Category: Vast Left Wing Conspiracy Theory

Yes, Virginia, There is a Virus

I will try to keep this brief – although that is hard, because I’m fighting against people’s “feelings” instead of facts.

When the other side LIES all the time, it creates a “feeling” that they’re lying about everything.

Yes, they ARE lying about everything – but the lies are often very sophisticated, being composed of a matrix of solid and hard-won truths, held together by crafty lies.

If you’re going to FIGHT BACK, then I say FIGHT BACK SMART.

Buckle up.

INTRO

There has been a very successful strain of disinformation used to make our side seem very unconvincing to normies (to put it mildly).

That strain is the “there is no virus” deception.

Many times we tolerate this, because we don’t want to discourage our “fellow skeptics”, but it is critical that we refute nonsense on our own side.

In the past I’ve devoted occasional comments to putting down disinformation to the tune of “there is no virus” and “the virus was never isolated”, but after this last time, meaning yesterday, I’ve decided to just GUT this beast right on the dissection table, under the glaring lights of its own post, so that the “debunking” has its own URL, suitable for posting in response to well-meaning people on our side, who think “no virus” is a tenable position.

NO. It is not tenable. You are being BAITED into nonsense, so that you are no longer effective. You are being baited into becoming a “FEELZ” person, like reliable Democrats.

The “there is no virus” position is basically the “new flat earth” of biology. You’ll see why momentarily.

An Example of “There Is No Virus / Isolation”

I want to thank Canadian Guest for bringing an example of this disinformation to the board for my consideration. Bringing some FRESH RATS to this SCIENCE HAWK is always appreciated.

This is why I don’t restrict the bringing of “propaganda” and potential disinformation here. We’re adults. We can DEAL with it – and often very usefully. I get more truth out of Russian “propaganda” than out of most MSM “explainers”. Funny how that works.

WE will be the judge of truth – NOT “them”.

Here is the video. Watch if you want – particularly after reading this.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aRUYydaFRlYQ/

There are some tells OTHER than what I’m going to talk about, that this is an interesting construction designed to derail critics of the vaccines. Tell me what you think “smells” like targeted disinformation in the comments.

Did CIA or FIB make this? Did Chinese intelligence? Who are these people?

Koch’s Postulates

One of the centerpieces of “disproving” that viruses exist, is to engage in passive-aggressive science using what are called “Koch’s postulates”.

Koch’s postulates were a brilliant set of standards from the beginning of microbiology, designed to help prove that an illness was actually caused by a microbe, rather than a bodily dysfunction of some kind.

  1. The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms.
  2. The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.
  3. The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism.
  4. The microorganism must be reisolated from the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent.

Wikipedia has an excellent and quick presentation about Koch’s postulates AND the problems therein.

LINK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch%27s_postulates

You can see a slideshow which explains Koch’s Postulates HERE:

LINK: https://www.slideserve.com/chione/koch-s-postulates

You would be very smart to notice something on the LAST slide.

“It is sometimes impossible to satisfy all of Koch’s postulates.”

One of the ways in which this happens, is that “pure culture” (stated in the second postulate) varies between a laboratory vacuum and a jungle floor. If you’re a “purist”, nothing will pass the postulates. If you’re laissez-faire about things, everything will pass. If you’re SMART about things, and demand a SMARTLY PURE culture, you will get great results, and Koch’s postulates will continue to work for even crazy things like viruses, prions, etc.

What’s up with viruses?

The problem is that viruses are not microbes in the same sense as bacteria, protozoans, and similar microorganisms which are well-handled by Koch’s original postulates, where “pure cultures” were “biologically sterile, but molecularly fertile” mixtures.

Viruses are, quite literally, molecular parasites. The transmission of viruses is both more demanding and less demanding on the nature of a “pure medium”, than is transmission of bacteria. Viruses transmit in a different way.

Viruses need almost nothing to survive in, but they need CELLS to reproduce in. Viruses do not grow in simple chemical brews. They need CELLS. Cells not only contain a lot of stuff of “their own” – they also contain a lot of viruses, AND the encoding for these and other viruses.

If you demand a “cell-free medium” for growth of a virus, you have basically sabotaged science “under the color of science”.

See how that works?

The history of Koch’s postulates, and the upgrading of Koch’s original postulates to take care of things like viruses, prions, etc., is discussed in THIS article:

NIH Summary: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC172879/

PDF of Article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC172879/pdf/090018.pdf

SO – you will almost always see some kind of reference to Koch’s postulates, in “there is no virus” disinformation. Koch’s postulates are the perfect “medium” for passive-aggressive anti-science.

BUT WAIT! There’s MOAR!

“BUT MUH NON-ISOLATION!”

The next, and actually essential part of the disinformation, is the allegation that the virus behind COVID-19 was never isolated.

HOGWASH!

BULLSHIT!

LIES!

It was not only isolated early and often – it is ROUTINELY isolated, all over the world, in order that genetic studies OF THE VIRUS can be done.

Think of all the hundreds of thousands of scientists who gather “clout” in molecular biology by analyzing the RNA of a single virus, and thereby look for small changes in that RNA – meaning a few nitrogenous bases among hundreds of thousands. How do they “isolate” the RNA of the virus from samples taken from people? How do they NOT get a bunch of human nasal RNA, plus the RNA of all our OTHER embedded viruses, AND nasal bacteria, mixed up in the sample, screwing up the results?

It’s simple. They GROW THE VIRUS in a NONINFECTED cellular medium that LOVES the virus. They filter and separate the budding and “transmitting” virus from the cells. And then they check the RNA of the filtered virus.

WHICH LOOKS LIKE THIS!

“Pictures or it didn’t happen.”

You can even see the damn spikes! Of course, they didn’t really need to do this – the RNA is the real convincer – the FINGERPRINT – but a picture is helpful for the doubters.

Sure sounds like “isolation” to me!

One of the best ways to demonstrate this to you, is to simply READ YOU THE PAPER where the pictures came from – back in the early days of COVID-19.

This paper was “e-published” back in March of 2020, when “Wuhan Coronavirus” had just been renamed to “SARS-CoV-2” because of China and Democrats (more on that later). The paper was actually received in February, around the time I was recovering from the original Wuhan strain of COVID-19, or something immediately descended from it.

This is from a Japanese group located in Tokyo. This is not by any means the earliest research on SARS-CoV-2 virus. It’s an IMPROVEMENT paper. These guys are saying “Hey! It’s easier to isolate this damn virus using OUR new method!”

Here is a text version of the paper, emphasizing the abstract.

Enhanced isolation of SARS-CoV-2 by TMPRSS2-expressing cells

Shutoku Matsuyama matuyama@nih.go.jp, Naganori Nao, Kazuya Shirato, +14 , Miyuki Kawase, Shinji Saito, Ikuyo Takayama, Noriyo Nagata, Tsuyoshi Sekizuka https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1302-5472, Hiroshi Katoh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8613-4717, Fumihiro Kato, Masafumi Sakata, Maino Tahara, Satoshi Kutsuna, Norio Ohmagari, Makoto Kuroda https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0487-4405, Tadaki Suzuki https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-9542, Tsutomu Kageyama, and Makoto Takeda https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-7727 matuyama@nih.go.jp-14Authors Info & Affiliations

Edited by Yuan Chang, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, and approved March 5, 2020 (received for review February 11, 2020)

March 12, 2020

117 (13) 7001-7003

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002589117

Abstract

A novel betacoronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which caused a large respiratory outbreak in Wuhan, China in December 2019, is currently spreading across many countries globally. Here, we show that a TMPRSS2-expressing VeroE6 cell line is highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, making it useful for isolating and propagating SARS-CoV-2. Our results reveal that, in common with SARS- and Middle East respiratory syndrome-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 infection is enhanced by TMPRSS2.

As a bit of an aside, you will note that the editor is a Chinese researcher at an American university. The CCP has no problem pushing on the “social” buttons of American science, AND IT DOES. There was no way that the name “Wuhan coronavirus” was going to last. Think about it. This is subtle, but it’s the way things are now.

There are some nice graphics in the paper, too, including pictures of the virus.

(A) Expression of TMPRSS2 in total cellular RNA (0.2 µg) of indicated cells was compared with that in human lung RNA (catalog no. 636524; Clontech) by quantitative real-time PCR. ND, not detectable. (B) SARS-CoV-2–infected VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells. Cell rounding (black arrows) and syncytium formation (white arrows) (C). Electron micrograph showing isolated virus particles with negative staining. (Scale bar, 200 nm.) (D) Viral RNA multiplication in various cells at 48 h postinoculation with the viral specimen, as determined by real-time RT-PCR using E and N primer/probe sets (9). Cq, quantitation cycle. (E) Real-time RT-PCR amplification plot using the E primer/probe set, corresponding to the data in C. RFU, relative fluorescence units. (F) Comparison of cell susceptibility to the isolated virus, detected with a patient’s serum and Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-human IgG. Nuclei were stained with DAPI.

It is EXTREMELY helpful to simply READ what the authors say, in recounting what they did.

I’ve put in BOLD what they DID.

Seven clinical specimens (throat swabs or sputum) obtained from seven SARS-CoV-2 infection cases were inoculated into VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells, which were monitored daily for cytopathic effect (CPE). These clinical specimens were deidentified prior to use, and this study was approved by the ethics committee of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan (approval no. 1091). Informed consent was obtained from all participants, from which the subjects were obtained, or their legally acceptable representatives for sample donation. In five cases among the seven, clear CPE with detachment/floating (black arrows, Fig. 1B) and syncytium formation (white arrows, Fig. 1B) developed at 2 or 3 d postinfection (p.i.) (Table 1). The virus titers in culture supernatants of the five cases at 3 d p.i. were 4.6 × 106 to 6.8 × 107 median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) per mL (Table 1). Typical coronavirus particles were detected by electron microscopy (Fig. 1C). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of case Wk-521 detected the nearly full-length genome sequence from SARS-CoV-2 with >99.9% homology (1, 2) (GISAID database ID EPI_ISL_408667). Unexpectedly, the NGS data showed contaminated mycoplasma sequences (Mycoplasma hyorhinis and Mycoplasma arginini) from VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells. CPE in VeroE6 cells persistently infected with SARS-CoV was enhanced by infection with Mycoplasma fermentans (8), but whether a similar situation exists for SARS-CoV-2–related CPE in this cell line is unclear.

The viral RNA copies in the clinical specimens used for virus isolation were estimated by real-time RT-PCR (9, 10). As expected, viral RNA copies in the clinical specimens in which CPE developed within 2 d p.i. were greater than those in the other specimens (Table 1).

VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells are superior to other cell lines tested in this study for SARS-CoV-2 isolation. Consistent with previous reports (2, 4), the amount of SARS-CoV-2 RNAs in the culture supernatants of Vero, Calu-3, and A549 cells 48 h p.i. was low and was measurably higher when VeroE6 cells were used. However, the viral RNA copies in the VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cell culture supernatants were >100 times greater than those from VeroE6 cells (Fig. 1 D and E). Data for SARS-CoV show that TMPRSS2 enhances its entry efficiency (5, 11). VeroE6 and VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were infected with 10-fold serially diluted SARS-CoV-2 samples, and the infected cells were visualized by indirect immunofluorescent assays (Fig. 1E). The results showed that VeroE6/TMPRSS2 displayed ∼10-fold greater number of SARS-CoV-2–infected cells than the parental VeroE6 cells. These data suggest that, in common with SARS-CoV, TMPRSS2 may also play an important role in SARS-CoV-2 cell entry.

Pay special attention to THIS PART which is not highlighted above, but which shows the level of ATTENTION that was paid to the results.

Unexpectedly, the NGS data showed contaminated mycoplasma sequences (Mycoplasma hyorhinis and Mycoplasma arginini) from VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells. CPE in VeroE6 cells persistently infected with SARS-CoV was enhanced by infection with Mycoplasma fermentans (8), but whether a similar situation exists for SARS-CoV-2–related CPE in this cell line is unclear.

See what I was talking about with a “pure medium”? These mycoplama are very common contaminants of cell cultures. Note that these scientists are not HIDING the presence of contaminants in their “pure” medium. On the contrary, they’re saying they spotted the contamination, and are accounting for it.

