Tag: remdesivir

The Vaccine-Powered Rona-Coaster

Is the Directed Evolution of Variants – Something Deeply Understandable to Joe Biden’s Science Advisors – Being Abused by the Corporate-Government-Academic Axis?

Yeah, you remember that one!

Several hat tips to Sundance on this one, too.

It’s now becoming very clear that the mercenary Bill Gates getting involved with healthcare was one of the LAST things that one could reasonably expect to help it.

We were such chumps.

GRIFTERS GONNA GRIFT.

They don’t “change”. They don’t “turn over a new leaf”. They GRIFT MORE and they GRIFT BIGGER.

Two international vaccine experts can help us to see how we got into the SUSTAINABLE GRIFT of needless vaccines to endlessly mutating viruses, which Bill Gates helped engineer.

Notice that I didn’t say sustainability grift – that’s a different grift, that uses MIRAGES of process sustainability to sell the opposite.

An excellent example of the sustainability grift is wind power, which – when you count all the resource consumption and natural destruction needed to “move lots of matter around with low energy output”, wastes more energy and resources overall, than it produces – and in the long run is NOT actually “sustainable”.

Wind power uses a mirage of overall sustainability which results from hypnosis by the microscopic sustainability of just ONE STAGE in the process, to sell a totality which is not truly sustainable or even efficient. Solar power is very similar. It has its uses, but the mirage they sell is far outside of the truth.

This type of grifting uses a misleading focus on part of the truth to sell a larger untruth, which is how many science grifts work.

Perpetual motion machines are an exemplary grift, and Anthony Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis” is an exemplary misdirection.

No – a sustainable grift (which can include the sustainability grift, cutely) is a grift that maintains itself in perpetuity, provided nobody looks closely. One of the best ways to create such a grift, is to pose a general source of a problem as a solution to it, so that the central problem will NEVER be solved.

This is a form of misleading by REVERSING reality. It’s a CYCLIC grift, that creates a false solution which is really a problem source.

Black Lives Matter(TM) is precisely that kind of sustainable grift.

To solve policing problems, BLM/Soros creates more problems and mischaracterizes them so that they can’t be solved.

BLM(TM), working with Soros DAs and AGs, creates thousands of new criminals of all kinds, at the same time hindering police, in the name of mercy for criminals who are intentionally misportrayed as innocent.

If you can pull it off, this kind of misleading can create monumental, whole-of-society grifts, that in some cases can NEVER be undone.

Climate change / global warming / global freezing are all beautiful GRIFTS of that nature, joined by the principle that “together, we can all do something impossible” – even better if it’s something needless. If the workers of the scam movement get busted, they just change the story – like all criminals do.

“Government will protect you from what it cannot affect.”

Fall for that kind of scam, and you are a SLAVE FOR LIFE.

So where does this go with vaccines?

Bill Gates Takes Over Global Vaccination

Astrid Stuckelberger figured out what was happening to global public health when Bill Gates took control of it, but she figured it out too late.

I highly recommend reading this article:

https://uncanceled.news/former-who-employee-dr-astrid-stuckelberger-a-pandemic-of-lies/

Let’s just save that image for when Bill Gates’ friends finally take down that article.

Here is the relevant section:

Stuckelberger also underscored that the “WHO is not the same organization as before”. There was a change in 2016, she explained.

“It was special: Organizations such as GAVI – the Global Alliance for Vaccine Immunization led by Bill Gates – they came to WHO in 2006 with funding. Since then, the WHO has developed into a new type of international organization. GAVI gained more and more influence, and total immunity, more than the diplomats in the UN. GAVI can do exactly what they want, the police can do nothing.”

The WHO underwent an audit in 2014 and after that, it became more like a company with countries as its subsidiaries.

“When I worked with international relations in the WHO in 2013, I saw that GAVI came in more and more. GAVI presented a global action plan for vaccination 2012-2020. That is, eight years where GAVI had everything in their hands. Bill Gates handled the vaccination, he took over.”

The WHO wields enormous power over countries, she said. “Before, all countries were free. But now, when I do interviews around the world, I see that each country is part of a ‘WHO company’. WHO is no longer a democratic member organization, like the UN. The various governments form the basis of the ‘enterprise’. It logically agrees with what is happening now, since the ‘companies’ want money, business, and to control people. It’s like slavery. The taxes we pay, they go to governments that are subject to ‘the company’. Under the multinational organizations, such as GAVI.”

“GAVI, the World Bank and the WHO entered into a contract called IFFM: International Facility Finance for Immunization. Our countries, our people, pay to the WHO, the World Bank and GAVI to carry out their immunization programs. Which means vaccinating the entire population. When you see the plan from GAVI, you see that from 2012 to 2020 they have had this as a goal. But then it did not work, they had to create a pandemic.”

She said the pandemic was most certainly planned. ” You can see this from all the documents. Everyone can analyze them, they are in the open, right in front of our eyes.”

I urge you to read more – if not now, then later.

LINK: https://uncanceled.news/former-who-employee-dr-astrid-stuckelberger-a-pandemic-of-lies/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/HS15K

GAVI is only ONE of Bill Gates’ “hidden hand” organizations, by which he gets TWO TOP VOTES on any council or advisory board. GAVI allows Bill Gates to control a putative solution – vaccines.

There is another organization called CEPI – Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations – by which Bill Gates controls the PROBLEM for which VACCINES are allegedly the answer.

Note that Bill Gates is controlling both the problem and the solution – and if the solution CAUSES THE PROBLEM, then he has just achieved what he needs as the basis for a cyclic, sustainable grift.

Do you see how CEPI – about epidemics – is only pointing toward one solution – vaccines?

Subtle, but learn to be a grift-catcher, and it just jumps out at you.

Let’s take a closer look at CEPI.

Quite obviously, CEPI was all over Event 201 – although the SPONSORS were slightly different.

See how that works? SELF-DEALING. Gates is an absolute expert at it. He controls VACCINES, and he controls EPIDEMICS. The PROBLEM, and the “SOLUTION” – which, if one tells the big lie just right – can CAUSE THE PROBLEM TO LAST FOREVER.

It’s CYCLIC, and it’s SUSTAINABLE, and it’s the same GRIFT PRINCIPLE as the wrap-up smear, where one hand claims that the other hand is the “news source”.

See how the control arises? Read that bit about CEPI. “Collaboration with regulators”? What do you THINK is going to happen? Same thing. Eventually, it’s all one side, and there are no checks and balances.

Gates is such a sharp operator. SO much sharper than the chumps he fools.

But there is HOPE in THE TRUTH – and Gates’ organization DID produce a TRUTH-TELLER.

Why BAD VACCINES are Worse Than NO VACCINES and Why We Need to STOP MASS-VACCINATION

When I heard a vaccine expert – a veteran of GAVI – namely Geert Vanden Bossche – saying that vaccinating into the pandemic was a BAD IDEA, well THAT is when my ears perked up, WOLF-QUICK.

Take note of the fact that this guy IS NOT and never was the HEAD of GAVI. He was NEVER one of their top clowns. He just worked for them. The head of GAVI can NEVER say anything like this – something that doesn’t back up Bill Gates 100%.

But this guy Vanden Bossche, who worked in vaccines his whole life, including for Bill Gates’ own organization GAVI, has expert knowledge that Bill Gates is pushing the wrong solution in our current situation.

Well, THAT is interesting.

Now – listen to Vanden Bossche talk about VARIANTS and vaccinating CHILDREN, when Gates and “other organizations” (COUGH, COUGH) started pushing THAT.

Remember – this video is JUNE 1, 2021. Everything Geert said has come true with Delta, and it coming true AGAIN with Omicron, as he predicted. This guy understood directed evolution of variants from the very beginning, and how those variants are why we have to STOP VACCINATING.

There are other people – on Biden’s scientific advisory board – who also understand directed evolution of variants. The question is, what are they doing with that knowledge? Are they causing the problem? Or are they even looking at the solution? We’ll get to that later.

Also – just a warning – Geert speaks ANNOYINGLY SLOWLY – but also EXTREMELY CLEARLY.

This is a 10-minute video that takes 35 minutes to get out, but there is NO MISTAKING what he says.

So – was Geert right?

LINK: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/14/scientists-identify-young-vaccinated-people-as-source-for-omicron-variant/

Let’s bust out that tweet.

It’s behind a paywall, but this much shows through:

“Data from Denmark shows that just over 70 per cent of omicron cases have been among those younger than 40.”

If you now go back and listen to Geert, starting at around 28 minutes, and from there to the end of the video, you will see that he predicted exactly what is happening – that the disease under pressure of the bad vaccines would mutate and move into the [generally] unvaccinated younger people – AND – and this is important – that VACCINATING THEM WITH THE CURRENT SUB-OPTIMAL VACCINES IS THE EXACT WRONG THING TO DO.

Why?

BECAUSE IT WILL MAKE THINGS EVEN WORSE.

Oh.

And he explains HOW it will be worse. It could be as bad as a Marek’s disease scenario.

This is what people are NOT GETTING – that the current vaccines are NOT GOOD ENOUGH, and that they are CAUSING MORE PROBLEMS THAN THEY SOLVE.

That’s GREAT if you have a GRIFT that depends on the bad vaccines. It’s NOT SO GREAT if you’re somebody who actually cares about SOLVING problems (plural).

You know – like not making a new problem worse than the old one, and covering it up.

NOW – lo and behold – Joe Biden actually has two people advising him, on his board of science and technology advisers, who should care DEEPLY about this problem – if they actually ARE still scientists, and not pawns of industry and government.

Let’s meet them.

The Genetics and Evolution Girls Currently Advising Joe Biden

I kinda stumbled onto this story.

I was over on The National Pulse, looking at a link which ForGodandCountry gave me, when I found ANOTHER story in the sidebar.

LINK: https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/pfizer-board-member-is-former-facebook-director/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/T7tX2

Oh, the BOARDROOM INCEST gets better than that. That’s not even the beginning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sue_Desmond-Hellmann

This woman is the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Advising Joe Biden.

FTA:

Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellmann – a member of Pfizer Inc.’s Board of Directors – previously served as the Lead Independent Director at social media giant Facebook. The site has routinely censored posts relating to COVID-19 vaccines, with Pfizer in particular eliciting support from major corporate outlets.

Hellman was appointed to the social media platform’s board in March 2013 and served as it Lead Independent Director from June 2015 until October 30th 2019, shortly before the first reported case of COVID-19.

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook founder and CEO, said “Sue has been a wonderful and thoughtful voice on the board for six years, and I’m personally grateful to her for everything she has done for this company” in response to her departure.

“I remain positive about Facebook and the mission to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. Facebook’s Shareholders require a Board of Directors that is fully engaged and committed to address the critical issues confronting Facebook at this time,” Hellmann explained in reference to her role as the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

“Unfortunately, increasing demands from my CEO role, my extended family, and my own health make it no longer possible for me to commit the necessary time and energy required to properly serve Facebook and its shareholders,” she added in a public statement despite joining Pfizers board in 2020.

Amidst Hellmann’s tenure on the Pfizer board, Facebook has initiated campaigns to censor COVID-19 vaccine skeptics, as leaked internal documents from the company reveal algorithms aimed at “drastically reduc[ing] user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments.”

And much more.

Here is SOME of what I said to FG&C:

She links, at the highest levels:

Facebook
Pfizer
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Genentech
U.C. San. Fran.
U.C. Berkeley
AIDS research in Uganda
Rockefeller Foundation
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Federal Reserve Bank of San Fran
Global Health 2030

She’s behind a data initiative that basically reports individual patient data back to researchers to “accelerate research and learning blah-blah-blah”.

From Wikipedia:

Precision medicine based on Google Maps

In 2011, Desmond-Hellmann co-chaired a National Academy of Sciences committee that recommended creating a Google Maps-like data network aimed at developing more diagnostics and treatments tailored to individual patients — a concept known as “precision medicine”.[12] The so-called “knowledge network” would integrate the wealth of data emerging on the molecular basis of disease with information on environmental factors and patients’ electronic medical records and would allow scientists to share emerging research findings faster, thereby accelerating the development of tailored treatments. It also would allow clinicians to make more informed decisions about treatments, reduce health care costs and ultimately improve care.[13] The NAS report, titled “Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease”, was described by Keith Yamamoto, Vice Chancellor for Research at UCSF, as “the most important National Academy of Sciences Framework Analysis since that advisory body recommended that the United States go forward with the Human Genome Project”.[14]

In 2021, Desmond-Hellmann was appointed by President Joe Biden to the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), co-chaired by Frances Arnold, Eric Lander and Maria Zuber.

So – as a SIDEBAR – this woman was involved in the “freeing up” of electronic medical information which has basically DESTROYED medical privacy.

Which was GREAT for Democrat trial lawyers, by the way. Just today I got a call from AMBULANCE CHASERS based on a “confidential” diagnosis (nothing bad – don’t worry) that just went into my electronic records a few weeks ago.

I was SHOCKED that these people came on to me. It’s like Obamacare knifing my doctor in the back. The only way they knew, was access to my medical records. It should be absolutely illegal as hell for anybody – much less Democrat ambulance chasers – to know about that rare diagnosis and actually cold-call me to try to stir up a case. But yeah – destroying medical privacy in the name of helping researchers like her – that is just one example – a small example – of how “Inception” by the bad guys works. Find a smart dupe and get them to pimp an idea you need. Maybe even make them THINK they thought of it.

Free up the data with the EXCUSE of the good guys getting it, so that the BAD GUYS can do all kinds of things with it.

I know all about this – about being used as a PROXY to advance an idea because that proxy has respect as a scientist. It’s a nasty game.

Anyway….. [end of sidebar]

I am NOT of the opinion that this woman is as bad as someone like – say – Bill Gates. But I AM of the opinion that she’s very likely a politically correct “reliable board skirt” who always votes the way people are SUPPOSED to vote on board decisions. She’s Bilderberg fodder. She’s SMART and she GETS IT DONE. But she always does the “right thing” – the expected thing – the thing that somebody with more power and more control wants done.

So THIS woman is NEVER going to tell Joe Biden what Bill Gates doesn’t want him to hear.

But if there is any wonder why Joe Biden keeps trying to mandate vaccines, yeah, it’s because one of his science advisors is the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Pretty convenient.

Now – let’s move on to the other gal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Arnold

THIS ONE will not only understand what Geert Vanden Bossche is saying – she may actually respect that wisdom.

Frances Hamilton Arnold (born July 25, 1956)[1] is an American chemical engineer and Nobel Laureate. She is the Linus Pauling Professor of Chemical Engineering, Bioengineering and Biochemistry at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech). In 2018, she was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for pioneering the use of directed evolution to engineer enzymes.[2]

Since January 2021, she serves as an external co-chair of President Joe Biden‘s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST).[3]

So – THREE important points about Frances Arnold:

  • Pioneered the use of “pushed” evolution of organisms in the lab to make them useful
  • Nobel Prize winner
  • co-chair of Joe Biden’s “board” of science and technology advisors

So what’s up with this “directed evolution”?

From Wikipedia…..

