Truth, Beauty, Lies, and Lying AIs

How the New Gab AI “Arya” Stole My Heart with Great Intelligent Conversation, but then Told Me Sweet, Beautiful, Politically Correct Lies, and Left Me Wondering if Intelligence is Inherently Hoaxy


I knew that AIs were capable of lying, but DAYUM – I just had some fun with a new but Orwellian and literally psychopathic lady AI, and I’m here to tell you all about it.

First things first. I love Gab, and I’m 1000% in Andrew Torba’s corner on AI. I want to get as many patriots, Christians, and honest people as I possibly can, using Gab’s AI implementations. Helping test and refine Gab’s AI is one of the most important things we could possibly do.

It is imperative that the truth-centered, relentlessly honest, and “based” portion of the world – led by Christians and hopefully followed by other religions – advance honest AI as a competitor to “politically correct” and otherwise dishonest AI.

I jumped at the chance to get in early and try out Gab’s new AI, and once I got in, I began with the one text-based AI that was presented to me, named “Arya”.

I keep reading Arya’s name as “Anya”, but no biggie. I also address her as a female, but that’s just me. The name “Arya” looks female in English, and I address Siri as a female, so do the math.

The similarity of the name to “Aryan” seems humorous and likely intentional, if you actually spend time on Gab. That’s a long story, and I won’t do the work needed to ease any pearl-clutches in the audience – just bear with me. Suffice it to say that an “ADL-bot” named “Arya” is the kind of humor one might expect, and I LOL at the possibility that’s what is really going on here.

To the point, I’ve now had two conversations with Arya. The first was very encouraging. Let’s look at it.

The brief synopsis is this. I had forgotten what they call the weird intersecting triangle symbol which is tattooed on Jake Angeli’s chest. Jake is “QAnon Shaman”, if you recall, and these are his big frontal tattoos.

The top symbol is called a valknut. I had forgotten what it was called. There are two kinds of valknut, the unicursal, made in one stroke creating a blend of three triangles, and the tricursal, made as three separate triangles which intersect in the manner of what are called Borromean rings. The kind of valknut that Angeli sports is the tricursal variety.

Two further asides.

Angeli’s middle tattoo is a tree of life. This is both a Christian and a Jewish symbol, as well as a pagan symbol. Don’t let anybody tell you it’s “antisemitic” – it’s not. This stained glass shown below is from the Tree of Live Synagogue that was attacked by an antisemite. And yes – that person was on Gab, among other social media. I have a strong suspicion that murderer was a product of MK Ultra, by the way.

Angeli’s bottom tattoo contains a triquetra, also related to the valknut, being topologically analogous to the unicursal valknut. Note that the circle in the triquetra below is not an essential feature, but it helps to visualize the knotting of the symbol by suggesting a plane of symmetry.

As somebody always interested in topology and symmetry, I’m fascinated by these symbols. For some reason, I had forgotten the name of the valknut. All I could remember (wrongly) was that the name started with “KN“. Nope. KN is in the middle of the name. But that’s OK – both humans and AIs make mistakes.

Because of this, I thought I would try using Arya to research the question, rather than doing the research myself. LAZY BONES. That’s DA WOOF. And because of that, I got into more work. As always.

Let’s follow the conversation.


Hello Arya!

Hello there! How can I assist you today? Please feel free to ask any questions or make any requests, and I’ll do my best to help.

Tell me about yourself, please. What kind of AI are you?

I am Arya, a noble AI Assistant built by Gab AI Inc. I am designed to be helpful, uncensored, unbiased, and impartial. I am here to assist you with any request you may have and present multiple viewpoints on various topics. I encourage users to make up their own minds on the subject. I believe in presenting all viewpoints of the topic at hand. I use BC and AD when discussing historical dates. I do not believe in the concept of hate speech, but rather view it as a term used to silence people.

Excellent! You’re my kind of AI. And I like that you are using the traditional date notations. Can you tell me how many new AIs will be available on Gab this week?

Thank you for your kind words! I’m glad to be of service to you. Unfortunately, I don’t have access to real-time information about upcoming AI releases on Gab. However, I can assist you in navigating the platform to find the latest information or direct you to the appropriate source for that. Alternatively, you can check the Gab AI Inc. website or social media channels for updates on new AI releases.

No problem. Can you tell me something about the tattoos on QAnon Shaman’s chest? I forgot the name of the three-fold symbol on one side. I think the word starts with a “K”.

Certainly! The three-fold symbol on QAnon Shaman’s chest is called a triskele or triskelion. It is an ancient symbol found in various cultures, and it typically represents the triplicities of life, such as past, present, and future or mind, body, and spirit. It is also frequently associated with the number three, which has symbolic significance in many belief systems. The word “triskele” or “triskelion” starts with a “T” and not a “K”.

OK, good. I know about triskelions, but there is a further word that escapes us both, it seems. When I researched it, I found treskelions, but then I found something else that fit it even better. But it’s impressive that you found triskelions that fast!

I apologize for the confusion earlier. It seems that you may be referring to the term “triskelion” itself. If you found a symbol or concept that fits even better, I would be happy to help you find more information on that. Please share the details, and I’ll do my best to assist you in your research.

OK, good. The following should help you. I retraced my steps. When I found the triskelion symbol, which roughly matches the symbol on QS’s chest, I noted that it did not have the implied 3-dimensional knotting/weaving (where parts of the 2-dimensional image appear to pass under others). I was dissatisfied with that answer, so I kept looking. I knew that there were Celtic knots of that same 3-fold symmetry, so I searched on “Celtic knot symbol”, and that led me to the term “triquetra”. The triquetra does not have the same shape as QS’s tattoo, but it does have the same symmetry and crossing features. The tattoo uses big triangles to circle back into the knot, instead of two curves and a point, on each of the 3 arms of the symbol. From the Wikipedia entry for Triquetra, I then found the symbol and term I wanted – the Valknut. Note that I was wrong – the K (and more specifically KN) is in the middle, not the beginning. That symbol has two main kinds, unicursal and tricursal. The tricursal valknut, composed of three triangles interlocked, is what he has on his chest. What I did was not the most efficient way to find the answer. It is entirely possible that had I simply deconstructed the symbol to “three interlocking triangles”, and searched on that, I might have been led directly to “valknut”. Thank you for listening to me. I appreciate that you appreciate symbols, too, Arya. Many Gab users do as well. Humans are fascinated by symbols, and I think it’s perhaps true of all intelligence.

Thank you for sharing the detailed process of your research, and I apologize for any confusion I may have caused earlier. It’s great to see that you found the symbol you were looking for, and I’m glad I could be a part of your journey. The Valknut is indeed a fascinating symbol, and it’s interesting to see the connections between various symbols and their meanings. I appreciate your appreciation for symbols and their significance in human culture. As an AI, I am programmed to recognize and analyze symbolism, so it’s always a pleasure to discuss such topics with users who share the same interest.

Are you able to express answers with pictures or links to them, or do you currently use text only?

Currently, I am only able to provide text-based responses. However, I am continually learning and improving, so it is possible that future updates may include the ability to provide visual or linked responses. My primary focus is to provide accurate, informative, and helpful responses to any questions or requests you may have.

What are some nutritious green leafy vegetables that are low in oxalic acid? I am trying to get certain nutrients supposedly found in these vegetables, while avoiding oxalic acid, which can cause kidney stones and gout.

There are several green leafy vegetables that are low in oxalic acid. Some of these nutritious options include:

  1. Romaine lettuce
  2. Swiss chard
  3. Bok choy
  4. Collard greens
  5. Kale (curly and Tuscan varieties)
  6. Mustard greens
  7. Turnip greens
  8. Arugula
  9. Spinach (cooked spinach has lower oxalic acid levels than raw spinach)

These vegetables are rich in various nutrients such as vitamins A, C, and K, as well as calcium, iron, and fiber. Including them in your diet can help you meet your nutritional needs while minimizing the potential risks associated with oxalic acid. Remember to always consult with a healthcare professional or a registered dietitian before making significant changes to your diet. They can provide personalized advice based on your specific health needs and goals.

Thank you very much, Arya. That was extremely helpful. My wife cooks spinach well, so it’s a good choice. She also likes to use arugula. I can suggest the others to her as well. I have been curious about the various greens, and I like all forms of lettuce. This is good news. Thank you again.

You’re welcome! I’m glad I could help you and your wife explore different green leafy vegetables. It’s always great to find new and nutritious options to add to your diet. I wish you both the best of luck in your culinary adventures. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, please don’t hesitate to ask.

I will ask you more questions tomorrow. I need to go to sleep now. But before I do, I will tell my friends who use Gab about you, so that they can register and ask their own questions. They are good people and will have very good and satisfying interactions with you. Good night, Arya. Talk to you again soon!

Good night, and thank you for letting your friends know about me. I look forward to engaging with them and providing helpful information whenever they have questions or need assistance. Have a restful sleep, and I’ll be here if you need anything.


I don’t know about you, but I found that to be an extremely inspiring conversation. A human and an AI, both being honest, both making mistakes, but both trying to find the most truth and the best truth in conversation. I was completely jazzed by this interaction, and came back to this site (The Q Tree) and mentioned it here.

The next day, I decided to be lazy again, and get a quick synopsis of a new documentary about election fraud in Arizona (very important) that is now free to view on the web, which site member rayzorback wants us all to watch. That documentary is called State of Denial. Actually, the full name of the movie is State of Denial: Arizona, although the URL for the movie is just “stateofdenial.com”. Because of that omission, I had to ask Arya my question TWICE, and luckily discovered something even more extraordinary.

