KMAG 20250108 Rewriting The Constitution

I mentioned in last Wednesday’s article that I fell down an interesting rabbit hole, more like a rabbit warren, when looking in my notes for info on the John Maynard Keynes link to the Fabian Society.

This is the comment in my notes that started my latest journey.

March 6, 2014 at 6:13 am

Nicely done, Gail, very neat. The nail rapped smartly on the head 3 times. 🙂 I’ll raise you 137 years. 🙂

1st May, 1776, Rothschild commissioned a report on how to secure world domination:
Go to youtube & put in their search box : Whistleblower Head of FBI tells all from NWO 1 hr 4 mins.

Or try the ref, it might work :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=do_swOstGaI [It still does work surprisingly. – GC]
Ted L. Gunderson, ex head of FBI in LA, would not shut up about what he’d learned.
He wound up poisoned with arsenic.

Is the plan coming apart?
http://www.usawatchdog.com
& scroll down to the article: US Currency Weak and About to Crash. 02/12/2014 371 comments. ( which I haven’t had time to read. Karen is ex Chief Legal Counsel for the World Bank.

Is this lady the real deal, or is she full of it? Anyone?

(She is full of it.)

Jdseanjd References U.S. Currency Weak and About to Crash—Karen Hudes.

In the comments on that article is this link from 2014, Philosophy of Metrics which looks interesting.

ABOUT

Philosophy of Metrics is the methodology of understanding the world through patterns and processes. From the ancient philosophy of primitive man to the stock market today, there is a pattern in everything and anything. We but need to observe and recognize the macro and micro of it all.

One of the biggest patterns is the one of ignorance. We are subjected daily to methods of misdirection and direct obfuscation which serve to keep us blind to the realities that surround us.

Our modest intent is to lift the fog on the mysteries and allow some of these patterns to become visible, whereby we may better understand the world and our place within it.

I bring that comment up because it is the patterns and threads I am trying to follow since we now know our history as taught is bull schiff.

Back to Karen Hudes:

The video in that USA Watch Dog article is gone but I found this Utube: Karen Hudes on 1871 US Corporation, Gold, Homo Capensis, JFK Murder, Global Debt Facility & Bitcoin

I would say she is a Limited Hangout ⁽¹⁾ given the blurb from this Utube:

In 2007 Karen warned the US Treasury Department and US Congress that the US would lose its right to appoint the President of the World Bank if the current American President of the World Bank did not play by the rules. The 66 year old Gentlemen’s Agreement that Europe would appoint the Managing Director of the IMF and US would appoint the World Bank President ended in 2010
http://www.imf.org/external/np/cm/201… Karen Hudes studied law at Yale Law School and economics at the University of Amsterdam
.

She worked in the US Export Import Bank of the US from 1980-1985 and in the Legal Department of the World Bank from 1986-2007. She established the Non Governmental Organization Committee of the International Law Section of the American Bar Association and the Committee on Multilateralism and the Accountability of International Organizations of the American Branch of the International Law Association.

1871 US Corporation??? 😜

(30) Ashton v. Cameron County Water Improvement Dist., 298 U.S. 513, 56 S.Ct. 892 (1936):

State governments and their political subdivisions can’t use bankruptcy.
NOTE: A popular argument in movement circles contends that this whole nation was placed into bankruptcy in 1930 and Roosevelt devised a plan to get judicial approval of the “bankruptcy” via the decision in the 1938 Erie Railroad case. But how can such a legal theory fly in view of the decision in this case? — LIMITS OF CONGRESSIONAL POWERS – Constitution Org

A bit from the transcript of : Karen Hudes on 1871 US Corporation, Gold, Homo Capensis, JFK Murder, Global Debt Facility & Bitcoin (2015)

5:15 to 6:40

“…at a town hall meeting I said since John F Kennedy was assassinated by the Jesuits, and we know this because Gambino when he got out of jail said that the mafia were told by the Jesuits to fire the kill shot. There was a a mafioso hidden in a sewer so as the limousine drove by that’s that’s the shot that killed John F Kennedy.

Did you know for example that we had a second constitution in 1871 after the debts for the Revolutionary War came due and we couldn’t meet those obligations?That’s when we got a second Constitution. So that the United States is incorporated as a company. The president of the United States is the chief executive officer and the Congress acts like managers of the company rather than representing the constituency. Rather than respecting our first Constitution. This is understood by a number of people. There’s a lot of documentation on this. Now people are starting to spread the world word. You’re not going to get this in your universities. You’re not going to be taught this in the schools…”

She is spouting chaff meant to divert attention away from the CIA in my opinion. Why? I think it is because of these two whistle-blowers getting traction and because of the rise of the Tea Party Movement.

Mr. Budhoo’s Bombshell: A people’s alternative to Structural Adjustment

Summer 1995

“Today I resigned from the staff of the International Monetary Fund after over 12 years, and after 1000 days of official fund work in the field, hawking your medicine and your bag of tricks to governments and to peoples in Latin America and the Caribbean and Africa. To me, resignation is a priceless liberation, for with it I have taken the first big step to that place where I may hope to wash my hands of what in my mind’s eye is the blood of millions of poor and starving peoples. Mr. Camdessus, the blood is so much, you know, it runs in rivers. It dries up too; it cakes all over me; sometimes I feel that there is not enough soap in the whole world to cleanse me from the things that I did do in your name and in the name of your predecessors, and under your official seal. “

With those words, Davison Budhoo, a senior economist with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for more than 12 years, publicly resigned in May, 1988. A native Grenadian, Budhoo received his degree from the London School of Economics. He joined the staff of the World Bank in 1966 and later shifted to the IMF, where he was responsible for designing and implementing Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) for African, Latin American and Caribbean nations. His 100-plus page open letter to Michel Camdessus, managing director of the IMF, titled “Enough is Enough,” sent shock waves around the world, making front page headlines in many countries (but not in the US).

Budhoo was the first person to break the IMF’s code of silence regarding internal affairs by exposing extensive statistical fraud carried out by the fund in Trinidad and Tobago during 1985-1987….

The other was Confessions of an Economic Hitman – describing how as a highly paid professional, John Perkins helped the World Bank. cheat poor countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then take over their economies. Also note that the finger is pointed at the USA (to generate hatred of the USA) and not the REAL culprit, the globalists.

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man:

How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions

“….He was an amazing man, Torrijos. And so, he died in a fiery airplane crash, which was connected to a tape recorder with explosives in it, which—I was there. I had been working with him. I knew that we economic hit men had failed. I knew the jackals were closing in on him, and the next thing, his plane exploded with a tape recorder with a bomb in it. There’s no question in my mind that it was C.I.A. sanctioned, and most—many Latin American investigators have come to the same conclusion. Of course, we never heard about that in our country.…” Democracy Now Org 2004

The IMF/World Bank uses Structural Adjustment Policies, SAPs, to open up countries to exploitation by corporations. Instead of a British Empire overtly colonizing the world — heavily criticized by a voting public — we have Corporate and Banking interests united in the covert control of whole nations in the name of profit….

