No New Bioweapon Under The Sun

OK – we’re going to have some fun here – but stick with me, and you could learn A LOT.

Cue the music! Borrowed from Wheatie!

Previous posts helped put both the SPIKE PROTEIN DISEASE and the SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE into deep perspective.

We were seeing that the SOLUTION was a significant part of the PROBLEM, and that CDC was engaged in LYING, BLAME-SHIFTING, and HIDDEN AGENDAS.

And now the SCIENCE is coming out, and we were RIGHT.

We’re WINNING.

Another post discussed how – for whatever reasons are quietly embedded upon the length of the full spike protein and fragments thereof, chimeric or not – we are also now cursed with what appears to be, to some [currently socially tolerable] extent, an abortion virus and abortion vaccines.

Trust me – THAT is a trumpet that BRINGS DOWN WALLS.

We may even have a scientifically sound explanation for the craziest reports of vaccine side effects in the close but unvaccinated – namely, hormonal activities that are operating at the low microgram level.

Oxytocin – abortion dose = 10-30 IU = 16-50 mcg

Let me explain how that works. Think “DUST”.

I can tell you all about the potency of carfentanil. ONE BREATH of inhaled dust containing a tiny amount of it knocked me out like a roundhouse to the left jaw. If that ENTIRE DUST had been carfentanil, I would have been DEAD. But there was a fraction – a tiny fraction – of that tiny grain you see right there, that got into my lungs, riding on OTHER DUST, and I was OUT LIKE A LIGHT.

NOW you understand the POWER of the spike protein.

Yes, there is SO MUCH that they HIDE FROM US to maintain POWER OVER US.

However, now I want to put ALL of this virology technology into DEEP PERSPECTIVE.

**“Black goo” biological agent in the movie Prometheus, part of the “Alien” franchise.**

What I am going to tell you is almost certain to shock you – both about the disease and about the vaccine. It shocked me. That’s why I figured I had to explain this to people.

And what’s even WEIRDER – this is not totally about the disease or the vaccines, but also about their CONTEXT, which forces you to SEE them both differently and more CLEARLY.

A while back, I was just browsing the “edutainment” about viruses on the internet, when I was led down an interesting rabbit hole of viruses in entomology. You know – INSECTS. I read something on Wikipedia which bothered me, so I set it aside. It all seemed FAR too familiar. It surely impacted all this crap we’re going through now – I just wasn’t sure how. Later I came back and read it again.

Now, I understand. It’s actually rather beautiful. But – well – it’s interesting.

The greatest point being – THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN.

The great irony of the idea “nothing new under the sun” is the self-referential part – the idea that EVEN this little bit of wisdom is with certainty not even attributable to its first alleged “author”, who HIMSELF surely understood the great irony of his saying it, and that others might attribute it to him, someday.

Nothing new under the sun. This bit of Solomonian passed-on wisdom about the curation rather than creation of wisdom is far truer than I realized. Let’s EXPAND just a bit.

The idea that this universe is as old as it appears to be, and that in all that time, Einstein was the first person (using the term rather broadly) to discover the logic of how speed actually works, strikes me as a violation of Solomon’s logic about “first discovery” being rare as hen’s teeth.

Likewise, Solomon’s logic goes further and tells me that “hen’s teeth” undoubtedly happened a lot more often than, when in its earthly rarity, it happened “here and almost now”, but seemingly only roughly once.

Rarity being somewhat relative, with distance providing a deceptive but effective cover for number and frequency, all of them together being a control of wisdom over knowledge.

Yet even these seeming corollaries of the idea of “nothing new under the sun” are just repeats of the idea with some frill on the edges enlightened for our benefit.

“…it is curiosity that gives meaning and savour to life.”

LIFE. Seems to be part of the design. No?

Have I BOTHERED you yet?

Maybe even a bit of trepidation – or even FEAR?

Good. THAT has happened before. “Nothing new under the sun.”

You can never go wrong with Solomon.

The Last Time Gene Therapy Was Reinvented

I keep trying to tell people – DNA is very smart. We are slowly learning how to talk to it. Sometimes we actually listen. Sometimes we even plagiarize.

DNA bargains and wheedles its way into the future, changing in whatever ways it has to, to keep itself alive. It gains as much vision of the future and the past that it can, using proteins, to persist as well as it can.

Think of it this way. DNA fights and feuds with DNA, but who wins in the end?

DNA.

NOTHING that these foolish young humans are trying to do with their coronaviruses, their “vaccines”, and their “gene therapy” is new to DNA. DNA came up with ALL of this stuff – AGAIN – at least 100 million years ago. THAT was its destiny. Ironically repeating like its own form.

I am absolutely serious. The technology of EVERY one of our wonderful new coronavirus vaccines (or “injections” or “gene therapies”, if you prefer) was RE-invented by DNA approximately 70-100 million years ago on this planet, and is still around.

ONE example of a prior reinvention of gene therapy resides in a tiny biological war-game where THREE organisms cut a deal that keeps them all alive. I will point out all of the “original versions” to you, and you will see where human science basically plagiarized.

One of the three organisms is an insect – a kind of wasp – that gravitated into using a living host for reliable reproduction. The second is a voracious plant-predatory host insect – a caterpillar – that needs a dependent predator to keep its numbers in steady balance, because it won’t do it itself. The third is a virus that found a way to survive by helping insure that the host-guest “life transfer” process always succeeded, so that it, too, would survive.

DNA uses ALL OF THEM to optimally persist.

The key to understanding all of this, is a kind of virus called a “polydnavirus”. I personally like to pronounce that “Poe-LID-na-virus”, even though that is wrong. They’re actually supposed to be called “Polly-D-N-A-virus”. My advice is pick whatever you like – you’re probably never going to have to say the word publicly – and on the internet, your canine pronunciation is always perfect.

Or just call them PDVs.

Wikipedia’s entry for them is an excellent place to start.

LINK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polydnavirus

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/YHP7V

The bottom line is very simple. The wasp lays its eggs INSIDE a caterpillar by injection. However, instead of injecting a mere venom along with the egg – a kind of chemical weapon – the wasp injects a venom containing a VIRUS – a biological weapon. The virus provides biological effects like immune suppression that HELP the wasp egg survive, hatch, and grow. This is much more efficient than merely injecting, say, immunosuppressive proteins in the venom. The immune suppression by the virus prevents immune response by caterpillar cells known as hemocytes.

All of that is shown in the following graphic.

Here is one of the first really fascinating aspects of these polydnaviruses. When they are in the wasp, they are actually PART of the wasp genome. That’s right. They’re IN THE WASP’S CHROMOSOMES. The virus is now PART of the wasp’s genetics. One could even view it as the wasp sending PART OF ITS OWN GENES into the host, to make sure that the egg survives.

When the virus is still inside the wasp, it only comes out of the genes and reproduces in one place, in FEMALE wasps, near where the eggs are formed. It doesn’t harm the wasp, because DNA is NOT stupid. Viral DNA learned – the hard way – don’t shoot the pilot. Just stay in your seat until it’s time to debark. Wasp DNA learned – the hard way – let the jihadists sleep until we get to the airport we want them to shoot up. All of it mediated through the most annoying code in the world, with zero comments and nearly inscrutable, almost accidental language.

You remember those “well, it works” phone calls, coders. “I don’t know. Try this.”

Now – the next point is even cooler – because it’s the exact same strategy as the coronavirus vaccines that use viral vectors (e.g., Johnson+Johnson, Oxford/AstraZeneca, Sputnik V).

The infection does not lead to replication of new viruses, rather it affects the caterpillar’s immune system, as the virion carries virulence genes instead of viral replication genes.^[4] They can be considered a type of viral vectors.^[5]
Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polydnavirus#Biology

The virus particles that are sent into the caterpillar are NOT reproductive – they are merely infective. They don’t code for creation of new virus, which might reproduce exponentially and kill the host or use up too many resources. Instead, the infective non-reproductive virus particles – just like the coronavirus vaccines – give a nice, predictable amount of expression of new proteins, useful for the wasp eggs and larvae to prosper. The virus basically CONSERVES caterpillar so that it has a ticket and a ride OUT of the dead caterpillar when it’s all over.

That’s the EXACT same strategy as our mRNA and DNA vaccines. Don’t crank out too much spike protein, by cranking out any new virus, and thereby kill the host. The main point is SAVING the host. The point may also be STERILIZING the host, to some extent, because THAT protein effect is beneficial to the injecting parasites known as the Democrat Party, globalist banks, and China. And probably more than one type of pencilneck. But they do want us to live – at least for some time, it would appear.

But seriously – the wasp polydnavirus immunosuppression strategy IS the human adenovirus vaccination strategy.

The only difference is what the proteins that are created DO. In the caterpillar, they suppress the immune system response to the egg or larva. In humans, the one protein stimulates antibodies to itself, and possibly does other things which are intended or not.

So you may be wondering how the virus gets from parent wasp to child wasp if the virus that is sent into the caterpillar host is not reproductive. AHA. It is because the virus is tucked into the GENOME of the baby wasp, safe and sound, for a ride into the future. The virus genome is essentially protected by the wasp.

LINK: https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-77-11-2873

Thus, you can see how genetic incorporation of the VIRUS benefits BOTH the wasp and the virus – and even – in a weird way – the caterpillar. The wasp gets to control the genetics and expression of the virus, so that they don’t cause the wasp too much trouble, but instead yield maximum benefit. The virus can then be more effective at its now exclusively delegated task of immune suppression in the caterpillar, by relinquishing reproduction to the wasp. Division of labor creates a great mutual dependency, but it also creates a strong contract.

One could say that genetic incorporation is a STRONGER CONTRACT between the virus and the wasp.

Just like genetic incorporation of COVID-19 spike protein could be a STRONGER CONTRACT of reduced human fertility.

But how does the caterpillar benefit?

The caterpillar is not going to live on as THAT particular caterpillar, but THAT particular baby caterpillar-culling wasp will live on in an assured 1:1 trade-off, and the REST of the caterpillars which benefit by the current culling will also live on as a stable population. The C-W-V balance is maintained BETTER by seeking a more stable chaotic resonance, without the wild swings of boom and bust, if wasp reproduction and population can be more closely tied to the caterpillar population, and they all live into the future without wild swings in numbers.

Another way to view it from the caterpillar perspective, is that viral efficiency minimizes the number of sacrificial caterpillars needed to keep the necessary number of wasps alive.

Now – we’ve seen viral vector vaccines analogous to the non-reproductive but infective polydnavirus virus particles – those would be the Johnson-+Johnson, AstraZeneca, and Sputnik V vaccines, which use adenoviral vectors for non-reproducing, protein-creating, virus DNA. But what about the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines?

