Dr. Charles Hoffe’s Observation of Spike Protein mRNA Vaccine-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension

A Beautiful Demonstration of Real Science in Action, and How Political Correctness Prevents Obvious Correlations and Causations From Being Seen by Monetarily Dependent Scientists


Being “Sherlock Holmes” is easy, when everybody else in mainstream science has turned into a character from “The Muppets” or “Sesame Street”.

Except for Dr. Charles Hoffe, plus a bunch of other physicians and scientists who our media calls “The Dirty Dozen”, that “Count” guy is my only real competition now.

Of course, when he counts 57 genders, he will leave our little group of truth-tellers, but until then he can probably count protons and neutrons reliably.

Thankfully, I’m retired. I can speak the truth. “The Count” is still employed by the dirty establishment.


Consider a basic idea of vaccination known from literally centuries of science – from even BEFORE the first vaccination in the 1790s, when people used WEAKENED smallpox to gain immunity to NORMAL smallpox (a process called “inoculation” or “variolation”).

Here is that bedrock idea. A principle so simple, it borders on “an obvious trend in a collection of observations”.


“Immunity conferred by catching a disease naturally and recovering is strong, and any form of preventing the disease by inoculation (including variolation and vaccination) attempts to live up to that level of immunity. Some vaccines will give life-long immunity, if that is possible, or for as long as the disease itself gives immunity, if lucky, but in many if not most cases, the durability of immunity conferred by a vaccine is LESS than the durability of immunity conferred by the disease itself.”


So I repeat – this simple idea is something that “everybody knew” from roughly 1790 to 2019, and even before 1790, when vaccination wasn’t even called vaccination.

But then – suddenly – in 2020, the media talked us out of centuries of knowledge about how immunity works, by a kind of hand-waving authority – allegedly from “the experts” at CDC and NIH.

Fauci and Scarf Lady went along with the media hoax. They didn’t have to say a lot. It was mostly by leaving OPEN the question of natural immunity, when it should NOT have been left open, that damage to science and society was done.

Of course, after enough results poured in from laboratories around the world, noting how much stronger natural immunity to COVID-19 appeared to be, we were relieved to discover that – Yes, Virginia – immunity is still behaving just like it did before COVID-19.

(The feds will certainly have to do some “funding mechanics” to fix all those people reporting “incorrect science”, won’t they?)

And THAT is when Rand Paul began taking Anthony Fauci to the woodshed over natural immunity.

So why the heck did we ever suspect or believe otherwise?

No good reason, except the Fake News.

Think about it.

If this does not prove to you that the media controls science, and not the other way around, then wait for the next example.


I’m going to replay parts of a conversation some of us has on October 1 of this year.

It’s in images, but I will also provide a link and the text.

Focus on Tonawanda’s friend.


LINK: HERE

Now, I will include the text as well. This is the ENTIRE conversation after the initial post, including additional participants.


Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine October 1, 2021 11:19

I now know two people personally who get the injection. One was my BIL who got covid anyway, but we made sure he got treated the right way and he got better immediately, and is back at full health despite diabetes.

The other is a friend who cannot breath well even with an oxygen tank turned to max. He has seen every type of doctor, and no one can figure out what the problem is.

He and I had a sharp but friendly argument over the injections a month or so ago. He is MAGA but a true “vax” believer (hard to imagine, but they exist).

I have spoken to him a couple times at length, but refrained from bringing up the injection as a possible cause of his present distress. His wife thinks he is not going to make it, but, again, I have not mentioned to her the injection as a consideration.

The doctors will not tell him, and at this point what difference could it make, other than making him feel more stress or more unhappiness?

Deplorable Patriot

Deplorable Patriot Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 1, 2021 11:34

I feel like this all the time. No one in my circles will listen. It’s pointless, and would end up splintering relationships that will be needed as these people all go down sick.

I actually feel this way about ALL vaccines to an extent, and I still think that my younger nephew is actually vaccine injured. No one will listen to me on that, either, given there is another diagnosis that fits. They didn’t listen to me about the one drug he was on, and I turned out to be right. I was the first one to call that the drug was the problem, and eventually it could not be ignored.

This is no different. All the research won’t change minds when all the people in family want to be able to do is travel, and that was the driver for the decision.

ROBERT BAKER

ROBERT BAKER  Reply to  Deplorable Patriot October 1, 2021 12:36

You are a real life Cassandra. The fact that you endure this psychological burden because you know at some point in the future those people will need you is admirable. You are demonstrating the true character of a disciple of the Lord. Your faith is obviously sustaining you.

Deplorable Patriot

Deplorable Patriot Coyote Reply to  ROBERT BAKER October 1, 2021 12:41

I have no choice.

rayzorback

rayzorback Wolverine Reply to  Deplorable Patriot October 1, 2021 23:37

Nor do any of us……
Like I’ve been saying (not recently here) for years…
GOD… is in COMPLETE control of EVERYTHING.

gil00

gil00 Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 1, 2021 11:34

He’s in total denial. Like an addict you can force a revelation. When his wife asks for help you can talk to her. Otherwise id just let them go.

gil00

gil00 Coyote Reply to  gil00 October 1, 2021 11:57

I meant can’t force…

Emeraldstar

Emeraldstar  Reply to  Tonawanda October 1, 2021 11:40

>>”I have spoken to him a couple times at length”<<

Would it be more productive to focus on the potential REMEDIES, first, than on the likely CAUSES?

For months now, posters here have been *extraordinarily* helpful in suggesting many means to offset the adverse effects.

Right to try?

Survivor-mectin, perhaps?

As has been established, it ISN’T a lack of oxygen in the lungs, it’s instead the lack of TRANSFER of the oxygen in the lungs to the bloodstream.

Get better first, and only THEN figure out the likely cause.

Am I missing something here?

I hope this helps …

Emeraldstar

Emeraldstar  Reply to  Tonawanda October 1, 2021 11:41

>>”I have spoken to him a couple times at length”<<

Would it be more productive to focus on the potential REMEDIES, first, than on the likely CAUSES?

For months now, posters here have been *extraordinarily* helpful in suggesting many means to offset the adverse effects.

Right to try?

Survivor-mectin, perhaps?

As has been established, it ISN’T a lack of oxygen in the lungs, it’s instead the lack of TRANSFER of the oxygen in the lungs to the bloodstream.

Get better first, and only THEN figure out the likely cause.

Am I missing something here?

I hope this helps …

[mistyped my login …]

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 1, 2021 22:34

I suspect your friend is going through what I went through.

How long after he got the jab until he had symptoms?
Which jab did he get?
What normal jab symptoms did he have?

Tell them you know a scientist who had COVID and suffered breathing problems, but got better, and thinks he can help.

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 2, 2021 07:41

He got the shots in March. I will ask him what type. The breathing problem was gradual and started about a month ago and has become severe.

We spoke again yesterday, and I suggested D3 and Zinc. Oddly enough, his own doctor told him to take those, and he has not taken them. Now he says he will.

He is going in for angiograms on Tuesday and used that as a polite excuse to defer on any further discussion.

But I would love to hear your perspective when I get you the info.

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 3, 2021 14:01

Great! Both D3 and zinc are necessary to fight off respiratory viruses, and they tend to be deficient as we get older. If he does have spike protein lung damage, every minor respiratory virus brings back the COVID lung problems.

Also magnesium helps me. It is a vasodilator and antihypertensive, and I suspect that it is a PULMONARY vasodilator, too.

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 3, 2021 14:38

TY. I will talk to him again. He is overwhelmed, I can tell, and scared.

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 3, 2021 14:56

I know that fear. Inability to breathe properly is extremely scary. And it scared a lot of people onto vents where they died.

One of the foulest tricks of both COVID and MASKS is that they mess up O2 / CO2 balance. One has to ADAPT to the new balance. THAT is hard. One reason I refuse to wear a mask is that it really messes with my oxygen balance. It messes me up for HOURS. And I’m IMMUNE, damn it! Pointless and CRUEL to make me wear a mask – these Stalinist bastards!

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 10, 2021 22:35

I am still trying to find out what “vax” he took. He is not doing well. He had two angiograms and the doctors are still uncertain what his problem is, and he has been fretful (so I am told).

It is a delicate situation.

But please keep this post in mind so when I find out we can discuss.

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 10, 2021 22:44

Good! I’m still paying attention!

One way you might get him the proper help is to suggest that he may have HAD COVID AND DIDN’T KNOW IT. Both he and the Covidian doctors will believe that, before they will believe that the jab WAS the “Covid” that he got.

That will get the docs thinking that he has long-haul, and they may send him on to a “long-haul” specialist.

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 10, 2021 22:48

TY for staying with this. I am trying to talk with him the best way, but he is distracted, and it is hard to do.

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 10, 2021 22:49

Yes! The best thing may just be sympathy and to keep him holding on.

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 10, 2021 22:53

So far, that is the only sensible way. Truth is the best generally, but at the right time, otherwise it can be a bad choice if the truth creates more negativity.

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 10, 2021 22:59

Gail’s story of her long-term oxygen problem being cleared up by moxidectin (relative of ivermectin) may be useful, because it can be mentioned simply as fact – and it’s kind of funny because it was an accidental exposure (while dipping sheep in a skin-penetrating formulation).

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 10, 2021 23:12

I remember her story, although initially I was confused by what she said. After a sharp remark I got it.

I took eyebermactain to him and he refused despite my soft approach. But maybe he will listen now, when I get a chance to talk to him.

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 12, 2021 16:27

I spoke to my friend. He took Moderna. When I asked he pre-emptively said “what I have has nothing to do with the voccine.”

He said the docs told him he had severe pulmonary hypertension, and there was nothing they could do except give him the generic form of Viagra.

The MDs might very well be telling him exactly the way it is, and who am I to say differently? Still, his case at least proves to me how deep my distrust is.

TY for engaging on this personal interest! As always, I highly respect your knowledge and judgment.


Wolf again…..

Now – if you follow through that conversation, you will see that Tona’s friend started off with vaccination, followed later by persistent shortness of breath. You can see that I suspected he might need magnesium as a pulmonary vasodilator – that his case might be similar to mine, which was from COVID itself, only his seems to be much WORSE.

Later, you see that he’s getting an angiogram – meaning, they’re going to look at his blood vessels. This is heading exactly where I thought it was going.

Finally, you see that it is verified that Tona’s friend took the Moderna vaccine, and has pulmonary hypertension.

This confirmed everything that I suspected.

Now – WHY did I suspect that this man had pulmonary hypertension?

FIRST, because I have LONG been following the story of endothelial damage in the capillaries of the lungs by SARS-CoV-2 – more specifically by the spike protein – and resultant pulmonary symptomology (including shortness of breath), from all the way back in March and April of 2020, when Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell realized that the ARDS vent strategy “imported from China” was ALL WRONG. He started looking at high-altitude sickness as a better (though still flawed) model of the disease, and quickly understood the endothelial and pulmonary capillary thrombotic nature of SARS-COV-2 infections.

See, for example:


LINK: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32665939/


As you can see, by the middle of 2020, the DISEASE was already well understood in terms of being a provoker of coagulopathy and the sequelae of that.

It was this coagulopathy, that was causing shortness of breath.

And THAT leads to the SECOND reason I suspected pulmonary hypertension. Something I had seen HERE, actually, in various postings on our site. Thank you to all posters here, who brought this information.

But THIS information was not about the disease. This was about the VACCINE.

Please listen to the video below – it will not only explain what is happening – it will assure you of this good doctor’s credibility.


Canadian doctor warns the worst is ‘yet to come’ from blood clotting damage linked to COVID-19 shots

LINK 1: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-26-canadian-doctor-warns-worst-yet-to-come.html

LINK 2: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadian-doctor-warns-the-worst-is-yet-to-come-from-blood-clotting-damage-linked-to-covid-19-shots/

LINK 3: https(colon)//www.bitchute(dot)com/video/A6GbcUl6blpJ/

There is also a LARGER video which includes the above video – but it ALSO includes additional information – priceless information – about how Chinese crypto-kinetic warfare is used as part of “reality shaping” to support Chinese sociobiological warfare. See if you can arrive independently at the same understanding, and explain it to me in the comments. You will need to listen to the longer video to see it.

LINK 4: https(colon)//www.bitchute(dot)com/video/zAw0Pzg27RTo/


Everything Dr. Hoffe says is – sadly – bad news for “yours truly”, but it MASSIVELY confirms my “hunch” that COVID took at least a DECADE off my life.

This is just a gut-level assessment of the damage to my health, but everything that I’ve seen in my medical test data seems to confirm it. My respiratory, pulmonary, cardiac, vascular, and immune functions are all noticeably impaired after COVID. I do not know if I have pulmonary hypertension, but I suspect that if I do NOT have it, it is only because I have very successfully prevented systemic hypertension. My blood pressure is low, and I have kept it low, thanks to magnesium.