The bottom line is that these people know exactly what they are doing, dealing with the tricky nature of Koch’s postulates under the realities of working with viruses – some of the hardest biology that can be done.

And THAT brings me to a personal observation.

On Difficult Technology

Science is a game that everybody CAN play, and I would go so far as to say it’s a game that everybody SHOULD play. You should be teaching your kids science and art, in exactly the way you should teach them football, baseball, and ice skating.

And just like with PROFESSIONAL SPORTS, in which people who you respect make errors that you call out, it helps to RESPECT the pros of science – EVEN AS YOU POINT OUT THEIR ERRORS, WHICH YOU SHOULD.

We don’t believe professional athletes are “always right” – why should you believe the same things about scientists?

Back in my laboratory days, I had a couple of “lucky insights” connected by a lot of hard work, and they demonstrate how science gets past obstacles, including in particular other scientists.

Dissatisfied with my seemingly unexciting assigned research project, I was in the perfect mood when a colleague of mine drew something very interesting on the blackboard with a big chalk “X” through it.

“Why doesn’t this work?” was my question.

My colleague gave a reason that didn’t seem right to me, and then stated that he was abandoning that project. I asked if he minded if I tried it. He didn’t mind – he had already gotten a new assignment from our boss.

I picked up the gauntlet, and got things to work the very first time. The big chalk “X” was wrong. My insight was correct.

Happy that the abandoned research project was back in play, our boss allowed me to take it over and pursue it.

Pushing the idea through on a small scale, I actually got the entire project to work – but not to the satisfaction of skeptics. We didn’t have “clincher” proof. We needed to scale up to get that level of proof.

Scaling it up, however, failed. It took a lot of very interesting science to understand the whole process, and scale it up to the level that was necessary to convince the skeptics.

The problem was, not ALL of the skeptics were convinced. One skeptic, at the last minute, needed proof that would require even MORE scaling up.

The problem THERE is that NOT EVERYBODY could do the work.

When others could not duplicate my results, I was forced to do the even bigger scale-up myself, AND to do it under intense scrutiny, to figure out why *I* could do it and others could not.

The result was obvious proof that I had gotten it to work. The skeptic’s harassment had led to a magnificent NEW proof that neither we nor the skeptic had fully predicted. We had exceeded the level of proof that the skeptic demanded.

HOWEVER, this left open a subject that nobody really wanted to talk about.

Why weren’t others able to duplicate my results?

The sad fact is, science is filled with people who do not practice the habits necessary for success. They are not PERSISTENT when they need to be. They are not INSIGHTFUL in trying to get around problems. Even more importantly, they are not HOPEFUL that they CAN get around problems. This failure to have hope in overcoming obstacles is a HUGE problem in science. But likewise, many are not sufficiently DUBIOUS in trying to spot thousands of small potential problems, and doing what is necessary to prevent them. We have to be SKEPTICAL, too.

Even when we’re skeptical, sometimes we’re not skeptical enough. An excellent example is provided by the tragic death of Karen Wetterhahn, who died of dimethylmercury poisoning, when a few droplets of dimethylmercury splashed on and penetrated one of the thin latex gloves she was wearing. This was the level of protection recommended at the time, but it was not enough.

Karen had protected her coworkers by doing the work herself, instead of exposing THEM to the danger. She did the work “to code”, but it was still not enough. Part of her legacy is the habit of scientists in later years to use two or even three layers of gloves, when handling dangerously toxic and reactive substances. Many will use “one more than recommended” of just about any safety measure.

We have to LEARN and RETAIN thousands and thousands of such habits just to do some of the simplest scientific operations, like weighing out a substance properly.

The boss who I mentioned above loved to say “All the easy stuff has been done.” It’s SO true, even though it’s obviously an exaggeration. That is why there are amazing recent discoveries – every once in a while – of things that COULD have been discovered many years prior, and which were simply missed or overlooked. But for the most part, it’s true. Almost all of the easy and obvious stuff has been done.

So what is my point?

The point is, science is HARD – and yet you are allowed to criticize it – AND YOU SHOULD.

The trick is, criticizing it and BEING RIGHT. And you do NOT have to be an “expert”, or even a scientist, to be right.

But you may have to be persistent, insightful, hopeful, and skeptical.

W

Omicron Ground Reports – What’s Your Story?

Now that the COVID psy-op is falling apart, and we are fully resistant, we’ve overcome the COVID psy-op (GOOD), and we’ve been battling elsewhere (GOOD), but we may have lost some of our razor-sharp focus on, and ass-covering knowledge of, how to deal with COVID, and to thereby not go down for the count when COVID comes our way (BAD) .

Two recent comments by Scott and Aubergine show that COVID is still circulating, and that we are surviving without the vaccines, thank you kindly, “Dr.” Fauci.

The deal is, Omicron is still out there. In fact, so is Delta.

https://nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/global/6m

You can see that Omicron is everywhere around the world, vaccinating people against Delta, but Delta and its “old school buddies” still persist in small measure.

SO – I want to help give everybody a BOOSTER of several things:

  • information
  • preventative knowledge
  • courage
  • resistance to psy-ops

Please put your most recent COVID observations and experiences HERE, so that they can be found easily in the future, for historical reference, AND so that you can share your experiences, thoughts, strategies, and tactics with your fellow QTreepers.

Likewise, if you have questions, curiosities, and concerns about COVID, this is an excellent place to get some replies.

Thanks!

W

Vaccine Addiction Slavery Confirmed by Canadian Data

Introduction

You may remember this post (more below) from about a year ago:

How Vaccine Addiction Slavery Works

At that time, I introduced a general concept of vaccine-consequential medical dependence upon vaccines, which I called “vaccine addiction slavery“. I was explaining how spike protein-based vaccines for COVID-19 might in fact become literally addictive like barbiturates – meaning fatally so upon withdrawal.

Barbiturates are very old sleeping pills. They work remarkably well – better than opiates – except for one problem. They are even more addictive than opiates.

If you abruptly stop taking barbiturates once addicted – you die. And they are terribly difficult to withdraw from, slowly. This would be the same thing for the COVID vaccines. Stop taking them, and you die. You would have to KEEP taking them to live.

Keep this in mind. Barbiturates were “old tech”. They were EARLY tech. It took DECADES to find more modern sleeping pills that are less addictive, but still problematic (e.g., benzodiazepines). This technological history is COMPLETELY ANALOGOUS to COVID vaccines, in my opinion. It’s also similar to antibiotics. Remember MERCURY as an antibiotic?

I remember.

In all of these cases – antibiotics, sleeping pills and COVID vaccines – you NOT ONLY don’t want to take these things continuously – you especially don’t want to take the early ones, that are basically poisons of one kind or another.

So how is addiction to a vaccine possible?

The idea is, that if you get “hooked” on vaccines which show certain immunological deficiencies, relative to an evolving disease – meaning they can’t keep up AND they leave you worse off than natural immunity – then you cannot quit the vaccines under pain of death from the disease. You would become locked in a battle of vaccine manufacturers vs. the virus, dependent upon THEIR ability to stay ahead of the evolution of the virus, and the government’s willingness to give you the shot. If you don’t get the vaccine – or don’t get it on time – your vaccine-trashed immunity fails, and you die.

Obviously communists and globalists would LOVE this situation. You don’t comply? You’re gonna die.

On top of THAT, the vaccines themselves would eventually kill you, just like heroin or fentanyl.

Here is that old post.

How Vaccine Addiction Slavery Works

Wherein we explain – at three different levels of scientific and political understanding – how ADE-mediated vaccine slavery works. This post is to PREPARE YOU to watch what the other side is doing RIGHT NOW, so you can spot the deceptions. Right now they are DESPERATELY trying to make a FAILING PLAN work. Their plan …

If you didn’t read that old post, and you got vaccinated, you may be silently freaking out just a bit at this point. Hopefully you already got Omicron. THAT is the real vaccine. A quality vaccine. A NATURAL vaccine, although “upgraded” a bit by somebody. So you can calm down just a bit, if you got Omicron, and have begun to bushwhack your way back to natural immunity.

You’re not gonna die – as long as you STAY OFF THE DAMN VACCINES.

I will explain why in a moment.

But here is the big message.

There has been growing PROOF that the vaccines have the properties necessary for vaccine addiction. And now, there is PROOF of such addiction IN REALITY – from Canada.

I’m not NECESSARILY saying that Mafia daughter Nancy Pelosi and dubious East-coast Italian liar Anthony Fauci might take a mafia trick into government, and upgrade the heroin business to a world-wide scale, using a medical and government mafia, and go after ALL people instead of just black people, but……

Yeah. It is what it is.

So wait a minute – is this actually real?

WAIT FOR THE SCIENCE – and then you can decide.

The Canadian Data

Valerie Curren, in a comment today, just brought THIS Gab post, about a new Alex Berenson article, to my attention.

Vicki McKenna

@VickiMcKenna

·

Canadian data show vaccines now RAISE the risk of death from Covid

“Vaccinated people are now more likely to be hospitalized or die from Covid, even after adjusting for fact they’re older than the unvaccinated, according to official government estimates” 

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/stunning-official-canadian-data-show/comments?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Please read his article. It’s short and very readable.

Here was my immediate response to the article, after reading it.

OMG – this is exactly what I warned about! Vaccine addiction slavery!

How Vaccine Addiction Slavery Works

THIS right here is the key!!!

In May, the most recent month for which figures are available, only 9 percent of Covid deaths and 14 percent of hospital admissions in Manitoba occurred among unvaccinated people, even though they are 17 percent of the population.

Manitoba, which has about 1.4 million residents, also provides figures that are adjusted for the fact that vaccinated and boosted people tend to be older.

Those show that in May, vaccinated but unboosted people were about 50 percent more likely to be hospitalized or die of Covid than unvaccinated people. People who had received boosters had roughly the same risk of hospitalization or death as the unvaccinated.

Once you’re hooked on the vaccines, instead of the virus, you start to run a higher risk that you will DIE from the disease unless you get and stay boosted – but the vaccines will ALSO kill you by their own effects.

It’s a DOUBLY INSIDIOUS fate. It’s just like heroin addiction. The “cure” of more product will kill you on its own, AND it keeps you locked in.

(End of comment)

That right there is the short version. We now have a very nice example – corrected for numbers – corrected for age – that shows people “needing” to be either boosted or unvaccinated to not die of COVID at the “maximum rate”, which rate happens if you are “addicted to the jabs but late on payments”.

This is EXACTLY what I predicted would happen. And don’t even think about the vaccine being “safer” than being unvaccinated. The scientific trickery that was used to try to hide vaccine deaths has been appalling to this here scientist. The longer you take ANY vaccine which puts spike protein into your bloodstream, the greater your risk of “sudden adult death syndrome”.

You have a choice. Small, periodic, immunity-granting “colds”, or much more frequent vaccines that are guaranteed to put spike protein in your blood twice a year. And if you’re a WOMAN on that vaccine schedule, congratulations – you will likely never get a pregnancy that lasts to term.

It’s a small effect now – 50% greater chance of death on a disease that doesn’t kill many in most age groups – but I will bet money that there is a nice upward delta with the number of vaccinations, just like with the length of time one takes barbiturates.

First new scientific prediction: the longer you are addicted to the COVID vaccines, the greater the chance of death if you get the disease (i.e., the penalty for withdrawal increases with time).

Second new scientific prediction: the penalty for “withdrawal” increases with age (meaning seniors are at the most risk from withdrawal).

Third new scientific prediction: vaccinated kids (who survive the cardiac effects of the spike protein) are fully addicted by adulthood.

Ah, this crime is so smooth, one almost has to think that “this ain’t their first rodeo”. They had to have seen this in animal studies, and kept it under wraps.

Seriously. There had to be animal studies of corona viruses AND corona virus vaccines that showed potential for “depopulation” – both lowering lifespan AND reducing fertility.

And then somebody got ideas.

EVIL.

So what is the mechanism by which this happens? The fact of the matter is that we on the “outside” in “Fake Science” are learning as fast as we can. There are two main effects that we know about, from prior science, which seem relevant – ADE and OAS.

ADE

One effect behind a vaccine “making a disease worse” is called “antibody dependent enhancement”, or ADE for short. We can generalize that even further, to include other mechanisms than just the antibodies of “classic” ADE, by including anything that might be called “vaccine-dependent enhancement”, whether it involves antibodies or not. But for simplicity, let’s just call it all “ADE”.

