“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
And we’re finally serving a NORMAL DRINK tonight. Even though it’s a SECOND ROUND.
STAY TUNED…..
While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.
and what time of year is it now???
Christmas Spirit
We continue our WAAAAAY too-long celebration of Christmas by noting that some of our neighbors STILL have their lights and decorations up.
We saw a nice red Christmas bow laying in somebody’s yard by their driveway.
We ourselves just got rid of our tree.
And TODAY is the 25th of the month. That’s VERY “Christmassy”.
So yeah. Given that there are a few daysweeks months AFTER Christmas where it’s STILL Christmas, that means we have a few more weeks left. Riiiiiiight?
Sure! So have some hot CHRISTMAS chocolate!
And now, the rules of the pub.
HOUSE RULES
God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.
Now, back to business.
AMEN!
Free the January Brothers!
Current Art On The Wall
We’re just gonna segue into the next item with our selection, if that’s OK.
This gets a bit “planetary”…..
Venus and Mercury Instructing CupidChristiaan Huygens, Saturn, and SomethingRaindrops on Titan
…..which was based off of an FDA alert (sketchy link)…..
…..which actually links back to a different CDC alert (even sketchier link)…..
WHATEVER.
Here is that final CDC alert. Only the top 3 paragraphs are important here.
Let me quote the text of those first 3 paragraphs for Zoe. I will make BOLD what is important.
Dear Partners in Prevention,
December 20, 2021
I’m writing to share the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) alert sent to clinical laboratory staff and health care providers about a syphilis test. The alert reports that false reactivity, or “false-positive,” Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR; non-treponemal) test results, when using the Bio-Rad Laboratories BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR kit, can occur in some people who received a COVID-19 vaccine and includes recommendations for addressing these potential false positives.
Historically, false-reactive RPR test results have been observed in people with systemic infections unrelated to syphilis, such as tuberculosis, rickettsial diseases, and endocarditis.False-reactive RPR testing also has been previously observed following immunization (specifically following smallpox vaccine). False reactivity with RPR can also occur during pregnancy.
Per CDC’s 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines, reactive RPR results should always be confirmed with treponemal testing (e.g., Treponema pallidum particle agglutination, TP-PA). This is, in part, because of the above-mentioned issue: false-positive nontreponemal test results can be associated with multiple medical conditions and factors unrelated to syphilis. According to FDA’s alert, treponemal testing for syphilis does not appear to be impacted by this issue.
Allow me to translate.
It turns out that “being vaccinated for COVID-19” throws off an ANTIBODY-BASED SYPHILIS TEST, and can give false positives.
The reason is that these are a sort of antibodies against substances released from cells attacked by certain diseases and conditions. Thus, they’re not exclusively the downstream product of syphilis.
Normally, certain diseases, certain vaccines, and pregnancy can all throw off this more rapid but less conclusive syphilis test, and that is part of the reason why people are supposed to follow up this easier test, with a test that looks for the actual organism which causes syphilis.
Thus, we have added one more cause for the test to be thrown off.
This is not the same as the HIV test that was thrown off by a particular Australian vaccine, because the antigen in the vaccine actually contained an HIV protein (gp41) as part of the vaccine, and created antibodies against HIV. I talked about that last week. That was a much more direct test interference, easily expected.
How a Psycho Vaccine Marrying the Infamous COVID Spike Protein to HIV’s Neurotoxic gp41 Was [Allegedly] Canned by a Mere Testing SNAFU How Australia Dodged The First Mad Vax Bullet of the WEF Scamdemic / Plannedemic Darwin Award Vaccine Featured Insane Merger of HIV and COVID But Failed Due to Buggering of AIDS Tests, NOT …
What I find interesting is that one of the things that normally sets off the syphilis test is endocarditis.
Endocarditis, which is inflammation of the inner surfaces of the heart, is one of the three main heart inflammations, thus being pretty damned close to myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the outer sac), both of which have very prominent correlations to the jabs.
So while this means that – NO – the shots are not giving people syphilis – the shots ARE basically acting like an illness, and very much like a known cardiac illness.
You were warned.
Now – while I was researching syphilis, I became interested in the treatment with compounds of mercury.
Traditional mercury-based pastes were used in cures. Whilst this was partially effective, the toxic side effects of the mercury probably outweighed any advantages.
This is actually a HUGE understatement.
It turned out that arsenic was considerably better.
It wasn’t too long after that success, that penicillin took over as the real cure for syphilis.
I will come back to MERCURY in a future post, because I found something quite amazing in its history.
But if you look ONE COLUMN TO THE LEFT and TWO ROWS UP…..
COPPER is also bacteriostatic and algicidal – and at concentrations below where it is a health risk. And THAT leads back to a DRINK that Grandmaintexas introduced us to……
Moscow Mule Revisited
Based upon my reading of Grandma’s post on the subject, the Moscow Mule simply is not a proper Moscow Mule unless it is served in copper vessels.
The health effects of COPPER are about as debatable as the effects of mercury – although, in general, copper is much less toxic, so when it’s being “not good for you”, it’s a lot less “not good for you” than lead. At the same time, copper is much MORE toxic to things like algae, fungi, plant roots, and other “pests”, than it is to us, and that is why it is found among the gardening pesticides in hardware stores. The antimicrobial activity of copper is extremely well-documented, but appears to be complex. Simply having copper in the household or workplace environment seems to have health benefits – and this was particularly noted back in the days of less sanitary environments. Water passing through copper fixtures tended not to spread disease.
We tend to forget about OLD SCIENCE, so we can’t put new things into good perspective.
LEAD and other CHEMICAL ADVANCES saved us from the horrible BIOLOGICAL diseases and maladies of the uncivilized life.
Did they have chemical consequences? Yes. The TRICK is REMEMBERING AND ADMITTING OLD RISKS AND BENEFITS while also DISCOVERING AND ADMITTING NEW RISKS AND BENEFITS, then BALANCING HONESTLY with the PROPER PRIORITIES which put PEOPLE FIRST.
It is VERY easy to see where CDC went off the rails with the COVID-19 vaccines, being unable to admit old benefits (of lasting immunity to caught and treated diseases), while also being unable to admit new risks (of vaccines using untested and immature technologies).
Likewise, looking back, it is easy to see that basic sanitation – not vaccination – REALLY conquered diseases. Vaccines came in, mopped up, and took all the credit, by design, because bad people realized that vaccines in the hands of a technological elite, combined with an ignorant populace they can essentially murder and experiment on at will, allow them to basically FARM HUMANITY.
Sorry, Bill Gates. We understand your social engineering of us. We know your M.O. We know your real intentions. Including for the “people of color” you pretend to care about.
You will note that, in general, the further down the periodic table one goes, the more toxic the metals. Surprisingly, the second-lightest one – beryllium – is quite toxic, but even lightweight aluminum simply isn’t all that bad, in the big picture (but you’ve got to keep it on the OUTSIDE). In contrast, if you get down and heavy there with mercury, thallium and lead, or even as far down the table as cadmium and indium, the metals can be quite toxic.
Lead used to be used for plumbing – enough to lend its name to the profession. Copper then took over – before plastic began to displace copper. Nevertheless, copper is still highly valued for plumbing, as well as for electrical wiring.
As noted above, copper in drinking water is an interesting beast. Lead and copper in drinking water are controlled by the EPA under something called the Lead and Copper Rule, or LCR. Note that the linked document, which talks about the most recent “upgrade” to the rule, is over 400 pages. Yeah – there is a MESS of goofiness outside the actual rule there. Most of the concern is about lead, which is now highly restricted. Here is all that is said about copper’s toxicity in the linked explainer:
Acute copper exposure causes gastrointestinal distress. Chronic exposure to copper is particularly a concern for people with Wilson’s disease because they are prone to copper accumulation in body tissue, which can lead to liver damage, neurological, and/or psychiatric symptoms. For a more detailed explanation of the health effects associated with copper see Appendix E of the final rule Economic Analysis (USEPA, 2020). EPA did not propose revisions to the copper requirements; thus, the final rule does not revise the copper requirements.
Copper is basically off the hook at 1.3 ppm or below. That number has not been upgraded. Why is that level important? In my opinion, it’s because copper is bacteriostatic and algicidal in practice at between 0.1 and 1.0 ppm. Thus, one can SAFELY DRINK water which is being purified against microorganisms with copper.
And THAT would include the Moscow Mule, depending upon how long it sits.
I refer you now to an excellent article, which relies on a breathless scaremongering headline, but actually DOES provide a balanced set of viewpoints on both the DANGERS and BENEFITS of dietary copper.
Sipping This Popular Cocktail Is a “Health Hazard,” Experts Say
AFTER 27 MINUTES, YOU MAY BE AT RISK OF HEAVY METAL POISONING.
First of all, copper isn’t really a “heavy metal” IMO, but whatever. It’s heavier than some.
You will note, after reading at the link, that you have to drink a ton of Moscow Mules, or a few that have sat around for a very long time, to MAYBE get sickened by them.
In general, avoid drinking acidic things that have been in contact with copper for a long time, and you will be OK.
Remember – most household water has sat around in copper pipes for quite a while at neutral pH, and it’s simply not toxic (due to copper). You DO get less lead if you flush your water 30 seconds before getting drinking water, but again – we’re talking about levels that would make Romans, Victorians, and even people from 70 years ago howl with laughter at our prissy over-concern – even knowing the science.
Perspective is very important – as you are about to see in a beautiful example of the failure of modern science, thanks to CCP socialism infecting both global science and science publishing.
Failure of Socialized Science and Peer Review Exposed in a JAMA-Published Ivermectin Study
The fact that Pierre Kory now calls JAMA “PHAMA” is a nice short way of saying that medicine has been utterly taken over by the pharmaceutical industry, and IMO set back several thousand years. Hippocrates would be HORRIFIED by what has happened to medicine – and I say that as somebody OUTSIDE medicine, and a lot closer to the pharmaceutical industry.
IMO it’s too late to save the pharmaceutical industry from scandalous criminal survival – but it’s not too late to save the profession of medicine from utter moral death. And thus, you will be treated to my following scientific opinion.
Steve Kirsch doesn’t play defense. He saw how JAMA (the Journal of the American Medical Association) completely FUMBLED an ivermectin paper, and how Pierre Kory picked it up off the ground, taking complete control, but more or less just standing there, lamenting the bad refs and horrible cheating. So Kirsch did the only thing he does. He grabbed the ball from Kory and ran it back for a touchdown.
“New JAMA paper show Ivermectin blows the COVID vaccines out of the water”
This is an utter reversal of the conclusion of the paper.
All because some guy in the stands named “Massimaux” spotted the free ball and yelled “FUMBLE!!!”
If you understand science, and science publishing, then you will see that what Kirsch did here was BRUTAL. And I’m gonna show you where all the bruises and black eyes are.
I almost feel sorry for JAMA, but not enough to miss this opportunity to LEAP ONTO THE DOGPILE and give AMA’s hare-brained PC leadership a good WEDGIE.
Don’t worry about the AMA. They’re protected by Pfizer, Biden, and the media. And just like any good mafia arrangement, as long as AMA keeps saying the right things, and not saying the wrong things, everything is gonna be OK.
Everything but science. But that’s OK, too.
We’ll take care of things. Just like we did here.
Here is the Kirsch gab that grabbed my attention.
Repeating for Zoe, as well as our silicon friends…..
“Wait a second. I thought there was some paper just out that Alex Berenson said was basically the end of ivermectin, although scientifically, I know that’s pretty much impossible. I know there is SOME explanation for why this paper (which I have not read yet) has to be deviating in some way from the MANY papers that show limited but solid efficacy – and especially against DEATH – just like HCQ. But this CANNOT be the same paper. No way! Kirsch would not be saying this unless the results were stunningly IN FAVOR of ivermectin, and there is no WAY that some authors with a NEGATIVE-LEANING study would be……. I mean….. WHAT THE HELL????”
SO – I just stopped to see what in the hell paper Kirsch was talking about.
Now we’ve discussed (in the comments on this site) Berenson’s very weird attack on Robert Malone when they appeared together on Fox News, which didn’t make sense THEN, but which does NOW – and I will explain that momentarily. But first, back to Kirsch.
Kirsch explains that – YES – this paper states in BOTH its abstract and its conclusion the following:
“The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.”
However, that is NOT what the data says.
Certainly not to everybody.
Certainly not to me.
In other words, DIFFERENT scientists (like Kirsch, Kory, me, and an anonymous Twitter poster names Massimaux, who found the key issue) have looked at the data, and see something quite different.
Kory goes into a rather long analysis of the whole war against ivermectin, but Kirsch digs into Kory’s article and then finds and elucidates the key nugget – discovered by Massimaux – that just ends the arguments.
It helps to read this in Kirsch’s article, but if you’re going to be lazy, I’ll explain here.
Here is Massimaux’s tweet:
In the I-TECH study, of 490 patients, 241 got Ivermectin and 331 were vaccinated.
Can we compute the vaccine effectiveness AGAINST DEATH and Ivermectin effectiveness AGAINST DEATH? Yes, we can! See the figure.
Look at the bottom line in the two tables and compare. Not only is ivermectin CLEARLY better than the vaccine at preventing death – the significance of the result is significantly greater.
If the efficacy of ivermectin against death is not true, then very little else in the study is true.
This data says that ivermectin is exactly what we’ve been saying it is. It’s not a miracle cure, but it WORKS – particularly in preventing DEATH – its only real purpose. That result is IN THE PAPER. It is IN THE DATA. And if the authors want to argue that it’s not in the data, because it’s not significant enough, then nothing ELSE is in the data, because most everything else is even LESS significant.
Now it’s very important to realize that this nice little pair of tables FROM THE DATA is not due to the original authors – it’s due to a POST-PUBLICATION “peer review” by somebody who looked at the very same data, and PROVED using the authors’ own data that they were WRONG to say that the data didn’t support use of ivermectin.
So why did the authors tack on that wrong statement?
Did the EDITORS make them tack on that statement? Did the AUTHORS tack it on to get the paper to publish? Or is the “peer bias” against ivermectin, mostly due to the media, SO STRONG that scientists didn’t even look through their own data to see a conclusion they didn’t want to see?
Or is it a combination of ALL of these?
It is clearly in the data that ivermectin is three times as effective as the vaccines in preventing death. Even more importantly, if you add in what is known OUTSIDE the paper in question – namely the adverse effects of the vaccine and the safety of ivermectin, then it’s a no-brainer to NOT take the vaccine and to just use ivermectin. And Kirsch explains THAT rather nicely.
The data LITERALLY justify our position.
This was my hunch all along, and as vaccine side effects loomed larger and larger, and ivermectin proved to be rather shockingly harmless, even at antiviral doses comparable to large-animal systemic antiparasitic doses. All ivermectin had to do was prevent death to some moderate extent, and it was a no-brainer that people should take it.
To conclude anything else, based on the data, is murderous folly, in my opinion.
When I was a young lad – a mere student – but also one who WROTE PAPERS (because I had a great professor who TRAINED US to be full-blooded scientists), we EXPECTED to be CRITICIZED in peer review by people exactly like Steve Kirsch, Pierre Kory, and myself. We expected that others would look at data and see it completely differently.
And we would then have to ACKNOWLEDGE the alternative interpretations, or convince the editors that the criticism was not even worth acknowledging (a VERY rare occurrence in any legitimately contested field).
My lab had PRACTICE criticizing other people’s work – and we expected it in return. I personally found quite a few errors in the literature. Most were small – mostly problems of the writing – but some were huge and affected the science. Sometimes the big errors would only partially alter the author’s conclusions, but other times they had a significant impact.
However, I have to admit that I never ran into data which PROVED THE OPPOSITE of the authors’ main conclusion – even if only to the critic – and THAT is what we have here.
PEER REVIEW is designed to subject a paper to (hopefully at least TWO) critical readers who will very likely DEMAND improvements. Those improvements often mean acknowledging DIFFERENT views of the data as being possible and maybe even reasonable.
That kind of QUALITY peer review was VERY OBVIOUSLY not done here.
What we have RIGHT HERE is a demonstration that HERD REVIEW is much more important than PEER REVIEW.
PEER REVIEW is subject to BIAS. It is subject to SUBVERSION and GAMING.
I go back to the Zhang mask paper, for crying out loud.
To me, this will always remain a horrifying example of “fitting the data to the theory”, rather than looking to see what the data says. You can just look at this graph and see the crime.
I lay this stuff SQUARELY at the feet of SOCIALISM, which has politicized science and removed control of science from the people of science themselves, investing much of it in a media which WILL NOT question government narratives. People raised under socialism who become “go-alongers” – and so SOME degree that is everybody – stop questioning things that need to be questioned.
I have WATCHED and I have SEEN how WEF and CCP corruption have degraded science everywhere.
They’re not going to fix this stuff – at least not yet.
But until then, know this:
Ivermectin WORKS, and it was just proven by people who said it doesn’t work.
Thanks to HERD REVIEW.
One last point.
Why did Alex Berenson not see this?
IMO, it’s because Berenson is simply not a scientist – he’s an investigative journalist. Thus, his virtue-signaling attack on Malone was meant to show “journalistic balance”, NOT that he himself had deeply researched the history of the topic, in which case he (Berenson) would have likely said “Yes, Malone really is the most foundational of the founding fathers of the tech.”
But let’s not blame Alex too hard. THE AUTHORS OF THIS STUDY – that’s right – the authors themselves – didn’t see it, either.
See what I’ve always said? Real science is contentious.
But it has a good heart.
It wants the TRUTH.
ENJOY THE SHOW.
Thank you all for being here. Have a great weekend.
How a Psycho Vaccine Marrying the Infamous COVID Spike Protein to HIV’s Neurotoxic gp41 Was [Allegedly] Canned by a Mere Testing SNAFU
How Australia Dodged The First Mad Vax Bullet of the WEF Scamdemic / Plannedemic
Darwin Award Vaccine Featured Insane Merger of HIV and COVID But Failed Due to Buggering of AIDS Tests, NOT Because of the Obvious Risks
Was It Ever Really For COVID? The gp41 HIV Protein is a TOP Target For AIDS Vaccines
How Science Monetization and Corruption Has Broken All Vaccine Safety Mechanisms and Made Sneaky Liars Out of Scientists
Mood Music
Intro – Prepare To Be Shocked
This is one of the craziest stories your either never heard, or barely heard. I am certain of the following. Nobody ever spelled out to you how NUTS this failed vaccine really was. This absolutely bonkers vaccine, that was almost used on all Australians.
The fact that nobody even followed this story, shows that the captured corporate media is absolutely not doing its job. Either THAT, or their job is to help deceive us.
And you know where my money is on that.
