mRNA Vaccines that Breach the Nucleus and Change the Genome – What are the Chances?

Ask yourself a simple question. Why should the very first examples of mRNA vaccines for humans violate the most important safety standard of the mRNA platform? Why would the vaccines do exactly what they PROMISED US the vaccines would not do?

TL;DR –

They didn’t just lie to us about the spike mRNA not going into the nucleus and not changing human DNA – the whole purpose was very likely to do exactly what they did – to open the cell nucleus and keep it open, so that we as a species can start changing population genomics in a huge way, using a variety of technologies.

The central dogma of molecular biology. They shilled the blue arrows to the masses as lies about safety, while hiding the special red arrow and actually working to open it up for business.

Show-Time (Introduction)

I have finally realized that I need to spell out, in as many ways as needed, what is really going on with SARS-CoV-2 and these derived mRNA vaccines.

I had hoped that people would see the implications of the science which is now open to us, with the publication of first the Jaenish paper, then the De Marinis paper, and finally the Mehedi paper. I have commented extensively on each one of these papers, including very recently on the Mehedi paper, which really makes things obvious. I had thought that somebody more notable than me would try to make the point I am about to make. Sadly, nobody has, so it looks like I’m going to have to do it.

These vaccines are designed to BEGIN to change us on a fundamental level which is not exactly the same as the “transhumanism” that constitutes most of the “clickbait” against the vaccines. It’s similar, but it’s not the same. What we see in the clickbait is a distraction from the actual danger, which is not strange and distant and unbelievable, but is in fact right here, and right now, and very believable, once you understand it.

The truth is a lot more like GATTACA, and a lot less like Transcendence.

It’s already starting, and the infrastructure is being set up. The first step has actually been accomplished, and it was in many ways a HUGE success.

Humans ARE being engineered right in front of our eyes. I hope that you can see this point by the end of this article.

They (meaning WEF and its backers) hacked the human cell nucleus on a population genome level. They created a “Trojan” virus that appears to have “zero-dayed” the human cell nucleus. Artfully, the hack is a lot like state-level “APT” (advanced persistent threat) computer hacks, in that it gets in and holds the door open. Of course, better models can be created, but the self-replicating crowbar for the cell nucleus has obviously arrived, and its imperial version of SPQR is PRRARSV.

THAT is the fundamental advance that was achieved here.

I have to say, it was ingenious and “admirable”, in several senses – scientific, military, and criminal. Of course, your mileage may vary on “admirable”. Many will consider it “diabolical”.

What we are facing is the immediate REAL danger of biological engineering and eugenics, which was employed in a fantasy way, as a technical MacGuffin, in various episodes and productions in the Star Trek universe.

This is a scene from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. These two people are “superhumans” who (according to the story) proved to be disastrous for Earth, during our current century (more or less). The one on the right is “Khan” – obviously in homage to Genghis Khan and his relatives, who ruled much of Asia for centuries.

Don’t get lost in the fantasy stuff. THAT is not the big danger. Stick around for an explanation of the reality which is actually upon us.

Here is how Wikipedia describes Khan, but more importantly, where he CAME FROM.

Khan Noonien Singh is a fictional character in the Star Trek science fiction franchise, who first appeared as the main antagonist in the Star Trek: The Original Series episode “Space Seed” (1967), and was portrayed by Ricardo Montalbán, who reprised his role in the 1982 film Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. In the 2013 film Star Trek Into Darkness, he is portrayed by Benedict Cumberbatch.

Khan had controlled more than a quarter of the Earth during the Eugenics Wars of the 1990s.^[1] After being revived from suspended animation in 2267 by the crew of the Starship Enterprise, Khan attempts to capture the starship but is thwarted by James T. Kirk and exiled to Ceti Alpha V, where he has the chance to create a new society with his people. In Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, set fifteen years after “Space Seed”, Khan escapes his exile and sets out to exact revenge upon Kirk.

In Star Trek Into Darkness, set in the alternate continuity established in Star Trek (2009), Khan is awakened almost a decade before the events of “Space Seed“. Khan is given the false identity John Harrison and coerced by Admiral Marcus into building weapons for Section 31 and Starfleet in exchange for the lives of Khan’s crew. He ultimately rebels and comes into conflict with the crew of Enterprise.

OK – so what are the “Eugenics Wars”?

Back to Wikipedia…..

When the original series of Star Trek was produced, the 1990s were several decades away, and so various elements of the backstory to Star Trek are set in that era, particularly the Eugenics Wars. The references to the Eugenics Wars and to a nuclear war in the 21st century are somewhat contradictory.

The episode “Space Seed” establishes the Eugenics Wars, and has them lasting from 1992 to 1996. The Eugenics Wars are described as a global conflict in which the progeny of a human genetic engineering project, most notably Khan Noonien Singh, established themselves as supermen and attempted world domination. Spock calls them “the last of your so-called World Wars”, and McCoy identifies this with the Eugenics Wars.

OK – don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying it’s EXACTLY like Star Trek, although I do subscribe to the folk notion that Star Trek is a VERY good predictor of things that are likely to happen.

What I AM saying is that genetic engineering of humanity has already started, and now I’m going to explain why this is so.

We will take a brief tour into the PAST, before we return to the future. If a light bulb comes on, keep it lit!

**You cannot uninvent the genetic Tommy-gun, nor the gun moll who knows how to code.**

Bonnie & Clyde of the Nucleus

BANKS make a really great analogy of the cell nucleus.

they’re common and everywhere
they contain valuable stuff that needs to be protected yet dispersed
they have high security
things need to traffic securely in and out of them

Breaking into a bank with very high security is a lot like what the spike protein does. But the spike protein doesn’t do it alone. THAT is an important point from the three papers I keep mentioning. The spike protein has a PARTNER who has all the plans.

OK – just for the record – this is going to deviate a little bit from the ACTUAL story of Bonnie and Clyde. Just warning you – it will get weird.

The spike protein and the spike protein mRNA are a PAIR, and together, they are able to not only break into the bank, but to totally take it over, and keep it taken over. And then to take over more banks.

Here is how it works.

The spike protein is Clyde. He’s got a gun, and he causes all kinds of trouble with it. He’s the “action” guy. He knows how to break into banks, mostly because he has a phony ID that always gets him in. The phony ID says PRRARSV in big letters on it, which makes all the bank guards at Cell Nucleus Bank and Trust say “Why, welcome, Mr. Barrow! We’re pleased to see you at the bank today! Come right on in!”

Or, to use a different analogy…..

These bank guards are such chumps, but it works every time.

Well, here is the problem for the bank. When Clyde goes in, he always brings his partner Bonnie. And SHE is trouble. She’s not so good with a gun or a fake ID, but she is a real scam artist, who knows how to get into the bank and embezzle the hell out of it.

Bonnie gets into the cell nucleus bank, and with some help from Clyde, she gets a permanent job there. Bonnie and Clyde are set for life. None of this “grab the cash, run out, get caught, and die in a hail of bullets” shit. No sir! THIS Bonnie and Clyde are smart.

Bonnie trains many of the new girls at the bank – and like the pod people in “Invasion of the Body Snatchers”, she turns every last one of them into exact copies of HERSELF. NASTY! So all these fresh Bonnies are trained by the bank and sent out to get into new banks.

But wait! Bonnie can’t get into banks. Bonnie doesn’t have a gun or a fake ID! How can she get into more banks?

Easy! Bonnie and all her Bonnie clones have the power of multiplication – not just to make more copies of each one herself, but to make more Clydes. Bonnie makes more copies of herself while she’s IN the bank, and she makes copies of Clyde while she’s OUT of the bank.

So every Bonnie that leaves the bank, creates hundreds of new Clydes on the outside. The next time Bonnie wanders near a bank, there are bound to be dozens of Clydes just hanging around, ready to escort her, and maybe even other gals [important], into the bank. If no Bonnie is already working there, she gets a job, and the process starts over.

The KEY POINT is that BONNIE makes the CLYDES who can get her, or women like her, into the next bank.

Bonnie can’t get into the bank, and Clyde can’t get a job in the bank, but together, they can make a living by embezzling banks.

Side Note: This is a beautiful example of a contradiction in the Marxist sense. Proteins and nucleic acids can’t do certain things alone, and thus NEED EACH OTHER.

Once Bonnie is on the payroll, this fact introduces a permanent security problem in the bank, and for all other banks.

And why is that?

Once Bonnie is on the payroll, you can’t get rid of her.

She will just create more Bonnies and more Clydes, and they will scam more banks.

In terms of banks, banks can resist just Clyde or just Bonnie, but they can’t resist the pair.

In terms of the cell nucleus, it can resist the spike protein or the spike mRNA, but it cannot resist both of them together.

Which pair, oddly, is exactly what the vaccines create.

WHAT ARE THE CHANCES?

We can use other analogies, using banks, which emphasize the spike protein more.

Imagine a bank that was convinced to crank out KEYS TO THE BANK, and to send out these keys. Imagine thousands of keys to the bank being sent out by the bank into the community, perhaps in a really stupid PR stunt.

God knows WHO is going to get into the bank now.

God knows WHAT is going to get into the genome now.

Are you starting to see what they did?

Fact Checking the Fact Checkers on DNA Change

The absolute best way for me to convince you that they really said these vaccines could not do what they are now proven to be doing, is to simply play back the words of the “fact checkers”.

See if you can spot how many LIES are told in this video.

If you’re not spotting the lies, read THIS ARTICLE.

AND – by the way – this video is a GREAT explanation of the way things NORMALLY work. It’s totally out to lunch on the way things ACTUALLY work.

Did you spot the lies? Tell me what you found in the comments.

This video is not alone – there are HUNDREDS OF THEM.

There are also hundreds if not thousands of articles of a similar nature. I’m just going to pick one of them – the one that happened to have the graphic I used above. That article is dated from MARCH of 2021 – right when the authorities were hard-selling the “vaccines”.

mRNA Covid-19 vaccines: Facts vs Fiction

MARCH 10, 2021

By: Maria Elisa Almeida Goes
Editing: Offspring Magazine Editorial Team
Images: Nina Lautenschläger.

LINK: https://www.phdnet.mpg.de/offspring/Covid-19_vaccines

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/irZec

Interestingly, this archive was made only 5 months ago. It was very likely archived by Wikipedia or somebody else who is shilling the false explanation, when faced with the emerging science showing nuclear translocation and genomic incorporation. But it’s perfect for me to preserve evidence.

As an aside, I find it terribly sad that this particular lover of “Max Planck” era scientific history, lived to see one of Planck’s namesake organizations lying about science on a grand scale, but yet here we are.

Let me just pull out the most relevant section. I was planning on highlighting ALL of the lies, fibs, evasions, etc., but there are so many, I decided to only highlight or [comment on] the most horrible and ironic.

mRNA vaccines will not alter your DNA, this is why:

Concerns about the effects mRNA vaccines over the integrity of our DNA also exist. Thankfully, you do not need to worry about this. Such an event would challenge everything scientists know about basic cell biology, and is so improbable, that one can actually call it impossible.

The main reason for that is that, besides being chemically and structurally different from DNA, mRNA is located in a different cellular compartment. While DNA is enclosed in the nucleus, mRNA is produced in the nucleus, but is quickly exported to the cytoplasm with a one-way ticket: it does not come back. In fact, only specific proteins carrying “nuclear localization signals” are able to migrate from the cytoplasm into the nucleus, and mRNA vaccines definitely do not include such molecular instruction. Thus, because mRNA cannot spontaneously be trafficked to the nucleus, it cannot modify your DNA sequence. Additionally, the RNA molecule is charged and carries the same charge as the nucleus, so as our 6th grade physics taught us, like charges repel, and hence the RNA molecule is physically repelled by the nucleus. [Note added by Wolf – WHAT THE HELL???]

One might also argue [HA! You TOADS! Yes, one “might”!] that there are mechanisms through which RNA can be integrated into the genome – HIV viruses being the classic example. The key differences here are that such viruses (1) express special enzymes which are able to code DNA back into RNA and (2) can associate with proteins that can traffic them into the nucleus. Neither scenario is applicable to the mRNA vaccines. [OH, THE IRONY]

For the same reasons, mRNA vaccines cannot affect your unborn children. This would require genomic mutations [oh, really!] in the reproductive cells – sperm and egg – since only these could potentially be transmitted to the next generation. [AND???!!!]

Speaking of children, you might have heard that Covid-19 vaccines would cause infertility in women [why don’t you just stop there, and not go on to one bad hypothesis?] because antibodies against the spike protein could mistakenly attack placenta cells, due to an alleged similarity with a placental protein called syncytin-1. There is no scientific evidence supporting this claim – and, in fact, the two proteins are barely similar, sharing only 4 sequential amino acids out of 538. [This did seem to be a bit of a miss. Nevertheless, what new hypothesis explains all the pregnancy problems?]

Still, you might want to ask why pregnant women are excluded from the vaccination campaigns [wait a minute….not in the US], and why, during clinical trials, women are asked to use contraceptive methods that will avoid pregnancy [because there might be a problem?]. Again, this is not a red flag. Any clinical trial for a potential vaccine or drug will exclude children, pregnant women, old people and people with specific underlying conditions. Initially, trials are designed to obtain major insights whether the developed pharmaceutical product works at all, in healthy adults. Once safety and efficacy are determined [read what you just said before that, where you excluded safety as a motive], tests are expanded to smaller groups that at first were set aside. Excluding pregnant women from trials only shows that trials are being done systematically and following standard protocols. [I’m sorry, but this sounds like happy horseshit, lady.]

Let’s concentrate on the lies most relevant to this discussion. I’ll isolate them and respond to each one.

In fact, only specific proteins carrying “nuclear localization signals” are able to migrate from the cytoplasm into the nucleus, and mRNA vaccines definitely do not include such molecular instruction.

This is EXACTLY what was found with the spike protein that was produced by the full spike mRNA. What a coincidence! See De Marinis for proof that it happens, and Mehedi for WHY. OH – because there’s a nuclear location signal! Was it a “known” one, and if so, who knew it and who didn’t? If some people knew, and others didn’t, wouldn’t that make it like a “zero day” on the nucleus?

Thus, because mRNA cannot spontaneously be trafficked to the nucleus, it cannot modify your DNA sequence.

OH! But isn’t that SO STRANGE that the Mehedi work shows that the spike protein LITERALLY “traffics” the spike protein mRNA into the nucleus? WELL AHHHHH’LLLLL BE! So maybe this explains the nuclear DNA modification that is seen in the De Marinis results. Yes? Maybe? Come on, girl – you’re a scientist at a prestigious institute. Put on your big girl pants and hypothesize with me! You can do it! This is undergraduate, “smart-alec guy in the back of introductory class raises his hand” stuff! And when you were in that class, you thought the same sorts of things but didn’t raise your hand. Maybe it’s time to be brave!

One might also argue that there are mechanisms through which RNA can be integrated into the genome – HIV viruses being the classic example.

This should have been your really big hint, girl. Our local accountant named cthulhu realized that Fauci’s HIV interests and his bat virus interests had remarkable similarities, both in what he himself did, and in what he was studying. “This isn’t Fauci’s first rodeo.” Ask yourself – why was Fauci interested in this? Could it have been the same reason that Doudna was so interested in CRISPR-Cas9? The desire for WRITE PERMISSIONS on the genome?

The key differences here are that such viruses (1) express special enzymes which are able to code DNA back into RNA and (2) can associate with proteins that can traffic them into the nucleus. Neither scenario is applicable to the mRNA vaccines.

Thank you, my lying lady. You have just provided me with a huge clue, by the process of “liar subtraction” – a form of deductive reasoning. We know from De Marinis that genomic incorporation and modification is a fact. We know from Mehedi that “nuclear trafficking” (your point 2) is a fact. This means that it is almost certain that the spike protein ALSO acts as a promoter of reverse transcription (your point 1). You said it – not me. That sure seems convenient, doesn’t it? My question is now – DID YOU KNOW THIS? Were you part of the plot? Or was the person who reminded you of these things part of the plot? Or were we all part of the plot, when I, too, mindlessly parroted the “central dogma” as a defense of mRNA vaccines?

I’m willing to confess that I was wrong. I will admit to my part in promoting the conspiracy. Will you?

But their defenses get worse.

There are now MSM “fact checks” which specifically try to walk back the implications of both the Jaenisch and De Marinis papers, and you can bet there will be similar fact checks on Mehedi’s paper. There has likewise been pressure on those authors to DOWNPLAY the significance of their own works. To me, this is the height of bullshit.

Jaenisch Paper Downplay

Fact Check-Controversial MIT study does not show that mRNA vaccines alter DNA

LINK: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-vaccines-idUSL1N2PK1DC

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/vJwBk

De Marinis Paper Downplay:

Swedish study on COVID vaccines and DNA misinterpreted

LINK: https://apnews.com/article/Fact-Check-COVID-Vaccine-Sweden-Study-986569377766

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/vJwBk

Rather than take these arguments apart myself, I ask you all to take a first crack at the different techniques used, by clicking the links and observing the UNETHICAL SKEPTICISM. Much of this does not require a science background.

In particular, knowing what we know now, after the Mehedi work, I think it should be very clear how much the media went to bat for the vaccines without honestly questioning the “authorities”.

I will confirm your findings in the comments, and catch any straggler sins of science.

To me, this media mendacity is all simple, stupid, and predictable.

“Nothing to see here!”

Frankly, it changes nothing for me, if any of these authors get talked into walking back their own work, because push-back on critical work is a common phenomenon in the history of science. Not all scientists are capable of weathering the storm. Here are TWO that did. Both got Nobel prizes, by the way.

A classic case, emphasizing a field aversion among an establishment group to a field solution emerging from deductive reasoning, was Van’t Hoff and tetrahedral carbon. Basically, a doctoral candidate in an applied science school had the temerity to take an old hypothesis and revive it as the solution to a very significant current problem. The guy was good – he went on to win a Nobel prize for other work. However, many chemists, especially older ones, rejected the idea, in my opinion by not prioritizing explanatory power over their own abstract philosophical preconceptions. The fact that important people rejected an elegant solution of remarkable utility and truth shows how bad group-think problems can be in science.

Another case was Rick Smalley and C60 (buckminsterfullerene). The linked article accurately describes the initial skepticism that people had for “soccer ball carbon” or “bucky balls”.

The Nature letter describing C60 was attractive and logical, but seeing a line in a mass spectrum did not convince all scientists of the discovery of a new allotrope of carbon. During the period 1985-1990, the Curl/Smalley team at Rice and Kroto at Sussex managed to amass a wide range of circumstantial evidence to support the fullerene structure proposal. Full acceptance came when Wolfgang Krätschmer of the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg, Germany, and Donald Huffman of the University of Arizona, with their students Konstantinos Fostiropoulos and Lowell Lamb, succeeded in synthesizing C60 in sufficient quantities to allow structural characterization.

I personally remember colleagues assuring me that Smalley was loony, demented, senile, past his prime, or at best something along the lines of “a nice guy, but clearly deluded and obsessed with an error.” The doubt about C60 as reality – particularly as a stable reality – ran thick. And that doubt was WRONG from the very beginning.

Scientists right now are NOT THINKING, and they’re letting the MEDIA push them around.

Scientists are also letting guys like Anthony FAUCI push them around, mainly by the horrible federal grant system, and by the psychology of woke universities, both designed to control science.

And that doesn’t even begin to address other malign interests altering science and medicine in dishonest ways.

Some Actual Speculation – Why Would They Push These Clearly Defective Shots So Hard?

You want some actual “conspiracy theorizing”? Here it is.

Let me go back to my “TLDR” again…..

They didn’t just lie to us about the spike mRNA not going into the nucleus and not changing human DNA – the whole purpose was very likely to do exactly what they did – to open the cell nucleus and keep it open, so that we as a species can start changing population genomics in a huge way, using a variety of technologies.

There are reasons to suspect depopulation as a motive for these vaccines, and both Gail Combs and I have written extensively about this. I continue to believe that this is part of the motivation of the “complex event” we have been undergoing, between virus and vaccine.

Depopulation is very important to these people.

MALTHUSIANS AND EUGENISTS MAKE A CASE FOR POPULATION CONTROL

DEPOPULATION – NEVER LET A CRISIS GO TO WASTE

The Population Control Shot – Introduction

The Population Control Shot – Understanding the Peoples Climate Temple

Likewise, there are many other motives, ranging from mercenary profits, to promoting gene therapy, to “Covid communism”, and beyond. Many of these roads lead back to WEF – the World Economic Forum. One of those roads may be an actual attempt to commit humanity to a future of genetic engineering as a kind of fait accompli.

Just listen to Yuval Noah Harari talk about changing humanity. A few times he talks about “we”, “I”, “me”, “my”, and “our” programs of genetic engineering of humanity. It’s not just creepy and megalomaniacal – it seems quite self-assured.

WEF’s interest in genetic transformation of humanity cannot be understated. You will note in the above video, the presence of Jennifer Doudna – the Nobel laureate who (IMO) was most responsible for pushing CRISPR gene editing technology forward. Here is the full video.

I have discussed the technology recently here:

Dear KMAG: 20230213 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Introduction to CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Technology

This is a particularly good explanation for those who want to dig into the science a little.

So how does CRISPR-Cas9 connect to the spike protein?

I have mentioned that the spike not only is proven to have nucleus-opening properties and cell nuclear mRNA-trafficking properties, but it likely has reverse-transcribing properties as well. Thus, it may have utility in facilitating certain varieties of genomic incorporation of genetic material beyond its own spike mRNA. I’m leaving that open very broadly. We don’t really know how far the “nuclear translocation of mRNA” capabilities of the spike protein actually go.

But even just the incorporation of its own instructions into the cellular genome, makes the spike protein highly relevant to CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology.

We can’t REALLY be sure what happens if the spike protein code gets into egg or sperm DNA, and goes on to be a “feature” of every human cell of a “spike baby”, but I can say one thing – if that gene can be REMOVED during in vitro fertilization (IVF) by CRISPR-Cas9 technology, to the betterment of the child, then it’s very likely going to be demanded by elite parents, to assure a healthy baby.

So – I ask again – WHAT ARE THE CHANCES?

What are the chances, that people who are gung-ho on the “solution” of genetic modification of humanity – you know – like WEF – would have anything to do with releasing a virus and promoting a vaccine that would almost FORCE us into that future?

I think that this era is a lot like the chemical revolution of the late 1800s, precisely when Van ‘t Hoff was dealing with chemical theory. Figures like Malone and Doudna operate in the time of our own biological revolution. Remember Rockefeller, and what he did to science and medicine back during the chemical revolution. Well, now we have Gates and what HE did to science and medicine during the biological revolution.

Personally, I think it’s high time for us to stop taking shit from the corporate media – and particularly the “fact checkers” like Reuters and the AP – as they LIE to our faces about science – as they deny reality on behalf of the corporate titans behind them.

These mRNA vaccines are DEFECTIVE relative to how they were sold to us – very likely by intention – and the media and media organizations have LIED to us about those vaccines in the most scurrilous ways. The media has defended LIES and defrauded all of us.

You don’t have to be FOR or AGAINST gene editing per se, to be against LYING, DEFRAUDING, and FORCING IT ON THE WORLD by a criminal conspiracy.

We need to demand TRUTH about the vaccines, or the SHUTTERING of these “media” companies and organizations, which have cosigned onto crimes against humanity.

Demand no less. TRUTH or BREAK-UP. Media that lies and conceals is USELESS and a hindrance to REAL SCIENCE.

W

Genomic DNA Incorporation of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Explained by Unique Hidden Key to Nucleus and Spike’s Surprising Ability to Transport mRNA

This is SO HUGE. I must explain this to you.

TL;DR – The spike protein not only contains a special sequence that allows it into the cell nucleus – it also has an ability to bring its own spike mRNA sequence with it. Both features appear to be unique among coronaviruses. The features explain genomic incorporation found for both the virus and the vaccines. The special key and the mRNA shepherding can be considered to be defects in any spike vaccine that has them.

¡Muy explosivo!

Due to comments by WSB and Valerie Curren, I realized that I had to do this post.

Also, NONE of the “bigs” are talking about this, but it is HUGE, if only people will read the paper.

By sheer luck, I was alerted to this new development ASAP on Twitter.

A follower of mine, who I had followed back, posted on Twitter the link to a paper with this title:

Nuclear translocation of spike mRNA and protein is a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2

I immediately realized what this was about.

It’s about how the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) virus spike protein and its mRNA get into the cell nucleus – an extremely important point which WSB has been hitting on over and over. It’s very important, because THAT is how “genomic incorporation” happens. And genomic incorporation is what HIV does – what retroviruses do. They “get into” the DNA and leave cookies, so to speak.

Sometimes, they leave enough cookies, that the whole virus comes back out, fully functional, and ready to infect. Sometimes, they only leave enough junk in the DNA to cause some damage. Sometimes, they leave enough to change us – and that is why human DNA is filled with “viral leftovers”.

In principle, mRNA technology should NOT do this. We were TOLD that mRNA technology could not do this. But somebody LIED TO US. And not only that – NOBODY – from Bill Gates on down – ever apologized to us about lying, or even about just “being mistaken”.

We’ll get to that later.

You will recall that there are two papers I love to mention.

One is the “Jaenisch paper”, which describes how the SARS-CoV-2 virus manages to get some of its genetic instructions for the spike protein into the DNA of cells.

LINK: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/XWC52

The other is the “De Marinis paper”, which describes how the Pfizer vaccine did the same thing to human liver cells in vitro – meaning that in an experiment using cells in culture, the Pfizer vaccine got its mRNA sequences into the DNA genetic material of human liver cells, and it did so in a matter of minutes.

McCullough got in a lot of trouble with Twitter for posting this, even though it was utterly true. Now we know that the government was trying to shut it down. They likely used the technicality of McCullough’s very VALID speculation (stated as speculation and concern), which turned out to be correct, IMSO.

LINK: https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73

LINK: https://portal.research.lu.se/en/publications/intracellular-reverse-transcription-of-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-m

These papers explain ALMOST everything. When I saw the Jaenisch paper, I predicted that we would see the De Marinis paper. MEANING – when I saw that the virus could get mRNA into the DNA, I predicted that the vaccine might get its mRNA into the DNA, too. And yes, I was right. Clearly others thought the same thing, and decided to investigate.

Now, after the De Marinis paper, it seemed very obvious to me that one did not need any kind of special conditions or reverse transcription promoters to get the vaccine mRNA to incorporate.

That bothered me, and I suspected, at the time, that MAYBE – just maybe – the spike protein ITSELF was somehow causing genomic incorporation – that it functioned as a kind of reverse transcription promoter.

Well, it sure looks like that is the case.

According to the discoveries revealed in the new paper, which I have taken to calling the “Mehedi paper”, there is a special sequence in the spike protein that acts like a “key to the nucleus” – and this sequence is found in NO other coronavirus spike protein.

LINK: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1073789/full

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/kW9Bd

Here is the abstract of the new paper.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes severe pathophysiology in vulnerable older populations and appears to be highly pathogenic and more transmissible than other coronaviruses. The spike (S) protein appears to be a major pathogenic factor that contributes to the unique pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2. Although the S protein is a surface transmembrane type 1 glycoprotein, it has been predicted to be translocated into the nucleus due to the novel nuclear localization signal (NLS) “PRRARSV,” which is absent from the S protein of other coronaviruses. Indeed, S proteins translocate into the nucleus in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. S mRNAs also translocate into the nucleus. S mRNA colocalizes with S protein, aiding the nuclear translocation of S mRNA. While nuclear translocation of nucleoprotein (N) has been shown in many coronaviruses, the nuclear translocation of both S mRNA and S protein reveals a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2.

Let me put that in plainer English.

COVID-19 really hurts old people and seems to be both deadlier and easier to catch than other coronaviruses. The spike protein seems to be why. Although the spike protein is a surface protein that normally would not do this, it might be predicted to get into the cell nucleus because it has a special sequence “PRRARSV,” a known key to the nucleus which appears in no other coronavirus. Sure enough, the COVID spike protein gets into the nucleus of infected cells. What’s more, the mRNA for COVID spike protein also gets into the nucleus. What happens is that the spike mRNA collects near the spike protein, which helps it get in. While a different protein called the “nucleoprotein” of many coronaviruses is known to get into the nucleus of cells, the penetration of the cell nucleus by BOTH the spike protein AND the mRNA for it, seems to be a unique new feature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Once you read it in plain English, it’s much more mind-blowing.

Now – I really recommend that you read the rest of the paper, but it’s really just technical details about what was mentioned in the abstract. Those details can help you gauge the expectedness or unexpectedness of things, but I have tried to do that as best as I could in the translation.

At this point, you should have all kinds of questions.

could this defect of the vaccines have been predicted?
should it have been predicted?
did the Chinese know this when they sent us the sequence?
did we know it when we got the sequence?
would NOT using the full spike protein have prevented this?
if so, why did we use the full spike protein anyway?
would the “forbidden” Winfried Stöcker RBD vaccine have avoided this?
if so, why was his vaccine suppressed by the German government?
does this affect the Peter Hotez vaccine, Corbevax?
if not, why didn’t his vaccine get promoted through the process quicker?
is nuclear penetration a common problem with mRNA technology?
how did this “key” get into the sequence? Naturally or not?
could “directed evolution” of the spike have yielded this?
why wasn’t this clear from the moment we got the sequence?
did people know this and hide the information?
were key people like Bill Gates (their side) and Robert Malone (our side) aware of this possibility?

The last question is a gift to WSB and her virologist friend. I am by default a defender of Dr. Malone, but WSB and her friend are long-time skeptics of the technology, and thus of Dr. Malone. In all fairness, I think we have to ask EVERYBODY the same questions.

Did people KNOW that mRNA technology had this vulnerability?
Does this look any more like an engineered bioweapon, designed to get into the nucleus?
Was this thing made by nature, by people, or by somebody with more advanced technology?
What is the purpose of getting into the nucleus, if it is designed to do that?

That should be enough. I will leave some links to prior comments I have made, in an appendix, hopefully added later.

Thank you.

W

John Fink and James Coburn discuss case in a scene from the film ‘The Carey Treatment’, 1972. (Photo by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Getty Images)

PS – A great interview of our site mascot!

https://thehollywoodinterview.blogspot.com/2008/02/james-coburn-hollywood-interview.html

Three Little Graphs That Say It’s All One Big Lie

TL;DR – This post explains three graphs which all gave me “AHA” moments when I saw them. They all reveal lies in public science, which are used to manipulate humanity. Strategic and fundamental lies in climate science and planetary history are used to justify more tactical lies in energy and medicine. Together, these three graphs indict the sabotaged and weaponized public science which is being used against humanity.

All of this conforms to a concise and remarkably prescient warning by President (and former General) Dwight D. Eisenhower.

While there is much deep science in each graph, certain basic principles are easily seen without a technical background. Those ideas provide the “wait a second” thought needed for proper scientific skepticism.

If you want to get the “executive tour” and finish this in under 5 minutes, just read through anything that says TL;DR in bold, and the images next to the headline text. If you have 30 minutes, watch the videos next to TL;DR. If you have an hour or two, read everything.

If you read THIS paragraph, then consider the slow route. Or consider doing the TL;DR fast track first, and then coming back for the full ride.

Mood Music

Introduction

I wanted to keep this short, but I know that’s almost impossible. I’ve put off this post until I was ready, but I wasn’t ready until I heard this music (see above), while reading over an older post that aged well in a variety of ways.

The Molnupiravir Contradiction

Why would we mass treat a virus with a drug which forces the virus to mutate, when mutation is how the virus creates new variants that reinfect the vaccinated? Before I explain the title contradiction, let me start with an admission. Most of my life, I have been very friendly with the pharmaceutical industry. I …

The point I saw was that mass formation psychosis has been used at all levels of science, and the only way for us to fix science now is

MASS FORMATION AWARENESS.

Be part of it. NOW.

Q = MFA

(The equation is a bit of a joke – but you are welcome to elaborate it humorously, fellow nerds.)

I had thought that maybe I was putting off this post until the last post was done, but the next post was always the last one, and I knew that I would always find just one more post to do first.

Nope. Now is the time. The last “Wheatie” post is in the can, strengthening my soul, and in hearing this song that I used for it, while knowing that we are on the right path, I’m suddenly ready.

There is a certain beautiful sadness in knowing that I’ve remained silent about even ONE lie for far too long. And now, with THREE beautiful lies – three FURIES against mankind – it’s time to take them all on.

More Mood Music

(A song literally about mass formation psychosis.)

It’s The Jabs

TL;DR – The Ethical Skeptic analyzed CDC data for causes of death in the US. By looking at deaths caused by blood and immune disorders, but not by COVID itself, vs. projections from pre-COVID data, two things show up – more “late” deaths related to COVID, and a MUCH BIGGER group of similar deaths that started precisely with the jabs.

You can see this in the graph as space between the two curves, widening first in Spring 2020 (twice), and much more in April 2021, coincident with the biggest deployment of the jabs.

I’m pretty sure Ethical Skeptic doesn’t believe in God, but that does nothing to keep me from saying “Thank God for Ethical Skeptic”. When Truth is an unyielding goal of individuals, they don’t need to agree on what Truth is, to create a world of good faith.

It was gil00 who brought me this tweet, wondering if it was important. I told her at the time that I needed to do a post on it, but that is just the beginning of its importance. Tradebait, Gail Combs, and the rest of the gang, also saw that this was a biggie.

The fact that it contains one of three graphs that “change everything”, should give you an idea of exactly how important I think it is.

ALL Americans need to understand this graph.

No – I take that back. All intelligent life within the sphere of influence of this planet and this moment need to understand this graph. THEY THE PEOPLE need to understand exactly who they’re dealing with.

Everything begins with the blood – and sequels from there… this is the other canary in the coal mine aside from rare cancers…

See if you can find an inflection point on this chart… pic.twitter.com/touV7yUJHz
— Ethical Skeptic (@EthicalSkeptic) August 30, 2022

Let’s blow that up a bit…..

Before telling you WHY, let me assure you that there are MANY more graphs like this, which will all say roughly the same thing – IF one is honest enough to let the data talk. I choose this graph because it’s probably the clearest and simplest that I’ve seen so far – due in large part to its creator, The Ethical Skeptic, or “TES” as I will refer to him now.

We have talked about TES’s work before, since he emerged as one of the most skillful and impossible-to-censor critics of what might be called “Fauci science”. I may quibble with minor points on his more far-reaching hypotheses and theories, but I always find that his general and bigger principles “age spectacularly well”, and are best taken very seriously at the earliest possible moment.

Again, hence the need for this post.

Here is what I said originally – it was my “initial reaction”. You don’t have to follow it too closely, unless you find it all obvious. I’m going to explain this in detail.

By looking just at blood and immune disorders, and comparing mortality of 2018-2019 (pre-COVID) as a baseline (which was then extended by seasonal extrapolation into 2020, 2021 and 2022, with normal population increase meaning a slight increase in deaths), and then looking at 2018-2022 actual for all years, using the actual figures, but removing COVID, one can see the population reduction effect of the jabs, as the excess cardio and immune mortality, which just keeps increasing with time.
It’s clear as a bell in the data, when one compares to the “expected deaths based on the last two years of pre-COVID times”.
The striking thing is how STRONGLY the sum which includes 2020 and 2021 deviates away from the prior years, starting exactly with the jabs.
2020 includes TESTING of jabs.
2021 includes DEPLOYMENT of jabs.
2022 includes BOOSTING of jabs.
It’s a depop shot. And it works. All they would have had to do is dial up the dose just enough, while normalizing the deaths with the media, and it’s totally tunable to the rate of depop that one desires.

OK – so what does all that mean?

Let’s take it slower.

First of all, at any time, you can go to theethicalskeptic.com and check out his article on this topic, which does not YET have THIS particular graph (except in the comments), but which will likely have said graph in the next two parts of the article.

Houston, We Have a Problem (Part 1 of 3)

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/08/20/houston-we-have-a-problem-part-1-of-3/

I also call your attention to this highlighted point made near the beginning of the article.

Nonetheless, by the end of 2021 it had become abundantly clear that US citizens were not just dying of Covid-19 to the excess, they were also now dying of something else, and at a rate which eventually became higher than that of Covid itself.
The Ethical Skeptic, Houston, We Have a Problem (Part 1 of 3)

If you just read that, where TES couches his words VERY carefully, and you know what he’s hinting at, then you know why I said this is one of the three big graphs you need to understand. He ain’t lyin’. My only quibble is that I suspect that his estimate of “decades” of damage to health policy may be conservative, and “centuries” is a horrifying possibility.

Are you ready to dig into the graph?

GOOD. Here we go.

Let’s start with some ACRONYMS.

NHCS = National Center for Health Statistics
MCD = MCoD = Multiple Cause of Death
UCoD = Underlying Cause of Death
ICD-10 = International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision
MMWR = Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
wk = week
M-Avg = moving average (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_average)
Dnm (n = 5-8, m = 0-9) = Death codes

This is enough to understand it fully.

The basic graph is DEATHS going up on the left, and TIME going across from left to right, over a period of YEARS.

The DEATHS on the left are showing from 350 per week (at the bottom left) to 950 per week (at the top left). That means that we are not seeing the 0-350 region, which is featureless and below the portion of the graph that we can see. It’s a legitimate suppression – it’s not hiding anything except relative magnitudes of the changes to a SMALL extent, and it helps us see the differences in those changes better. It’s a magnifier – just remember that it’s there.

The title says that this is US-NCHS data for Multiple Cause of Death, meaning it’s looking at all causes of death listed on death certificates in the US and then databased by the National Center for Health Statistics, which is part of the CDC. This database is then searchable online.

The title also says that this data is for SELECTED cause-of-death codes listed in the ICD-10 system. The data runs up to week 29 of 2022, and is adjusted for the lag in reporting to CDC at the end (see right-hand side).

Let’s jump briefly to the topic of those codes.

Using the drop-down buttons you can see in the image, TES has chosen death codes 50-89, but has excluded COVID-19. Those codes are briefly described as “diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs” (but excluding COVID-19). TES has also selected ALL ages.

In the lower left you can see several descriptions of that different groups of the D-codes mean. Generally speaking, these are related to blood, blood-forming organs, and some immune problems. We will quote from TES himself about these later.

This does NOT include cardiac arrests, strokes, and certain other “stereotypical” clot-shot diseases, but it DOES include more “obscure” diseases that we can intuitively expect would be affected by both COVID and the CLOT SHOT. Thus, it serves as a kind of sensitive test for “something bad in the blood”.

A critical point for understanding is in the subtitle below the title.

2020/21/22 Compared to Baseline 2018/19

What this means is that what we are really doing OVERALL is looking at the 3 years of data “from and after Wuhan COVID”, 2020-2022, and comparing those numbers to “before Wuhan COVID”, 2018-2019. This explains why there are TWO curves on the graph. But in order to do this VALIDLY, we have to PROJECT the numbers from 2018-2019 FORWARD into the next three years, since the baseline would automatically increase on its own. Thus, we have TWO CURVES that run for all 5 years.

It helps to look at the red dashed curve first. This is listed as 2018-2019 Baseline 5 week moving average. Don’t worry about the “moving average” stuff. What this does is to take a bunch of scattered points and smooths them into closer points that can be used to draw a curve through them. It’s a neat trick to create the “best curve through scattered points”.

You can see that this is a bumpy “sawtooth” curve, higher in the winter, lower in the summer, and slowly rising over time. Typically, over time, this is what you see. Every year can be predicted largely from one or more prior years. You just take the past, find all the patterns you can, and project them all into the future.

There is a related red note in the lower left corner of the graph that says “1.4% baseline growth rate”. This is the annual growth in the baseline numbers from 2018-2019. The numbers vary rather strongly from month to month, but not much year from year, meaning that it’s easy to predict what they SHOULD look like in future years, such as 2020, 2021, and 2022. Each year will look pretty much like the last, months and weeks will go up and down, but day to day it will be 1.4% higher than the previous year, following the patterns of previous years.

This idea works remarkably well.

OK – so what is the pink solid line? THAT is the ACTUAL NUMBERS, for all five years, from week to week, using a 7-week moving average, and reporting it as the LAST week of the seven weeks. This is where we’re going to find any interesting phenomena.

The use of a DIFFERENT number of weeks for the multi-week moving average serves as a kind of sanity check in the region where both curves derive from the same ACTUAL data (2018-2019). The curves will not be much different, and the differences are just an artifact of the methodology, but if you see a big difference in that region of the same actual data in both curves, it’s probably meaningful, and probably something WRONG in your processing of the data.

Any minor differences you DO see in the region of actual data vs. itself (2018-2019), serve as a nice comparison of SCALE to any systematic differences you see in the 2020-2022 region, which is the region of ACTUAL DATA (pink solid) versus PROJECTED DATA (red dashed).

For example, if TES has a similar graph for some code like automobile accidents or choking on food, you can confidently predict that ACTUAL data for 2020-2022 should match the curve for PROJECTED DATA from 2018-2019 fairly closely – apart from any unexpected societal effects of COVID such as lockdowns, but those would then appear rationally in the data.

SO WHAT DO WE SEE?

TL;DR – the actual deaths begin to exceed the projected deaths in stages, with a lesser jump happening due to COVID itself, but a far bigger jump (over 2.5 times as big) happening after people began taking the jabs in a big way in April of 2021.

Looking at the two curves with the innocence of a child, we see them separating in stages. We see them separate a certain amount (call it 1X) during spring and early summer of 2020 (call this region 1), then separating about twice as much (2-3X) during summer, fall and winter of 2020, and early spring of 2021 (region 2). Then, in late spring of 2021, the separation grows suddenly and substantially (7-10X) (region 3), and it just keeps growing into 2022 (15X+).

This is NOT an accident. TES knew that the vaccines began being given in a big way around week 14 of 2021 (early mid-April), as shown by this graph.

TL;DR – this additional graph shows how the slope (derivative) of total jab doses given is used to see when most of the jabs were administered. This is near the beginning of dosing, and explains the sudden rapid widening between the two curves in the primary graph. It’s a “pandemic of vaccination” much like COVID itself.

Based on this date, TES looked for ICD codes which show a dramatic WIDENING at “Critical Inflection 1” – meaning when the jabs were introduced (what I called the beginning of region 3), VERSUS any prior widening in spring of 2020, when COVID-19 of the Wuhan strain was introduced (what I called the beginning of “region 1”).

Stated differently, TES is only counting things which appeared dramatically MORE for the jabs, than they did for COVID itself.

Basically, TES is being “too fair” to the jabs. We know that there are many causes of death by both COVID and the JABS, “because spike protein”, but if it’s not overwhelmingly obvious IN THE DATA that they’re significantly and primarily due to the jabs, he’s not counting them.

He’s letting a bunch of jab deaths “get away”, to make sure that he’s indicting only real jab deaths.

As a side-note, this is what Gregg Phillips did with True The Vote’s geospatial data, by only counting the most blatant and obviously organized mule data (10 drop boxes and 5 stash houses). It becomes almost impossible to criticize the science, when data is winnowed down to exclude even the most marginally debatable data.

Deny the unethical skeptics even a foothold, and they cannot even begin to raise an unethical argument.

Pretty BOSS LEVEL if you ask me.

Here is what TES has to say about the ICD codes that he used.

With regard to these select ICD-10 codes, I have endeavored to highlight only those which have exhibited a stark difference between their arrival patterns during the 2020 pandemic period, and that period after MMWR Week 14 2021. While there are indeed increases in deaths incumbent inside the other ICD-10 codes, those increases appeared to plausibly conform to their same arrival patterns for 2020 as well. In other words, they appeared to be heavily Covid-related in their dynamics, both before and after the Week 14 2021 inflection.
Of particular concern, are those deaths which relate to body-wide regulatory systems as opposed to specific organs or causes. In other words, cancer and lymphomas, heart, autonomous myocarditis/pericarditis/conductive disorders, injuries to the liver and kidneys, etc. These are not only the canaries in the coal mine in terms of pathology, but may serve to indicate as well that a pervasive systemic disruption is at play inside the average US citizen human physiology, especially over the last 71 weeks. These are the death groups which exhibit the most stark trend of increase post MMWR Week 14 2021.

There have nevertheless been some attempts to “take down” TES’s analysis, but after two of them were burnt to a crisp on Twitter, it’s pretty clear that these attacks were not “ethical skepticism”, but in fact beautiful examples of what has happened to science in the wake of politicization and corruption. One academic was even outed by a sharp Twitter user as a practiced shill for the Faucism narrative, referred to humorously as “a regular on the fact-check circuit”.

NOW, knowing what the graph means – that the cure turned out to be worse than the disease (something which Trump said could not happen, thus forcing a coup to maintain the plot) – it is really worth it to go back and read TES’s article, if you have not already.

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/08/20/houston-we-have-a-problem-part-1-of-3/

It’s tough science, but even if you just “kinda get it”, it’s WORTH IT.

It is important to read the comments at the end, too. Not only does TES have links to his Twitter defenses, and the graph highlighted in this article appears – there is comment by somebody who did a rough calculation based on mRNA therapies that have failed human trials in the past. Based on his calculations…. well, let me just quote.

Great work. I did a small quick model using a Gaussian Distribution over 9 years to see what the numbers would be each year for “events” given 80% of the total population vaccinated had active ingredients and would develop events similar to past other mRNA failed trials. 7,887 deaths per week is about 179% above my model for 2022. If the past is indeed playing out here, this excess deaths per week will increase by a factor of 9 over the next year. Most adverse events in past similar trials did not take place until year three. By year six, 84% of the cohort was positive for adverse events.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/08/20/houston-we-have-a-problem-part-1-of-3/#comment-12577

TL;DR – It’s now very likely that these late jab deaths will increase dramatically during the next few years, based on mRNA therapy trial information which was available but seemingly ignored.

Watch this video if you have 3 minutes.

I would even go so far as to say that this highly censored video of an alleged mRNA trial participant from several years ago (see above), breaking his NDA and claiming serious cardiac problems affecting almost all of the people in his trial, may not be a fraud.

If that video is entirely true, then based on his numbers, my assessment is that his trial was very likely a secret depopulation trial flying under the false flag of a secret mRNA therapy trial. Which may then make COVID-19 and the jabs, the mother of all false flags.

In my opinion it is important to force the finding and recognition of the truth, so that we can begin saving the people who are not lucky.

Any effort to work toward #TeamHeadsOnPikes to prevent the next one of these incidents from happening, is a separate problem I leave for others. I’m a bit too good at forgiving.

TL;DR – There has been plenty of data telling us that the jabs are problematic, but now we are faced with very clear proof that CDC must easily see in their own data, yet pretends not to see. Combine these two memes.

The illogical arguments conceal real goals and tactics.

Buckle up. They know we know, and they have a plan for it.

Even More Mood Music

(Because you must FEAR CARBZILLA!)

https://youtu.be/BJHuX_jeSf4

Carbon Dioxide Is Life’s Friend and Savior

TL;DR – This graph shows terrestrial life’s remarkably high tolerance for carbon dioxide (which is basically recirculating plant life), but poor tolerance of meteoric impacts during times of low CO2 and preliminary glaciation. We are being severely gaslit, to see climate science backwards, and to operate from reflexive fears which prevent full, true and larger understanding.

The graph you see above is NOT the first one that I saw, which blew my mind, but it’s very similar. The one I saw was basically the orange line, and may have been GEOCARB III or a comparable study. It had the exact same principle features, which told me the same things.

Apparently I missed the “mass formation psychosis” in climate science, and just happened to walk in with my “They Live” glasses on.

Let me state for the record that “I am neither a professional geologist nor an earth scientist, but I have loved the subjects my whole life, and I can read a graph.”

More crucially, I have always been an “allied science fan” of geology and earth science – in part because earth chemistry and earth biology happen on this wonderful planet called Earth. Follow either of these sciences back to the basics, and earth science matters.

Back to the graph.

It’s worth explaining the basics of the scale across the bottom, which is time.

We are at the very end of the graph – a slice so thin that our lives will not show up even under a magnifier. Bring out a microscope and see a tiny hair’s breadth under it. That’s us.

We are at the most recent edge of the Neogene – which is the N on the bottom of the graph. That N is 23 million years. The “preparatory ancestry” of anything strongly resembling our kind easily fits into that, as best as we can tell. You might call it “the age of man“, where man includes pre-men and barely men.

Probably even these guys and gals.

**Humans trying to understand climate science.**

Next to the left is the Paleogene, abbreviated Pg. This is the “age of mammals“. You will note that while it is much bigger than the Neogene, it is still a VERY SMALL fraction of the history of life on the planet.

Let’s blow it up a bit, using a DIFFERENT type of graph, which is more of a timeline. More recent is at the top.

The three most significant climate events of that time period are on the right. They all bear explanation.

First, Antarctica got its first RECENT permanent ice sheets only a bit over 50 million years ago, near the END of this prior period, and the start of the “age of man”. When you see NOVA specials about Antarctic dinosaurs, or read about fossil specimens from Antarctica, this is why you see them. Antarctica used to be WARM, and gradually cooled down.

Interestingly, Antarctica has never* (*not settled) strayed far from the South Pole. It has not wandered “north-south” as much as many other land masses.

LIFE has at most times covered the entire globe. Life had not RETREATED from the poles to the extent that is has now. Indeed, polar life may have assisted in recovery from some mass extinctions, where prompt damage occurred primarily at the middle latitudes due to normal circulation patterns.

Next, look at the event called “PETM”, which stands for Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum. It’s actually a SPIKE that looks like the thin spike in THIS graph.

This graph is looking at global temperatures (green curve) as determined from oxygen isotopes, VERSUS time, across the “age of mammals”. Recent is on the right.

WOW. Will you look at how much temperatures have fallen. And look at that crazy chaotic glaciation in the lower right, flirting repeatedly with the snowball Earth of the Permian Extinction (to be discussed in a bit).

I don’t know about y’all, but if I had to be concerned about something, it might be that.

TL;DR – it is impossible to look a graphs which show life bottoming hard against planetary freeze, in the big picture of carbon dioxide (recirculating plant life) bottoming hard in conjunction, and walk away with any true sympathy for worries about increasing CO2 and warming. CO2 in times of its relative absence is either not a problem, or a “good problem”. It appears to me that a cultivated science error has been used to create a social hysteria and then a mass formation psychosis.

In a sense, we are ALL the “polar bears of the dinosaurs”. Is that a good thing? I think it’s worth asking, even just theoretically, never implying the need to “do something” about it.

Anyway, that little SPIKE you see in the spiky curve to the left, is an actual example of a “climate change crisis”. It was probably due to sudden period of massive volcanic activity throwing a bunch of CO2 into the air, although that’s not “settled science”. If there was a weird “solar excursion”, or undersea heating of the oceans (see extremely useful “non-eruptive volcanism” proposals by TES for part of recent global warming), then it could have been something else. Whatever it was, it seems to have been sharp enough to have probably been a single thing.

Note also that Earth got to the same point some years later, anyway.

Don’t fear the seasons. They’re not the reaper.

Lastly, we see in the timeline, at the beginning of the Paleogene, the K-Pg mass extinction, (also called, in its evidentiary form, the K-T boundary) which was almost certainly due to an asteroid impact, but possibly also reinforced by subsequent volcanism.

You may recall Steve’s post about this, but if you don’t, then take a quick detour and refresh your memory on the details.

Iridium: The Smoke From The Smoking Gun

4.567 billion years ago, our solar system began to “condense” from the nebula. Clumps of dust particles began to come together, part of a poorly-understood process that eventually led to the planets. The nebula had a potpourri of “stuff” in it. Mostly elements up to iron, with a heavy leavening of ones after iron, created in supernovas or even neutron star collisions. (Most gold is believed to have come out of neutron star collisions…next time you admire that gold coin or your wedding band…think about where that stuff has been! Any of it not from a collision got blasted out of a supernova at 70,000,000 miles per hour.)……
https://www.theqtree.com/2021/04/03/2021%c2%b704%c2%b703-joe-biden-didnt-win-daily-thread/

Steve explained that while most of paleontology favors the “impact theory”, there has been a long-standing volcanic theory of the extinction, and even a group who believes that BOTH theories are not only correct, but connected.

With my taste for “AND logic”, you can predict where I would most likely fall in that debate – in the “it’s both of them, and they’re connected” camp.

Does that sound sketchy? Maybe a little too much of a coincidence? Is Wolf going out on a limb here?

Notice that by mentioning that Steve had mentioned this “theory of both”, I used PEER INFLUENCE to change your minds. Now I will use MSM acceptance to further change your minds.

TL;DR – Theories about impacts leading to increased volcanism also implicated in extinctions, are quite appealing to me, personally, as a kind of “general volcanism” (impact + rebound), but the whole thing is NOT settled science by any means. Just remember what I always say about “AND logic”. It solves scientific divisions, too.

But wait – I want to make a point about the Fake News in action, spinning science to keep it divided.

Yes, you see the “AND” logic right in the title. And if you read the article, the whole point is that there is increasing evidence of a causal connection between the impact and the volcanism.

But notice the wording in the title versus the subtitle. The title tells you, but does not emphasize, that the conjoint, causatively connected, unified theory brings two scientific camps together, both being correct. Then the subtitle tries to shift things over to one of the explanations, and to minimize the role of the impact.

“The 160 million-year reign of the ‘terrible lizards’ may actually have ended due to events in India rather than an asteroid crashing into the sea off the coast of Mexico as previously thought“

“RATHER THAN”?

“Rather than” an asteroid the size of Mount Everest?

It’s very clear folks – THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED.

By now you know, it’s just what they do. DIVIDE AND CONQUER. Indeed, I tend to think it’s what they’re TRAINED to do.

The FAKE NEWS controls science FAR MORE than most scientists are willing to admit.

But let’s get back to our story of the unified theory of impact AND rebound volcanism.

The primary CLIMATIC effects of the asteroid impact are believed to have been blast heating, followed by an “impact winter”, followed by chaotic climate, possibly including a greenhouse due to vaporized CO2 and SO2, followed by the same thing from further classic volcanism. The whole planet was definitely MESSED UP.

TL;DR –

HOT (impact). COLD (darkness). HOT AGAIN (greenhouse).

Then repeat the latter two for post-impact volcanism.

A constant, unified pattern of impact extinctions, layered on the preexisting, livable climate, at a surprisingly wide range of levels of carbon dioxide.

So what was there before that?

THE DINOSAURS. That is “K”, the Cretaceous Period (in English).

You will notice that T (or Tr), J and K are the three big periods of the dinosaurs with which most of us are familiar – the Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous.

Let’s look at our graph again.

Yes. This “age of dinosaurs” was a period of warm temperatures and high carbon dioxide. Both much higher than what we have now, but – bear with me – there was a lot of LIFE, too – am I not right?

Well, what’s that stuff to the LEFT of the “age of dinosaurs” – around the end of “C” (Carboniferous) and the beginning of “P” (Permian – the “age of reptiles”)?

Why, it looks like low carbon dioxide, almost as low as we have now. In FACT, if you look even further back in time to the left – at the ages of sea organisms (Cm, O, S), fishes (D), and amphibians (C), what you’re basically seeing is a CRASH of carbon dioxide, ending in LOW CO2 around C and P.

And interesting that this slide had already resulted in massive glaciation of the planet, which existed at the beginning of the Permian.

Interesting that there were THREE BIG EXTINCTIONS along that slide, at O, D, and finally at P.

There is a LOT of debate about these extinctions, and particularly the near-total Permian (P) Extinction, also sometimes known as the P-T extinction event, because it occurred at the END of the Permian and the beginning of the Triassic.

Of course, global warming explanations of this event are favored by the single-minded corporate media, but IMO some of the best theories of the P-T extinction are actually based on an “iceball Earth” scenario, for which there is some interesting geological evidence.

The idea that an already glaciated Earth (Permian) was sent into deep freeze by an impact and response volcanism makes sense, and we would expect the extinctions to be more extensive than with the less glaciated or non-glaciated Cretaceous extinction of the dinosaurs, which happened to a generally warmer planet, thus sparing mammals and birds.

TL;DR – As the most significant extinctions have occurred at times of low CO2 and high glaciation, the main danger to life on Earth seems not to be global warming from CO2, which protects life from near-total extinctions. The main threat is solar blocking (see Bill Gates) and deep cooling, caused by meteoric impacts and rebound volcanism, which is more dangerous during times of low CO2 and high glaciation, like now or during the Permian Extinction.

In fact, I find the idea that we can use a single extinction mechanism repeatedly – a mechanism of “impact plus response volcanism, leading to plant death and further crises”, with the differences in outcome depending upon the size and location of the impact, plus the prior state of the climate, to be very satisfying – particularly in explaining why we find evidence for ALL of the various divided theories.

Furthermore, if response volcanism is a correct theory, then the general warmth and higher carbon dioxide of the “age of dinosaurs” may be explained by a truly massive impact being not only the cause of the P-T extinction, but also creating hundreds of millions of years of increased volcanism in its wake.

But all of that is debatable.

The big picture is this. Look at the graph again.

TL;DR – The Earth has supported life easily for eons because of MORE carbon dioxide, not less. There is no “climate emergency”, and certainly not one related to increasing carbon dioxide for ANY reason at this point. If anything, incipient normal solar cooling and periodic ice age glaciation are actual climate concerns for society. But that is another story for another time.

One More Bit of Mood Music

(Real World by Matchbox 20)

Green Energy Is Pol Pot Madness

TL;DR – Even if there was a “climate emergency” (which there is not, see above), and even if “green energy” worked (which it does not, see graph), and even if green energy could “save the environment” (which it absolutely does the opposite, due to energy density fundamentals), what we are doing by forcing a sudden transition to a non-working energy infrastructure, is so utterly preposterous, wrong, and irrational, that it must be stopped.

This graph is the smoking gun of an intentional civilizational crash. It is our duty to grab the steering wheel and stop it.

This graph is probably the simplest to explain because it does not depend on the truth or falsehood of the underlying bad science that has been used to justify what is being done now.

There are some things you just don’t do.

It’s like an insane person coming into your house screaming “DANGER, DANGER” and pointing a gun at you. Even if there is some reason, it doesn’t matter – an insane person is pointing a gun at you, and THAT is the immediate danger. The evil person or people who SENT the insane person to your house must be dealt with, too, or this will keep happening. But that can happen after we survive the insane attack.

Humanity is being “swatted” by people made insane by – you guessed it – mass formation psychosis.

TL;DR – One cannot move humanity from the top curve in red, to the bottom curve in yellow, without killing most of them. It’s impossible. It means poverty, chaos, and destruction. The closest thing to what “somebody” is forcing on the West, is what China and the CIA did the the people of Cambodia, using the highly deluded Khmer Rouge, who insisted that all Cambodians had to leave cities and become agrarian.

Forcing humanity to “quit realistic energy now” is perfectly analogous to Pol Pot saying “We all have to become farmers now” at gunpoint, which killed millions of Cambodians in a horror of totalitarian brutality and systematic societal error.

If you don’t think we have a deluded set of Americans who could carry this out, just look at Antifa, filled with mentally ill “trans” males, all of them “politically fluid” and ready to serve the craziest causes, and then politically reverse on orders, the very next day. Antifa is being protected by the DOJ and FBI, which are also ready to stop or hinder any groups which oppose Antifa.

Now you can understand why Antifa and FBI helped each other on January Sixth.

They’re both on the same side – the side of the genocide.

And now Biden wants 87,000 federal “IRS Police”?

What this graph shows is the equivalent of telling a patient addicted to barbiturates that they must quit cold turkey, which is always fatal.

It’s like telling a lifelong juvenile diabetic that they must quit insulin NOW because insulin didn’t come from their own pancreas, and so it’s “foreign”, and no good. They must transition to “mRNA injections in the pancreas” right now! RIGHT NOW!!!

Yup. It is THAT insane – that malevolent – to say “quit all non-green energy now”. To even say “do it in the next century” is foolishness of historic proportions.

We are already seeing the effects of the insanity in the beginning energy problems we are having now. But we have seen NOTHING yet.

Add to THAT insanity, what amounts to yet another foolish collectivization of agriculture, which “error” of communism has repeatedly killed millions, in the Soviet Union and China, as well as in Cambodia, and you can see that the errors of a misled scientific elite are always catastrophic, whether intentional or accidental.

TL;DR – Eisenhower predicted that, in addition to the military industrial complex (MIC), a scientific and technological elite (STE) would become a danger to America and the world, and he even understood and predicted that this very moment might arrive.

If you have time (16 minutes), this presentation is critical to understanding the moment. Every second is worth hearing.

If you get the sense that somebody of malevolent intent was listening to Eisenhower’s speech, and began figuring out how to sabotage his vision of balance and sense, by pursuing a course to enhance and take advantage of precisely the dangers that Eisenhower warned about, then you are not alone.

W

Text of the Eisenhower Farewell Speech

LINK: https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/president-dwight-d-eisenhowers-farewell-address#transcript

My fellow Americans:

Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.

This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.

Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.

Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.

My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.

In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.

******

We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America’s leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.

******

Throughout America’s adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.

Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology-global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle-with liberty at stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research-these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we which to travel.

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs-balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage-balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between action of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.

The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.

******

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peace time, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United State corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system-ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

******

Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society’s future, we-you and I, and our government-must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

******

Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.

Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose difference, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war-as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years-I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.

Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.

******

So-in this my last good night to you as your President-I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find somethings worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.

You and I-my fellow citizens-need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation’s great goals.

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America’s prayerful and continuing inspiration:

We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.

Final Musical Selection

(Dedicated to Trump’s friend Shinzo Abe.)

President Trump & Melania share traditional Japanese dinner with Prime Minister Abe & wife.

Dear KMAG: 20220228 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Microwave Monday / Google Is Now Anti-Science / mRNA Vaccines Really Do Change Your DNA

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

Get your rest, Trumpy Bear! You’re needed in WASHINGTON, DC!!!

Vladdy Bear and Winnie The Pooh are making Sleepy Creepy Joe look like a punching bag!

The Business At Hand

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But we’re ON A ROLL.

The Rules

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.

The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

Gonna be quick this time.

SO….. [ENGAGE BOILERPLATE…..]

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

Those who cannot deal with this easy requirement will be forced to jump the hoops of moderation, so that specific comments impugning other posters and violating the minimal rules can be sorted out and tossed in the trash.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

That includes the life skill of just ignoring certain other posters.

We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).

We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

After his speech at CPAC, I think it’s quite clear that praying for President Trump’s return to the White House is indeed praying for our enemies, who are too messed up to realize how much better off they would be under a Trump presidency.

MUSICAL INTERLUDE

For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.

Microwave Monday reminds me of this song from back in the day.

ENJOY!

This right here is the stiffest dose of teased-out 80s chick hair you are EVER going to get.

And if you want to see it with 2008 hair….

And then there’s an outdoorsy 2014 version which has a really great “live” feel…..

But how about a 2021 version with just Susanna Hoffs and a string section?

But if you’re still feeling like it’s all unfamiliar, here’s the original video!

Yeah – that’s more like it!

Call To Battle (H/T Sundance)

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.

…..and now for…..

Microwave Monday

After recent discussion of Havana Syndrome, and the possibility that it involves electromagnetic radiation (and in particular microwaves), I have decided that we all need to LEVEL UP our gut-level understanding of the electromagnetic spectrum – even beyond what Steve has done with his explanation of the science behind it.

This will also help us deal with both the REALITIES and DISINFORMATION of 5G telecom.

I will be doing this by giving you all a bunch of INFOGRAPHICS to get started.

Steve got us started HERE, in his 8th science lesson on LIGHT.

2021·06·19 Joe Biden Didn’t Win Daily Thread

You may remember some of this stuff….. (CLICK TO ENLARGE)

Let’s start breaking up that electromagnetic continuum into REGIONS that have NAMES.

You can see that microwaves lie between RADIO and INFRARED.

Let’s look even more closely at those groups.

We can even start breaking those radio and microwave regions down into BANDS that you are all familiar with.

Here you can start to get a feel for the SIZE OF THE WAVES versus objects and frequencies.

The SIZE OF WAVES and WHAT THEY AFFECT actually matters – although it’s not simple.

Megahertz, gigahertz, teraherz, and petahertz are all there.

You can really see it more easily in the following infographic.

You can easily see how we have made “radio devices” push farther and farther away from the very SAFE “radio” region, through television, mobile phones, and WiFi, closer and closer to the microwave and infrared radiation that constitutes COOKING MICROWAVES and RADIANT HEAT ITSELF.

And as you can see here, many technologies emit electromagnetic radiation – and some more than you may have realized.

So where are the 5G frequencies? Please be aware that there is constant change in this stuff, so that these infographics may be slightly out of date. Do not let that deter you – minor changes don’t NIX any issues of the basic range in which 5G operates, unless specifics of the science are given.

Use COMMON SENSE.

Let’s zoom in a bit.

Note that the above is just the US – other countries use different regions.

Here is more detail on European and US 5G.

Much of this is SQUARELY in the microwave region. From Wikipedia, we’re basically talking 300 MHz to 300 GHz.

Now let’s start looking at ALLEGED but possibly REAL health effects of EMR in the microwave region, which may VARY ACROSS THE REGION.

Remember also that DOSAGE MATTERS – like anything else.

You have to squint to see the next infographic, but look at “Biological Effect”.

It depends strongly on FREQUENCY / WAVELENGTH.

This is a very good listen. This lady is also a climate dupe, but she will get you to realize that your microwave devices may actually be doing to YOUR MEAT what microwaves normally do to YOUR MEAT, albeit at LOWER BUT LONGER DOSAGES.

This is another good one!

More of her schtick. This gal will get you to question the “harmless” narrative, just like vaccines, but try to keep some common sense. Remember – driving is a killer, too. You still want the freedom to drive?

Common sense! How do we get the BEST of both worlds?

Now I’m just going to play a bunch of their infographics. Caveat emptor! But some of this stuff is interesting and counter-intuitive. SIGNAL and NOISE matter. In more ways than one.

SO – maybe you should THINK about how to handle the devices you have!!!

But then talk back to all that stuff HERE.

Be sure to be SKEPTICAL of this SKEPTIC lady – that is an essential part of ETHICAL SKEPTICISM. We don’t want to be panicky about 5G, or believing disinformation, but we do want to treat MICROWAVES as maybe not that awesome for our health, in doses that exceed our individual sensitivity.

So BEWARE of BROAD-BRUSH SKEPTICS who downplay too much in favor of technology.

After all, we just got through a BATTLE ROYALE over disastrous mRNA technology that was advanced too fast for all the wrong reasons.

LINK: https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/electromagnetic-fields-and-parental-panics/

Finally, a GREAT infographic. It’s MASSIVE. I’m only showing you the small version – you have to click the link for the BIG ONE that’s easy to read down to the details.

MASSIVE EMR Infographic (Thumbnail)

MASSIVE EMR Infographic (Full Version)

LINK: http://www.50northspatial.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/EMR_Welch.png

So that’s it. Let’s start investigating 5G, Havana syndrome, spy devices, and microwave crowd control devices, with some intelligent skepticism.

And may be even start thinking about HEADBAND technology.

Google Is Now Anti-Science

Something stinks, and to my nose, it’s the New World Odor.

But first, a disclaimer.

I’m actually ashamed that I wanted to work for Google at one point, but I need to get that out into the open right away, lest somebody, someday, use that “gotcha” against me and think it’s actually damaging.

Heck – I even bought a variety of Google swag, back when they were small and upstarty, just like when Netscape, Firefox, various Linux brands, and other rising tech companies were once “new” and “cool”.

A lot of people once thought that Google’s motto of “Don’t be evil” was a bit of a bass-ackwards under-performer, which should have been a positive, rather than a double-negative. Not me. I realized back then that this paradoxical formulation was exactly why the motto was so ahead of the curve.

“Being good” lacks skepticism – particularly of self. “Being good” as a primary motivator is a guaranteed set-up for the primary sin of PRIDE.

“Not being evil”, in contrast, is automagically skeptical of self. And skepticism isn’t just good for science – it’s good for religion.

Yes – I think it’s clear you need both. This is part of why (IMO) Christianity always refreshes itself by going back to its Jewish roots when there are foundational questions. No matter how you slice it, we need to concern ourselves with the Law, which includes consequential negatives, because we don’t want to get rid of our saving prohibitions.

We need our Peters, but we also need our Pauls.

Thus, when Google ditched “don’t be evil”, I smelled trouble.

And what is happening now, may be evidence that Google has forgotten how to “not be evil”.

Google has made mistake after mistake since they began tampering politically with their search engine, largely during the Obama years, but to an even greater degree during the Trump years. And now, in one short year of Biden – Google has arrived at the point of adopting a policy that conflicts with the most basic principles of science.

Simone Gold, of America’s Frontline Doctors, just tweeted this.

WOW: @Google sent notice stating they will be removing the America’s Frontline Doctors website from search results.

We are a team of medical doctors who dared to speak the truth.

And we have been proven right, again and again, and again. pic.twitter.com/ayRwGNXgLQ
— Dr. Simone Gold (@drsimonegold) February 26, 2022

“Nor do we allow content from any site that contradicts or runs contrary to scientific or medical consensus and evidence-based best practices.”

Well THAT’S great. How do you think science is going to advance? YOU CHUMPS!

Let’s just save that tweet, simply to make sure that it doesn’t disappear when Twitter inevitably suspends Dr. Gold.

Note these final words from Dr. Gold.

“And we have been proven right, again and again, and again.“
Dr. Simone Gold, AFLD

Dr. Gold is not lying. Throughout COVID-19, free and independent doctors and scientists have been LEADING captive science and captive medicine against their BIASED FUNDERS AND CONTROLLERS – which clearly include GOOGLE now.

The “concensus” science has repeatedly and continuously been ABNORMALLY WRONG due to BIAS, and has required continuous correction by – very sadly – OUTSIDERS.

Science does not progress by sticking to consensus. It advances by CHALLENGE TO CONSENSUS. Google is INTERFERING with that process. SHAME!!!

In my opinion, “they” are all scared.

And the reason they’re scared it this.

Now – as insurance companies look around to see who picks up the tab for people dying from the ERRORS OF THE CONSENSUS, it sure ain’t gonna be able to pin it on the people who WARNED about the experimental vaccines.

It may indeed be that some of the blame (moral, even if not monetary) will land on those who CENSORED THE SAVING WARNINGS.

Over and over, people like Google censored us because they said that the things WE SAID were not true, and yet it turned out that the things we said WERE true, and that the consensus THEY said was true, was both WRONG and responsible for MANY DEATHS.

And THIS may be the biggest CENSORED TRUTH of all.

mRNA Vaccines Really Do Change Your DNA

You will notice that this tweet no longer exists.

https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1497284602540351491

It was up for a day, and then it disappeared. I was lucky we had copies up in WordPress.

Here is a “tweetstamp”, that proves that it really did exist.

https://tweetstamp.org/1497284602540351491

Here is the text, where Twitter can’t touch it.

Alden et al, Lund University, Sweden, confirms one of our worst fears. The exogenous genetic material coding for the dangerous Spike protein is reverse-transcribed into the human genome; possible long-term constitutive expression/synthesis of disease promoting/lethal Spike. pic.twitter.com/JEzSwSruWM— Peter McCullough, MD MPH (@P_McCulloughMD) February 25, 2022

Here, I saved an image of a copy which was only partially destroyed by Twitter.

And here I saved the actual tweet (in two pieces).

Here is that image within the tweet, in more detail.

So what is McCullough talking about? And what is Twitter hiding?

THIS SCIENTIFIC PAPER.

LINK: https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/TIfnZ

Open Access Article

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

by Markus Aldén¹ ,
Francisko Olofsson Falla¹,
Daowei Yang¹,
Mohammad Barghouth¹,
Cheng Luan¹,
Magnus Rasmussen² and
Yang De Marinis^1,*
¹Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 20502 Malmö, Sweden
²Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden
^*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Academic Editor: Stephen Malnick
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(3), 1115-1126; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073 (registering DOI)
Received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 19 February 2022 / Accepted: 23 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Clinical, Translational and Basic Research on Liver Diseases)

Abstract

Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase. Immunohistochemistry using antibody binding to LINE-1 open reading frame-1 RNA-binding protein (ORFp1) on Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 indicated increased nucleus distribution of LINE-1. PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.

Keywords: COVID-19 mRNA vaccine; BNT162b2; liver; reverse transcription; LINE-1; Huh7

I am going to call this the De Marinis paper, after the lead author, Yang De Marinis, to whom correspondence is to be addressed.

I do this in analogy to a very important COVID-19 paper I refer to as the Jaenisch paper, which bears heavily on this more recent work.

LINK: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1.full

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/XWC52

I have discussed the Jaenisch paper numerous times since I became aware of it in December of 2020, and more importantly in March of 2021.

In fact, in the following blog post I made in April of 2021, I actually hypothesized a scenario which is basically the findings of the De Marinis paper!!!

Wolf’s Red-Hot Date With Retrotranscriptive Faucipox

Alternate Title: Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective? Gloating Pre-Preface There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought. Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY …

Now – let me state, in the simplest possible way, what these papers mean.

The Jaenish paper proves that the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus alters human DNA.

The De Marinis paper proves that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine also alters human DNA.

Oh, there are quibbles that I’m “oversimplifying”, but they’re just quibbles, and I will show you WHY they are not just quibbles, but extremely disingenuous ones.

And please note that I am UNDERSTATING when I just say “alters DNA”. The Jaenish paper proves that the viral DNA changes are going into GENOMIC DNA. The De Marinis paper strongly suggests that THE SAME may be happening due to the vaccine.

But before I give you MY take on the De Marinis paper, let me give you the opinions of OTHERS.

Let’s review one first.

Peter McCullough:

Translation: The pseudo-mRNA code for the spike protein in the Pfizer vaccine gets into the genomic DNA inside human cells in test tube experiments, and produces both DNA and mRNA coding for what was uniquely in the vaccine. This new cellular DNA and RNA very likely (as a consequence) produces spike protein, causing long-term disease and health issues.

One can legitimately contest the assertion that genomic DNA is being altered (we don’t know this yet – hopefully soon), but any denial of the fact that CELLULAR DNA is being changed, is simply not “fact-based”.

For example, I saw “downplay trolls” on the original McCullough tweet, quibbling about in vivo vs. in vitro – that these results don’t “prove” that the same thing happens in living humans – only in living human cells in a test tube.

The reason this is a hypocritical crock of shit, is that “due to an abundance of caution”, almost every single “carcinogen” and other “bad boy chemical” that is restricted or controlled in the United States, at the cost of trillions of dollars which go into the pockets of the deep state and China, is because of IN VITRO results.

Thus, if it’s OK to have vaccines that do what Pfizer’s vaccine does, then it’s OK to remove the restrictions on benzene, and have benzene everywhere. Likewise for thousands of other chemicals.

Starting to see how this works? Let’s move on.

Alex Berenson:

Hey, remember how they told you the mRNA in the vaccines could NEVER wind up in human DNA? A new study out of Sweden suggests otherwise (at least in lab-grown cells).

Don’t worry, everything is fine.

After all, we have all that long-term placebo-controlled clinical trial data proving the safety of these mRNA shots.*

All that careful preclinical work too.**

*No we don’t.

**Not that either.

Karl Denninger:

LINK: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=245270

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/RpDoE

So About Not Needing Actual Study…[Comments enabled]

Oh, mRNA won’t get taken up into cell lines and thus can’t propagate on a permanent basis in the human body, we were told.

Indeed that’s rather important. Mutagenic (cancer), cytotoxic (you’re ****ed) and teratogenic (any child you give birth to or sire is ****ed) things that get into cellular DNA can lead to irreversible damage because most cells in the body are replaced on regular basis.

There’s an infamous quote that is in fact wrong: Our body fully replaces itself every seven years. That’s not true. It came out of a study that looked at the average age of cells in a human, using Carbon-14 dating. Anyone who has done any sort of statistical work knows the problem with averages: They are just that, and the statistical outliers are there but unaccounted for with such simplistic tripe.

There are several types of cells that are never replaced. Certain ones in the cerebellum, for example, that deal with coordination and balance, those in the ocular lenses and the eggs in a woman’s ovaries.

There are also cells that are much more-frequently replaced. Red blood cells, for example, have a roughly 90 day life cycle. This is why an A1c test, which measures glycated hemoglobin (that is, red cells that have been damaged by glucose) will tell you what your average blood glucose level has been over the last three months. The epithelial cells in your intestines last only about five days, and the live (dermal) part of your skin is replaced in about 2 weeks. Skeletal muscle and the rest of your intestines, on the other hand, are good for around 15 years.

But with few exceptions it is indeed true that most cells are in fact replaced. This is why you can get cancer; when there is an error in that replication the result can be a cell that has wildly damaged regulatory mechanisms on self-replication. If that damage kills the cell immediately then there’s no real foul, but if it leads to much more rapid reproduction…… that’s cancer.

We have known for quite a while that viruses can and do in some cases infiltrate into DNA. We know this because we’ve found pieces of viral RNA in our genome and not a few of them either; they’re literally all over the human genomic code. It’s wildly improbable that said congruence happened by random alignment of the various codons in our genetic code; ergo, it got in there at some point in evolution and then got into either the eggs of a developing female fetus or the sperm of a male and thus propagated. We only know, of course, about the integrations that weren’t fatal to offspring or the person in question. We also know that in general genetic mutation is harmful or fatal nearly all the time, so that we have said evidence in our genome means this sort of thing happens quite frequently and most of the time it screws the person who has it happen to them.

Indeed some cancers are blamed on viral infections where the viral RNA gets transcribed into the DNA of the cells and causes said errors.

mRNA is not really “new” technology; Moderna has been trying to make it work for cancer, for example, for a long time — without success. The reason for failure has always been dose-related toxicity that has overtaken the benefit when used in sufficient quantity to actually deliver a therapeutic effect. This is not an uncommon reason for drug and therapy failure; in fact that too happens all the time.

But we didn’t bother doing intermediate and longer-term study on the specifics of using mRNA (or, for that matter, a modified virus as with J&J) to deliver a partial viral payload in this regard before rolling it out. Instead, we just trusted that there’d be no integration. Indeed zero epigenic, mutagenic and teratogenic studies were done;they take years to do and we just flat-out didn’t bother. Where we had original control groups in the summer and fall of 2020 we intentionally destroyed them by giving the placebo arm of the original trials the drug three months later, making analysis on any sort of clean analytical basis impossible.

This was wild arrogance given that we know viruses do indeed integrate via infection. To presume it won’t happen here, when we cause cells to produce viral proteins, when the very same thing, producing viruses when a cell is infected, sometimes does is ridiculously and wildly-irresponsible arrogance.

Unfortunately now we’re finding out that said arrogance may well screw you and if it has there’s nothing you can do about it — and worse, could screw your offspring.

In the BNT162b2 toxicity report, no genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies have been provided [26]. Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects. At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome.

This study does not prove that said genetic pollution has occurred, but it raises the distinct possibility as the precursor events required for this to occur are now known to happen with scientific certainty.

We don’t know because we deliberately did not look; the studies were not done prior to use.

MORE: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=245270

I think I’ve given you enough to chew on for now.

The bottom line is this:

The Jaenisch paper was concerning smoke.

The De Marinis paper is a four-alarm FIRE.

Please warn everybody who is even THINKING about giving an mRNA vaccine to kids.

SET THESE VACCINES ASIDE until we know more. Even spike protein vaccines are too risky, IMO. Set them all aside.

And NEVER, EVER, EVER AGAIN, mandate another vaccine. This was our wake-up call.

Soon, we will talk about the BIG PICTURE of what is going on here.

Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

genome

noun

In the fields of molecular biology and genetics, a genome is all genetic information of an organism.^[1] It consists of nucleotide sequences of DNA (or RNA in RNA viruses). The genome includes both the genes (the coding regions) and the noncoding DNA,^[2] as well as mitochondrial DNA^[3] and chloroplast DNA. The study of the genome is called genomics. The genomes of several organisms have been sequenced and genes analyzed. The human genome project which sequenced the entire genome for Homo sapiens was successfully completed in April 2003.

genomic DNA

Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (abbreviated as gDNA^[1]) is chromosomal DNA, in contrast to extra-chromosomal DNAs like plasmids. Most organisms have the same genomic DNA in every cell; however, only certain genes are active in each cell to allow for cell function and differentiation within the body.^[2]

The genome of an organism (encoded by the genomic DNA) is the (biological) information of heredity which is passed from one generation of organism to the next. That genome is transcribed to produce various RNAs, which are necessary for the function of the organism. Precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) is transcribed by RNA polymerase II in the nucleus. pre-mRNA is then processed by splicing to remove introns, leaving the exons in the mature messenger RNA (mRNA). Additional processing includes the addition of a 5′ cap and a poly(A) tail to the pre-mRNA. The mature mRNA may then be transported to the cytosol and translated by the ribosome into a protein. Other types of RNA include ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and transfer RNA (tRNA). These types are transcribed by RNA polymerase II and RNA polymerase III, respectively, and are essential for protein synthesis. However 5s rRNA is the only rRNA which is transcribed by RNA Polymerase III.^[3]

Used in a sentence:

While we tend to be more concerned about changes to genomic DNA, changes to any kind of human DNA are potentially problematic.

Used in a picture:

Used in a video:

OK – I think that’s enough geekiness for now.

That’s all, folks!

ENJOY THE SHOW

Have another great week!

W

Dear KMAG: 20220207 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Pandemic of the Vaccine – Are mRNA Vaccines Fundamentally Flawed?

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

Get your rest, Trumpy Bear! You’re going back to the White House!!!

We need to restore sanity in the White House, and it’s time to get Winnie the Pooh OUT.

The Business At Hand

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But it doesn’t matter, because with God, every day is glorious!

And if you need that in a song…… ONE MORE TIME…..

The Rules

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.

The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

Thus we are assembled here to peacefully address our grievances to whom they may concern, even each other, using both our freedom of speech and of press, as well as our freedom of religion.

SO….. [ENGAGE BOILERPLATE…..]

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

That includes the life skill of just ignoring certain other posters.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump prays with pastors during a campaign visit to the International Church of Las Vegas and the International Christian Academy in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S., October 5, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Segar

MUSICAL INTERLUDE

For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.

YouTube is absolutely bombarding me with videos of that Japanese art-pop girl-band “Perfume” that I showed on Friday. The YouTube Wocommie Mensheviks must have some foul intention, so I think I’ll go looking for something else, but just ONE video is a good lead-in, so here you go.

Thankfully, YouTube isn’t just recommending girl groups to me, as long as I get OFF a girl group video page, in which case girl groups are THE ONLY THINGS they recommend.

On a “blank” YouTube page, I also get “epic music” now!

This is a nice one. Don’t mind the “furries” and assorted anime characters.

https://youtu.be/XrisCsNzOlo

This is a long one, too – you can come back for it while reading the features below.

Next, we have one of Wheatie’s favorite artists – Two Steps From Hell – celebrating our lady warriors!

Yes – beware those who would go after our kids…….

They might not be expecting WHO exactly it is, who will DELIVER THE MILLSTONES.

So let’s close out with a REAL girl group – complete with a fiddle!

Now THAT’S what I’m talkin’ about!

Call To Battle

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.

Pandemic of the Vaccine

Are mRNA Vaccines Fundamentally Flawed?

As promised in Friday’s post…..

DEAR KAG: 20220204 – … The End of the mRNA Vaccines …

…..I want to discuss a research paper that was brought to my attention by Gail Combs.

BUT FIRST, let me freshen you up with where things were as of February 3, when Robert Malone had THIS to say about the military data showing that the mandated mRNA jabs were definitively causing harm.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vtztbk-the-covid-vaccine-side-effects-are-worse-than-expected.html

That’s just a quick overview of the problem. Here’s the latest, and in more detail. H/T TradeBait2 for this one. This addresses the jaw-dropping and eye-rolling defense by NIH and their Pentagram buddies, which just dropped military credibility by another factor of two.

Is woke mil causing damage? COMMUNISM always causes damage!

LINK: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/regarding-the-defense-medical-epidemiological

As Malone points out in the latter article, in a beautifully understated way, the “defenders of the jab” are now offering excuses that strain credibility to the breaking point. It is very easy to see that the other side is committed to any deception, of other or of self, to keep the jab train rolling.

They are NOT willing to honestly look at the striking relative dangers of these BAD VACCINES.

Something is very wrong, we can plainly see, but let’s just play along and pretend that this whole ridiculous scenario still deserves debate.

We have plenty of observations at this point, but the “old theory of harmless jabs” is able to play “what about” and temporarily evade many if not most of those explanations, lacking an obviously more compelling theory of WHY THE JABS CAUSE HARM, which would make “whataboutisms” unpalatable, even to those who want to believe them.

Well, is there such a compelling theory?

We have advanced certain key principles which explain things, and those are important.

We know about the pathogenic spike protein.

We know about vaccine migration and persistence.

But something is different, now.

NOW we have a theory which includes both of those things, PLUS a principle of IMMUNOLOGICAL ERROR.

In my opinion, we’re there.

The title of this work is:

Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs

January 2022

DOI:10.22541/au.164276411.10570847/v1

Project: COVID 19

Authors:

Stephanie Seneff

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Greg Nigh

Immersion Health

Anthony Kyriakopoulos

Nasco AD Biotech Lab

Peter A Mccullough

(Could have said Baylor College of Medicine, but Baylor is historically inept, IMO)

LINK: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs

PDF: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stephanie-Seneff/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs/links/61f0b7838d338833e395e22f/Innate-Immune-Suppression-by-SARS-CoV-2-mRNA-Vaccinations-The-role-of-G-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-microRNAs.pdf

The Abstract

The abstract is instructive, and if you want to “TL;DR” past the rest of things, at least give that a read. Better yet, stick around for my interpretation of the abstract.

ABSTRACT

The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease had no precedent, but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures. The mRNA vaccines utilize genetically modified mRNA encoding spike proteins. These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses, promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins, and provoke higher overall spike protein production. However, both experimental and observational evidence reveals a very different immune response to the vaccines compared to the response to infection with SARS-CoV-2. As we will show, the genetic modifications introduced by the vaccine are likely the source of these differential responses. In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage. We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.

What I absolutely LOVE, LOVE, LOVE about this abstract, is that it takes some of the most key points of what the Fake News calls “conspiracy theories” and restates them in fact-bolstered scientific jargon that absolutely cannot be disputed. It’s just beautiful.

Because this abstract is important for understanding as we go into the paper, I’m going to take it “line by line” and explain, so that when we get to the paper itself, you can understand what is being talked about and get the gist of it, even if the scientific nuances are not entirely clear to you.

There are TWELVE sentences, each worthy of consideration.

HANG ON FOR A QUICK WARM-UP RIDE.

Analyzing the Abstract

(1) The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19.

“Widely perceived”.

This is an unarguable fact. It’s a great way to start the argument. State a truth without leaning on the “real crisis” narrative cheese in the center of the trap.

It does NOT say that the mRNA vaccines were brought to market unreasonably, which is open to debate, and which will be a contested question. Remember – many people (including me) HOPED that new technologies – which we were led to believe were needed – would free us from the virus.

Are you starting to see how they USED Trump? In my opinion, we still don’t understand the full extent of the deception and counter-deception. But none of that is said here – it is just ALLOWED under the statement of fact without narrative.

(2) The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease had no precedent, but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures.

“Seemed to”.

This is also factual, if we’re honest. The Jab Justifiers will quibble about veterinary vaccines, and experimental vaccines, and all that, as precedents, but those are quibbles. The truth is, you and I never got one of these genetic vaccines before, and that’s because they had never been approved before.

The beauty of this phrasing – “but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures” – is that it forces us to admit the context of the phony crisis created by the Fake News and Democrats, by only saying “seemed to call for” instead of “called for”.

What the authors are doing here is dropping out the “fake normal” created by the media.

And THAT is an ongoing lesson for science itself to return to control by science and TRUTH.

(3) The mRNA vaccines utilize genetically modified mRNA encoding spike proteins.

This is absolutely true, and absolutely key. The mRNA of the vaccines encodes a FULL “half” of a very particular version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. However, in order to accomplish several goals, the mRNA which WOULD code for that half of the spike protein is substantially altered in several different ways to make the whole process work.

And that leads to the next sentence.

(4) These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses, promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins, and provoke higher overall spike protein production.

There is a lot of nuance here, so I will take some time to explain the 3 items.

(a) These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses

There are multiple reasons that the “mRNA” of the vaccines is not actually normal mRNA, but a kind of “pseudo” mRNA.

Cells have to be careful not to “execute the instructions” of what is essentially WRONG RNA. Cells are a lot like soldiers who have been trained to NOT carry out unconstitutional orders.

The fact that mRNA vaccines and related forms of mRNA-based gene therapy actually work AROUND cellular defenses is a hint RIGHT THERE that they might do something bad. Our bodies are designed to FIGHT OFF foreign mRNA.

Be careful how you interpret what I’m saying there. It’s not an indictment of the mRNA method per se, because MANY if not ALL drugs have to “work around cellular and bodily defenses”. That is a huge part of the science of drug delivery.

HOWEVER, it is always cautionary to admit THAT one is working around defenses, because this will inform one as to the RISKS which are being taken BY working around those defenses.

What if you aren’t actually working around the risks?

So, one truth is that the mRNA has certain bases changed to avoid “tipping off” those defenses. It’s a SNEAKY and LUCKY break that we actually CAN work around those defenses.

But are we doing so CLEANLY and to good outcome?

(b) promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins

This is a HUGE double-edged sword.

Remember – the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein CHANGES SHAPE as it breaks into the cell. When it’s all done, it looks like a different protein – even to antibodies.

The drug designers have (literally, but synthetically) mutated the original reported Wuhan spike protein sequence. The primary reason to do this, is to make the protein “LOCK IN” the original, highly infectious, three-dimensional shape of the “fresh” protein, so that antibodies will form PROPERLY against that, instead of forming against depleted, spent, “used” spike protein. This reduces the chances of ADE (antibody-dependent disease enhancement), which comes from “inappropriate antibodies” that evolved to the WRONG TARGET.

The problem with stabilizing the highly pathogenic spike protein for triggering more desirable antibody formation, is that it also stabilizes the highly pathogenic spike protein for pathogenesis, too.

“WHOOPS!”

So – spike-protein-based “long haul” symptoms from the vaccine can be very long – even compared to long haul from the disease. The synthetic spike protein is really good at sticking around in its mutated, long-lasting, highly pathogenic form.

And THAT might not be a good thing.

Ask this question – why doesn’t the VIRUS do that? Maybe a more stable protein is not only bad for the virus, but also bad for the host, and THAT is in turn bad for the virus AGAIN.

Nature is smart – especially when it cuts a deal with multiple organisms to INCREASE LIFE.

This is a DIRECT call-out of a problem that will almost certainly lead to arguments with “peer reviewers” who want to defend the vaccines. Note that the wording very intentionally does not say “These alterations are intended to…..[three things]” – it simply says “These alterations….. [three things].”

The alterations are INTENDED to provoke higher overall spike protein antibody production. But the fact is, unless the increase in antibodies comes from better and stronger adjuvants, which act as immunity multipliers, then it’s coming from higher (or otherwise more antigenic and pathogenic) overall spike protein production.

Thus, peer reviewers who want to cover up spike protein malfeasance will likely insist on dragging the wording back to being about the antibodies. This follows the lead of Tony Fauci and his “antibody hypnosis” act, designed to keep attention OFF all of the things that are WRONG with the vaccines.

As you can see, we’re only 4 sentences in, and there is a lot of “battle prep” already going on.

(5) However, both experimental and observational evidence reveals a very different immune response to the vaccines compared to the response to infection with SARS-CoV-2.

This is a very general but very powerful FACTUAL statement, which DEFIES the Fauci / Fake News narrative – a narrative which can’t even bring itself to ADMIT that disease-conferred immunity is a reality.

This is a point about which – if you have read even SOME of the COVID-19 scientific literature – there is literally no debate. Only in the Fake News media and on controlled social media is this twisted. Scientists now marvel ALL THE TIME at the differences between vaccine-conferred immunity and disease-conferred immunity.

And, almost ALWAYS, practically speaking (but ignoring any risks of acquiring immunity), disease-conferred immunity is superior.

You will note that Fauci NEVER talks about this stuff.

But there is more – much more. ANY adverse effects which happen due to the vaccines and not the disease, or happen MORE with the vaccines, rightly count as differences.

The paper is not saying this out loud – but you can understand that it is implied.

This right here – the point about a difference between vaccine immunity and disease immunity – is the HAMMER of the gun going back and making a “clicking” noise.

(6) As we will show, the genetic modifications introduced by the vaccine are likely the source of these differential responses.

THIS HERE IS THE BIGGIE.

There are SO MANY potential implications here, I don’t want to steal their thunder from the analysis of the paper.

However, without knowing ANYTHING FURTHER, this is a profoundly common-sense scientific statement. It is simply saying that different molecules from the virus RNA may lead to different outcomes. That’s almost a no-brainer.

This could happen in multiple different ways.

differences in how the “changed mRNA” is handled by the body
differences in how it is interpreted
differences in the protein product

All of this makes wonderful sense.

(7) In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.

Oh, wait – THIS is the biggie.

This is saying that there is an important cellular communication screw-up with mRNA vaccination – a screw-up which does not occur with natural infection. Stated in reverse, there IS an important cellular communication channel opened during natural infection, which is MISSED by the mRNA vaccines.

IN OTHER WORDS, A PROGRAMMING ERROR.

This is all too believable to me, because I’ve seen this before. And NOT just when I “learned to code”.

This is LITERALLY a sibling programming error of what happens when too many vaccines are given at the same time, and interferon signals STEP ON EACH OTHER.

Now the Fake News media “fact checkers” absolutely will not admit that there is a problem with multiple simultaneous vaccines, but once the standard mechanism of vaccine-acquired immunity was explained to me, it became OBVIOUS AS HELL that signal interference was behind the observed but somewhat unpredictable problems with tight vaccine schedules.

You are allowed to have a different scientific opinion from these biased and forked-tongued “fact checkers” with agenda.

But let’s save the details for later.

For now, just remember that humans are evolutionarily adapted for disease, not hacky pseudo-mRNA vaccines. Our PROGRAMMING MODEL – our DESIGN – our API – is different from what the hackers thought they could get away with, and they got caught.

(8) We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites.

More specifics.

This is fascinating, because AND LOGIC is now telling me that it’s not just the vaccine migrating, but spike protein as well.

And THAT explains a LOT.

Do you see how everything is tying together nicely around the pathogenic spike protein that is NOT being degraded soon enough or fast enough, like the VIRUS DOES FOR US?

Think about our little human biome friends next time, science. They may have a BETTER PLAN.

(9) We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance.

OK, this is bad stuff. But it’s also bad stuff that is right up the alley of FAKE SCIENCE to now “discover” and get big bucks to study. It’s DETAILS that cannot be dismissed.

This is the GRENADE thrown into the narrative machine gun bunker with half a second left on the fuse.

KABOOM.

This is where every “me too!” funding whore is going to jump on the bandwagon with justification.

(10) These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage.

Oh, wait! Isn’t this the stuff that Robert Malone warned us about?

Isn’t this the stuff that Ryan Cole spotted?

Isn’t this the stuff that FAKE NEWS ignored and “debunked”, but is now appearing in every possible mainstream source of data?

Common sense is going to win here.

INVESTORS had better TAKE NOTE. The landscape is going to change, IMO.

(11) We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis.

The beauty of VAERS is that it’s flawed, but we know HOW it’s flawed.

Thus, if you see something that can only be MAGNIFIED by correcting for the known flaws, then you have something you can use.

Just stroll past those Fake News fact checkers and Fake Social Media “con-TROLLS” who spew their talking point about “VAERS IS A FLAWED SYSTEM”. SORRY. Not good enough, trolls.

Everything is a flawed system. Knowing the DIRECTION of the flaws is what turns all systems into useful logical tools.

We will use common sense here, long after these people who deny it are OUT OF POWER.

(12) We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.

This is where they land when all is said and done.

They’re saying that they believe the risks outweigh the benefits with THESE vaccines.

This does NOT say that vaccination per se is a bad strategy for COVID-19.

It says that mRNA vaccination as it currently exists is not a good strategy for COVID-19.

It doesn’t say that viral vector cDNA, “full” spike protein subunit antigen, or RBD subunit antigen vaccines are doubtful in any way. They may be, but the authors don’t say that (although some of the specifics DO have implications for the other vaccines).

The authors only say that THESE particular, current, mRNA vaccines are “not positive contributors to public health”.

And you can do the math from there.

Can the current mRNA vaccines be fixed?

Good question. This paper is likely a roadmap to any such fixes. But until then…..

Mandating these vaccines is WRONG, if not INSANE.

Analyzing the Paper

Now we get to the meat of the paper.

I am just going to drop my impressions, placing them in context as needed. On some of these, I blab on and on. On others, I just make a short point. I do a lot of quoting where the authors say it nicely. This is very seat-of-the-pants.

Introduction

The FIRST paragraph is a generous summary of the basics of vaccination, FULLY in compliance with the CDC definitions. Please take note of that. There is no quibbling about the mRNA vaccines not being vaccines.

The SECOND paragraph summarizes and exemplifies the presence in the literature of a viewpoint that the mRNA vaccines are very similar to natural immunity. There is a point made that is basically my contention of Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis”, but it is phrased very politiely.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) makes the case based upon antibody titers generated by prior infection vs. vaccination, in addition to production of memory B cells, to argue that the immune response to vaccination is analogous to the response to natural infection [4]. It is this similarity in the humoral immune response to vaccination vs natural infection, paired with both trial and observational data demonstrating reduced risk of infection following vaccination, that stands as the justiﬁcation for the mass vaccination campaign.

The THIRD paragraph is long, but absolutely key.

It is the summary of the guts of the paper.

You will note that the authors are pointing out EXISTING MAINSTREAM SCIENCE which is contradicting the media-trumpeted, but “CDC-silent” narrative that vaccination is superior to “natural immunity”, by pointing out (without saying it bluntly) that it’s not even AS GOOD as disease-conferred immunity, because known “good” responses to the natural antigen are completely missing.

And worse than that, the mRNA vaccines seem to do WRONG THINGS to the immune system as well.

In this paper we explore the scientiﬁc literature suggesting that vaccination with an mRNA vaccine initiates a set of biological events that are not only diﬀerent from that induced by vaccination but are in several ways demonstrably counterproductive to both short- and long-term immune competence and normal cellular function. These vaccinations have now been shown to downregulate critical pathways related to cancer surveillance, infection control, and cellular homeostasis. They introduce into the body highly modiﬁed genetic material. A medRxiv preprint has revealed a remarkable diﬀerence between the characteristics of the immune response to an infection with SARS-CoV-2 as compared with the immune response to an mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 [5]. Diﬀerential gene expression analysis of peripheral dendritic cells revealed a dramatic upregulation of both type I and type II interferons (IFNs) in COVID-19 patients, but not in vaccinees. One remarkable observation they made was that there was an expansion of circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in COVID-19 patients, but this expansion was notably absent following vaccination. A striking expansion in circulating plasmablasts observed in COVID-19 patients was also not seen in the vaccinees. All of these observations are consistent with the idea that the vaccines actively suppress type I IFN signaling, as we will discuss below. In this paper we will be focusing extensively, though not exclusively,on vaccination-induced type I IFN suppression and the myriad downstream eﬀects this has on the related signaling cascade.

Again, I point out that this is being pulled out of the “mainstream” literature.

Does this immune suppression that researchers found remind you of anything?

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/NmhFesU2aPue/

Note that this is on BitChute because YouTube deleted it as “misinformation”.

If you’re thinking “Wow, the media and social media has really screwed up science!”, well, all I can say is “They won’t be able to walk the streets.”

The FOURTH paragraph then begins dropping bombs on the Pfizer clinical trial shenanigans, which basically covered up the placebo group to obfuscate vaccine problems.

The message is roughly “Because Pfizer covered things up by vaccinating their placebo group, as well as other tricks, we were forced to look at VAERS and the scientific literature to find out what the vaccines are doing – AND BOY, DID WE FIND A TON OF PROBLEMS.”

But done much more politely.

The next two paragraphs are a WITHERING ATTACK on the vaccines, simply using the scientific literature. OMG – the spatter on the walls – there are quite a few easy targets that the Fake News Media has been protecting by ignoring, but it’s very hard to “memory hole” the scientific literature to those who can “pay to play”, so the authors just mention a string of scientific findings that Fauci hoped the public would never see.

Thus, the FIFTH paragraph is a summary of VACCINE FAILURE, with references.

The SIXTH paragraph then brings up the wonderful idea that if benefits are as low as we now understand them to be, maybe RISKS need a closer look.

You may want to read the whole introduction, because that is the last easily readable section of the paper for a while.

NOW it gets really technical.

Interferons: An Overview with Attention to Cancer Surveillance

This section is extremely complex and hard to read, even if you’re familiar with most or all of the various biochemical and biological acronyms that are thrown into the melange.

It starts off with a review of what is known about INTERFERONS (IFNs), as well as substances which regulate them, known as INTERFERON REGULATING FACTORS (IRFs).

This is what you need to know:

Type I IFNs play a powerful role in the immune response to multiple stressors. In fact, they have enjoyed clinical therapeutic value as a treatment option for a variety of diseases and conditions, including viral infections, solid tumors, myeloproliferative disorders, hematopoietic neoplasms and autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis [16].
As a group, IFNs play exceedingly complicated and pleiotropic roles that are coordinated and regulated through the activity of the family of IFN regulatory factors, or IRFs [17]. IRF9 is most directly involved in anti-viral as well as anti-tumor immunity and genetic regulation [18-20].

Basically, interferons are critical players in the CLEANUP OF GENETIC BAD GUYS CAUSING TROUBLE. Those genetic bad guys can be EXTERNAL WRONG-GENES (viruses) or they can be ROGUE CELLS (cancer and the like).

This section then summarizes the complex interactions and feedback loops which characterize anything involving interferons, but particularly related to their anti-cancer role. It is made exceedingly clear that improper interferon levels and disruptions of the complex interferon systems are known to lead very directly to clinical appearance of cancers of various kinds.

Near the end, COVID-19 is brought into the mix. A recent Chinese paper is cited, the work having shown interference with IRF signaling by a non-mRNA, inactivated virus, COVID-19 vaccine. The changes are EXPECTED to reduce resistance to cancers, and the mechanisms are discussed in detail. ELEGANTLY, those same mechanisms are found in Alzheimer’s patients, and appear related to development of dementia symptoms that sound remarkably like COVID brain fog.

Finally, a documented case of a rare lymphoma being accelerated by the Pfizer vaccine is described, and a summary statement is given:

Given the universally recognized importance of optimally functioning BRCA1/2 for cancer prevention and given the central role of the TRAIL signal transduction pathway for additional cancer surveillance, the suppression of IRF7 and IRF9 through vaccination and subsequent spike protein production is extremely concerning for long-term cancer control in injected populations.

Considerations in the Design of mRNA Vaccines

This section basically describes the long list of HACKS – many of them very ELEGANT HACKS – that were needed to get all the way from Robert Malone’s initial discovery which enabled mRNA gene therapy, to where mRNA vaccines are today.

The implications of all these hacks for relevant IMMUNOLOGICAL and GENETIC biochemistry, including INTERFERONS and CANCER, are described.

This section SETS UP the long list of concerns which are going to necessarily follow.

Quite a bit of attention is paid to the components of the lipid nanoparticles, their roles, and their potential risks and side-effects.

This section is fairly readable, and if you’re curious about the various hacks, and particularly the purpose and mechanism of the lipid nanoparticles, then you may enjoy reading past the jargon.

GC enrichment and potential G4 (pG4) structures in vaccine mRNAs

This is a difficult section to understand, if you’re not familiar with DNA and RNA “beyond the double helix”. It’s a bit like Morse code. Everybody knows what Morse code is, and maybe how to do an “SOS”, but not many people remember Morse code well enough to compose and send long signals at will, let alone send a telegram. OTOH, if you’re in genetic medicine or biology, you may be familiar with more than just 4 bases and the double helix.

The bottom line is that, among the various hacks that have gone into the mRNA vaccines, some of them are basically “genetic tricks” to increase production of spike protein. The PROBLEM with that, is that the FINAL implications of some of these tricks are not fully known.

Because there is redundancy in the genetic language, and the efficiency of different spellings is not the same (nite vs. night, thru vs. through, etc.), certain things can be re-encoded using the most efficient letters to create MOAR SPIKE PROTEIN. And MOAR is always BETTER. RIIIIIIIIGHT?

Well, it turns out that spellings have implications for how mRNA behaves. How mRNA behaves has implications for things like CANCER.

Going back to the title of this section, “G” and “C” are the efficient bases that are switched to, to make proteins with higher efficiency. The problem THERE is that “G” can do something every interesting – it can bind with itself in a square, to form a quadruple helix called a “G quadruplex”, which is abbreviated G4. See the image above for cross-sections of such a structure, at the point of binding.

There are ways to predict if a G quadruplex will form – these cases are called “pG4” for “potential G quadruplex”.

Midway through the section, this quote:

Summarizing the topic to this point, the enrichment of GC content in vaccine mRNA will inevitably lead to an increase in the pG4 content of the vaccines. This, in turn, will lead to dysregulation of the G4-RNA-protein binding system and a wide range of potential disease-associated cellular pathologies including suppression of innate immunity, neurodegeneration, and malignant transformation [83].

There are further implications. The more mRNA can form these self-shielding quadruplexes, the less that “micro RNAs” – miRNAs – can bind to the mRNA and control the expression. And THAT leads to another cascade of potentially unintended consequences.

The multitude of pG4s in the mRNA of the vaccine would predictably act as decoys, distracting miRNAs from their normal function in regulating human protein expression. The increase in G4 targets due to the vaccine would decrease the availability of miRNAs to target human-expressed G4s for regulation of gene expression. This can result in downregulation of miRNA expression which is implicated in cardiovascular pathology [96], onset of neurodegeneration [97], and/or cancer progression [98].

Type I IFNs and COVID-19

This is a very interesting section on the relationship of interferons to COVID-19. It appears that:

lower levels of interferons lead to more severe COVID-19 outcomes
IFNs can be used for treatment early, but make things worse if given late
interferons seem to prevent infection by COVID-19
this would explain enhanced susceptibility to COVID-19 after vaccination
COVID patients with antibodies against interferons are common in severe cases

Interferons are clearly key, and look to be one of the most significant differences between the disease and the vaccine.

Are the methylation strategies for cellular housekeeping generally omitted by vaccine mRNAs?

This is a rhetorical question about one of the hacks used by the mRNA vaccines.

To put it a bit too simply, the synthetic mRNA is “capped” both to evade detection AND to generate more spike protein, and most likely without regard for downstream unintended consequences, due to the fact that capping is normally supposed to be both a signaling and a regulating mechanism. The “hack” abuses this feature to make more spike protein.

Rather than simply making an accusation, the question is asked, whether the hack accounted for some of the more likely consequences.

E.g., …..

Furthermore, this also means that eIF4E, which is a powerful oncogene regulator and cell proliferation modulator, will sustain its activities by this competition, for an unnaturally prolonged period of time, trying to counterbalance the competition between robustly-capped mRNAs in vaccines and IRES-containing mRNAs[113,65]. This type of condition results in dysregulation of co-transcriptional m6A mRNA modiﬁcations and seriously links to molecular progressions of various cancers [114], as well as creating predisposing conditions for subsequent viral infections [113].

My money is on the idea that nobody in the management chain at Pfizer or Moderna gave a flying F, because Fauci and Walensky are all about the antibodies. This is a CLASSIC downstream effect of antibody hypnosis.

Exosomes and MicroRNAs

This is an interesting grab-bag of stuff, and it’s not that hard to follow, for the most part, so you may want to read it.

Exosomes are basically little bubbles of cell that break off and carry crap, a lot like “virus-like particles” or even “lipid nanoparticles”. It turns out that much of the spike protein which is produced in vaccine-infected cells LEAVES THE SCENE inside exosomes, or studded into their surface. This was in fact discovered by a group in India.

Also, under conditions of overwhelming production of spike protein due to SARS-CoV-2 molecular vaccination, it would of course be expected that a signiﬁcant proportion of over-abundant intra-cellular spikeproteins would also be exported via exosome cargoes [128]. A seminal paper by a research team in India investigated the role of exosomes in the cellular response to internally synthesized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [50]. They wrote in the abstract:“We propose that SARS-CoV-2 gene product, Spike, is able to modify the host exosomal cargo, which gets transported to distant uninfected tissues and organs and can initiate a catastrophic immune cascade within Central Nervous System (CNS).”

Things get even worse. It turns out that these exosomes also carry micro-RNAs that turn off interferons in the distant places to which they carry the spike protein.

Thus, the available evidence strongly suggests that endogenously produced spike protein creates a diﬀerent microRNA proﬁle than does natural infection with SARS-CoV-2, and those diﬀerences entail a potentially wide range of deleterious eﬀects.
A central point of our analysis below is the important distinction between the impact of vaccination versus natural infection on type I IFN. While vaccination actively suppresses its production, natural infection promotes type I IFN production very early in the disease cycle. Those with preexisting conditions often exhibit impaired type I IFN signaling, which leads to more severe, critical, and even fatal COVID-19. If the impairment induced by the vaccine is maintained as antibody levels wane over time, this could lead to a situation where the vaccine causes a more severe disease expression than would have been the case in the absence of the vaccine.
Another expected consequence of suppressing type I IFN would be reactivation of preexisting, chronic viral infections, as described in the next section.

SO – this would explain “vaccine-induced disease enhancement” – not antibody-dependent (ADE), but rather interferon-dependent (IDE). And in this case, it could be significantly different diseases that are being enhanced, because of the generality of the interferon network.

Speaking of which…..

Reactivation of Varicella-zoster

Fully consistent with the proposed vaccine-induced negative effects on interferon signaling, would be the significant number of cases of shingles appearing post-vaccination with the mRNA vaccines.

There is also a documented case of viral hepatitis flaring up because of the vaccine.

An additional case of viral reactivation is noteworthy as well. It involved an 82-year-old woman who had acquired a hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection in 2007. A strong increase in HCV load occurred a few days after vaccination with an mRNA Pﬁzer/BioNTech vaccine, along with an appearance of jaundice. She died three weeks after vaccination from liver failure [142].

Personally, I have no desire to get shingles again.

Impaired DNA Repair and Adaptive Immunity

As stated – more examples from the literature.

We have to speed up here. This is a long paper.

Immune Thrombocytopenia

This is your “clot shot” mechanism, explained.

This quote is interesting.

It has been shown that the mRNA vaccines elicit primarily an immunoglobulin G (IgG) immune response, with lesser amounts of IgA induced [155], and even less IgM production [156]. The amount of IgG antibodies produced is comparable to the response seen in severe cases of COVID-19. It is IgG antibodies in complex with heparin that induce HIT. One can hypothesize that IgG complexed with the spike protein and PF4 is the complex that induces VITT in response to mRNA vaccines. It has in fact been shown experimentally that the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein binds to PF4 [157].

PPAR-α, Sulfatide and Liver Disease

Two paragraphs are worthy of your attention.

As we have already stated, an experiment by Mishra and Banerjea (2021) demonstrated that the spike protein induces the release of exosomes containing microRNAs that speciﬁcally interfere with IRF9 synthesis[50]. In this section we will show that one of the consequences of suppression of IRF9 would be reduced synthesis of sulfatide in the liver, mediated by the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPAR-α).
…
Multiple case reports in the research literature describe liver damage following mRNA vaccines [165-167]. A plausible factor leading to these outcomes is the suppression of PPAR-α through downregulation of IRF9,and subsequently decreased sulfatide synthesis in the liver.

As you can see, there is a prediction here, and plenty of room to investigate.

Guillain Barre Syndrome and Other Neurological Conditions

This is worth reading. There is a laundry list of neurological conditions clearly attributed to the vaccine, and a clear mechanism by which they happen.

Bell’s Palsy

A known problem which appeared during the clinical trials of the mRNA vaccines.

Placebo 1, Treatment 7. Do the math.

Myocarditis

Signals and mechanisms are discussed. Particularly compelling is the proposed role of exosomes in carrying the toxic spike to cardiac tissue.

My money is still on migrating vaccine, but AND LOGIC will do for now.

Considerations Regarding the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

The underreporting of the system is discussed, with some doubt about the commonly cited figure of “100X” underreporting, as well as mention of a more sophisticated figure of 31X obtained by Rose.

VAERS Signal for Immune Suppression, Thrombocytopenia and Neurodegeneration

A comparison of the data from COVID vaccines to ALL OTHER VACCINES COMBINED is made, and the results are impressive.

Many different things are listed. It’s worth looking at.

VAERS Signal for Cancer

After detailing the numbers for cancer (nice table), where the mRNA vaccines have HUGE numbers compared to all other vaccines combined, this statement:

This cannot be explained by reference to a disproportionately large number of people receiving an mRNA vaccination in the past year compared to all other vaccinations. The total number of people receiving a non-COVID-19 vaccination is unknown, but over the 31 years history of reports VAERS contains it is unquestionably many orders of magnitude larger than the number receiving an mRNA vaccination in the past year. Overall, in the above table, twice as many cancer reports to VAERS are related to a COVID-19 vaccination compared to those related to all other vaccines. That, in our opinion, constitutes a signal in urgent need of investigation.

To me, this is enough to say that the mRNA vaccines are related to cancer. Period.

Discussion

This is worth reading:

There has been an unwavering message about the safety and eﬃcacy of mRNA vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 from the public health apparatus in the US and around the globe. The eﬃcacy is increasingly in doubt, as shown in a recent letter to the Lancet Regional Health by G¨unter Kampf [215]. Kampf provided data showing that the vaccinated are now as likely as the unvaccinated to spread disease. He concluded:“It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.”
In this paper we call attention to three very important aspects of the safety proﬁle of these vaccinations. First is the extensively documented subversion of innate immunity, primarily via suppression of IFN-α and its associated signaling cascade. This suppression will have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to eﬀectively combat future infections. Second is the dysregulation of the system for both preventing and detecting genetically driven malignant transformation within cells and the consequent potential for vaccination to promote those transformations. Third, mRNA vaccination potentially disrupts intracellular communication carried out by exosomes, and induces cells taking up spike mRNA to produce high levels of spike-carrying exosomes, with potentially serious inﬂammatory consequences. Should any of these potentials be fully realized, the impact on billions of people around the world could be enormous and could contribute to both the short-term and long-term disease burden our health care system faces.
Given the current rapidly expanding awareness of the multiple roles of G4s in regulation of mRNA translation and clearance through stress granules, the increase in pG4s due to enrichment of GC content as a consequence of codon optimization has unknown but likely far-reaching consequences. Speciﬁc analytical evaluation of the safety of these constructs in vaccines is urgently needed, including mass spectrometry for identiﬁcation of cryptic expression and immunoprecipitation studies to evaluate the potential for disturbance of or interference with the essential activities of RNA and DNA binding proteins.

This is what I was talking about at the beginning. There is enough here for an enormous amount of productive research on the downside of these vaccines. It’s EASY RESULTS. Maybe not easy grant money, but plenty of easy CLOUT when it’s all over.

This does NOT go back in the toothpaste tube.

Conclusions

Presented in whole:

It is imperative that worldwide administration of the mRNA vaccinations be stopped immediately until further studies are conducted to determine the extent of the potential pathological consequences outlined in this paper. It is not possible for these vaccinations to be considered part of a public health campaign without a detailed analysis of the human impact of the potential collateral damage. It is also imperative that VAERS and other monitoring system be optimized to detect signals related to the health consequences of mRNA vaccination we have outlined. We believe the upgraded VAERS monitoring system described in the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study, but unfortunately not supported by the CDC, would be a valuable start in this regard [208].
In the end, we are not exaggerating to say that billions of lives are at stake. We call on the public health institutions to demonstrate, with evidence, why the issues discussed in this paper are not relevant to public health, or to acknowledge that they are and to act accordingly. Until our public health institutions do what is right in this regard, we encourage all individuals to make their own health care decisions with this information as a contributing factor in those decisions.

That’s where I’m at. Do not take the clot shot. Do not give it to your kids. Tell people how you honestly feel.

I am OK with people having the freedom to take a bad vaccine, but I personally think that coercing anybody in the slightest to take it, is a CRIME.

If you’re scared of getting or giving COVID, there are far better ways to deal with it, than a bad vaccine that does a lot of damage.

Can the mRNA Vaccines Be Fixed?

That’s MY question.

I suspect that they CAN be fixed, but not for at least several years – maybe 5-10, if we’re lucky.

Until then, they should be taken off the market, IMO.

Hopefully antigen vaccines will do better, but if they don’t, we can fall back to treatment and “real” immunity.

Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

wolven

noun

Of or pertaining to wolves; wolflike; wolfish.

Used in a sentence:

Adjectives for wolf include wolfish, wolfless, wolflike, wolfly, wolfy, wolven, wolvish, wolfed, wolfing, wolved and wolving.

(If you can find a better one, please add it to the comments!)

ENJOY THE SHOW

W

Five* Studies Showing the Potential or Actual Superiority of Disease-Conferred Immunity in COVID-19

*And One Study Showing How Much of a SCAM Fauci’s Beloved Remdesivir Actually Was

The old wisdom of science and medicine, from when I was a kid, has never been disproved. Stated simply:

Disease-conferred immunity in the recovered is always superior to any form of vaccination.

This is why, when we were kids, most scientists and doctors were “unimpressed” by the idea of moving to vaccines for the three main childhood diseases, which diseases themselves provide LIFELONG IMMUNITY against three illnesses that are MUCH ROUGHER on adults.

Why go to a lesser immunity? The diseases are mild in children. The outcomes are excellent. The immunity is SOLID.

Now you can push around the edges of this generality, and find examples where individuals DON’T get good immunity from a “first case” of a disease, and catch it again, whereas some other person gets life-long immunity from a vaccine. Nonetheless, the generality holds at the statistical level, and has always held, because it is LOGICAL.

The whole point of vaccination is to provoke a SUFFICIENT DEFENSE by a LESSER ASSAULT than the disease being prevented.

Thus, for the generality of the old wisdom to be violated, logic, math, and basic biology have to be overturned.

Which is not hard with Democrat minds.

Democrats want to believe things that are politically expedient but simply untrue. I wish I could say the same accusation cannot be leveled against our side, but I can’t. Nevertheless, I find that I can gently correct our side with actual scientific logic, whereas the other side demands “authority”, which they instantly deny to any person or organization that disagrees with them. It’s a solid defense, but it’s not a REAL defense.

In any case, communism is “politics as religion”, and thus it can lead to articles of hope and faith that are held in violation of common sense and widely agreed simple facts – even the most basic science that can be proven at home by anybody.

Thus, the much more solid and honest wisdom of 1960s and 1970s medicine and science began to disappear as the Soviets and Maoists began chipping away at it. By now, it’s in real trouble.

With the COVID hoax, I pretty much thought science was done for. Surprisingly, in the wake of the hoax’s general failure to convince EVERYBODY that up is down and vice versa, we are seeing more and more of the sheepish scientists and doctors who initially went along with things, turning around and disagreeing – although very gently – with the COVID madness.

I would like to show you SIX important points that are now known from scientific studies. You will not see the Bidenistas and Bidenazis trumpeting any of these.

What these points do, is basically show why we don’t need COVID vaccines, nor a particular bad drug called remdesivir.

Indeed, in my opinion, all of these things call into question the entire COVID response, and appear to make it some kind of scam – likely by the World Economic Forum.

I believe that the scam is for global population control, the latter meaning both control of people and control of reproduction.

I’ll explain that at the end, but a bit along the way, too.

PS – thanks to Wheatie for the above image, to RF121 for the link to 4 of these papers, and to Wheatie again for information about the Rockefeller Foundation censoring “misinformation” through Red Jen and Actor Vivek.

Six Points, To The Point

1 – Disease-conferred immunity appears to be 6.72 TIMES as strong as immunity from the COVID vaccines

2 – mRNA vaccines cause spike protein to begin circulating in the bloodstream almost immediately

3 – The antibodies raised by COVID vaccines show pre-existing “memory” immunity to COVID and the vaccines

4 – 99% of those infected by C19 show fast, specific, and effective (“robust”) antibody response

5 – For 2-shot vaccines, shot 1 needlessly elicits memory antibodies, but shot 2 dangerously elicits prompt antibodies

6 – Remdesivir does NOT work against COVID, but it does lengthen time in the hospital

OK, people. Let me break down THOSE items with fuller descriptions.

Six Points, Explained

1 – Disease-conferred immunity appears to be 6.72 TIMES as strong as immunity from the COVID vaccines

Yeah, gotta love those insignificant digits. SEVEN WILL DO – roughly.

This is from an Israeli study that looked at all the people getting infected right now. You will recall that almost all Israelis are vaccinated, yet all of a sudden, people are getting it again – which means that most of them have to be (and in fact WERE) vaccinated.

It turns out that, among the people who are getting COVID in Israel right now, are a few people who had it already – but VERY few of them. If you do the numbers, then it’s clear that catching the disease provides better protection than the vaccine. This is hardly unexpected – like I said – this was old school predictable knowledge back in the 1960s and 1970s.

Stated differently: “Catch a cold one year, you probably won’t catch it again next year, or the year after.”

COMMON. WISDOM.

The number may be a quibble – earlier estimates were actually HIGHER than a factor of 7. So this is a conservative estimate.

But let me repeat what I said. This is exactly what we expect from colds and flu bugs. EXACTLY.

Bottom line, they tried to take something that we already knew, and repackage it as something new and scary. Now, it’s easy to see that this was all about keeping and gaining power over us.

Ref 1 – https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-16-covid-infection-creates-real-immunity-vaccines-destroy.html

Ref 1 Archive – https://archive.fo/RsHxy

Ref 2 – https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/309762

Ref 2 Archive – https://archive.fo/lHQ7Q

2 – mRNA vaccines cause spike protein to begin circulating in the bloodstream almost immediately

This is actually one of FOUR papers cited in a frontline doctor organizational email, which was then explained in the now-famous video by Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi.

If you have NOT seen this video, you should watch it. If you have seen it, then what you will be reading here (the next 4 points) is what he’s talking about, but related more directly to each of the 4 papers.

The email that describes the 4 papers will be included as an appendix. It describes the significance of the 4 papers, but I am restating that significance in my own terms, here, from my own perspective.

In my opinion, this first point shows exactly why the mRNA vaccines are so problematic, and were never a good idea. Not only is there a ton of vaccine migration PROVEN by the Pfizer leaked documents – there is massive spike protein circulation in the bloodstream. This spike protein activity circulating throughout the body is clearly the cause of all the problems associated with the vaccine.

In my opinion, it’s not a mistake. I believe the manipulated purpose of the vaccines was in fact incremental population reduction by flushing very early pregnancies on a huge but statistically significant scale.

SHAME on you, WEFFEN SS ghouls.

Ref 1 – https://principia-scientific.com/four-new-discoveries-about-safety-and-efficacy-of-covid-vaccines/

Ref 1 Archive – https://web.archive.org/web/20210717172112/https://principia-scientific.com/four-new-discoveries-about-safety-and-efficacy-of-covid-vaccines/

Ref 2 – https://jamesfetzer.org/2021/07/letter-to-physicians-four-new-scientific-discoveries-regarding-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-covid-19-vaccines/

Ref 2 Archive – https://archive.fo/HdzvF

Ref 3 – https://tube.doctors4covidethics.org/videos/watch/7ca43fab-fa9d-46e6-ac7a-a0c739d9e277

3 – The antibodies raised by COVID vaccines show pre-existing “memory” immunity to COVID and the vaccines

This is a SMOKING GUN. What this means is that all the health authorities LIED to us about a lack of pre-existing immunity. The vaccines are immunizing people to something they are already somewhat or even completely immune to.

Read that again. “Asymptomatic cases” = “basically already almost completely immune”.

Remember early in 2020, when a lone, old, distinguished professor of immunology in Europe dared to publish online a STATEMENT (no way could he get it into a journal) that only pre-existing immunity could explain what we were seeing clinically with COVID-19, and his letter was then censored everywhere?

He is proven COMPLETELY RIGHT in this paper.

Now that we can carefully study new infections with COVID-19, it turns out that people are responding to the disease as “something they’ve seen before”. Yes – it’s THAT similar to the other weak beta coronaviruses.

As many have said, the disease was not actually novel. It was JUST NOVEL ENOUGH. Just novel enough, thanks to gain of function, to win the race for the seasonal best-seller. It’s like a new paperback romance that breaks no new ground as either literature or love-porn, but simply puts tiny tweaks on something everybody has seen before.

Fifty Shades of Nonfluenza.

I repeat. This was a WEAPONIZED COLD – a “new” cold – and THEY KNEW IT.

This was an ECONOMIC ASSAULT on the world. And likely by the World Economic Forum.

Which incidentally sponsored Event 201.

You FUCKERS.

4 – 99% of those infected by C19 show fast, specific, and effective (“robust”) antibody response

The point here was that EVERYBODY who gets COVID-19 – including those who barely have any symptoms or NONE AT ALL – get excellent antibody response – and they SHOW IT. The antibodies may go away, leaving the strong and effective MEMORY antibodies on standby, but the system is soon primed and ready to go.

Which then raises the question – in combination with the prior points…..

Wouldn’t most healthy people just want to get the DISEASE instead of the vaccine? They get better immunity, proven, even if they have ZERO symptoms.

We were SNOOKERED.

This goes back to something that the Fake News media and Fake Medicine CDC hid from us.

When antibody tests first became available, there was an apparent hesitation by authorities (particularly in blue states) to release results. HOWEVER, there were several “blooper” releases of information from hospitals and doctors – at least one of which was forced into disavowing their own prior statement.

What they were finding was double-digit numbers of people who already had antibodies to COVID-19. At that point, the antibody tests were SUPPOSED TO BE unique for COVID-19, and NOT for the prior beta coronaviruses. But yet, they showed antibodies for 30% of people or HIGHER. Later, authorities (including CDC) badmouthed the antibody tests as being flawed because they were picking up antibodies to “other coronaviruses”.

NOW it is completely possible to see what they were trying not to admit. Between prior exposure to both COVID-19 itself and strains of the other 4 weak beta coronaviruses, people were ALREADY IMMUNE.

OLD ANTIBODIES WORKED ON COVID-19.

You see what I’m saying? They would rather falsely “admit” that the tests were “not working”, than to truly admit that the tests worked TOO WELL, and most of us were already immune to COVID-19 to varying degrees. Why? Because that would eliminate the FEAR.

They reframed the PROTECTIVE cross-strain immunity as a test problem, rather than a natural immunity blessing.

It was all about the election. It was all about government control.

It was all a LIE and a HOAX.

5 – For 2-shot vaccines, shot 1 needlessly elicits memory antibodies, but shot 2 dangerously elicits prompt antibodies

This part is actually rather interesting. This is a point that Dr. Bhakdi makes late in his video. The first vaccine shot is NEEDLESS but HARMLESS. Well – more or less. Most people are actually IMMUNE TO THE VACCINE.

Yeah, I want you to read that again.

They can reframe reality – I WILL REFRAME IT BACK.

When you inject somebody with a needless vaccine to which they are already immune, the people simply have an immune response to the assault. Yeah, you can call it a booster, or whatever, but the point is that you have caused the immune memory to replay an old tape and pump out antibodies that work IN GENERAL on your new COVID strain. Vaccine. Whatever.

But the second injection, coming shortly thereafter, is potentially WORSE than NEEDLESS. With two injections, the first kicks up fresh antibodies to spike protein. The second infects YOUR cells and makes them a target of those antibodies.

This is why we saw all those people DIE after their second injection.

THEY. DID. NOT. NEED. THAT. SECOND. INJECTION.

Yeah, this will be a good fight in science – AND the courtroom.

Frankly, I think there need to be lawsuits here, for anybody who would have had a normal contraindication to a second shot, which IMO should have been ALL diabetics, cardiovascular patients, etc. In fact, many of those folks should not have gotten a first shot, because IMO the people that COVID didn’t kill in spring of 2020 were mostly immune, INCLUDING diabetics.

They didn’t need the vaccine. And the vaccine – especially the second shot – killed them.

And hey! If it had been ok to criticize vaccines earlier on social media and not get kicked off, we might have discovered this earlier, and saved a few lives! And dollars!

But no, we live in a fully Orwellian world, where Polish pink diaper that censors people telling the truth about vaccines gets AWARDS for protecting free speech.

Ref 1 – https://tennesseestar.com/2021/04/20/youtube-ceo-honored-with-free-expression-award-as-big-tech-silences-conservatives/

Ref 1 Archive – https://archive.fo/KYGch

6 – Remdesivir does NOT work against COVID, but it does lengthen time in the hospital

This is just “sweet revenge” as Ted Nugent called it. KARMA.

Now I have to admit that I was just as fooled as Trump on this. Fauci – what a scammer.

I saw in the very earliest results that remdesivir was WORSE than not working – it was removing people’s kidneys faster than COVID was. AYE-YI-YI. Bad stuff.

And yet Fauci had the BRASS ASS to go on national television and call remdesivir the “GOLD STANDARD” after that performance. Sheesh! Trust me – Trump saw it, too. This was CLASSIC “you have to show them”.

Admittedly, to some extent, this was “fighting the fear”, and you can see why the POTUS has to take part. But who was generating the fear?

Yeah. Much easier to see the controlling characteristics of the hoax NOW.

Anyway, scientifically, the problem is, there is no point in giving people an antiviral like remdesivir AFTER the virus has already created devastation. You have to deliver the antiviral EARLY – exactly like Dr. Zelenko realized very early on.

Doesn’t matter what KIND of an antiviral – even a piss-poor one, or an atypical one, like hydroxychloroquine, is going to WORK if it gets there EARLY. Late – it simply doesn’t matter.

Now the thing is, remdesivir has to be INJECTED. It could only be used in a HOSPITAL setting – or at least, so they said. I disagreed. People inject stuff in SUBWAYS. Let’s get SMART here.

Well, as a CHUMP HONEST SCIENTIST, my thought was, why not simply administer remdesivir early, by injection, at a lower and safer dose, on an outpatient basis, upon diagnosis? In the doctor’s office, or at a specialist. Nothing worse than a blood draw. Same time that people are being given hydroxychloroquine, or regeneron. It would actually WORK then.

WELL, you see, this paper does more than just prove that remdesivir doesn’t work. I proves WHY they never did the logical thing with it.

Administer it early and effectively, and you don’t SELL AS MUCH. Administer it late and desperately, and you sell a TON of it. And it’s expensive as HELL.

Oh. My. God. I was such a chump. I assumed they would do the right thing if they knew what that was.

The pharmaceutical industry, at this point, is CRAVEN. THEY JUST SELL PRODUCT.

Ref 1 – https://gab.com/rixstep/posts/106604239491038171

Rixstep
@rixstep
11h··
Trump 2020

Y’all remember how Fauci bullshitted Trump about remdesivir – how he lied about moving the goal posts? Helps if you know the full story about it, but here’s new evidence that the shit’s actually harmful.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2781959

Remdesivir, Survival, and Length of Hospital Stay in US Veterans With COVID-19

This cohort study assesses the association of remdesivir treatment with 30-day survival and length of hospital stay among US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19…

jamanetwork.com

View Link Feed

2 likes
1 comment
5 reposts

Ref 2 – https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2781959

Summary

In my opinion, it is now time to call this crap out.

This is one of the most needless vaccines ever – one of the worst outcomes for a vaccine ever – no matter which one – and it is BECAUSE COVID-19 is fundamentally a case where there should not BE a vaccine for most people.

This is a case that was KNOWN not to be very amenable to a vaccine. It was only by a FEAR PSYCHOLOGY OPERATION that we were scammed into accepting the idea that we needed a really badly performing COLD VACCINE.

It’s a MONEYMAKER for industry – their PAWN MOTIVE – and a CONTROL AGENT for various levels of government – their PAWN MOTIVE. Ultimately, it’s about a global effort to gain control – most likely being mediated through the World Economic Forum, since almost all the guilty parties are either “partners” like Google/Alphabet or “organizations” like the Rockefeller Foundation.

Ref 1 – https://www.weforum.org/organizations/the-rockefeller-foundation

Ref 1 Archive – https://archive.fo/vDTby

And THAT is where we find the really basic motivation for the COVID hoax – as a PLATFORM of human control.

Once I realized that Bill Gates created Windows not as an operating system, but as a PLATFORM to change human behavior into a path he created, I realized the power of creating PLATFORMS. It’s a GOD THING.

WEF gets this concept deeply.

Ref 2 – https://www.weforum.org/platforms

Ref 2 Archive – https://archive.fo/YCE1S

You see, the mandatory vaccine platform is basically “The Island” where the entire planet is “The Island”. The people in control are liars, they can inject you with whatever they want, and they then have power of life and death over you, because they lie with impunity.

To start with, I believe the globalist scum are introducing a kind of limited, very incremental contraceptive.

Just like Bill Gates slipped and told us.

The Spike Protein’s Purpose Betrayed By Its Own Superiority

TL;DR – you MUST listen to a short podcast of a scientist revealing the latest research on the spike protein vaccines. The VACCINE ITSELF (not just the spike protein – the mRNA vaccine itself) is persistent and is not only concentrating in ovaries – THE VACCINE ITSELF IS EXCRETED – e.g., in breast milk. Meaning …

Is The Abortion Vaccine Right For You?

“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …

Spike Protein = Spike Protein ≈ Snake Protein

Using Principles of Protein Equivalence and Analogy as Predictive Tools for Coronavirus Understanding Surely you’ve heard of the BROWN RECLUSE SPIDER. The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that …

Now – if you followed that patent history work that Dr. David “Bowtie” Martin did on the coronavirus and vaccines, then you realize that they’ve been aware of the spike protein for TWENTY YEARS. Its CONTRACEPTIVE activities had to have been known – likely from before understanding of the spike protein per se, when coronaviruses were just viruses which caused potentially contraceptive symptoms in some patients.

This is a no-brainer, people. We have been manipulated.

W

Appendix: The Letter

Letter to Physicians: Four New Scientific Discoveries Regarding the Safety and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines

By Doctors for COVID Ethics

SCIENTISTS CONCLUDE THE BENEFIT OF COVID-19 VACCINATION IS “HIGHLY DOUBTFUL” BUT VACCINE INJURY IS “WELL SUBSTANTIATED”

Doctors for Covid Ethics has sent the following letter to tens of thousands of doctors in Europe, summarising four recent scientific findings critical to the COVID-19 vaccination program. The letter explains each finding as it relates to the biology of COVID-19 vaccines, including interactions with the immune system.

Taken together, the letter warns that these new pieces of evidence force all physicians administering COVID-19 vaccines to re-evaluate the merits of COVID-19 vaccination, in the interests of their own ethical standing, and their patients’ safety and health.

A video explanation of the underlying immunology by Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD is here, with German subtitles here.

Dear Colleague:

Four recent scientific discoveries are herewith brought to your urgent attention. They alter the entire landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic, and they force us to reassess the merits of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.

Summary

Rapid and efficient memory-type immune responses occur reliably in virtually all unvaccinated individuals who are exposed to SARS-CoV-2. The effectiveness of further boosting the immune response through vaccination is therefore highly doubtful. Vaccination may instead aggravate disease through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).

Discovery 1: SARS-CoV-2 spike protein circulates shortly after vaccination

SARS-CoV-2 proteins were measured in longitudinal plasma samples collected from 13 participants who received two doses of Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine [1]. With 11 of the 13, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was detected in the blood within only one day after the first vaccine injection.

Significance. Spike protein molecules were produced within cells that are in contact with the bloodstream—mostly endothelial cells—and released into the circulation. This means that a) the immune system will attack those endothelial cells, and b) the circulating spike protein molecules will activate thrombocytes. Both effects will promote blood clotting. This explains the many clotting-related adverse events—stroke, heart attack, venous thrombosis—that are being reported after vaccination.

Discovery 2: Rapid, memory-type antibody response after vaccination

Several studies have demonstrated that circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA antibodies became detectable within 1-2 weeks after application of mRNA vaccines [1–3].

Significance. Rapid production of IgG and IgA always indicates a secondary, memory-type response that is elicited through re-stimulation of pre-existing immune cells. Primary immune responses to novel antigens take longer to evolve and initially produce IgM antibodies, which is then followed by the isotype switch to IgG and IgA.

A certain amount of IgM was indeed detected alongside IgG and IgA in some studies [1,4]. Importantly, however, IgG rose faster than IgM [4], which confirms that the early IgG response was indeed of the memory type. This memory response indicates pre-existing, cross-reactive immunity due to previous infection with ordinary respiratory human coronavirus strains. The delayed IgM response most likely represents a primary response to novel epitopes which are specific to SARS-CoV-2.

Memory-type responses have also been documented with respect to T-cell-mediated immunity [5–7]. Overall, these findings indicate that our immune system efficiently recognizes SARS-CoV-2 as “known” even on first contact. Severe cases of the disease thus cannot be ascribed to lacking immunity. Instead, severe cases might very well be caused or aggravated by pre-existing immunity through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE, see below).

Discovery 3: SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of disease severity

Serum antibody profiles were reported for 203 individuals following SARS-CoV-2 infection [8]. 202 (>99%) of the participants exhibited SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. With 193 individuals (95%), these antibodies prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection in cell culture and also inhibited binding of the spike protein to the ACE2 receptor. Furthermore, CD8+ T-cell responses specific for SARS-CoV-2 were clear and quantifiable in 95 of 106 (90%) HLA-A2-positive individuals.

Significance. This study confirms the above assertion that the immune response to initial contact with SARS-CoV-2 is of the memory type. In addition, it shows that this reaction occurs with almost all individuals, and particularly also with those who experience no manifest clinical symptoms.

The goal of the vaccination is to stimulate production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, but we now know that such antibodies can and will be rapidly generated by everyone upon the slightest viral challenge, even without vaccination.

Severe lung infections always take many days to develop, which means that if the antibodies generated by the memory response are needed, they will arrive on time. Therefore, vaccination is unlikely to provide significant benefit with respect to the prevention of severe lung infection.

Discovery 4: Rapid increase of spike protein antibodies after the second injection of mRNA vaccines

IgG and IgA antibody titres were monitored before vaccination and after the first and the second injection of mRNA vaccines [3]. Antibody titres rose with some delay after the first injection, then plateaued, but rose again very shortly after the second injection.

Significance. Even though the antibody response to the first injection is of the memory type, the small time lag after the injection may mitigate adverse reactions, because the abundance of spike protein on the cells in the blood vessel walls and in other tissues may have already passed its peak when the antibodies arrive.

The situation changes dramatically with the second injection. Then the spikes are produced and protrude into the bloodstream that is already swarming with both reactive lymphocytes and antibodies. The antibodies will cause the complement system [9,10] and also neutrophil granulocytes to attack the spike protein-bearing cells. The possible consequences of all-out self-attack by the immune system are frightening.

Antibody-dependent enhancement of disease

As described, memory-type immune responses ensure the rapid rise of antibody titres after initial exposure to SARS-CoV-2, rendering the benefit of vaccine-induced antibody response exceedingly doubtful. Regardless, we should not assume that high antibody titres against SARS-CoV-2 will always improve the clinical outcome. With several virus families—in particular with Dengue virus, but also with coronaviruses—antibodies can aggravate rather than mitigate disease. This occurs because certain cells of the immune system take up antibody-tagged microbes and destroy them. If a virus particle to which antibodies have bound is taken up by such a cell, but it then manages to evade destruction, it may instead start to multiply within the cell. Overall, the antibody will then have enhanced the replication of the virus. Clinically, this antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) can cause a hyperinflammatory response (a “cytokine storm”) that will amplify the damage to the lungs, liver and other organs of our body.

Attempts to develop vaccines to the original SARS virus, which is closely related to SARS-CoV-2, repeatedly failed due to ADE. The vaccines did induce antibodies, but when the vaccinated animals were subsequently infected with the virus, they became more ill than the unvaccinated controls (see e.g. [11]). The possibility of ADE was not adequately addressed in the clinical trials on any of the COVID-19 vaccines. It is therefore prudent to avoid the danger of inducing ADE through vaccination and instead rely on proven forms of treatment [12] for dealing with clinically severe COVID-19 disease.

Conclusion

The collective findings discussed above clearly show that the benefits of vaccination are highly doubtful. In contrast, the harm the vaccines do is very well substantiated, with more than 15.000 vaccination-associated deaths now documented in the EU drug adverse events database (EudraVigilance), and over 7.000 more deaths within the UK and the US [13].

ALL PHYSICIANS MUST RECONSIDER THE ETHICAL ISSUES SURROUNDING COVID-19 VACCINATION.

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Notes

1. Ogata, A.F. et al. (2021) Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. -:x-x

2. Amanat, F. et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces functionally diverse antibodies to NTD, RBD and S2. Cell -:x-x

3. Wisnewski, A.V. et al. (2021) Human IgG and IgA responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. PLoS One 16:e0249499

4. Qu, J. et al. (2020) Profile of Immunoglobulin G and IgM Antibodies Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin. Infect. Dis. 71:2255-2258

5. Le Bert, N. et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature 584:457-462

6. Grifoni, A. et al. (2020) Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 181:1489-1501.e15

7. Gallais, F. et al. (2021) Intrafamilial Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Cellular Immune Response without Seroconversion. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27:x-x

8. Nielsen, S.S. et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of disease severity. EBioMedicine 68:103410

9. Magro, C.M. et al. (2020) Docked severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 proteins within the cutaneous and subcutaneous microvasculature and their role in the pathogenesis of severe coronavirus disease 2019. Hum. Pathol. 106:106-116

10. Magro, C.M. et al. (2021) Severe COVID-19: A multifaceted viral vasculopathy syndrome. Annals of diagnostic pathology 50:151645

11. Tseng, C. et al. (2012) Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One 7:e35421

12. McCullough, P.A. et al. (2021) Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection. Am. J. Med. 134:16-22

13. Johnson, L. (2021) Official Vaccine Injury and Fatality Data: EU, UK and US.

Why Your Insurance Company Will Force You To Take Gene Therapy

Cholesterol-lowering success in monkeys using CRISPR gene therapy has scientists hot to trot for human trials

You may not realize it yet, but if you think the phony war over cholesterol ON YOUR PLATE was bad, wait until you see what’s coming. The war over cholesterol production IN YOUR GENES is about to ignite.

Yes. YOU are going to be FORCED by your medical insurance to get GENE THERAPY, because they won’t want to pay for statins or stents.

Nobody has told you about this stuff, just like nobody told you that human fertility was going to take a hit from a phony Chinese pandemic with a gonad-seeking mRNA vaccine, containing a fertility-decreasing spike protein, and possibly some kind of tracking mechanism, although we’re not 100% certain on the last and least damaging of those three – at least not yet.

I CAN tell you that magnets DO NOT stick to COVID swab sites (AS IF!). What I cannot tell you is that you or your children will definitely be able to have children, if you got an mRNA vaccine for COVID-19.

But all THAT is another story. Back to cholesterol.

**Cholesterol gold foil artwork available on Etsy: www.etsy**.com

Cholesterol has a beautiful structure, if you have an appreciation for that sort of thing. It’s not just a FAT – it’s a STEROID. It’s a big blob of molecular wood putty that can be used for all kinds of things. The structure is remarkably similar to some of the most potent hormones in our bodies.

Yeah, sometimes there is a lot of SCRAP cholesterol laying around. But look at wood prices now, and realize that – yeah – cholesterol is part of HEALTH and BUILDING STRONG BODIES.

Let’s not get into how phony the whole demonization of cholesterol is. THAT is another story. But let me tell you – if there was ever an “unjustified fat shaming”, it was the WAR ON CHOLESTEROL.

The point is, we all know how many of us were forced onto a class of drugs called statins to lower our cholesterol levels. These drugs have a variety of serious side effects, including memory loss and dementia.

And yet doctors went along with the MANDATORY nature of doing something about cholesterol. Am I not right? Of course I’m right, and you know it. Your doctor was TRAINED to be all “mandatory” about fixing your cholesterol.

Well, there is going to be something that will eliminate the need for statins.

GENE THERAPY.

Brought to you by globalists, the Bidenistas, the Bidenazis, and the Phony Plannedemic.

Trust me, they KNEW THIS WAS COMING when they released the virus.

They KNEW they would use the “gene therapy” vaccines for the phony villain pandemic.

They KNEW they would go after cholesterol FIRST, because they had already set it all up.

They KNEW all this all along.

And now let me prove it to you.

There is an amazing article – excellent reporting – that you need to read. I’m only going to give you PART of it, so that you go see the rest. Or just go there now.

LINK: https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/gene-therapy/One-time-CRISPR-hit-lowers-cholesterol-monkeys/99/i19

Here is the first part, if you want to stay here and be tempted.

MORE: https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/gene-therapy/One-time-CRISPR-hit-lowers-cholesterol-monkeys/99/i19

NOW – if you want to see whether ANYBODY thinks this might be a bad idea, you have to actually go to the end of the article. But you will also see that there are some of these people who are RARIN’ TO GO on gene therapy in humans.

The therapy’s efficacy in monkeys shows it is ready to be deployed in people, Urnov says. “At this point, only clinical data will tell us what the real promise of this approach is.”

Oh yeah? Not all agree!

Permanently disabling it with CRISPR may therefore have unforeseen effects, he says. “When you do the CRISPR, you’re stuck,” he says. “What’s the antidote?”

Bigger still, is this problem.

THE SAME HORRIFYING ISSUE that was just found with the mRNA vaccines, and I just discussed in the previous post, is mentioned by a critic of the technology in the C&EN article.

So again, I urge you to read the full article, to understand how CLOSE we are to mandated gene therapy.

W

References

Cholesterol Gold Foil Artwork:

https://www.etsy.com/listing/216244142/cholesterol-molecule-gold-foil-print

C&EN article on gene therapy success with monkeys and cholesterol:

https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/gene-therapy/One-time-CRISPR-hit-lowers-cholesterol-monkeys/99/i19

No New Bioweapon Under The Sun

OK – we’re going to have some fun here – but stick with me, and you could learn A LOT.

Cue the music! Borrowed from Wheatie!

Previous posts helped put both the SPIKE PROTEIN DISEASE and the SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE into deep perspective.

We were seeing that the SOLUTION was a significant part of the PROBLEM, and that CDC was engaged in LYING, BLAME-SHIFTING, and HIDDEN AGENDAS.

And now the SCIENCE is coming out, and we were RIGHT.

We’re WINNING.

Another post discussed how – for whatever reasons are quietly embedded upon the length of the full spike protein and fragments thereof, chimeric or not – we are also now cursed with what appears to be, to some [currently socially tolerable] extent, an abortion virus and abortion vaccines.

Trust me – THAT is a trumpet that BRINGS DOWN WALLS.

We may even have a scientifically sound explanation for the craziest reports of vaccine side effects in the close but unvaccinated – namely, hormonal activities that are operating at the low microgram level.

Oxytocin – abortion dose = 10-30 IU = 16-50 mcg

Let me explain how that works. Think “DUST”.

I can tell you all about the potency of carfentanil. ONE BREATH of inhaled dust containing a tiny amount of it knocked me out like a roundhouse to the left jaw. If that ENTIRE DUST had been carfentanil, I would have been DEAD. But there was a fraction – a tiny fraction – of that tiny grain you see right there, that got into my lungs, riding on OTHER DUST, and I was OUT LIKE A LIGHT.

NOW you understand the POWER of the spike protein.

Yes, there is SO MUCH that they HIDE FROM US to maintain POWER OVER US.

However, now I want to put ALL of this virology technology into DEEP PERSPECTIVE.

**“Black goo” biological agent in the movie Prometheus, part of the “Alien” franchise.**

What I am going to tell you is almost certain to shock you – both about the disease and about the vaccine. It shocked me. That’s why I figured I had to explain this to people.

And what’s even WEIRDER – this is not totally about the disease or the vaccines, but also about their CONTEXT, which forces you to SEE them both differently and more CLEARLY.

A while back, I was just browsing the “edutainment” about viruses on the internet, when I was led down an interesting rabbit hole of viruses in entomology. You know – INSECTS. I read something on Wikipedia which bothered me, so I set it aside. It all seemed FAR too familiar. It surely impacted all this crap we’re going through now – I just wasn’t sure how. Later I came back and read it again.

Now, I understand. It’s actually rather beautiful. But – well – it’s interesting.

The greatest point being – THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN.

The great irony of the idea “nothing new under the sun” is the self-referential part – the idea that EVEN this little bit of wisdom is with certainty not even attributable to its first alleged “author”, who HIMSELF surely understood the great irony of his saying it, and that others might attribute it to him, someday.

Nothing new under the sun. This bit of Solomonian passed-on wisdom about the curation rather than creation of wisdom is far truer than I realized. Let’s EXPAND just a bit.

The idea that this universe is as old as it appears to be, and that in all that time, Einstein was the first person (using the term rather broadly) to discover the logic of how speed actually works, strikes me as a violation of Solomon’s logic about “first discovery” being rare as hen’s teeth.

Likewise, Solomon’s logic goes further and tells me that “hen’s teeth” undoubtedly happened a lot more often than, when in its earthly rarity, it happened “here and almost now”, but seemingly only roughly once.

Rarity being somewhat relative, with distance providing a deceptive but effective cover for number and frequency, all of them together being a control of wisdom over knowledge.

Yet even these seeming corollaries of the idea of “nothing new under the sun” are just repeats of the idea with some frill on the edges enlightened for our benefit.

“…it is curiosity that gives meaning and savour to life.”

LIFE. Seems to be part of the design. No?

Have I BOTHERED you yet?

Maybe even a bit of trepidation – or even FEAR?

Good. THAT has happened before. “Nothing new under the sun.”

You can never go wrong with Solomon.

The Last Time Gene Therapy Was Reinvented

I keep trying to tell people – DNA is very smart. We are slowly learning how to talk to it. Sometimes we actually listen. Sometimes we even plagiarize.

DNA bargains and wheedles its way into the future, changing in whatever ways it has to, to keep itself alive. It gains as much vision of the future and the past that it can, using proteins, to persist as well as it can.

Think of it this way. DNA fights and feuds with DNA, but who wins in the end?

DNA.

NOTHING that these foolish young humans are trying to do with their coronaviruses, their “vaccines”, and their “gene therapy” is new to DNA. DNA came up with ALL of this stuff – AGAIN – at least 100 million years ago. THAT was its destiny. Ironically repeating like its own form.

I am absolutely serious. The technology of EVERY one of our wonderful new coronavirus vaccines (or “injections” or “gene therapies”, if you prefer) was RE-invented by DNA approximately 70-100 million years ago on this planet, and is still around.

ONE example of a prior reinvention of gene therapy resides in a tiny biological war-game where THREE organisms cut a deal that keeps them all alive. I will point out all of the “original versions” to you, and you will see where human science basically plagiarized.

One of the three organisms is an insect – a kind of wasp – that gravitated into using a living host for reliable reproduction. The second is a voracious plant-predatory host insect – a caterpillar – that needs a dependent predator to keep its numbers in steady balance, because it won’t do it itself. The third is a virus that found a way to survive by helping insure that the host-guest “life transfer” process always succeeded, so that it, too, would survive.

DNA uses ALL OF THEM to optimally persist.

The key to understanding all of this, is a kind of virus called a “polydnavirus”. I personally like to pronounce that “Poe-LID-na-virus”, even though that is wrong. They’re actually supposed to be called “Polly-D-N-A-virus”. My advice is pick whatever you like – you’re probably never going to have to say the word publicly – and on the internet, your canine pronunciation is always perfect.

Or just call them PDVs.

Wikipedia’s entry for them is an excellent place to start.

LINK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polydnavirus

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/YHP7V

The bottom line is very simple. The wasp lays its eggs INSIDE a caterpillar by injection. However, instead of injecting a mere venom along with the egg – a kind of chemical weapon – the wasp injects a venom containing a VIRUS – a biological weapon. The virus provides biological effects like immune suppression that HELP the wasp egg survive, hatch, and grow. This is much more efficient than merely injecting, say, immunosuppressive proteins in the venom. The immune suppression by the virus prevents immune response by caterpillar cells known as hemocytes.

All of that is shown in the following graphic.

Here is one of the first really fascinating aspects of these polydnaviruses. When they are in the wasp, they are actually PART of the wasp genome. That’s right. They’re IN THE WASP’S CHROMOSOMES. The virus is now PART of the wasp’s genetics. One could even view it as the wasp sending PART OF ITS OWN GENES into the host, to make sure that the egg survives.

When the virus is still inside the wasp, it only comes out of the genes and reproduces in one place, in FEMALE wasps, near where the eggs are formed. It doesn’t harm the wasp, because DNA is NOT stupid. Viral DNA learned – the hard way – don’t shoot the pilot. Just stay in your seat until it’s time to debark. Wasp DNA learned – the hard way – let the jihadists sleep until we get to the airport we want them to shoot up. All of it mediated through the most annoying code in the world, with zero comments and nearly inscrutable, almost accidental language.

You remember those “well, it works” phone calls, coders. “I don’t know. Try this.”

Now – the next point is even cooler – because it’s the exact same strategy as the coronavirus vaccines that use viral vectors (e.g., Johnson+Johnson, Oxford/AstraZeneca, Sputnik V).

The infection does not lead to replication of new viruses, rather it affects the caterpillar’s immune system, as the virion carries virulence genes instead of viral replication genes.^[4] They can be considered a type of viral vectors.^[5]
Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polydnavirus#Biology

The virus particles that are sent into the caterpillar are NOT reproductive – they are merely infective. They don’t code for creation of new virus, which might reproduce exponentially and kill the host or use up too many resources. Instead, the infective non-reproductive virus particles – just like the coronavirus vaccines – give a nice, predictable amount of expression of new proteins, useful for the wasp eggs and larvae to prosper. The virus basically CONSERVES caterpillar so that it has a ticket and a ride OUT of the dead caterpillar when it’s all over.

That’s the EXACT same strategy as our mRNA and DNA vaccines. Don’t crank out too much spike protein, by cranking out any new virus, and thereby kill the host. The main point is SAVING the host. The point may also be STERILIZING the host, to some extent, because THAT protein effect is beneficial to the injecting parasites known as the Democrat Party, globalist banks, and China. And probably more than one type of pencilneck. But they do want us to live – at least for some time, it would appear.

But seriously – the wasp polydnavirus immunosuppression strategy IS the human adenovirus vaccination strategy.

The only difference is what the proteins that are created DO. In the caterpillar, they suppress the immune system response to the egg or larva. In humans, the one protein stimulates antibodies to itself, and possibly does other things which are intended or not.

So you may be wondering how the virus gets from parent wasp to child wasp if the virus that is sent into the caterpillar host is not reproductive. AHA. It is because the virus is tucked into the GENOME of the baby wasp, safe and sound, for a ride into the future. The virus genome is essentially protected by the wasp.

LINK: https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-77-11-2873

Thus, you can see how genetic incorporation of the VIRUS benefits BOTH the wasp and the virus – and even – in a weird way – the caterpillar. The wasp gets to control the genetics and expression of the virus, so that they don’t cause the wasp too much trouble, but instead yield maximum benefit. The virus can then be more effective at its now exclusively delegated task of immune suppression in the caterpillar, by relinquishing reproduction to the wasp. Division of labor creates a great mutual dependency, but it also creates a strong contract.

One could say that genetic incorporation is a STRONGER CONTRACT between the virus and the wasp.

Just like genetic incorporation of COVID-19 spike protein could be a STRONGER CONTRACT of reduced human fertility.

But how does the caterpillar benefit?

The caterpillar is not going to live on as THAT particular caterpillar, but THAT particular baby caterpillar-culling wasp will live on in an assured 1:1 trade-off, and the REST of the caterpillars which benefit by the current culling will also live on as a stable population. The C-W-V balance is maintained BETTER by seeking a more stable chaotic resonance, without the wild swings of boom and bust, if wasp reproduction and population can be more closely tied to the caterpillar population, and they all live into the future without wild swings in numbers.

Another way to view it from the caterpillar perspective, is that viral efficiency minimizes the number of sacrificial caterpillars needed to keep the necessary number of wasps alive.

Now – we’ve seen viral vector vaccines analogous to the non-reproductive but infective polydnavirus virus particles – those would be the Johnson-+Johnson, AstraZeneca, and Sputnik V vaccines, which use adenoviral vectors for non-reproducing, protein-creating, virus DNA. But what about the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines?

Well, it turns out that these {{{wasps + viruses}}} invented ANOTHER way to get DNA or RNA into the caterpillar host – those are called VLP, for “virus-like particles”. There is a lot of range and variability here, just as there is in non-viral-vector vaccine technology. So in the same way that the Pfizer, Moderna and Inovio vaccines use proprietary “virus-like lipid droplet nanotechnology” to get their mRNA or DNA into human cells and thus cranking out spike protein, wasp/virus DNA can also use a strategy of “virus-like particles” that don’t even mimic non-working viruses, and STILL get their effective DNA transferred to the caterpillar, to effect the desired expression of needed wasp/virus proteins in the caterpillar.

Now – that is not to say that PDV (polydnaviruses) and VLP (virus-like particles) are the only tricks up the ovipositors of these parasitic wasps. It turns out that – in addition to these well-described DNA viruses, there are also apparently RNA viruses which ride along with wasp eggs during injection. So YES – both DNA and RNA “vaccines” are part of the wasp injections. And YES – there can be genetic incorporation in the caterpillar cells – for their short lifespan – just as there is already genetic incorporation, long-term, in the wasps.

Remember – who wins? DNA WINS. The HOUSE always wins.

But don’t forget Novavax! It may just be protein, but protein shills for DNA!

Not only are the Novavax “pseudo-viral protein-based nanoparticles” already examples of virus-like particles – they are matched by protein-based components of the wasp venom, both free-floating or otherwise. Indeed, one cannot read about the virus-like spiked particles in this wasp venom and not think that Novavax design is pretty much the same thing.

NOW – this is all a LOT to unpack. Not just that, but my “dumbing it down” probably made it just plain dumber. To correct that, I’m going to let the experts FIX THINGS UP.

The field of polydnaviruses in insects is NOT a huge field. It’s actually rather obscure, despite the phenomenal importance we are witnessing now. Just as the media can help those in power hype and control a field like climate science, or literally HIDE certain other fields like [[[ COUGH ]]], they can obscure still other fields which radically affect you, by hiding them pretty much in plain sight.

There is a BOOK that reviews the field, however, which is EXTREMELY helpful.

You can download parts of this book, and that includes TWO parts which are more than enough for a reasonably smart normal person to see the CONTEXT EXPLAINED.

Let me get ONE of those parts out of the way because you’re not going to be interested in this, unless you’re ready to get VERY nerdy on the history of science. But I am including it because it is AMAZING STUFF. You might view this as “The history of the science of the rediscovery of all the evolutionarily discovered technology used in the “vaccines” or “shots” or “gene therapy” of the coronavirus genetic injections”. It’s a beautiful window into HOW SCIENCE WORKS.

Foreword – The Discovery of Polydnaviruses and the Influence of Dr. George Salt

You can download a PDF of this at the linked page.

Now – if you read that – you will get a LOT, including a window into the slow and painful nature of research, but it’s a bit difficult to extract the good stuff if you’re not used to reading scientific review literature.

In contrast, the PREFACE of the book is MUCH easier to read, and it puts ALL this stuff in context that normal humans who are not experts in polydnaviruses can understand.

Preface – Parasitoid Viruses – Symbionts and Pathogens

I highly encourage you to read the full preface at the linked page. But what I’m going to do here is simply pull out all kinds of juicy quotes – which is damn near the whole thing. [ My comments ] and identified WOW sequences will be in bold.

Here we go – this is all quoting:

Among parasitoid viruses, the fascinating models of polydnaviruses (PDVs) were discovered in the 1970s and the new field of polydnavirology was thus opened.
This field has been moving very fast since the beginning of the century thanks to the use of genomic approaches and rapid expansion of accessible databases on insect and viral gene sequences.
Parasitoid and viral genomic studies have confirmed that PDVs are functionally gene transfer agents used by parasitoid wasps to manipulate the physiology of their parasitized lepidopteran hosts by introducing modified versions of their own genes into host cells.
In the case of PDVs from braconid wasps, this kind of gene therapy (detrimental for the patient, which is in this case the lepidopteran host!) originated from the integration of a virus genome in a wasp genome ca. 100 million years ago. [LOL – I just noticed this “being impressed by the date” part – looks like we BOTH realized this independently. -Wolf]
This virus has been modified to incorporate wasp genes instead of its own viral genome in the nucleocapsids inside the viral particles. [Minor beef here – ownership and original genetic penmanship on the payload could be more “virus” and less “wasp” – interesting problem.]
Such use of viruses as vectors has been selected several times independently during the evolution of parasitoid wasps. [There it is. VIRAL VECTORS. Invented by DNA.]
The PDVs associated with braconid and ichneumonid wasps (Campopleginae subfamily) are unrelated as judged from the machinery producing the particles, and they represent an example of convergent evolution with different viral origins.
A third association event is suspected to have occurred in the Banchinae subfamily of ichneumonid wasps. In essence, the parasitoids have ‘captured’ viral elements that have evolved a host regulatory role that benefits the parasitoid to facilitate successful parasitism. [This is more “archaeopteryx” on the payload being of viral origin.]
Other associations with viruses or virus-like particles might have evolved with different organisms but they have not been unraveled yet, and parasitic amoebae that have associations with mammalian viruses are just one example. [“Lots of room at the bottom.”]
Many insects have evolved associations with a large number of species of bacteria such as Wolbachia and associations with viruses have been less well studied to date compared to bacterial symbionts.
A number of different viruses are found in the genital tract of the parasitoid wasps and conceivably they could be transferred to female wasps by behavioral traits, such as host feeding, initiated following ovipositor puncture of the surface of the integument.
Host feeding may thus be an advantageous behavior for viruses which facilitates their spread within insect populations and this intimate association with viruses might have favored interactions leading in some cases to integration of viral sequences into the wasp genome, although most of the wasps described in this book are no longer host feeders.
These viruses include RNA viruses of insect parasitoids and most of them appear nonpathogenic. Could these likewise have evolved a symbiotic relationship with their host? Future research may reveal such an intimate relationship with the wasp host carrying them but, currently, we have little information about their functional role as symbionts or pathogens in the virus–wasp–insect host relationship. [This was in 2012 – the situation could be different now.]
While the study of polydnaviruses was initially inspired by the pioneering studies of George Salt and Susan Rotheram at Cambridge University, more recent studies of Venturia (formerly Nemeritis) canescens particles (the virus-like agent studied by George Salt) by Otto Schmidt and Sassan Asgari documented that these virus-like virions lack both DNA and RNA; the particles are comprised of proteins encoded by parasitoid genes. [This is basically virus-like particle nanotechnology akin to the Novavax vaccine.]
The multiplicity of different molecular forms seen in these viruses and virus-like particles is truly amazing but, compared to polydnaviruses, we have less information about the biology of virus-like particles and how they function. [There is clearly an infinitude of possibility here – clearly WHY the push for gene therapy.]
Finally, not all parasitoid species are associated with viruses and most in this category have to rely on virulence factors produced by their ovaries and venom glands instead of using the host to produce them like for PDV-encoded gene products. [Translation – most of the wasps use plain old venom.]
PDV-associated species also produce venom that was shown in some cases to synergize the effect of the virus. [Combination biological and chemical weaponry.]
New sequencing approaches are more comprehensive and will thus allow comparisons of the arsenal of proteins used in different species, which will enhance our understanding of the dynamics of evolution of parasitoid virulence strategies. [Big data will allow spying on the past to happen even faster.]
Ectoparasitic wasps have not been examined yet for the presence of viral symbionts, and appear to have exploited venoms as a source of host regulatory molecules instead. Comparative studies on paralyzing versus nonparalytic venoms are lacking, and screening ectoparasitic species for viral elements should also be a future research priority. [Translation: there’s more to learn from regular stinging / paralyzing wasps.]
In addition to enhancing our knowledge of parasitoid strategies and increasing our understanding of the importance of symbiotic relationships in species evolution, parasitoid viruses and venoms may constitute a source of new molecules to control insect pests. This might be a revolutionary outcome of research on PDVs and other parasitoid viruses, since the safety of many chemical pesticides with respect to their detrimental impacts on human health and key species in the environment such as bees and other beneficial insects, is questioned. [You think proteins are going to be safer? HA! Get ready for new problems.] We anticipate that harvesting biopesticidal molecules from parasitoid venoms will likewise prove fruitful. [Translation: All this human wasp techno coronavirus lying crap is headed to agriculture, and presumably already there. Yeah.]
Finally, we hope that this book will satisfy the reader by presenting an overview of the most recent findings on all these topics presented by an international assemblage of authors. [You can say that again!]
In addition, we aim to inspire many future researchers to choose polydnavirology or studies of other parasitoid viruses or viral-like elements and venoms as their focus field. [You’ve inspired me, even though it’s a bit late for me to enroll in one more Marxist university.]

That’s it.

I tell you – this whole thing was a revelation. Suddenly, everything these people in Big Pharma have been doing has been HUMBLED BY GOD, using BUGS. LOL! Pretty amazing.

And being humbled, all of us, the TRUTH now becomes clear.

Now – if all this seems a bit scary, but you’re thinking “Hey, this isn’t exactly like our case, in which Democrats mind-fracked their victims with an RNA virus” – well, HOLD YOUR BEERS. With God – IRONICALLY – all things are possible.

Yes, this, too – baffling the victim with an RNA virus – was borrowed from nature, although I am being just a wee bit facetious, since it was done much more intelligently and much more socially against a more intelligent and social species.

The Case of the Shanghaied Babysitter

Yeah, I’ll try to keep this one shorter, but I don’t really have to go back TOO MUCH to the original literature here.

Here is where I FOUND this case originally. An article that was COPIED onto a forum.

Parasitic wasp uses virus to control its host

LINK: https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/parasitic-wasp-uses-virus-to-control-its-host.332664/

The links back to this forum article are ALL bad, but I was able to google for correct ones. Here is the article in Discover Magazine:

Biological Warfare: Parasitic Wasp Uses A Virus To Control Its Host

Science Sushi By Christie Wilcox Feb 11, 2015 2:36 AM

LINK: https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/biological-warfare-parasitic-wasp-uses-a-virus-to-control-its-host

THAT article goes back to THIS scientific literature:

LINK: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2014.2773

This is actually a very long and complete scientific article. Let me give you the “TL;DR” version.

When the wasp lays an egg in the ladybug, it also injects an RNA virus. That virus makes the ladybug go “mask Karen” crazy, and stick around and GUARD the pupated larval wasp after it emerges from the ladybug and cocoons. The ladybug may then even kick the virus and go on living after the young wasp departs.

Yeah, let me HIGH FIVE that long-hauler ladybug.

Just sayin’.

Democrats.

SPIT.

SO – where are we now?

Is Phony Gene Therapy About Population Control?

We have now looked at the COVER PRESENT (coronavirus and vaccines), the EFFECTIVE PRESENT (spike protein virus and vaccines), the LIKELY DEEPER MOTIVATING PRESENT (contraceptive / abortive virus and “vaccines” that look pretty much like public “health” gene therapy), and the PURPOSED ORIGINAL HONEST PAST (infection and/or genetic modification of the injected to produce desired effects using RNA viruses and/or specialized viral vectors) – the latter insect past being a lot like what is happening now.

Are you ready for the FUTURE?

Well, there’s a lot of range on that. Maybe it’s THIS…..

Now I know a lot of y’all are, like me, saying “Yeah, that will be a cold day in hell!” But let’s consider it anyway. It helps to understand things.

WHY would Hillary say this, about Trump’s possible winning in 2016?

What crime could POSSIBLY send hundreds of historic conspirators to some horrible fate like what happened to the NAZIS? They would have had to have done something even more horrible – right?

Well, viewed in “holocaust” (small “h”) terms, an “abortion virus” followed by “abortion vaccines” might count.

It’s a pretty ingenious idea. If you honestly believe that overpopulation threatens the planet, and that stopping it “by any means necessary” is justified, then the idea of:

taking a modifiable cold virus but…..
don’t call it that, so people will be AFRAID
warm up the FEAR CROWD with SARS, Ebola, Zika, etc.
use a cold with its own moderate antiprogestogenic or oxytocin hormonal activity, or some other way of exerting a contraceptive or abortive activity
optionally increase that activity
release the virus
create vaccines with the same effect
require ongoing vaccines to titrate the effect on society

To me, this is very much like the wasp strategy, only instead of hijacking the juvenile butterfly with immunosuppressive negative gene therapy in a PRO-FERTILITY strategy for its own offspring, what the Democrats are doing is an ANTI-FERTILITY strategy using progestosuppressive negative gene therapy on basically all humans who are not in on the scam. And they also used an RNA virus to mess with our minds, though THAT was a bit artful, shall we say.

Now, I think the success or failure of their operation is going to depend on the ultimate level of contraception that is achieved here. The effect on society will depend on whether the Dems, globalists, and Chinese are trying to pull off a very steep and fast population drop that would generate a social immune reaction, or a long, slow, incremental one that would not. We probably won’t know this for several years.

But just consider this “back of the envelope” calculation.

Let’s say that Demmunists require 2 coronavirus boosters every year. Say that between compliance and effectiveness, ONE of those boosters is effectively pregnancy-blocking for any pregnancy currently in process. Run this over all of humanity, so that once every year, every woman is hit with a “menstruation and miscarriage vaccine” using the spike protein. With a pregnancy window of 75% of the year, that target is the broad side of a barn, as long as CDC continues to insist that it’s safe for pregnant women, or women who are trying to become pregnant. You would get massive observable menstruation and miscarriages after vaccination, and the plot would not last.

It’s not a SUSTAINABLE LIE.

BUT – as long as the effect is random, subtle, and single-digits, it can be hidden by a compliant scientific community, which is socially conditioned to reject the truth. Even bigger, control of social media, communications, and other avenues of discovering the truth, mean society can be kept completely blind to a subtle population control.

But seriously – reducing the fertility of humans by 5% is a BIG DEAL. It doesn’t mean it’s the end of it. It’s a GOOD BEGINNING – from their point of view.

You’ve got to look at this thing, like you’re trying to pull it off, to see that you really COULD pull it off.

And if we could pull it off, they will pull it off.

So – that’s where I’m at.

And if I’m right, they will NEVER FACE JUSTICE for what they’re doing.

So here is a rule about Democrats.

Democrats, China and other communists will always pick an unjust fait accompli over a just agreement.

Thus, as long as they do things where the price of tolerating their crimes is less than the cost of a civil war, they will just keep doing those things.

Something to think about.