Category: Fake News

Grey Swan Event Flock – Why Nothing Can Stop What's Coming

There is a guy on Hillary’s side, who saw Trump coming – like a sky filled with bombers – but nobody listened. He published his theory of the “danger” of a Trump victory on May 26, 2016.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/26/opinion/campaign-stops/the-fears-trump-needs.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/26/opinion/campaign-stops/the-fears-trump-needs.html

While the author, Ross Douthat, didn’t exactly realize what Trump was up to, nor the fact that Trump was going to win, nor even WHY Trump was going to win – he was remarkably close, compared to most of “left-world”. I don’t think Douthat realized that (1) he (Douthat) was not actually looking at the right gray swans, and (2) TRUMP was the one generating the gray swans, through intellect, cunning, love, and sheer hard work.

Douthat believed that, rather than by one, big, unforeseen cataclysmic event – i.e., a “black swan” – a string of uncertainty-generating random-ish events could “accidentally” put Trump in the White House.

The reality is that Trump – grabbing and working HUNDREDS if not THOUSANDS of gray swan OPPORTUNITIES – coalesced them all into a comfortably large margin of tiny wins, including unforeseen victories in multiple swing states, to become the 45th President of the United States of America.

This “gray swan” view of the world – the idea that the world can be changed by a stream of perhaps uncommon but not rare events – is key to two things – both of which have high impact in my life:

  • The Plan, as in “Trust the plan.”, as in Q.
  • the slow, steady work of the “event people”, as I call them – but you might know them as “the Deep State”, or perhaps the people who killed Jeffrey Epstein, JFK, RFK, MLKJ, Ron Brown, and many others.

Trump’s path to 2016 victory could actually be viewed as part of “The Plan”, and I would certainly view it that way. But that is just the beginning, in my current opinion.

“The Plan” is actually much bigger than Trump.

MUCH, MUCH BIGGER.

So how do I know this?

Because I believed Q when he said “You have more than you know.”

3570
[C]oats Before [D]eclas
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI1 Aug 2019 – 1:22:36 PM
[C] before [D].
[C]oats before [D]eclas.
The month of AUGUST is traditionally very HOT.
You have more than you know.
Q

Q’s last post before 8chan was shut down by the enemy

So – where do I begin? How about Q Day – August 17, 2019?

Harry Lime
August 17, 2019 at 05:17

The Bob Lazar interviews are fascinating. He claims to have worked at Area 51 on alien spacecrafts and he is very convincing. The technology he describes is kind of mind-blowing.
This body language dude is a little goofy but he does a decent job of analyzing the interviews. It takes a few minutes to get going…the actual interviews start around 2 minutes and fifty seconds into the video…

[see video below]

Liked by you and 9 other people

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/08/17/dear-kmag-20190817-open-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-232945

Now, I’m going to repeat that video here, but I will just preface things by saying that learning about Bob Lazar was a kind of “gray swan event” for me. It’s a predictable but uncommon critical event. It was evidence meeting a mind that was uniquely ready for it.

It was “UFO stuff” hitting me as edge science with which I was somewhat familiar.

I have traditionally avoided “UFO” stuff. Yes, at various, sporadic times, I’ve read bits and pieces with a kind of curious, almost morbid interest, but INVARIABLY I get to the point of being “turned off” by the cult-like, phenomenal nature of it all. Too many crazies. Too many new-agers. Too many – as Bob Lazar puts it – BAT SHIT CRAZY people. They seem like very nice people, but they also seem very crazy – much more than I could possibly be myself. It makes me start to think that NONE OF IT IS REAL. And yet the idea that it’s NOT REAL simply flies in the face of the most basic scientific and even (strange yet important) religious logic.

What this is, is actually rather profound. It is direct evidence of the psychologically unsettling nature of the ET problem – a demonstration of its power. It may even be a demonstration of how little we understand.

Many people who follow the field do seem like curious, interested, investigatory people. Some also seem like honest witnesses who have had legitimate odd experiences, which are temptingly explained by equally odd theories.

But some people – who blithely talk about hundreds of abductions – well – I simply have my doubts.

ALTHOUGH – when I approach the problem from a technological standpoint – I could see how CREATING such people would not only be possible, but also very useful. It would be the ultimate living disinformation – and, ironically, it protects its own creation – the mark of truly MASTERFUL disinformation. You have to BELIEVE the person about some initial encounter to explain why the rest of what they are saying is NOT TO BE BELIEVED.

Kinda evil, when you think about it.

I don’t doubt ALL of the “abduction” stories. The Barney and Betty Hill story, I believe strongly. I will come back to that, at some point, if only because I HAVE TO COME BACK TO IT.

I’m not even sure I really WANT to believe. Aliens are kinda scary. Indeed, I have actually been a DEBUNKER at times. I’m particularly good at debunking moving and reflected lights. The first time I solved a “reflected light UFO video”, I was ECSTATIC. I felt “better than Snopes”, because I debunked with absolutely no agenda – neither “confirmation bias” nor “debunking bias” (and trust me – nobody ever talks about “debunking bias”, or “anti-confirmation bias”, but it is VERY REAL). Seriously, I would have LOVED for that light to have been a real UFO – but I proved the other side because THE TRUTH HAS NO AGENDA.

The trouble with Bob Lazar, however, is that not only was he very believable – what he said made sense to me in ways that go way beyond why almost anybody else on the planet would believe him. I simply have hidden knowledge matching up to his story.

Bob Lazar began to solve nearly all the mysteries of my life in ONE VIDEO. This one. As I will explain in a moment.

https://youtu.be/WpN5PjOxHbo

If you want to go back and see all the comments that fell out of this video, go to the following link:

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/08/17/dear-kmag-20190817-open-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-232945

My first comment, however, will give you a flavor of the rest:

wolfmoon1776
August 17, 2019 at 06:03

OMG – I just stopped playing this at 16:24, where they’re talking about element 115.

This connects to all the crap that happened around the time I underwent MK.

He says something about the island of stability stuff. THAT was the stuff that got me into trouble in the early 1980’s. I noticed MISSING THEORIES. Based on my understanding of history of science and science itself, I told my professor that there seemed to be missing theories in nuclear physics. It was a logical argument. Based on some existing theories, and the details of how they had originated, it was almost impossible that certain other similar theories didn’t exist – and yet there were no known theories of a certain type.

At that time I wasn’t particularly suspicious – I thought it might just be some kind of interesting historical “phenomenon” – like a random void in science itself (which is a very cool concept in information theory – how does one CREATE or MAINTAIN a void in information?) But I didn’t know WHY it would be missing. I didn’t think that there was any reason to hide theories in that area. These are general science theories. There was not even a popular IDEA that some general theories were “off-limits”. People in science ASSUMED that certain TECHNOLOGY might be classified, but the idea that the most BASIC SCIENCE might be classified – THAT was unheard of back then.

