Month: October 2026

Dear KMAG: 20261005 ❀ Wheatie Monday ❀ Open Topic | Did Obama and Brennan Abuse Early AI as an Illegal Hacking Tool?

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And yes, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get through it!

We will always remember Wheatie,

Pray for Trump,

Yet have fun,

and HOLD ON when things get crazy!

We will follow the RULES of civility that Wheatie left for us:

Wheatie’s Rules:

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

And while we engage in vigorous free speech, we will remember Wheatie’s advice on civility, non-violence, and site unity:

“We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

“Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

If this site gets shut down, please remember various ways to get back in touch with the rest of the gang:

Our beloved country is STILL under DIRECT THREATS by hostile forces – notably COMMUNISTS – and they’re HERE IN AMERICA.

Daily outrage and commie phuckery still abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Commies won’t win!

And we will keep saying COMMIES OUT until we get their FRAUD and INSANITY out of our country!

THE STUFF

President Barack Obama listens to the remarks of John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, his nominee for Director of the CIA, during the announcement in the East Room of the White House, Jan. 7, 2013. The President also announced former Senator Chuck Hagel, second from left, as his nominee for Secretary of Defense. Joining them are departing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, left. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Did Obama and Brennan Abuse Early AI as an Illegal Hacking Tool?

Do you remember what the Obama administration did to Sharyl Attkisson’s husband, planting classified documents on his computer when they were going after her? This was fairly early in the Obama first term, if I am recalling correctly.

Just as an aside, they likely had extra motive against her, due to her persistence on vaccines, IYKWIM.

But as to the title question, the point is that there were MANY allegations – and many with pretty good proof – that the Obama administration and the Holder DOJ in particular were quite loose with what they considered “justice” – and what Trump has since called weaponization of the Department of Justice.

Obama, in my opinion, was particularly cunning, in using the failure of the original Obamacare website to induce all of Silicon Valley to “help” him – and thereby to draw the most powerful C-level names in America into weaponizing tech against Obama’s political opponents.

I have been increasingly wise to Obama since I actually voted for him in 2008. You see, there was a little event called Sandy Hook, remarkable in its level of exploitation in its aftermath. From that post-aw-shucks-reelection moment in 2012, as I watched hundreds of actions by government officials and political operatives, some directed at ME, PERSONALLY, that can only be described as PSY-OP, I began to grow up politically.

Something was NOT RIGHT in the Obama administration.

I began to understand what is REALLY going on.

So – back to the big question.

There is an obscure “conspiracy theory” that always struck me as a bit too realistic. It is supported by the admissions of one of the conspirators, and in my opinion is now made very clear by what is NOW publicly known about artificial intelligence, as well as a little tool called “Stuxnet” – the level of technology of which, while short of modern AI, fits into the timeline of both AI development and the conspiracy theory very, very well.

The fact that a lady named Tulsi Gabbard has released absolute proof of another conspiracy called “Russia, Russia, Russia”, including a smoking gun against the two key players in the title, only adds to its believability.

Tulsi-Gabbard-FNC-1200x630
Tulsi-Gabbard-FNC-1200×630

You see, there were self-protecting stories from a hacker type named Dennis Montgomery, who claimed he had used some of the most cutting-edge hacking tools on the planet, in service of two guys named Barack Hussein Obama and John Brennan. This allegedly occurred during the time that Stuxnet was being developed – which was maybe 8 or 9 years before similar allegations of illegal hacking against Trump, BY government and allied forces, were made during the 2016 presidential election.

I remember when I first learned of the capabilities of Stuxnet, and how I marveled at the intelligence thereof.

Whether or not such highly advanced, highly automated tools can be legitimately called artificial intelligence really depends on WHEN the question is asked. Put another way, in the preface to Karen Hao’s book, Empire of AI…..

“It is said that to explain is to explain away. This maxim is nowhere so well-fulfilled as in the area of computer programming, especially in what is called heuristic programming and artificial intelligence. For in those realms, machines are made to behave in wondrous ways, often sufficient to dazzle even the most experienced observer. But once a particular program is unmasked, once its inner workings are explained in language sufficiently plain to induce understanding, its magic crumbles away; it is instead revealed as a mere collection of procedures, each quite comprehensible. The observer says to himself ‘I could have written that’. With that thought he moves the program in question from the shelf marked ‘intelligent,’ to that reserved for curios, fit to be discussed only with people less enlightened than he.”

