Who Approved and Upheld These Vaccines? The Covid Second Opinion Forum Held by Ron Johnson vs. the FDA Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC)

A background research post by Gail Combs


PREFACE

by Wolf Moon

It is useful for me to explain Gail’s post – to help you understand the importance of it.

People in government regulation of science and medicine do not make decisions in a vacuum – but they may make their decisions in an artificial atmosphere which is created, composed, and altered by those with the extreme power and ability to CONTROL INFORMATION.

LancetGate was very demonstrative of this ability to control science and medicine.

After watching a variety of FDA decisions under the Trump and Biden administrations, it has become very clear to me that FDA resides in a political and economic crosswinds, highly influenced by many parties with strong expectations and abilities to influence. And yet, the shocking (but welcome) advisory recommendation AGAINST COVID vaccine boosters – then overridden by the political operative Rochelle Alinsky Walensky in CDC – shows how a coordinated injection of honest medicine and common sense into FDA decision-making (THANK YOU, Steve Kirsch!) can sometimes make its case heard – even if only momentarily.

Sadly, it seems to me that Pfizer is back in the driver’s seat again. We thus have to ask WHY.

What Gail has done is to look at one endpoint of the argument (frontline doctors and publishing scientists who have run into the problems), which leads to the other, where we begin to find the reasons why FDA generally decides things in favor of big industry and big government, and not to the benefit of individual patients and doctors.

By looking at the doctors and scientists who supported logical and ethical TREATMENT of COVID-19, and who were wrongly and unethically BLOCKED and DENIED PERMISSION at every point – we can see that undue industry and political influence in NIH, CDC, and FDA are most likely responsible for decisions that make absolutely no sense to truly independent scientists and doctors. The video Gail includes is rather astounding in terms of showing us how much went wrong. What we are now seeing reminds me of science and medicine in the Soviet Union. Absolutely incredible.

What Gail has done here is to “follow the influence” – to show that FDA decision-making has NOT been in a vacuum, precisely because the members of the FDA advisory committee are not truly independent, but are in fact actors for the very same powerful forces that benefit from FDA decisions which are now inscrutable at the doctor-patient frontline.

Perhaps even more astoundingly, the very SYSTEM of NIH, FDA, and CDC seems to be designed, at this point, to leave NOBODY ACCOUNTABLE. Advisory groups and even department responsibilities are created, rearranged, and dismissed, so that NOBODY takes responsibility for mandates that defy logic and even violate the common medical sense of the past.

If something goes wrong in this chaotic system of responsibilities in the wrong places, you either blame everybody or nobody at all. This is why, in my opinion, the entire federal governent had to get rid of Trump.

DIG ALONG WITH GAIL, as she finds the CLUES – first in the testimony of Ron Johnson’s witnesses – then in the backgrounds of members of an important FDA advisory panel.

With that, here’s Gail.


The Covid Second Opinion Forum

It would be nice to let Senator Johnson know we saw this:

CONTACT: https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/contact

Offices – Mail address and Phone: https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/office_locations

MANY THANKS TO GA/FL and Wolf M00n for alerting us to the Covid 2nd opinion Forum

Here’s a must watch – A SECOND OPINION – SENATOR RON JOHNSON FORUM.
Begins at 40:19 – https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html
“Discussion begins around 40 minute mark. Sen. Ron Johnson moderates a panel discussion, COVID-19: A Second Opinion. A group of world renowned doctors and medical experts provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.”
More at https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov

GA/FL

It is five hours long and I went through the whole video. I recommend listening to it as you work on other things since there is not much to watch. It is much better than the speeches at the March Against Mandates.

My, comments posted 1/25/2020:
1:41:50 – 1:50:00 Dr Paul Marik on Remdesivir:
4 million hospitalized 850,000 million died. He says cheap approved drugs could have save 500,000 lives (That is the 1/2 million again that I figured out by a different method.)
He eviscerated NIH/FAUCI.

Fauci Told POTUS Remdesivir was good 10 days in. Researchers Changed the study END POINT to HIDE DEATHS. The OTHER study SHOWING the deaths/toxicity of Remdesivir in Ebola trial was released at 11:00 am JUST before the Afternoon presentation of the corrupted Remdesivir-Covid study that was presented by Fauci to POTUS. (More on this below) He also mentioned U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services gives bonuses to hospital to treat MEDICARE (the old and ‘useless’) patients with this toxic drug.

Steve Kirsch made it clear he thought it was corruption and worse several times.

Incriminating evidence – Steve Kirsch’s newsletter
New VAERS analysis reveals hundreds of serious adverse Events that the CDC and EDA Never Told Us About

3:12:00 MyFreeDoctor (dot)com:
This group treated 150,000 and only lost four.

3:35:00 Dr Peter McCollough talks about vaccines:
Originally there were three different advisory boards during the trials but when it came to the EUA those boards were gotten rid of AND THAT IS WHY CLOT SHOT WAS NOT PULLED IN JANUARY 2021!
Steven Kirsch says right after that there is HARD evidence at least 4 in the CDC/FDA were getting royalties…

4:02:00
The risk increases with each shot. mRna was ENGINEERED to TAMP DOWN RESPONSE to evade ADE BUT it looks like it ALSO tamps down response to viruses, bacteria, and cancer.
New Study Dr Voss out of the Netherlands.
There are too many Dr Voss in the netherlands for me to hunt down the correct one.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=voss%20netherlands&sort=date
(Could be KL Koss since she has papers about the heart and colon and cancer. papers: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Koss+KL&cauthor_id=8943944

4:43:00 Attorney Tom Renz:

He has Dept of Defense Whistleblowers with the data from the D-Med data base. They have taken data ‘snapshots’ over time and it shows THE DATA BASE WAS TAMPERED WITH TO HIDE THE INJURIES TO OUR SOLDIERS!
Senator Johnson Ordered PRESERVE YOUR RECORDS….

January 25, 2022 14:52
Apparently Daniel Horowitz chased down Attorney after the Ron Johonson Senate Hearing for some additional clarifications.
https://thelibertydaily.com/bombshell-cover-up-cancer-diagnoses-in-the-military-rose-over-three-fold-since-jabs-were-introduced/

para59r

5:05:00
Myocarditis and heart Hits 18 to 24 yr old males the worst. up to 50 years 21,000 cases so far.
A lot more good info.

Dr. Christina Parks made comments through out the presentation.

January 25, 2022 20:09
Yes – Dr. Christina Parks has made some excellent points about how differently people with African genetic background react to CV19 AND THE VACCINES.
Ethnicity does matter in medicine – my sister had concurrent dengue fever and malaria and her response was severe and peculiar to a certain ethnicity so….we learned may have some middle eastern/african blood somewhere previously unknown to us.

GA/FL

The Timeline of FDA Decisions

Heading down the Rabbit Hole on Vaccines that Dr Peter McCollough opened.

Emergency Use Authorization — FDA
As background, this gives the laws, who has the authority and the timeline.

TIME LINE:

October 13, 1976 – New York Times:
Swine Flu Program Is Halted in 9 States As 3 Die After Shots
“After the deaths, swine flu vaccinations were halted throughout Allegheny County, which includes Pittsburgh, and the Federal Center for Disease Control sent doctors to investigate….


September 1, 2020 CNN
Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a Covid-19 vaccine now would be ‘colossally stupid’
This is actually a very good article on BAD vaccines and what it can do to the public’s trust.

And then we come to the FDA, the meetings and WHO is on the board.

October 22, 2020
Discussing, in general, the development, authorization and/or licensure of vaccines to prevent COVID-19


 On October 22, 2020, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s (CBER), Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) will meet in open session, to discuss, in general, the development, authorization and/or licensure of vaccines to prevent COVID-19. 

FDA

Those are probably the three boards Dr Peter McCollough talks about. The third was the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee that hold these meetings. Note they are meeting just before the election and it contains ALL three boards.
….

These meetings are AFTER the STOLEN ELECTION but again all three advisory boards are present.

December 10, 2020
Discussing First Emergency Use Authorization Request for a COVID-19 Vaccine


On December 10, 2020, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s (CBER), Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) will meet in open session to discuss Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age and older.

FDA

December 17,2020

Discussing Second Emergency Use Authorization Request for a COVID-19 Vaccine


Agenda
The meeting presentations will be heard, viewed, captioned, and recorded through an online teleconferencing platform. On December 17, 2020, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s (CBER), Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) will meet in open session to discuss Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Moderna, Inc., COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 18 years and older.

FDA

December 15, 2020 updated December 18


The ACIP met last week to review the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and recommended moving forward with its distribution to anyone over age 16. The FDA issued an EUA on Saturday following the meeting and notified the CDC and Operation Warp Speed to coordinate distribution plans. Initial doses were shipped over the weekend. The first round of deliveries will be completed in all 50 states this week…
Pfizer’s initial distribution of vaccines will be given to 21 million health care workers and 3 million mostly elderly people living in long-term care facilities.
As vaccines are deployed, data on potential or delayed side effects will be collected to answer questions that would have been addressed in long-term trials with millions of participants under nonemergency circumstances….

Nat’l Conf. of State Legislators

December 14, 2020, 8:33 PM – Black nurse in New York, Sandra Lindsay, gets the first vaccine.


A month later we get the first Adverse Reaction Reports.
January 18, 2021 – Coronavirus: California calls for pause, investigation after Allergic Reactions to Moderna Vaccine


Biden is installed in the White House and the FDA/CDC does no real investigation. Instead NOTE THE CHANGE IN MEETING MINUTES.


February 26, 2021
Discussing Third Emergency Use Authorization Request for a COVID-19 Vaccine


Agenda
The meeting presentations will be heard, viewed, captioned, and recorded through an online teleconferencing platform. The committee will meet in open session to discuss EUA of the Janssen Biotech Inc. COVID-19 Vaccine for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 18 years and older. <== NO ADDITIONAL ADVISORY BOARDS!
Meeting Materials
FDA intends to make background material available to the public no later than 2 business days before the meeting. <== THIS IS THE INFORMATION people are having to SUE FOR!

FDA

Note there are NO MEETINGS TO DISCUSS DEATHS OR ADVERSE REACTIONS! This is the NEXT MEETING:

June 10, 2021

Discussing Pediatric Use of COVID-19 Vaccines

The Committee will meet in open session to discuss, in general, data needed to support authorization and/or licensure of COVID-19 vaccines for use in pediatric populations.