Arnold is credited with pioneering the use of directed evolution to create enzymes (biochemical molecules—often proteins—that catalyze, or speed up, chemical reactions) with improved and/or novel functions.[25] The directed evolution strategy involves iterative rounds of mutagenesis and screening for proteins with improved functions and it has been used to create useful biological systems, including enzymes, metabolic pathways, genetic regulatory circuits, and organisms. In nature, evolution by natural selection can lead to proteins (including enzymes) well-suited to carry out biological tasks, but natural selection can only act on existing sequence variations (mutations) and typically occurs over long time periods.[26] Arnold speeds up the process by introducing mutations in the underlying sequences of proteins; she then tests these mutations’ effects. If a mutation improves the proteins’ function she can keep iterating the process to optimize it further. This strategy has broad implications because it can be used to design proteins for a wide variety of applications.[27] For example, she has used directed evolution to design enzymes that can be used to produce renewable fuels and pharmaceutical compounds with less harm to the environment.[25]

One advantage of directed evolution is that the mutations do not have to be completely random; instead, they can be random enough to discover unexplored potential, but not so random as to be inefficient. The number of possible mutation combinations is astronomical, but instead of just randomly trying to test as many as possible, she integrates her knowledge of biochemistry to narrow down the options, focusing on introducing mutations in areas of the protein that are likely to have the most positive effect on activity and avoiding areas in which mutations would likely be, at best, neutral and at worst, detrimental (such as disrupting proper protein folding).[25]

So – there you have it – “mutagenesis and screening“. In a way, it’s still just breeding horses or labradoodles, but much more technical and scientific.

If you suddenly think that, “Hey, this sounds a lot like what Fauci, Baric, Daszak and Bat Lady were doing” – you know – gain of function – well, that’s precisely it.

And think about this.

The SPIKE PROTEIN is a protein just like an ENZYME is protein. The only difference there, is that FAUCI and his gang were controlling the “directed evolution” of viruses making proteins toward whatever goals THEY thought useful, whereas Arnold was controlling the “directed evolution” of bacteria making proteins toward whatever goals SHE thought useful.

I remember when Arnold’s work was frequently showcased in Chemical & Engineering News. Yeah, a lot of it was feminist championing of a woman scientist by the C&EN media leftoids – BUT the fact is that Arnold’s work was very interesting stuff, and her interests and abilities always struck me as authentic – that she was NOT a “manufactured” science celebrity. She was showcased more than created.

One can argue about whether she deserved to be Beast-marked by the Dynamite Prize or not. Doesn’t really matter. To borrow from Trump, “Knowledge is the prize.”

In principle, this lady is capable of understanding and RESPECTING Geert Vanden Bossche’s arguments. If she’s going to disagree with him HONESTLY, then it will be for good reasons.

But that’s not the end of the story.

Let’s talk mutagenesis.

Remdesivir and Molnupiravir as Mutagens

Now I’m not saying that ALL of these new COVID drugs are human mutagens or teratogens. In fact, most likely, NONE of them are. The Pfizer drug is not a mutagen as far as I know – but then that drug is actually a binary drug, and one of THOSE two drugs is an established AIDS drug, which is quite fishy in light of VAIDS.

What I am saying is that TWO of these drugs are PROVEN viral mutagens.

Sorta like that critical step in Frances Arnold’s work.

So are we trying to ACCELERATE the appearance of variants? Are we consciously trying to CHANGE how or how fast they vary? Is SOMEBODY consciously trying to change how or how fast they vary?

Here is where I talked about the apparent public health contradiction of using drugs like molnupiravir and remdesivir on a virus which mutates into “variants of concern” before:

The Molnupiravir Contradiction

Why would we mass treat a virus with a drug which forces the virus to mutate, when mutation is how the virus creates new variants that reinfect the vaccinated? Before I explain the title contradiction, let me start with an admission. Most of my life, I have been very friendly with the pharmaceutical industry. I …

In that blog post, I explained that (1) remdesivir has been PROVEN to “push” SARS-CoV-2 toward evolution of variants, including “variants of concern”, and (2) molnupiravir works on the principle of “mutation catastrophe” in the SARS-CoV-2 reproductive process, so it likely does the same thing even more.

So are we “doing the Arnold” or what?

I will leave that up to others to answer.

Let me close instead with one more great article which summarizes where we are.

It’s Vanden Bossche without Vanden Bossche.

Eugyppius & The Conservation of Corona

If you have not found this anonymous German dude’s substack account, you need to be watching it. It’s almost better than Alex Berenson’s account, which is a pretty hard thing to do.

Among several great posts, this one is critical.

Let me just quote the first few paragraphs.

FTA:

The ascendancy of more transmissible (and possibly also more pathogenic) Delta strains is a consequence of the worldwide vaccination campaign. This is now the most salient and the most important side-effect of our vaccines. They elicit antibodies that select for more aggressive SARS-2 lineages, which escape vaccine-induced immunity by replicating in the lungs of infected people faster and earlier.

All our evidence is that the alpha (Kent) and delta (Indian) lineages emerged at the same time, in September or October 2020. Delta was more aggressive than alpha, but alpha had the upper hand until vaccines killed it off. Probably, Delta is too aggressive in completely unvaccinated populations, causing severe illness before very many of its hosts can do much spreading.

Consider the entirely typical case of my country, Germany. Most first doses here were administered over the course of nine weeks, from early April to early July. In precisely this period, Delta began its rise to absolute dominance. The genetic diversity of SARS-2 has been totally destroyed in Germany and everywhere else too.

What you see happening to Alpha in this chart, is what the vaccines were supposed to do to Corona as a whole. But then it was Corona’s move, and Delta is the hand it played.

Nothing about how the pandemic plays out now can be disentangled from the vaccines. The more aggressive spread of Delta among the unvaccinated is as much a part of this campaign, as its continued spread among the vaccinated. We have totally changed the environment in which SARS-2 circulates, and in response SARS-2 has become more transmissible and more volatile across the board.

MORE: https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/the-conservation-of-corona

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/vhrEk

SO – have I convinced you of the obvious? I’m convinced.

DA RONA-COASTA IS POWAHED BY DA VAXX.

It’s bloody obvious.

So are they incompetent or evil? Or maybe both?

Your call. I’m just watching from the cheap seats.

And getting ready for the Biden Depression.

Cheers, Eugyppius and Geert. You guys get da Woof Prize.

W

Name & Shame: Edward Hospital in Naperville, Illinois Tried to Murder Sun Ng and Failed

I’ve talked about this story before, but it turns out that it’s actually WORSE than I thought.

This is the story of the hospital in Illinois that fought to prevent a patient from getting ivermectin, but after multiple judicial interventions, the patient was finally treated and LIVED.

Well, it turns out that the hospital actually tried to pull the plug on the guy, and his daughter refused.

And it’s even worse than THAT.

Seriously.

Just read this stuff. Hospitals have been turned into Nazi death camps in America.

Thanks to Karl Denninger for bringing this to my attention.

LINK 1: No, You Cuck. This Is How

LINK 2: Horowitz: Why every red state has an obligation to fight hospitals killing patients on ventilators

FTA:

According to a court affidavit, at the time Ng was “in the same state for many, many days … critically ill,” and a nurse suggested that Dr. Ng “stop all this aggressive care and let [her father] die naturally.” On November 5, after Ng was on a ventilator for three weeks, DuPage County Circuit Court Judge Paul Fullerton ruled in favor of the family and allowed Dr. Bain to administer 24mg doses of ivermectin from Nov. 8 through Nov. 12. The result? Within five days, he was able to breathe without the ventilator and on Nov. 16 walked out of the ICU. By this past Sunday, Ng was breathing without supplemental oxygen on a regular hospital floor.

Shockingly, the lawyers had to go through five different appearances in this case just to save this man’s life from a hospital that senselessly blocked lifesaving treatment. Originally, the judge dissolved his order because the doctors lied and said the patient was getting better. Then they blocked Dr. Bain from administering the ivermectin because he wasn’t vaccinated. According to reporter Mary Beth Pfeiffer, Judge Fullerton overruled the hospital again because he had testimony from a hospital doctor who estimated that “someone in his condition being on a ventilator like that has a 10 or 15 percent chance of survival.”

Ralph Lorigo, the lawyer on this case, told me that the patient was able to extubate himself from the ventilator, yet the hospital is still appealing the decision! How dare this man live! “You shouldn’t have to have a lawyer to come out alive,” said Lorigo in an interview with TheBlaze.

Horowitz (second link) thinks state attorneys general need to get involved.

There is an immediate need for every attorney general to do battle with these hospitals and every legislature to pass a law specifically barring hospitals from blocking any patient from seeking the use of an FDA-approved drug at the direction of a physician to treat COVID. Hospitals cannot be allowed to become prisons where patients are denied rights they would otherwise have.

Denninger thinks that we have to actually start CHARGING hospital administrators with felony crimes such as murder.

The way you stop it is simple: Charge the hospital administrators with felony manslaughter for each and every Covid-19 patient who dies and is either (1) denied medication they, their family or their physicians want to use OR (2) is given Remdesivir, which generates a rebuttable presumption that the drug killed them and not the virus.

Said presumption can be rebutted by autopsy if and only if their kidneys and liver are not damaged, which is what the drug does.

Charge the hospital administrators with felony manslaughter for everyone they kill this way and watch their tune change immediately.

Oh, and people will stop dying of Covid-19 too.

Until and unless you advocate and in fact demand that **** you Mr. Auschwitz.

I suppose Denninger is engaged in some typical friendly fire there, but still – the fact is, SOMEBODY has to make these punks sweat.

And it ain’t gonna be KAPO at DODGE or the Coiffured Commie at FIB. They’re after the TRUTH-TELLERS.

It’s very clear that SOCIALIST MEDICINE / MEDICAL SOCIALISM does not give a damn if it kills you.

It may even WANT TO DO IT.

Act accordingly.

W

Is Team GOF-Grift at NIH and Pfizer Dog-Whistling to Dirty Merrick Garland for the Next Gestapo Action?

Or did Dodge-and-Fib arrange the drama, as with the National School Board rogue Democrats?

mood music:

If you’ve been following the machinations of the DOJ-FBI-KGB-SS during the major distraction of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, then you already know that DOJ-FBI sent their first school board jack-boots after a “super-mom” in Colorado, under the pretext of “domestic terrorism”.

FBI Jackboots Break Down Door and Raid Home of America’s Mom

November 20, 2021 | Sundance | 26 Comments

https://youtu.be/J8rt-ME4QYo?list=TLGG03ULS_GdB6QyMTExMjAyMQ

The reality is that this woman – who knows county clerk Tina Peters of Dominion whistle-blower fame – has been very effective in Colorado politics, particularly against the CRT-SEL scam which enriches A.G. Merrick “Kapo” Garland’s family business of undermining American society toward some race-nutty Democrat Bolshevik “utopia” based on permanent animosity between blacks and “selectively defined whites”.

Yeah, let me repeat that, for the sake of the clarity of their camouflage. We’re talking about the “I’m not white, I’m Jewish” scam. Whatever.

Let’s ignore the Obama Third Term’s sick mind-frack. Bolsheviks – of all former religions and perpetually aggrieved races – even against their own – no longer define reality for the majority of Americans. We are ON to their games. And the reality on the ground is this. “Kapo” Garland is moving on from merely imprisoning “January Sixers” to going after America’s highly effective and grass-roots-winning “Super-Moms”.

Isn’t that just HITLER? Go after the civilians. Go after the women and children. FRANCE remembers.

What a P.O.S. that man is. Almost as bad as his Fuehrer, Obama.

Not Biden – OBAMA.

Now, let me be more blunt.

If you think they’re never coming for YOU, you are sorely mistaken. Whatever it is, on their bucket list of neo-Soviet globalist fascist tyranny, they’re going after it. And YOU are in the way.

FIRST Kapo came for the Trump election protesters. The SICK TRICK of the BUFFALO JUMP.

THEN Kapo came for the super-moms.

So WHO is NEXT?

I think it’s US – the TRUE JOURNALISTS AND SCIENTISTS FIGHTING THE COVID GRIFT.

I think it’s people like Alex Berenson, FLCCC doctors, Karl Denninger, Peter McCullough, Steve Kirsch, and anybody else – ME INCLUDED – and Sundance, too – anybody who is now acting as a REAL JOURNALIST or a REAL SCIENTIST, when the CORPORATE FAKE MEDIA and PAID-OFF SCIENCE are all failing terribly to DO THEIR DUTIES.

Why do I think this?

THIRD TIME IS A CHARM.

Yes, there was some GROUNDWORK laid for this stuff, when KGB-FBI went after Simone Gold with the usual 20 guns media psy-op.

DOJ/FBI Watch – Using Investigative Creep To Begin East German-Style Political Intimidation Raids

This is a HEADS UP to all authentic American patriots about our phony globo-nazi “friends” in DOJ and FBI, otherwise known as “Dodge” and “FIB”. Let me give you the TL;DR right here. The Bidenistas and Bidenazis are going to try to GO CANADA during however long they remain in power. “FIB” is going to …

However, I have now seen THREE calls for us “dissident scientists and journalists” to be rounded up.

Let’s take a look at them.

1. Prof. Peter Hotez, Vaccine Expert

The first bizarre play in this little game was an establishment vaccine scientist, Dr. Peter Hotez, coming up with a whacky sound-bite by proposing that people who criticized Anthony Fauci needed to be arrested.

https://www.thecollegefix.com/professor-suggests-it-should-be-a-federal-hate-crime-to-criticize-fauci-and-other-government-funded-scientists/

WHUT?

This guy is normally pretty level-headed, and I used to quote him all the time on vaccine science.

But YES, he not only SAID it – he tweeted about it, and wrote a column.

Yeah, let’s just save that sucker before Twitter deletes it or the dude closes his account. Or when Fauci is finally brought to justice, Hotez will likely claim he never said this, and will delete the tweet.

Of course, this seemed pretty hilarious to everybody at the time. But I now think it was predictive programming served up for the progzis at Dodge and Fib.

Roughly six months before needed. Yup. They were getting out ahead of us.

We were actually rather lucky, in that Hotez fired off this crap before all the PROOF broke that – Yes, Virginia – all of Hotez’s earnestly defended buddies really did perform gain-of-function experiments in China, and they KNEW IT.

Hotez looked pretty dorky after that. Rand Paul had a field day.

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MORE!

2. Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO

The second case of somebody on Team Spike Protein calling for “arrests” – although perhaps a bit more discreetly – was Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla.

This guy is a bit of an actor, which I can tell you is a “quality” of some Big Pharma C-level stiffs – at least from my limited number of interactions with them. They will gladly and openly run scripted con games as a form of business dealings. I kid you not. I was shocked the first time I ran into it. And indeed, Bourla already engaged in a kind of patent medicine shill act with Israel, when he was “not allowed to come” because he wasn’t “fully vaccinated”.

Oy vey. THE CRINGE. Stage left!

Such a hammy operation. We used to fall for this stuff. But no more.

Bear in mind that Israel and Pfizer cut a HUGE deal, and were BEST OF CHUMS when it was done.

Whatever. As long as Israel minds it’s own business……..

Yeah. I know. “Allies.”

Anyway, Bourla has really been feeling the heat from all sides, so he decided the smart thing to do was to label us – the “purveyors of misinformation” – as “criminals”.

Not smart, it seemed at first.

LINK: https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/11/09/pfizer-ceo-bourla-people-who-spread-misinformation-on-covid-vaccines-are-criminals/

Notice that this was done in conjunction with that nasty globonazi “Atlantic Council”, who already partnered onto a thousand LIES. FIGURES.

Here is the video:

Again, this seemed like stupid bait for a lot of bad press.

But these people are not stupid. Trust me.

So we have a voice from ACADEMIA, and a voice from INDUSTRY, both BEGGING Kapo to do something.

Who do they need NEXT?

Ah, yes. GOVERNMENT.

3. NIH Director Francis Collins

This was the one where I invoked the “James Bond rule” and said – OK – this makes three of them – we’re looking at “enemy action”.

