“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that degrades animal tissues, and is responsible for the very distinctive giant-pock-mark-wound-forming symptoms of recluse bites. The brown recluse does not have as much of this protein in its venom as do some other recluses. The worst recluse, distributed over several countries in South America, has roughly ten times as much sphingomyelinase D as the North American brown recluse. Bites by THAT recluse not only result in deep wounds – they result in SYSTEMIC effects much more often than do bites of the “mere” brown recluse. Fatalities are much more common.
But just stop and think – THAT is how potent protein venoms can be. The tiny bite of a spider with a tiny bit of a protein in it – mere micrograms – can leave a 10-inch hole in the leg, with life-threatening systemic effects.
Snake venoms use different proteins from spiders in their venoms. Some spiders like the black widow have neurotoxic venoms, which affect nervous function, and some snakes like cobras have DIFFERENT neurotoxic venoms.
The honey badger is, weirdly, somewhat immune to the paralyzing neurotoxic cobra venom (jump to near the end of the video).
Many snakes have hemotoxic venoms, and THOSE venoms tend to cause cardiovascular problems. Interestingly, one of those problems is a somewhat rare clotting disorder called thrombocytopenia.
Thus, when I heard that this uncommon symptom was sometimes occurring as a coronavirus vaccine adverse effect, I suspected that there might be a protein cause – the spike protein – acting similarly to proteins in those hemotoxic snake venoms.
If that were the case, we should expect the same effect to be caused by COVID-19 itself, sometimes.
Should we just jump on such an analogy? One that is based on the ASSUMPTION that the spike protein is causing thrombocytopenia? Or at least similarly involved in the two cases?
Let’s think about this.
One of the things which is most fascinating about the BRANCH COVIDIANS – including the high clergy in government and media – is just how STRONGLY they tend to discourage alternative perspectives on COVID-19 – doing so in a way which is alarming even by the normal standards of narrative-setting and enforcement.
For example, at the very beginning, social media gatekeepers were needlessly hostile to Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell’s “high-altitude sickness” perspective on COVID-19 hypoxia, despite the fact that this led to a very beneficial new policy on keeping patients OFF vents, probably saving millions of lives, as well as giving us all a better understanding of HOW COVID-19 is and (more importantly) is NOT damaging lungs of patients.
Millions of lives. Think about it. Not a bad save – unless you want a guy named Trump GONE by any means necessary.
Now, some of these “different” perspectives can and do lead to non-working or just plain wrong theories at a micro-level, but so can ANY perspective. Dr. Kyle-Sidell’s ideas led to a variety of hemoglobin-related and malaria-related theories of COVID-19 which were neither fundamentally true nor useful, and which theories died on their own, without any need for censorship, but which were part of a questioning movement which also led to increased recognition of the endothelial nature of the coronavirus attack on patients’ lungs and other organs.
A CHANGE in perspective which WAS and IS fruitful.
Whether we are talking about damage to capillaries in the lungs, vein occlusions in the retina, or organ damage, particularly in the heart or kidneys, it appears that the cardiovascular endothelium is where COVID-19 does the most damage.
Comorbidities which already involve damage or potential damage to blood vessels – particularly diabetes and endocrine or cardiovascular diseases – are thus particularly dangerous, as SARS-CoV-2 and (presumably) its spike protein – which is what attacks cells – would be attacking an already weak point of failure.
I want to thank GrandmaInTexas for those two most recent examples of COVID vaccinations precipitating fatal outcomes in people with both diagnosed and undiagnosed comorbidities. For the record, Dan Kaminsky’s vaccine was undoubtedly either Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson+Johnson, while Actor Vivekh’s vaccine was Covaxin. The former 3 are all genetic vaccines – the latter is inactivated whole virus. All of them use the WHOLE spike protein in some form or another to trigger immunity.
Here is a handy principle which I call “spike protein equivalence”, as a special case of “vaccine immunological equivalence”.
If some affliction, condition, or mere FACTOR happens to be BAD for a potential victim of COVID-19 itself, then it’s also going to be bad for recipients of the vaccine. The difference is only that – most likely – in MOST cases – the vaccine constitutes a far lighter assault on the patient, than the disease itself.
THAT is the basic logic of vaccination. REDUCE THE RISK. But nonetheless, ACCEPT A RISK.
Do not kid yourself. The WHOLE POINT of vaccines is to entertain a lesser risk – a risk that is not as bad as the disease. The only question is “how less bad” does any particular vaccine happen to be. Based upon that information, one has INFORMED CONSENT.
People need to understand risks clearly in order to take those risks smartly.
Or NOT take them. Where the lyric“If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice” operates against the circling helicopters of COVID-19 and any successor viruses.
When we do not honestly face the risks and benefits of vaccines, we end up with the psychotic disconnect we now see, where people who SHOULD be voices of reason and trust – like the CDC – are LYING and losing half or more of the nation as trusting followers.
Rather than re-hash here how the CDC has lied to us already, or why the handy principles of “spike protein equivalence” and “snake protein analogy” work so well in understanding COVID disease and vaccine risks, let me give you links to my most recent discussions of the relevant thought.
The FIRST ONE is probably the most comprehensive, and helps to understand the rest.
PREFACE I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT. The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – …
Alternate Title: Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective? Gloating Pre-Preface There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought. Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY …
Every coronavirus vaccine so far has shown us SOME defect upon mass release, which was NOT evident in EVEN phase III clinical trials. Look HERE for a searchable PDF document of adverse effects from the Pfizer vaccine: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/977005/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf Check out these videos on the low-platelet clotting problem from the Oxford/Astrazeneca vaccine. Here is a fantastic …
I saw an excellent explanation of the clotting problem with the AstraZeneca vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 here: The doctor, Dr. ZDogg, MD, offers an exceptionally clear explanation of both what is going on with the AstraZeneca vaccine, and why its distribution was halted or limited in some places for some age groups of patients. …
I am not the only person who is seeing that the SPIKE PROTEIN and variants are interesting beasts. Cthulhu tipped me off to THESE TWO GEMS by Karl Denninger, which are extraordinarily worthwhile:
Even though these deal primarily with spike protein equivalence rather than the snake protein analogy, the latter of which Cthulhu mentioned in his tip (he knew I would like these), there is some even more shocking perspective in the second link, in which Denninger simply asks – why did we use the WHOLE sequence of the spike protein which we received from China?
Beyond simple blame games, in which I could postulate that “whole spike protein vaccines” may have resulted from dumb psychology, or even malicious treachery by one or more parties, I can ALSO place Denninger’s question in the context of both failing to ask “Stoecker questions” about “should we base vaccines on the WHOLE spike protein?”, AND the idea that – intentionally or unintentionally – by whoever – we essentially fell into China’s version of the plot of Species…..
OR – if we don’t want to be all negative about things, try the Earth-saving genetic sequence reconstruction sub-plot of The Fifth Element, with a few more plot devices about process-skipping on the internal growth code, also a bit of a lesson.
Is such “gain of function” good or bad? One could view horsepox-based smallpox vaccine adoption as “gain of function” – a low-level example of the intelligent acceleration of evolution as a “natural” part of evolution itself.
As an aside, IMO the reason they use women for these scenes is ultimately the same reason the spike protein seems to target women’s physiology more than men’s, and that men are actually the first utilitarian sex robots, but – well – it’s so simple, it’s complicated. Patriarchy is both overrated and overstated, shall we just say.
ANYWAY, back to snakebite. “Cleopatra meets spike protein” – only worse.
VAERS reports a breastfeeding five-month old infant has died of TTP – a rare clotting disorder linked to, yes, low platelets. He became ill one day after his mother received her second @pfizer shot.
I actually saved that whole report, which is not easily linked, as a series of images:
Before I go on, let me just say that immunology strikes me as a lot like quantum mechanics. If anybody says they truly understand it, it’s almost a sign that they don’t. Nevertheless, basic suspicions work like crazy in either field, which is, again, interesting. In either field, it doesn’t take a genius to see that – 99% of the time – a snake in the grass IS a snake in the grass.
Already, the entire Snopesian Empire is fired up over this case.
SEEK anything related, and you will FIND – both WHEAT and CHAFF.
READ, and you will FIND – both INTERESTING and HOLLOW.
No matter how many guns they get working and belt-fed, cross-firing with their diversionary strawman arguments on this one case, the fact of the matter is that TTP is intimately linked to immune disorders, immune responses, and vaccination, so if it shows up, vaccines are and will remain the likeliest suspect NO MATTER WHAT. All Fauci’s horses and all Pfizer’s men are not going to get rid of the NOTABLY MANY cases of TTP , other thrombocytopenic clotting disorders, and clotting disorders in general, which are showing up in (1) COVID cases, (2) COVID recoverees, (3) vaccination adverse events, and (4) vaccination of recoverees in particular.
The relationship of TTP to vaccines and “malappropriate antibodies” in particular is UNDERSTOOD SCIENCE. This is not going away, despite the near-dogmatic narrative that “COVID vaccines do no harm” at the public level, reinforced by the narrative that “fighting vaccine hesitancy is worth LYING about adverse effects”.
No, it’s not.
Skip the following scientific review unless you feel nerdy. I recommend just skimming in either case. But I promise – the deeper you dig here, the more WHEAT you will find.
TTP as a function of age of onset and mechanism for ADAMTS13 deficiency. The proportions of adulthood-/childhood-onset TTP and acquired/inherited TTP, respectively, presented in this figure were calculated from the data of the French Registry for TTP (840 patients).10,13 These data are in agreement with miscellaneous demographic data reported in the literature by other teams.3,5-9 The diagram shows 100 patients with TTP, each patient being represented by a symbol, either a square for patients with adulthood-onset TTP (91%) or a circle for patients with childhood-onset TTP (9%). Acquired TTP is presented in blue (94.5%), and inherited TTP (USS) in red (5.5%). Interestingly, the proportion of USS is very low (2.5%) in adulthood-onset TTP, whereas it is as high as 33% in childhood-onset USS.
Abstract
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare and life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, severe thrombocytopenia, and organ ischemia linked to disseminated microvascular platelet rich-thrombi. TTP is specifically related to a severe deficiency in ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 repeats, member 13), the specific von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease. ADAMTS13 deficiency is most frequently acquired via ADAMTS13 autoantibodies, but rarely, it is inherited via mutations of the ADAMTS13 gene. The first acute episode of TTP usually occurs during adulthood, with a predominant anti-ADAMTS13 autoimmune etiology. In rare cases, however, TTP begins as soon as childhood, with frequent inherited forms. TTP is ∼2-fold more frequent in women, and its outcome is characterized by a relapsing tendency. Rapid recognition of TTP is crucial to initiate appropriate treatment. The first-line therapy for acute TTP is based on daily therapeutic plasma exchange supplying deficient ADAMTS13, with or without steroids. Additional immune modulators targeting ADAMTS13 autoantibodies are mainly based on steroids and the humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. In refractory or unresponsive TTP, more intensive therapies including twice-daily plasma exchange; pulses of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, or cyclosporine A; or salvage splenectomy are considered. New drugs including N-acetylcysteine, bortezomib, recombinant ADAMTS13, and caplacizumab show promise in the management of TTP. Also, long-term follow-up of patients with TTP is crucial to identify the occurrence of other autoimmune diseases, to control relapses, and to evaluate psychophysical sequelae. Further development of both patients’ registries worldwide and innovative drugs is still needed to improve TTP management.
So what does TTP look like?
See those pictures? You may want to THINK TWICE about the coronavirus vaccine if you ALREADY have this risky potential outcome of either the disease or the vaccine. I have a link showing that TTP is a high risk in COVID recoverees who get any of the vaccines – I just can’t find it now.
We ARE seeing some public recognition of adverse effects now:
However, as is visible in this article, we are not seeing ANY contraindications to vaccination being admitted publicly. The advice tends to be “get vaccinated, and if you don’t die, but have bad symptoms, see your doctor.
“Sure, Dr. Stalin. Sure. Say – you don’t have any recommendations to PREVENT THIS from happening again to somebody else now, do you? Those would be called ‘contraindications’. Most drugs have them.”
However, I think some recognition is coming. And why is that? Well…..
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …
…..we discussed other disorders – affecting reproductive health, you might say – that MAY or MAY NOT be mediated through the SAME or DIFFERENT activities of the spike protein.
THAT is an interesting question, actually. How economic is spike protein activity? How MUCH strategic information is carried, and at what density? How efficient ARE proteins at carrying smaller-molecular strategies into “genetic warfare”? We may not have those answers yet – and certainly not in PUBLIC SCIENCE – for some time.
Still, I think these questions will eventually be asked and answered, because the menstrual/gestational and clotting effects of the vaccines are so startling, that people are going to ask questions and get answers, whether the “mainstream” (meaning government/corporate) media wants to ask them or not, or to see them answered.
In that regard, we will carry on, asking questions and getting answers, carrying the principle of SPIKE PROTEIN EQUIVALENCE with us, as a handy and useful physiological tool.
The idea of SNAKE PROTEIN ANALOGY will become less of a medical utility, and more of a METAPHOR.
There is a refreshing honesty and innocence in this guy’s work. But more than that, he just has a way of catching small details that everybody else misses, and making them beautifully prominent. His portraits of famous figures are quite wonderful in this way. He will completely drop many of the features of those people that I love and see prominently as part of my personal recognition algos, and yet childishly play up awesome things I never noticed.
And with that, let’s talk about Eve.
Our next installment is going to go BACK IN TIME, and show you something very startling about WHEN all this COVID vaccine technology was actually invented.
A lot earlier than anybody wants to admit publicly. Here is a hint.
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon
When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to one of the coronavirus vaccines, I never considered for a moment – AT THAT TIME – that it might have been an INTENDED outcome by anybody. It was only slowly, later, that such a possibility began to sink in.
We tend to view pregnancy as a somewhat “iffy” condition, and vaccination as one of the infinite “iffy” things which could derail it. We tend to view outcomes, other than the really obvious, as “acts of God” – if not at the level of the instance, then at the level of fortune – such as family genetics. “Something is wrong” – but it’s never anybody’s fault.
Well, what if one could change “fortune”?
I was NOT surprised that a virtue-signaling doctor might take a coronavirus vaccine while pregnant. I WAS surprised that there was NO medical advice contrary to pregnant women getting the vaccine – that pregnancy was NOT a contraindication. Pregnant women are a SMALL subset of the population, centered age-wise on the sweet spot of coronavirus survivability. Why take a chance?
Nope – not a whisper of it, even in the aftermath of the lady doctor’s misfortune. Indeed, only on the DARK CONSPIRACY WEB was there even a hint that maybe the good lady doctor should have done something other than happily getting the vaccine.
That was the state of things for me, until there were reports of clotting problems with AstraZeneca, affecting mostly women.
Then, there were the clotting problems of the Johnson+Johnson vaccine, AGAIN affecting almost exclusively women.
Singingsoul asked about the possibility of any relationship to “the pill”. That REALLY got me thinking about the seeming sex linkage to clotting. However, I made no connection back to miscarriages or stillbirths.
That connection did not happen for me, until there were reports of “menstruation upon vaccination”. THAT sure sounded like a “day after pill” to this longtime observer of Big Pharma. THAT would explain a miscarriage or a stillbirth AND the sudden induction of menstruation.
THE SPIKE PROTEIN. An abortifacient? Even if only a “five-percenter”?
It suddenly made me wonder.
I mean, if we were actually dealing with…..
RU-486 The Vaccine, that meant we were probably dealing with…..
No – not THAT structure – THIS one. Or THESE two. Both of them SWARMING with possibilities.
Now THAT is something. Something which could be PROVEN in a lab.
Probably not a lab that would get any modern funding, unless the author was KNOWN to submit scientific truth to globalist narrative, but still…. SOME “errant” lab might “accidentally” prove it to MY satisfaction. And that’s all the science *I* need to keep moving “forward”, past globalist control of science.
Interesting possibility. No?
You can bet your LIFE that the Democrats ARE afraid of any correlation here, and WILL distract like crazy from even the possibility of such a correlation being contemplated by the public.
And there is a LOT of circumstantial suspicion here.
It still remains unclear which hands moved which chess pieces where, in terms of release of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but HOWEVER things happened, it certainly appears that a virus, which VERY LIKELY negatively affects human reproduction and coincidentally “gets rid of Trump presidencies“, conveniently escaped a Chinese lab, in an event that helped – IN MANY WAYS – the principal advocates if not worshipers of free and easy human abortion: Democrats, globalists, and Chinese communists.
How amazing is THAT?
The party of abortion, the movement of abortion, and the nation of abortion, may have just gotten a “statistically effective but plausibly deniable abortion cold” which – if you don’t change the abortion protein too much – or more specifically in the wrong directions – gives one an abortion vaccine having the same wonderful properties of denied responsibility – plus the properties of continuous excuse and adjustable frequency of administration, only needing MORE of what the CDC is very good at providing.
LIES.
In my opinion, these three human control stakeholders are going to do EVERYTHING possible to not merely shut down any consideration of their possible treachery – they will desperately reframe Fake Science to turn such a pharmacological desideratum into either a null, or an irremovable side effect. That is, if they can’t make PERCEPTION of the entire problem simply go away.
BUT LET’S BACK UP.
My normal skepticism of every new assertion of female lunar pheromonal menstrual mystery is not because I don’t believe that some new, unexplained mense magic is POSSIBLE, but simply because the first step of science is to look for any obvious explanations of new magic using old theories.
However, one does not have to reach very deep into “old theory” to figure out that “I got a shot and my uterus dumped” is eminently explainable as a simple pharmacological effect. If more than one woman says this, it’s very UNLIKELY to be due to mass mommy hysteria, and much more likely that the inner scientist in a whole bunch of women just raised her hands in class.
And when it finally gets stated publicly by the “generally respected class radical”, watch out.
Repinning this warning from last night, when I was called a "conspiracy theorist"'for warning that COVID vaccines are causing blood clotting, stillbirths and bizarre menses in women. Today FDA halt J and J vaccine for blood clots. https://t.co/4JilJxxKZU
— Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. (@naomirwolf) April 13, 2021
Let’s do that as an IMAGE which Twitter can’t delete and hide.
Now I would be remiss if I didn’t point out that the J+J recall, connected to VIPIT and/or TTP, is not clearly pharmacologically DIRECTLY connected to the observed menstrual symptoms in women, which are (IMO) more properly described as antiprogestogenic or abortive in nature. Yes, dysfunctional clotting is an issue with women taking a more mildly antiprogestational regimen of hormonal control known as the pill – an important clue that Singingsoul put me onto very early. So YES – “blood issues” tag along with the hormonal aspects of menstruation and gestation for all kinds of good and obvious reasons in menstruating mammals.
So if things just stopped there – at a protein with apparently striking but somewhat randomly effective antiprogestogenic activity, it would be all I would need to wrap this 5%-er conspiracy up TIGHT. It would – IMO – demonstrate some kind of intent, by somebody, somewhere, to force humanity into a more contraceptive future. It’s an elegant checkmate move, IMO, due to the DISEASE which is almost certainly hard to eliminate.
Very nicely, there is nothing WEIRD, MAGICAL, or SPOOKY about a highly potent antiprogestogenic protein, released first as a virus, and then as a vaccine, by a technocratic, power-holding oligarchy, which believes fervently in the social, societal, and civilizational effects of that protein.
It’s kinda weird that such medical cunning got into a virus, with our level of public scientific ability, but I can come up with several excellent theories as to how that happened – with varying degrees of believability, depending upon which particular secrets you believe the Deep State holds.
The trouble is, we have OTHER alleged evidence that we are now being asked to believe – that “people close to people being vaccinated” – BUT NOT ACTUALLY VACCINATED – are somehow, sometimes, showing symptoms. Setting aside the possibility of at least partial disinformation, including intentional discreditation and obfuscation (very likely in any case), this stuff borders on mense magic.
However – HOLD MY BEER at the Friday night lab outing to the bar. I’ve got a theory (hic).
Some of this stuff is also explicable by other potential scientific aspects of a putative antiprogestogenic or otherwise abortive spike protein – things which may indeed be credible science.
In fact, the “more bizarre stuff” could help to explain the “less bizarre stuff”, because it argues for a contraceptive potency which is more likely to be found in a prostaglandin analog like misoprostol, or a peptide hormone (you know, a small protein) like oxytocin, than in an antiprogestogen like mifepristone or lilopristone.
This gets into how RU-486 is administered, and how it actually works. It turns out that RU-486 is in fact the “less important actor” of the day-after pill.
I repeat. I want you to understand. RU-486 was a kind of beautiful social and scientific DECOY, DISTRACTION, and MISDIRECTION.
