OK – we’re going to have some fun here – but stick with me, and you could learn A LOT.

Cue the music! Borrowed from Wheatie!

Previous posts helped put both the SPIKE PROTEIN DISEASE and the SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE into deep perspective.

We were seeing that the SOLUTION was a significant part of the PROBLEM, and that CDC was engaged in LYING, BLAME-SHIFTING, and HIDDEN AGENDAS.

And now the SCIENCE is coming out, and we were RIGHT.

We’re WINNING.

Another post discussed how – for whatever reasons are quietly embedded upon the length of the full spike protein and fragments thereof, chimeric or not – we are also now cursed with what appears to be, to some [currently socially tolerable] extent, an abortion virus and abortion vaccines.

Trust me – THAT is a trumpet that BRINGS DOWN WALLS.

We may even have a scientifically sound explanation for the craziest reports of vaccine side effects in the close but unvaccinated – namely, hormonal activities that are operating at the low microgram level.

Oxytocin – abortion dose = 10-30 IU = 16-50 mcg

---

Let me explain how that works. Think “DUST”.

I can tell you all about the potency of carfentanil. ONE BREATH of inhaled dust containing a tiny amount of it knocked me out like a roundhouse to the left jaw. If that ENTIRE DUST had been carfentanil, I would have been DEAD. But there was a fraction – a tiny fraction – of that tiny grain you see right there, that got into my lungs, riding on OTHER DUST, and I was OUT LIKE A LIGHT.

NOW you understand the POWER of the spike protein.

Yes, there is SO MUCH that they HIDE FROM US to maintain POWER OVER US.

However, now I want to put ALL of this virology technology into DEEP PERSPECTIVE.

What I am going to tell you is almost certain to shock you – both about the disease and about the vaccine. It shocked me. That’s why I figured I had to explain this to people.

And what’s even WEIRDER – this is not totally about the disease or the vaccines, but also about their CONTEXT, which forces you to SEE them both differently and more CLEARLY.

A while back, I was just browsing the “edutainment” about viruses on the internet, when I was led down an interesting rabbit hole of viruses in entomology. You know – INSECTS. I read something on Wikipedia which bothered me, so I set it aside. It all seemed FAR too familiar. It surely impacted all this crap we’re going through now – I just wasn’t sure how. Later I came back and read it again.

Now, I understand. It’s actually rather beautiful. But – well – it’s interesting.

The greatest point being – THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN.

The great irony of the idea “nothing new under the sun” is the self-referential part – the idea that EVEN this little bit of wisdom is with certainty not even attributable to its first alleged “author”, who HIMSELF surely understood the great irony of his saying it, and that others might attribute it to him, someday.

Nothing new under the sun. This bit of Solomonian passed-on wisdom about the curation rather than creation of wisdom is far truer than I realized. Let’s EXPAND just a bit.

The idea that this universe is as old as it appears to be, and that in all that time, Einstein was the first person (using the term rather broadly) to discover the logic of how speed actually works, strikes me as a violation of Solomon’s logic about “first discovery” being rare as hen’s teeth.

Likewise, Solomon’s logic goes further and tells me that “hen’s teeth” undoubtedly happened a lot more often than, when in its earthly rarity, it happened “here and almost now”, but seemingly only roughly once.

Rarity being somewhat relative, with distance providing a deceptive but effective cover for number and frequency, all of them together being a control of wisdom over knowledge.

Yet even these seeming corollaries of the idea of “nothing new under the sun” are just repeats of the idea with some frill on the edges enlightened for our benefit.

“…it is curiosity that gives meaning and savour to life.”

LIFE. Seems to be part of the design. No?

Have I BOTHERED you yet?

Maybe even a bit of trepidation – or even FEAR?

Good. THAT has happened before. “Nothing new under the sun.”

You can never go wrong with Solomon.

---

---

The Last Time Gene Therapy Was Reinvented

I keep trying to tell people – DNA is very smart. We are slowly learning how to talk to it. Sometimes we actually listen. Sometimes we even plagiarize.

DNA bargains and wheedles its way into the future, changing in whatever ways it has to, to keep itself alive. It gains as much vision of the future and the past that it can, using proteins, to persist as well as it can.

Think of it this way. DNA fights and feuds with DNA, but who wins in the end?

DNA.

