Health Friday 10.17.2025 Open Thread: LINE-1, Chromosomes, and the modRNA COVID-19 “Vaccines”: Part Two

The free vintage header image for today’s offering of human chromosomes as drawn by hand is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. Today’s offering is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered injuries, illnesses, or disabilities resulting from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from having been injected with the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, to those who have died from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had taken.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. These are linked here. Note 1: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except possibly for some items embedded in linked URLS. If readers wish to add AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Note 2: Starting with today’s offering, there will be an “Intellectual Property” notice at the end of the post. This is because Yours Truly has noticed that another blog has apparently modified and used certain information in a Health Friday post on their own blog without giving credit to Yours Truly. Thank you.

Yours Truly posted Part One of the LINE-1 and Chromosome 19 situation regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/09/25/health-friday-9-5-2025-open-thread-human-line-1-chromosomes-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-part-one/. Part One discussed the (permanent) alteration to the LINE-1 human cell line that was designed into the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” Part Two will discuss the alteration to the human Chromosome 19 (along with alteration to other human chromosomes) that were ALSO designed into the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” To begin Part Two, here is a “refresher” on the paper that was published by Ralph Baric, PhD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, on “Synthetic Genomics.” This paper has multiple graphics that display his “templates” for lab-creating synthetic viruses that are “programmed” to alter the DNA, the cells, and the chromosomes of humans: https://www.jcvi.org/sites/default/files/assets/projects/synthetic-genomics-options-for-governance/Baric-Synthetic-Viral-Genomics.pdf, “Synthetic Viral Genomics: Risks and Benefits for Science and Society”, Ralph S. Baric, PhD, 2006. Screenshots of a few of the graphics in this paper are below:

Note the phrase, “…reverse genetics and directed evolution.” Keep this phrase in mind for later in today’s offering.

And now, Yours Truly presents Part Two, beginning with human Chromosome 19, one of the 23 pairs of chromosomes that make up the human chromosome “map.” Below is an image of human Chromosome 19, per Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome_19.) One of the two parts of the chromosome pair is from the father; the other is from the mother:

What does human Chromosome 19 do? The following if from https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/chromosome/19: first, a general Description of human Chromosome 19:

Then, a description of a set of conditions called 19p13.13 Deletion Syndrome:

A short discussion of other types of conditions related to human Chromosome 19 issues:

And, human Chromosome 19 in relation to Cancers:

Below is a screenshot of the Chromosome 19 Disease Map that was published in 1997 (https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/gte.1997.1.145, “Disease genes and chromosomes: disease maps of the human genome. Chromosome 19”, by F Gilbert):

There has been more research since 1997 into human Chromosome 19 and its relationship to diseases and health conditions. An example is here: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91924-7, “Mutant p53 and chromosome 19 microRNA cluster overexpression regulate cancer testis antigen expression and cellular transformation in hepatocellular carcinoma”, Goodwin G. Jinesh, et al., 16 June 2021. Two screenshots from the Introduction of this paper are below:

Take a look again at the 1997 graphic above, and note the areas of human Chromosome 19q.13, q.13.2, q13.32, and q13.34 on the Disease Map that influence the body. An interesting paper from 2018 regarding human Chromosome 19 and what occurs when there is dysregulation is here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6112826/, “Cancer and the junkyard chromosome: how repeat DNA sequence on chromosome 19 influences risk of malignant disease”, Anne M. Rose, 10 August 2018. Two screenshots from this paper are below. The point here is that human Chromosome 19 is a “rich and fertile ground” for those who wish to experiment with how to alter certain areas of the chromosome, such as the p area or the q area; both of these chromosome 19 areas influence multiple organs and functions of the human body:

Yours Truly has written about the deleterious effects that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” have on the immensely important p53 protein of the human body: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/01/10/health-friday-open-thread-1-10-2025/p53-sv40-the-covid-19-vaccines-and-cancer-with-a-note-on-the-virus-itself/; and, https://www.thetree.com/2025/02/28/health-friday-2-28-2025-open-thread-more-on-p53-the-guardian-of-the-genome-and-tumor-suppressor/. Lab-created aberrations and/or inclusions and/or alterations to the p53 protein, the “Guardian of the Genome”, impacts the influence of human Chromosome 19; and are particularly injurious to the entire body.

**** It appears, then, that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” interact with both the p53 protein AND human chromosome 19 to induce cancers in “vaccinated” persons; and, that the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code piece that is ALSO in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” is also involved regarding the inducement of cancer in “vaccinated” persons.

Which brings Yours Truly to this, a paper proving the first DIRECT evidence of human Chromosome 19 being altered by the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, which then induce Stage IV bladder cancer: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-first-direct-evidence, “BREAKING STUDY: First Direct Evidence of mRNA “Vaccine” Genomic Integration Identified in Stage IV Cancer Patient”, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 15 September 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

Note regarding the above: the sequences identified which induced the Stage IV bladder cancer in the patient were contained within the Spike protein (S protein) of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” that she took, not from within the Nucleocapsid protein (N protein.)

The young woman in question took THREE injections of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (mRNA-1273) during 2021 (the “primary series” plus one “booster shot.”) She was diagnosed with Stage IV bladder cancer within twelve months.

The paper is on the preprint server, Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/17122912, “Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggressive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination”, John A. Catanzano, Nicolas Hulscher, Peter A. McCullough, 15 September 2025. Please see the following screenshots from this paper; first, Table 1. from the Case Presentation. Table 1. outlines the exact “drivers” and “pathways” that established the bladder cancer in the previously-healthy 31-year-old patient after she took the three Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” injections:

Second, from the Case Presentation in the paper. Please note the mention that numerous human Chromosome 19 alterations induced by the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” EXACTLY MATCH the same Open Reading Frame (ORF) sequences in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (BNT162b2):

Which means that the alterations to human Chromosome 19 in BOTH the Moderna AND the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” occur within the Open Reading Frame of the spike protein (S protein.) This chromosome altering capability is thus then present in all “descendant modRNA COVID-19 vaccines” from these companies, including the “2025-2026 version” of Pfizer-BioNTech (COMIRNATY) and of Moderna (SPIKEVAX), since said “descendant COVID-19 vaccines” all employ the S protein from the original COMIRNATY or SPIKEVAX injectables.

From the Discussion section of the paper. Please read the screenshot below carefully. This is a description of how the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce TURBO-CANCER:

**** What we have here is proof that the oncogenic driver known as human Chromosome 3q26.32, Gene PIK3CA — was included in the modRNA of the Moderna COVID-19 “vaccine” mRNA-1273. Please see the Catanzano, et al., paper cited above: the Table 1., and the Discussion screenshots; and, also, the OMIM Phenotype – Gene Relationships table cited further down in today’s offering (though the OMIM table refers to colorectal cancer, PIK3CA is a driver for other cancers, also.

**** However, there is another element in play here: the Wuhan Hu1 virus itself (aka the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself / the COVID-19 virus itself) ALSO targets and attacks human Chromosomes: in particular, Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21. Please see this paper from December 2020, regarding a study performed on patients in the UK who were sick from the COVID-19 virus itself: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03065-y, “Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in COVID-19”, Erola Pairo-Castineira, et al., 11 December 2020. Two screenshots from this paper are below; first, from the general introduction:

Compare the references to human Chromosome 19p13.2 and human Chromosome 19p13.3 in the Liebert Chromosome 19 Disease Map graphic above in today’s offering. This is proof that those who lab-created the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself , and those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, did experiment with human Chromosome 19 in order to include aberrations to areas of this chromosome that could result in negative health outcomes BOTH for persons infected with the virus itself, and for persons who took the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”

And, Table 1 from the above paper:

Note: 11 December 2020 was the date of the initial Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” BNT162b2 to be used in the United States. Given that it takes months for a scientific paper to be researched, written, and published, one can assume that the Pairo-Castineira, et al., paper, was begun several months before the 11 December 2020 publish date. Note: There are FOUR identified areas on human Chromosome 6 that are attacked by the COVID-19 virus itself.

This paper, from 2014, describes the multiple health conditions and diseases that are associated with alterations to / deletions involving, human Chromosome 6: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2013.08.001, “The Human Proteome Organization Chromosome 6 Consortium: Integrating Chromosome-centric and biology/disease driven strategies”, P.A. Keown, et al., 4 April 2014. Please see the screenshot, below, from the Introduction of this paper:

From https://www.storymd.com/, the “Ideogram of human chromosome 6“, which lists the multiple health conditions and diseases associated with aberrations of / alterations to / deletions of, parts of human Chromosome 6. The ideogram is courtesy of the Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory:

Yours Truly firmly believes that, since human Chromosome 6 is also attacked by the SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) virus itself; and, since the COVID-19 virus itself is the foundational element within all of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — that these “vaccines”, once injected into the body, can and will attack the human Chromosome 6 of the “vaccinated” person’s body, along with attacking human Chromosomes 3, 12, 19, and 21.

Yours Truly firmly believes that those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself, and the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, experimented with human Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21, in order to introduce aberrations / mechanisms into them that could induce or aggravate health conditions and/or diseases that would not otherwise appear in healthy persons, then included the results of these experiments in both the virus itself, and in the modRNA “vaccines.

Yours Truly firmly believes that those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” then added the dangerous lipid nanoparticles (ALC-0159, ALC-0315, SM-102), and N1-Methylpseudouridine, to these “vaccines” to evade the human body’s immune system, to damage / destroy the human body’s immune system, and to damage / destroy the human body’s ability to detect and eliminate “enemy elements”, in order to force the “vaccinated” body to be defenseless to the negative effects of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” Thus, there are reports of, for example, Diabetes Mellitus resulting from modRNA COVID-19 “vaccination” by the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine”, BNT162b2, in this document: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section.

FLASH! Yours Truly has just found more proof, in her opinion, regarding the experiments on human Chromosomes by those who lab-created the COVID-19 virus itself, and by those who lab-created the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”. Please see, first: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/10/16/8300-spike-in-colon-cancer-that-just-means-the-jabs-are-working/, “8300% SPIKE IN COLON CANCER — THAT JUST MEANS THE JABS ARE WORKING”, by Camus. A screenshot from this article is below:

The Burning Platform article is based on the recent research by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, of VAERS reports of colon cancer since 2021 (rollout of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.”) She posted a blog article regarding her analysis, here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/colon-cancer-on-the-rise-since-2021, 7 September 2025. The huge increase in colon cancer since 2021, per the VAERS reports, appears to be in children under age 18.

Please refer to the human Chromosome Disease Maps, and the screenshots from the 2020 paper of COVID-19 infected persons in the UK, above in today’s offering, regarding human Chromosome 3 and human Chromosome 19.

BOTH human Chromosome 3 AND human Chromosome 19 (among other chromosomes) show up on the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man listing for #114500 COLORECTAL CANCER: CRC Phenotype – Gene Relationships: https://www.omim.org/entry/114500. The human Chromosomes that correlate to the COVID-19 virus itself, and therefore to the COVID-19 modRNA “vaccines”, are:

human Chromosome 3p22.1 Gene: CTNNB1 Colorectal cancer, somatic

human Chromosome 3q26.32 Gene: PIK3CA Colorectal cancer, somatic

human Chromosome 19q13.33 Gene: BAX Colorectal cancer, somatic

NONE of the above are inherited “predispositions.”

The OMIM table is below:

In Yours Truly’s opinion, there is no possible way that the detailed, precise experiments that had to have been performed with human Chromosomes 3, 6, 12, 19, and 21, in the lab-creation of the COVID-19 virus itself, and in the lab-creation of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, could have been accomplished just during the years 2019 – 2020. This is a process that would need several years of work, at the least.

Questions: What kind of POMC (Pieces of Human Excrement) would lab-create a virus, let alone a modRNA “vaccine”, that would induce colon cancer in anyone, let alone in children? What kind of medical professional would inject this type of “vaccine” into children? What kind of government agency would “recommend” that this type of “vaccine” be injected into anyone, let alone into children? What kind of “professional medical organization” (such as, the American Academy of Pediatrics) would “recommend” that this type of “vaccine” be injected into children?

IT IS OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE THAT ALL PERSONS BUILD AND MAINTAIN THEIR NATURAL IMMUNE SYSTEM TO BE IN THE BEST HEALTH POSSIBLE.

THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE. NOW.

THE ARRESTS OF THOSE WHO WERE / ARE INVOLVED IN THE ABOVE ACTIVITIES REGARDING THE LAB-CREATION OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS ITSELF, AND OF THE modRNA COVID-19 “VACCINES”, MUST START. NOW.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Intellectual Property Disclaimer: With the exception of links to scientific papers, public-domain scientific research or information websites, and news / media / Substack outlets that are on the internet, the contents of the above article are the ideas and/or conclusions of the writer, PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to the writer (PAVACA) if the ideas and/or conclusions in the above article are used by any other blog author or writer, or by persons on social media and/or on podcasts, or by persons using print media. Thank you.