The primary abortifacient drug in the “day-after pill” is not actually mifepristone, a.k.a. RU-486, but the co-drug misoprostol.
This would not be the first time that Democrats DISTRACTED and MISDIRECTED to the lesser of two scandals so that the more murderous one would get off. Thus – IMO – RU-486 took Cuomo-kissing levels of media heat precisely so that the abortion-meister misoprostol would SKATE like a nursing home scandal with thousands of dead people.
Dosing of misoprostol for abortion – with or without anything else – is typically below 1 mg as a single dose, absorbed through the oral mucosa. Note that route of entry. That is a HUGE potency. One milligram is hardly anything at all. The fact that 1 mg of ANY substance will cause an abortion is, quite frankly, startling news.
Addition of RU-486 (200 mg) to the regimen of misoprostol (800 μg = 0.8 mg) alone RAISES the success of abortion from about 88% to near total, so if the spike protein is primarily showing a prostaglandin / oxytocin activity, then the spike protein could have almost any level of antiprogestogenic activity and still be a wickedly good abortifacient / contraceptive.
And speaking of that OLDER alternative to misoprostol, namely oxytocin – well, THAT particular uterine-contracting, labor-inducing substance is a peptide, i.e. a protein fragment. Which certainly argues that the idea of a spike protein having oxytoxin-like activity isn’t complete science fiction.
Note that oxytocin is only 9 amino acids long. Easy to hide in a longer sequence. And possibly as a DIFFERENT small sequence, because of protein 3-D dynamics.
·Cys – Tyr – Ile – Gln – Asn – Cys – Pro – Leu – Gly – NH2
Alternatively…..
CYIQNCPLG-NH2
SO – let’s state this for the record. If the spike protein or some fragment thereof has some kind of oxytocin activity, then we pretty much have our bad guy. The potency of oxytocin is even greater than that of misoprostol. One international unit (IU) of oxytocin is the equivalent of 1.68 μg of pure peptide. That is less than two MICROGRAMS per unit. The dose for adult abortion is roughly 10 to 30 IU, which translates to 16.8 to 50.4 micrograms. A very small fraction of a single milligram.
This is – bluntly – more potent than LSD.
Thus, it is entirely possible that if the spike protein or fragments spat back out from genetic incorporation of its instructions, somehow have oxytoxin activity, then that protein / peptide could act as a kind of contraceptive / abortifacient.
Are you with me?
OK – armed with THAT knowledge, listen to the following amazing discussion. Don’t pay attention so much to their hyperbole about “biological warfare”, or charming innocent errors about [this is a logical paraphrase] “digital lipid nanotechnology” – the stuff that makes it possible to call these people “conspiracy theorists” despite what I think are fairly impressive backgrounds on some of them. Pay attention to factual observations and reports, and ask if they are plausible when dealing with an extremely potent hormonal substance, where the amount needed to obtain strong biological effects is not only capable of being produced by the human body – the amount of substance needed to achieve the effect in self or other is BARELY EVEN VISIBLE.
So what do you think? I’ll let you decide for yourselves.
I don’t believe in unexplainable magic – I believe in science. But SCIENCE can explain stuff that does almost seem magical. And I think it could very well explain what people are observing here.
Thus, I believe that we may indeed be seeing some kind of real antiprogestogenic, prostaglandin, and/or oxytocin effect from the spike protein or a subunit thereof.
A “contraceptive” effect, basically. And most likely small enough to escape obvious notice, but BIG enough that when everybody is forced to take the vaccine, even during pregnancy, it “does its thing” and gives the depopulationist socialists a 5% solution.
It may not appear always, or always strongly enough to show up in every person, but it only has to show up in a FRACTION of people getting the disease, or taking the vaccine, to significantly change the world.
Indeed, if the effect is TOO STRONG, one cannot “get away with it”. But if the “worshipers of sacred abortion” just nickel and dime us, they can get a GOOD START on depopulation.
Check out these videos on the low-platelet clotting problem from the Oxford/Astrazeneca vaccine.
Here is a fantastic explanation of the AstraZeneca problem and what people are doing about it.
You will note that Dr. ZDogg, MD points the J+J vaccine being at risk of having the same clotting problem as the AstraZeneca vaccine, due to them BOTH using DNA (as opposed to mRNA) and viral vector (as opposed to liposome) delivery technologies.
I just learned something today from C&EN that may impact this.
It turns out that Pfizer, Moderna and J+J are ALL using the “2P mutation” of the spike protein, but AstraZeneca is not. This mutation significantly CHANGES the spike protein, preventing it from leaving the “pre-attack” molecular shape.
Is THAT the difference? Does the 2P mutation prevent the spike protein from causing problems? Stay tuned! The J+J vaccine will get intense scrutiny going forward.
Now – J+J has had a problem of being WEAK from the very beginning, but STATISTICALLY it has still shifted people AWAY from being hospitalized or dying. People may have still caught the disease after vaccination, but they were never going to the hospital or dying – a LOT like hydroxychloroquine administered early, or better still, the Zelenko protocol.
A short while back, one gal in New York got COVID about a month after getting J&J.
She was not hospitalized. This was a living example of the admitted weakness of the J+J vaccine. NOW, however, somebody who got J+J DID get COVID and DID go to the hospital, so the “promise” you will not go to the hospital with the J+J vaccine just got a bit weaker.
Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective?
Gloating Pre-Preface
There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought.
Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY OF THE SCAM gets ahead of them. CDC is lying to us so badly. SO badly.
It’s all good, people. I’m on these bastards like BLACK on TAR.
Notice that the governor’s WIFE also tested positive later. But most importantly, notice how the news never asks the RIGHT QUESTIONS connecting the vaccine to the positive test. Instead, we get LIES.
The FAKE NEWS is going along with this crap. They are so deep in this.
Yes, we are now in peak MITHRIDATISM that they wanted to turn into the MIDAS TOUCH of SPIKE PROTEIN.
Such a SCAM.
In my opinion, the CDC should be CLOSED as a CRIME SCENE.
Thank you, Greg. You are a SCIENTIST, and when you felt SYMPTOMS you forced them into coughing up the DATA that reveals how badly they SCAMMED us, and how badly they continue to scam us.
I think Fauci knows exactly what I know. He could tell you EXACTLY why this happened. And once Rand Paul reads this, he’ll know, too. Somebody needs to start cornering Fauci on all this crap.
It ALL goes somewhere.
LOOSE SCIENCE that you know and everybody else doesn’t is a MAGIC ACT. BAD FAUCI!
I’m seeing into the psy-op, people. I’m seeing so deeply.
THE SPIKE MUST FLOW. AND FLOW AND FLOW AND FLOW. It’s the KEY to the SCAM.
Once you see the spike protein CORRECTLY, you see why they do everything they do.
How much you want to bet Bill Gates is wise to this stuff?
Real Preface
I have come to the conclusion that something is very wrong with COVID-19 and the vaccines thereof, and I think I’ve finally put my finger on the scientific macguffin that ties all the skeevy, sketchy stuff together – reverse transcription.
That would be that little red arrow back to DNA from RNA.
It turns out that reverse transcription, and vaccines for diseases that might code for it, are very “Fauci”.
Learn to code. It’s KEY.
Too many things “political, organizational, governmental, and media” have not added up about the phony “plague”. Going beyond that, too much SCIENCE about the “novel coronavirus” and vaccines being offered for them, simply did not add up.
At least, not until now.
It’s not my inner conspiracy theorist which is finding a problem here – it’s my inner scientist. I am having great difficulties rationalizing certain seemingly careless choices which have resulted in some of the most problematic and badly framed medical offerings since “eye of newt” and “really large leeches for anemia“.
I am having a scientific problem with TESTING that is so bad – so intentionally bad – that it borders on the freaking Ouija Board.
And FAUCI KNEW.
It’s all the result of DISHONEST SCIENCE.
Background: “Science Is Real”
I’m not exactly anti-science, having worked in science all my life. I’m not even opposed to “transhumanism”, which I don’t think is inherently and necessarily BAD. The idea of expanding my memory without putting Google or Facebook or anybody else in charge of it? Talk to me. I’m listening.
I’ve ALWAYS gotten the flu vaccine – ALWAYS. I NEVER miss it. That’s not exactly transhumanism, but it shows that, for most of my life, I had great TRUST in medical science. In fact, I would even say I still do. Generally speaking.
I’ve had vaccines for everything I could get – even the RABIES vaccine, when I was bitten by a bat. The rabies vaccine is, in fact, one of the STRONGEST defenses of vaccination in medical history. No vaccine opponent WILL or SHOULD turn down the rabies vaccine – it is a HUGE success story in medicine. If you get bitten by a rabid animal, the rabies vaccine promptly administered against that SLOW virus will SAVE YOUR LIFE. Some vaccines are of arguable worth, but the rabies vaccine is not one of them.
Indeed, I consider myself to be something of a gourmet, or at the very least a connoisseur of vaccines. Previous “reviews” of vaccines on this site have featured my lovely assistant, Miss Direction, néeRetroculture, who helps me convince people that vaccines weren’t always questionable, and might even be good for people.
Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and ANTI-VAX at the same time. I mean, what’s the use of FREE SPEECH if we can’t use it to troll EVERYBODY – including PENCILNECK? Whoops – WRONG PENCILNECK. Let’s try …
Perhaps you recall my PREVIOUS correspondence and “review” of the new, two-shot shingles vaccine, Shingrix – or more specifically, my review of the FIRST SHOT. Wolf’s Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and …
I was anticipating getting one of the new coronavirus vaccines – and was holding out for the first one PROVEN to be safe for recoverees from COVID-19, one of whom I happen to be.
My lungs aren’t that good anymore – not after COVID-19 seared them like some kind of biological chlorine gassing on the front lines in France. I have to be very careful. Another case of COVID, or pulmonary / vascular coronavirus vaccine side effects of comparable severity, might actually “finish me off”.
So – I’m SHOPPING. And I mean SMART SHOPPING. I’ve been paying a LOT of attention to the new vaccines, and trying to understand their technologies, their benefits, their risks, and the science behind them. I simply can’t afford to make a mistake on side effects. Not if I want to enjoy the retirement for which I worked LONG and HARD.
I already knew quite a bit of the science behind COVID and the new vaccines – enough that it has been easy for me to follow the scientific news about these things. I’m not a virologist, an epidemiologist, a vaccine expert, or a molecular biologist, but I’ve worked with such people for much of my life. I picked up a few key ideas in the process. I’ve also come up with a few scientific ideas and principles of my own, but that is largely because I’m a devotee of the history of science, which gives perspective on science.
If you don’t think science can be WRONG, and that large numbers – HERDS – of scientists therein, can go OVER A CLIFF, just take a look at Planet Vulcan, Lysenkoism, The Great Leap Forward, and science in the Third Reich – a seminar on the latter having been quite instructive in my youth. It was not simple how the scientific masses in Germany were led astray, once socialist politics DRAGGED, PUSHED, and SCARED them away from “Jewish Science”. The top echelons of German science, filled with Jews and their friends and spouses, were forced into horrible choices, as some of the best science and scientists were politically rejected over a real social stupidity which fractured and destroyed what was arguably the leading scientific nation on the planet.
None of that had to happen – but it did.
Don’t think we’re immune from scientific debacle. We’re not. Socialism is the greatest “hold my beer” knucklehead that science ever green-lighted into a dysfunctional relationship. He’s always coming back on Saturday night with roses and cherry vodka, after the “last” last time he wrecked Science’s cute little sports car.
Science normally checks itself for errors – and it is my contention that the checking needs to be extensive – all the way out to society as a whole – including stakeholder scientists, non-stakeholder scientists, and even the non-scientific public at large. Sure, you can skip the non-stakeholders and the public, but is it wise? Hardly, in my opinion. The smaller the group needing to be fooled, the easier it is to accomplish things which society simply does not want, or which have vast intended or unintended consequences.
Yuri Geller proved that scientists are easy to fool. James Randi made that point even more strongly. And I have my own take on it, which adds pushy and manipulative politics of any kind as a RISK to science. The same “sale by urgency” which works for salesmen at the appliance store, works in science. Many of us – particularly those of us with historical perspective – saw this problem in climate science. Now, we see it in COVID and vaccines. We are being rushed into something, for some reason. The questions are WHAT and WHY.
I’m going to assume that most people reading this, have started to grasp enough of the basics of viruses and vaccines, and particularly the new mRNA and DNA vaccines, that they don’t need “the way things are supposed to work” explained to them. Indeed, if you go out, and absorb all the “mainstream” journalism on COVID – science sites – mainstream media – cable networks – your favorite non-conspiratorial “science guys” – fact checkers – explaining the way things are SUPPOSED TO WORK, you will be thoroughly and smartly educated by excellent science.
If you want, try this great link courtesy of Ethical Skeptic, one of my favorite “dissident scientists” out there, pulling us back from the current “woke Lysenkoism” we seem to be in.
Good summary of the unique structure of the Spike Protein mRNA vaccine and how it differs from the Coronavirus' Spike Protein RNA in pseudouridylyl Ψ and synonymous codon stealth.
See? Yeah, I’m a grade-A conspiracy theorist, because I told you to look at Snopes, and not some clickbait site saying these vaccines are injecting nanobots into you to turn you into something non-human.
The PROBLEM with the conspiracy theories on vaccination isn’t so much DIRECTION as it is MAGNITUDE. It’s all over-reach. Silly, perhaps well-intended, but self-discrediting overreach. Much of it is clickbait or psy-op. A lot of it is actually true – at some small level – often orders of magnitude less dramatic than the headline claims. I can talk to the consumers of such in terms they will understand, and I’m generally talking them DOWN and BACK to what are more scientifically grounded problems with the new vaccines. And there are some. Which is the POINT of this entire piece.
In this essay, I am now talking primarily to what might be called “vaccination normies”, who are – like me – normally rather trusting of vaccines, but perhaps feel like there’s something not quite right about the current situation. These are people who have SOME vaccine hesitancy, but are likewise leery of TRULY baseless skepticism of science.
I’m talking about the people who put “SCIENCE IS REAL” yard signs out in front of their houses. There is a side of me that likes that. However, there is a side of me that wants to put out a sign that drops LOVE IS LOVE (Pedo? No way!) and all the rest, and sticks to what I know about science from the inside:
SCIENCE IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC FRAUD IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC GREED IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC BIAS IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC ERROR IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC DECEPTION IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC SELF-DECEPTION IS REAL
SCIENCE IS REALLY MESSED UP
SCIENCE IS STILL BEAUTIFUL
You see what I’m sayin’? You want SCIENCE, you get the whole, lovely, crazy, smart, dumb, dysfunctional bimbo who thinks she can handle SOCIALISM, and ends up on some frat party lawn in a lab coat and a mini-skirt, throwing her shoes at strangers, demanding somebody take her home, and SHE’S NOT DRUNK.
Yeah. I knew that crazy, wonderful bitch.
Wolf’s Take on Coronavirus Vaccines
You can check out my posting history here to follow the chronology of my thinking on coronavirus vaccines, but I’ll try to recap toward my current thinking, and what seems to be wrong with them. I am going to lead you up to my last post on the vaccines, where I almost saw what I’m seeing now, plus a whole bunch of other stuff.
PREFACE I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT. The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – …
The first news that really grabbed me was about Inovio – a DNA vaccine – a “Bill Gates” vaccine (almost all are, TBH) – and thus one of what I will refer to as genetic vaccines. Such vaccines are not supposed to work by modifying one’s genes or genome, despite the word genetic. They simply exploit cellular biochemical processes CLOSER to the genes, using the known biology of genetic expression. They dump DNA or messenger RNA (or a close facsimile thereof, to be more precise) into existing cellular processes, to “fool” the processes into creating – in the case of the current coronavirus vaccines – a stabilized form of the spike protein of the virus.
At the time, I noticed that these would be THE FIRST genetic vaccines being tested in or deployed successfully in humans. And this is where things get “iffy”. Just a little bit.
The next vaccine to get into the news in a big way was Moderna – an mRNA vaccine, again using a full and slightly stabilized spike protein as the antigen, but created in vivo via the mRNA genetic instructions thereof. While Moderna seemed to be successful in its first clinical trials, the side effects were noteworthy, frequent, and fairly significant – even compared to the notoriously “spicy”, arm-reddening-and-bicep-swelling, shingles vaccine, Shingrix. As one respected “pro-vax” scientist of my old acquaintance put it, they would have to kill him to give him the Moderna vaccine. He was definitely thinking the same thing I was thinking. Rush job, problems, keep looking.
My initial hopes quickly moved toward Novavax. Novavax is NOT an mRNA or DNA vaccine. It uses the same full stabilized spike protein strategy as the others, but it provides the spike protein AS spike protein, using a nifty little nanochemical “pincushion” to hold the spikes in an outwardly facing array, thus to engage receptors properly and at LOW DOSAGE. This is an excellent strategy that AVOIDS the unknowns of mRNA vaccines like Moderna, or DNA vaccines like Inovio or Russia’s Sputnik V.
The most significant risks of spike protein vaccines like Novavax are the risks of the spike protein itself, NOT of abusing the genetic processes to CREATE the spike protein in vivo, like Moderna. Indeed, Moderna scientists admitted in one of their first papers on their vaccine, that there ARE unknown potentials for long-term side effects with mRNA vaccines. Go find the paper – it’s there. They couch the admission in gentle and somewhat obscuring language, but the disclaimer is there. It has to be. They’re being honest.
mRNA vaccines in animals have not been uniformly free of side effects, to put it VERY kindly. We can argue about the severity of those side effects, and whether they extrapolate to humans, but I suppose we will find out now. The risks are there, and they tend to be long-term. So – in full disclosure – there are RISKS to mRNA vaccines. The older you are, the less the long-term risks matter, and conveniently, the higher the risks of COVID-19 itself. That’s a good thing. It means we only have to take the risks with those patients who can most likely afford them.
On the flip side, why the hell we want to take huge, unnecessary risks to vaccinate children is beyond me, but I’ll save those arguments for another essay. Or look at my LAST essay. Those arguments are, in part, subtle “history of vaccination” propositions that would bog us down right now.
In contrast, Novavax doesn’t take those risks. It’s a more conservative vaccine. This is why it jumped to the top of my list. An entire class of risks – the genetic processing ones – were automatically removed. As a “nothing can go wrong or I’m likely DEAD” vaccine recipient, I appreciated my better chances with Novavax.
BUT as a “real” scientist, I am not just swayed by THEORY – I love the results of EXPERIMENT. Thus, when Pfizer’s clinical trial results came out, I was IMPRESSED by the excellent antibody levels and the almost minimal side-effects. Far from being an arm-burner like Moderna, Pfizer was looking to be much milder on short-term side-effects, with stronger adverse effects being downright RARE. The large population of test subjects also implied that a recoveree LIKE ME was likely in the study by accident – and NO deaths or severe reactions occurred – definitely a GOOD SIGN for my case.
This not only bode well for lower likelihood of some kind of lethal short-term reaction due to my recoveree status – the smart scientific position would be that lower short-term risk very likely reflects lower long-term risk – and this supposition is completely absent ANY “knowing” causative reason to connect them.
Thus, Novavax and Pfizer were at the top of my list. Things were looking GOOD to take a vaccine, even if I didn’t get an explicit study on safety in recoverees.
And THEN reality started to hit.
Yes – when millions of doses of a vaccine go out, there are going to be deaths and injuries. We have a system in place – let’s be honest – which tries to HIDE the minority reports on vaccine adverse events, in order to keep buy-in on vaccine compliance. That doesn’t mean people should stop getting vaccines, any more than reports on horrible vehicle accidents OR the “hiding” of such accidents on the back pages of newspapers, mean that we should stop driving.
Nevertheless, my scientific curiosity was piqued. We DO have COVID vaccine problems now, and MORE than seemed to have been revealed by the vaccine trials.
WHY NOT DO SOMETHING ABOUT THEM?
I repeat. Differently. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH BETTER VACCINES.
Taking stock of the many positives and negatives associated with THREE VACCINES which gained the most initial experience – Moderna, Pfizer, and Oxford/AstraZeneca – I noted three things, one from each.
Moderna – side effects sometimes REMARKABLY resembled COVID-19 itself – even up to SEVERITY.
Pfizer – nursing home patients were testing positive AFTER vaccination – some dying of COVID symptoms
AstraZeneca – hematological problems reminded me of another protein hemotoxin – snake venoms
I could go into deep details about these observations, but in TWO of the cases, it was VIDEOS where the “light-bulb” finally went on. So let’s look at some videos.
