Should We Be Skeptical of Industry and Media Denials of Use of Graphene Family Nanomaterials in Vaccines?

At this point, I don’t really know the answer to this question. I’ve only been studying it for a few hours. However, given the sordid track record of the Faucisphere in government, the duplicitous alien planet Big Pharma, and that wonderful global organization of medical liars and policy-reversing Tedros types, the United Nations of China, I’m not feeling like giving these sneaky profiteers a clean bill of health just yet.

Let’s just say that I’m still collating.

As both American government and American / Western corporations increasingly act like their Chinese counterparts, I expect to see dog-killing treats with little “Made in the USA” graphics on them very soon, unless we bring the Great Fake Election and Virus Scam of 2020 to a very “judicious” close.

It was only tonight, that I had ever even HEARD of the idea of graphene or its derivatives in vaccines.

This HAD to be a conspiracy theory, I thought. NO. FUCKING. WAY.

Seriously. My immediate thought was “no way”. That would be like putting little molecular razor blades in the little biomolecular apples known as cells. Who the hell would do that shit?

And YES – when I went looking for information about the toxicity of graphene and friends, sure enough, there is a TON of information about it.


If you read that article, you will see that “molecular razor blade” is indeed just ONE of the ways that graphene and coconspirators damage cells, organs, organelles, and anything else that gets in their way.

It’s not like one might not expect that, given that graphene is a bit like asbestos and other inorganic particulates, only flatter and sharper, but you never know – maybe there are windows of low toxicity where things are OK, or at least BETTER. Indeed, such variable CURVES of toxicity are hinted at in the paper above, dependent on the size of the razor blades.

Science! It works! When you’re honest, of course, but if so….. it works!

But back to FAUCISM and why I don’t exactly trust the current “situation”.

After I was sure this stuff actually HAD toxicity issues that one might reasonably expect, I went looking to verify that this business about putting it in vaccines was just a nutty conspiracy theory.

And sure enough, a helpful “ABMG” type (associate of Bill and Melinda Gates- reference HERE) from New York and Forbes magazine assures us that NO – all the conspiracy theories about “graphene oxide” in the Pfizer COVID vaccine are exactly that – DUMB conspiracy theories.


The problem, if you go read this, is that the denial falls a bit flat. As in VERY flat. It reminds me of a variety of failed debunkings. It’s very much like a “Snopes evasion”, if you are familiar with those.

It’s nothing like the following:

“Pfizer kindly gave us three sample vials of their vaccine, which we were allowed to select at random from actual pharmacies and hospitals, with a letter of authorization from the head of Pfizer vaccines. We took these to an independent laboratory skilled in the determination of biopharmaceuticals and nanomaterials, including graphene and its derivatives. Not only were there no components that are not listed on the Pfizer and CDC websites – there was no detectable graphene of any kind, when subjected to known methods of isolating graphenes.”

See? An answer like THAT is “game over”, as Scott here likes to say.

Instead, the answer I got was basically a recounting of the true but mostly irrelevant fact that Jane Ruby is highly unqualified to talk in a deep and expert way about a lot of the things she talks about ANYWAY.

To which I say…..

“Yes, this is true. Back to the question. Please. They aren’t putting this stuff in the vaccines – ARE THEY?”

So I keep reading…… to which I then say…..

“Yes, it sounds like this is a conspiracy theory, and the people who say that the vaccine is 99% graphene oxide – obviously ludicrous – are almost certainly spouting bullshit. But I don’t care about that. ARE THEY putting this stuff in vaccines?”

So I keep reading, and the proof boils down to trusting that the ingredient list that Pfizer originally gave to CDC and FDA doesn’t include graphene oxide, and that Pfizer would never lie to CDC or FDA, because they would get in trouble.

Seriously. Go to the link and read it.

Of course, just because CDC lies like crazy, and FDA is horribly political, and BOTH are beneficiaries of these vaccines, wouldn’t affect what they might say.

Nor the fact that this IS an experimental vaccine where they don’t actually include the list of ingredients in the package for some weird reason, like maybe they would be lying if they did.

I mean, the Fauci People are mostly honest, mostly.

Well, I didn’t get a good answer from the debunking. So I looked elsewhere. THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE.

Surprise, Surprise, Surprise.


Oh! An adjuvant! You don’t say!

And a CARRIER, too! On top of that!

Why, there’s almost no need to stop by Forbes and have a science journalist just miss the fact that scientists find this stuff useful in vaccines, despite – or maybe even BECAUSE OF – its toxicity.

Thank you, Science Journalism! You’re almost as great as the other kinds!