This is part of the reason I have been so adamantly opposed to vaccinating our troops, and regard that action as TREASONOUS. The only people who are helped by medical turnover of our military are the communists – both foreign and domestic.

But let’s not talk about me. Let’s not talk about the US Military.

Let’s talk about Tonawanda’s friend.

The fact that he had the Moderna vaccine is – in my opinion – very important.

Why?

This gets into the observed and known differences between the vaccines, which I have watched VERY CAREFULLY from the very beginning. I very CLOSELY watched the Phase One trials for both Pfizer and Moderna.

The Moderna vaccine was NOTORIOUS for causing symptoms VERY similar to the disease, including fever, exhaustion, headaches, muscular and kidney aches. Worse than that, the Moderna systemic effects were extremely common in the trial group.

If I had to describe my “non-taker” impression of the Moderna shot like a “gourmet” might, it would be like the Shingrix shingles vaccine first shot, only more systemic like the second shot.

A shingles vaccine “gourmet” sidebar:


Wolf’s Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Wolf’s Chill Second Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox


Yes – I was “pro-vax” before all the industry, media, and government LIES built up to an intolerable level.

Back to the story on Moderna and Pfizer.

Here is a typical example of a Moderna recipient – economist and actor Ben Stein.

LINK: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/ben-stein-issues-warning-suffers-severe-side-effects-covid-vaccine-days-getting-shot-video/

The symptoms Ben describes are VERY MUCH like COVID-19 itself.

The Pfizer vaccine – surprisingly – did not have strong observable and immediate effects like Moderna. The incidence of anything more than a bit of local swelling was almost non-existent in the Phase One trial group.

The Pfizer vaccine moved up near the top of my “I might take this one” list.

Thus, it was very surprising that LATER, lots of problems with the Pfizer “clot shot” came into view, as the vaccine was being delivered to people. To some extent, I believe that the NUMBERS of many side effects simply don’t appear in trials, but THAT is not the whole story. I am now convinced that Pfizer is led by incredibly dishonest people, and that they very likely gamed the trials to hide problems.

And very ironically, there is some SCIENCE to back that up. The GAMING begins with the vaccine itself.

What’s interesting there, is that Pfizer’s data on biological distribution of their vaccine in test animals – which we had to get from the Japanese government – not only explained the nature and biodistribution of side effects seen in vaccine recipients – it explained the SHEDDING of VACCINE to others in close contact with the recipient.

This was, IMO, phenomenal detective work by the people who got that data. The Pfizer vaccine’s array of issues was due to the PERSISTENCE and SLOW RELEASE of the vaccine – as well as the obvious LIPID MOBILITY of the LIPID NANOPARTICLES. It took DAYS for the vaccine to release most of the mRNA into cells. The vaccine had plenty of time to move around in bodily lipids. It even had time to be EXCRETED in bodily lipids.

But NOW, I can ALSO use this same explanation for the difference between Pfizer and Moderna in the trials.

Pfizer basically created what is essentially a slow-release vaccine without telling people it was slow-release. VERY beneficial in trials – no?

Moderna’s vaccine also uses lipid nanoparticles, BUT their vaccine clearly deploys FASTER into cells. There is significant overlap, nonetheless, in cardiovascular deployment, as Dr. Hoffe notes. Moderna is likewise distributing throughout the body, and producing systemic vascular endothelium-centered effects much like COVID itself does, but Moderna produces symptoms FASTER than Pfizer. The vaccine effects of Moderna are thus much more noticeable – in some ways like the new shingles vaccine, which is a recombinant antigen vaccine, not an mRNA vaccine, and does NOT employ time-delaying lipid encapsulation technology.

Shingrix tends to produce rapid LOCAL symptoms on the first shot, and systemic symptoms on the booster, exactly as we might expect for two fundamentally different immune reactions (naive locally generated to injected antigen on shot 1, and immune secondary cytokine reaction to same on shot 2).

SO – back to Tona’s friend. He got MODERNA. Moderna SHOWS that it produces symptoms similar to COVID. Just ask Ben Stein. We have covered these “whole spike protein” vaccines.

Dr. Hoffe encountered his results using the MODERNA vaccine.

LINK: https://www.worldtribune.com/doctor-who-vaccinated-900-calls-blood-clots-at-capillary-level-an-absolutely-new-phenomenon/

Dr. Hoffe – at the time of the video – had 9 out of roughly 900 Moderna-receiving patients who were significantly (medically) damaged by the vaccine – and that did not count the 62% of ALL patients (estimated from a smaller sample) who showed signs of microscopic clotting.

Of those 9 patients clinically damaged by the vaccine, SIX of them are described as having “reduced effort tolerance” indicative of pulmonary hypertension. That is exactly what I have from COVID itself. I’m just lucky that my prior health was SO GOOD – far better than most others my age, particularly with my set of comorbidities like “former smoker” – that I was simply “knocked back” to somewhat below normal levels of health for my age.

Others may choose not to believe that Tonawanda’s friend was a victim of side effects of the Moderna vaccine, but in my opinion it is IMPOSSIBLE to dismiss this possibility. In fact, I believe that this case is an exemplary fulfillment of Dr. Hoffe’s warning.


In my opinion, mRNA vaccines are a fundamentally flawed approach, relative to a carefully metered and controlled ANTIGEN vaccine. mRNA vaccines have a “sexy” mechanism, but the whole concept is SCIENCE-CENTERED – not PATIENT-CENTERED.

Science-centered vaccines are a perfect fit for BRUTAL Stalinist socialized medicine, which treats people coldly and unsympathetically.

And THAT is why the Faucist conspirators and Bidenazis are deploying it.

What would Obama do, if nobody could stop him?

THIS is Obamacare – the REALITY. Brutal, corrupt, industrialized medicine.

Ironically – so ironically – profit-centered and capitalist to the core – only the negotiation with the corrupt capitalists is run by Soviet-style bureaucrats. An interesting mix of communism and fascism.

Reject it. Turn away from it. Refuse it.

W

The Obama future. It ain’t Star Trek.

Wolf’s Red-Hot Date With Retrotranscriptive Faucipox

Alternate Title:

Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective?


Gloating Pre-Preface

There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought.

Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY OF THE SCAM gets ahead of them. CDC is lying to us so badly. SO badly.

It’s all good, people. I’m on these bastards like BLACK on TAR.

Notice that the governor’s WIFE also tested positive later. But most importantly, notice how the news never asks the RIGHT QUESTIONS connecting the vaccine to the positive test. Instead, we get LIES.

Example: https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/06/politics/greg-gianforte-montana-governor-tests-positive-covid/index.html

Archive: https://archive.fo/PV9pN

The FAKE NEWS is going along with this crap. They are so deep in this.

Yes, we are now in peak MITHRIDATISM that they wanted to turn into the MIDAS TOUCH of SPIKE PROTEIN.

Such a SCAM.

In my opinion, the CDC should be CLOSED as a CRIME SCENE.

Thank you, Greg. You are a SCIENTIST, and when you felt SYMPTOMS you forced them into coughing up the DATA that reveals how badly they SCAMMED us, and how badly they continue to scam us.

I think Fauci knows exactly what I know. He could tell you EXACTLY why this happened. And once Rand Paul reads this, he’ll know, too. Somebody needs to start cornering Fauci on all this crap.

It ALL goes somewhere.

LOOSE SCIENCE that you know and everybody else doesn’t is a MAGIC ACT. BAD FAUCI!

I’m seeing into the psy-op, people. I’m seeing so deeply.

THE SPIKE MUST FLOW. AND FLOW AND FLOW AND FLOW. It’s the KEY to the SCAM.

Once you see the spike protein CORRECTLY, you see why they do everything they do.

How much you want to bet Bill Gates is wise to this stuff?


Real Preface

I have come to the conclusion that something is very wrong with COVID-19 and the vaccines thereof, and I think I’ve finally put my finger on the scientific macguffin that ties all the skeevy, sketchy stuff together – reverse transcription.

That would be that little red arrow back to DNA from RNA.

It turns out that reverse transcription, and vaccines for diseases that might code for it, are very “Fauci”.

Learn to code. It’s KEY.

Too many things “political, organizational, governmental, and media” have not added up about the phony “plague”. Going beyond that, too much SCIENCE about the “novel coronavirus” and vaccines being offered for them, simply did not add up.

At least, not until now.

It’s not my inner conspiracy theorist which is finding a problem here – it’s my inner scientist. I am having great difficulties rationalizing certain seemingly careless choices which have resulted in some of the most problematic and badly framed medical offerings since “eye of newt” and “really large leeches for anemia“.

I am having a scientific problem with TESTING that is so bad – so intentionally bad – that it borders on the freaking Ouija Board.

And FAUCI KNEW.

It’s all the result of DISHONEST SCIENCE.


Background: “Science Is Real”

I’m not exactly anti-science, having worked in science all my life. I’m not even opposed to “transhumanism”, which I don’t think is inherently and necessarily BAD. The idea of expanding my memory without putting Google or Facebook or anybody else in charge of it? Talk to me. I’m listening.

I’ve ALWAYS gotten the flu vaccine – ALWAYS. I NEVER miss it. That’s not exactly transhumanism, but it shows that, for most of my life, I had great TRUST in medical science. In fact, I would even say I still do. Generally speaking.

I’ve had vaccines for everything I could get – even the RABIES vaccine, when I was bitten by a bat. The rabies vaccine is, in fact, one of the STRONGEST defenses of vaccination in medical history. No vaccine opponent WILL or SHOULD turn down the rabies vaccine – it is a HUGE success story in medicine. If you get bitten by a rabid animal, the rabies vaccine promptly administered against that SLOW virus will SAVE YOUR LIFE. Some vaccines are of arguable worth, but the rabies vaccine is not one of them.

Indeed, I consider myself to be something of a gourmet, or at the very least a connoisseur of vaccines. Previous “reviews” of vaccines on this site have featured my lovely assistant, Miss Direction, née Retroculture, who helps me convince people that vaccines weren’t always questionable, and might even be good for people.


Wolf’s Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and ANTI-VAX at the same time. I mean, what’s the use of FREE SPEECH if we can’t use it to troll EVERYBODY – including PENCILNECK? Whoops – WRONG PENCILNECK. Let’s try …


Wolf’s Chill Second Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Perhaps you recall my PREVIOUS correspondence and “review” of the new, two-shot shingles vaccine, Shingrix – or more specifically, my review of the FIRST SHOT. Wolf’s Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and …


I was anticipating getting one of the new coronavirus vaccines – and was holding out for the first one PROVEN to be safe for recoverees from COVID-19, one of whom I happen to be.

My lungs aren’t that good anymore – not after COVID-19 seared them like some kind of biological chlorine gassing on the front lines in France. I have to be very careful. Another case of COVID, or pulmonary / vascular coronavirus vaccine side effects of comparable severity, might actually “finish me off”.

So – I’m SHOPPING. And I mean SMART SHOPPING. I’ve been paying a LOT of attention to the new vaccines, and trying to understand their technologies, their benefits, their risks, and the science behind them. I simply can’t afford to make a mistake on side effects. Not if I want to enjoy the retirement for which I worked LONG and HARD.

I already knew quite a bit of the science behind COVID and the new vaccines – enough that it has been easy for me to follow the scientific news about these things. I’m not a virologist, an epidemiologist, a vaccine expert, or a molecular biologist, but I’ve worked with such people for much of my life. I picked up a few key ideas in the process. I’ve also come up with a few scientific ideas and principles of my own, but that is largely because I’m a devotee of the history of science, which gives perspective on science.

If you don’t think science can be WRONG, and that large numbers – HERDS – of scientists therein, can go OVER A CLIFF, just take a look at Planet Vulcan, Lysenkoism, The Great Leap Forward, and science in the Third Reich – a seminar on the latter having been quite instructive in my youth. It was not simple how the scientific masses in Germany were led astray, once socialist politics DRAGGED, PUSHED, and SCARED them away from “Jewish Science”. The top echelons of German science, filled with Jews and their friends and spouses, were forced into horrible choices, as some of the best science and scientists were politically rejected over a real social stupidity which fractured and destroyed what was arguably the leading scientific nation on the planet.

None of that had to happen – but it did.

Don’t think we’re immune from scientific debacle. We’re not. Socialism is the greatest “hold my beer” knucklehead that science ever green-lighted into a dysfunctional relationship. He’s always coming back on Saturday night with roses and cherry vodka, after the “last” last time he wrecked Science’s cute little sports car.

Science normally checks itself for errors – and it is my contention that the checking needs to be extensive – all the way out to society as a whole – including stakeholder scientists, non-stakeholder scientists, and even the non-scientific public at large. Sure, you can skip the non-stakeholders and the public, but is it wise? Hardly, in my opinion. The smaller the group needing to be fooled, the easier it is to accomplish things which society simply does not want, or which have vast intended or unintended consequences.