NOTHING that these foolish young humans are trying to do with their coronaviruses, their “vaccines”, and their “gene therapy” is new to DNA. DNA came up with ALL of this stuff – AGAIN – at least 100 million years ago. THAT was its destiny. Ironically repeating like its own form.

I am absolutely serious. The technology of EVERY one of our wonderful new coronavirus vaccines (or “injections” or “gene therapies”, if you prefer) was RE-invented by DNA approximately 70-100 million years ago on this planet, and is still around.

ONE example of a prior reinvention of gene therapy resides in a tiny biological war-game where THREE organisms cut a deal that keeps them all alive. I will point out all of the “original versions” to you, and you will see where human science basically plagiarized.

One of the three organisms is an insect – a kind of wasp – that gravitated into using a living host for reliable reproduction. The second is a voracious plant-predatory host insect – a caterpillar – that needs a dependent predator to keep its numbers in steady balance, because it won’t do it itself. The third is a virus that found a way to survive by helping insure that the host-guest “life transfer” process always succeeded, so that it, too, would survive.

DNA uses ALL OF THEM to optimally persist.

The key to understanding all of this, is a kind of virus called a “polydnavirus”. I personally like to pronounce that “Poe-LID-na-virus”, even though that is wrong. They’re actually supposed to be called “Polly-D-N-A-virus”. My advice is pick whatever you like – you’re probably never going to have to say the word publicly – and on the internet, your canine pronunciation is always perfect.

Or just call them PDVs.

Wikipedia’s entry for them is an excellent place to start.

LINK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polydnavirus

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/YHP7V

The bottom line is very simple. The wasp lays its eggs INSIDE a caterpillar by injection. However, instead of injecting a mere venom along with the egg – a kind of chemical weapon – the wasp injects a venom containing a VIRUS – a biological weapon. The virus provides biological effects like immune suppression that HELP the wasp egg survive, hatch, and grow. This is much more efficient than merely injecting, say, immunosuppressive proteins in the venom. The immune suppression by the virus prevents immune response by caterpillar cells known as hemocytes.

All of that is shown in the following graphic.

Here is one of the first really fascinating aspects of these polydnaviruses. When they are in the wasp, they are actually PART of the wasp genome. That’s right. They’re IN THE WASP’S CHROMOSOMES. The virus is now PART of the wasp’s genetics. One could even view it as the wasp sending PART OF ITS OWN GENES into the host, to make sure that the egg survives.

When the virus is still inside the wasp, it only comes out of the genes and reproduces in one place, in FEMALE wasps, near where the eggs are formed. It doesn’t harm the wasp, because DNA is NOT stupid. Viral DNA learned – the hard way – don’t shoot the pilot. Just stay in your seat until it’s time to debark. Wasp DNA learned – the hard way – let the jihadists sleep until we get to the airport we want them to shoot up. All of it mediated through the most annoying code in the world, with zero comments and nearly inscrutable, almost accidental language.

You remember those “well, it works” phone calls, coders. “I don’t know. Try this.”

Now – the next point is even cooler – because it’s the exact same strategy as the coronavirus vaccines that use viral vectors (e.g., Johnson+Johnson, Oxford/AstraZeneca, Sputnik V).

The infection does not lead to replication of new viruses, rather it affects the caterpillar’s immune system, as the virion carries virulence genes instead of viral replication genes.^[4] They can be considered a type of viral vectors.^[5]

Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polydnavirus#Biology

The virus particles that are sent into the caterpillar are NOT reproductive – they are merely infective. They don’t code for creation of new virus, which might reproduce exponentially and kill the host or use up too many resources. Instead, the infective non-reproductive virus particles – just like the coronavirus vaccines – give a nice, predictable amount of expression of new proteins, useful for the wasp eggs and larvae to prosper. The virus basically CONSERVES caterpillar so that it has a ticket and a ride OUT of the dead caterpillar when it’s all over.

That’s the EXACT same strategy as our mRNA and DNA vaccines. Don’t crank out too much spike protein, by cranking out any new virus, and thereby kill the host. The main point is SAVING the host. The point may also be STERILIZING the host, to some extent, because THAT protein effect is beneficial to the injecting parasites known as the Democrat Party, globalist banks, and China. And probably more than one type of pencilneck. But they do want us to live – at least for some time, it would appear.