Well, based on what this guy is saying, he is talking about stuff which would be elegantly explained by the theories I thought were missing. I know exactly what he is talking about, and he would have known exactly what I’m talking about.

Which is another tell. This guy acts just like a lot of scientists I’ve known. Just like normal. Just like he was in the lab next door explaining his stuff.

HOLY SHIT.

But his case also explains why they were interested in using MK on scientists, and presumably experimenting on it at the time. If you can keep their secret stuff compartmentalized, it can be protected. This guy (and maybe others) had gone off the ranch, and the military had a security problem. So they HANDED OFF THE PROBLEM to the CIA to deal with MK experiments. Which (from my point of view) are to some extent successful and to some extent not.

And everybody is still interested in these problems.

But OMG – I am so happy that:

– the class of theories I thought should have existed actually exist
– the theories work
– they would explain the island of stability
– there IS an island of stability
– elements in that island of stability create cool tech

HOLY SHIT! This stuff is REAL!

OK. Now I know why Cankles is in trouble!

She gave this shit to China! Without permission!

Liked by 15 people

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/08/17/dear-kmag-20190817-open-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-232960

Now – I’ve already modified my thinking on some of this, and things now make EVEN MORE SENSE. And that is why I am now talking to you all.

After I saw this Bob Lazar YouTube video, I decided to drop by a bookstore and see if I could find any of the Bob Lazar DVDs, as well as any other information on “alleged” alien propulsion technology, or “alleged” (or “fake science” “real”) information on higher post-actinides like element 115, now known as Moscovium. Information – disinformation – I can use it all.

I was VERY specifically looking for what I might call “REAL ALIEN STUFF”. I wanted things that were being dismissed along with the entire category, but were very likely real. Other stuff like Bob Lazar. Things that might seem bogus to most people, but would have the STENCH of awful reality to me.

And, OH, brothers and sisters, DID I FIND IT.

What I did NOT expect, was how utterly seamlessly this stuff integrated with all of the following:

  • my parents’ lives
  • my life, including childhood, education, and employment
  • history of science, including stuff that is rather obscure, but of which I have personal knowledge
  • the “real” history of the United States that I have pieced together after dumping fake news, fake entertainment, fake science, and fake history
  • the Q revelations
  • my personal readings and extensions of the Q revelations
  • the alleged “alien-free” Q history revealed through the following video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsaZF2E2uI4

Now – I want to be VERY careful here. I could mention or better still EXPLAIN many specifics from this book, and HOW they integrate with the things I described above. And, indeed, I WILL do that at some point. It will be very convincing. But CONVINCING YOU ALL is not what I want to do. I would prefer for you all to simply MAKE UP YOUR OWN MINDS.

I am stealing a page from Q, and asking you all to simply READ THIS BOOK and prepare to have your minds blown, by what amounts to “future proves past” on this 1997 book, which was itself relying on “future proves past” about 1947, 1962, and the surrounding years.

I believe that this book may have been part of PLANNED DISCLOSURE. Even the TIMING (50 years after Roswell) seems to have been part of the deal.

Now – it is important for me to address how this stuff affects – or more importantly does NOT affect our little site here.

We have a wide range of MAGA opinion here, across the entire spectrum of both RELIGION and SCIENCE. I am not going to try to “convince” anybody of things they either don’t believe, can’t believe, or don’t want to believe. However, as a free speech site, I will be discussing a lot of things which – AT ALL TIMES – some people absolutely WON’T BELIEVE.

That’s OK. It works that way for everybody. You can say what you think, and you WILL let others say what they think – without denigration or artful inhibitions – other than the first time, which will be the last time. Disagreement is fine – we cannot increase our understanding without it. Open disagreement is better, because if it’s not shared, what use is it? But we will have to let each other say disagreeable things, as I will explain momentarily.

I personally think we’ve done really well on this front – the art of enlightened discussion of hot topics – but this is going to move into new territory.

I am going to state the following in a “future proves past” way:

What is coming – which cannot be stopped – will shake up “what we know” and “how we know it” in profound ways.

However – WE – who are able to discuss BOTH science and religion FREELY – are uniquely prepared for this “rough ride”.

Those who can understand the future from the vantage points of both science and religion will have a much easier time moving into that future. Those who refuse to use one tool or the other will have far greater difficulties dealing with the future.

When I say this, I am including people who oppose either religion or science, but actually know something about what they oppose.

You will not have to give up your beliefs. You will have to re-understand them. You will have to SEE YOUR OWN BELIEFS DIFFERENTLY.

The curves of a changing reality will simply be too steep to allow people to remain exactly where they were before, absent running into the mountains and living in a shack, where CHANGE cannot find them.

In fact, it is imperative that you not give up your beliefs. The FUNDAMENTALS of those beliefs are important. Their being shaken up is an opportunity for opponents of those beliefs to make you “switch worldviews”. DON’T FALL FOR IT. That is my advice. The “hasty jump” is rarely wise. Maybe NEVER wise.

Now, I’m going to close by going back just slightly on what I said. One impression I got from the book is this:

America was blessed with WISE LEADERSHIP in both Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower. We are once again blessed with such leadership now, in President Donald J. Trump.

So with that, let The Q Tree Book Club begin!

W

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-day-after-roswell-philip-j-corso/1103252092

https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/isbn/9780671004613/

https://www.hpb.com/products/the-day-after-roswell-9780671004613

My Dinner With Andrew

I must be in a retro mood.

This last day started off – late Wednesday night and early Thursday morning – with my little TOM PETTY rant.

Scammin’ Me

Thanks to our QTreeper realsauce who posted a great Tom Petty video, Won’t Back Down, here: LINK: https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/08/14/speech-protecting-the-red-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-230851 Suddenly I remembered one of my FAVORITE videos of all times – the one where Tom Petty understood FAKE NEWS, FAKE ENTERTAINMENT, FAKE SCIENCE and FAKE HISTORY literally DECADES before we did. Here are the original lyrics, …

Wolf, August 15, 2019

It didn’t end there. Thursday night, I thought about doing ANOTHER “audio visual” production like it, using another great song. However, I stopped myself. I knew it WASN’T ENOUGH.

Yes, it would have been powerful, but it was not going to WIN. It was not getting DEEP ENOUGH on the problem. Not deep enough to MAKE THIS MOVEMENT SUCCEED. And I believe that each of us needs to FIND WHAT IT IS that we can do to make this movement WIN and WIN BIGLY.

Maybe I’ll come back and do that musical “meme-stream” someday. But not tonight.

There is something welling up in me – a kind of urge to scream FUCK YOU at the people who have screwed up this world by TAKING what was not theirs – who used not only RIDICULE, but DECEPTION and TRICKERY to grab the steering world of this planet and drive it into a kind of ongoing TRAIN WRECK, from which, instead of accepting their own mistakes, they merely demanded MORE POWER and MORE CONTROL.

Do you know what I’m saying? What I am feeling is RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION.

