Elections, Voter ID And More Q

Here are the latest posts. Please go easy on a girl in a hurry.

(OK! Adding images and the next drop! -W)

OK – I see what’s up. 2690 is largely a repeat of 2689, with an added image.

I’ll do 2689 first as a “quote”, and then let the 2690 be images.

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 82893e No.5123210 
Feb 11 2019 12:50:22 (EST)
VoterFraud.jpg
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: ‘Foreign’
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by ‘Non-Cit’ data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) – vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D’s push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D’s push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428
What (FALSE) ‘narrative’ is pushed by D’s re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D’s?
Does the argument ‘A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote’ suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent ‘minorities’ from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html
Why do D’s want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q

Q Post 2689

Here 2689 is again as mostly TEXT.

2689

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 82893e No.5123210
Feb 11 2019 12:50:22 (EST)

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: ‘Foreign’
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by ‘Non-Cit’ data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) – vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D’s push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D’s push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428
What (FALSE) ‘narrative’ is pushed by D’s re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D’s?
Does the argument ‘A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote’ suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent ‘minorities’ from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html
Why do D’s want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q

2690

It is the above post with this graphic below:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 15e248 No.5126726 
Feb 11 2019 17:00:54 (EST)
If [AS] has seen ‘evidence’ of collusion and/or POTUS/RUSSIA illegal activities, as he’s stated in the past many times across all D-arm media networks, why then is there a need to open ‘new’ investigations?
What about the so-called ‘evidence’ already seen?
How is [AS] making open statements re: MUELLER not investigating POTUS/Deutsche Bank thorough enough if the MUELLER investigation itself is CLASSIFIED?
How does [AS] know what MUELLER has/hasn’t investigated?
FAKE NEWS DESIGNED TO KEEP THE FAKE NARRATIVE IN PLAY [COVER].
You are witnessing the greatest ‘DISINFORMATION’ campaign to ever be pushed by a political party.
Ask yourself, why?
FEAR of what?
The message must be direct.
The WAR is very real.
Q

Q Post 2691

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 306030 No.5127210 
Feb 11 2019 17:29:04 (EST)
Dd5W7hEVQAA8oJO.jpg
DjuLvI1VsAItD5H.jpg
DjsnjmeW0AAGXPH.jpg
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-fbi-general-counsel-talked-to-hillary-clintons-lawyer-about-comeys-letter-on-weiner-laptop-clinton-emails/
Baker’s heads up on the Kendall call was sent to:
Then-Director James Comey; since fired;
Then-Associate Deputy Director David Bowdich, who later replaced Andrew McCabe as deputy director;
Michael Steinbach, the F.B.I.’s former executive assistant director for national security;
Then-Assistant Director of Counterintelligence E.W. Priestap, now retired;
James Rybicki, former chief of staff to Comey;
FBI intelligence analyst Jonathan Moffa;
Former Acting Assistant Director Jason V. Herring;
Michael Kortan, FBI assistant director for public affairs, now retired;
Former principal deputy general counsel Trisha Anderson;
Strzok and Page
Does the list above look familiar?
Re_read drops re: FBI ‘Midyear’ OIG ……. & review graphics.
Q

Q Post 2692

Images from 2692:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 306030 No.5127462 
Feb 11 2019 17:44:56 (EST)
https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1095051195658522625
Let’s actually use ‘FACTS’:
Step One: Hype an invented threat of POTUS working w/ the RUSSIANS (disinformation campaign).
Step Two: Send FBI/DOJ/CONGRESS/SENATE/C_A/NSA/INTEL/FVEY/etc… to address and investigate the IMAGINARY THREAT.
Step Three: Justify the ‘SPECIAL COUNSEL’ and MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS SPENT as necessary to protect the public and our election process against an imaginary, made-up, non-existent threat (which really is) designed to protect the illegal activities of many elected officials.
Step Four: Open ‘new’ Fake & False investigations as CHAIRMAN of the House Intel Comm to retain disinformation campaign designed to keep liberal/D Americans onboard to regain POWER & PREVENT prosecution – Executive Time!
Q