Yuri Geller proved that scientists are easy to fool. James Randi made that point even more strongly. And I have my own take on it, which adds pushy and manipulative politics of any kind as a RISK to science. The same “sale by urgency” which works for salesmen at the appliance store, works in science. Many of us – particularly those of us with historical perspective – saw this problem in climate science. Now, we see it in COVID and vaccines. We are being rushed into something, for some reason. The questions are WHAT and WHY.


I’m going to assume that most people reading this, have started to grasp enough of the basics of viruses and vaccines, and particularly the new mRNA and DNA vaccines, that they don’t need “the way things are supposed to work” explained to them. Indeed, if you go out, and absorb all the “mainstream” journalism on COVID – science sites – mainstream media – cable networks – your favorite non-conspiratorial “science guys” – fact checkers – explaining the way things are SUPPOSED TO WORK, you will be thoroughly and smartly educated by excellent science.

If you want, try this great link courtesy of Ethical Skeptic, one of my favorite “dissident scientists” out there, pulling us back from the current “woke Lysenkoism” we seem to be in.

See? Yeah, I’m a grade-A conspiracy theorist, because I told you to look at Snopes, and not some clickbait site saying these vaccines are injecting nanobots into you to turn you into something non-human.

The PROBLEM with the conspiracy theories on vaccination isn’t so much DIRECTION as it is MAGNITUDE. It’s all over-reach. Silly, perhaps well-intended, but self-discrediting overreach. Much of it is clickbait or psy-op. A lot of it is actually true – at some small level – often orders of magnitude less dramatic than the headline claims. I can talk to the consumers of such in terms they will understand, and I’m generally talking them DOWN and BACK to what are more scientifically grounded problems with the new vaccines. And there are some. Which is the POINT of this entire piece.

In this essay, I am now talking primarily to what might be called “vaccination normies”, who are – like me – normally rather trusting of vaccines, but perhaps feel like there’s something not quite right about the current situation. These are people who have SOME vaccine hesitancy, but are likewise leery of TRULY baseless skepticism of science.

I’m talking about the people who put “SCIENCE IS REAL” yard signs out in front of their houses. There is a side of me that likes that. However, there is a side of me that wants to put out a sign that drops LOVE IS LOVE (Pedo? No way!) and all the rest, and sticks to what I know about science from the inside:

  • SCIENCE IS REAL
  • SCIENTIFIC FRAUD IS REAL
  • SCIENTIFIC GREED IS REAL
  • SCIENTIFIC BIAS IS REAL
  • SCIENTIFIC ERROR IS REAL
  • SCIENTIFIC DECEPTION IS REAL
  • SCIENTIFIC SELF-DECEPTION IS REAL
  • SCIENCE IS REALLY MESSED UP
  • SCIENCE IS STILL BEAUTIFUL

You see what I’m sayin’? You want SCIENCE, you get the whole, lovely, crazy, smart, dumb, dysfunctional bimbo who thinks she can handle SOCIALISM, and ends up on some frat party lawn in a lab coat and a mini-skirt, throwing her shoes at strangers, demanding somebody take her home, and SHE’S NOT DRUNK.

Yeah. I knew that crazy, wonderful bitch.


Wolf’s Take on Coronavirus Vaccines

You can check out my posting history here to follow the chronology of my thinking on coronavirus vaccines, but I’ll try to recap toward my current thinking, and what seems to be wrong with them. I am going to lead you up to my last post on the vaccines, where I almost saw what I’m seeing now, plus a whole bunch of other stuff.

That post:


Branch Covidians – Seven Ways To See Through The Phony Pharmageddon of COVID-19

PREFACE I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT. The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – …


The first news that really grabbed me was about Inovio – a DNA vaccine – a “Bill Gates” vaccine (almost all are, TBH) – and thus one of what I will refer to as genetic vaccines. Such vaccines are not supposed to work by modifying one’s genes or genome, despite the word genetic. They simply exploit cellular biochemical processes CLOSER to the genes, using the known biology of genetic expression. They dump DNA or messenger RNA (or a close facsimile thereof, to be more precise) into existing cellular processes, to “fool” the processes into creating – in the case of the current coronavirus vaccines – a stabilized form of the spike protein of the virus.

At the time, I noticed that these would be THE FIRST genetic vaccines being tested in or deployed successfully in humans. And this is where things get “iffy”. Just a little bit.

The next vaccine to get into the news in a big way was Moderna – an mRNA vaccine, again using a full and slightly stabilized spike protein as the antigen, but created in vivo via the mRNA genetic instructions thereof. While Moderna seemed to be successful in its first clinical trials, the side effects were noteworthy, frequent, and fairly significant – even compared to the notoriously “spicy”, arm-reddening-and-bicep-swelling, shingles vaccine, Shingrix. As one respected “pro-vax” scientist of my old acquaintance put it, they would have to kill him to give him the Moderna vaccine. He was definitely thinking the same thing I was thinking. Rush job, problems, keep looking.

My initial hopes quickly moved toward Novavax. Novavax is NOT an mRNA or DNA vaccine. It uses the same full stabilized spike protein strategy as the others, but it provides the spike protein AS spike protein, using a nifty little nanochemical “pincushion” to hold the spikes in an outwardly facing array, thus to engage receptors properly and at LOW DOSAGE. This is an excellent strategy that AVOIDS the unknowns of mRNA vaccines like Moderna, or DNA vaccines like Inovio or Russia’s Sputnik V.

The most significant risks of spike protein vaccines like Novavax are the risks of the spike protein itself, NOT of abusing the genetic processes to CREATE the spike protein in vivo, like Moderna. Indeed, Moderna scientists admitted in one of their first papers on their vaccine, that there ARE unknown potentials for long-term side effects with mRNA vaccines. Go find the paper – it’s there. They couch the admission in gentle and somewhat obscuring language, but the disclaimer is there. It has to be. They’re being honest.

mRNA vaccines in animals have not been uniformly free of side effects, to put it VERY kindly. We can argue about the severity of those side effects, and whether they extrapolate to humans, but I suppose we will find out now. The risks are there, and they tend to be long-term. So – in full disclosure – there are RISKS to mRNA vaccines. The older you are, the less the long-term risks matter, and conveniently, the higher the risks of COVID-19 itself. That’s a good thing. It means we only have to take the risks with those patients who can most likely afford them.

On the flip side, why the hell we want to take huge, unnecessary risks to vaccinate children is beyond me, but I’ll save those arguments for another essay. Or look at my LAST essay. Those arguments are, in part, subtle “history of vaccination” propositions that would bog us down right now.

In contrast, Novavax doesn’t take those risks. It’s a more conservative vaccine. This is why it jumped to the top of my list. An entire class of risks – the genetic processing ones – were automatically removed. As a “nothing can go wrong or I’m likely DEAD” vaccine recipient, I appreciated my better chances with Novavax.

BUT as a “real” scientist, I am not just swayed by THEORY – I love the results of EXPERIMENT. Thus, when Pfizer’s clinical trial results came out, I was IMPRESSED by the excellent antibody levels and the almost minimal side-effects. Far from being an arm-burner like Moderna, Pfizer was looking to be much milder on short-term side-effects, with stronger adverse effects being downright RARE. The large population of test subjects also implied that a recoveree LIKE ME was likely in the study by accident – and NO deaths or severe reactions occurred – definitely a GOOD SIGN for my case.

This not only bode well for lower likelihood of some kind of lethal short-term reaction due to my recoveree status – the smart scientific position would be that lower short-term risk very likely reflects lower long-term risk – and this supposition is completely absent ANY “knowing” causative reason to connect them.

Thus, Novavax and Pfizer were at the top of my list. Things were looking GOOD to take a vaccine, even if I didn’t get an explicit study on safety in recoverees.

And THEN reality started to hit.

Yes – when millions of doses of a vaccine go out, there are going to be deaths and injuries. We have a system in place – let’s be honest – which tries to HIDE the minority reports on vaccine adverse events, in order to keep buy-in on vaccine compliance. That doesn’t mean people should stop getting vaccines, any more than reports on horrible vehicle accidents OR the “hiding” of such accidents on the back pages of newspapers, mean that we should stop driving.

Nevertheless, my scientific curiosity was piqued. We DO have COVID vaccine problems now, and MORE than seemed to have been revealed by the vaccine trials.

WHY NOT DO SOMETHING ABOUT THEM?

I repeat. Differently. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH BETTER VACCINES.

Taking stock of the many positives and negatives associated with THREE VACCINES which gained the most initial experience – Moderna, Pfizer, and Oxford/AstraZeneca – I noted three things, one from each.

Moderna – side effects sometimes REMARKABLY resembled COVID-19 itself – even up to SEVERITY.

Pfizer – nursing home patients were testing positive AFTER vaccination – some dying of COVID symptoms

AstraZeneca – hematological problems reminded me of another protein hemotoxin – snake venoms

I could go into deep details about these observations, but in TWO of the cases, it was VIDEOS where the “light-bulb” finally went on. So let’s look at some videos.


Moderna: Ben Stein’s vaccination experience

As I was listening to Ben, I was stunned. He was describing COVID-19 – at least from my perspective. This was not coincidence – this was SPIKE PROTEIN.

WHOA, NELLY!!!

Note that Ben is still “pro-vax” here – he’s just CAUTIONING people about REALITY.


Pfizer: Nursing Home CNA describes correlation of vaccination to later positive diagnosis and death

This man, a CNA in a nursing home, reported online what he had observed, amidst great personal anguish about “whistle-blowing”. He observed that he had protected his elderly patients for all of 2020, but when they finally got the Pfizer vaccine, many of them just started “testing positive” and DYING. He was NOT buying the management line that there was a super-spreader – if you listen to him, he’s fully contemptuous of the idea. He was CERTAIN it was the vaccine.

I agreed with this guy – a TRUSTED SCIENTIFIC REPORTER, in my opinion. His GUT was telling him that the chronology was one of correlation. He was very likely seeing in his mind a pattern in a delay over TIME, integrated over cases, that could only be explained by the vaccine itself. He was NOT accepting the management excuse of a “super-spreader” fortuitously infecting the vaccinated, to give that same result. THIS GUY is my kind of scientist. SKEPTICAL of ad hoc, contrived, politically correct explanations that don’t explain all the facts and observations in a clean, natural fashion.


AstraZeneca: Rare but serious clotting reactions are enough to evoke CONCERN from medical professionals

I think THESE DOCTORS in the following video represent my position extremely well – the problems with the AstraZeneca vaccine are RARE, but we KNOW there is a correlation, and it is our DUTY to stop and fix the problems, weighing in particular the relatively lower risks of COVID-19 itself in younger patients, where these events are occurring.

The difference between IGNORING the rare thrombocytopenia incidences and FIGURING THEM OUT is the difference between Stalinism and responsible popular government.

I truly admire these front line doctors for their SCIENTIFIC BALANCE. Frankly, I consider front line doctors to be scientists of the highest order, just like that CNA in the video above. PRACTICE is what matters – not DEGREES.

Now in this latter case, the AstraZeneca vaccine, I dragged in what I consider a very useful analogy to hemotoxic snake venoms, but I didn’t really see WHY this would be happening – until I found something that explains ALL of these problems.

I just didn’t realize I was holding an ACE.


The Macguffin – Reverse Transcription

In March of 2021, I reacquainted myself with a paper that I had noted when it came out, in December of 2020, but had not fully grasped the significance. The authors clearly knew that what they had found was a big deal, and worded the title appropriately, but even then, I don’t think they dared consider the possible deeper significance of their finding.

Nobody can FIRE ME from retirement, so I’m quite willing to say what needs to be said. Could it be wrong? Maybe. But if it’s RIGHT, there are issues that need to be dealt with. So let’s go there.

LINK: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1.full

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/XWC52

New Results Comments (42)

SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome

Liguo Zhang, Alexsia Richards, Andrew Khalil, Emile Wogram, Haiting Ma, Richard A. Young, Rudolf Jaenisch
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516


I will refer to this paper at “the Jaenisch paper” – after the main author to whom correspondence is written – not because I don’t want to credit the fortunate and likely excellent first co-author Zhang in this instance, but because there is another paper I talk about all the time, dealing with masks, that I call “the Zhang paper“.

THAT one – the mask paper – in an embarrassingly good journal – is a piece of crap – some of the worst “political science” ever – designed to virtue signal to the CCP-DNC narrative of election-fraud-assisting masks, in utter contradiction to the very data presented by the authors.

The Jaenisch paper, in contrast, opens up a barn door that I am sure both industry and “in bed” government wants closed, Closed, CLOSED.

Stated very bluntly, the paper says that the virus behind COVID-19 actually “changes the genome” of victims – similarly to, though not exactly like, HIV.

You know – that OTHER disease for which Fauci was so interested in creating a vaccine.

