“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
Before we begin this inspiring part of our signers of the Declaration of Independence series, I have one more note for the readers on the research involved in this series. Many of the historical accounts disagree with each other on specifics. For example some may have a person leaving a town for another in one year and others in a different year. Some may include career details in one place or another doing one one thing or another that are different than other accounts. Some of our subject signers left journals, letters and other accounts for posterity; while others left nothing, just the accounts of supporters and detractors. I have one account of a person dying in one year, but attending a gala later that same year. Details matter, however, in doing these summarized accounts of American Patriot lives going back over three centuries, I reserve the right to miss the mark in the minor details as I am working from other people’s sources and works. I consider numerous accounts before I write. I attempt to ferret through the details and determine what I believe best summarizes the truth and message learned from their lives. I also want to represent them as real people like all of us, not some gods whose actions or words cannot be questioned. After all, there is only the one I AM that holds that title.
It is now time for us to review the role of an important group of patriot trouble makers toward the British Crown. Their role is unquestioned in moving the needle toward independence for the colonists.
The Sons of Liberty
We started this series with John Hancock, a card carrying member of the Sons of Liberty if there ever was one. We can easily see how he would be associated with this loosely organized group of patriots who were antagonists to the Brits. He was proud of his role in the early days of the independence movement. To learn more about this group please read the link below.
Not much else needs said about them. You did not want to cross them, they would make your life miserable if you were an American loyalist Tory or sympathizer. They were some of the most important founding fathers of our nation. One Son of Liberty may have been the most important in the movement and I have briefly discussed him previously.
Samuel Adams
From the link above…
“The Sons’ most prominent leader was Samuel Adams, the son of a wealthy brewer who was more interested in radical rabble-rousing than commerce. Adams wrote his masters thesis at Harvard on the lawfulness of resisting British rule. While George Washington eventually led the war effort against the British, “the truth is that there might not have been a fight to begin with had it not been for the work of Sam Adams,” writes historian Les Standiford.”
Both Adams and Hancock were hated and feared by the Brits as will be discussed later in this story. Samuel Adams was so outspoken about independence that he put the world on notice while a student at Harvard, a college that was filled with loyalist students sent there by their aristocratic, Tory parents. It is no wonder that fellow average colonists who desired independence joined in with the Sons of Liberty’s exploits to push the Brits beyond their limits.
Samuel Adams was born in 1722 in Boston. He was the son of Samuel and Mary Adams, Sr. He was one of twelve children, however, only three survived past the age of three. His father was a wealthy merchant and deacon in the Puritan Church. His father became active in Boston politics and eventually rose to elected office in the MA House of Representatives. Integrity was instilled in the couple that passed to their son. Adams, Sr. was active in the town meetings and sided with the popular party, which was the precursor to the Whigs, or, Patriot party.
His parents hoped young Samuel would gravitate more toward ministry in the church, but as time passed Samuel became more involved in politics. After Harvard, Samuel became a partner in his father’s malthouse business. He was not a good businessman at all and it eventually was closed. During the period the local economy began experiencing a cash shortage. His father became involved with other business leaders in creating a local land bank that included the creation of paper currency in 1739 by using borrower mortgages as security. Most of the area citizens fully supported it, which concerned the loyalists. The aristocratic, Court Party held control over governance and used the Brits to dissolve the bank through an act of Parliament. Directors of the bank who included young Samuel’s father were held personally liable for all of the currency outstanding, which had to be repaid in gold and silver. Lawsuits continued over the years even after his father’s death. As Samuel dealt with them it remained a constant reminder to him of the untrustworthy Brits and loyalists, the Tories. It became fuel for his patriot fire.
Meanwhile Samuel’s interest and influence in politics and independence continued to grow. He was elected to a clerk position of the Boston market in 1747. To understand more about the market, Faneuil Hall, its origin and place in the American revolution, please read the link below.
At that point Samuel also assumed control over his family’s affairs when his father passed away a year later. A year after that he married Elizabeth Checkley, his pastor’s daughter. She bore them six children over the next seven years, but only two survived to adulthood. Elizabeth passed away with the stillbirth of their last child. Some years later he married Elizabeth Wells and they had no children.
As his prominence and popularity grew, in 1756 he was elected into the position of tax collector. The problem was he could not always force himself to collect taxes from some of the people. However, that did make him even more popular with the people. By 1765 the deficit in collections had risen significantly and become a governmental problem. His political opponents used it against him and by 1768 he was forced to pay a large judgment. Friends helped raise funds and a portion was written off. Yet, it did nothing to reduce his popularity with the people and the “popular party” of patriots.
The Brits had incurred huge debts in the winning of the French and Indian War. They looked to the colonies as a source of taxation to repay much of it, rationalizing their victory helped the colonies. Through the years leading up to the Declaration of Independence, Adams contested every move and interpretation taken by the Brits and loyalists. He led boycotts to counter. This led to confrontations over the Sugar Act, the Stamp Act, the Townshends Act, and more. Many times his arguments and boycotts were successful. However, it did not stop the Brits from overreach. Finally, with the British occupation of Boston by four regiments of troops in 1768, Adams gave up any hope of reconciliation.
Adams continued to try to get the Brits to remove their regiments without full success. This culminated in the Boston Massacre of 1770 when five colonists were killed. Through his efforts this led to the remaining regiments being withdrawn from Boston even if the Brits resisted allowing trials of their murdering soldiers. In a compromise he arranged for his cousin, John Adams, to defend the accused to present a more balanced view of the hearings to both colonists and Brits. Six of the eight soldiers involved were acquitted of charges. The other two received reduced sentences for manslaughter with a simple branding on a hand.
Please note that despite many other depictions and representations, Samuel and John Adams were cousins, not brothers. They also became political opponents later in life.
The resolution of the Boston Massacre led to a “quiet” period of a couple of years. After losing an election for Register of Deeds, Samuel won another term to the MA House of Representatives. When the Brits took over the colonists’ role of paying the Governor, Lt. Governor and Superior Court Justices; Adams and supporters felt the Brits had overstepped their legal authority once again. Adams and associates devised a system of Committees of Correspondence to circulate information throughout the colony about the British activities. Loyalist Governor Hutchinson became concerned and entered into this discourse, which gave Adams an opening to make his points for the colonists and in support of independence. In mid 1773 Adams and associates seized the opportunity and published the widely circulated Boston Pamphlet that addressed colonist rights along with the past written statements from letters of the loyalist Governor to Adams. This effectively ended Hutchinson’s political career.
When Parliament passed the Tea Tax later in 1773 the colonies went into a rage due to the effect it would have on the economy of the colonies. This soon led to the often referenced Boston Tea Party and the Brits’ responses through the Coercive Acts. As they say, the rest is history; all of which Adams was in the middle of as a charismatic, rebel leader of the colonists along with John Hancock.
The events leading to the Revolutionary War began to happen at an increasing pace. After attending the First Continental Congress, Hancock and Adams decided to stay at Hancock’s Lexington home when they were informed by fellow patriots that British General Gage had been dispatched from Boston with troops for their capture. They escaped, but this move by Gage incited the American militia in Lexington and Concord to battle them in the start of the Revolutionary War.
As the Second Continental Congress met and the Declaration of Independence was introduced and signed by Adams and the others, he began a crusade against American loyalists. In a 1776 speech in Philadelphia, he went after all who sided with the Crown. “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom—go from us in peace,” Adams said. “We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you.” A few years later he pushed for exiling all loyalists as well as the payment of reparations through confiscating their properties. He considered them traitors to the America he loved.
He helped draft the Articles of Confederation and in 1781 returned to Boston where he entered state politics. He was elected to the MA Senate, Lt. Governor and later Governor for three, one year terms after Hancock passed away. He remained a man of the people and supported free education for all including women, which was considered highly controversial. He tried to return to national politics as he had concerns about the soon to be enacted Constitution, but was not successful. In the end he signed along with Hancock to ratify the Constitution, which was approved by a narrow majority in MA. His influence began to wane and he lost a vote in 1796 for a potential VP position to his cousin, John Adams, on the Thomas Jefferson ticket. He was pleased when his cousin lost a run for POTUS four years later.
At that point he retired. He and his wife had no financial issues as he had received income from his surgeon son who had served in the Revolutionary War when he passed away at age 37. The couple had always lived modestly, so they had enough. He passed away in 1803 at the age of 81 from Essential Tremors that had plagued him the last decade of his life.
Samuel Adams was a political firebrand with Puritan ethics and integrity that influenced legions of moderate colonists to embrace independence. He had been deeply influenced in his younger years during his education and from literature that held the view and belief that all people are born with specific rights and that governments exist by consent of the people. It fit his worldview as a Puritan and patriot. This was imprinted even more deeply into his being when he observed what the Brits and American Tories did to the land bank. The resulting legal hardships it caused his father and later, himself, as he handled the family affairs after his father died were never forgotten. He wanted all Americans who sought independence to be free of the oppressors.
There may never have been a Revolutionary War and our independence without patriots such as Samuel Adams and the Sons of Liberty.
Charles Carroll
Seemingly entering the scene of patriots as a dignified wealthy aristocrat, Charles Carroll proved to have a steely resolve that was no less strong than that of John Hancock or Samuel Adams. Given his family’s background and circumstances one would think he would have sided with the Tories or otherwise taken a life of neutral, non-commitment to patriot causes. Perhaps his learned appreciation for all things French through the years influenced his future thoughts about British rule.
Charles “Charley” Carroll was born in Annapolis, MD in 1737 into a mega wealthy plantation family. At the time of the Revolution he was likely the wealthiest of all American colonists as he inherited a fortune of land and assets that was the equivalent of $375 million even then, the equivalent of multi billions today. His father’s side descended from Irish rulers and his mother’s side was English. Since they were Catholics, he attended Jesuit prep school until age 11 when he was sent to France where he was educated by Jesuits at St. Omer, France; at seminary in Rheims; as a graduate at the College of Louis the Grande in Bourges; as well as other studies in Paris and finally, an apprenticeship in law in London. He returned to Maryland in 1765 in the middle of the rancor of the Stamp Act that he adamantly opposed. He became involved immediately as his dignified manner and intelligence helped bring order to the response. He enthusiastically joined a group of patriots and fully supported independence even if it meant armed conflict. He made himself quite clear with the quote, “Neither my millions nor my writing will settle this just cause, but the bayonet will.”
Carroll was elected to represent Maryland on the 4th of July and was too late to vote for the Declaration, however he arrived in time to sign it. Since Carroll was a common surname, he signed it Charles Carroll of Carrollton. At which time he told Hancock, “Let there be no doubt there is only one Carrollton.” Throughout the period leading up to the signing Carroll had been a tireless promoter of independence and debated frequently with great eloquence and skill from his religious and law background. He represented Maryland within the Samuel Adams promoted Committees of Correspondence. Due to his fluency in the language he was chosen along with Benjamin Franklin, Samuel Chase and his cousin John Carroll to visit with French Canadian Catholics to seek assistance for the colonies. The effort was unsuccessful. This lack of success only strengthened his patriotic resolve.
He served on the Board of War during some of the darkest years for the colonies. He remained a staunch defender of George Washington as well as a close friend. Both were like-minded conservatives by nature from planters backgrounds and opposed the confiscation of Tory land that Samuel Adams and others proposed. They both fought against the enlistment of slaves into the army without there being adequate compensation to slave owners.
He served two years in the Continental Congress before returning to his native Maryland to assist in state government, where he was elected into the Maryland Senate and for a brief period as a U. S. Senator. He resigned the latter when he was prohibited by law from serving both roles as he much preferred serving his state. He did so in the MD Senate for nearly 25 years until retirement.
He was somewhat ambivalent about the issue of slavery. The Carroll family owned the most slaves of anybody at the start of the Revolution. He personally owned 400 – 500 at one point. Yet, he stated frequently his desire for slavery to end and even introduced a bill to gradually do so, which failed. Even with his beliefs on the issue he still did not release his own. In the later years of his life he supported and led the movement to return slaves to a free status in the nation of Liberia and other African nations.
He retired from public life and politics in 1801. He would occasionally be seen in ceremonial roles through the years. Much of his time was spent operating his many businesses. He lived the longest of all Declaration signers and passed away at age 95 in 1832.
His story could have stopped there. Most historical accounts of him do.
However, at this point in my research I noticed little had been stated about Carroll’s personal and family life in historical accounts other than his early years and his wife’s name, who passed away sometime around the end of the Revolutionary War. I searched deeper and found two sites dedicated to telling more of his personal story. The one quoted and linked below probably reveals why many historians did not go “there”…
“His family had become a wreck during his continued absences. His wife was addicted to opium before her death and his son, Charles Carroll of Homewood, soon became a miserable alcoholic. Carroll tried to intervene to save his family, but more often than not, his efforts were futile.
His record as a slave owner and early abolitionist is a testament to his faith. He sold slaves, but avoided breaking up families, and he offered weekly religious instruction. He once presented a bill in the Maryland Senate for the gradual abolition of slavery which required all slave girls to be educated and then freed at twenty-eight so they could in turn educate their husbands and children. When several proposals for abolition failed, he joined the American Colonization Society and in 1830 was elected president of that organization. Three older slaves kneeled at his bedside the night of his death, practicing the Catholic faith his religious instruction provided them.“
On his return to Maryland in 1765, Charles Carroll was given a 10,000-acre land tract called Carrollton, located in Frederick County. Although he would never live there, Carroll added the word “Carrollton” to his signature to distinguish himself from other Charles Carrolls. In 1768, he married his cousin, Mary “Molly” Darnall, and began major improvements to his family’s urban home and gardens in Annapolis. They had seven children, only three of whom lived to adulthood. Charles, their only son, would later live at Homewood, now located on the Baltimore campus of Johns Hopkins University.
The Carrolls were busy and gracious hosts to such dignitaries and governmental leaders as George Washington and the Marquis de Lafayette. The house and grounds were the scenes for many social events, “humble feasts” and after-the-races dinners. Politics kept the family busy through the Revolutionary War and in 1783, the Annapolis house and grounds were the sites of the Official State Celebration for Peace and Independence:
“Elegant and plentiful dinner provided for the celebration of Peace on Carroll’s Green; … sheep, calves, and whole ox were roasted, liquor in proportion … A convenient, extensive building was erected sufficient for the accommodations of many hundreds. Patriotic toasts were drunk, each attended with thirteen cannon. After dinner at night, the Statehouse, a superb building, was beautifully and magnificently illuminated and an elegant entertainment given to the ladies at the ball-room …” April 24, 1783, Maryland Gazette
No person, even the mega wealthy, is exempt from toil, trouble, and personal issues in the struggle of living well. Charles Carroll was another legendary patriot who overcame many challenges and America was the better for it. Despite being raised in wealth, Samuel Adams battled through numerous hardships that would have destroyed lesser men and lived in very modest conditions in retirement with serious physical limitations and far less popularity.
These men, their families, and supporters serve as reminders that freedom is not free for us. Do you count yourself as a modern day Son or Daughter of Liberty? We the People need you.
I first want to say, PLEASE at least skim this article. Gunderson documents the false flags the US government has used to control us for decades. I have run out of time, so please excuse my mistakes.
Continuing from last week, now on to the meaty subject of Ted L. Gunderson. He is a whistle-blower & was Agent in Charge of FBI field offices in Los Angeles, Memphis, and Dallas. He is quite interesting, especially given he was poisoned with arsenic powder sprinkled in his home and car after he retired. (1 hour)
I was going to include Colonel Tower’s videos about Operation Gladio since it gives you the WHY but I will do that next week. In a nutshell, to fund Operation Gladio (Color Revolutions and such) the CIA uses ‘off the books’ money from drug running, arms trafficking, — from guns and ammo to fighter jets and helicopters — and human trafficking — from slaves to child sex workers. Drugs and sex are also used to control politicians, the media, judges and such. If that doesn’t work??? Well there is always threats, entrapment, imprisonment and assassination.
And speaking of assassinations, that was Ted Gunderson’s fate.
[Left click on page and open image in new tab. You can then enlarge the print using [Ctrl] [+] — GC]
Theodore L. Gunderson was poisoned with Arsenic to death a few months after writing this affidavit…
Ted L Gunderson, former head of FBI in Los Angeles, Memphis, and Dallas, was poisoned with arsenic says Dr Ed Lucidi who saw Ted’s body before and after he passed away. Dr. Ed treated Mr Gunderson, who suffered bladder cancer and died as a result of its spread at age 82. LINK
At 9 minutes in that video, Dr Lucidi talks of Gunderson’s arsenic poisoning and the signs [Black nails and body turning black after death.] Also that Ted found arsenic dust in his apartment & locked car.(18 min)
Dr Lucidi then goes into WHY Doctor MacDonald was targeted.The CIA was shipping cocaine back to the States via the body cavities of the Dead soldiers.