Q Post 2693

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 306030 No.5127652 
Feb 11 2019 17:53:54 (EST)
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 306030 No.5127462 
Feb 11 2019 17:44:56 (EST)
https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1095051195658522625
Let’s actually use ‘FACTS’:
Step One: Hype an invented threat of POTUS working w/ the RUSSIANS (disinformation campaign).
Step Two: Send FBI/DOJ/CONGRESS/SENATE/C_A/NSA/INTEL/FVEY/etc… to address and investigate the IMAGINARY THREAT.
Step Three: Justify the ‘SPECIAL COUNSEL’ and MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS SPENT as necessary to protect the public and our election process against an imaginary, made-up, non-existent threat (which really is) designed to protect the illegal activities of many elected officials.
Step Four: Open ‘new’ Fake & False investigations as CHAIRMAN of the House Intel Comm to retain disinformation campaign designed to keep liberal/D Americans onboard to regain POWER & PREVENT prosecution – Executive Time!
Q

>>5127462

Life Lesson – [AS]
The next time you ‘leak’ classified information, don’t have your phone (or allow phones of the ‘unknown’ go-between ‘students’) present.
FISA works both ways.
Q

Q Post 2694

A WEB OF COMMIES, STORIES, and LIES; PERCY SUTTON, HIS FAMILY, and even MARY JACOBY! PART FOUR

This is Part Four of a much longer post I put up a bit ago. It was long, so I broke it up.
Part Four of the story starts out with G. J. Sutton, one of the most politically active (and radical) Suttons. It continues with some of the other siblings.
For those gluttons for punishment who want the whole eighteen pages as one lump:
https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/02/06/2591/
Here are the previous parts if you haven’t read them yet:
Part One:
https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/02/08/a-web-of-commies-and-lies-percy-sutton-his-family-and-even-mary-jacoby-part-one/
Part Two:
https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/02/09/a-web-of-commies-stories-and-lies-percy-sutton-his-family-and-even-mary-jacoby-part-two/
Part Three:
https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/02/10/a-web-of-commies-stories-and-lies-percy-sutton-his-family-and-even-mary-jacoby-part-three/
– G. J. (Garlington Jerome) H. Sutton, b. abt. 1909, d. 22 June 1976; m. 1st Jeffrey Plummer on 18 May 1933;  m. 2nd Lou Nelle Callahan, b. 20 Dec 1905; attended Wilberforce University
At a Free Angela Davis (black activist) meeting in 1971:
“Seated on the platform were Carlos Richardson, Texas co-ordinator of Student Nonviolent Co-ordinating Committee and chairman of the San Antonio Committee to Free Angela Davis; Raul Rodriguez, publisher of Chicano Times, and Rosie Castro, both candidates for City Council; G.J. Sutton and John Inman, black community leaders; John Stanford, Communist party spokesman; Mario Cantu, Chicano businessman; Mrs. Manuela Sager, and David Plylar.
https://keywiki.org/G.J._Sutton
John Sanford is the man who stated that the SIX SUTTONS were communists. John Inman, Manuela Sager, and Percy Sutton were the others he named in the same speech.
John Inman was a known revolutionary in San Antonio. A.C. Sutton was quoted as saying “Anything that looked like a movement, he would be a part of.” He was deeply connected to the Sutton family and Emma Tenayuca.
John Inman was a fighter for social justice for many years, John Inman, a black revolutionary during the Bellinger era, lived for a long time and fought for positive change for decades. He was socialist oriented and was able to establish strong working relations with the Mexican American community through Emma Tenayuca as they both fought for worker’s rights. John Inman was allied with Rev. Claude Black and the Sutton family, who were at various times connected to the socialist movement.”
http://www.saobserver.com/single-post/2018/04/17/CIVIL-RIGHTS-LEADER
Emma Tenayuca was married to Homer Brooks aka Homer Bartchy, born 28 Dec 1910, a Communist Party USA Gubernatorial candidate in Texas in the 1930s. They ultimately separated, and in 1946, Emma left the Communist Party. She became a teacher. Too many of these people are educators.
I found a very interesting quote about G. J. Sutton made in an oral interview by Maury Maverick. Maverick was a San Antonio politician. He represented Texas in the House of Representatives from 1935 to 1939, and was mayor of San Antonio from 1939 to 1941. This is an excerpt of the interview with Chandler Davidson:
CHANDLER DAVIDSON:
Well, tell me a little bit about the black population in San Antonio. That’s a rather small one compared to the Chicanos, isn’t it?
MAURY MAVERICK:
Yes. And they are all working for the Pentagon, too, but like blacks everywhere in the South, they are damn well organized and they know what they are doing and they’ve got a black representative from here, a better fellow than that liberal Texas Monthly magazine gives him credit for being. He is a lot better fellow.
CHANDLER DAVIDSON:
This is Sutton that you are talking about?
MAURY MAVERICK:
Yeah, G. J. Sutton, which may probably be the most interesting black family in Texas and it’s worth telling one of your students, if you’ve got one from San Antonio, to do a story on that family. One of them was a scientist in the Soviet Union and designed a hemp rope of some kind that was of great use to the Russians. He speaks Russian fluently. One of the girls was a medical doctor, one of the first black women to be a doctor in America. One of them is Percy Sutton, the president of the borough of Manhattan and may be the first black mayor of New York City. He was raised on a farm and he was up making a speech in upstate New York to a bunch of farmers and they said, “This Harlem black, what’s he going to know about agriculture?” Well, he got up and talked about crows and insects and locusts and boll weevils and they never had heard anything like that in their lives. He was raised on a farm. The reason that he is borough president of New York, Manhattan, today is that after World War II he applied to go to Texas A&M’s veterinary medicine school, he loved animals, and they wouldn’t let him in. They said that he had to go to the black school. He said, “I’m not going to go to any black school.” For that reason, he went to New York and I tell Percy that Texas lost a good horse doctor.
“They’re all working for the Pentagon”? What the heck is THAT about?
Maury Maverick was branded as a communist by his political opponents, which led to his defeat in 1941.
G.J. Sutton married second Lou Nelle Callahan. After his death, Lou Nelle ran for his place in the Texas Legislature, and won. She is another example of the mythology this family used to disguise its humble origins. On the 1930 census in San Angelo, Texas, Lou Nelle is listed as a single servant in the household of Preston Northrup. In an oral interview, Lou Nelle spoke of when she later moved to Austin.
“I lived in Austin, but I lived with a family. I didn’t…There was one family…there was a family, Reverend and Mrs. Duncan and their daughter, Thelma, and a son, Roosevelt. Thelma and I were very near the same age. We met in the church when I first went there, and we became friends. Before too long, I moved out of the dormitory and moved into the home with the Duncans. And that’s where I did…I spent the rest of my schooling.
Lou Nelle goes on to emphasize that she was treated “Just like Thelma.” I found the family on a census, probably before Lou Nelle lived with them. Thelma was actually four years younger than she. I am fairly certain that the sentence in bold above should read “And that’s where I did for them.” That is the “polite” way Southerners referred to servitude. I think it is likely Lou Nelle was a servant for this black family while she was in school. She “helped” the mother with her sewing for spending money, she states. There is more in the interview, reading between the lines, that supports this theory. But it wouldn’t suit the narrative she was living, as the woman who took her husband’s place in the Texas legislature, if she had ever been a servant.
I keep mentioning these seemingly innocent lies because they strongly remind me of the made-up and covered-up past of Barack Obama. It is clear that deceit about one’s true origins is not an exceptional thing within this group. Percy Sutton was probably easily persuaded to write a letter supporting the admission of a possibly non-deserving student to Harvard Law. He was definitely accustomed to making stuff up!
Another very telling section of this interview involves Lou Nelle’s decision to run for G.J.’s seat. Her brother-in-law Oliver approached her, telling her she would have to run for the seat on the day he died. Here is a widow, in shock, and the pressure starts on the day of his death. His nephew Charles, sister Smithie’s son, also approached her about running the very next day. These people are all about power, and this demonstrates it fully to me.
