“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
When did POTUS make the statement “Calm Before the Storm?” When was HUBER activated by SESSIONS? Who was/is assigned to HUBER? ACTING AG PRIMARY PURPOSE? SCARAMUCCI MODEL? PUBLIC OPINION (OPTICS) DO NOT MATTER. What was leaked today (on purpose?)? https://twitter.com/johnrobertsFox/status/1070749777334292481 HUBER to testify re: Clinton Foundation? HUBER to reveal ‘active’ probe actively underway into organization? OIG to release report #2 [overview indicating many ‘potentially criminal referrals’ made]? “We do not discuss active/ongoing DOJ / FBI investigations.” MIL INTEL FISA THE WORLD IS WATCHING. Q
Q Post 2561
.@realDonaldTrump wants to nominate William Barr to be the next Attorney-General. Barr served as Attorney-General during the Bush 41 presidency. While POTUS normally likes to surround himself with people he knows and likes, he doesn't know Barr, but Barr commands immense respect
I was originally going to entitle this post something else – something cuter and more grandiose about “my life-long sword-fight with Occam’s razor“. Hence the opening image. However, that goal was WAY too big for a blog post. I could literally write a book on it.
The fact is, I have MANY issues with Occam’s razor in science and other forms of investigation, and most of them don’t deal with deception. They deal with progress in science, more than anything else. Although the modern intrusions of leftist deception politics into science are changing that balance very rapidly.
Some scientists tend to shave too closely with Occam’s razor. Nothing grows. There is no imagination – no progress. It is easier to sit tight on a small set of highly validated principles, and not reach out to try something new.
Others don’t shave at all, and “fluffy” no-way-in-hell theory grows with abandon. Such theories approach the ad hoc nature that Occam’s razor was specifically intended to prevent. Instead of angels on pinheads, embarrassing numbers of never-to-be-found particles and whatnot are predicted, proposed, or just rumored.
Those are big topics. Addressing all of that, plus the use of Occam’s razor for deception, would be a tall order. Best left for our wonderful commenters, already discussing these things just on the rumor of my finally posting this piece.
While sleeping on this post (earlier), I realized that I needed to keep things simple, and ONLY talk about how Occam’s razor behaves under deception. Thus, I came up with a much simpler and more powerful statement of the principle at hand. Then, I decided to pound that statement into people’s heads, by repeating it, over and over.
Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.
Wolf Moon
Actually, that’s not giving credit where credit is due.
Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.
Anonymous author of KGB-CIA manual read by various people Wolf Moon has known
Actually, that’s not big enough. It needs to be a nice big headline.
Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.
There. That’s better! And THAT is why I changed the title. If I’m going to repeat a headline over and over, why not just make it the title, too? That way people won’t have to dig for it. The conclusion is RIGHT THERE. To review for the big picture, people don’t even have to re-read this post.
Now, I can’t tell you ALL of the reasons why I believe this, but my motto serves as a kind of proof that the opening image and would-be title are justified – that I’ve had to FIGHT Occam’s razor all my life. Indeed, I chose my motto carefully, after years of fighting my way up from a state of blissful ignorance, to one of satisfied but battle-scarred awareness.
It is better to be right than to be believed.
Wolf Moon
Being right does not come easily in this world, because DECEPTION is everywhere. And deception is everywhere for a beautiful reason, which a better understanding of OCCAM’S RAZOR makes clear:
Occam’s razor is a protector of deception.
Yeah. You’re going to hear that a LOT of things linking Occam’s razor not with FINDING truth, but rather with HIDING truth.
So what the hell IS Occam’s razor? Other than a tool of deception?
OK – that’s not really Occam’s razor. This is more like it.
When we are faced with more than one hypothesis that explains the data equally well, we choose the simpler explanation.
Occam’s razor
Now, the fact that many CORRECT answers ARE complex, and so many simple ones fail, or at least it sure SEEMS that way, makes the following cartoon funny.
We see in the cartoon an idea that LOOKS like Occam’s razor because it deals with simple versus complex, but also seems to say the opposite. Yet the cartoon seems to say something intuitively obvious and wearily true – that many answers are simple but wrong, and the fewer that ARE correct, are generally complicated.
This seems at first to be at odds with Occam’s razor, but it’s not – because it’s NOT Occam’s razor, nor is it a derivative thereof. It just looks like Occam’s razor. Stop for a moment and think about that. The cartoon is talking about the fact that it sure seems to us humans that REAL answers tend to be few and complex – while too-simple and WRONG answers seem to abound. That is MUCH DIFFERENT from saying that for TWO OR MORE theories that explain the same set of facts, the SIMPLEST theory tends to be correct.
In fact, if you CONFUSE these two principles, then you have just seen why
Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.
That is worth an explanation. You see, there is an old saw about simple versus complex. It’s called Occam’s razor. When people talk about simple versus complex, they ALMOST ALWAYS cite Occam’s razor. So if a person does a cartoon about simple versus complex, and they say something that seems to be both TRUE and the OPPOSITE of Occam’s razor, it looks like a paradox – like Occam’s razor is “wrong or something”.
Well, it’s the “or something”. The cartoon has successfully, without trying very hard, mimicked Occam’s razor. And MIMICRY is a form of DECEPTION. You were led into a mistake by a cartoon.
Thus, in a very ironic way, the ubiquity of Occam’s razor ITSELF was used to deceive. The SIMPLEST answer – “a person talking about simple versus complex is talking about Occam’s razor” – was used to deceive you, and then lead you past deception to paradox, at which point you do a “WTF” and laughed.
Now – there are MANY WAYS to express the principles underlying the fact that
Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.
One of the simplest is the one that our own wheatietoo uses all the time. This is the idea that
Occam’s razor can fail when you don’t have all the information.
And if somebody WANTS it to fail for you, this is WHY
Occam’s razor is a tool of deception.
As an example, let’s consider the “Bigfoot” example above.
“A hairy creature in the woods is more likely a bear than Bigfoot.” -Occam’s Razor
If you see an upright, bipedal, very hairy creature in the woods, you have almost certainly seen a BEAR. We have an ordinary explanation. No need to state anything fancy. THAT is Occam’s razor, right there.
But what if the “hairy creature in the woods” had a flat face and no snout – basically a hominid face – and this was seen with extreme clarity, so there is almost no possibility for error? If that is the case, then the simple explanation of a bear goes out the window. There is the possibility of a highly deformed or accidentally de-snouted bear, but such a thing will not live long in the wild. A truly flat-faced bear is pretty much DOA at birth. HOWEVER, we can switch to the SIMPLER theory that it’s a GORILLA – possibly escaped from a zoo – and we have basically been rescued by Occam’s razor.