Dr MacDonald, as an army doctor became aware of this drug pipeline and thus was framed for the murder of his family. This ties directly into the CIA and their method of funding Operation Gladio coups. So we now, with the recent New Years False Flags, have several interesting links to Fort Bragg, including the 4th Psy Op group that Badlands Media loves. And speaking of Psy-ops, at around 29 minutes in the video, Ted says, “…the MK Ultra program has been very actively administered not only at Offutt Air Force Base [but] at Fort Brag North Carolina, the place where Dr MacDonald’s family was slaughtered in 1970…”— GC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ADDENDUM: I just found this clean transcript of the GUNDERSON PRESENTATION, MAY 12, 2005, LINK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Another, transcript of one of Ted’s one hour videos with added information can be found at:
It is a similar video but goes more in depth into the child trafficking. It is not surprising to see, that since I started work on this article, this video, posted by Truth Mafia, has been taken down.
I am going to take their summary and add my own bits and pieces from the video I have link above, that is still up. I am using most of the transcript from You-tube with a bit of clean up and editing by me. Since this summary does not cover all the cases I am going to insert missing information in the same order as Ted presented it. I am also going to include links and other information that cover the cases Ted Gunderson talks about. I will use the labels “Summary” and “Video” to differentiate between the two sources.
Summary
➡ This text tells the story of Ted Gunderson, a former FBI official who exposed a child abuse ring involving powerful figures in America. Despite facing threats and obstacles, Gunderson revealed a network of child trafficking that extended beyond Nebraska and involved high-ranking officials. His investigations echo in recent scandals involving Jeffrey Epstein and P. Diddy, showing a pattern of powerful elites exploiting their influence to commit heinous acts and avoid accountability. Gunderson’s courage reminds us that truth, no matter how deeply buried, will always surface.
FBI & CIA
As part of the video intro, ted says:
…. I do have credentials…. Believe me if you read the Internet you may not think so because there are some heavy duty FBI informants out there like Stu, Webb, and Barbara Hartwell, who are MK Ultra mind control victims. CIA mind control victims who are making all kinds of disparaging remarks about me.
So right off the bat, he connects the CIA to the FBI and both to the control of information. Because without that control of information the Cabal’s grip on the world slips.
…..
Rothschilds & Adam Weishaupt.
If you use Yandex.com to search those 2 names together it gets into some really bizarre areas. Expose News and Order of the Illuminati are just two examples Yandex brings up. Ted source of information is Commander Carr’s Pawns in the Game (Link to the actual book)
This book was written by a high ranking Canadian naval officer with connections in both military and intelligence agencies. He identifies a group of ‘International Bankers’ as the “secret power” behind world revolutions, and documents the history of their activities as they fund wars and upheavals from Cromwell to WWII. He covers wars and revolutions throughout Europe from 1640 to 1940, but of special interest are his insights into the Spanish Civil War (1936) and events leading to WWII, since these are not well covered in most other accounts…
William Guy Carr died in 1959 of unexplained causes four years after publishing “Pawns in the Game”. He was 64. His son published one of his other important books “Satan, Prince of this World”, after his death.
When the author of this book, Commander W.J.G. Carr died on October 2, 1959, he left this book in manuscript form along with many scribbled notes, reference books, half formulated thoughts, etc. His last wish was that the book be finished and published in order that all men might know of the plot which exists to wipe out every trace of decency in the world and all civilizations as we know them now. Such a task is manifestly beyond ordinary means. I, his oldest son, have been asked to try and edit, revise and correct the manuscript as best possible before publication. This I have done to the best of my limited ability.
I have not added anything to the original draft or changed anything except where requested to do so in marginal notes in my father’s own handwriting. I found the work frustrating because it was far beyond the scope of my ability. At the same time, I found it extremely interesting and rewarding as I tried to sort out the thoughts and ideas of a man who died almost seven years ago.
At some points in the manuscript I found notes such as: “Check the accuracy of such and such a point” or “dig out more information on such and such a person”. On each occasion, I deleted the point queried completely, for it was always my father’s strong belief that nothing should ever be written until completely proved out in the light of existing knowledge. Since I do not have the necessary sense of values to decide what information should or should not be used in such cases, I felt safest by leaving the information out completely.
The fact that there are only thirteen chapters in this book will annoy some people and frustrate others: I think all who read it will be left in a state of restlessness. “The Unfinished Symphony” has never been completed and this book will not be completed either, except as each reader finishes it for himself in the future by personal experience as the story unfolds. Many of you will scoff at the statements made in this book; many will toss it aside as the ravings of a madman; some will be unable to finish the book because it will arouse anxieties and fears that cannot be faced. But many others, and I hope that they will be in the majority, will find in this work the answers to some of the most perplexing of the problems that have faced men since the beginning of time and provide material for pondering possible solutions to the future….
Please also read the forward by Commander Carr. (pg 6)
….
As I said last week, this is not a rabbit hole it is a a rabbit warren, a network of interconnected burrows. And what a mess it is!
From the video:
Let’s go back to 1776 May the 1st.. Adam Weishaupt was commissioned by the Rothchild family to set up the goals to control and the final goal was the take over of the world with a One World Government.
Adam Weishaupt came up with 25 goals. Among these goals were control the Press, corrupt the youth through sex and drugs, elect our own people, our own people meaning the Illuminati, to key positions in all levels of the government. City, County, State and Federal and it goes on. The final goal was to take over the world with a One World Government.
[The] information is very well documented by William Guy Carr in his magazine excuse me, in his book Pawns in the Game.
To me this is a critical point. The ‘Cabal’ goes back CENTURIES, not decades and is deeply entangled in not just the USA but everywhere. At the end of the video Ted also mentions satanism — 4 million practicing in America today… 50,000 to 60,000 human sacrifices a year.
In the video Ted starts off with his first case as a private investigator. It ties drug running from South East Asia (Vietnam) to military bases; a cover-up by military intelligence at Fort Bragg; the involvement of sons and daughters of military personnel in the Satanic Cult who actually committed the murders; all to protect that CIA drug pipeline. Note that these same Cult members were the distributors of the drugs up and down the east coast.
As of 2014, I still do not know if Dr Jeffrey R McDonald has finally been released from prison.
“We discovered how the defense, the jury, and the judge were prevented by prosecutors from seeing the extensive evidence of outside assailants collected at the crime scene as revealed in CID laboratory notes. This critical material – my entire defense, if you will – remained hidden. As later proven in documents acquired through the Freedom of Information Act, the critical CID lab notes had been carefully collected by prosecutor Murtagh, who left the Army to build his career on my case. He had kept the lab notes in his briefcase in the courtroom throughout my seven-week trial.” Dr. MacDonald wrote,
“Murtagh’s fellow prosecutor, James Blackburn, repeatedly told the court, ‘Where is the evidence of outside assailants? Where is the evidence that Helena Stoeckley was ever inside 544 Castle Drive?”
It was in the brief case of his fellow prosecutor as he knew damn well! Reminds me all to well of the Jan 6ers.
McMartin Preschool case
Digging for tunnels on the McMartin Preschool grounds
Summary:
➡ Dr. Gary Stickel, a UCLA archaeologist, discovered tunnels under a school, leading to the uncovering of a covert criminal enterprise involving military intelligence. This enterprise, known as the Franklin cover-up, involved kidnapping children from foster homes and orphanages for sex trafficking. The operation, which is documented in a book, involved flying the children to Washington, D.C. for sex orgies with prominent figures. Despite evidence and demands for investigation, the FBI has refused to look into the matter.
This actually combines one or more cases. From the Video:
The next case I worked of a major consequence was the McMartin preschool case in Manhattan Beach, California. The children there claimed there were tunnels under the school. That they were taken into the tunnels and through the tunnels up into the trap door of a bathroom in a Triplex next door, placed in automobiles and prostituted in the community. These are two, three, and four year-old children before they entered kindergarten. In addition the children claimed that they were flown into the mountains where they were involved with adults in robes. Black robes, Chanting, Candles. They talked about the brown babies who were sacrificed. Who were cut up, actually sacrificed. In checking into this and researching this of course this was obviously a satanic ceremony. The McMartin family who owned the preschool they were tried of Ray Buckey and his grandmother. The grandmother was acquitted. Hung jury on Ray Buckey, the second trial another hunt jury.
I had an opportunity in 1990 to gain control of the school. Now the school had been given to Danny Davis the defense attorney and he had sold it even though he made $15 million on the case by the way. He had sold it to a contractor who was going to take it down. When I learned this, I contacted the contractor. I said I want to be given an opportunity to go on that school and look for the tunnels. The authorities had looked for them in 1987. They said they could find no tunnels. Along with some of the parents ,we hired Dr Gary Stickel, UCLA archaeologist. He hired his crew and brought them in. And in 34 days Dr Stickel said there had been tunnels under that school. They were covered up and they were covered in.
An informant of mine told me that there was an abandoned satanic site in Crestline California up in the mountains I went up into the mountains and obtain copies, photocopies [of] photographs of the site…
Makes you wonder what evidence those California fires are burning… Think the Standard Hotel. Think the 1986 Presidio Child Development Center scandal in San Francisco….
Please at least skim the above article. It is not long. Ted worked a lot with John DeCamp.
From the video:
12:50
From there I became involved in another case. A very frightening case because I established with the help of people like John DeCamp former state senator of Nebraska that we have in this country today, a covert Military Criminal Enterprise Government. An Enterprise primarily by US military intelligence that is operating Full Throttle and everybody refuses to investigate it. In the Nebraska case, it’s called the Franklin Cover-up, this is the book here, that Johnny DeCamp wrote by the way. It’s all documented in there and in that particular instance they were taking children out of foster homes & orphanages [like] Boy’s Town, driving them from Omaha Nebraska to Sioux City Iowa 184 miles away. Placing them in private jets and flying them to Washington DC for sex orgies with prominent people including Congressman, senators and certain people in the White House it’s well documented.
And we wonder why our congress critters vote the way they do?
John DeCamp, CONVENIENTLY died at age 76, July 27,2017, after battling Parkinson’s disease and other illnesses. He spent his final days at the State Veterans Home in Norfolk Nebraska. LINK
When a person is first diagnosed with PD, they are often told “You will die with Parkinson’s disease, not of Parkinson’s disease”. This means that PD is not a fatal disease per se and end of life often occurs at an old age from another medical illness entirely. End-Stage Parkinson’s Disease & Death | APDA
For more information on the Franklin Cover-up there is:
Nick Bryant: “The Franklin scandal” is about an interstate pedophile network that flew kids from coast to coast. What we are seeing with Jeffrey Epstein, we saw in the Franklin scandal, although I think the Franklin pandering network was much, much bigger than Jeffrey Epstein’s network. There were two primary pimps. There was a pimp in Nebraska, Larry King. He was getting children that had fallen through the cracks, from foster-care homes, from Boy’s Town Orphanage and from some other institutions. There was another pimp living in Washington, DC, who was involved in this, Craig Spence, who had his home wired for audio-visual blackmail. Anybody who took part in any of those parties at Craig Spence’s home was definitely blackmailed.…
Before I went on the wild goose chase with Rusty I made a video of myself and disseminated it to some people and I said exactly what I was going to be looking for, and that I was going to be with Rusty Nelson. So, if anything had happened to me, that video would have been indispensable in a court of law. I backed myself up that way. Pictures had gotten Gary Caradori killed, so I knew that going for pictures was very, very dangerous. This was absolutely “smoking gun” material….Well, no one has ever sued me. “The Franklin Scandal” is layered with corroboration and vetted by an attorney. I told Trine Day, my publisher, “You guys have got to really vet this. What we are saying about a lot of people is pretty horrific. I am confident I am telling the truth here, but you’ve got to vet it.” So, it was vetted by an attorney and no one has ever accused me of libel over the years it has been out. No one has ever accused me of fabricating anything. It’s a very solid piece of investigative journalism.
But the Wikipedia page about the Franklin child abuse allegations has some very autocratic operators who will not let any truth about The Franklin Scandal enter that page. I’ve had wars with them and there’s other people who have tried to make changes to that page. So people look at the Wikipedia page and I am summarily dismissed as a lunatic.
For what it is worth, someone at Badlands Media commented that Wiki is run by the CIA.
Back to the video:
I replaced a fellow named Gary Caradori who was the investigator for a Nebraska Senate committee. Gary met the official photographer of the group who had split from the group, defected. [he] agreed to take the pictures that this official photographer gave him. They met in Chicago. And he agreed to take the pictures back to the committee. He flew out of Chicago in his private plane. A short distance out of Chicago the plane exploded midair. His briefcase has never been found. He and his 11-year-old boy died. The rear seat of the airplane has never been found. I had made every attempt possible to obtain possession of or control of that plane because I wanted to examine it for bomb chemicals particularly the back seat. It’s no longer available. Nobody knows what happened to it.
Gary kadori was a civilian yet it [the plane] was taken to a military base for examination. A deputy sheriff was the first one on the scene he saw the pictures. He started picking up the pictures and FBI agent came along took the pictures away from him. Told him to keep his mouth shut. He started talking to a few people. A year later his wife was murdered. He’s no longer talking.
This International child kidnapping ring I later learned was out of Washington D.C. It was very active and the organization is known as the Finders. I have a report on the Finders back there. Everything I’m telling you is documented by the way. The Finders has been established and operating throughout the 1960s up to the present time. It was exposed in 1987, [so] they moved their operation to Wichita Kansas and they’re operating right today in Wichita Kansas.
So Nick Bryant had good reason to be nervous about getting concrete evidence.
I have taken my report to the FBI a half a dozen times demanded an investigation and I have yet to be interviewed. So we have the Finders, we have the Franklin Coverup, which documents what I’m telling you. We have the Game of Pawns. [which] is the Illuminati. This is the Illuminati, the Satanic movement, in this country today and the last thing I’m going to mention in the way of a book is Why Johnny Can’t Come Home.
➡ Johnny, a boy from Iowa, was kidnapped and used as a sex slave in a covert CIA mind control project. He escaped and briefly returned to his mother in 1997 before disappearing again. The case is linked to the Nebraska case and the CIA’s MkUltra mind control program, which was investigated by Congress in 1987. This program, still active today, involves training individuals for various tasks, including assassinations, and has connections to powerful figures and institutions, including Boys Town, Nebraska, a respected children’s charity.
➡ Larry King, a prominent businessman, was accused of abusing children from Boys Town, a home for troubled youth. Despite reports of his actions, no action was taken due to his influence and connections. However, in 1988, his financial crimes led to his arrest and the exposure of his pedophilic activities. Despite the evidence and testimonies, many of the influential people involved in the abuse were not prosecuted due to their power and status.
➡ The text discusses a horrifying scenario where children were manipulated and abused by a man named Larry King. King used drugs to control the children, who were then forced into sexual acts and threatened with violence. The text also mentions a disturbing ritual involving murder and sacrifice of children, which was believed to bring power through invoking demons. The victims were often very young and were brainwashed into participating in these horrific acts.
➡ In 1990, a child abuse ring was discovered in Nebraska, but the media and law enforcement discredited the victims instead of investigating the accused. The FBI and local police didn’t take the victims’ allegations seriously, and even pressured them to change their stories. When one investigator died in a suspicious plane crash, his evidence was quickly seized by the FBI. Despite the victims being acknowledged as abused, the grand jury dismissed their allegations and instead charged one victim with perjury.
➡ In 1991, Alicia Owen was sentenced to 9-25 years in prison due to a false child abuse story by Troy Bonner. Alan Baer was fined $500 for aiding prostitution, and Peter Citron served two years for a similar crime. Larry King, however, never faced child sex charges due to Bonner’s lies, but was sentenced to 15 years for a $40 million fraud. John de Camp believes this case shows a failure of justice and hopes to expose it, despite strong opposition and claims of cover-ups in high places.
…Years later, on February 5, 1999, in a civil action in a U.S. District Court in Lincoln, Nebraska, Paul Bonacci painstakingly recounted the sordid, heart breaking details of Johnny Gosch’s abduction and forced participation in an elite government sponsored pedophile sex slave ring, that dehumanized and controlled its young, hapless victims using techniques such as drugs, murder, satanic rituals, sexual abuse, and torture, resulting in MPD (multiple-personality disorder). The children were systemically programmed and “zombified” as part of the CIA’s ongoing, under-the-radar MK-ULTRA (MK = mind control) mind control program….
Paul Bonacci knew what he was talking about regarding Johnny Gosch’s kidnapping in 1982. Why? Because he was there! Bonacci’s role within the pedophile ring was simultaneously that of a victim and a perpetrator. Actually, the then 16 year old Paul Bonacci was the person who had lured and then forced Johnny into the back of the car that screeched away on that fateful September morning. It was Bonacci who had helped drug Johnny, and then proceeded to initiate him into the group, his new “family”, by sexually assaulting him.
