Delta Wolf

After a lost week of human self-experimentation to survive multiply mutated Fauci-Baric China Virus, Wolf has obtained answers to a thousand questions. Here are just a few of those answers.

Over the last week, overcoming my SECOND case of the China virus, I have been able to learn quite a bit about the enemy’s weaponry – AND our own.

I was READY this time. PREPARATION paid off, and big-league.

I tried to help others prepare, and ended up helping myself, too.

Ivermectin – The Preparation

OK, people. It is time for THE WOLF to GET PATTON ON YOUR ASSES. As you may know, we now have many of our dear members actively fighting COVID-19, including one (gil00) in the hospital. Several have received Regeneron. Thus far, praise God, we have not lost anybody – and I intend to keep it …

I felt it was important to share what I have learned, and to answer people’s questions, but I wanted to have enough strength to actually do a post – not just a few quick answers lost in the middle of conversations.

I have answered a few questions already – I will try to link to some of those answers. Other answers I may copy here. But most of these questions are being answered here for the first time.

HERE WE GO!

1. Which version of COVID-19 did I have?

singingsoul1(@singingsoul1) Online Wolverine Reply to Wolf Moon December 3, 2021 19:46

Wolf is that [omicron] the strain you and your wife caught? I am wondering since you did not respond as well to Ivermectin?

Where did you catch the first virus covid and where do you think you caught the second virus? You caught two different strains?

What I had this time was almost certainly Delta.

What I had the first time was almost certainly a minor variant of the original Wuhan strain (COVID-19).

Here is the current worldwide geographic distribution according to NextStrain.

Note that the colors are not fixed – the same data may be shown with different colors from one day to the next.

The turquoise color which covers 2/3 to 3/4 of almost every pie chart across the planet is the Delta variant. You can see that it has rapidly become the predominant version.

The various grayish versions (1/4 to 1/3 of each pie) are basically the original Wuhan strains PLUS the gazillion minor morphs of THAT which formed immediately. You remember the “European strain” and the “Washington strain”, and the “New York”, “Italian”, etc. – those were all still basically Wuhan, and those are the variants that are still effectively treated by all the original vaccines and antibodies.

If things had stayed there, the vaccinated would largely not be having breakthrough cases right now. Similarly, I would not have had a “breakthrough case” on my natural immunity.

The purplish and orange versions are other minor variants of concern, some of which were once much bigger concerns, until delta began to predominate. The vaccines still held up fairly well against those, as did, apparently, my natural immunity.

Omicron (red) is barely on the map right now.

It is EXTREMELY unlikely that I had omicron. It is VERY likely that I had standard issue delta variant.

2. How do I know that I had COVID-19?

Within a 24 hour period, I was positive to three tests – TWO antigen tests (BinaxNOW and QuickVue), plus a PCR test run by my primary care physician’s group.

The same tests showed my wife to be negative on Day Zero and Day One of my infection.

However, LATER, on Day 4 of my case, another run of QuickVue showed my wife to be weakly positive.

In my opinion, and with as much experience as I have now, running them, these antigen tests are highly reliable and trustworthy.

But that’s just the beginning.

My new case was, in so many ways, almost identical to the case that I had in January 2020. That case predated the availability of tests. Also, because it predated antibody test availability, I never got an antibody test until 6 months later – which by then was negative.

But now I’m CERTAIN. I had COVID the first time. Same damn disease. THE SAME.

And it all makes sense. DELTA BREAKTHROUGH IS possible for Wuhan natural immunity, IMO. Maybe not for everybody, but it was for me.

3. Did ivermectin work for me?

I strongly suspect that ivermectin helped me avoid serious problems and recover quickly.

I cannot be sure that ivermectin actually helped, but it certainly didn’t hurt. I would be very tempted to use ivermectin again, if I got COVID again.

My wife also used ivermectin, and it seemed to “flatten the curve” of viral load for her, too.

I would be bullshitting to say that I know ivermectin helped, or that my case “proves that it works.” But I can easily say that I strongly suspect that it helped.

4. Did I have any side effects from ivermectin?

Yes, but the side effects were extremely minor, for as massively high of a dose as I was taking.

I decided to roughly follow the FLCCC “triple-dose” (0.6 mg/kg) recommendation for an active infection, because I had two of the conditions that cause FLCCC to recommend the highest dose – (1) likelihood of delta strain, and (2) multiple comorbidities.

I decided that the same applied to my wife.

To mitigate side effects, I did NOT take the daily amount in a single dose, but rather spread it out in 12-mg pill-pops during the day. But even with the spreading of the doses, and taking them with meals, I felt the following symptoms.

desire to sleep after meals
“lazy eye focus” for a few hours
stomach “not quite right”

None of this was bad enough to quit the drug, or even to reduce the dose, but after 5 days of it, I was absolutely done. I had ZERO desire to take ivermectin any more. I wanted my stomach to return to normal, even if that entailed a greater risk. Given that most of my other symptoms were gone, I didn’t feel like it was much of a risk.

Also, ivermectin has a pretty long half-life, so after 5 days of super-high-dosing it, I’m probably STILL flushing it out of my system.

My wife experienced the same stomach issues. She was ready to give it up after 6 days.

5. What about the Zelenko / Raoult protocols?

Yes. I credit azithromycin every bit as much as ivermectin, and I have more direct evidence that it helped me.

This is where the reasoning gets very complicated.

In early 2020, I was immediately impressed by the work of Didier Raoult (hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin) and later by the clinical real-world proof of Zev Zelenko (added zinc and moved treatment to outpatient prophylaxis). I was absolutely convinced that early azithromycin was key to stopping the killer pulmonary symptoms of the disease, and basically turned it into “just another weak, influenza-like coronavirus”.

Although it turns out that azithromycin has its own powerful antiviral activities, the main thing it did, in my opinion then and now, was to prevent any type of pneumonia from setting in. This is critical if you want to stay out of the hospital.

Thus, as soon as I started detecting what I considered scary lung issues (burning lungs, basically), which was almost immediately (end of day zero, middle of day one), I decided to begin TWO ADDITIONAL PROTOCOLS.

The first was a modified Zelenko protocol. I increased my zinc to my maximum levels ever taken, plus quercetin as natural capers (clearly the bad influence of Aubergine). My wife and I also began using elderberry syrup as an additional zinc ionophore.

However, the real key was adding azithromycin – 2 days at 500 mg, and 2 days at 250 mg. The very first dose resulted in an immediate improvement in my lungs.

There is simply no arguing against the clinical record of success of the Zelenko protocol. I trusted it in my scientific reasoning in 2020, and I trusted it to treat myself.

I get far more mileage out of real-world clinical studies like Raoult’s and Zelenko’s, than out of Fauci’s little “double-blind” – whoops – I mean “double-chump” scam studies that can be manipulated against both doctor and patient by lying, phony, deceptive, agenda-filled, biased, compromised, fake-neutral parties.

The whole idea of double-blind studies falls apart when the researchers and patients are innocent DUPES and CHUMPS, and the people who are supposed to be honest referees in charge of neutrality are in fact dishonest manipulators like NIH, CDC, CEPI, Gates, WHO, and all the rest.

In contrast, studies like Zelenko’s and Raoult’s are pretty much open source. No Fauci-type con-man is in charge of fake neutrality. This being a neutrality I have little care for anyway, because I don’t care what exactly saved the people – simply that they were saved.

Yeah – I’m biased in favor of MEDICINE ITSELF.

The protocol works, end of story.

Fauci’s “studied ignorance” of clinical success is exactly why the man should have been fired DECADES AGO. He’s not a doctor – not a patient-treating one – and he should not be in charge of doctors.

HOWEVER – I do have to admit – azithromycin was even harder on my gut than ivermectin. Four days was all I could take. My stomach was always double-queasy if I took AZM with my IVM. There was NO WAY I was going to do a fifth day.

But YES – the stuff worked, and IMO kept my lungs “infection-free”, knock on wood.

Thank you, Doctors Raoult and Zelenko!!!

6. What about antihistamines?

Absolutely. The same well-proven clinical success that Zelenko had with azithromycin, was also evident in the results from the Spanish nursing homes. It would have been negligent not to take an antihistamine, in my opinion.

That, plus some additional reasoning I will explain below.

Based on the recommendations of people here, I chose Claritin (loratadine), and quickly found that I tolerated it easily at the recommended double doses.

I experienced a very, very slight dryness of the mouth, but that’s it. Just to be careful, I tended to keep the dosing closer to 1.5 instead of double, but in the absence of all the other drugs I was taking, I would have been more rigorous about the double dose, without consequence.

For those who need a refresher on the use of antihistamines against COVID…..