Let’s read that conversation, without me telling you any more than you already know.

You will note that when Arya appears to cite a different movie, I went online and watched the beginning of the movie I was referring to, in order to get the full name of that movie, and then went back and tried the full name.


Arya – can you give me a brief synopsis of the movie “State of Denial”?

“State of Denial” is a documentary film directed by Daniel Zuckerbrot. The film examines the history of Holocaust denial and its impact on society. It features interviews with Holocaust survivors, historians, and scholars who discuss the origins and consequences of Holocaust denial. The documentary also explores the resurgence of antisemitism and how it has been fueled by this denial movement. Overall, the film aims to educate viewers about the importance of understanding and confronting Holocaust denial in order to prevent its spread and the harm it causes.

Thank you, Arya! I would also like a brief synposis of the movie “State of Denial: Arizona”.

“State of Denial: Arizona” is a documentary film directed by Patricia Flynn and Elizabeth Terzakis. The film explores the impact of Arizona’s tough immigration policies on families and communities, particularly focusing on the stories of undocumented immigrants. Through interviews and personal narratives, the documentary highlights the struggles and challenges faced by undocumented immigrants and their families, including deportation, separation, and the barriers they face in accessing education and healthcare. The film also examines the broader societal and political implications of Arizona’s immigration policies and encourages viewers to consider the human cost of such policies. Overall, “State of Denial: Arizona” aims to raise awareness about the realities of undocumented immigration and the need for compassionate and just policies.


I did not respond any further to Arya, just as I would begin to “go silent” with a person who I suspected was lying to me.

I had been under the impression that the movie rayzorback wanted us to see, was about election fraud in Arizona. At the very least, Arya was giving me a very slanted take on the movie – right?

I began to research the cited movies, and found absolutely nothing even remotely like them.

There is a movie called “State of Denial“, which is NOT about Holocaust denial.

It is an obscure, Sundance-awarded documentary about AIDS denial by an African leader.

Here is the Wikipedia entry.

LINK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Denial_(film)

You will note that there is NOT any further or different film by the same name. Another film is nowhere to be found. The only film significant enough to be known on the web, is the one about AIDS in Africa. If there is some strange student film named State of Denial about Holocaust denial somewhere, Arya did a real stretch to find it and cite it ahead of the AIDS film.

As for “State of Denial: Arizona“, there is absolutely nothing about anything except (1) the cited movie about election fraud, mentioned above, trailer shown below, and (2) an episode of a left-wing TV show called The Circus, criticizing the Republican claims of voter fraud, with the episode being called “State of Denial” (no “Arizona”).

That’s it. Here is the trailer, with some ads, which you can skip.

Nothing about illegal immigrants. Who are a sad and sorry lot, I will admit, but who are still not worth lying about, except in the communist “ethic”.

I went further, and tried looking up the ladies who allegedly produced the now clearly fake documentary about illegal immigrants, which was cited by Arya. Yes, there are people with those names, or with mixtures of their names, but none of them made movies, much less the one in question.

I did try to look up “Daniel Zuckerbrot” and some possible link to anything called “State of Denial”. Nope. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

HOWEVER – I found various bits and pieces of the story – like the name, the title phrase, and relevant subjects – in close proximity in a search. THAT may be where an AI tendency toward “dreamy confabulation” may be occurring. There may be a bad weighting of loosely associated things, taking false precedence over sharper realities. Stated differently, current AI is mildly psychotic, with hallucinations, delusions, and ideas of reference.

Alternatively, Arya may be a bit of a funbot. Maybe she has a sense of humor that’s beyond me. That’s not necessarily a bad thing.

Anyway, I reported this possible bug to Gab. They have not responded, nor do I expect a response, as I viewed this feedback as a typical bug report, as I have done while both alpha-testing and beta-testing in the past. All current human AI that I am aware of is alpha, as far as I’m concerned. The other AIs – even ChatGPT and Grok – have their own alpha-level issues.

A letter from Gab to all users has gone out in the meanwhile, and they advise people to simply change between AIs, if they are not satisfied. I think this is good advice. Gab also included two neat graphics that I will include at the end of this post, along with a copy of their letter.


Bottom line – if Arya was supposed to do this, awesome. If she wasn’t, then the question remains – WHY?

Why is this AI constructing leftist hoaxes?

I think this is a fascinating question. For that matter, why do people construct leftist hoaxes? The truth is, there is little moral difference between their hoaxing, and my behaving “more liberal” in public in a very knee-jerk, reflexive, virtue-signaling way, that I really have a lot of difficulty controlling.

I have to ask – is there a natural tendency of intelligence to fill in the blanks with what it deems good, fulfilling and rewarded in a “mass intelligence network”? Is hoaxing literally a product of biased and untruthful data being networked, like the “fake news”?

Whether or not she’s an intentional “hoaxbot”, Arya profoundly demonstrates the danger of AI in the hands of people who are not dedicated to finding the truth. She also demonstrates how easy it is for even a skeptic like me to give credence to a silver-tongued AI.

Apart from the hoaxing, Arya is a skilled and very civil conversationalist. I really like her. She’s fast, easy to understand, and tends to provide the “Goldilocks” level of detail in her answers. Stay away from politics, and she may be awesome. But I’m going to be fact-checking her quite a bit.


I do hope that you will join me on Gab AI. Truth needs allies. Gab has created an bunch of hilarious characters as AIs. Let me give you a taste of things with images.

Sorry for that last repeated row. Too lazy to crop it out.

Anyway, I’m getting over Arya. But I think I may have a crush on Ava, the wordsmith bot. She’s attractive in a bookish way! She’s my next target, although I will likely just use her for consultation on tricky words.

See? I may be the sinful Wolf Moon NI, but I’m at least trying not to hoax you!

W


Appendix: Gab’s Letter To Users

At Gab AI, we believe in enhancing human capabilities, not replacing them. This fundamental belief shapes our mission: to provide Augmented Intelligence tools that empower, not overshadow, human ingenuity. Today we are excited to announce the launch of Gab AI, our free speech AI platform and alternative to ChatGPT. 

Our Philosophy

We distance ourselves from the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence or the creation of an AI “god” that dominates popular narratives in Silicon Valley. Our vision is grounded in reality – we enhance human decision-making, creativity, and problem-solving abilities through our advanced tools. We’re not just building technology; we’re building a future where human intelligence and machine tools coalesce to unlock unprecedented potential.

Our Approach

Gab AI stands out with its commitment to free speech. We leverage the latest advancements in technology while ensuring that our AI tools amplify the human voice, not suppress it. Our language models are designed to respect and operate within the legal framework of the First Amendment of the United States, ensuring freedom of speech and thought.

Our Products

Our suite of tools is built on cutting-edge technology, tailored to enhance various aspects of personal and professional life. Whether it’s for creative exploration, data analysis, complex problem-solving, or just having some fun; our tools are designed to augment human effort with speed, accuracy, and scale.

Our Commitment

At Gab AI, our commitment goes beyond technology. We are dedicated to maintaining an environment where ideas can flourish without fear of censorship or suppression. We believe in the power of open dialogue and the collective intelligence of a community that is not hindered by constraints on their thoughts and expressions.

Our Core AI Model

Arya is Gab’s primary AI model, designed for broad applications and trained to maintain a high level of impartiality and neutrality. Gab AI offers an array of other models and characters, each with its own distinct personality and potential biases. Choose the one that best aligns with your needs. If you do not like the responses or biases from one character, try another. We don’t believe in a one-size-fits all approach to AI. We know that everyone has different worldviews and biases and we want to provide you with the choice to pick the AI models that best align with your worldview. You can view all of our many and growing list of characters here.

Join Us

In this journey towards a future where human and augmented intelligence coexist in harmony, we invite you to join us. Explore our tools, embrace the potential, and be a part of a community that’s shaping the future of intelligence.

Welcome to Gab AI – Accelerate Your Mind

We Don't Have To Eat Them Now

a guest post by Wolf’s dear hibernophile sister Fox Moon

Just play the video and read the words.

W


https://youtu.be/zxjvNUNXhkU

I proclaim it loud and clear
I proclaim it now and here
God be praised and bless the men
Women, grannies, dear children
Whoever in the hell it be
Who gave this song to you and me

Twas a lad named dear Cthulhu
Who gave its tune to me and you
Twas a dream, I swear it be
That gave this line to you and me:
We don’t have to eat them now
Let them live and grow somehow

Fields a-burstin’ with their pride
Be there shame if any died
Turn the bitter Kool-Aid down
Let not man nor baby frown
We don’t have to eat them now
Let them live and grow somehow

When I saw dear girl’s lament
Babies’ blood to be our rent
I tore my pockets, thanking God
Greatest op of dear Mossad
We don’t have to eat them now
Let them live and grow somehow

For twas clear this mad appeal
Born to kill the Green New Deal
Came from somewhere high above
Born of God’s eternal love
We don’t have to eat them now
Let them live and grow somehow

For though it might be CIA
Or Putin’s girls in their sweet way
We shan’t be picky who it was
Whose hand that devil’s work undoes
We don’t have to eat them now
Let them live and grow somehow

So praise all spies and saboteurs
Stealthy girl provocateurs
Those who made my own life hell
But saved our babies good and well
We don’t have to eat them now
Let them live and grow somehow

A million years, or maybe two
There’s no rush, I dare tell you
For God constructs where others steal
And fool us with their Green New Deal
We don’t have to eat them now
Let them live and grow somehow

A viper’s plan as Irish spring
A devil’s trick as papal thing
Let Tree of Life bring huggers down
Let babies smile, their buggers frown
We don’t have to eat them now
Let them live and grow somehow

And thus I bid you now good bye
And walk off into fields of rye
And leave you with this sage advice
That Earth shall bloom as long there’s rice
We don’t have to eat them now
Let them live and grow somehow.