Surely, in the past, both journalists and scientists might have said something to the effect of “Hey – marrying a cardiovascular pathogenic bat virus spike protein and a neurotoxic AIDS protein in a vaccine to prevent a cold seems a little weird.”
BUT NO. NOT NOW.
And yet, some of us, few as we might be, might still have some questions.
We assume – ASSUME – as in ASS / U / ME – that all people in all of science are acting in all of our best interests all the time.
I have been completely broken of this spell, and I can tell you – what I can see now is not pretty.
I need to prepare you for what I’m about to tell you.
State of Corruption of Vaccine Science
First, a fantastic interview of Dr. Robert Malone by Tucker Carlson. It’s very folksy and long – a bit over an hour – but it will absolutely cure you of any idea that science in 2022 has not been almost totally corrupted by money, power, and SECRET AGENDAS.
This guy Malone is as close to a Moderna insider / honest outsider as you’re gonna get, and he clearly sees the dirty play from the Moderna point of view.
Hat tips to FG&C and GA/FL for keeping this video in play. Gail has been pumping this video, too. EVERYBODY need to watch this.
Indeed, let’s just save that tweet as an image, in case Twitter decides Jack is becoming too much of a liability.
One of the biggest BOOMS dropped in the video, IMO, is the fact that Robert Malone WARNED the FDA about the toxicity of the spike protein, and they SHRUGGED IT OFF.
Yes. Malone gave them documentation, as asked, and they came back to him and said everything was OK. And THAT is when he started to think something was very wrong.
We’re about to do it AGAIN – only I’m not the first – I’m just rediscovering an obvious “why the heck are they doing THAT” point.
But we’ll get to that in a minute. We need to broaden our list of corrupt suspects.
You see, corporate “science” isn’t the only bad actor here. What about governments that conspire with the corporations to “mandate” their products for a mutual PAYOFF?
It turns out that both Justin Trudeau and the Canadian government have a very large incentive in mandating the broken, dubious, and just plain BAD Moderna and Pfizer “vaccines”.
When you realize that Justin Trudeau is not only following his mandate madness for WEFfian ideological reasons, and for Papa Fidel power, but also for CASTRO CASH, you understand what’s REALLY going on.
SO – now that you realize THESE PEOPLE care more about other things, than they care about us, the following will make more sense.
The Frankenvax That Almost Was
So just today, FG&C posted THIS TWEET which made me go WTF…..
Basically, an Australian COVID vaccine that falsely triggers AIDS / HIV tests was recalled. The vaccine was NOT sent out for use by the public, because it gave people positive AIDS tests.
GREAT, but…..
WHY did the vaccine do this? And by the way….
Didn’t this happen BEFORE – like over a year ago?
I could have SWORN this happened before.
Is this OLD NEWS or a DIFFERENT VACCINE?
Or did they bring the SAME vaccine BACK?
Or even worse….. AND logic…..
You see, I remember something just like this bit of news, over a year ago. It was some vaccine from an Australian university that accidentally triggered AIDS tests.
Well, when I looked closer at this, it turned out to be THE SAME NEWS. Meaning that this recent tweet was just OLD NEWS.
HOWEVER – I happen to know a lot more now, a year later, so I dug DEEPER and FOUND MORE.
And now I want to explain to you, exactly what is going on.
Because this monster AIN’T DEAD.
VolksWackcine 451
Let’s begin by looking at the actual announcement that all this news came from. The paragraph in BOLD is the critical one. If you’re going to TL;DR past all the rest, read THAT paragraph.
Friday, 11th December, 2020: The University of Queensland (UQ) and CSL today announce that the Phase 1 trial of the UQ-CSL v451 COVID-19 vaccine has shown that it elicits a robust response towards the virus and has a strong safety profile. There were no serious adverse events or safety concerns reported in the 216 trial participants. However, following consultation with the Australian Government, CSL will not progress the vaccine candidate to Phase 2/3 clinical trials.
The University of Queensland commenced a Phase 1 trial of their COVID-19 vaccine candidate – v451 – in July 2020, to assess safety and immunogenicity in healthy volunteers. CSL was working towards taking responsibility for the Phase 2/3 clinical trial and large-scale manufacture of the vaccine, upon completion of successful trials.
The Phase 1 data also showed the generation of antibodies directed towards fragments of a protein (gp41), which is a component used to stabilise the vaccine. Trial participants were fully informed of the possibility of a partial immune response to this component, but it was unexpected that the levels induced would interfere with certain HIV tests.
There is no possibility the vaccine causes infection, and routine follow up tests confirmed there is no HIV virus present.
With advice from experts, CSL and UQ have worked through the implications that this issue presents to rolling out the vaccine into broad populations. It is generally agreed that significant changes would need to be made to well-established HIV testing procedures in the healthcare setting to accommodate rollout of this vaccine. Therefore, CSL and the Australian Government have agreed vaccine development will not proceed to Phase 2/3 trials.
The Phase 1 trial will continue, where further analysis of the data will show how long the antibodies persist, with studies so far showing that levels are already falling. The University of Queensland plans to submit the full data for peer review publication.
UQ Vice-Chancellor, Professor Deborah Terry, said while the outcome was disappointing, she was immensely proud of the UQ team who had shouldered a heavy burden of responsibility while the world watched on. “I also want to thank our many partners, our donors – including the Federal and Queensland Government – and of course the 216 Queenslanders who so willingly volunteered for the Phase 1 trials.”
UQ vaccine co-lead, Professor Paul Young, said that although it was possible to re-engineer the vaccine, the team did not have the luxury of time needed. “Doing so would set back development by another 12 or so months, and while this is a tough decision to take, the urgent need for a vaccine has to be everyone’s priority.”
“I said at the start of vaccine development that there were no guarantees, but what is really encouraging is that the core technology approach we used has passed the major clinical test. It is a safe and well-tolerated vaccine, producing the strong virus-neutralising effect that we were hoping to see.
So we will continue to push forward and we are confident that with further work the Molecular Clamp technology will be a robust platform for future vaccine development here in Australia and to meet future biosecurity needs.
Dr Andrew Nash, Chief Scientific Officer for CSL said “This outcome highlights the risk of failure associated with early vaccine development, and the rigorous assessment involved in making decisions as to what discoveries advance.”
“This project has only been made possible by the innovative science developed by world-class scientists at The University of Queensland and the strong collaboration between our organisations, and many others, over the last 10 months. CSL and Seqirus are committed to continuing our work to protect the Australian population against COVID-19. Manufacture of approximately 30 million doses of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine candidate is underway, with first doses planned for release to Australia early next year. In addition, CSL has agreed at the request of the Australian Government to manufacture an additional 20 million doses.”
UQ and CSL acknowledge the support of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) in partnering to enable the rapid development of the vaccine candidate through clinical trials.
So what they’re saying is that this vaccine – which uses the HIV protein gp41 – sets off HIV tests. And THAT made the test unacceptable to move forward. The remaining phase II and phase III trials were cancelled, while the phase I trials continued to finish collecting data.
And WHILE they say that the phase I testing showed that the vaccine was safe and effective, if you look more closely, they only tested it on 216 people.
We KNOW from the Moderna and Pfizer tests, that even after HUGE phase II and phase III trials, using thousands or tens of thousands of participants, there are serious side effects that are STILL not discovered until actual roll-out to the public, when millions receive the shot.
And that does NOT include long-term effects. We know NOW that this determination can be critical in many cases.
And one more point for the record. As you can see by the statement at the end of the press release, this vaccine was supported by the Bill Gates organization CEPI.
Yeah, that CEPI, and THAT Bill Gates.
Like I say, CEPI is how Gates gets TWO VOTES, and GAVI is how he gets THREE.
So the bottom line – this vaccine was killed because it set off AIDS tests.
But let’s dig a little deeper into that.
So What’s With HIV and the COVID Vaccines?
When I first heard about this particular Australian vaccine (UQ-CSL v451, or v451 hereafter) triggering HIV tests, my immediate thought was that this might be proof that the Indian researchers were CORRECT – that the spike protein really contained those four inserts from HIV, and that THIS was setting off tests for HIV.
Later, I heard that – no – there was actually some segment of HIV protein being used in the v451 vaccine INTENTIONALLY. Thus, the whole problem seemed stupid, the use of the HIV protein seemed short-sighted, and I promptly forgot about it. No smoking gun – just a stink bomb.
However, a year’s time changed all that.
Think how different the perspective is now.
virus almost certainly came out of a biowarfare lab in China with PLA/NIH ties
Fauci, Dazsak and minions now known to have LIED about origins
Fauci gang also lied when pooh-poohing the Indian HIV insert hypothesis
mRNA vaccines seem to be producing immune deficiency, a.k.a. “VAIDS”
there are working hypotheses now which explain immune deficiency
Fauci’s history with HIV mirrors current history with COVID – lies and hidden agenda
Fauci seems to be obsessed with immunodeficiency and vaccines
Fauci promoted bad killer drugs as treatments in both cases (AZT, remdesivir)
Fauci seems to have an agenda clearly counter to truth as we know it, and is likely serving something beyond the increasing “fake” science which the public believes is operant in the world, but which is very likely a “reduced set” intended to deceive us
Thus, with all that WEIRD background, it NOW seems a bit “par for the course” that somebody in that world would want to bring HIV into the COVID equation.
But is that a good idea?
Now – before I go talking about why this might be a BAD idea, I want to give you plenty of references as to why they SAY it was a good idea.
Let’s start with a good explanation of why the false positives occurred. This article includes a lot of information on the v451 vaccine itself.
The article mentions, without too much detail, that the HIV protein is part of a “molecular clamp” – a trimeric molecular “holder” of spike protein molecules. This holder allows three molecules of any attached spike-type protein to stay locked into a rigid, parallel conformation, which will remain in the desirable pre-fusion (with a cell) configuration, and not change into the useless post-fusion configuration.
The article also links to a scientific paper on the technology:
Prior to 2020, the threat of a novel viral pandemic was omnipresent but largely ignored. Just 12 months prior to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic our team received funding from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) to establish and validate a rapid response pipeline for subunit vaccine development based on our proprietary Molecular Clamp platform. Throughout the course of 2019 we conducted two mock tests of our system for rapid antigen production against two potential, emerging viral pathogens, Achimota paramyxovirus and Wenzhou mammarenavirus. For each virus we expressed a small panel of recombinant variants of the membrane fusion protein and screened for expression level, product homogeneity, and the presence of the expected trimeric pre-fusion conformation. Lessons learned from this exercise paved the way for our response to COVID-19, for which our candidate antigen is currently in phase I clinical trial.
Here is part of a really good graphic from the paper.
You can see how it’s possible to produce a spike protein with the “molecular clamp” attached, and then simply let this recombinant construction TRIMERIZE (form a triple, side to side) around the three molecular clamps, and thereby stabilize the three spike protein molecules next to each other.
This is a bit like a “motif” within an actual virus, where spike proteins, sticking out next to each other, protect each other’s sides. THAT is the basic idea of this thing.
Remember how Novavax assembles a bunch of spikes via modified ass ends into a kind of antigenic cloved apple, to create a kind of fake virus? Same very basic principle.
Indeed, the molecular clamp is even a bit like TWO motifs, since gp41 serves a somewhat similar purpose in the HIV virus, being the root of a stalk to an attack mechanism.
HIV-1 fusion process. It involves both subunits of the envelope spike complex. Notably, gp41 is shown in green with its transmembrane region buried in the virion membrane, both segments of heptad repeats (CHR closer to the virus and NHR closer to the host cell) before and after conformational changes, and the N-terminal end of the ectodomain in gray. In the last two panels pointed out by the red arrows, gp41 is observed following penetration of the host cell and following a conformational change resulting in the six-helix bundle which brings the viral and cell membranes into close proximity.
So – in a very real sense – this whole “vaccine” thingie is a literal marriage of HIV and coronavirus – the simplest possible one.
And they didn’t tell you ANY of this shit – did they?
So all of that WORKS, but the problem is that antibodies don’t just form to the attached spike protein – they ALSO form to the “molecular clamp”, meaning to the gp41 protein.
And what does that mean?
An AIDS Vaccine in Disguise?
The people who made the v451 vaccine say they didn’t expect there to be so much antibody response to the gp41 parts of the vaccine, thus triggering HIV tests.
You know what?
I don’t believe them.
I think they were gaslighting us all along.
Part of this is due to the fact that I’ve seen gp41 named numerous times as a potential basis for subunit vaccines against HIV. In fact, in one reference, I saw it named as THE BEST HOPE for an AIDS vaccine.
They didn’t mention that? LOL. OH, REALLY.
So WHY would anybody be using gp41 as part of an antigen, and not expect it to generate antibodies?
In fact, one might almost look at this v451 vaccine and regard it as an HIV vaccine, with spike proteins tacked onto gp41 as a kind of “nasty adjuvant” to initiate the immune response to the HIV protein.
Seriously – which is the real target here – COVID or HIV? Or BOTH?
This looks to me like a perfect example of…..
WAIT FOR IT….
“REVERSO”.
But let’s just set that aside for now, and pretend that the thing which COULD be a vaccine for EITHER ONE of the two things they stuck in it, is REALLY a vaccine for the fakey-fake cold that we don’t need a vaccine for, and NOT a vaccine for the sexual disease that stands in the way of Luciferian scum creating their polyamorous sexual paradise of literal epic random phuckery.
OMG, these people have just lied, and lied, and lied again. And they will KEEP lying.
But we’ll pretend they’re not lying, for just a little while longer.
So if we have an actual COVID vaccine here…..
…..is it a good idea to include the HIV gp41 protein subunit?
Well, after what we’ve seen with the spike protein, I was thinking maybe it wouldn’t be.
And it turns out, I wasn’t the first person who thought of this.
Doorless Carp’s Suspicious Cat In A Box
When I went looking for the toxicity of the gp41 protein, one of the first things that came up was some guy or gal who appears to have been actively suppressed on Twitter, eventually banned to Gab, and whose substack article on the topic has only two likes – ONE OF THEM MINE.
Doesn’t mean the article’s not important. And I think it’s about to get a few more hits.
This is a wonderful article that is simply SKEPTICAL of the entire “it was pulled because of triggering AIDS tests” reasoning.
DoorlessCarp read the same press release I cited above, and pokes and prods it from the point of view of somebody who knows a heck of a lot about HIV and AIDS, and doesn’t buy what (s)he’s reading in that press release. Something doesn’t sniff right to “them”, and “they” spell out the issues.
I will attempt to summarize DoorlessCarp’s concerns (noted as “DLC” hereafter).
First, DLC admits to actually being led to the problem by one of those Fake News “straw man fact checks”, which attempt to either “debunk” facts or mislead scandals by setting up an adjacent strawman and knocking it down. OBSERVE.
“Fact check: An Australian vaccine trial did not give trial participants HIV”
LOL. No. The truth they’re protecting is that the “COVID vaccine” gave them HIV antibodies, and it was very likely the whole point.
To quote DLC about the Aussie vaccine researchers: “I wouldn’t let these clowns dispense aspirin, let alone design fast tracked vaccines.“
DLC then makes this statement, noting that there is a curious skew between the reality of HIV testing and the idea that there is some kind of a problem here.
Interesting rapid response to the effect that antibody only HIV tests have long since been debunked as a diagnostic tool on their own due to cross reactivity from other antibodies. They don’t tell you anything useful.
DLC then quotes extensively from this letter which explains why HIV testing via antibodies is actually a rather horrible mishmash of false positives and negatives, ultimately requiring a clinical diagnosis and “validation by lifestyle facts”.
Which leads to the next section, which I quote:
So what was the real reason for pulling the Australian trial, was it the gp41 toxicity?
The antibody problem raises more questions than it answers as spike S2 has homology to P24, GP41 and GP120.
This is dark stuff, P24 has been ported straight across from HIVs capsid to the spike protein. Here’s the proof, at least as far as what specific antibodies are telling us, which don’t lie:
What is p24 antigen?
“One distinctive HIV antigen is a viral protein called p24, a structural protein that makes up most of the HIV viral core, or ‘capsid’. High levels of p24 are present in the blood serum of newly infected individuals during the short period between infection and seroconversion, making p24 antigen assays useful in diagnosing primary HIV infection.”
suspects the real reason for pulling the vaccine was the toxicity of gp41
notes that the spike protein already has potentially dangerous homologies to three HIV proteins, p24, gp41 and gp120
p24 is basically the nucleocapsid protein of HIV
p24 tends to be detected early in the AIDS process, before antibodies to it form
DLC then cites several papers demonstrating that there is already a lot of understanding of antibody cross-talk between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and either (1) original SARS-CoV proteins, and (2) HIV-1 proteins.
In the latter case, there is specific interaction with gp41.
References given:
The SARS CoV-2 spike directed non-neutralizing polyclonal antibodies cross-react with Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) gp41 (Dec. 2021)
DLC then lays the hammer down on the fact that gp41 is responsible for the dementia of AIDS.
I’m including the whole thing here.
Pathology:
Accumulation of β-Amyloid Precursor Protein in Axons Correlates with CNS Expression of SIV gp41 (2002)
“In this study, a strong association (p = 0.005) was identified between elevated axonal β-APP levels and the amount of SIV gp41 present in white matter, implicating HIV/SIV gp41 as a mediator of axonal damage.“
Mechanisms and Structural Determinants of HIV-1 Coat Protein, gp41-Induced Neurotoxicity (1999)
Abstract
Of the individuals with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, 20–30% will develop the neurological complication of HIV-associated dementia (HAD). The mechanisms underlying HAD are unknown; however, indirect immunologically mediated mechanisms are theorized to play a role. Recently, the HIV-1 coat protein gp41 has been implicated as a major mediator of HAD through induction of neurocytokines and subsequent neuronal cell death. Using primary mixed cortical cultures from neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS) null (nNOS−/−) mice and immunological NOS null (iNOS−/−) mice, we establish iNOS-derived NO as a major mediator of gp41 neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicity elicited by gp41 is markedly attenuated in iNOS−/− cultures compared with wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures. The NOS inhibitor l-nitroarginine methyl ester is neuroprotective in wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures, confirming the role of iNOS-derived NO in gp41 neurotoxicity. Confirming that iNOS−/− cultures lack iNOS, gp41 did not induce iNOS in iNOS−/− cultures, but it markedly induced iNOS in wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures. We elucidate the region of gp41 that is critical for iNOS induction and neuronal cell death by monitoring iNOS induction with overlapping peptides spanning gp41. We show that the N-terminal region of gp41, which we designate as the neurotoxic domain, induces iNOS protein activity and iNOS-dependent neurotoxicity at picomolar concentrations in a manner similar to recombinant gp41 protein. Our experiments suggest that gp41 is eliciting the induction of iNOS through potential cell surface receptors or binding sites because the induction of iNOS is dose dependent and saturable and occurs at physiologically relevant concentrations. These data confirm that the induction of iNOS by gp41 and the production of NO are primary mediators of neuronal damage and identify a neurotoxic domain of gp41 that may play an important role in HAD.