But seriously – the wasp polydnavirus immunosuppression strategy IS the human adenovirus vaccination strategy.

The only difference is what the proteins that are created DO. In the caterpillar, they suppress the immune system response to the egg or larva. In humans, the one protein stimulates antibodies to itself, and possibly does other things which are intended or not.

So you may be wondering how the virus gets from parent wasp to child wasp if the virus that is sent into the caterpillar host is not reproductive. AHA. It is because the virus is tucked into the GENOME of the baby wasp, safe and sound, for a ride into the future. The virus genome is essentially protected by the wasp.

LINK: https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-77-11-2873

Thus, you can see how genetic incorporation of the VIRUS benefits BOTH the wasp and the virus – and even – in a weird way – the caterpillar. The wasp gets to control the genetics and expression of the virus, so that they don’t cause the wasp too much trouble, but instead yield maximum benefit. The virus can then be more effective at its now exclusively delegated task of immune suppression in the caterpillar, by relinquishing reproduction to the wasp. Division of labor creates a great mutual dependency, but it also creates a strong contract.

One could say that genetic incorporation is a STRONGER CONTRACT between the virus and the wasp.

Just like genetic incorporation of COVID-19 spike protein could be a STRONGER CONTRACT of reduced human fertility.

But how does the caterpillar benefit?

The caterpillar is not going to live on as THAT particular caterpillar, but THAT particular baby caterpillar-culling wasp will live on in an assured 1:1 trade-off, and the REST of the caterpillars which benefit by the current culling will also live on as a stable population. The C-W-V balance is maintained BETTER by seeking a more stable chaotic resonance, without the wild swings of boom and bust, if wasp reproduction and population can be more closely tied to the caterpillar population, and they all live into the future without wild swings in numbers.

Another way to view it from the caterpillar perspective, is that viral efficiency minimizes the number of sacrificial caterpillars needed to keep the necessary number of wasps alive.

Now – we’ve seen viral vector vaccines analogous to the non-reproductive but infective polydnavirus virus particles – those would be the Johnson-+Johnson, AstraZeneca, and Sputnik V vaccines, which use adenoviral vectors for non-reproducing, protein-creating, virus DNA. But what about the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines?

Well, it turns out that these {{{wasps + viruses}}} invented ANOTHER way to get DNA or RNA into the caterpillar host – those are called VLP, for “virus-like particles”. There is a lot of range and variability here, just as there is in non-viral-vector vaccine technology. So in the same way that the Pfizer, Moderna and Inovio vaccines use proprietary “virus-like lipid droplet nanotechnology” to get their mRNA or DNA into human cells and thus cranking out spike protein, wasp/virus DNA can also use a strategy of “virus-like particles” that don’t even mimic non-working viruses, and STILL get their effective DNA transferred to the caterpillar, to effect the desired expression of needed wasp/virus proteins in the caterpillar.

Now – that is not to say that PDV (polydnaviruses) and VLP (virus-like particles) are the only tricks up the ovipositors of these parasitic wasps. It turns out that – in addition to these well-described DNA viruses, there are also apparently RNA viruses which ride along with wasp eggs during injection. So YES – both DNA and RNA “vaccines” are part of the wasp injections. And YES – there can be genetic incorporation in the caterpillar cells – for their short lifespan – just as there is already genetic incorporation, long-term, in the wasps.

Remember – who wins? DNA WINS. The HOUSE always wins.

But don’t forget Novavax! It may just be protein, but protein shills for DNA!

Not only are the Novavax “pseudo-viral protein-based nanoparticles” already examples of virus-like particles – they are matched by protein-based components of the wasp venom, both free-floating or otherwise. Indeed, one cannot read about the virus-like spiked particles in this wasp venom and not think that Novavax design is pretty much the same thing.

NOW – this is all a LOT to unpack. Not just that, but my “dumbing it down” probably made it just plain dumber. To correct that, I’m going to let the experts FIX THINGS UP.

The field of polydnaviruses in insects is NOT a huge field. It’s actually rather obscure, despite the phenomenal importance we are witnessing now. Just as the media can help those in power hype and control a field like climate science, or literally HIDE certain other fields like [[[ COUGH ]]], they can obscure still other fields which radically affect you, by hiding them pretty much in plain sight.

