Health Friday 7.17.2026 Open Thread: ER-100: SV40 Injected Into the Eyes to “Reverse Aging”, Part Two of Two

The free vintage image for the header of today’s offering is courtesy of ClipArt and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health,, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats by Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items will be cited as such in today’s offering. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you. Note: As with Part One, today’s offering is not to be viewed as a “hit piece” on Dr. Sinclair, nor as a denigration on his work. This series is simply focused on aspects of one part of his work.

Part One of this series is here: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/07/10/health-friday-7-10-2026-open-thread-er-100-sv40-injected-into-the-eyes-to-reverse-aging-part-one/. Today’s offering is Part Two of two. There are several areas to cover.

First area: continuation of the presentation of WO/2020069373, the Patent (second Patent) template for ER-100, an “invention” by Dr. David Sinclair, PhD, of Harvard University, et al. The Patent is here: https://patentscope.wipo.net/search/en/WO2020069373. The Title of the Patent is: “WO2020069373 — CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING TO REVERSE AGING AND PROMOTE ORGAN AND TISSUE REGENERATION.”

Section 00542 and Section 00543: “TRE-human OSK – SV40 (SEQ ID NO. 105)” — the gene sequence.

Section 00544 and Section 00545: “EFS-human OSK-SV40 (SEQ ID No: 106)” — the gene sequence.

Section “Additional Embodiments”: there are 151 listings of additional embodiments (combinations) of the ER-100 template: Sections numbered 00578 through 00730.

The following are from the PDF of the Patent.

FIG. 3: circle schematic (vector map) showing the SV40 position. Please see below:

FIG. 7C: schematic of optic nerve crush performed on the lab mice to simulate an eye injury as part of the experiments to lab-create the ER-100 template. Please see the image, below:

FIG. 8A: image of “Regeneration Potential”. Please see below:

Second area: The initial (first) Patent regarding ER-100, also an “invention” of Dr. David A. Sinclair, et al. This patent is found here: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docID=WO2020069339&_cid=P22-MRGI4D-39697-1. The Title of this Patent it: “MUTANT REVERSE TETRACYCLINE TRANSACTIVATORS FOR EXPRESSION OF GENES.” The International Filing Date for this Patent was 27 September 2019; the Publication Date was 2 April 2020. Inventors: Sinclair, David, A., et al. Patent Applicants: the President and Fellows of Harvard College, 17 Quincy St., Cambridge, MA, 02138.

The following are short summaries of some of the Claims listed in this Patent:

Claim Number 10: listing of SV40.

Claim Number 22 and Claim Number 23: “SV40-derived terminator sequence.”

Claim Number 30 “Pharmaceutical composition”, followed by Claim Number 33 (includes viruses and AAV); Claim Number 34 (includes SV40); Claim Number 44 (methods) — Claim Number 44 lists doxycyline as “promoting expression of the first transgene.”

Claim Number 45, Claim Number 46, Claim Number 47: 1st and 2nd engineered nucleic elements present in a virus.

**** Claim Number 48: “…wherein the method comprises withdrawing tetracycline.”

**** Claim Number 49: “therapeutically effective amount of [a]-[b] or [a]-[c] are administered to a subject in need thereof.” This refers back to Claim 1 of the Patent above, in which [a]-[b] = the G72 and the G12 positions in the rtTA3 of the composition (SEQ ID NO:11); and, [a]-[c] = the G12 and the F67 positions in the rtTA3 (SEQ ID NO:11.)

FIG. 8B: schematic of SV40 sequence added to TRE3G and presence of ftTA4 element. Please see below:

FIG. 9: circle schematic (vector map) of the “mutant” tetracycline (doxycycline) in the ER-100 composition at position 1000. Please see below (Yours Truly rotated the image which is in the Patent):

FIG. 13: circle schematic (vector map) of SV40 relative to promoter / terminator / editing sequences in the ER-100 composition. Please see below (Yours Truly rotated the image which is in the Patent):

Third area: the Clinical Trial (in recruiting) for ER-100: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07290244, “Evaluating ER-100 for Safety in People with Glaucoma or Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (Optic Nerve Conditions.)” Study Start (Actual): 2026-03-02; Primary Completion (Estimated): 2027-05; Study Completion (Estimated): 2032-03; Enrollment (Estimated): 18; Phase: Phase 1. Yours Truly will be discussing items from the “Researcher View” of this clinical trial.

From the “Outcome Measures (Primary)” section: it appears that study subjects will take an 8-week course (56 days) of doxycycline, which is called an “Activation Period.” There are numerous tests that study subjects will take during this “Activation Period”, such as, “Safety Laboratory Tests”, blood tests of various types, etc.; “Changes in Baseline Intraocular Pressure” tests; “Changes in Visual Acuity” tests; among other tests. These tests will be repeated on Day 112 of the study.

From the “Outcome Measures (Secondary)” section: it appears that study subjects have “secondary measures” testing performed during the 56-day doxycycline “Activation Period”, and also repeated on Day 112 of the study, such as: “Change in Baseline in Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) Test Results”; Retinal Nerve Thickness tests; ER-100 viral shedding tests; tests to determine if ER-100 viral DNA has appeared in the aqueous humor of the eye; among others. Study subjects will be followed “for up to 5 years to monitor long-term health and vision outcomes.”

From the “Detailed Description” section: NCT07290244 will have two “study cohorts.” Within each cohort, a “sentinel” study subject will receive an initial dose of ER-100 in an eye. From there, various tests will be performed to investigate whether this dose was tolerated; if it was, the dose will be “approved” by “Data Safety Monitoring Board”, and the other study subjects in the same cohort will receive that dose of ER-100. It appears that increase, or reduction, of the ER-100 dose will also be under the aegis approval of this board.

From the “Intervention” section: this describes the makeup of ER-100. At no point in this section is there any mention of SV40: only the other three “Yamanaka factors” are mentioned (OCT-4; SOX-2; KLF-4.) There is no mention of SV40 being used to “swap out” the fourth “Yamanaka factor” (c-Myc.) Were the study subjects informed that there would be SV40 in the ER-100 dose that would be injected into their eye? https://www.lifebiosciences.com/life-biosciences-announces-first-patient-dosed-in-phase-1-trial-of-er-100-for-optic-neuropathies/, 9 June 2026.

Fourth area: the 2020 paper by David A. Sinclair, et al., the “template” for ER-100: https://ophed.com/system/files/2020/09/s41586-020-2975-4_SMALL.pdf, “Reprogramming to recover youthful epigenetic information and restore vision”, David A. Sinclair, et al.; 2 December 2020.

From the section, “Reset of ageing signatures rather than identity”, the following quotation: “Our first goal was to find a way to reset the epigenome without erasing cell identity. Among the genes expressing the Yamanka factors, Myc is an oncogene that reduces the lifespan of mice (20) and is not required for the initiation of cellular reprogramming (21). We therefore excluded MYC from out experiments…” Based on this, Yours Truly asks this question: If it is true that Myc is an oncogene, and that for this reason, it was excluded from the Sinclair experiments: then why was a known potential cancer promoter element — SV40 — included in the template formulation (composition) for ER-100? Please see below, again from the paper, in the Methods section, subsection “Production of adeno-associated viruses“:

Another quotation from the section cited above: “Next we tested the long-term safety of ectopically expressing OSK in vivo. To deliver and control OSK expression in mice, we engineered a dual adeno-associated virus (AAV) system under the tight control of a tetracycline response element (TRE) promoter (Fig. 1a).”

Referring back to the second Patent for the ER-100 template (WO/2020/069373, presented in Part One of this series), found here: https://patentscope.wipo.net/search/en/WO2020069373, from the Description:

Section 0047: AAV (adeno-associated viruses) may be used in compositions of ER-100. So can any of the recombinant viruses (herpes virus; vaccinia virus; alphavirus; and so on — “alone or in combination.”

Section 00221: list of recombinant viruses.

**** Section 00222 and Table 1.: list of recombinant AAV virus types; Table 1. is the list of AAV serotypes. AAV2 and AAV9 were the serotypes most used in the mice experiments for the December 2020 paper. AAV9 serotypes cross the Blood-Brain Barrier (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adeno_associated_virus.)

**** Section 00239, Section 00240, Table 2.: OSK (the Yamanaka Factors OCT-4, SOX-2, KFL-4) “…may be activated…in combination with activating an enhancer of reprogramming and/or inhibiting a barrier of reprogramming.” This sentence is highly significant, in light of the Table 2. Non-limiting strategies to enhance reprogramming. One of the “barriers to reprogramming” that would be inhibited is the p53 protein — the very protein that is the “master control” element in the human body to detect and suppress cancer cells. (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-our-censored-study-showing, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 19 December 2025; https://www.theqtree.com/author/pavaca1/, search “p53”.)

All of above is aside from the fact that Dr. Sinclair and his co-authors apparently had no issues with simulating eye injury effects in lab mice by crushing the optic nerve of the mice (under anesthesia); and, with simulating glaucoma effects in lab mice by injecting large amounts of microbeads into the eyes of the mice. After which, the mice were evaluated, then eventually euthanized for autopsy. Yours Truly will call these lab mice “Sinclair’s mice” (recall the phenomenon of “Fauci’s beagles” in the NIH-funded experiments with beagle puppies and sand flies: please see https://bfp.org/, the Beagle Freedom Project.)

Yours Truly is not making a case against therapeutic efforts that MAY BE helpful or conclusive in slowing down, stopping, or even reversing, medical conditions such as, certain eye diseases (whether or not these eye diseases are relating to the aging process): therapeutic efforts that MAY work. However, one also believes that therapeutic efforts which include inhibiting the body’s ability to detect and suppress cancer cells (such as, ER-100 containing elements that would inhibit the p53 cancer cell detector / suppressor protein); along with adding a known potential cancer promoter element (SV40) — is not the way to go. Similarly, why would a therapeutic effort need to include potentially using a recombinant virus (such as, ER-100 containing elements of, for example, the herpes virus [see Part One of this series])? If one is reading the December 2020 paper and the Patent WO/2020/069373 for the ER-100 template correctly; and the September 2019 Patent WO/2020/069339 for the “Mutant Reverse Tetracycline Transactivators” correctly — it appears that a tetracycline (doxycycline) is first added into, then removed from, the composition of ER-100, thus requiring a course of doxycyline to be taken by the patient (or, in the case of NCT07290244, the study subjects) to “activate” the “transgenes” in the composition. What happens after the 56-day course of doxycycline that the Clinical Trial NCT07290244 study subjects will take, in order to “activate” the ER-100 in the body? Does the ER-100 just keep working “on its own” inside the body after this course of doxycyline is completed? What happens if the ER-100 stops working, either during the clinical trial, or during the 5-year-follow period? What about the 5-year-long follow timeframe for the NCT07290244 study subjects in general?: Is this out of an “abundance of caution?” Or, is it, so to speak, to use the study subjects as a kind of “long-term human lab mouse study group since actual mice don’t live for 5 years” situation? Is it reasonable to ask: What recourse do the NCT07290244 study subjects have in the event that a serious adverse event occurs to them, either during the study period, or afterwards?

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 7.3.2026 Open Thread: Health Freedom: An Opinion Piece

The word cloud image of Good Health for today’s offering header is courtesy of Dreamstime and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, the must cite their source. Thank you.

Health Freedom

Guard Your Health Freedom: The federal government will not do this for you, or for your family. Nor will the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, or the Federal Judiciary. In fact, the federal government (via the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the United States military’s biological weapons development and procurement divisions (DARPA and military research labs), and both the House of Representatives and the Senate (funding these activities) are doing all they can to continue the imposition of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections) on the citizens of the United States of America.

Example: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/hhs-awards-moderna-314-million-for, “HHS Awards Moderna $314 Million for Adult and Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccines: SAM.gov”, 28 June 2026. These awards were granted to Moderna through the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. The awards contracts were granted on 3 June 2026. The awards numbers and amounts are:

Pediatric: Award Number 75D30126D21000 for $285,044,250.

Adult: Award Number 75D30126D21003 for $29,183,000.

Example: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/cdc-awards-pfizer-12-billion-for, “CDC Awards Pfizer $1.2 Billion for More COVID Vaccines: SAM.gov”, 11 June 2026. These awards were granted to Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) through the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. The awards contracts were granted on 3 June 2026. The awards numbers and amounts are:

Pediatric: Award Number 75D3012621001 for $735,720,598.

Adult: Award Number 75D30126D21004 for $505, 272, 000.