Well, it turns out that these {{{wasps + viruses}}} invented ANOTHER way to get DNA or RNA into the caterpillar host – those are called VLP, for “virus-like particles”. There is a lot of range and variability here, just as there is in non-viral-vector vaccine technology. So in the same way that the Pfizer, Moderna and Inovio vaccines use proprietary “virus-like lipid droplet nanotechnology” to get their mRNA or DNA into human cells and thus cranking out spike protein, wasp/virus DNA can also use a strategy of “virus-like particles” that don’t even mimic non-working viruses, and STILL get their effective DNA transferred to the caterpillar, to effect the desired expression of needed wasp/virus proteins in the caterpillar.

Now – that is not to say that PDV (polydnaviruses) and VLP (virus-like particles) are the only tricks up the ovipositors of these parasitic wasps. It turns out that – in addition to these well-described DNA viruses, there are also apparently RNA viruses which ride along with wasp eggs during injection. So YES – both DNA and RNA “vaccines” are part of the wasp injections. And YES – there can be genetic incorporation in the caterpillar cells – for their short lifespan – just as there is already genetic incorporation, long-term, in the wasps.

Remember – who wins? DNA WINS. The HOUSE always wins.

But don’t forget Novavax! It may just be protein, but protein shills for DNA!

Not only are the Novavax “pseudo-viral protein-based nanoparticles” already examples of virus-like particles – they are matched by protein-based components of the wasp venom, both free-floating or otherwise. Indeed, one cannot read about the virus-like spiked particles in this wasp venom and not think that Novavax design is pretty much the same thing.

NOW – this is all a LOT to unpack. Not just that, but my “dumbing it down” probably made it just plain dumber. To correct that, I’m going to let the experts FIX THINGS UP.

The field of polydnaviruses in insects is NOT a huge field. It’s actually rather obscure, despite the phenomenal importance we are witnessing now. Just as the media can help those in power hype and control a field like climate science, or literally HIDE certain other fields like [[[ COUGH ]]], they can obscure still other fields which radically affect you, by hiding them pretty much in plain sight.

There is a BOOK that reviews the field, however, which is EXTREMELY helpful.

You can download parts of this book, and that includes TWO parts which are more than enough for a reasonably smart normal person to see the CONTEXT EXPLAINED.

Let me get ONE of those parts out of the way because you’re not going to be interested in this, unless you’re ready to get VERY nerdy on the history of science. But I am including it because it is AMAZING STUFF. You might view this as “The history of the science of the rediscovery of all the evolutionarily discovered technology used in the “vaccines” or “shots” or “gene therapy” of the coronavirus genetic injections”. It’s a beautiful window into HOW SCIENCE WORKS.

Foreword – The Discovery of Polydnaviruses and the Influence of Dr. George Salt

You can download a PDF of this at the linked page.

Now – if you read that – you will get a LOT, including a window into the slow and painful nature of research, but it’s a bit difficult to extract the good stuff if you’re not used to reading scientific review literature.

In contrast, the PREFACE of the book is MUCH easier to read, and it puts ALL this stuff in context that normal humans who are not experts in polydnaviruses can understand.

Preface – Parasitoid Viruses – Symbionts and Pathogens

I highly encourage you to read the full preface at the linked page. But what I’m going to do here is simply pull out all kinds of juicy quotes – which is damn near the whole thing. [ My comments ] and identified WOW sequences will be in bold.

Here we go – this is all quoting:

Among parasitoid viruses, the fascinating models of polydnaviruses (PDVs) were discovered in the 1970s and the new field of polydnavirology was thus opened.
This field has been moving very fast since the beginning of the century thanks to the use of genomic approaches and rapid expansion of accessible databases on insect and viral gene sequences.
Parasitoid and viral genomic studies have confirmed that PDVs are functionally gene transfer agents used by parasitoid wasps to manipulate the physiology of their parasitized lepidopteran hosts by introducing modified versions of their own genes into host cells.
In the case of PDVs from braconid wasps, this kind of gene therapy (detrimental for the patient, which is in this case the lepidopteran host!) originated from the integration of a virus genome in a wasp genome ca. 100 million years ago. [LOL – I just noticed this “being impressed by the date” part – looks like we BOTH realized this independently. -Wolf]
This virus has been modified to incorporate wasp genes instead of its own viral genome in the nucleocapsids inside the viral particles. [Minor beef here – ownership and original genetic penmanship on the payload could be more “virus” and less “wasp” – interesting problem.]
Such use of viruses as vectors has been selected several times independently during the evolution of parasitoid wasps. [There it is. VIRAL VECTORS. Invented by DNA.]
The PDVs associated with braconid and ichneumonid wasps (Campopleginae subfamily) are unrelated as judged from the machinery producing the particles, and they represent an example of convergent evolution with different viral origins.
A third association event is suspected to have occurred in the Banchinae subfamily of ichneumonid wasps. In essence, the parasitoids have ‘captured’ viral elements that have evolved a host regulatory role that benefits the parasitoid to facilitate successful parasitism. [This is more “archaeopteryx” on the payload being of viral origin.]
Other associations with viruses or virus-like particles might have evolved with different organisms but they have not been unraveled yet, and parasitic amoebae that have associations with mammalian viruses are just one example. [“Lots of room at the bottom.”]
Many insects have evolved associations with a large number of species of bacteria such as Wolbachia and associations with viruses have been less well studied to date compared to bacterial symbionts.
A number of different viruses are found in the genital tract of the parasitoid wasps and conceivably they could be transferred to female wasps by behavioral traits, such as host feeding, initiated following ovipositor puncture of the surface of the integument.
Host feeding may thus be an advantageous behavior for viruses which facilitates their spread within insect populations and this intimate association with viruses might have favored interactions leading in some cases to integration of viral sequences into the wasp genome, although most of the wasps described in this book are no longer host feeders.
These viruses include RNA viruses of insect parasitoids and most of them appear nonpathogenic. Could these likewise have evolved a symbiotic relationship with their host? Future research may reveal such an intimate relationship with the wasp host carrying them but, currently, we have little information about their functional role as symbionts or pathogens in the virus–wasp–insect host relationship. [This was in 2012 – the situation could be different now.]
While the study of polydnaviruses was initially inspired by the pioneering studies of George Salt and Susan Rotheram at Cambridge University, more recent studies of Venturia (formerly Nemeritis) canescens particles (the virus-like agent studied by George Salt) by Otto Schmidt and Sassan Asgari documented that these virus-like virions lack both DNA and RNA; the particles are comprised of proteins encoded by parasitoid genes. [This is basically virus-like particle nanotechnology akin to the Novavax vaccine.]
The multiplicity of different molecular forms seen in these viruses and virus-like particles is truly amazing but, compared to polydnaviruses, we have less information about the biology of virus-like particles and how they function. [There is clearly an infinitude of possibility here – clearly WHY the push for gene therapy.]
Finally, not all parasitoid species are associated with viruses and most in this category have to rely on virulence factors produced by their ovaries and venom glands instead of using the host to produce them like for PDV-encoded gene products. [Translation – most of the wasps use plain old venom.]
PDV-associated species also produce venom that was shown in some cases to synergize the effect of the virus. [Combination biological and chemical weaponry.]
New sequencing approaches are more comprehensive and will thus allow comparisons of the arsenal of proteins used in different species, which will enhance our understanding of the dynamics of evolution of parasitoid virulence strategies. [Big data will allow spying on the past to happen even faster.]
Ectoparasitic wasps have not been examined yet for the presence of viral symbionts, and appear to have exploited venoms as a source of host regulatory molecules instead. Comparative studies on paralyzing versus nonparalytic venoms are lacking, and screening ectoparasitic species for viral elements should also be a future research priority. [Translation: there’s more to learn from regular stinging / paralyzing wasps.]
In addition to enhancing our knowledge of parasitoid strategies and increasing our understanding of the importance of symbiotic relationships in species evolution, parasitoid viruses and venoms may constitute a source of new molecules to control insect pests. This might be a revolutionary outcome of research on PDVs and other parasitoid viruses, since the safety of many chemical pesticides with respect to their detrimental impacts on human health and key species in the environment such as bees and other beneficial insects, is questioned. [You think proteins are going to be safer? HA! Get ready for new problems.] We anticipate that harvesting biopesticidal molecules from parasitoid venoms will likewise prove fruitful. [Translation: All this human wasp techno coronavirus lying crap is headed to agriculture, and presumably already there. Yeah.]
Finally, we hope that this book will satisfy the reader by presenting an overview of the most recent findings on all these topics presented by an international assemblage of authors. [You can say that again!]
In addition, we aim to inspire many future researchers to choose polydnavirology or studies of other parasitoid viruses or viral-like elements and venoms as their focus field. [You’ve inspired me, even though it’s a bit late for me to enroll in one more Marxist university.]

That’s it.

I tell you – this whole thing was a revelation. Suddenly, everything these people in Big Pharma have been doing has been HUMBLED BY GOD, using BUGS. LOL! Pretty amazing.

And being humbled, all of us, the TRUTH now becomes clear.

Now – if all this seems a bit scary, but you’re thinking “Hey, this isn’t exactly like our case, in which Democrats mind-fracked their victims with an RNA virus” – well, HOLD YOUR BEERS. With God – IRONICALLY – all things are possible.

Yes, this, too – baffling the victim with an RNA virus – was borrowed from nature, although I am being just a wee bit facetious, since it was done much more intelligently and much more socially against a more intelligent and social species.

The Case of the Shanghaied Babysitter

Yeah, I’ll try to keep this one shorter, but I don’t really have to go back TOO MUCH to the original literature here.

Here is where I FOUND this case originally. An article that was COPIED onto a forum.

Parasitic wasp uses virus to control its host

LINK: https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/parasitic-wasp-uses-virus-to-control-its-host.332664/

The links back to this forum article are ALL bad, but I was able to google for correct ones. Here is the article in Discover Magazine:

Biological Warfare: Parasitic Wasp Uses A Virus To Control Its Host

Science Sushi By Christie Wilcox Feb 11, 2015 2:36 AM

LINK: https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/biological-warfare-parasitic-wasp-uses-a-virus-to-control-its-host

THAT article goes back to THIS scientific literature:

LINK: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2014.2773

This is actually a very long and complete scientific article. Let me give you the “TL;DR” version.

When the wasp lays an egg in the ladybug, it also injects an RNA virus. That virus makes the ladybug go “mask Karen” crazy, and stick around and GUARD the pupated larval wasp after it emerges from the ladybug and cocoons. The ladybug may then even kick the virus and go on living after the young wasp departs.

Yeah, let me HIGH FIVE that long-hauler ladybug.

Just sayin’.

Democrats.

SPIT.

SO – where are we now?

Is Phony Gene Therapy About Population Control?

