“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
Follow along as Gail Combs digs down a snake-infested rabbit hole from something that Dr. Robert Malone mentioned on Joe Rogan.
Once you understand how much preparation went into what is going on RIGHT NOW, you’ll realize that all the usual suspects had a plan, and it’s exactly what we’re seeing now, except they weren’t banking on us understanding their criminal conspiracy.
2:40:50 “We are in an environment where truth and consequences are fungible. This is Modern media management and warfare. The Truth is what those that are managing ‘The Trusted News Initiative’ say it is. “
How news organisations can rebuild trust and tackle the next disinformation challenges.
Trust In News
The BBC’s Trusted News Initiative is a partnership that includes organisations such as Facebook, Twitter, Reuters and The Washington Post. It is the only forum in the world of its kind designed to take on disinformation in real time. Now we and our partners are going to share what we’ve all learned about how to tackle disinformation, and you are invited.
In this August 13, 2021 article for Global Research, Elizabeth Woodworth explains how the Trusted News Initiative (TNI) was formed and what it means to our modern society.
According to Woodsworth, even before the pandemic, there has been a continued increase in public distrust to mainstream media. The TNI began in July 2019 when BBC Director-General Tony Hall convened various media companies and Big Tech companies to “arrive at a practical set of actions we can take together, right now, to tackle the rise of misinformation and bias…[by creating a] global alliance for integrity in news…to promote freedom and democracy worldwide”.
From the beginning, the goal of TNI was to counter “anti-vaxxers [who] were gaining traction on social media as a part of a “fake news” movement spreading “misleading and dangerous information”….
TNI has become an instrumental tool for the suppression of life-saving information….
8 October The state department prevents Gordon Sondland, US ambassador to the EU and a Trump donor, from testifying to a congressional impeachment hearing.
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.
Top U.S. military athletes are competing against their counterparts from more than 100 nations during the 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan, China, Oct. 18-28.
The 2019 Military World Games, branded the “Peace Games,” was the largest military sports event ever held in China. More than 9,000 athletes representing the militaries of more than 100 countries competed in 27 sports…
On July 21, 2021, Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. broke the news on The Gateway Pundit from a China source that the release of COVID-19 at the 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan was a test of the longer-term effects of that type of bioweapon because foreign visitors to the Games would carry it back to their own countries and the consequences could be observed. . .
Michael Worobey, head of the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Arizona, wrote in a piece published in the journal Science that a female seafood vendor who worked at the live animal market in Wuhan and became ill on Dec. 11, 2019, was likely the first known case of COVID-19.
December 31, 2019 The World Health Organization China Country Office is informed of a number cases of pneumonia of unknown etiology…
January 2, 2020 The World Health Organization activates its incident management system…
January 5, 2020 CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) activates a Center Level Response…
January 7, 2020 Chinese authorities identify and isolate a novel coronavirus….
January 7, 2020 CDC establishes a 2019-nCoV Incident Management Structure to guide the response….
[January 16, 2020 – Articles delivered & Impeachment Trial began in the Senate] January 17, 2020 CDC begins screening passengers on direct and connecting flights from Wuhan, China
January 17, 2020 CDC deploys a team to Washington state to assist with contact tracing efforts in response to the first reported case
January 20, 2020 CDC confirms the first U.S. laboratory-confirmed case of COVID-19 in the U.S.
January 21, 2020 CDC transitions from a Center-led Incident Management Structure to an Agency-wide Structure and activates its Emergency Response System
[January 25, 2021, House impeachment managers delivered the article of impeachment to the U.S. Senate.]
The Timeline seems to indicate that President Trump was kept distracted while the Democrats and Mr Global put the pieces in place to unleash the Plandemic and force the world to take the clot shot.
…………….
The NUREMBERG CODE is worth rereading before we go down into the snake pit.
While Collins, Fauci, hospitals and medical boards moved to silence and censor ALL opinions by dissenting experts, the Trusted News Initiative also muzzled anyone else not advocating for the Clot Shot. However Mr Global went even further than censorship and threatening jobs and medical licenses.
TEN NIH STUDIES ON ‘VACCINE REFUSAL’
‘Vaccine Refusal’ is considered a ‘condition or disease’ that needs ‘treatment’ The following are trials to determine how to convince brainwash people into consenting to taking an experimental drug WITHOUT giving them full disclosure.
She was mostly raised by her Chinese grandmother, who spoke no English. She was a very dignified woman who clearly was a huge influence in Priscilla’s life…. But the precise details of how the family arrived in America are unclear.Reports in China say they came originally from the city of Xuzhou in eastern Chandong province, also the home city of Rupert Murdoch’s wife Wendi Deng. Others say that the family lived in Nanjing, an industrial town 150 miles west of Shanghai, before leaving to live first in Hong Kong and later in the US.
A source at the Asian-American Civic Association in Boston said it was ‘highly likely’ the family spent time in a refugee camp, either in Hong Kong or on arrival in the US.
Priscilla’s father said he was a refugee who had lived in Vietnam, according to Thai-born Napat
Records show Dennis,[Her father] who now owns a small wholesale fish business, was given a social security number as an ‘Asian Refugee’ between April 1975 and November 1979.
Code3
Stanford University
Harvard University
YaleUniversity
Johns HopkinsUniversity
Massachusetts General Hospital
Ludwig-Maximilians – University of Munich
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Study Description
Brief Summary:
This study will distribute videos of health professionals encouraging Covid-19 vaccination to a large sample of Facebook users, and will test the most effective ways to maximize diffusion of this vaccine-related content to increase vaccination rates. The study sample will be U.S. states where vaccination rates remained low in fall 2021. The experimental design is an RCT with 4 groups, randomized at the county level: 1) a control group which receives no intervention, 2) a treatment group in which Facebook users receive ads which include videos of health professionals telling them to get vaccinated, 3) a treatment group in which Facebook users receive ads which include videos of health professionals encouraging them to help their friends to get vaccinated, and 4) a treatment group in which Facebook users receive ads which include videos of health professionals encouraging them to get their most influential friends to help their friends get vaccinated. In treatments 3 and 4, participants will have the option to sign up to be a “vaccine ambassador,” in which case they will get notifications when the study team posts new vaccine-related content, and will receive reminders about encouraging their friends to be vaccinated. The vaccine ambassadors will also be entered into a lottery to win prizes. The study team is building a website to host the videos of health professionals which answer common questions about Covid-19 vaccination. The investigators will measure engagement with the vaccine-related content as well as assess effects on vaccination rates at the county level.
Interventional (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment :
40,000,000 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
There are four arms in the study which geographic areas are assigned to in parallel. The geographic areas in the three treatment arms will receive a Facebook ad campaign over the same time period to one another.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Increasing the Effectiveness and Diffusion of COVID-19 Messaging for Vaccination
Behavioral: Online Social Network and Collective Intelligence Intervention :
Behavioral: Independent Control
Collaborators: University of California, Davis, University of California, San Francisco, University of California, Berkeley
Brief Summary:
Social technologies for health have already become essential means for providing underserved populations greater social connectedness and increased access to novel health information. However, these technologies have also had negative unintended consequences. The resulting digital divide in social technology takes many forms – from explicit racism that excludes African American and Latinx populations from the resources enjoyed by White and Asian members of online communities, to self-segregation for the purposes of identity preservation and community-building that unintentionally results in limited informational diversity in underserved communities. The result is an often unnoticed, but highly consequential compounding of inequities.
This research seeks to use an online social network approach to address these challenges, in which the investigators demonstrate how reducing the online levels of network centralization and network homophily among African American community members directly increases their productive engagement with health-promoting information.
San Ysidro Health Care View Health Center, San Diego, CA; and 3 more…
Principal Investigator: Argentina Servin, MD, MPH, Asst Prof,
Sponsors/Collaborators National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
Behavioral: COVID-19 Individual Awareness and Education;
Behavioral: COVID-19 Community Outreach & Health Promotion;
Behavioral: COVID-19 Individual Health Education & Linkages to Medical and Supportive Services;
Biological: Pop-up community vaccination sites
-GC
Conclusion by Wolf Moon
Do you see it now? They knew exactly what they were doing. Schiff’s kabuki with Zuckerberg was like a GO signal to start the censorship.
That creepy pedophile loser, the compromised Dem Rep on the committee that’s SUPPOSED to control the IC, but is in fact CONTROLLED BY IT, signals to the IC social media that’s SUPPOSED to serve us, but in fact SERVES THE IC, that they need to start censoring us by removing InfoWars and Natural News.
It ALL makes sense now.
CHICOMS. These people are no better than CHICOMS. Allies of the enemies of America. Traitors of the worst kind.
Yeah, we still have staffing problems, but who doesn’t under China Joe?
While off to a rocky start, we are staying open as many days of the week as possible, just like some of the small businesses that I patronize.
Keep up that LOCAL PRESSURE on the Biden cabal by going to school board meetings and supporting TRUE non-monopoly capitalism – it SKEERS Kapo and Little Red Jen somethin’ FIERCE.
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays! To the White House press– thank you for challenging us, for questioning and for holding us accountable as we all work to keep the American people informed. And to the press team–you are simply the best. Grateful every day to work with you. pic.twitter.com/xxBwLMzh2L
Likewise, patronize those SMALL BLOGS that provide new viewpoints and ideas!
We Serve Whiskey And Guns To Indians Here!
Yup! FREEDOM is GOOD TROUBLE, and we’re in favor of it, for everybody, much to the consternation of our local maskies and vaxxies.
I had the special pleasure of being “refused service” by a maskie recently – he simply walked away from the cash register and went into the back. Some of it was due to race. Having been “not served” because of race before, I can spot that fairly easily, and this person was not exactly “hard to read”.
Three other staffers (all forced to wear masks, sadly) came to my assistance and took my order.
I maintained a pleasant demeanor, as part of one of several psychological warfare tactics that I have adopted recently, in fighting against the VAXZIS and MASKZIS.
While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.
So what’s on the ODD BAR’S CRAZY MENU this week?
We’ve served alcohols our first week, including menthol, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine.
Next, we served amines , including second generation antihistamines.
Today, we’ll toast each other with an element that we’ll borrow from Steve…..
…..and some very special natural alcohols and derivatives, including among the 4 of them, 3 terpenoids, 2 phenols, 1 ester, and 1 ether.
More on these wonderful “liqueurs” later!
Christmas Spirit
There’s still time to spread omicron! GET BUSY!!!
While we do have some members out with Omicron now, including Brave and Free, the real question is whether we’re going to see a big peak in March and April, like we did in 2020.
And if you’re gonna get sick, you might at least consider having some willing cohort, looking for that natural immunity, to get sick with you!
Ah, thanks to SMILEY for reminding me of the goofy fun of these wonderful but stupid GIFs called “Blingees”!
And now, the rules of the pub.
HOUSE RULES
God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.
Now, back to business.
AMEN!
Current Art On The Wall
Now for something a bit different…..
Vector background. Molecules and chemical formulas
…..and something a bit more familiar.
David Teniers the Younger (1610–1690), The Alchemist, ca. 1643–45. Oil on panel, 20 1/8 x 28 in (51 x 71 cm). Herzog Anton Ulrich Museum, Braunschweig (139)
As one of the early “discoverers” of The Ethical Skeptic on Twitter, I was happy that I was able to get a few people interested in his precise and well-considered thoughts on things – especially regarding the phony scamdemic. TES was always utterly perturbed by the bad science of the “pandemic”, and worked on a daily basis to “correct the fact checkers” – which was all of hilarious, sad, and joyful.
After I was kicked off Twitter, I rarely saw him, due to my own laziness, really, but in 2021, some GREAT links to The Ethical Skeptic’s work popped up here. THANK YOU, to all who follow him and keep us informed.
This one got us all thinking about “coof kits”, and GA/FL suggested some of us putting up our own versions. I initially thought that this might not be a good idea, because people’s needs and medical situations really VARY – one of the main reasons that “practicing medicine without a license” is actually a bad idea in normal times. I thought it better to have a broader discussion.
However, I just realized that I did put up a kind of “minimal” kit last week, and it’s worth looking at it.
This kit was designed for people who DON’T have a smart plan already figured out, and don’t want to investigate “hard to find” things like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
Here is what I had, followed by my earlier reasoning. The main change is adding Vitamin C, as discussed below.
Wolf’s COVID Care Package
Thermometer (thermal digital is easiest)
Antigen test kit(s) (yeah, good luck finding one, although they are coming back after New Years)
Antihistamine of your choice (Claritin, Zyrtec, and Allegra are the easiest – 1-2 a day)
Aspirin (regular, or low-dose if your stomach doesn’t like it – 1 a day)
Listerine or Betadine mouthwash/gargle for mouth and throat
Vitamins C and D, Zinc, Calcium, Magnesium, Multivitamin including Selenium.
Quercetin (including natural sources) or Green Tea
Saline or other nasal spray, rinse, or wash of your choice
The thermometer tells you when to use your precious test kit – when you suddenly have a fever and a sore or tingly throat.
The test kit gets you a positive diagnosis that opens doors for things like antibodies, or an official test.
A positive test means you can BEGIN TREATMENT at THERAPEUTIC DOSES.
The antihistamine insures that YOU WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY NOT DIE, because it stops the second, allergic, inflammatory stage of COVID in its tracks.
The aspirin makes doubly sure you won’t get clots, but be careful – don’t take it if you’ve had trouble with aspirin. Talk to your doctor if unsure.
The gargles (Listerine or Betadine) massively reduce viral load and speed time to recovery.
The saline and nasal washes lower viral load, and maintain nasal breathing.
The quercetin and green tea help zinc’s antiviral action by increasing cellular zinc levels.
The vitamins and mineral supplements keep you at antiviral levels of these things. In particular, zinc and vitamin D3 need to be at non-deficient levels.
Please consult authoritative sources from TRUE medical doctors like the ones at https://flccc.net.
Cthulhu noted that I hadn’t mentioned Vitamin C – I have now added that, because it’s likely to help and can’t hurt (“First, do no harm”) and also follows the McCullough Principle (“Signals of Benefit, Acceptable Safety”). I don’t think it’s nearly as important as the antihistamine and “clot-blocker”, but I do have to admit that Vitamin C was certainly far better than nothing when I survived Wuhan with only mild lung damage.
What I’m going to do now is to encourage all of YOU to talk about your “war chests” and “coof kits”, and explain your reasonings about things.
This will help people who are deciding what THEY might want to add to their kits – OR REMOVE, if there is something better for their particular situation.
Remember – everybody has their own unique medical needs.
I will put my thoughts in the comments, just like everybody else.
NOW – about those natural “essential oils” in Listerine.
Let’s look at them.
Menthol
Thymol
Eucalyptol (2 views)
Methyl salicylate
These are all natural substances of roughly the same molecular size and composition (mostly carbon and hydrogen with 1-3 oxygen atoms), all of them being either pungent oily liquids or smelly, vaporous crystalline solids.
There are some relations between these things.
Thymol is basically menthol where the 6-membered ring has been made benzenoid – meaning like benzene – with 3 double bonds.
Notice that methyl salicylate is also benzenoid. Methyl salicylate is related to aspirin, and has similar activities. Don’t drink Listerine, even though the amounts are (believe it or not) rather small.
Eucalyptol is also structurally related to menthol, although it’s harder to see. Try to see it.