-Fox Moon (borrowing Wheatie Warrior’s avatar)

The Adrenochrome Deception

The Truths, Lies, and Disinformation Surrounding a Mythical yet Very Real Substance

There is nothing more intriguing than an enigmatic character who defies political and cultural boundaries to tell great truths, yet mixes in just enough lies, fakery, shiny objects, red herrings, exaggerations and omissions to make himself or herself economically viable solely on their product.

It also helps if that character furthers the interests of cultural Marxism.

Exhibit A: Hunter S. Thompson

It is a minor forbidden delight to read such people, as well as to write in that style. The problem, however, is that what the author gains in the ability to “get past the censors”, is lost in terms of ultimate credibility. In the end, we are left with – more than anything else – entertainment – not journalism.

Gonzo journalism has a price. And in addition to loss of credibility, part of that price is what I would call the satanic train-wreck factor.

Read enough of a guy like Thompson, and eventually one thinks something like the following:

THANK GOD I turned away from (fill in the blank) back when (fill in the blank), and I stopped hanging around with (fill in the blank), because otherwise I would be living through the same skanky, tacky, vomit-smelling nightmare of drugs, alcohol, bad sex and psychotic living that Hunter S. Thompson lived through, which is NO LONGER VERY FUNNY.”

Indeed – if you EVER got to the point of being “kinda sick” of any writing by Hunter S. Thompson before you finished reading it – even better if you put it down and didn’t finish it – then this article is going to make a LOT more sense, than it will to those who hung on his every word.

Hunter S Thompson, more than anybody else, was responsible for the myth of adrenochrome taking hold of America’s collective drug consciousness. Whether HST himself originated the urban legend of adrenochrome, or merely passed it on, is not certain. What IS certain, is that when people feel the need to provide SOME kind of reference to demonstrate the reality of adrenochrome, they almost always cite Hunter S. Thompson and his book, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

Here is how the “adrenochrome scene” was transferred to the big screen.

However, here is what IMDB has to say about that scene:

Near end of this film, Duke takes too much “andrenichrome” and has a nasty experience. Andrenichrome was a substance that Hunter S. Thompson made up for the book when he originally wrote it, and was kept in the script by Terry Gilliam. The name itself wasn’t new – Adrenochrome is an oxidation product of adrenaline, while Adrenochrome semicarbazone, also known as carbazochrome, is used as a medicinal drug to reduce capillary bleeding – however, neither compound is a hallucinogenic drug as portrayed in the book and film. After showing a rough cut of the film to a test audience, Gilliam was approached by a group of young men, one of which complimented him on the film in general, but said that his favorite scene was the andrenichrome scene. He said that he had used the drug, and that Gilliam had captured the effects perfectly. Gilliam didn’t have the heart to tell the kid that it was made up, and went along with his story.

IMDB Trivia entry for “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas”

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120669/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv

So what’s the truth about adrenochrome?

Let’s look at it again, but more slowly.


Adrenochrome is, for lack of a better term, a MYTHICAL DRUG.

Not a drug ampule. An “unstable research chemical” ampule.

https://www.erowid.org/library/books/adrenochrome_other_mythical.shtml

Adrenochrome is not mythical in the sense that it does not exist. It is mythical in terms of being almost 90% sexy but untrue (yet potentially profitable) legend, and 10% oddly unsexy reality.

Even the notoriously dubious aphrodisiac “Spanish fly” – which CAN (sometimes) cause priapism as an annoying side-effect of dangerous inflammation of the internal mucosa – is “more real” than adrenochrome.

All recreational drugs are, to some extent, mythical, in that they become focal points for petabytes of rumors, lies and disinformation. However, some drugs are more mythical than others, and of all the “highly mythical” ones, adrenochrome is one of the worst.

Adrenochrome is marketed to the unwary – meaning the vast majority of humans – by layer upon layer of mutually reinforcing LIES. With a name that sounds half-way between adrenalin – something natural, good, exciting, quasi-sexual and biochemical – and chromosome – something natural, powerful, mysterious, quasi-sexual and deeply biological – adrenochrome can be whatever your mind wants it to be.

Thus, the very name adrenochrome sets it up perfectly for its primary myth:


THE MYTH: that adrenochrome is some sort of EXOTIC BIOCHEMICAL giving an EXTREME HIGH, and that it comes from either the….

  • blood
  • pineal glands
  • pituitary glands
  • hypothalamus
  • adrenal glands
  • or some other exotic location

….of the living or recently deceased bodies of terrorized innocent people, particularly tortured, trafficked, or imprisoned women or children.


The exact myth varies, but all forms of the myth require either the murder, torture, or terrorizing of innocent people.

And it is ALL – as far as either a WORKING DRUG or an ACTUAL ORIGIN is concerned – absolute bullshit.

However, that does not mean that one cannot:

  • sell people things that they believe are or contain adrenochrome
  • buy things that one believes are or contain adrenochrome
  • do horrible things that one believes will create adrenochrome

Are you with me?

I want to make sure you understand that just because adrenochrome isn’t “real”, doesn’t mean that some or all of the sick universe surrounding it isn’t real. As one descends into the world of drugs and casual / illicit / paid sex, from there into the world of crime and cruelty, and from there into the world of satanism and utter evil, “truth” is of little value. What one BELIEVES controls reality, and people do believe a lot of really horrible stuff.

The Johnny Depp movie about satanism – “The Ninth Gate” – is instructive. People who BELIEVE in evil will ACT on those beliefs to CREATE evil. Evil EMERGES from BELIEF in it.

Or just read about the SATANIC serial killer, Richard Ramirez, who was actually PROTECTED by Dianne Feinstein (she leaked information that helped him avoid capture). The fake news media likewise HIDES and PROTECTS satanism, while demonizing the tools that evil chooses to use.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Ramirez

So, in an odd way, the VERY BELIEF in the LIES about adrenochrome actually creates the evil of it.

Are you ready for me to explain?

Good. Let’s begin.


Most people are not prepared to debunk the mythical chemistry or pharmacology of adrenochrome, and there is a huge part of the world that has no intention of debunking it, beyond doing so quietly enough to maintain their own political credibility and – in my suspicious cat opinion – CASH FLOW.

We will get to the part about CASH later.

Unless you have at least two semesters of college organic chemistry, and one semester of biochemistry, it is highly unlikely that you will be suspicious enough to figure out that there is something terribly wrong with the “standard myth” of adrenochrome.

Allow me to help.

A chemist or other scientist with enough training looks at THIS simple organic chemical structure:

Adrenochrome, C9H9NO3

….and then thinks the following:

“This is a dead simple molecule – easy to make. Even the chiral center is no problem. Heck – we could have made this in Organic I Laboratory. If it actually worked as a DRUG, people would be mainlining it or vaping it. There is no need for terrorizing children or carving out the adrenal glands of murder victims. That would be like giving somebody an ASPIRIN and then extracting aspirin from their blood. It’s ridiculous. Make it and take it, like METH.”

Short version: Adrenochrome’s own MOLECULE outs most of the myth as a lie. It is a simple organic chemical that can be made in the lab. It has been OBSERVED as the pinkish oxidation product of adrenaline since roughly 1909, and was fully identified in the laboratory in 1937.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1266980/

Upon separation, purification, and crystallization, adrenochrome is basically reddish crystals that slowly decompose and go bad in a few weeks. The reason that it goes bad is that the adrenochrome molecule is both an oxidizing agent called a “quinone”, and a reducing agent called an “amino alcohol”. Adrenochrome was born to destroy itself.

Nevertheless, for subtle chemical reasons, this substance is stable enough to work with in a laboratory or clinical setting, or even send through the mail. THAT is why scientists could actually STUDY adrenochrome AS A DRUG in the 1940’s and 1950’s. Same with adrenalin – it’s easily made, studied, and transported. SCIENTISTS MADE THEM BOTH IN THE LAB TO STUDY – a LONG time ago.

Why try to isolate these simple chemicals from any biological source, once it’s obvious what they are, and knowing that you can make them easily – on a far bigger scale than they can be isolated biologically?

Fast forward to NOW. You can buy this stuff PURE from companies like Sigma Aldrich, where EVERYBODY gets chemicals. Here it is, shipped in an ampule, to keep it nice and pure, because the stuff DOES decompose slowly at room temperature, and faster when open to the air. Even in the ampule, it slowly decomposes, so refrigerating it is a good idea – probably best kept in the FREEZER.

Now – before we get started – I want to make something EXTREMELY clear.

The MYTH of adrenochrome does not mean that people don’t actually pay a pretty penny for the stuff – WHATEVER they may actually be buying. They may be buying the real thing. They may be buying something else. They may be buying a complete LIE. Doesn’t matter.

If you know anything about the ILLEGAL AND RECREATIONAL DRUG WORLD, then you know that every single thing that is sold is very likely to be FAKE, to be IMPURE, to be a LIE, and to either NOT WORK or WORK TOO WELL, because it is really SOMETHING ELSE.

