Tag: Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

DEAR KAG: 20211224 – Christmas Eve – The Pub is OPEN / How Bill Gates Took Down Hydroxychloroquine

The Pub is OPEN again!

With a blend of humor and seriousness, like any good bar, we celebrate this grand re-opening of WOLF’S PUB on Christmas Eve, December 24, 2021, by actually opening near closing time on Christmas Eve Eve, but what the heck.

IT’S ALMOST CHRISTMAS.

While our beloved bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we will ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.

I will admit right off the cricket bat that this here substitute bartender doesn’t know jack shit about alcohol compared to our regular one, so he’s going to have to substitute some rather wild and crazy concoctions for the drinks, seeing as he does have some experience with ALCOHOLS OF THE WRONG KIND.

And while we’re at it, THANK GOD FOR INDIA, and another alcohol with medicinal applications!!!

Washington : Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hugs President Donald Trump as Modi departs the White House, Monday, June 26, 2017, in Washington. AP/PTI(AP6_27_2017_000035B)

Truthfully, some of the best ideas in science are to be found at local pubs, when the research groups go out and have enough beer and wine to begin saying what they REALLY think about this or that.

So WHO KNOWS what fascinating things might be said in Wolf’s Pub on a Thursday or Friday night?

But first, let’s get the RED TAPE out of the way.

VERBATIM, from the regular bartender.

HOUSE RULES

God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.

Now, back to business.

AMEN!

And TGIF!

And thus a moment of thanks to ALL our contributors, current, past, and future!

H/T DP for this one!

Current Art On The Wall

Every bar needs some art on the wall, and seeing that we’re a virtual bar with access to millions of digital counterfeit prints, you may find more than just “Dogs Playing Poker”. That said…..

A Late Nod To Hanukkah

I totally missed Hanukkah this year. I was planning on doing a post, but this year, Hanukkah fell PRECISELY during my bout with Delta, and my quarantine period afterwards, and I just blew it off.

Well, better late than never.

Indeed, I think it’s pretty cool that I was “counting the days” during my illness – with Hanukkah falling on “Day 2” – the height of my illness – and finishing on “Day 9” – completely recovered and feeling great.

I love these pictures of President Trump and FLOTUS Melania – she really looked happy at this White House Hanukkah celebration.

Nothing can take away the FOUR GREAT YEARS of the Trump Presidency. Nothing. They will live forever. And for some weird reason, the story of Hanukkah reminds me of the story of the Trump Presidency.

And THAT story is not over yet!

Vaccine Stuff

This is just an image! Don’t click it!

If you have not seen the video of President Trump with Candace Owens, then give SUNDANCE a click (below) and watch the video over there. Hat Tip to WSB for alerting me to this great video. She also has a comment over there, and HERE, too. Be sure to watch to the end! You won’t regret it.

LINK: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/23/president-trump-supports-vaccine-doesnt-support-mandates/

President Trump Supports Vaccine, Doesn’t Support Mandates

REAL NEWS

This week has seen quite a bit of WTF, one might say, with “Dear Leader” “Chidin’ Biden” wagging his Bill Clinton FINGER OF NO SLEEPY NO CREEPY at the unwashed unvaxxed, but we’ve got better things to do, than to listen to that lying old coot.

Go sniff somebody else’s hair, Fake President! #FJB!!!

How about, instead, I drink a bit too much ginger ale, and tell you all how I believe Bill Gates sabotaged hydroxychloroquine? With the aid of some people who we all know VERY well? Have a seat! It’s quite a story.

How (IMO) Bill Gates Sabotaged HCQ

You all are the first to hear this story.

Let’s start off by listening to two Steves – Bannon and Hatfill – talking REALITY about OMICRON.

The “traveling vaccine”, as Dr. Hatfill calls it. This is short – 4 minutes.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vr9ej9-dr.-hatfill-boosters-wont-protect-you-from-omnicron-its-a-traveling-vaccine.html

Now Dr. Hatfill is an interesting guy. And MORE than just how he got SET UP as a PATSY on anthrax, by THEM.

He actually knows how an alcohol called hydroxychloroquine …..

…..was deep-sixed by Rick Bright, Janet Woodcock, and Tony Fauci. Details here:

LINK: https://drstevenhatfill.com/how-a-single-point-failure-destroyed-the-national-pandemic-plan/

So this guy understands the DUPLICITY – the SABOTAGE – the DECEIT – that actually goes on in science.

That duplicity is well-represented by the recent guilty verdicts against the former Chairman of the Harvard chemistry department, Dr. Charles Lieber. You know – that guy who was helping the ChiComs with their “Thousand Talents [OF SILVER] Program”, and hiding his take from the feds.

So wait – where was I? [….looks for beer glass….]

The thing is, I discovered even MORE about how HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE was knifed in the back by the enemies of truth.

Do you all remember that GREAT video on Vitamin D in preventing COVID-19?

Well, this Doc, Roger Seheult, has ANOTHER video that I was looking at, where he talks about the vaccines. And you have to be wondering “GREAT! Is he PRO or ANTI vaccine?”

I would say that he’s definitely PRO-VAX, but not BLINDLY so. More like – the vaccine is a tool, and he’s gonna use it. He treats patients – they’re young and dying – he’s very emotional – he wants to save them – and he believes the vaccine helps. So he tells people – get the vaccine.

He’s also marginally supportive of research on ivermectin, but he’s NOT gonna buck the system by advocating current use. He does NOT seem to have very much discernment about DECEIT and CORRUPTION in science, IMO. He’s a bit of an innocent, or even a chump, just like most people in science, who think the whole thing is a zone of trust, relatively free of deception and trickery.

Here is the video.

This is actually really good stuff, but if you’re looking for ammo against vaccines, this is not it. This is more like a “good doctor” trying to convince you – with mostly good data – but in some places weak data – to take the vaccine.

I can almost see it. ALMOST. But not quite. Not for me, certainly. My “medical advisor” who says “what in the HELL happened to contraindications and the VERBOTEN status of vaccination during pregnancy?” says “NO”.

HOWEVER, if you’re looking for where the pro-vax side is WEAK and DEFENSIVE, this is also a great video. You can see where they’re in trouble, and where they’re avoiding things, and where they’re grasping at straws. It’s very edgy scientific detective work, but I read these people pretty well.

More on THAT stuff in a full post to come.

This dude doesn’t want to lose his channel. Bottom line. But you can read past some of what is said.

So first, BEFORE we get to the BIG CRIME, a small sidebar.

Sidebar: Dr. Geert is Right Again

There is a slide in Doc Rogers’ video that PROVES ONE MORE TIME that Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche is TOTALLY RIGHT.

Dr. Roger is showing this to us, to emphasize that younger and younger people are being hospitalized with COVID now – that pediatric cases are increasing, as Delta is taking over. This is part of why the DOCTORS are pushing to vaccinate kids. They’re getting more and more young adult, teen and pediatric cases in the hospitals. It’s an emotional strain on them to watch young people die.

But there is a problem.

MASS VACCINATION ITSELF IS CAUSING THIS PHENOMENON.

This is EXACTLY what Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche has been warning about. EXACTLY.

People have got to start listening to this dude.

Bill Gates’ CEO, who is advising Joe Biden, was an adjunct professor of epidemiology. Surely she can understand Geert. But she’s also on Pfizer’s board. That’s a problem. A real conflict of interest. Geert is an epidemiologist, and he is predicting all this stuff like clockwork. Maybe she should take a listen.

BUT – back to the story…..

Of the ASSHOLES who are pushing vaccination…..

By INTERFERING with science…..

By UNDERMINING science at the most basic levels.

So you see by that example – the slide of hospital age groups – what is so great about these sorts of videos is that these docs and experts will pop out the convincer graphs and references, and you can either screen capture like above, or GO TO THE SOURCE.

OR go somewhere ELSE they don’t want you to look.

So LATER in this Dr. Roger video, immediately after a rather prog-chauvinistic, hand-waving excuse why certain positive foreign studies of ivermectin should be dismissed (pure Fauci shade-throwing – go to 1:22:30), he mentions some American study – which was NOT LancetGate – that he says disproved hydroxychloroquine.

He just throws that in as an aside – but that’s BULLSHIT.

HCQ isn’t GREAT, but it works when given very early, it has saved MANY lives, and there is simply no doubt about it, at this point. So the good doctor is LOSING credibility with me right there. He’s following close, but he’s not following close enough, because he’s clearly trusting NIH, CDC, and Fauci.

BAD MOVE.

He’s a chump – and he can be fooled by flowing along with the similarly chumped mainstream of science. He’s inside the big deceit – he has no reference frame.

So what IS this study that “disproved” HCQ? Screenshot:

This thing was called the “Together COVID Trial”. And it’s still out there.

LINK: https://www.togethertrial.com/

These ad hoc COVID trials have been taking place in CANADA and BRAZIL – both of which make Suspicious Cat *immediately* purr “serious communist problems in both places” – and if you recall that French communist, Agnes Buzyn, who very stealthily took HCQ out of OTC status in France, you understand that this is significant.

Union communists and other embeds make GREAT footsoldiers. They’ve infiltrated medicine – they’ve infiltrated science – they’ve infiltrated universities, and hospitals – and they do the dirty jobs, where a spy would otherwise be required. My first exposure was in a university scandal, and that was just the beginning. I’ve had to deal with top-shelf university science commies on this very site. They tried to pull a really fast one on us, back at the beginning of COVID. They are dead serious in this big attempt to install WORLD COMMUNISM.

ANYWAY – back to the story.

At THAT point, I remembered something Bill Gates said on TV – the ONLY time he mentioned hydroxychloroquine. He said that “WE” would have to do studies on it.

As soon as I heard that, I rolled my eyes. Oh, yeah. FOX in the freakin’ hen-house.

“We have to STUDY the chickens.”

What a joke.

I have always felt that Gates was behind Surgisphere and LancetGate, the biggest hit job EVER on hydroxychloroquine, which was retracted, but I have yet to find evidence of his involvement – and I have looked several times.

HOWEVER, it turns out that Gates WAS behind the studies of hydroxychloroquine that killed people by overdoses, while giving it too late to save them.

LINK: https://oye.news/news/world-news/gates-funded-hydroxychloroquine-studies-are-designed-to-kill-people/

Yeah. That’s convenient. That combination of two crucial errors is diagnostic for a very professional scientific kill job, BTW. When you REALLY want it dead, wooden cross and silver bullet. A scientific double-tap.

See? You learn something every day.

So I’m thinking – well, maybe GATES is behind THESE STUDIES.

So then I go looking to see who is behind them, and this is what I see.

AH! So who’s that?

I went after “Rainwater” first, because I was thinking “Oh, yeah, baby – this sounds like the Tides Foundation” – that being the “charity” by which John Kerry and his rich wife send all kinds of seed money to left-wing operations.

But I check it out, and it’s just some Texan good old boy named Rainwater who left his fortune as a foundation, and at worst, the money got pointed to help Gates by some lefty kid or nephew. More likely an alumnus story or something like that.

NOPE. Not that one.

So what about “Fast Grants”?

GOLD MINE.

LINK: https://fastgrants.org/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/YQI2N

The way this org is set up, the people who choose the grant proposals get a gazillion begs, from which the operation can pick and choose. And there is nothing that can prevent a secret reach-around where the choosers or their puppets can SEND THEIR OWN PUPPET PROPOSALS INTO THE SCAM.

See how that works? Very slick.

So who funds the begs?

The grants are currently supported by: Arnold Ventures, The Audacious Project, The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, John Collison, Patrick Collison, Crankstart, Jack Dorsey, Kim and Scott Farquhar, Paul Graham, Reid Hoffman, Fiona McKean and Tobias Lütke, Yuri and Julia Milner, Elon Musk, Chris and Crystal Sacca, Schmidt Futures, and others. AWS has contributed compute credits.

OK. This is so easy, I’m gonna leave some of these names for everybody else. But this thing is so full of “usual suspects”, it should be a movie.

The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative is Facebook, which incidentally had – until right after COVID was released – a BOARD MEMBER and DIRECTOR who happened to be the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation – a lady named Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellman – who recently joined the board of Pfizer – and is also now one of Joe Biden’s presidential science advisers. I mentioned her above.