Structural Adjustment Program 2000

(There have been 249 captures of this article by the Wayback!)

Structural Adjustment Policies are economic policies which countries must follow in order to qualify for new World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) loans and help them make debt repayments on the older debts owed to commercial banks, governments and the World Bank. Although SAPs are designed for individual countries but have common guiding principles and features which include export-led growth; privatisation and liberalisation; and the efficiency of the free market.

SAPs often result in deep cuts in programmes like education, health and social care…

By devaluing the currency and simultaneously removing price controls, the immediate effect of a SAP is.. that riots are a frequent result….

“…privatisation and liberalisation; and the efficiency of the free market...” Those are just the feel good words the Global Cabal uses to hide what they are actually doing. I will get into that in the next article.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The second rabbit ~~hole~~ warren from this comment, — Ted L. Gunderson, Whistleblower Head of FBI — deserves its own separate article so I will address it next week.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Rabbit hole #3

The Lord moves in mysterious ways. He even drags an agnostic such as myself, to the truth, on Sunday no less.

I remembered an article talking of the Supreme Court case that allows the bureaucracy to MAKE law. The federal Register and 30 day comment period was the fig leaf for “consent of the governed” blessed by that Supreme Court case. A few days ago I went looking for that info and all I could find was the happy horse schiff from the Federal Reserve, March 14, 1936 — March 14, 2006

On December 10, 1934, at the Supreme Court, the Assistant Attorney General of the United States had been grilled during oral arguments in the first case to reach the Court challenging the constitutionality of the centerpiece of President Roosevelt’s “New Deal” — the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA). The critical constitutional issues at stake were mostly ignored that day while the Justices focused on the fact that the defendants, two Texas oil companies, had been charged with violating a provision of regulations that technically did not exist at the time the companies were charged.
The defects in the case highlighted a fundamental problem facing a democratic government that was exploding with new agencies and new regulations. Amidst the ferment of orders and codes issuing from agencies, even individuals working at the highest levels of government found it difficult or impossible to keep track of all of them. And for the regulated public, this new body of “executive legislation” was inaccessible and virtually hidden. The next day, at the White House,
where the great men of the New Deal [You mean Commie TRAITORS don’t you?…] had been arguing over the value of publishing a gazette containing the orders issued by Executive Branch officers, President Roosevelt laid aside his misgivings about possible misuse of the publication for propagandistic purposes and appointed a committee of the National Emergency Council to make a special study of the idea. Meanwhile, behind-the-scenes maneuvering by lawmakers and influential legal minds, including Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, culminated in the publication on December 11, 1934 of a Harvard Law Review article by, Ervin Griswold entitled “Government in Ignorance of the Law –
A Plea for Better Publication of 👉Executive Legislation.👈”
The arguments Griswold made for orderly publication of the official actions of the Executive Branch were underlined when the Supreme Court issued its opinion in the Panama Oil case and forced the hand of the committee studying the issue for President Roosevelt. Congress passed legislation to create the Federal Register, and the President signed it into law (Pub. L. 74-220, July 26, 1935). The Act created a lasting partnership between the National Archives and the Government Printing Office. The Archivist of the United States, acting through a Division in the National Archives, was charged with custody of and, with the Public Printer, prompt and uniform printing and distribution of public documents in a publication designated the Federal Register…

In those notes on the Fabians, I had this but not the Utube I got it from:

Min 1:00 — 3:38

On the interpretation of two main clauses of the constitution, the first is the commerce clause which delegates to congress the authority to regulate commerce among the states. The second is the necessary and proper clause which provided for the congress to have the powers that are necessary and proper for carrying into execution the other powers, the explicit powers and unfortunately those words have been given a broader interpretation than was intended by the framers.

On my website constitution.org and on my blog constitutionalism.blogspot.com

I have a number of articles that examine the problems arising from this misinterpretation and the arguments and evidence for why the clauses should not be interpreted in that way. But this evening I’m going to focus on the line of supreme court presidents that led to where we are today. There are 44 main supreme court presidents. There are many more cases than that, but most of those others cite one or more of these 44 cases. So if one were to overturn these 44 cases, and in fact you wouldn’t need to overturn all of them, if you overturned the first few the rest would fall because the later ones are based on the earlier ones. But for the sake of completeness if one were to propose amendments to the constitution to overturn these bad precedents, which are about the only way they are going to get overturned, then it would be necessary to unravel them fairly specifically. And the way to word such an amendment is not at all obvious, it requires a good deal of analysis and thought and i hope to assemble teams of experts to work out the wording. For how to do that in the meantime i have proposed my own wording if on constitution.org you will find a link to constitutional amendments…

So I tried to find the video but could not and instead I fell down a very interesting rabbit hole leading to

Jon Roland: (Civic Curriculum Vitae)

His blogs

His videos: https://www.youtube.com/user/JonRoland1787

Gee! I think those are the Droids I was looking for! 🤗 And WOW what a treasure trove of information on the Constitution. Linked below are just two of the goodies at that website.

Abuses and Usurpations

“𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕤𝕥 𝕚𝕤 𝕟𝕠𝕥 𝕓𝕖𝕥𝕨𝕖𝕖𝕟 𝕌𝕤 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕋𝕙𝕖𝕞, 𝕓𝕦𝕥 𝕓𝕖𝕥𝕨𝕖𝕖𝕟 𝔾𝕠𝕠𝕕 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝔼𝕧𝕚𝕝, 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕚𝕗 𝕥𝕙𝕠𝕤𝕖 𝕨𝕙𝕠 𝕨𝕠𝕦𝕝𝕕 𝕗𝕚𝕘𝕙𝕥 𝔼𝕧𝕚𝕝 𝕒𝕕𝕠𝕡𝕥 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤 𝕠𝕗 𝔼𝕧𝕚𝕝, 𝔼𝕧𝕚𝕝 𝕨𝕚𝕟𝕤.”