Meeting Materials
FDA intends to make background material available to the public no later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post the background material on its website prior to the meeting….

FDA

Now we come to the meat, exactly who is at those meetings?


The VRBPAC Advisory Committee

The Committee reviews and evaluates data concerning the safety, effectiveness, and appropriate use of vaccines and related biological products which are intended for use in the prevention, treatment, or diagnosis of human diseases, and, as required, any other products for which the Food and Drug Administration has regulatory responsibility. The Committee also considers the quality and relevance of FDA’s research program which provides scientific support for the regulation of these products and makes appropriate recommendations to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs.

The Committee shall consist of a core of 15 voting members including the Chair. Members and the Chair are selected by the Commissioner or designee from among authorities knowledgeable in the fields of immunology, molecular biology, rDNA, virology; bacteriology, epidemiology or biostatistics, vaccine policy, vaccine safety science, federal immunization activities, vaccine development including translational and clinical evaluation programs, allergy, preventive medicine, infectious diseases, pediatrics, microbiology, and biochemistry.

FDA

Applying for Membership on FDA Advisory Committees

As part of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) ongoing efforts to recruit qualified experts with minimal conflicts of interest who are interested in serving on FDA advisory committees, FDA is requesting nominations for members to serve on its advisory committees….

Conflicts of Interest:

Potential candidates are asked to provide detailed information concerning such matters as financial holdings, employment, and research grants and/or contracts in order to permit evaluation of possible sources of conflict of interest.

FDA

Oooh Boy, they do not sound good. I am digging up and placing here a lot of info on each individual. However I have screened out much much more. What struck me, is out of the sixteen only three do not have major expertise in pediatrics. ALL have ties to NIH/Fauxi or the FDA or the CDC. Some have ties to drug companies and more than one has ties to China. Most are women and three are foreign educated and probably not American born. Out of over 300 million people, you would think they could find Americans.

First a cameo of each of the players, and then if you wish you can look at some of the other information I dug out. If you click on the name it takes you to the information they provided to the FDA, often pages and pages citing the papers they wrote and who they worked for. This is the information I used with some added from other sources.

CAMEOS

DIRECTOR
Prabhakara Atreya, Female connected to Fauci
She has no FDA bio.

Ph.D. biochemistry Memorial University of Newfoundland, in Canada 1987

Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 1989 – 1990 (messing with fiber cell membranes of frog, chick, bovine, rabbit and human lenses)

Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY – Papers 1990 &1995

FDA since 2010 per BIO but actually a paper shows she was working @ FDA in 1999.

NIH paper shows she was at NIH in 1998
Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY – Papers 1990 &1995 (Only 13 papers found)

…..

Chair
Hana El Sahly, M.D.
Baylor College of Medicine
(Woman)

Wrote paper on Remdesivir used by Fauci to trick President Trump. The one referred to by DR. McCullough 

…..

Paula Annunziato, M.D. ***
Vice President and Therapeutic Area HeadVaccines Clinical ResearchMerck

Seems to specialize in Pediatric Vaccines.

Archana Chatterjee, M.D., Ph.D.
Dean Chicago Medical School
(Woman)

specialises Pediatrics Vaccines

Pune University, Maharashtra, India 1979-1983

Army Medical Corps, Military Hospital, Gaya, India, 1985 -1988

She is nationally recognized for her work in vaccine development for human papilloma viruses – think Gardasil. I wonder how well acquainted she is with Gregg Sylvester, below & Bill Gates? – Controversial vaccine studies: Gates and Infertility

…….

CAPT Amanda Cohn, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatrics, Vaccines

Chief Medical Officer – National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases – CDC
The mission
of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) is the prevention of disease, disability, and death through immunization

59 Scientific papers: many authored with Nancy E Messonnier

Time to check the Atlantia graveyards… And I am NOT kidding.

…..

Hayley Gans, M.D. (woman)
Expertise: Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases
Department of Pediatrics
Stanford University Medical Center

Author with a bunch of Chinese with FUNDING from China, using the bogus PCR test to say people who have recovered can catch Covid again and re-infect others. This is WHY natural immunity was never on the table and vaccines were.

….

Holly Janes, Ph.D.
Expertise: Biostatistics
Professor – Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division
Division of Public Health Sciences – Seattle, WA

Holly is a biostatistician working on the design and analysis of vaccine studies, with a particular expertise in HIV prevention and vaccine science. Worked for NIH and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

…..

Michael Kurilla, M.D., Ph.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases, Pathology
Director, Division of Clinical Innovation
National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences
National Institutes of Health (NIH <– He works for Fauci)
Bethesda, MD 20852

….

Myron Levine, M.D., D.T.P.H., F.A.A.P

Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Associate Dean for Global Health – Vaccinology and Infectious Diseases

Center for Vaccine Development – University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore, MD

Faculty at CVD have served in critical leadership roles in U.S. and international research and policy efforts. For example, Neuzil co-chaired the COVID-19 Prevention Trials Network, a research network established by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [ Dr. Fauci was appointed director of NIAID in 1984.] in response to the pandemic. Vaccine research at CVD continues, with an emphasis on reaching the populations most impacted by COVID-19 and testing pediatric vaccines.

University of Maryland

….

H. Cody Meissner, M.D. (Male)
Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics – Tufts University School of Medicine
Director, Pediatric Infectious Disease


H. Cody Meissner, MD, is a leading national expert on childhood vaccinations who consults with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on periodic updates to the recommended immunization schedule for newborns through 18-year-olds. At Tufts Children’s Hospital at Tufts Medical Center he heads the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases…

H. Cody Meissner, MD, Vice Chair (’19)

H. Cody Meissner, MD | Tufts Medical Center

…..

Paul Offit, M.D.

Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

Paul A. Offit, MD is the Director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia as well as the Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology and a Professor of Pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a recipient of many awards including the J. Edmund Bradley Prize for Excellence in Pediatrics from the University of Maryland Medical School, the Young Investigator Award in Vaccine Development from the Infectious Disease Society of America, and a Research Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Offit has published more than 160 papers in medical and scientific journals in the areas of rotavirus-specific immune responses and vaccine safety….

FDA

In 2017, Dr. Offit was a weekly columnist for The Daily Beast.

A look at his recent peer-reviewed papers shows he is targeting vaccine hesitant parents.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Offit+PA&cauthor_id=24011750&size=20

This says it all:

Plotkin SA, Offit PA, Reiss D.: Important New Resource for Clinicians Giving Expert Witness Testimony on Vaccines. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 37(12), Dec. 2018.

To the Editors:

Vaccination is under attack by individuals who occasionally use the legal system to oppose mandatory vaccination laws and in some cases to obtain exemptions for particular children whose parents are opposed to vaccination. During the legal proceedings, as we have witnessed, experts testifying in favor of vaccination may be challenged with references from journals of doubtful quality that oppose vaccination.

To provide important references that discuss and disprove claims made against vaccines, the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia has created a library of references addressing certain safety issues that may be useful as an aid and refresher to clinicians giving expert testimony on the safety of vaccines and to lawyers defending vaccination of children.

The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia legal library may be entered through the web address vaccine.chop.edu/safety-references.

We would be grateful if you could inform your colleagues about the availability of this resource, which should be of great value for experts testifying for vaccination and for clinicians who need to convince parents about vaccine safety. https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Fulltext/2018/12000/Important_New_Resource_for_Clinicians_Giving.42.aspx

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

………..

Steven Pergam, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Medical Director
Infection Prevention
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance — Seattle, WA

He seems to specialize in cancer and immuno-compromised and seems to be the best of a bad bunch, until you see he is tied at the hip to NIH & CDC from 2009 to present as well as to various drug companies.

….

Jay Portnoy, M.D.

Expertise: Consumer Representative (This is the guy representing the public)

Professor of Pediatrics

Medical Director of Telemedicine Section of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, MO

150 papers mainly on allergies. American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology – “…a professional medical association of more than 6,000 allergist-immunologists and allied health professionals…” AND if you search long enough…. You find the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology wrote an Article urging allergists to support more funding for NIH (Fauci)

He is also on a Task Force Paper recommending those with severe egg allergies to go ahead and get the Flu vaccine, just do it at the allergist because “… personnel to recognize and equipment to treat anaphylaxis need to be immediately available…”

….

Andrea Shane, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc.

Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics, Director Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases – Emory University School of Medicine – Atlanta, GA

International exchange fellowship, Children’s Hospital at Montefiore and Beijing Children’s Hospital, Beijing, China October-November, 1999

Lieutenant Commander, United States Public Health Service, 2001-2003;

Inactive Reserve Corps (IRC) 2003-until IRC dissolved in 2010.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis working group, appointed member, 2009-until committee dissolved by CDC in 2011.

01 August 2007- 01 August 2016 Co- investigator, NIH/NIAID/DMID Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU)

influenza vaccine to breastfeeding women trial, DMID#09-007;

…..

Paul Spearman, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Director, Division of Infectious Diseases
Albert B. Sabin Chair in Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Professor, Department of Pediatrics
University of Cincinnati School of Medicine Cincinnati, OH

This guy is a really big heavy weight.

There is cross-over with the lady above, Andrea Shane. Any bets he pulled her in to be his ‘female puppet’ – a good little government soldier?

03/2009-09/2016: Vice Chair for Research Department of Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine

03/2009-09/2016: Chief Research Officer Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta, GA

[Andrea Shane is Attending Pediatrician Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Emory Healthcare Grady Health 2006 – present ]

This guy has a full page of COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS, National and International, and a whole section for NIH Councils and Study Sections AND… NIH/NIAID HIV Vaccine Trials Network – Protocol Chair, HVTN 088 Protocol 2010-present

Not to mention his connections to the drug companies and China.