Classic ADE involves a vaccine’s creation of what can be called “inappropriate antibodies”, which are problematic when the disease strikes later. Vaccination creates antibodies, and for whatever reason, those antibodies are not helpful when the disease strikes, but may actually make the situation WORSE, through various sins of omission or commission.

Now, we can expand that just a bit, to include other vaccine effects that make the disease worse, when one gets it. One such effect which appears relevant for COVID vaccines is a general DECREASE in immunity toward ALL DISEASES. This may be mediated though the interferon system.

There is still a lot of debate as to, and study of, what is going on in the weeks after COVID vaccination, but even the Faucists admit that immunity toward COVID itself is DECREASED immediately after injection, and does not rise to positive for a period of days to low weeks. (This, by the way, turned out to be a great excuse for ignoring vaccine side effects.) THEN, after specific immunity to COVID stays positive for a period of long weeks to low months, it tapers off, and people “need” boosters to maintain immunity toward COVID.

Meanwhile, during that entire time, general immunity is lowered toward EVERYTHING in many people, and does not recover for long weeks to months.

How this situation can possibly be regarded as good, mostly involves Anthony Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis”, which keeps us from seeing the bigger picture.

Dr. Nathan Thompson was one of the first to disclose loss of general immune function after COVID vaccination, and the powers that be, came after him HARD. His video disappeared everywhere.

Here are several posts where I covered such topics.

Don’t Drink The Kool-ADE

Since Fauci and Pfizer Must Have Known the Jab Reduces Immunity, Was This Also Fauci’s Goal With an AIDS Vaccine?

Ten Fresh Reasons for You, Your Friends, and Your Loved Ones to NOT Get the HAXXINE

“Clot Shot” Needs An Information Warfare Upgrade – What Do We Call The Immune-System-Destroying Shot Now?

But before looking at those fascinating posts, let’s deal with OAS.

OAS

OAS stands for “original antigenic sin”. This is not actually a hard concept to understand. It is a cute way of saying that while our immune systems are designed to IMPRINT on whatever they were last exposed to, as they figure out an immune response, they ESPECIALLY tend to imprint on new things that they are FIRST exposed to. Therefore, if your immune system imprints on something WRONGLY or MISLEADINGLY the first time, that “sin” is carried on.

In some ways, OAS is the flip side of ADE. Two sides of the same coin. ADE blames the bad antibodies coming back to haunt. OAS blames the setting up of the bad antibodies. Almost the same thing, and often indicted in the same breath.

OAS is another way of viewing the failure of immunity to deal with evolving viruses. Relative to the new virus, the memory of the old virus is “sinful”.

OAS is likewise another way of viewing autoimmune disorders, where we accidentally (or intentionally, in the case of sterilization vaccines) create immunity toward something in our own bodies. The original sin of an inappropriate immunity carries on to cause later problems.

Booster Withdrawal Syndrome

So how do we view the Canadian results in terms of ADE and OAS?

In my opinion, the spike protein vaccines have a “narrowing” effect on immunity, which is the source of their OAS / ADE. They are overly focused on the spike protein, and in particular on the original Wuhan variant spike protein. The antibodies that are created and on duty are basically born as “yesterday’s news”, and not even much of that. “Yesterday’s local suburban news” is what those antibodies are.

Worse still, unlike natural, disease-conferred immunity, there is no immunity gained toward OTHER proteins created by the virus. Those MORE CONSERVED proteins are the ones where antibodies to ONE variant are GOOD AGAINST THE NEXT. Those critical antibodies are NOT created by exposure to the spike protein alone.

Score 1 for natural immunity – score 0 for simplistic spike protein vaccines.

Thus, because the vaccinee’s immune system is over-focused on an old spike protein and nothing else, it becomes worthless against new variants, no matter in what way the rapidly evolving spike proteins have changed. Worse, the immune system doesn’t “start over” and produce general antibodies to the unknown new threat – it keeps throwing the wrong specific ammo at the new virus. Worse still, only a RECENTLY BOOSTED (but not TOO recently booosted) immune system has competent immunity. A vaccinated but non-boosted individual is “running on empty” – and with the wrong kind of gasoline. They have low immunity, and what they have is wrong.

In other words, you’d better have a FRESH DOSE of the BAD VACCINE, once you start taking the bad vaccine. Either that, or stick with natural immunity.

Starting to think that the vaccine might not be a good idea? Read on.

What About Novavax?

I had high hopes for the protein-based Novavax vaccine. Sadly, THAT was before I understood that spike protein pathogenicity dooms these vaccines. Robert Malone actually tried to warn FDA about the problems of building a vaccination program on the spike protein. His efforts were rebuffed.

Steve Kirsch has a great take on the Novavax vaccine.

Should you get the Novavax vaccine?

Absolutely not! Here are my top 5 reasons why you shouldn’t.

  1. COVID is a disease which is easily treatable. Why would you take a risk on a new product with unknown risks when you don’t need to?
  2. As Andrew Wakefield and others point out, we’ve never had a vaccine [presumably meaning a COVID vaccine] where the benefits > outweigh the risk. While this might be the first one, you’ll want to wait for an independent study that proves it.
  3. You can’t trust the FDA, CDC, or drug companies. They have to come clean and admit their issues before we can ever trust them again.
  4. You run the risk of original antigenic sin (OAS) and/or antibody dependent enhancement (ADE). In short, you run the risk of making yourself worse off.
  5. We just don’t know. We don’t know anything about their adjuvant — Matrix M. We don’t know anything about safety. We don’t know if they can manufacture it properly (they are now on their third contract manufacturer).

Steve has three additional links which are fantastic reads. They explain FROM THE DATA exactly why Novavax is both low in benefits and high in risks. This is CLEARLY due to the pathogenic spike protein.

In my opinion, it’s very unlikely that a COVID vaccine which beats disease-conferred immunity will be available for YEARS. Sure, I’ll keep watching, but Novavax is almost certainly not it.

So why did I want Novavax to be approved?

FDA and Pfizer/China Throw Shade on Novavax to Keep Data on Safer Vaccines Out of VAERS

TL;DR – “I believe that mRNA vaccines have serious risks that would be REVEALED by approval of the Novavax vaccine.” –Wolf Moon I’m actually surprised that FDA and Pfizer/China allowed Novavax to get this close to approval, but they clearly have the upcoming vote RIGGED, just like the 2020 election. The trusty “board mules” that …

FDA Panel Recommends EUA Approval for Novavax Vaccine

In my opinion, the approval of a “likely safer” coronavirus vaccine is – in the long game – a big win for popular science – here’s why. The approaching approval (or not) of a competing EUA for the NON-mRNA NON-viral-vector NON-genetic Novavax coronavirus vaccine is going to tell us a LOT about how much power …

I wanted Novavax approved, not only because it was “safer”, but so that “popular science” would be able to get the data for Novavax out of VAERS, after which we can compare it with mRNA vaccines. This will give us powerful estimates on the “price” of the industry misleading us away from the safest possible vaccines, to ones that they preferred for research reasons.

Novavax still has to get past the CDC, and I would not put it past “Rochelle The Knife” Walensky to kill Novavax, but as I have explained elsewhere, I do think that Novavax has made implicit promises not to brag up their (somewhat) better safety relative to mRNA vaccines. They will HANG TOGETHER to make sure they don’t hang separately.

Bottom Line

The bottom line is this. DO NOT GET THE JAB. There are too many reasons right now to skip the jab and to rely on natural immunity.

If I change my mind on that, you will be the first to know, and also the first to know WHY.

W

John Fink and James Coburn discuss case in a scene from the film ‘The Carey Treatment’, 1972. (Photo by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Getty Images)

Why Did DeSantis Strongly Oppose FDA on Child mRNA COVID Vaccines? He Probably Saw This Video

I had already seen the video I’m about to show you, when I watched the press conference in which Florida Governor Ron DeSantis powerfully chastised the media for mischaracterizing his administration’s position of OPPOSING the mRNA vaccines for kids, as PROHIBITING the vaccines for kids – something which DeSantis reminded the idiot media that he cannot do.

However, DeSantis didn’t “hide” his opposition in the least. He still seemed to be doing everything in his power to get parents to look at Pfizer’s clinical trial data (or lack thereof) allegedly justifying this needless – if not counterproductive – if not downright dangerous vaccine.

Thus, when I saw how STRONGLY DeSantis held his ground, I thanked God that somebody in his administration surely saw the same video that I had seen.

YOU NEED TO SEE IT, TOO.

Just watch this. It’s short and to the point.

BOMBSHELL: Dr. Clare Craig Exposes How Pfizer Twisted Their Clinical Trial Data for Young Children

Chief Nerd Published June 17, 2022 103,562 Views

LINK: https://rumble.com/v18s66i-bombshell-dr.-clare-craig-exposes-how-pfizer-twisted-their-clinical-trial-d.html

Here is the Ron DeSantis press conference.

In my opinion, it’s very clear that he and/or his people watched this video, or read a transcript.

DeSantis: ‘No Proven Benefit’ For Babies To Get COVID Jabs, ‘We Recommend Against It’

DeSantis said that Florida will not require infants to receive COVID-19 vaccines, and stressed that his government recommends against it

By Andrew White

Published 10 hours ago

LINK: https://valiantnews.com/2022/06/desantis-no-proven-benefit-for-babies-to-get-covid-jabs-we-recommend-against-it/

Twitter will try to remove this tweet from the historical record, so let’s just make a copy.

In my opinion, this Pfizer clinical trial is nearly 100% BAD SCIENCE.

That such bad science is not merely allowed to pass without comment by America’s major scientific organizations, such as the AMA and the ACS, but was in fact used by the FDA to approve utterly needless vaccines – this kind of failure of American science is SOUL-DEADENING.

It’s not just one person here or a research group there. This is multiplicity of large-group institutional failure.

Personally, I blame this shocking failure on the triumph of Chinese ethics over traditional Western ethics.

Pfizer, with its global HQ for clinical trial data in Wuhan (SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE!) is now allowing China and the CCP to effectively run all its clinical trials. This horrible, shoddy trial just REEKS of a sick combination of malignant Chinese battered anarcho-capitalism and corrupt Chinese communism. This is typical “top down” forcing of mistakes due to POLITICS and GREED.

I have been telling people that I will NEVER take another drug from Pfizer.

THIS is exactly why.

W

Truth Social and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny – a Lesson in Dealing with “Disinformation”

I will try to keep this short.

I was very shocked, recently, to find that Dr. Sherry Tenpenny was banned from Truth Social for calling the mRNA COVID vaccines “bioweapons”.

Dr. Tenpenny commented back.

Let’s take a closer look at that!

I can tell you this – by the time I saw this, Dr. Tenpenny had been reinstated on Truth Social. I’m not sure what went on behind the scenes, but within hours, she was back on.

THIS may have had something to do with it.

https://freedomfirstnetwork.com/2022/06/donald-trumps-truth-social-bans-dr-sherri-tenpenny-heres-the-reason-why

LINK: https://rumble.com/v17mxf5-donald-trumps-truth-social-permanently-suspends-dr-sherri-tenpenny-heres-wh.html

Then later…..

https://freedomfirstnetwork.com/2022/06/dr-tenpenny-responds-to-suspension-so-much-for-truth-social-and-free-speech

LINK: https://freedomfirstnetwork.com/2022/06/dr-tenpenny-responds-to-suspension-so-much-for-truth-social-and-free-speech

Here was Dr. Tenpenny’s comment back to Jeff Dornik.

@jeffdornik – We had developed just shy of 5000 followers in six weeks on TS.

We had about 300 posts on a variety of subjects:
Jabs, WEF, Gates, VAERS, Faith-based content, 2A, food supply, Agenda 2030, Biden’s dark winter, Klaus Schwab, the WHO treaty, pro-life issues … & the list goes on!

PodBean did the same thing last fall – wiped my account of great interviews just as we passed 1M downloads in 8 months.
Honestly – other people that now have >25M+ downloads on Podbean were untouched.

So much for Truth Social and free speech.

“When you tear out a man’s tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you’re only telling the world that you fear what he might say.” #TruthSocial#FreeSpeech#Podbean

Sherry Tenpenny, Gab Social, June 7, 2022

As I said, by the time I got on Truth Social to confirm, a few hours later, Dr. Tenpenny’s account had already been restored.

