“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
I just wanted to document two things for the record, while I had the evidence in hand, before the “usual suspects” (Twitter, Google, etc.) cover it all up.
First – the “scientific misconduct” attack.
Second – the “big tech malign error” attack.
Assault With a Bik’s Pen
This is an interesting story about my encounter with some kind of “Act Blue” but “Fake Red” pharma-defending propagandist who alerted me to something I had not been aware of – that the scientific establishment has tried to attack HCQ researcher Didier Raoult by abusing a kind of scientific fraud-hunter named Elisabeth Bik.
Follow this conversation and you will learn the details.
It started with somebody publishing details about the attack on a dissident “Ivermectin doc” who I follow on Twitter.
Dr. Bowden is a Board Certified Stanford educated doctor from Houston, TX who’s treated & saved more than 5,500 patient lives, including my mom when she had Covid.
This tweet cites a study by the University of Kansas Medical Center, claiming that ivermectin has no effect. THAT is a whole ‘nuther topic, which is very interesting, and which implicated KUMC (not to be confused with UMKC) as engaging in woke politicized science, but set that aside for now.
Here was one nice response to the attack.
oh wow, it's almost as if they did everything wrong in this study. what are the odds?
"symptoms of acute infection for 7 days or less"
fucking lol. honestly, this study says more about you, than ivermectin.
There ARE indeed some big criticisms of that study – I believe that Pierre Kory had some of them – but set that issue aside. Watch a PHARMA RAT rush in, as soon as I say something which besmirches their money-maker remdesivir.
My comment:
What really shocks me is how bent out of shape the "mass formation med echoes" get over a drug with almost no side effects and admittedly limited antiviral activity (ivermectin), while utterly silent about remdesivir, proven to cause organ failure, too toxic for Ebola use. WTH
I mean, what the hell! The problems of remdesivir are very well documented, and I read about the organ failure MYSELF – not only the original failures in the Ebola trials, but massive kidney failure problems during COVID treatment. I read the (per Fauci) key paper myself, including the data section, and was shocked at how blithely Fauci had written off multiple kidney failures in the TREATED group, well above any occurring in the placebo group. NASTY!!!
This PhillyPharmaBoy either doesn’t know what he’s talking about, or he’s lying. But I remained nice.
Here was my response.
I will definitely agree about ineffectiveness (see pix). However, IIRC, the original remdesivir study that Fauci cited with Trump as "gold standard" showed much worse results than Raoult showed in his full HCQ/AZM study, & the kidney failure rate under remdesivir was shocking. pic.twitter.com/22PZyI5ScN
I am missing something. Are you comparing Ebola to COVID? That comparison cannot be made. Oh, and Raoult is under criminal investigation for massive long-term fraud, including his hydroxychloroquine studies.
What the FUCK! “That comparison cannot be made”? A drug with a kidney failure problem in one disease can’t be compared to the same drug having a kidney failure problem with a similar disease of the same basic type? LOL!
But WHAT THE HELL!
“Oh, and Raoult is under criminal investigation for massive long-term fraud, including his hydroxychloroquine studies.”
That was the first I had heard about any “investigation” of Raoult.
My “foxhole buddy” on Twitter responded immediately.
I then did some quick research, and realized that these science progs were pulling a “Peekaboo James” attack investigation on Raoult! NASTY!!! Communist, fascist, progressive SWINE!
Exactly. Looks like woke-sci girl Bik (who does have a record of *selectively* pursuing science fraud) went after Raoult as a Covidian virtue signal, and he fought back. Good. I've read several of Raoult's papers, and he's a good researcher, IMO.https://t.co/nufjg7Ay2T
My buddy of the moment called her a straight-up fraud, but IMO this Bik lady is a victim, too – basically an autistic, woke “error-hunter”, much like the “plagiarism-hunters” who look for places where people have gotten lazy on citations, and are vulnerable like ALL academics are, with enough spotlight and draconian-enough standards.
Bik was used to go after Raoult, and she will pay the price of the Trump Curse.
From what little I have read now, she's good at casing shade and doubt, but may have gotten too far out over her skis in going after Raoult. An innocent man who knows it, is a very bad person for a serial accuser, trained on only guilty parties, to tangle with. Unforced error.
all these 'debunkers' eventually reveal themselves. Susan Oliver, the ultimate grifting 'debunker' jumped the shark when she claimed mRNA in mother's milk wasn't a big deal. a few of her more recent 'productions' have been pretty colourful to say the least…
I checked this out. It was a horrible pile-on of woke bullshitters, exactly like what all those lying NAT-SEC fascists did to Trump, for which 50-60 LIARS need to not only lose their security clearances, but in my opinion, go to prison as well, for abusing their credentials.
I do hope that also happens to these attackers of Raoult, with their precious “Expressions of Concern”!
Expressions of concern! Sacré bleu!
Another sad expression of the new Lysenkoism, IMO.
That was it. PhillyPharmaBoy was done with us. NO SALE.
SO – this was where I first learned about the “Bik” attack on Raoult.
My question now – what is the status of the situation?
I can find NOTHING in the English-speaking world about this. No further information, other than moans of sympathy for Bik, that mean old Raoult SUED her for attacking him.
It LOOKS like there is no news that serves the narrative, so nobody is talking about the confrontation. It LOOKS like Didier Raoult must be winning.
I needed to get into the French side of the web, if I was going to find anything.
And THAT is when I went looking for any word on the situation in Raoult’s Twitter account.
The guy writes almost entirely in French, and nobody comments on his timeline in anything but French, but we have Google Translate – R-I-I-I-I-I-G-H-T???
Google Mistranslate
This was cute, and is very typical of the kinds of “knives in the back” which can be done with “bad I.T.” while being passed off as an error, accident, or other plausibly deniable non-human problem. And, of course, if A.I. is responsible for this lie, then the situation is even worse, but I’m not ready to help them pass the blame to Rogue Woke A.I.
In looking for any – ANY – news about Didier Raoult’s lawsuit against Elisabeth Bik, I went to Raoult’s Twitter account, and began scanning down below his top, pinned Tweet, which was a kind homage to the director of his institute, who appears to be resigning. Hopefully she is not being forced into resignation, but who knows – things are bad right now, in Globonazi France, and I can imagine that there is yet another attempt to “take care of” Raoult before the next phony pandemic can take place.
Take out a friendly or honest director, and put an opponent or rat fink in place. Oldest trick in the book.
Anyway, I noticed this tweet:
Notre étude sur la baisse de la charge virale par le traitement par hydroxychloroquine dans le covid est en ligne et confirme notre première étude.Nous avons fait valider les données de la première par huissier montrant que l'émission''Complément d' enquête'' utilisait des faux.
Notre étude sur la baisse de la charge virale par le traitement par hydroxychloroquine dans le covid est en ligne et confirme notre première étude.Nous avons fait valider les données de la première par huissier montrant que l’émission”Complément d’ enquête” utilisait des faux.
Translated from French by [Google]
Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. used fakes.
There is no chance that this perfectly reversing bad translation is an accident. This is deliberate sabotage under the color of a program error.
The mistranslation is easily removed/prevented by adding the missing space in “étude.Nous”, which results in (using Google Translate):
Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. We had the data from the premiere validated by a bailiff showing that the ”Complément d’Enquête” program was using fakes.
Sneaky.
For completeness and durability of my evidence, screen captures:
Missing Space:
Added Space:
I alerted Raoult to this very nasty jab by the Nasty Jabbists:
S'il vous plaît, remarquez comment à cause d'un espace manquant, Google traduit "par erreur" ce tweet en un terrible aveu de fraude!
"Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. used fakes."
Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. We had the data from the premiere validated by a bailiff showing that the ''Complément d'Enquête'' program was using fakes.
For the visually impaired or deprived, my tweets, including the Google translations:
S’il vous plaît, remarquez comment à cause d’un espace manquant, Google traduit “par erreur” ce tweet en un terrible aveu de fraude! [Please notice how due to a missing space, Google “erroneously” translates this tweet into a terrible admission of fraud!]
“Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. used fakes.”
Ajout d’un espace (étude. Nous): [Addition of a space …]
Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. We had the data from the premiere validated by a bailiff showing that the ”Complément d’Enquête” program was using fakes.
It’s also worth looking at the other tweets in the thread, and their translations.
The second tweet simply says “Reference” and provides a link to this article.
The role of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in lowering the viral load of patients with COVID-19 is controversial. In our Institute, we treated more than 30,000 people with COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021, using the same diagnostic tools and the same treatment dosages. In this retrospective comparative study of data collected over this period, we aimed to compare the viral clearance in the nasopharynx as determined by qPCR in patients who were treated with HCQ and those who were not. As a new feature, we adjusted the data according to the most significant confounding factors (age, initial viral load, and timescale between the onset of symptoms and treatment). Of the 1 276 patients selected from our database, 776 were treated with HCQ and 500 were not. Viral clearance in the treatment group was reached significantly earlier than in the non-treatment group, at days 5, 10 and 30. These differences remain significant after adjustments for confounding factors. In conclusion, although age, initial viral load, and time to treatment do influence the viral load in patients with COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin still independently significantly lowered viral load more rapidly than other treatments, including azithromycin alone.
Peer review status: UNDER REVIEW
22 Mar 2023 Submitted to Journal of Medical Virology
Cite as: Philippe Brouqui, Jean-Christophe Lagier, P. Parola, et al. Viral clearance in patients with COVID-19: associated factors and the role of antiviral treatment. Authorea. March 22, 2023. DOI: 10.22541/au.167948825.59270994/v1
The translation of the third tweet is the best.
Again, as text:
” Ce qui me bouleverse ce n’ est pas que tu m’ aies menti, c’ est que je ne pourrai plus te croire” Nietzsche
Translated from French by [Google]
“What upsets me is not that you lied to me, it’s that I won’t be able to believe you anymore” Nietzsche
SO – the bottom line is simple.
The other side is NOT giving up.
They lie, they cheat, and they attack good men by scurrilous means.
They sacrifice their own in the process.
The Trump Curse is real, and the WOKE are BROKEN when they attack the good and the true.
And when we stand up for what is right, we WIN in the end.
TRANS is clearly not an organic, ground-up movement. It seems to have some shadowy, top-down implementation, that speaks to a non-human or anti-human origin. When people call it demonic, I have to agree. If people called it alien, I would not dismiss the charge.
One of the first people to note how much of a role BILLIONAIRE FAMILIES have in the TRANS agenda, was Jennifer Bilek. People don’t generally remember her name in that regard, but she is the one who exposed the deep role of the notorious Pritzkers in promoting TRANS.
The Billionaire Family Pushing Synthetic Sex Identities (SSI)
The wealthy, powerful, and sometimes very weird Pritzker cousins have set their sights on a new God-like goal: using gender ideology to remake human biology
This Substack hosts a very UN-SEXY YouTube video that I cannot recommend enough. The video is overly talky, repeatedly tangential, repetitive, progressive-centric, and “TERF-jargony” (trans-excluding radical feminist), and yet it contains information that really breaks open the entire TRANS conspiracy.
If you want to understand WHY Matt Walsh vs. sex surgery profiteering was so instantly successful in Tennessee, and why the FIGHT BACK by MK trans shooters was necessarily centered there, this explains it.
If you want to understand why TRANS has become enshrined in Jaydolph Inslee’s Washington state and Pritzker’s Chicago madhouse, those too.
It even explains why TRANS is slowly creeping up on Ohio, and WHO is responsible for the importation (DePat is gonna guess this one).
Like I said, this is an important video. Enjoy!
W
PS – this lady is definitely on the mark – the “antisemitism defense” is already in play.
How Two Fallen Theories of Medicine May Herald the Fate of Global Warming / Climate Change
Bad science does not stand forever, but it may stand long enough for people to make a lot of money on it. THAT will be the THEME of the three huge science scandals I’m going to discuss.
In case you’re short on time, the TLDR…..
TL;DR – Two fresh scandals showing how industry money and scientific misconduct kept bad theories “alive” for decades, may explain why the bad science behind politically useful climate alarmism persists.
I. Serotonin Uber Alles
The “serotonin scandal” is very diffuse, which is why it’s in many ways analogous to “climate change”. The bottom line is that what the pharmaceutical industry tells patients about antidepressants, and what scientists know about antidepressants, are not the same thing.
It’s best to start off with the following Tucker Carlson video.
An extremely important selling point of antidepressants, used by both doctors and the pharmaceutical industry, is the idea that people who are depressed, and therefore “need” to take them, actually have some kind of chemical imbalance in their brain that needs to be fixed. More often than any other chemical alleged to be “imbalanced” is serotonin – and hence the emergence of SSRIs, meaning serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors.
Carlson’s centerpiece is a recent metaanalysis of antidepressant research which showed there is little or no evidence for this “chemical imbalance” assertion.
Antidepressants may work in some people, and thank God they do, but IF they do, and WHEN they do, the simple “chemical imbalance theory” is probably not the reason why.
There is a very good explanation of the study HERE:
No evidence that depression is caused by low serotonin levels, finds comprehensive review
After decades of study, there remains no clear evidence that serotonin levels or serotonin activity are responsible for depression, according to a major review of prior research led by UCL scientists.
The new umbrella review – an overview of existing meta-analyses and systematic reviews – published in Molecular Psychiatry, suggests that depression is not likely caused by a chemical imbalance,and calls into question what antidepressants do. Most antidepressants are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), which were originally said to work by correcting abnormally low serotonin levels. There is no other accepted pharmacological mechanism by which antidepressants affect the symptoms of depression.
Lead author Professor Joanna Moncrieff, a Professor of Psychiatry at UCL and a consultant psychiatrist at North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT), said: “It is always difficult to prove a negative, but I think we can safely say that after a vast amount of research conducted over several decades, there is no convincing evidence that depression is caused by serotonin abnormalities, particularly by lower levels or reduced activity of serotonin.
“The popularity of the ‘chemical imbalance’ theory of depression has coincided with a huge increase in the use of antidepressants. Prescriptions for antidepressants have risen dramatically since the 1990s, with one in six adults in England and 2% of teenagers now being prescribed an antidepressant in a given year.
“Many people take antidepressants because they have been led to believe their depression has a biochemical cause, but this new research suggests this belief is not grounded in evidence.”
Just for the record, I am personally NOT a fan of these sorts of “metaanalysis” papers. In my opinion they tend to be QUASI-OPINIONS with a veneer of science. However, in my own opinion, metaanalyses can be useful when highly conclusive or by reinterpreting data – but should be trusted even less than normal observational science.
Now – it is important to point out that this metaanalysis is not actually telling us anything NEW. Most scientists in the field ALREADY KNEW from all the various studies that were looked at by the metaanalysis, that the simple “chemical imbalance” idea was a load of crap. They’ve known this for YEARS.
REALLY? Yes. Really.
A good description of the state of things is here:
A Popular Theory About Depression Wasn’t “Debunked” by a New Review
The title is a bit deceptive – at least more so than the link which adds “it got debunked years ago”. Ah, the techniques of clickbait!
Anyway, the title could rightfully say:
A Still-Popular But Unproven Old Theory About Depression Wasn’t “Debunked” By A New Review – It Was Simply Confirmed To STILL Be Unsupported By The Data, Despite Being Pushed For Decades By Doctors And Big Pharma Who KNEW It Wasn’t True
Please click the link if you want all the details, but my proposed title says it all. People kept using the theory as a sales and prescription gimmick. Big Pharma “suggested” the theory to doctors, and doctors “suggested” the theory to patients, to get them to take a kind of drug that patients are sometimes very resistant to taking.
Remember – antidepressants do, in fact, work for many patients – particularly for very serious cases of depression. Many people who in the past had to be hospitalized, can now live happy, functional lives in society because of these drugs.
It’s understandable that doctors try to convince patients to take the drugs they think will work to treat their problems.
But should your kids be getting antidepressants because of “school trouble”?
A whole ‘nuther question.
Because THAT is the end result of the little white lie that “people can have an imbalance that needs these drugs.”
We NORMALIZED antidepressents by NORMALIZING an ABNORMALITY that didn’t even exist.
ANYWAY – if the very fact that a WRONG THEORY has been KNOWINGLY spoon-fed to you by “the experts” for DECADES, is not giving you ideas about “climate change” – particularly in the post-COVID world…..
BUT WAIT.
Not quite yet. We have ANOTHER scandal to look at, first.
II. It’s Bush’s Beta Amyloid’s Fault!
This scandal is at the opposite end of the spectrum, from the above one, in which an entire industry and all of medicine KNOWINGLY told a little white lie to the public.
In this case, ONE SCIENTIST tipped the scales inappropriately, sending the entire world, including the rest of science, on a wild goose chase.
The LIE was only caught after years, and almost accidentally.
This is a rather long and interesting story, and I’m not going to recount it all here. But I will give you links and extensive quotes. It’s FASCINATING.
One of the best quick summaries is in, of all places, The Daily Kos.
Last month, drug company Genentech reported on the first clinical trials of the drug crenezumab, a drug targeting amyloid proteins that form sticky plaques in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease patients. The drug had been particularly effective in animal models, and the trial results were eagerly awaited as one of the most promising treatments in years. It did not work. “Crenezumab did not slow or prevent cognitive decline” in people with a predisposition toward Alzheimer’s.
Last year, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) narrowly approved the use of Aduhelm, a new drug from Biogen that the company has priced so highly that it’s expected to drive up the price of Medicare for everyone in America, even those who never need this drug. Aduhelm was the first drug to be approved that fights the accumulation of those “amyloid plaques” in the brain. What makes the approval of the $56,000-a-dose drug so controversial is that while it does decrease plaques, it doesn’t actually slow Alzheimer’s. In fact, clinical trials were suspended in 2019 after the treatment showed “no clinical benefits.” (Which did not keep Biogen from seeking the drug’s approval or pricing it astronomically.)
Over the last two decades, Alzheimer’s drugs have been notable mostly for having a 99% failure rate in human trials. It’s not unusual for drugs that are effective in vitro and in animal models to turn out to be less than successful when used in humans, but Alzheimer’s has a record that makes the batting average in other areas look like Hall of Fame material.
And now we have a good idea of why. Because it looks like the original paper that established the amyloid plaque model as the foundation of Alzheimer’s research over the last 16 years might not just be wrong, but a deliberate fraud.
This story is fantastic, and so I recommend starting with the above Daily Kos article.
Before going into more detail, let me begin to give you my perspective on Alzheimer’s drugs.
I’ve watched a lot of drug classes accumulate new and improved drugs over nearly half a century of interest in the topic, but the TWO categories that have stood out to ME as the WORST in terms of success have been antivirals and Alzheimer’s drugs.
Antivirals first.
As you have seen over the last two and a half years, antivirals are not impossible to find, and while they don’t work 100% of the time, they’re still sometimes VERY helpful.
What has been more shocking to me is that it’s clear that the pharmaceutical industry frequently and reliably OPPOSES successful antivirals, when they can’t make money off them. The industry wants NEW antivirals they can patent, and they are willing to DEFAME and DENY old antivirals, even SUPERIOR and SAFER antivirals, just to create a market for new ones.
New antivirals that may be CRAP, and dangerous as hell. And they will even LIE to the Commander In Chief about them.
But set the antivirals aside for now, knowing that the situation is corrupt.
Anti-Alzheimer’s drugs are even worse, because THEY JUST DON’T WORK. They’re notorious for not actually working. They’ve never worked. In desperation, the FDA occasionally approves these worthless drugs, if only for investigation, but they are “mercy punts”. The drugs get approved, as long as they don’t show too many side effects, because they are “better than nothing”. But that’s it.
The drugs out there for dementia, senility and Alzheimer’s are WORTHLESS.
A LOT of people thought this was suspicious. I was one of them. Every once in a while, when researchers would reveal just how BAD the next drug actually was – how terrible and limited the results were – I would “go back to my mental drawing board” and ask the question:
“Why don’t these drugs work? Maybe the theory behind them is wrong. What could the truth possibly be?”
HA! I had no idea! No clue!
NOBODY – and I mean nobody – suspected that it was because of FRAUD.
At least, not until recently.
So let’s move on to the fraud in more detail. SCIENCE MAGAZINE.
I am including a long segment which is just the beginning of the article. Please note an important point – the investigator was actually looking at a DIFFERENT fraud in the same field of Alzheimer’s research, when he found this one.
BLOTS ON A FIELD?
A neuroscience image sleuth finds signs of fabrication in scores of Alzheimer’s articles, threatening a reigning theory of the disease
In August 2021, Matthew Schrag, a neuroscientist and physician at Vanderbilt University, got a call that would plunge him into a maelstrom of possible scientific misconduct. A colleague wanted to connect him with an attorney investigating an experimental drug for Alzheimer’s disease called Simufilam. The drug’s developer, Cassava Sciences, claimed it improved cognition, partly by repairing a protein that can block sticky brain deposits of the protein amyloid beta (Aβ), a hallmark of Alzheimer’s. The attorney’s clients—two prominent neuroscientists who are also short sellers who profit if the company’s stock falls—believed some research related to Simufilam may have been “fraudulent,” according to a petition later filed on their behalf with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Schrag, 37, a softspoken, nonchalantly rumpled junior professor, had already gained some notoriety by publicly criticizing the controversial FDA approval of the anti-Aβ drug Aduhelm. His own research also contradicted some of Cassava’s claims. He feared volunteers in ongoing Simufilam trials faced risks of side effects with no chance of benefit.