G.J. Sutton operated Sutton and Sutton Mortuary with his brother, Samuel. After G.J.’s death, it passed to Lou Nelle. She bristled at people calling it the “family business,” stating it was “her business.” She actually went off the record with the interviewed to explain how $200 was what the family contributed. Most sources talk about the owners of the business as G.J. and his brother. According to an oral interview with activist Harry Burns, a good friend of G. J. Sutton and Rev. C. W. Black, the funeral home was an “internal family feud.” Lillian opened a different funeral home in San Antonio. Maybe the family loaned her the $200 to start her business.
Harry Burns also states that he and G. J. often came into conflict, because G. J. was more “militant” in his views and how he wanted to do things.
http://digital.utsa.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15125coll4/id/439
http://digital.utsa.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15125coll4/id/248
Rev. C. W. Black, Jr. made a tribute to G. J. at his funeral. G. J. and Rev. Black were very good friends. Both were very radical in the politics of 1950s and 60s San Antonio.
– William N. Sutton, b. 8 Feb 1910, d. 28 Aug 1971; attended Hampton Institute
William N. Sutton seems to be one of the lesser-known of the Sutton family. In the funeral program for Rev. Alexander Carver Sutton, it is stated that William N. Sutton joined A. Philip Randolph as a union organizer for the United Brotherhood of Pullman Porters (this is actually not the correct name of the union; it is Sleeping Car Porters). Randolph was the editor of the Messenger, and was named in an investigation of communist propaganda by Congress in 1930. The newspaper “advocated communism, the overthrow of the United States,” and a variety of other “crimes.”
https://books.google.com/books?id=u9FFAQAAMAAJ&pg=RA2-PA81&lpg=RA2-PA81&dq=Howard+Kester+Communist&source=bl&ots=S3HqVZJDTD&sig=ACfU3U3VivG7PztWxcL0uGNgEK2BPcb9_w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiy-82Ju4fgAhWQEnwKHVFPDK0Q6AEwBnoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=Howard%20Kester%20Communist&f=false
Interestingly, while looking for William Sutton in relation to this union, I found that Rev. C. W. Black, Jr., who officiated at so many of the Sutton funerals, was born the son of local Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters vice president Claude Black, Sr. The Sleeping Car Porters Union was formed by A. Philip Randolph in 1925, when William Sutton would have been only fifteen years old. By 1933, the Union would only have 658 members and had stopped paying its bills. William Sutton would then have been twenty-three. Maybe being a porter was his first job. In any case, perhaps this is when the family first came into contact with Rev. Black.
William N. Sutton most certainly had some sort of relationship with men whom the Congress at the time believed were communists.
– Cora Mary Sutton, b. 9 Dec 1911, d. 22 Nov 2005; m. Granville Andrew Jackson; attended Guadalupe College
Cora Sutton Jackson became a teacher. She eventually taught in Oakland, California. According to the Sutton family, she was head of an educational department in the Oakland Public Schools.
Her husband Grandvel seems to have been fairly undistinguished. He completed college, according to census information, but at age 30 was working as a waiter in a “private club.” His father was a farmer.
In this obituary, it is stated that she and Grandvel became “surrogate parents” to their nieces and nephews who came to California to live with them. The obit didn’t specify which ones, but Jeffrey Dean (Sutton) Greene, G. J.’s daughter is quoted in the obit. His children were also referenced as being raised by Lillian Sutton Taylor, so I imagine they were some of the “nieces and nephews” mentioned here. Some of these people sure seem to have had a hard time raising their kids or staying married.
There is not much other information available about Cora. She seems to have been fairly unremarkable.
– Smithie D. Sutton, b. 4 Oct 1914, d. 5 Oct 1982, Marin Co., CA ; m. 1st Charles C. Andrews; m. 2nd Wendell Henry 29 Jan 1966 in San Francisco, CA
Smithie, along with Lillian, was an activist in the civil rights movement. They picketed Joske Department Store leading to the integration of its Chameleon Room in 1960.
Smithie seems to have been fairly political. She was active in the League of Women voters, the Democrat Party and the NAACP. She was also very involved in children’s organizations, including the Girl Scouts. I could not find any obvious Communist connections. Doesn’t mean they aren’t there, they are just well hidden if they are.
The ubiquitous Rev. C. W. Black, Jr. also spoke at her funeral.
Coming up, the rest of the story.

