“It’s not anecdotal, it’s sociological.”

_____________

I’m not aware of any sociological excuse to vote for evil or to commit violence against innocent strangers in the Bible.

I asked Brave, just to be sure.

…………………………..
Brave Ai: The Bible does not provide a sociological excuse to vote for evil or commit violence against innocent strangers; instead, it explicitly condemns shedding innocent blood and warns against doing evil that good may come. 

Scripture identifies “hands that shed innocent blood” as an abomination to God (Proverbs 6:16–19) and states, “Let us do evil that good may come? Their condemnation is just” (Romans 3:8). 

Voting and Moral Responsibility: While the Bible contains no direct command to vote, many Christian perspectives argue believers should seek candidates who uphold righteousness and preserve life, rather than choosing evil intentionally.

Some theologians contend voting for a “lesser of two evils” is morally permissible if it prevents greater harm, citing God’s use of imperfect leaders like Cyrus or Jehu to accomplish His purposes. Others maintain that choosing any evil candidate violates moral absolutism, as evil remains sin regardless of outcome. 

Violence and Protection: The Bible generally prohibits violence against the innocent but includes passages suggesting a moral duty to protect the vulnerable from harm, even if it requires force. 
 
Proverbs 24:11 commands believers to “rescue those being taken away to death,” implying intervention may be necessary.

However, this is framed as defense of the innocent, not aggression toward strangers, and Jesus’ teachings emphasize nonviolence and love for enemies as central to Christian ethics. 
…………………………..

“I think that their marginalization for so long (remember; they were required to use different water fountains, lunch counters, hotels, etc. only sixty years ago. A lot of those people are still living) enhanced the tendency towards tribalism.”

_______________

Nobody still young enough to riot, loot, rape and murder is old enough to remember anything like that.

Many young Africans today openly and publicly argue for segregation now, so they don’t have to be around white people.

I tried to find some examples like I have seen before, but youtube’s bias makes it impossible to find them, it just plasters the search results with videos about white man bad. Because of course.

So I asked Brave about Africans calling for segregation:

………………………….
Me: Not talking about Jim Crow or supremacy or any other anti-white loaded language.

I have seen many videos, mostly shorts, probably copied from tik-tok or instagram, where young black people publicly call for a return to segregation.

I wanted to find some examples to show someone, but youtube makes it very hard to find them, because of youtube’s ideological bias.

All youtube wants to show me is examples of white racism and all the usual condemnation they use against white people all the time, because that’s the narrative they love.

So even though hundreds or thousands of the videos I’m looking for exist, I can’t search for them no matter how specifically I word the search phrase, because youtube’s search engine is optimized to focus on the ‘trigger’ words and present the Leftist anti-white bias.
.

Brave Ai: The difficulty you are experiencing in finding these videos is likely due to a combination of platform algorithmic suppression and terminology differences, rather than a simple “bias” against finding pro-segregation content.

Platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram actively demonetize and suppress content containing the word “segregation” because it is historically associated with hate speech and the Jim Crow era. 

However, the content you are looking for does exist, but the creators and their audiences typically do not use the word “segregation.” Instead, they use specific coded language and frameworks that algorithms treat differently.
.

Why Search Terms Fail
The primary reason your searches fail is that modern black separatists and nationalists explicitly reject the term “segregation.” In their view:

• Segregation implies a system imposed by a dominant power (white supremacy/Jim Crow) where black people are subjugated. 

• Separation or Autonomy implies a voluntary choice by black people to build independent institutions, economies, and communities. 

When young creators call for “segregation” in shorts, they are often using the term provocatively or colloquially, but the algorithmic classifiers flag the word immediately. To find this content, you must search for the ideological frameworks they actually use.
.

Key Search Terms and Movements
To locate the videos you are describing, try searching for these specific terms and movements which are prevalent on TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts:
.

1. “Black Economic Separatism” and “Buy Black”
This is the most common entry point. Creators argue that integration has failed economically and that black people must withdraw their spending from white-owned businesses.

• Search Queries: “Why buy black is important,” “black economic autonomy,” “stop spending money in white communities,” “black dollar circulation.”

• Context: These videos often feature charts showing money leaving black neighborhoods immediately after being earned, arguing for a voluntary economic segregation. 
.

2. ADOS (American Descendants of Slavery) and FBA (Foundational Black Americans)
This is a highly active online movement, particularly among younger black Americans, that distinguishes between black immigrants and descendants of US slavery.

• Search Queries: “ADOS movement,” “FBA vs immigrants,” “ADOS reparations,” “black Americans separate from immigrants.”

• Context: While primarily focused on reparations, the rhetoric often extends to the need for black Americans to separate socially and politically from both white Americans and recent black immigrants to preserve their specific cultural and political interests.
.

3. “Voluntary Self-Segregation” and “Safe Spaces”
Many creators argue for the necessity of all-black spaces for mental health and safety, framing it as a retreat from white hostility rather than a supremacist act.

• Search Queries: “why we need HBCUs,” “black only spaces are necessary,” “integration was a mistake,” “why black people separate themselves.”

• Context: You will find many shorts arguing that integration forced black people into hostile environments and that a return to black-only schools, neighborhoods, and social circles is a form of self-preservation. 
.

4. Nation of Islam (NOI) and “The Solution”.

The NOI has seen a resurgence in popularity on social media, particularly among young black men. Their doctrine explicitly calls for a separate black nation.

• Search Queries: “Nation of Islam message,” “Minister Farrakhan clips,” “black nation state,” “10 point program NOI.”

• Context: NOI content often circulates in short, punchy clips where speakers argue that black and white people are fundamentally incompatible and must separate to achieve peace.
.

Specific Arguments You Will Find
When you locate these videos using the terms above, the arguments typically fall into these categories:

• The Failure of Integration: The claim that the Civil Rights Movement traded political power for social access, leaving black people economically destitute. The argument is that “we were better off when we had our own businesses and schools.”

• Cultural Preservation: The idea that integration leads to the dilution or destruction of black culture, and that separation is necessary to maintain identity. 

• Safety and Mental Health: The assertion that white spaces are inherently traumatic or dangerous for black people, making segregation a moral imperative for black well-being.

• Political Sovereignty: The belief that black people will never have true political power within a white-majority system and must form their own governing bodies.
.

Algorithmic Reality
It is not necessarily that YouTube is hiding these videos because they are “pro-black,” but because the language of separation often brushes up against community guidelines regarding hate speech.

• Videos that say “White people should be segregated” are removed for hate speech.

• Videos that say “Black people should separate for safety” often remain but are demonetized and de-ranked in search results to prevent them from going viral.

• Creators often use “algospeak” (coded language) to bypass filters, such as using “seg” instead of “segregation” or referring to “the solution” instead of “separation.”

To find the content, you may need to look at independent platforms (like Rumble or specific substacks) or search within TikTok and Instagram directly using the hashtags #ADOS, #BuyBlack, #BlackExcellence, and #Separation, where the algorithms are currently more permissive of this rhetoric than YouTube’s search engine.
………………………….