All of these natural substances, when isolated from their sources, were very early pharmaceuticals. They ALL have pharmacological activities, which many would regard as “primitive” by today’s standards, and yet, gargling Listerine is PROVEN to be extremely effective in reducing viral load of COVID-19 variants – about 80% as effective as iodine solutions.
Why might this be? Here is just ONE small line of immunological evidence.
To be honest, we’re a bit late to the game here. Native Australians from the first wave of immigration, roughly 65,000 years ago, discovered the utility of eucalyptol by their own investigations.
There is a great picture of what is essentially a native doctor’s medical bag in the second link. When it freaks you out a bit, let it. This is a way of getting you to appreciate human intelligence outside your modern experience.
Lastly – IODINE.
I have not tried this, and I am not sure I would like it, but it’s a viable option, IMO. I actually like Listerine, and it worked for me on delta, so I’m happy with that. I did NOT try Listerine in the nasal cavity. Not sure that I’d like that. I stuck to saline.
I did find a paper that showed Listerine to be roughly 80% as effective as povidone-iodine.
Here is link to a review which states something similar, and a summary of the review.
A review of literature was conducted regarding the use of commercially available antiseptics and SARS-CoV-2.
Results
Povidone-iodine (betadine), ethanol and essential oils (Listerine) and a combination of xylitol and iota-carrageenan (purified from red marine algae) were shown to reduce viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro by 3–4 log10 in 30 s.
Chlorhexidine, a widely used oral rinse, does not act as quickly in reducing viral load in 30 s as povidone-iodineI, but binds to cell proteins, extending protection.
Hydrogen peroxide is not as effective as other oral rinses in vitro and cell toxicity is a concern.
Hypertonic saline is not directly virucidal, but halts replication by increasing hypochlorous acid inside the cell.
Conclusion
Several commonly used nasal antiseptics and gargles have shown efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and clinical trials are currently underway to study their impact on disease course and transmission.
Future perspective
These commercially available products should be further evaluated due to their potential ability to reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses that are yet to emerge.
You can also make your own povidone-iodine gargles and nasal rinses – Dr. McCullough has retweeted a nice recipe for this. Click through to Twitter for more information.
This is another GREAT article, talking about one of my FAVORITE complaints about modern science, which has resulted from a really SICK and UNHEALTHY compartmentalization, as well as insulation of scientists from internal criticism (lack of “herd review”). This condition has allowed all sorts of pathological science to gain ascendancy without check, balance, or proper community criticism.
For example, CLIMATE CHANGE gets more input from FINANCIERS than it does from the many scientists like me who think we are acting irrationally and presumptuously on ERRORS. These errors have been induced by the WRONG forces – beneficiaries not committed to truth – within a small pathologically influenced community – much like what’s going on with improperly influenced government science and the “clot shot”.
This piece by The Ethical Skeptic contains a graphic using a BULLSEYE which you really need to see. It makes a very important point about science – which I can apply DIRECTLY to Anthony Fauci.
Fauci’s extreme focus on antibodies to the spike protein as a nearly sole measure of “success” of the “clot shot”, is a perfect example of what TES is talking about.
I have referred to Fauci’s over-focus as “antibody hypnosis”. In fact, I see this kind of obsession and compulsion repeatedly throughout his career, and would wager that:
it’s why he always “wins” against the Judy Mikovitses and the Kary Mullises
it’s why he’s so highly paid
it’s why he’s tied to so many “grim reaper” experiments
it’s why corrupt industry loves him, and is in bed with him
TES makes a general point about the kinds of information which actually provide STRONGER PROOF – and this set includes something I love – INDEPENDENT CONFIRMATION BY ALTERNATE LINES OF REASONING – not just “duplication of results” and “confirmation of results” – which are both sadly lacking as well, but not nearly as important.
I have powerful, direct experiences in science with the need for RESOLVED DIVERSE INPUTS and AVOIDANCE OF HYPNOTIC REASONING as safeguards against pathological science.
However, THEY (and I mean “they”) are using various forms of hypnosis, including MASS, COMMUNITY, PEER, and INDIVIDUAL to advance science in ways that THEY want.
Human science is far more controlled than we either admit or understand.
Anyway, back to the article.
There is a quote from Elon Musk therein which is really worth your while, and which TES puts in the context of what he is talking about.
Bluntly, it feels wonderful to know that SOMEBODY GETS IT.
What Musk is talking about here is basically the “bullseye” metaphor that TES uses. And THAT is related to the following item.
While Fauci is very committed to the LEVELS of his antibodies, he has not properly processed feedback that would indicate he’s OPTIMIZING THE WRONG THING.
Here is a link to Steve Kirsch’s interpretation of Sucharit Bhakdi’s and Arne Burkhardt’s analysis of people who died after vaccination, showing that these deaths were ALMOST ALL related to the “clot shot”.
Kirsch REALLY explains this well. Malone takes note of this, too.
IMO, it would appear that Fauci is optimizing the WRONG ANTIBODIES in the WRONG WAY, because the vaccines are CREATING the WRONG ANTIBODIES in the WRONG PLACES.
Please read Kirsch’s article and then the Bhakdi-Burkhardt paper to understand this.
Now, Fauci may be optimizing the wrong antibodies in the wrong places for a variety of reasons. Those exact reasons are not nearly as important as the fact that they are simply WRONG.
I believe Bhakdi, Burkhardt, and Kirsch – this is a risky vaccine, and now we begin to understand WHY.
Based on this knowledge, I personally will not be taking these vaccines.
In my opinion, these results CLEARLY show that vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 should not be effected by IM injections of a full SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and even more emphatically so, NOT by genetic vaccines delivered by IM injections. In my very early opinion, this is going to be a CLASSIC case for using RBD antigen (protein) and/or nasal delivery as a concession to the virus – with nasal delivery being used as a SAFETY feature and NOT merely a convenience.
To have SAFER vaccines for DISCRIMINATING SHOPPERS like me, we’re going to have to compromise with the virus. That’s just the way it is.
There may be SOME who thought that we could arrive at a compromise that would reduce human populations, but frankly I don’t like that deal.
In my opinion, ANYBODY with vascular, cardiac, clotting, or other issues like WANTING TO HAVE KIDS SOMEDAY, or NOT RISKING CANCER, should absolutely avoid the current clot shots.
In my opinion, the clot shot is stupidity advanced by greedy people who are controlled and manipulated by really evil people. In other words, it’s not stupid, greedy, or evil – it’s ALL OF THE ABOVE.
The DISEASE is no picnic, and I can see some people making the risk-benefit calculation in favor of the vaccine – particularly newer RBD antigen vaccines like Corbevax (Hotez/Baylor/India/open-source). But if people are dying in 5 years from experimental mRNA vaccines with the full spike protein – well, that is exactly like the RISK that one takes with SMOKING SOMETHING YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND.
Seriously, most Americans would refuse to take a novel “legal” or illegal designer drug, given stories like the “bath salts” and “Parkinson’s heroin” experiences which shocked the public in horror headlines.
Parkinson’s from Designer Heroin (Ironically related to Paraquat)
This is what I really wanted to show you, right here.
The Ethical Skeptic, or TES, or “ThEthSkep“, as I sometimes call him, has proven to my satisfaction that CCP lied even MORE than we previously thought possible.
Is this hard to believe? That we got CHUMPED by CHINA yet again?
Yeah. Getting chumped by China YET AGAIN is a thing.
I am tempted to try to construct an “elevator pitch” of ThEthSkep’s argument, and have even asked him (in a moderated comment) if he could provide such a short explanation that I could pitch to others.
If he DOES provide one, I will do an entire post on it.
For the moment, I will just give you my “two paragraph description” of his very long and elegant post, which post I can guarantee most here will have trouble following.
TES argues that setting an earlier date for the actual initial Chinese release of an ancestral pathogen to current SARS-CoV-2, provides a far better explanation of the facts at hand, as well as some facts which he generated through analysis of the genetics of SARS-CoV-2 variants, than does the “standard model” of a late 2019 release, whether that late release is taken from the early Chinese LIES about a zoonotic outbreak in December 2019, or from the October 2019 Wuhan lab activities which have always struck me as potential disinformation.
In particular, an early 2018 release of a less pathogenic ancestor explains the omicron variant’s surprisingly early 2020 appearance and low pathogenicity so well, and China’s population resistance to the more pathogenic Wuhan variant, whether that was a descendant or (my thinking) a new release, that IMO it is the duty of the “standard model” to explain all of the facts better than the TES theory.
Now, like I said, this post by TES is not an easy read, even for those with some knowledge of the field, and even for those experienced in reading the scientific literature. He moves at “review speed” through a lot of reasoning and even his own work, which is not all shown, but which is all fully described and referenced.
I am actually WAITING for my first reading to fully sink in, but I can tell you this. As soon as I “freed myself” from the necessity of a late 2019 release, everything “coof” just started falling into place.
This is one of those things that starts generating RESETS in my mind, on everything I had thought before. Once you see what TES is getting at, it’s almost impossible to unsee it.
AND I CAN GO FURTHER.
I talk to a LOT of people, and listen carefully to their thinking about COVID. One of my sources is somebody who has a lot of contacts in Europe and Asia, especially India, due to working for an international firm.
That person strongly believes, based on illnesses within the corporation as well as associated entities, that something like COVID-19 was already circulating worldwide during ALL of 2019.
I had set this aside, unable to fit it into everything else I knew. NOW, however, it makes easy sense. In fact, the details which I don’t want to give, fit his model of spread EXACTLY.
If TES is correct, and I believe he is, then WE WERE DEALING WITH VARIANTS EVEN BEFORE THE CDC BEGAN TALKING ABOUT VARIANTS. In fact, they never told us that THE ORIGINAL WAS LIKELY JUST A VARIANT OF SOME PRIOR VARIANT.
And THIS explains much better why Fauci, Baric, Dazsak, and all the others were ready to cover up – because a virus related to their research had already gotten out in 2018. Going along with the Chinese story was a RELIEF to them – and they grabbed on tightly.
In other words, a conspiracy of aligning interests, not something discussed on paper or by phone. It’s a brilliant Chinese move, actually. Proffer a lie and see if our own scientists will join them in it.
The USEFUL IDIOT American media? NO PROBLEM.
And not just THAT stuff, but now we have much more evidence that these bugs could have been “in the wild” EVERYWHERE – including possibly just outside the Baric lab, near where Gail Combs picked up a “coofy” bug much earlier than would have been possible with a late 2019 release. (I will let her address the time-frames.)
Consider that China could even have been trying to FRAME or intimidate Baric with a stateside release in the vicinity of his lab. Why? Because NOW we have MOTIVE.
Does it make sense NOW that these highly contagious bugs could have been getting out willy-nilly from these laboratories? Or that China has been playing fast and loose with biological releases?
What does this mean?
It means that the whole NIH-Fauci-Wuhan complex has been in cover-up mode, trying to SAVE THEIR DANGEROUS RESEARCH which they know is VERY likely to be SHUT DOWN BY A CONGRESS RUN BY THE PEOPLE – no matter WHAT THE CAUSE OF THIS RELEASE.
Remember how I said the President Wolf Moon would send a cruise missile into every BSL level 4 that didn’t shut down immediately upon his inauguration? Those missiles armed with whatever insured that all viruses were FRIED?
See the motive to get rid of Trump now? WE THE PEOPLE cannot be allowed to interfere with their “holy” research.
And wait – there’s MOAR.
Somewhere in the years between 2005 and 2010, around the time I got an extremely SARS-CoV-2-like infection, complete with anosmia, exhaustion, and “sore lung”, I took note of the fact that all of my Asian colleagues in the “anti-CCP” camp became very religious about taking COVID-like precautions in our CCP-Chinese-infested workplace. These precautions included isolation, surface and aerosol measures, like wipes, air filters, and even clothing choices.
Most of us dismissed it as an “Asian thing” like masks, even though it was a sudden and new social phenomenon, but because I had contacts in that community who were sometimes sources of insight on CCP skulduggery, I noticed that ONLY the “antis” were engaging in the protective behaviors – the mainlanders and pro-CCP Hong Kongers/Taiwanese were not.
Interestingly, I was not getting any good information on the trend – unlike other scuttlebutt at the time.
Was it real or disinformation? Was it an op to flush out the antis? Was it “anti” paranoia?
I have no idea. But I personally think that China has been up to “bio-tricks” for a LONG time – as in back BEFORE SARS (2003).
If 2018 is the first time China released any biologicals, I would be VERY surprised.
SO – see what you think. Read this sucker, and then think about it.
I think TES is onto something.
A Note About January 6 – and More
I have been avoiding all things January 6, largely because I don’t want to give Nancy Gambino any “lift” as far as her phony “investigation” into HER OWN CRIME.
I understand her game plan, and I’m not going to play along.
I would have loved to have recounted that amazing day in another long, glowing, “all about me and my experiences” post, but no.
THIS IS WAR.
In my opinion, we can bring down these horrible communists faster by focusing on whatever WE want to focus on.
Nancy says “the fight is over here”.
NOPE. Go to hell, Mafia Bitch. We know what you did. With Kapo’s dirty FBI. And the backing of Mitch McConnell and SCOFFLAW SCOTUS.
Some may want to join the fight against Pelosi right now, and please feel free to “follow Darren Beattie into Pelosi’s breach”, but I think that MANDATES are going to kill these bastards at the polls, if we just help them commit electoral suicide.
Expose the “clot shot” risks more fully, and show that the mandates are MORE EVIL.
We need to make Democrats – destroying America for GREED under the cover of virtue signals – absolutely unelectable, and I think we can.
ENJOY THE SHOW.
Thank you all for being here. Have a great weekend.
Just got this in my notifications. I *KNEW* this was coming.
SPONSORED POSTS
WordPress.com has started testing Native Sponsored Posts. This is an extension of our advertising program and will have the same controls and restrictions as our standard ad placements.You may see these Sponsored Posts running on your sites as we expand testing. They may be promoting WordPress.com content, marketing initiatives, or brands.
Longer term, we hope to offer Sponsored Posts to our users as a way to help drive traffic and promote content discovery. For any questions or issues, see our Native Sponsored Posts FAQ.
Whatever they’re up to, it’s not for our good. Please keep your eyes on it.
The most likely sites to be affected are the old WQTH, The U Tree, or our new “backup” Q Tree.
However, even this site might be affected, if the fine print of JetPack usage involves this form of editorial takeover.
Like I said – keep your eyes out for it, and let me know if you see it.
The REEEEE you are about to hear are Apple employees being cut loose when WOKE goes BROKE.
TL;DR – Apple is definitely full steam ahead on “client side user photo analysis and reporting”, and has issued an evasive, sneakily worded denial of concerns about expansions of surveillance, as it rushes the new software into place.
Thanks to Cthulhu, we were warned EARLY about Apple’s surveillance plans. Sounds very innocent, right? I will explain exactly why this is not. This is INCIPIENT POLITICAL SPYING AND PRETEXT FOR ARREST. “But it’s for the CHILDREN!” You remember the last people on the left who used that line to “save children”? THEY’RE BACK. Apple …
It’s a very good thing I didn’t wait to start checking off “DONE” items on my “GTFO” action list, because Apple just confirmed my suspicions that they are NOT backing down, and moreover that there is trouble ahead.