Health Friday 10.10.2025 Open Thread: A Letter to Dr. Martin Makary, FDA Commissioner

The free vintage header image of writing a letter for today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none. If readers wish to post AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Today’s offering is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered negative consequences from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself after recovering from the infection; to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, and/or disabilities; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” they had in their body.

“Dr. Martin Makary, MD, MPH, Commissioner, United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD, 20993

Dear Dr. Martin Makary:

Greetings. This letter is in reference to certain questions that the writer poses regarding the FDA, under your leadership, still promoting the use of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (actually, mRNA gene therapies) in the United States. This includes the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” COMIRNATY, by Pfizer-BioNTech; the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” SPIKEVAX and NEXSPIKE, by Moderna; and, the “inactivated virus” COVID-19 “vaccine” NUVAXOVID, by Novavax. Thank you in advance for your attention. The questions follow:

Question One: Have you read through the report on BNT162b2 that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted to the FDA on 21 January 2021, regarding the Pharmacokinetics tests results for this modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (which was subsequently approved by the FDA in 2022 under the name COMIRNATY)?

Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning behind the continued FDA approval of COMIRNATY based on the results of this report? The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_phramkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, “BNT162b2 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary”, time-stamped by the FDA on 21 January 2021 at 23:22 (GMT), and starting with FDA CBER document identification number FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0013907. For your convenience, images of Page 7 and Page 8 of this report are below; first, Page 7:

And, Page 8:

The writer of this letter assumes that you understand that the BNT162b2 formulation used in the Wistar lab rats experiments above is the same formulation that the FDA granted the initial EUA to for use in the United States on 11 December 2020.

Question Two: Have you read through the Post-marketing Experience report on BNT162b2 that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted to the FDA on 30 April 2021? In particular, have you read through the APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section of this report, which begins on Page 30? The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports”, time-stamped by the FDA on 30 April 2021 at 09:26 (GMT), starting with FDA CBER document identification number FDA-CBER-2021-0000054. The APPENDIX 1. section covers only those serious adverse events reports to Pfizer-BioNTech that were submitted between 11 December 2020 (the date that the FDA granted the initial EUA for BNT162b2 to be used in the United States), and 28 February 2021 — a period of fewer than 12 weeks. There are over 1,200 different listings of serious adverse events reports in the APPENDIX 1. section of the document.

Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning behind the continuing FDA approval of COMIRNATY, given this document? Would you please answer, in detail, your reasoning why the FDA would simply accept this document without demanding an investigation of why there are so many different serious adverse events reports for BNT162b2? For you convenience, an image of Page one of the APPENDIX 1. section (Page 30 of the report document) is below:

The APPENDIX 1. section of the report runs from Page 30 to Page 38.

Question Three: Have you read the paper, published in the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology on 15 September 2021, in which the authors prove that both the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” of Pfizer-BioNTech and of Moderna, and the viral vector COVID-19 “vaccines” (for example, of Janssen), cross the placenta of a COVID-19 “vaccinated” pregnant woman and enter into the body and brain of the fetus she is carrying? And, that, similarly, these “vaccines” also cross into the breast milk of the nursing mother who was “vaccinated”, therefore also entering into her nursling’s body and brain? The paper is found here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.735394, “COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy and Lactation: Current Research and Gaps in Understanding”, Lydia L. Shook, Parisa N. Fallah, Jason N. Silberman, Andrea G. Edlow, 15 September 2021. For your convenience, a screenshot of Figure 1 from the paper is below:

Which means, according to the graphic above from the paper, that the fetus and the nursling will get COVID-19 “vaccinated” along with the mother, due to the ingredients and mechanisms that cross into the placenta and/or the breast milk from the “vaccinated” mother. The natural immune systems of a fetus or of a nursling child are not mature enough, or strong enough, to handle the antibody-manufacturing demands of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that involuntarily enter their body and brain via the “vaccinated” mother.

Would you please describe, in detail, your reasoning for the FDA continuing to recommend COVID-19 “vaccination” of pregnant women, and/or breastfeeding mothers, based on the Frontiers In paper report?

Question Four: Are you aware that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna, contain N1-Methylpseudouridine, a lab-created compound, that replaces the natural RNA in the Uridine of the “vaccinated” person’s body with this compound? Are you aware that N1-Methylpseudouridine was specifically created and included in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” because this lab-created compound facilitates the entry of the ingredients of these “vaccine” into every cell of the “vaccinated” person’s body? Are you aware that, by replacing the RNA of the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body, the multiple beneficial functions of Uridine RNA are damaged or lost? Are you aware that, among the multiple beneficial functions of Uridine RNA include cognitive elements (learning, memory), and emotional/psychological elements (mood regulation?) Are you aware that N1-Methylpseudouridine is present in all COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech? For your convenience, please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/08/health-friday-11-8-2024-open-thread-the-insidious-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-covid-19-vaccines/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/03/21/health-friday-3-21-2025-open-thread-more-on-the-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/. The Patent Declaration by Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2, which describes the inclusion of N1-Methylpseudouridine in this “vaccine”, and what it does, is found here: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021213945A1/en. For reference, the following screenshot is from this Patent Declaration:

Would you please explain, in detail, your reasoning behind why the FDA should continue to approve for use in the United States, an injectable (the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”) that specifically includes a lab-created compound (N1-Methylpseudouridine) which replaces natural Uridine RNA — and that this replacement is performed without the advance knowledge and consent of the person receiving this “vaccine?”

Question Five: The writer of this letter assumes that you, Dr. Makary, are aware that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce cardiovascular issues and conditions, such as, myocarditis and pericarditis. This would mean induction of these conditions by the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (COMIRMATY); or, by the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” (SPIKEVAX.) The writer of this letter will focus on the Moderna product. The Package Insert for the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX, is found here: https://www.fda.gov/media/155675/download. For your convenience, screenshots of the the following portions of this document are below; first, the Warnings and Precautions section:

The writer of this letter notes that the Warnings and Precautions are not enclosed in a “Black Box Warning.” Why is this the case?

Then, from section 5.2 Myocarditis and Pericarditis:

And, from section 6.2 Postmarketing Experience:

There actually is information available regarding the potential for long-term sequelae of myocarditis or pericarditis after taking COVID-19 “vaccines.” It is here: https://doi.org/10.61577/ijcri.2025.100001, “Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Vaccination: Epidemiology, outcomes, and new perspectives”, M. Nathaniel Mead, Jessica Rose, William Makis, Kirk Milhoan, Nicolas Hulscher, and Peter A. McCullough, 20 March 2025. For your convenience, a screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

And, Figure 6 from the paper, VAERS reports of myocarditis after COVID-19 “vaccination”:

Would you please describe, in detail, your reasoning why the FDA needs to continue to promote the use of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States, for any age group, based on the paper above?

Finally, Question Six: Would you please describe, in detail, what medical school and/or Residency classes you took in which you learned that it was acceptable for patients to be given injections of an mRNA gene therapy treatment platform (in this case, the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) without that injectable first having gone through a rigorous testing and analysis protocol beforehand?

Sincerely,

An independent COVID-19 researcher for the past five and a half years.”

The COVID-19 “vaccines” — ALL of them — must be removed from the market and from use. Now.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 10.3.2025 Open Thread: The Continuing Disaster of COVID-19: “Set Pieces”

The free image of an example of a theatrical set piece is courtesy of Study.com/ and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of COVID-19, it is dedicated to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered illness, injury, disability, or death from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself; or, from illness, injury, disability, or death, induced by the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their body.

Today’s offering follows a different path.

In the performing arts world, a “set piece” is a detailed design for a production. Set pieces are designed for plays, for musical theater productions, for movies, for dance or ballet productions, for opera and other large Classical music productions, and so on. Set pieces can be elaborate, or they can be “bare-bones” simple. Sometimes, there are multiple set pieces created for the production; sometimes, there are only one or two set pieces; sometimes, set pieces are built on revolving stage areas and are “rotated” according to the scene or act in the production; sometimes, extra items, such as water (in pools, as waterfalls, etc.) are incorporated into a set piece (think Esther Williams swimming movies); and so on. However, the set piece (or, set pieces) all serve to help the framework of the production and the intention behind the plot, script, or and/or music of the work. And, set pieces are designed — in almost all cases, they are not “thrown together” at the last minute; one exception is the performance of pure “improv” (improvisation; many improv performances use props only, not set pieces.)

Examples of performing arts “set pieces” of various types are below:

From Giacomo Puccini’s opera, Tosca, the final scene, in which Tosca leaps to her death from the parapets of the Castel Sant’Angelo to escape capture after she killed her tormentor, Baron Scarpia. Courtesy of the Metropolitan Opera, 2024-2025 season:

Yours Truly will note that the “other side” of the Castel Sant’Angelo set piece has multiple layers of foam pads, trained stage technicians, and first-aid personnel on hand to make quite sure that the singer playing Tosca lands safely. The “leap scene” rehearsal related to the Metropolitan Opera 2024 – 2025 season production is on video, here: https://www.facebook.com/MetOpera/videos/puccini-tosca-jump-rehearsal/568495235373588/.

An example of a water “set piece” from the Esther Williams 1952 movie, Million Dollar Mermaid. Courtesy loveletterstooldhollywood.blogspot.com/:

A set piece from a performance of Samuel Becket’s stage play, Waiting for Godot. Courtesy of Wikipedia:

“Set Pieces” in the COVID-19 disaster:

In the COVID-19 disaster, there have been well-designed, elaborate “set pieces” employed, such as: the “mandating” of lockdowns; the “universal masking”; the deliberate withholding of important information from then-President Donald Trump 45 regarding the ingredients and mechanisms of the COVID-19 “vaccines” in development during “Operation Warp Speed; the subsequent rollout of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; the marginalizing and ostracizing of those who had any reservations about the “safety and efficacy” of these “vaccines”; the persecution / prosecution / loss of medical licenses, of those who began to investigate and to write about the dangers and deadliness of these “vaccines” — for only a few examples. These “set pieces” affected millions of people, who were coerced and/or gaslighted-frightened into being “actors” (such as, standing six feet away from other persons; “following the science” and taking multiple injections of COVID-19 “vaccines”.) Others were labelled as “anti-vaxxers” because they refused to take the “vaccines.” All were, at the same time, also forced to be “spectators” (watching their children suffer from not being able to attend school during the “lockdowns”; losing jobs, family relationships, friends, and colleagues; watching COVID-19 “vaccinated” loved ones, friends, and colleagues begin to succumb to COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, disabilities, or death.)

It appears that new “set pieces” regarding the COVID-19 “vaccines” in the United States are being created and put into place. One such new “set piece” involves, among other items, the 19 September 2025 ACIP “recommendation” that COVID-19 “vaccine” administration be restricted to persons age 65 and over; and, to persons who are deemed to be at “high risk of severe complications from a COVID-19 infection”, as per the FDA’s “new approach”, outlined here: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to Covid-19 Vaccination”, Martin Makary, MD MPH, and Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH, published 20 May 2025. Figure 2 from this “opinion piece”, which lists the populations of Americans at “high risk”, and should therefore take a COVID-19 “vaccine”, is below. Note: the age 65 and older category is already “assumed” to be a high risk:

The CDC’s ACIP group “recommendations” from the September 2025 meeting are summarized here: https://www.hhw.gov/press-room/acip-recommends-covid-19-vaccination-individual-decision-making.html. A screenshot from this article is below:

However, “individual decision-making” runs counter to what “Establishment Medicine” organizations, such as the AMA, advises physicians to do. For example, in the AMA podcast interview with Sean O’Leary, MD, published 30 April 2025, found here: https://edhub.ama-assn-org/jn-learning/audio-player/18969411, “Strategies for Talking With Parents About Vaccines.” This audio interview is a must-listen. Dr. O’Leary describes the AMA “talking points” regarding pushing “vaccination” for young children (including newborns) along the lines of “presumptive” (“your child is due now to have X vaccines”) discussion with parents, as opposed to “participatory” (“what do you think about vaccination?”) discussion with parents. Dr. O’Leary makes it clear that “presumptive” discussion results in more agreement from the parents to have their young children “vaccinated.” Dr. O’Leary also speaks about “pre-bunking”, the process of minimizing / dismissing “vaccine misinformation” or “vaccine disinformation” from “anti-vaxxers”; instead, the physician is urged to “steer” the “vaccine”-hesitant or “vaccine”-questioning parent to “trusted websites” like the ones from the AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics, which endorses “vaccination” of all kinds for children, including from birth, and including the COVID-19 “vaccines.”) In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics https://www.aap.org/ has issued its own “recommended childhood vaccine schedule”, in contravention to the revised Childhood Immunization Schedule of the CDC. Below are screenshots of the “AAP recommended vaccines”, the “AAP recommended vaccination schedule”, and, the “AAP recommended vaccination schedule by medical condition”, below:

Note that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “recommended” by the AAP for all children ages 6 months and older — for healthy children; for immunocompromised children; and, for children with heart disease, and other medical conditions.