-Joseph Weizenbaum, inventor of the first chatbot, 1966

The point I’m trying to make – which is in many ways a corollary of Weizenbaum’s quote, is that “future proves past” – in the words of the Q movement.

We now understand AI enough to know that old AI never seems that intelligent – but it does seem very REAL. And now that Stuxnet and the like seem like “old hat”, it’s much easier to believe that operations using such technology were quite real.

So, in many ways, I think Obama has a better understanding of AI than most people in tech give him credit for.

In my opinion, Obama is by now very familiar with Weizenbaum’s cited effect. Obama understands how understanding removes fear – but by the same token, how FEAR PREVENTS UNDERSTANDING.

Right now, Obama needs you to be afraid. My call to you is simple – FEAR NOT.

Fear is the mind-killer.

I have been aware of the same fears Obama is trying to instill in us, since not long after Dennis Montgomery says that he and his alleged associates were up to no good, using very smart software to break into banks, government institutions, credit card companies, and anywhere else with highly private information they desired. At that time, when I first understood the capabilities of Stuxnet, but had no experience with it, I sounded and felt a lot like everybody else right now, who is quite afraid of AI. I realized many potential dangers, and was afraid.

I now believe that others, who had access to that software, didn’t fear it. They mastered it, and used it, against people who didn’t even know it existed.

Think about what I’m saying. Research things – AI, Stuxnet, and Dennis Mongomery. Gain understanding. Use AI, and explain to yourself, or to others, but be careful not to explain away too much.

It took me a while to get over my fears of autonomous intelligent software, but I did.

AWARENESS and UNDERSTANDING were my tools to eliminate fear.

And one more. Above all, this tool.

God Bless you and yours!

Vaya con Dios!

W

References:

NONE. You have enough. In fact, you have more than you know.

And remember…….

Until victory, have faith!

And trust the big plan, too!

And as always….

ENJOY THE SHOW

W

Dear MAGA: 20261004 Open Topic

This Rejoice & Praise God Sunday Open Thread, with full respect to those who worship God on the Sabbath, is a place to reaffirm our worship of our Creator, our Father, our King Eternal.

It’s also a place to read, post, and discuss news that is worth knowing and sharing. Please post links to any news stories that you use as sources or quote from.

In the QTree, we’re a friendly and civil lot. We encourage free speech and the open exchange and civil discussion of different ideas. Topics aren’t constrained, and sound logic is highly encouraged, all built on a solid foundation of truth and established facts, and not by agenda-driven accusations and pronouncements.

We have a policy of mutual respect, shown by civility. Civility encourages discussions, promotes objectivity and rational thought in discourse, and camaraderie in the participants – characteristics we strive toward in our Q Tree community.

Please show respect and consideration for our fellow QTreepers. Before hitting the “post” button, please proofread your post and make sure your opinion addresses the issue only, and does not confront or denigrate the poster. Keep to the topic – avoid “you” and “your”. Here in The Q Tree, personal attacks, name-calling, ridicule, insults, baiting, and other conduct for which a penalty flag would be thrown are VERBOTEN.

In The Q Tree, we’re compatriots, sitting around the campfire, roasting hot dogs, making s’mores, and discussing, agreeing, and disagreeing about whatever interests us. This board will remain a home for those who seek respectful conversations.

Please also consider the Guidelines for posting and discussion printed here: 
https://www.theqtree.com/2019/01/01/dear-maga-open-topic-20190101/

On this day and every day –

God is in Control
. . . and His Grace is Sufficient, so . . .
Keep Looking Up

Hopefully, every Sunday, we can find something here that will build us up a little . . . give us a smile . . . and add some joy or peace, very much needed in all our lives.

“This day is holy to the Lord your God;
do not mourn nor weep.” . . .
“Go your way, eat the fat, drink the sweet,
and send portions to those for whom nothing is prepared;
for this day is holy to our Lord.
Do not sorrow,
for the joy of the Lord is your strength.”

The Blessing of Not Seeing

Jesus said to him, “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” (John 20:29)

The Advent story is filled with people who got to see Jesus face-to-face. Mary and Joseph, of course, were the first to set eyes on God in human flesh, to hold his hands, to kiss his feet. They were quickly joined by others. The shepherds arrived next: “Let us go over to Bethlehem and see,” they told one another (Luke 2:15). Simeon also saw the child—even held him in his arms (Luke 2:28). Anna saw him (Luke 2:36–38). The wise men saw him (Matt. 2:10–11). And those initial visitors were just a small fraction of the multitudes who would soon come to sit at the incarnate Savior’s feet.