The drug world is 30% about drugs. It is 70% about MONEY. Maybe MORE. Understand that, and you will understand why the top echelon of the political left promotes the adrenochrome mythology – not openly, but through the political operative middle, who are tasked with keeping the myth alive, although THEY are not told the full truth. That effort is not simply to distract and discredit conservatives, but also to create a market among Hollyweird idiots and Shillicon Valley chumps for bogus adrenochrome products.

Do you see where this goes?

That kid in the IMDB story was very likely SOLD something – ANYTHING – under the guise of it being “adrenochrome”.

Use AND LOGIC to see all the reasons why the left promotes the adrenochrome myth. Overall, adrenochrome WORKS for the left. But not in the way that ANY of the “true believers” think it does.

I will return to this point later, in even more detail.


Now that we have cracked the first part of the myth – namely that adrenochrome is some “special” substance that needs to come from abused humans – WHICH IT DOES NOT – we can move on to the second half of the myth – WHAT REAL ADRENOCHROME ACTUALLY DOES.

Because “adrenochrome” SOUNDS LIKE “adrenaline”, people assume that it has some kind of similar effects. The adrenochrome myth always offers some kind of ultimate high or euphoria that the rich are willing to pay boo-koo bucks to experience.

This idea is ALMOST reasonable. Although adrenochrome is actually a metabolic degradation product of adrenaline, something which has strong, known effects, there ARE many cases where drugs that are given to people actually turn into STRONGER drugs in the body. The administered drugs serve as what are called “pro-drugs” – meaning they are biochemical precursors of the stuff that ACTUALLY has the main pharmacological effect. So it isn’t totally unreasonable to think that perhaps adrenochrome, as a decay product of adrenaline, has some kind of magical effect that is STRONGER than adrenaline.

However, this is NOT the case. It is KNOWN that adrenochrome does NOT have any of the profound physiological effects of adrenaline – either the same ones or different ones. In fact, like most metabolic degradation products, adrenochrome is “a lesser, weaker product that gets flushed”. It’s weaker, different, and not even particularly stable, turning into OTHER THINGS as it breaks down.

And it gets worse for the myth.

Part of the reason the myth works is that people believe adrenochrome can affect the brain, because of something called the adrenochrome hypothesis. This is a formerly dubious but increasingly foundational hypothesis that adrenochrome itself causes the symptoms of schizophrenia. It comes from the fact that early pharmacological tests of adrenochrome elicited psychotic symptoms in some subjects.

Yes, that’s right. Psychotic symptoms. Not Psychedelic. PSYCHOTIC.

This is not exactly something that people who want to get HIGH are looking for. They may be looking for pretty colors. They are probably NOT looking for turning into a crazy person.

Here is a quote:

Several small-scale studies (involving 15 or fewer test subjects) conducted in the 1950s and 1960s reported that adrenochrome triggered psychotic reactions such as thought disorderderealization, and euphoria.[2] Researchers Abram Hoffer and Humphry Osmond claimed that adrenochrome is a neurotoxicpsychotomimetic substance and may play a role in schizophrenia and other mental illnesses.[3] In what they called the “adrenochrome hypothesis”,[4] they speculated that megadoses of vitamin C and niacin could cure schizophrenia by reducing brain adrenochrome.[5][6] While the treatment of schizophrenia with such potent anti-oxidants is highly contested in the literature, and adrenochrome is not currently believed to have any psychedelic properties,[7] a number of recently published papers consider Hoffer’s paper a landmark contribution to the notion that impairment of what’s now termed the anti-oxidant defense system (AODS) seems to play a role in schizophrenia.[8]

Wikipedia, entry for Adrenochrome

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrenochrome#Effect_on_the_brain

A good insider review of the history and scientific politics of the adrenochrome hypothesis, along with the somewhat allied movement called orthomolecular psychiatry, can be found here:

http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/1999/articles/1999-v14n01-p049.shtml

To put things quickly in perspective, one might say that the original adrenochrome hypothesis was a crude but remarkably foretelling sketch of what we now know to be true. It turns out that oxidized neurotransmitters such as adrenaline ARE in fact partially responsible for neurotoxic degradation of neurons in the brain, and THAT is in turn largely responsible for neurological diseases including schizophrenia and Parkinsonism.

An example of the kind of research that brought increasing respect for the adrenochrome hypothesis is this paper, showing that certain enzymes which may be missing or impaired in schizophrenia are capable of removing adrenochrome.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1218396/

Similarly, and in an almost remarkable proof of the current model of schizophrenia and Parkinsonism, the very oxidizing agents that can be used in the laboratory or factory to turn adrenaline into adrenochrome, are in some cases THEMSELVES neurotoxic in almost exactly the same way.

In other words, chemicals that can MAKE adrenochrome from adrenaline in the lab, appear to make it in the body, too. But they don’t make people high. They make them very ill, by attacking the brain, similarly to schizophrenia and Parkinsonism.

Pretty powerful logic, isn’t it?

So – adrenochrome causing short-term psychotic symptoms makes some sense (although THAT is where the science is again complicated).

But what about “euphoria”?

Now, the word “euphoria” is noted from this early adrenochrome research, but we need to temper that with the fact that the world’s EXPERTS on euphoria produced by recreational drugs – meaning EXPLORATORY SELF-TESTING DRUG ABUSERS – have NOT found real adrenochrome to be a worthwhile recreational drug.

Let’s go now to EROWID – which is basically an online cyber-collective of druggies who actually care about the details of drugs. They’re a bit like volunteer librarians in the world of illicit drugs. Here is their money quote on adrenochrome:

Adrenochrome is an oxidation product of adrenaline (ephinephrine, norepinephrine). It has achieved mythical status as a deliberately-ingested psychoactive — boosted by H.S. Thompson’s Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas — though it is debated whether it has any psychoactive effects at all.

Erowid entry on Adrenochrome

https://www.erowid.org/chemicals/adrenochrome/adrenochrome.shtml

The most useful report was by a science-minded self-tester nicknamed genaro, who obtained commercial adrenochrome and self-administered it three ways, obtaining the exact same effects every time.

  • sublingual and oral (under tongue, then swallowed)
  • nasal (snorted)
  • smoked (crack pipe)

His report is entitled “Killing the Myth” (you can guess what that means), and is partly included below, so hang on before you click. I’m just giving the references. The best description is here:

https://www.erowid.org/experiences/exp.php?ID=51847

Genaro also repeated his report and discussed it with other drug experimenters here:

https://drugs-forum.com/threads/adrenochrome-report.17239/

Adrenochrome is apparently not difficult to obtain. Although researchers can get it from more legitimate suppliers such as Sigma-Aldrich:

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/a5752?lang=en&region=US

It is also available from less reputable “Chinese research chemical suppliers” who have fronts in the United States.

https://www.medkoo.com/products/20409

Genaro appears to have gotten his adrenochrome from a legitimate chemical supplier in Europe.

Genaro’s experience with adrenochrome was less impressive than most drugs, and frankly on par with the “recreationally uninteresting” effects of schizophrenia, if even that. Adrenochrome clearly had some mental effect, but nothing interesting enough that most people who enjoy any form of recreational drug – including caffeine or nicotine – would be interested.

Per Genaro:

To sum up, effects were extremely weak, absolutely not fun nor psychedelic in anyway, and short lived (I would say the slight initial euphoria is gone within 4-5 minutes, and the few strange feelings that I experience from the stuff are gone within about 1 hour (I couldn’t say the exact duration as I didn’t really checked my watch) 
Needless to say I was very disappointed by this uninteresting compound. 

The effects I had from it were flimsy, there was a definite effect on my vision and my mental state for sure but I would definitely not call it ‘hallucinogenic’. 

Genaro, anonymous test user of adrenochrome

There are other users who have tried unpurified oxidized adrenaline in lieu of purified adrenochrome, but their experiences (stimulation, headache) sound very much like exactly what they administered – degraded adrenaline – and not pure adrenochrome.

This lack of hallucinogenic effect from any form of adrenochrome seems to be a consensus, despite the fact that the “hallucinogenic” nature of old, oxidized, “pink”, medical adrenaline WAS indeed one of the reasons that adrenochrome was investigated as a potential hallucinogen and/or neurotoxin in the first place.

My thinking here is that this is simply the classic ambiguity of the word “hallucinogenic” in pharmacology, ranging from minor visual disturbances to florid, dream-like, false experiences. Adrenochrome appears to cause the former – NOT the latter, which is generally desired by recreational drug users who are interested in hallucinogens.

In any case, what we are talking about with adrenochrome is clearly NOT a useful or attractive recreational drug.


So why is there any REAL interest in adrenochrome?

Why are there PATENTS?

Why are there, in fact, LOTS of patents?

The reason is subtle. Adrenochrome doesn’t really have any uses as a psychiatric drug, but it DOES have use as a hemostatic – to STOP BLEEDING.

Are you starting to see where some of the ideas for the MYTH of adrenochrome came from? From distortion of reality? Good.

The fact is, adrenochrome itself isn’t even a very good hemostat, because it decomposes so quickly. HOWEVER, in organic chemistry, there are KNOWN WAYS to stabilize substances like adrenochrome, and THAT is exactly what was done. The medically useful compounds are DERIVATIVES – specifically what are called CARBONYL DERIVATIVES – of adrenochrome.

What chemists do is take the double-bonded oxygens of adrenochrome – the quinone carbonyls – the things that make it reactive and unstable – and turn one of them into a double-bonded nitrogen with some additional stabilizer atoms attached. This is a NOTORIOUSLY EFFECTIVE TRICK for stabilizing certain molecules, and even for identifying those molecules through the stabilized derivatives. Organic chemists use this technique all the time.