So he applied his technical and medical knowledge to interrogate published images about the drug and its underlying science—for which the attorney paid him $18,000. He identified apparently altered or duplicated images in dozens of journal articles. The attorney reported many of the discoveries in the FDA petition, and Schrag sent all of them to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which had invested tens of millions of dollars in the work. (Cassava denies any misconduct [see sidebar, below].)
But Schrag’s sleuthing drew him into a different episode of possible misconduct, leading to findings that threaten one of the most cited Alzheimer’s studies of this century and numerous related experiments.
The first author of that influential study, published in Nature in 2006, was an ascending neuroscientist: Sylvain Lesné of the University of Minnesota (UMN), Twin Cities. His work underpins a key element of the dominant yet controversial amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s, which holds that Aβ clumps, known as plaques, in brain tissue are a primary cause of the devastating illness, which afflicts tens of millions globally. In what looked like a smoking gun for the theory and a lead to possible therapies, Lesné and his colleagues discovered an Aβ subtype and seemed to prove it caused dementia in rats. If Schrag’s doubts are correct, Lesné’s findings were an elaborate mirage.
Schrag, who had not publicly revealed his role as a whistleblower until this article, avoids the word “fraud” in his critiques of Lesné’s work and the Cassava-related studies and does not claim to have proved misconduct. That would require access to original, complete, unpublished images and in some cases raw numerical data. “I focus on what we can see in the published images, and describe them as red flags, not final conclusions,” he says. “The data should speak for itself.”
A 6-month investigation by Science provided strong support for Schrag’s suspicions and raised questions about Lesné’s research. A leading independent image analyst and several top Alzheimer’s researchers—including George Perry of the University of Texas, San Antonio, and John Forsayeth of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)—reviewed most of Schrag’s findings at Science’s request. They concurred with his overall conclusions, which cast doubt on hundreds of images, including more than 70 in Lesné’s papers. Some look like “shockingly blatant” examples of image tampering, says Donna Wilcock, an Alzheimer’s expert at the University of Kentucky.
The authors “appeared to have composed figures by piecing together parts of photos from different experiments,” says Elisabeth Bik, a molecular biologist and well-known forensic image consultant. “The obtained experimental results might not have been the desired results, and that data might have been changed to … better fit a hypothesis.”
Early this year, Schrag raised his doubts with NIH and journals including Nature; two, including Nature last week, have published expressions of concern about papers by Lesné. Schrag’s work, done independently of Vanderbilt and its medical center, implies millions of federal dollars may have been misspent on the research—and much more on related efforts. Some Alzheimer’s experts now suspect Lesné’s studies have misdirected Alzheimer’s research for 16 years.
“The immediate, obvious damage is wasted NIH funding and wasted thinking in the field because people are using these results as a starting point for their own experiments,” says Stanford University neuroscientist Thomas Südhof, a Nobel laureate and expert on Alzheimer’s and related conditions.
Lesné did not respond to requests for comment. A UMN spokesperson says the university is reviewing complaints about his work.
To Schrag, the two disputed threads of Aβ research raise far-reaching questions about scientific integrity in the struggle to understand and cure Alzheimer’s. Some adherents of the amyloid hypothesis are too uncritical of work that seems to support it, he says. “Even if misconduct is rare, false ideas inserted into key nodes in our body of scientific knowledge can warp our understanding.”
This article goes deeply into the fraud. It’s a great detective story. It raises a whole bunch of tangential issues.
For starters, the fact that you are even hearing about this is because the investigator (Matthew Schrag) didn’t wait for NIH to do anything – particularly after it AWARDED MORE MONEY TO THE FRAUDSTER.
Yes – you got that right.
He [Lesné] became a leader of UMN’s neuroscience graduate program in 2020, and in May 2022, 4 months after Schrag delivered his concerns to NIH, Lesné received a coveted R01 grant from the agency, with up to 5 years of support. The NIH program officer for the grant, Austin Yang—a co-author on the 2006 Nature paper—declined to comment.
Notice how the “revolving door” nature of the science is on display. “Insiders” who are buddies with and coworkers of “outsiders”, give those outsiders the precious grants.
However, Schrag was not caught with his pants down by NIH “Comeyism” (failure to discipline friends). Schrag had also taken his evidence to Science magazine. SMART MOVE. But then, it appears that Schrag was raised by Mennonites, home-schooled, and in the military. Interesting.
More from the Science article:
IN HIS WHISTLEBLOWER REPORT to NIH about Lesné’s research, Schrag made its scope and stakes clear: “[This] dossier is a fraction of the anomalies easily visible on review of the publicly accessible data,” he wrote. The suspect work “not only represents a substantial investment in [NIH] research support, but has been cited … thousands of times and thus has the potential to mislead an entire field of research.”
The agency’s reply, which Schrag shared with Science, noted that complaints deemed credible will go to the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity (ORI) for review. That agency could then instruct grantee universities to investigate prior to a final ORI review, a process that can take years and remains confidential absent an official misconduct finding. To Science, NIH said it takes research misconduct seriously, but otherwise declined to comment.
See how that works? Seriously – you CANNOT trust NIH, any more than you can trust Anthony Fauci.
NOW – things are starting to get interesting as all this news is hitting the mainstream media.
Gil00 brought me a link, in which the most famous coworker of the fraudster, Karen Ashe, finally responded to inquiries. Meanwhile, the fraudster has remained silent publicly. NOTE that in Schrag’s investigation (see below), Ashe was found innocent. ONLY in papers working with Lesné, were any of Ashe’s papers ever found to contain fraudulent images. Ditto for other authors. Lesné was the nexus of the fraud.
BUT the problem WAS spotted long ago, and yet this knowledge never bubbled up to a level of effectiveness in mainstream science. An early French coworker of Lesné found his images suspect, and refused to work with him after that.
From the Science article:
Questions about Lesné’s work are not new. Cell biologist Denis Vivien, a senior scientist at Caen, co-authored five Lesné papers flagged by Schrag or Bik. Vivien defends the validity of those articles, but says he had reason to be wary of Lesné.
Toward the end of Lesné’s time in France, Vivien says they worked together on a paper for Nature Neuroscience involving Aβ. During final revisions, he saw immunostaining images—in which antibodies detect proteins in tissue samples—that Lesné had provided. They looked dubious to Vivien, and he asked other students to replicate the findings. Their efforts failed. Vivien says he confronted Lesné, who denied wrongdoing. Although Vivien lacked “irrefutable proof” of misconduct, he withdrew the paper before publication “to preserve my scientific integrity,” and broke off all contact with Lesné, he says. “We are never safe from a student who would like to deceive us and we must remain vigilant.”
Schrag spot checked papers by Vivien or Ashe without Lesné. He found no anomalies—suggesting Vivien and Ashe were innocent of misconduct.
SO – what does Karen Ashe have to say?
University of Minnesota scientist responds to fraud allegations in Alzheimer’s research
While defending results, U researcher said it is “devastating” that a colleague might have doctored images.
A senior University of Minnesota scientist said it is “devastating” that a colleague might have doctored images to prop up research, but she defended the authenticity of her groundbreaking work on the origins of Alzheimer’s disease.
Dr. Karen Ashe declined to comment about a U investigation into the veracity of studies led by Sylvain Lesné, a neuroscientist she hired and a rising star in the field of Alzheimer’s research. However, she criticized an article in Science magazine that raised concerns this week about Lesné, because she said it confused and exaggerated the effect the U’s work had on downstream drug development to treat Alzheimer’s-related dementia.
“Having worked for decades to understand the cause of Alzheimer disease, so that better treatments can be found for patients, it is devastating to discover that a co-worker may have misled me and the scientific community through the doctoring of images,” Ashe said in an e-mail Friday morning. “It is, however, additionally distressing to find that a major scientific journal has flagrantly misrepresented the implications of my work.”
I’m undecided about this lady. This is a bit of a tangent, but it may be significant.
I trust her to some extent, based on the fact that Schrag found Ashe’s work CLEAN when it was NOT associated with Lesné. In my opinion she’s innocent.
AND YET, Ashe’s background is PERFECT for a two-stepper ChiCom, potentially brought to America as the child of secret socialist sleepers. [NOTE: “Two-steppers” are basically bi-generational spy families, with extreme cover used on the parents to throw off suspicions on the second generation as plants.] Ashe’s background – similar to that of the notorious Vindman twins, is also almost identical to several classic Chinese two-steppers in American media and politics, including relentless Trump character assassin, Weijia Jiang.
Video: Disenguous, pathetic stuff from @CBSNews's @Weijia Jiang, questioning the President's testing motives as suppressing them so as to tamp down case numbers and death tolls and then suggest he's playing politics with reopening state economies while Democratic governors aren't pic.twitter.com/acjiINrXxX
Video: @CBSNews's @Weijia Jiang came back for round two, bashing Trump for talking about testing like it's a "global competition" when so many are dying. Trump replies that she should ask China that question. So the media want Trump to ramp up testing, then hit him when he does?! pic.twitter.com/YYF13b3JrS
And don’t think this is just aimed at Karen Ashe – that I’m just blaming the innocent victim, which she may very well be. Let’s look at Sylvain Lesné. Let’s do a deep dive on the possibility that he was intentionally sabotaging science for more than just personal advancement.
This is just a theory to add to the pile of theories. But it’s a very intriguing theory, with enormous consequences, like – oh, say – “climate change”.
French communists, both agrarian and urban, are THICK in Normandy – where Sylvain Lesné grew up and went to university. The urban centers of Caen, Le Havre, and Rouen are communist strongholds.
You can see that Caen leans even further to the left than “worker’s paradise” Le Havre, where bleak Stalinist architecture rules. The vote against Le Pen was strong in Le Havre, but even stronger in Caen.
There is a reason why communism is persistent in Normandy. Not only is there a regional historical tradition of Jacobin thought – there was aggressive spread of Soviet-style communism to the area by Stalin, both before World War II and afterwards, in the devastation of the Allied liberation.
This was a significant part of the motivation for the Marshall plan – to not let the war feed Stalin’s slow but relentless ambitions, already at work in post-war France.
We already know that French “above-ground” communist Agnès Buzyn, who is weirdly allied with “conservative” Emmanuel Macron, was indicted for a plethora of COVID-19 “mistakes”, in which she seemed to aggressively “do the wrong thing” as COVID-19 began spreading into France.
We here in America are more familiar with one of these aggressive scientific mistakes – the “hiding” of hydroxychloroquine from the public by changing it from OTC to prescription only. (Please note that this “error” was at the bottom of the list, and is not even mentioned around the time of the indictment, which focused more on Buzyn’s downplaying of COVID dangers.)
Now – it’s very instructive to see how the French media (particularly the left-media, but all of it, really) has aggressively covered up for Buzyn on this point, with “fact-checking” in the Snopes style, where there are both clickbait strawmen and evasion on technicalities.
While the FORMAL reclassification of the drug HCQ from OTC to prescription occurred in January of 2020, which would make it seem more vindictive against Didier Raoult, and reactive against the treatment of the disease, that was merely the date of the effective reclassification.
The connection to Didier Raoult is a bit of a red herring, provided largely by his fan base. That is a typical irony useful to disinformation.
It turns out that the reclassification action itself took place in November of 2019. This point is then alleged by the fact-checkers to prove Buzyn’s “innocence”. As we now know, the deepest players in the COVID scam KNOWINGLY took many actions in September, October, and November of 2019.
Thus, in my opinion, these “fact checks” attempting to exonerate Buzyn’s scientific misconduct are in fact even more indicting, and indicative of her premeditated criminality.
Thus, if an analogous theory is correct, that Sylvain Lesné was intending to prop up bad science for more than just his own advancement, then there must be some VALUE in doing so.
Gil00 provided a possible answer to this – in thinking that perhaps there was an immunological connection to the scandal. THAT jumped out at me like a red flag. An immunity connection in Alzheimer’s is not only a known competitor of the beta amyloid theory – it fits in with my recent belief that the entire depopulation plot is connected to and being implemented through a very intentional and surreptitious set of actions leading to a decrease of individual human immunity, to make us EACH more vulnerable.
Thus, Lesné’s actions, which sent the majority of Alzheimer’s research down a primrose path to nowhere, may have been a DIVERSION away from the immunological origins of Alzheimer’s disease.
You know – an origin such as VACCINES.
Yes. Timing is everything.
NOW – even if Ashe and Lesné are completely innocent (and that would include brainwashing by communists), I think this is an EXCELLENT time to look at Alzheimer’s AGAIN, as a potential product of things like viruses and vaccines, which we KNOW can have neurological effects.
Yes. Vaccines which “go wrong” can affect the BRAIN through autoimmune actions.
Just sayin’.
III. Could Global Warming Concern in the Face of an Imminent Mini-Ice Age and an Incipient Full Ice Age Actually be Some Kind of Really Bad Science?
It should now be totally apparent that BAD SCIENCE on a global scale is not just possible – it’s EASY. This is without even bringing in the COVID debacle.
PLANET VULCAN, ANYONE?
You’ve seen it here in part I. BILLIONS of dollars have kept LIES alive and well in pharmaceutical science.
If it pays everybody to tell people there is a chemical imbalance that means they need a drug, it will be done, to sell the drug, or to tell the patient that there is hope. The bad information will be forwarded to doctors, and then to patients, to make those patients feel OK taking the drug. Eventually, it just becomes part of Fake Normal.
Consider (part II) that even a single author on a single scientific paper, followed by a few more images from that author on maybe a few dozen more papers, carrying subtle but convincing false evidence, can send BILLIONS of dollars, maybe tens or hundreds of billions of dollars, down a blind alley.
Not only that – the system will try to keep that money flowing in the same way, even when it is KNOWN by government bureaucrats to be based on faulty data.
Is it impossible that this kind of ERROR could extend to TRILLIONS of dollars?
I mean, who would actually WANT trillions of dollars?
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) were joined by Democratic lawmakers from both the House and Senate on February 7, 2019, to introduce Green New Deal legislation.
There is NOTHING in “anthropogenic global warming” or “climate change”, explained by the current theories, that cannot be explained equally well by the idea that a carbon dioxide prediction boondoggle (remember COVID models?) has occurred, as the result of BAD SCIENCE.
Indeed, the multiple and long-running FAILURES of the climate field would seem to this “poor” scientist to be rather similar to the FAILURES in anti-Alzheimer’s drugs. This kind of failure SHOULD point to severe theoretical problems in any NORMAL science situation, once freed from TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS of bad economic bets by politicians and financiers.
I remember – PERSONALLY – when we scientists were told by the leadership of the American Chemical Society that “anthropogenic global warming” was “settled science”. I knew MANY scientists in all branches of science – who were all SCIENTIFICALLY AFFECTED by this idea – who were still very actively debating the topic – and who like me were not convinced of AGW being real, true, or important, even if it did exist. The entire enterprise seemed HASTY and WRONG.
It seemed TOP-DOWN. It seemed IMPOSED. It seemed to contradict everything we knew about how science was supposed to operate – with major ideas normally taking YEARS if not DECADES of FIGHTING INSIDE SCIENCE to become crystal clear.
And OH YES – we had TIME.
SO – after reading about these two incidents of WRONG science being perpetuated by industry or academia, both knowingly and unknowingly, I do NOT think that “climate change” should be granted a pass.
I think the whole question of climate needs to “go back to the people”. That includes both SCIENTISTS who tell us WHAT IS FOUND, and THE PEOPLE who tell us WHAT MATTERS, once we find the truth.
Everybody else – the money, the media, the “leaders”, the shills, and the malevolent liars – need to get out of the way.
In particular, the MEDIA that pushes scientists’ opinions around with their “fake normal” and “fake science news” needs to STFU.
Don’t “trust the science”.
LET SCIENCE DISTRUST ITSELF.
And maybe, in fact definitely, YOU THE PEOPLE can help US, THE SCIENTISTS to DISTRUST SCIENCE……
Newly Uncovered COVID Vaccine Contracts Lead Unexpectedly to Academic Corruption and Shill Science Attacks on Honest, Skeptical Scientists
A Gail Combs deep dive into a tangent of Karen Kingston’s latest revelation on Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine deaths and injuries, leads back to the war against truth-telling doctors and scientists – this time by their own CORRUPT university employers.
PREFACE by Wolf Moon
Remember people saying that there was no such thing as the “FDA-approved” Comirnaty version of the Pfizer vaccine in existence?
Well, it turns out that REAL, LIVE COMIRNATY is out there, it has already killed over 50 people [in VAERS – yeah – do the math – x20 (1000), x40 (2000), or x100 (5000)], and – now even more shocking – there was some kind of bureaucratic screw-up in the contract and approval process which makes Pfizer LIABLE for all the deaths and injuries.
Look – I don’t know about the latter part – that’s “the law”, which is basically filled with LIES at this point. Whether any of these people will ever answer for anything is highly debatable, in my opinion.
But that’s not where this goes.
Gail Combs started looking at this video, and discovered ANOTHER scandal – the fact that universities which are silencing and firing honest doctors and scientists are not doing so from some misperception or moral high ground. These universities are turning on honest doctors and scientists because the universities themselves are COMPROMISED – by money, corruption, and the involvement of OTHER scientists at those same universities in the “scamdemic”.
We don’t yet know how deep this goes, but we do know this – the universities are clearly in cover-up mode. It’s not just limited to the vaccines. Fauci’s horrifying executioner remdesivir was forwarded past Trump, thanks to “work” done at one such university.
Follow along with Gail and you’ll see the SHAME of what has happened to many American universities, once bastions of free thinking and HONESTY – now CORRUPT and enemies of TRUTH.
-Wolf
START HERE….
FDA Broke Pfizer’s EUA Shield: Liability Protection Gone, Time To Bring Down The Gavel (10 minutes)
Stew Peters interviews former Pfizer employee and analyst Karen Kingston, who does deep dives into patents and contracts. She found the three major contracts for Moderna, J&J and Pfizer.
Stew: “Karen says she found contracts showing the DOD was in control of what data went to the FDA from vaccine trials. If that is true, then DOD not Big Pharm, was the central figure in any vaccine cover-up…. Military leaders maybe exposed as well…. When the FDA approved the Pfizer vax under the name Cormirnaty, it somehow broke their immunity shield.”
That is not exactly correct. DOD delegated it to Pfizer. With the Pfizer contract with the US Army, it appears that, it was delegated to Pfizer to have the ability to manipulate the data that was submitted to the FDA.
With the Moderna contract for example it shows HHS [US Dept of Health & Human Services] had the authority to manipulate the data that was submitted to the FDA. The contract date is 4/03/2020 for ½ billion $$$ with NIH subsidizing a lot of the contract. It was for producing 100 million mRNA vaccines. The contract (shown) states:
* Contractor shall submit draft FDA submission to BARDA at least 15 days prior to FDA submission
* BARDA will provide feedback to Contractor within 10 days of receipts
* The Contractor MUST address, in writing its consideration of all concerns raised by BARDA prior to FDA Submission.
NOTICE THE DATE 4/03/202. No wonder they wanted to kill HCQ in April!
Karen goes on to say that the contract says that BARDA can provide EDITS to the Data and THAT gets submitted to the FDA. She has never seen anything like this before. This [editing] is why the data was so phenomenally positive. This explains why the Whistle Blowers at Ron Johnson’s Formun found the DOD data had been ‘edited’ to remove the tons of adverse events.
She also said a lot of that contract is redacted including the Key personnel at BARDA .
The J&J contract of an mRNA vaccine was signed 08-Apr-2015 and 60 out of the 90 pages are redacted.
She then goes into the most recent contract. It is a joint mission of Dept of Defense and Dept of Health & Human services who contract with Pfizer/BoiNTech “for the co-development and distribution (excluding China) of a potential mRNA-based Coronavirus vaccine aimed at preventing Covid-19 infection“….. LOTS OF REDACTION….
The Research Collaboration & License Agreement by and between PFIZER INC. and BIONTECH RNA PHARMACEUTICALS GmbH [Germany] and BIOTECH AG July 20, 2018
Again the DATE July 20 2018 shows mRNA vaccines for the next outbreak of Covid WAS A DONE DEAL!
@5:00 Karen EXPLAINS the OOPS in the Contract. You can not have a contract for commercialization WITHOUT A FDA APPROVAL DATE!!! So how in Hades did they KNOW there would be FDA APPROVAL? This shows it was PRE-PLANNED IN 2018.
@7:00 She also found the Cormirnaty lots used in the USA and the VAERs data
The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, provides an integrated, systematic approach to the development of the necessary vaccines, drugs, therapies, and diagnostic tools for public health medical emergencies such as chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) accidents, incidents and attacks, pandemic influenza, and emerging infectious diseases.
Together with our industry partners, BARDA promotes the advanced development of medical countermeasures to protect Americans and respond to 21st century health security threats.
A part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIH is the largest biomedical research agency in the world
So there is your Fauci connection.
And that brings me to the digging I have been doing.
