“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
I am going to begin explaining why I believe we are now at the point where, as could be done in communist China, government officials CONSPIRE WITH INDUSTRY to commit unethical acts against The People “for our own good”.
France saw this when [well-known communist] Agnes Buzyn KNOWINGLY sabotaged hydroxychloroquine prior to the epidemic.
America and the WORLD saw this when Anthony Fauci KNOWINGLY approved gain of function research to help the plotters create their “communist plague”, designed to help China, Democrats, and European globalists install a corrupt hybrid SOCIALISM world-wide.
This CCP level of deceit now infects the West, because MONEY – our own MONEY we gave to Chinese communists – is now talking and corrupting AGAINST US, thanks to the IDIOTS who let it all happen.
Now, even SCIENCE is corrupt and filled with LIES that benefit corporate interests.
The mantra of FAKE SCIENCE is this:
MONEY FIRST, TRUTH SECOND.
Please note what is going on in France, where the evil government is MANDATING inappropriate vaccines which are now KNOWN to cause immune enhancement.
Breaking News: French hospital workers refusing to give the vaccines that don't even work. They're done, they've had it. If this story grows and eventually everyone refuses to give the jab, the NWO will be destroyed overnight. France is leading the global revolution pic.twitter.com/lUwhXAH7RW
Let’s just save that information, in case Twitter deletes it.
I am going to explain why and how, momentarily, but right now we have an opportunity to DESTROY the LYING vaccine plague.
French citizen scientists have stopped GIVING the vaccine. But let’s put those vials to good use! It’s time to find out what’s TRULY in them!
I believe there is a good chance that at least one of these companies is using graphene oxide derivatives as a trade secret in their lipid nanoparticles for vaccine delivery. Graphene and derivatives are generally toxic and quite problematic in biological applications – yet at the same time, they have much potential. But how to get them into use cheaply?
THE PHONY PLAGUE.
The government-industry technical complex and their minions have promulgated disinformation as a way to both create opportunity and cover up their part in this COLLUSION between government health authorities and industry, in CCP STYLE.
Like China, they no longer feel a need to “go slow” on technology, and get the people’s consent. It’s ALL ABOUT THE MONEY.
This is CHINA infecting the WORLD with CCP ethics.
We can fight back – and the time is NOW.
Allow me to explain.
W
(The explanation follows as updates to this post.)
UPDATE 1 – The Spanish Report of Graphene Oxide
You may recall my previous article on graphene and derivatives in vaccines:
At this point, I don’t really know the answer to this question. I’ve only been studying it for a few hours. However, given the sordid track record of the Faucisphere in government, the duplicitous alien planet Big Pharma, and that wonderful global organization of medical liars and policy-reversing Tedros types, the United Nations of China, …
What I basically did in that article was to recount the following:
my disgust to hear the ABSURD ACCUSATION that there was graphene oxide in COVID vaccines
my satisfaction to VERIFY that the toxicity of graphene and derivatives is indeed well understood
my raised suspicions when a debunking of the ridiculous claim fell woefully short of my expectations
my astonishment to discover that use of graphene oxide in experimental vaccines is actually “hot”
I want to repeat that fourth point loud and clear. You can find NUMEROUS research articles on use of graphene oxide in vaccines, wherein graphene oxide gives fantastic results, in terms of antibodies, stability of vaccines, etc., etc.
Graphene oxide is like the ultimate adjuvant AND vaccine preservative.
Safety? Stop bothering me, kid!
All of this led me to the horrifying realization that maybe – just MAYBE – experimental vaccines were using an experimental component – a graphene oxide derivative – one that MIGHT be sneaking in under an EUA in which the GOVERNMENT actually has a monetary stake in the vaccines.
NOW – this is where it’s important to read the COMMENTS following the above article, because you will see me coming to an important realization about one of the events that triggered this whole thing.
There was a vial of Pfizer vaccine that was obtained by people who I can only really describe as “5G conspiracy theorists”, and this vial was sent to a Spanish lab for analysis. The Spanish lab found that the contents of the vial were 99% graphene oxide.
To me this absurd result was at best utter incompetence, and at worst a HOAX. That is what had STARTED ME on this investigation.
The thing is, I read as much as I could both FROM and ABOUT the investigators in Spain, with my rusty Spanish, and I could not dismiss their story. I will add some links in the references. I got the impression that they not only found graphene oxide – they took it to more qualified experts who CONFIRMED IT.
I have extreme difficulty believing that even SOME lots of ANY vaccine could be pure graphene oxide, although a former Pfizer employee has no problem with that theory (more on her amazing investigation later). This leads me to conclude that, if there is any truth to the “99% graphene oxide” claim, then it must be due to ADULTERATION of the sample that was given to them.
A point which, ironically, had been raised by the MSM DEBUNKERS of the graphene oxide claim. This sample could have easily been adulterated.
BUT WHY?
And THAT led me to make these comments.
Wolf Moon Online Author Coyote Reply to Gudthots July 16, 2021 03:37
Here is the part I’m interested in:
The first one is at 200 nanometers and the second one is at 500. Anyway, as I say, all the people who have worked with this material, obviously, when they have been presented with this material, have told us that without any doubt it is graphene oxide.
Apart from the evidence, as I say, of spectroscopy and magnetic resonance, we are now going to see some images under the optical microscope. These have much less magnification, but it is also significant. As you can see, this is the vial sample.
You see, I actually understand use of spectroscopy and NMR as tools of analysis, and THAT is how to unambiguously tell what’s in the vial. If they have the data, then they have the proof. The pictures are just icing on the cake for normies. If the data say graphene oxide, it’s a done deal. But if the spectroscopic and NMR data are bad, then this is destroyed.
But better still, is the age old CHN analysis, AND mass spectrometry. Pure carbon will stick out like a sore thumb in ALL of these. All 4 together are bombproof proof.
The fact that they have taken the material to people familiar with graphene oxide, and THOSE people think what they have been given is graphene oxide – THAT is significant. I don’t know what they did, but it’s significant that FAMILIAR experts think it’s graphene oxide.
But it’s NOT conclusive.
The spectroscopic and magnetic resonance data ARE potentially conclusive.
And if these people were competent, they did CHN and mass, too.
Now, the university is denying this completely. THAT would be expected under any circumstances. That has little effect on me. If the university BACKED the report – that would be highly unusual, and would have SOME effect, but just a little.
But if this can be shown at publication-grade levels to have been almost completely graphene oxide, then YES – I will believe that the vial they were given was full of graphene oxide.
THEN the question becomes WHY.
“Bruce Lee” in the Forbes article notes – as does the university – that this sample lacked a chain of custody.
EXACTLY LIKE DEMOCRAT-CONTROLLED BALLOTS.
Now – here is the deal. These guys sent (bad chain of custody) the sample for analysis THINKING that it was graphene oxide. But their reasoning – how they got to suspect graphene oxide – is highly flawed. Let me say very bluntly that their understanding of the science is not good, because it’s out of their field, and they’re victims of the magnet-sticking psy-op, like so many others.
But the key point is this. These guy are being monitored, AND they were already LOOKING for graphene oxide BEFORE they got the vial. The IC knew what they were expecting.
All of that said, I’m thinking it’s more likely than not that they did get a vial of Pfizer vaccine and SOMEBODY injected some graphene oxide into the vial – likely 100 times the amount of stuff already in there, thus giving the result. That is the FASTEST and SIMPLEST explanation for what happened and why.
A truly thorough “Wolf future science” analysis would have caught this, just like the Arizona audit caught stuff, because Wolf future science assumes that DECEPTION is going on at all times – both self-deception and other-deception.
The VERY first thing to do, expecting deception, is to check mass. And I will bet money right now that if they did check it, the mass of the sample was WAY too high.
I am going with the idea that the vial was tampered with. Why? Because it is a GENIUS intelligence operation. If I was in Chinese or Russian intelligence, I would have put up to 5 million dollars into the operation. Takes SECONDS to pull off, and it’s worth so much. ONE ChiCom student is all that’s needed.
You put graphene oxide into that vial, it just throws Western science into complete turmoil. It advertises graphene in vaccines. It discredits all their enemies. It deepens the magnetic vaccine hoax.
It’s awesome. If you’re the ChiComs.
So I had found SOME motive at that point, for the Chinese or their allies, to adulterate the vial, but not as much as I have NOW. And that will be the NEXT update.
Update 2 – Karen Kingston, Pfizer, CDC and Sinopeg
This is actually a fascinating scientific detective story.
Here is the link to the Stu Peters article about this segment of his show, in which he interviewed Karen Kingston on the possibility that Pfizer is using graphene oxide derivatives in COVID vaccines.
Karen Kingston is a former Pfizer employee, who as you will see is obviously familiar with researching patents and trade literature, and presumably in a Pfizer insider context. What she found is strong circumstantial evidence that Pfizer is using China-produced “pegylated” graphene oxides as a trade secret in their COVID vaccines.
Here is the 98-second version of what she found. Take a listen:
Now, obviously Kingston didn’t give the full story there – and she didn’t even give it in the full interview, because Stew Peters did a Sean Hannity on her and kept cutting her off and deflecting her from the complicated final connection of the dots. NEVERTHELESS, the full interview is quite AWESOME.
This is the 25-minute segment of Stew’s show, with only Karen Kingston, on Rumble.
Now, just for completeness, and in case this gets lost from Rumble, here is the Bitchute version of the FULL SHOW. You need to start at around 29 minutes, although he mentions Karen and graphene oxide a couple of times prior to that.
NOW – if you didn’t bother to listen to any of those, or just listened to the short one, then follow along with this WRITTEN explanation, showing each of Karen’s slides.
If you watch the full interview, it’s fairly clear that she had a great slide presentation which she was not able to show, because she got sucked into the “Stew Peters format”, which is basically BLUF and then push that to even greater outrage.
What I want to do here is focus on her slides and what she said about them. I would really love to see her planned presentation, but these slides REALLY help to see how strong of an argument she has.
She starts off by flashing this critical slide. We will come back to it. This slide shows a Chinese patent for graphene oxide lipid nanotech COVID-19 vaccines, sought by a Shanghai research center connected to a Chinese company called Sinopeg, which is connected to Pfizer and Moderna and other vaccine producers. This is basically the smoking gun that – yeah – they are using graphene oxide in COVID-19 vaccines – the only question being if they have deployed the graphene oxide-containing vaccines already.
Which I now believe they HAVE. We are taking too much flak. We are DIRECTLY over the target.
Karen then flashes a Moderna patent. She mentions this patent as a source of various kinds of information: explanation of the lipid nanoparticles, listing of the lipids used to make them, AND the code names of the lipids, all of which are in the patent.
The she flashes the Pfizer authorization report. She has actually noted two relevant lipids by their code names in the upper margin – those lipids being ALC-0315 and ALC-0159. You can see where they were identified in the document itself.
At this point Stew does a great interviewer trick but it’s a bit of a disservice to the explanation – he gets Karen to quickly summarize where it’s all going, and tries to get answers to the “Why the hell are they doing this?” types of questions. It’s fun, but it breaks up the detective work.
Then she gets back on track.
The next slide is from our old friend, Chemical and Engineering News, abbreviated C&EN. You’ve heard me go to them for vaccine news all the time. Karen calls them a “rag” – LOL – I avoided that term, but yeah, that’s what they call them. But I will say this – C&EN is a really great rag.
The bottom line here is that the C&EN article explains the very BASIC composition of the lipid nanoparticles in COVID-19 vaccines. You can tell by looking at the cross-section diagram, that these lipid nanoparticles are like a “ball of balls”, with both larger and smaller balls each containing a complex assortment of components. ONE of those components is something called a “pegylated lipid”. This means a lipid – a fatty substance – attached to PEG, otherwise known as polyethylene glycol.
Hook them together, and you have a “pegylated lipid”.
What do the lipids do? Basically, they assemble into what serves as a container for the messenger RNA. They not only helps DELIVER the mRNA – they STABILIZE it, too.
Next slide!
What this is, is the emergency use authorization (EUA) composition of one of the vaccines. You will note that the wording of the composition says that it contains what I could call “synthetic pseudo-mRNA” (what they call “modRNA”) AND ALSO [but not exclusively so] four lipids, plus inorganic salts – KCl, KH2PO4, NaCl, Na2HPO4.2H2O, and sucrose.
The four lipids in the vaccine appear to include one pegylated fatty amide, although she mentions that there are TWO of them, plus their Pfizer code names, ALC-0135 and ALC -0159.
While she’s here, she mentions the point about WHY graphene oxide is added – to add STRENGTH and STABILITY to the vaccine.
Next slide!
The above is a Sinopeg web page for one of the Pfizer pegylated lipids. You can see the code name. However, she didn’t find this company by any links from Pfizer – she had to do a lot of detective work using MSDS sheets (material safety data sheets) for these substances. THAT is how she discovered this company that Pfizer is using to make their nanoparticles.
Pfizer and Moderna really don’t want to say that they’re including Chinese nanotech in the vaccines, but yeah, that’s exactly what is happening.
Next slide!
Here, Karen shows how these substances are listed as COVID-19 excipients on the Sinopeg web site, and sure enough, they match exactly what you would expect in the Moderna patent.
Next slide!
Here, Sinopeg is talking about pegylated graphene oxides as “news”. Clearly they’re interested in them. However, don’t expect to find them listed along with the others under “COVID-19 Excipients” on the website if they’re a trade secret.
Starting to get the picture? See how that works? Trade secrets are a really stinky little concept. Especially when the GOVERNMENT is a PARTNER to them. A FINANCIAL PARTNER. Which is an extreme conflict of interest, IMO.
At this point, Karen is trying to explain that these graphene derivatives are interesting to a LOT more people than pharma. In fact, pharma applications are likely to be SECONDARY relative to much more overtly electrical applications.
Next slide! “Hydrogels”!
Next slide! More electrical and bioelectrical uses!
Karen and Stew then get into a long, beautiful back-and-forth conversation that is worth listening to SEVERAL times.
She mentions the Shanhai Nanotech patent again – the one for graphene lipid nanotech in COVID vaccines – and describes their relationship with the heads of Moderna, one of whom is in that picture below. Let’s look at that smoking gun again.
She describes the relationship of Fauci and Daszak and all the rest of these people through WHO – it’s really something.
Then she talks about REDACTIONS in the manufacture of the vaccines.
Let’s look at those.
Then they have a great conversation. For me, the most important part is how she describes a kind of “Cassandra wall” trying to tell people what she found.
Here is a woman – an industry insider – who knows what she found – and nobody believes her.
In my opinion, it’s our duty to try to understand this. And I believe that when you understand this that you, too, will believe her – just like I do.
At this point, I don’t really know the answer to this question. I’ve only been studying it for a few hours. However, given the sordid track record of the Faucisphere in government, the duplicitous alien planet Big Pharma, and that wonderful global organization of medical liars and policy-reversing Tedros types, the United Nations of China, I’m not feeling like giving these sneaky profiteers a clean bill of health just yet.
Let’s just say that I’m still collating.
As both American government and American / Western corporations increasingly act like their Chinese counterparts, I expect to see dog-killing treats with little “Made in the USA” graphics on them very soon, unless we bring the Great Fake Election and Virus Scam of 2020 to a very “judicious” close.
It was only tonight, that I had ever even HEARD of the idea of graphene or its derivatives in vaccines.
This HAD to be a conspiracy theory, I thought. NO. FUCKING. WAY.
Seriously. My immediate thought was “no way”. That would be like putting little molecular razor blades in the little biomolecular apples known as cells. Who the hell would do that shit?
And YES – when I went looking for information about the toxicity of graphene and friends, sure enough, there is a TON of information about it.
If you read that article, you will see that “molecular razor blade” is indeed just ONE of the ways that graphene and coconspirators damage cells, organs, organelles, and anything else that gets in their way.
It’s not like one might not expect that, given that graphene is a bit like asbestos and other inorganic particulates, only flatter and sharper, but you never know – maybe there are windows of low toxicity where things are OK, or at least BETTER. Indeed, such variable CURVES of toxicity are hinted at in the paper above, dependent on the size of the razor blades.