Moderna: Ben Stein’s vaccination experience
As I was listening to Ben, I was stunned. He was describing COVID-19 – at least from my perspective. This was not coincidence – this was SPIKE PROTEIN.
WHOA, NELLY!!!
Note that Ben is still “pro-vax” here – he’s just CAUTIONING people about REALITY.
Pfizer: Nursing Home CNA describes correlation of vaccination to later positive diagnosis and death
This man, a CNA in a nursing home, reported online what he had observed, amidst great personal anguish about “whistle-blowing”. He observed that he had protected his elderly patients for all of 2020, but when they finally got the Pfizer vaccine, many of them just started “testing positive” and DYING. He was NOT buying the management line that there was a super-spreader – if you listen to him, he’s fully contemptuous of the idea. He was CERTAIN it was the vaccine.
I agreed with this guy – a TRUSTED SCIENTIFIC REPORTER, in my opinion. His GUT was telling him that the chronology was one of correlation. He was very likely seeing in his mind a pattern in a delay over TIME, integrated over cases, that could only be explained by the vaccine itself. He was NOT accepting the management excuse of a “super-spreader” fortuitously infecting the vaccinated, to give that same result. THIS GUY is my kind of scientist. SKEPTICAL of ad hoc, contrived, politically correct explanations that don’t explain all the facts and observations in a clean, natural fashion.
AstraZeneca: Rare but serious clotting reactions are enough to evoke CONCERN from medical professionals
I think THESE DOCTORS in the following video represent my position extremely well – the problems with the AstraZeneca vaccine are RARE, but we KNOW there is a correlation, and it is our DUTY to stop and fix the problems, weighing in particular the relatively lower risks of COVID-19 itself in younger patients, where these events are occurring.
The difference between IGNORING the rare thrombocytopenia incidences and FIGURING THEM OUT is the difference between Stalinism and responsible popular government.
I truly admire these front line doctors for their SCIENTIFIC BALANCE. Frankly, I consider front line doctors to be scientists of the highest order, just like that CNA in the video above. PRACTICE is what matters – not DEGREES.
Now in this latter case, the AstraZeneca vaccine, I dragged in what I consider a very useful analogy to hemotoxic snake venoms, but I didn’t really see WHY this would be happening – until I found something that explains ALL of these problems.
I just didn’t realize I was holding an ACE.
The Macguffin – Reverse Transcription
In March of 2021, I reacquainted myself with a paper that I had noted when it came out, in December of 2020, but had not fully grasped the significance. The authors clearly knew that what they had found was a big deal, and worded the title appropriately, but even then, I don’t think they dared consider the possible deeper significance of their finding.
Nobody can FIRE ME from retirement, so I’m quite willing to say what needs to be said. Could it be wrong? Maybe. But if it’s RIGHT, there are issues that need to be dealt with. So let’s go there.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
Liguo Zhang, Alexsia Richards, Andrew Khalil, Emile Wogram, Haiting Ma, Richard A. Young, Rudolf Jaenisch doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516
I will refer to this paper at “the Jaenisch paper” – after the main author to whom correspondence is written – not because I don’t want to credit the fortunate and likely excellent first co-author Zhang in this instance, but because there is another paper I talk about all the time, dealing with masks, that I call “the Zhang paper“.
THAT one – the mask paper – in an embarrassingly good journal – is a piece of crap – some of the worst “political science” ever – designed to virtue signal to the CCP-DNC narrative of election-fraud-assisting masks, in utter contradiction to the very data presented by the authors.
The Jaenisch paper, in contrast, opens up a barn door that I am sure both industry and “in bed” government wants closed, Closed, CLOSED.
Stated very bluntly, the paper says that the virus behind COVID-19 actually “changes the genome” of victims – similarly to, though not exactly like, HIV.
You know – that OTHER disease for which Fauci was so interested in creating a vaccine.
And not only that – the COVID-19 virus does it enough to throw off those damn PCR tests that Kary Mullis warned us about for the exact same reason. In fact, the solution of that aspect of testing – the way “test-triggering fragments” just hung on and on and on in recoverees – is one of the BEAUTIES of the Jaenisch paper. The conclusions of the paper explain very neatly certain OBSERVATIONS and scientific conundrums that were first found by Korean scientists, who were very very persistent in proving that their COVID patients were NOT getting reinfected, as the fear-mongering American media “wanted”, but were still testing POSITIVE while being NON-INFECTIOUS.
Now we have a wonderful explanation. Excellent scientific work. THIS is why I signed up for science!
The THREE-TRILLION DOLLAR QUESTION that nobody wants to ask, however, is whether the genetic vaccines based on mRNA or DNA of the viral spike protein do the same thing – meaning get incorporated into the genomes of recipients. Well, do they?
Ever? Sometimes? Always? Or even just enough to make a difference?
It’s a great question! That deserves a CLOSE LOOK with MUCH SIDE-EYE.
I will say this. Even if these vaccines only get incorporated sometimes, that would make the “crazy people” yelling “OMG THESE CORONAVIRUS VACCINES ARE GENETIC MODIFICATION!” become suddenly – oddly – scandalously – CORRECT.
I find that incredibly ironic.
BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR. And then, there is EVEN MOAR STILL.
The Spike Must Flow
I had set the Jaenish paper aside in my mind in January 2021, as I was busy being pursued by the FBI as an “insurrectionist”, having wanted to see “fellow dissident scientist” Dr. Simone Gold speak at the Capitol Building on January 6, 2021. Rather luckily, I never found her, or realized where she was. Had I found her, I would have likely been arrested and all that nonsense, since she wandered, far too trustingly, into the interior of the Capitol building.
This old wolf, too wary to go into buildings – too old to play tug-of-war games – too injured to stand up to direct pepper spray – settled for singing the Star Spangled Banner at over 100 decibels with tens of thousands of patriots outside – which was an absolutely surreal experience.
But back to the story.
When I began seeing more and more vaccine problems by March of 2021, some of the possible answers seemed to point to the WHOLE SPIKE PROTEIN being the BAD ACTOR. The trouble was, I needed disease-producing levels of it. How might THAT be happening?
Look at Ben Stein. He was injected with only a small amount of COVID spike protein mRNA, but had disease like I did, when, in my case, the virus ran wild making BOTH spike protein AND more virus from it, in my cells.
The vaccine does NOT create any new virus. It does NOT have the full virus instructions. JUST the main one – the spike protein that provides a significant part of the viral shell.
Thus, the vaccine cannot create an EXPONENTIAL GROWTH of the spike protein, which the VIRUS does. The full virus creates more and more virus, meaning more and more spike protein, until something – immune response – shuts it all down.
The vaccine creates a few “fountains” of spike protein – basically “vaccine-infected” cells – but these get shut down as immunity builds. It never really gets out of control. Or at least, not normally.
So, for Ben Stein to have a powerful, disease-like experience, he needs cells that are cranking out far more spike protein than we would normally expect with the vaccine.
Well, if the INSTRUCTIONS for spike protein – in some people – got a bit upstream of just “slipping them into the print shop queue”, to where entire new print queues of spike protein and substantial, chimeric, problematic chunks thereof were being repeatedly ordered from DNA central operations, it would explain a whole lotta spike protein and associated chimeric junk being produced – more than anticipated.
And – I think I would be remiss if I didn’t consider the possibility that some of these bogus DNA instructions might be hard to shut down completely, thus providing an explanation of “long haulers” and “immunocompromised variant generators” beyond their known suffering of what can be rightly regarded as “simply” chronic damage from initial infection.
But let’s move on the to Pfizer nursing home case, and many other reported cases like it.
If we’re getting genetic incorporation of vaccine spike protein instructions at the DNA level by reverse transcription, like the Jaenish paper, perhaps in older individuals who are more susceptible to this problem, then it explains them testing positive later – and in some cases – if they can’t shut it off – DYING LATER.
Now – here is where KINETICS comes in. Kinetics is basically process flow rates. I talked about KINETICS in my LAST RANT on COVID-19, in which I began to put all this stuff together, but didn’t really put forth the totality of things until the comments section at the end of the post. I mentioned in the body of the post that the kinetics of viral interference didn’t seem to explain the nearly complete disappearance of flu while COVID was still significantly above herd immunity levels. It just felt to me that BOTH of these would shut down with greater similarity, if viral interference was the sole explanation. In that case, CDC lying to us about flu vaccine efficacy, understating the success to increase compliance, COMBINED with viral interference, provides a nicer (IMO) explanation of the observed kinetics.
Now, in the case of partial genetic incorporation, the kinetics of interest would be how fast the body shuts down spike protein production by cells without genetic incorporation, versus shutting down cells where there WAS genetic incorporation. If cells with significant production of spike protein due to genetic incorporation were not just sources of more spike protein and more symptoms, but also harder to shut down than “unincorporated” cells, and elderly people were increasingly subject to genetic incorporation with age, we might actually see the AGE-VACCINE DANGER relationship that is being seen in nursing homes, where the most elderly patients are at significantly greater and AGE-INCREASING risk from the mRNA vaccines – something we absolutely don’t want.
Are you starting to see why this explanation works for me?
Genetic incorporation of symptom-producing protein instructions by mRNA vaccines of the FULL SPIKE PROTEIN seems like a REAL WORKHORSE OF AN EXPLANATION.
And, if you’re following my reasoning, you can see that this can also explain the odd cases of thrombocytopenia in some younger patients getting the AstraZeneca vaccine.
In the AstraZeneca case, we would be seeing rare cases where spike protein production after genetic incorporation was just cranking away at levels reminiscent of hemotoxic envenomation by crotalids – or in English, snakebite, which is also (in certain snakes with certain proteins) characterized by thrombocytopenia.
I will tell you right now – there MAY be very similar cases in older patients – maybe not – but I suspect that such cases are less “systemically identifiable” in older patients where thrombosis is more “normal”, and will be more likely attributed to age and NOT the vaccine.
And here is the kicker. In all of these cases, because of the chimeric nature of the fragments noted in the Jaenisch paper, there is a certain RANDOMNESS which could be responsible for the random responses seen in different individuals and different vaccines, which by using significantly different mRNA vectors, may result in significantly different levels and exact circumstances of genetic incorporation in different individuals.
NOW – if it turns out that there IS genetic incorporation of vaccine-origin stabilized spike protein mRNA or DNA as genomic DNA, like the virus itself, then one of the first suspects for reverse transcriptase activity or induction thereof, would be the spike protein itself.
And THAT, my friends, opens up a REAL can of worms.
The Full Spike Protein Monty
Let me ask a really impertinent but really obvious question – something that Tucker Carlson is famous for.
Why are we vaccinating people with the WHOLE spike protein, or more precisely, stabilized analogs thereof?
OK – now I’m being a LAWYER here. I am asking questions to which I ALREADY know the answers, and in particular, the answers that Tony Fauci might give. Here is my argument on behalf of Fauci.
“We don’t really know EXACTLY where on the spike protein, might be the BEST place for antibodies to attack. Also, we don’t really have time to start guessing, when we can just use the whole thing. Most of the labs are modelling the whole molecule, and sharing data. It just makes sense that everybody sticks to the same model, so that any advances that one lab makes, can be quickly adopted by the other labs and researchers. If we begin using fragments of the spike protein, then results are going to be harder to interpret from lab to lab. There will be fragmentation of the science as well, and this will slow our response time tremendously. Comparison of results will be much more difficult. The timeline to a vaccine could be extended by months – even years. Maybe never……..”
See how that works? I would make a fantastic lying science bureaucrat – I know all the tricks already, because I used to negotiate compromises that result in the status quo in fake science in other ways.
Now – HERE is the superior counterargument that will LOSE because Tony Fauci is in control. For this argument, I’m a FRONT-LINE DOCTOR. Maybe I’m even Simone Gold, or one of the various doctors I followed back during the HCQ Wars.
“Yes, that’s all fine and good. But we are doctors, administering a VACCINE to patients. Adverse effects are real, and we want to minimize them. The spike protein is almost certainly the cause of much of the endothelial damage by this virus. Anything we can do to avert that damage is smart, including NOT using the full spike protein or analogs thereof. If we know the primary sites that antibodies need to attack, which we actually do, we can just use shorter peptide sequences or protein fragments constituting those sites. Modeling can make sure these fragments present the same, active, pre-fusion conformation. We can stabilize as needed to prevent immune enhancement, just like in the full spike protein. This shorter peptide approach has been successful in hepatitis vaccines. These peptides can be created quickly and formulated as vaccines in roughly the same time as the full protein. In fact, vaccine expert Winfried Stoecker has already done this, using the receptor binding domain of the spike protein, and creating a short peptide based on it. Since this technology is well-known, we don’t have to take any of the risks of messenger RNA or DNA technology. Nor do we have to use adenoviral vectors or new lipid nanodroplet technologies. Likewise, all of the advances in stabilizing pre-fusion conformation in the full spike protein can be used for the RBD peptide, so the risks of immune enhancement will be just as low. So, unless you can give us a reason to stick with the toxic spike protein, I’d say this is a no brainer.”
At least, that’s the way it looks to me.
Now, here are some interesting facts.
First, EVERYBODY is doing the full spike protein. The ONLY party that made a vaccine using less, was Prof. Stoecker, and he got in trouble for it, with the German government, because he wasn’t properly authorized, even though – well – normally he just does vaccine work and that’s that.
Second, you should note that – IF the spike protein has any reverse transcriptase (RT) activity, that activity would likely have been LOST by switching to a small peptide dropping most of the molecule.
Third, you should note that – by switching to a small peptide, there is no mRNA or DNA corresponding TO that peptide, so there is no chance it will be genetically incorporated.
By now, it is VERY clear to me, that the industry picked the vaccine technologies that it did, precisely because they were modern and untested, and they needed an “emergency” to get these technologies into use, in preparation for their big goal – actual gene therapy. But – AND LOGIC here – that does not preclude there being even MORE motivation here. The more I see this “event”, the more I see everybody getting bought in by SOME new aspect of the scam.
Using a more conservative approach would have been SAFER, but it would not have advanced the technologies that were groomed to be advanced. Even the Novavax protein-based vaccine, fairly conservative, tests the novel use of nanoparticles to assemble the pseudo-spike proteins into cell-infective starburst patterns. It, too, is full spike protein.
But again, THIS. Everybody is ALL about the full spike protein.
Let’s ask WHY.
A Feature – Not a Bug
Now – if the Jaenisch work is good – and I think it is – and if genetic incorporation of vaccine mRNA into genomic DNA also occurs – and I strongly suspect it does – and if the spike protein itself is responsible to at least SOME degree in causing genetic incorporation – which I also think is very likely – then I am of the opinion that Fauci knew exactly what he was doing in pushing mRNA and DNA vaccines that code for the full spike protein, and that he did so as a sneaky way to get a reverse transcription promoter into the human genome.
Why? I don’t really know. Not yet. But this whole thing just seems intentional in its ELEGANCE.
This is easily expressed in logical hacking terms. Fauci uploaded a stealthy FTP uploading tool into humanity’s genetic account. FIRST as a problem, with China’s help. THAN as a solution, with the industry’s help.
The idea of “uploading an uploader surreptitiously” is just elegant. It’s HACKING. Any person who ever had to “learn to code” has to admire it. And it’s doubly elegant by doing it TWICE.
Stated in biological terms:
Create a genetic vaccine for a same-same disease, both containing the genetic sequence of a reverse-transcription promoter, such as a reverse transcriptase, as a way of creating a persistent or at least consistently available presence of a reverse transcription activator in humans.
And the beauty of this scam, is that it’s “WHOOPS” played TWICE. VIRUS, then VACCINE.
Let’s enjoy it! Scenic route…….
FIRST the disease – OH, NO, LOOK WHAT BAT SOUP DID!
The ChiComs are masters of psychology on Americans. First they whip up the cultural WTF.
THEN they whip up the OTHER side of Americans saying “don’t hate on Asian cultural differences!”
THEN they pull the whole offering back, with everybody left high and dry on CCP zoonotic transfer garbage narratives, minus “bat soup”, but including pangolin “look squirrels”, when the REALITY is that humanized animal models are almost all that is actually used for this kind of viral research any more (thanks to Mary Morse for this fantastic point).
Wuhan lab. Put ALL your chips on it.
MASTERFUL MANIPULATION, and many American academic scientists fell for it like soldiers on leave in a brothel district.
THEN the cure – the vaccine – which uses the SAME genetics to get MOAR of the uploader installed in MOAR people.
And if they get caught….”OMG, DID WE DO THAT? WE JUST FOLLOWED THE SCIENCE AND THE DISEASE! FULL SPIKE PROTEIN FOR THE WIN! IT’S *** SCIENCE *** !!!”
Introduction You have GOT to see the video I’m going to show you. It’s not just what they’re talking about. It’s WHERE IT LEADS. Most of the people who watch Rand Paul go after Fauci here, are concentrating on MASKS, because that is the TOP LAYER of the argument. But THAT is the small potatoes. …
Something is going on here, and it seems too purposeful to be mere incompetence.
SO – Does Wolf Take the Faucipox Vaccine?
Now – I’m gonna tell you – CRISPR-Cas9 vaccines are coming, and THOSE are straight-up genetic engineering. Save some ammunition for that fight. But right now, I think it’s worth bringing up some PRETTY TOUGH QUESTIONS about the current vaccines.
Simply stated – aren’t things with reverse transcription activity a RISK, like HIV, and why would we court that risk in a SOLUTION like a vaccine?
And what’s with all the LIES to keep people from noticing that the VACCINE causes positive tests in recipients, “because spike protein, sequences, PCR, and [COUGH] maybe a little incorporation”.
C’mon. This is so obvious now, it’s PAINFUL. CDC is not even looking foolish. They know this stuff isn’t the disease – it’s the vaccines. They’re LYING.
Sheesh. The whole thing is an outrage.
So. Am I going to take one of the current vaccines?
Not if I think there is a reverse transcription activator coded for in the mRNA or DNA, or even if it’s just in there as PROTEIN.
I’m quite good with my natural immunity, which sadly may ALREADY include some uploading of the uploader. I have no idea if I have any genetic incorporation from the virus already, but if I do, I know exactly where any future positive PCR test is coming from.
Anyway, thank you, Kary. You were right all along. They ABUSED your work.
You have GOT to see the video I’m going to show you.
It’s not just what they’re talking about. It’s WHERE IT LEADS.
Most of the people who watch Rand Paul go after Fauci here, are concentrating on MASKS, because that is the TOP LAYER of the argument. But THAT is the small potatoes.
Rand Paul distracted Fauci to defend masks, while introducing DEVASTATING truth about variants and immunity.
Rand was not only opening up basic questions about what we should be doing in terms of allowing the immune to “bring us back to normal” in terms of wearing or not wearing masks – he exposed a SCAM being pulled by the left, in which they NEED to push humanity to a Marek’s Disease dilemma, as part of forced dependence on government, and thus to lock in socialism. I will explain that part below.
Because COVID-19 is constantly mutating, AS IT HAS FROM THE VERY BEGINNING, variants are naturally causing the new infections, AS THEY HAVE FROM THE VERY BEGINNING – important – AS THEY HAVE FROM THE VERY BEGINNING – but Rand Paul is showing a deep truth of the results that Fauci is trying to hide – that “of course variants take over” – but that does not mean that people who have been vaccinated or recovered from EARLIER VERSIONS of the virus don’t have real immunity that should be letting them return to their normal lives. Just as we always used to do, and always did, with all other colds and flu.
See? It basically boils down to NORMAL vs. WEIRD NEW UNNECESSARY NORMAL.
You can see Fauci RUNNING from this and DISSEMBLING in every possible “smart” way.
Indeed, Rand Paul is hinting at the truth, and you can see Fauci hiding it. The disease seems to be becoming a NORMAL COLD AND FLU BUG to the vaccinated and recovered, once it is no longer novel. And Fauci absolutely CANNOT SAY THAT. He has to try to make us see the glass half empty, by sleight of hand, to make us focus on the SCARY VARIANTS and not the CURED PEOPLE.
It is SO SLICK. You can see that little MAFIA TWERP trying to evade, but no – he CANNOT.
Because YES – we AS A WHOLE are becoming immune, and the disease is no longer a huge threat – most of all to those who have recovered or been vaccinated.
That is, as long as we don’t do something STUPID like making it more virulent – like we did with Marek’s Disease.
And I’m pushing it even beyond THAT, because it seems to me that Geert Vanden Bossche is correct about the possibility of a Marek’s Disease outcome. It sure looks like the globonazis are “accidentally” doing the wrong thing – which will end up making all humans addicted to a vaccine by PUSHING the variants to greater infectiousness and virulence by the very act of mass vaccination using inefficient vaccines.
