Our mission, as God-fearing and God-loving patriots, is to defend this Constitutional Republic and to increase its greatness, in all good things and ways, by using our voices in free but courteous speech, by discussing the happenings of the world and coming to a profound understanding of those things, and by sharing and promulgating these Truths on both this platform and others.
Welcome! The door is open, come on inside.
This special Cozy Q Tree Tuesday open thread is VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA world.
Say what you want, comment on what other people said, comment on people’s comments. Keep it civil. Treehouse rules, but expect lots of QAnon.
Remember – your greatest gift to President Trump is FIVE WORDS:
I AM PRAYING FOR YOU.
See the January 1st daily thread for the rules of the road, which are few but important.
Wheatie’s Rules:
No food fights.
No running with scissors.
If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.
……………….
May the Good Lord watch over our host, Wolfmoon, who is away from our tree and fighting the good fight…wherever he may be.
Welcome! Come on inside and get comfy.
This special Cozy Q Tree Saturday open thread is VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA world.
Say what you want, comment on what other people said, comment on people’s comments. Keep it civil. Treehouse rules, but expect lots of QAnon.
Remember – your greatest gift to President Trump is FIVE WORDS:
I AM PRAYING FOR YOU.
See the January 1st daily thread for the rules of the road, which are few but important.
Wheatie’s Rules:
No food fights.
No running with scissors.
If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.
……………….
May the Good Lord watch over our host, Wolfmoon, who is away from our tree and fighting the good fight…wherever he may be.
This special Cozy Q Tree Wednesday open thread is VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA world.
Say what you want, comment on what other people said, comment on people’s comments. Keep it civil. Treehouse rules, but expect lots of QAnon.
Remember – your greatest gift to President Trump is FIVE WORDS:
I AM PRAYING FOR YOU.
See the January 1st daily thread for the rules of the road, which are few but important.
Wheatie’s Rules:
No food fights.
No running with scissors.
If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.
……………
Do you have any pet peeves? If so, what are they? Let us know what they are.
This is GOLDEN stuff. I knew that we would find this someday.
But it’s SLICKER than it appears on the surface. You’re about to see how.
This happened within a short time after the Tree of Life Synagogue shooting.
Do the MATH. Whoops. I mean PSYCHOLOGY.
Before I even begin, let me say that I’m PINNING THIS ON an unknown intelligence agency. You will see why. I am NOT pinning this on the university that seems to have served as a conduit for the bad guys. There may be players there, but I now realize that many – possibly ALL of the university people are CHUMPS in the scheme.
I know a little bit about that, actually.
Rob Monster started the investigation, but I really moved it along, and unearthed what appears to me to be a Russia-related intelligence link to recruitment of Gab proto-Nazis via a New York university psychology department (shades of Dr. Blasey-Ford). Further research will likely bear this out. Others with more talent than me are invited to pick up the trail. I have not hit the mother lode, but I definitely struck pay dirt.
Start HERE, where Rob spotted what looked like FAKE NAZIS.
Note that I have sworn repeatedly that I’ve encountered fake antisemites on Gab. Real antisemites have certain tells that the fakes don’t have, and vice versa. But the fakes work hard, and working together, gin up paltry bias into a small crowd, and thus a real foil for the leftists.
Remember what they did to Roy Moore. HOAXING is a leftist VIRTUE.
Well, the fake Nazis needed an identity, so I set out to find it. I can’t be sure of who they really are, but I think I’ve got a very good idea now. And it is NOT who I suspected at first – the CHUMPS.
https://gab.com/epik/posts/42595943
Repeating his words for clarity:
Call me crazy but I am a bit suspect of this brand new Gab account. Of note, the phone number listed on their signup form apparently belongs to a SUNY faculty member specializing in Psychology: https://www.geneseo.edu/~duffy/ Seems like yet another fake Liberal account to be used as a prop in some media hit job. Hope an admin can check their IPs.
Rob Monster, on Gab, December 3, 2018
Here is an image of Rob’s post:
Here is a closer look at the sketchy Nazi page:
Several posters at Gab spotted minor tells that this wasn’t “real” Nazis or “alt-right”, backing up Rob’s evidence on the phone number. Rob did not publish the name associated with the phone number, although you can see a last name in the URL of the place he found it.
I took up the phone number search myself, simply using the number (716)-245-5235 and various search engines. As for the URL that Rob found:
Note that shortly AFTER Rob made his post, BOTH Gab accounts connected to the post (master and shill) were DELETED, and so was the university web page that Rob found, linked to the phone number. It was very fast, which tells me it was very professional.
Here is a CACHED copy of the page from Google.
Further research by me showed that all information about Professor Duffy, an emeritus professor (VERY important – part of her ultimate exoneration), had been removed from the Department of Psychology website.
This, despite the presence of information about OTHER emeritus professors STILL THERE.
This, despite the fact that Prof. Duffy seems to have been one of the Department’s MOST illustrious professors (see below).
