Tag: disinformation

The Adrenochrome Deception

The Truths, Lies, and Disinformation Surrounding a Mythical yet Very Real Substance

There is nothing more intriguing than an enigmatic character who defies political and cultural boundaries to tell great truths, yet mixes in just enough lies, fakery, shiny objects, red herrings, exaggerations and omissions to make himself or herself economically viable solely on their product.

It also helps if that character furthers the interests of cultural Marxism.

Exhibit A: Hunter S. Thompson

It is a minor forbidden delight to read such people, as well as to write in that style. The problem, however, is that what the author gains in the ability to “get past the censors”, is lost in terms of ultimate credibility. In the end, we are left with – more than anything else – entertainment – not journalism.

Gonzo journalism has a price. And in addition to loss of credibility, part of that price is what I would call the satanic train-wreck factor.

Read enough of a guy like Thompson, and eventually one thinks something like the following:

“THANK GOD I turned away from (fill in the blank) back when (fill in the blank), and I stopped hanging around with (fill in the blank), because otherwise I would be living through the same skanky, tacky, vomit-smelling nightmare of drugs, alcohol, bad sex and psychotic living that Hunter S. Thompson lived through, which is NO LONGER VERY FUNNY.”

Indeed – if you EVER got to the point of being “kinda sick” of any writing by Hunter S. Thompson before you finished reading it – even better if you put it down and didn’t finish it – then this article is going to make a LOT more sense, than it will to those who hung on his every word.

Hunter S Thompson, more than anybody else, was responsible for the myth of adrenochrome taking hold of America’s collective drug consciousness. Whether HST himself originated the urban legend of adrenochrome, or merely passed it on, is not certain. What IS certain, is that when people feel the need to provide SOME kind of reference to demonstrate the reality of adrenochrome, they almost always cite Hunter S. Thompson and his book, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

Here is how the “adrenochrome scene” was transferred to the big screen.

However, here is what IMDB has to say about that scene:

Near end of this film, Duke takes too much “andrenichrome” and has a nasty experience. Andrenichrome was a substance that Hunter S. Thompson made up for the book when he originally wrote it, and was kept in the script by Terry Gilliam. The name itself wasn’t new – Adrenochrome is an oxidation product of adrenaline, while Adrenochrome semicarbazone, also known as carbazochrome, is used as a medicinal drug to reduce capillary bleeding – however, neither compound is a hallucinogenic drug as portrayed in the book and film. After showing a rough cut of the film to a test audience, Gilliam was approached by a group of young men, one of which complimented him on the film in general, but said that his favorite scene was the andrenichrome scene. He said that he had used the drug, and that Gilliam had captured the effects perfectly. Gilliam didn’t have the heart to tell the kid that it was made up, and went along with his story.

IMDB Trivia entry for “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas”

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120669/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv

So what’s the truth about adrenochrome?

Let’s look at it again, but more slowly.

Adrenochrome is, for lack of a better term, a MYTHICAL DRUG.

Not a drug ampule. An “unstable research chemical” ampule.

https://www.erowid.org/library/books/adrenochrome_other_mythical.shtml

Adrenochrome is not mythical in the sense that it does not exist. It is mythical in terms of being almost 90% sexy but untrue (yet potentially profitable) legend, and 10% oddly unsexy reality.

Even the notoriously dubious aphrodisiac “Spanish fly” – which CAN (sometimes) cause priapism as an annoying side-effect of dangerous inflammation of the internal mucosa – is “more real” than adrenochrome.

All recreational drugs are, to some extent, “mythical“, in that they become focal points for petabytes of rumors, lies and disinformation. However, some drugs are more mythical than others, and of all the “highly mythical” ones, adrenochrome is one of the worst.

Adrenochrome is marketed to the unwary – meaning the vast majority of humans – by layer upon layer of mutually reinforcing LIES. With a name that sounds half-way between adrenalin – something natural, good, exciting, quasi-sexual and biochemical – and chromosome – something natural, powerful, mysterious, quasi-sexual and deeply biological – adrenochrome can be whatever your mind wants it to be.

Thus, the very name adrenochrome sets it up perfectly for its primary myth:

THE MYTH: that adrenochrome is some sort of EXOTIC BIOCHEMICAL giving an EXTREME HIGH, and that it comes from either the….

  • blood
  • pineal glands
  • pituitary glands
  • hypothalamus
  • adrenal glands
  • or some other exotic location

….of the living or recently deceased bodies of terrorized innocent people, particularly tortured, trafficked, or imprisoned women or children.

The exact myth varies, but all forms of the myth require either the murder, torture, or terrorizing of innocent people.

And it is ALL – as far as either a WORKING DRUG or an ACTUAL ORIGIN is concerned – absolute bullshit.

However, that does not mean that one cannot:

  • sell people things that they believe are or contain adrenochrome
  • buy things that one believes are or contain adrenochrome
  • do horrible things that one believes will create adrenochrome

Are you with me?

I want to make sure you understand that just because adrenochrome isn’t “real”, doesn’t mean that some or all of the sick universe surrounding it isn’t real. As one descends into the world of drugs and casual / illicit / paid sex, from there into the world of crime and cruelty, and from there into the world of satanism and utter evil, “truth” is of little value. What one BELIEVES controls reality, and people do believe a lot of really horrible stuff.

The Johnny Depp movie about satanism – “The Ninth Gate” – is instructive. People who BELIEVE in evil will ACT on those beliefs to CREATE evil. Evil EMERGES from BELIEF in it.

Or just read about the SATANIC serial killer, Richard Ramirez, who was actually PROTECTED by Dianne Feinstein (she leaked information that helped him avoid capture). The fake news media likewise HIDES and PROTECTS satanism, while demonizing the tools that evil chooses to use.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Ramirez

So, in an odd way, the VERY BELIEF in the LIES about adrenochrome actually creates the evil of it.

Are you ready for me to explain?

Good. Let’s begin.

Most people are not prepared to debunk the mythical chemistry or pharmacology of adrenochrome, and there is a huge part of the world that has no intention of debunking it, beyond doing so quietly enough to maintain their own political credibility and – in my suspicious cat opinion – CASH FLOW.

We will get to the part about CASH later.

Unless you have at least two semesters of college organic chemistry, and one semester of biochemistry, it is highly unlikely that you will be suspicious enough to figure out that there is something terribly wrong with the “standard myth” of adrenochrome.

Allow me to help.

A chemist or other scientist with enough training looks at THIS simple organic chemical structure:

Adrenochrome, C9H9NO3

….and then thinks the following:

“This is a dead simple molecule – easy to make. Even the chiral center is no problem. Heck – we could have made this in Organic I Laboratory. If it actually worked as a DRUG, people would be mainlining it or vaping it. There is no need for terrorizing children or carving out the adrenal glands of murder victims. That would be like giving somebody an ASPIRIN and then extracting aspirin from their blood. It’s ridiculous. Make it and take it, like METH.”

Short version: Adrenochrome’s own MOLECULE outs most of the myth as a lie. It is a simple organic chemical that can be made in the lab. It has been OBSERVED as the pinkish oxidation product of adrenaline since roughly 1909, and was fully identified in the laboratory in 1937.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1266980/

Upon separation, purification, and crystallization, adrenochrome is basically reddish crystals that slowly decompose and go bad in a few weeks. The reason that it goes bad is that the adrenochrome molecule is both an oxidizing agent called a “quinone”, and a reducing agent called an “amino alcohol”. Adrenochrome was born to destroy itself.

Nevertheless, for subtle chemical reasons, this substance is stable enough to work with in a laboratory or clinical setting, or even send through the mail. THAT is why scientists could actually STUDY adrenochrome AS A DRUG in the 1940’s and 1950’s. Same with adrenalin – it’s easily made, studied, and transported. SCIENTISTS MADE THEM BOTH IN THE LAB TO STUDY – a LONG time ago.

Why try to isolate these simple chemicals from any biological source, once it’s obvious what they are, and knowing that you can make them easily – on a far bigger scale than they can be isolated biologically?

Fast forward to NOW. You can buy this stuff PURE from companies like Sigma Aldrich, where EVERYBODY gets chemicals. Here it is, shipped in an ampule, to keep it nice and pure, because the stuff DOES decompose slowly at room temperature, and faster when open to the air. Even in the ampule, it slowly decomposes, so refrigerating it is a good idea – probably best kept in the FREEZER.

Now – before we get started – I want to make something EXTREMELY clear.

The MYTH of adrenochrome does not mean that people don’t actually pay a pretty penny for the stuff – WHATEVER they may actually be buying. They may be buying the real thing. They may be buying something else. They may be buying a complete LIE. Doesn’t matter.

If you know anything about the ILLEGAL AND RECREATIONAL DRUG WORLD, then you know that every single thing that is sold is very likely to be FAKE, to be IMPURE, to be a LIE, and to either NOT WORK or WORK TOO WELL, because it is really SOMETHING ELSE.

The drug world is 30% about drugs. It is 70% about MONEY. Maybe MORE. Understand that, and you will understand why the top echelon of the political left promotes the adrenochrome mythology – not openly, but through the political operative middle, who are tasked with keeping the myth alive, although THEY are not told the full truth. That effort is not simply to distract and discredit conservatives, but also to create a market among Hollyweird idiots and Shillicon Valley chumps for bogus adrenochrome products.

Do you see where this goes?

That kid in the IMDB story was very likely SOLD something – ANYTHING – under the guise of it being “adrenochrome”.

Use AND LOGIC to see all the reasons why the left promotes the adrenochrome myth. Overall, adrenochrome WORKS for the left. But not in the way that ANY of the “true believers” think it does.

I will return to this point later, in even more detail.

Now that we have cracked the first part of the myth – namely that adrenochrome is some “special” substance that needs to come from abused humans – WHICH IT DOES NOT – we can move on to the second half of the myth – WHAT REAL ADRENOCHROME ACTUALLY DOES.

Because “adrenochrome” SOUNDS LIKE “adrenaline”, people assume that it has some kind of similar effects. The adrenochrome myth always offers some kind of ultimate high or euphoria that the rich are willing to pay boo-koo bucks to experience.

This idea is ALMOST reasonable. Although adrenochrome is actually a metabolic degradation product of adrenaline, something which has strong, known effects, there ARE many cases where drugs that are given to people actually turn into STRONGER drugs in the body. The administered drugs serve as what are called “pro-drugs” – meaning they are biochemical precursors of the stuff that ACTUALLY has the main pharmacological effect. So it isn’t totally unreasonable to think that perhaps adrenochrome, as a decay product of adrenaline, has some kind of magical effect that is STRONGER than adrenaline.

However, this is NOT the case. It is KNOWN that adrenochrome does NOT have any of the profound physiological effects of adrenaline – either the same ones or different ones. In fact, like most metabolic degradation products, adrenochrome is “a lesser, weaker product that gets flushed”. It’s weaker, different, and not even particularly stable, turning into OTHER THINGS as it breaks down.

And it gets worse for the myth.

Part of the reason the myth works is that people believe adrenochrome can affect the brain, because of something called the adrenochrome hypothesis. This is a formerly dubious but increasingly foundational hypothesis that adrenochrome itself causes the symptoms of schizophrenia. It comes from the fact that early pharmacological tests of adrenochrome elicited psychotic symptoms in some subjects.

Yes, that’s right. Psychotic symptoms. Not Psychedelic. PSYCHOTIC.

This is not exactly something that people who want to get HIGH are looking for. They may be looking for pretty colors. They are probably NOT looking for turning into a crazy person.

Here is a quote:

Several small-scale studies (involving 15 or fewer test subjects) conducted in the 1950s and 1960s reported that adrenochrome triggered psychotic reactions such as thought disorder, derealization, and euphoria.[2] Researchers Abram Hoffer and Humphry Osmond claimed that adrenochrome is a neurotoxic, psychotomimetic substance and may play a role in schizophrenia and other mental illnesses.[3] In what they called the “adrenochrome hypothesis”,[4] they speculated that megadoses of vitamin C and niacin could cure schizophrenia by reducing brain adrenochrome.[5][6] While the treatment of schizophrenia with such potent anti-oxidants is highly contested in the literature, and adrenochrome is not currently believed to have any psychedelic properties,[7] a number of recently published papers consider Hoffer’s paper a landmark contribution to the notion that impairment of what’s now termed the anti-oxidant defense system (AODS) seems to play a role in schizophrenia.[8]

Wikipedia, entry for Adrenochrome

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrenochrome#Effect_on_the_brain

A good insider review of the history and scientific politics of the adrenochrome hypothesis, along with the somewhat allied movement called orthomolecular psychiatry, can be found here:

http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/1999/articles/1999-v14n01-p049.shtml

To put things quickly in perspective, one might say that the original adrenochrome hypothesis was a crude but remarkably foretelling sketch of what we now know to be true. It turns out that oxidized neurotransmitters such as adrenaline ARE in fact partially responsible for neurotoxic degradation of neurons in the brain, and THAT is in turn largely responsible for neurological diseases including schizophrenia and Parkinsonism.