The CDC Office of Acquisition Services is located at 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA, 30333. The most current (as of 20 June 2024) organization chart for the CDC’s Office of Financial Resources (of which the Office of Acquisition Services is part) is listed here: https://www.cdc.gov/about/media/pdfs/ofr-org-chart.pdf. There are NO EMPLOYEE NAMES associated with ANY of the offices listed on this chart. None of the awards contracts listed above have any contract details, other than the date of the awards, the company name that is the awardee, and the contract number. These awards are examples of how the current HHS is operating. So much for “oversight” and “transparency” in the current HHS. Who exactly signed the awards documents for HHS? Who signed the acceptance documents at Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) and at Moderna? Did HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., know about these awards in advance and signed off on them? Was he told after the fact and then signed off on them? A screenshot of one of the “information pages” for one of these awards is below. My apologies for the length of the screenshot — one has to see this to believe it:

Who is Jariya Taylor, the “Primary Point of Contact” for this award? Apparently, via Internet search, this person is a “Procurement Officer” with the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. Who is Chad Turner, the “Alternative Point of Contact” for this award? Apparently, via Internet search, this person is also a “Procurement Officer” with the CDC Office of Acquisition Services. How long have they worked for the CDC? What are their qualifications to be “Procurement Officers”? Are these employees the exact ones who signed the awards documents for HHS / CDC for the Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) and the Moderna awards? Why does the award state, “Inactive” at the top of the document? What happened to the money? Who at Pfizer (PfizerUSA / Pfizer-BioNTech) “solicited” this award? Or, did the CDC, via Jariya Taylor and Chad Turner, reach out to the company to “be aware of an opportunity (award)”? Does the reader see how the game is played between Big Pharma, the CDC — and all using taxpayer monies?

Another point: How do the CDC awards to Moderna for their 2026-2027 modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections) square with THIS story?: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/misc-emerging-topics/moderna-chief-company-won-t-invest-new-late-stage-vaccine-trials, “Moderna chief: Company won’t invest in new late-stage vaccine trials”, Stephanie Soucheray, MA, 26 January 2026. Moderna CEO, Stephane Bancel, made these remarks at the WEF summit in Davos in January. Direct quotation from the article, from Mr. Bancel: “You cannot make a return on investment if you don’t have access to the U.S. market.” Direct quotation from the article: “He [Mr. Bancel] said the vaccine market in the United States is much smaller as more anti-vaccine guidelines have become the norm.” If that is so, then WHY did the CDC “create the opportunity” to award Moderna $314 Million to develop and market the company’s 2026 – 2027 modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections)?

Example: HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., wrote and issued a “new” charter for the CDC’s ACIP panel (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) in April 2026. This was after Federal Brian E. Murphy disbanded the former ACIP panel, every recommendation made by this panel from June 2025 to March 2026, and re-instituted the old CDC Childhood and Adolescent Immunization Schedule that has a total of 72 “vaccine” injections to be administered to children age 0 up to age 18. HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., is an attorney. However, it appears that he was not either informed of, or paying attention to, the minutiae of drawing up federal regulations. The result is that the “new” ACIP charter was quietly withdrawn in May 2026 (https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/vaccines/121349, “HHS Withdraws New Rules for CDC Vaccine Panel”, Terrence Rudd, 19 May 2026); and, replaced it with yet another “new” ACIP panel charter (https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/childhood-vaccines/new-acip-charter-could-allow-rfk-jr-further-restrict-vaccine-access-critics-say, Liz Szabo, MA, 26 June 2026.)

Meanwhile, the re-instituted old CDC Childhood and Adolescent “vaccination” schedule — the one that “recommends” 72 total “vaccine” injections in children age 0 to age 18 — is here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html. There is a mealy-mouthed “we’re sorry, but we have to do this because a Federal Judge ordered us to” CDC “excuse” on this webpage, above the immunization schedule hyperlink. And, recalling that it was the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) which sued HHS and won, via the “ruling” of Federal Judge Brian E. Murphy in March 2026 — take a look at the current CDC VFC Vaccine Price List: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-for-children/pdfs/2026/06/Pediatric-VFC-Vaccine-Price-List-06-16-2026.pdf. Pediatricians who inject children with the “vaccines” on the VFC List will get compensated according to the Price List (via the billing codes they send to the patients’ insurance company, and/or to CMS.) The ruling by Judge Murphy is discussed here: https://www.risehealth.org/insights-articles/federal-judge-stops-hhs-cdc-vaccine-policy-overhaul/, Ilene MacDonald, 17 March 2026. The “Recommended Immunization Schedule” for children and adolescents that was issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics (which closely “mirrors” the old CDC immunization schedule) is here: https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/AAP-Immunization-Schedule.pdf.

The American Medical Association (AMA) has championed the development and use of the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” since early 2021. The AMA is the most powerful medical organization lobby in both houses of Congress. The AMA devotes entire sections of its “guidance” to physicians to “combating misinformation” about these “vaccines” (in other words, fighting the spread of the real truth of the dangers and deadliness of these “vaccines”; training physicians on how to “convince” the “vaccine-hesitant” patient to agreeing to have these “vaccines” injected into them; and so on.) Two examples of AMA publications on these topics: https://www.ama-assn.org/public-health/infectious-diseases/covid-19-vaccines-guide-physicians (scroll down to the “Read now” link and click); and, https://www.ama-assn.org/topics/vaccines-vaccinations-immunizations.

And, more corroboration that Big Pharma and the federal government are intent on poisoning Americans with “vaccines” (especially American children): https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/democide-update-if-all-vaccines-are, “DEMOCIDE UPDATE: If ALL Vaccines are Unsafe and Ineffective, Then Why Are They Being Foisted on Humanity?”, 28 June 2026.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The following is not intended to blame persons who were gaslighted, coerced, or “mandated” into taking the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections.) A multi-level, planned, extremely sophisticated, orchestrated program was implemented by governments and official entities all over the world, to ensure that the maximum number of persons on Earth would be injected with these “vaccines.” Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/01/31/health-friday-1-31-2025-open-thread-hhs-gaslighting-and-propaganda-to-increase-vaccines-uptake/. However, the evidence is now a Tsunami of information proving that these “vaccines” (gene-therapy injections) are dangerous and deadly. Only one example: the rising incidence of “turbo cancer” among COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons:

🚨 SHOCKING VIDEO BOMBSHELL from Prof. Angus Dalgleish (World-Renowned Oncologist):

“People cleared of Cancer FOR YEARS start relapsing — they ALL had been given the COVID Boosters.” “It’s simple — Boosters repress T-Cells and CANCERS go up with each VACCINE.”

T-cell exhaustion… pic.twitter.com/90vGgcfVO6
— Dr. Dawn Michael (@DawnsMission) June 28, 2026

Yours Truly thanks Brave and Free for this link.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If a reader of today’s offering is a COVID-19 “vaccinated” medical professional / licensed healthcare provider: Stop “recommending”, let alone administering, these gene-therapy injections. Stop taking these “vaccines” yourself. Stop your family from taking them. Recognize that all COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons (including “vaccinated” medical professionals / healthcare providers) have had their natural immune system damaged or even destroyed by the ingredients and mechanisms of these “vaccines” (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/, by Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH; search “immune system”; https://jessicar.substack.com/, by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD; search “class switch.”) Read the post-authorization report from Pfizer-BioNTech that the company gave to the FDA in early 2021 regarding the reports of over 1,200 medical conditions, diseases, and serious negative side effects (including death) in persons who were injected with BNT162b2 (FDA approved under the name COMIRNATY): https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, date-stamped by the FDA on 30 April 2021. Have the courage to put yourself, COVID-19 “vaccinated” family, and COVID-19 “vaccinated” patients, on a protocol to try and mitigate / reduce the damage that the spike protein in these injections have already done to the body. One example of protocols to search: https://www.twc.health; The Wellness Company, Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH. Another example: https://imahealth.org/treatment-protocols/ (the Independent Medical Alliance website.) Other entities also provide COVID-19 spike protein detox items: search “COVID-19 spike protein detox protocol” on the Internet. There are certain foods that can assist in spike protein detoxification: for examples of these foods, and also for natural spike protein detox advice, please see: https://drwillcole.com/spike-protein-detox-functional-medicine/; and, https://www.417integrativemedicine.com/articles/the-role-of-nutrition-and-detoxification-in-spike-protein-removal. Note: Yours Truly is not endorsing any particular COVID-19 spike protein detox / removal protocol; I am merely listing some ideas for interested readers to search for themselves. The point is to find ways to safely detox/or remove the spike protein from the body; or, at the least, to minimize the spike protein’s negative effects.

If a reader of today’s offering who is not a medical professional, or a healthcare provider, but who is COVID-19 “vaccinated”: Stop taking the injections. Do not allow your family to be COVID-19 “vaccinated.” Recognize that the spike protein in these injections already in the body have damaged or destroyed the natural immune system; have damaged the heart muscle / cardiovascular system, and the lungs; have altered the DNA in the LINE1 liver cells; have crossed the Blood-Brain Barrier and damaged both the physical (Central Nervous System) and the psychological (learning, memory, and emotional control) mechanisms of the brain. Please see above for information regarding getting on a spike protein detox protocol. The same applies to COVID-19 “vaccinated” family members. For more information about the damage that these injections have done, please visit the links above; and, also, https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD; https://www.theqtree.com/author/pavaca/ (search “LINE1”; “Blood-Brain Barrier”; and, “neurological.”)

For those who are not COVID-19 “vaccinated” (and also in those who are “vaccinated”), there is the potential for “shedding” from these “vaccines” from those who are “vaccinated”, onto other persons. Yours Truly has not advocated, nor is advocating, that the non-“vaccinated” live like “anchorites in the desert”: this is simply not possible. However, there is justifiable room for being cautious. It is up to the individual to determine what “being cautious” means. Having a healthy natural immune system is important. Taking care of health issues when they arise is important. Following a healthy diet and exercise program is important. Having Ivermectin and/or Hydroxycholorquine — Vitamin D — Quercetin — Zinc — among other items — on hand, and using them, is important. Please see: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences, 7 June 2024.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Good health is Health Freedom. The ability to decide what constitutes good health, and what to do to support and maintain good health, is Health Freedom. There are times when choosing this freedom comes with a price. The individual gets to decide if that price is worth paying. But how is this freedom affected when health is compromised? What if a person has a condition that negatively affects movement, or the heart, or the lungs, or the eyesight, or the emotional/psychological region — then what? In Yours Truly’s opinion, based on personal experience, the “then what?” becomes finding a balance between doing all one can to ameliorate / support the compromised area(s) — perhaps even finding ways to cure these, if that is a possibility; and strengthening the areas which are not compromised. One believes that a healthy natural immune system is an important key to the whole: along with inner determination, and a positive connection with a Higher Power / Supreme Being.

As the United States of America begins celebrations for the 250th anniversary of her founding, please, consider Health Freedom becoming a part of one’s life.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are by PAVACA (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 6.5.2026 Open Thread: Betrayal by the FDA?

The vintage image of FDA items is courtesy of Hillerman Film and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications by our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers, wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Betrayal by the FDA?

Yours Truly begins here: https://www.thekingstonreport.com/p/fda-drops-placebo-controlled-trial, “FDA Drops Placebo-Controlled Trial Requirement for NEW mRNA Vaccines”, Karen Kingston, 28 May 2026. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

The “vaccine” that the FDA will meeting about regarding review of the BLA application from Moderna of, is none other than mRNA-1010, the company’s modRNA influenza “vaccine” that is other component of the company’s “holy grail vaccine” — mRNA-1083 (mCOMBRIAX.) mCOMBRIAX is a “combo-vaccine” of mRNA-1010 plus mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE, Moderna’s modRNA “lite” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.) . mCOMBRIAX is already approved for use in the European Union. Yours Truly exposed the situation regarding mRNA-1083 (mCOMBRIAX), and the maneuvering by Moderna to get the product FDA-approved for use in the United States: first, mRNA-1010 (mCOMBRIAX): https://www.theqtree.com/2026/02/27/health-friday-2-27-2026-open-thread-modernas-mrna-1010-and-the-end-run-around-hhs-secretary-kennedy-jr-part-one/; https://www.theqtree.com/2026/03/06/health-friday-3-6-2026-open-thread-modernas-mrna-1010-and-the-end-run-around-hhs-secretary-keenedy-jr-part-two/. Second, Yours Truly exposed mNEXSPIKE (mRNA-1283; the other component of mRNA-1083, mCOMBRIAX): https://www.theqtree.com/2026/03/13/health-friday-3-13-2026-open-thread-meet-modernas-mrna-1283-mnexspike-the-other-component-of-mrna-1083-mcombriax-part-one/; https://www.theqtree.com/2026/03/20/health-friday-3-20-2026-open-thread-meet-modernas-mrna-1283-mnexspike-the-other-component-of-mrna-1083-mcombriax-part-two/. The “TD;LR” of the above links this screenshot from this source (the European Medicines Agency Assessment and Recommendation report on mCOMBRIAX, found here: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/mcombriax-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf, 26 February 2026):

The “TD;LR” summary of the mRNA-1010 situation in the United States: Moderna is desperate to get FDA approval for this modRNA “influenza vaccine”, so the company can proceed to finish getting mCOMBRIAX also FDA-approved. The backstory on this situation is outlined here: https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/articles/pfizer-vs-moderna-mrna-patent-strategies-and-pipelines/, updated 2 April 2026. A screenshot from this article is below:

However, Moderna has ALREADY applied for a Patent for mRNA-1010: https://patents.google.com/patent/EP4274607A1/en; title: “Seasonal rna influenza virus vaccines.” The Patent application was submitted on 10 January 2022. The current Status of the application is “Pending.” By the way, the Patent claims state that as many as SEVEN different types of influenza virus strains can be used in the formulation of mRNA-1010. Also notice that the Patent application was filed back in January 2022: this means that the laboratory work to perform the experiments, aggregate data, analyze the data, and so on, was begun years before the application submission.