The Zyrtec Rebellion

Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …

Now – here is some important new reasoning I had.

In the FLCCC protocols, and the Zelenko protocols, there is very little if any “over-the-counter” patient control in terms of things which could possibly pre-address and prevent the “cytokine storm” problem – particularly any drug that is available on an outpatient, OTC basis.

In the FLCCC protocols, aspirin is the main anti-clotting drug with something approaching that function. In the original Raoult and Zelenko protocols, HCQ’s antirheumatic functions combined with azithromycin’s actions seemed to suppress pulmonary capillary clotting, although neither did so as well as steroids.

The fact is, however, that the Spanish nursing home study had extremely good success preventing cytokine storms by simply using antihistamines on ALL patients, both as treatment and as prophylaxis. The entire emphasis of the approach was not so much to prevent disease, as to simply limit the disease.

To me it was a no-brainer to add an antihistamine to prevent inflammatory clotting – something that I knew already I was susceptible to, because of my first case of COVID, after which I lost lung function.

Loratadine turned out to be a VERY high-bang-for-buck fix for me, because it also dried nasal and sinus secretions, helped my breathing, reduced lung congestion, and generally decreased symptoms.

Thus, I found that adding an antihistamine had both clearly observable short-term benefits, and very likely long-term benefits.

I highly recommend adding this protocol during COVID treatment. It’s completely OTC as well – the Medical Mafia in Washington simply can’t stop it.

7. What about aspirin?

LINK: https://www.jpost.com/health-and-wellness/aspirin-lowers-risk-of-covid-new-findings-support-preliminary-israeli-trial-681127

Absolutely. Aspirin is a “must”, IMO.

Multiple studies have showed that aspirin, even at low doses, is both protective against getting COVID-19 and also protective against hospitalization and death. The numbers are substantial, too.

This is, again, part of the FLCCC protocol, and pretty much a no-brainer.

I started off using half a regular aspirin, but quickly found that it was just one more drug beating on my stomach.

Switching to low-dose aspirin worked nicely to make any stomach symptoms go away. I also found that I did not need more than 1 or 2 low-dose baby aspirins to control fever. I was able to routinely drop my fever back to near-normal with either 81 mg or 162 mg of aspirin.

Now, my doctor’s practice recommended acetominophen in case I had a high fever, but I never came close to needing it. As it was, I did not want to risk my liver in ANY WAY with all the other high drug doses, so there was NO WAY I was going to add dangerous acetominophen to the mix.

According to the literature studies, even a single baby aspirin per day was enough to show the protective effect. Thus, I made sure to always take 81-325 mg aspirin per day, and will continue with at least 81 mg/day for some time to be determined.

8. What about HCQ?

Not this time, but I would not rule it out in the future – particularly in the absence of ivermectin.

When I got my ivermectin, I had the opportunity to get hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as well. I chose the latter, but decided not to bother with HCQ I would likely not use.

I let ivermectin be my “drug of choice” for fighting COVID, for many reasons, including the greater safety profile and better understanding by doctors’ groups, including FLCCC. I am satisfied that I made the right choice in ivermectin, but quite frankly, it would have been a good thing to have some HCQ on hand as well.

Anything that kills viruses, is better than their “stupidity of spike identity” vaccine.

9. Did I gargle?

Yes. I used FLCCC-recommended and study-backed Listerine “with essential oils”, and the benefits were obvious.

Actually, ALL the Listerine variations use the same “essential oils” – pick any of them. Some of the time, I used one that also packs zinc chloride, to really screw with the virus.

At first, I went with warm saturated sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) gargle, which was the gargle used by the Spanish nursing homes.

Warm bicarb is actually a really good solution, in terms of soothing the throat and decreasing viral load (as experienced through reduction of key symptoms), but it doesn’t really do a lot in terms of opening up breathing passages.

In contrast, Listerine gargle was EXCELLENT for helping to clear breathing passages, AND to decrease viral load in the throat and mouth. The beneficial effects even extended to the lungs. I only needed to do it 2 or 3 times a day, and the effects lasted for hours afterwards.

The Listerine gargle was also excellent before sleeping, to have a peaceful night’s rest, with clear breathing.

In my opinion, the gargling protocol is really key to helping end things quickly.

NOW – there is some difference between what I experienced and what FLCCC recommends. FLCCC only recommends (at the moment) Listerine for prevention – they DROP IT for early treatment, and recommend ONLY the other types of antiseptics (cetylpyridinium, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine) once you get the disease. Yet, honestly, I was totally satisfied with the performance of Listerine for TREATMENT, and would not hesitate to use it again.

This may be an individual thing. As they say, your mileage may vary.

10. What about povidone-iodine gargle?

I didn’t use it this time, but I may very well try it next time!

I was not aware that you can just buy this stuff OTC, but yeah – it’s a product. In the studies I read, povidone-iodine was THE BEST in lowering viral load in patients. It did better than Listerine – not by a whole lot, but enough that it might be worth it.

So if you can’t stand Listerine of any kind, or Scope, or whatever – consider trying this one.

11. Did I get the monoclonal antibodies?

Yes. In “better late than never” fashion, I got the mAb infusion after the treatment with ivermectin and azithromycin was already finished, and my fever was gone.

I was fever-free when I got the antibodies, and fever free when I left the infusion center. Shortly after that, I became exhausted and had a fever again. In another 24 hours, my strength was back and the fever was gone yet again.

Basically, I was treating Delta with more Wuhan antibodies like my own, which had already only provided some protection.

I cannot really be sure if the antibodies helped. I personally found that they knocked me out, increased my fever, and made me suffer a “day of exhaustion” that I had otherwise MISSED thanks to ivermectin.

Were they beneficial? Possibly, but I can’t be certain.

My wife got the antibodies somewhat earlier in the progress of the disease, because she got them at the same time I did, but her case was tracking mine LATE by roughly four days.

The antibodies didn’t completely finish her case, but she really only had one more day of disease after the “antibody down day”.

I would say that antibody infusion was far more likely to have helped HER than it was to have helped ME.

If I had to choose between antibodies, aspirin, loratadine, azithromycin, and ivermectin, I’m not actually sure which one I would toss. I consider EACH of them, just one more tool to make sure the disease stays contained. Use as many as you can get.

12. So what happened to my “natural immunity”?

Try some “AND” logic.

It’s still there – waiting patiently for a disease that no longer exists.

This blurry snapshot from NextStrain is from a “play mode” view of the data, where you can watch the genetic data being added in accelerated time. I have focused the active band on early 2020. The “19” and “20” strains are pre-delta – they were well within the window of my natural immunity, which was probably generated by a strain within what they are now calling 19A.

Follow the evolution forward in time, and you can see the massive shift to delta versions, shown in turquoise and indigo below.

SO – what I have now is DOUBLE natural immunity to TWO HUGE CHUNKS of older/existing COVID-19/20/21/22, the now-rare “gray” stuff and the very common “blue-green” stuff.

You can see, though, where OMICRON in RED is now forming. Whether I have any, some, or no immunity to omicron is an open question. HOWEVER, I would much rather have combined natural immunity to TWO groups of COVID variants, than three, four, or even five vaccines.

We have to start being very scientific about immunity, including in particular natural immunity, which is IMO the BEST response to highly mutating diseases, just as it has ALWAYS been.

Fauci is gaslighting us. Ignore him.

Until the poisonous dwarf is removed from power, do your own science.

https://youtu.be/p_yOSM7ujM0

Start HERE:

This link in particular, to keep checking up on SARS-CoV-2 – an EVOLVING GROUP OF VIRUSES.

https://nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/global

W

Moar AND Logic — Vaccines

a guest post by Gail Combs

(with a FREE SPEECH preface by Wolf Moon)

PREFACE

I want to tell you all something RIGHT UP FRONT.

I have not read this post AT ALL. And I’m not going to read it. I’m going to publish it, and THEN READ IT.

WHY AM I DOING THIS, YOU MIGHT ASK.

It is very simple. I support free speech, and I am especially concerned about CENSORSHIP of viewpoints on vaccination. I am personally pro-vaccination, but I think that the anti-vaxxers have found a WEALTH of valid concerns that need to be addressed by a combination of objective and imaginative investigation, honest admission, political enlightenment, and consumer CHOICE.

The COMMUNISTS in America are NOT doing it right. The real question is WHY NOT?

Vaccines are a PRODUCT – not a CHEMICAL TATTOO that the state has a right to force upon our bodies. GET REAL. Vaccines need the FREE MARKET to prove their worth – not socialist coddling of substandard products to be forced upon us like poisonous Chinese dog treats.