Science! It works! When you’re honest, of course, but if so….. it works!
But back to FAUCISM and why I don’t exactly trust the current “situation”.
After I was sure this stuff actually HAD toxicity issues that one might reasonably expect, I went looking to verify that this business about putting it in vaccines was just a nutty conspiracy theory.
And sure enough, a helpful “ABMG” type (associate of Bill and Melinda Gates- reference HERE) from New York and Forbes magazine assures us that NO – all the conspiracy theories about “graphene oxide” in the Pfizer COVID vaccine are exactly that – DUMB conspiracy theories.
The problem, if you go read this, is that the denial falls a bit flat. As in VERY flat. It reminds me of a variety of failed debunkings. It’s very much like a “Snopes evasion”, if you are familiar with those.
It’s nothing like the following:
“Pfizer kindly gave us three sample vials of their vaccine, which we were allowed to select at random from actual pharmacies and hospitals, with a letter of authorization from the head of Pfizer vaccines. We took these to an independent laboratory skilled in the determination of biopharmaceuticals and nanomaterials, including graphene and its derivatives. Not only were there no components that are not listed on the Pfizer and CDC websites – there was no detectable graphene of any kind, when subjected to known methods of isolating graphenes.”
See? An answer like THAT is “game over”, as Scott here likes to say.
Instead, the answer I got was basically a recounting of the true but mostly irrelevant fact that Jane Ruby is highly unqualified to talk in a deep and expert way about a lot of the things she talks about ANYWAY.
To which I say…..
“Yes, this is true. Back to the question. Please. They aren’t putting this stuff in the vaccines – ARE THEY?”
So I keep reading…… to which I then say…..
“Yes, it sounds like this is a conspiracy theory, and the people who say that the vaccine is 99% graphene oxide – obviously ludicrous – are almost certainly spouting bullshit. But I don’t care about that. ARE THEY putting this stuff in vaccines?”
So I keep reading, and the proof boils down to trusting that the ingredient list that Pfizer originally gave to CDC and FDA doesn’t include graphene oxide, and that Pfizer would never lie to CDC or FDA, because they would get in trouble.
Seriously. Go to the link and read it.
Of course, just because CDC lies like crazy, and FDA is horribly political, and BOTH are beneficiaries of these vaccines, wouldn’t affect what they might say.
Nor the fact that this IS an experimental vaccine where they don’t actually include the list of ingredients in the package for some weird reason, like maybe they would be lying if they did.
I mean, the Fauci People are mostly honest, mostly.
Well, I didn’t get a good answer from the debunking. So I looked elsewhere. THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE.
Why, there’s almost no need to stop by Forbes and have a science journalist just miss the fact that scientists find this stuff useful in vaccines, despite – or maybe even BECAUSE OF – its toxicity.
Thank you, Science Journalism! You’re almost as great as the other kinds!
A vaccine that keeps pumping out vaccine for 30 days after you inject it? Holy shit!
A vaccine that stabilizes messenger RNA at body temperature? Holy shit!
A vaccine that can migrate (“translational efficiency”) to the lymph nodes? Holy shit!
Now don’t get me wrong – this is great stuff. This is cancer-curing stuff – using mRNA and hydrogels and adjuvants and graphene oxide – gotta love it. You get CANCER – you might like this stuff.
Of course, if you get that cancer from a graphene oxide-containing vaccine for coronavirus, that might be a different story, but who is gonna profit on both ends of THAT equation? Don’t be silly! Insurance will mostly pay for it, mostly.
Yeah, you know what I’m sayin’.
And what’s REALLY interesting here is how LONG this vaccine lasts, when you use this graphene oxide stuff. I mean, it lasts a LONG TIME. And migrates, too! Even better than the old lipid nanoparticle technology!
Which just kinda seems a lot like the way the Pfizer vaccine lasts a long time in people’s bodies, and now even LONGER on the shelf, maybe TOO long in the body, which is good for gene therapy or cancer treatment, but bad for a disease vaccine, but let’s just ignore that alleged motivation for using a less safe new tech for a vaccine.
What I find interesting is how this graphene oxide stuff seems to STABILIZE the mRNA. Wow! Would that help an mRNA vaccine survive higher temperatures in normal refrigerators, like Pfizer does now?
Silly me just wondering aloud. It’s called a “hypothesis”.
And would Fauci and CDC actually TELL us if they changed the formulation just a little bit?
You see where I’m at?
And it gets worse, because graphenes cause symptoms a lot like COVID in the lungs, but – no – I don’t even want to go there. THAT is really kinda conspiracy theory. Let’s just stick to the simple question.
Is. Anybody. Using. Graphene, graphene oxide, or whatever. In COVID vaccines?
You know what? I don’t know. And I don’t trust government, industry or media to tell us the truth.
Because they all now ACT just like we’re in China. I mean, state media supports state industry.
This is for the historical record. I hope that this analysis gets to the “dissident scientists” involved, but even if it never does, future historians will get a powerful look at what I call “Fake Science” – the establishment’s phony, deceptive and controlled scientific complex – and how infiltration, control, and discreditation of dissident populist scientists was used in this era to keep them in check, protecting controlled science and the interests that keep it controlled – for money, power, and “say” in human destiny.
Even though this story has little or nothing to do with magnetism, I believe this was the beginning of strong discreditation of Judy Mikovits, Sherri Tenpenny, and other “COVID dissident doctors and scientists” who are pursuing the “spike protein and COVID vaccine gynecological problems”. Ultimately, the “coup de grace” was delivered via the phony vaccine magnetism psy-op.
The BIG HIT on this group was the discreditation of Dr. Tenpenny on “vaccine magnetism” – a CIA-constructed sandtrap which I could see coming a mile away, with great horror, as it was placed in front of these “insufficiently skeptical skeptics” – who are skeptical enough to doubt the controlling LIES marbled into mainstream science – but who are blithely unaware of just how evil the establishment really is, in making sure nobody listens to them.
That poor, poor woman. Sounds pretty crazy, doesn’t it? Well, here is the deal. The “establishment science skeptic community” is social, and because it’s a bit lonely in Skepticville, people become tolerant of the crazier stuff, very unlikely to be true, which can easily be fed into the community. Obviously an intelligence agency which knows psychology better than all our universities combined can have a field day with that stuff.
However, before THAT story – which we will get into later – there is THIS story – where I saw these doctors being set up for discreditation on a different topic.
Every time they used the word “suramin” I winced, and this is why.
I will follow this story in roughly chronological order, from my first awareness to today, when I saw the complete picture. However, I may “fast forward” to later knowledge, at times, to put things in context.
When I first saw THIS headline from the SGT Report posted in this site’s open thread (I think it was Duchess, so THANK YOU!), all I could think was “OMG, what a pile of unbelievability THIS is.”
Not only did I think that “vaccine shedding” was preposterous – the idea that it could be fended off somehow with pine needle tea just sounded NUTS.
That was May 10, 2021 – ironically exactly one month ago. I had NO CLUE that one month later – today – I would be convinced that not only is “vaccine shedding” real – Pfizer knew it was a “thing” all along – and long ago.
This is the Pfizer data obtained from the Japanese government.
This is the data up close.
The most important data is simple – the fact that the vaccine is relocating all over the bodies of the test animals – SHOCKINGLY to the ovaries as one of the primary destinations – and the amount of TIME it’s taking to do so. The reason is that the vaccine is encapsulated in lipids – fatty substances – which protect the mRNA, and give it time to get into cells.
Looking at this data, there is no reason to doubt that the vaccine could express in skin lipids, and given that it WAS INDEED expressed in breast milk (full of lipids), killing at least one baby, the EXCRETION of the vaccine at this point makes logical sense.
Thus, when this information got out, the CRITICS were in the catbird seat, and the INDUSTRY which oddly tolerated these results, was in trouble.
How does one flip that around? DISCREDIT THE CRITICS.
Now I did not realize at the time that THAT was what was going on with “pine needle tea”. I thought this was just the usual stuff that pops up routinely in the “natural health” world. However, a closer look at the article surprised me.
There appeared to be a chemical error, and it appeared to be Dr. Judy Mikovits making that error. But it’s not her making the error.
Here are two paragraphs of interest:
There is a potential antidote to the current spike protein contagion which is called Suramin. It’s found in many forests around the world, in Pine needles. Suramin has inhibitory effects against components of the coagulation cascade and against the inappropriate replication and modification of RNA and DNA. Excessive coagulation causes blood clots, mini-clots, strokes, and unusually heavy menstrual cycles.
Dr. Judy Mikovits asserts that globalists are well aware that pine needle tea is the answer to covid depopulation weapons, and they are secretly using pine needle tea to protect themselves from the very plague they have unleashed upon the world, Mikovitz explains.
I do disagree with a portion of Mikovits’ beliefs, but not everything. She really changed my whole view of “gain of function” – she sees very deeply into the problems of “Faucism”, shall we say. One thing she is NOT is stupid. So when I read that second paragraph, I simply didn’t believe it. It’s complete crap. “Pine Needle Tea vs. The Globalists”. Yeah, great movie! And kind of ironic that one would use a NATURAL ABORTIFACIENT to face off with “depopulationists”, but we’ll save that bit of “oy vey” for later analysis.
Well, deeper digging showed me where this came from. ANOTHER person who I usually trust, up to a point – Mike Adams of Natural News. From the day BEFORE – May 9.
Mike Adams is actually a pretty decent scientist, although he does allow guests on his show to wander off into clickbait generalities, far-fetched speculations, and utopian (or dystopian) characterizations. It’s just edgy stuff. Typical “natural remedies” world. I still buy the rational and reasoned parts of it – it’s just “old science”. And on the basic FACTS coming out of labs, Mike Adams doesn’t present “fake data”. He waits like a buzzard for REAL DATA that looks good for “naturalism” and then plays “AHA! LOOK AT THIS!” with mainstream medicine. It’s a “schtick”, but it’s a pretty good one.
Anyway, the wording is identical – SGT Report was just copying and mirroring Natural News, as they often do.
I saw at the time that Mike Adams had just picked this information up from some naturals blogger, and had copied it verbatim.
Now – beyond the nonsensical attribution to Mikovits, there are actually TWO big chemistry problems with this article that Mike is citing.
One is on the idea that shikimic acid – the desired ingredient in pine needles – IS Tamiflu.
Quoted in the story:
Researchers at the University of Maine at Orono say they’ve found a new and relatively easy way to extract shikimic acid — a key ingredient in the drug Tamiflu — from pine tree needles.
That’s not exactly true. Shikimic acid is NOT Tamiflu, nor is it an ingredient in Tamiflu. Now, a more accurate statement is also given:
Shikimic acid derivatives have also been shown to exhibit useful biological activity. Most notably, the well-known antiviral drug oseltamivir (Tamiflu), which acts as a viral neuraminidase inhibitor, is used to treat seasonal influenza and has been deployed during H1N1 influenza outbreaks.
YES. A derivative. Tamiflu is RELATED to shikimic acid, but it is a distinctly different molecule. Shikimic acid can be used to MAKE Tamiflu. But it is a building block – not the same thing.
All that said, shikimic acid, whether from star anise or from pine needles, is indeed antiviral in some contexts, and antiinflammatory in others. So, YES, pine needles are an actual curative thing. More than just containing an exotic natural acid, they were the equivalent of citrus fruit for North American Indians.
Indeed, pine needle tea can be used to treat scurvy, and it’s BETTER than just vitamin C (which it contains in vast amounts), because it also contains flavonoids which are curative for vascular symptoms of scurvy.
However, you have to pick the right pine needles – some are poisonous, and even the good ones can INDUCE ABORTION.
The part about inducing abortion is VERY critical. That would be very problematic for these doctor critics of the spike protein vaccines, if they were in fact advocating “a different abortifacient instead”.
See how that works?
That is – how do we say this? – ah, yes – discreditation.
Now, at the TIME, I just thought to myself “Wow – how unfortunate that these people who are going after the ‘abortion vaccine’ are advising people to take an abortifacient.”
And I’m not the only person who observed this. It turns out that the original blog article was edited a number of times, to ADD warning information about the potential abortifacient risks of pine needle teas. The information was not there originally. It looks to me like blog commenters (comments are invited but hidden) likely cautioned the author about the problem.
Yeah, let’s just give THAT the “jaundiced editorial eye” that Maria does so well.
ANYWAY, on to the OTHER chemical mistake – SURAMIN.
This is actually rather cute, and the wicked industry that just savaged Dr. Tenpenny is going to get a little karma here.
As you will see, shortly, part of the “discred” here is also for suramin itself – because it’s a potential and very legitimate “HCQ” or “ivermectin” – a readily available treatment. I didn’t realize this at the time.
I will explain that more fully in a moment.
Suramin is a synthetic drug – it’s not a natural product. Many of us can tell just by looking at the structure.
And NO, this stuff is NOT in pine needles. Anybody who says this is INSTABLOCKED in SCIENCEVILLE.
Suramin is a killer of parasites – it’s used to cure sleeping sickness and river blindness in Africa. It’s actually a well-known, long-term, old drug. Indeed, it’s a lot like hydroxychloroquine, being on that WHO list of essential medicines.
Aubergine, our local naturals expert, quickly spotted that this was a synthetic drug and very unlikely to be in pine needles. I confirmed her suspicions, but I didn’t really dig into WHY this error had been made in the article – until today, when I saw it from a discreditation angle.
First of all – to my surprise – there is some real science behind suramin as a treatment for COVID-19.
The following is from a very solid source that monitors new medical developments in the scientific literature.
Here we report the discovery of suramin, a 100-year-old drug, as a potent inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) through blocking the binding of RNA to the enzyme. In biochemical assays, suramin and its derivatives are at least 20-fold more potent than remdesivir, the currently approved nucleotide drug for COVID-19. The 2.6 Å cryo-EM structure of the viral RdRp bound to suramin reveals two binding sites of suramin, with one site directly blocking the binding of the RNA template strand and the other site clash with the RNA primer strand near the RdRp catalytic active site, therefore inhibiting the viral RNA replication. Furthermore, suramin potently inhibits SARS-CoV-2 duplication in Vero E6 cells.
Better than Remdesivir? AWWWWW. Where did we hear THAT before?
OH, I REMEMBER! It was some drug called “hydroxychloroquine”!
So what you are seeing here, is that ANOTHER old antiparasitic drug looked to be BETTER THAN REMDESIVIR as an antiviral. Why, that would almost be THREE FOR THREE. Were it not nipped in the bud.
So indeed, Dr. Judy Mikovits had spotted that suramin was a useful drug for COVID. She had prior knowledge that it has been trialed as a treatment for AUTISM, and that, also, with some surprising success.
Now – here is where it gets really interesting.
THIS video was cited in the “pine needle tea” blog post. It is HIGHLY edited. Just listen. The MUSIC is absolutely CRINGEVILLE.
https://youtu.be/JYHrmmmoX30
NOTE ADDED LATER (June 14, 2022)
You will note that the video is now just a link.
Here is an EARLIER screenshot from right after the video went down – which was basically a day after I published.
Note that it was NOT removed by YouTube – it was removed by the uploader at that time.
Here is a screenshot from the video when it was up.
This Academy of Divine Knowledge (June 14, 2022 discussion HERE) seems tied to many of the luminaries of the “discredited dirty dozen” – but IMO it may very well be part of the discreditation of them.
It’s too bad the video is down – you cannot see the skillful editing. Basically, an earlier video of Mikovits which was “good science” was recast by editing to create a point of division on falsehood, rather that a unification on truth.
As I was saying (before this note was added)……
This is a beautiful editing job which accomplishes two things:
(1) makes Mikovits look authoritative to people in the new age end of the natural remedies world ($$$$$)
(2) makes Mikovits look utterly discredited in the scientific world (?????)
One would not know, from this video, ANYTHING about the idea that suramin is turning out to be ANOTHER potential HCQ, safer and better than remdesivir.
But yet this video is “helping” her, and I seriously doubt she realizes just how undermining it is.
