“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
Those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it.
Some people just have to learn the hard way.
Yes, those are platitudes that many of us like to spout when history DOES actually repeat itself, and when young anarchists are persuaded or paid to give communal and what we call communistic living a shot. Really. We do this. It is happening in multiple corners of the internet, including Professor Jonathan Turley comparing what is happening right now to the French Revolution when the mobs in Paris defaced quite a bit of property and destroyed anything that reeked of privilege. Personally, this writer believes a more apt comparison can be made to other ugly times in history, but the point is the same: the people were sent to the brink.
https://youtu.be/BP-pqhXvI7Y
With the current generation of young anarchists claiming what amounts to colonies within American cities, trying out communal living for the upteenth time in trying to improve on the Paris Commune of 1871, the words of the first governor of Plymouth Plantation – the original American commune that failed – resonate.
(Forget the tall tale that is told about the Pilgrims and the first Thanksgiving which is taught in schools and has become legend. The real truth is a lot less romantic.)
The real story is much more interesting than the simplified version we learned as school children and offers valuable insight into solutions to our economic problems.
Over half of the 101 Pilgrims who first landed on Cape Cod were dead within the first few months of their arrival, victims of disease, harsh weather conditions and malnutrition. Over the next three years, 100 more settlers joined Plymouth Plantation, but the colony was barely able to feed itself. According to William Bradford, the first governor of the colony, the Pilgrims were so destitute that “many sold away their clothes and bed coverings [to the Indians]; others (so base were they) became servants to the Indians and would cut them wood and fetch them water for a capful of corn; others fell to plain stealing, both night and day, from the Indians … .”
Why was this happening? New England may not have the most temperate climate or the most fertile soil, but the Native Americans had managed to grow food and feed themselves. What prevented the Pilgrims from doing likewise?
The answer, it turns out, was an incorrect political economic decision imposed on the colony by the investors in the Mayflower. Before you blame capitalism (a term which had not yet been coined) and bankers, however, understand that the cause of the Pilgrims’ problems was the decidedly anti-capitalist property distribution scheme these investors imposed. They assumed that common property ownership would be the most profitable arrangement under which the Pilgrims could work and produce in order to pay back the money fronted them for their voyage. These investors turned Plymouth Plantation into a collectivized farm.
The results were disastrous. Where there is not ownership there is no pride and little incentive. Governor Bradford explained it this way: “For the young men, that were most able and fit for labour and service, did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children without any recompense.” Those who did more of the work also felt it unjust that they should receive no greater reward than those who did little, Bradford said, and husbands resented that their wives were forced to cook and care for men to whom they were not married.
The problem was solved when each household was given a private plot of land to tend. “This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious,” Bradford reported, “so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble and gave far better content.”
Bradford blamed the failed collectivization experiment on “that conceit of Plato,” referencing the Greek philosopher’s advocacy of collective ownership of land, and said those who believed communal property would make people “happy and flourishing” mistakenly thought themselves “wiser than God.”
Those who blame the “greedy investors” for this debacle miss the point. The Pilgrims were not in conflict with those who had enabled them to flee to the New World but with each other. Some saw an opportunity to slack off while others supported them, and those willing to work became decidedly less willing when they saw no more benefit to themselves than to their lazy fellow colonists.
As is always the case when an economic system fails, it was a failure of human nature rather than the system. But since human nature itself is eternal and does not seem to change no matter how hard utopians try to force it to, it makes sense that a system which accepts human nature and works with it to produce the best results will succeed.
Seriously, communal living and work distribution only works in the Biblical sense, when dedication to God is involved.
[42] And they were persevering in the doctrine of the apostles, and in the communication of the breaking of bread, and in prayers. [43] And fear came upon every soul: many wonders also and signs were done by the apostles in Jerusalem, and there was great fear in all. [44] And all they that believed, were together, and had all things common. [45] Their possessions and goods they sold, and divided them to all, according as every one had need.
[46] And continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, they took their meat with gladness and simplicity of heart; [47] Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord increased daily together such as should be saved.
And even then, personality conflicts prevent true peace and tranquility in communal living.
It can be done, solving the conflicts, but it takes change on the part of at least one person to make it happen.
And to get the transformation to take place, the person changing must be at the brink, the precipice, when they think nothing else will solve the problem, a lot like an addict admitting they have hit bottom.
An illness. A marriage or any other relationship falling apart. Financial ruin. A special needs family member. A profession that dies. All of these situations force change that either encourages growth or results in disaster.
In the current national situation where we find ourselves: Freedoms in peril; A nation in danger of dissolving; Decades of work destroyed….
That’s what it is taking to get the people to wake up, and walk away from the dark side.
What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. (I’m full of these platitudes today.) What we are witnessing is the American people being taken to the brink. We, the red-pilled and the people who understand that the CHAZ colony in Seattle, among others, is a futile exercise, see the entire situation as a demonstration of weakness among Democrat leaders – which it is – but those who are still supportive of Democrats don’t. They still reside in an echo chamber that has nothing more to say than Orange Man Bad, and mail in voting. That echo chamber is in the process of being destroyed.
4464
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 4b50f0 No.9600507 📁 Jun 13 2020 15:15:27 (EST) NEW The ‘how’ will be hard to understand for most. Focus on the ‘why’. The ‘when’ is now. Q
Why is this happening? To save the nation, and the world, from enslavement and murder by a group of people who think they were created more equal than others. No, it is not going to be pretty. It is going to be rough, and there are times it will seem that all hope is lost.
In the end, though, God wins.
In the meantime, we’re in for a wild ride. Buckle up.
NOTE: This is an old, unfinished article from LAST SUMMER, which dug into some troubling aspects of the origins of ANTIFA in America, and particularly the roots in academia. It is FAR from complete, and I have no desire to finish it, but I decided to publish what is there, RIGHT NOW, as ANTIFA is being declared a terrorist organization, because I believe researchers looking into ANTIFA will benefit.
ANTIFA is being HELPED by academics, and those incubator institutions and “bad shepherd” academics need to answer for what they created. THIS will help us return freedom of thought to universities, IMO, because the radical student footsoldiers of uniform leftist thought and mind control will lose their backing by Marxist and crypto-Marxist professors and administrators.
Some editorial comments are added in bold.
“This morning’s attack…was a horrific act of violence that has shaken us all.”
Whether one considers my neologism of “STANTIFA” to come from ANTIFA-encouraging, “Stef”-Halper-producing, “Two-Door”-Ford-backing STANFORD UNIVERSITY, or the notorious and frankly dubious ANTIFA-defending professor STANISLAV VYSOTSKY – who may have actually GIVEN BIRTH to Portland ANTIFA – it is all about what falls out of the following video.
EDIT: A video which was apparently REMOVED by ANTIFA-backing YouTube Menshevik Susan Wojcicki and her clan of crypto-radical enablers of the radical left.
Gabriel Nadales: I’m a former Antifa member and enough is enough — Antifa must be stopped
https://youtu.be/ojoOlwmKTGc
If you don’t have time for the video, consider this summary from the video’s page on YouTube.
EDIT: Fortunately, I kept this transcript:
The video showing Quillette reporter Andy Ngo being savagely attacked by Antifa at a demonstration in Portland, Oregon, last weekend has rocked the nation. The footage of masked thugs beating him with blunt objects and throwing “milkshakes” allegedly filled with quick-drying cement is shocking to many. But I’m not surprised by this horrific behavior—I was once behind the mask.
PORTLAND POLICE SEEK OTHERS TAKING PART IN VIOLENT ANTIFA ASSAULTS, AS MORE DETAILS OF ATTACKS REVEALED
I first became involved in Antifa in 2010 while I was in high school, and over the course of two years I participated in several demonstrations throughout Southern California. Although I never hurt anyone, I yelled obscenities, I destroyed property and I am ashamed of my actions. While I walked away from the movement over seven years ago, I have been following its growth and today’s Antifa members are far more brutal, thuggish and bold than anything I experienced. How did it get to this?
Antifa has been encouraged and allowed to thrive on our college and university campuses. Police are often forced to work with their hands behind their backs, as we saw from the footage of Ngo’s attack, and administrators have failed to hold those who commit acts of violence and intimidation accountable. We are now seeing it spill over into our communities. Antifa will only grow more aggressive if it is not stopped, and we must target it where is has found fertile ground—our college and university campuses. The seeds of this violence have been planted and are encouraged by leftist professors in the classroom.
Over the last few years, there has been a growing trend of extremist professors advocating for violence and intimidation to force leftist ideology onto society. Examples can be found from coast-to-coast:
— Mark Bray, a visiting scholar at Dartmouth College, is a staunch defendant of Antifa’s use of violence and even wrote “Anti-Fa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,” in which he claims that ‘violence is a “legitimate response” to groups with incendiary views.’
— Then there is Assistant Professor Stanislav Vysotsky at University of Wisconsin – Whitewater who writes in an op-ed that: “On America’s Streets, Antifa’s Militant Anti-fascism Isn’t Terrorism – It’s Self-defense.”
— Professors at Purdue and Stanford Universities, have worked to create a “Campus Antifascist Network” (CAN) to bring together “anyone committed to fighting fascism.”
— Unsurprisingly, students are following the guidance of their teachers. Just a few weeks ago, Campus Reform reported that the Autonomous Student Network at the University of Texas Austin threatened to doxx incoming first-year students if they join Young Conservatives of Texas or Turning Point USA chapters.
Make no mistake, Antifa’s violence is being fueled by professors in the classroom who incite their students to enact political violence against others. That is not preparing the next generation of leaders, it’s preparing the next generation of thugs. Universities ca……
Gabriel Nadales, alleged former ANTIFA member
There is more in the video, and I encourage you to watch and read it (the text appears as captions IN the video).
The above video finally prompted me to make this post, rather than just make comments to the effect of what you are about to read, as I have been doing.
I have been sitting on some explosive research which – in my opinion – backs up what this person is saying – that university “professors” are the ones who are actually behind ANTIFA. In fact, I believe there is circumstantial evidence that Portland ANTIFA was actually ginned up by the very same communists who are pushing the propaganda meme of:
“Trump supporter” equals
“white & nationalist” equals
“white nationalist” equals
“white supremacist
It’s a rather cunning meme, and to see this meme being PUSHED into the American law enforcement community by an ALLEGED CRIMINOLOGIST is – quite frankly – shocking.
Speaking of law enforcement, there is ANOTHER THING which pushed me to make this post – today’s news about an ANTIFA fire-bomber “martyring” himself at an ICE facility, and now being LAUDED by ANTIFA THUGS.
[EDIT: Tweet gone but residue stuck in WordPress – saving as an image in case the above remainder is lost.]
There is a lot of breaking news about Willem van Spronsen, and before I get on with this, I call on ALL HONEST RESEARCHERS to begin looking for connections of him to any of the following:
Russian expats and descendants in Washington State
Known communists or “red diaper” families
European ANTIFA and other global anarchists
Portland ANTIFA
Stanislav Vysotsky or his various contacts in ANTIFA or academia
Professors, grad students, and other potential Seattle-area “ANTIFA creators” starting in 2006 – particularly in 2007-2010 – until the present time
“Friends” who encouraged van Spronsen’s martyrdom complex, possibly by regular phone calls of consistent length
You will understand WHY I am suggesting these things, by the END of this post.
The fact that ANTIFA is now clearly being ginned up to “defend open borders” – the same open borders that are being rushed by RUSSIA-CHINA-CUBA-VENEZUELA-backed migrants – tells me that this is INTERNATIONAL – that ANTIFA in America has OVERSEAS ORIGINS.
Mandy and I have discussed the appearance of ANTIFA in America, and I expounded on two theories of it – (1) that the German, Stalinist, KPD-connected ANTIFA of the 1930’s never really went away, and (2) that it died out after World War II, and was ginned up anew in the United States. In that discussion, I postulated that European anarchists may have provided some form of continuity and encouragement to the early movement in America. Indeed, one frequently sees pictures of VIOLENT EUROPEAN ANTIFA being posted either mistakenly, or as a kind of disinformation, in discussions of American ANTIFA.
If that sub-theory of European ANTIFA providing a bridge is correct, then violent ANTIFA activist Willem van Spronsen seems like a potential fit.
AND – if Willem van Spronsen was a LINK between Soviet / Communist backers of ANTIFA and its origins in the United States – as in maybe Willem van Spronsen was a WITNESS or POTENTIAL WITNESS – well, sure would be convenient for those backers if he DIED. Right? And maybe was a martyr for the cause at the same time?
You starting to see this?
So let’s begin. The discussion will take two parts. The first part centers on ANTIFA violence in general, and Willem van Spronsen in particular. The second part concerns Portland ANTIFA, its origins, and its close relationship with Stanislav Vysotsky.
Because this article – excellent journalism, I might add – received IMMEDIATE push-back from ANTIFA and allied socialist forces, when it appeared, I am frankly surprised it’s still around. Since it will very likely be pulled down soon by leftists, once I expose it, I have made sure to locate an archived copy:
While this article provides an EXCELLENT window into ANTIFA and its enemies in late 2009, the real importance, is that it demonstrates how closely current ANTIFA defender Stanislav Vysotsky was working with the group when it was still quite young:
Rose City Antifa was founded in 2007, when anti-racists organized to shut down a meeting of the neo-Nazi Hammerskin Nation set for the Sherwood Elks Lodge (see “Skin Cancer,” WW, Oct. 3, 2007). The group posts cards and fliers at the Red Black Cafe, the Black Rose Collective Bookstore and other places where anarchists and the far-left gather, but its total membership is unknown.
