I have wanted to get this article out, but I was stuck on “number 10”. Sure, I could come up with TEN. EASY. But I needed a good one for NUMBER 10. I mean, I needed a REALLY GOOD ONE.
And our blessed President, Donald J. Trump, VSG, just gave it to me today.
Stick around for it.
Once you see this stuff, you cannot unsee it. This is Q on steroids. You follow this, and it shows that everything Q has been telling us is the straight dope.
That “16-year plan to destroy America”? OMG – it was part of a much larger and longer plan. The exact length is not important. What is important is the 8 years of Bill and Hillary Clinton, leading up to 9/11. THAT is significant. They fit into Q’s 16-year plan like a prequel.
The key is CLOWARD-PIVEN.
OK – let’s begin.
That part is actually important. Cloward-Piven depends on SURPRISE. This is why it’s not a form of legitimate government. It’s a form of subversion.
OK – now we REALLY begin.
1. Trump saved a ton of money and gutted lots of unworking CRAP by overhauling the Clinton sabotage
That right there is a sign that we are dealing with highly intentional Cloward-Piven waste.
Now, THIS part is what I call “classic” Cloward-Piven. This is just a special case, like special relativity is to general relativity. It’s all about economics, public services, overuse of them, getting people onto welfare rolls, etc. In this case, we’re talking about “things that waste money” more generally. We are talking about OBVIOUS MONEY STUFF. This is the Cloward-Piven stuff that we KNOW about. Money-related.
It turns out that Richard Cloward and Frances Piven reacted to the outing of their strategy, and to the various COUNTERMEASURES against it, by looking for NEW ways to make it work again. OPEN BORDERS is one of them.
Basically, when people put measures in place to LIMIT overuse of public services encouraged by Alinskyites like Cloward and Piven, THEY came up with the idea of OVERWHELMING with sheer numbers – hence OPEN BORDERS.
Starting to see why the Dem radicals are so adamant on refusing to give an inch on Trump’s Wall? He’s unmasking the Cloward-Piven radicals, folks.
Starting to see why Nancy Pelosi ran hidden progressive Danny O’Connor against WALL supporter Troy Balderson?
Hey – Trump Unmasking is FUN!
However, it gets worse. I believe that Cloward and Piven themselves helped the Clintons design a lot of very bad stuff into the 1994 Crime Bill. Some of it will come out in the next nine reasons. This other stuff is LIKE standard Cloward-Piven in its effects, but it goes WAY beyond it.
PS – if this “Wall” stuff is giving you a funny feeling about Bill and Hillary sounding “pro-borders” at any point in their miserable radical lives, then let me solve that little mystery right now. They LIED all the way through.
2. Joe “Handy-Man” Biden was the “author” of the Clinton crime bill
Yes – that would be CAUGHT plagiarist Joe Biden as the “author”.
Yes – this would be the SAME Joe Biden who was the “author” of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990.
That would be the same Joe Biden who lied to us about “get a shotgun” when the Commie Cabal tried to take our guns after the Sandy Hook “sketchy propaganda-augmented psychological event”.
Enjoy his lies MOCKED, after Red Diaper Sergey and the Wocommie Sisters YouTube Faction helped their fellow radicals spread Biden’s propaganda.
The fact is, Joe Biden has been an integral straight man for an enormous amount of cabal shenanigans. His constant, repeated involvement in these things is very sketchy.
There is also another reason Biden is a suspect – I will get to that later.
3. There had been a giant federal crime bill only 4 years earlier.
Yes – the same one that included Joe Biden’s Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990. That would have been under GHWB, by the way, so if you think he was innocent of the plans – well – not very likely.
Why did we need another crime bill? AH – there is the rub.
4. The Clintons used their own misguided Waco raid as justification for the crime bill, and particularly the “assault weapon ban”
The disastrous Waco raid was planned LONG BEFORE the Clintons arrived in Washington, and possibly even before they began officially campaigning.
Years ago, I was shocked to learn from some witness (the article is long gone – I have never been able to find it again) that Hillary had been intensely interested in the Branch Davidian group very early – while (in the opinion of the witness) there was no real reason for her to be interested. This came out in the scandal after the failed raid.
Well, it makes sense now, if we accept that she had a LONG TERM PLAN.
Hillary needed a communist propaganda event to justify the Clinton crime bill, which had many LARGER purposes, including gun confiscation. A CULT with GUNS makes a VERY handy target for a MASS PSYCHOLOGICAL EVENT.
The problem was, just like everything else that Hillary touched, disaster ensued, not always in the way that the radicals planned.
4. Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven THEMSELVES were very likely involved in the bill’s design, or had influence on it
This is the most astounding part, if it’s true. All I can tell you is this – Cloward and Piven THEMSELVES were involved in the DESIGN and SIGNINGS of AT LEAST two other bills – one of those in 1993 and the other one in 1996 – thereby bracketing the crime bill.
The first bill was Motor Voter – obviously designed to help Democrat electoral cheating. The second was Welfare Reform in 1996. Clearly they were making sure that Welfare Reform didn’t damage their Alinsky welfare ABUSE models TOO MUCH.