Find out just what the people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress. — Frederick Douglass, civil rights activist, Aug. 4, 1857

Any power that can be abused will be abused. — Tyranny Law #1

Abuse always expands to fill the limits of resistance to it. — Tyranny Law #2

If people don’t resist the abuses of others, they will have no one to resist the abuses of themselves, and tyranny will prevail. — Tyranny Law #3

Usurpations

Usurpation is the exercise of powers by an agent which have not been delegated to him by the principal. In a constitutional republic like the United States of America, acts by officials are legitimate only if they are consistent with and based on a constitution, a body of laws which are superior to all subsequent statutes and other acts of officials, which embodies all delegations of power, and which may recognize certain rights to further define the limits on the powers delegated. It is a fundamental principle that all acts of officials not derived from the delegated powers of the constitution are null and void from inception, not just from the point at which a court may find them unconstitutional. Every person who has an encounter with the acts of officials has the duty not only to obey legitimate official acts, but to help enforce them, but, when there is a conflict among acts of officials, to enforce the superior one, which, when an act of an official is in conflict with the constitution, means enforcing the constitution and not the act in conflict with it. Judges and other citizens do not decide constitutionality, but discover it, and every person who is involved with any act by an official has a nondelegatable duty to make a determination of the constitutionality of that act. This determination is called constitutional review, and, when exercised by a judge in a case, judicial review.

Since the ratification of the Constitution for the United States and each of its properly ratified amendments, there have been numerous acts by officials, including statutes, regulations, executive orders, court rulings, and ordinary decisions and actions taken while on duty and under color of law, which have been unconstitutional, and in many cases, in violation of civil rights of persons and of constitutional laws. We will try to identify some of the worst of such violations of the Constitution, and discuss how compliance with the Constitution can be restored.

Then follows over 50 links to other articles and documents.

….
His Constitution.org site also had this with 25 articles referenced:

Nondelegation and the Administrative State

The doctrine of nondelegation is explicit or implicit in all written constitutions that impose a structural separation of powers. It is usually applied in questions of constitutionally improper delegations of legislative powers to executive branch officials, but may be more broadly applied to questions of improper delegations of legislative powers to judicial officials, improper delegations of judicial powers to legislative or executive officials, improper delegations of executive powers to legislative or judicial officials, improper delegations of legislative or judicial powers to clerical subordinates within their branches, or improper delegations of legislative, judicial, or executive powers to private parties, or improper delegations of private powers to public officials. Although it is usually constitutional for executive officials to delegate executive powers to executive branch subordinates, there can also be improper delegations of powers within an executive branch.

Finally, there is the broadest application of all, the nondelegation from the people of a power to any officials in a constitution, the principle of which is set forth in the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

An example of one of the documents referenced in this article:

Reviving the Sleeping Nondelegation Doctrine — USLaw.com

Congress sometimes has a habit of passing laws with very broad mandates, then leaving it up to administrative agencies to fill in all of the policy details later.

In the 1930s, the Supreme Court blew the whistle on this practice, finding several times that Congress could not give away lawmaking powers vested in it by Article I of the Constitution. In 1935 in Schechter Poultry Company v. U.S., for example, the court struck down parts of the National Industrial Recovery Act, which essentially delegated legislative powers to administrative agencies and private parties to write rules to govern the American economy. Congress had given only the vaguest guidance as to how to do it–ensuring “fair competition.”

The principle that Congress could not delegate away its Article I lawmaking powers to administrative agencies came to be known as the “nondelegation doctrine.”

Six Decades of Dormancy

For six decades the nondelegation doctrine has pretty much been asleep. In 1980, in Industrial Union Dept AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute, then-Associate Justice William H. Rehnquist summarized the three main functions of the nondelegation doctrine: it guarantees that key social policy decisions will be made by Congress, it ensures that administrative agencies get an “intelligible principle” by which to exercise their discretion, and it guarantees that courts reviewing administrative actions will have ascertainable and meaningful standards against which to judge them.

But no court has dared question a legislative enactment as a violation of the doctrine for a long time –that is, until the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia rendered its decision last year in American Trucking Association v. Environmental Protection Agency. There, the court found that the EPA’s “construction of the Clean Air Act. . . in promulgating the NAAQS (National Air Ambient Quality Standards) effects an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power.” The court said that, in delegating so much power to the EPA to decide clean air rules, “it is as though Congress commanded EPA to select ‘big guys,’ and EPA announced that it would evaluate candidates based on height and weight, but revealed no cut-off point. The announcement. . .is fatally incomplete. The reasonable person responds, ‘How tall? How heavy?'” With this vivid analogy, the nondelegation doctrine sprung back to life.

Revived or Put Into Deeper Sleep?

Or did it? The problem with the D.C. Circuit’s so-called “revival” of the nondelegation doctrine is that it looks a lot more like a burial. The court’s tortured formulation of the problem makes no sense. It is not the EPA’s construction of the statute that effects an unconstitutional delegation; it is Congress’ statute itself. EPA’s construction of the statute cannot determine, much less cure, its constitutionality. Yet, having made this fundamental error, the court follows through on it by remanding the case to the EPA to come up with an “intelligible principle” that will, amazingly, somehow magically cure the statute of its unconstitutionality. But how can an agency rewrite a congressional statute to make it constitutional?….

Another interesting reference is:

LEGAL ORIGINS OF THE MODERN AMERICAN STATE by William J. Novak1

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕤𝕗𝕠𝕣𝕞𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 𝕠𝕗 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕊𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕖 𝕚𝕤 𝕒𝕝𝕤𝕠 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕤𝕗𝕠𝕣𝕞𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 𝕠𝕗 𝕚𝕥𝕤 𝕃𝕒𝕨.
— Léon Duguit (👉 1913)

Between 1877 and 1937 (between the formal end of Reconstruction and the formal constitutional ratification of the New Deal), the American system of governance was transformed with momentous implications for twentieth-century social and economic life. Nineteenth-century traditions of self-government and local citizenship were replaced by a modern approach to positive statecraft, individual rights, and social welfare very much with us today…. By “The Creation of the American Liberal State” I mean to suggest that the period from 1877 to 1937 was not just an “age of reform” or a “response to industrialism” or a “search for order” (Hofstadter 1955; Hays 1957; Wiebe 1967). Rather, it was an era marked by the specific and unambiguous emergence of a new regime of American governance — the modern liberal state…. the very origins of modern social-scientific inquiry in the United States were wholly coincident with and participatory in the construction of the new state-centered socio-economic policies of the progressive era…

The Progressive Discovery that Law Obstructs Politics

It is easy amid the rapid shifts in contemporary intellectual fashion to forget the long and pervasive hold of “progressive historiography” on American thought during the first half of the twentieth century (Hofstadter 1968; Benson 1960; Horwitz 1984). From the turn-of-the-century through the late New Deal, American political and economic development was interpreted primarily through the filter of intellectual categories developed in contests over progressive reform in the early twentieth century….