A vaccine that keeps pumping out vaccine for 30 days after you inject it? Holy shit!

A vaccine that stabilizes messenger RNA at body temperature? Holy shit!

A vaccine that can migrate (“translational efficiency”) to the lymph nodes? Holy shit!

Now don’t get me wrong – this is great stuff. This is cancer-curing stuff – using mRNA and hydrogels and adjuvants and graphene oxide – gotta love it. You get CANCER – you might like this stuff.

Of course, if you get that cancer from a graphene oxide-containing vaccine for coronavirus, that might be a different story, but who is gonna profit on both ends of THAT equation? Don’t be silly! Insurance will mostly pay for it, mostly.

Yeah, you know what I’m sayin’.

And what’s REALLY interesting here is how LONG this vaccine lasts, when you use this graphene oxide stuff. I mean, it lasts a LONG TIME. And migrates, too! Even better than the old lipid nanoparticle technology!

Which just kinda seems a lot like the way the Pfizer vaccine lasts a long time in people’s bodies, and now even LONGER on the shelf, maybe TOO long in the body, which is good for gene therapy or cancer treatment, but bad for a disease vaccine, but let’s just ignore that alleged motivation for using a less safe new tech for a vaccine.

What I find interesting is how this graphene oxide stuff seems to STABILIZE the mRNA. Wow! Would that help an mRNA vaccine survive higher temperatures in normal refrigerators, like Pfizer does now?

Silly me just wondering aloud. It’s called a “hypothesis”.

And would Fauci and CDC actually TELL us if they changed the formulation just a little bit?

You see where I’m at?

And it gets worse, because graphenes cause symptoms a lot like COVID in the lungs, but – no – I don’t even want to go there. THAT is really kinda conspiracy theory. Let’s just stick to the simple question.

Is. Anybody. Using. Graphene, graphene oxide, or whatever. In COVID vaccines?

You know what? I don’t know. And I don’t trust government, industry or media to tell us the truth.

Because they all now ACT just like we’re in China. I mean, state media supports state industry.

Think about that.


5 6 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Brave and Free

Another great post Wolf!
NOTHING would suprise me at this point. I’ve been wondering if the vaccines have been changed as we’ve progressed down this road of “everyone ” needs to be Stabbed mentality.


Now we just need to do a version in Dylan’s voice…

They’ll stab ya when you’re at the breakfast table
They’ll stab ya when you are young and able
They’ll stab ya when you’re tryin’ to make a buck
They’ll stab ya and then they’ll say, “Good luck”

Tell ya what, I would not feel so bad
Everybody must get stabbed

Last edited 1 year ago by cthulhu

“as we’ve progressed down this road of “everyone ” needs to be Stabbed mentality.”


The unjabbed stab back… 👍😁

Here’s a video of locals fighting off a whole herd of jabbers.


Inspirational video, I meant… 😂


Thanks for that link. There is more here than meets the eye. 666 potential.

Concerned Virginian

Wolf Moon
Thanks so much for another great opener!
To my unscientific mind, it appears that a form of “graphite lubricant” (that stuff one sprays on stuck door locks or recalcitrant bicycle chains) is an element of the formulation of the “vaccines”.
Apparently, the companies that produce the various “vaccines” have been working on tweaking their products for some time — and all behind the “safety wall” of the EUA, and all under the guise of “we must find a vaccine that works to fight the new variants.”.
Not only that — Pfizer and Moderna are putting these “new and improved vaccines” into their Phase III clinical studies (projected to end in 2022-2023) under which their CURRENT “vaccines” are being used NOW.
People don’t understand that every single one of them who gets ANY of the “vaccines” are nothing more than lab rats to Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Novavax.
Pull Quote: “So manufacturers are already making and testing formulations against the most worrying of the variants. The design of the new vaccines made by Moderna and Pfizer make this easier than it would have been in the past. The genetic material used as the basis of the vaccines is made in a lab and the sequence is easily tweaked.”
February 25, 2021
Related to proposed third dose of their “vaccine” (the “booster shot”)
Pull Quote: “The evaluation is part of the Phase 1/2/3 trial and will study a third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine...Discussions with regulatory authorities are ongoing regarding an additional registration-enabling study using an mRNA vaccine with a variant sequence;…”
Lyophilized Formulation Trial
Pull Quote: “Pfizer and BioNTech initiated a Phrase 3 study evaluating a lyophilized (freeze-dried) formulation of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine that is designed to be refrigerator stable.”
NOTE: This is likely the genesis of the 2-shot “vaccine” that’s literally being carried door-to-door by the tag-along MD’s in the “Doses to Doors” programs. And CMS, as noted yesterday, increased the payments to MD’s starting June 9, 2021, for administering the “vaccine” at people’s homes.

