“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
Well, they can lock us out of The Q Tree, but they can’t stop the truth from getting out.
Enjoy a post first over on The U Tree and now HERE.
Here is a quickie in my WAR ON REMDESIVIR.
Fellow Treeper barkerjim dropped an interesting document today, from back in July, which showed the NIH mentioning black sheep IVERMECTIN on the same page as REMDESIVIR.
Such a beautiful misdirection. These guys are MAGICIANS.
This is a perfect example of my postulate that fighting FOR ivermectin will not yield results for restoring real science as fast as fighting AGAINST remdesivir.
In fact, I would go so far as to say that the enemy realized that getting us to fight FOR the saving drug would keep us from expending our energy fighting AGAINST the murdering drug that kills us off and gives them money for doing it.
You may recall my previous posts about remdesivir.
My next piece was going to be an expansion on Karl Denninger’s recent post which places remdesivir/ivermectin and remdesivir/hydroxychloroquine in the context of Anthony Fauci and the disturbingly similar case when he was “all about AIDS” – namely, AZT/bactrim.
YES. As Cthulhu has said before, “This is not Fauci’s first rodeo.”
Before there were hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as innocent victims – good Samaritans accused falsely before the world – there was BACTRIM.
And there was FAUCI on all of them. AZT played the murderous part of remdesivir long before we forgot that “miracle drug”.
However, this new information from barkerjim’s drop right here needs to get out right away. The Q Tree site was brought down YET AGAIN as I started working on this, and again when I resumed, so I know it’s critical stuff. The ChiComs have a huge investment – both financial and military 4GW – in the American-killing drug remdesivir. They WILL protect it.
We know from doctors and scientists quoted in my first two articles, that remdesivir has a horrible track record – shocking, really – of renal toxicity. Studies of the drug against Ebola were TERMINATED because it was killing people in the hospital.
How déjà vu.
But here it comes again.
I read the same study results that the above celebratory announcement was made over. Those results were nothing to cheer about, with shot kidneys just the horrifying icing on the death cake. In my opinion, the results were far WORSE than any prior results for hydroxychloroquine. The results – to me – made HCQ look EXCELLENT in comparison.
Yes – by controlling what is acceptable science and what is not, Fauci was able to force the world to field a BAD, DANGEROUS DRUG that made money for Gilead, over a safe, mildly (but critically) effective drug, that made money only for the generics industry, and a French company.
And to top it off, Fauci USED Trump, who could do absolutely nothing about it, to take a KILLER drug into market as the ONLY way to treat his little pandemic.
So let’s take a look at that page dropped by barkerjim. I have captured it as SIX IMAGES.
As you can see by our comments on The U Tree, most people will look at this table and think they are seeing positive and reasonable behavior by NIH. Adverse events are being discussed, and it appears that things are “even-handed” between different drugs.
And that is EXACTLY the style in which EVIL ABOUNDS IN WASHINGTON, DC (or Atlanta). Good and evil are forced into compromises where GOOD LOSES and EVIL WINS – but the result is called “meeting in the middle”.
CLOSER INSPECTION of the table gives you this, under Adverse Events for remdesivir.
Nausea
ALT and AST elevations
Hypersensitivity
Increases in prothrombin time
Drug vehicle is SBECD, which has been associated with renal and liver toxicity. SBECD accumulation may occur in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment.
Each 100 mg vial of RDV lyophilized powder contains 3 g of SBECD, and each 100 mg/20 mL vial of RDV solution contains 6 g of SBECD.
Clinicians may consider preferentially using the lyophilized powder formulation (which contains less SBECD) in patients with renal impairment.
This is some of the most remarkable “medical misinformation” I’ve ever seen. It’s truly a work of art.
NIH has HIDDEN – completely hidden – the pronounced renal toxicity of remdesivir. They have hidden it COMPLETELY. It’s GONE. What you are seeing there – the talk about renal and liver toxicity – is a BLAME-SHIFT to a substance that is used WIDELY in intravenous formulations, called sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin, or SBECD for short.
This substance is an EXCIPIENT.
An excipient is a substance that is used to MIX with a drug, and take that drug into a form where it can be ADMINISTERED easily. Thus, an excipient may DISSOLVE the drug, or help to dissolve it, into a liquid form. It may help POWDER the drug, so that it can be pressed into tablets or filled into capsules.
Excipients are often considered “inactive ingredients”, even though – YES – they very much can change the effective amount of a drug that the patient gets.
If I had to describe SBECD as something, it would be as a DETERGENT FOR DRUGS. It’s a kind of SOAP made from a cyclodextrin, instead of from some kind of fat or lipid.
Cyclodextrins are rings of sugar molecules that falls somewhere in between being a smaller chain sugar (like sucrose) and a starch. Cyclodextrins have lots of uses, because they form tubes that act like waffle cones for other molecules. Febreze uses cyclodextrins to trap molecules which have unpleasant odors, at the same time that they release more pleasant ones. A genius application, quite frankly.
Thus, if you make a SOAP that has a little waffle cone for drugs, you can EASILY get drugs to dissolve into a concentrated liquid form by using that soap.
See those sidechains hanging off the cyclodextrin ring? Those are the “SBE” part of SBECD. They are typical of DETERGENTS.
This SBECD stuff and things like it are VERY useful for delivery of drugs. AND they’re relatively safe, too. They are rapidly excreted through the kidneys. Yeah, you don’t want a SOAP piling up in your blood if your kidneys are not working, and THAT is the fact that is being TWISTED by NIH when they say:
Drug vehicle is SBECD, which has been associated with renal and liver toxicity. SBECD accumulation may occur in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment.
Did you catch that sleight of hand? I’m gonna show it to you.
What exactly is causing the renal problems in the FIRST PLACE that you MAY have to be careful about, so that you don’t build up the excipient FOR IT, which MAY constitute a FURTHER risk?
REMDESIVIR.
It’s a crafty little lie. If you have good kidneys, you don’t have anything to worry about with this SBECD crap. But if you have bad kidneys, the LEAST of your problems is SBECD buildup. It’s the remdesivir IN the SBECD that’s gonna kill you.
Weakened kidneys do NOT need to be hit with remdesivir.
Which doesn’t even work ANYWAY. Except to keep people LONGER in the hospital.
Now what you SHOULD be getting, when they administer remdesivir, at the point where the VIRUS is basically gone, and you’re dealing with spike protein damage, cytokine storm, and all that nasty crap, are antiinflammatory, antithrombotic, and immunomodulatory drugs. Even HCQ (a known antirheumatic) at reasonable doses had some antiinflammatory effect in late-stage hospitalized COVID cases, although steroids and other things work better.
When the virus is basically gone, and a bunch of its CRAP is left behind, there is no point administering a toxic antiviral like remdesivir, other than to send money to Gilead Pharmaceuticals and their Deep State friends.
Now, let me stop here and validate this stuff.
HERE is a link that explains how SBECD can be filtered out of blood ANYWAY if a patient has renal impairment.
Do you see what that means? SBECD is a nothingburger. It’s a DEFLECTION.
The renal problems of remdesivir are never mentioned, by quickly bringing up the risks of the excipient due to the unmentioned damage BY remdesivir.
What NIH did here was to quickly point their finger at THE OTHER GUY and said “HE DID IT!”
This is pure politicized science, where the politics is to defend the drugs and vaccines that enable the shared profits of both the Deep State and the companies that NIH, CDC, and NIAID are in bed with.
Let’s go back to that link I just gave you. THIS part of the conclusions comports very nicely with the reality of SBECD as a widely used excipient.
The finding that SBECD can be effectively removed by CVVH is clinically important, because some cyclodextrins have been associated with hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity due to vacuolation [3]. Although our study was small, no evidence to suggest SBECD as a cause of hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity was demonstrated in our study patients. This finding is consistent with other SBECD safety studies in humans [3,18]. Additionally, animal studies have only been able to demonstrate cyclodextrin toxicities when dosages more than 50-fold greater (3,000 mg/kg) than those used in humans were administered [3,19,20]. Unlike other cyclodextrins used in these animal studies, SBECD undergoes only minimal tubular reabsorption and limits concentrations within the intracellular tissues of the kidney, potentially reducing the risk of nephrotoxicity. Nevertheless, the FDA labeling for voriconazole recommends that IV therapy be avoided, if possible, in patients with a CrCl <50 ml/min [5]. Our data suggest that IV voriconazole can be safely administered in this population if the patient is concurrently undergoing CVVH.
Delafloxacin, a fluoroquinolone, has activity against Gram-positive organisms including methicillin-resistant S aureus and fluoroquinolone-susceptible and -resistant Gram-negative organisms. The intravenous formulation of delafloxacin contains the excipient sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin (SBECD), which is eliminated by renal filtration. This study examined the pharmacokinetics and safety of SBECD after single intravenous (IV) infusions in subjects with renal impairment. The study was an open-label, parallel-group, crossover study in subjects with normal renal function or mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, and those with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis. Subjects received 300 mg delafloxacin IV or placebo IV, containing 2400 mg SBECD, in 2 periods separated by ≥14-day washouts. SBECD total clearance decreased with decreasing renal function, with a corresponding increase in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞ ). After IV delafloxacin 300 mg administration, SBECD mean total clearance was 6.28 and 1.24 L/h, mean AUC0-∞ was 387 and 2130 h·μg/mL, and mean renal clearance was 5.36 and 1.14 L/h in normal and severe renal subjects, respectively. Similar values were obtained after IV placebo administration. In subjects with end-stage renal disease, delafloxacin 300 mg IV produced mean SBECD AUC0-48 values of 2715 and 7861 h·μg/mL when dosed before and after hemodialysis, respectively. Total SBECD clearance exhibited linear relationships to estimated glomerular filtration rate and creatinine clearance. Single doses of IV delafloxacin 300 mg and IV placebo were well tolerated in all groups. In conclusion, decreasing renal function causes reduced SBECD clearance and increased exposures, but SBECD continues to exhibit a good safety and tolerability profile in IV formulations.
“In conclusion, decreasing renal function causes reduced SBECD clearance and increased exposures, but SBECD continues to exhibit a good safety and tolerability profile in IV formulations.“
Now, the above is not the only “New York Times” style trick that NIH plays here.
Let me list, without going into long-winded explanations, my additional favorites.
The table authors note that clinical drug-drug interaction studies have not been done, but nonetheless, they say “CQ or HCQ may decrease the antiviral activity of RDV; coadministration of these drugs is not recommended.1” – with a hanging reference.
For three OTHER potential drug interactions, communications from Gilead are cited as sufficiently exonerating. One is a non-competing generic steroid (dexamethasone) and the other two are patented big pharma antivirals from corporate “frenemy” Genentech. The interaction and “C-level mind-melding” between these two companies is very interesting. Look who just went from one to the other. Interesting times.
Some crafty shade is thrown at ivermectin by citing a possible adverse event risk and then retracting it, lawyer-style: “Neurological AEs have been reported when IVM has been used to treat parasitic diseases, but it is not clear whether these AEs were caused by IVM or the underlying conditions.” Meanwhile, the DEMONSTRATED risks of remdesivir are not even mentioned.
Bottom line – NIH is protecting Gilead on the toxicity of remdesivir, and they used FAKE NEWS tricks to do it. I keep telling people – science journalism is bad, and science governance is WORSE. It’s been CHINATIZED and OBAMATIZED.
And until there IS justice, we will drag the CRIMES of Anthony Fauci and Gilead “Pharmaceuticals” and their SLEAZY ASSOCIATES thorough the headlines, over and over, until people SPIT IN THEIR PATH as they walk down the streets.
So where do we begin?
Let’s take a brief look at ZYKLON D.
This is the molecule of remdesivir, a.k.a. Zyklon D (as in DEMOCRAT). This is the drug that is killing Americans – primarily “Deplorables”, in the hospital.
The shading of parts of the molecule is significant, and I’ll get to that in a future article. The shading is more significant in a NEW way, than it was in the original way.
If you remember NOTHING ELSE from this article, remember this.
Hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, and ivermectin TOGETHER over their entire histories have not killed as many people as remdesivir kills in a SINGLE DAY.
In fact, I’m sure it’s significantly less, but I leave the exact numbers as an exercise.
What’s really nasty there, is that OUR tax dollars are being used to PAY HOSPITALS to murder us with remdesivir. As long as hospitals use this WRONG drug at the WRONG TIME (which I will explain) to kill OLD TRUMP VOTERS, they get money from the federal government.
But if hospitals use the RIGHT drug at the RIGHT time, they don’t get the cash.
So what do HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATORS – who more and more are NOT DOCTORS – do? They do what you EXPECT them to do. They do NOT do the right thing for patients.
(H/T Gudthots and GAB)
This has been a part of the general phenomenon of the “lawyering of science”. Has it made science better?
I don’t think so.
It’s beyond evil, but hey – when you have a mafiosa in charge of not only the purse strings, but the “quiver”, these sorts of things happen.
Impeachahontas Now Wearing Two Diapers Nobody expected Chris Wray to play Mafia Nan’s queen of diapers face-up on January 6, but that is exactly what appears to have happened. The only question now is WHY. To quote a friend from a former life, “AYE-YI-YI!” OK – let me back up a bit. First, I want …
And then there’s the “medical mafia”.
Do you see Trump with his hands tied over there? He had to let that jackass on the left declare that a terrible drug recruited to MURDER old Republicans was “the new gold standard of care”, because the murderer is a member of “SES”, and can’t be fired. The medical mafioso can tell whatever lie he wants, and nobody can do anything about it.
Of course, maybe it IS the “GOLD STANDARD” for DEMOCRATS and HOSPITALS.
Yes, the EVIL in charge of this nation is fairly impressive. Moscow has NOTHING on Washington.
But back to the new “secret euthanasia drug”, remdesivir.
“When you go to a hospital, even if you don’t have COVID-19, you’d be construed that way,” says Renz during his program “Lawfare with Tom Renz” on Brighteon.TV. “They get hundreds of thousands of dollars for putting you on remdesivir, putting you on ventilator and letting you die. And if you don’t follow, they’ll just intimidate you and coerce you.”
His guest on the program, Nancy Ross, has experienced that firsthand. Ross has been given the power of attorney to act on behalf of Veronica Wolski, a known patriot from Chicago who recently died from COVID-19 at AMITA Health Resurrection Medical Center.
Ross says the hospital wanted to intubate Wolski and put her on ventilator, and the doctors kept telling that every time they see the patient. “They kept reminding her of that instead of talking about other possible treatment,” says Ross, referring to the ventilator. “I just couldn’t get it.” (Related: Overreliance on ventilators led to coronavirus deaths, study shows.)
According to Ross, Wolski had been asking the hospital to give her ivermectin but her requests had been repeatedly denied.
For the uninitiated, the only treatment for the disease approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) involves remdesivir. It is approved for use in adults and children at least 12 years old who weigh at least 88 pounds (40 kilograms).
Remdesivir is an antiviral medication that targets a range of viruses. It was originally developed over a decade ago to treat hepatitis C and a cold-like virus called respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Remdesivir is not an effective treatment for either disease, but it has shown promise against other viruses.