Bonacci himself had been abducted and pressed into service as an MK-ULTRA sex slave by Lawrence E. King, a high ranking Republican operative who managed Franklin Savings and Loan in Omaha, Nebraska as a front for an internationally organized pedophile ring. He ran this pedophile ring for the benefit of government, military, and big business elites, whose patronage included political blackmail, snuff films, kiddy pornography, prostitution, illegal arms and drug running, extortion, and money laundering. This was the same Larry King who allegedly ran the infamous midnight “call-boy” tours of the White House, along with Craig Spence. Amazingly, the White House pedophile story was headlined by the Washington Times, on June 29, 1989.….
Unbelievibly, now Noreen is threatened with another loss, as if the 1982 brutal kidnapping of her son Johnny wasn’t enough. A scoundrel is using the courts to paint Noreen into a legal and financial corner in order to to steal HER remaining book inventory and the reprint rights to HER book…
The theft of her book is a way to bankrupt her and shut her up of course.
That article leads to this unsavory character and his wife Lilith. Note the winged eyebrows on this dude.
LTC Michael Aquino and his wife Lilith. Aquino was a practicing satanist, but whether he actually believed in it or used it for his role as mind-control and rape of women and children only he knows.
…The Presidio Child Development Center scandal was reported on beginning in 1986 in San Francisco. As in the Franklin case, there is no question children had been sexually abused. Literally dozens of children were medically examined and showed signs of genital and anal trauma, and 5 to 6, depending on reports, contracted chlamydia, a sexually contracted disease . The game became what could be prosecuted in a court of law.
Many of the children repeatedly identified Aquino as being present when they were transported from the base to area homes for ritualized abuse.
Aquino lived in the area and eventually his home was raided based on descriptions provided by the children of not only a satanic décor, but a soundproof room with photography and video recording equipment inside. Photographs of naked children were carried out of the Aquino home in clear trash bags, along with video tapes and other evidence. Of course, Aquino was never brought up on charges, most likely because of the level of prominence of the people depicted in those photographs and movies raping children.
The Army took over a yearto close the daycare. About the only thing it did even half right was ensure Aquino would never get promoted.
…the mother Noreen Gosch was dumbfounded didn’t know what happened demanded an investigation by the FBI and by the West Des Moines Police Department. The chief of police in West Des Moines said to her, even though he disappeared, we do not have any witnesses who saw him being grabbed and placed in a car or being taken control of, 👉so we’re not going to investigate it.👈 The FBI used the same premise they refused to investigate it. Now I’ve been involved in kidnappings in the FBI and I can tell you that it’s automatic within 24 hours, 👉at the end of 24 hours that we had to go in.👈 In my day this was back in the 50s, 60s and 70s we had to go in and start investigating the case after they’ve disappeared for 24 hours.
Today as we as I stand here and you sit there the children are disappearing in this country at the rate of 83 per hour that’s over 700,000 children a year now. I can go back to July 1982 the Readers Digest claimed there were 100,000 children disappearing every year. There’s another statistic that I find very interesting and that is that it is estimated 2,500 children are kidnapped and murdered in this country every year….
Now we know why the DemonRats are so interested in ‘unaccompanied children’ and why they ‘disappear’ from the system. The USA now has a much lower birth rate and parents are more careful about keeping a sharp watch on their kids compared to the 1950s & 60s. The pedos and satanists, needed a fresh source.
Back to the video:
I personally talk to one of the youngsters who was involved in this network. I’ve talked to several of them and he assures me that Jeff Ganon is in fact Johnny Gosch.
Well how did Johnny Gosch get from a West Des Moines Iowa 12 years old, all the way, with the phony press pass, into the White House as of a few weeks ago. What happened to Johnny is that he was transported from West Des Moines to Sioux City. He was placed on a farm for 3 weeks [and] sexually molested. He was taken to the mountains in Colorado placed in a cage in a house of some sort or cabin. And then later he was used as a sex slave. They didn’t kill him they didn’t sacrifice him although a number of these kids are sacrificed in satanic ceremonies. He escaped with another young man. They stole a car and in 1997 Johnny knocked on his mother’s door at 2:30 in the morning. Gosch said he wanted to talk to her. He was there with another young boy. He came in. He told [her] in the rain. He says “mother I was kidnapped.” Kidnapped, I’ve been placed in a covert military CIA controlled mind control project and used as a sex slave. He said I can’t come forward at this time. They will kill me and then he left in the rain . She says that’s the last time she talked to him.
[It’s] 1997 now. Now several years after that, a girl named Burns who was a producer for 20-20 decided to do a story on the Johnny Gosch kidnapping and the Nebraska case. And She interviewed me. In fact I spent 5 days with her. Gave her the benefit of all my research, which is available to you folks also. Then she got a lead that Johnny was hiding out on an Indian reservation in northern Minnesota she went there and flushed him out. He basically went into hiding and now he shows up at the White House. He was a mind control victim.
27:00 MK ULTRA MIND CONTROL PROGRAM
If you don’t know anything about MK Ultra mind control program, it came into this country through the German scientists after World War II. They were involved with the Nazis during the war and prior to World War II in developing robots and individuals to be used on command for anything that they wish ,including assassinations and other nefarious activity. The MK Ultra program, CIA mind control program, was investigated by Congress in 1987. Congress said CIA you got to quit doing that that. You’re bad boys and they said we will quit. Don’t kid yourself. It’s is very active today. There are people like Barbara Hartwell out there who are mind control victims. She’s another one who’s been bashing me. I must be doing a pretty good job because I wouldn’t have these people criticizing me on the internet like they do. Of course it doesn’t bother me in the least.
But going back to the Nebraska case [and] MK Ultra. A lot of this training took place at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha Nebraska which was strategic care command headquarters. You recall after 9-11 the president flew to I think it was the South someplace in Louisiana or New Orleans and then he flew to Offutt Air Force Base in the afternoon of September 11th. They had a party there that morning at 9:30 in the morning. He missed the party. He was sorry he missed the party. Warren Buffett was there by the way.
The MK Ultra program has been very actively administered not only at Offutt Air Force Base, [but] at Fort Brag North Carolina, the place where Dr McDonald’s family was slaughtered in 1970.
32 minutes. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION
I used to be in charge of the FBI in Dallas. So in checking into the Jack Kennedy assassination, I learned no question about it that it was a joint hit by the CIA and the Chicago mob. Sam Giancana was head of the mob in Chicago. Three days before he was to testify before Congress, [he]was shot and killed…
33 minutes PEARL HARBOR
I interviewed the naval intelligence officer who on December 4th 1941 received information that the Japanese were going to bomb Pearl Harbor. We had broken the secret code of the Japanese. He told me personally, on December the 4th, he gave it to his superiors they passed it up the line…
34 – 36 minutes WACO TEXAS
..look at Waco. The military was involved in destroying, shooting and killing women and children. Also the FBI. They use tanks, military tanks in violation of Posse Comitatus… They got away with it… in Waco there were four ATF agents who were shot and killed. some of the BranchDavidians were tried sentenced for these quote murders… in researching the four ATF agents who were shot, I learned every one of them was shot in the head. Now for those of you who have been in the military that’s a sniper shot no question about it. [in] one of [the] men the bullet trajectory was from above down through his lip and into his body probably from a helicopter. It’s interesting to note that these four men, ATF agents, at one time were all bodyguards for former President Bill Clinton..
37:09 WORLD TRADE CENTER CAR BOMBING
We have the 1993… the car bombing of the World Trade Center. I have a copy of the New York Times [from] October 28th 1993. And in the article was reporting from The Trial that took place [of] an FBI informant named Salam who was in among the terrorists. He testified that he was commissioned by the terrorists to put the bomb together to bomb the World Trade Center in February 1993.
Fortunately for him, when he met with the terrorist he wore a body mic so he could record every word that was said. Unknown to the FBI, when he met with the FBI, he also wore a body mic. That was probably what kept him from being set up and framed and sent to prison. This is actually in this newspaper article he went to his FBI superiors. [He] says I’ve been commissioned to put the bomb together we’re going to use a dummy bomb aren’t we and 👉he was told by his FBI superiors no we’re going to use a real bomb.👈
Now I don’t understand why Congress and Senate investigators and our leaders in Washington DC are not jumping up and down over that situation. 👉The FBI not only knew in advance of the car bombing, they furnished the ingredients for the bomb. [ Jan 6th Pipe Bomb anyone? – GC] 👈
Why doesn’t somebody take some action in that area. Why doesn’t somebody investigate this International child kidnapping ring being operated by the CIA. Why are these congressmen voting on bills like the Patriot Act which takes away many of our constitution rights and civil liberties in the best interest of quote protection for our country and protection from the terrorists.
Let me tell you something ladies and gentlemen, there are people in our government, a rogue outfit, whatever I’m not sure who, are actually Behind These Terrorist Acts. And the reason they’re behind the terrorist acts is so they can pass bills like the Patriot Act and the reason the congressmen and the Senators vote for these stupid bills. Stupid by our terms and our definition, is because they’ve have been set up and framed through sex and drugs.
40:11 OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING
So then we have Oklahoma City 1995.
I personally made two trips to Oklahoma City. I investigated Oklahoma City. Because of my report, the defense attorney for Timothy McVeigh, sent two of his investigators to interview me. I spent four hours with them actually. I got a lot of information out of them. For example they told me that they were allowed to tour the remains of the M building in Oklahoma City in the presence of a US Marshall, but they were not allowed under any circumstances to take soil samples or to pick up any evidence for examination. Stephen Jones was their attorney.
I heard that they were going to tear down the building.
Now you can trace bombs through what they call the tagging chemicals. When I heard this, I called John deCamp. I said, “John we’ve got to prevent that building from coming down.” I actually called an outfit in Chicago of the Pat Kennedy group, who are specialists in examining evidence of this type. John called McVeigh’s attorney, Jones. Because John had a client who he was representing, who was involved in the case, John said I’ll handle the paper. We’ll have a hearing. We will prevent that building from coming down. The next thing we heard the building was coming down. John called Jones. “What’s going on and he had no good answer for it. That was evidence. I’ve been at many a crime scene and it is critical that the evidence be preserved. That was a huge cover up.
McVeigh wrote a letter to his sister. [Jennifer] was in Special Forces. The government said the military says “oh no he flunked out” He didn’t flunk out. He was recruited out of Special Forces according to him in a letter he wrote to his sister. [He was recruited] to be trained to be a CIA assassin and also to work for the CIA International drug operation both against the competition and for the CIA pro- drug people. McVeigh was in my opinion an MK Ultra mind control victim. He was visited in prison in Oklahoma and in Colorado by Dr Jolly West. This was secret by the way, I happen to find out because I made some phone calls to the right people. Jolly West was one of the foremost leaders along with Sidney Gottlieb and the CIA’s MK Ultra mind control operation.
Some additional information about Dr Jolly West, so you understand the implications of what Ted is talking about:
Correspondence Between Jolly West and Sidney Gottlieb, Director of the CIA’s Operation MKULTRA (1 minute video)
Jul 21, 2022
Never-before published internal documents from the Lackland Air Force base psychiatrist who was secretly contracted to the CIA’s MKULTRA program to experiment with airman using drugs and hypnosis — without their knowledge. These exclusive letters between psychiatrist Louis “Jolly” West and MKULTRA’s director, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, outline the men’s plans for creating mind controlled assassins. Their work began in June 1953, one year before the murder of three-year-old Chere Jo Horton by Lackland airman Jimmy Shaver.
43:30
Why would somebody like Jolly West go interview McVeigh not only in Oklahoma but also in Colorado during the trial? Because he was a mind control victim himself. At one time it was reported, I think in US News & World Report, that McVeigh had a microchip in his buttocks. Our military reportedly have been using microchips to keep track of their soldiers.
The bomb in the truck allegedly was a fertilizer bomb. The government first announced that it was a 1500lb bomb and then a 2500 lb bomb and I think it ended up being 4,800 lb. That bomb that was in the truck destroyed half the building. A 4,800 lb fertilizer bomb, an ammonia nitrate fertilizer bomb dissipates and did not have the potential, the possibility, of destroying that much of the building. After the Oklahoma City bomb went off I had a call from a friend of mine, Michael Riconosciuto. For those of you who are making notes look up in the internet, Michael Riconosciuto. I’ve been working with Michael since the early 1980s, 1982.
44:55
It’s when I first met him. He was a CIA agent operative for some two decades he was also an FBI informant at one time. His father owned the Hercules Manufacturing in Silicone Valley California. Hercules manufacturing developed what is known as the electro-hydrodynamic gaseous fuel device which is a highly classified bomb. The bomb was was actually manufactured by Dyno Nobel out of Salt Lake City.
I want to stop here and mention Brave has ZERO info on “Electro-hydrodynamic gaseous fuel device” (I was trying to find the correct spelling.) However when I tried Yandex, I got a whole bunch of hits for “Hercules Manufacturing Electro-hydrodynamic gaseous fuel device” For example:
Now Michael, in the meantime, is in jail now. Right? In fact I talked to him yesterday because he started to talk before the Brooks committee about a very interesting case involving the Promis Software [Inslaw, 30 Inc.]. The Promis Software was a computer operation. They developed all kinds of intelligence information on you, and I, and every citizen in America. The Department of Justice leased it for two years. At the end of two years they refused to pay Bill and Nancy Hamilton the $10 million they owed them. Then the Department of Justice through Earl Bryant, past president of United Press International, took that computer [and] sold it around the world. Sold it to the French, to the English, Israelis, Canadians. Unknown to these foreign countries, [to] the officials in these foreign countries, there was a trap in the computer. A very clever trapdoor [that] secretly allowed us, the US government, to retrieve all the information they developed.
Michael Riconosciuto was the CIA agent who developed the trapdoor in the Promis Software Computer. When Congress started to investigate it in the late 1980s, they called on Michael. We want you to testify. Michael received a threatening phone call two weeks before he was to testify, he claimed. From a fellow named Peter Videnieks of the US Department of Justice. “If you testify you’ll be sorry.” Michael testified anyway. A few weeks later [He] was arrested for drugs [and] is now serving a 30-year prison sentence because he dared to expose these nefarious activities by this Rogue Criminal Enterprise operating within the confines of the US government.
Michael has been released and is scared to death he will meet the same fate as journalist Danny Casolaro. The documentary is by Christian Hansen & Zachary Treitz. Riconoscuito was one of the chief sources for Casolaro. Michael had a lot of inside info on the people concerned.
Back to the rest of the video.
47:30
I gave you a little background on Michael. Going back to Oklahoma City now, I want you to understand who Michael is. He’s not some guy walking down the street with a grocery basket looking for a recycling center okay? He has credibility. Now Michael called me right after the Oklahoma City bomb went off and he said Ted, (He called from prison by the way) that’s my bomb meaning [that it is the bomb] Hercules developed. That it was not an ammonium nitrate bomb. Now when that [Hercules] bomb was tested in 1982 I happened to be with a group of intelligence agents in Palm Springs waiting for the results of that test.
It was tested in Area 51. It was under estimated because the power, it was so powerful, that two of the technicians died. They underestimated the strength of it. This, I call it a barometric bomb, this barometric bomb, according to Michael was what was in the car not a fertilizer bomb. I have an Oklahoma City report on that. So what did I do as an investigator?
49 minutes
Well I went to the Picatinny Arsenal in New Jersey. I gave him the contract number which I obtained through a Science magazine. One of my associates actually did the research on that and I gave the public Picatinny Arsenal contract number and the Picatinny came back and said there’s no such contract here, even though I had the contract. By the way that’s documented in my report. I went to Dyno Nobel who I knew manufactured it and they didn’t even bother to respond. It’s interesting to note that a Dyno Nobel expert witness testified at the Grand Jury when they indicted McVeigh in September of 1995
50 minutes
Some five or six months after the 19th of April 1995 Oklahoma City, in an article in Fireman’s Magazine. It was written by the editor of Fireman’s Magazine. The information was obtained from the Oklahoma City Fire Department. In that article, again that’s in my report, in that article it states that four unexploded devices were taken out of the building. When people were in the building after the bombing, DYING, they discontinued the rescue efforts for some 5 hours, while they carried out a bunch of government files. Men in blue suits of some sort. Sweatsuits. So what I’m telling you is Oklahoma City was perpetrated by certain people other than McVeigh and Nichols and now Roger Moore.
If you read the paper recently, the gun dealer who claims that he was robbed of his guns in Arkansas and that that money was used to finance Oklahoma City Bombing, Roger Moore, has been accused by Terry Nichols of being involved in it. Roger Moore denies it. Roger Moore at the time of the Oklahoma City Bombing was an FBI informant.I had an Inside investigator in Oklahoma City tell me that there were at least 11 other individuals involved in Oklahoma City okay?