Another “set piece” was added this week: the email from Jack Leeming, an “editor” at the journal Nature, that he sent to selected blog authors at Substack. These blog authors work every day to investigate and write about the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Among the blog authors contacted by Jack Leeming are: Sasha Latypova; Alex Berenson; and, Dr. Peter A. McCulloug, MD. In this email, Leeming is requesting their “input” before Nature publishes a “hit piece” on them. Apparently, this “hit piece” will try to do the following:

Defame Substack blog authors who are doing all they can to spread the actual truth about the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines”;

Pressure Substack into imposing “content moderation” (translation: censorship) of these blogs;

Pressure Substack into “de-monetizing” these blogs.

Pressure Substack into showcasing “COVID-19 vaccine friendly” blogs.

Sasha Latypova wrote about the email she received from Leeming. Please see: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/journal-nature-is-planning-a-hit, “Journal Nature is planning a hit piece about me. This is my response to their “request for comment.””, 1 October 2025. A screenshot of Leeming’s email to her, via her blog article, is below:

Ms. Latypova’s reply, which is also in her article, takes Leeming and his email apart. A portion of her reply is in the screenshot below:

All of the above begs the questions: Who (and/or What) are in the “Control Booth” regarding the “set pieces” of the COVID-19 disaster? Who (and/or What) are telling those in the “Control Booth” what to do?

THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM USE. NOW.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 9.19.2025 Open Thread: Remove the COVID-19 “Vaccines” from the Market and from Use. Now.

The free header image for today’s offering is courtesy of Dreamstime.com/ and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks of the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections), Yours Truly dedicates it to all those persons who have taken these “vaccines” and have since suffered injuries, illnesses, or disabilities, resulting from them; and, to the memory of all those persons who have taken these “vaccines” but who then passed away due to their deleterious effects. The foregoing is not a kind of “boilerplate” — it is to help ensure that those who have suffered from taking these “vaccines” are not forgotten.

Yours Truly begins here: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/09/07/the-massive-covid-vaccine-deception/, “THE MASSIVE COVID VACCINE DECEPTION”, by Camus. Please see the screenshots below of portions of the statements by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.:

“For the first six weeks, the vaccine is ineffective.” Not so fast. The following is proof that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are “effective” — not in the “official government statements” ways (“prevention of COVID-19”; “reducing risk of severe infection and death from COVID-19”, etc.), but instead in the multiple negative ways in which these injectables were designed to be, and are still designed to be, from the moment they are injected into a person’s body. Please note: the list below is not exhaustive. The following are examples of what may be termed the “Actual Efficacy” of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”:

They kill: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/new-analysis-of-the-czech-covid-vaccines, “New analysis of the Czech COVID vaccine data reveals that the mRNA shots were deadly for all ages. They should be pulled from the market.”, 28 August 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below, which shows that death occurred in COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons in the Czech Republic within a month after said “vaccination“:

The death rates from COVID-19 “vaccination” began to rise on 1 June 2021, the start date of the statistical analysis timefrane on the chart above.

They cause myocarditis and/or pericarditis among the COVID-19 “vaccinated“: The “primary source material” proof on this situation is furnished by Pfizer-BioNTech itself — the BNT162b2 Post-authorization report that the company gave to the FDA on 30 April 2021. The report is found here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021”, by Worldwide Safety, Pfizer-BioNTech. The APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section begins on Page 30 of this report. This section lists the 1,291 types of serious adverse events reported among persons who took BNT162b2 between 11 December 2020 (the date that the FDA granted the initial Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for this modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”), and the end of February 2021 — a span of only 79 days (11.2 weeks.) Please see Page 6 of the APPENDIX 1 section (Page 35 of the report), where “Myocarditis” listed; and, Page 7 of the same section (Page 36 of the report), where “Pericarditis” is listed. Screenshots of the salient portions of each page are below; first, of Page 6:

And, of Page 7:

They cause permanent alteration of the DNA of the LINE-1 cells of the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body (this permanent alteration is accomplished within 48 hours after “vaccination”): Please see: https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073, “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line”, Markus Alden, Yang De Marinis, et al., 22 February 2022. Figure 2 from this paper is below. BNT162b2 is reverse transcribed into LINE-1 human liver cells within 48 hours post-“vaccination”, resulting in permanent alteration of the DNA of these cells:

They cross the Blood-Brain Barrier and facilitate entry of the spike protein into the cerebral arteries: Please see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111223, “Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemhorragic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination.”, Nakao Ota, et al., June 2025. A screenshot of the Highlights section of this paper is below:

They replace all of the RNA of the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body with the lab-created compound, N1-Methylpseudouridine. This replacement “turns off” the functions of the natural Uridine. The N1-Methylpseudouridine then acts as a “facilitator” for the spread of the ingredients of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” throughout the body; and, via the vagus nerve (which natural Uridine helps to regulate the functions and mechanisms thereof), into the brain. Please see https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51301-0, “N1-Methylpseudouridine and pseudouridine modifications modulate mRNA decoding during translation”, Kristin S Koutmou, et al., 16 September 2024. A screenshot of a portion of the Introduction of this paper is below:

“Substitute” the RNA of the Uridine is a fancy way of saying, “Destroys the RNA, then replaces it with N1-Methylpseudouridine.”

By the way, the “primary source document” regarding the fact that N1-Methylpseudouridine destroys all of the natural RNA of the Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body (along with details and descriptions of the other ingredients in BNT162b2, such as the inclusion of lipid nanoparticles) is found in the Worldwide Patent declaration for BNT162b2 by Pfizer-BioNTech. This document was published on 28 October 2021. It is found here: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021213945A1/en, “CORONAVIRUS VACCINE”, by Pfizer-BioNTech. Click on “Download PDF” for the entire document.

They cause serious Central Nervous System (CNS) issues, since they cross the Blood-Brain Barrier: Multiple CNS issues result from modRNA COVID-19 “vaccination”; among them, new-onset Multiple Sclerosis. Again, the “primary source document” for this is the 5.3.6 Post-Authorization report cited above. Please see the salient portion of Page 6 of the APPENDIX 1. section of this report (Page 35 of the report), below:

Please also see: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577785, “New diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in the setting of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine exposure”, Karlo Toljan, et al., 9 December 2021. A screenshot of section 3.2 Case 2 from this paper is below:

They accumulate COVID-19 “vaccine” ingredients (modRNA, spike protein, lipid nanoparticles, and all the other elements of this injectable) in every organ and area of the “vaccinated” body: Please see another “primary source document” from Pfizer-BioNTech regarding this situation. The document is found here: https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_26_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, “BNT162b2 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary”, by Pfizer-BioBNTech. The company gave this document to the FDA on 21 January 2021. Page 7 and Page 8 of the document are below; first, Page 7:

And, Page 8:

Please note that these accumulations begin to occur within 30 minutes after injection with BNT162b2. Please also note that the formulation used in the Wistar lab rats experiments above is the same formulation that was granted the initial FDA Emergency Use Authorization for use in the United States on 11 December 2020; and was subsequently FDA-approved under the name COMIRNATY.

In terms of the “waning efficacy” of the COVID-19 “vaccines”: It was shown in the large Penn State University study of 2022 that COVID-19 “vaccine efficacy” wanes badly by the fifth month after “vaccination”; in fact, the “efficacy” begins to wane well before that. Please see https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y, “SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis”, Paddy Ssentengo, et al., 7 May 2022. A screenshot of the Results section of this paper is below:

VE = Vaccine Effectiveness

It is also known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” do not prevent COVID-19 infection; they do not prevent death from COVID-19 infection in “vaccinated” persons; they do not prevent the spread of the virus; and, that any “efficacy” from these injectables wanes almost completely well before seven months post-“vaccination.” In short, the COVID-19 “vaccines” are ineffective in what they were / are “officially” designed to do. On the other hand, these injectables are “effective” in causing “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, disabilities, and death.

HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr.: All COVID-19 “vaccines” must be pulled off the market and removed from use. Now. There is no rational reason why these injectables are still being authorized, approved, or administered. The Amendment 12 to the PREP Act regarding COVID-19 Medical Countermeasures, signed by former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra in December 2024, must be rescinded. Bring those who lab-created the COVID-19 “vaccines” brought to account. Get Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Azithromycin / Doxycycline, Zinc, NAC, and Quercetin all FDA-approved for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection. Get these items made readily available to the general public and also to medical professionals.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 9.5.2025 Open Thread: Human LINE-1, Chromosomes, and the modRNA COVID-19 “Vaccines”: Part One

The header image for today’s offering is courtesy of https://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/37/21-24/948.full, “LINE-1 retrotransposition and its regulation in cancers: implications for therapeutic opportunities”, Carlos Mendez-Dorantes, and Kathleen H. Burns, 13 December 2023.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks of the disaster of COVID-19 (the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location: who have contracted a COVID-19 infection and recovered from it, but who also have residual complications from the infection; who have suffered COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injury, illness, disability, or “Long COVID”; or, who have passed away, either from complications from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or from COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced issues caused by these “vaccines” they had in their body.

Today’s offering is Part One of two. It is not a lesson on human anatomy or on human genetics: it is a presentation of some of the most-recent information regarding the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections.) Yours Truly will emphasize at the start that more and more information that exposes these dangers and deadliness is coming out by the week — the “information trickle” of previous years regarding this situation is becoming a torrent. There is also information that potentially links some of the deleterious effects of the COVID- 19 “vaccines” back to the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself. Please bear with me: what may look like “diffuse parts” are all important pieces of the whole.

There is some “background information” that is necessary to “lay the groundwork” for the rest of today’s offering. Yours Truly begins here, with a paper by Ralph Baric, PhD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, from 2006. The paper is found here: https://www.jcvi.org/sites/default/assets/projects/synthetic-genomics-options-for-governance/Baric-Synthetic-Viral-Genomics.pdf, “Synthetic Viral Genomics: Risks and Benefits for Science and Society”, Ralph S. Baric, PhD. In Yours Truly’s opinion, this paper can be viewed as a “blueprint” for the future Gain-of-Function (GoF) lab-experimentation with, and the lab-creation of, viruses such as the Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus; and the more-recent GoF experiments with strains of the H5N1 (Avian Influenza) virus. Please see the screenshots from Dr. Baric’s 2006 paper, below:

YT: Note the mentions, right at the start in the paper, about “biological warfare” and “biodefense.”

YT: The above images are from the Baric 2206 paper. Figure 4b appears to “outline” how to lab-create (Gain-of-Function work) of “synthetic coronavirus” genome codes.

Yours Truly will specially point out the passage above, “…data will provide detailed predictions regarding easy approaches to humanize zoonotic strains by retargeting the attachment proteins to recognize human, not the animal receptors (43-45).” This, in my opinion, is a direct “tie-in” to the gene code pieces from the Pangolin MP789 coronavirus that were used in the lab-creation of the original Wuhan Hu1 SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19 virus) itself — the same virus that is the foundation of all the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, including the “booster shots” and the “latest formula vaccines.” The MP789 coronavirus gene code has multiple “areas” that the human body can be receptive to — including the PRRAR / PRRARSV “backdoor key” to nucleus of every cell. Please see the following for more information about MP789 and its connection to the PRRARSV “backdoor key” that both the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna contain: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/05/01/pfizer-and-moderna-vaccines-both-contain-the-prrarsv-key-to-the-cell-nucleus/; https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/22/health-friday-11-22-2024-open-thread-lets-talk-about-prrarsv-the-backdoor-key/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/27/placeholder-open-thread-11-27-2024-prrarsv-part-2-pangolin-edition/.

There is also something else of interest to point out regarding one of the References in the 2006 Baric paper: Reference 45. The referenced paper is found here: https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600640, “Receptor and viral determinants of SARS- coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2.”, Li, W., et al., 24 March 2005. This paper discusses the GoF experiments performed to determine and then lab-create elements of various rat and palm civet coronaviruses to the ACE2 receptor cells of humans. Recall that rat and civet coronaviruses experiments were performed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the process of lab-creating the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus itself. Please see the screenshots from the paper, below. The first is from the authors’ “summary” a the top of the paper; the second is the end of the Discussion section of the paper:

Ralph Baric, PhD, was also working on the “cross-species adaptation and transmission” aspects of SARS- coronaviruses. For example, this paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2838128/, “Recombination, Reservoirs, and the Modular Spike: Mechanisms of Coronavirus Cross-Species Transmission”, Rachel L Graham, Ralph S Baric, 11 November 2009. The paper specifically discusses Spike 1 residues and ACE2 receptor cells in coronaviruses found in Himalayan palm civets; bats; and raccoon dogs — and the possibility that these coronaviruses can “leap” to humans.

And now, with the above as part of the context, Yours Truly presents LINE-1. First, via Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LINE1):

And, Second, from ActiveMotif (https://www.activemotif.com/blog-line-1, “LINE-1 Elements: Walk the LINE-1”, Michelle Tetrault Carlson, PhD, 13 September 2022):

LINE-1 cells are found throughout the human body. LINE-1 aberrations are involved in the following conditions: Genetic disease; cancers (lung; ovarian; bladder; colon; breast; brain [glioma]; and, liver.) LINE-1 aberrations / changes are also involved in aging and “aging related diseases” (per the article above, in the “LINE-1 and Aging” section.)

