all in this together. May God richly bless America and all of you.
Trust Trump and the plan.










At the end of your first paragraph, I first read “pass your” as “pass out”, which changes the meaning a bit — although it’s still a metaphor (hopefully).
In regards to treaties —
“Diplomacy is the art of saying ‘nice doggie’ until one can pick up a rock.”
What did the monkey… do?
Whatever it was, the monkey needed shocked.
👍😂
This was released within the last week, BTW. It’s the most recent PG song.
Here’s part of a long thread that I haven’t finished reading and can’t vouch for, but if what this guy alleges is true, it could be highly significant.
https://nitter.poast.org/sayerjigmi/status/2018374717426503946
#1/7:
============
#4/7:
At the end he gives the link to his Substack with the full explanation and documentation: https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein-files-illuminate
If nitter does not work try this:
https://xcancel.com/sayerjigmi/status/2018374717426503946
Staying warm?
Sort of. At least the electric stayed on. (We have no central heat. My choice since forced hot air out of floor vents is a killer for my allergies.)
We installed a Trion electrostatic precipitator when we re-did our furnace ducting, then moved it into the attic when we replaced our furnace. Does a wonderful job for allergies but I’m not sure they’re still selling them.
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately the finances will not support any upgrade at this time. (We have been robbed too many times.)
As you are well aware, things can lurk in the “interesting” file folder for many years before they happen.
Thread Reader:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2018374717426503946.html
Substack
BREAKING: The Epstein Files Illuminate a 20-Year Architecture Behind Pandemics as a Business Model—With Bill Gates at the Center of the Network
Why don’t they have body cameras already?
I thought every police department in the country did, for no other reason than we live in a sue-happy lawfare country.
Hi, there!
I was just listening to this one a little while ago, I’ve had the CD for a while now but just got around to listening to it.
Peter, Paul & Mary at the Newport Jazz Festival, 1963-1965, singing Hangman 😁
Nobody sings music like this today. Simple and direct, just vocal harmonies and a guitar or two.
.
Zeppelin did a version under the name “Gallows Pole” — it was a lot like this, but they were younger —
Yes!
From Led Zeppelin III (1970).
I don’t have as many copies of Led Zeppelin III as the other first four Zeppelin albums.
I do have a few though.
The CDs:
1) Led Zeppelin III – U.S. first issue CD, Atlantic SD 19128-2 (1987) with ‘Made in Japan’ on the disc face
2) Led Zeppelin III – Japan first issue CD (1987), Atlantic 32XD-566
And the CD single for the song that didn’t make the album, one of my favorites, Hey, Hey What Can I Do (‘A’ side, Immigrant Song) (CD single, first released in 1992, Atlantic 2777-2)
.
And then the LPs.
1) Led Zeppelin III – 2014 reissue, 2 LPs (2nd LP with bonus tracks), Atlantic R1-536182
2) Led Zeppelin III – 2000 reissue, 180g, remastered by Bernie Grundman from the original master tapes, all analog, Classic Records SD-7201.
Bernie started in the 1960s, and he is still working today, at his own mastering studio, cranking out top quality reissues of great classic rock era albums for companies like Analogue Productions. Bernie’s remaster of Jimi Hendrix’ Axis: Bold as Love (1967), in original mono and stereo, on double 12″ 45rpm records, is due out soon 😁
The link above is to his Wiki page, I didn’t realize Bernie had been nominated for 16 Grammy Awards, and he has won 3. Go Bernie!
3) Led Zeppelin III – Canadian first issue, 1970, on the solid red Atlantic label, Atlantic SD-7201
4) Led Zeppelin III – U.S. first issue, 1970, white label radio station promotional copy, Atlantic SD-7201
5) Led Zeppelin III – Great Britain first issue, 1970 on the red & plum colored label, A5/B5 matrix in the dead wax, Atlantic 2401 002, with Peter Grant credit on the label
And the 45rpm single, Hey, Hey What Can I Do (‘A’ side is Immigrant Song), Japan issue (1976) which I’ve had since around 7th grade, Atlantic P115A
I bought another copy more recently, maybe 20 years ago, in near mint condition. My old one was played a lot and not on very good equipment, but I still have it 😁
Have you ever run the a bitwise compare on the CD tracks?