If you are old enough to remember the vaccine SANITY that we had in America before the sabotage presidency of crypto-socialist BILL CLINTON and his horrible co-President wife Hillary Clinton, of WACO fame, then you realize that all of this CRAP about vaccines is utterly unnecessary.

Let us just GO BACK TO WHAT WORKED BEFORE COMMUNISM.

M-KAY?

NOW – I believe that Adam Schiff is starting a “war on anti-vaxxers” in preparation to “war on Trump’s base”. I will be posting more about this soon. But before that, I’m going to let some FREE SPEECH about vaccination happen HERE AND NOW.

Enjoy!

-WOLF MOON

Moar AND Logic — Vaccines

by Gail Combs

GENERAL COMMENT

Perhaps the hardest concept for Americans to learn is Our Ruling Class views us with contempt. They do not hate us. To hate you have to view a person as an equal. The Ruling Class does not consider us equals, some do not even consider us ‘human’!!! We are just ‘Human Resources’ for them to use as they please. Once you realize they view us as free range slaves or cattle (chattel) their inhumane treatment of us becomes comprehensible and this plays into their views on vaccination. As long as THEY make money and the ‘Human Resource’ losses are ‘acceptable’ they don’t care if we are injured or die.

This is the best overall explanation I have seen of what we face in America today:

July 16, 2010 America’s Ruling Class — And the Perils of Revolution by Angelo M. Codevilla

“…No prominent Republican challenged the ruling class’s continued claim of superior insight, nor its denigration of the American people as irritable children who must learn their place. The Republican Party did not disparage the ruling class, because most of its officials are or would like to be part of it.

Never has there been so little diversity within America’s upper crust. Always, in America as elsewhere, some people have been wealthier and more powerful than others. But until our own time America’s upper crust was a mixture of people who had gained prominence in a variety of ways, who drew their money and status from different sources and were not predictably of one mind on any given matter….

Today’s ruling class, from Boston to San Diego, was formed by an educational system that exposed them to the same ideas and gave them remarkably uniform guidance, as well as tastes and habits. These amount to a social canon of judgments about good and evil, complete with secular sacred history, sins (against minorities and the environment), and saints. Using the right words and avoiding the wrong ones when referring to such matters — speaking the “in” language — serves as a badge of identity….

The two classes have less in common culturally, dislike each other more, and embody ways of life more different from one another than did the 19th century’s Northerners and Southerners — nearly all of whom, as Lincoln reminded them, “prayed to the same God.” By contrast, while most Americans pray to the God “who created and doth sustain us,” our ruling class prays to itself as “saviors of the planet” and improvers of humanity. Our classes’ clash is over “whose country” America is, over what way of life will prevail, over who is to defer to whom about what….”

We have already noted the consolidation of the trans-national corporations.

Daniel Estulin in his Bilderberg Speech at EU Parliament says:

“Bilderberg organization is dynamic…. Members come and go, but the system itself has not changed. It is a self-perpetuating system, a virtual spider web of interlocked financial, political, economic and industry interests. Not One World Government or New World Order as too many people mistakenly believe. Rather, the ideology is of a ONE WORLD COMPANY LIMITED….
The idea behind each and every Bilderberg meeting is to create what they themselves call THE ARISTOCRACY OF PURPOSE between European and North American elites on the best way to manage the planet. In other words, the creation of a global network of giant cartels, more powerful than any nation on Earth, destined to control the necessities of life of the rest of humanity, obviously from their vantage point, for our own good and in our benefit – THE GREAT UNWASHED AS THEY CALL US.

In this 2/29/2016 video OT Ben Stein call Trump people the “unwashed”

Later in the year, on 08/26/2016
PeterStrzok texted “Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support…”
Page replys “Yep….”

Obama’s Science Czar, John Holdren certainly agrees and takes it a step further. He thinks it takes ” essential early socializing experiences”aka brainwashing to “ultimately develop into a human being.” GEE, does that mean IF you do not have the CORRECT ‘ socializing experiences’ you are not human?

Holdren, wrote on page 235 in “Human Ecology,” (1973) co-authored with Paul and Anne Ehrlich.

The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being,”

More bizarre quotes: link

Michaelh made a comment on June 12, 2019 at 02:22
The interesting part of the comment is this:

….He told the other doctor he could solve his problem, but the other doc was skeptical. Later he saw the woman in question and she went on at length about the dangers of vaccines and all the information she had gathered online, listening to her intently and patiently the whole time. At the end of it he asked a simple question, “Have you considered whether the anti-vax information you have is a Chinese and Russian disinformation campaign designed to weaken the United States’ populace?” She experienced a mind-blown moment. He said after that she came with all of her children ever single time right on the vax schedule….

Please note this doctor DID NOT ADDRESS the core problem — the perceived dangers of vaccines — Instead he substituted one FEAR for another FEAR.

So let’s back-up and ask the questions that doctor did not address.
WHY would the woman have:

#1. Distrust in the US government
#2. Distrust in the pharmaceutical companies
#3. Does her fear have a solid foundation?

Unfortunately, as we have seen over the last seven decades, the US government IS the Enemy of the American People. (see Codevilla’s article linked above) So the woman’s ‘Fear’ of the intentions of the US Government has a solid foundation. She can not trust that the government has HER best interests and NOT the best interests of the vaccine manufactures at heart when decisions are made.

Second US Scientists and drug companies are NOT to be trusted and neither is the FDA. I have a whole file folder on Fake Research and Data falsification. Here is a tiny sample germane to a discussion on vaccines:
US Scientists Significantly More Likely to Publish Fake Research, Study Finds

PLoS ONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Reseach? A Systematic Review <<<VERY GOOD!

PLoS Medicine: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

Science Mag: Peer Review is Sick and Collapsing Under it’s Own Weight

Scientific Fraud and the Power Structure of Science

Research Misconduct Identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: Out of Sight, Out of Mind, Out of the Peer-Reviewed Literature

….Results
Fifty-seven published clinical trials were identified for which an FDA inspection of a trial site had found significant evidence of 1 or more of the following problems: falsification or submission of false information, 22 trials (39%); problems with adverse events reporting, 14 trials (25%); protocol violations, 42 trials (74%); inadequate or inaccurate recordkeeping, 35 trials (61%); failure to protect the safety of patients and/or issues with oversight or informed consent, 30 trials (53%); and violations not otherwise categorized, 20 trials (35%). Only 3 of the 78 publications (4%) that resulted from trials in which the FDA found significant violations mentioned the objectionable conditions or practices found during the inspection. No corrections, retractions, expressions of concern, or other comments acknowledging the key issues identified by the inspection were subsequently published.
Conclusions and Relevance
When the FDA finds significant departures from good clinical practice, those findings are seldom reflected in the peer-reviewed literature, even when there is evidence of data fabrication or other forms of research misconduct….

The FDA did manage to catch one… FDA says CRO Cetero faked trial data; pharmas may need to redo tests

NEWS ARTICLES
NYT: Rise in Scientific Journal Retractions Prompts Calls For Reform

Daily Mail UK: The ‘false’ pandemic: Drug firms cashed in on scare over swine flu, claims Euro health chief

Word Press CENSORED this site, Live Avian Flu Virus Placed in Baxter Vaccine Materials Sent to 18 Countries

The company that released contaminated flu virus material from a plant in Austria confirmed Friday that the experimental product contained live H5N1 avian flu viruses….
On Friday, the company’s director of global bioscience communications confirmed what scientists have suspected. “It was live,” Christopher Bona said in an email.
The contaminated product, which Baxter calls “experimental virus material,” was made at the Orth-Donau research facility. Baxter makes its flu vaccine — including a human H5N1 vaccine for which a licence is expected shortly — at a facility in the Czech Republic.
People familiar with biosecurity rules are dismayed by evidence that human H3N2 and avian H5N1 viruses somehow co-mingled in the Orth-Donau facility. That is a dangerous practice that should not be allowed to happen, a number of experts insisted. Accidental release of a mixture of live H5N1 and H3N2 viruses could have resulted in dire consequences….

Alternate from Physicians for Life: (Not a Word press blog) Live Avian Flu Virus Placed in Baxter Vaccine Materials Sent to 18 Countries (2009)

I remember when this information hit the news and I was appalled. I have worked as a QC Engineer in Drug manufacture. There is NO WAY IN HADES this should have happened. WHY? Because you LABEL EVERYTHING and it is double signed off when raw materials are withdrawn from the warehouse by manufacturing to PREVENT this type of mistake.

Vaccine Industry Watchdog Obtains CDC Documents That Show Statistically Significant Risks of Autism Associated with Vaccine Preservative Thimerosal

“Biochemist Brian Hooker, scientific advisor to A Shot of Truth, reveals CDC knew of risks for over a decade.”