………

Geeta K. Swamy, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Senior Associate Dean Vice Chair for Research & Faculty Development
Associate Professor, ObGyn, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Duke University, Durham, NC

2004 – 2006 Duke University Associate Faculty Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Division of Clinical & Epidemiological Research

2009 – present Duke University Vaccine Trials Unit Investigator Duke Translational Research Institute Durham, NC

Grants from, NIH-NIAID, GlaxoSmithKline, CDC-NCIRD, ACOG/Merck & Company,

2015

Consultative Workshop: Immunology Research Gaps Related to Maternal ImmunizationBill & Melinda Gates Foundation

WHO Brighton Collaboration Global Alignment of Immunization Safety Assessment in Pregnancy – Chair, Fetal Distress Working Group

Gregg Sylvester, M.D., M.P.H. +
Expertise: Alternate Industry Representative
Vice President – Medical Affairs, Seqirus Inc., Summit, NJ

• Launched Pfizer’s Pediatric and Adult Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine,

Spearheaded science-based rationale to preserve Pfizer’s Prevnar 13 infant schedule in US recommendations

• Launched Merck’s HPV4 vaccine in over 100 countries

• Partnered with community organizations in Delaware to reduce infant mortality, teen pregnancy rates and HIV rates

Created the medical affairs strategy for Merck’s HPV4 vaccine, Gardasil

….

Vaccine Approval For Children

Now, if you have time & stomach, a deeper dive into the people who unleashed the Clot Shot on babies.

DIRECTOR
Prabhakara Atreya, Ph.D.
Division of Scientific Advisors & Consultants
Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research
Food and Drug Administration – Silver Spring, MD

Dr. Prabhakara Atreya, an Indian American scientist is a 10 year veteran at the US Food and Drug Administration which she joined in 2010. Prior to this appointment, Atreya worked at the National Institutes of Health, leading the Office of Scientific Review. She has a PhD in biochemistry, biophysics and molecular biology from the Memorial University of Newfoundland, in Canada. She was one of the team of US regulators and independent experts of Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC). At the time of emergency use authorization for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, she was the Acting Designated Federal Officer of VRBPAC.

LINKED-IN

Thesis:
Atreya, Prabhakara Lakshmi (1987) Conformational aspects of proline hydroxylation in collagen biosynthesis : studies with synthetic peptides. Doctoral (PhD) thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Probable Papers (13):
Affiliation: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington
I think this paper is what Fauci Spotted:
Construction of in-frame chimeric plant viral genes by simplified PCR strategies.
Atreya CD, Atreya PL, Pirone TP. Plant Mol Biol. 1992 Jun;19

Site-directed mutations in the potyvirus HC-Pro gene affect helper component activity, virus accumulation, and symptom expression in infected tobacco plants.
Atreya CD, Atreya PL, Thornbury DW, Pirone TP.Virology. 1992 Nov

Mutational analysis of the coat protein N-terminal amino acids involved in potyvirus transmission by aphids.
Atreya PL, Lopez-Moya JJ, Chu M, Atreya CD, Pirone TP.J Gen Virol. 1995 Feb;76

Her papers then show a move to NIH
Affiliation: Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0720, USA.
The NS1 protein of human respiratory syncytial virus is a potent inhibitor of minigenome transcription and RNA replication.
Atreya PL, Peeples ME, Collins PL.J Virol. 1998 Feb;

And then the move to FDA.
Affiliation: Laboratory of Pediatric and Respiratory Viral Diseases, DVP/CBER, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Respiratory syncytial virus strain A2 is resistant to the antiviral effects of type I interferons and human MxA.
Atreya PL, Kulkarni S.Virology. 1999 Sep 1; (@ FDA)

Role of type I IFNs in the in vitro attenuation of live, temperature-sensitive vaccine strains of human respiratory syncytial virus.
Loveys DA, Kulkarni S, Atreya PL.Virology. 2000 Jun 
 
……..
Her resume STINKS! She has three papers on human respiratory syncytial virus, and a bunch of early papers on cloning and tinkering with plants @ Univ Kentucky and earlier papers messing with fiber cell membranes of frog, chick, bovine, rabbit and human eye lenses @ Wayne State Univ, MI NOTHING ELSE except the Sex Card, Race Card and probably not American born.
……..

These are her picks:

CHAIR:
Hana El Sahly, M.D.
Baylor College of Medicine
May 18, 2020
Hana El Sahly on Remdesivir and the NIH’s Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (Well that answers WHO set up elders for DEATH!)

On May 15, Texas Monthly reported on their conversation with Dr. Hana El Sahly of Houston’s Baylor College of Medicine. In the coming days, she will begin registering hospitalized participants at Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center and Ben Taub Hospital for the second phase of the National Institutes of Health’s Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial, or ACTT. She’s Baylor’s lead investigator for participation in the program, which in its first phase analyzed a randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the investigational antiviral remdesivir. Preliminary findings suggested that patients treated with remdesivir recovered faster than patients who received a placebo, which led to the May 1 announcement that remdesivir would be the first medication to receive FDA authorization for emergency use for COVID-19.
“We found that for patients who have COVID-19 pneumonia bad enough to get them to the hospital, treatment with remdesivir expedites the time to recovery by an average of four days per patient,” says El Sahly…

Hana El Sahly, M.D.

Education

Undergraduate education American University of Beirut, Lebannon Bachelor of Science, 1987-1990Medical education American University of Beirut, Lebannon School of Medicine, Doctor of Medicine, 1990-1994


Scientific Papers (46)


Several presentations on “HIV vaccines”
Fauci must love her:

Review Panels, Committees
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health-sponsored vaccine clinical trial 05-0011; 2006
Reviewer, Loan Repayment Program, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health; 2008
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health-sponsored vaccine clinical trial 08-0009; 2009
Reviewer, Scientific Review Program, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; 2010
Member, Data Safety Monitoring Board, Protein Sciences Corporation vaccine clinical trial PSC-22; 2010
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Healthsponsored study DMID 10-0043; 2011
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health-sponsored study DMID 11-0007; 2011
Reviewer, Scientific Review Program, National Institutes of Health, P01 application “Towards A Universal Influenza Vaccine”; 2012
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health sponsored study DMID 13-0087; 2014
Member, Publications Committee, Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2014-2017
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, Mercia Pharma Inc-sponsored study NOVA MAS-1; 2015
Member of the Food and Drug Administration Vaccine and Related Biological Advisory Committee; 2016
Reviewer, Influenza pre-applications, US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command-Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, 2016
WHAT THE HECK IS THIS!! => Member, ID week program planning committee, 2017-2019

Is this her daughter: Dr. Hana Mohammed Elsahly, MD 28, practicing in Houston, TX?
……

Paula Annunziato, M.D. ***
Vice President and Therapeutic Area Head
Vaccines Clinical Research
Merck

Seems to specialize in Pediatric Vaccines.
Nuv said…

…..

Archana Chatterjee, M.D., Ph.D.
Dean Chicago Medical School
Vice President for Medical Affairs
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
M.B.B.S. (Equivalent to M.D.): Pune University, Maharashtra, India 1979-1983
Army Medical Corps, Military Hospital, Gaya, India, 1985 -1988
Major Scientific Interest: Vaccine development. She forgets to mention her main trial target is infants.

Principal Investigator: Recent Research Projects/Grants
GSK = GlaxoSmithKlinePled Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations & Failure to Report Safety Data – July 2012
(Nice people she worked for.)

Date: 2018-2019 Sponsor: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration For Community Living

Date: 2018-2020 Sponsor: Pfizer A Phase 2, Randomized,Trial ….Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Infants.

Date: 2018-2020 Sponsor: GSK …Study to Assess the Safety & Immunogenicity of Meningococcal Vaccine & 1 Pneumococcal Vaccine when Administered Concomitantly with Routine Vaccines to Healthy Infants.

Date: 2018-2020 Sponsor: GSK … dose-escalation study to evaluate safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals’ respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) investigational vaccine based on the RSV viral proteins F, N and M2-1 encoded by chimpanzee-derived adenovector.. when administered… to RSVseropositive infants aged 12 to 23 months.

Date: 2017-2019 Sponsor: MedImmune ….Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MED18897, a Monoclonal Antibody With an Extended Half-life Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus, in Healthy Preterm Infants. [Are they going to give the infants the RSV?]

Date: 10/2015-10/2017 Sponsor: Merck…, Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Different Formulations of V114 [15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine ] in Healthy Adults and Infants.

Date: 10/2015-10/2016 Sponsor: Astra Zeneca An observational study of RSV hospitalization in preterm infants.

Date: 9/2014-2017 Sponsor: GSK … multinational study … of GSK Biologicals’ MMR vaccine (209762)… compared to Merck (M-M-R®II or VaxPro), as a first dose, both co-administered with Varivax, Havrix (all subjects) and Prevnar 13 (US subset) in healthy children 12 to 15 months of age.

Peer-Reviewed Articles (120)

Appointments:
2020 – Invited to serve on NIH (NCI) Special Emphasis Panel to evaluate grant applications received in response to the RFA(s) with primary focus on HIV-Associated Malignancy Research

2019 to present – Invited to serve as and appointed a member on the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) of the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)

2012 -2019 – Consultant to the US FDA

2014 – Merck Vision 2027 Expert Input Forum on Vaccine Policy

2008 – 2012 – Member, Anti Infective Drug Advisory Committee (AIDAC), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US FDA

2008 -2012 – Invited to serve on the National Vaccine Advisory Boards for Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis Pharmaceutical Companies

2008– Merck Vaccination Service Award, recognition of commitment to improving public health through vaccination.

2006 – Invited member, Sanofi-Pasteur, MedImmune, Abbott Pharmaceutical Companies’ National Advisory Boards

2003 – Invited Session Chair at an International Symposium organized by the Merieux Foundation entitled, “Vaccination in Tomorrow’s Society – New Information Pathways”. Annecy, France

Merieux Foundation …. AND THAT GETS INTERESTING…. WIKI

In October 2004, the FM was the beneficiary of a Franco-Chinese agreement that led to the creation of the Institut Pasteur de Shanghai.…
In 2012, the FM continued its partnership with the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
In 2015, the CAMS-FM partnership founded the Christophe Mérieux Laboratory (CML) at the Institute of Pathogen Biology in Beijing to focus on the study pneumonia and tuberculosis. Researchers at the CML “benefit from and training modules developed by the Emerging Pathogens Laboratory in Lyon”,[5][6] a BSL-4 lab which was also built by the FM in 1999 and since 2005 is now operated by INSERM.[7]

In 2015, the FM participated in the donation by the French government of CIRI’s Biosafety Level 4 expertise to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
In January 2017, a researcher who was financed by the CAMS-FM partnership participated in a study of human rhinovirus and genotype A21…..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fondation_M%C3%A9rieux

WIKI

“Mentorship and sponsorship of faculty and learners has been a hallmark of Dr. Chatterjee’s entire thirty- year career in academic medicine…” LINK [I am sure she has been kissing FauXi’s ass for years to get funding.]
MORE:

….Board certified in general pediatrics and pediatric infectious diseases, she is nationally recognized for her work in vaccine development for human papilloma viruses and in antibiotic resistance. She has completed more than 100 clinical trials and published more than 50 peer-reviewed articles, 23 invited review articles, 17 book chapters and one book.