On Saturday, Sept. 19, the group set up a recruitment table at a punk concert in North Portland benefiting the volunteer group Portland Books to Prisoners. Stanislav Vysotsky, a Willamette University sociology professor who studies anti-racist groups, was at the table laying out anti-fascist literature next to a sign that said “Rose City Antifa.”
Vysotsky denied he’s a member of the group. But he defended its tactics in an interview with WW.
Vysotsky says publicly outing one’s enemies—including publishing their home addresses and pressuring their employers to fire them—is a widely accepted practice by progressive social movements. (It’s also used by the right wing, which publishes addresses of abortion doctors on far-right websites.)
“The strategy is to shut them down.” Vysotsky says. “Someone can’t be active if they are out looking for a job, and homes are their base of operation. If you put yourself in the shoes of a movement member, there is very much a logic to this.”
My impression, reading this article, is that it was simply good, balanced, old-school journalism, digging for small facts and larger issues on both sides of the natural controversy of the story.
And – clearly – that was going to get it in trouble.
The Willamette Weekly article, published on September 22, 2009, received a published response, two days later, on September 24.
I simply let these articles stand for themselves. It is obvious that the reporter of the first article, at the time of the reporting AND the writing, was at least motivated to ASK if Stanislav Vysotsky was in fact a member of Rose City ANTIFA, taking note of (and clearly refusing to spike) the fact that Vysotsky was seeming to help the group hand out flyers.
Let the facts speak for themselves.
Sadly, I can only get a limited amount of information about Vysotsky and his academic writings. I don’t have the massive academic resources of a professor (it’s all very “pay to play”), nor do I have the commercial information resources of a journalist. I pretty much have the same thing as you all – an increasingly censored internet, controlled by the leftists who control SEARCH.
However, I am going to share whatever solid information I CAN get, in hopes that others with more resources take up the case. There is enough here to see that:
“Portland, we have a problem.“
For starters, Vysotsky’s curriculum vitae is – quite frankly – damning, in terms of his time in Portland. Timeline his arrival and academic history, and you will see the rise of ANTIFA in Portland correlating very strongly with those things.
Because there is some risk that it will be taken down, I have preserved the evidence as images:
There is also a true wealth of academic references. Because I refuse to buy into the bizarre alternative universe of “ANTIFA-think” propaganda as academia, which gerrymanders reality into an assortment of racial and historical grievances (which just happen to advance Soviet communism in America, but please don’t notice THAT), you won’t even see me arguing with “Vysotsky-think”, other than to state the following:
it is ALARMING that Stalinist thinking is being uploaded into CRIMINOLOGY
I suspect Vysotsky’s writings may ORIGINATE this thinking in academia
the primary effect looks like NORMALIZATION of “ANTIFA-think” in ACADEMIA
the secondary effect looks like NORMALIZATION of “ANTIFA-think” in NEWS
The latter point comes from the fact that Vysotsky gets interviewed by the news media, and the result is a bizarre framing of radical leftist talking points as “news”. Or, if not news, opinion.
I really don’t have to say anything here. There are people who buy into this stuff, and to me it’s just as contorted and nonsensical as the ginned-up opposite of the national socialists.
Socialists – national socialists – anarchists – international socialists – democratic socialists – WHATEVER. I let them speak for themselves. and I really don’t need to do much more.
READ THE ARTICLE. NORMALIZATION OF RADICALIZATION.
So THERE YOU HAVE IT.
Now – this is not all the information we have. There is MUCH more on Stanislav Vysotsky’s background that is, quite frankly, very damning, but we lack the resources to get a SECOND SOURCE VALIDATION which would pin things down. Thus, we encourage journalists with MORE RESOURCES to publish what THEY have, and we may then chose to VALIDATE if our information agrees.
(WAIT BEFORE READING THIS – we’ll do it together later in the post.)
… on February 17 tells me who is living rent-free in her mind. February the Qth was no accident. And yet – at this point – her little deniable taunt has almost no effect. Rather, it smacks of desperation.
We “know”. We simply know. No amount of calling us “Know Nothings” will save the coup. It’s that simple.
Ah, yes – that would appear to work both ways, for as Thomas Wictor once pointed out, Donald J. Trump may in fact be the most revolutionary President this country has had since EITHER Washington or Lincoln – take your pick.
And they’re TRIGGERED.
The anti-Trump embedded Soviet Democrat apparatus – of which Jenn Rubin is now a painfully, even humorously obvious member, is at this point in an all out war with something they can’t even admit exists, because THEY were the ones who backed themselves into a corner of “know-nothingism” about the QAnon psy-op.
And when I say “psy-op”, I’m really minimizing, because it’s becoming quite clear that the QAnon “anti-coup” is much, much bigger than just the simple world-wide deniable psy-op that it presented on its earlier surface. In fact, “the Q we knew and they loved to denigrate” was like just a single coronavirus spike on the total package, but one with UNDENIABLE, LOGICAL, and FORENSICALLY IRREFUTABLE modified features that pointed with great certainty toward its ORIGIN and TRUTH.
Yes Jenn – you lose TWO TIMES on THAT exact point. ENJOY THE SHOW.
Q is so big, when you understand its true extent and magnitude, that it becomes quite easy to see why it simply scares the HELL out of these people.
The irony is particularly rich here, and of course absolutely exemplary of the fact that the LEFT – of which Jenn Rubin is a “card-carrying” member – is all about accusing others of what THEY either DO or ARE.
NO – the leftists, both the open ones on the left and hidden ones on the fake right, are ON THE ROPES NOW – quite authentically – after having been ROPE-A-DOPED by the one guy who totally got Muhammad Ali at a Sun Tzu level – his authentic friend, Donald J. Trump.
As the electorate is gradually and continuously – as in “nothing can stop what’s coming” – wising up to how the Washington sell-out elite has sandbagged us for well over a century – more so since the advent of FAKE NEWS – the old reliable WEAPONS of the left are simply falling apart.
It’s rather glorious.
Of these weapons, DUPES are among the greatest prizes that Trump has liberated from crypto-Bolshevik worldview captivity. Speaking from my own experience, there is NOTHING – and NOBODY – like a wised-up DUPE to take down communists.
The greatest example, IMO – the great Whittaker Chambers.
Whittaker Chambers offered a rare “view from the inside” of the core communist conspiracy here in America. If you are not familar with his case, you can look, for instance, here.
The fact that I’m bringing Whittaker Chambers up at the same time as Tom Cotton and other former #NeverTrump, or maybe even Jenn Rubin and Alger Hiss, is not due to the inherent similarity of their VERY dissimilar cases, but rather because I want to make an incredibly important point.
DUPING – DECEPTION OF UNDERLINGS, TARGETS, THE OPPOSITION, AND EVEN BYSTANDERS is a CONSTANT across all levels and reaches of communist conspiracy. The duping of Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss by their masters differed only from the duping of Jennifer Rubin and Tom Cotton in the type, nature, and specifics of the lies used to get them to behave as desired.
Even within the hierarchy of committed communists, an extraordinary amount of deception occurs in EVERY interaction. It is a nearly, if not exactly, Luciferian economy of lies – not unlike the “carbon economy” that the “climate commies” almost imposed upon us through THEIR army of dupes. One cannot even begin to unravel communist conspiracy without, at every turn, considering whether a player is KNOWING, UNKNOWING, DECEIVED, or ALL OF THE ABOVE. Indeed, Senator Joe McCarthy’s greatest mistake was – in my opinion – failure to sympathize with the dupe – or – more specifically – to sympathize with the dupe in every player.
If you can’t see yourself as a communist pawn, as McCarthy eventually became, you cannot see what they’re doing. It’s a battle with THE LIE itself, and everybody loses a little in the process.
When you understand that the most diehard opponents of communism can easily become its most reliable and predictable marionettes, ready to jump through the right hoops in the left’s next false puppet show (Sea Island conservatives, anyone?), THEN you understand what we are truly up against.
So have a little sympathy for Jenn Rubin – she’s gonna need it. She – like all the rest of us – has been a dupe of the left.
NOW – it’s time to talk about another player in the larger drama – both a DUPE and a DUPER – namely Bill Kristol.
This piece has the NeverTrumpers in a snit—they hate when real journalism exposes what total frauds they are and the left wing interests that fund NeverTrump’s scam. So please share far and wide to further agitate Rick Wilson… https://t.co/GkHwQIbTY7
Look right there, folks. Both the deceiver and the deceived are on display. A DUPE of the left, just passing on the DUPAGE in new ways.
But where does this come from?
The very TOP of Bolshevism – a long time ago – would be my answer.
Deception is a way of life for these people, and it’s not pretty. Bolsheviks – the deepest of the politically deceived, embrace it with every part of their body.
So where does Bill Kristol, the ringmaster of NeverTrump, fit into Bolshevik deception? In my opinion, somewhere down at the hoodwinked Menshevik, CIA tool, familial Trotskyist, “conflicted conservative in a progressive Reform temple” level (the latter being the LITERAL description of similar NeverTrump “conservative” Michael Bloomberg).
I have a LONG, OLD Twitter thread on Bill Kristol and his “pink diaper” background, something critically necessary to understand his essential nature. Sorry if this FIRST enigmatic tweet of the thread does not make immediate sense. Twitter suspended the amazing researcher who I am referencing here. Which brings up a very important point. Twitter bans researchers only in part to remove them. Much more importantly, Twitter does this to hide THOUGHTS, EVIDENCE and KEY REASONING.
This Twitter thread, taking a long and fascinating route, explains WHY we saw the bizarre event of Bill Kristol’s NeverTrump BullWanker Boys defending Kamala Harris and Russian red diaper hoaxer Jussie Smollett from a bad joke that ended up backfiring when taken literally by MAGA Twitter.
I can sum up where the thread leads very simply. Self-deceiving dupes like Mensheviks are CRITICAL to “sell the goods” down the line, and thus FAKE CONSERVATIVES like Kristol, Rubin, and assorted Merry Mensheviks are created, promoted, and amplified to feed the Soviet Fake News with America’s version of Pravda and Izvestia. Whether it’s to promote sabotaged memes like free but unfair trade, used to support world socialism, or to protect core players like Heels-Up Harris and Cryin’ Jussie, fake conservatives have profound uses to the radical left – they are NECESSARY.
Check it out if you’re interested – otherwise, let’s “move on”.
It’s time to RETURN to Jenn Rubin’s paywalled Washington Post opinion piece.
First of all, there is NO WAY that I’m going to ask you to subscribe to that Soviet Fake News monstrosity, the Washington Post, just to see one bogus opinion piece by Jenn Rubin. Ridiculous! And yet – well – you would do well to read it, just to see how the screaming has gone up by an order of magnitude. SO – if you DO have a subscription to this horrible rag, then here is that link again:
When Ivy League-educated, formerly sane politicians spew conspiracy theories, debunked talking points and contempt for science, the question often arises: Do they believe this nonsense (i.e. have they become thickheaded by listening to Rush Limbaugh and watching all that Fox News?), or are they cynical purveyors of claptrap designed to woo unsophisticated voters? (Disclosure: I am an MSNBC contributor.)
That query came to mind when Harvard Law school graduate Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) descended into sheer quackery and decided to perpetrate conspiracies about the origin of the coronavirus. The Post reports:
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) repeated a fringe theory suggesting that the ongoing spread of a coronavirus is connected to research in the disease-ravaged epicenter of Wuhan, China. Cotton referenced a laboratory in the city, the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, in an interview on Fox News’s “Sunday Morning Futures.” He said the lab was near a market some scientists initially thought was a starting point for the virus’s spread.
This is unadulterated nonsense, one step removed from anti-vaxxer rubbish and UFO-spotting. (“In response to Cotton’s remarks, as well as in previous interviews with The Washington Post, numerous experts dismissed the possibility the coronavirus may be man-made.”)
Jenn Rubin, Washington Post, February 17, 2019
Nasty! And it gets worse.
Notice how “The Post” is layering opinion onto their own biased reporting, but keeping them separate, to keep the accusations of – well – WHAT THEY ARE CLEARLY DOING – in check.
Jenn Rubin is resorting to Alinsky ridicule here. Of course the Alinsky press – her employers – are not going to call her to task for being proven WRONG during the following week, as China indeed began to back off strongly on the origins of the virus, as scientific evidence is now CLEARLY showing human manipulation of the protein sequences – changes which simply could not occur though normal evolution. TAMPERING is clear. I don’t particularly care what China’s NEXT excuse is, just like I don’t particularly care what Jenn Rubin’s next attack on our side is.
Listening to Fake News FIRST is almost always the FIRST MISTAKE at this point.
Well, look at that. The Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda rag finally admits what I’ve said for a month: coronavirus didn’t start in Wuhan food market. So where did it originate? Time for answers from CCP. https://t.co/UTvcjvrHNz
Yes, look at that. Just FIVE DAYS LATER and Jenn Rubin goes under China’s bus of continually restated LIES. Nobody had to wait 28 days.
Jennifer Rubin, not only LIKE Communist China, but ALONG WITH Communist China, has simply lost credibility.
You want the news on the coronavirus?
READ OUR THREADS and follow along as we SLOWLY and PAINFULLY figured it all out, gathering honest thoughts on it from all over the web, and coming to the same conclusions gathering NOW, that the science actually started to show at the beginning.