“I wouldn’t let these clowns dispense aspirin, let alone design fast tracked vaccines.“
Is gp41 a danger? It may well be. And nobody is asking the question, because (IMO) the neural pathogenic initiator that gp41 is, was passed off as a “molecular clamp” instead of the REAL ANTIGEN.
If they’re going to resurrect this weirdo COVID-HIV vaccine – and YES, they’re thinking about it – then there needs to be some examination FIRST of what the HELL is going on.
So What The Heck Is Going On Here?
When I was a young lad in the old days of science, there was lying, misrepresentation, and thievery, but it was on a much smaller scale.
We used to joke very cynically, back in the ’70’s, that every natural product being synthesized in a laboratory cured cancer, because we all knew that was not true.
We knew that these substances were really being synthesized merely because the molecules were a synthetic challenge, and a way for professors to make a name for themselves in synthetic chemistry. Almost NONE of these substances would EVER be used to treat cancer, and most would wash out very soon upon investigation. Almost none of them would ever even LEAD to a useful cancer drug. But LYING about their importance was how people got money for their labs. Every structurally interesting new molecule was always the next savior – until it wasn’t.
I used to think that the people giving out the money were fools about this, but not any more. I am beginning to think that the “givers” have always been just as corrupt as the “takers” – they’re just the “insiders” who turn on the spigots for their fellow “outsiders”.
I have no reason to think that vaccines are any different.
I think that a false crisis was used as a massive MONEY-BOMB – a global pile-on of the giddiest and most corrupt kind.
Probably the biggest one in 20 years.
I think that an AIDS vaccine was passed off as a COVID vaccine, by plausibly passing off the natural function of the HIV subunit as a new tool for other things, because – well – it IS such a new tool – just like every new interesting molecule MIGHT actually be some amazing new drug that cures cancer.
They lie skillfully, and they lie with truth, and it’s almost impossible to PROVE that the secondary “oh by the way” was actually the primary motivation.
We have changed from white lies that everybody understood WERE lies, to much more devious lies where scientists engage in fooling not just the public, but even other scientists.
I do think we have to wake up now. We can no longer afford the luxury of pretending not to know.
If I have to thank Joe Biden and his puppetmasters, including his “handler” Obama, for anything, it is for WAKING ME UP with these stupid mandates.
Nothing worked so well, to show us that the NEW WORLD ORDER is a direct threat to humanity, and needs to be stopped.
Science can be good again. But it must never, ever, abandon TRUTH.
While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.
Christmas Spirit
We still have lights up all over the area. LOL!
Hey – how about we just keep believing?
And now, the rules of the pub.
HOUSE RULES
God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.
Now, back to business.
AMEN!
Free the January Brothers
(no matter what the SHANGHAI SLIDER says)
Current Art On The Wall
We ordered a crate of ivermectin from Mexico, and instead got a box of counterfeit paintings marked “L.A.”.
We’re selling the paintings to make enough back for a new order of ivermectin.
As a Gab Pro member, I just got an email about the opening of the Gab Marketplace, which is now best described as a rudimentary “Gbay” precursor, using Gab Chat (the integrated version, not the end-to-end encrypted one) as the negotiating mechanism.
Here are some exemplary screenshots. Click on them to enlarge.
The landing page…..
Electronics…..
Beauty…..
There are no bells and whistles now, but the goal is to soon integrate GabPay, their PayPal substitute that has been under development for some time now.
Here is the text of the email.
Introducing the Gab Marketplace, a giant leap forward for the Parallel Economy on Gab!
GabPRO members can create listings for a variety of categories including books, electronics, tools, home goods, and more.
Anyone can view Gab Marketplace listings, ask about its availability, and chat with sellers to buy their items.
The Gab Marketplace can also be explored without having a Gab account and listings can be shared anywhere.
Gab does not handle transactions for Marketplace listings yet, but we will be integrating GabPay, our Paypal alternative, once it is live.
Sellers and buyers must converse amongst themselves regarding purchasing listings. We have many different categories and listings are filling up quickly, be sure to check back often to see new listings added.
We’ve also created a Job Board and Classifieds section in the Gab Marketplace.
Sell those electronics you haven’t used in forever, sell that Christmas gift you never opened, or anything in-between!
We have seen some of these already, alleging things like “pandemic stress” being responsible for clot-shot cardiac consequences. Those were bad, but now it’s just becoming ludicrous.
It’s very clear to me that the “Fake News” has been tasked with trying to GET PEOPLE TO INNOCENTLY RATIONALIZE the downstream effects of the FAILED plandemic and clot shot plot, whatever those might eventually be proven to have involved.
Trump really tried to get people to see the MEDIA ROLE in regard to “climate change” – that CLIMATE ALARMISM was basically a SIMULTANEOUS media hoax on both scientists and non-scientists.
As long as the media will defend the LIE that science itself, individual scientists, and scientists as a group, are ALL in full, 100% control of what they themselves think, then the TRUTH that the media controls what science thinks and says can be hidden from the public.
It is only NOW – at a moment when many scientists are WAKING UP to what the media has done TO THEM, and are actively TURNING IT OFF, that they realize the media was LEADING THEM.
Let me state this clearly.
FAKE SCIENCE – controlled by the media – is one of the greatest dangers to humanity EVER.
FAKE NEWS is used to lead Fake Science – to hint subconsciously to science and scientists where it’s “going”.
FAKE ENTERTAINMENT is used to normalize Fake Science – to raise the barriers to questioning it.
IT IS YOUR DUTY TO PERCEIVE AND REJECT FAKE SCIENCE.
Being moderately scientifically literate is now a SURVIVAL SKILL, just like being politically literate, or even being just plain literate.
We will continue to bash fake science here, and I personally will continue to appreciate all examples of it that you may find and bring here, because dissecting and analyzing fake science is one of the best ways to fight it.
REAL SCIENCE is making a comeback, and YOU, DEAR AND PATRIOTIC CITIZEN, are part of that GREAT AWAKENING.
Malone and Bhakdi Validated by “Pro-Vax” Paper
On Monday, I covered a recent paper coauthored by Dr. Peter McCullough, which hypothesizes that documented failure of the mRNA vaccines to activate the interferon system, in combination with documented migration of both vaccine-induced spike protein and specific interferon-suppressing microRNAs via exosomes, is behind a variety of health problems associated with the current COVID vaccines.
The hypothesis of this paper is based on rough but obvious signals from VAERS, existing mRNA vaccine data in the literature (interferons and related species, microRNAs, exosomes), and known mechanisms which would explain the VAERS signals if connected to the vaccine data.
I was only partway through that paper, when I was saying to myself “Good grief – why are we even USING these vaccines, much less mandating them?”
Now, as a kind of second strike, Malone has found a paper which not only confirms his suspicions and fears of mRNA vaccine problems, but which also perfectly confirms Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi’s contention that the mRNA vaccines are producing too much of the WRONG antibody type and none of the two more desirable types.
Let me cite the beginning of this post – up to where Malone poses the big question.
A Health Public Policy Nightmare
Vaccine spike antigen and mRNA persist for two months in lymph node germinal centers… protein production of spike is higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients!
Vaccination confers broader IgG binding of variant RBDs than SARS-CoV-2 infection
Imprinting from initial antigen exposures alters IgG responses to viral variants
Histology of mRNA vaccinee lymph nodes shows abundant germinal centers
Vaccine spike antigen and mRNA persist for weeks in lymph node germinal centers
The hidden highlight (lede) buried in this peer reviewed paper is that protein production of spike in people vaccinated with the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine is higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients! A person might ask, “How could that be?” In order to understand this, we must carefully analyze what the study shows.
I urge you to finish reading Malone’s post about this paper.
I ALSO urge you to read the paper itself (PDF is public), which looks at the same data, and cheer-leads vaccines, stating but otherwise ignoring EVERYTHING that Malone and Bhakdi are concerned about. Ignore the parts you can’t read – there’s plenty that you CAN read, and it is very instructive.
I will attempt to explain the difference between the two views of the same results, but let me give you the Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF).
The original paper was researched and written while the participants were fully under “Gates Vaccine Mind Control” and “Fauci Antibody Hypnosis”, both of which cause scientists to rather blindly follow the laser-pointers which control their outlook on vaccine science.
Gates: Vaccines are the only legitimate way to fight viral disease.
Fauci: Antibodies which I designate determine if a vaccine is safe and effective.
These are the lies of SMART SCIENCE LIARS, because they’re difficult to prove untrue in a way that normies can understand.
As Robert Malone notes, one of the most important facts in the paper [that the vaccines produce more spike protein than even severe cases of COVID-19] is a “buried lede”, although I would go further and state that it was never buried, because it’s not even a concern to the authors.
Once one accepts a priori that:
vaccines are good
vaccine side effects are obvious, immediate, and allergic in nature
spike makes antibodies, and antibodies are good
concerns about the spike protein are misinformation
…..then it is pretty much impossible for these COVID vaccines to do any wrong.
Just ask a scientist, who believes all these things BECAUSE OF THE MEDIA.
More spike protein means more antibodies, and more antibodies is good – RIIIIIGHT?
And if there are problems, it’s the vaccine working! Just ask Jabcinda Ardour!
ANTIBODY HYPNOSIS WILL DO THAT. Under antibody hypnosis, anything which contributes to antibodies which Fauci highlights, is “good” – all other antibodies or other responses are either bad or irrelevant.
The authors of the paper make sure to say all sorts of good things about vaccines, and never say anything critical, despite the fact that they’re sitting on all kinds of evidence that something is very wrong with these mRNA vaccines.
Example:
The appearance of virus variants, waning antibody levels after infection or vaccination (Falsey et al., 2021; Levin et al., 2021), and breakthrough infections in previously immunized individuals (Keehner et al., 2021) indicate that periodic vaccine boosting of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is warranted.
REALLY? Some of us scientists believe the exact opposite – that these diverse FAILURES indicate that a vaccination strategy is dubious if not highly UNWARRANTED – but OUR view is called “misinformation”.
Seriously – it’s like hypnosis. The authors of the paper CANNOT SEE the things that Malone points out, or that Bhakdi pointed out.
Likewise, the problems which WE can see were clearly NOT found in “peer review”, precisely because the PEERS are for the most part just as much under vaccine hypnosis and antibody hypnosis as the authors, so real and deep questions about the jabs are simply never going to get asked. And if any peers DO recognize the problems, they will keep their mouths shut, or “test the waters” gently, to see if any concerns are allowed.
Those who CAN see the problems, know enough to keep their mouths shut, if they want to remain players in the Science Game.
I go back to what I said earlier about the media – including the science media – including journals – literally CONTROLLING what scientists think – and that scientists have no clue. Sad.
Anyway, now that I’ve provided background of what is going on here – a “pro-vax” paper in which Malone finds shocker evidence of problems, let’s discuss the specifics that Malone found, and that Bhakdi also predicted.
One of the first things that Malone catches is the persistence of both the mRNA and the spike protein in lymph node germinal centers – lasting for WEEKS instead of a few days. Note that this perfectly matches a clinical case that we featured here on these pages!
I have here an absolutely fascinating video (end of article) from Gab TV that fits right into everything I know about COVID-19 and the spike protein vaccines, like the last piece of a puzzle. The video is just under 1/2 hour in length, but it is FILLED with little AHA moments. An extremely articulate, healthy, …
Basically, this woman (on the left) got “long haul COVID” symptoms from a JAB – including massively swollen lymph nodes that lasted for WEEKS. That led to a lot of permanent damage. What she experienced is now explained PERFECTLY by what Dr. Malone postulates.
AND I NOTE THIS AS WELL. What Dr. Malone postulates (below), is exactly what The Ethical Skeptic noted as a CONCERN on Twitter in 2020, before the vaccines ever arrived! Yes, I have not gone looking for his tweet, but TES specifically noted that these vaccines are not “actual” mRNA vaccines – they are PSEUDO-mRNA vaccines.
WHUUUUUUUUT?????!!!!!
Yes. To evade immune protection from foreign mRNA, the vaccine mRNA uses a “pseudo” base to trick the human immune system into thinking it’s not mRNA, even though it works the same way. It’s something of a beautiful hack, but it’s a hack.
Malone:
One very real hypothesis is that the substitution of pseudouridine for uridine to avoid the immune response is working so well that the mRNA is completely evading the normal clearance/degradation pathways. Hence, mRNA that is not being incorporated into cells at the injection site, is migrating to the lymph nodes (and throughout the body as the non-clinical Pfizer data suggest?) and continuing to express protein there. In this case, the cytotoxic protein antigen is spike. Spike protein can be detected for at least 60 days after administration of dose. Note that the duration of the protein expression was only tested for 60 days.
But it gets worse. After reminding us of the pathogenicity of the spike protein (merely citing others), Malone reminds us that the use of pseudouridine to evade immune cleanup is not actually necessary in mRNA vaccines – but it IS (and this is rather horrible) PATENTABLE as an “improvement”.
Again, Malone.
To note: The use of pseudouridine in these mRNA vaccines is not the only option. It has often been hypothesized that the reason Dr. Kariko added pseudouridine to the mRNA vaccine was to make an improvement to the original mRNA patents that I was an inventor on. An improvement to an existing patent allows commercialization of that patent. It is an old trick. Remember, that Curevac does not use pseudouridine in its formulation and it is not required or necessary for a significant immune response. In the next generation of mRNA vaccine experiments (hopefully done in an animal model), it is clear that the issues of adding pseudouridine need to be addressed prior to any more of these vaccines going into humans.
So how much spike protein does this stuff produce? Again, Malone.
Knowing what we know about the spike protein in these vaccines, the study quantitatively measured spike protein levels in plasma after vaccination. Which, it turns out, are higher than the levels observed in a person with a severe COVID-19 infection. Just to write it, the fact that this only now being discovered or it it was known, released to the public is criminal in my opinion. This should have been characterized long ago, including prior to beginning human clinical trials.
That this has not been published or investigated more demonstrates the gross regulatory dereliction of duty by Pfizer, Biointech, Moderna, NIAID VRC and that whole crew. Using these vaccines, which include pseudouridine without fully understanding the implications and without the FDA requiring a complete pre-clinical toxicology regulatory package, including long-term follow-up, as is done with any other unique chemical or adjuvant additive is shocking. Then there is the novel use of the unique nano particles being used in these vaccines, which also were only marginally assessed, as shown by the Japanese Pfizer data.
Protein expression is not being turned off, because the immune response against the mRNA/pseudouridine complex is either not happening or is ineffective. It may also be that the mRNA/pseudouridine complex has a longer half-life than normal mRNA. The In either case, this is regulatory nightmare.
I do not know how to write this more strongly. This technology is immature. The WHO has approved six, more traditional vaccines, all of which the US government could license. These genetic vaccines are not the only option.
And just to make sure you get it, Malone quotes the relevant parts of the paper, and says it again.
Read that again: Protein production of spike is higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients!
As an understated closer, without mentioning him by name, Malone adds how THIS paper confirms a concern that Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi had about THE WRONG ANTIBODY TYPES being produced by the vaccines.
The paper also notes that the antibody response is IgG, not IgA or IgM. IgA and IgM antibodies produce a strong mucosal immune response needed for respiratory diseases, unlike IgG.
Finally, Malone makes this statement.
This Substack article has only skimmed the surface of the implications of this paper in terms of both the science and the malfeasance on the part of our government and pharmaceutical corporations. There is more to come on this issue.
You will note that, by implication, the AUTHORS of this paper clearly said nothing indicative of malfeasance. Now it may be entirely possible that they were “getting out truth” while keeping their heads out from under any funding guillotines, but they clearly evidenced no overt concerns for any problems.
And THAT is how FAKE SCIENCE works, my friends.
Lastly, let me add one of my own “concerns”.
Allow me to repeat the authors’ own highlights of the paper, for commentary.
Vaccination confers broader IgG binding of variant RBDs than SARS-CoV-2 infection
Imprinting from initial antigen exposures alters IgG responses to viral variants
Histology of mRNA vaccinee lymph nodes shows abundant germinal centers
Vaccine spike antigen and mRNA persist for weeks in lymph node germinal centers
To these FOUR items, I have FOUR responses, all of which I know Karl Denninger will get.
Leaving aside IgG being the wrong antibodies (see above), BINDING antibodies can still, also, be “wrong” (or more accurately “inappropriate”) antibodies, depending on what happens next, including enhanced variants and ADE. NEUTRALIZING antibodies are the “most appropriate” kind. BINDING antibodies may or may not help. So DO NOT take this point as an automatic score for the vaccines. In my humble opinion, NATURE is likely smarter than Pfizer and Rochelle Alinsky on what to do here.
Original antigen sin. They’re calling it. “Imprinting.” It means that every exposure to an antigen can potentially MISLEAD the immune system for the purposes of the next exposure. Great. SO – how confident are you folks that these vaccines are giving a superior “imprinting” to natural infection? I am NOT confident, and in fact, I believe that the “pseudouridine error” is proof that NIH, Pfizer, Moderna, CDC, CEPI, and all the rest are not even remotely competent to choose the best “imprinting” for children. They are choosing the one that gives themselves the most power, control, and money. SHAME!
The vaccines are going to the lymph nodes. Well, well, well. Not only does this destroy the establishment TROLL talking point about vaccine localization in the deltoid muscle – it provides a nice explanation of the exosome-based spread of the spike protein and interferon-suppressing microRNAs.
Persistence of vaccine and thus-produced spike in the lymph nodes lasts for weeks. Add to this the liberation of spike protein in LIPID-BASED EXOSOMES into the bloodstream. What’s that going to do? Why, it’s going to SPREAD SPIKE IN LIPIDS to other places where lipids collect. Which means spike ends up in other organs. Which can potentially include organs (like skin and other glands) which SHED LIPIDS. Which includes breast milk (dead infants in VAERS) and skin oils (see prior posts on this blog, where my incredulity about “shedding” was overcome). AND don’t forget the ovaries. Etc.
So – that is where we are.
And where is Fake News on this? Totally absent.
We’re not only the news now.
We’re the science now.
ENJOY THE SHOW.
Thank you all for being here. Have a great weekend.
As a young science student in the 1970s, I never would have thought that I would have to correct the American and global media over an issue of late 19th century basic science, but yet, here we are.
When basic theories of MATTER and CHEMISTRY proved that “Compound A created by one route has the same properties as compound A created by a different route”, science got a hold of a very simple but very revolutionary idea – that substances had assignable responsibilities for things. Further still, that we could PROVE THIS, and then use it in both diagnosis and cures.