52 minutes 9-11 ATTACK ON THE TWIN TOWERS
That brings us up, we’ve gone through Pearl Harbor, Waco, Ruby Ridge, Car bombing 93, Oklahoma City 95, that brings us up to 9-11.
As I said my [client] was in prison. I’m his “investigator of record” which means I’m like an attorney. I should have access to him on a regular basis. I represent this man. For a year prior to 9-11, actually year and a half. I tried to get in and see Michael. He was in prison in Northern Pennsylvania. I was in the Philadelphia area. The Bureau of Prisons would not allow me to see [him.]
I finally was able to talk to Michael in January 2003. I flew to the east coast spent three days with him.
Michael told me that he had developed information from among his contacts in advance of 911 that they were going to be involved in using missiles, airplane missiles and they were going to be involved in skyjacking. They were training Arab terrorists. Also he knew the identity of the person in the United States. An Arab who lived in Patterson New Jersey who was the leader of terrorist activity by the Arabs in this country. Now Michael had this information, because you’re saying how can Michael develop this information being in prison? Because I met with Osama Bin Laden, along with Michael, along with the state department representative, in the spring of 1986.
At that time I was contacted by former top Reagan Ronnie Reagan official who said can we help the Afghan Rebels? They were our friends then. So I called Michael, and I said what do you think? He said let’s meet. So there was a fourth fellow there. We didn’t know at the time it was Osama Bin Laden. He actually used the name Tim Osman traveling under a Turkish passport. But because of Michael I passed the ball to him. I just arranged for the meeting and went on.
Michael traveled all over the world putting this package together to furnish the Afghan Rebels with the surface to air missiles that defeated the Soviets. Really shot down their helicopters. As a result of this Michael developed sources inside the Arab world. And that’s how Michael knew in advance about 911.
55 minutes
Michael told the FBI on March the 20th 2001 about this plan to use Skyjacked airplanes and use them as missiles. He also furnished to the FBI one of his sources, one of his confidential sources inside the Arab group. The FBI interviewed him, threatened him with prosecution and deported him. That man along with his family have disappeared. We think that they’re dead. The FBI refused, absolutely refused to look into this situation. More shocking is that Michael had the names of the people who were obtaining the false names. Of the people, the Arabs, who were obtaining false passports. had their names. He had the source who could furnish him that information he told FBI Agent Keith Cutri on March 20, 2001. He told Cutri. He says“I’ll give you these names, the name of this person who’s coordinating the whole project for the Arabs,providing I be given immunity and he be given immunity.”Mr. Cutri, in spite of the fact he was armed with this information six months prior to 9/11, came back two days after 9/11, on the 13th and saw Michael in prison again. [He] accused Michael of being anti-government, anti FBI, of being a publicity seeker, and so forth, being disloyal. And so Michael, of course, didn’t have much to say after that.
Michael is still in prison, as I said. But, we had this information. The FBI did nothing with it. Cutri admit it, on September 13, 2001. Admitted that the FBI did nothing with it. So, after I visited Michael, in 2003, I felt it was important that I confirm that the FBI did meet with him.
The Bureau of Prisons would not furnish Michael with the visitors list to confirm it. So I started writing letters to the FBI through Senator George Allen to confirm that he did in fact meet with them. I wanted to document it. I also asked for the identity of the other agent who was with agent Cutri and I had a terrible time. It took me a year and a half writing letters to the FBI to get them to admit that they’ interviewed Michael on March the 20th 2001. I finally did have that information. That information is available again in one of my reports. My terrorism report that I have in the bag. So that basically brings me up to the the present time.
I think my time is up but I feel compelled, as a former FBI agent, I had all this training and I feel compelled to do everything I can to educate as many fellow Americans as I can, as to what’s going on behind the scenes. We have being operated and orchestrated primarily by US military intelligence. A Covert Criminal Enterprise involving FBI and the CIA active in this country today. [It] is being covered up right from the beginning.
By the way, they tried to frame me on a drug deal back in 1984. It didn’t work. The girl that they used to try to frame me contacted me, and said I need to meet with you. We met, [and ]she told me the whole story. I took a signed statement from her. Her name is Pam Fawsett. And, I said to Pam, I said Pam you’re working for these people the DEA and the FBI in Modesto. By the way she was making phone calls to me. I said you’re working with the people trying to set me up. Why have you — and of course in the phone call she kept trying to get me to make admissions that had knowledge of a felony and I wouldn’t. I said I don’t have any knowledge of that or was involved in a felony.
Actually I said Pam look you were working with these people for 6 months. They gave you $2,000 you had the run of the FBI office. You had your own coffee cup. Why did you come to me and tell me this now. I’d helped her, give her little advice about her 14-year-old son in the interim. You know talking back and forth there, any individual would do [it] who might be able to help. She said Ted I woke up the other morning and I realized you’re the only honest son of a bitch I’ve talked to in 6 months. Those were her exact words.
The FBI not only tried to set me up on a drug deal, I’ve also been the victim of four separate investigations. They tried to set me up on a fraud case in Denver, in Dallas, and most recently. Very frankly I’ve been under surveillance, heavy surveillance. I’ve had illegal entries into my car into my apartment. There’s been attempts to gas me within the last month and I was able to anticipate it and avoid it. But they don’t want people like me out telling the truth and that’s what I’m doing.
1:00:57
I will not stop I will continue to do so in the future so that’s basically it. I brought you from 1776 to the present time. We went through one conspiracy after another.
I had given Jim Nichols my Oklahoma City bombing report. Jim said to Bryant Gumbel, he says, did you read Ted Gunderson’s Oklahoma City report. Gumbel says, “Oh, Ted Gunderson’s a conspiracy theorist.”
I want you to know I’m not I’m not a conspiracy theorist I’m a conspiracy realist. It is there. All you have to do is get your own website, get your own internet go out there. There’s a lot of disinformation out there but you can pick out what’s really solid and what’s really truthful.
1:02:00
I have done, I have 25 years of research. [It is] on that back table back there. If you buy any of my reports or this video tape or any of my material I want you to make a promise that you will make copies and distribute it far and wide. We need to wake up America right now. Let me emphasize again I’m not anti-American. I don’t believe in violence. I believe in change through legal means. But we need to wake up an apathetic sleeping society that is active in America today. This not only ties into MK Ultra – CIA, it ties into Satanism. There are approximately 4 million practicing Satanist in America today involved in the Nebraska case.
I can go on about satanic cults for another, but I think my time is almost up. I might mention that speaking of Satanism, there are between 50,000-60,000 human sacrifices, according to three different sources, in this country every year. The satanic cults operate secretly. The Satanic Cults are along with our Covert Criminal Enterprise within the government, a serious threat to our society
I thank you very much.
The Ted Gunderson Chronicles (Part 2) Various editions:
Joe Biden never won. This is our Real President – 45, 46, 47.
AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.
This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).
Our various sister sites, listed in the Blogroll in the sidebar
Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.
Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.
We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.
Joe Biden didn’t win.
And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.
Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Week:
vituperation
noun
abuse
rejection
sustained, harshly critical language
invective
severe censure
blame
vehemently expressed condemnation or disapproval
formal language that is full of hate
angry criticism
Used in a sentence by the Fake News (two examples)
(One will notice that most examples of this word in use on Merriam-Webster are against Trump and conservatives.)
Flash forward 92-plus years to Donald Trump’s rally Sunday at New York’s Madison Square Garden, a bleak, lurid festival of racist hate and profane vituperation so vile that even fellow Republicans, who have turned a blind eye to Trump’s character for years, are distancing themselves from the event. —Michael Hiltzik, Los Angeles Times, 29 Oct. 2024
The politicization of the COVID response has only worsened this trend, likely resulting in part from Trump’s vituperation. —Matt Motta, Scientific American, 29 Oct. 2024
Yeah, well, stuff it, you commies. Your pre-election biased writings FAILED. Trump is still your President.
Shown in a picture in a dictionary
Used in a “black metal” song title, shown in an artistic music video
Melancholic metal; interesting use of dance and B/W film, but these people need Jesus badly.
Well, Netflix, that CIA cultural corruption project, seems to finally be good for something. Enjoy this weird music, which is either a corruption of classical music, or a correction of pop music – take your pick. (PS – I know nothing about this series.)
THE STUFF
“What is best in life? Conan! Tell us!”
“Yes, but what is life?”
“To crush protons, to see higher nuclei driven before you, and to hear the calculations of their women!”
Before we go farther, I want to inform readers about the sourcing of my information, which should have been done in the opening story. All of the content is in the public record and accessible via the internet. As a result I am not listing the individual sources in my stories with one exception. I am also utilizing a special edition insert from The Sun newspaper of the Conway/Myrtle Beach area of SC from the 1990’s titled “The 56 Signers of the Declaration of Independence”. While on vacation there about 30 years ago I picked up this wonderful supplement to that newspaper and retained it in my files. It has been very helpful.
Our first three American patriot heroes were from the colonies of Massachusetts, New York and South Carolina. In our minds we can picture them in the assembly of many others from the colonies who were there to discuss their situations and the possible path forward. As they gathered there would be small group breakouts and much discussion, laughter, contentiousness, toasting, yawns, speech making, anger, joking, and even prayer. We tend to forget they were people just like us. Some slept well and others did not. Some were constipated, had colds, were stroke victims, walked with canes and so on. Some were healthy, near death, or somewhere in between. Some had alcohol addictions or drank socially while others abstained. Some had personality disorders. Some were loud braggarts and others were humble in spirit. Some were hawks and others were doves. They were all adult ages. There were the wealthy and those of more modest means. Some were reconciliatory toward the Brits and others could not rest until the last one on American soil was dead or back in England. Most missed their families, friends and life’s work at home while doing the work of We the People. They all had concerns and fears.
Most importantly, they all knew the magnitude of what they were doing.
When it came time for making decisions on the direction of the colonies and the formation of the new nation they were all focused on the task at hand to achieve consensus. As you will learn, many times the votes were split between the representatives within a state. These votes had consequences back home and some lost reelection for voting in ways that were against the will of the people. For the Declaration and Constitution that followed the war’s conclusion to come to fruition required divine inspiration and a guiding hand. As a result, God’s wisdom is interwoven into the document intentionally. The participants knew they were dependent upon God’s providence to succeed as they were going against the most formidable opponent in the world that they knew all too well. They demonstrated that understanding by referencing God multiple times in the documents.
Americans – Who Are We?
It is such a basic question, yet, I am afraid most people cannot answer adequately. For this part and those to come we need to review a foundational truth about America and being an American citizen. In my opinion it is most accurately reflected in something written by the great, great grandson of the next patriot I will feature. You may or may not be familiar with it, although it should be something imprinted in our heads and hearts as Americans. It was presented and accepted by the U. S. House of Representatives in 1917. As you read the words that follow, you will sense the passion and commitment. The statements may appear familiar, similar to those you see and hear that are associated with the America First MAGA movement today. Anybody or anything that seeks to change the definition of the following must do so within Constitutionally provided confines. Which is why the globalist criminals and other enemies of our nation work to corrupt and circumvent the Constitution at every opportunity. So as you read transport yourself back in time to the origin of it and understand the words contained within are in their purest form, uncorrupted by current times.
The American’s Creed
I believe in the United States of America as a government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed, a democracy in a republic, a sovereign Nation of many sovereign States; a perfect union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes.
I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it, to support its Constitution, to obey its laws, to respect its flag, and to defend it against all enemies.
Beginning at age 13 in the role of a page in the U. S. Capitol, Page had a 61 year career in public service. In the middle of that career at age 49 he entered the above Creed in a nationwide patriotism contest and won. He drew his inspiration and wording from a widevariety of documents including the Declaration, the preamble to the Constitution, and Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address.
Patriot William Tyler Page probably did not know at that time that some political and business globalist leaders had taken steps to completely undermine the very foundation of America and its Constitution four years previous to his Creed being accepted by the House. We can only speculate on how many of those elected representatives were in on that treason and sedition that ensued over the next century. The Creed is inscribed on a bronze tablet and displayed in the Capitol. How many of our current elected officials and administrative staffers even know it exists, much less believe the foundational truths it states?
What if those words that were written over a century ago by a descendent of a patriot signer of the Declaration of Independence have become the current marching orders for our America First MAGA movement that is led by President Donald J. Trump? We know our roles are to restore the republic and the American Way. The Creed is representative of the American Way. It is with it in mind that we turn to learning more about other Declaration signers.
Mr. Page descended from…
Carter Braxton
Carter Braxton was born into wealth on the Newington Plantation in King and Queen County, VA, east of Richmond in 1736. His maternal grandfather, King Carter, was the wealthiest man in VA at the time. Carter went to the College of William & Mary in the state and returned to be a planter. He married into wealth as well, wedding first the niece, Judith Robinson, of the Speaker of the House of Burgesses in the state. She later died during the birth of their second child. After she passed away he journeyed to England for two years before returning and later marrying his second wife, Elizabeth Corbin, who was also from a family of wealth and governance in VA. He is known to have a minimum of 16 children from the two marriages.
When his older brother died in 1761, Braxton became the wealthiest man in Virginia and of all of the signers of the Declaration. His holdings were so large that even after selling off large amounts of land for the war effort he still owned over 12,000 acres of farmland and 165 slaves after the Revolutionary War ended. With more land than cash to fund operations, he sold off 3500 acres over the next half dozen years and gave away many of his slaves to other family members and farmers. By the time of his death he had sold off or gave away more land to the point he only owned about 3900 acres. He differed from the other grandsons of his maternal grandfather as he wanted to continue slavery while they did not.
During his life he became very involved in politics and served in various roles from The House of Burgesses to county sheriff to colonel of a local militia. Considered a moderate to conservative in politics he was personally conflicted about independence and the war. Prior to the Declaration he served as intermediary when the Brits stole gunpowder owned by the colonists in VA. He negotiated a compromise financial settlement between Patrick Henry and his father in law who was a loyalist in government, Corbin, to settle it without conflict. For many years he could work in both worlds of the colonists and Brits while trying to bring compromise and mediate disputes.
However, the time came when he had to choose.
When Peyton Randolph of VA died in 1775 and John Hancock stepped into his role as President of the Continental Congress, Braxton was chosen to replace Randolph. It was in that role in 1776 that he signed the Declaration. It was an act that he took despite misgivings. He felt it was premature and had issued a pamphlet of his views to counter those of John Adams in his “Thoughts on Government”. However, he valued the unity of the colonists and agreed in consensus with the other signers. He then returned to his home soon afterwards and resumed roles in VA government, politics and with his plantation holdings.
No serious historian would question his commitment to the war efforts after signing. He gave and loaned a large amount of his wealth to the effort. During the war he lost half of his shipping interests and racked up large war debts that he struggled to repay. At one point he was even censured by the Continental Congress when his men illegally seized a neutral Portuguese vessel. He was constantly involved in business disputes and lawsuits. He basically was a royal pain in the azz from life’s challenges. The Brits inflicted great damage to many of his plantation holdings. His own business operations practices also created hardships as he made many mistakes. After the war he eventually moved to Richmond and more modest housing as he worked through his many financial mishaps. It is there where he is believed to have died after suffering a stroke that paralyzed him in 1797 at the age of 61. He was buried at his beloved Chericoke Plantation that is still owned by his descendants today.
He had outlived all five of his sons. However, there were many grandchildren that were produced from his children. A number of his descendants fought in the Confederate Army during the Civil War. A great grandson, John W. Stevenson served terms in the U. S House of Representatives, as a Senator, and as Governor of KY.
The years that followed his death have helped enhance his legacy. He is now seen as instrumental in winning the war, that his financial commitment to the cause was critical to the victory. During the gunpowder theft scandal it was his negotiation that kept Patrick Henry and men from engaging in a poorly thought out attack that would have caused the destruction of the town in the British response. In much the same manner he acted as a moderate to negotiate a resolution over unpopular duty taxes charged by the British before the war in VA.
Braxton was sympathetic toward the British and their interests often, but would never be considered a loyalist. He wanted to exhaust all avenues of compromise before resulting to more extreme measures. It is in that willingness to negotiate and seek common ground that he excelled. He became a legendary American hero despite being a large slave owner because he was willing to put all of his wealth on the line and work in government roles for the America he loved.
Thomas McKean
This one will take awhile. The historian and media focus seems to be on other founding fathers more often. But there are some real jewels for those who enjoy researching parallels and interconnections like I do. Hold on to your hats.