Here was a comment I made later, on her account.

Wolf Moon

@WOLFM00N·

Replying to @busydrt

Amen!

Very happy that you’re back – otherwise I would have left this place as not having free speech.

I’m a scientist who agrees with much of what you write, but I disagree on some things. That is small potatoes. Scientists disagree.

Here’s a gift argument.

IF a virus is created as part of bioweapons research, how can a vaccine for it NOT also be a bioweapon? It must be. Current vaccines are ALWAYS a limited case of the disease itself.

C19+vax has a “fait accompli” military strategy.

My point there is that EVEN if one throws out the very likely agenda of vaccines as a population control mechanism (contraceptive and sterilizing vaccines being a well-known area of modern science), and even if we throw out doctrines of Chinese “total warfare” and China’s deep involvement in the mRNA vaccines (China is now trusted to run ALL of Pfizer’s clinical trials), we are still left with the reality that vaccines for a disease which is “possibly to likely” a gain-of-function bioweapon or bioweapon test, simply cannot ever lose that nature.

Vaccines are a devil’s deal with SOME weakened form of a disease. DEAL WITH IT.

They’re a damn bioweapon. Dialed down, but clearly not enough yet.

I just checked – Dr. Tenpenny is still back on Truth Social, and was posting last night (Friday, June 10, 2022).

Here is my perspective on this.

Dr. Tenpenny is labeled by the leftists as one of the “Dirty Dozen” – top spreaders of “disinformation” about vaccines.

LINK: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56536390

In my personal opinion, yes, she does spread disinformation, but she also spreads valuable information that the mainstream media suppresses. And EVEN her “disinformation” often has either grains of suppressed TRUTH in it – OR (and this is very important) allows me to see how our intelligence agencies SET HER (and us) UP with the disinformation, as ILLEGAL ACTS OF DISCREDITATION against American citizens.

More on that in a moment.

Do you, patriots, want to suppress information about the crimes of the left? I don’t think so.

Dr. Tenpenny and her friends were maliciously set up with phony “information” about several things, which I have covered on this blog.

  • vaccine magnetism
  • suramin (a synthetic drug) in pine needles and star anise
  • pine needle tea (a natural abortifacient) as a ‘cure’ for the obviously abortifacient coronavirus vaccines

The first was a rather cunning viral discreditation of vaccine critics. I did my own experiments to prove that this was essentially a parlor trick using skin oils, surface tension, and psychology, designed to fool people into believing that magnets are sticking to injection sites.

The second was a sadly effective demonstration of the idea that our side often doesn’t fact check the most basic drug information.

The third was an amazingly cynical way to not only get Dr. Tenpenny and her colleagues to destroy their own reputations by advocating a known abortifacient to people fearful of abortion, but to get those very same abortion opponents to self-abort.

Seriously, the people who come up with that kind of deception are truly evil.

Here is my prior coverage of these topics.

Vaccine magnetism

The Magnetism Challenge: Part I

Wherein we examine, in something like “MythBusters” style, the dubious “Magnet Challenge”, without relying (too much) on the anti-scientific crutch of scientific authority First, a confession. The main reason I am attracted to these videos of people sticking magnets to the COVID vaccination injection sites on their shoulders, is that I love to watch normal …

The Magnetism Challenge: Part II – Scientific Disinformation During the COVID-19 Narrative Collapse

Wherein we look at how the COVID scammers are now using “magnetic” disinformation to try to escape justice for REAL abuse of liposome biotechnology to achieve [most likely contraceptive] vaccine persistence and migration. TL;DR – after mRNA vaccine persistence and anatomical migration were revealed in leaked Pfizer data, explaining “shedding” via persistent liposomes, the COVID …

Suramin and Pine Needle Tea

The Magnetism Challenge: Part III – Suramin: A Lesson in Discreditation of Dissident Scientists and Science

This is for the historical record. I hope that this analysis gets to the “dissident scientists” involved, but even if it never does, future historians will get a powerful look at what I call “Fake Science” – the establishment’s phony, deceptive and controlled scientific complex – and how infiltration, control, and discreditation of dissident populist …

If you read these articles, knowing what we now know from the Pfizer documents, then it’s very clear that Pfizer was quite vulnerable on several points about their mRNA COVID vaccine.

Feeding discred to their enemies? Totally believable. I actually have PERSONAL experience with such discreditation, because it’s a technique used WITHIN the pharmaceutical industry in their internal turf wars. Absolutely unsurprising that they might use this on their enemies outside.

But let’s just take that a little bit bigger.

Truth Social clearly made the right move by quickly reinstating Sherri Tenpenny. And not just on freedom of speech grounds. As I told Dr. Tenpenny, any vaccine that is designed to invoke a limited case of a bioweaponized disease is, in fact, a limited case of that bioweapon. What she was saying wasn’t even WRONG, much less disinformation.

Wait for her to advocate pine needle tea for containing suramin. THAT IS WRONG. And that error is STILL part of free speech, which can not only correct us, but which can sometimes lead us to CRIMES that need to be brought to the enemy’s doorstep.

Part of being unafraid of TRUTH, is being unafraid of ERROR.

However, don’t think for a second that the problem is over. Dr. Tenpenny and many other TRUTH WARRIORS are going to pick up disinformation and run with it – ESPECIALLY when our own intelligence agencies craft stuff designed for them, using our tax dollars. And that is to say nothing of Russian, Ukrainian, and Chinese disinformation, crafted for our side to pick up.

Just look at THE HOAX. Indeed, THAT is the “big end” of disinformation.

NOPE. Never sweep disinformation under the rug. HIGHLIGHT IT, so that we can dig into it, and then we can FIND THE TRUTH.

Maybe Truth Social can pioneer new ways to deal with disinformation without denigrating those we are seeking to enlighten.

W

FDA and Pfizer/China Throw Shade on Novavax to Keep Data on Safer Vaccines Out of VAERS

TL;DR – “I believe that mRNA vaccines have serious risks that would be REVEALED by approval of the Novavax vaccine.” –Wolf Moon

I’m actually surprised that FDA and Pfizer/China allowed Novavax to get this close to approval, but they clearly have the upcoming vote RIGGED, just like the 2020 election. The trusty “board mules” that FDA’s Pfizer-lovin’, China-compromised top brass used to approve dangerously experimental, “China-tested”, mRNA vaccines, will suddenly get some phony backbone on myocarditis and virtue signal against a less dangerous vaccine.

Remember Trump getting angry about what FDA and Pfizer (which is really China) did to the J+J vaccine? Same thing.

“Blame the victim.”

It’s how they work, people. And once you see it, you can’t unsee it.

Allow me to explain.

Let’s start off with how I instantly realized what’s in the cards.

As seen on Gateway Pundit, minus my scientific and political explanation of what is going on.

This is DAMN GOOD REPORTING. Thank you, Jim Hoft!

LINK: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/u-s-fda-says-novavax-covid-19-vaccine-linked-myocarditis-days-critical-vote/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.ph/WKuqT

This is CLEARLY a set-up to knife Novavax right before a crucial vote. But first, you need to know two things.

(1) Pfizer and Fauci BURNED THE PFIZER mRNA VACCINE PLACEBO GROUPS to hide the problems with the Pfizer vaccine. (The relevance of placebo groups will be explained a bit later.)

(2) According to Pfizer, which proudly revealed the following fact directly from the mouths of Pfizer’s top brass in a more China-virtue-signaling moment (look it up), ALL of their clinical trials (including all the COVID clinical trials of the past) are now run out of China.

SO – if you see all the SHADY SCIENCE that is popping up in the Pfizer documents, and is now being revealed thanks to Naomi Wolf, there is a simple explanation of why Pfizer burned their placebo groups, making it impossible for people to “check their math”.

CHINESE ETHICS (or lack thereof) are in charge of Pfizer’s clinical trials for all drugs and vaccines.

This is the same China that lies and cheats routinely on all things financial, business, manufacturing, etc. They’re the ones in charge of testing the drugs you are being forced to take by “China Joe”.

Yeah. Pretty convenient. Same vaccine our military is forced to take, too. VERY convenient.

This is a perfect example of “total warfare”, TBH. But let’s set that aside for now.

Back to Novavax.

It’s now very clear that the spike protein is a pathogen. We have gone through all the problems of using the pathogenic spike protein as an immunogen (which Robert Malone warned about, by the way, and which FDA ignored). The spike protein causes a lot of problems, including myocarditis and pericarditis, just like the disease itself. Those problems, however, are compounded by TWO aspects of the technology of the Pfizer mRNA vaccines.

(1) mRNA technology itself is dangerous, because the pseudo-mRNA doesn’t shut down promptly, and in principle can never truly meter the amount of pseudo-spike-protein produced. It can dangerously overproduce the protein.

(2) the lipid nanoparticles used by Pfizer reduce acute symptoms by a kind of delayed release, but this also leads to unnatural persistence, migration throughout the body, excretion of the vaccine itself in body lipids (otherwise known as “exposure” or “shedding”), and a variety of symptoms which differ from the disease itself.

These problems are sidestepped by the more well-understood Novavax approach, which being based on a protein vaccine uses a DIFFERENT kind of “nanoparticle” to present a fully formed pseudo-spike-protein – NOT the mRNA for such, to the cells of the recipient. The spike protein is NOT coated with a lipid envelope, but rather is presented in a “ball of spikes” manner similar to an actual virus.

It is extremely likely that protein vaccines like Novavax and Corbevax are – certainly at the moment – substantially safer than mRNA vaccines. That is an EASY hypothesis to make at this point. Any honest scientist who has seen the data so far could make it. Robert Malone, who deeply understands the mRNA technology, which he properly labels “immature“, gets it totally.

One way to see if the relative safety of current protein tech over current mRNA tech is true, would be to approve the very likely safer Novavax and/or Corbevax in the United States, and to begin letting the data from adverse events flow into the VAERS reporting system. This data would get beyond the “small set” problem of the current trial data.

It’s quite obvious WHY Pfizer and FDA would not want this to happen.

It is extremely likely that Novavax and Corbevax would show greater safety relative to both Pfizer and Moderna. This would naturally lead to the question of why Novavax wasn’t fast-tracked to American citizens in 2020 and 2021, instead of Pfizer and Moderna.

Get it? This is a COVER-UP.

Now – let’s look at the actual data. Novavax is underplaying their hand.

Novavax not being Pfizer, the latter with a known, CONVICTED track record of lying and cheating (particularly after they stupidly entrusted their clinical trials to CHINA), let’s assume for a moment that MAYBE the Novavax clinical trial data is not total lies.

Here is the Novavax statement about the myocarditis/pericarditis issue:

NEWS & MEDIA

Novavax Statement on US FDA Briefing Document Related to Myocarditis/Pericarditis

Jun 3, 2022

Throughout the pandemic, as publicly available vaccines have been administered, there have been numerous investigations into findings related to myocarditis. We have learned that we can expect to see natural background events of myocarditis in any sufficiently large database, and that young males are at higher risk. Myocarditis is most often caused by nonspecific viral infections.  

The data from our placebo-controlled studies show that overall, in our clinical development program, the rate of myocarditis was balanced between the vaccine and placebo arms (0.007% and 0.005%). Furthermore, in the post-crossover portions of our studies, the cases we have seen are all within the expected rate.  

Based on our interpretation of all the clinical data supporting NVX-CoV2373, including over 50,000 participants in clinical trials, we believe there is insufficient evidence to establish a causal relationship. We will continue to monitor all adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis.  

There are two ways to read this. Both of them argue correctly that the Novavax vaccine should be approved.

One way is to read it at “happy face value”. You are perfectly capable of doing that yourselves.

The other way is to read it, both knowing and admitting the hard truths about these vaccines, and what is actually possible when you make a vaccine against a minor coronavirus, for which the very need and justification are arguable at best.

I will read it the second, more conservative way, and you can follow along, sentence by sentence.

Throughout the pandemic, as publicly available vaccines have been administered, there have been numerous investigations into findings related to myocarditis.

This is another way of carefully admitting that myocarditis (more serious than pericarditis) is a real problem of the vaccines, because it’s a problem of the disease, because they both use the pathogenic spike protein.