And not only that – the COVID-19 virus does it enough to throw off those damn PCR tests that Kary Mullis warned us about for the exact same reason. In fact, the solution of that aspect of testing – the way “test-triggering fragments” just hung on and on and on in recoverees – is one of the BEAUTIES of the Jaenisch paper. The conclusions of the paper explain very neatly certain OBSERVATIONS and scientific conundrums that were first found by Korean scientists, who were very very persistent in proving that their COVID patients were NOT getting reinfected, as the fear-mongering American media “wanted”, but were still testing POSITIVE while being NON-INFECTIOUS.

Now we have a wonderful explanation. Excellent scientific work. THIS is why I signed up for science!

The THREE-TRILLION DOLLAR QUESTION that nobody wants to ask, however, is whether the genetic vaccines based on mRNA or DNA of the viral spike protein do the same thing – meaning get incorporated into the genomes of recipients. Well, do they?

Ever? Sometimes? Always? Or even just enough to make a difference?

It’s a great question! That deserves a CLOSE LOOK with MUCH SIDE-EYE.

I will say this. Even if these vaccines only get incorporated sometimes, that would make the “crazy people” yelling “OMG THESE CORONAVIRUS VACCINES ARE GENETIC MODIFICATION!” become suddenly – oddly – scandalously – CORRECT.

I find that incredibly ironic.

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR. And then, there is EVEN MOAR STILL.


The Spike Must Flow

I had set the Jaenish paper aside in my mind in January 2021, as I was busy being pursued by the FBI as an “insurrectionist”, having wanted to see “fellow dissident scientist” Dr. Simone Gold speak at the Capitol Building on January 6, 2021. Rather luckily, I never found her, or realized where she was. Had I found her, I would have likely been arrested and all that nonsense, since she wandered, far too trustingly, into the interior of the Capitol building.

This old wolf, too wary to go into buildings – too old to play tug-of-war games – too injured to stand up to direct pepper spray – settled for singing the Star Spangled Banner at over 100 decibels with tens of thousands of patriots outside – which was an absolutely surreal experience.

But back to the story.

When I began seeing more and more vaccine problems by March of 2021, some of the possible answers seemed to point to the WHOLE SPIKE PROTEIN being the BAD ACTOR. The trouble was, I needed disease-producing levels of it. How might THAT be happening?

Look at Ben Stein. He was injected with only a small amount of COVID spike protein mRNA, but had disease like I did, when, in my case, the virus ran wild making BOTH spike protein AND more virus from it, in my cells.

The vaccine does NOT create any new virus. It does NOT have the full virus instructions. JUST the main one – the spike protein that provides a significant part of the viral shell.

Thus, the vaccine cannot create an EXPONENTIAL GROWTH of the spike protein, which the VIRUS does. The full virus creates more and more virus, meaning more and more spike protein, until something – immune response – shuts it all down.

The vaccine creates a few “fountains” of spike protein – basically “vaccine-infected” cells – but these get shut down as immunity builds. It never really gets out of control. Or at least, not normally.

So, for Ben Stein to have a powerful, disease-like experience, he needs cells that are cranking out far more spike protein than we would normally expect with the vaccine.

Well, if the INSTRUCTIONS for spike protein – in some people – got a bit upstream of just “slipping them into the print shop queue”, to where entire new print queues of spike protein and substantial, chimeric, problematic chunks thereof were being repeatedly ordered from DNA central operations, it would explain a whole lotta spike protein and associated chimeric junk being produced – more than anticipated.

And – I think I would be remiss if I didn’t consider the possibility that some of these bogus DNA instructions might be hard to shut down completely, thus providing an explanation of “long haulers” and “immunocompromised variant generators” beyond their known suffering of what can be rightly regarded as “simply” chronic damage from initial infection.

But let’s move on the to Pfizer nursing home case, and many other reported cases like it.

If we’re getting genetic incorporation of vaccine spike protein instructions at the DNA level by reverse transcription, like the Jaenish paper, perhaps in older individuals who are more susceptible to this problem, then it explains them testing positive later – and in some cases – if they can’t shut it off – DYING LATER.

Now – here is where KINETICS comes in. Kinetics is basically process flow rates. I talked about KINETICS in my LAST RANT on COVID-19, in which I began to put all this stuff together, but didn’t really put forth the totality of things until the comments section at the end of the post. I mentioned in the body of the post that the kinetics of viral interference didn’t seem to explain the nearly complete disappearance of flu while COVID was still significantly above herd immunity levels. It just felt to me that BOTH of these would shut down with greater similarity, if viral interference was the sole explanation. In that case, CDC lying to us about flu vaccine efficacy, understating the success to increase compliance, COMBINED with viral interference, provides a nicer (IMO) explanation of the observed kinetics.

Now, in the case of partial genetic incorporation, the kinetics of interest would be how fast the body shuts down spike protein production by cells without genetic incorporation, versus shutting down cells where there WAS genetic incorporation. If cells with significant production of spike protein due to genetic incorporation were not just sources of more spike protein and more symptoms, but also harder to shut down than “unincorporated” cells, and elderly people were increasingly subject to genetic incorporation with age, we might actually see the AGE-VACCINE DANGER relationship that is being seen in nursing homes, where the most elderly patients are at significantly greater and AGE-INCREASING risk from the mRNA vaccines – something we absolutely don’t want.

Are you starting to see why this explanation works for me?

Genetic incorporation of symptom-producing protein instructions by mRNA vaccines of the FULL SPIKE PROTEIN seems like a REAL WORKHORSE OF AN EXPLANATION.

And, if you’re following my reasoning, you can see that this can also explain the odd cases of thrombocytopenia in some younger patients getting the AstraZeneca vaccine.

In the AstraZeneca case, we would be seeing rare cases where spike protein production after genetic incorporation was just cranking away at levels reminiscent of hemotoxic envenomation by crotalids – or in English, snakebite, which is also (in certain snakes with certain proteins) characterized by thrombocytopenia.

I will tell you right now – there MAY be very similar cases in older patients – maybe not – but I suspect that such cases are less “systemically identifiable” in older patients where thrombosis is more “normal”, and will be more likely attributed to age and NOT the vaccine.

And here is the kicker. In all of these cases, because of the chimeric nature of the fragments noted in the Jaenisch paper, there is a certain RANDOMNESS which could be responsible for the random responses seen in different individuals and different vaccines, which by using significantly different mRNA vectors, may result in significantly different levels and exact circumstances of genetic incorporation in different individuals.

NOW – if it turns out that there IS genetic incorporation of vaccine-origin stabilized spike protein mRNA or DNA as genomic DNA, like the virus itself, then one of the first suspects for reverse transcriptase activity or induction thereof, would be the spike protein itself.

And THAT, my friends, opens up a REAL can of worms.


The Full Spike Protein Monty

Let me ask a really impertinent but really obvious question – something that Tucker Carlson is famous for.

Why are we vaccinating people with the WHOLE spike protein, or more precisely, stabilized analogs thereof?

OK – now I’m being a LAWYER here. I am asking questions to which I ALREADY know the answers, and in particular, the answers that Tony Fauci might give. Here is my argument on behalf of Fauci.

“We don’t really know EXACTLY where on the spike protein, might be the BEST place for antibodies to attack. Also, we don’t really have time to start guessing, when we can just use the whole thing. Most of the labs are modelling the whole molecule, and sharing data. It just makes sense that everybody sticks to the same model, so that any advances that one lab makes, can be quickly adopted by the other labs and researchers. If we begin using fragments of the spike protein, then results are going to be harder to interpret from lab to lab. There will be fragmentation of the science as well, and this will slow our response time tremendously. Comparison of results will be much more difficult. The timeline to a vaccine could be extended by months – even years. Maybe never……..”

See how that works? I would make a fantastic lying science bureaucrat – I know all the tricks already, because I used to negotiate compromises that result in the status quo in fake science in other ways.

Now – HERE is the superior counterargument that will LOSE because Tony Fauci is in control. For this argument, I’m a FRONT-LINE DOCTOR. Maybe I’m even Simone Gold, or one of the various doctors I followed back during the HCQ Wars.

“Yes, that’s all fine and good. But we are doctors, administering a VACCINE to patients. Adverse effects are real, and we want to minimize them. The spike protein is almost certainly the cause of much of the endothelial damage by this virus. Anything we can do to avert that damage is smart, including NOT using the full spike protein or analogs thereof. If we know the primary sites that antibodies need to attack, which we actually do, we can just use shorter peptide sequences or protein fragments constituting those sites. Modeling can make sure these fragments present the same, active, pre-fusion conformation. We can stabilize as needed to prevent immune enhancement, just like in the full spike protein. This shorter peptide approach has been successful in hepatitis vaccines. These peptides can be created quickly and formulated as vaccines in roughly the same time as the full protein. In fact, vaccine expert Winfried Stoecker has already done this, using the receptor binding domain of the spike protein, and creating a short peptide based on it. Since this technology is well-known, we don’t have to take any of the risks of messenger RNA or DNA technology. Nor do we have to use adenoviral vectors or new lipid nanodroplet technologies. Likewise, all of the advances in stabilizing pre-fusion conformation in the full spike protein can be used for the RBD peptide, so the risks of immune enhancement will be just as low. So, unless you can give us a reason to stick with the toxic spike protein, I’d say this is a no brainer.”

At least, that’s the way it looks to me.

Now, here are some interesting facts.

First, EVERYBODY is doing the full spike protein. The ONLY party that made a vaccine using less, was Prof. Stoecker, and he got in trouble for it, with the German government, because he wasn’t properly authorized, even though – well – normally he just does vaccine work and that’s that.

RBD_Regional_Antigenic_Vaccine_quadrupol-Mutante-3.png
RBD_Regional_Antigenic_Vaccine_quadrupol-Mutante-3.png

Second, you should note that – IF the spike protein has any reverse transcriptase (RT) activity, that activity would likely have been LOST by switching to a small peptide dropping most of the molecule.

Third, you should note that – by switching to a small peptide, there is no mRNA or DNA corresponding TO that peptide, so there is no chance it will be genetically incorporated.

By now, it is VERY clear to me, that the industry picked the vaccine technologies that it did, precisely because they were modern and untested, and they needed an “emergency” to get these technologies into use, in preparation for their big goal – actual gene therapy. But – AND LOGIC here – that does not preclude there being even MORE motivation here. The more I see this “event”, the more I see everybody getting bought in by SOME new aspect of the scam.

Using a more conservative approach would have been SAFER, but it would not have advanced the technologies that were groomed to be advanced. Even the Novavax protein-based vaccine, fairly conservative, tests the novel use of nanoparticles to assemble the pseudo-spike proteins into cell-infective starburst patterns. It, too, is full spike protein.

But again, THIS. Everybody is ALL about the full spike protein.

Let’s ask WHY.


A Feature – Not a Bug

Now – if the Jaenisch work is good – and I think it is – and if genetic incorporation of vaccine mRNA into genomic DNA also occurs – and I strongly suspect it does – and if the spike protein itself is responsible to at least SOME degree in causing genetic incorporation – which I also think is very likely – then I am of the opinion that Fauci knew exactly what he was doing in pushing mRNA and DNA vaccines that code for the full spike protein, and that he did so as a sneaky way to get a reverse transcription promoter into the human genome.

Why? I don’t really know. Not yet. But this whole thing just seems intentional in its ELEGANCE.

This is easily expressed in logical hacking terms. Fauci uploaded a stealthy FTP uploading tool into humanity’s genetic account. FIRST as a problem, with China’s help. THAN as a solution, with the industry’s help.

The idea of “uploading an uploader surreptitiously” is just elegant. It’s HACKING. Any person who ever had to “learn to code” has to admire it. And it’s doubly elegant by doing it TWICE.

Stated in biological terms:

Create a genetic vaccine for a same-same disease, both containing the genetic sequence of a reverse-transcription promoter, such as a reverse transcriptase, as a way of creating a persistent or at least consistently available presence of a reverse transcription activator in humans.

And the beauty of this scam, is that it’s “WHOOPS” played TWICE. VIRUS, then VACCINE.

Let’s enjoy it! Scenic route…….

FIRST the disease – OH, NO, LOOK WHAT BAT SOUP DID!

The ChiComs are masters of psychology on Americans. First they whip up the cultural WTF.

THEN they whip up the OTHER side of Americans saying “don’t hate on Asian cultural differences!”

THEN they pull the whole offering back, with everybody left high and dry on CCP zoonotic transfer garbage narratives, minus “bat soup”, but including pangolin “look squirrels”, when the REALITY is that humanized animal models are almost all that is actually used for this kind of viral research any more (thanks to Mary Morse for this fantastic point).

Wuhan lab. Put ALL your chips on it.

MASTERFUL MANIPULATION, and many American academic scientists fell for it like soldiers on leave in a brothel district.

THEN the cure – the vaccine – which uses the SAME genetics to get MOAR of the uploader installed in MOAR people.