We have now looked at the COVER PRESENT (coronavirus and vaccines), the EFFECTIVE PRESENT (spike protein virus and vaccines), the LIKELY DEEPER MOTIVATING PRESENT (contraceptive / abortive virus and “vaccines” that look pretty much like public “health” gene therapy), and the PURPOSED ORIGINAL HONEST PAST (infection and/or genetic modification of the injected to produce desired effects using RNA viruses and/or specialized viral vectors) – the latter insect past being a lot like what is happening now.

Are you ready for the FUTURE?

Well, there’s a lot of range on that. Maybe it’s THIS…..

Now I know a lot of y’all are, like me, saying “Yeah, that will be a cold day in hell!” But let’s consider it anyway. It helps to understand things.

WHY would Hillary say this, about Trump’s possible winning in 2016?

What crime could POSSIBLY send hundreds of historic conspirators to some horrible fate like what happened to the NAZIS? They would have had to have done something even more horrible – right?

Well, viewed in “holocaust” (small “h”) terms, an “abortion virus” followed by “abortion vaccines” might count.

It’s a pretty ingenious idea. If you honestly believe that overpopulation threatens the planet, and that stopping it “by any means necessary” is justified, then the idea of:

taking a modifiable cold virus but…..
don’t call it that, so people will be AFRAID
warm up the FEAR CROWD with SARS, Ebola, Zika, etc.
use a cold with its own moderate antiprogestogenic or oxytocin hormonal activity, or some other way of exerting a contraceptive or abortive activity
optionally increase that activity
release the virus
create vaccines with the same effect
require ongoing vaccines to titrate the effect on society

To me, this is very much like the wasp strategy, only instead of hijacking the juvenile butterfly with immunosuppressive negative gene therapy in a PRO-FERTILITY strategy for its own offspring, what the Democrats are doing is an ANTI-FERTILITY strategy using progestosuppressive negative gene therapy on basically all humans who are not in on the scam. And they also used an RNA virus to mess with our minds, though THAT was a bit artful, shall we say.

Now, I think the success or failure of their operation is going to depend on the ultimate level of contraception that is achieved here. The effect on society will depend on whether the Dems, globalists, and Chinese are trying to pull off a very steep and fast population drop that would generate a social immune reaction, or a long, slow, incremental one that would not. We probably won’t know this for several years.

But just consider this “back of the envelope” calculation.

Let’s say that Demmunists require 2 coronavirus boosters every year. Say that between compliance and effectiveness, ONE of those boosters is effectively pregnancy-blocking for any pregnancy currently in process. Run this over all of humanity, so that once every year, every woman is hit with a “menstruation and miscarriage vaccine” using the spike protein. With a pregnancy window of 75% of the year, that target is the broad side of a barn, as long as CDC continues to insist that it’s safe for pregnant women, or women who are trying to become pregnant. You would get massive observable menstruation and miscarriages after vaccination, and the plot would not last.

It’s not a SUSTAINABLE LIE.

BUT – as long as the effect is random, subtle, and single-digits, it can be hidden by a compliant scientific community, which is socially conditioned to reject the truth. Even bigger, control of social media, communications, and other avenues of discovering the truth, mean society can be kept completely blind to a subtle population control.

But seriously – reducing the fertility of humans by 5% is a BIG DEAL. It doesn’t mean it’s the end of it. It’s a GOOD BEGINNING – from their point of view.

You’ve got to look at this thing, like you’re trying to pull it off, to see that you really COULD pull it off.

And if we could pull it off, they will pull it off.

So – that’s where I’m at.

And if I’m right, they will NEVER FACE JUSTICE for what they’re doing.

So here is a rule about Democrats.

Democrats, China and other communists will always pick an unjust fait accompli over a just agreement.

Thus, as long as they do things where the price of tolerating their crimes is less than the cost of a civil war, they will just keep doing those things.

Something to think about.

W

Wolf’s Red-Hot Date With Retrotranscriptive Faucipox

Alternate Title:

Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective?

Gloating Pre-Preface

There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought.

Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY OF THE SCAM gets ahead of them. CDC is lying to us so badly. SO badly.

It’s all good, people. I’m on these bastards like BLACK on TAR.

Notice that the governor’s WIFE also tested positive later. But most importantly, notice how the news never asks the RIGHT QUESTIONS connecting the vaccine to the positive test. Instead, we get LIES.

Example: https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/06/politics/greg-gianforte-montana-governor-tests-positive-covid/index.html

Archive: https://archive.fo/PV9pN

The FAKE NEWS is going along with this crap. They are so deep in this.

Yes, we are now in peak MITHRIDATISM that they wanted to turn into the MIDAS TOUCH of SPIKE PROTEIN.

Such a SCAM.

In my opinion, the CDC should be CLOSED as a CRIME SCENE.

Thank you, Greg. You are a SCIENTIST, and when you felt SYMPTOMS you forced them into coughing up the DATA that reveals how badly they SCAMMED us, and how badly they continue to scam us.

I think Fauci knows exactly what I know. He could tell you EXACTLY why this happened. And once Rand Paul reads this, he’ll know, too. Somebody needs to start cornering Fauci on all this crap.

It ALL goes somewhere.

LOOSE SCIENCE that you know and everybody else doesn’t is a MAGIC ACT. BAD FAUCI!

I’m seeing into the psy-op, people. I’m seeing so deeply.

THE SPIKE MUST FLOW. AND FLOW AND FLOW AND FLOW. It’s the KEY to the SCAM.

Once you see the spike protein CORRECTLY, you see why they do everything they do.

How much you want to bet Bill Gates is wise to this stuff?

Real Preface

I have come to the conclusion that something is very wrong with COVID-19 and the vaccines thereof, and I think I’ve finally put my finger on the scientific macguffin that ties all the skeevy, sketchy stuff together – reverse transcription.

That would be that little red arrow back to DNA from RNA.

It turns out that reverse transcription, and vaccines for diseases that might code for it, are very “Fauci”.

Learn to code. It’s KEY.

Too many things “political, organizational, governmental, and media” have not added up about the phony “plague”. Going beyond that, too much SCIENCE about the “novel coronavirus” and vaccines being offered for them, simply did not add up.

At least, not until now.

It’s not my inner conspiracy theorist which is finding a problem here – it’s my inner scientist. I am having great difficulties rationalizing certain seemingly careless choices which have resulted in some of the most problematic and badly framed medical offerings since “eye of newt” and “really large leeches for anemia“.

I am having a scientific problem with TESTING that is so bad – so intentionally bad – that it borders on the freaking Ouija Board.

And FAUCI KNEW.

It’s all the result of DISHONEST SCIENCE.

Background: “Science Is Real”

I’m not exactly anti-science, having worked in science all my life. I’m not even opposed to “transhumanism”, which I don’t think is inherently and necessarily BAD. The idea of expanding my memory without putting Google or Facebook or anybody else in charge of it? Talk to me. I’m listening.

I’ve ALWAYS gotten the flu vaccine – ALWAYS. I NEVER miss it. That’s not exactly transhumanism, but it shows that, for most of my life, I had great TRUST in medical science. In fact, I would even say I still do. Generally speaking.

I’ve had vaccines for everything I could get – even the RABIES vaccine, when I was bitten by a bat. The rabies vaccine is, in fact, one of the STRONGEST defenses of vaccination in medical history. No vaccine opponent WILL or SHOULD turn down the rabies vaccine – it is a HUGE success story in medicine. If you get bitten by a rabid animal, the rabies vaccine promptly administered against that SLOW virus will SAVE YOUR LIFE. Some vaccines are of arguable worth, but the rabies vaccine is not one of them.

Indeed, I consider myself to be something of a gourmet, or at the very least a connoisseur of vaccines. Previous “reviews” of vaccines on this site have featured my lovely assistant, Miss Direction, née Retroculture, who helps me convince people that vaccines weren’t always questionable, and might even be good for people.

Wolf’s Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and ANTI-VAX at the same time. I mean, what’s the use of FREE SPEECH if we can’t use it to troll EVERYBODY – including PENCILNECK? Whoops – WRONG PENCILNECK. Let’s try …

Wolf’s Chill Second Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Perhaps you recall my PREVIOUS correspondence and “review” of the new, two-shot shingles vaccine, Shingrix – or more specifically, my review of the FIRST SHOT. Wolf’s Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and …

I was anticipating getting one of the new coronavirus vaccines – and was holding out for the first one PROVEN to be safe for recoverees from COVID-19, one of whom I happen to be.

My lungs aren’t that good anymore – not after COVID-19 seared them like some kind of biological chlorine gassing on the front lines in France. I have to be very careful. Another case of COVID, or pulmonary / vascular coronavirus vaccine side effects of comparable severity, might actually “finish me off”.

So – I’m SHOPPING. And I mean SMART SHOPPING. I’ve been paying a LOT of attention to the new vaccines, and trying to understand their technologies, their benefits, their risks, and the science behind them. I simply can’t afford to make a mistake on side effects. Not if I want to enjoy the retirement for which I worked LONG and HARD.

I already knew quite a bit of the science behind COVID and the new vaccines – enough that it has been easy for me to follow the scientific news about these things. I’m not a virologist, an epidemiologist, a vaccine expert, or a molecular biologist, but I’ve worked with such people for much of my life. I picked up a few key ideas in the process. I’ve also come up with a few scientific ideas and principles of my own, but that is largely because I’m a devotee of the history of science, which gives perspective on science.

If you don’t think science can be WRONG, and that large numbers – HERDS – of scientists therein, can go OVER A CLIFF, just take a look at Planet Vulcan, Lysenkoism, The Great Leap Forward, and science in the Third Reich – a seminar on the latter having been quite instructive in my youth. It was not simple how the scientific masses in Germany were led astray, once socialist politics DRAGGED, PUSHED, and SCARED them away from “Jewish Science”. The top echelons of German science, filled with Jews and their friends and spouses, were forced into horrible choices, as some of the best science and scientists were politically rejected over a real social stupidity which fractured and destroyed what was arguably the leading scientific nation on the planet.

None of that had to happen – but it did.

Don’t think we’re immune from scientific debacle. We’re not. Socialism is the greatest “hold my beer” knucklehead that science ever green-lighted into a dysfunctional relationship. He’s always coming back on Saturday night with roses and cherry vodka, after the “last” last time he wrecked Science’s cute little sports car.

Science normally checks itself for errors – and it is my contention that the checking needs to be extensive – all the way out to society as a whole – including stakeholder scientists, non-stakeholder scientists, and even the non-scientific public at large. Sure, you can skip the non-stakeholders and the public, but is it wise? Hardly, in my opinion. The smaller the group needing to be fooled, the easier it is to accomplish things which society simply does not want, or which have vast intended or unintended consequences.