We have learned that we can expect to see natural background events of myocarditis in any sufficiently large database, and that young males are at higher risk.

This is true. We’ve learned that myocarditis is a natural background problem for young people, and that the spike protein of the disease, BUT EVEN MORE THE SPIKE PROTEIN OF VACCINES, raises that risk for young people. All of this applying more to young MALES.

Myocarditis is most often caused by nonspecific viral infections.  

This is true in general. But it can also be caused by vaccines for viruses, as one might rightly expect, because vaccines are INTENDED as a limited case of the disease.

The data from our placebo-controlled studies show that overall, in our clinical development program, the rate of myocarditis was balanced between the vaccine and placebo arms (0.007% and 0.005%).

This is nice data for Novavax. Yes, the Novavax vaccine raises the risk of myocarditis in those who take it, but that risk is already minuscule, with Novavax only raising it by less than 50%. If you HAD to vaccinate kids, which we don’t, then Novavax is a relatively safe alternative, IMO.

Personally, I don’t think that children need the human vaccine AT ALL, because the DISEASE IS A BETTER VACCINE FOR KIDS. Yeah, think about it. Diseases can be vaccines, and vaccines can be diseases. Open your mind to the history of science, when we knew this stuff.

Furthermore, in the post-crossover portions of our studies, the cases we have seen are all within the expected rate.  

This is sneaky wording, but it’s a bit of a KNIFE pointed back at FDA. They all KNOW that this applies to all the other vaccines. And maybe even MORE SO in the case of mRNA vaccines.

What exactly IS the “expected rate” of myocarditis? I’m betting strongly that the “expected rate” of myocarditis and pericarditis GOES UP in all vaccinees, just like it goes up in all people who get COVID and don’t treat it, and that the increase takes the form of probability spiking after the vaccination, then settling down to a slightly elevated risk (vs. before vaccination), further increasing with age.

Does FDA want to go there? Probably not.

Based on our interpretation of all the clinical data supporting NVX-CoV2373, including over 50,000 participants in clinical trials, we believe there is insufficient evidence to establish a causal relationship.

This may very well be true. The clinical set may simply be too small to state conclusively that the difference of 0.002% between vaccine (0.007%) and placebo (0.005%) was caused by anything but randomness. Note that I, personally, am assuming the worst case – that this difference of 0.002% IS IN FACT caused by the pseudo-spike-protein of the vaccine – and am saying that this is still NOT reason enough to not approve the vaccine. APPROVAL will very likely give us the VAERS data to PROVE that there is real risk to all the vaccines, but that it is LESS for Novavax and (if they ever approve it) Corbevax.

And note that I am talking about ALL RISKS – not just myocarditis. My money would be on Novavax being safer than mRNA vaccines in terms of every possible metric, including (very importantly) general immunity. I believe that mRNA vaccines have serious risks that would be REVEALED by approval of the Novavax vaccine.

We will continue to monitor all adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis. 

Oh, that is a beautiful jab at Pfizer, which BURNED their placebo group.

What will you bet that Novavax is carefully protecting the integrity of their placebo group, because they’re not afraid of the evidence – like Pfizer/China?

Think very carefully about not approving Novavax, FDA. I’ve had your number for quite a while here. Better for you to swallow the bitter medicine of TRUTH, than to let this fester with a China-style cover-up that we will out on these pages every day for many moons.

W

Everybody_Wants_To_Be_A_Wolf.jpeg

ESG Needs to be the Next CRT – and We Will Destroy it With RCF

Environmental —> Religious

Social —> Cultural

Governance —> Freedom

ESG —> RCF

We are now approaching the climax of the battle with insane, self-infatuated, out-of-control, nobody-wants-this-stuff globalism.

The plotters of WEF at Davos have really tipped their hand, as revealed in a GREAT article that barkerjim alerted us to, today.

Day two of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland started off on a concerning note.

Some of the chief architects of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores met during a session called “Global ESG for Global Resilience,” and have clearly decided to double down on their objective for a new global economic order that transcends national borders and replaces free-market capitalism.

Destroying free-market capitalism in favor of a new “stakeholder” model, in which global elites hold all the power, has been their objective for years. A single ESG system gets them much closer to this goal, and will be significantly more effective at eroding national sovereignty, circumventing democratic processes, coercing companies into compliance, and ultimately restricting individual choice.

Early in the session, Hong Kong Stock Exchange Chairman Laura Cha got right to the point. She revealed, “To make ESG disclosures meaningful, we need to have a harmonized standard… It would be very good in terms of the work that the ISSB (the International Sustainability Standards Board) is doing to bring about standardized global measures.”

MORE: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/05/28/a-global-esg-system-is-almost-here-we-should-be-worried/

Don’t look at me to go “nervous Nellie” on this – or to ignore it.

DO NOT think for a second that we are going alarmist, Eeyore, despondent, or defeatist on this. OH NO.

We’re going to beat the SHIT out of ESG, and every WOKE will go BROKE as they cry over their own self-destruction.

We have SLAIN the CRT dragon, to the point that “they” of all stripes are already crying over that little dying monster.

WE *WILL* defeat ESG.

And we will have a good time doing it.

We already have a great head start on this.

ANDREW TORBA was way ahead on this stuff with his “parallel economy” thinking. His contention is that our best fight is to simply REPLACE the dying, suicidal, elite-controlled, leftard economy.

GO AND BUILD – Digital and Physical Sovereignty

EMERALD ROBINSON was also way ahead on the solution, with her thinking that RELIGION / CULTURE / POLITICS are LINKED IN A STREAM, and that religion is upstream of all the “issues” of contention.

Dear Conservatives: We Just Won the Great Battle of the Cultural War

Combining these two ideas leads straight to a TRANSFORMATION of ESG into RCF, and RCF is a PARALLEL way for us to judge, criticize, reject, and not be part of THEIR religious, cultural, political, and economic suicide.

Let me explain.

Environmental —> Religious

We all know that “climate change” (formerly “global warming”) is part of the left’s insane, misdirected, knee-jerk, corrupt, herd-like, virtue-signal-filled version of environmentalism, which largely serves to enrich virtue-signaling elites, destroy America and develop China. Every “mistake” that leftist environmentalism makes (see masks in the ocean, dead eagles, coal plants in China) is excused, as it answers to nobody while ACTUALLY destroying the environment through insane policies which cause unplanned consequences in unpredictable places. Compliant companies, governments, and even individuals do things that make no sense, and push compliant science to say it knows things for certain, when it does NOT know them, largely for “woke cartel” profiteering.

This is where the right to debate man’s place in this universe has been stripped away from the people themselves, and given to self-serving elites, via their lapdog “experts” who are willing to embrace financially predetermined policies.

ESG may seem that it only allows “them” (globalist elites) to do what they have already been doing for years, but the trick is that it allows them to do it PUBLICLY and without the slightest guilt. It gives shocking legitimacy to political, cultural and religious discrimination in finance.

Environmentalism as practiced “religiously” by the left, is basically a way to allow an anti-human religion to take hold and control humanity, which is deemed “environmentally sinful”.

Environmentalism, by the left’s standards, IS the secular left’s religion.

To counter it, we need to remember what the Boy Scouts always thought was important – RELIGION. Real religion. Real, time-tested, CONSERVED, religion.

To COUNTER the left, we need to evaluate companies, governments, organizations, and even individuals of the left on their RELIGIOUS values, actions, and record.

Will there be screaming?

YES. And it will be music to our ears.

One of the great advantages of going full-bore to RELIGION in “rating” the left in opposition to “environmental”, is that it will not only spotlight the horrible record of woke Christianity and Judaism – it will directly attack Hollywood and the woke, mass-shooter-producing gaming industry with the very thing they THOUGHT they had run out of town in the 1970s – the moral guidance of the Catholic Church and Orthodox Judaism. By having a certain amount of moral control over movies, “decency standards” were able to rein in some of Hollywood’s worst behavior. Sadly, the Soviet Union and cultural Marxists in the United States destroyed any morality control in Hollywood, by MOCKING decency controls.

Too bad for them. We bring it back under OUR CONTROL this time.

Our TRUE religion, applied as ratings, will leave their weak and worthless environmental religion where it belongs – in the dustbin of history.

Social —> Cultural

When the leftists and the globalists say “social”, it really means SOCIALIST. This is where ESG basically says “we will discriminate based on politics”.

This is absolute bullshit. To counter it, we flip THEIR word for our word – the one used over and over by Steve Bannon as being “upstream of politics”. That word is CULTURAL.

CULTURAL includes both the “social” and the “individual”, because a good and decent culture can and should RESPECT the individual as a critical part of building a healthy society.

This one is pretty easy, and VERY powerful. This is where we FIGHT BACK against cultural Marxism. If it is detrimental to our CULTURE, our SOCIETY, our NATION, and our PEOPLE, including INDIVIDUALS regardless of race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, etc., then it is CULTURALLY NEGATIVE.

That doesn’t mean that when “groups” step out of line, culturally, they get a pass.

Black is fine. BLACK LIVES MATTER RIOTING and RACE-HOAXING are culturally rotten.

Jewish is fine. ANTI-CHRISTIAN machinations (CRT, ESG, SEL, hoaxes) are culturally rotten.

White is fine. Actual, real, WHITE SUPREMACY and NAZISM are culturally rotten.

See? This is easy. It’s like falling off a log.

Trump and MAGA do “high cultural rating” in their SLEEP.

Is “culture-rating” going to make the radical left and the globalists cry? Get ready for tasty, salty, liberal tears on globalist ice.

Governance —> Freedom

This is a DIRECT counterattack on the idea that “governance” (more like meddling) is what is needed.

Where THEY will rank things low on “governance”, WE will rank highly on FREEDOM.

This allows us to ENCOURAGE FREEDOM in every place where the left claims somebody has a low governance score.

We will MOCK the left’s ESG when we counter it – eventually allowing low ESG scores to be a BADGE OF HONOR – backed up by high RCF scores.

And we can grow the idea of “freedom” scoring well beyond their “governance” boundaries, because YEAH, WE’RE FREE TO DO IT.

See how great it is to NOT be constrained by their thinking, by merely DEFENDING?

Going on OFFENSE in COUNTERATTACK has its advantages.

We will come up with scoring that makes the conniving, scheming, globalist SCUM have a BAD DAY EVERY DAY.

TL;DR –

THEY want to politicize finance?

WE will do it even better, even bigger, and when we do…..

WOKE WILL GO BROKE.

W

A Really Fun Bad (and Thankfully Short) Movie About The DemCom War on America’s Physicians and Patients

Please forgive me for showing you this, but I can’t help myself. I’m still laughing.

Here is what I saw on Gab, that led me to the video I want to show you.

Dr. Simone Gold @DrSimoneGold ·

This was truly shocking.

Kristina Lawson, President of the California Medical Board, can’t answer simple questions from a physician about her offices attack on hydroxychloroquine or threatening to revoke MD’s licenses for prescribing it.

Her corruption is rampant.

Watch on Rumble: 

https://t.co/cRoFReqI9I

That shortlink leads HERE, to a much longer (20 minute) video, really a mini movie.

https://rumble.com/vytqog-doc-tracy-pi-s1-e1-lawsons-hunt.html

Now, this movie is TERRIBLE, but it’s also GREAT.

I almost can’t believe that AFLDS.org produced this thing. Some of it is just CRINGEVILLE. BUT – I have to admit – it’s persuasive as all get-out. For normies, it’s a nice compilation of the problems with the vaccines INJECTIONS.

However, the over-done production, the cliche jokes, and the corny bad writing just make this every bit as fun as Robot Monster and Plan 9 From Outer Space.

Where it’s good, it’s good, but where it’s bad, it’s hilariously bad.

Please forward to future former friends, if you dare.

I think some guy named Alinsky said something about ridicule, or maybe it was about people not being able to walk the streets, or something like that. Are we there yet?

W

How Mayorkas and DHS Plan to Purge Republicans from State and Local Law Enforcement

If Republicans don’t rein in DHS now, they will be unable to stop what’s coming – to your state, your city, and your county

TL;DR – If you know how to read the Mayorkas document (because it IS in fact his document), then you will understand that the purpose of the report is to purge non-RINO Republicans and MAGA Democrats from law enforcement – FIRST from DHS, and then from all branches of state, federal, and local government, as well as private contractors, which may take federal dollars or “partner” in any way with DHS.