The carbonyl derivatives of adrenochrome are called oximes, hydrazones, and semicarbazones. Almost ALL of these substances are useful as hemostats, and even better, they LACK the neurological effects of adrenochrome itself.

THIS is why adrenochrome is primarily manufactured – as an INTERMEDIATE for other more useful drugs.

That is it. That is the TRUTH about adrenochrome.


SO – now that we know the TRUTH about adrenochrome – how it is neither a pleasing recreational drug, nor something that must be obtained through wicked and murderous methods – we have to ask – why don’t the LIES go away?

Therein lies an even uglier truth. The adrenochrome myth is a typical satanic LIE that generates satanic REALITY by virtue of belief.

There are people who WANT others to believe the myth. And they want others to believe the myth, because it gives them POWER and MONEY. The nature of the power and the money VARY with the audience, but that is just fine with the people who benefit from it. They FOOL everybody, even if they fool them DIFFERENTLY.

Let me explain.


SATAN: Knock, knock.

Who’s there?

Satan.

Satan who?

Satan who can make you pollute your own mind by thinking about sex with children and child murder.

No way!

Your ENEMIES are having sex with stolen children and murdering them for ADRENOCHROME, and then getting HIGH on it!

OMG! My enemies are…..

SATAN: My work is done.


Starting to see how this works? This is a HUGE component of Pizzagate, sadly. Yes, there is real evil. Getting people to obsess about it to the point of unbelievability SPREADS THE EVIL FIRST and PROTECTS IT SECOND.

See how that works? And the adrenochrome isn’t even real. It’s ALL A LIE.

Are you seeing that extra bit of Satan – that hollowness at the end of the deal with the devil – the fact that the drug itself is actually a LIE, and DOESN’T EVEN REALLY WORK?

It gets worse.


SATAN: Knock, knock.

Who’s there?

Satan.

Satan who?

Satan who knows about the ultimate drug.

No way!

Good bye.

OMG! What if this ultimate drug is real?

SATAN: My work is done.


Just because something isn’t TRUE, doesn’t mean that there aren’t people who will not only believe the myth, but who will FEED it, and KEEP IT ALIVE.

And more than THOSE people, who keep the myth alive, there are other people who will pay top dollar to LIVE in the myth.

The debauched world of drugs, sex, money and fame is filled with people who want to believe in the NEXT HIGH of any kind. Those people are sitting on a world of cash.

Normally, I could not sell a pop singer teen celebrity a diverted unit of blood or blood plasma if my life depended on it. But thanks to the MYTH of adrenochrome, I can sell them either of these for absurd amounts of money, by telling them that there is something extra special about the stuff in the bag.

But let’s say that I’m not connected to a highly corrupted humanitarian organization where I can get blood products on the cheap. Doesn’t matter with something as mythical as adrenochrome. I can still sell people literally ANY drug or drug combination as “adrenochrome”, and most people who buy illicit drugs will believe it, at the right price.

People can even make money on the MYTH ITSELF.

Consider this 2017 movie, which is probably most famous for being SUED by Coachella for creating its own imitation festival called “filmchilla” as a marketing device.

The fact that there is a sickening, terrible, grade Z, stoner-cult, gore-cult, Satan-cult, cultural Marxist movie CALLED Adrenochrome should already be setting off alarm bells.

But remember – that’s just how they market the myth to THEMSELVES – the people who LOVE the sickness.

They market the myth to YOU differently.

Like THIS:

It’s ALL disinformation. But just because YOU would not BUY IT, doesn’t mean that OTHERS would not pay good money for it. And the more YOU believe the LIES, the more OTHERS will as well.

Are you seeing how the myth works? The MONEY is the key. But there is also POWER in it. Why? Because if you sell somebody a fake drug ALLEGEDLY from killed children, just IMAGINE what kind of blackmail power that has.

Adrenochrome is more of a satanic lie, than a satanic reality, but it’s still satanic.

Now – even though there MAY NOT REALLY BE some multi-billion dollar adrenochrome industry, I’m willing to bet that there ARE people making a pretty penny on the myth, just like any other illicit drug, and I’ll bet the money gets up into the low millions, or maybe the tens of millions worldwide.

Nothing huge, but NOT non-existent. The “low end” of the market definitely exists.

The main reason that I am CONFIDENT there is a market for an alleged adrenochrome product, is that it would be SIMILAR and PARALLEL to the market for LIFE EXTENSION. That market is among the RICH and POWERFUL, and it is VERY, VERY REAL.

I actually knew, at some point in my life, somebody who I would regard as a “lower-level cabal” member. This was a very anonymous person, but very high in the pantheon of leftist virtue – receiving a kind of weird respect – almost veneration – from very powerful people. This person was also a FANATIC about life extension, spending significant time and money looking for exotic biomedical and biochemical ways to live longer.

Read about Sergey Brin of Google. Same thing. There is an OBSESSION among these very self-important people, about making their important lives last just a wee bit longer.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/31/google-co-founders-and-silicon-valley-billionaires-try-to-live-forever.html

https://www.businessinsider.com/tech-billionaires-life-extension-projects-2015-4

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2015/04/04/tech-titans-latest-project-defy-death/

https://phys.org/news/2013-02-zuckerberg-brin-life.html

The list goes on – VERY long – just “google it”. “Life extension”.

Are these people a market for “young blood transfusions”, and perhaps for some of them, at several times the price, “adrenochrome blood transfusions”?

I have ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT about it.

If you don’t believe me, believe Scientific American, reporting in both skeptical and shocked tones, on the level of interest in “young blood transfusions”, in a case where the tip of the iceberg broke the waterline:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/young-blood-transfusions-are-on-the-menu-at-society-gala/

There are a number of interesting links in the article. Such as this one.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/infusions-of-young-blood-tested-in-patients-with-dementia/

This is a very real thing, and the Fake News Media – not unpredictably – “accidentally” promotes the market in hushed but knowing tones. Just look at the articles I cited. Those would have been PARODIES 50 years ago.

See what I keep saying about “fake science”? It goes with fake news and fake entertainment, both of which are really propaganda.

The actual market for [fake] adrenochrome is probably among the more libertine, occult-friendly, drug-taking, and risk-taking segments of the rich and powerful, as opposed to the more self-protecting “life extension” personalities.

Like I said, I’m speculating here, but I think I’m on solid ground. Adrenochrome is an “illicit” drug. People can read about it in a cool book by an establishment-approved author, glorified for years in “Doonesbury”, that was made into a Hollywood movie. There is AUTOMATIC DEMAND.

The more MYTHICAL, the more LEGENDARY, the better.

And wanting to be legendary is – well – quite common.


So there you have it.

This brings us full-circle, back to Hunter S. Thompson. Both the beginning and end of FAKE adrenochrome. The MAKER OF MYTHS was probably also the CONSUMER OF MYTHS – and if not him, then that still falls to the LEGIONS of “adrenochrome” buzz-buzzards that one finds on the internet, searching for information about adrenochrome, some of them hoping to try it. In researching this article, I found them everywhere.

https://youtu.be/1d-B8_pwDnE

My recommendation? Don’t be one of them. Stay the HELL away from the hell of illicit drugs, both REAL and MYTHICAL. But perhaps say a prayer for those who don’t take that advice. Because THOSE folks are very real, and they don’t always live long and prosper.

Having had my own life-long string of follies and recovered errors of other kinds….

Having suffered my own stormy experiences, thinking I was merely going to learn a little science – like perhaps the structure of adrenochrome….

Perhaps none of us really stay on shore….

Perhaps all of us are out there in boats – caught in various tempests….

Even when we don’t think that’s where we are.

Therefore – I propose a toast.

To life. May we all experience it abundantly. And truly. As designed.

W

The Story of Creation

PS – I note the psychologically toxic effects of simply doing this article. There is a lesson in that. There are MANY lessons. Time to do some more reading in the Bible.

Tracking Down Possible IC False Flag Recruitment on Gab

This is GOLDEN stuff.  I knew that we would find this someday.

But it’s SLICKER than it appears on the surface. You’re about to see how.

This happened within a short time after the Tree of Life Synagogue shooting.

Do the MATH. Whoops. I mean PSYCHOLOGY.

Before I even begin, let me say that I’m PINNING THIS ON an unknown intelligence agency.  You will see why.  I am NOT pinning this on the university that seems to have served as a conduit for the bad guys.  There may be players there, but I now realize that many – possibly ALL of the university people are CHUMPS in the scheme.

I know a little bit about that, actually.

Rob Monster started the investigation, but I really moved it along, and unearthed what appears to me to be a Russia-related intelligence link to recruitment of Gab proto-Nazis via a New York university psychology department (shades of Dr. Blasey-Ford).  Further research will likely bear this out.  Others with more talent than me are invited to pick up the trail.  I have not hit the mother lode, but I definitely struck pay dirt.

Start HERE, where Rob spotted what looked like FAKE NAZIS. 

Note that I have sworn repeatedly that I’ve encountered fake antisemites on Gab.  Real antisemites have certain tells that the fakes don’t have, and vice versa.  But the fakes work hard, and working together, gin up paltry bias into a small crowd, and thus a real foil for the leftists.

Remember what they did to Roy Moore. HOAXING is a leftist VIRTUE.

