I leave this as an open question, although this thread is ultimately concerned with somebody named Barbara Olson, who died on 9/11.

I believe that the method of Barbara’s murder is now demonstrated.

Introduction

The key to solving 9/11 is realizing that it was a CLINTON-centered operation which was launched AFTER the Clintons left the White House, in order to deflect attention from their central role.

9/11 served as a way – a contingency plan – to CONTROL the behavior of the United States, and in particular the Republicans, should Al Gore not win the presidency in 2000. It was a control-of-opposition operation, much like Charlottesville, only much, much larger.

I began questioning the official 9/11 story when Stephen McIntyre reminded me that Robert Mueller’s prosecutions have a PATTERN.

1/ THREAD. Mueller's indictment of 13 people far away from US jurisdiction and who won't appear for trial reminds me of a similar and very publicized but under-discussed incident just as he assumed FBI directorship.

— Stephen McIntyre (@ClimateAudit) February 17, 2018

The pattern which McIntyre was primarily demonstrating was the pattern of Robert Mueller indicting a good number of people (13 both times) who were overseas and out of reach of actual prosecution.

(As an aside, this pattern was useful to me later in pursuing the fact that Mueller indicted Russian agents living near Nicholas Cruz. This is critical in understanding what is going on for OTHER reasons.)

A secondary pattern shown by McIntyre was that Mueller seemed to have pursued a WRONG PROSECUTION in the Khobar Towers case, and by implication of incompetence or politics, he might be wrongly pursuing Trump.

Other commenters showed that this pattern of wrong prosecutions by Robert Mueller extended to others, including multiple innocent defendants while informant Whitey Bulger was protected, as well as wrongly accused anthrax researcher Steven Hatfill.

A third pattern was close and purposeful interaction of Robert Mueller with James Comey in the very sketchy Khobar Towers bombing prosecutions, very reminiscent of the sketchy Mueller special counsel.

Thus, I was led to believe that Bill Clinton’s “aw, shucks, missed again” pursuit of Osama/Usama bin Laden (UBL) – typified by the notorious “aspirin factory bombing” – was in fact a fraud, and that the real goal of the Clintons was to set up a major terror event for multiple reasons, including self-enrichment and self-empowerment.

Later, when Q made me aware of Beverly Eckert’s death, and after looking into the death of JFK Jr., I became further convinced that these things were all connected to the Clintons.

A critical connection for me was the idea that videographic hoaxing had been used for the plane strikes on the Twin Towers, with a small group of NYC-based videographers in on the scam. This MATCHED my own knowledge of an off-the-books scandal that I refer to as CA3, in which a reporter/videographer pair from the NYC market attempted to create false videographic evidence as part of LAWFARE being used for Democrat politics (CA3 = Conspiracy to Advance Affirmative Action).

The key slip-up in the 9/11 videographic fraud is Peter Jennings reacting on-air to the primary error, referred to as “Pinocchio’s nose”. This rules out the idea that the erroneous footage is later disinformation. Note also that I have tracked down certain recent anti-NASA “flat earth” disinformation, and connected it to much earlier 9/11 disinformation which was out of the NYC area. The fact that NYC now has a communist mayor is not a coincidence.

The totality of information on the plane-building videography and blatant unphysicality of the filmed strike shows me that there were errors made in terms of the durability of the deception versus crowd perception and reasoning, with the crowd advancing faster than anticipated.

I currently leave open a number of aspects of 9/11, but my theorizing now centers on two ideas: (1) large-scale Potemkin blood hoaxing, and (2) Clinton centrality.

What follows is based on this.

The Question of Barbara Olson

Barbara Olson was a lawyer and persistent investigator of Hillary Clinton during the Clinton administration. She was responsible for several of the most damaging Clinton scandals being revealed.

Olson wrote a book in 1999, as the Clinton administration began to close down, and Hillary Clinton prepared to run for a Senate seat in New York.