This was the beginnings of the scientific theory of DRUGS and PHARMACEUTICALS.
I was PART OF THIS INDUSTRY. I learned about its history. I marveled at its beautiful truth.
But yet NOW – shamefully – to defend a corrupt pharmaceutical industry that literally controls our government, on behalf of other governments, our media will without shame DENY the most basic truths about how drugs and biochemicals work.
What is even MORE SHAMEFUL is that the global pharmaceutical industry KNOWS that I’m right – and yet in CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE, they allow the idiot media to defend them with insanity that THEY THEMSELVES swept away 150 years ago.
SO – what I am going to do here is to SHAME OUR MEDIA – our unscientific media – for embracing VOODOO theories of disease, as 150-year-old BASIC SCIENCE stares them in the face.
Let me begin by stating the bottom line right up front.
Anybody who thinks that cardiovascular pathology in recipients of spike protein vaccines is due to anything other than those very same spike protein antigens – which were BORROWED FROM THE DISEASE that causes the very same cardiovascular pathology – is denying the most basic science of drugs and disease.
Let me state that just a little MORE clearly.
It is impossible for vaccines to use a known molecular pathogen as an antigen, and NOT engender risk of pathogenicity due to that very same molecular pathogen.
Do you understand this?
If you take a poison to gain immunity to the poison, and you suffer poisoning typical of the poison, it was probably the poison, and probably not “stress”.
Good GOD – I cannot believe that I actually have to SAY THIS to adults in America in 2021, almost 2022.
But lets keep beating this into mushy skulls……
COVID-19 does bad cardiovascular things
COVID-19 virus has a spike protein
the spike protein is how COVID-19 does the cardiovascular bad things
the spike protein is how the vaccines “pretend” to be COVID-19
the spike protein by itself does the cardiovascular bad things
vaccines CREATING spike protein can thus do the cardiovascular bad things
This is actually very simple, because it’s OLD science.
Here is how we might play it out with the poisonous protein “ricin”.
ricin is a poisonous protein
we could try to make a vaccine against ricin, using ricin
we could give people an mRNA vaccine that “makes” ricin in their cells
the recipients would then have antibodies against ricin
some people who would get the vaccine would get ricin poisoning
the idea that the ricin poisoning was due to “stress” would be absurd
Are you starting to see this?
TO HYPOTHESIZE that GIVING a poison to a person, where the recipient then GETS poisoning typical of that poison, is not in fact RESPONSIBLE for causing the poisoning typical of the poison you just gave the person, is NUTS.
Actually, it’s beyond that – it’s NUCKING FUTS.
To hypothesize that there is some mysterious “stress” that causes EXPECTED SIDE EFFECTS from what we just gave the person, is so ridiculous, I could actually call upon the NIH to publicly CONDEMN major media for going along with this stuff – except for one thing.
The pharmaceutical companies that CONTROL the NIH AND the media are in fact the ones that make the poison and sell the product, and are trying to deny the obvious side effects of the poison.
WELL THAT’S GREAT.
Well, at least *I* spoke the truth.
Now – you may be wondering why I have not even pointed to a REFERENCE yet.
Well, not only is this stuff that EVERY college graduate should understand – MOST high school graduates should understand it, too.
In fact, anybody who has taken a fucking aspirin should understand this.
“If you take aspirin, and you have a side effect typical of aspirin, it was probably due to the aspirin, and not voodoo stress.”
This is SCIENCE. This is BASIC. FREAKING. SCIENCE.
It is SO basic, it is not in the literature. It is assumed that you understand this to even be able to begin to READ the scientific literature.
It is time to call people to account for these most basic things.
I want you to understand the following.
On honesty alone, I am more qualified to be the CEO of Pfizer than is Albert Bourla.
If Bourla does not explain this most basic truth to the people of the world, then he is a scientific FRAUD.
If Anthony Fauci does not explain this most basic truth to the people of the world, then he, too, is a scientific FRAUD.
I told you the truth. Bourla did not. Fauci did not.
My dear wife is the one who found this, so let me start off by thanking her.
After working outside Tuesday night, I came in the front door, and my wife IMMEDIATELY told me to start watching what was on OAN. It was an anonymous Rumble video about ivermectin and remdesivir that OAN re-bannered and broadcast, after being unable to identify or contact the author.
I’m very glad OAN decided to promote this video.
I caught only part of the ivermectin story, but ALL of the remdesivir story, and THAT was enough to get me searching for an online copy of the video for all of the readers here.
You can watch the OAN-rebannered video at the following link. (The original video is below.)
‘The Story Of Ivermectin’ Sheds Light On The History & Benefits Of The Drug
OAN Newsroom UPDATED 12:30 PM PT – Wednesday, October 13, 2021
Despite doctor testimonials, clinical trials and international studies showing the efficacy of Ivermectin, mainstream media continues to suppress information regarding the drug as a treatment for COVID-19.
One America News would like to shed light on the history and the benefits of Ivermectin by showing a video recently posted to Rumble by a user called ‘Temporarily Grounded.’
While we could not make contact with the user, we urge our viewers to email via our contact page at oann.com if you have any information on the video’s creator, including his name and direct contact information.
Fortunately, the original video is still on Rumble.
This video basically shows the solid background of ivermectin, including some truly excellent and unbiased scientific information. However, about halfway through, it switches gears, and talks about the suppression of ivermectin.
The latter quickly segues into the promotion of remdesivir – and THAT is where it’s really, really powerful.
Who, you might ask, is behind remdesivir?
It’s SHOCKING – it’s not who you would expect – and you NEED to watch.
Beyond that, the documentary explains exactly how the bias for remdesivir was built into the trials – and that, too, is shocking.
I have been trying to warn people just how FAKE science is right now. This documentary backs me up BIG TIME. Thus, very glad to share it now.
Fauci and Pfizer have painted themselves into a bit of a corner.
I now believe that they “played a charade” on boosters – that boosters were their intent all along.
I think this WHOLE scam was very intentional.
But it gets far, far worse. I think I see that they have an agenda much bigger than the COVID scam.
And I think I see what that agenda is.
This is very hard to see, but I think that maybe some other people are going to be able to see it, so I’m throwing this out there in hope that those people MIGHT see this.
Let’s go progressively backwards in time.
The LATEST outrage is the Project Veritas revelation – in the words of Pfizer’s own scientists – which really shows you how utterly AMORAL or even IMMORAL the management of Pfizer really is.
Please watch this if you have not already.
H/T Sundance, Deplorable Patriot, and many others.
The big point that you need to get out of this, is that the management of Pfizer is NOT interested in doing the best thing for people. EVERYTHING that you have seen from them – the hiding of the vaccine migration data – the ripping off of countries – the manipulation of FDA against competitor J+J – it’s all confirmed by what Pfizer’s own scientists say.
And to top that all off, these scientists ADMIT what we all knew, and always knew – that natural disease-conferred immunity is SUPERIOR to vaccine immunity.
Likewise, if anybody around here has been as SHOCKED as I am, about how badly ISRAEL is now treating EVERYBODY – Jews, Arabs, whatever – with their draconian mandates and “Vaczi” passports – well, maybe it’s not so much of a surprise.
What a bunch of play-acting. THE DRAMA – IT BURNS.
The HYPOCRISY is meant to DISTRACT from the MESSAGE OF COMPLIANCE that SELLS PRODUCT.
Do you see how the propaganda works here? They think we’re stupid. No. We’re just as wise as the MAGA husband who comes home and finds the wife ISRAEL in bed with A DRUG REP.
OY VEY.
But it gets worse.
This earlier video, which has also been discussed both here and at CTH, has a VERY important point that takes a while to sink in.
Again, please watch this if you have not already.
Or maybe not.
[ NOTE – YouTube video REMOVED – old URL: https://youtu.be/ZwR7natWqLk ]
The biggest point is the final one, which the good doctor starts setting up at 10:00, and which he really gets down to at about 11:00 – that the COVID vaccines are actually SETTING UP BREAKTHROUGH INFECTIONS.
Yes.
I want you to read that again.
It appears that the jabs are making people MORE susceptible to the evolving virus.
This makes TONS of sense from an evolutionary perspective – which is why I have to laugh at all my liberal non-scientist friends who hate God, SWEAR that they believe in evolution, but would never believe what I’m about to tell you.
As you know from my prior discussion of viral evolution…..
OK – we’re going to have some fun here – but stick with me, and you could learn A LOT. Cue the music! Borrowed from Wheatie! Previous posts helped put both the SPIKE PROTEIN DISEASE and the SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE into deep perspective. We were seeing that the SOLUTION was a significant part of the …
…..one of the best ways to look at a virus and one or more hosts, is to see how they all negotiate to a state of equilibrium, which then appears (because it IS) evidence of DESIGN. The design is just at a near-mathematical level – like a program that adapts and installs itself – rather than a cruder model that requires ridiculous microscopic interventions at every possible juncture.
Things work out for the benefit of LIFE, because we live in a PRO-LIFE universe. But the question is exactly HOW that works out. It may not be as SIMPLE in some ways as you think it might be – or conversely it may be SIMPLER.
We’re only humans, and we have a lot to learn.
And we could learn a LOT from space-time distributed, parallel-processed intelligence, a.k.a. LIFE.
Just like all our latest vaccine tech is bad mimicry of natural technology invented at least 70 million years ago (read the article – it’s fascinating), so our latest attempts to immunize ourselves are not even that.
These vaccines, which use our “next tech” but not our “best tech”, are corrupted by human GREED and DUPLICITY. Bluntly, Fauci, Pfizer and Moderna SCAMMED President Trump. They had a terrible motivation to push LITERAL “bleeding edge” vaccines, instead of more obvious and safer vaccines. That motivation was not to solve their phony crisis – it was to usher in gene therapies by using the same technology as a kind of false hero in a pandemic, riding on Trump’s coattails.
They needed “real science” to SHUT THE FUCK UP, while their FAKE SCIENCE cured their FAKE PANDEMIC with a FAKE HERO.
Dr. Nathan Thompson, in the video above, discovered that the vaccines are – at least in some fraction of people – LOWERING general immunity – and this appears from all data to be to everything EXCEPT a single VIRAL VARIANT which is about to SHIFT to a NEW VARIANT. And we now know that even THAT limited immunity wanes rather quickly.
But we knew that. We knew that ALL ALONG.
Go back in time, before Fauci LIED and said that everything we knew was wrong.
We KNEW that you don’t make vaccines to colds – and that you barely make them to the flu. We knew that coronaviruses were problematic. We knew that vaccines to them are plagued with failure, in some cases caused by phenomena like ENHANCEMENT, where the vaccines make catching the disease EASIER or WORSE.
We knew what these viruses are like. We knew what they were like DECADES AGO. And yet, the disgusting MEDIA played us into a state of credulity, where even expert scientists with the most basic and well-grounded knowledge from over a century of virology were not allowed to state the obvious, if it contradicted our rotten, lying CDC.
Something is VERY wrong there.
Stop and think about it.
They are pushing a vaccine that reduces immunity to everything EXCEPT the VERY specific thing they vaccinated you for – which disappears. So the net effect is to make things worse in all possible ways.
Reducing overall immunity is exactly what Trump WARNED US ABOUT.
The cure can’t be worse than the disease.
BUT IT IS.
And I am going to argue that they knew this ALL ALONG.
Take a look at these screen shots.
If you have ANY kind of modern primary care physician, then you get these reports at least once a year, from the lab tests that your doctor orders.
RIGHT? Am I right?
You can actually compare THESE EXACT NUMBERS – not the CD4 and CD8 cells, which are specialized, and you probably don’t get tested for, unless you have AIDS or another immunosuppressive disease – but everything else will show up on YOUR lab results. Sometimes they say “Granulocytes” and sometimes they say “Neutrophils”, etc., but you can look at the “normal” ranges and match things up very nicely.
You can compare YOUR immune results with the ones in the video. But that’s not my point.
YOU KNOW PFIZER WAS DOING – OR COULD EASILY HAVE DONE – BASIC LABS ON THEIR TEST SUBJECTS.
They had to do the basics – right? Maybe not the people in the trials that everybody was watching – maybe they “overlooked the basic tests” very “accidentally” or by some rule – but somewhere, somehow – there is no way that Pfizer didn’t run the most BASIC immune function tests – THAT WE ALL GET – on at least some test subjects – and discover exactly what we are discovering now.
They had to know what was happening, and what this meant.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
If you have a virus, largely created by your friend in NIH, named Fauci, and his friends Baric and Daszak, and their friend Shi in China, and you have a vaccine for it that ONLY CREATES VERY SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES that your friend Fauci focuses on like a hypnotist, but otherwise the vaccines lower immunity and cause disease in general, and this virus changes itself quickly enough that boosters are continuously needed, or maybe only to the point where the vaccine harms immunity enough that the virus doesn’t HAVE to change……
Are you seeing what is happening here?
THE GENERAL LOWERING OF IMMUNITY IS KEY.
This is what counteracts ANY “good” that Fauci focuses on.
These vaccines are the ultimate damned heroin.
COVID vaccines are not heroic. They’re HEROIN.
Let me explain this again, in comparison to NATURAL IMMUNITY.
Natural immunity is the result of EVOLUTION – so it’s SMART. It knows from adaptive experience that a RIFLE SHOT at what just hit you will do no good – but a BLAST from a SHOTGUN will hit the bug the NEXT TIME IT COMES BACK DIFFERENT.
That is why the broad-based but complex immunity conferred by the DISEASE is BETTER than “just a few antibodies specific to yesterday’s villain.”
Nature KNOWS BETTER (by now) than to try to hit the shape-shifter where it was last standing.
Fauci doesn’t know better.
OR DOES HE?
I think he DOES know better.
And I think that Rand Paul, who is VERY SMART, is scaring Fauci because Fauci knows Rand is onto him.
I am no longer thinking these people are stupid.
I think they are very smart.
I think they are RINGERS.
I think they’re up to something.
Making money to continue their program is part of it, but not ALL of it.
They have a goal – the goal is NOT for our benefit.
I believe that these things are components of their agenda.
lower human immunity to disease AND to genetic modification
implement gene therapy as a gateway to genetic modification of humans
increase government’s power to complete medical control of humans
change humanity in a Fabian way – create some socialist human ideal
And THAT takes me back to something Cthulhu said, which has stuck with me.
Fauci was up to something VERY similar with AIDS. He wanted a vaccine desperately. He didn’t want to treat AIDS, but eventually he HAD TO – and when he finally did, it was remdesivir all over again.
And what I’ve come to realize, is that IF there had been a “working” vaccine for HIV / AIDS that worked anything like these terrible coronavirus vaccines, that vaccine would have LOWERED HUMAN IMMUNITY in the same dubious strategy – as the “prevention” for a disease that lowers immunity.
Do you see how WRONG and WEIRD that is?
You know – something is just “not right” with all this.
I’m not taking this vaccine. And I sure as hell hope YOU aren’t taking it either.
Featured Photo: Meeting of the War Crimes Executive Committee, which decided on the arrangements for the Nuremberg trials. Note the garage pull in the background – Exhibit F1b.
I am dying of the China Virus. I had the virus itself in the latter half of January, 2020. I became symptomatic on January 18, and thus working backwards by 5 days, I estimate that I got it on January 13 – either from friends who had traveled internationally, or from documents they carried which had been handled by Iranians. I’ll never really know.
The only other person at that meeting who got the China Virus was my wife, who did not get it at the meeting, but later. It is likely that she got it from me on roughly January 19 or 20, given that she became symptomatic around the 24th or 25th.
My wife passed it to one other person, who passed it to their spouse, and that seems to have been the end of our chain.
For various reasons – otherwise known as comorbidities – I suffered hypoxia and lung damage, whereas my wife did not – nor did those who got it from her. Nevertheless, she does seem to have milder chronic effects such as peripheral pain and clotting issues, which could be related to the virus. Strangely, her prior problem with nose bleeds has vanished.
My wife’s symptoms were otherwise identical to mine except for hypoxia and lung damage. Both of us had the same “dry cough”, mild fever, exhaustion, weird headache and kidney aches, etc. She was also taking vitamin D for osteoporosis therapy – I was only taking a multivitamin with a low dose of vitamin D. I highly recommend vitamin D to prevent severe China Virus symptoms. I believe that it spared my wife.
My chronic symptoms are interesting. They are mostly cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and pulmonary. You may learn more about them later in this article. I have some highly diagnostic clotting issues as well, which are specifically known to be RISKS for the coronavirus vaccines.
It is inadvisable for either me or my wife to take a coronavirus vaccine, given that I already have excellent immunity, the “clot shots” appear to degrade that immunity, and recoverees are 2 or 3 more likely to have side effects from “the jab”. That, in addition to my specific contraindications.
You will understand shortly that it would be MURDER to give me a coronavirus vaccine. It would also be MURDER to give my wife one. And to give one to a child, is going to be SCANDALOUS MURDER of the worst kind.
Consequently, I consider all people who want to give me, my wife, or anybody else, a coronavirus vaccine, as MURDERERS.
I do not consider such people, who would mandate a murderous injection – this really bad vaccine – to be much better than the CCP, the Nazis, or the Soviets.
So maybe by now you are STILL wondering – what is this “Nuremberg II” all about? Glad you asked.
My Nuremberg Wake-Up Call – Stew Peters
This tweet from Stew Peters, which I saw on Gab, really resonated with me.
During the Nuremberg Trials, even the media was prosecuted and put to death for lying to the public.
He’s not lying – I can show you pictures from the Nuremberg Trials.
Since Stew might get bounced from Lying Twitter any time, I save the above tweet as an image.
The only problem is that we ONLY prosecuted National Socialist Lying Press. We did NOT arrest Bolshevik Socialist Lying Press, who started the whole thing, by driving Germany INSANE.
My mother knew the Nazis as a child and a teenager. She dodged through their crazy system, growing up, doing whatever she needed to do, not to be killed. She had so many strikes against her, if anybody knew ALL OF THEM, she was as good as dead. Very few people knew ANY of her strikes. Only she and her family knew all of them. The family kept the most dangerous strike secret. You can now understand why my mother thought that FAMILY is so important.
My mother was classified as “racially impure”. That was not a death sentence – but if combined with other bureaucratic criteria, it could be. She was half-American – part American Indian – and her German side was “not pristine”. Her grandfather, still the family patriarch, was a Mason, but apparently had enough connections or excuses not to be arrested.
My mother was not brave like Sophie Scholl, the college student who was killed by Hitler for printing pamphlets criticizing the Nazis and their war crimes. No – my mother was a survivor. A very cunning one, cowardly one moment – brave the next, who stayed one step ahead of the Gestapo by learning to LIE her way through the system.