Thomas McKean was born in New London, PA in 1734. His father immigrated to America in 1720 and was a tavern owner. Thomas’ mother, Letitia, passed away when he was still a child in 1742. This led to his father becoming an alcoholic and incapable of raising their three children, so Thomas’ sister went to live with an uncle and aunt while he and his older brother, Robert, were taken into a school operated by Presbyterian minister Francis Alison in New Castle, DE. It was there he grew in all aspects of being a boy as well as in his studies. A noted Latin scholar, Rev. Alison was a leader of the Old Side (order and tradition) versus New Side (Great Awakening/Whitefield) struggle within the Presbyterian Church during the period. With the two sides reconciling in 1758, Rev. Alison continued to take the Old Side interpretation of theology.
At this point it is important to note that Thomas McKean is not the only signer of the Declaration of Independence that directly studied under Rev. Francis Alison in New Castle. It seems signers George Read and James Smith were his students as well. In addition the Secretary of the Continental Congress, Charles Thomson, also studied under Rev. Alison. Their foundational understanding of life and its application as well as education were rooted in the mentorship and teachings of one of the greats of the Presbyterian faith.
Funny, those truths never seem to make it into many of the historical accounts, publications and media reports about the clear interconnections of many of our patriot founders and their adherence to Christian principles in how they led and governed our nation. Rev. Alison was also a noted leader in the Philadelphia Synod of the American Presbyterian Church. He was a close friend of Benjamin Franklin who took a special assignment from same to assist in teaching and the development of the College of Philadelphia, which is now known as Ivy League school Penn. This is the school that educated eight future signers of the Declaration and twelve future signers of the Constitution, including Gouvenor Morris, the brother of Lewis Morris we discussed in the previous part. See link below.
Rev. Alison was a defender of Presbyterian theology in opposition to the influence of the Church of England. He stood with both feet firmly planted with American patriots. Finally, he was the founder of New Ark Academy that eventually merged into the institution that later became the University of Delaware. It is clear that Rev. Alison was a man of great accomplishment and value for the kingdom of God as well as this nation.
Among other connections through the years there is a major current connection, Donald J. Trump. The same Donald Trump that attended Penn University and graduated from its Wharton School of Business in 1968. The same Donald Trump whose mother was a Gaelic speaking Scottish Presbyterian who had immigrated to the States in 1930 and married Donald’s father, Fred, in 1936 at the Madison Avenue Presbyterian Church with its Old Side theology and connections decades before to member, Andrew Carnegie.
Fred Trump was already established as a real estate developer in the Queens area. Mary Anne MacLeod Trump became a naturalized citizen in 1942. Donald and all of his siblings were raised in the Old Side Presbyterian faith. A Christian worldview that has been expanded with his political career as POTUS that has introduced him to more evangelical elements of Christianity that would have common interests with the Presbyterian New Side and George Whitefield. Benjamin Franklin had commissioned a great preaching hall at the school where he wanted his close friend Whitefield to preach while there at Penn. Until 2020, Penn displayed a statute of Whitefield on its grounds. They placed it in storage to accommodate the woke cancel culture at that point.
Is it any wonder that Donald J. Trump is a flag loving American patriot with a historically rich Christian background? What Rev. Alison helped start at the behest of the American patriot great, Benjamin Franklin, is flowing through his veins. We see our heritage unfolding before us and why Donald Trump is willing to take a bullet for all of us. I dare say that no POTUS has ever worked harder for his country with more focus and dedication to American values than him.
Knowing this history, it is then no surprise that Thomas McKean was known to work harder and in more positions of service than any other signer of the Declaration. He learned at the feet of a master, which continued into the practice of law. After he finished school with Rev. Alison in 1750 he left and moved in with his uncle, John Finney, a wealthy attorney. He studied law there and passed the Delaware bar four years later. In 1753 he married his first wife, Mary Borden of Bordentown. Once again we find connections to the Revolutionary War era with local Bordentown resident Francis Hopkinson signing the Declaration along with Thomas Paine living there. Thomas McKean and his wife had six children together in the years that followed until her passing in 1763. A year later Thomas reconnected with a woman from his youth, Sarah Armitage, who was a toddler friend before he had been taken in by Rev. Alison. They married and moved to Philadelphia where they had four children together.
McKean was active in many roles throughout the region that ranged from law to holding government offices as well as in the military. He identified as a Country Party member in Delaware that supported independence from the British. The Court Party were loyalists. McKean’s family arrived from Britain as Irish Presbyterian refugees known as Scotch-Irish (Scots-Irish). The slogan “no taxation without representation ” originated with northern Irish Presbyterians and Catholics who were not allowed to vote in Parliament. McKean became a noted leader and represented Delaware in the Stamp Act Congress of 1765 along with Caesar Rodney. This work eventually led to the Continental Congress accepting the recommendation of McKean on voting procedures. The Congress of the Articles of Confederation adopted the practice and as a result, the young nation established the value of the equality of states in the composition of the U. S. Senate.
Despite living in Philadelphia, McKean remained a delegate to the First and Second Continental Congress representing Delaware. When it came time to vote for independence, the vote was split with McKean for it and George Read against it, which meant a tie for the state and no agreement. This led to McKean sending word to Caesar Rodney, the third DE delegate, to ride all night to come vote and break the tie. He did so and Delaware voted for independence. A few days later McKean joined the Fourth Battalion militia of the Philadelphia Associators that had been created by Benjamin Franklin, rising to the rank of colonel. The battalion joined in Gen. Washington’s defense in battles in New York and New Jersey. Having left soon after the vote to join the military, McKean did not sign the Declaration initially. It is speculated he signed after certification, possibly as late as 1781.
Not all went well in Delaware when other officials learned of the independence vote as the Court Party stood in direct opposition and all citizens were wary. McKean and Rodney were not reelected to their roles in the Congress as many sided with the loyalists or were fearful. That is until the Brits occupation of the colony/state after the Battle of Brandywine. Moods and attitudes changed quickly and McKean was reelected back to Congress in 1777. However, McKean and his family remained on the move as he was a top target of British forces. He and his family relocated five times in just a few years to stay out of their reach.
He served in Congress throughout the war and drafted The Articles of Confederation in 1783. He served in Delaware’s House of Assembly for several years beginning in 1776. For a brief period he was chosen as President of the Congress for an interim period. He also worked on keeping civic order and recruiting militia in Delaware during the period.
While all that was going on in the Congress and Delaware, McKean was also Chief Justice in Pennsylvania. Yup, he served in that capacity for 22 years. This service led to him being elected Governor of Pennsylvania from 1799 to 1808. He was noted for expanding free education and leading the local war effort in the War of 1812 at age 80. He spent his retirement in Philadelphia writing, talking politics, and enjoying the wealth he had gained with business and real estate investments. He passed away in 1817 at age 83 and is buried in Philadelphia. He was honored by many and there were probably just as many detractors at various points in his productive life. He had served an Assemblyman, Judge, Delegate, President of Congress, State Representative, Chief Justice, and Governor for a total of 36 terms over 42 years in three states (PA, DE, NJ), often holding office or acting in an official capacity in more than one state at the same time.
During his time as Chief Justice of PA, his decisions became part of the basis of the future ruling of Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury vs. Madison that freed the way for SCOTUS to overturn an unconstitutional law. It is a basic legal principle that applies to this day.
It is mind boggling that he survived all of his experiences and had time to be married and have ten children. I have linked a bullet point style summary of the man, events and his many accomplishments for those who want to know more.
Our government and judiciary today use principles and conduct business using practices that Thomas McKean established prior to, during and after the signing of the Declaration of Independence and Revolutionary War. He is a legendary American patriot.
Conclusion
There is only time to discuss two signers and the great grandson of one to keep this part from running too long. As we read we need to think about their actual lives. For example, we can clearly see that Thomas McKean was a workaholic that operated at a furious pace with a quick, highly intelligent mind that could accomplish many great things. We also see that he did so with zero concern for the potential personal repercussions. He did what he thought was right and damn the consequences. He seem to have developed this disciplined approach to life as a child and young adult from the mentorship of Rev. Alison and his uncle.
With Carter Braxton we see a man of great wealth and historical standing in the colonies with loyalist friends. He felt pulled between two worlds, yet, knew that what the King and Brits were doing was wrong and harmful to the colonists and their families. He saw the need to act as an intermediary attempting to find compromise to help prevent harm to either side, but in the end chose the way of freedom for the nation even if he did see that as something his slaves might be worthy of as well. When he committed, it was all in and the treasury of America was the beneficiary when they needed it most to battle the oppressors. He died with far less than he had, having given away much to the war effort as well as to family members during the last years of his life.
Both of these signers were larger than life figures. They had many people who thought highly of them as well as many detractors. However, the war results hung in the balance and may never have tipped in the colonists favor without them.
There is ample history to write about concerning the signers’ achievements and failures. Whereas the great, great grandson of Carter Braxton, William Tyler Page, served as a humble civil servant in a support role of a government apparatus that grew into the one we MAGA types abhor today. He worked most of his career as a clerk in the House of Representatives with involvement in the U. S. Flag Association. He married, had five children and passed away at age 74 in 1942. Yet, he left Americans with something we should all ascribe to believe and be for as long as America exists. He is also an America patriot, just like so many people who serve America without fanfare today.
I mentioned in last Wednesday’s article that I fell down an interesting rabbit hole, more like a rabbit warren, when looking in my notes for info on the John Maynard Keynes link to the Fabian Society.
This is the comment in my notes that started my latest journey.
Nicely done, Gail, very neat. The nail rapped smartly on the head 3 times. 🙂 I’ll raise you 137 years. 🙂
1st May, 1776, Rothschild commissioned a report on how to secure world domination: Go to youtube & put in their search box : Whistleblower Head of FBI tells all from NWO 1 hr 4 mins.
Or try the ref, it might work : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=do_swOstGaI [It still does work surprisingly. – GC] Ted L. Gunderson, ex head of FBI in LA, would not shut up about what he’d learned. He wound up poisoned with arsenic.
Is the plan coming apart? http://www.usawatchdog.com & scroll down to the article: US Currency Weak and About to Crash. 02/12/2014 371 comments. ( which I haven’t had time to read. Karen is ex Chief Legal Counsel for the World Bank.
Is this lady the real deal, or is she full of it? Anyone?
In the comments on that article is this link from 2014,Philosophy of Metricswhich looks interesting.
ABOUT
Philosophy of Metrics is the methodology of understanding the world through patterns and processes. From the ancient philosophy of primitive man to the stock market today, there is a pattern in everything and anything. We but need to observe and recognize the macro and micro of it all.
One of the biggest patterns is the one of ignorance. We are subjected daily to methods of misdirection and direct obfuscation which serve to keep us blind to the realities that surround us.
Our modest intent is to lift the fog on the mysteries and allow some of these patterns to become visible, whereby we may better understand the world and our place within it.
I bring that comment up because it is the patterns and threads I am trying to follow since we now know our history as taught is bull schiff.
I would say she is a Limited Hangout (1) given the blurb from this Utube:
In 2007 Karen warned the US Treasury Department and US Congress that the US would lose its right to appoint the President of the World Bank if the current American President of the World Bank did not play by the rules. The 66 year old Gentlemen’s Agreement that Europe would appoint the Managing Director of the IMF and US would appoint the World Bank President ended in 2010 http://www.imf.org/external/np/cm/201… Karen Hudesstudied law at Yale Law Schoolandeconomics at the University of Amsterdam .
She worked in theUS Export Import Bankof the US from 1980-1985 and in theLegal Department of the World Bankfrom 1986-2007. SheestablishedtheNon Governmental Organization Committee of the International Law Section of the American Bar Associationandthe Committee on Multilateralism and the Accountability of International Organizations of the American Branch of the International Law Association.
State governments and their political subdivisions can’t use bankruptcy. NOTE: A popular argument in movement circles contends that this whole nation was placed into bankruptcy in 1930 and Roosevelt devised a plan to get judicial approval of the “bankruptcy” via the decision in the 1938 Erie Railroad case. But how can such a legal theory fly in view of the decision in this case? — LIMITS OF CONGRESSIONAL POWERS – Constitution Org
“…at a town hall meeting I said since John F Kennedy was assassinated by the Jesuits, and we know this because Gambino when he got out of jail said that the mafia were told by the Jesuits to fire the kill shot. There was a a mafioso hidden in a sewer so as the limousine drove by that’s that’s the shot that killed John F Kennedy.
Did you know for example that we had a second constitution in 1871 after the debts for the Revolutionary War came due and we couldn’t meet those obligations?That’s when we got a second Constitution. So that the United States is incorporated as a company. The president of the United States is the chief executive officer and the Congress acts like managers of the company rather than representing the constituency. Rather than respecting our first Constitution. This is understood by a number of people. There’s a lot of documentation on this. Now people are starting to spread the world word. You’re not going to get this in your universities. You’re not going to be taught this in the schools…”
She is spouting chaff meant to divert attention away from the CIA in my opinion. Why? I think it is because of these two whistle-blowers getting traction and because of the rise of the Tea Party Movement.
“Today I resigned from the staff of the International Monetary Fund after over 12 years, and after 1000 days of official fund work in the field, hawking your medicine and your bag of tricks to governments and to peoples in Latin America and the Caribbean and Africa. To me, resignation is a priceless liberation, for with it I have taken the first big step to that place where I may hope to wash my hands of what in my mind’s eye is the blood of millions of poor and starving peoples. Mr. Camdessus, the blood is so much, you know, it runs in rivers. It dries up too; it cakes all over me; sometimes I feel that there is not enough soap in the whole world to cleanse me from the things that I did do in your name and in the name of your predecessors, and under your official seal. “
With those words, Davison Budhoo, a senior economist with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for more than 12 years, publicly resigned in May, 1988. A native Grenadian, Budhoo received his degree from the London School of Economics. He joined the staff of the World Bank in 1966 and later shifted to the IMF, where he was responsible for designing and implementing Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) for African, Latin American and Caribbean nations. His 100-plus page open letter to Michel Camdessus, managing director of the IMF, titled “Enough is Enough,” sent shock waves around the world, making front page headlines in many countries (but not in the US).
Budhoo was the first person to break the IMF’s code of silence regarding internal affairs by exposing extensive statistical fraud carried out by the fund in Trinidad and Tobago during 1985-1987….
The other was Confessions of an Economic Hitman – describing how as a highly paid professional, John Perkins helped the World Bank. cheat poor countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then take over their economies. Also note that the finger is pointed at the USA (to generate hatred of the USA) and not the REAL culprit, the globalists.
“….He was an amazing man, Torrijos. And so, he died in a fiery airplane crash, which was connected to a tape recorder with explosives in it, which—I was there. I had been working with him. I knew that we economic hit men had failed. I knew the jackals were closing in on him, and the next thing, his plane exploded with a tape recorder with a bomb in it. There’s no question in my mind that it was C.I.A. sanctioned, and most—many Latin American investigators have come to the same conclusion. Of course, we never heard about that in our country.…” Democracy Now Org 2004
The IMF/World Bank uses Structural Adjustment Policies, SAPs, to open up countries to exploitation by corporations. Instead of a British Empire overtly colonizing the world — heavily criticized by a voting public — we have Corporate and Banking interests united in the covert control of whole nations in the name of profit….
(There have been 249 captures of this article by the Wayback!)
Structural Adjustment Policies are economic policies which countries must follow in order to qualify for new World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) loans and help them make debt repayments on the older debts owed to commercial banks, governments and the World Bank. Although SAPs are designed for individual countries but have common guiding principles and features which include export-led growth; privatisation and liberalisation; and the efficiency of the free market.
SAPs often result in deep cuts in programmes like education, health and social care…
By devaluing the currency and simultaneously removing price controls, the immediate effect of a SAP is.. that riots are a frequent result….
“…privatisation and liberalisation; and the efficiency of the free market...” Those are just the feel good words the Global Cabal uses to hide what they are actually doing. I will get into that in the next article.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The second rabbit hole warren from this comment, — Ted L. Gunderson, Whistleblower Head of FBI — deserves its own separate article so I will address it next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Rabbit hole #3
The Lord moves in mysterious ways. He even drags an agnostic such as myself, to the truth, on Sunday no less.