But let’s not stop there. Let’s say that the thing was seen with extreme clarity. The witness KNOWS what a gorilla looks like, and it was NOT a gorilla. Let’s say that we have a clear enough view of it that it looks exactly like “Bigfoot”.
Now – we can believe two things here.
It was a “real” Bigfoot.
It was somebody in a Bigfoot suit, DECEIVING US.
Which one of these alternatives is the one favored by Occam’s razor? That is actually a very good question. To an honest naturalist in the woods of Washington or Oregon in 1910, when “cryptozoology” was still somewhat possible, a “real” animal of some sort would have seemed more likely. The idea of somebody using a suit to deceive a naturalist would have sounded fantastic, and would require far more explanation than a new species of animal.
But in 2010, with many more “Bigfoot costumes” in existence than reported visual sightings of Bigfoot in all of history, the prediction FLIPS, because we have NEW INFORMATION. We have to allow for DECEPTION as a kind of additional information.
BIGFOOT DECEPTION is now ORDINARY. BIGFOOT REALITY remains rather EXTRAORDINARY.
Now – what if you’re a modern person, but your knowledge is like that of a naturalist in 1910? What if you are not AWARE of what deceptions are POSSIBLE? In that case you will use Occam’s razor on the WRONG DATA SET. You will be DECEIVED, and Occam’s razor, operating on insufficient data, will AID THE DECEPTION.
This is how magic works, folks. The SIMPLE and OBVIOUS explanation is WRONG. Hidden complexity is used to FOOL YOU. YOU don’t have all the information. By HIDING information, you are led to USE Occam’s razor with too little information, and come to the wrong conclusion.
Now with magic, we know we are being fooled. But then again, nobody has to TELL YOU that you are experiencing a magic show.
Welcome to DISINFORMATION.
And this is the most important part. It doesn’t have to be something extraordinary like Bigfoot. I could just be trying to convince you of an ordinary fact. That is not true.
Let me repeat that. If I try to convince you of an OBVIOUS, SIMPLE NON-EXTRAORDINARY THING, but it’s really a complicated, deceptive story that benefits me, Occam’s razor just turned into MY advantage, and MY survival tool.
Two words.
Insect mimicry.
The simple explanation is that it’s a THORN. It’s not. It’s a LEAF-HOPPER.
The simple explanation is that it’s a LEAF. It’s not. It’s a BUTTERFLY.
The simple explanation is that it’s a BEE. It’s not. It’s a FLY.
The simple explanation is that it’s LICHEN. It’s not. It’s a MOTH.
The simple explanation is that it’s a FLOWER PETAL. It’s not. It’s a SPIDER / MANTIS / ASSASSIN BUG.
If you look MORE CLOSELY at any one of these, you get MORE INFORMATION, and go “OH SHIT, LOOK AT THAT!” and see the coolness of the DECEPTION. What has happened is that MORE INFORMATION changed the output of Occam’s razor. You now have MORE FACTS.
One might say that:
Occam’s razor is dependent upon the observer, whereas truth is not.
Now – back to an explanation of Occam’s razor which deals with “ordinary” versus “extraordinary”:
One has to be very careful here. ORDINARY and EXTRAORDINARY are likely to flip back and forth as FACTS BECOME KNOWN, as our EXPERIENCE with those facts increases, and as the validity of those facts CHANGES.
BLACK HOLES were at one time EXTRAORDINARY. Now they are NOT.
Relativistic effects in general were at one time EXTRAORDINARY. Now they are NOT.
Atomic energy was at one time EXTRAORDINARY. Now it is NOT.
Talking to somebody on the other side of the world was once EXTRAORDINARY. Now it is ORDINARY.
Aluminum was at one time EXTRAORDINARY and PRECIOUS. Now it is COMMON and can be used for TIN FOIL HATS.
There is a reason the INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES try to stay ahead of the curve, BUELLER. It is so THEY have all the FACTS and YOU DON’T.
Are you starting to see the picture now?
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER WHEN THE OTHER PERSON DOESN’T HAVE IT.
In other words, it’s not really knowledge that is power. It’s a DIFFERENTIAL in knowledge that is power.
Now – put this in reality terms. This point about Ordinary vs. Extraordinary is very important for assisting DECEPTION. If I can HIDE the formerly extraordinary as MY ordinary, I can almost guarantee that the SUCKER will pick the known ORDINARY explanation. But if I LOSE the SECRET of my extraordinary, it becomes the TARGET’S ordinary, and they are no longer fooled.
WELCOME TO MY WORLD.
Now – even in deception, Occam’s razor still operates. If you have all the information, and there are two ways you can be fooled, the SIMPLER ONE is probably the RIGHT ONE.
If you are being deceived about ORDINARY STUFF and there are competing ORDINARY EXPLANATIONS, you are very likely to MISS EVERYTHING. The same goes for TWO COMPETING EXTRAORDINARY EXPLANATIONS. If there is deception, you can use Occam’s razor to pick the wrong one, by picking the SIMPLER of the two, if you don’t know all the facts.
And THAT is where we are led into one of the most EXTRAORDINARY events in modern history.
Next time, in:
9/11: From Believer to Skeptic
See you then!
W
“History is a great teacher, but she makes us do a LOT of homework.”
This SPECIAL (D5 + 1) = (D13 – 7) LOGICAL THINKING Thursday open thread is VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA world.
Say what you want, comment on what other people said, comment on people’s comments. Keep it civil. Treehouse rules, but expect lots of QAnon.
No illegalities, please! Hoaxing, Framing, Lying Progzis and Illogical NeverTrump BEGONE.
Today (Thursday, December 6) will be the fourth day of Hanukkah, and the fifth day of Advent.
The content creator behind this video (you really need to see more of them) is creating some of the absolute best WAKE THE FXXX UP psychological propaganda I have ever seen.
It IS propaganda – heavy, emotion-laden, driving, cultural Marxist music – and it is pointed straight back with STUNNING precision at the very same people who have advanced cultural Marxism into and against our society.
Watch it, and you’re AWAKE AGAIN.
There is no way Deep State survives this. These creeps could drop NUKES on us under any guise, and it will be blamed on them, making socialism the next cannibalism for the next 100,000 years.
Just go to your jail cells. There is no point. The Orwellian “#Resistance” is useless. International socialism and all its fake, puppet, front, and deceiver forms are DOA.
But they won’t stop, so just keep their fingers off their false flag triggers, lock ’em up, get ’em into court, find the truth, pass the sentences, and GIT ‘EM INTO GITMO.