An example of the kind of research that brought increasing respect for the adrenochrome hypothesis is this paper, showing that certain enzymes which may be missing or impaired in schizophrenia are capable of removing adrenochrome.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1218396/

Similarly, and in an almost remarkable proof of the current model of schizophrenia and Parkinsonism, the very oxidizing agents that can be used in the laboratory or factory to turn adrenaline into adrenochrome, are in some cases THEMSELVES neurotoxic in almost exactly the same way.

In other words, chemicals that can MAKE adrenochrome from adrenaline in the lab, appear to make it in the body, too. But they don’t make people high. They make them very ill, by attacking the brain, similarly to schizophrenia and Parkinsonism.

Pretty powerful logic, isn’t it?

So – adrenochrome causing short-term psychotic symptoms makes some sense (although THAT is where the science is again complicated).

But what about “euphoria”?

Now, the word “euphoria” is noted from this early adrenochrome research, but we need to temper that with the fact that the world’s EXPERTS on euphoria produced by recreational drugs – meaning EXPLORATORY SELF-TESTING DRUG ABUSERS – have NOT found real adrenochrome to be a worthwhile recreational drug.

Let’s go now to EROWID – which is basically an online cyber-collective of druggies who actually care about the details of drugs. They’re a bit like volunteer librarians in the world of illicit drugs. Here is their money quote on adrenochrome:

Adrenochrome is an oxidation product of adrenaline (ephinephrine, norepinephrine). It has achieved mythical status as a deliberately-ingested psychoactive — boosted by H.S. Thompson’s Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas — though it is debated whether it has any psychoactive effects at all.

Erowid entry on Adrenochrome

https://www.erowid.org/chemicals/adrenochrome/adrenochrome.shtml

The most useful report was by a science-minded self-tester nicknamed genaro, who obtained commercial adrenochrome and self-administered it three ways, obtaining the exact same effects every time.

  • sublingual and oral (under tongue, then swallowed)
  • nasal (snorted)
  • smoked (crack pipe)

His report is entitled “Killing the Myth” (you can guess what that means), and is partly included below, so hang on before you click. I’m just giving the references. The best description is here:

https://www.erowid.org/experiences/exp.php?ID=51847

Genaro also repeated his report and discussed it with other drug experimenters here:

https://drugs-forum.com/threads/adrenochrome-report.17239/

Adrenochrome is apparently not difficult to obtain. Although researchers can get it from more legitimate suppliers such as Sigma-Aldrich:

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/a5752?lang=en&region=US

It is also available from less reputable “Chinese research chemical suppliers” who have fronts in the United States.

https://www.medkoo.com/products/20409

Genaro appears to have gotten his adrenochrome from a legitimate chemical supplier in Europe.

Genaro’s experience with adrenochrome was less impressive than most drugs, and frankly on par with the “recreationally uninteresting” effects of schizophrenia, if even that. Adrenochrome clearly had some mental effect, but nothing interesting enough that most people who enjoy any form of recreational drug – including caffeine or nicotine – would be interested.

Per Genaro:

To sum up, effects were extremely weak, absolutely not fun nor psychedelic in anyway, and short lived (I would say the slight initial euphoria is gone within 4-5 minutes, and the few strange feelings that I experience from the stuff are gone within about 1 hour (I couldn’t say the exact duration as I didn’t really checked my watch) 
Needless to say I was very disappointed by this uninteresting compound. 

The effects I had from it were flimsy, there was a definite effect on my vision and my mental state for sure but I would definitely not call it ‘hallucinogenic’. 

Genaro, anonymous test user of adrenochrome

There are other users who have tried unpurified oxidized adrenaline in lieu of purified adrenochrome, but their experiences (stimulation, headache) sound very much like exactly what they administered – degraded adrenaline – and not pure adrenochrome.

This lack of hallucinogenic effect from any form of adrenochrome seems to be a consensus, despite the fact that the “hallucinogenic” nature of old, oxidized, “pink”, medical adrenaline WAS indeed one of the reasons that adrenochrome was investigated as a potential hallucinogen and/or neurotoxin in the first place.

My thinking here is that this is simply the classic ambiguity of the word “hallucinogenic” in pharmacology, ranging from minor visual disturbances to florid, dream-like, false experiences. Adrenochrome appears to cause the former – NOT the latter, which is generally desired by recreational drug users who are interested in hallucinogens.

In any case, what we are talking about with adrenochrome is clearly NOT a useful or attractive recreational drug.

So why is there any REAL interest in adrenochrome?

Why are there PATENTS?

Why are there, in fact, LOTS of patents?

The reason is subtle. Adrenochrome doesn’t really have any uses as a psychiatric drug, but it DOES have use as a hemostatic – to STOP BLEEDING.

Are you starting to see where some of the ideas for the MYTH of adrenochrome came from? From distortion of reality? Good.

The fact is, adrenochrome itself isn’t even a very good hemostat, because it decomposes so quickly. HOWEVER, in organic chemistry, there are KNOWN WAYS to stabilize substances like adrenochrome, and THAT is exactly what was done. The medically useful compounds are DERIVATIVES – specifically what are called CARBONYL DERIVATIVES – of adrenochrome.

What chemists do is take the double-bonded oxygens of adrenochrome – the quinone carbonyls – the things that make it reactive and unstable – and turn one of them into a double-bonded nitrogen with some additional stabilizer atoms attached. This is a NOTORIOUSLY EFFECTIVE TRICK for stabilizing certain molecules, and even for identifying those molecules through the stabilized derivatives. Organic chemists use this technique all the time.

The carbonyl derivatives of adrenochrome are called oximes, hydrazones, and semicarbazones. Almost ALL of these substances are useful as hemostats, and even better, they LACK the neurological effects of adrenochrome itself.

THIS is why adrenochrome is primarily manufactured – as an INTERMEDIATE for other more useful drugs.

That is it. That is the TRUTH about adrenochrome.

SO – now that we know the TRUTH about adrenochrome – how it is neither a pleasing recreational drug, nor something that must be obtained through wicked and murderous methods – we have to ask – why don’t the LIES go away?

Therein lies an even uglier truth. The adrenochrome myth is a typical satanic LIE that generates satanic REALITY by virtue of belief.

There are people who WANT others to believe the myth. And they want others to believe the myth, because it gives them POWER and MONEY. The nature of the power and the money VARY with the audience, but that is just fine with the people who benefit from it. They FOOL everybody, even if they fool them DIFFERENTLY.

Let me explain.

SATAN: Knock, knock.

Who’s there?

Satan.

Satan who?

Satan who can make you pollute your own mind by thinking about sex with children and child murder.

No way!

Your ENEMIES are having sex with stolen children and murdering them for ADRENOCHROME, and then getting HIGH on it!

OMG! My enemies are…..

SATAN: My work is done.

Starting to see how this works? This is a HUGE component of Pizzagate, sadly. Yes, there is real evil. Getting people to obsess about it to the point of unbelievability SPREADS THE EVIL FIRST and PROTECTS IT SECOND.

See how that works? And the adrenochrome isn’t even real. It’s ALL A LIE.

Are you seeing that extra bit of Satan – that hollowness at the end of the deal with the devil – the fact that the drug itself is actually a LIE, and DOESN’T EVEN REALLY WORK?

It gets worse.

SATAN: Knock, knock.

Who’s there?

Satan.

Satan who?

Satan who knows about the ultimate drug.

No way!

Good bye.

OMG! What if this ultimate drug is real?

SATAN: My work is done.

Just because something isn’t TRUE, doesn’t mean that there aren’t people who will not only believe the myth, but who will FEED it, and KEEP IT ALIVE.

And more than THOSE people, who keep the myth alive, there are other people who will pay top dollar to LIVE in the myth.

The debauched world of drugs, sex, money and fame is filled with people who want to believe in the NEXT HIGH of any kind. Those people are sitting on a world of cash.

Normally, I could not sell a pop singer teen celebrity a diverted unit of blood or blood plasma if my life depended on it. But thanks to the MYTH of adrenochrome, I can sell them either of these for absurd amounts of money, by telling them that there is something extra special about the stuff in the bag.

But let’s say that I’m not connected to a highly corrupted humanitarian organization where I can get blood products on the cheap. Doesn’t matter with something as mythical as adrenochrome. I can still sell people literally ANY drug or drug combination as “adrenochrome”, and most people who buy illicit drugs will believe it, at the right price.

People can even make money on the MYTH ITSELF.

Consider this 2017 movie, which is probably most famous for being SUED by Coachella for creating its own imitation festival called “filmchilla” as a marketing device.

The fact that there is a sickening, terrible, grade Z, stoner-cult, gore-cult, Satan-cult, cultural Marxist movie CALLED Adrenochrome should already be setting off alarm bells.

But remember – that’s just how they market the myth to THEMSELVES – the people who LOVE the sickness.

They market the myth to YOU differently.

Like THIS:

It’s ALL disinformation. But just because YOU would not BUY IT, doesn’t mean that OTHERS would not pay good money for it. And the more YOU believe the LIES, the more OTHERS will as well.

Are you seeing how the myth works? The MONEY is the key. But there is also POWER in it. Why? Because if you sell somebody a fake drug ALLEGEDLY from killed children, just IMAGINE what kind of blackmail power that has.

Adrenochrome is more of a satanic lie, than a satanic reality, but it’s still satanic.

Now – even though there MAY NOT REALLY BE some multi-billion dollar adrenochrome industry, I’m willing to bet that there ARE people making a pretty penny on the myth, just like any other illicit drug, and I’ll bet the money gets up into the low millions, or maybe the tens of millions worldwide.

Nothing huge, but NOT non-existent. The “low end” of the market definitely exists.

The main reason that I am CONFIDENT there is a market for an alleged adrenochrome product, is that it would be SIMILAR and PARALLEL to the market for LIFE EXTENSION. That market is among the RICH and POWERFUL, and it is VERY, VERY REAL.

I actually knew, at some point in my life, somebody who I would regard as a “lower-level cabal” member. This was a very anonymous person, but very high in the pantheon of leftist virtue – receiving a kind of weird respect – almost veneration – from very powerful people. This person was also a FANATIC about life extension, spending significant time and money looking for exotic biomedical and biochemical ways to live longer.

Read about Sergey Brin of Google. Same thing. There is an OBSESSION among these very self-important people, about making their important lives last just a wee bit longer.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/31/google-co-founders-and-silicon-valley-billionaires-try-to-live-forever.html

https://www.businessinsider.com/tech-billionaires-life-extension-projects-2015-4

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2015/04/04/tech-titans-latest-project-defy-death/

https://phys.org/news/2013-02-zuckerberg-brin-life.html

The list goes on – VERY long – just “google it”. “Life extension”.

Are these people a market for “young blood transfusions”, and perhaps for some of them, at several times the price, “adrenochrome blood transfusions”?

I have ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT about it.

If you don’t believe me, believe Scientific American, reporting in both skeptical and shocked tones, on the level of interest in “young blood transfusions”, in a case where the tip of the iceberg broke the waterline:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/young-blood-transfusions-are-on-the-menu-at-society-gala/

There are a number of interesting links in the article. Such as this one.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/infusions-of-young-blood-tested-in-patients-with-dementia/

This is a very real thing, and the Fake News Media – not unpredictably – “accidentally” promotes the market in hushed but knowing tones. Just look at the articles I cited. Those would have been PARODIES 50 years ago.

See what I keep saying about “fake science”? It goes with fake news and fake entertainment, both of which are really propaganda.

The actual market for [fake] adrenochrome is probably among the more libertine, occult-friendly, drug-taking, and risk-taking segments of the rich and powerful, as opposed to the more self-protecting “life extension” personalities.

