Tag: Snopes

Fact Checker Lies – Disproving Phony (and Possibly Planted) Evidence to Discredit The Whole

I have made it a minor hobby to study the Soviet methodology of “fact checkers”, who have raised political lying to a fine art. I even now use the word “snopesing” for one such technique, which I discussed long ago on my old personal blog.

Anatomy of a False Snopes Debunking

Today I was happy to discover a textbook Google/Snopes false debunking, yet also with some interesting new elaborations that made it…

https://wolfmoon1776.wordpress.com/2017/02/18/anatomy-of-a-false-snopes-debunking/

That post was actually a fun re-read right now. I encourage you to check it out. Snopes basically took a huge victory for our side, and reframed it as “untrue” by using a misleading strawman.

REALLY. Y’all are so obvious, Snopes. “Nopes, Snopes.”

Basically the “Snopes” technique amounts to “disproof of an adjacent strawman”. In that technique, a FALSE COPY of what is to be disproved, is either found or constructed and then disproved. The disproof is headlined OVER-BROADLY, so as to appear to show that the truth was “debunked”. It leaves the liars’ enemy – truth-tellers – babbling “Bu-bu-bu-but that’s not the actual case – THIS OTHER THING is the real story.” Maybe so, but the truth didn’t get out ahead of the LIARS – nor did it come back FAST and EFFECTIVELY, making the liars “bleed from their eyes like furies”. The technique puts the truth on DEFENSE, even in the case of a WIN, like the example I gave.

Today we look at something similar in principle but different in what is lied about, which involves disproving not a similar strawman scenario, but instead a conveniently accusatory piece of fake evidence, in such a way that it looks like the larger thing which was supported is what is disproved.

In the same way that we condensed the Snopes example to “disproof of an adjacent strawman”, we can call this one “disproof of false shilled evidence”.

One could likewise call today’s technique “disproof of Judas facts”.

Getting the “Judas facts” picked up by a MARK for the other side is KEY. I’ve watched this in action before, so I know what to look for.

Here is today’s example.

LINK: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/aug/08/viral-image/photo-claiming-massive-crowd-trumps-aug-5-wisconsi/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.ph/Y3l8s

This technique is actually a GREAT WAY of not just taking something down, but of negating something on its strongest point.

Allow me to explain how this works, from the Donkey Com perspective.

  • you are confronted with a Trump rally which was arranged fairly quickly, and was extremely well-attended. People are noticing. How do you get the Dem base not to notice that their peers are turning out for Trump, and to make sure they sneer at the NEXT Trump rally? How do you keep MAGA voters thinking THEY are a minority? How do you actually turn the facts around?
  • using different mechanisms and compartmentalization, you do the following
  • you have somebody tweet an even larger photo of a DIFFERENT rally, and have them claim it’s this rally. This is most likely a “fake MAGA” shill on Twitter. The best technique is to feed the fake photo to somebody like – OH – maybe a conservative commentator who is known to “borrow” and re-post photos without checking too closely. (This is a bit like “entrapment”, which we know the left never does.)
  • you request, call out, or perform a “fact check” on the photo, perhaps using a reliable “blue-check” on Twitter, or you feed it to your own “fact checkers” on Facebook
  • you “debunk the photo” in a misleading way, that makes it look like the Trump rally was actually small – not that one photo of it was too large and from a different rally
  • you make sure that the “mark” is sufficiently embarrassed and chooses to “go silent”, rather than to admit to the con job (which would enable crowdsource forensics) – then you go forward with the “fact check”

See how that works? It’s like a “debunking gun”.

Go back to the title above. What does it say?

Photo shows a “massive” crowd at a Trump rally in Wisconsin on Aug. 5, 2022.

What is next to the title?

So what EXACTLY is “false” here?

Now, the important MISTAKE that you are SUPPOSED to make here, when you don’t click the link, is to think that the Wisconsin Trump rally was not well-attended, and that “MAGA” had to resort to “fake pictures” to pretend that it was well-attended.

You’re supposed to put THAT fear-based or schadenfreude-gifting story into your brain, and just move on – don’t click on it. It’s PSYCHOLOGY.

The TRUTH is simply that the picture is of a DIFFERENT Trump rally, in Pensacola, Florida.

Here is the complete crux of the issue, which is admitted deep in the core of the “fact check”.

“But recent social media posts used an outdated photo to tout the size of the crowd.”

That’s it. It’s ALMOST the same “nothingburger” of BAD JOURNALISM that the left does all the time, and forgives itself for, routinely.

But don’t think I’m defending bad journalism – as you will see.

Thankfully, we can still see the DELETED TWEET where conservative talk show host Benny Johnson EXCITEDLY shared the image on Twitter.

BAD MOVE, BENNY. But good that somebody saved it.

LINK: https://www.truthorfiction.com/benny-johnsons-trumps-enthusiasm-is-bigger-than-in-2016-deleted-tweet/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.ph/ldRqq

This analysis is from “Truth or Fiction” – a MUCH better “fact checker” site. As you can see, they are “showing their work”, so we can do some forensics.

Ask yourself – do you really think this Benny Johnson would tweet an easily confirmed “wrong picture” of the event if he KNEW it was a bogus picture? No. He’s not that stupid. But he WAS as stupid as I have been, sometimes, and forwarded a picture from a “surely reliable source” that turned out not to have been reliable.