I start with the Chair of the COVID VACCINE ADVISORY BOARD, Hana El Sahly, M.D. of Baylor College of Medicine. She is the one who wrote the Remdesivir paper for Fauci, just in the nick of time so he could get that toxin approved for the use in hospitalized elderly Covid patients.
Baylor College rang a major bell with me. This Yahoo News articles shows why:
Dr. Peter McCullough is being sued by the healthcare system that just mandated 40,000 employees to get the jab, and they’re doing it out of spite. Here’s the list of emails to those targeting him, if you wish to let them know how you feel….
Sidebar by Wolf – Dr. McCullough on Stew Peters
I dare anybody to watch this and find anything wrong with anything that Peter McCullough is saying. He is basically admitting – at a time when social media was still removing people for saying as much – that the vaccines seemed to no longer be working. And NOW we know why – because of the delta variant.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a Dallas cardiologist who is largely discredited by the scientific community [Remember Dr McCullough is the MOST PUBLISHED AUTHOR OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN THE USA.] for his assertions that the COVID-19 vaccines are unsafe and that early treatment options have been suppressed….
While McCullough said that doctors were probably afraid to show up to the event, one of Oklahoma’s top infectious disease physicians, Dr. Anuj Malik, director of infection prevention and control at Ascension St. John, said that the doctors he spoke to were not afraid to attend. They were just not interested in sitting through what would be seen as a “politically-motivated, ideological speech by a modern-day quack.”
Malik said. “With all due respect, none of McCullough’s ideas have been supported by any randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials,” [<=== THIS IS ALWAYS THE EXCUSE! NO data is allowed except that PAID FOR BY BIG PHARMA/NIH.]
McCullough shared what he said was a threatening letter from the American Board of Internal Medicine warning that he could lose his certification for spreading misinformation. There is likely a good reason for his concern about losing certification. A Dallas County court granted a temporary restraining order against him in July on behalf of Baylor Scott & White Health for continuing to claim titles, including vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center, even after he was fired from Baylor in February. In addition, an article in Medscape, an online global news source for physicians and healthcare professionals, reported that Texas A&M College of Medicine, Texas Christian University and University of North Texas Health Science Center School of Medicine have also cut ties with McCullough for spreading misinformation….
>
So the Baylor Connection made me curious.
And looky what I found! No wonder Baylor sued Dr McCollough in the hopes of shutting him up as they entice people to be lab rats!
Researchers at the Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit at Baylor College of Medicine have launched a clinical trial to study the safety and efficacy of a booster dose of the Moderna-mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine…. The study is being conducted by the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Consortium in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health…. “It’s important to determine the magnitude of the immune response after a booster dose in persons who received different vaccines in their initial vaccine regimen. We will also be looking at the safety of a booster dose,” said Dr. Robert Atmar, professor of infectious diseases at Baylor and co-principal investigator of the national study.
This activity is supported by the Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Consortium (IDCRC) through the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (UM1AI148684). The IDCRC, consisting of the Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Units (VTEUs) and the IDCRC Leadership Group, was formed in 2019 to support the planning and implementation of infectious diseases clinical research that efficiently addresses the scientific priorities of NIAID. The consortium includes infectious diseases leaders and clinical researchers from Emory University, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, FHI360, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, New York University, Saint Louis University, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of Rochester, University of Washington, and NIAID. For more information about the IDCRC, please visit www.IDCRC.org.
With presentations from members of the NIAID, the Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Consortium (IDCRC) Leadership Group, and VTEU PIs, the inaugural meeting of the IDCRC began with opening remarks from Anthony Fauci, MD, NIAID director. Session topics featured details on working with the NIAID, the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, and grants management. Breakout sessions facilitated thoughtful discuss on the consortium’s scientific agenda, flu, STIs, malaria, enteric, and emerging diseases, mentoring and career development, special populations, emerging lab sciences, and operations.
The IDCRC institutions are leaders of influential infectious diseases, immunology and clinical research programs focused on vaccines and STIs at eight top academic institutions and affiliates across the country. The programs, faculty and collaborators at these institutions have exceptional NIH/NIAID network and international connectivity, a history of performing outstanding ID clinical research and the experience and capability of rapidly responding to ID threats.
Dr. Atmar is a member of the Baylor Vaccine Research Center and the federally funded Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Unit (VTEU). This research group performs Phase I to Phase IV studies of experimental and licensed vaccines, and Dr. Atmar serves as Principal Investigator or Co-Investigator for the clinical trials. Dr. Atmar and the research group have been involved in important studies that led to the licensure of live attenuated and high dose inactivated influenza virus vaccines. They also have performed many studies evaluating vaccines targeting pandemic influenza, including H5N1, H9N2 and H7N9 viruses, and they have evaluated methods to improve vaccine immunogenicity, including delivery of vaccine by different routes of administration, different dosages, and with different adjuvant preparations. The group has also evaluated vaccines targeting other pathogens, including those with importance to biodefense.
Pajon R, Doria-Rose NA, Shen X, Schmidt SD, O’Dell S, McDanal C, Feng W, Tong J, Eaton A, Maglinao M, Tang H, Manning KE, Edara VV, Lai L, Ellis M, Moore KM, Floyd K, Foster SL, Posavad CM, Atmar RL, Lyke KE, Zhou T, Wang L, Zhang Y, Gaudinski MR, Black WP, Gordon I, Guech M, Ledgerwood JE, Misasi JN, Widge A, Sullivan NJ, Roberts PC, Beigel JH, Korber B, Baden LR, El Sahly H, Chalkias S, Zhou H, Feng J, Girard B, Das R, Aunins A, Edwards DK, Suthar MS, Mascola JR, Montefiori DC.
N Engl J Med.
And the Affiliations:
• Moderna, Cambridge, MA. • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Bethesda, MD. • Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. • NIAID, Bethesda, MD. • Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. • Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. • University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. • National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. • Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM. • Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA. …..
Atmar RL, Lyke KE, Deming ME, Jackson LA, Branche AR, El Sahly HM, Rostad CA, Martin JM, Johnston C, Rupp RE, Mulligan MJ, Brady RC, Frenck RW Jr, Bäcker M, Kottkamp AC, Babu TM, Rajakumar K, Edupuganti S, Dobrzynski D, Coler RN, Posavad CM, Archer JI, Crandon S, Nayak SU, Szydlo D, Zemanek JA, Dominguez Islas CP, Brown ER, Suthar MS, McElrath MJ, McDermott AB, O’Connell SE, Montefiori DC, Eaton A, Neuzil KM, Stephens DS, Roberts PC, Beigel JH; DMID 21-0012 Study Group.N Engl J Med.
Affiliation • From the Departments of Medicine and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (R.L.A., H.M.E.S.), and Sealy Institute for Vaccine Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (R.E.R.); the Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore (K.E.L., M.E.D., K.M.N.), and the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (S.C., S.U.N., P.C.R., J.H.B.) and the Vaccine Research Center (A.B.M., S.E.O.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (L.A.J.), the Departments of Medicine (C.J., T.M.B., M.J. McElrath) and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (C.J., C.M.P.), University of Washington, the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division (C.J., C.M.P., C.P.D.I., E.R.B., M.J. McElrath) and the Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention (D.S., J.A.Z.), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and Seattle Children’s Research Institute (R.N.C.) and the Department of Pediatrics (R.N.C.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle; the Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester, Rochester (A.R.B., D.D.), NYU Langone Vaccine Center and Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York (M.J. Mulligan, A.C.K.), and NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island Vaccine Center Research Clinic and the Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola (M.B.) – all in New York; the Departments of Pediatrics (C.A.R.), Microbiology and Immunology (M.S.S.), and Medicine (S.E., D.S.S.), the Center for Childhood Infections and Vaccines (C.A.R.), Hope Clinic of Emory Vaccine Center (S.E.), Emory Vaccine Center, and Yerkes National Primate Research Center (M.S.S.), Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (C.A.R.) – all in Atlanta; the Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (J.M.M., K.R.); Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati (R.C.B., R.W.F.); and FHI 360 (formerly Family Health International) (J.I.A.) and Duke Human Vaccine Institute (D.C.M.) and the Department of Surgery (D.C.M., A.E.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Hana M. El Sahly, MD is principal investigator for Baylor and under her is listed Jennifer A. Whitaker, C. Mary Healy, Christine Akamine, Wendy A Keitel, Robert L Atmar, Annette Nagel, Sandra Francisco, Thea Marie Cordero, Janet Brown, Jennifer Christensen, Caroline Doughty-Skierski, Connie Rangel, Carrie Kibler, Coni Cheesman, Lisreina Toro, Chanei Henry, Chianti Wade Bowers, Pedro Piedra, Kathy Bosworth, Kayla Burrell, Jesus Banay, Tykel Eddy, Trent Davis, Shetel Anassi, Yvette Rugeley, Olga Rybina-Willis …..
So what about the OTHER 15 on the ‘Advisory Board’ I checked, none are in the COVE study group.
Wang EW, Parchem JG, Atmar RL, Clark EH.Open Forum Infect Dis.
2021 Apr 10
Abstract As the first severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines passed UK and US regulatory milestones in late 2020 and early 2021, multiple professional societies offered recommendations to assist pregnant and breastfeeding people as they choose whether to undergo vaccination. Despite such guidance, the lack of data describing vaccine safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy in pregnant and breastfeeding people has made this decision challenging for many. However, even considering the paucity of data, the known risks of coronavirus disease 2019 during pregnancy likely outweigh the not yet fully elucidated risks of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, which have reassuring safety and efficacy profiles among nonpregnant people.
The Chair of the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee is so compromised she should NEVER have been anywhere near the approval process!
-GC
Summary
After viewing the tape of Dr. Peter McCullough on Stew Peters, I’m both shocked and disappointed that Baylor (IMO both the College of Medicine and the allied University) would do anything except DEFEND Dr. McCullough for simply speaking TRUTH when nobody else dared to say it.
At a time when all of social media was defending what now amounts to SCIENTIFIC ERROR, Baylor – a renowned institution – accused a TRUTH-TELLER of “misinformation” for being on the cutting edge.
To borrow from Trump…… “SAD!”
We know now that everything Dr. Peter McCullough said was not only true, but that the science he cited was LEADING EDGE – pointing in the direction of future findings.
It is not “misinformation” to state scientific and medical findings which are both TRUE and in the process of CHANGING narratives. That IS what science is supposed to do.
China won’t have to fire a SHOT to steal academic leadership from the United States, if Baylor – in TEXAS of all places – is going to hand them scientific superiority on a silver platter.
Get the politics and the self-dealing OUT OF YOUR SCIENCE, BAYLOR.
It is a TRAVESTY for you, Baylor, to let your “big money scientists” force out your TRUTH-TELLERS based on POLITICS and motivated by their own SCIENTIFIC MISJUDGMENTS.
*And One Study Showing How Much of a SCAM Fauci’s Beloved Remdesivir Actually Was
The old wisdom of science and medicine, from when I was a kid, has never been disproved. Stated simply:
Disease-conferred immunity in the recovered is always superior to any form of vaccination.
This is why, when we were kids, most scientists and doctors were “unimpressed” by the idea of moving to vaccines for the three main childhood diseases, which diseases themselves provide LIFELONG IMMUNITY against three illnesses that are MUCH ROUGHER on adults.
Why go to a lesser immunity? The diseases are mild in children. The outcomes are excellent. The immunity is SOLID.
Now you can push around the edges of this generality, and find examples where individuals DON’T get good immunity from a “first case” of a disease, and catch it again, whereas some other person gets life-long immunity from a vaccine. Nonetheless, the generality holds at the statistical level, and has always held, because it is LOGICAL.
The whole point of vaccination is to provoke a SUFFICIENT DEFENSE by a LESSER ASSAULT than the disease being prevented.
Thus, for the generality of the old wisdom to be violated, logic, math, and basic biology have to be overturned.
Which is not hard with Democrat minds.
Democrats want to believe things that are politically expedient but simply untrue. I wish I could say the same accusation cannot be leveled against our side, but I can’t. Nevertheless, I find that I can gently correct our side with actual scientific logic, whereas the other side demands “authority”, which they instantly deny to any person or organization that disagrees with them. It’s a solid defense, but it’s not a REAL defense.
In any case, communism is “politics as religion”, and thus it can lead to articles of hope and faith that are held in violation of common sense and widely agreed simple facts – even the most basic science that can be proven at home by anybody.
Thus, the much more solid and honest wisdom of 1960s and 1970s medicine and science began to disappear as the Soviets and Maoists began chipping away at it. By now, it’s in real trouble.
With the COVID hoax, I pretty much thought science was done for. Surprisingly, in the wake of the hoax’s general failure to convince EVERYBODY that up is down and vice versa, we are seeing more and more of the sheepish scientists and doctors who initially went along with things, turning around and disagreeing – although very gently – with the COVID madness.
I would like to show you SIX important points that are now known from scientific studies. You will not see the Bidenistas and Bidenazis trumpeting any of these.
What these points do, is basically show why we don’t need COVID vaccines, nor a particular bad drug called remdesivir.
Indeed, in my opinion, all of these things call into question the entire COVID response, and appear to make it some kind of scam – likely by the World Economic Forum.
I believe that the scam is for global population control, the latter meaning both control of people and control of reproduction.
I’ll explain that at the end, but a bit along the way, too.
PS – thanks to Wheatie for the above image, to RF121 for the link to 4 of these papers, and to Wheatie again for information about the Rockefeller Foundation censoring “misinformation” through Red Jen and Actor Vivek.
Six Points, To The Point
1 – Disease-conferred immunity appears to be 6.72 TIMES as strong as immunity from the COVID vaccines
2 – mRNA vaccines cause spike protein to begin circulating in the bloodstream almost immediately
3 – The antibodies raised by COVID vaccines show pre-existing “memory” immunity to COVID and the vaccines
4 – 99% of those infected by C19 show fast, specific, and effective (“robust”) antibody response
5 – For 2-shot vaccines, shot 1 needlessly elicits memory antibodies, but shot 2 dangerously elicits prompt antibodies
6 – Remdesivir does NOT work against COVID, but it does lengthen time in the hospital
OK, people. Let me break down THOSE items with fuller descriptions.
Six Points, Explained
1 – Disease-conferred immunity appears to be 6.72 TIMES as strong as immunity from the COVID vaccines
Yeah, gotta love those insignificant digits. SEVEN WILL DO – roughly.
This is from an Israeli study that looked at all the people getting infected right now. You will recall that almost all Israelis are vaccinated, yet all of a sudden, people are getting it again – which means that most of them have to be (and in fact WERE) vaccinated.
It turns out that, among the people who are getting COVID in Israel right now, are a few people who had it already – but VERY few of them. If you do the numbers, then it’s clear that catching the disease provides better protection than the vaccine. This is hardly unexpected – like I said – this was old school predictable knowledge back in the 1960s and 1970s.
Stated differently: “Catch a cold one year, you probably won’t catch it again next year, or the year after.”
COMMON. WISDOM.
The number may be a quibble – earlier estimates were actually HIGHER than a factor of 7. So this is a conservative estimate.
But let me repeat what I said. This is exactly what we expect from colds and flu bugs. EXACTLY.
Bottom line, they tried to take something that we already knew, and repackage it as something new and scary. Now, it’s easy to see that this was all about keeping and gaining power over us.
2 – mRNA vaccines cause spike protein to begin circulating in the bloodstream almost immediately
This is actually one of FOUR papers cited in a frontline doctor organizational email, which was then explained in the now-famous video by Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi.
If you have NOT seen this video, you should watch it. If you have seen it, then what you will be reading here (the next 4 points) is what he’s talking about, but related more directly to each of the 4 papers.
The email that describes the 4 papers will be included as an appendix. It describes the significance of the 4 papers, but I am restating that significance in my own terms, here, from my own perspective.
In my opinion, this first point shows exactly why the mRNA vaccines are so problematic, and were never a good idea. Not only is there a ton of vaccine migration PROVEN by the Pfizer leaked documents – there is massive spike protein circulation in the bloodstream. This spike protein activity circulating throughout the body is clearly the cause of all the problems associated with the vaccine.
In my opinion, it’s not a mistake. I believe the manipulated purpose of the vaccines was in fact incremental population reduction by flushing very early pregnancies on a huge but statistically significant scale.
3 – The antibodies raised by COVID vaccines show pre-existing “memory” immunity to COVID and the vaccines
This is a SMOKING GUN. What this means is that all the health authorities LIED to us about a lack of pre-existing immunity. The vaccines are immunizing people to something they are already somewhat or even completely immune to.
Read that again. “Asymptomatic cases” = “basically already almost completely immune”.
Remember early in 2020, when a lone, old, distinguished professor of immunology in Europe dared to publish online a STATEMENT (no way could he get it into a journal) that only pre-existing immunity could explain what we were seeing clinically with COVID-19, and his letter was then censored everywhere?
He is proven COMPLETELY RIGHT in this paper.
Now that we can carefully study new infections with COVID-19, it turns out that people are responding to the disease as “something they’ve seen before”. Yes – it’s THAT similar to the other weak beta coronaviruses.
As many have said, the disease was not actually novel. It was JUST NOVEL ENOUGH. Just novel enough, thanks to gain of function, to win the race for the seasonal best-seller. It’s like a new paperback romance that breaks no new ground as either literature or love-porn, but simply puts tiny tweaks on something everybody has seen before.
Fifty Shades of Nonfluenza.
I repeat. This was a WEAPONIZED COLD – a “new” cold – and THEY KNEW IT.
This was an ECONOMIC ASSAULT on the world. And likely by the World Economic Forum.
Which incidentally sponsored Event 201.
You FUCKERS.
4 – 99% of those infected by C19 show fast, specific, and effective (“robust”) antibody response
The point here was that EVERYBODY who gets COVID-19 – including those who barely have any symptoms or NONE AT ALL – get excellent antibody response – and they SHOW IT. The antibodies may go away, leaving the strong and effective MEMORY antibodies on standby, but the system is soon primed and ready to go.
Which then raises the question – in combination with the prior points…..
Wouldn’t most healthy people just want to get the DISEASE instead of the vaccine? They get better immunity, proven, even if they have ZERO symptoms.
We were SNOOKERED.
This goes back to something that the Fake News media and Fake Medicine CDC hid from us.
When antibody tests first became available, there was an apparent hesitation by authorities (particularly in blue states) to release results. HOWEVER, there were several “blooper” releases of information from hospitals and doctors – at least one of which was forced into disavowing their own prior statement.
What they were finding was double-digit numbers of people who already had antibodies to COVID-19. At that point, the antibody tests were SUPPOSED TO BE unique for COVID-19, and NOT for the prior beta coronaviruses. But yet, they showed antibodies for 30% of people or HIGHER. Later, authorities (including CDC) badmouthed the antibody tests as being flawed because they were picking up antibodies to “other coronaviruses”.
NOW it is completely possible to see what they were trying not to admit. Between prior exposure to both COVID-19 itself and strains of the other 4 weak beta coronaviruses, people were ALREADY IMMUNE.
OLD ANTIBODIES WORKED ON COVID-19.
You see what I’m saying? They would rather falsely “admit” that the tests were “not working”, than to truly admit that the tests worked TOO WELL, and most of us were already immune to COVID-19 to varying degrees. Why? Because that would eliminate the FEAR.
They reframed the PROTECTIVE cross-strain immunity as a test problem, rather than a natural immunity blessing.
It was all about the election. It was all about government control.
It was all a LIE and a HOAX.
5 – For 2-shot vaccines, shot 1 needlessly elicits memory antibodies, but shot 2 dangerously elicits prompt antibodies
This part is actually rather interesting. This is a point that Dr. Bhakdi makes late in his video. The first vaccine shot is NEEDLESS but HARMLESS. Well – more or less. Most people are actually IMMUNE TO THE VACCINE.
Yeah, I want you to read that again.
They can reframe reality – I WILL REFRAME IT BACK.
When you inject somebody with a needless vaccine to which they are already immune, the people simply have an immune response to the assault. Yeah, you can call it a booster, or whatever, but the point is that you have caused the immune memory to replay an old tape and pump out antibodies that work IN GENERAL on your new COVID strain. Vaccine. Whatever.
But the second injection, coming shortly thereafter, is potentially WORSE than NEEDLESS. With two injections, the first kicks up fresh antibodies to spike protein. The second infects YOUR cells and makes them a target of those antibodies.
This is why we saw all those people DIE after their second injection.
THEY. DID. NOT. NEED. THAT. SECOND. INJECTION.
Yeah, this will be a good fight in science – AND the courtroom.
Frankly, I think there need to be lawsuits here, for anybody who would have had a normal contraindication to a second shot, which IMO should have been ALL diabetics, cardiovascular patients, etc. In fact, many of those folks should not have gotten a first shot, because IMO the people that COVID didn’t kill in spring of 2020 were mostly immune, INCLUDING diabetics.
They didn’t need the vaccine. And the vaccine – especially the second shot – killed them.
And hey! If it had been ok to criticize vaccines earlier on social media and not get kicked off, we might have discovered this earlier, and saved a few lives! And dollars!
But no, we live in a fully Orwellian world, where Polish pink diaper that censors people telling the truth about vaccines gets AWARDS for protecting free speech.