It works by interrupting the production of the virus. Coronaviruses have genomes made up of ribonucleic acid (RNA). Remdesivir interferes with one of the key enzymes the virus needs to replicate RNA, preventing the virus from multiplying.
However, up to 31 percent of patients who received remdesivir have developed multiple organ failure and/or acute kidney failure. “Remdesivir was pulled from clinical trials because it’s too dangerous. It’s just a disastrous drug,” says Renz.
Doctor admits 99 percent of intubated patients die
Renz also shares a message he has just received about a recording from a doctor admitting that 99 percent of the patients they intubate have ended up dying. “These are just bad treatments. They just kill people,” he says.
Many hospitals are also giving COVID-19 patients with midazolam, which is questionable at best as it depresses a person’s ability to breathe. It is most frequently used before surgeries or procedures to decrease anxiety, cause drowsiness, and help with anesthesia in patients who need tubes or machines to help them breathe.
Midazolam has an FDA black box warning, which notes that the medication has been associated with respiratory depression and arrest because it can slow or stop breathing.
Ross says they also requested to give Wolski the budesonide treatment, but the hospital instead gave the patient a generic brand, which is not the best thing to have under that circumstance.
Wife dodges ventilator, survives COVID-19 with budesonide treatment
A husband from Georgia has had a better success in forcing a hospital to give his wife the budesonide treatment.
The husband named Mick tells Clay Clark during “Thrive Time Show” on Brighteon.TV that his wife has made it out of the intensive care unit two days after getting the budesonide treatment and has been able to go home in a week.
Mick says his wife is in really bad shape after a week of battling symptoms of COVID-19.
“She’s 57, has a partially collapsed lung and has preexisting conditions. Her blood oxygen was 50 and her blood pressure was 100/50,” said Mick. The normal blood oxygen level is between 94 to 99 percent. Anything below 90 is considered to be low blood oxygen.
“I went on battle mode immediately. I thought ‘this is it,’” said Mick, fearing that his wife would be put on a ventilator in which very few patients had survived.
After talking with Bartlett, Mick sends the hospital a fax message asking to put his wife under the budesonide protocol – which is 1 milligram of budesonide every eight hours. He also sends a copy to the doctor treating his wife, as well as a lawyer.
Mick cites several studies and a magazine article about the budesonide protocol, but he thinks that what catches the hospital and the doctor’s attention is his threat of escalating the matter to the ethics committee if they don’t grant his request.
Budesonide reduces COVID-19 hospitalization
Researchers at the University of Oxford has found that early treatment of inhaled budesonide reduced the need for urgent care and hospitalization in people with COVID-19 by as much as 90 percent. The study has also found that inhaled budesonide given to patients with COVID-19 within seven days of symptoms reduces recovery time.
Participants allocated the budesonide inhaler has had a quicker resolution of fever, symptoms and fewer persistent symptoms after 28 days. The study has also demonstrated that there’s a reduction in persistent symptoms in those who received budesonide.
Doctors have prescribed budesonide for more than 20 years as preventive medicine for asthmatics. Bartlett has written a paper with case reports describing favorable outcomes for two of his patients with the regimen. A lab study in the U.S. has also shown that budesonide inhibited the ability of a coronavirus to replicate and inflame the airways.
[Back to Wolf]
If, after reading all that, you’re STILL not suspicious that maybe remdesivir is problematic, then please read my previous article.
I have been a poor and rotten servant of the Lord during my too long and too miserable life. I have made innocent women cry. I have led others astray. I have turned away from those in need in their time of need, and I have lied to myself and to God about why I …
In the prior article, there is a VIDEO that explains how remdesivir WORSENS pneumonia by shutting down the kidneys. The people who killed Veronica with remdesivir are NOT telling you that. They are HIDING the fact that Veronica Wolski was KILLED BY REMDESIVIR, but the effects of kidney-failure-induced pulmonary edema LOOKS like bacterial pneumonia.
It LOOKS like the disease did it, but it’s really the DRUG. Fauci gets away with what he CAN get away with.
He’s not a doctor. He’s an administrator. As his CLASSMATES have said many times.
But let’s say that Veronica Wolski actually DID have real pneumonia – AGGRAVATED by remdesivir kidney shutdown. THAT is exactly why Didier Raoult used AZT along with hydroxychloroquine – as a rapid attack on ANY bacterial pneumonia that might develop. So AGAIN – had Veronica gotten the RIGHT DRUGS right away, she would not have died.
In fact, AZT plus even OTC antihistamines (which prevent pulmonary inflammation) will prevent death by COVID-19, as long as the patients DON’T get remdesivir.
In that previous article I did a very fast proof that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) works, demonstrated at a national and international statistical level (the “Lancetgate effect”), but I just glossed over Prof. Didier Raoult’s first communication on the efficacy of a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin (HCQ + AZT) to prevent DEATH by COVID-19.
Here is Raoult’s comment on the uncovering of the Lancetgate fraud. Note that Raoult’s work was never attacked directly (which would have been scientifically suicidal), other than to say that his sample size was “too small” (not in my opinion) when he first communicated his findings.
Hydroxychloroquine is NOT a standard antiviral like acyclovir, remdesivir, and most of the other “vir” drugs, which are all based on what can best be described as “ringer” nucleotides, nucleosides, and nucleic acid bases.
Here is acyclovir, which as a “fake nucleoside” is very easy to understand. You can see where the name comes from – it’s an “acyclic” version of guanosine, where part of the ribose ring has been REMOVED.
Now the part they say about “without affecting the normal cellular processes” is NOT actually true. There are plenty of papers on the side effects of acyclovir. Those side effects are not USUALLY all that bad, but they are VERY REAL because acyclovir DOES impact normal cellular processes.
There are VERY FEW drugs which impact ONLY the processes of viruses, cancers, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, trypanosomes, flukes, helminths, ticks, fleas, lice, and other parasites, and do NOT at all impact host (that means US) cellular processes.
In fact, it’s not easy to say WHICH processes are purely HOST processes, and which OTHER processes are parasite processes. Host processes turn into viral processes by their ABUSE, and one of the BEST ways to stop viruses, is to simply stop the HOST processes that help the virus, until IMMUNE PROCESSES have time to identify, target, and DEFEAT the virus.
Under these tactics, the larger organism can WIN by not giving the virus what it needs.
VIRAL DENIAL IS A VALID TACTIC.
I hope that’s clear. Targeting ANY host process which helps the virus, and doesn’t hurt the host too badly when sabotaged, is a VALID way to stop a virus and beat a disease.
Most antivirals work by disrupting viral GENETIC processes, by serving as bogus pieces in RNA or DNA construction. They are like styrofoam or rubber links that create weaknesses in steel chain.
It doesn’t really matter exactly WHEN and exactly WHERE the “vir” type antivirals cause things to fail. They are simply SABOTAGE LINKS in the nucleic acid chains that viral construction depends upon.
Here is remdesivir’s sabotage molecule:
ATP is adenosine triphosphate – a critical molecule for both genetic construction AND energy transfer.
Remdesivir leads to the construction of a FAKE version of ATP (called RDV-TP above) which has two points of sabotage. One is an added cyano group – the other is an altered ring structure that cannot hydrogen bond properly, because one nitrogen has been removed, and another has been relocated.
It’s too bad that remdesivir is so toxic, but that’s the sad reality of drug discovery. MOST potential drugs have a lot of side effects, and are not all that safe.
Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are not all that good as antivirals, in my opinion, BUT they have the GLORIOUS property of being VERY safe. That is part of why they’re considered essential medicines for their normal uses against LARGER parasites (trypanosomes, flukes, helminths, and mites).
BOTH of those drugs have good postulated NON-STANDARD mechanisms of antiviral action – meaning these drug molecules are not bogus genetic building blocks – they disrupt something else. There is some debate on exactly how these drugs work, but it doesn’t really matter, as long as they work.
There are reasonable explanations of how they may work, there is empirical evidence that they DO work, and they are known to be safe at effective doses.
These drugs are SAFE TO USE.
Now – this is where TIME comes into play.
The main problem with remdesivir is that it is used TOO LATE in the viral process. It SHOULD be administered early in the process, on an outpatient basis, like hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. The reason is fairly obvious. If you attack a virus after it has already multiplied, you can’t stop the damage it ALREADY DID.
REMDESIVIR BOMBS A VILLAGE OF SURVIVORS AFTER THE TALIBAN CAME AND LEFT.
Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, administered early, are like sending in a platoon of commandos right after the Taliban shows up.
Which strategy is going to give the most survivors?
This is a no-brainer. You don’t need a Ph.D. to see this. And yet, literally, THOUSANDS of American Ph.D.s cannot SAY this because they’re afraid of losing their jobs, their reputations, or their potential for advancement.
Thankfully, I’m retired, so I can speak the truth.
Now, as a scientist who GETS relative importances, I can see how to FIX remdesivir. I TOLD them how to fix remdesivir in spring of 2020. Let me explain this YET AGAIN.
I take note especially of the horrible record of side effects (especially total kidney failure requiring dialysis and transplant) of remdesivir in hospitalized patients – who get high doses of remdesivir because they have high levels of virus (or low POST-INFECTIVE levels, but again – the people behind remdesivir are not being logical if we take them at face value).
The fact of the matter is that remdesivir has to be given I.V. – it cannot be given orally. That is the EXCUSE for giving it so late.
But IF it was given earlier, remdesivir could be given in lower doses that would probably work just as well as HCQ or ivermectin.
That is all that is needed. Protect people from death. Less drug because less virus. Less side effects because less drug. And it’s not like a doctor’s office can’t administer a lower, safer, yet STILL intravenous dose of remdesivir on an outpatient basis. EARLY.
They never did this.
Why not?
Now, I believe it’s because curing people with remdesivir was NEVER the intent of the primary conspirators.
Profit, obviously, for many participants, is the “legitimate” motivation. But there is more.
Secret euthanasia of “useless eaters” with remdesivir WAS their intent. And that “authority” to inject people (either literally or practically) against their will requires a hospital setting. The hospital setting creates the EXPECTATION OF DEATH – and that is how they get away with it.
The people who COULD have changed things to administer remdesivir when it would have been safer did NOT, because they were either cowardly, brainwashed, politically impeded, monetarily motivated, or part of the actual conspiracy.
SO – bottom line – if you feel that you have to go to a hospital, DO NOT go unless you are assured that your doctor can treat you with drugs that YOUR DOCTOR wants to treat you with, including ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, budesonide, and antibody cocktails.
These are the things that ACTUALLY WORK. And are ACTUALLY SAFE.
Just in case Twitter deletes that tweet, here’s an image.
So – is this REAL?
YES.
Most of this story is in Japanese, but there is enough good translation that it’s very clear what happened. There is room for more journalism here, and I would certainly know the right questions to ask, and if we pump this up just a bit, I think Japanese YouTubers (super red-pilled) will start asking the right questions and getting us some answers.
YUMIKO URASAKI and YUKO NOMURA, Nikkei staff writers
August 26, 2021 04:48 JST
Updated on August 26, 2021 15:22 JST
TOKYO/ NEW YORK — About 1.6 million doses of Moderna’s coronavirus vaccine have been taken out of use in Japan because of contamination reported in some vials, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare said early Thursday.
Several vaccination centers have reported that vaccine vials contained foreign matter, according to an announcement from the ministry, which added it will seek to minimize the impact of the withdrawal on the country’s inoculation program.
The ministry said later in the day that the substance that had been mixed in may have been metal. “It’s a substance that reacts to magnets,” a ministry official said. “It could be metal.”
Takeda Pharmaceutical handles distribution of the U.S.-developed Moderna vaccine in Japan.
Nasdaq-listed Moderna confirmed receiving “several complaints of particulate matter” in vaccine vials distributed in Japan but said it had found “no safety or efficacy issues” related to these reports.
“The company is investigating the reports and remains committed to working transparently and expeditiously with its partner, Takeda, and regulators to address any potential concerns,” a Moderna spokesperson told Nikkei, saying the drugmaker believed a “manufacturing issue” at a plant in Spain was the cause.
The vaccine lot in question and two adjacent lots have been put on hold “out of an abundance of caution,” the spokesperson said.
The Japanese ministry has not halted the use of Moderna vaccines in other batches, deeming them safe.
Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga told reporters on Thursday afternoon that he had instructed the ministry to look into the case with safety as the top priority, adding he had received reports that the withdrawal “won’t have a significant impact on the country’s vaccination campaign.”
The Moderna vaccine was granted emergency-use authorization in Japan in May.
So – what do we know from this article?
Lots totaling 1.6 million doses of Moderna REMOVED for “particulate matter”
The foreign substance could be metallic
The foreign substance reacts with magnets
The removal amounts to the problem lot(s) and two adjacent ones
Problem was found at multiple vaccination locations
Moderna statement says “no safety or efficacy issues”
Moderna is working with Takeda (drug company) in Japan
Moderna is blaming a “manufacturing issue” at a plant in Spain
Other Moderna batches are going forward in Japan
Problem has been escalated by journalists all the way to Prime Minister Suga
Now – I wanted to get more information on this, so I went to the “vanilla” Nikkei Dot Com site.
This is the first article I could find that was clearly related to this story.
[Paris = joint] On the 26th, Spanish pharmaceutical company Robi, who was involved in the production of a new coronavirus vaccine made by US Moderna, issued a statement on the issue that a foreign substance was found, and the lot where the foreign substance was found is only in Japan. It was revealed that it was delivered.
He said he would continue to cooperate with the investigation, saying it could have been caused by one of Robi’s production lines.
Robi has a consignment contract with Moderna. For vaccines delivered outside the United States, the final process is to fill bottles with raw materials manufactured by a Swiss company at a factory in the suburbs of Madrid, the capital of Spain.
So what else did we learn here?
A contractor named Robi outside Madrid, Spain, filled the lots for Moderna
Those lots are destined for all nations outside the United States
Robi says that ONLY Japan received the problem vials of vaccine
The materials to fill the vials are manufactured by a Swiss company
DAVOS is in Switzerland
When you search on “davos” in Brave Search, you get the following page
OH! Our old friends at the WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. Or the “Weffen SS”, as I like to call them.
One of the top sponsors of that curiously timed “exercise”, Event 201.
Are you starting to see a pattern here?
I don’t particularly BELIEVE Moderna or Robi on this. I would be cautious about believing Takeda. I definitely think that the Japanese health ministry is more believable than the CDC. There is NO WAY that the CDC would have announced this, IMO.
NOW – at the bottom of the translated page, are some links to other articles about the story:
There is also a link to a “Members Only” English article mostly behind a paywall, but that turns out to be the English article we started with (Article 1). But I also found a FIFTH article.
Here’s the stuff:
Foreign body of Moderna vaccine, some may be metal Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
August 26, 2021 3:20 (August 26, 2021 15:04 update)
For US Moderna vaccine, some products will not be inoculated = Reuters
The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare announced on the 26th that it will postpone about 1.6 million doses of new coronavirus vaccine made by US Moderna, saying that it was found to be contaminated with foreign substances. Some have already been vaccinated, but no health hazards have been reported at this time. The details of the foreign matter are being confirmed by Moderna.