But what my mother DID do was to serve as a WITNESS TO HISTORY. She saw the Holocaust, and how REAL it was. She saw horrible things that she told me in great detail – so that SOMEBODY would remember.
Polish survivor Jadwiga Dzido shows her scarred leg to the court, while expert witness Dr. Alexander explains the nature of the medical experiment performed on her in the Ravensbrueck concentration camp. Dzido and Alexander were appearing as witnesses at the Doctors Trial.
The experiments were performed by defendants Herta Oberheuser and Fritz Ernst Fischer, on November 22, 1942.
Medical Socialism
In the 1970’s, I remember being in a car, laughing hysterically with a Jewish friend, smoking cigarettes, driving home from college, joking about the weird, occasional, bizarre, seemingly mentally ill “health nazis” who talked about regulating smoking and junk food. We knew this idiocy they dreamed of would never happen – COULD never happen. This was AMERICA. This shit does not happen in AMERICA. MAYBE in Russia. Definitely not in America.
Have another COKE! No Diet Coke here. Plenty of sugar for plenty of energy!
Banning smoking? BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Good one!
What’s next? Sugar? HAHAHAHAHAHA! Hilarious! These health nazis. They’re CRAZY.
Oh, my goodness. I was such a fool. I could NOT make the connection to my mother.
My mother’s big, deadly secret was a horribly deformed back, with one God-given blessing. It looked absolutely normal with clothes on.
She had learned over her lifetime to keep it a secret. She always dressed in the closet, with her back away from the door. I only saw it ONCE, by a combination of accidents, when, as an adult, she made the mistake of walking out of the closet to speak with my father, not having shut the bedroom door completely, not knowing I was still in the house, and I turned and looked through the slightly open door.
I was utterly shocked. It looked like something from the films Alien or Species.
My mother hid it through the entire Nazi nightmare, except when she was forced into one examination. The doctor saw her back – as he moved around her next to the wall – but he lied to the nurse and said she was fine.
There WERE good people – but they had to pick and choose the exact right moments to ACT AGAINST THE MACHINE.
And I’m here to tell you, EARLIER IS BETTER.
Here is how bad medicine got in Nazi Germany.
Between September 1939 and April 1945 the defendants Karl Brandt, Blome, Brack, and Hoven unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly committed war crimes, as defined by Article II of Control Council Law No. 10, in that they were principals in, accessories to, ordered, abetted, took a consenting part in, and were connected with plans and enterprises involving the execution of the so-called “euthanasia” program of the German Reich in the course of which the defendants herein murdered hundreds of thousands of human beings, including nationals of German-occupied countries. This program involved the systematic and secret execution of the aged, insane, incurably ill, of deformed children, and other persons, by gas, lethal injections, and diverse other means in nursing homes, hospitals, and asylums. Such persons were regarded as “useless eaters” and a burden to the German war machine. The relatives of these victims were informed that they died from natural causes, such as heart failure. German doctors involved in the “euthanasia” program were also sent to Eastern occupied countries to assist in the mass extermination of Jews.
Now, this “euthanasia” part is just the extreme. We see SIGNS of this, like Cuomo and his health people deliberately infecting nursing homes, but we are not realizing that much of the DAY-TO-DAY COVID CRAP is actually quite NAZI.
HERE is a lady, still alive who remembers ALL of what we are seeing now, happening under the Nazis. (Hat Tip to Singingsoul for finding this for me. I had remembered seeing videos of her before, but had forgotten her name.)
Just listen to her. She looks at COVID COMMIES, and she sees COVID NAZIS.
Are you starting to see how bad of a situation we are in?
I need to talk about why – if you don’t want to be like me – you don’t want the jab.
The Clot Shot
What I’m going to show you here is REMARKABLE.
On the bright side, this Twitter thread EXPLAINS my China Virus case PERFECTLY. It explains every aspect of my cardiovascular and pulmonary symptoms. But why? It’s not about the virus – it’s about the vaccine.
Yes. Even though it’s about the VACCINE, it’s about the SPIKE PROTEIN – the CLOT PROTEIN – something that my case and the CLOT SHOT have in common.
But on the bad side – yeah. It’s VERY bad health news for a lot of us.
But on the good/bad side, it’s enough to send ANYBODY who advocates mandatory vaccination to a TRIBUNAL followed by PRISON or EXECUTION.
Seriously. THIS NEWS is all the justification needed for ANY non-Nazi portion of our military to begin arresting the COVID NAZIS who are pushing vaccination mandates, if they don’t STOP.
Vaccine mandates must stop immediately.
We need to LEARN from failure – NOT keep pushing it.
Time to explain.
Hang onto your testicles. It’s a hell of a trip.
(1) Pfizer vaccine causes HUGE (5-6X) reduction in the most important antibodies, while jacking up the “addiction antibodies” which FAIL on the next variant (are you starting to see how the addiction works?)
(2) EVERY recipient of the Pfizer vaccine is excreting the remnants of PEG in urine, most likely from the “pegylated graphene oxide” trade secret (molecular razor blades, absolutely unreal they used this shit).
(3) The “clot shot” isn’t just some recipients – it turns out that tests shows clotting is happening in MOST people getting the spike protein vaccines. They’re not BIG clots that are easily spotted – they’re small clots that need testing to show up.
(4) This is the clinical effect of the clots from the vaccines, and it is IDENTICAL to what the disease did to me. It causes lung damage not visible on X-rays, and that damage stresses the heart by pulmonary hypertension. The good news from my own experience is that PULMONARY VASODILATORS (like magnesium) are VERY HELPFUL.
(5) More boosters = more clots = more damage = faster death. The vaccines MUST be stopped. If Pfizer wants to redeem itself (remember – Nuremberg II), it needs to STOP VACCINE PRODUCTION and FIND PULMONARY ANTIHYPERTENSIVES AND VASODILATORS.
(6) Here you see the worsening with the third booster. I predicted this – ask people on this blog. I told people – DO NOT GET THE THIRD SHOT. That is where this goes fentanyl-level and you’re not gonna last. Anybody who keeps pushing vaccines and mandates, and that includes SECDEF, needs to be ARRESTED, knowing what we know now.
The chief epidemiologist in Iceland was CORRECT when he said we have to transition to NATURAL HERD IMMUNITY. Yes – he was CORRECT, until the LYING PRESS browbeat him into the INSANITY NARRATIVE.
He was RIGHT before he was “corrected by the socialist media” – which happens to science all the time now.
We have to catch it early, treat it, survive it, and have great immunity.
1/ Stunning news from Iceland – among the world’s most vaccinated countries – today.
Facing a huge new #Covid outbreak that translates into ~100,000 new US cases a day, the country’s chief epidemiologist now says natural infection is the only way to reach herd immunity… pic.twitter.com/eMEnJxkWYk
2/ And he is not going to propose more lockdowns or widespread boosters. They do want to vaccinate teens but they are getting pushback. From an Icelandic reader (as you can see, the articles back him).
What is so stunning about this is that a couple of weeks ago, as cases began to rise, Iceland looked to be going the opposite way and imposing a new wave of restrictions in the hope of bolstering vaccine effectiveness. Clearly they've recognized that strategy is impossible.
So why did the Iceland epidemiologist walk it back?
That takes us to our next two items.
Why are CDC and its Pawns Always Wrong or Lying?
Beyond the fact that Rochelle Walensky is a Tony Fauci crony from WAY BACK, there is something terribly wrong with CDC.
In my opinion, it is politicized to the point where it obeys some weird agenda that it either does not itself understand, or that it does understand and NUREMBERG II is needed.
Just listen to this front line doctor, who is trained in respiratory viruses and immunology, explain how the agency repeatedly contradicts what is KNOWN and LONG-ESTABLISHED SCIENCE about treating and vaccinating against viral infections. He does NOT mince words. He sees CDC lying, just like I do.
Go to 14:55 to hear him begin, after the initial 15 minutes of the meeting (video MAY start there).
Let me put it this way.
It is important to follow the SCIENCE of PRACTICED MEDICINE and NOT the POLITICS of CDC, or the STOCK VALUE of PFIZER.
This is exactly what I found when “global warming” was forced on the entire scientific community. The “authorities” were repeatedly WRONG, but were never removed from authority for their errors.
Politics does NOT make science work. Politics DESTROYS SCIENCE.
Now – here is where the media comes in.
The Media’s Responsibility
What we have seen is the opposite of the way the media used to function when it was healthy.
The media used to ask tough questions of EVERYBODY – their OWN questions – NOT questions to support today’s talking points of ONE PARTY.
The media was not so obviously driven by AGENDA. The MEDIA did not tell scientists what to think – especially politically preferred science that was either failing or wrong to begin with. The media followed the SCIENCE – and the SCIENCE followed the TRUTH by painful argument and contradictions of its own beliefs.
SCIENCE fought and MEDIA reported.
SCIENCE worked and MEDIA reported.
The media is different now.
The media:
pushes a narrative that is repeatedly WRONG
does not want to pursue certain truths
hounds politicians, experts, authorities, and others who don’t offer approved viewpoints
seems to serve corporate and leftist political interests
The media will have much to answer for, if it KEEPS PUSHING MANDATES for MURDEROUS VACCINES.
So – where does this all go?
Conclusion: Keep It Up, and It’s WAR.
Pushing these vaccines any further is CAUSE FOR WAR for the American People. It’s that simple.
The insane left in America has been fed a real line by RevCom, with their “Bash a Fash” Antifa nonsense, farmed out to leftist youth, and aimed quite absurdly at the normal Americans who overwhelmingly chose Donald Trump against off-the-charts cheating.
The stark TRUTH is that American Bolsheviks of all stripes are pushing and pushing a DYING BRAND, and with the help of this damnable Maoist virus, they have created MEDICAL NAZISM, pushed by a LEFTIST controlled media, and supported by corporate globalists who don’t give a rat’s ass about patients – only about political power, profits, and CONTROL.
It’s one thing to pump a drug like Remdesivir that was basically a loser, but could have been regarded as a “hope-builder” of sorts.
It essentially does nothing but get cash for its makers, but at least it does no harm.
Original Investigation Infectious Diseases
July 15, 2021
Association of Remdesivir Treatment With Survival and Length of Hospital Stay Among US Veterans Hospitalized With COVID-19
Michael E. Ohl, MD, MSPH1,2; Donald R. Miller, ScD3,4; Brian C. Lund, PharmD1; et alTakaaki Kobayashi, MD1,2; Kelly Richardson Miell, PhD1; Brice F. Beck, MA1; Bruce Alexander, PharmD1; Kristina Crothers, MD5,6; Mary S. Vaughan Sarrazin, PhD1,2
Question: Is remdesivir treatment associated with improved survival or shortened hospitalizations among people with COVID-19 in routine care settings?
Findings: In this cohort study of 2344 US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir therapy was not associated with improved 30-day survival but was associated with a significant increase in median time to hospital discharge.
Meaning: The findings suggest that routine use of remdesivir may be associated with increased use of hospital beds but not with improvements in survival.
Abstract
Importance Randomized clinical trials have yielded conflicting results about the effects of remdesivir therapy on survival and length of hospital stay among people with COVID-19.
NOT SO THIS SNAKE-VENOM VACCINE
In my opinion, it is MURDER to try to make anybody take this vaccine involuntarily.
But it gets worse.
Pushing the vaccines drives the China Virus to new levels of pathogenicity. We have been warned repeatedly about this – even by an advisor to Bill Gates’ own pet organization CEPI – and yet it’s full steam ahead.
This is literally unconscionable. It’s not just murder – it’s MASS MURDER.
This is not acceptable.
So I am warning all proponents of mandatory vaccination.
You are headed to literal war, and from there, to only one place.
Nuremberg II.
Please reconsider before it’s too late.
Millions of Americans are ready to do the right thing. AGAIN.
The title is a simple question that I am finding has much power to explain things.
I’m going to leave this a little bit “loose”, so that everybody can “jiggle it into place”.
If I just say “that guy was a crisis actor!” as evidence, or even just “potential evidence”, we get away from the real point, even if it’s TRUE that the guy WAS a “crisis actor”.
Or even more shockingly, WAS NOT.
See what I mean? (Bill Aldenberg was put in charge of Durham’s “spygate” investigations.) Sometimes the TRUTH becomes even more shocking LATER, when we pursue it, leading to MORE TRUTH.
If I say “they’re giving saline injections for [REASON X]”, what if I’m wrong and it’s [REASON Y]? Or what if “saline injections” is as much of a distracting and discrediting psy-op as “magnetic injections”?
Or what if – “AND” LOGIC – it’s BOTH?
BUT – if I “come in from the TOP”, and say this….
What if the reason Democrats and China and Bill Gates and Fauci are “collaborating” on their phony plague to introduce a weird uterus-flushing “vaccine” is actually some kind of “world crisis response” to a problem these people are certain is a world-destroying threat?
(Listen for the “admission”…..)
Stated differently:
What if Democrats don’t just posit and “react” to their phony alleged crises in the open, but also by secret programs that are a lot harder to get rid of, or turn off?
It sure would explain why leftists in government have to keep making these ridiculous public statements about “threats” that absolutely don’t appear to have any validity to normal people – nor even to scientists who are “cut out of the loops” – both the loops of being “informed” AND of being “under control”.
And OH YEAH, there is a lot of POLITICAL ADVANTAGE in doing that, because of CLASSIFICATION automatically providing COVER and a kind of built-in legitimacy by mere existence as a ‘classified’ matter.
You can talk back to a bill moving through Congress. You can’t talk back to a classified program.
That would even apply to the freaking HOAX against Trump. Not to say WHICH HOAX.
In my opinion, the sleazy Democrats HAVE to be doing this. And if CHINA is involved, at the deepest levels, “because it’s a global problem” – well, yeah.
Kind of explains why all the opposition to TRUMP – right?
“OH, NOES! Our classified save-the-world ‘baby’ is gonna END!”
The easiest way to get people to commit ERROR is to convince them that it is for GOOD.
The easiest way to make sure the error STICKS is to make it SECRET FROM THE GIT-GO.
I’m not saying that everybody has the same motivations in a giant project – especially a “secret” project – THEY DON’T.
Some people get into it for MONEY. Some get in for POWER. Some people just GO ALONG. Many people are just excited to be IN ON IT. And some people just want to have some fun.
Some people – and SCIENTISTS routinely fall for this crap – get involved because they’re FLATTERED. They butter up easily, and once they’re in, they don’t like to admit that they made a mistake. That is a big part of how the Chinese “Thousand Talents” program works, to get world scientists to switch their professional allegiance to CHINA.
Now CHINA is very smart, and prefers – like Obama – to “lead from behind”. We make fun of that Obama statement, but it’s actually a power statement to those who understand that Obama is “foolin’ ya” when he says he’s “leading from behind”.
“Leading from behind” works like this.
Posit a problem.
Get somebody else to accept that there is (or even might be) a problem.
Hint toward a solution.
Get somebody else to “come up with” your solution.
Praise them for YOUR solution they think is theirs.
Encourage them to carry out that solution.
Encourage others to find similar solutions.
This is a total euphemism for very sneaky and deceptive leadership. And it IS leadership.
So when China talks about “soft power”, understand that “soft power” is more akin to saying “we’re gonna cut off all avenues of exit”, rather than “we’re gonna be nice about things”.
You starting to see how this works? They love to UNDERSTATE.
Now – there seem to be ways to spot these projects.
leaders make phony political virtue signals to these problems that make no sense to normies
the projects make “committing moves” where people get into potential trouble that makes them double or triple down
“good” people do weird things that seem both stupidly wrong and out of character when they get caught
In my mind, the reason we see these things is that the leftists are ABUSING classification. It’s one thing to hide intelligence or defense matters. It’s quite another to hide some creepy “create gun problems to end gun problems” program.
The beauty of this kind of program is that it is basically “training wheels for conspirators”. You can’t convince most people to take part in a program to spread a virus that creates an avenue to sterilize people – THAT is just “no way”.
But if I came to you, and said “your country needs your skills to help save the world”, would you resist?
Don’t just be afraid of China’s “Thousand Talents” program. Keep an eye out for Obama’s “Million Talents” program. I think it’s there, and I think there are more than just one or two of them.
W
The media controls the science, no matter what scientists think they know.
PS
I want to thank Aubergine for THIS COMMENT which motivated me to “finish” my thoughts on this into a publishable form. You can go to that link to read the full context, but the more general point which Aubergine posited, is to ask if maybe the incidents of people “accidentally” getting “saline injections” instead of the COVID jabs they thought they were getting, might in fact be of a scientific nature.
These “saline jabs” are a real thing – some people getting saline instead of actual COVID jabs. The question is – HOW OFTEN? There have indeed been a few documented instances. Obviously in a huge project, one expects accidents. Forgetting to pump injectable saline into the lyophilized (freeze-dried) vaccine before injection is an understandable error, and should happen accidentally NO MATTER WHAT.
BUT – I have read about TWO instances where nurses who administered saline gave excuses when CAUGHT. In one case, the nurse said they were opposed to the COVID vaccines. Clearly THAT would be malpractice. People are entitled to get the drug they want – even if it’s risky.
In the other case, the nurse said that they had accidentally SPOILED a lot of vaccine, and rather than risk giving the spoiled vaccine, they covered up by administering saline.
I’m not sure I believe that second one, and I’m not even a 100% believer of the first.
Once a person lies, I become suspicious even of their corrected admission. This policy works well for everybody from naughty children to probable Chinese spies.
Deplorable Patriot has posited that the saline jabs are being used to help cover up vaccines that are showing too many side effects. That is not entirely unbelievable. I have an upcoming article on new developments in COVID vaccines, and the way that the tech is developing, leads me to believe that they are moving in ways that will reduce side effects, but (and this is very important) THEY ARE NOT ADMITTING THIS.
Let me repeat that. It’s scientifically obvious that the industry is responding to the dangers of the vaccines, but they are not admitting that this is the motivation for their response.
Yes. The industry is moving toward different vaccine technology that seems likely to have fewer side effects, AND possibly less OVERALL (systemic) immunity. BUT at the same time, that technology will require MORE vaccinations. So it’s SMART if you’re the industry. AND it’s actually smart science.
But the point is, the industry is reacting in the same way that they would be if CDC was secretly instructing “read-in” administration centers to give saline to the riskier patients as a kind of temporary “mid-stream correction” to an overly aggressive vaccine, WITHOUT scaring people away from vaccination, which seems to be a [WRONG-HEADED] “prime directive” at CDC. CDC has already lied to us about people getting the disease after vaccination, when CLEARLY the terrible PCR test is picking up the vaccine itself – which it MUST in theory. And which it does for quite a while, because the vaccine itself turns out to be WAY more persistent than it SHOULD BE – a fact that they HID.