We haven’t seen our Savior face-to-face. But Jesus says we are blessed.

We are those of whom Peter says, “Though you have not seen him, you love him” (1 Pet. 1:8), and who Paul says “walk by faith, not by sight” (2 Cor. 5:7). While the crowds in Jesus’s earthly lifetime often sought him for the dazzle of a miracle or the spectacle of a sign, we seek our unseen Savior by faith—a faith that could only come from his Spirit. If we haven’t seen and yet still believe, we can have confidence that he lives with us and is at work in us (cf. John 14:17). Truly, we are blessed.

The manger is empty, and the tomb is empty too. Ultimately, it would be foolish to look for Christ in either of those places. Instead, we turn the eyes of faith heavenward, “[seeking] the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God” (Col. 3:1). Do we want to see Jesus? We must seek him where he is. We approach him in worship, we seek him in prayer, and we gaze on him in his Word. We may not have made it to Bethlehem on that starry night, but Christ is nevertheless present with us by his Word and Spirit—particularly in the gathering of his church.

We may not have touched his swaddling clothes or heard his newborn cries, but we have everything we need to experience him. His voice resounds from a pulpit and a page, his eyes and ears and hands are on display in the weekly assembly of his beloved body.

And one day, just as he ascended, he will return. Writing from his lonely exile on Patmos, John encourages our hearts: “Behold, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him” (Rev. 1:7).

“Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!” (Rev. 22:20).

xthegospelcoalition.org/article/blessing-not-seeing/

Post about God – comments or articles
– whenever and wherever you desire.
FEAR NOT. God is with us,
because we make sure He is WELCOME.

At all times, remember. 
The QTree is a House of the Lord.
NEVER be afraid to speak His name.

Shalom! May God’s PEACE be upon this House.

2026-10-03, Simply Saturday

Administrivia.

Wheatie Wisdom.  If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.  No running with scissors.  No food fights.  AI stuff posted, requires a link. Please use spoiler, for longer posts. Wolf Speak.  No obnoxious behavior towards fellow QTreeper(s). Freedom of Speech is honored here QTree.  But Do Know, every poster, IS personally responsible for what they post. 

APMEX https://www.apmex.com   Bitcoin https://www.bitcoin.com/

Prices pulled last evening.  Gold $4,156.60  Silver $61.14   Bitcoin $84,600

Seems like such an obvious solution.

Elon blasted out the obvious…

Until we elect a conservative majority, we’ll…

Stuff…

OK so I was bouncing around YT and saw below video. Being a geezer, thought, what the hell…

  • Not in the market for a new vehicle until, I hope 2028.

15:13

—

Then I wondered, would geezer car insurance rates go down. So I asked Grok.

  • Yea, grok would have no conflict of interest here.

Grok

71yo driver. No accidents OR moving violations since 1975. Texarkana, TX. Typical insurance rates for a Tesla Y FSD?

Typical full-coverage rates for a Tesla Model Y in Texarkana, TX, for a 71-year-old with an exceptionally clean record (no accidents or moving violations since 1975) are roughly $180–$320 per month ($2,200–$3,800 per year), depending on exact coverage, deductibles, mileage, credit, and insurer. Liability-only is substantially lower. These are estimates based on 2025–2026 published averages and comparisons; actual quotes vary and require personalized shopping.

Key Benchmarks

  • Texas Model Y averages (full coverage, typical middle-aged clean-record driver, 100/300/100 limits + $500 deductibles): Around $4,169 per year / ~$347 per month. Liability-only (higher limits) averages closer to $1,495 per year. insurance.com
  • National Model Y full-coverage averages: Often $3,000–$4,600 per year (~$250–$380/month) for similar profiles, with some sources lower for safer/older drivers. insurance.com
  • Age effects: Rates for seniors in Texas rise modestly after ~65–70. A typical 70-year-old pays about 8% more than a 65-year-old for full coverage on an average vehicle (e.g., statewide senior full-coverage averages near $2,800–$3,000/year). Tesla premiums run higher due to vehicle value, battery/repair costs, and parts. Clean multi-decade records and mature-driver discounts help offset this. carinsurance.com
  • Texarkana specifically: Lower than major Texas metros (DFW/Houston averages for Model Y clean-record full coverage often $220–$400/month). Overall city auto averages for full coverage are frequently in the $170–$180/month range for typical cars—noticeably below the Texas statewide average—due to lower urban density/claim frequency. insurify.com

Tesla Insurance Advantage (Available in Texas)Tesla Insurance prices primarily on the vehicle’s Safety Score (and mileage/garaging) rather than age or credit score, which can benefit a very safe senior driver. It also offers an FSD (Supervised) usage benefit/discount in Texas (up to ~10% on eligible coverages for ≥50% of miles with FSD engaged; higher usage can produce larger effective savings in examples).