On the same day, the ministry revealed that the substance that had been mixed in could be metal. “It is a substance that reacts with magnets and may be a metal,” he said. There are several inoculation sites in Japan where foreign substances were found, but some of them reported such reports.
Since mid-August, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited , which handles domestic supply, has reported foreign matter contamination from eight venues in five prefectures: Tokyo, Saitama, Aichi, Ibaraki, and Gifu. It includes large-scale workplaces and local government venues. In each case, a foreign substance was found by confirmation before inoculation. Vaccines containing foreign substances will be collected by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and sent to Moderna for investigation. The survey results have not been released yet.
Inoculation is postponed for the production number 3004667 (about 570,000 times), which was reported to be contaminated with foreign substances, and the vaccines of 3004734 (about 520,000 times) and 3004956 (about 540,000 times) manufactured on the same line. All are produced in Spanish factories. Delivery destinations are 863 venues. It is said that there are reports of rubber pieces being mixed overseas as well.
The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare explains, “I think that foreign substances were mixed in during the manufacturing process. The health risk is not so great.” We have determined that other Moderna vaccines can be used without problems. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company will continue to supply alternatives. “We will try to minimize the impact,” such as delays in inoculation.
Modelna “No safety or effectiveness issues have been identified”
[New York = Yuko Nomura] On the 25th, U.S. biopharmaceutical moderna said that a part of the company’s new coronavirus vaccine supplied to Japan was found to be contaminated with foreign substances. No safety or efficacy issues have been identified at this time. “ The company’s public relations responded to inquiries from the Nihon Keizai Shimbun. “We have confirmed that there have been multiple reports of particulate matter in one of the production lots of vaccines distributed in Japan. Two adjacent vaccines to prioritize quality assurance. We have also withheld the inoculation of production lots. “ Regarding the future, he said, “We are currently investigating the problem and will respond promptly and transparently with the affiliated Takeda Pharmaceutical Company and regulatory authorities.” Moderna outsources vaccine filling and finishing to Spanish pharmaceutical company Laboratorios Pharmaceuticos Robi.
COMMENTS: The charming appearance of “Modelna” makes me realize that Google’s AI likely has a slight accent in information space. Just more proof that “artificial” is a poor distinction of intelligence.
The Tokyo Metropolitan Government announced on the 26th that it was using the target lot of the US Moderna vaccine, which is suspected of being contaminated with foreign substances, at the Nogizaka venue in Minato-ku, Tokyo, and at the workplace inoculation for employees in the Tokyo Metropolitan Government Building. At the Nogizaka venue, about 2,800 people were inoculated from the 18th to the 25th, and about 6,300 people were inoculated after the 17th in the workplace inoculation. The relevant person was informed of the vaccine adverse reaction consultation center by e-mail or other means.
The Nogizaka venue will suspend the vaccination on the 26th and resume the vaccination using another lot of vaccine from the 27th. The inoculation date for those who were scheduled to be inoculated on the 26th will be set separately. It is said that the use of the relevant lot was stopped for workplace inoculation in the Tokyo Metropolitan Government Building, and the inoculation was continued by switching to another lot from the 26th.
Regarding the announcement by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare on the 26th that the use of some new coronavirus vaccines made by US Moderna was discontinued, Ibaraki Prefecture revealed that the product was being used at two large-scale inoculation sites. Gunma Prefecture announced that some of the relevant products had been delivered to the prefectural vaccination center, but said they were not using them and could replace them with other vaccines.
In Ibaraki, a pharmacist discovered small particles mixed in at the Prefectural Medical University (Ami Town) on the 23rd, and took measures to collect them without using them …
This article is for members only. You can read more by registering.
August 27, 2021 2:00 (August 27, 2021 5:09 Update) [Paid members only]
A foreign substance was found in the new coronavirus vaccine made by US Moderna. No health hazards have been confirmed at this time, but the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare has requested that the use be postponed for about 1.6 million times, which may be contaminated. All Nippon Airways (ANA) and others have suspended vaccination. The ministry believes the foreign material may be metal. We want to reduce the impact on vaccination, so we will hurry to take measures such as alternative supply.
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company , which is responsible for the domestic supply of Moderna vaccines, has been in Tokyo, Saitama, Aichi, Thorns since mid-August …
This article is for members only. You can read more by registering.
1356 characters left
WOLF: Now – while I was going through these, I found one more ENGLISH article.
PARIS (Kyodo) — A lot of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine doses in which contaminants were detected had only been shipped to Japan, the Spanish manufacturer for the U.S. biotechnology company said Thursday.
“The detection of this particulate matter refers to certain vials of one product lot distributed exclusively in Japan,” the Spanish pharma company Rovi said in a statement, adding it is conducting an investigation into the matter and cooperating with health authorities.
As a precaution, Japan suspended Thursday the use of around 1.63 million doses of Moderna vaccine after contaminants were found in some unused vials.
Both Moderna and Japanese drugmaker Takeda Pharmaceutical, which is in charge of the sale and distribution of the vaccine in Japan, said they had not received any reports regarding safety issues.
“The origin of this manufacturing incident may be in one of Rovi’s manufacturing lines,” said the company. “As a precaution, this lot and two adjacent lots have been put on hold.”
Under a contract with Moderna, a Rovi factory in the suburbs of Madrid handles the final process of vaccine production for doses shipped outside the United States, filling the bottles with raw materials produced by a Swiss company.
WOLF: While looking at that one, I found more MINOR articles based on automatic searches in the web page (“you might be interested in….”).
Hamamatsu City announced on the 26th that it was using the vaccine with the target serial number in the mass inoculation of “Zaza City Hamamatsu” over the problem that a part of the vaccine made by US Moderna was contaminated with foreign substances. It was used for about 17,000 people from August 14th to 21st. The city explained, “Before using it, I always check it visually and find no foreign matter. Please be assured.” Vaccines to be used at the venue in the future do not include those with the target serial number.
On the 26th, Fukui Prefecture was found to have a foreign substance mixed in a part of the new coronavirus vaccine made by U.S. Moderna, and about 10,100 doses of one of the lots that were not used were distributed, of which about 6,600 were Announced that it has been inoculated. In Toyama Prefecture, 1100 doses have been delivered, of which 780 have been inoculated. There are no reports of health hazards in either prefecture at this time.
In Fukui Prefecture, a total of about 5,300 vaccines were inoculated by the joint inoculation of six workplace inoculation establishments and small and medium-sized enterprises carried out by the prefecture, and a total of about 1,300 inoculations were given at the large-scale inoculation site in early August. There are no reports of foreign matter contamination by visual confirmation when the vaccine is placed in the syringe. A person in charge of the prefecture said, “Since each venue has stock (of vaccines that have no problem), it seems that the vaccination schedule will not be affected for the time being.”
According to Toyama Prefecture, a total of 1100 doses were delivered to some workplace inoculation venues in early August, and 780 doses have been inoculated. A person in charge of the prefecture said, “I heard from the company that there is no effect on the speed of inoculation so far.”
WOLF: I will comment more on my theories of what is going on below. But before I do, I’m going to simply reference my prior posting about “magnetic vaccines” and “graphene oxide”.
Wherein we examine, in something like “MythBusters” style, the dubious “Magnet Challenge”, without relying (too much) on the anti-scientific crutch of scientific authority First, a confession. The main reason I am attracted to these videos of people sticking magnets to the COVID vaccination injection sites on their shoulders, is that I love to watch normal …
Wherein we look at how the COVID scammers are now using “magnetic” disinformation to try to escape justice for REAL abuse of liposome biotechnology to achieve [most likely contraceptive] vaccine persistence and migration. TL;DR – after mRNA vaccine persistence and anatomical migration were revealed in leaked Pfizer data, explaining “shedding” via persistent liposomes, the COVID …
This is for the historical record. I hope that this analysis gets to the “dissident scientists” involved, but even if it never does, future historians will get a powerful look at what I call “Fake Science” – the establishment’s phony, deceptive and controlled scientific complex – and how infiltration, control, and discreditation of dissident populist …
At this point, I don’t really know the answer to this question. I’ve only been studying it for a few hours. However, given the sordid track record of the Faucisphere in government, the duplicitous alien planet Big Pharma, and that wonderful global organization of medical liars and policy-reversing Tedros types, the United Nations of China, …
UPDATE: And PEGylated Graphene Oxides! WE THE PEOPLE have a right to know the TRUTH. What is actually in these vaccines? What are they doing to people? What are they REALLY doing to people? Why are public health officials LYING to us? I am going to begin explaining why I believe we are now at …
So What the Heck is Going On?
I’m going to wait and comment more definitively later, so that people can offer up their theories without worrying about what I’m thinking. Besides – I want to sleep on this.
Originally, I was very sure that “magnetic vaccines” was disinformation. I did a lot of thinking on how it MIGHT be true that jabs could show ferromagnetic activity, but it just seemed unlikely that anybody would put ENOUGH iron or ferrite into a vaccine.
On top of that, my own experiments with magnets sticking to my NOSE due to adhesive forces, showed me how oily skin really works to STICK the flat surface of a neodymium magnet. That was a great experiment in psychology.
Then came graphene oxide – a separate (I think) question. I thought that the ONE vial of Pfizer that was analyzed in Spain, which was found to contain MOSTLY graphene oxide, was intentionally sabotaged with excess graphene oxide to prevent analysis of the ACTUAL level of graphene oxide.
But what if I’m wrong? Karen Kingston thinks these people are just evil, and don’t mind doing Tuskegee-like experiments on us.
What if there is some weird magnetic crap in these vaccines – possibly as a tracking technology?
As a scientist, I’m willing to change my mind. But as a victim of a lot of Deep State shenanigans, I’m also skeptical of disinformation.
Something is clearly going on here. This is not just a case of somebody sticking a magnet up to a vial of dry vaccine and static electricity doing something weird or unexpected.
People on the Moderna side are admitting and reacting.
But we don’t really have enough details about what is going on.
SO – with all that said – what do YOU think is going on?
That is the ultimate TL;DR – the title. You can take that and walk away with an understanding of the situation in three parts.
Want to know more? Stick around. It’s a coming post. But I want people to get the TL;DR NOW, before Monday, because things are going to start popping HARD.
WHAT’S COMING
The left, the Bidenoids, China, the controllers, the globalists, the industry profiteers, and the scammers have NO WAY TO GO BUT FORWARD.
Getting vaccinated is the most important thing you can do to protect yourself and the people around you from the Delta variant of COVID-19. Find a free vaccine near you at https://t.co/4MYpWqXVVo.
— President Biden Archived (@POTUS46Archive) July 25, 2021
Anybody who wants to avoid the HELL they have planned, both SOCIAL and BIOLOGICAL, has NO WAY TO GO BUT OFF THEIR TRAIN.
If’ you’re wondering why this guy (below) was picking up signals of potential SHTF, my guess is that is is due to an upcoming information collision.
I believe that smart people associated with the military are picking up scientific speculation about vaccine problems, and realizing that this conflicts with their knowledge of Bidenese commitment to jabbing all Americans.
Jabbing them with vaccines that increase morbidity toward the future of an evolving disease.
It’s a relativity problem in disease. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. I think the ChiComs SAW IT.
This situation has to be at the top of CCP’s wish list for America.
Recent information is pretty much confirming all levels of skepticism about the vaccines. The BIG PICTURE is exactly where and how they fail, due to SHIFTING BACKGROUND of the disease, however that happens, which doesn’t matter. It could be natural. It could be China. It could be ANYBODY. This is a “beautiful attack”. It’s a case of forcing the victim to self-destruct.
Biology we understood in the 1960s, before the Soviet/Maoist takeover of media, education, science, etc., is still operating.
You don’t make a vaccine for a cold, because it’s HARD, UNNECESSARY, and they all have PROBLEMS.
American science, industry and government were all WEAPONIZED TO OVERREACH. To run their blade of modernization through air, and then through themselves.
*And One Study Showing How Much of a SCAM Fauci’s Beloved Remdesivir Actually Was
The old wisdom of science and medicine, from when I was a kid, has never been disproved. Stated simply:
Disease-conferred immunity in the recovered is always superior to any form of vaccination.
This is why, when we were kids, most scientists and doctors were “unimpressed” by the idea of moving to vaccines for the three main childhood diseases, which diseases themselves provide LIFELONG IMMUNITY against three illnesses that are MUCH ROUGHER on adults.
Why go to a lesser immunity? The diseases are mild in children. The outcomes are excellent. The immunity is SOLID.
Now you can push around the edges of this generality, and find examples where individuals DON’T get good immunity from a “first case” of a disease, and catch it again, whereas some other person gets life-long immunity from a vaccine. Nonetheless, the generality holds at the statistical level, and has always held, because it is LOGICAL.
The whole point of vaccination is to provoke a SUFFICIENT DEFENSE by a LESSER ASSAULT than the disease being prevented.
Thus, for the generality of the old wisdom to be violated, logic, math, and basic biology have to be overturned.
Which is not hard with Democrat minds.
Democrats want to believe things that are politically expedient but simply untrue. I wish I could say the same accusation cannot be leveled against our side, but I can’t. Nevertheless, I find that I can gently correct our side with actual scientific logic, whereas the other side demands “authority”, which they instantly deny to any person or organization that disagrees with them. It’s a solid defense, but it’s not a REAL defense.
In any case, communism is “politics as religion”, and thus it can lead to articles of hope and faith that are held in violation of common sense and widely agreed simple facts – even the most basic science that can be proven at home by anybody.
Thus, the much more solid and honest wisdom of 1960s and 1970s medicine and science began to disappear as the Soviets and Maoists began chipping away at it. By now, it’s in real trouble.
With the COVID hoax, I pretty much thought science was done for. Surprisingly, in the wake of the hoax’s general failure to convince EVERYBODY that up is down and vice versa, we are seeing more and more of the sheepish scientists and doctors who initially went along with things, turning around and disagreeing – although very gently – with the COVID madness.
I would like to show you SIX important points that are now known from scientific studies. You will not see the Bidenistas and Bidenazis trumpeting any of these.
What these points do, is basically show why we don’t need COVID vaccines, nor a particular bad drug called remdesivir.
Indeed, in my opinion, all of these things call into question the entire COVID response, and appear to make it some kind of scam – likely by the World Economic Forum.
I believe that the scam is for global population control, the latter meaning both control of people and control of reproduction.
I’ll explain that at the end, but a bit along the way, too.
PS – thanks to Wheatie for the above image, to RF121 for the link to 4 of these papers, and to Wheatie again for information about the Rockefeller Foundation censoring “misinformation” through Red Jen and Actor Vivek.
Six Points, To The Point
1 – Disease-conferred immunity appears to be 6.72 TIMES as strong as immunity from the COVID vaccines
2 – mRNA vaccines cause spike protein to begin circulating in the bloodstream almost immediately
3 – The antibodies raised by COVID vaccines show pre-existing “memory” immunity to COVID and the vaccines
4 – 99% of those infected by C19 show fast, specific, and effective (“robust”) antibody response
5 – For 2-shot vaccines, shot 1 needlessly elicits memory antibodies, but shot 2 dangerously elicits prompt antibodies
6 – Remdesivir does NOT work against COVID, but it does lengthen time in the hospital
OK, people. Let me break down THOSE items with fuller descriptions.