Reading carefully as only a BURNED CHUMP can, it is very clear that Apple is saying WITHOUT SAYING IN PLAIN WORDS that they won’t concede to government surveillance demands that they themselves OPPOSE.
ANALOGY: “We’re just friends [but if he asks me to run off, I will do it in a heartbeat].”
Apple is not speaking from the heart here, and TRUST is GONE.
You know what I’m saying? There are any number of WORDFARE WAYS for Apple to renege on not allowing surveillance here, after they have designed, implemented, and put into place the KNOWING MECHANISM for such reneging on privacy.
I think everybody who is not satisfied with Apple’s message here is seeing the exact same thing that I am seeing.
Apple IS reserving the right to not just allow but implement government and contractor surveillance with which it agrees.
Do I HAVE to repeat the picture?
Let’s do it anyway.
Nah. I’m no longer a chump.
Tim Cook is part of the ELECTION CARTEL. These are the “Friends of Freedom”, “Friends of Privacy”, and “Friends of the Constitution” who were SILENT.
Martin Luther King Junior was SO RIGHT.
NOW – let me give you some more useful links.
Here is a kinda cute but kinda “jabbed-looking” tech chick with purple hair giving a nice description of what is going on.
Jump to 3:20 to catch the Apple story, or just start at the beginning to hear about more shocking Israeli spy tech.
Here is a rather pithy but “cutting right to the chase” report on the privacy concerns.
The title is a bit of a joke. Allow me to explain that, first.
The Mike Lindell symposium is amazing. The BOMBSHELLS just keep dropping. FAKE ELECTIONS are PROVEN. Dominion is TOAST. Audits are REAL and NEEDED.
All of this simply MUST be scaring the hell out of the DonkeyComs.
I strongly suspect that the communists and globalists – the Bidenistas and Bidenazis – are so desperate at the absolute uncovering of FAKE ELECTIONS, that they will need to find a NEW COVID-LEVEL REALITY HOAX – IN CONJUNCTION WITH CHINA – and there’s not much left except NUCLEAR.
Remember – another nuclear hoax like the sabotage at Three-Mile Island also serves their denuclearization agenda, to sell all the goods cheap to Russia and China, and truly CRUSH America.
They’ve already done a test nuclear hoax in Columbus, Ohio……
Ah, yes. It’s the TIMELINES that always get them. AS YOU WILL SEE. In my opinion, somebody like known provocateur ROBERT CREAMER has to be behind the Columbus “nuclear reactor escalation” hoax, and hopefully, when we have a new head of the Department of Energy fully operational – and some new leadership at the top …
I knew there was something fishy about that one. Yeah, it was a GREAT troll, but the Ohio GOP Christmas Party was too picayune of a target. The DonkeyComs don’t waste ammo like that. Something else was up.
And then I figured it out.
“BOOM”.
It was a TEST. And PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONING. (Mike Lindell is SO onto this stuff – it’s AWESOME.)
But remember – COVID is 90% hoax, but they used a REAL VIRUS for effect.
The next one will likely use real radioisotopes. Thankfully, people here have a bit of understanding, due to the excellent lessons from our resident physics teacher, SteveInCO.
We left off, circa 1903, having discovered radioactivity and the electron, and making quite a bit of progress with them.
To try to recap (and there are a few things in this so-called “recap” that I should have mentioned earlier, but didn’t), an electron is a negatively charged particle about 1/1830th the mass of a hydrogen atom, which up to then had been the lightest thing known to exist. They could be knocked off of atoms in a Crookes tube and they would then form what was called a cathode ray (yes, the same “cathode ray” in those big tubes in those old boxy TVs). It is possible to strip one electron off a hydrogen atom, at which point…..
SO – if the next thing they pull off is NUCLEAR, give whatever phony story the complicit media is selling, plenty of SIDE-EYE.
Are you with me?
The LYING MEDIA and the incorrigible DONKEY COMS will be LYING AGAIN.
Now – on to today’s BIG story.
“Dr. Shiva EXPOSES Big Tech and Censor Nazis”
This evening, the often left-ridiculed Dr. Shiva gave a STUNNING speech – absolutely amazing – something that will go down in history in any kind of a just future.
This clip is absolutely must-watch. This is true patriotism, spoken by a man we can all look up to.
You will note that he was invited to give a speech to a national medical association recently – just listen to him and you will understand why.
What Dr. Shiva does here is to recount very CLEARLY how he was CHEATED BY MACHINES out of an election, and then STONEWALLED in finding answers. It’s beautiful, because NOW we understand exactly what happened.
He noted that in the ONE county with hand-counted paper ballots he WON by 10 points. But in ALL the other counties with machine voting, he LOST 60-40, 60-40, 60-40, 60-40……
During his investigation, he was STONEWALLED by state election officials – especially after he learned that they were ILLEGALLY deleting ballot images after the election. He got into an argument with one official on Twitter, and was SUSPENDED from Twitter when he posted emails to prove the official was giving him the run-around.
From there, he went into court. During that experience, a HIT PIECE was done on Shiva, but the hit piece accidentally revealed that the Massachusetts Secretary of State had been the one who contacted Twitter to get Shiva silenced. Dr. Shiva then took that information into discovery, and it was revealed that the government of Massachusetts had a “Trusted Twitter Partnership” with Twitter.
From there, it just gets worse. Not only did the government have this partnership with Twitter – there is a special portal for government officials. And not just that – there is an organization – the National Association of State Election Directors – which the Massachusetts state election director had contacted, and THEY petitioned Twitter to have Dr. Shiva kicked off.
It’s worth listening to this point in the video (around 13:00-13:30), to hear how Tucker Carlson missed that story at that time, apparently, and the crowd breaks into “SHAME ON FOX”.
Anyway, Dr. Shiva was back on Twitter, doing all kinds of (sadly “controversial”) tweets, e.g. RE vaccination, with no consequence, but when he shared those emails again, he was permanently suspended in 17 minutes.
Back in court – this time against 7 lawyers, including 3 Twitter lawyers from Wilmer Hale…..
…… LOL – I think you’re starting to see how this works…. YES – THAT Wilmer-Hale……
The one Katica discovered was representing Hillary Clinton’s email case……
……but Shiva discovers that NOBODY contacted Twitter this time – he was algorithmically monitored and if he posted those emails again, he was going to get kicked off.
Yup. TWITTER had THAT particular evidence BLOCKED. How convenient!
But from there, Dr. Shiva discovered a GOLD MINE OF CENSORSHIP, trying to figure out more about the “Trusted Twitter Partnership”. He just lucked into this stuff by persistent searching.
Here is a link to ALL the materials I’m going to show you.
This next one is particularly interesting – this is where said usual suspects GLOAT over how WELL the “playbook” worked!
And there is a BEAUTIFUL diagram of how these suspects interrelate……
V
V
V
At this point, I’m just going to say, PLAY THE VIDEO and LISTEN TO DR. SHIVA.
The dude just gets on a roll that had me CHEERING!
Lindell joins him when he finishes, and it’s GREAT.
NOW – here is my point about the GEIGER COUNTER.
These two guys – this symposium – you listen to this, and you will know – they are REAL PATRIOTS trying to DO SOMETHING, and they are FLUSHING OUT THE BAD GUYS.
Consequently, they are like a DETECTOR for WHEAT versus CHAFF.
Mike Lindell and Dr. Shiva are amazingly powerful WHEAT-CHAFF SORTERS.
Perfect for use on PRIMARY CANDIDATES.
Who is going to be on their side? Who’s going to stick up for them? Who’s going to say their names with PRIDE?
PATRIOTS. REAL MAGA. People who will ADMIT that the machines are RIGGED.
Who is not going to be on their side? Who’s going to avoid mentioning them? Who’s going to be very uncomfortable talking about them – or FAKING IT?
RINOs. GOPe. LIGHTWEIGHTS. LOSERS. CHUMPS. People who use the machines to WIN.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, Dr. Shiva is always trying to SELL STUFF, because – well – he’s being CHEATED at every turn, so he has to make a buck somehow. And Mike sells PILLOWS THAT WORK, for cryin’ out loud.
There are worse sins in the world. LIKE STEALING ELECTIONS.
But what they did today was REMARKABLE.
These guys proved that the whole electoral system, the government, the media, and the social media are RIGGED.
THEY ARE HEROES.
So here is the deal.
We are no longer taking this shit.
And most of all, this.
The DonkeyComs and RINOs are NOT getting out of responsibility for
FAKE ELECTIONS.
AND THIS, TOO.
We are not going to be FOOLED and SUCKERED by the next BIOLOGICAL, CHEMICAL, or NUCLEAR ATTACK from these lying, hoaxing American DNC communists and their horrible CCP allies.
We’re done with their hoaxy but deadly bullshit.
We are taking America back LEGALLY, PEACEFULLY, and WHETHER THEY LIKE IT OR NOT.
At this point, I don’t really know the answer to this question. I’ve only been studying it for a few hours. However, given the sordid track record of the Faucisphere in government, the duplicitous alien planet Big Pharma, and that wonderful global organization of medical liars and policy-reversing Tedros types, the United Nations of China, I’m not feeling like giving these sneaky profiteers a clean bill of health just yet.
Let’s just say that I’m still collating.
As both American government and American / Western corporations increasingly act like their Chinese counterparts, I expect to see dog-killing treats with little “Made in the USA” graphics on them very soon, unless we bring the Great Fake Election and Virus Scam of 2020 to a very “judicious” close.
It was only tonight, that I had ever even HEARD of the idea of graphene or its derivatives in vaccines.
This HAD to be a conspiracy theory, I thought. NO. FUCKING. WAY.
Seriously. My immediate thought was “no way”. That would be like putting little molecular razor blades in the little biomolecular apples known as cells. Who the hell would do that shit?
And YES – when I went looking for information about the toxicity of graphene and friends, sure enough, there is a TON of information about it.
If you read that article, you will see that “molecular razor blade” is indeed just ONE of the ways that graphene and coconspirators damage cells, organs, organelles, and anything else that gets in their way.
It’s not like one might not expect that, given that graphene is a bit like asbestos and other inorganic particulates, only flatter and sharper, but you never know – maybe there are windows of low toxicity where things are OK, or at least BETTER. Indeed, such variable CURVES of toxicity are hinted at in the paper above, dependent on the size of the razor blades.
Science! It works! When you’re honest, of course, but if so….. it works!
But back to FAUCISM and why I don’t exactly trust the current “situation”.
After I was sure this stuff actually HAD toxicity issues that one might reasonably expect, I went looking to verify that this business about putting it in vaccines was just a nutty conspiracy theory.
And sure enough, a helpful “ABMG” type (associate of Bill and Melinda Gates- reference HERE) from New York and Forbes magazine assures us that NO – all the conspiracy theories about “graphene oxide” in the Pfizer COVID vaccine are exactly that – DUMB conspiracy theories.
The problem, if you go read this, is that the denial falls a bit flat. As in VERY flat. It reminds me of a variety of failed debunkings. It’s very much like a “Snopes evasion”, if you are familiar with those.
It’s nothing like the following:
“Pfizer kindly gave us three sample vials of their vaccine, which we were allowed to select at random from actual pharmacies and hospitals, with a letter of authorization from the head of Pfizer vaccines. We took these to an independent laboratory skilled in the determination of biopharmaceuticals and nanomaterials, including graphene and its derivatives. Not only were there no components that are not listed on the Pfizer and CDC websites – there was no detectable graphene of any kind, when subjected to known methods of isolating graphenes.”
See? An answer like THAT is “game over”, as Scott here likes to say.
Instead, the answer I got was basically a recounting of the true but mostly irrelevant fact that Jane Ruby is highly unqualified to talk in a deep and expert way about a lot of the things she talks about ANYWAY.
To which I say…..
“Yes, this is true. Back to the question. Please. They aren’t putting this stuff in the vaccines – ARE THEY?”
So I keep reading…… to which I then say…..
“Yes, it sounds like this is a conspiracy theory, and the people who say that the vaccine is 99% graphene oxide – obviously ludicrous – are almost certainly spouting bullshit. But I don’t care about that. ARE THEY putting this stuff in vaccines?”
So I keep reading, and the proof boils down to trusting that the ingredient list that Pfizer originally gave to CDC and FDA doesn’t include graphene oxide, and that Pfizer would never lie to CDC or FDA, because they would get in trouble.
Seriously. Go to the link and read it.
Of course, just because CDC lies like crazy, and FDA is horribly political, and BOTH are beneficiaries of these vaccines, wouldn’t affect what they might say.
Nor the fact that this IS an experimental vaccine where they don’t actually include the list of ingredients in the package for some weird reason, like maybe they would be lying if they did.
I mean, the Fauci People are mostly honest, mostly.
Well, I didn’t get a good answer from the debunking. So I looked elsewhere. THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE.
Why, there’s almost no need to stop by Forbes and have a science journalist just miss the fact that scientists find this stuff useful in vaccines, despite – or maybe even BECAUSE OF – its toxicity.
Thank you, Science Journalism! You’re almost as great as the other kinds!
A vaccine that keeps pumping out vaccine for 30 days after you inject it? Holy shit!
A vaccine that stabilizes messenger RNA at body temperature? Holy shit!
A vaccine that can migrate (“translational efficiency”) to the lymph nodes? Holy shit!
Now don’t get me wrong – this is great stuff. This is cancer-curing stuff – using mRNA and hydrogels and adjuvants and graphene oxide – gotta love it. You get CANCER – you might like this stuff.
Of course, if you get that cancer from a graphene oxide-containing vaccine for coronavirus, that might be a different story, but who is gonna profit on both ends of THAT equation? Don’t be silly! Insurance will mostly pay for it, mostly.
Yeah, you know what I’m sayin’.
And what’s REALLY interesting here is how LONG this vaccine lasts, when you use this graphene oxide stuff. I mean, it lasts a LONG TIME. And migrates, too! Even better than the old lipid nanoparticle technology!
Which just kinda seems a lot like the way the Pfizer vaccine lasts a long time in people’s bodies, and now even LONGER on the shelf, maybe TOO long in the body, which is good for gene therapy or cancer treatment, but bad for a disease vaccine, but let’s just ignore that alleged motivation for using a less safe new tech for a vaccine.
What I find interesting is how this graphene oxide stuff seems to STABILIZE the mRNA. Wow! Would that help an mRNA vaccine survive higher temperatures in normal refrigerators, like Pfizer does now?
Silly me just wondering aloud. It’s called a “hypothesis”.
And would Fauci and CDC actually TELL us if they changed the formulation just a little bit?
You see where I’m at?
And it gets worse, because graphenes cause symptoms a lot like COVID in the lungs, but – no – I don’t even want to go there. THAT is really kinda conspiracy theory. Let’s just stick to the simple question.
Is. Anybody. Using. Graphene, graphene oxide, or whatever. In COVID vaccines?
You know what? I don’t know. And I don’t trust government, industry or media to tell us the truth.
Because they all now ACT just like we’re in China. I mean, state media supports state industry.
One of the really big shockers for me has been the relationship of the tech giants to the bat coronavirus researchers. What the heck is up with that?
Why did Zuckerberg and Chan (after COVID “struck”) fund Baric, who worked with “the bat woman” and Wuhan? It smells every bit like a “book deal” – an influence pay-off after the fact. This would lead me to believe that Zuck and Chan and Baric actually go back FURTHER, in ways that have not appeared yet.