Watching the comments on this Twitter thread was fascinating. All of those liberals saying that Flynn had “flipped” on Trump.
And yet, there was a certain hesitation in their tone. Less certainty than usual.
Yeah. Now they have a value for Flynn. Zero. But they don’t have a number for Trump.
I do.
The zero property. 0 + 0 = 0.
Flynn’s ZERO and Trump’s ZERO add up to a BIG, FAT ZERO.
Now – I’m not so sure that Mueller won’t try to say that the FIRST zero and the SECOND zero are different. His JOB – his Comey-to-Rosenstein hand-off JOB was to say that TRUMP’S number isn’t zero. That it’s something else. To FIND something or CREATE something.
Unfortunately for Mueller, there is a problem. THE STORM KNOWS.
And before that, THE CALM BEFORE THE STORM KNEW.
Come to think of it, chaos is a good way to hide the calm before the storm.
Do you think for a second that Trump actually stepped into it, KNOWING what Obama was up to?
Of course not.
The MEDIA can say whatever it wants – and THAT was the plan. But if people are listening to what comes out of a courtroom, and not just the media, then the MUH RUSSIA sub-plan of the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy just falls apart.
0 + 0 = 0.
They’re gonna have to live with it. “Grab ’em by the pussy” is NOT a crime. And even if it was, it’s not nearly as much of a crime as the conspiracy to get Trump to say it on tape for the purposes of political blackmail.
Sadly, one of the prime witnesses to THAT one just died.
NOW – let’s talk about something that may have come out in the Flynn testimony – the URANIUM ONE SCANDAL.
You see, I’ve found something interesting about it.
MARKED MONEY.
But not the USUAL marked money.
If you’re Russia, and you need to OWN Hillary Clinton in a bribe, how do you do it?
Marked money.
But what if there is no CASH – no CREDIT CARDS – nothing but NUMBERS flowing through banks?
You MARK NUMBERS with NUMBERS.
Let me explain.
You see, I just noticed something now, when I wanted to symbolize that Hillary does NOT get:
0 + 0 = 0.
I wanted to use a number for URANIUM, as in URANIUM ONE. So perhaps I could say:
0 + 1 = 1
for Uranium One. In other words, fake innocence + Uranium One = NOT INNOCENT.
Or I could use a commonly known number for uranium isotopes, like:
0 + 235 = 235
or
0 + 238 = 238
because 235 and 238 are ATOMIC WEIGHTS (actually ATOMIC MASSES, to be exact) of two very important ISOTOPES of uranium.
This doesn’t have any REAL meaning. I’m just being cute with numbers. I love math – even the simple stuff. What can I say? In some programming constructs, ZERO means Yes or No and ANY other number means the opposite. It seems weird, but after a while, it really seems beautiful. You can say that ANY and NONE represent YES and NO.
But then I decided that maybe I would use the amount of MONEY that Hillary Clinton GOT for all that uranium she gave to Russia in the Uranium One Scandal: 146 Million Dollars.
This rather odd even number (146 M) has been bandied about for a long time now. People on Twitter are intimately familiar with it.
Mueller staff must have gotten it wrong or twisted it to blame Trump as Russia got 20 pct Uranium from Hillary and she got 146 million, so now they want someone unknown giving up their groomed prise, not logical nor practical. because that info is closely held we will never know
In other words, if I subtract 146 from 238, I’m left with 92.
Well, 92 is the ATOMIC NUMBER OF URANIUM.
So uranium 238 has 92 protons and 146 neutrons.
In other words, RUSSIA MARKED THE AMOUNT OF MONEY.
Marked with the identity of what it bought. Putin quite literally paid by the neutron!
The uncommon number 146 is the difference – the weird, exact difference between the ATOMIC NUMBER of uranium, and the ATOMIC MASS of its most common isotope.
In this picture showing fission of uranium 235, where you see 235 over 92, like a subtraction problem, just subtract 92 from the 235 above it. The result? 143. But for the more common isotope of uranium, that number would have been 146.
Now – it doesn’t matter whose bright idea that number was, but my guess is that it was Russia’s way of OWNING Hillary. I know that Q says that “their symbols will be their downfall”, and that sure seems like a possibility here. It IS a symbol, but that symbol was, in my opinion, a hidden way of potentially reminding Hillary who was in charge, if she ever got cocky and said she could DENY the Uranium One payoff. No WAY old brilliant Vladimir Putin is going to let THAT happen.
Right?
I imagine there was some negotiation that landed on Russia’s final offer they knew all along – the scary give-away number – 146 – that could always be used by Russia to psychologically prove what the money was for, if Hillary tried to deny it. And if there was no negotiation – just a promise of “near 150 million – enough less not to look dangerous”, then 146 million is perfect.
Save 4 million and own Hillary! What a deal! 😉
Who knows? This could just be more “Q numerology” – much of which is highly questionable (particularly what originates with the less logical followers). Nevertheless, I think I MAY have a somewhat plausible theory here. Vlad is a tricky one!
We may never, ever, truly know.
146 is an octahedral number – shown with ball bearings.
Numbers are beautiful. But they never forget.
People come, people go. Worlds come, worlds go. Universes come, universes go.
But numbers. Eternal numbers. Only G_d could create such beauty. And such truth.
I urge people to read both links – the DC article immediately above, and Sundance’s analysis.
In my opinion, we are now seeing an open civil war in the federal government. This is completely analogous to what happened when the communists in CIA, FBI and DNC (as well as Stefan Halper, snug as a bug next to Erlichman) entrapped President Richard M. Nixon, and the government as a whole did NOT know what to do. This was the communist-created “constitutional crisis” which actually started the kangaroo courts known as special counsels.
Allow me to explain some very important things.
If you observe the Robert Mueller Hoax Kangaroo Court, it is curious for these reasons:
Comey really did not have a reason to instigate a special counsel – the logic was weak
Rosenstein, likewise, had little reason to start one – there was no CRIME to begin with
It was started very quickly, which made little sense, as there was no rush b/c no crime
It has always appeared to be a fishing expedition for weird stuff or anti-Trump stuff
It always appeared to be looking for process crimes on the anti-Trump stuff
It always seemed to be trying to GENERATE crimes on the anti-Trump stuff
Some of the crimes that Mueller obtained plea bargains for were not even crimes
THAT is actually similar to what happened in Watergate, with CIA personnel
The goofy weird stuff was Russians, but not related to Trump
All Russians found seem to be related to the Democrats and Obama people
Fusion GPS is weirdly tied to the Russians and the attorney let in by Loretta Lynch
Mueller indicted Russian women who acted as internet provocateurs and trolls
Those women were living in now-infamous Broward County
Those women lived very near Nikolas Cruz
Those women were long gone when indicted
It is now becoming clear to me that the Mueller investigation had THREE primary but closely related purposes:
Try to find dirt on Donald J. Trump
Try to create a “Watergate-style Impeachment Bluff” to get Trump out of the White House
Cover up Democrat collusion with Russia (and China, but mostly Russia)
I have discussed John Podesta’s part of the collusion HERE, and – sadly – I believe that I have inadvertently caused MORE “Panic in DC” in doing so.