I remembered an article talking of the Supreme Court case that allows the bureaucracy to MAKE law. The federal Register and 30 day comment period was the fig leaf for “consent of the governed” blessed by that Supreme Court case. A few days ago I went looking for that info and all I could find was the happy horse schiff from the Federal Reserve, March 14, 1936 — March 14, 2006
On December 10, 1934, at the Supreme Court, the Assistant Attorney General of the United States had been grilled during oral arguments in the first case to reach the Court challenging the constitutionality of the centerpiece of President Roosevelt’s “New Deal” — the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA). The critical constitutional issues at stake were mostly ignored that day while the Justices focused on the fact that the defendants, two Texas oil companies, had been charged with violating a provision of regulations that technically did not exist at the time the companies were charged. The defects in the case highlighted a fundamental problem facing a democratic government that was exploding with new agencies and new regulations. Amidst the ferment of orders and codes issuing from agencies, even individuals working at the highest levels of government found it difficult or impossible to keep track of all of them. And for the regulated public, this new body of “executive legislation” was inaccessible and virtually hidden. The next day, at the White House, where the great men of the New Deal [You mean Commie TRAITORS don’t you?…] had been arguing over the value of publishing a gazette containing the orders issued by Executive Branch officers, President Roosevelt laid aside his misgivings about possible misuse of the publication for propagandistic purposes and appointed a committee of the National Emergency Council to make a special study of the idea. Meanwhile, behind-the-scenes maneuvering by lawmakers and influential legal minds, including Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, culminated in the publication on December 11, 1934 of a Harvard Law Review article by, Ervin Griswold entitled “Government in Ignorance of the Law – A Plea for Better Publication of 👉Executive Legislation.👈” The arguments Griswold made for orderly publication of the official actions of the Executive Branch were underlined when the Supreme Court issued its opinion in the Panama Oil case and forced the hand of the committee studying the issue for President Roosevelt. Congress passed legislation to create the Federal Register, and the President signed it into law (Pub. L. 74-220, July 26, 1935). The Act created a lasting partnership between the National Archives and the Government Printing Office. The Archivist of the United States, acting through a Division in the National Archives, was charged with custody of and, with the Public Printer, prompt and uniform printing and distribution of public documents in a publication designated the Federal Register…
In those notes on the Fabians, I had this but not the Utube I got it from:
Min 1:00 — 3:38
On the interpretation of two main clauses of the constitution, the first is the commerce clause which delegates to congress the authority to regulate commerce among the states. The second is the necessary and proper clause which provided for the congress to have the powers that are necessary and proper for carrying into execution the other powers, the explicit powers and unfortunately those words have been given a broader interpretation than was intended by the framers.
On my website constitution.org and on my blog constitutionalism.blogspot.com
I have a number of articles that examine the problems arising from this misinterpretation and the arguments and evidence for why the clauses should not be interpreted in that way. But this evening I’m going to focus on the line of supreme court presidents that led to where we are today. There are 44 main supreme court presidents. There are many more cases than that, but most of those others cite one or more of these 44 cases. So if one were to overturn these 44 cases, and in fact you wouldn’t need to overturn all of them, if you overturned the first few the rest would fall because the later ones are based on the earlier ones. But for the sake of completeness if one were to propose amendments to the constitution to overturn these bad precedents, which are about the only way they are going to get overturned, then it would be necessary to unravel them fairly specifically. And the way to word such an amendment is not at all obvious, it requires a good deal of analysis and thought and i hope to assemble teams of experts to work out the wording. For how to do that in the meantime i have proposed my own wording if on constitution.org you will find a link to constitutional amendments…
So I tried to find the video but could not and instead I fell down a very interesting rabbit hole leading to
His videos: https://www.youtube.com/user/JonRoland1787
Gee! I think those are the Droids I was looking for! 🤗 And WOW what a treasure trove of information on the Constitution. Linked below are just two of the goodies at that website.
Find out just what the people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.— Frederick Douglass, civil rights activist, Aug. 4, 1857
Any power that can be abused will be abused. — Tyranny Law #1
Abuse always expands to fill the limits of resistance to it. — Tyranny Law #2
If people don’t resist the abuses of others, they will have no one to resist the abuses of themselves, and tyranny will prevail. — Tyranny Law #3
Usurpations
Usurpation is the exercise of powers by an agent which have not been delegated to him by the principal. In a constitutional republic like the United States of America, acts by officials are legitimate only if they are consistent with and based on a constitution, a body of laws which are superior to all subsequent statutes and other acts of officials, which embodies all delegations of power, and which may recognize certain rights to further define the limits on the powers delegated. It is a fundamental principle that all acts of officials not derived from the delegated powers of the constitution are null and void from inception, not just from the point at which a court may find them unconstitutional. Every person who has an encounter with the acts of officials has the duty not only to obey legitimate official acts, but to help enforce them, but, when there is a conflict among acts of officials, to enforce the superior one, which, when an act of an official is in conflict with the constitution, means enforcing the constitution and not the act in conflict with it. Judges and other citizens do not decide constitutionality, but discover it, and every person who is involved with any act by an official has a nondelegatable duty to make a determination of the constitutionality of that act. This determination is called constitutional review, and, when exercised by a judge in a case, judicial review.
Since the ratification of the Constitution for the United States and each of its properly ratified amendments, there have been numerous acts by officials, including statutes, regulations, executive orders, court rulings, and ordinary decisions and actions taken while on duty and under color of law, which have been unconstitutional, and in many cases, in violation of civil rights of persons and of constitutional laws. We will try to identify some of the worst of such violations of the Constitution, and discuss how compliance with the Constitution can be restored.
Then follows over 50 links to other articles and documents.
…. His Constitution.org site also had this with 25 articles referenced:
The doctrine of nondelegation is explicit or implicit in all written constitutions that impose a structural separation of powers. It is usually applied in questions of constitutionally improper delegations of legislative powers to executive branch officials, but may be more broadly applied to questions of improper delegations of legislative powers to judicial officials, improper delegations of judicial powers to legislative or executive officials, improper delegations of executive powers to legislative or judicial officials, improper delegations of legislative or judicial powers to clerical subordinates within their branches, or improper delegations of legislative, judicial, or executive powers to private parties, or improper delegations of private powers to public officials. Although it is usually constitutional for executive officials to delegate executive powers to executive branch subordinates, there can also be improper delegations of powers within an executive branch.
Finally, there is the broadest application of all, the nondelegation from the people of a power to any officials in a constitution, the principle of which is set forth in the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
An example of one of the documents referenced in this article:
Congress sometimes has a habit of passing laws with very broad mandates, then leaving it up to administrative agencies to fill in all of the policy details later.
In the 1930s, the Supreme Court blew the whistle on this practice,finding several times that Congress could not give away lawmaking powers vested in it by Article I of the Constitution. In 1935 in Schechter Poultry Company v. U.S., for example, the court struck down parts of the National Industrial Recovery Act, which essentially delegated legislative powers to administrative agencies and private parties to write rules to govern the American economy. Congress had given only the vaguest guidance as to how to do it–ensuring “fair competition.”
The principle that Congress could not delegate away its Article I lawmaking powers to administrative agencies came to be known as the “nondelegation doctrine.”
Six Decades of Dormancy
For six decades the nondelegation doctrine has pretty much been asleep. In 1980, in Industrial Union Dept AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute, then-Associate Justice William H. Rehnquist summarized the three main functions of the nondelegation doctrine: it guarantees that key social policy decisions will be made by Congress, it ensures that administrative agencies get an “intelligible principle” by which to exercise their discretion, and it guarantees that courts reviewing administrative actions will have ascertainable and meaningful standards against which to judge them.
But no court has dared question a legislative enactment as a violation of the doctrine for a long time –that is, until the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia rendered its decision last year in American Trucking Association v. Environmental Protection Agency. There, the court found that the EPA’s “construction of the Clean Air Act. . . in promulgating the NAAQS (National Air Ambient Quality Standards) effects an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power.” The court said that, in delegating so much power to the EPA to decide clean air rules, “it is as though Congress commanded EPA to select ‘big guys,’ and EPA announced that it would evaluate candidates based on height and weight, but revealed no cut-off point. The announcement. . .is fatally incomplete. The reasonable person responds, ‘How tall? How heavy?'” With this vivid analogy, the nondelegation doctrine sprung back to life.
Revived or Put Into Deeper Sleep?
Or did it? The problem with the D.C. Circuit’s so-called “revival” of the nondelegation doctrine is that it looks a lot more like a burial. The court’s tortured formulation of the problem makes no sense. It is not the EPA’s construction of the statute that effects an unconstitutional delegation; it is Congress’ statute itself. EPA’s construction of the statute cannot determine, much less cure, its constitutionality. Yet, having made this fundamental error, the court follows through on it by remanding the case to the EPA to come up with an “intelligible principle” that will, amazingly, somehow magically cure the statute of its unconstitutionality. But how can an agency rewrite a congressional statute to make it constitutional?….
Between 1877 and 1937 (between the formal end of Reconstruction and the formal constitutional ratification of the New Deal), the American system of governance was transformed with momentous implications for twentieth-century social and economic life. Nineteenth-century traditions of self-government and local citizenship were replacedby a modern approach to positive statecraft, individual rights, and social welfare very much with us today…. By “The Creation of the American Liberal State” I mean to suggest that the period from 1877 to 1937 was not just an “age of reform” or a “response to industrialism” or a “search for order” (Hofstadter 1955; Hays 1957; Wiebe 1967). Rather, it was an era marked by the specific and unambiguous emergence of a new regime of American governance — the modern liberal state…. the very origins of modern social-scientific inquiry in the United States were wholly coincident with and participatory in the construction of the new state-centered socio-economic policies of the progressive era…
The Progressive Discovery that Law Obstructs Politics
It is easy amid the rapid shifts in contemporary intellectual fashion to forget the long and pervasive hold of “progressive historiography” on American thought during the first half of the twentieth century (Hofstadter 1968; Benson 1960; Horwitz 1984). From the turn-of-the-century through the late New Deal, American political and economic development was interpreted primarily through the filter of intellectual categories developed in contests over progressive reform in the early twentieth century….
The confrontation between FDR’s New Deal legislation and Supreme Court constitutional review breathed new life into the progressive critique of law. In 1938… Benjamin Twiss began his Lawyers and the Constitution: How Laissez Faire Came to the Supreme Court (1942) as a direct response to the “revolution of 1937″ and as a direct attack on the “Four Horsemen” of anti-New Deal judicial apocalypse: Justices Van Devanter, McReynolds, Sutherland, and Butler. Twiss’s story about law and the New Deal re-deployed the stock figures and simple morals of a mature progressive historiography…
Behind the progressive mythology of negative laissez-faire constitutionalism lies an alternative story of law’s positive force in producing a modern state in America. And contrary to oddly influential European proclamations of the weakness and incompleteness of that state, the obvious empirical reality is that the story of the twentieth-century American state is about the creation of a most powerful geo-political entity. That entity, which has wielded staggering global influence in the twentieth century, was patently not the simple outgrowth of possessive individualism or the protection of private rights of property and contract or a governmental willingness to “leave alone.” It was the product of a continuous and energetic process of statebuilding…
“..the obvious empirical reality is that the story of the twentieth-century American state is about the creation of a most powerful geo-political entity… It was the product of a continuous and energetic process of statebuilding….”He leave out the tiny little fact that the USA was transformed into the British Empire’s Front Man and Cannon Fodder after the passage of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. We have been fighting Banker Wars ever since.
“All Wars Are Bankers Wars” (45 minutes)
One of the references cited in the above article is this 1938 book:
Court over Constitution: A study of judicial review as an instrument of popular government by Edward S. Corwin 1938.
I am not about to buy the book but I did find this thanks to Yandex. Brave only had one pointer. It was to “Good Reads’ with no info. Not even a review. 🤔
In trying to find more about that book I was led to:
It is noteworthy that whenever Marbury v. Madison is discussed in works on constitutional law, text books or case books, reference is invariably made to Alexander Hamilton’s discussion of judicial review in Federalist No. 78 as an early indication that the principle was regarded as a fundamental part of the system of government set up under the Constitution. Surprisingly, these works, almost without exception, fail to refer to the Antifederalist Letters of Brutus to which this number of the Federalist Papers constitutes a response. This is a regrettable omission since No. 78 cannot be properly understood except in the context of Brutus’ charge that the Constitution provided, not only for judicial review, but for judicial supremacy….
What concerned Brutus, in the first instance, was the use to which the court would apply judicial review in the service of national consolidation and how this would threaten the independence and survival of the states.👉The judicial power, Brutus warned, would operate to affirm and legitimate all the invasions of state power committed by the national legislature.👈 “The real effect of this system of government, will … be brought home to the feelings of the people, through the medium of the judicial power.”
….Brutus went on to point out another crucial distinction between the British and American systems of government – the ability of Parliament to severely restrict the broader impact of an unwarranted and inappropriate judicial interpretation of the constitution – a power entirely lacking to the U.S. Congress.
The supreme court then have a right, independent of the legislature, to give a construction to the constitution and every part of it, and there is no power provided in this system to correct their construction or do it away. If, therefore, the legislature pass any laws, inconsistent with the sense the judges put upon the constitution, they will declare it void; and therefore in this respect their power is superior to that of the legislature. In England the judges are not only subject to have their decisions set aside by the house of lords, for error, but in cases where they give an explanation to the laws or constitution of the country, contrary to the sense of the parliament, though the parliament will not set aside the judgment of the court, yet, they have authority, by a new law, to explain a former one, and by this means to prevent a reception of such decisions. But no such power is in the [U.S.] legislature. The judges are supreme-and no law, explanatory of the constitution, will be binding on them.
The end result was that,
(t]here is no power above them to controul any of their decisions. There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controuled by the laws of the legislature. In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven. Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel themselves independent of heaven itself.
Thus one can understand why George Soros targets judges and state attorneys general. People who fly under the radar of most people but who wield tremendous power.
On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed. — Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), letter to Judge William Johnson, (from Monticello, June 12, 1823)
If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. — George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796
Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.
I am going to again post the URL of another Constitutionalist, “Publius Huldah” the nom de guerre of Joanna Martin, J.D.
(1) Footnote: LINK to article about Victor Marchetti, former senior CIA official, who wrote a book exposing CIA deceptions. The CIA remove 399 passages, nearly a fifth of the book. That article defines ‘Limited Hangout’ thus:
Joe Biden never won. This is our Real President – 45, 46, 47.
AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.
This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).
Our various sister sites, listed in the Blogroll in the sidebar
Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.
Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.
We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.
Joe Biden didn’t win.
And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.
Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Week:
ingluvies
noun
a crop or craw of birds
a dilation or pouch in the esophagus of certain animals that receives food prior to the main stomach, esp a bird’s craw, or the first stomach of a cow or other ruminating animal
the widened portion of the esophagus of birds and lower animals
a crop or pouch in the esophagus of many birds, in which food is stored or partially digested before passing to the stomach
Used in a sentence with bad American English and Russian accent
“Moose ingluvies, but squirrel not having!”
Ridiculous misleading example of usage generated by bad AI
You don’t have to understand the math, to follow along and understand why light and atoms end up being a lot like vibrating musical strings.
Basically, Erwin Schrödinger plugged a simple but weird equation by Louis de Broglie, which said that matter has a frequency just like light, into the existing wave equation, and he got a matter wave equation.
And all of THAT is revealed on the way to answering, what in the heck is an imaginary number doing in there?
November 5, 2024 happened. It is time. God answered the prayers and groanings of His faithful as well as all MAGA supporters with an intervention. We start this story by going back in history to build the foundation. It was also a time of God’s intervention into human events.
Most people ignore or gloss over what transpired with the negotiations and collective agreement of the content that is stated in the Declaration of Independence. They acknowledge its importance, just do not really pay much attention to how it came to be. The vast majority of Americans are clueless as to its content and relevance to life in America today, nearly 250 years later.
Instead of spending time on discussing the Declaration’s content, I have posted a link below. As an American you owe it to yourself and your country to study the Declaration of Independence and Constitution as if your life on this planet depended upon it. Your children and grandchildren should be taught its content and importance; do not count on the schools to do so. If you are unfamiliar or need a reminder, please read it because my story is about some of the people who conceived, executed andrisked all for the contents of that critical document that led to the establishment of the United States of America.
What was the foundational concept of the Declaration? It was a Biblically inspired belief in the natural rights of mankind as expressed in the document itself. What was the background of the signers in regards to this belief system? From the following link,
“Of the 56 men who signed the Declaration, the great majority, perhaps all, identified themselves as Christians, and all but one were Protestants. Four were either present or former ministers, and a number of the signers were the sons of clergy. At least half of them had studied “divinity” at their various universities. The denominations breakdown runs as follows: 32 of the signers, well over half, were Episcopalians, or Anglicans, the old state Church of England. There were 13 Congregationalists, 12 were Presbyterians. There were two Quakers, two Unitarians, and one Roman Catholic.“
If that statement is correct and I have no reason to believe it is not, we can clearly determine that Biblical faith formed the basis of their world view as well as that of the future nation.
The ensuing implementation of the Declaration led to war, lost battles and this…
I hope you have reacquainted yourself with the document and the period in this brief tour of American history at its founding. I contend that it is that same American spirit that charges through the words of the Declaration of Independence that led to the greatest, ongoing experiment in national governance in world history. It is a spirit that is very much alive and expressed by the massive America First MAGA movement today, whose spirit is spreading like wildfire worldwide.