And if they get caught….”OMG, DID WE DO THAT? WE JUST FOLLOWED THE SCIENCE AND THE DISEASE! FULL SPIKE PROTEIN FOR THE WIN! IT’S *** SCIENCE *** !!!”

This is masterful scammery, IMO.

https://youtu.be/Oza1j2_WqBk

Maybe even more than Kary Mullis realized.


Rand Paul Nails Fauci and Cuts to the Chase on Coronavirus Variants – Are the Vaccinated and Recovered Even Getting Reinfected or Sick?

Introduction You have GOT to see the video I’m going to show you. It’s not just what they’re talking about. It’s WHERE IT LEADS. Most of the people who watch Rand Paul go after Fauci here, are concentrating on MASKS, because that is the TOP LAYER of the argument. But THAT is the small potatoes. …


Something is going on here, and it seems too purposeful to be mere incompetence.


SO – Does Wolf Take the Faucipox Vaccine?

Now – I’m gonna tell you – CRISPR-Cas9 vaccines are coming, and THOSE are straight-up genetic engineering. Save some ammunition for that fight. But right now, I think it’s worth bringing up some PRETTY TOUGH QUESTIONS about the current vaccines.

Simply stated – aren’t things with reverse transcription activity a RISK, like HIV, and why would we court that risk in a SOLUTION like a vaccine?

And what’s with all the LIES to keep people from noticing that the VACCINE causes positive tests in recipients, “because spike protein, sequences, PCR, and [COUGH] maybe a little incorporation”.



C’mon. This is so obvious now, it’s PAINFUL. CDC is not even looking foolish. They know this stuff isn’t the disease – it’s the vaccines. They’re LYING.

Sheesh. The whole thing is an outrage.

So. Am I going to take one of the current vaccines?

Not if I think there is a reverse transcription activator coded for in the mRNA or DNA, or even if it’s just in there as PROTEIN.

I’m quite good with my natural immunity, which sadly may ALREADY include some uploading of the uploader. I have no idea if I have any genetic incorporation from the virus already, but if I do, I know exactly where any future positive PCR test is coming from.

Anyway, thank you, Kary. You were right all along. They ABUSED your work.

W

Dear KMAG: 20200724 Open Topic / Vaccine News / Vaccine Horse Race / Vaccine Evolution / Vaccine Conservatism

This [(Q+7)=24]TH of JULY FRIDAY open thread is OPENVERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA / KAG! / KMAG world (KMAG being a bit of both MAGA and KAG!).


Start HERE.

https://twitter.com/SebGorka/status/1285929634224312322

You can say what you want, comment on what other people said, and so on.

Free Speech is practiced here. ENJOY IT. Use it or lose it.

Keep it SOMEWHAT civil. They tried to FORCE fake Orwellian civility on us. In response, we CHOOSE true civility to defend our precious FREEDOM from THEM.

Our rules began with the civility of the Old Treehouse, later to become the Wolverinian Empire, and one might say that we have RESTORED THE OLD REPUBLIC – the early high-interaction model of the Treehouse – except of course that Q discussion is not only allowed but encouraged, and speech is considerably freer in other ways. Please feel free to argue and disagree with the board owner, as nicely as possible.

Please also consider the Important Guidelines, outlined here in the OLD January 1st , 2019 open thread. Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven.


SPEAK THE FIVE WORDS BOLDLY TO OUR PRESIDENT!

I AM PRAYING FOR YOU!


AND WHAT TIME IS IT?

TIME TO….

DRAIN THE SWAMP

Our movement

Is about replacing

A failed

And CORRUPT

Political establishment

With a new government controlled

By you, the American People.

Candidate Donald J. Trump

Also remember Wheatie’s Rules:

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

Vaccine News

I started off above with THIS NEWS…..

https://twitter.com/SebGorka/status/1285929634224312322

For many of you, I can safely predict that this does NOT feel like “good news” to you. For others, it does feel like good news, but perhaps YOU are dreading being positive about vaccines in a movement which is largely skeptical of them.

MY MISSION is to make you ALL welcome this news, because you will FEAR NO TRUTHS.

To do this, I’m going to take you on a LONG JOURNEY to answer one question – Is Wolf going to take THIS VACCINE if it makes it to production?

Are you ready to go? Here is your first BRAVERY KICK. Repeat after me…..

“I shall FEAR NO TRUTHS!”

Are you ready to go? GOOD!


The first thing I noticed is that Seb Gorka – Q DENIER – is using the same GENERIC COVID-19 VACCINE IMAGE that measly Q blogger Wolf Moon uses all the time.

I downloaded this sucker back in APRIL, and used the original web URL in a lot of comments.

JUST SAYIN’. Gorka ain’t GOD. He’s just a small human in MAGA, just like the rest of us. He has to scrape images just like the rest of us.

Feel that FEAR slipping away?

GOOD.

Now – remember – POTUS is ALL-IN on developing a vaccine – and QUICKLY.

JUST SAYIN’.

Don’t fear it. UNDERSTAND IT.

By the time we are done here, you will be able to OPINE SMARTLY about what POTUS is doing here, no matter what your personal view of vaccines – either for yourself or for others.

Let’s look more deeply at Seb Gorka’s article:

BREAKING NEWS: U.S. Secures 100 Million Doses of Coronavirus Vaccine from Pfizer

LINK: https://www.sebgorka.com/breaking-news-u-s-secures-100-million-doses-of-coronavirus-vaccine-from-pfizer/

The United States government has secured a $2 billion deal for 100 million doses of a promising experimental Coronavirus vaccine being developed by the U.S.-based pharmaceutical company Pfizer and the German company BioNTech.

The two companies, which are producing the vaccine together, said that the doses will be provided to America if they prove “safe and effective in humans.” The Department of Health and Human Services confirmed that as a result of the government’s purchase, the vaccines would come at “no cost” to Americans seeking the vaccine once it’s available.

This is the latest vaccine candidate to be secured for the United States as a result of President Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed,” aimed at expediting the possible cure and eventual eradication of the Chinese virus. Other companies developing possible vaccines that have been enlisted by the government include Novavax, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Emergent Biosolutions.

Sebastian Gorka, https://www.sebgorka.com/breaking-news-u-s-secures-100-million-doses-of-coronavirus-vaccine-from-pfizer/

Here are the KEY POINTS you want to remember as we DIG DEEPER…..

  • deal is for enough doses to use (at least in the short-term) on PART of American populace – NOT ALL – although eventually there will be more than enough (see below)
  • it’s considered promising according to the TRUMP administration
  • vaccine is by US and German companies – NOT a Chinese vaccine
  • the US company is Pfizer – a key identifier along with BioNTech
  • conditioned on the vaccine being safe and effective IN HUMANS
  • part of Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed”
  • goal is CURE and EVENTUAL ERADICATION
  • staying on message – it’s the CHINESE virus
  • OTHER vaccines and makers have been enlisted by the government
    • Novavax
    • Johnson & Johnson
    • Moderna
    • AstraZeneca
    • Emergent Biosolutions

You will note that there is a LINK – and basically what we have here is RE-REPORTING of CNBC.

LINK: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/22/us-government-taps-pfizer-to-produce-millions-of-doses-of-coronavirus-vaccine.html

So let’s GO THERE! Here is CNBC:

U.S. agrees to pay Pfizer and BioNTech $2 billion for 100 million doses of coronavirus vaccine

PUBLISHED WED, JUL 22 2020
7:16 AM EDT
UPDATED 24 MIN AGO
Will Feuer @WILLFOIA

According to the author, there are 3 key points:

  • Under the agreement, the U.S. will get 100 million doses of the vaccine, if it works, and can acquire 500 million additional doses if needed.
  • German biotech firm BioNTech and U.S.-based Pfizer are jointly developing the vaccine.
  • HHS said Americans won’t have to pay for it. 

Now – here are MY additional key points:

  • Pfizer and BioNTech are actually running FOUR different vaccines – any of them that wins may be the one that “succeeds” in this deal
  • A 30K participant trial of the/a Pfizer vaccine is expected to begin later this month (July 2020)
  • The most advanced candidate is called BNT162b1
  • Candidate BNT162b1 has been demonstrated to produce neutralizing antibodies in clinical trials
  • The article EXPLAINS the logic behind the Trump-Pence (Pence is my addition here) “Operation Warp Speed
    • multiple companies pushed to increase the odds of a WINNER, SOONER
    • goal is ENOUGH VACCINE FOR ALL AMERICANS [not saying mandatory – just saying]
    • logistics assumes success and builds supply chains and SCALE while researching
    • note that this is kinda how the Manhattan Project worked
    • this is just the latest vaccine effort to get a federal green light
      • Novavax vaccine was similarly green-lighted at 1.6 billion dollars
      • Johnson & Johnson green-lighted at 0.456 billon
      • Moderna green-lighted at 0.486 billion
      • Astra-Zeneca / Oxford green-lighted at 1.2 billion
      • Emergent Biosolutions green-lighted at 0.628 billion

The explanation of “Operation Warp Speed” is useful, so you don’t have to be AFRAID of talking about it and being mocked by Democrats, should you use the somewhat corny name. It’s like many of Trump’s simple but extremely sound ideas. The names are almost like gatekeepers that turn away mockers, reflexive haters, and other people of “bad faith”, but those of good faith are invited in to get in early on the winning team.

Yeah, I smell PENCE all over that. A genius hire, to do exactly this strategy.

Here is Azar talking:

“This is what’s really unprecedented with President Trump’s Operation Warp Speed. We are literally making the commercial scale vaccine now as we’re going through the clinical trial,” Azar told CNBC. “We’re doing that at risk, using the full power of the U.S. government and our financial resources to do that. No one’s ever done this before.”

Vaccine manufacturers like Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and others have been ramping up manufacturing capacity before their vaccine’s have been proven to be safe and effective and before receiving regulatory approval. That will help shave months off the time it takes to ultimately distribute a vaccine across the globe.

“We’ve been committed to making the impossible possible by working tirelessly to develop and produce in record time a safe and effective vaccine to help bring an end to this global health crisis,” Dr. Albert Bourla, chairman and CEO of Pfizer, said in a statement. “We made the early decision to begin clinical work and large-scale manufacturing at our own risk to ensure that product would be available immediately if our clinical trials prove successful and an Emergency Use Authorization is granted.”

Developing a safe and effective vaccine is seen as crucial to curbing the spread of the coronavirus, which has infected more than 14.9 million people around the world and killed at least 617,200 people, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.

While the companies and government race to deliver a successful vaccine, regulators and company officials have assured the public and members of Congress that they will not sacrifice on safety. All that’s at risk, they say, is money. 

A very interesting concept – risk the money on any failed vaccines as far as premature commercialization, but END the “threat” sooner and win big on rebounding the ECONOMY.

THAT RIGHT THERE sounds like classic Trumpian “manage the downside to win” thinking.

NOW – let’s dig DEEPER STILL.

Why is Trump throwing the BIGGEST CHUNK OF CASH YET at this particular vaccine?

In my opinion, it is because this vaccine is showing itself to be SAFE AND EFFECTIVE already, despite being one of the “newer” technologies.

To see this, we need to go to a couple of LINKS in the last article.

First, some prior recent reporting by CNBC – clearly enough time (3 weeks) for the $2B to show up.

LINK: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/01/pfizer-stock-jumps-after-it-reports-positive-data-in-early-stage-coronavirus-vaccine-trial.html

Pfizer stock jumps after it reports positive data in early stage coronavirus vaccine trial

PUBLISHED WED, JUL 1 2020
9:05 AM EDT
UPDATED WED, JUL 1 2020
3:52 PM EDT
Berkeley Lovelace Jr.
@BERKELEYJR

Here are the key points, per CNBC:

  • Pfizer shares jumped after it released positive results from its closely watched early stage human trial on a coronavirus vaccine. 
  • The trial evaluated 45 people. Each participant received 10, 30 or 100 microgram doses of the vaccine or a placebo. 
  • Pfizer said the vaccine was generally well tolerated, though the experimental vaccine also caused fever in some patients, especially for those who were in the 100 microgram group.