Why did Google fund Daszak and a group that then funded Wuhan? This actually goes back. And then, Daszak trying to cover up HIS role in the cover-up of the Wuhan Institute of Virology connection – what’s up with THAT?
I don’t want to get into all that stuff too much, but I want to leave you some great links to show you this is REAL – this is not BS. The “fake news snopesing complex” is all over this, trying to hide it, but the word is OUT.
TECH and BAT RESEARCH are THICK.
References on tech / bat research monetary links
Here is the Zuckerberg-Chan “book deal payoff” to Baric’s lab.
Fauci reveals that Mark Zuckerberg offered him “resources and money” – this at the same time Zuck was using cash to interfere in the 2020 election on behalf of Democrats.
Now, I had just heard about all of these monetary connections now being discovered, and thought that any relationship between the tech giants and these virus creeps had to be connected to the FAKE ELECTION PLOT.
BUT – as I was perusing the internet COVID literature, I encountered two scientific papers that made me realize something.
These tech tyrants may have had ANOTHER motive. A DEEPER and MORE PERSONAL motive.
Wanting to live forever – or at least LONGER.
And it gets BIGGER – as in all of society – as in FITNESS – as in EUGENICS.
Here is the part of this paper that set off the alarms. I will make BOLD or underline the most important parts:
BAT MICROBES CAN SHED LIGHT ON DISEASE, IMMUNITY, AND LONGEVITY
Bats and their microbes are increasingly recognized as important components of zoonotic disease cycles (37, 38). A few studies have identified potentially pathogenic members of the excreted bat microbiome such as Bartonella spp. (39, 40) and Leptospira spp. (41). Bats are also known or suspected to be the reservoir of several viruses that are lethal to humans, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Ebola, and rabies viruses (42,–44), as well as of Plasmodium parasites closely related to those in rodents that are used as models to study malaria (45). Genomic insights have generated plausible explanations for how bats may have evolved to harbor such deadly microbes (e.g., reference 46), but in spite of abundant evidence that the microbiome interfaces directly with the host immune system (47, 48), there has not yet been an integrative study addressing whether microbial symbionts contribute to bats’ innate ability to act as pathogen reservoirs. As an additional axis of variation, bats which have flexible roosting habits can be found in close proximity to humans and may potentially swap microbes with humans and their companion animals (49). Bats may transfer microbes to livestock when they exist in close proximity (e.g., pigs consuming partially eaten fruits dropped by fruit bats [50]) or use the same habitats (e.g., horses coming into contact with bat droppings in pastures [51]). Studying bat microbiomes would therefore have obvious public health implications and could help to explain the epidemiology of emerging infectious diseases.
Similar avenues of research can also consider what impact, if any, the host microbiome has on susceptibility of bats to white nose syndrome (WNS), a frequently fatal cutaneous infection that has reduced hibernating bat populations by up to 90% in North America (52). Because not all individuals are killed by the infection, there may be selection on the skin microbiomes of surviving individuals to become enriched with antifungal bacteria. Indeed, one study discovered that in WNS-positive populations, the skin microbiome of bats was enriched with Rhodococcus and Pseudomonas spp., which are known to have antifungal activity (53). Additional studies in this area can answer the questions of how exactly these bacteria inhibit the growth of the causative agent of WNS and what enrichment of the microbiome with these bacteria might mean for the long-term survival of affected host populations.
Bat microbiomes can be used more generally to understand the links between the microbiome and the evolution of other phenomena of interest, such as immunity and longevity. To date, studies addressing the link between host aging and the microbiome in humans and lab animals have uncovered direct links between microbial metabolic products and life span of the host (54). Bats represent an exciting system in which to test for links between the microbiome and aging because they are exceptionally long-lived for a mammal of their size (55, 56). Mice are conventional model mammals, but the commonly used BALB/c mouse strain has a life span of about a year and half, making studies of longevity in these animals rather short-lived (57). Bats of comparable mass can achieve life spans of up to 40 years, and many are philopatric to particular roosts, making repeat sampling of individuals throughout their lifetimes possible (58, 59). Because these animals’ microbiomes can be sampled nonlethally, they are inherently attractive for such studies (36). However, it is worth noting that these animals are especially sensitive to disturbance during hibernation, so experimental designs should minimize unintended disturbance of roosts, particularly in areas where white nose syndrome has decimated bat populations (60). It may also be possible to keep bats in captive colonies in order to sample them throughout successive years of their lives. Recent evidence suggests that metabolites produced by gut microbes in bats might offset the oxidative damages incurred during active flight, resulting in downstream impacts on aging (61). However, many questions still remain. By what mechanism does the microbiome help to extend life span, and is this pattern consistent across mammals? How does interindividual variation impact the relationships between longevity and microbiome community structure? We believe that studies of bat microbiomes can help to answer these important questions and more.Go to:
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Bats represent an untapped resource for understanding microbiome evolution in mammals. Because of their exceptional diversity, longevity, and ecological importance, we believe that studies of their microbial symbionts will reveal exciting new roles for microbes in driving host evolution and fitness and may help us to better understand the dynamics of emerging zoonotic pathogens. We provide applications of bat microbiome research in the hopes that more researchers will realize the potential that this system has to offer. Multi-omics approaches can be used to parse apart the contributions of host genome, metagenome, and microbial metabolites to the processes described above, and as the costs of these methods continue to decrease, such studies will only become more feasible. The results of studying bat microbiomes using these approaches will undeniably advance the fields of host-microbe interactions, comparative physiology, and public health.
This then led me to a paper specifically about bats and longevity.
This paper is an absolute GOLD MINE of authoritative scientific optimism about life extension through bats, tying in IMMUNITY and INFLAMMATION. I cannot just pick out some part to highlight – the WHOLE THING is evidence of what people are thinking.
What I have done is grabbed the IMAGES which are the most quickly informing. Not all of them – just some of them. Plus a few selections of text which are equally useful.
Abstract
For centuries, people believed that bats possessed sinister powers. Bats are thought to be ancestral hosts to many deadly viruses affecting humans including Ebola, rabies, and most recently SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. However, bats themselves tolerate these viruses without ill effects. The second power that bats have is their longevity. Bats live much longer than similar-sized land mammals. Here we review how bats’ ability to control inflammation may be contributing to their longevity. The underlying mechanisms may hold clues to developing new treatments for age-related diseases. Now may be the time to use science to exploit the secret powers of bats for human benefit.
Figure 1 Bats Live Longer Than Similar-Sized Land Mammals
(A) Major lineages of bats.
(B) Relationship between lifespan and body mass in mammals. Bats are indicated by red circles; all other species of mammals are indicated by black circles. The lifespan and body mass data are from Healy et al. (2014).
Treatments Based on Bat Strategies
Bats have evolved multiple mechanisms to suppress inflammation, in particular by dampening nucleic acid sensing pathways. A number of pharmacological interventions targeting nucleic acid sensing pathways had already been developed. Historically, the focus has been on developing activators of these pathways to serve as antiviral or anticancer drugs (reviewed in Vanpouille-Box et al., 2019). However, with the realization that inflammation contributes to a wide range of diseases from autoimmunity to age-related conditions, the interest has shifted to developing antagonists of nucleic acid sensors (Sheridan, 2019). This proved to be a challenging task due to high level of redundancy within nucleic acid sensing pathways and the danger of increasing vulnerability to infections. Here, the information obtained from the studies of bats can assist in drug discovery (Table 1 ).
Future Perspectives
In summary, besides serving as a source of deadly diseases and harboring viruses similar to SARS-CoV-2, which caused the current pandemics, bats have a lot to offer humanity by illuminating the pathways to develop novel therapeutics to treat age-related conditions and promote longevity. Already studies of the altered innate immune responses in bats point to several classes of small molecules, some of which have links to aging. However, we can only see the tip of the iceberg when it comes to understanding how bats deal with inflammation, and clearly more studies are warranted. This is also true for other hallmarks of aging, which are still minimally explored. In addition to finding small molecules targeting specific pathways that can be tested in humans, it will be of interest to engineer specific bat alterations in mice and determine whether this leads to enhanced lifespan and healthspan.
Bats have evolved skewed, and ultimately successful, strategies to experience longer and healthier lives, even if this is a secondary outcome of selection for responses to viral infections and/or the dramatic range of metabolic states that accompany periods of flight and torpor. Humans in the last century have created a lifestyle that has gone bats; we live in high densities and (many of us) travel extensively, enhancing exposure to and spread of pathogens. By embracing “batty” strategies to deal with the challenges that our new lifestyle presents, we may be able to solve what look to be the two biggest medical challenges of the 21st century: the rise of viral pandemics and the ever-increasing prevalence of chronic diseases that all share aging as their biggest risk factor.Go to:
Acknowledgments
This perspective was conceived when the authors were quarantined together for potential exposure to COVID-19. Research in authors’ laboratories is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, United States.
Where does this go?
OK? It really helps to skim through that SECOND article, because one can ALMOST see the stuff that would make these TECH TITANS DROOL.
Centuries more of life if we just got PARTIAL success in bringing over some “bat tech” to human life.
And I didn’t really dig here, either. This was just what was floating on TOP of the “bat longevity” literature.
Think how much “good” Zuckerberg, Brin, Gates and these others could do, in a few more centuries, if they just had the elixir vitae that bats seem to promise!
Those who don’t think this is a possible motivation, can look at my previous discussion of “life extension” in another article about the more “fictional” science of adrenochrome, wherein I discussed WHY it’s possible to sell a complete fiction like adrenochrome the drug to both CUSTOMERS and CRITICS. In that discussion, the interest of the tech titans in life extension is both mentioned and referenced.
The Truths, Lies, and Disinformation Surrounding a Mythical yet Very Real Substance There is nothing more intriguing than an enigmatic character who defies political and cultural boundaries to tell great truths, yet mixes in just enough lies, fakery, shiny objects, red herrings, exaggerations and omissions to make himself or herself economically viable solely on their …
In the process of this scientific and social examination of the mythical “adrenochrome”, I looked at the very real concept of “young blood”.
There is a REAL market for any REAL or merely RUMORED rejuvenation.
People will even inject themselves with a deadly POISON to look younger.
Yes. “Beautox” is real. And it “REALLY” works – to make people LOOK younger.
Oh, Mark Zuckerberg – you are looking MAAAAHRRRRVELOUS!
Now, I don’t know WHO or HOW – China or CIA or Obama or DARPA – but I suspect that LIFE EXTENSION is the HOBBY WITH BENEFITS of the elite. And BATS was a natural attractor.
So I suspect that this INFLUENCER – bat research as the path to the elixir vitae – was introduced into the RIGHT CIRCLES by people who understood influence. And HERE WE ARE.
W
PS:
How will China and their puppets study the success of their bioweapon here in the United States, and its effect on voting?
This is for the historical record. I hope that this analysis gets to the “dissident scientists” involved, but even if it never does, future historians will get a powerful look at what I call “Fake Science” – the establishment’s phony, deceptive and controlled scientific complex – and how infiltration, control, and discreditation of dissident populist scientists was used in this era to keep them in check, protecting controlled science and the interests that keep it controlled – for money, power, and “say” in human destiny.
Even though this story has little or nothing to do with magnetism, I believe this was the beginning of strong discreditation of Judy Mikovits, Sherri Tenpenny, and other “COVID dissident doctors and scientists” who are pursuing the “spike protein and COVID vaccine gynecological problems”. Ultimately, the “coup de grace” was delivered via the phony vaccine magnetism psy-op.
The BIG HIT on this group was the discreditation of Dr. Tenpenny on “vaccine magnetism” – a CIA-constructed sandtrap which I could see coming a mile away, with great horror, as it was placed in front of these “insufficiently skeptical skeptics” – who are skeptical enough to doubt the controlling LIES marbled into mainstream science – but who are blithely unaware of just how evil the establishment really is, in making sure nobody listens to them.
That poor, poor woman. Sounds pretty crazy, doesn’t it? Well, here is the deal. The “establishment science skeptic community” is social, and because it’s a bit lonely in Skepticville, people become tolerant of the crazier stuff, very unlikely to be true, which can easily be fed into the community. Obviously an intelligence agency which knows psychology better than all our universities combined can have a field day with that stuff.
However, before THAT story – which we will get into later – there is THIS story – where I saw these doctors being set up for discreditation on a different topic.
Every time they used the word “suramin” I winced, and this is why.
I will follow this story in roughly chronological order, from my first awareness to today, when I saw the complete picture. However, I may “fast forward” to later knowledge, at times, to put things in context.
When I first saw THIS headline from the SGT Report posted in this site’s open thread (I think it was Duchess, so THANK YOU!), all I could think was “OMG, what a pile of unbelievability THIS is.”
Not only did I think that “vaccine shedding” was preposterous – the idea that it could be fended off somehow with pine needle tea just sounded NUTS.
That was May 10, 2021 – ironically exactly one month ago. I had NO CLUE that one month later – today – I would be convinced that not only is “vaccine shedding” real – Pfizer knew it was a “thing” all along – and long ago.
This is the Pfizer data obtained from the Japanese government.
This is the data up close.
The most important data is simple – the fact that the vaccine is relocating all over the bodies of the test animals – SHOCKINGLY to the ovaries as one of the primary destinations – and the amount of TIME it’s taking to do so. The reason is that the vaccine is encapsulated in lipids – fatty substances – which protect the mRNA, and give it time to get into cells.
Looking at this data, there is no reason to doubt that the vaccine could express in skin lipids, and given that it WAS INDEED expressed in breast milk (full of lipids), killing at least one baby, the EXCRETION of the vaccine at this point makes logical sense.
Thus, when this information got out, the CRITICS were in the catbird seat, and the INDUSTRY which oddly tolerated these results, was in trouble.
How does one flip that around? DISCREDIT THE CRITICS.
Now I did not realize at the time that THAT was what was going on with “pine needle tea”. I thought this was just the usual stuff that pops up routinely in the “natural health” world. However, a closer look at the article surprised me.
There appeared to be a chemical error, and it appeared to be Dr. Judy Mikovits making that error. But it’s not her making the error.
Here are two paragraphs of interest:
There is a potential antidote to the current spike protein contagion which is called Suramin. It’s found in many forests around the world, in Pine needles. Suramin has inhibitory effects against components of the coagulation cascade and against the inappropriate replication and modification of RNA and DNA. Excessive coagulation causes blood clots, mini-clots, strokes, and unusually heavy menstrual cycles.
Dr. Judy Mikovits asserts that globalists are well aware that pine needle tea is the answer to covid depopulation weapons, and they are secretly using pine needle tea to protect themselves from the very plague they have unleashed upon the world, Mikovitz explains.
I do disagree with a portion of Mikovits’ beliefs, but not everything. She really changed my whole view of “gain of function” – she sees very deeply into the problems of “Faucism”, shall we say. One thing she is NOT is stupid. So when I read that second paragraph, I simply didn’t believe it. It’s complete crap. “Pine Needle Tea vs. The Globalists”. Yeah, great movie! And kind of ironic that one would use a NATURAL ABORTIFACIENT to face off with “depopulationists”, but we’ll save that bit of “oy vey” for later analysis.