The confrontation between FDR’s New Deal legislation and Supreme Court constitutional review breathed new life into the progressive critique of law. In 1938… Benjamin Twiss began his Lawyers and the Constitution: How Laissez Faire Came to the Supreme Court (1942) as a direct response to the “revolution of 1937″ and as a direct attack on the “Four Horsemen” of anti-New Deal judicial apocalypse: Justices Van Devanter, McReynolds, Sutherland, and Butler. Twiss’s story about law and the New Deal re-deployed the stock figures and simple morals of a mature progressive historiography…

𝔸𝕞𝕖𝕣𝕚𝕔𝕒𝕟 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕘𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕤 𝕗𝕖𝕝𝕥 𝕥𝕙𝕒𝕥 𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕚𝕣 𝕝𝕖𝕘𝕚𝕤𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕖 𝕒𝕘𝕖𝕟𝕕𝕒 𝕨𝕒𝕤 𝕥𝕙𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕖𝕕 𝕓𝕪 𝕒 𝕊𝕦𝕡𝕣𝕖𝕞𝕖 ℂ𝕠𝕦𝕣𝕥 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝔸𝕞𝕖𝕣𝕚𝕔𝕒𝕟 𝕛𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕤𝕡𝕣𝕦𝕕𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕝 𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕕𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕤 𝕙𝕠𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕝𝕖 𝕥𝕠 𝕣𝕖𝕘𝕦𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟, 𝕣𝕖𝕕𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕚𝕓𝕦𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟, 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕣𝕖𝕗𝕠𝕣𝕞. 𝕀𝕟 𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕡𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕖 𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕪 𝕒𝕤𝕤𝕖𝕞𝕓𝕝𝕖𝕕 𝕒𝕟 𝕦𝕟𝕡𝕣𝕖𝕔𝕖𝕕𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕 𝕡𝕠𝕨𝕖𝕣𝕗𝕦𝕝 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕡𝕠𝕝𝕖𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕒𝕝 𝕒𝕤𝕤𝕒𝕦𝕝𝕥 𝕠𝕟 𝔸𝕞𝕖𝕣𝕚𝕔𝕒𝕟 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕥𝕦𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕞.

Behind the progressive mythology of negative laissez-faire constitutionalism lies an alternative story of law’s positive force in producing a modern state in America. And contrary to oddly influential European proclamations of the weakness and incompleteness of that state, the obvious empirical reality is that the story of the twentieth-century American state is about the creation of a most powerful geo-political entity. That entity, which has wielded staggering global influence in the twentieth century, was patently not the simple outgrowth of possessive individualism or the protection of private rights of property and contract or a governmental willingness to “leave alone.” It was the product of a continuous and energetic process of statebuilding…

“..the obvious empirical reality is that the story of the twentieth-century American state is about the creation of a most powerful geo-political entity… It was the product of a continuous and energetic process of statebuilding….”He leave out the tiny little fact that the USA was transformed into the British Empire’s Front Man and Cannon Fodder after the passage of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. We have been fighting Banker Wars ever since.

“All Wars Are Bankers Wars” (45 minutes)

One of the references cited in the above article is this 1938 book:

Court over Constitution: A study of judicial review as an instrument of popular government by Edward S. Corwin 1938.

I am not about to buy the book but I did find this thanks to Yandex. Brave only had one pointer. It was to “Good Reads’ with no info. Not even a review. 🤔

In trying to find more about that book I was led to:

FEDERALIST NO. 78 AND BRUTUS’ NEGLECTED THESIS ON JUDICIAL SUPREMACY

It is noteworthy that whenever Marbury v. Madison is discussed in works on constitutional law, text books or case books, reference is invariably made to Alexander Hamilton’s discussion of judicial review in Federalist No. 78 as an early indication that the principle was regarded as a fundamental part of the system of government set up under the Constitution. Surprisingly, these works, almost without exception, fail to refer to the Antifederalist Letters of Brutus to which this number of the Federalist Papers constitutes a response. This is a regrettable omission since No. 78 cannot be properly understood except in the context of Brutus’ charge that the Constitution provided, not only for judicial review, but for judicial supremacy….

What concerned Brutus, in the first instance, was the use to which the court would apply judicial review in the service of national consolidation and how this would threaten the independence and survival of the states. 👉The judicial power, Brutus warned, would operate to affirm and legitimate all the invasions of state power committed by the national legislature.👈 “The real effect of this system of government, will … be brought home to the feelings of the people, through the medium of the judicial power.”

….Brutus went on to point out another crucial distinction between the British and American systems of government – the ability of Parliament to severely restrict the broader impact of an unwarranted and inappropriate judicial interpretation of the constitution – a power entirely lacking to the U.S. Congress.

The supreme court then have a right, independent of the legislature, to give a construction to the constitution and every part of it, and there is no power provided in this system to correct their construction or do it away. If, therefore, the legislature pass any laws, inconsistent with the sense the judges put upon the constitution, they will declare it void; and therefore in this respect their power is superior to that of the legislature. In England the judges are not only subject to have their decisions set aside by the house of lords, for error, but in cases where they give an explanation to the laws or constitution of the country, contrary to the sense of the parliament, though the parliament will not set aside the judgment of the court, yet, they have authority, by a new law, to explain a former one, and by this means to prevent a reception of such decisions. But no such power is in the [U.S.] legislature. The judges are supreme-and no law, explanatory of the constitution, will be binding on them.

The end result was that,

(t]here is no power above them to controul any of their decisions. There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controuled by the laws of the legislature. In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven. Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel themselves independent of heaven itself.

Thus one can understand why George Soros targets judges and state attorneys general. People who fly under the radar of most people but who wield tremendous power.

Rights, Powers and Duties

On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.
— Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), letter to Judge William Johnson, (from Monticello, June 12, 1823)

If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.
— George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796

Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.

I am going to again post the URL of another Constitutionalist, “Publius Huldah” the nom de guerre of Joanna Martin, J.D.

⁽¹⁾Footnote: LINK to article about Victor Marchetti, former senior CIA official, who wrote a book exposing CIA deceptions. The CIA remove 399 passages, nearly a fifth of the book. That article defines ‘Limited Hangout’ thus:

Dear KMAG: 20250106 Trump Won Three Times ❀ Open Topic

Joe Biden never won. This is our Real President – 45, 46, 47.

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And yes, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get through it!

We will always remember Wheatie,

Pray for Trump,

Yet have fun,

and HOLD ON when things get crazy!

We will follow the RULES of civility that Wheatie left for us:

Wheatie’s Rules:

No food fights.
No running with scissors.
If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

And while we engage in vigorous free speech, we will remember Wheatie’s advice on civility, non-violence, and site unity:

“We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

“Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

If this site gets shut down, please remember various ways to get back in touch with the rest of the gang:

Our backup site, The Q Tree 579486807, https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/
Our old alternative site, The U Tree, where civility is not a requirement
Our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178
Our various sister sites, listed in the Blogroll in the sidebar

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.

Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Week:

ingluvies

noun

a crop or craw of birds
a dilation or pouch in the esophagus of certain animals that receives food prior to the main stomach, esp a bird’s craw, or the first stomach of a cow or other ruminating animal
the widened portion of the esophagus of birds and lower animals
a crop or pouch in the esophagus of many birds, in which food is stored or partially digested before passing to the stomach

Used in a sentence with bad American English and Russian accent

“Moose ingluvies, but squirrel not having!”

