“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
The above is a vintage image of mass vaccination. (Courtesy Google Images.)
This series on the disaster of the COVID-19 virus itself, and of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, is dedicated to the memory of Yours Truly’s cousin Bill, who “died suddenly and unexpectedly” in September 2023.
The origination of today’s post begins here: www.dossier.today/p/double-digits-biden-admin-tells-americans, “Double Digits: Biden Admin tells Americans that it’s soon time for their 10th Covid shot“, by Jordan Schachtel, 13 June 2024. (Mr. Schachtel wrote about the ninth COVID-19 “vaccine” injection here: www.dossier.today/p/dose-number-nine-cdc-panel-green, “Dose number NINE: CDC panel green lights yet another Covid mRNA shot“, 29 February 2024. The CDC recommended that persons over age 65 take another “booster shot” of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or of the Moderna “2023-2024 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” of these manufacturers.) A person age 65 or older, if that person adhered to every CDC recommendation regarding taking a COVID-19 “vaccine” injection since December 2020 (when the FDA granted first Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to Pfizer-BioNTech and to Moderna for these companies’ “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (BNT162b2 by Pfizer-BioNTech; and, mRNA-1273 by Moderna), would have taken injection number nine starting on 28 February 2024.
Today’s post is long. There is a large amount of information to “unpack.” Stay with me here.
Note the language regarding the “selection of a specific JN.1 lineage SARS-CoV-2 strain…” More about that later.
The trail behind the 5 June 2024 FDA announcement begins with the VRBPAC Briefing Document for the meeting held on 28 June 2022: www.fda.gov/media/159452/download, “FDA Briefing Document Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting June 28, 2022.” It was at this meeting that the FDA “codified” the types of “strain composition recommendations” that the agency would use regarding “new versions” of COVID-19 “vaccines.” Yours Truly presents page 17, page 18, and page 19 of this document:
It appears that the FDA simply decided that it would be permissible for the agency to authorize a new COVID-19 “vaccine” strain composition along what, in Yours Truly’s opinion, may be called “very flexible” options. For example, the Pfizer-BioNTech XBB.1.5 COVID-19 “vaccine”, which was FDA authorized in the fall of 2023, had test results only from mouse testing prior to FDA authorization. Following are: The link to the Pfizer-BioNTech slide presentation about this “vaccine” to the CDC’s ACIP committee (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) meeting of 12 September 2023; and, an image of slide CC4 from this presentation. First, the presentation: www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2023-09-12/10-COVID-Modjarrad-508.pdf.
Second, slide CC-4 from the above presentation:
The XBB.1.5. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” had only been given as a single injection to humans in the company’s clinical trial; a clinical trial which had only just begun prior to the ACIP meeting. Slide CC-5 of the presentation, the start of the company’s human trial of this “vaccine”, is below:
Slide CC-6 of the presentation has to do with the mouse studies of this “vaccine”, which were of longer duration.
Notwithstanding the above, the FDA authorized the use of the company’s XBB.1.5 COVID-19 “vaccine” on 11 September 2023 (in Yours Truly’s opinion, it appears that the ACIP meeting of 12 September 2023 was a “catch-up” formality.) It also appears (again, in Yours Truly’s opinion), that the FDA used a very loose interpretation of “Option 4” on page 18 of the FDA Briefing Document above in granting the EUA for this “vaccine”.
** Now, on to the latest “new version” of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines”, that the FDA authorized in June 2024.
The following linked items are important regarding background information related to this situation and to the FDA: First, the FDA document, stating that the agency would “align” its COVID-19 “vaccine” antigen composition to the recommendations of the World Health Organization’s TAG-CO-VAC recommendations: www.fda.gov/media/179139/download (the TAG-CO-VAC recommendation for the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccines” was to use the JN.1 strain); second, the FDA document regarding “considerations and recommendations” for the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” composition: www.fda.gov/media/179145/download; third, the FDA announcement of the 5 June meeting of its VRBPAC committee (Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.): www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-june-5-2024-meeting-announcement. From this last link, chick on “Event Materials” to see the slide presentations and other items that were discussed at this meeting.
Two important items from the “Event Materials” list: the FDA Briefing Document; and the VRBPAC roster for this meeting. First, the FDA Briefing Document: www.fda.gov/media/179003/download; and, second, the VRBPAC roster for this meeting: www.fda.gov/media/179225/download. The roster for the 5 June 2024 meeting has some “familiar” members and speakers: Paul Offit, MD; and Peter Marks, MD (director of CBER [Center for Biologics Evaluation the Research of the FDA]); and, among the “Temporary Voting Members”, are: Bruce Gellin, M.D., M. PH., the Chief of Global Public Health Strategy for the Rockefeller Foundation; and, Melinda Wharton, M.D., M. PH., Associate Director of Vaccine Policy of the CDC. (Italics mine)
The VRBPAC members voted unanimously to endorse the Pfizer-BioNTech, the Moderna, and the Novavax “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine” by these companies, based on the presentations of these companies’ representatives at the meeting. Yours Truly can find noregistered human clinical trials performed in advance of the 5 June VRBPAC meeting by Pfizer-BioNTech, or by Moderna, or by Novavax, for any “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine”; that would indicate that any “clinical trials” were performed in these companies’ facilities on mice; and that any “human trials” were also performed in these companies’ facilities, prior to the meeting. The FDA then issued the agency’s original announcement of 7 June 2024: www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-roundup-june-7-2024; and, a screenshot from this announcement:
Note in particular “…the selection of a specific JN.1 lineage SARS-CoV-2 strain (e.g., JN.1. or KP.2) and expressed a strong preference for JN.1.” Here’s where it starts to “get interesting.”
What was it that happened? Part of the answer lies in the fact that the NIH and Moderna co-own the patents (and, therefore, share the royalties) for the Moderna “flagship” modRNA COVID-19 “vaccine”, mRNA-1273. This agreement would extend to “descendant clone COVID-19 vaccines” by Moderna. www.citizen.org/article/modernas-mrna-1273-vaccine-patent-landscape/. The NIH’s Dale and Betty Bumpers Vaccine Research Center (part of NIAID — which Dr. Anthony Fauci led from November 1984 until his retirement in December 2022) and Moderna co-developed mRNA-1273. https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-stories/nih-vaccine-research-center; a screenshot from the article is below:
The other part of the answer is that Moderna was already developing a KP.2 strain COVID-19 “vaccine” for 2024-2025. This, and the FDA’s decision to shift away from the JN.1 strain to the KP.2 strain, are described in this post at Sasha Latypova’s blog: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/all-roads-lead-to-resilience, “All Roads lead to Resilience. FDA is removing competitors for the Pentagon & CIA’s baby…Moderna”, 23 June 2024.
However, there’s yet another detail in play here, regarding the FDA’s switch, “based on evaluation of the most recent circulating strains of COVID-19”, from JN.1 to KP.2 — the CIA and the Pentagon. Here is a screenshot from Sasha Latypova’s Substack article:
But wait, there’s more! Resilience lists multiple “partners”, such as the Mayo Clinic. The company also, apparently, has a “partnership” with the United States Army’s Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense https://resilience.com/learn/partnerships. Below is a screenshot from this website:
It appears, then, in Yours Truly’s opinion, that the FDA was perhaps “reminded” of the”details” regarding the NIH-Moderna co-ownership (and royalties – sharing) agreement related to Moderna’s modRNA COVID-19 “vaccines”; and, the role of the CIA-Pentagon-National Resilience (aka Resilience) in manufacturing the mRNA used in the Moderna COVID-19 Omicron “booster vaccines” — and the KP.2. strain is indeed a “descendant strain” in the Omicron lineage (as is the JN.1 strain.) Hence, the FDA’s 2024-2025 COVID-19 “vaccine” strain “sudden switch” announcement of 13 June 2024, only one week after the agency gave the nod to the JN.1 strain.
In Yours Truly’s opinion, it is statistically, medically, and ethically impossible for a new vaccine (let alone any COVID-19 “vaccine”) to be developed; tested (on lab animals, then on human subjects); the test data thoroughly collated and analyzed for “safety and efficacy” on both lab animals and on human subjects; then, which data is presented to the CDC / FDA for consideration; then, these agencies doing their own “due diligence” research; then, and only then, being granted an EUA by the FDA; then, and only then, manufactured for use in humans — in a time span of fewer than three to five years, let alone within a time span of only a few months. It appears, again in Yours Truly’s opinion, that the CDC and the FDA are playing “fast and loose” with the health and safety of the people who choose (or will be “mandated”) to take the “2024-2025 Formula COVID-19 Vaccine.” And, also, that “other entities” are in play here to perhaps “influence” decision making by these agencies.
All of above is in addition to the fact that the COVID-19 “vaccines” (actually, gene therapy injections) have caused, are causing, and will cause, multiple health issues, serious adverse reactions, and deaths, in those who are “vaccinated.” Just two of the most recent discoveries: One, the COVID-19 “vaccines” can cause brain damage, an article by Dr. William Makis: www.globalresearch.ca/brain-damage-covid-19-mrna-vaccines/5861012, “Brain Damage Caused by COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines”, 26 June 2024. Below is a screenshot from Dr. Makis’ article:
The second most recent discovery, that the COVID-19 “vaccines” reduce life expectancy (even in “all-cause” analysis) among COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons, by Dr. Peter A. McCullough: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-publication-a-critical-analysis, “BREAKING Publication — A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province”, 1 July 2024. The peer-reviewed paper is here: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071343, “A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province”, Marco Alessandria, et al., published 30 June 2024. Below is a screenshot from the Conclusions section of this paper:
In Yours Truly’ opinion, it is apparent at “half a glance” that the COVID-19 “vaccines” (actually, gene therapy injections) must be completely withdrawn for human use until these products have been fully investigated, and then re-designed, before being re-introduced for human use; and, that there is no “co-ownership” or sharing of royalties between a government agency and a COVID-19 “vaccine” manufacturer; and, that there is no involvement of the United States military in the development or manufacture of such products.
Risks, Bets, Rewards and Losses – Why Vaccine-Conferred and Disease-Conferred Immunity are Both Proper Personal Gambles When Choice is Free and Enough Truth is Known or Unknown
Many of us were shocked that President Trump just showed his “pro-vax” hand in an interview with vaxx nutt Bill O’Reilly, but if you watch Trump long enough, you realize that he very often gets to the optimal perspective before anybody else – even with incomplete data.
It’s worth wondering why Trump said what he said, and said it when he said it.
Beyond the “credit” issue – which I can really see for many reasons, not the least of which is because Trump’s plan really messed up the Cabal plans on COVID – I think Trump knows people who are seeing the emerging data. And I think they are advising him correctly.
I’m going to try to show you some of that data, and what it means.
Rand Paul is a sharp guy, too. Trump respects Rand Paul. It pays to ask why. I think that part of it is because Rand is a doctor. Trump respects doctors, I am convinced. And Trump knows that doctors differ in their opinions, like everybody else, and that he (Trump) needs to listen to a number of them, to see where the best perspective resides.
Rand is not anti-vaxx. He’s pro-natural-immunity. There is a difference.
At the place where Trump’s viewpoint and Rand Paul’s viewpoint intersect, you will find much truth. I certainly did. And when I added in a few other doctors “on our side”, and looked carefully at where I was skeptical of some of their thinking, but also let them convince me to be skeptical of some of my own thinking, I hit the jackpot.
BOTH the vaccines AND the disease make sense as alternative, risky, immunity-conferring antigens. Neither one is obviously superior to the other for everybody, because the landscape of risk and benefit is too complex, and depends far too much on the needs, goals, and medical circumstances of the individual. Worse still, past choices – including accidental ones – affect future choices.
Rand Paul saw right into this – that the CRUX of the problem is that “natural immunity” is being ignored by a monetarily, scientifically, and institutionally compromised medical establishment. Natural, disease-conferred immunity is the BEST CHOICE for many people – particularly when combined with a “delay of onset” strategy, and TREATMENT, which alters the risk/benefit. We have known this all along, yet we have never truly internalized it, because the “Let’s You And Him Fight” strategy of the OBAMA MANDATES has widened and deepened the division between those who choose vaccines and those who don’t.
AND LOGIC.
Trump GETS THIS. And he said so. We ARE falling into their trap. BUT we can turn that around on a DIME.
It is critical for our side – the free and sane medicine side – to EXPOSE and BASH the performance of the vaccines, because the other side won’t do it. But it is also critical that we STAND UP for the freedom for others to take those risky vaccines voluntarily, and accept the truth that it can make sense, during a period where we don’t know everything, and MAYBE beyond that, after we know more.
Mandates are absolutely stupid, reckless, and anti-science. They interfere with medicine. The mandating commies need to BTFO. But letting fearful people take a risky vaccine – a personal gamble – is a part of freedom that we have to respect.
I want to show you data that makes this make sense.
Some of you may be surprised that I am defending the COVID vaccines AT ALL. At present I have ZERO intention of taking one. For me, and my wife, they are a BAD medical choice. For many others, too.
Well, what if I tell you that in doing so, I can defend disease-conferred immunity EVEN MORE?
What if I tell you that I can now see why, strategically, Trump waited until we “knee-capped” – but didn’t kill – the vaccines?
BOTH SIDES HAD TO SEE MORE CLEARLY.
Let me help you see more clearly.
Natural Immunity – More Risk With More Reward?
What I just said there is not always true.
For CHILDREN, it appears that the vaccines are MORE RISK, LESS REWARD.
Yeah, Trump was right about that.