Hellman was appointed to the social media platform’s board in March 2013 and served as it Lead Independent Director from June 2015 until October 30th 2019, shortly before the first reported case of COVID-19.

https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/pfizer-board-member-is-former-facebook-director/

Yeah, that’s cozy.

Covered here previously.

The Vaccine-Powered Rona-Coaster

Is the Directed Evolution of Variants – Something Deeply Understandable to Joe Biden’s Science Advisors – Being Abused by the Corporate-Government-Academic Axis? Yeah, you remember that one! Several hat tips to Sundance on this one, too. It’s now becoming very clear that the mercenary Bill Gates getting involved with healthcare was one of the LAST …

So we have BILL GATES linked to, and MARK ZUCKERBERG and his CHICOM WIFEY funding, a study that tried to take down HCQ, and certainly seems to have influenced a lot of doctors against it.

SMART. Influence the docs, but do it quietly and behind the scenes – so there’s not so much outrage stirred up like LancetGate, which outraged the scientific community, and caused those two journal editors to squawk excuses in the “leaked” telephone conversation.

Less visibility, but more long-term effect. I really think this is why a lot of doctors “gave up” on hydroxy.

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR.

Who else is behind Fast Grants?

CHOOMER RASPUTIN – a.k.a. Jack Dorsey, of Twitter.

It’s a small world at the top of the COUP, ain’t it?

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR.

Who’s the last person on that list? It’s not who you think.

“AWS has contributed compute credits.”

AWS is Amazon Web Services. That’s the CIA. So THEY’RE handling the computers in some way. They likely had INSIGHT into all the trials.

Does this all make sense now?

Good.

Now – I have not looked at this paper yet, which knifed HCQ in the back – nor have I looked at one of the Together Trial studies of ivermectin which they also did, which found no utility.

I’m sure I will look at these papers at some point, but I’m lazy, and it’s late, and my wife wants me to go to bed.

But with these tips, I’m certain that some intrepid HONEST scientists out there will now find obvious problems with the studies. Because they’re gonna be there, trust me.

This is the state of science. It is extraordinarily manipulable. And one of the BEST ways to manipulate it, is to FUND IT, and then have access and control that is hidden from the public.

That’s life in the big city.

Bottom line – I think this is one piece of the puzzle of how hydroxychloroquine was taken down. MULTIPLE HITS by Bill Gates. The man was NOT taking any chances.

Christmas Eve

I could let this post end with a story of science corruption, but that’s not how things end. That’s never how things end.

You see – there was this guy named Jesus, and he was all about bringing GOD (or G_D, if you prefer) to the low-lifes. The tax collectors. The prostitutes. The immigrants. The wise guys. People like me. People like the people I understand. People like us. People like all of us.

There are a lot of things I could talk about, relating to the Kingdom of Heaven, and how it’s a lot closer than people realize, but what’s funny about THAT, is that it’s a lot like some of the things we run into here, in our efforts to shine the light of Truth on things.

The small stuff is easy to write off, and the big stuff is protected by unbelievability.

But nevertheless, I won’t give up, trying to get others to see the beauty of it all.

That the big party really is there.

That we’re all invited.

And that it really is ALL THAT AND A BAG OF CHIPS.

I don’t approach Christianity like most people. I use the Bible to try to understand the nature of reality. I try to understand what Christ was telling us at a weird and deep level, because I’ve found that his “thought experiments”, if you will, were always consistent on many levels of interpretation, and they help me to see – with more beauty and less words – what he meant.

I trust now for different reasons than I trusted before, but I still trust.

Anyway, Christmas is a time to reflect on Christ. And interestingly, this year, it’s really working for me.

I hope I can help you to do the same!

Merry Christmas, friends and neighbors. Posters and lurkers. Believers and skeptics. Allies and enemies.

There’s room for you all at a certain place in this town. Or very close by.

W

Making Sense of Pro-Vax Trump

Risks, Bets, Rewards and Losses – Why Vaccine-Conferred and Disease-Conferred Immunity are Both Proper Personal Gambles When Choice is Free and Enough Truth is Known or Unknown

Many of us were shocked that President Trump just showed his “pro-vax” hand in an interview with vaxx nutt Bill O’Reilly, but if you watch Trump long enough, you realize that he very often gets to the optimal perspective before anybody else – even with incomplete data.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1472987776786354177

It’s worth wondering why Trump said what he said, and said it when he said it.

Beyond the “credit” issue – which I can really see for many reasons, not the least of which is because Trump’s plan really messed up the Cabal plans on COVID – I think Trump knows people who are seeing the emerging data. And I think they are advising him correctly.

I’m going to try to show you some of that data, and what it means.

Rand Paul is a sharp guy, too. Trump respects Rand Paul. It pays to ask why. I think that part of it is because Rand is a doctor. Trump respects doctors, I am convinced. And Trump knows that doctors differ in their opinions, like everybody else, and that he (Trump) needs to listen to a number of them, to see where the best perspective resides.

Rand is not anti-vaxx. He’s pro-natural-immunity. There is a difference.

At the place where Trump’s viewpoint and Rand Paul’s viewpoint intersect, you will find much truth. I certainly did. And when I added in a few other doctors “on our side”, and looked carefully at where I was skeptical of some of their thinking, but also let them convince me to be skeptical of some of my own thinking, I hit the jackpot.

BOTH the vaccines AND the disease make sense as alternative, risky, immunity-conferring antigens. Neither one is obviously superior to the other for everybody, because the landscape of risk and benefit is too complex, and depends far too much on the needs, goals, and medical circumstances of the individual. Worse still, past choices – including accidental ones – affect future choices.

Rand Paul saw right into this – that the CRUX of the problem is that “natural immunity” is being ignored by a monetarily, scientifically, and institutionally compromised medical establishment. Natural, disease-conferred immunity is the BEST CHOICE for many people – particularly when combined with a “delay of onset” strategy, and TREATMENT, which alters the risk/benefit. We have known this all along, yet we have never truly internalized it, because the “Let’s You And Him Fight” strategy of the OBAMA MANDATES has widened and deepened the division between those who choose vaccines and those who don’t.

AND LOGIC.

Trump GETS THIS. And he said so. We ARE falling into their trap. BUT we can turn that around on a DIME.

It is critical for our side – the free and sane medicine side – to EXPOSE and BASH the performance of the vaccines, because the other side won’t do it. But it is also critical that we STAND UP for the freedom for others to take those risky vaccines voluntarily, and accept the truth that it can make sense, during a period where we don’t know everything, and MAYBE beyond that, after we know more.

Mandates are absolutely stupid, reckless, and anti-science. They interfere with medicine. The mandating commies need to BTFO. But letting fearful people take a risky vaccine – a personal gamble – is a part of freedom that we have to respect.

I want to show you data that makes this make sense.

Some of you may be surprised that I am defending the COVID vaccines AT ALL. At present I have ZERO intention of taking one. For me, and my wife, they are a BAD medical choice. For many others, too.

Well, what if I tell you that in doing so, I can defend disease-conferred immunity EVEN MORE?

What if I tell you that I can now see why, strategically, Trump waited until we “knee-capped” – but didn’t kill – the vaccines?

BOTH SIDES HAD TO SEE MORE CLEARLY.

Let me help you see more clearly.

Natural Immunity – More Risk With More Reward?

What I just said there is not always true.

For CHILDREN, it appears that the vaccines are MORE RISK, LESS REWARD.

Yeah, Trump was right about that.

It’s a NO-BRAINER to NOT, NOT, NEVER, EVER give this shit to kids, and I personally hope that God himself does whatever is needed to save children from the MONSTERS who are injecting them with these RELATIVELY dangerous vaccines.

Kids are being deprived of EXCELLENT natural immunity, for JUNK immunity that makes money for Big Pharma.

Just for starters, we may be condemning these kids to a lifetime of life-robbing spike boosters, just by virtue of a well-understood idea of “original antigenic sin”, or OAS. OAS is where one antigen leads to an inappropriate response to a later antigen, vaccine, or infection.

This means that if we give children a misleading FIRST ANTIGENIC STIMULUS, they may then be STUCK with sub-optimal antibody immunity, leaving them for an unknown time at GREATER RISK from the disease. It may very well be that the BEST FIRST ANTIGEN for SARS-CoV-2 is the DISEASE – not a spike protein vaccine.

We don’t KNOW what will happen long-term when we inject kids. Or, at least, most of us don’t. Maybe Fauci does.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Is it a good idea? Should we bet ALL our kids on that idea?

NO FREAKING WAY.

And THAT is assuming that these vaccines do nothing to affect fertility. If they DO affect fertility, then this has to be made a KNOWN and ADMITTED risk, at the very least – not covered up, like it is right now.

A call for Nuremberg II, more likely, if this was knowingly advanced.

Who wants to risk their kids’ chance of having children?

This brings up the question of whether parents have the right to *knowingly* neuter their kids. Some parents already are, by “transing” kids. I think it’s pretty clear that’s where the Cabal is going – neutering and spaying humans. Interesting question. Should it be sent to SCOFFLAW SCOTUS? How is Amy Comey Barren going to vote on that one?

Asking for a FIEND.

I would even extend that thinking to teens and young adults. There is no reason that I can see to give them the vaccine. But should they have that choice, in consultation with their doctors? Interesting question. Very hard to reconcile a pro-life position with that, isn’t it?

But back to natural immunity.

Natural Immunity – More Rewards

Are there, in fact, more rewards?

I think so. Look at these two figures from the UK Ministry of Health, showing spike protein antibodies in people in England in 2021.

LINK:

…..https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf

The darker the color, the stronger the antibodies.

The first graphs are people who have no evidence of having caught the disease (N protein negative). They include the unvaccinated uninfected and the vaccinated uninfected.

The yellow is the unvaccinated people who have not caught the disease – mostly kids.

Green, blue and purple are various levels of vaccination success – the darker, the more spike antibodies.

Now look at people who got some or all of their spike immunity by natural infection with the disease.

Assuming it’s a wash as far as the quality of the antibodies – which is not necessarily true – it’s obvious that these recoverees have a more robust spike antibody immunity – to say nothing of likely immunity to some or all of the other 20+ proteins in SARS-CoV-2.

Rand Paul, right here. The man is asking the right questions.

So why is Fauci ignoring this natural immunity stuff?

Notice that KIDS don’t mount a strong spike immunity, even though they beat down the disease in a hurry, with minimal symptoms. This is likely an EVOLVED RESPONSE – an EVOLVED STRATEGY – a form of EVOLVED INTELLIGENCE. What it says is that kids “know” by evolution – don’t build a lasting defense to the ever-changing spike protein. Meanwhile, the virus tries to “rope-a-dope” us slowly into concentrating on the spike as we age, misleading us with each attack. We lean on the crutch of spike antibodies that don’t work on the next strain, or actually make things worse.

Kinda funny that Fauci and the “follow the science” types don’t respect this signal from evolution, but whatever. That’s the basis of another post. But keep it in mind – it’s likely important.

So let us not digress.

The bottom line is that IF you’re going to make spike antibody immunity your standard of success, which Fauci and company clearly have, as part of Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis”, then by that standard, “natural immunity” from the disease gives MORE REWARD.

And again, I remind you, there are MANY other metrics of immunological success which are highly relevant, and which are ignored under Fauci spike antibody hypnosis. Always keep that in mind.

Natural Immunity – More Risks

SO – is the disease “more risk” to get that more reward?

My answer would be “maybe”.

It’s a complex calculation – particularly if you factor in “not getting the disease until you get it”. When you vaccinate, it’s a down payment in full, and with boosters, you’re even stuck with installments. You are “accepting that the risks happen” at 100%. Vaccination “collapses the probabilities”. But if you take your chances on the disease, by simply not vaccinating, you are delaying the (probably) higher risk, but the “risk over time” is substantially reduced.

Imagine the “payoff” of not vaccinating or getting the disease until Omicron. That would have been a GREAT gamble and winnings.

But let’s look at an ACTUAL COMPARATIVE RISK of vaccine vs. disease.