If you remember TEN-GOP, then you know how easily people can be fooled on sources.

In my opinion, after looking over Benny Johnson’s Twitter, and reading this tweet, I think he really believed he was forwarding a picture of the rally. THEN, he was embarrassed by his own lazy image “borrowing”, and lack of fact-checking. In my opinion, it is likely that he was the victim of a rather smart discreditation operation, and is NOT simply a bald-faced and stupid liar. Loath to admit that he grabbed somebody’s photo off the internet and assumed it was real without checking or doing BASIC JOURNALISM, he just deleted the tweet and moved on, cutting his losses.

Could have even been an intern, for all we know. If so, TRAINING is needed (ask Wray!!!).

SO – bad journalist or both a bald-faced liar and stupid as hell? I’m going with bad journalist. At least for now. This seems confirmed by the opinion that Benny Johnson rarely deletes stuff that offends leftist sensibilities.

Normally, things would end there. Dude made a mistake. But that’s not what the left wants.

They want an ISSUE that they can exploit for MILLIONS of impressions.

So what they do is take the error and REFRAME IT exactly as you see.

They likewise use this for clickbait elsewhere, as a “FEATURED FACT-CHECK”, on OTHER “fact checks”. That is, in fact (cough), how I found this one – while looking at a NASA conspiracy theory debunking (which STILL does not work for me, but that’s A DIFFERENT STORY with far more troubling implications).

FALSE. That’s it. FALSE.

But let’s call the left on this a little bit.

Why didn’t the “fact checkers” call this MOSTLY TRUE? Why didn’t they call it “PARTIALLY TRUE”? Why did they not, at the least, call it “SOMEWHAT TRUE”?

They would CERTAINLY do that for a Biden rally or an Obama rally – AM I RIGHT?

A picture from a DIFFERENT Biden rally with 24 people instead of 12? Would that not get a pass? Maybe 120 instead of 12?

Let me speak for them. They would have been more honest.

“So while the photo is NOT a photo of the Biden rally in question, it is in fact a photo of a different Biden rally, taken during the 2020 election campaign.”

MOSTLY TRUE.

Here is how “PolitiFact” takes their carefully misleading question and goes from there to calling a well-attended Trump rally “false”, while pretending to just be honing in on an evidence problem.

PolitiFact conducted a reverse image search of the photo and found Trump’s son, Eric Trump, shared it on Twitter in November 2020. At the time, he used the image of a large, apparently pro-Trump crowd to push the false claim that the presidential election was rigged.

Molly Beck, a reporter for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, quote-tweeted Johnson’s now-deleted tweet and said the photo in question was not from the Aug. 5 rally. She also pointed to Eric Trump’s tweet as the source of the photo.

The scene depicted in this older photo does not match photos shared by reporters who were on site at the Aug. 5 Wisconsin rally. Media photos show a smaller crowd and a different event layout.

In the older photo, two large screens that read, “The best is yet to come!” can be seen. This was a slogan often used by Donald Trump during his 2020 campaign.

Meanwhile, media photos from the recent rally show two screens displaying the event’s speakers, including Trump, as well as a large, blue sign that said, “Save America!”

Additionally, photos from reporters show there were three bleachers of roughly the same size behind the stage at the event. But in the 2020 campaign photo, there is one large set of bleachers in the center and two smaller sets to the left and right.

Our ruling

Social media posts shared a photo from Trump’s 2020 presidential campaign and claimed it was of an Aug. 5, 2022, rally in Wisconsin.

The photo in question does not show the Aug. 5 rally and can be traced back to a November 2020 tweet from Eric Trump. It also conflicts with several photos taken by reporters on site at the Aug. 5 Wisconsin rally.

We rate this claim False.

Whatever.

Conclusion

Now you know why it is IMPERATIVE to confirm materials from our sources. The left will ABUSE any error on our part.

AND – if it turns out that the source is suddenly dubious, you really need to DIG INTO the error, rather than running away.

BURN THE SOURCE TO GET TO THE TRUTH.

For me, the classic example of digging into a bogus meme and finding shocking truth was the ZIM shipping meme that Valerie brought here. I will not lie – Val brings an enormous amount of disinformation and CRAP here – but it was all worth it, to reset my thinking on how many of the elite skated on 9/11. She found some of the best circumstantial evidence, outside of convenient stock moves in the days preceding 9/11, that many top people knew the operation was coming. Whether these people were conspirators or just high-level would-be victims who got tipped, people knew the op was coming and did a GTFO.

Technically, the meme (which I cannot find now – it’s on Gab) was wrong on the length of ZIM’s lease at WTC, using waffly language to make 30 years of separate leases ending in a 10 year lease, into what was easily misconstrued as a 30-year lease. Likewise, it personified ZIM as the Rothschild family, who may or may not have been the controlling financial interest in the Israeli firm at the time. WHATEVER. Other than that, the meme was shockingly accurate in throwing 4 Suspicious Cats at ZIM’s ridiculously convenient and hasty move – despite a world of fact-checkers and “crusaders against antisemitism” waving their hands and saying “don’t look here”.