However, Moderna has ALREADY applied for a Trade Mark (TM) for mRNA-1010, under the brand name mFLUSIVA. The application was submitted on 27 February 2026: https://uspto.report/TM/99674080. **** It was on 26 February 2026 that the European Medicines Agency (cited above) recommended the use of mCOMBRIAX (mFLUSIVA + mNEXSPIKE combination “vaccine”) in the European Union.

The VRBPAC panel of the FDA will meet on 18 June 2026 to consider the use of mRNA-1010 (mFLUSIVA) in the United States: https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-june-18-2026-meeting-announcement. The current member roster of the VRBPAC panel is listed here: https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee; current roster as of 19 May 2026. The Chair position is “Vacant.” This meeting appears to be the “meeting with outside experts” that the Kingston Report is referring to (cited above.)

It appears that, in Yours Truly’s opinion, Moderna is performing “all the right moves” in order to ensure that mRNA-1010 (mFLUSIVA) is approved by the FDA for use in the United States as soon as possible. This includes, apparently, maneuvering to have Dr. Vinay Prasad (who refused the BLA application for mRNA-1010 in February 2026) removed from his position at the FDA. Per the Kingston Report, cited above:

This “FDA meeting with Moderna” was the “Type A” meeting that Yours Truly wrote about in the Health Friday posts cited above.

Does the reader see how the game is played by Big Pharma? It appears that Moderna will not allow anyone to interfere with the company’s goal of getting mRNA-1010 (mFLUSIVA) through the FDA approval process and have the injectable ready for the United States 2026-2027 “flu season market”; and, also, that Moderna will not allow anyone to interfere with the company’s goal of getting mRNA-1083 (mCOMBRIAX) through the FDA approval process and have the injectable ready for the United States market as soon as possible.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items in today’s offering that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are by PAVACA. Credit must be given to PAVACA if the ideas and/or opinions of today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 5.15.2026 Open Thread: MV Hondius, Hantavirus, and the End Game

The free header image of the Andes Mountains for today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is not an elegant, “gardens of Versailles”-type layout. There are many items to consider. This is an evolving situation: details, news items, and so on, multiply by the day. There are a few relevant screenshots / images below. Yours Truly’s opinion is:

Those who **planned** for the COVID-19 bioweapon virus itself, followed by the COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, to perform the task of immediately/within a short amount of time, culling the population of the Earth down to a “manageable” number of approximately 500 million persons (per the late Ted Turner) — and, finding that this task was not performed “properly” — have resorted to a “Plan B”: using an outbreak of the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) on the MV Hondius as the excuse to generate a new “plandemic”, complete with gaslighting/fear operations, calls for “masking”, “lockdowns”, “vaccination”, and more. There may be other new”plandemic” measures in the wings. This new “plandemic” takes advantage of the weakened / destroyed immune systems in persons who are “vaccinated” with COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” Many of the same actors in the COVID-19 disaster are involved with this Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) new “plandemic” rollout: the WHO; the CDC; USAMRIID; Fort Detrick; Big Pharma; Big Donors (Gates Foundation) — among others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

By now, the news regarding the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) outbreak on the cruise ship MV Hondius has spread around the entire internet. A summary of important information on this situation can be found here: https://science.org/content/article/cruise-ship-s-hantavirus-outbreak-puts-researchers-uncharted-territory, 5 May 2026; and, https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/psyop-26-scamdemic-emergency-alert — which leads to these:

From The Hill: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5869488-cdc-hantavirus-outbreak-low-emergency-cdc/; which then led to this: https://nypost.com/2026/05/08/world-news/cdc-classifies-hantavirus-outbreak-as-a-level-3-emergency-response-report/, Zoe Hassan and Chris Bradford; which now leads to this: the official CDC HAN (Health Alert Network) notice: https://www.cdc.gov/han/php/notices/han00528.htm, “2026 Multi-country Hantavirus Cluster Linked to Cruise Ship”, 8 May 2026. If it is true that the CDC considers this Hantavirus outbreak to be a “Level 3 emergency” (the lowest level), then WHY does the HAN notice cited above have THIS?:

If readers suspect that the above sounds like a “rerun” of the COVID-19 virus PPE (Personal Protection Equipment) CDC recommendations — that is correct.

WHY, if it is the case that the Hantavirus outbreak on the MV Hondius is so concerning, did the WHO (World Health Organization) facilitate the IMMEDIATE RELEASE of the passengers from the ship to be “assessed” when the vessel docked at the Canary Islands? https://armageddonprose.substack.com/p/who-inexplicably-immediately-releases, “WHO Inexplicably, Immediately Releases All Passengers on Hantavirus Cruise Ship Without Quarantine”, 8 May 2026. The video announcement about this situation by Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus, Director General of the WHO, is below:

WHO announces plan to fly #hantavirus cruise passengers all around the globe in order to milk the terror for all its worth pic.twitter.com/TnDh6XCq6W
— Ben Bartee (@BenBartee) May 8, 2026

Especially since it can take as long as 42 days post-exposure to the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) for symptoms to appear? If readers are “starting to smell a rat”, that would be correct. If readers’ “interior antennae” are starting to register, “This feels like the start of the COVID lockdowns and “mandates” again, but now it’s Hantavirus”, that also would be correct.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

There is, currently, one vaccine against Hantavirus, an “inactivated” injectable called Hantavax (per Wikipedia.) It is only available for use in South Korea. Hantavax is not approved for use in other countries. There are, however, numerous “vaccines” against Hantavirus that are in development. Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, of The McCullough Foundation, notes that thirteen Hantavirus “vaccines” are currently under investigation: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/why-ivermectin-and-hydroxychloroquine, “Why Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine Could Work for Hantavirus”, 8 May 2026. Per Mr. Hulscher’s 6 May 2026 article on this situation, there are: 6 DNA-based “vaccines” (USAMRIID); 3 mRNA-based “vaccines” (Moderna; Communist China; Canada); 2 “viral vector vaccines” (UK; Canada); 1 “inactivated vaccine” (the Hantavax injectable, South Korea, in use there only); 1 “protein subunit vaccine” (Canada.) Note that the majority of the Hantavirus “vaccines” in development are under the aegis of the US Army (USAMRIID) — which indicates that the Department of War is involved. (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-vaccine-cartel-and-us-army-are, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 6 May 2026.)

The “situational briefing” from neodrop.ai on the current Hantavirus situation is here: https://neodrop.ai/feed/10x3geiL3Sz, “Hantavirus Global Situational Briefing — May 9, 2026.” Below, from the article, is the graphic regarding the “pipeline” of Hantavirus “vaccines” and antivirals in development:

Yours Truly found the USAMRIID Hantavirus “vaccine” clinical trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04333459, “Safety and Immunogenicity of a Hantaan Virus DNA Vaccine and a Puumala Virus DNA Vaccine, For the Prevention of Hemorrhagic Fever With Renal Syndrome.” Per the Clinical Trials website, NCT04333459 is “Unknown status. Last known status: Recruiting.” The Study Start was 23 August 2021; the Study Completion (Estimated) was to be 31 December 2023. The Puumala virus (PUUV) is another form of Hantavirus; it infects persons in Scandinavia, Russia, and other countries.

BUT — the clinical study NCT03443459, which led this THIS paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11570633/, “Phase 1 clinical trial of Hantaan and Puumala virus DNA vaccines delivered by needle-free injection”, Jay W Hooper, et al.; 17 November 2024: which study and paper were funded by USAMRIID, and conducted by USAMRIID personnel (Hooper, et al., above): is ACTUALLY a paper about an EARLIER study, NCT02776761 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02776761, “A Single-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of a Hantaan Puumala Virus DNA Vaccine”), which ended on 27 September 2017. Digging into the details for NCT02776761, it appears that Jay W Hooper owns two Patents for Hantavirus and for Puumala “vaccines”: US8183358B2 and US7217812B2, both of which were assigned to USAMRIID. However, it appears that the Patent for US7217812B2 is “Status: Expired – Lifetime” as of 2 October 2021. If this is the case, why does it appear that this Patent “vaccine” formulation for the Puumala virus used in the clinical trial NCT04333459? This, however, did not stop Mr. Hooper from publishing yet another paper on the same topic: https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/229/1/30/7209758, “Safety and Immunogenicity of an Andes Virus DNA Vaccine by Needle-Free Injection: A Randomized, Controlled Phase I Study”; Jay W Hooper, et al. 28 June 2023. Except that, for this paper, there was also funding via HHS / NIH: Grant number HHS 272201300016I. Which indicates involvement with HHS grants funding and US military funding for biolab work at Fort Detrick.

HOWEVER — and this is a big HOWEVER — there IS a modRNA-based “Hantavirus vaccine” that has gone beyond “development”: a lab-created “vaccine” was PATENTED in 2025 by researchers at the University of Texas, Austin. A “vaccine” that’s ready to be “tested” and either granted an EUA from the FDA, or be “approved” by the FDA. The team of researchers at the University of Texas, Austin, was led by Dr. Jason McLellan, PhD (who may, in Yours Truly’s opinion, be considered as “The Successor to Ralph Baric” in terms of using Gain-of-Function experiments to lab-create viruses and “vaccine” templates.) Dr. McLellan’s Gain-of-Function based research on the COVID-19 virus spike protein was used by Pfizer-BioNTech, by Moderna, and by Novavax, in the development of these companies’ COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_McLellan

Yours Truly dug into Dr. McLellan’s modRNA-based Hantavirus “vaccine” Patent. The Patent document is here: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20250127870A1/en, “mRNA Vaccines Against Hantavirus”, published 24 April 2025. The first application for this Patent was filed on 15 September 2022. Current status is “Pending.” The Patent may be summarized as the “invention” of a Gain-of-Function produced, modRNA-platform based “vaccine” that has an artificial “cleavage area” between the Gn and Gc proteins, which proteins are used as the “antigens” for the “vaccine.”

But it goes much deeper than just the above. The “meat” of the descriptions of the multiple ingredients and combinations for this “Hantavirus vaccine” are found along the left side of the Patent Description list (not the “Claims” list, which is on the right side of the document.) The Description list is numbered. Without going too far “into the weeds”, some of the more striking Description items on the list follow. If readers think that the Patent for BNT162b2 describes a “witches’ brew”, this “Hantavirus Vaccine” Patent, in Yours Truly’s’ opinion, goes far beyond (Bolding is mine):

#0019: Adenosine is replaced with N6-methyladenosine (also known as “m6a”) “to evade the host innate immunity and improve the translation.” [of the other ingredients of the “vaccine.”] Adenosine is one of the four “building blocks” of RNA. Please see: https://www.alidabio.com/blog-post/m6a_minor_modification_major_impact/, by Zachary Miles.)

#0033: Confirms the use of the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) as the basis for the “vaccine.”

#0041: Formulation list of adjuvants: this list includes dozens of types of adjuvants that can be used in the “Hantavirus vaccine.” One such adjuvant, JVRS-100, is a cationic lipid DNA compound; another adjuvant is Cholera toxin. A screenshot of part of the adjuvants list is below:

#0046 and #0049: The “Hantavirus vaccine” can be used as a “primary” and as a “booster” injectable.

#0047: Routes of administration: can used as an injectable, an intranasal, etc.