6 – Remdesivir does NOT work against COVID, but it does lengthen time in the hospital
This is just “sweet revenge” as Ted Nugent called it. KARMA.
Now I have to admit that I was just as fooled as Trump on this. Fauci – what a scammer.
I saw in the very earliest results that remdesivir was WORSE than not working – it was removing people’s kidneys faster than COVID was. AYE-YI-YI. Bad stuff.
And yet Fauci had the BRASS ASS to go on national television and call remdesivir the “GOLD STANDARD” after that performance. Sheesh! Trust me – Trump saw it, too. This was CLASSIC “you have to show them”.
Admittedly, to some extent, this was “fighting the fear”, and you can see why the POTUS has to take part. But who was generating the fear?
Yeah. Much easier to see the controlling characteristics of the hoax NOW.
Anyway, scientifically, the problem is, there is no point in giving people an antiviral like remdesivir AFTER the virus has already created devastation. You have to deliver the antiviral EARLY – exactly like Dr. Zelenko realized very early on.
Doesn’t matter what KIND of an antiviral – even a piss-poor one, or an atypical one, like hydroxychloroquine, is going to WORK if it gets there EARLY. Late – it simply doesn’t matter.
Now the thing is, remdesivir has to be INJECTED. It could only be used in a HOSPITAL setting – or at least, so they said. I disagreed. People inject stuff in SUBWAYS. Let’s get SMART here.
Well, as a CHUMP HONEST SCIENTIST, my thought was, why not simply administer remdesivir early, by injection, at a lower and safer dose, on an outpatient basis, upon diagnosis? In the doctor’s office, or at a specialist. Nothing worse than a blood draw. Same time that people are being given hydroxychloroquine, or regeneron. It would actually WORK then.
WELL, you see, this paper does more than just prove that remdesivir doesn’t work. I proves WHY they never did the logical thing with it.
Administer it early and effectively, and you don’t SELL AS MUCH. Administer it late and desperately, and you sell a TON of it. And it’s expensive as HELL.
Oh. My. God. I was such a chump. I assumed they would do the right thing if they knew what that was.
The pharmaceutical industry, at this point, is CRAVEN. THEY JUST SELL PRODUCT.
Y’all remember how Fauci bullshitted Trump about remdesivir – how he lied about moving the goal posts? Helps if you know the full story about it, but here’s new evidence that the shit’s actually harmful.
In my opinion, it is now time to call this crap out.
This is one of the most needless vaccines ever – one of the worst outcomes for a vaccine ever – no matter which one – and it is BECAUSE COVID-19 is fundamentally a case where there should not BE a vaccine for most people.
This is a case that was KNOWN not to be very amenable to a vaccine. It was only by a FEAR PSYCHOLOGY OPERATION that we were scammed into accepting the idea that we needed a really badly performing COLD VACCINE.
It’s a MONEYMAKER for industry – their PAWN MOTIVE – and a CONTROL AGENT for various levels of government – their PAWN MOTIVE. Ultimately, it’s about a global effort to gain control – most likely being mediated through the World Economic Forum, since almost all the guilty parties are either “partners” like Google/Alphabet or “organizations” like the Rockefeller Foundation.
And THAT is where we find the really basic motivation for the COVID hoax – as a PLATFORM of human control.
Once I realized that Bill Gates created Windows not as an operating system, but as a PLATFORM to change human behavior into a path he created, I realized the power of creating PLATFORMS. It’s a GOD THING.
You see, the mandatory vaccine platform is basically “The Island” where the entire planet is “The Island”. The people in control are liars, they can inject you with whatever they want, and they then have power of life and death over you, because they lie with impunity.
To start with, I believe the globalist scum are introducing a kind of limited, very incremental contraceptive.
TL;DR – you MUST listen to a short podcast of a scientist revealing the latest research on the spike protein vaccines. The VACCINE ITSELF (not just the spike protein – the mRNA vaccine itself) is persistent and is not only concentrating in ovaries – THE VACCINE ITSELF IS EXCRETED – e.g., in breast milk. Meaning …
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …
Using Principles of Protein Equivalence and Analogy as Predictive Tools for Coronavirus Understanding Surely you’ve heard of the BROWN RECLUSE SPIDER. The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that …
Now – if you followed that patent history work that Dr. David “Bowtie” Martin did on the coronavirus and vaccines, then you realize that they’ve been aware of the spike protein for TWENTY YEARS. Its CONTRACEPTIVE activities had to have been known – likely from before understanding of the spike protein per se, when coronaviruses were just viruses which caused potentially contraceptive symptoms in some patients.
This is a no-brainer, people. We have been manipulated.
W
John Fink and James Coburn discuss case in a scene from the film ‘The Carey Treatment’, 1972. (Photo by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Getty Images)
Appendix: The Letter
Letter to Physicians: Four New Scientific Discoveries Regarding the Safety and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines
SCIENTISTS CONCLUDE THE BENEFIT OF COVID-19 VACCINATION IS “HIGHLY DOUBTFUL” BUT VACCINE INJURY IS “WELL SUBSTANTIATED”
Doctors for Covid Ethics has sent the following letter to tens of thousands of doctors in Europe, summarising four recent scientific findings critical to the COVID-19 vaccination program. The letter explains each finding as it relates to the biology of COVID-19 vaccines, including interactions with the immune system.
Taken together, the letter warns that these new pieces of evidence force all physicians administering COVID-19 vaccines to re-evaluate the merits of COVID-19 vaccination, in the interests of their own ethical standing, and their patients’ safety and health.
A video explanation of the underlying immunology by Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD is here, with German subtitles here.
*
Dear Colleague:
Four recent scientific discoveries are herewith brought to your urgent attention. They alter the entire landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic, and they force us to reassess the merits of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.
Summary
Rapid and efficient memory-type immune responses occur reliably in virtually all unvaccinated individuals who are exposed to SARS-CoV-2. The effectiveness of further boosting the immune response through vaccination is therefore highly doubtful. Vaccination may instead aggravate disease through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
Discovery 1: SARS-CoV-2 spike protein circulates shortly after vaccination
SARS-CoV-2 proteins were measured in longitudinal plasma samples collected from 13 participants who received two doses of Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine [1]. With 11 of the 13, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was detected in the blood within only one day after the first vaccine injection.
Significance. Spike protein molecules were produced within cells that are in contact with the bloodstream—mostly endothelial cells—and released into the circulation. This means that a) the immune system will attack those endothelial cells, and b) the circulating spike protein molecules will activate thrombocytes. Both effects will promote blood clotting. This explains the many clotting-related adverse events—stroke, heart attack, venous thrombosis—that are being reported after vaccination.
Discovery 2: Rapid, memory-type antibody response after vaccination
Several studies have demonstrated that circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA antibodies became detectable within 1-2 weeks after application of mRNA vaccines [1–3].
Significance. Rapid production of IgG and IgA always indicates a secondary, memory-type response that is elicited through re-stimulation of pre-existing immune cells. Primary immune responses to novel antigens take longer to evolve and initially produce IgM antibodies, which is then followed by the isotype switch to IgG and IgA.
A certain amount of IgM was indeed detected alongside IgG and IgA in some studies [1,4]. Importantly, however, IgG rose faster than IgM [4], which confirms that the early IgG response was indeed of the memory type. This memory response indicates pre-existing, cross-reactive immunity due to previous infection with ordinary respiratory human coronavirus strains. The delayed IgM response most likely represents a primary response to novel epitopes which are specific to SARS-CoV-2.
Memory-type responses have also been documented with respect to T-cell-mediated immunity [5–7]. Overall, these findings indicate that our immune system efficiently recognizes SARS-CoV-2 as “known” even on first contact. Severe cases of the disease thus cannot be ascribed to lacking immunity. Instead, severe cases might very well be caused or aggravated by pre-existing immunity through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE, see below).
Serum antibody profiles were reported for 203 individuals following SARS-CoV-2 infection [8]. 202 (>99%) of the participants exhibited SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. With 193 individuals (95%), these antibodies prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection in cell culture and also inhibited binding of the spike protein to the ACE2 receptor. Furthermore, CD8+ T-cell responses specific for SARS-CoV-2 were clear and quantifiable in 95 of 106 (90%) HLA-A2-positive individuals.
Significance. This study confirms the above assertion that the immune response to initial contact with SARS-CoV-2 is of the memory type. In addition, it shows that this reaction occurs with almost all individuals, and particularly also with those who experience no manifest clinical symptoms.
The goal of the vaccination is to stimulate production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, but we now know that such antibodies can and will be rapidly generated by everyone upon the slightest viral challenge, even without vaccination.
Severe lung infections always take many days to develop, which means that if the antibodies generated by the memory response are needed, they will arrive on time. Therefore, vaccination is unlikely to provide significant benefit with respect to the prevention of severe lung infection.
Discovery 4: Rapid increase of spike protein antibodies after the second injection of mRNA vaccines
IgG and IgA antibody titres were monitored before vaccination and after the first and the second injection of mRNA vaccines [3]. Antibody titres rose with some delay after the first injection, then plateaued, but rose again very shortly after the second injection.
Significance. Even though the antibody response to the first injection is of the memory type, the small time lag after the injection may mitigate adverse reactions, because the abundance of spike protein on the cells in the blood vessel walls and in other tissues may have already passed its peak when the antibodies arrive.
The situation changes dramatically with the second injection. Then the spikes are produced and protrude into the bloodstream that is already swarming with both reactive lymphocytes and antibodies. The antibodies will cause the complement system [9,10] and also neutrophil granulocytes to attack the spike protein-bearing cells. The possible consequences of all-out self-attack by the immune system are frightening.
Antibody-dependent enhancement of disease
As described, memory-type immune responses ensure the rapid rise of antibody titres after initial exposure to SARS-CoV-2, rendering the benefit of vaccine-induced antibody response exceedingly doubtful. Regardless, we should not assume that high antibody titres against SARS-CoV-2 will always improve the clinical outcome. With several virus families—in particular with Dengue virus, but also with coronaviruses—antibodies can aggravate rather than mitigate disease. This occurs because certain cells of the immune system take up antibody-tagged microbes and destroy them. If a virus particle to which antibodies have bound is taken up by such a cell, but it then manages to evade destruction, it may instead start to multiply within the cell. Overall, the antibody will then have enhanced the replication of the virus. Clinically, this antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) can cause a hyperinflammatory response (a “cytokine storm”) that will amplify the damage to the lungs, liver and other organs of our body.
Attempts to develop vaccines to the original SARS virus, which is closely related to SARS-CoV-2, repeatedly failed due to ADE. The vaccines did induce antibodies, but when the vaccinated animals were subsequently infected with the virus, they became more ill than the unvaccinated controls (see e.g. [11]). The possibility of ADE was not adequately addressed in the clinical trials on any of the COVID-19 vaccines. It is therefore prudent to avoid the danger of inducing ADE through vaccination and instead rely on proven forms of treatment [12] for dealing with clinically severe COVID-19 disease.
Conclusion
The collective findings discussed above clearly show that the benefits of vaccination are highly doubtful. In contrast, the harm the vaccines do is very well substantiated, with more than 15.000 vaccination-associated deaths now documented in the EU drug adverse events database (EudraVigilance), and over 7.000 more deaths within the UK and the US [13].
ALL PHYSICIANS MUST RECONSIDER THE ETHICAL ISSUES SURROUNDING COVID-19 VACCINATION.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Notes
1. Ogata, A.F. et al. (2021) Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. -:x-x
2. Amanat, F. et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces functionally diverse antibodies to NTD, RBD and S2. Cell -:x-x
3. Wisnewski, A.V. et al. (2021) Human IgG and IgA responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. PLoS One 16:e0249499
4. Qu, J. et al. (2020) Profile of Immunoglobulin G and IgM Antibodies Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin. Infect. Dis. 71:2255-2258
5. Le Bert, N. et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature 584:457-462
6. Grifoni, A. et al. (2020) Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 181:1489-1501.e15
7. Gallais, F. et al. (2021) Intrafamilial Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Cellular Immune Response without Seroconversion. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27:x-x
8. Nielsen, S.S. et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of disease severity. EBioMedicine 68:103410
9. Magro, C.M. et al. (2020) Docked severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 proteins within the cutaneous and subcutaneous microvasculature and their role in the pathogenesis of severe coronavirus disease 2019. Hum. Pathol. 106:106-116
10. Magro, C.M. et al. (2021) Severe COVID-19: A multifaceted viral vasculopathy syndrome. Annals of diagnostic pathology 50:151645
11. Tseng, C. et al. (2012) Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One 7:e35421
12. McCullough, P.A. et al. (2021) Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection. Am. J. Med. 134:16-22
13. Johnson, L. (2021) Official Vaccine Injury and Fatality Data: EU, UK and US.
Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective?
Gloating Pre-Preface
There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought.
Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY OF THE SCAM gets ahead of them. CDC is lying to us so badly. SO badly.
It’s all good, people. I’m on these bastards like BLACK on TAR.
Notice that the governor’s WIFE also tested positive later. But most importantly, notice how the news never asks the RIGHT QUESTIONS connecting the vaccine to the positive test. Instead, we get LIES.
The FAKE NEWS is going along with this crap. They are so deep in this.
Yes, we are now in peak MITHRIDATISM that they wanted to turn into the MIDAS TOUCH of SPIKE PROTEIN.
Such a SCAM.
In my opinion, the CDC should be CLOSED as a CRIME SCENE.
Thank you, Greg. You are a SCIENTIST, and when you felt SYMPTOMS you forced them into coughing up the DATA that reveals how badly they SCAMMED us, and how badly they continue to scam us.
I think Fauci knows exactly what I know. He could tell you EXACTLY why this happened. And once Rand Paul reads this, he’ll know, too. Somebody needs to start cornering Fauci on all this crap.
It ALL goes somewhere.
LOOSE SCIENCE that you know and everybody else doesn’t is a MAGIC ACT. BAD FAUCI!
I’m seeing into the psy-op, people. I’m seeing so deeply.
THE SPIKE MUST FLOW. AND FLOW AND FLOW AND FLOW. It’s the KEY to the SCAM.
Once you see the spike protein CORRECTLY, you see why they do everything they do.
How much you want to bet Bill Gates is wise to this stuff?
Real Preface
I have come to the conclusion that something is very wrong with COVID-19 and the vaccines thereof, and I think I’ve finally put my finger on the scientific macguffin that ties all the skeevy, sketchy stuff together – reverse transcription.
That would be that little red arrow back to DNA from RNA.
It turns out that reverse transcription, and vaccines for diseases that might code for it, are very “Fauci”.
Learn to code. It’s KEY.
Too many things “political, organizational, governmental, and media” have not added up about the phony “plague”. Going beyond that, too much SCIENCE about the “novel coronavirus” and vaccines being offered for them, simply did not add up.
At least, not until now.
It’s not my inner conspiracy theorist which is finding a problem here – it’s my inner scientist. I am having great difficulties rationalizing certain seemingly careless choices which have resulted in some of the most problematic and badly framed medical offerings since “eye of newt” and “really large leeches for anemia“.
I am having a scientific problem with TESTING that is so bad – so intentionally bad – that it borders on the freaking Ouija Board.
And FAUCI KNEW.
It’s all the result of DISHONEST SCIENCE.
Background: “Science Is Real”
I’m not exactly anti-science, having worked in science all my life. I’m not even opposed to “transhumanism”, which I don’t think is inherently and necessarily BAD. The idea of expanding my memory without putting Google or Facebook or anybody else in charge of it? Talk to me. I’m listening.
I’ve ALWAYS gotten the flu vaccine – ALWAYS. I NEVER miss it. That’s not exactly transhumanism, but it shows that, for most of my life, I had great TRUST in medical science. In fact, I would even say I still do. Generally speaking.
I’ve had vaccines for everything I could get – even the RABIES vaccine, when I was bitten by a bat. The rabies vaccine is, in fact, one of the STRONGEST defenses of vaccination in medical history. No vaccine opponent WILL or SHOULD turn down the rabies vaccine – it is a HUGE success story in medicine. If you get bitten by a rabid animal, the rabies vaccine promptly administered against that SLOW virus will SAVE YOUR LIFE. Some vaccines are of arguable worth, but the rabies vaccine is not one of them.
Indeed, I consider myself to be something of a gourmet, or at the very least a connoisseur of vaccines. Previous “reviews” of vaccines on this site have featured my lovely assistant, Miss Direction, néeRetroculture, who helps me convince people that vaccines weren’t always questionable, and might even be good for people.
Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and ANTI-VAX at the same time. I mean, what’s the use of FREE SPEECH if we can’t use it to troll EVERYBODY – including PENCILNECK? Whoops – WRONG PENCILNECK. Let’s try …
Perhaps you recall my PREVIOUS correspondence and “review” of the new, two-shot shingles vaccine, Shingrix – or more specifically, my review of the FIRST SHOT. Wolf’s Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and …
I was anticipating getting one of the new coronavirus vaccines – and was holding out for the first one PROVEN to be safe for recoverees from COVID-19, one of whom I happen to be.
My lungs aren’t that good anymore – not after COVID-19 seared them like some kind of biological chlorine gassing on the front lines in France. I have to be very careful. Another case of COVID, or pulmonary / vascular coronavirus vaccine side effects of comparable severity, might actually “finish me off”.
So – I’m SHOPPING. And I mean SMART SHOPPING. I’ve been paying a LOT of attention to the new vaccines, and trying to understand their technologies, their benefits, their risks, and the science behind them. I simply can’t afford to make a mistake on side effects. Not if I want to enjoy the retirement for which I worked LONG and HARD.
I already knew quite a bit of the science behind COVID and the new vaccines – enough that it has been easy for me to follow the scientific news about these things. I’m not a virologist, an epidemiologist, a vaccine expert, or a molecular biologist, but I’ve worked with such people for much of my life. I picked up a few key ideas in the process. I’ve also come up with a few scientific ideas and principles of my own, but that is largely because I’m a devotee of the history of science, which gives perspective on science.
If you don’t think science can be WRONG, and that large numbers – HERDS – of scientists therein, can go OVER A CLIFF, just take a look at Planet Vulcan, Lysenkoism, The Great Leap Forward, and science in the Third Reich – a seminar on the latter having been quite instructive in my youth. It was not simple how the scientific masses in Germany were led astray, once socialist politics DRAGGED, PUSHED, and SCARED them away from “Jewish Science”. The top echelons of German science, filled with Jews and their friends and spouses, were forced into horrible choices, as some of the best science and scientists were politically rejected over a real social stupidity which fractured and destroyed what was arguably the leading scientific nation on the planet.
None of that had to happen – but it did.
Don’t think we’re immune from scientific debacle. We’re not. Socialism is the greatest “hold my beer” knucklehead that science ever green-lighted into a dysfunctional relationship. He’s always coming back on Saturday night with roses and cherry vodka, after the “last” last time he wrecked Science’s cute little sports car.
Science normally checks itself for errors – and it is my contention that the checking needs to be extensive – all the way out to society as a whole – including stakeholder scientists, non-stakeholder scientists, and even the non-scientific public at large. Sure, you can skip the non-stakeholders and the public, but is it wise? Hardly, in my opinion. The smaller the group needing to be fooled, the easier it is to accomplish things which society simply does not want, or which have vast intended or unintended consequences.
Yuri Geller proved that scientists are easy to fool. James Randi made that point even more strongly. And I have my own take on it, which adds pushy and manipulative politics of any kind as a RISK to science. The same “sale by urgency” which works for salesmen at the appliance store, works in science. Many of us – particularly those of us with historical perspective – saw this problem in climate science. Now, we see it in COVID and vaccines. We are being rushed into something, for some reason. The questions are WHAT and WHY.
I’m going to assume that most people reading this, have started to grasp enough of the basics of viruses and vaccines, and particularly the new mRNA and DNA vaccines, that they don’t need “the way things are supposed to work” explained to them. Indeed, if you go out, and absorb all the “mainstream” journalism on COVID – science sites – mainstream media – cable networks – your favorite non-conspiratorial “science guys” – fact checkers – explaining the way things are SUPPOSED TO WORK, you will be thoroughly and smartly educated by excellent science.
If you want, try this great link courtesy of Ethical Skeptic, one of my favorite “dissident scientists” out there, pulling us back from the current “woke Lysenkoism” we seem to be in.
Good summary of the unique structure of the Spike Protein mRNA vaccine and how it differs from the Coronavirus' Spike Protein RNA in pseudouridylyl Ψ and synonymous codon stealth.
See? Yeah, I’m a grade-A conspiracy theorist, because I told you to look at Snopes, and not some clickbait site saying these vaccines are injecting nanobots into you to turn you into something non-human.
The PROBLEM with the conspiracy theories on vaccination isn’t so much DIRECTION as it is MAGNITUDE. It’s all over-reach. Silly, perhaps well-intended, but self-discrediting overreach. Much of it is clickbait or psy-op. A lot of it is actually true – at some small level – often orders of magnitude less dramatic than the headline claims. I can talk to the consumers of such in terms they will understand, and I’m generally talking them DOWN and BACK to what are more scientifically grounded problems with the new vaccines. And there are some. Which is the POINT of this entire piece.