These small but crucial facts are important when dealing with COVER-UP. Leaving those LOGICAL but not EVIDENTIARY loose ends is typical.
But COVER-UP does not mean CRIME or GUILT in HALPER-WORLD.
Are you with me? Cover-up is an INDUCED BEHAVIOR IN CHUMPS.
That is how WATERGATE worked. That is how MUH RUSSIA was supposed to work.
It’s PSYCHOLOGY. And it even works on PSYCHOLOGISTS.
This is the psychology of university cover-up – something I actually know something about.
It is likely that the department is embarrassed by this little kerfuffle, because other investigators and journalists began looking into it and calling (to say nothing of trolls, angry Gabbers, and who knows – maybe even real neo-Nazis). Academics are VERY typical this way – they are petrified of scandal and conflict, and this behavior is indeed quite useful for goading them. Such predictability is very useful to INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES. And, by extension, to the political entities controlling those agencies.
Communists in particular – who require nearly perfect cover – are quite aware of this embarrassment, and use it to advantage. It is a way of making other people cover up FOR THEM – cutting off channels of investigation (ask Lisa Page and her co-conspirators about this – not that they will answer).
So, we could be dealing with an INTELLIGENCE AGENCY or COMMUNISTS working THROUGH the Geneseo State University Psychology Department using instructors, adjuncts, students, visitors, and other sketchy players as bit-player operatives, and PHONE SHENANIGANS to redirect comms. Also remember that intelligence agencies have access to phone data. Even calls to DEAD NUMBERS are theirs.
Are you with me? GOOD.
Dr. Blasey-Ford is an excellent example of an on-site player with IC connections and sketchy whereabouts, connected to a university psychology department. Doesn’t mean the whole place is a nest of reds. But a university provides a great FRONT. Many open-area phones.
I’m presuming that both Professors Duffy and Kirsh (see below) were innocent victims here – they are likely USEFUL PAWNS in an intelligence patsy recruitment game. They’re lefties, no doubt, but probably “fellow travelers”. Not hoaxers or psycho-pushers. Using sympathetic people as chumps is – if you think about it – very useful. They tend not to inform, if they discover that they were used, and they will assist in a cover-up for multiple reasons. They “Stockholm in”, so to speak, if they become too aware.
How do you think I know this stuff?
That’s a Q question. Kinda like rhetorical, only with more awakening.
Now – it is VERY important that we distinguish between JOURNALISM and DOXXING.
I’m doing JOURNALISM. Maybe badly, but I’m trying.
I am presuming that there may be an explanation here, such as an intelligence agency which has followed Prof. Duffy and used her to attach their operatives. You will see why shortly.
So WHO is this woman, Professor Duffy? She is quite accomplished as an expert in COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, and has authored a number of books, a large number of publications, and some definitive academic textbooks. She traveled in EXTREMELY liberal circles and worked with left-leaning groups and people her whole life. PERFECT COVER for left-wing operatives to stay close to her. BUT that does not make her a plotter – VERY unlikely. She is USEFUL.
Possibly useful for community organizing.
If Professor Duffy knew Richard Cloward, Frances Piven, or Bill Ayers during her active career, then I will take all this exoneration back. Otherwise, I believe she is only distantly related to the PEOPLE who are actually behind incitement and recruitment on Gab, and she may not even know them, or know that they are IC operatives. Why do I say this? Follow along.
I believe that (716) 245-5235 – which was her old (1997-ish) FAX number, was kept at the exchange and suffix level in the department and reassigned to a NEWER FAX NUMBER with a newly created area code which includes the university.
If this is starting to sound like telecom spycraft, all I can say is BINGO. Much of spycraft IS telecom.
All the department’s phone numbers that I saw are now in a NEW area code, (585), rather than (716). Area code (585) was created by a SPLIT of area code (716) in the year 2001. Speaking from university experience here, when a new exchange or area code is introduced, there is usually an attempt by phone companies and the national system to conserve phone numbers and ring-through on dialing of an old number to the maximum extent possible, so that old numbers continue to work, and minimal headaches ensue.
Are you with me on that? This is why a theoretically dead number that WORKS is cover.
And there are even MORE tricks, but let’s not get into those quite yet. I hope you realize why IC is always neck deep in university telecom. They are watching EVERYTHING.
If we follow the same exchange and suffix (245-5235) to the new area code, then we find that the number goes to a younger colleague of Prof. Duffy’s in the same department, who is not only an expert on media-induced violence, but even more importantly, has authored several publications and books WITH Professor Duffy.
So what I’m saying is that the old phone connection and number survived as the new one with a different area code.
This is listed as a fax number, but many faxes include phones and answering machines, or ring through to them (which is an excellent way of hiding a somewhat unlisted phone number behind a fax). A fax is plausibly deniable if investigated – very important. Faxes are also readily hacked, and can do interesting things with phone calls.
Again – perfect for SPYCRAFT. The phone calls were potentially being REROUTED. And, of course, this is perfect for cutting off the connections in case of discovery.
Think collapsing tunnel.