There is a BOOK that reviews the field, however, which is EXTREMELY helpful.

You can download parts of this book, and that includes TWO parts which are more than enough for a reasonably smart normal person to see the CONTEXT EXPLAINED.

Let me get ONE of those parts out of the way because you’re not going to be interested in this, unless you’re ready to get VERY nerdy on the history of science. But I am including it because it is AMAZING STUFF. You might view this as “The history of the science of the rediscovery of all the evolutionarily discovered technology used in the “vaccines” or “shots” or “gene therapy” of the coronavirus genetic injections”. It’s a beautiful window into HOW SCIENCE WORKS.

Foreword – The Discovery of Polydnaviruses and the Influence of Dr. George Salt

You can download a PDF of this at the linked page.

Now – if you read that – you will get a LOT, including a window into the slow and painful nature of research, but it’s a bit difficult to extract the good stuff if you’re not used to reading scientific review literature.

In contrast, the PREFACE of the book is MUCH easier to read, and it puts ALL this stuff in context that normal humans who are not experts in polydnaviruses can understand.

Preface – Parasitoid Viruses – Symbionts and Pathogens

I highly encourage you to read the full preface at the linked page. But what I’m going to do here is simply pull out all kinds of juicy quotes – which is damn near the whole thing. [ My comments ] and identified WOW sequences will be in bold.

Here we go – this is all quoting:

---

Among parasitoid viruses, the fascinating models of polydnaviruses (PDVs) were discovered in the 1970s and the new field of polydnavirology was thus opened.

This field has been moving very fast since the beginning of the century thanks to the use of genomic approaches and rapid expansion of accessible databases on insect and viral gene sequences.

Parasitoid and viral genomic studies have confirmed that PDVs are functionally gene transfer agents used by parasitoid wasps to manipulate the physiology of their parasitized lepidopteran hosts by introducing modified versions of their own genes into host cells.

In the case of PDVs from braconid wasps, this kind of gene therapy (detrimental for the patient, which is in this case the lepidopteran host!) originated from the integration of a virus genome in a wasp genome ca. 100 million years ago. [LOL – I just noticed this “being impressed by the date” part – looks like we BOTH realized this independently. -Wolf]

This virus has been modified to incorporate wasp genes instead of its own viral genome in the nucleocapsids inside the viral particles. [Minor beef here – ownership and original genetic penmanship on the payload could be more “virus” and less “wasp” – interesting problem.]

Such use of viruses as vectors has been selected several times independently during the evolution of parasitoid wasps. [There it is. VIRAL VECTORS. Invented by DNA.]

The PDVs associated with braconid and ichneumonid wasps (Campopleginae subfamily) are unrelated as judged from the machinery producing the particles, and they represent an example of convergent evolution with different viral origins.

A third association event is suspected to have occurred in the Banchinae subfamily of ichneumonid wasps. In essence, the parasitoids have ‘captured’ viral elements that have evolved a host regulatory role that benefits the parasitoid to facilitate successful parasitism. [This is more “archaeopteryx” on the payload being of viral origin.]

Other associations with viruses or virus-like particles might have evolved with different organisms but they have not been unraveled yet, and parasitic amoebae that have associations with mammalian viruses are just one example. [“Lots of room at the bottom.”]

Many insects have evolved associations with a large number of species of bacteria such as Wolbachia and associations with viruses have been less well studied to date compared to bacterial symbionts.

A number of different viruses are found in the genital tract of the parasitoid wasps and conceivably they could be transferred to female wasps by behavioral traits, such as host feeding, initiated following ovipositor puncture of the surface of the integument.

Host feeding may thus be an advantageous behavior for viruses which facilitates their spread within insect populations and this intimate association with viruses might have favored interactions leading in some cases to integration of viral sequences into the wasp genome, although most of the wasps described in this book are no longer host feeders.

These viruses include RNA viruses of insect parasitoids and most of them appear nonpathogenic. Could these likewise have evolved a symbiotic relationship with their host? Future research may reveal such an intimate relationship with the wasp host carrying them but, currently, we have little information about their functional role as symbionts or pathogens in the virus–wasp–insect host relationship. [This was in 2012 – the situation could be different now.]