Can you IMAGINE including these radical theorists in the design of ANY bills? This is how people build back doors into systems – get some RINGERS on the inside. And Cloward and Piven were TOP SHELF ringers.
It is very important to realize that Cloward and Piven were IDOLS of the Clinton entourage, as well as Obama’s mentors. They had INFLUENCE in the Bill Clinton administration. And their MODEL works on SURPRISE – on being DISHONEST about ABUSING systems through Alinsky tactics.
But it gets worse.
5. Under generalized Cloward-Piven revolutionary objectives, throwing more black people into prison would be a FEATURE, not a BUG
This is the part that freaked me out when I realized it. This kind of sabotage cannot be done from OUTSIDE the system – one has to get INSIDE. Which is exactly what the Clintons did.
The Clintons used their 1994 crime bill to SET UP the justification for something that would become the Black Lives Matter movement. They used that bill to foment the basis for communist revolution with a strong racial component.
This was exactly Stalin’s plan, by the way. To exacerbate American race problems into a revolution or civil war.
Remember when Hillary was “confronted” by BLM activists after Bernie gave up his microphone so pathetically? Remember Hillary showing some kind of middling “resolve”, and gently debating them?
FAKE! It was absolutely scripted, just like everything else she does.
Just like I think her zinger about “Holder, not Booker, they all look the same” in a sarcastic tone mocking Republicans, was scripted. NO WAY. The moderator wasn’t a natural deceiver, and read the wrong name with clear deliberation and knowledge. I spotted that one. SCRIPTED. Just like all the little kids. Just like her debate questions. Just like everything else she does. Utterly scripted.
The kicker here is that there is no way the CLINTONS get blamed for this – except that Hillary went JUST A WEE BIT overboard with “superpredators“.
The problem with “superpredators” is that it left an easy way to connect HER to the Clinton crime bill and the INTENDED effect of mass incarceration of blacks.
So finally – WHY would the Clintons want this to happen? NOT merely to build up revolutionary grievance. They would also want it for – DRUMROLL – standard Cloward-Piven effects. Mass incarceration is EXPENSIVE – it will build up the system debts – overload it – break it – and bring about the communist revolution. She WANTED it.
6. Under generalized Cloward-Piven revolutionary objectives, 100,000 more police on the streets works WITH mass incarceration to help create the other side of BLM
Look at it. Right there. The other side of the future confrontation of BLM, and the Clintons set it up, while looking like they were solving the problem.
More police, more criminals, and make them each other’s enemy.
Look like you’re solving it, when you’re actually making it worse.
Now part of this is NARRATIVE CONTROL. The normal effect of incarceration and REAL NEWS is to make people change their behavior.
The radicals knew how to prevent those police from working – the gangsta rap movement and elements of hip-hop lifestyle that GLORIFIED sex, violence and basic criminality. The radicals used CULTURAL MARXISM to keep the 100,000 extra police from having any social effect. Which means MORE CLOWARD-PIVEN spending with NO EFFECT.
See how that works? Cultural Marxism is VERY effective.
7. Bill Cooper’s leak and what we know today MATCH, showing that the Clinton crime bill was part of their plan. Future proves past.
OK – this meme is a bit of a “Bill Cooper remix” joke, but not really.
This is a long story. Dig in if you have the time, and will enable you to see so much about what is going on.
There was a military leaker / whistle-blower named Bill Cooper who shook the “conspiracy theory” world during the Clinton administration. He ended up being killed shortly before 9/11, but don’t let that part get in the way. He casually mentioned a bunch of stuff about UFOs AND intentional military UFO disinformation projects, that sounded a lot like what we heard from others, but ignore that for now. He even talked about a kind of “depopulation agenda” (my words) that sounds a heck of a lot like the entire current UN policy and the Clintons’ actions – both Bill and Hillary – and the Clinton Foundation’s interests, but again – put that aside for the moment.
The thing that was most profound and relevant from Bill Cooper, for what we are talking about right now – the Clinton crime bill – was an almost exact description of what the Democrats did LATER with “assault weapons”.
Here is a larger version of the same section:
So you see here an outline of what has since become very obvious.
Bill Cooper actually explained something I could never explain – the fact that Bill Clinton and the Red Chinese seemed to be doing the OPPOSITE of what Bill Clinton was saying publicly on “assault weapons”.
In 1993 and 1994, Bill and Hillary Clinton were publicly saying that “assault weapons” were bad, bad, bad. But if you were part of the gun world then, you would have seen the OPPOSITE in reality.
CHINA – with the blessing of the Clintons, began DUMPING all their old SKS and AK-47 rifles INTO the United States, at dirt-cheap prices, as a way to begin financing their military modernization. This continued for the ENTIRE 8 years of Bill Clinton. Not only that – the Clinton DOJ used FBI informants to hand these things out like CANDY to everybody they could talk into one, using arguably bogus private sales – the EXACT THING which Democrats rail against now.
“WHY?” – in Hillary’s cackling voice – one might ask.