LINE-1 (also called L1) cells have been studied for some time; in particular, the association between L1 “retrotransposition” and disease. This is important in the context of what will be discussed next.

L1 cells can be “retrotransposed.” This will create “genetic instability.” Such retrotransposition can occur as an aberration resulting from genetic predisposition in the body. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00839-5, “Human L1 Retrotransposition Is Associated with Genetic Instability”, David E. Symer, et al., 9 August 2002. The Abstract from this paper is below:

This paper also discusses the role of SV40 in L1 retrotransposition. In addition, there is a section entitled, “L1 Is an Engine for Genetic Change.”

“Transposed” L1 cells can be involved in the establishment of cancers: https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.351051.123, “LINE-1 retrotransposition and its deregulation in cancers: implications for therapeutic opportunities”, Carlos Mendez-Dorantes, Kathleen H. Burns, 13 December 2023. Please see the screenshot from this paper (a graphical “process image” of L1 being “retrotransposed”), below:

The alarm bells have been ringing regarding the dangers of LINE-1 (L1) retrotranposition (“reverse transcription”) effect of the modCOVID-19 “vaccines” for some time. Examples: the “Maurol, et al.” paper of March 2022: https://www.hilarispublisher.com/articles/intracellular-reverse-transcription-of-covid19-mrna-vaccine-eminvitroem-in-human-cell-87770.html, “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine In-Vitro in Human Cell.”, Maurol, Luisette Mauro, Naseer Almukthar, Tarro Giulio, and Gamal abdul Hamid, et al., J Genet DNA Res6(2022):116. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

YT: Note the mention of a timeframe of 5-10 years that is needed to study the effects of the “transcription activity.” Keep this in mind when reading the end of today’s offering.

Then, there is the “Alden, et al.” paper from April 2022: https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73, “Intracellular Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line”, Markus Alden, Yang De Marinis, et al., 11 April 2022. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. The first is from the paper itself; the second, an image of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 reverse transcription of DNA, is Slide 14 from the Doctors for COVID Ethics article (https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, August 2022):

And, the “Acevedo-Whitehouse and Bruno” paper from February 2023: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2023.111015, “Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis”, K. Acevedo-Whitehouse, R. Bruno, 6 February 2023. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below; the first is part of the Abstract; the second is the end of the Consequences and discussion section:

Which all lead to this, from Dr. Peter McCullough in May 2025: https://www.americaoutloud.news/genetic-bombshell-covid-19-vaccines-change-the-human-genome/, 24 May 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below. First, this one:

This harks back to the information that there are natural reasons for DNA alteration in a person’s body (for example, inherited genetic aberrations.) **** However, the issue here is the fact that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna contain ingredients and mechanisms that deliberately and permanently alter the DNA of the human LINE-1 cell lines of any person who takes these “vaccines” — even one injection of them. This includes DNA alteration in the body of a fetus of an expectant mother who takes modCOVID-19 “vaccines”, due to the fact that these “vaccines” cross the placenta and into the body of the fetus. (And, by the way, those same ingredients and mechanisms are present in all “descendant clone” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” made by these companies, including the “booster shots” and the “latest version formula” injectables. This is because these are based on, and contain elements of, the original modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by these companies.)

Then, the second screenshot, below:

YT: **** Please read this phrase again, from Dr. McCullough, regarding the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna: “…sadly, both Pfizer and Moderna do permanently alter DNA via reverse transcription.” It is the “permanently alter DNA via reverse transcription” effects from these injectables that the COVID-19 “vaccinated” in the United States and all over the world are starting to present. It is impossible that the FDA did not know about the potential DNA-altering effects of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” — especially after scientific papers were published which demonstrated that this indeed is the case.

Another piece of the situation has just been published: According to the CDC, 76.4% of all American adults have at least one chronic disease (2023 figures), compared to baseline 2013 figures. The CDC paper is here: https://cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2025/04_0539.htm#ContribAff, “Trends in Multiple Chronic Conditions Among US Adults, By Life Stage, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013 – 2023”, Kathleen B. Watson, MD, et al., 17 April 2025. All of the authors of this paper are either employees of the CDC; or, of the United States Uniformed Health Services. While it is true that chronic diseases, such as arthritis, can develop for many reasons during adult years, there is NOT ONE WORD in this paper regarding COVID-19 “vaccination” in this age group (18 years – 65+ years) being involved in the increase of any of the chronic diseases that are listed. In other words — the CDC still has its “head firmly in the sand” regarding the dangers and deadliness of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, and the role of these “vaccines” in inducing and/or aggravating multiple types of chronic conditions.

**** What are “COVID-19 “vaccinated” Joe or Jane Average American” going to do when they find out and understand (which they will, eventually) that the most fundamental “building block” of their body — their DNA — was deliberately and permanently altered without their knowledge or consent, if they took any injection of a Pfizer-BioNTech or a Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”? That it doesn’t matter when the “vaccine” injection was put into their body, or how many injections? That their modRNA COVID-19 “vaccinated” children ALSO had their DNA deliberately and permanently altered without their parents’ or guardian’s knowledge or consent? That the state and local governments who “mandated” or legislated that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” be taken by their children in order for them to attend school were complicit in the DNA alteration in their children?

**** What will “COVID-19 “vaccinated” Joe or Jane Average American” do when they find out and understand (which they will, eventually) that the altered DNA in their “vaccinated” body will “lurk” in the body and brain, creating permanent dysfunction of multiple organs of said body, until a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injury, illness, or disability presents later on? That is very likely no “cure” or “turning the clock back” for this altered DNA in the “vaccinated” body?

**** What will “COVID-19 “vaccinated” Joe or Jane Average American” do when they find out and understand (which they will, eventually) that the medical professionals they trusted when they took the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” have betrayed them at the most basic level —“Do No Harm”— by not doing the investigation which would have alerted them to this danger — but, which medical professionals, instead, followed the CDC / FDA / AMA mantras of, “The COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective”, and “The known and potential benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the known and potential risks”?

The people who included the elements and mechanisms in the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” that guarantee the deliberate and permanent reverse-transcription of the LINE-1 DNA of every COVID-19 “vaccinated” person; the people who knew about these reverse-transcription elements and mechanisms, but still allowed EUAs and “FDA full approval” of these “vaccines” to proceed; the people who intentionally withheld vital information regarding the real dangers and deadliness of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” from President Trump45 during “Operation Warp Speed”; the people who, even today, are still “recommending” COVID-19 “vaccination” for anyone of any age (paging Dr. Martin Makary, current FDA Commissioner) — all must answer for their actions. All modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” must be removed from use and pulled off the market — now.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 8.22.2025 Open Thread: “Clean Sweep” Edition: An Opinion Piece

The header image of smallpox vaccination in Paris in 1905 used in today’s offering is courtesy of Alamy and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks of the disaster of COVID-19, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered injuries, illnesses, or disabilities, either COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced, or as the result of a COVID-19 infection; and, to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away either from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” they had in their bodies, or as the result of a COVID-19 infection.

“Clean Sweep.” This means completely dismantling the FDA (the Food and Drug Administration); the NIH (the National Institutes of Health); and, the NIAID (the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), all of which are divisions of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) — and completely rebuilding them from the top down. Why “Clean Sweep” for these divisions? Because it is becoming more apparent by the week that they are more devoted to using “career” medical bureaucrats/officials, many of whom are “holdovers” from the “Collins / Fauci era” in the NIH and NIAID; they are more devoted to injecting American citizens with the proven-dangerous, proven-deadly COVID-19 “vaccines” than they are to approving readily-available, cheap drugs (such as, Ivermectin) and other therapeutics (such as, Zinc) to prevent or to treat COVID-19 infection; and, they are more devoted to pushing through injectables via “Fast Track” or “accelerated approval” methods, rather than taking the time to fully test and analyze test data. “Completely rebuilding them from the top down” means establishing entirely redesigned divisions that are fully devoted to the betterment of the public health.

Yours Truly presents a transcript of the op-ed published in the Washington Post on 12 August 2025 by Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the current Director of the NIH (National Institutes of Health); the op-ed appears here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinons/2025/08/12/nih-mrna-vaccines-jay-bhattacharya/, “Jay Bhattacharya: Why the NIH is pivoting away from mRNA vaccines”, 12 August 2025. Yours Truly provides her personal commentary, which will appear in Bold and surrounded in brackets. (The Washington Post op-ed is behind a paywall; Yours Truly is indebted to Shannon Joy, whose X tweet has the entire article: https://xcancel.com/ShannonJoy/status/1956140133474034025.) Note: Yours Truly will make it clear that the commentary is done with all due respect to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD.

The transcript:
“The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ decision to wind down its mRNA vaccine development activities marks a necessary pivot in how we steward public health innovation in vaccines. The right path requires us to consider the inherent strengths and weaknesses of a technology as well as any alternatives, along with public attitudes and experience with the technology. The mRNA platform is promising technology. I do not dispute its potential. In the future, it may yet deliver breakthroughs in treating diseases such as cancer, and HHS is continuing to invest in ongoing research in oncology and other complex diseases.”

[YT: First of all, if HHS is truly going to “wind down” mRNA vaccine development, why is Moderna being allowed to progress to Phase 3 clinical trials of its modRNA “vaccine” against CMV (Cytomegalovirus), mRNA-1647? This “vaccine” contains six different mRNA sequences, two different antigens, the dangerous lipid nanoparticle SM-102 (the same LNP that is in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX), and apparently targets both the IgG immune system cells and the CD4-CD8 cells of the body. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01603-23, “Characterization of humoral and cellular immunologic responses to an mRNA-based human cytomegalovirus vaccine from a phase 1 trial of healthy adults”, Kai Wu, et al.; J Virol. 2024 Mar 25;18(4):e01603-23. Please refer to Fig. 2 and Fig.4. Secondly, the current modRNA (aka mRNA) COVID-19 “vaccines” have demonstrated that they do not have “inherent strengths”: in fact, they only have what may be called “inherent dangers.” These “inherent dangers” include: altering of the LINE1 Human Liver cell line; replacement of natural Uridine RNA with the lab-created N1-Methylpseudouridine; crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier to attack areas of the brain that are not protected by this barrier (for example, the Pituitary Gland); causing autoimmune attack on heart tissue via aggregation of lymphocytes induced by the COVID-19 “vaccines” in that organ; and, causing infiltration of lymphocytes in lung tissue. Regarding the DNA alteration, and heart and lung damage, caused by the COVID-19 “vaccines”, please see: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, Slide 9 through Slide 14. Thirdly, why on Earth is oncology (cancer study, diagnosis, and treatment) included in the phrase “and other complex diseases?” Yours Truly calls this a writing mistake; however, one believes someone should have proofread the op-ed for “context or syntax” issues before publication.]

“But as a vaccine intended for broad public use, especially during a public health emergency, the platform has failed a crucial test: earning public trust. No matter how elegant the science, a platform that lacks credibility among the people it seeks to protect cannot fulfill its public health mission.”

[YT: The “public trust” for the COVID-19 “vaccines” was destroyed when it was proven that hundreds of persons who took these injectables passed away from immediate heart attacks induced by them just after being injected; when “vaccinated” persons began to present with myocarditis or pericarditis after being injected; when stillbirths and miscarriages began to be reported among pregnant women who had been injected; and much, much more. And, by the way, the initial modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” rollout in December 2020 was intended for the elderly and for healthcare workers; it was when the “COVID-19 health emergency” was declared in March 2021 that the “vaccines” began to be “mandated” for all persons. “Elegant science?” Does “elegant science” include the kind of “science” that was rushed through the initial EUAs for the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” without proper testing and data analyses?]

“It is critical to understand the development of the mRNA coronavirus vaccines in the context of the very successful Operation Warp Speed launched during the first Trump administration.”

[YT: Does “the development of the mRNA coronavirus vaccines” include the fact that neither Pfizer-BioNTech, nor Moderna, had never previously brought a successful mRNA injectable to market prior to “Operation Warp Speed?” And that Dr. Albert Bourla, DVM, the CEO of PfizerUSA, admitted on video that he had been “convinced” by Pfizer scientists to use the then-new and unproven mRNA technology in a COVID-19 “vaccine?” (10 March 2022, “Albert Bourla on why mRNA technology was “counterintuitive” to producing an effective vaccine”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9_YRw7jBF4.)]

“Operation Warp Speed represented a paradigm shift in how the government should invest in new technologies and solutions and embrace strategic investments in public-private partnerships, innovation in trial design and removal of bureaucratic red tape to allow parallel rather than sequential vaccine development. It produced a new vaccine in record time and also helped develop a successful monoclonal antibody.”