Six Points, Explained
1 – Disease-conferred immunity appears to be 6.72 TIMES as strong as immunity from the COVID vaccines
Yeah, gotta love those insignificant digits. SEVEN WILL DO – roughly.
This is from an Israeli study that looked at all the people getting infected right now. You will recall that almost all Israelis are vaccinated, yet all of a sudden, people are getting it again – which means that most of them have to be (and in fact WERE) vaccinated.
It turns out that, among the people who are getting COVID in Israel right now, are a few people who had it already – but VERY few of them. If you do the numbers, then it’s clear that catching the disease provides better protection than the vaccine. This is hardly unexpected – like I said – this was old school predictable knowledge back in the 1960s and 1970s.
Stated differently: “Catch a cold one year, you probably won’t catch it again next year, or the year after.”
COMMON. WISDOM.
The number may be a quibble – earlier estimates were actually HIGHER than a factor of 7. So this is a conservative estimate.
But let me repeat what I said. This is exactly what we expect from colds and flu bugs. EXACTLY.
Bottom line, they tried to take something that we already knew, and repackage it as something new and scary. Now, it’s easy to see that this was all about keeping and gaining power over us.
2 – mRNA vaccines cause spike protein to begin circulating in the bloodstream almost immediately
This is actually one of FOUR papers cited in a frontline doctor organizational email, which was then explained in the now-famous video by Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi.
If you have NOT seen this video, you should watch it. If you have seen it, then what you will be reading here (the next 4 points) is what he’s talking about, but related more directly to each of the 4 papers.
The email that describes the 4 papers will be included as an appendix. It describes the significance of the 4 papers, but I am restating that significance in my own terms, here, from my own perspective.
In my opinion, this first point shows exactly why the mRNA vaccines are so problematic, and were never a good idea. Not only is there a ton of vaccine migration PROVEN by the Pfizer leaked documents – there is massive spike protein circulation in the bloodstream. This spike protein activity circulating throughout the body is clearly the cause of all the problems associated with the vaccine.
In my opinion, it’s not a mistake. I believe the manipulated purpose of the vaccines was in fact incremental population reduction by flushing very early pregnancies on a huge but statistically significant scale.
3 – The antibodies raised by COVID vaccines show pre-existing “memory” immunity to COVID and the vaccines
This is a SMOKING GUN. What this means is that all the health authorities LIED to us about a lack of pre-existing immunity. The vaccines are immunizing people to something they are already somewhat or even completely immune to.
Read that again. “Asymptomatic cases” = “basically already almost completely immune”.
Remember early in 2020, when a lone, old, distinguished professor of immunology in Europe dared to publish online a STATEMENT (no way could he get it into a journal) that only pre-existing immunity could explain what we were seeing clinically with COVID-19, and his letter was then censored everywhere?
He is proven COMPLETELY RIGHT in this paper.
Now that we can carefully study new infections with COVID-19, it turns out that people are responding to the disease as “something they’ve seen before”. Yes – it’s THAT similar to the other weak beta coronaviruses.
As many have said, the disease was not actually novel. It was JUST NOVEL ENOUGH. Just novel enough, thanks to gain of function, to win the race for the seasonal best-seller. It’s like a new paperback romance that breaks no new ground as either literature or love-porn, but simply puts tiny tweaks on something everybody has seen before.
Fifty Shades of Nonfluenza.
I repeat. This was a WEAPONIZED COLD – a “new” cold – and THEY KNEW IT.
This was an ECONOMIC ASSAULT on the world. And likely by the World Economic Forum.
Which incidentally sponsored Event 201.
You FUCKERS.
4 – 99% of those infected by C19 show fast, specific, and effective (“robust”) antibody response
The point here was that EVERYBODY who gets COVID-19 – including those who barely have any symptoms or NONE AT ALL – get excellent antibody response – and they SHOW IT. The antibodies may go away, leaving the strong and effective MEMORY antibodies on standby, but the system is soon primed and ready to go.
Which then raises the question – in combination with the prior points…..
Wouldn’t most healthy people just want to get the DISEASE instead of the vaccine? They get better immunity, proven, even if they have ZERO symptoms.
We were SNOOKERED.
This goes back to something that the Fake News media and Fake Medicine CDC hid from us.
When antibody tests first became available, there was an apparent hesitation by authorities (particularly in blue states) to release results. HOWEVER, there were several “blooper” releases of information from hospitals and doctors – at least one of which was forced into disavowing their own prior statement.
What they were finding was double-digit numbers of people who already had antibodies to COVID-19. At that point, the antibody tests were SUPPOSED TO BE unique for COVID-19, and NOT for the prior beta coronaviruses. But yet, they showed antibodies for 30% of people or HIGHER. Later, authorities (including CDC) badmouthed the antibody tests as being flawed because they were picking up antibodies to “other coronaviruses”.
NOW it is completely possible to see what they were trying not to admit. Between prior exposure to both COVID-19 itself and strains of the other 4 weak beta coronaviruses, people were ALREADY IMMUNE.
OLD ANTIBODIES WORKED ON COVID-19.
You see what I’m saying? They would rather falsely “admit” that the tests were “not working”, than to truly admit that the tests worked TOO WELL, and most of us were already immune to COVID-19 to varying degrees. Why? Because that would eliminate the FEAR.
They reframed the PROTECTIVE cross-strain immunity as a test problem, rather than a natural immunity blessing.
It was all about the election. It was all about government control.
It was all a LIE and a HOAX.
5 – For 2-shot vaccines, shot 1 needlessly elicits memory antibodies, but shot 2 dangerously elicits prompt antibodies
This part is actually rather interesting. This is a point that Dr. Bhakdi makes late in his video. The first vaccine shot is NEEDLESS but HARMLESS. Well – more or less. Most people are actually IMMUNE TO THE VACCINE.
Yeah, I want you to read that again.
They can reframe reality – I WILL REFRAME IT BACK.
When you inject somebody with a needless vaccine to which they are already immune, the people simply have an immune response to the assault. Yeah, you can call it a booster, or whatever, but the point is that you have caused the immune memory to replay an old tape and pump out antibodies that work IN GENERAL on your new COVID strain. Vaccine. Whatever.
But the second injection, coming shortly thereafter, is potentially WORSE than NEEDLESS. With two injections, the first kicks up fresh antibodies to spike protein. The second infects YOUR cells and makes them a target of those antibodies.
This is why we saw all those people DIE after their second injection.
THEY. DID. NOT. NEED. THAT. SECOND. INJECTION.
Yeah, this will be a good fight in science – AND the courtroom.
Frankly, I think there need to be lawsuits here, for anybody who would have had a normal contraindication to a second shot, which IMO should have been ALL diabetics, cardiovascular patients, etc. In fact, many of those folks should not have gotten a first shot, because IMO the people that COVID didn’t kill in spring of 2020 were mostly immune, INCLUDING diabetics.
They didn’t need the vaccine. And the vaccine – especially the second shot – killed them.
And hey! If it had been ok to criticize vaccines earlier on social media and not get kicked off, we might have discovered this earlier, and saved a few lives! And dollars!
But no, we live in a fully Orwellian world, where Polish pink diaper that censors people telling the truth about vaccines gets AWARDS for protecting free speech.
6 – Remdesivir does NOT work against COVID, but it does lengthen time in the hospital
This is just “sweet revenge” as Ted Nugent called it. KARMA.
Now I have to admit that I was just as fooled as Trump on this. Fauci – what a scammer.
I saw in the very earliest results that remdesivir was WORSE than not working – it was removing people’s kidneys faster than COVID was. AYE-YI-YI. Bad stuff.
And yet Fauci had the BRASS ASS to go on national television and call remdesivir the “GOLD STANDARD” after that performance. Sheesh! Trust me – Trump saw it, too. This was CLASSIC “you have to show them”.
Admittedly, to some extent, this was “fighting the fear”, and you can see why the POTUS has to take part. But who was generating the fear?
Yeah. Much easier to see the controlling characteristics of the hoax NOW.
Anyway, scientifically, the problem is, there is no point in giving people an antiviral like remdesivir AFTER the virus has already created devastation. You have to deliver the antiviral EARLY – exactly like Dr. Zelenko realized very early on.
Doesn’t matter what KIND of an antiviral – even a piss-poor one, or an atypical one, like hydroxychloroquine, is going to WORK if it gets there EARLY. Late – it simply doesn’t matter.
Now the thing is, remdesivir has to be INJECTED. It could only be used in a HOSPITAL setting – or at least, so they said. I disagreed. People inject stuff in SUBWAYS. Let’s get SMART here.
Well, as a CHUMP HONEST SCIENTIST, my thought was, why not simply administer remdesivir early, by injection, at a lower and safer dose, on an outpatient basis, upon diagnosis? In the doctor’s office, or at a specialist. Nothing worse than a blood draw. Same time that people are being given hydroxychloroquine, or regeneron. It would actually WORK then.
WELL, you see, this paper does more than just prove that remdesivir doesn’t work. I proves WHY they never did the logical thing with it.
Administer it early and effectively, and you don’t SELL AS MUCH. Administer it late and desperately, and you sell a TON of it. And it’s expensive as HELL.
Oh. My. God. I was such a chump. I assumed they would do the right thing if they knew what that was.
The pharmaceutical industry, at this point, is CRAVEN. THEY JUST SELL PRODUCT.
Y’all remember how Fauci bullshitted Trump about remdesivir – how he lied about moving the goal posts? Helps if you know the full story about it, but here’s new evidence that the shit’s actually harmful.
In my opinion, it is now time to call this crap out.
This is one of the most needless vaccines ever – one of the worst outcomes for a vaccine ever – no matter which one – and it is BECAUSE COVID-19 is fundamentally a case where there should not BE a vaccine for most people.
This is a case that was KNOWN not to be very amenable to a vaccine. It was only by a FEAR PSYCHOLOGY OPERATION that we were scammed into accepting the idea that we needed a really badly performing COLD VACCINE.
It’s a MONEYMAKER for industry – their PAWN MOTIVE – and a CONTROL AGENT for various levels of government – their PAWN MOTIVE. Ultimately, it’s about a global effort to gain control – most likely being mediated through the World Economic Forum, since almost all the guilty parties are either “partners” like Google/Alphabet or “organizations” like the Rockefeller Foundation.
And THAT is where we find the really basic motivation for the COVID hoax – as a PLATFORM of human control.
Once I realized that Bill Gates created Windows not as an operating system, but as a PLATFORM to change human behavior into a path he created, I realized the power of creating PLATFORMS. It’s a GOD THING.
You see, the mandatory vaccine platform is basically “The Island” where the entire planet is “The Island”. The people in control are liars, they can inject you with whatever they want, and they then have power of life and death over you, because they lie with impunity.
To start with, I believe the globalist scum are introducing a kind of limited, very incremental contraceptive.
TL;DR – you MUST listen to a short podcast of a scientist revealing the latest research on the spike protein vaccines. The VACCINE ITSELF (not just the spike protein – the mRNA vaccine itself) is persistent and is not only concentrating in ovaries – THE VACCINE ITSELF IS EXCRETED – e.g., in breast milk. Meaning …
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …
Using Principles of Protein Equivalence and Analogy as Predictive Tools for Coronavirus Understanding Surely you’ve heard of the BROWN RECLUSE SPIDER. The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that …
Now – if you followed that patent history work that Dr. David “Bowtie” Martin did on the coronavirus and vaccines, then you realize that they’ve been aware of the spike protein for TWENTY YEARS. Its CONTRACEPTIVE activities had to have been known – likely from before understanding of the spike protein per se, when coronaviruses were just viruses which caused potentially contraceptive symptoms in some patients.
This is a no-brainer, people. We have been manipulated.
W
John Fink and James Coburn discuss case in a scene from the film ‘The Carey Treatment’, 1972. (Photo by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Getty Images)
Appendix: The Letter
Letter to Physicians: Four New Scientific Discoveries Regarding the Safety and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines
SCIENTISTS CONCLUDE THE BENEFIT OF COVID-19 VACCINATION IS “HIGHLY DOUBTFUL” BUT VACCINE INJURY IS “WELL SUBSTANTIATED”
Doctors for Covid Ethics has sent the following letter to tens of thousands of doctors in Europe, summarising four recent scientific findings critical to the COVID-19 vaccination program. The letter explains each finding as it relates to the biology of COVID-19 vaccines, including interactions with the immune system.
Taken together, the letter warns that these new pieces of evidence force all physicians administering COVID-19 vaccines to re-evaluate the merits of COVID-19 vaccination, in the interests of their own ethical standing, and their patients’ safety and health.
A video explanation of the underlying immunology by Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD is here, with German subtitles here.
*
Dear Colleague:
Four recent scientific discoveries are herewith brought to your urgent attention. They alter the entire landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic, and they force us to reassess the merits of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.
Summary
Rapid and efficient memory-type immune responses occur reliably in virtually all unvaccinated individuals who are exposed to SARS-CoV-2. The effectiveness of further boosting the immune response through vaccination is therefore highly doubtful. Vaccination may instead aggravate disease through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
Discovery 1: SARS-CoV-2 spike protein circulates shortly after vaccination
SARS-CoV-2 proteins were measured in longitudinal plasma samples collected from 13 participants who received two doses of Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine [1]. With 11 of the 13, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was detected in the blood within only one day after the first vaccine injection.
Significance. Spike protein molecules were produced within cells that are in contact with the bloodstream—mostly endothelial cells—and released into the circulation. This means that a) the immune system will attack those endothelial cells, and b) the circulating spike protein molecules will activate thrombocytes. Both effects will promote blood clotting. This explains the many clotting-related adverse events—stroke, heart attack, venous thrombosis—that are being reported after vaccination.
Discovery 2: Rapid, memory-type antibody response after vaccination
Several studies have demonstrated that circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA antibodies became detectable within 1-2 weeks after application of mRNA vaccines [1–3].
Significance. Rapid production of IgG and IgA always indicates a secondary, memory-type response that is elicited through re-stimulation of pre-existing immune cells. Primary immune responses to novel antigens take longer to evolve and initially produce IgM antibodies, which is then followed by the isotype switch to IgG and IgA.
A certain amount of IgM was indeed detected alongside IgG and IgA in some studies [1,4]. Importantly, however, IgG rose faster than IgM [4], which confirms that the early IgG response was indeed of the memory type. This memory response indicates pre-existing, cross-reactive immunity due to previous infection with ordinary respiratory human coronavirus strains. The delayed IgM response most likely represents a primary response to novel epitopes which are specific to SARS-CoV-2.
Memory-type responses have also been documented with respect to T-cell-mediated immunity [5–7]. Overall, these findings indicate that our immune system efficiently recognizes SARS-CoV-2 as “known” even on first contact. Severe cases of the disease thus cannot be ascribed to lacking immunity. Instead, severe cases might very well be caused or aggravated by pre-existing immunity through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE, see below).
Serum antibody profiles were reported for 203 individuals following SARS-CoV-2 infection [8]. 202 (>99%) of the participants exhibited SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. With 193 individuals (95%), these antibodies prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection in cell culture and also inhibited binding of the spike protein to the ACE2 receptor. Furthermore, CD8+ T-cell responses specific for SARS-CoV-2 were clear and quantifiable in 95 of 106 (90%) HLA-A2-positive individuals.