This isn’t merely an intellectual argument – it’s a CULTURAL ARGUMENT – an EMOTIONAL ARGUMENT – even a SELF-CRITICAL ARGUMENT – an argument grounded in our FAILURE to engage the enemy – an enemy which mocks us from the TRASH HEAP of their own mistakes.

These people deserve FAR WORSE than what we have the RIGHT to do – which is to THROW THEIR ASSES off of their trash heap of not just mistakes, but LIES, TRICKS, and CRIMES – and FORCE THEM to help us clean it all up.

THERE. Now that I’ve GOTTEN THAT OUT – it’s time for STORK to BITCHSLAP MY ASS.

Now – I could put that in the hilarious context of the original movie, and THAT is, indeed, part of the answer.

But let’s not go there yet. Someday, perhaps, in a full post. The cultural deconstruction of Animal House over time is a great way to look at both cultural Marxism and reaction to it, as BOTH are embodied in the film. And THAT is something we need to understand. But not right now.

Tonight, I was going through replies in my notifications, and thinkthinkthink pointed out a video which is, ultimately, the whole point of this post.

This is a STILL from the video. Clicking on it won’t make it play. Nevertheless, the image is worth a closer look in zoom.

If there is NO OTHER 1-hour video that you watch this year, then I would recommend that THIS BE THE ONE.

This is possibly the SMARTEST discussion on the right since the 2016 primaries.

What you have here are two of the GREATEST intellects and culture warriors on our side not quite agreeing on things – maybe even not quite getting each other. What results is FAR, FAR BETTER than if they were just high-fiving each other in total understanding. They are trying to convince each other of two perspectives of the SAME THING, and what that paints is a STEREOSCOPIC PICTURE of a NEUTRON BOMB for WINNING THE CULTURE WAR.

What that thing is, is CORE ANDREW BREITBART. Eventually, Bannon actually brings up Breitbart, and recommends Righteous Indignation as the must-read book for this moment, and particularly for a deep understanding of cultural Marxism.

There was a film back in the day – My Dinner with Andre – that was one of those artworks you never forget. This was 1981 – three years after Animal House. The movie is just two people talking about things that have nothing to do with the setting, so you have to use your imagination to tap into the RICHNESS of what they are talking about. AND IT WORKS – in a huge way.

There is a person you never see – central to the discussion – who is like the THIRD STAR. Not exactly a new technique – both Shakespeare and Hitchcock loved it. But when the cast is this small, it has a wonderful effect. It is DEEPLY SATISFYING.

THIS video of Candace and Steve has the same effect. And what is even more wonderful, is that – along with the “stars” of this video, you get to “discover” that the je ne sais quoi they are trying to put their finger on actually IS Andrew Breitbart himself.

WE NEED ANDREW. And we need him NOW.

NOW – before I make everybody RUN AWAY in horror, thinking this video is merely some kind of “rightstream intellectual art flick bullshit“, let me confidently estimate that there are HUNDREDS of game-changing and actionable political ideas here, that will make a huge difference in winning not just 2020, but 2024 and 2028. So THIS NEEDS TO BE WATCHED. By as many people on our side as possible.

But savor it. You don’t see stuff like this every day.

It’s bizarre as hell. These two geniuses could be talking on a park bench in New York City, a dock in Florida, or a picnic table in Wyoming. The setting doesn’t matter. Yeah, the border figures into some of what they talk about, but ignore it. The TRUTH of what they’re saying – especially toward the END – is amazing.

Bon appétit!

W

https://youtu.be/qC-r0izU4j0

Scammin' Me

Thanks to our QTreeper realsauce who posted a great Tom Petty video, Won’t Back Down, here:

LINK: https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/08/14/speech-protecting-the-red-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-230851

Suddenly I remembered one of my FAVORITE videos of all times – the one where Tom Petty understood FAKE NEWS, FAKE ENTERTAINMENT, FAKE SCIENCE and FAKE HISTORY literally DECADES before we did.

Here are the original lyrics, as nearly as I can tweak them to the ad libs of the video:

Tom Petty And The Heartbreakers Lyrics

“Jammin’ Me”

You got me in a corner
You got me against the wall
I got no – where to go
I got no – where to fall

Take back your insurance
Baby nothin’s guaranteed
Take back your acid rain, baby
Let your T.V. bleed

You’re jammin’ me
You’re jammin’ me
Quit jammin’ me
Hey you can keep me painted in a corner
You can look away, but it’s not over

You’re jammin’ me

Take back your angry slander
Take back your pension plan
Take back your ups and downs of
Your life in raisin-land

Take back Vanessa Redgrave
Take back Joe Piscopo
Take back Eddie Murphy
Give ’em all some place to go

You’re jamming me
You’re jamming me
Quit jammin‘ me
Yeah you can keep me painted in a corner
You can walk away, but it’s not over

Take back your Iranian torture
And the apple in young Steve’s eye
Yeah take back your losing streak
Check your front wheel drive

You’re jammin’ me
You’re jammin’ me
Quit jammin’ me

Take back Pasadena
Take back El Salvador
Take back that country club they’re
Tryin’ to build outside my door

You’re jammin’ me
You’re jammin’ me
Quit jammin’ me
Baby you can keep me painted in a corner
You can walk away, but it’s not over

Oh you’re jammin’ me
Quit jammin’ me
You’re jammin’ me

Well, you know what?

Time for an update.

STAND BACK!

Wolf Moon And The Deplorables Lyrics

“Scammin’ Me”

(Try playing the song while you read – it really helps!)

You got us in a corner

You got us against the wall

We got no – where to go

We got no – where to fall

Take back your crap insurance

With Obama’s guarantee

Take back your global warming

‘Cause we cut our T.V.s free

You’re scammin’ me

You’re scammin’ me

Quit scammin’ me

Hey you can keep us punched in a corner

But we will walk away, and it’s not over

You’re scammin’ me

Take back your patsy killers

Take back your gun grab plan

Take back your mind control of

Your lies in razor-land

Take back your crooked Clintons

Take back your fraud named O

Take back Loretta Comey

Give ’em all some place to go

You’re scamming me

You’re scamming me

Quit scammin’ me

Yeah you can keep us punched in a corner

But we will walk away, and it’s not over

Take back your Iranian cash grab

And our Apple as Tim Cook’s spy

Yeah take back your losing wars

Based upon your lie

You’re scammin’ me

You’re scammin’ me

Quit scammin’ me

Take back your Venezuela

Take back Paul Manafort

Take back your city slackers

You’re tryin’ so hard to import

You’re scammin’ me

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) were joined by Democratic lawmakers from both the House and Senate on February 7, 2019, to introduce Green New Deal legislation.