In this open letter I am appealing to the @WHO and all stakeholders involved, no matter their conviction, to immediately declare such action as THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY OF INTERNATIONAL CONCERN. Please read and share: https://t.co/0Fupw9JInP#COVID19pic.twitter.com/I24mSjpVKM
Only I’m saying it’s not accidental. I’m saying that they want us REALLY dependent on the vaccine (see Marek’s Disease), but to get there we have to FAKE IT to make people take the vaccine for a relatively harmless pathogen NOW.
Which is to say, Aubergine’s razor.
Are you with me?
Maybe not?
OK – there is a lot to unpack there.
Let’s START from the beginning.
Rand Paul Nails Fauci
This is a great link with a TRANSCRIPT right here. If you want to READ the exchange, go there.
First, listen to Fauci start off with “I don’t understand….” – LIAR. Fauci immediately tries to lead away from the IMMUNE to the UNINFECTED.
This is extremely disingenuous. You can tell exactly what Fauci doesn’t want to do. He does not want any exceptions in the policy. He wants people obeying mandates.
This is where, as a recoveree FORCED to wear a mask DESPITE both IMMUNITY and HYPOXIA, I am SO PISSED OFF at all these mask martinets with their muzzle mandates.
In their ZEAL to vaccinate, people like me have been THROWN UNDER THE BUS.
So Fauci pretends to not understand. MAMET PRINCIPLE AGAIN.
So what does Fauci do? Rather than answer the question – “WHAT STUDIES CAN YOU CITE?” – which of course he cannot do – he THROWS A STRAWMAN at Rand Paul, and says “the studies you are talking about…” – WAIT A MINUTE – what studies is Rand talking about? He’s NOT. He’s asking YOU, Fauci, for studies in support of YOUR recommendations.
Then Fauci tries to shut up Rand Paul – gets him to back off a bit – and pivots back to SCARY VARIANTS, and the South African results from the Johnson+Johnson trials – with which I’m actually familiar.
Rand Paul actually NAILS Fauci on something I missed.
The J+J results tested people for antibodies – NOT CLINICAL SICKNESS. This is KEY. This is absolutely freaking KEY. We tend to forget that we MEASURE what we ACTUALLY MEASURE – not what we often THINK we’re measuring.
The J+J serological results, obtained in the course of vaccine trials, looked at whether people had antibodies to different variants at various stages in the testing, and included BOTH vaccine and placebo groups. Novavax also tested in South Africa, and also got interesting results. But the fact is, these were not tests for disease – they were tests for ANTIBODIES. And the results Fauci is talking about were BYPRODUCTS of the study. They weren’t even the POINT of the study.
This just blows up everything Fauci is saying.
Fauci is a hypocrite and a jerk. One the one hand, he DISMISSES clinical testing cases in hospitals for hydroxychloroquine, where LOGIC – PURE LOGIC – can tell you that something is WORKING FOR TREATING DISEASE – because THAT is what you’re actually measuring – but Fauci will dismiss it as not being “placebo, double-blind”.
Or worse still, Fauci ignored the “Lancetgate effect” – a statistical proof of DEATH on a societal scale when HCQ was withdrawn – showing the BENEFIT of hydroxychloroquine on a NATIONAL SCALE.
Yeah. Fauci loves statistics on a tiny, ancillary, and potentially mistaken scale, but when it’s BIG and STARK and says the wrong thing – well – then he just IGNORES them.
So what we’re talking about Fauci ignoring are studies of REAL DISEASE – not just antibodies in the blood – and LOGIC is fully operant on the results – but that’s no good for Fauci because “no placebo” and “not double-blind”.
BUT YET – here we see Fauci talking about MERE HANDFULS OF PEOPLE GETTING ANTIBODIES to the new South African variant, both having HAD the prior version, and NOT having had any prior version. That’s all it was. A mere BLIP in a much larger population of tested people.
But that is ALL YOU MEASURED – antibodies in people who walked in the door – and yet Fauci EXTRAPOLATES THIS to disease, and “no protection”.
And it LITERALLY does NOT MEAN THAT. It only means what people were tested for. ANTIBODIES. It means that getting new antibodies happens, when exposed to a new version, whether you had an old version or not.
WHOOPEE!
Now I see why people don’t think much of Fauci. He sees PROCESS and BUREAUCRACY as TRUTH. He doesn’t see the big picture – STOPPING DISEASE. Yet Rand Paul does.
Wow. Just blown away. Mikovits is right. This guy is a PROBLEM.
MOVING ON.
So here’s what happens next. Rand Paul pushes the fact that we have NO hospitalizations or deaths for people who have recovered or been vaccinated. He confronts Fauci with this. What does Fauci do? He IGNORES the question – IGNORES the challenge – and sticks to “you’re not listening” and “variants and wild type”.
Just as an aside, Fauci is helping his ChiCom buddies by calling the original version “wild type”, when it was anything but “wild”, but THAT is Fauci to the core. Evil little RAT. Bat soup, Fauci! BAT SOUP! You believe that crap?
Buzz off, Fauci, you little demon! LOL. Good grief, I hate people who abuse science like this evil gnome.
Sorry – the guy just makes me burn. “Wild Type”! Bullshit! This thing started mutating so fast, it was wild for about 5 people.
SPIT!
So Rand Paul hits Fauci AGAIN with no significant hospitalization or death, and Fauci AGAIN circles back to variants, and says we have “no variants in this country”.
Now THAT is a flat out lie. FLAT. OUT. LIE.
There is an AWESOME website called NEXTSTRAIN.ORG which has phenomenal analysis of the mutations of viruses, and has been on top of COVID-19 coronavirus mutations from the very beginning.
And I mean VERY beginning.
The site is very up-to-date as well. For example, here is the evolution of SARS-COV-2 as of this very moment:
I was looking at Nextstrain from the VERY beginning of this thing. There were country variants ALL OVER the world IMMEDIATELY, and they were spreading to other countries as fast as PEOPLE WERE.
Let’s look at the situation right now. We don’t have variants?
YOU LIE!
This is what Fauci looks like when he lies. Keep it for reference.
And this is what he’s lying about.
Oh, but it gets better – look how variants were emerging from the very beginning:
So no – do NOT tell me that we don’t have any variants, Tony Fauci, you MEALY-MOUTHED GARDEN GNOME.
At that point, Rand Paul just launches into a barrage of truth. JUST LISTEN TO HIM. He is so spot on with the idea of giving people a REWARD for getting the vaccine.
Now – some Democrat chickie-poo comes in and tries to rescue Fauci – who does his best to lie his way out, saying that Rand Paul’s statements are only true about the “wild type” and not the variants. We may get into the possibility that the first “allegedly stronger variant” showing up in South Africa……
…..may be a product of more ChiCom shenanigans, as a propaganda ASSIST to the AmeriCommies and the COVID COMMIES such as Fauci – but let’s just leave that possibility aside for now.
Fauci simply cannot consider letting off on what appear to be IMAGINARY lack of protections of the recovered and vaccinated, even though there is no evidence to suggest that they are not actually protected.
WHY? Why persist in keeping people fearful, and ready for that next vaccine?
I believe it’s because they have a reason.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche’s Warning
Here is the text of his letter which you saw on Twitter above.
I personally like his video better – this interview – but it’s a long listen.
https://youtu.be/YtHfI00D_s4
Now – this guy does not spell out the possibility that we could end up with a situation EXACTLY like Marek’s Disease – but others have, because that is ONE of the “better” outcomes of what GVB is talking about.
Yeah – it could be WORSE than Marek’s Disease. But THAT is bad enough.
Here is the internet explanation of the “better” Marek’s outcome, where we are ALL dependent on a vaccine we would not have needed if we HADN’T over-vaccinated – but at least the vaccine keeps us from dying.
Here is the excellent Wikipedia description of that disease.
So – are you feeling a bit of overload at this point?
I suggest getting a drink, coming back, and listening to the NEXT GUY.
Del Bigtree’s Antibody Explainer
I am not actually a fan of this guy – but JUST because of his wonderful “football playbook” method of explaining Geert Vanden Bossche’s point about the virtue of general antibodies over specific antibodies under certain circumstances, I really have to recommend watching this.
Del Bigtree has followed this subject (vaccines for a while, and while he’s generally on the “opposite side” from me (with Del being generally opposed to vaccines), he clearly understands what GVB is saying, and makes it very easy to understand.
Between Rand Paul’s excellent questions about WHEN we should call “OVER” an overreaction to a “novel cold and flu” that was masqueraded to us as a pandemic to falsely elect Joe Biden…..
Between Anthony Fauci’s dissembling, his evasions, and his flat-out lies, to support policies which have only the trickiest and most misleading grounding in science or reality….
Between Geert Vanden Bossche’s disturbingly simple question of whether our vaccines are actually DRIVING the evolution of new and potentially increasingly dangerous variants of COVID-19…..
And between Wolf Moon’s suspicion that the “South African variant” may actually be the product of more perfectly timed Chinese bio-adventurism…..
It would behoove us to ask whether we are on the right track with mass vaccination of a NEW FLU.
Because if we’re NOT on the right track, then “my vaccine” may not kill grandma – but it could very well kill the grandkids.
And that’s not nice.
W
Title: CAREY TREATMENT, THE ¥ Pers: COBURN, JAMES / AUBREY, SKYE ¥ Year: 1972 ¥ Dir: EDWARDS, BLAKE ¥ Ref: CAR019AF ¥ Credit: [ MGM / THE KOBAL COLLECTION ]
I had just been thinking about matters of DC and the likelihood that President Trump already invoked the Insurrection Act some time after the Stolen Election – and probably much sooner than we realized – when THIS NEW INFORMATION came to my attention.
Hold off on viewing it, until I explain this a bit more.
This is an hour-long podcast by Mike Adams of Natural News.
Mike was personally kicked off Twitter and Facebook by the gelatinous monster Adam Schiff.
InfoWars (Alex Jones) and Natural News (Mike Adams) were both the FIRST and PRIMARY targets of the BEGINNING of the social media censorship which we are ALL experiencing now.
“Vaccine misinformation” was a pretext for Schiff to force / enable the social media TYRANTS to remove Mike Adams, in my opinion. But it was MUCH BIGGER than coronavirus vaccines. Much bigger than vaccines in general. Much bigger than any of that.
It was about NOW.
Mike Adams is, in my opinion, one of the best scientists out there – willing to stand up to the politically forced scientific opinions which theoretically don’t exist, but which in fact DOMINATE the most contentious parts of science – particularly where MONEY and POWER intersect.
My first indication that this guy had real chops was his acoustic analysis of the bullet audio from crowd videos of the Las Vegas shootings. When even the Las Vegas Sheriff and Chief of Police could not speak freely, under the hawk-like watch of the FBI, sticking to a single-shooter theory MASSIVELY contradicted and discredited by witnesses, and while even FBI scientists failed to provide even the slightest refutation other than “health nut smears”, Mike Adams VALIDATED the first shooter and PROVED A SECOND by an impressively SIMPLE and easily explained audio analysis.
Sadly, the video has been utterly scrubbed from the internet, but – well – copies do exist, let’s just say! Maybe they will find their way back to us when Silicon Valley is dealt with vis-a-vis the FIRST AMENDMENT.
ANYWAY, now we come to the issue at hand. “Somebody” just came to Mike Adams and told him things which blew him away. Mike is only able to HINT at these things for now, but they apparently are HUGE.
It is more by reading between the LINES of what Mike says that you will get a clearer picture of WHO came to him, WHY they came to him, WHAT they told him, and more.
WHEN and WHERE are more certain.
Mike says that we need to STAY HOME on January 19 and 20.
DO NOT go to Washington, DC.
DO NOT go to your state capitols.
Now – I don’t want to influence your perceptions of the video. I want you to watch it NOW.
You don’t have to watch much – Mike puts the IMPORTANT STUFF right up front, to make sure you get the information. You don’t have to watch more than 15 minutes to get what I want to discuss.
Here it is again:
Here is the page URL, if the embedded video gives you any trouble:
To me it is completely clear WHO came to Mike Adams – somebody who represents authorities that will be providing him with AUTHORITATIVE INFORMATION and thus bypassing the TREASON MEDIA. Mike is careful not to say who came to him, but whoever they are, they have some kind of significant authority, IMO.
It is also clear to me that WHY these authorities came to Mike – because his podcast audience now exceeds some limit which makes it a useful channel to reach people – AND Mike is a known patriot, whether people agree with his views on health matters and medicine or not.
WHAT exactly they told him, is almost certainly interesting to the point of being AMAZING. Mike summed it up by saying “Lin Wood is right” – and that he (Mike) has been converted from a “Lin Wood skeptic” to a “Lin Wood believer”.
You think the President’s LAWYER on the ELECTION might have to be READ IN on the most sensitive information about the ELECTION? Make sense NOW?
NOW – if you keep listening to the podcast, you will hear “echoes of Q”, and Mike will admit that he was not a “Q follower”, but that much of what Q told us is, surprisingly to him, TRUE.
Yeah.
If it’s not all becoming clear now, let the comments below help you!
The last couple of days, there has been SO MUCH information coming to the fore that it’s easy for some essential reading to get lost in the multiple pages of the dailies.
So, to be sure a handful of items – a couple thread readers and one graphic that Wolf has been reposting as many times as humanly possible – are seen by as many eyes as possible, I’m stashing them on a stand alone post.
If this has been posted, I apologize. A thread by Duane Cates, a.k.a. Soulwar, without the pics.
Thread: An article by @DBCopa that lays out WHY the Texas SCOTUS Case is a Game Changer & what President Trump was angling for from the beginning= dbcoparanis.medium.com/the-texas-2020…
SCOTUS would have to review THE EVIDENCE since no lower Court has done so.
DO YOU SEE IT YET?
Trump will reveal the most damning evidence during SCOTUS proceedings NOT included in any revealed affidavits to the lower Courts as it’s not required to submit ALL evidence, just what you believe is sufficient to prove the Case.
President Trump intended SCOTUS to be his Battlefield all along & that Texas would have standing whereas, incredibly, the sitting President who was cheated did not.
The PROOF BOMBS Trump’s going to reveal have not yet been reviewed by ANYONE outside of his Team & I must stress…
…none of the State Cases required Trump’s Team to submit ALL of their evidence for that Case. They submitted compelling affidavits they KNEW the Judges would ignore. My thinking is Trump has some Thermonuclear PROOF BOMBS that he’s been waiting to drop since Nov. 3rd
Here’s just one I believe will be presented to SCOTUS=threadreaderapp.com/thread/1335557…
Yes, it’s just ONE Tabulation Machine in One County THAT’S BEEN ADMITTED TO.
How many more Machines does the Trump Team have possession of?
How many have the same or similar algorithm?
Trump couldn’t prevent THE STEAL, but he could prepare to ANSWER it.
It’s now clear WHY Biden’s campaign was non-existent & WHY the Democrats didn’t fight ACB’s nomination to SCOTUS=they intended to CHEAT & INSTALL Biden then pack the Supreme Court.
So Trump TRAPPED them all.
So because of what happened on Nov. 3rd (The CHEAT & it’s aftermath) we have been smashed by WAVES of Gaslighting #FakeNews as the MSM desperately tries to FORCE millions of Americans accept our NU NORMAL.
As the DC Democrats hide under their Beds.
THEY KNOW WHAT’S COMING.
The MSM & Social Media Giants are clearly not as politically savvy as the Swamp Creatures.
The Charade they are demanding everyone participate in is looking more & more bizarre as President-Elect Doddering Puppet obliviously makes cabinet appointments in La-La Land.
People are STILL THINKING TOO SMALL.
This isn’t about TRUMP!
This is about DESTROYING A WORLD the Enemies of America, both Foreign & Domestic built to RULE & ABUSE us.
Trump is going to PEEL their corruption like a rotten, stinking Onion.
ALL OF IT.
Know what that means?
The relentless pressure of the Social Media to conform to CRITICAL RACE THEORY over the past 15 years, the linking of ANYTHING pro-American SPIRIT to WHITE SUPREMACY, the Pandemic, the RIOTS & Lockdowns all have ONE ORIGIN.
HAVE YOU FIGURED IT OUT YET?
China IS at WAR with us.
This is HOW the Fourth Estate was turned into a Fifth Column against our very Republic.
This is HOW our children’s education was warped into indoctrination.
Our Courts became Bastions of Judicial Activism always protecting unconstitutional Leftism while swinging HARD vs the Right
Trump isn’t positioning himself to win just a 2nd Term we all want, he’s FIGHTING to restore our Republic by positioning THE ENEMY to the Time & Place of their UTTER DESTRUCTION.
He’s used their penchant for cheating to SET THEM UP.
The DC Democrats realized this TOO LATE.
The MORONS in the Legacy & Social Media are “soldiering on” completely unaware what Trump is about to drop on them.
When you realize how audacious, the SCOPE of where Trump is going to go with this, your jaw will hit the floor.
DEMOCRATS WERE CHEATING FOR YEARS with DOMINION.
All of the Left’s most carefully & stealthily prepared schemes that brought OUR Republic to the brink of it’s irreparable loss are going to come to nothing.
America WILL restore our Electoral System.
We WILL restore our Education System & Culture.
NOT overnight….
because YOU are going to have to FIGHT your Fellow MARXIST Americans to do it.
& they WILL fight you every step of the way.
They are determined to destroy the Republic,
HOW DETERMINED ARE YOU TO RECOVER IT?
The Enemies of America managed to put down Marxist ROOTS.
ACCEPT IT.r w
President Trump does have a Plan to recover America.
You won’t recognize America by 2025 & you’ll be THRILLED.
BUT full recovery will take at least a decade.
Which means Trump’s successor will be CRITICAL.
The CCP INFLUENCE in the GOP was partially successful in Trump’s 1st Term,
The REMOVAL of CCP Influence in the GOP!
or did you think those 40+ GOP Politicians who decided SUDDENLY to retire was just a coincidence?
The PURGE of the DNC’s CCP isn’t going to be VOLUNTARY.
So be it.
Let me be clear=I don’t hate Foreigners.
I HATE Foreigners conspiring to destroy my Country.
Because the Torch of LADY LIBERTY troubles their DARK Dreams of Empire & Tyranny.
Their peoples SEE our amazing quality of life & success.
So rather than emulate that success they want to burn America to the ground.
“Freedom is a LIE.”
They want to “Solve” their America PROBLEM.
President Trump is about to solve their HUMANITY PROBLEM.
DECISIVELY.
The World WILL remember his name.
In WONDER.
& as for those that tried to stop him?
Forgotten, because the Universe is a MERITOCRACY.
(You Marxist Bitches)
/end
And then posted by GrandmainTX, this from Michelle Malkin:
THREAD: As FDA hearing on emergency use authorization for COVID vaccines takes place in DC this a.m., I will summarize the 3 installments of my #COVIDGATE series on corruption of vaccine clinical trials. We must not simply think and do as we’re told. /1
Dr. Fauci: America has an “independent spirit” but now is the time “to do what you’re told” pic.twitter.com/t7uY4nHyGk
#COVIDGATE Part One unpacks Moderna & Pfizer’s clinical trial-by-press-release strategy of conditioning Americans to parrot the “more than 90%” or “94.5% effective” soundbites without understanding what the trials actually measured. unz.com/mmalkin/covidg…
Pfizer enrolled 43,538, of whom 94 (about .2 of 1%) were identified as having COVID. Moderna included 30,000+, of whom 95 (about .3 of 1%) categorized as having COVID. In other words: Vaccine tested on those at incredibly low risk, not only vaccinated but also unvaccinated. /3
BMJ notes none of the trials “are designed to detect reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.” /4
Moderna’s chief medical officer told BMJ its trial lacks adequate statistical power to assess severe outcomes. COVID hospital admissions/deaths “are simply too uncommon…for an effective vaccine to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of 30k people. /5
“The same is true of ability to save lives or prevent transmission: the trials are not designed to find out.” Bottom line: COVID-19 is too rare & too benign to permit analysis of exactly the kind of serious health outcomes that most Americans believe the vaccine will “cure.” /6
#BigPharma propagandists on both the Left & Right who tell you the vaccine prevents transmission of the virus, when the trial protocols measure no such thing, are straight up lying to you. TAKE NOTE of who is lying.
The vaccine is 95% effective in preventing you from getting the virus, and also mitigates the severity of the disease. 99% of those who actually get covid-19 will survive. pic.twitter.com/Ep8tMBG311
BMJ also noted “lab confirmed infections even w/only mild symptoms qualify as meeting primary endpoint definition.” Mere cough & positive PCR test qualify as positive COVID cases in Moderna/Pfizer. “Efficacy” based on a measly 150-160 such “events” regardless of severity. /8 Big Pharma can’t say how long alleged protection of COVID-19 vaccines will last.