Like I said, I’m speculating here, but I think I’m on solid ground. Adrenochrome is an “illicit” drug. People can read about it in a cool book by an establishment-approved author, glorified for years in “Doonesbury”, that was made into a Hollywood movie. There is AUTOMATIC DEMAND.

The more MYTHICAL, the more LEGENDARY, the better.

And wanting to be legendary is – well – quite common.

So there you have it.

This brings us full-circle, back to Hunter S. Thompson. Both the beginning and end of FAKE adrenochrome. The MAKER OF MYTHS was probably also the CONSUMER OF MYTHS – and if not him, then that still falls to the LEGIONS of “adrenochrome” buzz-buzzards that one finds on the internet, searching for information about adrenochrome, some of them hoping to try it. In researching this article, I found them everywhere.

https://youtu.be/1d-B8_pwDnE

My recommendation? Don’t be one of them. Stay the HELL away from the hell of illicit drugs, both REAL and MYTHICAL. But perhaps say a prayer for those who don’t take that advice. Because THOSE folks are very real, and they don’t always live long and prosper.

Having had my own life-long string of follies and recovered errors of other kinds….

Having suffered my own stormy experiences, thinking I was merely going to learn a little science – like perhaps the structure of adrenochrome….

Perhaps none of us really stay on shore….

Perhaps all of us are out there in boats – caught in various tempests….

Even when we don’t think that’s where we are.

Therefore – I propose a toast.

To life. May we all experience it abundantly. And truly. As designed.

W

The Story of Creation

PS – I note the psychologically toxic effects of simply doing this article. There is a lesson in that. There are MANY lessons. Time to do some more reading in the Bible.

Dear MAGA: 20190211 Open Topic

This epiphany-celebrating DISTRUST AND VERIFY BY SECRET METHODS MONDAY Open Thread is VERY OPEN.

You can say what you want, comment on what other people said, and so on. Keep it civil. Rules much like the Old Treehouse, except of course Q discussion is not only allowed but encouraged. A couple of other important things to consider. This here link….

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/01/01/dear-maga-open-topic-20190101/

….contains some general guidelines for things that are really, really not kosher to post here.

Also consider Wheatie’s Rules (as amended by SteveInCO):

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.
  4. No shooting at the nuclear warheads.

Remember – this is a free speech zone. Barring the few minor things that can get this site closed down, you ain’t gonna get banned.

And once the Gab commenting layer is here – BOOM.

– – · –

The current plan for Dear MAGA threads is to switch to a format where people have ONE NIGHT A WEEK that they take care of the thread. For example, Wheatie will put up the SATURDAY thread on FRIDAY NIGHT.

  • Monday – Wolf
  • Tuesday – Wolf
  • Wednesday – Wolf
  • Thursday – Wolf
  • Friday – Wolf
  • Saturday – Wheatie
  • Sunday – ThinkThinkThink

If anybody else would be interested in being a Dear MAGA author one night a week, feel free to let me know.

Remember that our greatest gift to President Trump is PRAYER!

WE ARE PRAYING FOR YOU!

And let us pray YET AGAIN for an end to the slaughter of the unborn, particularly when they have almost made it safe and sound into this world, and are being cruelly cut down just before birth by those who profit on their deaths.

Let us further pray that INFANTICIDE never again appears on this planet as an acceptable practice!

Finally, a word about the FEATURED IMAGE (the USS Ronald Reagan) and the name of the day (DISTRUST AND VERIFY BY SECRET METHODS MONDAY).

I had an EPIPHANY here:

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/02/09/q-its-time-to-return-publicly/comment-page-1/#comment-69259

…. related to Q’s post here:

And further related to a Twitter post here:

https://twitter.com/j_arthur_bloom/status/1093702446000603137

…. and two earlier posts of mine HERE:

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2018/11/22/darkness-to-light-eckerts-law/

…. and HERE:

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2018/12/06/occams-razor-tool-of-deception/

My key conclusions in the comment are these:

Here is an interesting fact of disinformation which again comes back to the entire PRINCIPLE of chaff – that chaff FEEDS the Occam’s razor of military machinery (the brains of the missile), by touching logic OUTSIDE ITS PROGRAMMING (the coolness of Occam intersecting with Turing in the region of Eckert’s Law is NOT TO BE DENIED, folks…)

ANY CHAFF SCENARIO PRESENTED TO A TRUSTING AUDIENCE WILL HAVE MORE APPARENT REALITY THAN A DISTRUSTFUL SCENARIO WHICH MORE CLOSELY ALIGNS WITH FACTS WITHHELD FROM THAT AUDIENCE.

This is simply how “magic” works. But now I want you to ask you WHO tells you this:

TRUST BUT VERIFY

I will tell you who tells you that. A magician who is so skilled in what they are doing, that they know exactly how you will verify, and have prepared for it.

I offer a new solution.

DISTRUST AND KEEP VERIFICATION METHODS HIDDEN

-Wolf Moon, The Q Tree

The implications for history – that we did not do this – or at least publicly went along with the opposite – are ASTOUNDING. To me, this is MASSIVE validation of my theory of Stefan Halper, and how he intersects two critical points in our nation’s history – the NIXON and REAGAN administrations. The fact that he and the forces behind him TOOK OUT NIXON but NOT REAGAN is one of the most fascinating chapters in geopolitics EVER. I do not have the complete set of answers about WHY things happened the way they did, but I can see that WHAT HAPPENED vis-a-vis the forces of the left and the countering strategies of both Nixon and Reagan opens up that entire portion of the game to a FRESH analysis.

Stay tuned for more.

AND DON’T FORGET THE TRUMP RALLY TONIGHT!!!

W

AMEN!
OH, WE’RE HAVIN’ SOME FUN NOW, GIPPER!

Preparing for the MK Reveal: Tavistock Basics

I am now convinced that Q is signaling upcoming revelation on what people commonly refer to as “MK Ultra”, but which is in reality an array of semi-secret technologies used for a seamless program of individual and mass psychological manipulation.

I had been hoping things would go in this direction for a variety of reasons – some personal, but mostly because I don’t believe in deceptive manipulation of humanity. It really is that simple.

The old “MK Ultra” revelation was a beautiful disinformation campaign. What it did was expose the outlines of old and possibly semi-mythical tech, and say it didn’t work very well. Even better, the MK Ultra release associated the technology with Nazis, when the deep work was actually done by the ENEMIES of the Nazis (Americans, British, Jewish exiles and communists – in large part fighting the Nazis).

See how that works? PSYCHOLOGY – exactly the weapon these people were – and ARE – so skilled at.

Now – a note about “MK Ultra”.

Sometimes I say “advanced psychological tools” or things like that – this sounds a lot less “tin foil” than “MK Ultra”, and implies that we could even be talking about BETTER STUFF. However, I find that the buzz provided by the acronym “MK” conveys exactly what I want to say – that we are talking about a REALITY that smacks of the intentionally discredited “MK Ultra” meme, yet it is REAL.

Recall the recent MK post by Q:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 82bacc No.4639875 
Jan 7 2019 00:24:44 (EST)
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7920010/cia-mkultra-mind-control-drugs-hypnosis-electric-documents/
Program dev ongoing under offshore [not domestic] ‘tangent’ agency?
Covert funding?
Animals > Humans
Humans 1988
71% avg success rate.
Targeted (mental) ‘criteria’ designated as [ , ].
Mental institutions & therapists > ‘program-specialists’…..
Cocktail regimen 4x daily brain intercept [administered by ]
Hint:
https://ncats.nih.gov/pubs/features/brain-signals-action
WIA military personnel targets of the program?
PTSD+
Clandestine Black OPs > zero affiliation (non_stick)
Something out of a movie?
Fiction?
The hole is deep.
Q

Q Post 2663

To me, this was NOT a sufficient commitment to declassification – through Huber, the OIG, or any other mechanism – that I would say there was definitely going to be a reveal.

HOWEVER, because the Q operation is extremely smart and is STILL plausibly deniable to my super-skeptical Suspicious Cat mind, it can only be validated at this time by its EFFECTS, which no adversary would WANT – even for some disinformative or political tactical purpose.

In essence, I see Q mostly validated by EFFECTS, not by many other things people find convincing.

In the case of “MK Ultra”, loosely defined as both myth and reality, those effects are now classified (to my thinking) as CAT_OUT_OF_THE_BAG, thanks to THIS video, which was PROMPTED by Q.

This video tells me that the Q project is generating REAL awakening on MK. There is simply no stopping it now, in my opinion.

https://youtu.be/m5kbBOpM5Dg

Don’t watch the video yet – come back to it after I prepare you for what it is and what it is NOT.

This video covers a Twitter thread by Ninja Warrior, about which he is competently interviewed. That thread it HERE:

This thread deals surprisingly little with what most regard as “MK Ultra“.

In fact, it really doesn’t even discuss what the various Tavistock entities (it’s a real spider web) are up to these days.

For our purposes, Tavistock has been, since the 1990’s (you know – the Clinton years – Beelzebubba’s friend Tony Blair and all that) mostly connected to GUN CONTROL, the LGBT AGENDA, and the TRANS NARRATIVE.

When Eric Holder was talking about “brainwashing against guns“, he was talking TAVISTOCK.

Tavistock was intensely rumored to be associated with the event in Tasmania that resulted in Australia’s massive gun ban – mass murder by a psycho named Martin Bryant.

Photo: The Daily Telegraph. Port Arthur massacre killer Martin Bryant.

Thus, reports of a sketchy Australian intimately connected to the Las Vegas shooter Paddock on the night of the Mandalay Bay massacre set off alarm bells for many, that this was more Tavistock work, possibly using Australian assets, including Paddock’s FBI-connected girlfriend, but using an American face.

More visibly, Tavistock is now associated with the social contagion of childhood-declared transgenderism, and the basic setting of the “medical” narrative surrounding it.

However, this video doesn’t talk about any actual specific agendas.

Instead, what this video does is to lay out a very broad historical outline of the founding, leadership, philosophy, and beliefs OF the Tavistock “movement”, if you will, during the early and middle 20th century.

At first glance, that should not MEAN anything. It’s not obvious that this would affect declassification of MK technologies, at the very least in some broad sense of admitting that they have been used and abused.

However, once you watch this, you will see what I mean.

One cannot watch this video and not walk away thinking something like:

“Holy shit – these people aren’t just ADMITTING that they think about the kinds of sneaky international subversions that Tavistock has been accused of – they are positively ECSTATIC about such actions. They truly BELIEVE in this garbage.”

Now – it’s even bigger for me. I have many deep questions about WHY certain things have happened – small details in a relatively unknown scandal I call “CA3”, and even more profoundly, DECADES of aftermath, including various attempts to cover up the loose ends of that scandal. Numerous odd angles, including various sketchy British people, made little or no sense. But they do now.

Almost ALL questions are answered if TAVISTOCK, or various Tavistock-influenced individuals, groups, organizations and agencies were involved.

But let me tell you, any revelations by me are going to be DWARFED by what is coming.

After watching the video, you will likely be thinking of certain EVENTS, and asking yourselves a very simple question:

How was TAVISTOCK connected to this?

I had earlier said that we could end almost all mass murders in America if we could excise all things TAVISTOCK from the world, and I stand by that idea.

Remember what I said earlier about real “MK”, as I call it. It is an array of public, secret, semi-secret, and obscure technologies used for a seamless program of individual and mass psychological manipulation.

The important part is this: “…a seamless program of individual and mass psychological manipulation.“

One of the beauties of MK as a toolkit, ranging from individual to global in its effects, is that it precisely mirrors the asymmetric nature of actual “event psychology” – the way the psychology of a SINGLE individual can affect the entire planet. That is why I say SEAMLESS.

If that’s not clear, let’s try this one:

You see what I mean by asymmetric warfare?

However, this is not all that MK can be used for.

Go back to that image from earlier. Read the caption again. This is from the Daily Mail, in 2013, when Obama won re-election and began moving forward with his radical agenda, including the “trans narrative” in schools.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2508704/NHS-Tavistock-Clinic-treating-transgender-children-therapies-prepare-sex-change.html

Now go BACK to see how cavalier TAVISTOCK was in regards to “civilizing” those savages in America to the British way.