You’re scammin’ me

Quit scammin’ me

Baby you can keep us punched in a corner

But we will walk away, and it’s not over

Oh you’re scammin’ me

Quit scammin’ me

You’re scammin’ me

Wolf Moon And The Deplorables Lyrics

“Scammin’ Me”

You got us in a corner
You got us against the wall
We got no – where to go
We got no – where to fall

Take back your crap insurance
With Obama’s guarantee
Take back your global warming
‘Cause we cut our T.V.s free

You’re scammin’ me
You’re scammin’ me
Quit scammin’ me
Hey you can keep us punched in a corner
But we will walk away, and it’s not over

You’re scammin’ me

Take back your patsy killers
Take back your gun grab plan
Take back your mind control of
Your lies in razor-land

Take back your crooked Clintons
Take back your fraud named O
Take back Loretta Comey
Give ’em all some place to go

You’re scamming me
You’re scamming me
Quit scammin‘ me
Yeah you can keep us punched in a corner
But we will walk away, and it’s not over

Take back your Iranian cash grab
And our Apple as Tim Cook’s spy
Yeah take back your losing wars
Based upon your lie

You’re scammin’ me
You’re scammin’ me
Quit scammin’ me

Take back your Venezuela
Take back Paul Manafort
Take back your city slackers
You’re tryin’ so hard to import

You’re scammin’ me
You’re scammin’ me
Quit scammin’ me
Baby you can keep us punched in a corner
But we will walk away, and it’s not over

Oh you’re scammin’ me
Quit scammin’ me
You’re scammin’ me

Wolf Moon, 2019

The words are yours. The music is presumably somebody else’s. Enjoy.

Speech-Protecting the Red Flags

Let me put the KILL SHOT on these “red flag laws” right up front.

Hard to read that graphic. Let’s make things just a bit more clear.

Now you MAY be saying “BUT WOLF – THAT’S NOT THE SECOND AMENDMENT – THAT’S THE *FIRST* AMENDMENT!“

To which I say “EXACTLY.“

Here is the explanation. It is, for lack of a better metaphor, how the Second Amendment and the First Amendment PEACEFULLY protect each other – by saying WWG1WGA.

Any “red flag law” that doesn’t EXPLICITLY PROTECT – better still EXCLUDE – all Constitutionally protected speech, beliefs, associations, and assembly, is not worth the paper that it’s written on.

The reason is that, absent explicit protections and exclusions, such laws may be interpreted in practice to deny citizens of their First Amendment freedoms – particularly SPEECH – by construing protected activities to be in conflict with other rights – specifically our SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

(This stuff used to be common knowledge before American crypto-Sovietism, by the way.)

This has often been referred to as a “chilling effect” – a sneaky form of infringement which is typically brought forth under the guise of laws utterly unrelated to speech, religion, or other First Amendment-protected activities. Enemies of First Amendment exercise will “hold other rights hostage” in a way that “chills” our claim to those First Amendment rights, lest we see the OTHER rights denied or potentially infringed. In almost ALL these cases, the parties backing such laws desire to infringe on BOTH freedoms, but will take either one, by constructing a FAILED law which puts them into apparent conflict.

The Constitution says NO – there IS no valid conflict, and if you are attempting to create one, even accidentally, then you are creating UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

Wolf Moon, Annoying Patriot, and Son of the American Revolution

SO BTFO, COMMUNISTS!

Republican lawmakers who think it necessary to have such “red flag” laws should TAKE NOTE before signing them. An ABSENCE of explicit Constitutional protections of SPEECH is, in my humble opinion, sufficient reason to veto ANY such legislation.

Our GENIUS President, Donald J. Trump, has personally given a demonstration of how this works, in a joking (well…. who knows…..) tweet. AND I QUOTE:

BOOM!

There you have it – the REALITY of “red flag” laws for millions of wonderful, trustworthy, but perhaps “not careful with their tongues” Americans. INCLUDING CHRIS CUOMO! Who I don’t particularly like, but whose rights to angrily argue and own a gun I will defend to the DEATH!

And what does this mean?

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1161287914208337920

The responses were uniformly BRUTAL for red flag laws.

SO – let’s look at this more closely.

Is Jack Posobiec right? Are “red flag” laws unconstitutional?

In my opinion, red flag laws CAN be constitutional. But I am not even sure if ANY of the existing ones are. And THAT is scary.

Ohio is proposing a red flag law which is designed to avoid many of the pitfalls of existing red flag laws. But even the proposed Ohio law really “needs some work”, in my opinion.

First of all, red flag laws need to respect both the SECOND and FOURTH Amendments.

Here is Dick Heller, of the famous Heller case, talking to OAN about this:

The SECOND Amendment is rather obvious. The FOURTH Amendment is more concerned with warrants, seizure of property, and probable cause – all of which are made more sketchy in red flag laws, when a JUDGE has not actually reviewed the evidence with opposing counsel present. THINK FISA COURT. Gun SEIZURE without the ability to challenge it IMMEDIATELY or better still BEFOREHAND is an idea that does not sit well with this here critter.

Now WOLF MOON – who thinks SCOTUS got the “gay marriage” thing all wrong by not using the FIRST AMENDMENT to protect both gay marriage AND polygamy, is often in the habit of picking DIFFERENT Amendments to defend freedoms. This time is NO DIFFERENT.

Yes, I agree with the Second and the Fourth, but I believe that the SIXTH and the FIRST are also very important here. We’ve talked about the FIRST – what about the SIXTH?

Some people might be A-OK with the idea of just giving up their guns, not being arrested, and arguing about it all later, but NOT THIS HERE WOLF.

“I WANT AN ARRESS!”

In fact. to be completely clear, I want an arrest, and a hearing with MY LAWYER and a JUDGE, and I want it BEFORE my guns are taken. This gives me my MAXIMUM rights under BOTH the Fourth and the Sixth Amendments.

Trust me – THIS OPTION is the most Constitutional of all. I will have WAIVED NO RIGHTS in picking this option.

SO – let me summarize. In my opinion, a potentially Constitutional red flag law must:

  • not take away my stringently guaranteed 2nd Amendment rights without due cause
  • respect the due processes of the 4th Amendment in a HUGE and optimal way
  • explicitly guarantee my FULL 1st Amendment rights, NEVER using protected speech, beliefs, or activities in any fashion to take away my 2nd Amendment rights
  • better still, EXPLICITLY EXCLUDE all 1st Amendment protected things, including speech, writings, religion, beliefs, assembly, associations, and memberships
  • allow arrest without seizure and a prompt hearing with legal representation, for MAXIMUM 4th and 6th Amendment rights
  • include strong deterrents for abuse in BOTH criminal AND civil law

Are you starting to see how much difference current red flag laws have from this ideal, with the ideal probably passing review by SCOTUS, and current laws actually being somewhat doubtful?

I’m kinda thinking Jack Posobiec is right.

NOW – let’s look at an example. This will demonstrate both the Constitutional requirements AND how SAFE a properly constructed “red flag” law could actually be – if enforced HONESTLY by HONEST law enforcement, including an HONEST FBI (cough, cough, COUGH, COUGH).