[YT: Really? “Embrace strategic partnerships in public-private partnerships?” What about that “public-private partnership” document between the NIAID and Moderna, which includes development of RNA-based vaccines, and that was filed with the SEC in 2015, several years BEFORE the COVID-19 disaster? That “partnership” is still going on, with patent-ownership sharing, royalty payments sharing, “partnering” in developing new COVID-19 “vaccines”, and so on, until at least 2041. “Innovation in trial design?” — Meaning the “Next Gold Generation Standard”, announced in May 2025, in which lab testing with animals using humane, safe protocols, then progressing to better and safer human-subject testing, may well be replaced with “Petri-dish testing” only” for new “vaccines”? “Parallel vaccine development?” — Meaning that “Universal Vaccine” that’s touted in the “Next Gold Generation Standard?”]

“Unfortunately, the Biden administration did not manage public trust in the coronavirus vaccines, largely because it chose a strategy of mandates rather than a risk-based approach and did not properly acknowledge Americans’ growing concerns regarding safety and effectiveness.”

[YT: So, “risk-based approach?” Like the “risk populations chart” in the “opinion piece” that Dr.Martin Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad published in the New England Journal of Medicine in May 2025 (https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929, “An Evidence-Based Approach to Covid-19 Vaccination”— a chart in which, for example, even healthy pregnant women are considered to be at “risk” for “severe complications from COVID-19” and should get COVID-19 “vaccinated?” And what about the statements about how the “known and potential benefits of the for COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the known and potential risks?” — like the one here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/planning/children/6-things-to-know.html, “6 Things to Know about COVID-19 Vaccination for Children.“]

“Consider the data: In a late 2024 Pew Research Center survey, 60 percent of American adults reported no intention of getting an updated coronavirus mRNA vaccine despite the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s advice that nearly all adults receive yet another dose. As of late April 2025 (the latest data published reported by the CDC), only 13 percent of children between the ages of 6 months and 17 years had received an updated coronavirus vaccine, even though the Biden-era CDC had placed the vaccine on the childhood immunization schedule.”

[YT: It appears that the real reason behind why “only 13 percent of children between the ages of 6 months and 17 years had received an updated coronavirus vaccine” is that their parents or guardians have concluded that these “vaccines” are more dangerous than helpful. And how did these adults come to this conclusion? Because of the news spreading that these “vaccines” cause myocarditis / pericarditis in children; because of the news spreading that these “vaccines” do not prevent COVID-19 infection, but instead actually damage the “vaccinated” person’s immune system, making it vulnerable to COVID-19 infection; and so on. In Yours Truly’s opinion, the COVID-19 “vaccines” have no place in the CDC Childhood Immunization Schedule whatever — due to the foregoing and other reasons.]

“In 2021, the Biden administration’s HHS spent nearly a billion dollars on a campaign supporting the coronavirus vaccine, the most expensive pharmaceutical campaign in history. The government spent the money on a vast number of TV, radio and internet spots, which misinformed the American public that the vaccine would protect them from contracting and spreading covid. Nevertheless, just a few years later, less than half the U.S. adult population will heed the CDC’s guidance. Some outlets have blamed the poor coronavirus mRNA vaccine uptake on poor messaging or “anti-vax” counter-messaging. But the Biden administration made suppression of speech — and a mandate for all on the vaccines — into a priority.”

[YT: Perhaps Dr. Bhattacharya should look at the FDA Package Insert for the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, COMIRNATY (Pfizer-BioNTech), section 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE. The Package Insert is here: https://www.fda.gov/media/151707/download. Notice that the FDA officially states that COMIRNATY is “to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19.)” Is the FDA “spreading misinformation?”

“The failure was thus not a communications problem. It is a trust problem due to the Biden administration’s scientific overreach, public pressure and, frankly, arrogance.”

[YT: Does this mean that “the new FDA”, and the “Next Generation Gold Standard”, and the “accelerated approval” of “vaccines” that may be lab-created in Petri-dishes will somehow magically restore public trust?]

“In addition to the trust problem, the mRNA technology has special biological features that make it different from other vaccines in that it (ideally) instructs our cells to produce proteins that subsequently invoke an immune response. To do so with complete confidence about vaccine safety and efficacy requires an exact understanding of dosage, biodistribution and off-target effects. Unfortunately, we fall short in all three. We lack clarity on how much antigen each mRNA molecule produces, where in the body the mRNA product winds up, how long it stays in the body, and whether unintended proteins are created.”

[YT: Unfortunately, this paragraph, in Yours Truly’s opinion, “has more holes than a Swiss cheese.” First: the mRNA “vaccines” do instruct the cells of the “vaccinated” person to “invoke an immune response”: that “response”, among other things, causes multiple types of autoimmune attack within the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body — for example, in the heart (please refer above to the article by Doctors For COVID Ethics.) Second: Perhaps Dr. Bhattacharya would like to read this report, which Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA in January 2021, regarding the biodistribution of BNT162b2 (FDA-approved in 2022 as COMIRNATY.) The report is here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M2_pharmkin-tabulated-summary.pdf, “MODULE 2.6.5. PHARMACOKINETICS TABULATED SUMMARY.” Yours Truly has included images of Page 7 and Page 8 of this report, which are the Biodistribution Tables for BNT162b2. (The BNT162b2 used in this experiment is the same one that was granted the initial FDA for use in the United States in December 2020.) Third: Stephanie Seneff, PhD, and Greg Nigh, wrote back in 2021 about the unintended consequences of the mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” creating “unintended proteins.” Their paper is here: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Worse-Than-the-Disease-Reviewing-Some-Possible-of-Seneff-Nigh/, “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”, 16 June 2021, International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research 2(1), May 10,2021 Page 389 – 430. The point is: there is an “exact understanding” of multiple aspects regarding the mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” already.]

“From a regulatory perspective, getting approval for a vaccine with such inherent uncertainties should be difficult.”

[YT: Agreed— except that the “new FDA” is doing exactly that already (such as the recent FDA “approval” without any human trials testing of the “2025-2026 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines” by Pfizer-BioNTech, by Moderna, and by Novavax.)]

“Still, I do not believe the mRNA vaccines caused either mass harm on the one hand or saved 14 million lives on the other. Those estimates swing wildly based on speculative modeling, not concrete evidence. A recent modeling study conluded that the global coronavirus vaccination campaign saved 2.5 million lives from 2020 to 2024, mainly among the elderly.”

[YT: “Still I do not believe the mRNA vaccines caused either mass harm…” Really, Dr. Bhattacharya? Did you read through the OpenVAERS website? (https://openvaers.com/) Have you read through the thousands of actual reports of persons who took a COVID-19 “vaccine” and then either died from the injection, or had serious medical issues afterwards from the injection? Are you saying that these reports are “wildly based on speculative modeling?” Are you saying that these reports are not “concrete evidence?” Are you dismissing the extensive work of Ed Dowd, who analyzes statistical reports of claims from insurance companies, claims that have skyrocketed since the COVID-19 “vaccine” rollout in 2021? https://phinancetechnologies.com/, then click on the “Our Projects” PDF brochure on the webpage to find the “Current Projects” section, then click on any of the green arrows.]

“The scientific controversy over the vaccine’s effect on mortality rages on. Science isn’t propaganda agenda. It’s humility.”

[YT: Real science is truth. There isn’t a “controversy” about the “vaccine’s effect on mortality” — the COVID-19 “vaccines” have increased mortality across the board and across the world. Have you read Steve Kirsch’s Substack, Dr. Bhattacharya? (https://kirschsubstack.com/). Mr. Kirsch’s Substack has many articles that quote studies which show that the COVID-19 “vaccines” increase mortality across the board. However, since Mr. Kirsch is not a medical professional, that removes him from “credibility” in the medical professional world, as far as the NIH is concerned? It doesn’t matter that Mr. Kirsch makes his living from collecting and analyzing data (financial and medical)?]

“And when public health officials stopped communicating with humility, we lost much of the public, an absolute necessity for any vaccine platform.”

[YT: Actually: It’s when public health officials withheld the truth about the dangers and the deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (which the FDA knew about back in early 2021 — please see here: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf, “5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021.” Please go to the APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST section.) — and the public had to find out the truth themselves — that public health officials “lost much of the public.”]

“I am not here to litigate the past. I am here to chart a better path forward. That is why the NIH, under the leadership of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is investing in new vaccine technologies based on whole-virus inactivated vaccines, which offer a broader immune response and have a longer track record of safety and public acceptance.”

[YT: So, here, apparently, is the “kernel” of the op-ed. Dr. Bhattacharya is not interested in anything related to how dangerous and deadly the current types of COVID-19 “vaccines” have been, and still are. “Let bygones be bygones and just move on” seems to the situation. Not so fast, Doctor. And that “whole-virus inactivated vaccine” scheme that is central to the “Next Generation Gold Standard?” The “Universal Vaccine?” Which, according to the “Next Generation Gold Standard” ethos, may be developed in Petri-dishes in federal government-based facilities only? And the PATENT for which “Universal Vaccine” is owned by the current Acting Director of NIAID, Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger? (https://www.techtransfer.nih.gov/tech/tab-3388)]

“We are continuing the Operation Warp Speed model of investing in technology with the most potential to help Americans.”

[YT: And, will this “continued” Operation Warp Speed model again be done in such a way that important information is deliberately withheld from President Trump47, as was the case with the original Operation Warp Speed in President Trump’s first term?]

“We will move forward with scientific rigor, transparency, and humility. At the NIH, we will fund promising research based not on hype, but on evidence. And I will continue to use my platform to communicate candidly in public conversations where debate and disagreement are welcomed.”

[YT: “Humility” is always a good thing. So is TRUTH.]

“We are entering a new era of public health, grounded not in wishful thinking or performative consensus, but in open inquiry and respect for the American people’s intelligence. The only to rebuild trust is to earn it — one honest conversation at a time.”

[YT: The “one honest conversation at a time” must include the honest admission by the NIH / NIAID / FDA / CDC, that the entire COVID-19 “vaccine” disaster could have been prevented through FDA approval of using re-purposed items to prevent or to treat COVID-19 infection: Ivermectin, Hydroxycholorquine, Doxycycline, Zinc and Vitamin D supplementation. There are plenty of peer-reviewed, published scientific papers which prove that these work. Instead, the FDA, TO THIS DAY, still refuses to approve the use of these items to prevent or to treat COVID-19. Can you explain why this is still the case, Dr. Bhattacharya?]

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 8.15.2025 Open Thread: Special Report Edition

The free header image for today’s offering is courtesy of Shutterstock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering is related, in part, to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons who have contracted injures, illnesses, or disabilities, induced or aggravated by the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their bodies; and, to the memory of all persons who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that were injected into their bodies.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except for perhaps AI-generated images in any of the linked URLs below. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

There are two sections to today’s Special Report offering: the first section, regarding the now-proven linkage of COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” to increases in cancer and in general mortality; the second section, regarding what appears to be the potential emergence of the “next plandemic” in Communist China. Please bear with Yours Truly: one does not want to “weary by recitals”, as the Duc de Saint-Simon once wrote — but there is a lot of information, multiple screenshots, and so on. The evolving knowledge regarding the disaster called COVID-19 (the virus itself, and the “vaccines”) is gaining speed with each passing day. This evolving knowledge base is important to understand in light of the developments regarding the new information about the “Chikungunya outbreak” currently in China, and which is apparently spreading to other countries (shades of the original COVID-19 virus itself outbreak in China.)

First section, the linkage between COVID-19 “booster vaccines” with increases in cancer and in general mortality. COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” means any injection of a “latest version” of a COVID-19 “vaccine.” This includes the FDA- approved 2025-2026 “new formula COVID-19 vaccine versions” of the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, COMIRNATY; of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX; and, of the Novavax COVID-19 “vaccine”, NUVAXOVID.

Yours Truly begins here: https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-oncologist-sounds-alarm-cancer-deaths-now-surging-among-covid-boosted/, “Renowned Oncologist Sounds Alarm: Cancer Deaths Are Now Surging Among Covid-Boosted”, by Frank Bergman, 6 August 2025. There is an embedded video statement by Prof. Dr. Angus Dalgleish (St. George’s, University of London.) Dr. Dalgleish warns, in no uncertain terms, that it is the suppression of T-cell immune cells in the body of the COVID-19 “vaccine boosted” that is causing the surge of cancer among these persons. Please see the screenshot from the Slay News article, below:

There is another study from Japan, which also confirms that repeated COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” cause increases in mortality. Please see: https://slaynews.com/news/official-japanese-data-confirms-covid-vaccines-caused-worsening-excess-death-surge/, by Frank Bergman, 1 August 2025 (the article title is the same as the URL.) Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

The paper referenced above is here: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6899448/v2, “Factors contributing to the sharp rise in excess mortality in Japan since 2021”, Atsushi Takahashi, 17 July 2025. This paper is a pre-print. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. They are: portions of the Results section; Figure 4; and, Figure 9:

The identifier names are those of the Prefectures in Japan that were studied. Even with taking other factors into consideration (examples: the size and population of the various Prefectures; the number of adults in age brackets in the Prefectures; whether or not a Prefecture was “rural” in character and location, as compared to “urban”), it is clear that the increase in mortality is tied to an increased amount of COVID-19 “vaccine boosters” that were administered.