Again – I am not so concerned about this professor, the colleague of Professor Duffy, because ANYBODY could be using the fax number phone for this fake Nazi group study, including TAs, post-docs, instructors, etc. In fact, it is very likely to be somebody OTHER than the professor, so that if discovered, focus will divert to the wrong person.
Professor Kirsh seems like a PLAUSIBLE person to be doing this, and thus he provides extremely good cover. Again – very important.
In other words, Professor Kirsh is FAR more likely to be a red herrring, than a red. His honest objection will cut off inquiry. That is the way these folks work. IN THE SHADOWS, using good people as fronts.
Click. The phone goes dead. End of story.
NOW – it is VERY helpful to read the biographies of both Professor Duffy and Professor Kirsh, from one of their coauthored books. This explains WHY they became fronts. Read both biographies CAREFULLY and to the very end, particularly in the case of Professor Duffy. (LARGER TEXT BELOW)
About the Author
Karen Duffy is a Distinguished Service Professor–emerita, at the State University of New York College at Geneseo. She received her Ph.D. in social and personality psychology from Michigan State University. Dr. Duffy served as a family mediator for the New York Unified Court System. She has also served on the executive committee and as the chief instructor for the training institute for the New York State Employee Assistance Program (EAP), as well as on the board of directors for a shelter for domestic violence and on an educational committee for a family planning agency. She has consulted to a variety of work settings on stress management, EAPs, and other work issues. She is a member of the American Psychological Society. Dr. Duffy has written several other books, including Community Mediation: A Handbook for Practitioners and Researchers and Community Psychology. She also edits several hard-copy and web-based annual editions for another publisher, on topics including psychology of personality, social psychology, introductory psychology, and adjustment. She has held two Fulbright Fellowships to St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia. While in Russia, she worked with AIDS International, several children’s shelters, and other community agencies. More recently, she completed a hu-manitarian aid trip to Mongolia.
Steven J. Kirsh is a Professor of Psychology at The State University of New York at Geneseo. Dr. Kirsh’s primary areas of research focus on the influence of violent media on emo-tion recognition and social information processing. He has published Children, Adolescents, and Media Violence: A Critical Look at the Research (2006) and Media and Youth: A Developmental Perspective (2010) as well as numerous scientific articles and book chapters.
Amazon Editorial Reviews
Professor Duffy’s background of extensive contact and project implementation with “community organizers”, and FAR more importantly her travels to Russia and Mongolia, lead me to believe that she at one time served as an unwitting conduit for whoever is behind this, allowing that group to get a foothold in her department. I believe that this group is an intelligence agency.
There is NO WAY – absolutely NO WAY – that this woman has not been approached, attached to, manipulated, or used by at least ONE intelligence agency, and possibly more. We should not presume, however, which one it is, based on “Russia”.
Professor Kirsh’s background makes his work of extreme interest to intelligence agencies in terms of handling what I call “useful psychos”. Prof. Kirsh is very unlikely to have anything to do with anything bad – it is his RESEARCH that is useful, and his SUBJECTS even more so, when accessed surreptitiously (see Nikolas Cruz). Prof. Kirch would be very usefully spied upon. I have no doubt that intelligence agencies watch every bit of data coming into and out of his offices.
Are you seeing where I’m going?
Having a DEEP spying operation in a university department of ANY USEFUL KIND (from nuclear to psych) is very advantageous to any intelligence agency. At the same time, routing dirty operations through a place of “clean hands” – useful pawns (we can’t really call these people idiots!) is also advantageous.
I think we caught some clowns in action, and I suspect that a similar operation may have been in place for a certain man who attacked a synagogue.
In fact, I suspect that the PHONE RECORDS of the Tree of Life synagogue shooter may be extremely enlightening. Maybe even what looks like a WRONG NUMBER.
And yes – it really IS complicated. That’s why they get away with it.
People on our side need to think in terms of asymmetric warfare. Because the communists DO think that deeply.
Information warfare IS asymmetric warfare.
And that is why they keep using it to try to take down Trump and stop MAGA.
Just DO THE MATH PSYCHOLOGY.
W
“What can I say, folks? Complicated business!”
PS: There is a reason the leftists are STILL after Gab.
This special RISE OF THE FREE PATRIOTS SATURDAY open thread is VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA world.
Say what you want, comment on what other people said, comment on people’s comments. Keep it civil. Treehouse rules, but expect lots of QAnon.
Remember – your greatest gift to President Trump is FIVE WORDS:
I have wanted to get this article out, but I was stuck on “number 10”. Sure, I could come up with TEN. EASY. But I needed a good one for NUMBER 10. I mean, I needed a REALLY GOOD ONE.
And our blessed President, Donald J. Trump, VSG, just gave it to me today.
Stick around for it.
Once you see this stuff, you cannot unsee it. This is Q on steroids. You follow this, and it shows that everything Q has been telling us is the straight dope.