OXFORD STUDY SHOCKER: 1 in 100 Vaccinated Individuals Were Admitted to Hospital or Died with Arrhythmia During Study Period

Now – let me be clear from the start – this article is a CLICK-BAIT CHERRY-PICKING of the highest order. The title numbers SEEM shocking – until you dig into it, and go to the source.

But still, they’re not “lying”. It’s just misguided. But that CHAFF led me to WHEAT.

Let me include the entire, short report, as it appeared in GWP.

On December 14th, 2021, Nature Medicine released a study based on a broad population data set analyzed by researchers at Oxford University. The researchers examined the risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination and infection.

The Oxford researchers reveal that 1 in 100 or 1% of all vaccinated individuals were admitted to the hospital or died with arrhythmia or irregular heartbeat.

Of the 38,615,491 vaccinated individuals included in our study, 385,508 (1.0%) were admitted to hospital with or died from cardiac arrhythmia at any time in the study period (either before or after vaccination); 86,754 (0.2%) of these occurred in the 1-28 days after any dose of vaccine. Of those who were admitted or died 39,897 (10.3%) had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test, with 29,694 (7.7%) having a positive test before vaccination. There were 7,795 deaths with cardiac arrhythmia recorded as the cause of death (1,108 had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test).

So 1 in 100 of the vaccinated individuals are going to the hospital with irregular heart beat and this isn’t international headlines?

This is a shocking number.

James Cintolo has more on this study.

Wolf again.

This study appeared in the journal NATURE. That is the big leagues. We have to take this seriously. But let’s look at it closely. It REALLY helps to see that entire document, although SUSPICIOUS CAT should come out, just looking at the TITLE.

NATURE PAPER: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0

Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection

See? This isn’t just about the vaccines – it looks at infection, too. Is Gateway Pundit giving us the full story? Maybe not.

ABSTRACT:

Although myocarditis and pericarditis were not observed as adverse events in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine trials, there have been numerous reports of suspected cases following vaccination in the general population. We undertook a self-controlled case series study of people aged 16 or older vaccinated for COVID-19 in England between 1 December 2020 and 24 August 2021 to investigate hospital admission or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias in the 1–28 days following adenovirus (ChAdOx1, n = 20,615,911) or messenger RNA-based (BNT162b2, n = 16,993,389; mRNA-1273, n = 1,006,191) vaccines or a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive test (n = 3,028,867). We found increased risks of myocarditis associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 vaccines and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine over the 1–28 days postvaccination period, and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3), one (95% CI 0, 2) and six (95% CI 2, 8) myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively, in the 28 days following a first dose and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273. This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41) myocarditis events per 1 million patients in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We also observed increased risks of pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Similar associations were not observed with any of the COVID-19 vaccines, apart from an increased risk of arrhythmia following a second dose of mRNA-1273. Subgroup analyses by age showed the increased risk of myocarditis associated with the two mRNA vaccines was present only in those younger than 40.

The TRUTH is right in there.

First, we have to remember that GWP was concentrating on 1% of vaccinated people during the study period, INCLUDING before they got vaccinated, going to the hospital for or dying from a cardiac arrhythmia. That “before they got vaccinated” point is a TIP, right there, that we really need to consider the risk for UNVACCINATED people, too – including these very same people – for comparison. And as an aside, what is the number for corresponding unvaccinated people? You can almost guess that for most old people, it’s gonna be – well – maybe 1%?

And indeed, when the researchers compared the risk of an “event” against the risks of these patients BEFORE vaccination, they got their answers.

The WORST CASE for the vaccines was myocarditis. So let’s look at that, first.

Here is the risk from the vaccines. Broken out with [notations] so it’s easy to understand.

We found increased risks of myocarditis …

associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 [AstraZeneca] and BNT162b2 [Pfizer] vaccines

and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 [Moderna] vaccine

over the 1–28 days postvaccination period,

and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. [STRONGLY NOTE THIS!!!]

We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3),

one (95% CI 0, 2)

and six (95% CI 2, 8)

myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively,

in the 28 days following a first dose

and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million

vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273.

SO – this confirms what we know. The vaccines cause myocarditis. It’s a RISK. It’s a handful or two in a million, per injection.

But now, let’s look at the NEXT LINE.

This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41)

myocarditis events per 1 million patients

in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test.

What this says TO ME is that the risk of this one heart problem, in a vaccine that gives less immunity, is a significant fraction of the same risk from the disease.

Obviously due to the SPIKE PROTEIN, and possibly with a simple correlation to exposure.

I will admit that it’s LESS RISK from the vaccines, but not all that much.

Look at MODERNA.

The compiled risk of myocarditis from the TWO SHOTS (6+10 = 16) is 40% of the disease risk (40).

And yet HERE is how the authors have to word things to get it past the referees and editors.

“In summary, this population-based study quantifies for the first time the risk of several rare cardiac adverse events associated with three COVID-19 vaccines as well as SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in adults was associated with a small increase in the risk of myocarditis within a week of receiving the first dose of both adenovirus and mRNA vaccines, and after the second dose of both mRNA vaccines. By contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a substantial increase in the risk of hospitalization or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmia.“

They played a lot of word games there – take it from a retired scientist. They are also STUDIOUSLY AVOIDING some big stories that would rub the industry wrong.

“Give the editors what they want.”

Now, before I examine that conclusion for further trickery on the “within a week” qualifier and several other points (not today), I just want to say that calling 16 “small” and 40 “substantial” is bullshit.

Author bias, implicit or imposed, as a virtue signal to Bill Gates’ “vaccine culture” in science.

I will bet MONEY that a third Moderna booster would come in at 14 or more, bringing the total myocarditis events from chronic spike protein exposure to 30 or more, AND at the 4th injection SURPASSING the risk of ONE untreated disease incidence.

Well, is it worth it?

I don’t want Dementia Joe telling ME that it’s worth it. I want to make that determination MYSELF.

And GUESS WHAT? I will also bet money that part of the reason that CDC wanted people to mix and match boosters was to get Moderna “recoverees” boosted with the less cardiotoxic Pfizer or J+J vaccines, while not admitting that…

….defects from each spike protein vaccine are cumulative.

See how that works? Science. It’s great when you’re HONEST.

And why IS Pfizer causing fewer cardiac problems? In my opinion, it is very likely because the vaccine is distributing more widely and slowly in the body, thanks to the extreme vaccine lipid nanoparticle longevity (hence shedding) and biodistribution – data that was hidden from us, but turned up in the Japanese freedom of information request.

To me, the fact that nobody sees or talks about this stuff, is just more evidence of “vaccine hypnosis” of academia, as noted by Peter McCullough.

The reality? PICK YOUR POISON. Disease or vaccine.

If we go back to the arrhythmia example, it turns out that the “shocking 1%” actually GOES AWAY when compared to the unvaccinated. This makes sense, when you recall the very common problem of “palpitation” sending people to the ER, long before “long COVID” was a thing.

Yeah, 1% is shocking, but it’s shocking for the unvaccinated, too. Gateway Pundit was just throwing unwarranted shade.

Now, let’s take a look at some GRAPHICS from the study. Pictures tell a thousand words – not all bad for the vaccines – not all bad for “natural immunity”.

On the left axis you have the three vaccines, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna, followed by the disease.

On the bottom axis, time – repeated three times for the three diseases.

As you can see for cardiac arrhythmia (right side), the vaccines are basically fine, but the disease is problematic. This makes LOTS of sense, because the disease seems to cause many problems by nerve infiltration, secondary to vascular distribution, and those nervous system infections and inflammations are highly relevant for arrhythmias, whereas the vaccine is primarily a vascular villain, which does NOT reproduce and infiltrate.

The science makes sense here! Wonderful!

All of the vaccines have at least a little bit of myocarditis effect (left side), which is explained nicely by vascular distribution of the spike protein. Moderna, which is notorious for “disease-like symptoms” at the recipient experience level, is easily expected to have even more COVID-like spike protein effects that are not immediately obvious, such as myocarditis.

Big point – ONLY the disease (bottom side) kicks off all three diseases. THAT is what a virus can do, that a bare protein, or even a non-reproducing virus-like particle, cannot.

Everything is making sense here. Let’s look at ANOTHER view of the data.

This graph has some GREAT STUFF. The myocarditis comparison described in detail above, is the graph on the LEFT. The numbers for the vaccines look substantially less, but you can see how Moderna boosters would quickly approximate the disease, and are already like a “mild case” in terms of risks. The authors of the paper avoid talking about the cumulative risks, but it’s clear that “boosterama” is PRECISELY Fauci’s game plan, and it has problems that got solved for Moderna by mix-and-match boosters.

Fauci and Walensky. Always taking care of their companies. Yeah, I kinda get it. But you gotta be HARD-ASS with them, like Director Wolf Moon would be.

The whole vaccine thing – including a lot of other adverse effects I’ve mentioned previously but not discussed here – looks to me like a trade-off. These are NOT good vaccines. They’re actually pretty marginal. BUT for people who really don’t think they can take the disease, it could be a reasonable gamble, IMO.

There are LOTS of people who take these vaccines, and no problem. I know – I talk to them all the time. I’m the most vaccine-supportive vaccine skeptic on Earth. These people just dump everything to me, because they know I don’t judge them, but respect their decisions. I’m interested in what happened to them, and they tell me.

NADA. ZIP. The most common reaction. For those people, the shot may make sense. But there are a good number of others who get laid up hard for a day in bed, and it sounds almost as bad as COVID. I worry about them. Some – A LOT.

Now look at the second graph – myocarditis in younger people. Clearly Moderna is WAY out of whack, and the others are comparable to the disease when boosted. Again – for these people – really BAD vaccines. This is why you saw action on the vaccines. Get values up close to the disease, in terms of numerical risks, and the problem becomes an elevator pitch that everybody understands.

Pericarditis and arrhythmia? Purely a disease problem. This looks very good for the vaccine. This is what you WANT with a vaccine – to AVOID some problem of the disease. BUT – can we trust those numbers?

I think so, and I think that Gateway Pundit got burned by looking at COMMENTS on a blog post explaining the Nature study.

LINK: https://jamescintolo.substack.com/p/new-bombshell-myocarditis-study-out

This is a GREAT post – here is the conclusion:

 THE TAKEAWAY

Public health policy in the USA and UK need to change fast. As a side note, if you listen to the mainstream media enough they’ll have you believing myocarditis is a mild symptom. Let me be clear, by definition, symptoms requiring hospitalization are defined as severe. What’s more, the average mortality rate of non-fulminant myocarditis is nearly 56% which is experienced within 3-10 years. Sadly, that is a consequence of the likely heart failure that develops after the acute phase of myocarditis has resolved. See picture below 👇🏻

All things considered, it is clear that individuals under 40 are at a high risk of experiencing vaccine induced myocarditis. The good news is, there are ways to deal with this. More specifically, increasing the time between the first and second dose, not giving boosters to all healthy individuals under 40, pausing Moderna for many under 30, and seeking the guidance of other countries. All of that makes for better public health policy and positive health outcomes. To finish, I will leave you with the words of a wise man, “Health care is vital to all of us some of the time, but public health is vital to all of us all of the time”. – C. Everett Koop

Wolf again.

Now – in the comments, somebody mentioned the “1% issue”, and I suspect this is where GWP picked it up. Sadly, the comment author deleted and restated their comment, probably after realizing it had spawned a widely read article.

Here is the replacement comment, with replies.

zuFpM5*M6 hr ago I erased my previous comment. The closer I look at this study, the more it freaks me out.

They compare vaxxed to vaxxed+covid and then declare covid is worse, but they measure rates of myocarditis/pericarditis in post covid with troponin levels and in post vaxx with hospitalization rates. Hmmmm

They don’t include any control group of unvaxxed. The vaxx+covid group should be compared to unvaxx+covid to determine the actual rate of post covid heart issues. This is not done that I can tell?

The vaccinated showed a 1% hospitalization rate for cardiac arrhythmia with ~385,000 in the period up to 28 days post vaccination. I tried to look up population rates of hospitalization and found some old news articles discussing ~350,000-500,000 hospitalizations annually for ‘atrial fibrillation’ for the entire US population. So a group of vaccinated in UK blew out the entire US annual budget of arrhythmia hospitalizations in a couple month period? And that isn’t a highlighted part of the research results but instead they compare only within the vaccinated group broken out by short temporal periods? Isn’t the most important thing the vaccinated versus background normal rate?