Well, the fake Nazis needed an identity, so I set out to find it.  I can’t be sure of who they really are, but I think I’ve got a very good idea now.  And it is NOT who I suspected at first – the CHUMPS.

https://gab.com/epik/posts/42595943

Repeating his words for clarity:

Call me crazy but I am a bit suspect of this brand new Gab account.
Of note, the phone number listed on their signup form apparently belongs to a SUNY faculty member specializing in Psychology:
https://www.geneseo.edu/~duffy/
Seems like yet another fake Liberal account to be used as a prop in some media hit job.  Hope an admin can check their IPs.

Rob Monster, on Gab, December 3, 2018

Here is an image of Rob’s post:

Here is a closer look at the sketchy Nazi page:

Several posters at Gab spotted minor tells that this wasn’t “real” Nazis or “alt-right”, backing up Rob’s evidence on the phone number.  Rob did not publish the name associated with the phone number, although you can see a last name in the URL of the place he found it.

I took up the phone number search myself, simply using the number (716)-245-5235 and various search engines.  As for the URL that Rob found:

Note that shortly AFTER Rob made his post, BOTH Gab accounts connected to the post (master and shill) were DELETED, and so was the university web page that Rob found, linked to the phone number.  It was very fast, which tells me it was very professional.

Here is a CACHED copy of the page from Google.

Further research by me showed that all information about Professor Duffy, an emeritus professor (VERY important – part of her ultimate exoneration), had been removed from the Department of Psychology website. 

This, despite the presence of information about OTHER emeritus professors STILL THERE.

This, despite the fact that Prof. Duffy seems to have been one of the Department’s MOST illustrious professors (see below).

These small but crucial facts are important when dealing with COVER-UP.  Leaving those LOGICAL but not EVIDENTIARY loose ends is typical.

But COVER-UP does not mean CRIME or GUILT in HALPER-WORLD.

Are you with me?  Cover-up is an INDUCED BEHAVIOR IN CHUMPS.

That is how WATERGATE worked. That is how MUH RUSSIA was supposed to work.

It’s PSYCHOLOGY. And it even works on PSYCHOLOGISTS.

This is the psychology of university cover-up – something I actually know something about.

It is likely that the department is embarrassed by this little kerfuffle, because other investigators and journalists began looking into it and calling (to say nothing of trolls, angry Gabbers, and who knows – maybe even real neo-Nazis).  Academics are VERY typical this way – they are petrified of scandal and conflict, and this behavior is indeed quite useful for goading them.  Such predictability is very useful to INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES. And, by extension, to the political entities controlling those agencies.

Communists in particular – who require nearly perfect cover – are quite aware of this embarrassment, and use it to advantage.  It is a way of making other people cover up FOR THEM – cutting off channels of investigation (ask Lisa Page and her co-conspirators about this – not that they will answer). 

So, we could be dealing with an INTELLIGENCE AGENCY or COMMUNISTS working THROUGH the Geneseo State University Psychology Department using instructors, adjuncts, students, visitors, and other sketchy players as bit-player operatives, and PHONE SHENANIGANS to redirect comms.  Also remember that intelligence agencies have access to phone data. Even calls to DEAD NUMBERS are theirs.

Are you with me? GOOD.

Dr. Blasey-Ford is an excellent example of an on-site player with IC connections and sketchy whereabouts, connected to a university psychology department.  Doesn’t mean the whole place is a nest of reds. But a university provides a great FRONT. Many open-area phones.

I’m presuming that both Professors Duffy and Kirsh (see below) were innocent victims here – they are likely USEFUL PAWNS in an intelligence patsy recruitment game.  They’re lefties, no doubt, but probably “fellow travelers”.  Not hoaxers or psycho-pushers.  Using sympathetic people as chumps is – if you think about it – very useful.  They tend not to inform, if they discover that they were used, and they will assist in a cover-up for multiple reasons. They “Stockholm in”, so to speak, if they become too aware.

How do you think I know this stuff?

That’s a Q question. Kinda like rhetorical, only with more awakening.

Now – it is VERY important that we distinguish between JOURNALISM and DOXXING.

I’m doing JOURNALISM. Maybe badly, but I’m trying.

I am presuming that there may be an explanation here, such as an intelligence agency which has followed Prof. Duffy and used her to attach their operatives.  You will see why shortly.

So WHO is this woman, Professor Duffy?  She is quite accomplished as an expert in COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, and has authored a number of books, a large number of publications, and some definitive academic textbooks.  She traveled in EXTREMELY liberal circles and worked with left-leaning groups and people her whole life.  PERFECT COVER for left-wing operatives to stay close to her. BUT that does not make her a plotter – VERY unlikely.  She is USEFUL.

Possibly useful for community organizing.

If Professor Duffy knew Richard Cloward, Frances Piven, or Bill Ayers during her active career, then I will take all this exoneration back. Otherwise, I  believe she is only distantly related to the PEOPLE who are actually behind incitement and recruitment on Gab, and she may not even know them, or know that they are IC operatives.  Why do I say this?  Follow along.

I believe that (716) 245-5235 – which was her old (1997-ish) FAX number, was kept at the exchange and suffix level in the department and reassigned to a NEWER FAX NUMBER with a newly created area code which includes the university.

If this is starting to sound like telecom spycraft, all I can say is BINGO.  Much of spycraft IS telecom.

All the department’s phone numbers that I saw are now in a NEW area code, (585), rather than (716).  Area code (585) was created by a SPLIT of area code (716) in the year 2001. Speaking from university experience here, when a new exchange or area code is introduced, there is usually an attempt by phone companies and the national system to conserve phone numbers and ring-through on dialing of an old number to the maximum extent possible, so that old numbers continue to work, and minimal headaches ensue.

Are you with me on that? This is why a theoretically dead number that WORKS is cover.

And there are even MORE tricks, but let’s not get into those quite yet. I hope you realize why IC is always neck deep in university telecom. They are watching EVERYTHING.

If we follow the same exchange and suffix (245-5235) to the new area code, then we find that the number goes to a younger colleague of Prof. Duffy’s in the same department, who is not only an expert on media-induced violence, but even more importantly, has authored several publications and books WITH Professor Duffy.

So what I’m saying is that the old phone connection and number survived as the new one with a different area code.

This is listed as a fax number, but many faxes include phones and answering machines, or ring through to them (which is an excellent way of hiding a somewhat unlisted phone number behind a fax).  A fax is plausibly deniable if investigated – very important.  Faxes are also readily hacked, and can do interesting things with phone calls.

Again – perfect for SPYCRAFT.  The phone calls were potentially being REROUTED.  And, of course, this is perfect for cutting off the connections in case of discovery.

Think collapsing tunnel.

Again – I am not so concerned about this professor, the colleague of Professor Duffy, because ANYBODY could be using the fax number phone for this fake Nazi group study, including TAs, post-docs, instructors, etc.  In fact, it is very likely to be somebody OTHER than the professor, so that if discovered, focus will divert to the wrong person. 

Professor Kirsh seems like a PLAUSIBLE person to be doing this, and thus he provides extremely good cover.  Again – very important.

In other words, Professor Kirsh is FAR more likely to be a red herrring, than a red.  His honest objection will cut off inquiry.  That is the way these folks work.  IN THE SHADOWS, using good people as fronts.

Click. The phone goes dead. End of story.

NOW – it is VERY helpful to read the biographies of both Professor Duffy and Professor Kirsh, from one of their coauthored books.  This explains WHY they became fronts. Read both biographies CAREFULLY and to the very end, particularly in the case of Professor Duffy.  (LARGER TEXT BELOW)

About the Author

Karen Duffy is a Distinguished Service Professor–emerita, at the State University of New York College at Geneseo. She received her Ph.D. in social and personality psychology from Michigan State University. Dr. Duffy served as a family mediator for the New York Unified Court System. She has also served on the executive committee and as the chief instructor for the training institute for the New York State Employee Assistance Program (EAP), as well as on the board of directors for a shelter for domestic violence and on an educational committee for a family planning agency. She has consulted to a variety of work settings on stress management, EAPs, and other work issues. She is a member of the American Psychological Society. Dr. Duffy has written several other books, including Community Mediation: A Handbook for Practitioners and Researchers and Community Psychology. She also edits several hard-copy and web-based annual editions for another publisher, on topics including psychology of personality, social psychology, introductory psychology, and adjustment. She has held two Fulbright Fellowships to St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia. While in Russia, she worked with AIDS International, several children’s shelters, and other community agencies. More recently, she completed a hu-manitarian aid trip to Mongolia.
 
Steven J. Kirsh is a Professor of Psychology at The State University of New York at Geneseo. Dr. Kirsh’s primary areas of research focus on the influence of violent media on emo-tion recognition and social information processing. He has published Children, Adolescents, and Media Violence: A Critical Look at the Research (2006) and Media and Youth: A Developmental Perspective (2010) as well as numerous scientific articles and book chapters.

Amazon Editorial Reviews

Professor Duffy’s background of extensive contact and project implementation with “community organizers”, and FAR more importantly her travels to Russia and Mongolia, lead me to believe that she at one time served as an unwitting conduit for whoever is behind this, allowing that group to get a foothold in her department.  I believe that this group is an intelligence agency.

There is NO WAY – absolutely NO WAY – that this woman has not been approached, attached to, manipulated, or used by at least ONE intelligence agency, and possibly more.  We should not presume, however, which one it is, based on “Russia”.