The reason is that I carefully articulated WHY the Democrats “accuse the other side of exactly what they are doing“. In doing so, I came VERY close to doing so SPECIFICALLY for the Mueller special counsel.
The reason that the Mueller special counsel is tasked with going after an accusation of Trump doing exactly what the Democrats were doing – under the PRETENSE of going after TRUMP for doing those things, is so that they can COVER UP themselves doing those things.
Stated differently, the Mueller special counsel was a way for Democrats to keep a footprint in government in order to cover up Democrat collusion with Russia.
Sundance spotted a while back that Mueller seemed to be trying to corral all the evidence needed for FISAgate. Yes – that was a brilliant insight.
And NOW we have THIS incident, where the FBI raids the whistleblower against Mueller and the FBI. Well, that sure sounds like all the FISAgate “evidence corralling” that Mueller has been doing, too.
Beyond THAT, I think it’s even worse. I think that Mueller has been going after ALL the evidence of ANY Democrat collusion with the Russians – including female internet provocateurs and trolls who live near mass shooters – and is covering up THAT evidence by “corralling” it.
SO – what I’m saying is that we now understand part of the benefit of accusing the “other side” of doing exactly what they were doing.
What we are talking about is a RACE TO THE EVIDENCE. There is nothing to get one there FASTER than having a window on the SAME crimes and the SAME evidence, but PROTECTED by DISINFORMATION.
But because we know that “collusion with the Russians” and “accuse the other side of exactly what they were doing” are in operation, that means that WHOEVER Mueller was going after is DANGEROUS to the Democrats. Even if we don’t recognize them.
Do you realize how mind-blowing this is? NOW we have a good explanation of why they came up with bogus stories like “Mueller is gathering all the evidence that Trump needs! Mueller is on Trump’s side!”
This kind of disinformation is POSSIBLE when you “accuse the other side of exactly what you are doing.”
WOW. Talk about CHUMPS. We was CHUMPS.
Sundance also spotted that AT LEAST SOME of the people saying “don’t worry – trust the plan” and/or various forms of “trust Sessions” and/or “trust Wray” were in fact buying time for a counterattack by the communists.
I now believe Sundance was 100% right.
Not everybody. Certainly not me. But some. I’m sure of it. Even if not CONSCIOUSLY, I think some were simply misled. An “overconfidence ploy” against Trump and his supporters.
And now you’ve got John O. Brenzhnev posting his Soviet demoralization tweets to go after POTUS and his supporters.
“THE NOIVE OF DAT MAN!”
This admission may sound very weird coming from somebody who Sundance kicked out of CTH commenting for being a “Q believer”, but I really think that Sundance is right that the other side is helping to push “Trust the Plan”.
However, it’s NOT THAT SIMPLE. I believe that OUR side is legitimately pushing patience, too.
What I think we have here is a case of two sides that are bought into a kind of massive poker game, and “going for the mid-terms” was on BOTH of their agendas. This is a MASSIVE mutual deception between the two sides. This is a GAME OF CHICKEN.
There are PATRIOTS saying “Don’t fire until you see the whites of their eyes! Patience! Give Trump time and freedom! Trust the plan!“
There are also DECEIVERS saying “Mueller is on our side, don’t worry! Trust the plan!“
BOTH SIDES have been driving toward the exciting conclusion.
So – Sundance is right. But so are we. Here is why I think this.
I think that the game is getting EXTREMELY intense. Mueller’s cover is ALMOST BLOWN. Rosenstein’s cover is ALMOST BLOWN.
BUT NOBODY WANTS TO MAKE THE FIRST HEAVY MOVE.
I don’t think it’s a good idea for us patriots to be divided.
And yes – there are some among us who are actually helping the other side. Helping to cover up Democrat-Russian collusion to help China and the “globalists” (really another long Soviet front) “peacefully” slide us into a socialist model similar to both China and Russia. Look at Europe. Sure doesn’t look like the “West” won now, does it? Freedoms from oppressive government are disappearing everywhere.
But you know what? I trust TRUMP. And I trust the COMMANDER IN CHIEF. I trust the MILITARY to back him up. And I trust that “Q” would have been frogmarched LONG AGO if he was working for the other team.
I am ALSO observing that the new demoralization trolls on CTH, who came out of nowhere and psy-opped Sundance, are all screaming to declassify now. I don’t trust them. Not one bit.
I trust TRUMP. CIC TRUMP.
SO – I think it would be a good idea for CTH to let the good people HERE who USED to help Sundance chase away all the demoralization trolls, chase away the current phalanx of demoralization trolls. But if not, I’ll keep the good guys safe here, until things become much clearer.
I personally think that having TWO MAGA CANNONS to fire at the communists beats having just one. So I will not abandon this fort, and I will always HELP CTH whenever I can.
All I DO know is this. Times just got a WHOLE LOT more interesting.
W
BOOM!
PS – now you understand why they took down Alex Jones. “Conspiracy theories”. LOL! He might say something that MADE SENSE.
How the Real Story of Russian Collusion Nukes Robert Mueller and the DNC with John Podesta
If you noticed the EERIE BLUE-VIOLET GLOW around John Podesta’s head in my little graphic, don’t worry. It’s not RADIATION, even though I just put that idea into your head and you can do NOTHING about that, because you read this sentence.
More about that in a moment.
While John Podesta is about to become RADIOACTIVE, that blue glow is only my BAD graphic skills, extracting his head from THIS PICTURE…..
HEIL HILLARY!
…..and putting it into THIS PICTURE……
“YAHOO! Cultural Marxism Away!”
Yet notice – most interestingly – that I made a DEFICIT – my poor graphical software skills in working propaganda against John Podesta – into an ASSET – by the power of SUGGESTION.
Beautiful, isn’t it? That implication – that mere suggestion of RADIATION makes you feel all ICKY – doesn’t it? You don’t even want to look BACK at that picture. Right? But maybe you do. And if you do, you get a kind of perverse, sick, dirty feeling out of it. Right? That GLOW.