It’s a NO-BRAINER to NOT, NOT, NEVER, EVER give this shit to kids, and I personally hope that God himself does whatever is needed to save children from the MONSTERS who are injecting them with these RELATIVELY dangerous vaccines.
Kids are being deprived of EXCELLENT natural immunity, for JUNK immunity that makes money for Big Pharma.
Just for starters, we may be condemning these kids to a lifetime of life-robbing spike boosters, just by virtue of a well-understood idea of “original antigenic sin”, or OAS. OAS is where one antigen leads to an inappropriate response to a later antigen, vaccine, or infection.
This means that if we give children a misleading FIRST ANTIGENIC STIMULUS, they may then be STUCK with sub-optimal antibody immunity, leaving them for an unknown time at GREATER RISK from the disease. It may very well be that the BEST FIRST ANTIGEN for SARS-CoV-2 is the DISEASE – not a spike protein vaccine.
We don’t KNOW what will happen long-term when we inject kids. Or, at least, most of us don’t. Maybe Fauci does.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Is it a good idea? Should we bet ALL our kids on that idea?
NO FREAKING WAY.
And THAT is assuming that these vaccines do nothing to affect fertility. If they DO affect fertility, then this has to be made a KNOWN and ADMITTED risk, at the very least – not covered up, like it is right now.
A call for Nuremberg II, more likely, if this was knowingly advanced.
Who wants to risk their kids’ chance of having children?
This brings up the question of whether parents have the right to *knowingly* neuter their kids. Some parents already are, by “transing” kids. I think it’s pretty clear that’s where the Cabal is going – neutering and spaying humans. Interesting question. Should it be sent to SCOFFLAW SCOTUS? How is Amy Comey Barren going to vote on that one?
Asking for a FIEND.
I would even extend that thinking to teens and young adults. There is no reason that I can see to give them the vaccine. But should they have that choice, in consultation with their doctors? Interesting question. Very hard to reconcile a pro-life position with that, isn’t it?
But back to natural immunity.
Natural Immunity – More Rewards
Are there, in fact, more rewards?
I think so. Look at these two figures from the UK Ministry of Health, showing spike protein antibodies in people in England in 2021.
The darker the color, the stronger the antibodies.
The first graphs are people who have no evidence of having caught the disease (N protein negative). They include the unvaccinated uninfected and the vaccinated uninfected.
The yellow is the unvaccinated people who have not caught the disease – mostly kids.
Green, blue and purple are various levels of vaccination success – the darker, the more spike antibodies.
Now look at people who got some or all of their spike immunity by natural infection with the disease.
Assuming it’s a wash as far as the quality of the antibodies – which is not necessarily true – it’s obvious that these recoverees have a more robust spike antibody immunity – to say nothing of likely immunity to some or all of the other 20+ proteins in SARS-CoV-2.
Rand Paul, right here. The man is asking the right questions.
So why is Fauci ignoring this natural immunity stuff?
Notice that KIDS don’t mount a strong spike immunity, even though they beat down the disease in a hurry, with minimal symptoms. This is likely an EVOLVED RESPONSE – an EVOLVED STRATEGY – a form of EVOLVED INTELLIGENCE. What it says is that kids “know” by evolution – don’t build a lasting defense to the ever-changing spike protein. Meanwhile, the virus tries to “rope-a-dope” us slowly into concentrating on the spike as we age, misleading us with each attack. We lean on the crutch of spike antibodies that don’t work on the next strain, or actually make things worse.
Kinda funny that Fauci and the “follow the science” types don’t respect this signal from evolution, but whatever. That’s the basis of another post. But keep it in mind – it’s likely important.
So let us not digress.
The bottom line is that IF you’re going to make spike antibody immunity your standard of success, which Fauci and company clearly have, as part of Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis”, then by that standard, “natural immunity” from the disease gives MORE REWARD.
And again, I remind you, there are MANY other metrics of immunological success which are highly relevant, and which are ignored under Fauci spike antibody hypnosis. Always keep that in mind.
Natural Immunity – More Risks
SO – is the disease “more risk” to get that more reward?
My answer would be “maybe”.
It’s a complex calculation – particularly if you factor in “not getting the disease until you get it”. When you vaccinate, it’s a down payment in full, and with boosters, you’re even stuck with installments. You are “accepting that the risks happen” at 100%. Vaccination “collapses the probabilities”. But if you take your chances on the disease, by simply not vaccinating, you are delaying the (probably) higher risk, but the “risk over time” is substantially reduced.
Imagine the “payoff” of not vaccinating or getting the disease until Omicron. That would have been a GREAT gamble and winnings.
But let’s look at an ACTUAL COMPARATIVE RISK of vaccine vs. disease.
Now – let me be clear from the start – this article is a CLICK-BAIT CHERRY-PICKING of the highest order. The title numbers SEEM shocking – until you dig into it, and go to the source.
But still, they’re not “lying”. It’s just misguided. But that CHAFF led me to WHEAT.
Let me include the entire, short report, as it appeared in GWP.
On December 14th, 2021, Nature Medicine released a study based on a broad population data set analyzed by researchers at Oxford University. The researchers examined the risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination and infection.
The Oxford researchers reveal that 1 in 100 or 1% of all vaccinated individuals were admitted to the hospital or died with arrhythmia or irregular heartbeat.
Of the 38,615,491 vaccinated individuals included in our study, 385,508 (1.0%) were admitted to hospital with or died from cardiac arrhythmia at any time in the study period (either before or after vaccination); 86,754 (0.2%) of these occurred in the 1-28 days after any dose of vaccine. Of those who were admitted or died 39,897 (10.3%) had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test, with 29,694 (7.7%) having a positive test before vaccination. There were 7,795 deaths with cardiac arrhythmia recorded as the cause of death (1,108 had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test).
So 1 in 100 of the vaccinated individuals are going to the hospital with irregular heart beat and this isn’t international headlines?
This study appeared in the journal NATURE. That is the big leagues. We have to take this seriously. But let’s look at it closely. It REALLY helps to see that entire document, although SUSPICIOUS CAT should come out, just looking at the TITLE.
Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection
See? This isn’t just about the vaccines – it looks at infection, too. Is Gateway Pundit giving us the full story? Maybe not.
ABSTRACT:
Although myocarditis and pericarditis were not observed as adverse events in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine trials, there have been numerous reports of suspected cases following vaccination in the general population. We undertook a self-controlled case series study of people aged 16 or older vaccinated for COVID-19 in England between 1 December 2020 and 24 August 2021 to investigate hospital admission or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias in the 1–28 days following adenovirus (ChAdOx1, n = 20,615,911) or messenger RNA-based (BNT162b2, n = 16,993,389; mRNA-1273, n = 1,006,191) vaccines or a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive test (n = 3,028,867). We found increased risks of myocarditis associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 vaccines and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine over the 1–28 days postvaccination period, and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3), one (95% CI 0, 2) and six (95% CI 2, 8) myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively, in the 28 days following a first dose and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273. This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41) myocarditis events per 1 million patients in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We also observed increased risks of pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Similar associations were not observed with any of the COVID-19 vaccines, apart from an increased risk of arrhythmia following a second dose of mRNA-1273. Subgroup analyses by age showed the increased risk of myocarditis associated with the two mRNA vaccines was present only in those younger than 40.
The TRUTH is right in there.
First, we have to remember that GWP was concentrating on 1% of vaccinated people during the study period, INCLUDING before they got vaccinated, going to the hospital for or dying from a cardiac arrhythmia. That “before they got vaccinated” point is a TIP, right there, that we really need to consider the risk for UNVACCINATED people, too – including these very same people – for comparison. And as an aside, what is the number for corresponding unvaccinated people? You can almost guess that for most old people, it’s gonna be – well – maybe 1%?
And indeed, when the researchers compared the risk of an “event” against the risks of these patients BEFORE vaccination, they got their answers.
The WORST CASE for the vaccines was myocarditis. So let’s look at that, first.
Here is the risk from the vaccines. Broken out with [notations] so it’s easy to understand.
We found increased risks of myocarditis …
associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 [AstraZeneca] and BNT162b2 [Pfizer] vaccines
and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 [Moderna] vaccine
over the 1–28 days postvaccination period,
and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. [STRONGLY NOTE THIS!!!]
We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3),
one (95% CI 0, 2)
and six (95% CI 2, 8)
myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively,
in the 28 days following a first dose
and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million
vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273.
SO – this confirms what we know. The vaccines cause myocarditis. It’s a RISK. It’s a handful or two in a million, per injection.
But now, let’s look at the NEXT LINE.
This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41)
myocarditis events per 1 million patients
in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test.
What this says TO ME is that the risk of this one heart problem, in a vaccine that gives less immunity, is a significant fraction of the same risk from the disease.
Obviously due to the SPIKE PROTEIN, and possibly with a simple correlation to exposure.
I will admit that it’s LESS RISK from the vaccines, but not all that much.
Look at MODERNA.
The compiled risk of myocarditis from the TWO SHOTS (6+10 = 16) is 40% of the disease risk (40).
And yet HERE is how the authors have to word things to get it past the referees and editors.
“In summary, this population-based study quantifies for the first time the risk of several rare cardiac adverse events associated with three COVID-19 vaccines as well as SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in adults was associated with a small increase in the risk of myocarditis within a week of receiving the first dose of both adenovirus and mRNA vaccines, and after the second dose of both mRNA vaccines. By contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a substantial increase in the risk of hospitalization or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmia.“
They played a lot of word games there – take it from a retired scientist. They are also STUDIOUSLY AVOIDING some big stories that would rub the industry wrong.
“Give the editors what they want.”
Now, before I examine that conclusion for further trickery on the “within a week” qualifier and several other points (not today), I just want to say that calling 16 “small” and 40 “substantial” is bullshit.
Author bias, implicit or imposed, as a virtue signal to Bill Gates’ “vaccine culture” in science.
I will bet MONEY that a third Moderna booster would come in at 14 or more, bringing the total myocarditis events from chronic spike protein exposure to 30 or more, AND at the 4th injection SURPASSING the risk of ONE untreated disease incidence.
Well, is it worth it?
I don’t want Dementia Joe telling ME that it’s worth it. I want to make that determination MYSELF.
And GUESS WHAT? I will also bet money that part of the reason that CDC wanted people to mix and match boosters was to get Moderna “recoverees” boosted with the less cardiotoxic Pfizer or J+J vaccines, while not admitting that…
….defects from each spike protein vaccine are cumulative.
See how that works? Science. It’s great when you’re HONEST.
And why IS Pfizer causing fewer cardiac problems? In my opinion, it is very likely because the vaccine is distributing more widely and slowly in the body, thanks to the extreme vaccine lipid nanoparticle longevity (hence shedding) and biodistribution – data that was hidden from us, but turned up in the Japanese freedom of information request.
To me, the fact that nobody sees or talks about this stuff, is just more evidence of “vaccine hypnosis” of academia, as noted by Peter McCullough.
The reality? PICK YOUR POISON. Disease or vaccine.
If we go back to the arrhythmia example, it turns out that the “shocking 1%” actually GOES AWAY when compared to the unvaccinated. This makes sense, when you recall the very common problem of “palpitation” sending people to the ER, long before “long COVID” was a thing.
Yeah, 1% is shocking, but it’s shocking for the unvaccinated, too. Gateway Pundit was just throwing unwarranted shade.
Now, let’s take a look at some GRAPHICS from the study. Pictures tell a thousand words – not all bad for the vaccines – not all bad for “natural immunity”.
On the left axis you have the three vaccines, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna, followed by the disease.
On the bottom axis, time – repeated three times for the three diseases.
As you can see for cardiac arrhythmia (right side), the vaccines are basically fine, but the disease is problematic. This makes LOTS of sense, because the disease seems to cause many problems by nerve infiltration, secondary to vascular distribution, and those nervous system infections and inflammations are highly relevant for arrhythmias, whereas the vaccine is primarily a vascular villain, which does NOT reproduce and infiltrate.
The science makes sense here! Wonderful!
All of the vaccines have at least a little bit of myocarditis effect (left side), which is explained nicely by vascular distribution of the spike protein. Moderna, which is notorious for “disease-like symptoms” at the recipient experience level, is easily expected to have even more COVID-like spike protein effects that are not immediately obvious, such as myocarditis.
Big point – ONLY the disease (bottom side) kicks off all three diseases. THAT is what a virus can do, that a bare protein, or even a non-reproducing virus-like particle, cannot.
Everything is making sense here. Let’s look at ANOTHER view of the data.
This graph has some GREAT STUFF. The myocarditis comparison described in detail above, is the graph on the LEFT. The numbers for the vaccines look substantially less, but you can see how Moderna boosters would quickly approximate the disease, and are already like a “mild case” in terms of risks. The authors of the paper avoid talking about the cumulative risks, but it’s clear that “boosterama” is PRECISELY Fauci’s game plan, and it has problems that got solved for Moderna by mix-and-match boosters.
Fauci and Walensky. Always taking care of their companies. Yeah, I kinda get it. But you gotta be HARD-ASS with them, like Director Wolf Moon would be.
The whole vaccine thing – including a lot of other adverse effects I’ve mentioned previously but not discussed here – looks to me like a trade-off. These are NOT good vaccines. They’re actually pretty marginal. BUT for people who really don’t think they can take the disease, it could be a reasonable gamble, IMO.
There are LOTS of people who take these vaccines, and no problem. I know – I talk to them all the time. I’m the most vaccine-supportive vaccine skeptic on Earth. These people just dump everything to me, because they know I don’t judge them, but respect their decisions. I’m interested in what happened to them, and they tell me.