INTRODUCTION

It is tempting to believe that “these people are stupid”, but in my opinion, that is a tragic mistake, and it is a good part of why everything is going to hell right now.

Never assume that your enemy is not also reading Sun Tzu, and perhaps excelling as a student.

The ChiComs have used “lulling” as a technique from the very beginning. I saw it up close, when I worked in a place I call “shallow state”. The CCP’s and PLA’s lieutenants took us over, with the aid of American Bolsheviks and globalists. They’re ALL very good at what they do.

Trust me – when a ChiCom “assures you” of anything positive about yourself or your side, what he or she is doing is solidifying your position for their next move. They are making sure you stay exactly where you are, so that you don’t mess up their plans to BEAT YOUR ASS.

American communists work the same way.

Alejandro Majorkas plays the bald idiot spectacularly, but he is not an idiot, and neither is Barack Obama, nor are any of the players between THEM and “Mr. Global”, whoever (s)he is.

Don’t think that “Q” is stupid for saying they’re stupid, either. It’s a complicated business.

“Think mirror corollary.”

Their Plan

Whether or not you believe there is some kind of “plan” by the “white hats” for “devolution”, I can tell you this.

Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security installed by Barack Obama and “Big Sister” Janet Napolitano, has a plan to get ahead of devolution, and YOU are paying for it.

Gateway Pundit has the story – but they don’t have all of it. They did NOT read the fine print.

This is not just bluster.

This is not just for the bureaucrats at DHS.

This is not just for “we the little people” going to Trump rallies.

This is how they are going to PURGE state and local government and law enforcement of MAGA Republicans, moderate Democrats, and anybody else who SPEAKS THE TRUTH.

This is the “Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, and Mitt Romney support policy”, but it goes far beyond the federal government.

This is an attack on RED states, RED counties, RED cities, and even BLUE moderates who are not willing to toe the communist line.

So how does it work? For that, we look at the document.

We will be looking CLOSELY at two words – INSIDER and CONTRACTOR. These words lead us to what Mayorkas is really up to.

Now, before we get started, I have to tell you how such documents work under cryptocommunist bureaucracy.

When the communists took over my old employer, which I call “shallow state”, their Bolshevik and globalist puppets (who were installed to work around the compromised and paralyzed normals) had to tamp down all “upward flow” of information – and particularly the idea that this information should result in any unapproved action. All action had to be approved TOP-DOWN, and in general, it needed to actually ORIGINATE top-down.

Once that was accomplished, the commies and their go-alongers restored what LOOKED like upward flow, but was actually a kind of FAKE upward flow.

Off the books, and off the record, lower-level commie-compliant managers were TOLD FROM ABOVE exactly what they were to request, suggest or propose, perhaps doing so in their own words. No matter what, that request, proposal or suggestion was then “approved”.

Anything that did not arise in such a fashion was “studied” but not approved. On rare occasions, when it suited management’s purposes, some such proposals WERE approved after long study, but only as SHAMS and COVER processes, designed to deceive and hide. Credit for the stolen, killed, and skin-suited project would then be given to an apparatchik in need of a new cap feather. Nothing good would result from these projects.

This is EXACTLY what we have here. Mayorkas was GIVEN exactly what he wanted and needed, albeit with some cover language by the working group to suggest independence. One way you can see that smoke signal is in the larger message (I’m paraphrasing) that:

“We found almost no problem at all, BUT HERE ARE 15 RECOMMENDATIONS THAT SOUND LIKE WE DID FIND A BIG PROBLEM.”

We KNOW that the millions of horrified and pissed-off LAW-ABIDING patriots are not “domestic violent extremists”. We know that people like us are not dangerous. We know that protected leftist violent groups like ANTIFA and BLM are the actual “domestic violent extremists”, and that this is an Orwellian reversal.

But THAT is all cover.

That is a DISTRACTION.

What is REALLY going on here is something underneath the “outrage” of calling Americans like us “domestic violent extremists”, or even just “potential domestic violent extremists”.

This image is social programming from some Hollywood toxin called “The Purge”. This “purge” is actually antithetical to the quiet, silent, stealthy, Stalinist, DHS-planned “purge” I am talking about, but in an Orwellian and Hegelian way, it is used to create enough FEAR in the minds of average Americans, that they go along with the communist plan to purge patriotic Americans from Government.

Goebbels would be proud.

This is psychological SLANDER. And yet, at the very same time, it’s a PART of this.

JFK understood exactly what the other side is doing. This is what the Democrat communists do by saying we cannot speak the truth about the deliberately broken election system.

They give us one apparent exit – violence – and dare us to go through it.

They are making it impossible for us to object peacefully, while they stand ready to turn our own government upon us if we even hint at trying anything else.

Antifa? No problem. They’re OWNED and PROTECTED by DHS and FBI.

Americans? Problem. We’re OPPOSED and SLANDERED by DHS and FBI.

OK – I’ve stalled long enough. I did have a reason – a very good reason.

I wanted you to appreciate the enemy’s tactics here. They are NOT STUPID.

The enemy has BOTH a strategy and tactics, and they are apparent in the Mayorkas Document.

Assuming that you read the Gateway Pundit article…..

Mayorkas Releases New Rules on Extremism – DHS Will Target Anyone Who Believes Election Was Stolen or Who Challenged Fauci’s Everchanging COVID Narrative

…..let’s look at the document itself….. (H/T Gateway Pundit and SCRIBD)

If you just skim through this document, you will find fascinating stuff EVERYWHERE.

Start off with a point that MUST be made. The discussion of “who is a domestic violent extremist” completely ignores leftist violence.

I mean COMPLETELY.

Let me just put that into a quote for Zoe and other low-vision readers.

Current Domestic Violent Extremism Threat Landscape

A March 2021 unclassified threat assessment prepared by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Department of Justice, and DHS, noted that domestic violent extremists“ who are motivated by a range of ideologies and galvanized by recent political and societal events in the United States pose an elevated threat to the Homeland in 2021.”3 The assessment pointed to newer “sociopolitical developments such as narratives of fraud in the recent general election, the emboldening impact of the violent breach of the U.S. Capitol, conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and conspiracy theories promoting violence” that “will almost certainly spur some [domestic violent extremists] [sic] to try to engage in violence this year.”4

Report to the Secretary of Homeland Security Domestic Violent Extremism Internal Review Observations, Findings, And Recommendations

You can be damn sure, based on this, that the current bunch of [smart and devious] communist goofballs running DHS considers this blog to be a threat. Whatever. Keep it in mind. Act accordingly.

One of the things they do, right up front, is to put a LULL quote about protecting Constitutional rights at the end of a footnote. Yes, it’s just a footnote, and it’s just a sentence in that footnote, which isn’t even from this current study, but from a PRIOR one. Do not kid yourselves, in any case. This little qualifier means no real commitment, but it’s designed to promote self-deception by our side, and to provide some gristle for the FAKE NEWS FACT CHECKERS to say “toldjaso”.

MY EMPHASIS IN BOLD.

2 The Working Group used the definition provided in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s “Domestic Violent Extremism Poses Heightened Threat in 2021” assessment issued on March 1, 2021, which defines a domestic violent extremist as “an individual based and operating primarily in the United States without direction or inspiration from a foreign terrorist group or other foreign power and who seeks to further political or social goals wholly or in part through unlawful acts of force or violence.” It is important to note that the mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics does not constitute extremism and is constitutionally protected.

This mealy-mouthed stuff can be used to EXCUSE Antifa and GO AFTER patriots at the very same time. Up is down, down is up, and DHS is in control for OBAMA.

The text of this footnote quote is not on its own indicative of the idea that they ARE going to go after patriots and NOT violent leftists like Antifa. However, the fact that their definition of DVE (domestic violent extremists) above is so highly politicized, trying to shift the entire message of DVE 100% away from their political allies, Antifa and BLM, and onto the victims of their phony buffalo jump narrative, tells you all that you need to know.

Now, to start seeing their plan, you need to search for the word insider in this document.

The word insider shows up 27 times in the document. Two of those are in the executive summary, right at the beginning.

I am including the ENTIRE executive summary, because it shows how there is no evidence of a NEED for what Mayorkas and the communists are doing, but “because there are gaps”, they are going to do it ANYWAY.

CLASSIC. Classic communist tactics.

EMPHASIS IN BOLD IS MINE.

These are points that lead to the motherlode.

Executive Summary

At Secretary Mayorkas’ direction, a cross-Departmental working group of senior officials conducted a comprehensive review of how to best prevent, detect, and respond to potential threats related to domestic violent extremism within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The Department’s Chief Security Officer led the Domestic Violent Extremism Internal Review Working Group (Working Group), which included experts from across the Department, including from DHS oversight offices. The Working Group also consulted with several interagency partners during the course of its review.

The Working Group found very few instances of the DHS workforce having been engaged in domestic violent extremism. However, the Working Group assessed that the Department has significant gaps that have impeded its ability to comprehensively prevent, detect, and respond to potential threats related to domestic violent extremism within DHS. These gaps, which the Department is working with urgency to close, may have impacted DHS officials’ ability to adequately identify and address related threats, and include the following:

• a lack of an official definition of “domestic violent extremist,” guidance as to what constitutes violent extremist activity, and an established list of behaviors that may be indicators of domestic violent extremism;

• a lack of workforce training specific to identifying and reporting violent extremist activity;

• a lack of specialized training for those best situated to identify violent extremist activity or behaviors that may be indicators of violent extremism (e.g., background investigators, Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties inquiry officials, and DHS Insider Threat Program personnel);

• a lack of a centralized, interoperable DHS-wide investigative case management system, as well as standardized reporting and information sharing mechanisms for investigating allegations of violent extremist activity; and,

• insufficient funding needed to support the expansion of the DHS Insider Threat Program, development and implementation of related training programs, establishment of a DHS-wide related reporting mechanism, and implementation of the government-wide federal personnel security reform effort called Trusted Workforce 2.0.

To address these gaps, the Working Group made 15 recommendations described further below to enhance the Department’s ability to comprehensively address internal domestic violent extremism-related activity to protect our employees and DHS’s ability to continue executing its critical mission.

Wolf again.

The idea of INSIDERS is critical. Never mind that the CLASSIC insiders are “left wing extremists” like Obama, Jarrett, and – boom – Alejandro Mayorkas. Yes – the entire government has been turned on its head.

The actual “insiders” are now calling the shots – and calling the patriots “insiders”.

If it wasn’t SICK, it would be hilarious.

Like I said, I lived through this shit. And my mom did, too.

DHS obviously is a target for any group wishing to take over or influence the United States. Trust me – the place is chock full of trouble, not only top-level Kim Philby insiders like Mayorkas, but also including ChiComs, very likely in the form of red diaper two-steppers who have not yet “decloaked” as commies.

Searching further on insider, we are led to multiple interesting sections.

Most of these have to do with “solutions” to the threat of DVE as insiders, despite the fact that there don’t seem to be any.

If you just look through the headlines of the 15 recommendations of the “working group” that gave Mayorkas what he wanted, you will see that they provide a ROADMAP for purging DHS of those who may be threats – like people who question sketchy elections or murderous vaccinations.

Recommendation 1: Adopt a consistent definition of “domestic violent extremist” and descriptions of violent extremist activity and integrate both into DHS policies and guidance.

Recommendation 2: Adopt and implement a DHS-approved list of behaviors that may be indicators of domestic violent extremism.

Recommendation 3: Develop and implement an official DHS Directive that provides guidance on how to identify and respond to violent extremist activity within the Department.

Recommendation 4: Incorporate the list of violent extremist activity into DHS policy.

Recommendation 5: Educate the DHS workforce on the threat that domestic violent extremists within the Department could pose to the DHS mission.

Recommendation 6: Inform employees of their obligations to refrain from violent extremist activity and the existing reporting requirements.

Recommendation 7: Provide training on how to identify and adjudicate violent extremist activity to employees charged with personnel screening and vetting activity.

Recommendation 8: Enhance hiring practices through initiatives under Trusted Workforce 2.0 in order to deter and detect individuals engaged in violent extremist activity from applying to work for the Department.

Recommendation 9: Establish the intra-departmental sharing capability for investigations and inquiries involving DHS contractors and other non-employee insiders.