I begin to think this whole study was gamed to get vaccinated rates of these issues versus supposed covid rates so they could continue to say vaccines are safer, when the actual #s are showing a horrific rise in these issues. It is a preemptive narrative shaping attempt.

I am not a doctor, researcher or number cruncher, so if I am misunderstanding this, I would be interested to hear how.
br143 hr ago There’s no way to sugar coat the study.

Of the ~385,000 people with arrhythmia, 10.3% had a positive Covid-19 test, and 7.7% tested positive at some point prior to vaccination.

Even if you remove 18% of the total, that’s still an awful lot of people with arrhythmia. I suppose most of us have some form of arrhythmia at some time in our lives, but how many of us are treated in hospital?
zuFpM5*M3 hr ago Yes. I would not subtract them either. I feel that there would be a covid risk increase + vaccine risk increase + covid/vaccine interaction risk increase to account for. None of which can be done without estimating the covid risk increase by comparing with non-vaccinated covid patients.

This is where they lost me. They’re just tossing out “maybes”. Nothing jumps out at me as likely to change the result. I can even add my own experience with cardiovascular issues from the disease. They’re REAL. Very unlikely that the vaccines and disease would FLIP on the relative risks of arrhythmia.

Score 1 for the vaccines.

BACK TO THE TRUMP ISSUE.

Benefits of the Vaccine Admitted by Our Side

There is a GREAT video by Geert Vanden Bossche that I keep pushing, because it is one of the clearest explanations of why “leaky mass vaccination” is a bad idea. Note that this is from a pro-vaxxer who has indeed worked with vaccines for his whole career, and is a former member of GAVI.

He just demands good vaccines, and good public vaccination policy.

Now – if you jump to around 4:30 in the video, you can hear him list the positives of the clot shot. HOWEVER, it may be better to just invest some of your time in that 4 1/2 minutes where he warms up to that point, to understand that he’s putting the positives AND the negatives in context, and looking at the bigger picture to recommend that we NOT mass-vaccinate.

He is saying that we should NOT mass-vaccinate IN SPITE OF the benefits that he lists and explains.

  • a decrease of disease in many countries
  • decline of morbidity and mortality rates
  • less illness in people who got vaccinated
  • severe disease is resisted even when vaccinees are infected with variants
  • they will shed much less virus than the unvaccinated, even when infected with variants
  • seropositivity rates are increasing in the population thanks to vaccination

But THAT is where he begins to disagree with mass vaccination. He states that we will NOT reach herd immunity, due to variants, and he explains this fully.

Global Problems of Sub-Optimal Mass Vaccination

At 28:00 minutes, Geert explains what we need to do – which is NOT what public officials are doing.

The current mass vaccination program will make things worse, in the long term. Geert explains then the kinds of vaccines we really need – vaccines which can both generate sterilizing immunity, AND which prime the immune systems of their recipients toward cellular immunity.

Yeah, it’s a bit of a tough goal, but it’s realistic toward the challenges of the China virus, and honest about what we need to do.

So what does this mean about the benefits of the vaccine?

THEY ARE REAL, BUT THEY ARE SHORT-SIGHTED. And they are accompanied by risks. Not just to the vaccinees, but to ALL OF US ON THIS PLANET.

According to Geert, continued vaccination is going to HARM vaccinees, relative to the unvaccinated, who will need to avoid virus-shedding vaccinees. At that point, recoverees may be in the best position of all, but still – not great. ALL of us will be in trouble from the virus which will escape the vaccines.

Geert also explains how we can prove that he is correct – by looking at the mutations in the virus which is shed from vaccinees, which will show selection for more infectious variants, if he is correct.

Now – this is a GREAT interview of Geert by Dana Loesch, who looks more and more like Sandra Bullock for some reason, but what the heck – the shotgun shells on her microphone setup are EXCELLENT, very non-Bullock, and she gets a FANTASTIC explanation of the problem from Geert.

Geert actually talks about Omicron, and the DANGER of it potentially evolving to be MORE SEVERE.

Take a listen!

Does Trump know this stuff? I don’t know.

I personally believe that Geert is right. I am now of the opinion that most of what we are hearing from Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, and Geert Vanden Bossche is true, but that each one has to give a little toward the ultimate truth.

What does that look like to me?

  • Natural immunity is NOT permanent or complete toward other variants
  • Natural immunity is better than the vaccines, generally speaking, but not bulletproof
  • Untreated COVID is a loser relative to the vaccines, but treated COVID is a winner
  • McCullough’s natural immunity prediction based on SARS1 may be too confident
  • Malone’s whistleblower on more shedding by vaccinees may have been wrong or disinformation
  • Geert’s vax-brag of less shedding by vaccinees may have been too kind and not skeptical enough
  • We have to stop pushing the vaccines, for the good of humanity
  • We have to allow the vaccines to continue, at an acceptably lower rate, for research
  • We have to allow vaccines to change faster, to keep up with mutations, IF and only IF this will not PUSH the virus to mutate and select faster (immune pressure must be low enough)
  • We have to pursue the superior vaccines that Geert is specifying
  • We have to use infection, treatment, and recovery as a big gun to reach herd immunity
  • We have to let COVID burn out of epidemic status, to reach a treatable endemic status
  • We cannot do that with mass vaccination, so mandates must cease promptly and completely
  • Joe Biden and CDC must be stopped – by military power if need be – if they will not end the crazy mandates

Yeah, you heard me. We can’t let this demented bozo, backed by an evil Obama and China, make COVID worse by mass vaccination. Mandates are making things worse.

Freedom, Vaccines and Morality

Trump may not understand Geert Vanden Bossche’s warning, but if we set that aside as an unknown, you can understand where Trump is coming from.

If we want freedom, we have to let other people make stupid choices that affect them most of all. Vaccination is, in fact, one of those things. Indeed, it is by US seeing it that way, that I believe we will end this nightmare of division which PUMPS UP the vaxxies and the crazy mandates.

In the same way that there are vaxxies who now are defending OUR freedom to be unvaccinated, I believe we have to defend the right of people to stupidly (or smartly) take the vaccine. However, we MUST get the rate of vaccination DOWN below the level where immune pressure from the vaccine creates more and more infectious variants.

The FIRST thing is not to take the vaccine yourself, or give it to your children.

The SECOND thing is to fight for an end to mandates.

The THIRD thing is to fight for BETTER vaccines, and to expand belief that the current vaccines are NOT GOOD ENOUGH, and are of the WRONG TYPE. Make the vaxxies demand better, not defend bad vaxxes.

The FOURTH thing is to spread the message that the “socially responsible thing to do” is to support Vanden Bossche’s position, that NOT taking the vaccine NOW is what will ultimately “save grandma”.

The last one is a hard sell, with FAKE NEWS pumping vaccine stupidity, but hey – we’ve fought tougher battles already.

So what about Trump?

Well, he is not in the position to know or respond to the “Geert Vanden Bossche Question”. Not yet. It is only when that issue becomes BURNING HOT, that Trump will be able to smartly push FORWARD from the current stupid CLOT SHOTS.

We will have to RAISE VACCINE CONSCIOUSNESS to levels of understanding that SUBVERT FAKE NEWS. We can only do that by getting most of the vaxxies on our side – to demand BETTER vaccines.

If they want to be guinea pigs – GREAT. They can be heroes, and try the deadly experimental vaccines. But we should NOT be forcing all of humanity to be part of a BAD and MISGUIDED experiment.

And the JOKERS who are allegedly running our military need to understand this. Virtue signals which kill troops, even if slowly and quietly, where nobody can see them, are NOT ACTUALLY VIRTUOUS. I appreciate them kicking out the sane ones who understand that the current bad clot shots may cripple readiness at some point, rather than forcibly injecting them. We WILL have a reserve of trained people who are not destroyed by China and Biden, no matter what China’s coming chess moves. Thank you for that. But as for everything else – there could have been push-back against communism, instead of acquiescence.

Yes, we had to be shown. But I’m not sure showing us subservience to a COUP and CHINA and FAKE NEWS isn’t undoing half of the good stuff.

But this as well. If you guys delivered Omicron on purpose, thanks. It LOOKS like it may be working.

Merry Christmas!

W

The Vaccine-Powered Rona-Coaster

Is the Directed Evolution of Variants – Something Deeply Understandable to Joe Biden’s Science Advisors – Being Abused by the Corporate-Government-Academic Axis?

Yeah, you remember that one!

Several hat tips to Sundance on this one, too.

It’s now becoming very clear that the mercenary Bill Gates getting involved with healthcare was one of the LAST things that one could reasonably expect to help it.

We were such chumps.

GRIFTERS GONNA GRIFT.

They don’t “change”. They don’t “turn over a new leaf”. They GRIFT MORE and they GRIFT BIGGER.

Two international vaccine experts can help us to see how we got into the SUSTAINABLE GRIFT of needless vaccines to endlessly mutating viruses, which Bill Gates helped engineer.

Notice that I didn’t say sustainability grift – that’s a different grift, that uses MIRAGES of process sustainability to sell the opposite.

An excellent example of the sustainability grift is wind power, which – when you count all the resource consumption and natural destruction needed to “move lots of matter around with low energy output”, wastes more energy and resources overall, than it produces – and in the long run is NOT actually “sustainable”.

Wind power uses a mirage of overall sustainability which results from hypnosis by the microscopic sustainability of just ONE STAGE in the process, to sell a totality which is not truly sustainable or even efficient. Solar power is very similar. It has its uses, but the mirage they sell is far outside of the truth.

This type of grifting uses a misleading focus on part of the truth to sell a larger untruth, which is how many science grifts work.

Perpetual motion machines are an exemplary grift, and Anthony Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis” is an exemplary misdirection.

No – a sustainable grift (which can include the sustainability grift, cutely) is a grift that maintains itself in perpetuity, provided nobody looks closely. One of the best ways to create such a grift, is to pose a general source of a problem as a solution to it, so that the central problem will NEVER be solved.

This is a form of misleading by REVERSING reality. It’s a CYCLIC grift, that creates a false solution which is really a problem source.

Black Lives Matter(TM) is precisely that kind of sustainable grift.

To solve policing problems, BLM/Soros creates more problems and mischaracterizes them so that they can’t be solved.

BLM(TM), working with Soros DAs and AGs, creates thousands of new criminals of all kinds, at the same time hindering police, in the name of mercy for criminals who are intentionally misportrayed as innocent.

If you can pull it off, this kind of misleading can create monumental, whole-of-society grifts, that in some cases can NEVER be undone.

Climate change / global warming / global freezing are all beautiful GRIFTS of that nature, joined by the principle that “together, we can all do something impossible” – even better if it’s something needless. If the workers of the scam movement get busted, they just change the story – like all criminals do.

“Government will protect you from what it cannot affect.”

Fall for that kind of scam, and you are a SLAVE FOR LIFE.

So where does this go with vaccines?

Bill Gates Takes Over Global Vaccination

Astrid Stuckelberger figured out what was happening to global public health when Bill Gates took control of it, but she figured it out too late.

I highly recommend reading this article:

https://uncanceled.news/former-who-employee-dr-astrid-stuckelberger-a-pandemic-of-lies/

Let’s just save that image for when Bill Gates’ friends finally take down that article.

Here is the relevant section:

Stuckelberger also underscored that the “WHO is not the same organization as before”. There was a change in 2016, she explained.

“It was special: Organizations such as GAVI – the Global Alliance for Vaccine Immunization led by Bill Gates – they came to WHO in 2006 with funding. Since then, the WHO has developed into a new type of international organization. GAVI gained more and more influence, and total immunity, more than the diplomats in the UN. GAVI can do exactly what they want, the police can do nothing.”

The WHO underwent an audit in 2014 and after that, it became more like a company with countries as its subsidiaries.

“When I worked with international relations in the WHO in 2013, I saw that GAVI came in more and more. GAVI presented a global action plan for vaccination 2012-2020. That is, eight years where GAVI had everything in their hands. Bill Gates handled the vaccination, he took over.”

The WHO wields enormous power over countries, she said. “Before, all countries were free. But now, when I do interviews around the world, I see that each country is part of a ‘WHO company’. WHO is no longer a democratic member organization, like the UN. The various governments form the basis of the ‘enterprise’. It logically agrees with what is happening now, since the ‘companies’ want money, business, and to control people. It’s like slavery. The taxes we pay, they go to governments that are subject to ‘the company’. Under the multinational organizations, such as GAVI.”

“GAVI, the World Bank and the WHO entered into a contract called IFFM: International Facility Finance for Immunization. Our countries, our people, pay to the WHO, the World Bank and GAVI to carry out their immunization programs. Which means vaccinating the entire population. When you see the plan from GAVI, you see that from 2012 to 2020 they have had this as a goal. But then it did not work, they had to create a pandemic.”

She said the pandemic was most certainly planned. ” You can see this from all the documents. Everyone can analyze them, they are in the open, right in front of our eyes.”

I urge you to read more – if not now, then later.

LINK: https://uncanceled.news/former-who-employee-dr-astrid-stuckelberger-a-pandemic-of-lies/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/HS15K

GAVI is only ONE of Bill Gates’ “hidden hand” organizations, by which he gets TWO TOP VOTES on any council or advisory board. GAVI allows Bill Gates to control a putative solution – vaccines.

There is another organization called CEPI – Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations – by which Bill Gates controls the PROBLEM for which VACCINES are allegedly the answer.

Note that Bill Gates is controlling both the problem and the solution – and if the solution CAUSES THE PROBLEM, then he has just achieved what he needs as the basis for a cyclic, sustainable grift.

Do you see how CEPI – about epidemics – is only pointing toward one solution – vaccines?

Subtle, but learn to be a grift-catcher, and it just jumps out at you.

Let’s take a closer look at CEPI.

Quite obviously, CEPI was all over Event 201 – although the SPONSORS were slightly different.

See how that works? SELF-DEALING. Gates is an absolute expert at it. He controls VACCINES, and he controls EPIDEMICS. The PROBLEM, and the “SOLUTION” – which, if one tells the big lie just right – can CAUSE THE PROBLEM TO LAST FOREVER.

It’s CYCLIC, and it’s SUSTAINABLE, and it’s the same GRIFT PRINCIPLE as the wrap-up smear, where one hand claims that the other hand is the “news source”.

See how the control arises? Read that bit about CEPI. “Collaboration with regulators”? What do you THINK is going to happen? Same thing. Eventually, it’s all one side, and there are no checks and balances.

Gates is such a sharp operator. SO much sharper than the chumps he fools.

But there is HOPE in THE TRUTH – and Gates’ organization DID produce a TRUTH-TELLER.

Why BAD VACCINES are Worse Than NO VACCINES and Why We Need to STOP MASS-VACCINATION

When I heard a vaccine expert – a veteran of GAVI – namely Geert Vanden Bossche – saying that vaccinating into the pandemic was a BAD IDEA, well THAT is when my ears perked up, WOLF-QUICK.

Take note of the fact that this guy IS NOT and never was the HEAD of GAVI. He was NEVER one of their top clowns. He just worked for them. The head of GAVI can NEVER say anything like this – something that doesn’t back up Bill Gates 100%.

But this guy Vanden Bossche, who worked in vaccines his whole life, including for Bill Gates’ own organization GAVI, has expert knowledge that Bill Gates is pushing the wrong solution in our current situation.

Well, THAT is interesting.

Now – listen to Vanden Bossche talk about VARIANTS and vaccinating CHILDREN, when Gates and “other organizations” (COUGH, COUGH) started pushing THAT.

Remember – this video is JUNE 1, 2021. Everything Geert said has come true with Delta, and it coming true AGAIN with Omicron, as he predicted. This guy understood directed evolution of variants from the very beginning, and how those variants are why we have to STOP VACCINATING.

There are other people – on Biden’s scientific advisory board – who also understand directed evolution of variants. The question is, what are they doing with that knowledge? Are they causing the problem? Or are they even looking at the solution? We’ll get to that later.

Also – just a warning – Geert speaks ANNOYINGLY SLOWLY – but also EXTREMELY CLEARLY.

This is a 10-minute video that takes 35 minutes to get out, but there is NO MISTAKING what he says.

So – was Geert right?

LINK: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/14/scientists-identify-young-vaccinated-people-as-source-for-omicron-variant/

Let’s bust out that tweet.

It’s behind a paywall, but this much shows through:

“Data from Denmark shows that just over 70 per cent of omicron cases have been among those younger than 40.”

If you now go back and listen to Geert, starting at around 28 minutes, and from there to the end of the video, you will see that he predicted exactly what is happening – that the disease under pressure of the bad vaccines would mutate and move into the [generally] unvaccinated younger people – AND – and this is important – that VACCINATING THEM WITH THE CURRENT SUB-OPTIMAL VACCINES IS THE EXACT WRONG THING TO DO.

Why?

BECAUSE IT WILL MAKE THINGS EVEN WORSE.

Oh.

And he explains HOW it will be worse. It could be as bad as a Marek’s disease scenario.

This is what people are NOT GETTING – that the current vaccines are NOT GOOD ENOUGH, and that they are CAUSING MORE PROBLEMS THAN THEY SOLVE.

That’s GREAT if you have a GRIFT that depends on the bad vaccines. It’s NOT SO GREAT if you’re somebody who actually cares about SOLVING problems (plural).

You know – like not making a new problem worse than the old one, and covering it up.

NOW – lo and behold – Joe Biden actually has two people advising him, on his board of science and technology advisers, who should care DEEPLY about this problem – if they actually ARE still scientists, and not pawns of industry and government.

Let’s meet them.

The Genetics and Evolution Girls Currently Advising Joe Biden

I kinda stumbled onto this story.

I was over on The National Pulse, looking at a link which ForGodandCountry gave me, when I found ANOTHER story in the sidebar.

LINK: https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/pfizer-board-member-is-former-facebook-director/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/T7tX2

Oh, the BOARDROOM INCEST gets better than that. That’s not even the beginning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sue_Desmond-Hellmann

This woman is the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Advising Joe Biden.

FTA:

Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellmann – a member of Pfizer Inc.’s Board of Directors – previously served as the Lead Independent Director at social media giant Facebook. The site has routinely censored posts relating to COVID-19 vaccines, with Pfizer in particular eliciting support from major corporate outlets.

Hellman was appointed to the social media platform’s board in March 2013 and served as it Lead Independent Director from June 2015 until October 30th 2019, shortly before the first reported case of COVID-19.

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook founder and CEO, said “Sue has been a wonderful and thoughtful voice on the board for six years, and I’m personally grateful to her for everything she has done for this company” in response to her departure.

“I remain positive about Facebook and the mission to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. Facebook’s Shareholders require a Board of Directors that is fully engaged and committed to address the critical issues confronting Facebook at this time,” Hellmann explained in reference to her role as the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

“Unfortunately, increasing demands from my CEO role, my extended family, and my own health make it no longer possible for me to commit the necessary time and energy required to properly serve Facebook and its shareholders,” she added in a public statement despite joining Pfizers board in 2020.

Amidst Hellmann’s tenure on the Pfizer board, Facebook has initiated campaigns to censor COVID-19 vaccine skeptics, as leaked internal documents from the company reveal algorithms aimed at “drastically reduc[ing] user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments.”

And much more.

Here is SOME of what I said to FG&C:

She links, at the highest levels:

Facebook
Pfizer
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Genentech
U.C. San. Fran.
U.C. Berkeley
AIDS research in Uganda
Rockefeller Foundation
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Federal Reserve Bank of San Fran
Global Health 2030

She’s behind a data initiative that basically reports individual patient data back to researchers to “accelerate research and learning blah-blah-blah”.

From Wikipedia:

Precision medicine based on Google Maps

In 2011, Desmond-Hellmann co-chaired a National Academy of Sciences committee that recommended creating a Google Maps-like data network aimed at developing more diagnostics and treatments tailored to individual patients — a concept known as “precision medicine”.[12] The so-called “knowledge network” would integrate the wealth of data emerging on the molecular basis of disease with information on environmental factors and patients’ electronic medical records and would allow scientists to share emerging research findings faster, thereby accelerating the development of tailored treatments. It also would allow clinicians to make more informed decisions about treatments, reduce health care costs and ultimately improve care.[13] The NAS report, titled “Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease”, was described by Keith Yamamoto, Vice Chancellor for Research at UCSF, as “the most important National Academy of Sciences Framework Analysis since that advisory body recommended that the United States go forward with the Human Genome Project”.[14]

In 2021, Desmond-Hellmann was appointed by President Joe Biden to the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), co-chaired by Frances Arnold, Eric Lander and Maria Zuber.

So – as a SIDEBAR – this woman was involved in the “freeing up” of electronic medical information which has basically DESTROYED medical privacy.

Which was GREAT for Democrat trial lawyers, by the way. Just today I got a call from AMBULANCE CHASERS based on a “confidential” diagnosis (nothing bad – don’t worry) that just went into my electronic records a few weeks ago.

I was SHOCKED that these people came on to me. It’s like Obamacare knifing my doctor in the back. The only way they knew, was access to my medical records. It should be absolutely illegal as hell for anybody – much less Democrat ambulance chasers – to know about that rare diagnosis and actually cold-call me to try to stir up a case. But yeah – destroying medical privacy in the name of helping researchers like her – that is just one example – a small example – of how “Inception” by the bad guys works. Find a smart dupe and get them to pimp an idea you need. Maybe even make them THINK they thought of it.

Free up the data with the EXCUSE of the good guys getting it, so that the BAD GUYS can do all kinds of things with it.

I know all about this – about being used as a PROXY to advance an idea because that proxy has respect as a scientist. It’s a nasty game.

Anyway….. [end of sidebar]

I am NOT of the opinion that this woman is as bad as someone like – say – Bill Gates. But I AM of the opinion that she’s very likely a politically correct “reliable board skirt” who always votes the way people are SUPPOSED to vote on board decisions. She’s Bilderberg fodder. She’s SMART and she GETS IT DONE. But she always does the “right thing” – the expected thing – the thing that somebody with more power and more control wants done.

So THIS woman is NEVER going to tell Joe Biden what Bill Gates doesn’t want him to hear.

But if there is any wonder why Joe Biden keeps trying to mandate vaccines, yeah, it’s because one of his science advisors is the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Pretty convenient.

Now – let’s move on to the other gal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Arnold

THIS ONE will not only understand what Geert Vanden Bossche is saying – she may actually respect that wisdom.

Frances Hamilton Arnold (born July 25, 1956)[1] is an American chemical engineer and Nobel Laureate. She is the Linus Pauling Professor of Chemical Engineering, Bioengineering and Biochemistry at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech). In 2018, she was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for pioneering the use of directed evolution to engineer enzymes.[2]

Since January 2021, she serves as an external co-chair of President Joe Biden‘s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST).[3]

So – THREE important points about Frances Arnold:

  • Pioneered the use of “pushed” evolution of organisms in the lab to make them useful
  • Nobel Prize winner
  • co-chair of Joe Biden’s “board” of science and technology advisors

So what’s up with this “directed evolution”?

From Wikipedia…..

Arnold is credited with pioneering the use of directed evolution to create enzymes (biochemical molecules—often proteins—that catalyze, or speed up, chemical reactions) with improved and/or novel functions.[25] The directed evolution strategy involves iterative rounds of mutagenesis and screening for proteins with improved functions and it has been used to create useful biological systems, including enzymes, metabolic pathways, genetic regulatory circuits, and organisms. In nature, evolution by natural selection can lead to proteins (including enzymes) well-suited to carry out biological tasks, but natural selection can only act on existing sequence variations (mutations) and typically occurs over long time periods.[26] Arnold speeds up the process by introducing mutations in the underlying sequences of proteins; she then tests these mutations’ effects. If a mutation improves the proteins’ function she can keep iterating the process to optimize it further. This strategy has broad implications because it can be used to design proteins for a wide variety of applications.[27] For example, she has used directed evolution to design enzymes that can be used to produce renewable fuels and pharmaceutical compounds with less harm to the environment.[25]

One advantage of directed evolution is that the mutations do not have to be completely random; instead, they can be random enough to discover unexplored potential, but not so random as to be inefficient. The number of possible mutation combinations is astronomical, but instead of just randomly trying to test as many as possible, she integrates her knowledge of biochemistry to narrow down the options, focusing on introducing mutations in areas of the protein that are likely to have the most positive effect on activity and avoiding areas in which mutations would likely be, at best, neutral and at worst, detrimental (such as disrupting proper protein folding).[25]

So – there you have it – “mutagenesis and screening“. In a way, it’s still just breeding horses or labradoodles, but much more technical and scientific.

If you suddenly think that, “Hey, this sounds a lot like what Fauci, Baric, Daszak and Bat Lady were doing” – you know – gain of function – well, that’s precisely it.

And think about this.

The SPIKE PROTEIN is a protein just like an ENZYME is protein. The only difference there, is that FAUCI and his gang were controlling the “directed evolution” of viruses making proteins toward whatever goals THEY thought useful, whereas Arnold was controlling the “directed evolution” of bacteria making proteins toward whatever goals SHE thought useful.

I remember when Arnold’s work was frequently showcased in Chemical & Engineering News. Yeah, a lot of it was feminist championing of a woman scientist by the C&EN media leftoids – BUT the fact is that Arnold’s work was very interesting stuff, and her interests and abilities always struck me as authentic – that she was NOT a “manufactured” science celebrity. She was showcased more than created.

One can argue about whether she deserved to be Beast-marked by the Dynamite Prize or not. Doesn’t really matter. To borrow from Trump, “Knowledge is the prize.”

In principle, this lady is capable of understanding and RESPECTING Geert Vanden Bossche’s arguments. If she’s going to disagree with him HONESTLY, then it will be for good reasons.

But that’s not the end of the story.

Let’s talk mutagenesis.

Remdesivir and Molnupiravir as Mutagens

Now I’m not saying that ALL of these new COVID drugs are human mutagens or teratogens. In fact, most likely, NONE of them are. The Pfizer drug is not a mutagen as far as I know – but then that drug is actually a binary drug, and one of THOSE two drugs is an established AIDS drug, which is quite fishy in light of VAIDS.

What I am saying is that TWO of these drugs are PROVEN viral mutagens.

Sorta like that critical step in Frances Arnold’s work.

So are we trying to ACCELERATE the appearance of variants? Are we consciously trying to CHANGE how or how fast they vary? Is SOMEBODY consciously trying to change how or how fast they vary?

Here is where I talked about the apparent public health contradiction of using drugs like molnupiravir and remdesivir on a virus which mutates into “variants of concern” before:

The Molnupiravir Contradiction

Why would we mass treat a virus with a drug which forces the virus to mutate, when mutation is how the virus creates new variants that reinfect the vaccinated? Before I explain the title contradiction, let me start with an admission. Most of my life, I have been very friendly with the pharmaceutical industry. I …

In that blog post, I explained that (1) remdesivir has been PROVEN to “push” SARS-CoV-2 toward evolution of variants, including “variants of concern”, and (2) molnupiravir works on the principle of “mutation catastrophe” in the SARS-CoV-2 reproductive process, so it likely does the same thing even more.

So are we “doing the Arnold” or what?

I will leave that up to others to answer.

Let me close instead with one more great article which summarizes where we are.

It’s Vanden Bossche without Vanden Bossche.

Eugyppius & The Conservation of Corona

If you have not found this anonymous German dude’s substack account, you need to be watching it. It’s almost better than Alex Berenson’s account, which is a pretty hard thing to do.

Among several great posts, this one is critical.

Let me just quote the first few paragraphs.

FTA:

The ascendancy of more transmissible (and possibly also more pathogenic) Delta strains is a consequence of the worldwide vaccination campaign. This is now the most salient and the most important side-effect of our vaccines. They elicit antibodies that select for more aggressive SARS-2 lineages, which escape vaccine-induced immunity by replicating in the lungs of infected people faster and earlier.

All our evidence is that the alpha (Kent) and delta (Indian) lineages emerged at the same time, in September or October 2020. Delta was more aggressive than alpha, but alpha had the upper hand until vaccines killed it off. Probably, Delta is too aggressive in completely unvaccinated populations, causing severe illness before very many of its hosts can do much spreading.

Consider the entirely typical case of my country, Germany. Most first doses here were administered over the course of nine weeks, from early April to early July. In precisely this period, Delta began its rise to absolute dominance. The genetic diversity of SARS-2 has been totally destroyed in Germany and everywhere else too.

What you see happening to Alpha in this chart, is what the vaccines were supposed to do to Corona as a whole. But then it was Corona’s move, and Delta is the hand it played.

Nothing about how the pandemic plays out now can be disentangled from the vaccines. The more aggressive spread of Delta among the unvaccinated is as much a part of this campaign, as its continued spread among the vaccinated. We have totally changed the environment in which SARS-2 circulates, and in response SARS-2 has become more transmissible and more volatile across the board.

MORE: https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/the-conservation-of-corona

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/vhrEk

SO – have I convinced you of the obvious? I’m convinced.

DA RONA-COASTA IS POWAHED BY DA VAXX.

It’s bloody obvious.

So are they incompetent or evil? Or maybe both?

Your call. I’m just watching from the cheap seats.

And getting ready for the Biden Depression.

Cheers, Eugyppius and Geert. You guys get da Woof Prize.

W

The Molnupiravir Contradiction

Why would we mass treat a virus with a drug which forces the virus to mutate, when mutation is how the virus creates new variants that reinfect the vaccinated?

Before I explain the title contradiction, let me start with an admission.

Most of my life, I have been very friendly with the pharmaceutical industry. I have eloquently defended Big Pharma, the FDA, “government and corporate medical science”, and all those things that the Biden administration so earnestly defends now.

I even got an award sponsored by one of those Big Pharma companies – which is not to say much, because they give out a LOT of them. In fact, the grooming of young scientists to revere Big Pharma, is no different from the grooming of doctors (and now medical bureaucrats, who know less “talk-back” science) to promote and prescribe their products.

If you go back and look through my posts here, you will see that my thinking about Big Pharma has only evolved slowly from starry-eyed hope and blissful faith. I was quite earnest in my wishes that some of their new products might be better than doctor-discovered, repurposed, off-label drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

What I would NOT do, was deny the obvious effectiveness of those cheap, plentiful, and SAFE doctor-discovered drugs.

If the world was against HCQ, then “Lupus contra mundum” (Wolf against the world).

Why so? Because the DATA on these two drugs killing virus and preventing death was so alarmingly GOOD. You just have to be HONEST and INDEPENDENT to see it. Then, you just ask WHY. And the answers came.

It was BEAUTIFUL. It was SCIENCE.

Even when it was ugly. Like the Lancetgate Effect.

I’m a DATA GUY. I know WHICH data matters and WHICH data doesn’t. I can SEE THROUGH CURVES like a horny guy next to a woman in bed in the dark, seeing her under the sheets. With DATA, I can see through walls. I can see around corners. I have escaped death many times by seeing what nobody else saw.

It’s a gift from GOD, and I don’t waste it.

I really WANTED remdesivir to work, but then I saw the numbers. I could not unsee them. I was forced to admit that the drug DID not work, and COULD not work, in large part because it was being administered too late.

Antivirals work best EARLY, when they have an overwhelming numerical advantage – which is very hard to obtain over an EXPONENTIAL ENEMY. But if you administer early, even ATYPICAL antivirals like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, in proper ANTIVIRAL doses, have a chance.

Remdesivir is fairly toxic stuff, and when administered too late, when the virus is long gone, it kills its victims in a way surprisingly similar to what late-stage COVID does, by kidney failure, and then pulmonary dysfunction which looks like pneumonia. So if you administer remdesivir to dying COVID patients, it may not do THEM any good, but it will make YOU a whole lot of money on their deaths, which are thus ENSURED. And YOU won’t get caught doing it, because it all looks like COVID.

SLICK.

And WE have covered remdesivir before.

Remdesivir Is How We Bring Down The Temple of Faucism

NIH and Gilead Blamecasting Remdesivir Renal Toxicity to an Excipient

OAN Hosts Amazing Anonymous Documentary on Discovery and Suppression of Ivermectin for COVID, and How Gilead and Fauci Gamed a Remdesivir Study

And last but not least:

The Murder of Veronica Wolski by Fauci and Gilead’s Zyklon D

There will be justice for Veronica Wolski, because we will DEMAND IT. And until there IS justice, we will drag the CRIMES of Anthony Fauci and Gilead “Pharmaceuticals” and their SLEAZY ASSOCIATES thorough the headlines, over and over, until people SPIT IN THEIR PATH as they walk down the streets. So where do we begin? …

Remdesivir goes really well with murderous vents and no prior therapeutics, and NO, NO, NO ivermectin allowed, which – DO TELL – is exactly how the Stalinist Biden-Obama-Harris administration and its CHINAZI allies kill off us pesky American seniors.

But that’s getting a little ahead of things. We’ll come back to remdesivir.

First – molnupiravir.

Molnupiravir was once called EIDD-2801, back when it was more of a hope and a dream.

I had high hopes for molnupiravir back then. I had hoped it would be a significantly better antiviral than hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, both of which are antiparasitics first, and antivirals second – and at that, only by a bit of luck. But that LUCK can SAVE YOUR LIFE.

That was back when I didn’t realize how diabolical the people who CONTROL Big Pharma really are – that they would SHIT on a lucky, life-saving break, just for money.

As it turns out, molnupiravir is roughly as good as the cheaper drugs, but definitely not as safe.

Nevertheless, molnupiravir is NEW, it’s PATENTABLE, and it’s a MONEYMAKER. The system is RIGGED, and thus we are DENIED the cheaper, safer drugs, so that our money will fund expensive drug research.

Whatever. That is just the way things are. I didn’t know that, when I was a student. I didn’t realize that the system was actually corrupt. Although the system probably wasn’t as bad back then, either.

Chinese communist ethics have filtered into America, and they have not done Big Pharma any good.

Would I take molnupiravir? Maybe. If I had to pick ONE, it would probably be ivermectin. Second choice, hydroxychloroquine. Third, molnupiravir. I don’t think I would take remdesivir next – I’d probably try acyclovir. That stuff really WORKED for my shingles – TWICE. It might not work on a coronavirus, but at least it wouldn’t kill my kidneys.

Now that you know how I feel about the drugs, let’s talk about WHY I feel that way. But in a roundabout and very telling manner.

Here is a synthesis of molnupiravir from cytidine – the molecule that it mimics in order to kill RNA viruses, including SARS-CoV-2.

If you look at the molecular structure of molnupiravir above, on the right, you will see two rings. The pentagonal ring with an “O” (oxygen) is a SUGAR ring, and the hexagonal ring with two “N” (nitrogen) atoms is a BASE ring.

Together, those two rings are ALMOST a nucleoside – a component of RNA – called cytidine, shown above on the LEFT, or below.

The only real differences between molnupiravir and cytidine, as shown, are the tail on the left of molnupiravir, hanging off the left-hand O group (and which really only helps the delivery of the drug), and more importantly, that extra “OH” group, hanging off the right-hand NH group of the molnupiravir molecule, in the diagram above.

Add that OH group to cytidine, and you have N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC) – the “real” drug being administered, also known as EIDD-1931. Add that little ester tail on the left, to make a nice orally active and bioavailable “prodrug” of NHC, and you have molnupiravir, or EIDD-2801.

That OH group totally screws things up. It’s absolutely AMAZING what that does to the genetic machinery of the virus, inside YOU.

FAKE cytidine, like FAKE NEWS, kills.

There is a great but still fairly technical explanation of how molnupiravir works that was published in Nature, called “Molnupiravir: Coding for Catastrophe“. You can download a PDF of the article HERE.

The abstract is very useful:

Molnupiravir, a wide-spectrum antiviral that is currently in phase 2/3 clinical trials for the treatment of COVID-19, is proposed to inhibit viral replication by a mechanism known as ‘lethal mutagenesis’. Two recently published studies reveal the biochemical and structural bases of how molnupiravir disrupts the fidelity of SARS-CoV-2 genome replication and prevents viral propagation by fostering error accumulation in a process referred to as ‘error catastrophe’.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41594-021-00657-8

I used part of one graphic from the paper for the feature image of this article. That graphic shows crude, flattened structures of both molnupiravir, and the fully phosphorylated fake nucleotide that gets incorporated into the virus RNA, which is called molnupiravir triphosphate, or MTP.

Technically, it’s really not molnupiravir any more, after that prodrug ester gets replaced by a triphosphate unit – it should really be called N4-hydroxycytidine triphosphate. But that pickiness is confusing – MTP is still very true in spirit, and that’s FINE with us big picture types.

Now – THIS is where it all happens. This is where THINGS GO WRONG, and the drug starts to work.

That OH group hanging off the NH of molnupiravir CHANGES the nature of the nitrogen atom to which it is attached, and in a BIG way. Suddenly, the little hydrogen atom that is attached to that nitrogen, would almost rather be located on the OTHER nitrogen in the ring, instead of staying where it is, on the sideshain nitrogen, next to OH. In fact, that hydrogen atom almost stops caring which place it stays. This is a phenomenon called tautomerism. It’s a molecule that can exist in two forms.

One little proton. It’s now happy either way.

But RNA? It ain’t happy.

So what happens, is MTP goes into RNA where CTP should go. And once M is in there where C should be, M can’t make up its mind where that little proton should go. If the machinery sees M with the hydrogen where C would keep it, the machinery does the right thing, and M just gets treated like C. No mutation. But if the hydrogen is in the other place, the machinery thinks M is actually U, and a mutation occurs.

You can see that in this next diagram, where the “hydroxylamine” (-NHOH) form binds correctly with GTP, but the “oxime” form (=NOH) binds INCORRECTLY with ATP.

In the next graphic, you can see how M gets incorporated for C, and starts to cause problems by leading to U instead of C. The events shown in the graphic follow a sequence I’ll try to describe.

If you can’t follow it, don’t worry. This stuff is always confusing when you track the changes.

Starting from the top, below……

  • one ringer M is already present (top strand), while M competes with C to match the next G (two choices shown waiting)
  • the second ringer M goes in on the bottom strand, to match the G, where C should have gone
  • the second ringer M (now on top, follow UACGM from left) is then matched with a new A (WRONG) on the bottom, instead of a G (two choices shown). You can also see (and this is very complicated) that the first ringer M was matched with a G (now shown on top), and that G has already matched up to ANOTHER (third) ringer M, now on the bottom strand in the third subgraphic.
  • the strand with incorrect A (follow UMAA from right to left on bottom, now on TOP, right to left) is then matched with a U on the second A, completing the screw-up from C to U
  • the net effect, bottom strand, is that UACG[C] (top of diagram, what should have happened) became UACG[U] (bottom of diagram, what did happen)

One can look at this whole process as N4-Hydroxycytidine (M) cutting in line where C was supposed to go, and then handing things off to the WRONG base, so that C gets replaced by U.

Complicated, isn’t it? But THAT is how mutations are PROMOTED by this drug, and they are KEY to how it works. There is an AVALANCHE of mutations that kills the virus. The whole idea is that the DRUG makes the virus mutate too much, too fast, into non-viable forms, and it just dies – or at least enough for your immune system to take over and WIN the fight. The virus CRASHES because of the drug. Meanwhile, the body mounts a defense.

You can read the rest of the article if you want, and get some sense of the complexity of considerations as to whether this makes a good drug or not for the individual.

There IS a legitimate question of whether screwing up the RNA of the virus, might also lead to screw ups in the host – either in RNA or DNA, leading to things like birth defects, cancer, adverse events during therapy, etc.

That concern is nicely summarized in a Zero Hedge article:

“Proceed With Caution At Your Own Peril” – Merck’s COVID ‘Super Drug’ Poses Serious Health Risks, Scientists Warn

BY TYLER DURDEN

SATURDAY, OCT 09, 2021 – 05:22 AM

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/proceed-caution-your-own-peril-mercks-covid-super-drug-poses-serious-health-risks

Now, I’m not really interested – for the purposes of this article – in the question of whether or not there are INDIVIDUAL dangers posed by molnupiravir, due to either mutations of the host, OR the forcing of mutation of the virus in that host.

There are excellent reasons to believe, that just like vaccines don’t really pose INDIVIDUAL risks through mutation of the virus in any particular victim, there is no significant individual risk from mutations of the virus due to a mutagenic drug.

HOWEVER, that’s not my concern.

My concern is related to Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche’s concern about mass vaccination during a pandemic. He differentiates between the idea of a vaccine being good for an individual, and that vaccine being good public policy for humanity as a whole, ultimately including that individual.

Geert’s concern is that a virus AS A WHOLE – as a global population – as almost an ecosystem – will evolve due to pressure from a non-sterilizing vaccine, to create new strains that will resist the vaccine. Thus, while the vaccine may benefit an individual in the short term, it ultimately does NOT benefit the sum of all individuals, who will ALL suffer from the mutated virus, which would not have happened, absent the specific evolutionary pressure of the vaccine.

If Geert is right, it’s not just stupid to “vaccinate ourselves into trouble” – it’s downright EVIL.

We have already seen Geert’s prediction apparently (wait for it) fulfilled with the delta strain of SARS-CoV-2, which basically ignores vaccines against “wild type” Wuhan coronavirus.

But again, that is not STRICTLY my concern.

Then what IS my concern?

Original predictions, based on the mutation of the original Wuhan coronavirus, were that the virus was genetically contained – that it was not mutating into significantly different forms requiring changes in the vaccine. And yet, something seems to have CHANGED that. The early predictions could have been WRONG, but they could also have been UNDERMINED. And they could have been undermined by the same terrible logic of “we have to pass it to see what’s in it”, or “we have to try to MAKE the virus catch in human cells, to see if it CAN catch in human cells”.

You see what I mean? There could be “dishonest science” and other such “skulduggery” here, just like we have seen with LIARS like Fauci, Baric, Tedros, and China.

My concern is that in Geert Vanden Bossche’s scenario, which I have described as “coronavirus variant whack-a-mole”, it will only be made WORSE by drugs which encourage the mutation of the virus.

In other words, mass vaccination into a pandemic with “leaky” vaccines is bad, but to do so while chemically promoting the mutation of the virus is even worse.

Thus, not only is it CONTRADICTORY to vaccinate in such a scenario – it is EVEN MORE contradictory to promote mutation in such a scenario.

And – worse than THAT – it appears that we have ALREADY BEEN DOING IT – with remdesivir.

Remdesivir is notable as being an antiviral which is generally being given to patients, with no hope of it actually working, long after the SARS-CoV-2 virus has done its dirty work, and those patients are ACTUALLY dying of a cytokine storm. These patients may still be producing and shedding some virus, but the sum of all studies is rather definitive at this point – remdesivir does little except LENGTHEN the stay of patients in the hospital.

Well, what are those patients doing there, staying too long in the hospital?

One strong possibility is that these dying patients are creating mutants and variants. The following paper shows what happens to SARS-CoV-2 virus when confronted in vitro with remdesivir – and it is basically what I am predicting will happen with molnupiravir.

In vitro evolution of Remdesivir resistance reveals genome plasticity of SARS-CoV-2

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.01.429199v1.full

ABSTRACT

Remdesivir (RDV) is used widely for COVID-19 patients despite varying results in recent clinical trials. Here, we show how serially passaging SARS-CoV-2 in vitro in the presence of RDV selected for drug-resistant viral populations. We determined that the E802D mutation in the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase was sufficient to confer decreased RDV sensitivity without affecting viral fitness. Analysis of more than 200,000 sequences of globally circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants show no evidence of widespread transmission of RDV-resistant mutants. Surprisingly, we also observed changes in the Spike (i.e., H69 E484, N501, H655) corresponding to mutations identified in emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants indicating that they can arise in vitro in the absence of immune selection. This study illustrates SARS-CoV-2 genome plasticity and offers new perspectives on surveillance of viral variants.

Now this is moderately straightforward, but the big picture is not apparent, because the authors know they are playing with dynamite, so I’m going to restate what they found in more direct language.

Bottom line up front, they basically found evidence that remdesivir does exactly what I’m thinking molnupiravir will do – which is to promote mutation per se, including into “variants of concern”, independently of drug resistance evolutionary considerations, which makes tons of sense.

A mutagenic drug (or rather a drug which works on the principle of mutagenesis) creates mutations with high frequency on a large scale, without the need for evolution to strongly amplify rare beneficial mutations. But at the same time we don’t see – in the wild – any evolution of resistance to remdesivir (RDV). The paper spells this out.

So let’s look at what the study found:

“in vitro with omnipresent RDV” – we see both appearance of variants of concern AND resistance to RDV

“in vivo with late-stage RDV” – we see appearance of variants of concern but NO resistance to RDV

[ The second is a bit of a joke – I’m talking about what we see in the wild globally – no RDV resistance. ]

How can this be rationalized?

In the in vitro case, resistance to RDV is a NECESSITY forced upon the virus. All mutations must persist under omnipresent high concentrations of RDV, so this is a pressure that cannot be worked around or escaped from. Yes, RDV benefits the virus by assisting mutation, despite doing it “too much”, which forces resistance to occur. And what IS the resistance? It is for the virus to continue propagating, both unhindered by RDV yet also assisted by RDV. So, essentially, SARS-CoV-2 and RDV negotiate to the point where the “benefits” of RDV to speed up mutation don’t diminish the viability of the virus. The virus learns to USE the ringer nucleoside M to mutate faster, without dying from it. Thus, we see evolution of traits that have benefited SARS-CoV-2 in the wild, plus evolution of a trait of adaptation to RDV.

In the in vivo case, in a Petri dish called “planet Earth”, resistance to RDV is NOT a necessity. The virus has plenty of hosts who are not using it, so it negotiates more strongly to a better deal. It takes all the mutations it can get from RDV, but it does NOT accept the need to mutate to adapt to RDV. THAT particular mutation is unnecessary for most of the virus, so it is not forced to cut that deal.

Bottom line question: Does RDV in the wild speed up mutation?

My answer: I would bet money on it. It appears to do so in the lab.

And if I’m right, enhancement of mutation should happen even more strongly for molnupiravir, which has a more clearly mutagenic mechanism of action than remdesivir.

The authors simply refer to the plasticity of the VIRUS, because woe unto them if they talked about a Big Pharma drug being a promoter of viral plasticity-COUGH-mutation. But that is exactly what the in vitro results mean here. They were able to generate the “variants of concern” in the lab, using exposure to remdesivir.

They went looking for mutations for resistance to remdesivir, and they not only found one of those – they found MORE mutations, including ones matching “variants of concern”.

WHY?

Well, let’s go back to the original point:

Why would we mass treat a virus with a drug which forces the virus to mutate, when mutation is how the virus creates new variants that reinfect the vaccinated?

In my opinion, it is REASONABLE to expect that any drug which operates as a “ringer” nucleoside – as BOTH remdesivir AND molnupiravir do – is going to cause SOME level of genetic errors – a.k.a. mutations – as a consequence. You can dress up pro and con arguments in fancy language, but scientific common sense points one to the likelihood that a fake nucleoside will operate to some extent, if not to its main extent, as BAD DATA in the tape of life. And THAT means MUTATIONS.

And if remdesivir was doing it, then molnupiravir should do it on STEROIDS.

And I am NOT going to let Fauci explain his way out of this one by any kind of hand-waving, or Shifty-Schiff experiments like Lancetgate.

So where does this go?

I was having a lot of trouble figuring out why the push for remdesivir made sense to a particular PART of the corrupt forces behind the Plandemic.

Remember – AND logic.

In any rally of a giant societal “conspiracy”, which can be as big as:

  • “Let’s all go to the New World for each of our own reasons! It’s OURS!”
  • “The Islamic world attacked our towers! Let’s DO SOMETHING!”
  • “The other people are INSURRECTIONISTS! Arrest them!”
  • “White supremacists! Take away their rights!”
  • “It’s airborne Ebola! Civil rights out the window! We’re all gonna die!”