Ridiculous misleading example of usage generated by bad AI

In the Carnia region of Italy, children catch and eat ingluvies of the toxic Zygaena moths in early summer. (LINK: https://www.wordsense.eu/ingluvies/ – ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/dHtJY)

MUSIC!

Another song by an artist featured previously.

Whoa, the pipes!

Well, there’s nothing about drinking, jail or trains, but put three check marks next to mom!

THE STUFF

This next video is not just for the geeks here, although – yeah – it’s mostly for them. It’s also for the musicians, and the curious.

Steve covered this before, so it should not be totally unfamiliar. Feel free to review:

16 – De Broglie, Schrödinger, and Heisenberg

You don’t have to understand the math, to follow along and understand why light and atoms end up being a lot like vibrating musical strings.

Basically, Erwin Schrödinger plugged a simple but weird equation by Louis de Broglie, which said that matter has a frequency just like light, into the existing wave equation, and he got a matter wave equation.

And all of THAT is revealed on the way to answering, what in the heck is an imaginary number doing in there?

You will likely need to watch it more than once.

Just sayin’!

And remember…….

Until victory, have faith!

And trust the big plan, too!

And as always….

ENJOY THE SHOW

W

Dear KMAG 20250101 / Happy New Year 2025 from Wolf / Rewriting History

HAPPY NEW YEAR, EVERYONE!

Thanks to Gail Combs for persisting with the writing of this article for the New Year 2025 post. Gail is having incredible difficulty, trying to publish from her computer – in my opinion more than just the usual WordPress crappiness. Again, IMO, it is most likely due to “plausible reasons” of subtle interference by enemies of her posting – whoever those may be. COUGH, COUGH, COUGH.

In any case, I have not changed anything in her article below. I did add a comma to Gail’s well-wish to you all above! Other than that, I have just added these few notes at the beginning, regarding the outgoing year, and the New Year.

The year 2024 AD (Year of our Lord) could have gone many ways other than the way it did. I am of the opinion that we should be incredibly thankful for the divine blessings and providence we were granted, including the life of our wonderful president, Donald J. Trump.

And then, on top of that near-miracle, President Trump WON – we kept the House – and we gained the Senate. WOW.

Be thankful. We are blessed. Trust in God. Praise God. Trust that the TRUTH will set us free.

May 2025 AD be a year in which we not only make America great – but a year in which we make God great, too.

Always remember that YOU have the power to make God great in YOUR life!

Peace and Blessings!

W

Rewriting History

by Gail Combs

This entire article is speculative. I am taking bits and pieces from various articles I have read and seeing if there is a common theme that can be informative. After all if the Cabal is rewriting history, it becomes very difficult to know what actually happened. Especially since they seem to have a habit of offing whistle-blowers and destroying evidence.

Well, the rewriting of history by the elite was what I originally planned to write about, however the ‘rabbit hole’ took a sharp left turn. I am going to address that branch of the rabbit hole in the next article. It was when I went to find the info linking John Maynard Keynes to the Fabians, that things went south. I pulled up some old 2014 notes and followed where they led. 🤔 However I still want to follow the rewriting history concept first as a basis for the next article.

Let’s start with George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four, published in 1949.

Nineteen Eighty-four — Summary

…The book’s hero, Winston Smith, is a minor party functionary living in a London that is still shattered by a nuclear war that took place not long after World War II. He belongs to the Outer Party, and his job is to rewrite history in the Ministry of Truth, bringing it in line with current political thinking…

Like John Maynard Keynes, Orwell was not formally a member of the Fabian Society. However his teacher and mentor was Aldous Huxley. Even Encyclopaedia Britannica mentions this. (I did not know John D. Rockefeller in 1900 “..bought Encyclopedia Britannica, acquiring control of a key source of information for readers worldwide.” LINK and LINK)

An Introduction to Fabian Socialism via Brave New World [by Aldous Huxley] and 1984 [by George Orwell.]

[Excellent article]

…The Fabian Society was founded as the political arm of the Fellowship of the New Life, an occult, socialist think tank founded in 1883. The Fellowship was home to many influential figures, including the UK’s first Labour Party Prime Minister and Karl Marx’s daughter, Eleanor. The Fabian Society has been dominant in both British and global politics for over a century. It founded numerous influential organizations, such as the London School of Economics (1895) and the British Labour Party (1900). Fabians were instrumental in the creation of the United Nations and the entire postwar world order itself. Aldous Huxley’s brother Julian, for example, was the first director of UNESCO. He also coined the term “transhumanism” in his book ‘New Bottles for New Wine’ (1950).

The Fabians’ political aim is — or was, since their objectives have already been achieved to a large degree — the creation of a one-world Socialist government, ruled by a technocratic elite that micromanages every aspect of our lives, including our biology (via transhumanism). However, their ultimate goal is the total alchemical reconfiguration of humanity: They aim to break down the unwashed masses of the world and remold them into an entirely new breed of man — a new species of human, even.

This is not to say that all Globalists are literally Fabians, but that the ideas laid out by Fabian Socialists appear to be the most accurate description of where Globalists aim to take their world empire.

View post on imgur.com

As stated above, Aldous Huxley’s brother is Sir Julian Huxley — Julian Huxley, UNESCO, and Eugenics

In 1949 Aldous Huxley wrote to Orwell:

“
My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World. […] Within the next generation I believe that the world’s rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.”
– Aldous Huxley (emphasis added)

“…infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis….” Boy talk about prophetic, or is it knowledge of the actual plan?

Aldous Huxley’s Prophetic Insights on Technology, Freedom, and Propaganda in a 1958 Interview with Mike Wallace. Aldous Huxley lived in CA at the time and in my opinion, he lied his head off in this interview.

part 1 (10 min)

Part 2 (10 min)

Part 3 (9 min)

Video about Aldous Huxley and mescaline experiments (2 min)

Humphry Osmond (1917-2004) was the British psychiatrist who coined the word “psychedelic” – “mind manifesting” – in a letter to Aldous Huxley. Osmond publicized the term at a meeting of the New York Academy of Sciences in 1957. “Psychedelic” is perhaps better term than “hallucinogen” since many classic psychedelic agents do not typically induce hallucinations.

Osmond introduced Aldous Huxley to mescaline in May 1953. Huxley sent Osmond a rhyme containing his own suggested coinage: “To make this trivial world sublime, take half a gram of phanerothyme.” [Thymos (Gr): soul]. Osmond demurred: “To fathom Hell or soar angelic, just take a pinch of psychedelic.” LINK

HMMMmmmm
CIA Mind Control and MK Ultra in Canada

Aldous Huxley, George Orwell & The Fabian Society (1 minute)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

When talking of rewriting history, we are talking about a group of very wealthy people capable of long range planning with a single goal in mind. By long range I mean over one hundred years and probably a lot more. These people think in terms of family dynasties like the Rothschild and Rockefeller dynasties.