IT WAS A CHINESE BIOWEAPON, “SOMEHOW” ESCAPED, AND NOW BEING DECEPTIVELY INFORMATION-CONTROLLED BY CHINA, THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, AND AMERICA’S FAKE NEWS COMPLEX. INCLUDING JENN RUBIN, PERSONALLY.
Yes, let’s put it very plainly. She’s enabling the Chinese Communist lies.
Yeah, one might have to use their brain to sort through all that discussion and discern the emerging and evolving consensus, but hey – that’s our WHEAT-CHAFF SORTER. Jenn can’t do it, because she’s a PERSON OF THE LIE. AWAY, CHAFF.
Yeah. It’s complicated. “Know-nothingism.” Sounds a bit like “old scientific skepticism”. I LIKE IT.
Just because you don’t UNDERSTAND IT, Jenn, doesn’t mean it’s not REAL. You may have to do some adapting to the new world.
Now if you want to see WHY Tom Cotton has earned the IRE of the “bio-blood-hoaxing socialist set”, with their Soviet/Maoist biowarfare schemes disguised as “whoops”, just check this out:
This is politically correct pablum, @DrTedros. The greatest enemy is of course the virus, not hurt feelings or fear or stigma. All this kind of idiocy does is make people question the WHO’s priorities. https://t.co/ser1Qqqxf7
Archived as an image, because socialist Twitter is likely to suspend Tom Cotton and delete his content at some point.
Daughn’s reply to this is SPOT ON. In a sane world, WaPo and Jenn Rubin would have to answer for their tiresome and pathetic ass-covering on behalf of China, WHO, and the damned virus itself. Daughn would have a column in a truthful WaPo, and Jenn Rubin would be LEARNING how to make those blueberry muffins from Daughn. And not very well, I suspect.
Now, it may be that Jenn Rubin doesn’t have a TASTE for what China and the rest of world communism are resorting to right now, and is having some difficulty facing the truth of a NEW HOLOCAUST of her own side’s making, but, as Whittaker Chambers could have told Alger Hiss when he decided to come clean….
“That’s too damn bad. It’s time for the TRUTH to be told.”
Kinda funny. Q said these folks wouldn’t be able to walk the streets. Between their own crimes and their own damn virus, it sounds about right. But we’ll wait for a court to tell us the truth. We’re patient, and we believe in rule of law.
Maybe Jenn Rubin will have her own Whittaker Chambers moment.
But she does seem kinda nervous now, doesn’t she?
And now, we get onto the final part of this response. A teaching moment about American Bolshevism, so that people can actually get a flavor for the degree to which American Bolsheviks can and will sell this country out.
It is much easier to convince you of Jenn Rubin’s mild, almost funny sell-out, when you see REAL sell-out like this guy. To go along with “Uranium Girl” Hillary Clinton, we once had “Polonium Boy”.
Let’s talk about GEORGE ABRAMOVICH KOVAL.
When you read about THIS:
You usually think about THESE people.
Sometimes, you think a bit more modern, too.
The person you DON’T think about is George Koval, because you never heard of him.
Koval is MUCH more embarrassing than the Rosenbergs, because he exposes a lot of history you’re not supposed to know about. That history includes a deep schism in Judaism between Zionists and Socialists – one which is either EXACERBATED or SMOOTHED OVER as a kind of historical transistor, creating a massive “handle” on Jews for manipulation by Bolshevism. Moreover, if you follow the Koval story, you will see how LONG AGO the Bolsheviks learned to weaponize fluid borders, human migrations, persecution as cover for spy insertion, and all kinds of nastiness which is NEVER, EVER covered in American leftist public schools or academia.
When the Soviet Democrats finally took complete control of media, education, and even history itself, you stopped hearing about the Rosenbergs, but you NEVER EVEN heard about George Koval.
Koval was a far less “glorious” traitor than the left-romanticized Rosenbergs.
I mean – I have a strong INTEREST in nuclear history, and I didn’t know about this guy until just recently. But this guy was GOOD. Very good. Bad for America, but VERY GOOD for Soviet Russia.
Here is Wikipedia’s quick synopsis of Koval’s significance.
George Abramovich Koval (Russian: Жорж (Георгий) Абра́мович Кова́ль, IPA: [ˈʐorʐ (ɡʲɪˈorɡʲɪj) ɐˈbraməvʲɪtɕ kɐˈvalʲ] (listen), Zhorzh Abramovich Koval, December 25, 1913 – January 31, 2006) was an American who acted as a Soviet intelligence officer for the Soviet atomic bomb project. According to Russian sources, Koval’s infiltration of the Manhattan Project as a GRU (Soviet military intelligence) agent “drastically reduced the amount of time it took for Russia to develop nuclear weapons.”[1][2][3][4][5]
Koval was born to Russian Jewish immigrants in Sioux City, Iowa. As an adult, he traveled with his parents to the Soviet Union to settle in the Jewish Autonomous Region near the Chinese border. Koval was recruited by the Soviet GRU (military intelligence), trained, and assigned the code name DELMAR. He returned to the United States in 1940 and was drafted into the U.S. Army in early 1943. Koval worked at atomic research laboratories and, according to the Russian government, relayed back to the Soviet Union information about the production processes and volumes of the polonium, plutonium, and uranium used in American atomic weaponry, and descriptions of the weapon production sites. In 1948, Koval left on a European vacation but never returned to the United States. In 2007 Russian President Vladimir Putin posthumously awarded Koval the Hero of the Russian Federation decoration for “his courage and heroism while carrying out special missions”.[6]
I urge you to read the ENTIRE Wikipedia article, because it will open your eyes to a reality which American communists – AMERICAN BOLSHEVIKS – have gone to ELABORATE PAINS to hide from us.
You have undoubtedly heard about a nation called Israel. Well, that one wasn’t the problem. It’s Stalinist competitor, in the Soviet Union, on the border with China, where George Koval was INCUBATED and then SENT BACK TO AMERICA – that was the problem.
Oh, the face-palm of Stalin’s attempt to compete with Israel by creating a socialist alternative does NOT end with the rainbow flag. His first pass at “excuseniks” in the late 1930’s – which was again used to send all kinds of deep red diaper into the US and Israel in the 1970’s and 1980’s – was simply to go into the region and crack down on reactionary religious Jewish practice, so that he could provide persecutory cover for all the deeply atheistic and communist spies to “flee”, which he then sent out into America AND British Palestine.
“Excuseniks” was one of the most brilliant and diabolical ideas the Bolsheviks ever came up with.
George Koval didn’t just magically decide to betray America. A LONG, SLOW process of exposure to AMERICAN COMMUNISTS prepared both Koval and his family for his eventual betrayal of this nation.
NOW – here is the big take-home point that is not going to be easy to digest.
This shit did not end in the 1940s.
It CHANGED, but it did not end.
People are going to have to get used to the idea that when McCarthy was “removed from relevance” by the FAKE NEWS of the early 1950s – manipulated into an idiotic collision with the military and then media-marginalized into a dismissal narrative – that was only the beginning.
Bolshevism then began a slow and steady march that was UTTERLY unlike the straw man of “red scare” communism which the Bolshevik elements in media used to falsely ridicule their opponents.
History is not what you thought it was. FAKE HISTORY – the result of decades of FAKE NEWS and FAKE ENTERTAINMENT – was used to take choice, freedom, and knowledge away from you.
Slowly, carefully, but surely.
Start with George Koval and Jenn Rubin. Study them. Then and Now. Compare and Contrast. Note the differences. Note the similarities. Note the purposes.
Just take some time, because you will need it simply to realize how LONG Fake News has been herding this nation toward the Old Russia Ranch, and now the Same Old China Slaughterhouse.
One was a spy. One is a modern propagandist. Both of them, however, pretended to be things that they clearly were NOT, in the interest of advancing socialism.
Trust me – FAKE CONSERVATIVES are going to be one of the very first classes who are not going to be able to walk the streets. And if you want a historical model for how this works, look at Nazi collaborators in post-World War II France. They kinda kept a low profile to avoid getting their heads shaved, in vengeful concentration camp style.
I will be straight-up here – I don’t even wish a good head-shaving on the American Soviet collaborators. Not even jeers on the street, although – well, it couldn’t happen to nicer communists. However, I do hope that the SPOTLIGHT OF TRUTH shines rather strongly on WHAT THEY DID, and maybe there are some – COUGH – retirements.
Remember. And not just THIS.
They tried to pull a COMMUNIST COUP on us.
Using reverse-blame LIES.
And they KNEW they were LIES.
TIME TO WAKE TF UP.
If these coup inciters, enablers, and PLOTTERS can’t actually walk the streets, maybe that’s not such a bad thing.
The most amazing ideological child abuse recollection of our time!
H/T Duchess, for inspiring the werewolf meme used as this post’s theme
ADMISSION
Eventually, it had to come out.
I – notorious anticommunist Wolf Moon – was a communist SHILL as a youth.
Of course, I didn’t realize at the time that I was shilling for communism, and perhaps other things, both good and bad, but that doesn’t matter. I was doing it all the same. OH – and my parents were so proud of me!
I wasn’t just ANY child shill for Lenin’s birthday Earth Day – I was really, really good at it.
I was SO GOOD, that I was picked to “lecture adults”.
SO – when I look at David Hogg or Greta Thunberg, the thought which goes through my head – along with a sigh – is “Yeah. Been there. Done that.”
Maybe not as big. Maybe not as famous. And maybe – just maybe – thank GOD for that.
It is my hope, that my recollections – viewed BACK IN TIME from adulthood – will give people INSIGHT into the cynical abuse of children AND teachers as political pawns.
Because – yes – I believe that TEACHERS are also abused by what has been done to the student-teacher relationship. The POLITICIZATION of that relationship is WRONG.
On the path to my youthful recollections and admissions, we will wander past DAVID HOGG and GRETA THUNBERG, as I view their SIDESHOW ACTS from the perspective of an adult with his own regrets about both HOW and WHY he was so similarly used.
We will stroll past what is likely to become the most controversial and shocking theory of the climate change hoax EVER. Which I offer with NO REGRETS, because it fits like O.J.’s glove without the TRICK rubber glove underneath. My SCARS form an ARROW pointing straight back to the source.
FUTURE PROVES PAST.
Yes, there is NOTHING like an educated MARK. And while we’re at it, somebody wake up their SHILL POPE. Who knows? Maybe he can be SAVED, TOO.
His Jesus tweets are great. But when he shills for heavenly satanic deceptions, he errs in ways that can only be FIXED by exposure, opposition, rebellion if needed, slow deliberation, and greatest transparency before all of humanity – NOT “emergency” measures at the behest of MONEY and HIDDEN POWERS.
Finally, we will see how cultural Marxism and the degradation of the student-teacher relationship, which can even include elements of pedophilia – are part of this abuse of kids and teachers.
BUCKLE UP.
REALIZATION
It was the Parkland psychological operation which woke me up from the blissful state of having rather intentionally forgotten my “useful idiot” junior high school past. I don’t remember exactly how long after the communist-orchestrated shooting of *17* children…..
…. it was, that David Hogg appeared, but it was at the moment when Hogg disrespectfully attacked the NRA that I was psychologically shocked into REMEMBERING all things connected to CHILDREN lecturing ADULTS.
I remembered that movie about the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia – The Killing Fields – and the horrifying moments therein, as children were used as informants, enforcers, and executioners against adults.
I remembered personally-told tales from Hitler’s Germany – how children were used as spies of the National Socialist state against everybody – even their own families.
And THEN – right then – is when I remembered MYSELF lecturing adults. I remembered their faces. I remember their STARING BACK AT ME. And I remember SOME of those faces showing a kind of OUTRAGE – an outrage which I myself now felt, in horrible realization that the TABLES OF IDEOLOGICAL IMPOSITION HAD TURNED, but it was the SAME WICKED HAND doing the turning.
THERE, but for the grace of God, went I.
NOW, by the grace of God, I understood.
It’s actually interesting that this same state of “outraged adult being lectured by a kid” happened to me ANOTHER TIME, after the Chinese communists obtained leverage over my old tech employer, and their “spy-boy” lectured our assembled workers, in utterly Orwellian fashion, telling us how taking our jobs to China was a “victory” for us.
The primary witness to which happens to be DEAD now.
And of course, let us remember who BACKED THE KHMER ROUGE during their genocide.
But that’s another story.
SO – anyway – that point of recognition is when I got on Twitter and related, in concrete but abbreviated terms, about my having been a “child advocate” for Earth Day.
This is a great post that shows kids used by leftist teachers for propaganda. I was used for "Earth Day" and "save the planet" propaganda in the late 60's. Words put in my mouth, love-bombing – it all seems so phony and cringeworthy now. FAKE!
Great points – thank you. I was used as an child "ecology shill" back in the 60's – we actually have Earth Day (Lenin's bday, but ignore that) because us kids lobbied for it for our teachers. Same thing, different issue. They USED us, just like they're using these kids.
Y'all I'm having flashbacks to 5th grade in florida… our class did something for one of the local news channels about Earth Day, or something environmental. It was the rage back then I guess.
If you think this political gun-grab by leftist teachers and student shills is a new thing, it's not. The progs did this before, and Grandpa and Grandma remember. It is how they began the regulatory, bureaucratic monster known as THE SWAMP.
This was one of my most effective moments on Twitter, despite everything @jackboot could do to shut me up. I observed a CHANGE in the audience. The simple admission that what we were hearing from the mouths of our children was propaganda shattered the ice in the room of adults who were being lectured by kids, and afraid to talk back.