February 19, 2014
For nearly ten years, Brian Hooker has been requesting documents that are kept under tight wraps by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). His more than 100 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests have resulted in copious evidence that the vaccine preservative Thimerosal, which is still used in the flu shot that is administered to pregnant women and infants, can cause autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.
Dr. Hooker, a PhD scientist, worked with two members of Congress to craft the letter to the CDC that recently resulted in his obtaining long-awaited data from the CDC, the significance of which is historic. According to Hooker, the data on over 400,000 infants born between 1991 and 1997, which was analyzed by CDC epidemiologist Thomas Verstraeten, MD, “proves unequivocally that in 2000, CDC officials were informed internally of the very high risk of autism, non-organic sleep disorder and speech disorder associated with Thimerosal exposure.”….

http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/cdc-whistleblower-is-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/“>CDC whistleblower is just the tip of the iceberg

…“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” —(Marcia Angell, MD, “Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption.” NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)
Here is another quote of a similar nature, also published in the NY Review of Books (May 12, 2001, Helen Epstein, “Flu Warning: Beware of Drug Companies”):
“Six years ago, John Ioannidis, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Ioannina School of Medicine in Greece, found that nearly half of published articles in scientific journals contained findings that were false.”…

So I hope these articles establish the fact this woman had a solid foundation for her concerns and the doctor’s default to ‘BLAME IT ON RUSSIA’ would be funny if it was not so serious.

Do you really think these Mega-corporations, who PAY the doctors, ACTUALLY CARE if a certain percentage of children are crippled or die from their vaccines? Don’t you think the Elite would LIKE to see American girls made sterile and more people on the government dole to aid the Cloward–Piven strategy?

What the Mega-corporations care about is MONEY and they have that all fixed up.

1987 ‘Limited’ Liability LAW:
42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22 – Standards of responsibility

….No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party (or the injured party’s legal representative) of the potential dangers resulting from the administration of the vaccine manufactured by the manufacturer….

“Vaccine makers and federal officials will be immune from lawsuits that result from any new swine flu vaccine, under a document signed by Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, government health officials said Friday.”
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hjdCHrP82YTFser5vD6CzTK1az6wD99GH8580

The first doses of swine flu vaccine will be given to the public before full data on its safety and effectiveness become available, doctors confirmed yesterday…..But, unlike seasonal flu vaccine, the pandemic version will be spread over two doses in a higher quantity, and one brand is expected to contain a chemical additive to make it go further, potentially increasing the risk of side-effects.http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/safety-questions-over-swine-flu-jab-1751547.html

“On February 22, 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court shielded drug companies from all liability for harm caused by vaccines mandated by governmentwhen companies could have made a safer vaccine…. From now on, drug companies selling vaccines in America will not be held accountable…
The only difference is that three decades ago, government officials were ordering doctors to give children 23 doses of 7 vaccines and, today, that direct order is up to 70 doses of 16 vaccines.” NVIC link

Since this law has been upheld in the Supreme Court, WE the consumers now get to PAY for those crippled or killed:
Vaccine injury compensation programs:
https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/vaccine-injury-compensation-programs

Other sites discussing vaccines:
http://www.financialsensearchive.com/editorials/engdahl/2010/0304.html

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/horowitz4.html

OK Time to leave the politics of vaccines and actually take a look at vaccination.

Here is the US Vaccination schedule for children.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html#vaccines-schedule

[Wolfie can you include a screen shot of the chart for Birth to 15 Months please?]

Here you go!
Wolf

First I am NOT a doctor and I do not have human kids. Mine are goats kids and lambs. However we are all mammals so at least some information applies across species.

Starting with newborns:
Colostrum definition: A sticky white or yellow fluid secreted by the mammary glands after giving birth, rich in antibodies. The antibodies absorbed by the newborn protect against systemic invasion by pathogens while antibodies that are not absorbed play an important role in protection against intestinal disease.

The small intestine is lined with immature cells which are capable of absorbing macromolecules.
Immunoglobulins ( antibodies) can not transmission across the placenta of the mother to the fetus. Instead the Immunoglobulins in the Colostrum is absorbed in the small intestine and thereafter transported to the blood. “The absorption of immunoglobulins has dropped to a relatively low level after 24-36 hours.” — The importance of colostral immunoglobulins and their absorption from the intestine of the newborn animalsfrom the National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine

Vaccination: Kid goats that had passive immunity from immunized dams, don’t get their CD/T vaccination until 8 weeks and again at 11-12 weeks. My vet doesn’t recommend doing it earlier. HOWEVER If the kid didn’t receive its mom’s colostrum or if the doe didn’t get vaccination a month or so before birth, you should vaccinate the kid at the age of 1 to 3 weeks and again three to four weeks later. (And PRAY)

Sheep 201: Flock vaccinations written by Susan Schoenian, Sheep & Goat Specialist at the University of Maryland’s Western Maryland Research & Education Center in Keedysville, Maryland.

…
Passive immunity
Vaccines are not very successful in young lambs, 1-2 months of age. For this reason, vaccination strategies recommend vaccinating pregant ewe to confer passive immunity to the lambs through the colostrum (dam’s first milk). Ewes should be vaccinated with the CDT toxoid approximately 4 weeks prior to lambing. Ewes lambing for the first time will need to be vaccinated twice in late pregnancy, four weeks apart. Maternal antibodies will protect lambs for six to eight weeks so long as lambs consumed adequate amounts of colostrum. It is recommended that a lamb consume 10 percent of its body weight in colostrum.
Lambs
Lambs should receive their first clostridal vaccination when they are approximately 6 to 8 weeks of age, followed by a booster 4 weeks later. If pastured animals are later brought into confinement or dry lot for concentrate feeding, a third vaccination should be given. Some experts recommended giving artifically-reared lambs multiple vaccinations.
Lambs whose dams were not vaccinated for C and D can be vaccinated with some success at two to three days of age and again in two weeks. However, later vaccinations will likely be more effective, as colostral antibodies usually interfere with vaccinations at very young ages. The lamb’s immature immune system may also not be able to respond to vaccination at such a young age.

Lambs and goats are usually weaned at 2 to 3 months, horses at 4 to 6 months. Lambs and goats live to mid teens, horses into there 20s and 30s. Human babies are weaned naturally sometime between 2 and 4 years of age. Humans live into their 70s and 80s. Animals are usually vaccinated AFTER they are weaned!

Last recommendation: ” Each producer must weights the pros and cons of vaccinating for a specific disease. If the cost of vaccination exceeds the expected losses, then vaccination is probably not cost-effective….The risk of a diseases outbreak should be the criteria that is used to determine the need for vaccination.” — Susan Schoenian, Sheep & Goat Specialist
Translation: Check with your vet/ vet school on what diseases are around your area and ALWAYS limit the exposure of your animals. If you show have separate quarantine areas for show animals also for animals you are newly introducing to the farm.
…

What is the take home from all of this?
1. QUARRANTINE IMMIGRANTS don’t bring the disease into the country in the first place. Since our traitorous government refuses to do this, do as much as you can to limit your exposure and your children’s exposure especially for the very young. (I hate seeing infants at a daycare as I did yesterday.)

2. MOM should receive the vaccinations not the New Born.

3. MOM should breast feed during the first few days to pass immunity to her baby even if she does not plan to continue breastfeeding. Try to stay home with your infant or use a private individual (like grand parent) for your very young baby instead of a commercial daycare. This limits disease exposure and thus need for very early vaccination.

4. Infant vaccination is a poor second for nature’s Colostrum and very early vaccination is needed only if Mom has not past immunity on to the infant via Colostrum AND can not manage quarantine conditions. (Why my bottle lambs were in the kitchen and are even now in a quarantined area instead of with the sheep.)

I have also been warned by my vet that the vaccines for multiple diseases are not a smart idea. Spacing the vaccinations of individual diseases works MUCH better.

Seems President Trump agrees!

H/T to thinkthinkthink who on April 30, 2019 at 20:55 Said:

PDJT had strong opinions on timing of vax shots for his children, just as these parents did.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D5RkmLsXoAE4kle.jpg

There you have it. Please feel free to comment in any way you see fit. WE – unlike everybody else in socialist media – have free speech. Moreover, it is not MY JOB to determine what is “misinformation”. That is YOUR JOB.