Well, deeper digging showed me where this came from. ANOTHER person who I usually trust, up to a point – Mike Adams of Natural News. From the day BEFORE – May 9.
Mike Adams is actually a pretty decent scientist, although he does allow guests on his show to wander off into clickbait generalities, far-fetched speculations, and utopian (or dystopian) characterizations. It’s just edgy stuff. Typical “natural remedies” world. I still buy the rational and reasoned parts of it – it’s just “old science”. And on the basic FACTS coming out of labs, Mike Adams doesn’t present “fake data”. He waits like a buzzard for REAL DATA that looks good for “naturalism” and then plays “AHA! LOOK AT THIS!” with mainstream medicine. It’s a “schtick”, but it’s a pretty good one.
Anyway, the wording is identical – SGT Report was just copying and mirroring Natural News, as they often do.
I saw at the time that Mike Adams had just picked this information up from some naturals blogger, and had copied it verbatim.
Now – beyond the nonsensical attribution to Mikovits, there are actually TWO big chemistry problems with this article that Mike is citing.
One is on the idea that shikimic acid – the desired ingredient in pine needles – IS Tamiflu.
Quoted in the story:
Researchers at the University of Maine at Orono say they’ve found a new and relatively easy way to extract shikimic acid — a key ingredient in the drug Tamiflu — from pine tree needles.
That’s not exactly true. Shikimic acid is NOT Tamiflu, nor is it an ingredient in Tamiflu. Now, a more accurate statement is also given:
Shikimic acid derivatives have also been shown to exhibit useful biological activity. Most notably, the well-known antiviral drug oseltamivir (Tamiflu), which acts as a viral neuraminidase inhibitor, is used to treat seasonal influenza and has been deployed during H1N1 influenza outbreaks.
YES. A derivative. Tamiflu is RELATED to shikimic acid, but it is a distinctly different molecule. Shikimic acid can be used to MAKE Tamiflu. But it is a building block – not the same thing.
All that said, shikimic acid, whether from star anise or from pine needles, is indeed antiviral in some contexts, and antiinflammatory in others. So, YES, pine needles are an actual curative thing. More than just containing an exotic natural acid, they were the equivalent of citrus fruit for North American Indians.
Indeed, pine needle tea can be used to treat scurvy, and it’s BETTER than just vitamin C (which it contains in vast amounts), because it also contains flavonoids which are curative for vascular symptoms of scurvy.
However, you have to pick the right pine needles – some are poisonous, and even the good ones can INDUCE ABORTION.
The part about inducing abortion is VERY critical. That would be very problematic for these doctor critics of the spike protein vaccines, if they were in fact advocating “a different abortifacient instead”.
See how that works?
That is – how do we say this? – ah, yes – discreditation.
Now, at the TIME, I just thought to myself “Wow – how unfortunate that these people who are going after the ‘abortion vaccine’ are advising people to take an abortifacient.”
And I’m not the only person who observed this. It turns out that the original blog article was edited a number of times, to ADD warning information about the potential abortifacient risks of pine needle teas. The information was not there originally. It looks to me like blog commenters (comments are invited but hidden) likely cautioned the author about the problem.
Yeah, let’s just give THAT the “jaundiced editorial eye” that Maria does so well.
ANYWAY, on to the OTHER chemical mistake – SURAMIN.
This is actually rather cute, and the wicked industry that just savaged Dr. Tenpenny is going to get a little karma here.
As you will see, shortly, part of the “discred” here is also for suramin itself – because it’s a potential and very legitimate “HCQ” or “ivermectin” – a readily available treatment. I didn’t realize this at the time.
I will explain that more fully in a moment.
Suramin is a synthetic drug – it’s not a natural product. Many of us can tell just by looking at the structure.
And NO, this stuff is NOT in pine needles. Anybody who says this is INSTABLOCKED in SCIENCEVILLE.
Suramin is a killer of parasites – it’s used to cure sleeping sickness and river blindness in Africa. It’s actually a well-known, long-term, old drug. Indeed, it’s a lot like hydroxychloroquine, being on that WHO list of essential medicines.
Aubergine, our local naturals expert, quickly spotted that this was a synthetic drug and very unlikely to be in pine needles. I confirmed her suspicions, but I didn’t really dig into WHY this error had been made in the article – until today, when I saw it from a discreditation angle.
First of all – to my surprise – there is some real science behind suramin as a treatment for COVID-19.
The following is from a very solid source that monitors new medical developments in the scientific literature.
Here we report the discovery of suramin, a 100-year-old drug, as a potent inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) through blocking the binding of RNA to the enzyme. In biochemical assays, suramin and its derivatives are at least 20-fold more potent than remdesivir, the currently approved nucleotide drug for COVID-19. The 2.6 Å cryo-EM structure of the viral RdRp bound to suramin reveals two binding sites of suramin, with one site directly blocking the binding of the RNA template strand and the other site clash with the RNA primer strand near the RdRp catalytic active site, therefore inhibiting the viral RNA replication. Furthermore, suramin potently inhibits SARS-CoV-2 duplication in Vero E6 cells.
Better than Remdesivir? AWWWWW. Where did we hear THAT before?
OH, I REMEMBER! It was some drug called “hydroxychloroquine”!
So what you are seeing here, is that ANOTHER old antiparasitic drug looked to be BETTER THAN REMDESIVIR as an antiviral. Why, that would almost be THREE FOR THREE. Were it not nipped in the bud.
So indeed, Dr. Judy Mikovits had spotted that suramin was a useful drug for COVID. She had prior knowledge that it has been trialed as a treatment for AUTISM, and that, also, with some surprising success.
Now – here is where it gets really interesting.
THIS video was cited in the “pine needle tea” blog post. It is HIGHLY edited. Just listen. The MUSIC is absolutely CRINGEVILLE.
https://youtu.be/JYHrmmmoX30
NOTE ADDED LATER (June 14, 2022)
You will note that the video is now just a link.
Here is an EARLIER screenshot from right after the video went down – which was basically a day after I published.
Note that it was NOT removed by YouTube – it was removed by the uploader at that time.
Here is a screenshot from the video when it was up.
This Academy of Divine Knowledge (June 14, 2022 discussion HERE) seems tied to many of the luminaries of the “discredited dirty dozen” – but IMO it may very well be part of the discreditation of them.
It’s too bad the video is down – you cannot see the skillful editing. Basically, an earlier video of Mikovits which was “good science” was recast by editing to create a point of division on falsehood, rather that a unification on truth.
As I was saying (before this note was added)……
This is a beautiful editing job which accomplishes two things:
(1) makes Mikovits look authoritative to people in the new age end of the natural remedies world ($$$$$)
(2) makes Mikovits look utterly discredited in the scientific world (?????)
One would not know, from this video, ANYTHING about the idea that suramin is turning out to be ANOTHER potential HCQ, safer and better than remdesivir.
But yet this video is “helping” her, and I seriously doubt she realizes just how undermining it is.
This is how discred works. Very often, the subject has NO IDEA. They may see the discrediting actions as not just neutral, but well-intended. But outside the understanding of the target, discred keeps things DIVIDED. Serious people are not going to take Mikovits seriously. Suramin will look like one more fish tank cleaner. Remdesivir (very likely on the cutting room floor for that video) won’t be threatened.
It’s so SLICK.
But THAT is not the best part. When suramin is FALSELY linked to pine needle tea, and the CHUMPS – the MARKS – are tricked into saying it – everything falls apart.
Mikovits’ advocacy of suramin as another potential HCQ / ivermectin looks loony
The Chinese chump scientists’ very legitimate work on suramin, but threatening remdesivir, gets memory-holed
Any doctors who pick up and repeat the error about suramin and pine needle tea are tainted by the error
The chump docs are now ready for the coup de grace – the phony magnetic vaccine psy-op
I hope you now see WHY these small errors matter – and why “opposition research” is a THING not only in politics, but in the highly politicized science, under which we now suffer.
I think these good doctors were SET UP.
I think that THIS:
…..was the DESIRED OUTCOME OF THIS:
“Dissident” doctors and scientists need to be more careful. We are up against very EVIL people.
Wherein we look at how the COVID scammers are now using “magnetic” disinformation to try to escape justice for REAL abuse of liposome biotechnology to achieve [most likely contraceptive] vaccine persistence and migration.
TL;DR – after mRNA vaccine persistence and anatomical migration were revealed in leaked Pfizer data, explaining “shedding” via persistent liposomes, the COVID scammers began using “magnetic disinformation” to hide the intentional chemical and physical DESIGN of the lipids and liposomes to achieve persistence and migration, necessary for contraception and/or sterilization.
Things are moving very fast now. I wanted to sleep in today. I guess that’s not happening.
OK – let me quickly update everybody on where “things magnetic” are going. They are moving VERY quickly.
You need to understand HOW and WHY.
You will recall the very dubious “magnet challenge” where people were “sticking magnets” to the sites of their COVID vaccinations. To be very blunt, I have become so skeptical of our government, Tony Fauci, Bill Gates, and all these other creeps, that I was half-inclined to believe it – even though it SEEMED like nonsense.
And – as an act of partial disclosure – I’m not just some guy with refrigerator magnets. Some stuff from a field that I worked on (no pun intended) is actually now grabbing headlines. Yeah, I was a part of “fake science” – and I can assure you that some of it is very real. But – as I discovered very painfully – there are a LOT of lies in “fake science”, too.
SO – I decided to actually “give it a fair chance”, and investigate it myself. The results of my investigation turned out to be very enlightening, but not in any way that I expected. I am going to take you through it now.
But first, this.
The Motive To Cover Up Scientific Misconduct
It is important to understand that the CREEPS behind this whole COVID COUP are trying to evade responsibility for what is likely the most egregious scientific misconduct I’ve witnessed in my lifetime.
Possibly the greatest that has ever happened on this planet.
Basically, one of the first papers to spot the likely genetic engineering of the COVID bug was forced into retraction, thanks to Tony Fauci. This is, as many people are calling it with some irony, “political science” – or more seriously “politicized science”.
This is the same Tony Fauci who is in that picture above, with all those media puppets and David Rockefeller, right around 9/11, and 20 years before the medical bureaucracy and the media would try to pull off the COVID coup. That picture is quite real, by the way.
I actually did a lot of digging on this to find that open source, too. It’s a very legit photo.
Thanks to Deplorable Patriot for this tip on Rockefeller, which brings things full circle.
In my opinion you MUST see this, to get the big picture.
If you’re starting to see why Bill Gates and Melinda Gates (remember – there is a Gates in that picture, too – Bill’s dad) are doing a “move the money” dance with a media-assisted divorce, where the MSM is obviously “helping” with an infidelity narrative, you understand that there is some serious downfall going on.
Bill Gates is NECK DEEP IN SPIKE PROTEIN.
And SPIKE PROTEIN is not somewhere you want to be. If you need to catch up on where I am at, on the spike protein (and you WILL need this background, some of which I will cite later in this post, but not all), then take a detour to my last post on coronavirus vaccines and the spike protein.
TL;DR – you MUST listen to a short podcast of a scientist revealing the latest research on the spike protein vaccines. The VACCINE ITSELF (not just the spike protein – the mRNA vaccine itself) is persistent and is not only concentrating in ovaries – THE VACCINE ITSELF IS EXCRETED – e.g., in breast milk. Meaning …
And THIS is where it gets worse. The downfall is MORE THAN DESERVED.
This whole COVID scam is Lex Luthor stuff. It’s like something out of a movie. And THAT is why they are using top-shelf, almost magical, movie-level disinformation to hide what is going on.
This is why they are controlling the disclosure narrative with that Twitter-groomed group “DRASTIC”.
When you have to use “Chinese cover-up” as a cover-up, you’re covering up something BIG.
People actually DIED by the thousands and even the low millions because of GREED.
Remember “Lancetgate”, that DISCREDITED PAPER against use of hydroxychloroquine, which appeared in The Lancet? That bad paper, not by real scientists, but by some kind of data-mining cut-outs. That terrible paper, which was used by WHO and the UN to get several countries to BAN treatment of COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine – only to see (1) the paper retracted after popular investigation showed the paper was actually terrible – bad scientific analysis, and (2) DEATHS spiking in countries which banned HCQ in response to Lancetgate, and then dropping after HCQ was re-allowed.
I refer to this as “the Lancetgate effect”.
There is a lot more than this, too. Cuomo, the nursing home killer. China and WHO preaching AGAINST steroids, when those were what SAVED people with really bad cases of COVID-19.
This whole COVID coup was really a kind of “we must not fail” operation. And it is FAILING BIG.
OK – so now you understand the MOTIVE for covering up.
Let’s get to part of the MEANS – disinformation.
Giving Magnetic Vaccines a Chance To Be Real
I did an earlier post which summarized MOST but not ALL of my investigation of the “magnet challenge”.
Wherein we examine, in something like “MythBusters” style, the dubious “Magnet Challenge”, without relying (too much) on the anti-scientific crutch of scientific authority First, a confession. The main reason I am attracted to these videos of people sticking magnets to the COVID vaccination injection sites on their shoulders, is that I love to watch normal …
The basic result of my open-minded look at magnetism in vaccines, comes down to the following points:
the “magnet challenge” is not an adequate test due to surface adhesion phenomena
people are not being very scientific in their testing – or at least not scientific enough
there is no way people are getting fat RFID chips – which could interact with a magnet
however, that is not to say there is nothing magnetic – we need more and better data
we need more sensitive tests to investigate any alleged magnetic effect of vaccines
there is real, published, intense scientific interest in biomagnetic nanotechnology
magnetic recording nanomedia COULD be used to uniquely ID vaccine recipients
and yet, the whole thing – both the real and the false – feels like disinformation
Now – here is where it started getting good. This is in the COMMENTS of the “Part I” post.
Deplorable Patriot alerted me to allegations that magnets were sticking not just to COVID vaccine injection sites, but where people had been COVID-swabbed for TESTING.
Well, I had not been vaccinated for COVID-19, having already had the disease, and knowing basic science that I didn’t need a vaccine. Thus, I was unable to do the “magnet challenge” myself. However, I HAD been very recently COVID-swabbed, in the front, near my nose.
Yeah, it does, which freaked me out a bit until I examined things very closely.
Experimental
I took my neodymium kitchen magnets and tested to see if they “stuck” to the bridge of my nose. I had not tested there before.
Results
Shockingly, I found that the magnets stick surprisingly well to two spots on either side of the bridge of my nose, high up near my eyes, and directly over the area which was COVID-swabbed. I could even make the stick defy gravity, like the key demonstration, which was very convincing.
Had I stopped testing right there, I would have been convinced that the magnets stuck to those spots above the COVID swab site for magnetic reasons.
The behavior mimicked very strongly an actual attraction, BUT if I carefully observed the approach of the magnet, when using a leveraged HOLDER which would allow an acceleration to show itself, I was completely unable to observe an ACTUAL acceleration of the magnet. It NEVER accelerated to the skin.
As a check, I began testing many other sites on my face, including my FOREHEAD, where I got some excellent sticking. With enough testing, it became obvious that sticking is proportional to several factors:
local flatness
local hardness when flat
local softness when curved
skin moisture
skin oiliness
All of this adds up to SURFACE STICK. I then began testing for surface stickiness with a single fingertip, which mimics one flat side of a magnet. I would “stick it” and then then pull it away. Sure enough, the places where I get the magnet to stick the best, are places where I can get AUDIBLE “peel” when I pull my finger away from the “stick”.