Here’s the Pifzer-BioNTech pro-forma statement from the linked article above that “justifies” whatever they’re doing under the EUA (and, by the way, Moderan and J&J have similar language to cover their products and current research into “new vaccines to fight the variants” also):
“The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine has not been approved or licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for use in individuals 12 years of age or older. The emergency use of this product is only authorized for the duration of the declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of the medical product under Section 564(b)(1) of the FD&C Act unless the declaration is terminated or authorization revoked sooner.”

Last edited 1 year ago by RDS

The EUA part…perhaps this is why all the Scariants. To keep the emergency going.


Wow, Wolf! Please keep us lesser science types informed of where this leads. I think we already know where it goes, but it would be great to know with certainty.


Same here. I have taken one for years, but not any more. My spouse has been hesitant to take one at all for a long time due to immune system/allergy issues. We have shifted all of it over the last few years to nutritional changes, supplements, essential oils and the like with good effects on our health. Until I see some evil doers fry for their crimes against humanity we will never trust anything they say or do.

Never seen evil so openly displayed in all my days on this planet.


Once you truly accept that the people “in charge” REALLY DO NOT CARE about your life, then you understand that they will kill you for money and power without blinking an eye. They feel that way about ALL of us. They don’t think of us a human or important at all. They are sociopaths.

After understanding that, it all just falls into place.


It’s worse than that. They do care about your life — they despise you for it. How dare we prosper without prostrating ourselves before their gods?


“How dare we prosper without prostrating ourselves before their gods?”


It’s easy for me, I have a “no prostrate” clause in my contract…





Exactly so, Aubergine.

To them, we are just “useless eaters”.
And most of their ‘charities’ are merely money-laundering devices to avoid paying taxes.




Sadly this is where I am. I have accepted the reality and adjusting accordingly.


Me, too. I have decided they will have a very hard time starving me.


“They don’t think of us a human or important at all. They are sociopaths.After understanding that, it all just falls into place.”

[video src="" /]


Yes they are. FREAKS.


“I’m starting to think that Scott is right – we can’t believe anything these F-ers are pushing on us.”


In my experience, if that becomes your default position, you’ll almost never go wrong.

Even if they accidentally say something true once every decade or so, you’re still going to be right 99.99% of the time if you disbelieve everything they say 👍😁

Brave and Free

I never took the flu shot and was sick once. Then they started pushing them at my workplace. After a few years I fell for the propaganda and took one (free of course. )
And then the pharmacist tells me “oh yeah we (workplace) make a lot of $$ from the “Free” flu shot”.
That’s when I realized we were being used………


Questions. How do we know graphene isn’t on the tips of the test swobs for covid19 or in many of the masks? Asking for a friend.


IMO, we have NEVER KNOWN. But, we T R U S T E D.

NOW, in my case, perhaps “we”, the trust is hopelessly shredded.

VERIFY, then consider trusting something. No more blanket trust.


“How do we know graphene isn’t on the tips of the test swobs for covid19 or in many of the masks?”


I was thinking about that too, remember the claims about nano-gel on the swabs, and why they had to penetrate all the way up the nose to the blood-brain barrier for a simple DNA sample?

When a saliva spit-test is sufficient?

And the claims that tiny particles from the swabs were designed to break off in the mucus membrane at the blood-brain barrier?

Concerned Virginian

AND, as if “right on cue” —

Down and Dirty Summary: The U.S. Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy, issued a “health advisory” on Thursday, July 15, 2021, stating that “health misinformation” was an “urgent threat” in the midst of the current hard push to get every single American over age 12 “vaccinated” against the CCP”Fauci-Mengele” virus.
The advisory called on technology giants, local and state governments, local and state health departments, and the media, to take immediate and wide-ranging measures to put down what Murthy called “health misinformation” about the “vaccines” for the virus.
The HHS directive (linked below) is a real piece of CCP-inspired thought-and-behavior control diktats.
In particular, Vivek wants ALL governments — federal / state / local / tribal / territorial; and ALL “private, nonprofit, and research partners” to rapidly come up with, and implement, every program possible to “explore…identify…and issue recommendations” about the issue. AND — to come up with “appropriate legal and regulatory measures that address health misinformation while protecting user privacy and freedom of expression.” (page 15 of the HHS directive)

(Me: This HHS directive goes past anything yet in terms of directly targeting the Dr. Zelenko’s, the Dr. Moscovitz’s, the entire AFLDS, and anyone else who is disseminating the truth behind the “vaccines”, the research that produced the CCP”Fauci-Mengele” virus and its “variants”, and offers alternative / prophylactic treatments that have been proven to work. Murthy is basically calling for the shutting down of ANY information that brings the light of truth onto the subject. VERY troubling is his call [page 15 of the HHS directive] for tech giants to come up with “new algorithms” that detect, then either literally destroy, or greatly limit, any such information. That “while protecting user privacy and freedom of expression” language is cr@p, and Murthy knows it.)