That “16-year plan to destroy America”? OMG – it was part of a much larger and longer plan. The exact length is not important. What is important is the 8 years of Bill and Hillary Clinton, leading up to 9/11. THAT is significant. They fit into Q’s 16-year plan like a prequel.
That part is actually important. Cloward-Piven depends on SURPRISE. This is why it’s not a form of legitimate government. It’s a form of subversion.
OK – now we REALLY begin.
1. Trump saved a ton of money and gutted lots of unworking CRAP by overhauling the Clinton sabotage
That right there is a sign that we are dealing with highly intentional Cloward-Piven waste.
Now, THIS part is what I call “classic” Cloward-Piven. This is just a special case, like special relativity is to general relativity. It’s all about economics, public services, overuse of them, getting people onto welfare rolls, etc. In this case, we’re talking about “things that waste money” more generally. We are talking about OBVIOUS MONEY STUFF. This is the Cloward-Piven stuff that we KNOW about. Money-related.
It turns out that Richard Cloward and Frances Piven reacted to the outing of their strategy, and to the various COUNTERMEASURES against it, by looking for NEW ways to make it work again. OPEN BORDERS is one of them.
Basically, when people put measures in place to LIMIT overuse of public services encouraged by Alinskyites like Cloward and Piven, THEY came up with the idea of OVERWHELMING with sheer numbers – hence OPEN BORDERS.
Starting to see why the Dem radicals are so adamant on refusing to give an inch on Trump’s Wall? He’s unmasking the Cloward-Piven radicals, folks.
Starting to see why Nancy Pelosi ran hidden progressive Danny O’Connor against WALL supporter Troy Balderson?
Hey – Trump Unmasking is FUN!
However, it gets worse. I believe that Cloward and Piven themselves helped the Clintons design a lot of very bad stuff into the 1994 Crime Bill. Some of it will come out in the next nine reasons. This other stuff is LIKE standard Cloward-Piven in its effects, but it goes WAY beyond it.
PS – if this “Wall” stuff is giving you a funny feeling about Bill and Hillary sounding “pro-borders” at any point in their miserable radical lives, then let me solve that little mystery right now. They LIED all the way through.
2. Joe “Handy-Man” Biden was the “author” of the Clinton crime bill
Yes – that would be CAUGHT plagiarist Joe Biden as the “author”.
Yes – this would be the SAME Joe Biden who was the “author” of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990.
That would be the same Joe Biden who lied to us about “get a shotgun” when the Commie Cabal tried to take our guns after the Sandy Hook “sketchy propaganda-augmented psychological event”.
Enjoy his lies MOCKED, after Red Diaper Sergey and the Wocommie Sisters YouTube Faction helped their fellow radicals spread Biden’s propaganda.
The fact is, Joe Biden has been an integral straight man for an enormous amount of cabal shenanigans. His constant, repeated involvement in these things is very sketchy.
There is also another reason Biden is a suspect – I will get to that later.
3. There had been a giant federal crime bill only 4 years earlier.
Yes – the same one that included Joe Biden’s Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990. That would have been under GHWB, by the way, so if you think he was innocent of the plans – well – not very likely.
Why did we need another crime bill? AH – there is the rub.
4. The Clintons used their own misguided Waco raid as justification for the crime bill, and particularly the “assault weapon ban”
The disastrous Waco raid was planned LONG BEFORE the Clintons arrived in Washington, and possibly even before they began officially campaigning.
Years ago, I was shocked to learn from some witness (the article is long gone – I have never been able to find it again) that Hillary had been intensely interested in the Branch Davidian group very early – while (in the opinion of the witness) there was no real reason for her to be interested. This came out in the scandal after the failed raid.
Well, it makes sense now, if we accept that she had a LONG TERM PLAN.
Hillary needed a communist propaganda event to justify the Clinton crime bill, which had many LARGER purposes, including gun confiscation. A CULT with GUNS makes a VERY handy target for a MASS PSYCHOLOGICAL EVENT.
The problem was, just like everything else that Hillary touched, disaster ensued, not always in the way that the radicals planned.
4. Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven THEMSELVES were very likely involved in the bill’s design, or had influence on it
This is the most astounding part, if it’s true. All I can tell you is this – Cloward and Piven THEMSELVES were involved in the DESIGN and SIGNINGS of AT LEAST two other bills – one of those in 1993 and the other one in 1996 – thereby bracketing the crime bill.
The first bill was Motor Voter – obviously designed to help Democrat electoral cheating. The second was Welfare Reform in 1996. Clearly they were making sure that Welfare Reform didn’t damage their Alinsky welfare ABUSE models TOO MUCH.
Can you IMAGINE including these radical theorists in the design of ANY bills? This is how people build back doors into systems – get some RINGERS on the inside. And Cloward and Piven were TOP SHELF ringers.
It is very important to realize that Cloward and Piven were IDOLS of the Clinton entourage, as well as Obama’s mentors. They had INFLUENCE in the Bill Clinton administration. And their MODEL works on SURPRISE – on being DISHONEST about ABUSING systems through Alinsky tactics.