You can thank the Soviet Union for ALL of this. Your preconceptions about nuclear energy. The PSYCHOLOGY of disinformation that I just used to TAINT John Podesta. The CYNICAL ability to find a way to turn a deficit into an asset. AND for my skills in disinformation. I learned from the MASTERS. Including Yuri Bezmenov, who tried ALMOST VAINLY to warn the West how most of the KGB was devoted to DISINFORMATION – the science of lies and deception – and relatively little to actual espionage.
I have had to LEARN to dig though disinformation to figure out what is happening in this world. WHY useful idiots but otherwise fairly intelligent conservatives like Mia Love (yes, she’s BLACK) are fooled by their sworn enemies……
……and why sharper conservatives with SOME experience as liberals, dupes, victims, or even radicals themselves, like former liberal Candace Owens (yes, she’s BLACK) are NOT FOOLED.
Imagine comparing the slaughter of 6 million Jews, plus the mandated murders of 1 million Rwandans— to immigrants who just want an upgrade and don’t want to follow any rules to get it.
This is an abhorrent, disrespectful tweet and your low-IQ is an unacceptable excuse for it. https://t.co/bR8hyfRvkD
Note that I have stashed away actual PICTURES of those tweets, because there is a grave likelihood that TWITTER will ban Ms. Owens soon, deleting the PUBLIC knowledge of her Twitter history, and CBS may be in a bit of trouble, too, thus likely to edit their own Twitter history. This is ALL part of the importance of INFORMATION and DISINFORMATION.
Other than the Bezmenov video above, I do not have time to educate all of you in the finer points of lies and disinformation in the service of socialism. I should really call it communism, but I want to sound like an expert on Soviet disinformation, so I will use the term socialism as disinformation. I’m even using Yuri Bezmenov’s accent in my head. I sound a bit like Ilya Kuryakin. This is quite fun, actually.
Where were we? Ah, yes. The REAL story on “Muh Russia”. By the way, I’m generally sympathetic to Russia as a nation and people – on a variety of issues, and for a variety of reasons. I’m actually a hardliner on Crimea being Russian, as it was, in my opinion, stolen from Russia and given to Ukraine in a corrupt process under the USSR.
None of that really matters here. The fact is, I simply don’t like certain forms of socialism, because they are not faithful to the truth, and I’m very big on Truth. You might even say I’m sworn in service to the spirit of Truth. So I have to tell you the TRUTH about “Muh Russia”.
It is NOT what the Fake News has been telling you.
There is a truism about the Democrats that actually solves this entire mystery, if you DARE to fully believe it. Like the idea that light has the same speed, no matter how fast you are moving with it, against it, or away from it – otherwise known as special relativity – it’s actually HARD to believe this idea about the Democrats.
Democrats accuse you of exactly what they are doing.
common expression
There is actually a strong parallel with relativity. It has to do with WANTING things to be true, when they are not.
Most of us WANT to think that speeds add simply and times don’t change depending upon your speed – worse yet your acceleration. We want a world where speeds combine in the simple linear manner of 2 + 2 = 4 and time A equals time B.
But Einstein finally accepted that speeds in this universe are BOUNDED, if the rule REALLY WAS that no speed could be greater than that of light – always constant – which in this case might be an arbitrary number like “6”.
Thus, speeds of 2 + 2 are in a complicated fashion less than the expected number of “4” so that speeds are always totaling to less than the “maximum” number of six. Einstein accepted the implications that nobody wanted to accept – that such simple additivity that we all feel intuitively, REALLY IS only true at low speeds. If the maximum is 6, 2 + 2 is NOT 4, so that 4 + 4 is still less than 6. And Einstein had the equations and predictions to prove it.
The disgust with relativity was profound. The Nazis called it “Jewish science”, but they were not the only ones who didn’t like it. Even as a CHILD, long after the the world had defeated the Nazis, I observed that AMERICANS both within and outside of science remained somewhat – one might even say properly – skeptical of general relativity and its fantastic predictions, which were even more bizarre than special relativity.
Relativity is weird shit. It is HARD to accept. It doesn’t FEEL GOOD unless you study the HELL out of it to FIND THE BEAUTY.
The truth of Democrat collusion with the Soviet Union, and later Russia, is weird shit, too. It is HARD TO ACCEPT. But there is also some beauty in it too, if you are willing to accept some odd ideas that go along with it.
First of all, it helps to be forgiving. Collusion is not a crime. Trump repeats this for a reason. Only crimes are crimes. If one colludes to commit a crime, that is one thing, but colluding to do “good things” only becomes criminal if the means stray outside the law.
Sadly, we may find some of that. But not so much that we have to say “all Democrats are horrible communists and must be punished”. Not at all. In fact, I think the number of guilty will be surprisingly small, and their CRIMES will be clear. They will not be ideological crimes. They will be REAL crimes. Most criminals will not even be prosecuted. Don’t take my word for it. Q said this. So did FBIanon. They didn’t say it so coldly and antithetically, or in so many words, but do the math. It smacks of reality as well.
Back to “collusion”, which is not a crime per se.
The reasons that it is hard to accept Democrat-Russian collusion are as follows. These speak very strongly to how the disinformation works.
We don’t want Trump-Russia collusion to be true. The EASY way out of this accusation is to NOT make a similar accusation back against the Democrats. This is PSYCHOLOGY. Make it all GO AWAY by not saying that there is ANY collusion.
We don’t want Democrat-Russia collusion to be true. It’s rather scary, in some ways. The EASY way out of this reality is to say that their accusation of Russia-Trump collusion is “overblown” and “unreal”, which means the same for Democrat-Russia collusion. This is PSYCHOLOGY. Make it all GO AWAY.
We don’t want Russia to be the bad guy. If Russia is still a bad guy, that means
America is alone
“NeverTrump” Russophobes are suddenly RIGHT (in some ways) about Russia
Trump’s odd coalition of Russophiles, war-weary, battered conservatives, Tea Party, fiscal bleeding-edge American renewal enthusiasts, anti-Bush-dynasty, Reagan retreads, and all the rest, might be threatened
We have to adjust our thinking in profound ways
Russia may not even be the bad guy, if it’s complicated
What about China?
“splodeyhead”
These are just SOME of the reasons we don’t want this stuff to be true. We don’t even want to think about this stuff. Which, indeed, I have observed very strongly in Republicans and Trump supporters. There has been a lot of awakening. How much MORE is coming?