#0048: The “Hantavirus vaccine” can contain AZT (zidovudine), used in treating HIV/AIDS.

#0057: This section of the Description is the “justification” for using Gain-of-Function.

#0092: IRES Sequences. This is important. IRES = internal ribosome entry site. Ribosomes are combinations of RNA and proteins. Ribosomes are where protein synthesis occurs in a cell. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Ribosome. One of the main goals of the “Hantavirus vaccine” is to “hijack” and change / replace RNA in the body of the person who takes this “vaccine.” In this “Hantavirus vaccine”, some of the IRES Sequences that can be used come from: the Coxsackie virus (CVB3); the Polio virus (PV); Foot and Mouth Disease virus (FMDVD); Simian Immune Deficiency viruses (SIV.)

#00128: from the Pharmaceutical Compositions section: This “Hantavirus vaccine” can be administered to humans / non-human primates / mammals / birds and poultry.

#0143 – 0144: List of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that be used in the “vaccine.” Examples of the LNPs that can be used in this “Hantavirus vaccine” include: DODMA (https://www.medchemexpress.com/dodma.html); the description clearly states, “For research use only); and, DOXIL (a form of the anticancer drug, doxorubicin: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/doxil.) There are MULTIPLE other types of LNPs that are listed in sections #0143 – 0144. This also proves that this “Hantavirus vaccine” can contain at least ONE cancer treatment drug.

#0159: This “Hantavirus vaccine” can be used in “Multi-Dose & Repeat Dose Administration.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yours Truly turns to the “lockstep, orchestrated gaslighting and fear COVID-19 virus campaign redone as Hantavirus” situation that is unfolding. Please see: https://maninamerica.substack.com/p/cp/197274890, “Hantavirus, Plandemics & Pre-Made Vaccines…Do You See It?”, 11 May 2026. The writer describes the various methods and actors being used to create a new “plandemic” of Hantavirus. Please also see: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/virus-in-the-dust-exposing-the-fabricated, “Virus in the Dust: Exposing the Fabricated Contagion of Andes Hantavirus”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, 10 May 2026.

HOWEVER — and this is another BIG HOWEVER — there is something ELSE in play here: the COVID-19 modRNA bioweapon “vaccines”, the damage / destruction these do to the immune system of the “vaccinated” person, and the documented THOUSANDS of serious adverse side effects and events (including death) from these “vaccines.”

Look at Page 33 (Page 4 of the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section) of https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports“, given by Pfizer-BioNTech to the FDA on 30 April 2021. Please see the screenshot below, part of Page 33:

There it is: “Hantavirus pulmonary infection;…” This is NOT a Hantavirus infection WITHOUT lung involvement. Such NON-pulmonary Hantavirus infections CAN occur. The symptoms include: fever, chills, headache, GI symptoms — but NO cardio-pulmonary symptoms (https://www.azdhs.gov/documents/preparedness/epidemiology-disease-control/investigation-manual/vectorborne/hantavirus-protocol.pdf.) A screenshot from this article is below:

Does this mean that some BNT162b2 (approved by the FDA under the name COMIRNATY) “vaccinated” person(s) traveled to a place where the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) is found, stayed there, had close / prolonged contact with infected rat droppings/saliva, or with a person there who was already infected with the Andes Hantavirus, THEN got positive test results for this virus?

OR — does it mean that BNT162b2 has elements of the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) INCLUDED in the formulation?

OR — does it mean that the husband and wife who were bird-watching in Argentina, in a place where infected rats are prone to be, THEN the husband boards the MV Hondius, shows symptoms of ANDV infection and dies onboard, AND whose wife (who was NOT on board) ALSO becomes ill with ANDV infection and dies onshore, AND who were both COVID-19 “vaccinated” (therefore, their immune systems were badly damaged by said “vaccinations”) — had some kind of “activation” of ANDV infectious elements that were present in their COVID-19 “vaccinated” bodies: an “activation” which occurred while they were bird watching?

OR — is USAMRIID somehow involved here?:

Just to clarify @AnneliseBocquet…

This is a non-transmissible organism.
98% synonymous mutations.
1 amino acid is not going to make it transmissible and cross species.
The whole story is theatre.

BUT
The origin of this hantavirus (assuming this is the cause of the… https://t.co/ri54ijOXnK pic.twitter.com/xZSHrhPNX3
— Jikkyleaks 🐭 (@Jikkyleaks) May 13, 2026

OR — is it some combination of all of the above?

Jikkyleaks thinks that USAMRIID “seeded” the virus on board the MV Hondius. A further discussion of the entire situation, including what Jikkyleaks tweeted, is on Dr. Jessica Rose’s blog: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/is-andv-hanta-natural-spillover-or, “Is ANDV hanta natural spillover or lab design?”, 13 May 2026.

And, WHY did the captain of the MV Hondius permit the body of the husband who DIED of an ANDV infection ON BOARD the vessel to REMAIN on board for TWO WEEKS, until it was offloaded, instead of performing a respectful, but IMMEDIATE, burial at sea? Why did the captain of the MV Hondius permit the body of the German woman who DIED of an ANDV infection CAUGHT ON BOARD to REMAIN on board for EIGHT DAYS? Again, WHY was there no respectful, but IMMEDIATE, burial at sea of this deceased woman’s body? No matter what “morgue-like” conditions these bodies were held in on board the MV Hondius, the corpses potentially exposing MULTIPLE persons on the ship to ANDV infection (think enclosed air-circulation system).

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The following articles are, in Yours Truly’s opinion, must-read items. The information in these articles point in the same general direction: there may be a new “plandemic” on the horizon (Andes Hantavirus [ANDV]); combined with “the usual suspects” rushing to, at the same time, implement some combination of COVID-19 disaster-style “lockdowns”, “masking”, “vaccines” development (and potential “mandated vaccination” schemes), plus control of information and coordination with compliant media to gaslight/frighten the general public:

From Kit Knightly: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026/05/13/hantavirus-a-pendemic-treaty-wake-up-call/. Mr. Knightly calls attention to the fact that the WHO does not yet have a “worldwide pandemic treaty” signed and locked into place. The paper cited by Mr. Knightly, which discusses the very low risk of Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) being transmitted person-to-person, is here: https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-pdf/226/8/1362/46542793/jiab461.pdf, “Evidence for Human-to-Human Transmission of Hantavirus: A Systemic Review”; Joao Toledo, et al. 15 October 2022. The paper is also found here: https://watermark02.silverchair.com/jiab461.pdf. Mr. Knightly makes the same recommendation that Yours Truly does: Interested persons should download this paper before it is taken away. A screenshot from the paper is below:

From Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/source-of-contagion-hantavirus-andv, “Source of Contagion, Hantavirus ANDV, on MV Hondius: Rodent Excreta, Possibly Infected Corpses on Board for 22 Days”, 14 May 2026. There is a video interview with Dr. McCullough in the article.

USAMRIID is involved in the Andes Hantavirus / ANDV situation up to the eyeballs and beyond: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/hantavirus-genome-was-built-from, “Hantavirus Genome Was Built From Human Blood at U.S. Military Biolab Fort Detrick Using Incomplete Computer Assembly and Reference Genome ‘Fill-Ins'”, 13 May 2026.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Which brings Yours Truly to one final item: the nomination of Dr. Erica Schwartz, MD, MPH, JD, as the next Director of the CDC. Dr. Schwartz, while serving in the U.S. Coast Guard as a physician, was also instrumental in the enforcement of the “military mandate” for all U.S. military personnel to be COVID-19 “vaccinated.” She is also called “the queen of vaccines.” If confirmed, Dr. Schwartz would be in a position to sign off on a CDC “recommendation” for an Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) and/or Puumala virus (PUUV) “vaccine” to be used on the general public in the United States. (https://www.theqtree.com/2026/05/08/health-friday-5-8-2026-open-thread-two-establishment-medicine-nominees-an-opinion-piece/)

Individual awareness and self-education, in Yours Truly’s opinion, are important aspects to the totality of the Andes Hantavirus (ANDV) / MV Hondius situation.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Disclaimer and Notice: With the exception of linked URLs and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA. Credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers, podcasters, or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 4.24.2026 Open Thread: The COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccines”: Why Are They Still In Use?, Part One: Pfizer-BioNTech (COMIRNATY)

The vintage image of a vaccination record from 1867 for today’s offering header is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; theRules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering begins here: https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, “MODULE 2.6.5 PHARMACOKINETICS TABULATED SUMMARY“, FDA Approved on 21 January 2021 at 23:22 GMT (Greenwich Mean Time.) This is the report regarding biodistribution data of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine”, BNT162b2, for which the FDA had granted the initial EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) for use in the United States on 11 December 2020. The experiments performed by Pfizer-BioNTech to produce the report, using BNT162b2 injections, were conducted on Wistar Han lab rats, Sprague Dawley lab rats, Cynomologus monkeys, and human liver microsomes and liver fractions. Data were extracted from in vivo and from in vitro results. The formulation of BNT162b2 used in the experiments was the same as that which was granted the FDA Emergency Use Authorization of 11 December 2020 for use on human beings in the United States.

Yours Truly presents images of page 7 and page 8 of this report:

Note: the above data are the results from the injections given to the Wistar Han lab rats. Note also the accumulations of the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), ALC-0159 and ALC-0315, used in the BNT162b2 formulation. Again, this is the same formulation that was granted the initial FDA Emergency Use Authorization on 11 December 2020, for BNT162b2 to be used on human beings in the United States. LNPs are the tiny fat molecules-based, lab-created “delivery system” that encases the “vaccine” ingredients to protect them from being detected and eliminated by the natural immune system of the body. Instead, the LNPs facilitate the entry of the “vaccine” into every cell of the body. Look at the highest accumulation amounts:

Adrenal Glands: 18.2. The adrenal glands release hormones, such as, adrenaline, directly into the bloodstream. These glands are crucial in the proper function of blood pressure and the body’s stress response. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/23005-adrenal-glands

Injection Site: 165. The injection of COMIRNATY into the arm of a human being results in the following: The body immediately sends “alarm signals” that there is an “enemy invader”, and starts the natural immune system process of fighting it / eliminating it. This is manifested in several ways, including: pain at the injection site, and/or a “rash” at the injection site. However, these immediate reactions can also indicate early-warning signals of anaphylactic shock — and must be closely monitored. Establishment Medicine explains this away by, first, stating that this reaction is “rare”, then proceeding to minimize the situation: https://ubiehealth.com/doctors-note/rash-after-covid-vaccine-causes-serious-warning-49121exp1, “Why do some people get a rash after the COVID vaccine and when is it serious?”, Yoshinori Abe, MD, 17 December 2025. This situation is called “COVID Arm.” In fact, Establishment Medicine minimizes “COVID Arm” reaction even if it occurs DAYS or a WEEK after “vaccination”: https://medlineplus.gov/ency/imagepages/19970.htm. “Arm Rash After COVID-19 Vaccination”, updated by Linda J. Vorvick MD, 1 January 2025.)

Liver: 24.3. This incredibly important organ performs five hundred different functions in the body to maintain health. https://www.michiganmedicine.org/health-lab/what-does-the-liver-do-and-how-do-i-keep-mine-healthy

Ovaries: 12.3. The female ovaries make and release eggs for fertilization. They also produce hormones. At birth, a female has all the eggs that she will ever have. The ovaries constantly “communicate” with the brain. https://axiawh.com/resources/5-things-you-didnt-know-about-your-ovaries/

Spleen: 23.4. The spleen creates white blood cells and stores red blood cells. It helps to regulate blood platelets (which assists in proper blood clotting.) It filters out old or damaged blood cells. https://www.healthline.com/health/what-does-the-spleen-do

The above report, in Yours Truly’s opinion, needs to be required reading for any healthcare professional who is still “recommending”, let alone administering, COMIRNATY. And, in case a healthcare professional raises objections, such as, “The new COMIRNATY formula is different”, the facts that ALC-0159, ALC-0315, N1-Methylpseudouridine (all which were in the original BNT162b2 formulation), and the S1 spike protein (that can be traced back to the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 strain) are ingredients in the “2025-2026 COMIRMATY” version of the injectable.

