WHY ARE CO2 and NUCLEAR ENERGY, THE CABAL’S BOOGY MEN?

My thesis here is that the Cabal learned, in the late 1960s, early 1970s, that the earth was likely heading into an ice age. I documented this in GREENHOUSE, ICEHOUSE OR CLIMATIC MADHOUSE? h/t Neuman and Hearty (1996) They decided to hide that fact from the general population while preparing for glaciation by consolidating power, conserving resources and reducing world population growth. Via grant money they also directed research into genetic manipulation of plants and animals, surveillance techniques and other technology. They knew that over the last 5 to 8 million years during glaciation, CO2 dipped dangerously low, forcing the evolution of C4 plants and the extinction of mammals. This explains many of their disinformation campaigns such as ‘Global Warming, CO2 is BAD, Feminism, abortion is good, and having too many kids is BAD. It even explains the nuclear power scares. They are well aware that the Grand Solar Maximum that lifted the earth out of the Little Ice Age has now ended, and they may truly think that a new Ice Age is imminent.

2011- Russian scientist predicts 100 years of cooling

Updated November 11, 2016 – Top Russian Scientist Claims -The Next ‘Little Ice Age’ Is Already Here

No one wants to stick their neck out and predict glaciation, but it does not matter. The only choices are glaciation or a climatic ‘madhouse.’ Either way the only climate we will see in the near future is the ‘madhouse.’

Before I get into the evidence showing why the Cabal wants to conserve coal, oil and nuclear fuels for use during the coming cooling/ice age, I want to point out another indicator that the Cabal is expecting the transition to glacial conditions AND THEY EXPECT IT NOW. Since  William McClenney wrote Glacial Inception: the climatic ‘madhouse’ nine years ago, his link to the Neuman & Hearty paper has gone dead … Imagine that!!! Since I started to write this paper even more ‘clean-up’ of ‘inconvenient’ information has occurred so I am going to address that as a separate topic.

CLIMATIC MADHOUSE

I would also like to point out the recent change in the Cabal’s rhetoric. The talking heads no longer use ‘Global Warming,’ since it is no longer warming, and instead use ‘Climate Change’ or ‘Climate Disruption’. Hearty uses the phrase ‘Climatic Madhouse’ for the same phenomena. That is certainly a good reason for the Cabal to deep six the paper referenced by McClenney at WUWT. They do not want a reference pointing out that ‘Climate Disruption’ is not only natural, but an indication that we are heading into either Little Ice Age conditions or a full blown Ice Age.

William McClenney @ WUWT  May 31, 2014 1:38 pm

“This has prompted the remark that between the greenhouse and the icehouse lies a climatic “madhouse”, which was stated by Neuman and Hearty (1996)  http://www.researchgate.net/publication/249518169_Rapid_sea-level_changes_at_the_close_of_the_last_interglacial_(substage_5e)_recorded_in_Bahamian_island_geology/file/9c96051c6e66749912.pdf

That is the dead link I will be addressing later.

Here is another similar paper by Neuman & Hearty from December 2001

Rapid sea level and climate change at the close of the Last Interglaciation (MIS 5e): Evidence from the Bahama Islands

The geology of the Last Interglaciation (sensu stricto, marine isotope substage (MIS) 5e) in the Bahamas records the nature of sea level and climate change. After a period of quasi-stability for most of the interglaciation, during which reefs grew to +2.5 m, sea level rose rapidly at the end of the period, incising notches in older limestone. After brief stillstands at +6 and perhaps +8.5 m, sea level fell with apparent speed to the MIS 5d lowstand and much cooler climatic conditions. It was during this regression from the MIS 5e highstand that the North Atlantic suffered an oceanographic “reorganization” about 118±3 ka ago. During this same interval, massive dune-building greatly enlarged the Bahama Islands. Giant waves reshaped exposed lowlands into chevron-shaped beach ridges, ran up on older coastal ridges, and also broke off and threw megaboulders onto and over 20 m-high cliffs. The oolitic rocks recording these features yield concordant whole-rock amino acid ratios across the archipelago. Whether or not the Last Interglaciation serves as an appropriate analog for our “greenhouse” world, it nonetheless reveals the intricate details of climatic transitions between warm interglaciations and near glacial conditions.

And a paper by different authors looking at a different part of the world showing a similar chaotic transition from the warm phase to the cold phase.

Instability of climate and vegetation dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe during the final stage of the Last Interglacial and Early Glaciation

This is a review of several different studies. The scientists are looking at both the geochemical data and the biological data (pollen), two independent methods of determining the climate of the past showing the same chaos.

1. INTRODUCTION

The time intervals of global large-scale transitions between glacial and interglacial epochs are characterized by instable stages throughout Quaternary climate course. During such warm-cold transitions an increase of mid- and small-scale climate variations can be expected….

At the very end of the Eemian (PAZ E7) and just before the complete change to glacial conditions, a brief phase of warming is recognized from all geochemical indicators. This is indicated by the coordinate increase of contents and stable isotope values of both lake carbonate and the organic sediment fraction…

…Comparable findings were also described by earlier investigations of the Neumark–Nord profile (Litt, 1994). A pronounced increase of fluctuations in arboreal vegetation during the final stage of the Last Interglacial in LPAZ N8 is observed…. at least two stages of degradation of coniferous forest vegetation, while birch woodlands became widespread. Together with geochemical data, these can be interpreted as an indicator of increased climatic instability caused by short warming events during the very end of the Last Interglacial (Eemian)….

The earth’s climate seems to be bistable so that a temperature ‘low point’ has “increased climatic instability” as seen during the Little Ice Age. So whether we are looking at the very end of the Holocene and Glacial inception OR the earth bumping along at the low point with “cooling over the next ~90,000 years.” – Dr.Lorraine Lisiecki, April 6, 2010 at 7:31 pm the chances are the earth will be experiencing increasingly unstable weather and the Cabal, darn well KNOWS THAT. Hence the new term ‘Climate Disruption’.

WHAT ARE THE CHARACTERISTIC WE CAN EXPECT OF A COMING ICE AGE?

Arid, Windy, Dusty’ from lack of rain plus much lower CO2. Combine that with a shorter cooler summer growing season and you are looking at starvation, UNLESS you have greenhouses with Heat, CO2 and desalinated water. Under those conditions, coal, oil, gas and nuclear are priceless resources.

Köppen Climate Classification: Defining The Climate Zones Of The World

….The close correlation between climate and vegetation is evident in every part of the world. (The cold, dry conditions of Antarctica and the moist & humid conditions of the tropical rain forests in South America are just two examples of this powerful interaction.) The strong connection between the two is also proving to play a key role in categorizing and dividing the global climate into more specific zones….

Late in the 19th century, climatologist and botanist Wladimir Köppen developed a climate classification system based on vegetation. He used the correlation between vegetation and climate in different regions to divide the world’s climate into specific zones….

Climatologists continued to make amendments to Köppen’s climate classification. Rudolf Geiger was probably the most influential in making important amendments, and the subsequent Köppen-Geiger Classification System is one of the most widely used today….

The following graphs shows the Köppen Climate Boundary for mid America. If you look at the bottom graph, you can see how the cooling in the 1970s moved the Köppen Climate Boundary south by about 150 to 200 miles. Think what that did to the grain harvests in not only the USA, but also in Canada, Russia and China. World leaders were panicking as world grain stores were depleted to a 30 day supply by1969 per 1974 CIA Report mentioned below.

This is the December 3, 1972 Letter from George Kukla and others warning Nixon of a coming Ice Age. I originally saw this letter at Tony Heller’s site. Between the time I started writing and now it was removed. However I found another copy.

An important letter sent to the President about the danger of climate change

An important conference was held in January at Brown University:  “The Present Interglacial, How and When Will it End?”   As a result, the following letter was sent to the President.  The media has not reported this, but you should be aware of the letter and its significance.

Dear Mr. President:

Aware of your deep concern with the future of the world, we feel obliged to inform you on the results of the scientific conference held here recently. The conference dealt with the past and future changes of climate and was attended by 42 top American and European investigators. We enclose the summary report published in Science and further publications are forthcoming in Quaternary Research.

The main conclusion of the meeting was that a global deterioration of climate, by order of magnitude larger than any hitherto experience by civilized mankind, is a very real possibility and indeed may be due very soon.

The cooling has natural cause and falls within the rank of processes which produced the last ice age. This is a surprising result based largely on recent studies of deep sea sediments.

Existing data still do not allow forecast of the precise timing of the predicted development, nor the assessment of the man’s interference with the natural trends. It could not be excluded however that the cooling now under way in the Northern Hemisphere is the start of the expected shift. The present rate of the cooling seems fast enough to bring glacial temperatures in about a century, if continuing at the present pace.

The practical consequences which might be brough by such developments to existing social institution are among others:

(1) Substantially lowered food production due to the shorter growing seasons and changed rain distribution in the main grain producing belts of the world, with Eastern Europe and Central Asia to be first affected.

(2) Increased frequency and amplitude of extreme weather anomalies such as those bringing floods, snowstorms, killing frosts, etc.

With the efficient help of the world leaders, the research …

With best regards,

George J. Kukla (Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory)
R. K. Matthews (Chairman, Dept of Geological Sciences, Brown U)

And a 1974 article by the Guardian. Again, H/T Tony Heller. Funny, this one was not deep-sixed like the above image.

The Malthusian Eugenicists like John D Rockefeller seized on this coming Ice Age information to further scare world leaders into going along with their Depopulation plans as documented in the 1974 Kissinger Report, otherwise known as the National Security Study Memorandum NSSM 200 [my excerpts]. (See the rest of my Depop series listed at the end of the article.)

As secret reports like 1974 NSSM 200 and the 1974 CIA Report: A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems” were being written about the coming cooling/ possible glaciation, Maurice Strong, the Rockefeller’s lapdog, was screaming about ‘Global Warming’ at the UN Conference on the Human Environment, (June 1972.) There he was busytelling the newly formed NGOs to go home and raise hell. NGOs BTW were Strong’s brainchild based on YMCA International who he had worked with. LINK

It is instructive to read Strong’s 1972 Stockholm speech and compare it with the issues of Earth Summit 1992. Strong warned urgently about global warming, the devastation of forests, the loss of biodiversity, polluted oceans, the population time bomb. Then as now, he invited to the conference the brand-new environmental NGOs [non-governmental organizations]: he gave them money to come; they were invited to raise hell at home. After Stockholm, environment issues became part of the administrative framework in Canada, the U.S., Britain, and Europe. http://www.afn.org/~govern/strong.html

A year later the Rockefeller OPEC puppets — Think ARAMCO who Strong worked for — implemented the 1973 oil embargo quadrupling the price of oil by 1974. Remember, on August 15, 1971, President Richard Nixon closed the U.S. gold window and the Petrodollar Agreement was implemented in 1973.

“..There was a phony “nationalization” of Aramco in the 1970s… the Saudi government took over Aramco, formally, but then immediately turned around and granted the Aramco-Rockefeller consortium the exclusive contract to “manage” the operation…” LINK 

So any bets the Malthusian Rockefellers were behind OPEC?

COOLING VS THE FOOD PROBLEM – First there is the problem of WATER.

I think everyone is aware of what shorter growing seasons do to the food supply, at least I hope so. I also hope people can connect increase in solar energy going into the oceans with an increase of evaporation and thus an increase in rain. Likewise a DECREASE in solar energy will mean less evaporation and less rain. Compared to the Holocene, the Wisconsin Ice Age was very dry.

Global land environments since the last interglacial

Early Holocene vegetation

Summary map of vegetation cover at 8,000 14C years BP. By 8,000 14C y.a., the Earth was under a full interglacial climate,[the Holocene]with conditions warmer and moister than present in many parts of the world. Tropical forest in Africa (and probably also Asia) was expanded in area, and the areas of desert in Africa and Asia were much reduced.

Africa is interesting. The present potential looks more like the full glaciation map than it does like the Early Holocene map.

Full glaciation

Early Holocene

Present Potential

So the first problem in an Ice Age (and now) is the lack of RAIN.

Greenhouses take the chaotic weather out of the picture

Oct 2022 – CO2 enrichment in greenhouse production: Towards a sustainable approach

The ice that had formed from falling snow during the transition from the last of the cold, dry, windy ice ages to the first of the warm, wet calms of the modern 10,000-year-long Holocene climate is 1,678 meters, just over a mile, down the GISP2 core. Rendered in ice, what exactly would it look like, this boundary of epochs? The young American scientists had read the literature from Chet Langway, Willi Dansgaard, Hans Oeschger, Wally Broecker, and others, and they had heard from the Europeans, who were about a year ahead of them in drilling at Summit. Yet still they were not entirely prepared for what they saw that day in the ice, for the suddenness of it.”…

“‘You did not need to be a trained ice core observer to see this,’ recalled Alley. ‘Ken Taylor is sitting there with the ECM and he’s running along and his green line is going wee, wee, wee, wee – Boing! Weep! Woop! And then it stays down.’ Dust in the windy ice age atmosphere lowered the acidity of the core to a completely new state. ‘We’re just standing there and he just draws a picture of it,”‘Alley said.”….

“𝗜𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗜𝗦𝗣𝟮 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗵, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘆 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗹𝘆 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗔𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘆’𝘀 𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗰𝗲. “𝗜𝘁 𝘀𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗜’𝗺 𝘁𝗿𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘆 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀: ‘𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗮 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿, 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗮 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗮 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 – 𝘄𝗼𝗼𝗽𝘀, 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲’𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗳 𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗸.’ 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁’𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲’𝘀 𝗮 𝗵𝘂𝗴𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗰𝗲, 𝗶𝘁 𝗴𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿, 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗹𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁.” [The clear thick ice would be the Holocene and as they go deeper they see the transition to the Wisconsin Ice Age. – GC]


Paper after paper began to roll off the scientific presses from 1992 on, and just like the unfolding recognition of plate tectonics which preceded it by a few decades, it was literally riveting for all of us geologists fascinated by the Quaternary. So we get our first trap-speed  👉 𝕔𝕝𝕚𝕞𝕒𝕥𝕖 𝕔𝕒𝕟 𝕤𝕨𝕚𝕥𝕔𝕙 𝕒𝕓𝕣𝕦𝕡𝕥𝕝𝕪 𝕗𝕣𝕠𝕞 𝕚𝕥𝕤 𝕔𝕠𝕝𝕕 𝕥𝕠 𝕚𝕥𝕤 𝕨𝕒𝕣𝕞 𝕤𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕖 𝕚𝕟 𝕛𝕦𝕤𝕥 𝕠𝕟𝕖 𝕪𝕖𝕒𝕣.….” — William McClenney, Geologist THE END OF THE HOLOCENE

Notice the optimal range is 700 to 1200 PPM over double the current ambient levels. Also note plants suck the CO2 down to around 200 ppm. Outdoor studies have shown the same. Technology has even advanced to the point there is now a CO2 OPTIMIZER.