HA. The CHUTZPAH. It BURNS.

Closer to the current example, I watched a Breitbart journalist get set up with bogus information on Loretta Lynch – basically identifying the WRONG Loretta Lynch (a Clinton associate) as being Obama’s corrupt nomination to replace Eric Holder. This resulted in a defamatory article and a STEALTH RETRACTION BY BREITBART (“what article?”) – which was then (apparently) used to silence Breitbart completely on one of the most corrupt nominations in this nation’s history, since Loretta Lynch was a SORORITY SISTER of Eric Holder’s wife. Not a WORD followed on the REAL SCANDAL, after Breitbart was misled by SOMEBODY into publishing an ERROR.

Face the facts. CORRUPTION IS RAMPANT.

And they will say and do almost ANYTHING to cover it up.

We have ALWAYS got to be prepared for DISCREDITATION – but in my opinion, if you PUSH BACK on the discreditation and ADMIT YOUR ERROR – whatever it was – you automatically level up as a TRUTH WARRIOR. You will OFTEN find that the other side did something to entrap you.

Why?

Because WE value the truth and THEY do not.

PUT ON YOUR BELT, to hold up the PANTS OF CREDIBILITY.

Stick with the truth. No matter how unexpected, embarrassing, or unbelievable. At the same time, be BOLD in pointing out likely malfeasance, and MAKE THEM ANSWER OR RUN AWAY.

W

Was Bat Longevity Used To Rope In The Life Extension-Obsessed Tech Titans?

One of the really big shockers for me has been the relationship of the tech giants to the bat coronavirus researchers. What the heck is up with that?

Why did Zuckerberg and Chan (after COVID “struck”) fund Baric, who worked with “the bat woman” and Wuhan? It smells every bit like a “book deal” – an influence pay-off after the fact. This would lead me to believe that Zuck and Chan and Baric actually go back FURTHER, in ways that have not appeared yet.

Why did Google fund Daszak and a group that then funded Wuhan? This actually goes back. And then, Daszak trying to cover up HIS role in the cover-up of the Wuhan Institute of Virology connection – what’s up with THAT?

I don’t want to get into all that stuff too much, but I want to leave you some great links to show you this is REAL – this is not BS. The “fake news snopesing complex” is all over this, trying to hide it, but the word is OUT.

TECH and BAT RESEARCH are THICK.

References on tech / bat research monetary links

Here is the Zuckerberg-Chan “book deal payoff” to Baric’s lab.

Zuckerberg Group Funnels Six-Figures To Wuhan Lab Partner, Gain-Of-Function Advocate. https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/facebook-czi-funds-controversial-wuhan-researcher/

Here is the Google connection to Daszak and Wuhan.

Stunning Revelation: For Ten Years, Google Has Been Funding EcoHealth Alliance Who Participated In Deadly Bat Coronavirus Research In Wuhan China https://100percentfedup.com/stunning-revelation-for-ten-years-google-has-been-funding-ecohealth-alliance-who-participated-in-deadly-bat-coronavirus-research-in-wuhan-china/

This next link explaining the cover-up is amazing – its the “Climategate of Chimerican Bat Research”.

Who is Peter Daszak, the nonprofit exec who sent taxpayer money to Wuhan lab? https://nypost.com/2021/06/04/who-is-peter-daszak-exec-who-sent-taxpayer-money-to-wuhan-lab/

More Daszak cover-up, this time syncing up to Facebook, which ties the Google and Facebook scandals together.

Facebook’s CCP-Linked ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Now Censoring Stories Critical Of Zuckerberg-Funded Wuhan Lab Partners https://www.sgtreport.com/2021/06/facebooks-ccp-linked-fact-checker-is-now-censoring-stories-critical-of-zuckerberg-funded-wuhan-lab-partners/

Fauci reveals that Mark Zuckerberg offered him “resources and money” – this at the same time Zuck was using cash to interfere in the 2020 election on behalf of Democrats.

Fauci Lets Slip That Mark Zuckerberg Offered Him ‘Resources & Money’ In Redacted E-Mails https://thenationalpulse.com/news/fauci-reveals-what-was-redacted-in-his-zuckerberg-emails/

K. T. McFarland puts it in perspective.

‘The damage has been done and China got away with it’: Former Deputy National Security Adviser McFarland skewers media and ‘tech titans’ for dismissing Wuhan lab theory https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9640825/KT-McFarland-skewers-media-tech-titans-dismissing-Wuhan-lab-theory.html

So what are their motives?

Now, I had just heard about all of these monetary connections now being discovered, and thought that any relationship between the tech giants and these virus creeps had to be connected to the FAKE ELECTION PLOT.

BUT – as I was perusing the internet COVID literature, I encountered two scientific papers that made me realize something.

These tech tyrants may have had ANOTHER motive. A DEEPER and MORE PERSONAL motive.

Wanting to live forever – or at least LONGER.

And it gets BIGGER – as in all of society – as in FITNESS – as in EUGENICS.

And you know who THAT brings in.