This is how discred works. Very often, the subject has NO IDEA. They may see the discrediting actions as not just neutral, but well-intended. But outside the understanding of the target, discred keeps things DIVIDED. Serious people are not going to take Mikovits seriously. Suramin will look like one more fish tank cleaner. Remdesivir (very likely on the cutting room floor for that video) won’t be threatened.
It’s so SLICK.
But THAT is not the best part. When suramin is FALSELY linked to pine needle tea, and the CHUMPS – the MARKS – are tricked into saying it – everything falls apart.
Mikovits’ advocacy of suramin as another potential HCQ / ivermectin looks loony
The Chinese chump scientists’ very legitimate work on suramin, but threatening remdesivir, gets memory-holed
Any doctors who pick up and repeat the error about suramin and pine needle tea are tainted by the error
The chump docs are now ready for the coup de grace – the phony magnetic vaccine psy-op
I hope you now see WHY these small errors matter – and why “opposition research” is a THING not only in politics, but in the highly politicized science, under which we now suffer.
I think these good doctors were SET UP.
I think that THIS:
…..was the DESIRED OUTCOME OF THIS:
“Dissident” doctors and scientists need to be more careful. We are up against very EVIL people.
Wherein we look at how the COVID scammers are now using “magnetic” disinformation to try to escape justice for REAL abuse of liposome biotechnology to achieve [most likely contraceptive] vaccine persistence and migration.
TL;DR – after mRNA vaccine persistence and anatomical migration were revealed in leaked Pfizer data, explaining “shedding” via persistent liposomes, the COVID scammers began using “magnetic disinformation” to hide the intentional chemical and physical DESIGN of the lipids and liposomes to achieve persistence and migration, necessary for contraception and/or sterilization.
Things are moving very fast now. I wanted to sleep in today. I guess that’s not happening.
OK – let me quickly update everybody on where “things magnetic” are going. They are moving VERY quickly.
You need to understand HOW and WHY.
You will recall the very dubious “magnet challenge” where people were “sticking magnets” to the sites of their COVID vaccinations. To be very blunt, I have become so skeptical of our government, Tony Fauci, Bill Gates, and all these other creeps, that I was half-inclined to believe it – even though it SEEMED like nonsense.
And – as an act of partial disclosure – I’m not just some guy with refrigerator magnets. Some stuff from a field that I worked on (no pun intended) is actually now grabbing headlines. Yeah, I was a part of “fake science” – and I can assure you that some of it is very real. But – as I discovered very painfully – there are a LOT of lies in “fake science”, too.
SO – I decided to actually “give it a fair chance”, and investigate it myself. The results of my investigation turned out to be very enlightening, but not in any way that I expected. I am going to take you through it now.
But first, this.
The Motive To Cover Up Scientific Misconduct
It is important to understand that the CREEPS behind this whole COVID COUP are trying to evade responsibility for what is likely the most egregious scientific misconduct I’ve witnessed in my lifetime.
Possibly the greatest that has ever happened on this planet.
Basically, one of the first papers to spot the likely genetic engineering of the COVID bug was forced into retraction, thanks to Tony Fauci. This is, as many people are calling it with some irony, “political science” – or more seriously “politicized science”.
This is the same Tony Fauci who is in that picture above, with all those media puppets and David Rockefeller, right around 9/11, and 20 years before the medical bureaucracy and the media would try to pull off the COVID coup. That picture is quite real, by the way.
I actually did a lot of digging on this to find that open source, too. It’s a very legit photo.
Thanks to Deplorable Patriot for this tip on Rockefeller, which brings things full circle.
In my opinion you MUST see this, to get the big picture.
If you’re starting to see why Bill Gates and Melinda Gates (remember – there is a Gates in that picture, too – Bill’s dad) are doing a “move the money” dance with a media-assisted divorce, where the MSM is obviously “helping” with an infidelity narrative, you understand that there is some serious downfall going on.
Bill Gates is NECK DEEP IN SPIKE PROTEIN.
And SPIKE PROTEIN is not somewhere you want to be. If you need to catch up on where I am at, on the spike protein (and you WILL need this background, some of which I will cite later in this post, but not all), then take a detour to my last post on coronavirus vaccines and the spike protein.
TL;DR – you MUST listen to a short podcast of a scientist revealing the latest research on the spike protein vaccines. The VACCINE ITSELF (not just the spike protein – the mRNA vaccine itself) is persistent and is not only concentrating in ovaries – THE VACCINE ITSELF IS EXCRETED – e.g., in breast milk. Meaning …
And THIS is where it gets worse. The downfall is MORE THAN DESERVED.
This whole COVID scam is Lex Luthor stuff. It’s like something out of a movie. And THAT is why they are using top-shelf, almost magical, movie-level disinformation to hide what is going on.
This is why they are controlling the disclosure narrative with that Twitter-groomed group “DRASTIC”.
When you have to use “Chinese cover-up” as a cover-up, you’re covering up something BIG.
People actually DIED by the thousands and even the low millions because of GREED.
Remember “Lancetgate”, that DISCREDITED PAPER against use of hydroxychloroquine, which appeared in The Lancet? That bad paper, not by real scientists, but by some kind of data-mining cut-outs. That terrible paper, which was used by WHO and the UN to get several countries to BAN treatment of COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine – only to see (1) the paper retracted after popular investigation showed the paper was actually terrible – bad scientific analysis, and (2) DEATHS spiking in countries which banned HCQ in response to Lancetgate, and then dropping after HCQ was re-allowed.
I refer to this as “the Lancetgate effect”.
There is a lot more than this, too. Cuomo, the nursing home killer. China and WHO preaching AGAINST steroids, when those were what SAVED people with really bad cases of COVID-19.
This whole COVID coup was really a kind of “we must not fail” operation. And it is FAILING BIG.
OK – so now you understand the MOTIVE for covering up.
Let’s get to part of the MEANS – disinformation.
Giving Magnetic Vaccines a Chance To Be Real
I did an earlier post which summarized MOST but not ALL of my investigation of the “magnet challenge”.
Wherein we examine, in something like “MythBusters” style, the dubious “Magnet Challenge”, without relying (too much) on the anti-scientific crutch of scientific authority First, a confession. The main reason I am attracted to these videos of people sticking magnets to the COVID vaccination injection sites on their shoulders, is that I love to watch normal …
The basic result of my open-minded look at magnetism in vaccines, comes down to the following points:
the “magnet challenge” is not an adequate test due to surface adhesion phenomena
people are not being very scientific in their testing – or at least not scientific enough
there is no way people are getting fat RFID chips – which could interact with a magnet
however, that is not to say there is nothing magnetic – we need more and better data
we need more sensitive tests to investigate any alleged magnetic effect of vaccines
there is real, published, intense scientific interest in biomagnetic nanotechnology
magnetic recording nanomedia COULD be used to uniquely ID vaccine recipients
and yet, the whole thing – both the real and the false – feels like disinformation
Now – here is where it started getting good. This is in the COMMENTS of the “Part I” post.
Deplorable Patriot alerted me to allegations that magnets were sticking not just to COVID vaccine injection sites, but where people had been COVID-swabbed for TESTING.
Well, I had not been vaccinated for COVID-19, having already had the disease, and knowing basic science that I didn’t need a vaccine. Thus, I was unable to do the “magnet challenge” myself. However, I HAD been very recently COVID-swabbed, in the front, near my nose.
Yeah, it does, which freaked me out a bit until I examined things very closely.
Experimental
I took my neodymium kitchen magnets and tested to see if they “stuck” to the bridge of my nose. I had not tested there before.
Results
Shockingly, I found that the magnets stick surprisingly well to two spots on either side of the bridge of my nose, high up near my eyes, and directly over the area which was COVID-swabbed. I could even make the stick defy gravity, like the key demonstration, which was very convincing.
Had I stopped testing right there, I would have been convinced that the magnets stuck to those spots above the COVID swab site for magnetic reasons.
The behavior mimicked very strongly an actual attraction, BUT if I carefully observed the approach of the magnet, when using a leveraged HOLDER which would allow an acceleration to show itself, I was completely unable to observe an ACTUAL acceleration of the magnet. It NEVER accelerated to the skin.
As a check, I began testing many other sites on my face, including my FOREHEAD, where I got some excellent sticking. With enough testing, it became obvious that sticking is proportional to several factors:
local flatness
local hardness when flat
local softness when curved
skin moisture
skin oiliness
All of this adds up to SURFACE STICK. I then began testing for surface stickiness with a single fingertip, which mimics one flat side of a magnet. I would “stick it” and then then pull it away. Sure enough, the places where I get the magnet to stick the best, are places where I can get AUDIBLE “peel” when I pull my finger away from the “stick”.
I also observed, very carefully, how the magnet detached. In all cases, it appeared to be a “flat peel to a drop”.
Conclusions
It’s a surface stick. The reason I don’t get this on my shoulders is DRY SKIN.
Vaccination sites are likely BETTER FULFILLING the criteria I found for magnet surface sticks.
showing central moisture and oiliness due to penetration
showing local flatness due to nurse selection of centrality, depth, and non-edge character
This is all making sense to me now. At this point I think it is very unlikely that we’re going to find something that would show an acceleration of a magnet.
I hope you get that. I basically learned WHY people are being fooled by surface adhesion. I experienced it myself. It’s extremely convincing.
SO – at this point, the “magnet challenge” really struck me as a VERY professional psychological operation – even better than “flat Earth trolls”, although not as good as “masks”.
I repeat. “Magnets sticking” is a psy-op.
It is very clear that magnets stick to you in the right spots. It’s very EASY to convince yourself that they are sticking BECAUSE they are magnets. It’s very HARD to “re-convince” yourself that they are REALLY sticking because of surface phenomena.
I wanted to then do another post – a “Part II” – about actual, real, magnetic biotechnology. However, there is clearly no rush on this. So I set the whole project aside – until now.
Hiding Real (and Guilty) Lipid Vaccine Biotechnology Behind Rumors of Magnetic Nanotechnology
This is where it gets REALLY GOOD. They are trying to cover up SO CLOSE to their little unholy grail, that it really gives away what they are trying to cover up.
They are MISDIRECTING us. They are MISLEADING us.
RedLegLeader68alerted me to a highly relevant video:
W – can you check this out? (sincerest apologies if already posted; I just got home!)
Magnetism Added To mRNA “Vaccine” Intentionally To Force It Round Your Body
Here is that video, with Stew Peters and Dr. Jane Ruby.
As SOON as I saw this, I realized what is going on. The people who have promoted these ideas onto us are utterly and TOTALLY taking advantage of most people’s lack of scientific training and expectations.
Yeah, you could actually do some kind of cool stuff with vaccines and magnetism….
BUT YOU DON’T NEED TO DO IT.
I don’t know who those people ARE, who are manipulating us, but they are taking advantage of people like us – of people like Stew and Jane. I don’t blame people like us for not knowing better.
When I get into the later post about biomagnetic technology, you will see that there really is EXTREME interest in manipulating our internal biology and biochemistry using magnets, microwaves, radio waves, oscillating magnetic fields, and much, much more. They are doing it right now, in a very basic but sometimes quite elegant way in the laboratory, and they are deeply interested in it. Some of it – maybe even most of it – is alleged to be for good purposes. Whatever. No matter what, they are extremely interested in it.
It is VERY EASY to assume that is what is going on here, but that is NOT what is going on here.
There is no REASON – there is no NEED – to use anything but PLAIN OLD CHEMISTRY AND BIOCHEMISTRY to do what they are doing, in terms of sending the vaccine around in our bodies. No magnets are needed. Absolutely none. Now, of course, “moving around the body” is not supposed to happen, but just ignore THAT little shocker for now. Yeah, that vaccine is supposed to stay right there in the arm muscle, if it was anything close to a normal vaccine.
Nope. All you need is plain old chemistry and biochemistry. And that PLAIN OLD CHEM AND BIOCHEM has to be carefully and delicately DESIGNED. And it centers around the LIPIDS used to make the little nanodroplets. PICK all the right stuff. ADD all the right stuff together. Watch what it does. Tweak it until it does what you want.
Let’s look at that more closely.
I see that data, and I start seeing data that is “off the charts”, so to speak, and that data is even more striking.
This stuff is discussed more fully in my last post about the spike protein, but I was fairly explicit in a recent comment on a daily thread, where I explained WHY shedding is a kind of unintended consequence of the persistence and mobility of the vaccine. You know – little lipid nanodroplets that HANG AROUND might actually get expressed in BIG OLD LIPID MICRODROPLETS coming out of our skin.
We had all (or at least most of us) thought “shedding” the vaccine was impossible, because the vaccine would work quickly and locally to build immunity, not go “moving around”, and certainly not go around “persisting” for – say – 24, 48, 96, or some other absurd number of hours.
COUGH.
No. I’m sorry. I do NOT need “magnets” of any size to explain that SOMEBODY designed these vaccines to PERSIST, to RELOCATE, and – probably accidentally, but who knows – to SHED – you know – like in body lipids that we secrete.
Why the #### do I need MAGNETS, when LIPIDS explain everything?
OK, I’m done here. I need some sleep.
Come up with a new excuse, your Faucists and Rockefelleroids.
George Webb seems to believe that the AMERICAN MILITARY was behind COVID-19.
I tend to think that CHINA and its AMERICAN ALLIES (DS, DNC, CIA) were behind it.
But I will bet we both agree on one thing.
WHOEVER KILLED THE MARRIED ARMY DOCTORS HAS SKIN IN THAT GAME.
The two arrested in the murders of Dr. Edward McDaniel and Dr. Brenda McDaniel identified as Ronnie Marshall, 20 and D’Angelo Strand, 19. The two were co-workers of one of the McDaniels’ relatives. @7NewsDCpic.twitter.com/Yc7eB8ryHr
Nothing about the Wuhan connection. THAT is what we are looking for. This alleged connection could be pure bullshit, but yet something stinks.
That article doesn’t really do anything other than to reinforce the connection between the murders and the attempted burglary at the same residence earlier in the week on the MONDAY – and that the police were certain these were connected. For all that’s worth, it’s sketchy as hell. Burglary?
The People Magazine article is linked to THIS local WTOP news report, which included this critical information about the “cover murder motive”:
Police said they believe the shooting Wednesday on the 8000 block of Flint Street near Redman Street was a “follow-up and related to the interactions Monday,” when police responded to a call for service and conducted an active burglary investigation.
Police Chief Kevin Davis said they know that at least one of the two men was at the home on Monday.
Davis said the motive is currently believed to be a dispute, and police are working to figure out what it was about.
Maj. Ed O’Carroll, bureau chief of Major Crimes Cyber and Forensics for Fairfax County police, said the investigation is ongoing.
“As of this moment, we have not located the firearm, but we have a lot of work to do. I mentioned the vehicle that’s now in our possession. We got a lot of things to follow up on. We want that firearm … This case does not close with these two arrests and these multiple charges. In some aspects, it’s just beginning,” O’Carroll said.
He’s asking anyone with information on what happened to call police at 703-246-7800
The McDaniels were both military doctors and colonels, and Edward McDaniel was still active with the Army.
OK – so we know that one of the killers was at the residence on Monday in connection to the “burglary”.
Now, here is MORE information about the “motive” via Axelrod-Alinsky media, NBC Washington (something like the commie media equivalent of the Washington Field Office). Note that the narrative motive actually gets recorded (very important to establish “facts”) – this is from other local coverage:
Officers were called to the home Monday about an altercation and potential burglary in progress, Davis said.
On a dispatch call to responding officers, a dispatcher can be heard saying the caller and her husband were upstairs with a shotgun in their home. “The subject” was in the basement.
“Caller is advising the subject is after her son and that he is with them upstairs,” the dispatcher said.
Two days later, the parents, not the son, were killed.
The deaths mark the ninth and 10th homicides in Fairfax County this year so far, in an increase from the count last year at this time.
A $10,000 reward for information is being offered in this case.
Stay with NBC Washington for more details on this developing story.