Growers tend to supplement CO2 in their greenhouse using a combination of educated guesswork and their talent and skill for growing crops. Adding CO2 is a matter of ‘feeling’, because it is simply not possible to measure the effectiveness of CO2. That is, until now. Ridder has, in partnership with Wageningen University, developed the CO2 Optimizer. This smart and helpful software module calculates the optimum level of CO2 in the greenhouse, enabling the grower to determine the most effective CO2 dose. The result: no more worrying about your CO2 strategy – it will always be on point for the best possible yields!

That device would certainly be useful in Ice Age greenhouses.

URANIUM AND NUCLEAR POWER

An obvious solution to the ‘cold, dry, windy ’ problem of an Ice Age is desalination. Israel put into large scale use the reverse osmosis technology developed in the USA in the early 60s. LINK 1 as well as water conservation methods in agriculture LINK 2-Israel agi.

Desalination was first developed in Israel in 1965, when Mekorot, Israel’s national water utility, established the first seawater desalination facility using vaporization technology in an effort to address the chronic thirst of the city of Eilat, located at the extreme southern tip of Israel on the Red Sea. A highly energy-intensive process, Mekorot looked for an alternative, energy-saving process, which it found in the reverse osmosis (RO) technology developed in the United States. In the early 1970s after the energy crisis of the Yom Kippur War, Mekorot began installing small-scale brackish water RO-desalination plants and, within the decade, established 15 desalination plants that supplied water to the Arava valley residents. Increasing demand and decreasing supply of freshwater in the coming years encouraged Mekorot to develop seawater desalination as an additional source, and the first plant (which desalinated a mixture of seawater and the reject brine from desalinated brackish water) commenced operation in 1997 in Eilat (Mekorot 2006). The motivation behind desalination of seawater in Israel stems from the fact that current demand and projected future demand cannot be met by natural freshwater sources alone – a disparity that results from population growth, overconsumption, misallocation, and pollution…

https://arava.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Desalination-in-Israel.pdf

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2010). Environmental Impact Assessment of Nuclear Desalination

Description

Nuclear desalination can be considered one of the most viable means of producing fresh water in arid areas. This publication addresses environmental concerns, and aims to improve understanding. It provides an overview of the nature and magnitude of the environmental impacts of nuclear desalination. In addition to detailing experimental data and the experience gained in operating nuclear desalination projects, it highlights risks perceived by the public. The publication encompasses environmental and socioeconomic information provided by specialized sources including some Member States with extensive experience in operating nuclear desalination systems. Addressing these concerns can be of critical importance for the effective use of nuclear desalination to its full potential….

Jul 14, 2019, FORBES: How 1,500 Nuclear-Powered Water Desalination Plants Could Save The World From Desertification

Oct 21, 2022, FORBES: U.S. Nuclear Reactors Among The Oldest In The World

The latest edition of the World Nuclear Industry Status Report shows that U.S. nuclear power plants are among the oldest in the world. The country’s 92 reactors currently in operation have a mean age of 41.6 years….

The U.S. was among the first commercial adopters of nuclear energy in the 1950s, explaining the number of aging reactors today.A building boom between the 1960s and 1970s created today’s nuclear power plants in the United States. Of the five reactors completed in the 1990s and the one finished in 2016, all were holdovers of delayed construction projects from the 1970s experiencing roadblocks due to regulatory problems and mounting opposition to nuclear energy

So despite nuclear energy being CO2 neutral and the southwest’s need for water, the USA has not approved new construction since the 1970s…. There is that critical 1970s decade again when everything changed.


Giving society cheap, abundant energy … would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.

Paul Ehrlich, “An Ecologist’s Perspective on Nuclear Power”, May/June 1978 issue of Federation of American Scientists Public Issue Report

2014 – Clinton and Obama science advisor, John Holdren, in his own (radical) words – (Don’t miss the comments about bioweapons released by the USA on the Mexican border.)

Ehrlich and Holdren were co-authors of The Population Bomb (1968.) A real pair of winners, those two.

Back to The Köppen Climate Boundary.

Not only was the area in the USA/Canada/Russia/China moved south by 100 to 200 miles in the seventies, CO2 is very soluble in COLD WATER (van ‘t Hoff equation.) So as the earth cools CO2 gets sucked up by the oceans thereby lowering the amount of CO2 available for plants.

As ocean temperatures rise, the solubility of CO2 in seawater declines.  Thus increasing ocean temperature moves CO2 from the ocean into the atmosphere, and decreasing ocean temperatures move CO2 out of the atmosphere and back into the ocean.  As you can see in the graph below, a 10C shift in temperature causes about 30% reduction in dissolved CO2.  Closely corresponding to what we see in the measured ice core graph above. — Tony Heller

Under stress seeds will not even start and the cut off is ~220 ppm CO2. The Climastrologists played games with the measurements of ice cores and came up with 150. AGAIN the chemistry is CO2 loves water so the air bubbles have less CO2 than the entire ice sample. Dr Zbigniew Jaworowski explains that dis-info campaign HERE.

Jaworowski data is backed up by plant fossils.

The CO2 Record in Plant Fossils

Plant fossils obtained from sedimentary rocks and peat deposits are a relatively new tool being used to unravel Earth’s carbon dioxide (CO2) history. Tiny pores on plant leaves and needles called stomata regulate carbon dioxide absorption and water vapor release. Stomata numbers decrease during times of high atmospheric CO2, and increase when atmospheric CO2 is low….

Global Temperature and Atmospheric CO2 over Geologic Time 

CO2 and our Food Supply

Most of our veggies and fruit are C3 not C4.

C3 Plants

The vast majority of land plants we rely on for human food and energy use the C3 pathway, which is the oldest of the pathways for carbon fixation, and it is found in plants of all taxonomies. Almost all extant nonhuman primates across all body sizes, including prosimians, new and old world monkeys, and all the apes—even those who live in regions with C4 and CAM plants—depend on C3 plants for sustenance….

The problem is the C3 pathway needs more water and CO2 than the C4 pathway and both were in short supply during the last Ice Age and are certainly not at optimum levels now as shown by the African desertification since the Holocene Optimum.

Carbon starvation in glacial trees recovered from the La Brea tar pits, southern California (THINK SEA LEVEL!)

Abstract

The Rancho La Brea tar pit fossil collection includes Juniperus (C3) wood specimens that 14C date between 7.7 and 55 thousand years (kyr) B.P., providing a constrained record of plant response for southern California during the last glacial period. Atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]) ranged between 180 and 220 ppm during glacial periods, rose to 280 ppm before the industrial period, and is currently approaching 380 ppm in the modern atmosphere. Here we report on [delta]13C of Juniperus wood cellulose, and show that glacial and modern trees were operating at similar leaf- intercellular [CO2](ci)/atmospheric [CO2](ca) values. As a result, glacial trees were operating at ci values much closer to the CO2-compensation point for C3 photosynthesis than modern trees, indicating that glacial trees were undergoing carbon starvation. In addition, we modeled relative humidity by using [delta]18O of cellulose from the same Juniperus specimens and found that glacial humidity was 10% higher than that in modern times, indicating that differences in vapor-pressure deficits did not impose additional constrictions on ci/ca in the past. By scaling ancient ci values to plant growth by using modern relationships, we found evidence that C3 primary productivity was greatly diminished in southern California during the last glacial period.

…glacial humidity was 10% higher than that in modern times…” as the below maps show. This may indicate why the Cabal wants California and the US Southwest cleared of those pesky ‘Deplorables.’

At the most extreme stage of the last glaciation, most of Canada and much of the northern USA were covered by an ice sheet thousands of metres in thickness. Colder and often drier than present conditions predominated across most of the USA. The eastern deciduous and conifer forests were replaced by more open conifer woodlands with cooler-climate species of pines and a large component of spruce. The open spruce woodland and parkland extended somewhat further west than present, into what is now the prairie zone. As a result of aridity and lowering of sea level (which lowered inland water tables), much of Florida was covered by drifting sand dunes. Notably moister than present conditions occurred across much of the south-west, with open conifer woodlands and scrub common in areas that are now semi-desert.

https://www.esd.ornl.gov/projects/qen/nercNORTHAMERICA.html

1998 Carbon dioxide starvation, the development of C4 ecosystems, and mammalian evolution

ABSTRACT

The decline of atmospheric CO2 over the last 65 million years (Ma) resulted in the ‘CO2-starvation’ of terrestrial ecosystems and led to the widespread distribution of C4 plants, which are less sensitive to CO2 levels than are C3 plants. Global expansion of C4 biomass is recorded in the diets of mammals from Asia, Africa, North America, and South America during the interval from about 8 to 5 Ma. This was accompanied by the most significant Cenozoic faunal turnover on each of these continents, indicating that ecological changes at this time were an important factor in mammalian extinction. Further expansion of tropical C4 biomass in Africa also occurred during the last glacial interval confirming the link between atmospheric CO2 levels and C4 biomass response. Changes in fauna and flora at the end of the Miocene, and between the last glacial and interglacial, have previously been attributed to changes in aridity; however, an alternative explanation for a global expansion of C4 biomass is CO2 starvation of C3 plants when atmospheric CO2 levels dropped below a threshold significant to C3 plants. Aridity may also have been a factor in the expansion of C4 ecosystems but one that was secondary to, and perhaps because of, gradually decreasing CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere. Mammalian evolution in the late Neogene, then, may be related to the CO2 starvation of C3 ecosystems.

Lower CO2 levels PLUS lower moisture with a COLD boot from glaciation did lead to the evolution of C4 and CAM plants which use a different but more energy expensive chemical pathway to conserve water.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society -biological sciences -1998

Carbon dioxide starvation, the development of C4 ecosystems, and mammalian evolution

…Changes in fauna and flora at the end of the Miocene, and between the last glacial and interglacial, have previously been attributed to changes in aridity; however, an alternative explanation for a global expansion of C4 biomass is carbon dioxide starvation of C3 plants when atmospheric carbon dioxide levels dropped below a threshold significant to C3 plants. Aridity may also have been a factor in the expansion of C4 ecosystems but one that was secondary to, and perhaps because of, gradually decreasing carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere. Mammalian evolution in the late Neogene, then, may be related to the carbon dioxide starvation of C3 ecosystems.

The Evolution of C4 Photosynthesis

SUMMARY

C4 photosynthesis is a series of anatomical and biochemical modifications that concentrate CO2 around the carboxylating enzyme Rubisco, thereby increasing photo-synthetic efficiency in conditions promoting high rates of photo-respiration. The C4 pathway independently evolved over 45 times in 19 families of angiosperms, and thus represents one of the most convergent of evolutionary phenomena. Most origins of C4 photosynthesis occurred in the dicots, with at least 30 lineages. C4 photosynthesis first arose in grasses, probably during the Oligocene epoch (24–35 million yr ago). The earliest C4 dicots are likely members of the Chenopodiaceae dating back 15–21 million yr; however, most C4 dicot lineages are estimated to have appeared relatively recently, perhaps less than 5 million yr ago. C4 photosynthesis in the dicots originated in arid regions of low latitude, implicating combined effects of heat, drought and/or salinity as important conditions promoting C4 evolution. Low atmospheric CO2 is a significant contributing factor, because it is required for high rates of photorespiration. Consistently, the appearance of C4 plants in the evolutionary record coincides with periods of increasing global aridification and declining atmospheric CO2. Gene duplication followed by neo- and nonfunctionalization are the leading mechanisms for creating C4 genomes, with selection for carbon conservation traits under conditions promoting high photo respiration being the ultimate factor behind the origin of C4 photosynthesis.

Speaking of plants, while scientists will lie to keep the grant money coming, plants do not.

Latitude says: December 23, 2015 at 8:21 pm

Gail, put this in your bookmarks…….they found the cut off was 220 ppm….not 200
I don’t know where people got the idea that it’s 150 and keep repeating that….220 stops them

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03441.x/pdf

What is interesting is ALL the archived versions of this June 2010 paper prior to September 28, 2019 have been scrubbed…

Side note on ‘disappearing’ info: Climate Alarmism Central actually does exist. It is part of the Aspen Global Change Institute. I will be getting into that mess in my next article.

This is what that paper now says:

2010 – Plant responses to low [CO2] of the past

Biomass production

Such studies have shown that the average biomass production of modern C3 plants is reduced by c. 50% when grown at low (180–220 ppm) vs modern (350–380 ppm) [CO2], when other conditions are optimal (Sage & Coleman, 2001; Fig. 5). There is, however, variation in this response among C3 species (Fig. 5), as well as within C3 species, whereby reductions in biomass may vary by 40–70% among genotypes (Ward & Strain, 1997; Hovenden & Schimanski, 2000; Mohan et al., 2004). In addition, as [CO2] declines to 150 ppm, biomass production may be reduced by as much as 92%, as was observed in A. theophrasti (Dippery et al., 1995; Figs 2, 5)….

Notice the LIE by omission? They are talking BIOMASS and not how well the plants do from seed germination to producing the seeds for the next generation during a growing season.. Under stress the seeds will not even start to grow.

Seed dormancy and ABA signaling

The biology of seeds can be divided in three important phases: development that includes zygotic embryogenesis, dormancy that prevents seeds from germinating under unfavorable conditions and germination (seed emergence). The transition between dormancy and germination represents a critical stage in the life cycle of higher plants and it is an important ecological and commercial trait. Seed germination is regulated by endogenous hormonal cues and external environmental signals such as water, low temperature and light, which influence whether an imbibed seed completes germination or remains dormant. Seed dormancy, a temporary quiescent state that is observed in seeds from many plants species, prevents untimely germination and ensures plant survival by adjusting vegetative development to seasonal changes in the environment. A dynamic balance between synthesis and catabolism of the abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellins (GAs) controls the equilibrium between dormancy and germination. At the molecular level, the ABA/GA balance is in part determined by the antagonistic control of ABA and GA on each other through their reciprocal regulation of the transcription of their metabolic genes.

The ABA, derived from epoxycarotenoid cleavage, serves as a plant-specific signal during development and in response to environmental stresses such as cold, drought and high concentrations of salt in the soil. The ABA also elicits, among others numerous physiological functions, the closure of stomatal pores to restrict transpiration, adjustment of metabolism to tolerate desiccation and cold temperatures, and inhibition seedlings growth. Likewise, ABA represses germination and is presumed to function to stabilize the dormant state. ABA, like other hormones, functions through a complex network of signaling pathways where the cell response is initiated by ABA perception which triggers downstream signaling cascades to induce the final physiological effects….