I was talking back loudest and most confidently, because I had been one of them. I had been one of them, and I had lived to the point of KNOWING and ADMITTING that I had been USED in psychological propaganda.
I want to talk about my days as an Earth Day shill, but first, I want to explain how effective we were in talking back to the child shills in Parkland, by NOT talking back to them. Instead, we ATTACKED THE HOAX ITSELF. It helps to understand how the left can take TREMENDOUS LOSSES if we stand up to their CHILD-ABUSE bullshit – even if we do so by STRIKING ELSEWHERE.
FUTURE PROVES PAST.
PARKLAND
The Parkland psychological operation largely BACKFIRED, beginning with the fact that the “conspiracy theory” of a STAND-DOWN was pushed forward until PROVEN TRUE. This was key. Once we showed that the shooting was very likely some kind of “allowed event”, there were GROUNDS to believe that it truly was some form of STAGED PROPAGANDA.
Once THAT happened, communist dominoes fell everywhere. Check my old Twitter for the WAR CORRESPONDENCE.
Eric Holder’s devious “Promise Programs” – which I likened to “propaganda farms” – were closed. Multiple forms of FBI political malfeasance and likely intentional negligence were exposed. The communist Runcie brothers were outed, along with the Ivy League KGB-CIA crypto-communist on-campus recruitment programs which had created them. This was a HUGE BREAK – the recognition of KGB-wing CIA malfeasance on American campuses – particularly our best ones, like Stanford and Harvard. While communist SHILLS protested eye-rolling, fake CIA “recruitment sessions” as STAGED OPS, deep recruitment of the best and the brightest to RULE OVER US was taking place every day on those same campuses, and had been for DECADES.
Most of all, for me, a “black swan” of sorts came out of Parkland. It was an understanding of an old scandal ALMOST NOBODY KNEW ABOUT, but which affected EVERYBODY.
And trust me – the white hats “have it all”.
Through what was probably a misinterpreted Q post, I looked closer at the idea that the subsequent fatal FIU bridge collapse was some kind of payback and leverage on Florida Republicans, for having dared to mess with the wrong people in Parkland.
It was a brilliantly RIGHT IDEA, but I got it from what was most likely a WRONG IDEA about a Q post.
When the FIU bridge collapse happened on the IDES OF MARCH, 2018 – undoubtedly (IMO) some kind of orchestrated sabotage accident to pressure and intimidate Florida Republicans who were pushing too hard on Parkland – particularly the stand-down – I remembered Q’s mysterious post from February 24, number 827.
“The BRIDGE” most likely refers to OBAMA, but I didn’t know that at the time. The whole post is very cryptic, and likely had a very different meaning than where my mind went. But my mind went exactly where it needed to go. SO BEAUTIFUL. The “error as discovery” idea on full display.
Stanislav Lunev is an extremely important Soviet defector who told us about plans for sabotage INSIDE THE UNITED STATES. Just add “The BRIDGE”, which I took as the FIU bridge collapse, and the fact that information about a STAND-DOWN started coming out in the press on February 24, 2018, and you can see that – even though it’s weirdly clairvoyant (or more rightly pseudo-clarivoyant) – that interpretation fits like a glove.
I was thinking – well – maybe the Q team was throwing CHATTER and CODE back at the PLOTTERS. Maybe the good guys know from CHATTER that a BRIDGE is going to be the payback target, but they don’t know WHERE or WHEN. So maybe they were playing MIND GAMES with the [communist?] enemy to make them stop. At least – that was my reasoning at the time.
But that’s not important. Even if that was WRONG, the idea of LEVERAGE was one that I needed. It was RIGHT.
Funny how that works. RANDOMNESS. It’s beautiful.
You see, that idea of a university accident as leverage popped into my mind as a NEAR PARALLEL of a memory, where historically important but apparently unrelated legal leverage “just happened coincidentally” as the apparent BYPRODUCT of a university accident.
It was a “coincidence” which made somebody’s huge problem “just go away”.
Well, what if it didn’t “just happen”?
What if “preservation of a future windfall of trillions of tax dollars” wasn’t just a silly byproduct of that university accident, but the actual driving PURPOSE?
And then it ALL SOLVED. One of the most beautiful scams ever pulled, almost 40 years ago. TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS and THE OBAMA PRESIDENCY rested on that scam. And I had no idea. None. I was at the EYE of that HURRICANE and never realized it.
I thought it was all about me. Oh, I was the PERFECT CHUMP for that scam.
People were USED like plastic toy soldiers, melted with a torch, to make sure history happened a certain way. Funny. And sad. But THAT is who we are dealing with.
And I would be remiss not to mention that this hurricane was related, in a strange way, to 9/11.
But we don’t have to talk about that now. I do hope, however, that you get the point.
There were LOSSES for the other side, on Parkland. HUGE losses. Simply because we REFUSED to knuckle under to the pleadings of CHILD INFORMATION COMBATANTS.
So where are we now? Ah, yes. One more diversion.
Greta Thunberg.
SAINT GRETA OF CARBON DIOXIDE
It was a conversation with Duchesshere that got me realizing that climate hoax child-shill Greta Thunberg is an even closer analog to what I was, than David Hogg.
Greta Thunberg is an ingenious invention – and she IS an invention, as can be found in THIS amazing investigation of her “creation”:
Leave aside this young girl’s high-finance origination in the schemes of Euro-money weenies…..
Climate Nazis. Egads, I cannot STAND them.
Doesn’t this whole thing just SMELL like some “gotta sign the contract TODAY” scam? OMG – these people are stupid. They just give away the HOAX with everything they do. But THAT is exactly what love of money will do.
Sorry. Where was I? Oh, yes. His little “find” – Greta. His “Climate Youth”.
By any political propaganda technology measure, the idea of Greta Thunberg is INGENIOUS.
Greta Thunberg is the autism/climate equivalent of the Downism/LGBT “unassailable” invention Drag Syndrome.
This is a new and extremely toxic form of cultural Marxism, which did not stand a chance when I was a child shill, but it works like crazy now.
People would have rebelled at this shit in HORROR back in my childhood. Now, a “woke” but non-communist left-wing Republican art ninny (yeah, I know) who realized that an appearance by Drag Syndrome was about to wreck his little world in controversy, had to produce tortured psychobabble logic about protecting the most helpless of the “differently abled” to NOT ALLOW SAID FREAKSHOW to happen under his watch and destroy his brand.
When I was a child shill in the late 1960’s, the GIMMICK was that I was SMART. That was still a SIDESHOW TACTIC, but it could not be called out because TELEVISION and HOLLYWOOD – what I now call “Fake Entertainment” – was already littering our culture with sideshow acts faking forward as “top billing”. In our post-Gong Show world, we now think of this as normal, but that is, in fact, the power of the media to DEFINE NORMALCY – to create what I now call – you guessed it – “Fake Normal”.
Allow me to JAR YOU out of your complacency about how this worked.
And I didn’t even have to show you what you expected – The Stones – fronted by a WHITE GUY with BLACK VOICE and WOMAN LIPS – singing ROCK AND ROLL in GOSPEL VERSE.
Sideshow acts. Just like me – “the whiz kid”.
Yeah. You probably see it now. Greta Thunberg fits right into this “man bites dog” world used to soft-sell communism to Americans.
What they are doing now is actually using MENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN or similar CHILD MINDS as advocates.
The NORMAL are now HOSTAGES to the ABNORMAL who must be allowed to ACT OUT as long as that acting out is POLITICALLY CORRECT.
Good GOD. SHILLDREN of the FUCKING CORN.
Part of the SCAM here is misdirection. We argue about the CHILD SHILL PATINA instead of the CORE PROBLEM of the fraudulent hoax. A hoax which these children invariably BELIEVE, but do not actually understand with anything approaching even beginner wisdom.
And WHAT a hoax it was, in St. Greta’s case. With the collapse of Michael Mann, refusing to show his BAD DATA, the world of lay truth-seekers now sees what we silenced scientists knew all along. AGW always was and remains a weirdly weaponizable “reverse-logic” scientific error, supported by the top-dog leftist scientific establishment which loved the control it implied, and which the globalist bureaucrats who fund them could and would give them. The ERROR was then brazened out by the small set of scientists needed to uphold it as valid (at least one of whom was murdered, BTW), with the encouragement of a rapidly growing FAKE GLOBAL ECONOMY that everybody from churches to China wanted to build on it.
Good LORD, what a scam. But THAT is how REAL conspiracies work. Everybody is in it for themselves, everybody deceives everybody else, and it works AUTOMATICALLY toward a common goal that a completely shielded party desires.
Think about it. Fake “global warming” and its successor “climate change” are – alone or together – quite possibly the GREATEST scientific hoaxes in MAN’S HISTORY. You can quibble about “hoax” without knowing origination, but you certainly can’t quibble about “pathological science” once you understand the process that absolutely upended normal science with POLITICS.
People will be talking about this for THOUSANDS – quite possibly MILLIONS of years.
However, it gets worse.
Originally, I suspected that the bizarre scientific proposals being offered to alleviate “climate change” – things like the chemical equivalent of throwing volcano dust into the atmosphere to cool the planet – were just academic bullshit. I assumed that these radical “geoengineering” offerings were just ridiculous byproducts of the hoax itself. I assumed that these scientists were just “acting out” – vying to be the most politically correct and scientifically radical of the bunch, for some kind of virtue signal attention other than cutting off their own dicks and breasts, or those of their own children.
But I may have been wrong.
What if these weird and radical ideas about changing the planet are actually the POINT of the hoax? What if the whole hoax was intended to GIN UP certain terra-re-forming mass processes that will undoubtedly WIN APPROVAL from the bevy of insane proposals?
I am now wondering if these “Earth-changing” ideas were in fact the GOAL of the hoax.
BIG PICTURE: What if the bottom line is “shake-n-bake-r-us”?
Are you following me? I sure hope so, because if I’m RIGHT, we are in REAL TROUBLE.
What if big, dramatic, obvious alien attack movies are a form of disinformation?
I’m just asking questions here. Because who the FUCK thinks terraforming EARTH is a good idea?
Probably not us.
The climate hoax may be falling apart, and we may be tempted to let Greta Thunberg fade into obscurity, as she surely will.
Nevertheless, I think it may be worthwhile to see what we can do to END the use of these “shilldren” to effect change for communists. Or WHOEVER would use children against humanity.
In that regard, I think the CHILD ABUSE ANGLE is indeed the one that is needed to end both SHILLDREN and TRANS KIDS as a threat to Americathe World Humanity.
IMO (speaking as a "child advocate" for Earth Day in 1969-1970) she is fighting to "emote properly" per her conditioning, and as a child is having difficulty masking. You can see her *fighting off smiles* and trying to retain her "serious" look, for which she is rewarded.
Greta's look reminds me of Bill Clinton at Ron Brown's funeral, when he realized he was on camera, and was laughing with a friend. Laughter is a natural thing, but it had the wrong optics. Clinton quickly forced a serious, frowning, sad look, but it broke up similarly.
Disinformation shills will try to tell you that Greta Thunberg’s bizarre facial expressions here are some kind of uniquely autistic problem, so you cannot figure out what they are doing to her, but they are just forwarding a human division and control meme used to hide the truth, so I would kindly ask you to CUT IT OUT. You have been TAUGHT to VIRTUE SIGNAL to this shit, and I am having NONE OF IT.
It is more important for us to break out of their mind control, than it is to grab the obvious broken weapons they leave within easy grasp. It’s why a chimp will fling SHIT instead of side-eyeing the perfect ARROWHEAD or KILLING STONE.
You following? If not, come back to this post in a couple of days. Understanding what is actually going on, is a huge, huge, mind-bending task.
We have to get past the FAKE NORMAL they created.
I grew up around all the hapless geeks and other inappropriate kids, now medicated on shooter drugs and labeled as medical freaks under expanded categories of control – kids who did NOT shoot up their schools back in my childhood, and who became all the scientists and engineers who were RETIRED AND FIRED so we would not get in the way of GLOBALIST LIES with their morally innocent imported H-1B replacements who would code any lie and
WHERE WAS I?
Oh, yes. Lovely Greta.
No – just watch her. She is stifling a smile. THAT IS ALL. You need to CONNECT WITH HER and FEEL HER CHOICE to see that this is ABUSE.
She wants to smile like a normal child, who just performed successfully for adults, and she knows that she SHOULDN’T. She’s supposed to maintain “serious Greta” – that stony face of CLIMATE SERIOUSNESS that GETS ATTENTION. The SIDESHOW FREAK FACE WE LOVE. So the signals get crossed, and she FIGHTS THE SMILES.
Trust me – I *LIVED* in that same moment. I faced the same choice.
What this child is doing is simple. She is accidentally pointing out the horrible fact that she is being REWARDED for pouting, frowning, and acting like we have to do something about money-making carbon dioxide Ponzi schemes with deeper, darker purposes RIGHT NOW or else she is going to be terribly, horribly hurt.
And we LOVE IT.
We love the FREAK SHOW.
And when she does her NEW JOB WELL – speaking to adults – LIKE I DID – she wants to smile.
THAT IS ALL.
But that is a HELL of a message, and it blows up EVERYBODY.
It blows up YOU – for believing the ways you are told to VIRTUE SIGNAL. That you need to coddle and swaddle this girl in your sympathy, and believe any lie she tells you, so that you can get your social ATTABOY / ATTAGRL REWARD for being a good person who loves poor little autistic girls that you CAN’T STOP LOOKING AT when they are made to act as FREAKS.