**FREE AS IN THE FREE FALL OF THE SOCIALIST MEDIA AND FAKE NEWS INTO A TRAP OF THEIR OWN CONSTRUCTION**

Strategery: Softening Up GCHQ With Edward Snowden

As part of a new, long-term theme like the “VLWC” (Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy) series, I’m going to help people see long-term commie moves with a “Strategery” series. I love stealing this word, because the people in the Bush camp who adopted it as their version of “Deplorables” clearly had little understanding of the long-term strategy of the communists who manipulated them so readily.

Our “strategery” will put theirs to shame. And to think THEY opposed Trump. Ridiculous.

AND logic.
LONG-TERM thinking.
UNCERTAINTY as a way of life.

These things will slowly bring us into levels of understanding that makes the either/or, short-term-thinking, implication-as-fake-certainty FAKE NEWS absolutely useless. I repeat these ideas differently.

Life is not either/or, and getting you to think that way is a TRICK.
Life is not short-term. Getting you to see and respond to the short-term, by long-term thinkers, is a TRICK.
Life is uncertain. Getting you to NEED certainty when there is no certainty, is a TRICK.

We begin today’s lesson with a Q drop from yesterday.

3327
New: Title TBD
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI27 Apr 2019 – 2:25:06 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jan/23/gchq-chief-robert-hannigan-quits 📁
Soon To Be A HouseHold Name.
Q
Q Post 3327

Much of the Q movement is going to concentrate on what I regard as the chump change of this drop – the odd capitalization of every word, and the splitting of “household” into HouseHold. Trust me – our buddy Q has some awesome messages in there for the SB2 types. However, that is THEIR bag, not ours.

Happy hunting, cryptogram solvers.

WE, in contrast, are going to get all Bezmenov on this one.

Several parts of the article are highly relevant:

The subtitle:

Hannigan oversaw a more open approach at GCHQ after the Snowden revelations exposed mass surveillance by the agency

From the article – the CORE of the issue:

Hannigan only took over at the UK’s surveillance agency in November 2014 to oversee a more open approach after revelations by the National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden put GCHQ on the defensive in 2013.
His sudden resignation – he informed staff just hours before making this decision public – prompted speculation that it might be related to British concerns over shared intelligence with the US in the wake of Donald Trump becoming president.

The key point here is that SNOWDEN had effects on GCHQ. ONE of those effects that led to MANY OTHERS was insertion of THIS GUY HANNIGAN.

Now – if you’re following along with Q, then you know Snowden was a CLOWN OP that had a strong intention to damage NSA. But THAT is not necessarily the only reason. And to think about WHY Snowden was manipulated into doing what he did, remember that commies will try to SOW ONCE and REAP MANY TIMES. See how the suppression of AND logic keeps us dumb? THEY think multiple outcomes. WE chase our tails on the idea of WHICH outcome.

We need to GET OVER the idea that SNOWDEN did what he did for ONE REASON.

We also need to GET OVER the idea that SNOWDEN was a short-term yield. AND we need to get over the idea that we know ALL of the reasons they did the Snowden operation.

Are you with me? Let’s move on.

Remember – this guy CAME IN and LEFT on controversy. Controversy is USEFUL to them.

The “leaver” tweet:

We're sorry to announce that Robert Hannigan, our Director since 2014, has decided to step down as head of GCHQhttps://t.co/K5KdKnStcz pic.twitter.com/HaQpWYlqP2
— GCHQ (@GCHQ) January 23, 2017

Note that both the INSERTION and REMOVAL of this guy are a PATTERN of POKE and RESPONSE due to REVELATION and MEDIA MANIPULATION. The other side uses this all the time. This is an extremely important reason why FAKE NEWS works. Fake News helps to control both the REVELATION and the MANIPULATION.

SIDEBAR:

Khashoggi was a perfect example. CIA commies and their DNC media CREATED and then “revealed” a fake American, a fake journalist, and in many ways a fake victim, who had been manipulated into his own MURDER – one that they controlled in several hidden ways – and could then use primary blame-casting of the set-up Saudis to manipulate American foreign policy.

The problem with Khashoggi was that the PUBLIC and REAL JOURNALISM were able to reveal enough hidden truth that the whole operation’s SKETCHY NATURE became evident. It was clearly a MANIPULATION – and United States foreign policy does NOT deserve to change because of communist manipulations – even if they are OUR COMMUNISTS.

Back to Hannigan – particularly his INSERTION.

First of all, who is he?

Hannigan’s background was not initially in intelligence. Born in Gloucester in 1965 and brought up in Yorkshire, he had been a high-flying civil servant at the Northern Ireland Office, where he was head of communications and later political director. He was involved in the peace process, credited [note media manipulation – W] with coming up with the idea for a diamond-shaped table [rolling eyes hard -W] in order to get over objections by the opposing sides about seating arrangements.
He transferred to London where he became involved in a series of intelligence jobs, including defence and liaison with the US, before going on to GCHQ, where he worked for six months as part of the handover before taking control.
Guardian article

If this looks a lot like a typical unqualified or deceptively qualified OBAMA APPOINTEE, then yeah, you’re seeing it, too. This guy had no business being in charge of GCHQ. And yet he was. FUNNY, THAT.

FAKE REFORM is a very big thing with communists and OUR intelligence agencies.

So – let’s look at their FAKE REFORM at GCHQ. What did the commies REALLY DO?

At the time, GCHQ, in spite of many of its secrets spilled by Snowden, remained the most secretive of the three intelligence agencies: the others being MI6 and MI5. But Hannigan expanded the press team, invited more journalists to visit GCHQ and encouraged a stream of news stories aimed at bringing the agency into the public eye. [as if any of this is going to actually solve any problems. -W]
In his first week in office, he created controversy with a column published in the Financial Times accusing US technology companies of becoming “the command and control networks of choice” for terrorists.
In March last year, he softened his criticism in a speech to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, calling for a new relationship between the intelligence agencies and the tech companies, part of a campaign to try to secure the help of the companies in providing access to supposedly encrypted messages.
Guardian article

I could go on forever about this. Hannigan BEHAVED in the classic ways of a CLINTON or OBAMA appointee. Once you see that “saboteur” model in operation, you never forget it.

invites in reporters and other “low-grade spies” – this is extremely reminiscent of Hazel O’Leary in Energy. The left LOVES to get a diversity-based or other unqualified leftoid in at the top, who leverages a media-driven moral panic (“OH NOES! WE NEED OPEN!”) or moral manic (“OH, JOY, WE ARE ALL OPEN NOW!”) to WEAKEN security
immediately uses JOURNALISM to call for tech censorship using terrorism foil
immediately blame-casts to US tech companies on terror (which problem, ironically, NSA is watching), while US tech companies are simultaneously media-cast as VICTIMS of spying by the Snowden op, in order to WEAKEN the NSA. What are the commies trying to do here? What communists always try to do. Get a government function out of government, to some place they control. What the commies wanted to do was SHIFT the burden of fighting terror (which they control) from the NSA to SJWs in tech companies. (As if that would work!) Funny that those SJWs would censor the political enemies of the left. Such a coincidence.
note that Hannigan’s timeline MATCHES Obama’s post-Obamacare roll-out failure-excused calls for partnership with tech, that quickly turned into tech hiring of SJWs and massive censorship
BIG POINT – SNOWDEN softened up the tech companies to censorship pitch

So – are you beginning to see why they don’t want a serious inquiry of this Hannigan guy? GET HIM OUT while the getting is good. Just like the lady (NOT Lois Lerner) who was responsible for the IRS scandal. Just like Eric Holder getting out of Dodge.

Resignation or job-shifting before inquiry is STRAIGHT out of the Obama manual. They needed this Hannigan guy GONE pronto, as soon as Trump was elected.

And what, finally, was the BIGGEST point?

SNOWDEN LED TO INSERTION OF SOMEBODY AT GCHQ WHO WOULD PLAY BALL WITH OBAMA IN 2016, TO ELECT HILLARY CLINTON.

What are our big learning points here?

Snowden was a big op with MANY OUTCOMES (AND logic), had MANY BIG LATE EFFECTS (long-term thinking), and likely will have MANY MORE that we have not yet recognized (uncertainty).

Strategery. The commies may have it. But so do we.