There is a reason behind why the accumulations of ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 are so high for the above body areas and organs: these lipid nanoparticles ensure that the ingredients and mechanisms of COMIRNATY enter these areas and organs: with the result that said areas and organs are interfered with, and/or damaged, and/or that the body’s ability to properly use them is destroyed. Example: over 60% of the lifetime supply of a female lab rat’s eggs are either damaged or destroyed due to it being “vaccinated” with COMIRNATY: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-covid-19-mrna-shots-destroy, “BREAKING: COVID-19 mRNA Shots Destroy Over 60% of Female Non-Renewable Egg Supply”, Nicolas Hulscher, 9 May 2025. If this is what happens with female Wistar lab rats being injected with these “vaccines”, the potential for damage to human female eggs is ALSO THERE: and, in fact, the Manniche, et al., study demonstrates this: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202504.2487/v1, “Rates of Successful Conceptions According to COVID-19 Vaccination Status: Data from the Czech Republic”, Vibeke Manniche, et al., 29 April 2025. Note: this paper is a preprint — therefore, it can be Removed, Retracted, or Withdrawn at any time. Yours Truly urges interested readers to download or otherwise archive this paper.

Before leaving the discussion of ALC-0159 and ALC-0315, please see the following images from the MSDS Safety Sheets for these lipid nanoparticles, below. First, from https://cdn.caymanchemical.com/cdn/msds/34336m.pdf, for ALC-0159:

And, from https://cdn.caymanchemical.com/cdn/msds/34337m.pdf, for ALC-0315:

Note that both compounds are for research only. In fact, both compounds rate as a carcinogen (ethanol content.) In particular, the Cayman Chemcial MSDS for ALC-0315 reads like a textbook example of a very dangerous compound.

**** Note from the images of Page 7 and Page 8 above, that BNT162b2 crosses the Blood-Brain Barrier, as seen in the accumulation data images above: the “vaccine” accumulates in the Brain and in the Pituitary Gland. In addition, there is BNT162b2 accumulation in the Skin and in the Kidneys — this indicates that the “vaccine” ingredients can be “shed” from the skin and/or excreted via the kidneys into urine.

The Appendix 1: List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of this report about BNT162b2, also given to the FDA by Pfizer-BioNTech (April 2021) has the reports listings of over 1,200 serious / fatal side effects induced by this “vaccine.” The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021“, FDA date-stamped 30 April 2021 at 09:26 GMT. This, in Yours Truly’s opinion, also needs to be required reading for any healthcare professional who is still “recommending”, let alone administering, COMIRNATY.

The COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” are actually gene-altering injectable therapies: they are not, strictly speaking, vaccines. Please see: https://academic,oup.com/intimm/article/33/10/521/6194108, “Development of COVID-19 vaccines utilizing gene therapy technology”, Hironori Nakagami, 27 March 2021. Every single person who has ever taken an injection of COMIRNATY has had a gene-altering therapy “cocktail” (under the guise of “it’s a vaccine”) injected into their body: something that “vaccinated” persons were never told about, nor for which they never explicitly granted permission to have put into their body.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is not being allowed to do his job — and, in fact, to quote another blog writer, he is being “muzzled.” The COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” have been, via the American Academy of Pediatrics lawsuit and subsequent “ruling” by Federal Judge Brian E. Murphy, are now fully back into the CDC Childhood Immunization Schedule. The new nominee to head the CDC, Dr. Erica Schwartz, is an Establishment Medicine “vaccine” proponent: https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/the-queen-of-mandating-vaccines, 18 April 2026. A screenshot from this article is below:

Please also see: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/iatrocide-by-design-rfk-jr-bombshell, “Iatrocide by Design: RFK Jr. Bombshell: “They had to DESTROY Ivermectin and Hydroxychoroquine…” “, 23 April 2026. A screenshot from the latter article is below:

The linked tweet from the above article:

THIS SHOULD BE HEADLINE NEWS.

RFK Jr. drops the truth bomb on the COVID era: “They had to DESTROY ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine… because if they admitted it worked for ANYONE, the entire $200 BILLION vaccine enterprise would have COLLAPSED.”pic.twitter.com/rEEjSXrYPf
— Dr. Dawn Michael (@DawnsMission) April 4, 2026

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

THERE IS NO PLACE IN THE HUMAN BODY FOR AN mRNA, A modRNA, AN saRNA, OR A taRNA PRODUCT OF ANY KIND.

THERE MUST BE MUCH MORE RESEARCH INTO THESE DELIVERY PLATFORMS, WITH EXTENSIVE TESTING AND DATA ANALYSES, AND WITH THE RESULTS BEING MADE PUBLIC.

THE COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “VACCINES” (GENE-THERAPY INJECTIONS) — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE IN THE UNITED STATES. NOW.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for URLs and other items that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA for ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers, by podcasters, or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 4.10.2026 Open Thread: Some Interesting Links

The header image of the word Interesting for today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications form our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which the reader should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering are cited as such. if readers wish to post AI-generated items to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Some Interesting Links:

Regarding the November 2025 exposure of an employee at the Rocky Mountain Lab (part of the NIH) to the Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever virus. The virus is being experimented on at this facility. Our good Aubergine posted a comment on this situation, which began a discussion: https://theqtree.com/2026/04/03/health-friday-4-3-2026-open-thread-where-the-focus-needs-to-be-now-an-opinion-piece/#comment-1595800. It has been proven that this virus does indeed shed; the shedding can be present in the body secretions and blood of the exposed / infected person. The published paper regarding shedding of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever virus is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7078823/, “Monitoring Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus RNA shedding in a body secretions and serological status in hospitalized patients, Turkey, 2015.” Dilek Yagci-Caglayik, et al. 12 March 2020. (Yours Truly: While the paper is about the shedding of this virus in hospitalized patients, it, in my opinion, opens up the possibility that the virus can shed from non-hospitalized exposed or infected persons.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In Maryland, if a newly-proposed law there comes into effect, pharmacists will be able to order certain “vaccines” for patients; while, at the same time, placing the names of those persons into the Maryland state database for immunization tracking: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/maryland-bill-lets-pharmacists-order, “Maryland Bill Lets Pharmacists Order Vaccines for You — Logging Your Name in State Tracking System Without Any Patient-Request Requirement”, 3 April 2026. A screenshot from this article is below:

Note that this bill regards pharmacists being granted permission to order vaccines — and to do so without the patient’s knowledge, consent, or request. The name of the patient is put into a state tracking database. The vaccines are paid for by private insurance (if the patient’s private insurance information is on file at the pharmacy), or are covered by Medicare/Medicaid. This opens up the potential for both the pharmacy and the state to “keep tabs” on the patient in order to get “vaccine compliance” from the patient.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Why hasn’t James Lloyd Austin, III, Secretary of Defense under former “President” Joe Biden, been held to account for his “mandating” over 90% of United States military personnel being “vaccinated” with modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”? https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-half-of-covid-19-vaccinated, “BREAKING STUDY: Half of COVID-19 Vaccinated Military Personnel Suffered Subclinical Heart Stress”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 31 March 2026. The paper cited in the article is here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128535, “Transient elevation of NT-proBNP after mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations in healthy adults: A longitudinal biomarker analysis.” Pavel Dlouhy, et al. 30 April 2026.

Note that this paper studies heart issues that appeared in 50% of 83 healthy, adult military personnel after their being “vaccinated” with either BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or with mRNA-1273 (Moderna.) The military personnel were stationed at the Air Transportation Base Facility in Prague, Czech Republic. The troponin levels of their hearts were found to have gone up. Elevated troponin levels in the heart indicate stress on the heart muscle. Elevated troponin levels can indicate heart problems even if there are no overt symptoms. If that is what occurred in half of the “vaccinated” personnel tested at an air transportation base in the Czech Republic, how many thousands of United States military personnel potentially had the same effect after they were “mandated” to be “vaccinated” by former Defense Secretary Austin? (Austin was the former Secretary of what is now called the Department of War.)

Note also that the military personnel at the air transportation base in Prague were well over the age of 17 — in fact, the mean age of the 83 tested personnel was 39 years. This blows clean out of the water ALL of the claims of Big Pharma, Establishment Medicine, the CDC, the FDA, the AMA, and many other entities, that heart problems associated with COVID-19 “vaccination” are “rare” —and, are “confined mostly to persons between the age of 12 and 17 years.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Another example of how a physician who stood up against Big Pharma, the CDC / FDA, the AMA, and the AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics), was persecuted: his License to Practice Medicine in his home state (Oregon) was suspended in 2020; then, his License to Practice Medicine was revoked in the state where he had been credentialed (Washington State); then, his board credentials in the AAP were revoked; then, he had to surrender his License to Practice Medicine in Oregon in 2022 (https://omb.oregon.gov/Clients/ORMB/Public/VerificationDetails.aspx, effective 5 December 2022.) This was the journey of Dr. Paul Thomas, a highly-respected pediatrician: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/doctor-published-study-showing-vaccinated, “Doctor Published Study Showing Vaccinated Children Have 500% Increase In Chronic Diseases Only To Have License Suspended & Get Cancelled By BigPharma”, 8 April 2026. The study was Retracted by MDPI, the preprint publisher. It is available here: https://www.researchgate.net/publications/346088816_Relative_Incidence_of_Office_Visits_and_Cuulative_Rates_of_Billed_Diagnoses_Along_the_Axis_of_Vaccination. James Lyons-Weiler, Paul Thomas. 22 November 2020. (Yours Truly: Note that this paper was accepted and peer-reviewed before it was published.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Dr. Peter A. McCullough addresses the nexus among cancer patients who then get COVID-19 “vaccinated” and thereupon afterwards present with symptoms of Long COVID: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-hollow-promise-of-protection, 7 April 2026. A screenshot from this article is below (access to the entire particle is for subscribers only):

The paper cited in the above article is here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2847136. “Postacute Sequelae Following Omicron COVID-19 in Patients With Cancer.” Ling En Wee, MPH, et al. 31 March 2026.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

A related topic to the heart issues situation found in the military personnel at the air transportation base in Prague who had been COVID-19 “vaccinated”: This one regards subclinical myocarditis/pericarditis in COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-paper-finds, “BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Paper Finds mRNA “Vaccines” Convey Silent Heart Damage—Presents Approach to Diagnosis and Management”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 31 December 2025. A screenshot from this paper is below:

The paper is found here: https://doi.org/10.1810/mra.v13i11.7078, “COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Subclinical Myopericarditis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management.” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc, PhD, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH. 30 November 2025.

Yours Truly: The above paper speaks to subclinical myocarditis/pericarditis in COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons — and makes it clear that, although many of the reported cases were found in “vaccinated” males under age 21, there were cases found in other “vaccinated” persons (male and female), and in other age groups. On the other hand, there is also the real phenomenon of “vaccine” shedding from “vaccinated” persons onto others, including onto non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. Who knows how many non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons (including children) have been exposed to the ingredients and mechanisms of these “vaccines” that induce heart problems? At the same time, there are other factors that need to be considered when talking about what engenders or aggravates heart issues. Examples of other factors can include, but are not limited to: chronic stress; hypertension; family history of / predisposition to, heart disease; and, COPD (https://www.ummhealth.org/health-library/copd-and-heart-disease.)

THERE IS NO PLACE IN THE HUMAN BODY FOR AN mRNA, A modRNA, AN saRNA, OR A taRNA PRODUCT OF ANY KIND, IN ANY FORM.

ALL GAIN-OF-FUNCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE UNITED STATES MUST BE STOPPED, NOW.

ALL COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “VACCINES” MUST BE PULLED OFF THE MARKET AND REMOVED FROM USE IN THE UNITED STATES, NOW.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 4.3.2026 Open Thread: Where the Focus Needs to Be Now: An Opinion Piece

The header image of FOCUS used for today’s offering is courtesy of Rio Salado College and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines. general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

To those who commemorate Passover; or, Holy Week, Good Friday and Easter Sunday: May the blessings of these observances be granted to you.

Yours Truly has posted dozens of articles on this board related to the COVID-19 bioweapon virus itself; and, to the COVID-19 bioweapon POISON “vaccines.” These articles have traced the origins of the virus itself; the development of the “vaccines”; the gaslighting and psyops techniques that have been used (and, are still being used) to frighten / suborn / coerce / “mandate”, billions of human beings into having these “vaccines” put into their body; the myriad of “vaccine”-induced or “vaccine”-aggravated illnesses, injuries, and disabilities that are presenting in “vaccinated” persons; the deaths caused by these “vaccines”; and more. https://www.theqtree.com/author/pavaca/.

To date, those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself; who lab-created the COVID-19 “vaccines”; who deliberately withheld important information about the virus itself, and about the “vaccines”, from then-President Donald Trump 45; who used the government (on all levels) to lock down millions of Americans for months to “stop the spread”, and to enforce “vaccination” on millions of Americans; who still inject thousands of Americans every day with these bioweapon POISON “vaccines” — have not been held to account. They have not been held account when they lied in sworn testimony before Congress (as did Dr. Anthony Fauci, when he stated in congressional testimony that he never knew or met Dr. Ralph Baric.) Please see: https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/fauci-discussed-gain-of-function-work-with-wuhan-collaborator-in-pandemics-earliest-days-emails-suggest/, by Emily Kopp, 21 February 2023.