“Have you ever run the a bitwise compare on the CD tracks?”
__________
No, I used to use EAC (Exact Audio Copy) to rip CDs, but either it stopped working, or somewhere along the way I forgot to reinstall it after a computer upgrade.
You can check it on the Dynamic Range Database though.
Led Zeppelin III Dynamic Range Database main page
.
Discogs link
The Japan 1st issue CD, Atlantic 32XD-566 (Dynamic Range Database page link)
Album DR: 12
Min. track DR: 09
Max. track DR: 12
Track DR: 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 09
.
Discogs link
The U.S. 1987 first issue CD, with ‘MADE IN JAPAN BY DAIO KOSAN CO. LTD.’ on the disc face, Atlantic SD 19128-2
Dynamic Range Database link (which the DR database identifies by the bar code, and claims it was issued in 1986)
Album DR: 12
Min. track DR: 09
Max. track DR: 12
Track DR: 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 09
So we can be confident they are the same mastering, but I would expect them to be, since they were both made in Japan.
And because both CDs are credited to Barry Diament as the digital mastering engineer on Discogs.
Barry did the whole original CD Zeppelin catalog. He used to post over at the Steve Hoffman music forum and answer questions about classic rock albums he worked on, which was always interesting.
Barry did all of the original first issue CD Bob Marley albums, too 👍
I just noticed that the photo at Discogs for the domestic Japan 1st issue (Atlantic 32XD-566) is wrong.
It’s the right catalog number, but it’s a later repress, which you can tell because of the bar code, all the vertical dashes, i.e., “||||| |||||| |||| ||||||| ||| ||||||||” visible in the matrix area, around the hub:
.
Originals don’t have any stinkin’ bar codes in the matrix area 😁
Mine has 11A1 +++++ and ‘CSR’, and no barcode, which is a 1st issue.
The one above is 11A2 +++++, no ‘CSR’, with a barcode.
If I remember correctly, bar codes didn’t start appearing on CD matrixes until 1989 or 1990. Maybe even 1991, I would have to check my old notes.
The Zeppelin III CD (32XD-566) with the barcode is an odd one.
There was a reissue in Japan in 1988 on the Warner-Pioneer label.
Discogs shows the 1988 Japan issue has 11A3 +++++ in the matrix area, and a barcode, with the newer catalog number (20P2-2025) on the disc face.
It shouldn’t have a bar code in the matrix area either (1988 should be too early for bar codes), so I don’t think the Discogs listing photo is correct for that one either:
.
The later issues (with bar codes in the matrix) could have been made years later, it could even be a ‘secret’ (uncredited) remaster using who knows what tape source.
With all the content out there, it’s an open question whether one might focus on various releases of one album from one band, or various live bootlegs of a band, or videos of a band, or recordings of comparable bands. Each take can be a rabbit hole of significant depth.
Already, tech costs have declined to the point where you don’t have to be a millionaire to have a music collection that would have been insane in the 1980’s.
Better sound quality here, from a BBC concert in 1965, singing Gordon Lightfoot’s Early Morning Rain, which was on Gordon’s debut album in 1966.
This song is on PP&M’s 10 Years Together Greatest Hits album (1970), which was played at our house about every weekend when I was growing up, since before I can remember 😁
.
“Very Respectively,” not “Very Respectfully.” Auto-correct? He did say he was respectful at the beginning.
It would be great to have him sitting there, front and center so Bubba and Hitlery can see him, as they lie under oath 😁
And then, they could call Buzz Patterson to the witness stand and ask him, as an eye witness, whether Bubba and Hitlery’s testimony was true or false 🤣
Bonus vid —
The one with a girlfriend?