While the study of polydnaviruses was initially inspired by the pioneering studies of George Salt and Susan Rotheram at Cambridge University, more recent studies of Venturia (formerly Nemeritis) canescens particles (the virus-like agent studied by George Salt) by Otto Schmidt and Sassan Asgari documented that these virus-like virions lack both DNA and RNA; the particles are comprised of proteins encoded by parasitoid genes. [This is basically virus-like particle nanotechnology akin to the Novavax vaccine.]

The multiplicity of different molecular forms seen in these viruses and virus-like particles is truly amazing but, compared to polydnaviruses, we have less information about the biology of virus-like particles and how they function. [There is clearly an infinitude of possibility here – clearly WHY the push for gene therapy.]

Finally, not all parasitoid species are associated with viruses and most in this category have to rely on virulence factors produced by their ovaries and venom glands instead of using the host to produce them like for PDV-encoded gene products. [Translation – most of the wasps use plain old venom.]

PDV-associated species also produce venom that was shown in some cases to synergize the effect of the virus. [Combination biological and chemical weaponry.]

New sequencing approaches are more comprehensive and will thus allow comparisons of the arsenal of proteins used in different species, which will enhance our understanding of the dynamics of evolution of parasitoid virulence strategies. [Big data will allow spying on the past to happen even faster.]

Ectoparasitic wasps have not been examined yet for the presence of viral symbionts, and appear to have exploited venoms as a source of host regulatory molecules instead. Comparative studies on paralyzing versus nonparalytic venoms are lacking, and screening ectoparasitic species for viral elements should also be a future research priority. [Translation: there’s more to learn from regular stinging / paralyzing wasps.]

In addition to enhancing our knowledge of parasitoid strategies and increasing our understanding of the importance of symbiotic relationships in species evolution, parasitoid viruses and venoms may constitute a source of new molecules to control insect pests. This might be a revolutionary outcome of research on PDVs and other parasitoid viruses, since the safety of many chemical pesticides with respect to their detrimental impacts on human health and key species in the environment such as bees and other beneficial insects, is questioned. [You think proteins are going to be safer? HA! Get ready for new problems.] We anticipate that harvesting biopesticidal molecules from parasitoid venoms will likewise prove fruitful. [Translation: All this human wasp techno coronavirus lying crap is headed to agriculture, and presumably already there. Yeah.]

Finally, we hope that this book will satisfy the reader by presenting an overview of the most recent findings on all these topics presented by an international assemblage of authors. [You can say that again!]

In addition, we aim to inspire many future researchers to choose polydnavirology or studies of other parasitoid viruses or viral-like elements and venoms as their focus field. [You’ve inspired me, even though it’s a bit late for me to enroll in one more Marxist university.]

---

That’s it.

I tell you – this whole thing was a revelation. Suddenly, everything these people in Big Pharma have been doing has been HUMBLED BY GOD, using BUGS. LOL! Pretty amazing.

And being humbled, all of us, the TRUTH now becomes clear.

Now – if all this seems a bit scary, but you’re thinking “Hey, this isn’t exactly like our case, in which Democrats mind-fracked their victims with an RNA virus” – well, HOLD YOUR BEERS. With God – IRONICALLY – all things are possible.

Yes, this, too – baffling the victim with an RNA virus – was borrowed from nature, although I am being just a wee bit facetious, since it was done much more intelligently and much more socially against a more intelligent and social species.

---

The Case of the Shanghaied Babysitter

Yeah, I’ll try to keep this one shorter, but I don’t really have to go back TOO MUCH to the original literature here.

Here is where I FOUND this case originally. An article that was COPIED onto a forum.

Parasitic wasp uses virus to control its host

LINK: https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/parasitic-wasp-uses-virus-to-control-its-host.332664/

The links back to this forum article are ALL bad, but I was able to google for correct ones. Here is the article in Discover Magazine:

Biological Warfare: Parasitic Wasp Uses A Virus To Control Its Host

Science Sushi By Christie Wilcox Feb 11, 2015 2:36 AM

LINK: https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/biological-warfare-parasitic-wasp-uses-a-virus-to-control-its-host

THAT article goes back to THIS scientific literature:

LINK: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2014.2773

This is actually a very long and complete scientific article. Let me give you the “TL;DR” version.

