Dear KMAG: 20220110 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / The Ethical Skeptic’s Elevator Pitch / Corbevax – The “Good” Vaccine That Snuck* Past The Criminals

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

U.S. President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump arrive for the 96th annual National Christmas Tree Lighting ceremony near the White House in Washington, U.S., November 28, 2018. REUTERS/Jim Young – RC1E6EA87210

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

Get your rest, Trumpy Bear! You’re going back to the White House!!!

I think this statement is one of the best political speeches ever! Thank you, Trumpismine, for alerting us to this gem!


Please Stand By For A Brief Interruption…..

*SNUCK – A Special Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day

Is it “snuck” or is it “sneaked”? DA WOOF was raised on “snuck”, more than likely because of his young hillbilly associates.

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary has a wonderful discussion of this point.

LINK: https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/snuck-or-sneaked-which-is-correct

Bottom Line:

TAKE YOUR PICK

FTA:

The original past tense of sneak was sneaked, following the pattern of other regular verbs. However, in the 19th century snuck started appearing, and is now the more common version for the past tense of “sneak.” Most irregular verbs become regular over time, but sneak has become irregular, and no other word like sneak (peek, creak, etc.) follows a similar pattern.

We shall return to our roots and use “snuck” as often as possible, but “sneaked” where it sounds better, like “sneaked a peek”.

We now return you to our regular programming.


The Business At Hand

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get through it, NO PROBLEM.


The Rules

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.

The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

I want to make TWO POINTS today.

POINT 1 – No Political Correctness (of Any Kind)

We shall endeavor to keep all forms of political correctness OUT of this place.

Even a hypothetical MAGA PC.

The idea that some things cannot be said “because MAGA” or “because Trump” is a non-starter. Don’t even.

THAT is a path back to BUSHISM and RINOism.

The utter banishment of PC is how we make sure that ALL “non-establishment voices” can be heard.

Political correctness always starts off with “we’re just asking you to be nice”, or, “we all believe this, don’t we?”, but it always ends up in censorship, because that is where it was ALWAYS HEADED.

You can use LOGIC, REASON, RELIGION, SCIENCE, and any other form of honest quarrel, even as simple as saying “I don’t like that”, but NOT political correctness.

PC is the most insidious infringement of free speech to ever exist.

And PC is not just a leftist thing.

A classic example from history is “You can’t criticize a sitting President during wartime.”

Where in the hell did THAT come from?

I would think that wartime is THE MOST IMPORTANT TIME for there to be criticism – even from people I absolutely can’t STAND (and I did like the Dixie Chicks, even when they were stupid as hell!)

Nope.

No idea, discussed honestly, truthfully, and with the agreed level of civility, is “beyond the pale”.

This site does not exist to protect certain ideas from examination. It exists to shine light into EVERY nook and cranny.

Thus, please don’t demand that certain topics or ideas be “off limits”, or declare that they are justifying of incivility.

Point 2 – Ignoring Those Who Disagree In Automatic Ways

People who disagree with your comments are simply part of this place, because of FREE SPEECH. You just have to put up with it. All viewpoints are subject to being countered in a civil fashion.

“Civil” does not necessarily mean that you will not be annoyed or frustrated by the reply or replies.

Feel free to offer to “agree to disagree”.

Now there are some people who don’t want to “agree to disagree”. They feel a kind of necessity to speak their mind – to state ALL disagreements, and to continue ad infinitum. Often this is religious, where the person believes that failure to disagree is a dereliction of moral responsibility.

This can get frustrating, if you feel that you HAVE TO RESPOND.

Because you DON’T HAVE TO RESPOND.

The best medicine for ad infinitum disagreements, even in moral duty, is to IGNORE THE REPLY. And I mean don’t respond in ANY way.

Do not demand that the other person “henceforth ignore what you say”, because that’s not part of free speech. YOU ignoring THEM is.

Trust me – when people see that you are not responding to somebody who “gets in the last word no matter what”, they are NOT thinking that this person “won the argument”. They think you have better things to do. AND YOU DO.

SO….. [ENGAGE BOILERPLATE…..]

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

Those who cannot deal with this easy requirement will be forced to jump the hoops of moderation, so that specific comments impugning other posters and violating the minimal rules can be sorted out and tossed in the trash.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

That includes the life skill of just ignoring certain other posters.

We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).

We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”


A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

You may also pray for our enemies, even Pantifa, who need a good prison ministry.


MUSICAL INTERLUDE

For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.

First – a little “commercial” music from a certain airline.

Well – one thing leads to another. A bit of island-hopping, and then back to Hawaii…..

OK – that’s enough of that. Give me some of that LUCINDA CHICK that Smiley turned me onto! Let’s try the same song LIVE.

Now just add some ELVIS COSTELLO, who shows up with everybody.

OK – let’s see who else we can hook up Elvis with…..

OK. Maybe a good transition.


Call To Battle

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Yup. MASS, GRAVITY, TIME and CONSEQUENCES THEREOF are most definitely a thing.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.


The Ethical Skeptic’s Elevator Pitch

You will recall LAST FRIDAY’S POST in which one of the topics was entitled:

ThEthSkep’s Big Fix of All Things Coof: CCP Hiding Chinese 2018 Release of SARS-CoV-2 Virus

This segment of the daily open covered a wonderful post (more like a “blog paper”) by The Ethical Skeptic, in which it is postulated (and to my satisfaction, demonstrated) that the Omicron variant is of a separate lineage from the Wuhan release and descendants thereof.

I had commented on The Ethical Skeptic’s post, that if he formulated an “elevator pitch” for his paper, I would trumpet it to the world.

WELL, HE DID!

Here is his “elevator pitch”, as well as the context.


WOO-HOO!!!

I got an “elevator pitch” from The Ethical Skeptic!!!

😍

The Ethical Skeptic(@theethicalskeptic)

Author

 Reply to  Wolf Moon

 2 days ago

Elevator pitch

“When one examines the complete 144-slot genetic profile of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, it becomes clear that its lineage is a full two years older than even the first Covid virus in Wuhan, China. Not only did this ancestor of Omicron cause an outbreak across the world in 2018 and 2019, that was mistaken as an 8-fold higher rate of flu across the Asia-Pacific-Africa for those years, but its genetics reveal a robust history of lab mouse serial passes and lab-edited alleles. This proving that its 2018 release as a less-deadly immunity-builder prophylactic virus, and the subsequent release of the more-deadly Wuhan variant two years later, both originated from a weapons-grade bio-lab in China.

China set up a red herring for the world to ‘discover’ at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its local seafood wet market, suggesting an unfortunate but understandable accident was being thinly concealed. Now, the problem for China is, that unlike all the other variants, Omicron stuck around for some reason, and is now spilling the beans on the whole sordid affair.”

TES 🙂


Now, let me repeat that in five pieces, with commentary in between.

But first, let me remind you, that this elevator pitch is NOT an abstract or a summary of the blog post. It is a small “explainer and convincer” that gives you the GIST of the proposition – enough to make you GET IT.

If you have just a few seconds to convince somebody that something needs attention, you need an “elevator pitch” – as in “I got on the elevator with the head of research, and finished my proposal right as she got off on her floor.”

Here we go!


When one examines the complete 144-slot genetic profile of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, it becomes clear that its lineage is a full two years older than even the first Covid virus in Wuhan, China.

In my opinion, it has been clear that EVERYBODY is surprised by the genetic divergence of Omicron from the original Wuhan strain, as well as all the other descendants thereof. How in the HECK did that happen?

Well, it gets worse. It turns out that Omicron or its close ancestors have been around since about the time we first started looking at SARS-CoV-2.

It is NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE that this virus is a product of mutation of Wuhan.

Something stinks.

Well, what TES has done, is to look closely at the genetics, and come up with a VERY plausible explanation of them, which ALSO explains many other interesting facts – particularly in the 2018-2019 timeframe.


Not only did this ancestor of Omicron cause an outbreak across the world in 2018 and 2019, that was mistaken as an 8-fold higher rate of flu across the Asia-Pacific-Africa for those years, but its genetics reveal a robust history of lab mouse serial passes and lab-edited alleles.

This matches up with many facts from 2018 and 2019, as well as my belief that China was actively engaged in some kind of shenanigans with the SARS outbreak of 2003.

China, in my opinion, has not only been LEARNING from secret and public accidental viral releases – it has been engineering many intentional releases for DECADES.

I think now is a good time to accept the following.

NOTHING that the CCP says should be believed or disbelieved. What they say is irrelevant, except as evidence of possible deception, criminality, and lies. Treat CCP or proxy statements as evidence from criminals – nothing more.

Example: https://www.theepochtimes.com/china-the-manipulation-of-data-and-the-biggest-lie-in-modern-history_4196857.html/

NOW – here is something interesting.

Here is a perfect example of Chinese scientific disinformation and Sun Tzu subterfuge.

LEARN from the ChiComs.

Chinese scientists (who may or may not believe what they are saying, because of omnipresent CCP infiltration, influence, control, and monitoring of all Chinese scientists) submitted – almost exactly 1 month after TES posted his work – a paper that is essentially COVER-UP of the evidence of mouse genetics in the lineage of Omicron which was revealed by TES.

The first link explains the paper in layman’s terms. The second link is to the paper itself.

LINK: https://basedunderground.com/2022/01/07/new-research-appears-to-confirm-that-omi-con-came-from-mice-indicating-likely-laboratory-origins/

PAPER: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8702434/

What’s really SMART about this ChiCom “fix” is that they’re using Didier Raoult’s work concerning minks as a pretext here. This is a VERY typical Chinese science-spy suck-up technique.

Had I not worked with a bunch of Chinese and Russian spies for decades, being completely on guard for their bullshit, and yet having fallen for it a few times in spite of that experience and suspicion, I would not appreciate just how EXTREMELY GOOD they are at doing this stuff.

They will WEAR YOU DOWN WITH THE SUGAR and then SLIDE THE KNIFE IN when you can’t possibly see it.

And I ain’t sayin’ CIA CHICKS are bad, either, if you know what I mean.

What can I say? This is just like the horrible Zhang paper “proving” masks “work”, which was then used by American Democrat politicians to justify their mask policies used in their electoral coup of Trump.

Science is no longer free of OMNIPRESENT DECEPTION. Treat it accordingly.

I simply cannot emphasize this enough.

The CCP has no respect for “global” science. NONE. They use it – abuse it – and destroy it – all in the name of holding power. All those who trust the CCP, or the people it manipulates and influences – including many American governmental and organizational leaders – are going to get BURNED.

Likewise, if you automatically treat the science that CCP touches as “real”, be prepared to stumble.


This proving that its 2018 release as a less-deadly immunity-builder prophylactic virus, and the subsequent release of the more-deadly Wuhan variant two years later, both originated from a weapons-grade bio-lab in China.

The beauty of this explanation is not only that it explains the genetics, but that it explains many facts which we observed. TES has a good run-down, but in general, the “pre-COVID almost-COVID bugs” that people observed WERE IN FACT SOMETHING.

I think the real question is how much HELP China got on “our side”.

This is straight out of modern Chinese warfare – to strike an enemy in such a way that the enemy does not even understand THAT they have been struck. By using a prior release as a vaccine, the Chinese avoided all blame for a second release on their own soil.

This is brilliant warfare.

This fully comports with a tactic that the ChiComs absolutely love – which is to publicly “anticipate” a warfare capability that they ALREADY OWN AND USE IN BATTLE.

You will notice that by later in 2021, a few of those infamous “Chinese colonels” began to engage in a kind of “wolf warrior braggadocio” over the idea that China had won a great biological warfare victory over the West, by virtue of their superior “response” to COVID-19, and thus that biological warfare needed to be a key part of *FUTURE* Chinese war-fighting strategy.

Do NOT be fooled by this.

What this means is that China is already using biological warfare – and has been for some time. When Chinese colonels do this stuff, it is a psychological operation.


China set up a red herring for the world to ‘discover’ at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its local seafood wet market, suggesting an unfortunate but understandable accident was being thinly concealed.

Again, the TES proposition explains so much about the multi-layer Chinese release cover-up, and all the subsequent, pre-calculated, pre-arranged back-pedaling.

First, there was bat soup.

Then there was no bat soup, but plenty of blame of racism. Clearly the work of the racist but infinitely self-hoaxing CCP.

Then I think it went to pangolins, and that was where I just started rolling my eyes. Smart people started believing blood samples (H/T Linda).

The Red Cross said it was definitely in America in December 2019.

Until somebody else proved October 2019.

And then the Italians proved it was prevalent in Europe in September 2019.

Again, the TES theory is perfect, explaining how the earlier “protective” viruses did a “long march” across Asia, thereby protecting China in a “mid-term practice run” of sorts – working out all the bugs, so to speak.

It just fits too well. Sorry, China.

AND – of course – this explains why the CIA and Twitter and the cut-out group “DRASTIC” created a double-down on a lab escape, conveniently proffered by a media that pilloried Trump for the same ideas, but realized that their “concession” would get Trump’s supporters to buy into a late release accident, to prevent them from seizing upon the highly explanatory idea of a two-stage release operation.

REALLY. They’re so easy to understand now.

Now, the problem for China is, that unlike all the other variants, Omicron stuck around for some reason, and is now spilling the beans on the whole sordid affair.

So – I have to ask – what is “some reason”?

Aubergine believes that the Omicron mildness is by White Hat design, and I almost have to agree.

Or perhaps there’s a bit of “AND” logic here.

Wouldn’t it be hilarious if the American military identified Omicron precursors in old blood samples, realized the actual viral timelines, realized that Omicron was a “remnant” of the Chinese pre-Wuhan “vaccine strain”, and essentially RE-DEPLOYED THE CHINESE VACCINE STRAIN as Omicron, in some fashion, at some time?

What this means is that instead of finding and using a racially selective bioweapon, which will inevitably be achieved and used by these racist CCP goons, but is still *possibly* a bit out of reach, the ChiComs worked with what they had on hand – a chronologically and geographically and immunologically selective BINARY bioweapon.