In this essay, I am now talking primarily to what might be called “vaccination normies”, who are – like me – normally rather trusting of vaccines, but perhaps feel like there’s something not quite right about the current situation. These are people who have SOME vaccine hesitancy, but are likewise leery of TRULY baseless skepticism of science.
I’m talking about the people who put “SCIENCE IS REAL” yard signs out in front of their houses. There is a side of me that likes that. However, there is a side of me that wants to put out a sign that drops LOVE IS LOVE (Pedo? No way!) and all the rest, and sticks to what I know about science from the inside:
SCIENCE IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC FRAUD IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC GREED IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC BIAS IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC ERROR IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC DECEPTION IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC SELF-DECEPTION IS REAL
SCIENCE IS REALLY MESSED UP
SCIENCE IS STILL BEAUTIFUL
You see what I’m sayin’? You want SCIENCE, you get the whole, lovely, crazy, smart, dumb, dysfunctional bimbo who thinks she can handle SOCIALISM, and ends up on some frat party lawn in a lab coat and a mini-skirt, throwing her shoes at strangers, demanding somebody take her home, and SHE’S NOT DRUNK.
Yeah. I knew that crazy, wonderful bitch.
Wolf’s Take on Coronavirus Vaccines
You can check out my posting history here to follow the chronology of my thinking on coronavirus vaccines, but I’ll try to recap toward my current thinking, and what seems to be wrong with them. I am going to lead you up to my last post on the vaccines, where I almost saw what I’m seeing now, plus a whole bunch of other stuff.
PREFACE I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT. The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – …
The first news that really grabbed me was about Inovio – a DNA vaccine – a “Bill Gates” vaccine (almost all are, TBH) – and thus one of what I will refer to as genetic vaccines. Such vaccines are not supposed to work by modifying one’s genes or genome, despite the word genetic. They simply exploit cellular biochemical processes CLOSER to the genes, using the known biology of genetic expression. They dump DNA or messenger RNA (or a close facsimile thereof, to be more precise) into existing cellular processes, to “fool” the processes into creating – in the case of the current coronavirus vaccines – a stabilized form of the spike protein of the virus.
At the time, I noticed that these would be THE FIRST genetic vaccines being tested in or deployed successfully in humans. And this is where things get “iffy”. Just a little bit.
The next vaccine to get into the news in a big way was Moderna – an mRNA vaccine, again using a full and slightly stabilized spike protein as the antigen, but created in vivo via the mRNA genetic instructions thereof. While Moderna seemed to be successful in its first clinical trials, the side effects were noteworthy, frequent, and fairly significant – even compared to the notoriously “spicy”, arm-reddening-and-bicep-swelling, shingles vaccine, Shingrix. As one respected “pro-vax” scientist of my old acquaintance put it, they would have to kill him to give him the Moderna vaccine. He was definitely thinking the same thing I was thinking. Rush job, problems, keep looking.
My initial hopes quickly moved toward Novavax. Novavax is NOT an mRNA or DNA vaccine. It uses the same full stabilized spike protein strategy as the others, but it provides the spike protein AS spike protein, using a nifty little nanochemical “pincushion” to hold the spikes in an outwardly facing array, thus to engage receptors properly and at LOW DOSAGE. This is an excellent strategy that AVOIDS the unknowns of mRNA vaccines like Moderna, or DNA vaccines like Inovio or Russia’s Sputnik V.
The most significant risks of spike protein vaccines like Novavax are the risks of the spike protein itself, NOT of abusing the genetic processes to CREATE the spike protein in vivo, like Moderna. Indeed, Moderna scientists admitted in one of their first papers on their vaccine, that there ARE unknown potentials for long-term side effects with mRNA vaccines. Go find the paper – it’s there. They couch the admission in gentle and somewhat obscuring language, but the disclaimer is there. It has to be. They’re being honest.
mRNA vaccines in animals have not been uniformly free of side effects, to put it VERY kindly. We can argue about the severity of those side effects, and whether they extrapolate to humans, but I suppose we will find out now. The risks are there, and they tend to be long-term. So – in full disclosure – there are RISKS to mRNA vaccines. The older you are, the less the long-term risks matter, and conveniently, the higher the risks of COVID-19 itself. That’s a good thing. It means we only have to take the risks with those patients who can most likely afford them.
On the flip side, why the hell we want to take huge, unnecessary risks to vaccinate children is beyond me, but I’ll save those arguments for another essay. Or look at my LAST essay. Those arguments are, in part, subtle “history of vaccination” propositions that would bog us down right now.
In contrast, Novavax doesn’t take those risks. It’s a more conservative vaccine. This is why it jumped to the top of my list. An entire class of risks – the genetic processing ones – were automatically removed. As a “nothing can go wrong or I’m likely DEAD” vaccine recipient, I appreciated my better chances with Novavax.
BUT as a “real” scientist, I am not just swayed by THEORY – I love the results of EXPERIMENT. Thus, when Pfizer’s clinical trial results came out, I was IMPRESSED by the excellent antibody levels and the almost minimal side-effects. Far from being an arm-burner like Moderna, Pfizer was looking to be much milder on short-term side-effects, with stronger adverse effects being downright RARE. The large population of test subjects also implied that a recoveree LIKE ME was likely in the study by accident – and NO deaths or severe reactions occurred – definitely a GOOD SIGN for my case.
This not only bode well for lower likelihood of some kind of lethal short-term reaction due to my recoveree status – the smart scientific position would be that lower short-term risk very likely reflects lower long-term risk – and this supposition is completely absent ANY “knowing” causative reason to connect them.
Thus, Novavax and Pfizer were at the top of my list. Things were looking GOOD to take a vaccine, even if I didn’t get an explicit study on safety in recoverees.
And THEN reality started to hit.
Yes – when millions of doses of a vaccine go out, there are going to be deaths and injuries. We have a system in place – let’s be honest – which tries to HIDE the minority reports on vaccine adverse events, in order to keep buy-in on vaccine compliance. That doesn’t mean people should stop getting vaccines, any more than reports on horrible vehicle accidents OR the “hiding” of such accidents on the back pages of newspapers, mean that we should stop driving.
Nevertheless, my scientific curiosity was piqued. We DO have COVID vaccine problems now, and MORE than seemed to have been revealed by the vaccine trials.
WHY NOT DO SOMETHING ABOUT THEM?
I repeat. Differently. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH BETTER VACCINES.
Taking stock of the many positives and negatives associated with THREE VACCINES which gained the most initial experience – Moderna, Pfizer, and Oxford/AstraZeneca – I noted three things, one from each.
Moderna – side effects sometimes REMARKABLY resembled COVID-19 itself – even up to SEVERITY.
Pfizer – nursing home patients were testing positive AFTER vaccination – some dying of COVID symptoms
AstraZeneca – hematological problems reminded me of another protein hemotoxin – snake venoms
I could go into deep details about these observations, but in TWO of the cases, it was VIDEOS where the “light-bulb” finally went on. So let’s look at some videos.
Moderna: Ben Stein’s vaccination experience
As I was listening to Ben, I was stunned. He was describing COVID-19 – at least from my perspective. This was not coincidence – this was SPIKE PROTEIN.
WHOA, NELLY!!!
Note that Ben is still “pro-vax” here – he’s just CAUTIONING people about REALITY.
Pfizer: Nursing Home CNA describes correlation of vaccination to later positive diagnosis and death
This man, a CNA in a nursing home, reported online what he had observed, amidst great personal anguish about “whistle-blowing”. He observed that he had protected his elderly patients for all of 2020, but when they finally got the Pfizer vaccine, many of them just started “testing positive” and DYING. He was NOT buying the management line that there was a super-spreader – if you listen to him, he’s fully contemptuous of the idea. He was CERTAIN it was the vaccine.
I agreed with this guy – a TRUSTED SCIENTIFIC REPORTER, in my opinion. His GUT was telling him that the chronology was one of correlation. He was very likely seeing in his mind a pattern in a delay over TIME, integrated over cases, that could only be explained by the vaccine itself. He was NOT accepting the management excuse of a “super-spreader” fortuitously infecting the vaccinated, to give that same result. THIS GUY is my kind of scientist. SKEPTICAL of ad hoc, contrived, politically correct explanations that don’t explain all the facts and observations in a clean, natural fashion.
AstraZeneca: Rare but serious clotting reactions are enough to evoke CONCERN from medical professionals
I think THESE DOCTORS in the following video represent my position extremely well – the problems with the AstraZeneca vaccine are RARE, but we KNOW there is a correlation, and it is our DUTY to stop and fix the problems, weighing in particular the relatively lower risks of COVID-19 itself in younger patients, where these events are occurring.
The difference between IGNORING the rare thrombocytopenia incidences and FIGURING THEM OUT is the difference between Stalinism and responsible popular government.
I truly admire these front line doctors for their SCIENTIFIC BALANCE. Frankly, I consider front line doctors to be scientists of the highest order, just like that CNA in the video above. PRACTICE is what matters – not DEGREES.
Now in this latter case, the AstraZeneca vaccine, I dragged in what I consider a very useful analogy to hemotoxic snake venoms, but I didn’t really see WHY this would be happening – until I found something that explains ALL of these problems.
I just didn’t realize I was holding an ACE.
The Macguffin – Reverse Transcription
In March of 2021, I reacquainted myself with a paper that I had noted when it came out, in December of 2020, but had not fully grasped the significance. The authors clearly knew that what they had found was a big deal, and worded the title appropriately, but even then, I don’t think they dared consider the possible deeper significance of their finding.
Nobody can FIRE ME from retirement, so I’m quite willing to say what needs to be said. Could it be wrong? Maybe. But if it’s RIGHT, there are issues that need to be dealt with. So let’s go there.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
Liguo Zhang, Alexsia Richards, Andrew Khalil, Emile Wogram, Haiting Ma, Richard A. Young, Rudolf Jaenisch doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516
I will refer to this paper at “the Jaenisch paper” – after the main author to whom correspondence is written – not because I don’t want to credit the fortunate and likely excellent first co-author Zhang in this instance, but because there is another paper I talk about all the time, dealing with masks, that I call “the Zhang paper“.
THAT one – the mask paper – in an embarrassingly good journal – is a piece of crap – some of the worst “political science” ever – designed to virtue signal to the CCP-DNC narrative of election-fraud-assisting masks, in utter contradiction to the very data presented by the authors.
The Jaenisch paper, in contrast, opens up a barn door that I am sure both industry and “in bed” government wants closed, Closed, CLOSED.
Stated very bluntly, the paper says that the virus behind COVID-19 actually “changes the genome” of victims – similarly to, though not exactly like, HIV.
You know – that OTHER disease for which Fauci was so interested in creating a vaccine.
And not only that – the COVID-19 virus does it enough to throw off those damn PCR tests that Kary Mullis warned us about for the exact same reason. In fact, the solution of that aspect of testing – the way “test-triggering fragments” just hung on and on and on in recoverees – is one of the BEAUTIES of the Jaenisch paper. The conclusions of the paper explain very neatly certain OBSERVATIONS and scientific conundrums that were first found by Korean scientists, who were very very persistent in proving that their COVID patients were NOT getting reinfected, as the fear-mongering American media “wanted”, but were still testing POSITIVE while being NON-INFECTIOUS.
Now we have a wonderful explanation. Excellent scientific work. THIS is why I signed up for science!
The THREE-TRILLION DOLLAR QUESTION that nobody wants to ask, however, is whether the genetic vaccines based on mRNA or DNA of the viral spike protein do the same thing – meaning get incorporated into the genomes of recipients. Well, do they?
Ever? Sometimes? Always? Or even just enough to make a difference?
It’s a great question! That deserves a CLOSE LOOK with MUCH SIDE-EYE.
I will say this. Even if these vaccines only get incorporated sometimes, that would make the “crazy people” yelling “OMG THESE CORONAVIRUS VACCINES ARE GENETIC MODIFICATION!” become suddenly – oddly – scandalously – CORRECT.
I find that incredibly ironic.
BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR. And then, there is EVEN MOAR STILL.
The Spike Must Flow
I had set the Jaenish paper aside in my mind in January 2021, as I was busy being pursued by the FBI as an “insurrectionist”, having wanted to see “fellow dissident scientist” Dr. Simone Gold speak at the Capitol Building on January 6, 2021. Rather luckily, I never found her, or realized where she was. Had I found her, I would have likely been arrested and all that nonsense, since she wandered, far too trustingly, into the interior of the Capitol building.
This old wolf, too wary to go into buildings – too old to play tug-of-war games – too injured to stand up to direct pepper spray – settled for singing the Star Spangled Banner at over 100 decibels with tens of thousands of patriots outside – which was an absolutely surreal experience.
But back to the story.
When I began seeing more and more vaccine problems by March of 2021, some of the possible answers seemed to point to the WHOLE SPIKE PROTEIN being the BAD ACTOR. The trouble was, I needed disease-producing levels of it. How might THAT be happening?
Look at Ben Stein. He was injected with only a small amount of COVID spike protein mRNA, but had disease like I did, when, in my case, the virus ran wild making BOTH spike protein AND more virus from it, in my cells.
The vaccine does NOT create any new virus. It does NOT have the full virus instructions. JUST the main one – the spike protein that provides a significant part of the viral shell.
Thus, the vaccine cannot create an EXPONENTIAL GROWTH of the spike protein, which the VIRUS does. The full virus creates more and more virus, meaning more and more spike protein, until something – immune response – shuts it all down.
The vaccine creates a few “fountains” of spike protein – basically “vaccine-infected” cells – but these get shut down as immunity builds. It never really gets out of control. Or at least, not normally.
So, for Ben Stein to have a powerful, disease-like experience, he needs cells that are cranking out far more spike protein than we would normally expect with the vaccine.
Well, if the INSTRUCTIONS for spike protein – in some people – got a bit upstream of just “slipping them into the print shop queue”, to where entire new print queues of spike protein and substantial, chimeric, problematic chunks thereof were being repeatedly ordered from DNA central operations, it would explain a whole lotta spike protein and associated chimeric junk being produced – more than anticipated.
And – I think I would be remiss if I didn’t consider the possibility that some of these bogus DNA instructions might be hard to shut down completely, thus providing an explanation of “long haulers” and “immunocompromised variant generators” beyond their known suffering of what can be rightly regarded as “simply” chronic damage from initial infection.
But let’s move on the to Pfizer nursing home case, and many other reported cases like it.
If we’re getting genetic incorporation of vaccine spike protein instructions at the DNA level by reverse transcription, like the Jaenish paper, perhaps in older individuals who are more susceptible to this problem, then it explains them testing positive later – and in some cases – if they can’t shut it off – DYING LATER.
Now – here is where KINETICS comes in. Kinetics is basically process flow rates. I talked about KINETICS in my LAST RANT on COVID-19, in which I began to put all this stuff together, but didn’t really put forth the totality of things until the comments section at the end of the post. I mentioned in the body of the post that the kinetics of viral interference didn’t seem to explain the nearly complete disappearance of flu while COVID was still significantly above herd immunity levels. It just felt to me that BOTH of these would shut down with greater similarity, if viral interference was the sole explanation. In that case, CDC lying to us about flu vaccine efficacy, understating the success to increase compliance, COMBINED with viral interference, provides a nicer (IMO) explanation of the observed kinetics.
Now, in the case of partial genetic incorporation, the kinetics of interest would be how fast the body shuts down spike protein production by cells without genetic incorporation, versus shutting down cells where there WAS genetic incorporation. If cells with significant production of spike protein due to genetic incorporation were not just sources of more spike protein and more symptoms, but also harder to shut down than “unincorporated” cells, and elderly people were increasingly subject to genetic incorporation with age, we might actually see the AGE-VACCINE DANGER relationship that is being seen in nursing homes, where the most elderly patients are at significantly greater and AGE-INCREASING risk from the mRNA vaccines – something we absolutely don’t want.
Are you starting to see why this explanation works for me?
Genetic incorporation of symptom-producing protein instructions by mRNA vaccines of the FULL SPIKE PROTEIN seems like a REAL WORKHORSE OF AN EXPLANATION.
And, if you’re following my reasoning, you can see that this can also explain the odd cases of thrombocytopenia in some younger patients getting the AstraZeneca vaccine.
In the AstraZeneca case, we would be seeing rare cases where spike protein production after genetic incorporation was just cranking away at levels reminiscent of hemotoxic envenomation by crotalids – or in English, snakebite, which is also (in certain snakes with certain proteins) characterized by thrombocytopenia.
I will tell you right now – there MAY be very similar cases in older patients – maybe not – but I suspect that such cases are less “systemically identifiable” in older patients where thrombosis is more “normal”, and will be more likely attributed to age and NOT the vaccine.
And here is the kicker. In all of these cases, because of the chimeric nature of the fragments noted in the Jaenisch paper, there is a certain RANDOMNESS which could be responsible for the random responses seen in different individuals and different vaccines, which by using significantly different mRNA vectors, may result in significantly different levels and exact circumstances of genetic incorporation in different individuals.
NOW – if it turns out that there IS genetic incorporation of vaccine-origin stabilized spike protein mRNA or DNA as genomic DNA, like the virus itself, then one of the first suspects for reverse transcriptase activity or induction thereof, would be the spike protein itself.
And THAT, my friends, opens up a REAL can of worms.
The Full Spike Protein Monty
Let me ask a really impertinent but really obvious question – something that Tucker Carlson is famous for.
Why are we vaccinating people with the WHOLE spike protein, or more precisely, stabilized analogs thereof?
OK – now I’m being a LAWYER here. I am asking questions to which I ALREADY know the answers, and in particular, the answers that Tony Fauci might give. Here is my argument on behalf of Fauci.
“We don’t really know EXACTLY where on the spike protein, might be the BEST place for antibodies to attack. Also, we don’t really have time to start guessing, when we can just use the whole thing. Most of the labs are modelling the whole molecule, and sharing data. It just makes sense that everybody sticks to the same model, so that any advances that one lab makes, can be quickly adopted by the other labs and researchers. If we begin using fragments of the spike protein, then results are going to be harder to interpret from lab to lab. There will be fragmentation of the science as well, and this will slow our response time tremendously. Comparison of results will be much more difficult. The timeline to a vaccine could be extended by months – even years. Maybe never……..”
See how that works? I would make a fantastic lying science bureaucrat – I know all the tricks already, because I used to negotiate compromises that result in the status quo in fake science in other ways.
Now – HERE is the superior counterargument that will LOSE because Tony Fauci is in control. For this argument, I’m a FRONT-LINE DOCTOR. Maybe I’m even Simone Gold, or one of the various doctors I followed back during the HCQ Wars.
“Yes, that’s all fine and good. But we are doctors, administering a VACCINE to patients. Adverse effects are real, and we want to minimize them. The spike protein is almost certainly the cause of much of the endothelial damage by this virus. Anything we can do to avert that damage is smart, including NOT using the full spike protein or analogs thereof. If we know the primary sites that antibodies need to attack, which we actually do, we can just use shorter peptide sequences or protein fragments constituting those sites. Modeling can make sure these fragments present the same, active, pre-fusion conformation. We can stabilize as needed to prevent immune enhancement, just like in the full spike protein. This shorter peptide approach has been successful in hepatitis vaccines. These peptides can be created quickly and formulated as vaccines in roughly the same time as the full protein. In fact, vaccine expert Winfried Stoecker has already done this, using the receptor binding domain of the spike protein, and creating a short peptide based on it. Since this technology is well-known, we don’t have to take any of the risks of messenger RNA or DNA technology. Nor do we have to use adenoviral vectors or new lipid nanodroplet technologies. Likewise, all of the advances in stabilizing pre-fusion conformation in the full spike protein can be used for the RBD peptide, so the risks of immune enhancement will be just as low. So, unless you can give us a reason to stick with the toxic spike protein, I’d say this is a no brainer.”
At least, that’s the way it looks to me.
Now, here are some interesting facts.
First, EVERYBODY is doing the full spike protein. The ONLY party that made a vaccine using less, was Prof. Stoecker, and he got in trouble for it, with the German government, because he wasn’t properly authorized, even though – well – normally he just does vaccine work and that’s that.
Second, you should note that – IF the spike protein has any reverse transcriptase (RT) activity, that activity would likely have been LOST by switching to a small peptide dropping most of the molecule.
Third, you should note that – by switching to a small peptide, there is no mRNA or DNA corresponding TO that peptide, so there is no chance it will be genetically incorporated.
By now, it is VERY clear to me, that the industry picked the vaccine technologies that it did, precisely because they were modern and untested, and they needed an “emergency” to get these technologies into use, in preparation for their big goal – actual gene therapy. But – AND LOGIC here – that does not preclude there being even MORE motivation here. The more I see this “event”, the more I see everybody getting bought in by SOME new aspect of the scam.
Using a more conservative approach would have been SAFER, but it would not have advanced the technologies that were groomed to be advanced. Even the Novavax protein-based vaccine, fairly conservative, tests the novel use of nanoparticles to assemble the pseudo-spike proteins into cell-infective starburst patterns. It, too, is full spike protein.
But again, THIS. Everybody is ALL about the full spike protein.
Let’s ask WHY.