The “COVID after vaccination” thing is not just an obvious lie, when vaccine RNA should set off PCR tests – it is such a fundamental flaw in the protocol, it simply has to be intentional at SOME level in the controlling bureaucracy.
And we KNOW there are people in the controlling bureaucracy, like Rick Bright, who ABUSE their positions based on AGENDA. It turns out that Rick Bright not only sabotaged HCQ – he sabotaged EIDD-2801, a new drug which is orally active, unlike remdesivir. He was so “behind” the vaccines that he threw monkey wrenches into early treatments of all kinds.
Bottom line – CDC can’t be trusted. BUT they seem to be motivated by the left’s morality, which is that “lying is OK, as long as it’s for the good of the listener”. So – the only thing we really need to change to make “saline injections” understandable, and BELIEVABLE, is to give them a positive moral raison d’être used on participants at SOME level.
That is where Aubergine’s idea hit me like lightning. Even if it is not strictly true that they are “studying” people “in the wild” with saline controls, THAT is the exact clinical mentality of a secret project, once it is underway. That is how you COULD get people to do such things.
But then once that morality is on the table, Dep Pat’s idea makes sense, too.
I COULD EVEN ARGUE IT MYSELF FOR THE CDC, PRETENDING TO BE NEUTRON NANCY (“Radium” Rod Rosenstein’s sister, Nancy Messonnier, who just retired, by the way, thank goodness).
“The vaccine is too strong. People will be getting boosters later. They will be getting safer, second-generation vaccines. We can’t increase vaccine hesitancy by admitting the full spike protein is too strong. FOR NOW, for the riskiest patients who want a vaccine but are contraindicated, just give them saline. The numbers of reactions will also fall, and that is a benefit. Remember – vaccine hesitancy is the MOST IMPORTANT THING. It must be avoided at ALL COSTS.”
Of course, if one did this, one might also feel, based on MORALITY, that one would have to recommend continued mask wear, “to do all one could”, lest the “saline-vaccinated” get the ACTUAL disease and expire.
Make sense now? “Positive leftist deception morality” explains quite a bit. One only needs to ask WHICH LEVEL OF COMPROMISE people are “bought in”. Nursing Home Killer is obviously bought in at a higher level – probably “overpopulation” – where “more bodies now” may be necessary to “fix the terrible problem”, rather than just a few “white lies”.
See? This is for their own good! I should get a secret medal from Obama!
*ROLLS EYES*
Yeah. That is where we are now.
Making sense? It does to me. Lies upon lies upon lies upon lies.
“For our own good.”
And made “acceptable” by BLESSED SECRECY.
SO – in my opinion – we may have more luck positing the left’s deceptions as “morally righteous” than “wickedly insidious”.
Although, I will admit, sometimes “wickedly insidious” is more fun.
This is for the historical record. I hope that this analysis gets to the “dissident scientists” involved, but even if it never does, future historians will get a powerful look at what I call “Fake Science” – the establishment’s phony, deceptive and controlled scientific complex – and how infiltration, control, and discreditation of dissident populist scientists was used in this era to keep them in check, protecting controlled science and the interests that keep it controlled – for money, power, and “say” in human destiny.
Even though this story has little or nothing to do with magnetism, I believe this was the beginning of strong discreditation of Judy Mikovits, Sherri Tenpenny, and other “COVID dissident doctors and scientists” who are pursuing the “spike protein and COVID vaccine gynecological problems”. Ultimately, the “coup de grace” was delivered via the phony vaccine magnetism psy-op.
The BIG HIT on this group was the discreditation of Dr. Tenpenny on “vaccine magnetism” – a CIA-constructed sandtrap which I could see coming a mile away, with great horror, as it was placed in front of these “insufficiently skeptical skeptics” – who are skeptical enough to doubt the controlling LIES marbled into mainstream science – but who are blithely unaware of just how evil the establishment really is, in making sure nobody listens to them.
That poor, poor woman. Sounds pretty crazy, doesn’t it? Well, here is the deal. The “establishment science skeptic community” is social, and because it’s a bit lonely in Skepticville, people become tolerant of the crazier stuff, very unlikely to be true, which can easily be fed into the community. Obviously an intelligence agency which knows psychology better than all our universities combined can have a field day with that stuff.
However, before THAT story – which we will get into later – there is THIS story – where I saw these doctors being set up for discreditation on a different topic.
Every time they used the word “suramin” I winced, and this is why.
I will follow this story in roughly chronological order, from my first awareness to today, when I saw the complete picture. However, I may “fast forward” to later knowledge, at times, to put things in context.
When I first saw THIS headline from the SGT Report posted in this site’s open thread (I think it was Duchess, so THANK YOU!), all I could think was “OMG, what a pile of unbelievability THIS is.”
Not only did I think that “vaccine shedding” was preposterous – the idea that it could be fended off somehow with pine needle tea just sounded NUTS.
That was May 10, 2021 – ironically exactly one month ago. I had NO CLUE that one month later – today – I would be convinced that not only is “vaccine shedding” real – Pfizer knew it was a “thing” all along – and long ago.
This is the Pfizer data obtained from the Japanese government.
This is the data up close.
The most important data is simple – the fact that the vaccine is relocating all over the bodies of the test animals – SHOCKINGLY to the ovaries as one of the primary destinations – and the amount of TIME it’s taking to do so. The reason is that the vaccine is encapsulated in lipids – fatty substances – which protect the mRNA, and give it time to get into cells.
Looking at this data, there is no reason to doubt that the vaccine could express in skin lipids, and given that it WAS INDEED expressed in breast milk (full of lipids), killing at least one baby, the EXCRETION of the vaccine at this point makes logical sense.
Thus, when this information got out, the CRITICS were in the catbird seat, and the INDUSTRY which oddly tolerated these results, was in trouble.
How does one flip that around? DISCREDIT THE CRITICS.
Now I did not realize at the time that THAT was what was going on with “pine needle tea”. I thought this was just the usual stuff that pops up routinely in the “natural health” world. However, a closer look at the article surprised me.
There appeared to be a chemical error, and it appeared to be Dr. Judy Mikovits making that error. But it’s not her making the error.
Here are two paragraphs of interest:
There is a potential antidote to the current spike protein contagion which is called Suramin. It’s found in many forests around the world, in Pine needles. Suramin has inhibitory effects against components of the coagulation cascade and against the inappropriate replication and modification of RNA and DNA. Excessive coagulation causes blood clots, mini-clots, strokes, and unusually heavy menstrual cycles.
Dr. Judy Mikovits asserts that globalists are well aware that pine needle tea is the answer to covid depopulation weapons, and they are secretly using pine needle tea to protect themselves from the very plague they have unleashed upon the world, Mikovitz explains.
I do disagree with a portion of Mikovits’ beliefs, but not everything. She really changed my whole view of “gain of function” – she sees very deeply into the problems of “Faucism”, shall we say. One thing she is NOT is stupid. So when I read that second paragraph, I simply didn’t believe it. It’s complete crap. “Pine Needle Tea vs. The Globalists”. Yeah, great movie! And kind of ironic that one would use a NATURAL ABORTIFACIENT to face off with “depopulationists”, but we’ll save that bit of “oy vey” for later analysis.
Well, deeper digging showed me where this came from. ANOTHER person who I usually trust, up to a point – Mike Adams of Natural News. From the day BEFORE – May 9.
Mike Adams is actually a pretty decent scientist, although he does allow guests on his show to wander off into clickbait generalities, far-fetched speculations, and utopian (or dystopian) characterizations. It’s just edgy stuff. Typical “natural remedies” world. I still buy the rational and reasoned parts of it – it’s just “old science”. And on the basic FACTS coming out of labs, Mike Adams doesn’t present “fake data”. He waits like a buzzard for REAL DATA that looks good for “naturalism” and then plays “AHA! LOOK AT THIS!” with mainstream medicine. It’s a “schtick”, but it’s a pretty good one.
Anyway, the wording is identical – SGT Report was just copying and mirroring Natural News, as they often do.
I saw at the time that Mike Adams had just picked this information up from some naturals blogger, and had copied it verbatim.
Now – beyond the nonsensical attribution to Mikovits, there are actually TWO big chemistry problems with this article that Mike is citing.
One is on the idea that shikimic acid – the desired ingredient in pine needles – IS Tamiflu.
Quoted in the story:
Researchers at the University of Maine at Orono say they’ve found a new and relatively easy way to extract shikimic acid — a key ingredient in the drug Tamiflu — from pine tree needles.
That’s not exactly true. Shikimic acid is NOT Tamiflu, nor is it an ingredient in Tamiflu. Now, a more accurate statement is also given:
Shikimic acid derivatives have also been shown to exhibit useful biological activity. Most notably, the well-known antiviral drug oseltamivir (Tamiflu), which acts as a viral neuraminidase inhibitor, is used to treat seasonal influenza and has been deployed during H1N1 influenza outbreaks.
YES. A derivative. Tamiflu is RELATED to shikimic acid, but it is a distinctly different molecule. Shikimic acid can be used to MAKE Tamiflu. But it is a building block – not the same thing.
All that said, shikimic acid, whether from star anise or from pine needles, is indeed antiviral in some contexts, and antiinflammatory in others. So, YES, pine needles are an actual curative thing. More than just containing an exotic natural acid, they were the equivalent of citrus fruit for North American Indians.
Indeed, pine needle tea can be used to treat scurvy, and it’s BETTER than just vitamin C (which it contains in vast amounts), because it also contains flavonoids which are curative for vascular symptoms of scurvy.
However, you have to pick the right pine needles – some are poisonous, and even the good ones can INDUCE ABORTION.
The part about inducing abortion is VERY critical. That would be very problematic for these doctor critics of the spike protein vaccines, if they were in fact advocating “a different abortifacient instead”.
See how that works?
That is – how do we say this? – ah, yes – discreditation.
Now, at the TIME, I just thought to myself “Wow – how unfortunate that these people who are going after the ‘abortion vaccine’ are advising people to take an abortifacient.”
And I’m not the only person who observed this. It turns out that the original blog article was edited a number of times, to ADD warning information about the potential abortifacient risks of pine needle teas. The information was not there originally. It looks to me like blog commenters (comments are invited but hidden) likely cautioned the author about the problem.
Yeah, let’s just give THAT the “jaundiced editorial eye” that Maria does so well.
ANYWAY, on to the OTHER chemical mistake – SURAMIN.
This is actually rather cute, and the wicked industry that just savaged Dr. Tenpenny is going to get a little karma here.
As you will see, shortly, part of the “discred” here is also for suramin itself – because it’s a potential and very legitimate “HCQ” or “ivermectin” – a readily available treatment. I didn’t realize this at the time.
I will explain that more fully in a moment.
Suramin is a synthetic drug – it’s not a natural product. Many of us can tell just by looking at the structure.
And NO, this stuff is NOT in pine needles. Anybody who says this is INSTABLOCKED in SCIENCEVILLE.
Suramin is a killer of parasites – it’s used to cure sleeping sickness and river blindness in Africa. It’s actually a well-known, long-term, old drug. Indeed, it’s a lot like hydroxychloroquine, being on that WHO list of essential medicines.
Aubergine, our local naturals expert, quickly spotted that this was a synthetic drug and very unlikely to be in pine needles. I confirmed her suspicions, but I didn’t really dig into WHY this error had been made in the article – until today, when I saw it from a discreditation angle.
First of all – to my surprise – there is some real science behind suramin as a treatment for COVID-19.
The following is from a very solid source that monitors new medical developments in the scientific literature.
Here we report the discovery of suramin, a 100-year-old drug, as a potent inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) through blocking the binding of RNA to the enzyme. In biochemical assays, suramin and its derivatives are at least 20-fold more potent than remdesivir, the currently approved nucleotide drug for COVID-19. The 2.6 Å cryo-EM structure of the viral RdRp bound to suramin reveals two binding sites of suramin, with one site directly blocking the binding of the RNA template strand and the other site clash with the RNA primer strand near the RdRp catalytic active site, therefore inhibiting the viral RNA replication. Furthermore, suramin potently inhibits SARS-CoV-2 duplication in Vero E6 cells.
Better than Remdesivir? AWWWWW. Where did we hear THAT before?
OH, I REMEMBER! It was some drug called “hydroxychloroquine”!
So what you are seeing here, is that ANOTHER old antiparasitic drug looked to be BETTER THAN REMDESIVIR as an antiviral. Why, that would almost be THREE FOR THREE. Were it not nipped in the bud.
So indeed, Dr. Judy Mikovits had spotted that suramin was a useful drug for COVID. She had prior knowledge that it has been trialed as a treatment for AUTISM, and that, also, with some surprising success.
Now – here is where it gets really interesting.
THIS video was cited in the “pine needle tea” blog post. It is HIGHLY edited. Just listen. The MUSIC is absolutely CRINGEVILLE.
https://youtu.be/JYHrmmmoX30
NOTE ADDED LATER (June 14, 2022)
You will note that the video is now just a link.
Here is an EARLIER screenshot from right after the video went down – which was basically a day after I published.
Note that it was NOT removed by YouTube – it was removed by the uploader at that time.
Here is a screenshot from the video when it was up.
This Academy of Divine Knowledge (June 14, 2022 discussion HERE) seems tied to many of the luminaries of the “discredited dirty dozen” – but IMO it may very well be part of the discreditation of them.
It’s too bad the video is down – you cannot see the skillful editing. Basically, an earlier video of Mikovits which was “good science” was recast by editing to create a point of division on falsehood, rather that a unification on truth.
As I was saying (before this note was added)……
This is a beautiful editing job which accomplishes two things:
(1) makes Mikovits look authoritative to people in the new age end of the natural remedies world ($$$$$)
(2) makes Mikovits look utterly discredited in the scientific world (?????)
One would not know, from this video, ANYTHING about the idea that suramin is turning out to be ANOTHER potential HCQ, safer and better than remdesivir.
But yet this video is “helping” her, and I seriously doubt she realizes just how undermining it is.
This is how discred works. Very often, the subject has NO IDEA. They may see the discrediting actions as not just neutral, but well-intended. But outside the understanding of the target, discred keeps things DIVIDED. Serious people are not going to take Mikovits seriously. Suramin will look like one more fish tank cleaner. Remdesivir (very likely on the cutting room floor for that video) won’t be threatened.
It’s so SLICK.
But THAT is not the best part. When suramin is FALSELY linked to pine needle tea, and the CHUMPS – the MARKS – are tricked into saying it – everything falls apart.
Mikovits’ advocacy of suramin as another potential HCQ / ivermectin looks loony
The Chinese chump scientists’ very legitimate work on suramin, but threatening remdesivir, gets memory-holed
Any doctors who pick up and repeat the error about suramin and pine needle tea are tainted by the error
The chump docs are now ready for the coup de grace – the phony magnetic vaccine psy-op
I hope you now see WHY these small errors matter – and why “opposition research” is a THING not only in politics, but in the highly politicized science, under which we now suffer.
I think these good doctors were SET UP.
I think that THIS:
…..was the DESIRED OUTCOME OF THIS:
“Dissident” doctors and scientists need to be more careful. We are up against very EVIL people.
Wherein we examine, in something like “MythBusters” style, the dubious “Magnet Challenge”, without relying (too much) on the anti-scientific crutch of scientific authority
First, a confession.
The main reason I am attracted to these videos of people sticking magnets to the COVID vaccination injection sites on their shoulders, is that I love to watch normal people doing science – EVEN IF they are doing it badly, or just plain wrong.
Second, another confession.
I have a more personal reason for liking these videos. I know exactly what it’s like – as a scientist – to look for a tiny magnetic effect with substandard equipment. To me, that is the essence of science – because our equipment is rarely good enough. It could always be better. Somebody ELSE always gets the Large Hadron Collider “LARGE EURO PROVIDER” – while most of us schmoe scientists finagle “not enough time” on somebody else’s cheap and tiny second-hand machine.
And the problem with magnetism is that some of the effects we are looking for are REALLY TINY. The entire UNIVERSE seems to conspire against finding them. So when I see these people with their refrigerator magnets, trying to come up with a definitive answer to a strange and even downright stupid, but wonderful question – “does the COVID vaccine have something magnetic in it?” – against the combined opposition of media, government, and the chumped “fake science” I used to be part of – well, I’m sorry. I am going to root for the underdogs, even though these people are almost universally doing marginal, problematic, or even face-palmy science.
At the very least, they ARE doing science. And SOME of them are doing what I would almost call admirable “kitchen science”.
Most people – and that can include me – will quickly look for an “authoritative ruling” on a scientific question. Yes, that’s GREAT – but it’s not SCIENCE. It’s “armchair science” – pretty much like armchair anything. There is very little skin in the game – no pun intended. But God bless anybody who says “Hey! Let me see if *I* can figure this out for myself!”
Skin in the game. HELL YEAH.
Indeed, I remember the last time I did some kitchen science – and discovered that – despite the LIES of PBS propagandists – masks were robbing me of oxygen and reducing cognition – MEASURABLY.
TL;DR – skip down to “Crucial Experiment” and read how you can prove to yourself that masks cause real and measurable cognitive decline that lasts long after you unmask. NPR and other leftists who say masks don’t affect you and your children are LYING. LOOK, it’s time to be blunt. Senility – Cognitive Decline – …
SO – what I want to do here – is to follow the “Mythbusters” model – a GREAT pathway into science – and “firm up” the “Magnet Challenge”.
I don’t want to decry it. I don’t want to “debunk” it. I want to make it rigorous, so that we can prove TO OURSELVES whether or not (1) people are getting vaccines which have some kind of “magnetic” component (we’ll firm that idea up), and, no matter what, (2) whether such a thing is scientifically possible based upon known science.
Does that sound fair? Does that sound even-handed?
I’m very open to this weird idea of magnetic vaccines – real or hoax. I would love to find out, one way or another, the answers to these to questions – yes or no. I take as much joy in killing theories, as I do in confirming them. And on the way there, when one side starts winning – “brake” or “accelerator” – I instinctively look for the other one to “challenge” what seems to be winning.
This is how the SCULPTURE of “working theory” emerges from the STONE OF TRUTH. Even if, as may be the case here – that sculpture could be a bit of a Fauci bobble-head.
The Plan
We’re going to do this in several parts. This FIRST ARTICLE will concentrate on the Magnet Challenge itself.
FIRST – we look at the Magnet Challenge as has been seen in videos, and figure out (as you will see) what parts are obviously WRONG.
SECOND – we look at MAGNETISM ITSELF – to get some background on what we need to know to FIX the Magnet Challenge. We want to be comfortable with magnetism before we get down to business.
THIRD – we look at how the Magnet Challenge might actually be fixed. We will only get part-way into that.