In my opinion, the parents were ALWAYS the MK target of the pliable “Seth Rich MS-13 type” “dull as a sawed nail” shooters. You Know Who is already off the charts on this one.
You will note at this point that everybody is pushing the “dispute” angle. More references (not cited here) included at the end of this post.
Running out of leads, I did some searches on the name of the deceased, the name of his hospital, and “Wuhan Games”. THAT got interesting. I found nothing direct, but I did find TWO very interesting leads, BOTH of which pointed to research by George Webb.
First, an article in Veterans Today, a very shady “John Kerry” type operation which is routinely sided with Russia and China, hiding behind the Vet Card.
This is basically supporting the Chinese counter-narrative to the earlier Wuhan Games theory that CCP spread the disease via the Wuhan games. The Chinese counter-theory, that the US started the virus at the Wuhan Games, launches off George Webb disinformation that COVID came from here. Well, yeah, it did, but that’s a little more complicated than China’s “malign blame-shifting conspiracy theory”.
George Webb is cited several times, including multiple tweets, but now that his old account on Twitter was REMOVED and then taken over by an anti-Webb Democrat troll, there is no official record to be found. However, the TEXT of the tweets remains in this article, and it’s useful to look at them. E.g.:
Patient Zero from Wuhan, Maatje Benassi, is a Dutch American woman cyclist. Her husband is also a cyclist in the US Atmed Forces (SPAWAR) and believe you be in Wahan in October of 2019. Benny Benassi is Patrient Zero in Holland, and has already made a rap video about Coronavirus pic.twitter.com/u1Z5VuYCaG— TruthLeaks – Investigative Journalist George Webb (@GeorgWebb) March 22, 2020
Webb’s basic theory is that the virus was spread from Fort Detrick to China via a US military cyclist in the games, who has State Department (i.e., CIA) connections. This is where it all gets really messy, not the least of which reasons being that I suspect that at this point, Webb was being fed disinformation.
That woman cyclist is Dutch and an Italian citizen, yet is somehow in the US Army as an intelligence operative. WTF. She comes back from Wuhan and gives COVID to her relative in the Netherlands. That Webb tweet link still works, although the Instagram link to proof that her relative got the disease does not.
Because this woman was a cyclist, the cycling world took note of this theory, particularly once CHINA started using it to enlarge THEIR theory that the US spread the disease at the Wuhan games.
Here is the link to some excellent coverage of that whole angle by a cycling site:
— The Grinch That Tried To Warn You (@ShoreProgress) May 28, 2021
So Max Wells appears to have made that connection. Here are his tweets:
US Army participates in the Wuhan military games were medically cleared to go to China at Fort Belvoir in Fairfax-Virginia—medical clearances signed by US Army Colonel Edward McDaniel Jr, M.D.—but beyond shockingly yesterday, saw Colonel-Doctor McDaniel and his US Army physician
Let me stop here quickly and save all this stuff for when Twitter takes it down.
Bear in mind that requests for sources from these guys in the replies are not getting answers. Yeah, I get that, too, but just sayin’.
Now – go back to the timeline of “Grinch the Uncancelable” and some awesome stuff from Webb pops up.
If the murdered Colonel McDaniels really did administer the nanoferritin vaccine to the US soldiers going to the Wuhan Military Games, this will be the most bittersweet day of my life. Bittersweet because Task Force is not here to see her validation. pic.twitter.com/1LeLE3Me5L
— George Webb – Investigative Journalist (@RealGeorgeWebb1) May 28, 2021
This might be worth saving:
And yeah, I’ve talked about the Army’s ferritin-based vaccine, which should avoid some of the problems of the full spike protein, by only using PART of the spike protein attached to ferritin – in many ways like the Novavax technology. Yet I am really thinking this Magnet Challenge stuff is a high-quality disinformation meme.
But might the Army have decided to protect its people being sent to Wuhan, if they had intel that the ChiComs were going to infect their people? Sure might be smart to vaccinate them.
Kulacz nailed it about Bavari. I built the story and drilled down to the courier level. There will be Pulitzers for all. Now is not the time to worry about credit. pic.twitter.com/utmvN6YQ5N
— George Webb – Investigative Journalist (@RealGeorgeWebb1) May 28, 2021
At this point, I think we are in a vortex of both information and disinformation. But something interesting is going on.
I encourage everybody to research this topic, bearing in mind that there is much trickery abounding.
Wuhan Lab and Ft Belvoir trying to blame each other for the success of their joint project.
Wherein we examine, in something like “MythBusters” style, the dubious “Magnet Challenge”, without relying (too much) on the anti-scientific crutch of scientific authority
First, a confession.
The main reason I am attracted to these videos of people sticking magnets to the COVID vaccination injection sites on their shoulders, is that I love to watch normal people doing science – EVEN IF they are doing it badly, or just plain wrong.
Second, another confession.
I have a more personal reason for liking these videos. I know exactly what it’s like – as a scientist – to look for a tiny magnetic effect with substandard equipment. To me, that is the essence of science – because our equipment is rarely good enough. It could always be better. Somebody ELSE always gets the Large Hadron Collider “LARGE EURO PROVIDER” – while most of us schmoe scientists finagle “not enough time” on somebody else’s cheap and tiny second-hand machine.
And the problem with magnetism is that some of the effects we are looking for are REALLY TINY. The entire UNIVERSE seems to conspire against finding them. So when I see these people with their refrigerator magnets, trying to come up with a definitive answer to a strange and even downright stupid, but wonderful question – “does the COVID vaccine have something magnetic in it?” – against the combined opposition of media, government, and the chumped “fake science” I used to be part of – well, I’m sorry. I am going to root for the underdogs, even though these people are almost universally doing marginal, problematic, or even face-palmy science.
At the very least, they ARE doing science. And SOME of them are doing what I would almost call admirable “kitchen science”.
Most people – and that can include me – will quickly look for an “authoritative ruling” on a scientific question. Yes, that’s GREAT – but it’s not SCIENCE. It’s “armchair science” – pretty much like armchair anything. There is very little skin in the game – no pun intended. But God bless anybody who says “Hey! Let me see if *I* can figure this out for myself!”
Skin in the game. HELL YEAH.
Indeed, I remember the last time I did some kitchen science – and discovered that – despite the LIES of PBS propagandists – masks were robbing me of oxygen and reducing cognition – MEASURABLY.
TL;DR – skip down to “Crucial Experiment” and read how you can prove to yourself that masks cause real and measurable cognitive decline that lasts long after you unmask. NPR and other leftists who say masks don’t affect you and your children are LYING. LOOK, it’s time to be blunt. Senility – Cognitive Decline – …
SO – what I want to do here – is to follow the “Mythbusters” model – a GREAT pathway into science – and “firm up” the “Magnet Challenge”.
I don’t want to decry it. I don’t want to “debunk” it. I want to make it rigorous, so that we can prove TO OURSELVES whether or not (1) people are getting vaccines which have some kind of “magnetic” component (we’ll firm that idea up), and, no matter what, (2) whether such a thing is scientifically possible based upon known science.
Does that sound fair? Does that sound even-handed?
I’m very open to this weird idea of magnetic vaccines – real or hoax. I would love to find out, one way or another, the answers to these to questions – yes or no. I take as much joy in killing theories, as I do in confirming them. And on the way there, when one side starts winning – “brake” or “accelerator” – I instinctively look for the other one to “challenge” what seems to be winning.
This is how the SCULPTURE of “working theory” emerges from the STONE OF TRUTH. Even if, as may be the case here – that sculpture could be a bit of a Fauci bobble-head.
The Plan
We’re going to do this in several parts. This FIRST ARTICLE will concentrate on the Magnet Challenge itself.
FIRST – we look at the Magnet Challenge as has been seen in videos, and figure out (as you will see) what parts are obviously WRONG.
SECOND – we look at MAGNETISM ITSELF – to get some background on what we need to know to FIX the Magnet Challenge. We want to be comfortable with magnetism before we get down to business.
THIRD – we look at how the Magnet Challenge might actually be fixed. We will only get part-way into that.
In the SECOND ARTICLE, coming in a week or two, we look at “making it real” – and ask a crucial question. Are “magnetic vaccines” even possible? And bigger still – are there ANY “magnetic injections” that people with an agenda might try to implement?
You will be shocked.
Magnetism – which is a bit like the kid sister of electricity – is very much like one of the young female characters in a modern “X Men” saga. She’s under-rated and under-appreciated – until she saves everybody’s ass. I personally think magnetism is beautiful – almost to the point of prejudice. Yeah, if somebody finds convincing evidence of a SORDID, wart-like, unbecoming, magnetic monopole, I will let it convince me. But until then, as far as I’m concerned, the magnetic monopole is sacrilege on the order of gay Jesus porn movies where THE VIRGIN AIN’T. Ugly, wrong, and needless. GROW UP!
Now – I’m not going to get into the theory of magnetism itself, because that is quite unnecessary for the task at hand. Steve is doing a marvelous job explaining (1) mass, force and gravitation, (2) velocity and momentum, (3) energy and potential, and (4) introductory electromagnetism. What I’m doing here is leafing off all of that in a very shallow way, into the magnetism of materials – just a wee bit – so that we can look more critically at how to do science honestly.
We are going to see if – just using GOOD kitchen science – we can figure out how to make BAD kitchen science be a thing of the past.
To quote my new favorite video…..
“Don’t reboot it – just patch!”
Magnet Challenge Videos: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
THE BAD
The FIRST “Magnet Challenge” video that I saw was one of the best examples of “bad science” that I have seen in a long time. “Spock wept”, to put it bluntly.
This is the one where the black-masked, “zaftig”, blonde woman appears to be at home in front of her big-screen television set, having just gotten the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, and “tries” to stick a magnet to both shoulders – first the shoulder in which she got the injection, then the other.
It’s very hard to find this or other videos now, because anti-science, pro-authoritarian, Menshevik Soviet diaper-CEO YouTube has hidden most of them. Even Rumble seems to have hidden most of their Magnet Challenge videos. I did find a source video that includes footage from the original, but I’m saving most of that for below. You will see the video in its entirety then.
Instead, here are some stills. First, the lady showing off the vaccinated arm, with the magnet sticking to the injection site.
Next, the other arm, right before she lets go, and the magnet falls off.
It is immediately obvious to anybody with ANY exposure to science that this woman does NOT, in fact, perform this test in an “equal” way on her two arms. Now I’m not saying that she didn’t observe some difference – that the magnet didn’t behave differently between the two shoulders. What I’m saying is that she didn’t give the shoulders an “equal chance” to either stick or fail.
Is it deception? Is it self-deception? We don’t need to know yet. All we need to know, is that it’s not science.
There is a LIST of differences that can be seen in the video.
To begin with, the lady’s vax arm is held at an outward angle, though toward the camera, making the relaxed angle hard to see. In contrast, her non-vax arm is held in tightly and more nearly vertical at the shoulder, with her forearm across her abdomen.
Next, you can see in the second picture above, that she depresses the “non-vax” magnet with her index finger, guaranteeing that there will be a spring force when she releases it – and yes there is, as she very quickly pulls her finger away, and the magnet flies off.
In contrast, she “babies the magnet” on the vax side, gently holding it up with the middles of several fingers, NOT at the tips, and moving it around AND pressing it lightly and repeatedly for several seconds until it takes hold and STAYS. When it finally sticks to her satisfaction, she lets go gingerly.
This is where I want to STOP THE FILM and talk about how minor of an effect she is presumably looking for. You can literally see how TINY it is by the fact that she’s “babying the magnet” on a shoulder that is less than vertical.
What she is doing is trying to demonstrate an opposition of at least 3 forces:
possible minor magnetism
guaranteed reliable gravity
variable “surface forces”
We all understand that “smooth objects may stick temporarily to skin” – right? Every child who has played around in the bathtub realizes that even a bit of moisture can increase this effect, too. I am not going to get into what those surface forces may be, although they are, down deep, “minor electrostatic” in nature.
“Things stick to things”, shall we just say. Not much, always, but quite a bit, sometimes.
Given this fairly large “minor” effect, plus the reliable effect of gravity that varies with angle, we are not being honest if we FAVOR or DISFAVOR either of those effects – gravity or surface attractions – and also spring forces – on one arm versus the other, while using a metric of “falls off or doesn’t fall off”.
She did NOT give it a fair test.
Now – before we go arguing about whether or not there could STILL BE a real effect here, despite her clear BIAS toward “magnetic vaccination”, let’s look at some AWESOME kitchen science.
This kitchen science does NOT disprove magnetic vaccinations. What it DOES do is disprove the simplest forms of the Magnet Challenge as being sufficient to prove magnetic vaccination. It is a subtle point, but one that we must keep in mind if we’re being honest and unbiased.
This brilliant “disproof” of the sufficiency of the “Magnet Challenge”, very ironically, was being BLOCKED by the “Brave” browser. While they stopped censoring THIS video, I’m uncertain if they’re still censoring others.
Not only am I incredibly disappointed in the obvious censorship by Brave – I’m delighted to have in hand an example of why censorship of people TRYING to find the truth is always wrong.
I *delight* in using error to show truth – it’s one of THE BEST WAYS to make people smarter. And yet, the CEOs of Brave and YouTube – obviously intelligent people – engage in such censorship. This is what socialism does. People may not think they’re socialists, but they will carry socialist memes like pack animals – as fervently and reliably as if they were committed socialists. Even “anti-socialists” do this, when they behave as controlled opposition.
Here is the video – maybe it will work with your browser. Like I said, it’s working with Brave now.
Now, I’ve included that embed code just on the off chance that your browser will show the video, but if not, then first, here is a picture of Brave blocking the video…..
Now – let’s look at two stills from the video.
First, we see where a guy has “stuck” a key to a place on his arm that is almost certainly unvaccinated – just above the inside of his wrist.
This is all quite brilliant for multiple reasons. He shows the key, and it is a familiar, cheap, non-steel, light metal, probably mostly zinc or aluminum alloy, key. These are never attracted to a magnet, nor can they be magnetized. They ARE light enough to demonstrate surface forces as being comparable to gravity. Best of all, by using a KEY, which will tend to “torque off” if the key is not pointing “down with gravity”, he can show to some extent the direction “down” in the video,
As seen in the video, surface forces are comparable to gravity. This means that if we state, for the vertical axis (think about Steve’s lessons here), that…..
MF + SF >= GF
[magnetic forces plus surface forces UP must be greater than or equal to gravitational forces DOWN]
…..as a condition of testing for the presence of magnetic forces, then we have just shown that this method cannot be used to show the presence or absence of magnetic forces.
SURFACE FORCES ALONE CAN ACCOUNT FOR RESISTANCE TO A FALL.
And it gets better.
Yes. He actually takes it past vertical – demonstrating that the surface forces are SO STRONG that they can resist a certain amount of “peeling force” by gravity.
Thus, we are DONE.
The Magnet Challenge is NOT sufficient to tell us if people got a “magnetic vaccination”.
THE EXPERIMENT MUST BE MODIFIED OR REPLACED.
And YES – we will get to that in a minute. But first…..
THE UGLY (YET BEAUTIFUL)
Remember that I found a stashed version of the first video of the blonde lady on Bitchute? That bigger stashing video was actually an episode of Del Bigtree’s The Highwire show, with host Jefferey Jaxen, and reporter Carmen Estel of “Mom on the Street”.
In addition to Jefferey providing a good short compilation of some of the prior videos, Carmen actually wandered out onto Laguna Beach and tested a variety of young people. She got 15 people who had gotten vaccines to try the magnet test on their injection site. Out of 15 people, for 6 the magnet “stuck” and for 9 it “did not”.
Go ahead and watch – see what you think.
It was ALMOST good science – but not quite. The attempt was beautiful, but it was still a bit ugly.
The one thing that would have made this experiment actually meaningful, would have been to do a CONTROL EXPERIMENT on the NON-VACCINATED ARM of each participant.
This would NOT have made the experiment perfect, or even good – it would have made it BETTER.
And THAT is where we need to go next. How could we test for a “magnetic vaccine” using “kitchen science” if we really wanted to “do it right”?