Yuri Geller proved that scientists are easy to fool. James Randi made that point even more strongly. And I have my own take on it, which adds pushy and manipulative politics of any kind as a RISK to science. The same “sale by urgency” which works for salesmen at the appliance store, works in science. Many of us – particularly those of us with historical perspective – saw this problem in climate science. Now, we see it in COVID and vaccines. We are being rushed into something, for some reason. The questions are WHAT and WHY.

I’m going to assume that most people reading this, have started to grasp enough of the basics of viruses and vaccines, and particularly the new mRNA and DNA vaccines, that they don’t need “the way things are supposed to work” explained to them. Indeed, if you go out, and absorb all the “mainstream” journalism on COVID – science sites – mainstream media – cable networks – your favorite non-conspiratorial “science guys” – fact checkers – explaining the way things are SUPPOSED TO WORK, you will be thoroughly and smartly educated by excellent science.

If you want, try this great link courtesy of Ethical Skeptic, one of my favorite “dissident scientists” out there, pulling us back from the current “woke Lysenkoism” we seem to be in.

Good summary of the unique structure of the Spike Protein mRNA vaccine and how it differs from the Coronavirus' Spike Protein RNA in pseudouridylyl Ψ and synonymous codon stealth.

No, our body does not 'process these mRNA sequences all the time'.https://t.co/5jTGtG3CTT
— Ethical Skeptic (@EthicalSkeptic) April 8, 2021

See? Yeah, I’m a grade-A conspiracy theorist, because I told you to look at Snopes, and not some clickbait site saying these vaccines are injecting nanobots into you to turn you into something non-human.

The PROBLEM with the conspiracy theories on vaccination isn’t so much DIRECTION as it is MAGNITUDE. It’s all over-reach. Silly, perhaps well-intended, but self-discrediting overreach. Much of it is clickbait or psy-op. A lot of it is actually true – at some small level – often orders of magnitude less dramatic than the headline claims. I can talk to the consumers of such in terms they will understand, and I’m generally talking them DOWN and BACK to what are more scientifically grounded problems with the new vaccines. And there are some. Which is the POINT of this entire piece.

In this essay, I am now talking primarily to what might be called “vaccination normies”, who are – like me – normally rather trusting of vaccines, but perhaps feel like there’s something not quite right about the current situation. These are people who have SOME vaccine hesitancy, but are likewise leery of TRULY baseless skepticism of science.

I’m talking about the people who put “SCIENCE IS REAL” yard signs out in front of their houses. There is a side of me that likes that. However, there is a side of me that wants to put out a sign that drops LOVE IS LOVE (Pedo? No way!) and all the rest, and sticks to what I know about science from the inside:

SCIENCE IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC FRAUD IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC GREED IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC BIAS IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC ERROR IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC DECEPTION IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC SELF-DECEPTION IS REAL
SCIENCE IS REALLY MESSED UP
SCIENCE IS STILL BEAUTIFUL

You see what I’m sayin’? You want SCIENCE, you get the whole, lovely, crazy, smart, dumb, dysfunctional bimbo who thinks she can handle SOCIALISM, and ends up on some frat party lawn in a lab coat and a mini-skirt, throwing her shoes at strangers, demanding somebody take her home, and SHE’S NOT DRUNK.

Yeah. I knew that crazy, wonderful bitch.

Wolf’s Take on Coronavirus Vaccines

You can check out my posting history here to follow the chronology of my thinking on coronavirus vaccines, but I’ll try to recap toward my current thinking, and what seems to be wrong with them. I am going to lead you up to my last post on the vaccines, where I almost saw what I’m seeing now, plus a whole bunch of other stuff.

That post:

Branch Covidians – Seven Ways To See Through The Phony Pharmageddon of COVID-19

PREFACE I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT. The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – …

The first news that really grabbed me was about Inovio – a DNA vaccine – a “Bill Gates” vaccine (almost all are, TBH) – and thus one of what I will refer to as genetic vaccines. Such vaccines are not supposed to work by modifying one’s genes or genome, despite the word genetic. They simply exploit cellular biochemical processes CLOSER to the genes, using the known biology of genetic expression. They dump DNA or messenger RNA (or a close facsimile thereof, to be more precise) into existing cellular processes, to “fool” the processes into creating – in the case of the current coronavirus vaccines – a stabilized form of the spike protein of the virus.

At the time, I noticed that these would be THE FIRST genetic vaccines being tested in or deployed successfully in humans. And this is where things get “iffy”. Just a little bit.

The next vaccine to get into the news in a big way was Moderna – an mRNA vaccine, again using a full and slightly stabilized spike protein as the antigen, but created in vivo via the mRNA genetic instructions thereof. While Moderna seemed to be successful in its first clinical trials, the side effects were noteworthy, frequent, and fairly significant – even compared to the notoriously “spicy”, arm-reddening-and-bicep-swelling, shingles vaccine, Shingrix. As one respected “pro-vax” scientist of my old acquaintance put it, they would have to kill him to give him the Moderna vaccine. He was definitely thinking the same thing I was thinking. Rush job, problems, keep looking.

My initial hopes quickly moved toward Novavax. Novavax is NOT an mRNA or DNA vaccine. It uses the same full stabilized spike protein strategy as the others, but it provides the spike protein AS spike protein, using a nifty little nanochemical “pincushion” to hold the spikes in an outwardly facing array, thus to engage receptors properly and at LOW DOSAGE. This is an excellent strategy that AVOIDS the unknowns of mRNA vaccines like Moderna, or DNA vaccines like Inovio or Russia’s Sputnik V.

The most significant risks of spike protein vaccines like Novavax are the risks of the spike protein itself, NOT of abusing the genetic processes to CREATE the spike protein in vivo, like Moderna. Indeed, Moderna scientists admitted in one of their first papers on their vaccine, that there ARE unknown potentials for long-term side effects with mRNA vaccines. Go find the paper – it’s there. They couch the admission in gentle and somewhat obscuring language, but the disclaimer is there. It has to be. They’re being honest.

mRNA vaccines in animals have not been uniformly free of side effects, to put it VERY kindly. We can argue about the severity of those side effects, and whether they extrapolate to humans, but I suppose we will find out now. The risks are there, and they tend to be long-term. So – in full disclosure – there are RISKS to mRNA vaccines. The older you are, the less the long-term risks matter, and conveniently, the higher the risks of COVID-19 itself. That’s a good thing. It means we only have to take the risks with those patients who can most likely afford them.

On the flip side, why the hell we want to take huge, unnecessary risks to vaccinate children is beyond me, but I’ll save those arguments for another essay. Or look at my LAST essay. Those arguments are, in part, subtle “history of vaccination” propositions that would bog us down right now.

In contrast, Novavax doesn’t take those risks. It’s a more conservative vaccine. This is why it jumped to the top of my list. An entire class of risks – the genetic processing ones – were automatically removed. As a “nothing can go wrong or I’m likely DEAD” vaccine recipient, I appreciated my better chances with Novavax.

BUT as a “real” scientist, I am not just swayed by THEORY – I love the results of EXPERIMENT. Thus, when Pfizer’s clinical trial results came out, I was IMPRESSED by the excellent antibody levels and the almost minimal side-effects. Far from being an arm-burner like Moderna, Pfizer was looking to be much milder on short-term side-effects, with stronger adverse effects being downright RARE. The large population of test subjects also implied that a recoveree LIKE ME was likely in the study by accident – and NO deaths or severe reactions occurred – definitely a GOOD SIGN for my case.

This not only bode well for lower likelihood of some kind of lethal short-term reaction due to my recoveree status – the smart scientific position would be that lower short-term risk very likely reflects lower long-term risk – and this supposition is completely absent ANY “knowing” causative reason to connect them.

Thus, Novavax and Pfizer were at the top of my list. Things were looking GOOD to take a vaccine, even if I didn’t get an explicit study on safety in recoverees.

And THEN reality started to hit.

Yes – when millions of doses of a vaccine go out, there are going to be deaths and injuries. We have a system in place – let’s be honest – which tries to HIDE the minority reports on vaccine adverse events, in order to keep buy-in on vaccine compliance. That doesn’t mean people should stop getting vaccines, any more than reports on horrible vehicle accidents OR the “hiding” of such accidents on the back pages of newspapers, mean that we should stop driving.

Nevertheless, my scientific curiosity was piqued. We DO have COVID vaccine problems now, and MORE than seemed to have been revealed by the vaccine trials.

WHY NOT DO SOMETHING ABOUT THEM?

I repeat. Differently. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH BETTER VACCINES.

Taking stock of the many positives and negatives associated with THREE VACCINES which gained the most initial experience – Moderna, Pfizer, and Oxford/AstraZeneca – I noted three things, one from each.

Moderna – side effects sometimes REMARKABLY resembled COVID-19 itself – even up to SEVERITY.

Pfizer – nursing home patients were testing positive AFTER vaccination – some dying of COVID symptoms

AstraZeneca – hematological problems reminded me of another protein hemotoxin – snake venoms

I could go into deep details about these observations, but in TWO of the cases, it was VIDEOS where the “light-bulb” finally went on. So let’s look at some videos.

Moderna: Ben Stein’s vaccination experience

As I was listening to Ben, I was stunned. He was describing COVID-19 – at least from my perspective. This was not coincidence – this was SPIKE PROTEIN.

WHOA, NELLY!!!

Note that Ben is still “pro-vax” here – he’s just CAUTIONING people about REALITY.

Pfizer: Nursing Home CNA describes correlation of vaccination to later positive diagnosis and death

This man, a CNA in a nursing home, reported online what he had observed, amidst great personal anguish about “whistle-blowing”. He observed that he had protected his elderly patients for all of 2020, but when they finally got the Pfizer vaccine, many of them just started “testing positive” and DYING. He was NOT buying the management line that there was a super-spreader – if you listen to him, he’s fully contemptuous of the idea. He was CERTAIN it was the vaccine.

I agreed with this guy – a TRUSTED SCIENTIFIC REPORTER, in my opinion. His GUT was telling him that the chronology was one of correlation. He was very likely seeing in his mind a pattern in a delay over TIME, integrated over cases, that could only be explained by the vaccine itself. He was NOT accepting the management excuse of a “super-spreader” fortuitously infecting the vaccinated, to give that same result. THIS GUY is my kind of scientist. SKEPTICAL of ad hoc, contrived, politically correct explanations that don’t explain all the facts and observations in a clean, natural fashion.

AstraZeneca: Rare but serious clotting reactions are enough to evoke CONCERN from medical professionals

I think THESE DOCTORS in the following video represent my position extremely well – the problems with the AstraZeneca vaccine are RARE, but we KNOW there is a correlation, and it is our DUTY to stop and fix the problems, weighing in particular the relatively lower risks of COVID-19 itself in younger patients, where these events are occurring.

The difference between IGNORING the rare thrombocytopenia incidences and FIGURING THEM OUT is the difference between Stalinism and responsible popular government.