Significance. This study confirms the above assertion that the immune response to initial contact with SARS-CoV-2 is of the memory type. In addition, it shows that this reaction occurs with almost all individuals, and particularly also with those who experience no manifest clinical symptoms.
The goal of the vaccination is to stimulate production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, but we now know that such antibodies can and will be rapidly generated by everyone upon the slightest viral challenge, even without vaccination.
Severe lung infections always take many days to develop, which means that if the antibodies generated by the memory response are needed, they will arrive on time. Therefore, vaccination is unlikely to provide significant benefit with respect to the prevention of severe lung infection.
Discovery 4: Rapid increase of spike protein antibodies after the second injection of mRNA vaccines
IgG and IgA antibody titres were monitored before vaccination and after the first and the second injection of mRNA vaccines [3]. Antibody titres rose with some delay after the first injection, then plateaued, but rose again very shortly after the second injection.
Significance. Even though the antibody response to the first injection is of the memory type, the small time lag after the injection may mitigate adverse reactions, because the abundance of spike protein on the cells in the blood vessel walls and in other tissues may have already passed its peak when the antibodies arrive.
The situation changes dramatically with the second injection. Then the spikes are produced and protrude into the bloodstream that is already swarming with both reactive lymphocytes and antibodies. The antibodies will cause the complement system [9,10] and also neutrophil granulocytes to attack the spike protein-bearing cells. The possible consequences of all-out self-attack by the immune system are frightening.
Antibody-dependent enhancement of disease
As described, memory-type immune responses ensure the rapid rise of antibody titres after initial exposure to SARS-CoV-2, rendering the benefit of vaccine-induced antibody response exceedingly doubtful. Regardless, we should not assume that high antibody titres against SARS-CoV-2 will always improve the clinical outcome. With several virus families—in particular with Dengue virus, but also with coronaviruses—antibodies can aggravate rather than mitigate disease. This occurs because certain cells of the immune system take up antibody-tagged microbes and destroy them. If a virus particle to which antibodies have bound is taken up by such a cell, but it then manages to evade destruction, it may instead start to multiply within the cell. Overall, the antibody will then have enhanced the replication of the virus. Clinically, this antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) can cause a hyperinflammatory response (a “cytokine storm”) that will amplify the damage to the lungs, liver and other organs of our body.
Attempts to develop vaccines to the original SARS virus, which is closely related to SARS-CoV-2, repeatedly failed due to ADE. The vaccines did induce antibodies, but when the vaccinated animals were subsequently infected with the virus, they became more ill than the unvaccinated controls (see e.g. [11]). The possibility of ADE was not adequately addressed in the clinical trials on any of the COVID-19 vaccines. It is therefore prudent to avoid the danger of inducing ADE through vaccination and instead rely on proven forms of treatment [12] for dealing with clinically severe COVID-19 disease.
Conclusion
The collective findings discussed above clearly show that the benefits of vaccination are highly doubtful. In contrast, the harm the vaccines do is very well substantiated, with more than 15.000 vaccination-associated deaths now documented in the EU drug adverse events database (EudraVigilance), and over 7.000 more deaths within the UK and the US [13].
ALL PHYSICIANS MUST RECONSIDER THE ETHICAL ISSUES SURROUNDING COVID-19 VACCINATION.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Notes
1. Ogata, A.F. et al. (2021) Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. -:x-x
2. Amanat, F. et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces functionally diverse antibodies to NTD, RBD and S2. Cell -:x-x
3. Wisnewski, A.V. et al. (2021) Human IgG and IgA responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. PLoS One 16:e0249499
4. Qu, J. et al. (2020) Profile of Immunoglobulin G and IgM Antibodies Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin. Infect. Dis. 71:2255-2258
5. Le Bert, N. et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature 584:457-462
6. Grifoni, A. et al. (2020) Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 181:1489-1501.e15
7. Gallais, F. et al. (2021) Intrafamilial Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Cellular Immune Response without Seroconversion. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27:x-x
8. Nielsen, S.S. et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of disease severity. EBioMedicine 68:103410
9. Magro, C.M. et al. (2020) Docked severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 proteins within the cutaneous and subcutaneous microvasculature and their role in the pathogenesis of severe coronavirus disease 2019. Hum. Pathol. 106:106-116
10. Magro, C.M. et al. (2021) Severe COVID-19: A multifaceted viral vasculopathy syndrome. Annals of diagnostic pathology 50:151645
11. Tseng, C. et al. (2012) Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One 7:e35421
12. McCullough, P.A. et al. (2021) Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection. Am. J. Med. 134:16-22
13. Johnson, L. (2021) Official Vaccine Injury and Fatality Data: EU, UK and US.
George Webb seems to believe that the AMERICAN MILITARY was behind COVID-19.
I tend to think that CHINA and its AMERICAN ALLIES (DS, DNC, CIA) were behind it.
But I will bet we both agree on one thing.
WHOEVER KILLED THE MARRIED ARMY DOCTORS HAS SKIN IN THAT GAME.
The two arrested in the murders of Dr. Edward McDaniel and Dr. Brenda McDaniel identified as Ronnie Marshall, 20 and D’Angelo Strand, 19. The two were co-workers of one of the McDaniels’ relatives. @7NewsDCpic.twitter.com/Yc7eB8ryHr
Nothing about the Wuhan connection. THAT is what we are looking for. This alleged connection could be pure bullshit, but yet something stinks.
That article doesn’t really do anything other than to reinforce the connection between the murders and the attempted burglary at the same residence earlier in the week on the MONDAY – and that the police were certain these were connected. For all that’s worth, it’s sketchy as hell. Burglary?
The People Magazine article is linked to THIS local WTOP news report, which included this critical information about the “cover murder motive”:
Police said they believe the shooting Wednesday on the 8000 block of Flint Street near Redman Street was a “follow-up and related to the interactions Monday,” when police responded to a call for service and conducted an active burglary investigation.
Police Chief Kevin Davis said they know that at least one of the two men was at the home on Monday.
Davis said the motive is currently believed to be a dispute, and police are working to figure out what it was about.
Maj. Ed O’Carroll, bureau chief of Major Crimes Cyber and Forensics for Fairfax County police, said the investigation is ongoing.
“As of this moment, we have not located the firearm, but we have a lot of work to do. I mentioned the vehicle that’s now in our possession. We got a lot of things to follow up on. We want that firearm … This case does not close with these two arrests and these multiple charges. In some aspects, it’s just beginning,” O’Carroll said.
He’s asking anyone with information on what happened to call police at 703-246-7800
The McDaniels were both military doctors and colonels, and Edward McDaniel was still active with the Army.
OK – so we know that one of the killers was at the residence on Monday in connection to the “burglary”.
Now, here is MORE information about the “motive” via Axelrod-Alinsky media, NBC Washington (something like the commie media equivalent of the Washington Field Office). Note that the narrative motive actually gets recorded (very important to establish “facts”) – this is from other local coverage:
Officers were called to the home Monday about an altercation and potential burglary in progress, Davis said.
On a dispatch call to responding officers, a dispatcher can be heard saying the caller and her husband were upstairs with a shotgun in their home. “The subject” was in the basement.
“Caller is advising the subject is after her son and that he is with them upstairs,” the dispatcher said.
Two days later, the parents, not the son, were killed.
The deaths mark the ninth and 10th homicides in Fairfax County this year so far, in an increase from the count last year at this time.
A $10,000 reward for information is being offered in this case.
Stay with NBC Washington for more details on this developing story.
In my opinion, the parents were ALWAYS the MK target of the pliable “Seth Rich MS-13 type” “dull as a sawed nail” shooters. You Know Who is already off the charts on this one.
You will note at this point that everybody is pushing the “dispute” angle. More references (not cited here) included at the end of this post.
Running out of leads, I did some searches on the name of the deceased, the name of his hospital, and “Wuhan Games”. THAT got interesting. I found nothing direct, but I did find TWO very interesting leads, BOTH of which pointed to research by George Webb.
First, an article in Veterans Today, a very shady “John Kerry” type operation which is routinely sided with Russia and China, hiding behind the Vet Card.
This is basically supporting the Chinese counter-narrative to the earlier Wuhan Games theory that CCP spread the disease via the Wuhan games. The Chinese counter-theory, that the US started the virus at the Wuhan Games, launches off George Webb disinformation that COVID came from here. Well, yeah, it did, but that’s a little more complicated than China’s “malign blame-shifting conspiracy theory”.
George Webb is cited several times, including multiple tweets, but now that his old account on Twitter was REMOVED and then taken over by an anti-Webb Democrat troll, there is no official record to be found. However, the TEXT of the tweets remains in this article, and it’s useful to look at them. E.g.:
Patient Zero from Wuhan, Maatje Benassi, is a Dutch American woman cyclist. Her husband is also a cyclist in the US Atmed Forces (SPAWAR) and believe you be in Wahan in October of 2019. Benny Benassi is Patrient Zero in Holland, and has already made a rap video about Coronavirus pic.twitter.com/u1Z5VuYCaG— TruthLeaks – Investigative Journalist George Webb (@GeorgWebb) March 22, 2020
Webb’s basic theory is that the virus was spread from Fort Detrick to China via a US military cyclist in the games, who has State Department (i.e., CIA) connections. This is where it all gets really messy, not the least of which reasons being that I suspect that at this point, Webb was being fed disinformation.
That woman cyclist is Dutch and an Italian citizen, yet is somehow in the US Army as an intelligence operative. WTF. She comes back from Wuhan and gives COVID to her relative in the Netherlands. That Webb tweet link still works, although the Instagram link to proof that her relative got the disease does not.
Because this woman was a cyclist, the cycling world took note of this theory, particularly once CHINA started using it to enlarge THEIR theory that the US spread the disease at the Wuhan games.
Here is the link to some excellent coverage of that whole angle by a cycling site:
— The Grinch That Tried To Warn You (@ShoreProgress) May 28, 2021
So Max Wells appears to have made that connection. Here are his tweets:
US Army participates in the Wuhan military games were medically cleared to go to China at Fort Belvoir in Fairfax-Virginia—medical clearances signed by US Army Colonel Edward McDaniel Jr, M.D.—but beyond shockingly yesterday, saw Colonel-Doctor McDaniel and his US Army physician
Let me stop here quickly and save all this stuff for when Twitter takes it down.
Bear in mind that requests for sources from these guys in the replies are not getting answers. Yeah, I get that, too, but just sayin’.
Now – go back to the timeline of “Grinch the Uncancelable” and some awesome stuff from Webb pops up.
If the murdered Colonel McDaniels really did administer the nanoferritin vaccine to the US soldiers going to the Wuhan Military Games, this will be the most bittersweet day of my life. Bittersweet because Task Force is not here to see her validation. pic.twitter.com/1LeLE3Me5L
— George Webb – Investigative Journalist (@RealGeorgeWebb1) May 28, 2021
This might be worth saving:
And yeah, I’ve talked about the Army’s ferritin-based vaccine, which should avoid some of the problems of the full spike protein, by only using PART of the spike protein attached to ferritin – in many ways like the Novavax technology. Yet I am really thinking this Magnet Challenge stuff is a high-quality disinformation meme.
But might the Army have decided to protect its people being sent to Wuhan, if they had intel that the ChiComs were going to infect their people? Sure might be smart to vaccinate them.
Kulacz nailed it about Bavari. I built the story and drilled down to the courier level. There will be Pulitzers for all. Now is not the time to worry about credit. pic.twitter.com/utmvN6YQ5N
— George Webb – Investigative Journalist (@RealGeorgeWebb1) May 28, 2021
At this point, I think we are in a vortex of both information and disinformation. But something interesting is going on.
I encourage everybody to research this topic, bearing in mind that there is much trickery abounding.
Wuhan Lab and Ft Belvoir trying to blame each other for the success of their joint project.
This is a very important video you don’t want to miss. It just came out, and the doctor is a guy I’ve been following. He chooses his words carefully, to stay inside the establishment where he can publish some of the top papers, but he speaks the truth at all times.
Don’t let the video title fool you – the doc is much more “reserved” than big scary death headlines, but that is EXACTLY WHAT HE TALKS ABOUT.
Another post discussed how – for whatever reasons are quietly embedded upon the length of the full spike protein and fragments thereof, chimeric or not – we are also now cursed with what appears to be, to some [currently socially tolerable] extent, an abortion virus and abortion vaccines.
Trust me – THAT is a trumpet that BRINGS DOWN WALLS.
We may even have a scientifically sound explanation for the craziest reports of vaccine side effects in the close but unvaccinated – namely, hormonal activities that are operating at the low microgram level.
Oxytocin – abortion dose = 10-30 IU = 16-50 mcg
Let me explain how that works. Think “DUST”.
I can tell you all about the potency of carfentanil. ONE BREATH of inhaled dust containing a tiny amount of it knocked me out like a roundhouse to the left jaw. If that ENTIRE DUST had been carfentanil, I would have been DEAD. But there was a fraction – a tiny fraction – of that tiny grain you see right there, that got into my lungs, riding on OTHER DUST, and I was OUT LIKE A LIGHT.
NOW you understand the POWER of the spike protein.
Yes, there is SO MUCH that they HIDE FROM US to maintain POWER OVER US.
However, now I want to put ALL of this virology technology into DEEP PERSPECTIVE.
“Black goo” biological agent in the movie Prometheus, part of the “Alien” franchise.
What I am going to tell you is almost certain to shock you – both about the disease and about the vaccine. It shocked me. That’s why I figured I had to explain this to people.
And what’s even WEIRDER – this is not totally about the disease or the vaccines, but also about their CONTEXT, which forces you to SEE them both differently and more CLEARLY.
A while back, I was just browsing the “edutainment” about viruses on the internet, when I was led down an interesting rabbit hole of viruses in entomology. You know – INSECTS. I read something on Wikipedia which bothered me, so I set it aside. It all seemed FAR too familiar. It surely impacted all this crap we’re going through now – I just wasn’t sure how. Later I came back and read it again.
Now, I understand. It’s actually rather beautiful. But – well – it’s interesting.
The greatest point being – THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN.
The great irony of the idea “nothing new under the sun” is the self-referential part – the idea that EVEN this little bit of wisdom is with certainty not even attributable to its first alleged “author”, who HIMSELF surely understood the great irony of his saying it, and that others might attribute it to him, someday.
Nothing new under the sun. This bit of Solomonian passed-on wisdom about the curation rather than creation of wisdom is far truer than I realized. Let’s EXPAND just a bit.
The idea that this universe is as old as it appears to be, and that in all that time, Einstein was the first person (using the term rather broadly) to discover the logic of how speed actually works, strikes me as a violation of Solomon’s logic about “first discovery” being rare as hen’s teeth.
Likewise, Solomon’s logic goes further and tells me that “hen’s teeth” undoubtedly happened a lot more often than, when in its earthly rarity, it happened “here and almost now”, but seemingly only roughly once.
Rarity being somewhat relative, with distance providing a deceptive but effective cover for number and frequency, all of them together being a control of wisdom over knowledge.