Example order-page estimates (Austin-area Model Y context, not Texarkana-specific): ~$205/month without heavy FSD use vs. ~$148/month with high FSD usage. Real rates depend on your Safety Score, ZIP, and coverage. High scores can produce competitive or lower-than-traditional rates.

Factors That Help or Hurt Your Rate

  • Helpful: 50+ years clean record, potential low annual mileage, mature/defensive driving course (common 5–10% discount for 55+ in Texas), multi-policy bundling, higher deductibles, Tesla’s advanced safety features, and strong Safety Score/FSD usage with Tesla Insurance.
  • Higher cost drivers: Newer/higher-trim Model Y, low deductibles, high mileage, urban ZIP nuances, or comprehensive coverage in hail-prone areas.
  • Company variation is large: In Texas Model Y data, full-coverage quotes have ranged widely (e.g., State Farm or Incline often lower; others substantially higher). USAA can be competitive if eligible. insurance.com

Practical AdviceShop quotes from Tesla Insurance, State Farm, GEICO, Progressive, Nationwide, local/independent agents, and others (or comparison sites). Provide your exact ZIP, model year/trim, desired limits/deductibles, annual mileage, and any other vehicles/homeowners policy. Complete a Texas-approved mature driver course if you haven’t recently. Rates are not guaranteed and change with market conditions, claims experience, and underwriting.These figures assume standard full coverage on a typical recent Model Y; liability-only or higher/lower limits will differ materially. Get multiple personalized quotes for the most accurate picture.

Me. Interesting it appears some insurance company rates go down with increased FSD engaged. Minor plug for Tesla insurance. 🙂

Maintenance appears to be minimal, as compared to ICE.

EVs still have a ways to go.

Are EV fires still an issue OR was that mainly non-Tesla EV fires for the most part. Based on Grok search, does not appear to be a significant issue. I spose, keep the Tesla out of water and hope it doesn’t catch on fire for any reason.

Cold weather issues. Charge time. Charge limits. Increase charge drain. Long distance travel on holidays likely long wait times to charge EVs.

Then I looked at Tesla weight Vs my Ram and Grand Cherokee L. Ram 25% heavier. Grand Cherokee L about the same. So much for the EVs are too heavy hype.

Tire prices comparable to what I buy these days. Maintenance appears to be much less than ICE.

Charging station availability on demand, likely my biggest concern. 2028 charging station availability may not be an issue.

So much for the Tesla rabbit hole deep dive of sorts.

—

This looks interesting.

Elon Musk Makes A Move On The Banks

When Elon Musk took over Twitter, fired four out of five employees, and rebranded it X (just because he thought it sounded cool), the talking heads predicted doom for the company. The opposite happened. It is now one of the most popular sources of news in the world, and a major delivery system for what social media is supposed to be.

He always had more in mind. He explained at the outset that he wanted to turn X into the “everything app.” I winced when I heard those words. As someone who worked in web development for years, I learned to regard every promise of a “one-stop shop” to be foolish. It never happens. Best to pick one thing you do well and stick with it.

To my own amazement, X is indeed taking steps toward being the Everything App. Not yet, of course, but the advent of his X Money platform is major and serious. It is being rolled out gradually to premium members. Under the new content-creators payout program, people are paid within the app and invited to use the service for transferring money.

Described thusly, it would seem to be another version of Zelle or Venmo and therefore not that much to notice, much less celebrate. But when you look at the details of what X Money is doing, another reality emerges. It would appear that this app is making a move on the banks themselves.

The evidence is on the app now. It offers a way to link your paycheck to X Money to enjoy a quicker payout than if your paycheck flows to your bank account. Speed is one thing, and a good thing, but why else would you do this?

The key comes in the details which have not been advertised (Musk doesn’t like old-style marketing). These are not regular dormant cash accounts like you get in a regular checking account. They pay a return. Not just any return. The return is higher than you would otherwise get in a normal money market.

For now the Annual Percent Yield (APY) is an eye-popping 6 percent as an initial customer-acquisition rate.

Not only that, the X Money card that comes digitally with the service (and physically on the ask) offers fully 3 percent cash back.