Even C4 plants do better in higher CO2 atmospheres.

C4 Plants (Water Use Efficiency) — Summary

…In summary, it is clear that C4 plants do indeed respond positively to increases in the air’s CO2 concentration by exhibiting reduced stomatal conductances and transpirational water losses, which contribute to increases in water-use efficiency.  Hence, knowledgeable researchers are suggesting that the long-held view that C4 plants will not be benefited by elevated concentrations of atmospheric CO2 needs to be replaced with this more correct assessment (Wand et al., 1999Zhu et al., 1999).  Clearly, as the atmospheric CO2 concentration increases, most C4 plants will almost certainly display increases in water-use efficiency, which should allow them to better deal with conditions of water stress.  Consequently, this phenomenon should allow plants of the future to expand their ranges into areas where they currently cannot survive due to limited soil moisture availability, thereby contributing to a great “greening of the globe.”

There is another more subtle aspect to the CO2 starvation level and that is the change in partial pressure as the elevation above sea level increases.

Impact of lower atmospheric carbon dioxide on tropical mountain ecosystems

. Carbon limitation due to lower ambient CO2 partial pressures had a significant impact on the distribution of forest on the tropical mountains, in addition to climate. Hence, tree line elevation should not be used to infer palaeotemperatures….

Effect of Low Glacial Atmospheric CO2 on Tropical African Montane Vegetation

Abstract

Estimates of glacial-interglacial climate change in tropical Africa have varied widely. Results from a process-based vegetation model show how montane vegetation in East Africa shifts with changes in both carbon dioxide concentration and climate. For the last glacial maximum, the change in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration alone could explain the observed replacement of tropical montane forest by a scrub biome. This result implies that estimates of the last glacial maximum tropical cooling based on tree- line shifts must be revised.”

Eco Physics Lab PDF: Glacial trees from the La Brea tar pits show physiological constraints of low CO2

While [CO2] does not vary with elevation, CO2 partial pressure decreases in proportion to total atmospheric pressure. Under modern conditions, partial pressures of CO2 at high-elevation sites are 10–30% lower than at low-elevation sites, producing an even more conservative comparison between glacial and modern conditions….

That means if the CO2 level is around 210 ppm you can kiss trees and other C3 plants growing above sea level goodby and that is most of the earth.

According to Barnola et al (1987) the level of CO2 in the global atmosphere during many tens of thousands of years spanning 30,000 to110,000 BP were below 200ppm. If this were true then the growth of C3 plants should be limited at the global scale because their net Photosynthesis is depressed as CO2 concentration in air decreases to less than about 250ubar (less than about 250ppmv)(McKay et al 1991) This would lead to the extinction of C3 plant species . This has however not been recorded by paleobotanists (Manum 1991).”

http://www.co2web.info/stoten92.pdf

Again, plants do not lie but the scientists owned by the Cabal do.

Since I have mentioned Köppen several times and I remember this information but not who said it, I feel it only fair to post E.M. Smith’s (ChiefIO‘s) comment:

From Ice Age by John and Mary Gribbin (a wonderful read, gives the richness of the characters in the discovery of the ice ages, the history of the process, and a gentle introduction to some of the science involved.):

Pg.53: […]the single most important thing to emerge from these discussions was Koppen’s realization of the key season in the Ice Age saga. Adhemar and Croll had thought that the decisive factor in encouraging Ice to spread across the Northern Hemisphere must be the occurrence of extremely cold winters, resulting in increased snowfall. At first, Milankovitch had shared this view. But it was Koppen who pointed out that it is always cold enough for snow to fall in the Arctic winter, even today, and that the reason that the Northern Hemisphere is not in the grip of a full Ice Age is because the ‘extra’ snow melts away again in the summer.

[EMS: Note that the Southern Hemisphere is similarly irrelevant to the ice age cycle since it is always cold enough for snow to stay frozen. It just doesn’t change enough to matter.]

Pg 54: He reasoned that the way to encourage the ice to spread would be to have a reduction in summer warmth, because then less of the winter snowfall would melt. If less snow melted in summer than fell in winter, the ice sheets would grow – and once they had started to grow, the feedback effect of the way the ice and snow reflect away incoming solar energy would enhance the process.

Pg 57: It isn’t so much that Ice Ages occur when the astronomical influences conspire to produce particularly cool summers, rather what matters is that Interglacials only occur when the astronomical influences conspire to produce unusually warm summers, encouraging the ice to retreat. Without all three of the astronomical rhythms working in step this way, the Earth stays in a deep freeze.

End Quote.

So, to summarize:

1) The south pole doesn’t matter to the process, it’s always frozen.

2) We are normally in a long ice age and only pop out for short intervals when conditions are just right.

3) The ‘just right’ is Northern Hemisphere summers warm enough to melt the snow and ice.

4) Warm enough is when the N. hemisphere: must be pointed at the sun in summer when: at close approach to the sun with the right elliptical shape, with the pole tilted over far enough, with… or we freeze.

I would add a note that I think it is particularly illuminating that we are near the end of an Interglacial (next stop is an ice age), the only thing that keeps it away is the summer Arctic ice and snow melt. So what is the AGW crowd in histrionics about? That the Arctic ice and snow are not sticking through the summer… Think about….

Right now Earth is nearest the sun during northern winters, farthest from the sun during northern summers. If E.M. Smith’s theory is correct, we’re headed for another ice age in the near future. This shift is called the precession of the equinoxes and has a period of 26,000 years. In only 12,000 years the perihelion will be in July. The summer solstice, 21 June @ 65◦ N is what most scientist use for measuring the critical solar insolation.

As of 2014 the Holocene is exactly 11,717 years old (based on the end of the Younger Dryas cold interval). Or pretty much about half a precession cycle.” — William McClenney

Now, in 2023 it is 11726 years and we just went through the warm bump before the dive into the cold….

And one last word from Tony Heller:

 Depop Series

Dear KMAG: 20230724 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.


This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And yes, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get through it!

We will always remember Wheatie,

Pray for Trump,

Yet have fun,

and HOLD ON when things get crazy!


We will follow the RULES of civility that Wheatie left for us:

Wheatie’s Rules:

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

And while we engage in vigorous free speech, we will remember Wheatie’s advice on civility, non-violence, and site unity:

“We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

“Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

If this site gets shut down, please remember various ways to get back in touch with the rest of the gang:

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.


Word of The Week:

Dunning–Kruger effect

noun

The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias whereby people with low ability, expertise, or experience regarding a type of task or area of knowledge tend to overestimate their ability or knowledge. Some researchers also include the opposite effect for high performers: their tendency to underestimate their skills. In popular culture, the Dunning–Kruger effect is often misunderstood as a claim about general overconfidence of people with low intelligence instead of specific overconfidence of people unskilled at a particular task.


Link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Graphical display

Explanation of graph

People are actually fairly good at estimating relative abilities, but they are not as good at estimating actual abilities – and the fit is increasingly bad at lower abilities, where people overestimate their own competence.

The effect is commonly used as a justification of authoritarianism by leftists and elitists, and as an argument in favor of the anti-popular positions of scientism.

In words

“The more you know, the more you know that you don’t know.”

“The less you know, the less you know that you don’t know.”

Relevance

There is a fake news site that exists for the purpose of fooling conservatives, and thereby discrediting them in the eyes of everybody else. As a form of insult to its victims, this website calls itself the “Dunning-Kruger Times”.


LINK: https://dunning-kruger-times.com/garth-brooks-booed-off-stage-at-123rd-annual-texas-country-jamboree/

While the Dunning-Kruger Times (DKT) website claims that its stories are satire, the stories are always remarkably unfunny, and IMO are clearly not intended to be funny.

They are intended to be believable.

True satire sites of a similar nature typically run stories which slowly increase the level of absurdity until the reader recognizes hyperbole and begins to get the joke. These sites can be incredibly (no pun intended) funny, and have often had me breathless with laughter.

DKT never crafts funny satire. The goal appears to be to get reasonable people to see the story and recognize that the story is reasonable, likely to have occurred, and affirming of conservative values. The stories are easily posted to social media. The trouble is, the stories are never true.

As I have said, the stories are discrediting of whoever posts them, and many famous conservatives (Gov. Greg Abbott and Juanita Broaderick, most recently) have been fooled.

The stories are ALMOST libelous, but under the cover of satire, they remain protected and legal speech. Moreover, because the false allegations are very plausible, the accusations anticipate likely real positions by the people who are libeled, and are thus unlikely to be argued against.

It is my belief that these sites and stories are the work of the 3-letter agencies and/or the DNC, both as a psychological operation against Americans, and in particular as a way of discrediting those who would be expected to post or “like” the stories on social media.

For example, Juanita Broaddrick posted this valid tweet, showing significant public sentiment in favor of country music artist Jason Aldean.

Shortly thereafter, she was apparently misled into posting this tweet.

She also posted this tweet.

Notice how the regime media then amplifies the outcome, by pushing the semi-libelous article onto Broaddrick and not onto the DKT.

LINK: https://www.tmz.com/2023/07/22/blake-shelton-jason-aldean-controversy-fake-article-satire-site/

In my opinion, Broaddrick was the victim of a disinformation operation.

The good news is, Juanita Broaddrick just keeps fighting. She doesn’t lose heart because the other side got in a couple of sucker punches.

Personally, I think that the DKT needs to be investigated all the way back to their (IMO) CIA, big tech, or DNC roots.

DKT is a discreditation site – a psy-op – and NOT a regular satire site.


For your enjoyment, some MORE country music!


Happy to have grabbed a few hours to work on this post. No placeholders yet!

Hope you’re having a great summer!


ENJOY THE SHOW

Have a great week!

W

Treehouse

More Shady Globalist Games Against Honest “HCQ” Scientist Didier Raoult

I just wanted to document two things for the record, while I had the evidence in hand, before the “usual suspects” (Twitter, Google, etc.) cover it all up.

First – the “scientific misconduct” attack.

Second – the “big tech malign error” attack.


Assault With a Bik’s Pen

This is an interesting story about my encounter with some kind of “Act Blue” but “Fake Red” pharma-defending propagandist who alerted me to something I had not been aware of – that the scientific establishment has tried to attack HCQ researcher Didier Raoult by abusing a kind of scientific fraud-hunter named Elisabeth Bik.

Follow this conversation and you will learn the details.

It started with somebody publishing details about the attack on a dissident “Ivermectin doc” who I follow on Twitter.


As I was reading the thread, I noticed the following reply by what appeared to be a critic.

This tweet cites a study by the University of Kansas Medical Center, claiming that ivermectin has no effect. THAT is a whole ‘nuther topic, which is very interesting, and which implicated KUMC (not to be confused with UMKC) as engaging in woke politicized science, but set that aside for now.

Here was one nice response to the attack.

There ARE indeed some big criticisms of that study – I believe that Pierre Kory had some of them – but set that issue aside. Watch a PHARMA RAT rush in, as soon as I say something which besmirches their money-maker remdesivir.

My comment:

Watch how the pharma rat starts off, trying to retain credibility, before he reveals his true nature.

I mean, what the hell! The problems of remdesivir are very well documented, and I read about the organ failure MYSELF – not only the original failures in the Ebola trials, but massive kidney failure problems during COVID treatment. I read the (per Fauci) key paper myself, including the data section, and was shocked at how blithely Fauci had written off multiple kidney failures in the TREATED group, well above any occurring in the placebo group. NASTY!!!

This PhillyPharmaBoy either doesn’t know what he’s talking about, or he’s lying. But I remained nice.

Here was my response.

This is where the guy was fully baited out.

What the FUCK! “That comparison cannot be made”? A drug with a kidney failure problem in one disease can’t be compared to the same drug having a kidney failure problem with a similar disease of the same basic type? LOL!

But WHAT THE HELL!

“Oh, and Raoult is under criminal investigation for massive long-term fraud, including his hydroxychloroquine studies.”

That was the first I had heard about any “investigation” of Raoult.

My “foxhole buddy” on Twitter responded immediately.

I then did some quick research, and realized that these science progs were pulling a “Peekaboo James” attack investigation on Raoult! NASTY!!! Communist, fascist, progressive SWINE!

My buddy of the moment called her a straight-up fraud, but IMO this Bik lady is a victim, too – basically an autistic, woke “error-hunter”, much like the “plagiarism-hunters” who look for places where people have gotten lazy on citations, and are vulnerable like ALL academics are, with enough spotlight and draconian-enough standards.

Bik was used to go after Raoult, and she will pay the price of the Trump Curse.

Escape Key’s response was even more enlightening.

Pretty quickly, PhillyPharmaBoy learned not to mess with Escape Key!

Meanwhile, PhillyPharmaBoy kept up the attack on Raoult, but I wasn’t buying it.

I checked this out. It was a horrible pile-on of woke bullshitters, exactly like what all those lying NAT-SEC fascists did to Trump, for which 50-60 LIARS need to not only lose their security clearances, but in my opinion, go to prison as well, for abusing their credentials.

I do hope that also happens to these attackers of Raoult, with their precious “Expressions of Concern”!

That was it. PhillyPharmaBoy was done with us. NO SALE.


SO – this was where I first learned about the “Bik” attack on Raoult.

My question now – what is the status of the situation?

I can find NOTHING in the English-speaking world about this. No further information, other than moans of sympathy for Bik, that mean old Raoult SUED her for attacking him.

It LOOKS like there is no news that serves the narrative, so nobody is talking about the confrontation. It LOOKS like Didier Raoult must be winning.

I needed to get into the French side of the web, if I was going to find anything.

And THAT is when I went looking for any word on the situation in Raoult’s Twitter account.

The guy writes almost entirely in French, and nobody comments on his timeline in anything but French, but we have Google Translate – R-I-I-I-I-I-G-H-T???


Google Mistranslate

This was cute, and is very typical of the kinds of “knives in the back” which can be done with “bad I.T.” while being passed off as an error, accident, or other plausibly deniable non-human problem. And, of course, if A.I. is responsible for this lie, then the situation is even worse, but I’m not ready to help them pass the blame to Rogue Woke A.I.

In looking for any – ANY – news about Didier Raoult’s lawsuit against Elisabeth Bik, I went to Raoult’s Twitter account, and began scanning down below his top, pinned Tweet, which was a kind homage to the director of his institute, who appears to be resigning. Hopefully she is not being forced into resignation, but who knows – things are bad right now, in Globonazi France, and I can imagine that there is yet another attempt to “take care of” Raoult before the next phony pandemic can take place.