In the SECOND ARTICLE, coming in a week or two, we look at “making it real” – and ask a crucial question. Are “magnetic vaccines” even possible? And bigger still – are there ANY “magnetic injections” that people with an agenda might try to implement?
You will be shocked.
Magnetism – which is a bit like the kid sister of electricity – is very much like one of the young female characters in a modern “X Men” saga. She’s under-rated and under-appreciated – until she saves everybody’s ass. I personally think magnetism is beautiful – almost to the point of prejudice. Yeah, if somebody finds convincing evidence of a SORDID, wart-like, unbecoming, magnetic monopole, I will let it convince me. But until then, as far as I’m concerned, the magnetic monopole is sacrilege on the order of gay Jesus porn movies where THE VIRGIN AIN’T. Ugly, wrong, and needless. GROW UP!
Now – I’m not going to get into the theory of magnetism itself, because that is quite unnecessary for the task at hand. Steve is doing a marvelous job explaining (1) mass, force and gravitation, (2) velocity and momentum, (3) energy and potential, and (4) introductory electromagnetism. What I’m doing here is leafing off all of that in a very shallow way, into the magnetism of materials – just a wee bit – so that we can look more critically at how to do science honestly.
We are going to see if – just using GOOD kitchen science – we can figure out how to make BAD kitchen science be a thing of the past.
To quote my new favorite video…..
“Don’t reboot it – just patch!”
Magnet Challenge Videos: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
THE BAD
The FIRST “Magnet Challenge” video that I saw was one of the best examples of “bad science” that I have seen in a long time. “Spock wept”, to put it bluntly.
This is the one where the black-masked, “zaftig”, blonde woman appears to be at home in front of her big-screen television set, having just gotten the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, and “tries” to stick a magnet to both shoulders – first the shoulder in which she got the injection, then the other.
It’s very hard to find this or other videos now, because anti-science, pro-authoritarian, Menshevik Soviet diaper-CEO YouTube has hidden most of them. Even Rumble seems to have hidden most of their Magnet Challenge videos. I did find a source video that includes footage from the original, but I’m saving most of that for below. You will see the video in its entirety then.
Instead, here are some stills. First, the lady showing off the vaccinated arm, with the magnet sticking to the injection site.
Next, the other arm, right before she lets go, and the magnet falls off.
It is immediately obvious to anybody with ANY exposure to science that this woman does NOT, in fact, perform this test in an “equal” way on her two arms. Now I’m not saying that she didn’t observe some difference – that the magnet didn’t behave differently between the two shoulders. What I’m saying is that she didn’t give the shoulders an “equal chance” to either stick or fail.
Is it deception? Is it self-deception? We don’t need to know yet. All we need to know, is that it’s not science.
There is a LIST of differences that can be seen in the video.
To begin with, the lady’s vax arm is held at an outward angle, though toward the camera, making the relaxed angle hard to see. In contrast, her non-vax arm is held in tightly and more nearly vertical at the shoulder, with her forearm across her abdomen.
Next, you can see in the second picture above, that she depresses the “non-vax” magnet with her index finger, guaranteeing that there will be a spring force when she releases it – and yes there is, as she very quickly pulls her finger away, and the magnet flies off.
In contrast, she “babies the magnet” on the vax side, gently holding it up with the middles of several fingers, NOT at the tips, and moving it around AND pressing it lightly and repeatedly for several seconds until it takes hold and STAYS. When it finally sticks to her satisfaction, she lets go gingerly.
This is where I want to STOP THE FILM and talk about how minor of an effect she is presumably looking for. You can literally see how TINY it is by the fact that she’s “babying the magnet” on a shoulder that is less than vertical.
What she is doing is trying to demonstrate an opposition of at least 3 forces:
possible minor magnetism
guaranteed reliable gravity
variable “surface forces”
We all understand that “smooth objects may stick temporarily to skin” – right? Every child who has played around in the bathtub realizes that even a bit of moisture can increase this effect, too. I am not going to get into what those surface forces may be, although they are, down deep, “minor electrostatic” in nature.
“Things stick to things”, shall we just say. Not much, always, but quite a bit, sometimes.
Given this fairly large “minor” effect, plus the reliable effect of gravity that varies with angle, we are not being honest if we FAVOR or DISFAVOR either of those effects – gravity or surface attractions – and also spring forces – on one arm versus the other, while using a metric of “falls off or doesn’t fall off”.
She did NOT give it a fair test.
Now – before we go arguing about whether or not there could STILL BE a real effect here, despite her clear BIAS toward “magnetic vaccination”, let’s look at some AWESOME kitchen science.
This kitchen science does NOT disprove magnetic vaccinations. What it DOES do is disprove the simplest forms of the Magnet Challenge as being sufficient to prove magnetic vaccination. It is a subtle point, but one that we must keep in mind if we’re being honest and unbiased.
This brilliant “disproof” of the sufficiency of the “Magnet Challenge”, very ironically, was being BLOCKED by the “Brave” browser. While they stopped censoring THIS video, I’m uncertain if they’re still censoring others.
Not only am I incredibly disappointed in the obvious censorship by Brave – I’m delighted to have in hand an example of why censorship of people TRYING to find the truth is always wrong.
I *delight* in using error to show truth – it’s one of THE BEST WAYS to make people smarter. And yet, the CEOs of Brave and YouTube – obviously intelligent people – engage in such censorship. This is what socialism does. People may not think they’re socialists, but they will carry socialist memes like pack animals – as fervently and reliably as if they were committed socialists. Even “anti-socialists” do this, when they behave as controlled opposition.
Here is the video – maybe it will work with your browser. Like I said, it’s working with Brave now.
Now, I’ve included that embed code just on the off chance that your browser will show the video, but if not, then first, here is a picture of Brave blocking the video…..
Now – let’s look at two stills from the video.
First, we see where a guy has “stuck” a key to a place on his arm that is almost certainly unvaccinated – just above the inside of his wrist.
This is all quite brilliant for multiple reasons. He shows the key, and it is a familiar, cheap, non-steel, light metal, probably mostly zinc or aluminum alloy, key. These are never attracted to a magnet, nor can they be magnetized. They ARE light enough to demonstrate surface forces as being comparable to gravity. Best of all, by using a KEY, which will tend to “torque off” if the key is not pointing “down with gravity”, he can show to some extent the direction “down” in the video,
As seen in the video, surface forces are comparable to gravity. This means that if we state, for the vertical axis (think about Steve’s lessons here), that…..
MF + SF >= GF
[magnetic forces plus surface forces UP must be greater than or equal to gravitational forces DOWN]
…..as a condition of testing for the presence of magnetic forces, then we have just shown that this method cannot be used to show the presence or absence of magnetic forces.
SURFACE FORCES ALONE CAN ACCOUNT FOR RESISTANCE TO A FALL.
And it gets better.
Yes. He actually takes it past vertical – demonstrating that the surface forces are SO STRONG that they can resist a certain amount of “peeling force” by gravity.
Thus, we are DONE.
The Magnet Challenge is NOT sufficient to tell us if people got a “magnetic vaccination”.
THE EXPERIMENT MUST BE MODIFIED OR REPLACED.
And YES – we will get to that in a minute. But first…..
THE UGLY (YET BEAUTIFUL)
Remember that I found a stashed version of the first video of the blonde lady on Bitchute? That bigger stashing video was actually an episode of Del Bigtree’s The Highwire show, with host Jefferey Jaxen, and reporter Carmen Estel of “Mom on the Street”.
In addition to Jefferey providing a good short compilation of some of the prior videos, Carmen actually wandered out onto Laguna Beach and tested a variety of young people. She got 15 people who had gotten vaccines to try the magnet test on their injection site. Out of 15 people, for 6 the magnet “stuck” and for 9 it “did not”.
Go ahead and watch – see what you think.
It was ALMOST good science – but not quite. The attempt was beautiful, but it was still a bit ugly.
The one thing that would have made this experiment actually meaningful, would have been to do a CONTROL EXPERIMENT on the NON-VACCINATED ARM of each participant.
This would NOT have made the experiment perfect, or even good – it would have made it BETTER.
And THAT is where we need to go next. How could we test for a “magnetic vaccine” using “kitchen science” if we really wanted to “do it right”?
Let’s go MYTHBUSTERS.
MythBusting Magnetism and The Human Body
MythBusters is a fascinating part of “Fake Entertainment” that looks at “urban legends and myths” and tries to see if (1) the legends and myths are true, and (2) if not, can the legends and myths be MADE TO BECOME TRUE by “improving” the myth, using better, smarter, or more modern technology.
MythBusters is still a part of “fake science” – mostly by omission. The MythBusters team is not allowed to pursue certain topics or answers, due to pressure by government, industry or activist groups.
Don’t believe me? Try this.
Thus, certain myths are allowed to be debunked, but others are maintained by omission. Most of all, TRUE “myths” are kept in “myth status” by not allowing them to be examined. This is a key part of “fake science”.
Nevertheless, MythBusters does wonders for science. Most of all, the show promotes the true scientific foundation of free and honest inquiry by “normal people”. And while THEY cannot pursue everything, WE (almost) CAN.
We will begin OUR “mythbusting” of vaccine magnetism with even greater freedom than MythBusters, because we will pursue truth regardless of the desires of government, industry, and activist groups.
Let’s start with MRI – Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
One of the most important things you can realize about strong magnetic fields, like those in an MRI machine, is that their danger profiles for metal objects VARY with the SIZE, the COMPOSITION, the SHAPE, and the PLACEMENT of the metal objects.
BIG iron and steel objects like oxygen tanks and floor polishers are extremely dangerous, because they have a lot of IRON and a lot of weight. The forces produced upon them by a strong magnetic field are tremendous. A human being holding onto the object, or in the way of it, is in great danger.
Intermediate sized objects – especially guns – pose intermediate dangers. They tend to get yanked from holsters and fly against the machines, where they can’t be removed until the machine is turned off.
Smaller FREE objects can become missiles, by the field doing WORK on them, to accelerate them to dangerous velocities.
https://youtu.be/ug3e9W5H0jI
You see that title – “WHY ABSOLUTELY NO METAL SHOULD ENTER AN MRI ROOM”? Well, I’m here to tell you, it’s not true. MRI technicians DO let metal into MRI rooms – they are just VERY CAREFUL about what metal goes in and comes out. You will see.
In fact, on the other end of the spectrum, a small implanted metal object – depending upon the SHAPE and LOCATION in the body – may not be dangerous at all. This is why MRI techs ask very detailed questions about possible internal metal objects.
Thus, when “Mythbusters Kari” was injected with an RFID tag containing a ferrite-core antenna, and was stuck into an MRI machine, the tag was NOT heated up, nor was it ripped out of her. In fact, she didn’t notice anything.
This is because the ferrite in the antenna is smaller than a grain of rice, and it is located inside a strong object, located in a structurally strong part of the human body. The total magnetic force on the object, even under a huge magnetic field, is miniscule compared to the weight of a human arm or leg, or to the strength of human skin, flesh, and bone. The small object is happy to remain exactly where it is, without pain or injury.
Even older pacemakers can be happy in older MRI machines, when run properly.
I was surprised to learn, when I got an MRI, that I could NOT wear a necklace, but I could wear my wedding ring, regardless of material. If you think about it, this makes sense. One object (the wedding ring) was slightly outside the machine – the other (the necklace) would not have been. One object (the wedding ring) was firmly held in place by a heavy body part which normally withstands strong forces – the other was not. One object (the necklace) had the potential to fly around and break or tear under the field – the other did not.
Note that both the MRI machine itself AND the little ferrite-core antenna illustrate an important yet very simple principle of magnetism – the idea that “bringing lots of little magnets together” creates a stronger and stronger field. That works in reverse, too. Break the magnet apart, into separate smaller magnets, and the field of each gets weaker and weaker.
The implications here are simple, and are directly related to the experience of MythBuster Kari, who had a SINGLE UNIFIED magnetizable body placed within her. One little “big” magnet.
A REAL “magnetic vaccine” is going to experience no more force than an RFID with a ferrite core antenna, in terms of reacting to a larger magnetic field. Nobody who got a COVID vaccine, even if it was chock full of iron or ferrite nanoparticles, is going to experience anything “ripping out of them” in an MRI – much less next to a rare earth refrigerator magnet. The real question is whether EITHER a real magnetic vaccine or a small magnet placed next to it would experience any visible force AT ALL.
Thus we KNOW that we should expect a VERY SMALL FORCE IF ANY, from ANY type of “magnetic” vaccine. It’s not going to be “magnetically dangerous”.
Yes – a steel razor blade embedded next to one’s aorta might be one thing under an MRI. But small, blunt, magnetizable implants, located in “safe” places where they are strongly supported, are not going to be trouble.
This means that if we are dealing with a SMALL PERMANENT MAGNET – even a small but powerful rare earth magnet – instead of the MRI machine, we are not going to expect a HUGE reaction with any kind of metal under somebody’s skin, or bigger still, if it’s deep in their arm muscle.
And further still – if it is a SMALL effect, we need to start asking EXACTLY HOW SMALL? Is it even going to be visible?
AH – now we’re ready to do REAL SCIENCE. More or less. We will start off with some background, and then get increasingly into “kitchen physics”.
Real Fieldwives of Magnetism
You may not realize it, but pretty much everything reacts to a magnetic field. Most people are only familiar with what reacts VISIBLY to a magnetic field – that being certain objects containing iron, as well as those containing a few less common elements with similar “ferromagnetic” properties
But the truth is, anything with charged parts somewhere in it, on it, or around it, can react with a magnetic field – and EVEN the lowly, fundamental, neutral neutrino, MAY interact with magnetism, by non-standard mechanisms – making the potential magnetic properties of neutrinos a field of study – and (IMO) much more likely to be real, than the horrid chimera of broken theory known as the magnetic monopole.
I don’t want to get too deeply into the kinds of ways that matter responds to magnetic fields, because one really can’t do it without leaning heavily on more obscure aspects of quantum mechanics, but several classifications of response are very useful in understanding what is going on.
Ferromagnetism – is the familiar response of IRON, many types of steel, adjacent metals cobalt and nickel, and other substances like magnetite (lodestone) or chromium dioxide, which can be MAGNETIZED to some degree. These are substances which REALLY LIKE to be in a magnetic field, and to even form permanent magnets themselves.
Paramagnetism – is the property of many elements and substances which have what are called “unpaired electrons”. It is in the same direction as ferromagnetism – meaning such things LIKE to be in a magnetic field. However, paramagnetism is MUCH weaker than ferromagnetism. In fact, it is very difficult to measure, sometimes, because TINY ferromagnetic impurities and contaminants can and will throw off measurements of paramagnetic substances.
Diamagnetism – is the property of things with fully “paired” electrons. It is the “default” magnetism of most things in this world. It is generally extremely weak, and it OPPOSES a magnetic field. Thus, diamagnetic substances want to LEAVE a magnetic field. They repel either end of a magnet – although weakly. Diamagnetism is also difficult to measure properly because of ferromagnetic and paramagnetic impurities.
Now – I want to take a small DETOUR into diamagnetism.
Visible Diamagnetism
Except for a few geeks here, most of you have probably never seen visible diamagnetism before. You could even call it “anti-magnetism”. The reason most have never seen it, is not only because it is weak, but also because unlike common visible [ferro]magnetism, which only needs one common element – IRON – simple visible diamagnetism with objects requires MORE – in most cases THREE more elements. In what follows, we will be seeing very powerful iron-boron-neodymium magnets being repelled by bismuth and graphite – two substances with so much diamagnetism, it can become easily visible.
Here is a beautifully simple demonstration of how water – which is weakly diamagnetic – is repelled by a magnetic field – in this case provided by a strong, modern, permanent Nd-Fe-B magnet.
There are very cool videos of something called diamagnetic levitation. Sometimes these are actually demonstrations of “diamagnetic repulsion being used to stabilize magnetic levitation“. There is a difference, and I want you to understand it. I find that understanding the differences HELPS to understand magnetic effects in general – both diamagnetism and paramagnetism/ferromagnetism.
Here is a table-top demonstration of PURE diamagnetic levitation.
This is a diamagnetic substance – the graphite in an ordinary pencil lead – being pulled down by gravity into a strong magnetic field generated by powerful diametrically magnetized permanent magnets. As the graphite is pulled down, the diamagnetic response of the material increases until it balances gravity. This is simple, pure, diamagnetic repulsion from a magnetic field.
Now, let’s see what one can do with that in a laboratory.
Yes. That frog experiment led to an IgNobel Prize, but the same investigator later got a Nobel Prize for his investigation of a diamagnetic champion – graphite – which he was able to reliably study as 1-layer-thick graphene – which substance is changing the world.
Better yet, this frog experiment is explained as part of a VERY nice explanation of the different kinds of magnetism:
Now – there are also some great pictures and videos of diamagnetic substances “floating” above strong ferromagnets.
Here is a video of it – again – pure diamagnetic levitation – resistance to falling into a magnetic field.
There are other much cooler pictures, however, that are NOT ALWAYS pure diamagnetic levitation. The following three pictures show permanent magnets floating above highly diamagnetic “pyrolytic graphite”. These pictures MAY BE somewhat pure diamagnetic levitation, but it is likely that they are using a “lifter magnet” somewhere above the picture – not only to lift the floating magnet to some extent, but to help stabilize it from moving off the center of the diamagnetic surface.
To understand that physics, go HERE, to the video below, for a great amateur demonstration.
What you will see is diamagnetic repulsion being used to stabilize magnetic levitation.
What this apparatus does is create a little energetic valley between the bismuth poles. Magnetic levitation wants to pull the little magnet up to the bigger magnet above – but diamagnetic repulsion fights against both gravity going DOWN and the magnetic attraction going UP. At just the right amounts (a small range) of magnetic force UP, everything balances in stable levitation.
It’s not as easy to SEE the diamagnetic repulsion / levitation in this case, but again, there are three forces involved – gravity, magnetic attraction, and diamagnetic repulsion.
In the pencil lead demonstration, gravity forces the diamagnetic substance down into the magnetic field until the opposing diamagnetic repulsion balances gravity, creating stable levitation. Similarly for the graphite disk floating over the array of cube magnets.
In this last demonstration, that same sort of repulsion, in reverse, happens at the bottom bismuth plate, but to get better “lift”, the floating magnet is both lightened and center-stabilized by a lifter magnet. A SECOND bismuth plate keeps the floating magnet from going UP to the lifter magnet.
Though if you hanker for the beautiful simplicity of PURE diamagnetic levitation, click this link for 2 awesome videos and 5 images.
NOW – back to REAL LIFE and the question of “magnetic vaccines” – but passing through MORE considerations of different “magnetic” substances.