I also observed, very carefully, how the magnet detached. In all cases, it appeared to be a “flat peel to a drop”.
Conclusions
It’s a surface stick. The reason I don’t get this on my shoulders is DRY SKIN.
Vaccination sites are likely BETTER FULFILLING the criteria I found for magnet surface sticks.
showing central moisture and oiliness due to penetration
showing local flatness due to nurse selection of centrality, depth, and non-edge character
This is all making sense to me now. At this point I think it is very unlikely that we’re going to find something that would show an acceleration of a magnet.
I hope you get that. I basically learned WHY people are being fooled by surface adhesion. I experienced it myself. It’s extremely convincing.
SO – at this point, the “magnet challenge” really struck me as a VERY professional psychological operation – even better than “flat Earth trolls”, although not as good as “masks”.
I repeat. “Magnets sticking” is a psy-op.
It is very clear that magnets stick to you in the right spots. It’s very EASY to convince yourself that they are sticking BECAUSE they are magnets. It’s very HARD to “re-convince” yourself that they are REALLY sticking because of surface phenomena.
I wanted to then do another post – a “Part II” – about actual, real, magnetic biotechnology. However, there is clearly no rush on this. So I set the whole project aside – until now.
Hiding Real (and Guilty) Lipid Vaccine Biotechnology Behind Rumors of Magnetic Nanotechnology
This is where it gets REALLY GOOD. They are trying to cover up SO CLOSE to their little unholy grail, that it really gives away what they are trying to cover up.
They are MISDIRECTING us. They are MISLEADING us.
RedLegLeader68alerted me to a highly relevant video:
W – can you check this out? (sincerest apologies if already posted; I just got home!)
Magnetism Added To mRNA “Vaccine” Intentionally To Force It Round Your Body
Here is that video, with Stew Peters and Dr. Jane Ruby.
As SOON as I saw this, I realized what is going on. The people who have promoted these ideas onto us are utterly and TOTALLY taking advantage of most people’s lack of scientific training and expectations.
Yeah, you could actually do some kind of cool stuff with vaccines and magnetism….
BUT YOU DON’T NEED TO DO IT.
I don’t know who those people ARE, who are manipulating us, but they are taking advantage of people like us – of people like Stew and Jane. I don’t blame people like us for not knowing better.
When I get into the later post about biomagnetic technology, you will see that there really is EXTREME interest in manipulating our internal biology and biochemistry using magnets, microwaves, radio waves, oscillating magnetic fields, and much, much more. They are doing it right now, in a very basic but sometimes quite elegant way in the laboratory, and they are deeply interested in it. Some of it – maybe even most of it – is alleged to be for good purposes. Whatever. No matter what, they are extremely interested in it.
It is VERY EASY to assume that is what is going on here, but that is NOT what is going on here.
There is no REASON – there is no NEED – to use anything but PLAIN OLD CHEMISTRY AND BIOCHEMISTRY to do what they are doing, in terms of sending the vaccine around in our bodies. No magnets are needed. Absolutely none. Now, of course, “moving around the body” is not supposed to happen, but just ignore THAT little shocker for now. Yeah, that vaccine is supposed to stay right there in the arm muscle, if it was anything close to a normal vaccine.
Nope. All you need is plain old chemistry and biochemistry. And that PLAIN OLD CHEM AND BIOCHEM has to be carefully and delicately DESIGNED. And it centers around the LIPIDS used to make the little nanodroplets. PICK all the right stuff. ADD all the right stuff together. Watch what it does. Tweak it until it does what you want.
Let’s look at that more closely.
I see that data, and I start seeing data that is “off the charts”, so to speak, and that data is even more striking.
This stuff is discussed more fully in my last post about the spike protein, but I was fairly explicit in a recent comment on a daily thread, where I explained WHY shedding is a kind of unintended consequence of the persistence and mobility of the vaccine. You know – little lipid nanodroplets that HANG AROUND might actually get expressed in BIG OLD LIPID MICRODROPLETS coming out of our skin.
We had all (or at least most of us) thought “shedding” the vaccine was impossible, because the vaccine would work quickly and locally to build immunity, not go “moving around”, and certainly not go around “persisting” for – say – 24, 48, 96, or some other absurd number of hours.
COUGH.
No. I’m sorry. I do NOT need “magnets” of any size to explain that SOMEBODY designed these vaccines to PERSIST, to RELOCATE, and – probably accidentally, but who knows – to SHED – you know – like in body lipids that we secrete.
Why the #### do I need MAGNETS, when LIPIDS explain everything?
OK, I’m done here. I need some sleep.
Come up with a new excuse, your Faucists and Rockefelleroids.
Wherein we examine, in something like “MythBusters” style, the dubious “Magnet Challenge”, without relying (too much) on the anti-scientific crutch of scientific authority
First, a confession.
The main reason I am attracted to these videos of people sticking magnets to the COVID vaccination injection sites on their shoulders, is that I love to watch normal people doing science – EVEN IF they are doing it badly, or just plain wrong.
Second, another confession.
I have a more personal reason for liking these videos. I know exactly what it’s like – as a scientist – to look for a tiny magnetic effect with substandard equipment. To me, that is the essence of science – because our equipment is rarely good enough. It could always be better. Somebody ELSE always gets the Large Hadron Collider “LARGE EURO PROVIDER” – while most of us schmoe scientists finagle “not enough time” on somebody else’s cheap and tiny second-hand machine.
And the problem with magnetism is that some of the effects we are looking for are REALLY TINY. The entire UNIVERSE seems to conspire against finding them. So when I see these people with their refrigerator magnets, trying to come up with a definitive answer to a strange and even downright stupid, but wonderful question – “does the COVID vaccine have something magnetic in it?” – against the combined opposition of media, government, and the chumped “fake science” I used to be part of – well, I’m sorry. I am going to root for the underdogs, even though these people are almost universally doing marginal, problematic, or even face-palmy science.
At the very least, they ARE doing science. And SOME of them are doing what I would almost call admirable “kitchen science”.
Most people – and that can include me – will quickly look for an “authoritative ruling” on a scientific question. Yes, that’s GREAT – but it’s not SCIENCE. It’s “armchair science” – pretty much like armchair anything. There is very little skin in the game – no pun intended. But God bless anybody who says “Hey! Let me see if *I* can figure this out for myself!”
Skin in the game. HELL YEAH.
Indeed, I remember the last time I did some kitchen science – and discovered that – despite the LIES of PBS propagandists – masks were robbing me of oxygen and reducing cognition – MEASURABLY.
TL;DR – skip down to “Crucial Experiment” and read how you can prove to yourself that masks cause real and measurable cognitive decline that lasts long after you unmask. NPR and other leftists who say masks don’t affect you and your children are LYING. LOOK, it’s time to be blunt. Senility – Cognitive Decline – …
SO – what I want to do here – is to follow the “Mythbusters” model – a GREAT pathway into science – and “firm up” the “Magnet Challenge”.
I don’t want to decry it. I don’t want to “debunk” it. I want to make it rigorous, so that we can prove TO OURSELVES whether or not (1) people are getting vaccines which have some kind of “magnetic” component (we’ll firm that idea up), and, no matter what, (2) whether such a thing is scientifically possible based upon known science.
Does that sound fair? Does that sound even-handed?
I’m very open to this weird idea of magnetic vaccines – real or hoax. I would love to find out, one way or another, the answers to these to questions – yes or no. I take as much joy in killing theories, as I do in confirming them. And on the way there, when one side starts winning – “brake” or “accelerator” – I instinctively look for the other one to “challenge” what seems to be winning.
This is how the SCULPTURE of “working theory” emerges from the STONE OF TRUTH. Even if, as may be the case here – that sculpture could be a bit of a Fauci bobble-head.
The Plan
We’re going to do this in several parts. This FIRST ARTICLE will concentrate on the Magnet Challenge itself.
FIRST – we look at the Magnet Challenge as has been seen in videos, and figure out (as you will see) what parts are obviously WRONG.
SECOND – we look at MAGNETISM ITSELF – to get some background on what we need to know to FIX the Magnet Challenge. We want to be comfortable with magnetism before we get down to business.
THIRD – we look at how the Magnet Challenge might actually be fixed. We will only get part-way into that.
In the SECOND ARTICLE, coming in a week or two, we look at “making it real” – and ask a crucial question. Are “magnetic vaccines” even possible? And bigger still – are there ANY “magnetic injections” that people with an agenda might try to implement?
You will be shocked.
Magnetism – which is a bit like the kid sister of electricity – is very much like one of the young female characters in a modern “X Men” saga. She’s under-rated and under-appreciated – until she saves everybody’s ass. I personally think magnetism is beautiful – almost to the point of prejudice. Yeah, if somebody finds convincing evidence of a SORDID, wart-like, unbecoming, magnetic monopole, I will let it convince me. But until then, as far as I’m concerned, the magnetic monopole is sacrilege on the order of gay Jesus porn movies where THE VIRGIN AIN’T. Ugly, wrong, and needless. GROW UP!
Now – I’m not going to get into the theory of magnetism itself, because that is quite unnecessary for the task at hand. Steve is doing a marvelous job explaining (1) mass, force and gravitation, (2) velocity and momentum, (3) energy and potential, and (4) introductory electromagnetism. What I’m doing here is leafing off all of that in a very shallow way, into the magnetism of materials – just a wee bit – so that we can look more critically at how to do science honestly.
We are going to see if – just using GOOD kitchen science – we can figure out how to make BAD kitchen science be a thing of the past.
To quote my new favorite video…..
“Don’t reboot it – just patch!”
Magnet Challenge Videos: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
THE BAD
The FIRST “Magnet Challenge” video that I saw was one of the best examples of “bad science” that I have seen in a long time. “Spock wept”, to put it bluntly.
This is the one where the black-masked, “zaftig”, blonde woman appears to be at home in front of her big-screen television set, having just gotten the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, and “tries” to stick a magnet to both shoulders – first the shoulder in which she got the injection, then the other.
It’s very hard to find this or other videos now, because anti-science, pro-authoritarian, Menshevik Soviet diaper-CEO YouTube has hidden most of them. Even Rumble seems to have hidden most of their Magnet Challenge videos. I did find a source video that includes footage from the original, but I’m saving most of that for below. You will see the video in its entirety then.
Instead, here are some stills. First, the lady showing off the vaccinated arm, with the magnet sticking to the injection site.
Next, the other arm, right before she lets go, and the magnet falls off.
It is immediately obvious to anybody with ANY exposure to science that this woman does NOT, in fact, perform this test in an “equal” way on her two arms. Now I’m not saying that she didn’t observe some difference – that the magnet didn’t behave differently between the two shoulders. What I’m saying is that she didn’t give the shoulders an “equal chance” to either stick or fail.
Is it deception? Is it self-deception? We don’t need to know yet. All we need to know, is that it’s not science.
There is a LIST of differences that can be seen in the video.
To begin with, the lady’s vax arm is held at an outward angle, though toward the camera, making the relaxed angle hard to see. In contrast, her non-vax arm is held in tightly and more nearly vertical at the shoulder, with her forearm across her abdomen.
Next, you can see in the second picture above, that she depresses the “non-vax” magnet with her index finger, guaranteeing that there will be a spring force when she releases it – and yes there is, as she very quickly pulls her finger away, and the magnet flies off.
In contrast, she “babies the magnet” on the vax side, gently holding it up with the middles of several fingers, NOT at the tips, and moving it around AND pressing it lightly and repeatedly for several seconds until it takes hold and STAYS. When it finally sticks to her satisfaction, she lets go gingerly.
This is where I want to STOP THE FILM and talk about how minor of an effect she is presumably looking for. You can literally see how TINY it is by the fact that she’s “babying the magnet” on a shoulder that is less than vertical.
What she is doing is trying to demonstrate an opposition of at least 3 forces:
possible minor magnetism
guaranteed reliable gravity
variable “surface forces”
We all understand that “smooth objects may stick temporarily to skin” – right? Every child who has played around in the bathtub realizes that even a bit of moisture can increase this effect, too. I am not going to get into what those surface forces may be, although they are, down deep, “minor electrostatic” in nature.
“Things stick to things”, shall we just say. Not much, always, but quite a bit, sometimes.
Given this fairly large “minor” effect, plus the reliable effect of gravity that varies with angle, we are not being honest if we FAVOR or DISFAVOR either of those effects – gravity or surface attractions – and also spring forces – on one arm versus the other, while using a metric of “falls off or doesn’t fall off”.
She did NOT give it a fair test.
Now – before we go arguing about whether or not there could STILL BE a real effect here, despite her clear BIAS toward “magnetic vaccination”, let’s look at some AWESOME kitchen science.
This kitchen science does NOT disprove magnetic vaccinations. What it DOES do is disprove the simplest forms of the Magnet Challenge as being sufficient to prove magnetic vaccination. It is a subtle point, but one that we must keep in mind if we’re being honest and unbiased.
This brilliant “disproof” of the sufficiency of the “Magnet Challenge”, very ironically, was being BLOCKED by the “Brave” browser. While they stopped censoring THIS video, I’m uncertain if they’re still censoring others.
Not only am I incredibly disappointed in the obvious censorship by Brave – I’m delighted to have in hand an example of why censorship of people TRYING to find the truth is always wrong.
I *delight* in using error to show truth – it’s one of THE BEST WAYS to make people smarter. And yet, the CEOs of Brave and YouTube – obviously intelligent people – engage in such censorship. This is what socialism does. People may not think they’re socialists, but they will carry socialist memes like pack animals – as fervently and reliably as if they were committed socialists. Even “anti-socialists” do this, when they behave as controlled opposition.
Here is the video – maybe it will work with your browser. Like I said, it’s working with Brave now.
Now, I’ve included that embed code just on the off chance that your browser will show the video, but if not, then first, here is a picture of Brave blocking the video…..
Now – let’s look at two stills from the video.
First, we see where a guy has “stuck” a key to a place on his arm that is almost certainly unvaccinated – just above the inside of his wrist.
This is all quite brilliant for multiple reasons. He shows the key, and it is a familiar, cheap, non-steel, light metal, probably mostly zinc or aluminum alloy, key. These are never attracted to a magnet, nor can they be magnetized. They ARE light enough to demonstrate surface forces as being comparable to gravity. Best of all, by using a KEY, which will tend to “torque off” if the key is not pointing “down with gravity”, he can show to some extent the direction “down” in the video,
As seen in the video, surface forces are comparable to gravity. This means that if we state, for the vertical axis (think about Steve’s lessons here), that…..
MF + SF >= GF
[magnetic forces plus surface forces UP must be greater than or equal to gravitational forces DOWN]
…..as a condition of testing for the presence of magnetic forces, then we have just shown that this method cannot be used to show the presence or absence of magnetic forces.
SURFACE FORCES ALONE CAN ACCOUNT FOR RESISTANCE TO A FALL.
And it gets better.
Yes. He actually takes it past vertical – demonstrating that the surface forces are SO STRONG that they can resist a certain amount of “peeling force” by gravity.
Thus, we are DONE.
The Magnet Challenge is NOT sufficient to tell us if people got a “magnetic vaccination”.
THE EXPERIMENT MUST BE MODIFIED OR REPLACED.