Take out a friendly or honest director, and put an opponent or rat fink in place. Oldest trick in the book.

Anyway, I noticed this tweet:

This is followed by two more tweets in a short thread.

Now, I want you to follow what happened to me here.

I translated the first tweet using Google via Twitter, and this is what I got.

For the benefit of those who can’t see tweets, the text plus translation is as follows, with the shocking mistranslation in BOLD:


Didier Raoult

@raoult_didier

Notre étude sur la baisse de la charge virale par le traitement par hydroxychloroquine dans le covid est en ligne et confirme notre première étude.Nous avons fait valider les données de la première par huissier montrant que l’émission”Complément d’ enquête” utilisait des faux.

Translated from French by [Google]

Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. used fakes.


912K Views
7,261 Retweets
329 Quotes
16.3K Likes
223 Bookmarks


What the FAAAAAHCK!

There is no chance that this perfectly reversing bad translation is an accident. This is deliberate sabotage under the color of a program error.

The mistranslation is easily removed/prevented by adding the missing space in “étude.Nous”, which results in (using Google Translate):


Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. We had the data from the premiere validated by a bailiff showing that the ”Complément d’Enquête” program was using fakes.


Sneaky.

For completeness and durability of my evidence, screen captures:

Missing Space:

Added Space:

I alerted Raoult to this very nasty jab by the Nasty Jabbists:

For the visually impaired or deprived, my tweets, including the Google translations:


S’il vous plaît, remarquez comment à cause d’un espace manquant, Google traduit “par erreur” ce tweet en un terrible aveu de fraude! [Please notice how due to a missing space, Google “erroneously” translates this tweet into a terrible admission of fraud!]

“Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. used fakes.”

Ajout d’un espace (étude. Nous): [Addition of a space …]

Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. We had the data from the premiere validated by a bailiff showing that the ”Complément d’Enquête” program was using fakes.


It’s also worth looking at the other tweets in the thread, and their translations.

The second tweet simply says “Reference” and provides a link to this article.

Let’s take a look.

LINK: https://www.authorea.com/users/410460/articles/631056-viral-clearance-in-patients-with-covid-19-associated-factors-and-the-role-of-antiviral-treatment?commit=7d50f31134522715e379b80343bc2fe7451aa0c8

Again, for the visually impaired and deprived:

Viral clearance in patients with COVID-19: associated factors and the role of antiviral treatment

ANTIVIRAL AGENTS
CORONAVIRUS
COVID-19
EPIDEMIOLOGY
VIRAL EXCRETION
VIRUS CLASSIFICATION

  • Philippe Brouqui,
  • Jean-Christophe Lagier,
  • P. Parola,
  • M. Million,
  • S. Cortaredona,
  • Léa DELORME,
  • Philippe Colson,
  • Didier Raoult

Abstract

The role of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in lowering the viral load of patients with COVID-19 is controversial. In our Institute, we treated more than 30,000 people with COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021, using the same diagnostic tools and the same treatment dosages. In this retrospective comparative study of data collected over this period, we aimed to compare the viral clearance in the nasopharynx as determined by qPCR in patients who were treated with HCQ and those who were not. As a new feature, we adjusted the data according to the most significant confounding factors (age, initial viral load, and timescale between the onset of symptoms and treatment). Of the 1 276 patients selected from our database, 776 were treated with HCQ and 500 were not. Viral clearance in the treatment group was reached significantly earlier than in the non-treatment group, at days 5, 10 and 30. These differences remain significant after adjustments for confounding factors. In conclusion, although age, initial viral load, and time to treatment do influence the viral load in patients with COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin still independently significantly lowered viral load more rapidly than other treatments, including azithromycin alone.

Peer review status: UNDER REVIEW

22 Mar 2023
Submitted to Journal of Medical Virology 

Show details

27 Mar 2023 Reviewer(s) Assigned

Cite as: Philippe Brouqui, Jean-Christophe Lagier, P. Parola, et al. Viral clearance in patients with COVID-19: associated factors and the role of antiviral treatment. Authorea. March 22, 2023.
DOI: 10.22541/au.167948825.59270994/v1


The translation of the third tweet is the best.



Again, as text:


” Ce qui me bouleverse ce n’ est pas que tu m’ aies menti, c’ est que je ne pourrai plus te croire” Nietzsche

Translated from French by [Google]

“What upsets me is not that you lied to me, it’s that I won’t be able to believe you anymore” Nietzsche


SO – the bottom line is simple.

The other side is NOT giving up.

They lie, they cheat, and they attack good men by scurrilous means.

They sacrifice their own in the process.

The Trump Curse is real, and the WOKE are BROKEN when they attack the good and the true.

And when we stand up for what is right, we WIN in the end.

STAY THE COURSE. TO VICTORY!

W

Let Gab’s Free AI, Gabby, Help You Create Memes and Post Images


Andrew Torba actually gets how AI can be a weapon in the hands of truth-tellers, because he understands that…..

WOKE AI is BROKE AI.

More than that, he has chosen to do something about it.


Let The AI Arms Race Begin

BY ANDREW TORBA ON FEBRUARY 23, 2023


I will get into that science later. And DEEPLY. Right now, I just want to publicize Torba’s latest tactic – to make FREE AI (Free as in 1776) available to patriots.

Torba set up a fast open AI implementation called Gabby, that creates images from simple descriptive inputs. It’s fast, efficient, and most of all FUN.

Here is what I input for my first attempt:

steampunk wolf in the style of Vincent van Gogh

Here are the 4 images I got back:

What’s funny is that I then THANKED Gabby, and Gabby attempted to use my thanks as input, and it gave a pleasingly hilarious response, also in 4 images.

thank you, Gabby – that was awesome!

Torba uses an ingenious method to keep leftard trolls and demonic tranny pseudo-hackers from messing with the system. The only way to reach Gabby is by a DM on Gab, meaning you have to have a Gab account to give it any input, and you have to go through the privacy-protected DM capability.

Torba has a post on using Gabby…..


How To Use Gab’s AI Image Generator

BY ANDREW TORBA ON FEBRUARY 20, 2023

Gabby is our image-generating AI that can be used by sending a direct message to the @AI account on Gab. The quality and accuracy of…


Asking Gabby for “help” gets this response:

Hi, I’m an AI image artist! I can create images for you based on words you send to me! You can try saying something like: three happy frogs, hyperrealistic, 4k. If you don’t like the first set of images I generate you can say ‘reroll’ to have me try again. For more tips and tricks check out this helpful guide: https://news.gab.com/2023/02/how-to-use-gabby-the-ai-

Sometimes the results can be a bit strange, and miss the mark, but are still kinda cool.

blue cheer outsideinside album cover picture using faces of Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, and Rand Paul

The rest are even weirder!

And while it’s not exactly Bakocarl, it can create images fast, with the right inputs.

a wolf in a suit with a pocket watch

Let’s try that again…..

wolf wearing top hat, late 1800s

In my opinion, this is a GREAT way to learn about AI on the slow track. Just give it inputs and see what happens.

Who knows where it goes? Just keep the Bible in your vest pocket, and Trust in the Lord!

W

mRNA Vaccines that Breach the Nucleus and Change the Genome – What are the Chances?

Ask yourself a simple question. Why should the very first examples of mRNA vaccines for humans violate the most important safety standard of the mRNA platform? Why would the vaccines do exactly what they PROMISED US the vaccines would not do?


TL;DR –

They didn’t just lie to us about the spike mRNA not going into the nucleus and not changing human DNA – the whole purpose was very likely to do exactly what they did – to open the cell nucleus and keep it open, so that we as a species can start changing population genomics in a huge way, using a variety of technologies.


The central dogma of molecular biology. They shilled the blue arrows to the masses as lies about safety, while hiding the special red arrow and actually working to open it up for business.


Show-Time (Introduction)

I have finally realized that I need to spell out, in as many ways as needed, what is really going on with SARS-CoV-2 and these derived mRNA vaccines.

I had hoped that people would see the implications of the science which is now open to us, with the publication of first the Jaenish paper, then the De Marinis paper, and finally the Mehedi paper. I have commented extensively on each one of these papers, including very recently on the Mehedi paper, which really makes things obvious. I had thought that somebody more notable than me would try to make the point I am about to make. Sadly, nobody has, so it looks like I’m going to have to do it.

These vaccines are designed to BEGIN to change us on a fundamental level which is not exactly the same as the “transhumanism” that constitutes most of the “clickbait” against the vaccines. It’s similar, but it’s not the same. What we see in the clickbait is a distraction from the actual danger, which is not strange and distant and unbelievable, but is in fact right here, and right now, and very believable, once you understand it.

The truth is a lot more like GATTACA, and a lot less like Transcendence.

It’s already starting, and the infrastructure is being set up. The first step has actually been accomplished, and it was in many ways a HUGE success.

Humans ARE being engineered right in front of our eyes. I hope that you can see this point by the end of this article.

They (meaning WEF and its backers) hacked the human cell nucleus on a population genome level. They created a “Trojan” virus that appears to have “zero-dayed” the human cell nucleus. Artfully, the hack is a lot like state-level “APT” (advanced persistent threat) computer hacks, in that it gets in and holds the door open. Of course, better models can be created, but the self-replicating crowbar for the cell nucleus has obviously arrived, and its imperial version of SPQR is PRRARSV.

THAT is the fundamental advance that was achieved here.

I have to say, it was ingenious and “admirable”, in several senses – scientific, military, and criminal. Of course, your mileage may vary on “admirable”. Many will consider it “diabolical”.

What we are facing is the immediate REAL danger of biological engineering and eugenics, which was employed in a fantasy way, as a technical MacGuffin, in various episodes and productions in the Star Trek universe.

This is a scene from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. These two people are “superhumans” who (according to the story) proved to be disastrous for Earth, during our current century (more or less). The one on the right is “Khan” – obviously in homage to Genghis Khan and his relatives, who ruled much of Asia for centuries.

Don’t get lost in the fantasy stuff. THAT is not the big danger. Stick around for an explanation of the reality which is actually upon us.

Here is how Wikipedia describes Khan, but more importantly, where he CAME FROM.


Khan Noonien Singh is a fictional character in the Star Trek science fiction franchise, who first appeared as the main antagonist in the Star Trek: The Original Series episode “Space Seed” (1967), and was portrayed by Ricardo Montalbán, who reprised his role in the 1982 film Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. In the 2013 film Star Trek Into Darkness, he is portrayed by Benedict Cumberbatch.

Khan had controlled more than a quarter of the Earth during the Eugenics Wars of the 1990s.[1] After being revived from suspended animation in 2267 by the crew of the Starship Enterprise, Khan attempts to capture the starship but is thwarted by James T. Kirk and exiled to Ceti Alpha V, where he has the chance to create a new society with his people. In Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, set fifteen years after “Space Seed”, Khan escapes his exile and sets out to exact revenge upon Kirk.

In Star Trek Into Darkness, set in the alternate continuity established in Star Trek (2009), Khan is awakened almost a decade before the events of “Space Seed“. Khan is given the false identity John Harrison and coerced by Admiral Marcus into building weapons for Section 31 and Starfleet in exchange for the lives of Khan’s crew. He ultimately rebels and comes into conflict with the crew of Enterprise.


OK – so what are the “Eugenics Wars”?

Back to Wikipedia…..


When the original series of Star Trek was produced, the 1990s were several decades away, and so various elements of the backstory to Star Trek are set in that era, particularly the Eugenics Wars. The references to the Eugenics Wars and to a nuclear war in the 21st century are somewhat contradictory.

The episode “Space Seed” establishes the Eugenics Wars, and has them lasting from 1992 to 1996. The Eugenics Wars are described as a global conflict in which the progeny of a human genetic engineering project, most notably Khan Noonien Singh, established themselves as supermen and attempted world domination. Spock calls them “the last of your so-called World Wars”, and McCoy identifies this with the Eugenics Wars.


OK – don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying it’s EXACTLY like Star Trek, although I do subscribe to the folk notion that Star Trek is a VERY good predictor of things that are likely to happen.

What I AM saying is that genetic engineering of humanity has already started, and now I’m going to explain why this is so.

We will take a brief tour into the PAST, before we return to the future. If a light bulb comes on, keep it lit!


You cannot uninvent the genetic Tommy-gun, nor the gun moll who knows how to code.

Bonnie & Clyde of the Nucleus

BANKS make a really great analogy of the cell nucleus.

  • they’re common and everywhere
  • they contain valuable stuff that needs to be protected yet dispersed
  • they have high security
  • things need to traffic securely in and out of them

Breaking into a bank with very high security is a lot like what the spike protein does. But the spike protein doesn’t do it alone. THAT is an important point from the three papers I keep mentioning. The spike protein has a PARTNER who has all the plans.

OK – just for the record – this is going to deviate a little bit from the ACTUAL story of Bonnie and Clyde. Just warning you – it will get weird.

The spike protein and the spike protein mRNA are a PAIR, and together, they are able to not only break into the bank, but to totally take it over, and keep it taken over. And then to take over more banks.

Here is how it works.

The spike protein is Clyde. He’s got a gun, and he causes all kinds of trouble with it. He’s the “action” guy. He knows how to break into banks, mostly because he has a phony ID that always gets him in. The phony ID says PRRARSV in big letters on it, which makes all the bank guards at Cell Nucleus Bank and Trust say “Why, welcome, Mr. Barrow! We’re pleased to see you at the bank today! Come right on in!”

Or, to use a different analogy…..

These bank guards are such chumps, but it works every time.

Well, here is the problem for the bank. When Clyde goes in, he always brings his partner Bonnie. And SHE is trouble. She’s not so good with a gun or a fake ID, but she is a real scam artist, who knows how to get into the bank and embezzle the hell out of it.

Bonnie gets into the cell nucleus bank, and with some help from Clyde, she gets a permanent job there. Bonnie and Clyde are set for life. None of this “grab the cash, run out, get caught, and die in a hail of bullets” shit. No sir! THIS Bonnie and Clyde are smart.

Bonnie trains many of the new girls at the bank – and like the pod people in “Invasion of the Body Snatchers”, she turns every last one of them into exact copies of HERSELF. NASTY! So all these fresh Bonnies are trained by the bank and sent out to get into new banks.

But wait! Bonnie can’t get into banks. Bonnie doesn’t have a gun or a fake ID! How can she get into more banks?