It gets bigger. There are many implications. Q uses “avalanche” terminology (D5) for a reason. The whole thing is somewhat like the avalanche model. We have reached a critical point, and there will be some slide. But hopefully it will be managed properly
history books will have to be rewritten
fake news will be revealed for what it is
information flows will change in massive ways
If you’ve been paying any attention to “Q”, then you know this is true. If you DENY “Q”, then you are going to be in for some surprises, and even shocks. Sorry about that.
But NOW – for all of those NEGATIVES – there is one great ADVANTAGE to accepting them.
It SOLVES everything. All the MYSTERIES of “Russiagate” / “Muh Russia” are solved.
And MUCH, MUCH MORE. They don’t call it the “Great Awakening” for nothing.
The thing is, this Great Awakening changes relatively FEW of the facts. What it DOES do is change our PERCEPTION of them.
SO – what I want you to do is BEAR WITH ME, and THINK IT POSSIBLE – just temporarily – that the maxim is correct:
Democrats accused Trump of doing exactly what they did.
What Democrats accused Trump of was colluding with Russia to win the election.
Therefore, we begin with: Democrats colluded with Russia to win the election.
We begin with the key player who makes this all work. John “Skippy” Podesta.
John “Skippy” Podesta had ONE of his email accounts hacked by Russia. The emails appeared on Wikileaks. I am absolutely, 100%, positive that Russia did it, just like Podesta and all the other Democrats are saying. The reason I am sure is that the SCAM works best if Russia actually did it.
Yes, it also fits our little relativistic maxim rather nicely, but that’s begging the question. Let’s look deeper.
There is no lie like the TRUTH misinterpreted. That is the CORE of disinformation. So let’s examine the truth – the FACTS – very closely.
I was never convinced that Podesta’s email hack was fully legitimate. Something was wrong with it. It was TOO clean. And you are hearing this from one of the people who researched it VERY heavily. I spent much time going through it, after it hit Wikileaks, and even for a while after it blew up into the semi-absurd “PizzaGate”.
Oh, now THAT was a beautiful disinformation operation as well. Is PizzaGate real? Is PizzaGate false? I’ll say this – it’s COMPLICATED and that complication is very intentional. But let’s not get distracted by ALL of the interesting disinformation goals that John “Skippy” Podesta achieved in this plot. Back to the TRAIL.
For starters, there was no criminal content of ANY kind in the Podesta dump. Nothing immediately criminal – not even anything that was really scandalous. Oh, there was the “pizza map walnuts hotdogs” bullshit, but I can file that into TWO major possibilities – yeah, it’s real but worthless evidence, and – yeah, it’s crazy over-interpretation of NOTHING. Even the “Scalia 186” / “wet works” stuff is NOTHING from the point of view of HARD EVIDENCE. Even all the embarrassing reporter contacts – STILL NOTHING. Even the weird E.T. stuff was INBOUND, not OUTBOUND. I even found what I thought was a smoking gun on Vatican influence by Podesta via his crony companies, and it turns out that I had mixed up BUSINESS Tara with CHURCH Tara. It was a NOTHINGBURGER.
Bottom line, there was nothing there. It was clean. TOO clean.
The fact that Podesta had protected his email account with a too-simple password is suspicious as hell, because it serves two disinformation objectives. It says “I have nothing to hide”, and it says “I’m a dope”, which clearly he is not. There is also the incident where his secretary opened some suspicious phishing email due to a miscommunication. Supposedly the Russians got in THAT WAY, too.
Doesn’t matter to me. I BELIEVE that the Russians did it. But I also believe that this was part of John Podesta’s PLAN. A very simple but effective plan, that worked for both the DNC and himself.
Insider compromise
Communication of natural targets and simple plan to Russia
Disinformation managed by Democrats
Now – I tried to tell people that I thought Podesta WANTED this email dump to happen, to frame Trump, but one of my most trusted opinions – a gal who goes by the online moniker of “wheatietoo“, felt that there WAS something nasty in those emails – a vague threat to “make an example of a suspected leaker” – who at that time everybody believed was Seth Rich.
This idea was everywhere, and had real mindshare. Even Wikileaks helped promulgate this idea, as you can see in this tweet by Wikileaks.
However, there are HUGE problems with this email having ANY significance.
If we look at it rationally, it means absolutely nothing. Even if there was a video of Podesta shooting Seth Rich in the streets of Washington, this email would be laughed out of court because firing a leaker or prosecuting a leaker or even taking away their parking privileges is well within its meaning to a reasonable jury. This email is like all the rest of the dump. Nothing.
This email was sent LONG before the DNC hack was even KNOWN, and quite possibly before the Russians had even entered the DNC system.
It is not talking about DNC hacks or leaks. It is talking about Hillary campaign officials in the FUTURE speaking to the PRESS or otherwise blabbing. So my vote is on parking privileges – maybe firing.
Can you believe that Wikileaks is promoting disinformation? Hmmmmmm.
Could Wikileaks be shilling for monetary support using Seth Rich?
Could Wikileaks be teasing and misleading?
Did Wikileaks know that Roger Stone was being misled?
Yes, it’s complicated, isn’t it?
What we did with this email was assigning our own meaning to a shiny object.
Now – isn’t that interesting. A shiny object. Podesta’s email hack – itself a shiny object – was literally just a bunch of shiny objects.
NOW – the trick here is to do the same thing we did earlier with accepting our starting point – which was an example of overcoming an Alinsky fear by ACCEPTING THE SCARY TRUTH.
Earlier, we accepted the scary proposition that the Democrats colluded with the Russians. NOW let’s accept the scary idea that PODESTA FOOLED US ALL like utter chumps – like children – like idiots. He left open an account full of shiny objects, the Russians hacked it as part of the plan, and we chased all the worthless shiny objects for a good part of the election.
We. Were. Idiots.
Accept it. Accept the scary truth.
Why do we do this? Because THAT is how we dig PAST the emotional blockade which EVERY scam uses to make you STOP DIGGING. People don’t report scams because they were not just suckers, but GREEDY, STUPID SUCKERS. It’s embarrassing. EMBRACE IT.
So – we admit that we were LOOKING FOR DIRT, FOUND NOTHING, and we were FOOLS.
So now I ask a few questions. A few simple questions.
WHAT were they fooling us about?
WHY were they fooling us?
HOW did they fool us?
For every shiny object, we ask this question.
I won’t get into PizzaGate, and E.T., and all the rest. I have excellent ideas in ALL those cases. But in the case of “making an example of the suspected leaker”, I will point out certain things.