Here are my added key points:

  • ONE of the four candidates produced neutralizing antibodies. YES. Just one of them.
  • levels of neutralizing antibodies were 1.8 to 2.8 times higher than in recovered COVID-19 patients
  • after 28 days, all participants at the lower (and safer) 10 and 30 microgram dosages had significant levels of binding antibodies
  • all four candidates are based on mRNA technology
  • reactions to the vaccine were milder than, e.g., the Moderna vaccine (*my* reading)
  • reactions were primarily FEVER and injection site pain, with fever being more common in the 100 microgram group
  • MOST patients reported injection site pain, mild to moderate, but it was SEVERE in one case at 100 micrograms
  • looks to me that they will shoot for 10 or 30 micrograms, depending upon durability of immunity granted by those doses
  • 100 million doses could be ready by the end of 2020
  • 1.2 BILLION doses could be ready by the end of 2021

Next, we follow two PRESS RELEASES from Pfizer and BioNTech:

LINK 1: https://investors.pfizer.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2020/Pfizer-and-BioNTech-Announce-an-Agreement-with-U.S.-Government-for-up-to-600-Million-Doses-of-mRNA-based-Vaccine-Candidate-Against-SARS-CoV-2/default.aspx

LINK 2: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200722005438/en/

Here is the MONEY QUOTE on RESULTS:

The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine development program is evaluating at least four experimental vaccines, each of which represents a unique combination of messenger RNA (mRNA) format and target antigen. On July 1st, Pfizer and BioNTech announced preliminary data from BNT162b1, the most advanced of the four mRNA formulations. The early data demonstrates that BNT162b1 is able to produce neutralizing antibodies in humans at or above the levels observed in the plasma from patients who have recovered from COVID-19, and this was shown at relatively low dose levels. Local reactions and systemic events were dose-dependent, generally mild to moderate, and transient. No serious adverse events were reported. On July 20th, the companies announced early positive update from German Phase 1/2 COVID-19 vaccine study, including first T Cell response data.

SO – we have an mRNA vaccine which appears to be – compared to other vaccines we’ve been hearing about – relatively safe and effective. NO SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS.

But YES – this vaccine is the NEW and somewhat unproven DNA/RNA vaccine tech.

So how do we JUDGE IT?

In my opinion, we first need to take a look at ALL the leading COVID-19 vaccines.


Vaccine Horse Race

The horrible China-Puppet WHO does have one redeeming feature – BUREAUCRATS KEEPING TRACK OF THINGS.

This URL is always a good place to go, to see where vaccines stand. Yeah, China and Bill Gates probably get to track the downloads, and maybe even infect the PDF file, but whatever.

That’s what I’m here for – to turn that nasty PDF into nice, safe, images.

LINK: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines

Let’s look at the FIRST TWO PAGES of the document they produce, keeping track of COVID-19 vaccine candidates.

What can we GLEAN from this stuff?

We can’t FULLY understand this yet, but we WILL in a few minutes. For now, we can mostly understand the THIRD COLUMN – who is behind which particular vaccine.

The vaccines are ORDERED in terms of how advanced the RESEARCH is – in particular, how far along the CLINICAL TRIALS are. The TOP TWO DOZEN entries (#1 to #24) are all the vaccines in CLINICAL TRIALS. #1 is the most advanced – which right now means PHASE 3 trials. The least advanced (#24) will only be in initial PHASE 1 trials.

So GUESS WHO IS AT THE TOP? (Look in the 3rd column for the developer…)

CHYYYNNAA!

Yeah, boy howdy, that sure is a surprise! The top three entries are all CHINA!

*eyeroll*

Then, number FOUR is the Astra-Zeneca / Oxford vaccine.

Then, numbers FIVE and SIX are CHYYYNNAA again!!! Think of that – the top 6 vaccines in terms of advancement, and CHYYYNNAA has FIVE of them. I guess that’s what happens when YOU RELEASE THE VIRUS.

SICK.

The next two are Western – Moderna and Inovio. Both of these have gotten a lot of press, not all of it good.

Moderna (#7) made the news b/c it came out with glowing statements about trials, but the fine print uncovered in the next few days was lots of serious side effects. What followed was a journalist pile-on, with lots of talk that Moderna has no experience, is stiff-arming the feds on safety, and is hyping more than fixing stuff. Very “Obama”.

Inovio (#8) is a DNA vaccine, similar to the mRNA vaccines. Look in the FIRST COLUMN under “Platform” to see the type. You don’t have to understand the platform quite yet. The Inovio vaccine was one of the first COVID-19 vaccines to get a lot of public attention, and is backed by Bill Gates and CEPI, as are MANY of the others. Gates is behind most of the horses in the race, so that he CANNOT LOSE.

Ask WHY.

Numbers 9, 10 and 11 are also DNA vaccines, with #9 being a Japanese effort.

Then come two more standard vaccines, Indian (#12) and Chinese (#13), leading off on the SECOND image / second page above.

Finally, at #14, we get to Novavax, which is the vaccine I like for myself, provided that it’s ever proven safe and effective (and useful) in people who’ve already had the disease. WHY I like it for ME, however, requires some explanation, but not yet – let’s keep looking at the list.

Skip over #15, the Turtlehead vaccine (made you curious, didn’t I?), which is also a vaccine that I am PERSONALLY potentially favorable toward. Seriously, it’s just a KY company (Kentucky Bioprocessing), and KY is in USA. But it is also a technology I favor as likely to be SAFE.

FINALLY, at #16, we get to the Pfizer vaccine. This is the one in question. Am I going to take it?

Not going to answer that yet!

Of the remaining entries, I’m liking FOR MYSELF numbers 18, 19, and 20, which include the GSK effort (#18) and the University of Queensland vaccine (#20), both in the news occasionally.

Of the last 4 entries, 21-24, thereby rounding out the TWO DOZEN vaccines in CLINICAL TRIALS, #21 is the Imperial College vaccine often in the news, and #23 is the CHINESE ARMY (PLA) entry – an mRNA vaccine, which IMO is likely to be STOLEN TECH.

So – HOW DO WE JUDGE?

WELL – before we can really judge, it helps if we understand certain basics of vaccines.

Let me provide you with something VERY AWESOME that I found online.


Vaccine Evolution

Vaccines, like everything else in Creation, are EVOLVING INTELLIGENTLY.

We just have to make sure that they’re EVOLVING HONESTLY.

That’s where it gets tricky. But first, we have to understand the basics of how vaccines WORK – hopefully WITH the immune system, INTELLIGENTLY AND HONESTLY.

Vaccines as we now know them are designed to trigger the immune system into THINKING we have a disease, when we don’t really have it, so that when we would otherwise get the disease, we are already prepared for it, and fight it off. This is a very smart idea which has TRACKED human civilization.

Smallpox is the disease which taught us about vaccination. Before the term “vaccination” was generalized to its current state of “inducing immunity to a disease by prior and safer activation the immune system”, “vaccination” meant inoculation (intentional INFECTION) with cowpox or a relative, as a DEFENSE against smallpox. Vaccination was EXCLUSIVELY a smallpox therapy. Very interestingly, the OLDER, more dangerous practice of infection with heat-and-time-weakened smallpox virus was KNOWN by empirical observation, and dated back to at least the Middle Ages in China. That practice was called “variolation”.

Thus, cowpox cross-immunity to protect against smallpox was a LUCKY BREAK. Most diseases don’t HAVE a nearly harmless cowpox version of “whatever” to protect you from real “whatever”.

Thus, what “vaccines” are doing NOW is much more akin to the OLDER and MORE DANGEROUS practice of variolation – a form of inoculation – intentional infection with the very “something” you are afraid of – preferably something which has been tinkered with in some way so that it no longer kills you.

Inoculation is POWERFUL because it’s more generalizable, but it’s RISKY because it makes US responsible for SAFETY.

You know – if we were more honest, we’d call vaccines something else, like “variolines”, or maybe “inoculums”, or – OH YEAH – inoculations.

I know this is actually very simple, but I want to CHANGE YOUR PERSPECTIVE on “vaccines”.

I want you to be not just INFORMED, which can be DISINFORMED, but to have real and deep UNDERSTANDING, which CANNOT be disinformed as easily.

Read the last three sentences of the above Wikipedia entry for “Variolation” to understand “what cannot be said in science” right now.

The method is no longer used today. It was replaced by smallpox vaccine, a safer alternative. This in turn led to the development of the many vaccines now available against other diseases.

See the trick? It’s a kind of “circle of changed meanings”, so beloved by lying Democrats. The potentially dangerous and generally iffy WOLF/SHEEPDOG of “inoculation” borrowed the sheepskin of the “safer alternative” vaccination to claim false but reassuring safety for what is really the tricky business that could be called “generalized variolation”.

We got LUCKY on smallpox, and now pretend that the same luck-magic can be extended to all diseases. HA! GET REAL, SCIENCE.

The reality is that the term “vaccines” is historical euphemism.

Read the history of smallpox to GROUND YOURSELF in REALITY.

SEE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_smallpox

AND: https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html

AND: https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/07/scientists-traced-origin-of-smallpox-vaccine-strains-used-during-civil-war/

Well, vaccines are now a much BROADER science. They are, basically, “tinkering with the immune system to do stuff” – and that includes STERILIZING PEOPLE by induction of auto-immune attack on their reproductive platform. One person’s nasty side effect is another person’s depopulationist panacea.

Have you ever considered WHY we’re not supposed to think about vaccine side-effects? It’s because “SIDE” depends upon your perspective.

“WHAT WE DO NOT EVEN THINK POSSIBLE, WE CANNOT SUSPECT.”

Yes, THAT is how big vaccines are, now. We can actually immunize people against PARENTHOOD.

SO – if you don’t understand vaccines, you are at the mercy of those who do. Be GLAD that the Hitler regime didn’t have sterilization vaccines.

Be CONCERNED that the CHINAZIS have them RIGHT NOW. They could sterilize ALL of the Uighurs and just move the HAN SUPREMACISTS right in.

Y’all see what I’m sayin’?

Why, with all the Uighur men gone, they could be sterilizing all the women – or all the men – right now – with just a SHOT OR TWO. Wait a minute. Somebody reported “medical experimentation” in those Uighur reeducation camps. Hmmmmmmm.

But let’s leave THAT for another time. My point is this – vaccines are a very BROAD topic. For now, let’s stick to “current ways to potentially fight coronaviruses by prior immunization”.


In that regard, I recently found a wonderful blog post which explains the different TYPES of vaccines being considered for COVID-19. This is an excellent article.

LINK: https://www.cas.org/blog/covid-19-vaccine

Classic and new technologies vying to be the first COVID-19 vaccine

Jeffrey Smoot
Information Scientist, CAS
Posted June 11, 2020

I could not have put together such a GREAT and SHORT summary of the different vaccine techs if I had spent years doing it.

PLEASE READ THE ARTICLE LINKED ABOVE! It’s actually a VERY fast read!

Now let’s look at the critical TABLE 1, which I’m quoting “vertically” and editorializing somewhat, based on a “monster” metaphor.

The table entries are unmolested. The entry titles reflect – somewhat humorously – my relative levels of trust/distrust of the technologies involved, and their state of readiness for “prime time” – expressed as effectiveness against “theoretical” pathogens.

Table 1. Vaccine Classification


Header Definitions (How to Read Table)

Type — What basic kind of vaccine

Active Component — may be abbreviation or acronym – GOOGLE IT!!!

Advantage — why you might trust this platform

Disadvantage — why you might NOT trust this platform

Vaccine Example — actual uses in existing vaccines you may or may not like


Bitten By Chocula

Type — Live, attenuated

Active Component — Pathogen capable of replication

Advantage — Strong and long-lasting immune response, usually lifetime protection

Disadvantage — Risk of disease

Vaccine Example — Tuberculosis, MMR, smallpox, chickenpox, yellow fever


Carry A Wooden Stake

Type — Inactivated (or killed)

Active Component — Pathogen chemical or heat treated to prevent replication

Advantage — No risk of disease

Disadvantage — Lesser immune response;  booster shots may be needed

Vaccine Example — Flu, hepatitis A, polio, rabies


Silver Bullets

Type — Subunit (protein, polysaccharide, conjugate, toxoid)

Active Component — Portions of a pathogen

Advantage — No risk of disease

Disadvantage — Booster shot often needed

Vaccine Example — Hepatitis B, HPV, whooping cough, shingles, meningococcal disease, pneumococcal disease, diphtheria, tetanus


Shiny Silver Bullets

Type — VLP

Active Component — Outer coat of virus

Advantage — No risk of disease

Disadvantage — [none mentioned – surely there are some – W]

Vaccine Example — Hepatitis B, cervical cancer, malaria


Bitten By Frankenberry

Type — Recombinant vector vaccine

Active Component — Non-pathogenic virus or bacteria as carrier of immunogen of interest

Advantage — Reusable for diverse antigens; no risk of disease

Disadvantage — Pre-existing or development of immunity to vector

Vaccine Example — No approved vaccine available


Chocula Goes Back In Time And Marries Your Mom

Type — DNA vaccine

Active Component — Plasmid or other expression vector

Advantage — Fast to produce; no risk of disease; reusable technology

Disadvantage — Lack of data

Vaccine Example — Veterinary medicine (canine melanoma, infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus of fish, equine West Nile virus)


Chocula Commits Identity Theft On Your Mom

Type — mRNA vaccine

Active Component — RNA that encodes a disease-specific pathogen protein

Advantage — Fast to produce; no risk of disease; reusable technology

Disadvantage — Effectiveness and side effects are unknown

Vaccine Example — No approved vaccine available


This is a great chart because it orders things from “oldest” to newest in terms of general technology.