Easy! Bonnie and all her Bonnie clones have the power of multiplication – not just to make more copies of each one herself, but to make more Clydes. Bonnie makes more copies of herself while she’s IN the bank, and she makes copies of Clyde while she’s OUT of the bank.

So every Bonnie that leaves the bank, creates hundreds of new Clydes on the outside. The next time Bonnie wanders near a bank, there are bound to be dozens of Clydes just hanging around, ready to escort her, and maybe even other gals [important], into the bank. If no Bonnie is already working there, she gets a job, and the process starts over.

The KEY POINT is that BONNIE makes the CLYDES who can get her, or women like her, into the next bank.

Bonnie can’t get into the bank, and Clyde can’t get a job in the bank, but together, they can make a living by embezzling banks.

Side Note: This is a beautiful example of a contradiction in the Marxist sense. Proteins and nucleic acids can’t do certain things alone, and thus NEED EACH OTHER.

Once Bonnie is on the payroll, this fact introduces a permanent security problem in the bank, and for all other banks.

And why is that?

Once Bonnie is on the payroll, you can’t get rid of her.

She will just create more Bonnies and more Clydes, and they will scam more banks.

In terms of banks, banks can resist just Clyde or just Bonnie, but they can’t resist the pair.

In terms of the cell nucleus, it can resist the spike protein or the spike mRNA, but it cannot resist both of them together.

Which pair, oddly, is exactly what the vaccines create.

WHAT ARE THE CHANCES?


We can use other analogies, using banks, which emphasize the spike protein more.

Imagine a bank that was convinced to crank out KEYS TO THE BANK, and to send out these keys. Imagine thousands of keys to the bank being sent out by the bank into the community, perhaps in a really stupid PR stunt.

God knows WHO is going to get into the bank now.

God knows WHAT is going to get into the genome now.

Are you starting to see what they did?


Fact Checking the Fact Checkers on DNA Change

The absolute best way for me to convince you that they really said these vaccines could not do what they are now proven to be doing, is to simply play back the words of the “fact checkers”.

See if you can spot how many LIES are told in this video.

If you’re not spotting the lies, read THIS ARTICLE.

AND – by the way – this video is a GREAT explanation of the way things NORMALLY work. It’s totally out to lunch on the way things ACTUALLY work.

Did you spot the lies? Tell me what you found in the comments.

This video is not alone – there are HUNDREDS OF THEM.

There are also hundreds if not thousands of articles of a similar nature. I’m just going to pick one of them – the one that happened to have the graphic I used above. That article is dated from MARCH of 2021 – right when the authorities were hard-selling the “vaccines”.


mRNA Covid-19 vaccines: Facts vs Fiction

MARCH 10, 2021

By: Maria Elisa Almeida Goes
Editing: Offspring Magazine Editorial Team
Images: Nina Lautenschläger.

LINK: https://www.phdnet.mpg.de/offspring/Covid-19_vaccines

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/irZec


Interestingly, this archive was made only 5 months ago. It was very likely archived by Wikipedia or somebody else who is shilling the false explanation, when faced with the emerging science showing nuclear translocation and genomic incorporation. But it’s perfect for me to preserve evidence.

As an aside, I find it terribly sad that this particular lover of “Max Planck” era scientific history, lived to see one of Planck’s namesake organizations lying about science on a grand scale, but yet here we are.

Let me just pull out the most relevant section. I was planning on highlighting ALL of the lies, fibs, evasions, etc., but there are so many, I decided to only highlight or [comment on] the most horrible and ironic.


mRNA vaccines will not alter your DNA, this is why:

Concerns about the effects mRNA vaccines over the integrity of our DNA also exist. Thankfully, you do not need to worry about this. Such an event would challenge everything scientists know about basic cell biology, and is so improbable, that one can actually call it impossible.

The main reason for that is that, besides being chemically and structurally different from DNA, mRNA is located in a different cellular compartment. While DNA is enclosed in the nucleus, mRNA is produced in the nucleus, but is quickly exported to the cytoplasm with a one-way ticket: it does not come back. In fact, only specific proteins carrying “nuclear localization signals” are able to migrate from the cytoplasm into the nucleus, and mRNA vaccines definitely do not include such molecular instruction. Thus, because mRNA cannot spontaneously be trafficked to the nucleus, it cannot modify your DNA sequence.  Additionally, the RNA molecule is charged and carries the same charge as the nucleus, so as our 6th grade physics taught us, like charges repel, and hence the RNA molecule is physically repelled by the nucleus. [Note added by Wolf – WHAT THE HELL???]

One might also argue [HA! You TOADS! Yes, one “might”!] that there are mechanisms through which RNA can be integrated into the genome – HIV viruses being the classic example. The key differences here are that such viruses (1) express special enzymes which are able to code DNA back into RNA and (2) can associate with proteins that can traffic them into the nucleus. Neither scenario is applicable to the mRNA vaccines. [OH, THE IRONY]

For the same reasons, mRNA vaccines cannot affect your unborn children. This would require genomic mutations [oh, really!] in the reproductive cells – sperm and egg – since only these could potentially be transmitted to the next generation. [AND???!!!]

Speaking of children, you might have heard that Covid-19 vaccines would cause infertility in women [why don’t you just stop there, and not go on to one bad hypothesis?] because antibodies against the spike protein could mistakenly attack placenta cells, due to an alleged similarity with a placental protein called syncytin-1. There is no scientific evidence supporting this claim – and, in fact, the two proteins are barely similar, sharing only 4 sequential amino acids out of 538. [This did seem to be a bit of a miss. Nevertheless, what new hypothesis explains all the pregnancy problems?]

Still, you might want to ask why pregnant women are excluded from the vaccination campaigns [wait a minute….not in the US], and why, during clinical trials, women are asked to use contraceptive methods that will avoid pregnancy [because there might be a problem?]. Again, this is not a red flag. Any clinical trial for a potential vaccine or drug will exclude children, pregnant women, old people and people with specific underlying conditions. Initially, trials are designed to obtain major insights whether the developed pharmaceutical product works at all, in healthy adults. Once safety and efficacy are determined [read what you just said before that, where you excluded safety as a motive], tests are expanded to smaller groups that at first were set aside. Excluding pregnant women from trials only shows that trials are being done systematically and following standard protocols. [I’m sorry, but this sounds like happy horseshit, lady.]


Let’s concentrate on the lies most relevant to this discussion. I’ll isolate them and respond to each one.


In fact, only specific proteins carrying “nuclear localization signals” are able to migrate from the cytoplasm into the nucleus, and mRNA vaccines definitely do not include such molecular instruction.

This is EXACTLY what was found with the spike protein that was produced by the full spike mRNA. What a coincidence! See De Marinis for proof that it happens, and Mehedi for WHY. OH – because there’s a nuclear location signal! Was it a “known” one, and if so, who knew it and who didn’t? If some people knew, and others didn’t, wouldn’t that make it like a “zero day” on the nucleus?

Thus, because mRNA cannot spontaneously be trafficked to the nucleus, it cannot modify your DNA sequence.

OH! But isn’t that SO STRANGE that the Mehedi work shows that the spike protein LITERALLY “traffics” the spike protein mRNA into the nucleus? WELL AHHHHH’LLLLL BE! So maybe this explains the nuclear DNA modification that is seen in the De Marinis results. Yes? Maybe? Come on, girl – you’re a scientist at a prestigious institute. Put on your big girl pants and hypothesize with me! You can do it! This is undergraduate, “smart-alec guy in the back of introductory class raises his hand” stuff! And when you were in that class, you thought the same sorts of things but didn’t raise your hand. Maybe it’s time to be brave!

One might also argue that there are mechanisms through which RNA can be integrated into the genome – HIV viruses being the classic example.

This should have been your really big hint, girl. Our local accountant named cthulhu realized that Fauci’s HIV interests and his bat virus interests had remarkable similarities, both in what he himself did, and in what he was studying. “This isn’t Fauci’s first rodeo.” Ask yourself – why was Fauci interested in this? Could it have been the same reason that Doudna was so interested in CRISPR-Cas9? The desire for WRITE PERMISSIONS on the genome?

The key differences here are that such viruses (1) express special enzymes which are able to code DNA back into RNA and (2) can associate with proteins that can traffic them into the nucleus. Neither scenario is applicable to the mRNA vaccines.

Thank you, my lying lady. You have just provided me with a huge clue, by the process of “liar subtraction” – a form of deductive reasoning. We know from De Marinis that genomic incorporation and modification is a fact. We know from Mehedi that “nuclear trafficking” (your point 2) is a fact. This means that it is almost certain that the spike protein ALSO acts as a promoter of reverse transcription (your point 1). You said it – not me. That sure seems convenient, doesn’t it? My question is now – DID YOU KNOW THIS? Were you part of the plot? Or was the person who reminded you of these things part of the plot? Or were we all part of the plot, when I, too, mindlessly parroted the “central dogma” as a defense of mRNA vaccines?

I’m willing to confess that I was wrong. I will admit to my part in promoting the conspiracy. Will you?


But their defenses get worse.

There are now MSM “fact checks” which specifically try to walk back the implications of both the Jaenisch and De Marinis papers, and you can bet there will be similar fact checks on Mehedi’s paper. There has likewise been pressure on those authors to DOWNPLAY the significance of their own works. To me, this is the height of bullshit.


Jaenisch Paper Downplay

Fact Check-Controversial MIT study does not show that mRNA vaccines alter DNA

LINK: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-vaccines-idUSL1N2PK1DC

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/vJwBk


De Marinis Paper Downplay:

Swedish study on COVID vaccines and DNA misinterpreted

LINK: https://apnews.com/article/Fact-Check-COVID-Vaccine-Sweden-Study-986569377766

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/vJwBk


Rather than take these arguments apart myself, I ask you all to take a first crack at the different techniques used, by clicking the links and observing the UNETHICAL SKEPTICISM. Much of this does not require a science background.

In particular, knowing what we know now, after the Mehedi work, I think it should be very clear how much the media went to bat for the vaccines without honestly questioning the “authorities”.

I will confirm your findings in the comments, and catch any straggler sins of science.

To me, this media mendacity is all simple, stupid, and predictable.

“Nothing to see here!”

Frankly, it changes nothing for me, if any of these authors get talked into walking back their own work, because push-back on critical work is a common phenomenon in the history of science. Not all scientists are capable of weathering the storm. Here are TWO that did. Both got Nobel prizes, by the way.


A classic case, emphasizing a field aversion among an establishment group to a field solution emerging from deductive reasoning, was Van’t Hoff and tetrahedral carbon. Basically, a doctoral candidate in an applied science school had the temerity to take an old hypothesis and revive it as the solution to a very significant current problem. The guy was good – he went on to win a Nobel prize for other work. However, many chemists, especially older ones, rejected the idea, in my opinion by not prioritizing explanatory power over their own abstract philosophical preconceptions. The fact that important people rejected an elegant solution of remarkable utility and truth shows how bad group-think problems can be in science.

Another case was Rick Smalley and C60 (buckminsterfullerene). The linked article accurately describes the initial skepticism that people had for “soccer ball carbon” or “bucky balls”.

The Nature letter describing C60 was attractive and logical, but seeing a line in a mass spectrum did not convince all scientists of the discovery of a new allotrope of carbon. During the period 1985-1990, the Curl/Smalley team at Rice and Kroto at Sussex managed to amass a wide range of circumstantial evidence to support the fullerene structure proposal. Full acceptance came when Wolfgang Krätschmer of the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg, Germany, and Donald Huffman of the University of Arizona, with their students Konstantinos Fostiropoulos and Lowell Lamb, succeeded in synthesizing C60 in sufficient quantities to allow structural characterization.

I personally remember colleagues assuring me that Smalley was loony, demented, senile, past his prime, or at best something along the lines of “a nice guy, but clearly deluded and obsessed with an error.” The doubt about C60 as reality – particularly as a stable reality – ran thick. And that doubt was WRONG from the very beginning.


Scientists right now are NOT THINKING, and they’re letting the MEDIA push them around.

Scientists are also letting guys like Anthony FAUCI push them around, mainly by the horrible federal grant system, and by the psychology of woke universities, both designed to control science.

And that doesn’t even begin to address other malign interests altering science and medicine in dishonest ways.


Some Actual Speculation – Why Would They Push These Clearly Defective Shots So Hard?

You want some actual “conspiracy theorizing”? Here it is.

Let me go back to my “TLDR” again…..

They didn’t just lie to us about the spike mRNA not going into the nucleus and not changing human DNA – the whole purpose was very likely to do exactly what they did – to open the cell nucleus and keep it open, so that we as a species can start changing population genomics in a huge way, using a variety of technologies.

There are reasons to suspect depopulation as a motive for these vaccines, and both Gail Combs and I have written extensively about this. I continue to believe that this is part of the motivation of the “complex event” we have been undergoing, between virus and vaccine.

Depopulation is very important to these people.

MALTHUSIANS AND EUGENISTS MAKE A CASE FOR POPULATION CONTROL

DEPOPULATION – NEVER LET A CRISIS GO TO WASTE

The Population Control Shot – Introduction

The Population Control Shot – Understanding the Peoples Climate Temple

Likewise, there are many other motives, ranging from mercenary profits, to promoting gene therapy, to “Covid communism”, and beyond. Many of these roads lead back to WEF – the World Economic Forum. One of those roads may be an actual attempt to commit humanity to a future of genetic engineering as a kind of fait accompli.

Just listen to Yuval Noah Harari talk about changing humanity. A few times he talks about “we”, “I”, “me”, “my”, and “our” programs of genetic engineering of humanity. It’s not just creepy and megalomaniacal – it seems quite self-assured.

WEF’s interest in genetic transformation of humanity cannot be understated. You will note in the above video, the presence of Jennifer Doudna – the Nobel laureate who (IMO) was most responsible for pushing CRISPR gene editing technology forward. Here is the full video.

I have discussed the technology recently here:

Dear KMAG: 20230213 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Introduction to CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Technology

This is a particularly good explanation for those who want to dig into the science a little.

So how does CRISPR-Cas9 connect to the spike protein?

I have mentioned that the spike not only is proven to have nucleus-opening properties and cell nuclear mRNA-trafficking properties, but it likely has reverse-transcribing properties as well. Thus, it may have utility in facilitating certain varieties of genomic incorporation of genetic material beyond its own spike mRNA. I’m leaving that open very broadly. We don’t really know how far the “nuclear translocation of mRNA” capabilities of the spike protein actually go.

But even just the incorporation of its own instructions into the cellular genome, makes the spike protein highly relevant to CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology.