And yet – well – it’s blowing back a bit now. In more ways than one.

Interesting times just got more interesting.


Corbevax – The “Good” Vaccine That Sneaked Past The Criminals

I’ve already been pimping this crap online and IRL, and I have offered some opinions already, but now I’m ready to give you all a real run-down on it.

Here is my latest “pimp job” on The Gateway Pundit, on an article about some poor Israeli teenage girl who got killed by ONE INJECTION of the “clot shot”…..


WOLFM00N 2m

Any pro-vax out there who are even thinking of vaccinating your kids – WAIT FOR CORBEVAX.

  • no mRNA or cDNA
  • no full spike protein
  • no nanolipid technology
  • no Pfizer, Moderna, Wuhan or China involved
  • non-profit, developed by Texas vaccine expert Dr. Peter Hotez
  • professor of pediatrics at Baylor (yes – a pediatrician)
  • patent-free – anybody can make it
  • made in India (right now) – very cheap

Google “corbevax hotez” and get more information. This is an RBD subunit protein antigen vaccine – meaning it works around almost every WRONG THING that was done on purpose in the current vaccines in order to PUSH technology. This is an old-school vaccine.

If you’re hesitant, wait for a few months of results. The Phase III trial was good (zero serious side effects), but we all know better – a million doses have to go out before you really know how safe these things are.

IMO, the only safer vaccine would be this exact same type by nasal delivery.


SO – TMI – information overload for sure.

What did I say? Some safer vaccine?

YES – let’s start from the beginning now.


First, a hat tip to TheseTruths for a link to some OANN coverage of this new vaccine.

LINK: https://www.oann.com/texas-scientists-roll-out-patent-free-covid-19-vaccine-protein-based-corbevax-has-no-mrna/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/KxPPk


FTA:

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 10:26 AM PT – Wednesday, January 5, 2022

Texas scientists rolled out a new COVID-19 vaccine, saying it’s patent-free and can be produced by any manufacturer in any country. The vaccine, called Corbevax, was developed by the Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine.

It has successfully passed human trials as safe and effective. The new treatment is based off protein-based technology that has been used in other vaccines for decades and it does not use MRNA.

India has already authorized production of 100 million doses per month of the new vaccine. Meanwhile, Texas scientists say not-for-profit vaccines will help defeat COVID-19 quicker.

“We, about 10 years ago, started making coronavirus vaccines and the irony is that all of our processes are used with that in mind,” explained Professor Peter Hotez, M.D. Baylor College of Medicine. “We build in low cost processes from the beginning because our health economist that we’ve collaborated with have always said if you don’t make it for under a few dollars a dose, you might as well not make it at all. So that’s all we know how to do, is make low cost vaccines.” 


The irony here is rich. You can already tell by the price – this is the UBUNTU (Linux) of coronavirus vaccines. And yet, it has somehow managed to get the blessings of organizations owned by BILL GATES.

Yes, Hotez had to let Pfizer and Moderna go first, but I still find it amazing that Hotez got this vaccine past the wicked Bill Gates during his own lifetime.

Almost makes me wonder if Hotez got some help from his anti-vaxx enemies, putting pressure on the various CLOT SHOTS.

Hmmmmmm……

Yes, Professor Hotez actually DESPISES Sharyl Attkisson over the autism issue, and used to savage her on Twitter. Not sure if he’s blocked her, but I would not be surprised.

AND YET – well – just listen to him.

You heard him. The only leftist buzzword that Hotez left out was “sustainability”. It’s very clear that he knows how to do the university PC bullshit walk, and yet – this guy may end up saving millions of “Deplorable” lives, with a “plain Jane” vaccine that could actually have BENEFITS exceeding RISKS.

Let’s look at more coverage.

Here is a fluff piece written by HOTEZ HIMSELF and his colleague, Maria Elena Bottazzi, in good old super-wokester SCI-AM.

LINK: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-covid-vaccine-for-all/


Opinion

A COVID Vaccine for All

With proved technology and no-frills tech transfer, CORBEVAX is poised to reach hundreds of millions in the coming weeks

December 30, 2021

AUTHORS

Peter J. Hotez is a professor of pediatrics and molecular virology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he co-heads the Texas Children’s Center for Vaccine Development. He is the author of the newly released book Preventing the Next Pandemic: Vaccine Diplomacy in a Time of Anti-Science (Johns Hopkins University Press).  Follow Peter J. Hotez on Twitter

Maria Elena Bottazzi is co-director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development. She is also a professor of pediatrics and molecular virology and microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine and associate dean of its National School of Tropical Medicine.


I must STRONGLY recommend reading the ENTIRE ARTICLE, which is short and easy to understand.

It is absolutely DRIPPING with VAXZI NARRATIVE and PC BUZZWORDS – and yet one gets the sense that the entire project is planned, positioned, and poised to BRING DOWN THE CLOT SHOTS. Or perhaps just to race right past them, as they self-destruct.

FTA (buzzwords and key points emphasized BY ME):

Two years into the pandemic, CORBEVAX is the first COVID vaccine designed specifically for global health. It is a milestone for global vaccine equity, something we believe will overcome vaccine hesitancy, and serves as a blueprint for how to develop a potent vaccine for pandemic use in the absence of substantial public funding.

The vaccine prototype was first developed by scientists at Texas Children’s CVD and Baylor before it was licensed, with no patents or strings attached, to Biological E. Limited (BioE).

The central government of India has already ordered 300 million doses. And BioE, the company manufacturing the vaccine, plans to produce 100 million or more doses per month starting in February. Approximately 150 million doses have already been produced and are ready to roll out. In addition to what the company is supplying to India, BioE plans to deliver more than one billion additional doses to other countries.

What this means is that CORBEVAX will soon vaccinate more people than vaccine doses donated so far by the U.S. government or any other G7 country.

This new COVID vaccine has several distinct features that make it particularly suitable for use in resource-poor settings: it is safe, effective and can be locally produced at very high quantities. CORBEVAX is easy to store and inexpensive. We hope it will be used in low- and middle-income countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America, where vaccine availability has generally been abysmal.

CORBEVAX is made using technology that has been employed worldwide for decades, meaning that manufacturing processes are generally already well-known and won’t require a steep learning curve like the one needed for the scale-up of new technologies such as mRNA, adenovirus and protein particle vaccines.

CORBEVAX is made through microbial fermentation in yeast, similar to the process used to produce the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine that many resource-poor countries make and employ. This will allow for local manufacturing of COVID vaccines similar to CORBEVAX. Texas Children’s CVD and Baylor have already licensed the COVID vaccine technology to companies in Indonesia and Bangladesh and have licensed it for production in African countries such as Botswana. Such vaccine technology and licensing agreements, together with co-development partners, represent the ideal example of how COVID vaccines can and should be produced locally and widely in countries in the Global South.

Like the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine that comes from the same technology, CORBEVAX has an excellent safety profile. In a phase 3 trial conducted in India, CORBEVAX produced mainly mild adverse events, making it perhaps one of the safest COVID-19 vaccines in use.

When compared with doses of the AstraZeneca–University of Oxford vaccine manufactured by the Serum Institute of India, CORBEVAX also produced a higher amount of neutralizing antibodies against the Delta and Beta variants of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID (We expect to have Omicron data soon.) And it provided more durable and lasting protection. The vaccine neutralized variants of concern in laboratory animal studies and was highly protective in two nonhuman primate challenge trials. The trial results are being prepared for submission to a peer-reviewed journal.

As a recombinant protein vaccine developed from the receptor biding domain of the spike protein on the virus’s surface, combined with Dynavax Technologies’ CpG 1018 adjuvant with alum, the Texas Children’s CVD COVID vaccine can be stored using simple refrigeration. And like the hepatitis B vaccine, this COVID vaccine has one of the lowest costs of any available to date. No patents have been filed on the vaccine technology, and Texas Children’s CVD is assisting and co-developing the vaccine alongside BE and other vaccine producers in the Global South, which helps keep the cost low.


There is a research paper cited in the text, from Hotez and company, which shows that this is strong recombinant tech – it is NOT a rushed product.

Genetic modification to design a stable yeast-expressed recombinant SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain as a COVID-19 vaccine candidate

LINK: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304416521000519


Now you all may remember me talking about a German vaccinologist named Winfried Stoecker, who tried to develop and promote a very similar RBD vaccine – and who was shut down immediately by Angie The Dung Cow and her Green Shirts.

RBD_Regional_Antigenic_Vaccine_quadrupol-Mutante-3.png
RBD_Regional_Antigenic_Vaccine_quadrupol-Mutante-3.png

So why is Hotez positioned to vaccinate the world, and Stoecker remains OUT LIKE A CHUMP?

In my opinion, it’s because Peter Hotez plays their game and embraces the narrative with an almost perverse zeal and delight.

How perverse?

LINK: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/08/04/baylor-prof-urges-criticisms-of-fauci-and-other-scientists-prosecuted-as-hate-crimes/


YES. THIS is the ASSHOLE TROLL who suggested that criticism of Fauci should be a HATE CRIME.

And he did it in the scientific literature, too!!!


LINK: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001369

PDF: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001369&type=printable


In my opinion, this guy is like a “reality” version of the angry white faux-tranny Titania McGrath – a troll so perfect that it has to be real, or reality so SPOT-ON that it becomes a troll.

Peter Hotez is so authentically in compliance with the narrative, that he holds power over the hypocrites who force it on everybody else.

Thus, Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci are forced to go along with their own narrative, by this bow-tie bozo – this three-mask martinet of mandate over-compliance.

Don’t worry – this move away from the clot shot serves the agenda of Gates and Fauci, by covering their rear ends when the heat is on. The super-villains are not stupid, and did not rise to their levels of control by allowing guys like Hotez to be anything but a “parachute” of sorts, if their private jets catch fire.

Still, how did Hotez pull it off?

In my opinion, going to INDIA was the key move. India understands the precarious position they are in, thanks to CHINA JOE in the White House. India telling Pfizer to talk to the hand, and also backing off on trumpeting the virtues of ivermectin, are BOTH in my opinion connected to an exit via the Hotez vaccine.

HOTEZ had to know that INDIA was his key to getting HIS VACCINE produced.

INDIA had to know that HOTEZ was capable of bailing them out from the CLOT SHOT.

INDIA understood that HOTEZ was donating them a money-maker to gain leverage on the CLOT SHOT.

HOTEZ understood that INDIA needed an easy break to steal influence from CHINA.

Both HOTEZ and INDIA knew that BILL GATES, CHINA and BIDEN were weakened by CLOT SHOT blowback, and were not in a position to keep the murderous ruse of the CLOT SHOT going.

The HOTEZ VACCINE could be delayed at first, but it could not be stopped, because CLOT SHOT problems would eventually make it impossible to delay or stop any other reasonable vaccines.

All in all, a beautiful chess game of scientific leverage.

So who wins?

In my opinion – GOD.

Matthew 18:6

But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.

Peter Hotez is very clear about the pediatric possibility of this vaccine. No matter what, I think he REALLY wants to help kids. If his vaccine isn’t “Clot Shot, Jr.”, then I think he may just do that.

We anticipate people will readily accept CORBEVAX and similar recombinant protein COVID vaccines, including for pediatric use. And clinical trials in children are also underway in India. Parents may even be more willing to accept CORBEVAX than vaccines made with a newer technology. If there was ever a COVID vaccine that might triumph over vaccine hesitancy and refusal, we believe this could be the one.

Is this vaccine better than simply catching the disease? We’ll see.

After what Pfizer, Moderna, Fauci, Gates and Biden have done, I trust NATURE more than vaccines. But I also “trust” some vaccines more than others.

I HOPE that THIS one – Corbevax – may be the new “gold standard” of coronavirus vaccine safety.

Additional References:

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/india-approves-corbevax-here-s-all-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-covid-19-vaccine/ar-AAScPB4

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/12/28/unpatented-shot-dubbed-worlds-covid-19-vaccine-wins-emergency-approval-india


Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

spanker

noun

On a square rigged ship, the spanker is a gaff-rigged fore-and-aft sail set from and aft of the aftmost mast. (Wikipedia)

The swinging, pole-controlled, triangular or quadrilateral sail or sails at the back end of a sailing ship. (Wolf)

The word has other definitions related to spanking (slapping or striking on the back end) that we will set aside for the moment.

Used in a sentence:

Our wonderful flag flew from the spanker of the Lady Washington.

Used in a picture:

https://historicalseaport.org/lady-washington-history/

Used in a video:

In the process of finding this video – passing over videos about – well – you can guess – I found THIS one, from Australia. The title is misleading – designed to get clicks and subscribers.

It’s worth watching to see the good and the bad of the Australian spring this last October.

Suddenly, I’m glad I’m in America.


ENJOY THE SHOW

Have another great week!

W

DEAR KAG: 20220107 – The Pub is OPEN / TES Special Edition / Pimp Your Coof Kit / Dealing With Uncertainty / ThEthSkep’s Big Fix of All Things Coof: CCP Hiding Chinese 2018 Release of SARS-CoV-2 Virus

The Pub is OPEN!

Yeah, we still have staffing problems, but who doesn’t under China Joe?

While off to a rocky start, we are staying open as many days of the week as possible, just like some of the small businesses that I patronize.

Keep up that LOCAL PRESSURE on the Biden cabal by going to school board meetings and supporting TRUE non-monopoly capitalism – it SKEERS Kapo and Little Red Jen somethin’ FIERCE.

Likewise, patronize those SMALL BLOGS that provide new viewpoints and ideas!


We Serve Whiskey And Guns To Indians Here!

Yup! FREEDOM is GOOD TROUBLE, and we’re in favor of it, for everybody, much to the consternation of our local maskies and vaxxies.