Now – let’s think about the idea of “subversive therapy” – something which fits into Tavistock philosophy set forth by their own leaders.

Take a look HERE:

“A different therapist who appears to have visited the family at their home….”

“WRRRRREALLY.”

We will talk more about MK. This video prepares you for that.

MK is not magic. There are things it can do, and things it cannot do.

It can even FAIL SPECTACULARLY.

Enjoy the show.

W

Don’t mind the occasional failure, unless it becomes a meme.

Occam's Razor, Tool of Deception

I was originally going to entitle this post something else – something cuter and more grandiose about “my life-long sword-fight with Occam’s razor“.  Hence the opening image.  However, that goal was WAY too big for a blog post.  I could literally write a book on it.

The fact is, I have MANY issues with Occam’s razor in science and other forms of investigation, and most of them don’t deal with deception.  They deal with progress in science, more than anything else.  Although the modern intrusions of leftist deception politics into science are changing that balance very rapidly. 

Some scientists tend to shave too closely with Occam’s razor.  Nothing grows.  There is no imagination – no progress.  It is easier to sit tight on a small set of highly validated principles, and not reach out to try something new.

Others don’t shave at all, and “fluffy” no-way-in-hell theory grows with abandon.   Such theories approach the ad hoc nature that Occam’s razor was specifically intended to prevent.  Instead of angels on pinheads, embarrassing numbers of never-to-be-found particles and whatnot are predicted, proposed, or just rumored.

Those are big topics.  Addressing all of that, plus the use of Occam’s razor for deception, would be a tall order.  Best left for our wonderful commenters, already discussing these things just on the rumor of my finally posting this piece.

While sleeping on this post (earlier), I realized that I needed to keep things simple, and ONLY talk about how Occam’s razor behaves under deception.  Thus, I came up with a much simpler and more powerful statement of the principle at hand.  Then, I decided to pound that statement into people’s heads, by repeating it, over and over.

Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.

Wolf Moon

Actually, that’s not giving credit where credit is due.

Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.

Anonymous author of KGB-CIA manual read by various people Wolf Moon has known

Actually, that’s not big enough.  It needs to be a nice big headline.

Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.

There.  That’s better!  And THAT is why I changed the title.  If I’m going to repeat a headline over and over, why not just make it the title, too?  That way people won’t have to dig for it.  The conclusion is RIGHT THERE.  To review for the big picture, people don’t even have to re-read this post.

Now, I can’t tell you ALL of the reasons why I believe this, but my motto serves as a kind of proof that the opening image and would-be title are justified – that I’ve had to FIGHT Occam’s razor all my life.  Indeed, I chose my motto carefully, after years of fighting my way up from a state of blissful ignorance, to one of satisfied but battle-scarred awareness.

It is better to be right than to be believed.

Wolf Moon

Being right does not come easily in this world, because DECEPTION is everywhere.  And deception is everywhere for a beautiful reason, which a better understanding of OCCAM’S RAZOR makes clear:

Occam’s razor is a protector of deception.

Yeah.  You’re going to hear that a LOT of things linking Occam’s razor not with FINDING truth, but rather with HIDING truth.

So what the hell IS Occam’s razor?  Other than a tool of deception?

OK – that’s not really Occam’s razor.  This is more like it.

When we are faced with more than one hypothesis that explains the data equally well, we choose the simpler explanation.

Occam’s razor

Now, the fact that many CORRECT answers ARE complex, and so many simple ones fail, or at least it sure SEEMS that way, makes the following cartoon funny.

We see in the cartoon an idea that LOOKS like Occam’s razor because it deals with simple versus complex, but also seems to say the opposite.  Yet the cartoon seems to say something intuitively obvious and wearily true – that many answers are simple but wrong, and the fewer that ARE correct, are generally complicated. 

This seems at first to be at odds with Occam’s razor, but it’s not – because it’s NOT Occam’s razor, nor is it a derivative thereof.  It just looks like Occam’s razor.  Stop for a moment and think about that.  The cartoon is talking about the fact that it sure seems to us humans that REAL answers tend to be few and complex – while too-simple and WRONG answers seem to abound.  That is MUCH DIFFERENT from saying that for TWO OR MORE theories that explain the same set of facts, the SIMPLEST theory tends to be correct.

In fact, if you CONFUSE these two principles, then you have just seen why

Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.

That is worth an explanation.  You see, there is an old saw about simple versus complex.  It’s called Occam’s razor.  When people talk about simple versus complex, they ALMOST ALWAYS cite Occam’s razor.  So if a person does a cartoon about simple versus complex, and they say something that seems to be both TRUE and the OPPOSITE of Occam’s razor, it looks like a paradox – like Occam’s razor is “wrong or something”. 

Well, it’s the “or something”.  The cartoon has successfully, without trying very hard, mimicked Occam’s razor.  And MIMICRY is a form of DECEPTION.  You were led into a mistake by a cartoon.

Thus, in a very ironic way, the ubiquity of Occam’s razor ITSELF was used to deceive.  The SIMPLEST answer – “a person talking about simple versus complex is talking about Occam’s razor” – was used to deceive you, and then lead you past deception to paradox, at which point you do a “WTF” and laughed.

Now – there are MANY WAYS to express the principles underlying the fact that

Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.

One of the simplest is the one that our own wheatietoo uses all the time.  This is the idea that

Occam’s razor can fail when you don’t have all the information.

And if somebody WANTS it to fail for you, this is WHY

Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.

As an example, let’s consider the “Bigfoot” example above. 

“A hairy creature in the woods is more likely a bear than Bigfoot.”
-Occam’s Razor

If you see an upright, bipedal, very hairy creature in the woods, you have almost certainly seen a BEAR.   We have an ordinary explanation.  No need to state anything fancy.  THAT is Occam’s razor, right there.

But what if the “hairy creature in the woods” had a flat face and no snout – basically a hominid face – and this was seen with extreme clarity, so there is almost no possibility for error?  If that is the case, then the simple explanation of a bear goes out the window.  There is the possibility of a highly deformed or accidentally de-snouted bear, but such a thing will not live long in the wild.  A truly flat-faced bear is pretty much DOA at birth.  HOWEVER, we can switch to the SIMPLER theory that it’s a GORILLA – possibly escaped from a zoo – and we have basically been rescued by Occam’s razor.

But let’s not stop there.  Let’s say that the thing was seen with extreme clarity.  The witness KNOWS what a gorilla looks like, and it was NOT a gorilla.  Let’s say that we have a clear enough view of it that it looks exactly like “Bigfoot”.

Now – we can believe two things here.

  • It was a “real” Bigfoot.
  • It was somebody in a Bigfoot suit, DECEIVING US.

Which one of these alternatives is the one favored by Occam’s razor?  That is actually a very good question.  To an honest naturalist in the woods of Washington or Oregon in 1910, when “cryptozoology” was still somewhat possible, a “real” animal of some sort would have seemed more likely.  The idea of somebody using a suit to deceive a naturalist would have sounded fantastic, and would require far more explanation than a new species of animal.

But in 2010, with many more “Bigfoot costumes” in existence than reported visual sightings of Bigfoot in all of history, the prediction FLIPS, because we have NEW INFORMATION.  We have to allow for DECEPTION as a kind of additional information.

BIGFOOT DECEPTION is now ORDINARY.  BIGFOOT REALITY remains rather EXTRAORDINARY.

Now – what if you’re a modern person, but your knowledge is like that of a naturalist in 1910?  What if you are not AWARE of what deceptions are POSSIBLE?  In that case you will use Occam’s razor on the WRONG DATA SET.  You will be DECEIVED, and Occam’s razor, operating on insufficient data, will AID THE DECEPTION.

This is how magic works, folks.  The SIMPLE and OBVIOUS explanation is WRONG.  Hidden complexity is used to FOOL YOU.  YOU don’t have all the information.  By HIDING information, you are led to USE Occam’s razor with too little information, and come to the wrong conclusion.

Now with magic, we know we are being fooled.  But then again, nobody has to TELL YOU that you are experiencing a magic show.

Welcome to DISINFORMATION.

And this is the most important part.  It doesn’t have to be something extraordinary like Bigfoot.  I could just be trying to convince you of an ordinary fact.  That is not true.

Let me repeat that.  If I try to convince you of an OBVIOUS, SIMPLE NON-EXTRAORDINARY THING, but it’s really a complicated, deceptive story that benefits me, Occam’s razor just turned into MY advantage, and MY survival tool.

Two words.

Insect mimicry.

The simple explanation is that it’s a THORN.  It’s not.  It’s a LEAF-HOPPER.

The simple explanation is that it’s a LEAF.  It’s not.  It’s a BUTTERFLY.

The simple explanation is that it’s a BEE.  It’s not.  It’s a FLY. 

The simple explanation is that it’s LICHEN.  It’s not.  It’s a MOTH.

The simple explanation is that it’s a FLOWER PETAL.  It’s not.  It’s a SPIDER / MANTIS / ASSASSIN BUG.

If you look MORE CLOSELY at any one of these, you get MORE INFORMATION, and go “OH SHIT, LOOK AT THAT!” and see the coolness of the DECEPTION.  What has happened is that MORE INFORMATION changed the output of Occam’s razor.  You now have MORE FACTS.

One might say that:

Occam’s razor is dependent upon the observer, whereas truth is not.

Now – back to an explanation of Occam’s razor which deals with “ordinary” versus “extraordinary”:

One has to be very careful here.  ORDINARY and EXTRAORDINARY are likely to flip back and forth as FACTS BECOME KNOWN, as our EXPERIENCE with those facts increases, and as the validity of those facts CHANGES.

BLACK HOLES were at one time EXTRAORDINARY.  Now they are NOT.

Relativistic effects in general were at one time EXTRAORDINARY.  Now they are NOT.

Atomic energy was at one time EXTRAORDINARY.  Now it is NOT.

Talking to somebody on the other side of the world was once EXTRAORDINARY.  Now it is ORDINARY.

Aluminum was at one time EXTRAORDINARY and PRECIOUS.  Now it is COMMON and can be used for TIN FOIL HATS. 

There is a reason the INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES try to stay ahead of the curve, BUELLER.  It is so THEY have all the FACTS and YOU DON’T.

Are you starting to see the picture now? 

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER WHEN THE OTHER PERSON DOESN’T HAVE IT.

In other words, it’s not really knowledge that is power.  It’s a DIFFERENTIAL in knowledge that is power.

Now – put this in reality terms.  This point about Ordinary vs. Extraordinary is very important for assisting DECEPTION.  If I can HIDE the formerly extraordinary as MY ordinary, I can almost guarantee that the SUCKER will pick the known ORDINARY explanation.  But if I LOSE the SECRET of my extraordinary, it becomes the TARGET’S ordinary, and they are no longer fooled.

WELCOME TO MY WORLD.

Now – even in deception, Occam’s razor still operates.  If you have all the information, and there are two ways you can be fooled, the SIMPLER ONE is probably the RIGHT ONE.

If you are being deceived about ORDINARY STUFF and there are competing ORDINARY EXPLANATIONS, you are very likely to MISS EVERYTHING.  The same goes for TWO COMPETING EXTRAORDINARY EXPLANATIONS.  If there is deception, you can use Occam’s razor to pick the wrong one, by picking the SIMPLER of the two, if you don’t know all the facts.

And THAT is where we are led into one of the most EXTRAORDINARY events in modern history.

Next time, in:

9/11: From Believer to Skeptic

See you then!

W

“History is a great teacher, but she makes us do a LOT of homework.”

Ride-'Em Skippy!

How the Real Story of Russian Collusion Nukes Robert Mueller and the DNC with John Podesta

If you noticed the EERIE BLUE-VIOLET GLOW around John Podesta’s head in my little graphic, don’t worry.  It’s not RADIATION, even though I just put that idea into your head and you can do NOTHING about that, because you read this sentence.

More about that in a moment.

While John Podesta is about to become RADIOACTIVE, that blue glow is only my BAD graphic skills, extracting his head from THIS PICTURE…..

HEIL HILLARY!

…..and putting it into THIS PICTURE……

“YAHOO!  Cultural Marxism Away!”

Yet notice – most interestingly – that I made a DEFICIT – my poor graphical software skills in working propaganda against John Podesta – into an ASSET – by the power of SUGGESTION.