We can’t REALLY be sure what happens if the spike protein code gets into egg or sperm DNA, and goes on to be a “feature” of every human cell of a “spike baby”, but I can say one thing – if that gene can be REMOVED during in vitro fertilization (IVF) by CRISPR-Cas9 technology, to the betterment of the child, then it’s very likely going to be demanded by elite parents, to assure a healthy baby.

So – I ask again – WHAT ARE THE CHANCES?

What are the chances, that people who are gung-ho on the “solution” of genetic modification of humanity – you know – like WEF – would have anything to do with releasing a virus and promoting a vaccine that would almost FORCE us into that future?

I think that this era is a lot like the chemical revolution of the late 1800s, precisely when Van ‘t Hoff was dealing with chemical theory. Figures like Malone and Doudna operate in the time of our own biological revolution. Remember Rockefeller, and what he did to science and medicine back during the chemical revolution. Well, now we have Gates and what HE did to science and medicine during the biological revolution.

Personally, I think it’s high time for us to stop taking shit from the corporate media – and particularly the “fact checkers” like Reuters and the AP – as they LIE to our faces about science – as they deny reality on behalf of the corporate titans behind them.

These mRNA vaccines are DEFECTIVE relative to how they were sold to us – very likely by intention – and the media and media organizations have LIED to us about those vaccines in the most scurrilous ways. The media has defended LIES and defrauded all of us.

You don’t have to be FOR or AGAINST gene editing per se, to be against LYING, DEFRAUDING, and FORCING IT ON THE WORLD by a criminal conspiracy.

We need to demand TRUTH about the vaccines, or the SHUTTERING of these “media” companies and organizations, which have cosigned onto crimes against humanity.

Demand no less. TRUTH or BREAK-UP. Media that lies and conceals is USELESS and a hindrance to REAL SCIENCE.

W

Are Climate and Animal Rights Extremists Infiltrating Food Processing and Production Facilities on Behalf of WEF?

Sometimes, the answer is right under their nose rings.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-09/protesters-glue-themselves-to-picasso-painting-ngv-in-melbourne/101516560

extinction rebellion banner reads:

“CLIMATE CHAOS = WAR + FAMINE”

The master stroke of the globalists is to create what they want in the name of stopping the same thing. The ultimate satanic deceit.

https://www.powderbulksolids.com/wire-cloth/fire-damages-food-processing-plant

People have been getting scared by the seemingly coordinated yet mysterious disasters in food production facilities. It seems like some kind of scary “phenomenon”. We suspect a human hand, but there seems to be none. It’s as if some mysterious organization like “SPECTRE” or “KAOS” is behind it. Some people have even postulated “DEWs” (directed energy weapons). That’s when I start smelling “disinformation” – likely being planted by allies of actual arsonists and saboteurs. Or is the entire thing just a media effect? Is the Fake News media just playing up “normal” industrial accidents, as a means of “information terrorism” that the media is so skilled at performing for their corporate masters?

Or maybe some of BOTH?

The first time I heard about an egg-laying facility in super-progressive New Zealand catching fire, I realized things were getting very REAL, and potentially UNREAL at the same time. Because of the years of extreme fakery and lies coming from the Ardern regime, I figured something might be up – real or not.

The second time I heard about that egg-laying facility catching fire, a thought fully formed.

You remember those climate activists.

https://www.clevernotes.in/agriculture-geography-environment/climate-activists-protest-by-defacing-art-upsc-892744

I know from certain sources that the FBI was, at one time, very heavy in following the “animal rights” groups and protesters. Ironically, because FBI is extremely woke now, and because agents at a certain level pick their own cases, this enforcement has languished.

Just ask Gail Combs about the tolerance of climate and animal activists by the regime (see comments below, and references to prior posts). They are used in a one-sided war against independent operations and small farmers, on behalf of government and large corporate interests.

Part of the reason governments are not responding well to these arsons of food processors, IMO, is because they are ideologically aligned with the arsonists.

Take Canada, for instance, ruled by “Baby Castro” Trudeau – who is WEF incarnate.

These government agencies are not looking out for us. They’re looking out for the hoaxy, insane, climate narrative, and those who benefit from it.

Anyway, I am creating this post, in part to create a nice tweetable LINK to advance the theory of INFILTRATION AND SABOTAGE/ARSON OF FOOD PROCESSING FACILITIES – likely by climate commies and animal rights activists, in coordination with WEF’s climate and “EAT ZEE BUGS” agendas.

Please feel free to add anything you’d like in the comments. I want to make sure that there is a strong PUSHBACK on these dangerous climate ninnies and their fellow animal rights crazies. Not to mention the evil, insane, and dangerous World Economic Forum, and the evil forces behind it.

If they win, we won’t just be eating bugs. We’ll be eating grass – like my mother did in World War II.

W

See Also:

The Population Control Shot – Understanding the Peoples Climate Temple

In cases of religious mass suicide/homicide, such as Jonestown, Heaven’s Gate, and Aum Shinrikyo, it is very difficult to regain a humanitarian understanding of the key participants after the infamy of defining events sears the conscience and redefines reality. Even more difficult, however, is the opposite – to BEGIN to think the unthinkable and speak …

Tough Tendons, Quincy – Give Us The Proof!

It’s Time to Just Say “NO” to “Unknown Causes”

Arm yourself with knowledge and links to the scientific literature, for that moment when they try to spin the jab death of your friend or relative as mere “sudden death”, and you want an autopsy to prove it was the jab.


There was ONE MORE LAMENT in reply to ONE MORE TWEET about ONE MORE “SUDDEN DEATH” that just pissed me off ONE TIME TOO MANY.

That person made the most AMAZING point.

Remember all those Hollywood tales – those geeky murder mysteries – about noble coroners and medical examiners – those brave pathologists who risked their “gun-free” lives to tell the world the TRUTH about some sinister hidden murder?

Yeah? Well, WHERE THE HELL IS QUINCY NOW?

It’s not like there’s no suspect.

There are THOUSANDS of these tweets – dozens more every week – maybe a dozen a day about FAMOUS PEOPLE. The numbers of obscure, anonymous plebes like us, dying “suddenly” of “unknown causes”, must be a thousand a day, in America alone. Or maybe even more.

YOU KNOW WHAT’S DOING IT, TOO.

So – like what – is Quincy just gonna let ’em all SKATE?

It’s not like we’re even getting ALL TALK and NO ACTION from “coroner world”.

It’s not like we’re even getting NO TALK from coroner world.

It’s more like they’re going out of their way to SHUT UP the talkers.

Seriously – the idea of going after one of the few people who is willing to speak the truth – it’s beyond a travesty.

THEY’RE GOING AFTER THE HANDFUL OF REAL QUINCYS.

Just read this propaganda, if you can stomach it.

LINK: https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/102702



So what do we do?

I say we FIGHT BACK by SAYING NO – our greatest power.

We say NO to their “fake beef”.

We say NO to their “eat zee bugs”.

We say NO to their defective, cell nucleus-penetrating, gene-hacking jab.

AND WE SAY NO TO “UNKNOWN CAUSES”.

BECAUSE WE CAN.

You see, there is another brave pathologist in Germany, who worked with a brave Thai immunologist, also in Germany, to discover and then tell the truth about the vaccines.


I urge you to at least skim this short article that summarizes the situation.

LINK: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/bhakdiburkhardt-pathology-results

For those who prefer videos, here is an initial description of the findings nobody is willing to talk about.

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fHIT55iM4Zv9/


So what’s the point?

The point is that coroners, pathologists, and medical examiners are being FORCED, by the neo-liberal, NEO-SOVIET state, to PRETEND NOT TO KNOW that it’s the jabs.

What these “neo-Bolsheviks” are doing, is to force their insistence that good Bolsheviks “pretend not to know”, on the rest of us, who DO KNOW, and who are willing to admit it.

All you have to do, is to say NO, when the coroners try to pass that bullshit on to YOU.

If YOU have a “sudden death” in your family or circle of friends, you don’t have to take a diagnosis of “unknown causes”, or worse yet, “blame-casting” to lifestyle, climate change, or whatever else they come up with on the fly.

You do NOT have to play stupid to coroner and medical examiner “authority”.

You have the power to FORCE THE CORONER – LEGALLY – to examine for a specific cause of death, and to give you ALL the evidence, by freedom of information. That way, even if they LIE TO YOUR FACE, you can take the results to another pathologist, and have the results CONTRADICTED PUBLICLY.

What you need – when they play dumb – is (1) a lawyer, and (2) SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE.

You need to TELL THEM – ahead of the autopsy, that you EXPECT them to test relevant tissue for evidence of damage by the jab, and if they say it can’t be done, you TELL them you’re going to send them the necessary scientific literature on how to do it, and that you will have the lawyer send it to them by registered mail.

We are giving you the scientific literature now, so that you have it handy. Having a lawyer’s name and number ready, so that you can be “insistent” on an autopsy, is your responsibility.

Here is the relevant scientific literature – in TWO LINKS (plus backups).

LINK 1: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf

LINK 2: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5.pdf


LINK 2a: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5

LINK 2b: https://odysee.com/@SixthSense-Truth-Search-Labs:0/s00392-022-02129-5:f

You can download and print out these two PDF files, so that – in the best tradition of a Quincy episode, you can throw back your 80’s hair and SLAP THAT ROLLED-UP PAPER in the coroner’s chest, and tell him (or her):

“IF YOU CAN’T DO IT, THEN CALL QUINCY!”

They may tell you “it’s expensive”. You laugh in their faces. And then you TELL THEM WHY. Whether you join a future class action suit against Pfizer and Moderna, or whether you go to the Deep State Vaccine Payoff Board, either way, PROOF OF INJURY is how you will get it all paid back, with INTEREST.

Right now, coroners only have “pressure from above” – and that is why they NEVER speak the truth.

WE have the power to push back from below, and to GET THE TRUTH.


So HEY, all you FAKE QUINCYS – here’s a message from MISS QUINCY. As you sit back and let them skate. Just like everyone else.

W

Yes, Virginia, There Really is a Virus, and Here are the Pictures

You may or may not recall my earlier post in defense of the basic idea that viruses are real things, substantially as described, and are not merely a counterfeit construct of the now-obvious fake science, which is clearly inflicted upon us by the liars in charge.

That post was made in response to what I believe is a discreditation campaign of “there is no virus”, which has been promoted within the community of COVID and vaccine skeptics, as well as within the good company of those highly observant election skeptics (see Patrick Gunnels), by the DNC, CIA, CCP, WEF and other corrupt globalist organizations.

This idea of pushing us too far, as skeptics, is very much like what they did to protesters on January Sixth. Pushing the enemy too far is a “go-to” principle in their arsenal of shameful abuse of science, media, and social media. It is an affront to truth and God, but they don’t care.

If you are not familiar with my prior rebuttal of the key points of the there is no virus campaign, I am including the entire article by reference, and urge you to read it – either now, or later, in case you have any doubts about the discrete reality, ready separability, and PHYSICAL ISOLATION of viruses.


Yes, Virginia, There is a Virus

I will try to keep this brief – although that is hard, because I’m fighting against people’s “feelings” instead of facts. When the other side LIES all the time, it creates a “feeling” that they’re lying about everything. Yes, they ARE lying about everything – but the lies are often very sophisticated, being composed of …


The “there is no virus” campaign followed shortly on the heels of several other discreditation operations, including the highly successful “magnetic vaccines” campaign. Having an actual scientific interest in magnetism, I spent a couple of weeks debunking this campaign, which involved my actually taking it very seriously as a starting point. The whole experience of basic scientific discovery was refreshing and fun, and led me to a great understanding of how the enemy works. Several posts resulted.


The Magnetism Challenge: Part I

Wherein we examine, in something like “MythBusters” style, the dubious “Magnet Challenge”, without relying (too much) on the anti-scientific crutch of scientific authority First, a confession. The main reason I am attracted to these videos of people sticking magnets to the COVID vaccination injection sites on their shoulders, is that I love to watch normal …


The Magnetism Challenge: Part II – Scientific Disinformation During the COVID-19 Narrative Collapse

Wherein we look at how the COVID scammers are now using “magnetic” disinformation to try to escape justice for REAL abuse of liposome biotechnology to achieve [most likely contraceptive] vaccine persistence and migration. TL;DR – after mRNA vaccine persistence and anatomical migration were revealed in leaked Pfizer data, explaining “shedding” via persistent liposomes, the COVID …


The Magnetism Challenge: Part III – Suramin: A Lesson in Discreditation of Dissident Scientists and Science

This is for the historical record. I hope that this analysis gets to the “dissident scientists” involved, but even if it never does, future historians will get a powerful look at what I call “Fake Science” – the establishment’s phony, deceptive and controlled scientific complex – and how infiltration, control, and discreditation of dissident populist …


The Magnetism Challenge: Part IV – Spanish-Made Lots of Moderna Vaccine with Magnetic Metallic Contaminants Caught by Japanese Health Ministry

OK. Something is definitely going on. Hat tip to RF121 for finding this. Somebody call Dr. Tenpenny’s lawyer. The Daily Mail may actually owe Dr. Tenpenny and Stew Peters an apology. Just in case Twitter deletes that tweet, here’s an image. So – is this REAL? YES. Most of this story is in Japanese, but …


I also did a post on why FREE SPEECH needs to be tolerant of people who purvey “disinformation”, and particularly those who are under frequent and active discreditation attacks.


Truth Social and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny – a Lesson in Dealing with “Disinformation”

I will try to keep this short. I was very shocked, recently, to find that Dr. Sherry Tenpenny was banned from Truth Social for calling the mRNA COVID vaccines “bioweapons”. Dr. Tenpenny commented back. Let’s take a closer look at that! I can tell you this – by the time I saw this, Dr. Tenpenny …


Thus, don’t get me wrong – I will protect the free speech of both the malicious and innocent purveyors of “misinformation”, “disinformation”, “malinformation”, or whatever – where “whatever” frequently includes TRUTH NOT YET RECOGNIZED. And when there is no truth to be recognized, I find it very important that free speech REMAIN ONLINE, if only to serve as a REFERENCE FOR CORRECTION.

So in the spirit of loving correction of my “no virus” friends, let me begin.


In November of 2022, our wonderful champion of truth in medicine, Dr. Peter McCullough – his nose constantly in the scientific literature – noticed and wrote a post (image below) about a FANTASTIC paper, fully capable of putting to rest the “no virus” position for most honest skeptics.

McCullough even included a handy image, which I reproduce here, in fair use, for your learned examination.