I truly admire these front line doctors for their SCIENTIFIC BALANCE. Frankly, I consider front line doctors to be scientists of the highest order, just like that CNA in the video above. PRACTICE is what matters – not DEGREES.

Now in this latter case, the AstraZeneca vaccine, I dragged in what I consider a very useful analogy to hemotoxic snake venoms, but I didn’t really see WHY this would be happening – until I found something that explains ALL of these problems.

I just didn’t realize I was holding an ACE.

The Macguffin – Reverse Transcription

In March of 2021, I reacquainted myself with a paper that I had noted when it came out, in December of 2020, but had not fully grasped the significance. The authors clearly knew that what they had found was a big deal, and worded the title appropriately, but even then, I don’t think they dared consider the possible deeper significance of their finding.

Nobody can FIRE ME from retirement, so I’m quite willing to say what needs to be said. Could it be wrong? Maybe. But if it’s RIGHT, there are issues that need to be dealt with. So let’s go there.

LINK: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1.full

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/XWC52

New Results Comments (42)

SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome

Liguo Zhang, Alexsia Richards, Andrew Khalil, Emile Wogram, Haiting Ma, Richard A. Young, Rudolf Jaenisch
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516

I will refer to this paper at “the Jaenisch paper” – after the main author to whom correspondence is written – not because I don’t want to credit the fortunate and likely excellent first co-author Zhang in this instance, but because there is another paper I talk about all the time, dealing with masks, that I call “the Zhang paper“.

THAT one – the mask paper – in an embarrassingly good journal – is a piece of crap – some of the worst “political science” ever – designed to virtue signal to the CCP-DNC narrative of election-fraud-assisting masks, in utter contradiction to the very data presented by the authors.

The Jaenisch paper, in contrast, opens up a barn door that I am sure both industry and “in bed” government wants closed, Closed, CLOSED.

Stated very bluntly, the paper says that the virus behind COVID-19 actually “changes the genome” of victims – similarly to, though not exactly like, HIV.

You know – that OTHER disease for which Fauci was so interested in creating a vaccine.

And not only that – the COVID-19 virus does it enough to throw off those damn PCR tests that Kary Mullis warned us about for the exact same reason. In fact, the solution of that aspect of testing – the way “test-triggering fragments” just hung on and on and on in recoverees – is one of the BEAUTIES of the Jaenisch paper. The conclusions of the paper explain very neatly certain OBSERVATIONS and scientific conundrums that were first found by Korean scientists, who were very very persistent in proving that their COVID patients were NOT getting reinfected, as the fear-mongering American media “wanted”, but were still testing POSITIVE while being NON-INFECTIOUS.

Now we have a wonderful explanation. Excellent scientific work. THIS is why I signed up for science!

The THREE-TRILLION DOLLAR QUESTION that nobody wants to ask, however, is whether the genetic vaccines based on mRNA or DNA of the viral spike protein do the same thing – meaning get incorporated into the genomes of recipients. Well, do they?

Ever? Sometimes? Always? Or even just enough to make a difference?

It’s a great question! That deserves a CLOSE LOOK with MUCH SIDE-EYE.

I will say this. Even if these vaccines only get incorporated sometimes, that would make the “crazy people” yelling “OMG THESE CORONAVIRUS VACCINES ARE GENETIC MODIFICATION!” become suddenly – oddly – scandalously – CORRECT.

I find that incredibly ironic.

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR. And then, there is EVEN MOAR STILL.

The Spike Must Flow

I had set the Jaenish paper aside in my mind in January 2021, as I was busy being pursued by the FBI as an “insurrectionist”, having wanted to see “fellow dissident scientist” Dr. Simone Gold speak at the Capitol Building on January 6, 2021. Rather luckily, I never found her, or realized where she was. Had I found her, I would have likely been arrested and all that nonsense, since she wandered, far too trustingly, into the interior of the Capitol building.

This old wolf, too wary to go into buildings – too old to play tug-of-war games – too injured to stand up to direct pepper spray – settled for singing the Star Spangled Banner at over 100 decibels with tens of thousands of patriots outside – which was an absolutely surreal experience.

But back to the story.

When I began seeing more and more vaccine problems by March of 2021, some of the possible answers seemed to point to the WHOLE SPIKE PROTEIN being the BAD ACTOR. The trouble was, I needed disease-producing levels of it. How might THAT be happening?

Look at Ben Stein. He was injected with only a small amount of COVID spike protein mRNA, but had disease like I did, when, in my case, the virus ran wild making BOTH spike protein AND more virus from it, in my cells.

The vaccine does NOT create any new virus. It does NOT have the full virus instructions. JUST the main one – the spike protein that provides a significant part of the viral shell.

Thus, the vaccine cannot create an EXPONENTIAL GROWTH of the spike protein, which the VIRUS does. The full virus creates more and more virus, meaning more and more spike protein, until something – immune response – shuts it all down.

The vaccine creates a few “fountains” of spike protein – basically “vaccine-infected” cells – but these get shut down as immunity builds. It never really gets out of control. Or at least, not normally.

So, for Ben Stein to have a powerful, disease-like experience, he needs cells that are cranking out far more spike protein than we would normally expect with the vaccine.

Well, if the INSTRUCTIONS for spike protein – in some people – got a bit upstream of just “slipping them into the print shop queue”, to where entire new print queues of spike protein and substantial, chimeric, problematic chunks thereof were being repeatedly ordered from DNA central operations, it would explain a whole lotta spike protein and associated chimeric junk being produced – more than anticipated.

And – I think I would be remiss if I didn’t consider the possibility that some of these bogus DNA instructions might be hard to shut down completely, thus providing an explanation of “long haulers” and “immunocompromised variant generators” beyond their known suffering of what can be rightly regarded as “simply” chronic damage from initial infection.

But let’s move on the to Pfizer nursing home case, and many other reported cases like it.

If we’re getting genetic incorporation of vaccine spike protein instructions at the DNA level by reverse transcription, like the Jaenish paper, perhaps in older individuals who are more susceptible to this problem, then it explains them testing positive later – and in some cases – if they can’t shut it off – DYING LATER.

Now – here is where KINETICS comes in. Kinetics is basically process flow rates. I talked about KINETICS in my LAST RANT on COVID-19, in which I began to put all this stuff together, but didn’t really put forth the totality of things until the comments section at the end of the post. I mentioned in the body of the post that the kinetics of viral interference didn’t seem to explain the nearly complete disappearance of flu while COVID was still significantly above herd immunity levels. It just felt to me that BOTH of these would shut down with greater similarity, if viral interference was the sole explanation. In that case, CDC lying to us about flu vaccine efficacy, understating the success to increase compliance, COMBINED with viral interference, provides a nicer (IMO) explanation of the observed kinetics.

Now, in the case of partial genetic incorporation, the kinetics of interest would be how fast the body shuts down spike protein production by cells without genetic incorporation, versus shutting down cells where there WAS genetic incorporation. If cells with significant production of spike protein due to genetic incorporation were not just sources of more spike protein and more symptoms, but also harder to shut down than “unincorporated” cells, and elderly people were increasingly subject to genetic incorporation with age, we might actually see the AGE-VACCINE DANGER relationship that is being seen in nursing homes, where the most elderly patients are at significantly greater and AGE-INCREASING risk from the mRNA vaccines – something we absolutely don’t want.

Are you starting to see why this explanation works for me?

Genetic incorporation of symptom-producing protein instructions by mRNA vaccines of the FULL SPIKE PROTEIN seems like a REAL WORKHORSE OF AN EXPLANATION.

And, if you’re following my reasoning, you can see that this can also explain the odd cases of thrombocytopenia in some younger patients getting the AstraZeneca vaccine.

In the AstraZeneca case, we would be seeing rare cases where spike protein production after genetic incorporation was just cranking away at levels reminiscent of hemotoxic envenomation by crotalids – or in English, snakebite, which is also (in certain snakes with certain proteins) characterized by thrombocytopenia.

I will tell you right now – there MAY be very similar cases in older patients – maybe not – but I suspect that such cases are less “systemically identifiable” in older patients where thrombosis is more “normal”, and will be more likely attributed to age and NOT the vaccine.

And here is the kicker. In all of these cases, because of the chimeric nature of the fragments noted in the Jaenisch paper, there is a certain RANDOMNESS which could be responsible for the random responses seen in different individuals and different vaccines, which by using significantly different mRNA vectors, may result in significantly different levels and exact circumstances of genetic incorporation in different individuals.

NOW – if it turns out that there IS genetic incorporation of vaccine-origin stabilized spike protein mRNA or DNA as genomic DNA, like the virus itself, then one of the first suspects for reverse transcriptase activity or induction thereof, would be the spike protein itself.

And THAT, my friends, opens up a REAL can of worms.

The Full Spike Protein Monty

Let me ask a really impertinent but really obvious question – something that Tucker Carlson is famous for.

Why are we vaccinating people with the WHOLE spike protein, or more precisely, stabilized analogs thereof?

OK – now I’m being a LAWYER here. I am asking questions to which I ALREADY know the answers, and in particular, the answers that Tony Fauci might give. Here is my argument on behalf of Fauci.

“We don’t really know EXACTLY where on the spike protein, might be the BEST place for antibodies to attack. Also, we don’t really have time to start guessing, when we can just use the whole thing. Most of the labs are modelling the whole molecule, and sharing data. It just makes sense that everybody sticks to the same model, so that any advances that one lab makes, can be quickly adopted by the other labs and researchers. If we begin using fragments of the spike protein, then results are going to be harder to interpret from lab to lab. There will be fragmentation of the science as well, and this will slow our response time tremendously. Comparison of results will be much more difficult. The timeline to a vaccine could be extended by months – even years. Maybe never……..”

See how that works? I would make a fantastic lying science bureaucrat – I know all the tricks already, because I used to negotiate compromises that result in the status quo in fake science in other ways.

Now – HERE is the superior counterargument that will LOSE because Tony Fauci is in control. For this argument, I’m a FRONT-LINE DOCTOR. Maybe I’m even Simone Gold, or one of the various doctors I followed back during the HCQ Wars.

“Yes, that’s all fine and good. But we are doctors, administering a VACCINE to patients. Adverse effects are real, and we want to minimize them. The spike protein is almost certainly the cause of much of the endothelial damage by this virus. Anything we can do to avert that damage is smart, including NOT using the full spike protein or analogs thereof. If we know the primary sites that antibodies need to attack, which we actually do, we can just use shorter peptide sequences or protein fragments constituting those sites. Modeling can make sure these fragments present the same, active, pre-fusion conformation. We can stabilize as needed to prevent immune enhancement, just like in the full spike protein. This shorter peptide approach has been successful in hepatitis vaccines. These peptides can be created quickly and formulated as vaccines in roughly the same time as the full protein. In fact, vaccine expert Winfried Stoecker has already done this, using the receptor binding domain of the spike protein, and creating a short peptide based on it. Since this technology is well-known, we don’t have to take any of the risks of messenger RNA or DNA technology. Nor do we have to use adenoviral vectors or new lipid nanodroplet technologies. Likewise, all of the advances in stabilizing pre-fusion conformation in the full spike protein can be used for the RBD peptide, so the risks of immune enhancement will be just as low. So, unless you can give us a reason to stick with the toxic spike protein, I’d say this is a no brainer.”