This is the article that tipped me off.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147128/

mSphere. 2018 Sep-Oct; 3(5): e00397-18.Published online 2018 Sep 19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00397-18 PMCID: PMC6147128PMID: 30232167

Bats Are an Untapped System for Understanding Microbiome Evolution in Mammals

Melissa R. Ingala,a,b,cNancy B. Simmons,a,b and Susan L. Perkinsa,c,d

Here is the part of this paper that set off the alarms. I will make BOLD or underline the most important parts:

BAT MICROBES CAN SHED LIGHT ON DISEASE, IMMUNITY, AND LONGEVITY

Bats and their microbes are increasingly recognized as important components of zoonotic disease cycles (37, 38). A few studies have identified potentially pathogenic members of the excreted bat microbiome such as Bartonella spp. (39, 40) and Leptospira spp. (41). Bats are also known or suspected to be the reservoir of several viruses that are lethal to humans, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Ebola, and rabies viruses (42,–44), as well as of Plasmodium parasites closely related to those in rodents that are used as models to study malaria (45). Genomic insights have generated plausible explanations for how bats may have evolved to harbor such deadly microbes (e.g., reference 46), but in spite of abundant evidence that the microbiome interfaces directly with the host immune system (47, 48), there has not yet been an integrative study addressing whether microbial symbionts contribute to bats’ innate ability to act as pathogen reservoirs. As an additional axis of variation, bats which have flexible roosting habits can be found in close proximity to humans and may potentially swap microbes with humans and their companion animals (49). Bats may transfer microbes to livestock when they exist in close proximity (e.g., pigs consuming partially eaten fruits dropped by fruit bats [50]) or use the same habitats (e.g., horses coming into contact with bat droppings in pastures [51]). Studying bat microbiomes would therefore have obvious public health implications and could help to explain the epidemiology of emerging infectious diseases.

Similar avenues of research can also consider what impact, if any, the host microbiome has on susceptibility of bats to white nose syndrome (WNS), a frequently fatal cutaneous infection that has reduced hibernating bat populations by up to 90% in North America (52). Because not all individuals are killed by the infection, there may be selection on the skin microbiomes of surviving individuals to become enriched with antifungal bacteria. Indeed, one study discovered that in WNS-positive populations, the skin microbiome of bats was enriched with Rhodococcus and Pseudomonas spp., which are known to have antifungal activity (53). Additional studies in this area can answer the questions of how exactly these bacteria inhibit the growth of the causative agent of WNS and what enrichment of the microbiome with these bacteria might mean for the long-term survival of affected host populations.

Bat microbiomes can be used more generally to understand the links between the microbiome and the evolution of other phenomena of interest, such as immunity and longevity. To date, studies addressing the link between host aging and the microbiome in humans and lab animals have uncovered direct links between microbial metabolic products and life span of the host (54). Bats represent an exciting system in which to test for links between the microbiome and aging because they are exceptionally long-lived for a mammal of their size (55, 56). Mice are conventional model mammals, but the commonly used BALB/c mouse strain has a life span of about a year and half, making studies of longevity in these animals rather short-lived (57). Bats of comparable mass can achieve life spans of up to 40 years, and many are philopatric to particular roosts, making repeat sampling of individuals throughout their lifetimes possible (58, 59). Because these animals’ microbiomes can be sampled nonlethally, they are inherently attractive for such studies (36). However, it is worth noting that these animals are especially sensitive to disturbance during hibernation, so experimental designs should minimize unintended disturbance of roosts, particularly in areas where white nose syndrome has decimated bat populations (60). It may also be possible to keep bats in captive colonies in order to sample them throughout successive years of their lives. Recent evidence suggests that metabolites produced by gut microbes in bats might offset the oxidative damages incurred during active flight, resulting in downstream impacts on aging (61). However, many questions still remain. By what mechanism does the microbiome help to extend life span, and is this pattern consistent across mammals? How does interindividual variation impact the relationships between longevity and microbiome community structure? We believe that studies of bat microbiomes can help to answer these important questions and more.Go to:

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Bats represent an untapped resource for understanding microbiome evolution in mammals. Because of their exceptional diversity, longevity, and ecological importance, we believe that studies of their microbial symbionts will reveal exciting new roles for microbes in driving host evolution and fitness and may help us to better understand the dynamics of emerging zoonotic pathogens. We provide applications of bat microbiome research in the hopes that more researchers will realize the potential that this system has to offer. Multi-omics approaches can be used to parse apart the contributions of host genome, metagenome, and microbial metabolites to the processes described above, and as the costs of these methods continue to decrease, such studies will only become more feasible. The results of studying bat microbiomes using these approaches will undeniably advance the fields of host-microbe interactions, comparative physiology, and public health.

This then led me to a paper specifically about bats and longevity.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341951/

Cell Metab. 2020 Jul 7; 32(1): 31–43.Published online 2020 Jul 7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.013 PMCID: PMC7341951PMID: 32640245

The World Goes Bats: Living Longer and Tolerating Viruses

Vera Gorbunova,1,∗Andrei Seluanov,1 and Brian K. Kennedy2,3,4,∗∗

This paper is an absolute GOLD MINE of authoritative scientific optimism about life extension through bats, tying in IMMUNITY and INFLAMMATION. I cannot just pick out some part to highlight – the WHOLE THING is evidence of what people are thinking.

What I have done is grabbed the IMAGES which are the most quickly informing. Not all of them – just some of them. Plus a few selections of text which are equally useful.