NADA. ZIP. The most common reaction. For those people, the shot may make sense. But there are a good number of others who get laid up hard for a day in bed, and it sounds almost as bad as COVID. I worry about them. Some – A LOT.
Now look at the second graph – myocarditis in younger people. Clearly Moderna is WAY out of whack, and the others are comparable to the disease when boosted. Again – for these people – really BAD vaccines. This is why you saw action on the vaccines. Get values up close to the disease, in terms of numerical risks, and the problem becomes an elevator pitch that everybody understands.
Pericarditis and arrhythmia? Purely a disease problem. This looks very good for the vaccine. This is what you WANT with a vaccine – to AVOID some problem of the disease. BUT – can we trust those numbers?
I think so, and I think that Gateway Pundit got burned by looking at COMMENTS on a blog post explaining the Nature study.
Public health policy in the USA and UK need to change fast. As a side note, if you listen to the mainstream media enough they’ll have you believing myocarditis is a mild symptom. Let me be clear, by definition, symptoms requiring hospitalization are defined as severe. What’s more, the average mortality rate of non-fulminant myocarditis is nearly 56% which is experienced within 3-10 years. Sadly, that is a consequence of the likely heart failure that develops after the acute phase of myocarditis has resolved. See picture below
All things considered, it is clear that individuals under 40 are at a high risk of experiencing vaccine induced myocarditis. The good news is, there are ways to deal with this. More specifically, increasing the time between the first and second dose, not giving boosters to all healthy individuals under 40, pausing Moderna for many under 30, and seeking the guidance of other countries. All of that makes for better public health policy and positive health outcomes. To finish, I will leave you with the words of a wise man, “Health care is vital to all of us some of the time, but public health is vital to all of us all of the time”. – C. Everett Koop
Wolf again.
Now – in the comments, somebody mentioned the “1% issue”, and I suspect this is where GWP picked it up. Sadly, the comment author deleted and restated their comment, probably after realizing it had spawned a widely read article.
Here is the replacement comment, with replies.
zuFpM5*M6 hr ago I erased my previous comment. The closer I look at this study, the more it freaks me out.
They compare vaxxed to vaxxed+covid and then declare covid is worse, but they measure rates of myocarditis/pericarditis in post covid with troponin levels and in post vaxx with hospitalization rates. Hmmmm
They don’t include any control group of unvaxxed. The vaxx+covid group should be compared to unvaxx+covid to determine the actual rate of post covid heart issues. This is not done that I can tell?
The vaccinated showed a 1% hospitalization rate for cardiac arrhythmia with ~385,000 in the period up to 28 days post vaccination. I tried to look up population rates of hospitalization and found some old news articles discussing ~350,000-500,000 hospitalizations annually for ‘atrial fibrillation’ for the entire US population. So a group of vaccinated in UK blew out the entire US annual budget of arrhythmia hospitalizations in a couple month period? And that isn’t a highlighted part of the research results but instead they compare only within the vaccinated group broken out by short temporal periods? Isn’t the most important thing the vaccinated versus background normal rate?
I begin to think this whole study was gamed to get vaccinated rates of these issues versus supposed covid rates so they could continue to say vaccines are safer, when the actual #s are showing a horrific rise in these issues. It is a preemptive narrative shaping attempt.
I am not a doctor, researcher or number cruncher, so if I am misunderstanding this, I would be interested to hear how.
br143 hr ago There’s no way to sugar coat the study.
Of the ~385,000 people with arrhythmia, 10.3% had a positive Covid-19 test, and 7.7% tested positive at some point prior to vaccination.
Even if you remove 18% of the total, that’s still an awful lot of people with arrhythmia. I suppose most of us have some form of arrhythmia at some time in our lives, but how many of us are treated in hospital?
zuFpM5*M3 hr ago Yes. I would not subtract them either. I feel that there would be a covid risk increase + vaccine risk increase + covid/vaccine interaction risk increase to account for. None of which can be done without estimating the covid risk increase by comparing with non-vaccinated covid patients.
This is where they lost me. They’re just tossing out “maybes”. Nothing jumps out at me as likely to change the result. I can even add my own experience with cardiovascular issues from the disease. They’re REAL. Very unlikely that the vaccines and disease would FLIP on the relative risks of arrhythmia.
Score 1 for the vaccines.
BACK TO THE TRUMP ISSUE.
Benefits of the Vaccine Admitted by Our Side
There is a GREAT video by Geert Vanden Bossche that I keep pushing, because it is one of the clearest explanations of why “leaky mass vaccination” is a bad idea. Note that this is from a pro-vaxxer who has indeed worked with vaccines for his whole career, and is a former member of GAVI.
He just demands good vaccines, and good public vaccination policy.
Now – if you jump to around 4:30 in the video, you can hear him list the positives of the clot shot. HOWEVER, it may be better to just invest some of your time in that 4 1/2 minutes where he warms up to that point, to understand that he’s putting the positives AND the negatives in context, and looking at the bigger picture to recommend that we NOT mass-vaccinate.
He is saying that we should NOT mass-vaccinate IN SPITE OF the benefits that he lists and explains.
a decrease of disease in many countries
decline of morbidity and mortality rates
less illness in people who got vaccinated
severe disease is resisted even when vaccinees are infected with variants
they will shed much less virus than the unvaccinated, even when infected with variants
seropositivity rates are increasing in the population thanks to vaccination
But THAT is where he begins to disagree with mass vaccination. He states that we will NOT reach herd immunity, due to variants, and he explains this fully.
Global Problems of Sub-Optimal Mass Vaccination
At 28:00 minutes, Geert explains what we need to do – which is NOT what public officials are doing.
The current mass vaccination program will make things worse, in the long term. Geert explains then the kinds of vaccines we really need – vaccines which can both generate sterilizing immunity, AND which prime the immune systems of their recipients toward cellular immunity.
Yeah, it’s a bit of a tough goal, but it’s realistic toward the challenges of the China virus, and honest about what we need to do.
So what does this mean about the benefits of the vaccine?
THEY ARE REAL, BUT THEY ARE SHORT-SIGHTED. And they are accompanied by risks. Not just to the vaccinees, but to ALL OF US ON THIS PLANET.
According to Geert, continued vaccination is going to HARM vaccinees, relative to the unvaccinated, who will need to avoid virus-shedding vaccinees. At that point, recoverees may be in the best position of all, but still – not great. ALL of us will be in trouble from the virus which will escape the vaccines.
Geert also explains how we can prove that he is correct – by looking at the mutations in the virus which is shed from vaccinees, which will show selection for more infectious variants, if he is correct.
Now – this is a GREAT interview of Geert by Dana Loesch, who looks more and more like Sandra Bullock for some reason, but what the heck – the shotgun shells on her microphone setup are EXCELLENT, very non-Bullock, and she gets a FANTASTIC explanation of the problem from Geert.
Geert actually talks about Omicron, and the DANGER of it potentially evolving to be MORE SEVERE.
Take a listen!
Does Trump know this stuff? I don’t know.
I personally believe that Geert is right. I am now of the opinion that most of what we are hearing from Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, and Geert Vanden Bossche is true, but that each one has to give a little toward the ultimate truth.
What does that look like to me?
Natural immunity is NOT permanent or complete toward other variants
Natural immunity is better than the vaccines, generally speaking, but not bulletproof
Untreated COVID is a loser relative to the vaccines, but treated COVID is a winner
McCullough’s natural immunity prediction based on SARS1 may be too confident
Malone’s whistleblower on more shedding by vaccinees may have been wrong or disinformation
Geert’s vax-brag of less shedding by vaccinees may have been too kind and not skeptical enough
We have to stop pushing the vaccines, for the good of humanity
We have to allow the vaccines to continue, at an acceptably lower rate, for research
We have to allow vaccines to change faster, to keep up with mutations, IF and only IF this will not PUSH the virus to mutate and select faster (immune pressure must be low enough)
We have to pursue the superior vaccines that Geert is specifying
We have to use infection, treatment, and recovery as a big gun to reach herd immunity
We have to let COVID burn out of epidemic status, to reach a treatable endemic status
We cannot do that with mass vaccination, so mandates must cease promptly and completely
Joe Biden and CDC must be stopped – by military power if need be – if they will not end the crazy mandates
Yeah, you heard me. We can’t let this demented bozo, backed by an evil Obama and China, make COVID worse by mass vaccination. Mandates are making things worse.
Freedom, Vaccines and Morality
Trump may not understand Geert Vanden Bossche’s warning, but if we set that aside as an unknown, you can understand where Trump is coming from.
If we want freedom, we have to let other people make stupid choices that affect them most of all. Vaccination is, in fact, one of those things. Indeed, it is by US seeing it that way, that I believe we will end this nightmare of division which PUMPS UP the vaxxies and the crazy mandates.
In the same way that there are vaxxies who now are defending OUR freedom to be unvaccinated, I believe we have to defend the right of people to stupidly (or smartly) take the vaccine. However, we MUST get the rate of vaccination DOWN below the level where immune pressure from the vaccine creates more and more infectious variants.
The FIRST thing is not to take the vaccine yourself, or give it to your children.
The SECOND thing is to fight for an end to mandates.
The THIRD thing is to fight for BETTER vaccines, and to expand belief that the current vaccines are NOT GOOD ENOUGH, and are of the WRONG TYPE. Make the vaxxies demand better, not defend bad vaxxes.
The FOURTH thing is to spread the message that the “socially responsible thing to do” is to support Vanden Bossche’s position, that NOT taking the vaccine NOW is what will ultimately “save grandma”.
The last one is a hard sell, with FAKE NEWS pumping vaccine stupidity, but hey – we’ve fought tougher battles already.
So what about Trump?
Well, he is not in the position to know or respond to the “Geert Vanden Bossche Question”. Not yet. It is only when that issue becomes BURNING HOT, that Trump will be able to smartly push FORWARD from the current stupid CLOT SHOTS.
We will have to RAISE VACCINE CONSCIOUSNESS to levels of understanding that SUBVERT FAKE NEWS. We can only do that by getting most of the vaxxies on our side – to demand BETTER vaccines.
If they want to be guinea pigs – GREAT. They can be heroes, and try the deadly experimental vaccines. But we should NOT be forcing all of humanity to be part of a BAD and MISGUIDED experiment.
And the JOKERS who are allegedly running our military need to understand this. Virtue signals which kill troops, even if slowly and quietly, where nobody can see them, are NOT ACTUALLY VIRTUOUS. I appreciate them kicking out the sane ones who understand that the current bad clot shots may cripple readiness at some point, rather than forcibly injecting them. We WILL have a reserve of trained people who are not destroyed by China and Biden, no matter what China’s coming chess moves. Thank you for that. But as for everything else – there could have been push-back against communism, instead of acquiescence.
Yes, we had to be shown. But I’m not sure showing us subservience to a COUP and CHINA and FAKE NEWS isn’t undoing half of the good stuff.
But this as well. If you guys delivered Omicron on purpose, thanks. It LOOKS like it may be working.
Merry Christmas!
W
Remember way back in July when I was banned by Twitter for saying that mandates were coming, vaccines weren’t working as promised and they’re gonna demand we all take boosters?
Is the Directed Evolution of Variants – Something Deeply Understandable to Joe Biden’s Science Advisors – Being Abused by the Corporate-Government-Academic Axis?
Yeah, you remember that one!
Several hat tips to Sundance on this one, too.
It’s now becoming very clear that the mercenary Bill Gates getting involved with healthcare was one of the LAST things that one could reasonably expect to help it.
We were such chumps.
GRIFTERS GONNA GRIFT.
They don’t “change”. They don’t “turn over a new leaf”. They GRIFT MORE and they GRIFT BIGGER.
Two international vaccine experts can help us to see how we got into the SUSTAINABLE GRIFT of needless vaccines to endlessly mutating viruses, which Bill Gates helped engineer.
Notice that I didn’t say sustainability grift – that’s a different grift, that uses MIRAGES of process sustainability to sell the opposite.
An excellent example of the sustainability grift is wind power, which – when you count all the resource consumption and natural destruction needed to “move lots of matter around with low energy output”, wastes more energy and resources overall, than it produces – and in the long run is NOT actually “sustainable”.
Wind power uses a mirage of overall sustainability which results from hypnosis by the microscopic sustainability of just ONE STAGE in the process, to sell a totality which is not truly sustainable or even efficient. Solar power is very similar. It has its uses, but the mirage they sell is far outside of the truth.
This type of grifting uses a misleading focus on part of the truth to sell a larger untruth, which is how many science grifts work.
Perpetual motion machines are an exemplary grift, and Anthony Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis” is an exemplary misdirection.
No – a sustainable grift (which can include the sustainability grift, cutely) is a grift that maintains itself in perpetuity, provided nobody looks closely. One of the best ways to create such a grift, is to pose a general source of a problem as a solution to it, so that the central problem will NEVER be solved.
This is a form of misleading by REVERSING reality. It’s a CYCLIC grift, that creates a false solution which is really a problem source.
Black Lives Matter(TM) is precisely that kind of sustainable grift.
To solve policing problems, BLM/Soros creates more problems and mischaracterizes them so that they can’t be solved.
BLM(TM), working with Soros DAs and AGs, creates thousands of new criminals of all kinds, at the same time hindering police, in the name of mercy for criminals who are intentionally misportrayed as innocent.
If you can pull it off, this kind of misleading can create monumental, whole-of-society grifts, that in some cases can NEVER be undone.