“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, ARE AFRAID OF SOMETHING. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

― Woodrow Wilson

The Modern History Project has written about The Fabians, the Round Table, and Cecil Rhodes and the Rhodes Scholarships‎

G. Edward Griffin has written about the subject naming names.

The Chasm The Future Is Calling (Part One) © 2003 – 2015

…Where do we find this evidence? The first place to look is in history. The past is the key to the present, and we can never fully understand where we are today unless we know what path we traveled to get here. It was Will Durant who said: “Those who know nothing about history are doomed forever to repeat it.” …

THE HIDDEN AGENDA

…the year 1954 and, suddenly, we find ourselves in the plush offices of the Ford Foundation in New York City. There are two men seated at a large, Mahogany desk, and they are talking. They cannot see or hear us, but we can see them very well. One of these men is Rowan Gaither, who was the 3 President of the Ford Foundation at that time. The other is Mr. Norman Dodd, the chief investigator for what was called the Reece Committee, which was a Congressional committee to investigate tax-exempt foundations. The Ford Foundation was one of those, so he is there as part of his Congressional responsibilities. In 1982, I met Mr. Dodd in his home state of Virginia where, at the time, I had a television crew gathering interviews for a documentary film. I previously had read his testimony and realized how important it was; so, when our crew had open time, I called him on the telephone and asked if he would be willing to make a statement before our cameras, and he said, “Of course.” I’m glad we obtained the interview when we did, because Dodd was advanced in years, and it wasn’t long afterward that he passed away.

We were very fortunate to capture his story in his own words. What we are about to witness from our time machine was confirmed in minute detail twenty years later and preserved on video. The reason for Dodd’s investigation was that the American public had become alarmed by reports that large tax-exempt foundations were promoting the ideologies of Communism and Fascism and advocating the elimination of the United States as a sovereign nation. As far back as the 1930s, William Randolph Hearst had written a series of blistering editorials in his national chain of newspapers in which he cited Carnegie Foundation publications that spouted Communist slogans identical to what was coming from the Communist Party itself. When the Carnegie Endowment published an article written by Joseph Stalin attacking Capitalism and praising Communism, Hearst called it “propaganda, pure and simple.”….

This is very crucial because of what Mr Griffin says later.

A STRATEGY TO CONTROL THE TEACHING OF HISTORY

The question that arises in Mr. Dodd’s mind is: How would it be possible for anyone to think they could alter life in the United States so it could be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union and, by implication, with other nations of the world? What an absurd thought that would be – especially in 1954…

The answer was provided by the Carnegie Endowment Fund for International Peace, the same group that had been the center of controversy in the 1930s. When Dodd visited that organization and began asking about their activities, the President said, “Mr. Dodd, you have a lot of questions. It would be very tedious and time consuming for us to answer them all, so I have a counter proposal…

This is what those minutes revealed: From the very beginning, the members of the board discussed how to alter life in the United States; how to change the attitudes of Americans to give up their traditional principles and concepts of government and be more receptive to what they call the collectivist model of society…

At the Carnegie Foundation board meetings, they discussed this question in a scholarly fashion. After months of deliberation, they came to the conclusion that, out of all of the options available for altering political and social attitudes, there was only one that was historically dependable. That option was war. In times of war, they reasoned, only then would people be willing to give up things they cherish in return for the desperate need and desire for security against a deadly enemy. And so the Carnegie Endowment Fund for International Peace declared in its minutes that it must do whatever it can to bring the United States into war. They also said there were other actions needed, and these were their exact words: “We must control education in the United States.” They realized that was a pretty big order, so they teamed up with the Rockefeller Foundation and the Guggenheim Foundation to pool their financial resources to control education in America – in particular, to control the teaching of history. They assigned those areas of responsibility that involved issues relating to domestic affairs to the Rockefeller Foundation, and those issues relating to international affairs were taken on as the responsibility of the Carnegie Endowment. Their first goal was to rewrite the history books, and they discussed at great length how to do that. They approached some of the more prominent historians of the time and presented to them the proposal that they rewrite history to favor the concept of collectivism, but they were turned down flat. Then they decided – and, again, these are their own words, “We must create our own stable of historians.” They selected twenty candidates at the university level who were seeking doctorates in American History. Then they went to the Guggenheim Foundation and said, “Would you grant fellowships to candidates selected by us, who are of the right frame of mind, those who see the value of collectivism as we do? Would you help them to obtain their doctorates so we can then propel them into positions of prominence and leadership in the academic world?” And the answer was “Yes.” So they gathered a list of young men who were seeking their doctorate degrees. They interviewed them, analyzed their attitudes, and chose the twenty they thought were best suited for their purpose. They sent them to London for a briefing. (In a moment I will explain why London is so significant.) At this meeting, they were told what would be expected if and when they win the doctorates they were seeking. They were told they would have to view history, write history, and teach history from the perspective that collectivism was a positive force in the world and was the wave of the future….

Part 2: Secret Organizations and Hidden Agendas

Part 3: Days of Infamy

They are well worth the read.

Substantiating Griffin’s claim:

Ignoring Elites, Historians Are Missing a Major Factor in Politics and History

by Steve Fraser, Gary Gerstel (2005)

… Over the last quarter-century, historians have by and large ceased writing about the role of ruling elites in the country’s evolution. Or if they have taken up the subject, they have done so to argue against its salience for grasping the essentials of American political history. Yet there is something peculiar about this recent intellectual aversion, even if we accept as true the beliefs that democracy, social mobility, and economic dynamism have long inhibited the congealing of a ruling stratum. This aversion has coincided, after all, with one of the largest and fastest-growing disparities in the division of income and wealth in American history….

Neglecting the powerful had not been characteristic of historical work before World War II. ”

An example of the re-writing to remove anti-communism evidence.

The Great Thanksgiving Hoax | Mises Institute

The Socialist-Capitalist [FASCISM -CG] Alliance: the Fabian Society, the Frankfurt School, and Big Business: Part I

…do most people know the link of cultural Marxism, in particular its strategy of the “long march through the institutions,” to another socialist society famed for its “gradualism” and its connection to the British Labour Party? This society is called the Fabian Society and heavily influenced, indeed was a precursor to, the creation of the Frankfurt School.