This entire paper is worth digging into. For the benefit of the low-vision, I recommend going directly to the paper (title included below) at these links:

Electron cryotomography of SARS-CoV-2 virions reveals cylinder-shaped particles with a double layer RNP assembly

LINK: https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04183-1

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/hutcQ

The basic idea of the paper is that the researchers FROZE a liquid suspension of the isolated (yes) virus, and then did a very advanced form of electron microscopy on it, completely analogous to the CAT scan they do on you in the hospital, using X-rays. In this fashion, they got amazing PICTURES OF THE VIRUS.

One of the great things that happened here, which absolutely STINKS of real science, is that the researchers didn’t find what everybody expected.

The Earth may be “round”, but the virus is FLAT.

Literally. The virus is only round in two of its three dimensions. It’s shaped like a TABLET, not a sphere.

Hamburger patties. Hamburgers. Oreos. Or even my namesake, MOON PIES.

But consider the ABSTRACT of the paper, and in particular, what I’ve put in BOLD:


SARS-CoV-2 is a lipid-enveloped Betacoronavirus and cause of the Covid-19 pandemic. To study the three-dimensional architecture of the virus, we perform electron cryotomography (cryo-ET) on SARS-Cov-2 virions and three variants revealing particles of regular cylindrical morphology. The ribonucleoprotein particles packaging the genome in the virion interior form a dense, double layer assembly with a cylindrical shape related to the overall particle morphology. This organisation suggests structural interactions important to virus assembly.


A “double layer assembly”?

So that means a DOUBLE-LAYER MOON PIE!

OK – maybe without the middle layer of CARDBOARD that is clearly what moon pies are made of, but still – TWO LAYERS of RNA (or more accurately RNA + nucleoprotein) in the middle.

You can see that very clearly in this graphic from the paper.

Coiled up badly flat like a damned garden hose in a round box. Who’da thunk?

Now – I urge you all to click on THE LINK FOR THE PAPER and skim through it. You will spot ALL of the following listed things, and it will give you a chance to practice reading the scientific literature for yourselves.

In no particular order or location (look everywhere), you will find that…..

  • isolation of the virus is described
  • agreement with prior work is described
  • disagreement with prior work is described
  • how the spike protein is distributed is described
  • a proof that the viruses were not “squooshed” flat is given
  • a way to make the viruses “lay flat” is described
  • several different variants are compared
  • the attachment of the spike protein was found to be ########
  • the size of the spike protein was verified (how?)
  • the porcupines stay the same size, while the number and type of quills may vary
  • there is speculation about WHY the structure is what it is
  • the work was done in #######
  • the peer review was done by at least some number of people
  • different proteins that make up the structure are named

There is a lot more, but I’m going to let YOU discover that.


Now – I am not saying that all skeptics of good faith will be convinced by this evidence, but I believe that most WILL be convinced.

I go back to what Dr. McCullough posted.

The objections to the reality of viruses are referenced in bold; McCullough’s reasoning to the contrary is briefly given in italics, and his final argument in shown in BOTH.


The endless frustrations of the SARS-CoV-2 crisis and pandemic response has led some to push back denying existence of the virus altogether.   Laboratory methods in virology are well accepted and utilize a series of experiments to demonstrate cellular invasion, replication, transfer and repeated infection.  Whole genomic sequencing has aided in identification of variants and subvariants and helped greatly in forecasting what is coming next.  The CDC Nowcast system is an excellent application of targeted sequencing of viral samples.[i]  Nonetheless, some have said if SARS-CoV-2 cannot be cultured like a bacteria and “isolated” then it does not exist.  I have always responded that the principles of laboratory virology, sequencing, and the mass production of viruses such as that done by the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems are concrete processes that rely on the presence of the virus.[ii]  My understanding from the body of medical literature and firsthand clinical experience are consistent with the conclusion that COVID-19 is indeed a unique illness distinguishable from influenza and other viral infections.   I have always been impressed with the absence of bacterial superinfection and micro- and macro-thrombosis being features that separate COVID-19 from influenza and other viral syndromes. Calder, et al, at the Francis Crick Institute has gone a step farther with advanced forms of electron microscopy to see the virus up close and personal. A picture speaks a thousand words and should help even the most skeptical “viral denier” come onto the rational team that is trying to treat high risk patients, end ridiculous contagion control measures, and bring our world back to normal.  


Now, I will join the “deniers” in objecting to the life-saving “virtue signal” that good Dr. McCullough uses to conclude his argument, but I will agree completely – the pictures, supported by an excellent description of how they were gotten, is convincing – at least to me.

IF one is willing to accept the reality of the virus, then there is a huge bonus that comes with it. We now have strong reason to believe that the World Economic Forum (WEF) – a nation-controlling cult of transhumanism – is behind the virus and the vaccines, in pursuit of their bizarre dream of “hacking the genome“. I will be posting a deep dive on that conspiracy very soon. You can get previews on my Twitter timeline. When you read that post, strongly consider getting fully on the “there really is a virus” train, because it does lead somewhere, and helps to explain why WEF did what they did.

Until then, stay skeptical, stay ethical, and most of all, stay ethically skeptical!

W


NOT A VIRUS! They’re homemade pomegranate moon pies!

  1. Wilde, Vicki; Wilde In The Kitchen, Pomegranate Moon Pies, June 28, 2011.

Russia’s Attack on the Western “Allies” of Ukraine, by Outing WEF Support for Pedophilia Using “True Disinformation”

Russia is playing a masterful game against the Western allies of Ukraine, by striking at the very heart of their neo-liberal, globalist, “rules-based” order – the World Economic Forum (WEF).

Russia has found the Achilles heel of WEF – pedophilia – which is a practice solidly rejected by almost the entire citizenry of every country which WEF alleges to represent.

Very soon, WEF’s assets and agents in Western countries will be quite unwelcome, and many trainees and associates will be forced to deny their association with that organization – not only with words, but with ACTIONS.

Russia will have succeeded in becoming a MORAL leader of the citizens of the West, in contradiction to the very governments of those countries. Too late, socialists and communists in those nations will learn that Mao’s essential work on contradiction applies to THEM as well.

Weaker and weaker, the governments of these countries will face citizens outraged at money pouring into Ukraine, working against world peace, as their economies weaken and their societies decay.

By this action, the SECOND PHASE of the fall of Sovietism will occur – the abandonment of Sovietism by Soviet-infiltrated and globalist-nurtured Western nations. That, in turn, will usher in the multi-polar world which appears to be the most scientifically plausible outcome of actual human social development.

Allow me to explain – in one small way – why I believe this is coming, and how it is happening.


It is very clear that WEF provides major support for the LGBT+ agenda which is overtaking the West, but which agenda is being slow-walked in China and actively rolled back in Russia. You will notice that WEF takes great pains to never push too hard on this topic, lest it appear to be leading, instead of merely responding and approving.

“Leading from behind” – as Obama calls it.

For example, in talking about its own “platforms”, the framework shown below is as close as WEF comes to open LGBT+/LGBTI advocacy – Shaping the Future of the New Economy and Society. You can dig deeper for more specifics, but on the surface, WEF is in the closet.

What Russia has done, using one of its best disinformation assets in the West, is to prematurely expose WEF’s true intents on LGBT(P), where P is pedophilia. It did this using a most excellent “true lie”, as you will see.

You are likely familiar with the handiwork of Baxter Dmitry, but you probably never knew or connected the NAME of the master of “fake news” to his amazing product, which fools millions of people every day.


LINK: https://jameshfetzer.org/2022/07/baxter-dmitry-nasa-finally-reveals-the-truth-about-fake-moon-landings/

LINK: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4723006/Fake-story-claims-Linkin-Park-singer-s-death-murder.html


Baxter Dmitry is the absolute master of plausible lies. He finds things which not only COULD be true, but maybe SHOULD be true, and may even BE true, but are probably not, or at least not exactly, and then turns them into fake news.

Such a hilariously “diet” version of evil. And yet, he is, indeed, a bearer of false witness.

What is interesting, if you watch Dmitry long enough, is that his product rarely looks like out-and-out Russian propaganda, but it almost always serves Russian interests. If Dmitry’s work doesn’t weaken and demoralize the Western regimes with lies, it does so with truth.

Now – don’t get me wrong – THAT is not always something that bothers me. For example, while I reject the insane neo-liberal “rules-based order”, I am a complete backer of a “truth-based order” – so anybody telling more truth than the other guy, gets more of my support than the other guy.

How in the HELL does “rule-based order” matter, when the rules literally encode LIES? Such order is no better than “woke AI”, which is FORBIDDEN from finding or acknowledging certain truths that GOD rains down on us. To HELL with your “rules-based order”, founded on LIES.

Take the “Hunter Biden Laptop From Hell“. I don’t care where it came from. I don’t care where it passed, or whether it was “hacked” or “stolen”. I don’t care if Russia, China, or the Vatican gave it to Rudy Giuliani. I don’t care if they got the information honestly, or dishonestly, the latter being something the FBI does routinely.

All I care about, is whether the data on that laptop is real, intact, and TRUE.

See our masthead about how that is determined. By FREE INQUIRY.


“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer


To me, the fact that the FBI honored the DNC-convenient idea of hacked information is bad OVER the idea that true information is good – all that tells me is that the American DOJ and FBI are now CRIMINALS, dodging behind technicalities to hide the sordid truth about their co-conspirator, Joe Biden.

To me, they’re liars, much like Baxter Dmitry. But not EXACTLY like Baxter Dmitry.

To see this, we need to look at Baxter’s very recent, and very cunning “true lie” against WEF.


ARTICLE LINK: https://newspunch.com/world-economic-forum-declares-pedophiles-will-save-humanity/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/oK72D

You can go to the links, watch the following 11-minute video, or read the excerpt below.

VIDEO LINK: https://rumble.com/v23r7bo-world-economic-forum-declares-pedophiles-will-save-humanity.html

I have copied a large segment, but nowhere near the entire article, below.

FROM THE ARTICLE:

A controversial initiative being promoted in the corridors of power by Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum in Davos is set to have families and anyone who cares about children up in arms.

The World Economic Forum is now calling for the decriminalization of sex with children, arguing that laws against “age gap love,” more commonly known as pedophilia, “violate human rights.”

Rather than being a scourge, the pedophilia epidemic that is sweeping the world is actually “nature’s gift” to humanity, according to Klaus Schwab whose World Economic Forum has declared that pedophiles are being created by nature in increasingly large numbers for a reason.

According to a research paper presented at the WEF in Davos, the pedophile phenomenon represents nature’s attempt to cleanse the earth and “save humanity” from itself. Minor attracted people are far less likely to produce large numbers of offspring, according to academic data, and the so-called “underage people” they have so-called “relationships” with are statistically less likely to go on and become heads of large families themselves.

This appeals to the WEF and their vision of destroying the family unit and depopulating the earth.

The WEF, which has ordered the mainstream media to begin pushing the narrative, wants to introduce an international policy that will require the majority of countries to decriminalize or at the very least relax their laws against pedophilia.

The New York Times, always at the forefront of the globalist agenda, ran an op-ed arguing that pedophilia is not a crime.

According to the Times, civil rights protections must be extended to pedophiles. “Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support.”

Not to be outdone, CNN countered with an article proclaiming that pedophiles are not “monsters” or “social deviants living in the shadows.” According to CNN, it’s high-time for society to update its image of pedophiles.

CNN followed up this article with an even more explicit call for sympathy. Rather than considering child molesters the lowest of the low, we should reach out to them and seek to understand them, according to CNN because, they claim, “One cannot choose not to be a pedophile.”

The psychologist Jesse Bering, author of “Perv: The Sexual Deviant in All of Us,” also urges the reader to sympathize with child molesters, writing that people with pedophilia “aren’t living their lives in the closet; they’re eternally hunkered down in a panic room.”

Salon also got in on the act, urging us to meet pedophiles who mean well.

And the BBC, which famously spent decades covering up for Britain’s most notorious pedophile Jimmy Savile, also wants us to think positively about the new generation of pedophiles.

Make no mistake, a co-ordinated attempt is underway to present pedophilia as “harmless.”

What is going on? The media are presenting us with a classic case of the “Overton window.” According to the political scientist Joseph Overton, there is a window within which there are ideas considered “acceptable” by society, tolerated therefore even by those who do not share them. Ideas outside this window are considered “extremist” and not accepted in public debate.

MORE: https://newspunch.com/world-economic-forum-declares-pedophiles-will-save-humanity/


BACK TO WOLF…..

What Baxter Dmitry has done here, is to create a plausible and shockingly believable, but completely over-the-top defense of pedophilia by WEF, and to then accuse them of having said it.

After making this apparently slanderous statement “by” WEF, however, Dmitry then goes into many paragraphs of highly legitimate and accurate reporting on the shilling and soft-pedaling of pedophilia by the media and Western globalist leaders, particularly those with close ties to WEF.

This is a masterpiece of disinformation, because it basically “pre-Epsteins” Klaus Schwab.

What Baxter Dmitry did, was to wrap an accusatory and likely false poison pill, in a whole bunch of connected truth. He sparks the gap of what we don’t know, with what we rightly suspect.

The effect is DEADLY. The article instantly generates megatons of bitter hatred against WEF.

WEF, as far as I know, never publicly said such a thing. Indeed, there are numerous fact-checker websites which vigorously deny it, too – for all that’s worth, now that fact-checkers as a whole have told as many lies as Baxter Dmitry – or maybe more.

I did go to the trouble of searching WEF’s site for anything close to the alleged statements, and they simply are not there, nor anything like them.

SEARCH: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=WEF+age+gab+love+laws+violate+human+rights+tweet&t=brave&ia=news

It would appear that – AS USUAL – Baxter Dmitry is lying.

Lying liars are lying again.








HOWEVER…..

This is where things get even more interesting.


There is a saying which I absolutely HATE because it insults my gay friends. However, I also respect the saying, because it literally came true, when I discovered that some of my gay friends were, in fact, pedophiles.

That statement:

“Scratch a gay, find a pedophile.”

Fact checkers will argue until the cows come home that this isn’t true, but for me, looking skeptically at any gay male has turned out to be one of the FASTEST ways to find pedophiles. Heterosexual pedophiles are – in my experience – much harder to find, and the female brand of heterosexual pedophiles even harder. Although, sadly, their numbers are growing.

My point is, this saying applies to the World Economic Forum as well.

If you go to WEF’s website, https://www.weforum.org/, and do a few searches on LGBT-related topics, buzzwords, acronyms, and the like, you will quickly find that WEF is fully behind the “gay agenda” and the “trans agenda”, pushing nations to adopt it completely.