Yet even these seeming corollaries of the idea of “nothing new under the sun” are just repeats of the idea with some frill on the edges enlightened for our benefit.
“…it is curiosity that gives meaning and savour to life.”
LIFE. Seems to be part of the design. No?
Have I BOTHERED you yet?
Maybe even a bit of trepidation – or even FEAR?
Good. THAT has happened before. “Nothing new under the sun.”
You can never go wrong with Solomon.
The Last Time Gene Therapy Was Reinvented
I keep trying to tell people – DNA is very smart. We are slowly learning how to talk to it. Sometimes we actually listen. Sometimes we even plagiarize.
DNA bargains and wheedles its way into the future, changing in whatever ways it has to, to keep itself alive. It gains as much vision of the future and the past that it can, using proteins, to persist as well as it can.
Think of it this way. DNA fights and feuds with DNA, but who wins in the end?
DNA.
NOTHING that these foolish young humans are trying to do with their coronaviruses, their “vaccines”, and their “gene therapy” is new to DNA. DNA came up with ALL of this stuff – AGAIN – at least 100 million years ago. THAT was its destiny. Ironically repeating like its own form.
I am absolutely serious. The technology of EVERY one of our wonderful new coronavirus vaccines (or “injections” or “gene therapies”, if you prefer) was RE-invented by DNA approximately 70-100 million years ago on this planet, and is still around.
ONE example of a prior reinvention of gene therapy resides in a tiny biological war-game where THREE organisms cut a deal that keeps them all alive. I will point out all of the “original versions” to you, and you will see where human science basically plagiarized.
One of the three organisms is an insect – a kind of wasp – that gravitated into using a living host for reliable reproduction. The second is a voracious plant-predatory host insect – a caterpillar – that needs a dependent predator to keep its numbers in steady balance, because it won’t do it itself. The third is a virus that found a way to survive by helping insure that the host-guest “life transfer” process always succeeded, so that it, too, would survive.
DNA uses ALL OF THEM to optimally persist.
The key to understanding all of this, is a kind of virus called a “polydnavirus”. I personally like to pronounce that “Poe-LID-na-virus”, even though that is wrong. They’re actually supposed to be called “Polly-D-N-A-virus”. My advice is pick whatever you like – you’re probably never going to have to say the word publicly – and on the internet, your canine pronunciation is always perfect.
Or just call them PDVs.
Wikipedia’s entry for them is an excellent place to start.
The bottom line is very simple. The wasp lays its eggs INSIDE a caterpillar by injection. However, instead of injecting a mere venom along with the egg – a kind of chemical weapon – the wasp injects a venom containing a VIRUS – a biological weapon. The virus provides biological effects like immune suppression that HELP the wasp egg survive, hatch, and grow. This is much more efficient than merely injecting, say, immunosuppressive proteins in the venom. The immune suppression by the virus prevents immune response by caterpillar cells known as hemocytes.
All of that is shown in the following graphic.
Here is one of the first really fascinating aspects of these polydnaviruses. When they are in the wasp, they are actually PART of the wasp genome. That’s right. They’re IN THE WASP’S CHROMOSOMES. The virus is now PART of the wasp’s genetics. One could even view it as the wasp sending PART OF ITS OWN GENES into the host, to make sure that the egg survives.
When the virus is still inside the wasp, it only comes out of the genes and reproduces in one place, in FEMALE wasps, near where the eggs are formed. It doesn’t harm the wasp, because DNA is NOT stupid. Viral DNA learned – the hard way – don’t shoot the pilot. Just stay in your seat until it’s time to debark. Wasp DNA learned – the hard way – let the jihadists sleep until we get to the airport we want them to shoot up. All of it mediated through the most annoying code in the world, with zero comments and nearly inscrutable, almost accidental language.
You remember those “well, it works” phone calls, coders. “I don’t know. Try this.”
Now – the next point is even cooler – because it’s the exact same strategy as the coronavirus vaccines that use viral vectors (e.g., Johnson+Johnson, Oxford/AstraZeneca, Sputnik V).
The infection does not lead to replication of new viruses, rather it affects the caterpillar’s immune system, as the virion carries virulence genes instead of viral replication genes.[4] They can be considered a type of viral vectors.[5]
The virus particles that are sent into the caterpillar are NOT reproductive – they are merely infective. They don’t code for creation of new virus, which might reproduce exponentially and kill the host or use up too many resources. Instead, the infective non-reproductive virus particles – just like the coronavirus vaccines – give a nice, predictable amount of expression of new proteins, useful for the wasp eggs and larvae to prosper. The virus basically CONSERVES caterpillar so that it has a ticket and a ride OUT of the dead caterpillar when it’s all over.
That’s the EXACT same strategy as our mRNA and DNA vaccines. Don’t crank out too much spike protein, by cranking out any new virus, and thereby kill the host. The main point is SAVING the host. The point may also be STERILIZING the host, to some extent, because THAT protein effect is beneficial to the injecting parasites known as the Democrat Party, globalist banks, and China. And probably more than one type of pencilneck. But they do want us to live – at least for some time, it would appear.
But seriously – the wasp polydnavirus immunosuppression strategy IS the human adenovirus vaccination strategy.
The only difference is what the proteins that are created DO. In the caterpillar, they suppress the immune system response to the egg or larva. In humans, the one protein stimulates antibodies to itself, and possibly does other things which are intended or not.
So you may be wondering how the virus gets from parent wasp to child wasp if the virus that is sent into the caterpillar host is not reproductive. AHA. It is because the virus is tucked into the GENOME of the baby wasp, safe and sound, for a ride into the future. The virus genome is essentially protected by the wasp.
Thus, you can see how genetic incorporation of the VIRUS benefits BOTH the wasp and the virus – and even – in a weird way – the caterpillar. The wasp gets to control the genetics and expression of the virus, so that they don’t cause the wasp too much trouble, but instead yield maximum benefit. The virus can then be more effective at its now exclusively delegated task of immune suppression in the caterpillar, by relinquishing reproduction to the wasp. Division of labor creates a great mutual dependency, but it also creates a strong contract.
One could say that genetic incorporation is a STRONGER CONTRACT between the virus and the wasp.
Just like genetic incorporation of COVID-19 spike protein could be a STRONGER CONTRACT of reduced human fertility.
But how does the caterpillar benefit?
The caterpillar is not going to live on as THAT particular caterpillar, but THAT particular baby caterpillar-culling wasp will live on in an assured 1:1 trade-off, and the REST of the caterpillars which benefit by the current culling will also live on as a stable population. The C-W-V balance is maintained BETTER by seeking a more stable chaotic resonance, without the wild swings of boom and bust, if wasp reproduction and population can be more closely tied to the caterpillar population, and they all live into the future without wild swings in numbers.
Another way to view it from the caterpillar perspective, is that viral efficiency minimizes the number of sacrificial caterpillars needed to keep the necessary number of wasps alive.
Now – we’ve seen viral vector vaccines analogous to the non-reproductive but infective polydnavirus virus particles – those would be the Johnson-+Johnson, AstraZeneca, and Sputnik V vaccines, which use adenoviral vectors for non-reproducing, protein-creating, virus DNA. But what about the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines?
Well, it turns out that these {{{wasps + viruses}}} invented ANOTHER way to get DNA or RNA into the caterpillar host – those are called VLP, for “virus-like particles”. There is a lot of range and variability here, just as there is in non-viral-vector vaccine technology. So in the same way that the Pfizer, Moderna and Inovio vaccines use proprietary “virus-like lipid droplet nanotechnology” to get their mRNA or DNA into human cells and thus cranking out spike protein, wasp/virus DNA can also use a strategy of “virus-like particles” that don’t even mimic non-working viruses, and STILL get their effective DNA transferred to the caterpillar, to effect the desired expression of needed wasp/virus proteins in the caterpillar.
Now – that is not to say that PDV (polydnaviruses) and VLP (virus-like particles) are the only tricks up the ovipositors of these parasitic wasps. It turns out that – in addition to these well-described DNA viruses, there are also apparently RNA viruses which ride along with wasp eggs during injection. So YES – both DNA and RNA “vaccines” are part of the wasp injections. And YES – there can be genetic incorporation in the caterpillar cells – for their short lifespan – just as there is already genetic incorporation, long-term, in the wasps.
Remember – who wins? DNA WINS. The HOUSE always wins.
But don’t forget Novavax! It may just be protein, but protein shills for DNA!
Not only are the Novavax “pseudo-viral protein-based nanoparticles” already examples of virus-like particles – they are matched by protein-based components of the wasp venom, both free-floating or otherwise. Indeed, one cannot read about the virus-like spiked particles in this wasp venom and not think that Novavax design is pretty much the same thing.
NOW – this is all a LOT to unpack. Not just that, but my “dumbing it down” probably made it just plain dumber. To correct that, I’m going to let the experts FIX THINGS UP.
The field of polydnaviruses in insects is NOT a huge field. It’s actually rather obscure, despite the phenomenal importance we are witnessing now. Just as the media can help those in power hype and control a field like climate science, or literally HIDE certain other fields like [[[ COUGH ]]], they can obscure still other fields which radically affect you, by hiding them pretty much in plain sight.
There is a BOOK that reviews the field, however, which is EXTREMELY helpful.
You can download parts of this book, and that includes TWO parts which are more than enough for a reasonably smart normal person to see the CONTEXT EXPLAINED.
Let me get ONE of those parts out of the way because you’re not going to be interested in this, unless you’re ready to get VERY nerdy on the history of science. But I am including it because it is AMAZING STUFF. You might view this as “The history of the science of the rediscovery of all the evolutionarily discovered technology used in the “vaccines” or “shots” or “gene therapy” of the coronavirus genetic injections”. It’s a beautiful window into HOW SCIENCE WORKS.
You can download a PDF of this at the linked page.
Now – if you read that – you will get a LOT, including a window into the slow and painful nature of research, but it’s a bit difficult to extract the good stuff if you’re not used to reading scientific review literature.
In contrast, the PREFACE of the book is MUCH easier to read, and it puts ALL this stuff in context that normal humans who are not experts in polydnaviruses can understand.
I highly encourage you to read the full preface at the linked page. But what I’m going to do here is simply pull out all kinds of juicy quotes – which is damn near the whole thing. [ My comments ] and identified WOW sequences will be in bold.
Here we go – this is all quoting:
Among parasitoid viruses, the fascinating models of polydnaviruses (PDVs) were discovered in the 1970s and the new field of polydnavirology was thus opened.
This field has been moving very fast since the beginning of the century thanks to the use of genomic approaches and rapid expansion of accessible databases on insect and viral gene sequences.
Parasitoid and viral genomic studies have confirmed that PDVs are functionally gene transfer agents used by parasitoid wasps to manipulate the physiology of their parasitized lepidopteran hosts by introducing modified versions of their own genes into host cells.
In the case of PDVs from braconid wasps, this kind of gene therapy (detrimental for the patient, which is in this case the lepidopteran host!) originated from the integration of a virus genome in a wasp genome ca. 100 million years ago. [LOL – I just noticed this “being impressed by the date” part – looks like we BOTH realized this independently. -Wolf]
This virus has been modified to incorporate wasp genes instead of its own viral genome in the nucleocapsids inside the viral particles. [Minor beef here – ownership and original genetic penmanship on the payload could be more “virus” and less “wasp” – interesting problem.]
Such use of viruses as vectors has been selected several times independently during the evolution of parasitoid wasps. [There it is. VIRAL VECTORS. Invented by DNA.]
The PDVs associated with braconid and ichneumonid wasps (Campopleginae subfamily) are unrelated as judged from the machinery producing the particles, and they represent an example of convergent evolution with different viral origins.
A third association event is suspected to have occurred in the Banchinae subfamily of ichneumonid wasps. In essence, the parasitoids have ‘captured’ viral elements that have evolved a host regulatory role that benefits the parasitoid to facilitate successful parasitism. [This is more “archaeopteryx” on the payload being of viral origin.]
Other associations with viruses or virus-like particles might have evolved with different organisms but they have not been unraveled yet, and parasitic amoebae that have associations with mammalian viruses are just one example. [“Lots of room at the bottom.”]
Many insects have evolved associations with a large number of species of bacteria such as Wolbachia and associations with viruses have been less well studied to date compared to bacterial symbionts.
A number of different viruses are found in the genital tract of the parasitoid wasps and conceivably they could be transferred to female wasps by behavioral traits, such as host feeding, initiated following ovipositor puncture of the surface of the integument.
Host feeding may thus be an advantageous behavior for viruses which facilitates their spread within insect populations and this intimate association with viruses might have favored interactions leading in some cases to integration of viral sequences into the wasp genome, although most of the wasps described in this book are no longer host feeders.
These viruses include RNA viruses of insect parasitoids and most of them appear nonpathogenic. Could these likewise have evolved a symbiotic relationship with their host? Future research may reveal such an intimate relationship with the wasp host carrying them but, currently, we have little information about their functional role as symbionts or pathogens in the virus–wasp–insect host relationship. [This was in 2012 – the situation could be different now.]
While the study of polydnaviruses was initially inspired by the pioneering studies of George Salt and Susan Rotheram at Cambridge University, more recent studies of Venturia (formerly Nemeritis) canescens particles (the virus-like agent studied by George Salt) by Otto Schmidt and Sassan Asgari documented that these virus-like virions lack both DNA and RNA; the particles are comprised of proteins encoded by parasitoid genes. [This is basically virus-like particle nanotechnology akin to the Novavax vaccine.]
The multiplicity of different molecular forms seen in these viruses and virus-like particles is truly amazing but, compared to polydnaviruses, we have less information about the biology of virus-like particles and how they function. [There is clearly an infinitude of possibility here – clearly WHY the push for gene therapy.]
Finally, not all parasitoid species are associated with viruses and most in this category have to rely on virulence factors produced by their ovaries and venom glands instead of using the host to produce them like for PDV-encoded gene products. [Translation – most of the wasps use plain old venom.]
PDV-associated species also produce venom that was shown in some cases to synergize the effect of the virus. [Combination biological and chemical weaponry.]
New sequencing approaches are more comprehensive and will thus allow comparisons of the arsenal of proteins used in different species, which will enhance our understanding of the dynamics of evolution of parasitoid virulence strategies. [Big data will allow spying on the past to happen even faster.]
Ectoparasitic wasps have not been examined yet for the presence of viral symbionts, and appear to have exploited venoms as a source of host regulatory molecules instead. Comparative studies on paralyzing versus nonparalytic venoms are lacking, and screening ectoparasitic species for viral elements should also be a future research priority. [Translation: there’s more to learn from regular stinging / paralyzing wasps.]
In addition to enhancing our knowledge of parasitoid strategies and increasing our understanding of the importance of symbiotic relationships in species evolution, parasitoid viruses and venoms may constitute a source of new molecules to control insect pests. This might be a revolutionary outcome of research on PDVs and other parasitoid viruses, since the safety of many chemical pesticides with respect to their detrimental impacts on human health and key species in the environment such as bees and other beneficial insects, is questioned. [You think proteins are going to be safer? HA! Get ready for new problems.] We anticipate that harvesting biopesticidal molecules from parasitoid venoms will likewise prove fruitful. [Translation: All this human wasp techno coronavirus lying crap is headed to agriculture, and presumably already there. Yeah.]