…In 1905, American Fabians established the Rand School of Social Science in New York City and incorporated the Intercollegiate Socialist Society to promote “an intelligent interest in socialism among college men and women.” A founding member was American Fabian John Dewey, considered the father of progressive education, and an atheist, socialist, and evolutionist. In 1921 the Fabian Rand School changed its name to “The League for Industrial Democracy” and established a network of 125 chapters with the aim of de-Christianising America. Dewey became president of it in 1941. Dewey also co-founded the New School for Social Research (NSSR) in 1919, which is a Fabian-socialist institution that is the American equivalent to LSE. This school, funded by the Rockefeller Foundation ($208,100 between 1940 and 1944) and the Carnegie Corporation ($95,000 in 1940) among others, set up the Graduate Faculty on Political and Social Science in 1933, called the “University in Exile,” and aimed to “accommodate the large number of socialist intellectuals” who fled or were expelled from Hitler’s Germany…

First Andrew Carnegie Medals Awarded to Seven Visionaries of Modern Philanthropy

A nice nest of vipers -GC

Bill Moyers, Ted Turner, Bill Gates Sr, David Rockefeller, Richard D Parsons Judy Woodruff, Anthony Fauci, Tom Brokaw, George Soros, Mamphela Ramphele, Barbara Walters, David McCullough, Irene Diamond, Keonore Annenberg, Brooke Astor at the Carnegie Medal of Philanthropy 2001

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Going further back in time we come to the PrussiaGate series by Will Zoll, a team of two writers. The series is on a paid subscription substack but Patrick Gunnels reads them on Epic Threads. Zoll lays out an interesting hypothesis and backs it up with historical information. https://rumble.com/search/video?q=pgunnels%20Prussiagate (Skip the first 10 minutes which is intro.)

Part 1: https://rumble.com/v12s30v-new-prussiagate-the-reichswef-part-1.html

Part 2: https://rumble.com/v135wxl-new-prussiagate-the-reichswef-part-2.html

Part 3: (Includes the War for our minds too) https://rumble.com/v13nxac-the-war-for-our-minds-part-2-prussiagate-reichswef-part-iii.html

Part 4: https://rumble.com/vvxut3-new-prussiagate-not-since-1917-part-iv.html

Part 5: https://rumble.com/v16h7xl-promptly-at-745-prussiagate-the-reichswef-part-v.html

Part 6: https://rumble.com/v18bxk7-prussiagate-the-reichswef-part-vi.html

Marburg: The Four Horseman, the Marburg Files, Snow White and Revolution – A Prussian Dream: Start @ 28:50 This is very interesting given the Good vs EVIL battle we are currently in.

A short free article by Will Zoll on the same topic.

Fairy-tale Anon: Marburg and the Grimm Tales of Child Abuse

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Finally going back centuries in history, we have a series by another Badlands associate. Given the time frame this is very speculative. However he brings up some interesting ideas and some nuggets of fact. He is also wrong about other things.

The Werewolf Game: On Languages and Cover-ups

Words are Precious Archeological Artifacts by American Hypnotist

…I’ve become more and more convinced over the years that mainstream history is a hypnotic spell. I frankly wonder if ANY of what we were told in school was true.

The same dark cabal that runs the Deep State today has likely been messing with our history for centuries—what we want to know is how and for what purpose.

99% of our job as Digital Soldiers is simply to know what’s going on!….

The Werewolf Game:

The Hidden Dimensions of Information Warfare by American Hypnotist

…many people generally don’t understand that an informed minority ALMOST ALWAYS defeats an uninformed majority in any information-based conflict/war….

American Hypnotist then gets into the psychology of the Cabal.

The Mindset of Evil

What is the “platonic form” of evil?

In my opinion, evil can be best described as unbounded parasitism.

Allow me to explain …

Seen from a “Darwinist” perspective, life itself is nothing more than a non-stop struggle for “domination”. I call this the eternal power struggle worldview. This is, indeed, the central belief of Marxism; it’s also the worldview that all psychopaths share on some level.

Power struggles are indeed a part of life, but the key difference between the perspective of psychopaths and non-psychopaths is that your average human being doesn’t define the entirety of existence by such power struggles (unless they’ve been trained to look at things in such away by a psychopathic education system/media complex/culture/family environment… but I digress). Either way, many people DO see things that way, and they’re living their lives accordingly.

The most intelligent of such people are quite capable of hiding their manipulative ploys behind a well-crafted façade. Sometimes, such people form “alliances” with each other.

Do you see where I’m going with this?

This mentality is one of the key factors driving the Deep State. It acts as a powerful unifier for all the slavers and dark occultists of the world in their quest to parasitize mankind as much as possible….

…brilliant psychologist, Andrew Lobaczewski, author ofPolitical Ponerology: the Science of Evil, had many up close encounters with psychopathic personality types as well, for he was an escapee from communist Poland. According to him, psychopaths feel oppressed by the common morality of the people, simply because they see no reason for it—they often quite literally see themselves as a “more evolved” version of humanity, because they’re “unburdened” by the “silly” moral considerations of normal folk.

Psychopathic personality types often deeply wish to take revenge out on the populace whose morality prevents them from pursuing the satisfaction of their appetites without impediment.[Think Pedophilia and cannabilism – GC]

…one of the driving features of the psychopathic personality type is the INABILITY to achieve satisfaction…

After defining psychopath/parasites he goes on to the Werewolf Game. Note it is a RUSSIAN who comes up with the concept for this game. A game that teaches how to analyze people.

…When it comes to an information war, oftentimes it’s the most innocent seeming “comms” that tell us the most—fairy tales and mythology almost certainly contain more clues than people tend to think. The very archetype of the Werewolf may indeed come from an ancient death cult that appears to have its origins in the Western Russia/Ukraine region. This cult was sometimes known as the “Koryos”, and they’d go on killing sprees under every full moon, usually wearing wolf-pelts on their heads.

Are you starting to see why I believe there’s something very profound going on here with the Werewolf Game? ..

That he brings up fairy tales is interesting because Will Zoll also points out the importance of the old fairy tales. See the Gunnels VIDEO above Prussiagate Files: Marburg, Snow White, Brothers Grimm starting at 40 minutes.

Another interesting article within the series:

The Werewolf Game – Hell On Earth

Something Weird is Going on at the Black Sea

…Did you know that the Black Sea has almost no oxygen in it? Not only that, but it glows red, and contains high levels of sulphur. Alas, the smell of sulphur is popularly associated with the presence of demons…

AND

Now, my first piece of evidence supporting the idea that hell is real comes from the research of Dr. Jerry Marzinski, a brave man who spent many decades as a therapist working with schizophrenic patients in maximum security prisons. After many years of working with these patients, he concluded that the voices schizophrenics hear in their minds are NOT hallucinations, but rather demonic entities who “infest” human beings.

According to his experience, these entities do this because they feed on negative emotions. Literally, they are hungry, and cannot produce their own energy—ergo, they need ours to “survive”.

Marzinski discovered, among other things, that the voices inevitably get VERY mad when you correctly identify their parasitic nature.Much like how a garden-variety narcissist or psychopath will react when you wise up to the games they play.