The first woman and person of color to serve as dean of CMS, Dr. Chatterjee, a native of India, earned her medical degree from the Armed Forces Medical College at Pune University in India and her PhD from the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) in Omaha….

https://www.rosalindfranklin.edu/news/rfu-announces-selection-of-new-dean-for-chicago-medical-school/

…..

CAPT Amanda Cohn, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatrics, Vaccines
Chief Medical Officer
National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) MISSION | CDC
The mission of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) is the prevention of disease, disability, and death through immunization and by control of respiratory and related diseases.

CDC

POSTGRADUATE TRAINING 2004 – 2006 Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC, Atlanta, GA
WORK EXPERIENCE :
3/2019-present Chief Medical Officer (Acting), Vaccine Policy, Preparedness, and Global Health, Office of the Director, NCIRD, CDC
11/2015-present Executive Secretary, ACIP and Senior Advisor, Vaccines Office of the Director, NCIRD, CDC
5/2014-11/2015 Deputy Division Director, Immunization Services Division, NCIRD, CDC
01/2013-05/2014 Acting Epidemiology Team Lead Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases, DBD, NCIRD, OD
06/2006-12/2012 Medical Officer, Epidemiology Team Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Division of Bacterial Disease, NCIRD, CDC
07/2004-06/2006 Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) Officer, Epidemiology Program Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA Assigned to: Bacterial Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, National Immunization Program

Scientific papers: 59 many authored with Nancy E Messonnier
Great titles like:

  1. Multistate Outbreak of Respiratory Infections Among Unaccompanied Children, June 2014-July 2014.
    Conclusions: This respiratory disease outbreak was due to multiple pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 5 and influenza viruses. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations prevented further transmission. Future efforts to prevent similar outbreaks will benefit from use of both vaccines. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27001799/
    [How about CLOSING THE DARN BORDERS!]
  2. Understanding Factors Affecting University A Students’ Decision to Receive an Unlicensed Serogroup B Meningococcal Vaccine.
  3. Compliance with recommendations and opportunities for vaccination at ages 11 to 12 years: evaluation of the 2009 national immunization survey-teen.
  4. Adolescent immunizations and other clinical preventive services: a needle and a hook?
  5. Immunizations in the United States: a rite of passage.
  6. Attitudes, practices, and preferences of pediatricians regarding initiation of hepatitis B immunization at birth.
    ……

Hayley Gans, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases
Professor of Pediatrics
Department of Pediatrics
Stanford University Medical Center


Fellowship: Stanford University School of Medicine (1998) CA

  • Medical Education: State University of New York Syracuse Medical School Registrar (1991) NY
  • Board Certification: American Board of Pediatrics, Pediatric Infectious Diseases (1999)
  • Residency: Stanford University Medical Center (1994) CA
  • Internship: Stanford University Medical Center (1992) CA
  • M.D., SUNY at Syracuse, Medicine (1991)

Fellowship Program Director, Pediatric Infectious Diseases (2006 – 2017)

  • Co-director, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Program for Immunocompromised Hosts, Children’s Hospital at Stanford (2013 – Present)
  • Associate Fellowship Director, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Stanford University Medical Center (2017 – Present)
  • Director, Fellowship Education, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Medical Center (2017 – Present)

Sort of BLAAaaaah until you look at this paper:

Remember her focus is kids.

July 2020 Lancet preprint.
Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Positivity of Infected and Recovered Patients: A Single Center COVID-19 Experience and Potential Implications https://autopapers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3605268

Jia HuangSouthern University of Science and Technology CHINA and 42 other authors with only 7 others not Chinese. The other universities were  Sichuan University, China and Sanford.

https://autopapers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=4257785

And then it REALLY GETS GOOD:

FUNDING STATEMENT: This work was supported by grants from Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (Jia Huang, No. SZSM201812065); Bill & Melinda Gates Foundations (Lei Liu); and from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Jia Huang, No. 81501651)

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS: The authors declare no competing interests.

ETHICS APPROVAL STATEMENT: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology.[CHINA]

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive detection in infected but recovered individuals has been reported. Patients who have recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could profoundly impact the health care system if a subset were to be polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive again with reactivated SARS-CoV-2. We sought to define the kinetics and relevance of PCR-positive recurrence during recovery from acute COVID-19 to better understand risks for prolonged infectivity and reinfection.

METHODS: A series of COVID-19 414 patients, at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China from January 11 to April 23, 2020. Univariable and multivariable statistical analysis of inpatient data were performed to develop an algorithm to predict patients at risk of recurrence of PCR positivity.
[REMEMBER PCR TESTS RETURN MAJOR FALSE POSITIVES – Reiner Fuellmich say this guy Droston isn’t a Doctor at all, but a bull**** artist. Christian Drosten & the Fraud Behind COVID 19 PCR Testing ]

FINDINGS: 16·7% recovered patients with PCR positive recurring one to three times, despite being in strict quarantine. Younger patients with mild pulmonary respiratory syndrome had higher risk of PCR positivity recurrence. The recurrence prediction model had an area under the ROC curve of 0·786.

INTERPRETATION: This case series provides clinical characteristics of recovered COVID-19 patients with recurrent SARS-CoV-2 positivity, despite strict quarantine, at a 16·7% rate. Use of a recurrence prediction algorithm may identify patients at high risk of recurrent SARS-CoV-2 positivity and help understand reactivation and reinfection possibilities to establish protocols for health policy.

LANCET

This is a very important paper because it REFUTES NATURAL IMMUNITY and green lights MORE DRACONIAN ECONOMY KILLING ‘Health Measures’

……

Holly Janes, Ph.D.
Expertise: Biostatistics
Professor — Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division
Division of Public Health Sciences – Seattle, WA

Dr. Holly Janes is a biostatistician working on the design and analysis of vaccine studies, with a particular expertise in HIV prevention and vaccine science. She also develops and applies statistical methodology for evaluating biomarkers for risk prediction and optimizing treatment decisions

Current Projects

Leadership for the Statistical Data Management Center of the HIV Vaccine Trials Network

Statistical methods for HIV prevention efficacy trials

Statistical methods for human challenge studies

Statistical evaluation of biomarkers for making treatment decisions https://www.fredhutch.org/en/faculty-lab-directory/janes-holly.html

HONORS, AWARDS, SCHOLARSHIPS:

2008 Travel Award, AIDS Vaccine Conference, Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

2000 Cardiovascular Biostatistics Training Grant, National Institutes of Health

EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES:

Associate Editor Journal of the National Cancer Institute (2015-2018)

Diagnostic and Prognostic Research (2016-present)

Statistical Communications in Infectious Diseases (2019-present)

RESEARCH FUNDING:

Active Funding:

2 UM1 AI068635 (PI: Gilbert P) 01/01/2014 – 11/30/2020 5.4 Calendar NIH/NIAID SDMC HIV Vaccine Trials Network

2 R01 CA152089 (PI: Janes H) 07/01/2010 – 11/30/2021 4.8 Calendar

NIH/NCI

Statistical Methods for Evaluating Markers for Treatment Selection

Interventions for disease treatment and prevention can potentially be made more cost-effective by using markers to identify in advance the individuals most likely to benefit from the treatment, and thus avoid treating those unlikely to benefit. [Rationed Health Care anyone?]

Lots more Mostly NIH and then this goodie:

38744 7/1/2006-4/30/2012

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Vaccine Immunology Statistical Center (VISC) The VISC will provide 1) statistical and study design support for pre-clinical vaccine performance trials, 2) centralized data management services for the standardized evaluation of vaccine candidates, 3) development of new statistical methods for cross-species correlates-of-protection analysis.

Role: Faculty Statistician

BIBLIOGRAPHY Publications in Refereed Journals

1. Pepe MS, Janes H, Longton G, Leisenring W, Newcomb P. Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(9):882-90.

2. Janes H, Pepe M, Kooperberg C, Newcomb P. Identifying target populations for screening or not screening using logic regression. Stat Med. 2005;24(9):1321-38.

.

.

12. McElrath MJ, De Rosa SC, Moodie Z, Dubey S, Kierstead L, Janes H, Defawe OD, Carter DK, Hural J, Akondy R, Buchbinder SP, Robertson MN, Mehrotra DV, Self SG, Corey L, Shiver JW, Casimiro DR. HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity in the test-of-concept Step study: A casecohort analysis. Lancet. 2008;372(9653):1894-905. PMCID: 2774110.

13. Pepe MS, Feng Z, Janes H, Bossuyt PM, Potter JD. Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: Standards for study design. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(20):1432-8. PMCID: 2567415.

.

.

21. Barnabas RV, Wasserheit JN, Huang Y, Janes H, Morrow R, Fuchs J, Mark KE, Casapia M, Mehrotra DV, Buchbinder SP, Corey L. Impact of herpes simplex virus type 2 on HIV-1 acquisition and progression in an HIV vaccine trial (the Step study). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;57(3):238-44. PMCID: 3446850.

22. Fitzgerald DW, Janes H, Robertson M, Coombs R, Frank I, Gilbert P, Loufty M, Mehrotra D, Duerr A. An Ad5-vectored HIV-1 vaccine elicits cell-mediated immunity but does not affect disease progression in HIV-1-infected male subjects: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial (the Step study). J Infect Dis. 2011;203(6):765-72. PMCID: 3119328.

And many more. I am sure Fauci loves her.

……

Michael Kurilla, M.D., Ph.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases, Pathology
Director, Division of Clinical Innovation
National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences
National Institutes of Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) is one of 27 Institutes and Centers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The focus of NCATS is to advance the science of translation, which is the process of turning observations into interventions to improve health.