It appears that the Department of Health and Human Services, along with its CDC and FDA divisions, are in the control of Big Pharma, Establishment Medicine organizations, and the Federal Judiciary. It appears that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is focused on “side bar” issues, such as revamping the “official government food pyramid chart”, and removing artificial colorings from foods, among other items. While these are good and worthy efforts in and of themselves, they detract from the absolute importance of immediately stopping all COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” use in the United States, and taking these “vaccines” off the market. The damage, illnesses, injuries, and deaths induced by these products are increasing; dozens of peer-reviewed scientific papers have proven that these serious and deadly effects, induced by these products, are real. Disability claims have been skyrocketing since the rollout of these products in 2021 — please see the charts compiled by Ed Dowd at https://phinancetechnologies.com/.

It appears that there is a “latest new variant” of the COVID-19 bioweapon virus itself, called BA.3.2, nicknamed “Cicada“, after the insect that stays underground for years before hatching and emerging into the atmosphere. This variant is a mutation of the earlier B.3 mutant of the SARS-CoV-2 bioweapon virus that “went out of circulation” in early 2022. However, it then “re-appeared” as BA.3.2 in a sample taken from a patient in South Africa in November 2024: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/75/wr/mm7510a1.htm, “Early Detection and Surveillance of the SARS-CoV-2 Variant BA.3.2”, 19 March 2026. The BA.3.2 variant has now spread to multiple countries, including to the United States; it was found in wastewater samples from 25 states: https://news.northeastern.edu/2026/03/27/new-covid-19-cicada-variant/, “What you should know about the new COVID-19 ‘Cicada’ Variant”, Tanner Stening, 27 March 2026. A screenshot from the Stening article is below:

And, as if dutifully, the “mainstream media” is running with the “it’s a new variant outbreak” aspect: https://www.newsweek.com/map-shows-new-covid-variant-ba-3-2-spread-across-us-11745474, Giulia Carbonaro, 27 March 2026. A screenshot of the “outbreak map” in the article, courtesy of the CDC, is below:

Per Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BA.3.2), the general summary list of SARS-CoV-2 virus variants:

Note where BA.3.2 is on this list. It is “descended” from a BA.3 Omicron variant (BA.1.1.529.3.) This places BA.3.2 (the “Cicada” variant that is the “new, latest variant”) closer up the list to the original Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) — hence, the “Cicada” nickname. Like the insect that hatches years after its eggs have been in the soil.

Note also the combination of both the BA.2 AND the BA.3 variants in BA.3.2. Both the BA.2 and the BA.3 variant lines are “heavily mutated.” And, in fact, the BA.3.2. “new, latest variant” has 70 to 75 mutations within it (per the Stening article, above.) In addition, per the CDC’s testing of samples of BA.3.2, this “new, latest variant” evades antibodies. The Scientific American article on BA.3.2, which mentions this, is here: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-cicada-covid-variant-is-spreading-in-the-u-s-heres-what-to-know/, Tanya Lewis, 30 March 2026. A screenshot from this article is below:

It appears that both the BA.3 and the BA.3.2 SARS-CoV-2 virus variants were first detected in South Africa (regarding the emergence of BA.3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SARS-CoV-2_Omicron_variant#BA.3.) Let’s examine this situation.

First: GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, https://www.gavi.org/, was founded in Davos, and is funded by the Gates Foundation, among other entities / persons.) In 2021, GAVI announced an “investment opportunity” regarding launching a COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” program in South Africa: https://https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room/united-states-host-launch-event-gavi-covax-amc-2021-investment-opportunity. A screenshot from this press release is below:

The United States Secretary of State in April 2021 was Antony Blinken. The USAID Administrator in April 2021 was Gloria Steele (Acting Administrator; Samantha Power was sworn in as the Administrator on 3 May 2021.)

GAVI, the Gates Foundation, and COVAX went right to work on getting South Africa COVID-19 “vaccinated.” Per the Wikipedia entry regarding this situation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_vaccination_in_South_Africa), the “vaccine” distribution pie chart, as of 2021:

The COVAX program in South Africa was ended on 31 December 2023: https://www.unicef.org/supply/covax-ensuring-global-equitable-access-covid-19-vaccines. COVAX was a coalition involving GAVI, WHO, and CEPI. CEPI (Coalition for Pandemic Preparedness Innovations, https://cepi.net/.) Among the funders of (investors in) CEPI are the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum (https://cepi.net/investors.) Below is a screenshot from the UNICEF article:

Does the reader see how the game is played? GAVI organizes an “investment opportunity” virtual meeting regarding funding for COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” programs in Africa, including in South Africa. The United States is heavily involved, via the Secretary of State and the USAID Administrator. Further involvement is orchestrated by GAVI to include UNICEF, CEPI, WHO, and (by extension) the WEF. Massive amounts of the COVID-19 modRNA bioweapon “vaccine” BNT162b2 are furnished by Pfizer-BioNTech for the “vaccination” program. Almost 80% of the eligible population in South Africa is “vaccinated” with BNT162b2, starting in early summer 2021. The BA.3 variant of SARS-CoV-2 emerges in South Africa, then it “doesn’t take off” and disappears — until it “re-emerges” (like the cicadas after years of dormancy) as BA.3.2 in November 2024 — in South Africa, from whence it is now detected in at least 23 countries, including in the United States. The CDC begins to “raise alarm” over this situation, especially since BA.3.2 has an “uncanny ability” to evade the antibodies supposedly “created” via the current COVID-19 modRNA bioweapon “vaccines”, or via prior COVID-19 infection and recovery.

Do not forget that the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” do the following: One, to “trick” the “vaccinated” person’s body into thinking it is infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus; which then forces the body to produce large amounts of immune system cells to “fight off” the “fake infection”, and which “vaccines” are at work in the body for at least 700 days post-injection (per the Yale LISTEN study); and, Two, to destroy the crucial RNA of the body’s natural Uridine, which under normal circumstances, would “alert” the body that there is an “enemy” (infection.) The RNA destruction is done by the N1-Methylpseudouridine in these “vaccines.” One of the principal scientific researchers who worked on One and Two above is Dr. Drew Weissman. Please see: https://www.brandeis.edu/now/2020/september/weissman-vaccine-mrna.html, Lawrence Goodman, 29 September 2020; and, https://www.brandeis.edu/magazine/2024/winter/the-brief/weissman-nobel.html. Two screenshots from these articles are below: the first, from the 2020 article; the second, from the 2024 article. Dr. Weissman, along with Dr. Katalin Kariko, received the Nobel Prize for their work with mRNA “vaccine” development:

Which illuminates the “why” behind the emergence of the BA.3 and the BA.3.2 variants in South Africa after the COVID-19 “vaccination” programs began in 2021; which illuminates the “why” behind the emergence of all the other SARS-CoV-2 variants; which illuminates the “why” behind the “breakthrough infections” and the “becoming infected with COVID despite being vaccinated” incidences since the rollout of these “vaccines” in December 2020; which illuminates the “why” behind the steady damage to / destruction of, the immune system of the “vaccinated” body.

And where is the “new ACIP roster” which was stated was coming, after Federal Judge Brian E. Murphy disbanded the group and reinstated the former CDC Childhood Immunization Schedule in his “ruling” of 16 March 2025? NOWHERE. There IS NO “new ACIP members roster.” There IS NO announcement of a meeting scheduled by this group.

What does this mean regarding the concept of FOCUS?

It means: Focus on the truth that the CDC (and, by extension, HHS and the FDA) are now controlled by outside interests: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/03/27/health-friday-3-27-2026-open-thread-hhs-is-controlled-by-big-pharma-the-american-academy-of-pediatrics-and-the-federal-judiciary/.

It means: Focus on the truth that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is effectively negated in his ability to direct the department (and, by extension, the CDC and the FDA) — in other words, to do his job.

It means: Focus on the fact that it is “open season” on the people of the United States — from BEFORE birth and up until death — to be “vaccinated” with products that do NOT prevent disease; that do NOT prevent hospitalization from disease; that INDUCE a myriad of negative side effects, including death; that AGGRAVATE or RE-ESTABLISH pre-existing medical conditions that were under control / in remission, including cancer; to be injected with products that are NOT fully tested, the data NOT fully analyzed, and instead to be used as “human lab rats” for the Big Pharma companies that lab-develop / lab-create these products.

**** It means: Focus on the fact that people MUST do their own research — MUST do their own thinking — MUST make their OWN decisions, related to taking ANY “vaccine.” To allowing ANY “vaccine” to be put into their children. To question ANY healthcare provider who “recommends” ANY “vaccine.” To DEMAND to see the Package Insert for ANY “vaccine” that is “recommended” and to READ IT. To REFUSE ANY “vaccine” that raises ANY questions regarding “safety and efficacy” in the mind of the patient / parent(s) / guardian. To READ the reports in VAERS related to COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” serious adverse reactions / serious events. To stop blindly rolling up the sleeve for a “vaccine” injection because “Follow the science.”

THERE IS NO PLACE IN THE HUMAN BODY FOR AN mRNA, A modRNA, AN saRNA, OR A taRNA PRODUCT OF ANY KIND, IN ANY FORM.

THERE MUST BE, FIRST, MUCH MORE RESEARCH INTO THESE PLATFORMS, WITH COMPLETE AND PROPER TESTING, DATA ANALYSES, AND SAFETY AND EFFICACY REPORTING.

THERE MUST BE, SECOND, A TOTAL STOP TO ALL GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH IN THE UNITED STATES.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items available on the Internet in today’s offering, the ideas and opinions above are by PAVACA. Credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas and opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers, by podcasters, or in print or social media.)

Health Friday 3.27.2026 Open Thread: HHS is Controlled by Big Pharma, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Federal Judiciary

The vintage header image of “The Trial of the Lewis Deer Raiders at Edinburgh” for today’s offering is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering discusses the recent court ruling by Federal Judge Brian E. Murphy, which as effectively gelded the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) division of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS.)

On 16 March 2026, Federal Judge Brian E. Murphy, of Boston, ruled for the plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the CDC, the ACIP group of the CDC (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices), HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, and other defendants. The lawsuit was brought by a coalition of health organizations, headed by the AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics.) The Murphy ruling, among other items, enjoined the ACIP group from undertaking its scheduled meeting in March, 2026; it stayed any proposed changes to the CDC Childhood Immunization Schedule, changes that were to have been approved at this meeting; and, nullified all recommendations, directives, and other actions, made by the ACIP group since July 2025. Fierce Pharma covered the ruling here: https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/judge-pumps-brakes-rfk-jr-vaccine-overhaul-targering-acip-and-cdc-schedule-revamp, Eric Sagonowsky and Fraiser Kansteiner, 16 March 2026.

The ruling by Judge Murphy is here: https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/gdpzawegkvw/03162026vaccine.pdf. The list of plaintiffs, and more coverage of the Murphy ruling, are here: https://www.apha.org/news-and-media/news-releases/apha-news-releases/federal-judge-blocks-immunization-schedule-changes, “Federal Judge Blocks Immunization Schedule Changes, Stays ACIP Member Appointments”, 16 March 2026. Please see the screenshot, below, from this article:

Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, discussed the ruling here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/more-on-the-judgy-mcjudgefaceacip-situation, “More on Judge Brian E Murphy/ACIP situation”, 21 March 2026. Please see the screenshots, below, from this article:

Yours Truly went to the article (referred to in the post by Dr. Rose), written by an experienced practicing attorney, regarding the Murphy “ruling.” The attorney is Bobbie Anne Flower Cox, Esq. Her article is here: https://brownstone.org/articles/when-judges-go-rogue/, 23 March 2026. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

But wait, there’s more! Judge Murphy, in his “ruling”, also “critiqued” each (then)-member of the ACIP group, finding every one of them “lacking” in what he deemed to be the “amount of expertise” to be making any decisions regarding the CDC vaccination schedule. Please see the screenshots from his “ruling”, below: Page 29 and Page 30:

And then, with even more breathtaking condescension, the following, from Page 31 of the Murphy “ruling”:

It appears that the (then)-members of the ACIP group were supposed to “present evidence” to him that they ARE qualified to sit on the committee? And, if the JUDGE deems their “level of expertise” is “lacking”, that the JUDGE can dismiss such members from the committee? Were the credentials of, for example, (then)-ACIP member Dr. Robert Malone not “good enough” for Judge Murphy? — After all, Dr. Malone discovered how mRNA can be “packaged” into a lipid nanoparticle. And why does it appear that Judge Murphy has a “particular axe to grind” regarding (then)-ACIP member Dr. Retsef Levi?