Finally, we hope that this book will satisfy the reader by presenting an overview of the most recent findings on all these topics presented by an international assemblage of authors. [You can say that again!]
In addition, we aim to inspire many future researchers to choose polydnavirology or studies of other parasitoid viruses or viral-like elements and venoms as their focus field. [You’ve inspired me, even though it’s a bit late for me to enroll in one more Marxist university.]
That’s it.
I tell you – this whole thing was a revelation. Suddenly, everything these people in Big Pharma have been doing has been HUMBLED BY GOD, using BUGS. LOL! Pretty amazing.
And being humbled, all of us, the TRUTH now becomes clear.
Now – if all this seems a bit scary, but you’re thinking “Hey, this isn’t exactly like our case, in which Democrats mind-fracked their victims with an RNA virus” – well, HOLD YOUR BEERS. With God – IRONICALLY – all things are possible.
Yes, this, too – baffling the victim with an RNA virus – was borrowed from nature, although I am being just a wee bit facetious, since it was done much more intelligently and much more socially against a more intelligent and social species.
The Case of the Shanghaied Babysitter
Yeah, I’ll try to keep this one shorter, but I don’t really have to go back TOO MUCH to the original literature here.
Here is where I FOUND this case originally. An article that was COPIED onto a forum.
This is actually a very long and complete scientific article. Let me give you the “TL;DR” version.
When the wasp lays an egg in the ladybug, it also injects an RNA virus. That virus makes the ladybug go “mask Karen” crazy, and stick around and GUARD the pupated larval wasp after it emerges from the ladybug and cocoons. The ladybug may then even kick the virus and go on living after the young wasp departs.
Yeah, let me HIGH FIVE that long-hauler ladybug.
Just sayin’.
Democrats.
SPIT.
SO – where are we now?
Is Phony Gene Therapy About Population Control?
We have now looked at the COVER PRESENT (coronavirus and vaccines), the EFFECTIVE PRESENT (spike protein virus and vaccines), the LIKELY DEEPER MOTIVATING PRESENT (contraceptive / abortive virus and “vaccines” that look pretty much like public “health” gene therapy), and the PURPOSED ORIGINAL HONEST PAST (infection and/or genetic modification of the injected to produce desired effects using RNA viruses and/or specialized viral vectors) – the latter insect past being a lot like what is happening now.
Are you ready for the FUTURE?
Well, there’s a lot of range on that. Maybe it’s THIS…..
Now I know a lot of y’all are, like me, saying “Yeah, that will be a cold day in hell!” But let’s consider it anyway. It helps to understand things.
WHY would Hillary say this, about Trump’s possible winning in 2016?
What crime could POSSIBLY send hundreds of historic conspirators to some horrible fate like what happened to the NAZIS? They would have had to have done something even more horrible – right?
Well, viewed in “holocaust” (small “h”) terms, an “abortion virus” followed by “abortion vaccines” might count.
It’s a pretty ingenious idea. If you honestly believe that overpopulation threatens the planet, and that stopping it “by any means necessary” is justified, then the idea of:
taking a modifiable cold virus but…..
don’t call it that, so people will be AFRAID
warm up the FEAR CROWD with SARS, Ebola, Zika, etc.
use a cold with its own moderate antiprogestogenic or oxytocin hormonal activity, or some other way of exerting a contraceptive or abortive activity
optionally increase that activity
release the virus
create vaccines with the same effect
require ongoing vaccines to titrate the effect on society
To me, this is very much like the wasp strategy, only instead of hijacking the juvenile butterfly with immunosuppressive negative gene therapy in a PRO-FERTILITY strategy for its own offspring, what the Democrats are doing is an ANTI-FERTILITY strategy using progestosuppressive negative gene therapy on basically all humans who are not in on the scam. And they also used an RNA virus to mess with our minds, though THAT was a bit artful, shall we say.
Now, I think the success or failure of their operation is going to depend on the ultimate level of contraception that is achieved here. The effect on society will depend on whether the Dems, globalists, and Chinese are trying to pull off a very steep and fast population drop that would generate a social immune reaction, or a long, slow, incremental one that would not. We probably won’t know this for several years.
But just consider this “back of the envelope” calculation.
Let’s say that Demmunists require 2 coronavirus boosters every year. Say that between compliance and effectiveness, ONE of those boosters is effectively pregnancy-blocking for any pregnancy currently in process. Run this over all of humanity, so that once every year, every woman is hit with a “menstruation and miscarriage vaccine” using the spike protein. With a pregnancy window of 75% of the year, that target is the broad side of a barn, as long as CDC continues to insist that it’s safe for pregnant women, or women who are trying to become pregnant. You would get massive observable menstruation and miscarriages after vaccination, and the plot would not last.
It’s not a SUSTAINABLE LIE.
BUT – as long as the effect is random, subtle, and single-digits, it can be hidden by a compliant scientific community, which is socially conditioned to reject the truth. Even bigger, control of social media, communications, and other avenues of discovering the truth, mean society can be kept completely blind to a subtle population control.
But seriously – reducing the fertility of humans by 5% is a BIG DEAL. It doesn’t mean it’s the end of it. It’s a GOOD BEGINNING – from their point of view.
You’ve got to look at this thing, like you’re trying to pull it off, to see that you really COULD pull it off.
And if we could pull it off, they will pull it off.
So – that’s where I’m at.
And if I’m right, they will NEVER FACE JUSTICE for what they’re doing.
So here is a rule about Democrats.
Democrats, China and other communists will always pick an unjust fait accompli over a just agreement.
Thus, as long as they do things where the price of tolerating their crimes is less than the cost of a civil war, they will just keep doing those things.
The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that degrades animal tissues, and is responsible for the very distinctive giant-pock-mark-wound-forming symptoms of recluse bites. The brown recluse does not have as much of this protein in its venom as do some other recluses. The worst recluse, distributed over several countries in South America, has roughly ten times as much sphingomyelinase D as the North American brown recluse. Bites by THAT recluse not only result in deep wounds – they result in SYSTEMIC effects much more often than do bites of the “mere” brown recluse. Fatalities are much more common.
But just stop and think – THAT is how potent protein venoms can be. The tiny bite of a spider with a tiny bit of a protein in it – mere micrograms – can leave a 10-inch hole in the leg, with life-threatening systemic effects.
Snake venoms use different proteins from spiders in their venoms. Some spiders like the black widow have neurotoxic venoms, which affect nervous function, and some snakes like cobras have DIFFERENT neurotoxic venoms.
The honey badger is, weirdly, somewhat immune to the paralyzing neurotoxic cobra venom (jump to near the end of the video).
Many snakes have hemotoxic venoms, and THOSE venoms tend to cause cardiovascular problems. Interestingly, one of those problems is a somewhat rare clotting disorder called thrombocytopenia.
Thus, when I heard that this uncommon symptom was sometimes occurring as a coronavirus vaccine adverse effect, I suspected that there might be a protein cause – the spike protein – acting similarly to proteins in those hemotoxic snake venoms.
If that were the case, we should expect the same effect to be caused by COVID-19 itself, sometimes.
Should we just jump on such an analogy? One that is based on the ASSUMPTION that the spike protein is causing thrombocytopenia? Or at least similarly involved in the two cases?
Let’s think about this.
One of the things which is most fascinating about the BRANCH COVIDIANS – including the high clergy in government and media – is just how STRONGLY they tend to discourage alternative perspectives on COVID-19 – doing so in a way which is alarming even by the normal standards of narrative-setting and enforcement.
For example, at the very beginning, social media gatekeepers were needlessly hostile to Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell’s “high-altitude sickness” perspective on COVID-19 hypoxia, despite the fact that this led to a very beneficial new policy on keeping patients OFF vents, probably saving millions of lives, as well as giving us all a better understanding of HOW COVID-19 is and (more importantly) is NOT damaging lungs of patients.
Millions of lives. Think about it. Not a bad save – unless you want a guy named Trump GONE by any means necessary.
Now, some of these “different” perspectives can and do lead to non-working or just plain wrong theories at a micro-level, but so can ANY perspective. Dr. Kyle-Sidell’s ideas led to a variety of hemoglobin-related and malaria-related theories of COVID-19 which were neither fundamentally true nor useful, and which theories died on their own, without any need for censorship, but which were part of a questioning movement which also led to increased recognition of the endothelial nature of the coronavirus attack on patients’ lungs and other organs.
A CHANGE in perspective which WAS and IS fruitful.
Whether we are talking about damage to capillaries in the lungs, vein occlusions in the retina, or organ damage, particularly in the heart or kidneys, it appears that the cardiovascular endothelium is where COVID-19 does the most damage.
Comorbidities which already involve damage or potential damage to blood vessels – particularly diabetes and endocrine or cardiovascular diseases – are thus particularly dangerous, as SARS-CoV-2 and (presumably) its spike protein – which is what attacks cells – would be attacking an already weak point of failure.
I want to thank GrandmaInTexas for those two most recent examples of COVID vaccinations precipitating fatal outcomes in people with both diagnosed and undiagnosed comorbidities. For the record, Dan Kaminsky’s vaccine was undoubtedly either Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson+Johnson, while Actor Vivekh’s vaccine was Covaxin. The former 3 are all genetic vaccines – the latter is inactivated whole virus. All of them use the WHOLE spike protein in some form or another to trigger immunity.
Here is a handy principle which I call “spike protein equivalence”, as a special case of “vaccine immunological equivalence”.
If some affliction, condition, or mere FACTOR happens to be BAD for a potential victim of COVID-19 itself, then it’s also going to be bad for recipients of the vaccine. The difference is only that – most likely – in MOST cases – the vaccine constitutes a far lighter assault on the patient, than the disease itself.
THAT is the basic logic of vaccination. REDUCE THE RISK. But nonetheless, ACCEPT A RISK.
Do not kid yourself. The WHOLE POINT of vaccines is to entertain a lesser risk – a risk that is not as bad as the disease. The only question is “how less bad” does any particular vaccine happen to be. Based upon that information, one has INFORMED CONSENT.
People need to understand risks clearly in order to take those risks smartly.
Or NOT take them. Where the lyric“If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice” operates against the circling helicopters of COVID-19 and any successor viruses.
When we do not honestly face the risks and benefits of vaccines, we end up with the psychotic disconnect we now see, where people who SHOULD be voices of reason and trust – like the CDC – are LYING and losing half or more of the nation as trusting followers.
Rather than re-hash here how the CDC has lied to us already, or why the handy principles of “spike protein equivalence” and “snake protein analogy” work so well in understanding COVID disease and vaccine risks, let me give you links to my most recent discussions of the relevant thought.
The FIRST ONE is probably the most comprehensive, and helps to understand the rest.
PREFACE I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT. The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – …
Alternate Title: Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective? Gloating Pre-Preface There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought. Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY …
Every coronavirus vaccine so far has shown us SOME defect upon mass release, which was NOT evident in EVEN phase III clinical trials. Look HERE for a searchable PDF document of adverse effects from the Pfizer vaccine: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/977005/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf Check out these videos on the low-platelet clotting problem from the Oxford/Astrazeneca vaccine. Here is a fantastic …
I saw an excellent explanation of the clotting problem with the AstraZeneca vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 here: The doctor, Dr. ZDogg, MD, offers an exceptionally clear explanation of both what is going on with the AstraZeneca vaccine, and why its distribution was halted or limited in some places for some age groups of patients. …
I am not the only person who is seeing that the SPIKE PROTEIN and variants are interesting beasts. Cthulhu tipped me off to THESE TWO GEMS by Karl Denninger, which are extraordinarily worthwhile:
Even though these deal primarily with spike protein equivalence rather than the snake protein analogy, the latter of which Cthulhu mentioned in his tip (he knew I would like these), there is some even more shocking perspective in the second link, in which Denninger simply asks – why did we use the WHOLE sequence of the spike protein which we received from China?
Beyond simple blame games, in which I could postulate that “whole spike protein vaccines” may have resulted from dumb psychology, or even malicious treachery by one or more parties, I can ALSO place Denninger’s question in the context of both failing to ask “Stoecker questions” about “should we base vaccines on the WHOLE spike protein?”, AND the idea that – intentionally or unintentionally – by whoever – we essentially fell into China’s version of the plot of Species…..
OR – if we don’t want to be all negative about things, try the Earth-saving genetic sequence reconstruction sub-plot of The Fifth Element, with a few more plot devices about process-skipping on the internal growth code, also a bit of a lesson.
Is such “gain of function” good or bad? One could view horsepox-based smallpox vaccine adoption as “gain of function” – a low-level example of the intelligent acceleration of evolution as a “natural” part of evolution itself.
As an aside, IMO the reason they use women for these scenes is ultimately the same reason the spike protein seems to target women’s physiology more than men’s, and that men are actually the first utilitarian sex robots, but – well – it’s so simple, it’s complicated. Patriarchy is both overrated and overstated, shall we just say.
ANYWAY, back to snakebite. “Cleopatra meets spike protein” – only worse.
VAERS reports a breastfeeding five-month old infant has died of TTP – a rare clotting disorder linked to, yes, low platelets. He became ill one day after his mother received her second @pfizer shot.
I actually saved that whole report, which is not easily linked, as a series of images:
Before I go on, let me just say that immunology strikes me as a lot like quantum mechanics. If anybody says they truly understand it, it’s almost a sign that they don’t. Nevertheless, basic suspicions work like crazy in either field, which is, again, interesting. In either field, it doesn’t take a genius to see that – 99% of the time – a snake in the grass IS a snake in the grass.
Already, the entire Snopesian Empire is fired up over this case.
SEEK anything related, and you will FIND – both WHEAT and CHAFF.
READ, and you will FIND – both INTERESTING and HOLLOW.
No matter how many guns they get working and belt-fed, cross-firing with their diversionary strawman arguments on this one case, the fact of the matter is that TTP is intimately linked to immune disorders, immune responses, and vaccination, so if it shows up, vaccines are and will remain the likeliest suspect NO MATTER WHAT. All Fauci’s horses and all Pfizer’s men are not going to get rid of the NOTABLY MANY cases of TTP , other thrombocytopenic clotting disorders, and clotting disorders in general, which are showing up in (1) COVID cases, (2) COVID recoverees, (3) vaccination adverse events, and (4) vaccination of recoverees in particular.
The relationship of TTP to vaccines and “malappropriate antibodies” in particular is UNDERSTOOD SCIENCE. This is not going away, despite the near-dogmatic narrative that “COVID vaccines do no harm” at the public level, reinforced by the narrative that “fighting vaccine hesitancy is worth LYING about adverse effects”.
No, it’s not.
Skip the following scientific review unless you feel nerdy. I recommend just skimming in either case. But I promise – the deeper you dig here, the more WHEAT you will find.