Well, Bill Cooper seems to have an answer. And his ANSWER was published BEFORE it happened.
If you’re interested in Bill Cooper, here is a long (2 hour) interview, back when CNN was still a very reasonable non-government network. Remember – he eavesdropped a lot of things, and he realized that he himself was fed disinformation to test for leaks. He was trying to figure it all out – not always successfully. So stay skeptical, but look for places where it looks solid, or CLOSE to the facts.
8. Democrat policies on crime and domestic security after 1994 always chose and continue to choose the expensive and freedom-encroaching over the effective.
Notice how even left-wing BBC was seeing that – in 2016 – the 1994 Clinton crime bill was STILL problematic.
But more importantly, note the PRICE TAG. THIRTY BILLION!
Note that the price tag of the Border Security bill that was passed under Obama was over 45 BILLION – 50% more than the 30 BILLION for the 1994 Clinton Crime Bill.
And yet you hardly even REMEMBER that bill under Obama – right? And yet, if anything, our illegal immigration problems are WORSE today than they were under Obama, despite re-spending 50% MORE. Right?
See how that works? The Obama border security package was NOT EFFECTIVE – or they could MAKE it ineffective (with things like DACA), and THAT is why they passed it.
MORE MONEY – NO EFFECT – YEAH, BABY – DEMS ARE GOOD TO GO!
Think about how the Democrats will ALWAYS vote for bloated packages which do nothing, but for a measly 5.7 billion for an actual wall – NO WAY.
Just think about it. One might say that they have stuck to the plan.
It’s called CLOWARD-PIVEN.
The whole point of Democrat policy since 1994 has been to FOLLOW THE PLAN started by the 1994 crime bill.
9. Democrat leadership was strangely quiet and absent on the First Step Act.
Whoops! No black people? Just wait until Trump gets out of this signing to a presser with THE PEOPLE.
The people you will NOT see associated with this thing are (1) the Democrat leadership, and (2) the TDS media.
Think about that. Trump, GOP, and renegade Dems – largely BLACK – supported criminal justice reform. NOT the “governmedia”. NOT the Democrat-media complex.
At first you might think the ABSENCE of Schumer and Pelosi would simply be out of embarrassment. But the fact is, President Trump NEVER blamed the need for an overhaul on the Democrats OR the Clintons. It would have been SO EASY to keep the Dems away from First Step, but Trump never did. Not once.
Oh, that Unmaking Trump is SO CLEVER.
It would have been VERY easy for the Democrat leadership to make political hay out of the First Step Act – to claim some of the glory for it. Trump would have let them.
But they didn’t. NOT one bit. And yet the BLACK FOLKS were all over it.
Listen to Trump call it “bipartisan”.
Think about that. Black folks want something, and the DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP doesn’t want to have any part of it.
And let’s dig deeper on THAT – because it takes us to the very heart of this thing.
Something very odd went on here. BLACK support for Trump overhauling the Clinton bill went 100% across the board from KANYE….
….to VAN FRIGGIN’ JONES!!!
Yes – THAT Van Jones….
Notice that commie Jones took a lot of heat for his honesty about Trump.
THAT is significant.
The great IRONY here is that, in trying to turn the humiliation and discipline of “Menshevik” Van Jones for siding with Trump, into some kind of lesson for liberals to “stay on the Plantation at all times”, what WaPo actually did is document how the left preserves the efficacy of Cloward-Piven operations. This is where media discipline and solidarity are so critical to communist operations.
ONE IS A STRAY. TWO IS A SLAVE REVOLT. Know who to return to the fold (Van Jones), and who must be crushed (Kanye West), because the latter will escape again, or not return when offered safety, and THAT breeds rebellion.
It is only because Van Jones is still valuable to the left, and because it is too risky to drive him over to Kanye-land, AND because there are ENOUGH black voices ready to criticize him from the Plantation, that Van Jones was not completely demolished.
But the fact is, the MEDIA and the DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP just had one of their MAIN ARTILLERY BATTERIES knocked out by Trump – thanks to Kanye West and Kim Kardashian. With help from Van Jones.
The Democrats are NOT about helping black Americans. They are about using blacks. Until somebody BETTER to use comes along.
10. They just don’t care about crime.
President Trump has finally hammered home the most important point of my Top Ten – and he did it today.
THEY DON’T ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT CRIME.
Just listen to it. He hammers it home.
Trump is talking about the BORDER, but if what he says is true – and I absolutely believe it – then it means that these Democrats never cared about crime when they created the 1994 Clinton crime bill.
They cared about REVOLUTION.
So go back in time. WHY did they have this crime bill that Trump had to FIX after decades of trouble caused by it?
BECAUSE IT WAS SUPPOSED TO CAUSE THE TROUBLE.
Who were the TOP people associated with the 1994 Clinton crime bill?
Biden, Schumer, and THE CLINTONS.
Epilogue
I love the way the old FBI show of the 1960’s had an “Epilogue” at the end, where they talked about the results of the crime and the investigation.
Usually it’s punishment.
This time, it’s not.
Not yet.
W