But it gets worse.
5. Under generalized Cloward-Piven revolutionary objectives, throwing more black people into prison would be a FEATURE, not a BUG
This is the part that freaked me out when I realized it. This kind of sabotage cannot be done from OUTSIDE the system – one has to get INSIDE. Which is exactly what the Clintons did.
The Clintons used their 1994 crime bill to SET UP the justification for something that would become the Black Lives Matter movement. They used that bill to foment the basis for communist revolution with a strong racial component.
This was exactly Stalin’s plan, by the way. To exacerbate American race problems into a revolution or civil war.
Remember when Hillary was “confronted” by BLM activists after Bernie gave up his microphone so pathetically? Remember Hillary showing some kind of middling “resolve”, and gently debating them?
FAKE! It was absolutely scripted, just like everything else she does.
Just like I think her zinger about “Holder, not Booker, they all look the same” in a sarcastic tone mocking Republicans, was scripted. NO WAY. The moderator wasn’t a natural deceiver, and read the wrong name with clear deliberation and knowledge. I spotted that one. SCRIPTED. Just like all the little kids. Just like her debate questions. Just like everything else she does. Utterly scripted.
The kicker here is that there is no way the CLINTONS get blamed for this – except that Hillary went JUST A WEE BIT overboard with “superpredators“.
The problem with “superpredators” is that it left an easy way to connect HER to the Clinton crime bill and the INTENDED effect of mass incarceration of blacks.
So finally – WHY would the Clintons want this to happen? NOT merely to build up revolutionary grievance. They would also want it for – DRUMROLL – standard Cloward-Piven effects. Mass incarceration is EXPENSIVE – it will build up the system debts – overload it – break it – and bring about the communist revolution. She WANTED it.
6. Under generalized Cloward-Piven revolutionary objectives, 100,000 more police on the streets works WITH mass incarceration to help create the other side of BLM
Look at it. Right there. The other side of the future confrontation of BLM, and the Clintons set it up, while looking like they were solving the problem.
More police, more criminals, and make them each other’s enemy.
Look like you’re solving it, when you’re actually making it worse.
Now part of this is NARRATIVE CONTROL. The normal effect of incarceration and REAL NEWS is to make people change their behavior.
The radicals knew how to prevent those police from working – the gangsta rap movement and elements of hip-hop lifestyle that GLORIFIED sex, violence and basic criminality. The radicals used CULTURAL MARXISM to keep the 100,000 extra police from having any social effect. Which means MORE CLOWARD-PIVEN spending with NO EFFECT.
See how that works? Cultural Marxism is VERY effective.
7. Bill Cooper’s leak and what we know today MATCH, showing that the Clinton crime bill was part of their plan. Future proves past.
OK – this meme is a bit of a “Bill Cooper remix” joke, but not really.
This is a long story. Dig in if you have the time, and will enable you to see so much about what is going on.
There was a military leaker / whistle-blower named Bill Cooper who shook the “conspiracy theory” world during the Clinton administration. He ended up being killed shortly before 9/11, but don’t let that part get in the way. He casually mentioned a bunch of stuff about UFOs AND intentional military UFO disinformation projects, that sounded a lot like what we heard from others, but ignore that for now. He even talked about a kind of “depopulation agenda” (my words) that sounds a heck of a lot like the entire current UN policy and the Clintons’ actions – both Bill and Hillary – and the Clinton Foundation’s interests, but again – put that aside for the moment.
The thing that was most profound and relevant from Bill Cooper, for what we are talking about right now – the Clinton crime bill – was an almost exact description of what the Democrats did LATER with “assault weapons”.
Here is a larger version of the same section:
So you see here an outline of what has since become very obvious.
Bill Cooper actually explained something I could never explain – the fact that Bill Clinton and the Red Chinese seemed to be doing the OPPOSITE of what Bill Clinton was saying publicly on “assault weapons”.
In 1993 and 1994, Bill and Hillary Clinton were publicly saying that “assault weapons” were bad, bad, bad. But if you were part of the gun world then, you would have seen the OPPOSITE in reality.
CHINA – with the blessing of the Clintons, began DUMPING all their old SKS and AK-47 rifles INTO the United States, at dirt-cheap prices, as a way to begin financing their military modernization. This continued for the ENTIRE 8 years of Bill Clinton. Not only that – the Clinton DOJ used FBI informants to hand these things out like CANDY to everybody they could talk into one, using arguably bogus private sales – the EXACT THING which Democrats rail against now.
“WHY?” – in Hillary’s cackling voice – one might ask.
Well, Bill Cooper seems to have an answer. And his ANSWER was published BEFORE it happened.
If you’re interested in Bill Cooper, here is a long (2 hour) interview, back when CNN was still a very reasonable non-government network. Remember – he eavesdropped a lot of things, and he realized that he himself was fed disinformation to test for leaks. He was trying to figure it all out – not always successfully. So stay skeptical, but look for places where it looks solid, or CLOSE to the facts.