National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences

……

Myron Levine, M.D., D.T.P.H., F.A.A.P
Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Simon & Bessie Grollman Distinguished Professor
Associate Dean for Global Health
Vaccinology and Infectious Diseases Center for Vaccine Development
University of Maryland School of Medicine

Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health – UMB …

University of Maryland School of Medicine

For more than a year, researchers at the Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health (CVD) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM) have been working tirelessly on COVID-19 research, helping to pave the way for the use of vaccines and therapies that are being administered across the country.

Under the leadership of CVD director Kathleen Neuzil, MD, MPH, FIDSA, the Myron M. Levine, MD, DTPH, Professor in Vaccinology at UMSOM, researchers quickly pivoted decades of vaccine and infectious disease research experience toward combating this deadly virus, which continues to impact millions of people around the world.

Faculty at CVD have served in critical leadership roles in U.S. and international research and policy efforts. For example, Neuzil co-chaired the COVID-19 Prevention Trials Network, a research network established by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID Dr. Fauciwas appointed director of NIAID in 1984.] in response to the pandemic. Vaccine research at CVD continues, with an emphasis on reaching the populations most impacted by COVID-19 and testing pediatric vaccines.

CVD experts have launched an expansive grassroots campaign to educate the community and reach those who have been hit the hardest by this terrible virus, including members of the Black and Brown communities, the elderly, and those with underlying health risks.

Our CVD team has worked tirelessly and meticulously to advance COVID-19 vaccines and to ensure they are reaching the most affected populations,” Neuzil said. “Our work continues as we begin testing vaccines in children and investigate booster vaccines to address the risk of COVID-19 variants.”  [Like this Dude is neutral?]

Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health (CVD …

Our research, surveillance and vaccine development focuses on four key areas: Enteric Diseases, Malaria, Influenza and Respiratory Diseases, and Emerging Pathogens.

Overview

Our faculty and staff are experts in the field of global health and vaccinology, and they are dedicated to improving global health by conducting innovative, world-leading research in Baltimore and around the world. Our key mission is to harness the power of vaccines to prevent disease and save lives in the most vulnerable populations.

…….

H. Cody Meissner, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Professor of Pediatrics
Tufts University School of Medicine
Director, Pediatric Infectious Disease
Tufts Medical Center
POST GRADUATE TRAINING

1973 – 1975 Internship and Residency Boston Floating Hospital New England Medical Center Boston, MA

1975 – 1977 Research Associate Public Health Service National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institute (NICHD) Bethesda, MD Parent Agency is National Institutes of Health (Fauci)

2008 – Present Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

2010 – Present Massachusetts Vaccine Purchasing Advisory Council

2017 – Present National Vaccine Advisory Committee, United States Department of Health and Human Services

2017 – Present Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, United States Department of Health and Human Services

AWARDS

Massachusetts 2017 Recipient of the CDC Childhood Immunization Award

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Striking a Balance Between Individual Rights and Community Benefit.

Meissner HC, Nair N, Plotkin SA. JAMA. 2019 Jan 29


The Importance of MMR Immunization in the United States.

Perrone O, Meissner HC. Pediatrics. 2020 Aug


Principles of Vaccine Licensure, Approval, and Recommendations for Use.

Pickering LK, Meissner HC, Orenstein WA, Cohn AC. Mayo Clin Proc. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

H. Cody Meissner, MD | Tufts Medical Center

H. Cody Meissner, MD, is a leading national expert on childhood vaccinations who consults with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on periodic updates to the recommended immunization schedule for newborns through 18-year-olds. At Tufts Children’s Hospital at Tufts Medical Center he heads the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases

….

Paul Offit, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Professor of Pediatrics
Division of Infectious Diseases
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

Paul A. Offit, MD is the Director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia as well as the Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology and a Professor of Pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a recipient of many awards including the J. Edmund Bradley Prize for Excellence in Pediatrics from the University of Maryland Medical School, the Young Investigator Award in Vaccine Development from the Infectious Disease Society of America, and a Research Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Offit has published more than 160 papers in medical and scientific journals in the areas of rotavirus-specific immune responses and vaccine safety. He is also the coinventor of the rotavirus vaccine, RotaTeq, recommended for universal use in infants by the CDC….

FDA

In 2017, Dr. Offit was a weekly columnist for The Daily Beast.

Papers:

2018

Plotkin, S.A., P.A. Offit, and P. Bégué, : Vaccine mandates in France will save lives,”  Science 359: 283-284, 2018.

Plotkin SA, Offit PA, Reiss D.: Important New Resource for Clinicians Giving Expert Witness Testimony on Vaccines. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 37(12), Dec. 2018.

To the Editors:

Vaccination is under attack by individuals who occasionally use the legal system to oppose mandatory vaccination laws and in some cases to obtain exemptions for particular children whose parents are opposed to vaccination. During the legal proceedings, as we have witnessed, experts testifying in favor of vaccination may be challenged with references from journals of doubtful quality that oppose vaccination.

To provide important references that discuss and disprove claims made against vaccines, the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia has created a library of references addressing certain safety issues that may be useful as an aid and refresher to clinicians giving expert testimony on the safety of vaccines and to lawyers defending vaccination of children.

The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia legal library may be entered through the web address vaccine.chop.edu/safety-references.

We would be grateful if you could inform your colleagues about the availability of this resource, which should be of great value for experts testifying for vaccination and for clinicians who need to convince parents about vaccine safety. https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Fulltext/2018/12000/Important_New_Resource_for_Clinicians_Giving.42.aspx

2017

Offit, P.A.: “Commentary: Science Denialism Isn’t New to the Trump Administration,”  Philadelphia Inquirer December 22 2017.

Offit, P.A.: By Regulating Homeopathic Remedies, FDA Holds ‘Modern-Day Snake-Oil Salesmen’ Accountable,  Philadelphia Inquirer  December 28 2017.

2013

Williams SE, Rothman RL, Offit PA. Schaffner W, Sullivan M, Edwards KM. A randomized trial to increase acceptance of childhood vaccines by vaccine-hesitant parents: a pilot study. Academic Pediatrics (2013) 13: 475-480.

A look at his recent papers shows he is targeting vaccine hesitant parents.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Offit+PA&cauthor_id=24011750&size=20

…..

Steven Pergam, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Medical Director
Infection Prevention
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance — Seattle, WA

He seems to specialize in cancer and immuno-compromised and seems to be the best of a bad bunch. But then we look at this:

SPECIAL NATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES:

2009–2010 Independent Safety Monitor, NIH/NIAD, DMID Influenza Protocols: 09-0039, 09-0043, 09-0047, 09-0053, and 09-0054: H1N1

2010–2011 Independent Safety Monitor, NIH/NIAID, DMID Protocol 09-0002: Comparison of the Safety and Immunogenicity of Lyophilized IMVAMUNE® (1×108 TCID50) versus Liquid Formulation IMVAMUNE® (1×108 TCID50) Administered by the Subcutaneous Route and a Lower Dose Liquid Formulation IMVAMUNE® (2×107 TCID50) Administered by the Intradermal Route in Healthy Vaccinia-Naïve Individuals (Bavarian Nordic)

2011–2013 Member, Data and Safety Monitoring Board: Effect of tenofovir on genital HSV shedding: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial

2015-present Member, Zoster Working Group, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services

2016-present Member, Abstract Selection Committee, Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)

2016-2017 Independent Safety Monitor, NIH/NAID, DMID Protocol 16-0117: Comparison .of High vs. Standard Dose Flu Vaccine in Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

.

.

.

15. RESEARCH FUNDING

Current: Washington Vaccine Alliance (WAVA) Pilot Award (PI: S. Pergam) 10/1/13-6/30/20 Interactions between gastrointestinal microbiota, Influenza vaccine responses and respiratory viral infections in a large cohort of clinic employees

BAA-NIAID [Fauxi Director]-DMID-NIH-AI (PI: M. Ison; Subcontract PI: Pergam) 5/1/16-4/30/20 Phase II Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Nitazoxanide in Acute and Chronic Norovirus in Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Solid Organ Transplant Recipients 1U01AI132004-NIAID (PI: N.Halasa; Subcontract PI: Pergam)

7/5/2017-6/30/20 High vs. Standard Dose Flu Vaccine in Adult Stem Cell Transplant Recipients 1R01AI134808-NIAID (PI: D. Fredricks)

.

.

Completed:

NIH/NIAID T32 AI007-044 (PI: W. Stamm) 9/1/05-2/1/07 Host Defense Training in Allergy and Infectious Diseases

.

.

Industry Sponsored Clinical Trials:

Chimerix, Inc. (PI: Pergam) 2016-current An Intermediate-size, Expanded Access Protocol to Provide Bincidofovir for the Treatment of Serious Adenovirus Infection or Disease, Protocol CMX001-35”

6/17/2017-present Prior Industry Trials Merck, Sharp & Dohme Co., Inc (PI: Pergam)

2012-2015 Pergam, SA – CV Page 15 A Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of V212 in Recipients of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplants (HCT)

Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* (PI: Pergam) 2013-2015 A Phase IIIb, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Demonstrate the Safety & Efficacy of Fidaxomicin for Prophylaxis against C difficile-Associated Diarrhea in Individuals Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplants (HCT) *formerly Optimer pharmaceuticals

KRT16/26/21, 01:40 PM

$ACXP In December 2014, Merck ($MRK) paid US$9.5 billion for Cubist ($CBST) largely to obtain marketing access to agents daptomycin and fidaxomicin. https://stocktwits.com/symbol/CBST

Chimerix, Inc. (PI: Pergam) 2016 A Multicenter Non-Interventional Study to Obtain Retrospective Data for Subjects Previously Diagnosed with Adenovirus Infection to serve as Matched Historical Controls for Study CMX001-304; Protocol No. CMX001-305

Chimerix, Inc. (PI: Pergam) 2015 – 2017 A Phase 3, Open-label, Multicenter Study of the Safety/Tolerability and Efficacy of Brincidofovir (CMX001) for the Prevention of Adenovirus (AdV) Disease in Subjects with Asymptomatic AdV Infection at Risk of Progression and for the Treatment of Subjects with Localized or Disseminated AdV Disease

Chimerix, Inc.