Climate change / global warming / global freezing are all beautiful GRIFTS of that nature, joined by the principle that “together, we can all do something impossible” – even better if it’s something needless. If the workers of the scam movement get busted, they just change the story – like all criminals do.
“Government will protect you from what it cannot affect.”
Fall for that kind of scam, and you are a SLAVE FOR LIFE.
So where does this go with vaccines?
Bill Gates Takes Over Global Vaccination
Astrid Stuckelberger figured out what was happening to global public health when Bill Gates took control of it, but she figured it out too late.
Let’s just save that image for when Bill Gates’ friends finally take down that article.
Here is the relevant section:
Stuckelberger also underscored that the “WHO is not the same organization as before”. There was a change in 2016, she explained.
“It was special: Organizations such as GAVI – the Global Alliance for Vaccine Immunization led by Bill Gates – they came to WHO in 2006 with funding. Since then, the WHO has developed into a new type of international organization. GAVI gained more and more influence, and total immunity, more than the diplomats in the UN. GAVI can do exactly what they want, the police can do nothing.”
The WHO underwent an audit in 2014 and after that, it became more like a company with countries as its subsidiaries.
“When I worked with international relations in the WHO in 2013, I saw that GAVI came in more and more. GAVI presented a global action plan for vaccination 2012-2020. That is, eight years where GAVI had everything in their hands. Bill Gates handled the vaccination, he took over.”
The WHO wields enormous power over countries, she said. “Before, all countries were free. But now, when I do interviews around the world, I see that each country is part of a ‘WHO company’. WHO is no longer a democratic member organization, like the UN. The various governments form the basis of the ‘enterprise’. It logically agrees with what is happening now, since the ‘companies’ want money, business, and to control people. It’s like slavery. The taxes we pay, they go to governments that are subject to ‘the company’. Under the multinational organizations, such as GAVI.”
“GAVI, the World Bank and the WHO entered into a contract called IFFM: International Facility Finance for Immunization. Our countries, our people, pay to the WHO, the World Bank and GAVI to carry out their immunization programs. Which means vaccinating the entire population. When you see the plan from GAVI, you see that from 2012 to 2020 they have had this as a goal. But then it did not work, they had to create a pandemic.”
She said the pandemic was most certainly planned. ” You can see this from all the documents. Everyone can analyze them, they are in the open, right in front of our eyes.”
GAVI is only ONE of Bill Gates’ “hidden hand” organizations, by which he gets TWO TOP VOTES on any council or advisory board. GAVI allows Bill Gates to control a putative solution – vaccines.
There is another organization called CEPI – Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations – by which Bill Gates controls the PROBLEM for which VACCINES are allegedly the answer.
Note that Bill Gates is controlling both the problem and the solution – and if the solution CAUSES THE PROBLEM, then he has just achieved what he needs as the basis for a cyclic, sustainable grift.
Do you see how CEPI – about epidemics – is only pointing toward one solution – vaccines?
Subtle, but learn to be a grift-catcher, and it just jumps out at you.
Let’s take a closer look at CEPI.
Quite obviously, CEPI was all over Event 201 – although the SPONSORS were slightly different.
See how that works? SELF-DEALING. Gates is an absolute expert at it. He controls VACCINES, and he controls EPIDEMICS. The PROBLEM, and the “SOLUTION” – which, if one tells the big lie just right – can CAUSE THE PROBLEM TO LAST FOREVER.
It’s CYCLIC, and it’s SUSTAINABLE, and it’s the same GRIFT PRINCIPLE as the wrap-up smear, where one hand claims that the other hand is the “news source”.
See how the control arises? Read that bit about CEPI. “Collaboration with regulators”? What do you THINK is going to happen? Same thing. Eventually, it’s all one side, and there are no checks and balances.
Gates is such a sharp operator. SO much sharper than the chumps he fools.
But there is HOPE in THE TRUTH – and Gates’ organization DID produce a TRUTH-TELLER.
Why BAD VACCINES are Worse Than NO VACCINES and Why We Need to STOP MASS-VACCINATION
When I heard a vaccine expert – a veteran of GAVI – namely Geert Vanden Bossche – saying that vaccinating into the pandemic was a BAD IDEA, well THAT is when my ears perked up, WOLF-QUICK.
Take note of the fact that this guy IS NOT and never was the HEAD of GAVI. He was NEVER one of their top clowns. He just worked for them. The head of GAVI can NEVER say anything like this – something that doesn’t back up Bill Gates 100%.
But this guy Vanden Bossche, who worked in vaccines his whole life, including for Bill Gates’ own organization GAVI, has expert knowledge that Bill Gates is pushing the wrong solution in our current situation.
Well, THAT is interesting.
Now – listen to Vanden Bossche talk about VARIANTS and vaccinating CHILDREN, when Gates and “other organizations” (COUGH, COUGH) started pushing THAT.
Remember – this video is JUNE 1, 2021. Everything Geert said has come true with Delta, and it coming true AGAIN with Omicron, as he predicted. This guy understood directed evolution of variants from the very beginning, and how those variants are why we have to STOP VACCINATING.
There are other people – on Biden’s scientific advisory board – who also understand directed evolution of variants. The question is, what are they doing with that knowledge? Are they causing the problem? Or are they even looking at the solution? We’ll get to that later.
Also – just a warning – Geert speaks ANNOYINGLY SLOWLY – but also EXTREMELY CLEARLY.
This is a 10-minute video that takes 35 minutes to get out, but there is NO MISTAKING what he says.
The omicron epidemic is being driven by young, vaccinated people, according to mounting data from countries as diverse as the UK, Denmark and South Africa https://t.co/bTRIBFsCc7
It’s behind a paywall, but this much shows through:
“Data from Denmark shows that just over 70 per cent of omicron cases have been among those younger than 40.”
If you now go back and listen to Geert, starting at around 28 minutes, and from there to the end of the video, you will see that he predicted exactly what is happening – that the disease under pressure of the bad vaccines would mutate and move into the [generally] unvaccinated younger people – AND – and this is important – that VACCINATING THEM WITH THE CURRENT SUB-OPTIMAL VACCINES IS THE EXACT WRONG THING TO DO.
Why?
BECAUSE IT WILL MAKE THINGS EVEN WORSE.
Oh.
And he explains HOW it will be worse. It could be as bad as a Marek’s disease scenario.
This is what people are NOT GETTING – that the current vaccines are NOT GOOD ENOUGH, and that they are CAUSING MORE PROBLEMS THAN THEY SOLVE.
That’s GREAT if you have a GRIFT that depends on the bad vaccines. It’s NOT SO GREAT if you’re somebody who actually cares about SOLVING problems (plural).
You know – like not making a new problem worse than the old one, and covering it up.
NOW – lo and behold – Joe Biden actually has two people advising him, on his board of science and technology advisers, who should care DEEPLY about this problem – if they actually ARE still scientists, and not pawns of industry and government.
Let’s meet them.
The Genetics and Evolution Girls Currently Advising Joe Biden
I kinda stumbled onto this story.
I was over on The National Pulse, looking at a link which ForGodandCountry gave me, when I found ANOTHER story in the sidebar.
This woman is the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Advising Joe Biden.
FTA:
Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellmann – a member of Pfizer Inc.’s Board of Directors – previously served as the Lead Independent Director at social media giant Facebook. The site has routinely censored posts relating to COVID-19 vaccines, with Pfizer in particular eliciting support from major corporate outlets.
Hellman was appointed to the social media platform’s board in March 2013 and served as it Lead Independent Director from June 2015 until October 30th 2019, shortly before the first reported case of COVID-19.
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook founder and CEO, said “Sue has been a wonderful and thoughtful voice on the board for six years, and I’m personally grateful to her for everything she has done for this company” in response to her departure.
“I remain positive about Facebook and the mission to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. Facebook’s Shareholders require a Board of Directors that is fully engaged and committed to address the critical issues confronting Facebook at this time,” Hellmann explained in reference to her role as the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
“Unfortunately, increasing demands from my CEO role, my extended family, and my own health make it no longer possible for me to commit the necessary time and energy required to properly serve Facebook and its shareholders,” she added in a public statement despite joining Pfizers board in 2020.
Amidst Hellmann’s tenure on the Pfizer board, Facebook has initiated campaigns to censor COVID-19 vaccine skeptics, as leaked internal documents from the company reveal algorithms aimed at “drastically reduc[ing] user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments.”
Facebook Pfizer Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Genentech U.C. San. Fran. U.C. Berkeley AIDS research in Uganda Rockefeller Foundation Bristol-Myers Squibb Federal Reserve Bank of San Fran Global Health 2030
She’s behind a data initiative that basically reports individual patient data back to researchers to “accelerate research and learning blah-blah-blah”.
From Wikipedia:
Precision medicine based on Google Maps
In 2011, Desmond-Hellmann co-chaired a National Academy of Sciences committee that recommended creating a Google Maps-like data network aimed at developing more diagnostics and treatments tailored to individual patients — a concept known as “precision medicine”.[12] The so-called “knowledge network” would integrate the wealth of data emerging on the molecular basis of disease with information on environmental factors and patients’ electronic medical records and would allow scientists to share emerging research findings faster, thereby accelerating the development of tailored treatments. It also would allow clinicians to make more informed decisions about treatments, reduce health care costs and ultimately improve care.[13] The NAS report, titled “Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease”, was described by Keith Yamamoto, Vice Chancellor for Research at UCSF, as “the most important National Academy of Sciences Framework Analysis since that advisory body recommended that the United States go forward with the Human Genome Project”.[14]
In 2021, Desmond-Hellmann was appointed by President Joe Biden to the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), co-chaired by Frances Arnold, Eric Lander and Maria Zuber.
So – as a SIDEBAR – this woman was involved in the “freeing up” of electronic medical information which has basically DESTROYED medical privacy.
Which was GREAT for Democrat trial lawyers, by the way. Just today I got a call from AMBULANCE CHASERS based on a “confidential” diagnosis (nothing bad – don’t worry) that just went into my electronic records a few weeks ago.
I was SHOCKED that these people came on to me. It’s like Obamacare knifing my doctor in the back. The only way they knew, was access to my medical records. It should be absolutely illegal as hell for anybody – much less Democrat ambulance chasers – to know about that rare diagnosis and actually cold-call me to try to stir up a case. But yeah – destroying medical privacy in the name of helping researchers like her – that is just one example – a small example – of how “Inception” by the bad guys works. Find a smart dupe and get them to pimp an idea you need. Maybe even make them THINK they thought of it.
Free up the data with the EXCUSE of the good guys getting it, so that the BAD GUYS can do all kinds of things with it.
I know all about this – about being used as a PROXY to advance an idea because that proxy has respect as a scientist. It’s a nasty game.
Anyway….. [end of sidebar]
I am NOT of the opinion that this woman is as bad as someone like – say – Bill Gates. But I AM of the opinion that she’s very likely a politically correct “reliable board skirt” who always votes the way people are SUPPOSED to vote on board decisions. She’s Bilderberg fodder. She’s SMART and she GETS IT DONE. But she always does the “right thing” – the expected thing – the thing that somebody with more power and more control wants done.
So THIS woman is NEVER going to tell Joe Biden what Bill Gates doesn’t want him to hear.
But if there is any wonder why Joe Biden keeps trying to mandate vaccines, yeah, it’s because one of his science advisors is the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Pioneered the use of “pushed” evolution of organisms in the lab to make them useful
Nobel Prize winner
co-chair of Joe Biden’s “board” of science and technology advisors
So what’s up with this “directed evolution”?
From Wikipedia…..
Arnold is credited with pioneering the use of directed evolution to create enzymes (biochemical molecules—often proteins—that catalyze, or speed up, chemical reactions) with improved and/or novel functions.[25] The directed evolution strategy involves iterative rounds of mutagenesis and screening for proteins with improved functions and it has been used to create useful biological systems, including enzymes, metabolic pathways, genetic regulatory circuits, and organisms. In nature, evolution by natural selection can lead to proteins (including enzymes) well-suited to carry out biological tasks, but natural selection can only act on existing sequence variations (mutations) and typically occurs over long time periods.[26] Arnold speeds up the process by introducing mutations in the underlying sequences of proteins; she then tests these mutations’ effects. If a mutation improves the proteins’ function she can keep iterating the process to optimize it further. This strategy has broad implications because it can be used to design proteins for a wide variety of applications.[27] For example, she has used directed evolution to design enzymes that can be used to produce renewable fuels and pharmaceutical compounds with less harm to the environment.[25]
One advantage of directed evolution is that the mutations do not have to be completely random; instead, they can be random enough to discover unexplored potential, but not so random as to be inefficient. The number of possible mutation combinations is astronomical, but instead of just randomly trying to test as many as possible, she integrates her knowledge of biochemistry to narrow down the options, focusing on introducing mutations in areas of the protein that are likely to have the most positive effect on activity and avoiding areas in which mutations would likely be, at best, neutral and at worst, detrimental (such as disrupting proper protein folding).[25]
So – there you have it – “mutagenesis and screening“. In a way, it’s still just breeding horses or labradoodles, but much more technical and scientific.
If you suddenly think that, “Hey, this sounds a lot like what Fauci, Baric, Daszak and Bat Lady were doing” – you know – gain of function – well, that’s precisely it.
And think about this.
The SPIKE PROTEIN is a protein just like an ENZYME is protein. The only difference there, is that FAUCI and his gang were controlling the “directed evolution” of viruses making proteins toward whatever goals THEY thought useful, whereas Arnold was controlling the “directed evolution” of bacteria making proteins toward whatever goals SHE thought useful.