Let’s go MYTHBUSTERS.
MythBusting Magnetism and The Human Body
MythBusters is a fascinating part of “Fake Entertainment” that looks at “urban legends and myths” and tries to see if (1) the legends and myths are true, and (2) if not, can the legends and myths be MADE TO BECOME TRUE by “improving” the myth, using better, smarter, or more modern technology.
MythBusters is still a part of “fake science” – mostly by omission. The MythBusters team is not allowed to pursue certain topics or answers, due to pressure by government, industry or activist groups.
Don’t believe me? Try this.
Thus, certain myths are allowed to be debunked, but others are maintained by omission. Most of all, TRUE “myths” are kept in “myth status” by not allowing them to be examined. This is a key part of “fake science”.
Nevertheless, MythBusters does wonders for science. Most of all, the show promotes the true scientific foundation of free and honest inquiry by “normal people”. And while THEY cannot pursue everything, WE (almost) CAN.
We will begin OUR “mythbusting” of vaccine magnetism with even greater freedom than MythBusters, because we will pursue truth regardless of the desires of government, industry, and activist groups.
Let’s start with MRI – Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
One of the most important things you can realize about strong magnetic fields, like those in an MRI machine, is that their danger profiles for metal objects VARY with the SIZE, the COMPOSITION, the SHAPE, and the PLACEMENT of the metal objects.
BIG iron and steel objects like oxygen tanks and floor polishers are extremely dangerous, because they have a lot of IRON and a lot of weight. The forces produced upon them by a strong magnetic field are tremendous. A human being holding onto the object, or in the way of it, is in great danger.
Intermediate sized objects – especially guns – pose intermediate dangers. They tend to get yanked from holsters and fly against the machines, where they can’t be removed until the machine is turned off.
Smaller FREE objects can become missiles, by the field doing WORK on them, to accelerate them to dangerous velocities.
https://youtu.be/ug3e9W5H0jI
You see that title – “WHY ABSOLUTELY NO METAL SHOULD ENTER AN MRI ROOM”? Well, I’m here to tell you, it’s not true. MRI technicians DO let metal into MRI rooms – they are just VERY CAREFUL about what metal goes in and comes out. You will see.
In fact, on the other end of the spectrum, a small implanted metal object – depending upon the SHAPE and LOCATION in the body – may not be dangerous at all. This is why MRI techs ask very detailed questions about possible internal metal objects.
Thus, when “Mythbusters Kari” was injected with an RFID tag containing a ferrite-core antenna, and was stuck into an MRI machine, the tag was NOT heated up, nor was it ripped out of her. In fact, she didn’t notice anything.
This is because the ferrite in the antenna is smaller than a grain of rice, and it is located inside a strong object, located in a structurally strong part of the human body. The total magnetic force on the object, even under a huge magnetic field, is miniscule compared to the weight of a human arm or leg, or to the strength of human skin, flesh, and bone. The small object is happy to remain exactly where it is, without pain or injury.
Even older pacemakers can be happy in older MRI machines, when run properly.
I was surprised to learn, when I got an MRI, that I could NOT wear a necklace, but I could wear my wedding ring, regardless of material. If you think about it, this makes sense. One object (the wedding ring) was slightly outside the machine – the other (the necklace) would not have been. One object (the wedding ring) was firmly held in place by a heavy body part which normally withstands strong forces – the other was not. One object (the necklace) had the potential to fly around and break or tear under the field – the other did not.
Note that both the MRI machine itself AND the little ferrite-core antenna illustrate an important yet very simple principle of magnetism – the idea that “bringing lots of little magnets together” creates a stronger and stronger field. That works in reverse, too. Break the magnet apart, into separate smaller magnets, and the field of each gets weaker and weaker.
The implications here are simple, and are directly related to the experience of MythBuster Kari, who had a SINGLE UNIFIED magnetizable body placed within her. One little “big” magnet.
A REAL “magnetic vaccine” is going to experience no more force than an RFID with a ferrite core antenna, in terms of reacting to a larger magnetic field. Nobody who got a COVID vaccine, even if it was chock full of iron or ferrite nanoparticles, is going to experience anything “ripping out of them” in an MRI – much less next to a rare earth refrigerator magnet. The real question is whether EITHER a real magnetic vaccine or a small magnet placed next to it would experience any visible force AT ALL.
Thus we KNOW that we should expect a VERY SMALL FORCE IF ANY, from ANY type of “magnetic” vaccine. It’s not going to be “magnetically dangerous”.
Yes – a steel razor blade embedded next to one’s aorta might be one thing under an MRI. But small, blunt, magnetizable implants, located in “safe” places where they are strongly supported, are not going to be trouble.
This means that if we are dealing with a SMALL PERMANENT MAGNET – even a small but powerful rare earth magnet – instead of the MRI machine, we are not going to expect a HUGE reaction with any kind of metal under somebody’s skin, or bigger still, if it’s deep in their arm muscle.
And further still – if it is a SMALL effect, we need to start asking EXACTLY HOW SMALL? Is it even going to be visible?
AH – now we’re ready to do REAL SCIENCE. More or less. We will start off with some background, and then get increasingly into “kitchen physics”.
Real Fieldwives of Magnetism
You may not realize it, but pretty much everything reacts to a magnetic field. Most people are only familiar with what reacts VISIBLY to a magnetic field – that being certain objects containing iron, as well as those containing a few less common elements with similar “ferromagnetic” properties
But the truth is, anything with charged parts somewhere in it, on it, or around it, can react with a magnetic field – and EVEN the lowly, fundamental, neutral neutrino, MAY interact with magnetism, by non-standard mechanisms – making the potential magnetic properties of neutrinos a field of study – and (IMO) much more likely to be real, than the horrid chimera of broken theory known as the magnetic monopole.
I don’t want to get too deeply into the kinds of ways that matter responds to magnetic fields, because one really can’t do it without leaning heavily on more obscure aspects of quantum mechanics, but several classifications of response are very useful in understanding what is going on.
Ferromagnetism – is the familiar response of IRON, many types of steel, adjacent metals cobalt and nickel, and other substances like magnetite (lodestone) or chromium dioxide, which can be MAGNETIZED to some degree. These are substances which REALLY LIKE to be in a magnetic field, and to even form permanent magnets themselves.
Paramagnetism – is the property of many elements and substances which have what are called “unpaired electrons”. It is in the same direction as ferromagnetism – meaning such things LIKE to be in a magnetic field. However, paramagnetism is MUCH weaker than ferromagnetism. In fact, it is very difficult to measure, sometimes, because TINY ferromagnetic impurities and contaminants can and will throw off measurements of paramagnetic substances.
Diamagnetism – is the property of things with fully “paired” electrons. It is the “default” magnetism of most things in this world. It is generally extremely weak, and it OPPOSES a magnetic field. Thus, diamagnetic substances want to LEAVE a magnetic field. They repel either end of a magnet – although weakly. Diamagnetism is also difficult to measure properly because of ferromagnetic and paramagnetic impurities.
Now – I want to take a small DETOUR into diamagnetism.
Visible Diamagnetism
Except for a few geeks here, most of you have probably never seen visible diamagnetism before. You could even call it “anti-magnetism”. The reason most have never seen it, is not only because it is weak, but also because unlike common visible [ferro]magnetism, which only needs one common element – IRON – simple visible diamagnetism with objects requires MORE – in most cases THREE more elements. In what follows, we will be seeing very powerful iron-boron-neodymium magnets being repelled by bismuth and graphite – two substances with so much diamagnetism, it can become easily visible.
Here is a beautifully simple demonstration of how water – which is weakly diamagnetic – is repelled by a magnetic field – in this case provided by a strong, modern, permanent Nd-Fe-B magnet.
There are very cool videos of something called diamagnetic levitation. Sometimes these are actually demonstrations of “diamagnetic repulsion being used to stabilize magnetic levitation“. There is a difference, and I want you to understand it. I find that understanding the differences HELPS to understand magnetic effects in general – both diamagnetism and paramagnetism/ferromagnetism.
Here is a table-top demonstration of PURE diamagnetic levitation.
This is a diamagnetic substance – the graphite in an ordinary pencil lead – being pulled down by gravity into a strong magnetic field generated by powerful diametrically magnetized permanent magnets. As the graphite is pulled down, the diamagnetic response of the material increases until it balances gravity. This is simple, pure, diamagnetic repulsion from a magnetic field.
Now, let’s see what one can do with that in a laboratory.
Yes. That frog experiment led to an IgNobel Prize, but the same investigator later got a Nobel Prize for his investigation of a diamagnetic champion – graphite – which he was able to reliably study as 1-layer-thick graphene – which substance is changing the world.
Better yet, this frog experiment is explained as part of a VERY nice explanation of the different kinds of magnetism:
Now – there are also some great pictures and videos of diamagnetic substances “floating” above strong ferromagnets.
Here is a video of it – again – pure diamagnetic levitation – resistance to falling into a magnetic field.
There are other much cooler pictures, however, that are NOT ALWAYS pure diamagnetic levitation. The following three pictures show permanent magnets floating above highly diamagnetic “pyrolytic graphite”. These pictures MAY BE somewhat pure diamagnetic levitation, but it is likely that they are using a “lifter magnet” somewhere above the picture – not only to lift the floating magnet to some extent, but to help stabilize it from moving off the center of the diamagnetic surface.
To understand that physics, go HERE, to the video below, for a great amateur demonstration.
What you will see is diamagnetic repulsion being used to stabilize magnetic levitation.
What this apparatus does is create a little energetic valley between the bismuth poles. Magnetic levitation wants to pull the little magnet up to the bigger magnet above – but diamagnetic repulsion fights against both gravity going DOWN and the magnetic attraction going UP. At just the right amounts (a small range) of magnetic force UP, everything balances in stable levitation.
It’s not as easy to SEE the diamagnetic repulsion / levitation in this case, but again, there are three forces involved – gravity, magnetic attraction, and diamagnetic repulsion.
In the pencil lead demonstration, gravity forces the diamagnetic substance down into the magnetic field until the opposing diamagnetic repulsion balances gravity, creating stable levitation. Similarly for the graphite disk floating over the array of cube magnets.
In this last demonstration, that same sort of repulsion, in reverse, happens at the bottom bismuth plate, but to get better “lift”, the floating magnet is both lightened and center-stabilized by a lifter magnet. A SECOND bismuth plate keeps the floating magnet from going UP to the lifter magnet.
Though if you hanker for the beautiful simplicity of PURE diamagnetic levitation, click this link for 2 awesome videos and 5 images.
NOW – back to REAL LIFE and the question of “magnetic vaccines” – but passing through MORE considerations of different “magnetic” substances.
Visible Paramagnetism
Most “refrigerator magnets” available until recently have been ferrites – which are ferromagnetic ceramics similar to magnetite (lodestone). They are fairly strong ferromagnets, but nothing extraordinary. However, more and more, refrigerator magnets are now neodymium-iron-boron, a.k.a. neodymium magnets. Those are the little, very powerful magnets.
In the above photo, bigger and stronger neodymium magnets are being used to ATTRACT copper (II) sulfate (a.k.a. cupric sulfate) on a balance beam, turning the beam TOWARD the magnet, because cupric sulfate is net PARAMAGNETIC. On the other hand, the same magnets will REPEL the bismuth, which is net DIAMAGNETIC, and make the balance beam rotate AWAY from the magnets. Note that the coinage metals – copper, silver and gold – are all diamagnetic, although less so than bismuth. However, many other metals, if not ferromagnetic, are still paramagnetic. Aluminum, for example, is paramagnetic.
I will show you a great video of the above experiment in just a moment. But before that, I want to encourage YOU to do some science.
Do you have any of those really strong little magnets? (CHECK #1)
Do you have any bismuth bird shot? (CHECK #2D)
Do you have any pencil leads? (CHECK #2D)
Do you have any iron supplements in capsules or pill form? (CHECK #2P)
Do you have any copper sulfate crystals (root killer granules)? (CHECK #2P)
Do you have any magnesium or calcium supplements? (CHECK #2d)
Do you have any multivitamins with or without iron? (CHECK #2dp)
If you answered YES to question 1 and any of questions 2 with CAPITAL LETTERS, then you can actually do the same experiment on your kitchen counter, without a fancy apparatus. What you are doing IS an experiment just like the Magnet Challenge, only you are READY for very small effects, and have SOME IDEA of what a positive or negative result will look like. Questions 2 with small letters are going to be control experiments.
First of all, be careful with the iron supplements and the copper sulfate. Both are mildly poisonous! Keep iron supplements away from kids, especially. Please handle copper sulfate carefully, too. Avoid touching the crystals, and wash your hands or anything that touches it.
What I simply want you to do is to very carefully and gently “dog” each of these things – pills, capsules, crystals, pencil lead, bismuth bird shot – on a FLAT, SMOOTH, LOW-FRICTION SURFACE – like a clean kitchen counter-top or glass range – with a neodymium magnet. Bring the magnet close – closer – closer still – and see what happens.
SPOILER: I will discuss the results below. Do the experiment now, or after the video below.
Here is the GREAT video that shows you what forces to expect.
SPOILER – are you ready?
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
You should see some attractive motion with the iron supplements and the copper sulfate crystals. NOT MUCH, but enough to realize that YES – paramagnetism is REAL, and careful kitchen science will reveal it. And if your magnets are strong enough, you may even see repulsive diamagnetism from the bismuth and the pencil lead.
You will most likely NOT see any motion of the controls – the magnesium or calcium supplements, or the multivitamins. All of these will be mostly diamagnetic, although it is possible that the iron-containing multivitamin may be weakly paramagnetic overall. I could not get mine to budge.
Can you think of any other things you could test? Metal salts are likely to be either invisibly diamagnetic or visibly paramagnetic. Metals themselves are likely to be paramagnetic, although some are diamagnetic. Certain ROCKS are actually ferromagnetic – notably jasper and serpentine – due to the presence of ferromagnetic iron oxides. They will be strongly drawn to a magnet.
You can always TEST things and then look up the magnetic susceptibility of whatever you just tested on the internet. This will prevent any BIAS from creeping in.
Now – where does this leave us?
Well, we’ve seen what these small but powerful magnets do with diamagnetic and paramagnetic substances, and it’s NOT MUCH.
What about ferromagnetic substances?
Visible Transdermal Ferromagnetism
We are now starting to get very close, conceptually, to the “Magnet Challenge”. We are getting used to the idea of very weak forces, and the difficulties in detecting them – particularly with CRAPPY EQUIPMENT.
If you are already thinking “What I saw with iron supplements – barely rolling or sliding on a countertop when a strong magnet got really close – no WAY would I be able to see THAT little force moving a much heavier MAGNET on somebody’s shoulder”, then you are now beginning to realize that the Magnet Challenge is being challenged. But it’s still not disproven by any means. Because NOW we will bring in ferromagnetism – which is much stronger than paramagnetism.
Watch THIS video to begin to see forces that COULD not only move, but maybe even hold up a magnet.
Note that this guy’s implanted magnet is UNDER THE SKIN – not deep in muscle. That would make a HUGE difference in terms of any magnetic test. We can’t be definitive about the “Magnet Challenge” at this point, because we don’t know the strength of the fields from the test magnets, the types of magnetic substance allegedly deposited, or the depth, but we DO know that the depth matters – a LOT.
Now – the first thing that probably surprised you is that he found that much “iron” in sand. That iron is not IRON METAL per se – or at least not much of it is metal. It is mostly RUST (Fe2O3) and MAGNETITE (Fe3O4). If you’ve ever panned for gold, then you know that sand of all kinds contains a LOT of “black sand” – magnetite – and THAT is probably most of what he had on his finger in the video.
Magnetite – like lodestone – is an example – a NATURAL example – of a ferrite – a mineral or ceramic metal oxide where the metal is mostly or completely IRON.
SO – we can now begin to think that IF a vaccine deposited a FERROMAGNETIC substance – IN ENOUGH QUANTITY – and close enough to the skin – then MAYBE it could visibly affect a magnet brought close to the skin.