First live virus (weakened smallpox, cowpox, vaccinia), then dead virus, then specific fragments, then fake Frankenstein live virus, and finally the new fake “like a virus” DNA and RNA mucking around science.

READ THE LINK – each type is explained.

Let me review the different PLATFORMS (column 1) in the pages of the WHO document. These correspond to most of the types in the linked blog post.

  • Inactivated
  • Non-Replicating Viral Vector
  • Protein Subunit
  • RNA
  • DNA
  • VLP

These methods can basically be broken into two different sets of two categories each:

  • OLD-SCHOOL versus NEW-SCHOOL
  • IMMUNOGEN versus INSTRUCTIONS

Old-school methods are “old biology” – no recombinants, no gene sequencing, no plasmids, no fancy tricks.

New-school methods use our advanced knowledge of biochemistry to MAKE STUFF at the molecular and biochemical level, either before injection or after injection.

Immunogen methods inject the stuff that triggers the immune reaction.

Instruction methods inject DNA or RNA – pretty much like a VIRUS does – maybe even USING a virus, or an artificial virus-like construct – to get those instructions into your cells.

So now let me apply those labels to the platforms, including one that’s missing (live /attenuated).

  • Live / Attenuated – OLD-SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONS
  • Inactivated – OLD-SCHOOL IMMUNOGEN
  • Non-Replicating Viral Vector – NEW SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONS
  • Protein Subunit – NEW-SCHOOL IMMUNOGEN
  • RNA – NEW-SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONS
  • DNA – NEW-SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONS
  • VLP – NEW-SCHOOL IMMUNOGEN

You see? There’s actually a lot of choice.

So – what should you trust?

THAT is for you to decide. I can only tell you what *I* trust. And WHY.


Vaccine Conservatism

I am generally – PERSONALLY – favorable toward vaccines, despite being 100% opposed to mandatory vaccinations. Vaccines ave always been good for me. Even the occasional minor aggravation of very mild arthritis in my injection shoulder is not really enough of a negative for me to skip the flu shot.

Nevertheless, I am careful to note that vaccines give me just as many and just as strong minor, negative side effects as any drug – and MOST drugs have minor side-effects that I can observe and report.

The new shingles vaccine, in my case, had stronger side effects than almost ANY drug I had ever taken. Nevertheless, a BARGAIN next to the HORROR OF SHINGLES.

Wolf’s Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Wolf’s Chill Second Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

So I’m no fool – vaccines are REAL medicine – with real side effects. AND – if you’ve gotten the new shingles vaccine, then you know that vaccines are getting STRONGER so they can work STRONGER and LONGER.

HOWEVER…..

The entire CHINA VIRUS psy-op and election interference program has done nothing to make me any less suspicious of vaccines. Indeed, it has made me MORE suspicious, if not an actual skeptic. Too many agendas. Too many lies. Too many “whoops”. Too many cute abuses of science. Too many media hit jobs. Too much Bill Gates near any and all of the above.

And CHYYYNNAA through and through the whole nasty affair. China, the home of CCP ChiNazis who love to BLAME THE VICTIM.

And which CHINAZIS could easily be STERILIZING UIGHURS with STOLEN GSK vaccine technology RIGHT NOW.

Suspicious? HELL YES!

On the bright side, I would not have been made aware of mankind’s current capabilities for eugenocide, had I not been “awakened” on vaccines, so I consider my new suspicions a stroke of good luck for any and all groups which HAVE BEEN, ARE BEING, or WILL EVER BE slated for GENOCIDE.

Uighurs! WATCH YOUR SIX!!!

One of the reasons Epstein was schmoozing all the big brains in science was – I am convinced – keeping track of the infinite bad possibilities that led to “Never Again”. SO *** DING DING DING *** I sure hope THAT particular baby didn’t get thrown out with the dirty pedophile’s bathwater. How the “this time we won’t fail” time-bomb of sterilization vaccines could have proceeded to where it is without being disarmed tells me somebody was fooling somebody. TSK-TSK. Shame on EVERYBODY.

ANYWAY – back to topic.

I think you could call me a VACCINE CONSERVATIVE.

I am not necessarily averse to any class of vaccine as I categorize them, or as others categorize them. I could take a new-school vaccine. I could take an old-school vaccine. I might take ANY of them, including the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, provided the following:

  • vaccine has been found safe and effective to TRUMP’S satisfaction
  • vaccine has been TESTED and found safe and effective for people who have already had either COVID-19 or any other weak coronavirus
  • vanishingly small number of cases of super-serious side effects
  • basic technology has no critical theoretical weaknesses
  • proven to NOT result in immune enhancement phenomenon
  • basic technology must show LIFETIME SAFETY in individuals and their children, or be able to rule out dangers – INCLUDING STERILITY in both generations – to my satisfaction

The LAST requirement is the one which, right now, makes several of the “new-school” technologies very likely NO-GO ZONES for THE WOLF. Much SHADE is thus cast on DNA, RNA, and viral vector types.

And as for the Pfizer vaccine (mRNA), I am much likelier to pick a DIFFERENT vaccine, particularly a NEW-SCHOOL recombinant protein subunit, neo-classical vaccine – much like the shingles vaccine I just took. Novavax is one of those vaccines. If it can be proven NOT to produce immune enhancement, AND it can be proven to be safe for symptomatic COVID-19 recoverees with lung damage, then I’m very likely to take it.

DNA vaccines, mRNA vaccines, and adenovirus vectors are ALL too new and unproven for me to trust. Some of these – maybe all of them – are relying on retreaded edge tech from earlier gene therapy failures.

These platforms MIGHT NOT cause cancer 50 years down the road, or cause sterility, or cause disease in CHILDREN of recipients. But the fact is simple – WE DON’T KNOW YET.

Remember DES?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diethylstilbestrol

Now – if I was 70 years old, I would probably take the very first safe and effective DNA or mRNA vaccine to come to market, not expecting to live to 120, or to have any more kids. But that’s not the case. I’d love a few more decades. If I had a choice – AND I DO HAVE ONE – I’d prefer a more time-trusted technology like protein subunits. Most of all, I would trust a vaccine that got green-lighted by Dr. Peter Hotez of Baylor University, an expert on immune enhancement in coronaviruses.

Adenovirus vectors? They already have “issues” of several kinds, including recipients either having or developing immunity to the platform itself. Perhaps not insurmountable, but there are other problems. For instance, we know that viruses have LIFELONG SIDE-EFFECTS. We’ve had decades to discover most of the important natural ones. AND – very disturbingly – we have a government health bureaucracy prominently led for years by a guy (Fauci) who not only forgot about HCQ and chloroquine – very economically conveniently for his vaccine and new therapeutic interests – he figured that the best way to deal with the inconvenient class of “slow, obscure, cancer-causing viruses” was to KICK THE PRIMARY RESEARCHER OF THEM OUT OF NIH.

Sorry – I would like to try these fascinating but risky modern vaccine platforms AFTER they have been checked and re-checked by a POST-FAUCI NIH/CDC/ETC.

And that doesn’t even begin to address this very important question. WHO IS MONITORING VACCINES to make sure that nobody is sneaking in sterility vaccine components? Components that were likely ALREADY TESTED IN AFRICA?

Is the Catholic Church even AWARE of the danger? WHERE is Pope Epstein-Guevara on this one? WITH the depopulationists? Happy to see humanity sterilized by the United Nations, as long as the “grave danger” of climate change is badly addressed?

Sorry. I’m not ready for any “mandatory” vaccine. Just on principle.

SO – you have a lot of choices in future COVID-19 vaccines, ranging from “none” to “any”.

I’m not going to tell you what to think or do.

But I hope that by addressing this issue for myself, I’ve given you some things to think about – so that your chosen position on vaccines will not merely be INFORMED, but FILLED WITH UNDERSTANDING.

And with that, I bid you GOOD HEALTH!


W

Remember when we could trust vaccines? We’re ONE election from heading back there.

Wolf's Chill Second Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Perhaps you recall my PREVIOUS correspondence and “review” of the new, two-shot shingles vaccine, Shingrix – or more specifically, my review of the FIRST SHOT.


Wolf’s Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and ANTI-VAX at the same time. I mean, what’s the use of FREE SPEECH if we can’t use it to troll EVERYBODY – including PENCILNECK? Whoops – WRONG PENCILNECK. Let’s try …

Continue reading


Well, I’m BACK to report my experience with the SECOND SHOT.

This was all something of a surprise.

I had FINALLY – in LATE JUNE – gotten to see a doctor [IN PERSON] for COVID-19 aftermath. This was LONG AFTER having gotten the disease in late January [LONG STORY] and THEN spending the first half of this year figuring out how to treat both the disease and the aftermath MYSELF [AND WITH YOU GOOD PEOPLE], mostly through internet rumors, discussions here, and self-experimentation by trial and error.

After all the discussion, the data gathering, the prescribing, the scheduling, and the blood-drawing, I was asked WHICH ARM for my vaccination.

“WHOA-OH!”

Yes, I had forgotten that it was only just in September of 2019 when I had been infected with the mythical disease of RETROSYNTHETIC DINOPOX – namely recombinant glycoproteins of Herpes zoster virus plus various adjuvants – which had knocked out my left arm like a line-drive baseball, and left me mildly sick for the better part of a week.

Was I ready for a REPLAY?

UGH.

Well, as I stated before, retrosynthetic dinopox is bad, but SHINGLES is far, far worse.

Yeah. Gimme the disease shot.

So – what has it been like? In a word…..

“SYSTEMIC”.

While I immediately noticed both soreness and swelling at the injection site, deep in the muscle of my triceps (back of the arm), most of the local effects were delayed.

Much like the FIRST shot, redness did not reach the surface for over 24 hours, and was not pronounced until about 36 hours.

In contrast, systemic effects were almost immediate. I could tell that something was happening while I was driving home. It was that uneasiness one feels at the beginning of the flu, or – COUGH, COVID-19x (more on “x” later). It’s somewhat non-descript, but unnerving – the unmistakable feeling of incipient illness.

Unsure of how significant these effects might be, I plotted a course which would take me close to both a hospital and an outpatient clinic, in case things got bad. Fortunately I got home without incident.

Once home, I was able to take it easy and observe things more carefully. I was feeling joint stiffness, dull and very diffuse headaches (more aptly labeled discomfort), and a kind of light tingling all over – a mild but very definite “electric shock” sensation. This sensation persisted for about a day, too.

Taking a brief nap, I noticed a dull ache in my kidneys some time after awakening. This was very reminiscent of what I had experienced with COVID-19x, as well as earlier [mild] episodes of kidney stones when I was not hydrating enough. I had treated both of these before with vitamin C and plenty of Gatorade and water – the same trick worked here.

By evening, I noticed that I was experiencing mild chills. These lasted almost all night, but they were gone by early morning. This is one of the more interesting parts of the experience. I don’t remember experiencing chills as part of the FIRST shot at all.

They weren’t terrible chills – no shaking – no chattering teeth. Just some goosebumps and a mild desire to put on a jacket in an admittedly cool summer.

I decided not to alter my normal regimen of vitamins and supplements. I had considered backing off on all minerals to ease the burden on my kidneys, but the truth is that I needed to treat the post-COVID endothelial damage to my kidneys more than I needed to go easy on them. This turned out to be correct – my kidney aches went away without reducing my mineral supplements in any way. Good hydration and vitamin C were all I needed.

The first night (or, TBH, morning) of sleep with round 2 of retrosynthetic dinopox was reasonable but not exactly pleasant. I eventually felt rested, but just barely.

My sleep was filled with recurring dreams of – as best as I can describe it – being medically strafed by small planes, the noise of which would shoot away a kind of weird ground cover grown by the vaccination and COVID-19. I won’t even get into the spiritual aspects of this, which involved American Indian converts to Christianity around the Revolutionary War. That’s a bit harder to explain.

These were not normal dreams. These were definitely “I’m coming down with something” dreams.

The next day, however, was much better. ALL symptoms were diminishing, except for redness at the site of the injection. I eventually has a “prophylactic Gatorade” before bed, but otherwise had a normal day, and even did some light yard work and heavy lifting.

Things were “on the mend” – at least SYSTEMICALLY.

Interesting, though, that by the SECOND night (36 hours), redness at the injection site had increased to the point where it was clearly visible. The total area of redness was as big as my whole hand and fingers. There was still localized swelling at the injection site.

Redness maximized by the THIRD night (60 hours). It diminished somewhat by the 4th night (84 hours), and was almost GONE by the 5th night (108 hours). I was back to “heavy work” earlier that day. At this point, I regarded the vaccination drama as OVER.

SO – the bottom line – FOR ME – is that the SECOND Shingrix injection was NOT AS BAD as the first.

Take that for what you will.