If this is MISDIRECTION, it leads us AWAY from a hack
If this is MISDIRECTION, it misleads that Podesta was not THINKING of a hack
If this is MISDIRECTION, it misleads that Podesta is angry about a leak, not a hack
NOW – this is where it gets interesting. I am NOT saying that the DNC job was a leak, like so many Trump supporters WEAKLY contend. I’m saying that this Podesta email was misdirection to pretend “no early knowledge” of the DNC hack on Podesta’s part. I’m saying that the DNC job was a hack, and a hack by the Russians, exactly like the Democrats and Crowdstrike say. And at earlier times, before the hacks, when John “Skippy” Podesta curated his hackable email address for HIS part of the Russian hacks, he made sure his email trove had no hints about hackers. Or anything else, other than shiny objects that would not truly harm their side.
John “Skippy” Podesta was NOT thinking of hacks. No, no, no, no, no.
Yeah, right.
Now – about the DNC hack. Described HERE in the middle of 2016:
I’m saying it was almost exactly like the hack on Podesta – same thing – Russians – and I say this KNOWING that there is a fairly elegant but logically incomplete disproof of a hack, which I will now explain and correct, before the Democrats “miscorrect” it into nonsense.
A bunch of patriotic cyber and intelligence guys and gals on the RIGHT got together and showed, rather nicely, that the speeds of the file creation in the DNC hack indicate that the data was *compressed* (very important) locally and not over a network connection. In other words, the data was compressed within hardware at the DNC, and THEN shipped wherever it went. The files did not leave one location over a network and get compressed on the other end, in another location like, say, Russia.
For the life of me, I cannot figure out how anybody can think that this in any way disproves a hack. A remote view hack of the DNC basically gives a hacker LOCAL CONTROL. It’s almost like they are sitting right there in the room, except their monitor and keyboard are in – say – RUSSIA. What hardware are they operating? LOCAL hardware! (Local to the DNC, that is.) What are they doing? Why, they’re compressing the files locally! Just like a local person! And all of it is utterly asynchronous to their display in, say, Russia. (Which means there is no problem because of the distance.)
Now, the authors of this technically competent but criminally negligent proof (I mean that in the nicest way – these people are NOT good criminals) try to say that the evidence fits compression directly to a USB drive. Logically, this is a bridge to far for me, because they know as well as I do that the data fits compression to almost ANY local hardware in the right configuration, and they are schmoozing the conclusion toward the suspected Seth Rich scenario, but WHAT THE HECK – let’s just allow the hackers to scour the network, find a USB drive, and perform the compression on THAT computer directly to THAT drive, then move the compressed files back to wherever they need to go and send them on to RUSSIA. Then they GTHO.
This is NOT HARD. This is incredibly easy. This is a NORMAL REMOTE ACCESS HACK. Now, I could get all “USB” on this theory, and have some colluding Democrat put the USB drive into the computer for the Russians, but OCCAM’S RAZOR says it was just a HACK and that is that. Most likely, there was never a USB drive involved – just local hardware, as PROVEN. The Russians hacked in – AS PLANNED – got the data – compressed it locally – got the data OUT – and LEFT.
So now we are left with a question – to which I already had the answer. How did Seth Rich enter the picture?
Seth Rich was a WITNESS in a LAWSUIT against the DNC for FRAUD. The lawsuit was extremely bad for HILLARY CLINTON. The case actually AROSE from the DNC hack, as an unfortunate (for Hillary) consequence of the fact that it was clear she cheated Bernie out of any chance of the nomination. As Seth was a “Bernie bro”, the fact that he was called as a witness was NOT good for Hillary. He was a liability.
It is my contention that Seth Rich would be alive today if he had never been named as a witness in this case, or if the case had never been brought to court. BUT – here is the thing. I don’t really NEED this to be true, for Seth Rich’s death FOR ANY REASON to be useful to John “Skippy” Podesta.
Bill and Hillary Clinton are absolutely notorious for the fact that witnesses against them seem to have terrible luck prior to their testimony. Exactly WHEN the bad stuff happens may vary, but it always happens before they testify, and usually long before.
But AS I SAID, I don’t need Seth Rich’s death to be anything but a lucky coincidence, and thus an AMAZING piece of potential disinformation. ALL that DNC disinformation cadres needed to do was to plant the “Seth Rich / DNC / Wikileaks” meme in a few places on the right and voila! It grew like CRABGRASS.
Of course, if Seth Rich actually WAS killed to prevent his testimony in the DNC FRAUD CASE (sounds like a big deal to me), then – well, will ya look at that – linking his death to SOMETHING ELSE would have MOTIVE. Better yet, something that would be DENIED HALF-TRUTHFULLY by Democrats and SUPPORTED WRONGLY by Republicans and Trump supporters.
Does that sound like a good deal for Democrats? Maybe even good enough to make sure to leave a shiny object email that might mislead people to it?
And in fact, you would have TWO SCANDALS cancelling each other out – PROTECTING each other. Which is, you will learn, a wonderful principle of disinformation.
This whole thing is now a beautiful example of what I call “Eckert’s Law”.
When the cause of an operation is too advanced or too subtle to be detected by an adversary, Occam’s razor will point them to the most likely known potential cause, and this will be accepted and defended by them as the logical explanation.
Eckert’s Law
Disinformation will CHANGE what you think is the “simplest explanation” of something. Therefore, disinformation can help you get the WRONG result from Occam’s razor.
Even better, psychologically constructed disinformation will make you WANT to accept it, like a DRUG, when the TRUTH is more painful, yet leads to a better place in the end. So you will be tempted to CHEAT Occam’s razor by altering your own view of the world.
Are you starting to see it now? Are you willing to accept the PAIN?
The PAIN of KNOWING?
Now – after all this possibility has been put in front of you – after this deep dive – come up for air. Throw away all the complications that I’ve loosened, and ask yourself a simple question.
Who colludes with Russians? The LEFT or the RIGHT?
What people are not seeing here is that the simple answer of today is the SAME simple answer that has always been true. Democrats and Russians go back. They have a long history helping each other. Ignore the Fake News, pounding OVER and OVER with some counter-intuitive narrative about Trump and the Russians and how they wanted to help him beat the woman who gave them uranium at a STEAL and then covered it up.
Good grief! It’s crap!
If one of the two major parties is going to collude with the Russians, which one is it going to be?
You always knew the answer. It’s going to be the Democrats.
How will they collude in an election? Probably against the Republican candidate.
How will the Russians get the opposition files on the Republican candidate to help the Democrats? By hacking into the DNC and taking them, just like Crowdstrike found.
How will the colluding parties deceive us? By LIES, by DISINFORMATION, by accusing the other side of what they are doing, and by HOAXING.