I had the special pleasure of being “refused service” by a maskie recently – he simply walked away from the cash register and went into the back. Some of it was due to race. Having been “not served” because of race before, I can spot that fairly easily, and this person was not exactly “hard to read”.

Three other staffers (all forced to wear masks, sadly) came to my assistance and took my order.

I maintained a pleasant demeanor, as part of one of several psychological warfare tactics that I have adopted recently, in fighting against the VAXZIS and MASKZIS.


While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.

So what’s on the ODD BAR’S CRAZY MENU this week?

We’ve served alcohols our first week, including menthol, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine.

Next, we served amines , including second generation antihistamines.

Today, we’ll toast each other with an element that we’ll borrow from Steve…..

…..and some very special natural alcohols and derivatives, including among the 4 of them, 3 terpenoids, 2 phenols, 1 ester, and 1 ether.

More on these wonderful “liqueurs” later!


Christmas Spirit

There’s still time to spread omicron! GET BUSY!!!

While we do have some members out with Omicron now, including Brave and Free, the real question is whether we’re going to see a big peak in March and April, like we did in 2020.

And if you’re gonna get sick, you might at least consider having some willing cohort, looking for that natural immunity, to get sick with you!

thank you
thank you pictures

Ah, thanks to SMILEY for reminding me of the goofy fun of these wonderful but stupid GIFs called “Blingees”!

And now, the rules of the pub.


HOUSE RULES

God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.

Now, back to business.


AMEN!


Current Art On The Wall

Now for something a bit different…..

Vector background. Molecules and chemical formulas

…..and something a bit more familiar.

David Teniers the Younger (1610–1690), The Alchemist, ca. 1643–45. Oil on panel, 20 1/8 x 28 in (51 x 71 cm). Herzog Anton Ulrich Museum, Braunschweig (139)

LINK: https://www.metmuseum.org/blogs/now-at-the-met/2020/alchemy-science-making-marvels


TES Special Edition

As one of the early “discoverers” of The Ethical Skeptic on Twitter, I was happy that I was able to get a few people interested in his precise and well-considered thoughts on things – especially regarding the phony scamdemic. TES was always utterly perturbed by the bad science of the “pandemic”, and worked on a daily basis to “correct the fact checkers” – which was all of hilarious, sad, and joyful.

After I was kicked off Twitter, I rarely saw him, due to my own laziness, really, but in 2021, some GREAT links to The Ethical Skeptic’s work popped up here. THANK YOU, to all who follow him and keep us informed.

THIS was a classic.

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2019/03/07/nelsonian-inference-and-cultivated-ignorance/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/wZKYb

This work really helped me to GRASP and understand the leftist tactic of “pretending not to know”, and – more importantly – how to spot it.

So let’s look at some of his even more recent stuff.


Pimp Your Coof Kit

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/12/29/our-household-covid-kit-item-listing/

This one got us all thinking about “coof kits”, and GA/FL suggested some of us putting up our own versions. I initially thought that this might not be a good idea, because people’s needs and medical situations really VARY – one of the main reasons that “practicing medicine without a license” is actually a bad idea in normal times. I thought it better to have a broader discussion.

However, I just realized that I did put up a kind of “minimal” kit last week, and it’s worth looking at it.

This kit was designed for people who DON’T have a smart plan already figured out, and don’t want to investigate “hard to find” things like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

Here is what I had, followed by my earlier reasoning. The main change is adding Vitamin C, as discussed below.


Wolf’s COVID Care Package

  • Thermometer (thermal digital is easiest)
  • Antigen test kit(s) (yeah, good luck finding one, although they are coming back after New Years)
  • Antihistamine of your choice (Claritin, Zyrtec, and Allegra are the easiest – 1-2 a day)
  • Aspirin (regular, or low-dose if your stomach doesn’t like it – 1 a day)
  • Listerine or Betadine mouthwash/gargle for mouth and throat
  • Vitamins C and D, Zinc, Calcium, Magnesium, Multivitamin including Selenium.
  • Quercetin (including natural sources) or Green Tea
  • Saline or other nasal spray, rinse, or wash of your choice

The thermometer tells you when to use your precious test kit – when you suddenly have a fever and a sore or tingly throat.

The test kit gets you a positive diagnosis that opens doors for things like antibodies, or an official test.

A positive test means you can BEGIN TREATMENT at THERAPEUTIC DOSES.

The antihistamine insures that YOU WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY NOT DIE, because it stops the second, allergic, inflammatory stage of COVID in its tracks.

The aspirin makes doubly sure you won’t get clots, but be careful – don’t take it if you’ve had trouble with aspirin. Talk to your doctor if unsure.

The gargles (Listerine or Betadine) massively reduce viral load and speed time to recovery.

The saline and nasal washes lower viral load, and maintain nasal breathing.

The quercetin and green tea help zinc’s antiviral action by increasing cellular zinc levels.

The vitamins and mineral supplements keep you at antiviral levels of these things. In particular, zinc and vitamin D3 need to be at non-deficient levels.

Please consult authoritative sources from TRUE medical doctors like the ones at https://flccc.net.


Cthulhu noted that I hadn’t mentioned Vitamin C – I have now added that, because it’s likely to help and can’t hurt (“First, do no harm”) and also follows the McCullough Principle (“Signals of Benefit, Acceptable Safety”). I don’t think it’s nearly as important as the antihistamine and “clot-blocker”, but I do have to admit that Vitamin C was certainly far better than nothing when I survived Wuhan with only mild lung damage.

What I’m going to do now is to encourage all of YOU to talk about your “war chests” and “coof kits”, and explain your reasonings about things.

This will help people who are deciding what THEY might want to add to their kits – OR REMOVE, if there is something better for their particular situation.

Remember – everybody has their own unique medical needs.

I will put my thoughts in the comments, just like everybody else.

NOW – about those natural “essential oils” in Listerine.

Let’s look at them.


Menthol


Thymol


Eucalyptol (2 views)


Methyl salicylate


These are all natural substances of roughly the same molecular size and composition (mostly carbon and hydrogen with 1-3 oxygen atoms), all of them being either pungent oily liquids or smelly, vaporous crystalline solids.

There are some relations between these things.

Thymol is basically menthol where the 6-membered ring has been made benzenoid – meaning like benzene – with 3 double bonds.

Notice that methyl salicylate is also benzenoid. Methyl salicylate is related to aspirin, and has similar activities. Don’t drink Listerine, even though the amounts are (believe it or not) rather small.

Eucalyptol is also structurally related to menthol, although it’s harder to see. Try to see it.

All of these natural substances, when isolated from their sources, were very early pharmaceuticals. They ALL have pharmacological activities, which many would regard as “primitive” by today’s standards, and yet, gargling Listerine is PROVEN to be extremely effective in reducing viral load of COVID-19 variants – about 80% as effective as iodine solutions.

Why might this be? Here is just ONE small line of immunological evidence.

LINK: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9810029/

To be honest, we’re a bit late to the game here. Native Australians from the first wave of immigration, roughly 65,000 years ago, discovered the utility of eucalyptol by their own investigations.

LINK: https://successfulaffiliateru.com/medicinal-use-of-eucalyptus-the-australian-aboriginal-way/

Here is some additional information about early Australian medicine using natural products.

LINK: https://theconversation.com/the-art-of-healing-five-medicinal-plants-used-by-aboriginal-australians-97249

There is a great picture of what is essentially a native doctor’s medical bag in the second link. When it freaks you out a bit, let it. This is a way of getting you to appreciate human intelligence outside your modern experience.


Lastly – IODINE.

I have not tried this, and I am not sure I would like it, but it’s a viable option, IMO. I actually like Listerine, and it worked for me on delta, so I’m happy with that. I did NOT try Listerine in the nasal cavity. Not sure that I’d like that. I stuck to saline.

I did find a paper that showed Listerine to be roughly 80% as effective as povidone-iodine.

Here is link to a review which states something similar, and a summary of the review.

LINK: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7842245/


Executive summary

Methods

  • A review of literature was conducted regarding the use of commercially available antiseptics and SARS-CoV-2.

Results

  • Povidone-iodine (betadine), ethanol and essential oils (Listerine) and a combination of xylitol and iota-carrageenan (purified from red marine algae) were shown to reduce viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro by 3–4 log10 in 30 s.
  • Chlorhexidine, a widely used oral rinse, does not act as quickly in reducing viral load in 30 s as povidone-iodineI, but binds to cell proteins, extending protection.
  • Hydrogen peroxide is not as effective as other oral rinses in vitro and cell toxicity is a concern.
  • Hypertonic saline is not directly virucidal, but halts replication by increasing hypochlorous acid inside the cell.

Conclusion

  • Several commonly used nasal antiseptics and gargles have shown efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and clinical trials are currently underway to study their impact on disease course and transmission.

Future perspective

  • These commercially available products should be further evaluated due to their potential ability to reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses that are yet to emerge.

You can also make your own povidone-iodine gargles and nasal rinses – Dr. McCullough has retweeted a nice recipe for this. Click through to Twitter for more information.

Here is a great long post on all of these methods, including hydrogen peroxide – an alternative to iodine.

LINK: https://jeffreydachmd.com/2021/09/povidone-iodine-mouth-wash-rinse-gargle-for-c0-ld-prevention/

Do beware that some people need to be careful with iodine, including people with hypothyroid.

LINK: https://www.webmd.com/diet/foods-high-in-iodine#1

LINK: https://www.webmd.com/vitamins/ai/ingredientmono-35/iodine


Dealing With Uncertainty

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/12/24/the-riddle-of-certainty/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.ph/wpfWu

This is another GREAT article, talking about one of my FAVORITE complaints about modern science, which has resulted from a really SICK and UNHEALTHY compartmentalization, as well as insulation of scientists from internal criticism (lack of “herd review”). This condition has allowed all sorts of pathological science to gain ascendancy without check, balance, or proper community criticism.

For example, CLIMATE CHANGE gets more input from FINANCIERS than it does from the many scientists like me who think we are acting irrationally and presumptuously on ERRORS. These errors have been induced by the WRONG forces – beneficiaries not committed to truth – within a small pathologically influenced community – much like what’s going on with improperly influenced government science and the “clot shot”.

This piece by The Ethical Skeptic contains a graphic using a BULLSEYE which you really need to see. It makes a very important point about science – which I can apply DIRECTLY to Anthony Fauci.

Fauci’s extreme focus on antibodies to the spike protein as a nearly sole measure of “success” of the “clot shot”, is a perfect example of what TES is talking about.

I have referred to Fauci’s over-focus as “antibody hypnosis”. In fact, I see this kind of obsession and compulsion repeatedly throughout his career, and would wager that:

  • it’s why he always “wins” against the Judy Mikovitses and the Kary Mullises
  • it’s why he’s so highly paid
  • it’s why he’s tied to so many “grim reaper” experiments
  • it’s why corrupt industry loves him, and is in bed with him

TES makes a general point about the kinds of information which actually provide STRONGER PROOF – and this set includes something I love – INDEPENDENT CONFIRMATION BY ALTERNATE LINES OF REASONING – not just “duplication of results” and “confirmation of results” – which are both sadly lacking as well, but not nearly as important.

I have powerful, direct experiences in science with the need for RESOLVED DIVERSE INPUTS and AVOIDANCE OF HYPNOTIC REASONING as safeguards against pathological science.

However, THEY (and I mean “they”) are using various forms of hypnosis, including MASS, COMMUNITY, PEER, and INDIVIDUAL to advance science in ways that THEY want.

Human science is far more controlled than we either admit or understand.

Anyway, back to the article.

There is a quote from Elon Musk therein which is really worth your while, and which TES puts in the context of what he is talking about.

Bluntly, it feels wonderful to know that SOMEBODY GETS IT.

What Musk is talking about here is basically the “bullseye” metaphor that TES uses. And THAT is related to the following item.

While Fauci is very committed to the LEVELS of his antibodies, he has not properly processed feedback that would indicate he’s OPTIMIZING THE WRONG THING.

Here is a link to Steve Kirsch’s interpretation of Sucharit Bhakdi’s and Arne Burkhardt’s analysis of people who died after vaccination, showing that these deaths were ALMOST ALL related to the “clot shot”.

LINK: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/bhakdiburkhardt-pathology-results

Kirsch REALLY explains this well. Malone takes note of this, too.

IMO, it would appear that Fauci is optimizing the WRONG ANTIBODIES in the WRONG WAY, because the vaccines are CREATING the WRONG ANTIBODIES in the WRONG PLACES.

Please read Kirsch’s article and then the Bhakdi-Burkhardt paper to understand this.

PAPER: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/end-covax.pdf

Now, Fauci may be optimizing the wrong antibodies in the wrong places for a variety of reasons. Those exact reasons are not nearly as important as the fact that they are simply WRONG.

I believe Bhakdi, Burkhardt, and Kirsch – this is a risky vaccine, and now we begin to understand WHY.

Based on this knowledge, I personally will not be taking these vaccines.

In my opinion, these results CLEARLY show that vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 should not be effected by IM injections of a full SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and even more emphatically so, NOT by genetic vaccines delivered by IM injections. In my very early opinion, this is going to be a CLASSIC case for using RBD antigen (protein) and/or nasal delivery as a concession to the virus – with nasal delivery being used as a SAFETY feature and NOT merely a convenience.

To have SAFER vaccines for DISCRIMINATING SHOPPERS like me, we’re going to have to compromise with the virus. That’s just the way it is.

There may be SOME who thought that we could arrive at a compromise that would reduce human populations, but frankly I don’t like that deal.

In my opinion, ANYBODY with vascular, cardiac, clotting, or other issues like WANTING TO HAVE KIDS SOMEDAY, or NOT RISKING CANCER, should absolutely avoid the current clot shots.

In my opinion, the clot shot is stupidity advanced by greedy people who are controlled and manipulated by really evil people. In other words, it’s not stupid, greedy, or evil – it’s ALL OF THE ABOVE.