I have a person who believes in a CRAZY RELIGION. The crazy religion says that in order to go to heaven, one has to defend the religion violently against all non-believers, cutting off their heads. This person goes online and AGREES WITH ALL THIS, repeats it, and argues vociferously and ANGRILY for it, because he is a MUSLIM.

But in real life, he’s a nice guy, and has never even struck anybody.

Sorry – according to WOLF’S version of a CONSTITUTIONAL red flag law, this guy cannot even be “red-flagged”, and if anybody tries it, Peaceful Angry Muslim has grounds to SUE.

Like it or not, what YOU consider “crazy beliefs” are PROTECTED by the First Amendment.

Even VIOLENT BELIEFS are protected by the First Amendment.

EVEN HATE SPEECH and ANGRY SPEECH are protected by the First Amendment.

Even HATE GROUP ASSOCIATIONS and MEMBERSHIPS are protected by the First Amendment.

EVEN CRAZY SPEECH AND BELIEFS ARE PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

Violent actions are NOT protected.

So Violent-Talking Angry Muslim who never hurts anybody gets his gun.

Are we done yet? Can we still SAFELY have “red flag” laws with all these Constitutional protections and restraints?

Sadly, the answer is NO.

No, because the HOLDER/MUELLER/LYNCH/COMEY FBI – still politicized as hell, is DESPERATELY pushing for those unconstitutional, Nazi-style laws of the LEFT…..

Here is the article. I URGE YOU TO READ IT – especially between the lines. You will see how this is 99% propaganda of the moment. Digging up old posts to push for NAZI gun laws.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fbi-arrest-ohio-teen-online-threats-find-25-firearms-10-n1042036

They took this kid’s PARENTS’ GUNS to spice up the numbers, took his posts to paint him as a danger, and DESPERATELY tried to create a SECOND PUNCH after DUBIOUS DAYTON.

Only – well – it’s kind of a FAIL.

This is exactly the political stuff that the now-ruined CLINTON-OBAMA FBI pulled on President Trump. So do you know what I think now?

I think there is excellent reason to believe that the HOLDER FBI has been pulling ALL of these sketchy gun-ban propaganda mass shootings. The only difference here is that they’re running low on “MK specials” who can be manipulated into pulling off their shit. So they’re resorting to backing up their DAYTON SATAN mass shooter with a KID who – wonder of wonders – lives in the same state.

SAD, SAD, SAD.

This is why red flag laws are communist bullshit. They are not only of sketchy probable FBI / Deep State origin and definite FBI propaganda backing – they are simply TOO ABUSABLE.

Sorry – even if I saw a red flag law that EXCEEDED my recommendations here, I tend to believe that it would STILL BE ABUSED by political elements in the FBI.

Convince me that I’m wrong.

W

Who Is the "Grand Creator" of the Jarrett Youth?

And by Jarrett Youth, I mean the legions of socialist fear-bots led by this guy:

Remember this tweet, from #Parkland days?

https://twitter.com/cameron_kasky/status/965745458252599296

Here is that picture, all by itself:

I always assumed it was Cameron Kasky’s MOTHER. However, THIS meme (among others, saying the same thing) has appeared:

Now – I’m sorry, but I’m a bit of a devotee of Communist Hot Mama “Whoa Nelly” Ohr, who I find oddly attractive in a “OMG, WOLF – YOU DON’T ACTUALLY LIKE PORK RINDS AND OCTOPUS – DO YOU?” way.

I mean – hell – take a look at ‘er!

I mean, to quote a certain President:

“THAT FACE!”

And speaking of beauty – as soon as I figured out how much TIME this woman spent in the BIRTHPLACE OF BRAINWASH, all on her lonesome, the fake scandal known as “Muh Russia was OVER.

Any Trump-hating TDS lefty who, at that time, would have understood the implications of the above statement, would have been pissing their pants. The Mueller investigation wasn’t just TOAST – it was a time-bomb of 1000% REVERSO PLUS BACKFIRE located squarely underneath the Soviet Democrat Party.

And THAT was a BEAUTIFUL moment!

Now, to be completely honest, one actually needs more and different pictures of Whoa Nellie, because those OTHER PICTURES with less central weighting (see THE DOG) utterly rule out the proposition that these pictures are of the same person.

NO CHANCE.

SO – if that lady isn’t Sweet Nellie Ohr, WHO IS IT?

If you look at the replies underneath the Kasky tweet, you will likely come up with 5 or 6 different or slightly different theories of WHO it ACTUALLY is.

I followed one of them, and what I found was a lady who makes all kinds of sense in a CONVERGENCE OF SOVIET RED DIAPER, CRYPTOCOMMIE, AND CPUSA WAY.

But that could be wrong. I may have followed the wrong trail.

So I’m CROWDSOURCING this one.

WHO IS THIS WOMAN? REALLY?

Let the search begin.

W

PS: Cameron Kasky is an interesting fellow. I’m calling him an ACP – American Communist Princeling. Notice his new digs – Eric Holder’s old “radicalizing” haunt – meaning he’s headed straight for the Nomenklatura of Amerika. He’s 100% OCCUPATION CLASS.

If you look at Kasky’s 700+ Twitter follows chronologically, you can learn a lot. Everybody shows up to pay homage, but THESE got followed back – picked out from the plebes. EVERYBODY on the top left shows up – including all those new posers who want to be President.

While looking for information, I found THIS LINK. Those who are interested in all things KASKY will find it useful.

LINK: http://adam.curry.com/art/1519904866_MZhcpXLq.html

Here is that link’s assesment of the image:

First off let’s start with Cameron Casky. One of the overnight stars that boiled to the surface after the Parkland shooting.  Seen here with his grandma.  That’s not Nellie Ohr BTW. It was a hoax by Shareblue to poison the well.

I love it! Somebody who also gets DISINFORMATION.

So he says GRANDMA. Funny – that’s where *I* was looking, too.

So why is BROCK poisoning the well? Yeah. Worth a look.

Similar material on Neon Revolt – not sure how that works, but slightly different.

Jeff Kasky’s Strange, Scandal-Ridden History with One World Adoption Services

LINK: https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/02/27/jeff-kaskys-strange-scandal-ridden-history-with-one-world-adoption-services/

Is Joe Biden Accidentally Telling The Truth?

Joe Biden just claimed that he met the “Parkland kids” as VP.

From Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-10/biden-says-he-was-vice-president-during-the-parkland-shooting

Biden told reporters in Iowa on Saturday that “those kids in Parkland came up to see me when I was vice president.” But when they visited Capitol Hill to talk with members of Congress, lawmakers were “basically cowering, not wanting to see them. They did not want to face it on camera.”

Twitter then went nuts about it!

Everybody thinks that Joe Biden’s senility is making him FORGET that Parkland was in 2018, and he could not have met the “Parkland kids” while in office.

Well, this brought back some memories. Remember how David Hogg quickly showed up in WASHINGTON after Parkland, in 2018? Barely over a MONTH LATER, this guy is meeting with Propaganda Minister Valerie Jarrett before their little march and rally.