Back to the Bobbie Anne Cox article. It appears the Judge Murphy was doing all he could to find ways to “legislate from the bench.” Please see below, from Ms. Cox’s article:

Regarding the last point, about the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) having no standing: Guess what? The AAP gets large donations from Big Pharma entities, such as, Pfizer, Moderna, and, Seqirus. The AAP is completely compromised and should never have been a party to this (bogus) lawsuit in the first place. Please see: https://www.aap.org/en/ways-to-give/current-corporate-and-organizational-supporters/, from 10 October 2025:

The AAP is a direct beneficiary of Big Pharma. AAP pediatrician members make significant amounts of income from “vaccinating” children with products manufactured by the Big Pharma entities that give large amounts of money to the AAP. See how the cycle works?

If, as Attorney Cox states, the Murphy “ruling” can be overturned in court, why did HHS apparently choose NOT to fight the “ruling”, opting instead to “reconstitute” the ACIP group? Please see: https://imahealth.substack.com/cp/191534018, “Breaking News: Chairman Milhoan Confirms that ACIP Disbanded in Response to Federal Court Ruling: Sources Indicate Administration Opts to Reconstitute ACIP Rather Than Appeal”, 16 March 2026. A screenshot from this article is below:

In addition, pediatricians receive “financial incentives” from Big Pharma companies and from insurance companies via programs to ensure that children are “vaccinated.” This, despite the denials and “fact-checking” by media and by organizations such as the AAP about such “incentive payments.” In fact, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has initiated an investigation into these payments given to pediatricians in his state. Please see: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-launches-wide-sweeping-investigation-unlawful-financial-incentives, “Attorney General Ken Paxton Launches Wide-Sweeping Investigation into Unlawful Financial Incentives Related to Childhood Vaccine Recommendations”, 21 January 2026. Please see the screenshot, below, from this article:

There is yet another aspect to the Murphy “ruling” situation: A combination of conflicting statements, apparent miscommunications, and what appears to be personnel from the Oval Office “taking a more active role” in HHS activities. Please see: https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/acip-members-miscommunication-vaccine-panels-future-adds-confusion-after-earlier-upset-court, “ACIP member’s miscommunication on vaccine panel’s future adds to confusion about ruling”, 20 March 2026, Fraiser Kansteiner. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

Note that Yours Truly used the phrase, “appears to be personnel from the Oval Office” related to the HHS situation — the Wall Street Journal cites “unnamed sources.” However, what can be said, with a fair amount of accuracy, is that the HHS (and its CDC and FDA and NIH and NIAID divisions) have been roiling due to the attempts of HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., to curtail / stop, the “good old days” in the department. The “good old days” when drugs and “vaccines” were granted EUAs or Full Approval without proper full testing and data analysis; when the CDC “recommended” more and more “vaccines” for children from birth to age 18; when the FDA granted EUAs and Full Approvals for drugs and biologics that were clearly dangerous to patients (VIOXX [pain reliever]; and, Aduhelm [Alzheimer’s disease drug] are cases in point.) What can be said, with a fair amount of accuracy, is that Gain-of-Function experiments in the United States are still being funded by NIH, even though a “ban” on such experiments and funding was declared in 2025 — and, in addition, such experiments are also being conducted by other agencies within the federal government; as, for example, the H5N1 Avian Influenza experiments being conducted at the USDA Southeast Poultry Division facility in Georgia (https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/trump-admin-keeps-ties-to-who-influenza, “Trump Admin Keeps Ties to WHO Influenza System as U.S. Funds Bird Flu Gain-of-Function and Mass Vaccine Programs”, 24 January 2026.)

The following are the opinions of Yours Truly:

What the situation is today: Big Pharma, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Federal Judiciary, are in control of the Department of Health and Human Services. What the situation is today: HHS has opted to “reconstitute” the ACIP group, instead of fighting the Murphy “ruling” in court — in effect, acquiescing to the “ruling.” This acquiescing “kicks the door off the hinges” for any Federal Judge to stop / stay / delay, any directive, recommendation, committee, or activity of that committee, of the HHS, CDC, or FDA.

What the situation is today: Millions of children, from birth to age 18, are at risk for complications of all kinds induced by the multitude of “vaccines” that they are “recommended” to get according to the old CDC Childhood Immunizations Schedules.

What the situation is today: By HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., focusing on creating a new “food pyramid chart”, along with other “side-bar” programs — which, of themselves, are worthy — but not as important as focusing on completely rooting out any influence of Big Pharma and Establishment Medicine at HHS, he has allowed these entities to manipulate the Federal Judiciary into neutering the entire agency. By HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., focusing on other programs, he is NOT doing anything substantive regarding completely STOPPING the use of COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States — arguably, the most dangerous, deadly, and poisonous products ever designed. By HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., focusing on other programs, he is NOT doing anything substantive regarding bringing those to account for their roles in creating the COVID-19 virus itself, or the COVID-19 “vaccines.”

What the situation is today: Is is more important then ever for all persons (including parents of children from birth up to age 18) to take charge of their health. To question the “why” behind a “recommendation” by a healthcare professional regarding taking any “vaccine”, let alone any drug. To refuse to take any “vaccine”, or to have any “vaccine” put into their children, that the patient (or patient’s parents) do not approve. To fight to have “vaccine liberty” from school boards, employers, and insurance companies that request “compliance” with “recommendations” or “mandates” for “vaccination.”

What the situation is today: Since Big Pharma, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Federal Judiciary are now in control of the Department of Health and Human Services — it is now the responsibility of HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., to stop this situation; or, for the current Administration to find someone who will.

What the situation is today: An example of the new “power base” that is in control of HHS / CDC / FDA: Pfizer-BioNTech wants the FDA to approve the company’s new Lyme disease “vaccine” (which appears to be mRNA-based) that it is developing with a French company, Valneva. The “vaccine candidate” is called VLA15. This, despite the fact that the Phase 3 clinical trial for VLA15 did NOT meet its primary outcome goal — which goal was to demonstrate effectiveness. This, despite the fact that the CDC has NOT YET “reconstituted” the ACIP group, which group is SUPPOSED TO RECOMMEND new “vaccines” for authorization or for approval by the FDA. If the FDA does not bow to Pfizer-BioNTech’s request to approve VLA15, what is to stop the company from suing the FDA and, via a Federal Judge (for example, Judge Brian E. Murphy), forcing the agency to approve the “vaccine?” Please see: https://tdefender.substack.com/cp/1921132650, “Pfizer Wants FDA to Approve Its Vaccine for Lyme Disease — But Does It Have a Shot?”, Brenda Baletti, PhD, 25 March 2026.

THERE IS NO PLACE IN THE HUMAN BODY FOR AN mRNA, A modRNA, AN saRNA, OR A taRNA PRODUCT OF ANY KIND, IN ANY FORM.

THERE MUST, FIRST, BE MUCH MORE RESEARCH PERFORMED ON THESE TECHNOLOGIES AND PLATFORMS.

THERE MUST BE, SECOND, EXTENSIVE TESTING OF PRODUCTS USING THESE TECHNOLOGIES AND PLATFORMS, WITH COMPLETE ANALYSES OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY DATA.

ALL GAIN-OF-FUNCTION EXPERIMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, OF ANY KIND, PERFORMED BY ANY DEPARTMENT OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, MUST BE STOPPED.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Disclaimer and Notice: Except for linked URLs and other items available on the Internet, the ideas and opinions of today’s offering are by PAVACA. Credit to PAVACA must be given if the ideas and opinions of today’s offering are used by other blog writers, by podcasters, in social or in print media.)

Health Friday 2.27.2026 Open Thread: Moderna’s mRNA-1010 and the End Run Around HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr.: Part One

The header image for today’s offering of an end run is courtesy of Grammarist and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information regarding Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated items; to the best of her knowledge and belief, there are none. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is Part One regarding the current situation with Moderna’s latest entry into the mRNA-based “vaccine” platform: the company’s influenza “vaccine”, mRNA-1010.

On 11 February 2026, Dr. Vinay Prasad, director the CBER division of the FDA (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research) sent an RTF letter (Refusal to File letter) to Moderna in response to that company’s BLA application (BIologics License Application) review request for mRNA-1010, a modRNA-based “vaccine” against several strains of influenza. Dr. Prasad cited the lack of a true placebo control group in a study by Moderna using this “vaccine candidate.” Please see the screenshots, below, from https://pharmacally.com/fda-issues-refusal-to-file-letter-for-modernas-mrna-1010-flu-vaccine/, 11 February 2026:

However, by a few days later, the situation had changed completely: the FDA “reversed course”, agreeing to review Moderna’s BLA (amended) application for mRNA-1010.

By 18 February 2026, a “Type A” meeting had been arranged between the FDA and Moderna regarding the RTF letter. Moderna agreed to submit an “amended” BLA application to the FDA for mRNA-1010. The FDA accepted the amended BLA application. The FDA will make a final decision on approving mRNA-1010 by 5 August 2026. Please see the screenshot, below, from https://www.biospace.com/fda/fda-reverses-course-on-modernas-mrna-flu-shot-application-promising-august-decision, Heather McKenzie, 18 February 2026:

Note: A Type A meeting at the FDA is a “high-priority” meeting; sometimes, Type A meetings are called “milestone meetings.” Per https://facetlifesciences.com/ and https://seed.nih.gov/ searches.

Please see the screenshots, below, on this “volte-face” from https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-reverses-course-will-now-review, “FDA Reverses Course, Will Now Review Moderna’s Controversial mRNA Flu Vaccine”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, 20 February 2026:

Then, from https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/fda-reverses-course-review-moderna-approval-application-influenza-812432/, “FDA reverses course on Moderna’s flu vaccine”, Delilah Alvardo, 19 February 2026 (the quotation in the screenshot is from Mani Foroohar):

Note that last sentence, by Mr. Faroohar. It clarifies three “behind-the-scenes” aspects of mRNA-1010:

**** One: That Moderna will do whatever it takes to get mRNA-1010 approved — including being “more assertive” with the FDA, and arranging it so that the FDA will “work with” Moderna.

**** Two: That Moderna will do a “post-marketing study” on mRNA-1010 AFTER it is FDA-approved — meaning that ANYONE who takes mRNA-1010 AFTER the FDA approves it is being treated as a “human lab rat” by Moderna. This is the same type of situation that occurred when the FDA approved Moderna’s modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine”, mRNA-1273.

**** Three: That Moderna considers the FDA approval of mRNA-1010 as the “stepping-stone” to what the company appears to believe is the “Holy Grail” of modRNA-based “vaccines” — the company’s “combo” modRNA-based influenza + modRNA-based COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1083 (the clinical trials for which have been completed)

There are, in addition, two other aspects to the situation: What appears to be pressure on Dr. Martin Makary, MD (FDA Commissioner) to “knuckle under” to what Moderna wants; and, what appears to be a coordinated campaign to have Dr. Vinay Prasad removed from his position as CBER division director at the FDA. In Yours Truly’s opinion, these relate to the “sudden arrangement” of the FDA “Type A” meeting between Moderna representatives and the FDA almost immediately after the Refusal to File was issued by Dr. Prasad. Please see the screenshots, below, from https://www.biospace.com/fda/makary-prasad-under-fire-as-fda-turmoil-reaches-president-trump, Heather McKenzie, 20 February 2026:

Peter Pitts, by the way, was an FDA employee whose position was that of a “senior communications and policy adviser” of the agency (https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/authos/peter-pitts.) It appears that Mr. Pitts and CMPI are involved in a campaign to have Dr. Prasad removed from the FDA.

In Yours Truly’s opinion: Dr. Martin Makary is compromised, due to his involvement with BIO.org/, the group that is implementing a campaign to have HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., removed; and, Dr. Prasad is compromised, due to what appears to be lack of support within FDA, combined with innuendoes regarding his professional behavior at the agency.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, It appears that there is a combination of chaos, mistrust, internecine feuding, and active resistance going on within the FDA; plus, exterior pressure on the agency from companies and other entities to restore the FDA back to the “good old days”, when drugs and other biologics were authorized and approved in what may be called a kind of “rubber-stamp” process. It also appears that HHS Sec. Kennedy, Jr., is either being “kept out of the loop” regarding what is going on with the FDA; or, cannot, for whatever reason, root out personnel within the FDA who are fomenting trouble.