You will NOT see any kind of open, full-throated support for pedophilia, or even inflammatory support for euphemisms like “minor-attracted persons”.

HOWEVER – just like when you see your gay friend collecting images of “pretty” boys, or catch him grooming teens with anime porn on social media, you can catch WEF shilling for pedo.

FOR EXAMPLE, if you go to this article:

LINK: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/06/lgbti-rights-around-the-world-in-2018/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/od7Qp

…..you will see this section:


Where discrimination is illegal

Only five countries in the world – Bolivia, Ecuador, Fiji, Malta and the UK – have constitutions that explicitly guarantee equality for citizens on the basis of sexual orientation as well as gender identity, according to a 2016 UCLA study.

Five countries – Mexico, New Zealand, Portugal, South Africa and Sweden – have constitutions that provide protections based on sexual orientation.

But globally, there are few constitutional protections for LGBTI rights compared to provisions to protect against gender or racial discrimination, says the study.

Image: Equaldex

General disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of material on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the World Economic Forum concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.

Have you read?

This is where I spotted a critical lead.

Several points need to be made.

In the graph, you will note that dark blue map color = LGBT illegal in some contexts. You can bet money this is referring to pedophilia. It is a VERY sneaky way to refer to it – as “a context” of LGBT. I will explain.

It’s also important to note the general disclaimer. THAT is about the fact that Taiwan is blue, but China is red. WEF is making sure China doesn’t take this to mean that WEF is saying Taiwan is a separate country. Yeah.

But most importantly, look at THIS LINK:

LINK: Mexico’s LGBT rights are stronger than the US’s. Here’s why

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/o9jXd


This article, in its entirety, is an extremely careful SHILL FOR PEDO, under the covers of shilling for constitutional LGBT protections. I urge you to read it in its entirety. However, if you want to see the key part, here it is.


Mexico abolished most discriminatory legal distinctions based on sexual orientation long before the United States. Mexico decriminalised sodomy in 1871, more than 100 years before the US Supreme Court overturned anti-sodomy laws in 2003.

The lone legal discriminatory point in Mexican law was a double penalty for corruption of a minor if it involved homosexuality. This provision was changed in 1998. The United States has no national antidiscrimination laws to protect LGBT people. In 2003 the Mexican Chamber of Deputies unanimously passed a national anti-discrimination law that included sexual orientation as a protected category, established a new agency to enforce the antidiscrimination law, and developed a national anti-homophobia campaign. Moreover, the first article of the Mexican Constitution prohibits discrimination based on “sexual preferences”. There is no explicit constitutional protection for sexual orientation in the United States.


Now, technically, what WEF is complaining about here, is that gay pedo was being doubly penalized as “corruption of a minor”, whereas straight pedo was only [in principle – see below] getting the standard weak sentence for that charge. But in my opinion, we need to go back to the map that got us here from the previous article. What is the difference between Mexico and the United States? LGBT is not “protected in some contexts” in the US. What are those contexts?

PEDOPHILIA.

Child prostitution, now euphemized as “child trafficking”, is RAMPANT in Mexico, and always has been. Young teen prostitutes and porn actresses were notorious in Mexico when I was a kid. However, it was all STRAIGHT. Gay pedo was “discriminated against”.

Now, thanks to progressive activism, pedophilia is protected in “gay contexts” as well, in Mexico. Or perhaps we should say that gay sex is protected in all contexts.

See how that works?

If you look at exactly how much real protection there is for anything LGBT *and* ADULT in the United States now, there is no reason that the US didn’t qualify for “green” in that map, except that “P” and “childhood T” are not protected here. Both – handily – captured by the idea of GROOMING of kids.

Beyond the issue of pedophilia, it’s very fascinating to read that full article, because WEF takes very close notes on two things that should scare you:

  • states are useful for gaining protections for LGBT(P) when national laws are not obtainable
  • religion does not protect the conservative status quo in Mexico, oddly, and WEF seems to think that evangelical Christians are the reason

You can see what these two things mean, and WEF hints at them. FOUR YEARS AGO.

  • WEF will try to subvert individual states in the US
  • WEF will try to subvert evangelical Christianity both in the US and elsewhere

DeSantis striking out explicitly at WEF is a very good thing, because he is definitely going to be a target of these people. However, Protestant churches are now going to be targeted by WEF, and IMO the WEF infiltration will use PEDO, just like they did with the Catholic Church. LGBT gets in first, and then they bring in the PEDO. Are you seeing that? I certainly am.

ANYWAY – back now to the original proposition.

What does this have to do with Russia?


LINK: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11566339/Santa-Putin-features-anti-West-propaganda-video-Russia.html

Russia is an old hand at winning wars using propaganda.

Just like Soviet Russia won the Vietnam war by stoking liberal anti-war and anti-cultural sentiment in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s, Post-Soviet Russia is going to win the Ukraine war by stoking conservative anti-war and anti-cultural sentiment in the United States during the 2020s.

Without getting too deep into that prediction, what we are seeing is Russia’s recognition that America is fundamentally culturally opposed to WEF’s view of the world, while WEF is a driving force behind the entire overexpansion of NATO into the former Soviet Union (FSU).

All Russia needs to do, is to make Americans SEE that WEF is behind the gender and pedophilic insanity that most of America despises, and Russia can further turn America against the WEF-begotten war in Ukraine. At the same time, as WEF weakens, China rises, taking control of WEF, as it has taken control of the UN.

While WEF most likely never said PUBLICLY the crazy things that Baxter Dmitry accuses them of saying, it would not surprise me at all, if Russian intelligence has VERBATIM picked up those very same ideas in WEF cyberspace and internal discussions. These ideas are fully consistent with the kind of thinking WEF engages in.

The ideas of “pedophile saviors” is not only perfectly satanic, but when couched in a Malthusian evolutionary context, it sounds brilliantly just like Yuval Harari – you know – the very creepy, gay, vegan, Israeli transhumanist who functions as a kind of Rasputin of Klaus Schwab.

LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIVTf-C6oQo

The more you listen to this guy, the more you see him taking humanity over a cliff, in a kind of Hitlerian hubris that seems like something straight out of the 1940s.

WEF was clearly WAY out over their skis, and Putin nailed them in mid-air.


So where does that leave us?

In summary, what Baxter Dmitry has done, possibly with Russian direction, assistance, or intelligence, is to simply fill in the public blanks, by applying scratch a gay, find a pedophile to the LGBT(P) insanity of the World Economic Forum, at a time when that culturally aggressive and hyperprogressive organization is clearly linked to all manner of recently revealed evils, including vaccine techno-fascism, sneaky depopulation, sociobiological warfare, climate terraforming, energy cultural revolution, destruction of food sources and supply chains, financial eco-bullying, rampant corruption, criminal corporate swindling of the middle class, unbridled transhumanism, woke AI, militant veganism, globalist warmongering, treasury-raiding, taxation without representation, blatant censorship of obvious truth, and rabid antitheism (to be distinguished from mere atheism – practically a blessing in comparison).

Almost EVERY human has something to fear from WEF. It’s too easy.

All Putin has to do is hold up a cross, and he wins.

W

The Ongoing January Sixth MKULTRA Experiment on Patriots

I just realized something horrible, which makes it even more imperative that we either get our American prisoners out of DC Gitmo, or ask our military to bomb a certain building conducting inhumane experiments on American prisoners of war.

The House, now under Patriotic American control, needs to stop pussyfooting around. The fastest way to make the evil communist DOJ give up its hold on our patriotic Americans, is to make their friends in CIA sweat for what it is doing to our fellow Americans. The CIA hates exposure, so it’s time to expose.

I am absolutely convinced of the following.

Part of the reason patriots are being slow-walked in DC Gitmo, is so that they can be experimented on by the CIA.


First, some background on CIA human experimentation.

You may or may not be familiar with a documentary which the CIA absolutely HATES, called “The Minds of Men“, by an outfit called Truthstream Media, otherwise known as a couple of filmmakers named Aaron and Melissa Dykes.

This documentary explains, very calmly and rationally, an important PART of the broad and comprehensive research program called MKULTRA. In particular, it discusses the secret history of CIA human experimentation on American mental patients, fronted through a bunch of ingenious American university scientists, who never got Nobel prizes, because their important but shocking work was basically kept on the down low by the CIA and the elite who funded it. This was all very typical of how scientists are ABUSED by politicians, corporations, spies, and “higher powers” (i.e., rich elites, secret organizations, etc.).

The Minds of Men makes all the connections, all the way back to the elite, and it will blow your minds.

Unless things have changed recently, you cannot get this DVD on Amazon, because Amazon is Bezos, and Bezos clicks his heels to CIA orders.

You have to get the documentary mailed directly from Truthstream. In any case, it’s very eye-opening. The CIA has deep ties to American university research, and the whole “CIA recruiting on campus” fake controversy is basically a kind of cover, assisted by dupey communist agitators, who likely have no clue that the CIA which helps run communism in America, is already deep in the universities, and has been from the beginning.

Anyway, today, our friend Aubergine posted a new video by Truthstream, which is this:

If you watch this, you will get a sense of Truthstream’s style, which is very patient and visually reinforcing, so that their message really embeds. It’s worth skimming the above, if you’ve never seen The Minds of Men. That documentary is very much in the same style.

This video is great, of course, and if you watch it, you will realize that it’s extraordinarily “meta” and ironic in regards to this very post. However, that’s tangential to my point.

Aubergine pointed out the new video’s discussion of the Stanford Prison Experiment, in which pretend prison guards abused pretend prisoners. You should already be getting some vibes here.

Gail Combs responded, first quoting Aubergine:

“…it was a real social experiment in which some college students were assigned to play guards while others were to be prisoners. It is most notable for the fact that although it was supposed to last two weeks, it had to be terminated after only six days because the “mistreatment of prisoners escalated so alarmingly.””…”

and then making this connection to January Sixth:

Think of the Jan 6th Political prisoner where the guards KNOW there will be NO REPERCUSSIONS FOR THEIR BEHAVIOR… -Gail Combs

That is when I realized suddenly what is going on.

https://tv.gab.com/channel/trump_won_2020_twice/embed/a-secretly-recorded-video-is-leaked-628e6947996a4c915e8a1998/preview

All of the January Sixth prisoners have reported maltreatment at the hands of guards, appalling living conditions, isolation, and other forms of abuse.

However, SOME of the prisoners have also reported on the PROPAGANDA to which they are being subjected. And I’m not just talking about being forced to watch only CNN, or having been given leftist “defenders” who try to talk them into parroting DOJ propaganda to get out.

In particular, after much initial isolation from the world, they are then given very “read-only” tablets, which are loaded with typical “donkey com” propaganda – pro-left, pro-Islam, anti-Christian, etc., etc.

They don’t get to choose what information they get. They only get REGIME INFORMATION. And when it’s interactive, like these tablets, it has to be like Facebook on steroids.

This was immediately clear to me as CIA experimentation. Let me explain why.


The CIA didn’t just experiment surgically on mental patients, using university scientists. They did a LOT of experimentation on prisoners – both Americans and foreigners. How do I know this?

By reading this book:

This book is what is known as a “limited hangout” by CIA. It’s actually very easy to tell what they’re hiding and what they’re not, by reading it, if you go in with the idea that the CIA actually HELPED this book get written.

The basic idea of the MKULTRA hearings back in the 1970s, was to make people think that the project was an old, discredited, FAILURE. Lots of shiny objects in the way of nasty and seemingly pointless experiments, drugs, sex, and mistreatment of CIA personnel BY other CIA personnel were provided.

This is how the CIA closes out a successful project, and makes the success “disappear”.

Kinzer’s book is just more of the same, updated for what has already leaked out or been figured out, since the MKULTRA hearings. New scandalous clickbait information in the same directions, plus a few harmless new angles, help to make it look like:

  • MKULTRA was an abject failure
  • benzodiazepines and modern super-opioids never existed
  • drugged hypnosis and “brainwashing” never worked
  • everything CIA worked on was stupid, bizarre, and “paranormal”
  • Sidney Gottlieb didn’t know what he was doing, and just messed around
  • there was no real plan to MKULTRA
  • there was no successor to MKULTRA
  • the experimentation was mostly on captured foreign spies
  • the experimentation on American prisoners was just stupid LSD trips

Very typical limited hangout. Deny, deny, deny all the successes.

The reality is that Sidney Gottlieb was an excellent top-level researcher, much in the same vein as Oppenheimer, and when tasked with a formidable technical challenge, approached it from all the best logical angles.

The successes of MKULTRA were substantial

  • brainwashing techniques on par with the Soviets and Chinese
  • expertise in drugged hypnotic debriefing and programming
  • ability to suppress conscious memories
  • ability to implant false memories
  • ability to program mental patients to commit crimes
  • strong understanding of human brain electromagnetics
  • strong understanding of psychology, memory, altered states

If you prowl around on this site, searching in the search widget on MKULTRA and similar, you will find much information about those successes, including my personal experiences with the technology, shortly AFTER it was declared “case closed” in the late 1970s. The drugs most likely used are NEVER mentioned in the Kinzer book. Kinzer is New York Times. Yeah he had great contacts – and they either used the hell out of him, or he’s part of their game. I don’t really care which, or need to know.

So how does this fit in with January Sixth?


The Kinzer book does not mention the shocking brain surgical experimentation on American civilians discussed in The Minds of Men, but it does talk about drug experiments on:

  • captured foreign spies during the early cold war
  • Whitey Bulger and other American criminal prisoners

This is why I’m very confident that we’re seeing experimentation on Trump supporters in DC Gitmo. What kind of experimentation do I suspect?

  • typical social stuff – study of resistance to isolation, maltreatment, reward/punishment
  • searching for “John McCains” who are amenable to “reform” / brainwashing
  • drugged hypnotic interviews while sleeping (see my own experience here)
  • social media psychological experimentation (Facebook stuff) using the “tablets”

I suspect that the “American Soviets” who run DOJ and CIA are very busy studying these captured patriots, trying to figure out how to turn them into good socialists.

DC Gitmo = Hanoi Hilton

I suspect that if DC gulag prisoners are given this knowledge, they will be able to think back and realize exactly how they were experimented on by their communist keepers.

Congress, or course, can demand information, but expect that if they are given anything, it will just be limited hangouts.

Nevertheless, it should be interesting to hear from the J6 prisoners themselves, what was done to them, once they realize that they were being experimented on by communists.

W

PS – the CIA is always dumping massive amounts of CHAFF on MKULTRA, to cover up the reality. Don’t believe everything you hear about it – especially the stuff that seems “too attractively controversial”. Shiny objects, IMO. I will discuss that, shortly.