Abstract

For centuries, people believed that bats possessed sinister powers. Bats are thought to be ancestral hosts to many deadly viruses affecting humans including Ebola, rabies, and most recently SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. However, bats themselves tolerate these viruses without ill effects. The second power that bats have is their longevity. Bats live much longer than similar-sized land mammals. Here we review how bats’ ability to control inflammation may be contributing to their longevity. The underlying mechanisms may hold clues to developing new treatments for age-related diseases. Now may be the time to use science to exploit the secret powers of bats for human benefit.

Keywords: Bats, Aging, Longevity, Inflammation, Inflammaging

Figure 1
Bats Live Longer Than Similar-Sized Land Mammals

(A) Major lineages of bats.

(B) Relationship between lifespan and body mass in mammals. Bats are indicated by red circles; all other species of mammals are indicated by black circles. The lifespan and body mass data are from Healy et al. (2014).

Treatments Based on Bat Strategies

Bats have evolved multiple mechanisms to suppress inflammation, in particular by dampening nucleic acid sensing pathways. A number of pharmacological interventions targeting nucleic acid sensing pathways had already been developed. Historically, the focus has been on developing activators of these pathways to serve as antiviral or anticancer drugs (reviewed in Vanpouille-Box et al., 2019). However, with the realization that inflammation contributes to a wide range of diseases from autoimmunity to age-related conditions, the interest has shifted to developing antagonists of nucleic acid sensors (Sheridan, 2019). This proved to be a challenging task due to high level of redundancy within nucleic acid sensing pathways and the danger of increasing vulnerability to infections. Here, the information obtained from the studies of bats can assist in drug discovery (Table 1 ).

Future Perspectives

In summary, besides serving as a source of deadly diseases and harboring viruses similar to SARS-CoV-2, which caused the current pandemics, bats have a lot to offer humanity by illuminating the pathways to develop novel therapeutics to treat age-related conditions and promote longevity. Already studies of the altered innate immune responses in bats point to several classes of small molecules, some of which have links to aging. However, we can only see the tip of the iceberg when it comes to understanding how bats deal with inflammation, and clearly more studies are warranted. This is also true for other hallmarks of aging, which are still minimally explored. In addition to finding small molecules targeting specific pathways that can be tested in humans, it will be of interest to engineer specific bat alterations in mice and determine whether this leads to enhanced lifespan and healthspan.

Bats have evolved skewed, and ultimately successful, strategies to experience longer and healthier lives, even if this is a secondary outcome of selection for responses to viral infections and/or the dramatic range of metabolic states that accompany periods of flight and torpor. Humans in the last century have created a lifestyle that has gone bats; we live in high densities and (many of us) travel extensively, enhancing exposure to and spread of pathogens. By embracing “batty” strategies to deal with the challenges that our new lifestyle presents, we may be able to solve what look to be the two biggest medical challenges of the 21st century: the rise of viral pandemics and the ever-increasing prevalence of chronic diseases that all share aging as their biggest risk factor.Go to:

Acknowledgments

This perspective was conceived when the authors were quarantined together for potential exposure to COVID-19. Research in authors’ laboratories is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, United States.

Where does this go?

OK? It really helps to skim through that SECOND article, because one can ALMOST see the stuff that would make these TECH TITANS DROOL.

Centuries more of life if we just got PARTIAL success in bringing over some “bat tech” to human life.

And I didn’t really dig here, either. This was just what was floating on TOP of the “bat longevity” literature.

Think how much “good” Zuckerberg, Brin, Gates and these others could do, in a few more centuries, if they just had the elixir vitae that bats seem to promise!

Those who don’t think this is a possible motivation, can look at my previous discussion of “life extension” in another article about the more “fictional” science of adrenochrome, wherein I discussed WHY it’s possible to sell a complete fiction like adrenochrome the drug to both CUSTOMERS and CRITICS. In that discussion, the interest of the tech titans in life extension is both mentioned and referenced.

The Adrenochrome Deception

The Truths, Lies, and Disinformation Surrounding a Mythical yet Very Real Substance There is nothing more intriguing than an enigmatic character who defies political and cultural boundaries to tell great truths, yet mixes in just enough lies, fakery, shiny objects, red herrings, exaggerations and omissions to make himself or herself economically viable solely on their …

In the process of this scientific and social examination of the mythical “adrenochrome”, I looked at the very real concept of “young blood”.

There is a REAL market for any REAL or merely RUMORED rejuvenation.

People will even inject themselves with a deadly POISON to look younger.

Yes. “Beautox” is real. And it “REALLY” works – to make people LOOK younger.

Oh, Mark Zuckerberg – you are looking MAAAAHRRRRVELOUS!

Now, I don’t know WHO or HOW – China or CIA or Obama or DARPA – but I suspect that LIFE EXTENSION is the HOBBY WITH BENEFITS of the elite. And BATS was a natural attractor.

So I suspect that this INFLUENCER – bat research as the path to the elixir vitae – was introduced into the RIGHT CIRCLES by people who understood influence. And HERE WE ARE.

W

PS:

How will China and their puppets study the success of their bioweapon here in the United States, and its effect on voting?

ON FITNESS AND LONGEVITY?

(S)he who controls the DATA controls the WORLD.

Spike Protein = Spike Protein ≈ Snake Protein

Using Principles of Protein Equivalence and Analogy as Predictive Tools for Coronavirus Understanding

Surely you’ve heard of the BROWN RECLUSE SPIDER.

The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that degrades animal tissues, and is responsible for the very distinctive giant-pock-mark-wound-forming symptoms of recluse bites. The brown recluse does not have as much of this protein in its venom as do some other recluses. The worst recluse, distributed over several countries in South America, has roughly ten times as much sphingomyelinase D as the North American brown recluse. Bites by THAT recluse not only result in deep wounds – they result in SYSTEMIC effects much more often than do bites of the “mere” brown recluse. Fatalities are much more common.

But just stop and think – THAT is how potent protein venoms can be. The tiny bite of a spider with a tiny bit of a protein in it – mere micrograms – can leave a 10-inch hole in the leg, with life-threatening systemic effects.

Snake venoms use different proteins from spiders in their venoms. Some spiders like the black widow have neurotoxic venoms, which affect nervous function, and some snakes like cobras have DIFFERENT neurotoxic venoms.

The honey badger is, weirdly, somewhat immune to the paralyzing neurotoxic cobra venom (jump to near the end of the video).

Many snakes have hemotoxic venoms, and THOSE venoms tend to cause cardiovascular problems. Interestingly, one of those problems is a somewhat rare clotting disorder called thrombocytopenia.

Thus, when I heard that this uncommon symptom was sometimes occurring as a coronavirus vaccine adverse effect, I suspected that there might be a protein cause – the spike protein – acting similarly to proteins in those hemotoxic snake venoms.

If that were the case, we should expect the same effect to be caused by COVID-19 itself, sometimes.

AND IT IS.

Should we just jump on such an analogy? One that is based on the ASSUMPTION that the spike protein is causing thrombocytopenia? Or at least similarly involved in the two cases?

Let’s think about this.

One of the things which is most fascinating about the BRANCH COVIDIANS – including the high clergy in government and media – is just how STRONGLY they tend to discourage alternative perspectives on COVID-19 – doing so in a way which is alarming even by the normal standards of narrative-setting and enforcement.

For example, at the very beginning, social media gatekeepers were needlessly hostile to Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell’s “high-altitude sickness” perspective on COVID-19 hypoxia, despite the fact that this led to a very beneficial new policy on keeping patients OFF vents, probably saving millions of lives, as well as giving us all a better understanding of HOW COVID-19 is and (more importantly) is NOT damaging lungs of patients.

Millions of lives. Think about it. Not a bad save – unless you want a guy named Trump GONE by any means necessary.

Now, some of these “different” perspectives can and do lead to non-working or just plain wrong theories at a micro-level, but so can ANY perspective. Dr. Kyle-Sidell’s ideas led to a variety of hemoglobin-related and malaria-related theories of COVID-19 which were neither fundamentally true nor useful, and which theories died on their own, without any need for censorship, but which were part of a questioning movement which also led to increased recognition of the endothelial nature of the coronavirus attack on patients’ lungs and other organs.

A CHANGE in perspective which WAS and IS fruitful.

Whether we are talking about damage to capillaries in the lungs, vein occlusions in the retina, or organ damage, particularly in the heart or kidneys, it appears that the cardiovascular endothelium is where COVID-19 does the most damage.

Comorbidities which already involve damage or potential damage to blood vessels – particularly diabetes and endocrine or cardiovascular diseases – are thus particularly dangerous, as SARS-CoV-2 and (presumably) its spike protein – which is what attacks cells – would be attacking an already weak point of failure.

LINK: https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/national/coronavirus/nearly-40-of-those-whove-died-from-covid-19-had-diabetes-ada-says

LINK: https://www.consumerreports.org/diabetes/why-diabetes-plus-covid-19-is-so-dangerous/

Now – let’s think carefully about IMMUNITY from both DISEASE and VACCINE. BOTH of them are mediated by immunological reaction to the SPIKE PROTEIN.

What should that tell us about VACCINE RISKS?

LINK: https://www.zdnet.com/article/prominent-security-expert-dan-kaminsky-passes-away-at-42/

LINK: https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2021/apr/16/actor-vivekhs-heart-attack-severe-not-related-to-covid-19-vaccination-hospital-2290710.html

I want to thank GrandmaInTexas for those two most recent examples of COVID vaccinations precipitating fatal outcomes in people with both diagnosed and undiagnosed comorbidities. For the record, Dan Kaminsky’s vaccine was undoubtedly either Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson+Johnson, while Actor Vivekh’s vaccine was Covaxin. The former 3 are all genetic vaccines – the latter is inactivated whole virus. All of them use the WHOLE spike protein in some form or another to trigger immunity.

Here is a handy principle which I call “spike protein equivalence”, as a special case of “vaccine immunological equivalence”.

If some affliction, condition, or mere FACTOR happens to be BAD for a potential victim of COVID-19 itself, then it’s also going to be bad for recipients of the vaccine. The difference is only that – most likely – in MOST cases – the vaccine constitutes a far lighter assault on the patient, than the disease itself.

THAT is the basic logic of vaccination. REDUCE THE RISK. But nonetheless, ACCEPT A RISK.

Do not kid yourself. The WHOLE POINT of vaccines is to entertain a lesser risk – a risk that is not as bad as the disease. The only question is “how less bad” does any particular vaccine happen to be. Based upon that information, one has INFORMED CONSENT.

People need to understand risks clearly in order to take those risks smartly.

Or NOT take them. Where the lyric “If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice” operates against the circling helicopters of COVID-19 and any successor viruses.

When we do not honestly face the risks and benefits of vaccines, we end up with the psychotic disconnect we now see, where people who SHOULD be voices of reason and trust – like the CDC – are LYING and losing half or more of the nation as trusting followers.

Rather than re-hash here how the CDC has lied to us already, or why the handy principles of “spike protein equivalence” and “snake protein analogy” work so well in understanding COVID disease and vaccine risks, let me give you links to my most recent discussions of the relevant thought.

The FIRST ONE is probably the most comprehensive, and helps to understand the rest.

Branch Covidians – Seven Ways To See Through The Phony Pharmageddon of COVID-19

PREFACE I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT. The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – …

Wolf’s Red-Hot Date With Retrotranscriptive Faucipox

Alternate Title: Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective? Gloating Pre-Preface There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought. Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY …

Johnson+Johnson Vaccine Follows Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca into Problem Territory, and Proves Once Again – Clinical Trials Have Limits

Every coronavirus vaccine so far has shown us SOME defect upon mass release, which was NOT evident in EVEN phase III clinical trials. Look HERE for a searchable PDF document of adverse effects from the Pfizer vaccine: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/977005/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf Check out these videos on the low-platelet clotting problem from the Oxford/Astrazeneca vaccine. Here is a fantastic …

Are Clotting Problems a General Minor Risk of COVID Vaccines?

I saw an excellent explanation of the clotting problem with the AstraZeneca vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 here: The doctor, Dr. ZDogg, MD, offers an exceptionally clear explanation of both what is going on with the AstraZeneca vaccine, and why its distribution was halted or limited in some places for some age groups of patients. …

I am not the only person who is seeing that the SPIKE PROTEIN and variants are interesting beasts. Cthulhu tipped me off to THESE TWO GEMS by Karl Denninger, which are extraordinarily worthwhile:

No Doctor, You’re Wrong

I Hate Being Right

Even though these deal primarily with spike protein equivalence rather than the snake protein analogy, the latter of which Cthulhu mentioned in his tip (he knew I would like these), there is some even more shocking perspective in the second link, in which Denninger simply asks – why did we use the WHOLE sequence of the spike protein which we received from China?

Beyond simple blame games, in which I could postulate that “whole spike protein vaccines” may have resulted from dumb psychology, or even malicious treachery by one or more parties, I can ALSO place Denninger’s question in the context of both failing to ask “Stoecker questions” about “should we base vaccines on the WHOLE spike protein?”, AND the idea that – intentionally or unintentionally – by whoever – we essentially fell into China’s version of the plot of Species…..

OR – if we don’t want to be all negative about things, try the Earth-saving genetic sequence reconstruction sub-plot of The Fifth Element, with a few more plot devices about process-skipping on the internal growth code, also a bit of a lesson.

Is such “gain of function” good or bad? One could view horsepox-based smallpox vaccine adoption as “gain of function” – a low-level example of the intelligent acceleration of evolution as a “natural” part of evolution itself.

As an aside, IMO the reason they use women for these scenes is ultimately the same reason the spike protein seems to target women’s physiology more than men’s, and that men are actually the first utilitarian sex robots, but – well – it’s so simple, it’s complicated. Patriarchy is both overrated and overstated, shall we just say.

ANYWAY, back to snakebite. “Cleopatra meets spike protein” – only worse.

I actually saved that whole report, which is not easily linked, as a series of images:

Before I go on, let me just say that immunology strikes me as a lot like quantum mechanics. If anybody says they truly understand it, it’s almost a sign that they don’t. Nevertheless, basic suspicions work like crazy in either field, which is, again, interesting. In either field, it doesn’t take a genius to see that – 99% of the time – a snake in the grass IS a snake in the grass.

Already, the entire Snopesian Empire is fired up over this case.

LINK: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/breastfeeding-baby-covid-vaccine/

SEEK anything related, and you will FIND – both WHEAT and CHAFF.

READ, and you will FIND – both INTERESTING and HOLLOW.

No matter how many guns they get working and belt-fed, cross-firing with their diversionary strawman arguments on this one case, the fact of the matter is that TTP is intimately linked to immune disorders, immune responses, and vaccination, so if it shows up, vaccines are and will remain the likeliest suspect NO MATTER WHAT. All Fauci’s horses and all Pfizer’s men are not going to get rid of the NOTABLY MANY cases of TTP , other thrombocytopenic clotting disorders, and clotting disorders in general, which are showing up in (1) COVID cases, (2) COVID recoverees, (3) vaccination adverse events, and (4) vaccination of recoverees in particular.

The relationship of TTP to vaccines and “malappropriate antibodies” in particular is UNDERSTOOD SCIENCE. This is not going away, despite the near-dogmatic narrative that “COVID vaccines do no harm” at the public level, reinforced by the narrative that “fighting vaccine hesitancy is worth LYING about adverse effects”.