AND Logic: The Conspiracy to Ban Guns

by Gail Combs

title and foreword by Wolf Moon

I have often harped on the idea that the left – and enemies of truth in general – have managed to sneak a considerable amount by us, by using a very generalized kind of disinformation. Rather than corrupting our DATA – our facts – they have actually managed to corrupt our THINKING – our processing of the data. This is a far more powerful and insidious way of dominating us.
Small facts can be hidden by small lies. Huge conspiracies can be hidden by small changes to our thinking.
One of the chief ways this has been done, is by subconsciously promoting the simplistic approach of “either-or” thinking – namely XOR (“exclusive OR”) logic. There is a HUGE difference between XOR and OR, because OR logic includes the case or cases where two or more options are simultaneously true – namely AND logic.
XOR thinking is promoted by many means which appear to have nothing at all to do with it. For example, by simply lowering the quality of discourse from calm inquiry to heated argument, XOR thinking is advanced, and more nuanced AND logic is thrown out the window. Thus, TROLLING is a very effective way to advance XOR logic as a means to HIDE TRUTH.
When I talk about the promotion of XOR logic, I’m frequently talking about non-interacting alternatives, where one idea is HIDDEN from investigation, by simply advancing shinier and easier-to-believe alternatives. This works nicely with Eckert’s Law (regarding the thwarting of Occam’s razor by deception), because DECEPTION allows us to construct unbelievable alternatives as realities, and then protect them from scrutiny by means such as simpler and more plausible chaff alternatives. MILITARY CAMOUFLAGE and INSECT MIMICRY both work on this principle. These are both the work of INTELLIGENCE – in one case neural individual intelligence, in the other case distributed evolutionary intelligence.
Now – here is an interesting thought which Gail Combs had – something which not only breaks down such forms of deception, but helps us to see the bigger picture.
What if AND logic doesn’t just bring a hidden alternative back into play for some cases, but actually explains the TOTALITY of facts BETTER than either explanation alone? What if there is EXPLANATORY SYNERGY? In essence, we are recovering a LARGER AND BETTER ruling by Occam’s razor from not just a more LIMITED ruling, but a more MISTAKEN one.
This is something we should add to our logic arsenal. TWO explanations , or a single larger one, may not simply explain MORE cases. Two explanations, or a single larger one, may actually explain all individual cases BETTER.
When we find such a condition, we need to ADVANCE THE BETTER, LARGER EXPLANATION. And we need to fight back against oversimplifying opposition, like the fake news media, which demands compactness and simplicity NOT when it suits the discovery of larger and greater truth, but rather when it suits their agenda of deception.
NOW – on to the specific case under discussion.
What Gail is presenting here is not merely a perfect example of “finding a better, larger, combined explanation”. This is much bigger.
This thinking actually offers the first really good explanation of what I would call the COMPLETE PICTURE of Eric Holder’s greatest wish:
“a way to brainwash people against guns”.
This post explains how numerous curious Democrat strategies are actually connected by a single larger purpose which explains them all. To be really, really blunt about it:
“a way to MK people against guns”.
What we have RIGHT HERE is one of the GRANDEST uses of MK in history – at all levels from targeted individual to mass global. We can now EXPLAIN many Democrat actions which seemed to lack any coherent purpose.
Oh, no. These actions had a purpose. And when we have elucidated the complete, monstrous, THEORY and EXPLANATION of the entire operation, Eric Holder needs to be confronted with every single facet in a court of law, so we can know the TRUTH.
Wolf Moon

PART ONE: Introduction

I am going to start with the information from Wolfmoon that triggered my new thoughts and expanded my thinking to “AND LOGIC.“ . The following quotes are from his Déjà Woo and The Unbelievable Convenience of Amnesia articles plus his comments within those articles.

As Wolfmoon says: “This is a perfect place to practice AND LOGIC.“ I have always thought of it as multidimensional thinking instead of linear thinking.

An example of AND LOGIC. is:

Smoking [PLUS] Asbestos = Lung Cancer.

It takes BOTH to get a high incidence of lung cancer but the activists, lawyers and MSM ignored the actual evidence and blamed only Asbestos.

Most people look for the simple logic of If = Then. They do not consider the more complicated If #1 [PLUS] #2 [PLUS] #3 = Then. or as Wolfmoon put it “AND LOGIC.”

The FIRST BIG CLUE from Wolfmoon:

“People will also start looking for MK where it is actually most common and most useful – where it MAKES MONEY and GRABS POWER for DEMOCRATS.”

…POWER…. Hmmm.

A great example of this is the Global Warming Scam. HUGE amounts of tax payer $$$ have been diverted into the pockets of select individuals. For example:

“Nancy Pelosi’s brother-in-law is given $737m of taxpayers’ money to build giant solar power plant in middle of the desert. Obama administration approved $1 billion in green energy loans days after failed Solyndra project due to be completed. Energy Department is ‘rushing’ $5bn in loans ahead of Friday deadline.” link

The SECOND BIG CLUE from Wolfmoon:

“….PTSD, anybody? Think about it. AUTOMATIC COVER. And not just that. Supposedly these [MK] techniques work better in the AFTERMATH of traumatic events….”

Would these techniques work even better on a person who has been given BRAIN ALTERING drugs since they entered grade school? Would the power hungry do that to millions of American children in their quest for more and more power?

The THIRD BIG CLUE from Wolfmoon:
This is the real KEY:

“….People cannot even comprehend this idea of making people do something highly non-sensical and possibly even self-destructive…. They have been programmed by Fake Entertainment to reject this stuff as entirely fictional, or sufficiently fictional that it is no more than a parlor trick.
Nobody will tell them about the mathematics of low wins on high purses – the idea that if 9 out of 10 low-level money-maker MK ops fail, but one wins, it EASILY pays for the failures. Americans have been conditioned to believe that only highly reliable techniques are ever deployed. People fail to understand that failure is an accepted part of statistical wins.
My prejudices about what is possible in mind control are why for YEARS I never picked up on a person who did something highly nonsensical that resulted in the goals of CA3 [Conspiracy to Advance Affirmative Action] being fulfilled….
…Spycraft, mission enhancement, obfuscation and disinformation are part of it. Accident creation, crime enabling, and violence are the rest….
Are you starting to see why “MK” and “crazy” go together? Think like a CRIMINAL to see how it’s used. Think like a HACKER who does not want to get caught. Understand WHY discreditation is used to PROTECT technology…”

Wolfmoon was looking at a Conspiracy to Advance Affirmative Action. I am looking at the big one, The Conspiracy to Advance a Complete Gun Ban.

PART TWO: Power grab

The FIRST BIG CLUE from Wolfmoon:
“GRABS POWER for DEMOCRATS.”

What is the BIGGEST stumbling block keeping the Communists, masquerading as Democrats, from grabing complete control of the USA and thus the world? Our Second Amendment rights to own weapons!

Our founding fathers knew exactly how important an armed citizenry was to the preservation of freedom.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/72/36/47/723647394503dc68c850adb03224017d.jpg

Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence.
George Washington

History teaches us gun control is the first step of the totalitarian dictator. Murder of defiant subjects is the second:

1911 Turkey Gun control — from 1915 to 1917 – 1.5 million Arminans killed
1935 China gun control — from 1948 to 1952 – 20 million killed
1938 Germany Gun control — from 1935 to 1945 – 20,946,000 murdered.
1956 Cambodia gun control — from 1975 to 1977 – 1 to 2 million educated people murdered.
1964 Guatamala Gun Control — from 1964 to 1981 – 100,000 Mayan Indians killed.
1970 Uganda gun control in — from 1971 to 1979 – 300,000 Christians killed, a total of 2 to 3 million murdered.

http://www.quotesvalley.com/images/61/political-power-grows-out-of-the-barrel-of-a-gun.png

PART THREE: Change the Conversation and hide the evidence.

Americans are NOT about to give up their guns. This is especially true of Conservatives, who understand our Second Amendment rights are about preserving our freedom and our Constitution. They understand gun rights are NOT about hunting or self defense. For years the Left has been trying to change the conversation and hide WHY gun ownership is a RIGHT and not a government granted privilege. It hasn’t worked well. Now they realize to grab our guns, they must paint Conservatives as ‘VIOLENT Right-Wing Extremists’ so the arguments by Conservatives will be discounted. The goal is not just to have the arguments of the Conservatives discounted, but to make people FEAR Conservatives so there will be no shock, only relief when these ‘VIOLENT Right-Wing Extremists’ are slated for ‘re-education’ or extermination.

First paint the opposition as the devil incarnate, then take them out. After all the technique work very well for the Nazis and the Soviets and other totalitarian regimes. Why argue with success?
…

It wasn’t until I was doing the research for this article that I realize the implications of what I had seen on Election day, 2018. A friend and I, wearing Trump/Pence 2020 T-shirts, were handing out flyers at our local polling place. I am close to 70 and under 5′ 4″ while my friend was a short male, perhaps 5’6″. We were talking with a couple of Democrat ladies who were over 50, when a woman in her twenties came towards us. She stopped short, stared at us, and made a wide circle around us. She was clearly SCARED TO DEATH of us!! http://www.sherv.net/scratching.head-emoticon-5921.html

This young lady was an example of just how well the propaganda about ‘VIOLENT Right-Wing Extremists’ was working.