Now – before I got “geeky” on this, I simply tried a test. Yes – *I* tried the Magnet Challenge. It’s true, I never got a COVID vaccine, but I get lots of vaccines in my shoulders. Maybe one of THEM was injecting me with something magnetic. It was worth a test – right?
I can tell you this much. As far as I can tell, NO SHOT in my vaccination history has deposited anything in EITHER ONE of my shoulders, which interacts “human-detectably” with my neodymium refrigerator magnets. These are the SAME MAGNETS that can demonstrate the paramagnetism of iron supplements – both ferrous sulfate and ferrous glycinate. But if I “baby” the magnets on my shoulders – all over – I get nothing perceptible.
Now – granted – my fingers are not, in my scientific opinion, sensitive enough to pick up a paramagnetic effect like the drawing of the neodymium magnets to the iron supplements. Thus, my touch would not pick up too weak a ferromagnetic effect on a neodymium magnet. Likewise, my eyes are not sensitive enough to see those magnets reacting in an equal and opposite way to the iron supplements. But maybe they could pick up something stronger.
An easy way to see how neodymium refrigerator magnets react with a small amount of a ferromagnetic substance is to use a standard household staple. Unlike construction staples you get at Lowes, or office staples you get at Staples, household staples are fairly small. A box of 5000 of them weighs 0.38 pounds, including the box. Ignoring our allowed deduction of the paper box weight (we’re generous), that works out to 34.5 (heck, let’s call it an even 35) milligrams per staple.
The staple is made of zinc-coated steel, with the steel being mostly iron and carbon. But we’ll be generous, and pretend like it’s ALL IRON.
Thus, we are going to attribute whatever we see that staple do, to 35 mg of iron, when it could be a smaller amount of iron and even stronger. We’re being CONSERVATIVE in gathering our “expectations of metallic iron as normal, magnetic steel”. But you will still see that the rough numbers are very powerful.
First of all, let’s look at why I was so delighted that the staple comes in at around 35 mg. It turns out that my exemplary iron supplements contain roughly 30 or 60 milligrams of elemental iron, as either ferrous bis(glycinate) or ferrous sulfate, both paramagnetic. Thus, the amounts of iron are comparable, and we can compare the differences in forces between paramagnetic and ferromagnetic iron DIRECTLY, without adjusting the scale.
First, let’s look at MAX MAGNETISM.
If you let the magnet approach the staple, the staple will FLY TOWARD THE MAGNET at a distance of roughly 1.5-2.0 centimeters – basically 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch. Once in contact with the magnet, the staple is strongly held.
How strongly? Well, we can actually measure that. The staple, stuck through a sheet of A4 paper (comparable to 8.5 x 11), will easily hold the single sheet of paper against gravity. Will that scale up? First, I tried 10 sheets – NO DICE – gravity wins. But if I tear off sheets of paper slowly, at 8 sheets of A4, my neodymium magnets will still hold all that paper against gravity through the attraction of a SINGLE staple.
If I weigh those 8 sheets, it comes out to between 30 and 40 grams on a cheap postal spring scale. Let’s just call that 35 grams for super-duper convenience.
What this means is that magnetic forces on a 35 mg staple by that neodymium magnet are roughly 35,000 mgs, where we are being really horrible about pretending that mass is weight and vice versa, “because Earth”.
Stated differently, the magnetic force on the staple is roughly 1000 times the gravitational force on the staple.
And YES – we can really work with that. Holding up 8 sheets of paper is EASY KITCHEN SCIENCE. Much easier to demonstrate than rocking a capsule on a counter.
NOW – here is the real kicker.
Wouldn’t it be great if I could put that staple under my skin and see how my magnet reacted to it? It might be painful, but all in the name of science – right?
WELL, it turns out that you don’t HAVE to “get a piercing“. You can FAKE IT really easily.
Neodymium Head Fakes and Phony Implants
Because humans have SO MANY thin places and opposable body parts, it is not hard to FAKE the implantation of ferromagnetic substances, and then actually STUDY how a magnet behaves near them.
Well, I did this, and what I found – very SHOCKING – is that it is EXACTLY like you would imagine it in the “Magnet Challenge”. Or maybe even STRONGER.
The magnet will “do stuff”, and you will go “WHOA!”
You can PINCH a staple easily between finger and thumb, so that it is more than “skin deep”, and then move a magnet around the pinched fingertips. You can be very rigorous about maintaining a strong pinch, and insure that the metal is a certain number of millimeters “deep” in the pinch. You can control the magnet to see exactly how it behaves. And you can repeat this – OVER and OVER – looking for “tells” that the staple is there.
In my experience, the presence of something affecting the magnet was unmistakable.
Want to get that staple REALLY deep? Put it on the web of your thumb and index finger, and “close it up”.
I was able to make the staple so deep that I could not “feel it there” with a single neodymium magnet. BUT – and this is very cool – with a stack of SIX neodymium magnets, I could easily get the stack to “attract” to the deep staple in a way that I could FEEL WITH MY FINGERS. I could make the stack of magnets slow down – slide more tightly – dawdle – stick – and behave EXACTLY like it seemed the people were either FEELING or THINKING THEY WERE FEELING in the “Magnet Challenge” videos.
Do you see what we’re doing here?
We’re doing POSITIVE CONTROL EXPERIMENTS ON THE MAGNET CHALLENGE.
We are showing that what we SENSE is going on in the “Magnet Challenge” videos is a REALITY – likely from years of experience with the realities of permanent magnets in home or office. We’re not saying that the people in the Magnet Challenge videos are correct, because self-deception is very convincing to others, and thus propagates deceit. But we can be certain that there IS a reality of magnetic behavior which both the people in the videos, and we the viewers, are EXPECTING.
Now – do you want to make a prediction about what would happen if we “felt up” MythBuster Kari’s RFID with a neodymium magnet? Do it! I’m about to give you MORE DATA, and then you can either change or STRENGTHEN your prediction.
That gray stuff inside the copper antenna coil? THAT is ferrite. It’s a ferrite antenna core. You can see it more clearly here, in an RFID designed to broadcast body temperature.
It’s not a HARD ferrite like your old-school refrigerator magnets, that hold a magnetization. It’s a SOFT ferrite, designed for an antenna, that changes magnetization easily.
HERE are 4 examples that you can BUY. They were selected for being small enough to fit into an RFID tag used for pets, livestock, or MythBuster gingers.
Hey, that’s pretty wild! The average of 20 and 40 is 30 milligrams – pretty much in the ballpark of both a staple and those iron supplements.
Well SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE!
Gomer Pyle reacts to the size and mass of an RFID antenna’s ferrite core.
These ferrite cores are about the LENGTH and WEIGHT of a folded-down staple, but have a slightly bigger diameter – maybe a few staples bundled.
So what does this mean?
Fixing The Magnet Challenge
We’re now ready to begin thinking about how we might FIX the “Magnet Challenge”.
I’ve given you enough information about the size of ferrite cores, and the real behavior of staples “pretending” to be implants LIKE those containing ferrite antenna cores, that you are probably guessing – like me – that we might be able to find Kari Byron’s RFID implant by “babying a magnet” over her bicep and “feeling” for a response.
We could likely convince OURSELVES that the “challenge” potentially works, if it is ACTUALLY given the proper things to work with, by judicious and honest application of a strong permanent magnet under sensitive observation, to an actual ferromagnetic implant.
The problem is, of course, that the tiny response of the magnet to an embedded staple is just not all that convincing unless you do it yourself. An RFID tag is almost certainly comparable. Sure, you can “baby the magnet” and an honest observer may be able to tell that it’s “sticking” a little bit, but that simply doesn’t have VIRAL convincing abilities.
Well, there was ONE MORE staple experiment that I did, that I didn’t tell you about – YET. It gives away the most important “fix” of all – which is not so much at the MAGNET end, but at the HUMAN end.
Yeah, if you ask me, men don’t look all that great in earrings – and if they’re CLIP-ONS – egads. Is there anything LOWER than clip-ons?
SO, this Junkyard Wolf tried to see if he could pretty himself up with a staple earring, using his moderately weak neodymium magnets. That actually worked – although just barely – and a bit painfully, because the staple preferred to “get close” to the magnet at one end, thus pointing END-ON toward the magnet. This appears to be, in some ways, “flexible diamagnetic shaping” of the field by the flesh and the staple compromising a bit. The magnet can get closer to ONE END of the staple, moving the diamagnetic interference outward from the field, so the system does what it needs to do to reach a lower energy. With a stack of SIX neodymium magnets, the staple was downright painful, and the stack of magnets could be used to manipulate the earlobe in a very convincing way. I could actually hang the stack of magnets like a pendant earring, by letting the staple press in very close to the magnets though my earlobe.
It would have looked great on film, but – well – I’m a bit camera-shy lately.
Thus, we are led to the idea that the Magnet Challenge needs to be VISUAL to be convincing – and the visual nature needs to either EXCLUDE other forces (like surface effects), dwarf them (like moving skin around in a way that surface forces simply cannot), or show other VISUAL effects demonstrating a strong induced magnetic field at the site (perhaps by enchaining small magnetized objects like paper clips between the proposed ferrite and the magnet).
Sticking lovely Kari Byron into an MRI machine proved that implanted ferrite-core RFIDs are not “missiles of death and dismemberment” under strong magnetic fields, but it did NOT disprove that such items can be LOCATED manually and qualitatively by smaller, hand-held, strong permanent magnets.
Thus, here are some of the most convincing things that I saw while experimenting with my “positive controls”.
hanging of magnets STRONGLY against gravity, jiggling them to disprove that they are sticking by surface effects. This means “show more stick than the hanging key”. Note that even the magnet FALLING OFF from a true magnetic attraction is very convincing. The RELEASE from a magnetic attraction versus a surface stick is very diagnostic visually. A surface stick “peels”. A suddenly failing magnetic attachment “lets go”.
watching the magnet spontaneously accelerate horizontally and “slap” against skin when fastened to the end of a loosely-held, lightweight, floppy, plastic or paper “holder” of some kind. This motion is unmistakable. Suspending the magnet from a thread would work just as well (I believe Gail suggested this). Static electricity can be disproved if needed in the same video by a negative control to both flesh and magnet using paper, feather, etc.
moving skin by tugging and pulling on the magnet – NOT by pushing. This demonstrates attraction to an embedded object or objects – NOT surface forces
Now – is it possible to get even more “geeky” than that?
Absolutely.
First, let me say that normal “stud-finders” don’t work. To be more exact, they SHOULD NOT work. Nevertheless, I checked, and was pleased that Physics is intact. A common modern stud finder does NOT pick up my staple controls AT ALL – even a BLIP. This is not surprising – most stud-finders are not metal detectors. Even the ones that ARE metal-detecting are looking for steel studs and large steel nails in wooden studs. Small bits of metal like staples are NOISE to such tools.
But what about real metal detectors?
Not sure about you, but I SEE METAL. Copper, to be specific. I also see ferrites – metal oxides with substantial magnetic properties – but not so sure that modern metal detectors would fall for metal oxides, as this would cause a lot of trouble.
Arse Technocratica seems to think that metal detectors don’t find RFIDs.
“Implantable microchips are compatible with MRI machines and are not picked up by metal detectors or airport scanners.”
This does not necessarily mean RFIDs can’t be found by either metal scanners or airport detectors – it may simply mean they are found but rejected at normal settings.
I can tell you FOR A FACT that TSA-style hand-wanded metal detectors CAN (when used properly) pick up a SINGLE STAPLE underneath several sheets of paper. Yes. And not just with the sensitivity turned up to “high”, but on their normal setting.
Bottom line – I’m leaving open the possibility of small ferrite-core metal-wire antennas being detectable using metal detectors and other types of scanners.
HOWEVER – ALL of our theories about RFIDs with ferrite antennas are thrown into the dumpster by ONE PICTURE in that Ars Technica article.
This one.
WAIT A MINUTE. The needle is THAT BIG?
No way.
I consider it IMPOSSIBLY unlikely – that people getting the COVID vaccine were injected with the literal HORSE NEEDLES that are used to place RFIDs in people.
I’m sorry – there is NO WAY that monster needle is getting stuck into the average Joe or Jane getting a COVID vaccination. Not without MASSIVE social reporting of “huge needles” and “incredibly painful shots” which would – OH BY THE WAY – leave a big old lump. Sorry – THAT ain’t happening.
Look at the product:
This is where I say…..
“No way – this is not what people are getting with their Pfizer and Moderna shots. NO WAY. This Magnet Challenge is either total bullshit – or something ELSE is going on. People are NOT getting “chipped” with these big implants. Back to the drawing board”.
Seriously. Something is NOT RIGHT about the idea that people are getting “chipped”. A chip implant would be one of those little glass jobs with an antenna. Whatever is happening – it’s not THAT.
SO – if people are not getting what amount to “publicly known science” of RFID tags, with little ferrite antenna cores that MIGHT attract a magnet, what else could they possibly be getting that might still draw a magnet?
LET’S INVESTIGATE.
That will be the NEXT part of this series.
Stay tuned for Part II, in which we will examine the shocking REAL science of “magnetic” medicine, biotechnology, and nanotechnology, and how it COULD indeed relate to “magnetic vaccines”.
W
Stay Tuned For Part II…..
Referenced Discussions
We had numerous discussions of this topic on the site – here are the big or important ones. Please see them for extensive discussions and early attempts to understand the magnetization phenomenon.
Give them nothing but one more day to rue, and the wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Remain CIVIL and possibly even GENTEEL.
Today, in our VERY SPECIAL Wolf’s Mole Day issue, we have FIVE SHORT LESSONS in politically incorrect WOLFTHINK.
What is a Mole?
Before we ask What is “Mole Day?”, let’s ask: What is a “mole”?
Think of the idea “a pair” (2) of shoes, or “a dozen” (12) eggs. Increase a dozen by 1 to 13 (“a baker’s dozen”) of bagels or doughnuts. Increase to 144 for “a gross” of bottle rockets to celebrate the 4th of July.
You will see that named numbers useful for MEASURING QUANTITIES OF THINGS are “a thing”. They are “convenient numbers”. Now, while dozens, baker’s dozens, and grosses of those things aren’t really all that tied to physical realities, PAIRS of things are strongly related to biology – the fact that so many living organisms have BILATERAL symmetry, so “things” appear in pairs, and thus “pairs” become a thing – a useful thing to talk about.
Still with me? Yeah, it’s fluffy. Just go along and you will enjoy the fluffiness and tastiness, and maybe even some “empty calories”, of the mental cotton candy.
Now a DOZEN is actually a useful number (12) because it is so DIVISIBLE by common lower numbers, i.e. by 2, 3, 4 and 6. So UTILITY doesn’t have to be just physically rooted – it can be rooted in mathematics, finance, money, and/or stuff like that.
A MOLE is like a scientifically useful version of the dozen or pair. A mole is the number of atoms of carbon-12 that weighs exactly 12 grams. Once that number was decided, the number was fixed.
The number is 6.02214076 × 1023
This number is also called Avogadro’s number, the Avogadro number, the Avogadro constant, etc.
Now that seems very simple, but one is bound to ask the question “12 and 12 – WHY?”, and that is a great question, but before we answer it, I want to clarify some things about the basic relationship – the definition – that will make you go “AHA!”
First, we repeat:
A mole is the number of atoms of carbon-12 that weighs exactly 12 grams.
Here is what that necessarily implies, mathematically:
if a GRAM ITSELF were different, a MOLE would be a proportionately different number
if the NUMBER OF GRAMS of carbon we chose were different from 12, then a MOLE would be a fractionally or multiply different number
if we chose a DIFFERENT element / isotope and used its matching number (say, 235 grams of uranium 235, a MOLE would be a SLIGHTLY different number, because of nuclear binding energy differences
All of that should help you see this basic point – the NUMBER of grams was PICKED so that “a mole of something” would make the number of grams match its atomic weight, roughly, and centered most strongly on carbon 12, the most common isotope of carbon.