Can’t tell you about synergistic effects with other vaccines.
Can’t tell you about long-term side effects.
Don’t forget: Vax-makers are IMMUNE from liability!
/9
Vaccinating billions to prevent a disease w/99% survival rate for people under 70, all based on clinical trial efficacy analysis of less than 200 COVID-19 cases involving patients w/coughs & unreliable PCR tests, is not triumph of science. It’s corruption of science. /10
Let’s move on to #COVIDGATE PART 2: Clinical Trials and Crusader Bias. The “gold standard” of randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials has been undermined by zealots & blabbermouths enrolled in the COVID vaccine research experiments. /11
Unlike any other modern clinical trial, COVID vaxx trials attracted legion of crusaders w/pro-vaxx bias. Many of them are advocacy media who turned volunteer stints into splashy, self-aggrandizing op-eds. Like this one from leftist @MollyJongFast :
I tallied at least a dozen such pieces downplaying vax side effects & promoting universal jabs. Jong-Fast wrote that a doctor involved in her trial divulged to her that “people had so few symptoms they thought they were in placebo arm of study.” That’s unethical disclosure. /14
Randomized, placebo-controlled & double-blind means each person has equal chance of receiving vaccine or placebo. Double-blind means neither volunteers nor trial investigators know which group received which shots (although administrators of shots know who’s getting what). /15
Blinding prevents patients’ beliefs about treatment from influencing study outcome & prevents investigators from revealing clues about which treatment subjects receive. But crusader bias demonstrated by media enrollees & other general public volunteers taints the trials. /16
I obtained screenshots of social media posts from dozens of self-identified Moderna & Pfizer trial volunteers unblinding themselves while experiments ongoing. I’ve submitted 20 to FDA as part of public comment process on EUA & offered to share all of them w/ agency. /17
Volunteers discussed/posted antibody test results, shared symptoms & plotted how to drop out of trials and enroll in new ones if they suspected they didn’t get the vaccine. /18
One woman told a Facebook group that her shot during Pfizer vaccine trial “was covered in a bunch of tape, but the part I could see was dark.” A man responded by posting a picture of his vial, partially covered in tape with a dark liquid visible. /19
Another volunteer, J.D.T., posted on Facebook that “someone working at study site” told him “the placebo and the vaccine are different colors.” This a brazen breach of protocol and ethics. Anyone who purports to be for “sound science” should be alarmed. /20
2 trial volunteers discussed being able to guess if they got vaccine based on whether administrator rushed into room to inject them. “The vaccine has to remain at a certain temp so once ready, it has to go. Pays to ask a lot of questions,” 1 advised the other. /21
Look at this @US_FDA – Pathologist enrolled in @moderna_tx vax trial posted on Facebook that she got tested during trial, advised others where to get tested & offered to give other trial volunteers antibody test from her private lab! Double-blind protection obliterated. /22
When 1 volunteer expressed concern antibody testing was “kind of ‘cheating’” & “against rules of the study,” another argued “My trial site said go for it. There is nothing in the legal documentation that says you cannot.” Another gave in to peer pressure & got tested.
/23
SCIENCE: Systematic review of meta-analyses looked at avg bias associated w/reported methodological aspects of RCTs: Lack of/unclear double blinding was associated w/23% exaggeration of intervention effect estimates in trials w/ subjective outcomes. /24
Now: #COVIDGATE PART 3: Attack on Informed Consent. It matters more than ever because we are entering most coercive era of medical tyranny in human history. Can you really offer voluntary & thorough consent at “warp speed” with a gun to your head? /25
In case you need a primer on the history of informed consent requirements in the U.S., here’s an overview. Our right to self-determination cannot be protected if doctors fail to disclose all risks of treatments. Same holds true in medical research.
dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/hand… /26 The unthinking surrender of our autonomy to global pandemic blackmailers who will pre-condition travel, work, education & LIFE itself on COVID vaccination is horrific. The circumventing of parental authority over minors is even more evil==> /27
You probably didn’t hear about it, but responsible experts warn us that *adult* COVID vaccine trial volunteers were inadequately told of risks that the shots “could worsen disease.” And we expect minors to be able to offer “informed consent?!”
Burying adverse effects in fine print is SOP for #BigPharma. It’s exactly what they’ll do w/package inserts for the shots, too. Speaking of which, have you seen FDA’s draft list of “adverse event outcomes” for COVID-19 vaccines? Get informed.
Public health-industrial complex is pushing hard to sabotage parental authority over children. AMA pimping “model legislation” to give kids under 12 “ability to consent for their own vaccines,” while *ADULTS* have nowhere near truly INFORMED CONSENT! /32
ama-assn.org/system/files/2…REMINDER: National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program’s payouts to vaccine-injured total more than $4.4 billion since 1989. Here are petition & compensation data. Will minors get a chance to review before granting “informed consent!?”
Let’s talk more about adverse outcomes. Crusader volunteers are downplaying side effects or telling people they need to suck it up for the greater good, like this nurse volunteer in the Pfizer trials making the media rounds… businessinsider.com/nurse-got-covi…
Pfizer/Moderna volunteers took to Facebook to gossip about side effects, incl high fever, being “unable to lift anything,” vertigo, high BP, arm pain for weeks, feeling “beaten with a baseball bat” & hours-long vomiting. “I’d be worried about elderly/weak people,” one mused.
/35
One side effect you may have read about is allergic reactions, which vax-makers couldn’t bury. Pfizer/BioNTech warned COVID shots shouldn’t be given to people w/history of allergies after 2 UK health care workers suffered symptoms following jabs.
I urge every American to read 2 petitions by Wodarg, @MichaelYeadon3, et al to European & US FDA officials calling for suspension of all COVID-19 clinical trials. They raise red flags re. unreliable PCR tests & risks of ADE, allergies & infertility.
/38 Petitioners warn about 2 additives in Pfizer vaccine: polyethylene glycol (against which 70% of people produce antibodies that could provoke “allergic, potentially deadly reactions”) & mNeonGreen (bioluminescent derived from marine invertebrate “of unknown antigenicity”). /39
Women, pay attention! @MichaelYeadon3 et al also warn of potential fertility-specific risks involving antibodies against “spike proteins” that could disrupt development of placenta. “Unclear” what if any warnings vax-makers have given. /40
mRNA vaccines are totally untested in general population. Mainstream scientists & others are asking serious questions about whether they will INCREASE long-term risk of autoimmune disease. The discussion is widespread on social media despite censors.
/41 For those with allergies who want more info on polyethylene glycol in COVID vaccines, see here: “treating patients who have acquired anti-PEG antibodies…results in…low drug efficacy, hypersensitivity &…life-threatening side effects.”
For those who want more info on antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), see this thread. There’s disagreement on how big, if any, a problem it is/will be. Bottom line: NOBODY KNOWS because long-term clinical trial data is lacking. #InformedConsent
A thread on antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in #coronaviruses. While developing vaccines, treating patients with convalescent plasma, and considering immunity passports, we must first understand the complex role of antibodies in #SARS, #MERS and #COVID19. (1/13)
Experts treat “positive results from PCR-based tests for COVID-19 as if they are completely reliable…In fact, however, false positives occur in PCR tests for COVID-19 often enough to be a significant problem.”
To simplify: A test with a low false positive rate can result in more false positives than true positives if the disease being tested (like COVID-19) is rare. If you don’t know why, read up on the false positive paradox: puzzlewocky.com/paradoxes/the-… /47
MUST WATCH Former Pfizer top researcher @MichaelYeadon3 : “Cease mass testing of the mostly well population immediately…for God’s sake don’t increase number of tests. It’s a pathology all its own which must be stamped out by right-thinking people.”
Do your own homework. Here are links to the Pfizer and Moderna clinical trial protocols. How can you give #InformedConsent if you DON’T inform yourselves?
As of 3:30pm Eastern, the FDA hearing on emergency use authorization of Pfizer COVID vaccine that started this morning at 9am is still ongoing. Q&A happening. Vote scheduled after discussion.
There’s more at the Thread Reader including a lot of images of the Facebook group discussions.
Linda – I believe this is related to that leak from the whistleblower that Dep Pat told us about – the one that alleged two adulterants were being added to the Moderna vaccine to cause sterility in female offspring of recipients:
(1) mRNA for two mutant versions of reproductive proteins, which cause sterility
(2) a component to induce reverse transcription (like HIV reverse transcriptase) to upload the genetic misinformation to the genome in the gonads of the recipient, to be passed on to female offspring and make them sterile.
It sounds to me like this supposedly legitimate HIV inclusion is a cover story which is basically failing, not because people understand the deeper problem, but because HIV activity of any kind is inherently scary, and people are worried.
These are items that really do need to be seen by as many people as possible.
Give them nothing but one more day to rue, and the wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Remain CIVIL and possibly even GENTEEL.
Today we have FOUR SHORT LESSONS in politically incorrect WOLFTHINK.
Watch The Water
One of the beautiful things that the Q team did, as part of not only its “comms”, but also its psy-opping, and its deniability, was to communicate to us in double, triple, and higher entendres. It was poetry, which not only made it CUNNING, but also ATTRACTIVE, INSPIRING, and even BEAUTIFUL.
Sure, SOME people will “read things in” wrongly, or too little, or too much, but overall, SOME will figure out TRUE THINGS, and what they figure out will spread.
The GENIUS of the COMMS is a proof unto itself.
I cannot tell you if Q originally intended for us to “get” WATER ISLAND as a sly tip in “WATCH THE WATER”, but OMG – it’s a GOLD MINE, intended or not.
Thanks to ValCur, who is NOT ValJar, I researched a photo and was led to THIS ARTICLE:
I simply CANNOT recommend this article highly enough.
This is real corruption, and the article both explains it, and EXCUSES IT.
This article is trying to IMMUNIZE Biden against damage from not just this story, but also the deeper parts of the scandal, by PRESENTING and CONTROLLING one of the lesser parts. You can read the “excusing of corruption” at every step. It’s intentionally demoralizing – like – “yeah, he will get away with it, because, well, lookie here, this might just be innocent because of THIS.”
Likewise, there is NO mention of Jeffrey Epstein ANYWHERE in the article. And yet, Water Island is SO CLOSE to Epstein Island, and so convenient for traffic to it, utterly unobserved, that it really makes one think Politico is deliberately walling off Epstein by poking up a smaller scandal in the way and saying “nothing to see here – why don’t you just GO HOME?”
Here is how to locate Water Island on the map above.
Epstein Island is located at the circular location marker up and to the left (NW) of the added text. That marker is RIGHT ON Little St. James, a.k.a. Epstein Island. There is another, adjacent, island of similar but slightly larger size, just up and to the left (NW) of that – this is Great St. James. Epstein also bought THAT island – SECRETLY – the story is NASTY and INTRIGUING, and is described HERE:
Great St. James is off the shore of the BIGGER island to the left, St. Thomas. The capitol city in the center is Charlotte Amalie, clearly labeled in the map. Just below and slightly to the left (SSW) of the label for Charlotte Amalie, and really almost part of the city, is Water Island – unlabeled in the map above.
In this map of St. Thomas and surrounding smaller islands, you can clearly see both Water Island in the center, and Epstein’s two islands in the lower right corner, unlabeled, southeast of the hamlet of Red Hook. Hassel Island, next to Water Island, is mostly uninhabited, and serves as an historical park.
Water Island is a bit like a gated community, although it’s not all that ritzy. I will include a link to a HUGE, high-resolution image of it. Here is a smaller image:
NOW – if you are wondering about how to get from Water Island to Epstein Island, then you may want to get distracted by discrediting theories of submarines, based on the fascinating history of submarines on St. Thomas, and military activities on both St. Thomas and Water Island. However, to be quite frank, it’s just easier to hop on a boat. As you can see in the above picture, boats are everywhere, and there is so much boat traffic, it’s quite easy to lose track of any one boat, let alone any one passenger.
NOW – here is the interesting point from the article. It’s how the Bidens were basically GIVEN a nice parcel of land on Water Island by a lobbyist friend.
The Bidens bought a desirable plot of land.
The Bidens split the land into three subplots.
The Bidens then SOLD one subplot to the lobbyist for the FULL PRICE of the FULL PLOT.
This left the Bidens with over 2/3 of the land FOR FREE – GRATIS – by being OVERPAID for part of it.
The Bidens then secured LOAN MONEY from the lobbyist using the other two plots as collateral.
Now, if that’s confusing, it’s supposed to be. It’s money laundering. What the lobbyist did was give the Bidens PROPERTY, and then let them CASH IN on it with loans.
Say, didn’t the Bidens get money from the Chinese that way, too? Some of it as cash – some of it as LOANS?
Whatever. It’s all very ugly.
Now, the REAL question is whether Hunter Biden was ever on Epstein Island.
I think we’re about to find out.
Get your popcorn now.
And now for a scandal closer to home.
OMG! A LIBTARD POSTED ON THE Q TREE!
Fake News Drain-Circling Psychosis
We got one comment in MODERATION which – well – this person is, shall we say, not a good fit for this site. She is welcome to visit our Gab Group where people can individually “turn her off”, but since we can’t do it here, she did NOT survive “Wolf’s Extreme Vetting“.
This is a MAGA site. If you take BASIC ISSUE with our purpose, you’re probably going to disrupt our day-to-day purpose, which is to support TRUMP. Can’t have that.
However, I think it’s worthwhile to consider what she had to say, so here it is.
All of these folks need to watch the real news and stop the brainwash they are getting from Fox. Amy Barrett will go down as the the SCJ selected by an impeached president in an effort to get himself re-elected so that he can’t be criminally charged for his wrong doings . He couldn’t care less about abortion , our healthcare or whether we live or die. His lack of action to mitigate Covid 19 has made that quite clear. He. did stack the court with far right conservatives in his plan to deprive us of a legitimate vote to rid us if this non-patriot when he refuses to concede and takes away our right to choose a president by putting the decision before the stacked far right Supreme Court that he has weaponized. Save our democracy, despite your hatred of Obama, save our democracy. Wake up , America can’t take four more years of the criminality of the Trump family.
This is, I’m fairly certain, the mentality of people who are still voting for Joe Biden. Now, first of all, many of us here don’t even watch Fox News, since it’s basically the OUTER LIMITS of establishment “allowed” thinking. Sure, there are some great journalists there, like Tucker Carlson, but then again, those are exactly the “far right” personalities that this poster surely rejects.
But as for “real news” – HEY BABY – that is US.
The news – the real news – is something we have to ferret out, past all the lies.
While I’m not going to respond to all of the specific “accusations against Trump” here, I think some are worth addressing.
First, I want to assure this poster (HoH, hereafter) that Amy Coney Barrett is not going to do all the bad things that she (HoH) is afraid of, although Justice Barrett will make SOME decisions which will be INCONVENIENT for Democrat POLICY and POLITICS. However, Barrett will likely UPHOLD liberal policies which are soundly rooted in law, and thus, the poster HoH will be PLEASANTLY SURPRISED on occasion. Possibly many occasions, if she’s just a deluded liberal, and not a lying leftist.
The impeached president stuff, of course, means nothing without a conviction. Bill Clinton survived impeachment, so there is nothing to score here, but I hesitate to use that comparison, because it is a FALSE SYMMETRY. Bill Clinton’s impeachment MATTERED. Trump’s impeachment was blatantly FALSE, and the work of criminals. Fake News consternation aside, Adam Schiff is in trouble for falsely accusing Trump and furthering a HOAX PROSECUTION.
Hoaxes matter. And so do SOME impeachments.
Why did Bill Clinton’s impeachment matter? It was just about SEX – right?
Yes – that is TRUE, although technically it was about LYING about sex. And THAT betrays the much deeper problem of BETRAYAL.
I am now of a belief that CHINA has targeted a particular type of politician who they believe will SELL OUT AMERICA. Bill Clinton and Joe Biden are specific examples of this kind of politician.
politically amoral or sociopathic
sexually immoral
willing to take bribes
married to a spouse PERSONALLY invested in the politician’s success
spouse will support illegalities and immoralities
pol is FAITHLESS to the spouse – betrayal is second nature
both pol and spouse do not return ANGER to blackmail or betrayal, but DEEPEN TIES instead
These are politicians who LIGHT UP China’s “Blue-Gold-Yellow” (BGY) program by giving up intelligence, taking bribes, and being faithless to spouse, God and country.
Trump has done nothing like what Bill Clinton did, even when he “dated around”, shall we say, before and between marriages.
Bill Clinton betrayed our country. He took money from China to do things not in the interests of the United States. All of Trump’s alleged “betrayals” have proven to have been manufactured LIES by people who DID get in bed with China, Russia, Ukraine or Iran.
As for Trump “not really caring” about abortion, healthcare, and OUR LIVES – sorry. Look for the big picture here to not be delusional. Just one – healthcare – Trump FORCED Republicans to accept HIS POSITION on OUR pre-existing conditions. And on COVID-19, we see that he sacrificed HIS ECONOMY to not take a chance on OUR LIVES.
Which brings us to COVID-19.
This is a good one. Trump WINS here, if you dig even slightly below the weak lies of the Biden Coupists. I could get into the deeper weeds of what is REALLY going on here – where I draw in some of the stuff that will appears momentarily in the NEXT parts of this post, but I’m setting aside those items for now.
Why? Because it turns out that viruses are vastly more complicated and subtle than we realized, and most people are not really aware of the nastier parts of the story, which “real science” ADMITS, but kinda slides over to the side of the discussion table, and gets all COUGH COUGH about the nastier parts.
Most people in this world will be SHOCKED when they understand. They will be shocked at how science SCREWED UP in how it responded to the truth about viruses, too. Firing Judy Mikovits did NOT make the complexity of the truth go away – it just delayed things.
And COVID-19 has a lot to do with that. It was a CHEAP MOVE in science, to FORCE Trump to “buy in” to a moneyed and “almost true” but irresponsible position which PROTECTS Tony Fauci.
Nope. We’re going to stick to the SLIGHTLY PHONY STORY – the “standard theory” of viruses, without the problems and the lies – we’re going to PLAY ALONG with what gets printed on the glossy pages in the check-out line – the simple story that leaves the nasty REALITY of viruses OUT, so that MONEY can be obtained through vaccines which treat the part of the story we’re allowed to see.
That is where Trump played along, too, but ACTUALLY CARED about treating people, and BOOM – we have real treatments like HCQ, Regeneron, and (bad as it is) remdesivir. We have vaccines that will work on a subset of colds, although, sadly, SOME OF THEM may cause cancers, immune disorders, and immunodeficiency as well, long term, if you take the wrong ones, and we don’t know which ones those are. It’s rough science, with some very nasty “known unknowns”.
But we’ll deal with it. Soon.
Stocks are already banking on Novavax making money due to its older technology evading concerns on mRNA and DNA, and rightly so. This despite the fact that mRNA and viral vector vaccines are running ahead in terms of trials.
STAY TUNED.
But most of all, Trump did the smart things – the obvious things – and they worked. He did NOT listen to the lies that closing borders would be ineffective. Trump closed the borders and saved lives – although CHINA lied even earlier, and got cases here in January and even December.
It’s very clear to me how our Democrat-allied medical bureaucrats, in league with China, tried to carry out a coup using a new coronavirus and a media scare. When all is revealed, there will be many firings, and convictions, too.
But not yet. We’re “Biden” our time, so to speak.
As for the rest of HoH’s comment – well – it’s mostly a very “Fake News” perspective. Fake News hates Trump, and more importantly hates people like ME, because they’re invested in decades of lies. Those lies are coming undone. WE are not the ones hiding the evidence presented by the other side.
You will not disrupt our TRUTH-SEEKING ALTERNATIVE to the FAKE NEWS.
My mother saw the SAME THING happen to the Nazis. When the Nazi regime fell apart, like the decades-long leftist infiltration is falling apart now, or when ANY socialist regime falls apart, the TRUTH makes a certain sector of the old socialist guard just GO NUTS.
As the DRAIN IS CIRCLED, the cries get shriller, and the ear-covering gets ridiculous.
“Good Obama” – “Good Joe Biden” – “Good Fuehrer” – it’s all the same. They were PHONIES propped up by the media, and when the media falls, THEY FALL.
Trump is not propped up by the media. He SHUNNED their approval from the beginning.
ASK WHY.
There will be people – the “true believers” – who cannot FACE THE DIFFICULT TRUTHS. They won’t CALL the corruption what it is – they won’t even look at it.