In the annoyance of that meeting, something else showed up. A few people were saying on Twitter that Hogg Boy had actually been to the White House BEFORE PARKLAND.

I saved the meme.

Is this the same David Hogg? I don’t know.

Is this a valid meme, and not a Photoshop? I don’t know.

If true, did he have some actual excuse to be at the White House? Probably.

And I wasn’t the only person thinking this.

I had tried DESPERATELY to get this meme to stick on Twitter, but it was a losing battle. You know how Twitter is. They just do whatever it takes to help the left. I was actually shadowbanned at the time, if I remember correctly, but you have to understand that they TESTED shadowbanning on me BEFORE it went big, so I may have not even been calling it shadowbanning back then.

Funny – searching on DuckDuckGo now, I even found my old tweets!

Barely any spread back then….

https://ibloga.blogspot.com/2018/03/david-hogg-met-with-valerie-jarrett-at.html

But remember what WAS big and COVERED UP the “David Hogg / Valerie Jarrett” weirdness?

https://www.tampabay.com/florida-politics/buzz/2018/05/29/when-roseanne-barr-went-after-david-hogg/

Roseanne. Yeah. THAT was the big Fake News “conspiracy”.

But yeah – the few of us who knew about this possible 2015 Hogg visit could not get the word out.

Until now, I always wondered WHY this kid would have been there, if he was in fact there.

Maybe Sleepy Joe is actually telling the truth.

Think about it. This kid is going to go through a LOT of “questioning” of his role, and if he lied, or had advanced knowledge, or even if he DIDN’T have advanced knowledge, but #Parkland was still being ORCHESTRATED above his pay grade, then the kid is going to need INCENTIVE to “stay on message” and not GET COLD FEET on the narrative, when the whole sketchy thing starts to look problematic.

Nothing like a WHITE HOUSE VISIT to provide that incentive, and make sure that he stays on message.

Here is what Biden’s “handlers” are saying:

An official with the Biden campaign said the former vice president was thinking of the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, when he misspoke. That attack, in which 20 children between six and seven years old were killed along with six staff members, was in December 2012.

Funny that there was no “traveling kids propaganda show” with Sandy Hook. That was the PARENTS. SOME of whom sure seemed more like ATTACHED SPOKESPEOPLE than actual grieving parents, who sat in the background crying.

Are you all starting to see how the STALINIST BLOOD THEATER works?

It’s not real. It’s not fake. IT’S BOTH.

“AND” LOGIC.

There was something else that was funny about David Hogg showing up early. There was ANOTHER incident like it.

He was also said to have been at CNN in Florida (forgot where) in December of 2017, before the #Parkland shooting. It was a personal visit of some kind. There was some “educational” reason. But interesting, isn’t it?

Sure seems like they PREPARED HIM. Perhaps not with his knowledge, but who knows?

Sketchy. The whole thing is sketchy, and smacks of the sick marriage of government and media that I call “governmedia“.

Dad is retired FBI, or at least they said he was.

Mom is some kind of CNN journalist, or at least they said she was.

It’s all sketchy.

And now just add Sketchy Joe Biden.

W

SKETCHY.

Top 10 Reasons "Red Flag" Laws Are Bad for America

If you’re not familiar with “red flag” laws, then you had best get there quickly. This new attack on the Second Amendment is actually WAY WORSE than any previous one, and constitutes what may be the most cunning attack on the CORE values of America EVER. The more I have learned about these laws, and analyzed them beyond that, the more alarmed I have become.

Or try this:

2h
ℕ𝔼𝕆ℕ ℝ𝔼𝕍𝕆𝕃𝕋Verified Account@NeonRevolt

This is the future @mitchellvii wants.

Blair CottrellVerified Account@RealBlairCottrell

FYI in Australia we have no right to firearms, need licenses, gun safes bolted to the floor and wall, ammo stored in seperate compartments, regular check-ups by state agencies etc and “red flag laws” have always been a thing here.

A colleague of mine had his firearms confiscated by the state after attending a rally against immigration policy. He took the state to court and after several months won his case and was able to recover his firearms, only to have the state then cancel his firearms license on a separate technicality, related to his “unsuitable character”.

Another colleague who was a regular attendee at political rallies has had his property raided by police at least three times in the past eighteen months, police claim to be “searching for illegal firearms”. They never find any and have no reason to believe they will, officers carrying out the raids have verbally apologised to him after each search, informing him that they’re just following orders.

Another man I know was gun pointed inside his own home by police after getting involved in a brief fist-fight with Antifa, after trying to attend the Milo event in Melbourne’s North. His wife and children watched their father cuffed at gun point inside his own house, before being taken to the police station to be questioned, then charged with “affray” –But the charge was later dropped.

This is what “red-flag laws” will get you in America. Regardless of the noble excuses the state and its pawns will make, this is how these laws are actually used in practice.

https://gab.com/NeonRevolt/posts/102580145193866343

And then it got WORSE.

At first, I was only gathering and looking at OTHER PEOPLE’S concerns. But then I started thinking about things on my own. I started putting FACTS together. I started asking what the EFFECTS of red flag laws – already known in Australia – would be on America.

I suddenly realized what is going on.

El Paso and Dayton are not merely about this election. They are about REVERSING THE TRUMP PHENOMENON for good. They are about UNDOING the “Q” movement. They are about restoring the FAKE NEWS. They are about SAVING GLOBALISM and DESTROYING AMERICANISM. And AMERICA.

And yet, it almost seems like we’re sleepwalking right into these damn things.

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1159608627818373121

So here you go. THIS is what these SICK laws are actually all about.

10. Red flag laws make SPEECH a RISK.

This was a profound realization – that RED FLAG LAWS CHILL FREE SPEECH FOR GUN OWNERS. Almost all of whom support TRUMP, by the way. Real “coincidence” there.

Gun owners CANNOT afford to “take chances” and “say the wrong thing”.

Think about what I just said. Think how ORWELLIAN that is.

What this means, then, is that Red Flag laws are in fact a profound attack on the FIRST Amendment, disguised as an attack on the SECOND Amendment.

They create an ARTIFICIAL CONTRADICTION between the FIRST and SECOND Amendments.

They conflate speech and violence on LEFTIST IDEOLOGICAL TERMS – using leftist minds as judges – just like Vysotsky’s Soviet ANTIFA does. Just like ANTIFA was DESIGNED to do.

ANTIFA, filled with boys who call themselves girls, and girls who call themselves boys, who says speech is violence, and violence is speech.

This is sneaky as hell. Frankly, I cannot imagine that even a cunning POS like Cryin’ Chuck, or a shifty old witch like CHI-FI, could think this stuff up.

Let me put it this way. If it wan’t CHINA that came up with red flag, it was probably ALIENS.

Pencil-necks. You know what I’m saying. THESE GUYS.