There is a Commentary to this paper, to be seen here: https://jxiv.jst.go.jp/index.php/jxiv/preprint/view/1398/, “Commentary: Immune imprinting and spike protein toxicity — rethinking COVID-19 vaccinesty: rethinking COVID-19 vaccines”, Yasuhiko Kamikubo; Takahashi, Atsushi, 2025. This Commentary is in a mixture of English and Japanese. The English translation (no figures included) is here: https://jxiv.jst.go.jp/index.php/jxiv/preprint/view/1398/3679.

The above items confirm this article, written in July 2025: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/covid-boosters-correlate-worse-survival-rates-cancer-third-most-deaths, “COVID boosters correlate with worse survival rates for cancer with third-most deaths: study”, by Greg Piper, 9 July 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, which relates to a study in Japan regarding survival rates among COVID-19 “vaccine boosted” pancreatic cancer patients, below:

The peer-reviewed paper on the Japan study is here: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122006, “Repeated COVID-19 Vaccination as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study”, Makoto Abue, et al., 16 June 2025.

Yours Truly has written extensively for the board here regarding the damage / destruction of the natural immune system of the person who takes COVID-19 “vaccines.” These injectables were designed to attack, damage / destroy the CD4 – CD8 immune system cells. These injectables were designed to attack, damage / destroy the IgG3 immune system “fighter” cells, while at the same time, fostering the increase of IgG4 immune system “tolerate and never clear” cells. This damage / destruction increases with each injection of a modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, including injections of the “latest formula version” of said “vaccines”, which includes the “2025-2026 Formula versions” of said “vaccines” (COMIRNATY [Pfizer-BioNTech]; SPIKEVAX [Moderna]; and, NUVAXOVID [Novavax.])

The “Seneff and Nigh” paper of 10 May 2021 discusses how “immune system imprinting” in the the body of persons who take the COVID-19 “vaccines” have the potential to result in what the authors call “unintended consequences.” The paper is available here: https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF-1.PDF, “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”, Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh; International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 2(1), May 10, 2021, Page 38-79. Please see the screenshots from this article, below. They are: the Abstract; the “Unprecedented” box; and, Figure 2.

Further information regarding the “class switch” between IgG3 cells and IgG4 cells resulting from COVID-19 “vaccination” is here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-immunological-mechanism-of-action, “The immunological mechanism of action for lost immunity, a shift to tolerance (and autoimmunity?) from the shots”, by Jessica Rose, PhD, 22 December 2022. Please also see: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/04/04/health-friday-4-4-2025-open-thread-the-covid-19-vaccines-decimate-the-igg-immune-system-cells/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2024/12/06/health-friday-open-thread-12-6-2024-the-immune-system-after-covid-19-vaccination-and-a-note-on-the-virus-itself/.

Second section, regarding the potential for the “next plandemic” to come from Communist China. This has to do with the current emergence of mosquito-borne Chikungunya infections in several areas of China, which has resulted in various government-enforced measures. There is also an ** interesting connection ** to the United States involved in this situation.

What is Chikungunya? It is a virus transmitted by the bite of an infected female mosquito of (usually) the Aedes aegypti or the Aedes albopictus species. (As an aside: female mosquitos of these species can also transmit Dengue fever via bites.) The virus that is transmitted causes joint pain and fever; these can progress to severe. Most people infected with Chikungunya, however, make a full recovery. The virus is an RNA alphavirus. Please see: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/25083-chikungunya; there is a screenshot from this article, below:

Another source of information regarding Chikungunya is here: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chikungunya; please see the screenshot from this article, below:

Two recent articles regarding the Chikungunya outbreak in China: the first, here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-new-pending-plandemic-is-it-scheduled, “The new pending “plandemic” — is it scheduled for November?”, by Jessica Rose, PhD, 12 August 2025. Dr. Rose makes it clear that the “alphavirus + saRNA-LNP platform” (self-amplifying RNA + lipid nanoparticles “vaccine” platform) is based on the VEEV alphavirus (Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus.) Please see the screenshots from her article, below:

**** Note the mention of immune system issues that are induced in persons who are COVID-19 “vaccinated”, and how this can potentially severely complicate any infection by Chikungunya.

The second article is here: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/psyop-25-scamdemic-update-chinese, “PSYOP-25 SCAMDEMIC UPDATE: Chinese Authorities Mandating Blood Tests, Releasing Lab Mosquitoes to Fight Chikungunya Outbreak”, 13 August 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

The founder of the “mosquito lab” in Guangzhou is Dr. Zhiyong Xi. Please see the screenshot below from the above link:

Let’s look at Dr. Zhiyong Xi. https://archive.md/b5xWD:

He is still a professor at Michigan State University in the United States: https://directory.natsci.msu.edu/Directory/Profiles/Person/101715, “Zhiyong Xi”:

And here is a portion of the work that Dr. Zhiyong Xi is doing at Michigan State University, via https://scholars.msu.edu/scholar/8639/ZHIYONG_XI:

Which work, at least in part, is being funded by NIAID (division of NIH — both divisions part of HHS.)

Which begs the following questions: WHY is Dr. Zhiyong XI still doing mosquito research in the United States if he founded a mosquito study lab in Communist China? WHY is Dr. Zhiyong Xi’s research at Michigan State University being funded, at least in part, by the NIH / NIAID?

There are two “FDA-approved vaccines” against Chikungunya: IXCHIQ, and VIMKUNYA. BOTH of these “vaccines” were FDA-approved under “accelerated approval” methods. Please see the screenshots, below, from the Package Inserts for these injectables. First, from the Package Insert for IXCHIQ (https://ixchiqhcp.com/PI-new.pdf):

And, from the Package Insert for VIMKUNYA (https://bavariannordic.io/uploads/Vimkunya-pi.pdf):

Note the presence of Aluminum Hydroxide as an adjuvant in VIMKUNYA.

NOTE THAT THE “EXACT MECHANISM OF PROTECTION’ HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED FOR EITHER IXCHIQ OR FOR VIMKUNYA. In other words, the United States government (via the FDA) is fine with injecting people with these “vaccines” WITHOUT THE FDA KNOWING THE EXACT MECHANISMS OF PROTECTION FOR EITHER OF THEM. What are the “CHIKV-specific immune responses” that these injectables supposedly elicit?

And, by the way, both IXCHIQ and VIMKUNYA can be “shed” onto newborn children if the expectant mother is sick with a virus (this is called viremia) at the time of delivery. A pregnant female who takes either one of the above “vaccines” runs the risk of contracting “viral viremia.” Neither IXCHIQ, nor VIMKUNYA have had proper testing for potential effects on pregnant females, their fetuses, or their newborns (section 8.1 Pregnancy in either Package Insert.)

All of the above begs the following questions: Does HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., know about these Chikujgunya “vaccines”? Does he know that the FDA approved them under “accelerated approval” methods? Does he understand that the FDA does NOT know the “exact mechanism of protection” for either IXCHIQ or VIMKUNYA? Does Dr. Martin Makary (FDA Commissioner) know about this situation? Do either Sec. Kennedy, Jr., or Dr. Makary know that “career FDA types” in the CBER division signed the FDA Approval Letters for IXCHIQ (signed by R. Douglas Pratt, MD, 6 August 2025) and for VIMKUNYA (signed by David C. Kaslow, MD, 14 February 2025)?

Yours Truly will again emphasize that it is critically important for all persons, whether COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not, to follow some type of COVID-19 spike protein mitigation / prophylaxis protocol. It is also critically important that all persons, whether COVID-19 “vaccinated” or not, to do all they can to build and maintain their general health, and the health of their immune system, so as to be in the best shape possible.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 7.25.2025 Open Thread: More on the COVID-19 “Vaccines” and What They Do to the Human Brain

The header image of the pituitary gland and the influence it has on the human body is courtesy of https://www.123rf.com/ and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative, toxic effects of the the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had injected into their body.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note One: Yours Truly has checked today’s post for any AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, the only AI-generated content are images that may be embedded in certain of the linked items in today’s post. If readers wish to post any AI-generated content in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Note Two: the format of today’s offering will be a combination of “in-text” links, with other items having numerical identifiers such as would be used in a scientific research article or paper. Citations related to the numerical identifiers will be listed at the end of the post. Thank you.

Today’s offering regards more information on the negative effects that the COVID-19 “vaccines” have on the human brain. The trail begins here:

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: Because Of mRNA Vaccines, The Brains Of Billions Of People Are Not Working Anymore.

"The mRNA vaccines cause the destruction of brain cells. Obviously. And that is what we are now experiencing. We're seeing — I'm afraid to say BILLIONS OF PEOPLE — whose… pic.twitter.com/pvgpBRjsj7
— Camus (@newstart_2024) July 11, 2025

Recall that Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, a medical microbiologist who is involved with the Doctors for COVID Ethics organization (https://doctors4covidethics.org/), and who is a dual citizen of Thailand and of Germany, was put on trial in Germany for his anti-COVID-19 “vaccine” stance. The court returned a verdict of Not Guilty in May 2023. The prosecutor’s appeal of Dr. Bhakdi’s Not Guilty verdict, an appeal that was to go to court in February 2025, was postponed [1]. More on the story related to the tweet by Dr. Bhakdi is here: https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-microbiologist-mrna-vaccines-destroyed-brains-billions-people/, “Renowned Microbiologist: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ ‘Destroyed the Brains’ of ‘Billions of People'”, by Frank Bergman, 14 July 2025.

Yours Truly has written extensively on this board about some of the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” on the brain of the “vaccinated” person. These articles are found here: https://www.theqtree.com/2024/10/18/health-friday-10-18-2024-special-edition-effects-of-the-covid-19-vaccines-physical-and-neurological/; https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/08/health-friday-11-0-2024-open-thread-the-insidious-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2025/03/21/health-friday-3-21-2025-open-thread-more-on-the-n1-methylpseudouridine-in-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines/.

Today’s offering speaks to the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” on the human brain having to do with two small, but very important, glands located in the brain: the pituitary gland and the pineal gland.

The pituitary gland, a small, pea-shaped gland,is found in the human brain near the hypothalamus. The pituitary gland secretes several hormones that are important to various body functions. The pineal gland, another small gland, is found in the center area of the human brain. The pineal gland, among other functions, secretes melatonin, a hormone that is important for the body’s circadian rhythm and for proper sleep. The pituitary gland, the pineal gland, and the hypothalamus are components of the endocrine system of the human body. Please see the screenshots below: the first is about the pituitary gland [2]; the second is about the pineal gland [3]; and the third is from an article on the pineal gland that includes a discussion about the endocrine system [4]:

The ingredients (and, therefore, the mechanisms) of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, once injected into the body, quickly spread, via the dangerous lipid nanoparticles “rapid delivery system” compounds that are contained in these injectables, to every area of the human body, including to the brain. Yours Truly has written and posted about these lab-created compounds. They are: ALC-0159 and ALC-0315 in the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them); and, SM-102 in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them.) It is now known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” cross the Blood-Brain Barrier of the human body and do damage to the brain. Once inside the brain, these “vaccines” can, and do, induce multiple problems ranging from Central Nervous System damage, to stroke, to cognitive impairment, to Alzheimer’s disease, and more. The Ota, et al., 2025 paper demonstrates that the COVID-19 spike protein (the foundation ingredient of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”) enters the cerebral arteries [5]. Please see a screenshot from this paper, below:

The Roh, et al. paper, from 2024, demonstrates that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” can induce Alzheimer’s disease [6]. Please see a screenshot from the Abstract of this paper, below:

A compilation of articles regarding how the COVID-19 “vaccines” enter the human brain and induce damage is here: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/vaids-bombshell-the-covid-vaccine, “VAIDS BOMBSHELL: “The ‘Covid Vaccine’ is a CHEMICAL LOBOTOMY. A recent study of 558,017 Koreans found that the mRNA shots Increase the Risk of Cognitive Impairment +137.7% & Alzheimer’s disease +22.5”, 23 July 2025. There are numerous links in this article to previous posts in this Substack which discuss brain issues after COVID-19 “vaccination.” The Ota, et al., paper is also mentioned.

There is another aspect of the issue regarding how the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” enter into every area (and, therefore, into the cells of these areas) of the “vaccinated” human body. This is the fact that the PRRARSV gene code piece from the Pangolin MP789 coronavirus is present in BOTH the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (all of them.) This particular gene code piece has a 90%+ compatibility to the human genome code. In the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, PRRARSV functions as a “backdoor key” to facilitate entry into every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body. Both our host, Wolf Moon, and Yours Truly has written about this situation here, for examples: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/05/01/pfizer-and-moderna-vaccines-both-contain-prrarsv-key-to-the-cell-nucleus/; and, https://www.theqtree.com/2024/11/27/placeholder-open-thread-11-27-2024-prrarsv-part-2-pangolin-edition/.