Yours Truly now turns to the Moderna-funded published paper on mRNA-1010, which was cited by Dr. Prasad as the reason for his issuing the Refusal to File letter to the company: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-025-01340-5. “mRNA-1010 influenza vaccine elicits distinct and enhanced humoral immunity compared to adjuvanted inactivated vaccines.” Paulina Kaplonek, et al. 15 December 2025. Moderna completely funded this study; all of the paper’s co-authors are either current or former Moderna employees; and, the current Moderna employees who are co-authors of the paper are also stockholders in the company. All of these in and of themselves, in Yours Truly’s opinion, represent massive conflicts of interest that should, under normal circumstances, disqualify the paper from any serious consideration by the FDA for a BLA application review. This is aside from the flaws in the clinical trial NCT05397223, on which the paper was based (more on this below in today’s offering.) Please see the screenshots from this paper, below:

Note the use of the word, “may.” This word is used in several areas of the paper, as in, “may elicit”; “may reflect”; and, “may induce.” In other words, Moderna does not KNOW if mRNA-1010 can actually be helpful against influenza. The company is guessing that it “may.” However, the company is still pursuing the BLA application with the FDA to get the “vaccine” approved — without having provided ANY proof that the “vaccine” actually does what it is “supposed” to do — which is, to prevent influenza infection better than the licensed influenza “vaccines” already on the market.

The following screenshots from the paper relate to how mRNA-1010 works, including: Figure 4B and Figure 4D, which show that the “vaccine” minimizes the crucial natural body’s activity of IgM cells (the “recognize an enemy and signal the other cells” immune cells); which show that there is an apparent increase of IgG4 cells (the “tolerate but never clear” cells); and, which appear to hint at mRNA-1010 being used as a kind of “universal influenza vaccine” candidate:

The blue image is the results of the “comparator influenza vaccine”, FLUAD; the red image is the results of mRNA-1010.

Then, from the section that discusses the results of Figure 4B and Figure 4D:

The Moderna paper co-authors did not prove that mRNA-1010 provides mucosal protection from influenza.

Following is a screenshot from the paper regarding the non-involvement of IgM cells induced by mRNA-1010:

Followed by the “hint” that mRNA-1010 may be used as a “universal influenza vaccine” candidate:

Finally, the Acknowledgements section, and the Ethics Declarations section, of the paper:

As shareholders in Moderna, the above employees (and co-authors of the paper on mRNA-1010) stand to make money off the sale and use of this “vaccine.”

**** Regarding the clinical trial which was the foundation for the Moderna paper that was published on 15 December 2025, NCT05397223, details of which are found here: https://clinicaltrials.org/study/NCT05397223. This clinical trial did NOT have a true saline placebo Control Group. Per the Clinical Trials website, there are TWO separate parts to the study. In Part One, study subjects received injections of: of mRNA-1345 (a modRNA-based “vaccine” against RSV); or, of mRNA-1647 (a modRNA-based “vaccine” against Cytomegalovirus);, or, of mRNA-1273 (the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”), all by Moderna. In Part Two, study subjects received injections of either: FLUAD (the “comparator” licensed inactivated influenza vaccine by Seqirus); or, of mRNA-1010. Please see the screenshot, below, from the Clinical Trials website for NCT05397223, the Secondary Outcomes Measures section:

However, there is not a single word in the Moderna-funded paper cited above in which the outcomes for ANY of the “vaccines” used on the study subjects other than FLUAD or mRNA-1010, are found. Nothing for mRNA-1345, for mRNA-1647, or for mRNA-1273. It is unknown if any of these three “vaccines” induced any interactions with either FLUAD or with mRNA-1010. There are “No Results Posted” on the Clinical Trials website for NCT05397223.

Moderna has been in the process of developing and testing mRNA-1010 for the past several years. The company applied pressure, which apparently went all the way up to the Oval Office, in order to force the FDA to reverse course and agree to review the (amended) BLA application for mRNA-1010, despite the flaws of the clinical trial NCT053972723, and despite the Refusal to File letter sent by Dr. Vinay Prasad.

To be continued in Part Two.

THERE IS NO PLACE IN THE HUMAN BODY FOR AN mRNA-BASED, modRNA-BASED, saRNA-BASED, OR taRNA-BASED PRODUCT IN ANY FORM.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: With the exception of linked items that are found on the internet, the ideas and opinions of today’s offering are by PAVACA. Credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in social or print media.)

Health Friday 2.20.2026 Open Thread: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 modRNA “Vaccine” Negative Effects Proven Ongoing Over Three Years Post-Injection: Part Three

The header image of 1955 vintage Pfizer penicillin bottles is courtesy of Pond5 and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information on Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the negative effects and outcomes of the modRNA COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered, and/or continue to suffer, injuries, illnesses, or disabilities induced by these “vaccines” that they took; and, to those who have passed away from the negative effects and outcomes induced by these “vaccines” that they took.

There are Important Notifications by our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: If there is AI-generated content in today’s offering, it will be labeled as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is Part Three of three. The previous two parts of this series are here: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/02/06/health-friday-2-6-2026-open-thread-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-modrna-vaccine-negative-effects-proven-ongoing-over-three-years-post-injection-part-one/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2026/02/13/health-friday-2-13-2026-open-thread-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-modrna-vaccine-negative-effects-proven-ongoing-over-three-years-post-injection-part-two/.

The Hulscher, McCullough, et al., paper that is the basis for this series is here: https://zenodo.org/records/18460099. “Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination.” Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, et al. 2 February 2026.

Today’s offering will discuss the findings of ongoing heart / cardiovascular damage induced by the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 modRNA “vaccine”, BNT162b2, in the patient described in the above-cited paper. Below, from the paper, are screenshots of sections that discuss the heart and cardiovascular damage that was found in the patient well after he took this “vaccine”:

The results of the patient’s home-administered cardiac readout tests:

As can be seen, the evidence of irregular heart rhythm are unmistakable. However, refer to the text above — the symptoms were apparently dismissed as “unlikely” for myocarditis / pericarditis, even though Emergency Room visit records when the patient presented there appear to show otherwise.

Continuing, from the paper:

Finally, a cardiac MRI was performed, which confirmed symptoms “consistent with COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis…”; see below, a reduced image from the paper:

The following are several scientific papers and articles. The first one is the 1992 paper by Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, of the results of his experiments to induce myocarditis and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) in rabbits that he injected with a rabbit coronavirus (https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/165/1/134/986090. “An Experimental Model for Myocarditis and Congestive Heart Failure after Rabbit Coronavirus Infection.” Ralph S. Baric, et al. January 1992.) Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. First, the general summary:

Followed by two portions from the Discussion section. “RbCV” = rabbit coronavirus.

Following is a look at Reference paper number 17, cited several times in the Baric, et al., paper above. Reference paper number 17 is found here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2042305/. “Rabbit cardiomyopathy associated with a virus antigenetically related to human coronavirus strain 229E.” Small, JD, Aurelian, L., Squire, R.A., et al. June 1979. The following screenshots are from this paper. First, the general summary:

Then, from the Discussion section:

Note the mention of human coronavirus 229E and its potential for “cross-reactivity” with other coronaviruses, including gastroenteritis in swine. Recall that Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, invented the “No See-m’s” method for “seamless assembly” of chimeric (lab-created) virus code pieces using the TGEV virus (swine transmissible gastroenteritis virus) model back in 2000 (https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.74.22.10600-10611.2000. “A strategy for the assembly of large RNA and DNA genomes: the transmissible gastroenteritis virus model.” Ralph Baric, et al. 2000.)

Dr. Joseph Sansone, PhD, a psychotherapist in Florida, speaks to the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines” causing heart disease, immune system conditions, and more, here: https://usawatchdog.com/world-ignoring-disaster-of-cv19-bioweapon-vax-dr-joe-sansone/, 8 February 2026. Dr. Sansone links to the Hulscher, McCullough, et al., article cited above in today’s offering. Please see the screenshot below, from this article:

There is an earlier article discussing heart damage — at the mitochondrial level — that is induced by the COVID-19 “vaccines”, at The Focal Points, here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/spike-protein-exhausts-cardiomyocyte, “Spike Protein Exhausts Cardiomyocyte Mitochondria”, 8 September 2024. The paper referred to in this article is here: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12060877. “Spike Protein Impairs Mitochondrial Function in Human Cardiomyocytes: Mechanisms Underlying Cardiac Injury in COVID-19.” Tin Van Huynh, et al. 11 March 2023.

Yours Truly believes that the Hulscher, McCullough, et al., February 2026 paper cited in today’s offering is of incalculable importance. This paper proves that these negative effects and outcomes in “vaccinated” persons can be found more than three years post-“vaccine” injection. This paper proves that an individual “vaccinated” person can present with numerous negative effects and outcomes induced by these “vaccines.” Yours Truly expresses deep appreciation of Dr. McCullough and his colleagues in working with this patient in the long and laborious testing that had to be performed in order to come to the correct diagnoses for the patient; and, from there, coming up with a treatment plan.

The Hulscher, McCullough, et al., February 2026 paper proves that there is risk of multiple types of negative effects and outcomes from having this “vaccine” in the body — damage that can be found years after the “vaccine” is injected into the body, and that can extend to the brain. This risk pool includes those who take the “latest version COMIRNATY COVID-19 vaccine”.

Yours Truly will make it clear that the patient in the Hulscher, McCullough, et al., February 2026 paper took three injections of BNT162b2: two in March 2021 (3 March and 24 March); and, the “booster” injection on 20 February 2022 — then did not take any further injections. The damage to his body and the accompanying associated emotional/psychological effects on him were traced back to these three injections over 3.5 years later. What about the millions upon millions of persons who took the BNT162b2 “primary series” of two injections back in 2021, then the original BNT162b2 “booster” injection in 2022, and then have taken injections of the BNT162b2 “descendant clone COVID-19 vaccines” (under the brand name, COMIRNATY), since the year 2022? What about the persons who have taken six injections so far of this Pfizer-BioNTech injectable — the “primary series” of two injections in 2021 + the “original booster injection” in 2022 + the 2023 “COMIRNATY booster” + the 2024 “COMIRNATY booster” + the 2025 “COMIRNATY booster”? If one person who took only three of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” injectables (the patient in the Hulscher, McCullough, et al., paper) and presents with multiple negative effects and outcomes over 3.5 years after stopping taking the injections — what about the millions of persons who have a total of at least six Pfizer-BioNTech (COMIRNATY) injections in their bodies as of now? If the potential for multiple negative effects and outcomes from the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 injectables can be found in a “vaccinated” person over three years post-final injection, what is the potential for “rolling accumulated negative effects and outcomes” from these injectables in a person who has taken these injections every year since early 2021?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The following is not medical advice. They are opinions:

Any person who has ever taken a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection — even if only one injection — of any type (modRNA, DNA viral vector, “protein subunit”, etc.) may be at risk for developing negative effects and/or outcomes induced by these “vaccines.” COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons may wish to consider having the following tests performed:

A lung scan, to investigate whether or not there are issues that can have been induced from these “vaccines”; such as, compromised alveoli or lung tissue inflammation.

A heart / cardiac scan, to investigate whether or not there are issues that can have been induced by these “vaccines”; such as, scarring of heart tissue or symptoms of preclinical myocarditis.

A D-dimer test performed, to investigate whether or not there are elevated levels of microclots in the blood, which can have been induced by these “vaccines.”

An IgG3 panel test and an IgG4 panel test performed, to investigate whether or not there are reduced levels of IgG3 cells (the “fight the enemy cells off” immune system cells), and/or elevated levels of IgG4 cells (the “tolerate but don’t fight off” immune system cells), both of which can have been induced by these “vaccines.”

Note: The above tests usually need to be ordered by a physician; or, by another licensed healthcare professional who is approved to order these types of tests.

Interested persons may wish to consider following a post-“vaccination” recovery treatment protocol, such as the one outlined here, from the Independent Medical Alliance: https://imahealth.org/protocol/i-recover-post-vaccine-treatment.

For those who are not COVID-19 “vaccinated”, there is the now-proven phenomenon of “vaccine shedding” from “vaccinated” persons onto other persons, including onto non-“vaccinated” persons. Please see: https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/newly-published-study-shows-shedding, “Newly Published Study Shows Shedding Of Covid mRNA Vaccine Products”, 9 December 2024.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE IN THE UNITED STATES. NOW.

THERE MUST BE ACCOUNTABILITY, JUSTICE, AND TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: The ideas and opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA. Credit must be given to PAVACA if ideas or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers, by podcasters, or in social or print media.)