Tonawanda asked this question (image followed by text quote):

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2018/12/23/dear-maga-open-topic-20181223/comment-page-1/#comment-29146

Tonawanda
December 23, 2018 at 6:19 am E
The death of Barbara Olson is so suspicious to me. At the time I wondered if she was a Ron Brown type “throw in” for 911, a favor done for Hillary. It sounds like a theory from behind the Tin Foil Curtain, but I think how well coordinated the whole plot was. What would it take to get Olson on that specific flight, trapped in existential terror before her death?
Hillary is in love with unimpeded power, which means she is in love with unimpeded evil. Part of unimpeded power is lust for total revenge.
I have a friend who openly disrespected Hillary in a public forum. My friend was subsequently subjected to protracted, devastating legal proceedings where injustice reigned at every turn. The instigator of the proceedings had a direct connection to Hillary. No one can prove it, but it is hard not to suspect this was Hillary’s revenge.
In part, the persecution Our President is enduring IMO is very personal revenge direct from Hillary.

Tonawanda, December 23, 2018, The Q Tree

I KNEW I had seen that Barbara Olson had an event she had to get to, and that this controlled her schedule. Later, I learned that she had TWO events bracketing 9/11, and this even more tightly controlled her schedule, but based on knowledge of only ONE event, I said this.

wolfmoon1776
December 23, 2018 at 12:33 pm E
“What would it take to get Olson on that specific flight, trapped in existential terror before her death?”
I figured it out. Holy fucking shit. She was MURDERED.
Thread going up.

Wolf Moon, December 23, 2018, The Q Tree

The Event People

The reason I am able to state this categorically, is that I actually have experience with the unit who I refer to as “The Event People”. They are probably CIA or a hidden agency. They work by abusing NSA data – this is key to how they are able to PREDICT what people will do, when they will do it, and then manipulate them in these instances. They are basically trap-layers. They are not the “IMF” – they are REAL and FALLIBLE – which is why I’m telling you about them.

The way to CATCH them is to have some idea when, where, and HOW they will strike – to walk THROUGH their traps – and not take the cheese.

Knowing about one’s own NSA data is key to busting them. Knowing WHEN they have irresistible bait in front of them is very, very helpful.

I have interacted with these people multiple times over my life. Based on those experiences, I can tell what levels of data they need, and what kinds of circumstances “draw them out”. An essential component is when people are CONSTRAINED by something important. If a person is GOING TO BE SOMEWHERE, or GOING TO SEE SOMEBODY – these are critical bottlenecks that are used to attain predictability. Then the key is setting up a scenario in the path of the person.

Knowing that one is IN such a scenario is how to get out.

As soon as I saw that Barbara Olson was flying to LA on 9/11 for taping of an appearance with Bill Maher on “Politically Incorrect”, I realized that this was how she was taken out – by being manipulated onto the flight.

This obeys what I call the “Economy of Events Principle” – the idea that multiple “coincidences” protect each other from discovery as being planned events. It is a particularly efficient way to close out loose ends close to the plot. You know the saying that “truth is stranger than fiction”. This REALLY WORKS as psychological cover. People will psychologically dismiss something as “too weird” when coincidences stack up. They tell themselves that nobody would or could plan this.

WRONG.

I want you to think about this very carefully. Let me ask some questions to demonstrate how easy it is to lead somebody into a trap. Remember – ENTRAPMENT is a thing which law enforcement and intelligence do ROUTINELY. LE tries to do “just less than entrapment” – IC has no such bounds. The Event People are limited only by “what they can get away with without detection”. They seem to be very skilled at not overplaying their hand, and can always fall back to something like “we’re just the FBI” if they get caught.

Sound like Page and Strzok? You betcha. It’s THAT WORLD. Which by now you know REALLY EXISTS.

Here we go.

• How many calls to how many people do I need to get somebody on a plane?
• How many calls to how many people do I need to get my favorite critic interviewed by a famous friend, at a particular time, without necessarily involving that friend?
• How many people’s phones do I need to listen to, to make sure things happen?
• If I never use the NSA data to go to court, will anybody ever know I abused it?
• Are there or were there ever any back doors to NSA data in place?
• Was there ever any abuse of NSA data by Democrats?
• When people find out that they have “inadvertently” become involved in something shady and utterly unbelievable, what do they do?
• Would they tell themselves it was coincidence?
• Would they fear the power of the people who might have arranged things?
• Would they fear that they would not be believed, or called “crazy”?

Now – I want to give you the story that freaked me out. Read it, knowing what I just told you.