8. Democrat policies on crime and domestic security after 1994 always chose and continue to choose the expensive and freedom-encroaching over the effective.
Notice how even left-wing BBC was seeing that – in 2016 – the 1994 Clinton crime bill was STILL problematic.
But more importantly, note the PRICE TAG. THIRTY BILLION!
Note that the price tag of the Border Security bill that was passed under Obama was over 45 BILLION – 50% more than the 30 BILLION for the 1994 Clinton Crime Bill.
And yet you hardly even REMEMBER that bill under Obama – right? And yet, if anything, our illegal immigration problems are WORSE today than they were under Obama, despite re-spending 50% MORE. Right?
See how that works? The Obama border security package was NOT EFFECTIVE – or they could MAKE it ineffective (with things like DACA), and THAT is why they passed it.
MORE MONEY – NO EFFECT – YEAH, BABY – DEMS ARE GOOD TO GO!
Think about how the Democrats will ALWAYS vote for bloated packages which do nothing, but for a measly 5.7 billion for an actual wall – NO WAY.
Just think about it. One might say that they have stuck to the plan.
It’s called CLOWARD-PIVEN.
The whole point of Democrat policy since 1994 has been to FOLLOW THE PLAN started by the 1994 crime bill.
9. Democrat leadership was strangely quiet and absent on the First Step Act.
Whoops! No black people? Just wait until Trump gets out of this signing to a presser with THE PEOPLE.
The people you will NOT see associated with this thing are (1) the Democrat leadership, and (2) the TDS media.
Think about that. Trump, GOP, and renegade Dems – largely BLACK – supported criminal justice reform. NOT the “governmedia”. NOT the Democrat-media complex.
At first you might think the ABSENCE of Schumer and Pelosi would simply be out of embarrassment. But the fact is, President Trump NEVER blamed the need for an overhaul on the Democrats OR the Clintons. It would have been SO EASY to keep the Dems away from First Step, but Trump never did. Not once.
Oh, that Unmaking Trump is SO CLEVER.
It would have been VERY easy for the Democrat leadership to make political hay out of the First Step Act – to claim some of the glory for it. Trump would have let them.
But they didn’t. NOT one bit. And yet the BLACK FOLKS were all over it.
Listen to Trump call it “bipartisan”.
Think about that. Black folks want something, and the DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP doesn’t want to have any part of it.
And let’s dig deeper on THAT – because it takes us to the very heart of this thing.
Something very odd went on here. BLACK support for Trump overhauling the Clinton bill went 100% across the board from KANYE….
Thank you to Kanye West for your nice words. Criminal Justice Reform is now law – passed in a very bipartisan way!
Just got word that Matthew Charles will be coming home within 24 hours. Thank you @realDonaldTrump for signing the 1st step act. This is what true bipartisanship can accomplish. https://t.co/9EnwDSksfw
Notice that commie Jones took a lot of heat for his honesty about Trump.
THAT is significant.
The great IRONY here is that, in trying to turn the humiliation and discipline of “Menshevik” Van Jones for siding with Trump, into some kind of lesson for liberals to “stay on the Plantation at all times”, what WaPo actually did is document how the left preserves the efficacy of Cloward-Piven operations. This is where media discipline and solidarity are so critical to communist operations.
ONE IS A STRAY. TWO IS A SLAVE REVOLT. Know who to return to the fold (Van Jones), and who must be crushed (Kanye West), because the latter will escape again, or not return when offered safety, and THAT breeds rebellion.
It is only because Van Jones is still valuable to the left, and because it is too risky to drive him over to Kanye-land, AND because there are ENOUGH black voices ready to criticize him from the Plantation, that Van Jones was not completely demolished.
But the fact is, the MEDIA and the DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP just had one of their MAIN ARTILLERY BATTERIES knocked out by Trump – thanks to Kanye West and Kim Kardashian. With help from Van Jones.
The Democrats are NOT about helping black Americans. They are about using blacks. Until somebody BETTER to use comes along.
10. They just don’t care about crime.
President Trump has finally hammered home the most important point of my Top Ten – and he did it today.
THEY DON’T ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT CRIME.
Just listen to it. He hammers it home.
Trump is talking about the BORDER, but if what he says is true – and I absolutely believe it – then it means that these Democrats never cared about crime when they created the 1994 Clinton crime bill.
They cared about REVOLUTION.
So go back in time. WHY did they have this crime bill that Trump had to FIX after decades of trouble caused by it?
BECAUSE IT WAS SUPPOSED TO CAUSE THE TROUBLE.
Who were the TOP people associated with the 1994 Clinton crime bill?
Biden, Schumer, and THE CLINTONS.
Epilogue
I love the way the old FBI show of the 1960’s had an “Epilogue” at the end, where they talked about the results of the crime and the investigation.
Adding Authors for Articles (Posts) and Dear MAGA Threads to Keep the Site Going While I Am Away
The bottom line is simple. I must vanish from this site for a period which includes the “Super Blood Wolf Moon” eclipse of January 20/21. It would be ill-advised for me to go into details about this absence. The timing is short but indeterminate – it could be a week – it could be longer. I am thinking that 1-2 weeks is reasonable.