At least, that’s the way it looks to me.

Now, here are some interesting facts.

First, EVERYBODY is doing the full spike protein. The ONLY party that made a vaccine using less, was Prof. Stoecker, and he got in trouble for it, with the German government, because he wasn’t properly authorized, even though – well – normally he just does vaccine work and that’s that.

RBD_Regional_Antigenic_Vaccine_quadrupol-Mutante-3.png

Second, you should note that – IF the spike protein has any reverse transcriptase (RT) activity, that activity would likely have been LOST by switching to a small peptide dropping most of the molecule.

Third, you should note that – by switching to a small peptide, there is no mRNA or DNA corresponding TO that peptide, so there is no chance it will be genetically incorporated.

By now, it is VERY clear to me, that the industry picked the vaccine technologies that it did, precisely because they were modern and untested, and they needed an “emergency” to get these technologies into use, in preparation for their big goal – actual gene therapy. But – AND LOGIC here – that does not preclude there being even MORE motivation here. The more I see this “event”, the more I see everybody getting bought in by SOME new aspect of the scam.

Using a more conservative approach would have been SAFER, but it would not have advanced the technologies that were groomed to be advanced. Even the Novavax protein-based vaccine, fairly conservative, tests the novel use of nanoparticles to assemble the pseudo-spike proteins into cell-infective starburst patterns. It, too, is full spike protein.

But again, THIS. Everybody is ALL about the full spike protein.

Let’s ask WHY.

A Feature – Not a Bug

Now – if the Jaenisch work is good – and I think it is – and if genetic incorporation of vaccine mRNA into genomic DNA also occurs – and I strongly suspect it does – and if the spike protein itself is responsible to at least SOME degree in causing genetic incorporation – which I also think is very likely – then I am of the opinion that Fauci knew exactly what he was doing in pushing mRNA and DNA vaccines that code for the full spike protein, and that he did so as a sneaky way to get a reverse transcription promoter into the human genome.

Why? I don’t really know. Not yet. But this whole thing just seems intentional in its ELEGANCE.

This is easily expressed in logical hacking terms. Fauci uploaded a stealthy FTP uploading tool into humanity’s genetic account. FIRST as a problem, with China’s help. THAN as a solution, with the industry’s help.

The idea of “uploading an uploader surreptitiously” is just elegant. It’s HACKING. Any person who ever had to “learn to code” has to admire it. And it’s doubly elegant by doing it TWICE.

Stated in biological terms:

Create a genetic vaccine for a same-same disease, both containing the genetic sequence of a reverse-transcription promoter, such as a reverse transcriptase, as a way of creating a persistent or at least consistently available presence of a reverse transcription activator in humans.

And the beauty of this scam, is that it’s “WHOOPS” played TWICE. VIRUS, then VACCINE.

Let’s enjoy it! Scenic route…….

FIRST the disease – OH, NO, LOOK WHAT BAT SOUP DID!

The ChiComs are masters of psychology on Americans. First they whip up the cultural WTF.

THEN they whip up the OTHER side of Americans saying “don’t hate on Asian cultural differences!”

THEN they pull the whole offering back, with everybody left high and dry on CCP zoonotic transfer garbage narratives, minus “bat soup”, but including pangolin “look squirrels”, when the REALITY is that humanized animal models are almost all that is actually used for this kind of viral research any more (thanks to Mary Morse for this fantastic point).

Wuhan lab. Put ALL your chips on it.

MASTERFUL MANIPULATION, and many American academic scientists fell for it like soldiers on leave in a brothel district.

THEN the cure – the vaccine – which uses the SAME genetics to get MOAR of the uploader installed in MOAR people.

And if they get caught….”OMG, DID WE DO THAT? WE JUST FOLLOWED THE SCIENCE AND THE DISEASE! FULL SPIKE PROTEIN FOR THE WIN! IT’S *** SCIENCE *** !!!”

This is masterful scammery, IMO.

https://youtu.be/Oza1j2_WqBk

Maybe even more than Kary Mullis realized.

Rand Paul Nails Fauci and Cuts to the Chase on Coronavirus Variants – Are the Vaccinated and Recovered Even Getting Reinfected or Sick?

Introduction You have GOT to see the video I’m going to show you. It’s not just what they’re talking about. It’s WHERE IT LEADS. Most of the people who watch Rand Paul go after Fauci here, are concentrating on MASKS, because that is the TOP LAYER of the argument. But THAT is the small potatoes. …

Something is going on here, and it seems too purposeful to be mere incompetence.

SO – Does Wolf Take the Faucipox Vaccine?

Now – I’m gonna tell you – CRISPR-Cas9 vaccines are coming, and THOSE are straight-up genetic engineering. Save some ammunition for that fight. But right now, I think it’s worth bringing up some PRETTY TOUGH QUESTIONS about the current vaccines.

Simply stated – aren’t things with reverse transcription activity a RISK, like HIV, and why would we court that risk in a SOLUTION like a vaccine?

And what’s with all the LIES to keep people from noticing that the VACCINE causes positive tests in recipients, “because spike protein, sequences, PCR, and [COUGH] maybe a little incorporation”.

C’mon. This is so obvious now, it’s PAINFUL. CDC is not even looking foolish. They know this stuff isn’t the disease – it’s the vaccines. They’re LYING.

Sheesh. The whole thing is an outrage.

So. Am I going to take one of the current vaccines?

Not if I think there is a reverse transcription activator coded for in the mRNA or DNA, or even if it’s just in there as PROTEIN.

I’m quite good with my natural immunity, which sadly may ALREADY include some uploading of the uploader. I have no idea if I have any genetic incorporation from the virus already, but if I do, I know exactly where any future positive PCR test is coming from.

Anyway, thank you, Kary. You were right all along. They ABUSED your work.

W

Dear KMAG: 20201030 Open Topic / Watch The Water / Fake News Drain-Circling Psychosis / Why I'm Shilling Novavax / Calling All Prayer Warriors

Free speech, yada, yada, yada. But don’t give Komrade Kamala any excuses to shut us down. This has been addressed elsewhere. Such as HERE:

TERMS OF SERVICE: https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/01/01/dear-maga-open-topic-20190101/

YOU KNOW THE DRILL.

Give them nothing but one more day to rue, and the wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Remain CIVIL and possibly even GENTEEL.

Today we have FOUR SHORT LESSONS in politically incorrect WOLFTHINK.

Watch The Water

One of the beautiful things that the Q team did, as part of not only its “comms”, but also its psy-opping, and its deniability, was to communicate to us in double, triple, and higher entendres. It was poetry, which not only made it CUNNING, but also ATTRACTIVE, INSPIRING, and even BEAUTIFUL.

Sure, SOME people will “read things in” wrongly, or too little, or too much, but overall, SOME will figure out TRUE THINGS, and what they figure out will spread.

The GENIUS of the COMMS is a proof unto itself.

I cannot tell you if Q originally intended for us to “get” WATER ISLAND as a sly tip in “WATCH THE WATER”, but OMG – it’s a GOLD MINE, intended or not.

Thanks to ValCur, who is NOT ValJar, I researched a photo and was led to THIS ARTICLE:

I simply CANNOT recommend this article highly enough.

LINK: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/28/james-biden-lobbyist-virgin-islands-099318

This is real corruption, and the article both explains it, and EXCUSES IT.

This article is trying to IMMUNIZE Biden against damage from not just this story, but also the deeper parts of the scandal, by PRESENTING and CONTROLLING one of the lesser parts. You can read the “excusing of corruption” at every step. It’s intentionally demoralizing – like – “yeah, he will get away with it, because, well, lookie here, this might just be innocent because of THIS.”

Likewise, there is NO mention of Jeffrey Epstein ANYWHERE in the article. And yet, Water Island is SO CLOSE to Epstein Island, and so convenient for traffic to it, utterly unobserved, that it really makes one think Politico is deliberately walling off Epstein by poking up a smaller scandal in the way and saying “nothing to see here – why don’t you just GO HOME?”

Here is how to locate Water Island on the map above.

Epstein Island is located at the circular location marker up and to the left (NW) of the added text. That marker is RIGHT ON Little St. James, a.k.a. Epstein Island. There is another, adjacent, island of similar but slightly larger size, just up and to the left (NW) of that – this is Great St. James. Epstein also bought THAT island – SECRETLY – the story is NASTY and INTRIGUING, and is described HERE:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Saint_James,_U.S._Virgin_Islands

Great St. James is off the shore of the BIGGER island to the left, St. Thomas. The capitol city in the center is Charlotte Amalie, clearly labeled in the map. Just below and slightly to the left (SSW) of the label for Charlotte Amalie, and really almost part of the city, is Water Island – unlabeled in the map above.

In this map of St. Thomas and surrounding smaller islands, you can clearly see both Water Island in the center, and Epstein’s two islands in the lower right corner, unlabeled, southeast of the hamlet of Red Hook. Hassel Island, next to Water Island, is mostly uninhabited, and serves as an historical park.

Water Island is a bit like a gated community, although it’s not all that ritzy. I will include a link to a HUGE, high-resolution image of it. Here is a smaller image:

Here is the BIG IMAGE from another angle: Big Aerial Image of Hassel and Water Islands

NOW – if you are wondering about how to get from Water Island to Epstein Island, then you may want to get distracted by discrediting theories of submarines, based on the fascinating history of submarines on St. Thomas, and military activities on both St. Thomas and Water Island. However, to be quite frank, it’s just easier to hop on a boat. As you can see in the above picture, boats are everywhere, and there is so much boat traffic, it’s quite easy to lose track of any one boat, let alone any one passenger.

NOW – here is the interesting point from the article. It’s how the Bidens were basically GIVEN a nice parcel of land on Water Island by a lobbyist friend.

The Bidens bought a desirable plot of land.
The Bidens split the land into three subplots.
The Bidens then SOLD one subplot to the lobbyist for the FULL PRICE of the FULL PLOT.
This left the Bidens with over 2/3 of the land FOR FREE – GRATIS – by being OVERPAID for part of it.
The Bidens then secured LOAN MONEY from the lobbyist using the other two plots as collateral.

Now, if that’s confusing, it’s supposed to be. It’s money laundering. What the lobbyist did was give the Bidens PROPERTY, and then let them CASH IN on it with loans.

Say, didn’t the Bidens get money from the Chinese that way, too? Some of it as cash – some of it as LOANS?