SCHIFF TEE PHONE HOME

9. Red flag laws turn neighbor against neighbor.

Again, this is incredibly insidious. Of course, COMMUNISTS and NAZIS love to DIVIDE people, but Americans? HOLY MOLY. I want to get along with my liberal neighbors. All this is going to do is generate suspicions and recriminations.

Yes, the COMMUNISTS who have taken over the Democrat party probably want MORE DIVISION, but that is the OPPOSITE of what Trump wants.

So why should we do it? As TRUMP supporters, we don’t WANT more division and suspicion.

8. Anonymous reporting makes political abuse a certainty.

Being able to CONFRONT ONE’S ACCUSER is a CORNERSTONE of our Constitutional rights. This is the SIXTH Amendment. This is the heart of DUE PROCESS.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Sixth Amendment

This ability to confront accusers, before FINAL ACTION is taken, serves to LIMIT the power of anonymous accusations or suspicions. People cannot “get what they want” by an accusation without DEFENDING IT FIRST in a courtroom.

At least, that was the way it was SUPPOSED to work.

SIDEBAR: Note that there is an opposite problem, when the media and FBI only work for one party, in that anonymous PUBLIC accusations are the only recourse – WHISTLE-BLOWING, basically.

Yes, we have something called “anonymous tips”. But in that case, police are required to investigate and THEN decide based upon their OWN investigation if there is REASONABLE CAUSE to take action. With “red flag” laws, police are compelled to act BEFORE there is even proof of a crime. Unproven accusations are usable to CONFISCATE ARMS – the FINAL ACTION of the process. THIS IS BACKWARDS LOGIC.

This is COMMUNIST and POLITICAL.

Once again, Communists are up to their FAVORITE TRICK – the politicization of processes. Just like the Communists now running the Democrat Party politicized the DOJ and FBI, now they want to politicize local policing. They did this with their “Promise Program” that destroyed due process in Parkland, and now they want to “go big” with destruction of due process, by taking the concept nationally, using “red flag”.

There is excellent reason to believe that POLITICAL OPERATIVES will use red flag laws to harass their enemies – meaning US. We have already seen incidents of this – the SWATTING of innocent people – in states and nations that have these laws. Australia is particularly bad.

I actually have personal experience with this. I had forgotten all about it, until today.

During the 2016 Trump campaign, I was falsely accused of illegal gun carry in a felony zone by anonymous Trump opponents. This was something of a mild “swatting”, and I was very fortunate, because the police didn’t believe the complaint (which I then proved was a lie). Since then, there have been TWO entrapment attempts on me, quite possibly orchestrated by federal agents of some kind.

Political harassment using law enforcement is REAL and very dangerous.

Wolf Moon

SO – do I personally believe that “red flag” laws will be abused? ABSOLUTELY. And I predict with CERTAINTY that they will be abused against ME, if passed in my state, or nationally.

I repeat – 100% certain that they will be used against me, because of this blog.

7. Solving rifle murders before illegal alien murders is illogical.

Just look at this graph.

This shows the power of the FAKE NEWS to distort the world in favor of DEMOCRAT GOALS.

The YUGE bar on the left is murders by illegal aliens.

The thin sliver on the right is murders by rifles. ALL of them.

Red flag laws will only solve a FRACTION of the deaths by rifles, on the right.

But now let’s consider theoretical “green flag” laws, which would treat illegal aliens like gun owners. We would deport the illegal aliens, based on anonymous tips, without THEIR due process rights. They would then be vetted like gun owners, and – if “safe”, they would be let back into the United States. Even as illegals, but safe ones, we would let them back in. ALL the safe ones. Who knows – maybe MOST of them would come back in. But no matter how many, let’s presume that we only let the safe ones back in. The murderers DON’T get back in.

This theoretically solves ALL of the murders on the left.

ALL OF THEM.

So why aren’t we pursuing GREEN FLAG LAWS FIRST?

Maybe because Democrat Communists don’t WANT us to solve the bigger problem. Maybe because THEIR biggest problem is actually TRUMP VOTERS – and not murders using rifles OR murders by illegals.

6. Red flag laws deprive us of the rights we are due upon arrest.

This is subtle, but it is YUGE. I mean it – this is a BIGGIE.

This is why, if there is ever a national “red flag” law, I believe that it MUST have a “voluntary arrest option“, that GIVES ME MY FULL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS *BEFORE* TAKING MY GUNS.

In fact, the ONLY red flag law that I believe will ultimately pass muster with SCOTUS, is one that allows the accused the option to say “You can detain ME, but you cannot take my guns. Not until I have seen a judge with my lawyer present.” At that point, the police enter the person into NORMAL processing, which brings the accused before a judge in a timely manner, and ALL NORMAL RIGHTS ARE GRANTED. This path is almost guaranteed to be fully Constitutional. And the DEMOCRATS are undoubtedly going to hate it, because it will turn the tables on these damnable laws, ending their abuse SWIFTLY in a flurry of expensive lawsuits against both accusers and the state.

Once your guns are taken, they are lost in the system. Once your guns are taken, the communists have control. Once you LET your guns be taken, you have WAIVED YOUR RIGHTS. We have to make these laws ACKNOWLEDGE that the SEIZURE OF ARMS is unconstitutional, but that the accused can ONLY FREELY WAIVE THEIR RIGHTS to let it happen.

OR NOT.

And if we DON’T waive our rights, then we must be granted ALL THE RIGHTS TO WHICH WE ARE ENTITLED. Otherwise known as DUE PROCESS.

Are you with me?

What I am doing is PLAYING ALONG WITH RED FLAG TO SHOVE THE POISON PILL OF DUE PROCESS DOWN ITS ERIC HOLDER CHINA DRAGON THROAT.

When we walk away with a traffic ticket, instead of being arrested, we are WAIVING OUR RIGHTS. When we pay our ticket by phone or on the internet, we are WAIVING OUR RIGHTS. And when we allow unconstitutional confiscation as a CONVENIENCE to all parties, we are WAIVING OUR RIGHTS. Everybody needs to recognize this.

Arrest in America is NOTHING LIKE arrest in China. Arrest gives us STANDING.

“I want an arress!” – speaking of our OWN arrest – may be the single most important way to STOP DEAD the communist goals of red flag laws.

What I am saying is that we need to view this BACKWARDS from the unconstitutional reasoning of the communists. We need to add an ARREST OPTION, so that red flag laws – if these horrifying things ever pass – are just as Constitutional as a traffic ticket. We need to view the immediate collection of arms without arrest as WAIVING ONE’S RIGHTS TO BOTH KEEPING THE ARMS AND ASSUMING THE RIGHTS OF THE ARRESTED.

And beyond this, THE RIGHT OF WAIVER IS THE GREATEST RIGHT OF ALL.

The right to CHOOSE to waive or not waive our rights is the ULTIMATE RIGHT. We cannot give this up, and yet most red flag laws STEAL THIS FROM US, by giving us NO OPTION to be peacefully arrested IN LIEU OF taking our guns.