Beautiful, isn’t it?  That implication – that mere suggestion of RADIATION makes you feel all ICKY – doesn’t it?  You don’t even want to look BACK at that picture.  Right?  But maybe you do.  And if you do, you get a kind of perverse, sick, dirty feeling out of it.  Right?  That GLOW.

You can thank the Soviet Union for ALL of this.  Your preconceptions about nuclear energy.  The PSYCHOLOGY of disinformation that I just used to TAINT John Podesta.  The CYNICAL ability to find a way to turn a deficit into an asset.  AND for my skills in disinformation.   I learned from the MASTERS.  Including Yuri Bezmenov, who tried ALMOST VAINLY to warn the West how most of the KGB was devoted to DISINFORMATION – the science of lies and deception – and relatively little to actual espionage.

I have had to LEARN to dig though disinformation to figure out what is happening in this world.  WHY useful idiots but otherwise fairly intelligent conservatives like Mia Love (yes, she’s BLACK) are fooled by their sworn enemies……

……and why sharper conservatives with SOME experience as liberals, dupes, victims, or even radicals themselves, like former liberal Candace Owens (yes, she’s BLACK) are NOT FOOLED.

Note that I have stashed away actual PICTURES of those tweets, because there is a grave likelihood that TWITTER will ban Ms. Owens soon, deleting the PUBLIC knowledge of her Twitter history, and CBS may be in a bit of trouble, too, thus likely to edit their own Twitter history.  This is ALL part of the importance of INFORMATION and DISINFORMATION.

Other than the Bezmenov video above, I do not have time to educate all of you in the finer points of lies and disinformation in the service of socialism.  I should really call it communism, but I want to sound like an expert on Soviet disinformation, so I will use the term socialism as disinformation.  I’m even using Yuri Bezmenov’s accent in my head.  I sound a bit like Ilya Kuryakin.  This is quite fun, actually.

Where were we?  Ah, yes.  The REAL story on “Muh Russia”.  By the way, I’m generally sympathetic to Russia as a nation and people – on a variety of issues, and for a variety of reasons.  I’m actually a hardliner on Crimea being Russian, as it was, in my opinion, stolen from Russia and given to Ukraine in a corrupt process under the USSR.

None of that really matters here.  The fact is, I simply don’t like certain forms of socialism, because they are not faithful to the truth, and I’m very big on Truth.  You might even say I’m sworn in service to the spirit of Truth.  So I have to tell you the TRUTH about “Muh Russia”.

It is NOT what the Fake News has been telling you.

There is a truism about the Democrats that actually solves this entire mystery, if you DARE to fully believe it.  Like the idea that light has the same speed, no matter how fast you are moving with it, against it, or away from it – otherwise known as special relativity – it’s actually HARD to believe this idea about the Democrats.

Democrats accuse you of exactly what they are doing.

common expression

There is actually a strong parallel with relativity.  It has to do with WANTING things to be true, when they are not.

Most of us WANT to think that speeds add simply and times don’t change depending upon your speed – worse yet your acceleration.  We want a world where speeds combine in the simple linear manner of 2 + 2 = 4 and time A equals time B.

But Einstein finally accepted that speeds in this universe are BOUNDED, if the rule REALLY WAS that no speed could be greater than that of light – always constant – which in this case might be an arbitrary number like “6”. 

Thus, speeds of 2 + 2 are in a complicated fashion less than the expected number of “4” so that speeds are always totaling to less than the “maximum” number of six.  Einstein accepted the implications that nobody wanted to accept – that such simple additivity that we all feel intuitively, REALLY IS only true at low speeds.  If the maximum is 6, 2 + 2 is NOT 4, so that 4 + 4 is still less than 6.  And Einstein had the equations and predictions to prove it.

The disgust with relativity was profound.  The Nazis called it “Jewish science”, but they were not the only ones who didn’t like it.  Even as a CHILD, long after the the world had defeated the Nazis, I observed that AMERICANS both within and outside of science remained somewhat – one might even say properly – skeptical of general relativity and its fantastic predictions, which were even more bizarre than special relativity.

Relativity is weird shit.  It is HARD to accept.  It doesn’t FEEL GOOD unless you study the HELL out of it to FIND THE BEAUTY.

The truth of Democrat collusion with the Soviet Union, and later Russia, is weird shit, too.  It is HARD TO ACCEPT.  But there is also some beauty in it too, if you are willing to accept some odd ideas that go along with it.

First of all, it helps to be forgiving.  Collusion is not a crime.  Trump repeats this for a reason.  Only crimes are crimes.  If one colludes to commit a crime, that is one thing, but colluding to do “good things” only becomes criminal if the means stray outside the law.

Sadly, we may find some of that.  But not so much that we have to say “all Democrats are horrible communists and must be punished”.  Not at all.  In fact, I think the number of guilty will be surprisingly small, and their CRIMES will be clear.  They will not be ideological crimes.  They will be REAL crimes.  Most criminals will not even be prosecuted.  Don’t take my word for it.  Q said this.  So did FBIanon.  They didn’t say it so coldly and antithetically, or in so many words, but do the math.  It smacks of reality as well.

Back to “collusion”, which is not a crime per se.

The reasons that it is hard to accept Democrat-Russian collusion are as follows.  These speak very strongly to how the disinformation works.

  • We don’t want Trump-Russia collusion to be true.  The EASY way out of this accusation is to NOT make a similar accusation back against the Democrats.  This is PSYCHOLOGY.  Make it all GO AWAY by not saying that there is ANY collusion.
  • We don’t want Democrat-Russia collusion to be true.  It’s rather scary, in some ways.  The EASY way out of this reality is to say that their accusation of Russia-Trump collusion is “overblown” and “unreal”, which means the same for Democrat-Russia collusion.  This is PSYCHOLOGY.  Make it all GO AWAY.
  • We don’t want Russia to be the bad guy.  If Russia is still a bad guy, that means
    • America is alone
    • “NeverTrump” Russophobes are suddenly RIGHT (in some ways) about Russia
    • Trump’s odd coalition of Russophiles, war-weary, battered conservatives, Tea Party, fiscal bleeding-edge American renewal enthusiasts, anti-Bush-dynasty, Reagan retreads, and all the rest, might be threatened
    • We have to adjust our thinking in profound ways
    • Russia may not even be the bad guy, if it’s complicated
    • What about China?
    • “splodeyhead”

These are just SOME of the reasons we don’t want this stuff to be true. We don’t even want to think about this stuff.  Which, indeed, I have observed very strongly in Republicans and Trump supporters.  There has been a lot of awakening.  How much MORE is coming?

It gets bigger.  There are many implications.  Q uses “avalanche” terminology (D5) for a reason.  The whole thing is somewhat like the avalanche model.  We have reached a critical point, and there will be some slide.  But hopefully it will be managed properly

  • history books will have to be rewritten
  • fake news will be revealed for what it is
  • information flows will change in massive ways

If you’ve been paying any attention to “Q”, then you know this is true.  If you DENY “Q”, then you are going to be in for some surprises, and even shocks.  Sorry about that.

But NOW – for all of those NEGATIVES – there is one great ADVANTAGE to accepting them.

It SOLVES everything.  All the MYSTERIES of “Russiagate” / “Muh Russia” are solved.

And MUCH, MUCH MORE.  They don’t call it the “Great Awakening” for nothing.

The thing is, this Great Awakening changes relatively FEW of the facts.  What it DOES do is change our PERCEPTION of them.

SO – what I want you to do is BEAR WITH ME, and THINK IT POSSIBLE – just temporarily – that the maxim is correct:

Democrats accused Trump of doing exactly what they did.

What Democrats accused Trump of was colluding with Russia to win the election.

Therefore, we begin with:  Democrats colluded with Russia to win the election.

We begin with the key player who makes this all work.  John “Skippy” Podesta.

John “Skippy” Podesta had ONE of his email accounts hacked by Russia.  The emails appeared on Wikileaks.  I am absolutely, 100%, positive that Russia did it, just like Podesta and all the other Democrats are saying.  The reason I am sure is that the SCAM works best if Russia actually did it.

Yes, it also fits our little relativistic maxim rather nicely, but that’s begging the question.  Let’s look deeper.

There is no lie like the TRUTH misinterpreted.  That is the CORE of disinformation.  So let’s examine the truth – the FACTS – very closely.

I was never convinced that Podesta’s email hack was fully legitimate.  Something was wrong with it.   It was TOO clean.  And you are hearing this from one of the people who researched it VERY heavily.  I spent much time going through it, after it hit Wikileaks, and even for a while after it blew up into the semi-absurd “PizzaGate”.

Oh, now THAT was a beautiful disinformation operation as well.  Is PizzaGate real?  Is PizzaGate false?  I’ll say this – it’s COMPLICATED and that complication is very intentional.  But let’s not get distracted by ALL of the interesting disinformation goals that John “Skippy” Podesta achieved in this plot.  Back to the TRAIL.

For starters, there was no criminal content of ANY kind in the Podesta dump.  Nothing immediately criminal – not even anything that was really scandalous.  Oh, there was the “pizza map walnuts hotdogs” bullshit, but I can file that into TWO major possibilities – yeah, it’s real but worthless evidence, and – yeah, it’s crazy over-interpretation of NOTHING.  Even the “Scalia 186” / “wet works” stuff is NOTHING from the point of view of HARD EVIDENCE.  Even all the embarrassing reporter contacts – STILL NOTHING.  Even the weird E.T. stuff was INBOUND, not OUTBOUND.  I even found what I thought was a smoking gun on Vatican influence by Podesta via his crony companies, and it turns out that I had mixed up BUSINESS Tara with CHURCH Tara.  It was a NOTHINGBURGER.

Bottom line, there was nothing there.  It was clean.  TOO clean.

The fact that Podesta had protected his email account with a too-simple password is suspicious as hell, because it serves two disinformation objectives.  It says “I have nothing to hide”, and it says “I’m a dope”, which clearly he is not.  There is also the incident where his secretary opened some suspicious phishing email due to a miscommunication.  Supposedly the Russians got in THAT WAY, too.

Doesn’t matter to me.  I BELIEVE that the Russians did it.  But I also believe that this was part of John Podesta’s PLAN.  A very simple but effective plan, that worked for both the DNC and himself.

  • Insider compromise
  • Communication of natural targets and simple plan to Russia
  • Disinformation managed by Democrats

Now – I tried to tell people that I thought Podesta WANTED this email dump to happen, to frame Trump, but one of my most trusted opinions – a gal who goes by the online moniker of “wheatietoo“, felt that there WAS something nasty in those emails – a vague threat to “make an example of a suspected leaker” – who at that time everybody believed was Seth Rich.

This idea was everywhere, and had real mindshare.  Even Wikileaks helped promulgate this idea, as you can see in this tweet by Wikileaks.

However, there are HUGE problems with this email having ANY significance.

  • If we look at it rationally, it means absolutely nothing.  Even if there was a video of Podesta shooting Seth Rich in the streets of Washington, this email would be laughed out of court because firing a leaker or prosecuting a leaker or even taking away their parking privileges is well within its meaning to a reasonable jury.  This email is like all the rest of the dump.  Nothing.
  • This email was sent LONG before the DNC hack was even KNOWN, and quite possibly before the Russians had even entered the DNC system.
  • It is not talking about DNC hacks or leaks.  It is talking about Hillary campaign officials in the FUTURE speaking to the PRESS or otherwise blabbing.  So my vote is on parking privileges – maybe firing.
  • Don’t believe me?  Read the whole email:
  • https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36082#efmAGSAH-
  • Can you believe that Wikileaks is promoting disinformation?  Hmmmmmm.
  • Could Wikileaks be shilling for monetary support using Seth Rich?
  • Could Wikileaks be teasing and misleading?
  • Did Wikileaks know that Roger Stone was being misled?
  • Yes, it’s complicated, isn’t it?

What we did with this email was assigning our own meaning to a shiny object.

Now – isn’t that interesting.  A shiny object.  Podesta’s email hack – itself a shiny object – was literally just a bunch of shiny objects.

NOW – the trick here is to do the same thing we did earlier with accepting our starting point – which was an example of overcoming an Alinsky fear by ACCEPTING THE SCARY TRUTH.

Earlier, we accepted the scary proposition that the Democrats colluded with the Russians.  NOW let’s accept the scary idea that PODESTA FOOLED US ALL like utter chumps – like children – like idiots.  He left open an account full of shiny objects, the Russians hacked it as part of the plan, and we chased all the worthless shiny objects for a good part of the election.