I remember when Arnold’s work was frequently showcased in Chemical & Engineering News. Yeah, a lot of it was feminist championing of a woman scientist by the C&EN media leftoids – BUT the fact is that Arnold’s work was very interesting stuff, and her interests and abilities always struck me as authentic – that she was NOT a “manufactured” science celebrity. She was showcased more than created.
One can argue about whether she deserved to be Beast-marked by the Dynamite Prize or not. Doesn’t really matter. To borrow from Trump, “Knowledge is the prize.”
In principle, this lady is capable of understanding and RESPECTING Geert Vanden Bossche’s arguments. If she’s going to disagree with him HONESTLY, then it will be for good reasons.
But that’s not the end of the story.
Let’s talk mutagenesis.
Remdesivir and Molnupiravir as Mutagens
Now I’m not saying that ALL of these new COVID drugs are human mutagens or teratogens. In fact, most likely, NONE of them are. The Pfizer drug is not a mutagen as far as I know – but then that drug is actually a binary drug, and one of THOSE two drugs is an established AIDS drug, which is quite fishy in light of VAIDS.
What I am saying is that TWO of these drugs are PROVEN viral mutagens.
Sorta like that critical step in Frances Arnold’s work.
So are we trying to ACCELERATE the appearance of variants? Are we consciously trying to CHANGE how or how fast they vary? Is SOMEBODY consciously trying to change how or how fast they vary?
Here is where I talked about the apparent public health contradiction of using drugs like molnupiravir and remdesivir on a virus which mutates into “variants of concern” before:
Why would we mass treat a virus with a drug which forces the virus to mutate, when mutation is how the virus creates new variants that reinfect the vaccinated? Before I explain the title contradiction, let me start with an admission. Most of my life, I have been very friendly with the pharmaceutical industry. I …
In that blog post, I explained that (1) remdesivir has been PROVEN to “push” SARS-CoV-2 toward evolution of variants, including “variants of concern”, and (2) molnupiravir works on the principle of “mutation catastrophe” in the SARS-CoV-2 reproductive process, so it likely does the same thing even more.
So are we “doing the Arnold” or what?
I will leave that up to others to answer.
Let me close instead with one more great article which summarizes where we are.
It’s Vanden Bossche without Vanden Bossche.
Eugyppius & The Conservation of Corona
If you have not found this anonymous German dude’s substack account, you need to be watching it. It’s almost better than Alex Berenson’s account, which is a pretty hard thing to do.
Among several great posts, this one is critical.
Let me just quote the first few paragraphs.
FTA:
The ascendancy of more transmissible (and possibly also more pathogenic) Delta strains is a consequence of the worldwide vaccination campaign. This is now the most salient and the most important side-effect of our vaccines. They elicit antibodies that select for more aggressive SARS-2 lineages, which escape vaccine-induced immunity by replicating in the lungs of infected people faster and earlier.
All our evidence is that the alpha (Kent) and delta (Indian) lineages emerged at the same time, in September or October 2020. Delta was more aggressive than alpha, but alpha had the upper hand until vaccines killed it off. Probably, Delta is too aggressive in completely unvaccinated populations, causing severe illness before very many of its hosts can do much spreading.
Consider the entirely typical case of my country, Germany. Most first doses here were administered over the course of nine weeks, from early April to early July. In precisely this period, Delta began its rise to absolute dominance. The genetic diversity of SARS-2 has been totally destroyed in Germany and everywhere else too.
What you see happening to Alpha in this chart, is what the vaccines were supposed to do to Corona as a whole. But then it was Corona’s move, and Delta is the hand it played.
Nothing about how the pandemic plays out now can be disentangled from the vaccines. The more aggressive spread of Delta among the unvaccinated is as much a part of this campaign, as its continued spread among the vaccinated. We have totally changed the environment in which SARS-2 circulates, and in response SARS-2 has become more transmissible and more volatile across the board.
A lot of people say that “it’s not a vaccine”, and while I actually LIKE the fact that the CDC – for BAD REASONS – made a GOOD CHANGE (in my opinion) in the definition of vaccines, I am forced to admit that the CDC DEMOCRATS did the KNAVISH DEMOCRAT THING and “changed the rules”, which Democrats always do, instead of confronting the badness of the bad vaccines they want to force on everybody, and thus are stupidly committed to defending.
Note that the CDC definition change ALLOWS me to call these things BAD VACCINES, because the new definition allows both qualitative and quantitative expectations on vaccine performance.
But I am going beyond just calling them bad vaccines. I did a knavish thing back, and created (possibly for the second or third time – who knows?) a NEW NAME that can be used to distinguish mRNA virus-like particle and cDNA viral vector “vaccines” from the much more standard and understood protein and glycoprotein antigen vaccines which would have VERY LIKELY been much safer and more trustworthy than the vaccines we got.
THUS – I’m calling these things “haxxines” – precisely because they are GENETIC HACKS. One can easily call them “genetic vaccines”, but by calling them “genetic hacks”, “haccines”, or most especially “haxxines“, one gets to the root problem, from the view of scientists and programmers. These things are FAST HACKS – they’re untried methods – unproven experimental fixes – and more than that, they are LITERALLY “genetic hacks”.
You’ve heard of “life hacks”, so you know what I’m talking about.
“Hacks” tend to have a kind of “go with the flow” and “uncontrolled outcome” quality, which creates simplicity and elegance in the overall method, but the downsides of “premature ability” and “unforeseen but expectable consequences” loom VERY large.
In other words, “hacks” give Jimmy Olson the Superman abilities he probably shouldn’t have right now, and bad things can and do result.
There is NO WAY around the truth of things. These vaccines are GENETIC HACKS. I look at the methodology of what was done, and what Pfizer and Moderna are HIDING, and I can tell.
HACKS!!!
Now, “hacking” is how a lot of things are “tried and discovered” in science and programming. I am as guilty as any other scientist or programmer of having PROUDLY developed many beautiful hacks that saved people lots of time, money, and effort. Some of those hacks are still in use, because over time they gained trust and certainty. Vaccination ITSELF is a beautiful HACK that saved millions of lives. The easy cases – stuff like rabies and smallpox – are particularly awesome results.
Hell – IVERMECTIN IS A HUGE HACK!
It’s a great hack! It’s an awesome hack, because one of the HACKED ELEMENTS is that the therapeutic margin is INSANELY LARGE. The hack isn’t GREAT, but the hack can’t screw up!
These kinds of “safe hacks” rarely come along. Ivermectin is so awesome precisely because it’s an antiviral HACK.
SO – don’t consider this as much “anti-vaccine” as PRO-TRUTH. These hacky vaccines are hacky as hell, and absolutely UN-MANDATABLE, in my opinion as a scientist. Mandating a HACK is almost always STUPID. But almost all hacks lead to something good, if you TREAT THE DAMN THING AS A HACK.
“Haxxines”. Be careful with the damn things. They’re HACKY. Are you sure you want to take one? Not me. These don’t look like a “great hack”. They look like a BAD HACK that’s gonna need a lot of fixing.
And I say that as somebody who had to FIX a lot of other people’s HACKS.
OK? Good.
9. Stillbirths and Miscarriages
The Gateway Pundit reminds us that there appears to be a HUGE jump in miscarriages, stillbirths, and “uterine dumps” after the haxxine. It’s NOT just obvious in the VAERS data – the facts are slipping out thanks to honest healthcare workers.
The HORROR is that most hospital administrations seem to be hiding the numbers.
You have to click on this link above and look at the numbers. They’re shocking even to non-scientists, but to a scientist, this SHOULD be obvious as hell.
Look – I’m going to be very straight with you. The numbers are absolutely scary, because they are “anecdotal but precise and outside the range where any kind of error matters”. These are very often “two or more orders of magnitude things”. If you don’t see them, you’re bloody blind, or trying very hard not to see them.
If this happened for any other reason than the vaccine – something like “water pollution” or a “serial killer nurse in hospitals”, the authorities in Canada where this was documented would be FREAKING. But let’s be real – because if it’s the haxxine, it’s THEIR POLICY, and so suddenly they act like they don’t know what’s going on.
And the media just goes along with the insane pretense of ignorance.
What we’re talking about is a situation where numbers of stillbirths jumped by TWO ORDERS of magnitude – from less than ten to nearly 100 in the same timeframe – AND we have a likely suspect that OTHER evidence supports.
Scientifically, it’s a NO DAMN BRAINER.
The numbers are STARK and MASSIVE
The number one suspect MUST BE vaccination
The haxxine has demonstrated proper suspect actions
The haxxine has awesome explanatory mechanisms
The haxxine makers HID THE EXPLANATORY DATA
The haxxine makers have been caught hiding and lying before
This is not hard. This is where the audience SCREAMS AT COLUMBO. And they scream at Columbo, because he’s still playing dumb, and hasn’t yet pointed his good eye at the suspect, and his cigar at the roof, and said “One more thing, Mrs. Psaki.”
I cannot for the life of me understand why the CDC/FDA/DNC complex is MANDATING a bad vaccine for a COLD – a vaccine that so obviously causes stillbirths – unless that’s the plan.
Well, we know Democrats like abortion, and they like contraception, and this vaccine is a bit like a lottery halfway between them, and – damn, Mrs. Psaki – THAT SURE MAKES SENSE.
Don’t take the haxxine if you’re pregnant, or ever planning to get pregnant. Just don’t. It’s just stupid.
OK?
Something is VERY WRONG with this vaccine, and just because the people who would be hurt by the admission won’t admit it, doesn’t mean there isn’t something very wrong with the vaccine.
I mean haxxine.
8. Your Kid Could Get a “Toxic Batch” of the Pfizer Vaccine.
If you’re thinking of vaccinating your kids, you need to be aware of the fact that the Pfizer vaccine for kids appears to have a “toxic batch problem” very similar to the adult vaccine.
Not only is the number of adverse outcome events in children absolutely unacceptable, in my opinion – there seems to be a systematic problem with the vaccine which has NOT been identified.
Now, I’m going to be completely blunt here. IGNORING all of the possibilities of long-term damage, like myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke, sterility, etc., and JUST looking at “immediate reactions to the Pfizer COVID vaccine”, and then comparing THOSE reactions to most childhood vaccines, which are absolutely DWARFED in VAERS by the Pfizer numbers, I don’t think there is any way that I would vaccinate a young child, older child, teen or young adult with this vaccine.
It’s just POINTLESS. The risks from the disease itself to those cohorts are absolutely minuscule and mild, but the risks from the vaccine are definite and serious – and FAR WORSE than EVERY other vaccine. In fact, they’re far worse than historic bad vaccines that got withdrawn.
It is STUPID to vaccinate your kid – particularly just because DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS say so. They don’t have good reasons – they’re just “order-followers” like Nazis. And if you can’t see THAT – well, think what that means. Are YOU a stupid “order-following” Nazi?
I simply find it stupid to take needless risks like this – that don’t even offer FUN as a reward. Buy your kid a higher-quality bicycle helmet. Teach them how to swim. Take them hiking and climbing and skating. There are thousands of stupid fun things that still make sense. This vaccine does not.
It makes sense for Pfizer and the politicians it bribes. That’s about it.
7. Original Antigenic Sin is a Real and Very Serious Reason to Stop Vaccinating Everyone
That is actually the title of a very interesting substack blog post explaining TWO recent scientific papers. You can find links to the papers in the blog post.
This excellent post spends most of its effort explaining the papers, which largely show how prior antibody immunity to ANY human coronavirus other than the particular strain in question, tends to HURT immunity to the ONE in question.
Basically, prior coronavirus exposure MISLEADS antibody response to later coronavirus infection.
Thus, the idea of “original antigenic sin” is that what your immune system initially “imprints” on, will determine what it does later, and if it imprints on the wrong thing, it will lead to wrong responses.
What this tells us, is that natural immunity which does NOT use OLD PLAYBOOKS is what wins against coronaviruses, but the VACCINES are always OLD SPECIFIC PLAYBOOKS, and therefore not very good.
Here is the author, eugyppius.
FTA:
The severity of Corona infection varies wildly across the population. Children have generally mild or asymptomatic infections, while adults have a wide range of responses. Everyone always assumed that cross-immunity was part of the answer to this conundrum. The problem is that – at least as far as antibodies go – it is shaping up to be a not very reassuring part of that answer. The innate and non-specific immune response of children looks more and more like a big part of the reason they are spared severe infection. Adults with immune systems tightly calibrated to the common human coronaviruses, meanwhile, often have more severe symptoms. They suffer from Original Antigenic Sin.
Over 4.2 billion people across the earth have received at least one dose of vaccine against SARS-2. The majority of these vaccines have elicited antibodies only against an early form of the spike protein that is no longer in circulation.
This would seem to be one reason why many western countries with high vaccination rates appear to have locked themselves into an indefinite phase of heightened SARS-2 transmission. In the United Kingdom, 96% of adults have antibodies to the spike protein – most of these first acquired by vaccination. Shortly after they concluded their vaccination campaign, cases skyrocketed, and they have remained high ever since.
Original Antigenic Sin is a real phenomenon. It seems not only to permanently influence the immune response to the spike protein itself, but also to inhibit the development of antibodies to other SARS-2 proteins. A worst case scenario, would be a future spike mutation that entirely escapes the anti-spike antibodies elicited by our vaccines. In this case, it seems possible that many vaccinated people will be stuck with permanently suboptimal immune responses. If Omicron is indeed circulating primarily among the vaccinated, as some data suggests, this would seem to be one possibly reason why. These concerns are particularly acute in the case of children, who may well be exposed to the risk of very serious illness in the future, if vaccination permanently misdirects their immune system.