The Nazis did not ALLOW discussion of the truth. They – like the communists they are SO SIMILAR TO, would DISRUPT any discussion of the truth. They would keep everything they didn’t want OUT OF THE NEWS and HIDDEN from the People. If people TALKED about it, those voices were DISRUPTED or SQUELCHED. Often BRUTALLY.
THAT is socialism, and we’re SHUTTING IT DOWN.
We WILL NOT live under it. Period.
Join Gab. My advice. Left or right. The TRUTH will come for you there. Like it or not.
I wish House of Heart well in her travels.
Vaya con Dios.
And, if you don’t believe in God, stay classy, and vaya con Dior.
Why I’m Shilling Novavax
BEGIN TL;DR /
I have recently seen or heard a variety of things (I will explain – see WHY below), which have combined to convince me that mRNA and *especially* DNA vaccines are TOO RISKY relative to the *actual* dangers of the China Virus, to be a SAFE choice for people who are NOT in a high-risk category relative to COVID-19 infection.
Now, this is just my personal stance at the moment, and it is subject to change. But right now, my opinion is as follows:
For people not at great risk of harm from the DISEASE, it pays to WAIT until the sum of ALL POSSIBLE RISKS of any particular individual vaccine, experienced over the LIKELY REMAINDER OF LIFE, falls below the known risks of the disease for that person RIGHT NOW.
This is a pure RISK / BENEFIT analysis, using both KNOWN SCIENCE and SCIENTIFIC UNKNOWNS.
This is EXACTLY in keeping with Trump’s family’s INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS on COVID-19 treatments. Trump himself took TWO experimental treatments. His wife and son, both younger, took NO experimental treatments.
If we were dealing with airborne Ebola – WHICH WE ARE NOT – then it would make sense to give most people mRNA and DNA vaccines and “hope for the best”. That is NOT THE CASE, and we need to stop pretending that it is. The “COVID hype” has FAILED, and those who continue it, need to be made to answer for it. It’s time for HONESTY.
Thus, FOR YOUR KIDS of FUTURE KIDS, and for anybody not at high risk, I recommend the Novavax vaccine as less risky for long-term development of CANCER and IMMUNE DISORDERS, both of which are foreseeable potential risks of nucleic acid vaccine biotechnologies, which risks cannot be properly tested for, in the short term, in my opinion.
On the other hand, for those in high-risk COVID groups who need vaccines NOW, and particularly the elderly, any of the vaccines that show short-term safety and efficacy are reasonable risk choices, relative to any possible but unknown long-term consequences.
/END TL;DR
BEGIN WHY /
In my opinion, the risks of mRNA and DNA vaccines are like DES was for children of women who took it – they are LONG-TERM risks, and potentially transmissible to children.
We have been GASLIT into the “need” to take new, relatively untested vaccines, and “hoping for the best”.
NO. Just NO.
In my opinion, ONLY people either (1) at high risk of DEATH from COVID-19, due to age and/or comorbidities, OR (2) those who are willing to BRAVELY VOLUNTEER, at the risk of late-in-life cancer or immune disorders, possibly even to their children, to find out if mRNA and DNA vaccines are actually SAFE long term, should take the “novel” mRNA or DNA vaccines.
It will be YEARS before we know if these technologies are either guaranteed safe or controllably safe (meaning we know how to make them safe against ALL potential gotchas).
I’m not saying that we should not make and in some cases TAKE these vaccines. I’m saying that these vaccines have KNOWN and EASILY FORESEEABLE LONG-TERM RISKS, and we are NOT being open and honest about those risks.
The Chinese are being very cautious about the new vaccine technologies, both because they are a bit behind, and because they are basically letting Americans experiment on Americans. However, the Chinese are also taking risks just by pushing primarily the very oldest-style vaccines, which are at extremely high risk of immune enhancement phenomena.
Because the Novavax vaccine is using BOTH modern technology which evades immune enhancement, AND established technology which has a proven safety record, and is NOT taking RISKS inherent to mRNA and DNA technologies, I am of the opinion that it is the most THEORETICALLY SAFE of the vaccines thus far.
I would give Novavax to my own children without worry, based on what I know now. I would only give an mRNA or DNA alternative to an OLDER RELATIVE or one with a serious comorbidity. If my parents were alive right now, both thus being VERY old with SERIOUS comorbidities, I would almost certainly advise that they get the first available vaccine, since all the front-runners appear to be headed for approval when phase 3 tests are done, IMO.
Now – let me explain my position.
Regarding viruses and vaccines, I am quite familiar with the broader topics in biology, biochemistry, pharmacology, and other relevant sciences, and even the “basics” of how viruses and vaccines work. However, I was NOT aware of the nitty-gritty of viruses and vaccines until recently, as I began to try to understand the different vaccine and therapeutic offerings which are coming in Operation Warp Speed.
I was shocked, at the beginning, to discover that the very first coronavirus vaccine mentioned in my news feed, the Inovio offering, was in fact a DNA vaccine. I had to DIG to discover that aspect. It was not even mentioned in the “top-level” Twitter-mediated links. Indeed, I had to dig just to find Bill Gates mentioned.
The details of the Inovio vaccine are quite interesting.
Digging into the OTHER vaccines in the running, I discovered that for every DNA vaccine, there were several mRNA vaccines (m = “messenger”) also in the running, and the mRNA vaccines were actually more advanced in terms of clinical trials.
The above list is the state of things in MAY, as far as vaccines in clinical trials. Now, jump to July.
Now, I could have spent a lot of time reading paywall-slipping scientific literature (very difficult for poor “people’s scientists” like me to find), trying to come to my own opinion about the safety of mRNA and DNA vaccines, but I found a faster way to “poll scientists past the fake news” – that was simply to raise the red flag on RNA and DNA vaccines, and see how fast the industry shot down my red flag. If mRNA and DNA vaccines were obviously and inherently safe, there should have been a DOGPILE of both scientists and shills to “correct” me.
Instead, there were CRICKETS.
What I did next was even more desperate. I started calling these vaccines “genetic modification” – a direct and specific accusation, which should have been SHOT DOWN HARD WITH SOUND SCIENCE if genetic incorporation of some kind was not a risk. That meme spread, and I watched what happened.
Instead of saying “GENES CANNOT BE MODIFIED BY THESE VACCINES!”, there was several kinds of weak counter-arguments, based on definitions, assertions, and ideals. Nobody ever “did the John Kasich” and said “Vaccines can’t modify your genes – that’s crazy talk!” There was dancing around the core accusation – never even an attempt at a solid rebuttal.
Now, you have to understand – I’ve gotten “that’s crazy talk” for a whole lot more obviously REAL stuff than this plausible but kinda freaky idea, that vaccines might mess with your genes. I found that VERY surprising. I know how scientists and left-wing “science is real” types love to correct other people, and most of all “errant scientists”, when they step on thin ice.
Was I actually on SOLID GROUND?
Leave it to a “Twitter Angel” to sneak up on me and drop a huge hint – “CRISPR” – in a reply. The person accused COVID-19 vaccines of INTENTIONALLY modifying our genes.
One quick search to validate, and…..
WHOA, NELLY!
It turns out that there ARE, IN FACT, VACCINES which depend on genetic modification. They use CRISPR-Cas9 technology to make gene insertions.
That headline actually HIDES the current state of research – in which WORKING VACCINES which “edit the genes of T cells” are not just someday, but RIGHT NOW, and showing desirable results.
HOWEVER, as far as I can tell, NONE of the current coronavirus vaccines – NONE of them – intentionally edit genes.
However, you would be shocked not only how easy that is to do – meaning EDITING your DNA – what’s even more shocking is how easily it is to do badly, and cause problems.
AS RETROVIRUSES, IN FACT, DO.
However, before I get to retroviruses, which “seal the deal” for me on making the sign of the cross at mRNA and DNA vaccines, I need to talk about TWO other things.
First, CANCER.
The October 19, 2020 issue of Molenium Magazine, a.k.a. Chemical & Engineering News, has a really great cover story, on a tumor phenomenon known somewhat generally as “circular DNA”, more commonly as “extrachromosomal DNA” (ecDNA), and also as “extrachromosomal circular DNA” (eccDNA), but be careful, because for whatever weird historical reasons, ALL of it seems to be circular, and ecDNA is regarded as a subset of eccDNA, rather than the other way around.
Let’s repeat for clarity.
This article is about “little circles of DNA”, referred to as ecDNA, or extra-chromosomal DNA, which seem to be tied to tumor resistance and survival. ecDNA is the name traditionally associated with the little circles of DNA prevalent in TUMORS.
It’s an exciting and active area of research, and I highly recommend the article. Note that the author is Ryan Cross, who has done all kinds of great vaccine reporting for C&EN.
What do you know, the Inovio DNA vaccine for coronavirus injects you with little circular bits of DNA, too!
That image is from a GREAT slideshow, which explains the FANTASTIC (and I mean it) probable and in some cases PROVEN upside of the technology.
You will note, as you watch the slideshow, that the technology is even useful AGAINST virus-caused cancers, by increasing immunity to those specific viruses. The POSITIVES on the technology are GREAT.
But what about the downside? What are the RISKS of new technology so similar to what it is being used against – meaning little bits of DNA or RNA that CAUSE tumors?
Well, there’s nothing in the slideshow. But let’s ask ON OUR OWN.
NOW – the circular DNA used by the vaccine is referred to as a plasmid.
Plasmid is another name for a small circle of DNA. Not only are plasmids of certain natures very similar to the circular DNA (ecDNA) expressed BY tumors in humans (see above article), the plasmids of some bacteria can actually CAUSE tumors, e.g., the “Ti plasmid”, which stands for Tumor-inducing plasmid, which infects and causes galls to form in plants, by hijacking their cells using DNA.
Now – I’m not arguing that plasmid-based vaccines, working as they are SUPPOSED TO WORK, are going to cause cancer, or are even LIKELY to cause cancer. But I’m not going to exclude the possibility – the KNOWN UNKNOWN – that if something goes wrong, they MIGHT cause cancer.
To see how REASONABLE it is to associate cancer with eccDNA of various kinds, just read about those “names” for the circular DNA that I was just mentioning. BOTH Wikipedia articles have extensive sections on the role of these types of DNA in cancer.
And now, let’s make things even WORSE, by adding VIRUSES and IMMUNE DISORDERS.
Now – I’m not a “true believer” in Judy Mikovits. However, her obsession with XMRVs (a type of retrovirus) has really forced me to understand just how much of a MESS viruses actually are. The REALITY of retroviruses is GODAWFUL. Viruses, and particularly retroviruses, have made a complete MESS of RNA and DNA. They LITERALLY write themselves into the genome like GRAFFITI IN BOOKS, and they’ve damn near filled the books. Worse still, they started doing it so long ago, and have done it so much – to the point that some think retroviruses are RESPONSIBLE for DNA evolving as a solution to genetic storage – that I’m not even sure that this history occurred ON THIS PLANET.
It is extremely worthwhile to read the following, including the sections on gene therapy and CANCER, to understand the BASICS of retroviruses.
All of this is not enough to “know” that DNA and mRNA vaccines are going to do anything “bad” in the long term. But it is VERY apparent that DNA and RNA are a MESS – the “cental dogma” of untouchable, royally decreeing DNA is a laughable LIE, and vaccine biology operates in a china shop filled with blind lunatics on bicycles, drunk bears, and children with firehoses.
Everything taken together, I simply don’t trust the new mRNA and DNA vaccines to have figured out known unknowns, let alone unknown unknowns, that won’t become evident for 75 years and 2 generations.
My advice? Avoid the part of the “central dogma” that is blatantly untrue – that DNA is “read-only” except by blessed mechanisms.
PROTEIN IS SAFETY (disregarding snake venoms, of course). If you are risk averse, PROTEIN like NOVAVAX is where to take your chances.
Thus, you will be seeing me shilling primarily for Novavax, particularly to the vaccine hesitant, the young, the healthy, and the future or present parents. I will shill the other stuff to the other folks.
Now you know why.
Calling All Prayer Warriors
I get a lot of revelations in the shower, but they’re usually of a scientific or political nature, not a religious one.
This one just hit me like a ton of bricks, but gentle as a breeze. When in my mind, troubled by the days ahead, I uttered the words HAND OF GOD – I immediately felt a powerful understanding and peace wash over me – PEACE AND STRENGTH – and right then, I knew that this was something that must be shared.
We need to pray for the HAND OF GOD to descend on us with power, comfort, and STRENGTH, so that we may stand firm and resolute – to NOT be incited to violence – to stand for PEACE when the easy solution is WAR.
To not be afraid, but rather to be confident. To go forth strongly and with PURPOSE, clear in our righteousness, filled with mercy and understanding.
Remember it, when you are troubled.
HAND OF GOD.
And your troubles will be swept away, with POWER not your own.
Give them nothing but one more day to rue, and the wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Remain CIVIL and possibly even GENTEEL.
Today, in our VERY SPECIAL Wolf’s Mole Day issue, we have FIVE SHORT LESSONS in politically incorrect WOLFTHINK.
What is a Mole?
Before we ask What is “Mole Day?”, let’s ask: What is a “mole”?
Think of the idea “a pair” (2) of shoes, or “a dozen” (12) eggs. Increase a dozen by 1 to 13 (“a baker’s dozen”) of bagels or doughnuts. Increase to 144 for “a gross” of bottle rockets to celebrate the 4th of July.
You will see that named numbers useful for MEASURING QUANTITIES OF THINGS are “a thing”. They are “convenient numbers”. Now, while dozens, baker’s dozens, and grosses of those things aren’t really all that tied to physical realities, PAIRS of things are strongly related to biology – the fact that so many living organisms have BILATERAL symmetry, so “things” appear in pairs, and thus “pairs” become a thing – a useful thing to talk about.
Still with me? Yeah, it’s fluffy. Just go along and you will enjoy the fluffiness and tastiness, and maybe even some “empty calories”, of the mental cotton candy.
Now a DOZEN is actually a useful number (12) because it is so DIVISIBLE by common lower numbers, i.e. by 2, 3, 4 and 6. So UTILITY doesn’t have to be just physically rooted – it can be rooted in mathematics, finance, money, and/or stuff like that.
A MOLE is like a scientifically useful version of the dozen or pair. A mole is the number of atoms of carbon-12 that weighs exactly 12 grams. Once that number was decided, the number was fixed.
The number is 6.02214076 × 1023
This number is also called Avogadro’s number, the Avogadro number, the Avogadro constant, etc.
Now that seems very simple, but one is bound to ask the question “12 and 12 – WHY?”, and that is a great question, but before we answer it, I want to clarify some things about the basic relationship – the definition – that will make you go “AHA!”
First, we repeat:
A mole is the number of atoms of carbon-12 that weighs exactly 12 grams.
Here is what that necessarily implies, mathematically:
if a GRAM ITSELF were different, a MOLE would be a proportionately different number
if the NUMBER OF GRAMS of carbon we chose were different from 12, then a MOLE would be a fractionally or multiply different number
if we chose a DIFFERENT element / isotope and used its matching number (say, 235 grams of uranium 235, a MOLE would be a SLIGHTLY different number, because of nuclear binding energy differences
All of that should help you see this basic point – the NUMBER of grams was PICKED so that “a mole of something” would make the number of grams match its atomic weight, roughly, and centered most strongly on carbon 12, the most common isotope of carbon.
A MOLE is a convenience number for roughing it. Thus, 12 grams (1 mole) of carbon (mostly isotope 12) and 32 grams (2 moles) of oxygen (mostly isotope 16) will react to give 44 grams (1 mole) of carbon dioxide, which has a “molar mass”, and a “molecular mass”, of roughly 44.
A mole (6.02214076 × 1023) makes the number of moles come out conveniently, just like a pair makes the number of legs, arms, eyes, and weapons-grade ta-tas come out conveniently.
We will forever thank WHEATIETOO for the hilarious term “WGTT”!
FOUR could be a “pair” for cows, and then cows would have a pair of legs and a pair of udders, but even for cows (no pun intended), you can see that having a pair be TWO is more convenient, because there are fewer instances of “fractional pairs”, as eyes, horns, and snorting nostrils would have to be.
SO – a “mole” of something is a LOGICAL NUMBER. And “Mole Day” was an educator’s fun way to celebrate this LOGICAL THINKING.
For more information, and a more professional explanation, try HERE:
What Mole Day is NOT, is any kind of celebration of STINKY DIAPER and other such refuse that sneaks into positions of power, influence and especially SPY AGENCIES and then undermines them.
YUCK!
No, we’re going to talk about the celebration of LOVABLE, HUGGABLE MOLES!
Wikipedia actually has a good description of what “Mole Day” is.
Mole Day
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mole Day is an unofficial holiday celebrated among chemists, chemistry students and chemistry enthusiasts on October 23, between 6:02 a.m. and 6:02 p.m.,[1][2] making the date 6:02 10/23 in the American style of writing dates. The time and date are derived from the Avogadro number, which is approximately 6.02×1023, defining the number of particles (atoms or molecules) in one mole (mol) of substance, one of the seven base SI units.
Overview
Mole Day originated in an article in The Science Teacher in the early 1980s.[3] Inspired by this article, Maurice Oehler, now a retired high schoolchemistry teacher from Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin, founded the National Mole Day Foundation (NMDF) on May 15, 1991.[3]
Many high schools around the United States, South Africa, Australia, and Canada celebrate Mole Day as a way to get their students interested in chemistry, with various activities often related to chemistry or moles.[3]
The American Chemical Society sponsors National Chemistry Week,[1] which occurs from the Sunday through Saturday during which October 23 falls. This makes Mole Day an integral part of National Chemistry Week.
So there you have it.
Today is MOLE DAY, celebrating the number 6.02×1023 at 6:02 AM to PM on October 23rd.
It’s that simple.
In Praise of Fellow Critter Mole
Normally, Wolf finds Mole to be either PESKY or TASTY, depending upon his mood. However, on Mole Day, Wolf recalls fondly his youthful admiration for Mole, before an asteroid called FAKE SCIENCE struck the giant Turtle upon which humanity lives.
Shortly after Fake Science struck, The Wicked Witch of The West, Nanzi Pelosi, with her Flying Monkeys of Global Warming, took Professor Molenium hostage, and promised to burn up all of Kalifornistan with wildfires, if the leaders of all the scientific organizations didn’t implement Critical Race Theory and Settled Science.
So here we are.
On Mole Day, Wolf remembers when science actually WAS real, and not decided by treasonous media and “white guilt”, another fine product of CCP brainwashing. He remembers when nobody cared whether Mole was White Hispanic Mole, Black White Supremacist Mole, or A Really Large Number (6.02×1023).
Ah, those were the days.
Mole was a Fun Guy back then – totally devoid of color.
Wolf will try to remember him that way. Or her. Whatever.
Vaccines, Nanotechnology & Reality
Wolf got a hot tip from his friend Mole, that Molenium Magazine, a.k.a. Chemical & Engineering News, had a great article about COVID-19 vaccines, which Mole knew that Wolf was interested in. Oh, boy, you can say that again. As soon as Wolf read the article, he understood not only why “Trump vaccines” are going to work, and why the ChiComs stole that Harvard Nanotechnology guy for their Thousand Talents of Silver program – he ALSO understood why the #WuMao on Twitter and elsewhere are pushing extremely bogus ideas about nanotechnology and vaccines on Trump’s base, to dumb us down and try to defeat Trump.
NOPE. Wolf has to do something about NASTY NANZI and her NASTY CHICOMS. Or maybe it’s Nasty ChiComs and THEIR Nasty Nanzi. Either way.
AGAIN.
Allow me to explain.
The ideas that you need to understand why TRUMP VACCINES WORK are very simple, but they expose a lot of DECEPTION, and that part is COMPLICATED.
First, viruses ARE nanomachines. Viruses ARE little robots. They were designed by nature, which was designed by God.
If you used REAL nanotechnology (called chemistry, biochemistry, and molecular biology) to make a little DRONE VIRUS that looks like one but doesn’t actually infect you, you’re not even making a working robot. It’s almost like a SCARECROW of a robot. It’s like a kid in a Halloween costume, and we’re figuring out how to make them actually scary to scare your immune system into BEING A PREPPER.
That is the level of technology the Chinese communists have made you FEAR, when their trolls get online and gin up CONCERN about NANOTECHNOLOGY AND VACCINES. The ChiComs ALMOST HINT that little robots are going to be released by these vaccines, and that they will turn you into a TRANSHUMAN of some kind.
SCARECROWS. That is the level of “robot” we’re talking about.
See how this works? We want antibodies to attack the SCARECROW VIRUS out on its tips of the spike proteins, so scientists figured out how to make it more like a porcupine shape, so they don’t have to put a bunch of aluminum and GARBAGE in poorly working vaccines, that Adam Schiff pretends are not a reality.