TTP as a function of age of onset and mechanism for ADAMTS13 deficiency. The proportions of adulthood-/childhood-onset TTP and acquired/inherited TTP, respectively, presented in this figure were calculated from the data of the French Registry for TTP (840 patients).10,13 These data are in agreement with miscellaneous demographic data reported in the literature by other teams.3,5-9 The diagram shows 100 patients with TTP, each patient being represented by a symbol, either a square for patients with adulthood-onset TTP (91%) or a circle for patients with childhood-onset TTP (9%). Acquired TTP is presented in blue (94.5%), and inherited TTP (USS) in red (5.5%). Interestingly, the proportion of USS is very low (2.5%) in adulthood-onset TTP, whereas it is as high as 33% in childhood-onset USS.
Abstract
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare and life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, severe thrombocytopenia, and organ ischemia linked to disseminated microvascular platelet rich-thrombi. TTP is specifically related to a severe deficiency in ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 repeats, member 13), the specific von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease. ADAMTS13 deficiency is most frequently acquired via ADAMTS13 autoantibodies, but rarely, it is inherited via mutations of the ADAMTS13 gene. The first acute episode of TTP usually occurs during adulthood, with a predominant anti-ADAMTS13 autoimmune etiology. In rare cases, however, TTP begins as soon as childhood, with frequent inherited forms. TTP is ∼2-fold more frequent in women, and its outcome is characterized by a relapsing tendency. Rapid recognition of TTP is crucial to initiate appropriate treatment. The first-line therapy for acute TTP is based on daily therapeutic plasma exchange supplying deficient ADAMTS13, with or without steroids. Additional immune modulators targeting ADAMTS13 autoantibodies are mainly based on steroids and the humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. In refractory or unresponsive TTP, more intensive therapies including twice-daily plasma exchange; pulses of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, or cyclosporine A; or salvage splenectomy are considered. New drugs including N-acetylcysteine, bortezomib, recombinant ADAMTS13, and caplacizumab show promise in the management of TTP. Also, long-term follow-up of patients with TTP is crucial to identify the occurrence of other autoimmune diseases, to control relapses, and to evaluate psychophysical sequelae. Further development of both patients’ registries worldwide and innovative drugs is still needed to improve TTP management.
So what does TTP look like?
See those pictures? You may want to THINK TWICE about the coronavirus vaccine if you ALREADY have this risky potential outcome of either the disease or the vaccine. I have a link showing that TTP is a high risk in COVID recoverees who get any of the vaccines – I just can’t find it now.
We ARE seeing some public recognition of adverse effects now:
However, as is visible in this article, we are not seeing ANY contraindications to vaccination being admitted publicly. The advice tends to be “get vaccinated, and if you don’t die, but have bad symptoms, see your doctor.
“Sure, Dr. Stalin. Sure. Say – you don’t have any recommendations to PREVENT THIS from happening again to somebody else now, do you? Those would be called ‘contraindications’. Most drugs have them.”
However, I think some recognition is coming. And why is that? Well…..
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …
…..we discussed other disorders – affecting reproductive health, you might say – that MAY or MAY NOT be mediated through the SAME or DIFFERENT activities of the spike protein.
THAT is an interesting question, actually. How economic is spike protein activity? How MUCH strategic information is carried, and at what density? How efficient ARE proteins at carrying smaller-molecular strategies into “genetic warfare”? We may not have those answers yet – and certainly not in PUBLIC SCIENCE – for some time.
Still, I think these questions will eventually be asked and answered, because the menstrual/gestational and clotting effects of the vaccines are so startling, that people are going to ask questions and get answers, whether the “mainstream” (meaning government/corporate) media wants to ask them or not, or to see them answered.
In that regard, we will carry on, asking questions and getting answers, carrying the principle of SPIKE PROTEIN EQUIVALENCE with us, as a handy and useful physiological tool.
The idea of SNAKE PROTEIN ANALOGY will become less of a medical utility, and more of a METAPHOR.
There is a refreshing honesty and innocence in this guy’s work. But more than that, he just has a way of catching small details that everybody else misses, and making them beautifully prominent. His portraits of famous figures are quite wonderful in this way. He will completely drop many of the features of those people that I love and see prominently as part of my personal recognition algos, and yet childishly play up awesome things I never noticed.
And with that, let’s talk about Eve.
Our next installment is going to go BACK IN TIME, and show you something very startling about WHEN all this COVID vaccine technology was actually invented.
A lot earlier than anybody wants to admit publicly. Here is a hint.
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon
When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to one of the coronavirus vaccines, I never considered for a moment – AT THAT TIME – that it might have been an INTENDED outcome by anybody. It was only slowly, later, that such a possibility began to sink in.
We tend to view pregnancy as a somewhat “iffy” condition, and vaccination as one of the infinite “iffy” things which could derail it. We tend to view outcomes, other than the really obvious, as “acts of God” – if not at the level of the instance, then at the level of fortune – such as family genetics. “Something is wrong” – but it’s never anybody’s fault.
Well, what if one could change “fortune”?
I was NOT surprised that a virtue-signaling doctor might take a coronavirus vaccine while pregnant. I WAS surprised that there was NO medical advice contrary to pregnant women getting the vaccine – that pregnancy was NOT a contraindication. Pregnant women are a SMALL subset of the population, centered age-wise on the sweet spot of coronavirus survivability. Why take a chance?
Nope – not a whisper of it, even in the aftermath of the lady doctor’s misfortune. Indeed, only on the DARK CONSPIRACY WEB was there even a hint that maybe the good lady doctor should have done something other than happily getting the vaccine.
That was the state of things for me, until there were reports of clotting problems with AstraZeneca, affecting mostly women.
Then, there were the clotting problems of the Johnson+Johnson vaccine, AGAIN affecting almost exclusively women.
Singingsoul asked about the possibility of any relationship to “the pill”. That REALLY got me thinking about the seeming sex linkage to clotting. However, I made no connection back to miscarriages or stillbirths.
That connection did not happen for me, until there were reports of “menstruation upon vaccination”. THAT sure sounded like a “day after pill” to this longtime observer of Big Pharma. THAT would explain a miscarriage or a stillbirth AND the sudden induction of menstruation.
THE SPIKE PROTEIN. An abortifacient? Even if only a “five-percenter”?
It suddenly made me wonder.
I mean, if we were actually dealing with…..
RU-486 The Vaccine, that meant we were probably dealing with…..
No – not THAT structure – THIS one. Or THESE two. Both of them SWARMING with possibilities.
Now THAT is something. Something which could be PROVEN in a lab.
Probably not a lab that would get any modern funding, unless the author was KNOWN to submit scientific truth to globalist narrative, but still…. SOME “errant” lab might “accidentally” prove it to MY satisfaction. And that’s all the science *I* need to keep moving “forward”, past globalist control of science.
Interesting possibility. No?
You can bet your LIFE that the Democrats ARE afraid of any correlation here, and WILL distract like crazy from even the possibility of such a correlation being contemplated by the public.
And there is a LOT of circumstantial suspicion here.
It still remains unclear which hands moved which chess pieces where, in terms of release of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but HOWEVER things happened, it certainly appears that a virus, which VERY LIKELY negatively affects human reproduction and coincidentally “gets rid of Trump presidencies“, conveniently escaped a Chinese lab, in an event that helped – IN MANY WAYS – the principal advocates if not worshipers of free and easy human abortion: Democrats, globalists, and Chinese communists.
How amazing is THAT?
The party of abortion, the movement of abortion, and the nation of abortion, may have just gotten a “statistically effective but plausibly deniable abortion cold” which – if you don’t change the abortion protein too much – or more specifically in the wrong directions – gives one an abortion vaccine having the same wonderful properties of denied responsibility – plus the properties of continuous excuse and adjustable frequency of administration, only needing MORE of what the CDC is very good at providing.
LIES.
In my opinion, these three human control stakeholders are going to do EVERYTHING possible to not merely shut down any consideration of their possible treachery – they will desperately reframe Fake Science to turn such a pharmacological desideratum into either a null, or an irremovable side effect. That is, if they can’t make PERCEPTION of the entire problem simply go away.
BUT LET’S BACK UP.
My normal skepticism of every new assertion of female lunar pheromonal menstrual mystery is not because I don’t believe that some new, unexplained mense magic is POSSIBLE, but simply because the first step of science is to look for any obvious explanations of new magic using old theories.
However, one does not have to reach very deep into “old theory” to figure out that “I got a shot and my uterus dumped” is eminently explainable as a simple pharmacological effect. If more than one woman says this, it’s very UNLIKELY to be due to mass mommy hysteria, and much more likely that the inner scientist in a whole bunch of women just raised her hands in class.
And when it finally gets stated publicly by the “generally respected class radical”, watch out.
Repinning this warning from last night, when I was called a "conspiracy theorist"'for warning that COVID vaccines are causing blood clotting, stillbirths and bizarre menses in women. Today FDA halt J and J vaccine for blood clots. https://t.co/4JilJxxKZU
— Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. (@naomirwolf) April 13, 2021
Let’s do that as an IMAGE which Twitter can’t delete and hide.
Now I would be remiss if I didn’t point out that the J+J recall, connected to VIPIT and/or TTP, is not clearly pharmacologically DIRECTLY connected to the observed menstrual symptoms in women, which are (IMO) more properly described as antiprogestogenic or abortive in nature. Yes, dysfunctional clotting is an issue with women taking a more mildly antiprogestational regimen of hormonal control known as the pill – an important clue that Singingsoul put me onto very early. So YES – “blood issues” tag along with the hormonal aspects of menstruation and gestation for all kinds of good and obvious reasons in menstruating mammals.
So if things just stopped there – at a protein with apparently striking but somewhat randomly effective antiprogestogenic activity, it would be all I would need to wrap this 5%-er conspiracy up TIGHT. It would – IMO – demonstrate some kind of intent, by somebody, somewhere, to force humanity into a more contraceptive future. It’s an elegant checkmate move, IMO, due to the DISEASE which is almost certainly hard to eliminate.
Very nicely, there is nothing WEIRD, MAGICAL, or SPOOKY about a highly potent antiprogestogenic protein, released first as a virus, and then as a vaccine, by a technocratic, power-holding oligarchy, which believes fervently in the social, societal, and civilizational effects of that protein.
It’s kinda weird that such medical cunning got into a virus, with our level of public scientific ability, but I can come up with several excellent theories as to how that happened – with varying degrees of believability, depending upon which particular secrets you believe the Deep State holds.
The trouble is, we have OTHER alleged evidence that we are now being asked to believe – that “people close to people being vaccinated” – BUT NOT ACTUALLY VACCINATED – are somehow, sometimes, showing symptoms. Setting aside the possibility of at least partial disinformation, including intentional discreditation and obfuscation (very likely in any case), this stuff borders on mense magic.
However – HOLD MY BEER at the Friday night lab outing to the bar. I’ve got a theory (hic).
Some of this stuff is also explicable by other potential scientific aspects of a putative antiprogestogenic or otherwise abortive spike protein – things which may indeed be credible science.
In fact, the “more bizarre stuff” could help to explain the “less bizarre stuff”, because it argues for a contraceptive potency which is more likely to be found in a prostaglandin analog like misoprostol, or a peptide hormone (you know, a small protein) like oxytocin, than in an antiprogestogen like mifepristone or lilopristone.
This gets into how RU-486 is administered, and how it actually works. It turns out that RU-486 is in fact the “less important actor” of the day-after pill.
I repeat. I want you to understand. RU-486 was a kind of beautiful social and scientific DECOY, DISTRACTION, and MISDIRECTION.
The primary abortifacient drug in the “day-after pill” is not actually mifepristone, a.k.a. RU-486, but the co-drug misoprostol.
This would not be the first time that Democrats DISTRACTED and MISDIRECTED to the lesser of two scandals so that the more murderous one would get off. Thus – IMO – RU-486 took Cuomo-kissing levels of media heat precisely so that the abortion-meister misoprostol would SKATE like a nursing home scandal with thousands of dead people.
Dosing of misoprostol for abortion – with or without anything else – is typically below 1 mg as a single dose, absorbed through the oral mucosa. Note that route of entry. That is a HUGE potency. One milligram is hardly anything at all. The fact that 1 mg of ANY substance will cause an abortion is, quite frankly, startling news.
Addition of RU-486 (200 mg) to the regimen of misoprostol (800 μg = 0.8 mg) alone RAISES the success of abortion from about 88% to near total, so if the spike protein is primarily showing a prostaglandin / oxytocin activity, then the spike protein could have almost any level of antiprogestogenic activity and still be a wickedly good abortifacient / contraceptive.
And speaking of that OLDER alternative to misoprostol, namely oxytocin – well, THAT particular uterine-contracting, labor-inducing substance is a peptide, i.e. a protein fragment. Which certainly argues that the idea of a spike protein having oxytoxin-like activity isn’t complete science fiction.
Note that oxytocin is only 9 amino acids long. Easy to hide in a longer sequence. And possibly as a DIFFERENT small sequence, because of protein 3-D dynamics.
·Cys – Tyr – Ile – Gln – Asn – Cys – Pro – Leu – Gly – NH2
Alternatively…..
CYIQNCPLG-NH2
SO – let’s state this for the record. If the spike protein or some fragment thereof has some kind of oxytocin activity, then we pretty much have our bad guy. The potency of oxytocin is even greater than that of misoprostol. One international unit (IU) of oxytocin is the equivalent of 1.68 μg of pure peptide. That is less than two MICROGRAMS per unit. The dose for adult abortion is roughly 10 to 30 IU, which translates to 16.8 to 50.4 micrograms. A very small fraction of a single milligram.
This is – bluntly – more potent than LSD.
Thus, it is entirely possible that if the spike protein or fragments spat back out from genetic incorporation of its instructions, somehow have oxytoxin activity, then that protein / peptide could act as a kind of contraceptive / abortifacient.
Are you with me?
OK – armed with THAT knowledge, listen to the following amazing discussion. Don’t pay attention so much to their hyperbole about “biological warfare”, or charming innocent errors about [this is a logical paraphrase] “digital lipid nanotechnology” – the stuff that makes it possible to call these people “conspiracy theorists” despite what I think are fairly impressive backgrounds on some of them. Pay attention to factual observations and reports, and ask if they are plausible when dealing with an extremely potent hormonal substance, where the amount needed to obtain strong biological effects is not only capable of being produced by the human body – the amount of substance needed to achieve the effect in self or other is BARELY EVEN VISIBLE.
So what do you think? I’ll let you decide for yourselves.
I don’t believe in unexplainable magic – I believe in science. But SCIENCE can explain stuff that does almost seem magical. And I think it could very well explain what people are observing here.
Thus, I believe that we may indeed be seeing some kind of real antiprogestogenic, prostaglandin, and/or oxytocin effect from the spike protein or a subunit thereof.
A “contraceptive” effect, basically. And most likely small enough to escape obvious notice, but BIG enough that when everybody is forced to take the vaccine, even during pregnancy, it “does its thing” and gives the depopulationist socialists a 5% solution.
It may not appear always, or always strongly enough to show up in every person, but it only has to show up in a FRACTION of people getting the disease, or taking the vaccine, to significantly change the world.
Indeed, if the effect is TOO STRONG, one cannot “get away with it”. But if the “worshipers of sacred abortion” just nickel and dime us, they can get a GOOD START on depopulation.
This article is for members only
(@JackPosobiec) 