We. Were. Idiots.

Accept it.  Accept the scary truth.

Why do we do this?  Because THAT is how we dig PAST the emotional blockade which EVERY scam uses to make you STOP DIGGING.  People don’t report scams because they were not just suckers, but GREEDY, STUPID SUCKERS.  It’s embarrassing.  EMBRACE IT.

So – we admit that we were LOOKING FOR DIRT,  FOUND NOTHING, and we were FOOLS.

So now I ask a few questions.  A few simple questions.

  • WHAT were they fooling us about?
  • WHY were they fooling us?
  • HOW did they fool us?

For every shiny object, we ask this question.

I won’t get into PizzaGate, and E.T., and all the rest.  I have excellent ideas in ALL those cases.  But in the case of “making an example of the suspected leaker”, I will point out certain things.

  • If this is MISDIRECTION, it leads us AWAY from a hack
  • If this is MISDIRECTION, it misleads that Podesta was not THINKING of a hack
  • If this is MISDIRECTION, it misleads that Podesta is angry about a leak, not a hack

NOW – this is where it gets interesting.  I am NOT saying that the DNC job was a leak, like so many Trump supporters WEAKLY contend.  I’m saying that this Podesta email was misdirection to pretend “no early knowledge” of the DNC hack on Podesta’s part.  I’m saying that the DNC job was a hack, and a hack by the Russians, exactly like the Democrats and Crowdstrike say.  And at earlier times, before the hacks, when John “Skippy” Podesta curated his hackable email address for HIS part of the Russian hacks, he made sure his email trove had no hints about hackers.  Or anything else, other than shiny objects that would not truly harm their side.

John “Skippy” Podesta was NOT thinking of hacks.  No, no, no, no, no.

Yeah, right.

Now – about the DNC hack.  Described HERE in the middle of 2016:

https://www.cnn.com/2016/06/21/politics/dnc-hack-russians-guccifer-claims/index.html

I’m saying it was almost exactly like the hack on Podesta – same thing – Russians – and I say this KNOWING that there is a fairly elegant but logically incomplete disproof of a hack, which I will now explain and correct, before the Democrats “miscorrect” it into nonsense.

A bunch of patriotic cyber and intelligence guys and gals on the RIGHT got together and showed, rather nicely, that the speeds of the file creation in the DNC hack indicate that the data was *compressed* (very important) locally and not over a network connection.  In other words, the data was compressed within hardware at the DNC, and THEN shipped wherever it went.  The files did not leave one location over a network and get compressed on the other end, in another location like, say, Russia.

For the life of me, I cannot figure out how anybody can think that this in any way disproves a hack.  A remote view hack of the DNC basically gives a hacker LOCAL CONTROL.  It’s almost like they are sitting right there in the room, except their monitor and keyboard are in – say – RUSSIA.  What hardware are they operating?  LOCAL hardware!  (Local to the DNC, that is.)  What are they doing?  Why, they’re compressing the files locally!  Just like a local person!  And all of it is utterly asynchronous to their display in, say, Russia.  (Which means there is no problem because of the distance.)

Now, the authors of this technically competent but criminally negligent proof (I mean that in the nicest way – these people are NOT good criminals) try to say that the evidence fits compression directly to a USB drive.  Logically, this is a bridge to far for me, because they know as well as I do that the data fits compression to almost ANY local hardware in the right configuration, and they are schmoozing the conclusion toward the suspected Seth Rich scenario, but WHAT THE HECK – let’s just allow the hackers to scour the network, find a USB drive, and perform the compression on THAT computer directly to THAT drive, then move the compressed files back to wherever they need to go and send them on to RUSSIA.   Then they GTHO.

This is NOT HARD.  This is incredibly easy.  This is a NORMAL REMOTE ACCESS HACK.  Now, I could get all “USB” on this theory, and have some colluding Democrat put the USB drive into the computer for the Russians, but OCCAM’S RAZOR says it was just a HACK and that is that.  Most likely, there was never a USB drive involved – just local hardware, as PROVEN.  The Russians hacked in – AS PLANNED – got the data – compressed it locally – got the data OUT – and LEFT.

So now we are left with a question – to which I already had the answer.  How did Seth Rich enter the picture?

The following tweet has now been deleted.

https://twitter.com/JaredBeck/status/946449203332567041

Here is a snapshot:

Seth Rich was a WITNESS in a LAWSUIT against the DNC for FRAUD.  The lawsuit was extremely bad for HILLARY CLINTON.  The case actually AROSE from the DNC hack, as an unfortunate (for Hillary) consequence of the fact that it was clear she cheated Bernie out of any chance of the nomination.  As Seth was a “Bernie bro”, the fact that he was called as a witness was NOT good for Hillary.  He was a liability.

Details HERE:

https://freedomoutpost.com/attorney-sued-dnc-fraud-claims-seth-rich-shawn-lucas-witnesses-case/

It is my contention that Seth Rich would be alive today if he had never been named as a witness in this case, or if the case had never been brought to court.  BUT – here is the thing.  I don’t really NEED this to be true, for Seth Rich’s death FOR ANY REASON to be useful to John “Skippy” Podesta.

Bill and Hillary Clinton are absolutely notorious for the fact that witnesses against them seem to have terrible luck prior to their testimony.  Exactly WHEN the bad stuff happens may vary, but it always happens before they testify, and usually long before.

But AS I SAID, I don’t need Seth Rich’s death to be anything but a lucky coincidence, and thus an AMAZING piece of potential disinformation.  ALL that DNC disinformation cadres needed to do was to plant the “Seth Rich / DNC / Wikileaks” meme in a few places on the right and voila!  It grew like CRABGRASS.

Of course, if Seth Rich actually WAS killed to prevent his testimony in the DNC FRAUD CASE (sounds like a big deal to me), then – well, will ya look at that – linking his death to SOMETHING ELSE would have MOTIVE.  Better yet, something that would be DENIED HALF-TRUTHFULLY by Democrats and SUPPORTED WRONGLY by Republicans and Trump supporters.

Does that sound like a good deal for Democrats?  Maybe even good enough to make sure to leave a shiny object email that might mislead people to it?

And in fact, you would have TWO SCANDALS cancelling each other out – PROTECTING each other.  Which is, you will learn, a wonderful principle of disinformation.

This whole thing is now a beautiful example of what I call “Eckert’s Law”.

When the cause of an operation is too advanced or too subtle to be detected by an adversary, Occam’s razor will point them to the most likely known potential cause, and this will be accepted and defended by them as the logical explanation.

Eckert’s Law

Disinformation will CHANGE what you think is the “simplest explanation” of something.  Therefore, disinformation can help you get the WRONG result from Occam’s razor.

Even better, psychologically constructed disinformation will make you WANT to accept it, like a DRUG, when the TRUTH is more painful, yet leads to a better place in the end.  So you will be tempted to CHEAT Occam’s razor by altering your own view of the world.

Are you starting to see it now?  Are you willing to accept the PAIN?

The PAIN of KNOWING?

Now – after all this possibility has been put in front of you – after this deep dive – come up for air.  Throw away all the complications that I’ve loosened, and ask yourself a simple question.

Who colludes with Russians?  The LEFT or the RIGHT?

What people are not seeing here is that the simple answer of today is the SAME simple answer that has always been true.  Democrats and Russians go back.  They have a long history helping each other.  Ignore the Fake News, pounding OVER and OVER with some counter-intuitive narrative about Trump and the Russians and how they wanted to help him beat the woman who gave them uranium at a STEAL and then covered it up. 

Good grief!  It’s crap!

If one of the two major parties is going to collude with the Russians, which one is it going to be? 

You always knew the answer.  It’s going to be the Democrats. 

How will they collude in an election?  Probably against the Republican candidate. 

How will the Russians get the opposition files on the Republican candidate to help the Democrats?  By hacking into the DNC and taking them, just like Crowdstrike found. 

How will the colluding parties deceive us?  By LIES, by DISINFORMATION, by accusing the other side of what they are doing, and by HOAXING.

Who does HOAXING?

DEMOCRATS.

We don’t have to change any of the facts.  We just have to change how we see them logically.  And in this case, we have to change how we see them, BACK TO REALITY.

THIS is the true nature of disinformation.

THIS is why they are – indeed – Fake News.

W

Hollywood.  Trust me – we know something about disinformation.

Darkness to Light: Eckert's Law

As I’ve said before in the VLWC series, we discover nothing new, but we do rediscover what has been hidden from us by time and craftier people.  Over and over, the truth is hidden and revealed.

Somewhere, a Soviet KGB analyst rediscovered this timeless principle, marveled at it, and filed it away for his next chapter in their manual.  Or maybe it was CIA.  Hard to tell the difference sometimes.

Today, I (re)name a timeless principle of disinformation not for a DISCOVERER, nor for a USER, but rather for a VICTIM.

Darkness to light.

This is actually a special case of a larger and more general principle involving Occam’s razor, which I am treating in a more extensive post.  But for now, this will do.  I marveled at this special case, awakened to the greater totality of 9/11, and why this operation was undoubtedly felt necessary by OUR adversary – those who plot treachery in the dark and war against God.

When the cause of an operation is too advanced or subtle to be detected by an adversary, Occam’s razor will point them to the most likely known potential cause, and this will be accepted and defended by them as the logical explanation.

Eckert’s Law

Happy Thanksgiving, Beverly.  Justice is served.

W

There is a tribe that would not take their money either, Beverly.  Only the tribes that value Truth over money truly begin to understand the Great Mystery.  Just as that tribe is to be respected, so is yours. -W

Caballywood

I’m going to make a list of four important points about Hollywood – (which was to a large extent ideologically molded by communist RUSSIA, and is now significantly owned by communist CHINA, although being uniquely developed by AMERICAN communists) – and elaborate on those four points for your interest.
Remember – this is from the viewpoint of somebody who has been substantially RED-PILLED by CUTTING THE CABLE (for two years), but who keeps his eye on Hollywood at a safe distance, and who has now been exposed to a small amount of current network TV over the broadcast channels.
My points:
1.  Hollywood’s main purpose is now POLITICAL REEDUCATION
2  Hollywood now reacts in REAL TIME to fight MAGA, patriotism, and conservatism
3.  Exposure to Hollywood products QUICKLY undoes red-pilling
4.  Satanists, following POWER, are now moving their influence to CHINA
I will address these in order.  Let’s go!

 
Moon_Landing

Hollywood’s main purpose is now POLITICAL REEDUCATION

 
One has to look no further than the “First Man” movie controversy, wherein the American lunar landing was “de-flagged” for globo-reasons, to see that the Hollywood leftists are more informed by their throbbing global hearts, than they are by even the most basic of historical truths.
The people who created “First Man” were clearly NOT educated back in the days before the Soviets and Chinese had taken over American education from the inside.  Back in the old days, BASIC FACTS MATTERED.  Nowadays, not so much.
Cuckish outfits like Red State may provide explain-away logic that says it’s all about the global ticket money (subtly implying that this makes it all OK), while HuffPo and Town Hall seem to accept the PR angle that it was about “being globally inclusive”, blah, blah, blah.  Economically OK or morally OK – take your pick of “OKs” and “well, that’s liberals for ya”.
Allow me to submit to you the proposition that our failure to push back on these edge cases is EXACTLY why we’re in our current MESS.
I WILL ADMIT (perhaps even proudly, from the “classic liberal” left ventricle of my periodically bleeding heart) that the very idea of Neil Armstrong’s immortal words “That’s one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind.” really WAS globalist in its intent.  Nothing wrong with that.  Profundity required it.  Realistically, every ENEMY of America helped put us there, when you think about it.
Why not be inclusive and humble?  The greatest significance WAS ultimately human.
True.  But  the SECONDARY message was deeply American, and it’s IMPORTANT.
I think that altering the most basic truths to make way for some people’s larger ideas is exactly why there is a revolution in America right now.  This kind of socialist thinking – this “social justice” thinking – where individual truths DIE for the greater “good” – is utterly destructive, unjust, and self-defeating.
Been there, done that, and nothing good comes from it.  It’s like a LOAN from the devil.  Buy now, pay later.  And PAY you will.
I would like to offer an alternative explanation, which I think is also PART OF THE TRUTH HERE.  I think the CHINESE MONEY IS SPEAKING ENGLISH.  And I think it’s saying “Take out the American flag.”  Nobody makes the social justice mistake better than the Chinese communists.
Marco Rubio’s gut negative reaction to the lunar flag dust-up, just like his gut reaction to the Confucius Institutes, comes (post bridge-collapse, for those who are REALLY paying attention) from his deep familial recognition that Communism was WAY more successful in infiltrating America than even the endlessly suspicious Cuban expat community realized.  Think about how insidious THAT has to be.
Even if this influence by Chinese money is people hearing the money themselves, and saying nothing, but making decisions accordingly, I think the prevalence of Chinese money in Hollywood is changing and limiting what Hollywood can and will do.  Hollywood can make things that are virulently anti-American, but it cannot make things that even trouble the sleep of a single Chinese censor.  Not without LOSING support from all sorts of places.
It doesn’t matter whether or not somebody said out loud “DO IT – REEDUCATE THEM!”  The fact is simple – we are not just watching our reeducation – we are PAYING FOR IT.
Get rid of it.  DO NOT GO TO HOLLYWOOD MOVIES.  If you have to, turn each one into a VICTORY for our side by deconstructing it and throwing the communist propaganda back at them in pieces, ready for public understanding.  If you have to see one, make sure 100 or 1000 people DON’T SEE IT.
FACTS MATTER.
 