It blows up ME – for being a fucking child shill, just like her, who KNOWS THE SCAM, and didn’t have the GUTS to say anything until it was safe enough to even ADMIT IT to myself, much less TELL YOU.
It blows up the MEDIA – for being a PARTY to CHILD ABUSE.
It blows up the child welfare establishment – for LETTING THIS SHIT HAPPEN.
It blows up the medical establishment – for knuckling under to politically weaponized INSANITY.
It blows up social media – for being the GONG SHOW that mixes this CRAP into our brains. And these precious ASSHOLES like Jack Dorsey and Mind Control Zuckerberg have the GALL to talk about filtering out “fake news” when they SHILL A FAKE UNIVERSE and FAKE NORMAL at us every day.
I know this post you are now reading is EXTREMELY over the target, because TWITTER literally cut off the engagement of the above tweets INSTANTLY after two very fast likes. It is SO obvious. Silicon Valley and social media are working DESPERATELY to protect Greta Thunberg. The world’s greatest and SICKEST front for a deadly, world-ending SCAM.
THEY DANGLE OUR OWN CHILDREN IN FRONT OF US TO HYPNOTIZE US.
The fact is, however, that as Q says, “These people are stupid.”
You just have to wake up to see it. Slap yourself. Wake the FUCK UP and TAKE A LOOK.
FACE. THE. TRUTH.
So let’s move on to the most interesting part now. My very own experience as a child shill for Earth Day.
WOLF MOON OF THE ECO-SHILLDREN
As a seventh grader – or sevvie, as we were called – I was small, geeky, and unattractive. I wasn’t even in the gifted program, because my sixth-grade teacher had failed to get the names of her smart kids loaded into the new computerized systems that fed all the accelerated programs.
Ironically, this failure hurt mostly WOMEN, because most of the sixth-grade teacher’s smart kids were GIRLS. Nevertheless, during sixth grade, all of us were trained in a special class about digital computers, and I like to think that ONE OF THOSE GIRLS is out there, somewhere, doing the RIGHT THING about artificial intelligence.
But in seventh grade, I was a NOBODY, until something happened.
I “overperformed” – massively – in a class book report project which had to be presented as a SPEECH.
Instead of stuttering, half-cheating, reading my cards, forgetting my place, and doing all the things everybody else did, I gave a television-worthy Carl Sagan / Ken Burns act.
I was a BORN SHILL.
I might as well have thrown away my cue cards. Nobody expected it – even me. But I was so over-practiced, and so INTO what I was talking about, that it turned into something like a MOVIE. The class was MESMERIZED.
When it was over, they sat in stunned silence for a moment – and then erupted in CHEERS.
After that, I got respect. I was “one of the smart kids”. Everybody wanted to know “what I got” when grade cards came out. The same kids who ran out of the classroom spreading gossip about my “amazing speech”, would spread the word about everything I did after that.
And THAT is how the trouble began.
Well, not exactly. I’m leaving out Hitler’s Germany, World War II, the aftermath of a nuclear explosion in New Mexico, flying saucers and the early computerization of Russian data in America. But you don’t need to know those parts for now.
My eight grade teacher was SO HOT.
SO hot.
Actually, she wasn’t particularly hot, by most people’s standards, but THE CRUSH does not obey movie-casting logic of what’s “hot” and what’s not.
Between 7th and 8th grade, my body had grown in an almost unimaginable way, and I was now almost a MAN. I gained almost 50 pounds, and was now one of the BIGGER kids. I wasn’t a jock, but I now had muscles, and they WORKED. My new body was perfect for gymnastics, and I could do amazing things I could not have dreamed of the year before.
Boys respected me. Girls acknowledged I was THERE.
I looked DOWN on the girls’ tits. That was NEW.
AND YET – I still looked like a kid overall. I still had that SIDESHOW quality of being “too smart” for my appearance.
I probably could have gotten a girlfriend, but my MIND ruled my body, and as far as I knew, I was still a GEEK and a LOSER, whose only saving grace was being SMART.
So when my teacher took an interest in me – that NONE of the girls did – well – I was more than happy to go along with her ideas.
I was in the CORE of puberty at this point. I spent every unproductive moment I could checking out all the girls, having crushes on half of them, and working hard to see the beauty in the rest.
I didn’t know it yet, but I had a GIFT from GOD – the ability to “figure out” how any woman was physically beautiful in one way or another, if only by some hidden symmetry. As soon as I would figure out how said girl was “hot”, she became my newest and greatest crush. It was a wondrous ability, and I thanked God for it when I finally understood. I felt a kind of secret gleeful pity for all the guys who could not see how amazing all these girls really were.
But my teacher. OH BOY. She had LEGS that thrilled even the picky boys. She was still young enough that she didn’t seem like a MOM. She seemed like something out of TELEVISION. Everything about her was YOUTHFUL, and yet – well – she was the same age as PLAYBOY BUNNIES. She kinda looked like one, too, only REAL.
And THAT is how it started.
There must have been some motivation – some offering, competition, or reward – behind SO MANY of our teachers getting on the Earth Day bandwagon. Whatever the reason, it became CENTRAL to most of our activities.
The GIRLS in our class loved it. The idea of CLEANING STUFF UP appealed to their inner selves in some way that I fully realize sounds “sexist” as hell today, but FUCK IT – we were kids, we were raised to be the way we were, and girls back then HATED DIRT AND TRASH. Anything connected to CLEANING was marketed to women, and nobody questioned it. The girls all wanted to be liberated super-mom brain surgeons, but they wanted to CLEAN SHIT UP, TOO.
The GIRLS were SUCKERS for Earth Day. They were on it immediately. And if you were a CAD LIKE ME who wanted IN, you needed to be for Earth Day, too. It was a VIRTUE SIGNAL PARTY.
So – the bottom line is that SEX was used to sell Earth Day, but the marketing was subtle. VERY subtle. The teacher sold the GIRLS on it, and the GIRLS sold the BOYS.
Now – what does my teacher do next? CLASS DEBATE on POLLUTION as an Earth Day topic. The question: Which is more dangerous to the planet – AIR POLLUTION or WATER POLLUTION?
Oh, I was ready for this one. Ready like a MARK. I don’t remember which team I was on, but I actually believed that the OTHER form of pollution was more dangerous. But it’s a trick question.
As Q would say, “Define dangerous.” It’s a LAWYER’S GAME, but a PSYCHOLOGIST’S TAKE.
LENIN’S BIRTHDAY WINS, no matter what. The PLANNED DEINDUSTRIALIZATION OF AMERICA, in preparation for sending that industry to CHINA, was about to begin.
AND I HELPED.
As you can imagine, my debate speech for “our side” won, and I was the star of the class. The finest FEAR-MONGERING my ingenious little mind could construct. Oh, I had these kids thinking they were gonna DIE tomorrow. I remember the smiles fading from their faces in horror.
Of course our side won. Are you kidding? These kids were now afraid to WALK HOME.
Scare Wolf had done his job.
In a kind of silently learned (see Greta Thunberg) faux magnanimity, I “admitted” that I really thought the other form of pollution was even MORE dangerous than the one I had so effectively argued, thus swooning ALL THE GIRLS, as the new Maple Castro of Eighth Grade, and uniting our class in baby communist solidarity that somebody better fix this shit now, because it was even more dangerous than I had PROVEN.
Yes, I was a slimy little sucker, but we’re talking GIRLS. Surely you understand! I know Bill Clinton would.
The next thing you know, the HOTTEST WOMAN ON THE PLANET, with the BEST LEGS IN THE UNIVERSE had even MORE plans for me. It was time to bring my extremely convincing speech to the ENTIRE SCHOOL. I would be giving my speech – with some modifications that she and I would work out in private sessions after school – to ALL THE HOT GIRLS WHO LOVED EARTH DAY.
I mean – how could I say no? It’s not like cultural Marxism wasn’t just a FEW YEARS from bringing such fantasies out into the open – and then, a few years later, making them a REALITY.
This was the beginning of an intoxicating – and clearly toxic – relationship. This was EXACTLY like those situations I would find myself in, years later, fighting off inappropriate relationships in the university or the workplace.
Or NOT fighting them off. Anybody who has ever met a boyfriend, girlfriend, fiance or spouse through an office romance knows exactly what I’m talking about.
Now – let me get things right out in the open, and not resort to cultural Marxist teasing to keep your attention.
I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMAN.
But I would be lying if I didn’t admit to having ENDLESS fantasies about it.
This woman had me on a string, and I desperately wanted to be there. We literally RUINED EACH OTHER in a kind of virtual pedophilia.
She KNEW – she absolutely had to know – that I was utterly smitten with her. But – and this is key – she did not “disabuse me of any notions” while I was useful to the cause. She let it drag on, and she would have kept letting it drag on, had I not been SLAPPED to my senses by reality.
It was when her HUSBAND showed up unannounced, at the same time as one of our little after-school planning sessions, that I WOKE THE HELL UP. This guy was a REAL MAN. No – more. He was a MENSCH. I was a kid. The whole thing was RIDICULOUS. My “psychological erection” vanished.
At the time, I didn’t interpret things properly. I thought that maybe she brought him there to “cool me off”. Now, I tend to believe that her husband was starting to wonder about things, given that her plans began to involve nighttime events without him. There WERE adult male teachers at the school. They weren’t stupid, either. If there was anybody naive in the mix, it was probably ME.
OR it could have been even weirder. The teacher’s husband may have understood his broken wife’s need for male attention, and realized that she was getting sucked into an inappropriate relationship that needed intervention. Maybe she was playing games, because the guy was clearly a keeper, and was apparently spending time away from HER. Whatever it was, he showed up, and my stint as a childhood eco-shill Romeo stumbled to an embarrassing end.
Now all of that is getting a bit ahead of the story, but I wanted you to understand not only the SEXUAL COMPONENT of my time as a child eco-shill, but also the weird way that pedophilia simply DOGS leftism. I tend to think now that it’s important – that SEX is a key motivator in all these leftist temptations and manipulations.
Animals. They use us like ANIMALS.
Back to the school speech. This is where I was introduced to the beginnings of politics and intellectual compromise. Teachers inevitably LEAD students by encouraging some things, discouraging other things, and even suggesting still others. This is understandable. However, in preparing THIS speech, the level of insertions, suggestions, and modifications made me feel significantly less “pride of ownership” than I had in – for example – my amazing seventh grade speech.
Even my class debate speech, filled with other people’s ideas, at least had been arranged by me in a way that felt “all mine” as some kind of composer and conductor.
I was already feeling uneasy that this wasn’t really my speech any more. But there was one line that REALLY BOTHERED ME.
There was one point of argument that I simply did not want to make. It involved trophy fishing. I did not know if it was relevant, important, or even TRUE. It sounded a bit like propaganda to me. It sounded GREAT, but it sounded like it could be easily called out. I knew a bit about the subject – not enough to call it out myself, but enough to think it might very well be hokey.
My inner fact-checker was dubious. FUTURE WOLF WAS SHOWING UP.
The teacher was really attached to it. It made her smile. And I was really attached to her. I liked to see her smile.
OH, WHAT THE HELL.
I could slip it past the kids, but not necessarily certain adults. However, this speech was just for kids and teachers who also loved Earth Day. So IN IT WENT, and I figured it was fine.
The speech went really well. NOT AS WELL as my “authentic” speeches, but this speech was IMPORTANT, and I told myself that it was OK that people weren’t as enthusiastic.
There was a part of me that wanted to admit the truth – that I was both compromising principles and seeing the result of that compromise – but this clashed with my inappropriate adoration of my teacher, so I stuffed that thought back where it would not bother me.
Based on this success, the teacher wanted me to give the speech to several community groups. This was now “beyond extra credit”. This meant more speech preparations outside class hours, and some evenings out.
I avoided even thinking about this stuff for years. What little I do remember is easily described as cringeworthy.
I only remember one speech in significant detail – the one I mentioned at the beginning. To me, that night represented a confluence of good and evils – all wrapped in the uncertainty of which was which.
I was very nervous about the speech. I did NOT like that one line. To me it felt like I was professing knowledge I did not have. It was, in my opinion, the WEAK POINT of the whole speech. The problem – my teacher was insistent that we keep it. Her reasoning was purely political, and a classic example of left-wing presumptions. She reasoned that the audience contained “rich businessmen” who would be influenced by the point, because – if true – it might impact them personally – not professionally. It was important to influence them. Perhaps, but what I was saying was not something that I could state with any authority or true knowledge. It violated some inner standard that demanded a higher burden of familiarity. Among fishermen – and more particularly fishers of men, it was the kind of bullshit I hated. I could not say it authentically. Worse still, I wasn’t even sure it was TRUE.
It’s funny, but had I KNOWN LESS, it would have been easier to speak the line. But in KNOWING, I had a responsibility toward the TRUTH.
Her insistence bordered on getting annoyed with me. For some reason, this HAD to stay in. PERIOD. So I relented.
The speech went well – outwardly. A few nodded as I gave it. Nobody booed. Everybody clapped at the end. Nobody had any serious questions for me – at least that I can remember. I think I remember being happy about that. The teacher was definitely happy about it. That part made me happy.
However, several things simply BOTHERED me. I could just FEEL that something was WRONG. The fact that there were no questions made me realize that it was probably because I was a KID. Something seemed very wrong about that. It wasn’t FAIR to give a speech where KIDS could argue back, but ADULTS felt they could not. And some of the people RESENTED me. I could FEEL IT. I could SEE IT in their faces. Their FACES HAUNTED ME.