Thus, my final recommendation is the same as before. BE A SMART VACCINE SHOPPER. Listen, if you want, to what I have to say – apply it to your own case and beliefs if you so choose. You don’t have to do what I did – just know what I know, and consider whether my experiences have any bearing on yours.

And THAT is the way all reviews should be, IMO. We report. You decide.

Cheers!

W

LINK: http://www.pharmafile.com/news/522455/gsks-shingrix-scores-approval-china

Wolf's Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and ANTI-VAX at the same time.

I mean, what’s the use of FREE SPEECH if we can’t use it to troll EVERYBODY – including PENCILNECK?

Whoops – WRONG PENCILNECK. Let’s try that again….

THERE we go. That’s “better”!

Schiffty don’t like what he calls “misinformation” about vaccines. Well, consider this an OPINION piece, kinda like a RESTAURANT REVIEW. You can’t “misinform” in an artistic review of “so bad they’re good” side effects. Particularly when the flavorful review is comin’ from a connoisseur of dark beers, overpowering “old man” colognes, shockingly compliment-getting retrograde fashions, and KICK-ASS IMMUNE RESPONSE.

Not to mention wife-appalling HAWAIIAN SHIRTS.

Yeah, think of this as a CRITICAL REVIEW of the Italian medical opera Vaccino Zoster Ricombinante Contro il Lupo. Which as you will see is not exactly Springtime for Shingles, but it gets the job done and has the POSERS and LIGHTWEIGHTS among the “appassionato di anticorpi” running for the DOORS.

“Immunity? You want IMMUNITY? You can’t HANDLE THE IMMUNITY!”

Yeah. And while that FAT LADY named Zoster Booster ain’t sung yet, the VIRAL TABLOID NEWS is running for the phones with the STORY OF THE CENTURY!

STAND BACK.

THIS TRAIN don’t carry no PENCIL.

I mean NONE.


Now,

you have to understand that I actually LIKE getting vaccinated.

I was in school when the POLIO vaccine came out, and mothers BEGGED to come to school to MAKE SURE their children got the vaccine. MOMS talked about polio all the time. And so did kids. We asked LOTS of questions:

  • Why do those weird canes look like that?
  • Why do they call it the March of Dimes?
  • Can you still breathe in a wheelchair if you get polio?
  • How bad is the iron lung?
  • Was the president who had polio ever in the iron lung?
  • Why doesn’t the vaccine help people who already got polio?

The first time I got vaccinated, I cried, like most of the kids. The second time, however, the nurse taught us that if we laughed before she stuck the needle in, it wouldn’t hurt enough to make us cry – and she was RIGHT. And while this wasn’t the FIRST psy-op taught to me, it would always remain one of the best and most useful.

We knew we had to get the vaccine. Nobody wanted to end up like the “cripples” – or “the handicapped” as one said in more polite company. They were everywhere. You could not go downtown – even in our small town – and not see them.

Some were from The War, or maybe Korea, but by the time they cured polio, there were more people disabled from polio – or at least it seemed that way.

My babysitter – or “sitter” “for short” – was born in the 1800s. She was old, but tough as leather, and sharp as a tack. Nowadays, she would be considered “remarkably spry”, but there were many tough old birds like her, back then. She could recite hundreds of Bible verses perfectly. She hadn’t just SEEN wagon wheels by the sides of barns like we did – she RODE in wagons – covered and uncovered – as her main mode of transportation – long after the first cars and trucks appeared. She had perfect memories of two Testaments, two World Wars, and every kid she ever “sat”.

Most of all, she had experienced almost every major communicable disease EXCEPT polio. She could tell you ALL ABOUT THEM. Everything you wanted to know. She may have been a nurse when she was younger – I don’t remember. She did indeed live a rather extraordinary life.

Her BIGGIE was SMALLPOX – and she had the scars to prove it. While not all smallpox scars look the same, hers appeared as big, roughly circular, dark brown spots on her arms, legs, hands, face, and neck. She had some on her body, too, that she swore were there, but never showed us.

Compared to many people with more “pock-like” smallpox scars, hers were not bad at all – really more like big moles or nevi, though not quite beauty spots, so she never saw fit to have them removed, even though such things had become possible by the 1960s.

She was PROUD of her scars, and GRATEFUL that God saw fit for her to live.

With such things not only known to all of us, but topics of casual discussion, the idea of not getting vaccinated was regarded not as some kind of option, but rather as a misfortune. As in, “Did you hear? Eleanor CAN’T get the vaccine – she’s allergic to it.” “Oh, no. I’m so sorry for her. Are they sure? Can’t they they come up with a different kind of vaccine for people like her?”

All of us got the smallpox vaccine. The smallpox vaccine would typically produce a big welt on your shoulder, which would then heal to a big scab and fall off, leaving a very typical SCAR. The vaccine scar was not nearly as bad as a smallpox scar. All the women and girls had the vaccination scar, except my sitter, who didn’t need it. Sometimes you had to look a bit to find the vaccination mark on a girl’s shoulder, but it was always there.

Here is a good link to learn more about smallpox and its cure by vaccination, as taught in the context of some Fake Entertainment television show about time travel.

LINK: https://www.outlanderanatomy.com/smallpox-and-the-devils-mark/

And HERE is where we are introduced to the ideas behind Retrosynthetic DINOPOX.


THE IDEA OF AVOIDING SMALLPOX

by INOCULATION – basically “special, controlled, intentional infection” – using the smallpox virus ITSELF is called “variolation”. Although people didn’t know that it was a VIRUS, they knew that certain types of exposure to smallpox were “less deadly” than others. In fact, the rather horrifying idea of “sniffing powdered smallpox scabs” or “scratching fluids from a smallpox infection into the skin” reduced the mortality from upwards of 30% (the exact figure depends on who one asks, and at what time in history one is talking about) to only 2%. This was definitely practiced in China in the 10th and 16th centuries, and may have been practiced about 2000 years earlier in India.

The idea is that you will definitely get it, but it will be mild and you almost always won’t die, knock on wood.

Controlled exposure to the deadly contagion, so that one might live.

The next powerful advance, however, was not variolation but vaccination – so named because it used the much less dangerous COWPOX to give immunity to both cowpox and smallpox.

Finally, nowadays, when vaccination for smallpox is done, it uses not cowpox but the related vaccinia virus, which again gives immunity to both cowpox and smallpox as well.

So now let’s talk about SHINGLES and the SHINGLES VACCINE.

Shingles is basically what chickenpox looks like when it COMES BACK FROM DORMANCY later in life. And chickenpox is a bit LIKE smallpox, but it is really a different beast, which is not protected against by the smallpox vaccination. It’s a WHOLE ‘NUTHER POX – and MUCH less serious.

The chickepox vaccine was a replacement for what WE had as children – CHICKENPOX PARTIES – in which all the moms would make sure their kids GOT CHICKENPOX at a “good age”, when the disease was mild, the child old enough to understand English, and the outcome assured – a LIFELONG immunity against chickenpox. Not only that – the “recurrence disease” of “shingles” – which does NOT present AT ALL like chickenpox – was not common for those who actually HAD chickenpox, and not the vaccine.

Shingles is NOT a fun disease. I’ve had it once, and it tried to come back at least once. The treatment was the same in all cases – ANTIVIRAL drugs to lessen the severity of the disease and then beat it back – something that actually works rather nicely.

The first time I had shingles, in my early 50s, it struck one of the upper quadrants of my head. I thought that I would be permanently disabled. I could not even think during the periodic bouts of debilitating head pain – which was accompanied by a kind of overall sensory nervous dysfunction – something a bit like electrical shock. I literally began retirement preparations, knowing that I would be unable to function in an office environment any longer.

I was very lucky that the antiviral drugs kicked in quickly, lessening the severity enough to work from home, and eventually ending the bout with no permanent nerve damage. Had it not been for antiviral drugs, I would have had to go on disability, or retire early.

When shingles tried to come back, I knew the early warning signs – which for me are certain very characteristic lesions – and I got the drugs immediately. It was a smart move. The disease backed off right away. And although it never progressed that far again, I did get periodic “super-early signs”, which told me shingles was still lurking, waiting to strike again.

SO – you can imagine why I might want to consider the shingles vaccine, despite SO many reports of nasty side effects.

Shingles SUCKS for Wolf. A mildly sucky vaccine is MY COWPOX.

Only – it’s not. There IS no cowpox for shingles.

However, the NEW shingles vaccine – a very high-tech combination of FAKE VIRUS (recombinant surface glycoproteins of the Herpes Zoster virus, expressed in cell cultures) and IMMUNE RESPONSE PROVOCATEURS (meaning adjuvants) – is just as good, if not better.

A good description of the vaccine itself is here:

https://www.rxlist.com/shingrix-drug.htm#description

A good description from a pharmacist’s viewpoint is here:

Like COWPOX, which offers lifetime immunity to SMALLPOX, but through a very mild ACTUAL disease exposure – DINOPOX is gonna make you a bit ill. HOWEVER, in my opinion, it’s a whole lot better than real shingles, and well worth the problems.

Note that dinosaurs can be bigger than cows and are theoretically related to chickens, which however have nothing to do with chickenpox. How the name “chickenpox” was attached to chickenpox is not entirely clear. So while Dinos being Retro to Chickens is TRUE but IRRELEVANT, the SYNTHETIC nature of the vaccine is both true AND relevant.

The surface glycoprotein – obtained through recombinant DNA technology – says “this is what to attack”. The TWO adjuvants – including a new and powerful tree bark substance, say “respond to this stuff DRAMATICALLY”.

What is VERY interesting, is that the symptoms of this “fake disease” caused by the “fake virus”, which gives one much better immunity than even SHINGLES ITSELF (think about that), are actually both a bit like chickenpox, and a bit like shingles, only MUCH, MUCH milder than either – IN MY CASE.

I am only talking about MY CASE. More on that later.

I experienced at first a dull, mild pain, then very minor swelling, and then creeping surface redness at the injection site, in my upper arm. The redness grew within a couple of days to about 4 inches in diameter. The redness – which was HOT TO THE TOUCH – was still visible, but slowly dissipating, after the better part of a week.

The injection area – my upper arm – looked and felt, quite frankly, like I had been hit with a line drive baseball – but without any initial pain or later bruising. There was no sharp pain like a bee or wasp sting, but there was a very persistent dull pain, much like that from blunt force trauma. It was somewhat itchy, but not unbearably. The redness resembled – well – chickenpox. It was kind of bright and lobster-like, and NOT terribly rash-like. People might call it a rash, but it was not like an allergic surface rash, which thypically includes both edema and inflammation.

I also got a couple of ACTUAL CHICKEN POX – one near the injection site, and one on a random place on my belly. The redness matched the injection site, and the pustules matched my memory of chickenpox.

The most interesting symptoms, however, were those that resembled my own prior case of SHINGLES. These included both a kind of general, mild, “electric shock” sensation, over my whole upper body and head, and a stronger, cranial upper-quadrant, “electric” neuralgia in the exact area where I had debilitating pain during my first case of shingles.

However – and this is important – I did NOT have the pain associated with shingles itself.

The characteristic lesions of my shingles attacks were also NOT present.

Overall, I think this is quite possibly the STRONGEST vaccination I have ever received. The immune response is clearly BIGGER than anything I have yet experienced.


SO……

knowing what I know now, would I recommend this shot?

I would say, for anybody in my shoes – one who has NOT had significant reactions to vaccines before, but who HAS had nasty experiences with shingles – that it is a BETTER option to take this new Shingrix vaccine, than to endure the far greater risks of shingles. That is just my opinion, but it IS my opinion.

Others need to weigh the risks without any recommendation on my part.

Use what you know. Think about it. Make an informed decision.

Here are some links.

Pay SPECIAL ATTENTION to the COMMENTS on the last one, where people who had negative side effects dumped a LOT of anecdotal information. This is NOT useful statistically, but it is EXTREMELY USEFUL to know the DOWNSIDE RISKS. These bad cases will PROBABLY NOT happen to you, but they COULD. This information is VERY USEFUL in – say – planning that trip with the non-refundable tickets.

You know what I’m sayin’? Yeah. You know what I’m sayin’.


https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/shingles-recombinant.html

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/shingles/index.html

https://www.cdc.gov/shingles/vaccination.html

https://www.cdc.gov/shingles/downloads/shingles-factsheet-adults.pdf

https://www.cdc.gov/shingles/downloads/shingles-factsheet-hcp.pdf

https://www.consumerreports.org/shingles-vaccine/new-shingles-vaccine-shingrix-what-you-should-know/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chickenpox

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2018/09/new-supercharged-shingles-vaccine-has-serious-problems/

SO…..

My final verdict – FOUR out of FIVE STARS.

Yeah, Dinopox is all that, but I’m still waiting for something with a bag of chips.

W

PS – So what is YOUR opinion about the new shingles vaccine, or related topics?