Did Our New Billionaires Earn Their Wealth, or Were They Merely Lucky?

Short post here, on my part. Hopefully, it will lead to open discussion from a well-informed group of people who are smarter than I am.
I had a conversation with a “Person A” this weekend who was resentful of several specific Silicon Valley billionaires and their overnight wealth. “Person B” brought up the Carnegies and Vanderbilts of old, but there was no resentment for the older wealthy families. I wondered why there was hatred for the nouveau riche but not the blue-bloods.
I thought, maybe, the passage of time has softened the images of the Carnegies, Vanderbilt’s and others, but “Person A” was quick to disagree. Person A said (paraphrasing), “No, that’s not it at all. The new billionaires earn their money quickly, either by stealing an idea or by taking a good idea public, and overnight – poof – they’re rich. They then think they can rule our country and buy respect. The older families acquired wealth over decades, generations, and improved their communities along the way. They also saved their wealth for the next generation. They had a sense of responsibility. Perhaps, they did ‘rule’ the country or influence politics, but they understood their position in society”.
Hmmm, I thought. My mind ran through examples of poor work conditions under Carnegies, etc., but also to universities and hospitals named in their honor. Likewise, we can point to a Bill Gates, who does benevolent work overseas and domestically.
To bolster the perception of Person A, we can also point to “lucky” billionaires, or the thieves, as they are perceived. We all remember the movie about Zuckerberg stealing the idea of Facebook from the Harvard twins. Jack Dorsey floundered and failed as a human being and sort of fell into the idea of Twitter. One could make the argument the ideas were stolen, just ask a dead Steve Jobs.
OR, is it that our world has experience a tech revolution and some people were on the inside, and we are resentful because we were not in the right place at the right time. OR are we resentful at all? Or are we merely disgusted with nouveau riche behavior? Like the Kardashians?
Interesting note: Person A was a liberal. Yet, Person A was not resentful of the wealth of Donald Trump or a man like Carl Icahn. In the view of Person A, even Donald Trump EARNED his money over a lifetime, “He worked for it and he deserves it – he built buildings all over the world”. Yet, there was still resentment for billionaires like Zuckerberg, Bezos, and Dorsey… and the Kardashians. The resentment went beyond personal politics. Interesting, eh?
Soooooo, here’s the question. Is the resentment of newly rich billionaires a broad feeling in America, AND is this ‘feeling’ feeding the push towards higher taxes on the wealthy and a general call for socialism. Are the new billionaires acting responsibly with their wealth? Do we believe the new billionaires are so irresponsible, we (or some Americans) think we should take their money away? Are the new billionaires cheaters (thieves) or did they just cheat the idea of “a lifetime of hard word is our reward”. Do we, as Americans, resent the Chinese billionaires because they cheated America…. because our politicians allowed it to happen?
Is the feeling of unfairness a call for socialism, or is it a BIGGER call for a return to fairness? It’s a big question. If the masses are being sold “socialism” as a society which is more fair (and that’s definitely what Dem presidential candidates are selling = resentment of the rich and a return to normalcy)………. then, all we have to do is sell “fairness”, with a return to justice, crime does not pay (Facebook is fined for stealing data – or China is penalized – or Hillary is indicted), and ethical hard work is rewarded.
What do you think?
 