Recommendation 10: Promote early intervention to get support to employees who may be at risk of radicalizing to violence.

Recommendation 11: Establish efficient and accessible reporting and intake mechanisms to facilitate information sharing among stakeholders charged with addressing allegations of violent extremist activity.

Recommendation 12: Accelerate the expansion of DHS Insider Threat Program capabilities.

Recommendation 13: Incorporate the DHS list of behaviors that may be indicators of violent extremism into insider threat tools, including user activity monitoring.

Recommendation 14: Explore expanding the use of publicly available information, including social media, beyond personnel security vetting, to identify or investigate potential violent extremist activity within the DHS workforce.

Recommendation 15: Establish an ongoing DHS Domestic Violent Extremist Working Group.

Let’s look at those in reverse order.

The last one (Number 15) creates a permanent “Mayorkas control group” that can begin doing things much more under the radar. Again, as I said, they will not originate any ideas that are not fed to them from above. But once this group is created, there will be MUCH less sunlight.

Number 14 is notable in that it shows how they will use social media to purge patriots based on social media posting, and prevent new ones from taking their places.

Number 13 shows how they will monitor employees on the inside. This was done in “shallow state” too, but the original purpose was actual national security, later turned to politics, once the commies took over.

Number 12 means they are going to do this stuff quickly, before the 2022 and 2024 elections.

Number 11 is more Obama “information-sharing” crap, whereby DHS will blackball patriots and honest Americans quickly throughout the entire government. That INCLUDES Woke Military, now turned to shit.

Number 10 is code for “risk mitigation” by social isolation of identified patriots, and suppression of any networking by patriots and honest Americans inside DHS.

Number 9 is HUGE. We will come back to that one.

Number 8 is about preventing patriots from joining DHS. They are going to socially change DHS to be WOKE, and that means NEVER hiring anybody like Christina Bobb ever again.

They are going to do their best to keep people like Ms. Bobb OUT of DHS.

Number 7 is pure “top-down” re-education of DHS personnel, in terms of how to deal with patriots.

Number 6 is how they begin the behavior modification of people at DHS. This is just like what they did in Shallow State, and it works like crazy. People will politically change, when the job forces them to do so. They don’t THINK they will change, but they will.

Number 5 is how they set up the more intrusive behavior modification, by starting with “education on the threat”. This indirect accusation of patriotic American staff within DHS is also designed to have a huge “chilling effect” within the organization. It will create internal division and isolation of the “problem” people. This works on the same Bolshevik principles that were used to create Christian-Jewish division in the United States in the 1970s – but THAT is another story for a different post.

Number 4 is how they give the policy teeth BEFORE it’s actually tested and rolled out. This is totally unscientific if what you’re trying to do is create an effective organization. However, if you are taking over an organization, in an occupied country, it’s exactly what you want to do.

Number 3 is the big cheese – the big policy of “what to do” about the people to be purged or suppressed.

Number 2 is a big part of the real payload – the “how to determine who is bad” part. This is the PRACTICAL part of the “identification of the enemy”. This is how they DEFINE who is “bad” in practice, like the Nazi genealogical rules on who was a Jew and who was merely racially impure. This is the Nazi stuff. This is what my mother warned me about. This is straight out of the Third Reich.

Number 1 leads us back to where I started, with this image:

This is the THEORY of who is bad. This is the GUIDANCE of who needs to be purged. This is the “top-down” message on who should not be in DHS. It will by highly political, and BY DESIGN won’t touch the PROG-NAZIS that they want in DHS.

Now – I skipped over Number 9 because that one is going to be hugely important for what DHS is actually setting up. Numbers 1-8 and 10-15 are more about getting political control of DHS.

Number 9 is about spreading the purge.

Recommendation 9: Establish the intra-departmental sharing capability for investigations and inquiries involving DHS contractors and other non-employee insiders.

Understand this. “DHS contractors and non-employee insiders” is YOU, all patriots and honest Americans in law enforcement and contracting entities outside of DHS.

This is how it spreads.

One needs to look closely at the relevant section. If you search on the word contractors, it appears almost exclusively in the section for Recommendation Number 9.

Which I repeat below:

Establishing a centralized, interoperable DHS-wide investigative case management system and information sharing procedures for these types of investigations and inquiries will help mitigate against the risk that a contractor under investigation for potential misconduct leaves the applicable contract prior to the completion of the investigation.

Given that DHS has about 170,000 contractors, special consideration must be given to vetting this sizeable population, which has direct authorized access to DHS assets (e.g., facilities,equipment, information, and systems).

DHS has remedies available to address domestic violent extremism threats involving DHS contractors and other non-employee insiders, including limiting or prohibiting access to DHS owned, leased, and operated facilities and/or removing an individual from a contract, as well as referring information to an appropriate criminal investigative agency for further action.

Action 9.1: Establish a working group composed of relevant subject matter experts from across the Department to identify and implement procedures and system capabilities needed to permit information sharing of investigations and inquiries.

This is designed to spread the infection.

Do not think – with federal money going along with DHS contracts – that this infection of Federal Law Enforcement and National Security by flat-out communist political purges is going to be contained inside DHS by simply ignoring it.

Also remember this – with Mayorkas’ “working group” modifying DHS policy in perpetuity, it could get EVEN WORSE in the future.

In my opinion, Republicans in Washington won’t do ANYTHING about this.

And even if they TRY, Mitch McConnell, on behalf of China, will stop it.

Ain’t that right, Mitch?

Notice how stealthy and smart this attack was. DHS and other federal law enforcement and national security assets made themselves “integral” to all sorts of state, regional, county and local agencies and offices. They are now a “normal” part of local and regional American law enforcement. It is far easier to give in to DHS demands, than to tear up contracts over a few people who DHS asks to be blackballed and driven out of a “partner”.

170,000 contractors is a LOT of people.

Now, as DHS begins purges at home, it is going to “investigate” and “purge” patriots and honest Americans from everybody it works with.

It doesn’t matter whether any kind of “devolution” is planned, or just happening.

The idea of “devolution” to reduce federal dependency is a THREAT to these people.

If you thought the communists in Washington were not going to FIGHT BACK, when states like Florida decided to resist, you were WRONG.

DHS is GRANTING ITSELF the power to “vet” not only private contractors but also state and local law enforcement officers in contract with DHS, for the Washington communist definition of “extremism”.

To KEEP THOSE CONTRACTS, individuals will be thrown under the bus, and they will GO UNDER THE WHEELS OF DODGY JUSTICE.

THAT is the state of things.

In my opinion, if we ignore this, we will be beyond the salvation of “peaceful revolution”.

This is designed to give DHS the power to make all law enforcement OBEY WASHINGTON.

And you ain’t gonna like that world – trust me.

So what do we have to do?

We will have to fight back against this at every level. ALL Republicans who don’t want to live under Democrat neo-Bolshevism for the rest of their lives must resist.

If we don’t, the entirety of law enforcement and the military will – eventually – be turned against everyday Americans.

Those who would be our friends will not speak up.

We will be living in something very much like China, but also like Nazi Germany.

“Progzi America.”

I know this for a fact. I don’t want to live there.

Hopefully there are people who see how to attack the DHS strategy.

And if they do, hopefully they will not telegraph OUR strategy in return.

W

https://youtu.be/x-LZmohqlGE

BACKUP: https://ugetube.com/watch/general-flynn-the-advantage-in-life-in-business-and-in-wartime-goes-to-the-competitor-that-does-not_VJKDV5TyGfyOwBu.html

THE HISTORY of MR. GLOBAL’S ATTACK on our FOOD SUPPLY

First of a four part series on the ongoing attack on the American Food Supply including a time line.

“In an effort to escape the continuous, racking abdominal cramping, Alex curled up into a fetal position and begged me to hold him. I stroked his face, attempting to calm him, to soothe him. I watched in horror his life hemorrhaging away in the hospital bathroom; bowl after bowl of blood and mucus gushed from his little body. Later, I helped change blood-soaked diapers that he had to wear after he could no longer stand or walk. Alex’s screams were followed by silence as the evil toxins attacked his brain causing him to lose neurological control. His eyes crossed and he suffered tremors and delusions. He no longer knew who I was.”

Nancy Donley, mother of Alex and President of Safe Tables Our Priority

The agonizing death of this little boy and many others WAS DELIBERATE. It was ‘JUST POLITICS.’ An orchestrated death, along with others, used to play up the need for legislation that moved control of the US food supply FROM AMERICAN’S INDEPENDENT FARMERS TO THE AG CARTEL OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION.

Shielding the Giant USDA’s “Don’t Look, Don’t Know” Policy tells the tale of how the USDA ALLOWED ConAgra to Poison Americans with Tainted Meat to create a crisis to get their blasted Food Safety Modernization Act through Congress. For over a decade Congresswoman Rosa Delauro (D – CT) tried to get the food safety bill through congress with no luck. So they set-up a MAJOR food poisoning event the E. coli Outbreak at the 2004 North Carolina State Fair and the MSM blasted it all over the news. I give the insider details HERE . (Slight editing to make it more readable.)

…..I know Jason Wilke of Crossroads Farm Petting Zoo, the designated fall guy for the State Fair E. coli Outbreak in North Carolina (2004). It is curious that two weeks before there was NO outbreak at the Lee County fair where he was for a week and there was no outbreak the week after at another large venue. (I personally verified with the fair committee chairs.) However during the week he stayed home prepping for the state fair, an animal rights activist who was a USDA vet, stuck a thermometer up the butt of each of his animals thanks to that one line change in the Animal Welfare Act. She also told him she wanted to close him down. These actions and words were relayed to me via phone by Jason BEFORE the fair. (He wanted to vent and moan) … CDC did over 400 tests on Jason’s animals and the only vector route was through fresh feces. Skin/fur or mouth contact did not have viable organisms. Also it was the first case where this nasty strain of e coli showed up in sheep and goats. It was confined to concentrated feed lot operations prior to that. Operations that would be inspected by a USDA vet. The four year campaign by Animal Rights Activists in North Carolina to cause a bad accident/incident at pony rides or petting farms ended abruptly the week of the fair and has not resurfaced…. HMMMmmm.

Gail Combs

I did not mention in that comment that PETA targeted me, trying to arrange animal related injuries to children 4 times in the 6 months prior to the fair. The last attempt was less than a week before the fair. I have had no incidences since then. Also Feces SINK through the shavings so a child would literally have to go digging through the shavings for the fresh feces to eat. On the other hand State Fairs use casual labor (How many were PETA?) The food vendors would likely buy hamburger from the refrigerated trailers parked on the state grounds. The vendors equipment and area would be steam cleaned long before the inspectors would go looking for someone to pin the blame on. Therefore there would be zero chance of connecting the food vendors to the outbreak.

…What bothers me the most is that there is enough “leakage” to see the clear coordination. Like the “4 walling” of food related illnesses right up until the farm regulation bill was past. Now? Nothing. Well I’m sorry, but we did not overnight go to zero food poisoning or bacterial contamination. It just reeks of either deliberate contamination to create a panic or a deliberate propaganda effort coordinated from (somewhere) central.

It bothers me to think that the governments of the world are largely in the Railroading Business, but it is looking ever more that way. Clear lines of control, influence, action “for effect”, coordinated efforts agenda driven. I’d like to think we had a free association of people and a marketplace of ideas, evolving to the best ends. The evidence argues otherwise. The UN is clearly (and states so) acting as a central coordinating and influencing body. The intent to reduce the Nation State autonomy is also quite clear. (That the Big Players have publicly stated that intent makes it easier to see…

E.M. Smith (ChiefIO)

EM was certainly correct. Prior to that final incident in 2004 John Munsell tried to alert politicians and others. In a e-mail to me he even said he had a reporter stay with him for three days, write an article for a well know NY magazine, have it approved by the editor only to have the CEO kill the article at the last minute.