Whatever. It’s all very ugly.

Now, the REAL question is whether Hunter Biden was ever on Epstein Island.

I think we’re about to find out.

Get your popcorn now.

And now for a scandal closer to home.

OMG! A LIBTARD POSTED ON THE Q TREE!

Fake News Drain-Circling Psychosis

We got one comment in MODERATION which – well – this person is, shall we say, not a good fit for this site. She is welcome to visit our Gab Group where people can individually “turn her off”, but since we can’t do it here, she did NOT survive “Wolf’s Extreme Vetting“.

This is a MAGA site. If you take BASIC ISSUE with our purpose, you’re probably going to disrupt our day-to-day purpose, which is to support TRUMP. Can’t have that.

However, I think it’s worthwhile to consider what she had to say, so here it is.

House of Heart 9 hours ago · houseofheartweb.wordpress.com

20201012: Amy Coney Barrett Confirmation Hearing For SCOTUS

All of these folks need to watch the real news and stop the brainwash they are getting from Fox. Amy Barrett will go down as the the SCJ selected by an impeached president in an effort to get himself re-elected so that he can’t be criminally charged for his wrong doings . He couldn’t care less about abortion , our healthcare or whether we live or die. His lack of action to mitigate Covid 19 has made that quite clear. He. did stack the court with far right conservatives in his plan to deprive us of a legitimate vote to rid us if this non-patriot when he refuses to concede and takes away our right to choose a president by putting the decision before the stacked far right Supreme Court that he has weaponized. Save our democracy, despite your hatred of Obama, save our democracy. Wake up , America can’t take four more years of the criminality of the Trump family.

This is, I’m fairly certain, the mentality of people who are still voting for Joe Biden. Now, first of all, many of us here don’t even watch Fox News, since it’s basically the OUTER LIMITS of establishment “allowed” thinking. Sure, there are some great journalists there, like Tucker Carlson, but then again, those are exactly the “far right” personalities that this poster surely rejects.

But as for “real news” – HEY BABY – that is US.

The news – the real news – is something we have to ferret out, past all the lies.

While I’m not going to respond to all of the specific “accusations against Trump” here, I think some are worth addressing.

First, I want to assure this poster (HoH, hereafter) that Amy Coney Barrett is not going to do all the bad things that she (HoH) is afraid of, although Justice Barrett will make SOME decisions which will be INCONVENIENT for Democrat POLICY and POLITICS. However, Barrett will likely UPHOLD liberal policies which are soundly rooted in law, and thus, the poster HoH will be PLEASANTLY SURPRISED on occasion. Possibly many occasions, if she’s just a deluded liberal, and not a lying leftist.

The impeached president stuff, of course, means nothing without a conviction. Bill Clinton survived impeachment, so there is nothing to score here, but I hesitate to use that comparison, because it is a FALSE SYMMETRY. Bill Clinton’s impeachment MATTERED. Trump’s impeachment was blatantly FALSE, and the work of criminals. Fake News consternation aside, Adam Schiff is in trouble for falsely accusing Trump and furthering a HOAX PROSECUTION.

Hoaxes matter. And so do SOME impeachments.

Why did Bill Clinton’s impeachment matter? It was just about SEX – right?

Yes – that is TRUE, although technically it was about LYING about sex. And THAT betrays the much deeper problem of BETRAYAL.

I am now of a belief that CHINA has targeted a particular type of politician who they believe will SELL OUT AMERICA. Bill Clinton and Joe Biden are specific examples of this kind of politician.

politically amoral or sociopathic
sexually immoral
willing to take bribes
married to a spouse PERSONALLY invested in the politician’s success
spouse will support illegalities and immoralities
pol is FAITHLESS to the spouse – betrayal is second nature
both pol and spouse do not return ANGER to blackmail or betrayal, but DEEPEN TIES instead

These are politicians who LIGHT UP China’s “Blue-Gold-Yellow” (BGY) program by giving up intelligence, taking bribes, and being faithless to spouse, God and country.

Trump has done nothing like what Bill Clinton did, even when he “dated around”, shall we say, before and between marriages.

Bill Clinton betrayed our country. He took money from China to do things not in the interests of the United States. All of Trump’s alleged “betrayals” have proven to have been manufactured LIES by people who DID get in bed with China, Russia, Ukraine or Iran.

As for Trump “not really caring” about abortion, healthcare, and OUR LIVES – sorry. Look for the big picture here to not be delusional. Just one – healthcare – Trump FORCED Republicans to accept HIS POSITION on OUR pre-existing conditions. And on COVID-19, we see that he sacrificed HIS ECONOMY to not take a chance on OUR LIVES.

Which brings us to COVID-19.

This is a good one. Trump WINS here, if you dig even slightly below the weak lies of the Biden Coupists. I could get into the deeper weeds of what is REALLY going on here – where I draw in some of the stuff that will appears momentarily in the NEXT parts of this post, but I’m setting aside those items for now.

Why? Because it turns out that viruses are vastly more complicated and subtle than we realized, and most people are not really aware of the nastier parts of the story, which “real science” ADMITS, but kinda slides over to the side of the discussion table, and gets all COUGH COUGH about the nastier parts.

Most people in this world will be SHOCKED when they understand. They will be shocked at how science SCREWED UP in how it responded to the truth about viruses, too. Firing Judy Mikovits did NOT make the complexity of the truth go away – it just delayed things.

And COVID-19 has a lot to do with that. It was a CHEAP MOVE in science, to FORCE Trump to “buy in” to a moneyed and “almost true” but irresponsible position which PROTECTS Tony Fauci.

Nope. We’re going to stick to the SLIGHTLY PHONY STORY – the “standard theory” of viruses, without the problems and the lies – we’re going to PLAY ALONG with what gets printed on the glossy pages in the check-out line – the simple story that leaves the nasty REALITY of viruses OUT, so that MONEY can be obtained through vaccines which treat the part of the story we’re allowed to see.

That is where Trump played along, too, but ACTUALLY CARED about treating people, and BOOM – we have real treatments like HCQ, Regeneron, and (bad as it is) remdesivir. We have vaccines that will work on a subset of colds, although, sadly, SOME OF THEM may cause cancers, immune disorders, and immunodeficiency as well, long term, if you take the wrong ones, and we don’t know which ones those are. It’s rough science, with some very nasty “known unknowns”.

But we’ll deal with it. Soon.

Stocks are already banking on Novavax making money due to its older technology evading concerns on mRNA and DNA, and rightly so. This despite the fact that mRNA and viral vector vaccines are running ahead in terms of trials.

STAY TUNED.

But most of all, Trump did the smart things – the obvious things – and they worked. He did NOT listen to the lies that closing borders would be ineffective. Trump closed the borders and saved lives – although CHINA lied even earlier, and got cases here in January and even December.

It’s very clear to me how our Democrat-allied medical bureaucrats, in league with China, tried to carry out a coup using a new coronavirus and a media scare. When all is revealed, there will be many firings, and convictions, too.

But not yet. We’re “Biden” our time, so to speak.

As for the rest of HoH’s comment – well – it’s mostly a very “Fake News” perspective. Fake News hates Trump, and more importantly hates people like ME, because they’re invested in decades of lies. Those lies are coming undone. WE are not the ones hiding the evidence presented by the other side.

COUGH.

houseofheartweb.wordpress.com

Help yourself. Convince us. But not here.

You will not disrupt our TRUTH-SEEKING ALTERNATIVE to the FAKE NEWS.

My mother saw the SAME THING happen to the Nazis. When the Nazi regime fell apart, like the decades-long leftist infiltration is falling apart now, or when ANY socialist regime falls apart, the TRUTH makes a certain sector of the old socialist guard just GO NUTS.

As the DRAIN IS CIRCLED, the cries get shriller, and the ear-covering gets ridiculous.

“Good Obama” – “Good Joe Biden” – “Good Fuehrer” – it’s all the same. They were PHONIES propped up by the media, and when the media falls, THEY FALL.

Trump is not propped up by the media. He SHUNNED their approval from the beginning.

ASK WHY.

There will be people – the “true believers” – who cannot FACE THE DIFFICULT TRUTHS. They won’t CALL the corruption what it is – they won’t even look at it.

The Nazis did not ALLOW discussion of the truth. They – like the communists they are SO SIMILAR TO, would DISRUPT any discussion of the truth. They would keep everything they didn’t want OUT OF THE NEWS and HIDDEN from the People. If people TALKED about it, those voices were DISRUPTED or SQUELCHED. Often BRUTALLY.

THAT is socialism, and we’re SHUTTING IT DOWN.

We WILL NOT live under it. Period.

Join Gab. My advice. Left or right. The TRUTH will come for you there. Like it or not.

I wish House of Heart well in her travels.

Vaya con Dios.

And, if you don’t believe in God, stay classy, and vaya con Dior.

Why I’m Shilling Novavax

BEGIN TL;DR /

I have recently seen or heard a variety of things (I will explain – see WHY below), which have combined to convince me that mRNA and *especially* DNA vaccines are TOO RISKY relative to the *actual* dangers of the China Virus, to be a SAFE choice for people who are NOT in a high-risk category relative to COVID-19 infection.

Now, this is just my personal stance at the moment, and it is subject to change. But right now, my opinion is as follows:

For people not at great risk of harm from the DISEASE, it pays to WAIT until the sum of ALL POSSIBLE RISKS of any particular individual vaccine, experienced over the LIKELY REMAINDER OF LIFE, falls below the known risks of the disease for that person RIGHT NOW.

This is a pure RISK / BENEFIT analysis, using both KNOWN SCIENCE and SCIENTIFIC UNKNOWNS.

This is EXACTLY in keeping with Trump’s family’s INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS on COVID-19 treatments. Trump himself took TWO experimental treatments. His wife and son, both younger, took NO experimental treatments.

If we were dealing with airborne Ebola – WHICH WE ARE NOT – then it would make sense to give most people mRNA and DNA vaccines and “hope for the best”. That is NOT THE CASE, and we need to stop pretending that it is. The “COVID hype” has FAILED, and those who continue it, need to be made to answer for it. It’s time for HONESTY.

Thus, FOR YOUR KIDS of FUTURE KIDS, and for anybody not at high risk, I recommend the Novavax vaccine as less risky for long-term development of CANCER and IMMUNE DISORDERS, both of which are foreseeable potential risks of nucleic acid vaccine biotechnologies, which risks cannot be properly tested for, in the short term, in my opinion.

On the other hand, for those in high-risk COVID groups who need vaccines NOW, and particularly the elderly, any of the vaccines that show short-term safety and efficacy are reasonable risk choices, relative to any possible but unknown long-term consequences.

/END TL;DR

BEGIN WHY /

In my opinion, the risks of mRNA and DNA vaccines are like DES was for children of women who took it – they are LONG-TERM risks, and potentially transmissible to children.