…..there is always a REASON for every aspect and for every beneficiary, but they’re usually quite different reasons, specific to the individual or group, and thus profoundly motivating.

In other words, these are “conspiracies of fortune”, in which MOST buy in not in an illegal way, but in either an immoral, amoral, or self-deceiving way. Some truly guilty ones secretly initiate the money-grab, and everybody else goes along, making true justice impossible.

It’s a great scam. It happens for ALL of the reasons – not just any one of them.

Still, in that context, things tend to make sense, but generally after the fact.

The advancement of remdesivir just didn’t make SENSE. More than that, its whole terrible history was wrapped up with the liar Anthony Fauci.

But if you back up even further – a useful tactic when things don’t make sense – one comes to the realization that many things about antivirals just don’t make sense.

  • we have good safe ones that “they” seem to hate now, upon their “discovery”
  • those drugs were never promoted or studied properly, IMO
  • the excuses for not vigorously pursuing the class of drugs BEFORE, ring VERY hollow NOW
  • the main class of “allowed” antivirals (ringer nucleosides) seems fundamentally flawed
  • the fundamental flaw (that we are using genetic error as a “cure”) is never acknowledged
  • the fact that we have to cure diseases that never had to exist, like SARS-CoV-2, fails to outrage any of the people in charge, who pushed these Frankenstein gain-of-function experiments to begin with
  • there is a bizarre fixation of vaccines as the only allowed solution to viral disease
  • genetic vaccines are pushed, when antigen vaccines are obviously fundamentally safer
  • genetic antivirals are pushed, when other categories are obviously both safer AND more effective

The LAST points seem to show some commonality, both in leading toward the massive money pit of gene therapy, and in relating to Anthony Fauci.

And THAT is where things start to make sense. The POLITICAL aspects of this. The installation of World Government, their holy grail.

Fauci, Baric, Daszak, Rick Bright, and Hillary Clinton all know what is actually going on – I am convinced of that. They are all knowledgeable, more than others, in the true agenda and schedule of the “Plandemic”, including the POLITICAL GOALS. They understand both the SCAM and the NOBLE (lying) PURPOSE.

I am convinced that VARIANTS are a key construct in the giant grift of COVID. The whole plan has to keep going, by ginning up more COVID as needed, but it also has to look NATURAL, so that nobody finally decides to send about 100 cruise missiles into Wuhan and a spare 20 into various Swiss cities, which would end this entire Globonazi / Chinazi farce once and for all.

OK. Save some for North Carolina and Canada, too. It’s complicated.

They COULD make more variants and release them, but nobody wants to screw up and get caught, like they already have been caught, time and time again, to the point that the whole Globonazi plan might finally get run down like a rabid dog in the middle of the road.

The fact of the matter, however, is that even with DRASTIC homing in on Baric, Daszak and Wuhan from the left, with Fauci finally treed by BEAGLES, of all things, and the rest of us bearing down on them from the right and center, they keep pushing on. They are NOT going to stop.

Variants have now died down due to the mechanics of immunity, largely due to refusal of so many people to take the immunosuppressing phony vaccines. But THAT can be worked around. Don’t think that variants are gone. They’re TOO DAMNED USEFUL.

So how do you get MORE of them, without a ChiCom release operation, to convince all the CHUMPS in science, who will swear on their various manuals and codexes that it’s all real?

Just give a CURE that makes sure there are MORE variants.

Remdesivir doesn’t WORK well enough. It makes money, because ALL modern operations have to make their own money, but it doesn’t promote mutation fast enough. Nor is it administered during the viral maximum, when maximum mutation is possible.

Enter molnupiravir.

Move variants needed? Sure! And in time for their NEXT political operation, a.k.a. the 2022 election!

The way this scam of vaccines and drugs works is really smart.

The narrow vaccines NARROW humanity’s pool of immunity coverage of the spike protein, while decreasing overall immunity, both broad-based immunity to COVID and to other diseases. Meanwhile, the drugs WIDEN the shotgun pattern of the spike to find new variants that evade the vaccines.

This is such an incredibly slick grift, I almost have to applaud it. BRAVO! Satan himself has to be IMPRESSED. New diseases hidden in cures for old ones. And all of it helping to achieve the socialist goal of transforming mankind PER SE.

Before this is over, as they begin to move the increasingly narrow coverage genetically, even the original Wuhan strain will become a “variant of concern” for vaxxies! Ah, what a beautiful SCAM. The irony!

Note that this explains why HCQ and ivermectin cannot be used. They dead-end the scam. One has to have something that completes the “scam cycle” of increasing the problem while pretending to fix it.

This is their modus operandi. They find something that looks like solving a problem, that actually perpetuates the problem, or creates a new and similar one.

Just like “pursue gain of function to prevent gain of function” – which scam was revealed by Judy Mikovits.

If you find Democrats like Fauci anywhere NEAR one of these cyclic grifts, you know you’ve identified a scam correctly.

You have found something communist.

And now you break it.

W

LINK: https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/the-extraordinary-hypocrisy-of-molnupiravir

UK Gov Stats Show COVID Vaccines Don’t Protect Against Death by Delta Scariant

Don’t Believe Me? The Links are Right Here.

OK, people – I’m being conservative here. There MAY be evidence of immune enhancement in the UK data, but I’m not seeing it. What I am seeing, however, is that – viewed very roughly – deaths from COVID in the UK are now pretty much independent of vaccination status.

And these are THEIR numbers, not mine.

And presumably, this is due to IMMUNE ESCAPE. As predicted by that Italian vaccine expert (see below) who used to work for Bill Gates and CEPI (same thing), who came out on Twitter and said “don’t mass vaccinate in a pandemic”.

And presumably also predicted by Bill Gates and other vaccine pushers with hidden agendas, but that’s all speculation as to motive. The DATA, however, is not speculation.

I was led to this data by an interesting path that is worth documenting.

First, I was reading comments on one of the most excellent articles ever written on Coronavirus fascism and the push back against it.

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/07/25/cascade-of-consequences/

I absolutely urge you to read this article. It is a CALL TO ARMS. LINKED ARMS.

People are rising up against the LIES of the Corona Commies, and this article documents all the flip-flop lies.

Back to the story. THIS story. Unpacking one more lie.

There was a comment on the article that I found very interesting.

AL Tru

Research Reveals Vaccinated People More Vulnerable to Delta Variant Than Unvaccinated:

“ The UK government agency Public Health England published a report on Friday that officials who are trying to push the Covid-19 vaccine upon the rest of the world do not want people to see. Data contained within their report revealed people who have received the Covid-19 vaccine are more vulnerable to the Delta variant than those who have not been vaccinated. Their briefing titled “SARS-Cov-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England,” investigated every variant of covid-19 that is currently known. The information contained in the report showed that people who received the covid-19 shot are more than three times likely to die than those who have not received the vaccine.
Out of 117 people who died over a time period of four weeks, 73 of them had received the covid-19 vaccine. That means 63 percent of those who died from the Delta variant had been vaccinated. Information within the chart that can be found on pages 13 and 14 of the report revealed that one of the people who died received their first dose of the covid-19 vaccine within three weeks of when they died. 19 of them had been vaccinated more than three weeks before they died. 50 of the people who died during the four week time span had received both doses of the covid-19 vaccine.”

MOLOGIC Corp. – Bill Gates and George $oros. the new Covid rapid test.

$oylent Greed

There was no link, but bypassing this problem by a handy method which you may guess but which I will not reveal, I found the source.

LINK: https://thesimpsonpost.wordpress.com/2021/06/25/research-reveals-vaccinated-people-more-vulnerable-to-delta-variant-than-unvaccinated/

This blog post was not afraid to link to sources (thank you), even though I remain skeptical of the post itself (more on that in a moment), since I think the conclusions may not be warranted, and without the author showing work, I do NOT come to the same conclusions.

Well, there are LINKS right in the article to the ACTUAL DATA, so why not check it out?

LINK 1: https://www.scribd.com/document/513015366/Variants-of-Concern-VOC-Technical-Briefing-17

LINK 2: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1001354/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_17.pdf

There is a LOT of interesting data here, and I think that guys like Alex Berensen will get a LOT out of it.

I don’t see how the data prove a factor of three worse for the vaccinated. Let me show what is said.

The key claim is this:

The information contained in the report showed that people who received the covid-19 shot are more than three times likely to die than those who have not received the vaccine.

Out of 117 people who died over a time period of four weeks, 73 of them had received the covid-19 vaccine. That means 63 percent of those who died from the Delta variant had been vaccinated. Information within the chart that can be found on pages 13 and 14 of the report revealed that one of the people who died received their first dose of the covid-19 vaccine within three weeks of when they died. 19 of them had been vaccinated more than three weeks before they died. 50 of the people who died during the four week time span had received both doses of the covid-19 vaccine.

Here is the data itself, from the UK report.

Without digging too deeply, some thoughts.

  • the “3-fold” assertion by the author doesn’t seem to account for the fact that most people in England are vaccinated, even though the level is not as high as Israel (roughly 70% vs. roughly 90%). Maybe I’m reading this wrong, but I’m just not seeing it.
  • Even the correlation with numbers of shots seems merely to reflect numbers of the fully and partially vaccinated available for infection (I’m just guessing at rough numbers for any cumulative process).
  • However, very shockingly, I’m not seeing any kind of protection from death, by vaccination status, either way. THAT matches immune escape.
  • England is mostly delta variant now, so the assertion by authorities and Branch Covidians that people are protected against death from delta by the vaccines seems sketchy if we’re kind, FRAUDULENT if we’re more blunt, and most likely propaganda to keep vaccinating.
  • the “3-fold” assertion DOES in fact match the roughly 3-fold ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated in the UK (documented HERE by the UK authorities), and thus one can make a very simple argument that the data are showing UK nakedness to the delta variant when the metric is simply DEATH by COVID.
  • I sure would love to see data on not just the unvaccinated, but the RECOVERED, because I suspect they’re like the Israeli data showing the superiority of disease-conferred immunity – otherwise known as the 1970’s logic that you don’t create vaccines for colds – you catch them, treat them, and don’t use them cynically to install “communism with Western characteristics”.
  • Sweden is looking good – WHY? – my guess is because of large numbers of the NATURALLY IMMUNE. Lockdown stalled natural immunity elsewhere. This even explains the “corrected” Australian data. The world is a laboratory now, rich in data.

Bottom line, I think we need to go back to that virologist / epidemiologist with ties to CEPI (Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche) who posted on Twitter – the guy who said that mass vaccination into a pandemic was a mistake.

We are DEFINITELY seeing immune escape. Put all your money on it.

Are we also seeing immune enhancement? I am tempted to bet big on THAT, too. And even if NOT right now, it only takes one Wuhan Institute and one nearby Chinese prison full of human guinea pigs to find the perfect variant to make immune enhancement a fast and effective reality.

Sociobiological warfare is a bit slower than flat-out biological warfare, but it’s very hard to stop.

I believe that Dr. Vanden Bossche was being honest, and now I believe he was RIGHT.

Excellent updates on his website – I urge you to check them out (specific links below).

Website:

LINK: https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/

His most recent video:

His original statement:

His First Big Interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtHfI00D_s4

LINKS:

Mass infection prevention and mass vaccination with leaky Covid-19 vaccines in the midst of the pandemic can only breed highly infectious variants. (opens PDF of letter to WHO)

A last word of caution to all those pretending the Covid-19 pandemic is toning down

Response to Dr. Bhakdi

Not Covid-19 vaccine-mediated but naturally acquired immunity enables herd immunity

OH – and one final note.

If you don’t TRUST the UK stats, there is one more possibility. They could be HIDING immune enhancement by selectively dropping out data. I view it as entirely possible that they chose to hide the vaccine-halting horrors of immune enhancement by quietly admitting to mere immune escape, and hoping we would pick that up, as I have done here. I have no proof, nor any indications, but others may find some telltale evidence in the data, or elsewhere.

Don’t trust liars is my advice.

W