The rights of the arrested – and particularly the FALSELY ARRESTED – are a GIANT HAMMER with which we can batter both RED FLAG and OUR ACCUSERS.

We must NEVER waive our rights to KEEP OUR GUNS, nor all the other rights which we are guaranteed by the Constitution.

EVER. Others may, but not this WOLF. “I WANT AN ARRESS!’

[NOTE: What I am really talking about is being “detained”, but same diff. Buckle up – it will feel every bit like an arrest. But if it’s a bad rap, you will be out QUICKLY and WITH YOUR GUNS.]

5. Red flag laws corrupt the role of the police.

This is very typical of communists. In the same way that Communists LOVE to change the ROLES and POWERS of the primary branches of the FEDERAL government, so too they love to change the roles and powers of STATE and LOCAL government.

In PORTLAND, they make the police STAND DOWN to “protect” the POLICE and not the PEOPLE.

In LOS ANGELES, they make the health department STAND DOWN to “protect” the “rights” of the homeless and not their health.

And in sanctuary cities around the nation, they make EVERYBODY stand down to protect non-citizen criminals, and not law-abiding citizens.

But conversely, communists may make police STAND UP in roles that are not actually theirs.

What communists are doing here, is making police act as “judge, jury, and executioner”, by confiscating arms before there is any proof to a DUE PROCESS that there is justification for doing so.

This is a corruption of the role of the police. This is JUST LIKE the way that communists under Obama corrupted the military and NASA, abusing their purposes instead of simply closing them down, which would be too obvious.

Worse still, this corruption leads to the NEXT problem with “red flag” laws.

4. Red flag drives a wedge between police and gun owners.

Red flag laws will not only drive a wedge between citizens and police – THEY ARE DESIGNED TO DO EXACTLY THAT.

Why? Because BOTH law enforcement AND gun owners support Trump. Because law enforcement AND gun owners typically RESPECT each other.

Red flag laws are designed to WEAKEN the bonds of respect between law enforcement and gun owners.

Red flag laws are designed to cause DIVISION between Trump supporters.

Sneaky, isn’t it?

3. Red flag laws drive a wedge between police and veterans.

Veterans will be particularly hard-hit by accusations of “unworthiness” due to the Democrat “false offering” of PTSD. Communists in the Democrat Party offered and promoted PTSD self-categorization to veterans PRECISELY so that they could eventually have their guns taken away. It was a long-term, patient plan, but it worked like crazy, and it is coming to fruition now.

I’m not saying PTSD isn’t real. Trust me. I know it’s real. But HOW that reality is integrated into society is what we are talking about. The PTSD category can be ABUSED.

MUCH propaganda has been deployed here. Watching it has been very educational.

The fact is, political leveraging of PTSD by gun-grabbing communists will create suspicions between veterans and police. Obama and Eric Holder could not be happier about this result.

And this leads to my next reason.

2. Red flag drives a wedge between doctors and patients.

Patients are already NOT being honest with their doctors about their medical status and gun ownership because of Obamacare and its sneaky socialist spying and judging. But you haven’t seen anything yet.

Under red flag laws, doctors will basically become “the enemy”. They, and their nurses and assistants, will be deprived of any information that could possibly result in a red flag complaint – once people realize that their information is not safe.

Trust me – HIPAA is BULLSHIT that is completely orthogonal to what Deep State needs to target patriots. Deep State can work around it in a heartbeat. How do I know this?

It’s DROP TIME.

I caught my doctor being used in a test run of a deep state scam against gun owners. I believe that my doctor was INNOCENT in the process – I believe they were deceived and USED. But I had some WARNING on what would happen, and was completely ready for the various steps of the process. It all happened like clockwork, exactly as predicted. It was a very beautiful scam, and will work against almost any patriot.

The key step is something that is outside of the “fake science” we are allowed to know, but that I know because of my unique background and some basic theoretical reasoning. It’s nothing “woo-woo” – it’s just been suppressed by Fake News. It’s horrifyingly real, but we were allowed to be “Eloi” for the “Morlocks”.

And the WORST PART is that this scam will sync right up with red flag laws, as I expect they are supposed to work, if we allow them to pass.

I’m not ready to go public with the details, but – well – let’s just leave it at that. I have hinted about it before, and the White Hats “have it all”. Maybe somebody else will drop the full bomb. That might cause a wee bit of scrambling, so I leave that choice to higher powers.

Fun times.

And now, the most insidious of all.

1. Red flag is designed to push Trump’s voters off social media.

This is perhaps the most profound realization I’ve had so far.

This goes straight to interfering in the 2020 election. And every election after that.

It’s bad enough that free speech is going to be stifled in real life by red flag laws. But social media? Our ONE WAY of working around the Fake News? Gun owners will FLEE.

They know this. Our enemies know this. Trump’s enemies know this.

“CHYYYNNA” knows this. They know this will kill Trump’s support online.

Which brings me to the last, EXTRA, and final reason red flag laws are a bad idea.

0. Red flag is a key part of China’s conquest of the Pacific.

By neutralizing America in the same way that they neutralized New Zealand and Australia – taking away the speech of its enemies – China will become the dominant force in the Pacific first, and the World later. Censorship of opposing viewpoints through gun laws was a way to take down opposition without firing a shot. China leveraged GUNS against SPEECH and it worked.

Well, almost.

Buckle up.

W

F5: FBI False Flag Failure Forum

GET IT IN HERE, PEOPLE.

EL PASO AND DAYTON. All related materials. Gun Control. Red Flag. Whatever.

Please feel free to REPEAT and UPDATE information from earlier threads.

BRING YOUR BEST.

Anything that proves why the FBI needs to be SAND-BLASTED WITH THE ASTEROID BELT, and the SOCIALISTS need to be chased out of Ohio with HILLARY’S BROOM.

I want to consolidate all our links, visual evidence, analysis, and reasoning.

BURN THE DIRTY FEEBS and their SOCIALIST MASTERS TO THE GROUND.

More calmly, this. It is IMPERATIVE that these incidents be made so toxic that Dems get bad dreams if they just HEAR the words “Red Flag”.

Will Red Flag laws work on SOCIALIST SHOOTERS?

Will Red Flag laws work on OHIO SATANISTS?

Will Red Flag laws work if FBI is still ABUSING INFORMANTS FOR POLITICAL DRAMA?

FLAMETHROWERS ON MAXIMUM BURN!!!

W

WE KNOW.

FFS: False Flag Syndrome

I didn’t want to call it “False Flag Sunday”, but that is what it felt like this morning, when I got up and heard the news about the shooting in Dayton.

What I want to do here is to gather into one place, our thinking about this Q-predicted series of violent attacks.

Part of me does NOT want to segregate this discussion from our normal open thread, but I’m thinking we may be close to a break in this stuff, and it will become much more clear after the afternoon reveals from LE in Dayton. A dedicated thread will help that process.

So here you are. Let’s push back on these DEMONCRAT and HOLDER FACTION narrative operations to BRAINWASH AGAINST GUNS.