We have been GASLIT into the “need” to take new, relatively untested vaccines, and “hoping for the best”.

NO. Just NO.

In my opinion, ONLY people either (1) at high risk of DEATH from COVID-19, due to age and/or comorbidities, OR (2) those who are willing to BRAVELY VOLUNTEER, at the risk of late-in-life cancer or immune disorders, possibly even to their children, to find out if mRNA and DNA vaccines are actually SAFE long term, should take the “novel” mRNA or DNA vaccines.

It will be YEARS before we know if these technologies are either guaranteed safe or controllably safe (meaning we know how to make them safe against ALL potential gotchas).

I’m not saying that we should not make and in some cases TAKE these vaccines. I’m saying that these vaccines have KNOWN and EASILY FORESEEABLE LONG-TERM RISKS, and we are NOT being open and honest about those risks.

The Chinese are being very cautious about the new vaccine technologies, both because they are a bit behind, and because they are basically letting Americans experiment on Americans. However, the Chinese are also taking risks just by pushing primarily the very oldest-style vaccines, which are at extremely high risk of immune enhancement phenomena.

Because the Novavax vaccine is using BOTH modern technology which evades immune enhancement, AND established technology which has a proven safety record, and is NOT taking RISKS inherent to mRNA and DNA technologies, I am of the opinion that it is the most THEORETICALLY SAFE of the vaccines thus far.

I would give Novavax to my own children without worry, based on what I know now. I would only give an mRNA or DNA alternative to an OLDER RELATIVE or one with a serious comorbidity. If my parents were alive right now, both thus being VERY old with SERIOUS comorbidities, I would almost certainly advise that they get the first available vaccine, since all the front-runners appear to be headed for approval when phase 3 tests are done, IMO.

Now – let me explain my position.

Regarding viruses and vaccines, I am quite familiar with the broader topics in biology, biochemistry, pharmacology, and other relevant sciences, and even the “basics” of how viruses and vaccines work. However, I was NOT aware of the nitty-gritty of viruses and vaccines until recently, as I began to try to understand the different vaccine and therapeutic offerings which are coming in Operation Warp Speed.

I was shocked, at the beginning, to discover that the very first coronavirus vaccine mentioned in my news feed, the Inovio offering, was in fact a DNA vaccine. I had to DIG to discover that aspect. It was not even mentioned in the “top-level” Twitter-mediated links. Indeed, I had to dig just to find Bill Gates mentioned.

The details of the Inovio vaccine are quite interesting.

Digging into the OTHER vaccines in the running, I discovered that for every DNA vaccine, there were several mRNA vaccines (m = “messenger”) also in the running, and the mRNA vaccines were actually more advanced in terms of clinical trials.

The above list is the state of things in MAY, as far as vaccines in clinical trials. Now, jump to July.

Now, I could have spent a lot of time reading paywall-slipping scientific literature (very difficult for poor “people’s scientists” like me to find), trying to come to my own opinion about the safety of mRNA and DNA vaccines, but I found a faster way to “poll scientists past the fake news” – that was simply to raise the red flag on RNA and DNA vaccines, and see how fast the industry shot down my red flag. If mRNA and DNA vaccines were obviously and inherently safe, there should have been a DOGPILE of both scientists and shills to “correct” me.

Instead, there were CRICKETS.

What I did next was even more desperate. I started calling these vaccines “genetic modification” – a direct and specific accusation, which should have been SHOT DOWN HARD WITH SOUND SCIENCE if genetic incorporation of some kind was not a risk. That meme spread, and I watched what happened.

Instead of saying “GENES CANNOT BE MODIFIED BY THESE VACCINES!”, there was several kinds of weak counter-arguments, based on definitions, assertions, and ideals. Nobody ever “did the John Kasich” and said “Vaccines can’t modify your genes – that’s crazy talk!” There was dancing around the core accusation – never even an attempt at a solid rebuttal.

Now, you have to understand – I’ve gotten “that’s crazy talk” for a whole lot more obviously REAL stuff than this plausible but kinda freaky idea, that vaccines might mess with your genes. I found that VERY surprising. I know how scientists and left-wing “science is real” types love to correct other people, and most of all “errant scientists”, when they step on thin ice.

Was I actually on SOLID GROUND?

Leave it to a “Twitter Angel” to sneak up on me and drop a huge hint – “CRISPR” – in a reply. The person accused COVID-19 vaccines of INTENTIONALLY modifying our genes.

One quick search to validate, and…..

WHOA, NELLY!

It turns out that there ARE, IN FACT, VACCINES which depend on genetic modification. They use CRISPR-Cas9 technology to make gene insertions.

That headline actually HIDES the current state of research – in which WORKING VACCINES which “edit the genes of T cells” are not just someday, but RIGHT NOW, and showing desirable results.

Read the article!

LINK: https://www.statnews.com/2019/02/19/crispr-might-work-when-vaccines-fail/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/8QtlZ

HOWEVER, as far as I can tell, NONE of the current coronavirus vaccines – NONE of them – intentionally edit genes.

However, you would be shocked not only how easy that is to do – meaning EDITING your DNA – what’s even more shocking is how easily it is to do badly, and cause problems.

AS RETROVIRUSES, IN FACT, DO.

However, before I get to retroviruses, which “seal the deal” for me on making the sign of the cross at mRNA and DNA vaccines, I need to talk about TWO other things.

First, CANCER.

The October 19, 2020 issue of Molenium Magazine, a.k.a. Chemical & Engineering News, has a really great cover story, on a tumor phenomenon known somewhat generally as “circular DNA”, more commonly as “extrachromosomal DNA” (ecDNA), and also as “extrachromosomal circular DNA” (eccDNA), but be careful, because for whatever weird historical reasons, ALL of it seems to be circular, and ecDNA is regarded as a subset of eccDNA, rather than the other way around.

Let’s repeat for clarity.

This article is about “little circles of DNA”, referred to as ecDNA, or extra-chromosomal DNA, which seem to be tied to tumor resistance and survival. ecDNA is the name traditionally associated with the little circles of DNA prevalent in TUMORS.

It’s an exciting and active area of research, and I highly recommend the article. Note that the author is Ryan Cross, who has done all kinds of great vaccine reporting for C&EN.

LINK: https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/oncology/curious-DNA-circles-make-treating/98/i40

Now, let me explain why this freaked me out.

What do you know, the Inovio DNA vaccine for coronavirus injects you with little circular bits of DNA, too!

That image is from a GREAT slideshow, which explains the FANTASTIC (and I mean it) probable and in some cases PROVEN upside of the technology.

You will note, as you watch the slideshow, that the technology is even useful AGAINST virus-caused cancers, by increasing immunity to those specific viruses. The POSITIVES on the technology are GREAT.

https://www.slideshare.net/Companyspotlight/inovio-sep13pres

But what about the downside? What are the RISKS of new technology so similar to what it is being used against – meaning little bits of DNA or RNA that CAUSE tumors?

Well, there’s nothing in the slideshow. But let’s ask ON OUR OWN.

NOW – the circular DNA used by the vaccine is referred to as a plasmid.

Plasmid is another name for a small circle of DNA. Not only are plasmids of certain natures very similar to the circular DNA (ecDNA) expressed BY tumors in humans (see above article), the plasmids of some bacteria can actually CAUSE tumors, e.g., the “Ti plasmid”, which stands for Tumor-inducing plasmid, which infects and causes galls to form in plants, by hijacking their cells using DNA.

LINK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ti_plasmid

Now – I’m not arguing that plasmid-based vaccines, working as they are SUPPOSED TO WORK, are going to cause cancer, or are even LIKELY to cause cancer. But I’m not going to exclude the possibility – the KNOWN UNKNOWN – that if something goes wrong, they MIGHT cause cancer.

To see how REASONABLE it is to associate cancer with eccDNA of various kinds, just read about those “names” for the circular DNA that I was just mentioning. BOTH Wikipedia articles have extensive sections on the role of these types of DNA in cancer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrachromosomal_DNA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrachromosomal_circular_DNA

And now, let’s make things even WORSE, by adding VIRUSES and IMMUNE DISORDERS.

Now – I’m not a “true believer” in Judy Mikovits. However, her obsession with XMRVs (a type of retrovirus) has really forced me to understand just how much of a MESS viruses actually are. The REALITY of retroviruses is GODAWFUL. Viruses, and particularly retroviruses, have made a complete MESS of RNA and DNA. They LITERALLY write themselves into the genome like GRAFFITI IN BOOKS, and they’ve damn near filled the books. Worse still, they started doing it so long ago, and have done it so much – to the point that some think retroviruses are RESPONSIBLE for DNA evolving as a solution to genetic storage – that I’m not even sure that this history occurred ON THIS PLANET.

It is extremely worthwhile to read the following, including the sections on gene therapy and CANCER, to understand the BASICS of retroviruses.

LINK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrovirus

All of this is not enough to “know” that DNA and mRNA vaccines are going to do anything “bad” in the long term. But it is VERY apparent that DNA and RNA are a MESS – the “cental dogma” of untouchable, royally decreeing DNA is a laughable LIE, and vaccine biology operates in a china shop filled with blind lunatics on bicycles, drunk bears, and children with firehoses.

Everything taken together, I simply don’t trust the new mRNA and DNA vaccines to have figured out known unknowns, let alone unknown unknowns, that won’t become evident for 75 years and 2 generations.

My advice? Avoid the part of the “central dogma” that is blatantly untrue – that DNA is “read-only” except by blessed mechanisms.

PROTEIN IS SAFETY (disregarding snake venoms, of course). If you are risk averse, PROTEIN like NOVAVAX is where to take your chances.

Thus, you will be seeing me shilling primarily for Novavax, particularly to the vaccine hesitant, the young, the healthy, and the future or present parents. I will shill the other stuff to the other folks.

Now you know why.

Calling All Prayer Warriors

I get a lot of revelations in the shower, but they’re usually of a scientific or political nature, not a religious one.

This one just hit me like a ton of bricks, but gentle as a breeze. When in my mind, troubled by the days ahead, I uttered the words HAND OF GOD – I immediately felt a powerful understanding and peace wash over me – PEACE AND STRENGTH – and right then, I knew that this was something that must be shared.

We need to pray for the HAND OF GOD to descend on us with power, comfort, and STRENGTH, so that we may stand firm and resolute – to NOT be incited to violence – to stand for PEACE when the easy solution is WAR.

To not be afraid, but rather to be confident. To go forth strongly and with PURPOSE, clear in our righteousness, filled with mercy and understanding.

Remember it, when you are troubled.

HAND OF GOD.

And your troubles will be swept away, with POWER not your own.

SO…..

We have just FOUR DAYS until the election.

MAKE THE MOST OF THEM.