WHY? WHY did they resent me?
It would be YEARS before I truly understood. Even more, before I admitted WHY the whole thing made me uncomfortable.
In the end, I was very happy that the teacher’s husband showed up. We never did the “last” speech. His appearance RESCUED me from what began as infatuation, and ended as disillusionment. I returned to a respectful relationship with my teacher. I think she must have “snapped out of it”, too. However, there was a twist ending.
Something happened to her. She disappeared from the junior high, but showed up later teaching at a nearby high school. Her personality was completely different. She was like a different person. She even LOOKED different. Others noticed the difference, too. She never even acknowledged my presence. It was like she had completely forgotten about me – or wanted to forget.
I was glad, and let it be. I had enough problems – new problems – in high school. And thankfully, many of them involved girls of my own age, or slightly younger. I was finally growing up normally.
EPILOGUE
I’ll be very blunt. Kids should not be used for politics. Nobody will ever convince me that it’s a good thing for kids to get involved in politics.
Observing? Learning? Maybe. And that’s a very weak “maybe”.
Learning ABOUT government and politics has its uses.
Otherwise, keep politics OUT.
The student-teacher relationship strikes me as a sacred thing, just like the doctor-patient relationship. Politics can do nothing but corrupt it.
Now – about global warming.
SOMETHING is very, very, very wrong here.
If I have to take TWO changes to the planet’s atmosphere…
(1) one that is actually evolutionarily forseeable – the eventual burning of fossil fuels, appearing in every graph I can see as a kind of CARBON SALVATION that extends human habitation and even LIFE ITSELF, and
(2) one that is untried, untested, is even more shockingly is based on radical ANTI-LIFE principles learned from EXTINCTION EVENTS in Earth’s history,
then the CONSERVATIVE solution is to go with the natural, evolutionarily forseeable change – NOT the “cold-death extinction chemistry” being suggested by SHILLS, MONEY-GRUBBERS, FAKE POPES, COMMUNISTS, and used-car-sales types who say “we gotta do something completely ridiculous NOW”.
I mean, just RE-READ what I wrote there.
This “climate change” as an excuse to TERRAFORM EARTH is BULLSHIT and you know it.
People just don’t have the courage to stand up to it.
Well WOLF is here to kick their ASSES and say STAND UP.
HERE is how we do it.
First things first, GET THE HELL RID OF FAKE NEWS.
I mean, kick this shit to the CURB.
Next – FAKE ENTERTAINMENT. It’s NOT what you think it is. It’s MIND CONTROL.
Get rid of it.
Next, FAKE SCIENCE. QUESTION IT.
You don’t have to be a scientist to TALK BACK to FAKE SCIENCE.
It is your RIGHT as a HUMAN BEING to TALK BACK TO IT.
QUESTION THIS SHIT.
Lastly, one of the biggest things you can do is RE-READ Q. RE-READ QANON. Only this time, THINK BIG. THINK BIGGER. THINK BIGGEST.
Ask what would make most of science and religion TRUE – even if it blows your mind.
Let a LOT of possibilities FILL YOUR BRAIN. Look for the answers that EXPLAIN EVERYTHING.
The chances are, THE ACTUAL ANSWERS WILL BE IN THAT SET.
This past afternoon I was thinking about what I am going to do for those Sundays coming up when I will be traveling and not able to compose the usual on-the-spot posts that often happen pretty close to the beginning of Sunday (but sometimes arriving a tad bit late to our WQ Tree House).
I thought about an excellent fictional book series that I believe carries many important messages for us in the time we are living in. There’s a good number of books in the series. I could have covered a book per Sunday. But that just didn’t quite fit right.
What to do?
I thought about Psalm 119. Another good basis for a series.
But, no, still not it.
And then I recalled how strongly Candace and Steve’s conversation about the leftist media being cowards struck me yesterday. So there’s that.
Maybe a series based on the qualities of a Patriot? We shall see. But for today, we will ponder the quality of Steadfast Fortitude or Courage.
In church tradition, fortitude is often used when reflecting on the character of the martyrs. Fortitude is closely related to faithfulness, a fruit of the Holy Spirit.
FAITHFULNESS (πίστις)
“God is faithful” (1 Cor. 1:9. cf. Rom. 3:3), not as having faith, but as being constant (cf. 1 Cor. 10:13), trustworthy (cf. 2 Cor. 1:18). It is a divine quality. The martyrs were “faithful unto death” (Rev. 2:10), not vacillating at the face of bodily harm and suffering, imitating thus their Lord “Jesus Christ the faithful martyr” (Rev. 1:5. cf. 3:14).
In lieu of an example from the life of a Saint, we quote the following lines from the Wisdom of Solomon, read in the Vespers service for Martyrs:
“The souls of the righteous are in the hand of God, and no torment will ever touch them. In the eyes of the foolish they seemed to have died, and their departure was thought to be a disaster, and their going from us to be their destruction; but they are at peace.
For though in the sight of others they were punished, their hope is full of immortality. Having been disciplined a little, they will receive great good, because God tested them and found them worthy of Himself; like gold in the furnace He tried them, and like a sacrificial burnt offering He accepted them.
In the time of their visitation they will shine forth, and will run like sparks through the stubble. They will govern nations and rule over peoples, and the Lord will reign over them forever.
Those who trust in Him will understand truth, and the faithful will abide with Him in love, because grace and mercy are upon His holy ones, and He watches over His elect” (Wis. of Sol. 3:1-9).
An important component to fortitude seems to be a quality of perseverance.
Can you think of anyone that has recently demonstrated fortitude in the public arena?
An interesting thought about how one goes about developing fortitude comes from the idea that it is a fruit.
That is, it is something we grow in our character, not something we build or think our way into. It has to come from something we have developed. Like learning to field balls behind 2nd base in baseball. You don’t just go out there and instantly do it well. But it’s not just an internal skill as you might think of will power or the like. No, it’s more like learning to dance.
We are learning to do hard things within the context of our trusting relationship with the One who leads in this dance called life.
And we will not go far without steadfast fortitude.
Today there is a planned confrontation (street brawl?) in Portland.
Oath Keepers have made a statement.
This is a time for discipline.
August 15, 2019
Public Notice: Oath Keepers Will NOT be Participating in the August 17, 2019 “End Domestic Terrorism” Rally in Portland, OR
by Stewart Rhodes
I wish I didn’t have to do this, but it must be done. I must make it clear that Oath Keepers will not be participating in the “End Domestic Terrorism” rally scheduled for this Saturday, August 17, 2019, which is being organized by Joe Biggs and the Proud Boys.
I must also make it clear that Oath Keepers is NOT an organizer of this event, as has been erroneously reported by some media outlets. This event is being organized by Joe Biggs and the Proud Boys, not Oath Keepers. Oath Keepers was invited to attend, but we will not be attending.
We fully support free speech, and we fully agree that Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization that uses force and the threatened use of force to intimidate, silence, and suppress the free speech of Americans. However, we cannot participate in this event for the following reasons: A. We have not seen adequate steps taken by the organizers to exclude known or suspected white nationalists from attending this event. Oath Keepers has a zero tolerance policy for white nationalism or any other ethno-nationalist ideology that discriminates along racial lines (as our bylaws make clear) and we do not, and cannot, knowingly associate with known or suspected white nationalists.
First, we consider white nationalists (along with any other ethno-nationalists) to be dangerous domestic enemies of the Constitution, every bit as deadly to our Republic as the violent communists within Antifa, because white nationalists also hold the Constitution in contempt and wish to overthrow it and replace it with their own desired totalitarian system. On that, the white nationalists and the communists are in agreement. And all of us who swore to defend the Constitution must stand against both of them as clear domestic enemies of the Constitution.
Second, we have a considerable number of active duty military and police in our membership who cannot knowingly associate with racists and we owe it to them to be diligent in avoiding participating in any event where white nationalists will not be actively, stringently excluded.
Third, the left in this nation is desperate to paint all conservatives and, especially, all Trump supporters as “white nationalists” to the point of absurdity. Allowing any actual white nationalists into an event where attendees are encouraged to bring Trump flags as well as American flags would be a grave mistake and does no favors to either President Trump or to the broader conservative cause. Conservatives, libertarians, and Trump supporters must be diligent about making sure the events they organize exclude white nationalists who want the same thing the left wants – to paint the false impression that we agree with their racist, collectivist, anti-constitution agenda (which is exactly why CNN loves to give airtime to the white nationalist troll Richard Spencer, as he desperately tries to tie his Neo-Nazi agenda to Trump).
I want to stress that we at Oath Keepers DO NOT believe that Joe Biggs or Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, the two organizers of this event, are white nationalists. Nor do we believe that the great majority of those groups and individuals who plan on attending the event are white nationalists. But we do not believe the organizers are taking the steps necessary to ensure that white nationalist and suspected white nationalist groups and individuals will be excluded.
A closely related problem is that the organizers have not secured a permit for exclusive use of the Waterfront Park where they will be holding the rally this Saturday in Portland. Yes, they still have a right to free speech, but one of the advantages of securing a permit to use a public space for a particular time is that it allows you to exclude others from using that same space at that time, such as excluding known or suspected white nationalists.
We saw the problems a lack of a permit can bring when we helped to protect a free speech event in Berkeley, CA in April, 2017. That was an un-permitted event, and because the event organizers had not secured a permit for exclusive use of the MLK park, they could not exclude the white nationalists group Identity Evropa from entering the park. Identity Evropa promptly placed themselves and their anti-Semitic, racist signs front and center, facing off with Antifa.
I instructed those under our command in the event security element that under no circumstances were they to allow Identity Evropa to enter our security inner perimeter around the audience and the stage. I was willing to go to jail to prevent Identity Evropa from actually entering the audience for the event, but we could not kick them out of the park. And, of course, the media all focused their cameras on Identity Evropa. We were able to maintain some separation between them and the event we were securing, but it did give Identity Evropa the opportunity to attempt to co-opt the event for their own agenda.
For this event in Portland, in contrast to the April 2017 event in Berkeley, Oath Keepers is not in charge of the security element and, if we attended this Saturday, we would not be able to actively exclude suspected white nationalists as we did in Berkeley. As such, we cannot attend. B. Some of the past rhetoric, public statements, and memes/graphics posted online by the event organizer and by planned attendees expose those who attend the August 17 rally to possible civil and criminal law liability.
We understand the anger and frustration among patriots after watching the footage of the violent Antifa attack on Andy Ngo on June 29, 2019 and the horrific attack on two other patriots that same day. However, angry, undisciplined public statements that can be construed as expressing an intent to come to Portland to seek out Antifa and engage them in street fights and to assault them, and memes posted online to that effect, or worse, do a disservice to anyone who wants to attend a free speech event in protest against Antifa terrorism and against the failure of Portland officials to secure the free speech rights of Americans.
Those angry statements cannot be undone, and despite the organizers and planned attendees subsequently dialing back on the rhetoric, those prior statements are already being used against them by their political opponents and by the leftist dominated media. All of the angry videos,Twitter posts, and incriminating photos, etc by the organizer leading up to this rally have been preserved by Antifa and their supporters. Likewise for memes/graphics posted by planned attendees depicting violence against Antifa.
Further, those prior statements, videos, photos, and memes/graphics by the event organizer and other planned attendees potentially expose all attendees to possible prosecution using both an Oregon state “rioting” statute and a federal rioting statute that was used on some of the attendees of the disastrous Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally in August, 2017 (which Oath Keepers also did NOT attend). Even though the vast majority of the planned attendees for the Portland rally this Saturday have no intention of initiating unlawful violence against Antifa, the prior statements of the event organizer, expressing his intent, can potentially be used against all attendees.
I share the frustrations many patriots feel about the obvious double standard of Antifa having free rein in Portland while patriots are under the microscope. But I cannot and will not expose Oath Keepers members to possible persecution/prosecution because of undisciplined statements made by others, however understandable the anger that prompted the undisciplined statements. Therefore, I must urge all Oath Keepers members to stay clear of this event in Portland on August 17, 2019. C. More Than Ever, This is a Time for Discipline and Professionalism
Because of their own actions, Antifa is currently on the ropes and is on the verge of being declared a domestic terrorist organization. Much has taken place since Joe Biggs first announced his intent to hold this rally. First, on July 13, 2019, the self-identified Antifa terrorist Willem Van Spronsen used a rifle and Molotov cocktails to attack the ICE detention facility in Tacoma, WA. Only by the grace of God was he not able to kill responding officers. Van Spronsen pointed his AR-15 at the officers, but it apparently malfunctioned, and he was shot and killed before he could fix that malfunction. He also failed in his attempt to ignite a 500 lb propane tank. If he had been successful, it could have killed all the personnel and the detainees in the center. Thankfully he was an incompetent terrorist.
Since that attack, Antifa has lauded Van Spronsen as a martyr and an example to follow, and, in the graphics promoting their planned assault on the border in El Paso, Texas September 1-10, Antifa has openly threatened to kill CBP personnel.
And, of course, Antifa widely celebrated the July 12 illegal trespassing at the Aurora, CO ICE facility where protesters tore down the American flag, attempted to burn it, and in its place hoisted up the Mexican flagand also flew a defaced, upside down “blue lives matter” flag with “Abolish ICE” written on it in red.
And most recently, at 3am on August 13, 2019, shots were fired into the occupied ICE offices in San Antonio, Texas.