When the wasp lays an egg in the ladybug, it also injects an RNA virus. That virus makes the ladybug go “mask Karen” crazy, and stick around and GUARD the pupated larval wasp after it emerges from the ladybug and cocoons. The ladybug may then even kick the virus and go on living after the young wasp departs.

Yeah, let me HIGH FIVE that long-hauler ladybug.

Just sayin’.

Democrats.

SPIT.

SO – where are we now?

---

Is Phony Gene Therapy About Population Control?

We have now looked at the COVER PRESENT (coronavirus and vaccines), the EFFECTIVE PRESENT (spike protein virus and vaccines), the LIKELY DEEPER MOTIVATING PRESENT (contraceptive / abortive virus and “vaccines” that look pretty much like public “health” gene therapy), and the PURPOSED ORIGINAL HONEST PAST (infection and/or genetic modification of the injected to produce desired effects using RNA viruses and/or specialized viral vectors) – the latter insect past being a lot like what is happening now.

Are you ready for the FUTURE?

Well, there’s a lot of range on that. Maybe it’s THIS…..

---

Now I know a lot of y’all are, like me, saying “Yeah, that will be a cold day in hell!” But let’s consider it anyway. It helps to understand things.

WHY would Hillary say this, about Trump’s possible winning in 2016?

What crime could POSSIBLY send hundreds of historic conspirators to some horrible fate like what happened to the NAZIS? They would have had to have done something even more horrible – right?

Well, viewed in “holocaust” (small “h”) terms, an “abortion virus” followed by “abortion vaccines” might count.

It’s a pretty ingenious idea. If you honestly believe that overpopulation threatens the planet, and that stopping it “by any means necessary” is justified, then the idea of:

• taking a modifiable cold virus but…..
• don’t call it that, so people will be AFRAID
• warm up the FEAR CROWD with SARS, Ebola, Zika, etc.
• use a cold with its own moderate antiprogestogenic or oxytocin hormonal activity, or some other way of exerting a contraceptive or abortive activity
• optionally increase that activity
• release the virus
• create vaccines with the same effect
• require ongoing vaccines to titrate the effect on society

To me, this is very much like the wasp strategy, only instead of hijacking the juvenile butterfly with immunosuppressive negative gene therapy in a PRO-FERTILITY strategy for its own offspring, what the Democrats are doing is an ANTI-FERTILITY strategy using progestosuppressive negative gene therapy on basically all humans who are not in on the scam. And they also used an RNA virus to mess with our minds, though THAT was a bit artful, shall we say.

Now, I think the success or failure of their operation is going to depend on the ultimate level of contraception that is achieved here. The effect on society will depend on whether the Dems, globalists, and Chinese are trying to pull off a very steep and fast population drop that would generate a social immune reaction, or a long, slow, incremental one that would not. We probably won’t know this for several years.

But just consider this “back of the envelope” calculation.

Let’s say that Demmunists require 2 coronavirus boosters every year. Say that between compliance and effectiveness, ONE of those boosters is effectively pregnancy-blocking for any pregnancy currently in process. Run this over all of humanity, so that once every year, every woman is hit with a “menstruation and miscarriage vaccine” using the spike protein. With a pregnancy window of 75% of the year, that target is the broad side of a barn, as long as CDC continues to insist that it’s safe for pregnant women, or women who are trying to become pregnant. You would get massive observable menstruation and miscarriages after vaccination, and the plot would not last.

It’s not a SUSTAINABLE LIE.

BUT – as long as the effect is random, subtle, and single-digits, it can be hidden by a compliant scientific community, which is socially conditioned to reject the truth. Even bigger, control of social media, communications, and other avenues of discovering the truth, mean society can be kept completely blind to a subtle population control.

But seriously – reducing the fertility of humans by 5% is a BIG DEAL. It doesn’t mean it’s the end of it. It’s a GOOD BEGINNING – from their point of view.

You’ve got to look at this thing, like you’re trying to pull it off, to see that you really COULD pull it off.

And if we could pull it off, they will pull it off.

So – that’s where I’m at.

And if I’m right, they will NEVER FACE JUSTICE for what they’re doing.

So here is a rule about Democrats.

Democrats, China and other communists will always pick an unjust fait accompli over a just agreement.

Thus, as long as they do things where the price of tolerating their crimes is less than the cost of a civil war, they will just keep doing those things.

Something to think about.

W