Meatpacking Maverick: John Munsell’s against-the-odds struggle for improved food safety — Mother Jones Magazine, December 2003 Issue

“Before the tainted beef arrived — USDA-approved and vacuum-sealed – Munsell had no reason to doubt the integrity of the food-safety system. But that changed after the meat he ground for hamburger tested positive for E. coli 0157:H7. Instead of tracking the contaminated meat back to its source, the USDA launched an investigation of Munsell’s own operation. Never mind that the local federal inspector had seen the beef go straight from the package into a clean grinder — a USDA spokesman called that testimony “hearsay.” By February 2002, three more tests of meat Munsell was grinding straight from the package came back positive. This time, as he would later testify in a government hearing, he had paperwork documenting that the beef came from a single source: ConAgra:


Munsell fired off an angry email to the district USDA manager, warning of a potential public-health emergency, and adding that if no one tracked down the rest of the bad meat, “both of us should share a cell in Alcatraz.” The agency moved immediately and aggressively — not to recall meat from Greeley, but to shut down Munsell’s grinding operation, a punishment that lasted four months. Despite Munsell’s continued whistleblowing — to Senator Conrad Burns (R-Mont.), national cattle associations, and his fellow meat processors — the USDA failed to address the alleged contamination at ConAgra’s Greely Plant. Then, in July 2002, Munsell’s worst fears came true. E. coli-tainted burger from Greeley killed an Ohio woman and sickened at least 35 others. ConAgra then recalled 19 million pounds of beef, one of the largest recalls in history.”

Michael Scherer, Mother Jones Magazine

John Munsell even contacted a lawyer, Bill Marler, a products liability attorney. One E. coli O157:H7 Outbreak I Think I could have prevented

 But again nothing was done. The switch from the ‘safest food in the world’ to feces laced hamburger can be traced to the switch from hands on USDA food inspection to HACCP, a new system where inspectors no longer inspect FOOD, they inspect PAPERWORK. John Munsell does a great job of explaining the change in:

HACCP’S Disconnect From Public Health Concerns (PLEASE READ)

An amusing short article on the harassment John had to put up with from the USDA: Five Minutes With John Munsell & A Trip To The Woodshed With The USDA

Unfortunately there are just too of many “incidents” that have been handled in such a way that transnational corporations are not “inconvenienced”. Stanley Painter, Chairman of the National Food Inspection Unions, stated in his testimony at the congressional hearing on the Hallmark Dower Cows:

“..when we see violations of FSIS regulations,.. we are instructed not to write non-compliance reports… Sometimes even if we write non-compliance reports, some of the larger companies use their political muscle to get those overturned….Some of my members have been intimidated by agency management in the past when they came forward and tried to enforce agency regulations and policies. I will give you a personal example: [SRM removal regulations concern brain and spine removal to prevent BSE] …

In December 2004, I began to receive reports that the new SRM regulations were not being uniformly enforced. I wrote a letter to the Assistant FSIS Administrator for Field Operations at the time conveying to him what I had heard…I was paid a visit at my home in Alabama by an FSIS official dispatched from the Atlanta regional office to convince me to drop the issue. I told him that I would not.

Then, the agency summoned me to come here to Washington, DC where agency officials subjected me to several hours of interrogation including wanting me to identify which of my members were blowing the whistle on the SRM removal violations. I refused to do so….I was then placed on disciplinary investigation status. The agency even contacted the USDA Office of Inspector General to explore criminal charges being filed against me…

Both my union AFGE and the consumer group Public Citizen filed separate Freedom of Information Act requests in December 2004 for any non-compliance records in the FSIS data base…. It was not until August 2005 that over 1000 non-compliance reports – weighing some 16 pounds — were turned over to both AFGE and Public Citizen that proved that what my members were telling me was correct – that some beef slaughter facilities were not complying with the SRM removal regulations… on the same day those records were released, I received written notification from the agency that they were dropping their disciplinary investigation – eight months after their “investigation” began.

Stanley Painter

When the act failed to pass under the sponsorship of Democrat Rosa Delauno, the Act was then CO-SPONSORED by Senator Burr (R – NC) I go through some of the ramifications of that law HERE. The KEY is the Ag Cartel controlled World trade Organization would determine the rules US farmers would have to live by.

SEC. 404. COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.
Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party.

Sir Julian Rose talks of the ramifications fo the OIE & FAO recommendations worldwide in The Battle to Save the Polish Countryside

….Spend hours out of your working day filling in endless forms, filing maps and measuring every last inch of your fields, tracks and farmsteads; applying for ‘passports’ for your cattle and ear tags for your sheep and pigs; re-siting the slurry pit and putting stainless steel and washable tiles on the dairy walls; becoming versed in HASAP hygiene and sanitary rules and applying them where any food processing was to take place; and living under the threat of convictions and fines should one put a finger out of place or be late in supplying some official details…

Sir Julian Rose

Do not forget that Bush signed a treaty to HARMONIZE US laws with that of the EU.

“In a sweeping move that has garnered surprisingly little attention this week the United States and the European Union have signed up to a new transatlantic economic partnership that will see regulatory standards “harmonized” and will lay the basis for a merging of the US and EU into one single market, a huge step on the path to a new globalized world order.” The BBC reported from the Summit in Washington on Monday….

http://stopspp.com/stopspp/?p=122 (Defunct URL)

And the FDA in 2003 even had up on their website: International Harmonization

The harmonization of laws, regulations and standards between and among trading partners requires intense, complex, time-consuming negotiations by CFSAN officials. Harmonization must simultaneously facilitate international trade and promote mutual understanding, while protecting national interests and establish a basis to resolve food issues on sound scientific evidence in an objective atmosphere. Failure to reach a consistent, harmonized set of laws, regulations and standards within the freetrade agreements and the World Trade Organization Agreements can result in considerable economic repercussions.

FDA

The international Ag Cartel was the driving force behind the Agreement on Agriculture, HACCP and the doubling of Food Borne illnesses. I did the graphs for a presentation before congress showing the five years before HACCP and the five years after. The USDA responded just as the DOD is now. ‘OH the first five years didn’t capture ALL the food borne illness. We switched to a different system where the reports (MANDATORY BY LAW) can be emailed instead of Faxed or sent by mail.’

This doubling of food borne illness, well hyped by the media, was used to justify the new law, the Food Safety Modernization Act, REGULATING farming (not the corporate processing plants.) These new regulations are meant to be used to kill off US independent farmers.

Again the USDA and the FDA LIED. They stated there had been no up date to our food safety system AFTER they had already implemented HACCP allowing the Ag cartel to inspect themselves.

In September, 1995, USDA’s Food Safety & Inspection Service presented a 600-page document Farm-To-Table – control of every step in the food chain from production to home preparation.

Reshaping USDA’s Meat & Poultry Inspection Program . . . An AAMP Perspective & Analysis Of The Agency’s Top-To-Bottom Review And How It Affects You And Your Business by Steve Krut, American Association of Meat Processors

For plants with more than one process (meaning more than one HACCP program), verification activities would be scheduled to ensure that all HACCP plans are covered at least once a month. Compliance over time would mean less frequent verification.

Some key steps:

Verification – Inspector checks to see that the plant is doing what is in its process control or HACCP plan. This may last several hours or perhaps one day.

Validation – FSIS evaluates the plant’s HACCP plan to be certain it is appropriate and works for the product and process covered. A target frequency for validation audit would be at least once every two years for every HACCP plan. This is likely to involve an FSIS out-of-plant technical person or team and take several days to a week, but will occur on site…

Steve Krut, American Association of Meat Processors

The Grain Trader Dan Amstutz, Who wrote the Draft of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture was VP of Cargill (grain) and then moved to Goldman Sachs (How Goldman Sachs Created the Food Crisis- with it’s entry into the commodities market) He originally worked in the department of Ag under Reagan but his draft Agreement on Ag and Draft farm bill was passed under Clinton.

Background from 1945: History, HACCP and the Food Safety Con Job

The author Nicole Johnson  takes us through how a Milner Round Table, the Committee for Economic Development (CED), intentionally changed the US agriculture system from a decentralized system to the vertically integrated system favored by the Ag cartel.

The human cost of CED’s plans were exacting and enormous.


CED’s plans resulted in widespread social upheaval throughout rural America, ripping apart the fabric of its society destroying its local economies. They also resulted in a massive migration to larger cities. The loss of a farm also means the loss of identity, and many farmers’ lives ended in suicide.

CED members were influential in business, government, and agricultural colleges, and their outlook shaped both governmental policies and what farmers were taught. Farmers found themselves encouraged to give up on a farming system that employed minimal outsourced inputs and capital and get “efficient” by adopting instead a system that required they go into debt in order to purchase ever more costly inputs, like fossil-fuel based fertilizers, chemicals, seeds, feed grain, and machinery. The local, decentralized food distribution networks that were previously in place became subject to corporate buyouts, vertical integration and consolidation, leaving farmers with fewer and fewer outlets to sell their goods.

With this consolidation of grain handlers, railways, food processing, meat packing, brewing and beverage makers, cereal makers, food retailers and restaurants, more and more of the food dollar went to processors and retailers, which gained increased market power. Farmers, meanwhile, were and continue to be squeezed on both ends: by input suppliers putting upward pressure on selling prices and by output buyers exerting downward pressure on their buying prices. 

This analysis is confirmed by the Keystone Center, an establishment think tank with representatives on its board from Monsanto, DuPont, Shell, Coca-Cola, Dow, General Electric and the Rockefeller Foundation, to name a few. The organization’s 2001 report “The Keystone National Policy Dialogue on Trends in Agriculture” observes that “Agricultural policy in many respects supported the concentration of farming into larger and fewer units. Some would say agricultural policy is biased toward bigness.”

Home Gardens ARE covered in case you are wondering..

“..FOOD PRODUCTION FACILITY- The term ‘food production facility’ means any farm, ranch, orchard, vineyard, aquaculture facility, or confined animal-feeding operation…”


There is NO exemption for instate commerce, for hobby farms, for you backyard garden.

“ The Administrator, in order to protect the public health, shall establish a national traceability system that enables the Administrator to retrieve the history, use, and location of an article of food through all stages of its production, processing, and distribution.
set good practice standards to protect the public and animal health and promote food safety;


conduct monitoring and surveillance of animals, plants, products, or the environment, as appropriate


require each food production facility to have a written food safety plan that describes the likely hazards and preventive controls implemented to address those hazards;


include, with respect to growing, harvesting, sorting, and storage operations, minimum standards related to fertilizer use, nutrients, hygiene, packaging, temperature controls, animal encroachment, and water”

Notice it does not say a person SELLING food, it says a person holds, stores, or transports food or food ingredients. This is very scary given Ag Sec. Venman’s ” September, 1995, USDA’s Food Safety & Inspection Service presented a 600-page document Farm-To-Table – control of every step in the food chain from production to home preparation. “

Also included is this.
“in any action to enforce the requirements of the food safety law, the connection with interstate commerce required for jurisdiction SHALL BE PRESUMED TO EXIST.”
The fact you are growing veggies for you and friends does not exclude you!

SEE: Overlawyered — H.R. 875, Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 by WALTER OLSON  and Trojan Horse Law: The Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 by Hans Bader

….Lori Robertson of FactCheck.org, who is not a lawyer (she has a B.A. in advertising), claims the bill doesn’t apply to “that tomato plant in your backyard.”  As a lawyer, I am skeptical of this claim (I co-represented the prevailing defendant in the last successful constitutional challenge to federal regulation under the interstate commerce clause…

….Ignorance about the law’s broad reach (and how it will be construed by the courts) has thwarted opposition to the bill, which will likely pass Congress. For example, a newspaper claims the bill “doesn’t regulate home gardens.” The newspaper probably assumed that was true because the bill, like most federal laws, only purports to reach activities that affect “interstate commerce.” To an uninformed layperson or journalist, that “sounds as if it might not reach local and mom-and-pop operators at all.” (The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Rosa DeLauro, has sought to forestall opposition to her bill by falsely claiming that that “the Constitution’s commerce clause prevents the federal government from regulating commerce that doesn’t cross state lines.”)

But lawyers familiar with our capricious legal system know better. The Supreme Court ruled in Wickard v. Filburn (1942) that even home gardens (in that case, a farmer’s growing wheat for his own consumption) are subject to federal laws that regulate interstate commerce. Economists and scholars have criticized this decision, but it continues to be cited and followed in Supreme Court rulings, such as those applying federal anti-drug laws to consumption of even home-grown medical marijuana. Indeed, many court decisions allow Congress to define as “interstate commerce” even non-commercial conduct that doesn’t cross state lines — something directly at odds with Rep. DeLauro’s claims.

Hans Bader