A Feature – Not a Bug
Now – if the Jaenisch work is good – and I think it is – and if genetic incorporation of vaccine mRNA into genomic DNA also occurs – and I strongly suspect it does – and if the spike protein itself is responsible to at least SOME degree in causing genetic incorporation – which I also think is very likely – then I am of the opinion that Fauci knew exactly what he was doing in pushing mRNA and DNA vaccines that code for the full spike protein, and that he did so as a sneaky way to get a reverse transcription promoter into the human genome.
Why? I don’t really know. Not yet. But this whole thing just seems intentional in its ELEGANCE.
This is easily expressed in logical hacking terms. Fauci uploaded a stealthy FTP uploading tool into humanity’s genetic account. FIRST as a problem, with China’s help. THAN as a solution, with the industry’s help.
The idea of “uploading an uploader surreptitiously” is just elegant. It’s HACKING. Any person who ever had to “learn to code” has to admire it. And it’s doubly elegant by doing it TWICE.
Stated in biological terms:
Create a genetic vaccine for a same-same disease, both containing the genetic sequence of a reverse-transcription promoter, such as a reverse transcriptase, as a way of creating a persistent or at least consistently available presence of a reverse transcription activator in humans.
And the beauty of this scam, is that it’s “WHOOPS” played TWICE. VIRUS, then VACCINE.
Let’s enjoy it! Scenic route…….
FIRST the disease – OH, NO, LOOK WHAT BAT SOUP DID!
The ChiComs are masters of psychology on Americans. First they whip up the cultural WTF.
THEN they whip up the OTHER side of Americans saying “don’t hate on Asian cultural differences!”
THEN they pull the whole offering back, with everybody left high and dry on CCP zoonotic transfer garbage narratives, minus “bat soup”, but including pangolin “look squirrels”, when the REALITY is that humanized animal models are almost all that is actually used for this kind of viral research any more (thanks to Mary Morse for this fantastic point).
Wuhan lab. Put ALL your chips on it.
MASTERFUL MANIPULATION, and many American academic scientists fell for it like soldiers on leave in a brothel district.
THEN the cure – the vaccine – which uses the SAME genetics to get MOAR of the uploader installed in MOAR people.
And if they get caught….”OMG, DID WE DO THAT? WE JUST FOLLOWED THE SCIENCE AND THE DISEASE! FULL SPIKE PROTEIN FOR THE WIN! IT’S *** SCIENCE *** !!!”
Introduction You have GOT to see the video I’m going to show you. It’s not just what they’re talking about. It’s WHERE IT LEADS. Most of the people who watch Rand Paul go after Fauci here, are concentrating on MASKS, because that is the TOP LAYER of the argument. But THAT is the small potatoes. …
Something is going on here, and it seems too purposeful to be mere incompetence.
SO – Does Wolf Take the Faucipox Vaccine?
Now – I’m gonna tell you – CRISPR-Cas9 vaccines are coming, and THOSE are straight-up genetic engineering. Save some ammunition for that fight. But right now, I think it’s worth bringing up some PRETTY TOUGH QUESTIONS about the current vaccines.
Simply stated – aren’t things with reverse transcription activity a RISK, like HIV, and why would we court that risk in a SOLUTION like a vaccine?
And what’s with all the LIES to keep people from noticing that the VACCINE causes positive tests in recipients, “because spike protein, sequences, PCR, and [COUGH] maybe a little incorporation”.
C’mon. This is so obvious now, it’s PAINFUL. CDC is not even looking foolish. They know this stuff isn’t the disease – it’s the vaccines. They’re LYING.
Sheesh. The whole thing is an outrage.
So. Am I going to take one of the current vaccines?
Not if I think there is a reverse transcription activator coded for in the mRNA or DNA, or even if it’s just in there as PROTEIN.
I’m quite good with my natural immunity, which sadly may ALREADY include some uploading of the uploader. I have no idea if I have any genetic incorporation from the virus already, but if I do, I know exactly where any future positive PCR test is coming from.
Anyway, thank you, Kary. You were right all along. They ABUSED your work.
I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT.
The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – somewhat in honor of the Branch Davidians who were SET UP and MURDERED by the globalist scum, it’s time for some JUSTICE.
I look at the people of this blog – many of whom HAD COVID-19 or whatever – being forced by socialist idiocy to take a vaccine that seems to show the most side effects in those who had the virus, and I am ENRAGED.
WHY? Where has science gone? Who will stand against this insanity?
The PEOPLE of America, LEERY OF THE LIARS, need to STAND against being subjects of the world’s greatest socialist medical experiment since Mengele and Auschwitz. The CHINAZI SCUM and their GLOBAL PUNK ALLIES who created this convenient misfortune – who seared my lungs to take my freedom – will not get away with this. It’s time to FIGHT BACK HARD.
LIKE TRUMP.
This is a long post that will, like vaccine side effects, expectedly yet unexpectedly rock a lot of people’s little worlds, so buckle up.
We take out something rather large in the intro, to “train the guns”, and then move on to Bio-9/11.
INTRO
The name Branch Covidians just suggests itself for the madness of turning a secondary sub-flu into a phony super-plague, but the truth is, the PLOT to pull off this MIND-FRACK was neither mad nor stupid, and goes much, much deeper than the abusable psychology of the people who were predictably ginned up as Mask Karens and Vaccine Custody Kens.
An example of why a chapter in the book is titled “The Branch Covidian Cult” https://t.co/OX9X4R0eZy
The roots of what was intended to be the first biological endless war, lie in the previous kinds of endless war. So let’s start there, with the endless war on guns.
If you know how Hillary Clinton was researching the apocalyptic Branch Davidian sect before the Clintons even got into the WH, then you will have a leg up on what I’m doing here and why I’m doing it. However, to nip this stuff in the bud, we will use PEACE, not VIOLENCE.
Observe.
You will see that the people running in with the convenient and money-moving solutions were, once again, the people who orchestrated the convenient problem.
I am learning to FIGHT LIKE TRUMP, and I’m going to SPREAD THE TECH, so to speak.
KNOWING THEIR M.O. is really starting to pay off for our side, and combining that with NUKES (of the information kind) and KNOWING WHO TO NUKE – which isn’t always the guiltiest party, but frequently the most STRATEGICALLY VULNERABLE…..
Sometimes being an escaping Buffalo lets you hear more than your friends Fly or Wolf.
…..is a real form of force multiplication.
Let’s get distracted by the “Branch Covidian” analogy for a second. This goes somewhere. Like the Branch Qvidians we were supposed to be.
Thus, to go back to the Clintons, we see a “future-proves-past” application of the Alinsky technique of freezing and isolating a “bad guy” was used on the Branch Davidians to go after guns, and yet in the beautiful way that Hillary Clinton always SCREWED UP…..
…..the other side was left in a kind of political debt which they never really got out of, and IMO that is part of why the GREAT AWAKENING is actually a thing.
This is not to say that the other side wasn’t able to keep pushing historic CRAP into the blender…..
…..or to subvert the American military and FBI almost fully into their designs…..
…..combined with some aspirin factories that eventually became a headache when a wolf sniffed some bottles in the rubble…..
…..thus realizing how this all connected to a repeatable and rather portable scam of creating security-state-monetizable bad guys who require us to give up our freedoms at the same time everybody gets robbed…..
…..however, the more beautiful part, in the Wolf’s opinion, was how much Great Awakening happened between THAT little incident and the NEXT bad guys – ISIS.
Why, one doesn’t think this much ACCEPTED REVELATION…..
…..happened all by itself, does one? Of course not. Some guys named “Q” were almost certainly doing quite a bit of work during that second Obama term that was supposed to be so fundamentally transforming.
I cannot claim credit for realizing that the tactical maneuver of Trump’s supporters to their political demise on January 6, 2021 at Capitol Hill, in Washington, DC, was something known to American historians and anthropologists as a buffalo jump. However, as soon as I heard the ill-fated demonstration called that, all my questions about what …
…..happened – perhaps with a little buffalo-tipping…..
….. and it became clear not only how prefabricated this little REICHSTAG was…..
Alternate Title: Bring Out The Owl! We continue with Part 2 of the Buffalo Jump series. For background, see Part 1: If you want a TL;DR version of what was wrong with the Capitol Rally on January 6, 2021, imagine trying to fit a million people into the little area numbered “8”, in the upper …
…..and that certain “white hats” who went along with this shit aren’t “uniformly” “white hats” (thank you, Scott)…..
Alternate Title: The moment I realized that GOD would back me in going asymmetrical on these unworthy China-compromised “U.S.” military bastards. I have recently come into possession of information which made a lot of things start making a lot more sense. I only needed a final confirmation that I was correct – and I just …
…..and how all the old parties involved in prior “events”, seem to be involved in the new ones…..
Impeachahontas Now Wearing Two Diapers Nobody expected Chris Wray to play Mafia Nan’s queen of diapers face-up on January 6, but that is exactly what appears to have happened. The only question now is WHY. To quote a friend from a former life, “AYE-YI-YI!” OK – let me back up a bit. First, I want …
…..then it ALL started coming together that We, The People had actually FORCED the “monetizers of created bad guys and events” to bring their little schtick a little closer to our little home on the range.
Please add links, tweets, videos, etc. for ALL identifications, charges, arrests, prosecutions, and sentencing of those who were at or in the Capitol Building on January 6. I’m finding a TON of this stuff hitting the media right now, and I’d like to keep it all in one place. This includes *JOURNALISTS* (CNN or others), …
Now – this here buffalo has to tell you – the Great Mystery might get a little pissed off if this guy…..
…..(that would be the OTHER QAnon garbageman) is going to be blamed for the sins of all the folks inside that building behind him, including this lady…..
…..as well as other potential information warfare targets who might be able to put a lid on this shit by backing the fuck off before alliances are deservedly shattered….
…..and by this shit, I mean where QAnon (QA) and other patriotic American groups are supposed to be the next Al Qaeda (AQ), in a kind of globally forced implosion on America, because we can already see that the money-grubbing phony “national security” people, who sure seem a lot more like global leeches, including a bunch of pseudo-American Brits and Aussies (OK, let’s be kind and show a DIFFERENT one with a 5-letter name)…..
…..every bit as phony as the Chinese American “citizens” who spy for the ChiComs – are just chomping at the bit to come down on AMERICAN PATRIOTS who can see what’s REALLY going on, having been the victims of a little bit of, what might we call it, maybe “Britcasting”?
…..which didn’t exactly work…..
…..but hey – sometimes it’s better to surprise the burglars and robbers, and instead of going after THEM, just put a round in the ATM machine, so it stops spitting out the bills!
…..and it’s not like the Great Spirit needs to use the crude methods of self-infliction used on that fine September day, because – in this case – self-infliction happened on a fine January day, and at a lovely place a short ways away from the ATM, indeed, at a place where I sang the Star Spangled Banner, written the LAST TIME some Brits tried to burn Congress down, only that time without any chumps in polygonal buildings, and not trying to pass it off as having been the work of American patriots.
ARE WE REACHING AN UNDERSTANDING YET?
Good. I have actual [American] [and ironically global] National Security WORK to do, which is not simply cleaning up absolutely unnecessary shit. But I did have time for an intro, which allowed me to skip a fuller and more blatantly obvious, accusatory, evidence-filled, and alliance-rending post. Some people should be thankful that I’m as lazy as I am.
TL;DR- = BTFO
SECOND INTRO
Now it’s time to get down to some science – the purpose of all this.
COVID-19 is both real and a scam, and that’s why it’s hard for people who’ve been deprived of AND LOGIC their whole lives to decide which one it is. It’s not one or the other – it’s BOTH.
The entire subject of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 reflects this conjoined reality of truth and falsehood. Almost every aspect of this subject is both REAL and A SCAM. Every piece of the puzzle appears to be both TRUE and FALSE.
One might expect such a cunning thing, in YET ANOTHER MONETIZATION PLOT.
Are you seeing why I had that other intro? Good. What we have here, is ANOTHER fake bad guy – albeit rather microscopic – being used to gin up ANOTHER fake event, but a whole lot of REAL MONEY.
OK, I’ll admit it. Maybe it’s just REAL FAKE MONEY.
Better? Yeah, I like that better, too. Because I like REALITY, and that includes REAL MONEY.
Which seems to be becoming a bit POPULAR lately.
COVID-19 doesn’t want to answer questions. People who need solid answers FAST will not get them. People who need satisfying answers will have to wait. However, they won’t have to wait much longer. CRACKS are forming in stonewalls. Stories are being whispered by data. Many theories and ideas dry up and blow away, but some are sticking around, and appearing fundamental.
This post is NOT going to explain the basics of viruses and vaccines. THAT will be another post.
This post is going to throw some HONKIN’ HUNKS of precious metals, and some BIG-ASS diamond and sapphire pavers, through some MASSIVE picture windows – and these objects will just pass through glass to your amazement. I am going to CHANGE YOUR VIEW of this disease in fundamental but GOOD ways. Ways that tell you REAL NORMAL is still there, like it always was, and all this other BULLSHIT is an illusion.
I’m going to challenge your fundamental thinking about this disease, hopefully so that you “can’t unsee” certain ideas.
Are you ready? Here we go.
I will start off with an idea that will be used, very admittedly, to GAIN CREDIBILITY, by showing you where somebody SMART could have been EVEN SMARTER.
*** 1 ***
Resisting The Vaccination of Children And Supporting Natural Immunity Is Valorous
One of the absolute best things that President Trump ever did was to bring Dr. Scott Atlas aboard, as a common sense counterweight to the plotters Fauci and Birx.
And I mean PLOTTERS. When I’m done with this post, you’re going to want to see Fauci and Birx in prison. They will be lucky to get off with simply losing power. But when you see what REALLY happened – how DELIBERATE DECEIT about Influenza-Like Illnesses (ILIs) was weaponized against the world, to get rid of Trump and advance the Democrat, Globalist and Chinese political agendas, you will also see that the only way this could have been possible, is by deliberate misrepresentation of the facts to President Trump and America.
Fauci and Birx HAD TO KNOW. In my opinion, they felt that it was SO NECESSARY to get rid of Trump, that they were morally justified to hide the truths that they hid from us.
Well, we will let the justice system be the judge of that.
And, of course, Trump knew. I love that he finally got a chance to LET THEM HAVE IT.
The following is adapted from a speech delivered on February 18, 2021, at a Hillsdale College National Leadership Seminar in Phoenix, Arizona.
The COVID pandemic has been a tragedy, no doubt. But it has exposed profound issues in America that threaten the principles of freedom and order that we Americans often take for granted.
First, I have been shocked at the unprecedented exertion of power by the government since last March—issuing unilateral decrees, ordering the closure of businesses, churches, and schools, restricting personal movement, mandating behavior, and suspending indefinitely basic freedoms. Second, I was and remain stunned—almost frightened—at the acquiescence of the American people to such destructive, arbitrary, and wholly unscientific rules, restrictions, and mandates.
The pandemic also brought to the forefront things we have known existed and have tolerated for years: media bias, the decline of academic freedom on campuses, the heavy hand of Big Tech, and—now more obviously than ever—the politicization of science. Ultimately, the freedom of Americans to seek and state what they believe to be the truth is at risk.
Let me say at the outset that I, like all of us, acknowledge that the consequences of the COVID pandemic and its management have been enormous. Over 500,000 American deaths have been attributed to the virus; more will follow. Even after almost a year, the pandemic still paralyzes our country. And despite all efforts, there has been an undeniable failure to stop cases from escalating and to prevent hospitalizations and deaths.
But there is also an unacknowledged reality: almost every state and major city in the U.S., with a handful of exceptions, have implemented severe restrictions for many months, including closures of businesses and in-person schools, mobility restrictions and curfews, quarantines, limits on group gatherings, and mask mandates dating back to at least last summer. And despite any myths to the contrary, social mobility tracking of Americans and data from Gallup, YouGov, the COVID-19 Consortium, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have all shown significant reductions of movement as well as a consistently high percentage of mask-wearing since the late summer, similar to the extent seen in Western Europe and approaching the extent seen in Asia.
I cannot recommend this article highly enough. This article should be a rallying point for our fight, on many, many fronts. This is Scott Atlas “setting the record straight”, and in the process, revealing the moral and logical failure of our intellectual institutions to be HONEST in their disagreements about COVID-19, and all that surrounds it.
But I’m not going to get into that right now. I want to talk about only ONE particular point, but it is one which TOTALLY CHANGES THE FIGHT.
It is my only criticism of Dr. Atlas on COVID-19. It is a point where, I believe, he should have been even MORE aggressive, seeking utter clarity, and fighting for the CONSERVATIVE POSITION of natural immunity.
So what was the point?
One of the things you will notice, if you read this piece, is that Dr. Atlas defends himself as having ACTUALLY SAID or having NOT ACTUALLY SAID certain things – including whether or not he said, either verbatim or in essence, that we should “let children catch the disease.” He denied – or perhaps it’s better to say he quibbled about – having said this.
And he’s right. Dr. Atlas was terribly misread, misquoted, and even maliciously slandered.
People always look weak when they very correctly say “I didn’t say that”, about something which may or may not be an implication of what they DID say, but the “optics” of weakness are beside the point.
The problem is much more fundamental. The problem is that the media uses this questioning technique to pin people down AWAY from where they should be. It is a brilliant deception, by which the media keeps its victims stating that – TRULY – they did not say the controversial but correct thing that they SHOULD HAVE SAID.
It’s a game. A form of misdirection. A con job. Intellectual whack-a-mole, where the TRUTH is the mole that should be a lion. A cunning use of “Alinsky fears” – “YOU DIDN’T SAY THAT, DID YOU?” – to keep an opponent away from that opponent’s most powerful argument.
And the proper answer to the question, quite literally, is “I didnt say that – BUT I SHOULD HAVE, AND HERE’S WHY.“
Under further questioning, “Yes. I’m saying that NOW.“
The technique of media misdirection away from an unstated power point is a brilliant kind of “forced inverted quasi-strawman”, which gets one to refute their own best implied argument, by backing off from the insinuated truth.
It’s ingenious, and it works. But it’s WRONG. It DEMANDS push-back.
Stated bluntly, I believe that Dr. Atlas SHOULD have admitted the following:
“YES – we want to let children risk catching COVID-19, because we have NO REASON to believe that vaccine immunity will be better than natural immunity, and every reason to believe that natural immunity will be SUPERIOR to vaccine immunity in every possible way, including both effectiveness and safety. It will be stronger and more durable immunity, almost without a doubt. And for children, it’s very likely to be safer than the vaccine. We need to think about the children’s future – not assuaging our own fears now.”
Once you SEE this – once you REALIZE how true this is – you realize that IT WAS A HILL WORTH DYING ON – AND NOBODY WOULD HAVE DIED.
There would have been a week-long firefight, where the media would attempt to “push it through” to “chickenpox parties” – just NO, YOU FUCKERS (we’d be rough, and it would be fun) – ending in the media pouting “well, you have no proof the new vaccines won’t be just as safe as current childhood immunizations”.
And you KNOW it would have been a “safe” bet that the new vaccines could not be that safe, but NOBODY HAD TO SAY THAT. Just wait for the facts on safety, but KNOW the following already:
(a) The actual HISTORY of the immune effectiveness of childhood diseases versus the LOWER effectiveness of our vaccines for them, says that natural immunity would be more effective – stronger and more durable.
(b) The actual HISTORY of all vaccines tells us that the low-hanging fruit has been more thoroughly picked already, and newer vaccines against harder targets, tend to be less safe, less effective, or both.
Do you see how EASY this would have been? We should have HELD THE LINE on letting children – our precious children – get the STRONGEST IMMUNITY POSSIBLE, AS SOON AND AS SAFELY AS KNOWINGLY POSSIBLE.
And not just that – THESE ARGUMENTS extend to many adults as well, who are at LOW RISK.
Trump insinuated more strongly on children’s natural immunity – as strongly and as often as he could – but we the scientists could have been stronger. Yeah, I will admit it – I’m a year late and trillions of dollars short, too.
THIS is why I say that Atlas was STRATEGICALLY correct – we needed to defend children – which he did. But TACTICALLY, we should have pushed further and deeper, to not just hold the ground on children, but to advance past it.
And that brings me to my next point.
*** 2 ***
Volunteers for Natural Immunity are Braver than the Vaccinated and Deserve Respect
Again, we see how the phony Fake News media, as a SHILL for med-pharma-socialism, the Democrat Party, and the CCP, has inverted the reality of the vaccinated vs. those who choose to risk the disease for the stronger immunity it imparts.
Play CHICKEN GAMES – get CHICKEN IMMUNITY.
And this extends to those of us who were merely VICTIMS of the disease, and didn’t even get a T-shirt saying:
“I HAD MULTIPLE COMORBIDITIES, I WENT THROUGH HYPOXIC HELL, AND ALL I GOT WAS STRONG IMMUNITY AND THIS DAMN T-SHIRT”.
This is a bit of a pet peeve of mine, actually, as a VICTIM of COVID-19, who is now holding, as my meager golden chump change, the ACTUAL STRONGER IMMUNITY.
I don’t WANT your weak and unpredictable vaccine. I got the disease and LIVED. I like my immunity. I pick my nose, I eat off other people’s plates, I don’t wear a mask, and life is just like before.
GO TO HELL, KAREN.