Abortion War Is Really Out Of This World: Argument For It Being A Battle In The Spiritual Realm

This appears in the February 11, 2019 Daily Thread comments, and is reposted here with a few edits at the request of the site host.
Something popped into my FB feed this morning that is, IMO, related to the anon’s post 2686:
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 994a42 No.5114108
Feb 10 2019 20:24:09 (EST)
https://www.liveaction.org/what-we-do/investigations/child-sex-trafficking-cover-up/
Why do D’s push to fund [PP] using taxpayer dollars ($500m/year)?
Where does the money go?
Past political donations of [PP]?
What is the process of disposal re: aborted fetus?
What regulations (who monitors) are in place to ensure that process is being followed?
Why is there a new push by D’s to legalize late term abortions?
See past drops re: [PP] re: Congressional report (WARNING: GRAPHIC)
This has nothing to do w/ a woman’s right to choose (tactic they deploy when challenged to activate liberals/media hysteria).
The focus is on the organization itself.
https://www.crainsnewyork.com/awards/kirk-adams-cecile-richards
Ask yourself a very simple question:
Given the amount of evidence demonstrating illegal & disturbing activities by [PP]- where is the FBI investigation?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/planned-parenthood-under-investigation-by-justice-department-over-sale-of-fetal-tissue
[RR][MCCABE]
What senior political officials are providing cover to [PP]?
Will action be taken by DOJ/FBI?
2019?
Q
So, here we see the taxpayer money laundering that finances Dem election campaigns, and the sale of baby body parts as exposed a few years back.
What we don’t see, IMO, is the real battle: Good vs. Evil, and I am talking at a supernatural level and it has to do with this line from the post reprinted above:

“What is the process of disposal re: aborted fetus?
What regulations (who monitors) are in place to ensure that process is being followed?”

And that’s where today’s confluence of items coming together is a little spooky, truth be told.
What popped into my feed was my introduction to a former Satanist, now converted to Christ through Divine Mercy. His story is compelling and a description, disturbing is not strong enough of a word for it, can be found at Lifesite News.
But what popped into my FB feed was a different screed with this quote:

“There is a deeper reason for the increase of lateness of “legally” aborting babies in New York, ADVOCATED BY GOVERNOR CUOMO (and others) that does not normally “meet the eye”:
This is happening both for body part selling, but ALSO FOR ANOTHER INSIDIOUS REASON (even from within Planned Parenthood in some circles):
Satanic abortion/murder is NOT a LEGAL OFFENSE due to provisions of Roe vs Wade. Up to now children could be aborted only up to a certain time of pregnancy.”

The link goes on to describe how Satanists take advantage of the situation, even in Planned Parenthood clinics, and how fetal parts disposal follows its own path, not necessarily the one legislators choose and claim happens publicly. The Satanists lay in wait for the sacrificed child.
Reading the account was downright nauseating, so please, dive in at your own pace. Think the worst. It probably happened.
IMO, what makes this compelling is something that happened years ago outside an abortion clinic in Rockford, Illinois, and which has been repeated elsewhere. Four priests stood on the corners of the property and began to recite the Exorcism prayers. Not the new fangled ones that were written after Vat II, but the real ones that have been used for hundreds of years to great effect. While those prayers were being said, staff from inside the building came out and cursed at the priests. They were clearly agitated. Eventually, the clinic closed.
Here is an article that references the incident. I’ll have to dig a little deeper for the real reports of this miraculous action.

“Rockford pro-life leader Kevin Rilott told LifeSiteNews.com that when a local group of priests was granted permission by the Rockford diocese to regularly pray exorcism prayers outside the Northern Illinois Women’s Center (NIWC), the change was unmistakable.
“We saw a huge change at this clinic. The number of abortions went down, the number of saves went up,” said Rilott. “The moment they began saying these prayers was the beginning of the end of this clinic.”
By the time the Rockford clinic closed following the revelation of serious health violations, NIWC had become notorious for its anti-Christian signage, including a nun in a coffin, a crucified rubber chicken, and personalized slogans insulting pro-life witnesses outside. One sign suggested that NIWC had killed 50,000 children while “JC,” or Jesus Christ, had only saved 50.”

If what the former Satanist has to say is true, then the abortion fight is literally a Good vs. Evil battle well beyond the human realm.
It’s also very scary.
It may well be the anon is dancing around this issue because the truth here will put people in the hospital to know what is being done in abortion clinics is not for the life of the mother, or just convenience, but to serve Satan. Q is trying to get us there.
That’s just the way it seems to me this morning.