The DISEASE is no picnic, and I can see some people making the risk-benefit calculation in favor of the vaccine – particularly newer RBD antigen vaccines like Corbevax (Hotez/Baylor/India/open-source). But if people are dying in 5 years from experimental mRNA vaccines with the full spike protein – well, that is exactly like the RISK that one takes with SMOKING SOMETHING YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND.

Seriously, most Americans would refuse to take a novel “legal” or illegal designer drug, given stories like the “bath salts” and “Parkinson’s heroin” experiences which shocked the public in horror headlines.

Parkinson’s from Designer Heroin (Ironically related to Paraquat)

LINK: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1985-07-29-me-5136-story.html

LINK: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28282815/

VIDEOS: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=mptp&iax=videos&ia=videos (warning – they’re really sad)

Effects of “Bath Salts” (Euphemism for CCP Designer Drugs)

LINK: https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2014/06/16/321779232/how-bath-salts-a-drug-made-in-china-wreaked-havoc-in-the-u-s

LINK: https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdny/pr/akron-man-arrested-importing-bath-salts-china

The CLOT SHOT is a RISK, and not all of us will want to take that risk.

Mandating that risk is EVIL, IMO, and Democrats deserve to DIE AT THE POLLS in November for it.

Period.

They have BLOOD on their hands.


ThEthSkep’s Big Fix of All Things Coof

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/11/15/chinas-ccp-concealed-sars-cov-2-presence-in-china-as-far-back-as-march-2018/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/zww1q

This is what I really wanted to show you, right here.

The Ethical Skeptic, or TES, or “ThEthSkep“, as I sometimes call him, has proven to my satisfaction that CCP lied even MORE than we previously thought possible.

Is this hard to believe? That we got CHUMPED by CHINA yet again?

Yeah. Getting chumped by China YET AGAIN is a thing.

I am tempted to try to construct an “elevator pitch” of ThEthSkep’s argument, and have even asked him (in a moderated comment) if he could provide such a short explanation that I could pitch to others.

If he DOES provide one, I will do an entire post on it.

For the moment, I will just give you my “two paragraph description” of his very long and elegant post, which post I can guarantee most here will have trouble following.

TES argues that setting an earlier date for the actual initial Chinese release of an ancestral pathogen to current SARS-CoV-2, provides a far better explanation of the facts at hand, as well as some facts which he generated through analysis of the genetics of SARS-CoV-2 variants, than does the “standard model” of a late 2019 release, whether that late release is taken from the early Chinese LIES about a zoonotic outbreak in December 2019, or from the October 2019 Wuhan lab activities which have always struck me as potential disinformation.

In particular, an early 2018 release of a less pathogenic ancestor explains the omicron variant’s surprisingly early 2020 appearance and low pathogenicity so well, and China’s population resistance to the more pathogenic Wuhan variant, whether that was a descendant or (my thinking) a new release, that IMO it is the duty of the “standard model” to explain all of the facts better than the TES theory.

Now, like I said, this post by TES is not an easy read, even for those with some knowledge of the field, and even for those experienced in reading the scientific literature. He moves at “review speed” through a lot of reasoning and even his own work, which is not all shown, but which is all fully described and referenced.

I am actually WAITING for my first reading to fully sink in, but I can tell you this. As soon as I “freed myself” from the necessity of a late 2019 release, everything “coof” just started falling into place.

This is one of those things that starts generating RESETS in my mind, on everything I had thought before. Once you see what TES is getting at, it’s almost impossible to unsee it.

AND I CAN GO FURTHER.


I talk to a LOT of people, and listen carefully to their thinking about COVID. One of my sources is somebody who has a lot of contacts in Europe and Asia, especially India, due to working for an international firm.

That person strongly believes, based on illnesses within the corporation as well as associated entities, that something like COVID-19 was already circulating worldwide during ALL of 2019.

I had set this aside, unable to fit it into everything else I knew. NOW, however, it makes easy sense. In fact, the details which I don’t want to give, fit his model of spread EXACTLY.

If TES is correct, and I believe he is, then WE WERE DEALING WITH VARIANTS EVEN BEFORE THE CDC BEGAN TALKING ABOUT VARIANTS. In fact, they never told us that THE ORIGINAL WAS LIKELY JUST A VARIANT OF SOME PRIOR VARIANT.

And THIS explains much better why Fauci, Baric, Dazsak, and all the others were ready to cover up – because a virus related to their research had already gotten out in 2018. Going along with the Chinese story was a RELIEF to them – and they grabbed on tightly.

In other words, a conspiracy of aligning interests, not something discussed on paper or by phone. It’s a brilliant Chinese move, actually. Proffer a lie and see if our own scientists will join them in it.

The USEFUL IDIOT American media? NO PROBLEM.


And not just THAT stuff, but now we have much more evidence that these bugs could have been “in the wild” EVERYWHERE – including possibly just outside the Baric lab, near where Gail Combs picked up a “coofy” bug much earlier than would have been possible with a late 2019 release. (I will let her address the time-frames.)

Consider that China could even have been trying to FRAME or intimidate Baric with a stateside release in the vicinity of his lab. Why? Because NOW we have MOTIVE.

Does it make sense NOW that these highly contagious bugs could have been getting out willy-nilly from these laboratories? Or that China has been playing fast and loose with biological releases?

What does this mean?

It means that the whole NIH-Fauci-Wuhan complex has been in cover-up mode, trying to SAVE THEIR DANGEROUS RESEARCH which they know is VERY likely to be SHUT DOWN BY A CONGRESS RUN BY THE PEOPLE – no matter WHAT THE CAUSE OF THIS RELEASE.

Remember how I said the President Wolf Moon would send a cruise missile into every BSL level 4 that didn’t shut down immediately upon his inauguration? Those missiles armed with whatever insured that all viruses were FRIED?

See the motive to get rid of Trump now? WE THE PEOPLE cannot be allowed to interfere with their “holy” research.

And wait – there’s MOAR.


Somewhere in the years between 2005 and 2010, around the time I got an extremely SARS-CoV-2-like infection, complete with anosmia, exhaustion, and “sore lung”, I took note of the fact that all of my Asian colleagues in the “anti-CCP” camp became very religious about taking COVID-like precautions in our CCP-Chinese-infested workplace. These precautions included isolation, surface and aerosol measures, like wipes, air filters, and even clothing choices.

Most of us dismissed it as an “Asian thing” like masks, even though it was a sudden and new social phenomenon, but because I had contacts in that community who were sometimes sources of insight on CCP skulduggery, I noticed that ONLY the “antis” were engaging in the protective behaviors – the mainlanders and pro-CCP Hong Kongers/Taiwanese were not.

Interestingly, I was not getting any good information on the trend – unlike other scuttlebutt at the time.

Was it real or disinformation? Was it an op to flush out the antis? Was it “anti” paranoia?

I have no idea. But I personally think that China has been up to “bio-tricks” for a LONG time – as in back BEFORE SARS (2003).

If 2018 is the first time China released any biologicals, I would be VERY surprised.

SO – see what you think. Read this sucker, and then think about it.

I think TES is onto something.


A Note About January 6 – and More

I have been avoiding all things January 6, largely because I don’t want to give Nancy Gambino any “lift” as far as her phony “investigation” into HER OWN CRIME.

I understand her game plan, and I’m not going to play along.

I would have loved to have recounted that amazing day in another long, glowing, “all about me and my experiences” post, but no.

THIS IS WAR.

In my opinion, we can bring down these horrible communists faster by focusing on whatever WE want to focus on.

Nancy says “the fight is over here”.

NOPE. Go to hell, Mafia Bitch. We know what you did. With Kapo’s dirty FBI. And the backing of Mitch McConnell and SCOFFLAW SCOTUS.

Some may want to join the fight against Pelosi right now, and please feel free to “follow Darren Beattie into Pelosi’s breach”, but I think that MANDATES are going to kill these bastards at the polls, if we just help them commit electoral suicide.

Expose the “clot shot” risks more fully, and show that the mandates are MORE EVIL.

We need to make Democrats – destroying America for GREED under the cover of virtue signals – absolutely unelectable, and I think we can.

ENJOY THE SHOW.

Thank you all for being here. Have a great weekend.

W

Dear KMAG: 20220103 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Benadryl Could Have Saved Grandma / The Gatesification of Science

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our wonderful REALFLOTUS.

Hopefully, this great couple is getting some REST, because they may NEED IT.

I am telling y’all – the Trumps may very well be on their way back to the White House in 1-3 years.

In fact, the way Obammunism has been “performing” – stumbling in disarray behind the HUMAN SHIELD Joe Biden, it looks like even the core plotters are having regrets and doubts now.

Mark “Drop Box Treason” Zuckerberg isn’t buying up land for his giant hideaway in Hawaii – only a SUBMARINE RIDE AWAY FROM CHINA – for no reason. He knows that there is a limited future for this insane, incompetent, incorrigible, and unelected OBOLA-BIDUNG regime, that he helped force upon ALL OF US.

SPIT!!!


The Business At Hand

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get through it, TOGETHER.


The Rules

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.

The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

FOR EXAMPLE:

WE, the LINTARDS, the FLYNNTARDS, and the WeAin’tNeverGonnaWinTards are all welcome here, as long as we’re NICE ABOUT IT. The mutually odious viewpoints of disagreeing patriots are ALL welcome – those views just have to be expressed nicely, without accusing each other of being this, that, or the other.

Disagree with the material, not the character of the presenter.

Remember – Everybody is somebody else’s Ace Ventura.

As an alternative to character assassination, allow THE HOUSE to suggest better and more compelling material than the other person.

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

Those who cannot deal with this easy requirement will be forced to jump the hoops of moderation, so that specific comments impugning other posters and violating the minimal rules can be sorted out and tossed in the trash.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).

We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”


A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

You may also pray for our enemies, the Crazy Mask-Wearing Democrats. Note that Benadryl and some of the other antihistamines that can save their lives from COVID cooties, also act as antipsychotics.

We’ll get to more about THAT in a moment.


MUSICAL INTERLUDE

For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.

Today’s gonna be a real grab-bag. Don’t click on what you may not like.

THE SCROLLBAR OR MOUSE WHEEL COULD BE YOUR FRIEND.


This one is a bit too “heavy metal” for many of us, but it brings to my mind some of the questions of TRANSHUMANISM.

Food for thought.


OK – maybe we should balance that out with a little country, like last week? Maybe a bit “old pop country” – whatever! Enjoy this flash-in-the-pan country duo act, who look far too much like something from the Monica Lewinsky era.


Well, we can’t have Country without “Western”!

So how about something very familiar, but maybe you never really thought about how WEIRD it is that it actually IS familiar………?


OK – this is really straying pretty far afield from WHEATIE MUSIC.

So how about a little more of THAT? In fact, how about 90 minutes of it?


Alright! THAT was sufficient preparation for MORE WEIRDNESS.

I used to love this song. Kinda glad the styles changed since then, however.


So how about some Vitamin B – as in BOLLYWOOD?

This stuff is surprisingly listenable.

https://youtu.be/9XJkQ2tnbO8

You know what? Let’s COOL IT ON DOWN with some CHURCH ORGAN, CITY STYLE……


And finally, let us CLOSE with an OPENING HYMN!

There you go. Around the world in 8 music videos.


Call To Battle

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

CAN AH GIT AN EYE-ROLL???

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.


Featured Story – Benadryl Could Have Saved Grandma / The Gatesification of Science

Dr. Peter McCullough, in the first 6 minutes of his amazing interview with Joe Rogan…….

…..describes exactly what SHOULD have been done in the fight against COVID-19.

FIND THERAPEUTICS AND TREATMENTS
WITH SIGNALS OF BENEFIT
AND ACCEPTABLE SAFETY

AND START USING THEM

This is such a ridiculously simple idea, it should go without saying.

AND YET…..

The GATESIFICATION OF SCIENCE…..

…..OH, NO – DO NOT DENY IT…..

…..created an ANTI-MEDICAL DELUSION in both medicine and media…..

That we cannot, should not, and will not use LINUX DRUGS…..

…..until the “Windows” vaccines are ready for YOU to buy (with your taxes) and take them.


DEAR KAG: 20211224 – Christmas Eve – The Pub is OPEN / How Bill Gates Took Down Hydroxychloroquine

The Pub is OPEN again! With a blend of humor and seriousness, like any good bar, we celebrate this grand re-opening of WOLF’S PUB on Christmas Eve, December 24, 2021, by actually opening near closing time on Christmas Eve Eve, but what the heck. IT’S ALMOST CHRISTMAS. While our beloved bartender takes a needed break …


ARE YOU SEEING IT YET?

We will keep working on it until you do.

Today’s message is how BENADRYL provides ONE MORE EXAMPLE of a drug that showed a strong signal of benefit AND acceptable safety AND – shockingly – was very likely in the medicine cabinets of hundreds of thousands of people who died of COVID-19 NEEDLESSLY – simply because American medicine has been taken over at the top by the pharmaceutical industry and their financial backers.

They had to show us.

And they did.

If you are not familiar with my…..

  • finding of
  • explanation of
  • personal use of
  • support for
  • and
  • promotion of

…..the use of ANTIHISTAMINES as a simple, reliable, proven, and readily available “cure”, if you will, for “death by COVID”, then let me give you a quick list of my previous commentary and REFERENCES to this wonderful FACT.