This fact-checker business is already not working quite as intended. On seeing a facebook post with seven different such warnings, to me it is now looks like something is catching flak while being over the target. Or even invoking a mean streak: someone has some sore toes, and the urge to put on the steel-toed protective boots and jump down with full body weight is perceptible.

It isn’t «Warning, dodgy info ahead» as the intention was, but rather «LOOK HERE! LOOK! –>>> HERE <<<– LOOK HERE, INTERESTING AND CONTROVERSIAL GOODIES!»

Which is probably not the intended effect… And it is like it can rate some number of anklebiters: if there is only one or two it might be something half-mainstream, if there are seven of them, this is probably unusually juicy. Almost like Michelin stars at restaurants or hotel ratings.

Yes I know and all that, but it is still kinda useful for sensing the mood here and there, there are some groups with non-mainstream discussions still, and the censors are held off somewhat by using kennings in different other languages.


I’ve been telling people for years that the adjuvants are what needs scrutiny in the vaccine world. It’s “old hat” at this point but how in hell is it a good idea to use a lot of the things that are used as adjuvants to “tweak” the immune response…mercury (potent neurotoxin that crosses blood brain barrier), formaldehyde, aluminum, & what the hell are fetal cells doing there etc. and how are these “scientists” being regulated? Oh that’s right! Give em indemnity from liability so that they’re protected from the injured & irate public.
When will these mini Mengeles “no longer be able to walk down the street”?
Not soon enough.


“And we’re finally getting to the point where people are being FORCED to take their phony solutions.”


But not me…

Don’t forget that… 👍😂

Concerned Virginian

Adjuvants of various types are routinely added to vaccines given to the elderly — for example, the “flu shot” that’s for people 65 years old and above.


I really believe that’s why cases of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s are exploding. My mother has taken the flu shot every year for at least 25 years and now has Parkinson’s. No one else in my extended family has ever had it.


I’ve seen a number of discussions about the possibiliy of graphene being used. A lot of that is all gee-whiz-5G-magnetism-remote-control stuff, which have a few obvious weaknesses to put it mildly. Hasn’t been worth the time.

This exposition here however makes a lot more sense, that the graphene is in there as an adjuvant, that is, some chemical or compound that causes inflammation so as to let the vaccine payload in easier. And with the previous info about how these mRNA have been packaged and the spike proteins engineered so as to be more durable and efficient, then noticing that graphene also helps toward this, that makes sense.

It also makes it even less likely that I’ll want to have this stuff poked into me.

Thanks for a useful post!


Yes «disproving fake scandals» is pretty much the reference implementation of the strawman fallacy, in action. Arguing against that noise* can be an enormous time sink.

* «Noise» as in «signal-to-noise ratio», in the radio-engineering sense, where noise is the unwanted part of what is received.


And hence the push for electric vehicles so the flux can fuck with the graphine?


that ship still in Cuba. In stealth mode




Back in the day, I worked in a liquor store. All those pretty bottles on the shelves…..

Each of which came in a box, with other bottles.

People see all the pretty bottles, but a substantial part of the workload in a liquor store is getting rid of the d***ed boxes.

Seems to me they’re all cheering because the mRNA is nicely boxed-up by the graphene to be moved to lymph nodes. And I’m wondering which poor worker cell is working to break down the stack of boxes.


a really pissed off one!
packaging is another supply chain failure point going critical


A really well run liquor store will reuse the boxes for carryout purposes and only breakdown the ones deemed unfit for customer use. Just sayin’ … 😉


Depends on your clientele. Few are fortunate enough to have customers that buy boxes worth at a time.


You’re not from Australia


Ummm……g’day, mate?

Cuppa Covfefe

Yep. You lot are always tricked by the “Buy five, get one free” scam 😆


Well we are hanging off the earth upside down from our feet


It used to be the relentless attack from crocs, snakes, spiders, frogs, plants, bugs, and marine life that wanted to kill you insulated you from the idiocies of governments….but it seems like the nation’s practiced comfort with the former has blinded it to the dangers of the latter. Time was, I’d be happy and proud to be an Aussie….tomorrow, we may both be refugees from overweening globalists.