Back to the pituitary gland and the pineal gland of the human brain. Dr. Michele Ross, PhD, discusses the four areas of the brain that are not specifically protected by the Blood-Brain Barrier. Please see a screenshot from her article [7], below:

The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” enter and damage the pituitary gland, one of the glands that is not specifically protected by the human Blood-Brain Barrier. The Taieb and Mounira paper from 2024 discusses this issue [8]. Two screenshots from their paper are below; the first is from the Abstract; the second is the Figure 2:

Another paper, by Verrienti, et al., from 2024, is a review of effects on the pituitary gland after COVID-19 “vaccination”[9]. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. The first is the Conclusions section; the second is the Figure 1.

************ And now, to what may appear to be a minor point, but actually is, in Yours Truly’s opinion, an important aspect of the types of damage that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” do to the pineal gland of the human brain: these injectables interfere with the ADAMTS3 enzyme (a protein), part of the adamalysin family of enzymes. The influences of the ADAMTS enzymes in the human body range from functions in the brain, to correct growth of the lymphatic vessels, and more. Please see the screenshot from the Wikipedia entry on ADAMTS [10], below:

One member of the ADAMTS family is ADAMTS3. This enzyme (protein) is involved with, among other functions, the proper regulating of the brain’s cortex (the cerebral cortex, the outer “covering” of the brain.) Please see the screenshot from the Wikipedia entry on ADAMTS3 [11], below:

Pay special attention to the mention of Reelin. This protein is essential to the lamination of the cerebral cortex (lamination of the cerebral cortex appears like “multiple folds.”) When Reelin is decreased during the human aging process, brain function is negatively affected. When Reelin is decreased at other times in the human lifespan, the result can be Schizophrenia and other neurological conditions. Please see the screenshot from the Sighild Lemarchant article of 2017 [12], below:

The Cleveland Clinic article on the cerebral cortex starts with the following [13]:

************ And here is the “tie-in” to the COVID-19 spike protein and the brain: the spike protein of this virus interferes with the functioning of ADAMTS3. The Seabra Rodrigues Dias, et al., 2022 paper discusses what COVID-19 does to disrupt the work of the ADAMTS enzymes in the body [14]. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below. The first is a portion of section 2.5 Adamalysin expression in COVID-19 patients; the second is the Table 2. of body areas and functions that ADAMTS3 influences:

************ It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that, since the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (and the COVID-19 virus itself) contain elements that accelerate the aging of the entire body, down to the mitochondrial level, they also accelerate aging of the Reelin function in the brain related to ADAMTS3. This accelerated aging of the Reelin function can “leave the door open” for the development of cognitive impairment, of dementia, of Alzheimer’s disease, and other neurological / psychological conditions. Please see: https://www.theqtree.com/2023/10/28/the-covid-19-virus-and-the-modrna-covid-19-vaccines-induce-accelerated-aging/.

Yours Truly will point out that, while the COVID-19 virus itself does not contain the lab-created compound N1-Methylpseudouridine, nor the dangerous lipid nanoparticles ALC-0159, ALC-0315, or SM-102 — the COVID-19 virus itself does contain the PRRARSV “backdoor key”, and it also appears to contain elements that interfere with ADAMTS enzymes (proteins) in the body, including ADAMTS3 and the function of the Reelin protein in the brain. In my opinion, these facts may contribute to the incidence of “Long COVID” in non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who contract an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, recover from it, but then can present with symptoms of “Long COVID.” This is aside from COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who can also present with symptoms of “Long COVID.” These “Long COVID” symptoms may present as neurological and/or psychological issues (either new-onset, or aggravation of previously-diagnosed conditions.)

TO CONCLUDE: It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” were designed to damage, to injure, and/or to destroy, the human body. This damage, injury, and/or destruction includes every organ and area of the body of a person who has taken any injection of modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” This damage, injury, and/or destruction begins the moment that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” is injected into the body. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain a lab-created compound, N1-Methylpseudouridine, that replaces the natural Uridine in the “vaccinated” person’s body with a “fake” Uridine combined with a type of methane. Natural Uridine plays crucial roles in multiple types of brain function, in mood regulation, and in the regulation of the “gut-brain axis” functions of the body. N1-Methylpseudouridine has no role in the body beyond replacing natural Uridine, thus weakening the “vaccinated” person’s body natural immune system against the other ingredients and mechanisms of the “vaccines.” The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain dangerous lab-created lipid nanoparticles, which quickly spread the ingredients (and, therefore, the mechanisms) of the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” throughout the body of the “vaccinated” person, including crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier and entering the brain. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” induce multiple types of damage and injury to the brain, including to the areas of the brain that are not specifically protected by the Blood-Brain Barrier, such as the pituitary gland and the pineal gland. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” contain elements that interfere with the important ADAMTS3 enzyme (protein) of the body; a protein that plays critical roles in multiple areas, including the proper regulation of the cerebral cortex covering of the brain. The spike protein in the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” interfere with the proper function of the Reelin protein in the brain as it relates to ADAMTS3. The modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” also contain the PRRARSV gene code piece from the Pangolin MP789 coronavirus; PRRARSV acts as a “backdoor key” that facilities the entry of the COVID-19 spike protein in the modRNA “vaccines” to enter the nucleus of every cell in the “vaccinated” person’s body. [The above are aside from the fact that the modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” also contain a SV40 cancer promoter gene code piece from the African Green Monkey.] The COVID-19 virus itself contains the PRRARSV gene code piece; and, it also appears to contain elements that interfere with the important ADAMTS3 enzyme of the body. In addition, there is the now-known phenomenon of COVID-19 “vaccine” spike protein “shedding” from “vaccinated” persons onto other persons, including onto non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. It is Yours Truly’s considered opinion that this “shedding” can also potentially result in negative neurological effects, among other negative effects, in non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons. Yours Truly is NOT advocating that non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons avoid all contact with persons who may be COVID-19 “vaccinated”: but, instead, to be following a prophylatic COVID-19 spike protein protocol. In addition, ALL persons who have ever taken a COVID-19 “vaccine”, and ALL non-COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons who have been infected with COVID-19 and recovered, ALSO need to be following a COVID-19 spike protein mitigation / reduction protocol.

************ Yours Truly will state the following: It is past time for all COVID-19 “vaccines” to be taken off the market, and to be completely removed from use; to have all COVID-19 “vaccines” completely removed from any and all “recommendation lists” issued by any government agency, any private or non-governmental agency or organization, any hospital, clinic, pharmacy, nursing home or care facility, and any school board or educational facility; to have all COVID-19 “vaccine” inventories that are used on human beings reduced to zero; to retain only those COVID-19 “vaccine” vials that will be used for complete analysis and data compilation regarding the exact ingredients in these injectables and the sources of these ingredients, with the resulting information and data analyses made public; and, to hold to full account those who created the COVID-19 virus itself and the COVID-19 “vaccines.”

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Citations:

[1] “Timeline: Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi Case”. https://doctors4covidethics.org/timeline-of-the-events/

[2] “Pituitary Gland: What It Is, Function & Anatomy”. Last reviewed on 04/04/2022/ https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/21459-pituitary-gland.

[3] “5 Functions of the Pineal Gland”. Neel Duggal, medically reviewed by Avi Varna, MD, MPH, AAHIVS, FAAFP. Updated December 20, 2022. https://www.healthline.com/health/pineal-gland-function.

[4] “Pineal gland”. Last reviewed on 06/22/2022. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/23334-pineal-gland.

[5] Ota N., Itani M., Aoki T., Sakurai A., Fujisawa T., Okada Y., Noda K., Arakawa Y., Tokuda S., Tanikawa R. Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemhorrhagic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination. J Clinical Neuroscience. Volume 136, June 2025 111223.

[6] Jae Hoon Roh, Inha Jung, Yunsun Suh, Min-Ho Kim, A potential asssociation between COVID-19 vaccination and development of Alzheimer’s disease, QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 117, Issue 10, October 2024, Pages 709-716, https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae103.

[7] “4 Parts of the Brain Not Protected by the Blood-Brain Barrier”, Michele Ross, Phd. n.d. https://drmicheleross.com/brain-not-protected-blood-barrier/.

[8] Taieb A, Mounira EE. Pilot Findings on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-Induced Pituitary Diseases: A Mini Review from Diagnosis to Pathophysiology. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 24; 10(12):2004. doi.10.3390/vaccines10122004. PMID: 36560413; PMCID: PMC9786744.

[9] Verrienti, M., Picciola, V., Ambrosio, M.R. et al. Pituitary and COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review. Pituitary 27, 970-985 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11102-024-01402-2.

[10] “ADAMTS”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADAMTS.

[11] “ADAMTS3”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADAMTS3.

[12] Relevance of the Proteolytic Processing of Reelin by ADAMTS-3 in Brain Functions. Sighild Lemarchant. Journal of Neuroscience 19 July 2017, 37 (29) 6814-6815; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1077-17.2017.

[13] “Cerebral Cortex”. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/23073-cerebral-cortex. Last reviewed on 05/23/2022.

[14] “Adamalysins in COVID-19 — Potential mechanisms behind exacerbating the disease” Ivo Ricardo de Seabra Rodrigues Dias, Zhijian Cao, Hang Fai Kwok. J Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. Vol. 150, June 2022, 112970.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 7.18.2025 Open Thread: Moderna, the FDA, and the NIH/NIAID

The header image for today’s post is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

The phrase to keep in mind when reading today’s post is: Follow the money.

Today’s post begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/fda-commits-grave-betrayal-fully, “FDA Commits Grave Betrayal: Fully Approves Deadly Genetic Injections for Infants”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 11 July 2025. There is an embedded video interview with Mr. Hulscher in this article. This article and interview regard the FDA “full approval” on 10 July 2025 of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, SPIKEVAX, to be used on infants and young children from age 6 months to 11 years old. A screenshot of a portion of the Table 2. from this article is below, showing the amounts of “loose” DNA in this “vaccine”:

The published scientific paper that is linked in the above Hulscher article is here: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/review-of-calls-for-market-removal-of-covid-19-vaccines-intensify-risks-far-outweigh-theoretical-benefits/, “Review: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits”, Nicolas Hulscher, Mary Bowden, Peter A. MCullough, 28 January 2025.

Yours Truly now turns to a crucial component of the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” situation: the “tied to the hip” relationship that this company has with the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), part of the NIH (National Institutes of Health.) Both the NIAID and the NIH are institutes of the federal government Department of Health and Human Services (HHS.) Katherine Watt, of Bailiwick News, has studied and written about the “coziness” between Big Pharma entities such as Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna with federal government agencies, such as the FDA. Please see: https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/why-pfizer-and-moderna-and-fda-are, “Why Pfizer and Moderna and FDA are working toward government authorization to inject babies and small children”, 23 March 2022. Ms. Watt includes a statement made by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in 2021, on this situation. Please see: https://wsau.com/2021/12/31/robert-f-kennedy-jr-explains-why-fauci-is-going-after-children/, by Meg Ellefson, 31 December 2021. A screenshot from the Bailiwick News article on this is below:

There are SEC filings and “Confidential Agreements” between Moderna, the FDA. and the NIAID, regarding the funding and development of mRNA “vaccines.” There are patent co-ownership and revenue-sharing agreements between Moderna and the NIAID. There is a Moderna – NIH Confidential Agreement that goes back to 2015.

The trail begins here: https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/moderna-make-milestone-payments-nih-covid-vaccine-2023-02-24/,”Moderna to make milestone payments to NIH for COVID vaccine”, 24 February 2023. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

By the way, milestone payments would include payments for items such as, developing the “latest version” of a COVID-19 modRNA “vaccine” — for examples: the Moderna (SPIKEVAX) “2025-2026 COVID-19 Formula Vaccine” that was just “recommended” by the ACIP committee of the CDC; and, the FDA “full approval” of SPIKEVAX being used on infants and young children age 6 months to 11 years old, which “full approval” was granted on 10 July 2025. It appears that Moderna had attempted to “modify” or “avoid” certain types of sharing agreements stipulations, royalty payments to the HHS (via the NIAID), and HHS – Moderna co-owned patents agreements; and, for which, the company was taken to court by the HHS. The decision was rendered against Moderna, with an order to make a multi-million dollar “catch-up payment” to HHS -NIAID.

Another aspect of the trail is here: https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/4533574-how-the-national-institutes-of-health-became-a-den-of-cronyism/, by Sen. Rand Paul, MD (R-KY), 15 March 2024. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

Now, to the 2015 “Confidential Agreements” between Moderna and the NIH. The document is found here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6935195-NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements/, November 2015. This document has numerous “amendments” and “additions” that go through the year 2018 — and, the last of which appears to “cover” all items related to COVID-19 “vaccines”. On page 16 of the document, with special attention to page 19, start the CRADA stipulations (Cooperative Research and Development Agreement stipulations between Moderna and the NIH.) The language here has numerous Proprietary Information redactions; however, it appears to be broad enough to cover the later co-ownership by Moderna and the NIH of the SPIKEVAX patents and their Expiry Dates (more on these below.)

Here are page 19 and a portion of page 20 of the NIH/NIAID and Moderna CRADA agreement, below:

Recall that the director of the NIAID in 2015 was Dr. Anthony Fauci; and, the director of the NIH in 2015 was Dr. Francis Collins.