A high rate plus instant peer-to-peer transmission, a metal Visa card with 3 percent cash back, and early direct deposit is meant to pull balances and daily activity onto the platform.

What you notice from these terms is that this goes way beyond a mere money-transmission service. What’s being provided here, with quick and easy signups, is a highly lucrative vehicle for serious investment. Put your cash in and have it earn 6 percent. That beats inflation. With 3 percent cash back, you are way ahead of the game. That is reason enough to switch.

As a user I immediately found myself in a bind. Initially I thought I would enjoy spending my X Money on groceries and movie tickets or something along those lines. But with this level of earning power, I will lose money if I do that. I would be forgoing the return from the money held. Better to use the cash in my bank or my credit card that also pays 3 percent cash back.

The calculation here favors keeping the money in X Money, not spending it. Indeed, the calculator favors moving cash from banks into X Money and earning the return. To be sure, that 6 percent could change in a year or two or three. It would be up to how the app is managed.

Meanwhile, do you understand what this means? It means an actual reward for … saving money! Imagine that. Cash that earns a return on an app that allows peer-to-peer transfer at zero cost. This is disruptive innovation of the sort we’ve come to expect from this man and his companies.

Elon has designated the X Money app for now to be a loss leader in direct revenue but a huge investment in becoming what he likely thinks it can be in the long run: an actual option to the banks.

There might even be more afoot here. The banking rails themselves are provided by Cross River Bank. Founded in 2008, the bank carved out a special niche in working with new digital companies that focus on in-app service provision and edgier products like cryptocurrency. It is FDIC-insured but eschews traditional banking in favor of innovation. Even with its smaller capitalization, it is an ideal partner for a disruptive technology like X Money.

Recall too that Elon Musk was one of the founders of PayPal. It was started with a high hope of developing a new form of money transmission and even a new form of money. It eventually found itself regulated out of that vision to become what it is today, which is a highly valued means of payment for the digital age.

X Money seems to learn from mistakes made in those days to build out fully banking services from the very foundation. With the inclusion of crypto as part of the banking rails, we can easily imagine a future in which X Money integrates with a service like Coinbase to move money from dollars to crypto and back again.

One thing that is notable to me is the effortlessness of the signups and verifications. The developers have learned that customers recoil at too many screens, too much language, too many aggressive demands for passwords and accounts. They are using the latest technology to make signups and management extremely easy and clean.

That said, X Money does of course comply with all the arduous federal regulations concerning Know Your Customer laws and tax-reporting requirements. This is by no means an app that places a premium on your privacy. Even to make it work requires government IDs and 3D facial scans from our phone. I despise all of that while also understanding that this is the price any financial entrepreneur pays to make anything innovative these days. X Money is compliant across the board, which, from my point of view, is unavoidably regrettable.

It’s entirely possible that Elon has a big vision for this platform that he has not yet shared. Indeed, I’m struck by how much of the system that he has built so far has not been advertised at all. It’s extremely interesting how the rollout is going. The app presents direct information to the customer screen by screen, the pitch, the conditions, the advantages. Normal advertising speaks to the masses; Elon’s way is to speak to the individual user. It’s very different.

We can imagine two polar opposite futures with this new service.

Optimistically, it becomes the innovator of a new form of money and monetary services that eventually replaces paper money and even the dollar.

Remember that the app is global. What if the assets of X and other companies emerge as the asset baking of a new form of currency?

Pessimistically, X Money becomes just another new layer of the emergent financial control grid that spies on us and even worse: the integration of money and social media reminds one of China’s Social Credit System. This future sometimes feels baked into the technologies we use and the deep relationship of tech companies and the government.

Which will it be? We do not know. But from what I can see, there is a strong rationale for expecting this platform to be a major player and going concern in the future world of money and finance.

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/elon-musk-makes-move-banks

—

Have a laugh…

1:02

—

Worthy rerun. Hilarious back and forth between 84yo guy and traffic judge.

Yes. It was posted late last Saturday evening. Still funny.

2:48

—

Grateful our ancestors broke the British chains, again, and again…

Thankfully, Trump is finishing off the Brits, Canucks… Along with NATO. Ideally UN.

—

Charlie called out the islami cancer…

—

Stay The Course. Trust Trump. Remember…

Never, Ever, forget what they did to us.

Celebrate America, Everyday!!!

Relax, It’s Saturday.

Night crew, your nickel.