Dear MAGA: 20190211 Open Topic

This epiphany-celebrating DISTRUST AND VERIFY BY SECRET METHODS MONDAY Open Thread is VERY OPEN.

You can say what you want, comment on what other people said, and so on. Keep it civil. Rules much like the Old Treehouse, except of course Q discussion is not only allowed but encouraged. A couple of other important things to consider. This here link….

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/01/01/dear-maga-open-topic-20190101/

….contains some general guidelines for things that are really, really not kosher to post here.

Also consider Wheatie’s Rules (as amended by SteveInCO):

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.
  4. No shooting at the nuclear warheads.

Remember – this is a free speech zone. Barring the few minor things that can get this site closed down, you ain’t gonna get banned.

And once the Gab commenting layer is here – BOOM.

– – · –

The current plan for Dear MAGA threads is to switch to a format where people have ONE NIGHT A WEEK that they take care of the thread. For example, Wheatie will put up the SATURDAY thread on FRIDAY NIGHT.

  • Monday – Wolf
  • Tuesday – Wolf
  • Wednesday – Wolf
  • Thursday – Wolf
  • Friday – Wolf
  • Saturday – Wheatie
  • Sunday – ThinkThinkThink

If anybody else would be interested in being a Dear MAGA author one night a week, feel free to let me know.

Remember that our greatest gift to President Trump is PRAYER!

WE ARE PRAYING FOR YOU!

And let us pray YET AGAIN for an end to the slaughter of the unborn, particularly when they have almost made it safe and sound into this world, and are being cruelly cut down just before birth by those who profit on their deaths.

Let us further pray that INFANTICIDE never again appears on this planet as an acceptable practice!


Finally, a word about the FEATURED IMAGE (the USS Ronald Reagan) and the name of the day (DISTRUST AND VERIFY BY SECRET METHODS MONDAY).

I had an EPIPHANY here:

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/02/09/q-its-time-to-return-publicly/comment-page-1/#comment-69259

…. related to Q’s post here:

And further related to a Twitter post here:

https://twitter.com/j_arthur_bloom/status/1093702446000603137

…. and two earlier posts of mine HERE:

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2018/11/22/darkness-to-light-eckerts-law/

…. and HERE:

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2018/12/06/occams-razor-tool-of-deception/

My key conclusions in the comment are these:

Here is an interesting fact of disinformation which again comes back to the entire PRINCIPLE of chaff – that chaff FEEDS the Occam’s razor of military machinery (the brains of the missile), by touching logic OUTSIDE ITS PROGRAMMING (the coolness of Occam intersecting with Turing in the region of Eckert’s Law is NOT TO BE DENIED, folks…)

ANY CHAFF SCENARIO PRESENTED TO A TRUSTING AUDIENCE WILL HAVE MORE APPARENT REALITY THAN A DISTRUSTFUL SCENARIO WHICH MORE CLOSELY ALIGNS WITH FACTS WITHHELD FROM THAT AUDIENCE.

This is simply how “magic” works. But now I want you to ask you WHO tells you this:

TRUST BUT VERIFY

I will tell you who tells you that. A magician who is so skilled in what they are doing, that they know exactly how you will verify, and have prepared for it.

I offer a new solution.

DISTRUST AND KEEP VERIFICATION METHODS HIDDEN

-Wolf Moon, The Q Tree

The implications for history – that we did not do this – or at least publicly went along with the opposite – are ASTOUNDING. To me, this is MASSIVE validation of my theory of Stefan Halper, and how he intersects two critical points in our nation’s history – the NIXON and REAGAN administrations. The fact that he and the forces behind him TOOK OUT NIXON but NOT REAGAN is one of the most fascinating chapters in geopolitics EVER. I do not have the complete set of answers about WHY things happened the way they did, but I can see that WHAT HAPPENED vis-a-vis the forces of the left and the countering strategies of both Nixon and Reagan opens up that entire portion of the game to a FRESH analysis.

Stay tuned for more.

AND DON’T FORGET THE TRUMP RALLY TONIGHT!!!

W

AMEN!
OH, WE’RE HAVIN’ SOME FUN NOW, GIPPER!