And YES – we will get to that in a minute. But first…..
THE UGLY (YET BEAUTIFUL)
Remember that I found a stashed version of the first video of the blonde lady on Bitchute? That bigger stashing video was actually an episode of Del Bigtree’s The Highwire show, with host Jefferey Jaxen, and reporter Carmen Estel of “Mom on the Street”.
In addition to Jefferey providing a good short compilation of some of the prior videos, Carmen actually wandered out onto Laguna Beach and tested a variety of young people. She got 15 people who had gotten vaccines to try the magnet test on their injection site. Out of 15 people, for 6 the magnet “stuck” and for 9 it “did not”.
Go ahead and watch – see what you think.
It was ALMOST good science – but not quite. The attempt was beautiful, but it was still a bit ugly.
The one thing that would have made this experiment actually meaningful, would have been to do a CONTROL EXPERIMENT on the NON-VACCINATED ARM of each participant.
This would NOT have made the experiment perfect, or even good – it would have made it BETTER.
And THAT is where we need to go next. How could we test for a “magnetic vaccine” using “kitchen science” if we really wanted to “do it right”?
Let’s go MYTHBUSTERS.
MythBusting Magnetism and The Human Body
MythBusters is a fascinating part of “Fake Entertainment” that looks at “urban legends and myths” and tries to see if (1) the legends and myths are true, and (2) if not, can the legends and myths be MADE TO BECOME TRUE by “improving” the myth, using better, smarter, or more modern technology.
MythBusters is still a part of “fake science” – mostly by omission. The MythBusters team is not allowed to pursue certain topics or answers, due to pressure by government, industry or activist groups.
Don’t believe me? Try this.
Thus, certain myths are allowed to be debunked, but others are maintained by omission. Most of all, TRUE “myths” are kept in “myth status” by not allowing them to be examined. This is a key part of “fake science”.
Nevertheless, MythBusters does wonders for science. Most of all, the show promotes the true scientific foundation of free and honest inquiry by “normal people”. And while THEY cannot pursue everything, WE (almost) CAN.
We will begin OUR “mythbusting” of vaccine magnetism with even greater freedom than MythBusters, because we will pursue truth regardless of the desires of government, industry, and activist groups.
Let’s start with MRI – Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
One of the most important things you can realize about strong magnetic fields, like those in an MRI machine, is that their danger profiles for metal objects VARY with the SIZE, the COMPOSITION, the SHAPE, and the PLACEMENT of the metal objects.
BIG iron and steel objects like oxygen tanks and floor polishers are extremely dangerous, because they have a lot of IRON and a lot of weight. The forces produced upon them by a strong magnetic field are tremendous. A human being holding onto the object, or in the way of it, is in great danger.
Intermediate sized objects – especially guns – pose intermediate dangers. They tend to get yanked from holsters and fly against the machines, where they can’t be removed until the machine is turned off.
Smaller FREE objects can become missiles, by the field doing WORK on them, to accelerate them to dangerous velocities.
https://youtu.be/ug3e9W5H0jI
You see that title – “WHY ABSOLUTELY NO METAL SHOULD ENTER AN MRI ROOM”? Well, I’m here to tell you, it’s not true. MRI technicians DO let metal into MRI rooms – they are just VERY CAREFUL about what metal goes in and comes out. You will see.
In fact, on the other end of the spectrum, a small implanted metal object – depending upon the SHAPE and LOCATION in the body – may not be dangerous at all. This is why MRI techs ask very detailed questions about possible internal metal objects.
Thus, when “Mythbusters Kari” was injected with an RFID tag containing a ferrite-core antenna, and was stuck into an MRI machine, the tag was NOT heated up, nor was it ripped out of her. In fact, she didn’t notice anything.
This is because the ferrite in the antenna is smaller than a grain of rice, and it is located inside a strong object, located in a structurally strong part of the human body. The total magnetic force on the object, even under a huge magnetic field, is miniscule compared to the weight of a human arm or leg, or to the strength of human skin, flesh, and bone. The small object is happy to remain exactly where it is, without pain or injury.
Even older pacemakers can be happy in older MRI machines, when run properly.
I was surprised to learn, when I got an MRI, that I could NOT wear a necklace, but I could wear my wedding ring, regardless of material. If you think about it, this makes sense. One object (the wedding ring) was slightly outside the machine – the other (the necklace) would not have been. One object (the wedding ring) was firmly held in place by a heavy body part which normally withstands strong forces – the other was not. One object (the necklace) had the potential to fly around and break or tear under the field – the other did not.
Note that both the MRI machine itself AND the little ferrite-core antenna illustrate an important yet very simple principle of magnetism – the idea that “bringing lots of little magnets together” creates a stronger and stronger field. That works in reverse, too. Break the magnet apart, into separate smaller magnets, and the field of each gets weaker and weaker.
The implications here are simple, and are directly related to the experience of MythBuster Kari, who had a SINGLE UNIFIED magnetizable body placed within her. One little “big” magnet.
A REAL “magnetic vaccine” is going to experience no more force than an RFID with a ferrite core antenna, in terms of reacting to a larger magnetic field. Nobody who got a COVID vaccine, even if it was chock full of iron or ferrite nanoparticles, is going to experience anything “ripping out of them” in an MRI – much less next to a rare earth refrigerator magnet. The real question is whether EITHER a real magnetic vaccine or a small magnet placed next to it would experience any visible force AT ALL.
Thus we KNOW that we should expect a VERY SMALL FORCE IF ANY, from ANY type of “magnetic” vaccine. It’s not going to be “magnetically dangerous”.
Yes – a steel razor blade embedded next to one’s aorta might be one thing under an MRI. But small, blunt, magnetizable implants, located in “safe” places where they are strongly supported, are not going to be trouble.
This means that if we are dealing with a SMALL PERMANENT MAGNET – even a small but powerful rare earth magnet – instead of the MRI machine, we are not going to expect a HUGE reaction with any kind of metal under somebody’s skin, or bigger still, if it’s deep in their arm muscle.
And further still – if it is a SMALL effect, we need to start asking EXACTLY HOW SMALL? Is it even going to be visible?
AH – now we’re ready to do REAL SCIENCE. More or less. We will start off with some background, and then get increasingly into “kitchen physics”.
Real Fieldwives of Magnetism
You may not realize it, but pretty much everything reacts to a magnetic field. Most people are only familiar with what reacts VISIBLY to a magnetic field – that being certain objects containing iron, as well as those containing a few less common elements with similar “ferromagnetic” properties
But the truth is, anything with charged parts somewhere in it, on it, or around it, can react with a magnetic field – and EVEN the lowly, fundamental, neutral neutrino, MAY interact with magnetism, by non-standard mechanisms – making the potential magnetic properties of neutrinos a field of study – and (IMO) much more likely to be real, than the horrid chimera of broken theory known as the magnetic monopole.
I don’t want to get too deeply into the kinds of ways that matter responds to magnetic fields, because one really can’t do it without leaning heavily on more obscure aspects of quantum mechanics, but several classifications of response are very useful in understanding what is going on.
Ferromagnetism – is the familiar response of IRON, many types of steel, adjacent metals cobalt and nickel, and other substances like magnetite (lodestone) or chromium dioxide, which can be MAGNETIZED to some degree. These are substances which REALLY LIKE to be in a magnetic field, and to even form permanent magnets themselves.
Paramagnetism – is the property of many elements and substances which have what are called “unpaired electrons”. It is in the same direction as ferromagnetism – meaning such things LIKE to be in a magnetic field. However, paramagnetism is MUCH weaker than ferromagnetism. In fact, it is very difficult to measure, sometimes, because TINY ferromagnetic impurities and contaminants can and will throw off measurements of paramagnetic substances.
Diamagnetism – is the property of things with fully “paired” electrons. It is the “default” magnetism of most things in this world. It is generally extremely weak, and it OPPOSES a magnetic field. Thus, diamagnetic substances want to LEAVE a magnetic field. They repel either end of a magnet – although weakly. Diamagnetism is also difficult to measure properly because of ferromagnetic and paramagnetic impurities.
Now – I want to take a small DETOUR into diamagnetism.
Visible Diamagnetism
Except for a few geeks here, most of you have probably never seen visible diamagnetism before. You could even call it “anti-magnetism”. The reason most have never seen it, is not only because it is weak, but also because unlike common visible [ferro]magnetism, which only needs one common element – IRON – simple visible diamagnetism with objects requires MORE – in most cases THREE more elements. In what follows, we will be seeing very powerful iron-boron-neodymium magnets being repelled by bismuth and graphite – two substances with so much diamagnetism, it can become easily visible.
Here is a beautifully simple demonstration of how water – which is weakly diamagnetic – is repelled by a magnetic field – in this case provided by a strong, modern, permanent Nd-Fe-B magnet.
There are very cool videos of something called diamagnetic levitation. Sometimes these are actually demonstrations of “diamagnetic repulsion being used to stabilize magnetic levitation“. There is a difference, and I want you to understand it. I find that understanding the differences HELPS to understand magnetic effects in general – both diamagnetism and paramagnetism/ferromagnetism.
Here is a table-top demonstration of PURE diamagnetic levitation.
This is a diamagnetic substance – the graphite in an ordinary pencil lead – being pulled down by gravity into a strong magnetic field generated by powerful diametrically magnetized permanent magnets. As the graphite is pulled down, the diamagnetic response of the material increases until it balances gravity. This is simple, pure, diamagnetic repulsion from a magnetic field.
Now, let’s see what one can do with that in a laboratory.
Yes. That frog experiment led to an IgNobel Prize, but the same investigator later got a Nobel Prize for his investigation of a diamagnetic champion – graphite – which he was able to reliably study as 1-layer-thick graphene – which substance is changing the world.
Better yet, this frog experiment is explained as part of a VERY nice explanation of the different kinds of magnetism:
Now – there are also some great pictures and videos of diamagnetic substances “floating” above strong ferromagnets.
Here is a video of it – again – pure diamagnetic levitation – resistance to falling into a magnetic field.
There are other much cooler pictures, however, that are NOT ALWAYS pure diamagnetic levitation. The following three pictures show permanent magnets floating above highly diamagnetic “pyrolytic graphite”. These pictures MAY BE somewhat pure diamagnetic levitation, but it is likely that they are using a “lifter magnet” somewhere above the picture – not only to lift the floating magnet to some extent, but to help stabilize it from moving off the center of the diamagnetic surface.
To understand that physics, go HERE, to the video below, for a great amateur demonstration.
What you will see is diamagnetic repulsion being used to stabilize magnetic levitation.
What this apparatus does is create a little energetic valley between the bismuth poles. Magnetic levitation wants to pull the little magnet up to the bigger magnet above – but diamagnetic repulsion fights against both gravity going DOWN and the magnetic attraction going UP. At just the right amounts (a small range) of magnetic force UP, everything balances in stable levitation.
It’s not as easy to SEE the diamagnetic repulsion / levitation in this case, but again, there are three forces involved – gravity, magnetic attraction, and diamagnetic repulsion.
In the pencil lead demonstration, gravity forces the diamagnetic substance down into the magnetic field until the opposing diamagnetic repulsion balances gravity, creating stable levitation. Similarly for the graphite disk floating over the array of cube magnets.
In this last demonstration, that same sort of repulsion, in reverse, happens at the bottom bismuth plate, but to get better “lift”, the floating magnet is both lightened and center-stabilized by a lifter magnet. A SECOND bismuth plate keeps the floating magnet from going UP to the lifter magnet.
Though if you hanker for the beautiful simplicity of PURE diamagnetic levitation, click this link for 2 awesome videos and 5 images.
NOW – back to REAL LIFE and the question of “magnetic vaccines” – but passing through MORE considerations of different “magnetic” substances.
Visible Paramagnetism
Most “refrigerator magnets” available until recently have been ferrites – which are ferromagnetic ceramics similar to magnetite (lodestone). They are fairly strong ferromagnets, but nothing extraordinary. However, more and more, refrigerator magnets are now neodymium-iron-boron, a.k.a. neodymium magnets. Those are the little, very powerful magnets.
In the above photo, bigger and stronger neodymium magnets are being used to ATTRACT copper (II) sulfate (a.k.a. cupric sulfate) on a balance beam, turning the beam TOWARD the magnet, because cupric sulfate is net PARAMAGNETIC. On the other hand, the same magnets will REPEL the bismuth, which is net DIAMAGNETIC, and make the balance beam rotate AWAY from the magnets. Note that the coinage metals – copper, silver and gold – are all diamagnetic, although less so than bismuth. However, many other metals, if not ferromagnetic, are still paramagnetic. Aluminum, for example, is paramagnetic.
I will show you a great video of the above experiment in just a moment. But before that, I want to encourage YOU to do some science.
Do you have any of those really strong little magnets? (CHECK #1)
Do you have any bismuth bird shot? (CHECK #2D)
Do you have any pencil leads? (CHECK #2D)
Do you have any iron supplements in capsules or pill form? (CHECK #2P)
Do you have any copper sulfate crystals (root killer granules)? (CHECK #2P)
Do you have any magnesium or calcium supplements? (CHECK #2d)
Do you have any multivitamins with or without iron? (CHECK #2dp)
If you answered YES to question 1 and any of questions 2 with CAPITAL LETTERS, then you can actually do the same experiment on your kitchen counter, without a fancy apparatus. What you are doing IS an experiment just like the Magnet Challenge, only you are READY for very small effects, and have SOME IDEA of what a positive or negative result will look like. Questions 2 with small letters are going to be control experiments.
First of all, be careful with the iron supplements and the copper sulfate. Both are mildly poisonous! Keep iron supplements away from kids, especially. Please handle copper sulfate carefully, too. Avoid touching the crystals, and wash your hands or anything that touches it.
What I simply want you to do is to very carefully and gently “dog” each of these things – pills, capsules, crystals, pencil lead, bismuth bird shot – on a FLAT, SMOOTH, LOW-FRICTION SURFACE – like a clean kitchen counter-top or glass range – with a neodymium magnet. Bring the magnet close – closer – closer still – and see what happens.
SPOILER: I will discuss the results below. Do the experiment now, or after the video below.
Here is the GREAT video that shows you what forces to expect.
SPOILER – are you ready?
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
Don’t look yet!
You should see some attractive motion with the iron supplements and the copper sulfate crystals. NOT MUCH, but enough to realize that YES – paramagnetism is REAL, and careful kitchen science will reveal it. And if your magnets are strong enough, you may even see repulsive diamagnetism from the bismuth and the pencil lead.
You will most likely NOT see any motion of the controls – the magnesium or calcium supplements, or the multivitamins. All of these will be mostly diamagnetic, although it is possible that the iron-containing multivitamin may be weakly paramagnetic overall. I could not get mine to budge.
Can you think of any other things you could test? Metal salts are likely to be either invisibly diamagnetic or visibly paramagnetic. Metals themselves are likely to be paramagnetic, although some are diamagnetic. Certain ROCKS are actually ferromagnetic – notably jasper and serpentine – due to the presence of ferromagnetic iron oxides. They will be strongly drawn to a magnet.
You can always TEST things and then look up the magnetic susceptibility of whatever you just tested on the internet. This will prevent any BIAS from creeping in.
Now – where does this leave us?
Well, we’ve seen what these small but powerful magnets do with diamagnetic and paramagnetic substances, and it’s NOT MUCH.