Note that such GOOD SCIENCE is the stuff that ChiNazi spies try to STEAL from our researchers. REAL science. GOOD science.
And then they try to make us believe BAD SCIENCE, or better yet, DISTRUST ALL SCIENCE.
Communism did this. COMMUNISM.
AND logic, people. Vaccines are sometimes BAD but they don’t have to be. Vaccines are often GOOD but they aren’t always so. SCIENCE IS REAL – but not like lying Democrats and deceiving socialists will tell you, because socialism has allegiance to itself and not THE TRUTH. Socialism says “believe Tedros and WHO” when both are proven LIARS and puppets of deceitful socialists like the CHINAZIS.
The W.H.O. can be WRONG, DECEIVED, or LYING. Susan Wocommie of YouTube pretends that’s not true.
LOGICAL THINKING. Accept the complication of multiple simple truths. It will help us BEAT THESE COMMIES.
Second, there ARE NO little metal or plastic nanobots that race out of vaccines to destroy you, for the exact same beautiful quantum mechanical reasons that Fantastic Voyage and Innerspace are both science fiction and not science.
No matter how many HOT WHITE MAGA LADY DOCTORS tell you things that are just a bit out of their league, those things are not always true – or at least, they’re not COMPLETELY TRUE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZH1Drpnjo
I recommend that you listen to this lady, as far as learning to be SKEPTICAL. Much of what she has to say is very true. Some of it is a bit wrong, or very distant and “hand-wavey”.
Listen to this lady on things like UNKNOWNS of new and untested DNA vaccines, including uncertainties about UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES, which are “NOT POSSIBLE” on paper, but could be realities, like GENETIC INCORPORATION. After all, why are our human genomes LITTERED with viral JUNK? Yeah. There’s that, too. How did THAT happen? Bear in mind that there ARE vaccines which DEPEND on genetic incorporation. Those vaccines use CRISPR-Cas9 technology to EDIT YOUR GENES in T cells.
None of the current TRUMP VACCINES use this KNOWING gene-modifying tech, as far as I know, and I sure would not want MY NAME on any future ones that are not VERY up-front about using CRISPR-Cas9 genetic modification technology or similar, and about the DANGERS of this technology.
Listen to this gal on UNTESTED NEW TECHNOLOGIES like mRNA, which even the Moderna mRNA vaccine scientists ADMIT in their published papers could have unintended consequences because they’ve never been tried on humans on a large scale, and are full of uncertainty. The subtle aroma of CYA just POURS from that part of the scientific papers. They wrote the disclaimers for the ages. Nobody wants to be remembered as Doctor Frankenstein.
Listen to her on DIGITAL TRACKING USING MICRONEEDLE ARRAY TECHNOLOGY, and SURREPTITIOUS CONTRACEPTION, STERILIZATION AND ABORTION. Yup. It’s ALL THERE.
On nanotechnology? Ehhhhhhh, NOT SO MUCH. She’s out of her league, in my opinion. This is where she waves her hands and relies on fear. Yes, TRANSHUMANISM is both a threat and an opportunity, long range. Yes, NANOTECH can and will be abused, no doubt. But not in these specific vaccines, IMO, as far as the active, openly sought, coronavirus vaccines, PER SE.
The nanotech being used NOW in the stated vaccines is actually just advanced biochemistry, bleeding into biology via biophysics. You will see below. It’s very simple, crude, early stuff. I will explain, very gently. And once you understand it, it’s simple, but WONDERFUL.
NOW – this is not to say that REAL quality scientific breakthroughs – like TRUMP VACCINES and TRUMP ANTIBODIES – could not possibly be used to hide LIES and DECEPTION – such as added STERILITY VACCINES and ABORTION ADDITIVES and HUMAN TRACKING NUMBERS (any dye-bearing micro-needle array vaccine will mark you uniquely), because – well – just listen to this lady above, and also below, with Mike Adams to help ferret out the truth.
Good vaccines are KNOWN to have been TAMPERED WITH to inflict ABORTION on unknowing recipients, mostly, apparently, black women in Africa. It’s UGLY and CRUEL and people need to be in PRISON for this stuff.
This is a VERY fascinating interview. What is revealed here is that ABORTION VACCINES are a THING. Not just sterilization vaccines. ABORTION vaccines.
There are GOOD PEOPLE in science, who pursue only TRUTH. They don’t have HIDDEN AGENDAS.
However, there are BAD PEOPLE who try to control science for hidden agendas. Like these.
They may FUND good science for COVER, such as coronavirus vaccine research, but their real interest is their HIDDEN AGENDA, such as surreptitious contraception, abortion, and depopulation. To say nothing of GETTING TRUMP OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE.
OK? It’s going to be COMPLICATED BUSINESS to ferret out the BAD GUYS and KEEP THEM OUT.
The “nanobots” and “nanotechnology” are always the SCARY PAYLOAD of #WuMao anti-vaccine propaganda to dumb you down. BEWARE. They won’t explain it, so you will just FEAR IT.
I’m explaining it, so that you will not only NOT fear it – you will DESPISE and NOT TRUST the Chinese communists who try to deceive you. And so you will not trust ANYBODY WHO HELPS THEM.
Third, the main nanobot action of the COVID-19 virus is for the spikes to CHANGE SHAPE to EXPOSE HIDDEN WEAPONS as well as to deploy DECOYS designed to fool BODILY DEFENSES.
This is INTELLIGENCE. This is SMART. It’s SNEAKY. Evolution was the INTELLIGENT PROCESS used by various viruses to LEARN TO HIDE THEIR WEAPONS from bodily defenses.
We have the explanation of the appearance of vaccine immune enhancement (i.e., a substantial fraction of “failing and dangerous vaccines”) RIGHT HERE. It’s beautiful, and it shows HOW and WHY viruses evolved defenses against the human immune system.
And if you are thinking “Wow, this kind of viral sneakery will only get worse because of the CCP ChiNazis”, then yes – you see the THREAT that the CCP poses, allying not with humanity and LIFE but with CHAOS, LIES and DARKNESS.
One of the most important points from Li-Meng Yan and her two papers is the level of DECEPTION built into the China Virus. The ChiNazis have learned to bury their sneakery under evolution. How cute. This is why HER testimony is so important to the world.
So are you ready to “read along with Wolf”?
Let’s begin.
Back to the start.
Let’s read the title. “The tiny tweak behind COVID-19 vaccines”. This is actually a big deal. Almost ALL of the “Trump vaccines” which are also “Bill Gates vaccines” IN THEORY (very important) are using this “tiny tweak” which FIXES THEM against vaccine immune enhancement.
[ Side Note: A Trump vaccine is a Trump vaccine until you add an ABORTIFACIENT to it, or a DIGITAL TRACKER to it, and then it becomes a Bill Gates vaccine. ]
Vaccine-induced immune enhancement is something that Gail Combs and I have harped on endlessly as a HUGE bugaboo in vaccines, and particularly in coronavirus vaccines. It is the PROBLEM which Communist Democrats REFUSE to admit exists, and – OMG – it was SOLVED for these vaccines.
I am POSITIVE that scientists have FOUND the basic problem and FIXED IT.
SOMEBODY will get a Nobel prize for this stuff. Not a “Noble Prize”. A real NOBEL.
Read the SUBTITLE to begin understanding the KEY MOVE.
Prepandemic coronavirus research by Jason McLellan and Barney Graham led to a trick for stabilizing the prefusion form of spike proteins
This seems like a “tiny tweak”, but it’s not. This “trick” is a major advance in FIXING VACCINES AS A WHOLE. Conceptually, it has opened the DOOR to making VACCINES as SMART as VIRUSES.
NOW do you understand why those ChiCom SPIES are trying to get this stuff?
And it is all NANOTECHNOLOGY. REAL nanotechnology. Not some scary Alinsky boogeyman nanotechnology.
So – let’s look at the problem, using the SAME VIRUS that Gail Combs has been telling us about – the one where the early vaccine KILLED KIDS.
Here is how the “spike-like” F surface protein of RSV CHANGES when it interacts with a cell.
The protein on the left is what it looks like BEFORE it attacks your cells. The one on the right is AFTER it attacks. The disappearing RED ZONE is the part that SHOULD GET flagged by antibodies.
Very ironic (or perhaps I should say VIRONIC) that the protein turns from what looks like a CLOSED KNIFE into what looks like a CLUB.
This is VERY, VERY similar to what happens to the spike proteins of COVID-19 virus:
What this means is that we should NOT be looking for and trying to stop THIS…..
…..because doing so will result in the useless biological law-enforcement cluster-pluck that we know as IMMUNE ENHANCEMENT – which is doing too much, too late.
Instead, we should be looking for and trying to stop THIS:
GET IT?
Going back to the “left-vs.-right” protein pictures above, we want antibodies that seek out and stop what is ON THE LEFT – not what is ON THE RIGHT.
The stuff on the RIGHT is EXPENDED protein. It’s USED BRASS. It’s FIRED BULLETS.
This was ALWAYS the problem with BOTHour bodily defenses AND failing vaccines. They were primarily keying on the WRONG THING. This is why DEAD VIRUS was a fail as a vaccine for so many viruses. The proteins “hair trigger” into their FIRED STATE and the resulting virons don’t work to train the body to spot LIVE VIRUS with UNFIRED PROTEINS.
So how do we get the proteins we need to TRAIN the body correctly?
CRISIS ACTORS!!!
Yes. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. The TRUTH is almost hilarious.
I’m not going to get into the SPECIFIC chemistry of what scientists did to create DUMMY RIGGED SPIKE PROTEINS for your body to take target practice on, but they basically used two approaches, in combination with BLANK ROUNDS.
First, the BLANK ROUNDS part.
The “blank rounds” are the fact that these new Trump vaccines are INCOMPLETE as viruses. There is no complete virus. No matter what principle is used, there is not enough information for a COMPLETE VIRUS. Trump vaccines cannot infect you, unlike “live virus” or faulty “attenuated / weakened” virus vaccines.
In the case of Novavax, you are getting DUMMY RIGGED SPIKE PROTEIN stuck in a FAKE VIRUS BALL, with no RNA to create more of it. This is ultimate scarecrow stuff. Pre-fab scarecrows.
In the case of the others, like Pfizer and Moderna, you are getting DUMMY RIGGED RNA which serves as instructions to make the DUMMY RIGGED SPIKE PROTEIN, but nothing else needed to build the complete virus. These vaccines create the equivalent of the Novavax vaccine “in vivo”.
YOUR body, near the injection site, MAKES the scarecrows.
SO, the main point. How did they create “dummy rigged spike protein” or its instructions? What *IS* the dummy rigged spike protein? Alternatively stated, “how did they make the scarecrow, or the design of the scarecrow?”
They basically used TWO techniques, to make a FAKE spike protein that is LIKE the real thing, but which can’t change shape and “open up”.
One technique was to substitute ANGLE IRONS for hinges.
The other technique was to substitute MOLECULAR VELCRO for smooth chrome plate at key points.
The combination of the two types of MUTATIONS (because that is what these would be in real life – BAD MUTATIONS) utterly SABOTAGES the spike protein. It turns it into a super dud. It cannot “open up” and attack cells. But it’s a DUD that looks exactly like the real McCoy, coming into the fight.
It’s CRISIS ACTORS with BLANKS.
Send ’em in, and let the immune system shoot ’em up for target practice. It’s RUTHLESS.
The first innovation these scientists tried used TWO of the angle iron substitutions – the amino acid PROLINE – and is thus called the “2P mutation“. That is being used in MOST of the Trump vaccines, but not all. The AstraZeneca vaccine (which ran into trouble, BTW) does not use it. It’s not fully certain that the 2P mutation works in ACTUAL VACCINES, but based on reports that the Pfizer vaccine could be approved in November, it is VERY likely that it does actually work “well enough”.
[ PS and hint – it’s always useful to look who casts doubt on key advances in science. Just sayin’. ]
Now, this research is not resting on its laurels – it is ALREADY moving on to better and better crisis actor proteins and / or instructions for the same. Stated more fully…..
WORK IS ALREADY WELL UNDERWAY ON SECOND-GENERATION TRUMP VACCINES.
How do you like THAT?!!!
Here is a new rigged spike protein called “HexaPro” (named after the SIX proline angle irons – the red/blue pentagonal units pointed out in the upper left magnification).
Here is a guide to the picture, for those who are interested in the how the FOUR TYPES OF RIGGING work.
Here is a LINK and a summary – basically the header information from the paper (it’s still HUGE).
The development of therapeutic antibodies and vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is focused on the spike (S) protein that decorates the viral surface. A version of the spike ectodomain that includes two proline substitutions (S-2P) and stabilizes the prefusion conformation has been used to determine high-resolution structures. However, even S-2P is unstable and difficult to produce in mammalian cells. Hsieh et al. characterized many individual and combined structure-guided substitutions and identified a variant, named HexaPro, that retains the prefusion conformation but shows higher expression than S-2P and can also withstand heating and freezing. This version of the protein is likely to be useful in the development of vaccines and diagnostics.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to accelerated efforts to develop therapeutics and vaccines. A key target of these efforts is the spike (S) protein, which is metastable and difficult to produce recombinantly. We characterized 100 structure-guided spike designs and identified 26 individual substitutions that increased protein yields and stability. Testing combinations of beneficial substitutions resulted in the identification of HexaPro, a variant with six beneficial proline substitutions exhibiting higher expression than its parental construct (by a factor of 10) as well as the ability to withstand heat stress, storage at room temperature, and three freeze-thaw cycles. A cryo–electron microscopy structure of HexaPro at a resolution of 3.2 angstroms confirmed that it retains the prefusion spike conformation. High-yield production of a stabilized prefusion spike protein will accelerate the development of vaccines and serological diagnostics for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Dig into THAT if you want to get very close to the state of the art.
Now – here is where WOLF is going to put in a good word for Molenium Magazine, a.k.a. Chemical & Engineering News. This is one HELL of an article. This kind of reporting, and this particular article, should be everywhere. If people knew this stuff, they would realize all kinds of GREAT things.
Not only GREAT THINGS about REALITY, but about the REALITY of great things IN AMERICA.
About GREAT THINGS happening in America.
About the TRUMP VACCINES.
About TRUMP.
And that is exactly why you are NOT hearing about this stuff – ANYWHERE.
Our FAKE NEWS is sitting on the TRUTH about the Trump vaccines precisely because they ARE the “Trump vaccines” – the vaccines that Trump, together with his advisers, pushed for.
And THAT leads me to my next topic. Exactly WHY we’re seeing the TRAVESTY of great science journalism and great science truth being IGNORED and MARGINALIZED in the mainstream.
How China Stole Logic From The West
When I worked in shallow state, I saw – literally, over many years – thousands of jobs shipped overseas, many to China. It was done in a very careful way. Nobody saw THEIR current job shipped to China. Nobody saw their close coworker’s job shipped to China. It was always done carefully, distantly, and invisibly. Sometimes there was a certain amount of “musical chairs” to make jobs come and go in a complicated way, to hide the sending of jobs, but away they went. The jobs that were sent to India were more open, because they were less controversial. But when numbers came out, the numbers indicated there had been a massive loss of “growth jobs” to China.
Jobs going to China were always more hush-hush than jobs going to India or elsewhere.
The thing is, China doesn’t just do this by simply gaining advantage for China. They also insist on hurting America at the same time. It’s HOW THEY ROLL. They don’t just beat America in the race. They make sure America runs a bad race, or is permanently harmed. THAT is China.
THAT is the CCP.
When mainland, PRC Chinese suddenly started working with us, here in the US, the Hong Kong Chinese and Taiwanese who had previously worked for us, began a delicate dance of “situational awareness” and self-protection. This produced a wealth of information, for those who had friends in those groups, who were willing to talk. Not all were forthcoming with information, but some information I got was simply astounding. This information made me watchful, and my vigilant state then PAID OFF BIG-TIME.
One important thing that I began to learn, once made aware of CCP actions in US companies, was how CCP assets in the United States would deniably sabotage US operations. Their work is subtle, and sometimes even hidden by a certain amount of self-deprecation, but it is extremely effective.
A CCP asset doesn’t have to crash a US company by themselves to begin what can become a massive compromise or even downfall. They only need to compromise a small bit of workflow around themselves – possibly while looking good themselves. All they have to do is remove the MARGIN – the EDGE – the BREAK-EVEN – the BLACK INK – of a low-margin but critical group, and they can create the case for outsourcing to China. Combine this with “global-minded” upper management and the inability of lower management to make allegations against skilled players who are ready to use leftist “protection” memes as defenses, and it becomes very difficult to defend keeping operations in the United States.
One example really stayed with me, of how they operate. The CCP asset was a young mainlander with “some computer security experience”, whose pretense of slight incompetence was simply too opportune and skilled to be real, but whose pretense of goofy honesty could disarm almost ANY American.
The way I caught him was almost accidental. There was a certain long-running, weekly, technical meeting which was always a struggle. In its past, it had achieved many useful things, typically resulting from a combination of policy resolutions and creation of enabling new technologies to facilitate the agreed resolutions. Good things had come from all of the members, except a few.
Sadly, this meeting had become notoriously ineffective and rarely produced any worthwhile progress for several years, despite leadership and membership which should have yielded great things. It got to the point where many of us simply joked about the meeting being a waste of time. Many felt that the meeting would likely go away, as it produced nothing.
At one meeting, where a surprisingly worthwhile solution was actually getting traction, I observed that this Chinese guy derailed the discussion by injecting an outdated concern, ironically an older problem mostly with some of the Chinese staff and non-Chinese management, who he was specifically targeting with this concern at the meeting. I was shocked at how effectively this torpedoed the progress of the group on the issue. My old conversations with non-PRC coworkers familiar with PRC tactics came rushing back to mind. This was NOT something they had told me about, but it resembled other tactics that I HAD been warned about.
Knowing what to watch for, I decided to spend less time interacting at this meeting, and more time observing the likely CCP asset. He had a remarkable way of heading off almost ANY productive discussion. It got to the point where I had to (not always successfully) suppress laughter every time he derailed the group. The group leaders, who included many managers and senior technical staff, were utterly oblivious to what he was doing, and sometimes he would even ham it up a bit, as if he was playing a trick on a small child and “having fun with it”.
With this experience, it was not hard for me, more recently, to believe that a CCP cell spread among California graduate students was undermining multiple American universities, by promoting American radicals, when their communications were exposed.
But it gets worse.
I am now convinced that socialist-trained scientists have been LITERALLY trained to “virtue-signal through science”, and thus follow MEDIA CUES on how to TIP their science for psychological rewards.
This is why the CCP always made sure that there was a party political officer in both military and technical units – not so much to apply the STICK of party discipline, but to make sure that the CARROTS which reward VIRTUE SIGNALS went to the right people for the “right work”.
This does not just work on the Chinese – it works on EVERYBODY.
I have mentioned before that I know a number of “East Bloc and Former Soviet Union” emigres, refugees, defectors and escapees. Though most will not describe themselves as socialists, and will even reject the label, they love Bernie Sanders, and support policies that are basically socialist.
THIS behavior fits PRECISELY with what a young Taiwanese friend told me years ago. This friend insisted that mainland socialism just CHANGED people – that it removed parts of their human morality – that it made them socialists, whether they admitted it or not. In the opinion of this friend, the DAMAGE could never be removed, if the person actually GREW UP under CCP socialism. CCP socialist training STAYED with a person.
This is, I believe, how the climate change scam worked. People don’t WANT to admit that they “virtue signal in their practice of science”, but they DO, and socialists KNOW IT. Just like a FIRE can be grown from a small bit of smoking grass into a FOREST FIRE, so a small, politically desired bit of politically useful science can be grown from small to large, first in the Petri dish of a small corner of niche science, then fanned larger and larger with media attention and publisher rewards. Having “comrades” in both the media and science publishing world helps.
It has been EXTREMELY easy to see this in the case of COVID-19, because not only is the COVID “scam” a bit of a rush job, but the CCP narratives have been very obvious.
First let me simply cite the entire hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) travesty, where CCP interference was run mostly through (1) the UN, WHO, and Tedros, (2) science journals which have huge exposures vis-a-vis China and Chinese publisher entanglements, and (3) the pharmaceutical industry, also highly compromised by Chinese involvements. Were it not for the discovery of the murderous LancetGate Effect, wherein people in Switzerland, France and America provably DIED when HCQ was withdrawn and then reinstated, it’s possible that China would have gotten away with undermining a drug THEY were using inside China. Bear in mind – there is evidence that HCQ usage has been both popular AND promoted inside China, at the same time that various FRONT-FACES for China have deniably undermined the drug OUTSIDE of China. That, of course, matches other CCP behaviors, like travel restrictions INSIDE China but not to the outside.