 
FBI-TV-series-2018_1920x1440

Hollywood now reacts in REAL TIME to fight MAGA, patriotism, and conservatism

 
It looks like American justice is now being saved by a “conveniently widowed” woman who doesn’t need a lesbian plot-line [YET, I should say], and a marriage-quality tall/dark/handsome Muslim who complains along Democrat lines without sounding too complainy.
Don’t worry – there are other women in the show who can carry the lesbian torch, because the entire management seems to be women, some of whom are quite likable in that realistic “yeah, she’s a lesbian, but she seems like the only truly competent person around here” way.
Sounds like propaganda?  It is.  And THAT is before you figure out that not only are they attempting to save the “progressive gains” that constitute the Mueller FBI – they are even trying to save Andy McCabe, Jim Comey, and Robert Mueller THEMSELVES.  Oh, wait – that’s the same old FBI that WENT AFTER TRUMP.
I actually like the storytelling of the new “FBI” drama on CBS.  I admire it, and even allow myself to enjoy it.
But let me tell you – this show is absolutely LOADED with first-rate communist/globalist propaganda.  Watch this with even a modicum of skepticism, and the agenda comes tumbling out like it can’t WAIT to shed the body armor.
Demonization of the American military.  Promotion of the “crazy vet” exit lane – which is one of the MASTER STROKES of communist propaganda assault on our institutions.  Re-telling of history in left-friendly terms.  “Poor Muslim” at EVERY.  SINGLE.  OPPORTUNITY.  Oh, there is more.  MUCH MORE.
All of this from ONE EPISODE.
It’s not like there’s not a place for women and Muslims in the FBI.  But COME ON – the agenda here is just so THICK you can cut it with rolled eyes and face-palms.
The fact that such well-made propaganda could appear this quickly after James Comey, Andy McCabe, and Robert Mueller got into trouble for their CRIMES and BIAS – it should really shock you.  This one is very slick, attractive to people who voted for Trump, hijacks the “law and order” appeal of Republicans, and appeared just in time to start DEFENDING FBI CRIMINALS, with production values that put the old “FBI” to shame, even adjusted for advances in television over 50 years.
Hollywood is reacting to Trump, to re-educate you in WEEKS to MONTHS.  The FAKE NEWS may react immediately to counter narratives they don’t like, but Hollywood comes rushing in after that, ready to FIX YOU.
People – unless you are able to easily SPOT propaganda like this, I think it’s very important to AVOID WATCHING IT.
And I say that before my next point.

 

Outer Limits - Die unbekannte Dimension - Gehirnwäsche
Scene from “The Deprogrammers”, a fascinating Outer Limits episode providing a brilliant demonstration of the utility of controlled opposition.  Science lesson for today: Almost everything about our reality seems to be constructed based on principles of controlled opposition.

Exposure to Hollywood products QUICKLY undoes red-pilling

 
I have now been able to observe a BATTLE between the left’s best weaponized psychologists and YOURS TRULY, over the MIND of my WIFE.  Because I strenuously avoid propaganda opportunities for the left, it’s very hard if not impossible to get to me directly, although they do try (and it’s very funny and useful to watch that process, because it gives away a LOT of information).
Far easier to go through my wife, who provides them with certain irresistible opportunities.  I can watch those things and see how well they work, and – shockingly but not surprisingly – they work QUITE well.  The left is desperate – absolutely DESPERATE – to UNDO what Trump did.  They do NOT hide it.
I don’t want to give away TOO much about what works and what doesn’t, but I think it’s really critical for people to realize that “they” have made their PROPAGANDA extremely ENTERTAINING.  If you GIVE IN to the entertainment, they will CHANGE YOU without going through your REASON, your LOGIC, and your DISCERNMENT.
One who desires freedom must not only cut the cable, so as not to PAY for the poison, but may even have to cut the BROADCAST as well, so as not to get the poison for FREE.
Although I think it’s entirely possible to make this backfire.  Not that I would do such a thing.  Necessarily.  Oh, heck – it’s FUN to make it backfire! 😉
And now, a POPCORN moment from SCHADENFREUDE INDUSTRIES.

 
5th Annual amfAR Inspiration Gala Sao Paulo - Arrivals

Satanists, following POWER, are now moving their influence to CHINA

 
I have to be careful here.  I have a WONDERFUL WINDOW into the actions of satanists and pedophiles, and I REFUSE – absolutely REFUSE – to give it up or shut it down.  The best part about it is that I don’t have to go digging for it – once I figured out who was who, and how the influence works at non-binary levels (that is one of the big tools of CONSPIRACY THEORY, folks), I can just pick up a paper and watch them do their thing.  It’s like watching moles move through the yard at a depth of 1 inch.  They think they are hidden – they are NOT.  Q was absolutely right about SYMBOLS.
China is a golden opportunity for these nasty folks, and the nasty folks know it.  You think the MONEY WORSHIPERS fell for the China thing in a big way?  STAND BACK!  For people of a blood-thirsty and cruel mentality, CHINA is like the Wild West.  China and the ChiCom party may try to fend off (or invite in) the satanists, but a nation of body organ thieves and dyed-in-the-culture corruption CANNOT resist their seductive venom.  Sadly, the ChiComs are about to get the FULL ALINSKY, where they enjoy the “blessings of the dedication”, too.
These ChiCom party leaders are IDIOTS for throwing away the protection of religion, and most of all their independent Christians.  Germany did it (turning against their Jews, too – always a huge mistake), and BOOM – pretty soon branches of their military were wearing DEATH’S HEADS on their officer lapels.  It is very easy to let satanic forces and ideas slip in, and China is almost defenseless now.  Ban the open religions, and the hidden ones take over.
So, my “schadenfreude” here is definitely a bit phony and regretful.  We will likely be seeing China turn into the next Nazi Germany if they don’t deal with their satanist soon-to-be masters.  And, sadly, I don’t think Chinese pride will let them.  They underestimate what they are up against.  Even if they are certain the panda can toy with the asp.
Controlled opposition.  It’s BIDIRECTIONAL.  And it NEVER STOPS.

 
So there you have it.  My insights for the day.  The product of waking up on the RIGHT side of the bed.  Be careful what you watch.  You will, in part, become it.
W

james-coburn-2002
“Hollywood?  Yes.  I’ve heard of it.  Interesting place.”

 

Q vs. Reactive Disinformation

Before I get into the larger issue of Red October today, I want to focus attention on a small nugget of ADVANCED Q thinking and logic.  This will be a bit nerdy, and will twist a few undies, but it’s a good twist – maybe even a wedgie – of which some of the insufficiently critical autists are in dire need.
You will notice the featured image of this post is a meme purportedly showing shots fired from the LOWER FLOORS of the Mandalay Bay casino hotel in Las Vegas.  It took a while, but eventually (far too late, IMO) people figured out that these were just lights of various kinds.  But the damage was done.  An ENORMOUS amount of crowd investigation was wasted on chaff ideas and disinformation.
Why is this relevant?
It is my contention – and I think that many “autists” besides myself (is this info or disinfo? – watch language evolve) noticed this – that deployment of Q followed very soon on the heels of the Las Vegas DEEP STATE PROPAGANDA EVENT.
Let me hit you with a string of Questions to finish the argument.

  • What else [INTERNATIONAL] followed the Las Vegas Event?
  • Why is this relevant?
  • WHERE was this relevance located [MB32++] near the alleged site of the event [MB32] ?
  • WHY would somebody want to push a different location?
  • Was the target venue even visible from [MB4/MB10] lower floors? [NO]
  • Who might have checked this out? [W]
  • Who might have tried and FAILED to inject this truth into social media?
  • How and why did arguments then shift to MAINTAIN the deception?  [C_A?]
  • Who specializes in creating confusion after events? [JFK++]
  • Who noticed that disinformation was being re-crafted in real time? [W]
  • What did Health Ranger prove scientifically by audio analysis? [MB32 + ???]
  • Who worked furiously to discredit Health Ranger by influencing influencers?
  • Who realized social media comms were being used to craft new disinfo? [W++]
  • What is “reactive disinformation”?
  • How does one defeat “reactive disinformation”?
  • New comms?
  • Withholding details?
  • Questions, not answers?
  • Making people think again?
  • Things that add up to 17?

 
This is, in fact, one of the reasons I accept the VALIDITY of “Q” no matter what the origin, alleged origin, proven origin, disproven origin – WHATEVER.  Q is a valid counter to enemy disinformation, and particularly REACTIVE disinformation.  In my mind, Q is VALID MAGA no matter what.

Q earns faith so it gets faith.

 
Now – it’s time to bring this to Q’s recent posts.
Q is no longer just a counter to the enemy – it is a TARGET of the enemy.  The enemy is continuously trying to discredit Q.
One of the ways to do that, is to catch Q in a PINCH.
One particular pinch works like this – using DISINFORMATION:
Invalid disinformation is fed by “fingerprint-free” means to autists, so that they will believe it and seek endorsement by Q.
Q is then caught in a pinch:

  • Endorse, and give the enemy ways to DISCREDIT Q.
  • Fail to endorse, or disprove it, and DEMORALIZE autists.

This is particularly cunning, when the disinformation is SYMBOLICALLY TRUE but FACTUALLY FALSE.
Example:
Katz_Hillary
This picture appeared immediately before the “Dr. Ford assault” portion of the Kavanaugh SCOTUS hearings.  It alleges that the woman behind Hillary Clinton is Dr. Ford’s LAWYER, Debra Katz.  Many people saw this and retweeted it – even me.
Here is a picture of Debra Katz:
katz2
There is definitely a STRONG resemblance.  This is NOT hard to believe, either.  Debra Katz is in fact a HUGE backer of Hillary Clinton, and has surely been very close to her on numerous occasions.  One only has to check out a few links to see this truth.