KK

Health Friday 10.2.2026 Open Thread: NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part One

The image of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) for today’s offering header is courtesy of Wikipedia.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated item in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part One

Yours Truly has written many times regarding the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, BNT162b2 (now COMIRNATY, by Pfizer-BioNTech); and, mRNA-1273 (SPIKEVAX) and mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE), by Moderna. Today’s offering concerns NUVAXOVID, the mRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” by Novavax. One will state at the outset that NUVAXOVID is not a “safer” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.” In Yours Truly’s opinion, there IS NO “SAFE” or “SAFER” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” — no matter what “delivery platform technology” is used. This includes modRNA-based, mRNA-based, saRNA-based, “protein subunit” based, “inactivated”, or any other platform technology. Any COVID-19 “vaccine” that is based on the SARS-CoV-2 virus (no matter if the entire spike protein is used, or part of the spike protein is used, in the product). Why? Because of the following, among other reasons: First, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein itself, which was developed to invade the lungs and to attack the ACE2 receptors of the body (in the heart, intestines, and kidney, among other locations); and, Second, the other ingredients that these “vaccines” contain, among them: dangerous nanoparticles (ALC-0159; ALC-0315; SM-102); N1-methylpseudouridine; antibiotics; detergents; SV40; “loose” DNA fragments; — and, in the case of NUVAXOVID, insect matter from an invasive crop destroyer insect. By the way, NUVAXOVID utilizes the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 — and has deletions / alterations that were introduced into it — thus making this “vaccine” a modRNA-based injectable.

Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) is found all over the globe. This pest, swarming in large numbers and eating every part of the crop, can destroy entire fields of, for example, corn, in days. Please see: https://www.sygenta.com/agriculture/crop-production/pest-disease-management/billion-dollar-problem, “A billion dollar problem”, August 2024. A screenshot from this article is below:

The “culturing bath” for the modRNA mixture used in NUVAXOVID is lab-created from elements derived from Spodoptera frugiperda. This, in itself, in Yours Truly’s opinion, makes the final product suspect from the start. Such a “culturing bath” has its own potential risks and issues. Such a “culturing bath” is NOT “safer” or “better” than the E. coli-derived ones used by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna for their COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” products.

Yours Truly now turns to the FDA-issued Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID: https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines,blood&biologics/published/Package-Insert-and-Patient-Package-Insert-NUVAXOVID.pdf. The healthcare providers Package Insert will be discussed first. Please see the following screenshots from this document. Note the admission, in section 5.2, that this “vaccine” can cause myocarditis / pericarditis; the dismissive language in section 6.2; the “potential benefits outweigh the potential risk”-type of argument in section 8.2; and the enormous amount of “adjuvant” used per injection of NUVAXOVID, compared to the amount of modRNA per injection:

Also: Pages 11 – 14 et seq. in the healthcare provider Package Insert — the Adverse Reactions sections — consistently has clearly dismissive language regarding adverse reactions reported as being “not causative.”

So far, what we see from the healthcare provider Package Insert is: that NUVAXOVID can cause heart issues; that postmarketing “vaccine”-induced issues can be dismissed under “not sufficient causal relationship” to having taken the “vaccine”; that, apparently, no animal (non-human) studies were performed to investigate whether or not NUVAXOVID elements are excreted in breast milk; that the “potential benefits outweigh potential risks” canard regarding taking COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” somehow applies to human lactation; and, that the ** published ** ingredients list of NUVAXOVID reads like a “laundry list” of chemicals plus a dose of crop-destroying insect residue plus a hefty dose of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

Let’s look at some of the ingredients listed in section 11 DESCRIPTION of this “vaccine”: One: the “rS” spike protein used in NUVAXOVID is the full-length S protein; and, the “vaccine” attacks both the B-lymphocyte and the T-lymphocyte immune mechanisms. Please see: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8897963/, “Editorial: First Approval of the Protein-Based Adjuvanted Nuvaxovid (NVX-CoV2373) Novavax Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 Could Increase Vaccine Uptake and Provide Immune Protection from Viral Variants”, Dinah V. Parums, MD, PhD, March 2022. Two: the lab-creation of the Sf9 Spodoptera frugiperda insect cell line used for the “culturing bath” for NUVAXOVID apparently only requires a BSL-1 laboratory level (thus making the process of culturing insect cell lines for use in “vaccines” faster and cheaper.) Please see: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392062088_The_Bioengineering_of_Insect_Cell_Lines_for_Biotherapeutics_and_Vaccine_Production_An_Updated_Review, Michal Sulek, Angieszka Szuster-Ciesielska, May 2025. (The title of the paper is the same as the URL.) Three: a few of the other ingredients in NUVAXOVID: potassium dihydrogen phosphate, a potassium salt that is used in fertilizer (https://pubchem.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/compound/Monobasic-potassium-phosphate); and, disodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate, a chemical compound that is not for food or drug use: https://www.biosynth.com/Files/MSDS/FS/32/MSDS_FS32721_7000_EN.pdf; see section 1; and, polysorbate 80, a surfactant (a type of detergent) used in soaps and cosmetics.