This is simply a PATTERN with the CCP. Get used to it.
My biggest catch here was arguably that FIRST and really BAD scientific paper that ALLEGEDLY first supported masks, at an essential moment in their political advancement, based on terrible US state-by-state data then available. Even disregarding the bad underlying data – the problems of which were not known at that time – the authors committed a shocking number of egregious and grievous scientific sins in order to help prop up the narrative that “masks work”. This has been dealt with elsewhere by other scientists – I just bring your attention to this graph which literally mocks the very idea of “cause and effect” to its face. See if you can see what I mean. “Read the graph”, and see how THEY DID NOT.
The Chinese authors, in an American university, were not “following the data” to see where it led. They were NARRATIVE-FITTING. And this BAD work was in a PRESTIGIOUS JOURNAL.
I’m not claiming these Chinese authors were part of a conspiracy. I *AM* claiming that they were engaged in almost irresistible socialist virtue signalling to a media narrative, according to the known psychology of people exposed to – and trained by – Chinese communism. And, increasingly, by American communism.
It is a subtle difference, between conspiracy and conformity, or really between EITHER ONE and a conspiracy to generate conformity, which IS communism, but it is something that Americans will have to begin to understand, as we begin to pry REAL science from the mouth of the dragon.
Now, if you go out and look for it, you will find all kinds of Chinese science that rushes out to support media narratives on COVID-19. Not universally, but enough. It’s a TWO-WAY STREET. The media will PICK and HIGHLIGHT virtue-signalling work that conforms to its desired narrative, so that “the winner” is not picked by science, but by the media. It really is a sweet scam.
The trouble is, however, that sometimes the “meeting of the narrative” is simply overdone – it becomes ridiculous. In some cases, the CCP will “crow” too loudly over a self-demeaning victim. In others, the victim will rush out SO HARD to the narrative, for virtue signal points, that they self-demean at humorous levels.
Horrible optics indeed.
MASKS are a strong part of this psychology, but it goes far deeper. CCP virtue-signalers will self-debase in the most remarkable ways.
Sometimes you can play along with this virtue signalling for personal advantage. For instance, because my lungs have been damaged by the China Virus, masks give me nasty hypoxia, pushing my limited oxygenation ability over the edge. My solution is to wear a super-dorky face shield INSTEAD of a mask.
People know in their hearts that whatever weird spit-spray-blocking utility masks may have – and there is some, undoubtedly – it is obviously not as strong with face shields. HOWEVER, face shields are far more dorky, stupid, and self-debasing. They are a STRONGER virtue signal than a mask like everybody else is wearing. So by using a STRONGER virtue signal that is less effective but easier on my ultimate victim status as a COVID recoveree, I basically grant myself some “COVID privilege”.
It’s all BULLSHIT – but I go along with it, to go easy on my lungs, and to not give my enemies a chance to generate a conflict scenario, were I not wearing a mask at all.
NOW – let’s get to the biggie – the example par excellence of scientific virtue signalling to China on COVID-19.
This science-world self-debasement is entirely analogous to two art-world analogs – pinnacles of cultural debasement of Western art, those being the “golden anti-Trump toilet” and the “giant artwork vagina of Versailles” – two of the most extreme cultural Marxist societal debasements in existence.
This scientific paper – renamed by Wolf Moon to translate into its CCP-over-USA ChiNazi political reality – is:
“Why Americans should not flush the toilet, to keep from spreading COVID-19”
I am not kidding you.
THIS work is featured in Molenium Magazine (i.e., C&EN) immediately after the same highly worthy work on mutated spike proteins that I just told you about, and that is leading to successful vaccines. Both articles are 3 pages long – yet they tell such different tales.
First, the HIGH ROAD OF SCIENCE – what China steals. Then, the LOW ROAD OF SCIENCE – what China leaves on our doorstep in a flaming bag.
The first article describes vaccine work that can FREE US from the stupidity of COVID-19 lockdowns.
This work, in contrast, is perfectly set up to give CCP-controlled communist Democrats a veritable softball of concern to start regulating our TOILETS in new and even stupider ways than they already have.
“SOLAR TOILET AIR RECYCLING PUMPS [MADE IN CHINA] WORK!”
Yes, I can hear it now. FAKE SCIENCE breeds FAKE TECH while CHINA GETS AHEAD.
Just STOP for a moment and realize how much this is like the ChiCom who derailed our technical meetings with picayune concerns that WORKED on STUPID AMERICANS.
There haven’t been any confirmed cases of people catching COVID-19 through exposure to the virus from feces or urine. But some researchers—and many people who need to find a bathroom while on the road—wonder if public toilets pose an infection risk.
Earlier this year, Yun-Yun Li, Ji-Xiang Wang, and Xi Chen at Southeast University were concerned about this exact question and used computational fluid dynamics models to determine how flushing the toilet can drive water from the toilet bowl into the air. According to their model, a flushing toilet generates a cloud of thousands of aerosol droplets that rises about a meter into the air if the lid is up (Phys. Fluids 2020, DOI: 10.1063/5.0013318). They also modeled how urinal flushing can produce aerosols (Phys. Fluids 2020, DOI: 10.1063/5.0021450). These weren’t the first studies to show that flushing generates aerosols, but the researchers hoped their models might nudge the public to consider bathroom hygiene more during the pandemic.
This picture says it all:
OK, maybe not. Maybe THIS ONE says it all.
The best part? TWO PAGES LATER, a paid insert for a Chinese university, AUTHORED by a staff writer for C&EN.
Look. It’s time to stop being FOOLS. The CCP will DESTROY whatever it cannot be. And it cannot be good, so it must DESTROY good. It is already destroying science with politics. The CCP doesn’t care if the publicly “agreed” climate science is a CROCK. All it cares about is that IT knows the truth, and plans accordingly, while everybody else is MISLED.
The CCP will try to MISLEAD Western science by HOOK or by CROOK. Wake up, and TURN IT OFF.
This [Q-3]TH of AUGUST FRIDAY open thread is OPEN – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA / KAG! / KMAG world (KMAG being a bit of both MAGA and KAG!).
We're big over the target on this one!
PREDICTION: The #LancetGate effect of increases in both DEATHS and INFECTIONS upon banning of #HCQ will show up in all countries that reacted to the paper, including several which have not been publicly mentioned yet.
You can say what you want, comment on what other people said, and so on.
Free Speech is practiced here. ENJOY IT. Use it or lose it.
Keep it SOMEWHAT civil. They tried to FORCE fake Orwellian civility on us. In response, we CHOOSE true civility to defend our precious FREEDOM from THEM.
Our rules began with the civility of the Old Treehouse, later to become the Wolverinian Empire, and one might say that we have RESTORED THE OLD REPUBLIC – the early high-interaction model of the Treehouse – except of course that Q discussion is not only allowed but encouraged, and speech is considerably freer in other ways. Please feel free to argue and disagree with the board owner, as nicely as possible.
Please also consider the Important Guidelines, outlined here in the OLD January 1st , 2019 open thread. Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven.
SPEAK THE FIVE WORDS BOLDLY TO OUR PRESIDENT!
“I AM PRAYING FOR YOU!“
AND WHAT TIME IS IT?
TIME TO….
DRAIN THE SWAMP
Our movement
Is about replacing
A failed
And CORRUPT
Political establishment
With a new government controlled
By you, the American People.
Candidate Donald J. Trump
Also remember Wheatie’s Rules:
No food fights.
No running with scissors.
If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.
Little Boy, Fat Man & The Sundance Kid
OK – we have a problem. Sundance’s reveal, undoubtedly a NUKE of Eeyore proportions, is coming soon.
Many of us want to talk about “Sundance stuff”, which tends toward DOWNSIDE THINKING.
I will agree that SD does not do “mea culpa” well, or even “at all”!!!
I believe SD’s point about Mueller team control is not going to convince those who don’t see “control from below” as control. SD’s mind lives inside DOJ structure, and not everybody can or even wants to follow him there, but in a DOJ-centric problem, I gladly adopt his framework of seeing things, because it works like crazy for me, too.
Sundance’s warm-up revelation about Tash Gauhar is solving all sorts of problems for me, and is also enough of a reveal of the SERIOUSNESS of the long-term problems at DOJ, that I am on board with SD’s reveal JUST ON THAT ALONE. His big reveal (not the Durham deputy – the OTHER reveal) HAS TO BE in the space I’m computing, and that space is dangerous as hell to America, and must be revealed before the election, whether Barr is going after it or not. I’m not fully sure what it is, but just the SET OF POSSIBLES is enough that any sunlight becomes good sunlight, Barr or no Barr. IMO.
TheseTruths
I do see control from below as control. I would very much like to know more of your thoughts about your last paragraph. An article about that would be great (if I may be so bold!)!
"Durham" is the shiny thing to keep everyone distracted and looking in the wrong place. The real investigation has nothing Durham attached to it. You can debate the Barr strategy later on. I care not. https://t.co/vxmc9lUKqF
SD is also saying that he will reveal to selected journalists on FRIDAY, and will reveal to US on Saturday.
NOW – here is my problem.
Not everybody here wants to see Sundance stuff, which can be – WELL – for many people, especially Q people, demoralizing. I expect his reveal to be BEYOND controversial – I believe it will OFFEND and OUTRAGE, drawing mockery and derision, even if people claim it’s a nothingburger. It will stir the pot – as intended.
So I’m going to make three proposals about where I will discuss “Sundance stuff”.
keep it in the daily open – DEAL WITH IT – FIGHT OVER IT
separate posts, NOT in the daily open – KEEP IT AWAY
on The U Tree
I can live with any of these, but I currently believe “other posts here” is the best for all concerned. Let me know what you all think. It will happen before morning.
Thanks!
The LancetGateEffect
Repeating from last week, I continue to harp on the “LancetGate Effect”.
This is the article that brought it to my attention:
I alerted administration HCQ advocate Peter Navarro to this (having no idea if he saw my tweet – only TWITTER and the DNC and the CCP know), because I think there is a “knowledge crisis” here. Waiting too long for published data (by the same publications which were victimized by LancetGate, no less!) showing we’re killing people by letting the media badmouth a “best current early treatment”, is a RISK to many – science, the people, AND this administration – maybe even to its enemies, who will ultimately pay for an increasingly costly crime.
Peter – another "real time effect" exists for the FDA 6/15 decision. It's also a "LancetGate" effect, ironically started AFTER Swiss reinstatement of #HCQ on 6/11. Different delay – the shorter time from infection to viral test. Amazing proof. READ: https://t.co/lDV7XMyGzbpic.twitter.com/owqX6AMPUD
For those who are put off by the reciprocal graph, here is the data viewed more traditionally. Same point – a causally timed inflection point in cases when shadow is thrown on #HCQ by the out-of-date 6/15 (retracted) #LancetGate diss during rescinding of the EUA by FDA. pic.twitter.com/0FXd20tiMT
I really think we need to thoroughly explore this possible ‘TRAP’ (Damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t) so we understand it.
Gingersmom2009 earlier was saying that President Trump is ‘Weak’ because he did not use an E.O. to overrule the ANTI-HCQ SABOTEURS in the CDC, FDA….
… I and don’t want to be that floating turd — but someone was pretty strident here in a reply to me yesterday AM about the Stanton Act and how POTUS can’t go against Fauci/Birx or he’ll be removed from office. The EUA is exactly what needs to happen….
That was me.
DP, Ginger, and others.
Causualties in nursing homes was done PRECISELY to get the reaction you have. These people have spent over 100 years perfecting the methods of ‘herding you’ into the direction they want you to go
AND THEY ARE PURE EVIL….. [start of a long comment]
[MUCH REMOVED]
I can understand why DP, Ginger, and others are furious and want POTUS to DO SOMETHING! I am livid too. I am so angry that if a Karen demonrat gets in my face about masks I would probably punch them…
HOWEVER, I can step back and I THINK I SEE A TRAP.
So what say you?
Is POTUS sidestepping a trap? Or is he ‘weak’ in not using an E.O. to address the HCQ issue?
THIS is a beautiful demonstration of how politics and science are interacting BADLY, and why we need to keep both politics and corporate money OUT of influencing science judgments.
We will deal with part of this below, in something I call “therapeutic agnosticism”.
For now, I think it’s very legitimate to ask about Trump’s relationship with both the health bureaucracy – much of which OPPOSES HIM and SUPPORTED HILLARY CLINTON – and with the corporate and NGO behemoths – much of that world controlled by Bill Gates – and most of which is also politically opposed to Trump.
I think that the other side will weaponize ANYTHING, and yes – I think they may well have been trying to trap Trump on HCQ.
In my opinion President Trump has done enough. He has been honest about his belief in HCQ, but he is letting the medical pros make decisions, and they will answer for any mistakes.
If FDA scientists don’t reverse course on HCQ due to the LancetGateEffect, and the evidence keeps rolling in, then I believe Azar and Hahn will have all they need to clean the place out very soon.
There are constructive paths forward – I’ve suggested one already, but there are others. Any EUA or other action which broad-brushes early use of more antivirals and explicitly includes HCQ is fairly absolving without spotlighting, and serves the interests of both “big pharma” and “people’s pharma”.
Note that remdesivir has been approved for more widespread use. If that use can be moved forward in time, such as allowing an early bolus injection “somewhat off label” or EUAed under doctor’s supervision, early in HCQ COVID treatment, and it gives improved results (I would almost bet on it), then patients, doctors, and researchers all benefit. Likewise, EIDD-2801 and RLF-100 need to be tried earlier, IMO.
Yes, to some extent this is expensive “boutique medicine”, adding big costs for small percentages of better outcomes, but honestly, THAT is exactly why people have private insurance and THEIR OWN preferred providers and drugs. Research is expensive, well-heeled customers who will spare no expense WANT that extra edge, so it’s a match made in capitalism.
If the MONEY can get these new fresh drugs WHEN THEY NEED THEM, and those who want cheap and reliable HCQ can get THAT when they need it, then hopefully we can all benefit – most of all insuring that patients are not dying of this minor but annoying flu which – I have to say on now-sketchy lungs – is not exactly as minor as the usual coughs and colds, even if it is, for most, more minor than regular flu.
So let’s talk about therapeutics in general, but FIRST just one of them.
Ivermectin & COVID-19
Thanks to bakocarl for turning me on to this article, which has proven very enlightening as I’ve dealt with the PROCESS of understanding it at a general level.
I had promised that I would do an explainer on this, and to some extent I already did, in comments, but I want to get some deeper thoughts out there. Also, this topic brings up the issue of “therapeutic agnosticism”. This is about not just STATING conflicts of interest in backing or not backing particular therapeutics, but DEALING with those conflicts – ADDRESSING THEM – very openly. Thus, I explain this idea more fully below.
If you search through the whole article, you will NOT find zinc mentioned AT ALL, and any time zinc is not controlled, an HCQ or HCQ+AZT study is operating with a loose wheel, in my opinion.
This becomes even more important because of the way the CONTROL for the ivermecting (IVM) add-on was done.
The control study for IVM+HCQ+AZT was done by RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS of earlier hospital treatment using HCQ+AZT alone. The authors understand fully the limitations of doing this, and I agree with them fully – it is better to do a potentially flawed study here than none at all. There is a strong ETHICAL argument for comparing PAST BEST to NEW BEST – and one doesn’t have to invoke Melania to know it’s right – DOING BEST is BEING BEST!
Using dice to send some patients to WORSE TREATMENT is not a braggable thing. Better to take some lumps on uncertainty, IMO.
What are the risks of comparing two hospital studies NOT done at the same time – where one of them is designated a “control”?
“Control” assumes that you’ve changed exactly what you know you changed – it means that you have a reliable reference, preferably MINIMIZING differences that have to be explained away.
Yes, it’s the same hospital, the same doctors, the same staff, but we all know that treatment for COVID has changed MASSIVELY over time. Here are important changes:
less vents
more steroids
better diet including vitamins and minerals to resolve deficiencies
more oxygen earlier
better testing, all kinds
As you can see, there are reasons for outcomes to be better now, completely independent of the study object, ivermectin. NEVERTHELESS, the authors DO see better results – significantly better – if they give patients a big dose of IVM at the beginning of HCQ-AZT treatment. They do as much correcting for differences as they can, in comparing individual outcomes, and I believe they tried to do a good job.
Skipping past how I got there, my reading of this is that IVM is very likely acting a LOT like AZT (azithromycin, Z-pak, AZM, whatever). It is providing a SHOTGUN for unicellular and multicellular organisms, weighted toward PARASITES. It has a different SPECTRUM from AZT, and will complement it. This will affect both pre-existing and new infections.
It is EXTREMELY LIKELY that this should work, even if IVM has NO ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY.
It’s beautiful science – and also explains why the “pro-crisis” camp would oppose use of ivermectin.
The argument isn’t whether ivermectin is an antiviral, or any worse or better than anything else. The argument is whether is can be used to save lives, and how well it does that, versus something else – including simply NOT USING IT.
If these results hold, or are even partially confirmed, then I think ivermectin needs an EUA along with HCQ and several other new antivirals, for doctors to begin solving things EARLY with antivirals and “therapeutic adjuvants”, when they work best, as I mentioned LAST WEEK.
Now, let’s talk about therapeutic agnosticism.
On Staying Therapeutically Agnostic
Now – we have seen incredible bias against hydroxychloroquine – nicely summarized HERE:
Dr. Harvey Risch, MD/PhD from the department of epidemiology at Yale responds to the senseless attack and attempt to discredit him for his research on hydroxychloroquine.
If you get into that article, you will see where “the powers that be” try to KNEECAP hydroxychloroquine into “hospital use only” – which absolutely does not make sense, until you realize that one of the more unique problems of the new and just recently approved antiviral drug remdesivir (which Fauci labeled the “new standard” despite unimpressive performance in late-stage COVID), is that the drug needs to not only be administered by IV, but it also has to be observed closely for nasty side effects, and thus being up until recently stuck in a late stage, hospital patient track, which is NOT a good place for antiviral success.
SO – rather than getting remdesivir into earlier settings, what did they do? What the CHICOMS routinely do – KNEECAP THE COMPETITION in some way that nobody sees.
Honestly, if you’ve been in science and been halfway observant, you’ve seen how the corrupt ChiComs operate – MAFIA techniques – frequently SABOTAGING the other guy, although perhaps not until AFTER stealing the technology – so they seem to be quite comfy with the general lack of morality of the growing “medical mafia” in the US.
A match made in HELL.
Anyway – here is the deal.
We do NOT want to be like them THE OTHER WAY.
don’t cheer the failure of ANY drug – figure it out and fix it
every drug is different – help them ALL find their perfect niche to help us
never ever conduct a sabotage study like LancetGate
don’t reject studies “going the other way” – UNDERSTAND AND EXPLAIN THEM
call out sabotage, bias and error, no matter who is committing it
if you know why “the other guy’s drug” is FAILING, you are morally obligated to help fix it
if you know why “the other guy’s drug” is WORKING, you are morally obligated to explain and even recommend it
pharmacology is not a zero sum game, even though patients are a zero sum market – every new drug adds to the arsenal of salvation
In short, I wish for people who are fighting the suppression of HCQ to not become deniers, defamers, and “opponents” of other drugs and vaccines, because doctors need those too, for patients who want or need those specific drugs or treatments.
LIVE AND LET LIVE.
Even if the other team doesn’t play that way.
By this attitude, we will DEMONSTRATE the superiority of our approach, which I sometimes call POPULAR MEDICINE.
Masks OFF
The fly in the ointment that mocks the smooth, lying MASK SOCIALISTS is SWEDEN.
“With numbers diminishing very quickly in Sweden, we see no point in wearing a face mask in Sweden, not even on public transport.” -Swedish State Epidemiologist Anders Tegnell, 7/28/20
This wonderful meme comes from Aubergine. I also used it HERE:
Wake up! I can MEASURE my oxygen hurt by all 3 of my masks, using my pulse oximeter. It's mild, but it's persistent and long. 97 (sleepy) is not 98 (calm) is not 99 (alert), and 93 is where they take you to the hospital.
We need to start thinking about measuring things, because I am CERTAIN that masks are hurting us – nickeling and diming us to death.
I am having success understanding oxygen deprivation using my cheap oximeter, but I need perhaps a more expensive model to take finer cumulative readings and record them.
Gail Combs suggests that we can capture mask CO2 as well.
Let us think about this problem, because I am certain that CHINA is behind it.
I will add details later of why I believe normal mask wear leads to cognitive deficits for 30-60 minutes AFTER shopping with a mask.