 All that shimmers isn’t … enhanced by lipid conjugate technology. Chimerix is a development-stage biopharmaceutical company, dedicated to accelerating the advancement of innovative for patients living with cancer and other serious diseases. Its two clinical-stage development programs include dociparstat sodium (DSTAT) and brincidofovir (BCV). DSTAT, is a glycosaminoglycan derivative of heparin with known anti-inflammatory properties and BCV is an oral antiviral in development for the treatment of smallpox.

 2505 Meridian Pkwy Ste 100 Durham, NC,

https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.chimerix_inc.a1878daaef1b59d25a1d2e8876c4b4bf.html

Chimerix, Inc.’s key principal is Michael A Sherman. Chimerix, Inc. has 54 employees

https://wallmine.com/people/8557/michael-a-sherman

…..

Jay Portnoy, M.D.
Expertise: Consumer Representative (This the guy who is supposed to represent the interests of the Public.)
Professor of Pediatrics
Medical Director of Telemedicine Section of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, MO

Offices and Board of Directors:

American Board of Allergy & Immunology (ABAI). 2014-present.

Vice President, American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 2005-6.

Board of Directors, Black Healthcare Coalition. 2006-2009. [He is WHITE]

Editorships and Editorial Boards

Regional Editor, World Allergy Organization Journal. 2008 to 2012.

Section Editor, Annals of Allergy and Asthma. Appointed 2002 to 2005

Editor, Current Opinion on Allergy & Asthma. Issue on Pediatric Allergy. 2004 and 2005

Editor, Current Allergy and Asthma Reports. Issue on Pediatric Allergy. 2001-2013

Editorial Board, Allergy Watch. 1998-2001.

Editorial Board, Annals of Allergy and Asthma. 1994 to 2006

Editorial Board, Current Allergy Practice. 1993 to present

Other Appointments

FDA advisory panel (CBER), Allergenic Extracts.

2017-present FDA advisory panel (CDER). Respiratory and allergy drugs.

2010-present FDA advisory panel (CBER), Allergenic Extracts.

2005-2010 Special Emphasis Panel. T-cell Epitopes. NIAID. 2011.

https://www.fda.gov/media/105541/download

The guy has 151 papers mainly dealing with allergy so I am not going to look at all of them.

He seems to work with Environmental Allergens Workgroup. Also with American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology – “…a professional medical association of more than 6,000 allergist-immunologists and allied health professionals…” He is a Fellow, American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI) …. if you search long enough…. You find an AAAAI Legislative Action article urging Allergists to support Fauci’s funding.

NIAID, NIEHS, NHLBI, MCAN Workshop Report: The Indoor Environment and Childhood Asthma: Implications for Home Environmental Intervention in Asthma Prevention and Management

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), and Merck Childhood Asthma Network (MCAN) sponsored a joint workshop to discuss the current state of the science with respect to the indoor environment and its effects…

Adverse reactions to vaccines practice parameter 2012 update

…..Thus although patients with a history of mild reactions to egg ingestion (hives only) can receive their vaccine in a primary care provider’s office, those with a history of more severe reactions (cardiovascular, respiratory, or gastrointestinal symptoms) should receive the influenza vaccine in an allergist’s office. In both cases, personnel to recognize and equipment to treat anaphylaxis need to be immediately available, but the allergist’s office affords additional expertise in this area should it be required…..

…..There has been a great deal of additional information published over the past year demonstrating the safety of influenza vaccination in patients with egg allergy. Health care providers should no longer withhold the vaccine from any patient with egg allergy. In an update to recommendations made in the last year, it is now considered safe for patients even with a history of a severe egg allergy to receive influenza vaccination…..

No worries, we will revive you when you almost die of anaphylaxtic shock, it is utmost importance for us to jab you with a shot that is probably useless so we can get paid our bonus.
…..

Andrea Shane, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc.
Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics
Director Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Emory University School of Medicine – Atlanta, GA

Joint appointment:
Assistant Professor of Global Health Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University 01 September 2013-present

Military or Government Service: Lieutenant Commander, United States Public Health Service, 2001-2003; Inactive Reserve Corps (IRC) 2003-until IRC dissolved in 2010.
……
The United States Public Health Service is a collection of agencies of the Department of Health and Human Services concerned with public health, containing eight out of the department’s eleven operating divisions. The Assistant Secretary for Health oversees the PHS.

WIKI

ALSO:

OASH oversees the Department’s key public health offices and programs, a number of Presidential and Secretarial advisory committees, 10 regional health offices across the nation, and the Office of the Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. https://www.hhs.gov/ash/index.html
……

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis working group, appointed member, 2009-until committee dissolved by CDC in 2011.

Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) National Global Public Health Committee (NGPHC), appointed member 2010-2013.

World Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (WSPID), Board Member and member of the Education Committee representing the Pediatric Infectious Disease Society (PIDS), appointed 2017; term through 2019.

[THIS IS WHERE SHE HAS A LOT OF POWER]
Manuscript reviewer:

American Journal of Infection Control, 2001-2003
Clinical Infectious Disease Journal, 2003-present
Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2003 – present
Pediatrics, 2006 – present
Journal of Pediatrics, 2006-present
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2003-present
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 2003 – present
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 2006 – present
Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal, 2006 – present
Neonatology, 2008 – 2010
Journal of American Medical Association, 2009 – present
JAMA Pediatrics, 2013 – present
Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 2013-present
Pediatric Research 2017-present
Clinical Therapeutics, 2017-present
Faculty of 1000 (f1000), Public Health and Epidemiology section, post publication peer review of publications, 2009 -2011. [WTF???]
Pediatric Infectious Disease section with creation of the section, 2011-2014.

Honors and Awards:
International exchange fellowship, Children’s Hospital at Montefiore and Beijing Children’s Hospital, Beijing, China October-November, 1999

Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Crisis Response Service Award, 2002

Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Outstanding Unit Citation, 2002

National Foundation for Infectious Diseases (NFID) Advanced Vaccinology Course Travel Grant to attend ADVAC 9, Annecy, France, 2008

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Special Recognition, H1N1 influenza research, 2010

Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Award for Excellence in Partnering-Domestic to NETEC (the National Ebola Training and Education Center)…. This award recognizes programs’ initiative and effectiveness through establishing and sustaining a strategic partnership with government, private sector, volunteer, or nonprofit organizations, 24 March 2016.

Contracts:

Co- investigator, NIH/NIAID/DMID Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU) – Emory University School of Medicine. Role: Site PI on rotavirus vaccine cross-over trial, DMID #08- 0017 and influenza vaccine to breastfeeding women trial, DMID#09-007; site co- investigator on other trials. Salary support, 01 August 2007- 01 August 2016….

………….

Paul Spearman, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Director, Division of Infectious Diseases
Albert B. Sabin Chair in Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Professor, Department of Pediatrics
University of Cincinnati School of Medicine Cincinnati, OH

This guy is a really big heavy weight. There is cross-over with the lady, Andrea Shane above. Any bets he pulled her in to be his ‘female puppet’ – a good little government soldier?

11/2005-09/2016: Professor and Division Director Nahmias-Schinazi Research Chair Pediatric Infectious Diseases Department of Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine
11/2005-09/2016: Associate Director for Pediatric Studies Emory Vaccine Center Atlanta, GA
03/2009-09/2016: Vice Chair for Research Department of Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine
03/2009-09/2016: Chief Research Officer Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta, GA

[Andrea L. Shane is Attending Pediatrician Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Emory Healthcare Grady Health 01 August 2006 – present ]

This guy has a full page of
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS:

a. National and International:


NIH Councils and Study Sections Chair, NIH ZRG1 AARR-E (41)
December 2016 Member, NIH ZRG1 AARR-P (02)
December 2016 Chair, NIH SEP: ZRG1 AARR-K (02)M; AIDS and related research SEP
August 2016 Chair, NCI Board of Scientific Counselors, Site Visit Team, Review of HIV DRP, Frederick, MD
July 2016 Chair, NIH SEP: ZDE1; Approaches to Eliminate HIV and Opportunistic Pathogens from Oral Reservoirs
November 2015 Chair, NIH SEP: ZRG1 AARR-E; AIDS and AIDS-related
July 2015 Chair, NIH SEP: Basic Research on HIV Persistence
March 2015 Chair, NIH/NIDCR Review Panel on HIV and Oral
March 2015 Opportunistic Pathogens
.
.
.

NIH/NIAID HIV Vaccine Trials Network
Protocol Chair, HVTN 088 Protocol 2010-present
Chair, Chiron/Novartis Products Development Team 2000-2007
Chair, Wyeth Products Development Team 2001-2007 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 049 Protocol 2002-2007 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 056 Protocol 2002-2006 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 061 Protocol 2003-2005 Member, HVTN Phase I-II Committee 2002-2005 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 088 Protocol 2010-present
NIH/NIAID/DMID Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit Co-Principal Investigator, Emory VTEU site 2007-present
Protocol Chair, VTEU 0008 Protocol 2009-2014
NIH/NICHD-Westat/NIAID IMPAACT Network Principal Investigator, Emory IMPAACT site 2014-present
.
.
.
CONSULTANTSHIPS:
Chiron, HIV Vaccines Development Team, Emeryville, CA 2003, 2004
Wyeth, HIV Vaccine Programs, Pearl River, NY 2003, 2004

EDITORSHIPS AND EDITORIAL BOARDS: [Again this is where a lot of power lies.]
Member of Editorial Board, Journal of Virology
Member of Editorial Board, Virology
Member of Editorial Board, Current HIV Research
Academic Editor, PLoS One

MANUSCRIPT REVIEWER: [There is that POWER again]
Journal of Virology (numerous, 1995-present)
Virology (numerous, 1998-present)
Current HIV Research (2001-present)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Biochemistry (2005, 2006)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Traffic (2005, 2006, 2007, 2013)
Ad Hoc reviewer, JAIDS (2004, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015)
Ad Hoc reviewer, JBC (1997-present)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Leukocyte Biol (2000)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Vaccine (2000-2016)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Virus Research (2005, 2012, 2012, 2013)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Nature Structural Biology (2005)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PLOs Medicine (2006, 2007, 2008)
Ad Hoc reviewer, J Mol Biol (2007,2012, 2015, 2016)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PNAS (2007, 2008, 2009,2012, 2013, 2014)
Ad Hoc reviewer, JCB (2007, 2008, 2010, 2011,2012, 2013)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PLOs One (2008, 2009, 2010,2011,2012, 2013, 2014) 6
Ad Hoc reviewer, Cell Host and Microbe (2008-present)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Nature Medicine (2009, 2011,2012, 2016)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PLOs Pathogens (2009-present) Ad Hoc reviewer, J Immunology (2010, 2011, 2013) Ad Hoc reviewer, Retrovirology (2011-present)
.
.
GRANT SUPPORT:
a. Active Support