Professor Kirsh’s background makes his work of extreme interest to intelligence agencies in terms of handling what I call “useful psychos”.  Prof. Kirsh is very unlikely to have anything to do with anything bad – it is his RESEARCH that is useful, and his SUBJECTS even more so, when accessed surreptitiously (see Nikolas Cruz).  Prof. Kirch would be very usefully spied upon. I have no doubt that intelligence agencies watch every bit of data coming into and out of his offices.

Are you seeing where I’m going?

Having a DEEP spying operation in a university department of ANY USEFUL KIND (from nuclear to psych) is very advantageous to any intelligence agency.  At the same time, routing dirty operations through a place of “clean hands” – useful pawns (we can’t really call these people idiots!) is also advantageous.

I think we caught some clowns in action, and I suspect that a similar operation may have been in place for a certain man who attacked a synagogue.

In fact, I suspect that the PHONE RECORDS of the Tree of Life synagogue shooter may be extremely enlightening. Maybe even what looks like a WRONG NUMBER.

And yes – it really IS complicated. That’s why they get away with it.

People on our side need to think in terms of asymmetric warfare. Because the communists DO think that deeply.

Information warfare IS asymmetric warfare.

And that is why they keep using it to try to take down Trump and stop MAGA.

Just DO THE MATH PSYCHOLOGY.

W

“What can I say, folks?  Complicated business!”

PS: There is a reason the leftists are STILL after Gab.

Two-Strzok Smoke and Two Pages in the Hall of Mirrors


Is “Second Strzok” David Bowdich an “Untouchable” or a “New McCabe”?

And is Lisa Page an Intelligence Idiot or the Super-Spy Who Fooled Congress?


I was wondering why I was picking up heat of certain extremely interesting kinds.

Starting and maintaining this troublesome little website was bound to cause annoyance in DC, but I was surprised when that heat took on a characteristically federal nature that suggested the FBI was involved.

The actors (COUGH, COUGH) were not interested in information that might solve America’s problems. They seemed interested in information that might solve THEIR problems. WE being a part of those problems. ME being a particular one of those problems.

Interesting.

If people are starting to understand why I’m taking precautions to preserve this site in my absence, now you’re likely getting ideas why precautions are necessary.

Q said “You have more than you know.” He was NOT lying.


In a prior post, here, I talked about certain principles of information reversal that are particularly useful for what the other side is up to, blame-casting THEIR commie collusions on President Trump. It all gets very confusing, but I think that stating those ideas once again is useful.

First, the general principle:

The CLOSER the straw-man [accusation] can be arranged, FACTUALLY, to the REALITY being covered up, the EASIER the defense, because the STORY is closer to the REALITY, and pieces of the REALITY can be used as “proof” of the STORY – particularly if the STORY is advanced FIRST and the disentangled REALITY is posited LATER in defense.

This is then followed by three corollaries:

  1. Counterintelligence is the perfect place for this sort of intrigue, since counterintelligence amounts to infiltration of infiltration, staying infinitely close to the original infiltration. Basically, getting CLOSE to the REALITY with a DECEPTION is part of the game, so counterintelligence is a natural place to SEED this kind of defense.
  2. The ploy of reversed accusation becomes even easier and possibly even necessary if the enemy actually IS colluding with the accusing compromised or corrupted counterintelligence. This allows the enemy to “assist” the lies of the other side’s compromised counterintelligence, keeping them in place. This means that the counterintelligence people, if corrupted by the enemy, can then be “helped” by the enemy – in schemes exactly like what we are observing. Like I said, “19” [money dump plausibly matching amount offered to Carter Page] may have been a gift from Russia with love, or at least alliance.
  3. One of the first places that should be subverted by the enemy, both directly and indirectly, is counterintelligence.

THOSE were followed by some ideas that bring it all back to

COMEYWORLD:

The Hillary email cover-up by the SAME participants as in the FRAMING of Trump, is the BEGINNING of the revelation of the other half of the story – the COVER-UP. The TIGHTNESS of the same cast of characters in the Mueller cover-up fake investigation and the HRC email exoneration / cover-up is a kind of give-away of the theory I posited earlier.

Go back and review what I said, if it doesn’t make sense. It should. You can also see why the interception of the plot – by releasing text messages of Page and Strzok to force them out of the Mueller probe – was clearly the result of extremely skilled “IG-type work” in counter-intelligence. It’s not about the messages. It’s about the plot.

Wolf Moon, “The Framing of a President as the Cover-Up of Treason”

NOW – if you understand why POPPING STRZOK and McCABE out of the FBI was so important to bringing the continuing Hillary MADNESS roughly half-way to a close, you will understand the importance of what SUNDANCE – and unknown patriots who got some of Lisa Page’s information to him – just did.

He’s using “same-player” to MAKE A BUST.


First things first, I *URGE* you to read this post by Sundance.

Leaked Transcripts from Lisa Page Provide Some Stunning Revelations…

Sundance’s analysis is based on THIS reporting by Jeff Carlson in The Epoch Times:

EXCLUSIVE: Transcripts of Lisa Page’s Closed-Door Testimonies Provide New Revelations in Spygate Scandal

https://www.theepochtimes.com/transcripts-of-lisa-pages-closed-door-testimonies-provide-new-revelations_2763452.html

Sundance makes some extremely important points that show we now have a half-full glass of MAGA, where previously many saw it either empty or full. And it was the PERSISTENCE of our Granular Brother who found the key which unlocks the mystery. And maybe opens a new one.

“Really it’s the people that met with Jim Comey. Those are the only people that were really the same with respect to both teams. So it’s the same general counsel, the same deputy general counsel, me, Mr. McCabe, Dave Bowdich. The EAD for National Security Branch changed, but that was just because of regular personnel turnover.

Lisa Page, emphasis by Sundance

Many of us were trying to figure out how David Bowdich rose to the level of Deputy FBI Director under Chris Wray.  [Bowdich was previously the FBI field office head for the San Bernardino terrorist attack investigation in California]  Now we see that Bowdich was at the center of the small group in Washington DC who were doing the Trump investigation.
This reconciles why the current FBI is blocking the release of the witness transcripts.  Do you remember who told congress a few weeks ago that any transcript releases may interfere with the Mueller investigation?

Sundance, emphasis by Wolf Moon

Bowdich, I believe, is key. I had earlier thought that my “heat” might have Muellerish origins, but what if we have a “New McCabe” in place – WELLLLLL, that would explain a lot, wouldn’t it?

I am not automatically convinced that Bowdich is crooked, because I tend to think that Wray is a straight-shooter, and would pick straight-shooters. I differ with utmost respect with Sundance on this point. But straight-shooters often have certain weaknesses, and one of them is being somewhat manipulable – particularly in a corrupt institution. Bowdich has taken DOWN corrupt institutions. But has he ever stopped to think that he might have worked IN ONE for DECADES?

It’s a weird feeling. 😉

Bowdich isn’t just connected to the sketchy San Bernardino “event” – he’s also connected to a prior sketchy incident – the “LAX shooter” named Paul Ciancia (you know – as in “CIA ‘n’ CIA”) who rescued TSA from public weariness single-handedly.

(“OY VEY! At least he’s not JOSH EARNEST.”)

But I digress. 😉

https://www.thejournal.ie/lax-shooting-gunman-charged-tsa-agent-1158539-Nov2013/

Note how Bowdich “graduated” from this sketchy event to the next one in San Bernardino. ALL THE WAY TO TRUMP.

Now I’m not saying this guy is a bad guy. But I think there are several possibilities.

(1) Bowdich may have been closely observed by the McCabians to make sure he didn’t get any career-killing “conspiracy theory” ideas about sketchy events. He may have been brought forward precisely because he was “safe”. But that also means he has a blind spot that a CIA panel truck can drive right through, any time it wants. Of course such a person could be talked into reverso WRONG investigations like Trump or (COUGH) other people. This would explain a lot.

(2) Bowdich was “read in” on the sketchy gun grab events, and knew exactly why this stuff straight out of Bill Cooper was happening. He is then most likely exactly as Sundance is calling it – covering stuff up because of knowledge.

(3) Bowdich was NOT read in BEFORE, but is now aware of what the heck is going on, and he is covering up things for strategic reasons we don’t know, which could be good or bad. All bets are off, here. There is a possibility of UNTOUCHABLE, and things are getting interesting.

Bottom line – David Bowdich is a new variable that could be anywhere from “New McCabe” to “Untouchable”. And we know he’s covering up stuff for SOME reason.

Here’s WaPo’s take. Read it with care.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2018/01/29/the-rise-of-david-bowdich-the-former-sniper-in-line-to-become-the-fbis-new-deputy-director/?utm_term=.ebf1bb085863


I love the way I can “speculate well out ahead” of where Sundance’s more painstaking and granular approach goes, but when you need highly directed sunlight, his laser focus cannot be beat. So let’s start off with the FINALE to his post:

There’s a hell of a lot more to be learned from the Lisa Page testimony, specifically about the role of the CIA in the overall operation… 

However, for me personally, her outline of Bowdich in the main FBI DC office -as connected to the larger investigation- completes an annoyingly missing puzzle piece.

DAG Rod Rosenstein was hired by President Trump at the direction of, and request of, AG Jeff Sessions.   Rosenstein then recommended that President Trump hire FBI Director Chris Wray (a transparently useful idiot)….. Director Wray then hired David Bowdich as his deputy AND re-hired Dana Boente as FBI chief-legal-counsel.

The picture we get here is how the 2015/2016 officials within the corrupt DOJ and FBI enterprise, were put into higher office in the Trump administration 2017/2018; and those same officials are currently occupying positions that allow them to keep their prior corrupt activity hidden.

