Dear MAGA: 20261013 ❀ DePat Tuesday ❀ Open Topic | Did Amy Acton Help Light the Federal Fires of COVID Doomerism?

This DePat Tuesday Open Thread honors the author of the original Tuesday open thread on this site, namely the late Susie Sampson, a.k.a. Deplorable Patriot, among her other handles, pen names, etc.

For more on the untimely passing of Dear DePat, please see these three posts.


At one time, DePat handled FOUR daily open threads here, in addition to taking care of her relatives, choir duties, and numerous other responsibilities. She was a powerhouse – a dynamo – a true force of nature.

DePat’s faith in Trump, Q, “The Plan”, the White Hats, and “the anons” in general, was legendary. Although I didn’t always agree with her quick acceptance of some sketchier evidence and fringier theories, I will gladly admit to “coming around” to numerous so-called “conspiracy theories” which she championed first. I was always careful to give her credit for being right, too, when I had been wrong.

It is impossible to overstate how much DePat did for not only this site, but for her country. I urge all to say a quick prayer of thanks, whenever you think of her, for the privilege of knowing, in life or after death, such an exemplary human being, and lover of God.

And thank you, Susie, for the firm foundation which you left us, when you were called to your true home!


Did Amy Acton Help Light the Federal Fires of COVID Doomerism?

TL;DR –

In my opinion, the answer is yes, and I suspect that you will find the full answer fascinating.


Everybody in Ohio knows that Amy Acton – DOCTOR Amy Acton – a.k.a. “Lockdown Amy” – is why Ohio locked down for COVID, and why so many of Ohio’s local restaurants and other businesses closed down, never to return.

But what most people don’t know, is that Amy also apparently had a role in influencing the White House to join the party to “flatten the curve”.

Don’t take my word for it – take the word of Amy Acton’s own staff members, as I will explain in detail, below.


Background

I recently posted about a couple of Amy Acton videos, and how they were evidence of “two Amy Actons” – (1) the real one, who talks like a drunk and curls up on a fetal position on the floor of the restroom – and (2) the imaginary one created by her staff and party – the one who is competent, the heroine of the COVID years, and has zero issues.

As I noted in that post, both videos are a bit tragic.

In the first video, by the New York Times, we see some of the cringiest left-wing media propaganda ever. It’s like an ad for Kamala’s Best Nutritious Word Salad – made in California. Yes – Amy Acton sounds like Kamala’s lost sister. The vocal similarity is uncanny, and I would not be surprised if white wine coolers are to Plame. Blame. Whatever.

Not to say that the CIA is definitely involved here, but Acton was clearly being made a heroine for adopting the left’s favorite captured agency’s COVID panic control script, while authentically heroic character seems a bit lacking.

Here’s the video.

https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000007111965/coronavirus-ohio-amy-acton.html

If you watched the whole thing, congratulations. I was repeatedly cringing out, every time I tried to watch.

The second video is a lot more fun. Amy Acton is quite lovable in it, but in a way that makes her absolutely unfit for higher office. I can’t tell if she’s tipsy, floating on Xanax, or just high on her 15 minutes of fame, but there is no way such a woman can be allowed into the Ohio Statehouse as anything but a tourist, or perhaps as a mom testifying on an educational issue, where a courage drink or two is socially acceptable for first-time speakers, as long as they have a designated driver.

What’s most interesting, however, is that the TRANSCRIPT doesn’t match the video at all. And while it’s not really a problem that Amy’s staff chose not to document her rambling, emotional, and sometimes incoherent, group-hug psychobabble, what IS interesting is what they released in its place.

Tell me if this doesn’t sound like Amy Acton single-handedly saved America from COVID-infected J6-er kidnappers, and was personally responsible for Trump choosing to follow her advice to BE A HERO, locking down and flattening the curve!

https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/healthmatrix/vol34/iss1/3

Yes – according to Amy Acton’s aides and handlers, SHE was responsible for Trump doing the right thing on COVID.

In the midst of several pages of breathless, Barnes & Noble-grade COVID doomerist “historical fiction”, this paragraph appears…..

During the last week of February, as the stock market crashed for
the second time, I was at the White House as a Health Department
Director representing the entire Midwest for the Association of State
and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO). Mick Mulvaney, the
President’s Chief of Staff, and some of the best people who have served
multiple presidents were in attendance. One bioterrorism expert was
literally shaking. But they were still not talking about the disease on
the news. Even though I had taught global health for years, I Googled
the word “pandemic.” I could not understand why we were not using
the word. We went around the room, and each person gave their best
virology and epidemiology advice. When it was my turn, most had been
said, but I was struck by what was not being said to the country. Just
like everyone else, I was longing to hear the hard truth. So I told Mr.
Mulvaney, “Please tell the President that this is the higher angel’s
moment. The people need to hear from him.” This is that FDR,
Winston Churchill moment where communication is vital, and my gut
sense was that we really needed the President to make meaning out of
all we were facing. To help us bear the shared sacrifices, we needed
someone to lead the war. Only this time, the entire world was on the
same side.

UGH!!!

Some of that account may be a bit self-serving, but the point is, THIS was a moment when both COVID doomerism and “the opportunity for heroic response” were pushed on POTUS, and yes – Amy Acton was there, helping it happen.

Dramatically or not. Sober or not.

Now, I wasn’t ready to believe this statement without at least a wee bit of validation – so I chose to find out what Mick Mulvaney might have to say about that era now. And he does indeed have a lot to say.

It seems clear to me that Mulvaney fell for what most of us fell for – the possibility that we were dealing with something comparable to SARS, MERS, Ebola, and all that jazz. That we were dealing with an exotic “coronavirus” with double-digit mortality in young adults – NOT with something that had a very normal flu-like mortality curve – like all influenza-like illnesses, including the known, endemic, human coronaviruses.

Once the real numbers came out – once I saw those real numbers in public – it should have been over – but the Democrats just kept pretending, to the power-enthralled audience of their captured states and institutions.

Amy never corrected herself on this error. Trump, Vivek, and even I did. Some sooner than others.

SO – does Ohio REALLY want to elect this ditzy, pretending, overly dramatic broad to be governor? “Lockdown Amy” Acton?

PLEASE. Let’s be serious here.

W

And remember…….

Until victory, have faith!

And trust the big plan, too!

And as always….

ENJOY THE SHOW

W



Dear MAGA: 20260924 ✾ TRUST THE PLAN ✾ Thursday Open Topic | Dr. Amy Acton, Queen of Cringe


Sometimes you have to have faith.

Yes, Virginia, there is a Plan!


We have created this site as a place for people to openly express their thoughts and opinions. This is a place where honest but civil discussion of all topics is encouraged. This particular thread is – for the moment – TRUST THE PLAN Thursday. You are welcome to say what you think, in a civil and courteous manner that loves your neighbor. Free speech matters! Courteous speech makes it happen.

Please label all AI-generated content as being such, unless it is patently obvious (e.g., humorous AI images). It is important that we as individuals not begin to pretend that socially derived artificial intelligence is actually our own, as this form of stealthy social information averaging and feedback would be one more pretense and deception between people, in service of stupid Marxist socialism, and of those who wish to substitute their communally protected lies for actual truth.

You are you. AI is AI. Keep your identity. Don’t “Borg Out” on us!

And yes, it’s THURSDAY…again.

That was stolen from Wheatie.

Let’s steal her rules, too.

  • No food fights.
  • No running with scissors.
  • If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

Other rules may be derivable from these, and that conjecture is left for discussion.


Our Mission Orders

Just to make sure you can see that…..


Retrocultural Reminders (Future Proves Past, Past Anchors Future)

Pontifications

Dr. Amy Acton, Queen of Cringe

Amy Acton seems like an enigma – until you realize that there are two Amy Actons.

One of them is the real Amy Acton. Who I will call Real Amy Acton. She’s likable, but in a ditzy, scatter-brained, and often cringey way. There is absolutely no way that this person should have been a Director of Health. She could never, ever, be the governor of a state.

The other Amy Acton – who I will call Imaginary Amy Acton – is a mirage – a creation. She’s not very likable, but she is competent. She obeys Democrat policy, because she is the creation of professional Democrats. On paper, she sounds quite different from the real Amy Acton, because she’s not the real Amy Acton. She’s like a Soviet consensus on what Amy Acton is supposed to think and believe.

It’s no wonder the Democrats in Ohio are not allowing either Amy Acton to debate Vivek Ramaswamy.

I would like to show you some select insights into this lady, that will help you understand.

Let’s start with a recent X post by Dr. Acton – or Lockdown Amy as she is known, that I find both attractive and a bit out of touch. This is Real Amy Acton.

Let’s look at those selfies more closely.

At first glance, I really liked these images. She’s like a neighbor, going out and eating at some restaurant and posting a tweet about it. That’s very real. It’s very likable. If she wasn’t running for office, I’d think “Hey! That’s Amy Acton, that doctor lady from Columbus!”

I find it interesting that there’s nobody around, and I think that says a lot about her campaign. I think the Democrats may not be thinking she can win, or even planning on winning. I think perhaps they’re grooming her for head of HHS, or CDC, or something like that, should the Demon Donkeys ever get back in the White House.

Next point – while I think it’s awesome that Dr. Acton is having a MONSTROUS steak (I have not had one like that in years), I don’t see that image as being politically wise right now – unless she’s desperate for some carnivore crossover votes that she’s surely not going to get, IMO. Indeed, that picture drew lots of criticism on her timeline, although it’s hard to know how much of that criticism is real, and how much is just AI bots going after her. I see the “same but opposite” on all the GOP timelines.

But what is Imaginary Dr. Amy Acton like?

Well, politically, there are some problems.

Ohio here is what Amy Acton will not tell us out loud.

Amy Acton supports:

⯈Abortion ( even up to 9 months )
⯈Sanctuary cities
⯈Illegal invaders
⯈Entitlements for illegals
⯈Higher taxes to pay for entitlements to illegals
⯈Cuts in police
⯈Shutting Ohio down
⯈Forcing more vaccines on Ohioans ( especially children)
⯈Not allowing ICE to operate in Ohio
⯈Allowing lunatic liberal protesters to take over Ohio cities

Amy Acton is running on two things. Brown man is bad. ( Which is racist ) and she will somehow make things less expensive ( for generational entitlement freeloaders ).

She is 100% for socialism not free choice.

NO VOTE AMY ACTON

SO – yeah – Imaginary Amy Acton – the one who would actually be in charge of Ohio – is pretty left-wing, despite some serious efforts to pass her off as moderate right now.

I started looking more deeply into Acton’s background, especially back in her “COVID czarina” days, and what I found is both laughable and disturbing.

Two videos. The first was the New York Slimes singing her praises in early 2020, as the “pandemic” was just getting started. Here is the thumbnail (not an active video).

OMG, it is SO CRINGE! SO VERY CRINGE!!!

You get Real Amy Acton talking, but you get the Times pretending they are talking to Imaginary Amy Acton. This is how they sell one to the public, to install the other in office.

Amy Acton even SOUNDS like Kamala Harris. Just listen.

https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000007111965/coronavirus-ohio-amy-acton.html

Amy Acton has been a PROJECT of the left from day one. But now, after the fall of both COVID communism and Kamala Harris, Real Amy Acton is clearly not fit for the job. She was never fit for her earlier job, either.

But it gets worse. Much worse.

Imagine CRINGE SQUARED.

Imagine a video of an event CELEBRATING the first video.

Imagine an event – a lecture given by Real Dr. Acton – celebrating Imaginary Dr. Acton’s “success” as the popularly evicted COVID czarina.

Imagine Amy at her absolute CRINGIEST, WOKEST, and DIZZIEST. Yes. She’s ten times more out to lunch than in any modern video.

Yes, it’s THAT BAD. Although it is fun and entertaining, like talking to a tipsy female doctor in a bar.

I kid you not.

There is a “transcript” which is actually an essay derived from the second video. The essay is clearly a re-write of Real Amy Acton’s speech by somebody else, to make her sound like Imaginary Amy Acton. It’s hard to tell that they’re even related.

https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/healthmatrix/vol34/iss1/3

Both of these videos are mind-boggling reminders of just how psychotic the COVID years were. And Amy Acton – both of them – was fully riding along with all that dubious psychosis. All the psychosis that was dubious then, and is horrifying now.

These videos are gold mines of cringey error, bad science, dictatorial hubris, talking down to the public, cargo-cult hero-worship, wishful remembrance, and all the rest. I hope to give both videos their own threads in the future, before the election, but you are welcome to dig in now.


So what’s the verdict?

Real Amy Acton may be a nice person and a good neighbor. Stripped of her goofy politics, she seems like a very typical, very likable, Ohio mom. Real Amy’s a bit more entertaining than most, either because of (1) alcohol, (2) xanax, or (3) naturally dizzy mentality. Provided that Real Amy Acton doesn’t drive drunk, she would be welcome in almost any neighborhood in Ohio. She does not strike me as a bad person.

But that is not why we have governors. We have governors to make difficult choices correctly – to do the right things, and to not do the wrong things. And Real Amy Acton is NOT governor material.

But neither is Imaginary Amy Acton – the competent leftist.

Imaginary Amy Acton is what we would get – and it would be even worse than those brutal COVID days.

We have to get that word out. Ohio doesn’t need the trouble it would have, if Amy Acton – any version of her – was Governor.

W

Health Friday 1.16.2026 Open Thread: The Baric Files, Part Five: United States Department of Defense (now Department of War); 18 U.S.C. 2339; 18 U.S.C. 1001; and,15 U.S.C. 1-3

The header image for today’s offering of a vintage cover page of the United States Code (U.S.C.) is courtesy of Highline College Library and Google Images.

Health Friday is series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s offering speaks of the disaster of COVID-19 (the bioweapon virus itself, and the bioweapon “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to all persons, of whatever age or location, who have suffered (or still suffer) from injuries, illnesses, or disabilities induced from either an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself, or induced from “vaccination” by COVID-19 “vaccines”; or, who have passed away from the negative effects of an infection by the COVID-19 virus itself, or from the negative effects of the COVID-19 “vaccines” they had in their body.

There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie;, and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linke here. Note: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for AI-generated content. To the best of her knowledge and belief, there is none, except for AI-generated content within linked URLs. If readers wish to post AI-generated content to today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.

Special Note regarding today’s offering: In no way is the following, or The Baric Files series in general in Health Friday posts, to be construed as a “character assassination”, or as an “indictment”, or as any other type of attack or smear on Ralph S. Baric, PhD, of the UNC GIllings School of Global Public Health of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, or of his lab at the university. The linked scientific papers, images therefrom, and other information about Dr. Baric (such as his Curriculum Vitae [1]) are all available on the internet. The ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are by Yours Truly. There is a plethora of items related to Dr. Baric; Yours Truly will focus on some of them in each part of The Baric Files.

Part One through Part Four of The Baric Files are linked here: https://www.theqtree.com/2025/12/05/health-friday-12-5-2025-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-one/; https://theqtree.com/2025/12/12/health-friday-12-12-2025-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-two-of-mice-rabbits-and-ai-23946/; https://www.theqtree.com/2026/01/02/health-friday-1-2-2026-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-three-patents-dr-anthony-fauci/; https://www.theqtree.com/2026/01/09/health-friday-1-9-2026-open-thread-the-baric-files-part-four-ecohealth-alliance-wuhan-institute-of-virology-dr-zheng-li-shi-the-template-patent/.

Thus far, in the research journey of Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, of the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, it has been seen that Dr. Baric progressed from the study of a certain virus (the Sindbid virus) carried by a certain mosquito — to the study of coronaviruses in other animals (mice, rabbits, pigs) — to the study of the SARS-CoV virus — to the inventions of, and applications of, methods to lab-create chimeric coronaviruses — to the invention of the “template virus” for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, for which Dr. Baric was granted the Patent in 2016.

However, there are other aspects in the research journey of Dr. Baric, one of which is: his involvement with the United States Defense Department.

Today’s offering is Part Five of six.

United States Department of Defense:

It appears that Dr. Baric has been involved with the United States Defense Department since at least 2018, if not before. The DEFUSE Proposal document that was presented to the Defense Department by Dr. Peter Daszak, then-CEO of EcoHealth Alliance, was written, in part, by Dr. Baric. Yours Truly covered this proposal in Part Four of The Baric Files (see above URL); and, is indebted to Jon Fleetwood for the linked article in today’s offering. Please see screenshots from his article [2], below:

From the DEFUSE Proposal document (top); and, from emails by Dr. Daszak regarding the proposal:

Again, from the DEFUSE Proposal document, below; this, about the furin cleavage sites in the potential SARS-CoV sequence that would be developed by Dr. Baric at his lab:

As Yours Truly wrote in Part Four of The Baric Files, the Defense Department did not pursue the DEFUSE Proposal. However, other entities did fund Gain-of-Function research that would result in the lab-creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. These other entities include NIH / NIAID. These other entities also include DTRA (Defense Threat Reduction Agency), a division within the Defense Department. Two examples are: first, grant HDTRA11710064, which helped to fund a September 2020 paper co-authored by Dr. Baric [3]. Please see the screenshots from this paper, below: first, the Funding statement; then, the Conclusion:

A second example is HDTRA1-1C-C-0072, the grant which funded the development (invention) of the antiviral drug, EIDD-2801 (now known as molnupiravir [LAGEVRIO], a treatment for SARS-CoV-2 [COVID-19] infection.) [4]. Emory University and Dr. Ralph Baric collaborated on this work. Molnupiravir is theoretically supposed to “mimic” natural Uridine, thus supposedly assisting in fighting a COVID-19 infection. The problem is that molnupiravir is a dangerous drug intervention; one that must be administered only under strict conditions and only for a limited number of days. Please see the screenshots from the Emory University press release regarding EIDD-2801, below:

The FDA Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers for molnupiravir (LAGEVRIO) [5] lists the following required instructions for administration of the drug:

**** Yours Truly will not comment on, but simply mention, the irony that Dr. Ralph Baric, by September 2020, had already invented and Patented the SARS-CoV-2 virus (Patent Number US9884895B2, presented in Part Four of The Baric Files); that the Patent describes “methods for treatment” for an infection of this virus; and, that it appears that Emory University either did not know about said Patent, or ignored it.

**** Yours Truly will also comment on, but simply mention, the irony that molnupiravir (LAGEVRIO) attempts to “mimic” the Uridine in the body of a person “vaccinated” with a modRNA COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “vaccine” (such as, BNT162b2 / COMIRNATY by Pfizer-BioNTech, which contains the lab-created compound N1-Methylpseudouridine, a compound that DESTROYS the natural Uridine RNA in the “vaccinated” person’s body.)

Fort Detrick involvement with Dr. Baric (including USAMRIID):

Fort Detrick, located at Frederick, Maryland, is a United States Army military base and biological laboratory; it is also the location of the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) [6].

An article in the People’s Daily (Communist China) in September 2021 drew attention to Dr. Baric’s involvement with Fort Detrick [7]. Granted, the CCP was doing / is likely still doing, all it can to deflect attention to the activities at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the lab-creation of the COVID-19 virus; however, it confirms that Dr. Baric was involved, not only with the WIV, but also with the United States Defense Department, in the lab-creation of the virus. Please see the screenshot, below, from the People’s Daily article:

The People’s Daily article mentions two papers. The first, from 2006, [8], regards the Cynomolgus Macaque as a “model” for SARS infection. Please see the screenshot from this paper, below:

Yours Truly notes that, except for two co-authors associated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and for the co-author Dr. Ralph Baric, every other co-author of this 2006 paper is associated with the United States military — Fort Detrick; Walter Reed Army Hospital; and, other Defense Department facilities. In addition, it appears that Gain-of-Function techniques were used in the work.

The other paper mentioned in the People’s Daily article, from 2003 [9], regards the use of reverse genetics to create a full-length cDNA SARS code (in other words, Gain-of-Function research.) Please see the Abstract from this paper, below:

Yours Truly will note the following that are also listed in the October 2003 paper: first, the top of the Affliations list in the sidebar linked from the Authors Info & Affiliations hyperlink in the paper; and, second, the Affiliations entry regarding Dr. Ralph Baric from that list, which states that he is affiliated with USAMRIID:

Another item linking Dr. Baric to USAMRIID: the talk that he gave at the USAMRIID annual research conference in 2023 [10]. Please see the screenshot from the article on this event, below:

(By the way, another speaker at this event in 2023 was Dr. Deborah Birx, herself a 29-year Army veteran.)

18 U.S.C. 2339; 18 U.S.C. 1001; and, 15 U.S.C. 1-3:

Yours Truly now turns to the work of Dr. David E. Martin, PhD. Dr. Martin is founder and CEO of M-CAM, Inc., a company that specializes in intellectual property risk management. A screenshot of a portion of his biography, from a conference in 2006 [11], is below:

In 2021, Dr. Martin wrote and published The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier [12]. The following screenshots are from this Dossier.

Page 2, Background, regarding Patents granted to Dr. Baric and to UNC:

Page 8, Dr. Baric and Dr. Shi: Related to 18 U.S.C. 2339 — Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror:

Page 12, DARPA and NIH funding of biomedical research: related to 18 U.S.C. 1001 –Lying to Congress:

The following three portions of the Dossier are related to 15 U.S.C. 1-3 — Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity:

Page 16, NIH and biodefense Gain-of-Function funding for Dr. Baric:

Page 17, more on Dr. Baric:

Page 18: Dr. Baric: DARPA involvement; biodefense awards to Dr. Baric / UNC (funneled via NIAID):

The Biodefense Grants to Dr. Baric / UNC are “officially” from the “Southeast Regional Centers of Excellence for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases”, headquartered at UNC Chapel Hill. However, this entity (one of several such Regional Centers located in various areas of the United States) is funded by NIAID. NIAID, in turn, is in a “cooperative program” with USAMRIID (https://www.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/category_a_progress_report.pdf, “NIAID Biodefense Research Agenda for CDC Category A Agents Progress Report”, August 2003, Page 6.)

Summary: In Part Five of The Baric Files, it can be seen that the research journey of Dr. Ralph Baric, PhD, has progressed from the study of a certain mosquito that carries a certain virus (the Sindbid virus) — to the study of coronaviruses in other animals (mice and rabbits) — to the study of a certain coronavirus that occurs in pigs (the TGEV coronavirus) — to the study and application of methods to lab-create coronaviruses and the injection of such chimeric viruses into lab animals to study the effects of said injections — to the granting of Patents to Dr. Baric for this work — to the study of the SARS-line of coronaviruses — to the invention of the “template virus” for SARS-CoV-2 by Dr. Baric and the granting of the Patent to him for this invention — to Dr. Baric’s involvement with various divisions of the United States Defense Department in the lab-creation of coronaviruses. Along the way in his research journey, Dr. Baric was involved with the Dr. Zheng-li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Along the way in his research journey, some of the funding for Dr. Baric’s work was provided by the United States Defense Department (and some of which funding was “relayed” through NIAID.)

Questions that arise: Is Dr. Ralph Baric still affiliated with USAMRIID? Who exactly at NIAID accepted the funding from the United States Defense Department? Who exactly at NIAID signed the approval to send these funds to Dr. Baric? How much, if any, of the work performed by Dr. Baric with funding by the United States Defense Department was shared with Pfizer-BioNTech, or with Moderna, or with both companies?

To be continued in Part Six.

THE COVID-19 BIOWEAPON “VACCINES” — ALL OF THEM — MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET AND FROM ALL USE IN THE UNITED STATES. NOW. PERIOD.

THERE. MUST. BE. ACCOUNTABILITY.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

THERE. MUST. BE. TRUTH.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: With the exception of linked scientific papers and other items available on the Internet in today’s offering, the ideas and conclusions in today’s offering are by PAVACA. Proper credit must be given to PAVACA if the ideas and conclusions of today’s offering are used by other blog writers, by podcasters, in social media, or in print media.)

References:

[1]: “Curriculum Vitae Ralph Baric.” https://sph.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/112/2016/09/CV_Ralph_Baric.pdf. 2016.

[2]: “SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site Sits at Exact Amino Acid Residue Location Designated By 2018 DEFUSE Document.” Jon Fleetwood. https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/sars-cov-2-furin-cleavage-site-sits?utm_source=publication-search. 8 December 2025.

[3]: “Possibility for reverse zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to free-ranging wildlife: A case study of bats.” Ralph S.. Baric, et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008758. 3 September 2020.

[4]: “Emory, collaborators testing antiviral drug as potential treatment for coronaviruses.” https://news.emory.edu/stories/2020/02/coronavirus_eidd/index.html. February 2020.

[5]: “molnupiravir (LAGEVRIO) Package Insert.” https://www.fda.gov/media/155054/download.

[6]: “Fort Detrick.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Detrick.

[7]: “What are behind Ralph Baric’s deep ties with Fort Detrick?” Zhou Fujing. https://en.people.cn/n3/2021/0907/9000-9892964.html. 7 September 2021.

[8]: “Cynomolgus Macaque as an Animal Model for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.” Ralph Baric, et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030149. 18 April 2006.

[9]: “Reverse genetics in full-length infectious cDNA of severe acute respiratory coronavirus.” Ralph Baric, Mark R. Denison, Lisa E. Hensley, et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1735582100. 20 October 2003.

[10]: “Birx, Baric Headline Annual Research Festival.” Ramin A. Khalili, USAMRDC Public Affairs Office. https://mrdc.health.mil/index.cfm/media/articles/2021/birx_bari_headline_annual_research_festival. “Last Modified Date: 23 May 2023.”

[11]: “WIPO Open Forum on the Draft Substantive Patent Law Treaty Speakers: David E. Martin, PhD.” https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/2006/csp_of_ge_06/speakers/martin.html. 2006.

[12]: “The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier.” David E. Martin, PhD. https://www.gospanews.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf. August 2021.

COVID – Give Us Your Current Thoughts and Theories

Clinical_Stages_of_COVID.png

This is a very open-ended post. The goal is to get YOUR thoughts, opinions, and theories.

Without getting too deep, I can tell you that we are seeing a LOT of COVID in my world. It seems to be everywhere. But some apparent attempts to get masks going again are fizzling out fast, thank goodness.

So I’m curious what others are seeing. But beyond that, we’ve had almost 5 years of COVID in this world – maybe more.

Time for reassessment – particularly prior to the election.

Time for some fresh ground reports.

What think you about COVID?

Tell us what you’re seeing and thinking, please!!!

W

Pfizer and Moderna Vaccines Both Contain the PRRARSV Key to the Cell Nucleus

TL;DR-

The bottom line is that I have simply checked the gene sequences of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, and verified that they BOTH contain nucleic acid code that translates to the shorter PRRARSV protein code, which is a kind of “hall pass” into the cell nucleus.

Thus, BOTH of these vaccines produce a spike protein which science would predict has the same ability as the virus spike protein, to (1) get into the cell nucleus, and furthermore (2) schlep its own mRNA along with it into the cell nucleus, and finally (3) as proven by experiment on the Pfizer vaccine, integrate the spike protein gene sequence into the human cellular genome.

That’s it. If you want all the gory details, stay tuned. Otherwise, that’s the BLUF (bottom line up front). Have a great day! -Wolf


Introduction

OK – I have an important update to the whole topic of mRNA vaccines messing with people’s genes, and in particular, with a part of the COVID-19 spike protein mRNA sequence called the PRRARSV nuclear translocation signal. This “key” within the whole sequence is like an ID card for the cell nucleus. It was identified in the natural COVID-19 spike protein, and now it appears to remain in both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

I have posted on this topic – the PRRARSV Nuclear Translocation Signal – THREE times before.

First, I posted when I discovered the Mehedi paper, and realized how important it is.

The Mehedi paper explains WHY there is genomic incorporation of the COVID-19 spike protein – specifically, because the spike protein has what is essentially a key to the cell nucleus.


Genomic DNA Incorporation of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Explained by Unique Hidden Key to Nucleus and Spike’s Surprising Ability to Transport mRNA

This is SO HUGE. I must explain this to you. TL;DR – The spike protein not only contains a special sequence that allows it into the cell nucleus – it also has an ability to bring its own spike mRNA sequence with it. Both features appear to be unique among coronaviruses. The features explain genomic …


The next time I posted, was the moment that I realized that the murdered American scientist Bing Liu had been directing his research focus to the EXACT SAME SPOT in the SARS-CoV-2 gene sequence – the PRRARSV sequence – when he was conveniently murdered by a crazed acquaintance who was apparently contending with him over a lover.

To me, this murder absolutely REEKED of MKULTRA. Bing Liu had a plausible weakness and it was exploited. Not all people realize how dangerous the science world can be. Not so this cowboy – I’ve been through a lot of weird, evil bullshit in Scienceville, over the years.

Bing apparently recognized that this sequence is found in snake venoms and other, more deadly viruses, and was thus potentially close to realizing that this part of the sequence was behind certain aspects of the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2, as well as those other things.

Stated another way – maybe nuclear translocation is WHY those other things are so bad.


Dear KMAG: 20230130 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Bing Liu Murder Potentially Linked to PRRARSV Nuclear Translocation Signal in Spike Protein of COVID Vaccines

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President: AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS. This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both). …


Finally, at a certain point I realized that any “accidental” explanation of the presence of a working translocation signal which not only violates the central promise of mRNA vaccine technology, but installs the violation itself in the nucleus, was simply too incongruous to be an accident. It’s a BLOODY HACK. There was no way that – on the very first roll-out of a genetic vaccine – the technology which was PRIZED for making the technology safe against genetic incorporation, instead caused genetic incorporation OF the very instructions for genetic incorporation.

I mean, think about it. What are the chances? It’s almost as crazy as the sinking of the “unsinkable” Titanic.

You see what I’m sayin’? This outrageously excellent attack simply cannot be a case of “whoops”. The TRICK is not the “AW SHUCKS, THAT’S LIFE” which sells as stage two to the hubris of the chumps. That’s just the getaway. The TRICK is the LIE – the PROMISE that is actively worked against from the very beginning, and intentionally not delivered.

Hanlon’s Razor, go to hell!


mRNA Vaccines that Breach the Nucleus and Change the Genome – What are the Chances?

Ask yourself a simple question. Why should the very first examples of mRNA vaccines for humans violate the most important safety standard of the mRNA platform? Why would the vaccines do exactly what they PROMISED US the vaccines would not do? TL;DR – They didn’t just lie to us about the spike mRNA not going …


I wrote that last post with a certain sense of frustration. NOBODY in COVID Dissident World seemed to understand the importance of this whole “nuclear translocation signal” thing. Either that, or they were utterly afraid to speak of it. Indeed, our RDS is one of the few people who has dared to shine a light on the topic.

I set it aside for a while and basically gave up.

The other side did not give up. During that time, I was seriously shadow-banned on Twitter. Elon’s FEDS are busy little beavers, damming up the truth.

But now, something interesting has happened. On Twitter.


A Tale of Two Acronyms: PRRARSV and SV40

RDS posted a comment that included a tweet of a translated video of the brave Japanese professor who publicly challenged the Japanese Ministry of Health over the crappy vaccines.

Here, Murakami is discussing contaminating plasmid DNA (little circles of DNA) which were found in very significant quantity in expired vials of the Pfizer vaccine. It’s easier to watch the video on Twitter.

This SV40 stuff also gets into a shocker about nuclear incorporation, but this is not the same shocker as the PRRARSV stuff. This is ANOTHER ANGLE on a different path into the nucleus.

Are you starting to believe me now about intent? Read on.

The translation is as follows. It is a conversation between Professor Murakami (M) and another person (P). I may have gotten a couple of assignments mixed up, when both are talking, but have done my best to attribute statements properly, based on what I can discern.


Commentary by Professor Murakami

(M) It is now possible to read the DNA sequences present in the vaccines. This is the DNA read from the Moderna vaccine.

(P) It may be difficult for the general public to understand, but this sequence is in the form of a ring. Plasmid DNA is in the form of a ring, and the DNA sequence is described in this ring. Spike proteins are encoded in this part of the DNA sequence.

(M) This part of the DNA sequence shows the spike gene. The Moderna’s vaccine has a vector sequence that is often present in Escherichia coli. However, the Pfizer’s vaccine has a staggering problem. I have made an amazing finding. This figure is an enlarged view of Pfizer’s vaccine sequence. As you can see, the Pfizer’s vaccine sequence contains part of the SV40 sequence here. This sequence is known as a promoter. Roughly speaking, the promoter causes increased expression of the gene. The promoter is a sequence that is essential for gene expression. The problem is that the sequence is present in a well-known carcinogenic virus. The question is why such a sequence that is derived from such a cancer virus is present in the Pfizer’s. There should be absolutely no need for such a carcinogenic virus sequence in the vaccine. This sequence is totally unnecessary for producing the mRNA vaccine. It is a problem that such a sequence is solidly contained in the vaccine. This is not the only problem. If a sequence this is present in the DNA, the DNA is easily migrated to the nucleus. So it means that the DNA can easily enter the genome. The problem is that if such a sequence remains intact, the DNA is easily migrated to the nucleus. It means that the DNA can easily enter the nucleus. These are such alarming problems.

(P) Does it mean that the SV40 promoter also contains sequences that can be migrated to the nucleus?

(M) Yes, that’s what I mean.

(P) So you are saying that the DNA can go to the nucleus easily?

(M) It means that the DNA contains sequences that can easily go to the nucleus. This is a well-known fact. This fact has already been documented in a number of scientific literature. It is essential to remove such sequences. The sequences have to be removed. However, Pfizer produced the vaccines without removing the sequences.

(P) This is outrageously malicious.

(M) That’s right. Pfizer retained the SV40 promoter sequence which is completely unrelated to the in vitro synthesis of the messenger.

(P) This issue should be questioned. Why such a promoter sequence is present in the DNA? This kind of promoter sequence is completely unnecessary for the production of the mRNA vaccine. In fact, SV40 is a promoter of cancer viruses.

(M) Yes, SV40 is well known.

(P) The sequence that promotes the cancer virus is present in the DNA for some reasons. As we know, we use this SV40 promoter sequence in various experiments. However, the question is why the promoter sequence is present in this mRNA vaccine.


Do YOU have some questions at this point? I sure as hell do. And the presence of multiple PHARMA TROLLS on Twitter, muddying the water with disingenuous excuses and throw-away coddles, makes things look even more suspicious.

RDS and I discussed this at some length in Saturday’s open. I urge interested readers to follow the above link, repeated here, to see our talk about this video, but it is not necessary for the following discussion.

I then proceeded to Twitter, and got caught up in a variety of arguments between the awesome Jikkyleaks and various “defenders of the narrative”, to put it kindly.

Many of these people (I will avoid calling them “pharma trolls”) shoot from the hip, and – despite sometimes being what should be experts in their fields, seem to have no grasp of basic logic applied to basic principles of biology. They are perfect, however, for defending scientific orthodoxy in a somewhat religious manner.

Meanwhile, sharper people in biotech who understand the basic WTF (like the presence of extraneous DNA in an RNA vaccine being an actual problem) are literally running toward the enemy with the downfall of the original vaccine sales narrative.

I should add, at this point, that SOMEBODY at Twitter is desperately covering all of this up. Twitter uses a stealthy way of “downgrading replies” to hide really important pharma stuff, without overtly banning content. It’s rather ingenious, but it’s VERY frustrating.

First of all, these Twitter IC people are fooling the hell out of Elon Musk – or maybe they aren’t. Either way, some of the most important biology about the vaccines is being hidden, and IMO it sucks big-time.

Thus, it was nearly impossible for me to find the following conversation again. Twitter had hidden my comments so effectively, that I myself could not find them in my own timelines of Tweets and Replies. But with persistence, I did find them.

This conversation and the interspersed commentary explains the how and why of my verifying that the nuclear translocation signal IS in fact in the two main mRNA vaccines – and in my opinion, intentionally so.

Enjoy.

We begin with a Pharm Boy attacking Murakami’s analysis.

You can smell what is up right away. Taylor had been responded to by one of the more active science fighters, Kevin McKernan.

The linked paper is HERE:

LINK: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16010286/

The cited part of the abstract is here:

The abstract, with the relevant text in BOLD, is here:

ABSTRACT

One of the steps that limit transfection efficiency in non-viral gene delivery is inefficient nuclear import of plasmid DNA, once it has been delivered into the cytoplasm. Recently, via microinjection into the cytoplasm and in situ hybridizations into a few cell types, it was shown that a region of Simian virus 40(SV40), specifically a c. 372-bp fragment of SV40 genomic DNA encompassing the SV40 promoter-enhancer-origin of replication (SV40 DTS), could enable the nuclear import of a plasmid carrying these sequences (Dean D.A. Exp. Cell Res. 230 (1997) 293). In this report, we address the issue of the suitability of the SV40 DTS for cationic lipid-mediated gene delivery, and its capacity to improve the efficiency of the transfection process. For this study, we used transient reporter gene expression assays on various cell types. The gene expression from the plasmid constructs carrying the SV40 DTS varied with cell type and plasmid construct used. Such cell-type and plasmid-construct dependency on gene expression from plasmids containing the SV40 DTS suggests that the gene expression from plasmids is not entirely dependent on its ability to enhance the nuclear import of said plasmids.

The smarmy Taylor responds to this, as follows.

McKernan does not respond to this, and I don’t know whether Taylor’s point is valid, but assuming that it is correct, the point stands – is the fragment included sufficient to enable nuclear translocation?

This is where I decided to “inject” the fact that there already IS a nuclear translocation signal present (in the lipid nanoparticle) in the spike protein mRNA, so that RNA may be covering for DNA transport as well. But I wanted to make sure that McKernan saw it – I don’t particularly care about Taylor. So I answered directly to McKernan, on the same tweet that Taylor used. I included a link to the Mehedi paper, which is sorely under-exposed.

I figured that Taylor would respond, and he/she/it did immediately.

[SIDEBAR – I would not be surprised if Twitter insiders are helping these pharma bots by – e.g. – making sure that Taylor Ray and fellow “influencers” can see my input, but that my fellow free scientists, including Kevin McKernan, cannot.]

Taylor’s comment, beginning with “this paper is about something else”, betrays a kind of battered science syndrome that keeps science exactly where the Cabal wants it – defending its own orthodoxy – never questioning by looking off the plantation. It is based on exactly the kind of authority-and-orthodoxy-defending, “teacher’s pet” science that I detest.

Yes, there is a very legitimate question about “virus versus vaccine” – that a VIRUS result is not exactly the same as a VACCINE result. However, if you’re looking at the same or similar things happening for both, and one has a shared culprit, what does logic say?

The entire vaccine paradigm is built on the idea of virus-vaccine symmetry, so if you’re not looking honestly at “virus predicts vaccine” as your FIRST STEP of analysis, you’re never going to predict anything.

Which, by the way, is exactly what the Cabal wants.

This is a perfect example of “unethical skepticism”, as The Ethical Skeptic teaches us.

Taylor at least has the decency of adding a weak and wobbly excuse for a difference – “whose binding site is inactivated”.

This is chaff and countermeasures, as Sundance likes to say. See if you can put that together from my measured, friendly response.

What I’m saying here implies that the “inactivated binding site” in the vaccine (which itself implies possible changes in the total sequence) does not necessarily affect the presence of a nuclear translocation signal (NTS). These are two different features in the protein. Bringing that up is CHAFF.

Notice that I am not backing down on the idea that data from the virus can and likely is predictive of the vaccines. I am just waiting for Taylor to assert openly that they are not.

Taylor, instead of challenging me, tries a very sneaky deflection.

This gets into bioinformatics. BLAST is a search engine of gene and protein sequences, which allows people to quickly find matching sequences – OR TO MISS THEM.

For sensitive operations, I simply don’t trust BLAST. It’s like Google. It’s a great place to look if you’re willing to throw your cares onto somebody else’s software, but it’s easy to miss things.

The SNEAKY move by Taylor is to MISLEAD me away from PRRARSV into a BAD SEARCH. The suggestion is to use an overly broad search of only 4 amino acids (682-683-684-685). Sorry, Charlie. No dice. I am interested in exactly what I said – PRRARSV – seven amino acids.

Instead, I decided to look for the sequences of the vaccines, and then use simple tools to check for the presence of the PRRARSV signal in them.

To begin with, note that there are TWO kinds of sequences I can potentially get for the vaccines.

  • the actual sequences, obtained by analyzing the vaccines
  • the “official” sequences, released by Pfizer and Moderna, the FDA, or somebody else

I tried to get official versions, but simply could not find them. So I found a link in the broader discussion of the results which Murakami was looking at.

The actual sequences are mentioned HERE:

LINK: https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/scientists-reverse-engineer-mrna-sequence-of-moderna-vaccine-68640

From there, I went to this link on GitHub, which contains IMAGES (not text) of the vaccine sequences.

LINK: https://github.com/NAalytics/Assemblies-of-putative-SARS-CoV2-spike-encoding-mRNA-sequences-for-vaccines-BNT-162b2-and-mRNA-1273/blob/main/Assemblies%20of%20putative%20SARS-CoV2-spike-encoding%20mRNA%20sequences%20for%20vaccines%20BNT-162b2%20and%20mRNA-1273.docx.pdf

Here is the Pfizer vaccine sequence, as an image:

The first thing you will note is that this is not likely to contain PRRARSV in it, because it’s all G, T, C, and A, like GATTACA.


This code needs to be translated from DNA/RNA to AMINO ACID, and for that, I need TEXT – not an image. So I looked for a different GitHub upload of the data, with text instead of images, and I found one.

LINK: https://github.com/NAalytics/Assemblies-of-putative-SARS-CoV2-spike-encoding-mRNA-sequences-for-vaccines-BNT-162b2-and-mRNA-1273

This web page includes a link to the actual sequence data, as a “FASTA” file:

LINK: https://github.com/NAalytics/Assemblies-of-putative-SARS-CoV2-spike-encoding-mRNA-sequences-for-vaccines-BNT-162b2-and-mRNA-1273/blob/main/Figure1Figure2_032321.fasta

The sequence data is here:


Figure1_032321_Spike-encoding_contig_assembled_from_BioNTech/Pfizer_BNT-162b2_vaccine
GAGAATAAACTAGTATTCTTCTGGTCCCCACAGACTCAGAGAGAACCCGCCACCATGTTCGTGTTCCTGGTGCTGCTGCC
TCTGGTGTCCAGCCAGTGTGTGAACCTGACCACCAGAACACAGCTGCCTCCAGCCTACACCAACAGCTTTACCAGAGGCG
TGTACTACCCCGACAAGGTGTTCAGATCCAGCGTGCTGCACTCTACCCAGGACCTGTTCCTGCCTTTCTTCAGCAACGTG
ACCTGGTTCCACGCCATCCACGTGTCCGGCACCAATGGCACCAAGAGATTCGACAACCCCGTGCTGCCCTTCAACGACGG
GGTGTACTTTGCCAGCACCGAGAAGTCCAACATCATCAGAGGCTGGATCTTCGGCACCACACTGGACAGCAAGACCCAGA
GCCTGCTGATCGTGAACAACGCCACCAACGTGGTCATCAAAGTGTGCGAGTTCCAGTTCTGCAACGACCCCTTCCTGGGC
GTCTACTACCACAAGAACAACAAGAGCTGGATGGAAAGCGAGTTCCGGGTGTACAGCAGCGCCAACAACTGCACCTTCGA
GTACGTGTCCCAGCCTTTCCTGATGGACCTGGAAGGCAAGCAGGGCAACTTCAAGAACCTGCGCGAGTTCGTGTTTAAGA
ACATCGACGGCTACTTCAAGATCTACAGCAAGCACACCCCTATCAACCTCGTGCGGGATCTGCCTCAGGGCTTCTCTGCT
CTGGAACCCCTGGTGGATCTGCCCATCGGCATCAACATCACCCGGTTTCAGACACTGCTGGCCCTGCACAGAAGCTACCT
GACACCTGGCGATAGCAGCAGCGGATGGACAGCTGGTGCCGCCGCTTACTATGTGGGCTACCTGCAGCCTAGAACCTTCC
TGCTGAAGTACAACGAGAACGGCACCATCACCGACGCCGTGGATTGTGCTCTGGATCCTCTGAGCGAGACAAAGTGCACC
CTGAAGTCCTTCACCGTGGAAAAGGGCATCTACCAGACCAGCAACTTCCGGGTGCAGCCCACCGAATCCATCGTGCGGTT
CCCCAATATCACCAATCTGTGCCCCTTCGGCGAGGTGTTCAATGCCACCAGATTCGCCTCTGTGTACGCCTGGAACCGGA
AGCGGATCAGCAATTGCGTGGCCGACTACTCCGTGCTGTACAACTCCGCCAGCTTCAGCACCTTCAAGTGCTACGGCGTG
TCCCCTACCAAGCTGAACGACCTGTGCTTCACAAACGTGTACGCCGACAGCTTCGTGATCCGGGGAGATGAAGTGCGGCA
GATTGCCCCTGGACAGACAGGCAAGATCGCCGACTACAACTACAAGCTGCCCGACGACTTCACCGGCTGTGTGATTGCCT
GGAACAGCAACAACCTGGACTCCAAAGTCGGCGGCAACTACAATTACCTGTACCGGCTGTTCCGGAAGTCCAATCTGAAG
CCCTTCGAGCGGGACATCTCCACCGAGATCTATCAGGCCGGCAGCACCCCTTGTAACGGCGTGGAAGGCTTCAACTGCTA
CTTCCCACTGCAGTCCTACGGCTTTCAGCCCACAAATGGCGTGGGCTATCAGCCCTACAGAGTGGTGGTGCTGAGCTTCG
AACTGCTGCATGCCCCTGCCACAGTGTGCGGCCCTAAGAAAAGCACCAATCTCGTGAAGAACAAATGCGTGAACTTCAAC
TTCAACGGCCTGACCGGCACCGGCGTGCTGACAGAGAGCAACAAGAAGTTCCTGCCATTCCAGCAGTTTGGCCGGGATAT
CGCCGATACCACAGACGCCGTTAGAGATCCCCAGACACTGGAAATCCTGGACATCACCCCTTGCAGCTTCGGCGGAGTGT
CTGTGATCACCCCTGGCACCAACACCAGCAATCAGGTGGCAGTGCTGTACCAGGACGTGAACTGTACCGAAGTGCCCGTG
GCCATTCACGCCGATCAGCTGACACCTACATGGCGGGTGTACTCCACCGGCAGCAATGTGTTTCAGACCAGAGCCGGCTG
TCTGATCGGAGCCGAGCACGTGAACAATAGCTACGAGTGCGACATCCCCATCGGCGCTGGAATCTGCGCCAGCTACCAGA
CACAGACAAACAGCCCTCGGAGAGCCAGAAGCGTGGCCAGCCAGAGCATCATTGCCTACACAATGTCTCTGGGCGCCGAG
AACAGCGTGGCCTACTCCAACAACTCTATCGCTATCCCCACCAACTTCACCATCAGCGTGACCACAGAGATCCTGCCTGT
GTCCATGACCAAGACCAGCGTGGACTGCACCATGTACATCTGCGGCGATTCCACCGAGTGCTCCAACCTGCTGCTGCAGT
ACGGCAGCTTCTGCACCCAGCTGAATAGAGCCCTGACAGGGATCGCCGTGGAACAGGACAAGAACACCCAAGAGGTGTTC
GCCCAAGTGAAGCAGATCTACAAGACCCCTCCTATCAAGGACTTCGGCGGCTTCAATTTCAGCCAGATTCTGCCCGATCC
TAGCAAGCCCAGCAAGCGGAGCTTCATCGAGGACCTGCTGTTCAACAAAGTGACACTGGCCGACGCCGGCTTCATCAAGC
AGTATGGCGATTGTCTGGGCGACATTGCCGCCAGGGATCTGATTTGCGCCCAGAAGTTTAACGGACTGACAGTGCTGCCT
CCTCTGCTGACCGATGAGATGATCGCCCAGTACACATCTGCCCTGCTGGCCGGCACAATCACAAGCGGCTGGACATTTGG
AGCAGGCGCCGCTCTGCAGATCCCCTTTGCTATGCAGATGGCCTACCGGTTCAACGGCATCGGAGTGACCCAGAATGTGC
TGTACGAGAACCAGAAGCTGATCGCCAACCAGTTCAACAGCGCCATCGGCAAGATCCAGGACAGCCTGAGCAGCACAGCA
AGCGCCCTGGGAAAGCTGCAGGACGTGGTCAACCAGAATGCCCAGGCACTGAACACCCTGGTCAAGCAGCTGTCCTCCAA
CTTCGGCGCCATCAGCTCTGTGCTGAACGATATCCTGAGCAGACTGGACCCTCCTGAGGCCGAGGTGCAGATCGACAGAC
TGATCACAGGCAGACTGCAGAGCCTCCAGACATACGTGACCCAGCAGCTGATCAGAGCCGCCGAGATTAGAGCCTCTGCC
AATCTGGCCGCCACCAAGATGTCTGAGTGTGTGCTGGGCCAGAGCAAGAGAGTGGACTTTTGCGGCAAGGGCTACCACCT
GATGAGCTTCCCTCAGTCTGCCCCTCACGGCGTGGTGTTTCTGCACGTGACATATGTGCCCGCTCAAGAGAAGAATTTCA
CCACCGCTCCAGCCATCTGCCACGACGGCAAAGCCCACTTTCCTAGAGAAGGCGTGTTCGTGTCCAACGGCACCCATTGG
TTCGTGACACAGCGGAACTTCTACGAGCCCCAGATCATCACCACCGACAACACCTTCGTGTCTGGCAACTGCGACGTCGT
GATCGGCATTGTGAACAATACCGTGTACGACCCTCTGCAGCCCGAGCTGGACAGCTTCAAAGAGGAACTGGACAAGTACT
TTAAGAACCACACAAGCCCCGACGTGGACCTGGGCGATATCAGCGGAATCAATGCCAGCGTCGTGAACATCCAGAAAGAG
ATCGACCGGCTGAACGAGGTGGCCAAGAATCTGAACGAGAGCCTGATCGACCTGCAAGAACTGGGGAAGTACGAGCAGTA
CATCAAGTGGCCCTGGTACATCTGGCTGGGCTTTATCGCCGGACTGATTGCCATCGTGATGGTCACAATCATGCTGTGTT
GCATGACCAGCTGCTGTAGCTGCCTGAAGGGCTGTTGTAGCTGTGGCAGCTGCTGCAAGTTCGACGAGGACGATTCTGAG
CCCGTGCTGAAGGGCGTGAAACTGCACTACACATGATGACTCGAGCTGGTACTGCATGCACGCAATGCTAGCTGCCCCTT
TCCCGTCCTGGGTACCCCGAGTCTCCCCCGACCTCGGGTCCCAGGTATGCTCCCACCTCCACCTGCCCCACTCACCACCT
CTGCTAGTTCCAGACACCTCCCAAGCACGCAGCAATGCAGCTCAAAACGCTTAGCCTAGCCACACCCCCACGGGAAACAG
CAGTGATTAACCTTTAGCAATAAACGAAAGTTTAACTAAGCTATACTAACCCCAGGGTTGGTCAATTTCGTGCCAGCCAC
ACCCTGGAGCTAGCA

Figure_2_32321_Spike-encoding_contig_assembled_from_Moderna_mRNA-1273_vaccine
GGGAAATAAGAGAGAAAAGAAGAGTAAGAAGAAATATAAGACCCCGGCGCCGCCACCATGTTCGTGTTCCTGGTGCTGCT
GCCCCTGGTGAGCAGCCAGTGCGTGAACCTGACCACCCGGACCCAGCTGCCACCAGCCTACACCAACAGCTTCACCCGGG
GCGTCTACTACCCCGACAAGGTGTTCCGGAGCAGCGTCCTGCACAGCACCCAGGACCTGTTCCTGCCCTTCTTCAGCAAC
GTGACCTGGTTCCACGCCATCCACGTGAGCGGCACCAACGGCACCAAGCGGTTCGACAACCCCGTGCTGCCCTTCAACGA
CGGCGTGTACTTCGCCAGCACCGAGAAGAGCAACATCATCCGGGGCTGGATCTTCGGCACCACCCTGGACAGCAAGACCC
AGAGCCTGCTGATCGTGAATAACGCCACCAACGTGGTGATCAAGGTGTGCGAGTTCCAGTTCTGCAACGACCCCTTCCTG
GGCGTGTACTACCACAAGAACAACAAGAGCTGGATGGAGAGCGAGTTCCGGGTGTACAGCAGCGCCAACAACTGCACCTT
CGAGTACGTGAGCCAGCCCTTCCTGATGGACCTGGAGGGCAAGCAGGGCAACTTCAAGAACCTGCGGGAGTTCGTGTTCA
AGAACATCGACGGCTACTTCAAGATCTACAGCAAGCACACCCCAATCAACCTGGTGCGGGATCTGCCCCAGGGCTTCTCA
GCCCTGGAGCCCCTGGTGGACCTGCCCATCGGCATCAACATCACCCGGTTCCAGACCCTGCTGGCCCTGCACCGGAGCTA
CCTGACCCCAGGCGACAGCAGCAGCGGGTGGACAGCAGGCGCGGCTGCTTACTACGTGGGCTACCTGCAGCCCCGGACCT
TCCTGCTGAAGTACAACGAGAACGGCACCATCACCGACGCCGTGGACTGCGCCCTGGACCCTCTGAGCGAGACCAAGTGC
ACCCTGAAGAGCTTCACCGTGGAGAAGGGCATCTACCAGACCAGCAACTTCCGGGTGCAGCCCACCGAGAGCATCGTGCG
GTTCCCCAACATCACCAACCTGTGCCCCTTCGGCGAGGTGTTCAACGCCACCCGGTTCGCCAGCGTGTACGCCTGGAACC
GGAAGCGGATCAGCAACTGCGTGGCCGACTACAGCGTGCTGTACAACAGCGCCAGCTTCAGCACCTTCAAGTGCTACGGC
GTGAGCCCCACCAAGCTGAACGACCTGTGCTTCACCAACGTGTACGCCGACAGCTTCGTGATCCGTGGCGACGAGGTGCG
GCAGATCGCACCCGGCCAGACAGGCAAGATCGCCGACTACAACTACAAGCTGCCCGACGACTTCACCGGCTGCGTGATCG
CCTGGAACAGCAACAACCTCGACAGCAAGGTGGGCGGCAACTACAACTACCTGTACCGGCTGTTCCGGAAGAGCAACCTG
AAGCCCTTCGAGCGGGACATCAGCACCGAGATCTACCAAGCCGGCTCCACCCCTTGCAACGGCGTGGAGGGCTTCAACTG
CTACTTCCCTCTGCAGAGCTACGGCTTCCAGCCCACCAACGGCGTGGGCTACCAGCCCTACCGGGTGGTGGTGCTGAGCT
TCGAGCTGCTGCACGCCCCAGCCACCGTGTGTGGCCCCAAGAAGAGCACCAACCTGGTGAAGAACAAGTGCGTGAACTTC
AACTTCAACGGCCTTACCGGCACCGGCGTGCTGACCGAGAGCAACAAGAAATTCCTGCCCTTTCAGCAGTTCGGCCGGGA
CATCGCCGACACCACCGACGCTGTGCGGGATCCCCAGACCCTGGAGATCCTGGACATCACCCCTTGCAGCTTCGGCGGCG
TGAGCGTGATCACCCCAGGCACCAACACCAGCAACCAGGTGGCCGTGCTGTACCAGGACGTGAACTGCACCGAGGTGCCC
GTGGCCATCCACGCCGACCAGCTGACACCCACCTGGCGGGTCTACAGCACCGGCAGCAACGTGTTCCAGACCCGGGCCGG
TTGCCTGATCGGCGCCGAGCACGTGAACAACAGCTACGAGTGCGACATCCCCATCGGCGCCGGCATCTGTGCCAGCTACC
AGACCCAGACCAATTCACCCCGGAGGGCAAGGAGCGTGGCCAGCCAGAGCATCATCGCCTACACCATGAGCCTGGGCGCC
GAGAACAGCGTGGCCTACAGCAACAACAGCATCGCCATCCCCACCAACTTCACCATCAGCGTGACCACCGAGATTCTGCC
CGTGAGCATGACCAAGACCAGCGTGGACTGCACCATGTACATCTGCGGCGACAGCACCGAGTGCAGCAACCTGCTGCTGC
AGTACGGCAGCTTCTGCACCCAGCTGAACCGGGCCCTGACCGGCATCGCCGTGGAGCAGGACAAGAACACCCAGGAGGTG
TTCGCCCAGGTGAAGCAGATCTACAAGACCCCTCCCATCAAGGACTTCGGCGGCTTCAACTTCAGCCAGATCCTGCCCGA
CCCCAGCAAGCCCAGCAAGCGGAGCTTCATCGAGGACCTGCTGTTCAACAAGGTGACCCTAGCCGACGCCGGCTTCATCA
AGCAGTACGGCGACTGCCTCGGCGACATAGCCGCCCGGGACCTGATCTGCGCCCAGAAGTTCAACGGCCTGACCGTGCTG
CCTCCCCTGCTGACCGACGAGATGATCGCCCAGTACACCAGCGCCCTGTTAGCCGGAACCATCACCAGCGGCTGGACTTT
CGGCGCTGGAGCCGCTCTGCAGATCCCCTTCGCCATGCAGATGGCCTACCGGTTCAACGGCATCGGCGTGACCCAGAACG
TGCTGTACGAGAACCAGAAGCTGATCGCCAACCAGTTCAACAGCGCCATCGGCAAGATCCAGGACAGCCTGAGCAGCACC
GCTAGCGCCCTGGGCAAGCTGCAGGACGTGGTGAACCAGAACGCCCAGGCCCTGAACACCCTGGTGAAGCAGCTGAGCAG
CAACTTCGGCGCCATCAGCAGCGTGCTGAACGACATCCTGAGCCGGCTGGACCCTCCCGAGGCCGAGGTGCAGATCGACC
GGCTGATCACTGGCCGGCTGCAGAGCCTGCAGACCTACGTGACCCAGCAGCTGATCCGGGCCGCCGAGATTCGGGCCAGC
GCCAACCTGGCCGCCACCAAGATGAGCGAGTGCGTGCTGGGCCAGAGCAAGCGGGTGGACTTCTGCGGCAAGGGCTACCA
CCTGATGAGCTTTCCCCAGAGCGCACCCCACGGAGTGGTGTTCCTGCACGTGACCTACGTGCCCGCCCAGGAGAAGAACT
TCACCACCGCCCCAGCCATCTGCCACGACGGCAAGGCCCACTTTCCCCGGGAGGGCGTGTTCGTGAGCAACGGCACCCAC
TGGTTCGTGACCCAGCGGAACTTCTACGAGCCCCAGATCATCACCACCGACAACACCTTCGTGAGCGGCAACTGCGACGT
GGTGATCGGCATCGTGAACAACACCGTGTACGATCCCCTGCAGCCCGAGCTGGACAGCTTCAAGGAGGAGCTGGACAAGT
ACTTCAAGAATCACACCAGCCCCGACGTGGACCTGGGCGACATCAGCGGCATCAACGCCAGCGTGGTGAACATCCAGAAG
GAGATCGATCGGCTGAACGAGGTGGCCAAGAACCTGAACGAGAGCCTGATCGACCTGCAGGAGCTGGGCAAGTACGAGCA
GTACATCAAGTGGCCCTGGTACATCTGGCTGGGCTTCATCGCCGGCCTGATCGCCATCGTGATGGTGACCATCATGCTGT
GCTGCATGACCAGCTGCTGCAGCTGCCTGAAGGGCTGTTGCAGCTGCGGCAGCTGCTGCAAGTTCGACGAGGACGACAGC
GAGCCCGTGCTGAAGGGCGTGAAGCTGCACTACACCTGATAATAGGCTGGAGCCTCGGTGGCCTAGCTTCTTGCCCCTTG
GGCCTCCCCCCAGCCCCTCCTCCCCTTCCTGCACCCGTACCCCCGTGGTCTTTGAATAAAGTCTGAGTGGGCGGCAAAAA
AAAA


From there, I merely needed a translator, which is a relatively simple tool, and which can be found on the web, such as here:

LINK: https://web.expasy.org/translate/

Plugging in the sequences from the paper on GitHub, it’s straightforward. Here are the two vaccines, translated to amino acids, as both images and text.


Pfizer:

ENKLVFFWSPQTQREPATMFVFLVLLPLVSSQCVNLTTRTQLPPAYTNSFTRGVYYPDKVFRSSVLHSTQDLFLPFFSNVTWFHAIHVSGTNGTKRFDNPVLPFNDGVYFASTEKSNIIRGWIFGTTLDSKTQSLLIVNNATNVVIKVCEFQFCNDPFLGVYYHKNNKSWMESEFRVYSSANNCTFEYVSQPFLMDLEGKQGNFKNLREFVFKNIDGYFKIYSKHTPINLVRDLPQGFSALEPLVDLPIGINITRFQTLLALHRSYLTPGDSSSGWTAGAAAYYVGYLQPRTFLLKYNENGTITDAVDCALDPLSETKCTLKSFTVEKGIYQTSNFRVQPTESIVRFPNITNLCPFGEVFNATRFASVYAWNRKRISNCVADYSVLYNSASFSTFKCYGVSPTKLNDLCFTNVYADSFVIRGDEVRQIAPGQTGKIADYNYKLPDDFTGCVIAWNSNNLDSKVGGNYNYLYRLFRKSNLKPFERDISTEIYQAGSTPCNGVEGFNCYFPLQSYGFQPTNGVGYQPYRVVVLSFELLHAPATVCGPKKSTNLVKNKCVNFNFNGLTGTGVLTESNKKFLPFQQFGRDIADTTDAVRDPQTLEILDITPCSFGGVSVITPGTNTSNQVAVLYQDVNCTEVPVAIHADQLTPTWRVYSTGSNVFQTRAGCLIGAEHVNNSYECDIPIGAGICASYQTQTNSPRRARSVASQSIIAYTMSLGAENSVAYSNNSIAIPTNFTISVTTEILPVSMTKTSVDCTMYICGDSTECSNLLLQYGSFCTQLNRALTGIAVEQDKNTQEVFAQVKQIYKTPPIKDFGGFNFSQILPDPSKPSKRSFIEDLLFNKVTLADAGFIKQYGDCLGDIAARDLICAQKFNGLTVLPPLLTDEMIAQYTSALLAGTITSGWTFGAGAALQIPFAMQMAYRFNGIGVTQNVLYENQKLIANQFNSAIGKIQDSLSSTASALGKLQDVVNQNAQALNTLVKQLSSNFGAISSVLNDILSRLDPPEAEVQIDRLITGRLQSLQTYVTQQLIRAAEIRASANLAATKMSECVLGQSKRVDFCGKGYHLMSFPQSAPHGVVFLHVTYVPAQEKNFTTAPAICHDGKAHFPREGVFVSNGTHWFVTQRNFYEPQIITTDNTFVSGNCDVVIGIVNNTVYDPLQPELDSFKEELDKYFKNHTSPDVDLGDISGINASVVNIQKEIDRLNEVAKNLNESLIDLQELGKYEQYIKWPWYIWLGFIAGLIAIVMVTIMLCCMTSCCSCLKGCCSCGSCCKFDEDDSEPVLKGVKLHYT–LELVLHARNASCPFPVLGTPSLPRPRVPGMLPPPPAPLTTSASSRHLPSTQQCSSKRLA-PHPHGKQQ-LTFSNKRKFN-AILTPGLVNFVPATPWS-


Moderna

GK-ERKEE-EEI-DPGAATMFVFLVLLPLVSSQCVNLTTRTQLPPAYTNSFTRGVYYPDKVFRSSVLHSTQDLFLPFFSNVTWFHAIHVSGTNGTKRFDNPVLPFNDGVYFASTEKSNIIRGWIFGTTLDSKTQSLLIVNNATNVVIKVCEFQFCNDPFLGVYYHKNNKSWMESEFRVYSSANNCTFEYVSQPFLMDLEGKQGNFKNLREFVFKNIDGYFKIYSKHTPINLVRDLPQGFSALEPLVDLPIGINITRFQTLLALHRSYLTPGDSSSGWTAGAAAYYVGYLQPRTFLLKYNENGTITDAVDCALDPLSETKCTLKSFTVEKGIYQTSNFRVQPTESIVRFPNITNLCPFGEVFNATRFASVYAWNRKRISNCVADYSVLYNSASFSTFKCYGVSPTKLNDLCFTNVYADSFVIRGDEVRQIAPGQTGKIADYNYKLPDDFTGCVIAWNSNNLDSKVGGNYNYLYRLFRKSNLKPFERDISTEIYQAGSTPCNGVEGFNCYFPLQSYGFQPTNGVGYQPYRVVVLSFELLHAPATVCGPKKSTNLVKNKCVNFNFNGLTGTGVLTESNKKFLPFQQFGRDIADTTDAVRDPQTLEILDITPCSFGGVSVITPGTNTSNQVAVLYQDVNCTEVPVAIHADQLTPTWRVYSTGSNVFQTRAGCLIGAEHVNNSYECDIPIGAGICASYQTQTNSPRRARSVASQSIIAYTMSLGAENSVAYSNNSIAIPTNFTISVTTEILPVSMTKTSVDCTMYICGDSTECSNLLLQYGSFCTQLNRALTGIAVEQDKNTQEVFAQVKQIYKTPPIKDFGGFNFSQILPDPSKPSKRSFIEDLLFNKVTLADAGFIKQYGDCLGDIAARDLICAQKFNGLTVLPPLLTDEMIAQYTSALLAGTITSGWTFGAGAALQIPFAMQMAYRFNGIGVTQNVLYENQKLIANQFNSAIGKIQDSLSSTASALGKLQDVVNQNAQALNTLVKQLSSNFGAISSVLNDILSRLDPPEAEVQIDRLITGRLQSLQTYVTQQLIRAAEIRASANLAATKMSECVLGQSKRVDFCGKGYHLMSFPQSAPHGVVFLHVTYVPAQEKNFTTAPAICHDGKAHFPREGVFVSNGTHWFVTQRNFYEPQIITTDNTFVSGNCDVVIGIVNNTVYDPLQPELDSFKEELDKYFKNHTSPDVDLGDISGINASVVNIQKEIDRLNEVAKNLNESLIDLQELGKYEQYIKWPWYIWLGFIAGLIAIVMVTIMLCCMTSCCSCLKGCCSCGSCCKFDEDDSEPVLKGVKLHYT—AGASVA-LLAPWASPQPLLPFLHPYPRGL-IKSEWAAKK


In each vaccine, there is one and only one instance of the full PRRARSV nuclear translocation signal mentioned by Mehedi, which I have marked in BOLD.


So what does all this mean?

This means that there is no question – the same nuclear translocation signal which gets natural spike protein into the cell nucleus, and natural spike protein messenger RNA into the nucleus, BOTH as demonstrated by Mehedi, is in the vaccine spike proteins.

Do I have to spell it out any more than that? Are the members of the Pfizer Defense Legion so incurious as to what this might mean, that they have to fight the obvious truth every step of the way?

Watch what happens next.


Taylor’s response was interesting, and I didn’t expect it.

This response actually set me up to explain why the binding site issue is largely irrelevant. First my reply, then the explanation.

TRANSLATION: Even if the vaccine-produced spike protein is “inactivated” toward some unspecified binding interaction in some unspecified way [which is contrary to the use of the largely unchanged full spike protein for immunogenic reasons, but let’s just ignore that point], so that the spike does not engage in some alleged “binding” in some way [I provide a plausible example], it doesn’t mean that the spike is not doing exactly what the viral spike has been proven to do, in terms of getting into the cell nucleus, AND bringing in its own mRNA at the same time.

Twitter’s character limits forced me to make that reply too jargon-filled for most, and possibly even for Taylor, who seemed not to have understood the full life cycle of the vaccine.

Allow me to explain in even more detail what I said, which was designed to clarify the issue for Taylor.

Let’s assume that the vaccine spike is somehow “inactivated” in its interaction with cell surface receptors. This would mean that new vaccine spike created by cells, would not interact with new cells in the same way as new disease spike protein, whether that spike was alone or part of a virus particle. I refer to that as “secondary toxicity”.

What I’m pointing out is that this is irrelevant to a “primary” toxicity concern – in fact a “genotoxicity”. This is the risk that spike protein produced in a cell, due to that cell ingesting a lipid nanoparticle of vaccine, might then get into the nucleus, and change the nature of that cell in a more fundamental way.

Now it is understood that the vaccine is “supposed to” lead to the death of infected cells, when those cells produce a bunch of spike protein, and are attacked by the immune system. The problem is that this doesn’t always happen, and indeed may not even be the primary fate of cells which take in the vaccine nanoparticles. What happens if the bell curve of vaccine intake creates a large number of cells which are damaged but not dead – which are not cleaned up by the immune system – and which have injured nuclei? There are lots of ways for things to go wrong.

What I am basically saying is that if the Mehedi results apply to vaccinated cells that are not cleaned up, we have a “bad cell problem”, and the problem isn’t just the spike – it’s in the nucleus. The cell’s problems have just become more “permanent”.

And that’s where things are. That fight is over, but I’m fighting over the De Marinis paper on another part of Twitter. That one is interesting, too.

STAY TUNED FOR MORE.

W

Title: CAREY TREATMENT, THE ¥ Pers: COBURN, JAMES / AUBREY, SKYE ¥ Year: 1972 ¥ Dir: EDWARDS, BLAKE ¥ Ref: CAR019AF ¥ Credit: [ MGM / THE KOBAL COLLECTION ]

Dear KMAG: 20230130 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Bing Liu Murder Potentially Linked to PRRARSV Nuclear Translocation Signal in Spike Protein of COVID Vaccines

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.


This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And yes, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get through it!!!

With a little help from our “friends in high places”!

Oh, yeah – we’re headed back to the WHITE HOUSE!

HANG ON for the ride of your life!


Dedication

Image: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d5/e5/ad/d5e5ad861f1fc08b93a6d511ed5ff19f.jpg

WHEATIE – OUR WARRIOR ANGEL

by Duchess01


Please forgive us, Wheatie, we did not know
That you had left us with armor in tow
We had no idea with what you dealt
We did not know the pain you felt
And now we can only imagine
With you what really did happen
Cause rarely did you complain 
And/or share your personal pain
Of one thing we are most certain
You are flying high behind the curtain
Watching over us above the crowds
Our Warrior Angel above the clouds
Thank You, Wheatie, for caring for us
While you were here among the fuss
We miss you dear you have no idea
Since time began in the pangaea
With you there was no time
In your wisdom you would chime
To clarify and magnify
The what where how and why
We did not question when you left
We were not slightly bereft
But over time we wondered why
You did not at least stop by
Now we know where you have gone
With the break of this new dawn
We could be angry but are not
Tho with an arrow we’ve been shot
Rest peacefully Warrior Angel dear
Send us a sign that you are near
A butterfly a flower a kiss of rain
From your love do not refrain
God sends Angels to watch over us
And now we have an Angel Plus
A Warrior Angel of Magnificence
From today and forward hence

LINK: https://www.theqtree.com/2019/05/23/the-poetry-tree/comment-page-2/#comment-917655

Our heroine in high definition!


The Rules

TL;DR –

Wheatie’s Rules:

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.


MINOR CHANGE NUMBER 1

Never talk about committing violence in a reply to Wolf or in response to anything Wolf has said, or you may get put into moderation so that your comments can be screened. This is ONLY because DHS is now playing door-knock Gestapo with people who have spoken at school board meetings, made public comments, etc. DHS regime jackboots are knocking on doors of school board mama bears and stupidly insinuating potential violence from things people say or don’t say on social media. A guy in Ohio pointed his FINGER at the school board, and they went after him, armed with pictures of the pointing, and screen captures of online comments. Yeah.

SO – give the Nazis ZERO ammo. Keep any mention of violence, even joking, away from Wolf, so that he doesn’t have to “explain” humor to humorless jackboots who pretend not to know things.

As for discussion of “violent humor” among yourselves (e.g., “#TeamHeadsOnPikes”), just use whatever discretion you think is appropriate for yourselves. I will only put you in moderation if your comments create problems for ME or THIS SITE, but not if they only impact you.

YOU are responsible for your own comments, if they come knocking. YOUR choice. Just remember this…..

OTHER THAN THAT…….


The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

Bottom line – respect other people’s FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

Our only additional requirement is that you do so NICELY. Or at least try to make some effort in that direction.

SO….. [ENGAGE BOILERPLATE…..]

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

Those who cannot deal with this easy requirement will be forced to jump the hoops of moderation, so that specific comments impugning other posters and violating the minimal rules can be sorted out and tossed in the trash.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

That includes the life skill of just ignoring certain other posters.

We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).

We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”


A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

You may also pray for our nation, our world, and even our enemies.

A bit of a paraphrase, I’ll admit, but it makes a few key points!


Musical Interlude

In honor of dear Wheatie, we now present some music to soothe, inspire, invigorate, or relax.

Here is Wheatie’s selection from just over 2 years ago!

“For your listening enjoyment, I offer this uplifting composition from Andreas Kübler of Really Slow Motion, titled ‘Save Me’:”

Wheatietoo

LINK: https://www.theqtree.com/2021/01/25/20210125-joe-biden-didnt-win-daily-open-thread/


Call To Battle

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.


Bing Liu Murder Potentially Linked to PRRARSV Nuclear Translocation Signal in Spike Protein of COVID Vaccines

This is the weirdest set of “data joins” in my history of researching things, but it is all starting to make sense – so I’m going to invite you into the story.

The story starts recently, when this tweet appeared in my timeline:

Weirdly, I cannot find this tweet in context in Elena’s tweets or replies on Twitter. If you check out her Twitter, she is a solid retweeter of a lot of great stuff – but I have no clue where she found this.

Anyway, after I saw it, it led to THIS post:


Genomic DNA Incorporation of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Explained by Unique Hidden Key to Nucleus and Spike’s Surprising Ability to Transport mRNA

This is SO HUGE. I must explain this to you. TL;DR – The spike protein not only contains a special sequence that allows it into the cell nucleus – it also has an ability to bring its own spike mRNA sequence with it. Both features appear to be unique among coronaviruses. The features explain genomic …


If you have not read that, please at least read a bit of it, including the “TL;DR” part, so that you can make sense of the rest of THIS post.

I did some posting about this yesterday on Twitter. Surprisingly there was no traction. This thread still has barely over 100 views on the first tweet.

I moved from the normal posting strategy, to “replying to the bigs”. Same problem – no traction.

It’s even worse today. All day I have been trying to get people to pay attention to this, and my Tweets go nowhere. However, a few examples will show you the core message, almost better than a TL;DR would.

I dumped an entire thread on a long response to ChiefNerd…..

I started replying about this stuff everywhere!

I found ONE other person tweeting about the paper – and he had almost zero engagement. And I only found the guy because I searched on the special sequence, PRRARSV.

Eventually, I even tried “mystery” to get engagement, and to get past any censorship.

No dice.

Anyway, later, THIS happened with Aubergine, from my earlier speculation about a Codemonkey Tweet.

LONG THREAD.


SO – anyway – I started a thread on Twitter…..


[We will see where this goes today. I will add more thoughts as we go on. Publishing now, for the midnight unofficial deadline….]



Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day Year Week:


translocation

noun

  • a change of location.
  • a transfer of a chromosomal segment to a new position, especially on a nonhomologous chromosome. Also called chromosomal translocation.
  • a chromosomal segment that is translocated.

Sub-types:

  • chromosomal translocation: see above.
  • reciprocal translocation: balanced, 2-way exchanges of material between chromosomes.
  • non-reciprocal translocation: unbalanced, one-way movement between chromosomes.
  • Robertsonian translocation: a special type of chromosome rearrangement merging long arms of a chromosome and eliminating the short arms.
  • nuclear translocation: movement of genetic material into or out of the cell nucleus.

Used in an Abstract:

Although the S [spike] protein is a surface transmembrane type 1 glycoprotein, it has been predicted to be translocated into the nucleus due to the novel nuclear localization signal (NLS) “PRRARSV,” which is absent from the S protein of other coronaviruses. Indeed, S proteins translocate into the nucleus in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. S mRNAs also translocate into the nucleus. S mRNA colocalizes with S protein, aiding the nuclear translocation of S mRNA. While nuclear translocation of nucleoprotein (N) has been shown in many coronaviruses, the nuclear translocation of both S mRNA and S protein reveals a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2.

Shown in an Image:

Figure 4. Colocalization between S mRNA and S protein inside infected cells. The images (see Figure 3) were analyzed by using the surface rendering and colocalization features of IMARIS. S protein and S mRNA distribution and colocalization in the cytoplasm (top panel), on the nuclear surface (middle panel) and inside the nucleus (bottom panel). The specific region of colocalization is indicated by a white spot. Scale bar 0.5 μm.

ENJOY THE SHOW

Have another great week!

W

Omicron Ground Reports – What’s Your Story?

Now that the COVID psy-op is falling apart, and we are fully resistant, we’ve overcome the COVID psy-op (GOOD), and we’ve been battling elsewhere (GOOD), but we may have lost some of our razor-sharp focus on, and ass-covering knowledge of, how to deal with COVID, and to thereby not go down for the count when COVID comes our way (BAD) .

Two recent comments by Scott and Aubergine show that COVID is still circulating, and that we are surviving without the vaccines, thank you kindly, “Dr.” Fauci.

The deal is, Omicron is still out there. In fact, so is Delta.

https://nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/global/6m

You can see that Omicron is everywhere around the world, vaccinating people against Delta, but Delta and its “old school buddies” still persist in small measure.

SO – I want to help give everybody a BOOSTER of several things:

  • information
  • preventative knowledge
  • courage
  • resistance to psy-ops

Please put your most recent COVID observations and experiences HERE, so that they can be found easily in the future, for historical reference, AND so that you can share your experiences, thoughts, strategies, and tactics with your fellow QTreepers.

Likewise, if you have questions, curiosities, and concerns about COVID, this is an excellent place to get some replies.

Thanks!

W

Five Fast Omicron Facts You Can Send to Your Friends, Neighbors and Doctors

This is a quick update that is almost entirely GOOD NEWS, and that needs to SPREAD AROUND LIKE WILDFIRE – just like OMICRON.

I will try to be brief and only comment as needed.


1 – A Case of Omicron Treated With HCQ

Remember that case of COVID treated with ivermectin, that was published as a video, and which I basically transcribed for the readers here?


A Seven-Day Journey Through COVID-19 in Seven Minutes, Treated with Ivermectin

This is a great selfie video, done by a young lady with a glorious Southern accent, chronicling her week of COVID-19 and recovery, treated with ivermectin. It’s short – just under 7 minutes – but it captures a lot of information about symptoms and relief by the drug. I can’t embed the video here due …


I think it’s really helpful for people to see and hear the reality of an individual COVID case, to see what to expect. This kind of information can absolutely reduce unnecessary fears. It’s a real service, IMO.

Well, Omicron is here, and it got here VERY fast (more later). THANKFULLY, somebody who GOT IT took extremely good notes, and put them online.

Specifically, a medical doctor, Dr. Henry Smith, Jr., who has published on American Thinker, got the disease, treated it with hydroxychloroquine, and recovered VERY nicely.

His account of the disease is MUST READ material. It’s short – no excuses!

Plus, he’s a photographer, and has lots of nice pictures on his site.

LINK: https://henrysmithscottage.com/viral-post-december-23-2021-my-omicron-infection/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/Jm60C

No preview! Please visit his site. I left a comment there, letting him know about antihistamines, because this is something that can get past the “pharmacy gestapo” that Biden and CDC have created.

As Steve has noted here, the 2X dosage of modern, 2nd-gen antihistamines is quite safe, and his own doctor prescribed 4X dosages. This is completely analogous to doctor’s prescription of ibuprofen at 800 mg, which is 4X the OTC 1-pill dose.

I know that ivermectin is “all the rage”, but hydroxychloroquine is still an excellent drug to treat COVID, and I think it’s great to see it in use here. As I recently noted, I believe that none other than Bill Gates was behind the “take-down” of HCQ in the medical literature, via funding of studies designed to knee-cap it.

Dr. Smith comes to FIVE conclusions about Omicron, 3 being numbered, and 2 bonus thoughts after those, made post-illness, all of which I find excellent and agreeable. Please visit his post to see what they are.

OH – and his American Thinker article – a short but powerful post on the OBVIOUSNESS of the solution – natural immunity – entitled “Who Isn’t Getting Infected?”, is definitely worth reading as well.

LINK: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/12/who_isnt_getting_infected.html

It is absolutely wonderful to see doctors standing up to CDC myopia (or worse) now!

Hat tip to GA/FL for this tip!!!


2 – Graphic Views of Omicron Displacing Delta

The graph above – if you know how to read it right – is absolutely STUNNING.

The graph above is North America.

The graph is a screen capture from NextStrain, which keeps track of virus variants globally.

LINK: https://nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/global

What this graph shows, is NOT “itty bitty” Omicron (red) sneaking up on “big old” Delta (turquoise).

It shows – at the extreme right edge – Omicron SQUASHING the Delta empire like a BUG. At the very edge, Delta basically STOPS – as Omicron keeps moving to the right.

Let’s look at an earlier screen capture from NextStrain. This one is GLOBAL, on December 4.

Here, you see the same thing I described above, but you see it earlier, because it took a while for the variant to travel to America, where it would displace Delta. The GLOBAL data is already showing Delta getting walloped.

From this, you can tell that I just missed Omicron. I had Delta with Day 0 (first symptoms) on November 26, and was likely infected on November 22 (yeah, not a good day). Everything in America was still DELTA at that time.

This is more easily seen in another graph. Source HERE at CDC.

LINK: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions

Sadly, the current graphics will not archive properly.

As you can see, on 11/27/2021 in the United States, it was ALL DELTA. On 12/4, It was still almost all Delta. By 12/11, the United States was at over 10% Omicron, But ONE WEEK later, on 12/18, the USA was at

70% Omicron.

This is just INSTANT-FREAKIN’-TANEOUS.

Will it hit 100% Omicron?

Does it HAVE TO hit 100% Omicron to wipe out the nastier Delta?

Stay tuned….. for the next item.


3 – The Decline and Fall of the Omicron Variant

Hat tip to RF121 for this video, in which a South African engineering geek and university researcher, Pieter Streicher, who tracks and predicts COVID numbers, tells us what is going to happen to the Omicron variant, and is ALREADY happening in one of the “origin towns” in South Africa, where it is PAST THE PEAK.

I really recommend listening to this, because I am just grabbing a few things that caught my fancy. There is much, much more.

Streicher predicts that Omicron will PEAK and then DECLINE, leaving ultimately around 20% infected and recovered, maybe 30% tops.

It will NOT be a majority of the population.

Here is how Streicher’s predictions have been working so far:

Now – why would I trust this guy – and NOT the Imperial College guy who Bill Gates promoted?

YOU KNOW…..

THIS GUY.

Yeah, the guy who ignored his own lockdowns from dodgy overblown models, so he could do the old pokerino with another “damn near model”, Little Mrs. Rubylips, his married British intelligence handler mistress.

Well, Neil Ferguson’s predictions turned out to be WILDLY overblown.

Streicher, on the other hand, whose predicted curves and actual numbers you can see above, is predicting – at the PEAKS….

25-fold LOWER deaths for Omicron relative to Delta, and…..

6-fold LOWER ventilated hospital beds for Omicron vs. Delta.

SO – Untreated Omicron is NOT exactly free of risk, and we still need hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin to treat it.

AND – failing availability of those things, we need antihistamines and azithromycin – the Spanish protocol – implement widely, as I discussed earlier…..


The Zyrtec Rebellion

Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …


And if you doubt the utility of antihistamines against ALL variants of SARS-CoV-2, then you need the NEXT item to convince you otherwise.


4 – An Independent Discovery and Validation of Antihistamine Therapy for COVID-19 *and* for Both Long COVID and Genetic Vaccine Major Adverse Effects

THIS is worth getting the word out to doctors quickly. Hat tip to Gail Combs for bringing this critical video to my attention.

The antihistamine therapy for COVID-19 was independently discovered by a South African doctor, Dr. Shankara Chetty. Even more importantly, the doctor discovered the reasoning behind the therapy, and its applicability to both “long COVID” and vaccine side effects as well.

His REASONING is extremely convincing, and well-explained in the video.

This is a brilliant universal theory of severe COVID, long COVID, and vaccine side effects, which meshes quite perfectly with almost everything we know about SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.

Thus, we now have a universally available, over-the-counter treatment protocol for BOTH COVID and COVID vaccination side effects, the former of which was found to be 100% successful in TWO real-world studies, and which cannot be stopped by Fauci-controlled pharmacists or Gates-funded anti-studies.

This video is brilliant, because it really demonstrates how science is done, at the practicing level. A doctor and scientist, using observation and logic, figured out the antihistamine protocol BY REASONING FROM SYMPTOMS, rather than by observation of antihistamines as an accidentally useful therapy. Nevertheless, both independent discoveries confirm each other.

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LvZDx6gzbJeR/

LINK: https://youtu.be/0tgvE6fuWXY

Dr. Shankara Chetty used a very old FIRST-GENERATION antihistamine, promethazine, as his drug of treatment.

Based on this, our own group’s prediction that Benadryl – another first-generation antihistamine – would also work, is almost certainly correct.

I think this is a critical video for every doctor to watch. In fact, this might be a good one to send to YOUR doctor!


5 – Omicron Infection Amplifies Neutralizing Antibody Response To Delta Variant

Well, count this as good news. Hat tip to RF121 for tipping us to this one.

First on Twitter:

LINK: https://sigallab.net/

LINK: https://secureservercdn.net/50.62.198.70/1mx.c5c.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/MEDRXIV-2021-268439v1-Sigal.pdf

Check out some further tweets from Alex Sigal.

Here is the abstract of the preprint.


Omicron has been shown to be highly transmissible and have extensive evasion of neutralizing antibody immunity elicited by vaccination and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Omicron infections are rapidly expanding worldwide often in the face of high levels of Delta infections. Here we characterized developing immunity to Omicron and investigated whether neutralizing immunity elicited by Omicron also enhances neutralizing immunity of the Delta variant. We enrolled both previously vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the Omicron infection wave in South Africa soon after symptom onset. We then measured their ability to neutralize both Omicron and Delta virus at enrollment versus a median of 14 days after enrollment. Neutralization of Omicron increased 14-fold over this time, showing a developing antibody response to the variant. Importantly, there was an enhancement of Delta virus neutralization, which increased 4.4-fold. The increase in Delta variant neutralization in individuals infected with Omicron may result in decreased ability of Delta to re-infect those individuals. Along with emerging data indicating that Omicron, at this time in the pandemic, is less pathogenic than Delta, such an outcome may have positive implications in terms of decreasing the Covid-19 burden of severe disease.

Here are the critical points:

Importantly, there was an enhancement of Delta virus neutralization, which increased 4.4-fold.

The increase in Delta variant neutralization in individuals infected with Omicron may result in decreased ability of Delta to re-infect those individuals.


IMO, this is good news for people who are infected by Omicron. It is very likely that Omicron offers some real protection against Delta.

The degree of protection against Delta is roughly a THIRD of the degree of protection against Omicron itself which is afforded by infection with Omicron (4.4-fold vs. 14-fold). That’s still ballpark. Probably comparable to a Delta-specific vaccine.

Not bad at all, IMO. We’ll just have to see how real-world data pan out.


That’s all for now, but stay tuned.

Because YES – there’s MOAR.

W

John Fink, James Coburn, and Jennifer O’Neill having a meal in a scene from the film ‘The Carey Treatment’, 1972. (Photo by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Getty Images)

Ivermectin – The Preparation


OK, people. It is time for THE WOLF to GET PATTON ON YOUR ASSES.

As you may know, we now have many of our dear members actively fighting COVID-19, including one (gil00) in the hospital. Several have received Regeneron. Thus far, praise God, we have not lost anybody – and I intend to keep it that way.

For updates on the health of our members, we now have a dedicated thread, listed at the top of the sidebar. Feel free to record information there, including LINKS to comments from sick members in the daily threads.


QTreeper Health Updates

This is a new thread for QTreepers with health issues of ANY kind to keep us updated. I have absolutely no problem with people posting HERE, on the OPEN THREADS, or BOTH. You do what is right for you. We’re here for YOU. I want people to post wherever they feel most comfortable. I also …


We have also covered a specific case of ivermectin, used to treat COVID-19, with FANTASTIC RESULTS.


A Seven-Day Journey Through COVID-19 in Seven Minutes, Treated with Ivermectin

This is a great selfie video, done by a young lady with a glorious Southern accent, chronicling her week of COVID-19 and recovery, treated with ivermectin. It’s short – just under 7 minutes – but it captures a lot of information about symptoms and relief by the drug. I can’t embed the video here due …


We have had many, many, many discussions of how to obtain ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine – now for over a year.

MANY of our members have gotten a hold of one, two, or even THREE OR MORE forms or versions of drugs used to treat COVID-19. When I say that people have STASHES, I mean it. They have STASHES.

So the problem is not that people don’t have the means to treat or prevent the disease.

The problem is that people don’t ALWAYS have the WILL to begin treatment EARLY.

TREATING EARLY was GOD’S GIFT TO US through Doctor Zelenko. This MAN OF GOD realized that the most important way to fight COVID was to hit it EARLY and COMPREHENSIVELY.

At that time, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and zinc was the best combination.

Now, we realize that ivermectin can augment or substitute for hydroxychloroquine. We also understand that VITAMIN D is critical.

We further understand that simple antihistamines such as zyrtec, loratadine, and others can almost completely eliminate the deadly late phase complications of COVID-19 infection.


The Zyrtec Rebellion

Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …


SO – I am not going to recap any of that stuff. Likewise, I am not going to re-justify the use of ivermectin, and its GREAT results in India, Indonesia, Japan, Brazil, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and everywhere ELSE that is out of the reach of the Branch Covidian propaganda machine.

Instead, I want to do these things:

I want to make sure that everybody here:

  • HAS A PLAN
  • HAS ANTIGEN TEST KITS TO BEGIN THEIR PLAN
  • HAS A STASH THAT SUPPORTS THEIR PLAN
  • HAS ADVOCATES WHO WILL ASSIST THEIR PLAN
  • HAS HOSPITAL COMMS TO THIS SITE TO UPHOLD THEIR PLAN
  • HAS THE *WILL* TO WITHOUT HESITATION START THEIR PLAN
  • HAS THE *TRAINING* TO FEEL CONFIDENT IN THEIR PLAN

Are you all with me?

TRAINING is key. You are going to assemble a plan and then you are going to TRAIN FOR IT.

Some of this is going to involve helping you understand what COULD be in your stash, and what SHOULD be in your stash.

Now – this is a moving target, and I will be changing and updating the information that follows.

But right now, the MINIMUM that should be in your stash, should be vitamin D and zinc supplements, to prevent COVID-19. Next, you need OTC antihistamines – see the above post.

This is the BARE MINIMUM to save your life. If you have adequate Vitamin D and adequate zinc, and are deficient in neither, then you are VERY unlikely to die from COVID-19.

If you take antihistamines, and you take them IMMEDIATELY or even PREVENTATIVELY, you are even LESS LIKELY TO DIE.

If you have these things, and the WILL to take some of them as needed BEFORE you get COVID, and the WILL to take the others as needed IMMEDIATELY when you think or KNOW that you have COVID-19, you can almost guarantee that you will NOT DIE.

If you want to go further, you need to get ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine.

If you want to strike with maximum efficiency, so that you can take the drugs you need IMMEDIATELY, you also need antigen tests.

These are available from your local pharmacy now, or by mail order.

I will compile a list of URLs here, as an appendix, for you to get these things.

But right now, the main thing I want to do, is to DEBRIEF each of you on your stash and your level of preparation. Then, in the comments, we are going to TRAIN EACH OTHER on preparation and RAPID DEPLOYMENT at the first sign of COVID-19.

So JOIN ME in the comments, and TELL ME (as much as you feel comfortable doing) about your STASH, but FAR MORE IMPORTANTLY….

TELL ME ABOUT YOUR PLAN.

Those of you who have fought or ARE fighting COVID right now, are welcome to TELL or RE-TELL what you did, what you didn’t do, and what you wished you had done, or might have done better.

I want to get ALL OF THIS TREATMENT INFORMATION in one place. I will distill out the most important stuff, and put it in the post itself.

You could save a fellow member, and for each of them, you could save 10 lurkers.

DO IT! Who will be first?

W

Appendix – Sources for Therapeutics

I will add entries from comments below. Please help add to this list.

1. Welcome Healthcare

https://www.indiamart.com/welcomehealthcare/search.html?ss=ivermectin

This is a great outfit. They are very professional. You need to be prepared with an email address, a PayPal account, and a phone number for them to discuss what they have and what you need. They are friendly, competent, speak good English, and have reasonable prices.

You need to know in advance exactly what you want and how much of it you want. They will ship immediately. You will have product delivered in as little as 2 weeks, or as many as 6 weeks, thanks to supply chain issues, but you will be able to track your shipment.

They also have azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, doxycycline, steroids, and others. I do NOT recommend buying anything you are not VERY comfortable using, and which you don’t already know proper dosage and contraindications. Likewise, if you are not comfortable purchasing “global OTC medicines” from suppliers like this, and wish to only obtain medicines with a doctor’s prescription, then please seek those drugs through doctors listed below.

This method is not for sissies. I don’t want to talk you out of it, but you are buying real medicine and treating YOURSELF by general published medical recommendations. If that makes you nervous, then go the doctor route. But remember this.

Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin can SAVE YOUR LIFE.


2. Veterinary Supply Companies

https://www.tractorsupply.com/tsc/product/agrilabs-agri-mectin-1-injection-50-ml

https://www.tractorsupply.com/tsc/product/agrilabs-agri-mectin-1-injection-200-ml

https://www.calvetsupply.com/ivermectin-injection-1-50ml.html

https://upco.com/?s=ivermectin

Some people feel more comfortable this way. Not a problem if you do. These are quality drugs, suitable for human use.

Veterinary supply companies provide ivermectin as both the injectable form (1%) and the horse paste.

In BOTH cases, you want to take it ORALLY. You do not want to inject it. You just have to use the right amount, because you are not a horse, so you don’t need as much.

The horse paste is probably easier if you are more of a COOK, and the injectable is probably easier if you are more of a LAB RAT. We can work with you either way, to get what you need and to help you understand dosages.


3. FLCCC Alliance & Other Doctors’ Organizations

FLCCC Alliance

https://covid19criticalcare.com/guide-for-this-website/

Remote Health Solutions

https://rhsusa.com/

If you want to go through a doctor, these groups are how to do it.


4. Antigen Tests

https://www.cvs.com/shop/abbott-binaxnow-covid-19-antigen-self-test-2-tests-for-serial-testing-prodid-550147

The advantage of using antigen tests, is that you won’t waste your ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine on some cold or weak flu. You will KNOW that you have COVID, and you will be able to take your therapeutic in CONFIDENCE. Thus, if you are AMBIVALENT about taking ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine preventatively, then just wait until you have a positive antigen test, and THEN take the drugs, when you KNOW they will work.

With an antigen test, you can hit COVID on DAY ONE of the clinical infection.


5. Antibody / Regeneron / Lilly / MAb

Use these links to find infusion centers and information on availability.

https://covid.infusioncenter.org/

https://protect-public.hhs.gov/pages/therapeutics-distribution

In my opinion, you can HOPE for these treatments, but (1) there are no guarantees, and (2) you may prove not to be eligible for many reasons, EVEN if you try to get treatment within the first 10 days.

Don’t count on this method, is my advice. But DO make it part of your PLAN!

6. Moxidectin

This is an alternative to ivermectin, which are longer-lasting with completely different dosages. Be VERY careful if you investigate this therapeutic. IMO it is not nearly as well-understood as ivermectin as an antiviral or treatment for long-haul, but it has been clearly demonstrated as effective, IMO. If anybody has information from doctors about safe dosages of moxidectin in humans, please post it!

Moxidectin:

http://www.medchemexpress.com/moxidectin.html

Moxidectin cautions:

http://www.maximpulse.com/permethrin/moxidectin_01.html


7. Other Online Pharmacies (not verified)

https://pharma-doctor.com/ivermectin.html

https://drugsforhealth.org/product/Stromectol.html


8. Please Suggest MORE LINKS!


PS – Ivermectin vs. Pfizer’s New Drug Paxlovid

https://conservativeplaylist.com/2021/11/16/why-ivermectin-is-superior-to-pfizers-antiviral-pill/

Pfizer’s Drug: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/pfizer-will-seek-emergency-use-authorization-its-covid-19-antiviral

QTreeper Health Updates

This is a new thread for QTreepers with health issues of ANY kind to keep us updated. I have absolutely no problem with people posting HERE, on the OPEN THREADS, or BOTH. You do what is right for you. We’re here for YOU.

I want people to post wherever they feel most comfortable. I also want people to get updates in real time. BOTH this thread and the open thread will help accomplish that goal.

Thank you!!!

W

“You want ivermectin? Nurse Wolf says you GET ivermectin!”