What about ferromagnetic substances?
Visible Transdermal Ferromagnetism
We are now starting to get very close, conceptually, to the “Magnet Challenge”. We are getting used to the idea of very weak forces, and the difficulties in detecting them – particularly with CRAPPY EQUIPMENT.
If you are already thinking “What I saw with iron supplements – barely rolling or sliding on a countertop when a strong magnet got really close – no WAY would I be able to see THAT little force moving a much heavier MAGNET on somebody’s shoulder”, then you are now beginning to realize that the Magnet Challenge is being challenged. But it’s still not disproven by any means. Because NOW we will bring in ferromagnetism – which is much stronger than paramagnetism.
Watch THIS video to begin to see forces that COULD not only move, but maybe even hold up a magnet.
Note that this guy’s implanted magnet is UNDER THE SKIN – not deep in muscle. That would make a HUGE difference in terms of any magnetic test. We can’t be definitive about the “Magnet Challenge” at this point, because we don’t know the strength of the fields from the test magnets, the types of magnetic substance allegedly deposited, or the depth, but we DO know that the depth matters – a LOT.
Now – the first thing that probably surprised you is that he found that much “iron” in sand. That iron is not IRON METAL per se – or at least not much of it is metal. It is mostly RUST (Fe2O3) and MAGNETITE (Fe3O4). If you’ve ever panned for gold, then you know that sand of all kinds contains a LOT of “black sand” – magnetite – and THAT is probably most of what he had on his finger in the video.
Magnetite – like lodestone – is an example – a NATURAL example – of a ferrite – a mineral or ceramic metal oxide where the metal is mostly or completely IRON.
SO – we can now begin to think that IF a vaccine deposited a FERROMAGNETIC substance – IN ENOUGH QUANTITY – and close enough to the skin – then MAYBE it could visibly affect a magnet brought close to the skin.
Now – before I got “geeky” on this, I simply tried a test. Yes – *I* tried the Magnet Challenge. It’s true, I never got a COVID vaccine, but I get lots of vaccines in my shoulders. Maybe one of THEM was injecting me with something magnetic. It was worth a test – right?
I can tell you this much. As far as I can tell, NO SHOT in my vaccination history has deposited anything in EITHER ONE of my shoulders, which interacts “human-detectably” with my neodymium refrigerator magnets. These are the SAME MAGNETS that can demonstrate the paramagnetism of iron supplements – both ferrous sulfate and ferrous glycinate. But if I “baby” the magnets on my shoulders – all over – I get nothing perceptible.
Now – granted – my fingers are not, in my scientific opinion, sensitive enough to pick up a paramagnetic effect like the drawing of the neodymium magnets to the iron supplements. Thus, my touch would not pick up too weak a ferromagnetic effect on a neodymium magnet. Likewise, my eyes are not sensitive enough to see those magnets reacting in an equal and opposite way to the iron supplements. But maybe they could pick up something stronger.
An easy way to see how neodymium refrigerator magnets react with a small amount of a ferromagnetic substance is to use a standard household staple. Unlike construction staples you get at Lowes, or office staples you get at Staples, household staples are fairly small. A box of 5000 of them weighs 0.38 pounds, including the box. Ignoring our allowed deduction of the paper box weight (we’re generous), that works out to 34.5 (heck, let’s call it an even 35) milligrams per staple.
The staple is made of zinc-coated steel, with the steel being mostly iron and carbon. But we’ll be generous, and pretend like it’s ALL IRON.
Thus, we are going to attribute whatever we see that staple do, to 35 mg of iron, when it could be a smaller amount of iron and even stronger. We’re being CONSERVATIVE in gathering our “expectations of metallic iron as normal, magnetic steel”. But you will still see that the rough numbers are very powerful.
First of all, let’s look at why I was so delighted that the staple comes in at around 35 mg. It turns out that my exemplary iron supplements contain roughly 30 or 60 milligrams of elemental iron, as either ferrous bis(glycinate) or ferrous sulfate, both paramagnetic. Thus, the amounts of iron are comparable, and we can compare the differences in forces between paramagnetic and ferromagnetic iron DIRECTLY, without adjusting the scale.
First, let’s look at MAX MAGNETISM.
If you let the magnet approach the staple, the staple will FLY TOWARD THE MAGNET at a distance of roughly 1.5-2.0 centimeters – basically 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch. Once in contact with the magnet, the staple is strongly held.
How strongly? Well, we can actually measure that. The staple, stuck through a sheet of A4 paper (comparable to 8.5 x 11), will easily hold the single sheet of paper against gravity. Will that scale up? First, I tried 10 sheets – NO DICE – gravity wins. But if I tear off sheets of paper slowly, at 8 sheets of A4, my neodymium magnets will still hold all that paper against gravity through the attraction of a SINGLE staple.
If I weigh those 8 sheets, it comes out to between 30 and 40 grams on a cheap postal spring scale. Let’s just call that 35 grams for super-duper convenience.
What this means is that magnetic forces on a 35 mg staple by that neodymium magnet are roughly 35,000 mgs, where we are being really horrible about pretending that mass is weight and vice versa, “because Earth”.
Stated differently, the magnetic force on the staple is roughly 1000 times the gravitational force on the staple.
And YES – we can really work with that. Holding up 8 sheets of paper is EASY KITCHEN SCIENCE. Much easier to demonstrate than rocking a capsule on a counter.
NOW – here is the real kicker.
Wouldn’t it be great if I could put that staple under my skin and see how my magnet reacted to it? It might be painful, but all in the name of science – right?
WELL, it turns out that you don’t HAVE to “get a piercing“. You can FAKE IT really easily.
Neodymium Head Fakes and Phony Implants
Because humans have SO MANY thin places and opposable body parts, it is not hard to FAKE the implantation of ferromagnetic substances, and then actually STUDY how a magnet behaves near them.
Well, I did this, and what I found – very SHOCKING – is that it is EXACTLY like you would imagine it in the “Magnet Challenge”. Or maybe even STRONGER.
The magnet will “do stuff”, and you will go “WHOA!”
You can PINCH a staple easily between finger and thumb, so that it is more than “skin deep”, and then move a magnet around the pinched fingertips. You can be very rigorous about maintaining a strong pinch, and insure that the metal is a certain number of millimeters “deep” in the pinch. You can control the magnet to see exactly how it behaves. And you can repeat this – OVER and OVER – looking for “tells” that the staple is there.
In my experience, the presence of something affecting the magnet was unmistakable.
Want to get that staple REALLY deep? Put it on the web of your thumb and index finger, and “close it up”.
I was able to make the staple so deep that I could not “feel it there” with a single neodymium magnet. BUT – and this is very cool – with a stack of SIX neodymium magnets, I could easily get the stack to “attract” to the deep staple in a way that I could FEEL WITH MY FINGERS. I could make the stack of magnets slow down – slide more tightly – dawdle – stick – and behave EXACTLY like it seemed the people were either FEELING or THINKING THEY WERE FEELING in the “Magnet Challenge” videos.
Do you see what we’re doing here?
We’re doing POSITIVE CONTROL EXPERIMENTS ON THE MAGNET CHALLENGE.
We are showing that what we SENSE is going on in the “Magnet Challenge” videos is a REALITY – likely from years of experience with the realities of permanent magnets in home or office. We’re not saying that the people in the Magnet Challenge videos are correct, because self-deception is very convincing to others, and thus propagates deceit. But we can be certain that there IS a reality of magnetic behavior which both the people in the videos, and we the viewers, are EXPECTING.
Now – do you want to make a prediction about what would happen if we “felt up” MythBuster Kari’s RFID with a neodymium magnet? Do it! I’m about to give you MORE DATA, and then you can either change or STRENGTHEN your prediction.
That gray stuff inside the copper antenna coil? THAT is ferrite. It’s a ferrite antenna core. You can see it more clearly here, in an RFID designed to broadcast body temperature.
It’s not a HARD ferrite like your old-school refrigerator magnets, that hold a magnetization. It’s a SOFT ferrite, designed for an antenna, that changes magnetization easily.
HERE are 4 examples that you can BUY. They were selected for being small enough to fit into an RFID tag used for pets, livestock, or MythBuster gingers.
Hey, that’s pretty wild! The average of 20 and 40 is 30 milligrams – pretty much in the ballpark of both a staple and those iron supplements.
Well SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE!
Gomer Pyle reacts to the size and mass of an RFID antenna’s ferrite core.
These ferrite cores are about the LENGTH and WEIGHT of a folded-down staple, but have a slightly bigger diameter – maybe a few staples bundled.
So what does this mean?
Fixing The Magnet Challenge
We’re now ready to begin thinking about how we might FIX the “Magnet Challenge”.
I’ve given you enough information about the size of ferrite cores, and the real behavior of staples “pretending” to be implants LIKE those containing ferrite antenna cores, that you are probably guessing – like me – that we might be able to find Kari Byron’s RFID implant by “babying a magnet” over her bicep and “feeling” for a response.
We could likely convince OURSELVES that the “challenge” potentially works, if it is ACTUALLY given the proper things to work with, by judicious and honest application of a strong permanent magnet under sensitive observation, to an actual ferromagnetic implant.
The problem is, of course, that the tiny response of the magnet to an embedded staple is just not all that convincing unless you do it yourself. An RFID tag is almost certainly comparable. Sure, you can “baby the magnet” and an honest observer may be able to tell that it’s “sticking” a little bit, but that simply doesn’t have VIRAL convincing abilities.
Well, there was ONE MORE staple experiment that I did, that I didn’t tell you about – YET. It gives away the most important “fix” of all – which is not so much at the MAGNET end, but at the HUMAN end.
Yeah, if you ask me, men don’t look all that great in earrings – and if they’re CLIP-ONS – egads. Is there anything LOWER than clip-ons?
SO, this Junkyard Wolf tried to see if he could pretty himself up with a staple earring, using his moderately weak neodymium magnets. That actually worked – although just barely – and a bit painfully, because the staple preferred to “get close” to the magnet at one end, thus pointing END-ON toward the magnet. This appears to be, in some ways, “flexible diamagnetic shaping” of the field by the flesh and the staple compromising a bit. The magnet can get closer to ONE END of the staple, moving the diamagnetic interference outward from the field, so the system does what it needs to do to reach a lower energy. With a stack of SIX neodymium magnets, the staple was downright painful, and the stack of magnets could be used to manipulate the earlobe in a very convincing way. I could actually hang the stack of magnets like a pendant earring, by letting the staple press in very close to the magnets though my earlobe.
It would have looked great on film, but – well – I’m a bit camera-shy lately.
Thus, we are led to the idea that the Magnet Challenge needs to be VISUAL to be convincing – and the visual nature needs to either EXCLUDE other forces (like surface effects), dwarf them (like moving skin around in a way that surface forces simply cannot), or show other VISUAL effects demonstrating a strong induced magnetic field at the site (perhaps by enchaining small magnetized objects like paper clips between the proposed ferrite and the magnet).
Sticking lovely Kari Byron into an MRI machine proved that implanted ferrite-core RFIDs are not “missiles of death and dismemberment” under strong magnetic fields, but it did NOT disprove that such items can be LOCATED manually and qualitatively by smaller, hand-held, strong permanent magnets.
Thus, here are some of the most convincing things that I saw while experimenting with my “positive controls”.
hanging of magnets STRONGLY against gravity, jiggling them to disprove that they are sticking by surface effects. This means “show more stick than the hanging key”. Note that even the magnet FALLING OFF from a true magnetic attraction is very convincing. The RELEASE from a magnetic attraction versus a surface stick is very diagnostic visually. A surface stick “peels”. A suddenly failing magnetic attachment “lets go”.
watching the magnet spontaneously accelerate horizontally and “slap” against skin when fastened to the end of a loosely-held, lightweight, floppy, plastic or paper “holder” of some kind. This motion is unmistakable. Suspending the magnet from a thread would work just as well (I believe Gail suggested this). Static electricity can be disproved if needed in the same video by a negative control to both flesh and magnet using paper, feather, etc.
moving skin by tugging and pulling on the magnet – NOT by pushing. This demonstrates attraction to an embedded object or objects – NOT surface forces
Now – is it possible to get even more “geeky” than that?
Absolutely.
First, let me say that normal “stud-finders” don’t work. To be more exact, they SHOULD NOT work. Nevertheless, I checked, and was pleased that Physics is intact. A common modern stud finder does NOT pick up my staple controls AT ALL – even a BLIP. This is not surprising – most stud-finders are not metal detectors. Even the ones that ARE metal-detecting are looking for steel studs and large steel nails in wooden studs. Small bits of metal like staples are NOISE to such tools.
But what about real metal detectors?
Not sure about you, but I SEE METAL. Copper, to be specific. I also see ferrites – metal oxides with substantial magnetic properties – but not so sure that modern metal detectors would fall for metal oxides, as this would cause a lot of trouble.
Arse Technocratica seems to think that metal detectors don’t find RFIDs.
“Implantable microchips are compatible with MRI machines and are not picked up by metal detectors or airport scanners.”
This does not necessarily mean RFIDs can’t be found by either metal scanners or airport detectors – it may simply mean they are found but rejected at normal settings.
I can tell you FOR A FACT that TSA-style hand-wanded metal detectors CAN (when used properly) pick up a SINGLE STAPLE underneath several sheets of paper. Yes. And not just with the sensitivity turned up to “high”, but on their normal setting.
Bottom line – I’m leaving open the possibility of small ferrite-core metal-wire antennas being detectable using metal detectors and other types of scanners.
HOWEVER – ALL of our theories about RFIDs with ferrite antennas are thrown into the dumpster by ONE PICTURE in that Ars Technica article.
This one.
WAIT A MINUTE. The needle is THAT BIG?
No way.
I consider it IMPOSSIBLY unlikely – that people getting the COVID vaccine were injected with the literal HORSE NEEDLES that are used to place RFIDs in people.
I’m sorry – there is NO WAY that monster needle is getting stuck into the average Joe or Jane getting a COVID vaccination. Not without MASSIVE social reporting of “huge needles” and “incredibly painful shots” which would – OH BY THE WAY – leave a big old lump. Sorry – THAT ain’t happening.
Look at the product:
This is where I say…..
“No way – this is not what people are getting with their Pfizer and Moderna shots. NO WAY. This Magnet Challenge is either total bullshit – or something ELSE is going on. People are NOT getting “chipped” with these big implants. Back to the drawing board”.
Seriously. Something is NOT RIGHT about the idea that people are getting “chipped”. A chip implant would be one of those little glass jobs with an antenna. Whatever is happening – it’s not THAT.
SO – if people are not getting what amount to “publicly known science” of RFID tags, with little ferrite antenna cores that MIGHT attract a magnet, what else could they possibly be getting that might still draw a magnet?
LET’S INVESTIGATE.
That will be the NEXT part of this series.
Stay tuned for Part II, in which we will examine the shocking REAL science of “magnetic” medicine, biotechnology, and nanotechnology, and how it COULD indeed relate to “magnetic vaccines”.
W
Stay Tuned For Part II…..
Referenced Discussions
We had numerous discussions of this topic on the site – here are the big or important ones. Please see them for extensive discussions and early attempts to understand the magnetization phenomenon.
/article-new/2021/01/apple-privacy.jpg)