Wolf again.
“Misdirection” is the word we are looking for here. This allows us to go beyond the idea of “original antigenic sin”, to expand the idea to “subsequent antigenic sin”.
EVERY exposure from birth to death – vaccine, infectious disease, or natural (sub-infective) – has the potential to mislead our immune systems in later exposures, and there is no reason to think that Fauci or Big Pharma are going to come up with vaccines that are going to “lead smarter” than our highly evolved natural immune systems, in my scientific opinion.
Basically, it’s as if coronaviruses are excellent attacking boxers which (by evolutionary memory) remember the jabs and punches that “got through” before, and if you waste energy making any of those old moves, you will be “rope-a-doped” by the coronavirus.
Thus, like the viruses, WE have “evolved memory” of how to combat shape-shifters, with our own shape-shifting response, which looks for NEW ATTACKS – not old ones.
What this says to me is that Fauci’s “yesterday’s news” antibody-based vaccine strategy is COMPLETELY WRONG.
One of the things I’ve noticed is Fauci’s reluctance to move on from Original Wuhan vaccines. Yes, we drop our jaws at the mere MENTION of vaccines “tailored” to newer variants, and I totally get the idea of warning about the Fauci “rona-coaster”. I absolutely agree that Fauci is dangling that clearly-planned strategy in front of us as a future narrative talking point.
BUT – at the same time – Fauci seems really intent on pushing vaccination with permanently and massively sub-optimal out-of-date vaccines, which are definitely MISLEADING our immune systems.
Thus, it strikes me that Fauci is trying to get the “worst of both worlds”. He’s not treating GOOD, HIGHLY CURRENT vaccine specificity with the seriousness it deserves. Rather, he is trying to MILK the bad, delta-failing vaccines for all they’re worth.
Something is WRONG here. I think a lot of it has to do with Fauci’s “funding-centric” view of public health. I think he has a distorted set of priorities, based on the extreme compromises that he has made with the industry. It explains remdesivir, and it explains these bad, out-of-date vaccines.
But the bottom line is this. There is clearly more here than Fauci understands, and mandating these CONFIRMED immunity-misleading vaccines over natural immunity is wrong, and possibly – quite possibly – a kind of murderous hubris.
6. The Haxxines Appear to Offer No Benefit When Viewed from All-Cause Mortality
This is a subtle point, but it’s a very effective argument with me, because it does not let anything escape. No matter how hidden the effects – positive or negative – of the vaccines, in the end, all-cause mortality numbers that don’t shift tell me that the vaccines simply aren’t working as a public health policy.
People are very likely trading some slight improvement in risk of death from COVID, for some slight increase in risk of death from haxxine side effects.
Overall? They’re just not doing much good.
No thanks. Not worth it. Demand BETTER VACCINES. Or maybe even a different solution.
5. Vaccination Against Wuhan Made People More Susceptible to Infection by Beta, Gamma, and Delta (But Not Alpha) Variants in the Netherlands
I’m just reporting the study, which is BLUNT evidence of “vaccine-enhanced infection”, a.k.a. VEI.
We will talk more about VEI below, and where it may come from.
TITLE: Increased risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 Beta, Gamma, and Delta variant compared to Alpha variant in vaccinated individuals
ABSTRACT:The extent to which severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC) break through infection- or vaccine-induced immunity is not well understood. Here, we analyze 28,578 sequenced SARS-CoV-2 samples from individuals with known immune status obtained through national community testing in the Netherlands from March to August 2021. We find evidence for an increased risk of infection by the Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), or Delta (B.1.617.2) variants compared to the Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant after vaccination. No clear differences were found between vaccines. However, the effect was larger in the first 14-59 days after complete vaccination compared to 60 days and longer. In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with Beta, Gamma or Delta variants relative to Alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity.
I want to emphasize that last sentence:
In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with Beta, Gamma or Delta variants relative to Alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity.
So, according to this, I made the right choice, not getting vaccinated, in terms of resisting infection with the delta variant. Delta eventually got me, but it likely would have gotten me SOONER if I’d gotten the vaccine – at least that is the prediction I would make based on the results of this study.
Hmmmmmm.
4. Childhood Deaths are Going Up Since They Started Getting The Haxxine
I want to scream “XXXXING MURDERERS”, but I will resist. For now.
TITLE:Deaths among Children are 44% higher than the 5-year-average since they were offered the Covid-19 Vaccine according to ONS data
Yeah, it’s not PROOF, but GOOD GRIEF – it’s one of the most dangerous “correlations that looks a hell of a lot like causation” that I’ve seen in a while.
What if Trump was right, and kids should not be getting this vaccine?
Mandating it? OBVIOUSLY wrong.
I would say this is close to the point where non-violent solutions not only run out of justification, but may in fact be viewed as collaboration with evil.
This is where Christ turns into a “chucker of millstones like asteroids”. This ain’t “smiley Jesus” stuff.
Something is VERY wrong with not only our criminal DOJ, but even with our alleged “white hats” if they’re protecting this shit, worse still, mandating it.
3. COVID Recoverees Are Statistically Better Off Avoiding the Jabs
Karl Denninger was all over this one. Title: “Debate Is Over Folks; Facts Came In”.
There will likely be a lot of arguments over what the results mean, and they will depend upon what your “metrics of success” are.
Karl is of the same opinion as me, that ONLY SEVERE OUTCOMES MATTER with COVID-19. If you get sick and recover, and don’t die or go to the hospital, it’s all OK. Even better if you get good immunity which staves off the NEXT illness out of the deal.
Based on that opinion, the results here would argue that OLDER people who have already gotten the disease, are better off NOT GETTING THE VACCINE, in order to avoid severe outcomes.
I mean haxxine. Whatever.
You will have lower risks if you just stay on the natural immunity track. This is what I figured from all the early studies of COVID-19. It is part of my caution toward vaccines which were explicitly NOT TESTED on recoverees, who were REMOVED from the study populations by the drug companies.
The data is complex and it’s easy to slice it different ways. Here is Karl’s take:
FTA
To summarize:
Natural immunity is more-protective than vaccination and not a little either. It is more than double the effective protection beyond the first two months after being vaccinated. In other words being jabbed not only is a poor second choice in terms of generating immunity it cannot be considered comparable in any way.
In the younger cohorts being jabbed beats being recovered for severe outcomes if you get infected. But when adjusted for odds of infection it loses, badly, beyond the first two months. This is very important because the odds of a severe outcome for a young person are quite low in the first place. In short there is a clean argument that a young person, due to the decay of immunity from the jabs, is better off being infected as their immunity is more-durable and on an infection-risk adjusted basis if previously infected they are less-likely, by quite a lot, to have a severe outcome on a second encounter. This of course ignores early treatment that may reduce severe outcome risk — which nobody who is other than desirous of a large body count would ignore. We haven’t ignored early treatment on purpose have we?
While it is is true that being jabbed after or before infection does indeed reduce the risk of being infected with a third immunity-generating event if you do get infected it has demonstrated negative effectiveness in the recovered cohort when it comes to severe outcomes. It will be very interesting to see how this plays as time goes on because many of these infections occurred quite-recently with Delta and given the known much slower decay of immunity from infection than vaccination there is a confounding factor that, in combination with the low event count, leaves us with a jury that is still out in this specific case.
Given that vaccination after infection increases the risk of severe outcomes over someone with natural immunity if you get a second infection being vaccinated after infection is likely harmful, and not a little either. Getting infected again after infection and then vaccination is a third immunity-generating event. There is no data on this via the natural route (that is, infected, recovered, infected again and recovered, and then infected a third time.) Given the deterioration in protection from severe outcome if infected after recovery and then vaccination, which is quite significant for all except the youngest cohort, it is likely that being infected twice not only produces superior resistance to infection it also avoids the severe outcome risk increase.
Note that none of this includes the risk from the jabs themselves. To the mortality and morbidity (“severe” outcomes) you must also add that which comes directly from the medication, since no drug is ever without said risks.
What is clear is that natural immunity is superior both in terms of protection from repeat infection and from severe outcomes. In addition being boosted had negative or no effectiveness in preventing severe outcomes among everyone except those under 40, where there were too few events to get clean statistical evidence. This implies that vaccinated immunity, when “refreshed”, does not alter the course of a breakthrough infection yet that was the remaining leg on which the argument rested, that it prevented severe outcomes. That should be evident in the data with a significant decrease in severe outcomes across all cohorts and it is not.
What’s worse is that a third event (infection) after recovering and then being jabbed led to increases in severe disease risk if you got a breakthrough, and quite-materially so, over simple recovery.
This argues that jabbing a recovered person, while it may produce apparent superior resistance to infection, is in fact worthless or worse because when adjusted for the severe event risk the reinfection and severe outcome risk is actually HIGHER if you got vaccinated after being infected.
And finally this data also demonstrates that being infected after vaccination produces a materially faster immunity decay than infection alone which is solid evidence that vaccination in fact materially impairs the natural immunity process. That is, aside from direct side effect risk it screws your natural immunity duration when, not if, you get infected after being vaccinated anyway.
WOLF again.
Denninger believes that the results indicate something called VEI – vaccine-enhanced infection.
VEI is basically a broader category that includes ADE – antibody-dependent enhancement – but it doesn’t restrict the disease-enhancing mechanism to antibodies, even though in any complex mechanism, some sort of positive or negative failure by antibodies is almost assuredly involved. Thus, by REMOVING antibodies from the name, VEI prevents arguments from getting sidetracked as to exactly WHY the vaccines are enhancing subsequent infections. VEI means you gave a vaccine which made a subsequent infection WORSE. You can figure out why and whether it’s ADE later.
NOW – let me start off with a CRITICAL SIDEBAR on VEI and where it likely comes from.
FREAKY SIDEBAR ON VEI AND FAUCI’S DIRECT INVOLVEMENT IN ITS APPEARANCE IN BOTH COVID-19 AND VACCINES THEREOF
Denninger’s last point – that vaccination is shown here to “mess up” natural immunity to COVID – doesn’t even get into the very real likelihood that vaccination is ALSO messing up natural immunity to other diseases and possibly cancers. THAT is the stuff that Drs. Cole and Thompson have found in the jabbed. There’s more new evidence of VEI in scientific papers (shocking evidence, actually) which Denninger has covered elsewhere, but set that aside for later. It’s small potatoes compared to the following.
Decreased general immunity TO all diseases and cancers, CAUSED by both the disease and even more so by the vaccines, SEEMS to be one of the huge RISKS (and this actually happened) of having inserted sequences for HIV features into the spike protein during “Bat Woman’s” research, and then by necessity or not, sneakily / stupidly / cunningly, bringing those same features into the vaccines, which – bizarrely – is something that ANTHONY FAUCI apparently holds patents to.
And all of this stuff is related to things that Fauci and his buddies LIED ABOUT and DENIED.
And all of this stuff is stuff that “DRASTIC” missed by a mile, by strawmanning away from it. It’s obvious as hell now why DRASTIC was “supported” by CIA/WaPo, Twitter, and all the usual scoundrels. They’re the “Plan B” to hide Fauci’s and China’s and WEF’s murderous felonies, by “snopesing” us with an accidental misdemeanor that leaves out the more shocking horrors that bring down puppet governments.
Yes. You heard that right. Karen Kingston found this stuff. And I had to watch what she said FIVE TIMES to fully GRASP and ACCEPT what she is saying. I thought she might be exaggerating or leaving out something – some part of this. She’s not. The simple FACTS alone are SHOCKING.
SIDEBAR WITHIN A SIDEBAR
I don’t know if you ever saw the movie Impostor with Gary Sinise, which is based on a short story by Philip K. Dick, but my immediate reaction was the question “Is Anthony Fauci some kind of ‘impostor’ whose goal is to destroy humans on this planet?” I’m not kidding. That was my first thought. Because what he’s doing sure seems like a great way to attack intelligent life on this planet. Just sayin’.
OK – has your jaw dropped yet? Good. It should. I’ll just give you the links and the video. Stew Peters doesn’t really let Karen Kingston explain this in the detail it deserves, so she says things with a brevity that allows for unwarranted doubts to fester.
Karen Kingston needs an hour on OAN with somebody like me or Kirsch or Malone or Denninger to explain things, but she has a huge story here.
Fauci and his crew of science grifters consciously put HIV molecular features [which could, of course, risk HIV-like outcomes] into the spike protein of the more communicable and more dangerous disease, which risked exactly what we are experiencing with the disease, and they didn’t just do it knowingly (as you can READ FROM THE LITERATURE) – they took out patents on doing the same features in vaccines, which makes THEM riskier of the same dangers. And then of course they lied about all of that and tried to cover it up. And to top it off, they supposedly changed patent wording to include accidental and intentional releases for some kind of patentability reason, which makes me wonder what the hell is going on in the Patent Office as well.
And remember those Indian scientists at the beginning who spotted those four “HIV inserts”? Which Fauci and company forced the journal to retract? Yeah, that’s what we’re talking about. That science makes sense now. The evidence is now in VAERS. The evidence is in the patents. THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND THEN THEY LIED ABOUT IT AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.
What the HELL!!!
THIS IS THE GREATEST SCIENTIFIC SCANDAL IN HISTORY.
And oh, yeah, there is an Israeli study that shows worse outcomes in the vaccinated.