The third part of the trail is here, the SEC filing that details the NIH – Moderna agreements to share COVID-19 “vaccine” development, patents, and royalty payments for use of said “vaccines”, is found here: https://www.sec.gov/ix?=docs/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000168285223000011/mrna-20221231.html, filed 31 December 2022.

Page 41 of this document names the “partners” that will be included in the agreements: DARPA; BARDA; and, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Page 43 of this document details the SPIKEVAX patents and Expiry Dates that will be co-owned by Moderna and the NIH. A screenshot of this page is below:

There is also a “vaccine mechanisms” series of sections in this agreement. A screenshot of one of these sections is below:

And, there is a section regarding the “Drug Design Studio” section of the SEC document. Please see the screenshot from this section, below:

On 7 July 2025, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., cancelled the 10 July meeting that was scheduled for the USPSTF committee of the HHS (United States Preventive Services Task Force committee.) If Sec. Kennedy, Jr., can do this, why can’t he do something to modify / rescind / cancel the NIH / NIAID – Moderna “Confidential Agreements”, the related royalty-sharing payments agreements, and the 31 December 2022 SEC filing? Is it because of the “SPIKEVAX Patents and Expiry Dates” agreement, the screenshot of which from the SEC filing is above, and which runs, in total, until 22 October 2041? Are his hands tied? “Inquiring minds want to know.”

FLASH ADDENDUM: Our good Gail Combs asked to have the following added to today’s offering, regarding the development of a new BLACK PLAGUE strain variation that was just done by scientist in Israel. Yours Truly is also adding another item related to other work developing BLACK PLAGUE strain variations.

ISRAELI scientists have just developed an mRNA-based BLACK PLAGUE (Yersinia Pestis, or Y. Pestis) vaccine, using a lab-modified gene and adding N1-Methylpseudouridine as the lipid nanoparticle “delivery system.” Please see: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/cp/168494356, “Israel Engineers Mutant Plague — Puts Its Genes in mRNA Shot That Makes Human Cells Produce Virulence and Immune-Evasion ‘Black Death’ Proteins: Journal ‘Advanced Science'”, 16 July 2025. This is the “BLACK PLAGUE version” of the modRNA + N1-Methylpseudouridine COVID-19 “vaccines” — except that the “payload” is a lab-created genetically altered and more virulent version of the BLACK PLAGUE.

Recall that Yours Truly has written extensively about the mechanism of the N1-Methylpseudouridine used in the Pfizer-BioNTech and in the Moderna modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (there’s the connection to Moderna.) This lab-created compound ingredient replaces the natural Uridine in the COVID-19 “vaccinated” person’s body, kicking the door wide open for catastrophic immune system evasion by said “vaccine”: evasion that will occur throughout the body and also the brain. The connection to both Moderna and to Pfizer-BioNTech in regards the use of N1-Methylpseudouridine is that BOTH companies specifically included this lab-created chemical compound in their modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”, the description of which inclusion IS IN THE PATENT DOCUMENTS THAT WERE FILED BY EACH COMPANY. This begs the question: Did the Israeli scientists pay either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna for the “rights” to use this compound IN THEIR BLACK PLAGUE VARIATION “VACCINE” EXPERIMENTS?

The peer-reviewed paper that is referred to in the Jon Fleetwood article is here: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202501286, “Novel Bivalent mRNA-LNP Vaccine for Highly Effective Protection Against Pneumonic Plague”, Dan Peer, et al., 25 April 2025. A screenshot from the Fleetwood article is below:

But wait, there’s more! The Fleetwood article links to a paper published in 2024 regarding research by the United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center in Gunpowder, Maryland, ALSO on lab-creating a variation of the BLACK PLAGUE. This variation was “cultured” in a “bath” of Escherichia coli (E. coli, the same type of “culturing material” that is used by both Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna to produce their respective modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines.” The paper is here: https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000723.v3, “Towards a Yersinia Pestis lipid A recreated in an Escherichia coli scaffold genome”, Nathan D. McDonald, Erin E. Antoshak, 17 July 2024. A screenshot of the Abstract of this paper is below:

In Yours Truly’s opinion: The entire “let’s make a lab-created RNA + lipid nanoparticle vaccine” situation is out of control. The entire “let’s alter a gene or two from a deadly infectious disease and make a variation of this disease” situation is out of control.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Health Friday 7.11.2025 Open Thread: Establishment Medicine Declares War on HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

The above free image of physicians conferring is courtesy of LovePik and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks to the disaster of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, Yours Truly dedicates it to all those persons, of whatever age or location, who have come down with “vaccine”-induced injuries, illnesses, or disabilities, as a result of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (Bioweapon Toxin Injections) that they had put into their bodies; and, also, to all those persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” that they had put into their bodies.

Yours Truly has written extensively on this board regarding what she calls Establishment Medicine. Establishment Medicine can be found in multiple areas, among them: The teaching of “consensus-centered” medicine (otherwise known as “the science is settled” medicine) in medical schools (this appears to be the approach in medical education currently); the “suggestion” or “advice” that physicians who choose a specialty in which to practice (for example, Internal Medicine) “need” to become board-credentialed by a private medical credentialing board (for example, credentialing through ABIM (the American Board of Internal Medicine, https://www.abim.org/); physician membership in the American Medical Association https://www.ama-assn.org/; and, “adherence” to the “recommendations” of the “routine vaccination schedules” of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/); and, the “endorsed vaccination schedule” of the American Academy of Pediatrics (https://www.aap.org/); the “routine guidance” of the FDA (Food and Drug Administration, https://www.fda.gov/); and, the “rules” and “regulations” of the State Medical Licensing Board in the state in which the physician resides, and which physician’s License to Practice Medicine must be secured prior to starting medical practice, and which License must be renewed after a certain period of time). Yours Truly will make it clear at the outset that there are many caring, perceptive physicians — in hospitals, in medical clinics, in stand-alone private physicians’ offices, and so on — who likely do not blindly ascribe to the “diktats” of Establishment Medicine. Perhaps there are physicians among this number who understand that the COVID-19 “vaccines” are dangerous and deadly. Perhaps there are physicians among this number who observing that their COVID-19 “vaccinated” loved ones, patients, or colleagues are presenting with COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced injuries, etc. Perhaps there are physicians among this number who would prefer to speak the truth about the COVID-19 “vaccines”, but refrain, due to concerns that they could be “disciplined”, or lose their License to Practice Medicine, by their state Medical Licensing Board.

Until very recently, all was going well for Establishment Medicine — its control over the health of the American public was “unchallengeable” — then, two important things happened: One, that the American public in general began to realize the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, Two, the confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., as the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) of the new administration under the forty-seventh President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, a few months ago.

On 9 June 2025, the seventeen then-current members of the CDC’s ACIP committee (Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices) were fired by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-restores-public-trust-vaccines-acip.html, “HHS Takes Bold Step to Restore Public Trust in Vaccines by Reconstituting ACIP”, 9 June 2025.) Please see the screenshot from this announcement, below:

The reason? — Corruption of the ACIP committee members. The United States Congress reported on this corruption back in 2000: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/decades-of-corruption-congressional, “DECADES OF CORRUPTION: Congressional Report Confirms CDC’s ACIP Has Been Compromised Since the 1990s”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 10 June 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below:

One of the most-compromised (now former) members of the ACIP committee was Dr. Paul Offit.

And, of course, there was a large outcry from all over Establishment Medicine. One example: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rfk-jr-removes-members-cdc-immunization-advisory-committee-acip/, “RFK Jr. removes every member of CDC vaccine advisory committee”, 10 June 2025. Please see the screenshot from this article, below, and keep it in mind for later on regarding today’s offering:

The ACIP Adult Immunization Schedule that was issued in May 2025 is found here (the actual CDC website no longer lists this schedule): https://www.dph.ncdhhs.gov/news/press-releases/2025/06/03/cdc-updates-covid-19-vaccine-schedule. The ACIP Adult Immunization Schedule that was issued in May 2025 has several changes; among them, the previous CDC “recommendation” that all pregnant women get COVID-19 “vaccinated.” The May 2025 schedule, instead, encourages “shared clinical decisions” between the physician and the pregnant patient. And this is where “the rest of the story” begins.

The outcry against the immunization schedule changes by Establishment Medicine was instant, loud, and immense. For example, this: https://www.pharmacist.com/APhA-Press-Releases/apha-withholds-enforsement-of-acip-adult-immunization-schedule. Please see a screenshot from this article, below:

Then, on 9 June 2025, when HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., fired the seventeen then-current ACIP members, he replaced them with eight new members: Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, MD, ABNP, CAPT USPHS (Ret.); Martin Kullorff, PhD; Retself Levi, PhD; Robert W. Malone, MD; Cody Meissner, MD; James Pagano, MD, FACEP; Vicky Pebsworth, PhD, RN; and, Michael Ross, MD. Their biographies are here: https://www.cdc.gov/acip/membership/roster.html. (Dr. Ross withdrew from the ACIP committee due to “financial holdings” reasons.) Establishment Medicine countered with hue and cry that none of these medical professionals were “experienced in vaccines”, and so on.

The June ACIP meeting was held on 25-27 June 2025, with the now-seven new members in attendance. Even while the meeting was going on, Establishment Medicine was “sounding the alarm” over the new committee and what they would do. Please see: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/adult-non-flu-vaccines/vaccine-public-health-advocates-warn-fallout-acip-meeting, “Vaccine, public health advocates warn of fallout from ACIP meeting”, by Chris Dall, MA, 27 June 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued this statement: https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/32529/AAP-will-continue-to-publish-its-own-vaccine, “AAP will continue to publish its own vaccine recommendations after CDC advisers sow distrust”, by Melissa Jenco, 26 June 2025. Please the screenshot from this article, below:

Keep the above statement from the AAP in mind, as it is pertinent what happened in early July 2025. It appears that, while Establishment Medicine was making statements about how they opposed the new ACIP members, the new ACIP vaccine schedules and the new CDC policies, they were also making behind-the-scenes preparations for suing HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr. And, in fact, this is what occurred: on 2 July 2025, several Establishment Medicine groups filed suit against HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to force HHS to reinstate the former ACIP recommended vaccine schedules: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-medical-cartel-sues-rfk, “BREAKING: Medical Cartel Sues RFK Jr. for Pulling COVID Shot Recommendations for Kids and Pregnant Women”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 7 July 2025. Please see the screenshots from this article, below:

Note: The blue hyperlinks in the Hulscher article (one needs to go The Focal Points website for the Hulscher article link) lead to scientific articles about the dangers of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, and to the AAP, et al., lawsuit against Secretary Kennedy, Jr.

The AAP statement regarding the lawsuit, here, https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/32580, “AAP suing HHS over vaccine policy”, 7 July 2025, also has the link to the filed lawsuit against Secretary Kennedy, Jr. Please see the screenshot below from the AAP statement:

Screenshots of portions of the forty-two page lawsuit document are below:

Another link to the entire lawsuit document is here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25992348-aap-et-al-v-rfk-et-al-filed-complaint/.

In other words, in Yours Truly’s opinion, the AAP and the other medical organizations listed in the screenshot above want to force Secretary Kennedy, Jr., to “go back to the good old days” of the “old ACIP and the old CDC” — the same entities that “recommended” the dangerous, deadly COVID-19 “vaccines” without first demanding complete, detailed, and analyzed data from “clinical trials” for these injectables. Back to the “good old days” when every state legislature, every pharmacy, every medical clinic, every hospital, and almost every licensed physician, blindly followed the CDC “recommendations” regarding vaccinations of children and of adults. Back to the “good old days” of “the science is settled” — and those physicians who boldly told the truth, and continue to tell the truth, about the dangers and deadliness of the COVID-19 “vaccines” (for example, Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD; Dr. Ryan Cole, MD; Dr. Pierre Kory, MD; Dr. Charles Hoffe, MD; and, Dr. Robert Malone, MD) were belittled; were marginalized by their medical specialty organizations; were fired from their jobs; were prosecuted by their Medical Specialty licensing organizations; were prosecuted by their state Medical Licensing Boards — were “disciplined” by these Boards, or had their License to Practice Medicine “restricted”, or even revoked, by these Boards. Back to the “good old days” when Establishment Medicine was the sole arbiter of health in the United States.

In Yours Truly’s opinion, the lawsuit by Establishment Medicine against HHS Secretary Kennedy, Jr., is the culmination of months of negative reactions regarding his nomination as the new HHS Secretary; regarding his confirmation for the position; regarding what appear to be some ambiguous and/or conflicting statements he has made since his confirmation; and certainly regarding his actions as HHS Secretary to attempt to rein in the tyranny of Establishment Medicine in HHS decisions. In some ways, the AAP, et al., lawsuit against Sec. Kennedy, Jr., may be similar to liberal “Judicial Establishment” actions against President Donald Trump 47 regarding blocking his efforts to deport illegal aliens in the United States.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA