Health Friday 3.14.2025 Open Thread: Heart Issues After COVID-19 “Vaccination”: And About the Virus Itself

The above free image of heart shapes is courtesy of iStock and Google Images.

Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. As today’s post speaks about the disaster of COVID-19 (the COVID-19 virus itself, and the COVID-19 “vaccines”), Yours Truly dedicates it to the memory of all persons, of whatever age or location, who have passed away from the negative effects of these lab-created bioweapons.

There are Important Wolf Moon Notifications; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. NOTE: Yours Truly has checked today’s offering for any AI-generated content. To the best of my knowledge and belief, there is none. Also: if readers wish to post anything in the discussion thread for today’s offering that is AI-generated, they must cite their source.

Today’s post may be regarded as a “narrow-focus” offering, one of a “mini-series.” This first “narrow-focus” offering regards the inducement of cardiac issues after COVID-19 “vaccination”; and, the potential for cardiac issues also induced from an infection of the COVID-19 virus itself. Yours Truly begins here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-fatal-malignant-cardiac, “NEW STUDY — Fatal Malignant Cardiac Tumors Following COVID-19 mRNA Injection”, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 6 March 2025. The paper that is cited in the article is here: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf009, “Heart-breaking tumours: a case series of malignant pericardial effusion”, Abdur Rahman Mirza, et al., 18 January 2025. The paper is also found here: https://academic.oup.com/ehjcr/article/9/3/ytaf009/7960074. Below are screenshots of the Introduction of the paper; followed by a screenshot of the graphic of the paper that traces the “journey of pericarditis”:

And, the final portion of the Discussion section of the paper:

Note the mention of “diagnostic bias” regarding whether or not a cardiac issue presents after the patient has been COVID-19 “vaccinated.” In Yours Truly’s opinion, the young physician who is the lead author of the cited paper has likely not studied how the COVID-19 “vaccines” affect the heart (for example, this article: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”, Michael Palmer, MD, and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD); has likely not read the BNT162b2 5.3.6 Postmarketing Experience report that Pfizer-BioNTech gave to the FDA in April 2021 (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf); and, has likely not read any of the posts that Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, has on his website (https://www.thefocalpoints.com/.) One suspects that many other physicians have not read these items, either.

Turning to the Hulscher article on The Focal Points blog, cited above: It is known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, cause pericarditis, a type of inflammation involving the heart (please refer to the BNT162b2 Postmarketing Experience report cited above, page 36 of the report, in the Appendix 1. List of Adverse Events of Special Interest section of said report.) The Cleveland Clinic has an article on pericarditis, found here: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/17353-pericarditis. Below is a screenshot from the Cleveland Clinic article:

It is also known that the COVID-19 “vaccines” can, and do, cause myocarditis (another type of cardiac inflammation.) Both pericarditis and myocarditis can, and do, cause permanent damage to the heart. Both pericarditis and myocarditis can ultimately result in the death of the patient. However, the COVID-19 “vaccines” contain BOTH the ingredients of the original Wuhan Hu1 virus (SARS-CoV-2 virus, aka COVID-19 virus), AND lab “enhancements” (dangerous lipid nanoparticles; N1-methylpseudouridine; “loose DNA” from the manufacturing process; a piece of the SV40 African Green Monkey cancer promoter gene code) — that make the COVID-19 “vaccines” much more dangerous and/or deadly to the cardiac system of the “vaccinated” person. There is more new information on this situation (thank you to Valerie Curren): https://slaynews.com/news/epidemiologist-new-data-linking-covid-vaccines-global-heart-death-surge/, by Frank Bergman, 1 March 2025. The paper linked in the article is found here: https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.12.1039909, “Risk stratification for future cardiac arrest after COVID-19 vaccination”, Peter A. McCullough, MD, and Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, 26 February 2025. Below are two screenshots from the paper: the Abstract; and, the McCullough Protocol for spike protein detoxification:

Note the clear statement that cardiac issues can appear years after the person is COVID-19 “vaccinated.”

And, the McCullough Protocol:

Yours Truly finds it ** interesting ** that the above paper was given a “Grade C” for “scientific quality” by the paper’s reviewers, none of whom are identified except by their initials.

**** However, malignant pericardial effusion is a form of cardiac cancer. It is not an inflammation. Below is a screenshot from the National Cancer Institute definition of this condition (https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/malignant-pericardial-effusion):

Malignant pericardial effusion is the subject of the Mirza, et al., paper cited above in today’s post.

**** On the other hand, the COVID-19 virus itself can cause cardiac issues in persons who contract an infection of said virus. The following paper is from July 2020, well before any COVID-19 “vaccines” was granted an Emergency Use Authorization in any country: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-020-0413-9, “COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: from basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives”, Masataka Nishiga, et al., 20 July 2020. This paper is a good source of information regarding how the COVID-19 virus itself works; and, how this virus can affect the cardiovascular system. A screenshot of the Abstract of the paper is below:

Another paper, also from 2020, well before any COVID-19 “vaccine” was granted an EUA, regards how the COVID-19 virus itself can affect the cardiovascular system: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7095524/, “COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system”, Yi-Tong Ma, et al., 5 March 2020. Yours Truly finds it ** interesting ** that the authors of this paper are affiliated with either the Wuhan Institute of Virology, or to medical facilities linked to the People’s Liberation Army (all CCP.) Below is a screenshot from the Background section of the paper:

The following article has more information on the ACE2 receptors in the human body: https://www.cas.org/resources/cas-insights/ace2-covid-19-target, “ACE2: Targeting a potentially important receptor in disease pathogensis”, by Angela Zhou, 15 December 2022. Below is a screenshot from this article:

The point here is that BOTH the COVID-19 virus itself (aka SARS-CoV-2), AND the COVID-19 “vaccines” (since these injectables contain SARS-CoV-2), target and attack the ACE2 receptor cells in the human body.

Yours Truly will again emphasize that the COVID-19 virus itself, AND the COVID-19 “vaccines”, were BOTH designed to cause as much damage to the human body as possible. They are BOTH lab-created bioweapons. The COVID-19 virus is not “just another type of virus.” The COVID-19 “vaccines” were designed to be capable of “shedding” elements of these injectables onto other persons (whether those persons are “vaccinated”, or not.) What is of utmost importance is that all people, “vaccinated” or not, must be doing all that is possible to have, and to maintain, the highest degree of personal health. The COVID-19 “vaccines” must be removed from use worldwide — now.

THERE. MUST. BE. JUSTICE.

Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA

Yes, Virginia, There Really is a Virus, and Here are the Pictures

You may or may not recall my earlier post in defense of the basic idea that viruses are real things, substantially as described, and are not merely a counterfeit construct of the now-obvious fake science, which is clearly inflicted upon us by the liars in charge.

That post was made in response to what I believe is a discreditation campaign of “there is no virus”, which has been promoted within the community of COVID and vaccine skeptics, as well as within the good company of those highly observant election skeptics (see Patrick Gunnels), by the DNC, CIA, CCP, WEF and other corrupt globalist organizations.

This idea of pushing us too far, as skeptics, is very much like what they did to protesters on January Sixth. Pushing the enemy too far is a “go-to” principle in their arsenal of shameful abuse of science, media, and social media. It is an affront to truth and God, but they don’t care.

If you are not familiar with my prior rebuttal of the key points of the there is no virus campaign, I am including the entire article by reference, and urge you to read it – either now, or later, in case you have any doubts about the discrete reality, ready separability, and PHYSICAL ISOLATION of viruses.

Yes, Virginia, There is a Virus

I will try to keep this brief – although that is hard, because I’m fighting against people’s “feelings” instead of facts. When the other side LIES all the time, it creates a “feeling” that they’re lying about everything. Yes, they ARE lying about everything – but the lies are often very sophisticated, being composed of …

The “there is no virus” campaign followed shortly on the heels of several other discreditation operations, including the highly successful “magnetic vaccines” campaign. Having an actual scientific interest in magnetism, I spent a couple of weeks debunking this campaign, which involved my actually taking it very seriously as a starting point. The whole experience of basic scientific discovery was refreshing and fun, and led me to a great understanding of how the enemy works. Several posts resulted.

The Magnetism Challenge: Part I

Wherein we examine, in something like “MythBusters” style, the dubious “Magnet Challenge”, without relying (too much) on the anti-scientific crutch of scientific authority First, a confession. The main reason I am attracted to these videos of people sticking magnets to the COVID vaccination injection sites on their shoulders, is that I love to watch normal …

The Magnetism Challenge: Part II – Scientific Disinformation During the COVID-19 Narrative Collapse

Wherein we look at how the COVID scammers are now using “magnetic” disinformation to try to escape justice for REAL abuse of liposome biotechnology to achieve [most likely contraceptive] vaccine persistence and migration. TL;DR – after mRNA vaccine persistence and anatomical migration were revealed in leaked Pfizer data, explaining “shedding” via persistent liposomes, the COVID …

The Magnetism Challenge: Part III – Suramin: A Lesson in Discreditation of Dissident Scientists and Science

This is for the historical record. I hope that this analysis gets to the “dissident scientists” involved, but even if it never does, future historians will get a powerful look at what I call “Fake Science” – the establishment’s phony, deceptive and controlled scientific complex – and how infiltration, control, and discreditation of dissident populist …

The Magnetism Challenge: Part IV – Spanish-Made Lots of Moderna Vaccine with Magnetic Metallic Contaminants Caught by Japanese Health Ministry

OK. Something is definitely going on. Hat tip to RF121 for finding this. Somebody call Dr. Tenpenny’s lawyer. The Daily Mail may actually owe Dr. Tenpenny and Stew Peters an apology. Just in case Twitter deletes that tweet, here’s an image. So – is this REAL? YES. Most of this story is in Japanese, but …

I also did a post on why FREE SPEECH needs to be tolerant of people who purvey “disinformation”, and particularly those who are under frequent and active discreditation attacks.

Truth Social and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny – a Lesson in Dealing with “Disinformation”

I will try to keep this short. I was very shocked, recently, to find that Dr. Sherry Tenpenny was banned from Truth Social for calling the mRNA COVID vaccines “bioweapons”. Dr. Tenpenny commented back. Let’s take a closer look at that! I can tell you this – by the time I saw this, Dr. Tenpenny …

Thus, don’t get me wrong – I will protect the free speech of both the malicious and innocent purveyors of “misinformation”, “disinformation”, “malinformation”, or whatever – where “whatever” frequently includes TRUTH NOT YET RECOGNIZED. And when there is no truth to be recognized, I find it very important that free speech REMAIN ONLINE, if only to serve as a REFERENCE FOR CORRECTION.

So in the spirit of loving correction of my “no virus” friends, let me begin.

In November of 2022, our wonderful champion of truth in medicine, Dr. Peter McCullough – his nose constantly in the scientific literature – noticed and wrote a post (image below) about a FANTASTIC paper, fully capable of putting to rest the “no virus” position for most honest skeptics.

McCullough even included a handy image, which I reproduce here, in fair use, for your learned examination.

This entire paper is worth digging into. For the benefit of the low-vision, I recommend going directly to the paper (title included below) at these links:

Electron cryotomography of SARS-CoV-2 virions reveals cylinder-shaped particles with a double layer RNP assembly

LINK: https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04183-1

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/hutcQ

The basic idea of the paper is that the researchers FROZE a liquid suspension of the isolated (yes) virus, and then did a very advanced form of electron microscopy on it, completely analogous to the CAT scan they do on you in the hospital, using X-rays. In this fashion, they got amazing PICTURES OF THE VIRUS.

One of the great things that happened here, which absolutely STINKS of real science, is that the researchers didn’t find what everybody expected.

The Earth may be “round”, but the virus is FLAT.

Literally. The virus is only round in two of its three dimensions. It’s shaped like a TABLET, not a sphere.

Hamburger patties. Hamburgers. Oreos. Or even my namesake, MOON PIES.

But consider the ABSTRACT of the paper, and in particular, what I’ve put in BOLD:

SARS-CoV-2 is a lipid-enveloped Betacoronavirus and cause of the Covid-19 pandemic. To study the three-dimensional architecture of the virus, we perform electron cryotomography (cryo-ET) on SARS-Cov-2 virions and three variants revealing particles of regular cylindrical morphology. The ribonucleoprotein particles packaging the genome in the virion interior form a dense, double layer assembly with a cylindrical shape related to the overall particle morphology. This organisation suggests structural interactions important to virus assembly.

A “double layer assembly”?

So that means a DOUBLE-LAYER MOON PIE!

OK – maybe without the middle layer of CARDBOARD that is clearly what moon pies are made of, but still – TWO LAYERS of RNA (or more accurately RNA + nucleoprotein) in the middle.

You can see that very clearly in this graphic from the paper.

Coiled up badly flat like a damned garden hose in a round box. Who’da thunk?

Now – I urge you all to click on THE LINK FOR THE PAPER and skim through it. You will spot ALL of the following listed things, and it will give you a chance to practice reading the scientific literature for yourselves.

In no particular order or location (look everywhere), you will find that…..

isolation of the virus is described
agreement with prior work is described
disagreement with prior work is described
how the spike protein is distributed is described
a proof that the viruses were not “squooshed” flat is given
a way to make the viruses “lay flat” is described
several different variants are compared
the attachment of the spike protein was found to be ########
the size of the spike protein was verified (how?)
the porcupines stay the same size, while the number and type of quills may vary
there is speculation about WHY the structure is what it is
the work was done in #######
the peer review was done by at least some number of people
different proteins that make up the structure are named

There is a lot more, but I’m going to let YOU discover that.

Now – I am not saying that all skeptics of good faith will be convinced by this evidence, but I believe that most WILL be convinced.

I go back to what Dr. McCullough posted.

The objections to the reality of viruses are referenced in bold; McCullough’s reasoning to the contrary is briefly given in italics, and his final argument in shown in BOTH.

The endless frustrations of the SARS-CoV-2 crisis and pandemic response has led some to push back denying existence of the virus altogether. Laboratory methods in virology are well accepted and utilize a series of experiments to demonstrate cellular invasion, replication, transfer and repeated infection. Whole genomic sequencing has aided in identification of variants and subvariants and helped greatly in forecasting what is coming next. The CDC Nowcast system is an excellent application of targeted sequencing of viral samples.[i] Nonetheless, some have said if SARS-CoV-2 cannot be cultured like a bacteria and “isolated” then it does not exist. I have always responded that the principles of laboratory virology, sequencing, and the mass production of viruses such as that done by the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems are concrete processes that rely on the presence of the virus.[ii] My understanding from the body of medical literature and firsthand clinical experience are consistent with the conclusion that COVID-19 is indeed a unique illness distinguishable from influenza and other viral infections. I have always been impressed with the absence of bacterial superinfection and micro- and macro-thrombosis being features that separate COVID-19 from influenza and other viral syndromes. Calder, et al, at the Francis Crick Institute has gone a step farther with advanced forms of electron microscopy to see the virus up close and personal. A picture speaks a thousand words and should help even the most skeptical “viral denier” come onto the rational team that is trying to treat high risk patients, end ridiculous contagion control measures, and bring our world back to normal.

Now, I will join the “deniers” in objecting to the life-saving “virtue signal” that good Dr. McCullough uses to conclude his argument, but I will agree completely – the pictures, supported by an excellent description of how they were gotten, is convincing – at least to me.

IF one is willing to accept the reality of the virus, then there is a huge bonus that comes with it. We now have strong reason to believe that the World Economic Forum (WEF) – a nation-controlling cult of transhumanism – is behind the virus and the vaccines, in pursuit of their bizarre dream of “hacking the genome“. I will be posting a deep dive on that conspiracy very soon. You can get previews on my Twitter timeline. When you read that post, strongly consider getting fully on the “there really is a virus” train, because it does lead somewhere, and helps to explain why WEF did what they did.

Until then, stay skeptical, stay ethical, and most of all, stay ethically skeptical!

W

NOT A VIRUS! They’re homemade pomegranate moon pies!

Wilde, Vicki; Wilde In The Kitchen, Pomegranate Moon Pies, June 28, 2011.

Genomic DNA Incorporation of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Explained by Unique Hidden Key to Nucleus and Spike’s Surprising Ability to Transport mRNA

This is SO HUGE. I must explain this to you.

TL;DR – The spike protein not only contains a special sequence that allows it into the cell nucleus – it also has an ability to bring its own spike mRNA sequence with it. Both features appear to be unique among coronaviruses. The features explain genomic incorporation found for both the virus and the vaccines. The special key and the mRNA shepherding can be considered to be defects in any spike vaccine that has them.

¡Muy explosivo!

Due to comments by WSB and Valerie Curren, I realized that I had to do this post.

Also, NONE of the “bigs” are talking about this, but it is HUGE, if only people will read the paper.

By sheer luck, I was alerted to this new development ASAP on Twitter.

A follower of mine, who I had followed back, posted on Twitter the link to a paper with this title:

Nuclear translocation of spike mRNA and protein is a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2

I immediately realized what this was about.

It’s about how the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) virus spike protein and its mRNA get into the cell nucleus – an extremely important point which WSB has been hitting on over and over. It’s very important, because THAT is how “genomic incorporation” happens. And genomic incorporation is what HIV does – what retroviruses do. They “get into” the DNA and leave cookies, so to speak.

Sometimes, they leave enough cookies, that the whole virus comes back out, fully functional, and ready to infect. Sometimes, they only leave enough junk in the DNA to cause some damage. Sometimes, they leave enough to change us – and that is why human DNA is filled with “viral leftovers”.

In principle, mRNA technology should NOT do this. We were TOLD that mRNA technology could not do this. But somebody LIED TO US. And not only that – NOBODY – from Bill Gates on down – ever apologized to us about lying, or even about just “being mistaken”.

We’ll get to that later.

You will recall that there are two papers I love to mention.

One is the “Jaenisch paper”, which describes how the SARS-CoV-2 virus manages to get some of its genetic instructions for the spike protein into the DNA of cells.

LINK: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/XWC52

The other is the “De Marinis paper”, which describes how the Pfizer vaccine did the same thing to human liver cells in vitro – meaning that in an experiment using cells in culture, the Pfizer vaccine got its mRNA sequences into the DNA genetic material of human liver cells, and it did so in a matter of minutes.

McCullough got in a lot of trouble with Twitter for posting this, even though it was utterly true. Now we know that the government was trying to shut it down. They likely used the technicality of McCullough’s very VALID speculation (stated as speculation and concern), which turned out to be correct, IMSO.

LINK: https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73

LINK: https://portal.research.lu.se/en/publications/intracellular-reverse-transcription-of-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-m

These papers explain ALMOST everything. When I saw the Jaenisch paper, I predicted that we would see the De Marinis paper. MEANING – when I saw that the virus could get mRNA into the DNA, I predicted that the vaccine might get its mRNA into the DNA, too. And yes, I was right. Clearly others thought the same thing, and decided to investigate.

Now, after the De Marinis paper, it seemed very obvious to me that one did not need any kind of special conditions or reverse transcription promoters to get the vaccine mRNA to incorporate.

That bothered me, and I suspected, at the time, that MAYBE – just maybe – the spike protein ITSELF was somehow causing genomic incorporation – that it functioned as a kind of reverse transcription promoter.

Well, it sure looks like that is the case.

According to the discoveries revealed in the new paper, which I have taken to calling the “Mehedi paper”, there is a special sequence in the spike protein that acts like a “key to the nucleus” – and this sequence is found in NO other coronavirus spike protein.

LINK: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1073789/full

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/kW9Bd

Here is the abstract of the new paper.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes severe pathophysiology in vulnerable older populations and appears to be highly pathogenic and more transmissible than other coronaviruses. The spike (S) protein appears to be a major pathogenic factor that contributes to the unique pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2. Although the S protein is a surface transmembrane type 1 glycoprotein, it has been predicted to be translocated into the nucleus due to the novel nuclear localization signal (NLS) “PRRARSV,” which is absent from the S protein of other coronaviruses. Indeed, S proteins translocate into the nucleus in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. S mRNAs also translocate into the nucleus. S mRNA colocalizes with S protein, aiding the nuclear translocation of S mRNA. While nuclear translocation of nucleoprotein (N) has been shown in many coronaviruses, the nuclear translocation of both S mRNA and S protein reveals a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2.

Let me put that in plainer English.

COVID-19 really hurts old people and seems to be both deadlier and easier to catch than other coronaviruses. The spike protein seems to be why. Although the spike protein is a surface protein that normally would not do this, it might be predicted to get into the cell nucleus because it has a special sequence “PRRARSV,” a known key to the nucleus which appears in no other coronavirus. Sure enough, the COVID spike protein gets into the nucleus of infected cells. What’s more, the mRNA for COVID spike protein also gets into the nucleus. What happens is that the spike mRNA collects near the spike protein, which helps it get in. While a different protein called the “nucleoprotein” of many coronaviruses is known to get into the nucleus of cells, the penetration of the cell nucleus by BOTH the spike protein AND the mRNA for it, seems to be a unique new feature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Once you read it in plain English, it’s much more mind-blowing.

Now – I really recommend that you read the rest of the paper, but it’s really just technical details about what was mentioned in the abstract. Those details can help you gauge the expectedness or unexpectedness of things, but I have tried to do that as best as I could in the translation.

At this point, you should have all kinds of questions.

could this defect of the vaccines have been predicted?
should it have been predicted?
did the Chinese know this when they sent us the sequence?
did we know it when we got the sequence?
would NOT using the full spike protein have prevented this?
if so, why did we use the full spike protein anyway?
would the “forbidden” Winfried Stöcker RBD vaccine have avoided this?
if so, why was his vaccine suppressed by the German government?
does this affect the Peter Hotez vaccine, Corbevax?
if not, why didn’t his vaccine get promoted through the process quicker?
is nuclear penetration a common problem with mRNA technology?
how did this “key” get into the sequence? Naturally or not?
could “directed evolution” of the spike have yielded this?
why wasn’t this clear from the moment we got the sequence?
did people know this and hide the information?
were key people like Bill Gates (their side) and Robert Malone (our side) aware of this possibility?

The last question is a gift to WSB and her virologist friend. I am by default a defender of Dr. Malone, but WSB and her friend are long-time skeptics of the technology, and thus of Dr. Malone. In all fairness, I think we have to ask EVERYBODY the same questions.

Did people KNOW that mRNA technology had this vulnerability?
Does this look any more like an engineered bioweapon, designed to get into the nucleus?
Was this thing made by nature, by people, or by somebody with more advanced technology?
What is the purpose of getting into the nucleus, if it is designed to do that?

That should be enough. I will leave some links to prior comments I have made, in an appendix, hopefully added later.

Thank you.

W

John Fink and James Coburn discuss case in a scene from the film ‘The Carey Treatment’, 1972. (Photo by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Getty Images)

PS – A great interview of our site mascot!

https://thehollywoodinterview.blogspot.com/2008/02/james-coburn-hollywood-interview.html

Dear KMAG: 20220228 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Microwave Monday / Google Is Now Anti-Science / mRNA Vaccines Really Do Change Your DNA

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

Get your rest, Trumpy Bear! You’re needed in WASHINGTON, DC!!!

Vladdy Bear and Winnie The Pooh are making Sleepy Creepy Joe look like a punching bag!

The Business At Hand

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But we’re ON A ROLL.

The Rules

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.

The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

Gonna be quick this time.

SO….. [ENGAGE BOILERPLATE…..]

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

Those who cannot deal with this easy requirement will be forced to jump the hoops of moderation, so that specific comments impugning other posters and violating the minimal rules can be sorted out and tossed in the trash.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

That includes the life skill of just ignoring certain other posters.

We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).

We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

After his speech at CPAC, I think it’s quite clear that praying for President Trump’s return to the White House is indeed praying for our enemies, who are too messed up to realize how much better off they would be under a Trump presidency.

MUSICAL INTERLUDE

For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.

Microwave Monday reminds me of this song from back in the day.

ENJOY!

This right here is the stiffest dose of teased-out 80s chick hair you are EVER going to get.

And if you want to see it with 2008 hair….

And then there’s an outdoorsy 2014 version which has a really great “live” feel…..

But how about a 2021 version with just Susanna Hoffs and a string section?

But if you’re still feeling like it’s all unfamiliar, here’s the original video!

Yeah – that’s more like it!

Call To Battle (H/T Sundance)

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.

…..and now for…..

Microwave Monday

After recent discussion of Havana Syndrome, and the possibility that it involves electromagnetic radiation (and in particular microwaves), I have decided that we all need to LEVEL UP our gut-level understanding of the electromagnetic spectrum – even beyond what Steve has done with his explanation of the science behind it.

This will also help us deal with both the REALITIES and DISINFORMATION of 5G telecom.

I will be doing this by giving you all a bunch of INFOGRAPHICS to get started.

Steve got us started HERE, in his 8th science lesson on LIGHT.

2021·06·19 Joe Biden Didn’t Win Daily Thread

You may remember some of this stuff….. (CLICK TO ENLARGE)

Let’s start breaking up that electromagnetic continuum into REGIONS that have NAMES.

You can see that microwaves lie between RADIO and INFRARED.

Let’s look even more closely at those groups.

We can even start breaking those radio and microwave regions down into BANDS that you are all familiar with.

Here you can start to get a feel for the SIZE OF THE WAVES versus objects and frequencies.

The SIZE OF WAVES and WHAT THEY AFFECT actually matters – although it’s not simple.

Megahertz, gigahertz, teraherz, and petahertz are all there.

You can really see it more easily in the following infographic.

You can easily see how we have made “radio devices” push farther and farther away from the very SAFE “radio” region, through television, mobile phones, and WiFi, closer and closer to the microwave and infrared radiation that constitutes COOKING MICROWAVES and RADIANT HEAT ITSELF.

And as you can see here, many technologies emit electromagnetic radiation – and some more than you may have realized.

So where are the 5G frequencies? Please be aware that there is constant change in this stuff, so that these infographics may be slightly out of date. Do not let that deter you – minor changes don’t NIX any issues of the basic range in which 5G operates, unless specifics of the science are given.

Use COMMON SENSE.

Let’s zoom in a bit.

Note that the above is just the US – other countries use different regions.

Here is more detail on European and US 5G.

Much of this is SQUARELY in the microwave region. From Wikipedia, we’re basically talking 300 MHz to 300 GHz.

Now let’s start looking at ALLEGED but possibly REAL health effects of EMR in the microwave region, which may VARY ACROSS THE REGION.

Remember also that DOSAGE MATTERS – like anything else.

You have to squint to see the next infographic, but look at “Biological Effect”.

It depends strongly on FREQUENCY / WAVELENGTH.

This is a very good listen. This lady is also a climate dupe, but she will get you to realize that your microwave devices may actually be doing to YOUR MEAT what microwaves normally do to YOUR MEAT, albeit at LOWER BUT LONGER DOSAGES.

This is another good one!

More of her schtick. This gal will get you to question the “harmless” narrative, just like vaccines, but try to keep some common sense. Remember – driving is a killer, too. You still want the freedom to drive?

Common sense! How do we get the BEST of both worlds?

Now I’m just going to play a bunch of their infographics. Caveat emptor! But some of this stuff is interesting and counter-intuitive. SIGNAL and NOISE matter. In more ways than one.

SO – maybe you should THINK about how to handle the devices you have!!!

But then talk back to all that stuff HERE.

Be sure to be SKEPTICAL of this SKEPTIC lady – that is an essential part of ETHICAL SKEPTICISM. We don’t want to be panicky about 5G, or believing disinformation, but we do want to treat MICROWAVES as maybe not that awesome for our health, in doses that exceed our individual sensitivity.

So BEWARE of BROAD-BRUSH SKEPTICS who downplay too much in favor of technology.

After all, we just got through a BATTLE ROYALE over disastrous mRNA technology that was advanced too fast for all the wrong reasons.

LINK: https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/electromagnetic-fields-and-parental-panics/

Finally, a GREAT infographic. It’s MASSIVE. I’m only showing you the small version – you have to click the link for the BIG ONE that’s easy to read down to the details.

MASSIVE EMR Infographic (Thumbnail)

MASSIVE EMR Infographic (Full Version)

LINK: http://www.50northspatial.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/EMR_Welch.png

So that’s it. Let’s start investigating 5G, Havana syndrome, spy devices, and microwave crowd control devices, with some intelligent skepticism.

And may be even start thinking about HEADBAND technology.

Google Is Now Anti-Science

Something stinks, and to my nose, it’s the New World Odor.

But first, a disclaimer.

I’m actually ashamed that I wanted to work for Google at one point, but I need to get that out into the open right away, lest somebody, someday, use that “gotcha” against me and think it’s actually damaging.

Heck – I even bought a variety of Google swag, back when they were small and upstarty, just like when Netscape, Firefox, various Linux brands, and other rising tech companies were once “new” and “cool”.

A lot of people once thought that Google’s motto of “Don’t be evil” was a bit of a bass-ackwards under-performer, which should have been a positive, rather than a double-negative. Not me. I realized back then that this paradoxical formulation was exactly why the motto was so ahead of the curve.

“Being good” lacks skepticism – particularly of self. “Being good” as a primary motivator is a guaranteed set-up for the primary sin of PRIDE.

“Not being evil”, in contrast, is automagically skeptical of self. And skepticism isn’t just good for science – it’s good for religion.

Yes – I think it’s clear you need both. This is part of why (IMO) Christianity always refreshes itself by going back to its Jewish roots when there are foundational questions. No matter how you slice it, we need to concern ourselves with the Law, which includes consequential negatives, because we don’t want to get rid of our saving prohibitions.

We need our Peters, but we also need our Pauls.

Thus, when Google ditched “don’t be evil”, I smelled trouble.

And what is happening now, may be evidence that Google has forgotten how to “not be evil”.

Google has made mistake after mistake since they began tampering politically with their search engine, largely during the Obama years, but to an even greater degree during the Trump years. And now, in one short year of Biden – Google has arrived at the point of adopting a policy that conflicts with the most basic principles of science.

Simone Gold, of America’s Frontline Doctors, just tweeted this.

WOW: @Google sent notice stating they will be removing the America’s Frontline Doctors website from search results.

We are a team of medical doctors who dared to speak the truth.

And we have been proven right, again and again, and again. pic.twitter.com/ayRwGNXgLQ
— Dr. Simone Gold (@drsimonegold) February 26, 2022

“Nor do we allow content from any site that contradicts or runs contrary to scientific or medical consensus and evidence-based best practices.”

Well THAT’S great. How do you think science is going to advance? YOU CHUMPS!

Let’s just save that tweet, simply to make sure that it doesn’t disappear when Twitter inevitably suspends Dr. Gold.

Note these final words from Dr. Gold.

“And we have been proven right, again and again, and again.“
Dr. Simone Gold, AFLD

Dr. Gold is not lying. Throughout COVID-19, free and independent doctors and scientists have been LEADING captive science and captive medicine against their BIASED FUNDERS AND CONTROLLERS – which clearly include GOOGLE now.

The “concensus” science has repeatedly and continuously been ABNORMALLY WRONG due to BIAS, and has required continuous correction by – very sadly – OUTSIDERS.

Science does not progress by sticking to consensus. It advances by CHALLENGE TO CONSENSUS. Google is INTERFERING with that process. SHAME!!!

In my opinion, “they” are all scared.

And the reason they’re scared it this.

Now – as insurance companies look around to see who picks up the tab for people dying from the ERRORS OF THE CONSENSUS, it sure ain’t gonna be able to pin it on the people who WARNED about the experimental vaccines.

It may indeed be that some of the blame (moral, even if not monetary) will land on those who CENSORED THE SAVING WARNINGS.

Over and over, people like Google censored us because they said that the things WE SAID were not true, and yet it turned out that the things we said WERE true, and that the consensus THEY said was true, was both WRONG and responsible for MANY DEATHS.

And THIS may be the biggest CENSORED TRUTH of all.

mRNA Vaccines Really Do Change Your DNA

You will notice that this tweet no longer exists.

https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1497284602540351491

It was up for a day, and then it disappeared. I was lucky we had copies up in WordPress.

Here is a “tweetstamp”, that proves that it really did exist.

https://tweetstamp.org/1497284602540351491

Here is the text, where Twitter can’t touch it.

Alden et al, Lund University, Sweden, confirms one of our worst fears. The exogenous genetic material coding for the dangerous Spike protein is reverse-transcribed into the human genome; possible long-term constitutive expression/synthesis of disease promoting/lethal Spike. pic.twitter.com/JEzSwSruWM— Peter McCullough, MD MPH (@P_McCulloughMD) February 25, 2022

Here, I saved an image of a copy which was only partially destroyed by Twitter.

And here I saved the actual tweet (in two pieces).

Here is that image within the tweet, in more detail.

So what is McCullough talking about? And what is Twitter hiding?

THIS SCIENTIFIC PAPER.

LINK: https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/TIfnZ

Open Access Article

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

by Markus Aldén¹ ,
Francisko Olofsson Falla¹,
Daowei Yang¹,
Mohammad Barghouth¹,
Cheng Luan¹,
Magnus Rasmussen² and
Yang De Marinis^1,*
¹Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 20502 Malmö, Sweden
²Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden
^*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Academic Editor: Stephen Malnick
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(3), 1115-1126; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073 (registering DOI)
Received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 19 February 2022 / Accepted: 23 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Clinical, Translational and Basic Research on Liver Diseases)

Abstract

Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase. Immunohistochemistry using antibody binding to LINE-1 open reading frame-1 RNA-binding protein (ORFp1) on Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 indicated increased nucleus distribution of LINE-1. PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.

Keywords: COVID-19 mRNA vaccine; BNT162b2; liver; reverse transcription; LINE-1; Huh7

I am going to call this the De Marinis paper, after the lead author, Yang De Marinis, to whom correspondence is to be addressed.

I do this in analogy to a very important COVID-19 paper I refer to as the Jaenisch paper, which bears heavily on this more recent work.

LINK: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1.full

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/XWC52

I have discussed the Jaenisch paper numerous times since I became aware of it in December of 2020, and more importantly in March of 2021.

In fact, in the following blog post I made in April of 2021, I actually hypothesized a scenario which is basically the findings of the De Marinis paper!!!

Wolf’s Red-Hot Date With Retrotranscriptive Faucipox

Alternate Title: Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective? Gloating Pre-Preface There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought. Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY …

Now – let me state, in the simplest possible way, what these papers mean.

The Jaenish paper proves that the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus alters human DNA.

The De Marinis paper proves that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine also alters human DNA.

Oh, there are quibbles that I’m “oversimplifying”, but they’re just quibbles, and I will show you WHY they are not just quibbles, but extremely disingenuous ones.

And please note that I am UNDERSTATING when I just say “alters DNA”. The Jaenish paper proves that the viral DNA changes are going into GENOMIC DNA. The De Marinis paper strongly suggests that THE SAME may be happening due to the vaccine.

But before I give you MY take on the De Marinis paper, let me give you the opinions of OTHERS.

Let’s review one first.

Peter McCullough:

Translation: The pseudo-mRNA code for the spike protein in the Pfizer vaccine gets into the genomic DNA inside human cells in test tube experiments, and produces both DNA and mRNA coding for what was uniquely in the vaccine. This new cellular DNA and RNA very likely (as a consequence) produces spike protein, causing long-term disease and health issues.

One can legitimately contest the assertion that genomic DNA is being altered (we don’t know this yet – hopefully soon), but any denial of the fact that CELLULAR DNA is being changed, is simply not “fact-based”.

For example, I saw “downplay trolls” on the original McCullough tweet, quibbling about in vivo vs. in vitro – that these results don’t “prove” that the same thing happens in living humans – only in living human cells in a test tube.

The reason this is a hypocritical crock of shit, is that “due to an abundance of caution”, almost every single “carcinogen” and other “bad boy chemical” that is restricted or controlled in the United States, at the cost of trillions of dollars which go into the pockets of the deep state and China, is because of IN VITRO results.

Thus, if it’s OK to have vaccines that do what Pfizer’s vaccine does, then it’s OK to remove the restrictions on benzene, and have benzene everywhere. Likewise for thousands of other chemicals.

Starting to see how this works? Let’s move on.

Alex Berenson:

Hey, remember how they told you the mRNA in the vaccines could NEVER wind up in human DNA? A new study out of Sweden suggests otherwise (at least in lab-grown cells).

Don’t worry, everything is fine.

After all, we have all that long-term placebo-controlled clinical trial data proving the safety of these mRNA shots.*

All that careful preclinical work too.**

*No we don’t.

**Not that either.

Karl Denninger:

LINK: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=245270

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/RpDoE

So About Not Needing Actual Study…[Comments enabled]

Oh, mRNA won’t get taken up into cell lines and thus can’t propagate on a permanent basis in the human body, we were told.

Indeed that’s rather important. Mutagenic (cancer), cytotoxic (you’re ****ed) and teratogenic (any child you give birth to or sire is ****ed) things that get into cellular DNA can lead to irreversible damage because most cells in the body are replaced on regular basis.

There’s an infamous quote that is in fact wrong: Our body fully replaces itself every seven years. That’s not true. It came out of a study that looked at the average age of cells in a human, using Carbon-14 dating. Anyone who has done any sort of statistical work knows the problem with averages: They are just that, and the statistical outliers are there but unaccounted for with such simplistic tripe.

There are several types of cells that are never replaced. Certain ones in the cerebellum, for example, that deal with coordination and balance, those in the ocular lenses and the eggs in a woman’s ovaries.

There are also cells that are much more-frequently replaced. Red blood cells, for example, have a roughly 90 day life cycle. This is why an A1c test, which measures glycated hemoglobin (that is, red cells that have been damaged by glucose) will tell you what your average blood glucose level has been over the last three months. The epithelial cells in your intestines last only about five days, and the live (dermal) part of your skin is replaced in about 2 weeks. Skeletal muscle and the rest of your intestines, on the other hand, are good for around 15 years.

But with few exceptions it is indeed true that most cells are in fact replaced. This is why you can get cancer; when there is an error in that replication the result can be a cell that has wildly damaged regulatory mechanisms on self-replication. If that damage kills the cell immediately then there’s no real foul, but if it leads to much more rapid reproduction…… that’s cancer.

We have known for quite a while that viruses can and do in some cases infiltrate into DNA. We know this because we’ve found pieces of viral RNA in our genome and not a few of them either; they’re literally all over the human genomic code. It’s wildly improbable that said congruence happened by random alignment of the various codons in our genetic code; ergo, it got in there at some point in evolution and then got into either the eggs of a developing female fetus or the sperm of a male and thus propagated. We only know, of course, about the integrations that weren’t fatal to offspring or the person in question. We also know that in general genetic mutation is harmful or fatal nearly all the time, so that we have said evidence in our genome means this sort of thing happens quite frequently and most of the time it screws the person who has it happen to them.

Indeed some cancers are blamed on viral infections where the viral RNA gets transcribed into the DNA of the cells and causes said errors.

mRNA is not really “new” technology; Moderna has been trying to make it work for cancer, for example, for a long time — without success. The reason for failure has always been dose-related toxicity that has overtaken the benefit when used in sufficient quantity to actually deliver a therapeutic effect. This is not an uncommon reason for drug and therapy failure; in fact that too happens all the time.

But we didn’t bother doing intermediate and longer-term study on the specifics of using mRNA (or, for that matter, a modified virus as with J&J) to deliver a partial viral payload in this regard before rolling it out. Instead, we just trusted that there’d be no integration. Indeed zero epigenic, mutagenic and teratogenic studies were done;they take years to do and we just flat-out didn’t bother. Where we had original control groups in the summer and fall of 2020 we intentionally destroyed them by giving the placebo arm of the original trials the drug three months later, making analysis on any sort of clean analytical basis impossible.

This was wild arrogance given that we know viruses do indeed integrate via infection. To presume it won’t happen here, when we cause cells to produce viral proteins, when the very same thing, producing viruses when a cell is infected, sometimes does is ridiculously and wildly-irresponsible arrogance.

Unfortunately now we’re finding out that said arrogance may well screw you and if it has there’s nothing you can do about it — and worse, could screw your offspring.

In the BNT162b2 toxicity report, no genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies have been provided [26]. Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects. At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome.

This study does not prove that said genetic pollution has occurred, but it raises the distinct possibility as the precursor events required for this to occur are now known to happen with scientific certainty.

We don’t know because we deliberately did not look; the studies were not done prior to use.

MORE: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=245270

I think I’ve given you enough to chew on for now.

The bottom line is this:

The Jaenisch paper was concerning smoke.

The De Marinis paper is a four-alarm FIRE.

Please warn everybody who is even THINKING about giving an mRNA vaccine to kids.

SET THESE VACCINES ASIDE until we know more. Even spike protein vaccines are too risky, IMO. Set them all aside.

And NEVER, EVER, EVER AGAIN, mandate another vaccine. This was our wake-up call.

Soon, we will talk about the BIG PICTURE of what is going on here.

Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

genome

noun

In the fields of molecular biology and genetics, a genome is all genetic information of an organism.^[1] It consists of nucleotide sequences of DNA (or RNA in RNA viruses). The genome includes both the genes (the coding regions) and the noncoding DNA,^[2] as well as mitochondrial DNA^[3] and chloroplast DNA. The study of the genome is called genomics. The genomes of several organisms have been sequenced and genes analyzed. The human genome project which sequenced the entire genome for Homo sapiens was successfully completed in April 2003.

genomic DNA

Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (abbreviated as gDNA^[1]) is chromosomal DNA, in contrast to extra-chromosomal DNAs like plasmids. Most organisms have the same genomic DNA in every cell; however, only certain genes are active in each cell to allow for cell function and differentiation within the body.^[2]

The genome of an organism (encoded by the genomic DNA) is the (biological) information of heredity which is passed from one generation of organism to the next. That genome is transcribed to produce various RNAs, which are necessary for the function of the organism. Precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) is transcribed by RNA polymerase II in the nucleus. pre-mRNA is then processed by splicing to remove introns, leaving the exons in the mature messenger RNA (mRNA). Additional processing includes the addition of a 5′ cap and a poly(A) tail to the pre-mRNA. The mature mRNA may then be transported to the cytosol and translated by the ribosome into a protein. Other types of RNA include ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and transfer RNA (tRNA). These types are transcribed by RNA polymerase II and RNA polymerase III, respectively, and are essential for protein synthesis. However 5s rRNA is the only rRNA which is transcribed by RNA Polymerase III.^[3]

Used in a sentence:

While we tend to be more concerned about changes to genomic DNA, changes to any kind of human DNA are potentially problematic.

Used in a picture:

Used in a video:

OK – I think that’s enough geekiness for now.

That’s all, folks!

ENJOY THE SHOW

Have another great week!

W

DEAR KAG: 20220211 – The Pub is OPEN / G-Bay (Gab Marketplace) Is Here / Fake Science Normalized by Fake News and Fake Entertainment / Malone and Bhakdi Validated by “Pro-Vax” Paper

The Pub is STILL OPEN!

We are doing our best under the circumstances!

While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.

Christmas Spirit

We still have lights up all over the area. LOL!

Hey – how about we just keep believing?

And now, the rules of the pub.

HOUSE RULES

God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.

Now, back to business.

AMEN!

Free the January Brothers

(no matter what the SHANGHAI SLIDER says)

Current Art On The Wall

We ordered a crate of ivermectin from Mexico, and instead got a box of counterfeit paintings marked “L.A.”.

We’re selling the paintings to make enough back for a new order of ivermectin.

Colorful!

Leonid Afremov

LINK: https://thegallerist.art/leonid-afremov-2/

Hey! Maybe we can sell them on G-bay!

G-Bay (Gab Marketplace) Is Here

As a Gab Pro member, I just got an email about the opening of the Gab Marketplace, which is now best described as a rudimentary “Gbay” precursor, using Gab Chat (the integrated version, not the end-to-end encrypted one) as the negotiating mechanism.

Here are some exemplary screenshots. Click on them to enlarge.

The landing page…..

Electronics…..

Beauty…..

There are no bells and whistles now, but the goal is to soon integrate GabPay, their PayPal substitute that has been under development for some time now.

Here is the text of the email.

Introducing the Gab Marketplace, a giant leap forward for the Parallel Economy on Gab!
GabPRO members can create listings for a variety of categories including books, electronics, tools, home goods, and more.
Anyone can view Gab Marketplace listings, ask about its availability, and chat with sellers to buy their items.
The Gab Marketplace can also be explored without having a Gab account and listings can be shared anywhere.
Gab does not handle transactions for Marketplace listings yet, but we will be integrating GabPay, our Paypal alternative, once it is live.
Sellers and buyers must converse amongst themselves regarding purchasing listings.
We have many different categories and listings are filling up quickly, be sure to check back often to see new listings added.
We’ve also created a Job Board and Classifieds section in the Gab Marketplace.
Sell those electronics you haven’t used in forever, sell that Christmas gift you never opened, or anything in-between!
Upgrade to GabPRO to start posting Marketplace listings.
There are no additional listing fees and you can create up to 15 listings per day.
Join the Parallel Economy
Advertise Your Business on Gab
Reach 20 million+ people who share your values

It’s not that full of items yet, but there is some intriguing stuff already.

Check it out!!!

Fake Science Normalized by Fake News and Fake Entertainment

Thanks to Sadie for showing me these truly egregious, horror-show examples of the absolute worst of FAKE SCIENCE.

ICYMI, it’s not the pokes, it’s CLOCKS! pic.twitter.com/46qwwaDgkY
— Dr. Lynn Fynn (Fan Account) (@fynn_fan) February 7, 2022

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR!

Or could it be your electric bill? pic.twitter.com/AHxSTQcaFM
— Dr. Lynn Fynn (Fan Account) (@fynn_fan) February 7, 2022

We have seen some of these already, alleging things like “pandemic stress” being responsible for clot-shot cardiac consequences. Those were bad, but now it’s just becoming ludicrous.

It’s very clear to me that the “Fake News” has been tasked with trying to GET PEOPLE TO INNOCENTLY RATIONALIZE the downstream effects of the FAILED plandemic and clot shot plot, whatever those might eventually be proven to have involved.

Trump really tried to get people to see the MEDIA ROLE in regard to “climate change” – that CLIMATE ALARMISM was basically a SIMULTANEOUS media hoax on both scientists and non-scientists.

As long as the media will defend the LIE that science itself, individual scientists, and scientists as a group, are ALL in full, 100% control of what they themselves think, then the TRUTH that the media controls what science thinks and says can be hidden from the public.

It is only NOW – at a moment when many scientists are WAKING UP to what the media has done TO THEM, and are actively TURNING IT OFF, that they realize the media was LEADING THEM.

Let me state this clearly.

FAKE SCIENCE – controlled by the media – is one of the greatest dangers to humanity EVER.

FAKE NEWS is used to lead Fake Science – to hint subconsciously to science and scientists where it’s “going”.

FAKE ENTERTAINMENT is used to normalize Fake Science – to raise the barriers to questioning it.

IT IS YOUR DUTY TO PERCEIVE AND REJECT FAKE SCIENCE.

Being moderately scientifically literate is now a SURVIVAL SKILL, just like being politically literate, or even being just plain literate.

We will continue to bash fake science here, and I personally will continue to appreciate all examples of it that you may find and bring here, because dissecting and analyzing fake science is one of the best ways to fight it.

REAL SCIENCE is making a comeback, and YOU, DEAR AND PATRIOTIC CITIZEN, are part of that GREAT AWAKENING.

Malone and Bhakdi Validated by “Pro-Vax” Paper

On Monday, I covered a recent paper coauthored by Dr. Peter McCullough, which hypothesizes that documented failure of the mRNA vaccines to activate the interferon system, in combination with documented migration of both vaccine-induced spike protein and specific interferon-suppressing microRNAs via exosomes, is behind a variety of health problems associated with the current COVID vaccines.

Dear KMAG: 20220207 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Pandemic of the Vaccine – Are mRNA Vaccines Fundamentally Flawed?

The hypothesis of this paper is based on rough but obvious signals from VAERS, existing mRNA vaccine data in the literature (interferons and related species, microRNAs, exosomes), and known mechanisms which would explain the VAERS signals if connected to the vaccine data.

I was only partway through that paper, when I was saying to myself “Good grief – why are we even USING these vaccines, much less mandating them?”

Now, as a kind of second strike, Malone has found a paper which not only confirms his suspicions and fears of mRNA vaccine problems, but which also perfectly confirms Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi’s contention that the mRNA vaccines are producing too much of the WRONG antibody type and none of the two more desirable types.

. @JikkyKjj
Look what Malone dug up. This is basically what #Bhakdi postulated, but worse. Much worse.https://t.co/35BjSecPRD
— Straker (@EnjoyTheDecline) February 8, 2022

You can go directly to Malone’s Substack post here:

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/a-health-public-policy-nightmare

Let me cite the beginning of this post – up to where Malone poses the big question.

A Health Public Policy Nightmare

Vaccine spike antigen and mRNA persist for two months in lymph node germinal centers… protein production of spike is higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients!

Robert W Malone MD, MS

Feb 8

1,119 243

Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination

Cell. Published: January 24, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.018

Highlights (per the journal)

Vaccination confers broader IgG binding of variant RBDs than SARS-CoV-2 infection
Imprinting from initial antigen exposures alters IgG responses to viral variants
Histology of mRNA vaccinee lymph nodes shows abundant germinal centers
Vaccine spike antigen and mRNA persist for weeks in lymph node germinal centers

The hidden highlight (lede) buried in this peer reviewed paper is that protein production of spike in people vaccinated with the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine is higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients! A person might ask, “How could that be?” In order to understand this, we must carefully analyze what the study shows.

I urge you to finish reading Malone’s post about this paper.

LINK: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/a-health-public-policy-nightmare

I ALSO urge you to read the paper itself (PDF is public), which looks at the same data, and cheer-leads vaccines, stating but otherwise ignoring EVERYTHING that Malone and Bhakdi are concerned about. Ignore the parts you can’t read – there’s plenty that you CAN read, and it is very instructive.

I will attempt to explain the difference between the two views of the same results, but let me give you the Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF).

The original paper was researched and written while the participants were fully under “Gates Vaccine Mind Control” and “Fauci Antibody Hypnosis”, both of which cause scientists to rather blindly follow the laser-pointers which control their outlook on vaccine science.

Gates: Vaccines are the only legitimate way to fight viral disease.

Fauci: Antibodies which I designate determine if a vaccine is safe and effective.

These are the lies of SMART SCIENCE LIARS, because they’re difficult to prove untrue in a way that normies can understand.

As Robert Malone notes, one of the most important facts in the paper [that the vaccines produce more spike protein than even severe cases of COVID-19] is a “buried lede”, although I would go further and state that it was never buried, because it’s not even a concern to the authors.

Once one accepts a priori that:

vaccines are good
vaccine side effects are obvious, immediate, and allergic in nature
spike makes antibodies, and antibodies are good
concerns about the spike protein are misinformation

…..then it is pretty much impossible for these COVID vaccines to do any wrong.

Just ask a scientist, who believes all these things BECAUSE OF THE MEDIA.

More spike protein means more antibodies, and more antibodies is good – RIIIIIGHT?

And if there are problems, it’s the vaccine working! Just ask Jabcinda Ardour!

ANTIBODY HYPNOSIS WILL DO THAT. Under antibody hypnosis, anything which contributes to antibodies which Fauci highlights, is “good” – all other antibodies or other responses are either bad or irrelevant.

The authors of the paper make sure to say all sorts of good things about vaccines, and never say anything critical, despite the fact that they’re sitting on all kinds of evidence that something is very wrong with these mRNA vaccines.

Example:

The appearance of virus variants, waning antibody levels after infection or vaccination (Falsey et al., 2021; Levin et al., 2021), and breakthrough infections in previously immunized individuals (Keehner et al., 2021) indicate that periodic vaccine boosting of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is warranted.

REALLY? Some of us scientists believe the exact opposite – that these diverse FAILURES indicate that a vaccination strategy is dubious if not highly UNWARRANTED – but OUR view is called “misinformation”.

Seriously – it’s like hypnosis. The authors of the paper CANNOT SEE the things that Malone points out, or that Bhakdi pointed out.

Likewise, the problems which WE can see were clearly NOT found in “peer review”, precisely because the PEERS are for the most part just as much under vaccine hypnosis and antibody hypnosis as the authors, so real and deep questions about the jabs are simply never going to get asked. And if any peers DO recognize the problems, they will keep their mouths shut, or “test the waters” gently, to see if any concerns are allowed.

Those who CAN see the problems, know enough to keep their mouths shut, if they want to remain players in the Science Game.

I go back to what I said earlier about the media – including the science media – including journals – literally CONTROLLING what scientists think – and that scientists have no clue. Sad.

Anyway, now that I’ve provided background of what is going on here – a “pro-vax” paper in which Malone finds shocker evidence of problems, let’s discuss the specifics that Malone found, and that Bhakdi also predicted.

One of the first things that Malone catches is the persistence of both the mRNA and the spike protein in lymph node germinal centers – lasting for WEEKS instead of a few days. Note that this perfectly matches a clinical case that we featured here on these pages!

Interview With A Victim of Jab-Haul COVID

I have here an absolutely fascinating video (end of article) from Gab TV that fits right into everything I know about COVID-19 and the spike protein vaccines, like the last piece of a puzzle. The video is just under 1/2 hour in length, but it is FILLED with little AHA moments. An extremely articulate, healthy, …

Basically, this woman (on the left) got “long haul COVID” symptoms from a JAB – including massively swollen lymph nodes that lasted for WEEKS. That led to a lot of permanent damage. What she experienced is now explained PERFECTLY by what Dr. Malone postulates.

AND I NOTE THIS AS WELL. What Dr. Malone postulates (below), is exactly what The Ethical Skeptic noted as a CONCERN on Twitter in 2020, before the vaccines ever arrived! Yes, I have not gone looking for his tweet, but TES specifically noted that these vaccines are not “actual” mRNA vaccines – they are PSEUDO-mRNA vaccines.

WHUUUUUUUUT?????!!!!!

Yes. To evade immune protection from foreign mRNA, the vaccine mRNA uses a “pseudo” base to trick the human immune system into thinking it’s not mRNA, even though it works the same way. It’s something of a beautiful hack, but it’s a hack.

Malone:

One very real hypothesis is that the substitution of pseudouridine for uridine to avoid the immune response is working so well that the mRNA is completely evading the normal clearance/degradation pathways. Hence, mRNA that is not being incorporated into cells at the injection site, is migrating to the lymph nodes (and throughout the body as the non-clinical Pfizer data suggest?) and continuing to express protein there. In this case, the cytotoxic protein antigen is spike. Spike protein can be detected for at least 60 days after administration of dose. Note that the duration of the protein expression was only tested for 60 days.

But it gets worse. After reminding us of the pathogenicity of the spike protein (merely citing others), Malone reminds us that the use of pseudouridine to evade immune cleanup is not actually necessary in mRNA vaccines – but it IS (and this is rather horrible) PATENTABLE as an “improvement”.

Again, Malone.

To note: The use of pseudouridine in these mRNA vaccines is not the only option. It has often been hypothesized that the reason Dr. Kariko added pseudouridine to the mRNA vaccine was to make an improvement to the original mRNA patents that I was an inventor on. An improvement to an existing patent allows commercialization of that patent. It is an old trick. Remember, that Curevac does not use pseudouridine in its formulation and it is not required or necessary for a significant immune response. In the next generation of mRNA vaccine experiments (hopefully done in an animal model), it is clear that the issues of adding pseudouridine need to be addressed prior to any more of these vaccines going into humans.

So how much spike protein does this stuff produce? Again, Malone.

Knowing what we know about the spike protein in these vaccines, the study quantitatively measured spike protein levels in plasma after vaccination. Which, it turns out, are higher than the levels observed in a person with a severe COVID-19 infection. Just to write it, the fact that this only now being discovered or it it was known, released to the public is criminal in my opinion. This should have been characterized long ago, including prior to beginning human clinical trials.
That this has not been published or investigated more demonstrates the gross regulatory dereliction of duty by Pfizer, Biointech, Moderna, NIAID VRC and that whole crew. Using these vaccines, which include pseudouridine without fully understanding the implications and without the FDA requiring a complete pre-clinical toxicology regulatory package, including long-term follow-up, as is done with any other unique chemical or adjuvant additive is shocking. Then there is the novel use of the unique nano particles being used in these vaccines, which also were only marginally assessed, as shown by the Japanese Pfizer data.
Protein expression is not being turned off, because the immune response against the mRNA/pseudouridine complex is either not happening or is ineffective. It may also be that the mRNA/pseudouridine complex has a longer half-life than normal mRNA. The In either case, this is regulatory nightmare.
I do not know how to write this more strongly. This technology is immature. The WHO has approved six, more traditional vaccines, all of which the US government could license. These genetic vaccines are not the only option.

And just to make sure you get it, Malone quotes the relevant parts of the paper, and says it again.

Read that again: Protein production of spike is higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients!

As an understated closer, without mentioning him by name, Malone adds how THIS paper confirms a concern that Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi had about THE WRONG ANTIBODY TYPES being produced by the vaccines.

The paper also notes that the antibody response is IgG, not IgA or IgM. IgA and IgM antibodies produce a strong mucosal immune response needed for respiratory diseases, unlike IgG.

Finally, Malone makes this statement.

This Substack article has only skimmed the surface of the implications of this paper in terms of both the science and the malfeasance on the part of our government and pharmaceutical corporations. There is more to come on this issue.

You will note that, by implication, the AUTHORS of this paper clearly said nothing indicative of malfeasance. Now it may be entirely possible that they were “getting out truth” while keeping their heads out from under any funding guillotines, but they clearly evidenced no overt concerns for any problems.

And THAT is how FAKE SCIENCE works, my friends.

Lastly, let me add one of my own “concerns”.

Allow me to repeat the authors’ own highlights of the paper, for commentary.

Vaccination confers broader IgG binding of variant RBDs than SARS-CoV-2 infection
Imprinting from initial antigen exposures alters IgG responses to viral variants
Histology of mRNA vaccinee lymph nodes shows abundant germinal centers
Vaccine spike antigen and mRNA persist for weeks in lymph node germinal centers

To these FOUR items, I have FOUR responses, all of which I know Karl Denninger will get.

Leaving aside IgG being the wrong antibodies (see above), BINDING antibodies can still, also, be “wrong” (or more accurately “inappropriate”) antibodies, depending on what happens next, including enhanced variants and ADE. NEUTRALIZING antibodies are the “most appropriate” kind. BINDING antibodies may or may not help. So DO NOT take this point as an automatic score for the vaccines. In my humble opinion, NATURE is likely smarter than Pfizer and Rochelle Alinsky on what to do here.
Original antigen sin. They’re calling it. “Imprinting.” It means that every exposure to an antigen can potentially MISLEAD the immune system for the purposes of the next exposure. Great. SO – how confident are you folks that these vaccines are giving a superior “imprinting” to natural infection? I am NOT confident, and in fact, I believe that the “pseudouridine error” is proof that NIH, Pfizer, Moderna, CDC, CEPI, and all the rest are not even remotely competent to choose the best “imprinting” for children. They are choosing the one that gives themselves the most power, control, and money. SHAME!
The vaccines are going to the lymph nodes. Well, well, well. Not only does this destroy the establishment TROLL talking point about vaccine localization in the deltoid muscle – it provides a nice explanation of the exosome-based spread of the spike protein and interferon-suppressing microRNAs.
Persistence of vaccine and thus-produced spike in the lymph nodes lasts for weeks. Add to this the liberation of spike protein in LIPID-BASED EXOSOMES into the bloodstream. What’s that going to do? Why, it’s going to SPREAD SPIKE IN LIPIDS to other places where lipids collect. Which means spike ends up in other organs. Which can potentially include organs (like skin and other glands) which SHED LIPIDS. Which includes breast milk (dead infants in VAERS) and skin oils (see prior posts on this blog, where my incredulity about “shedding” was overcome). AND don’t forget the ovaries. Etc.

So – that is where we are.

And where is Fake News on this? Totally absent.

We’re not only the news now.

We’re the science now.

ENJOY THE SHOW.

Thank you all for being here. Have a great weekend.

W

Dear KMAG: 20220207 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Pandemic of the Vaccine – Are mRNA Vaccines Fundamentally Flawed?

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

Get your rest, Trumpy Bear! You’re going back to the White House!!!

We need to restore sanity in the White House, and it’s time to get Winnie the Pooh OUT.

The Business At Hand

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But it doesn’t matter, because with God, every day is glorious!

And if you need that in a song…… ONE MORE TIME…..

The Rules

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.

The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

Thus we are assembled here to peacefully address our grievances to whom they may concern, even each other, using both our freedom of speech and of press, as well as our freedom of religion.

SO….. [ENGAGE BOILERPLATE…..]

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

That includes the life skill of just ignoring certain other posters.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump prays with pastors during a campaign visit to the International Church of Las Vegas and the International Christian Academy in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S., October 5, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Segar

MUSICAL INTERLUDE

For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.

YouTube is absolutely bombarding me with videos of that Japanese art-pop girl-band “Perfume” that I showed on Friday. The YouTube Wocommie Mensheviks must have some foul intention, so I think I’ll go looking for something else, but just ONE video is a good lead-in, so here you go.

Thankfully, YouTube isn’t just recommending girl groups to me, as long as I get OFF a girl group video page, in which case girl groups are THE ONLY THINGS they recommend.

On a “blank” YouTube page, I also get “epic music” now!

This is a nice one. Don’t mind the “furries” and assorted anime characters.

https://youtu.be/XrisCsNzOlo

This is a long one, too – you can come back for it while reading the features below.

Next, we have one of Wheatie’s favorite artists – Two Steps From Hell – celebrating our lady warriors!

Yes – beware those who would go after our kids…….

They might not be expecting WHO exactly it is, who will DELIVER THE MILLSTONES.

So let’s close out with a REAL girl group – complete with a fiddle!

Now THAT’S what I’m talkin’ about!

Call To Battle

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.

Pandemic of the Vaccine

Are mRNA Vaccines Fundamentally Flawed?

As promised in Friday’s post…..

DEAR KAG: 20220204 – … The End of the mRNA Vaccines …

…..I want to discuss a research paper that was brought to my attention by Gail Combs.

BUT FIRST, let me freshen you up with where things were as of February 3, when Robert Malone had THIS to say about the military data showing that the mandated mRNA jabs were definitively causing harm.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vtztbk-the-covid-vaccine-side-effects-are-worse-than-expected.html

That’s just a quick overview of the problem. Here’s the latest, and in more detail. H/T TradeBait2 for this one. This addresses the jaw-dropping and eye-rolling defense by NIH and their Pentagram buddies, which just dropped military credibility by another factor of two.

Is woke mil causing damage? COMMUNISM always causes damage!

LINK: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/regarding-the-defense-medical-epidemiological

As Malone points out in the latter article, in a beautifully understated way, the “defenders of the jab” are now offering excuses that strain credibility to the breaking point. It is very easy to see that the other side is committed to any deception, of other or of self, to keep the jab train rolling.

They are NOT willing to honestly look at the striking relative dangers of these BAD VACCINES.

Something is very wrong, we can plainly see, but let’s just play along and pretend that this whole ridiculous scenario still deserves debate.

We have plenty of observations at this point, but the “old theory of harmless jabs” is able to play “what about” and temporarily evade many if not most of those explanations, lacking an obviously more compelling theory of WHY THE JABS CAUSE HARM, which would make “whataboutisms” unpalatable, even to those who want to believe them.

Well, is there such a compelling theory?

We have advanced certain key principles which explain things, and those are important.

We know about the pathogenic spike protein.

We know about vaccine migration and persistence.

But something is different, now.

NOW we have a theory which includes both of those things, PLUS a principle of IMMUNOLOGICAL ERROR.

In my opinion, we’re there.

The title of this work is:

Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs

January 2022

DOI:10.22541/au.164276411.10570847/v1

Project: COVID 19

Authors:

Stephanie Seneff

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Greg Nigh

Immersion Health

Anthony Kyriakopoulos

Nasco AD Biotech Lab

Peter A Mccullough

(Could have said Baylor College of Medicine, but Baylor is historically inept, IMO)

LINK: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs

PDF: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stephanie-Seneff/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs/links/61f0b7838d338833e395e22f/Innate-Immune-Suppression-by-SARS-CoV-2-mRNA-Vaccinations-The-role-of-G-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-microRNAs.pdf

The Abstract

The abstract is instructive, and if you want to “TL;DR” past the rest of things, at least give that a read. Better yet, stick around for my interpretation of the abstract.

ABSTRACT

The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease had no precedent, but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures. The mRNA vaccines utilize genetically modified mRNA encoding spike proteins. These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses, promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins, and provoke higher overall spike protein production. However, both experimental and observational evidence reveals a very different immune response to the vaccines compared to the response to infection with SARS-CoV-2. As we will show, the genetic modifications introduced by the vaccine are likely the source of these differential responses. In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage. We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.

What I absolutely LOVE, LOVE, LOVE about this abstract, is that it takes some of the most key points of what the Fake News calls “conspiracy theories” and restates them in fact-bolstered scientific jargon that absolutely cannot be disputed. It’s just beautiful.

Because this abstract is important for understanding as we go into the paper, I’m going to take it “line by line” and explain, so that when we get to the paper itself, you can understand what is being talked about and get the gist of it, even if the scientific nuances are not entirely clear to you.

There are TWELVE sentences, each worthy of consideration.

HANG ON FOR A QUICK WARM-UP RIDE.

Analyzing the Abstract

(1) The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19.

“Widely perceived”.

This is an unarguable fact. It’s a great way to start the argument. State a truth without leaning on the “real crisis” narrative cheese in the center of the trap.

It does NOT say that the mRNA vaccines were brought to market unreasonably, which is open to debate, and which will be a contested question. Remember – many people (including me) HOPED that new technologies – which we were led to believe were needed – would free us from the virus.

Are you starting to see how they USED Trump? In my opinion, we still don’t understand the full extent of the deception and counter-deception. But none of that is said here – it is just ALLOWED under the statement of fact without narrative.

(2) The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease had no precedent, but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures.

“Seemed to”.

This is also factual, if we’re honest. The Jab Justifiers will quibble about veterinary vaccines, and experimental vaccines, and all that, as precedents, but those are quibbles. The truth is, you and I never got one of these genetic vaccines before, and that’s because they had never been approved before.

The beauty of this phrasing – “but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures” – is that it forces us to admit the context of the phony crisis created by the Fake News and Democrats, by only saying “seemed to call for” instead of “called for”.

What the authors are doing here is dropping out the “fake normal” created by the media.

And THAT is an ongoing lesson for science itself to return to control by science and TRUTH.

(3) The mRNA vaccines utilize genetically modified mRNA encoding spike proteins.

This is absolutely true, and absolutely key. The mRNA of the vaccines encodes a FULL “half” of a very particular version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. However, in order to accomplish several goals, the mRNA which WOULD code for that half of the spike protein is substantially altered in several different ways to make the whole process work.

And that leads to the next sentence.

(4) These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses, promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins, and provoke higher overall spike protein production.

There is a lot of nuance here, so I will take some time to explain the 3 items.

(a) These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses

There are multiple reasons that the “mRNA” of the vaccines is not actually normal mRNA, but a kind of “pseudo” mRNA.

Cells have to be careful not to “execute the instructions” of what is essentially WRONG RNA. Cells are a lot like soldiers who have been trained to NOT carry out unconstitutional orders.

The fact that mRNA vaccines and related forms of mRNA-based gene therapy actually work AROUND cellular defenses is a hint RIGHT THERE that they might do something bad. Our bodies are designed to FIGHT OFF foreign mRNA.

Be careful how you interpret what I’m saying there. It’s not an indictment of the mRNA method per se, because MANY if not ALL drugs have to “work around cellular and bodily defenses”. That is a huge part of the science of drug delivery.

HOWEVER, it is always cautionary to admit THAT one is working around defenses, because this will inform one as to the RISKS which are being taken BY working around those defenses.

What if you aren’t actually working around the risks?

So, one truth is that the mRNA has certain bases changed to avoid “tipping off” those defenses. It’s a SNEAKY and LUCKY break that we actually CAN work around those defenses.

But are we doing so CLEANLY and to good outcome?

(b) promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins

This is a HUGE double-edged sword.

Remember – the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein CHANGES SHAPE as it breaks into the cell. When it’s all done, it looks like a different protein – even to antibodies.

The drug designers have (literally, but synthetically) mutated the original reported Wuhan spike protein sequence. The primary reason to do this, is to make the protein “LOCK IN” the original, highly infectious, three-dimensional shape of the “fresh” protein, so that antibodies will form PROPERLY against that, instead of forming against depleted, spent, “used” spike protein. This reduces the chances of ADE (antibody-dependent disease enhancement), which comes from “inappropriate antibodies” that evolved to the WRONG TARGET.

The problem with stabilizing the highly pathogenic spike protein for triggering more desirable antibody formation, is that it also stabilizes the highly pathogenic spike protein for pathogenesis, too.

“WHOOPS!”

So – spike-protein-based “long haul” symptoms from the vaccine can be very long – even compared to long haul from the disease. The synthetic spike protein is really good at sticking around in its mutated, long-lasting, highly pathogenic form.

And THAT might not be a good thing.

Ask this question – why doesn’t the VIRUS do that? Maybe a more stable protein is not only bad for the virus, but also bad for the host, and THAT is in turn bad for the virus AGAIN.

Nature is smart – especially when it cuts a deal with multiple organisms to INCREASE LIFE.

This is a DIRECT call-out of a problem that will almost certainly lead to arguments with “peer reviewers” who want to defend the vaccines. Note that the wording very intentionally does not say “These alterations are intended to…..[three things]” – it simply says “These alterations….. [three things].”

The alterations are INTENDED to provoke higher overall spike protein antibody production. But the fact is, unless the increase in antibodies comes from better and stronger adjuvants, which act as immunity multipliers, then it’s coming from higher (or otherwise more antigenic and pathogenic) overall spike protein production.

Thus, peer reviewers who want to cover up spike protein malfeasance will likely insist on dragging the wording back to being about the antibodies. This follows the lead of Tony Fauci and his “antibody hypnosis” act, designed to keep attention OFF all of the things that are WRONG with the vaccines.

As you can see, we’re only 4 sentences in, and there is a lot of “battle prep” already going on.

(5) However, both experimental and observational evidence reveals a very different immune response to the vaccines compared to the response to infection with SARS-CoV-2.

This is a very general but very powerful FACTUAL statement, which DEFIES the Fauci / Fake News narrative – a narrative which can’t even bring itself to ADMIT that disease-conferred immunity is a reality.

This is a point about which – if you have read even SOME of the COVID-19 scientific literature – there is literally no debate. Only in the Fake News media and on controlled social media is this twisted. Scientists now marvel ALL THE TIME at the differences between vaccine-conferred immunity and disease-conferred immunity.

And, almost ALWAYS, practically speaking (but ignoring any risks of acquiring immunity), disease-conferred immunity is superior.

You will note that Fauci NEVER talks about this stuff.

But there is more – much more. ANY adverse effects which happen due to the vaccines and not the disease, or happen MORE with the vaccines, rightly count as differences.

The paper is not saying this out loud – but you can understand that it is implied.

This right here – the point about a difference between vaccine immunity and disease immunity – is the HAMMER of the gun going back and making a “clicking” noise.

(6) As we will show, the genetic modifications introduced by the vaccine are likely the source of these differential responses.

THIS HERE IS THE BIGGIE.

There are SO MANY potential implications here, I don’t want to steal their thunder from the analysis of the paper.

However, without knowing ANYTHING FURTHER, this is a profoundly common-sense scientific statement. It is simply saying that different molecules from the virus RNA may lead to different outcomes. That’s almost a no-brainer.

This could happen in multiple different ways.

differences in how the “changed mRNA” is handled by the body
differences in how it is interpreted
differences in the protein product

All of this makes wonderful sense.

(7) In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.

Oh, wait – THIS is the biggie.

This is saying that there is an important cellular communication screw-up with mRNA vaccination – a screw-up which does not occur with natural infection. Stated in reverse, there IS an important cellular communication channel opened during natural infection, which is MISSED by the mRNA vaccines.

IN OTHER WORDS, A PROGRAMMING ERROR.

This is all too believable to me, because I’ve seen this before. And NOT just when I “learned to code”.

This is LITERALLY a sibling programming error of what happens when too many vaccines are given at the same time, and interferon signals STEP ON EACH OTHER.

Now the Fake News media “fact checkers” absolutely will not admit that there is a problem with multiple simultaneous vaccines, but once the standard mechanism of vaccine-acquired immunity was explained to me, it became OBVIOUS AS HELL that signal interference was behind the observed but somewhat unpredictable problems with tight vaccine schedules.

You are allowed to have a different scientific opinion from these biased and forked-tongued “fact checkers” with agenda.

But let’s save the details for later.

For now, just remember that humans are evolutionarily adapted for disease, not hacky pseudo-mRNA vaccines. Our PROGRAMMING MODEL – our DESIGN – our API – is different from what the hackers thought they could get away with, and they got caught.

(8) We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites.

More specifics.

This is fascinating, because AND LOGIC is now telling me that it’s not just the vaccine migrating, but spike protein as well.

And THAT explains a LOT.

Do you see how everything is tying together nicely around the pathogenic spike protein that is NOT being degraded soon enough or fast enough, like the VIRUS DOES FOR US?

Think about our little human biome friends next time, science. They may have a BETTER PLAN.

(9) We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance.

OK, this is bad stuff. But it’s also bad stuff that is right up the alley of FAKE SCIENCE to now “discover” and get big bucks to study. It’s DETAILS that cannot be dismissed.

This is the GRENADE thrown into the narrative machine gun bunker with half a second left on the fuse.

KABOOM.

This is where every “me too!” funding whore is going to jump on the bandwagon with justification.

(10) These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage.

Oh, wait! Isn’t this the stuff that Robert Malone warned us about?

Isn’t this the stuff that Ryan Cole spotted?

Isn’t this the stuff that FAKE NEWS ignored and “debunked”, but is now appearing in every possible mainstream source of data?

Common sense is going to win here.

INVESTORS had better TAKE NOTE. The landscape is going to change, IMO.

(11) We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis.

The beauty of VAERS is that it’s flawed, but we know HOW it’s flawed.

Thus, if you see something that can only be MAGNIFIED by correcting for the known flaws, then you have something you can use.

Just stroll past those Fake News fact checkers and Fake Social Media “con-TROLLS” who spew their talking point about “VAERS IS A FLAWED SYSTEM”. SORRY. Not good enough, trolls.

Everything is a flawed system. Knowing the DIRECTION of the flaws is what turns all systems into useful logical tools.

We will use common sense here, long after these people who deny it are OUT OF POWER.

(12) We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.

This is where they land when all is said and done.

They’re saying that they believe the risks outweigh the benefits with THESE vaccines.

This does NOT say that vaccination per se is a bad strategy for COVID-19.

It says that mRNA vaccination as it currently exists is not a good strategy for COVID-19.

It doesn’t say that viral vector cDNA, “full” spike protein subunit antigen, or RBD subunit antigen vaccines are doubtful in any way. They may be, but the authors don’t say that (although some of the specifics DO have implications for the other vaccines).

The authors only say that THESE particular, current, mRNA vaccines are “not positive contributors to public health”.

And you can do the math from there.

Can the current mRNA vaccines be fixed?

Good question. This paper is likely a roadmap to any such fixes. But until then…..

Mandating these vaccines is WRONG, if not INSANE.

Analyzing the Paper

Now we get to the meat of the paper.

I am just going to drop my impressions, placing them in context as needed. On some of these, I blab on and on. On others, I just make a short point. I do a lot of quoting where the authors say it nicely. This is very seat-of-the-pants.

Introduction

The FIRST paragraph is a generous summary of the basics of vaccination, FULLY in compliance with the CDC definitions. Please take note of that. There is no quibbling about the mRNA vaccines not being vaccines.

The SECOND paragraph summarizes and exemplifies the presence in the literature of a viewpoint that the mRNA vaccines are very similar to natural immunity. There is a point made that is basically my contention of Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis”, but it is phrased very politiely.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) makes the case based upon antibody titers generated by prior infection vs. vaccination, in addition to production of memory B cells, to argue that the immune response to vaccination is analogous to the response to natural infection [4]. It is this similarity in the humoral immune response to vaccination vs natural infection, paired with both trial and observational data demonstrating reduced risk of infection following vaccination, that stands as the justiﬁcation for the mass vaccination campaign.

The THIRD paragraph is long, but absolutely key.

It is the summary of the guts of the paper.

You will note that the authors are pointing out EXISTING MAINSTREAM SCIENCE which is contradicting the media-trumpeted, but “CDC-silent” narrative that vaccination is superior to “natural immunity”, by pointing out (without saying it bluntly) that it’s not even AS GOOD as disease-conferred immunity, because known “good” responses to the natural antigen are completely missing.

And worse than that, the mRNA vaccines seem to do WRONG THINGS to the immune system as well.

In this paper we explore the scientiﬁc literature suggesting that vaccination with an mRNA vaccine initiates a set of biological events that are not only diﬀerent from that induced by vaccination but are in several ways demonstrably counterproductive to both short- and long-term immune competence and normal cellular function. These vaccinations have now been shown to downregulate critical pathways related to cancer surveillance, infection control, and cellular homeostasis. They introduce into the body highly modiﬁed genetic material. A medRxiv preprint has revealed a remarkable diﬀerence between the characteristics of the immune response to an infection with SARS-CoV-2 as compared with the immune response to an mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 [5]. Diﬀerential gene expression analysis of peripheral dendritic cells revealed a dramatic upregulation of both type I and type II interferons (IFNs) in COVID-19 patients, but not in vaccinees. One remarkable observation they made was that there was an expansion of circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in COVID-19 patients, but this expansion was notably absent following vaccination. A striking expansion in circulating plasmablasts observed in COVID-19 patients was also not seen in the vaccinees. All of these observations are consistent with the idea that the vaccines actively suppress type I IFN signaling, as we will discuss below. In this paper we will be focusing extensively, though not exclusively,on vaccination-induced type I IFN suppression and the myriad downstream eﬀects this has on the related signaling cascade.

Again, I point out that this is being pulled out of the “mainstream” literature.

Does this immune suppression that researchers found remind you of anything?

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/NmhFesU2aPue/

Note that this is on BitChute because YouTube deleted it as “misinformation”.

If you’re thinking “Wow, the media and social media has really screwed up science!”, well, all I can say is “They won’t be able to walk the streets.”

The FOURTH paragraph then begins dropping bombs on the Pfizer clinical trial shenanigans, which basically covered up the placebo group to obfuscate vaccine problems.

The message is roughly “Because Pfizer covered things up by vaccinating their placebo group, as well as other tricks, we were forced to look at VAERS and the scientific literature to find out what the vaccines are doing – AND BOY, DID WE FIND A TON OF PROBLEMS.”

But done much more politely.

The next two paragraphs are a WITHERING ATTACK on the vaccines, simply using the scientific literature. OMG – the spatter on the walls – there are quite a few easy targets that the Fake News Media has been protecting by ignoring, but it’s very hard to “memory hole” the scientific literature to those who can “pay to play”, so the authors just mention a string of scientific findings that Fauci hoped the public would never see.

Thus, the FIFTH paragraph is a summary of VACCINE FAILURE, with references.

The SIXTH paragraph then brings up the wonderful idea that if benefits are as low as we now understand them to be, maybe RISKS need a closer look.

You may want to read the whole introduction, because that is the last easily readable section of the paper for a while.

NOW it gets really technical.

Interferons: An Overview with Attention to Cancer Surveillance

This section is extremely complex and hard to read, even if you’re familiar with most or all of the various biochemical and biological acronyms that are thrown into the melange.

It starts off with a review of what is known about INTERFERONS (IFNs), as well as substances which regulate them, known as INTERFERON REGULATING FACTORS (IRFs).

This is what you need to know:

Type I IFNs play a powerful role in the immune response to multiple stressors. In fact, they have enjoyed clinical therapeutic value as a treatment option for a variety of diseases and conditions, including viral infections, solid tumors, myeloproliferative disorders, hematopoietic neoplasms and autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis [16].
As a group, IFNs play exceedingly complicated and pleiotropic roles that are coordinated and regulated through the activity of the family of IFN regulatory factors, or IRFs [17]. IRF9 is most directly involved in anti-viral as well as anti-tumor immunity and genetic regulation [18-20].

Basically, interferons are critical players in the CLEANUP OF GENETIC BAD GUYS CAUSING TROUBLE. Those genetic bad guys can be EXTERNAL WRONG-GENES (viruses) or they can be ROGUE CELLS (cancer and the like).

This section then summarizes the complex interactions and feedback loops which characterize anything involving interferons, but particularly related to their anti-cancer role. It is made exceedingly clear that improper interferon levels and disruptions of the complex interferon systems are known to lead very directly to clinical appearance of cancers of various kinds.

Near the end, COVID-19 is brought into the mix. A recent Chinese paper is cited, the work having shown interference with IRF signaling by a non-mRNA, inactivated virus, COVID-19 vaccine. The changes are EXPECTED to reduce resistance to cancers, and the mechanisms are discussed in detail. ELEGANTLY, those same mechanisms are found in Alzheimer’s patients, and appear related to development of dementia symptoms that sound remarkably like COVID brain fog.

Finally, a documented case of a rare lymphoma being accelerated by the Pfizer vaccine is described, and a summary statement is given:

Given the universally recognized importance of optimally functioning BRCA1/2 for cancer prevention and given the central role of the TRAIL signal transduction pathway for additional cancer surveillance, the suppression of IRF7 and IRF9 through vaccination and subsequent spike protein production is extremely concerning for long-term cancer control in injected populations.

Considerations in the Design of mRNA Vaccines

This section basically describes the long list of HACKS – many of them very ELEGANT HACKS – that were needed to get all the way from Robert Malone’s initial discovery which enabled mRNA gene therapy, to where mRNA vaccines are today.

The implications of all these hacks for relevant IMMUNOLOGICAL and GENETIC biochemistry, including INTERFERONS and CANCER, are described.

This section SETS UP the long list of concerns which are going to necessarily follow.

Quite a bit of attention is paid to the components of the lipid nanoparticles, their roles, and their potential risks and side-effects.

This section is fairly readable, and if you’re curious about the various hacks, and particularly the purpose and mechanism of the lipid nanoparticles, then you may enjoy reading past the jargon.

GC enrichment and potential G4 (pG4) structures in vaccine mRNAs

This is a difficult section to understand, if you’re not familiar with DNA and RNA “beyond the double helix”. It’s a bit like Morse code. Everybody knows what Morse code is, and maybe how to do an “SOS”, but not many people remember Morse code well enough to compose and send long signals at will, let alone send a telegram. OTOH, if you’re in genetic medicine or biology, you may be familiar with more than just 4 bases and the double helix.

The bottom line is that, among the various hacks that have gone into the mRNA vaccines, some of them are basically “genetic tricks” to increase production of spike protein. The PROBLEM with that, is that the FINAL implications of some of these tricks are not fully known.

Because there is redundancy in the genetic language, and the efficiency of different spellings is not the same (nite vs. night, thru vs. through, etc.), certain things can be re-encoded using the most efficient letters to create MOAR SPIKE PROTEIN. And MOAR is always BETTER. RIIIIIIIIGHT?

Well, it turns out that spellings have implications for how mRNA behaves. How mRNA behaves has implications for things like CANCER.

Going back to the title of this section, “G” and “C” are the efficient bases that are switched to, to make proteins with higher efficiency. The problem THERE is that “G” can do something every interesting – it can bind with itself in a square, to form a quadruple helix called a “G quadruplex”, which is abbreviated G4. See the image above for cross-sections of such a structure, at the point of binding.

There are ways to predict if a G quadruplex will form – these cases are called “pG4” for “potential G quadruplex”.

Midway through the section, this quote:

Summarizing the topic to this point, the enrichment of GC content in vaccine mRNA will inevitably lead to an increase in the pG4 content of the vaccines. This, in turn, will lead to dysregulation of the G4-RNA-protein binding system and a wide range of potential disease-associated cellular pathologies including suppression of innate immunity, neurodegeneration, and malignant transformation [83].

There are further implications. The more mRNA can form these self-shielding quadruplexes, the less that “micro RNAs” – miRNAs – can bind to the mRNA and control the expression. And THAT leads to another cascade of potentially unintended consequences.

The multitude of pG4s in the mRNA of the vaccine would predictably act as decoys, distracting miRNAs from their normal function in regulating human protein expression. The increase in G4 targets due to the vaccine would decrease the availability of miRNAs to target human-expressed G4s for regulation of gene expression. This can result in downregulation of miRNA expression which is implicated in cardiovascular pathology [96], onset of neurodegeneration [97], and/or cancer progression [98].

Type I IFNs and COVID-19

This is a very interesting section on the relationship of interferons to COVID-19. It appears that:

lower levels of interferons lead to more severe COVID-19 outcomes
IFNs can be used for treatment early, but make things worse if given late
interferons seem to prevent infection by COVID-19
this would explain enhanced susceptibility to COVID-19 after vaccination
COVID patients with antibodies against interferons are common in severe cases

Interferons are clearly key, and look to be one of the most significant differences between the disease and the vaccine.

Are the methylation strategies for cellular housekeeping generally omitted by vaccine mRNAs?

This is a rhetorical question about one of the hacks used by the mRNA vaccines.

To put it a bit too simply, the synthetic mRNA is “capped” both to evade detection AND to generate more spike protein, and most likely without regard for downstream unintended consequences, due to the fact that capping is normally supposed to be both a signaling and a regulating mechanism. The “hack” abuses this feature to make more spike protein.

Rather than simply making an accusation, the question is asked, whether the hack accounted for some of the more likely consequences.

E.g., …..

Furthermore, this also means that eIF4E, which is a powerful oncogene regulator and cell proliferation modulator, will sustain its activities by this competition, for an unnaturally prolonged period of time, trying to counterbalance the competition between robustly-capped mRNAs in vaccines and IRES-containing mRNAs[113,65]. This type of condition results in dysregulation of co-transcriptional m6A mRNA modiﬁcations and seriously links to molecular progressions of various cancers [114], as well as creating predisposing conditions for subsequent viral infections [113].

My money is on the idea that nobody in the management chain at Pfizer or Moderna gave a flying F, because Fauci and Walensky are all about the antibodies. This is a CLASSIC downstream effect of antibody hypnosis.

Exosomes and MicroRNAs

This is an interesting grab-bag of stuff, and it’s not that hard to follow, for the most part, so you may want to read it.

Exosomes are basically little bubbles of cell that break off and carry crap, a lot like “virus-like particles” or even “lipid nanoparticles”. It turns out that much of the spike protein which is produced in vaccine-infected cells LEAVES THE SCENE inside exosomes, or studded into their surface. This was in fact discovered by a group in India.

Also, under conditions of overwhelming production of spike protein due to SARS-CoV-2 molecular vaccination, it would of course be expected that a signiﬁcant proportion of over-abundant intra-cellular spikeproteins would also be exported via exosome cargoes [128]. A seminal paper by a research team in India investigated the role of exosomes in the cellular response to internally synthesized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [50]. They wrote in the abstract:“We propose that SARS-CoV-2 gene product, Spike, is able to modify the host exosomal cargo, which gets transported to distant uninfected tissues and organs and can initiate a catastrophic immune cascade within Central Nervous System (CNS).”

Things get even worse. It turns out that these exosomes also carry micro-RNAs that turn off interferons in the distant places to which they carry the spike protein.

Thus, the available evidence strongly suggests that endogenously produced spike protein creates a diﬀerent microRNA proﬁle than does natural infection with SARS-CoV-2, and those diﬀerences entail a potentially wide range of deleterious eﬀects.
A central point of our analysis below is the important distinction between the impact of vaccination versus natural infection on type I IFN. While vaccination actively suppresses its production, natural infection promotes type I IFN production very early in the disease cycle. Those with preexisting conditions often exhibit impaired type I IFN signaling, which leads to more severe, critical, and even fatal COVID-19. If the impairment induced by the vaccine is maintained as antibody levels wane over time, this could lead to a situation where the vaccine causes a more severe disease expression than would have been the case in the absence of the vaccine.
Another expected consequence of suppressing type I IFN would be reactivation of preexisting, chronic viral infections, as described in the next section.

SO – this would explain “vaccine-induced disease enhancement” – not antibody-dependent (ADE), but rather interferon-dependent (IDE). And in this case, it could be significantly different diseases that are being enhanced, because of the generality of the interferon network.

Speaking of which…..

Reactivation of Varicella-zoster

Fully consistent with the proposed vaccine-induced negative effects on interferon signaling, would be the significant number of cases of shingles appearing post-vaccination with the mRNA vaccines.

There is also a documented case of viral hepatitis flaring up because of the vaccine.

An additional case of viral reactivation is noteworthy as well. It involved an 82-year-old woman who had acquired a hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection in 2007. A strong increase in HCV load occurred a few days after vaccination with an mRNA Pﬁzer/BioNTech vaccine, along with an appearance of jaundice. She died three weeks after vaccination from liver failure [142].

Personally, I have no desire to get shingles again.

Impaired DNA Repair and Adaptive Immunity

As stated – more examples from the literature.

We have to speed up here. This is a long paper.

Immune Thrombocytopenia

This is your “clot shot” mechanism, explained.

This quote is interesting.

It has been shown that the mRNA vaccines elicit primarily an immunoglobulin G (IgG) immune response, with lesser amounts of IgA induced [155], and even less IgM production [156]. The amount of IgG antibodies produced is comparable to the response seen in severe cases of COVID-19. It is IgG antibodies in complex with heparin that induce HIT. One can hypothesize that IgG complexed with the spike protein and PF4 is the complex that induces VITT in response to mRNA vaccines. It has in fact been shown experimentally that the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein binds to PF4 [157].

PPAR-α, Sulfatide and Liver Disease

Two paragraphs are worthy of your attention.

As we have already stated, an experiment by Mishra and Banerjea (2021) demonstrated that the spike protein induces the release of exosomes containing microRNAs that speciﬁcally interfere with IRF9 synthesis[50]. In this section we will show that one of the consequences of suppression of IRF9 would be reduced synthesis of sulfatide in the liver, mediated by the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPAR-α).
…
Multiple case reports in the research literature describe liver damage following mRNA vaccines [165-167]. A plausible factor leading to these outcomes is the suppression of PPAR-α through downregulation of IRF9,and subsequently decreased sulfatide synthesis in the liver.

As you can see, there is a prediction here, and plenty of room to investigate.

Guillain Barre Syndrome and Other Neurological Conditions

This is worth reading. There is a laundry list of neurological conditions clearly attributed to the vaccine, and a clear mechanism by which they happen.

Bell’s Palsy

A known problem which appeared during the clinical trials of the mRNA vaccines.

Placebo 1, Treatment 7. Do the math.

Myocarditis

Signals and mechanisms are discussed. Particularly compelling is the proposed role of exosomes in carrying the toxic spike to cardiac tissue.

My money is still on migrating vaccine, but AND LOGIC will do for now.

Considerations Regarding the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

The underreporting of the system is discussed, with some doubt about the commonly cited figure of “100X” underreporting, as well as mention of a more sophisticated figure of 31X obtained by Rose.

VAERS Signal for Immune Suppression, Thrombocytopenia and Neurodegeneration

A comparison of the data from COVID vaccines to ALL OTHER VACCINES COMBINED is made, and the results are impressive.

Many different things are listed. It’s worth looking at.

VAERS Signal for Cancer

After detailing the numbers for cancer (nice table), where the mRNA vaccines have HUGE numbers compared to all other vaccines combined, this statement:

This cannot be explained by reference to a disproportionately large number of people receiving an mRNA vaccination in the past year compared to all other vaccinations. The total number of people receiving a non-COVID-19 vaccination is unknown, but over the 31 years history of reports VAERS contains it is unquestionably many orders of magnitude larger than the number receiving an mRNA vaccination in the past year. Overall, in the above table, twice as many cancer reports to VAERS are related to a COVID-19 vaccination compared to those related to all other vaccines. That, in our opinion, constitutes a signal in urgent need of investigation.

To me, this is enough to say that the mRNA vaccines are related to cancer. Period.

Discussion

This is worth reading:

There has been an unwavering message about the safety and eﬃcacy of mRNA vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 from the public health apparatus in the US and around the globe. The eﬃcacy is increasingly in doubt, as shown in a recent letter to the Lancet Regional Health by G¨unter Kampf [215]. Kampf provided data showing that the vaccinated are now as likely as the unvaccinated to spread disease. He concluded:“It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.”
In this paper we call attention to three very important aspects of the safety proﬁle of these vaccinations. First is the extensively documented subversion of innate immunity, primarily via suppression of IFN-α and its associated signaling cascade. This suppression will have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to eﬀectively combat future infections. Second is the dysregulation of the system for both preventing and detecting genetically driven malignant transformation within cells and the consequent potential for vaccination to promote those transformations. Third, mRNA vaccination potentially disrupts intracellular communication carried out by exosomes, and induces cells taking up spike mRNA to produce high levels of spike-carrying exosomes, with potentially serious inﬂammatory consequences. Should any of these potentials be fully realized, the impact on billions of people around the world could be enormous and could contribute to both the short-term and long-term disease burden our health care system faces.
Given the current rapidly expanding awareness of the multiple roles of G4s in regulation of mRNA translation and clearance through stress granules, the increase in pG4s due to enrichment of GC content as a consequence of codon optimization has unknown but likely far-reaching consequences. Speciﬁc analytical evaluation of the safety of these constructs in vaccines is urgently needed, including mass spectrometry for identiﬁcation of cryptic expression and immunoprecipitation studies to evaluate the potential for disturbance of or interference with the essential activities of RNA and DNA binding proteins.

This is what I was talking about at the beginning. There is enough here for an enormous amount of productive research on the downside of these vaccines. It’s EASY RESULTS. Maybe not easy grant money, but plenty of easy CLOUT when it’s all over.

This does NOT go back in the toothpaste tube.

Conclusions

Presented in whole:

It is imperative that worldwide administration of the mRNA vaccinations be stopped immediately until further studies are conducted to determine the extent of the potential pathological consequences outlined in this paper. It is not possible for these vaccinations to be considered part of a public health campaign without a detailed analysis of the human impact of the potential collateral damage. It is also imperative that VAERS and other monitoring system be optimized to detect signals related to the health consequences of mRNA vaccination we have outlined. We believe the upgraded VAERS monitoring system described in the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study, but unfortunately not supported by the CDC, would be a valuable start in this regard [208].
In the end, we are not exaggerating to say that billions of lives are at stake. We call on the public health institutions to demonstrate, with evidence, why the issues discussed in this paper are not relevant to public health, or to acknowledge that they are and to act accordingly. Until our public health institutions do what is right in this regard, we encourage all individuals to make their own health care decisions with this information as a contributing factor in those decisions.

That’s where I’m at. Do not take the clot shot. Do not give it to your kids. Tell people how you honestly feel.

I am OK with people having the freedom to take a bad vaccine, but I personally think that coercing anybody in the slightest to take it, is a CRIME.

If you’re scared of getting or giving COVID, there are far better ways to deal with it, than a bad vaccine that does a lot of damage.

Can the mRNA Vaccines Be Fixed?

That’s MY question.

I suspect that they CAN be fixed, but not for at least several years – maybe 5-10, if we’re lucky.

Until then, they should be taken off the market, IMO.

Hopefully antigen vaccines will do better, but if they don’t, we can fall back to treatment and “real” immunity.

Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

wolven

noun

Of or pertaining to wolves; wolflike; wolfish.

Used in a sentence:

Adjectives for wolf include wolfish, wolfless, wolflike, wolfly, wolfy, wolven, wolvish, wolfed, wolfing, wolved and wolving.

(If you can find a better one, please add it to the comments!)

ENJOY THE SHOW

W

DEAR KAG: 20220204 – The Pub is OPEN / The End of the mRNA Vaccines / Bad Medicine as a Weapon of War / Mayor Gramsci III’s War On Freedom of Movement

The Pub is OPEN!

We may serve “off-label” drinks here, including hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and truck diesel, but we don’t serve spike protein, remdesivir, or anything made in Wuhan, Chinazia.

While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.

Christmas Spirit

Feel free to celebrate the birth of Christ any time. We’re dragging it out this year! One MORE month of Christmas begins!

Hey – where’s Santa? We need his famous line about his VP!

And now, the rules of the pub.

HOUSE RULES

Now, back to business.

AMEN!

#FJB – Free the January Brothers

Current Art On The Wall

This is another off-beat shipment. “Spice” is all it said on the box. Let’s take a look.

I am informed that this one has something to do with the “Spice Islands”.

This one is related to Morocco. I think I see some kind of actually trustworthy pharmaceuticals, although it also looks a bit like that “pot-poury” stuff.

Not sure what this one is, other than what’s on the label – “Moroccan Spice”.

This one is also labeled “Moroccan Spice”, with a reference URL. I am informed by an expert that this genre of art is something known as “purse porn”.

**https://www.mynewsdesk.com/sg/tanandbrown/images/ava-martin-moroccan-spice-editorial-chaise-photo-87783**

OK – now it’s starting to look like actual art. This one even had a reasonable price tag.

**https://amywhitehousepaintings.blogspot.com/2012/01/lets-cook-6×8-oil-painting-of-cooking.html**

This one is even cheaper. $9.99 at Walmart. Well, it’s FREE here!

**Still Life with Spices and Olive Oil Food Still Life Kitchen Photo Print Wall Art By Andrii Gorulko**

More in the same genre, but with a nod to local astronomers and others like me who enjoy looking at the sky at night and going WTF.

**Baking For Stargazers by Dina Belenko**

This is a trick to flush out any kids on this site.

If you ever saw one of these in real life, you’re a kid, or you had some. Or both!

And then somebody decided to get cute with the jukebox…..

On The Jukebox

This is from the early days, when the “talent” was just getting started, and it shows.

Here’s where the “spice” started flowing to the cabal coffers, and the recruits were now famous for being famous. Different fan-exciting material was possible…..

I was going to queue up some of their reunion material, but I absolutely cannot take any more of it.

SO ENJOY.

There – that’s better!

OK, I cannot leave you with that earworm, so I’m going to perform a really neat trick.

The following performance is by a similar “girl group” in Japan, doing a number called “Spice“. Because it’s designed to infect the brains of Japanese and not Westerners, it’s essentially white noise MK to gai-jin, and will erase the Spice Girls stuff.

WE HOPE.

You can turn on English captions to see what they’re saying.

Because this group “Perfume” rides on a more techno/electronica carrier wave, and comes in at a more “artistic” level than the Spice Girls, it actually gets MUCH more respect than the Spice Girls, in both the East and the West. Many people regard it as techno art-pop rather than J-pop. But don’t kid yourself. Down deep, it’s still a “girl band”. These ladies are huge cultural celebrities in Japan, just like the Spice Girls remain in England, even disbanded.

And thus we return to reality.

Or do we?

THE SPICE MUST FLOW

And now for our feature presentation…..

The End of the mRNA Vaccines

This topic right here is just a WARM-UP for my Monday post, which will explain WHY these particular mRNA vaccines are OVER. GONE. KAPUT. DONE.

You want to know why Joe Rogan / Spotify happened?

Pfizer-CNN-DNC-BlackRock-[CB]-Mr.Global can’t attack Drs. Malone and McCullough directly, at this CRITICAL MOMENT, so they FAKED IT, and attacked Joe Rogan to indirectly “prove” that Malone and McCullough are providing “misinformation”.

That is how desperate they are.

Sorry.

As China said to the Biden administration, “You are dealing from a position of weakness.”

The TRUTH is a SOLID FORTRESS.

“They” are in so much trouble.

And Malone and McCullough are in the CATBIRD SEAT.

There are tens of billions – hundreds of billions – maybe trillions of dollars on the line, and those dollars are not just on a rickety foundation – they are on QUICKSAND.

Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy – https://t.co/OdHXdATzTo
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) February 3, 2022

(H/T FG&C)

You can understand the panic. And it will only get worse.

First, I want you to watch this video, and understand that every word you hear is 100 times truer than even those people realized when they said those things.

The truth pic.twitter.com/OxFO7bOnxI
— Frontline Freedom (@FrontlineFree) January 31, 2022

Now I want you to understand WHY.

Hat tip to Gail Combs for cluing me in to this very recent paper, which I expect to come under merciless attack, but it won’t do any good.

This paper may NEVER reach or pass “peer review”, but it doesn’t matter. Even if it NEVER passes peer review, the payload has been delivered.

The paper has DETONATED in information space.

More “cautious” scientists will BET THEIR CAREERS on the truth therein, and “discover” everything discussed here, but in slower, politically correct, and damage-controlling ways.

Limited damage control remains possible if “they” are extremely lucky and drop mandates world-wide NOW. But as long as their side keeps forcing mandates, the WOODEN STAKE OF TRUTH will be driven into the VAMPIRE HEARTS OF PFIZER, MODERNA, AND ALL WHO BACKED THE CLOT SHOT.

GOVERNMENTS are going to FALL.

I think that SOMEBODY knew this paper was coming.

Once you see WHY the mRNA vaccines are fundamentally flawed, you can’t unsee it.

Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs

January 2022

DOI:10.22541/au.164276411.10570847/v1

Project: COVID 19

Authors:

Stephanie Seneff

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Greg Nigh

Immersion Health

Anthony Kyriakopoulos

Nasco AD Biotech Lab

Peter A McCullough

[Could have said “Baylor College of Medicine”, but they were FOOLS!]

ABSTRACT

LINK: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs

I will go through this in more detail on Monday.

I was only part-way through the body of the paper, when I realized that if even a fraction of it is correct, the mRNA vaccines are as good as over.

Worse than that, other non-mRNA vaccines are likely subject to many of the same concerns.

It may very well be that vaccination is a poor strategy for this virus, SARS-CoV-2.

BUT ONE THING IS CERTAIN.

Now that there is a clean, elegant, and intellectually appealing explanation of the adversity of the mRNA clot shot, which happens to align perfectly with common sense, mandates are murder.

Do not back down. Do not give up. We are on the right side of this.

I will explain.

SOON.

Bad Medicine as a Weapon of War

If you ever find yourself weakening on NOT GETTING THE CLOT SHOT – (and I’ve actually run into some of these failure-of-will cases in real life, so it’s not impossible) – try to remember just ONE of the items discussed below.

Don’t let Chinazia and the Globonazis inject you with their Slow-Motion Koolaid designed to assassinate America.

What follows are several items (or groups of items), many of which have been sitting around in my tabs, which have been bothering me. I have been TRYING to fit them into a pure and simple negligence scheme, and I simply can’t.

There is a highly destructive and very intentional aspect to all that has happened, that defies letting us categorize “Obamacare and what came after it” as mere stupidity.

insurance data showing manifold increased deaths of military-aged people, mostly men
- https://www.thecentersquare.com/indiana/indiana-life-insurance-ceo-says-deaths-are-up-40-among-people-ages-18-64/article_71473b12-6b1e-11ec-8641-5b2c06725e2c.html
- https://archive.fo/9p1TP
British ONS data showing increased deaths among children AFTER vaccination began
- https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/24/child-deaths-increasing-since-offered-covid-vaccine/
vaccine failure to reduce all-cause mortality AFTER excess deaths due to COVID-19
- https://beckernews.com/exclusive-its-game-over-for-the-cdc-if-these-death-rates-hold-true-43385/
lack of association between vaccination and new cases of COVID-19
- https://pjmedia.com/columns/stacey-lennox/2021/10/28/a-shocking-study-on-vaccine-rates-and-covid-19-you-may-have-missed-n1527669
funeral home director with validating mortality data
- https://www.kla.tv/21382
pathologist Ryan Cole with validating mortality and morbidity data
- https://stuartbramhall.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/dr-ryan-cole-explains-how-the-covid-vaccines-compromise-the-immune-system/
- https://www.brighteon.com/898419ab-e36f-43a5-8700-e0e35b126273
cardiac deaths of athletes, students, normies, and children under stress
- https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/12/japan_warns_of_cardiac_health_risks_from_covid_vaccines.html
Pfizer hiding vaccine migration, while misleading toward spike migration per se
- https://www.theqtree.com/2021/05/31/the-spike-proteins-purpose-betrayed-by-its-own-superiority/
Hoffe’s data on post-vaccination D-dimer testing and pulmonary insufficiency
- https://www.theqtree.com/2021/10/13/dr-charles-hoffes-observation-of-spike-protein-mrna-vaccine-induced-pulmonary-hypertension/
the toxic batch phenomenon, IMO, likely due to mRNA vaccine overdoses
- https://www.theqtree.com/2022/01/21/dear-kag-20220121-the-pub-is-open-the-anti-saline-theory-and-the-toxic-batch-problem/
clearly duplicitous mischaracterization of post-vaccination deaths as COVID-19
- a.k.a. “14 days to hide the data”
- https://joannenova.com.au/2021/12/blockbuster-paper-covid-vaccines-may-not-improve-your-chances-of-staying-alive-at-all-even-in-a-pandemic/
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356756711_Latest_statistics_on_England_mortality_data_suggest_systematic_mis-categorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination
- https://notrickszone.com/2022/01/21/analysis-by-german-prof-thousands-of-hidden-deaths-daily-may-be-greatest-medical-debacle-in-human-history/
- https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/alberta-canada-inadvertently-published-quickly-deleted-health-data-exposing-half-vaccinated-deaths-counted-unvaccinated/
- https://twitter.com/mdccclxx/status/1482322142041673734
- https://metatron.substack.com/p/alberta-just-inadvertently-confessed
- https://archive.fo/R6w2z
promotion of toxic loser drug remdesivir to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection
- https://www.theqtree.com/2021/09/20/the-murder-of-veronica-wolski-by-fauci-and-gileads-zyklon-d/
“programming” the remdesivir treatment at a point in the disease when there is no virus
- https://www.theqtree.com/2021/09/20/the-murder-of-veronica-wolski-by-fauci-and-gileads-zyklon-d/
“programming” hospitals with cash incentives to kill using vents and remdesivir
- https://rense.com/general96/hospitals-are-being-bribed.php
Joe Biden and SecDef “Idi Amin” Austen mandating bad vaccines for the military
- https://clarion.causeaction.com/2022/01/27/whistleblower-bombshell-dod-medical-data-reveals-surges-in-oft-cited-vaxx-adverse-events-in-2021/
WEF and Klaus Schwab turning up like bad pennies at every juncture in COVID-19
- https://www.globalresearch.ca/klaus-schwabs-wefs-school-for-covid-dictators-a-plan-for-the-great-reset/5764929

And now the final straw that breaks the camel’s back

the “Trusted News Initiative” which was ready to tamp down knowledge of bad vaccines
- https://www.theqtree.com/2022/01/31/covid-and-beyond-fake-news-the-trusted-news-initiative/

I know you have limited time, but of all those links, I would suggest the following article and the following video.

Klaus Schwab’s WEF “School for Covid Dictators”, a Plan for the “Great Reset”

LINK: https://www.globalresearch.ca/klaus-schwabs-wefs-school-for-covid-dictators-a-plan-for-the-great-reset/5764929

LINK: https://www.kla.tv/21382

LINK: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/never-seen-many-deaths-around-500-600-increase-funeral-director-uk-reveals-increasing-number-death-vaccinated-young-adults/

Hat tips to RAC, Aubergine and Linda, for bringing the full extent of this one to my attention.

Further hat tips to those who brought all the other “tabbed” items above.

To me, this is only explained by what amounts to a secret “war” against the United States. Not everybody fighting on “their” side knows everything. In fact, almost all of them know nothing. But I think that Tony Fauci, Hillary Clinton, and a few others either know the entirety of the plot, or are following orders without question.

Their mission is based on ideas that America is bad and responsible for every bad thing, and that America and Americans need to be disempowered and punished for it.

Thus, like the general idea that Obama wasn’t as much “for Russia” or “for China” as he was “against America”, we can see that the modern Democrat party is now an embodiment of skepticism about, if not antipathy toward, America and Americans themselves.

Here’s the video and the URL, which long ago disappeared from YouTube.

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XqreFRHoXTFX/

In my opinion, this all goes back to the Soviet-supported MAOIST Weather Underground types of the late 60s and early 70s, who were actively planning a revolution in which 25 million Americans would need to be killed. This is around the same time that Klaus Schwab got his start. INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH.

There are basically two sides – individual freedom and state control. In the past we’ve tended to have wars which were not cleanly on that boundary, such as Hitler vs. Stalin, but I think THIS ONE is fairly clean. “They” try to make “free forces” fight each other, which is very smart, but I think we’re wising up.

They HAD to have known that, without getting the guns, they could never defeat us ON AMERICAN SOIL.

It HAD to be gradual. It HAD to be Sun Tzu. It HAD to be carried out by Americans, on American soil.

I am really thinking now that SOMEBODY on the radical left realized that they could not set up CAMPS unless we were fully under the grip of socialism, like China or North Korea, BUT that until such a time, there WERE ways to trick us into allowing ourselves to be killed.

Disease used as a weapon of war can be efficient, but it’s obvious. But using the medicine allegedly meant to TREAT a disease as a weapon of war is NOT obvious.

Turning our own medical system against us is a cruel and cynical method of war, but I have to admit that it’s rather brilliant.

It’s a sobering thought.

Something is very wrong here. Stay frosty. I think that they’re trying to get as much as they can WITHOUT WAR, before they actually go TO WAR.

And speaking of WAR……

Mayor Gramsci III’s War On Freedom of Movement

The son of the torch-bearer of Antonin Gramsci, a founding father of cultural Marxism, is not exactly undamaged goods. As you can see above, Pothole Pete was (assuming this bit of news is not completely phony) a PRETTY SICK KID.

People like that are PSYCHOPATHS. Pet murderers rarely turn into saints. There is usually something VERY wrong with them – something that does NOT go away without a lot of GOD in the process.

Personally, I don’t care to push a campaign against “Mayor Pete” over his alleged juvenile criminality. There is a reason that juvenile records are sealed. Many if not most people “get serious” at the point of LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY. They grow up. Bad kids can turn out good. However, I still think Kid Pete’s history is relevant to Secretary Pete’s personality.

We’ve gotta KEEP OUR EYE on this boy.

I suspect that many people are glad “Possible Pet-Killer Pete” is “only” Secretary of Transportation. Still, he could do a LOT of damage there. For example, that office could be a real problem for an American truckers’ strike.

Trust me, Pete Buttigieg is not here to fix the roads. He is a typical communist control freak who is going to take our freedoms away if we don’t take him seriously.

And taking Pothole Pete seriously is hard. Because on the surface, the guy is SUCH a DOUFUS.

He wouldn’t hurt a fly – right?

So when this infuriating poser bicyclist idiot does something like this…..

“Our Goal is Zero Traffic Deaths” – Buttigieg Announces New Federal Strategy to Combat Traffic Fatalities (VIDEO)

LINK: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/goal-zero-traffic-deaths-buttigieg-announces-new-federal-strategy-combat-traffic-fatalities-video/

…..one is tempted to view this as merely stupid and impossible.

DO NOT make that mistake.

“Zero traffic deaths” is not only a fundamentally and intentionally MISDIRECTED GOAL that has a “feel-good” appearance of self-justification – which leverages our wish to “do the impossible” – it is CODE for all of the following:

personal transportation for the elite only
Mercedes for the elite – Chinese Trabants for luckier serfs
where you live becomes determined by your job
Soviet-level, corrupt, inefficient public transit for plebes
no freedom of movement – internal passporting
omnipresent cameras and surveillance, just like China
TSA internal control, “papers, please”, and all the rest

This is how these ASSHOES bring CHINA to AMERICA.

Zero traffic deaths is just like MOAR ANTIBODIES.

A PHONY and MISLEADING GOAL.

Now, before we get to the fact that we simply have to stop this crazy commie twerp, you need to know him better.

A great AUDIO will help.

Notice how PRESCIENT this talk is, right at the beginning.

You will ALSO love the end, when you realize that TRUMP is headed straight into confrontation with this joker.

LINK: https://sovereignnations.com/2021/10/22/buttigieg-and-gramsci-public-occurrences-ep-39/

I invite you to resolve to NEVER accept what Pet-Killer Pete has in store for us.

NEVER. EVER. Accept it.

All that is left is HOW you choose to resist this guy.

Have a great weekend, and don’t forget to…..

ENJOY THE SHOW.

Because frustrating evil and stopping future sorrow is rewarding for a reason.

W

THE SALT MUST FLOW

Big Pharma – Government – University Collusion on COVID Vaccines

Newly Uncovered COVID Vaccine Contracts Lead Unexpectedly to Academic Corruption and Shill Science Attacks on Honest, Skeptical Scientists

A Gail Combs deep dive into a tangent of Karen Kingston’s latest revelation on Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine deaths and injuries, leads back to the war against truth-telling doctors and scientists – this time by their own CORRUPT university employers.

PREFACE by Wolf Moon

Remember people saying that there was no such thing as the “FDA-approved” Comirnaty version of the Pfizer vaccine in existence?

Well, it turns out that REAL, LIVE COMIRNATY is out there, it has already killed over 50 people [in VAERS – yeah – do the math – x20 (1000), x40 (2000), or x100 (5000)], and – now even more shocking – there was some kind of bureaucratic screw-up in the contract and approval process which makes Pfizer LIABLE for all the deaths and injuries.

Look – I don’t know about the latter part – that’s “the law”, which is basically filled with LIES at this point. Whether any of these people will ever answer for anything is highly debatable, in my opinion.

But that’s not where this goes.

Gail Combs started looking at this video, and discovered ANOTHER scandal – the fact that universities which are silencing and firing honest doctors and scientists are not doing so from some misperception or moral high ground. These universities are turning on honest doctors and scientists because the universities themselves are COMPROMISED – by money, corruption, and the involvement of OTHER scientists at those same universities in the “scamdemic”.

We don’t yet know how deep this goes, but we do know this – the universities are clearly in cover-up mode. It’s not just limited to the vaccines. Fauci’s horrifying executioner remdesivir was forwarded past Trump, thanks to “work” done at one such university.

Follow along with Gail and you’ll see the SHAME of what has happened to many American universities, once bastions of free thinking and HONESTY – now CORRUPT and enemies of TRUTH.

-Wolf

START HERE….

FDA Broke Pfizer’s EUA Shield: Liability Protection Gone, Time To Bring Down The Gavel (10 minutes)

Stew Peters Show, Published January 26, 2022

LINK: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/01/fda-broke-pfizers-eua-shield-liability-protection-gone-time-to-bring-down-the-gavel/

LINK: https://rumble.com/vtcugv-fda-broke-pfizers-eua-shield-liability-protection-gone-time-to-bring-down-t.html

Stew Peters interviews former Pfizer employee and analyst Karen Kingston, who does deep dives into patents and contracts. She found the three major contracts for Moderna, J&J and Pfizer.

Stew: “Karen says she found contracts showing the DOD was in control of what data went to the FDA from vaccine trials. If that is true, then DOD not Big Pharm, was the central figure in any vaccine cover-up…. Military leaders maybe exposed as well…. When the FDA approved the Pfizer vax under the name Cormirnaty, it somehow broke their immunity shield.”

That is not exactly correct. DOD delegated it to Pfizer. With the Pfizer contract with the US Army, it appears that, it was delegated to Pfizer to have the ability to manipulate the data that was submitted to the FDA.

With the Moderna contract for example it shows HHS [US Dept of Health & Human Services] had the authority to manipulate the data that was submitted to the FDA. The contract date is 4/03/2020 for ½ billion $$$ with NIH subsidizing a lot of the contract. It was for producing 100 million mRNA vaccines. The contract (shown) states:

* Contractor shall submit draft FDA submission to BARDA at least 15 days prior to FDA submission
* BARDA will provide feedback to Contractor within 10 days of receipts
* The Contractor MUST address, in writing its consideration of all concerns raised by BARDA prior to FDA Submission.

NOTICE THE DATE 4/03/202. No wonder they wanted to kill HCQ in April!

April 7, 2020 Trump’s Critics Attack His Optimistic Case for Hydroxychloroquine

Karen goes on to say that the contract says that BARDA can provide EDITS to the Data and THAT gets submitted to the FDA. She has never seen anything like this before. This [editing] is why the data was so phenomenally positive. This explains why the Whistle Blowers at Ron Johnson’s Formun found the DOD data had been ‘edited’ to remove the tons of adverse events.

She also said a lot of that contract is redacted including the Key personnel at BARDA .

The J&J contract of an mRNA vaccine was signed 08-Apr-2015 and 60 out of the 90 pages are redacted.

She then goes into the most recent contract. It is a joint mission of Dept of Defense and Dept of Health & Human services who contract with Pfizer/BoiNTech “for the co-development and distribution (excluding China) of a potential mRNA-based Coronavirus vaccine aimed at preventing Covid-19 infection“….. LOTS OF REDACTION….

The Research Collaboration & License Agreement
by and between
PFIZER INC.
and
BIONTECH RNA PHARMACEUTICALS GmbH [Germany]
and
BIOTECH AG
July 20, 2018

Again the DATE July 20 2018 shows mRNA vaccines for the next outbreak of Covid WAS A DONE DEAL!

@5:00 Karen EXPLAINS the OOPS in the Contract. You can not have a contract for commercialization WITHOUT A FDA APPROVAL DATE!!! So how in Hades did they KNOW there would be FDA APPROVAL? This shows it was PRE-PLANNED IN 2018.

@7:00 She also found the Cormirnaty lots used in the USA and the VAERs data

LOT NUMBERS
FD7220
FE3592
FF2587
FF2588
FF2590
FF2593
FF8841
VAERS Dec 2021
Deaths = 51
Disabilities = 94
Hospitalizations 415

So who is BARDA?

Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)

WE ARE BARDA
The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, provides an integrated, systematic approach to the development of the necessary vaccines, drugs, therapies, and diagnostic tools for public health medical emergencies such as chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) accidents, incidents and attacks, pandemic influenza, and emerging infectious diseases.
Together with our industry partners, BARDA promotes the advanced development of medical countermeasures to protect Americans and respond to 21st century health security threats.

About NIH | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
A part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIH is the largest biomedical research agency in the world

So there is your Fauci connection.

And that brings me to the digging I have been doing.

I start with the Chair of the COVID VACCINE ADVISORY BOARD, Hana El Sahly, M.D. of Baylor College of Medicine. She is the one who wrote the Remdesivir paper for Fauci, just in the nick of time so he could get that toxin approved for the use in hospitalized elderly Covid patients.

Baylor College rang a major bell with me. This Yahoo News articles shows why:

August 2, 2021

Dr. Peter McCullough Sued by Baylor After Appearance on Stew Peters Show…

Dr. Peter McCullough is being sued by the healthcare system that just mandated 40,000 employees to get the jab, and they’re doing it out of spite. Here’s the list of emails to those targeting him, if you wish to let them know how you feel….

Sidebar by Wolf – Dr. McCullough on Stew Peters

I dare anybody to watch this and find anything wrong with anything that Peter McCullough is saying. He is basically admitting – at a time when social media was still removing people for saying as much – that the vaccines seemed to no longer be working. And NOW we know why – because of the delta variant.

LINK: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/08/stew-peters-show-dr-peter-mccullough-destroys-vaxx-efficacy-narrative-united-pilots-file-suit-to-stop-mandate/

LINK: https://rumble.com/vlblnr-dr.-peter-mccullough-destroys-vaxx-efficacy-narrative-united-pilots-file-su.html

Dec 20 2021

Doctor fired for spreading COVID misinformation finds supportive Crowd in Bartlesville.

Dr. Peter McCullough, a Dallas cardiologist who is largely discredited by the scientific community [Remember Dr McCullough is the MOST PUBLISHED AUTHOR OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN THE USA.] for his assertions that the COVID-19 vaccines are unsafe and that early treatment options have been suppressed….
While McCullough said that doctors were probably afraid to show up to the event, one of Oklahoma’s top infectious disease physicians, Dr. Anuj Malik, director of infection prevention and control at Ascension St. John, said that the doctors he spoke to were not afraid to attend. They were just not interested in sitting through what would be seen as a “politically-motivated, ideological speech by a modern-day quack.”
Malik said. “With all due respect, none of McCullough’s ideas have been supported by any randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials,” [<=== THIS IS ALWAYS THE EXCUSE! NO data is allowed except that PAID FOR BY BIG PHARMA/NIH.]
McCullough shared what he said was a threatening letter from the American Board of Internal Medicine warning that he could lose his certification for spreading misinformation.
There is likely a good reason for his concern about losing certification. A Dallas County court granted a temporary restraining order against him in July on behalf of Baylor Scott & White Health for continuing to claim titles, including vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center, even after he was fired from Baylor in February.
In addition, an article in Medscape, an online global news source for physicians and healthcare professionals, reported that Texas A&M College of Medicine, Texas Christian University and University of North Texas Health Science Center School of Medicine have also cut ties with McCullough for spreading misinformation….

So the Baylor Connection made me curious.

And looky what I found! No wonder Baylor sued Dr McCollough in the hopes of shutting him up as they entice people to be lab rats!

June 8, 2021

Baylor launches clinical trial for COVID-19 vaccine booster

Researchers at the Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit at Baylor College of Medicine have launched a clinical trial to study the safety and efficacy of a booster dose of the Moderna-mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine…. The study is being conducted by the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Consortium in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health…. “It’s important to determine the magnitude of the immune response after a booster dose in persons who received different vaccines in their initial vaccine regimen. We will also be looking at the safety of a booster dose,” said Dr. Robert Atmar, professor of infectious diseases at Baylor and co-principal investigator of the national study.
This activity is supported by the Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Consortium (IDCRC) through the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (UM1AI148684). The IDCRC, consisting of the Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Units (VTEUs) and the IDCRC Leadership Group, was formed in 2019 to support the planning and implementation of infectious diseases clinical research that efficiently addresses the scientific priorities of NIAID. The consortium includes infectious diseases leaders and clinical researchers from Emory University, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, FHI360, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, New York University, Saint Louis University, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of Rochester, University of Washington, and NIAID. For more information about the IDCRC, please visit www.IDCRC.org.

https://idcrc.org/_includes/images/group_fullv2.jpg

January 21, 2020, Rockville, MD [Above photo]

With presentations from members of the NIAID, the Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Consortium (IDCRC) Leadership Group, and VTEU PIs, the inaugural meeting of the IDCRC began with opening remarks from Anthony Fauci, MD, NIAID director. Session topics featured details on working with the NIAID, the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, and grants management. Breakout sessions facilitated thoughtful discuss on the consortium’s scientific agenda, flu, STIs, malaria, enteric, and emerging diseases, mentoring and career development, special populations, emerging lab sciences, and operations.
https://idcrc.org/about/index.html

Leadership Operations Center

The IDCRC institutions are leaders of influential infectious diseases, immunology and clinical research programs focused on vaccines and STIs at eight top academic institutions and affiliates across the country. The programs, faculty and collaborators at these institutions have exceptional NIH/NIAID network and international connectivity, a history of performing outstanding ID clinical research and the experience and capability of rapidly responding to ID threats.

Bio Robert Atmar

Dr. Atmar is a member of the Baylor Vaccine Research Center and the federally funded Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Unit (VTEU). This research group performs Phase I to Phase IV studies of experimental and licensed vaccines, and Dr. Atmar serves as Principal Investigator or Co-Investigator for the clinical trials. Dr. Atmar and the research group have been involved in important studies that led to the licensure of live attenuated and high dose inactivated influenza virus vaccines. They also have performed many studies evaluating vaccines targeting pandemic influenza, including H5N1, H9N2 and H7N9 viruses, and they have evaluated methods to improve vaccine immunogenicity, including delivery of vaccine by different routes of administration, different dosages, and with different adjuvant preparations. The group has also evaluated vaccines targeting other pathogens, including those with importance to biodefense.

NIH Clinical Trials Baylor: LINK

484 ACTIVE Studies found for: Baylor College of Medicine | Recruiting, Enrolling by invitation Studies

2,625 studies found in data base [Baylor College] and 4195 for just Baylor.
24,250 studies – Just college

224,279 studies – University

SEE:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results/details?cond=&term=university&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=&Search=Search

>

So is there a Robert Atmar – Hana El Sahly connection???

PubMed(dot)Gov lets you search by author name. So I went looking to see if those two authored papers together.

Search for Atmar R
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Atmar+R&sort=date&size=50

AND WELL WELL WELLL the first two out of the BOX!!!

2022 Jan 26.

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Neutralization after mRNA-1273 Booster Vaccination.

Pajon R, Doria-Rose NA, Shen X, Schmidt SD, O’Dell S, McDanal C, Feng W, Tong J, Eaton A, Maglinao M, Tang H, Manning KE, Edara VV, Lai L, Ellis M, Moore KM, Floyd K, Foster SL, Posavad CM, Atmar RL, Lyke KE, Zhou T, Wang L, Zhang Y, Gaudinski MR, Black WP, Gordon I, Guech M, Ledgerwood JE, Misasi JN, Widge A, Sullivan NJ, Roberts PC, Beigel JH, Korber B, Baden LR, El Sahly H, Chalkias S, Zhou H, Feng J, Girard B, Das R, Aunins A, Edwards DK, Suthar MS, Mascola JR, Montefiori DC.

N Engl J Med.

And the Affiliations:

• Moderna, Cambridge, MA.
• National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Bethesda, MD.
• Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
• NIAID, Bethesda, MD.
• Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
• Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
• Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
• University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
• National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
• Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
• Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA.
…..

2022 Jan 26.

Homologous and Heterologous Covid-19 Booster Vaccinations.

Atmar RL, Lyke KE, Deming ME, Jackson LA, Branche AR, El Sahly HM, Rostad CA, Martin JM, Johnston C, Rupp RE, Mulligan MJ, Brady RC, Frenck RW Jr, Bäcker M, Kottkamp AC, Babu TM, Rajakumar K, Edupuganti S, Dobrzynski D, Coler RN, Posavad CM, Archer JI, Crandon S, Nayak SU, Szydlo D, Zemanek JA, Dominguez Islas CP, Brown ER, Suthar MS, McElrath MJ, McDermott AB, O’Connell SE, Montefiori DC, Eaton A, Neuzil KM, Stephens DS, Roberts PC, Beigel JH; DMID 21-0012 Study Group.N Engl J Med.

Affiliation
• From the Departments of Medicine and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (R.L.A., H.M.E.S.), and Sealy Institute for Vaccine Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (R.E.R.); the Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore (K.E.L., M.E.D., K.M.N.), and the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (S.C., S.U.N., P.C.R., J.H.B.) and the Vaccine Research Center (A.B.M., S.E.O.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (L.A.J.), the Departments of Medicine (C.J., T.M.B., M.J. McElrath) and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (C.J., C.M.P.), University of Washington, the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division (C.J., C.M.P., C.P.D.I., E.R.B., M.J. McElrath) and the Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention (D.S., J.A.Z.), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and Seattle Children’s Research Institute (R.N.C.) and the Department of Pediatrics (R.N.C.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle; the Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester, Rochester (A.R.B., D.D.), NYU Langone Vaccine Center and Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York (M.J. Mulligan, A.C.K.), and NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island Vaccine Center Research Clinic and the Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola (M.B.) – all in New York; the Departments of Pediatrics (C.A.R.), Microbiology and Immunology (M.S.S.), and Medicine (S.E., D.S.S.), the Center for Childhood Infections and Vaccines (C.A.R.), Hope Clinic of Emory Vaccine Center (S.E.), Emory Vaccine Center, and Yerkes National Primate Research Center (M.S.S.), Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (C.A.R.) – all in Atlanta; the Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (J.M.M., K.R.); Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati (R.C.B., R.W.F.); and FHI 360 (formerly Family Health International) (J.I.A.) and Duke Human Vaccine Institute (D.C.M.) and the Department of Surgery (D.C.M., A.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

2021 Oct 15

Heterologous SARS-CoV-2 Booster Vaccinations – Preliminary Report.

Authors: Atmar RL,….. El Sahly HM…

EPub 2021 Sept 22
Efficacy of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine at Completion of Blinded Phase.

El Sahly HM, … COVE Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4….. Epub 2021 Sep 22….

PubMed lists: COVE Study Group [Corporate Author]

COVE STUDY GROUP:

Hana M. El Sahly, MD is principal investigator for Baylor and under her is listed
Jennifer A. Whitaker, C. Mary Healy, Christine Akamine, Wendy A Keitel, Robert L Atmar, Annette Nagel, Sandra Francisco, Thea Marie Cordero, Janet Brown, Jennifer Christensen, Caroline Doughty-Skierski, Connie Rangel, Carrie Kibler, Coni Cheesman, Lisreina Toro, Chanei Henry, Chianti Wade Bowers, Pedro Piedra, Kathy Bosworth, Kayla Burrell, Jesus Banay, Tykel Eddy, Trent Davis, Shetel Anassi, Yvette Rugeley, Olga Rybina-Willis
…..

So what about the OTHER 15 on the ‘Advisory Board’ I checked, none are in the COVE study group.

….

And one last Baylor – Atmar paper:

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination During Pregnancy: A Complex Decision.

Wang EW, Parchem JG, Atmar RL, Clark EH.Open Forum Infect Dis.

2021 Apr 10

Abstract
As the first severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines passed UK and US regulatory milestones in late 2020 and early 2021, multiple professional societies offered recommendations to assist pregnant and breastfeeding people as they choose whether to undergo vaccination. Despite such guidance, the lack of data describing vaccine safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy in pregnant and breastfeeding people has made this decision challenging for many. However, even considering the paucity of data, the known risks of coronavirus disease 2019 during pregnancy likely outweigh the not yet fully elucidated risks of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, which have reassuring safety and efficacy profiles among nonpregnant people.

The Chair of the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee is so compromised she should NEVER have been anywhere near the approval process!

-GC

Summary

After viewing the tape of Dr. Peter McCullough on Stew Peters, I’m both shocked and disappointed that Baylor (IMO both the College of Medicine and the allied University) would do anything except DEFEND Dr. McCullough for simply speaking TRUTH when nobody else dared to say it.

At a time when all of social media was defending what now amounts to SCIENTIFIC ERROR, Baylor – a renowned institution – accused a TRUTH-TELLER of “misinformation” for being on the cutting edge.

To borrow from Trump…… “SAD!”

We know now that everything Dr. Peter McCullough said was not only true, but that the science he cited was LEADING EDGE – pointing in the direction of future findings.

It is not “misinformation” to state scientific and medical findings which are both TRUE and in the process of CHANGING narratives. That IS what science is supposed to do.

China won’t have to fire a SHOT to steal academic leadership from the United States, if Baylor – in TEXAS of all places – is going to hand them scientific superiority on a silver platter.

Get the politics and the self-dealing OUT OF YOUR SCIENCE, BAYLOR.

It is a TRAVESTY for you, Baylor, to let your “big money scientists” force out your TRUTH-TELLERS based on POLITICS and motivated by their own SCIENTIFIC MISJUDGMENTS.

W

**A Book of Some Importance to Baptists**

Who Approved and Upheld These Vaccines? The Covid Second Opinion Forum Held by Ron Johnson vs. the FDA Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC)

A background research post by Gail Combs

PREFACE

by Wolf Moon

It is useful for me to explain Gail’s post – to help you understand the importance of it.

People in government regulation of science and medicine do not make decisions in a vacuum – but they may make their decisions in an artificial atmosphere which is created, composed, and altered by those with the extreme power and ability to CONTROL INFORMATION.

LancetGate was very demonstrative of this ability to control science and medicine.

After watching a variety of FDA decisions under the Trump and Biden administrations, it has become very clear to me that FDA resides in a political and economic crosswinds, highly influenced by many parties with strong expectations and abilities to influence. And yet, the shocking (but welcome) advisory recommendation AGAINST COVID vaccine boosters – then overridden by the political operative Rochelle ~~Alinsky~~ Walensky in CDC – shows how a coordinated injection of honest medicine and common sense into FDA decision-making (THANK YOU, Steve Kirsch!) can sometimes make its case heard – even if only momentarily.

Sadly, it seems to me that Pfizer is back in the driver’s seat again. We thus have to ask WHY.

What Gail has done is to look at one endpoint of the argument (frontline doctors and publishing scientists who have run into the problems), which leads to the other, where we begin to find the reasons why FDA generally decides things in favor of big industry and big government, and not to the benefit of individual patients and doctors.

By looking at the doctors and scientists who supported logical and ethical TREATMENT of COVID-19, and who were wrongly and unethically BLOCKED and DENIED PERMISSION at every point – we can see that undue industry and political influence in NIH, CDC, and FDA are most likely responsible for decisions that make absolutely no sense to truly independent scientists and doctors. The video Gail includes is rather astounding in terms of showing us how much went wrong. What we are now seeing reminds me of science and medicine in the Soviet Union. Absolutely incredible.

What Gail has done here is to “follow the influence” – to show that FDA decision-making has NOT been in a vacuum, precisely because the members of the FDA advisory committee are not truly independent, but are in fact actors for the very same powerful forces that benefit from FDA decisions which are now inscrutable at the doctor-patient frontline.

Perhaps even more astoundingly, the very SYSTEM of NIH, FDA, and CDC seems to be designed, at this point, to leave NOBODY ACCOUNTABLE. Advisory groups and even department responsibilities are created, rearranged, and dismissed, so that NOBODY takes responsibility for mandates that defy logic and even violate the common medical sense of the past.

If something goes wrong in this chaotic system of responsibilities in the wrong places, you either blame everybody or nobody at all. This is why, in my opinion, the entire federal governent had to get rid of Trump.

DIG ALONG WITH GAIL, as she finds the CLUES – first in the testimony of Ron Johnson’s witnesses – then in the backgrounds of members of an important FDA advisory panel.

With that, here’s Gail.

The Covid Second Opinion Forum

It would be nice to let Senator Johnson know we saw this:

CONTACT: https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/contact

Offices – Mail address and Phone: https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/office_locations

MANY THANKS TO GA/FL and Wolf M00n for alerting us to the Covid 2nd opinion Forum

Here’s a must watch – A SECOND OPINION – SENATOR RON JOHNSON FORUM.
Begins at 40:19 – https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html
“Discussion begins around 40 minute mark. Sen. Ron Johnson moderates a panel discussion, COVID-19: A Second Opinion. A group of world renowned doctors and medical experts provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.”
More at https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov
GA/FL

It is five hours long and I went through the whole video. I recommend listening to it as you work on other things since there is not much to watch. It is much better than the speeches at the March Against Mandates.

My, comments posted 1/25/2020:
1:41:50 – 1:50:00 Dr Paul Marik on Remdesivir:
4 million hospitalized 850,000 million died. He says cheap approved drugs could have save 500,000 lives (That is the 1/2 million again that I figured out by a different method.)
He eviscerated NIH/FAUCI.

Fauci Told POTUS Remdesivir was good 10 days in. Researchers Changed the study END POINT to HIDE DEATHS. The OTHER study SHOWING the deaths/toxicity of Remdesivir in Ebola trial was released at 11:00 am JUST before the Afternoon presentation of the corrupted Remdesivir-Covid study that was presented by Fauci to POTUS. (More on this below) He also mentioned U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services gives bonuses to hospital to treat MEDICARE (the old and ‘useless’) patients with this toxic drug.

Steve Kirsch made it clear he thought it was corruption and worse several times.

Incriminating evidence – Steve Kirsch’s newsletter
New VAERS analysis reveals hundreds of serious adverse Events that the CDC and EDA Never Told Us About

3:12:00 MyFreeDoctor (dot)com:
This group treated 150,000 and only lost four.

3:35:00 Dr Peter McCollough talks about vaccines:
Originally there were three different advisory boards during the trials but when it came to the EUA those boards were gotten rid of AND THAT IS WHY CLOT SHOT WAS NOT PULLED IN JANUARY 2021!
Steven Kirsch says right after that there is HARD evidence at least 4 in the CDC/FDA were getting royalties…

4:02:00
The risk increases with each shot. mRna was ENGINEERED to TAMP DOWN RESPONSE to evade ADE BUT it looks like it ALSO tamps down response to viruses, bacteria, and cancer.
New Study Dr Voss out of the Netherlands.
There are too many Dr Voss in the netherlands for me to hunt down the correct one.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=voss%20netherlands&sort=date
(Could be KL Koss since she has papers about the heart and colon and cancer. papers: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Koss+KL&cauthor_id=8943944

4:43:00 Attorney Tom Renz:

He has Dept of Defense Whistleblowers with the data from the D-Med data base. They have taken data ‘snapshots’ over time and it shows THE DATA BASE WAS TAMPERED WITH TO HIDE THE INJURIES TO OUR SOLDIERS!
Senator Johnson Ordered PRESERVE YOUR RECORDS….

January 25, 2022 14:52
Apparently Daniel Horowitz chased down Attorney after the Ron Johonson Senate Hearing for some additional clarifications.
https://thelibertydaily.com/bombshell-cover-up-cancer-diagnoses-in-the-military-rose-over-three-fold-since-jabs-were-introduced/
para59r

5:05:00
Myocarditis and heart Hits 18 to 24 yr old males the worst. up to 50 years 21,000 cases so far.
A lot more good info.

Dr. Christina Parks made comments through out the presentation.

January 25, 2022 20:09
Yes – Dr. Christina Parks has made some excellent points about how differently people with African genetic background react to CV19 AND THE VACCINES.
Ethnicity does matter in medicine – my sister had concurrent dengue fever and malaria and her response was severe and peculiar to a certain ethnicity so….we learned may have some middle eastern/african blood somewhere previously unknown to us.
GA/FL

The Timeline of FDA Decisions

Heading down the Rabbit Hole on Vaccines that Dr Peter McCollough opened.

Emergency Use Authorization — FDA
As background, this gives the laws, who has the authority and the timeline.

TIME LINE:

October 13, 1976 – New York Times:
Swine Flu Program Is Halted in 9 States As 3 Die After Shots
“After the deaths, swine flu vaccinations were halted throughout Allegheny County, which includes Pittsburgh, and the Federal Center for Disease Control sent doctors to investigate….“

September 1, 2020 CNN
Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a Covid-19 vaccine now would be ‘colossally stupid’
This is actually a very good article on BAD vaccines and what it can do to the public’s trust.

And then we come to the FDA, the meetings and WHO is on the board.

October 22, 2020
Discussing, in general, the development, authorization and/or licensure of vaccines to prevent COVID-19

On October 22, 2020, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s (CBER), Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) will meet in open session, to discuss, in general, the development, authorization and/or licensure of vaccines to prevent COVID-19.
FDA

Those are probably the three boards Dr Peter McCollough talks about. The third was the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee that hold these meetings. Note they are meeting just before the election and it contains ALL three boards.
….

These meetings are AFTER the STOLEN ELECTION but again all three advisory boards are present.

December 10, 2020
Discussing First Emergency Use Authorization Request for a COVID-19 Vaccine

On December 10, 2020, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s (CBER), Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) will meet in open session to discuss Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age and older.
FDA

December 17,2020

Discussing Second Emergency Use Authorization Request for a COVID-19 Vaccine

Agenda
The meeting presentations will be heard, viewed, captioned, and recorded through an online teleconferencing platform. On December 17, 2020, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s (CBER), Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) will meet in open session to discuss Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Moderna, Inc., COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 18 years and older.
FDA

December 15, 2020 updated December 18

The ACIP met last week to review the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and recommended moving forward with its distribution to anyone over age 16. The FDA issued an EUA on Saturday following the meeting and notified the CDC and Operation Warp Speed to coordinate distribution plans. Initial doses were shipped over the weekend. The first round of deliveries will be completed in all 50 states this week…
Pfizer’s initial distribution of vaccines will be given to 21 million health care workers and 3 million mostly elderly people living in long-term care facilities.
As vaccines are deployed, data on potential or delayed side effects will be collected to answer questions that would have been addressed in long-term trials with millions of participants under nonemergency circumstances….
Nat’l Conf. of State Legislators

December 14, 2020, 8:33 PM – Black nurse in New York, Sandra Lindsay, gets the first vaccine.

A month later we get the first Adverse Reaction Reports.
January 18, 2021 – Coronavirus: California calls for pause, investigation after Allergic Reactions to Moderna Vaccine

Biden is installed in the White House and the FDA/CDC does no real investigation. Instead NOTE THE CHANGE IN MEETING MINUTES.

February 26, 2021
Discussing Third Emergency Use Authorization Request for a COVID-19 Vaccine

Agenda
The meeting presentations will be heard, viewed, captioned, and recorded through an online teleconferencing platform. The committee will meet in open session to discuss EUA of the Janssen Biotech Inc. COVID-19 Vaccine for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 18 years and older. <== NO ADDITIONAL ADVISORY BOARDS!
Meeting Materials
FDA intends to make background material available to the public no later than 2 business days before the meeting. <== THIS IS THE INFORMATION people are having to SUE FOR!
FDA

Note there are NO MEETINGS TO DISCUSS DEATHS OR ADVERSE REACTIONS! This is the NEXT MEETING:

June 10, 2021

Discussing Pediatric Use of COVID-19 Vaccines

The Committee will meet in open session to discuss, in general, data needed to support authorization and/or licensure of COVID-19 vaccines for use in pediatric populations.
Meeting Materials
FDA intends to make background material available to the public no later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post the background material on its website prior to the meeting….
FDA

Now we come to the meat, exactly who is at those meetings?

The VRBPAC Advisory Committee

The Committee reviews and evaluates data concerning the safety, effectiveness, and appropriate use of vaccines and related biological products which are intended for use in the prevention, treatment, or diagnosis of human diseases, and, as required, any other products for which the Food and Drug Administration has regulatory responsibility. The Committee also considers the quality and relevance of FDA’s research program which provides scientific support for the regulation of these products and makes appropriate recommendations to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
The Committee shall consist of a core of 15 voting members including the Chair. Members and the Chair are selected by the Commissioner or designee from among authorities knowledgeable in the fields of immunology, molecular biology, rDNA, virology; bacteriology, epidemiology or biostatistics, vaccine policy, vaccine safety science, federal immunization activities, vaccine development including translational and clinical evaluation programs, allergy, preventive medicine, infectious diseases, pediatrics, microbiology, and biochemistry.
FDA

Applying for Membership on FDA Advisory Committees

As part of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) ongoing efforts to recruit qualified experts with minimal conflicts of interest who are interested in serving on FDA advisory committees, FDA is requesting nominations for members to serve on its advisory committees….
Conflicts of Interest:
Potential candidates are asked to provide detailed information concerning such matters as financial holdings, employment, and research grants and/or contracts in order to permit evaluation of possible sources of conflict of interest.
FDA

Oooh Boy, they do not sound good. I am digging up and placing here a lot of info on each individual. However I have screened out much much more. What struck me, is out of the sixteen only three do not have major expertise in pediatrics. ALL have ties to NIH/Fauxi or the FDA or the CDC. Some have ties to drug companies and more than one has ties to China. Most are women and three are foreign educated and probably not American born. Out of over 300 million people, you would think they could find Americans.

First a cameo of each of the players, and then if you wish you can look at some of the other information I dug out. If you click on the name it takes you to the information they provided to the FDA, often pages and pages citing the papers they wrote and who they worked for. This is the information I used with some added from other sources.

CAMEOS

DIRECTOR
Prabhakara Atreya, Female connected to Fauci She has no FDA bio.

Ph.D. biochemistry Memorial University of Newfoundland, in Canada 1987

Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 1989 – 1990 (messing with fiber cell membranes of frog, chick, bovine, rabbit and human lenses)

Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY – Papers 1990 &1995

FDA since 2010 per BIO but actually a paper shows she was working @ FDA in 1999.

NIH paper shows she was at NIH in 1998
Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY – Papers 1990 &1995 (Only 13 papers found)

…..

Chair
Hana El Sahly, M.D.
Baylor College of Medicine (Woman)

Wrote paper on Remdesivir used by Fauci to trick President Trump. The one referred to by DR. McCullough

…..

Paula Annunziato, M.D. ***
Vice President and Therapeutic Area HeadVaccines Clinical ResearchMerck

Seems to specialize in Pediatric Vaccines.

Archana Chatterjee, M.D., Ph.D.
Dean Chicago Medical School (Woman)

specialises Pediatrics Vaccines

Pune University, Maharashtra, India 1979-1983

Army Medical Corps, Military Hospital, Gaya, India, 1985 -1988

She is nationally recognized for her work in vaccine development for human papilloma viruses – think Gardasil. I wonder how well acquainted she is with Gregg Sylvester, below & Bill Gates? – Controversial vaccine studies: Gates and Infertility

…….

CAPT Amanda Cohn, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatrics, Vaccines

Chief Medical Officer – National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases – CDC
The mission of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) is the prevention of disease, disability, and death through immunization

59 Scientific papers: many authored with Nancy E Messonnier

Time to check the Atlantia graveyards… And I am NOT kidding.

…..

Hayley Gans, M.D. (woman)
Expertise: Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases
Department of Pediatrics
Stanford University Medical Center

Author with a bunch of Chinese with FUNDING from China, using the bogus PCR test to say people who have recovered can catch Covid again and re-infect others. This is WHY natural immunity was never on the table and vaccines were.

….

Holly Janes, Ph.D.
Expertise: Biostatistics
Professor – Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division
Division of Public Health Sciences – Seattle, WA

Holly is a biostatistician working on the design and analysis of vaccine studies, with a particular expertise in HIV prevention and vaccine science. Worked for NIH and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

…..

Michael Kurilla, M.D., Ph.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases, Pathology
Director, Division of Clinical Innovation National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences
National Institutes of Health (NIH <– He works for Fauci)
Bethesda, MD 20852

….

Myron Levine, M.D., D.T.P.H., F.A.A.P

Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Associate Dean for Global Health – Vaccinology and Infectious Diseases

Center for Vaccine Development – University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore, MD

Faculty at CVD have served in critical leadership roles in U.S. and international research and policy efforts. For example, Neuzil co-chaired the COVID-19 Prevention Trials Network, a research network established by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [ Dr. Fauci was appointed director of NIAID in 1984.] in response to the pandemic. Vaccine research at CVD continues, with an emphasis on reaching the populations most impacted by COVID-19 and testing pediatric vaccines.
University of Maryland

….

H. Cody Meissner, M.D. (Male)
Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics – Tufts University School of Medicine
Director, Pediatric Infectious Disease

H. Cody Meissner, MD, is a leading national expert on childhood vaccinations who consults with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on periodic updates to the recommended immunization schedule for newborns through 18-year-olds. At Tufts Children’s Hospital at Tufts Medical Center he heads the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases…
H. Cody Meissner, MD, Vice Chair (’19)
H. Cody Meissner, MD | Tufts Medical Center

…..

Paul Offit, M.D.

Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

Paul A. Offit, MD is the Director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia as well as the Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology and a Professor of Pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a recipient of many awards including the J. Edmund Bradley Prize for Excellence in Pediatrics from the University of Maryland Medical School, the Young Investigator Award in Vaccine Development from the Infectious Disease Society of America, and a Research Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Offit has published more than 160 papers in medical and scientific journals in the areas of rotavirus-specific immune responses and vaccine safety….
FDA

In 2017, Dr. Offit was a weekly columnist for The Daily Beast.

A look at his recent peer-reviewed papers shows he is targeting vaccine hesitant parents.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Offit+PA&cauthor_id=24011750&size=20

This says it all:

Plotkin SA, Offit PA, Reiss D.: Important New Resource for Clinicians Giving Expert Witness Testimony on Vaccines. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 37(12), Dec. 2018.

To the Editors:

Vaccination is under attack by individuals who occasionally use the legal system to oppose mandatory vaccination laws and in some cases to obtain exemptions for particular children whose parents are opposed to vaccination. During the legal proceedings, as we have witnessed, experts testifying in favor of vaccination may be challenged with references from journals of doubtful quality that oppose vaccination.
To provide important references that discuss and disprove claims made against vaccines, the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia has created a library of references addressing certain safety issues that may be useful as an aid and refresher to clinicians giving expert testimony on the safety of vaccines and to lawyers defending vaccination of children.
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia legal library may be entered through the web address vaccine.chop.edu/safety-references.
We would be grateful if you could inform your colleagues about the availability of this resource, which should be of great value for experts testifying for vaccination and for clinicians who need to convince parents about vaccine safety. https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Fulltext/2018/12000/Important_New_Resource_for_Clinicians_Giving.42.aspx
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

………..

Steven Pergam, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Medical Director
Infection Prevention
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance — Seattle, WA

He seems to specialize in cancer and immuno-compromised and seems to be the best of a bad bunch, until you see he is tied at the hip to NIH & CDC from 2009 to present as well as to various drug companies.

….

Jay Portnoy, M.D.

Expertise: Consumer Representative (This is the guy representing the public)

Professor of Pediatrics

Medical Director of Telemedicine Section of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, MO

150 papers mainly on allergies. American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology – “…a professional medical association of more than 6,000 allergist-immunologists and allied health professionals…” AND if you search long enough…. You find the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology wrote an Article urging allergists to support more funding for NIH (Fauci)

He is also on a Task Force Paper recommending those with severe egg allergies to go ahead and get the Flu vaccine, just do it at the allergist because “… personnel to recognize and equipment to treat anaphylaxis need to be immediately available…”

….

Andrea Shane, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc.

Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics, Director Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases – Emory University School of Medicine – Atlanta, GA

International exchange fellowship, Children’s Hospital at Montefiore and Beijing Children’s Hospital, Beijing, China October-November, 1999

Lieutenant Commander, United States Public Health Service, 2001-2003;

Inactive Reserve Corps (IRC) 2003-until IRC dissolved in 2010.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis working group, appointed member, 2009-until committee dissolved by CDC in 2011.

01 August 2007- 01 August 2016 Co- investigator, NIH/NIAID/DMID Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU)

influenza vaccine to breastfeeding women trial, DMID#09-007;

…..

Paul Spearman, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Director, Division of Infectious Diseases
Albert B. Sabin Chair in Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Professor, Department of Pediatrics
University of Cincinnati School of Medicine Cincinnati, OH

This guy is a really big heavy weight.

There is cross-over with the lady above, Andrea Shane. Any bets he pulled her in to be his ‘female puppet’ – a good little government soldier?

03/2009-09/2016: Vice Chair for Research Department of Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine

03/2009-09/2016: Chief Research Officer Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta, GA

[Andrea Shane is Attending Pediatrician Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Emory Healthcare Grady Health 2006 – present ]

This guy has a full page of COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS, National and International, and a whole section for NIH Councils and Study Sections AND… NIH/NIAID HIV Vaccine Trials Network – Protocol Chair, HVTN 088 Protocol 2010-present

Not to mention his connections to the drug companies and China.

………

Geeta K. Swamy, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Senior Associate Dean Vice Chair for Research & Faculty Development
Associate Professor, ObGyn, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Duke University, Durham, NC

2004 – 2006 Duke University Associate Faculty Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Division of Clinical & Epidemiological Research

2009 – present Duke University Vaccine Trials Unit Investigator Duke Translational Research Institute Durham, NC

Grants from, NIH-NIAID, GlaxoSmithKline, CDC-NCIRD, ACOG/Merck & Company,

2015

Consultative Workshop: Immunology Research Gaps Related to Maternal Immunization – Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

WHO Brighton Collaboration Global Alignment of Immunization Safety Assessment in Pregnancy – Chair, Fetal Distress Working Group

…

Gregg Sylvester, M.D., M.P.H. +
Expertise: Alternate Industry Representative
Vice President – Medical Affairs, Seqirus Inc., Summit, NJ

• Launched Pfizer’s Pediatric and Adult Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine,

Spearheaded science-based rationale to preserve Pfizer’s Prevnar 13 infant schedule in US recommendations

• Launched Merck’s HPV4 vaccine in over 100 countries

• Partnered with community organizations in Delaware to reduce infant mortality, teen pregnancy rates and HIV rates

Created the medical affairs strategy for Merck’s HPV4 vaccine, Gardasil

….

Vaccine Approval For Children

Now, if you have time & stomach, a deeper dive into the people who unleashed the Clot Shot on babies.

DIRECTOR
Prabhakara Atreya, Ph.D.
Division of Scientific Advisors & Consultants
Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research
Food and Drug Administration – Silver Spring, MD

Dr. Prabhakara Atreya, an Indian American scientist is a 10 year veteran at the US Food and Drug Administration which she joined in 2010. Prior to this appointment, Atreya worked at the National Institutes of Health, leading the Office of Scientific Review. She has a PhD in biochemistry, biophysics and molecular biology from the Memorial University of Newfoundland, in Canada. She was one of the team of US regulators and independent experts of Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC). At the time of emergency use authorization for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, she was the Acting Designated Federal Officer of VRBPAC.
LINKED-IN

Thesis:
Atreya, Prabhakara Lakshmi (1987) Conformational aspects of proline hydroxylation in collagen biosynthesis : studies with synthetic peptides. Doctoral (PhD) thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Probable Papers (13):
Affiliation: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington
I think this paper is what Fauci Spotted:
Construction of in-frame chimeric plant viral genes by simplified PCR strategies.
Atreya CD, Atreya PL, Pirone TP. Plant Mol Biol. 1992 Jun;19

Site-directed mutations in the potyvirus HC-Pro gene affect helper component activity, virus accumulation, and symptom expression in infected tobacco plants.
Atreya CD, Atreya PL, Thornbury DW, Pirone TP.Virology. 1992 Nov

Mutational analysis of the coat protein N-terminal amino acids involved in potyvirus transmission by aphids.
Atreya PL, Lopez-Moya JJ, Chu M, Atreya CD, Pirone TP.J Gen Virol. 1995 Feb;76
…
Her papers then show a move to NIH
Affiliation: Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0720, USA.
The NS1 protein of human respiratory syncytial virus is a potent inhibitor of minigenome transcription and RNA replication.
Atreya PL, Peeples ME, Collins PL.J Virol. 1998 Feb;

And then the move to FDA.
Affiliation: Laboratory of Pediatric and Respiratory Viral Diseases, DVP/CBER, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Respiratory syncytial virus strain A2 is resistant to the antiviral effects of type I interferons and human MxA.
Atreya PL, Kulkarni S.Virology. 1999 Sep 1; (@ FDA)

Role of type I IFNs in the in vitro attenuation of live, temperature-sensitive vaccine strains of human respiratory syncytial virus.
Loveys DA, Kulkarni S, Atreya PL.Virology. 2000 Jun

……..
Her resume STINKS! She has three papers on human respiratory syncytial virus, and a bunch of early papers on cloning and tinkering with plants @ Univ Kentucky and earlier papers messing with fiber cell membranes of frog, chick, bovine, rabbit and human eye lenses @ Wayne State Univ, MI NOTHING ELSE except the Sex Card, Race Card and probably not American born.
……..

These are her picks:

CHAIR:
Hana El Sahly, M.D.
Baylor College of Medicine
May 18, 2020
Hana El Sahly on Remdesivir and the NIH’s Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (Well that answers WHO set up elders for DEATH!)

On May 15, Texas Monthly reported on their conversation with Dr. Hana El Sahly of Houston’s Baylor College of Medicine. In the coming days, she will begin registering hospitalized participants at Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center and Ben Taub Hospital for the second phase of the National Institutes of Health’s Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial, or ACTT. She’s Baylor’s lead investigator for participation in the program, which in its first phase analyzed a randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the investigational antiviral remdesivir. Preliminary findings suggested that patients treated with remdesivir recovered faster than patients who received a placebo, which led to the May 1 announcement that remdesivir would be the first medication to receive FDA authorization for emergency use for COVID-19.
“We found that for patients who have COVID-19 pneumonia bad enough to get them to the hospital, treatment with remdesivir expedites the time to recovery by an average of four days per patient,” says El Sahly…
Hana El Sahly, M.D.

Education

Undergraduate education American University of Beirut, Lebannon Bachelor of Science, 1987-1990Medical education American University of Beirut, Lebannon School of Medicine, Doctor of Medicine, 1990-1994

Scientific Papers (46)

Several presentations on “HIV vaccines”
Fauci must love her:

Review Panels, Committees
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health-sponsored vaccine clinical trial 05-0011; 2006
Reviewer, Loan Repayment Program, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health; 2008
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health-sponsored vaccine clinical trial 08-0009; 2009
Reviewer, Scientific Review Program, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; 2010
Member, Data Safety Monitoring Board, Protein Sciences Corporation vaccine clinical trial PSC-22; 2010
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health–sponsored study DMID 10-0043; 2011
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health-sponsored study DMID 11-0007; 2011
Reviewer, Scientific Review Program, National Institutes of Health, P01 application “Towards A Universal Influenza Vaccine”; 2012
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health sponsored study DMID 13-0087; 2014
Member, Publications Committee, Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2014-2017
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, Mercia Pharma Inc-sponsored study NOVA MAS-1; 2015
Member of the Food and Drug Administration Vaccine and Related Biological Advisory Committee; 2016–
Reviewer, Influenza pre-applications, US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command-Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, 2016
WHAT THE HECK IS THIS!! => Member, ID week program planning committee, 2017-2019

Is this her daughter: Dr. Hana Mohammed Elsahly, MD 28, practicing in Houston, TX?
……

Paula Annunziato, M.D. ***
Vice President and Therapeutic Area Head
Vaccines Clinical Research
Merck
Seems to specialize in Pediatric Vaccines.
Nuv said…

…..

Archana Chatterjee, M.D., Ph.D.
Dean Chicago Medical School
Vice President for Medical Affairs
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
M.B.B.S. (Equivalent to M.D.): Pune University, Maharashtra, India 1979-1983
Army Medical Corps, Military Hospital, Gaya, India, 1985 -1988
Major Scientific Interest: Vaccine development. She forgets to mention her main trial target is infants.

Principal Investigator: Recent Research Projects/Grants
GSK = GlaxoSmithKlinePled Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations & Failure to Report Safety Data – July 2012
(Nice people she worked for.)

Date: 2018-2019 Sponsor: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration For Community Living

Date: 2018-2020 Sponsor: Pfizer A Phase 2, Randomized,Trial ….Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Infants.

Date: 2018-2020 Sponsor: GSK …Study to Assess the Safety & Immunogenicity of Meningococcal Vaccine & 1 Pneumococcal Vaccine when Administered Concomitantly with Routine Vaccines to Healthy Infants.

Date: 2018-2020 Sponsor: GSK … dose-escalation study to evaluate safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals’ respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) investigational vaccine based on the RSV viral proteins F, N and M2-1 encoded by chimpanzee-derived adenovector.. when administered… to RSVseropositive infants aged 12 to 23 months.

Date: 2017-2019 Sponsor: MedImmune ….Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MED18897, a Monoclonal Antibody With an Extended Half-life Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus, in Healthy Preterm Infants. [Are they going to give the infants the RSV?]

Date: 10/2015-10/2017 Sponsor: Merck…, Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Different Formulations of V114 [15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine ] in Healthy Adults and Infants.

Date: 10/2015-10/2016 Sponsor: Astra Zeneca An observational study of RSV hospitalization in preterm infants.

Date: 9/2014-2017 Sponsor: GSK … multinational study … of GSK Biologicals’ MMR vaccine (209762)… compared to Merck (M-M-R®II or VaxPro), as a first dose, both co-administered with Varivax, Havrix (all subjects) and Prevnar 13 (US subset) in healthy children 12 to 15 months of age.

Peer-Reviewed Articles (120)

Appointments:
2020 – Invited to serve on NIH (NCI) Special Emphasis Panel to evaluate grant applications received in response to the RFA(s) with primary focus on HIV-Associated Malignancy Research

2019 to present – Invited to serve as and appointed a member on the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) of the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)

2012 -2019 – Consultant to the US FDA

2014 – Merck Vision 2027 Expert Input Forum on Vaccine Policy

2008 – 2012 – Member, Anti Infective Drug Advisory Committee (AIDAC), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US FDA

2008 -2012 – Invited to serve on the National Vaccine Advisory Boards for Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis Pharmaceutical Companies

2008– Merck Vaccination Service Award, recognition of commitment to improving public health through vaccination.

2006 – Invited member, Sanofi-Pasteur, MedImmune, Abbott Pharmaceutical Companies’ National Advisory Boards

2003 – Invited Session Chair at an International Symposium organized by the Merieux Foundation entitled, “Vaccination in Tomorrow’s Society – New Information Pathways”. Annecy, France

Merieux Foundation …. AND THAT GETS INTERESTING…. WIKI

In October 2004, the FM was the beneficiary of a Franco-Chinese agreement that led to the creation of the Institut Pasteur de Shanghai.…
In 2012, the FM continued its partnership with the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
In 2015, the CAMS-FM partnership founded the Christophe Mérieux Laboratory (CML) at the Institute of Pathogen Biology in Beijing to focus on the study pneumonia and tuberculosis. Researchers at the CML “benefit from and training modules developed by the Emerging Pathogens Laboratory in Lyon”,[5][6] a BSL-4 lab which was also built by the FM in 1999 and since 2005 is now operated by INSERM.[7]
In 2015, the FM participated in the donation by the French government of CIRI’s Biosafety Level 4 expertise to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
In January 2017, a researcher who was financed by the CAMS-FM partnership participated in a study of human rhinovirus and genotype A21…..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fondation_M%C3%A9rieux
WIKI

“Mentorship and sponsorship of faculty and learners has been a hallmark of Dr. Chatterjee’s entire thirty- year career in academic medicine…” LINK [I am sure she has been kissing FauXi’s ass for years to get funding.]
MORE:

….Board certified in general pediatrics and pediatric infectious diseases, she is nationally recognized for her work in vaccine development for human papilloma viruses and in antibiotic resistance. She has completed more than 100 clinical trials and published more than 50 peer-reviewed articles, 23 invited review articles, 17 book chapters and one book.
The first woman and person of color to serve as dean of CMS, Dr. Chatterjee, a native of India, earned her medical degree from the Armed Forces Medical College at Pune University in India and her PhD from the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) in Omaha….
https://www.rosalindfranklin.edu/news/rfu-announces-selection-of-new-dean-for-chicago-medical-school/

…..

CAPT Amanda Cohn, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatrics, Vaccines
Chief Medical Officer
National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) MISSION | CDC
The mission of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) is the prevention of disease, disability, and death through immunization and by control of respiratory and related diseases.
CDC

POSTGRADUATE TRAINING 2004 – 2006 Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC, Atlanta, GA
WORK EXPERIENCE :
3/2019-present Chief Medical Officer (Acting), Vaccine Policy, Preparedness, and Global Health, Office of the Director, NCIRD, CDC
11/2015-present Executive Secretary, ACIP and Senior Advisor, Vaccines Office of the Director, NCIRD, CDC
5/2014-11/2015 Deputy Division Director, Immunization Services Division, NCIRD, CDC
01/2013-05/2014 Acting Epidemiology Team Lead Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases, DBD, NCIRD, OD
06/2006-12/2012 Medical Officer, Epidemiology Team Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Division of Bacterial Disease, NCIRD, CDC
07/2004-06/2006 Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) Officer, Epidemiology Program Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA Assigned to: Bacterial Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, National Immunization Program

Scientific papers: 59 many authored with Nancy E Messonnier
Great titles like:

Multistate Outbreak of Respiratory Infections Among Unaccompanied Children, June 2014-July 2014.
Conclusions: This respiratory disease outbreak was due to multiple pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 5 and influenza viruses. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations prevented further transmission. Future efforts to prevent similar outbreaks will benefit from use of both vaccines. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27001799/
[How about CLOSING THE DARN BORDERS!]
Understanding Factors Affecting University A Students’ Decision to Receive an Unlicensed Serogroup B Meningococcal Vaccine.
Compliance with recommendations and opportunities for vaccination at ages 11 to 12 years: evaluation of the 2009 national immunization survey-teen.
Adolescent immunizations and other clinical preventive services: a needle and a hook?
Immunizations in the United States: a rite of passage.
Attitudes, practices, and preferences of pediatricians regarding initiation of hepatitis B immunization at birth.
……

Hayley Gans, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases
Professor of Pediatrics
Department of Pediatrics
Stanford University Medical Center

Fellowship: Stanford University School of Medicine (1998) CA

Medical Education: State University of New York Syracuse Medical School Registrar (1991) NY
Board Certification: American Board of Pediatrics, Pediatric Infectious Diseases (1999)
Residency: Stanford University Medical Center (1994) CA
Internship: Stanford University Medical Center (1992) CA
M.D., SUNY at Syracuse, Medicine (1991)

Fellowship Program Director, Pediatric Infectious Diseases (2006 – 2017)

Co-director, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Program for Immunocompromised Hosts, Children’s Hospital at Stanford (2013 – Present)
Associate Fellowship Director, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Stanford University Medical Center (2017 – Present)
Director, Fellowship Education, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Medical Center (2017 – Present)

Sort of BLAAaaaah until you look at this paper:

Remember her focus is kids.

July 2020 Lancet preprint.
Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Positivity of Infected and Recovered Patients: A Single Center COVID-19 Experience and Potential Implications https://autopapers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3605268

Jia Huang – Southern University of Science and Technology CHINA and 42 other authors with only 7 others not Chinese. The other universities were Sichuan University, China and Sanford.

https://autopapers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=4257785

And then it REALLY GETS GOOD:

FUNDING STATEMENT: This work was supported by grants from Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (Jia Huang, No. SZSM201812065); Bill & Melinda Gates Foundations (Lei Liu); and from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Jia Huang, No. 81501651)

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS: The authors declare no competing interests.

ETHICS APPROVAL STATEMENT: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology.[CHINA]

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive detection in infected but recovered individuals has been reported. Patients who have recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could profoundly impact the health care system if a subset were to be polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive again with reactivated SARS-CoV-2. We sought to define the kinetics and relevance of PCR-positive recurrence during recovery from acute COVID-19 to better understand risks for prolonged infectivity and reinfection.

METHODS: A series of COVID-19 414 patients, at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China from January 11 to April 23, 2020. Univariable and multivariable statistical analysis of inpatient data were performed to develop an algorithm to predict patients at risk of recurrence of PCR positivity.
[REMEMBER PCR TESTS RETURN MAJOR FALSE POSITIVES – Reiner Fuellmich say this guy Droston isn’t a Doctor at all, but a bull**** artist. Christian Drosten & the Fraud Behind COVID 19 PCR Testing ]
FINDINGS: 16·7% recovered patients with PCR positive recurring one to three times, despite being in strict quarantine. Younger patients with mild pulmonary respiratory syndrome had higher risk of PCR positivity recurrence. The recurrence prediction model had an area under the ROC curve of 0·786.

INTERPRETATION: This case series provides clinical characteristics of recovered COVID-19 patients with recurrent SARS-CoV-2 positivity, despite strict quarantine, at a 16·7% rate. Use of a recurrence prediction algorithm may identify patients at high risk of recurrent SARS-CoV-2 positivity and help understand reactivation and reinfection possibilities to establish protocols for health policy.
LANCET

This is a very important paper because it REFUTES NATURAL IMMUNITY and green lights MORE DRACONIAN ECONOMY KILLING ‘Health Measures’

……

Holly Janes, Ph.D.
Expertise: Biostatistics
Professor — Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division
Division of Public Health Sciences – Seattle, WA

Dr. Holly Janes is a biostatistician working on the design and analysis of vaccine studies, with a particular expertise in HIV prevention and vaccine science. She also develops and applies statistical methodology for evaluating biomarkers for risk prediction and optimizing treatment decisions

Current Projects

Leadership for the Statistical Data Management Center of the HIV Vaccine Trials Network

Statistical methods for HIV prevention efficacy trials

Statistical methods for human challenge studies

Statistical evaluation of biomarkers for making treatment decisions https://www.fredhutch.org/en/faculty-lab-directory/janes-holly.html

HONORS, AWARDS, SCHOLARSHIPS:

2008 Travel Award, AIDS Vaccine Conference, Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

2000 Cardiovascular Biostatistics Training Grant, National Institutes of Health

EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES:

Associate Editor Journal of the National Cancer Institute (2015-2018)

Diagnostic and Prognostic Research (2016-present)

Statistical Communications in Infectious Diseases (2019-present)

RESEARCH FUNDING:

Active Funding:

2 UM1 AI068635 (PI: Gilbert P) 01/01/2014 – 11/30/2020 5.4 Calendar NIH/NIAID SDMC HIV Vaccine Trials Network

2 R01 CA152089 (PI: Janes H) 07/01/2010 – 11/30/2021 4.8 Calendar

NIH/NCI

Statistical Methods for Evaluating Markers for Treatment Selection

Interventions for disease treatment and prevention can potentially be made more cost-effective by using markers to identify in advance the individuals most likely to benefit from the treatment, and thus avoid treating those unlikely to benefit. [Rationed Health Care anyone?]

Lots more Mostly NIH and then this goodie:

38744 7/1/2006-4/30/2012

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Vaccine Immunology Statistical Center (VISC) The VISC will provide 1) statistical and study design support for pre-clinical vaccine performance trials, 2) centralized data management services for the standardized evaluation of vaccine candidates, 3) development of new statistical methods for cross-species correlates-of-protection analysis.

Role: Faculty Statistician

BIBLIOGRAPHY Publications in Refereed Journals

1. Pepe MS, Janes H, Longton G, Leisenring W, Newcomb P. Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(9):882-90.

2. Janes H, Pepe M, Kooperberg C, Newcomb P. Identifying target populations for screening or not screening using logic regression. Stat Med. 2005;24(9):1321-38.

12. McElrath MJ, De Rosa SC, Moodie Z, Dubey S, Kierstead L, Janes H, Defawe OD, Carter DK, Hural J, Akondy R, Buchbinder SP, Robertson MN, Mehrotra DV, Self SG, Corey L, Shiver JW, Casimiro DR. HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity in the test-of-concept Step study: A casecohort analysis. Lancet. 2008;372(9653):1894-905. PMCID: 2774110.

13. Pepe MS, Feng Z, Janes H, Bossuyt PM, Potter JD. Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: Standards for study design. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(20):1432-8. PMCID: 2567415.

21. Barnabas RV, Wasserheit JN, Huang Y, Janes H, Morrow R, Fuchs J, Mark KE, Casapia M, Mehrotra DV, Buchbinder SP, Corey L. Impact of herpes simplex virus type 2 on HIV-1 acquisition and progression in an HIV vaccine trial (the Step study). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;57(3):238-44. PMCID: 3446850.

22. Fitzgerald DW, Janes H, Robertson M, Coombs R, Frank I, Gilbert P, Loufty M, Mehrotra D, Duerr A. An Ad5-vectored HIV-1 vaccine elicits cell-mediated immunity but does not affect disease progression in HIV-1-infected male subjects: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial (the Step study). J Infect Dis. 2011;203(6):765-72. PMCID: 3119328.

And many more. I am sure Fauci loves her.

……

Michael Kurilla, M.D., Ph.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases, Pathology
Director, Division of Clinical Innovation
National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences
National Institutes of Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) is one of 27 Institutes and Centers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The focus of NCATS is to advance the science of translation, which is the process of turning observations into interventions to improve health.
National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences

……

Myron Levine, M.D., D.T.P.H., F.A.A.P
Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Simon & Bessie Grollman Distinguished Professor
Associate Dean for Global Health
Vaccinology and Infectious Diseases Center for Vaccine Development
University of Maryland School of Medicine

Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health – UMB …

University of Maryland School of Medicine

For more than a year, researchers at the Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health (CVD) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM) have been working tirelessly on COVID-19 research, helping to pave the way for the use of vaccines and therapies that are being administered across the country.
Under the leadership of CVD director Kathleen Neuzil, MD, MPH, FIDSA, the Myron M. Levine, MD, DTPH, Professor in Vaccinology at UMSOM, researchers quickly pivoted decades of vaccine and infectious disease research experience toward combating this deadly virus, which continues to impact millions of people around the world.
Faculty at CVD have served in critical leadership roles in U.S. and international research and policy efforts. For example, Neuzil co-chaired the COVID-19 Prevention Trials Network, a research network established by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID Dr. Fauciwas appointed director of NIAID in 1984.] in response to the pandemic. Vaccine research at CVD continues, with an emphasis on reaching the populations most impacted by COVID-19 and testing pediatric vaccines.
CVD experts have launched an expansive grassroots campaign to educate the community and reach those who have been hit the hardest by this terrible virus, including members of the Black and Brown communities, the elderly, and those with underlying health risks.
“Our CVD team has worked tirelessly and meticulously to advance COVID-19 vaccines and to ensure they are reaching the most affected populations,” Neuzil said. “Our work continues as we begin testing vaccines in children and investigate booster vaccines to address the risk of COVID-19 variants.” [Like this Dude is neutral?]

Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health (CVD …

Our research, surveillance and vaccine development focuses on four key areas: Enteric Diseases, Malaria, Influenza and Respiratory Diseases, and Emerging Pathogens.
Overview
Our faculty and staff are experts in the field of global health and vaccinology, and they are dedicated to improving global health by conducting innovative, world-leading research in Baltimore and around the world. Our key mission is to harness the power of vaccines to prevent disease and save lives in the most vulnerable populations.

…….

H. Cody Meissner, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Professor of Pediatrics
Tufts University School of Medicine
Director, Pediatric Infectious Disease
Tufts Medical Center
POST GRADUATE TRAINING

1973 – 1975 Internship and Residency Boston Floating Hospital New England Medical Center Boston, MA

1975 – 1977 Research Associate Public Health Service National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institute (NICHD) Bethesda, MD Parent Agency is National Institutes of Health (Fauci)

2008 – Present Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

2010 – Present Massachusetts Vaccine Purchasing Advisory Council

2017 – Present National Vaccine Advisory Committee, United States Department of Health and Human Services

2017 – Present Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, United States Department of Health and Human Services

AWARDS

Massachusetts 2017 Recipient of the CDC Childhood Immunization Award

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Striking a Balance Between Individual Rights and Community Benefit.

Meissner HC, Nair N, Plotkin SA. JAMA. 2019 Jan 29

The Importance of MMR Immunization in the United States.

Perrone O, Meissner HC. Pediatrics. 2020 Aug

Principles of Vaccine Licensure, Approval, and Recommendations for Use.

Pickering LK, Meissner HC, Orenstein WA, Cohn AC. Mayo Clin Proc. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

H. Cody Meissner, MD | Tufts Medical Center

H. Cody Meissner, MD, is a leading national expert on childhood vaccinations who consults with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on periodic updates to the recommended immunization schedule for newborns through 18-year-olds. At Tufts Children’s Hospital at Tufts Medical Center he heads the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases

….

Paul Offit, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Professor of Pediatrics
Division of Infectious Diseases
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

Paul A. Offit, MD is the Director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia as well as the Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology and a Professor of Pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a recipient of many awards including the J. Edmund Bradley Prize for Excellence in Pediatrics from the University of Maryland Medical School, the Young Investigator Award in Vaccine Development from the Infectious Disease Society of America, and a Research Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Offit has published more than 160 papers in medical and scientific journals in the areas of rotavirus-specific immune responses and vaccine safety. He is also the coinventor of the rotavirus vaccine, RotaTeq, recommended for universal use in infants by the CDC….
FDA

In 2017, Dr. Offit was a weekly columnist for The Daily Beast.

Papers:

2018

Plotkin, S.A., P.A. Offit, and P. Bégué, : “Vaccine mandates in France will save lives,” Science 359: 283-284, 2018.

Plotkin SA, Offit PA, Reiss D.: Important New Resource for Clinicians Giving Expert Witness Testimony on Vaccines. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 37(12), Dec. 2018.

To the Editors:

Vaccination is under attack by individuals who occasionally use the legal system to oppose mandatory vaccination laws and in some cases to obtain exemptions for particular children whose parents are opposed to vaccination. During the legal proceedings, as we have witnessed, experts testifying in favor of vaccination may be challenged with references from journals of doubtful quality that oppose vaccination.
To provide important references that discuss and disprove claims made against vaccines, the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia has created a library of references addressing certain safety issues that may be useful as an aid and refresher to clinicians giving expert testimony on the safety of vaccines and to lawyers defending vaccination of children.
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia legal library may be entered through the web address vaccine.chop.edu/safety-references.
We would be grateful if you could inform your colleagues about the availability of this resource, which should be of great value for experts testifying for vaccination and for clinicians who need to convince parents about vaccine safety. https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Fulltext/2018/12000/Important_New_Resource_for_Clinicians_Giving.42.aspx

2017

Offit, P.A.: “Commentary: Science Denialism Isn’t New to the Trump Administration,” Philadelphia Inquirer December 22 2017.

Offit, P.A.: “By Regulating Homeopathic Remedies, FDA Holds ‘Modern-Day Snake-Oil Salesmen’ Accountable,“ Philadelphia Inquirer December 28 2017.

2013

Williams SE, Rothman RL, Offit PA. Schaffner W, Sullivan M, Edwards KM. A randomized trial to increase acceptance of childhood vaccines by vaccine-hesitant parents: a pilot study. Academic Pediatrics (2013) 13: 475-480.

A look at his recent papers shows he is targeting vaccine hesitant parents.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Offit+PA&cauthor_id=24011750&size=20

…..

Steven Pergam, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Medical Director
Infection Prevention
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance — Seattle, WA

He seems to specialize in cancer and immuno-compromised and seems to be the best of a bad bunch. But then we look at this:

SPECIAL NATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES:

2009–2010 Independent Safety Monitor, NIH/NIAD, DMID Influenza Protocols: 09-0039, 09-0043, 09-0047, 09-0053, and 09-0054: H1N1

2010–2011 Independent Safety Monitor, NIH/NIAID, DMID Protocol 09-0002: Comparison of the Safety and Immunogenicity of Lyophilized IMVAMUNE® (1×108 TCID50) versus Liquid Formulation IMVAMUNE® (1×108 TCID50) Administered by the Subcutaneous Route and a Lower Dose Liquid Formulation IMVAMUNE® (2×107 TCID50) Administered by the Intradermal Route in Healthy Vaccinia-Naïve Individuals (Bavarian Nordic)

2011–2013 Member, Data and Safety Monitoring Board: Effect of tenofovir on genital HSV shedding: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial

2015-present Member, Zoster Working Group, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services

2016-present Member, Abstract Selection Committee, Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)

2016-2017 Independent Safety Monitor, NIH/NAID, DMID Protocol 16-0117: Comparison .of High vs. Standard Dose Flu Vaccine in Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

15. RESEARCH FUNDING

Current: Washington Vaccine Alliance (WAVA) Pilot Award (PI: S. Pergam) 10/1/13-6/30/20 Interactions between gastrointestinal microbiota, Influenza vaccine responses and respiratory viral infections in a large cohort of clinic employees

BAA-NIAID [Fauxi Director]-DMID-NIH-AI (PI: M. Ison; Subcontract PI: Pergam) 5/1/16-4/30/20 Phase II Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Nitazoxanide in Acute and Chronic Norovirus in Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Solid Organ Transplant Recipients 1U01AI132004-NIAID (PI: N.Halasa; Subcontract PI: Pergam)

7/5/2017-6/30/20 High vs. Standard Dose Flu Vaccine in Adult Stem Cell Transplant Recipients 1R01AI134808-NIAID (PI: D. Fredricks)

Completed:

NIH/NIAID T32 AI007-044 (PI: W. Stamm) 9/1/05-2/1/07 Host Defense Training in Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Industry Sponsored Clinical Trials:

Chimerix, Inc. (PI: Pergam) 2016-current An Intermediate-size, Expanded Access Protocol to Provide Bincidofovir for the Treatment of Serious Adenovirus Infection or Disease, Protocol CMX001-35”

6/17/2017-present Prior Industry Trials Merck, Sharp & Dohme Co., Inc (PI: Pergam)

2012-2015 Pergam, SA – CV Page 15 A Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of V212 in Recipients of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplants (HCT)

Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* (PI: Pergam) 2013-2015 A Phase IIIb, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Demonstrate the Safety & Efficacy of Fidaxomicin for Prophylaxis against C difficile-Associated Diarrhea in Individuals Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplants (HCT) *formerly Optimer pharmaceuticals

KRT16/26/21, 01:40 PM

$ACXP In December 2014, Merck ($MRK) paid US$9.5 billion for Cubist ($CBST) largely to obtain marketing access to agents daptomycin and fidaxomicin. https://stocktwits.com/symbol/CBST

Chimerix, Inc. (PI: Pergam) 2016 A Multicenter Non-Interventional Study to Obtain Retrospective Data for Subjects Previously Diagnosed with Adenovirus Infection to serve as Matched Historical Controls for Study CMX001-304; Protocol No. CMX001-305

Chimerix, Inc. (PI: Pergam) 2015 – 2017 A Phase 3, Open-label, Multicenter Study of the Safety/Tolerability and Efficacy of Brincidofovir (CMX001) for the Prevention of Adenovirus (AdV) Disease in Subjects with Asymptomatic AdV Infection at Risk of Progression and for the Treatment of Subjects with Localized or Disseminated AdV Disease

Chimerix, Inc.

All that shimmers isn’t … enhanced by lipid conjugate technology. Chimerix is a development-stage biopharmaceutical company, dedicated to accelerating the advancement of innovative for patients living with cancer and other serious diseases. Its two clinical-stage development programs include dociparstat sodium (DSTAT) and brincidofovir (BCV). DSTAT, is a glycosaminoglycan derivative of heparin with known anti-inflammatory properties and BCV is an oral antiviral in development for the treatment of smallpox.

2505 Meridian Pkwy Ste 100 Durham, NC,

https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.chimerix_inc.a1878daaef1b59d25a1d2e8876c4b4bf.html

Chimerix, Inc.’s key principal is Michael A Sherman. Chimerix, Inc. has 54 employees

https://wallmine.com/people/8557/michael-a-sherman

…..

Jay Portnoy, M.D.
Expertise: Consumer Representative (This the guy who is supposed to represent the interests of the Public.)
Professor of Pediatrics
Medical Director of Telemedicine Section of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, MO

Offices and Board of Directors:

American Board of Allergy & Immunology (ABAI). 2014-present.

Vice President, American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 2005-6.

Board of Directors, Black Healthcare Coalition. 2006-2009. [He is WHITE]

Editorships and Editorial Boards

Regional Editor, World Allergy Organization Journal. 2008 to 2012.

Section Editor, Annals of Allergy and Asthma. Appointed 2002 to 2005

Editor, Current Opinion on Allergy & Asthma. Issue on Pediatric Allergy. 2004 and 2005

Editor, Current Allergy and Asthma Reports. Issue on Pediatric Allergy. 2001-2013

Editorial Board, Allergy Watch. 1998-2001.

Editorial Board, Annals of Allergy and Asthma. 1994 to 2006

Editorial Board, Current Allergy Practice. 1993 to present

Other Appointments

FDA advisory panel (CBER), Allergenic Extracts.

2017-present FDA advisory panel (CDER). Respiratory and allergy drugs.

2010-present FDA advisory panel (CBER), Allergenic Extracts.

2005-2010 Special Emphasis Panel. T-cell Epitopes. NIAID. 2011.

https://www.fda.gov/media/105541/download

The guy has 151 papers mainly dealing with allergy so I am not going to look at all of them.

He seems to work with Environmental Allergens Workgroup. Also with American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology – “…a professional medical association of more than 6,000 allergist-immunologists and allied health professionals…” He is a Fellow, American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI) …. if you search long enough…. You find an AAAAI Legislative Action article urging Allergists to support Fauci’s funding.

NIAID, NIEHS, NHLBI, MCAN Workshop Report: The Indoor Environment and Childhood Asthma: Implications for Home Environmental Intervention in Asthma Prevention and Management

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), and Merck Childhood Asthma Network (MCAN) sponsored a joint workshop to discuss the current state of the science with respect to the indoor environment and its effects…

Adverse reactions to vaccines practice parameter 2012 update

…..Thus although patients with a history of mild reactions to egg ingestion (hives only) can receive their vaccine in a primary care provider’s office, those with a history of more severe reactions (cardiovascular, respiratory, or gastrointestinal symptoms) should receive the influenza vaccine in an allergist’s office. In both cases, personnel to recognize and equipment to treat anaphylaxis need to be immediately available, but the allergist’s office affords additional expertise in this area should it be required…..
…..There has been a great deal of additional information published over the past year demonstrating the safety of influenza vaccination in patients with egg allergy. Health care providers should no longer withhold the vaccine from any patient with egg allergy. In an update to recommendations made in the last year, it is now considered safe for patients even with a history of a severe egg allergy to receive influenza vaccination…..

No worries, we will revive you when you almost die of anaphylaxtic shock, it is utmost importance for us to jab you with a shot that is probably useless so we can get paid our bonus.
…..

Andrea Shane, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc.
Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics
Director Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Emory University School of Medicine – Atlanta, GA

Joint appointment:
Assistant Professor of Global Health Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University 01 September 2013-present

Military or Government Service: Lieutenant Commander, United States Public Health Service, 2001-2003; Inactive Reserve Corps (IRC) 2003-until IRC dissolved in 2010.
……
The United States Public Health Service is a collection of agencies of the Department of Health and Human Services concerned with public health, containing eight out of the department’s eleven operating divisions. The Assistant Secretary for Health oversees the PHS.
WIKI

ALSO:

OASH oversees the Department’s key public health offices and programs, a number of Presidential and Secretarial advisory committees, 10 regional health offices across the nation, and the Office of the Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. https://www.hhs.gov/ash/index.html
……

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis working group, appointed member, 2009-until committee dissolved by CDC in 2011.

Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) National Global Public Health Committee (NGPHC), appointed member 2010-2013.

World Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (WSPID), Board Member and member of the Education Committee representing the Pediatric Infectious Disease Society (PIDS), appointed 2017; term through 2019.

[THIS IS WHERE SHE HAS A LOT OF POWER]
Manuscript reviewer:
American Journal of Infection Control, 2001-2003
Clinical Infectious Disease Journal, 2003-present
Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2003 – present
Pediatrics, 2006 – present
Journal of Pediatrics, 2006-present
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2003-present
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 2003 – present
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 2006 – present
Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal, 2006 – present
Neonatology, 2008 – 2010
Journal of American Medical Association, 2009 – present
JAMA Pediatrics, 2013 – present
Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 2013-present
Pediatric Research 2017-present
Clinical Therapeutics, 2017-present
Faculty of 1000 (f1000), Public Health and Epidemiology section, post publication peer review of publications, 2009 -2011. [WTF???]
Pediatric Infectious Disease section with creation of the section, 2011-2014.

Honors and Awards:
International exchange fellowship, Children’s Hospital at Montefiore and Beijing Children’s Hospital, Beijing, China October-November, 1999

Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Crisis Response Service Award, 2002

Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Outstanding Unit Citation, 2002

National Foundation for Infectious Diseases (NFID) Advanced Vaccinology Course Travel Grant to attend ADVAC 9, Annecy, France, 2008

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Special Recognition, H1N1 influenza research, 2010

Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Award for Excellence in Partnering-Domestic to NETEC (the National Ebola Training and Education Center)…. This award recognizes programs’ initiative and effectiveness through establishing and sustaining a strategic partnership with government, private sector, volunteer, or nonprofit organizations, 24 March 2016.

Contracts:

Co- investigator, NIH/NIAID/DMID Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU) – Emory University School of Medicine. Role: Site PI on rotavirus vaccine cross-over trial, DMID #08- 0017 and influenza vaccine to breastfeeding women trial, DMID#09-007; site co- investigator on other trials. Salary support, 01 August 2007- 01 August 2016….

………….

Paul Spearman, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Director, Division of Infectious Diseases
Albert B. Sabin Chair in Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Professor, Department of Pediatrics
University of Cincinnati School of Medicine Cincinnati, OH

This guy is a really big heavy weight. There is cross-over with the lady, Andrea Shane above. Any bets he pulled her in to be his ‘female puppet’ – a good little government soldier?

11/2005-09/2016: Professor and Division Director Nahmias-Schinazi Research Chair Pediatric Infectious Diseases Department of Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine
11/2005-09/2016: Associate Director for Pediatric Studies Emory Vaccine Center Atlanta, GA
03/2009-09/2016: Vice Chair for Research Department of Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine
03/2009-09/2016: Chief Research Officer Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta, GA

[Andrea L. Shane is Attending Pediatrician Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Emory Healthcare Grady Health 01 August 2006 – present ]

This guy has a full page of
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS:
a. National and International:

NIH Councils and Study Sections Chair, NIH ZRG1 AARR-E (41)
December 2016 Member, NIH ZRG1 AARR-P (02)
December 2016 Chair, NIH SEP: ZRG1 AARR-K (02)M; AIDS and related research SEP
August 2016 Chair, NCI Board of Scientific Counselors, Site Visit Team, Review of HIV DRP, Frederick, MD
July 2016 Chair, NIH SEP: ZDE1; Approaches to Eliminate HIV and Opportunistic Pathogens from Oral Reservoirs
November 2015 Chair, NIH SEP: ZRG1 AARR-E; AIDS and AIDS-related
July 2015 Chair, NIH SEP: Basic Research on HIV Persistence
March 2015 Chair, NIH/NIDCR Review Panel on HIV and Oral
March 2015 Opportunistic Pathogens
.
.
.

NIH/NIAID HIV Vaccine Trials Network
Protocol Chair, HVTN 088 Protocol 2010-present
Chair, Chiron/Novartis Products Development Team 2000-2007
Chair, Wyeth Products Development Team 2001-2007 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 049 Protocol 2002-2007 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 056 Protocol 2002-2006 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 061 Protocol 2003-2005 Member, HVTN Phase I-II Committee 2002-2005 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 088 Protocol 2010-present
NIH/NIAID/DMID Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit Co-Principal Investigator, Emory VTEU site 2007-present
Protocol Chair, VTEU 0008 Protocol 2009-2014
NIH/NICHD-Westat/NIAID IMPAACT Network Principal Investigator, Emory IMPAACT site 2014-present
.
.
.
CONSULTANTSHIPS:
Chiron, HIV Vaccines Development Team, Emeryville, CA 2003, 2004
Wyeth, HIV Vaccine Programs, Pearl River, NY 2003, 2004

EDITORSHIPS AND EDITORIAL BOARDS: [Again this is where a lot of power lies.]
Member of Editorial Board, Journal of Virology
Member of Editorial Board, Virology
Member of Editorial Board, Current HIV Research
Academic Editor, PLoS One

MANUSCRIPT REVIEWER: [There is that POWER again]
Journal of Virology (numerous, 1995-present)
Virology (numerous, 1998-present)
Current HIV Research (2001-present)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Biochemistry (2005, 2006)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Traffic (2005, 2006, 2007, 2013)
Ad Hoc reviewer, JAIDS (2004, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015)
Ad Hoc reviewer, JBC (1997-present)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Leukocyte Biol (2000)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Vaccine (2000-2016)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Virus Research (2005, 2012, 2012, 2013)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Nature Structural Biology (2005)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PLOs Medicine (2006, 2007, 2008)
Ad Hoc reviewer, J Mol Biol (2007,2012, 2015, 2016)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PNAS (2007, 2008, 2009,2012, 2013, 2014)
Ad Hoc reviewer, JCB (2007, 2008, 2010, 2011,2012, 2013)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PLOs One (2008, 2009, 2010,2011,2012, 2013, 2014) 6
Ad Hoc reviewer, Cell Host and Microbe (2008-present)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Nature Medicine (2009, 2011,2012, 2016)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PLOs Pathogens (2009-present) Ad Hoc reviewer, J Immunology (2010, 2011, 2013) Ad Hoc reviewer, Retrovirology (2011-present)
.
.
GRANT SUPPORT:
a. Active Support

Federally funded:
NIH R01 AI058828: Role of Vpu in HIV Particle Assembly. Funded since 2004, currently in no-cost extension with competing renewal under review.
NIH R01 GM111027-17A1: Viral and Cellular Determinants of HIV-1 Assembly. Funded 9/16/2013-8/31/2017 (Principal Investigator). $200,000 initial period; $800,000 direct costs.
NIH R01AI11863: Mucosal Protection against HIV Generated by PIV5 Priming and VLP Boosting. Funded 4/01/2014-8/31/2018 (Principal Investigator, Multiple PI grant). $351,366/yr.
Private foundation funded:
None presently.
Industry Contracts:
None presently

b. Previous Support:
NIH R01HL125042: HIV-induced Redox Stress and the Alveolar Macrophage as a Resistant Reservoir. Funded 7/01/2014-6/30/2018 (Principal Investigator, Multiple PI grant). $686,584/yr; relinquished upon relocation to Cincinnati.
NIH K12 HD072245: Atlanta Pediatric Scholars Program. Funded 04/01/2011-11/30/2016 (Program Director). $324,000/yr.
HHSN275201300003C: Westat/NICHD Contract- IMPAACT Network; Pediatric and Adolescent HIV/AIDS Research Program at Emory University. Funded 9/01/2014-8/31/2019 (Site Principal Investigator). $450,000/yr estimated.
NIAID-DMID-NIH AI2012144: Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units (VTEU). Funded 9/13/2013-9/12/2020. (Co-Principal Investigator). $4-5M/yr estimated. 8
NIH R21 AI098592: HIV-specific B cell repertoire in humans following cross-clade immunization. Funded 7/01/2012-6/30/2014 (Principal Investigator). $150,000 initial period; $275,000 direct costs.

NIH R01 AI090656: Broadly-reactive antibodies against chimeric virus-host antigens. Funded 06/14/2010-05/31/2014 (Co-investigator).

I wonder if he knows Ralph Baric??

NIH U01 AI069418: HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Unit. Funded 2/01/2007-11/30/2013 (Coinvestigator). HHS N272200800005C: Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units. Funded 11/01/07- 10/31/14 (Co-Director), $2,494,361/yr.
NIH U01AI78407 : Clonal Analysis of the Human B Cell Response to HIV. Funded 2/01/08-01/31/13 (Co-Investigator), $150,000/yr (Emory component); $750,000 total.
NIH RO1 AI40338: Viral and Cellular Determinants of HIV-1 Assembly. Funded since 1994; (Principal Investigator). $250,000 initial period; $1,150,000 total- now transitioned to GM111027 (active, above).
NIH R01 CA27834: Genetics of Primate “D” Type Retroviruses. Funded 09/24/07- 11/30/12 (Co-investigator), $250,000/yr, $1,250,000 total.
NIH R01 AI084834: Defining Neutralization Breadth in HIV-positive serum. Funded 9/01/2009-8/31/2011 (Principal Investigator), $250,000 initial period, $500,000 total.

NIH R21 AI65312: Pseudovirion Formation by Live Vector HIV Vaccines. Funded 06/01/2006-05/31/2008 (Principal Investigator), $150,000 initial period; $300,000 total.

NIH R01 AI067101: Novel Assays for Inhibitors of HIV Assembly. Funded 6/15/2005- 5/31/2008 (Principal Investigator), $200,000 initial period; $550,000 total.
NIH U01 AI47985: HIV Vaccine Trials Units. Funded 06/00-05/05. $1,438,628 initial period; $7,637,877 total.
NIH P30 AI054999: Vanderbilt-Meharry Developmental CFAR. Funded 05/01/03-04/30- 06 (Co-investigator), $528,468 initial period; $1,633,442 total.
NIH R29 AI40338-01A1: Membrane Binding and Transport of HIV-1 Pr55Gag. Funded 03/97-03/2002 (Principal Investigator). $ 70,000/ year; $350,000 total.
NIH R21 AI44369 (Innovation Grant): Development of Enhanced HIV-1 Pseudovirion Vaccines. Funded 07/99-06/01(Principal Investigator). $140,000/ year; $260,000 total.
NIH R55 CA83527-01A1: Induction of KSHV replication by HIV-1. Funded 03/00-02/02 (Principal Investigator). $80,000 total.
.
.
.
NIH R01 AI52007: Development of Enhanced HIV-1 Pseudovirion Vaccines. Funded 06/2002-05/2007 (Principal Investigator), $225,000 initial period, $1,125,000 total.

NAI113678, GlaxoSmithKline: An open-label, multicenter, single arm study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intravenous zanamavir in the treatment of hospitalized adult, adolescent, and pediatric subjects with confirmed influenza infection. Funded 10/02/12- 05/01/15. Principal Investigator.
P903-23, Cerexa: A multicenter, randomized, observer blinded, activ-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline vs. comparator in pediatric subjects with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Funded 01/01/2013-12/31/2014. Principal Investigator.
Merck Contract: Protocol 007: A Probe Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of a Three-dose Regimen of the Ad5 Gag Vaccine in Healthy Adults. Funded 04/01-12/02, $113,000 total (Principal Investigator).
Merck Contract: Protocol 012: A Probe Study of the Safety, tolerability, and Immunogenicity of the Ad5 HIV-1 Gag Vaccine. Funded 07/01/01-06/30/2003, $114,000 total (Principal Investigator).
Merck Contract: Protocol 016: A phase I dose-ranging study of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the Merck trivalent adenovirus serotype 5 HIV-1 gag/pol/nef vaccine in a prime-boost regimen in healthy adults. Funded 05/01/03-04/30/05, $117,000 total.
Basic Research Grant, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation: Pseudovirion formation by live vector HIV vaccines. Funded 03/01/02-02/28/2004, $180,000 total.
.
.

LECTURESHIPS, SEMINAR INVITATIONS, AND VISITING PROFESSORSHIPS:
.
.

Invited speaker, Peking University Department of Biomedical Engineering, Beijing, May 2015: “HIV-1 replication in macrophages”
Invited speaker, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Beijing, May 2015: “Intracellular trafficking of the HIV envelope glycoprotein”

…………

Geeta K. Swamy, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Senior Associate Dean Vice Chair for Research & Faculty Development
Associate Professor, ObGyn
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Duke University, Durham, NC

2004 – 2006 Duke University Associate Faculty Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Division of Clinical & Epidemiological Research

2009 – present Duke University Vaccine Trials Unit Investigator Duke Translational Research Institute Durham, NC

2010 – 2018 Duke University Director Duke Perinatal Research Center Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Durham, NC

2012 – present Duke University Associate Professor Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Durham, NC

2013 – present Duke University Human Vaccine Institute Investigator Durham, NC

2016 – 2017 Duke University Associate Dean for Regulatory Oversight & Research Initiatives in Clinical Research Durham, NC

Professional Awards and Special Recognition

2008 NIH Young Investigator Award Perinatal Research Society Meeting, Santa Fe, New Mexico
2010 NIH – NIAID Special Recognition for H1N1 pandemic
2013 and 2014 “Outstanding Reviewer” (Top 10%), Obstetrics and Gynecology
2014 “Outstanding Reviewer” for Vaccine

RESEARCH

Active Grants:
NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Units (MFMU) 4/7/11 – 3/31/21

NIH-NICHD (Swamy) Principal Investigator Participation as a clinical site in the NICHD sponsored MFMU Research Network to investigate treatment strategies for common yet unresolved obstetric conditions through large multicenter collaborative trials

Past Grants:
Health Works for Women, NIH Summer Research Fellowship, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, 1994

PiiiTCH Study-Prevention of Influenza in Infants by Immunization of Their Household Contacts (CDC, Walter) Co-Investigator

NIH-NIAID (HHSN272200800057C, Swamy) Duke Site Principal Investigator
Randomized, Double-Blind Trial on Safety & Immunogenicity of Inactivated Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in Pregnant Women

NIH-NIAID (HHSN272200800057C, Swamy) Duke Site Principal Investigator A Phase II Study in Pregnant Women to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Unadjuvanted Sanofi Pasteur H1N1 Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Administered at Two Dose Levels

GlaxoSmithKline (Swamy) Cost-effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy An epidemiological study to develop and validate a model for estimating the costs and outcomes related to seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy for both mothers and infants through age 6 months.

Charles Hammond Research Fund (Gray) Mentor Assessing Decision Making & Acceptance of H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Administered in a Research Setting In Pregnancy

CDC-NCIRD – 1U01IP000190-01 (Swamy) Principal Investigator Effectiveness of a Vaccination Program in the Community ObGyn Setting The main objective of this 2-year project is to conduct a clinic-based study to develop and assess the effectiveness of a vaccination program for adolescent and adult women in the community Ob/Gyn setting.

ACOG/Merck & Company Research Award on Immunization (Fortner/Swamy) Mentor/Principal Investigator Compliance with Vaccination in the Obstetrical Setting with Novel H1N1 and Seasonal Influenza Retrospective review of births occurring in Durham, North Carolina during the 2009-2010 influenza season to evaluate influenza vaccination practices during the novel H1N1 pandemic.

Charles Hammond Research Fund (Swamy) Principal Investigator Association of Circulating Mitochondrial DNA Content and Preterm Birth Among Black Mothers

NIH-NIAID (HHSN272200800057C, Swamy) Duke Site Principal Investigator A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial on the Safety and Immunogenicity of Seasonal 2010-2011 Inactivated Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in Pregnant Women
.
.
Vaccine & Treatment Evaluation Units 9/16/13 – 9/15/23
NIAID (HHSN272201300017I, Walter and Swamy)
Co- Principal Investigator Participation as a clinical site in the NIAID sponsored VTEU Network to conduct clinical trials of vaccine and treatments for infectious diseases

Contract PI for the following active trials
 A Phase I, Double-Blind, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of NTM-1632 vs Placebo Administered Intravenously in Healthy Adults

 Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Colonization and Disease Among Pregnant Women: A Historical Cohort Study

 A Phase I Cohort-Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial in Healthy Adults to Assess the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of a Monovalent Inactivated Influenza A/H5N8 Virus Vaccine Administered Intramuscularly at Different Dosages Given With or Without AS03 or MF59 Adjuvants: Assessment of Immunological Responses and Lymphocyte Interplay

 A Phase II, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of 5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel Administered Intravaginally for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis

 A Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Dose Escalation Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated West Nile Virus Vaccine, Hydro Vax-001, in Healthy Adults

 An Opportunistic Study to Evaluate the Population Pharmacokinetics of Beta-lactam Antibacterials in Adults Including Elderly Subjects (POPS_SILVER)

 A Population Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate Disposition of Azithromycin and Ertapenem in Pregnant Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery After Failed Labor (POPS_CAN_DO)

 Targeted Reduction of Antibiotics Using Procalcitonin in a Multi-center, Randomized, DoubleBlinded, Placebo-Controlled Non-Inferiority Study of Azithromycin Treatment in Outpatient Adults with Suspect Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) and a Procalcitonin (PCT) Level of ≤0.25 ng/mL (TRAP-LRTI)

Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Group-Sequential Study to Determine the Immunogenicity and Safety of a RSV F Nanoparticle Vaccine with Aluminum in Healthy 3rd Trimester Pregnant Women; and Safety and Efficacy of Maternally Transferred Antibodies in Preventing RSV Disease in their Infants Novavax, Inc. (Swamy) 12/1/15 – 7/31/19

Principal Investigator Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) 9/29/15 – 9/28/18 Clinical Study of the Safety of Simultaneous Administration of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine (Tdap) and Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV) in Pregnant Women CDC (HHS200-2012-53663, Swamy) Principal Investigator
.
.
.
GlaxoSmithKline Speaker Services, 2009 – 2012

NIH-NIAID Division of Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Working Group on the Enrollment and Safety Assessments of Pregnant Women in Clinical Trials of Drugs and Vaccines, 2010 to 2015

National Vaccine Advisory Committee – Maternal Immunization Working Group – 2014 to 2016

Appointed Member, February 2017 to present
HPV Working Group, February – June 2018

Consultative Workshop on Immunology Research Gaps Related to Maternal Immunization – Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, May 25-26, 2015

WHO Brighton Collaboration Global Alignment of Immunization Safety Assessment in Pregnancy (GAIA) – Chair, Fetal Distress Working Group – 2015

Independent Data Monitoring Committee, GlaxoSmithKline, Inc. – RSV vaccines for the protection of children, 2015 to 2017

Data Safety Monitoring Board, Randomized Controlled Trial of Influenza Vaccine and Meningococcal Vaccine in Pregnant Malian Women and Their Infants Up To 6 Months of Age, Sponsor: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, 2011-2016

………….

Gregg Sylvester, M.D., M.P.H. +
Expertise: Alternate Industry Representative

Vice President – Medical Affairs
Seqirus Inc., Summit, NJ

Physician | Public Health Expert
Pharmaceutical Executive Expert in vaccine preventable diseases, pediatrics and population health.

Career Highlights
• Head of Medical Affairs for Seqirus, a CSL company
• Launched Pfizer’s Pediatric and Adult Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, as well as Meningococcal B vaccine in the USA
• Launched Merck’s HPV4 vaccine in over 100 countries, presented to numerous National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs), public health and medical societies
• Partnered with community organizations in Delaware to reduce infant mortality, teen pregnancy rates and HIV rates

Professional Experience
SEQIRUS, a CSL company Summit, N.J Vice President, Medical Affairs 2016 – present
• Responsible for the strategy and implementation of Medical Affairs plan
• Ensures appropriate use of Seqirus’ influenza vaccines
• Overseas Phase IV research and presents data to NITAGs and other key stakeholders.

PFIZER VACCINES Collegeville, Pa
Vice President, Medical and Scientific Affairs: Americas 2013 – 2016
• Spearheaded science-based rationale to preserve Prevnar 13 infant schedule in US recommendations
• Successfully achieved an adult Prevnar 13 recommendation from US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice
• Accelerated launch of groundbreaking Meningococcal B vaccine to accommodate urgent public health need

Global Head of Medical Affairs for Pediatric Vaccines 2010 – 2013
• Global Medical Lead for Pfizer’s Pediatric vaccine, Prevnar 13
• Created medical strategy for Prevnar 13, an asset exceeding over $5 billion in revenue
• Created innovate systems to improved scientific exchanges in a complex, global environment

MERCK VACCINES West Point, PA
Global Head of Medical Affairs for Adolescent Vaccines 2005 – 2010
• Created the medical affairs strategy for Merck’s HPV4 vaccine, Gardasil
• Spokesperson for all Merck vaccines
• Traveled extensively throughout the world presenting to governmental officials, regulatory agencies and public health/medical congresses

CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM Greenville, DE
Medical Director, Eugene DuPont Preventive Medicine & Rehabilitation Institute 2001 – 2005
• Led Preventive Medicine for Delaware’s largest health care organization
• Expanded the community-based health programs, serving more than 50,000 people/year

DELAWARE HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES New Castle, DE
Cabinet Secretary 1997 – 2001
• Reported directly to Governor of the State of Delaware
• Managed the largest state agency, with more than 5,000 employees and an operating budget of ~$1 billion
• Implemented Medicaid Managed Care and Children Health Insurance Program (sCHIP) in Delaware State

Health Officer 1995 – 1997
• Led Delaware’s Public Health Division
• Formulated Public Health policies and supervised programs addressing high infant mortality rates, teen pregnancy rates, and low childhood immunization rates
• Promoted to Cabinet Secretary within one year

Chief of Community Health & Director of Maternal & Child Health 1993 – 1995
• Directed the development and implementation of community-based public health programs for the state of Delaware
• Managed an annual budget of $30,000,000 and 330 public health professionals

Selected Board Positions
IMA World Health: Chairman of the Board: 2017-2018;
Board Member: 2013 – present

DONORS: The majority of IMA World Health’s projects are funded through grants from generous public funding agencies and foundations.
CORUS INTERNATIONAL
◦ IMA World Health | Corus World Health
◦ Lutheran World Relief
◦ CGA Technologies ==> https://www.cgatechnology.com/
◦ Ground Up Investing
◦ LWR Farmers Market Coffee

Selected Honors and Awards
Merck Global Human Health Awards – 2007 & 2006 Winner: Franchise of the Year; 2006 Winner: Best Support of International Markets and 2008, 2007 & 2006

Education & Training Fellowships:

Public Policy – Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation, assigned U.S. Senate, Washington, DC
Epidemic Intelligence Service – Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Atlanta, GA
General Preventive Medicine Resident – Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD
Pediatric Intern, Resident and Chief Resident – Children’s Hospital of Buffalo – State University of New York at Buffalo School of Medicine, Buffalo, NY
Master of Public Health – Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore,
MD Doctor of Medicine – Albany Medical College, Albany, NY
Bachelor of Arts – (History) – Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY
Veteran Status Commissioned Officer, United States Public Health Service: Rank – Commander – 1990 -1993

Summary

These are the people who have no problem giving an unvetted vaccine to children and pregnant women before the safety data is available. After all, they have been doing it on a smaller scale most of their careers.

-Gail Combs

GC/wm (written/edited)

DEAR KAG: 20220128 – The Pub is OPEN / Wolf’s Big Howl on January Sixth / Defeat The Mandates Picture Gallery / Why Isn’t Vaccine Localization a Thing?

The Pub is OPEN!

It’s GALLERY NIGHT, wherein our intrepid “print screen photographer” and “substitute bartender” presents his “artistic screen shots” of the Defeat The Mandates rally in Washington, DC.

While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we will continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.

Tonight’s drink special is not ethanol, but rather a different alcohol – epinephrine – a.k.a. – ADRENALINE.

Stay tuned! We’ll explain later!

Christmas Spirit

It looks like SANTA is still somewhere NORTH of the border, but he’s bringing FREEDOM!

Playing on the Jukebox

Well, we were looking for some stuff that was COMPLETELY DIFFERENT on the persnickety jukebox, and look what we found near the end of the last slider…..

EPIC COWBOY/WESTERN ROCK.

What the FREAKIN’ ‘ELL.

https://youtu.be/I8gr2hmIbew

Not sure what’s wrong enough with me to like this, but if you don’t enjoy this crazed version of cowboy, try an even crazier version of “Indian”.

And I mean that BOTH WAYS.

This stuff looks straight out of Burning Man.

And while that’s kind of interesting, it’s not about the kind of FREEDOM that goes with the ART on the wall tonight.

SO – we add some EPIC FREEDOM MOOD MUSIC for your GALLERY TOUR tonight.

That’s more like it.

And now, the rules of the pub.

HOUSE RULES

Now, back to business.

AMEN!

FREE the JANUARY BROTHERS

Article: Another Witness Tells Mafia Nan To GO TO HELL

And in the following video, you can actually hear the HOWL of WOLF MOON, telling MAFIA NAN exactly how he felt, when her Praetorian guard fired GRENADES upon a crowd filled with GRANDPARENTS, WOMEN and CHILDREN on January 6.

https://youtu.be/27Fci99hGww

Source: Capitol Offense: The Ugly Truth Behind The Five Deaths From January 6th and 7th – https://taylerhansen.substack.com/p/capitol-offense-the-ugly-truth-behind

Hat Tip GA/FL who made me aware of this excellent research.

My experience (including my WOLF HOWL) was documented in Section 4 of the following post, entitled

We Are Mighty To Save This Republic

The Truth About Our January Sixth Protest I was there, and I am PROUD of it. I am proud of the thousands and thousands of patriots who showed up to make an historic statement that the other side could only TRY to stop, by besmirching its beauty with their LIES and TRICKERY. Yes, their LIES …

Current Art On The Wall

We have a really interesting PHOTOGRAPHY exhibit in the bar this week. Consider this to be “gallery night”.

Prints are available FREE by right-clicking – or whatever you need to do on your device.

We have more pictures than just this collection, but these are some of the best. Enjoy a selection of magical moments from the DEFEAT THE MANDATES rally in Washington, DC last Sunday.

Dr. Heather Gessling

Dr. Lynn Flynn

Looking for this lady’s name!

Looking for this gal’s name, too!

Ernest Ramirez (vaccine injured and lost son)

And over in the corner, THIS RIGHTEOUS RANT is playing on a loop on our FREEDOM TV.

If you haven’t seen it, watch it. If you have seen it, watch it AGAIN!

Finally, you can watch the entire video HERE:

From: https://thehighwire.com/watch/

And now for our feature presentation…..

Why Isn’t Vaccine Localization a Thing?

One of the thing that tells me science is really out of whack right now, is the fact that scientists are discouraged from doing simple, plain-Jane things that would actually make vaccines safer for the general public, but are instead encouraged to go off in other, riskier, sexier, more profitable directions, while protected by a kind of “media umbrella of propaganda” which justifies, and rationalizes, but does not convince the HONEST skeptic and investigator.

In a sense, we still have the same sort of “patent medicine killers” of the late 19th century, with their poisonous potions – we’ve just changed WHO it is who is allowed to kill people and make money with bad medicines.

The fact that the very first COVID vaccines were of a risky, barely understood, and rather experimental type (mRNA or viral vector, i.e. genetic, full spike, in humans), while EASIER, FASTER, CHEAPER, SAFER, and much more familiar and better-understood vaccine types (protein or glycoprotein antigen, subunit) were IGNORED and SLOW-WALKED until later – well, it would have boggled my mind a long time ago, but no longer.

In my opinion, the “science”, if you can call it that, was guided by FAUCI PATENTS, rather than by what would have been best for patients AND for vaccine science.

The point about damage to vaccine science ITSELF is a point that Robert Malone often makes, which is critical. The people behind the bad, biased, self-interested, money-making vaccine choices, didn’t just screw THE PEOPLE – they screwed up the SCIENCE.

Let me be blunt. When people LIKE ME attack Tony Fauci, we’re not attacking science.

We’re attacking ABUSE OF SCIENCE by an OUT-OF-CONTROL BUREAUCRAT, aided by MERCENARY GLOBAL CORPORATIONS.

Tony Fauci is biased and corrupted by many sick and damaging compromises and ties to the industry he is SUPPOSED to be countering when necessary on America’s behalf – NOT coddling at every personally beneficial turn.

And all of this WRONGNESS was created under the cover of Francis Collins, who was used as a very phony TOTEM of “ethics” and “morality”. The man was pimped to the masses as a great Christian, as if that meant he WOULD and COULD do something about bureaucratic ethics and morality, while those very virtues he was meant to represent but not interfere with, were UNDONE by a series of corrupt administrations.

There is a LOT that is wrong with government regulation of science and medicine right now, and we need to talk about it.

Tonight, I’d like to talk about just ONE point of vaccine science which is weirdly out of whack, and protected ONLY by propaganda – and that is vaccine localization.

That means MAKING THE VACCINE STAY PUT WHERE YOU INJECT IT.

Obviously this is not working. OK? I’ll just be blunt.

One of the points frequently made against actual science on social media, mostly by CCP propagandists, IMO, is that vaccines simply do not leave the injection site, and thus all these systemic and distant effects which people allege to have been caused by vaccines, could not possibly have been caused by the vaccines. I saw this canard far more often than I should have, because people, generally, are not prepared to debate it.

Even when people just argue the evidence back and forth, because the reality is fuzzy and moves around between “localizes” and “migrates”, the argument itself is a fantastic deflection by the “protectors of vaccines”. Instead of talking about the very real problems caused by even LIMITED MIGRATION of vaccines, we’re one step removed from the problems.

These sorts of arguments – that the spike protein vaccines could NOT be migrating from the injection site – were completely undone by the Pfizer data obtained from Japan.

Yes, it was animals, and yes, it was perhaps at an over-sized dose, but the numbers themselves were SO substantial that these kinds of factors basically “factor out”. There is NO DOUBT from this data that there is a RISK of migration of “vaccine which infects cells and cranks out [highly pathogenic] spike protein which is HOPEFULLY dealt with cleanly by the immune system”.

The propaganda that vaccines don’t migrate was CLEARLY violated by the case at hand. That propaganda disappeared rather quickly, although I still hear it from nurses, and just bite my tongue.

Further – shockingly – the idea that the lipid nanoparticles containing the vaccine mRNA (basically what are called “virus-like particles” when injected as part of wasp venom) could actually have time to persist as part of skin lipids and BE SHED – well, it’s rather obvious from the data that this is a very real possibility.

The SKIN is an organ just like everything else. Everything else meaning all the OTHER organs that were getting the vaccine mixed into THEIR lipids in shocking amounts for a very long period of time.

Suddenly the CRAZIEST of the conspiracy theories about the mRNA vaccines was LITERALLY – and I mean LITERALLY – biophysically possible.

I had previously come up with a marginally feasible idea that maybe the spike protein itself was not just toxic, but HORMONE-LEVEL ACTIVE, to explain what people were reporting. But with the Pfizer data, I didn’t need any of that. The VACCINE ITSELF was ready to be shed.

And Pfizer hid this. Yeah. I can kinda see why.

So – if I may – let’s just set aside this foolishness that vaccines don’t migrate, and never have systemic or distant effects, because they do. It’s VARIABLE, but it’s REAL.

So why don’t people DO anything about this?

Why not do things that would absolutely ensure that vaccines CANNOT leave the injection site?

I can imagine a lot of things that MIGHT do this, but had never heard about any adjuvants or additives or vaccine designs that could effectively localize vaccines to arm or shoulder muscle, and simply make sure they didn’t migrate to even the slightest degree.

Solve THAT problem and pericarditis is GONE – RIGHT?

So why not do it? And why not BRAG about it if you CAN do it? Why not say how it’s done?

CRICKETS.

FAST FORWARD to a recent bit of knowledge that I happened upon IN REAL LIFE.

I noticed that I was somewhat jittery after having some minor dental work done. I was quite numb for the work, but later, after leaving the dentist’s office, with the numbness now faded, I noticed that I was shaky, edgy, and “wired”. That went away over the rest of the day. I just assumed that it was a side effect of the anesthetic.

I mentioned this to an anesthesiologist and a nurse, who both explained to me that it was NOT due to the anesthetic, but rather to epinephrine, which is sometimes ADDED to an injectable anesthetic in order to LOCALIZE it.

They explained to me that by epinephrine constricting the blood vessels in the region where the anesthetic is injected, the body removes less of the anesthetic by drawing it away in the blood stream – so the anesthetic STAYS at the site of the injection, giving a longer duration of anesthesia.

Sure enough, when I looked this up online, I found out it is quite real.

**https://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Fulltext/1998/05000/The_Effect_of_Varied_Doses_of_Epinephrine_on.21.aspx**

So I immediately thought to myself – why not do the same thing with vaccines?

Why not try to localize them with something like epinephrine?

But when I looked THAT up, the only results that I got, were for use of epinephrine (you know, as in the EPI PEN) in treating anaphylactic reactions TO vaccines. I probably didn’t look hard enough, but I’m not trying to get a patent or anything like that.

So who knows? It may be that adding epinephrine to vaccines could actually be GOOD in terms of reducing the severity of anaphylactic reactions – in addition to localizing the vaccine.

However, the possible technical feasibility of doing something isn’t my point.

My main point is simply ADMITTING THERE IS A PROBLEM.

If you could simply make these DAMN mRNA vaccines STAY where you put them, and if they didn’t crank out a bunch of bad stuff into the blood stream, then perhaps the only long-term risk would be something like cancer AT THE SITE OF INJECTION.

However, let’s be real. Nobody even TALKS about the problem. The media just DENIES IT.

In my opinion, “they” aren’t addressing this problem, because it gets on the way of “their” real purpose or purposes.

Vaccine localization is the last thing that these people wanted to “solve” here.

The people who CONTROL science and medicine don’t have to tell us about their entire agenda. They only have to tell us things that are somewhat plausible and rational.

In my opinion, mandatory vaccination is a PLATFORM for SOCIALISTS to do whatever they want to whomever they want. It gives them cart blanche to change society without accountability. That is the big picture, and has been their objective for well over 100 years.

Look at what communists are doing to Uighurs in Communist China RIGHT NOW.

Former #Uyghur camp detainees said they were given injections that stopped their periods or caused unusual bleeding consistent with the effects of birth-control drugs. #China_kills_muslims #EVilCCP https://t.co/xSDOvxS6xL
— Jeshurum david (@DavidJeshurum) July 17, 2020

Of Course: Bill Gates Praises China’s Response to COVID https://t.co/meIzorcKSM
— Sharon (@SweetFreedom29) January 24, 2022

Changing PEOPLE directly changes society FASTER.

They want to keep you alive, they keep you alive.
They want to sterilize you, they sterilize you.
They want to experiment on you, they experiment on you.
They want to kill you, they kill you.

Doing things which do not contribute to, or which would actually IMPEDE their “unholy grail” goal of direct control over humans, is simply NOT going to happen, if THEY can help it.

But that doesn’t mean that WE can’t give them a BAD HAIR DAY, EVERY SINGLE DAY, and fight for WHAT IS RIGHT in science and medicine.

defederalization of science
destalinization of medicine (de-obamatization in practice)
force ethics and transparency where socialists don’t want them
bring anti-deception tools and language INTO science itself
chase politics out of science, acting in both of them
increase citizen science literacy outside compromised institutions
work toward a BOR-compatible medical freedom amendment
many more

SO – just remember this.

Science and medicine won’t change when THEY do something about it.

Science and medicine will change when WE do something about it.

Coiled up badly flat like a damned garden hose in a round box. Who’da thunk?

W

NOT A VIRUS! They’re homemade pomegranate moon pies!

¡Muy explosivo!

Nuclear translocation of spike mRNA and protein is a novel feature of SARS-CoV-2

W

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

The Business At Hand

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But we’re ON A ROLL.

The Rules

A Moment of Prayer

MUSICAL INTERLUDE

Call To Battle (H/T Sundance)

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

…..and now for…..

Microwave Monday

MASSIVE EMR Infographic (Thumbnail)

MASSIVE EMR Infographic (Full Version)

Google Is Now Anti-Science

“Nor do we allow content from any site that contradicts or runs contrary to scientific or medical consensus and evidence-based best practices.”

mRNA Vaccines Really Do Change Your DNA

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

Abstract

In fact, in the following blog post I made in April of 2021, I actually hypothesized a scenario which is basically the findings of the De Marinis paper!!!

The Jaenish paper proves that the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus alters human DNA.

The De Marinis paper proves that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine also alters human DNA.

Peter McCullough:

Thus, if it’s OK to have vaccines that do what Pfizer’s vaccine does, then it’s OK to remove the restrictions on benzene, and have benzene everywhere. Likewise for thousands of other chemicals.

Alex Berenson:

Karl Denninger:

So About Not Needing Actual Study…[Comments enabled]

The Jaenisch paper was concerning smoke.

The De Marinis paper is a four-alarm FIRE.

Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

genome

noun

genomic DNA

Used in a sentence:

Used in a picture:

Used in a video:

That’s all, folks!

ENJOY THE SHOW

W

The Pub is *STILL* OPEN!

We are doing our best under the circumstances!

Christmas Spirit

HOUSE RULES

AMEN!

Free the January Brothers

(no matter what the SHANGHAI SLIDER says)

Current Art On The Wall

G-Bay (Gab Marketplace) Is Here

Fake Science Normalized by Fake News and Fake Entertainment

IT IS YOUR DUTY TO PERCEIVE AND REJECT FAKE SCIENCE.

Malone and Bhakdi Validated by “Pro-Vax” Paper

A Health Public Policy Nightmare

WHUUUUUUUUT?????!!!!!

We’re not only the news now.

We’re the science now.

ENJOY THE SHOW.

W

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

The Business At Hand

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But it doesn’t matter, because with God, every day is glorious!

The Rules

Thus we are assembled here to peacefully address our grievances to whom they may concern, even each other, using both our freedom of speech and of press, as well as our freedom of religion.

A Moment of Prayer

MUSICAL INTERLUDE

Call To Battle

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

The Pub is STILL OPEN!