Not all of the 56 signers were present during the discussions and negotiations that surrounded the production of the document. They signed on anyway. They knew what was at stake and agreed in principle with the contents of the document. In this series we are going to dig down into understanding their roles and who many of them were as human beings. We need to personally identify with their commitment such that we may be emboldened to go and do likewise. This series will focus on many of these brave patriots.
Hint: They acted a lot like many America First MAGA patriots do today. Quite a few were from wealth and dignified. A handful were truly messed up people. Others were heroic and inspirational. Some were bombastic and others were pensive. A large number were highly educated and accomplished. Others were less educated, yet enlightened and committed to the cause. Blended together they gave us the foundational start for a truly blessed nation.
John Hancock
The signature of the first to execute it, John Hancock from Massachusetts, was the most flamboyant and recognizable of all. It reflected his popularity during that day. He was orphaned as a youth and adopted by a wealthy merchant uncle. He interned in the business, graduated from Harvard College at 17 and eventually inherited a vast wealth when his uncle died in 1763. The assets were said to be the largest in all of New England. Prior to the rise of the American patriots; that wealthy, elite standing would have placed him in the midst of the society of British loyalists in the colonies. However, John Hancock rejected that standing as time moved on and joined the independence movement. He was in the company of John and Samuel Adams, the latter being a political mentor, while becoming deeply involved in the republican movement in New England. In 1768, his sloop the Liberty was impounded by the British for allegedly carrying contraband. This accusation inspired a large group of local patriots to storm the customs post, burn the government’s boat and beat up its officers. The officers retreated to a British ship offshore. It was not long afterwards that Hancock helped lead and strongly support the Boston Tea Party.
When Peyton Randolph resigned from the Continental Congress in 1776, Hancock became President. England decreed a large reward for his capture and other patriot leaders later that year. Hancock’s comments upon signing the Declaration with large, easy to read handwriting were, “The British ministry can read that name without spectacles, let them double their reward.” One who had so much to lose, who could have easily gone along to get along; gave without reservation to America and his fellow patriots.
It was a big 🖕 you to the oppressors of the colonists. A spirit that has long prevailed in our nation.
What is not discussed much in historical accounts is all of the relationships, entanglements, misfortunes, twists and turns of the life of this as well as many other patriots. Some historians suggest Hancock was disappointed that Washington was given command of the Continental Army. Yet, we know that he held great respect for Washington and the two worked well together in the affairs of the young nation. What was true by this point was that his mentor from the early days, Samuel Adams, had soured on Hancock as he considered him vain and extravagant, unbecoming of a republican leader. Despite his wealth suffering from the war, Hancock always gave greatly to the poor and needy. He was generous to so many and the people idolized him.
His political career was a picture of ups and downs, as were his military leadership skills during the war. Yet, his reputation and support never really suffered for it. Throughout the war period he was loved and was elected governor of Massachusetts in 1780 with over 90% of the vote. He served terms there as well as being elected as a delegate to the Philadelphia Convention among other elected posts.
There have been many supporters and many detractors of Hancock that continued over the 2+ centuries that have followed; owed in large part because he did not leave much in the way of journals or letters for historians to use to make their assessments. Obviously, too much that has been stated about him came from information gained from his detractors as they were not shy in writing their commentaries (much like today). What he did have that could never be discarded or ignored was the overwhelming support of We the People (sound familiar?).
Despite his wealth and societal acceptance, he chose to give his all for America. He cast off the British crown and became an American patriot. Well before the war he had married into the politically prominent Quincy family with whom he had two children. He died in 1793 at 56 years old with his loyal wife, Dorothy, by his bedside. He had suffered from gout most of his life and it eventually led to his death. Even Samuel Adams, the acting Governor, reconciled to the greatness of the man as he led the efforts to provide a lavish funeral and declared its day a state holiday.
Guess Who?
Shall we step into the shoes of the next founding father?
You have lived a life of wealth and privilege as a 4th generation colonist with deep British roots. You are a graduate of Yale and have numerous real estate and business holdings that you received as inheritance. Your ancestors had immigrated to America and built the family’s business empire as loyal British subjects. Over the years as they passed away this led to you assuming control as an adult. You marry Mary Walton of the prominent merchant Walton family. You expand your family’s holdings and eventually become the 8th colonial governor of New Jersey. Local residents in one area even name a town after you. Life has been exceptionally good, but now you are faced with a difficult decision that will have lasting consequences on not only you and your family, but on your fellow colonists. The rulers of the colonies have ordered your vast property holdings and real estate development interests to be seized. However, they tell you that if you decline to vote for liberty that your holdings will be spared and life can go on as it has been. This is an offer that is extended as a courtesy due to your great grandfather and his brother having served with honor and high rank in Cromwell’s army in the English Civil War in the previous century; which eventually led to similar military involvement currently with a brother and half brother located in the colonies. They know your decision will be one of great influence on your fellow restless, angry colonists.
With all of this family history, work, and social standing you respond to the offer with, “There are plenty of homes but only one country.” To summarize – 🖕Brits.
It does not stop there. Your brother who is a General in the British army follows up and tells you not to not sign that document or you will lose everything. Your half-brother, Gouverneur Morris, does likewise even though he sides with the colonists. You hesitate after the safety of your family becomes a question. Once reassured by General Washington that they will be safe and it comes time to sign or walk away you respond with, “Damn the consequences. Give me the pen.” Once again – a big🖕Brits. Your family of a wife and ten children are driven into exile.
You then proceed to lose all of your property holdings and money in the exchange from the sacrifices of war.
Over time you become a hero and icon in the Revolutionary War and legislature that leads to your nation’s founding. You first give up your seat in the Continental Congress to your brother, Gouverneur, and become a General in the Continental Army under Washington. In 1777 you also return to roles in governance in the New York legislature and later become a county judge. After the war you return to your 2000 acre farm and begin the process of restoring what had been burned down by the Brits. Over time three of your sons join the military and become officers; a General, a Colonel and a Lieutenant. They later go on to serve with honor and distinction in the War of 1812.
You continue to serve your nation until your death in 1798 at age 71. Prior to your death in 1790 you offer your land as the site to house the U. S. Capital. It is now part of the South Bronx neighborhood known as Morrisania. Upon your death you are buried in the family vault on the property of St. Anne’s Church in the Bronx.
Your name is Lewis Morris of Bronx County, New York, a legendary American patriot.
Thomas Lynch, Jr.
I am sure some are asking, “Who?” Other than reading his signature on the document, most probably know very little about him. Yet, this young patriot contributed during a critical time in the lead up to the war in important ways that cannot be easily measured. His efforts had very little to do with military exploits on the battlefield. His gifts were of persuasion and concern for family and countrymen. He did his thing, after which, he disappeared.
Yes, there is more, a mixed bag like all of us. Privilege, good deeds and decisions, love, suffering, sorrow, poor decisions, and tragedy are in his story.
Thomas Lynch, Jr. was born in the Georgetown, SC area in 1749 on the Hopsewee Plantation his family owned. He was sent to England to study at Cambridge University, graduated and stayed to study law. After eight years away he returned home in 1772 and married Paige Shubrick, whom he courted prior to going to England. He was active in the family’s plantation operations as a planter, having no interest in going into law despite his education. He became politically engaged immediately as his father was a noted patriot in the independence movement who later signed on the Continental Association. His father had a serious stroke while serving in this role, so at age 26, young Lewis stepped in as a representative of the Continental Congress.
Upon his return to South Carolina and with independence in the wind, he was soon commissioned a captain and company commander in the South Carolina First Regiment under famous Col. Thomas Pinckney. He recruited men from his region to join the unit.
Unfortunately, while in his role with the regiment he soon fell ill from bilious fever (tick bite) before he could take full command of the unit he had recruited for the war effort. He never fully recovered. News soon came that his father’s health was again severely declining and he received permission to go to Philadelphia as a representative of the state where his father was serving in the Continental Congress. This led to him at age 27 to become the youngest signer on the Declaration of Independence as he stepped into his father’s role once again. While still there he made a fierce defense for the use of slaves on the plantations and threatened South Carolina’s secession if there were illegal attempts to end the practice. Later that year as he and his father made their way home, his father passed away from a second stroke.
Lynch stayed in South Carolina and lived with his wife at their Peachtree Plantation in the South Santee River area, one of three he owned. His health continued to be a lingering, serious problem. He and his wife took the advice of friends to relocate to Europe to see if a different environment might help. With the young nation still at war they could not leave through normal sea routes, so they chose to travel to the West Indies first. From there they planned to travel to Europe. They left for the destination on the brigantine, Polly, on December 17, 1779. They never arrived. The ship, crew and passengers were never heard from again. After becoming the youngest of the Declaration signers, at age 30, Thomas Lynch, Jr. became the youngest of the signers to die.
Lynch’s contributions beyond those stated above were his passion and ability to encourage others in the patriotic pursuit of independence. He was a brilliant orator and motivator of the people. He was aware of his impact on others and served as an inspiration to the people who knew him during the fight for independence.
Common Themes
Throughout this series you will note common themes. In this part and as will also be present in others; each of these colonists became American heroes at a critical juncture in our nation’s formation. These and many other signers first arrived on this planet from families that came from wealth and strongly rooted British backgrounds. They were privileged with strong educational training. They were disciplined in their pursuits. They had advantages that average colonists would never experience. However, this was important in the organization of the young nation. Their understanding of law, governance and industry while embracing the principles of natural rights, liberty and freedom would serve the needs of We the People well.
Yet, all three in this story as well as the other signers rejected the haughty attitudes of the Brits and loyalists with whom they had lived for so long and maintained relations. The interconnections from long held family relationships had proven very difficult to navigate. All three in this story chose a different path for themselves and their fellow colonists. They did so without reservation and remained faithful to the pursuit of freedom until death. Their devoted spouses were at their side when each passed away. The newly formed states of their origins proudly memorialized their contributions, which still affect the course of our nation today.
These were three American heroes who gave their all for their fellow Americans in the spirit of the words in the founding document they all signed in defiance of their oppressors. May we go and do likewise.
Thanks to Gail Combs for persisting with the writing of this article for the New Year 2025 post. Gail is having incredible difficulty, trying to publish from her computer – in my opinion more than just the usual WordPress crappiness. Again, IMO, it is most likely due to “plausible reasons” of subtle interference by enemies of her posting – whoever those may be. COUGH, COUGH, COUGH.
In any case, I have not changed anything in her article below. I did add a comma to Gail’s well-wish to you all above! Other than that, I have just added these few notes at the beginning, regarding the outgoing year, and the New Year.
The year 2024 AD (Year of our Lord) could have gone many ways other than the way it did. I am of the opinion that we should be incredibly thankful for the divine blessings and providence we were granted, including the life of our wonderful president, Donald J. Trump.
And then, on top of that near-miracle, President Trump WON – we kept the House – and we gained the Senate. WOW.
Be thankful. We are blessed. Trust in God. Praise God. Trust that the TRUTH will set us free.
May 2025 AD be a year in which we not only make America great – but a year in which we make God great, too.
Always remember that YOU have the power to make God great in YOUR life!
Peace and Blessings!
W
Rewriting History
by Gail Combs
This entire article is speculative. I am taking bits and pieces from various articles I have read and seeing if there is a common theme that can be informative. After all if the Cabal is rewriting history, it becomes very difficult to know what actually happened. Especially since they seem to have a habit of offing whistle-blowers and destroying evidence.
Well, the rewriting of history by the elite was what I originally planned to write about, however the ‘rabbit hole’ took a sharp left turn. I am going to address that branch of the rabbit hole in the next article. It was when I went to find the info linking John Maynard Keynes to the Fabians, that things went south. I pulled up some old 2014 notes and followed where they led. 🤔 However I still want to follow the rewriting history concept first as a basis for the next article.
Let’s start with George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four, published in 1949.
…The book’s hero, Winston Smith, is a minor party functionary living in a London that is still shattered by a nuclear war that took place not long after World War II. He belongs to the Outer Party, and his job is to rewrite history in the Ministry of Truth, bringing it in line with current political thinking…
Like John Maynard Keynes, Orwell was not formally a member of the Fabian Society. However his teacher and mentor was Aldous Huxley. Even Encyclopaedia Britannica mentions this. (I did not know John D. Rockefeller in 1900 “..bought Encyclopedia Britannica, acquiring control of a key source of information for readers worldwide.” LINKandLINK)
…The Fabian Society was founded as the political arm of the Fellowship of the New Life, an occult, socialist think tank founded in 1883. The Fellowship was home to many influential figures, including the UK’s first Labour Party Prime Minister and Karl Marx’s daughter, Eleanor. The Fabian Society has been dominant in both British and global politics for over a century. It founded numerous influential organizations, such as the London School of Economics (1895) and the British Labour Party (1900). Fabians were instrumental in the creation of the United Nations and the entire postwar world order itself. Aldous Huxley’s brother Julian, for example, was the first director of UNESCO. He also coined the term “transhumanism” in his book ‘New Bottles for New Wine’ (1950).
The Fabians’ political aim is — or was, since their objectives have already been achieved to a large degree — the creation of a one-world Socialist government, ruled by a technocratic elite that micromanages every aspect of our lives, including our biology (via transhumanism). However, their ultimate goal is the total alchemical reconfiguration of humanity: They aim to break down the unwashed masses of the world and remold them into an entirely new breed of man — a new species of human, even.
This is not to say that all Globalists are literally Fabians, but that the ideas laid out by Fabian Socialists appear to be the most accurate description of where Globalists aim to take their world empire.
“ My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World. […] Within the next generation I believe that the world’s rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitudeas by flogging and kicking them into obedience.” – Aldous Huxley (emphasis added)
“…infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis….” Boy talk about prophetic, or is it knowledge of the actual plan?
Aldous Huxley’s Prophetic Insights on Technology, Freedom, and Propaganda in a 1958 Interview with Mike Wallace. Aldous Huxley lived in CA at the time and in my opinion, he lied his head off in this interview.
part 1 (10 min)
Part 2 (10 min)
Part 3 (9 min)
Video about Aldous Huxley and mescaline experiments (2 min)
Humphry Osmond (1917-2004) was the British psychiatrist who coined the word “psychedelic” – “mind manifesting” – in a letter to Aldous Huxley. Osmond publicized the term at a meeting of the New York Academy of Sciences in 1957. “Psychedelic” is perhaps better term than “hallucinogen” since many classic psychedelic agents do not typically induce hallucinations.
Osmond introduced Aldous Huxley to mescaline in May 1953. Huxley sent Osmond a rhyme containing his own suggested coinage: “To make this trivial world sublime, take half a gram of phanerothyme.” [Thymos (Gr): soul]. Osmond demurred: “To fathom Hell or soar angelic, just take a pinch of psychedelic.” LINK
Aldous Huxley, George Orwell & The Fabian Society (1 minute)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
When talking of rewriting history, we are talking about a group of very wealthy people capable of long range planning with a single goal in mind. By long range I mean over one hundred years and probably a lot more. These people think in terms of family dynasties like the Rothschild and Rockefeller dynasties.
“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, ARE AFRAID OF SOMETHING. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
…Where do we find this evidence? The first place to look is in history. The past is the key to the present, and we can never fully understand where we are today unless we know what path we traveled to get here. It was Will Durant who said: “Those who know nothing about history are doomed forever to repeat it.” …
THE HIDDEN AGENDA
…the year 1954 and, suddenly, we find ourselves in the plush offices of the Ford Foundation in New York City. There are two men seated at a large, Mahogany desk, and they are talking. They cannot see or hear us, but we can see them very well. One of these men is Rowan Gaither, who was the 3 President of the Ford Foundation at that time. The other is Mr. Norman Dodd, the chief investigator for what was called the Reece Committee, which was a Congressional committee to investigate tax-exempt foundations. The Ford Foundation was one of those, so he is there as part of his Congressional responsibilities. In 1982, I met Mr. Dodd in his home state of Virginia where, at the time, I had a television crew gathering interviews for a documentary film. I previously had read his testimony and realized how important it was; so, when our crew had open time, I called him on the telephone and asked if he would be willing to make a statement before our cameras, and he said, “Of course.” I’m glad we obtained the interview when we did, because Dodd was advanced in years, and it wasn’t long afterward that he passed away.
We were very fortunate to capture his story in his own words. What we are about to witness from our time machine was confirmed in minute detail twenty years later and preserved on video. The reason for Dodd’s investigation was that the American public had become alarmed by reports that large tax-exempt foundations were promoting the ideologies of Communism and Fascism and advocating the elimination of the United States as a sovereign nation. As far back as the 1930s, William Randolph Hearst had written a series of blistering editorials in his national chain of newspapers in which he cited Carnegie Foundation publications that spouted Communist slogans identical to what was coming from the Communist Party itself. When the Carnegie Endowment published an article written by Joseph Stalin attacking Capitalism and praising Communism, Hearst called it “propaganda, pure and simple.”….