  1. Federally funded:
    NIH R01 AI058828: Role of Vpu in HIV Particle Assembly. Funded since 2004, currently in no-cost extension with competing renewal under review.
    NIH R01 GM111027-17A1: Viral and Cellular Determinants of HIV-1 Assembly. Funded 9/16/2013-8/31/2017 (Principal Investigator). $200,000 initial period; $800,000 direct costs.
    NIH R01AI11863: Mucosal Protection against HIV Generated by PIV5 Priming and VLP Boosting. Funded 4/01/2014-8/31/2018 (Principal Investigator, Multiple PI grant). $351,366/yr.
  2. Private foundation funded:
    None presently.
  3. Industry Contracts:
    None presently

b. Previous Support:
NIH R01HL125042: HIV-induced Redox Stress and the Alveolar Macrophage as a Resistant Reservoir. Funded 7/01/2014-6/30/2018 (Principal Investigator, Multiple PI grant). $686,584/yr; relinquished upon relocation to Cincinnati.
NIH K12 HD072245: Atlanta Pediatric Scholars Program. Funded 04/01/2011-11/30/2016 (Program Director). $324,000/yr.
HHSN275201300003C: Westat/NICHD Contract- IMPAACT Network; Pediatric and Adolescent HIV/AIDS Research Program at Emory University. Funded 9/01/2014-8/31/2019 (Site Principal Investigator). $450,000/yr estimated.
NIAID-DMID-NIH AI2012144: Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units (VTEU). Funded 9/13/2013-9/12/2020. (Co-Principal Investigator). $4-5M/yr estimated. 8
NIH R21 AI098592: HIV-specific B cell repertoire in humans following cross-clade immunization. Funded 7/01/2012-6/30/2014 (Principal Investigator). $150,000 initial period; $275,000 direct costs.


NIH R01 AI090656: Broadly-reactive antibodies against chimeric virus-host antigens. Funded 06/14/2010-05/31/2014 (Co-investigator).

I wonder if he knows Ralph Baric??


NIH U01 AI069418: HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Unit. Funded 2/01/2007-11/30/2013 (Coinvestigator). HHS N272200800005C: Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units. Funded 11/01/07- 10/31/14 (Co-Director), $2,494,361/yr.
NIH U01AI78407 : Clonal Analysis of the Human B Cell Response to HIV. Funded 2/01/08-01/31/13 (Co-Investigator), $150,000/yr (Emory component); $750,000 total.
NIH RO1 AI40338: Viral and Cellular Determinants of HIV-1 Assembly. Funded since 1994; (Principal Investigator). $250,000 initial period; $1,150,000 total- now transitioned to GM111027 (active, above).
NIH R01 CA27834: Genetics of Primate “D” Type Retroviruses. Funded 09/24/07- 11/30/12 (Co-investigator), $250,000/yr, $1,250,000 total.
NIH R01 AI084834: Defining Neutralization Breadth in HIV-positive serum. Funded 9/01/2009-8/31/2011 (Principal Investigator), $250,000 initial period, $500,000 total.

NIH R21 AI65312: Pseudovirion Formation by Live Vector HIV Vaccines. Funded 06/01/2006-05/31/2008 (Principal Investigator), $150,000 initial period; $300,000 total.

NIH R01 AI067101: Novel Assays for Inhibitors of HIV Assembly. Funded 6/15/2005- 5/31/2008 (Principal Investigator), $200,000 initial period; $550,000 total.
NIH U01 AI47985: HIV Vaccine Trials Units. Funded 06/00-05/05. $1,438,628 initial period; $7,637,877 total.
NIH P30 AI054999: Vanderbilt-Meharry Developmental CFAR. Funded 05/01/03-04/30- 06 (Co-investigator), $528,468 initial period; $1,633,442 total.
NIH R29 AI40338-01A1: Membrane Binding and Transport of HIV-1 Pr55Gag. Funded 03/97-03/2002 (Principal Investigator). $ 70,000/ year; $350,000 total.
NIH R21 AI44369 (Innovation Grant): Development of Enhanced HIV-1 Pseudovirion Vaccines. Funded 07/99-06/01(Principal Investigator). $140,000/ year; $260,000 total.
NIH R55 CA83527-01A1: Induction of KSHV replication by HIV-1. Funded 03/00-02/02 (Principal Investigator). $80,000 total.
.
.
.
NIH R01 AI52007: Development of Enhanced HIV-1 Pseudovirion Vaccines. Funded 06/2002-05/2007 (Principal Investigator), $225,000 initial period, $1,125,000 total.

NAI113678, GlaxoSmithKline: An open-label, multicenter, single arm study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intravenous zanamavir in the treatment of hospitalized adult, adolescent, and pediatric subjects with confirmed influenza infection. Funded 10/02/12- 05/01/15. Principal Investigator.
P903-23, Cerexa: A multicenter, randomized, observer blinded, activ-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline vs. comparator in pediatric subjects with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Funded 01/01/2013-12/31/2014. Principal Investigator.
Merck Contract: Protocol 007: A Probe Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of a Three-dose Regimen of the Ad5 Gag Vaccine in Healthy Adults. Funded 04/01-12/02, $113,000 total (Principal Investigator).
Merck Contract: Protocol 012: A Probe Study of the Safety, tolerability, and Immunogenicity of the Ad5 HIV-1 Gag Vaccine. Funded 07/01/01-06/30/2003, $114,000 total (Principal Investigator).
Merck Contract: Protocol 016: A phase I dose-ranging study of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the Merck trivalent adenovirus serotype 5 HIV-1 gag/pol/nef vaccine in a prime-boost regimen in healthy adults. Funded 05/01/03-04/30/05, $117,000 total.
Basic Research Grant, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation: Pseudovirion formation by live vector HIV vaccines. Funded 03/01/02-02/28/2004, $180,000 total.
.
.

LECTURESHIPS, SEMINAR INVITATIONS, AND VISITING PROFESSORSHIPS:
.
.

  1. Invited speaker, Peking University Department of Biomedical Engineering, Beijing, May 2015: “HIV-1 replication in macrophages”
  2. Invited speaker, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Beijing, May 2015: “Intracellular trafficking of the HIV envelope glycoprotein”

…………

Geeta K. Swamy, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Senior Associate Dean Vice Chair for Research & Faculty Development
Associate Professor, ObGyn
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Duke University, Durham, NC

2004 – 2006 Duke University Associate Faculty Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Division of Clinical & Epidemiological Research

2009 – present Duke University Vaccine Trials Unit Investigator Duke Translational Research Institute Durham, NC

2010 – 2018 Duke University Director Duke Perinatal Research Center Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Durham, NC

2012 – present Duke University Associate Professor Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Durham, NC

2013 – present Duke University Human Vaccine Institute Investigator Durham, NC

2016 – 2017 Duke University Associate Dean for Regulatory Oversight & Research Initiatives in Clinical Research Durham, NC

Professional Awards and Special Recognition

2008 NIH Young Investigator Award Perinatal Research Society Meeting, Santa Fe, New Mexico
2010 NIH – NIAID Special Recognition for H1N1 pandemic
2013 and 2014 “Outstanding Reviewer” (Top 10%), Obstetrics and Gynecology
2014 “Outstanding Reviewer” for Vaccine

RESEARCH

Active Grants:
NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Units (MFMU) 4/7/11 – 3/31/21

NIH-NICHD (Swamy) Principal Investigator Participation as a clinical site in the NICHD sponsored MFMU Research Network to investigate treatment strategies for common yet unresolved obstetric conditions through large multicenter collaborative trials

Past Grants:
Health Works for Women, NIH Summer Research Fellowship, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, 1994

PiiiTCH Study-Prevention of Influenza in Infants by Immunization of Their Household Contacts (CDC, Walter) Co-Investigator

NIH-NIAID (HHSN272200800057C, Swamy) Duke Site Principal Investigator
Randomized, Double-Blind Trial on Safety & Immunogenicity of Inactivated Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in Pregnant Women

NIH-NIAID (HHSN272200800057C, Swamy) Duke Site Principal Investigator A Phase II Study in Pregnant Women to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Unadjuvanted Sanofi Pasteur H1N1 Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Administered at Two Dose Levels

GlaxoSmithKline (Swamy) Cost-effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy An epidemiological study to develop and validate a model for estimating the costs and outcomes related to seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy for both mothers and infants through age 6 months.

Charles Hammond Research Fund (Gray) Mentor Assessing Decision Making & Acceptance of H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Administered in a Research Setting In Pregnancy

CDC-NCIRD – 1U01IP000190-01 (Swamy) Principal Investigator Effectiveness of a Vaccination Program in the Community ObGyn Setting The main objective of this 2-year project is to conduct a clinic-based study to develop and assess the effectiveness of a vaccination program for adolescent and adult women in the community Ob/Gyn setting.

ACOG/Merck & Company Research Award on Immunization (Fortner/Swamy) Mentor/Principal Investigator Compliance with Vaccination in the Obstetrical Setting with Novel H1N1 and Seasonal Influenza Retrospective review of births occurring in Durham, North Carolina during the 2009-2010 influenza season to evaluate influenza vaccination practices during the novel H1N1 pandemic.