A maxim of warfare, expressed by Napoleon Bonaparte, is to “never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.” Patriots, conservatives, Trump supporters, all need to be disciplined and let Antifa continue to show their true colors. It would be counterproductive to engage in undisciplined activities (or in a rally who’s main organizer made undisciplined statements of intent) that can be construed by the media and politicians to paint patriots as the aggressors and Antifa as the victims.
Frankly, given the prior statements of Joe Biggs that will be used against all attendees of his rally, it would be best for the patriot/conservative cause if this August 17 rally were simply canceled. Those who want to protest the way Portland coddles Antifa should start over, with a clean slate, and then do so in a much more disciplined manner.
In addition to the above noted Antifa terrorism, after the mass shootings in California, El Paso, and Ohio, we are in a decidedly “kinetic” (guns and bombs) environment and we should expect Antifa to use even more deadly force as they go full “Weather Underground” in their revolutionary communist-terrorist trajectory. Expect it.
As such, Oath Keepers will be very disciplined about what events we participate in, and we are currently instructing our members to focus on publicly supporting and directly backing up ICE and CBP personnel in a disciplined, purely defensive posture, using only clearly lawful self defense and defense of others, and to focus on our upcoming operation in El Paso, TX where we will also be assisting in securing private property (including homes) against deadly threat by Antifa.
If the event organizers do continue on with their planned event this Saturday, we sincerely hope it goes off without a hitch and is peaceful and successful. But Oath Keepers will be focusing our resources elsewhere.
For the Republic,
Stewart Rhodes
Founder and National President of Oath Keepers Credits: Author, Stewart Rhodes at OathKeepers.org Recommended by andyocoregon here at WQTH
Let’s P.R.A.Y.!
Whatever the outcome today, may I suggest to include this struggle in our prayers. Thy Kingdom Come. Thy Will Be Done. Think *3
Let me put the KILL SHOT on these “red flag laws” right up front.
Hard to read that graphic. Let’s make things just a bit more clear.
Now you MAY be saying “BUT WOLF – THAT’S NOT THE SECOND AMENDMENT – THAT’S THE *FIRST* AMENDMENT!“
To which I say “EXACTLY.“
Here is the explanation. It is, for lack of a better metaphor, how the Second Amendment and the First Amendment PEACEFULLY protect each other – by saying WWG1WGA.
Any “red flag law” that doesn’t EXPLICITLY PROTECT – better still EXCLUDE – all Constitutionally protected speech, beliefs, associations, and assembly, is not worth the paper that it’s written on.
The reason is that, absent explicit protections and exclusions, such laws may be interpreted in practice to deny citizens of their First Amendment freedoms – particularly SPEECH – by construing protected activities to be in conflict with other rights – specifically our SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
(This stuff used to be common knowledge before American crypto-Sovietism, by the way.)
This has often been referred to as a “chilling effect” – a sneaky form of infringement which is typically brought forth under the guise of laws utterly unrelated to speech, religion, or other First Amendment-protected activities. Enemies of First Amendment exercise will “hold other rights hostage” in a way that “chills” our claim to those First Amendment rights, lest we see the OTHER rights denied or potentially infringed. In almost ALL these cases, the parties backing such laws desire to infringe on BOTH freedoms, but will take either one, by constructing a FAILED law which puts them into apparent conflict.
The Constitution says NO – there IS no valid conflict, and if you are attempting to create one, even accidentally, then you are creating UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW.
Wolf Moon, Annoying Patriot, and Son of the American Revolution
SO BTFO, COMMUNISTS!
Republican lawmakers who think it necessary to have such “red flag” laws should TAKE NOTE before signing them. An ABSENCE of explicit Constitutional protections of SPEECH is, in my humble opinion, sufficient reason to veto ANY such legislation.
Our GENIUS President, Donald J. Trump, has personally given a demonstration of how this works, in a joking (well…. who knows…..) tweet. AND I QUOTE:
Would Chris Cuomo be given a Red Flag for his recent rant? Filthy language and a total loss of control. He shouldn’t be allowed to have any weapon. He’s nuts!
There you have it – the REALITY of “red flag” laws for millions of wonderful, trustworthy, but perhaps “not careful with their tongues” Americans. INCLUDING CHRIS CUOMO! Who I don’t particularly like, but whose rights to angrily argue and own a gun I will defend to the DEATH!
The responses were uniformly BRUTAL for red flag laws.
SO – let’s look at this more closely.
Is Jack Posobiec right? Are “red flag” laws unconstitutional?
In my opinion, red flag laws CAN be constitutional. But I am not even sure if ANY of the existing ones are. And THAT is scary.
Ohio is proposing a red flag law which is designed to avoid many of the pitfalls of existing red flag laws. But even the proposed Ohio law really “needs some work”, in my opinion.
First of all, red flag laws need to respect both the SECOND and FOURTH Amendments.
Here is Dick Heller, of the famous Heller case, talking to OAN about this:
The SECOND Amendment is rather obvious. The FOURTH Amendment is more concerned with warrants, seizure of property, and probable cause – all of which are made more sketchy in red flag laws, when a JUDGE has not actually reviewed the evidence with opposing counsel present. THINK FISA COURT. Gun SEIZURE without the ability to challenge it IMMEDIATELY or better still BEFOREHAND is an idea that does not sit well with this here critter.
Now WOLF MOON – who thinks SCOTUS got the “gay marriage” thing all wrong by not using the FIRST AMENDMENT to protect both gay marriage AND polygamy, is often in the habit of picking DIFFERENT Amendments to defend freedoms. This time is NO DIFFERENT.
Yes, I agree with the Second and the Fourth, but I believe that the SIXTH and the FIRST are also very important here. We’ve talked about the FIRST – what about the SIXTH?
Some people might be A-OK with the idea of just giving up their guns, not being arrested, and arguing about it all later, but NOT THIS HERE WOLF.
“I WANT AN ARRESS!”
In fact. to be completely clear, I want an arrest, and a hearing with MY LAWYER and a JUDGE, and I want it BEFORE my guns are taken. This gives me my MAXIMUM rights under BOTH the Fourth and the Sixth Amendments.
Trust me – THIS OPTION is the most Constitutional of all. I will have WAIVED NO RIGHTS in picking this option.
SO – let me summarize. In my opinion, a potentially Constitutional red flag law must:
not take away my stringently guaranteed 2nd Amendment rights without due cause
respect the due processes of the 4th Amendment in a HUGE and optimal way
explicitly guarantee my FULL 1st Amendment rights, NEVER using protected speech, beliefs, or activities in any fashion to take away my 2nd Amendment rights
better still, EXPLICITLY EXCLUDE all 1st Amendment protected things, including speech, writings, religion, beliefs, assembly, associations, and memberships
allow arrest without seizure and a prompt hearing with legal representation, for MAXIMUM 4th and 6th Amendment rights
include strong deterrents for abuse in BOTH criminal AND civil law
Are you starting to see how much difference current red flag laws have from this ideal, with the ideal probably passing review by SCOTUS, and current laws actually being somewhat doubtful?
I’m kinda thinking Jack Posobiec is right.
NOW – let’s look at an example. This will demonstrate both the Constitutional requirements AND how SAFE a properly constructed “red flag” law could actually be – if enforced HONESTLY by HONEST law enforcement, including an HONEST FBI (cough, cough, COUGH, COUGH).
I have a person who believes in a CRAZY RELIGION. The crazy religion says that in order to go to heaven, one has to defend the religion violently against all non-believers, cutting off their heads. This person goes online and AGREES WITH ALL THIS, repeats it, and argues vociferously and ANGRILY for it, because he is a MUSLIM.
But in real life, he’s a nice guy, and has never even struck anybody.
Sorry – according to WOLF’S version of a CONSTITUTIONAL red flag law, this guy cannot even be “red-flagged”, and if anybody tries it, Peaceful Angry Muslim has grounds to SUE.
Like it or not, what YOU consider “crazy beliefs” are PROTECTED by the First Amendment.
Even VIOLENT BELIEFS are protected by the First Amendment.
EVEN HATE SPEECH and ANGRY SPEECH are protected by the First Amendment.
Even HATE GROUP ASSOCIATIONS and MEMBERSHIPS are protected by the First Amendment.
EVEN CRAZY SPEECH AND BELIEFS ARE PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
Violent actions are NOT protected.
So Violent-Talking Angry Muslim who never hurts anybody gets his gun.
Are we done yet? Can we still SAFELY have “red flag” laws with all these Constitutional protections and restraints?
Sadly, the answer is NO.
No, because the HOLDER/MUELLER/LYNCH/COMEY FBI – still politicized as hell, is DESPERATELY pushing for those unconstitutional, Nazi-style laws of the LEFT…..
Check out this FBI political move against 1A/2A in Ohio. Bust a kid in mom's basement for ranting about Waco (as in, protected speech), and then count MOM and DAD'S GUNS and AMMO in the "horrifying" numbers.
Here is the article. I URGE YOU TO READ IT – especially between the lines. You will see how this is 99% propaganda of the moment. Digging up old posts to push for NAZI gun laws.
They took this kid’s PARENTS’ GUNS to spice up the numbers, took his posts to paint him as a danger, and DESPERATELY tried to create a SECOND PUNCH after DUBIOUS DAYTON.
Only – well – it’s kind of a FAIL.
This is exactly the political stuff that the now-ruined CLINTON-OBAMA FBI pulled on President Trump. So do you know what I think now?
I think there is excellent reason to believe that the HOLDER FBI has been pulling ALL of these sketchy gun-ban propaganda mass shootings. The only difference here is that they’re running low on “MK specials” who can be manipulated into pulling off their shit. So they’re resorting to backing up their DAYTON SATAN mass shooter with a KID who – wonder of wonders – lives in the same state.
SAD, SAD, SAD.
This is why red flag laws are communist bullshit. They are not only of sketchy probable FBI / Deep State origin and definite FBI propaganda backing – they are simply TOO ABUSABLE.
Sorry – even if I saw a red flag law that EXCEEDED my recommendations here, I tend to believe that it would STILL BE ABUSED by political elements in the FBI.
Remember – your greatest gift to President Trump is FIVE WORDS: I AM PRAYING FOR YOU
2nd Amendment Sunday
Well, it’s really quite the hot August and there are a lot of chores to be done around our place. To be honest, the number of really excellent threads inspires me. To not be very wordy. To allow for some strong conversations here…
If you’re not familiar with “red flag” laws, then you had best get there quickly. This new attack on the Second Amendment is actually WAY WORSE than any previous one, and constitutes what may be the most cunning attack on the CORE values of America EVER. The more I have learned about these laws, and analyzed them beyond that, the more alarmed I have become.
Or try this:
2h ℕ𝔼𝕆ℕ ℝ𝔼𝕍𝕆𝕃𝕋Verified Account@NeonRevolt
This is the future @mitchellvii wants.
Blair CottrellVerified Account@RealBlairCottrell
FYI in Australia we have no right to firearms, need licenses, gun safes bolted to the floor and wall, ammo stored in seperate compartments, regular check-ups by state agencies etc and “red flag laws” have always been a thing here.
A colleague of mine had his firearms confiscated by the state after attending a rally against immigration policy. He took the state to court and after several months won his case and was able to recover his firearms, only to have the state then cancel his firearms license on a separate technicality, related to his “unsuitable character”.
Another colleague who was a regular attendee at political rallies has had his property raided by police at least three times in the past eighteen months, police claim to be “searching for illegal firearms”. They never find any and have no reason to believe they will, officers carrying out the raids have verbally apologised to him after each search, informing him that they’re just following orders.
Another man I know was gun pointed inside his own home by police after getting involved in a brief fist-fight with Antifa, after trying to attend the Milo event in Melbourne’s North. His wife and children watched their father cuffed at gun point inside his own house, before being taken to the police station to be questioned, then charged with “affray” –But the charge was later dropped.
This is what “red-flag laws” will get you in America. Regardless of the noble excuses the state and its pawns will make, this is how these laws are actually used in practice.
At first, I was only gathering and looking at OTHER PEOPLE’S concerns. But then I started thinking about things on my own. I started putting FACTS together. I started asking what the EFFECTS of red flag laws – already known in Australia – would be on America.
I suddenly realized what is going on.
El Paso and Dayton are not merely about this election. They are about REVERSING THE TRUMP PHENOMENON for good. They are about UNDOING the “Q” movement. They are about restoring the FAKE NEWS. They are about SAVING GLOBALISM and DESTROYING AMERICANISM. And AMERICA.
And yet, it almost seems like we’re sleepwalking right into these damn things.
So here you go. THIS is what these SICK laws are actually all about.
10. Red flag laws make SPEECH a RISK.
This was a profound realization – that RED FLAG LAWS CHILL FREE SPEECH FOR GUN OWNERS. Almost all of whom support TRUMP, by the way. Real “coincidence” there.
Gun owners CANNOT afford to “take chances” and “say the wrong thing”.
Think about what I just said. Think how ORWELLIAN that is.
What this means, then, is that Red Flag laws are in fact a profound attack on the FIRST Amendment, disguised as an attack on the SECOND Amendment.
They create an ARTIFICIAL CONTRADICTION between the FIRST and SECOND Amendments.
They conflate speech and violence on LEFTIST IDEOLOGICAL TERMS – using leftist minds as judges – just like Vysotsky’s Soviet ANTIFA does. Just like ANTIFA was DESIGNED to do.
ANTIFA, filled with boys who call themselves girls, and girls who call themselves boys, who says speech is violence, and violence is speech.