A MOLE is a convenience number for roughing it. Thus, 12 grams (1 mole) of carbon (mostly isotope 12) and 32 grams (2 moles) of oxygen (mostly isotope 16) will react to give 44 grams (1 mole) of carbon dioxide, which has a “molar mass”, and a “molecular mass”, of roughly 44.
A mole (6.02214076 × 1023) makes the number of moles come out conveniently, just like a pair makes the number of legs, arms, eyes, and weapons-grade ta-tas come out conveniently.
We will forever thank WHEATIETOO for the hilarious term “WGTT”!
FOUR could be a “pair” for cows, and then cows would have a pair of legs and a pair of udders, but even for cows (no pun intended), you can see that having a pair be TWO is more convenient, because there are fewer instances of “fractional pairs”, as eyes, horns, and snorting nostrils would have to be.
SO – a “mole” of something is a LOGICAL NUMBER. And “Mole Day” was an educator’s fun way to celebrate this LOGICAL THINKING.
For more information, and a more professional explanation, try HERE:
What Mole Day is NOT, is any kind of celebration of STINKY DIAPER and other such refuse that sneaks into positions of power, influence and especially SPY AGENCIES and then undermines them.
YUCK!
No, we’re going to talk about the celebration of LOVABLE, HUGGABLE MOLES!
Wikipedia actually has a good description of what “Mole Day” is.
Mole Day
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mole Day is an unofficial holiday celebrated among chemists, chemistry students and chemistry enthusiasts on October 23, between 6:02 a.m. and 6:02 p.m.,[1][2] making the date 6:02 10/23 in the American style of writing dates. The time and date are derived from the Avogadro number, which is approximately 6.02×1023, defining the number of particles (atoms or molecules) in one mole (mol) of substance, one of the seven base SI units.
Overview
Mole Day originated in an article in The Science Teacher in the early 1980s.[3] Inspired by this article, Maurice Oehler, now a retired high schoolchemistry teacher from Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin, founded the National Mole Day Foundation (NMDF) on May 15, 1991.[3]
Many high schools around the United States, South Africa, Australia, and Canada celebrate Mole Day as a way to get their students interested in chemistry, with various activities often related to chemistry or moles.[3]
The American Chemical Society sponsors National Chemistry Week,[1] which occurs from the Sunday through Saturday during which October 23 falls. This makes Mole Day an integral part of National Chemistry Week.
So there you have it.
Today is MOLE DAY, celebrating the number 6.02×1023 at 6:02 AM to PM on October 23rd.
It’s that simple.
In Praise of Fellow Critter Mole
Normally, Wolf finds Mole to be either PESKY or TASTY, depending upon his mood. However, on Mole Day, Wolf recalls fondly his youthful admiration for Mole, before an asteroid called FAKE SCIENCE struck the giant Turtle upon which humanity lives.
Shortly after Fake Science struck, The Wicked Witch of The West, Nanzi Pelosi, with her Flying Monkeys of Global Warming, took Professor Molenium hostage, and promised to burn up all of Kalifornistan with wildfires, if the leaders of all the scientific organizations didn’t implement Critical Race Theory and Settled Science.
So here we are.
On Mole Day, Wolf remembers when science actually WAS real, and not decided by treasonous media and “white guilt”, another fine product of CCP brainwashing. He remembers when nobody cared whether Mole was White Hispanic Mole, Black White Supremacist Mole, or A Really Large Number (6.02×1023).
Ah, those were the days.
Mole was a Fun Guy back then – totally devoid of color.
Wolf will try to remember him that way. Or her. Whatever.
Vaccines, Nanotechnology & Reality
Wolf got a hot tip from his friend Mole, that Molenium Magazine, a.k.a. Chemical & Engineering News, had a great article about COVID-19 vaccines, which Mole knew that Wolf was interested in. Oh, boy, you can say that again. As soon as Wolf read the article, he understood not only why “Trump vaccines” are going to work, and why the ChiComs stole that Harvard Nanotechnology guy for their Thousand Talents of Silver program – he ALSO understood why the #WuMao on Twitter and elsewhere are pushing extremely bogus ideas about nanotechnology and vaccines on Trump’s base, to dumb us down and try to defeat Trump.
NOPE. Wolf has to do something about NASTY NANZI and her NASTY CHICOMS. Or maybe it’s Nasty ChiComs and THEIR Nasty Nanzi. Either way.
AGAIN.
Allow me to explain.
The ideas that you need to understand why TRUMP VACCINES WORK are very simple, but they expose a lot of DECEPTION, and that part is COMPLICATED.
First, viruses ARE nanomachines. Viruses ARE little robots. They were designed by nature, which was designed by God.
If you used REAL nanotechnology (called chemistry, biochemistry, and molecular biology) to make a little DRONE VIRUS that looks like one but doesn’t actually infect you, you’re not even making a working robot. It’s almost like a SCARECROW of a robot. It’s like a kid in a Halloween costume, and we’re figuring out how to make them actually scary to scare your immune system into BEING A PREPPER.
That is the level of technology the Chinese communists have made you FEAR, when their trolls get online and gin up CONCERN about NANOTECHNOLOGY AND VACCINES. The ChiComs ALMOST HINT that little robots are going to be released by these vaccines, and that they will turn you into a TRANSHUMAN of some kind.
SCARECROWS. That is the level of “robot” we’re talking about.
See how this works? We want antibodies to attack the SCARECROW VIRUS out on its tips of the spike proteins, so scientists figured out how to make it more like a porcupine shape, so they don’t have to put a bunch of aluminum and GARBAGE in poorly working vaccines, that Adam Schiff pretends are not a reality.
Note that such GOOD SCIENCE is the stuff that ChiNazi spies try to STEAL from our researchers. REAL science. GOOD science.
And then they try to make us believe BAD SCIENCE, or better yet, DISTRUST ALL SCIENCE.
Communism did this. COMMUNISM.
AND logic, people. Vaccines are sometimes BAD but they don’t have to be. Vaccines are often GOOD but they aren’t always so. SCIENCE IS REAL – but not like lying Democrats and deceiving socialists will tell you, because socialism has allegiance to itself and not THE TRUTH. Socialism says “believe Tedros and WHO” when both are proven LIARS and puppets of deceitful socialists like the CHINAZIS.
The W.H.O. can be WRONG, DECEIVED, or LYING. Susan Wocommie of YouTube pretends that’s not true.
LOGICAL THINKING. Accept the complication of multiple simple truths. It will help us BEAT THESE COMMIES.
Second, there ARE NO little metal or plastic nanobots that race out of vaccines to destroy you, for the exact same beautiful quantum mechanical reasons that Fantastic Voyage and Innerspace are both science fiction and not science.
No matter how many HOT WHITE MAGA LADY DOCTORS tell you things that are just a bit out of their league, those things are not always true – or at least, they’re not COMPLETELY TRUE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZH1Drpnjo
I recommend that you listen to this lady, as far as learning to be SKEPTICAL. Much of what she has to say is very true. Some of it is a bit wrong, or very distant and “hand-wavey”.
Listen to this lady on things like UNKNOWNS of new and untested DNA vaccines, including uncertainties about UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES, which are “NOT POSSIBLE” on paper, but could be realities, like GENETIC INCORPORATION. After all, why are our human genomes LITTERED with viral JUNK? Yeah. There’s that, too. How did THAT happen? Bear in mind that there ARE vaccines which DEPEND on genetic incorporation. Those vaccines use CRISPR-Cas9 technology to EDIT YOUR GENES in T cells.
None of the current TRUMP VACCINES use this KNOWING gene-modifying tech, as far as I know, and I sure would not want MY NAME on any future ones that are not VERY up-front about using CRISPR-Cas9 genetic modification technology or similar, and about the DANGERS of this technology.
Listen to this gal on UNTESTED NEW TECHNOLOGIES like mRNA, which even the Moderna mRNA vaccine scientists ADMIT in their published papers could have unintended consequences because they’ve never been tried on humans on a large scale, and are full of uncertainty. The subtle aroma of CYA just POURS from that part of the scientific papers. They wrote the disclaimers for the ages. Nobody wants to be remembered as Doctor Frankenstein.
Listen to her on DIGITAL TRACKING USING MICRONEEDLE ARRAY TECHNOLOGY, and SURREPTITIOUS CONTRACEPTION, STERILIZATION AND ABORTION. Yup. It’s ALL THERE.
On nanotechnology? Ehhhhhhh, NOT SO MUCH. She’s out of her league, in my opinion. This is where she waves her hands and relies on fear. Yes, TRANSHUMANISM is both a threat and an opportunity, long range. Yes, NANOTECH can and will be abused, no doubt. But not in these specific vaccines, IMO, as far as the active, openly sought, coronavirus vaccines, PER SE.
The nanotech being used NOW in the stated vaccines is actually just advanced biochemistry, bleeding into biology via biophysics. You will see below. It’s very simple, crude, early stuff. I will explain, very gently. And once you understand it, it’s simple, but WONDERFUL.
NOW – this is not to say that REAL quality scientific breakthroughs – like TRUMP VACCINES and TRUMP ANTIBODIES – could not possibly be used to hide LIES and DECEPTION – such as added STERILITY VACCINES and ABORTION ADDITIVES and HUMAN TRACKING NUMBERS (any dye-bearing micro-needle array vaccine will mark you uniquely), because – well – just listen to this lady above, and also below, with Mike Adams to help ferret out the truth.
Good vaccines are KNOWN to have been TAMPERED WITH to inflict ABORTION on unknowing recipients, mostly, apparently, black women in Africa. It’s UGLY and CRUEL and people need to be in PRISON for this stuff.
This is a VERY fascinating interview. What is revealed here is that ABORTION VACCINES are a THING. Not just sterilization vaccines. ABORTION vaccines.
There are GOOD PEOPLE in science, who pursue only TRUTH. They don’t have HIDDEN AGENDAS.
However, there are BAD PEOPLE who try to control science for hidden agendas. Like these.
They may FUND good science for COVER, such as coronavirus vaccine research, but their real interest is their HIDDEN AGENDA, such as surreptitious contraception, abortion, and depopulation. To say nothing of GETTING TRUMP OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE.
OK? It’s going to be COMPLICATED BUSINESS to ferret out the BAD GUYS and KEEP THEM OUT.
The “nanobots” and “nanotechnology” are always the SCARY PAYLOAD of #WuMao anti-vaccine propaganda to dumb you down. BEWARE. They won’t explain it, so you will just FEAR IT.
I’m explaining it, so that you will not only NOT fear it – you will DESPISE and NOT TRUST the Chinese communists who try to deceive you. And so you will not trust ANYBODY WHO HELPS THEM.
Third, the main nanobot action of the COVID-19 virus is for the spikes to CHANGE SHAPE to EXPOSE HIDDEN WEAPONS as well as to deploy DECOYS designed to fool BODILY DEFENSES.
This is INTELLIGENCE. This is SMART. It’s SNEAKY. Evolution was the INTELLIGENT PROCESS used by various viruses to LEARN TO HIDE THEIR WEAPONS from bodily defenses.
We have the explanation of the appearance of vaccine immune enhancement (i.e., a substantial fraction of “failing and dangerous vaccines”) RIGHT HERE. It’s beautiful, and it shows HOW and WHY viruses evolved defenses against the human immune system.
And if you are thinking “Wow, this kind of viral sneakery will only get worse because of the CCP ChiNazis”, then yes – you see the THREAT that the CCP poses, allying not with humanity and LIFE but with CHAOS, LIES and DARKNESS.
One of the most important points from Li-Meng Yan and her two papers is the level of DECEPTION built into the China Virus. The ChiNazis have learned to bury their sneakery under evolution. How cute. This is why HER testimony is so important to the world.
So are you ready to “read along with Wolf”?
Let’s begin.
Back to the start.
Let’s read the title. “The tiny tweak behind COVID-19 vaccines”. This is actually a big deal. Almost ALL of the “Trump vaccines” which are also “Bill Gates vaccines” IN THEORY (very important) are using this “tiny tweak” which FIXES THEM against vaccine immune enhancement.
[ Side Note: A Trump vaccine is a Trump vaccine until you add an ABORTIFACIENT to it, or a DIGITAL TRACKER to it, and then it becomes a Bill Gates vaccine. ]
Vaccine-induced immune enhancement is something that Gail Combs and I have harped on endlessly as a HUGE bugaboo in vaccines, and particularly in coronavirus vaccines. It is the PROBLEM which Communist Democrats REFUSE to admit exists, and – OMG – it was SOLVED for these vaccines.
I am POSITIVE that scientists have FOUND the basic problem and FIXED IT.
SOMEBODY will get a Nobel prize for this stuff. Not a “Noble Prize”. A real NOBEL.
Read the SUBTITLE to begin understanding the KEY MOVE.
Prepandemic coronavirus research by Jason McLellan and Barney Graham led to a trick for stabilizing the prefusion form of spike proteins
This seems like a “tiny tweak”, but it’s not. This “trick” is a major advance in FIXING VACCINES AS A WHOLE. Conceptually, it has opened the DOOR to making VACCINES as SMART as VIRUSES.
NOW do you understand why those ChiCom SPIES are trying to get this stuff?
And it is all NANOTECHNOLOGY. REAL nanotechnology. Not some scary Alinsky boogeyman nanotechnology.
So – let’s look at the problem, using the SAME VIRUS that Gail Combs has been telling us about – the one where the early vaccine KILLED KIDS.
Here is how the “spike-like” F surface protein of RSV CHANGES when it interacts with a cell.
The protein on the left is what it looks like BEFORE it attacks your cells. The one on the right is AFTER it attacks. The disappearing RED ZONE is the part that SHOULD GET flagged by antibodies.
Very ironic (or perhaps I should say VIRONIC) that the protein turns from what looks like a CLOSED KNIFE into what looks like a CLUB.
This is VERY, VERY similar to what happens to the spike proteins of COVID-19 virus:
What this means is that we should NOT be looking for and trying to stop THIS…..
…..because doing so will result in the useless biological law-enforcement cluster-pluck that we know as IMMUNE ENHANCEMENT – which is doing too much, too late.
Instead, we should be looking for and trying to stop THIS:
GET IT?
Going back to the “left-vs.-right” protein pictures above, we want antibodies that seek out and stop what is ON THE LEFT – not what is ON THE RIGHT.
The stuff on the RIGHT is EXPENDED protein. It’s USED BRASS. It’s FIRED BULLETS.
This was ALWAYS the problem with BOTHour bodily defenses AND failing vaccines. They were primarily keying on the WRONG THING. This is why DEAD VIRUS was a fail as a vaccine for so many viruses. The proteins “hair trigger” into their FIRED STATE and the resulting virons don’t work to train the body to spot LIVE VIRUS with UNFIRED PROTEINS.
So how do we get the proteins we need to TRAIN the body correctly?
CRISIS ACTORS!!!
Yes. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. The TRUTH is almost hilarious.
I’m not going to get into the SPECIFIC chemistry of what scientists did to create DUMMY RIGGED SPIKE PROTEINS for your body to take target practice on, but they basically used two approaches, in combination with BLANK ROUNDS.
First, the BLANK ROUNDS part.
The “blank rounds” are the fact that these new Trump vaccines are INCOMPLETE as viruses. There is no complete virus. No matter what principle is used, there is not enough information for a COMPLETE VIRUS. Trump vaccines cannot infect you, unlike “live virus” or faulty “attenuated / weakened” virus vaccines.
In the case of Novavax, you are getting DUMMY RIGGED SPIKE PROTEIN stuck in a FAKE VIRUS BALL, with no RNA to create more of it. This is ultimate scarecrow stuff. Pre-fab scarecrows.
In the case of the others, like Pfizer and Moderna, you are getting DUMMY RIGGED RNA which serves as instructions to make the DUMMY RIGGED SPIKE PROTEIN, but nothing else needed to build the complete virus. These vaccines create the equivalent of the Novavax vaccine “in vivo”.
YOUR body, near the injection site, MAKES the scarecrows.
SO, the main point. How did they create “dummy rigged spike protein” or its instructions? What *IS* the dummy rigged spike protein? Alternatively stated, “how did they make the scarecrow, or the design of the scarecrow?”