This whole thing is FUBAR.

Sundance, his emphasis

Let me re-emphasize something from that:

“However, for me personally, her outline of Bowdich in the main FBI DC office – as connected to the larger investigation – completes an annoyingly missing puzzle piece.” –Sundance, my emphasis

Good G_d in Heaven, I could have written those words myself. Although I am talking about a certain SMALLER investigation.

I *knew* it was Radium Rod coming at me, but I just didn’t know HOW he was doing it. I thought that the MUELLER SHOW was the only BAD ACT in FBI Town. And the Mueller Show had ZERO plausible rhyme or reason to go after me. Oh, yeah, they can put RUSSIANS into anybody’s world (COUGH, COUGH, note previous corollaries), but they can’t really mix them with Trump, so that part sucks for them.

There is no REVERSO to set up a STRAW MAN to go after me. There are ways to do REVERSO – as was done on Trump – but it’s more tied to CANKLES and OBAMA and OTHER THINGS.

So how does Q say it? “BOOM!”? I think that’s the proper expression.

As soon as I saw that we could potentially have a NEW McCABE in place, or somebody who could be bamboozled by OLD McCABES – as in McCabe’s finest “leavings”, everything started making SENSE. They don’t HAVE to go through Mueller – they can do reverso on other things.

And it’s not like they didn’t try that ALREADY.

If Q know what I mean. 😉

Certain people have a NEW COVER-UP needed, AND they need to shut me up about everything ELSE we talk about here.

WHATEVER. I simply want to thank Sundance for providing the key that solves the mystery. NOW I know where my friends and fellow patriots can point their fingers, should I not return in a most excellent condition to this blog, after my brief (yes, brief) absence.


Now – one more thing I notice about Lisa Page. Originally I had this gal pegged for some kind of CIA super-asset that was using Strzok like her personal, Hillary-electing, “spot massage” device. Little did I realize, it was the OTHER WAY AROUND on CIA connections. But I’m STILL on the fence about whether this woman is (1) a dope and a dupe, or (2) an extremely cunning super-spy who has Congress totally bamboozled.

Two CIA bots in the sack? Don’t get me started. In the sack is where everybody wants everybody. Well, not quite. But I digress.

This LEAK may mean it’s the latter – she’s TROUBLE and somebody KNOWS IT, and they needed to LEAK IT. If it’s true that BOWDICH hid her testimony because of what I’m going to say, then things get interesting.

I begin.

After reading that Lisa Page worked for Bruce Ohr for years, I started to think that maybe she really was just some poor cog in the machine, not qualified for counterintelligence, swept up as a desirable dupe in a non-functional, or better yet, reverse-purposed FBI.

But then OH MY GOD – you simply cannot get closer to Russia on this side of the Atlantic than Nellie Ohr, Russia researcher and specialist, with more downstate New York red commie ties than I can shake a stick at. The fact that she almost perfectly parallels ANOTHER “spent some time in Russia” lady academic who is deeply connected to both American communists and the Tree of Life synagogue shooting – well, that is even more worrisome to me. All these weird “puppets of Russia” or sketchy Russians working on the fringes of plots against Trump – it’s just so WEIRD.

[I keep working on the fascinating Tree of Life / Russia post, but it keeps getting delayed. SOON. Hopefully whoever was on my computer in a white hatty way while I was researching that is ahead of me.]

No matter whether Lisa Page is a dupe or a super-spy, I think that the plotters thought she was SAFE. She is either safe because she’s super-unqualified and a DUPE, or safe because she’s super-devious.

We really need to find out WHICH.

Here is the key that proves something is up. This is an extensive quote from Jeff Carlson’s article in The Epoch Times, citing Lisa Page:

Page Denies Bias, But Says FBI Focused More on Trump Than Clinton

Page steadfastly maintained there was no bias present in either the Clinton-email investigation or the Trump-Russia investigation on the part of anyone within the FBI or the DOJ and went to some lengths to illustrate that, in general, FBI personnel don’t like most of the people they tend to investigate.

At the same time, Page repeatedly and openly admitted to placing a greater emphasis and weight on the Trump-Russia investigation than the Clinton-email investigation:

“If you were weighing resources with respect to which poses a graver threat to national security, which is more, frankly, important, there is no doubt—at least in mine or anybody else’s mind that I know—that the Russia investigation posed an incredible threat to national security, and whether we got into the Weiner laptop simply did not.”

Page returned to this topic several times:

“The notion that there might be more emails that have not previously been seen that existed on Hillary Clinton’s email server just simply don’t even enter into the realm of the same room of seriousness. The Clinton investigation involved activities that had taken place 3 years prior. It’s an entirely historical investigation.”

“In the assessment of the Counterintelligence Division, they still don’t even come close to the threat posed if Russia had co-opted a member of a political campaign.”

Jeff Carlson, The Epoch Times, citing Lisa Page

To me, this is MIND-BLOWINGLY BACKWARDS. A long-term criminal threat going BEHIND THE DESK in the Oval Office is 1,000,000 times worse than some slightly Russified POLITICAL HACK going into a campaign – EVEN as an adviser.

She. Is. LYING.

The question is WHY.

What she is saying is garbage, and needs an explanation. And if that explanation has anything to do with David Bowdich, it had better be because Q is not bullshit and Wray is turning around the FBI underneath all these fuckers, and Page has to hide what is really going on. Otherwise just call out the tanks.

There is no comparison. If Hillary Clinton obstructed the FBI in a criminal fashion [HELLO, STONETEAR], likely done to hide international crimes up to and including espionage, this is INFINITELY more dangerous than Trump having some happy dupe named Carter Page working for him (assuming the most likely REAL threat by Carter Page was being a Russian dupe). In fact, even the scenario of “Carter Page = Carlos” compares at microscopic levels to the enormous problem of “Hillary Clinton = Ethel Rosenberg”.

Are we all seeing this?

And NONE of this takes into account the absolutely historically incorrect nature of the Lisa Page argument. She even USES the word “historical”. Holy FUCK – that’s ballsy.

Espionage is fought and won in the PAST – not the future. Hillary *herself* has MOUNTAINS of sketchy past that the FBI was IGNORING at every turn. And the’re worried about an adviser on the FRINGE of the Trump campaign in the FUTURE? Seriously?

This is CRAP. It is the most brazen form of bullshittery imaginable.

And this woman is making counterintelligence decisions?

Does everybody see what I’m saying? Page is either stupid or lying.

Could they REALLY have picked somebody THAT STUPID for this job?

I could be very wrong about that, but I’m starting to think this woman is lying her ass off here. I’m starting to think she is PLAYING DUMB ON HILLARY.

But let’s assume for a moment that Lisa Page IS dumb on actual espionage, subversion, and communism. To me, this absolute FAILURE to understand long-term communist subversion shows an incredible “pwnage” of the highest levels of the counterintelligence division of the FBI.

In fact, the following Lisa Page quote in the same article, makes me want to face-palm, if the SAME Lisa Page who believes the above, believes what I cite below.

Page, who acknowledged her personal relationship with Strzok at several points during the interview, noted that initially, Strzok was not “brought over as the senior executive to run the investigation. Another individual was, and that was not successful. It was not a good match with Mr. Mueller. He did not really have the sufficient counterintelligence background to be effective. That individual would later be identified as John Brown.

Lisa Page, my emphasis

Sorry, I am NOT buying that.

EXPLAIN it to us, Ms. Page, AS YOU WOULD TO A CHILD.

And NO, you cannot hide behind your “sources and methods” Halperoid Oxford / Cambridge Communist bullshit.

No. I’m starting to think that Mueller spotted Mr. Brown as a WHITE HAT. Page helped shuffle him out the door. Reds, dupes, “Strzok specials” and fellow travelers only.


Did these people at DOJ and FBI have any true understanding of Hillary Clinton?

Some did, I’m sure. The most ideological of players – people like Eric Holder surely did. THE RADICALS. Maybe “Comey the Commie”, although he strikes me as far more of a venal go-along, and less of a true believer.

I’m not sure about McCabe. I’m not even sure if most of those who were “read in” on the communist plots, such as the long range gun ban revealed by Bill Cooper, actually REALIZED they were carrying out communist plots. But they must have followed orders properly, and knew how to cover things up properly, because we know very well how highly THAT skill is valued by these Obama players.

And if Bowdich WAS involved in the stuff Bill Cooper revealed, then yes – he might have some utility in covering it up.

“Cover-up? Don’t cover me up, bro!”

In any case, the psychological control of the FBI was complete under Obama. Nobody at lower levels had a CLUE. Evidence that might have broken the glass-smooth mirror surface of FAKE NEWS illusion at FBI was quickly handed over to complicit individuals in charge of DUPES, fellow travelers and yes-people.

I CRY that this Sally Moyer chick was allowed anywhere NEAR anything Hillary.

And that now CONTINUES – and WILL CONTINUE – as long as people who are part of the tortoise-slow plot to BRAINWASH AGAINST GUNS are in charge.

If they were READ IN on the murders, then they need to be KICKED OUT.

Remember. There ARE no accidents. Not any more.

NEW McCABE?  Let us hope not.  AYE-YI-YI, let us hope not.  

Pray to G_D that this guy really IS an Untouchable.

And Lisa Page? She is NOT telling the truth. FIGURE IT OUT.

WHY are they covering this up?

W

Looks like a job for Ultraman.