This is sneaky as hell. Frankly, I cannot imagine that even a cunning POS like Cryin’ Chuck, or a shifty old witch like CHI-FI, could think this stuff up.
Let me put it this way. If it wan’t CHINA that came up with red flag, it was probably ALIENS.
Pencil-necks. You know what I’m saying. THESE GUYS.
SCHIFF TEE PHONE HOME
9. Red flag laws turn neighbor against neighbor.
Again, this is incredibly insidious. Of course, COMMUNISTS and NAZIS love to DIVIDE people, but Americans? HOLY MOLY. I want to get along with my liberal neighbors. All this is going to do is generate suspicions and recriminations.
Yes, the COMMUNISTS who have taken over the Democrat party probably want MORE DIVISION, but that is the OPPOSITE of what Trump wants.
So why should we do it? As TRUMP supporters, we don’t WANT more division and suspicion.
8. Anonymous reporting makes political abuse a certainty.
Being able to CONFRONT ONE’S ACCUSER is a CORNERSTONE of our Constitutional rights. This is the SIXTH Amendment. This is the heart of DUE PROCESS.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Sixth Amendment
This ability to confront accusers, before FINAL ACTION is taken, serves to LIMIT the power of anonymous accusations or suspicions. People cannot “get what they want” by an accusation without DEFENDING IT FIRST in a courtroom.
At least, that was the way it was SUPPOSED to work.
SIDEBAR: Note that there is an opposite problem, when the media and FBI only work for one party, in that anonymous PUBLIC accusations are the only recourse – WHISTLE-BLOWING, basically.
Yes, we have something called “anonymous tips”. But in that case, police are required to investigate and THEN decide based upon their OWN investigation if there is REASONABLE CAUSE to take action. With “red flag” laws, police are compelled to act BEFORE there is even proof of a crime. Unproven accusations are usable to CONFISCATE ARMS – the FINAL ACTION of the process. THIS IS BACKWARDS LOGIC.
This is COMMUNIST and POLITICAL.
Once again, Communists are up to their FAVORITE TRICK – the politicization of processes. Just like the Communists now running the Democrat Party politicized the DOJ and FBI, now they want to politicize local policing. They did this with their “Promise Program” that destroyed due process in Parkland, and now they want to “go big” with destruction of due process, by taking the concept nationally, using “red flag”.
There is excellent reason to believe that POLITICAL OPERATIVES will use red flag laws to harass their enemies – meaning US. We have already seen incidents of this – the SWATTING of innocent people – in states and nations that have these laws. Australia is particularly bad.
I actually have personal experience with this. I had forgotten all about it, until today.
During the 2016 Trump campaign, I was falsely accused of illegal gun carry in a felony zone by anonymous Trump opponents. This was something of a mild “swatting”, and I was very fortunate, because the police didn’t believe the complaint (which I then proved was a lie). Since then, there have been TWO entrapment attempts on me, quite possibly orchestrated by federal agents of some kind.
Political harassment using law enforcement is REAL and very dangerous.
Wolf Moon
SO – do I personally believe that “red flag” laws will be abused? ABSOLUTELY. And I predict with CERTAINTY that they will be abused against ME, if passed in my state, or nationally.
I repeat – 100% certain that they will be used against me, because of this blog.
7. Solving rifle murders before illegal alien murders is illogical.
Just look at this graph.
This shows the power of the FAKE NEWS to distort the world in favor of DEMOCRAT GOALS.
The YUGE bar on the left is murders by illegal aliens.
The thin sliver on the right is murders by rifles. ALL of them.
Red flag laws will only solve a FRACTION of the deaths by rifles, on the right.
But now let’s consider theoretical “green flag” laws, which would treat illegal aliens like gun owners. We would deport the illegal aliens, based on anonymous tips, without THEIR due process rights. They would then be vetted like gun owners, and – if “safe”, they would be let back into the United States. Even as illegals, but safe ones, we would let them back in. ALL the safe ones. Who knows – maybe MOST of them would come back in. But no matter how many, let’s presume that we only let the safe ones back in. The murderers DON’T get back in.
This theoretically solves ALL of the murders on the left.
ALL OF THEM.
So why aren’t we pursuing GREEN FLAG LAWS FIRST?
Maybe because Democrat Communists don’t WANT us to solve the bigger problem. Maybe because THEIR biggest problem is actually TRUMP VOTERS – and not murders using rifles OR murders by illegals.
6. Red flag laws deprive us of the rights we are due upon arrest.
This is subtle, but it is YUGE. I mean it – this is a BIGGIE.
This is why, if there is ever a national “red flag” law, I believe that it MUST have a “voluntary arrest option“, that GIVES ME MY FULL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS *BEFORE* TAKING MY GUNS.
In fact, the ONLY red flag law that I believe will ultimately pass muster with SCOTUS, is one that allows the accused the option to say “You can detain ME, but you cannot take my guns. Not until I have seen a judge with my lawyer present.” At that point, the police enter the person into NORMAL processing, which brings the accused before a judge in a timely manner, and ALL NORMAL RIGHTS ARE GRANTED. This path is almost guaranteed to be fully Constitutional. And the DEMOCRATS are undoubtedly going to hate it, because it will turn the tables on these damnable laws, ending their abuse SWIFTLY in a flurry of expensive lawsuits against both accusers and the state.
Once your guns are taken, they are lost in the system. Once your guns are taken, the communists have control. Once you LET your guns be taken, you have WAIVED YOUR RIGHTS. We have to make these laws ACKNOWLEDGE that the SEIZURE OF ARMS is unconstitutional, but that the accused can ONLY FREELY WAIVE THEIR RIGHTS to let it happen.
OR NOT.
And if we DON’T waive our rights, then we must be granted ALL THE RIGHTS TO WHICH WE ARE ENTITLED. Otherwise known as DUE PROCESS.
Are you with me?
What I am doing is PLAYING ALONG WITH RED FLAG TO SHOVE THE POISON PILL OF DUE PROCESS DOWN ITS ERIC HOLDER CHINA DRAGON THROAT.
When we walk away with a traffic ticket, instead of being arrested, we are WAIVING OUR RIGHTS. When we pay our ticket by phone or on the internet, we are WAIVING OUR RIGHTS. And when we allow unconstitutional confiscation as a CONVENIENCE to all parties, we are WAIVING OUR RIGHTS. Everybody needs to recognize this.
Arrest in America is NOTHING LIKE arrest in China. Arrest gives us STANDING.
“I want an arress!” – speaking of our OWN arrest – may be the single most important way to STOP DEAD the communist goals of red flag laws.
What I am saying is that we need to view this BACKWARDS from the unconstitutional reasoning of the communists. We need to add an ARREST OPTION, so that red flag laws – if these horrifying things ever pass – are just as Constitutional as a traffic ticket. We need to view the immediate collection of arms without arrest as WAIVING ONE’S RIGHTS TO BOTH KEEPING THE ARMS AND ASSUMING THE RIGHTS OF THE ARRESTED.
And beyond this, THE RIGHT OF WAIVER IS THE GREATEST RIGHT OF ALL.
The right to CHOOSE to waive or not waive our rights is the ULTIMATE RIGHT. We cannot give this up, and yet most red flag laws STEAL THIS FROM US, by giving us NO OPTION to be peacefully arrested IN LIEU OF taking our guns.
The rights of the arrested – and particularly the FALSELY ARRESTED – are a GIANT HAMMER with which we can batter both RED FLAG and OUR ACCUSERS.
We must NEVER waive our rights to KEEP OUR GUNS, nor all the other rights which we are guaranteed by the Constitution.
EVER. Others may, but not this WOLF. “I WANT AN ARRESS!’
[NOTE: What I am really talking about is being “detained”, but same diff. Buckle up – it will feel every bit like an arrest. But if it’s a bad rap, you will be out QUICKLY and WITH YOUR GUNS.]
5. Red flag laws corrupt the role of the police.
This is very typical of communists. In the same way that Communists LOVE to change the ROLES and POWERS of the primary branches of the FEDERAL government, so too they love to change the roles and powers of STATE and LOCAL government.
In PORTLAND, they make the police STAND DOWN to “protect” the POLICE and not the PEOPLE.
In LOS ANGELES, they make the health department STAND DOWN to “protect” the “rights” of the homeless and not their health.
And in sanctuary cities around the nation, they make EVERYBODY stand down to protect non-citizen criminals, and not law-abiding citizens.
But conversely, communists may make police STAND UP in roles that are not actually theirs.
What communists are doing here, is making police act as “judge, jury, and executioner”, by confiscating arms before there is any proof to a DUE PROCESS that there is justification for doing so.
This is a corruption of the role of the police. This is JUST LIKE the way that communists under Obama corrupted the military and NASA, abusing their purposes instead of simply closing them down, which would be too obvious.
Worse still, this corruption leads to the NEXT problem with “red flag” laws.
4. Red flag drives a wedge between police and gun owners.
Red flag laws will not only drive a wedge between citizens and police – THEY ARE DESIGNED TO DO EXACTLY THAT.
Why? Because BOTH law enforcement AND gun owners support Trump. Because law enforcement AND gun owners typically RESPECT each other.
Red flag laws are designed to WEAKEN the bonds of respect between law enforcement and gun owners.
Red flag laws are designed to cause DIVISION between Trump supporters.
Sneaky, isn’t it?
3. Red flag laws drive a wedge between police and veterans.
Veterans will be particularly hard-hit by accusations of “unworthiness” due to the Democrat “false offering” of PTSD. Communists in the Democrat Party offered and promoted PTSD self-categorization to veterans PRECISELY so that they could eventually have their guns taken away. It was a long-term, patient plan, but it worked like crazy, and it is coming to fruition now.
I’m not saying PTSD isn’t real. Trust me. I know it’s real. But HOW that reality is integrated into society is what we are talking about. The PTSD category can be ABUSED.
MUCH propaganda has been deployed here. Watching it has been very educational.
The fact is, political leveraging of PTSD by gun-grabbing communists will create suspicions between veterans and police. Obama and Eric Holder could not be happier about this result.
And this leads to my next reason.
2. Red flag drives a wedge between doctors and patients.
Patients are already NOT being honest with their doctors about their medical status and gun ownership because of Obamacare and its sneaky socialist spying and judging. But you haven’t seen anything yet.
Under red flag laws, doctors will basically become “the enemy”. They, and their nurses and assistants, will be deprived of any information that could possibly result in a red flag complaint – once people realize that their information is not safe.
Trust me – HIPAA is BULLSHIT that is completely orthogonal to what Deep State needs to target patriots. Deep State can work around it in a heartbeat. How do I know this?
It’s DROP TIME.
I caught my doctor being used in a test run of a deep state scam against gun owners. I believe that my doctor was INNOCENT in the process – I believe they were deceived and USED. But I had some WARNING on what would happen, and was completely ready for the various steps of the process. It all happened like clockwork, exactly as predicted. It was a very beautiful scam, and will work against almost any patriot.
The key step is something that is outside of the “fake science” we are allowed to know, but that I know because of my unique background and some basic theoretical reasoning. It’s nothing “woo-woo” – it’s just been suppressed by Fake News. It’s horrifyingly real, but we were allowed to be “Eloi” for the “Morlocks”.
And the WORST PART is that this scam will sync right up with red flag laws, as I expect they are supposed to work, if we allow them to pass.
I’m not ready to go public with the details, but – well – let’s just leave it at that. I have hinted about it before, and the White Hats “have it all”. Maybe somebody else will drop the full bomb. That might cause a wee bit of scrambling, so I leave that choice to higher powers.
Fun times.
And now, the most insidious of all.
1. Red flag is designed to push Trump’s voters off social media.
This is perhaps the most profound realization I’ve had so far.
This goes straight to interfering in the 2020 election. And every election after that.
It’s bad enough that free speech is going to be stifled in real life by red flag laws. But social media? Our ONE WAY of working around the Fake News? Gun owners will FLEE.
“CHYYYNNA” knows this. They know this will kill Trump’s support online.
Which brings me to the last, EXTRA, and final reason red flag laws are a bad idea.
0. Red flag is a key part of China’s conquest of the Pacific.
By neutralizing America in the same way that they neutralized New Zealand and Australia – taking away the speech of its enemies – China will become the dominant force in the Pacific first, and the World later. Censorship of opposing viewpoints through gun laws was a way to take down opposition without firing a shot. China leveraged GUNS against SPEECH and it worked.
The question is prompted by the knowledge that a SOCIALIST, SATANIST, ANTIFA-LOVING DEMOCRAT who WANTED GUN CONTROL, shot up a bar SO THAT THERE WOULD BE GUN CONTROL.
Think about that. Read it again.
One of THEM shot up a bar so that WE will have our guns taken.
This was every bit like a political suicide bomber, doing a kamikaze run on the Bill of Rights.
What do you think will happen if we LET IT WORK?
Do you think it might happen AGAIN?
With the same results?
Take a hint from THE WOLF – this is not a sustainable situation.
Now, I ask you again.
How many innocent people will YOU let THEM kill to make YOU give up your guns?
Speaking for myself, I will let them kill as many innocent people as necessary until we realize that we are at WAR WITH SOCIALISTS, straight out of the Soviet Union and China, and that they must be PUT DOWN like the PROGRESSIVE NAZIS THEY ARE.
Peacefully if possible. But DONE. Just like World War II.
Preferably within the limits of the Geneva Convention. LEGALLY.
:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/61675987/1042095906.jpg.0.jpg)