The Zyrtec Rebellion

Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …


The Clot Shot, The Explanation Thereof, And The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand

I. The Clot Shot First things first. Nobody would be calling ALL of the various full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein vaccines “the clot shot” if there weren’t some clear and obvious problems with the full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein ITSELF. We already know that clotting dysfunction is key to COVID-19 pathogenicity. …


Ivermectin – The Preparation

OK, people. It is time for THE WOLF to GET PATTON ON YOUR ASSES. As you may know, we now have many of our dear members actively fighting COVID-19, including one (gil00) in the hospital. Several have received Regeneron. Thus far, praise God, we have not lost anybody – and I intend to keep it …


Delta Wolf

After a lost week of human self-experimentation to survive multiply mutated Fauci-Baric China Virus, Wolf has obtained answers to a thousand questions. Here are just a few of those answers. Over the last week, overcoming my SECOND case of the China virus, I have been able to learn quite a bit about the enemy’s weaponry …


Five Fast Omicron Facts You Can Send to Your Friends, Neighbors and Doctors (see number 4)

This is a quick update that is almost entirely GOOD NEWS, and that needs to SPREAD AROUND LIKE WILDFIRE – just like OMICRON. I will try to be brief and only comment as needed. 1 – A Case of Omicron Treated With HCQ Remember that case of COVID treated with ivermectin, that was published as …


DEAR KAG: 20211231 – … How to Hide a Histaminimus …

The Pub is OPEN! Of course we’re open on New Year’s Eve, for goodness sake! However, the crooked and despicable Clot Shot Casino is now CLOSED (more details later), for outrageous offenses like THIS. Colorado casino customers prosecuted for playing abandoned slot credits Prepare to be outraged, even though this story is from over 5 …


If you follow through these SIX posts, you will see the progression of my thinking.

  • recognition of cheap, common antihistamine therapy as lifesaving at nearly 100% levels
  • dawning of realization that NIH, CDC, and big pharma were not truly looking out for patients
  • realization that individuals needed to be ready to save themselves and their friends, family, neighbors and loved ones with various therapeutics
  • what I learned by treating my own confirmed case of delta with selected therapeutics
  • confirmation of the generality and stage 2 mechanism of H1 antihistamine therapy
  • how antihistamine therapy was hidden by the media as compared to HCQ and ivermectin, on behalf of the larger plot to control humanity

Indeed, I now see the suppression of knowledge of the most readily available, inexpensive, extremely safe COVID therapeutics, as one of the greatest, saddest, and most horrifying instances of GASLIGHTING in history – not merely the history of science.

Humans on this planet were HYPNOTIZED into NOT USING the two most obvious drugs in their medicine cabinets – aspirin and antihistamines – which could have saved them from a new and sometimes deadly “cold”.

Ironic, isn’t it? The media tried to talk us us out of aspirin just before it would have saved millions of people from both the “clot disease” and even the “clot shot”.

Funny, that. But it gets worse.

My doctors and their nurses distinctly and repeatedly tried to steer me to acetaminophen (Tylenol) for COVID, despite the fact that there was, at that time, ESTABLISHED, PUBLISHED, SOLID, PEER-REVIEWED LITERATURE showing that low-dose aspirin reduces hospitalization and death from COVID-19 by around half. And the reason is obvious to anybody with a wisp of scientific understanding – even at high-school levels. Aspirin is a blood thinner and anticoagulant, and the bad effects of the disease (and the shots) are thrombotic. Simple.

If there was ever a time to take aspirin, it was for COVID. The suppressed FLCCC.net treatment recommends it. Why not the AMA?

Can’t they read the damn signal?

Can’t they understand relative risk and benefit?

Like I said, VACCINE HYPNOSIS.

Peter McCullough talks about this phenomenon of vaccine hypnosis in the scientific and medical communities, in his great interview with Joe Rogan, above. I think he uses a different term for it, but we’re talking about the same thing.

The hypnotic blindness toward active use of therapeutics was bad for HCQ and ivermectin, but it was even worse for antihistamines, because the deception got past even the most active members of the “therapeutic” community – MYSELF INCLUDED.

I was a HUGE backer of [HCQ + disease-conferred immunity] as the best therapeutic path forward, from the very beginning. I later began appreciating ivermectin, too, as the data rolled in.

Enjoy one of my memes inspired by Cari Kelemen on Twitter, with her great quote at the bottom.

The problem is, at the deepest part of the conspiracy, we were GASLIT into focusing on chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, and not gaining social momentum toward more readily available drugs (aspirin and common antihistamines) that could have REALLY changed the game – but which would have VERY RAPIDLY moved the global outcome away from the pointless, problematic, Gates-controlled vaccines.

Once you understand that we were CHUMPS who were CONNED away from antihistamines, you understand how smart these people REALLY are.

They’re tricky – SO tricky.

Hydroxychloroquine, and then ivermectin, WERE part of the gaslighting. We loved them, and still do, but don’t kid yourself. They are GOOD, SAFE, EFFECTIVE drugs. But BOTH are prescription drugs. They require doctors, and this brilliant chess move distracted the few honest doctors, looking for therapeutics, by a hidden, unconscious, alignment with “what they could do to help”.

THE PERFECT BAIT – for the “please help” scam.

It’s like putting a firehose in front of a fireman when there is a fire, and seconds to stop it. The fireman may not know that down under all that burning wood is a fire that would go out faster and better with something other than water, but they do the right thing, and go for the first and most obvious solution that appears, consistent with their own abilities.

We don’t like to think that we were suckered by a SECOND LAYER OF THE SCAM, but we were.

I was actually suckered by such a scam, years ago, in assisting the deceitful implementation of the current highly broken version of affirmative action in universities. It’s an interesting story, but I’ll save it for another time.

The point is, the best way to CON people is to GET THEM TO BUY IN ENTHUSIASTICALLY.

People usually don’t catch these masterful crimes until the crooks are long gone and got what they wanted. It’s infuriating, but the multi-layer “please help” scam is effective as – well – HELL.

Hollywood, of course, is quite familiar with such “plots”.

BUT ANYWAY…..

Let’s get down to business.

Up until now, the two, large-scale, clinically proven sets of antihistamines for COVID-19 have been the newest (cetirizine, loratadine, and fexofenadine) and one of the oldest (promethazine), but not one of the most obvious possibilities – diphenhydramine, otherwise known as Benadryl.

Well, it turns out that Benadryl has been showing ENORMOUS promise in the laboratory.

LINK: https://www.wnd.com/2021/12/scientist-surprised-discovery-99-effective-cheap-covid-treatment/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/cwoPU


Now this particular researcher has been looking at a synergistic combination of diphenhydramine (Benadryl) with human lactoferrin, which achieves STUNNING results, in terms of ANTIVIRAL activity, albeit in vitro.

To quote the article:

The scientist who combined two widely available over-the-counter compounds that inhibited the novel coronavirus by 99% in early tests told WND he’s hopeful his treatment will be available “within months.”

“An FDA-approved treatment could be in sight within months if pharmaceutical companies utilize existing clinical trial resources,” said Dr. David Ostrov in an email interview with WND.

Let’s just quote that again for effect:

“An FDA-approved treatment could be in sight within months if pharmaceutical companies utilize existing clinical trial resources,” said Dr. David Ostrov in an email interview with WND.

To which the only proper response is…..

But wait – there’s moar!

Sadly, I’m sorry, but anybody who is still embedded in Fake Science and Fake Medicine needs to understand what I figured out while I was in the belly of the beast.

The people at the top, in Washington, DC, are no longer there to help the people.

They are there to help themselves.

Solutions are controlled by RETURN ON INVESTMENT – not by saved lives – THAT is secondary.

Which is too bad, because antihistamines are a solid cure against DEATH, per the Spanish study, and have a robust mechanism in both Stage 1 AND Stage 2 of COVID, with Ostrov’s work proving actual Stage 1 antiviral activity.

Please read the following comments by the scientist, Dr. David Ostrov, behind the study.

The story started before SARS, when my lab was studying drugs that bind ACE2, the molecule that turned out to be the receptor for SARS and SARS-CoV-2.

We previously found that an antihistamine (hydroxyzine) bound ACE2, and in 2020 were able to test the ability of this drug to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in the lab. It was an “aha” moment when the data clearly showed that a common antihistamine inhibited the virus that causes COVID. Different scientists at the University of Florida College of Medicine used different isolates of SARS-CoV-2, and the results agreed with each other. An antihistamine can inhibit the virus!

We then realized that there may be similar drugs that could inhibit the virus, perhaps even over-the-counter drugs. But which drugs?

We collaborated with investigators and UCSF where they examined the medical records for more than 219,000 people tested for SARS-CoV-2. They found that usage of diphenhydramine was associated with a lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2. In other words, in this population, people were less likely to be infected with COVID if they used diphenhydramine.

Why would taking an allergy pill lead to lower risk of COVID? There could be many reasons, but is it possible that a simple allergy pill can directly inhibit the virus that causes COVID?

We did the experiments at the University of Florida College of Medicine, and the data was published in a peer reviewed journal. Diphenhydramine exhibits direct antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2. Diphenhydramine inhibits virus replication, inhibits virus shedding and inhibits host cell killing.

This is all wonderful news, but it NEVER penetrated the “vaccine hypnosis”, and here is why. Again, a quote from the investigator, Dr. Ostrov.

My prediction is that antiviral drug combinations, such as diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, will provide a similar level of benefit as Regeneron monoclonal antibodies, Pfizer and Merck antivirals, at less than 1/100 the cost of those therapies.

There you go. Right there. “Less than one one-hundredth the cost” is NOT what these companies, bureaucrats, and politicians want to hear. They may nod and say “wonderful”, but if it does not cause as much “other people’s money” to move as the vaccines, then nobody will champion it.

However, that does NOT mean that WE THE LAB RATS can’t use the knowledge to save ourselves.

Ostrov is not stupid, and he gives up some crucial data while preserving his scientific credibility.

AND I QUOTE:

Ostrov told WND he’s been in communication with people who wonder if their use of the compounds has helped prevent them from getting COVID-19.

He noted that “anecdotal stories are certainly not proof of efficacy,” but many people have contacted him about diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, and their results “are difficult to ignore.”

“For many people, they say everyone around them got COVID, but not them,” Ostrov said.

And they ask the professor if diphenhydramine and/or lactoferrin.

“Without placebo controlled clinical trials, we will not have a definitive answer,” he said. “The answer for now, though, is maybe.”

Ostrov mentioned a contact who takes a daily dose of Benadryl and regularly drinks milk. She said she had been in close contact for hours with someone who was hospitalized the next day for COVID-19. But after waiting five days from the time of exposure, she tested negative for COVID.

He cautioned that people “considering their own concoction should understand that our experiments were carried out with human lactoferrin, not cow.” And the lactoferrin he used was purified in a special way to enhance its antiviral properties and is not likely to be found on the shelf.

People should consult with their physician, Ostrov said, before taking any drug for a use other than its intended use.

“Even though historically there are relatively few adverse events reported for diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, it should be noted that long term use of any medication, or combination of medications, could have unexpected consequences,” he said.

Ostrov said he hopes that once FDA-approved, “people may benefit from this antiviral drug combination for two-to-three month intervals during each wave of COVID infections.”

Notice that while Ostrov VERY HELPFULLY admits there is some real life usage of the drugs going on, and some success, he also downplays the admission to a politically correct level, using excuses that are completely mitigating against accusations of “recommendation”. The man is not stupid. He’s getting the word out, while staying in the lanes that Fake Science demands he stay in.

BUT – and this should be very clear – it’s obvious that people CAN and WILL make use of this cure – particularly the Benadryl. Thus, Ostrov makes a nicely balanced warning about long-term use of Benadryl, which is known to be potentially problematic, but also probably not an issue for most people who are treating or occasionally/periodically preventing COVID-19.

And, of course, there are many other antihistamines which are KNOWN TO BE SAFE for long-term usage, which are (IMO, based on the Spanish work) acceptable substitutes for Benadryl.

Let me add some other links on Benadryl that people may find useful.

Here is an earlier article on Ostrov’s work:

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-12-antihistamine-drugs-effectiveness-covid-virus.html

One of the things to notice here is that this article was published over a year ago (December 2020), describing work that occurred over years before that, but that then ramped up under COVID during 2020.

In that ENTIRE TIME, at the same time Ostrov was doing foundational research, the clinical efficacy of THREE antihistamines was discovered, tested, demonstrated in a group of people, and published (March to September 2020) by the nursing home doctors in Spain. AND, during that time Dr. Chetty in South Africa demonstrated the clinical utility of promethazine in thousands of patients.

In a sane world, as soon as the Spanish results were RECEIVED for publication (September 2020), there should have been immediate emergency pre-publication for the benefit of clinicians. Instead, the paper was basically held until January 2021, when the vaccines were safely in production.

The SYSTEM is not designed to save lives in anything near an optimal fashion. It is designed to make money as a primary motivation, and – perhaps – THE primary motivation.

So why has Ostrov’s work apparently advanced no further toward treating people IN PRACTICE?

Because NOBODY in government or industry wants it. And they have OUR MONEY invested elsewhere.

Of course, that doesn’t mean there isn’t GREAT research going on. Just look at this confirmation of Dr. Chetty’s contention that antihistamines are useful in the treatment of “long COVID”.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210608/Antihistamines-might-be-effective-in-long-COVID.aspx

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.06.21258272v1

And HERE is a real treat that most people missed.


‘My Super-Antibodies Can Defeat Any COVID Variant’

JOHN HOLLIS
ON 3/15/21 AT 5:05 PM EDT

https://www.newsweek.com/super-antibodies-covid-variant-1576311


“Well, I wouldn’t be so sure they do it alone, dude.”

Here is a guy – a recoveree – whose blood was found to be very lethal against SARS-CoV-2 – far more than most people’s blood.

Interestingly, the guy is something of a Benadryl addict due to allergies, and he took it during COVID.

Whether he took Benadryl prior to sample collection in July 2020 is unknown, but Benadryl is metabolized in the liver, otherwise by excretion to a lesser extent, so it’s possible that serum Benadryl could have enhanced the ability of any antibodies, by blocking ACE2 receptors while antibodies then bound to viral spike protein – a rather nifty tag-team effect.

You will see that this story is filled with coincidences – for example, the writer is the director of communications at the university that was running the study, and already knew the head of the study. He then volunteered to be tested, directly to that person, while doing a story.

And you know what I think of “their” journalists. LOW-GRADE SPIES AND PROVOCATEURS.