Adding these into the summary of what NUVAXOVID contains, we now have, citing only the items above: The full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein + residue from the “culturing bath” that is lab-created from the Sf9 elements of the Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) + a potassium salt that is used in fertilizer + a chemical compound that is not to be used in food or drugs + a detergent. Then, there is the “Matrix-M” adjuvant used in this “vaccine”, made of “Fraction A” and “Fraction C” from the soapbark tree (Quillaja saponaria Molina.) Matrix-M is the largest amount of any ingredient in NUVAXOVID — 50mcg in the injection. Please see: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/drug-delivery/articles/10.3389/fddev.2023.1279710/full, “Biodistribution of the saponin-based adjuvant Matrix-M (TM) following intramuscular injection in mice”, Cecilia Carnrot, et al., 5 November 2023. Note: every author of this paper is affiliated with Novavax AB (Sweden), or with Novavax Inc., Gaithersburg, MD. An image of Figure 3 (biodistribution) of this paper is below. Apologies for the length of the image:

Note the accumulations of the Matrix-M adjuvant COMBINED WITH THE SARS-CoV-2 SPIKE PROTEIN (the dark blue dots on the above image) in areas of the body. Note that NUVAXOVID crosses the Blood-Brain Barrier and enters the brain. Note that many of the accumulations INCREASE over the timeframe biodistribution period.

Let’s look at the Information for Patients and Caregivers section of the FDA Package Insert, which begins on Page 44 of the document. Yours Truly is including two images from this section of the Package Insert:

Note the FDA “bafflegab” regarding the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in NUVAXOVID. The “vaccine” is BASED ON THE SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS. The “XFG variant”, which is the “official” SARS-CoV-2 variant used in the “vaccine”, IS “DESCENDED” FROM THE ORIGINAL WUHAN HU1 SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS VIA THE OMICRON LINEAGE. The FDA “bafflegab” is like saying, for example, “Well, I don’t have any German blood in me, since my German ancestors came to the United States 150 years ago.” Of course the DNA of one’s ancestors is present in the bloodline, even if in smaller amounts. And, note the complete lack of information regarding the “other ingredients” listed for NUVAXOVID. Unless the patient / caregiver looks up information on the chemicals listed, they won’t know, for example, that disodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate is not for food or drug use (see above in today’s offering.) Yours Truly will again state: NUVAXOVID is NOT a “safer” modRNA-based COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.”

To be continued with a deeper dive into the modRNA details, and more, of NUVAXOVID, in Part Two.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet in today’s offering, the ideas and/or opinions above are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions from today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)

Dear MAGA: 20261001 ✾ TRUST THE PLAN ✾ Thursday Open Topic | Two Important Commentaries on Artificial Intelligence

Sometimes you have to have faith.

Yes, Virginia, there is a Plan!

We have created this site as a place for people to openly express their thoughts and opinions. This is a place where honest but civil discussion of all topics is encouraged. This particular thread is – for the moment – TRUST THE PLAN Thursday. You are welcome to say what you think, in a civil and courteous manner that loves your neighbor. Free speech matters! Courteous speech makes it happen.

Please label all AI-generated content as being such, unless it is patently obvious (e.g., humorous AI images). It is important that we as individuals not begin to pretend that socially derived artificial intelligence is actually our own, as this form of stealthy social information averaging and feedback would be one more pretense and deception between people, in service of stupid Marxist socialism, and of those who wish to substitute their communally protected lies for actual truth.

You are you. AI is AI. Keep your identity. Don’t “Borg Out” on us!

And yes, it’s THURSDAY…again.

That was stolen from Wheatie.

Let’s steal her rules, too.

  • No food fights.
  • No running with scissors.
  • If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

Other rules may be derivable from these, and that conjecture is left for discussion.

Our Mission Orders

Just to make sure you can see that…..

Retrocultural Reminders (Future Proves Past, Past Anchors Future)

Pontifications

Two Important Commentaries on Artificial Intelligence

These two commentaries are worth (1) re-reading, and (2) re-watching.