Therefore, I need to get this site running without my daily attention as soon as possible, but definitely before a date I have chosen:
January 17, 2019
This will begin a three-day window during which I will disappear. January 17, 18, 19 (three of my “spiritually lucky” numbers, by the way). I will definitely be gone before the SBWM days of January 20 and 21, with January 20 also being the anniversary of President Trump’s Inauguration.
My return will be – if all goes as expected – 1-2 weeks later. I am thinking January 31 is a good target date. Expect me back by then. If not, then it’s time to get worried.
SO – before that time, I need to do two things:
Add 1-3 “Authors”, in addition to Flep, to provide articles (what WordPress calls “posts”) on an occasional basis, as desired. I am planning on Lady Penguin being one of them, unless she objects. If I can get a couple more volunteers, that would be great. (Daughn has already volunteered.)
Add 1-3 Authors who will do the very important Dear MAGA daily thread on a nightly basis. Again, I need volunteers. The best people for the Dear MAGA threads are the most reliable – those who try to show up for the beginning of the daily threads every night.
SO – do I have some volunteers?
Note that during this time, I will retain the administrative capabilities but not use them, so that no new members will be added, and anything going into moderation will simply stay there. Authors can add articles, edit them, or take them down as needed.
If we get horrible or illegal troll comments from currently allowed posters (unlikely), you all can dogpile them or notify the FBI, who are watching anyway, so no biggie. Worst case scenario, the author can simply take down the article, which takes down the comments, and when I get back, it’s a huge scandal and we make the leftists pay BIG TIME.
In other words, there won’t be any problems. 😉
So – last call. Any volunteers? Please speak up. I would like to begin this process as soon as possible, so that I feel comfortable disappearing by January Q.
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 38db44 No.4627556 Jan 6 2019 12:32:35 (EST) [RBG] Why was she ‘selected’? Who appointed her? Remember [her] history. Ref: 230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Highlights: >Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101) >Called for the sex-integration of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts because they “perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.” (Page 145) >Insisted on sex-integrating “college fraternity and sorority chapters” and replacing them with “college social societies.” (Page 169) >Cast constitutional doubt on the legality of “Mother’s Day and Father’s Day as separate holidays.” (Page 146) >Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102) >Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195) >Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97) >Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98) >Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” (Page 218) >An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16) >Wanted he, she, him, her, his, and hers to be dropped down the memory hole. They must be replaced by he/she, her/him, and hers/his, and federal statutes must use the bad grammar of “plural constructions to avoid third person singular pronouns.” (Page 52-53) >Condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. McRae and claimed that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a constitutional right. http://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senators-overlooked-radical-record-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/ Who are the doctors ‘currently’ treating [RBG]? What other political [former/current] sr. political heads are they affiliated w/? What ‘off-market’ drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function? What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]? Who is managing her care? Who is ‘really’ managing her care? The clock is ticking. PANIC IN DC. Q
Q Post 2653
People are starting to realize just how much sabotage was done.
[Intro] Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? Caught in a landslide, no escape from reality Open your eyes, look up to the skies and see I’m just a poor boy, I need no sympathy Because I’m easy come, easy go, little high, little low Any way the wind blows doesn’t really matter to me, to me
[Outro] Nothing really matters, anyone can see Nothing really matters Nothing really matters to me Any way the wind blows
Queen, Bohemian Rhapsody
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: e73272 No.4628579 Jan 6 2019 13:34:40 (EST) How many AUTH FISA UMBRELLA SURV warrants targeting those who illegally targeted [ ] are currently active? Upstream collection can be very revealing. When you no longer control the levers of POWER, do FVEY (‘Allies’) buckle & cooperate in order to preserve and maintain their future? Germany losing stranglehold on EU? The future will not repeat the past. The clock is ticking. Q