No, it’s not.

Skip the following scientific review unless you feel nerdy. I recommend just skimming in either case. But I promise – the deeper you dig here, the more WHEAT you will find.

CLINICAL PLATELET DISORDERS| MAY 25, 2017

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Bérangère S. Joly , Paul Coppo , Agnès Veyradier

Blood (2017) 129 (21): 2836–2846.

https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-10-709857

TTP as a function of age of onset and mechanism for ADAMTS13 deficiency. The proportions of adulthood-/childhood-onset TTP and acquired/inherited TTP, respectively, presented in this figure were calculated from the data of the French Registry for TTP (840 patients).10,13  These data are in agreement with miscellaneous demographic data reported in the literature by other teams.3,5-9  The diagram shows 100 patients with TTP, each patient being represented by a symbol, either a square for patients with adulthood-onset TTP (91%) or a circle for patients with childhood-onset TTP (9%). Acquired TTP is presented in blue (94.5%), and inherited TTP (USS) in red (5.5%). Interestingly, the proportion of USS is very low (2.5%) in adulthood-onset TTP, whereas it is as high as 33% in childhood-onset USS.

Abstract

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare and life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, severe thrombocytopenia, and organ ischemia linked to disseminated microvascular platelet rich-thrombi. TTP is specifically related to a severe deficiency in ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 repeats, member 13), the specific von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease. ADAMTS13 deficiency is most frequently acquired via ADAMTS13 autoantibodies, but rarely, it is inherited via mutations of the ADAMTS13 gene. The first acute episode of TTP usually occurs during adulthood, with a predominant anti-ADAMTS13 autoimmune etiology. In rare cases, however, TTP begins as soon as childhood, with frequent inherited forms. TTP is ∼2-fold more frequent in women, and its outcome is characterized by a relapsing tendency. Rapid recognition of TTP is crucial to initiate appropriate treatment. The first-line therapy for acute TTP is based on daily therapeutic plasma exchange supplying deficient ADAMTS13, with or without steroids. Additional immune modulators targeting ADAMTS13 autoantibodies are mainly based on steroids and the humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. In refractory or unresponsive TTP, more intensive therapies including twice-daily plasma exchange; pulses of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, or cyclosporine A; or salvage splenectomy are considered. New drugs including N-acetylcysteine, bortezomib, recombinant ADAMTS13, and caplacizumab show promise in the management of TTP. Also, long-term follow-up of patients with TTP is crucial to identify the occurrence of other autoimmune diseases, to control relapses, and to evaluate psychophysical sequelae. Further development of both patients’ registries worldwide and innovative drugs is still needed to improve TTP management.

So what does TTP look like?

See those pictures? You may want to THINK TWICE about the coronavirus vaccine if you ALREADY have this risky potential outcome of either the disease or the vaccine. I have a link showing that TTP is a high risk in COVID recoverees who get any of the vaccines – I just can’t find it now.

We ARE seeing some public recognition of adverse effects now:

https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/what-to-know-about-the-rare-blood-clots-linked-with-the-j-and-j-vaccine

However, as is visible in this article, we are not seeing ANY contraindications to vaccination being admitted publicly. The advice tends to be “get vaccinated, and if you don’t die, but have bad symptoms, see your doctor.

“Sure, Dr. Stalin. Sure. Say – you don’t have any recommendations to PREVENT THIS from happening again to somebody else now, do you? Those would be called ‘contraindications’. Most drugs have them.”

However, I think some recognition is coming. And why is that? Well…..

In my previous post…..

Is The Abortion Vaccine Right For You?

“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …

…..we discussed other disorders – affecting reproductive health, you might say – that MAY or MAY NOT be mediated through the SAME or DIFFERENT activities of the spike protein.

THAT is an interesting question, actually. How economic is spike protein activity? How MUCH strategic information is carried, and at what density? How efficient ARE proteins at carrying smaller-molecular strategies into “genetic warfare”? We may not have those answers yet – and certainly not in PUBLIC SCIENCE – for some time.

Still, I think these questions will eventually be asked and answered, because the menstrual/gestational and clotting effects of the vaccines are so startling, that people are going to ask questions and get answers, whether the “mainstream” (meaning government/corporate) media wants to ask them or not, or to see them answered.

In that regard, we will carry on, asking questions and getting answers, carrying the principle of SPIKE PROTEIN EQUIVALENCE with us, as a handy and useful physiological tool.

The idea of SNAKE PROTEIN ANALOGY will become less of a medical utility, and more of a METAPHOR.

LINK: https://stephenwardeanderson.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-temptation-of-eve.html

There is a refreshing honesty and innocence in this guy’s work. But more than that, he just has a way of catching small details that everybody else misses, and making them beautifully prominent. His portraits of famous figures are quite wonderful in this way. He will completely drop many of the features of those people that I love and see prominently as part of my personal recognition algos, and yet childishly play up awesome things I never noticed.

And with that, let’s talk about Eve.

Our next installment is going to go BACK IN TIME, and show you something very startling about WHEN all this COVID vaccine technology was actually invented.

A lot earlier than anybody wants to admit publicly. Here is a hint.

W