The bolded parts are critical.

Witnessed Event: American Airlines Flight 77

Barbara Olson was a lawyer, author and conservative American television commentator. In 1994, she joined the United States House of Representatives, becoming chief investigative counsel for the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee. In that position, Olson led a number of different investigations into the Clinton administration. She exposed the White House travel office scandal and the FBI files controversy. Olson published a collection of books that examine the history of Hillary Clinton and the actions of Bill Clinton in the final days of his presidency. Some of her accusations include unlawful pardons by Bill Clinton, the looting of the White House and executive orders that were sheer abuses of presidential power. On January 20, 2001, Bill Clinton pardoned 140 people in the final hours of his presidency.

In 1996, Barbara Olson married a man named Ted Olson. Ted successfully represented presidential candidate George W. Bush in the Supreme Court case of Bush v. Gore, which effectively determined the final result of the contested 2000 Presidential election. He subsequently served as United States Solicitor General in the Bush administration. On September 11, 2001, Barbara Olson boarded American Airlines Flight 77 traveling from Virginia to Los Angeles. She was visiting Los Angeles for a taping of Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher.

On September 11, 2001, Flight 77 was hijacked at 8:54. Between 9:16 and 9:26, Olson called her husband. According to him, she reported that the flight had been hijacked, and that the hijackers had knives and box-cutters. A minute into the conversation, the call was cut off. Shortly after, Barbara reached her husband again. Ted Olson asked for her location and she replied that the plane was flying over houses. Ted informed Barbara of the two previous hijackings and crashes. She didn’t display signs of panic over the phone. American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the western side of the Pentagon at 09:37 EDT. All 64 people on board were killed, including Barbara Olson. Following her death, Politically Incorrect host, Bill Maher, left a panel seat vacant for a week.

The two phone calls Barbara Olson made from Flight 77 are an important factor to the accepted story of 9/11. They provide evidence that American 77 had been aloft after it had disappeared from FAA radar around 9:00 AM. The calls are also the only source of the widely accepted idea that the hijackers had box cutters. The story has been scrutinized by a collection of researchers, who have accused Ted Olson of changing his account. He originally indicated that Barbara used a cell phone to call him, but later said she called using an airline phone. The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude flights wasn’t developed until 2004.

From a source archived here: https://archive.fo/k2XVn

Now – add to THIS constraint (Bill Maher taping) another one, which pinned her down almost with certainty to one specific flight. Link:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/reliable-source/post/ted-olson-on-loss-and-love-in-the-decade-since-911/2011/09/09/gIQAlqKDLK_blog.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.50d31845ae94

Ten years ago, Olson became the most famous person in D.C. to lose a loved one in the terrorist attacks: His wife, conservative commentator Barbara Olson, was on American Airlines Flight 77 when it crashed into the Pentagon. She had delayed a trip to California so she could be in town for his birthday dinner the night before.

Washington Post, September 9, 2011

I make no claims beyond the fact that this woman Barbara Olson was murdered. I do not know when, where, or in what manner. As I no longer accept the “official” explanation of 9/11, that leaves open a lot of possibilities. I suspect there was much evil hoaxing, fooling people at every step of the way, before they were killed. Remains? No problem.

“History books.”

The takeover of America surreptitiously by two foreign superpowers through traitors is not a simple thing.

It is clear that NOBODY was higher on Hillary’s list of enemies than Barbara Olson. Absolutely nobody. And remember Judge Kavanaugh, and his role as a critic of the Clintons, and the HELL that Hillary put him through. Barbara Olson was many times more of a problem for Hillary.

HOWEVER, that is not the most important reason to kill her. Barbara Olson was an extreme risk to the 9/11 plan. She would have INSTANTLY figured out that it was the Clintons behind the operation, and begun to unravel it. She simply had too much knowledge of the Clintons. In the “identification of risks” stage, Barbara Olson would have been identified, without question.

Barbara Olson herself was dangerous to the 9/11 plot. She had to be killed. THAT is the real motive.

The plotters needed to fold the loose end into the plan itself and then CLOSE IT OUT.

Are you with me? Maybe not. But I don’t care.

“It is better to be right, than to be believed.”

-Wolf Moon

W