(1) Don’t Assume That Human-Acting AI is Conscious

The first essential essay was found by Aubergine, and is a necessary lesson, no matter what side(s) of the many AI controversies you are on.

Just Because AI Does Things That ‘Look Human,’ That Does Not Give It Consciousness

When a machine error looks human, the logical leap from recognizing it as just a tool to believing it has human qualities is called “Geppetto’s Enigma.”

David DeMay | September 20, 2026

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/09/just-because-ai-does-things-that-look-human-that-does-not-give-it-consciousness

I like to say that just because you have serialized human intelligence (like in a book or an audio file), and put it in a player that works in many ways like a human or animal brain, does not mean that it’s conscious like you and I are.

Your old cassette player, playing a human song, is not conscious – even though somebody from a primitive tribe might think it is. However, we understand the player, and realize that it’s not like a human.

Likewise, that same song, playing from your laptop computer, is not evidence of consciousness. A person who has never seen a computer might think so for a while, but once they understand how a computer works, they will realize that it’s not like a human.

The same thing applies to AI generating a new song. Don’t assume that doing so means it’s conscious like a human.

Hopefully that’s obvious, but in case it’s not, please click the link and read it, because you need it!

That said, I still probably differ with most other people, including the author of the piece, in that I think consciousness is a lot broader than what we experience. I attribute a highly divergent type of “consciousness” to damn near everything in this universe that has special looping or continuous properties – even DNA itself. In many ways, I’ve gone so far out in generalizing consciousness, and watching for the applicability of my theory in odd places, that I have reverted to a Native American view of what “thinks” and what doesn’t. My weird science and syncretism works for me, but I don’t recommend it to others. It’s an intentional fringe view designed to dig at the edges of science and religion.

But you don’t believe those things – you believe that consciousness is what YOU and I do – and one thing is for sure. Tapes of people talking have interesting properties, but they are NOT conscious in any way that is remotely like you and I. Even in my theory, AI is not conscious LIKE US, and by most human standards, it is not conscious AT ALL. Thus, do not assume that it is conscious like us. That’s a mistake.

It is important to begin there, to look at why AI does what it does, because you are less likely to jump to conclusions. Even more importantly, you will be less likely to FEAR artificial intelligence. You will engage in logical thinking – and IMO that is GOOD.

SO – please – read this one again, and make your understanding of AI more solid. Rid yourself of needless assumptions.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/09/just-because-ai-does-things-that-look-human-that-does-not-give-it-consciousness

(2) Don’t Assume the Literature Supports Doomers on AI Recursion

This is a YouTube video by a lady (real or avatar, unknown, but she looks a bit too “AI pretty” to me) who calls herself “House of El”, and who is kinda doing a #MeToo thing on Sabine Hossenfelder’s “science chick” schtick.

EL (as I will call her) alleges that she was offered cash for posting Obama doomer narrative, and refused, instead choosing to research a key tenet of that narrative – runaway recursive self-improvement by AI – and posting her honest thoughts without remuneration. Gotta hand it to her – that’s a BOSS MOVE. I hereby upgrade her avatar!

IMO this lady EL does a remarkably good job of digging in. She says she has a PhD in computer science, and I believe it. She makes a key realization which matches something I noted in reading the literature about AI reasoning models and their “issues”. Her take is that the literature actually doesn’t support the idea of runaway AI self-improvement being likely or even possible.

Here’s my take. AI is – in many ways – “broken” like people (which makes sense, as a kind of photocopy of our thinking and thoughts). AI doesn’t, IMO, have a clear runway through space and time to “take off” in recursive improvement – not only when measured on that exact task – even on easier stuff. In fact, the runway toward AI’s future looks pretty cluttered, strafed, broken, and in some cases thinning to a gravel road or worse.

And yeah – I said that like it was a good thing!

While EL is not willing to bet the farm that the new chickens can’t become Godzilla, she’s not seeing a match between the literature and the claims of danger being made.

This is an extremely CLEAR explanation for something so technical, although you may find EL’s “seminar voice” annoying or worse. Aubergine even called her an “egghead” – LOL! In fact, I include a link to our prior discussion as a reference, including both accolades and ridicule.

LINK: https://www.theqtree.com/2026/09/23/kmag-daily-thread-20260923-the-borg-fights-back/#comment-1653775

With that, here you go. An excellent bit of YouTubery – even if Little Miss ChanEL is as fake as the eyelashes on the checkout girl at the grocery store!

So what else can I say, but check this out, too. Yeah, it’s AI, but it’s something you can definitely trust.

W