I don’t want to speak for Sadie, but if she throws a “Suspicious Cat at this story, I’m ready to throw FOUR of them.

AND I QUOTE:

I didn’t know it at the time, but my unlikely story had begun after becoming heavily congested to start the last week of March 2020. I had NO other symptoms whatsoever besides repeatedly having to blow my nose. Pollen was everywhere that time of year as per usual, so I just naturally attributed my sudden nasal issues to that. I loaded up on Benadryl and was feeling 100 percent again by week’s end four days later. There was never as much as a single thought that I had contracted COVID-19.

John Hollis

So the writer had COVID during the last week of March 2020, loaded up on Benadryl, finished out a very typical “good” case in 4 days, and very likely continued taking Benadryl, at least on occasion, for allergies.

AND I QUOTE AGAIN:

The George Mason antibody study, which began in April, was unique in that it was a saliva-based test rather a blood-based one and would eventually be used to screen students, faculty and staff. Mason was among the nation’s first universities to take this approach in the fight against the spread of the virus and maintains one of the only 13 National Institutes of Health-sponsored Biosafety Level 3 Biomedical Research Laboratories equipped to handle live COVID-19 samples from which Dr. Liotta and his team could quickly test.

Now jump to mid-July 2020.

As George Mason University’s Communications Manager, I had received word in mid-July that the scientists had come across some positive initial results.

I soon met with Dr. Liotta at his office on George Mason’s Science and Technology Campus in Manassas, Virginia to discuss their findings. I’ve known him for a few years now after having previously worked with him on other projects, so we’ve had a good relationship for a while. I was about to leave his office when I casually mentioned to Dr. Liotta that the guy I lived with had become terribly sick with the virus in early April. I had been so certain at that time that a similar fate or worse also awaited me that I even penned a letter to my teenage son just in case. I considered myself incredibly lucky to have gone unscathed.

This is when he volunteered for the test.

Or so I believed at the time.

So I figured there was no harm in asking if I could join the several hundred volunteers who had already participated in the study. Dr. Liotta agreed and I returned a few days later to give blood and saliva samples as a late addition to the research. The whole process took maybe 30 minutes.

This is how the story wraps up.

I was still of the belief that I had somehow dodged the bullet back in April and never even considered that I might have already contracted the virus, let alone that it may have been I who passed it on to my housemate. I had no reason to anticipate anything whatsoever coming of my lab results.

But after further careful analysis of my blood, Dr. Liotta and his team soon confirmed that I had contracted an American strain of the virus while also explaining to me exactly how and where the “super” antibodies had attacked and entirely eradicated the virus from my body. My blood has since proven equally as effective in killing every different strain of COVID-19, including the latest highly transmissible variants from both the U.K. and South Africa. I can’t even be a carrier for the virus.

I’ve been told this is somewhat akin to the medical equivalent of finding the Holy Grail.

I was one of eight people who participated in the study found to have “super” antibodies, with each person showing varying levels of natural protection from the virus. In addition to its ability to so effectively neutralize COVID-19, my blood is unique because the “super” antibodies in it have remained highly concentrated nearly a year after my infection. Most people’s antibodies typically wane significantly after 60 to 90 days.

How and why my body does this remains the million dollar question, but it means that I and others like me are best-suited to possibly help scientists mass reproduce antibodies like mine in the hopes of creating a treatment for COVID-19 and a lasting and far more effective vaccine.

It’s been sobering to think that my blood and that of others like me could potentially save thousands of lives or perhaps more.

So then imagine the irony of my having been randomly selected seven times for COVID testing between late September 2020 and March 2021. Each of the occasions—all with negative results—were part of George Mason University’s comprehensive Safe Return to Campus plan. It’s made for some good laughs and I’ve never once minded the very slight inconvenience. It’s like taking a test when you’ve been given all the answers in advance.

I’ve been very fortunate and feel blessed beyond measure.

Notice the TWO KICKERS which are to me indicative of a non-protein, small-molecule therapeutic in his plasma, with a longer half-life than more denaturable and strain-specific antibodies.

My blood has since proven equally as effective in killing every different strain of COVID-19, including the latest highly transmissible variants from both the U.K. and South Africa. I can’t even be a carrier for the virus.

I was one of eight people who participated in the study found to have “super” antibodies, with each person showing varying levels of natural protection from the virus. In addition to its ability to so effectively neutralize COVID-19, my blood is unique because the “super” antibodies in it have remained highly concentrated nearly a year after my infection. Most people’s antibodies typically wane significantly after 60 to 90 days.

SO – honestly – I think it would be very interesting to discover exactly how much Benadryl was in his blood samples when he took tests, and which may still be in those samples.

Why, this story could get even more interesting.

Are they toying with us?

I don’t know. Toying is a way of testing, is it not?

I can certainly think of the propaganda value of converting the strength of the “enemy position” – the “evolutionary solution” (therapeutics like Benadryl) into a story about antibodies (the “revolutionary solution”) – which supports both new vaccines and new, expensive, antibody therapies.

(See my prior discussion of Faucism as modern Lysenkoism for that to make sense.)

Anybody seeing how that works? It’s very Marxist, actually.

Is there some Gramsci in Fauci? Maybe nearby? Interesting times.


BACK TO ETHICAL QUESTIONS

The ever-vulgar, ever-right Karl Denninger CLUED ME IN, by virtue of a rather ranty rant, to a post by one of the best voices in the world of SCIENCE and REASON – a guy named The Ethical Skeptic.

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/12/30/denial-of-early-covid-19-treatment-a-crime-against-humanity/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/hemSW

TES, as he is known, is framing the “go home and take Tylenol and die or don’t die from COVID” therapy that most of us got, as a kind of INVOLUNTARY CONTROL EXPERIMENT – including DENIAL OF TREATMENT – without our informed consent.

I think his approach is VERY powerful.

AND I QUOTE:

In other words, I was allowed to choose whether I would be a member of
the ‘no treatment allowed’ control group or alternately one of the vaccine test groups;
however, through denying me timely treatment,
I was not offered the ethical choice of not participating in the experiment altogether.

Neither was I informed as to the nature of this experiment, nor was I made aware that other treatments or therapies were at my avail, should I decline participation. I was fraudulently coerced by a medical professional (and by advising health officials) into the belief that I had no choice, I had to participate. My life was endangered and I was exposed to unnecessary amounts of suffering and expense as a result of this coerced experiment. I was not offered the remedies or recourse to address the situation in the instance where the experiment failed (it did fail) or failed to ensure my safety, nor was I given the opportunity to bring the experiment to an end.


What this really shows us is how BADLY medicine has been overrun by both corporate and government interests, which are now allied against medical freedom, and even against truth itself in science and medicine.

Back to McCullough.

SIGNALS OF BENEFIT and ACCEPTABLE SAFETY.

Not what we’re seeing with the limited choices being offered by establishment medicine and government, and which are clearly being LIED about by the narrative enforcers of social media.

The fact that Anthony Fauci and Gilead Pharmaceuticals would promote a drug (remdesivir) that had – AT BEST – no better signals of benefit than hydroxychloroquine – BUT that had FAR WORSE SAFETY – and that also had – admittedly – a higher profit margin……

Well, that pretty much tells you all you need to know about “ethics” in “Deep Science”.

And remember – Anthony Fauci’s WIFE is some kind of “ethics czarina” at NIH. A VERY interesting family, including a daughter at Twitter.

LINK: https://www.the-sun.com/news/1796332/who-is-dr-fauci-wife-christine-grady/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/yCgv7

How cozy.

Again, a bibliography of back-up on the corruption surrounding remdesivir.


Remdesivir Is How We Bring Down The Temple of Faucism

I have been a poor and rotten servant of the Lord during my too long and too miserable life. I have made innocent women cry. I have led others astray. I have turned away from those in need in their time of need, and I have lied to myself and to God about why I …


The Murder of Veronica Wolski by Fauci and Gilead’s Zyklon D

There will be justice for Veronica Wolski, because we will DEMAND IT. And until there IS justice, we will drag the CRIMES of Anthony Fauci and Gilead “Pharmaceuticals” and their SLEAZY ASSOCIATES thorough the headlines, over and over, until people SPIT IN THEIR PATH as they walk down the streets. So where do we begin? …


NIH and Gilead Blamecasting Remdesivir Renal Toxicity to an Excipient

Well, they can lock us out of The Q Tree, but they can’t stop the truth from getting out. Enjoy a post first over on The U Tree and now HERE. Here is a quickie in my WAR ON REMDESIVIR. Fellow Treeper barkerjim dropped an interesting document today, from back in July, which showed the …


OAN Hosts Amazing Anonymous Documentary on Discovery and Suppression of Ivermectin for COVID, and How Gilead and Fauci Gamed a Remdesivir Study

My dear wife is the one who found this, so let me start off by thanking her. After working outside Tuesday night, I came in the front door, and my wife IMMEDIATELY told me to start watching what was on OAN. It was an anonymous Rumble video about ivermectin and remdesivir that OAN re-bannered and …


The point is simple.

Benadryl is EVEN SAFER than hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, by many standards, seeing that it is considered safe for OTC, and those other drugs are not.

Benadryl meets the McCullough CriteriaSignals of Benefit and Acceptable Safety.

And Benadryl is already out there – ready to help people get through COVID.

We also have other, more modern antihistamines – PROVEN to save lives from COVID-19, in the Spanish study.

In my opinion, antihistamine therapy is the baseline outpatient therapy that should have been mass-introduced globally, to practically eliminate death from COVID.

But DEEP SCIENCE had other ideas.

Just as I believe there was a conspiracy of interest against hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, I believe there was an even deeper conspiracy against the more readily available antihistamines.

And I believe that unless people answer for these crimes, there will be more like them in the future.


Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

eleutherophobia

noun

fear of freedom

From Ancient Greek ἐλευθερία (eleuthería, “freedom”) +‎ -phobia.

el-ūth-er-o-fō′bi-a, el-ūth-er-o-mā′ni-a, etc.

Used in a sentence:

The eleutherophobia of many rank-and-file Democrats is a useful tool of the miseleutheric Democrat / Communist leadership. The eleutherophilia if not eleutheromania of the true patriot is rarely found among Democrats these days, thanks to socialist infiltration and control of the party.

Used in a video:

This guy is a bit of a trip – not exactly our style of patriot, but he belongs to an interesting bunch.

They could use a bit more Biblical wisdom, IMO, and perhaps a bit less “woo”, but at least they’re not eleutherophobes.

Ἐλευθερία ἢ Θάνατος. (“Freedom or Death.”)


ENJOY THE SHOW

Have a great week, people – and a very FREE 2022.

W

Making Sense of Pro-Vax Trump

Risks, Bets, Rewards and Losses – Why Vaccine-Conferred and Disease-Conferred Immunity are Both Proper Personal Gambles When Choice is Free and Enough Truth is Known or Unknown


Many of us were shocked that President Trump just showed his “pro-vax” hand in an interview with vaxx nutt Bill O’Reilly, but if you watch Trump long enough, you realize that he very often gets to the optimal perspective before anybody else – even with incomplete data.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1472987776786354177

It’s worth wondering why Trump said what he said, and said it when he said it.

Beyond the “credit” issue – which I can really see for many reasons, not the least of which is because Trump’s plan really messed up the Cabal plans on COVID – I think Trump knows people who are seeing the emerging data. And I think they are advising him correctly.

I’m going to try to show you some of that data, and what it means.

Rand Paul is a sharp guy, too. Trump respects Rand Paul. It pays to ask why. I think that part of it is because Rand is a doctor. Trump respects doctors, I am convinced. And Trump knows that doctors differ in their opinions, like everybody else, and that he (Trump) needs to listen to a number of them, to see where the best perspective resides.

Rand is not anti-vaxx. He’s pro-natural-immunity. There is a difference.

At the place where Trump’s viewpoint and Rand Paul’s viewpoint intersect, you will find much truth. I certainly did. And when I added in a few other doctors “on our side”, and looked carefully at where I was skeptical of some of their thinking, but also let them convince me to be skeptical of some of my own thinking, I hit the jackpot.

BOTH the vaccines AND the disease make sense as alternative, risky, immunity-conferring antigens. Neither one is obviously superior to the other for everybody, because the landscape of risk and benefit is too complex, and depends far too much on the needs, goals, and medical circumstances of the individual. Worse still, past choices – including accidental ones – affect future choices.

Rand Paul saw right into this – that the CRUX of the problem is that “natural immunity” is being ignored by a monetarily, scientifically, and institutionally compromised medical establishment. Natural, disease-conferred immunity is the BEST CHOICE for many people – particularly when combined with a “delay of onset” strategy, and TREATMENT, which alters the risk/benefit. We have known this all along, yet we have never truly internalized it, because the “Let’s You And Him Fight” strategy of the OBAMA MANDATES has widened and deepened the division between those who choose vaccines and those who don’t.

AND LOGIC.

Trump GETS THIS. And he said so. We ARE falling into their trap. BUT we can turn that around on a DIME.

It is critical for our side – the free and sane medicine side – to EXPOSE and BASH the performance of the vaccines, because the other side won’t do it. But it is also critical that we STAND UP for the freedom for others to take those risky vaccines voluntarily, and accept the truth that it can make sense, during a period where we don’t know everything, and MAYBE beyond that, after we know more.

Mandates are absolutely stupid, reckless, and anti-science. They interfere with medicine. The mandating commies need to BTFO. But letting fearful people take a risky vaccine – a personal gamble – is a part of freedom that we have to respect.

I want to show you data that makes this make sense.


Some of you may be surprised that I am defending the COVID vaccines AT ALL. At present I have ZERO intention of taking one. For me, and my wife, they are a BAD medical choice. For many others, too.

Well, what if I tell you that in doing so, I can defend disease-conferred immunity EVEN MORE?

What if I tell you that I can now see why, strategically, Trump waited until we “knee-capped” – but didn’t kill – the vaccines?

BOTH SIDES HAD TO SEE MORE CLEARLY.