This is very crucial because of what Mr Griffin says later.
A STRATEGY TO CONTROL THE TEACHING OF HISTORY
The question that arises in Mr. Dodd’s mind is: How would it be possible for anyone to think they could alter life in the United States so it could be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union and, by implication, with other nations of the world? What an absurd thought that would be – especially in 1954…
The answer was provided by the Carnegie Endowment Fund for International Peace, the same group that had been the center of controversy in the 1930s. When Dodd visited that organization and began asking about their activities, the President said, “Mr. Dodd, you have a lot of questions. It would be very tedious and time consuming for us to answer them all, so I have a counter proposal…
This is what those minutes revealed: From the very beginning, the members of the board discussed how to alter life in the United States; how to change the attitudes of Americans to give up their traditional principles and concepts of government and be more receptive to what they call the collectivist model of society…
At the Carnegie Foundation board meetings, they discussed this question in a scholarly fashion. After months of deliberation, they came to the conclusion that, out of all of the options available for altering political and social attitudes, there was only one that was historically dependable. That option was war. In times of war, they reasoned, only then would people be willing to give up things they cherish in return for the desperate need and desire for security against a deadly enemy. And so the Carnegie Endowment Fund for International Peace declared in its minutes that it must do whatever it can to bring the United States into war. They also said there were other actions needed, and these were their exact words: “We must control education in the United States.” They realized that was a pretty big order, so they teamed up with the Rockefeller Foundation and the Guggenheim Foundation to pool their financial resources to control education in America – in particular, to control the teaching of history. They assigned those areas of responsibility that involved issues relating to domestic affairs to the Rockefeller Foundation, and those issues relating to international affairs were taken on as the responsibility of the Carnegie Endowment. Their first goal was to rewrite the history books, and they discussed at great length how to do that. They approached some of the more prominenthistorians of the time and presented to them the proposal that they rewrite history to favor the concept of collectivism, but they were turned down flat. Then they decided – and, again, these are their own words, “We must create our own stable of historians.” They selected twenty candidates at the university level who were seeking doctorates in American History. Then they went to the Guggenheim Foundation and said, “Would you grant fellowships to candidates selected by us, who are of the right frame of mind, those who see the value of collectivism as we do? Would you help them to obtain their doctorates so we can then propel them into positions of prominence and leadership in the academic world?” And the answer was “Yes.” So they gathered a list of young men who were seeking their doctorate degrees. They interviewed them, analyzed their attitudes, and chose the twenty they thought were best suited for their purpose. They sent them to London for a briefing. (In a moment I will explain why London is so significant.) At this meeting, they were told what would be expected if and when they win the doctorates they were seeking. They were told they would have to view history, write history, and teach history from the perspective that collectivism was a positive force in the world and was the wave of the future….
… Over the last quarter-century, historians have by and large ceased writing about the role of ruling elites in the country’s evolution. Or if they have taken up the subject, they have done so to argue against its salience for grasping the essentials of American political history. Yet there is something peculiar about this recent intellectual aversion, even if we accept as true the beliefs that democracy, social mobility, and economic dynamism have long inhibited the congealing of a ruling stratum. This aversion has coincided, after all, with one of the largest and fastest-growing disparities in the division of income and wealth in American history….
Neglecting the powerful had not been characteristic of historical work before World War II. ”
An example of the re-writing to remove anti-communism evidence.
…do most people know the link of cultural Marxism, in particular its strategy of the “long march through the institutions,” to another socialist society famed for its “gradualism” and its connection to the British Labour Party? This society is called the Fabian Society and heavily influenced, indeed was a precursor to, the creation of the Frankfurt School.
…In 1905, American Fabians established the Rand School of Social Science in New York City and incorporated the Intercollegiate Socialist Society to promote “an intelligent interest in socialism among college men and women.” A founding member was American Fabian John Dewey, considered the father of progressive education, and an atheist, socialist, and evolutionist. In 1921 the Fabian Rand School changed its name to “The League for Industrial Democracy” and established a network of 125 chapters with the aim of de-Christianising America. Dewey became president of it in 1941. Dewey also co-founded the New School for Social Research (NSSR) in 1919, which is a Fabian-socialist institution that is the American equivalent to LSE. This school, funded by the Rockefeller Foundation ($208,100 between 1940 and 1944) and the Carnegie Corporation ($95,000 in 1940) among others, set up the Graduate Faculty on Political and Social Science in 1933, called the “University in Exile,” and aimed to “accommodate the large number of socialist intellectuals” who fled or were expelled from Hitler’s Germany…
Bill Moyers, Ted Turner, Bill Gates Sr, David Rockefeller, Richard D Parsons Judy Woodruff, Anthony Fauci, Tom Brokaw, George Soros, Mamphela Ramphele, Barbara Walters, David McCullough, Irene Diamond, Keonore Annenberg, Brooke Astor at the Carnegie Medal of Philanthropy 2001
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Going further back in time we come to the PrussiaGate series by Will Zoll, a team of two writers. The series is on a paid subscription substack but Patrick Gunnels reads them on Epic Threads. Zoll lays out an interesting hypothesis and backs it up with historical information. https://rumble.com/search/video?q=pgunnels%20Prussiagate (Skip the first 10 minutes which is intro.)
Marburg: The Four Horseman, the Marburg Files, Snow White and Revolution – A Prussian Dream: Start @ 28:50 This is very interesting given the Good vs EVIL battle we are currently in.
A short free article by Will Zoll on the same topic.
Finally going back centuries in history, we have a series by another Badlands associate. Given the time frame this is very speculative. However he brings up some interesting ideas and some nuggets of fact. He is also wrong about other things.
…I’ve become more and more convinced over the years that mainstream history is a hypnotic spell. I frankly wonder if ANY of what we were told in school was true.
The same dark cabal that runs the Deep State today has likely been messing with our history for centuries—what we want to know is how and for what purpose.
99% of our job as Digital Soldiers is simply to know what’s going on!….
…many people generally don’t understand that an informed minority ALMOST ALWAYS defeats an uninformed majority in any information-based conflict/war….
American Hypnotist then gets into the psychology of the Cabal.
The Mindset of Evil
What is the “platonic form” of evil?
In my opinion, evil can be best described as unbounded parasitism.
Allow me to explain …
Seen from a “Darwinist” perspective, life itself is nothing more than a non-stop struggle for “domination”. I call this the eternal power struggleworldview. This is, indeed, the central belief of Marxism; it’s also the worldview that all psychopaths share on some level.
Power struggles are indeed a part of life, but the key difference between the perspective of psychopaths and non-psychopaths is that your average human being doesn’t define the entirety of existence by such power struggles (unless they’ve been trained to look at things in such away by a psychopathic education system/media complex/culture/family environment… but I digress). Either way, many people DO see things that way, and they’re living their lives accordingly.
The most intelligent of such people are quite capable of hiding their manipulative ploys behind a well-crafted façade. Sometimes, such people form “alliances” with each other.
Do you see where I’m going with this?
This mentality is one of the key factors driving the Deep State. It acts as a powerful unifier for all the slavers and dark occultists of the world in their quest to parasitize mankind as much as possible….
…brilliant psychologist, Andrew Lobaczewski, author ofPolitical Ponerology: the Science of Evil, had many up close encounters with psychopathic personality types as well, for he was an escapee from communist Poland. According to him, psychopaths feel oppressed by the common morality of the people, simply because they see no reason for it—they often quite literally see themselves as a “more evolved” version of humanity, because they’re “unburdened” by the “silly” moral considerations of normal folk.
Psychopathic personality types often deeply wish to take revenge out on the populace whose morality prevents them from pursuing the satisfaction of their appetites without impediment.[Think Pedophilia and cannabilism – GC]
…one of the driving features of the psychopathic personality type is the INABILITY to achieve satisfaction…
After defining psychopath/parasites he goes on to the Werewolf Game. Note it is a RUSSIAN who comes up with the concept for this game. A game that teaches how to analyze people.
…When it comes to an information war, oftentimes it’s the most innocent seeming “comms” that tell us the most—fairy tales and mythology almost certainly contain more clues than people tend to think. The very archetype of the Werewolf may indeed come from an ancient death cult that appears to have its origins in the Western Russia/Ukraine region. This cult was sometimes known as the “Koryos”, and they’d go on killing sprees under every full moon, usually wearing wolf-pelts on their heads.
Are you starting to see why I believe there’s something very profound going on here with the Werewolf Game? ..
That he brings up fairy tales is interesting because Will Zoll also points out the importance of the old fairy tales. See the Gunnels VIDEO above Prussiagate Files: Marburg, Snow White, Brothers Grimm starting at 40 minutes.
…Did you know that the Black Sea has almost no oxygen in it? Not only that, but it glows red, and contains high levels of sulphur. Alas, the smell of sulphur is popularly associated with the presence of demons…
AND
Now, my first piece of evidence supporting the idea that hell is real comes from the research of Dr. Jerry Marzinski, a brave man who spent many decades as a therapist working with schizophrenic patients in maximum security prisons. After many years of working with these patients, he concluded that the voices schizophrenics hear in their minds are NOT hallucinations, but rather demonic entities who “infest” human beings.
According to his experience, these entities do this because they feed on negative emotions. Literally, they are hungry, and cannot produce their own energy—ergo, they need ours to “survive”.
Marzinski discovered, among other things, thatthe voices inevitably get VERY mad when you correctly identify their parasitic nature.Much like how a garden-variety narcissist or psychopath will react when you wise up to the games they play.
Alas, there is no profit in curing schizophrenia for the drug companies, and this is why you aren’t going to see any mainstream publications talk about Marzinski’s work.
Among other things, Marzinsky discovered that reciting Psalms 23 agitates the voices and makes them run away—he taught his patients to recite it until he was “found out” and told by the authorities that the only allowable method of “treatment” was to continue giving his patients drugs.
THAT certainly puts another twist on why the Cabal is adamant about pushing Russia out of that area and why Putin insists the Cabal is satanic.
…Whether it sounds plausible or not, the fact of the matter is that werewolf, vampire and zombie symbolism holds many keys to understanding the mindset of the Deep State death cult.
This cult is indeed a predator class that goes to great lengths to visit untold violence and torture upon innocent people. Pardon my candor, but if you want to be more than mere food for anything that eats you, then the onus is on you to become aware of predators in your midst….
There once was a time when “fairy tales” were used as a teaching tool to warn people about psychopathic personality types and the cults that such types create. Nowadays, many stories are told to accomplish the very opposite effect.
The “misunderstood psychopath” has become a trope in mainstream entertainment…..
…going all the way back to 3,000-2,000 BC, there existed a cult that had its home base right where Ukraine stands today, and which used the “wolf” as its main “theme”. This cult was known by many names, including but not limited to the Koryos and the Are-ans (due to worshipping a deity named “Ares”, which looks an awful lot like the words “Aryan” and “Aries”, if I do say so myself)….
From ancient times up until the year 1,000 AD, the Koryos would ride into Asia and Europe, marauding their more peaceful, agrarian neighbors—like many psychopathic types, they didn’t produce anything themselves, instead preferring to do drugs for half the year, in between raids.They’d go into a “berserk” trance under the full moon, and wore wolf pelts on their heads as they pillaged everything and everyone around them.
It would be a mistake to think that this cult disappeared centuries ago.
Among other places, the symbolism of this cult can be seen in the coat of arms for the Fabian Society, a prominent British socialist organization that officially formed in 1900, and that had a hand in the formation of the League of Nations (1919). Their membership included Walter Lippman, whose 1927 book Public Opinion goes into detail regarding the elites plans to use “democracy” as a smokescreen to mentally control the masses whilst convincing the masses that they are free…
Fabian Society’s coat of arms:
Rather blatant, isn’t it?
As we discussed in the previous article, psychopaths are “two faced”—That is to say, they wear a mask to blend in with normal society—indeed, most of us would become very skilled actors if we practiced the art of manipulation all day, every day, like psychopaths do. The symbolism here is important, because when we’re dealing with the dark occult practicing elites, we are indeed dealing with people who keep their “inner monster” hidden, and who also engage in ritualistic, cult violence…
… The ancient kingdom of Khazaria was also said to hail from this area, and there’s a tremendous amount of evidence that Khazaria and the werewolf cult are deeply connected. Khazaria was said to have pioneered horseback warfare, traveling in nomadic tribes, marauding nearby villages…
[The Author points to another tidbit I was not aware of. GC]
“For centuries, [the cult] got used to stuffing their stomachs with human flesh and their pockets with money. But they must realize that this ‘ball of vampires’ is coming to an end.”
When Putin calls them “vampires”, I’m certain he’s talking about one and the same cult that I’ve been talking about, which is likely the same cult that is variously called the Illuminati, the NWO, Satanists, Luciferians, the Babylonian Brotherhood, etc. by popular culture….
This author maybe doing a bit of a stretch in some areas. I certainly have problems with some of his ideas, but there is this:
“Sviatoslav’s Council of War,” by Boris Chorikov, 1836. Around the year 965, after centuries of traveling merchants being ambushed and murdered by cut-throats in the modern-day nation of Ukraine, an alliance was formed between Christians and Muslims. Led by the [Kievan-Rus] Grand Prince of Kiev, Sviatoslav I, the proto-Russians fought alongside the Byzantines and the Turks (all former enemies) to destroy the Khazarian Empire, which had rejected all three Abrahamic religions, instead practicing the profane art of blood magic from ancient Babylon, worshiping the satanic deity, Ba’al. Defeating this existential threat required an alliance of old sworn enemies. (They had all previously failed on their own.)
1050 years ago, in the summer of 965, the great Russian prince Svyatoslav Igorevich defeated the Khazar army and took the capital of the Khazar Kaganate, Itil. The lightning strike of the Russian troops with the support of the Allied Pechenegs led to the collapse of the parasitic Khazar state. Russ committed a sacred revenge, destroying the Khazar “snake”…
Khazar threat
The fight against the parasitic state of the Khazars was the most important strategic task of Russia. The trade and usurious elite of Khazaria, who subjugated the Khazar tribal military nobility, held in their hands all the exits from Eastern Europe to the East. The Khazar state received huge profits by controlling transit routes.
The Khazar Khaganate represented a serious military threat to Russia. Archaeologists have discovered a whole system of stone fortresses on the right bank of the Don, North Donets and Oskol. One white-stone stronghold was located at a distance of 10-20 kilometers from the other. The outposts were located on the right, western and northwestern banks of the rivers. An important role in the construction of these fortresses was played by Byzantine engineers. So, Sarkel (Belaya Vezha) on the bank of the Don was built by Byzantine engineers led by Petron Kamatir. Yes, and strengthened Itil Byzantines-Romans. The Khazar state played an important role in the military-political strategy of Constantinople, holding back Russia….
The Khazars made campaigns and raids in the Slavic-Russian lands. Arab geographer Al-Idrisi reported that Khazar vassals regularly made raids on the Slavs, in order to steal people for sale into slavery. These were not just spontaneous raids, from time to time, but a deliberate predatory strategy on the part of the parasite state. In the Khazar state, the power was seized by the Jews representing the caste of rakhdonites (radanity). This caste of international traders controlled trade between East and West, including the Silk Road and other communications. Their influence extended all the way to China and India. One of their main “goods” were people. The slave clan worshiped the “golden calf” and measured everything in gold.…
Certainly makes you wonder what history Putin has access to. To bad Tucker Carlson cut him off.
Next week I will get into the rabbithole I discovered when looking for the John Maynard Keynes Fabian connection.
Joe Biden never won. This is our Real President – 45, 46, 47.
AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.
This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).
Joe Biden never won. This is our Real President – 45, 46, 47.
AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.
This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).
Our various sister sites, listed in the Blogroll in the sidebar
Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.
Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.
We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.
Joe Biden didn’t win.
And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.
Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Week:
vicegerent
noun
acting in place of another
having delegated authority
not the same as a viceregent, although similar
Used in a sentence
A viceregent is a ruler acting in place of a monarch, while a vicegerent is an appointed representative of a higher authority, often with broader administrative duties.
Now I seem to recall Rand Paul’s name associated with Festivus, and I never quite got it, until this news report. Stay with it for at least a minute. LMAO!!!
Well, DOGE-GONE, it’s BARBIE!
I’m sorry, but Festivus has me in the mood to play my favorite song!
In case you’re wondering what a “ferrocell” is, there’s a fascinating paper describing how one works.
The beauty of this song – other than simply being well-done, is that in some pleasing ways, the actual science of sunlight shining on the orbiting moon, blocked by its own orbiting mass, corresponds with, and maybe even transforms through the “crackpot matrix” to, the dithering of Mr. (at)witsit about ferrocells and whatnot.
Between “real” science and “pseudo” science, I’m falling in love with the crazy beauty of this universe!
Good night, good morning, good day, and MERRY CHRISTMAS!