Wolfmoon: “…Like I always say, 99.99(numbers)% of MK is done openly – mostly by the Mind Control Media, but also by individually tailored psy-ops through social media….” This young woman was a perfect example of a victim of the Mind Control Media’s psy-ops. She acted as if she truly believed we would actually get violent and hurt her!

Since the goal of the Left is to paint Conservatives as THE ENEMY and the only enemy, the last thing they want is a competing narrative out there. Therefore, ever since 9/11 the Left has been trying to shift the narrative from Islamic Terrorists to Homegrown Extremists’ aka VIOLENT Right-Wing Extremists.

Here are news stories that show the slow morphing of the focus and the narrative.

First step – shutdown Department of Homeland Security targeting of the REAL Terrorists:
After all you can not have the Sheeple realize you are importing Islamic Terrorists into the country by the bus load.

SYNOPSES of Breitbart Article:
Department of Homeland Security whistleblower Philip Haney, was a founding member of the Passenger Analysis Unit,(PAU). It was established as a stand-alone agency in 2003 after 9/11. He was moved to the National Targeting Center and tracked Tablighi Jamaat, a Salafist Muslim fundamentalist group. Haney discovered a large number of Tablighi Jamaat members were entering the United States on the visa waiver programs often on E.U. – UK passports. They were proceeding to locations known to be part of the extremist networks in the USA Haney had been piecing together. Haney and his fellow investigators found links from the Tablighi Jamaat network to Hamas, al-Qaeda,and global terrorist funding. But his initiative was deemed politically incorrect under the Obama Admin. and shut down by the Department of Homeland Security’s Civil Rights and Civil Liberties division. — link
Even Politico talks of The secret backstory of how Obama let Hezbollah off the hook “…the Obama administration derailed an ambitious law enforcement campaign targeting drug trafficking by the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hezbollah, even as it was funneling cocaine into the United States… Hezbollah turned to trafficking cocaine and laundering money through used cars to finance its expansion.”

Meanwhile the media continues to bury the evidence linking any shootings TO Jihad. Unless the person is a White Conservative and/or Christian, color, nationality and religion are left out of the news stories. In one case the Judge even blocked the prosecutors from using evidence to explain the motive of the Fort Hood shooter!

Next STEP – Start shifting the blame

Napolitano stands by controversial report

April 16, 2009
“Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday that she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist risks to the U.S…..”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/16/napolitano-stands-rightwing-extremism/?page=all

The actual report? Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment

Note the phrases: “Threats from white supremacist and violent antigovernment groups during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts.” because you will see them again in the January 18th, 2018 Politifact article where the term Far-right extremist groups “include white supremacists and anti-government militias, among others.”

It is worth at least skimming that report because it hits on many of our concerns, NAFTA, China, “Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans …
…the perceived loss of U.S. jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors, and home foreclosures. … extremists attribute these losses to a deliberate conspiracy conducted by a cabal of …“financial elites.”
…the perception that illegal immigrants were taking away American jobs through their willingness to work at significantly lower wages….” (After all those concerns are all in our heads and not real right?)

Napolitano: terror threat may be highest since 9/11

February 9, 2011
Washington (CNN) — The terrorist threat to the U.S. homeland has continued to “evolve” and may now “be at its most heightened state” since the September 11, 2001, terror attacks, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told members of Congress on Wednesday.
There is an increased reliance on recruiting Westerners into terrorist organizations, she told the House Homeland Security Committee. State and local law enforcement officers are increasingly needed to combat terror, and the focus must be on aiding law enforcement to help them secure communities, she said….
http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/02/09/terror.threat/index.html?hpt=T2

LAST STEP — Show Muslims are NOT terrorist risks, but that VIOLENT Right-Wing Extremists ARE!!!

November 7, 2018 one day after elections there was a shooting that made the headlines.

Given Wolfmoon is correct and the Deep State can orchestrate some of these shooting, I think the TIMING of this shooting was off. Perhaps the guy was strong enough to fight the ‘directive’ for a few weeks. I think it was supposed to occur a week or more BEFORE the elections and be another “George Zimmerman – Trayvon Martin” media circus to drive voters TO the Democrat candidates. However it is interesting to read what was written, to see the MK Psy-ops embedded in the story because it sticks out like a sore thumb.

The story is not just about an unfortunate shooting, it is all about BLAME CASTING. The story echoes the same type of blame casting seen in the Zimmerman – Martin media circus. In that previous case the media was banging the drum about a ‘White on Black’ crime;. Or as Wolfmoon put it the Conspiracy to Advance Affirmative Action, and stir up blacks to vote for Obama.

Note it also falls right in with Wolfmoon’s proposal: “….PTSD, anybody? Think about it. AUTOMATIC COVER. And not just that. Supposedly these [MK] techniques work better in the AFTERMATH of traumatic events….”

The Left Narrative Engineering from Fortune Magazine:

Last night, a gunman opened fire in the Borderline Bar and Grill last night in Thousand Oaks, Calif. At least twelve people are dead, including Ventura County Sheriff Sgt. Ron Helus, and up to fifteen more were injured.
The shooter was Ian David Long, and he was a Marine Corps veteran. He was found dead at the scene. He seemed deeply troubled…..[As Wolfmoon said, very useful to have a killer, with PTSD, who ends up dead as cover. Almost all of these shooters end up dead because dead men can’t talk.]
we’re in a period of time when this kind of mass violence fails to shock for very long…. And a meaningful political conversation about guns, one that reflects the true concerns of all constituents…
But we’re also in a period where hate speech and the violence it inspires has been on the rise. [ Yea Think?Breitbart Rap Sheet: ***639*** Acts of Media-Approved Violence and Harassment Against Trump Supporters ]
Here’s one data point. White supremacists and other far-right extremists have killed far more people in the US since Sept. 11, 2001, than any other type of extremist group. By far. According to the Anti-Defamation League, some 71 percent of the extremist-related fatalities in the United States between 2008 and 2017 were committed by members of the far right or white-supremacist movements, compared to just 26 percent committed by people associated with Muslim groups.
And yet, official counter-terrorism efforts focus only on potential “jihadists” and not on the white supremacists who are now organizing in similar ways.….
“We’re actually seeing all the same phenomena of what was happening with groups like ISIS, same tactics, but no one talks about it because it’s far-right extremism,” P. W. Singer, a national-security strategist with the New America think tank tells Janet Reitman in a deeply reported piece for The New York Times. Even before the Trump administration, he says, “we willingly turned the other way on white supremacy because there were real political costs to talking about white supremacy.”….. http://fortune.com/2018/11/08/raceahead-california-shooting/“

BOY, they sure are cranking up the volume!

Fartacus [Cory Booker] also jumps in and keep the new narrative in the limelight…

“In American history since 9/11, we’ve had 85 major attacks in our country, 73 percent of them have been by white nationalist hate groups.” — Cory Booker on Tuesday, January 16th, 2018 in an interview on CNN

Of course you have to have the ‘Controlled Opposition’ chime in to MUDDY THE WATERS to keep the Sheeple from thinking for themselves. The key is to tone it down some but still leave the impression ‘far-right extremist groups’ are numerous and dangerous.

Polifact on the Booker quote:

Among those incidents, far-right violent extremist groups were responsible for 62 incidents (73 percent) while radical Islamist violent extremists were responsible for 23 incidents (27 percent).
Booker used the term “white nationalists,” but that’s not exactly the same thing as far-right extremist groups….
The GAO report (see page 29) shows that a subset of far-right incidents — about 38 incidents — were committed specifically by white supremacists…. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jan/18/cory-booker/fact-checking-cory-bookers-statistic-attacks-white/

Cory Booker Uses Misleading Terror Data To Attack Trump — Daily Caller
WELLlll, they got it part right at least.

“…One of the particular points of contention for Booker was how the White House allegedly ignores America’s white supremacists, whom the senator argued were more dangerous than Islamic militants….
In Booker’s dramatic monologue, he claimed that all of these attackers held “bigoted, hateful ideas about minorities” and implied he wanted 73 percent of the DHS’s time spent tracking down these far-right extremists.
However, there are serious issues with the GAO report that Booker used to argue white supremacists are the biggest terror threat to the nation. One of the major problems with the study is what incidents it lumps in with right-wing terror.
The biggest error in GAO’s data on white supremacist terror was caught by National Review’s David French last April. The Umpqua Community College shooting, one of the deadliest shootings the GAO attributed to a white supremacist, was actually committed by an African-American with no discernible ideology outside of hatred for religion.
Anti-government activists who appeared not to have been motivated by hate for minorities committed a good portion of the violent incidents the study categorized as right wing terror — contrary to what Booker argued on Tuesday. The GAO study also includes prison slayings carried out by white supremacist gangs as cases of domestic terror.
Another problem French found with the study was its glaring omission of left-wing terrorism….. https://dailycaller.com/2018/01/17/cory-booker-trump-gao-report/

Of course BOTH articles blow it, leaving the basic impression behind that there ARE far-right violent extremist groups who are more of a problem than muslim jihadists just as the Deep State planned.