Let me help you see more clearly.


Natural Immunity – More Risk With More Reward?

What I just said there is not always true.

For CHILDREN, it appears that the vaccines are MORE RISK, LESS REWARD.

Yeah, Trump was right about that.

It’s a NO-BRAINER to NOT, NOT, NEVER, EVER give this shit to kids, and I personally hope that God himself does whatever is needed to save children from the MONSTERS who are injecting them with these RELATIVELY dangerous vaccines.

Kids are being deprived of EXCELLENT natural immunity, for JUNK immunity that makes money for Big Pharma.

Just for starters, we may be condemning these kids to a lifetime of life-robbing spike boosters, just by virtue of a well-understood idea of “original antigenic sin”, or OAS. OAS is where one antigen leads to an inappropriate response to a later antigen, vaccine, or infection.

This means that if we give children a misleading FIRST ANTIGENIC STIMULUS, they may then be STUCK with sub-optimal antibody immunity, leaving them for an unknown time at GREATER RISK from the disease. It may very well be that the BEST FIRST ANTIGEN for SARS-CoV-2 is the DISEASE – not a spike protein vaccine.

We don’t KNOW what will happen long-term when we inject kids. Or, at least, most of us don’t. Maybe Fauci does.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Is it a good idea? Should we bet ALL our kids on that idea?

NO FREAKING WAY.

And THAT is assuming that these vaccines do nothing to affect fertility. If they DO affect fertility, then this has to be made a KNOWN and ADMITTED risk, at the very least – not covered up, like it is right now.

A call for Nuremberg II, more likely, if this was knowingly advanced.

Who wants to risk their kids’ chance of having children?

This brings up the question of whether parents have the right to *knowingly* neuter their kids. Some parents already are, by “transing” kids. I think it’s pretty clear that’s where the Cabal is going – neutering and spaying humans. Interesting question. Should it be sent to SCOFFLAW SCOTUS? How is Amy Comey Barren going to vote on that one?

Asking for a FIEND.

I would even extend that thinking to teens and young adults. There is no reason that I can see to give them the vaccine. But should they have that choice, in consultation with their doctors? Interesting question. Very hard to reconcile a pro-life position with that, isn’t it?

But back to natural immunity.


Natural Immunity – More Rewards

Are there, in fact, more rewards?

I think so. Look at these two figures from the UK Ministry of Health, showing spike protein antibodies in people in England in 2021.

LINK:

…..https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf

The darker the color, the stronger the antibodies.

The first graphs are people who have no evidence of having caught the disease (N protein negative). They include the unvaccinated uninfected and the vaccinated uninfected.

The yellow is the unvaccinated people who have not caught the disease – mostly kids.

Green, blue and purple are various levels of vaccination success – the darker, the more spike antibodies.

Now look at people who got some or all of their spike immunity by natural infection with the disease.

Assuming it’s a wash as far as the quality of the antibodies – which is not necessarily true – it’s obvious that these recoverees have a more robust spike antibody immunity – to say nothing of likely immunity to some or all of the other 20+ proteins in SARS-CoV-2.

Rand Paul, right here. The man is asking the right questions.

So why is Fauci ignoring this natural immunity stuff?

Notice that KIDS don’t mount a strong spike immunity, even though they beat down the disease in a hurry, with minimal symptoms. This is likely an EVOLVED RESPONSE – an EVOLVED STRATEGY – a form of EVOLVED INTELLIGENCE. What it says is that kids “know” by evolution – don’t build a lasting defense to the ever-changing spike protein. Meanwhile, the virus tries to “rope-a-dope” us slowly into concentrating on the spike as we age, misleading us with each attack. We lean on the crutch of spike antibodies that don’t work on the next strain, or actually make things worse.

Kinda funny that Fauci and the “follow the science” types don’t respect this signal from evolution, but whatever. That’s the basis of another post. But keep it in mind – it’s likely important.

So let us not digress.

The bottom line is that IF you’re going to make spike antibody immunity your standard of success, which Fauci and company clearly have, as part of Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis”, then by that standard, “natural immunity” from the disease gives MORE REWARD.

And again, I remind you, there are MANY other metrics of immunological success which are highly relevant, and which are ignored under Fauci spike antibody hypnosis. Always keep that in mind.


Natural Immunity – More Risks

SO – is the disease “more risk” to get that more reward?

My answer would be “maybe”.

It’s a complex calculation – particularly if you factor in “not getting the disease until you get it”. When you vaccinate, it’s a down payment in full, and with boosters, you’re even stuck with installments. You are “accepting that the risks happen” at 100%. Vaccination “collapses the probabilities”. But if you take your chances on the disease, by simply not vaccinating, you are delaying the (probably) higher risk, but the “risk over time” is substantially reduced.

Imagine the “payoff” of not vaccinating or getting the disease until Omicron. That would have been a GREAT gamble and winnings.

But let’s look at an ACTUAL COMPARATIVE RISK of vaccine vs. disease.

Now – let me be clear from the start – this article is a CLICK-BAIT CHERRY-PICKING of the highest order. The title numbers SEEM shocking – until you dig into it, and go to the source.

But still, they’re not “lying”. It’s just misguided. But that CHAFF led me to WHEAT.

Let me include the entire, short report, as it appeared in GWP.


On December 14th, 2021, Nature Medicine released a study based on a broad population data set analyzed by researchers at Oxford University. The researchers examined the risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination and infection.

The Oxford researchers reveal that 1 in 100 or 1% of all vaccinated individuals were admitted to the hospital or died with arrhythmia or irregular heartbeat.

Of the 38,615,491 vaccinated individuals included in our study, 385,508 (1.0%) were admitted to hospital with or died from cardiac arrhythmia at any time in the study period (either before or after vaccination); 86,754 (0.2%) of these occurred in the 1-28 days after any dose of vaccine. Of those who were admitted or died 39,897 (10.3%) had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test, with 29,694 (7.7%) having a positive test before vaccination. There were 7,795 deaths with cardiac arrhythmia recorded as the cause of death (1,108 had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test).

So 1 in 100 of the vaccinated individuals are going to the hospital with irregular heart beat and this isn’t international headlines?

This is a shocking number.

James Cintolo has more on this study.


Wolf again.

This study appeared in the journal NATURE. That is the big leagues. We have to take this seriously. But let’s look at it closely. It REALLY helps to see that entire document, although SUSPICIOUS CAT should come out, just looking at the TITLE.

NATURE PAPER: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0

Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection

See? This isn’t just about the vaccines – it looks at infection, too. Is Gateway Pundit giving us the full story? Maybe not.

ABSTRACT:

Although myocarditis and pericarditis were not observed as adverse events in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine trials, there have been numerous reports of suspected cases following vaccination in the general population. We undertook a self-controlled case series study of people aged 16 or older vaccinated for COVID-19 in England between 1 December 2020 and 24 August 2021 to investigate hospital admission or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias in the 1–28 days following adenovirus (ChAdOx1, n = 20,615,911) or messenger RNA-based (BNT162b2, n = 16,993,389; mRNA-1273, n = 1,006,191) vaccines or a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive test (n = 3,028,867). We found increased risks of myocarditis associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 vaccines and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine over the 1–28 days postvaccination period, and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3), one (95% CI 0, 2) and six (95% CI 2, 8) myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively, in the 28 days following a first dose and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273. This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41) myocarditis events per 1 million patients in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We also observed increased risks of pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Similar associations were not observed with any of the COVID-19 vaccines, apart from an increased risk of arrhythmia following a second dose of mRNA-1273. Subgroup analyses by age showed the increased risk of myocarditis associated with the two mRNA vaccines was present only in those younger than 40.

The TRUTH is right in there.

First, we have to remember that GWP was concentrating on 1% of vaccinated people during the study period, INCLUDING before they got vaccinated, going to the hospital for or dying from a cardiac arrhythmia. That “before they got vaccinated” point is a TIP, right there, that we really need to consider the risk for UNVACCINATED people, too – including these very same people – for comparison. And as an aside, what is the number for corresponding unvaccinated people? You can almost guess that for most old people, it’s gonna be – well – maybe 1%?

And indeed, when the researchers compared the risk of an “event” against the risks of these patients BEFORE vaccination, they got their answers.

The WORST CASE for the vaccines was myocarditis. So let’s look at that, first.

Here is the risk from the vaccines. Broken out with [notations] so it’s easy to understand.


We found increased risks of myocarditis

associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 [AstraZeneca] and BNT162b2 [Pfizer] vaccines

and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 [Moderna] vaccine

over the 1–28 days postvaccination period,

and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. [STRONGLY NOTE THIS!!!]

We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3),

one (95% CI 0, 2)

and six (95% CI 2, 8)

myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively,

in the 28 days following a first dose

and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million

vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273.


SO – this confirms what we know. The vaccines cause myocarditis. It’s a RISK. It’s a handful or two in a million, per injection.

But now, let’s look at the NEXT LINE.


This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41)

myocarditis events per 1 million patients

in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test.


What this says TO ME is that the risk of this one heart problem, in a vaccine that gives less immunity, is a significant fraction of the same risk from the disease.

Obviously due to the SPIKE PROTEIN, and possibly with a simple correlation to exposure.

I will admit that it’s LESS RISK from the vaccines, but not all that much.

Look at MODERNA.

The compiled risk of myocarditis from the TWO SHOTS (6+10 = 16) is 40% of the disease risk (40).

And yet HERE is how the authors have to word things to get it past the referees and editors.


“In summary, this population-based study quantifies for the first time the risk of several rare cardiac adverse events associated with three COVID-19 vaccines as well as SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in adults was associated with a small increase in the risk of myocarditis within a week of receiving the first dose of both adenovirus and mRNA vaccines, and after the second dose of both mRNA vaccines. By contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a substantial increase in the risk of hospitalization or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmia.


They played a lot of word games there – take it from a retired scientist. They are also STUDIOUSLY AVOIDING some big stories that would rub the industry wrong.

“Give the editors what they want.”

Now, before I examine that conclusion for further trickery on the “within a week” qualifier and several other points (not today), I just want to say that calling 16 “small” and 40 “substantial” is bullshit.

Author bias, implicit or imposed, as a virtue signal to Bill Gates’ “vaccine culture” in science.

I will bet MONEY that a third Moderna booster would come in at 14 or more, bringing the total myocarditis events from chronic spike protein exposure to 30 or more, AND at the 4th injection SURPASSING the risk of ONE untreated disease incidence.

Well, is it worth it?

I don’t want Dementia Joe telling ME that it’s worth it. I want to make that determination MYSELF.

And GUESS WHAT? I will also bet money that part of the reason that CDC wanted people to mix and match boosters was to get Moderna “recoverees” boosted with the less cardiotoxic Pfizer or J+J vaccines, while not admitting that…

….defects from each spike protein vaccine are cumulative.

See how that works? Science. It’s great when you’re HONEST.

And why IS Pfizer causing fewer cardiac problems? In my opinion, it is very likely because the vaccine is distributing more widely and slowly in the body, thanks to the extreme vaccine lipid nanoparticle longevity (hence shedding) and biodistribution – data that was hidden from us, but turned up in the Japanese freedom of information request.

To me, the fact that nobody sees or talks about this stuff, is just more evidence of “vaccine hypnosis” of academia, as noted by Peter McCullough.

The reality? PICK YOUR POISON. Disease or vaccine.

If we go back to the arrhythmia example, it turns out that the “shocking 1%” actually GOES AWAY when compared to the unvaccinated. This makes sense, when you recall the very common problem of “palpitation” sending people to the ER, long before “long COVID” was a thing.

Yeah, 1% is shocking, but it’s shocking for the unvaccinated, too. Gateway Pundit was just throwing unwarranted shade.

Now, let’s take a look at some GRAPHICS from the study. Pictures tell a thousand words – not all bad for the vaccines – not all bad for “natural immunity”.

On the left axis you have the three vaccines, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna, followed by the disease.

On the bottom axis, time – repeated three times for the three diseases.

As you can see for cardiac arrhythmia (right side), the vaccines are basically fine, but the disease is problematic. This makes LOTS of sense, because the disease seems to cause many problems by nerve infiltration, secondary to vascular distribution, and those nervous system infections and inflammations are highly relevant for arrhythmias, whereas the vaccine is primarily a vascular villain, which does NOT reproduce and infiltrate.

The science makes sense here! Wonderful!

All of the vaccines have at least a little bit of myocarditis effect (left side), which is explained nicely by vascular distribution of the spike protein. Moderna, which is notorious for “disease-like symptoms” at the recipient experience level, is easily expected to have even more COVID-like spike protein effects that are not immediately obvious, such as myocarditis.

Big point – ONLY the disease (bottom side) kicks off all three diseases. THAT is what a virus can do, that a bare protein, or even a non-reproducing virus-like particle, cannot.

Everything is making sense here. Let’s look at ANOTHER view of the data.

This graph has some GREAT STUFF. The myocarditis comparison described in detail above, is the graph on the LEFT. The numbers for the vaccines look substantially less, but you can see how Moderna boosters would quickly approximate the disease, and are already like a “mild case” in terms of risks. The authors of the paper avoid talking about the cumulative risks, but it’s clear that “boosterama” is PRECISELY Fauci’s game plan, and it has problems that got solved for Moderna by mix-and-match boosters.

Fauci and Walensky. Always taking care of their companies. Yeah, I kinda get it. But you gotta be HARD-ASS with them, like Director Wolf Moon would be.

The whole vaccine thing – including a lot of other adverse effects I’ve mentioned previously but not discussed here – looks to me like a trade-off. These are NOT good vaccines. They’re actually pretty marginal. BUT for people who really don’t think they can take the disease, it could be a reasonable gamble, IMO.

There are LOTS of people who take these vaccines, and no problem. I know – I talk to them all the time. I’m the most vaccine-supportive vaccine skeptic on Earth. These people just dump everything to me, because they know I don’t judge them, but respect their decisions. I’m interested in what happened to them, and they tell me.

NADA. ZIP. The most common reaction. For those people, the shot may make sense. But there are a good number of others who get laid up hard for a day in bed, and it sounds almost as bad as COVID. I worry about them. Some – A LOT.

Now look at the second graph – myocarditis in younger people. Clearly Moderna is WAY out of whack, and the others are comparable to the disease when boosted. Again – for these people – really BAD vaccines. This is why you saw action on the vaccines. Get values up close to the disease, in terms of numerical risks, and the problem becomes an elevator pitch that everybody understands.

Pericarditis and arrhythmia? Purely a disease problem. This looks very good for the vaccine. This is what you WANT with a vaccine – to AVOID some problem of the disease. BUT – can we trust those numbers?

I think so, and I think that Gateway Pundit got burned by looking at COMMENTS on a blog post explaining the Nature study.

LINK: https://jamescintolo.substack.com/p/new-bombshell-myocarditis-study-out

This is a GREAT post – here is the conclusion:


 THE TAKEAWAY

Public health policy in the USA and UK need to change fast. As a side note, if you listen to the mainstream media enough they’ll have you believing myocarditis is a mild symptom. Let me be clear, by definition, symptoms requiring hospitalization are defined as severe. What’s more, the average mortality rate of non-fulminant myocarditis is nearly 56% which is experienced within 3-10 years. Sadly, that is a consequence of the likely heart failure that develops after the acute phase of myocarditis has resolved. See picture below 👇🏻

All things considered, it is clear that individuals under 40 are at a high risk of experiencing vaccine induced myocarditis. The good news is, there are ways to deal with this. More specifically, increasing the time between the first and second dose, not giving boosters to all healthy individuals under 40, pausing Moderna for many under 30, and seeking the guidance of other countries. All of that makes for better public health policy and positive health outcomes. To finish, I will leave you with the words of a wise man, “Health care is vital to all of us some of the time, but public health is vital to all of us all of the time”. – C. Everett Koop


Wolf again.

Now – in the comments, somebody mentioned the “1% issue”, and I suspect this is where GWP picked it up. Sadly, the comment author deleted and restated their comment, probably after realizing it had spawned a widely read article.

Here is the replacement comment, with replies.


zuFpM5*M6 hr ago I erased my previous comment. The closer I look at this study, the more it freaks me out.

They compare vaxxed to vaxxed+covid and then declare covid is worse, but they measure rates of myocarditis/pericarditis in post covid with troponin levels and in post vaxx with hospitalization rates. Hmmmm

They don’t include any control group of unvaxxed. The vaxx+covid group should be compared to unvaxx+covid to determine the actual rate of post covid heart issues. This is not done that I can tell?

The vaccinated showed a 1% hospitalization rate for cardiac arrhythmia with ~385,000 in the period up to 28 days post vaccination. I tried to look up population rates of hospitalization and found some old news articles discussing ~350,000-500,000 hospitalizations annually for ‘atrial fibrillation’ for the entire US population. So a group of vaccinated in UK blew out the entire US annual budget of arrhythmia hospitalizations in a couple month period? And that isn’t a highlighted part of the research results but instead they compare only within the vaccinated group broken out by short temporal periods? Isn’t the most important thing the vaccinated versus background normal rate?

I begin to think this whole study was gamed to get vaccinated rates of these issues versus supposed covid rates so they could continue to say vaccines are safer, when the actual #s are showing a horrific rise in these issues. It is a preemptive narrative shaping attempt.

I am not a doctor, researcher or number cruncher, so if I am misunderstanding this, I would be interested to hear how.
br143 hr ago There’s no way to sugar coat the study.

Of the ~385,000 people with arrhythmia, 10.3% had a positive Covid-19 test, and 7.7% tested positive at some point prior to vaccination.

Even if you remove 18% of the total, that’s still an awful lot of people with arrhythmia. I suppose most of us have some form of arrhythmia at some time in our lives, but how many of us are treated in hospital?
zuFpM5*M3 hr ago Yes. I would not subtract them either. I feel that there would be a covid risk increase + vaccine risk increase + covid/vaccine interaction risk increase to account for. None of which can be done without estimating the covid risk increase by comparing with non-vaccinated covid patients.

This is where they lost me. They’re just tossing out “maybes”. Nothing jumps out at me as likely to change the result. I can even add my own experience with cardiovascular issues from the disease. They’re REAL. Very unlikely that the vaccines and disease would FLIP on the relative risks of arrhythmia.

Score 1 for the vaccines.

BACK TO THE TRUMP ISSUE.


Benefits of the Vaccine Admitted by Our Side

There is a GREAT video by Geert Vanden Bossche that I keep pushing, because it is one of the clearest explanations of why “leaky mass vaccination” is a bad idea. Note that this is from a pro-vaxxer who has indeed worked with vaccines for his whole career, and is a former member of GAVI.

He just demands good vaccines, and good public vaccination policy.

Now – if you jump to around 4:30 in the video, you can hear him list the positives of the clot shot. HOWEVER, it may be better to just invest some of your time in that 4 1/2 minutes where he warms up to that point, to understand that he’s putting the positives AND the negatives in context, and looking at the bigger picture to recommend that we NOT mass-vaccinate.

He is saying that we should NOT mass-vaccinate IN SPITE OF the benefits that he lists and explains.

  • a decrease of disease in many countries
  • decline of morbidity and mortality rates
  • less illness in people who got vaccinated
  • severe disease is resisted even when vaccinees are infected with variants
  • they will shed much less virus than the unvaccinated, even when infected with variants
  • seropositivity rates are increasing in the population thanks to vaccination

But THAT is where he begins to disagree with mass vaccination. He states that we will NOT reach herd immunity, due to variants, and he explains this fully.


Global Problems of Sub-Optimal Mass Vaccination

At 28:00 minutes, Geert explains what we need to do – which is NOT what public officials are doing.

The current mass vaccination program will make things worse, in the long term. Geert explains then the kinds of vaccines we really need – vaccines which can both generate sterilizing immunity, AND which prime the immune systems of their recipients toward cellular immunity.

Yeah, it’s a bit of a tough goal, but it’s realistic toward the challenges of the China virus, and honest about what we need to do.

So what does this mean about the benefits of the vaccine?

THEY ARE REAL, BUT THEY ARE SHORT-SIGHTED. And they are accompanied by risks. Not just to the vaccinees, but to ALL OF US ON THIS PLANET.

According to Geert, continued vaccination is going to HARM vaccinees, relative to the unvaccinated, who will need to avoid virus-shedding vaccinees. At that point, recoverees may be in the best position of all, but still – not great. ALL of us will be in trouble from the virus which will escape the vaccines.

Geert also explains how we can prove that he is correct – by looking at the mutations in the virus which is shed from vaccinees, which will show selection for more infectious variants, if he is correct.

Now – this is a GREAT interview of Geert by Dana Loesch, who looks more and more like Sandra Bullock for some reason, but what the heck – the shotgun shells on her microphone setup are EXCELLENT, very non-Bullock, and she gets a FANTASTIC explanation of the problem from Geert.

Geert actually talks about Omicron, and the DANGER of it potentially evolving to be MORE SEVERE.

Take a listen!

Does Trump know this stuff? I don’t know.

I personally believe that Geert is right. I am now of the opinion that most of what we are hearing from Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, and Geert Vanden Bossche is true, but that each one has to give a little toward the ultimate truth.

What does that look like to me?

  • Natural immunity is NOT permanent or complete toward other variants
  • Natural immunity is better than the vaccines, generally speaking, but not bulletproof
  • Untreated COVID is a loser relative to the vaccines, but treated COVID is a winner
  • McCullough’s natural immunity prediction based on SARS1 may be too confident
  • Malone’s whistleblower on more shedding by vaccinees may have been wrong or disinformation
  • Geert’s vax-brag of less shedding by vaccinees may have been too kind and not skeptical enough
  • We have to stop pushing the vaccines, for the good of humanity
  • We have to allow the vaccines to continue, at an acceptably lower rate, for research
  • We have to allow vaccines to change faster, to keep up with mutations, IF and only IF this will not PUSH the virus to mutate and select faster (immune pressure must be low enough)
  • We have to pursue the superior vaccines that Geert is specifying
  • We have to use infection, treatment, and recovery as a big gun to reach herd immunity
  • We have to let COVID burn out of epidemic status, to reach a treatable endemic status
  • We cannot do that with mass vaccination, so mandates must cease promptly and completely
  • Joe Biden and CDC must be stopped – by military power if need be – if they will not end the crazy mandates

Yeah, you heard me. We can’t let this demented bozo, backed by an evil Obama and China, make COVID worse by mass vaccination. Mandates are making things worse.


Freedom, Vaccines and Morality

Trump may not understand Geert Vanden Bossche’s warning, but if we set that aside as an unknown, you can understand where Trump is coming from.

If we want freedom, we have to let other people make stupid choices that affect them most of all. Vaccination is, in fact, one of those things. Indeed, it is by US seeing it that way, that I believe we will end this nightmare of division which PUMPS UP the vaxxies and the crazy mandates.

In the same way that there are vaxxies who now are defending OUR freedom to be unvaccinated, I believe we have to defend the right of people to stupidly (or smartly) take the vaccine. However, we MUST get the rate of vaccination DOWN below the level where immune pressure from the vaccine creates more and more infectious variants.


The FIRST thing is not to take the vaccine yourself, or give it to your children.

The SECOND thing is to fight for an end to mandates.

The THIRD thing is to fight for BETTER vaccines, and to expand belief that the current vaccines are NOT GOOD ENOUGH, and are of the WRONG TYPE. Make the vaxxies demand better, not defend bad vaxxes.

The FOURTH thing is to spread the message that the “socially responsible thing to do” is to support Vanden Bossche’s position, that NOT taking the vaccine NOW is what will ultimately “save grandma”.

The last one is a hard sell, with FAKE NEWS pumping vaccine stupidity, but hey – we’ve fought tougher battles already.


So what about Trump?

Well, he is not in the position to know or respond to the “Geert Vanden Bossche Question”. Not yet. It is only when that issue becomes BURNING HOT, that Trump will be able to smartly push FORWARD from the current stupid CLOT SHOTS.

We will have to RAISE VACCINE CONSCIOUSNESS to levels of understanding that SUBVERT FAKE NEWS. We can only do that by getting most of the vaxxies on our side – to demand BETTER vaccines.

If they want to be guinea pigs – GREAT. They can be heroes, and try the deadly experimental vaccines. But we should NOT be forcing all of humanity to be part of a BAD and MISGUIDED experiment.

And the JOKERS who are allegedly running our military need to understand this. Virtue signals which kill troops, even if slowly and quietly, where nobody can see them, are NOT ACTUALLY VIRTUOUS. I appreciate them kicking out the sane ones who understand that the current bad clot shots may cripple readiness at some point, rather than forcibly injecting them. We WILL have a reserve of trained people who are not destroyed by China and Biden, no matter what China’s coming chess moves. Thank you for that. But as for everything else – there could have been push-back against communism, instead of acquiescence.

Yes, we had to be shown. But I’m not sure showing us subservience to a COUP and CHINA and FAKE NEWS isn’t undoing half of the good stuff.

But this as well. If you guys delivered Omicron on purpose, thanks. It LOOKS like it may be working.

Merry Christmas!

W

COVID-19: New Treatment Protocol and Important Contraindications

This is a very important video you don’t want to miss. It just came out, and the doctor is a guy I’ve been following. He chooses his words carefully, to stay inside the establishment where he can publish some of the top papers, but he speaks the truth at all times.

Don’t let the video title fool you – the doc is much more “reserved” than big scary death headlines, but that is EXACTLY WHAT HE TALKS ABOUT.

I picked this interview up HERE:

LINK: https://conservativeplaybook.com/2021/05/08/cdc-as-many-people-have-died-from-covid-19-vaccines-as-all-vaccines-in-last-20-years-combined/

The Rumble video is located HERE:

LINK: https://rumble.com/vgjw85-covid-shot-killing-large-numbers-warns-top-covid-doctor-peter-mccullough.html

Here are just a few things to listen for:

  • COVID-19 is dying down because of early treatment
  • vaccination is only one of 4 pillars of dealing with an epidemic
  • media has pretended like only 2 of the 4 pillars exist
  • COVID recoverees likely have AT LEAST 17 YEARS OF IMMUNITY – like victims of SARS-1
  • COVID recoverees should NOT get the vaccine
  • COVID recoverees have “gold star immunity” – should get highest grade passports
  • COVID recoverees who get vaxxed have 2-3 times MORE adverse effects
  • vaxxing recoverees is stupid and wrong
  • pregnant, wanting to have kids, anybody EXCLUDED from clinical trials should NOT get vaccines
  • vaccines are NOT FDA-approved
  • nobody has to get vaccines – THEY’RE NOT FDA APPROVED – they’re “available”
  • the spike protein vaccines are only about 70% effective in preventing COVID in reality
  • many (half or more) of his COVID patients have been vaxxed
  • risk of infection is below 1% – not very serious
  • spike protein vaccines only protect against spike protein, not the other parts of the virus
  • go to https://www.openvaers.com/ to search on vaccine adverse effects EASILY
  • there’s a new outpatient protocol for treatment which starts off with antibodies LIKE TRUMP GOT
  • the new protocol then follows up with C, D, zinc, quercetin, HCQ, budesonide, etc.
  • the new protocol is available by telemedicine
  • COVID is going to become a simple normal risk like pneumonia or flu – BACK TO NORMAL
  • his non-expert opinion (but expert opinion of some colleagues) is bioweapon
  • not a normal virus in his medical opinion
  • much more

As you can see, there is some big stuff there.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED LISTEN!

W

PS – if you liked that, here is another great video where he reveals a LOT!

LINK: https://rumble.com/vdsy67-asia-pacific-today.-early-treatment-for-covid-19-reduces-deaths-with-dr-pet.html