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 1bfec6 No.4630322 Jan 6 2019 15:09:09 (EST) When will the public discover that Ted Cruz was also illegally SURV (pre_POTUS_R nomination)? C_A ‘illegal’ SURV > members of Congress? C_A ‘illegal’ SURV > members of the Press? C_A ‘illegal’ SURV > SENATE INTEL COMM? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/10/cia-senate-investigation-constitutional-crisis-daniel-jones https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/01/world/senate-intelligence-commitee-cia-interrogation-report.html Who ordered the SURV? What justification was provided to AUTH SURV of ELECTED OFFICIALS? SURV fall under scope of FISA warrant or internal to Dept or outsourced to FVEY? Reality check – friend or foe, we all spy on each other? Should we be spying on ourselves? Should we be tasking others to spy on ourselves in order to avoid U.S. law? Was FVEY established & designed by the INTEL COMM as a backchannel SURV apparatus to avoid domestic laws triggers and Congressional/Senate oversight? What keylogs exist to monitor FVEY intel collection? What ability do former GOV officials have re: ability to access C_LEVEL FVEY offshore data? How did HRC gain access to highest CLAS SAPs (closed system access) and able to transfer to remote/home server? (Q above should scare every single American) How did CHINA locate primary C_A assets within CHINA [187]? Money buys POWER. No punishment [Brennan] by HUSSEIN ADMIN re: SURV of Senate etc? Logical thinking, why? https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/national-security/article24770296.html Justice Dept declines to pursue? Fake News media limits exposure to public? When did @Snowden breach NSA & PUBLICLY RELEASE (CRIPPLE) INTEL GATHERING ABILITY (NSA)? NSA targeted? Where did @Snowden work prior to NSA contractor ACCEPT? What SENIOR LEVEL GOV/C_A OFFICIAL rec @Snowden for NSA contractor OFF/TAR position? Post public release of CLAS NSA PRO > U1? Where is @Snowden today? What country was involved in U1? If real target country was VENEZUELA or ECUADOR – why didn’t @Snowden take a direct flight from Hong Kong to those locations? How many direct flights run daily from HK to V&E? If @Snowden was C_A/NSA would he not understand (simple logic) going public PRIOR TO END DESTINATION SAFETY would ‘LIMIT’ ACTIVE PASSPORT TRAVEL ABILITY due to block_DEREG? WHY WOULDN’T @Snowden PUBLICLY RELEASE INFO AFTER HE ALREADY WAS SAFELY AT FINAL DESTINATION? Why then would @Snowden route through RUSSIA? Was RUSSIA final destination? Was RUSSIA true destination? Could @Snowden be seen releasing CLAS programs/intel FROM INSIDE OF RUSSIA? What role did BRENNAN PLAY in the @Snowden leaks re: NSA? What was BRENNAN’s background re: SAUDI ARABIA? Does the C_A hold blackmail on political leaders? Does the C_A protect those who protect them? Why are ex C_A contractors running for office? How many ex C_A contractors are currently in office? Hello, [AS]. Once an agent, always an agent. Q
Q Post 2657
And then there was MOAR….
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 54fc2d No.4633937 Jan 6 2019 18:57:01 (EST) Remember when D’s and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] pushed mass fear that POTUS would start WWIII re: North Korea? POTUS > PEACE on the Korean P > NO further missile tests or U enrichment. New narrative created. Refusal to provide coverage of successes. Remember when D’s and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] pushed a stock market collapse if POTUS was elected? POTUS E + policies > largest gains recorded in market’s history New narrative created. Refusal to provide coverage of successes. [Use FED to inc rates to counter growth and project POTUS blame] Remember when D’s and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] pushed complete economic collapse if POTUS was elected? POTUS E + policies > lowest unemployment records in history + record jobs/GDP growth New narrative created. Refusal to provide coverage of successes. [Deploy and use ‘racism’ ‘sexism’ and every other ….’ism’ to counter potential Black/Hispanic pop support] Why do D’s and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] continually push the ‘IMPEACH’ narrative if impeachment requires 2/3rd SENATE VOTE TO ENACT (odds of that?)? Do they push this FAKE NARRATIVE to project a supposed ‘supportable w/ evidence’ wrongdoing to their BASE (confirmation bias)? Accusations never supported by facts? Group-Think. The list goes on and on….. PANIC IN DC? WHY? WHAT WAS LOST? POWER OF THE PURSE. COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY. POWER TO REPLACE SENIOR OFFICIALS WITHIN CRUCIAL GOV POSITIONS (DEPT’S) WHO CAN THEN REPLACE SR+MID+LOW POSITIONS (TRICKLE_DOWN REPLACEMENT). POWER TO APPOINT SC JUSTICES. (What if HRC won and appointed 2+ crooked SCJs?) (The Last Resort) POWER TO DIRECTLY UNDO HUSSEIN/PREV EO‘S WHICH HARMED-GREATLY LIMITED THE US IN MANY VITAL/NEC WAYS. POWER TO REBUILD THE UNITED STATES MILITARY (BACK) TO A GLOBAL SUPER POWER. (CHINA PAYOFFS (BRIBE $) FAILURE) POWER TO ENACT LAWS BY EO TO COMBAT AND PROTECT OUR PEOPLE. POWER TO SHIFT FOREIGN POLICY THEREBY REDUCING OUR ENEMIES ABILITY TO PROSPER AND SOMEDAY REIGN. (IRAN DEAL – PARIS ACCORD – CHINA TRADE – SYRIA – ………………….) POWER TO DECLAS CRUCIAL DOCS TO PROVIDE THE PUBLIC W/ THE TRUTH (TRANSPARENCY). POWER TO GIVE BACK POWER TO THE PEOPLE (AS INTENDED BY OUR FOUNDERS). LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD. ………………… Q
People in White House sound as confused as everyone else about what happens after the president's EO, which McGahn was against him signing. There's inter-agency disagreement about what it means. Trump now essentially tunes his chief of staff out, Trump driving the train.