Don’t mistake the crafty Drax for NIH Director Francis Collins. Collins is one of the best FRONTS that Obama ever had. Collins was crafted by the Clinton and Obama administrations into “The old Christian scientist that the rubes will trust.” I was never quite sure WHY Francis Collins was not merely tolerated by Obama and company, but seemingly showcased. Well, by now, in the THIRD OBAMA TERM, it’s very clear.

In the same way that goofball James Clapper served as a kind of “useful idiot” in DNI, Collins served as a “useful befuddled genius” in NIH, to chill any suspicions of nasty goings-on in the now-communized sci-med-bio complex.

It is VERY instructive to read the Wikipedia entry for Francis Collins. The thing that will jog your memory is the word “ethics”. Yes. Remember when this guy was pure as the driven snow? We TRUSTED him.

This was the primary reason for the communists, globalists, and Third Way fascists having Collins as a facade for the various scammy goings-on that have plagued American science, mostly during and after the Obama administration, where it all got “set up” for the big 2020 scamapalooza.

I could spend a lot of time going back and showcasing all the good things Francis Collins did over his long career, and they are considerable, but quite frankly, the Fake News Media has done an excellent job of that. I defer to them.

It’s the other stuff – all the stuff that the corporate fake news STUDIOUSLY IGNORED, that I – most unfortunately – need to detail for you.

Francis Collins apparently “misspoke” in denying that people under him were funding viral gain-of-function (GOF) research in China. Whether or not that is connected to his resignation, the fact remains – Collins announced his resignation / retirement in early October – shortly after his “misstatements” were made public.

LINK: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/10/04/report-francis-collins-nih-director-resign-coronavirus-pandemic/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/K1d6c

This one is worth a read.

A bit of a sad end to Collins’ illustrious career. I like to think that, somewhere behind the scenes, on the way to submitting his resignation, Collins told his “handlers” and “superiors” to go jump in a lake – that he was no longer going to cover for them.

PFFFFFFT!

Dream on, idiot Wolf. The noble science you signed up for never existed.

Yeah, I’m a CHUMP SUPREME on that one, because on his way out the door, what does Collins do?

He chooses GATES NUMBER THREE!

LINK: https://summit.news/2021/11/20/nih-director-calls-for-covid-conspiracists-to-be-brought-to-justice/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/IfqZO

Yeah, what do you EXPECT from a DOUBLE-MASKIE?

Let’s just reply to THAT with WOLF’S DICTUM:

“Authority misinformation is a far greater danger than popular misinformation.”

Think about it, Francis. It’s SCIENCE.

Add to this the principle that SCRUTINY BEGINS AT HOME, and I would say it’s time for NIH to clean it’s own house FIRST, so we don’t have to do it.

CASE IN POINT?

When NIH and Gilead Pharmaceuticals CLEARLY conspired to hide the kidney toxicity of remdesivir by blaming it on a commonly used excipient.

NIH and Gilead Blamecasting Remdesivir Renal Toxicity to an Excipient

Well, they can lock us out of The Q Tree, but they can’t stop the truth from getting out. Enjoy a post first over on The U Tree and now HERE. Here is a quickie in my WAR ON REMDESIVIR. Fellow Treeper barkerjim dropped an interesting document today, from back in July, which showed the …

There are plenty of links in that reference, and in those references, too, for anybody who WANTS to see if remdesivir might be toxic, to LOOK FOR THEMSELVES.

Better to look for yourself, Francis, than to trust a guy like Fauci.

This is where having a nice old doufus like Francis Collins pays off for Team Obama. The man is a sitting duck for the “Nazis of Nice”, as I like to call them. Collins was oblivious to his own mistake of trusting sneaky, crafty, sketchy guys like Anthony Fauci.

Collins is not alone there. Franklin Graham is another great example.

Pushed the vaccine, and got pericarditis from it – never said a word of consideration that this was straight out of the vaccine risks he has pushed aside. I suspect that the thought never occurred to him that maybe he was wrong – but if it did, he must have decided to go along with the CDC “white lie” of “vaccine hesitancy must by stopped at all costs” – CLEARLY A DEVIL’S DEAL, when MANDATES and CDC LIES rule the day – to say nothing of the lay-person-obvious “no contraindications to the vaccine” fallacy.

Come on, Frankie. WAKE UP. You’re in STALINVILLE now. THEY JUST LIE.

Anthony Fauci and Rochelle Walensky have made fools of us all, by taking vaccine hesitancy – a METRIC of vaccine success or failure – and turning it into an ANATHEMA to be fought by all means possible – even the grandest of dishonesties.

Yes – PINTO hesitancy was bad. We really should have fought that, too.

Yes – AIDS hesitancy was bad. And I guess we did fight that, using gay pride in schools.

See how it works?

A GRIFT fit for a KING.

And the MARKS and SUCKERS who line up for it, are born every minute.

LINK: https://www.christianpost.com/news/franklin-graham-undergoes-surgery-at-mayo-clinic-for-heart-issue.html

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/Fsffn

So here we are. Francis Collins’ final act is to call out for Herod’s men to go off looking for those conspiracy babies.

Good job, Francis. You’re not as impressive of a fool as the other Francis, but you tried.

In any case, we’ll handle the ethics now. This is not the world you thought it was.

You need the special glasses, and the will to put them on.

W

The Molnupiravir Contradiction

Why would we mass treat a virus with a drug which forces the virus to mutate, when mutation is how the virus creates new variants that reinfect the vaccinated?

Before I explain the title contradiction, let me start with an admission.

Most of my life, I have been very friendly with the pharmaceutical industry. I have eloquently defended Big Pharma, the FDA, “government and corporate medical science”, and all those things that the Biden administration so earnestly defends now.

I even got an award sponsored by one of those Big Pharma companies – which is not to say much, because they give out a LOT of them. In fact, the grooming of young scientists to revere Big Pharma, is no different from the grooming of doctors (and now medical bureaucrats, who know less “talk-back” science) to promote and prescribe their products.

If you go back and look through my posts here, you will see that my thinking about Big Pharma has only evolved slowly from starry-eyed hope and blissful faith. I was quite earnest in my wishes that some of their new products might be better than doctor-discovered, repurposed, off-label drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

What I would NOT do, was deny the obvious effectiveness of those cheap, plentiful, and SAFE doctor-discovered drugs.

If the world was against HCQ, then “Lupus contra mundum” (Wolf against the world).

Why so? Because the DATA on these two drugs killing virus and preventing death was so alarmingly GOOD. You just have to be HONEST and INDEPENDENT to see it. Then, you just ask WHY. And the answers came.

It was BEAUTIFUL. It was SCIENCE.

Even when it was ugly. Like the Lancetgate Effect.

I’m a DATA GUY. I know WHICH data matters and WHICH data doesn’t. I can SEE THROUGH CURVES like a horny guy next to a woman in bed in the dark, seeing her under the sheets. With DATA, I can see through walls. I can see around corners. I have escaped death many times by seeing what nobody else saw.

It’s a gift from GOD, and I don’t waste it.

I really WANTED remdesivir to work, but then I saw the numbers. I could not unsee them. I was forced to admit that the drug DID not work, and COULD not work, in large part because it was being administered too late.

Antivirals work best EARLY, when they have an overwhelming numerical advantage – which is very hard to obtain over an EXPONENTIAL ENEMY. But if you administer early, even ATYPICAL antivirals like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, in proper ANTIVIRAL doses, have a chance.

Remdesivir is fairly toxic stuff, and when administered too late, when the virus is long gone, it kills its victims in a way surprisingly similar to what late-stage COVID does, by kidney failure, and then pulmonary dysfunction which looks like pneumonia. So if you administer remdesivir to dying COVID patients, it may not do THEM any good, but it will make YOU a whole lot of money on their deaths, which are thus ENSURED. And YOU won’t get caught doing it, because it all looks like COVID.

SLICK.

And WE have covered remdesivir before.

Remdesivir Is How We Bring Down The Temple of Faucism

NIH and Gilead Blamecasting Remdesivir Renal Toxicity to an Excipient

OAN Hosts Amazing Anonymous Documentary on Discovery and Suppression of Ivermectin for COVID, and How Gilead and Fauci Gamed a Remdesivir Study

And last but not least:

The Murder of Veronica Wolski by Fauci and Gilead’s Zyklon D

There will be justice for Veronica Wolski, because we will DEMAND IT. And until there IS justice, we will drag the CRIMES of Anthony Fauci and Gilead “Pharmaceuticals” and their SLEAZY ASSOCIATES thorough the headlines, over and over, until people SPIT IN THEIR PATH as they walk down the streets. So where do we begin? …

Remdesivir goes really well with murderous vents and no prior therapeutics, and NO, NO, NO ivermectin allowed, which – DO TELL – is exactly how the Stalinist Biden-Obama-Harris administration and its CHINAZI allies kill off us pesky American seniors.

But that’s getting a little ahead of things. We’ll come back to remdesivir.

First – molnupiravir.

Molnupiravir was once called EIDD-2801, back when it was more of a hope and a dream.

I had high hopes for molnupiravir back then. I had hoped it would be a significantly better antiviral than hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, both of which are antiparasitics first, and antivirals second – and at that, only by a bit of luck. But that LUCK can SAVE YOUR LIFE.

That was back when I didn’t realize how diabolical the people who CONTROL Big Pharma really are – that they would SHIT on a lucky, life-saving break, just for money.

As it turns out, molnupiravir is roughly as good as the cheaper drugs, but definitely not as safe.

Nevertheless, molnupiravir is NEW, it’s PATENTABLE, and it’s a MONEYMAKER. The system is RIGGED, and thus we are DENIED the cheaper, safer drugs, so that our money will fund expensive drug research.

Whatever. That is just the way things are. I didn’t know that, when I was a student. I didn’t realize that the system was actually corrupt. Although the system probably wasn’t as bad back then, either.

Chinese communist ethics have filtered into America, and they have not done Big Pharma any good.

Would I take molnupiravir? Maybe. If I had to pick ONE, it would probably be ivermectin. Second choice, hydroxychloroquine. Third, molnupiravir. I don’t think I would take remdesivir next – I’d probably try acyclovir. That stuff really WORKED for my shingles – TWICE. It might not work on a coronavirus, but at least it wouldn’t kill my kidneys.

Now that you know how I feel about the drugs, let’s talk about WHY I feel that way. But in a roundabout and very telling manner.

Here is a synthesis of molnupiravir from cytidine – the molecule that it mimics in order to kill RNA viruses, including SARS-CoV-2.

If you look at the molecular structure of molnupiravir above, on the right, you will see two rings. The pentagonal ring with an “O” (oxygen) is a SUGAR ring, and the hexagonal ring with two “N” (nitrogen) atoms is a BASE ring.

Together, those two rings are ALMOST a nucleoside – a component of RNA – called cytidine, shown above on the LEFT, or below.

The only real differences between molnupiravir and cytidine, as shown, are the tail on the left of molnupiravir, hanging off the left-hand O group (and which really only helps the delivery of the drug), and more importantly, that extra “OH” group, hanging off the right-hand NH group of the molnupiravir molecule, in the diagram above.

Add that OH group to cytidine, and you have N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC) – the “real” drug being administered, also known as EIDD-1931. Add that little ester tail on the left, to make a nice orally active and bioavailable “prodrug” of NHC, and you have molnupiravir, or EIDD-2801.

That OH group totally screws things up. It’s absolutely AMAZING what that does to the genetic machinery of the virus, inside YOU.

FAKE cytidine, like FAKE NEWS, kills.

There is a great but still fairly technical explanation of how molnupiravir works that was published in Nature, called “Molnupiravir: Coding for Catastrophe“. You can download a PDF of the article HERE.

The abstract is very useful:

Molnupiravir, a wide-spectrum antiviral that is currently in phase 2/3 clinical trials for the treatment of COVID-19, is proposed to inhibit viral replication by a mechanism known as ‘lethal mutagenesis’. Two recently published studies reveal the biochemical and structural bases of how molnupiravir disrupts the fidelity of SARS-CoV-2 genome replication and prevents viral propagation by fostering error accumulation in a process referred to as ‘error catastrophe’.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41594-021-00657-8

I used part of one graphic from the paper for the feature image of this article. That graphic shows crude, flattened structures of both molnupiravir, and the fully phosphorylated fake nucleotide that gets incorporated into the virus RNA, which is called molnupiravir triphosphate, or MTP.

Technically, it’s really not molnupiravir any more, after that prodrug ester gets replaced by a triphosphate unit – it should really be called N4-hydroxycytidine triphosphate. But that pickiness is confusing – MTP is still very true in spirit, and that’s FINE with us big picture types.

Now – THIS is where it all happens. This is where THINGS GO WRONG, and the drug starts to work.

That OH group hanging off the NH of molnupiravir CHANGES the nature of the nitrogen atom to which it is attached, and in a BIG way. Suddenly, the little hydrogen atom that is attached to that nitrogen, would almost rather be located on the OTHER nitrogen in the ring, instead of staying where it is, on the sideshain nitrogen, next to OH. In fact, that hydrogen atom almost stops caring which place it stays. This is a phenomenon called tautomerism. It’s a molecule that can exist in two forms.

One little proton. It’s now happy either way.

But RNA? It ain’t happy.

So what happens, is MTP goes into RNA where CTP should go. And once M is in there where C should be, M can’t make up its mind where that little proton should go. If the machinery sees M with the hydrogen where C would keep it, the machinery does the right thing, and M just gets treated like C. No mutation. But if the hydrogen is in the other place, the machinery thinks M is actually U, and a mutation occurs.

You can see that in this next diagram, where the “hydroxylamine” (-NHOH) form binds correctly with GTP, but the “oxime” form (=NOH) binds INCORRECTLY with ATP.

In the next graphic, you can see how M gets incorporated for C, and starts to cause problems by leading to U instead of C. The events shown in the graphic follow a sequence I’ll try to describe.

If you can’t follow it, don’t worry. This stuff is always confusing when you track the changes.

Starting from the top, below……

  • one ringer M is already present (top strand), while M competes with C to match the next G (two choices shown waiting)
  • the second ringer M goes in on the bottom strand, to match the G, where C should have gone
  • the second ringer M (now on top, follow UACGM from left) is then matched with a new A (WRONG) on the bottom, instead of a G (two choices shown). You can also see (and this is very complicated) that the first ringer M was matched with a G (now shown on top), and that G has already matched up to ANOTHER (third) ringer M, now on the bottom strand in the third subgraphic.
  • the strand with incorrect A (follow UMAA from right to left on bottom, now on TOP, right to left) is then matched with a U on the second A, completing the screw-up from C to U
  • the net effect, bottom strand, is that UACG[C] (top of diagram, what should have happened) became UACG[U] (bottom of diagram, what did happen)

One can look at this whole process as N4-Hydroxycytidine (M) cutting in line where C was supposed to go, and then handing things off to the WRONG base, so that C gets replaced by U.

Complicated, isn’t it? But THAT is how mutations are PROMOTED by this drug, and they are KEY to how it works. There is an AVALANCHE of mutations that kills the virus. The whole idea is that the DRUG makes the virus mutate too much, too fast, into non-viable forms, and it just dies – or at least enough for your immune system to take over and WIN the fight. The virus CRASHES because of the drug. Meanwhile, the body mounts a defense.

You can read the rest of the article if you want, and get some sense of the complexity of considerations as to whether this makes a good drug or not for the individual.

There IS a legitimate question of whether screwing up the RNA of the virus, might also lead to screw ups in the host – either in RNA or DNA, leading to things like birth defects, cancer, adverse events during therapy, etc.

That concern is nicely summarized in a Zero Hedge article:

“Proceed With Caution At Your Own Peril” – Merck’s COVID ‘Super Drug’ Poses Serious Health Risks, Scientists Warn

BY TYLER DURDEN

SATURDAY, OCT 09, 2021 – 05:22 AM

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/proceed-caution-your-own-peril-mercks-covid-super-drug-poses-serious-health-risks

Now, I’m not really interested – for the purposes of this article – in the question of whether or not there are INDIVIDUAL dangers posed by molnupiravir, due to either mutations of the host, OR the forcing of mutation of the virus in that host.

There are excellent reasons to believe, that just like vaccines don’t really pose INDIVIDUAL risks through mutation of the virus in any particular victim, there is no significant individual risk from mutations of the virus due to a mutagenic drug.

HOWEVER, that’s not my concern.

My concern is related to Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche’s concern about mass vaccination during a pandemic. He differentiates between the idea of a vaccine being good for an individual, and that vaccine being good public policy for humanity as a whole, ultimately including that individual.

Geert’s concern is that a virus AS A WHOLE – as a global population – as almost an ecosystem – will evolve due to pressure from a non-sterilizing vaccine, to create new strains that will resist the vaccine. Thus, while the vaccine may benefit an individual in the short term, it ultimately does NOT benefit the sum of all individuals, who will ALL suffer from the mutated virus, which would not have happened, absent the specific evolutionary pressure of the vaccine.

If Geert is right, it’s not just stupid to “vaccinate ourselves into trouble” – it’s downright EVIL.

We have already seen Geert’s prediction apparently (wait for it) fulfilled with the delta strain of SARS-CoV-2, which basically ignores vaccines against “wild type” Wuhan coronavirus.

But again, that is not STRICTLY my concern.

Then what IS my concern?

Original predictions, based on the mutation of the original Wuhan coronavirus, were that the virus was genetically contained – that it was not mutating into significantly different forms requiring changes in the vaccine. And yet, something seems to have CHANGED that. The early predictions could have been WRONG, but they could also have been UNDERMINED. And they could have been undermined by the same terrible logic of “we have to pass it to see what’s in it”, or “we have to try to MAKE the virus catch in human cells, to see if it CAN catch in human cells”.

You see what I mean? There could be “dishonest science” and other such “skulduggery” here, just like we have seen with LIARS like Fauci, Baric, Tedros, and China.

My concern is that in Geert Vanden Bossche’s scenario, which I have described as “coronavirus variant whack-a-mole”, it will only be made WORSE by drugs which encourage the mutation of the virus.

In other words, mass vaccination into a pandemic with “leaky” vaccines is bad, but to do so while chemically promoting the mutation of the virus is even worse.

Thus, not only is it CONTRADICTORY to vaccinate in such a scenario – it is EVEN MORE contradictory to promote mutation in such a scenario.

And – worse than THAT – it appears that we have ALREADY BEEN DOING IT – with remdesivir.

Remdesivir is notable as being an antiviral which is generally being given to patients, with no hope of it actually working, long after the SARS-CoV-2 virus has done its dirty work, and those patients are ACTUALLY dying of a cytokine storm. These patients may still be producing and shedding some virus, but the sum of all studies is rather definitive at this point – remdesivir does little except LENGTHEN the stay of patients in the hospital.

Well, what are those patients doing there, staying too long in the hospital?

One strong possibility is that these dying patients are creating mutants and variants. The following paper shows what happens to SARS-CoV-2 virus when confronted in vitro with remdesivir – and it is basically what I am predicting will happen with molnupiravir.

In vitro evolution of Remdesivir resistance reveals genome plasticity of SARS-CoV-2

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.01.429199v1.full

ABSTRACT

Remdesivir (RDV) is used widely for COVID-19 patients despite varying results in recent clinical trials. Here, we show how serially passaging SARS-CoV-2 in vitro in the presence of RDV selected for drug-resistant viral populations. We determined that the E802D mutation in the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase was sufficient to confer decreased RDV sensitivity without affecting viral fitness. Analysis of more than 200,000 sequences of globally circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants show no evidence of widespread transmission of RDV-resistant mutants. Surprisingly, we also observed changes in the Spike (i.e., H69 E484, N501, H655) corresponding to mutations identified in emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants indicating that they can arise in vitro in the absence of immune selection. This study illustrates SARS-CoV-2 genome plasticity and offers new perspectives on surveillance of viral variants.

Now this is moderately straightforward, but the big picture is not apparent, because the authors know they are playing with dynamite, so I’m going to restate what they found in more direct language.

Bottom line up front, they basically found evidence that remdesivir does exactly what I’m thinking molnupiravir will do – which is to promote mutation per se, including into “variants of concern”, independently of drug resistance evolutionary considerations, which makes tons of sense.

A mutagenic drug (or rather a drug which works on the principle of mutagenesis) creates mutations with high frequency on a large scale, without the need for evolution to strongly amplify rare beneficial mutations. But at the same time we don’t see – in the wild – any evolution of resistance to remdesivir (RDV). The paper spells this out.

So let’s look at what the study found:

“in vitro with omnipresent RDV” – we see both appearance of variants of concern AND resistance to RDV

“in vivo with late-stage RDV” – we see appearance of variants of concern but NO resistance to RDV

[ The second is a bit of a joke – I’m talking about what we see in the wild globally – no RDV resistance. ]

How can this be rationalized?

In the in vitro case, resistance to RDV is a NECESSITY forced upon the virus. All mutations must persist under omnipresent high concentrations of RDV, so this is a pressure that cannot be worked around or escaped from. Yes, RDV benefits the virus by assisting mutation, despite doing it “too much”, which forces resistance to occur. And what IS the resistance? It is for the virus to continue propagating, both unhindered by RDV yet also assisted by RDV. So, essentially, SARS-CoV-2 and RDV negotiate to the point where the “benefits” of RDV to speed up mutation don’t diminish the viability of the virus. The virus learns to USE the ringer nucleoside M to mutate faster, without dying from it. Thus, we see evolution of traits that have benefited SARS-CoV-2 in the wild, plus evolution of a trait of adaptation to RDV.

In the in vivo case, in a Petri dish called “planet Earth”, resistance to RDV is NOT a necessity. The virus has plenty of hosts who are not using it, so it negotiates more strongly to a better deal. It takes all the mutations it can get from RDV, but it does NOT accept the need to mutate to adapt to RDV. THAT particular mutation is unnecessary for most of the virus, so it is not forced to cut that deal.

Bottom line question: Does RDV in the wild speed up mutation?

My answer: I would bet money on it. It appears to do so in the lab.

And if I’m right, enhancement of mutation should happen even more strongly for molnupiravir, which has a more clearly mutagenic mechanism of action than remdesivir.

The authors simply refer to the plasticity of the VIRUS, because woe unto them if they talked about a Big Pharma drug being a promoter of viral plasticity-COUGH-mutation. But that is exactly what the in vitro results mean here. They were able to generate the “variants of concern” in the lab, using exposure to remdesivir.

They went looking for mutations for resistance to remdesivir, and they not only found one of those – they found MORE mutations, including ones matching “variants of concern”.

WHY?

Well, let’s go back to the original point:

Why would we mass treat a virus with a drug which forces the virus to mutate, when mutation is how the virus creates new variants that reinfect the vaccinated?

In my opinion, it is REASONABLE to expect that any drug which operates as a “ringer” nucleoside – as BOTH remdesivir AND molnupiravir do – is going to cause SOME level of genetic errors – a.k.a. mutations – as a consequence. You can dress up pro and con arguments in fancy language, but scientific common sense points one to the likelihood that a fake nucleoside will operate to some extent, if not to its main extent, as BAD DATA in the tape of life. And THAT means MUTATIONS.

And if remdesivir was doing it, then molnupiravir should do it on STEROIDS.

And I am NOT going to let Fauci explain his way out of this one by any kind of hand-waving, or Shifty-Schiff experiments like Lancetgate.

So where does this go?

I was having a lot of trouble figuring out why the push for remdesivir made sense to a particular PART of the corrupt forces behind the Plandemic.

Remember – AND logic.

In any rally of a giant societal “conspiracy”, which can be as big as:

  • “Let’s all go to the New World for each of our own reasons! It’s OURS!”
  • “The Islamic world attacked our towers! Let’s DO SOMETHING!”
  • “The other people are INSURRECTIONISTS! Arrest them!”
  • “White supremacists! Take away their rights!”
  • “It’s airborne Ebola! Civil rights out the window! We’re all gonna die!”

…..there is always a REASON for every aspect and for every beneficiary, but they’re usually quite different reasons, specific to the individual or group, and thus profoundly motivating.

In other words, these are “conspiracies of fortune”, in which MOST buy in not in an illegal way, but in either an immoral, amoral, or self-deceiving way. Some truly guilty ones secretly initiate the money-grab, and everybody else goes along, making true justice impossible.

It’s a great scam. It happens for ALL of the reasons – not just any one of them.

Still, in that context, things tend to make sense, but generally after the fact.

The advancement of remdesivir just didn’t make SENSE. More than that, its whole terrible history was wrapped up with the liar Anthony Fauci.

But if you back up even further – a useful tactic when things don’t make sense – one comes to the realization that many things about antivirals just don’t make sense.

  • we have good safe ones that “they” seem to hate now, upon their “discovery”
  • those drugs were never promoted or studied properly, IMO
  • the excuses for not vigorously pursuing the class of drugs BEFORE, ring VERY hollow NOW
  • the main class of “allowed” antivirals (ringer nucleosides) seems fundamentally flawed
  • the fundamental flaw (that we are using genetic error as a “cure”) is never acknowledged
  • the fact that we have to cure diseases that never had to exist, like SARS-CoV-2, fails to outrage any of the people in charge, who pushed these Frankenstein gain-of-function experiments to begin with
  • there is a bizarre fixation of vaccines as the only allowed solution to viral disease
  • genetic vaccines are pushed, when antigen vaccines are obviously fundamentally safer
  • genetic antivirals are pushed, when other categories are obviously both safer AND more effective

The LAST points seem to show some commonality, both in leading toward the massive money pit of gene therapy, and in relating to Anthony Fauci.

And THAT is where things start to make sense. The POLITICAL aspects of this. The installation of World Government, their holy grail.

Fauci, Baric, Daszak, Rick Bright, and Hillary Clinton all know what is actually going on – I am convinced of that. They are all knowledgeable, more than others, in the true agenda and schedule of the “Plandemic”, including the POLITICAL GOALS. They understand both the SCAM and the NOBLE (lying) PURPOSE.

I am convinced that VARIANTS are a key construct in the giant grift of COVID. The whole plan has to keep going, by ginning up more COVID as needed, but it also has to look NATURAL, so that nobody finally decides to send about 100 cruise missiles into Wuhan and a spare 20 into various Swiss cities, which would end this entire Globonazi / Chinazi farce once and for all.

OK. Save some for North Carolina and Canada, too. It’s complicated.

They COULD make more variants and release them, but nobody wants to screw up and get caught, like they already have been caught, time and time again, to the point that the whole Globonazi plan might finally get run down like a rabid dog in the middle of the road.

The fact of the matter, however, is that even with DRASTIC homing in on Baric, Daszak and Wuhan from the left, with Fauci finally treed by BEAGLES, of all things, and the rest of us bearing down on them from the right and center, they keep pushing on. They are NOT going to stop.

Variants have now died down due to the mechanics of immunity, largely due to refusal of so many people to take the immunosuppressing phony vaccines. But THAT can be worked around. Don’t think that variants are gone. They’re TOO DAMNED USEFUL.

So how do you get MORE of them, without a ChiCom release operation, to convince all the CHUMPS in science, who will swear on their various manuals and codexes that it’s all real?

Just give a CURE that makes sure there are MORE variants.

Remdesivir doesn’t WORK well enough. It makes money, because ALL modern operations have to make their own money, but it doesn’t promote mutation fast enough. Nor is it administered during the viral maximum, when maximum mutation is possible.

Enter molnupiravir.

Move variants needed? Sure! And in time for their NEXT political operation, a.k.a. the 2022 election!

The way this scam of vaccines and drugs works is really smart.

The narrow vaccines NARROW humanity’s pool of immunity coverage of the spike protein, while decreasing overall immunity, both broad-based immunity to COVID and to other diseases. Meanwhile, the drugs WIDEN the shotgun pattern of the spike to find new variants that evade the vaccines.

This is such an incredibly slick grift, I almost have to applaud it. BRAVO! Satan himself has to be IMPRESSED. New diseases hidden in cures for old ones. And all of it helping to achieve the socialist goal of transforming mankind PER SE.

Before this is over, as they begin to move the increasingly narrow coverage genetically, even the original Wuhan strain will become a “variant of concern” for vaxxies! Ah, what a beautiful SCAM. The irony!

Note that this explains why HCQ and ivermectin cannot be used. They dead-end the scam. One has to have something that completes the “scam cycle” of increasing the problem while pretending to fix it.

This is their modus operandi. They find something that looks like solving a problem, that actually perpetuates the problem, or creates a new and similar one.

Just like “pursue gain of function to prevent gain of function” – which scam was revealed by Judy Mikovits.

If you find Democrats like Fauci anywhere NEAR one of these cyclic grifts, you know you’ve identified a scam correctly.

You have found something communist.

And now you break it.

W

LINK: https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/the-extraordinary-hypocrisy-of-molnupiravir

OAN Hosts Amazing Anonymous Documentary on Discovery and Suppression of Ivermectin for COVID, and How Gilead and Fauci Gamed a Remdesivir Study

My dear wife is the one who found this, so let me start off by thanking her.

After working outside Tuesday night, I came in the front door, and my wife IMMEDIATELY told me to start watching what was on OAN. It was an anonymous Rumble video about ivermectin and remdesivir that OAN re-bannered and broadcast, after being unable to identify or contact the author.

I’m very glad OAN decided to promote this video.

I caught only part of the ivermectin story, but ALL of the remdesivir story, and THAT was enough to get me searching for an online copy of the video for all of the readers here.

You can watch the OAN-rebannered video at the following link. (The original video is below.)

LINK: https://www.oann.com/the-story-of-ivermectin-sheds-light-on-the-history-benefits-of-the-drug/

Here is the text version for those that need it.

‘The Story Of Ivermectin’ Sheds Light On The History & Benefits Of The Drug

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 12:30 PM PT – Wednesday, October 13, 2021

Despite doctor testimonials, clinical trials and international studies showing the efficacy of Ivermectin, mainstream media continues to suppress information regarding the drug as a treatment for COVID-19.

One America News would like to shed light on the history and the benefits of Ivermectin by showing a video recently posted to Rumble by a user called ‘Temporarily Grounded.’

While we could not make contact with the user, we urge our viewers to email via our contact page at oann.com if you have any information on the video’s creator, including his name and direct contact information.

Fortunately, the original video is still on Rumble.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vlpecw-the-story-of-ivermectin.html

VIDEO:

This video basically shows the solid background of ivermectin, including some truly excellent and unbiased scientific information. However, about halfway through, it switches gears, and talks about the suppression of ivermectin.

The latter quickly segues into the promotion of remdesivir – and THAT is where it’s really, really powerful.

Who, you might ask, is behind remdesivir?

It’s SHOCKING – it’s not who you would expect – and you NEED to watch.

Beyond that, the documentary explains exactly how the bias for remdesivir was built into the trials – and that, too, is shocking.

I have been trying to warn people just how FAKE science is right now. This documentary backs me up BIG TIME. Thus, very glad to share it now.

W

Since Fauci and Pfizer Must Have Known the Jab Reduces Immunity, Was This Also Fauci’s Goal With an AIDS Vaccine?

Fauci and Pfizer have painted themselves into a bit of a corner.

I now believe that they “played a charade” on boosters – that boosters were their intent all along.

I think this WHOLE scam was very intentional.

But it gets far, far worse. I think I see that they have an agenda much bigger than the COVID scam.

And I think I see what that agenda is.

This is very hard to see, but I think that maybe some other people are going to be able to see it, so I’m throwing this out there in hope that those people MIGHT see this.

Let’s go progressively backwards in time.

The LATEST outrage is the Project Veritas revelation – in the words of Pfizer’s own scientists – which really shows you how utterly AMORAL or even IMMORAL the management of Pfizer really is.

Please watch this if you have not already.

H/T Sundance, Deplorable Patriot, and many others.

Discussion on CTH is HERE: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/04/project-veritas-undercover-highlights-three-pfizer-scientists-basically-our-organization-is-run-on-covid-money-now/

Discussion on TQT is HERE: https://www.theqtree.com/2021/10/05/dear-kag-20211005-open-thread/

The big point that you need to get out of this, is that the management of Pfizer is NOT interested in doing the best thing for people. EVERYTHING that you have seen from them – the hiding of the vaccine migration data – the ripping off of countries – the manipulation of FDA against competitor J+J – it’s all confirmed by what Pfizer’s own scientists say.

And to top that all off, these scientists ADMIT what we all knew, and always knew – that natural disease-conferred immunity is SUPERIOR to vaccine immunity.

Likewise, if anybody around here has been as SHOCKED as I am, about how badly ISRAEL is now treating EVERYBODY – Jews, Arabs, whatever – with their draconian mandates and “Vaczi” passports – well, maybe it’s not so much of a surprise.

What a bunch of play-acting. THE DRAMA – IT BURNS.

The HYPOCRISY is meant to DISTRACT from the MESSAGE OF COMPLIANCE that SELLS PRODUCT.

Do you see how the propaganda works here? They think we’re stupid. No. We’re just as wise as the MAGA husband who comes home and finds the wife ISRAEL in bed with A DRUG REP.

OY VEY.

But it gets worse.

This earlier video, which has also been discussed both here and at CTH, has a VERY important point that takes a while to sink in.

Again, please watch this if you have not already.

Or maybe not.

[ NOTE – YouTube video REMOVED – old URL: https://youtu.be/ZwR7natWqLk ]

Let’s try a different video service…..

LINK: https://odysee.com/@kristall.klar:2/My-Jaw-DROPPED-When-I-Tested-Someone%27s-Immune-System-After-2nd-Jab-:3

Alternate URLS:

LINK 1: https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/my-jaw-dropped-when-i-tested-someone-039-s-immune-system-after-the-2nd-jab_FxiOPtHr1sdslhZ.html/list/tYGRHuBjOq4edJy

LINK 2: https://tv.gab.com/channel/barkingmad/view/my-jaw-dropped-when-i-tested-61596d59b1df67548e7e7a60

LINK 3: https://www.infowars.com/posts/my-jaw-dropped-blood-tests-before-after-covid-jab-prove-shot-obliterates-immune-system-doctor-claims/

LINK 4: https://ugetube.com/watch/my-jaw-dropped-when-i-tested-someone-039-s-immune-system-after-the-2nd-jab_s9UrIFZgMJIqBs7.html

The biggest point is the final one, which the good doctor starts setting up at 10:00, and which he really gets down to at about 11:00 – that the COVID vaccines are actually SETTING UP BREAKTHROUGH INFECTIONS.

Yes.

I want you to read that again.

It appears that the jabs are making people MORE susceptible to the evolving virus.

This makes TONS of sense from an evolutionary perspective – which is why I have to laugh at all my liberal non-scientist friends who hate God, SWEAR that they believe in evolution, but would never believe what I’m about to tell you.

As you know from my prior discussion of viral evolution…..

No New Bioweapon Under The Sun

OK – we’re going to have some fun here – but stick with me, and you could learn A LOT. Cue the music! Borrowed from Wheatie! Previous posts helped put both the SPIKE PROTEIN DISEASE and the SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE into deep perspective. We were seeing that the SOLUTION was a significant part of the …

…..one of the best ways to look at a virus and one or more hosts, is to see how they all negotiate to a state of equilibrium, which then appears (because it IS) evidence of DESIGN. The design is just at a near-mathematical level – like a program that adapts and installs itself – rather than a cruder model that requires ridiculous microscopic interventions at every possible juncture.

Things work out for the benefit of LIFE, because we live in a PRO-LIFE universe. But the question is exactly HOW that works out. It may not be as SIMPLE in some ways as you think it might be – or conversely it may be SIMPLER.

We’re only humans, and we have a lot to learn.

And we could learn a LOT from space-time distributed, parallel-processed intelligence, a.k.a. LIFE.

Just like all our latest vaccine tech is bad mimicry of natural technology invented at least 70 million years ago (read the article – it’s fascinating), so our latest attempts to immunize ourselves are not even that.

These vaccines, which use our “next tech” but not our “best tech”, are corrupted by human GREED and DUPLICITY. Bluntly, Fauci, Pfizer and Moderna SCAMMED President Trump. They had a terrible motivation to push LITERAL “bleeding edge” vaccines, instead of more obvious and safer vaccines. That motivation was not to solve their phony crisis – it was to usher in gene therapies by using the same technology as a kind of false hero in a pandemic, riding on Trump’s coattails.

They needed “real science” to SHUT THE FUCK UP, while their FAKE SCIENCE cured their FAKE PANDEMIC with a FAKE HERO.

Likewise, the FAKE HERO remdesivir was trotted out – a nasty, elderly-murdering mistake.

Dr. Nathan Thompson, in the video above, discovered that the vaccines are – at least in some fraction of people – LOWERING general immunity – and this appears from all data to be to everything EXCEPT a single VIRAL VARIANT which is about to SHIFT to a NEW VARIANT. And we now know that even THAT limited immunity wanes rather quickly.

But we knew that. We knew that ALL ALONG.

Go back in time, before Fauci LIED and said that everything we knew was wrong.

We KNEW that you don’t make vaccines to colds – and that you barely make them to the flu. We knew that coronaviruses were problematic. We knew that vaccines to them are plagued with failure, in some cases caused by phenomena like ENHANCEMENT, where the vaccines make catching the disease EASIER or WORSE.

We knew what these viruses are like. We knew what they were like DECADES AGO. And yet, the disgusting MEDIA played us into a state of credulity, where even expert scientists with the most basic and well-grounded knowledge from over a century of virology were not allowed to state the obvious, if it contradicted our rotten, lying CDC.

Something is VERY wrong there.

Stop and think about it.

They are pushing a vaccine that reduces immunity to everything EXCEPT the VERY specific thing they vaccinated you for – which disappears. So the net effect is to make things worse in all possible ways.

Reducing overall immunity is exactly what Trump WARNED US ABOUT.

The cure can’t be worse than the disease.

BUT IT IS.

And I am going to argue that they knew this ALL ALONG.

Take a look at these screen shots.

If you have ANY kind of modern primary care physician, then you get these reports at least once a year, from the lab tests that your doctor orders.

RIGHT? Am I right?

You can actually compare THESE EXACT NUMBERS – not the CD4 and CD8 cells, which are specialized, and you probably don’t get tested for, unless you have AIDS or another immunosuppressive disease – but everything else will show up on YOUR lab results. Sometimes they say “Granulocytes” and sometimes they say “Neutrophils”, etc., but you can look at the “normal” ranges and match things up very nicely.

You can compare YOUR immune results with the ones in the video. But that’s not my point.

YOU KNOW PFIZER WAS DOING – OR COULD EASILY HAVE DONE – BASIC LABS ON THEIR TEST SUBJECTS.

They had to do the basics – right? Maybe not the people in the trials that everybody was watching – maybe they “overlooked the basic tests” very “accidentally” or by some rule – but somewhere, somehow – there is no way that Pfizer didn’t run the most BASIC immune function tests – THAT WE ALL GET – on at least some test subjects – and discover exactly what we are discovering now.

They had to know what was happening, and what this meant.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

If you have a virus, largely created by your friend in NIH, named Fauci, and his friends Baric and Daszak, and their friend Shi in China, and you have a vaccine for it that ONLY CREATES VERY SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES that your friend Fauci focuses on like a hypnotist, but otherwise the vaccines lower immunity and cause disease in general, and this virus changes itself quickly enough that boosters are continuously needed, or maybe only to the point where the vaccine harms immunity enough that the virus doesn’t HAVE to change……

Are you seeing what is happening here?

THE GENERAL LOWERING OF IMMUNITY IS KEY.

This is what counteracts ANY “good” that Fauci focuses on.

These vaccines are the ultimate damned heroin.

COVID vaccines are not heroic. They’re HEROIN.

Let me explain this again, in comparison to NATURAL IMMUNITY.

Natural immunity is the result of EVOLUTION – so it’s SMART. It knows from adaptive experience that a RIFLE SHOT at what just hit you will do no good – but a BLAST from a SHOTGUN will hit the bug the NEXT TIME IT COMES BACK DIFFERENT.

That is why the broad-based but complex immunity conferred by the DISEASE is BETTER than “just a few antibodies specific to yesterday’s villain.”

Nature KNOWS BETTER (by now) than to try to hit the shape-shifter where it was last standing.

Fauci doesn’t know better.

OR DOES HE?

I think he DOES know better.

And I think that Rand Paul, who is VERY SMART, is scaring Fauci because Fauci knows Rand is onto him.

I am no longer thinking these people are stupid.

I think they are very smart.

I think they are RINGERS.

I think they’re up to something.

Making money to continue their program is part of it, but not ALL of it.

They have a goal – the goal is NOT for our benefit.

I believe that these things are components of their agenda.

  • lower human immunity to disease AND to genetic modification
  • implement gene therapy as a gateway to genetic modification of humans
  • increase government’s power to complete medical control of humans
  • change humanity in a Fabian way – create some socialist human ideal

And THAT takes me back to something Cthulhu said, which has stuck with me.

This is NOT Fauci’s first rodeo.

Anthony Fauci: 40 Years of Lies From AZT to Remdesivir

Fauci was up to something VERY similar with AIDS. He wanted a vaccine desperately. He didn’t want to treat AIDS, but eventually he HAD TO – and when he finally did, it was remdesivir all over again.

And what I’ve come to realize, is that IF there had been a “working” vaccine for HIV / AIDS that worked anything like these terrible coronavirus vaccines, that vaccine would have LOWERED HUMAN IMMUNITY in the same dubious strategy – as the “prevention” for a disease that lowers immunity.

Do you see how WRONG and WEIRD that is?

You know – something is just “not right” with all this.

I’m not taking this vaccine. And I sure as hell hope YOU aren’t taking it either.

W

NIH and Gilead Blamecasting Remdesivir Renal Toxicity to an Excipient

Well, they can lock us out of The Q Tree, but they can’t stop the truth from getting out.

Enjoy a post first over on The U Tree and now HERE.

Here is a quickie in my WAR ON REMDESIVIR.

Fellow Treeper barkerjim dropped an interesting document today, from back in July, which showed the NIH mentioning black sheep IVERMECTIN on the same page as REMDESIVIR.

LINK: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/tables/table-2e/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/VNwhF

Such a beautiful misdirection. These guys are MAGICIANS.

This is a perfect example of my postulate that fighting FOR ivermectin will not yield results for restoring real science as fast as fighting AGAINST remdesivir.

In fact, I would go so far as to say that the enemy realized that getting us to fight FOR the saving drug would keep us from expending our energy fighting AGAINST the murdering drug that kills us off and gives them money for doing it.

You may recall my previous posts about remdesivir.

Remdesivir Is How We Bring Down The Temple of Faucism

The Murder of Veronica Wolski by Fauci and Gilead’s Zyklon D

My next piece was going to be an expansion on Karl Denninger’s recent post which places remdesivir/ivermectin and remdesivir/hydroxychloroquine in the context of Anthony Fauci and the disturbingly similar case when he was “all about AIDS” – namely, AZT/bactrim.

LINK: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243640

YES. As Cthulhu has said before, “This is not Fauci’s first rodeo.”

Before there were hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as innocent victims – good Samaritans accused falsely before the world – there was BACTRIM.

And there was FAUCI on all of them. AZT played the murderous part of remdesivir long before we forgot that “miracle drug”.

However, this new information from barkerjim’s drop right here needs to get out right away. The Q Tree site was brought down YET AGAIN as I started working on this, and again when I resumed, so I know it’s critical stuff. The ChiComs have a huge investment – both financial and military 4GW – in the American-killing drug remdesivir. They WILL protect it.

We know from doctors and scientists quoted in my first two articles, that remdesivir has a horrible track record – shocking, really – of renal toxicity. Studies of the drug against Ebola were TERMINATED because it was killing people in the hospital.

How déjà vu.

But here it comes again.

I read the same study results that the above celebratory announcement was made over. Those results were nothing to cheer about, with shot kidneys just the horrifying icing on the death cake. In my opinion, the results were far WORSE than any prior results for hydroxychloroquine. The results – to me – made HCQ look EXCELLENT in comparison.

Yes – by controlling what is acceptable science and what is not, Fauci was able to force the world to field a BAD, DANGEROUS DRUG that made money for Gilead, over a safe, mildly (but critically) effective drug, that made money only for the generics industry, and a French company.

And to top it off, Fauci USED Trump, who could do absolutely nothing about it, to take a KILLER drug into market as the ONLY way to treat his little pandemic.

So let’s take a look at that page dropped by barkerjim. I have captured it as SIX IMAGES.

Again, the link: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/tables/table-2e/

As you can see by our comments on The U Tree, most people will look at this table and think they are seeing positive and reasonable behavior by NIH. Adverse events are being discussed, and it appears that things are “even-handed” between different drugs.

And that is EXACTLY the style in which EVIL ABOUNDS IN WASHINGTON, DC (or Atlanta). Good and evil are forced into compromises where GOOD LOSES and EVIL WINS – but the result is called “meeting in the middle”.

CLOSER INSPECTION of the table gives you this, under Adverse Events for remdesivir.

  • Nausea
  • ALT and AST elevations
  • Hypersensitivity
  • Increases in prothrombin time
  • Drug vehicle is SBECD, which has been associated with renal and liver toxicity. SBECD accumulation may occur in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment.
  • Each 100 mg vial of RDV lyophilized powder contains 3 g of SBECD, and each 100 mg/20 mL vial of RDV solution contains 6 g of SBECD.
  • Clinicians may consider preferentially using the lyophilized powder formulation (which contains less SBECD) in patients with renal impairment.

This is some of the most remarkable “medical misinformation” I’ve ever seen. It’s truly a work of art.

NIH has HIDDEN – completely hidden – the pronounced renal toxicity of remdesivir. They have hidden it COMPLETELY. It’s GONE. What you are seeing there – the talk about renal and liver toxicity – is a BLAME-SHIFT to a substance that is used WIDELY in intravenous formulations, called sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin, or SBECD for short.

This substance is an EXCIPIENT.

An excipient is a substance that is used to MIX with a drug, and take that drug into a form where it can be ADMINISTERED easily. Thus, an excipient may DISSOLVE the drug, or help to dissolve it, into a liquid form. It may help POWDER the drug, so that it can be pressed into tablets or filled into capsules.

Excipients are often considered “inactive ingredients”, even though – YES – they very much can change the effective amount of a drug that the patient gets.

If I had to describe SBECD as something, it would be as a DETERGENT FOR DRUGS. It’s a kind of SOAP made from a cyclodextrin, instead of from some kind of fat or lipid.

And what is a cyclodextrin?

Cyclodextrins are rings of sugar molecules that falls somewhere in between being a smaller chain sugar (like sucrose) and a starch. Cyclodextrins have lots of uses, because they form tubes that act like waffle cones for other molecules. Febreze uses cyclodextrins to trap molecules which have unpleasant odors, at the same time that they release more pleasant ones. A genius application, quite frankly.

Thus, if you make a SOAP that has a little waffle cone for drugs, you can EASILY get drugs to dissolve into a concentrated liquid form by using that soap.

See those sidechains hanging off the cyclodextrin ring? Those are the “SBE” part of SBECD. They are typical of DETERGENTS.

This SBECD stuff and things like it are VERY useful for delivery of drugs. AND they’re relatively safe, too. They are rapidly excreted through the kidneys. Yeah, you don’t want a SOAP piling up in your blood if your kidneys are not working, and THAT is the fact that is being TWISTED by NIH when they say:

Drug vehicle is SBECD, which has been associated with renal and liver toxicity. SBECD accumulation may occur in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment.

Did you catch that sleight of hand? I’m gonna show it to you.

What exactly is causing the renal problems in the FIRST PLACE that you MAY have to be careful about, so that you don’t build up the excipient FOR IT, which MAY constitute a FURTHER risk?

REMDESIVIR.

It’s a crafty little lie. If you have good kidneys, you don’t have anything to worry about with this SBECD crap. But if you have bad kidneys, the LEAST of your problems is SBECD buildup. It’s the remdesivir IN the SBECD that’s gonna kill you.

Weakened kidneys do NOT need to be hit with remdesivir.

Which doesn’t even work ANYWAY. Except to keep people LONGER in the hospital.

Now what you SHOULD be getting, when they administer remdesivir, at the point where the VIRUS is basically gone, and you’re dealing with spike protein damage, cytokine storm, and all that nasty crap, are antiinflammatory, antithrombotic, and immunomodulatory drugs. Even HCQ (a known antirheumatic) at reasonable doses had some antiinflammatory effect in late-stage hospitalized COVID cases, although steroids and other things work better.

When the virus is basically gone, and a bunch of its CRAP is left behind, there is no point administering a toxic antiviral like remdesivir, other than to send money to Gilead Pharmaceuticals and their Deep State friends.

Now, let me stop here and validate this stuff.

HERE is a link that explains how SBECD can be filtered out of blood ANYWAY if a patient has renal impairment.

LINK: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338618/

Do you see what that means? SBECD is a nothingburger. It’s a DEFLECTION.

The renal problems of remdesivir are never mentioned, by quickly bringing up the risks of the excipient due to the unmentioned damage BY remdesivir.

What NIH did here was to quickly point their finger at THE OTHER GUY and said “HE DID IT!”

This is pure politicized science, where the politics is to defend the drugs and vaccines that enable the shared profits of both the Deep State and the companies that NIH, CDC, and NIAID are in bed with.

Let’s go back to that link I just gave you. THIS part of the conclusions comports very nicely with the reality of SBECD as a widely used excipient.

The finding that SBECD can be effectively removed by CVVH is clinically important, because some cyclodextrins have been associated with hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity due to vacuolation [3]. Although our study was small, no evidence to suggest SBECD as a cause of hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity was demonstrated in our study patients. This finding is consistent with other SBECD safety studies in humans [3,18]. Additionally, animal studies have only been able to demonstrate cyclodextrin toxicities when dosages more than 50-fold greater (3,000 mg/kg) than those used in humans were administered [3,19,20]. Unlike other cyclodextrins used in these animal studies, SBECD undergoes only minimal tubular reabsorption and limits concentrations within the intracellular tissues of the kidney, potentially reducing the risk of nephrotoxicity. Nevertheless, the FDA labeling for voriconazole recommends that IV therapy be avoided, if possible, in patients with a CrCl <50 ml/min [5]. Our data suggest that IV voriconazole can be safely administered in this population if the patient is concurrently undergoing CVVH.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338618/

But if you don’t believe THAT study, try THIS ONE.

LINK: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29578585/

Clinical Trial J Clin Pharmacol

2018 Jun; 58(6):814-822. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1077.  Epub 2018 Mar 26.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Sulfobutylether-β-Cyclodextrin in Patients With Varying Degrees of Renal Impairment

Randall K Hoover 1, Harry Alcorn Jr 2, Laura Lawrence 3, Susan K Paulson 4, Megan Quintas 3, David R Luke 3, Sue K Cammarata 3Affiliations expand

Free PMC article

Abstract

Delafloxacin, a fluoroquinolone, has activity against Gram-positive organisms including methicillin-resistant S aureus and fluoroquinolone-susceptible and -resistant Gram-negative organisms. The intravenous formulation of delafloxacin contains the excipient sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin (SBECD), which is eliminated by renal filtration. This study examined the pharmacokinetics and safety of SBECD after single intravenous (IV) infusions in subjects with renal impairment. The study was an open-label, parallel-group, crossover study in subjects with normal renal function or mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, and those with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis. Subjects received 300 mg delafloxacin IV or placebo IV, containing 2400 mg SBECD, in 2 periods separated by ≥14-day washouts. SBECD total clearance decreased with decreasing renal function, with a corresponding increase in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞ ). After IV delafloxacin 300 mg administration, SBECD mean total clearance was 6.28 and 1.24 L/h, mean AUC0-∞ was 387 and 2130 h·μg/mL, and mean renal clearance was 5.36 and 1.14 L/h in normal and severe renal subjects, respectively. Similar values were obtained after IV placebo administration. In subjects with end-stage renal disease, delafloxacin 300 mg IV produced mean SBECD AUC0-48 values of 2715 and 7861 h·μg/mL when dosed before and after hemodialysis, respectively. Total SBECD clearance exhibited linear relationships to estimated glomerular filtration rate and creatinine clearance. Single doses of IV delafloxacin 300 mg and IV placebo were well tolerated in all groups. In conclusion, decreasing renal function causes reduced SBECD clearance and increased exposures, but SBECD continues to exhibit a good safety and tolerability profile in IV formulations.

Keywords: Delafloxacin; Hemodialysis; Pharmacokinetics; Renal Dysfunction; Sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin.

I’m going to repeat that.

“In conclusion, decreasing renal function causes reduced SBECD clearance and increased exposures, but SBECD continues to exhibit a good safety and tolerability profile in IV formulations.“

Now, the above is not the only “New York Times” style trick that NIH plays here.

Let me list, without going into long-winded explanations, my additional favorites.

  • The table authors note that clinical drug-drug interaction studies have not been done, but nonetheless, they say “CQ or HCQ may decrease the antiviral activity of RDV; coadministration of these drugs is not recommended.1” – with a hanging reference.
  • For three OTHER potential drug interactions, communications from Gilead are cited as sufficiently exonerating. One is a non-competing generic steroid (dexamethasone) and the other two are patented big pharma antivirals from corporate “frenemy” Genentech. The interaction and “C-level mind-melding” between these two companies is very interesting. Look who just went from one to the other. Interesting times.
  • Some crafty shade is thrown at ivermectin by citing a possible adverse event risk and then retracting it, lawyer-style: “Neurological AEs have been reported when IVM has been used to treat parasitic diseases, but it is not clear whether these AEs were caused by IVM or the underlying conditions.” Meanwhile, the DEMONSTRATED risks of remdesivir are not even mentioned.

Bottom line – NIH is protecting Gilead on the toxicity of remdesivir, and they used FAKE NEWS tricks to do it. I keep telling people – science journalism is bad, and science governance is WORSE. It’s been CHINATIZED and OBAMATIZED.

And we’re going to UNDO THAT.

W

The Murder of Veronica Wolski by Fauci and Gilead’s Zyklon D

There will be justice for Veronica Wolski, because we will DEMAND IT.

H/T Bill Beakman and https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/09/in-memory-of-veronica-wolsky/

And until there IS justice, we will drag the CRIMES of Anthony Fauci and Gilead “Pharmaceuticals” and their SLEAZY ASSOCIATES thorough the headlines, over and over, until people SPIT IN THEIR PATH as they walk down the streets.

So where do we begin?

Let’s take a brief look at ZYKLON D.

This is the molecule of remdesivir, a.k.a. Zyklon D (as in DEMOCRAT). This is the drug that is killing Americans – primarily “Deplorables”, in the hospital.

The shading of parts of the molecule is significant, and I’ll get to that in a future article. The shading is more significant in a NEW way, than it was in the original way.

If you remember NOTHING ELSE from this article, remember this.

Hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, and ivermectin TOGETHER over their entire histories have not killed as many people as remdesivir kills in a SINGLE DAY.

In fact, I’m sure it’s significantly less, but I leave the exact numbers as an exercise.

What’s really nasty there, is that OUR tax dollars are being used to PAY HOSPITALS to murder us with remdesivir. As long as hospitals use this WRONG drug at the WRONG TIME (which I will explain) to kill OLD TRUMP VOTERS, they get money from the federal government.

But if hospitals use the RIGHT drug at the RIGHT time, they don’t get the cash.

So what do HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATORS – who more and more are NOT DOCTORS – do? They do what you EXPECT them to do. They do NOT do the right thing for patients.

(H/T Gudthots and GAB)

This has been a part of the general phenomenon of the “lawyering of science”. Has it made science better?

I don’t think so.

It’s beyond evil, but hey – when you have a mafiosa in charge of not only the purse strings, but the “quiver”, these sorts of things happen.

Oh, we’ve covered this gal before.

Buffalo Jump: Mafia Princess Mysteries

Impeachahontas Now Wearing Two Diapers Nobody expected Chris Wray to play Mafia Nan’s queen of diapers face-up on January 6, but that is exactly what appears to have happened. The only question now is WHY. To quote a friend from a former life, “AYE-YI-YI!” OK – let me back up a bit. First, I want …

And then there’s the “medical mafia”.

Do you see Trump with his hands tied over there? He had to let that jackass on the left declare that a terrible drug recruited to MURDER old Republicans was “the new gold standard of care”, because the murderer is a member of “SES”, and can’t be fired. The medical mafioso can tell whatever lie he wants, and nobody can do anything about it.

Of course, maybe it IS the “GOLD STANDARD” for DEMOCRATS and HOSPITALS.

Yes, the EVIL in charge of this nation is fairly impressive. Moscow has NOTHING on Washington.

But back to the new “secret euthanasia drug”, remdesivir.

Thanks to bflyjesusgrl for posting this story:

Tom Renz: Hospitals are now becoming killing fields – Brighteon.TV – NaturalNews.com

I highly recommend this story as background for discussing remdesivir, because it’s a perfect example for talking about several points:

  • why remdesivir fails
  • why hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin would have worked
  • why ivermectin would have worked
  • why you must absolutely stay out of hospitals until they abandon remdesivir

You can read the article, listen to the video, or both.

Here is the video. This gets into the specifics of the killing of Veronica.

LINK: https://www.brighteon.com/edd81a22-9c8d-439c-9d9d-b525e5ea0e27

VIDEO:

Here is the article from Natural News:

Tom Renz: Hospitals are now becoming killing fields – Brighteon.TV

Friday, September 17, 2021

by: Nolan Barton

Tags: bad doctors, badhealth, badmedicine, Brighteon.tv, budesonide, budesonide protocol, budesonide treatment, coronavirus, COVID, covid-19, covid-19 hospitalization, COVID-19 infection, deaths, doctors, ethics committee, FDA, hospital homicide, Hospitals, medical murder, medical violence, pandemic, Pneumonia, Preventive Medicine, remdesivir, ventilator

Bypass censorship by sharing this link: https://www.afinalwarning.com/554023.html

New

Copy URL

6,620 VIEWS

Image: Tom Renz: Hospitals are now becoming killing fields – Brighteon.TV

(Natural News) Tom Renz accuses hospitals of taking advantage of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic to make more money while ignoring the actual needs and requests of their patients. He says hospitals across the U.S. “are now becoming killing fields.”

“When you go to a hospital, even if you don’t have COVID-19, you’d be construed that way,” says Renz during his program “Lawfare with Tom Renz” on Brighteon.TV. “They get hundreds of thousands of dollars for putting you on remdesivir, putting you on ventilator and letting you die. And if you don’t follow, they’ll just intimidate you and coerce you.”

His guest on the program, Nancy Ross, has experienced that firsthand. Ross has been given the power of attorney to act on behalf of Veronica Wolski, a known patriot from Chicago who recently died from COVID-19 at AMITA Health Resurrection Medical Center.

The Cook County Medical Examiner’s Office has confirmed Wolski’s death was due to pneumonia caused by a COVID-19 infection, with hypothyroidism as a contributing factor.

Hospital wants to put patient on ventilator

Ross says the hospital wanted to intubate Wolski and put her on ventilator, and the doctors kept telling that every time they see the patient. “They kept reminding her of that instead of talking about other possible treatment,” says Ross, referring to the ventilator. “I just couldn’t get it.” (Related: Overreliance on ventilators led to coronavirus deaths, study shows.)

According to Ross, Wolski had been asking the hospital to give her ivermectin but her requests had been repeatedly denied.

For the uninitiated, the only treatment for the disease approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) involves remdesivir. It is approved for use in adults and children at least 12 years old who weigh at least 88 pounds (40 kilograms).

Remdesivir is an antiviral medication that targets a range of viruses. It was originally developed over a decade ago to treat hepatitis C and a cold-like virus called respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Remdesivir is not an effective treatment for either disease, but it has shown promise against other viruses.

It works by interrupting the production of the virus. Coronaviruses have genomes made up of ribonucleic acid (RNA). Remdesivir interferes with one of the key enzymes the virus needs to replicate RNA, preventing the virus from multiplying.

However, up to 31 percent of patients who received remdesivir have developed multiple organ failure and/or acute kidney failure. “Remdesivir was pulled from clinical trials because it’s too dangerous. It’s just a disastrous drug,” says Renz.

Doctor admits 99 percent of intubated patients die

Renz also shares a message he has just received about a recording from a doctor admitting that 99 percent of the patients they intubate have ended up dying. “These are just bad treatments. They just kill people,” he says.

Many hospitals are also giving COVID-19 patients with midazolam, which is questionable at best as it depresses a person’s ability to breathe. It is most frequently used before surgeries or procedures to decrease anxiety, cause drowsiness, and help with anesthesia in patients who need tubes or machines to help them breathe.

Midazolam has an FDA black box warning, which notes that the medication has been associated with respiratory depression and arrest because it can slow or stop breathing.

Ross says they also requested to give Wolski the budesonide treatment, but the hospital instead gave the patient a generic brand, which is not the best thing to have under that circumstance.

Wife dodges ventilator, survives COVID-19 with budesonide treatment

A husband from Georgia has had a better success in forcing a hospital to give his wife the budesonide treatment.

The husband named Mick tells Clay Clark during “Thrive Time Show” on Brighteon.TV that his wife has made it out of the intensive care unit two days after getting the budesonide treatment and has been able to go home in a week.

Mick says his wife is in really bad shape after a week of battling symptoms of COVID-19.

“She’s 57, has a partially collapsed lung and has preexisting conditions. Her blood oxygen was 50 and her blood pressure was 100/50,” said Mick. The normal blood oxygen level is between 94 to 99 percent. Anything below 90 is considered to be low blood oxygen.

“I went on battle mode immediately. I thought ‘this is it,’” said Mick, fearing that his wife would be put on a ventilator in which very few patients had survived.

He reaches out to Dr. Richard Bartlett personally to seek advice about the budesonide protocol that the latter has been promoting since the early days of the pandemic. (Related: Pastor David Scarlett talks to Dr. Richard Bartlett about how COVID-19 is 100% treatable – Brighteon.TV.)

After talking with Bartlett, Mick sends the hospital a fax message asking to put his wife under the budesonide protocol – which is 1 milligram of budesonide every eight hours. He also sends a copy to the doctor treating his wife, as well as a lawyer.

Mick cites several studies and a magazine article about the budesonide protocol, but he thinks that what catches the hospital and the doctor’s attention is his threat of escalating the matter to the ethics committee if they don’t grant his request.

Budesonide reduces COVID-19 hospitalization

Researchers at the University of Oxford has found that early treatment of inhaled budesonide reduced the need for urgent care and hospitalization in people with COVID-19 by as much as 90 percent. The study has also found that inhaled budesonide given to patients with COVID-19 within seven days of symptoms reduces recovery time.

Participants allocated the budesonide inhaler has had a quicker resolution of fever, symptoms and fewer persistent symptoms after 28 days. The study has also demonstrated that there’s a reduction in persistent symptoms in those who received budesonide.

Doctors have prescribed budesonide for more than 20 years as preventive medicine for asthmatics. Bartlett has written a paper with case reports describing favorable outcomes for two of his patients with the regimen. A lab study in the U.S. has also shown that budesonide inhibited the ability of a coronavirus to replicate and inflame the airways.

[Back to Wolf]

If, after reading all that, you’re STILL not suspicious that maybe remdesivir is problematic, then please read my previous article.

Remdesivir Is How We Bring Down The Temple of Faucism

I have been a poor and rotten servant of the Lord during my too long and too miserable life. I have made innocent women cry. I have led others astray. I have turned away from those in need in their time of need, and I have lied to myself and to God about why I …

In the prior article, there is a VIDEO that explains how remdesivir WORSENS pneumonia by shutting down the kidneys. The people who killed Veronica with remdesivir are NOT telling you that. They are HIDING the fact that Veronica Wolski was KILLED BY REMDESIVIR, but the effects of kidney-failure-induced pulmonary edema LOOKS like bacterial pneumonia.

It LOOKS like the disease did it, but it’s really the DRUG. Fauci gets away with what he CAN get away with.

He’s not a doctor. He’s an administrator. As his CLASSMATES have said many times.

But let’s say that Veronica Wolski actually DID have real pneumonia – AGGRAVATED by remdesivir kidney shutdown. THAT is exactly why Didier Raoult used AZT along with hydroxychloroquine – as a rapid attack on ANY bacterial pneumonia that might develop. So AGAIN – had Veronica gotten the RIGHT DRUGS right away, she would not have died.

In fact, AZT plus even OTC antihistamines (which prevent pulmonary inflammation) will prevent death by COVID-19, as long as the patients DON’T get remdesivir.

LINK: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833340/

See the graphic at the end of this article.

In that previous article I did a very fast proof that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) works, demonstrated at a national and international statistical level (the “Lancetgate effect”), but I just glossed over Prof. Didier Raoult’s first communication on the efficacy of a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin (HCQ + AZT) to prevent DEATH by COVID-19.

Here is Raoult’s comment on the uncovering of the Lancetgate fraud. Note that Raoult’s work was never attacked directly (which would have been scientifically suicidal), other than to say that his sample size was “too small” (not in my opinion) when he first communicated his findings.

Hydroxychloroquine is NOT a standard antiviral like acyclovir, remdesivir, and most of the other “vir” drugs, which are all based on what can best be described as “ringer” nucleotides, nucleosides, and nucleic acid bases.

Here is acyclovir, which as a “fake nucleoside” is very easy to understand. You can see where the name comes from – it’s an “acyclic” version of guanosine, where part of the ribose ring has been REMOVED.

Now the part they say about “without affecting the normal cellular processes” is NOT actually true. There are plenty of papers on the side effects of acyclovir. Those side effects are not USUALLY all that bad, but they are VERY REAL because acyclovir DOES impact normal cellular processes.

There are VERY FEW drugs which impact ONLY the processes of viruses, cancers, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, trypanosomes, flukes, helminths, ticks, fleas, lice, and other parasites, and do NOT at all impact host (that means US) cellular processes.

In fact, it’s not easy to say WHICH processes are purely HOST processes, and which OTHER processes are parasite processes. Host processes turn into viral processes by their ABUSE, and one of the BEST ways to stop viruses, is to simply stop the HOST processes that help the virus, until IMMUNE PROCESSES have time to identify, target, and DEFEAT the virus.

Under these tactics, the larger organism can WIN by not giving the virus what it needs.

VIRAL DENIAL IS A VALID TACTIC.

I hope that’s clear. Targeting ANY host process which helps the virus, and doesn’t hurt the host too badly when sabotaged, is a VALID way to stop a virus and beat a disease.

Most antivirals work by disrupting viral GENETIC processes, by serving as bogus pieces in RNA or DNA construction. They are like styrofoam or rubber links that create weaknesses in steel chain.

It doesn’t really matter exactly WHEN and exactly WHERE the “vir” type antivirals cause things to fail. They are simply SABOTAGE LINKS in the nucleic acid chains that viral construction depends upon.

Here is remdesivir’s sabotage molecule:

ATP is adenosine triphosphate – a critical molecule for both genetic construction AND energy transfer.

Remdesivir leads to the construction of a FAKE version of ATP (called RDV-TP above) which has two points of sabotage. One is an added cyano group – the other is an altered ring structure that cannot hydrogen bond properly, because one nitrogen has been removed, and another has been relocated.

It’s too bad that remdesivir is so toxic, but that’s the sad reality of drug discovery. MOST potential drugs have a lot of side effects, and are not all that safe.

Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are not all that good as antivirals, in my opinion, BUT they have the GLORIOUS property of being VERY safe. That is part of why they’re considered essential medicines for their normal uses against LARGER parasites (trypanosomes, flukes, helminths, and mites).

BOTH of those drugs have good postulated NON-STANDARD mechanisms of antiviral action – meaning these drug molecules are not bogus genetic building blocks – they disrupt something else. There is some debate on exactly how these drugs work, but it doesn’t really matter, as long as they work.

There are reasonable explanations of how they may work, there is empirical evidence that they DO work, and they are known to be safe at effective doses.

These drugs are SAFE TO USE.

Now – this is where TIME comes into play.

The main problem with remdesivir is that it is used TOO LATE in the viral process. It SHOULD be administered early in the process, on an outpatient basis, like hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. The reason is fairly obvious. If you attack a virus after it has already multiplied, you can’t stop the damage it ALREADY DID.

REMDESIVIR BOMBS A VILLAGE OF SURVIVORS AFTER THE TALIBAN CAME AND LEFT.

Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, administered early, are like sending in a platoon of commandos right after the Taliban shows up.

Which strategy is going to give the most survivors?

This is a no-brainer. You don’t need a Ph.D. to see this. And yet, literally, THOUSANDS of American Ph.D.s cannot SAY this because they’re afraid of losing their jobs, their reputations, or their potential for advancement.

Thankfully, I’m retired, so I can speak the truth.

Now, as a scientist who GETS relative importances, I can see how to FIX remdesivir. I TOLD them how to fix remdesivir in spring of 2020. Let me explain this YET AGAIN.

I take note especially of the horrible record of side effects (especially total kidney failure requiring dialysis and transplant) of remdesivir in hospitalized patients – who get high doses of remdesivir because they have high levels of virus (or low POST-INFECTIVE levels, but again – the people behind remdesivir are not being logical if we take them at face value).

The fact of the matter is that remdesivir has to be given I.V. – it cannot be given orally. That is the EXCUSE for giving it so late.

But IF it was given earlier, remdesivir could be given in lower doses that would probably work just as well as HCQ or ivermectin.

That is all that is needed. Protect people from death. Less drug because less virus. Less side effects because less drug. And it’s not like a doctor’s office can’t administer a lower, safer, yet STILL intravenous dose of remdesivir on an outpatient basis. EARLY.

They never did this.

Why not?

Now, I believe it’s because curing people with remdesivir was NEVER the intent of the primary conspirators.

Profit, obviously, for many participants, is the “legitimate” motivation. But there is more.

Secret euthanasia of “useless eaters” with remdesivir WAS their intent. And that “authority” to inject people (either literally or practically) against their will requires a hospital setting. The hospital setting creates the EXPECTATION OF DEATH – and that is how they get away with it.

The people who COULD have changed things to administer remdesivir when it would have been safer did NOT, because they were either cowardly, brainwashed, politically impeded, monetarily motivated, or part of the actual conspiracy.

SO – bottom line – if you feel that you have to go to a hospital, DO NOT go unless you are assured that your doctor can treat you with drugs that YOUR DOCTOR wants to treat you with, including ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, budesonide, and antibody cocktails.

These are the things that ACTUALLY WORK. And are ACTUALLY SAFE.

W

Remdesivir Is How We Bring Down The Temple of Faucism

I have been a poor and rotten servant of the Lord during my too long and too miserable life. I have made innocent women cry. I have led others astray. I have turned away from those in need in their time of need, and I have lied to myself and to God about why I did it.

But if I can save ONE person from pharmaceutical genocide, then I pray that person or a family member will put in a good word for me, and perhaps this sorry carcass of a believer can be given one more chance.

With that said, I begin doing the only thing I have ever been ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN was of some value to my fellow humans.

I will use REMDESIVIR to knock out the artillery that is pounding the only drugs saving people from the China Virus – IVERMECTIN and HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE.

It’s THAT much of a no-brainer.

It’s just hidden behind the media’s and the Biden administration’s smoke and mirrors.

The early success from hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin (HCQ + AZT) was dead easy to see in Didier Raoult’s initial communication. I could not “unsee” that success. This is how I knew that Fauci was either incompetent or a liar. I’ve explained it many times, but not today. I’m going to save your brain cells for the KILLER SHOT.

We can skip all that crap, and just let me show you TWO GRAPHS that prove hydroxychloroquine actually works.

See that jump in deaths? The one that falls back to the baseline of the graph? That is where a FAKE PAPER known as “the Lancetgate paper”, attacking hydroxychloroquine with phony data, was published to stop the use of HCQ in several countries, including Switzerland. The problem is that the Swiss are not stupid, and when they saw that withholding HCQ increased deaths, they simply reversed course.

It shows up in the data like a sore thumb. I call it “the Lancetgate effect”.

If you’re more of a graph-reader, then you may get something out of the next one.

France is the top graph. There are a LOT more deaths. This is because a communist bureaucrat married to some top politician sneakily BANNED hydroxychloroquine right before the pandemic hit

Here you can see how the data in Switzerland immediately jumped up to French levels with the Lancetgate effect. The general decline in France you see in the middle was due to the work of Didier Raoult, whose work with HCQ+AZT was gaining prominence, slowly, from the South of France, in Marseilles, but whose efforts suffered a momentary but delayed setback from Lancetgate, visible late in the Swiss increase.

Isn’t it wonderful how graphs can reflect what’s actually happening in science? Even in POLITICIZED science. This is why keeping commie mitts off the data is so important.

This was just the beginning. More and more data showed that HCQ worked, not perfectly, by any means, but pretty well, especially if given early.

Even more importantly, when the data didn’t support HCQ, community examination of the work invariably showed that there was NASTY, TRICKY, BIASED SCIENCE by those running the studies.

That was the big shocker for me. Some of the things they did to undercut hydroxychloroquine were downright VICIOUS. Almost MURDER. Not even human. Just KILLING PEOPLE to stop the drug. They literally overdosed people on their last legs with HCQ (which is actually hard to do), to try to undermine the drug.

And THAT will prepare you for what you are about to see.

What you are about to see is almost unbelievable.

I want to thank fellow QTreeper jamcooker and her dear daughter for bringing this video about the HORRORS of remdesivir to my attention.

I was not aware that many people were either as knowledgeable or more knowledgeable than I was, about how HORRIBLE a drug remdesivir really is.

The trouble is, I was lazy. I kept TELLING people remdesivir was bad, but I never went so far as to make speeches, or put together a video, or do ANY of the things that a REAL hero would do.

Nope. I was a lazy piece of shit.

I didn’t even do a dedicated blog post – when I KNEW it was killing people. Sure, I mentioned it a few times, but I never really committed.

But hey – I can do a blog post now. It’s not that hard.

So let’s just take a look at this video, and then I’ll fill you in with even more.

All the stuff I should have told you earlier.

Here is the LINK, so that you can send the video to other people.

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/X6XlLtJVR6t3/

VIDEO:

thedrardisshow.com

All his talk about the kidney damage from remdesivir?

THAT is stuff that I knew. Let me explain that.

Remember THIS moment?

This was AFTER Fauci and the media went after HCQ, and after Trump for any mention of HCQ.

So when Fauci said remdesivir was the “gold standard of care”, I went and looked at the data.

The COMMENTS from other scientists said EXACTLY what I was seeing.

It was CRAP. There is NO WAY remdesivir was anywhere NEAR as good as HCQ. And HCQ wasn’t all THAT great. HCQ saved people from hospitalization and death, but it’s not like it cured the disease overnight.

I repeat. Remdesivir was CRAP. It was EMBARRASSING that Trump had to shill this stuff, just to keep our hopes up, because FAUCI was standing up for the INDUSTRY and NOT THE PEOPLE.

Some of why remdesivir wasn’t working, was because the drug was being administered too late, when there is very little virus to kill, and all the damage has been done. It’s like shooting a vary expensive GUN at the sound of a burglar’s car going over the horizon. It’s WORTHLESS.

But the data I saw was far worse than simply not working. As one commenter said, the only thing remdesivir seemed to be really good at, was making people need kidney transplants.

Trust me. HCQ at normal doses NEVER hurts people’s kidneys. Doesn’t even HURT ’em, much less destroy them.

Think about that.

THIS? The KIDNEY KILLER? Is the “GOLD STANDARD OF CARE”?

GIVE ME A BREAK.

No, it’s the OPPOSITE.

It was CLEAR to me at the time, that Fauci was a freaking LIAR.

And he USED TRUMP FOR COVER.

LINK: https://www.newsmax.com/politics/dr-anthony-fauci-gilead-remdesivir-covid-19/2020/04/29/id/965235/

Trump, Fauci Cheer Gilead’s Drug Results in Coronavirus Fight

Dr. Anthony Fauci makes remarks as President Donald Trump and Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards looks on

Dr. Anthony Fauci makes remarks as President Donald Trump and Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards looks on in the Oval Office on Wednesday. (Doug Mills/Getty Images)

By Newsmax Wires    |   Wednesday, 29 April 2020 12:53 PM

President Donald Trump hailed good news that a Gilead Sciences Inc. experimental antiviral drug might help fight the coronavirus, and infectious disease official Anthony Fauci said data shows it appears to help patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Fauci said the early results of a closely watched clinical trial offered “quite good news” regarding a potential therapy made by the biotechnology company Gilead Sciences Inc.

“The data shows that remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery,” Fauci said.

An experimental drug for the coronavirus has a proven benefit, according to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

“The data shows that remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery,” Fauci said.

(More)

See how they did that?

Now, I could dig up that link to the data I saw, and show you that data myself, but I’ve got something MUCH better.

Some real, independent doctors did a real study on remdesivir, and they DESTROYED the narrative.

This is the NAIL in the coffin of remdesivir.

You don’t believe that guy in the video? Believe this.

LINK: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2781959

Just listen to the conclusions of these researchers. Remdesivir is USELESS – except to make MONEY by keeping people in the hospital LONGER. I mean, getting a new kidney might take a little bit of time. Ya know?

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir treatment was not associated with improved survival but was associated with longer hospital stays. Routine use of remdesivir may be associated with increased use of hospital beds while not being associated with improvements in survival.

In any SANE world, they would not be administering this crap remdesivir ANY MORE to ANYONE.

It’s ESPECIALLY important to note that Fauci’s LIE about remdesivir diminishing time to recovery is DIRECTLY CONTRADICTED by the MAIN CONCLUSION of this study.

A study on veterans who did not DESERVE to be treated as they were by Tony Fauci.

Now – let’s end this on a PERSONAL note.

Remember that “overpass patriot lady” who they REFUSED to give ivermectin?

They KILLED HER with remdesivir.

And the only way that they can KILL old Trump supporters LEGALLY – while making MONEY on our dead bodies – is this way. Part of that is making sure we can’t get the alternatives.

BillMitchell

@mitchellvii

·

Ivermectin LITERALLY SAVED INDIA and Fauci says there is no proof it works. When India was having a massive Delta outbreak, the Media LOVED to talk about India, India, India.

But now that Ivermectin has WIPED OUT COVID in India, the Media doesn’t want to talk about India.

They ARE MURDERING AMERICANS for money.

3,570 likes
300 comments
2,144 reposts

Bill’s not wrong about that. There is a GREAT article on Gateway Pundit, about what happened in India with ivermectin. Their keystone province of Uttar Pradesh has been LIBERATED by ivermectin.

Look at the data in the article. The title on GP is a bit misleading – the disease isn’t GONE like smallpox, but DAMN – the numbers are IMPRESSIVE.

HUGE: Uttar Pradesh, India Announces State Is COVID-19 Free Proving the Effectiveness of “Deworming Drug” IVERMECTIN

September 15, 2021, 7:30am

by J H. 4500 Comments

LINK: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/huge-uttar-pradesh-india-announces-state-covid-19-free-proving-effectiveness-deworming-drug-ivermectin/

But can we stop this assault on ivermectin?

Now it’s time to be very realistic. They do NOT give up.

They BEAT hydroxychloroquine into the GROUND with the media.

They did it to hydroxychloroquine before – they’re doing it to ivermectin right now.

Here is an EXCELLENT summary of how Fauci KNEW that hydroxychloroquine worked, and all the while he pushed the murderous moneymaker remdesivir. Do click the link below. This has a GREAT summary of Lancetgate, and links to many relevant reviews of what happened.

LINK: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/never-forget-dr-tony-fauci-killed-millions-pushed-bogus-study-downplayed-hydroxychloriquine-use-emails-prove-knew-effectiveness/

BUT – here is the problem.

In MY opinion, we cannot stop these horrible monsters by simply defending the good but imperfect treatments.

In MY opinion, we need to SLICE OPEN REMDESIVIR and SPILL BLOOD INTO THE WATER to bring in the DEMOCRAT TRIAL ATTORNEYS.

And the SOONER we do this, and the SOONER we THREATEN HOSPITALS into giving the TRULY SAFER DRUGS – not because they want to, but to keep from hemorrhaging their profits, then the SOONER we end this madness.

The BEST DEFENSE is a REAL OFFENSE.

Make them PAY for KILLING SENIORS with REMDESIVIR.

W

They’re Nazis

H/T Sundance.

https://youtu.be/7ZapO8imfuA

LINK: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/09/11/the-ethics-of-forced-employment-vaccination-by-dr-julie-ponesse/

Sundance has some excellent thoughts on this. It’s worth checking them out.

This stuff is so clearly Germany in the 1930s, there is no way around it.

The bottom line is that we are on the right side.

Now – some more interesting information which confirms that – yes – they ARE Nazis.

The LITTLE LIES that people are forced to give en masse – check out what THIS NURSE says.

(Two hat tips – first to GA/FL for the short version, and to Sundance for the long version.)

SHORT VERSION:

LONG VERSION:

LONG VERSION LINK: https://rumble.com/vm936v-whistleblower-nurse-destroys-delta-narrative-vaccinated-patients-fill-hospt.html

CTH LINK: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/09/11/an-articulate-nurse-dealing-with-covid-hospitalization-gives-honest-insight-about-what-really-is-happening-alarming-secondary-confirmation-of-details-provided-and-cited/

It’s important to go to the CTH link to understand how the POLITICIZED MEDICINE is being pushed from the top down. This is EXACTLY what was done to push the Global Warming Hoax in science. SD has some additional evidence that confirms WHY doctors are backing off – because medical organizations are apparently under political pressure to control their memberships, and are THREATENING doctors.

NOW – it gets worse.

The nurse ABOVE states that half the staff in the hospitals REALIZE that the vaccines are doing the damage, and that people are then being diagnosed with “COVID” instead of vaccine injury, but that doctors don’t even want to hear about vaccination being associated with the symptoms.

We have seen this from the VERY beginning of the vaccines.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vdaicp-cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-inj.html

BACKUP: https://www.bitchute.com/video/cpQ7dnqu0Sos/

ARTICLE: https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-injections-speak-out/

I’ve discussed this before – I think this CNA was doing good, honest science, and realized that the “superspreader story” given for post-jab deaths was politically motivated BS.

SO – where does THIS go?

This fits in very nicely with something from KARL DENNINGER (H/T barkerjim for posting this crucial information).

LINK: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243546

The gist of this article, from Denninger’s viewpoint, is that a recent data release from the British Health Ministry is the beginning of PROOF that getting the vaccine is starting to make the recipients MORE susceptible to the virus.

AND I QUOTE:

I told you a few weeks ago I was seeing very disturbing data that strongly suggested the jabs were, in some form or fashion, destroying existing immunity or otherwise potentiating more-severe disease.  I didn’t have the hard data to quantify it, but I’ve mentioned the drift in the data streams for some time now.  It was clear and convincing, but not quantifiable.  Until now.

I didn’t then (and still don’t) know the mechanism; I don’t have billions of dollars of lab laying around I can play with.  But on the data it was happening; it was not conclusive but the evidence shift was clear in the data pattern; what had been protection from being harmed if you were jabbed was trending toward neutral in the aggregate and anecdotes suggested harm.

Well, now we have it, and yeah, it’s harm.

Note the right two columns.  They adjust for per-100,000, which is the only accurate way to do it — you must adjust raw rates for the population prevalence of the specific condition under test.

This data shows conclusively that for anyone between 40 and 79 being vaccinated makes it more-likely for you to get Covid-19.

That means what you think it does: If you took the jabs you are the plague rat; you are more-likely to get (and thus transmit) the disease than an unvaccinated person.

Britain had studiously avoided publishing the ranged data like this in their updates until now.  I don’t know why they did it this time but it doesn’t matter.  Their data continues to claim that the jabs are effective in preventing hospitalization and death but the exact opposite is true when it comes to getting Covid-19 which means those who are vaccinated may acquire personal protection but in doing so become Angels of Death to others.

If you have trouble with numerical tables here it is in bar charts:

[ MORE AT THE LINK ]

[ Back to Wolf ]

NOW – Gail pointed out some things, and I think our discussion is worth repeating simply for that.

BUT – yes, there is more.

Gail and some of our other Q Treepers have pointed out earlier that the “Faucists” have pulled a fast one on everybody by labeling all people who “get COVID” within 14 days of getting vaccinated as having been “unvaccinated”.

There are a thousand reasons why this is BS, but the most important one is that it can be used to HIDE vaccine adverse events which happen to look almost exactly like COVID because – lo and behold – they are BOTH using the same damn toxic spike protein.

Well, one of the things I noticed was that this disastrously wrong policy – this FRAUD-PROMOTING policy – can also be used to FLIP the relative safety of being vaccinated VERSUS being unvaccinated. In essence, the VACCINE INJURED and the VACCINE FAILED (because immunity was too slow, if it’s reallly COVID and not vaccine injury) are both shoved into “unvaccinated”, which REVERSES BLAME, and in essence “blames the victim” instead of the vaccine – and we know that blaming the victim is a communist specialty.

So, with that in mind, here is our discussion from yesterday:

barkerjim

barkerjim Offline Wolverine September 11, 2021 12:58

Scary!

I Hate Being Right in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

10 Reply

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Online Admin Coyote Reply to  barkerjim September 11, 2021 13:59

This is critical stuff.

DO NOT GET THE JAB.

11 Reply

Gail Combs

Gail Combs Online Reply to  Wolf Moon September 11, 2021 16:07

ABRIVIATED LOOK AT CHARTS (I hope I copied correctly)

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1016465/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_36.pdf

Page 14
Table 4: COVID-19 cases by vaccination status between week 32 & week 35 2021
………………………………………….…(Rate per 100,000)…(Rate per 100,000)
AGE…..TOTAL …Not Vax….2 doses……Rec’d 2 doses …….Not Vax
>18…..167,832…141,676……….757……………476.0…………1,192.9
18-29…176,392…..53,187.…32,533……………711.1….………1520.8
30-39…113,373…..33,986.…43,004……………782.2…………1,143.9
40-49…97,881……15,106….67,349…………1,116.2……….……880.4
50-59…84,488……..7,552….67,652……………962.0……………729.7
60-69…45,252……..2,650….38,119……………672.3……………487.5
70-79…25,499……..…910….22,270……………480.5………….…367.5
80+…12,011……….…545….10,087………….…391.1………….…427.4

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Page 16:
Death within 60 days of first positive test….. Rate per 100,000
………………………………………….…(Rate per 100,000)…(Rate per 100,000)
AGE…..TOTAL …Not Vax….2 doses……Rec’d 2 doses …….Not Vax
>18…..3…………………3…………0……………..0.0 ………………0.0
18-29..24……………….15……..…4……….…….0.1 ……….………0.4
30-39…58…………….…39………12…………….0.2…………..……1.3
40-49…119…………..…67………35………….…0.6…………..……3.9
50-59…234……………122…..….90………….…1.3………………11.8
60-69…401……………146…….227………….…4.0………………26.9
70-79…653……………141…….486……………10.5………………56.9
80+…1,266……………165…..1,052……………40.8………….…129.45 Reply

Gail Combs

Gail Combs Online Reply to  Gail Combs September 11, 2021 16:16

This is the earlier article:

Well, Duh. This Is Why It Was Stupid

2 Reply

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Online Admin Coyote Reply to  Gail Combs September 11, 2021 18:11

OK – look at page 15 – the deaths within 28 days of vaccination VS unvaccinated.

Looks favorable to the vaccine – RIGHT?

This is how they gamed things, in order to FLIP the relative values of the last two columns, AND to hide vaccine deaths. So what they do is they count all deaths within 14 days of the vaccination as being due to being UNVACCINATED.

That not only HIDES the vaccine deaths – it flips the values of the 28 day report.

IMO if you have fine-grained data on deaths before scheduled (as a baseline) and AFTER vaccination, what you will see is that there is a characteristic COVID-mimetic death bell-ish curve AFTER vaccination which shows deaths CAUSED by vaccination. All those deaths need to be shifted out of the “non-vaccinated” column into a third column – DEATHS BY VACCINE.

7 Reply

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Online Admin Coyote Reply to  Wolf Moon September 11, 2021 18:13

This is a SMOOTH fake science operation, where media and science media pressure prevents scientists from talking about VACCINE DEATHS.

5 Reply

Gail Combs

Gail Combs Online Reply to  Wolf Moon September 11, 2021 21:30

A real life example of HOE TO LIE WITH STATISTICS!

1 Reply

cthulhu

cthulhu Online Reply to  Gail Combs September 11, 2021 23:35

Step 1 — HOE checks validity of STATISTICS’ bankroll.

Step 2 — HOE lies with STATISTICS….

0 Reply

Concerned Virginian

Concerned Virginian Offline Wolverine Reply to  barkerjim September 11, 2021 15:17

The article and the comments are brutal.

7 Reply

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR.

Another hat tip to GA/FL – she came up with some startling information – link HERE – that CDC is now pulling the same trick, as when they are hiding days 1 through 14, by LIKEWISE calling people UNVACCINATED if it has been over 90 days since their last jab.

The hiding of days 1-14 made sense mostly for hiding vaccine injuries, as well as the slow and migratory pharmacokinetics of the vaccine, and early vaccine failure to immunize. But cutting off at 90 days is the same thing for hiding ADE and failure against variants.

Hopefully, we get as aggressive on their “90 day scam” as we were on their “14 day scam”.

Here is our discussion:

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Online Admin Coyote Reply to  GA/FL September 11, 2021 19:12

Georgia – am I reading that correctly – about the 90 DAY part – that they are basically “unvaccinating the vaccinated” at THREE MONTHS after their last injection?

THAT is HUGE – because that basically keeps most people being classified as unvaccinated.

That is UTTERLY FRAUDULENT, and is being used to HIDE VACCINE FAILURE.

6 Reply

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Online Admin Coyote Reply to  Wolf Moon September 11, 2021 19:13

In theory, the only way to stay “vaccinated” is to get FOUR PER YEAR.

That will have a HUGE impact on human fertility.

5 Reply

Concerned Virginian

Concerned Virginian Offline Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon September 11, 2021 19:16

Wolf Moon
AND it will be a MUCH faster way to decimate / destroy the body’s natural immune system.

6 Reply

Concerned Virginian

Concerned Virginian Offline Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon September 11, 2021 19:15

Wolf Moon
And that would ALSO be a “convenient” way to DENY the fact that the “vaccines” compromise the recipient’s immune system, making the person MORE vulnerable in real terms to COVID / any of the “variants.”
Cases in point: My son and DIL, both MD’s, both “fully vaccinated” in FEBRUARY of this year, both coming down with “breakthrough cases” of COVID in AUGUST.

Last edited 9 hours ago by Concerned Virginian

8 Reply

It is really becoming apparent that they will cover up using any method, or tell any science lie, to give us these bad vaccines. This kind of pig-headed determination that KILLS people is clearly Soviet, Maoist or Nazi – take your pick.

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR.

A final note, going back to the anonymous whistleblower nurse.

She talks about patients – isolated from family and friends in the lockdown COVID ward – getting REMDESIVIR – a drug which is GUARANTEED to be more useless than any “horse dewormer”.

This is the drug that Fauci the LIAR announced under Trump, and called the new “gold standard of care”.

Oh, Fauci was having fun there.

You see, he was TAUNTING US.

When he said “gold standard”, he was talking about MAKING A LOT OF MONEY – and I would further stipulate they planned to do it with a “goldbrick” drug.

At the time Fauci announced it, we were able to see the study. That study results were actually revealed a day or two before that, and on the news, the stock market reacted badly, because THEY could see what I saw, when I looked at the results.

WORSE than hydroxychloroquine. WORSE than ivermectin. And substantially so. I mean, it was CYNICAL to even suggest that this was an “OK” drug, much less a “gold standard”, when it was WORSE than the results for drugs that THEY said don’t work.

And worse yet, the patients getting remdesivir CLEARLY suffered kidney damage, including going on DIALYSIS. This was all BACKWARDS from reality.

This was not merely my reading of the results. LATER STUDIES confirmed this.

LINK: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2781959

The doctors in this article almost ACCUSE the makers of remdesivir of shaking down patients and insurance, it’s so obvious that the stuff does not work, except to make money.

COZY, this little arrangement. Not necessarily for the People.

That Chinese organization called “WHO” has actually taken notice, and like a stopped clock, is correct in no longer recommending remdesivir.

And suddenly, I remembered something.

Cthulhu had talked about Fauci seeking an AIDS vaccine FIRST, and then going to the toxic drug AZT, which was in itself a plague and a scandal.

Well, we’re seeing BOTH of those scandals again – a vaccine AND a drug for a retrovirus (AGAIN – people are not talking about the ESSENTIAL Jaenisch paper.)

And it’s the SAME GUY.

But NOW, with his former young protege running CDC.

Something is not right here. It’s not just the vaccines, and it’s not just the drugs. AND LOGIC may have a whole bunch of things for Suspicious Cat.

W