Who does HOAXING?
DEMOCRATS.
We don’t have to change any of the facts. We just have to change how we see them logically. And in this case, we have to change how we see them, BACK TO REALITY.
THIS is the true nature of disinformation.
THIS is why they are – indeed – Fake News.
W
Hollywood. Trust me – we know something about disinformation.
Looks like Soros, Venezuela, Russia, China, and the Communist DNC just walked into a trap. By turning the border into a legitimate crisis – their WET DREAM – they unintentionally turned it into a bona fide national security issue – perfect for our VSGPOTUS to deal with in a more straightforward and Communist-proof fashion.
Notice how the Communists JACKED UP the problem, and then when it got here, realizing their MISTAKE, they tried to tamp down all messaging – all photos and videos? Seems like they figured out too late that they got set up.
Trump Boomerang Effect. The Democrat Fake News deserves no less.
Now we go on to those other 3 posts.
Here is the image of the referenced Q post within Post 2499, shown more closely.
That post (the “Nothing can stop what is coming.” post) contained a reference to the well-known “Trump vs. The Establishment” video. The post also put the CLINTON FOUNDATION straight in the crosshairs. WELCOME TO FBIAnon. I always thought that FBIAnon was the beta test for QAnon. Now I think they were more like Part A the warm up and Part B the SHOW.
Back to the rest of the post.
Or in text:
Everything stated has a purpose. Think timing of Tweet (above) v last drops [HouseOfCards] re: Maggie NYT re: WL ‘Maggie’ drops re: WL attack re: ‘Q’ Do you believe in coincidences? Be ‘extremely’ vigilant in Dec. See something. Say something. EXTREME PANIC IN [DC] WWG1WGA! Q
Q Post 2499
Note that a Trump tweet is referenced:
The same tweet as an active text embedding, for those who need text.
Clinton Foundation donations drop 42% – which shows that they illegally played the power game. They monetized their political influence through the Foundation. “During her tenure the State Department was put in the service of the Clinton Foundation.” Andrew McCarthy
An amazing tweet. Trump calls out the Clinton Foundation, and basically says (by quoting Andrew McCarthy) that the STATE DEPARTMENT was at its beck and call.
Remember who became Secretary of State AFTER Hillary’s embeds RESISTED former SoS Rex Tillerson, in regard to providing evidence to investigators. No such problems with Secretary Pompeo. Note that this picture was taken during questioning of Secretary Hillary Clinton.
Now we understand ONE of the reasons that Tillerson was replaced. The WITCH could not be prosecuted without STATE providing EVIDENCE to HUBER.
DONE.
Next, Maggie Haterman, the Politico flack (“Tee-em-up Maggie”) elevated to the NYT just for Hillary Clinton’s use before Hillary’s ascension, is referenced. Q calls attention to the timing of the tweets.
Maggie, Minion of the Hildabeast, was allowed to attack Trump, Q and the prosecution, and NOW Trump and Q drop bombs to show that THE MEDIA is not journalism, but (IMHO) DEFENDERS OF COMMUNISM.
Lastly, a very disturbing warning.
Be ‘extremely’ vigilant in Dec. See something. Say something. EXTREME PANIC IN [DC] WWG1WGA! Q
“Extreme panic in [DC]”
This means the PANIC is bigger than it was earlier. The first “Panic” posts were made around 9/11, and those were “frisky” times.
Huber testifying. Comey testifying. Yeah. This means a LOT of people are worried about skeletons in closets.
And THAT explains the WARNING to be “extremely” vigilant.
Thankfully, we have this EASILY WATCHED venue called The Q Tree now, don’t we?
“See something. Say something.” So much EASIER to do that, now that we’re free of the troublemakers at CTH, is it not? Why, it’s rather remarkable in hindsight. Maybe we’re SUPPOSED to be here.
It’s worth considering.
Next, the very monumental Post 2500.
This post quotes the prior one, and includes THIS new section:
The post deals mostly with Corsi, who is stated to have attempted to infiltrate Q, and it looks like he was doing so on Mueller’s behalf. This is then linked up to the idea that many of the people who “left” the White House did NOT have a choice. They were FAKE NEWS, FAKE MAGA.
As Q says – TRANSPARENCY IS THE ONLY WAY.
Patriots united. BOOM.
Finally, Post 2501.
The first part reviews what we know about classification NOT being able to hide crimes, errors, inefficiency, etc. Surprisingly, OBAMA make this Executive Order in 2010. There is indeed a bit of karma there.
The second part is the new information:
The big picture here is that Q is saying that Whitaker and the OIG (Horowitz) have approved the release of the FISA documents as requested by the HOUSE and ORDERED by Trump.
But will they be released BEFORE or AFTER the D5 testimony? Yeah. Think about THAT STUFF. There is useful ambiguity here – which may INFLUENCE testimony.
Finally, the points of conflict with the UK and AUS are noted – that these countries were in truth only allied with PART of the United States – “selected divisions”, as Q calls them.
The Dems? Deep State? Let me tell you, I actually *KNOW* about this selective collaboration – these “selected divisions”. I was never regarded as part of them – I do know that. In fact, I was TARGETED BY and USED BY those “selected divisions” and their foreign allies.
So things are going to be interesting to me in particular. VERY interesting.
I do NOT think that [Koala] means Cuddly Kudlow. I know that much. Pretty sure it’s a PLACE and maybe a COUNTRY and maybe SELECTED DIVISIONS.
One final point. Post 2499 references Post 2498 containing a link to THIS Maggie Haberman tweet:
Or as an embedded tweet:
OH on the Q train intercom: "Attention passengers. The intercom phone is for emergencies only, it is not for asking the conductor questions."
The basic meaning (where OH = “overheard”) is as follows:
Overheard on the intercom in the Q train: “Attention passengers. The intercom phone is for emergencies only, it is not for asking the conductor questions.”
Maggie Haberman, Twitter, Nov 20, 2018
Maggie MAY just be toying with Q supporters – the usual NYC snark. I thought it was cute and funny. But this woman is a friend of Hillary Clinton. She can’t be so stupid not to realize that Hillary Clinton is not a nice person. So it could be a “code-speak” message. And if it IS some kind of code, OH could be OHIO. But I can’t really see much more than that.
I’m interested in other interpretations. This is somewhat unusual. Maggie NYT may actually be passing information of some kind to somebody. So your thoughts are appreciated.
That is all. Let’s discuss.
W/WWG1WGA
IN GOD WE TRUST Because God not only HAS a plan – God IS a plan. In fact, GOD is THE plan.