Debra_Katz_Fundraiser
https://davidharrisjr.com/politics/christine-ford-attorney-debra-katz-was-a-hillary-fundraiser/
Fox_Kavanaugh_Katz
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/24/kavanaugh-accusers-enlist-high-powered-lawyers-dem-operatives.html
Broaddrick_Katz
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2018/09/23/juanita-broaddrick-sounds-off-on-debra-katz-co-for-supporting-hillary-plannin-n2521610

 
The problem?  The woman is not Debra Katz.  It’s Hillary’s PHOTOGRAPHER, Barbara Kinney.  In the picture, if one looks closely, one can see her both holding a flash/light meter/something and shouldering a bag of camera equipment.
And, to remove all doubt, here is a picture of Barbara Kinney, shouldering a bag the same way:
Barb_Kinney_belmont_stakes
One can go to her website, barbarakinney.com, and find other pictures of her that show the truth of the matter clearly.
NOW – we get back to Q.
Q posts a tweet which MAY or MAY NOT be from an authentic autist.  Remember – the picture is DISINFORMATION which is symbolically true, but factually false.
Here is the tweet:
Q_Post_2284_Tweet
The tweet is actually interesting.  If you read it assuming the first sentence is sarcasm, which is the way most people would read it, one is taken down the wrong path in terms of the details, but the right path in terms of the actual situation (that Hillary Clinton and Debra Katz are close).  But because it’s not actually true, and people on our side judge strongly on BASIC FACTUAL truth, this is a path to DISCREDIT those who pass it on – or get us to accept lies.
The fact is, there IS no collusion in the picture.  BUT there is collusion elsewhere, if you look for it, and that collusion is WAY WORSE than just a ride in the Scooby Van.
How does Q play it?  TWO MOVIES.  Both of which maximize the MAGA for two MAGA audiences.  Both of which maximize the greater truth which people get, IF they think for themselves.
Here is the Q post:
Q_Post_2284
What Q is doing here is taking disinformation and flinging the poo right back at the people who put it out for discreditation purposes.
Q does not actually endorse the (dis)information.  Instead, Q asks questions.  The READER can interpret them different ways, all of which make sense.
Are you AWAKE?
This is a good point.  If you accept the image at a symbolic level, you ARE more awake than most people, because you realize that Hillary and Katz are conspiring against the public.  If you realize that the image is factually incorrect, you are even MORE awake.  But if you realize it is BOTH symbolically correct AND factually misleading, AND can be used to discredit those on our side who pass it on, you are MOST awake.
The TRUTH is right in front of you.
Again – the image is the story.  Dig into it, and you FIND the truth.  The image is both true and false, and the TRUTH is devastating for Hillary, Katz, Feinstein and the Democrats.  The “error” of the photo actually PALES in comparison to the truth of the long-running, MONEY-BASED Katz-Clinton connection.  This is part of the logic of such disinformation, which tries to make us settle for CHUMP CHANGE (Debra Katz knows Hillary Clinton).  This is almost a Clinton SIGNATURE.  They use chaff scandal information – discrediting our side if possible – better than almost anybody.
Think for yourself.
That is exactly what I’m demonstrating here.  This is how we get SMARTER.  Don’t just “believe Q”.  Believe Q when Q says to THINK FOR YOURSELF.
Trust yourself.
The enemy has gotten us to not trust our own thinking.  NEVER turn back when you’re wrong.  Never distrust yourself.  Take the error, UNDERSTAND IT, and MOVE FORWARD with GREATER TRUTH.
Logical Thinking.
We MUST get logical thinking back.  It’s hard, it’s painful, and you will make a thousand logical errors on the way to one BIG TRUTH.  Suck it up.  We need LOGIC to WIN.
FAKE NEWS/HWOOD PUPPETS LOST CONTROL
This is the fundamental truth.  The enemy HIDES truth.  They LIE.  They spew disinformation to harm the innocent and the honest.  But they have already DISCREDITED THEMSELVES, and LOST CREDIBILITY.  That is why a NEW JOURNALISM – an HONEST JOURNALISM – reemerges.  That new journalism is US.
Cernovich_Media_Now
The best they can do is to try to DISCREDIT US by various means.
They will try.  And they will FAIL.

 

Do not give up on TRUTH.

THE TRUTH will not give up on you.

W

The Great Escape
W says take courage.  You are NOT alone.  I am not alone.  WE are not alone.  Q is showing us how to get where we need to be.  Q is going to help us regain our FREEDOM, and it is going to be WONDERFUL. YOU HAVE MORE THAN YOU KNOW.

Over The Target: Our First Site Hack

It’s great to know that we’re already bothering the other side.  Tonight – the first attack on this site, via the WordPress sidebar widgets.  These are people who know who I am, too – very interesting.  My guess is KGB-CIA, although Brits and ChiComs are likely, too.
Sadly, I may have to disable the sidebar, but we’ll see.  WordPress will need to be notified that they are vulnerable to some new hack, possibly via those sidebar widgets.
This is not the first time WordPress has been hacked.
WordPress_SQL_Hack
https://thehackernews.com/2017/06/wordpress-hacking-sql-injection.html
So far, what I have seen is only modification of the “followed blogs” list.  Somehow they are able to manipulate that list.  It’s very likely they can do more, but we’ll see.
Remember – SCREENSHOTS are your friend in dealing with these perps.  Sadly, I MISSED the very first one, so you’ll have to do with a description of that first image.

 
Here is what my sidebar blog and link lists should look like now.  This is close to what they looked like at the beginning of this story, after I added them.
WordPress_Hacked_0
Intitially, the “Blogroll” list looked a lot bigger – it was filled with what looked like “suggested” WordPress internal blogs from WordPress itself, explaining different options, services, etc.  I pared that down to what you see above.
The “Blogs I Follow” list looked just like above, but it was partially unfamiliar – I had forgotten about “BrotherWatch” and “The Daily Post”, which I believe I followed while tending my other blog, wolfmoon1776.wordpress.com.  but otherwise, THAT seemed normal.
A bit later, while working on the site, I noticed that the “Follow” list was now MUCH longer, and filled with MANY unfamiliar blogs.  I thought that maybe these were SUGGESTED blogs – or perhaps blogs I had at one time visited.  I thought that I MIGHT have visited one or two, but on looking at them more closely, they didn’t seem familiar at all.  And I was definitely NOT following them.
Then it struck me.  These blogs may have been used to support a PLAUSIBLE DOXXING PATH. They were not influence – these people are WELL beyond attempting influence at this point.  I think they want things to LOOK like influence while trying to find paths to discredit.
The other side knows exactly who I am.  They have worked very skillfully to try to degrade my effectiveness in various ways, both online and in real life.   At some point I’ll get into the details, but for now, let’s just stick to the hack.
Once I realized that I didn’t follow these blogs, and that they were likely a hack of some kind, I added a Sidebar Text Widget to explain that people would be seeing blogs I didn’t actually follow.  I was going to suggest it was a HACK.  But THEN, thinking best not to overreact, I cut back the explanation to just the following – saying that I didn’t follow all these blogs.
WordPress_Hacking_6
After I posted THAT, this is what my sidebar looked like:
WordPress_Hacked_0
Yes.  It was back to normal.  I had definitely been HACKED at some level.  It was possible that the hack was limited in some fashion.  SO – I opened up the Text Widget and changed it to THIS:
WordPress_Hacked_4
Well, THAT provoked THIS reaction from the hackers:
 
WordPress_Hacked_1
I made sure I took pictures, and then refreshed the browser.  Back to normal:
WordPress_Hacked_3
 
And guess what?  Just now, they’ve changed it BACK to the insult, while I’m in the process of editing this post.
WordPress_Hacking_7
THAT is a clue to the hack.  They do this stuff while I’m either working on the site, or adding a post.  Intercepted token, perhaps?  Oh, CIA!  You’re so CHINA!
So – the bottom line is that we’re over the target.  But I’ll probably remove the widget.
Say goodbye to our friends!  Stefan Halper, the architect of Watergate:
Fat_Bastard
Cankles – the architect of the attacks on Brett Kavanaugh:
Katz_Hillary
 
And CHINA, the architect of EVIL:
china-penalty
 
I keep telling these people to just leave me alone.  And EVERY TIME they fail to take my advice.  But – that’s OK.  It’s like Q says.
These people are….. yeah.
Win a penny.  Lose a buck.
PS – I think I just realized something even MORE damaging to the other side.  THIS is not just about me.  It’s a GENERAL HACK that they use to INFLUENCE people by making them believe that people who influence them follow other people who they don’t really follow.
Isn’t that an amazing social engineering hack?  They are using HACKED FOLLOW LISTS to deceive us about who follows who – who LOOKS to who.  Who RESPECTS who.
And you KNOW – you just KNOW – that the Facebook empire is using this technique to modify Americans OUT THE WAZOO.

I need to ask a question:  

HOW MUCH  HAVE THEY BEEN MODIFYING THE TREEHOUSE?
And another:
How do I know I’m seeing the same Treehouse everybody else is seeing?
Answer:
I don’t.  It will be interesting to see if WordPress fixes their follow lists.  Or not.

Interesting.

W

Coburn_Laughing
“And then he says ‘Yeah, but it’s a COPPER penny!'”

Post 2221

Q had a “Q&A” today, and one of the questions was – at least from my point of view – a bit unexpected.  OK – VERY unexpected.

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 98088e No.3094236
Anonymous ID: 5948d8 No.3093831
Q
Are we alone ?
Roswell ?
>>3093831
No.
Highest classification.
Consider the vastness of space.
Q

 
People are already asking a lot of questions about this, and one of the theories (which actually makes a lot of sense) is that it was simply a bandwidth test.  However, I think it may have also been a “believability test”, too.  Probably for a variety of reasons.
Anyway, on Twitter, there was some discussion of it, and I’d like to bring my thoughts here.  I’m not going to be too argumentative about them – this is all very speculative.  But still, I want people to see my thoughts, which are likely going to be tamped down BIG-TIME on Twitter.
For this reason, I’ll present it as IMAGES first, of each tweet, which can’t be removed by Twitter.  I’ll include the actual Tweets as an appendix.  People can click on those and go to them, if they are still there.

 
QETI1
Next, somebody responds with an earlier Q post on the topic.
QETI2
Somebody responded to THAT with a “Got it!”
QETI3
And THAT is where I jumped in.
My thoughts will be hidden on Twitter – nobody will see them.  That’s why I’m bringing them here – to share with people who can appreciate them.  Not necessarily agree.  Just something to think about.
Here we go.
QETI4
Hopefully that is clear.  To put it more bluntly, Q sometimes misleads extremely well – especially the other side, but doesn’t just outright lie.  I find it difficult to reconcile the idea that this is disinformation with Q’s normal style – particularly when science (in my opinion) agrees with the idea of pervasive life in the universe (which also, in my opinion, argues for God).
I then began expanding on that.
QETI5
Nevertheless, I do think it was a bandwidth test.
QETI6
Now I want to get into why Q’s final answer is even more convincing to me.  When you see “AO”, that is my abbreviation for “Alpha and Omega”.
QETI7
What I’m talking about there is an aspect of the “anthropic principle”, which basically says “isn’t it weird that the universe seems so suited for humans?”, and scaling it up to the “isn’t it weird that Star Trek is even possible?” level.
Many argue that the anthropic principle is a tautology anyway, and I certainly see that point.  However, if one simply accepts the idea that the universe we experience is optimized toward intelligence for the reason of the tautology, then it becomes highly predictive at the same time, and the more and more we see it borne out, the more it tends to argue for intelligence as a kind of first principle of the universe.
Hmmmm.  That sounds like something.  Some old thought of mankind.  Where is Descartes?  Wake him up – he would be interested in this stuff.
Anyway, now it’s time to think of how mind-blowing all of THAT really is.
QETI8
Great Awakening actually BEING a “great awakening”?  Wow.  Could be.
But now I don’t want to provoke arguments, so I’m going to let the people who are going pale in the face have an out.  Here is where that starts.
QETI9
Q has stated multiple times that “they” came to the chans for a reason.  Being “first to be able to believe” freaky stuff is very likely part of that.
Now I wrap up with the “WHEW” post.  “Hey there – don’t worry – maybe only a few believe me – I think that’s what they wanted.”
That will give people PROPER pause – easy to reject – easy to accept – your call.
QETI10
There you have it.  The moment I believed Q about aliens.  I was only believing what I already believed, but I believed that Q was telling me the truth.  I believe this may actually be the first moment of official public disclosure, so I took a picture.
W

JamesCoburncafescene
“I wonder if this was why…. her turn…. interesting.  I think there may be more to this story than what’s in this newspaper.”

PS – there is also – via YouTube – considerable DISINFORMATION about aliens. Because the YouTube Brin/Wojcicki Red Diaper Socialist Club targets me individually with certain types of disinformation via their product, and particularly about aliens, and because I’m aware of it, I have reconstructed the Hillary left’s agenda on that issue VERY clearly.  It is definitely Satanic and atheistic, which is a bit of a contradiction in terms, but it’s 100% Cabal.
The message is BAD HUMANS who DESERVE CONTROL.  BAD AMERICAN MILITARY which is EVIL and TRUMP.  We need GOOD SOCIALISM.
That is not the Q message.  THANK GOD.
 

APPENDIX I – Twitter Posts

https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1042609439579271170
 
https://twitter.com/Iron_Surfer/status/1042614631632527360
 

 

 

 

FIN