NEXT.
2. An Israeli In-Depth Study of a Breakthrough Exposure Outbreak Incident Showed Worse Outcomes For The Vaccinated
This is one that Denninger posted about EARLIER in relation to VEI. And unlike some cases where he hyperventilates, in this case, IMO, it’s MUCH WORSE than Denninger reported.
Going to the ACTUAL PAPERS – if you’re used to reading scientific papers – proved MORE SHOCKING than what Denninger said.
If you look at this, what you see is that the people who were unvaccinated got off much better than the vaccinated. It’s VERY obvious. You can just read it for yourselves – any of those links.
Denninger is able to rant more. Start off with him.
In The Lancet, it’s just mentioned, but the authors are trying, as much as they can get away with in a controlled science press, to WARN people that it’s really a “pandemic of the vaccinated” now.
And in the original Israeli paper, they are also trying very CAREFULLY to warn people that it’s a WORSE PANDEMIC for the vaccinated.
And ALL OF THAT leads me to a BLOG POST where somebody named Herschel Smith spotted something very, very, very telling.
I had no idea WHY Pfizer was doing what they are doing, by not supplying their new COVID drug as a single compound, but rather in a FORCED combination with an AIDS drug.
Well, now THAT all makes sense.
1. Pfizer May Be Sneaking Ritonavir (AIDS Drug) into its COVID Pill To Cover Up Vaccine-Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (VAIDS)
I have no idea if the guy who wrote this blog post, which is ABOUT Denninger’s post on the Israeli letter, is the one who figured this out, or if he just read the idea somewhere else. All I know is that I absolutely think he’s right.
We’ve extensively discussed the damage the vaccine is doing to the immune system, the increased risk of cancer, the pericarditis, and the blood clots and hemorrhaging associated with the shots. Put simply, its side effects are awful. But before that is even considered, they simply don’t work. This from Karl Denninger.
In Israel a nosocomial outbreak was reported involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members. The source was a fully vaccinated COVID-19 patient. The vaccination rate was 96.2% among all exposed individuals (151 healthcare workers and 97 patients). Fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died, the two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease [[4]]
Not just oops, VEI.
Vaccine Enhanced Infections.
This is in The Lancet, a high-quality prestigious medical journal.
Except that I don’t think it’s oops. I think all of this was intended.
See also this. Israel is in real trouble with a veritable blizzard of sickness. Make sure not to miss the fact that the new Pfizer Covid pill has HIV medication in it.
Not, of course, to treat the virus, but to treat the effects of the vaccine.
That’s quite a scam, yes? Develop a shot that harms you for a disease your colleague (Fauci) developed, and then develop the drug that allegedly will make you better from the harm you perpetrated on people to begin with.
Wolf again.
Yes – the Pfizer drug PAXLOVID (good GRIEF – what focus group created THAT name?) includes both a COVID protease inhibitor, PF-07321332, and an older AIDS drug, ritonavir.
Now – Pfizer states a plausible reason to include the HIV drug ritonavir – namely to shut down liver metabolism to increase the concentration of the ACTUAL anti-COVID protease inhibitor PF-07321332.
But really, this just sounds like a paper-thin justification for administering an HIV drug to cover up the HIV-related consequences of the Pfizer vaccine, which stupidly incorporated all of the HIV problems of the Fauci-Wuhan-created SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which stupidly included all the problems of AIDS. Unless it’s not stupidly, but diabolically. Which is even worse. Bloody impostor!
It’s just more drugs, and MORE DRUGS, covering up one “error” with ONE MORE “ERROR”.
Or was this forseeable stuff ever an error to begin with? They KEEP DOING THE WRONG THING. OVER AND OVER. AGAIN AND AGAIN.
As you can see below, this hepatic shutdown action of ritonavir has a long list of potentially dire consequences, much like remdesivir, which is also basically a kidney and liver toxin.
I personally think this is all quite beyond suspicious as hell.
And after all of this crap, why that damned bureaucrat millionaire Fauci is still in his job is beyond me.
So there you have it.
Once you understand that they are selling the disease, the cure, and the cover-up, you can safely say that you want NONE OF THEM.
I want to see Anthony Fauci and Albert Bourla arrested and tried.
That’s what I want. We can talk about vaccines again after that happens.
Fauci and Pfizer have painted themselves into a bit of a corner.
I now believe that they “played a charade” on boosters – that boosters were their intent all along.
I think this WHOLE scam was very intentional.
But it gets far, far worse. I think I see that they have an agenda much bigger than the COVID scam.
And I think I see what that agenda is.
This is very hard to see, but I think that maybe some other people are going to be able to see it, so I’m throwing this out there in hope that those people MIGHT see this.
Let’s go progressively backwards in time.
The LATEST outrage is the Project Veritas revelation – in the words of Pfizer’s own scientists – which really shows you how utterly AMORAL or even IMMORAL the management of Pfizer really is.
Please watch this if you have not already.
H/T Sundance, Deplorable Patriot, and many others.
The big point that you need to get out of this, is that the management of Pfizer is NOT interested in doing the best thing for people. EVERYTHING that you have seen from them – the hiding of the vaccine migration data – the ripping off of countries – the manipulation of FDA against competitor J+J – it’s all confirmed by what Pfizer’s own scientists say.
And to top that all off, these scientists ADMIT what we all knew, and always knew – that natural disease-conferred immunity is SUPERIOR to vaccine immunity.
Likewise, if anybody around here has been as SHOCKED as I am, about how badly ISRAEL is now treating EVERYBODY – Jews, Arabs, whatever – with their draconian mandates and “Vaczi” passports – well, maybe it’s not so much of a surprise.
What a bunch of play-acting. THE DRAMA – IT BURNS.
The HYPOCRISY is meant to DISTRACT from the MESSAGE OF COMPLIANCE that SELLS PRODUCT.
Do you see how the propaganda works here? They think we’re stupid. No. We’re just as wise as the MAGA husband who comes home and finds the wife ISRAEL in bed with A DRUG REP.
OY VEY.
But it gets worse.
This earlier video, which has also been discussed both here and at CTH, has a VERY important point that takes a while to sink in.
Again, please watch this if you have not already.
Or maybe not.
[ NOTE – YouTube video REMOVED – old URL: https://youtu.be/ZwR7natWqLk ]
The biggest point is the final one, which the good doctor starts setting up at 10:00, and which he really gets down to at about 11:00 – that the COVID vaccines are actually SETTING UP BREAKTHROUGH INFECTIONS.
Yes.
I want you to read that again.
It appears that the jabs are making people MORE susceptible to the evolving virus.
This makes TONS of sense from an evolutionary perspective – which is why I have to laugh at all my liberal non-scientist friends who hate God, SWEAR that they believe in evolution, but would never believe what I’m about to tell you.
As you know from my prior discussion of viral evolution…..
OK – we’re going to have some fun here – but stick with me, and you could learn A LOT. Cue the music! Borrowed from Wheatie! Previous posts helped put both the SPIKE PROTEIN DISEASE and the SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE into deep perspective. We were seeing that the SOLUTION was a significant part of the …
…..one of the best ways to look at a virus and one or more hosts, is to see how they all negotiate to a state of equilibrium, which then appears (because it IS) evidence of DESIGN. The design is just at a near-mathematical level – like a program that adapts and installs itself – rather than a cruder model that requires ridiculous microscopic interventions at every possible juncture.
Things work out for the benefit of LIFE, because we live in a PRO-LIFE universe. But the question is exactly HOW that works out. It may not be as SIMPLE in some ways as you think it might be – or conversely it may be SIMPLER.
We’re only humans, and we have a lot to learn.
And we could learn a LOT from space-time distributed, parallel-processed intelligence, a.k.a. LIFE.
Just like all our latest vaccine tech is bad mimicry of natural technology invented at least 70 million years ago (read the article – it’s fascinating), so our latest attempts to immunize ourselves are not even that.
These vaccines, which use our “next tech” but not our “best tech”, are corrupted by human GREED and DUPLICITY. Bluntly, Fauci, Pfizer and Moderna SCAMMED President Trump. They had a terrible motivation to push LITERAL “bleeding edge” vaccines, instead of more obvious and safer vaccines. That motivation was not to solve their phony crisis – it was to usher in gene therapies by using the same technology as a kind of false hero in a pandemic, riding on Trump’s coattails.
They needed “real science” to SHUT THE FUCK UP, while their FAKE SCIENCE cured their FAKE PANDEMIC with a FAKE HERO.
Dr. Nathan Thompson, in the video above, discovered that the vaccines are – at least in some fraction of people – LOWERING general immunity – and this appears from all data to be to everything EXCEPT a single VIRAL VARIANT which is about to SHIFT to a NEW VARIANT. And we now know that even THAT limited immunity wanes rather quickly.
But we knew that. We knew that ALL ALONG.
Go back in time, before Fauci LIED and said that everything we knew was wrong.
We KNEW that you don’t make vaccines to colds – and that you barely make them to the flu. We knew that coronaviruses were problematic. We knew that vaccines to them are plagued with failure, in some cases caused by phenomena like ENHANCEMENT, where the vaccines make catching the disease EASIER or WORSE.
We knew what these viruses are like. We knew what they were like DECADES AGO. And yet, the disgusting MEDIA played us into a state of credulity, where even expert scientists with the most basic and well-grounded knowledge from over a century of virology were not allowed to state the obvious, if it contradicted our rotten, lying CDC.
Something is VERY wrong there.
Stop and think about it.
They are pushing a vaccine that reduces immunity to everything EXCEPT the VERY specific thing they vaccinated you for – which disappears. So the net effect is to make things worse in all possible ways.
Reducing overall immunity is exactly what Trump WARNED US ABOUT.
The cure can’t be worse than the disease.
BUT IT IS.
And I am going to argue that they knew this ALL ALONG.
Take a look at these screen shots.
If you have ANY kind of modern primary care physician, then you get these reports at least once a year, from the lab tests that your doctor orders.
RIGHT? Am I right?
You can actually compare THESE EXACT NUMBERS – not the CD4 and CD8 cells, which are specialized, and you probably don’t get tested for, unless you have AIDS or another immunosuppressive disease – but everything else will show up on YOUR lab results. Sometimes they say “Granulocytes” and sometimes they say “Neutrophils”, etc., but you can look at the “normal” ranges and match things up very nicely.
You can compare YOUR immune results with the ones in the video. But that’s not my point.
YOU KNOW PFIZER WAS DOING – OR COULD EASILY HAVE DONE – BASIC LABS ON THEIR TEST SUBJECTS.
They had to do the basics – right? Maybe not the people in the trials that everybody was watching – maybe they “overlooked the basic tests” very “accidentally” or by some rule – but somewhere, somehow – there is no way that Pfizer didn’t run the most BASIC immune function tests – THAT WE ALL GET – on at least some test subjects – and discover exactly what we are discovering now.
They had to know what was happening, and what this meant.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
If you have a virus, largely created by your friend in NIH, named Fauci, and his friends Baric and Daszak, and their friend Shi in China, and you have a vaccine for it that ONLY CREATES VERY SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES that your friend Fauci focuses on like a hypnotist, but otherwise the vaccines lower immunity and cause disease in general, and this virus changes itself quickly enough that boosters are continuously needed, or maybe only to the point where the vaccine harms immunity enough that the virus doesn’t HAVE to change……
Are you seeing what is happening here?
THE GENERAL LOWERING OF IMMUNITY IS KEY.
This is what counteracts ANY “good” that Fauci focuses on.
These vaccines are the ultimate damned heroin.
COVID vaccines are not heroic. They’re HEROIN.
Let me explain this again, in comparison to NATURAL IMMUNITY.
Natural immunity is the result of EVOLUTION – so it’s SMART. It knows from adaptive experience that a RIFLE SHOT at what just hit you will do no good – but a BLAST from a SHOTGUN will hit the bug the NEXT TIME IT COMES BACK DIFFERENT.
That is why the broad-based but complex immunity conferred by the DISEASE is BETTER than “just a few antibodies specific to yesterday’s villain.”
Nature KNOWS BETTER (by now) than to try to hit the shape-shifter where it was last standing.
Fauci doesn’t know better.
OR DOES HE?
I think he DOES know better.
And I think that Rand Paul, who is VERY SMART, is scaring Fauci because Fauci knows Rand is onto him.
I am no longer thinking these people are stupid.
I think they are very smart.
I think they are RINGERS.
I think they’re up to something.
Making money to continue their program is part of it, but not ALL of it.
They have a goal – the goal is NOT for our benefit.
I believe that these things are components of their agenda.
lower human immunity to disease AND to genetic modification
implement gene therapy as a gateway to genetic modification of humans
increase government’s power to complete medical control of humans
change humanity in a Fabian way – create some socialist human ideal
And THAT takes me back to something Cthulhu said, which has stuck with me.
Fauci was up to something VERY similar with AIDS. He wanted a vaccine desperately. He didn’t want to treat AIDS, but eventually he HAD TO – and when he finally did, it was remdesivir all over again.
And what I’ve come to realize, is that IF there had been a “working” vaccine for HIV / AIDS that worked anything like these terrible coronavirus vaccines, that vaccine would have LOWERED HUMAN IMMUNITY in the same dubious strategy – as the “prevention” for a disease that lowers immunity.
Do you see how WRONG and WEIRD that is?
You know – something is just “not right” with all this.
I’m not taking this vaccine. And I sure as hell hope YOU aren’t taking it either.
It is my opinion now that not only is there a problem with ADE (antibody-dependent enhancement) with the vaccines…..