I have watched how SO MANY people, who understand their own health and their own RISKS, have felt FORCED to do the opposite of their natural inclination – to either get the vaccine or NOT get the vaccine – because of pressure by those around them, or worse yet, by highly conflicted stakeholders like Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates, highly conflicted organizations like CDC and WHO, and highly conflicted politicians like Andrew Cuomo and Gavin Newsom.
I have watched these same victimized people – including posters on this blog – dealing with what I can only describe as psychological and social ABUSE at the hands of the ant-like MINIONS of the conflicted socialist scum – victimization that should never happen in a free society.
The Karens and Kens and Chicken Littles who try to FORCE upon these victims their vaccine paranoia – and by vaccine paranoia I mean the absurd idea that “you have to get the vaccine to save ME – and GRANDMA” – I mean WHAT THE HELL – sorry – just CUT IT OUT, you BLUE SCUM. This is socialist propaganda, mediated through false and blame-shifted guilt-mongering, and it needs to be driven from American society with prejudice, because we don’t want this crap back.
Now – I’m not just blowing SMOKE that natural immunity to COVID-19 is QUALITY STUFF. You see, there is an excellent and respected scientific study on this, appearing in Science, funded by Fauci’s own rat operation, and touted by NIH, that you have not heard about, because our SHILL MEDIA didn’t want you to hear about it.
Yeah, think about that. An NIH-touted study that the media just missed. DARN!
The study says the natural immunity is mediated by multiple known and measured immunological mechanisms, and is still nice and strong even 8 months after recovery.
IN FACT, the NATURAL immunity is giving them HOPE that the vaccine immunity MIGHT BE just as good.
This work is not unique – similar early studies by other researchers were cited in the New York Times back in August of 2020.
You got that? Natural immunity is proven to last. Your vaccines which – as we know from over a century of experience, are almost invariably LESS immunizing than the disease – may last as long IF WE ARE LUCKY.
Yeah, I’m a little pissed about having had this disease, having permanent shortness of breath, and then being forced to wear a STUPID hypoxia-inducing mask, when I’m IMMUNE, and more immune than with your damn vaccine.
You want a link for the hypoxia part? I DID THE WORK MYSELF.
TL;DR – skip down to “Crucial Experiment” and read how you can prove to yourself that masks cause real and measurable cognitive decline that lasts long after you unmask. NPR and other leftists who say masks don’t affect you and your children are LYING. LOOK, it’s time to be blunt. Senility – Cognitive Decline – …
BYE, KAREN! You hear me? And take your damn masks and vaccination passports with you!
I’m IMMUNE, you BITCH!!!
Seriously, having a population of CONTROLS is smart science, and if Fauci were a better and more honest scientist, he would have gotten out ahead on that long ago, and ironically would have gotten more of the right people vaccinated, but – well – they’re not in this for any of their stated reasons.
*** 3 ***
In The Game of Mutant Variant Fear-Mongering Chicken, Fauci Swerved
Have you noticed how there is SO MUCH BTFO on the COVID-19 “variants” thing, lately?
It’s like all of a sudden, nobody wants to talk about variant doom. Indeed – THIS article….
…..was news released on March 30, and Anthony Fauci is even LISTED as “available for comment” on it!
There’s a reason.
Playing Chicken With The Truth Is Always Dangerous
Now, it is WAY TOO EARLY for a non-epidemiologist like me to opine as to which side of the “variants” infinity-hedron is most correct, but I’m here to tell you that THIS THING’S GOT SIDES OUT THE WAZOO, and yet the number of sides is dropping electric-razor fast, and it will be painful when whatever remains passes through Fauci’s rear end as the final truth, whatever that truth may be.
On the one side, there is, and has been, from the very beginning, evidence that “variants” are real, but not a big problem.
But did MUH VARIANTS suddenly get worse?
Doctor Rand Paul brilliantly but subtle as a ship-destroying laser through a window CALLED OUT the author of the Fauci Virus on his role in scaremongering against persistent realities, and I will admit to having ridden down on his bomb with some of my own contribution to the massive BTFO which ensued.
Introduction You have GOT to see the video I’m going to show you. It’s not just what they’re talking about. It’s WHERE IT LEADS. Most of the people who watch Rand Paul go after Fauci here, are concentrating on MASKS, because that is the TOP LAYER of the argument. But THAT is the small potatoes. …
And yeah, I could not help but notice WHERE the suddenly bad variant problem got suddenly bad…..
But before that, the “variants” problem turned even further South for the Branch Covidians, when yet another scientist – this one uncomfortably close to Bill Gates – noted that the “variants problem” could mean vaccines were a huge backfire all along – but without going “full Marek”. And this dude went “full chicken” against the vaccine establishment, with that little medical mafia punk in the driver’s seat.
In this open letter I am appealing to the @WHO and all stakeholders involved, no matter their conviction, to immediately declare such action as THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY OF INTERNATIONAL CONCERN. Please read and share: https://t.co/0Fupw9JInP#COVID19pic.twitter.com/I24mSjpVKM
Not trusting Twitter, let’s just save that tweet….
…..as well as his open letter…..
He also did a nice interview explaining his warnings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtHfI00D_s4
That interview was then re-explained by Del Bigtree.
What you are seeing RIGHT NOW is how politicized the science has become, to where this guy has to go on TWITTER, or get picked up by YouTubers and podcasters, to call into the open what should be a big open question in science.
The game is normally – if you want to keep your job in science – to massage one’s own message of truly perceived truth toward the media’s badly managed but persistently publicly perceived mainstream “bag of somebody’s intentional errors” so as not to lose the credibility needed to stay in the game. It’s sick, it’s wrong, and it’s ugly. But honestly, you have to be RETIRED in science to speak what you’re really thinking, any more. The MEDIA controls too much of it.
Watch PBS science these days, and you realize it’s all about DAMAGE CONTROL.
That’s a good thing, compared to what it was. It means WE’RE WINNING. Slowly, painfully, and at great cost, but we’re beating these bastards back.
REVEL in the coast-down, brothers and sisters.
https://youtu.be/3xOkF0PtsTE
“YOUR LAPTOPS ARE *GROUNDED*!!! ok not really.” “SIR!!!”
*** 4 ***
Vaccine Passports Are a Gift to Patriots
I’m just gonna keep this short. Vaccine Passports are going to create a rebellion like you’ve never seen. They’re the best enemy overreach since Obama made the mistake of including “Bibles” with “guns” in his “bitter clingers” statement.
Here I am – a recoveree – science NOW on my side PERSONALLY to keep my natural immunity – science IN THE FUTURE (if it were honest) on my side to take a risk and KEEP me as a CONTROL going forward, even though I’d probably tolerate the vaccine no problems – even idiot-build Moderna 1.0……
…..meaning I’m volunteering to catch “in the wild” version COVID-25 just to make the science better…..
……and yet the statists, dumb as oxen, just keep pushing the forced vaccination stupidity.
Because it’s not about the disease. It’a about control.
Just keep overreachin’, guys. I never thought they’d set me up to win SCIENCE MINDS.
And yet HERE we are…..
*** 5 ***
Treating SARS-CoV-2 as Flying Snakebite Solves Most Mysteries of the Disease and the Vaccines
I’m just being cute there. Here is a better title, probably acceptable to many scientific journals.
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Analogies to Components of Crotalid Snake Venoms and Application to Treatment of COVID-19 and Vaccine Adverse Effects
The first title is so very “Q Tree”. The second is more like Wolf in his former life. The word “analogies” is pushing it, editorially, but that can be played properly in the body of the paper, baiting in a reviewer-pleasing disclaimer on limiting the extent of the comparison, and all is good.
I’m not sure when I first realized that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (hereafter “SP”) bore a remarkable resemblance to hemotoxic snake venoms, but I am thinking it was after I realized that the preponderance of vaccine side effects in the clinical trials were either hematological, cardiovascular, similar to the disease itself, or all of the above.
Analogies are frequently crap, and they’re never perfect BECAUSE they’re analogies, but they’re still the best beater screwdrivers ever to start fixing stuff in Scienceville. When Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell saved millions of elderly lives from Chinese/Deep State duplicity by a limited but very useful comparison of COVID-19 hypoxia to high-altitude sickness, and realized we were doing vents seriously wrong and killing people, God smiled, wept, and said “The fallacy of fallacy – this guy gets it.”
What follows isn’t anywhere near that good, but it gave me an opportunity to retweet Doc Cameron’s angelic post in a form Twitter and YouTube can never take down.
The idea that side-effects of the C19 vaccines might be similar to the disease itself is just baseline reasoning. The main active vaccine component of ALL of the vaccines for COVID-19 is either a stabilized spike protein (SSP), or the genetic instructions thereof (in mRNA or DNA). SSP is basically SP with a very few amino acids or corresponding genetic sequences replaced to make the SSP molecule hold its shape in the most immunizing form reminiscent of SP. This is done because natural SP changes shape drastically upon interaction with cellular receptors to which it attaches, This vaccine-undesirable behavior assists virus entry, and also suppresses the opportunity to gain immunity by antibodies reacting to the “normal” unchanged form. Evolution. Beautiful stuff. GOD-MODE reality. Antibodies react to the CHANGED form instead, and become fairly useless. Life gets Lagrangian, and we’re in the pipe, 5:5.
Once you realize how “out of the pipe” that movie really is, you start seeing some really interesting curves. But what the heck, it’s Good Friday. It’s all good.
Back to the story. Snakes and all.
Wikipedia denigrates (or more charitably overlooks) a guy named Bill Haast to obscurity as a proponent/explorer of mitrhidatism, which bluntly means the near-if-not-actual fallacy of taking poison to gain immunity to it, but in my opinion Haast was really one of the first people to explore in a serious way not only the general mithridatism-vaccination continuum, but even more specifically the fact that small molecules don’t provide enough mathematical possibility for organisms to beat poisoning (yet – wink), but proteins do, and thus life as a multi-faceted thing which makes and breaks protein poisoning as a tactic, can bargain and negotiate back to the beautiful place where it works for all beasts, great or small.
Come again?
Sure.
Bill Haast was injecting himself with snake venoms, which don’t contain fluoride, strychnine, tetrodotoxin, dioxin, cocaine, meth, lead, osmium tetroxide, or a lot of other small-molecule poisons, but DO contain, as their most interesting and active components, PROTEINS, which do in fact lend themselves to mithridatism – whoops – I meant vaccination.
Proteins which do things remarkably similar to the SPIKE PROTEIN of SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Once you see this, almost every aspect of reality underlying Branch Covidianism can be explained logically, which I find wonderfully ironic, coming from a Branch Qvidian who actually believes in God as a useful tool of deep protoscience, because a universe that gunpoints everybody toward where Moses went on TRUTH without guns – oh, man – what a ride. I’ll take more Top Macguffin with my popcorn, please!
I’ve pontificated intermittently and increasingly on the utility of looking at spike protein through the snake venom looking glass, which is not meant to keep people from vaccinating, but rather to show people how some of the most useful scientists – like Bill Haast and some guy named Faraday – are a deep part of the beauty, and if your child out there is some little girl who likes snakes and spiders, don’t change her sex – just LET HER. Science doesn’t have to be neat. It just has to be RIGHT.
I will include a few links to those pontifications as I find them, but here is one for starters.
Maybe I won’t find the other links. Why? I’m going to throw a freebie to the “natsec” people I just burned. If instead of “going after” QAnons and other “extremists” you did something incredibly useful, and got all Bob Massie and SciFinder on the future of populist good, you might do more good than harm.
*** 6 ***
Did Fauxi and Birx Hide Beta Coronavirus Prevalence and Diagnostic Cross-Over in Antibody Tests, and Non-Infective Coronavirus Genetic Incorporation, To Assist PCR-Based Fragment Fraud?
I think it’s time to ask.
One of the biggest mysteries / non-mysteries of this whole COVID thing has been the seeming disappearance of ACTUAL INFLUENZA from epidemiological statistics, as well as the prior 4 weak beta coronaviruses, almost all being not just displaced, but REPLACED by COVID-19.
There are “good” explanations for this, but to be frank, they support the Branch Covidian narrative a little too much for my tastes. Have a listen. This dude is WAAAAAAY SOOOOTHING to listen to.
You gettin’ that same vibe?
The fact is, viruses DO COMPETE, and that competition activates our defenses, making the competition even more severe, so one virus DOES help protect you from the next. But that doesn’t make ALL the funny business I’m seeing go away.
Now, it’s a bit ironic that this guy’s same reasoning about interferons from one infection preventing others – which also happens during vaccination (as taught to me by Dr. Shiva), is EXACTLY why you should never get two vaccines at the same time, in my careful opinion, because I get the feeling that this dude would check the PC position on multi-vax before assuring us that “Medicine Knows Best(TM)” and “don’t worry about multiple vaccines – your vaccines have all been tested and are found to be safe, blah, blah, blah.”
But there is something that even more fundamentally bothers me about his explanation. Viral interference only works by something ACTUALLY infecting people, who then become protected against THAT virus and OTHER THINGS. The only non-infected people who are protected beyond that, are protected by herd immunity.
Stated differently, if there are enough infections with COVID-19 in the population to STOP THE FLU (that’s how it works – RIIIIIGHT?) then surely there must be enough infections with COVID-19 to be preventing COVID-19 itself from finding new hosts by that same mathematical protection, too – RIIIIIGHT? Which is herd immunity. That should be showing up BIGLY.
But we’re not at COVID-19 herd immunity yet. And yet FLU doesn’t seem to be standing a chance.
You seein’ that? This is, quite bluntly, “weird kinetics”. Something very fishy about this excuse. I’m not exactly buying it – especially when the “kinetics” of faulty testing seem to explain things better, as we will see.
I am buying that SOME viral interference is likely going on, but his whole reassuring spiel just seems a bit too pat. Certain meters are just pegging out, and they’re not the good meters.
If you read the comments on this video, there is evidence that (1) many places are no longer even testing for flu, which very much supports where I’m going, but (2) supposedly, in some that HAVE tested for both COVID and flu, influenza has basically disappeared.
Sure, the absolute MESS that CDC created in both testing and statistics is not making me trust all the numbers, so let’s just say that viral interference is VERY LIKELY. But is it responsible for everything?
I have even thought – and I simply CANNOT dismiss this hypothesis – that maybe – just MAYBE – the flu vaccine was working a LOT better than these people were letting on, but that the argument in Branch Covidian clerical circles was “We can’t let off on the mantras of MOAR COMPLIANCE, or we’ll lose ground.”
What this would have meant is that ACTUAL endemic levels of influenza are far lower than we the public thought, because the CDC was pushing for vaccine compliance at levels that would solve flu at its frequently epidemic levels. Combine a different bug grabbing the golden epidemic ring with people still taking their flu shots for epidemic influenza levels, and influenza was just beaten down silly.
Which is viral interference PLUS flu vaccination “over-compliance” – basically vaccination that was actually working as a public health response, even with MANY people not taking it, but no, they have to always lie to us about things NOT working to get more compliance. Flu vaccine “failure because of YOU” is the white guilt of public health. Now coronavirus vaccine “failure because of YOU” is the Christian guilt to go with it.
Bastards. It’s not about solving the problem. It’s about CONTROL.
But it gets WORSE.
Enter TWO very interesting phenomena that were EXPOSED and oddly not anticipated.
(a) Antibody Testing Yahooism and Crossover from Other Coronaviruses
One of the things that really bothered me about American antibody testing was that the CDC loaded those numbers into normal infected “cases”. They didn’t count antibody positives as a separate kind of case, which would have made sense. They actually added them to regular infection case numbers, along with the numbers from the (already bad) PCR test.
But it got worse. We couldn’t even trust the antibody tests to give us good numbers on COVID-19, because once they arrived, there was a disclaimer that they might – or as was verified later WERE – picking up antibodies from prior infections with OTHER, NON-COVID-19, coronaviruses.
Holy CRAP.
And then, of course, this gets worse because we later learn that people are over-cooking PCR tests everywhere, trying to get bigger COVID numbers, or just because they never calibrated their machines.
Science! Yeah – it really works WHEN YOU ACTUALLY DO IT.
When you fake it? Not so much.
(b) Benign but Test-Significant Genetic Incorporation of SARS-CoV-2 and Possibly Other Coronaviruses
I have a VERY hard time believing that Anthony Fauci didn’t KNOW “coronavirus fragment replay from genetic incorporation” was either a FACT, or at least a possibility. OK – I’ll be more blunt. I think he KNEW, and kept it as an ACE IN THE HOLE.
Now I could explain this one very quickly, too, but I think people need the full monty here, because we have been having a lot of debates on genetic incorporation, and this is a point that is hotly debated with Branch Covidians. So I’m going to take this one very slowly. You may learn something.
One of the most “fun facts” – I thought – was the idea that our genomes, and the genomes of most life on this planet, seem to be literally chock full of VIRAL TRASH, accumulated over eons. It’s almost like that principle that everybody has royalty SOMEWHERE in their family tree, except it would be more like double digit percentages of royalty. I mean, “WHUUUUUUT? You KIDDING me?”
So just keep that in mind as we go forward. There is viral TRASH filling up our genomes. It must have gotten there somehow. I’ll bet it was VIRUSES!
“VIRUSES DID WHUUUUT?”
So – I walk into this whole COVID thing, and the very first vaccine that gets into the news, I go digging on it, and it not only turns out to be a “Bill Gates vaccine” [HINT – almost ALL the top vaccines have Bill Gates funding] – it turns out it’s a DNA vaccine.
Yup. Those little circles are DNA.
So I’m just a stupid outsider with too much knowledge to keep from asking stupidly annoying questions, so I ask one, like “well, if these are genetic vaccines, which are supposed to have all the “genetic advantages” of viruses as genetic vectors, what happens if they actually DO act like viruses and leave JUNK?
It’s NOT an unreasonable question, and this not only gives me an opportunity to explain WHY – it gives me a opportunity to deal with multiple types of annoying propaganda very quickly.
The first vaccines (as we know them) were ACTUALLY VIRUSES. That’s why they’re called “vaccines“, and vaccination is called “vaccination” – because it started with infection with cowpox, which eventually “gained function” (meaning mutations that make a virus “better” at something) to become the vaccinia virus. [This is disregarding the likely fact that part of that gain of function may have been humans foisting a sequence quantum jump to the very similar horsepox, already a natural GOF.] So in a WAY, we treated smallpox with one of the very first “DNA vaccines” [MASSIVE QUOTES] – that being an actual live virus.
Let me drill down on that a bit.
Viruses are just DNA or RNA in a protein wrapper which is coded for by the DNA or RNA, along with any other proteins useful in the HACK that viruses are.
THUS, any vaccine which uses “live” RNA or DNA which THEN creates protein antigens which prompt your immunity, is essentially (but not precisely, in the way we ACTUALLY talk about them) an RNA or DNA vaccine. If it’s weakened or dead virus, and it’s only the PROTEIN of the shell of the virus that’s activating your immunity, then it’s NOT “in essence” an RNA or DNA vaccine.
Let me say this in another way that is more direct in dealing with certain propaganda.
It is kinda silly (to me) to say that mRNA vaccines and DNA vaccines are not vaccines, because of the genetic angle, when they actually get back to the principles of the ORIGINAL vaccines, which used the DNA or RNA of a live or attenuated virus to CREATE ANTIGEN.
I’m basically saying that not only do mRNA and DNA vaccines fit the very general and beautiful MODERNCDC definition of a vaccine – they very closely hew to the OLDEST definition of a vaccine from GEORGE WASHINGTON’S TIME – thanks to the dependence on mRNA or DNA.
I mean, DAYUM – the history of science is SO FREAKIN’ COOL. Stuff just COMES BACK INTO FASHION.
It was only later, when we used dead viruses, or synthetic recombinant proteins and glycoproteins from the viruses, that we actually GOT AWAY from using vaccines that relied on DNA or RNA, and were INSTEAD using the final protein itself.
Now if you want to go on saying “mRNA and DNA vaccines are not vaccines – they’re gene therapy” – I will make you one final offer of compromise – could we agree that they’re BOTH? Because if you can agree to that, you’re going to love an upcoming section of this post.
OK – I’m done with that point for now.
ANYWAY, what I found in this COVID thing, is that NOBODY in Big Pharma or Big Vaccines (like Bill Gates) really wanted to talk about the genetic aspects of these vaccines. There are multiple reasons, some obvious, some not. The genetic stuff is simply controversial.
And THAT is useful, if you don’t want people talking about it FOR OTHER REASONS – like making a scam work.
Now I was talking to Duchess, Grandma, Cthulhu and Scott, about Fauci, in the comments HERE, when Cthulhu said THIS:
“The thing is, this isn’t Fauci’s first rodeo. He spectacularly failed during the AIDS crisis, forever calling for vaccines that never happened — and pooh-poohing therapeutics, thereby sentencing many thousands to a miserable death.“
And then Scott said THIS:
“What if he’s not ‘failing’ at all? What if he is accomplishing exactly what he intends to accomplish, it’s just not what you think he’s trying to accomplish?”
To which I responed like THIS:
“Yeah, that is the key. You nailed it. Fauci likely had his eyes on a vaccine that could be given to everybody, which would allow gene therapy to commence. OMG, that’s it. You solved the crime! THIS PAPER gives away the game!!!” https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1.full
I urge you to read that whole section, starting HERE.