Yep. You got that right


Best of luck stayin’ one step ahead. I’ll help when I can, ’cause we’re on the same side.

Sadie Slays

Tip: If you ever need boxes for moving or some other project, go to the nearest liquor and ask if they have any boxes to give away. It’s a great way to get large, sturdy boxes for free.


I was actually about to come around to this. When you’re shipping $50 bottles of bourbon around, at $600, you don’t cheap out on the box. The more expensive the wine/liquor, the better-constructed the box….and the harder to break down and flatten.

Tell ’em you can come by in a couple of days and take a bunch, and they’ll save good ones for you.


O.M.G. – Wolf!!

Which, of course, begs the next question: If they’ve dumped in a bunch of GO, what the hell else have they dumped in?

Askin’ for a friend … 😉


It might seem nit picky but just how many walls do they have left that they can drop on gays?


Found this on Gab.

David Icke has put out a video about graphene oxide in the masks and in the vaccines:


Thank you.
Yeah, I thought his take on it was kinda skewed.

I like your analysis much better!


Hi. Nice to see this getting some sunshine.

Company that sells graphene, Nanografi.
Nice pictures.

(Funny seeing quinine as being observed in GO structure, BTW.)
comment image

Search on word graphene at yields discussion about super conductor properties and how graphene might help DNA modification in some way.

PODCAST  6/3/2020 kind of like a platform kind of like Velcro to allow other things to attach. And that that seam is usually done with the assistance of non biological materials like graphene oxide, which is being used as nano materials to help extract clip notate certain portions of one’s DNA. 

PODCAST  5/3/2020 So graphene is kind of like a glue thing. It’s not a virus thing. It’s a DNA thing. So let’s say I want to rewrite your genetic code, I might put Think of it like asphalt on the road, just wipe it out, and then stick the stuff that I want on top. And it’ll just mash in because it’ll just melt right in,

Actual testing was by University in Spain.

Ricardo Delgado, founder and director of La Quinta Columna participated with his research partner, Dr. José Luis Sevillano, in the XXVIII Humanitarian Conference organized by the World Coalition for Health and Life (COMUSAV) and the United Nations Council for Life and Truth (CONUVIVE). (link to video on Rumble)

Extract from transcript (link to transcript):

So from there we started to look for what kind of materials or, better said, nanomaterials can cause those kinds of properties inside the body and we came up with some of the candidates. One of them initially was graphene. Graphene inside the body acquires magnetic properties and is a superconductor. It serves for energy storage and condensation and was a strong candidate. Without yet having any knowledge of what was inside the vial, we realized that the industry or rather the stock market of the graphene industry had high uptrend peaks just as the COVID-19 vaccination campaign was starting at the beginning of the year, late December and early January. But also, quite curious, during the flu vaccination campaign. 

When we have seen the possibilities that graphene has, or rather, that graphene oxide nanoparticles have inside the body when it comes to neuromodulation and when it comes to picking up neuronal electrophysiological effects for brain mapping, we have realized the possibility that graphene is being injected. Can graphene be injected? Yes. Graphene can be injected. And, in fact, some scientific papers have already raised the possibility that it could be used as a nanoadjuvant in vaccines. With that hypothesis of suspicion, we did what anyone could have done and what I also recommend that you can do if you have access to a vial. 

We had access to a sealed vial from Pfizer, and by means of a request for services to a university, specifically in my name, it was sent for an analysis of the vial, where we were looking for the material in question: graphene. After some time of investigation by Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, Doctor in Chemical Sciences, Bachelor in Biological Sciences and member of the University of Almeria, we obtained this preliminary report where we are told that there is indeed solid evidence of graphene oxide in the sample and that it is also the main component of what they wrongly called a vaccine

From here and with this solid evidence, which will be further complemented with other spectroscopy techniques that can be done. Those that have been used are transmission electron microscopy; EMF techniques, also, optical microscopy; and ultraviolet radiation spectroscopy, which coincide with the peak wavelength of graphene oxide. From here we began to study the toxicity or cytotoxicity that graphene oxide has on the body. 

Last edited 1 year ago by Gudthots

Hey, T3! It’s good to see you!
 😀  *waves*  👋  👋  😍 

…how graphene might help DNA modification in some way.

Wow, that’s interesting.

Deplorable Patriot

Looking through Tore’s Telegram feed, and there is a claim that caffeine breaks up graphene…in the midst of a coffee shortage.


[…] Should We Be Skeptical of Industry and Media Denials of Use of Graphene Family Nanomaterials in Vacc… […]

[…] SIDEBAR: For background on graphene oxide (sometimes called graphene hydroxide – it’s the same thing, really), go HERE. […]