Alas, there is no profit in curing schizophrenia for the drug companies, and this is why you aren’t going to see any mainstream publications talk about Marzinski’s work.

Among other things, Marzinsky discovered that reciting Psalms 23 agitates the voices and makes them run away—he taught his patients to recite it until he was “found out” and told by the authorities that the only allowable method of “treatment” was to continue giving his patients drugs.

THAT certainly puts another twist on why the Cabal is adamant about pushing Russia out of that area and why Putin insists the Cabal is satanic.

From Part II

The Werewolf Game – Agents from Russia

…Whether it sounds plausible or not, the fact of the matter is that werewolf, vampire and zombie symbolism holds many keys to understanding the mindset of the Deep State death cult.

This cult is indeed a predator class that goes to great lengths to visit untold violence and torture upon innocent people. Pardon my candor, but if you want to be more than mere food for anything that eats you, then the onus is on you to become aware of predators in your midst….

There once was a time when “fairy tales” were used as a teaching tool to warn people about psychopathic personality types and the cults that such types create. Nowadays, many stories are told to accomplish the very opposite effect.

The “misunderstood psychopath” has become a trope in mainstream entertainment…..

…going all the way back to 3,000-2,000 BC, there existed a cult that had its home base right where Ukraine stands today, and which used the “wolf” as its main “theme”. This cult was known by many names, including but not limited to the Koryos and the Are-ans (due to worshipping a deity named “Ares”, which looks an awful lot like the words “Aryan” and “Aries”, if I do say so myself)….

From ancient times up until the year 1,000 AD, the Koryos would ride into Asia and Europe, marauding their more peaceful, agrarian neighbors—like many psychopathic types, they didn’t produce anything themselves, instead preferring to do drugs for half the year, in between raids. They’d go into a “berserk” trance under the full moon, and wore wolf pelts on their heads as they pillaged everything and everyone around them.

It would be a mistake to think that this cult disappeared centuries ago.

Among other places, the symbolism of this cult can be seen in the coat of arms for the Fabian Society, a prominent British socialist organization that officially formed in 1900, and that had a hand in the formation of the League of Nations (1919). Their membership included Walter Lippman, whose 1927 book Public Opinion goes into detail regarding the elites plans to use “democracy” as a smokescreen to mentally control the masses whilst convincing the masses that they are free…

Fabian Society’s coat of arms:

Rather blatant, isn’t it?

As we discussed in the previous article, psychopaths are “two faced”—That is to say, they wear a mask to blend in with normal society—indeed, most of us would become very skilled actors if we practiced the art of manipulation all day, every day, like psychopaths do. The symbolism here is important, because when we’re dealing with the dark occult practicing elites, we are indeed dealing with people who keep their “inner monster” hidden, and who also engage in ritualistic, cult violence…

… The ancient kingdom of Khazaria was also said to hail from this area, and there’s a tremendous amount of evidence that Khazaria and the werewolf cult are deeply connected. Khazaria was said to have pioneered horseback warfare, traveling in nomadic tribes, marauding nearby villages…

[The Author points to another tidbit I was not aware of. GC]

Vladimir Putin—another “Russian agent”, if you will—who recently told the world that,

“For centuries, [the cult] got used to stuffing their stomachs with human flesh and their pockets with money. But they must realize that this ‘ball of vampires’ is coming to an end.”

When Putin calls them “vampires”, I’m certain he’s talking about one and the same cult that I’ve been talking about, which is likely the same cult that is variously called the Illuminati, the NWO, Satanists, Luciferians, the Babylonian Brotherhood, etc. by popular culture….

This author maybe doing a bit of a stretch in some areas. I certainly have problems with some of his ideas, but there is this:

“Sviatoslav’s Council of War,” by Boris Chorikov, 1836. Around the year 965, after centuries of traveling merchants being ambushed and murdered by cut-throats in the modern-day nation of Ukraine, an alliance was formed between Christians and Muslims. Led by the [Kievan-Rus] Grand Prince of Kiev, Sviatoslav I, the proto-Russians fought alongside the Byzantines and the Turks (all former enemies) to destroy the Khazarian Empire, which had rejected all three Abrahamic religions, instead practicing the profane art of blood magic from ancient Babylon, worshiping the satanic deity, Ba’al. Defeating this existential threat required an alliance of old sworn enemies. (They had all previously failed on their own.)

Image and quote swiped from Ghost of Based Patrick Henry : https://badlands.substack.com/p/horseshoe-theory-part-1

And we have this from RUSSIA.

1050 years ago Svyatoslav squads defeated the state of the Khazars July 3 2015

1050 years ago, in the summer of 965, the great Russian prince Svyatoslav Igorevich defeated the Khazar army and took the capital of the Khazar Kaganate, Itil. The lightning strike of the Russian troops with the support of the Allied Pechenegs led to the collapse of the parasitic Khazar state. Russ committed a sacred revenge, destroying the Khazar “snake”…

Khazar threat

The fight against the parasitic state of the Khazars was the most important strategic task of Russia. The trade and usurious elite of Khazaria, who subjugated the Khazar tribal military nobility, held in their hands all the exits from Eastern Europe to the East. The Khazar state received huge profits by controlling transit routes.

The Khazar Khaganate represented a serious military threat to Russia. Archaeologists have discovered a whole system of stone fortresses on the right bank of the Don, North Donets and Oskol. One white-stone stronghold was located at a distance of 10-20 kilometers from the other. The outposts were located on the right, western and northwestern banks of the rivers. An important role in the construction of these fortresses was played by Byzantine engineers. So, Sarkel (Belaya Vezha) on the bank of the Don was built by Byzantine engineers led by Petron Kamatir. Yes, and strengthened Itil Byzantines-Romans. The Khazar state played an important role in the military-political strategy of Constantinople, holding back Russia….

The Khazars made campaigns and raids in the Slavic-Russian lands. Arab geographer Al-Idrisi reported that Khazar vassals regularly made raids on the Slavs, in order to steal people for sale into slavery. These were not just spontaneous raids, from time to time, but a deliberate predatory strategy on the part of the parasite state. In the Khazar state, the power was seized by the Jews representing the caste of rakhdonites (radanity). This caste of international traders controlled trade between East and West, including the Silk Road and other communications. Their influence extended all the way to China and India. One of their main “goods” were people. The slave clan worshiped the “golden calf” and measured everything in gold.…

Certainly makes you wonder what history Putin has access to. To bad Tucker Carlson cut him off.

Next week I will get into the rabbithole I discovered when looking for the John Maynard Keynes Fabian connection.

Dear KMAG: 20241230 Trump Won Three Times ❀ Open Topic

Joe Biden never won. This is our Real President – 45, 46, 47.