Now – my speculation right there, on Fauci’s motive being gene therapy, is just pure speculation, since I don’t yet even have any idea what KIND of vaccine he was interested in for AIDS, but I think that gene therapy is at least PART of the motive of almost everybody in the Big Pharma push for COVID-19 vaccines right now. This is not a hard bet. Wait for the next section of this post.
Short version – a good SCAM to force gene therapy on society targets the “red up arrow” “special” feedback to DNA in the following image, doing so accidentally, which both HIV and (apparently) coronavirus(es) do.
LOL. Why, what a coincidence.
However, more relevant to the question of this section, RE the “fragment fraud”, is the idea that Fauci has now shown TWICE an extreme interest in vaccines for viruses which incorporate to some significant extent into the genome. This means that a person infected with them, is basically STUCK as a positive test, if you scam things properly using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This isn’t the same motive as genetic therapy, but it COULD be a bonus.
SO….. was PCR identified as an abusable all along? Hold my wine, I’m getting Kary Mullis on the science-radar-love phone without resorting to dark means (meaning I did a great web search and found this real treat for you). Kary always said it WAS being abused. And while I suggested a maybe kinda “well, at least try this” fix for that on these pages a while back, I imagine I was far from the first to suggest it.
OK – let’s back up AGAIN. In my response to Scott, I cited THIS paper, submitted December 14, 2020.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
Summary
Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery, yet these patients most commonly are non-infectious1–14. Here we investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for PCR-positive tests. In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome. To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration, we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients. This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication.
This paper is showing that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is incorporating into the genetics of people, and it potentially explains why some people shed test-triggering virus protein and/or protein FRAGMENTS for a long time.
But what is so cool about this work is how politically incorrect that science was at the time, and still is, precisely because the TRUTH might be ammunition for the antivaxxers! HA. What scientific WEAKLINGS. Follow that link above to the paper, or to a Science article discussing it, and you will see – there were Branch Covidian clergy already thinking there needed to be an Inquisition, and maybe suppression of this work which might lead people into error. Oh, Ann Coulter was so right – it’s a RELIGION.
So – how does this ALL come together? Let’s replay the title of this section, to bring all the pieces together.
Did Fauxi and Birx Hide Beta Coronavirus Prevalence and Diagnostic Cross-Over in Antibody Tests, and Non-Infective Coronavirus Genetic Incorporation, To Assist PCR-Based Fragment Fraud?
The pieces of the scam are:
lots of pre-COVID coronaviruses – more than people realize
influenza baseline being effectively beaten down by “hidden” vaccine over-compliance
early release of COVID-19 which was denied by the media, WHO and the CDC
cross-over in testing by (maybe) influenza and/or (mostly) pre-COVID coronaviruses
counting antibody tests as actual cases NOW
COVID-19 definitely engaging in “fragment genetic incorporation”
other coronaviruses likely doing the same
PCR tests being run at default cycles
PCR tests being run at too many cycles “to be safe”
PCR tests for COVID-19 being run either FIRST or EXCLUSIVELY
PCR tests picking up recoverees shedding fragments in an accelerating curve
antibody tests picking up other coronaviruses and recoverees b/c fragments
If you look at this honestly, the whole thing is TIPPED to giving too high of numbers, and the only thing that will get good numbers is scientific discipline, pushing back AWAY from a positive diagnosis. One has to talk BACK to borderline diagnosis and say NO.
The PROBLEM with that is that FEAR pushes people to ERR on the side of CAUTION and say MAYBE or YES – this is a case – resulting in borderline tests being run for extra PCR cycles, or cycle settings being WAY too high, or people just calling it a case to be safe.
The psychology sabotaged this thing from the beginning. And I think people KNEW THIS.
And yet, they clearly didn’t have HIGH ENOUGH numbers to guarantee removal of Trump (the obvious objective), so CUOMO and his henchmen and henchladies conspired to push the numbers even HIGHER in nursing homes.
WHATEVER.
The real point is this. The TESTING PARADIGM was FLAWED, and people who knew better did NOT try to get accurate numbers by pushing back on known defects or risks in the testing – they tried to get BIGGER numbers by PRETENDING they didn’t know.
Yeah.
Democrats. Like Fauci and Birx.
*** 7 ***
No Matter What One Calls The COVID-19 Vaccines, mRNA and DNA Vaccines are Now an Open Gateway to Gene Therapy and Genetic Modification
This is where I come out of the closet on transhumanism. Bluntly, I’m not TOTALLY opposed to ideas of advancing technology. I just think we have to be HONEST and RESPONSIBLE TO THE PEOPLE in letting technology advance.
There is a continuum on “trans”, with transbutchery on one end, and transfiguration on the other end, but I refuse to call everything in the middle “bad”, because God implements in the real world, and building the Kingdom of Heaven means HERE and NOW.
Yup. I listened to too many radio preachers. I spoke to too many Christians and Jews and Buddhists on the opposite end of the world and everywhere in between, thanks to technology. MAXWELL and FARADAY helped save my ass. And TESLA says there’s MOAR, and it can be a GOOD THING.
One of the things I did at the beginning of this COVID ride, when I saw that everybody was HIDING the fact that we were rolling out genetic vaccines with minimal disclosure on the genetic part, clearly as a way of keeping the anti-vax response from going off the charts too soon, was to challenge everybody on Twitter with rather neutral mini-disclosures, as well as polls that would help everybody ‘fess up to reality. On the one side, it’s important to “ease out” the truth, but on the other side, it’s just important to get the truth out AT ALL.
So I got GREAT responses on my various polls including (1) would you take a BILL GATES VACCINE and (2) would you take a TRUMP VACCINE, with TRUST turning out to be a big thing – up to a point. But what people may not have noticed, was my craftily mixing in there, as much as I could, the more real ideas of mRNA and DNA vaccines.
Now I’m rightfully leery of mRNA and DNA vaccines simply as an honest scientist who knows MISTAKES HAVE BEEN MADE in the past, and now is no time for that to stop, in our much more finite universe than some that are possible. Yes, it’s a small risk, given the larger truth that…..
old-school vaccines that use live viruses, are *literal* DNA and RNA vaccines, if you get right down to it
……but the smaller truth is, even the Moderna scientists pre-quibbled on their own mRNA technology, with jazz hands aloft, saying as obscurely as they could, in one of their first vaccine papers, “BUH BUH BUH we warned you on long-range side effects as unknowns”, which are still a small but real risk, and that risk being IN ADDITION TO any dishonesty in Big Pharma, which of course NEVER happens.
Yup. Nobody can ever beat Scott467’s point that dishonesty by the industry AUTOMATICALLY JUSTIFIES vaccine refusal. Sorry – it just DOES. I don’t want to say YOU DAMN IDIOTS, but YOU DAMN IDIOTS.
But here is my new freebie to avoid the next debacle:
We’re CONTROLS, you idiots
Yup. Science needs controls. Vaccine refusers ARE CONTROLS – totally voluntary – fully informed – and just imagine if somebody smart came out and back-talked the idiot media and said:
“We will need controls – we’re good with the people who don’t want to vaccinate – they’ll help”
And when Blubbering Acosta and Sneering Welker push back in outraged tones, that person might say:
“Look, vaccine technology is accelerating – and it has to, and will, no matter what. Mistakes will be made along the way, but honesty fixes them as soon as possible. Keeping technology adoption voluntary is one of the single most important and best absolutes we can adhere to, as a nation and as a planet, for a bright future – just like free speech, just like independent science, just like respecting religious freedom – that can help us steer straight and not miss the mark. The press needs to stop being SCOLDS if they want to win back the hearts and minds they lost through helping their favorite party and candidates politicize science.”
Then, just let chattering, argumentative, toes-bouncing-on-fancy-chairs, press stupidity prove itself right there.
See? THAT is how to deal with advancing tech. VOLUNTARILY and HONESTLY.
OK, I really will get back to the subject.
How do I KNOW that they’re irreversibly gatewaying from these genetic vaccines to gene therapy and genetic modification (hereafter “genvac”, “genvax”, “genther”, “genmod” and the like)?
TWO WAYS.
(1) CRISPR-based vaccines – which are straight-up genvax by genmod – are waiting EXCITEDLY in the wings.
(2) The Bidenoids at Chemical & Engineering News (C&EN) couldn’t wait for the COVID-19 bodies to cool, before they started getting a serious Bidenish jones for GenVac‘s sexy sister GenTher and her crew of transhuman beauties.
And yeah – them Bidenoids are getting CRISPR and CRISPRER.
If you see CRISPR or CRISPR-Cas9 (explanatory infographic below) cited anywhere NEAR a vaccine, then you are talking actual, straight-up, genetic modification – GENMOD – and anybody who is denying that is LYING. (Yes, sabotagedCRISPR-Cas9 can be used for gene BLOCKING – see later.)
CRISPR – and any other future tools like it – are used to splice genes. Remember that old term, “gene-splicing”, that seems to have disappeared for some reason?
Yeah – that is where we are.
If you read this article, you will see that, in early 2019, gene-splicing vaccines were NOT that far away, and were being openly tested on animals. YOU KNOW they had already been tested on humans, but – hey – you can’t say it, even though you know it’s true.
So where does Chemical & Engineering News figure into this?
C&EN was basically taken over by climate commies in the first stage of subversion of American science to the climate agenda and eventually “Demmunism”. Journalists! From there, it only got worse. As one can expect, during the Trump administration, every single issue was a protest against the Trump presidency. Worse still, during COVID insanity, cubic miles of water were carried for the COVID commies and the ChiNazis, to whom the American Chemical Society seems somehow eternally indebted, just like everybody else in science.
Scientists are such chumps.
But when Joe Biden “won”, C&EN had an orgasm, and THAT issue is a beauty.
Water-carrying in this issue includes (and I go into self-discrediting territory here to make a TIP to the right people):
justify top-down government control of science
bring back those ChiCom and other student spies
double-down on Earth abiotic life boot-up to distract from [COUGH]
COVID, COVID, COVID!
back-handed shill for Indian dependence on China for chemicals
Black Chemists Matter! (They do, but damn it, can you be less obvious?)
We love Joe Biden and President Harris!
Military must be “greener”!!!
VARIANTS! (But still, this is excellent reporting.)
MOAR COVID!
Pollutant cooling overstated, so GLOBAL WARMING IS BACK!!!
Neutral article on drug reshoring (I’m impressed!)
Biden HFC Treaty!
Biden scientific integrity guidelines ordered! (you may puke now)
Biden reviews everything about EPA! Hooray!
Massive fraudulent scientific paper bust! (Chinese authors not mentioned, of course)
[Black] Communities push for say in environmental regulations!
Will Biden and Harris outlaw common pesticide on the ropes? Please? Hooray!
This was the warning shot, right here. It was the LAST item in the “Biden-Harris Love-Fest”, but it is clearly what’s for dinner.
BIDEN-APPROVED GENE-EDITING IS COMING. That’s the message.
But what follows, interestingly, is a bit different.
What’s interesting here is that this food animal genmod stuff was being SHIFTED from FDA to USDA, and this shift was being pushed by the TRUMP administration and Sonny Perdue, against the wishes of FDA. So it may not be what it appears to be, and the TITLE here may amount to some AOC lipstick on some pork that the Bidenistas don’t actually like.
It seems to have something to do with the meat market and keeping up with other nations. Could that mean China? Complicated business. Do I trust Sonny Perdue? Yes. Do I trust Trump? Yes. Whatever they did here, I trust, but I’d love to know the deep story. Maybe Gail has some insight here.
GENTHER doesn’t make an appearance until the March issues, but DEEP LIFEMOD gets a shocker cover on the very next issue, if you know what to look for.
The message here is two layers. The ostensible top layer is pretty much like what Kary Mullis intended with PCR – in this case, “let’s use ribosomes to make stuff!” That isn’t a particularly scary message – that’s pretty much what any kind of agriculture is – we’re just taking control of it down at the ribosome to “extend things”. But the hidden message layer is just as sneaky and cunning as what they DID with Kary’s baby – to abuse it for “outcome-controllable” diagnosis and even politics, in evicting Trump.
“Retooling the ribosome” is what you do to create life that’s – well – different. Want to increase the alphabet of life? To go from the planet-portable ASCII of our current amino acids and nucleic acids to EXTENDED ASCII – and maybe even someday UNICODE? This is the key step.
We are KNOCKING AT THE DOOR. And you can’t do nothin’ about it.
That is the psychological message of this issue of C&EN.
So – even though this is nothing explicit – nothing to be worried about right now – perfect demonstration of the difference between me and Dr. Carrie Madeij on how we’re reacting to transhumanism – I still agree with her that we need to WAKE UP on these topics, where others are going with careless abandon, thanks to DOMINION voting systems and their knowingly, intentionally bad security choices.
Let’s compare the deception here to climate change.
One of the problems with what I call phony anthropolitical global warming is that “solving” it doesn’t really solve OUR immediate problem of ice ages and intermittent dangerous global cooling (the reality), but it DOES solve a future problem of long-term SOLAR warming on this planet. Whether that’s OUR problem or “somebody else’s”, it’s not a problem NOW. Thus, it seems that the problem of global warming is duplicitously framed.
Even if the deception is beneficial as in – people with billions of years of planetary experience think an ice age now is helpful against the background of eventual heat death – the societal costs of the LIES are adding up.
Likewise, I feel that the push to advance genetic modification of humans is duplicitously framed. The phony pandemic – the push to GENVAX – the denial of hydroxychloroquine – it all STINKS.
Back to C&EN.
In the March 1, 2021 issue, there is coverage of an mRNA drug company, Orna Therapeutics, being launched with an 80 million dollar war chest – which is a buck for every year of Nancy Pelosi’s life, per MTG. This venture is being spun off of MIT research.
It is explicitly stated that this mRNA therapeutics venture is going forward because of the success of the SCAMDEMIC vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna. And who is investing in Orna? A whole bunch of drug companies, including Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis.
TOLDJASO.
Big Pharma GOT RID OF TRUMP and forced a human experiment on all of humanity, while using leftist politics to force buy-in by as many people as possible. WE CAN SEE IT.
Just because they could do it, does not make it right. SHAME on them all, including the CHEERLEADERS at Chemical & Engineering News. SHAME.
Now, jump forward to the March 15, 2021 issue, and we tie this all together with CRISPR.
Gene therapy relieves pain in mice CRISPR-based method could treat chronic pain
What scientists at Navega Therapeutics did here was actually very cool – they used a BAD version of CRISPR-Cas9 which doesn’t properly snip the gene for a pain receptor, but instead PARKS there and blocks it, to prevent pain in mice. They didn’t do “gene splicing” – they did “gene blocking”. They used adenoviral vectors – kinda like the Johnson+Johnson and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines – to “send in the clowns”. AND IT WORKED. As an independent pain researcher said of the whole thing, “super-exciting paper”.
This is pure research, and it’s actually very cool, and even morally acceptable to people who don’t believe in gene tampering per se but – yeah – it’s all moving forward because they know they can use it on people because of the SCAMDEMIC. The next stop on this one is NON-HUMAN PRIMATES.
Bottom line:Gene therapy is here – it’s coming to your doc soon – and you can’t stop it. Not only that – if you resist too much, they will launch a phony sociobiological event to try to MAKE you take whatever they want.
Welcome to “The Biden-Harris administration – How the new leaders aim to restore science to US governance”, as stated on the February 1, 2021 cover of Chemical & Engineering News.
It’s going to be an interesting ride, no matter what.
Conclusions
I could end on that SOUR NOTE of Branch Covidian and ChiNazi end-zone dancing at COVID-19 half-time. We could all remain AT their game, which is really IN their game. We could run out for CRISPR doughnuts and GMO Pork Sausage and come back to our socially distant seats for the Cuban National Anthem and the “accidental” wardrobe malfunctions.
Or we could get up, walk out, embrace a life which truly respects nature, the universe, and TRUTH ITSELF. We could read some books and magazines, gain awareness of what is happening, and TAKE CONTROL OF THE WHOLE DAMN STADIUM from afar. Maybe not right away, but sooner than we think.
I believe that others have gone where we are now, and sympathize with our plight. Likewise, I believe that higher powers serve THE LORD, and in doing so, will not abandon us to the Evil One.
Freedom, independence, justice and TRUTH are all worth fighting for – and we are NOT ALONE in wanting them.
No matter WHAT you think of any of this technology, or the vaccines…..
I AM WITH YOU.
If I would defend your right to SAY anything, would I not defend your right to LIVE as you wish?
COUNT ON IT.
We will bring SANITY and MORALITY back to this country, and we will do it sooner than many think.
This FEARLESS FRIDAY open thread is OPEN – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA / KAG! / KMAG world (KMAG being a bit of both MAGA and KAG!).
Buffalo protester shoved by Police could be an ANTIFA provocateur. 75 year old Martin Gugino was pushed away after appearing to scan police communications in order to black out the equipment. @OANN I watched, he fell harder than was pushed. Was aiming scanner. Could be a set up?
You can say what you want, comment on what other people said, and so on.
Free Speech is practiced here. ENJOY IT. Use it or lose it.
Keep it SOMEWHAT civil. They tried to FORCE fake Orwellian civility on us. In response, we CHOOSE true civility to defend our precious FREEDOM from THEM.
Our rules began with the civility of the Old Treehouse, later to become the Wolverinian Empire, and one might say that we have RESTORED THE OLD REPUBLIC – the early high-interaction model of the Treehouse – except of course that Q discussion is not only allowed but encouraged, and speech is considerably freer in other ways. Please feel free to argue and disagree with the board owner, as nicely as possible.
Please also consider the Important Guidelines, outlined here in the OLD January 1st , 2019 open thread. Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven.
SPEAK THE FIVE WORDS BOLDLY TO OUR PRESIDENT!
“I AM PRAYING FOR YOU!“
AND WHAT TIME IS IT?
TIME TO….
DRAIN THE SWAMP
Our movement
Is about replacing
A failed
And CORRUPT
Political establishment
With a new government controlled
By you, the American People.
Candidate Donald J. Trump
Also remember Wheatie’s Rules:
No food fights.
No running with scissors.
If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.
This open thread has TWO additional purposes.
FIRST, it is going to be a TEASER for an article on “GuginoGate” – the latter being the FAKE NEWS SCANDAL underlying Trump’s tweet which is cited above.
Let’s look at that more closely…..
Yeah, let’s watch how he holds position on that last swipe, even after the cop shoves him away – WHICH I CONTEND WAS THE DESIRED RESPONSE BY THE POLICE TO SET UP WHAT FOLLOWS!!!!!…..
YUP – the DEFINITIVE ARTICLE on GUGINOGATE is coming!
But now I would like to REMIND everybody about one possible reason WHY Adam Schiff – serial liar and hoaxer – is so utterly HUNG UP on a really stupid idea that might be called “VACCINES CAN DO NO WRONG” – an utterly untenable scientific position, despite all the GOOD that smart, honest, proven and well-tested vaccines – like drugs – have to offer.
Adam Schiff – very wrongly – believes that any position other than “vaccines can do no wrong” is “misinformation“.
HORSEFEATHERS!!!
One of the PROOFS that vaccines can indeed “do harm” is the fact that vaccine candidates are FAILED all the time for such harm.
ANOTHER such proof is that THIS HARM is exactly the principle on which STERILITY VACCINES are based.
Sterility vaccines (or sterilization vaccines – take your pick) are DESIGNED to cause very specific harm that will render people STERILE without otherwise harming them.
It is important to know that significant progress has been made on these things.
First, go HERE to listen to a whistleblower’s report on that progress:
Take it with a few grains of salt, but it still sounds both tenable and authentic to me.
NOW – it BOTHERS people – and I’m one of them – that SCIENCE has been doing a lot of lying lately, and has really earned the name FAKE SCIENCE. It’s not like we can trust everybody in science.
So – some people think the reason nobody is TALKING about sterilization vaccines, but great progress is being made on them, is that EUGENICISTS – like HITLER – are rearing their ugly heads again, and that THEY are the ones pushing SECRET RESEARCH on sterility vaccines.
I mean – let’s face it. Hitler would have MUCH preferred a sterilization vaccine to Zyklon B as a means to “solve the Jewish problem”.
SO, go HERE for Natural News to offer THEIR theory on where this is going.
NOW – I don’t know if Mike is right about the eugenicists plotting to kill blacks, but Margaret Sanger and the Eugenics movement did indeed want to reduce the population of black people – that is very well documented.
And a eugenicist pretty much started World War II, if I recall.
And eugenicists are probably still around, although I think they keep a pretty low profile. But they certainly seem plausible. Enough that people believe science fiction involving such things is “highly likely to happen”.
But killing blacks?
Frankly, if CHINA were driving “sterilization wars”, I would think WHITES would be their primary target, but whatever.
Mike Adams’ view of COVID-19 actually sounds very well-informed to me. Not a lot of speculation there. That’s good. But the bottom line is that the real issue isn’t whether Mike Adams is credible. The real issue is that mainstream science and medicine, after all the literally murderous hate and trickery dropped on hydroxychloroquine from their ranks, are NOT CREDIBLE.