They basically used TWO techniques, to make a FAKE spike protein that is LIKE the real thing, but which can’t change shape and “open up”.
One technique was to substitute ANGLE IRONS for hinges.
The other technique was to substitute MOLECULAR VELCRO for smooth chrome plate at key points.
The combination of the two types of MUTATIONS (because that is what these would be in real life – BAD MUTATIONS) utterly SABOTAGES the spike protein. It turns it into a super dud. It cannot “open up” and attack cells. But it’s a DUD that looks exactly like the real McCoy, coming into the fight.
It’s CRISIS ACTORS with BLANKS.
Send ’em in, and let the immune system shoot ’em up for target practice. It’s RUTHLESS.
The first innovation these scientists tried used TWO of the angle iron substitutions – the amino acid PROLINE – and is thus called the “2P mutation“. That is being used in MOST of the Trump vaccines, but not all. The AstraZeneca vaccine (which ran into trouble, BTW) does not use it. It’s not fully certain that the 2P mutation works in ACTUAL VACCINES, but based on reports that the Pfizer vaccine could be approved in November, it is VERY likely that it does actually work “well enough”.
[ PS and hint – it’s always useful to look who casts doubt on key advances in science. Just sayin’. ]
Now, this research is not resting on its laurels – it is ALREADY moving on to better and better crisis actor proteins and / or instructions for the same. Stated more fully…..
WORK IS ALREADY WELL UNDERWAY ON SECOND-GENERATION TRUMP VACCINES.
How do you like THAT?!!!
Here is a new rigged spike protein called “HexaPro” (named after the SIX proline angle irons – the red/blue pentagonal units pointed out in the upper left magnification).
Here is a guide to the picture, for those who are interested in the how the FOUR TYPES OF RIGGING work.
Here is a LINK and a summary – basically the header information from the paper (it’s still HUGE).
The development of therapeutic antibodies and vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is focused on the spike (S) protein that decorates the viral surface. A version of the spike ectodomain that includes two proline substitutions (S-2P) and stabilizes the prefusion conformation has been used to determine high-resolution structures. However, even S-2P is unstable and difficult to produce in mammalian cells. Hsieh et al. characterized many individual and combined structure-guided substitutions and identified a variant, named HexaPro, that retains the prefusion conformation but shows higher expression than S-2P and can also withstand heating and freezing. This version of the protein is likely to be useful in the development of vaccines and diagnostics.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to accelerated efforts to develop therapeutics and vaccines. A key target of these efforts is the spike (S) protein, which is metastable and difficult to produce recombinantly. We characterized 100 structure-guided spike designs and identified 26 individual substitutions that increased protein yields and stability. Testing combinations of beneficial substitutions resulted in the identification of HexaPro, a variant with six beneficial proline substitutions exhibiting higher expression than its parental construct (by a factor of 10) as well as the ability to withstand heat stress, storage at room temperature, and three freeze-thaw cycles. A cryo–electron microscopy structure of HexaPro at a resolution of 3.2 angstroms confirmed that it retains the prefusion spike conformation. High-yield production of a stabilized prefusion spike protein will accelerate the development of vaccines and serological diagnostics for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Dig into THAT if you want to get very close to the state of the art.
Now – here is where WOLF is going to put in a good word for Molenium Magazine, a.k.a. Chemical & Engineering News. This is one HELL of an article. This kind of reporting, and this particular article, should be everywhere. If people knew this stuff, they would realize all kinds of GREAT things.
Not only GREAT THINGS about REALITY, but about the REALITY of great things IN AMERICA.
About GREAT THINGS happening in America.
About the TRUMP VACCINES.
About TRUMP.
And that is exactly why you are NOT hearing about this stuff – ANYWHERE.
Our FAKE NEWS is sitting on the TRUTH about the Trump vaccines precisely because they ARE the “Trump vaccines” – the vaccines that Trump, together with his advisers, pushed for.
And THAT leads me to my next topic. Exactly WHY we’re seeing the TRAVESTY of great science journalism and great science truth being IGNORED and MARGINALIZED in the mainstream.
How China Stole Logic From The West
When I worked in shallow state, I saw – literally, over many years – thousands of jobs shipped overseas, many to China. It was done in a very careful way. Nobody saw THEIR current job shipped to China. Nobody saw their close coworker’s job shipped to China. It was always done carefully, distantly, and invisibly. Sometimes there was a certain amount of “musical chairs” to make jobs come and go in a complicated way, to hide the sending of jobs, but away they went. The jobs that were sent to India were more open, because they were less controversial. But when numbers came out, the numbers indicated there had been a massive loss of “growth jobs” to China.
Jobs going to China were always more hush-hush than jobs going to India or elsewhere.
The thing is, China doesn’t just do this by simply gaining advantage for China. They also insist on hurting America at the same time. It’s HOW THEY ROLL. They don’t just beat America in the race. They make sure America runs a bad race, or is permanently harmed. THAT is China.
THAT is the CCP.
When mainland, PRC Chinese suddenly started working with us, here in the US, the Hong Kong Chinese and Taiwanese who had previously worked for us, began a delicate dance of “situational awareness” and self-protection. This produced a wealth of information, for those who had friends in those groups, who were willing to talk. Not all were forthcoming with information, but some information I got was simply astounding. This information made me watchful, and my vigilant state then PAID OFF BIG-TIME.
One important thing that I began to learn, once made aware of CCP actions in US companies, was how CCP assets in the United States would deniably sabotage US operations. Their work is subtle, and sometimes even hidden by a certain amount of self-deprecation, but it is extremely effective.
A CCP asset doesn’t have to crash a US company by themselves to begin what can become a massive compromise or even downfall. They only need to compromise a small bit of workflow around themselves – possibly while looking good themselves. All they have to do is remove the MARGIN – the EDGE – the BREAK-EVEN – the BLACK INK – of a low-margin but critical group, and they can create the case for outsourcing to China. Combine this with “global-minded” upper management and the inability of lower management to make allegations against skilled players who are ready to use leftist “protection” memes as defenses, and it becomes very difficult to defend keeping operations in the United States.
One example really stayed with me, of how they operate. The CCP asset was a young mainlander with “some computer security experience”, whose pretense of slight incompetence was simply too opportune and skilled to be real, but whose pretense of goofy honesty could disarm almost ANY American.
The way I caught him was almost accidental. There was a certain long-running, weekly, technical meeting which was always a struggle. In its past, it had achieved many useful things, typically resulting from a combination of policy resolutions and creation of enabling new technologies to facilitate the agreed resolutions. Good things had come from all of the members, except a few.
Sadly, this meeting had become notoriously ineffective and rarely produced any worthwhile progress for several years, despite leadership and membership which should have yielded great things. It got to the point where many of us simply joked about the meeting being a waste of time. Many felt that the meeting would likely go away, as it produced nothing.
At one meeting, where a surprisingly worthwhile solution was actually getting traction, I observed that this Chinese guy derailed the discussion by injecting an outdated concern, ironically an older problem mostly with some of the Chinese staff and non-Chinese management, who he was specifically targeting with this concern at the meeting. I was shocked at how effectively this torpedoed the progress of the group on the issue. My old conversations with non-PRC coworkers familiar with PRC tactics came rushing back to mind. This was NOT something they had told me about, but it resembled other tactics that I HAD been warned about.
Knowing what to watch for, I decided to spend less time interacting at this meeting, and more time observing the likely CCP asset. He had a remarkable way of heading off almost ANY productive discussion. It got to the point where I had to (not always successfully) suppress laughter every time he derailed the group. The group leaders, who included many managers and senior technical staff, were utterly oblivious to what he was doing, and sometimes he would even ham it up a bit, as if he was playing a trick on a small child and “having fun with it”.
With this experience, it was not hard for me, more recently, to believe that a CCP cell spread among California graduate students was undermining multiple American universities, by promoting American radicals, when their communications were exposed.
But it gets worse.
I am now convinced that socialist-trained scientists have been LITERALLY trained to “virtue-signal through science”, and thus follow MEDIA CUES on how to TIP their science for psychological rewards.
This is why the CCP always made sure that there was a party political officer in both military and technical units – not so much to apply the STICK of party discipline, but to make sure that the CARROTS which reward VIRTUE SIGNALS went to the right people for the “right work”.
This does not just work on the Chinese – it works on EVERYBODY.
I have mentioned before that I know a number of “East Bloc and Former Soviet Union” emigres, refugees, defectors and escapees. Though most will not describe themselves as socialists, and will even reject the label, they love Bernie Sanders, and support policies that are basically socialist.
THIS behavior fits PRECISELY with what a young Taiwanese friend told me years ago. This friend insisted that mainland socialism just CHANGED people – that it removed parts of their human morality – that it made them socialists, whether they admitted it or not. In the opinion of this friend, the DAMAGE could never be removed, if the person actually GREW UP under CCP socialism. CCP socialist training STAYED with a person.
This is, I believe, how the climate change scam worked. People don’t WANT to admit that they “virtue signal in their practice of science”, but they DO, and socialists KNOW IT. Just like a FIRE can be grown from a small bit of smoking grass into a FOREST FIRE, so a small, politically desired bit of politically useful science can be grown from small to large, first in the Petri dish of a small corner of niche science, then fanned larger and larger with media attention and publisher rewards. Having “comrades” in both the media and science publishing world helps.
It has been EXTREMELY easy to see this in the case of COVID-19, because not only is the COVID “scam” a bit of a rush job, but the CCP narratives have been very obvious.
First let me simply cite the entire hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) travesty, where CCP interference was run mostly through (1) the UN, WHO, and Tedros, (2) science journals which have huge exposures vis-a-vis China and Chinese publisher entanglements, and (3) the pharmaceutical industry, also highly compromised by Chinese involvements. Were it not for the discovery of the murderous LancetGate Effect, wherein people in Switzerland, France and America provably DIED when HCQ was withdrawn and then reinstated, it’s possible that China would have gotten away with undermining a drug THEY were using inside China. Bear in mind – there is evidence that HCQ usage has been both popular AND promoted inside China, at the same time that various FRONT-FACES for China have deniably undermined the drug OUTSIDE of China. That, of course, matches other CCP behaviors, like travel restrictions INSIDE China but not to the outside.
This is simply a PATTERN with the CCP. Get used to it.
My biggest catch here was arguably that FIRST and really BAD scientific paper that ALLEGEDLY first supported masks, at an essential moment in their political advancement, based on terrible US state-by-state data then available. Even disregarding the bad underlying data – the problems of which were not known at that time – the authors committed a shocking number of egregious and grievous scientific sins in order to help prop up the narrative that “masks work”. This has been dealt with elsewhere by other scientists – I just bring your attention to this graph which literally mocks the very idea of “cause and effect” to its face. See if you can see what I mean. “Read the graph”, and see how THEY DID NOT.
The Chinese authors, in an American university, were not “following the data” to see where it led. They were NARRATIVE-FITTING. And this BAD work was in a PRESTIGIOUS JOURNAL.
I’m not claiming these Chinese authors were part of a conspiracy. I *AM* claiming that they were engaged in almost irresistible socialist virtue signalling to a media narrative, according to the known psychology of people exposed to – and trained by – Chinese communism. And, increasingly, by American communism.
It is a subtle difference, between conspiracy and conformity, or really between EITHER ONE and a conspiracy to generate conformity, which IS communism, but it is something that Americans will have to begin to understand, as we begin to pry REAL science from the mouth of the dragon.
Now, if you go out and look for it, you will find all kinds of Chinese science that rushes out to support media narratives on COVID-19. Not universally, but enough. It’s a TWO-WAY STREET. The media will PICK and HIGHLIGHT virtue-signalling work that conforms to its desired narrative, so that “the winner” is not picked by science, but by the media. It really is a sweet scam.
The trouble is, however, that sometimes the “meeting of the narrative” is simply overdone – it becomes ridiculous. In some cases, the CCP will “crow” too loudly over a self-demeaning victim. In others, the victim will rush out SO HARD to the narrative, for virtue signal points, that they self-demean at humorous levels.
Horrible optics indeed.
MASKS are a strong part of this psychology, but it goes far deeper. CCP virtue-signalers will self-debase in the most remarkable ways.
Sometimes you can play along with this virtue signalling for personal advantage. For instance, because my lungs have been damaged by the China Virus, masks give me nasty hypoxia, pushing my limited oxygenation ability over the edge. My solution is to wear a super-dorky face shield INSTEAD of a mask.
People know in their hearts that whatever weird spit-spray-blocking utility masks may have – and there is some, undoubtedly – it is obviously not as strong with face shields. HOWEVER, face shields are far more dorky, stupid, and self-debasing. They are a STRONGER virtue signal than a mask like everybody else is wearing. So by using a STRONGER virtue signal that is less effective but easier on my ultimate victim status as a COVID recoveree, I basically grant myself some “COVID privilege”.
It’s all BULLSHIT – but I go along with it, to go easy on my lungs, and to not give my enemies a chance to generate a conflict scenario, were I not wearing a mask at all.
NOW – let’s get to the biggie – the example par excellence of scientific virtue signalling to China on COVID-19.
This science-world self-debasement is entirely analogous to two art-world analogs – pinnacles of cultural debasement of Western art, those being the “golden anti-Trump toilet” and the “giant artwork vagina of Versailles” – two of the most extreme cultural Marxist societal debasements in existence.
This scientific paper – renamed by Wolf Moon to translate into its CCP-over-USA ChiNazi political reality – is:
“Why Americans should not flush the toilet, to keep from spreading COVID-19”
I am not kidding you.
THIS work is featured in Molenium Magazine (i.e., C&EN) immediately after the same highly worthy work on mutated spike proteins that I just told you about, and that is leading to successful vaccines. Both articles are 3 pages long – yet they tell such different tales.
First, the HIGH ROAD OF SCIENCE – what China steals. Then, the LOW ROAD OF SCIENCE – what China leaves on our doorstep in a flaming bag.
The first article describes vaccine work that can FREE US from the stupidity of COVID-19 lockdowns.
This work, in contrast, is perfectly set up to give CCP-controlled communist Democrats a veritable softball of concern to start regulating our TOILETS in new and even stupider ways than they already have.
“SOLAR TOILET AIR RECYCLING PUMPS [MADE IN CHINA] WORK!”
Yes, I can hear it now. FAKE SCIENCE breeds FAKE TECH while CHINA GETS AHEAD.
Just STOP for a moment and realize how much this is like the ChiCom who derailed our technical meetings with picayune concerns that WORKED on STUPID AMERICANS.
There haven’t been any confirmed cases of people catching COVID-19 through exposure to the virus from feces or urine. But some researchers—and many people who need to find a bathroom while on the road—wonder if public toilets pose an infection risk.
Earlier this year, Yun-Yun Li, Ji-Xiang Wang, and Xi Chen at Southeast University were concerned about this exact question and used computational fluid dynamics models to determine how flushing the toilet can drive water from the toilet bowl into the air. According to their model, a flushing toilet generates a cloud of thousands of aerosol droplets that rises about a meter into the air if the lid is up (Phys. Fluids 2020, DOI: 10.1063/5.0013318). They also modeled how urinal flushing can produce aerosols (Phys. Fluids 2020, DOI: 10.1063/5.0021450). These weren’t the first studies to show that flushing generates aerosols, but the researchers hoped their models might nudge the public to consider bathroom hygiene more during the pandemic.
This picture says it all:
OK, maybe not. Maybe THIS ONE says it all.
The best part? TWO PAGES LATER, a paid insert for a Chinese university, AUTHORED by a staff writer for C&EN.
Look. It’s time to stop being FOOLS. The CCP will DESTROY whatever it cannot be. And it cannot be good, so it must DESTROY good. It is already destroying science with politics. The CCP doesn’t care if the publicly “agreed” climate science is a CROCK. All it cares about is that IT knows the truth, and plans accordingly, while everybody else is MISLED.
The CCP will try to MISLEAD Western science by HOOK or by CROOK. Wake up, and TURN IT OFF.
pic.twitter.com/lUwhXAH7RW