So what is the truth? After all we need the truth to counter the Media’s Psy-ops.

PART FOUR: Lie with Statistics

The Left LOVES to lie using false statistics or fudged numbers. With luck I do not mess up my math. So here goes.

The problem with the narrative that far-right extremists are more dangerous than radical Islamist extremists is it does not take into account population or to be more precise incidence per 1,000,000 people.

Scrounging around the internet I found these numbers:

The US Population is ~ 327 million.
The White, non-Hispanic or Latino population make up 61.3% of the nation’s total, with the total White population (including White Hispanics and Latinos) being 76.9%. — WIKI

65 percent whites leaned right in 2016 per a Washington Compost article by Joshua N. Zingher, an assistant professor of political science at Old Dominion University.

Calculating the white, non-Hispanic, population:
61.3% of 327 million is 200 million

And if you want to get picky, and count only the right-leaners:
65% of 200 million is 130 million

A Pew estimate of Muslims in 2017 is that they are about 1.1% of the total U.S. population. A Pew Forum report on American religion found that Muslims accounted for 0.9% of American adults in 2014, up from 0.4% in 2007, due largely to immigration. (Wikipedia) Note that during the BHO administration the population of Muslims more than doubled.

1.1% of 327 million is 3.6 million
…..

So what are the number of incidents per million people?

There were 62 incidents, assuming that those are by white right-wing people, and NOT ANTIFA or Anarchists, whom we may call white Commies.

Total White Population
62 divided by 200 million = 0.31 incidence per million

(or the picky number)
62 divided by 130 million = or 0.48 incidence per million

23 incidents by radical Islamist extremists
23 divided by 3.6 million = 6.4 incidence per million. That’s 20 TIMES THE RATE.

So Fartacus is Farting PURE Pig feces yet again!

But that leaves the real question. HOW do you GET ‘VIOLENT Right-Wing Extremists’ in the first place, when Conservatives are generally more peaceful and law abiding than the Left???

PART FIVE: Producing VIOLENT Right-Wing Extremists.

This is where WolfMoon’s insight and experience comes into play and the light bulb went off in my head.

“Nobody will tell them about the mathematics of low wins on high purses – the idea that if 9 out of 10 low-level money-maker MK ops fail, but one wins, it EASILY pays for the failures. Americans have been conditioned to believe that only highly reliable techniques are ever deployed. People fail to understand that failure is an accepted part of statistical wins.”

With the media providing cover and a corrupt government fudging the statistics, all you need is to INCREASE VIOLENCE among white males and then place the selected stories all over the news.

But HOW do you increase violence? DRUGS! Not only street drugs but carefully selected drugs administered TO the target —>WHITE MEN<—… or the little boys who will grow up to be white men.

They KNEW the drugs they are forcing on school children would turn them violent. THEY KNEW DECADES AGO!

..in 1973, psychiatrists were giving amphetamines to volunteers in order to observe their reactions. The reactions frightened researchers, who noted that several of the subjects expressed “a desire to kill” or to do something “bad or destructive.”….” (This and the following quotes are sourced in my “Thursday comment” mentioned below.)

So they came up with a ‘new disease’

“…it was not until the late 1960s that the American Psychiatric Association (APA) formally recognized ADHD as a mental disorder….”

Prior to that, in 1957 Laufer et al….“found that “children with the hyperkinetic impulse disorder… had a lower threshold for clinical responses in EEG to the administration of metrazol than children without the hyperkinetic syndrome. Following the administration of amphetamines, however, the threshold was similar to that of children without evidence of the syndrome…”

If you want the history: *https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000907/

So now you have a reason to administer amphetamines to school children without an evidence of even ‘minimal brain damage’

PART SIX: Next step is to make sure the Kids HAVE THE SYMPTOMS!

Well that is easy:

1. NO discipline is pushed: The Hand that Rocked the Cradle: A Critical Analysis of Rockefeller Philanthropic Funding, 1920-1960

2. Mom is pushed out of the house via Feminism: How The Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women

3. Change the diet to a high carb, high sugar diet and put candy and soda machines in the schools.

4. REMOVE EXERCISE

You should see my lambs when I let them out of the dog crate in the morning. They buck and kick and run and jump… And yet we expect to CAGE little children, ESPECIALLY BOYS all day long in daycare or school without them rebelling?

And when they do we call it a ‘mental problem?
And people swallow this?
Are you effing kidding me??
…

There are 73.7 million children in the USA. And According to the CDC “More than 5 in 10 children (53.5%) aged 3-17 years with behavior disorders received treatment.” AGE THREE???
*https://www.cdc.gov/childrensmentalhealth/data.html

This is a short summary of my Thursday Comment It included the links for the following quotes.

“In 1996, 10 percent to 12 percent of all American schoolboys were taking the addictive Ritalin.”

“A study released this month by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia found that the number of teenagers who admit to abusing prescription medications tripled from 1992 to 2003, while in the general population such abuse had doubled”

“…Among elementary students, 17% of all students and 33% of white boys had been diagnosed with ADHD and the vast majority had been medicated for this condition at some time during the 1997-98 school year…. Ninety percent of all identified cases had been medicated for the disorder at some point …”

Think that is bad? It gets WORSE!

“… These findings suggest that as of 1998, school-based studies of ADHD prevalence captured approximately half of the cases treated in the community. Preliminary data from a follow-up study suggest that as of 2002, school records capture as few as 25% of ADHD cases (LeFever, 2002)….”

RITALIN AND VIOLENCE

… there are now over 5 million school kids in America on psychotropic drugs, most of which are prescribed and administered by the schools themselves. ….December 1996, there are four million kids on Ritalin alone, one of the most powerful of the drugs now being given routinely to children in American schools.

What is most disturbing, however, is the growing awareness that the increased violence among school children may have more to do with the drugs than with the guns they use to carry out their violence. ”’

NO Sh…T You think??

So there you have Wolfmoon’s “low-level money-maker MK ops” They only need 0.0001% of the White boys they mess up to go violent. The added benefit is it is the mostly highly intelligent ALPHA males who are likely to rebel and have their brains permanently messed up. A real Win-Win.

So you have the stage set.

There are 73.7 million children in the USA, 14.7 million are boys and about 1/2 are white or ~7 million. If 10% to 33% are drugged, that is at least 7,00,000 to 2,310,000 possible ticking time bombs. Even if only 1 in 10,000 go violent you have 70 or more artificially created incidents.

Remember Booker is citing a GAO Report about incidences from from Sept. 12, 2001 — the day after the 9/11 terror attacks — through Dec. 31, 2016, or fifteen years. “In 1996, 10 percent to 12 percent of all American schoolboys were taking the addictive Ritalin.” So plenty of time for those boys to grow up and kill people…

…. there are now over 5 million school kids in America on psychotropic drugs, most of which are prescribed and administered by the schools themselves. ….December 1996, there are four million kids on Ritalin alone, one of the most powerful of the drugs now being given routinely to children in American schools.
What is most disturbing, however, is the growing awareness that the increased violence among school children may have more to do with the drugs than with the guns they use to carry out their violence.
…Eric Harris, 18, who, with his friend Dylan Klebold, murdered his fellow students at Columbine, had been taking Luvox, one of the new antidepressant drugs approved in 1997 by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder, or OCD, among children under 18.
…. T. J. Solomon, 15, who shot and wounded six classmates at Heritage High School in Conyers, Ga., on May 20 was on Ritalin for depression.
Shawn Cooper, 15, who fired two shotgun rounds, narrowly missing students and teachers at his high school in Notus, Idaho, was also on Ritalin, for bipolar disorder.
Kip Kinkel, 15, was on Ritalin and Prozac. He murdered his parents and then went on to school where he fired on students in the cafeteria,…
Mitchell Johnson, the 13-year-old student at Westside Middle School in Jonesboro, Ark., who mowed down several children and a teacher with his friend Andrew Golden, 11, was on some sort of medication since he was being treated by a psychiatrist…..
http://www.ritalindeath.com/education/school-violence.htm

Then all you need to do is use the media to drive home the narrative ‘WHITE-SUPREMACISTS are TERRORISTS!

/FIN