Visible Paramagnetism
Most “refrigerator magnets” available until recently have been ferrites – which are ferromagnetic ceramics similar to magnetite (lodestone). They are fairly strong ferromagnets, but nothing extraordinary. However, more and more, refrigerator magnets are now neodymium-iron-boron, a.k.a. neodymium magnets. Those are the little, very powerful magnets.
In the above photo, bigger and stronger neodymium magnets are being used to ATTRACT copper (II) sulfate (a.k.a. cupric sulfate) on a balance beam, turning the beam TOWARD the magnet, because cupric sulfate is net PARAMAGNETIC. On the other hand, the same magnets will REPEL the bismuth, which is net DIAMAGNETIC, and make the balance beam rotate AWAY from the magnets. Note that the coinage metals – copper, silver and gold – are all diamagnetic, although less so than bismuth. However, many other metals, if not ferromagnetic, are still paramagnetic. Aluminum, for example, is paramagnetic.
I will show you a great video of the above experiment in just a moment. But before that, I want to encourage YOU to do some science.
Do you have any of those really strong little magnets? (CHECK #1)
Do you have any bismuth bird shot? (CHECK #2D)
Do you have any pencil leads? (CHECK #2D)
Do you have any iron supplements in capsules or pill form? (CHECK #2P)
Do you have any copper sulfate crystals (root killer granules)? (CHECK #2P)
Do you have any magnesium or calcium supplements? (CHECK #2d)
Do you have any multivitamins with or without iron? (CHECK #2dp)
If you answered YES to question 1 and any of questions 2 with CAPITAL LETTERS, then you can actually do the same experiment on your kitchen counter, without a fancy apparatus. What you are doing IS an experiment just like the Magnet Challenge, only you are READY for very small effects, and have SOME IDEA of what a positive or negative result will look like. Questions 2 with small letters are going to be control experiments.
First of all, be careful with the iron supplements and the copper sulfate. Both are mildly poisonous! Keep iron supplements away from kids, especially. Please handle copper sulfate carefully, too. Avoid touching the crystals, and wash your hands or anything that touches it.
What I simply want you to do is to very carefully and gently “dog” each of these things – pills, capsules, crystals, pencil lead, bismuth bird shot – on a FLAT, SMOOTH, LOW-FRICTION SURFACE – like a clean kitchen counter-top or glass range – with a neodymium magnet. Bring the magnet close – closer – closer still – and see what happens.
SPOILER: I will discuss the results below. Do the experiment now, or after the video below.
Here is the GREAT video that shows you what forces to expect.
SPOILER – are you ready?
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
You should see some attractive motion with the iron supplements and the copper sulfate crystals. NOT MUCH, but enough to realize that YES – paramagnetism is REAL, and careful kitchen science will reveal it. And if your magnets are strong enough, you may even see repulsive diamagnetism from the bismuth and the pencil lead.
You will most likely NOT see any motion of the controls – the magnesium or calcium supplements, or the multivitamins. All of these will be mostly diamagnetic, although it is possible that the iron-containing multivitamin may be weakly paramagnetic overall. I could not get mine to budge.
Can you think of any other things you could test? Metal salts are likely to be either invisibly diamagnetic or visibly paramagnetic. Metals themselves are likely to be paramagnetic, although some are diamagnetic. Certain ROCKS are actually ferromagnetic – notably jasper and serpentine – due to the presence of ferromagnetic iron oxides. They will be strongly drawn to a magnet.
You can always TEST things and then look up the magnetic susceptibility of whatever you just tested on the internet. This will prevent any BIAS from creeping in.
Now – where does this leave us?
Well, we’ve seen what these small but powerful magnets do with diamagnetic and paramagnetic substances, and it’s NOT MUCH.
What about ferromagnetic substances?
Visible Transdermal Ferromagnetism
We are now starting to get very close, conceptually, to the “Magnet Challenge”. We are getting used to the idea of very weak forces, and the difficulties in detecting them – particularly with CRAPPY EQUIPMENT.
If you are already thinking “What I saw with iron supplements – barely rolling or sliding on a countertop when a strong magnet got really close – no WAY would I be able to see THAT little force moving a much heavier MAGNET on somebody’s shoulder”, then you are now beginning to realize that the Magnet Challenge is being challenged. But it’s still not disproven by any means. Because NOW we will bring in ferromagnetism – which is much stronger than paramagnetism.
Watch THIS video to begin to see forces that COULD not only move, but maybe even hold up a magnet.
Note that this guy’s implanted magnet is UNDER THE SKIN – not deep in muscle. That would make a HUGE difference in terms of any magnetic test. We can’t be definitive about the “Magnet Challenge” at this point, because we don’t know the strength of the fields from the test magnets, the types of magnetic substance allegedly deposited, or the depth, but we DO know that the depth matters – a LOT.
Now – the first thing that probably surprised you is that he found that much “iron” in sand. That iron is not IRON METAL per se – or at least not much of it is metal. It is mostly RUST (Fe2O3) and MAGNETITE (Fe3O4). If you’ve ever panned for gold, then you know that sand of all kinds contains a LOT of “black sand” – magnetite – and THAT is probably most of what he had on his finger in the video.
Magnetite – like lodestone – is an example – a NATURAL example – of a ferrite – a mineral or ceramic metal oxide where the metal is mostly or completely IRON.
SO – we can now begin to think that IF a vaccine deposited a FERROMAGNETIC substance – IN ENOUGH QUANTITY – and close enough to the skin – then MAYBE it could visibly affect a magnet brought close to the skin.
Now – before I got “geeky” on this, I simply tried a test. Yes – *I* tried the Magnet Challenge. It’s true, I never got a COVID vaccine, but I get lots of vaccines in my shoulders. Maybe one of THEM was injecting me with something magnetic. It was worth a test – right?
I can tell you this much. As far as I can tell, NO SHOT in my vaccination history has deposited anything in EITHER ONE of my shoulders, which interacts “human-detectably” with my neodymium refrigerator magnets. These are the SAME MAGNETS that can demonstrate the paramagnetism of iron supplements – both ferrous sulfate and ferrous glycinate. But if I “baby” the magnets on my shoulders – all over – I get nothing perceptible.
Now – granted – my fingers are not, in my scientific opinion, sensitive enough to pick up a paramagnetic effect like the drawing of the neodymium magnets to the iron supplements. Thus, my touch would not pick up too weak a ferromagnetic effect on a neodymium magnet. Likewise, my eyes are not sensitive enough to see those magnets reacting in an equal and opposite way to the iron supplements. But maybe they could pick up something stronger.
An easy way to see how neodymium refrigerator magnets react with a small amount of a ferromagnetic substance is to use a standard household staple. Unlike construction staples you get at Lowes, or office staples you get at Staples, household staples are fairly small. A box of 5000 of them weighs 0.38 pounds, including the box. Ignoring our allowed deduction of the paper box weight (we’re generous), that works out to 34.5 (heck, let’s call it an even 35) milligrams per staple.
The staple is made of zinc-coated steel, with the steel being mostly iron and carbon. But we’ll be generous, and pretend like it’s ALL IRON.
Thus, we are going to attribute whatever we see that staple do, to 35 mg of iron, when it could be a smaller amount of iron and even stronger. We’re being CONSERVATIVE in gathering our “expectations of metallic iron as normal, magnetic steel”. But you will still see that the rough numbers are very powerful.
First of all, let’s look at why I was so delighted that the staple comes in at around 35 mg. It turns out that my exemplary iron supplements contain roughly 30 or 60 milligrams of elemental iron, as either ferrous bis(glycinate) or ferrous sulfate, both paramagnetic. Thus, the amounts of iron are comparable, and we can compare the differences in forces between paramagnetic and ferromagnetic iron DIRECTLY, without adjusting the scale.
First, let’s look at MAX MAGNETISM.
If you let the magnet approach the staple, the staple will FLY TOWARD THE MAGNET at a distance of roughly 1.5-2.0 centimeters – basically 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch. Once in contact with the magnet, the staple is strongly held.
How strongly? Well, we can actually measure that. The staple, stuck through a sheet of A4 paper (comparable to 8.5 x 11), will easily hold the single sheet of paper against gravity. Will that scale up? First, I tried 10 sheets – NO DICE – gravity wins. But if I tear off sheets of paper slowly, at 8 sheets of A4, my neodymium magnets will still hold all that paper against gravity through the attraction of a SINGLE staple.
If I weigh those 8 sheets, it comes out to between 30 and 40 grams on a cheap postal spring scale. Let’s just call that 35 grams for super-duper convenience.
What this means is that magnetic forces on a 35 mg staple by that neodymium magnet are roughly 35,000 mgs, where we are being really horrible about pretending that mass is weight and vice versa, “because Earth”.
Stated differently, the magnetic force on the staple is roughly 1000 times the gravitational force on the staple.
And YES – we can really work with that. Holding up 8 sheets of paper is EASY KITCHEN SCIENCE. Much easier to demonstrate than rocking a capsule on a counter.
NOW – here is the real kicker.
Wouldn’t it be great if I could put that staple under my skin and see how my magnet reacted to it? It might be painful, but all in the name of science – right?
WELL, it turns out that you don’t HAVE to “get a piercing“. You can FAKE IT really easily.
Neodymium Head Fakes and Phony Implants
Because humans have SO MANY thin places and opposable body parts, it is not hard to FAKE the implantation of ferromagnetic substances, and then actually STUDY how a magnet behaves near them.
Well, I did this, and what I found – very SHOCKING – is that it is EXACTLY like you would imagine it in the “Magnet Challenge”. Or maybe even STRONGER.
The magnet will “do stuff”, and you will go “WHOA!”
You can PINCH a staple easily between finger and thumb, so that it is more than “skin deep”, and then move a magnet around the pinched fingertips. You can be very rigorous about maintaining a strong pinch, and insure that the metal is a certain number of millimeters “deep” in the pinch. You can control the magnet to see exactly how it behaves. And you can repeat this – OVER and OVER – looking for “tells” that the staple is there.
In my experience, the presence of something affecting the magnet was unmistakable.
Want to get that staple REALLY deep? Put it on the web of your thumb and index finger, and “close it up”.
I was able to make the staple so deep that I could not “feel it there” with a single neodymium magnet. BUT – and this is very cool – with a stack of SIX neodymium magnets, I could easily get the stack to “attract” to the deep staple in a way that I could FEEL WITH MY FINGERS. I could make the stack of magnets slow down – slide more tightly – dawdle – stick – and behave EXACTLY like it seemed the people were either FEELING or THINKING THEY WERE FEELING in the “Magnet Challenge” videos.
Do you see what we’re doing here?
We’re doing POSITIVE CONTROL EXPERIMENTS ON THE MAGNET CHALLENGE.
We are showing that what we SENSE is going on in the “Magnet Challenge” videos is a REALITY – likely from years of experience with the realities of permanent magnets in home or office. We’re not saying that the people in the Magnet Challenge videos are correct, because self-deception is very convincing to others, and thus propagates deceit. But we can be certain that there IS a reality of magnetic behavior which both the people in the videos, and we the viewers, are EXPECTING.
Now – do you want to make a prediction about what would happen if we “felt up” MythBuster Kari’s RFID with a neodymium magnet? Do it! I’m about to give you MORE DATA, and then you can either change or STRENGTHEN your prediction.
That gray stuff inside the copper antenna coil? THAT is ferrite. It’s a ferrite antenna core. You can see it more clearly here, in an RFID designed to broadcast body temperature.
It’s not a HARD ferrite like your old-school refrigerator magnets, that hold a magnetization. It’s a SOFT ferrite, designed for an antenna, that changes magnetization easily.
HERE are 4 examples that you can BUY. They were selected for being small enough to fit into an RFID tag used for pets, livestock, or MythBuster gingers.
Hey, that’s pretty wild! The average of 20 and 40 is 30 milligrams – pretty much in the ballpark of both a staple and those iron supplements.
Well SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE!
Gomer Pyle reacts to the size and mass of an RFID antenna’s ferrite core.
These ferrite cores are about the LENGTH and WEIGHT of a folded-down staple, but have a slightly bigger diameter – maybe a few staples bundled.
So what does this mean?
Fixing The Magnet Challenge
We’re now ready to begin thinking about how we might FIX the “Magnet Challenge”.
I’ve given you enough information about the size of ferrite cores, and the real behavior of staples “pretending” to be implants LIKE those containing ferrite antenna cores, that you are probably guessing – like me – that we might be able to find Kari Byron’s RFID implant by “babying a magnet” over her bicep and “feeling” for a response.
We could likely convince OURSELVES that the “challenge” potentially works, if it is ACTUALLY given the proper things to work with, by judicious and honest application of a strong permanent magnet under sensitive observation, to an actual ferromagnetic implant.
The problem is, of course, that the tiny response of the magnet to an embedded staple is just not all that convincing unless you do it yourself. An RFID tag is almost certainly comparable. Sure, you can “baby the magnet” and an honest observer may be able to tell that it’s “sticking” a little bit, but that simply doesn’t have VIRAL convincing abilities.
Well, there was ONE MORE staple experiment that I did, that I didn’t tell you about – YET. It gives away the most important “fix” of all – which is not so much at the MAGNET end, but at the HUMAN end.
Yeah, if you ask me, men don’t look all that great in earrings – and if they’re CLIP-ONS – egads. Is there anything LOWER than clip-ons?
SO, this Junkyard Wolf tried to see if he could pretty himself up with a staple earring, using his moderately weak neodymium magnets. That actually worked – although just barely – and a bit painfully, because the staple preferred to “get close” to the magnet at one end, thus pointing END-ON toward the magnet. This appears to be, in some ways, “flexible diamagnetic shaping” of the field by the flesh and the staple compromising a bit. The magnet can get closer to ONE END of the staple, moving the diamagnetic interference outward from the field, so the system does what it needs to do to reach a lower energy. With a stack of SIX neodymium magnets, the staple was downright painful, and the stack of magnets could be used to manipulate the earlobe in a very convincing way. I could actually hang the stack of magnets like a pendant earring, by letting the staple press in very close to the magnets though my earlobe.
It would have looked great on film, but – well – I’m a bit camera-shy lately.
Thus, we are led to the idea that the Magnet Challenge needs to be VISUAL to be convincing – and the visual nature needs to either EXCLUDE other forces (like surface effects), dwarf them (like moving skin around in a way that surface forces simply cannot), or show other VISUAL effects demonstrating a strong induced magnetic field at the site (perhaps by enchaining small magnetized objects like paper clips between the proposed ferrite and the magnet).
Sticking lovely Kari Byron into an MRI machine proved that implanted ferrite-core RFIDs are not “missiles of death and dismemberment” under strong magnetic fields, but it did NOT disprove that such items can be LOCATED manually and qualitatively by smaller, hand-held, strong permanent magnets.
Thus, here are some of the most convincing things that I saw while experimenting with my “positive controls”.
hanging of magnets STRONGLY against gravity, jiggling them to disprove that they are sticking by surface effects. This means “show more stick than the hanging key”. Note that even the magnet FALLING OFF from a true magnetic attraction is very convincing. The RELEASE from a magnetic attraction versus a surface stick is very diagnostic visually. A surface stick “peels”. A suddenly failing magnetic attachment “lets go”.
watching the magnet spontaneously accelerate horizontally and “slap” against skin when fastened to the end of a loosely-held, lightweight, floppy, plastic or paper “holder” of some kind. This motion is unmistakable. Suspending the magnet from a thread would work just as well (I believe Gail suggested this). Static electricity can be disproved if needed in the same video by a negative control to both flesh and magnet using paper, feather, etc.
moving skin by tugging and pulling on the magnet – NOT by pushing. This demonstrates attraction to an embedded object or objects – NOT surface forces
Now – is it possible to get even more “geeky” than that?
Absolutely.
First, let me say that normal “stud-finders” don’t work. To be more exact, they SHOULD NOT work. Nevertheless, I checked, and was pleased that Physics is intact. A common modern stud finder does NOT pick up my staple controls AT ALL – even a BLIP. This is not surprising – most stud-finders are not metal detectors. Even the ones that ARE metal-detecting are looking for steel studs and large steel nails in wooden studs. Small bits of metal like staples are NOISE to such tools.
But what about real metal detectors?
Not sure about you, but I SEE METAL. Copper, to be specific. I also see ferrites – metal oxides with substantial magnetic properties – but not so sure that modern metal detectors would fall for metal oxides, as this would cause a lot of trouble.
Arse Technocratica seems to think that metal detectors don’t find RFIDs.
“Implantable microchips are compatible with MRI machines and are not picked up by metal detectors or airport scanners.”
This does not necessarily mean RFIDs can’t be found by either metal scanners or airport detectors – it may simply mean they are found but rejected at normal settings.
I can tell you FOR A FACT that TSA-style hand-wanded metal detectors CAN (when used properly) pick up a SINGLE STAPLE underneath several sheets of paper. Yes. And not just with the sensitivity turned up to “high”, but on their normal setting.
Bottom line – I’m leaving open the possibility of small ferrite-core metal-wire antennas being detectable using metal detectors and other types of scanners.
HOWEVER – ALL of our theories about RFIDs with ferrite antennas are thrown into the dumpster by ONE PICTURE in that Ars Technica article.
This one.
WAIT A MINUTE. The needle is THAT BIG?
No way.
I consider it IMPOSSIBLY unlikely – that people getting the COVID vaccine were injected with the literal HORSE NEEDLES that are used to place RFIDs in people.
I’m sorry – there is NO WAY that monster needle is getting stuck into the average Joe or Jane getting a COVID vaccination. Not without MASSIVE social reporting of “huge needles” and “incredibly painful shots” which would – OH BY THE WAY – leave a big old lump. Sorry – THAT ain’t happening.
Look at the product:
This is where I say…..
“No way – this is not what people are getting with their Pfizer and Moderna shots. NO WAY. This Magnet Challenge is either total bullshit – or something ELSE is going on. People are NOT getting “chipped” with these big implants. Back to the drawing board”.
Seriously. Something is NOT RIGHT about the idea that people are getting “chipped”. A chip implant would be one of those little glass jobs with an antenna. Whatever is happening – it’s not THAT.
SO – if people are not getting what amount to “publicly known science” of RFID tags, with little ferrite antenna cores that MIGHT attract a magnet, what else could they possibly be getting that might still draw a magnet?
LET’S INVESTIGATE.
That will be the NEXT part of this series.
Stay tuned for Part II, in which we will examine the shocking REAL science of “magnetic” medicine, biotechnology, and nanotechnology, and how it COULD indeed relate to “magnetic vaccines”.
W
Stay Tuned For Part II…..
Referenced Discussions
We had numerous discussions of this topic on the site – here are the big or important ones. Please see them for extensive discussions and early attempts to understand the magnetization phenomenon.