Not only have they been hiding ADE with the vaccines…..
The vaccines were created BECAUSE they were expected to show ADE.
Beyond that, I believe that EITHER the vaccines were expected to create the “scariants”, or variants were to be created and released to “lead” the virus. Either way, it leads to the same outcome.
ADDICTION TO VACCINES
This is a communist dream – to ENSLAVE humanity to some drug.
You need to understand this point:
Vaccine dependence at the end of the ADE road is not a bug. It’s a feature.
HUGE news today. The article that I was going to write about “I think they’re hiding immune enhancement” no longer needs to be written. They ARE hiding immune enhancement. Gail Combs alerted me to this video this morning – it is a must-watch. If you know who is talking – Robert Malone – then you …
Recognition by America, Cyber-Suppression By China
OK, people – I’m being conservative here. There MAY be evidence of immune enhancement in the UK data, but I’m not seeing it. What I am seeing, however, is that – viewed very roughly – deaths from COVID in the UK are now pretty much independent of vaccination status.
And these are THEIR numbers, not mine.
And presumably, this is due to IMMUNE ESCAPE. As predicted by that Italian vaccine expert (see below) who used to work for Bill Gates and CEPI (same thing), who came out on Twitter and said “don’t mass vaccinate in a pandemic”.
And presumably also predicted by Bill Gates and other vaccine pushers with hidden agendas, but that’s all speculation as to motive. The DATA, however, is not speculation.
I was led to this data by an interesting path that is worth documenting.
First, I was reading comments on one of the most excellent articles ever written on Coronavirus fascism and the push back against it.
I absolutely urge you to read this article. It is a CALL TO ARMS. LINKED ARMS.
People are rising up against the LIES of the Corona Commies, and this article documents all the flip-flop lies.
Back to the story. THIS story. Unpacking one more lie.
There was a comment on the article that I found very interesting.
AL Tru
Research Reveals Vaccinated People More Vulnerable to Delta Variant Than Unvaccinated:
“ The UK government agency Public Health England published a report on Friday that officials who are trying to push the Covid-19 vaccine upon the rest of the world do not want people to see. Data contained within their report revealed people who have received the Covid-19 vaccine are more vulnerable to the Delta variant than those who have not been vaccinated. Their briefing titled “SARS-Cov-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England,” investigated every variant of covid-19 that is currently known. The information contained in the report showed that people who received the covid-19 shot are more than three times likely to die than those who have not received the vaccine. Out of 117 people who died over a time period of four weeks, 73 of them had received the covid-19 vaccine. That means 63 percent of those who died from the Delta variant had been vaccinated. Information within the chart that can be found on pages 13 and 14 of the report revealed that one of the people who died received their first dose of the covid-19 vaccine within three weeks of when they died. 19 of them had been vaccinated more than three weeks before they died. 50 of the people who died during the four week time span had received both doses of the covid-19 vaccine.”
MOLOGIC Corp. – Bill Gates and George $oros. the new Covid rapid test.
$oylent Greed
There was no link, but bypassing this problem by a handy method which you may guess but which I will not reveal, I found the source.
This blog post was not afraid to link to sources (thank you), even though I remain skeptical of the post itself (more on that in a moment), since I think the conclusions may not be warranted, and without the author showing work, I do NOT come to the same conclusions.
Well, there are LINKS right in the article to the ACTUAL DATA, so why not check it out?
There is a LOT of interesting data here, and I think that guys like Alex Berensen will get a LOT out of it.
I don’t see how the data prove a factor of three worse for the vaccinated. Let me show what is said.
The key claim is this:
The information contained in the report showed that people who received the covid-19 shot are more than three times likely to die than those who have not received the vaccine.
Out of 117 people who died over a time period of four weeks, 73 of them had received the covid-19 vaccine. That means 63 percent of those who died from the Delta variant had been vaccinated. Information within the chart that can be found on pages 13 and 14 of the report revealed that one of the people who died received their first dose of the covid-19 vaccine within three weeks of when they died. 19 of them had been vaccinated more than three weeks before they died. 50 of the people who died during the four week time span had received both doses of the covid-19 vaccine.
Here is the data itself, from the UK report.
Without digging too deeply, some thoughts.
the “3-fold” assertion by the author doesn’t seem to account for the fact that most people in England are vaccinated, even though the level is not as high as Israel (roughly 70% vs. roughly 90%). Maybe I’m reading this wrong, but I’m just not seeing it.
Even the correlation with numbers of shots seems merely to reflect numbers of the fully and partially vaccinated available for infection (I’m just guessing at rough numbers for any cumulative process).
However, very shockingly, I’m not seeing any kind of protection from death, by vaccination status, either way. THAT matches immune escape.
England is mostly delta variant now, so the assertion by authorities and Branch Covidians that people are protected against death from delta by the vaccines seems sketchy if we’re kind, FRAUDULENT if we’re more blunt, and most likely propaganda to keep vaccinating.
the “3-fold” assertion DOES in fact match the roughly 3-fold ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated in the UK (documented HERE by the UK authorities), and thus one can make a very simple argument that the data are showing UK nakedness to the delta variant when the metric is simply DEATH by COVID.
I sure would love to see data on not just the unvaccinated, but the RECOVERED, because I suspect they’re like the Israeli data showing the superiority of disease-conferred immunity – otherwise known as the 1970’s logic that you don’t create vaccines for colds – you catch them, treat them, and don’t use them cynically to install “communism with Western characteristics”.
Sweden is looking good – WHY? – my guess is because of large numbers of the NATURALLY IMMUNE. Lockdown stalled natural immunity elsewhere. This even explains the “corrected” Australian data. The world is a laboratory now, rich in data.
Bottom line, I think we need to go back to that virologist / epidemiologist with ties to CEPI (Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche) who posted on Twitter – the guy who said that mass vaccination into a pandemic was a mistake.
We are DEFINITELY seeing immune escape. Put all your money on it.
Are we also seeing immune enhancement? I am tempted to bet big on THAT, too. And even if NOT right now, it only takes one Wuhan Institute and one nearby Chinese prison full of human guinea pigs to find the perfect variant to make immune enhancement a fast and effective reality.
Sociobiological warfare is a bit slower than flat-out biological warfare, but it’s very hard to stop.
I believe that Dr. Vanden Bossche was being honest, and now I believe he was RIGHT.
Excellent updates on his website – I urge you to check them out (specific links below).
If you don’t TRUST the UK stats, there is one more possibility. They could be HIDING immune enhancement by selectively dropping out data. I view it as entirely possible that they chose to hide the vaccine-halting horrors of immune enhancement by quietly admitting to mere immune escape, and hoping we would pick that up, as I have done here. I have no proof, nor any indications, but others may find some telltale evidence in the data, or elsewhere.
That is the ultimate TL;DR – the title. You can take that and walk away with an understanding of the situation in three parts.
Want to know more? Stick around. It’s a coming post. But I want people to get the TL;DR NOW, before Monday, because things are going to start popping HARD.
WHAT’S COMING
The left, the Bidenoids, China, the controllers, the globalists, the industry profiteers, and the scammers have NO WAY TO GO BUT FORWARD.
Getting vaccinated is the most important thing you can do to protect yourself and the people around you from the Delta variant of COVID-19. Find a free vaccine near you at https://t.co/4MYpWqXVVo.
— President Biden Archived (@POTUS46Archive) July 25, 2021
Anybody who wants to avoid the HELL they have planned, both SOCIAL and BIOLOGICAL, has NO WAY TO GO BUT OFF THEIR TRAIN.
If’ you’re wondering why this guy (below) was picking up signals of potential SHTF, my guess is that is is due to an upcoming information collision.
I believe that smart people associated with the military are picking up scientific speculation about vaccine problems, and realizing that this conflicts with their knowledge of Bidenese commitment to jabbing all Americans.
Jabbing them with vaccines that increase morbidity toward the future of an evolving disease.
It’s a relativity problem in disease. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. I think the ChiComs SAW IT.
This situation has to be at the top of CCP’s wish list for America.
Recent information is pretty much confirming all levels of skepticism about the vaccines. The BIG PICTURE is exactly where and how they fail, due to SHIFTING BACKGROUND of the disease, however that happens, which doesn’t matter. It could be natural. It could be China. It could be ANYBODY. This is a “beautiful attack”. It’s a case of forcing the victim to self-destruct.
Biology we understood in the 1960s, before the Soviet/Maoist takeover of media, education, science, etc., is still operating.
You don’t make a vaccine for a cold, because it’s HARD, UNNECESSARY, and they all have PROBLEMS.
American science, industry and government were all WEAPONIZED TO OVERREACH. To run their blade of modernization through air, and then through themselves.
Democrats are fakers, scammers, and con artists of the highest order. If you THINK they are doing something stupid, you had best reevaluate – they are almost certainly doing something EVIL and covering it up with something that’s merely stupid.
The above is AUBERGINE’S RAZOR – a wonderful formulation by QTreeper Aubergine of my earlier RANT against Hanlon’s Razor.
a guest post by our dear house guardian Suspicious Cat NOTE FROM WOLF: This post may require some explanation. After allowing my somewhat mythical and somewhat not mythical sister Fox Moon to have her guest post, our dear pet Suspicious Cat has demanded to have his post, too.You see, Suspicious Cat considers himself to be …
Hanlon’s razor is the old saw, behind which Democrats hide, that says, more or less, to never attribute to malice what can be attributed to incompetence or stupidity. Under some circumstances, that may be reasonable, but “never” is utterly WRONG and DANGEROUS, and in my opinion makes Hanlon’s razor a “false aphorism” designed to protect the smartly wicked.
In considering HOW Democrats fool us, I just had a wonderful realization about ONE MORE WAY in which they do it – by following a kind of twisted form of a MAGIC ACT.
A magic act has THREE parts. The PLEDGE. The TURN. And the PRESTIGE.
First, let’s see how this is used in magic – from a truly great movie – THE PRESTIGE.
Thus, there are THREE PARTS to a magic act.
The Pledge – something ordinary but now suspect is offered for inspection
The Turn – something extraordinary happens to the pledged object
The Prestige – an even more confounding return of the pledged object happens
Now one can leave off the prestige, but this is most often done as a SERIES of pledges and turns, CAPPED at the end by a very dramatic prestige.
In the Democrat game, however, the PRESTIGE is replaced by the GOTCHA.
The GOTCHA is critical. It disappears ONLY if some rascal in the audience calls it out before we’re deep in the TURN.
The PLEDGE is also shrewder than in a magic act. It is offered as REALITY – not as a possible trick. It can be offered coyly, or brazenly, but it is always offered innocently.
The TURN is offered seductively, to bait the mark fully into it.
The Pledge – some typical Democrat scam is offered, brazenly or innocently, but deceivingly
The Turn – something unexpected happens to the Democrat scam
The Gotcha – something even WORSE happens because of the turn
A perfect example of this was NanXi’s trap for Deplorables on January 6.
The Pledge – Deplorables can protest the bad electors at Capitol Hill! Really! Stop The Steal!
The Turn – Fake MAGA and FBI informants create a phony riot on Capitol Hill! But no fair!
The Gotcha – Treasonous FIB chases hoodwinked Deplorables down as “insurrectionists”
The TRICK here is to always make the SUCKER go too deeply into THE TURN. You HAVE to be careful. Democrats will always try to lure us too deeply into the Turn. It’s our job not to go there.
NOW – the reason I’m cautioning here, is because I am very suspicious of this bullshit about three Texas Democrats who flew on a plane without masks, thereby getting COVID.
I’m sorry – this is not passing the Wolf Smell Test.
THIS.
JUST.
SOUNDS.
LIKE.
PLEDGE.
AND.
TURN.
Let’s look at this sucker closely.
THE PLEDGE – Democrats perform a typical dastardly Democrat deed that draws attention from all the fist-shaking MAGA. The outrage! It burns!
THE TURN – Great and WONDERFUL KARMA befalls those DASTARDLY DEMS – provided we accept all of the following:
Democrats are honest and really told us the truth
Dems have NO motive in bragging up stupidity leading to COVID KARMA
A bunch of mask Karen Dems wore NOT A SINGLE MASK on that plane by random chance
PCR tests worked GREAT and didn’t give us some false or “on-demand” positives by being cooked too long
Vaccines are not working because of some Democrat propaganda reason – for example – that the “unvaccinated are infecting the vaccinated” – their latest bullshit
sick and exposed Dems now have a legitimate reason not to come back into legislative session
Do you see how this works? That last one – THAT is just the CLINCHER for me.
Already, going into the TURN, things are looking SKETCHY. Just like they did to me on January Sixth.
WOLF and SUSPICIOUS CAT for the WIN.
SO – what would be next?
THE GOTCHA – Democrats use these three cases – to which we have “pledged” – as propaganda mills.
For example:
all three say that they didn’t have bad symptoms, credit the vaccine, and then justify vaccines as “preventing hospitalization and death”
all three claim it’s the horrible dangerous delta variant that must be stopped
Democrats say this proves that masks work, and demand remasking by CHUMPS like DeWine
Joe Biden and Facebook conclude their phony fake wrestling act with DRACONIAN censorship
Are y’all seeing how this works?
For a cheap fake hit on Dems, we PLEDGED LIKE CHUMPS.
Democrats NEVER give us this kind of easy victory unless there is a huge defeat for us, waiting behind it.
The omicron epidemic is being driven by young, vaccinated people, according to mounting data from countries as diverse as the UK, Denmark and South Africa 
(@RacyItalian) 