Charles Hammond Research Fund (Swamy) Principal Investigator Association of Circulating Mitochondrial DNA Content and Preterm Birth Among Black Mothers

NIH-NIAID (HHSN272200800057C, Swamy) Duke Site Principal Investigator A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial on the Safety and Immunogenicity of Seasonal 2010-2011 Inactivated Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in Pregnant Women
.
.
Vaccine & Treatment Evaluation Units 9/16/13 – 9/15/23
NIAID (HHSN272201300017I, Walter and Swamy)
Co- Principal Investigator Participation as a clinical site in the NIAID sponsored VTEU Network to conduct clinical trials of vaccine and treatments for infectious diseases

Contract PI for the following active trials
 A Phase I, Double-Blind, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of NTM-1632 vs Placebo Administered Intravenously in Healthy Adults

 Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Colonization and Disease Among Pregnant Women: A Historical Cohort Study

 A Phase I Cohort-Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial in Healthy Adults to Assess the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of a Monovalent Inactivated Influenza A/H5N8 Virus Vaccine Administered Intramuscularly at Different Dosages Given With or Without AS03 or MF59 Adjuvants: Assessment of Immunological Responses and Lymphocyte Interplay

 A Phase II, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of 5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel Administered Intravaginally for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis

 A Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Dose Escalation Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated West Nile Virus Vaccine, Hydro Vax-001, in Healthy Adults

 An Opportunistic Study to Evaluate the Population Pharmacokinetics of Beta-lactam Antibacterials in Adults Including Elderly Subjects (POPS_SILVER)

 A Population Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate Disposition of Azithromycin and Ertapenem in Pregnant Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery After Failed Labor (POPS_CAN_DO)

Targeted Reduction of Antibiotics Using Procalcitonin in a Multi-center, Randomized, DoubleBlinded, Placebo-Controlled Non-Inferiority Study of Azithromycin Treatment in Outpatient Adults with Suspect Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) and a Procalcitonin (PCT) Level of ≤0.25 ng/mL (TRAP-LRTI)

Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Group-Sequential Study to Determine the Immunogenicity and Safety of a RSV F Nanoparticle Vaccine with Aluminum in Healthy 3rd Trimester Pregnant Women; and Safety and Efficacy of Maternally Transferred Antibodies in Preventing RSV Disease in their Infants Novavax, Inc. (Swamy) 12/1/15 – 7/31/19

Principal Investigator Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) 9/29/15 – 9/28/18 Clinical Study of the Safety of Simultaneous Administration of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine (Tdap) and Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV) in Pregnant Women CDC (HHS200-2012-53663, Swamy) Principal Investigator
.
.
.
GlaxoSmithKline Speaker Services, 2009 – 2012

NIH-NIAID Division of Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Working Group on the Enrollment and Safety Assessments of Pregnant Women in Clinical Trials of Drugs and Vaccines, 2010 to 2015

National Vaccine Advisory Committee – Maternal Immunization Working Group – 2014 to 2016

Appointed Member, February 2017 to present
HPV Working Group, February – June 2018

Consultative Workshop on Immunology Research Gaps Related to Maternal Immunization – Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, May 25-26, 2015

WHO Brighton Collaboration Global Alignment of Immunization Safety Assessment in Pregnancy (GAIA) – Chair, Fetal Distress Working Group – 2015

Independent Data Monitoring Committee, GlaxoSmithKline, Inc. – RSV vaccines for the protection of children, 2015 to 2017

Data Safety Monitoring Board, Randomized Controlled Trial of Influenza Vaccine and Meningococcal Vaccine in Pregnant Malian Women and Their Infants Up To 6 Months of Age, Sponsor: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, 2011-2016

………….

Gregg Sylvester, M.D., M.P.H. +
Expertise: Alternate Industry Representative

Vice President – Medical Affairs
Seqirus Inc., Summit, NJ

Physician | Public Health Expert
Pharmaceutical Executive Expert in vaccine preventable diseases, pediatrics and population health.

Career Highlights
• Head of Medical Affairs for Seqirus, a CSL company
Launched Pfizer’s Pediatric and Adult Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, as well as Meningococcal B vaccine in the USA
Launched Merck’s HPV4 vaccine in over 100 countries, presented to numerous National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs), public health and medical societies
• Partnered with community organizations in Delaware to reduce infant mortality, teen pregnancy rates and HIV rates

Professional Experience
SEQIRUS, a CSL company Summit, N.J Vice President, Medical Affairs 2016 – present
• Responsible for the strategy and implementation of Medical Affairs plan
• Ensures appropriate use of Seqirus’ influenza vaccines
• Overseas Phase IV research and presents data to NITAGs and other key stakeholders.

PFIZER VACCINES Collegeville, Pa
Vice President, Medical and Scientific Affairs: Americas 2013 – 2016
Spearheaded science-based rationale to preserve Prevnar 13 infant schedule in US recommendations
• Successfully achieved an adult Prevnar 13 recommendation from US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice
• Accelerated launch of groundbreaking Meningococcal B vaccine to accommodate urgent public health need

Global Head of Medical Affairs for Pediatric Vaccines 2010 – 2013
• Global Medical Lead for Pfizer’s Pediatric vaccine, Prevnar 13
• Created medical strategy for Prevnar 13, an asset exceeding over $5 billion in revenue
• Created innovate systems to improved scientific exchanges in a complex, global environment

MERCK VACCINES West Point, PA
Global Head of Medical Affairs for Adolescent Vaccines 2005 – 2010
• Created the medical affairs strategy for Merck’s HPV4 vaccine, Gardasil
• Spokesperson for all Merck vaccines
• Traveled extensively throughout the world presenting to governmental officials, regulatory agencies and public health/medical congresses

CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM Greenville, DE
Medical Director, Eugene DuPont Preventive Medicine & Rehabilitation Institute 2001 – 2005
• Led Preventive Medicine for Delaware’s largest health care organization
• Expanded the community-based health programs, serving more than 50,000 people/year

DELAWARE HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES New Castle, DE
Cabinet Secretary 1997 – 2001
• Reported directly to Governor of the State of Delaware
• Managed the largest state agency, with more than 5,000 employees and an operating budget of ~$1 billion
• Implemented Medicaid Managed Care and Children Health Insurance Program (sCHIP) in Delaware State

Health Officer 1995 – 1997
• Led Delaware’s Public Health Division
• Formulated Public Health policies and supervised programs addressing high infant mortality rates, teen pregnancy rates, and low childhood immunization rates
• Promoted to Cabinet Secretary within one year

Chief of Community Health & Director of Maternal & Child Health 1993 – 1995
• Directed the development and implementation of community-based public health programs for the state of Delaware
• Managed an annual budget of $30,000,000 and 330 public health professionals

Selected Board Positions
IMA World Health: Chairman of the Board: 2017-2018;
Board Member: 2013 – present

DONORS: The majority of IMA World Health’s projects are funded through grants from generous public funding agencies and foundations.
CORUS INTERNATIONAL
◦ IMA World Health | Corus World Health
◦ Lutheran World Relief
◦ CGA Technologies ==> https://www.cgatechnology.com/
◦ Ground Up Investing
◦ LWR Farmers Market Coffee

Selected Honors and Awards
Merck Global Human Health Awards – 2007 & 2006 Winner: Franchise of the Year; 2006 Winner: Best Support of International Markets and 2008, 2007 & 2006

Education & Training Fellowships:

  • Public Policy – Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation, assigned U.S. Senate, Washington, DC
  • Epidemic Intelligence Service – Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Atlanta, GA
  • General Preventive Medicine Resident – Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD
  • Pediatric Intern, Resident and Chief Resident – Children’s Hospital of Buffalo – State University of New York at Buffalo School of Medicine, Buffalo, NY
  • Master of Public Health – Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore,
  • MD Doctor of Medicine – Albany Medical College, Albany, NY
  • Bachelor of Arts – (History) – Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY
  • Veteran Status Commissioned Officer, United States Public Health Service: Rank – Commander – 1990 -1993

Summary

These are the people who have no problem giving an unvetted vaccine to children and pregnant women before the safety data is available. After all, they have been doing it on a smaller scale most of their careers.

-Gail Combs


GC/wm (written/edited)

DEAR KAG: 20220121 – The Pub is OPEN / The Anti-Saline Theory and The Toxic Batch Problem

The Pub is OPEN!

Tonight is a special night. We invite ALL SCIENTISTS to come down to the bar for TWO HOURS, and listen to one scientist appeal to our LOGIC and our COMMON SENSE on the TOXIC BATCH PROBLEM.

ALL WHO WISH are invited to sit down, drink in hand, and watch – but it is especially important that ALL SCIENTISTS see this.

It is my contention that if ALL scientists in the world – on this planet – watch this video that I will show you, then the entire WORLD will be QUICKLY AWAKENED to the reality of some kind of systematic problem with the current COVID vaccines – some kind of problem which is evidenced by toxicity showing up with certain batches.

But more about that later.

Right now, come into the bar and find a comfy spot.

While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.

Though we are not especially good at mixing tasty drinks, we can stir some occasional thoughts into a compelling report, argument, recollection, or proposition.

And with that barest promise, we begin.


On the Jukebox

The rare live version of a song rarely found on any bar jukebox – enjoy!

Psalm 118:19-24

19Open to me the gates of righteousness, that I may enter and give thanks to the LORD.

20This is the gate of the LORD; the righteous shall enter through it.

21I will give You thanks, for You have answered me, and You have become my salvation.

22The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.

23This is from the LORD, and it is marvelous in our eyes.

24This is the day that the LORD has made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.


Christmas Spirit

We are going to stretch out Christmas longer than your neighbor who never takes down their Christmas lights.

Enjoy this reminder of how special it was to have the Trumps in the White House.

Will they be back?

STAY TUNED!!!

And now, the rules of the pub.


HOUSE RULES

God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.

Now, back to business.


AMEN!

(#FJB = Free the January Brothers)


Current Art On The Wall

We opened this week’s shipment, and there was a note on top of the contents that said:

“DANGER: STEAMPUNK”

Looks like a real Pandora’s box to me!

Sure enough, the very next thing we found was MONDAY’S LEFTOVERS.

Mmmmmmmmm. Remember – if the can isn’t actually bulging, you can ignore the date!

Click it! The music seems useful for viewing the remainder of the art!

MOAR COWBELL GEARS!!!

Yeah, I’m enjoying this timeframe-loosening absinthe of sorts.

Indeed, absinthe per se seems to be a meme in steampunk.

Look for GREENPUNK as a subgenre of STEAMPUNK.

OK – one more image and then back to reality.

LOL. Nope. That’s not it.

Let’s try another.

AYE-YI-YI. That’s not it, either. I get the sentiment, but I tend to think the devil’s in certain details of the genre, and – as always in the art world – one must proceed with caution.

Although I do have a story about a fantastic dream you may have heard. In some ways, it was the opposite of steampunk, but it had a certain similar quality of alternate reality about it.

Let’s try one more.

Hey – that’s not steampunk! That’s REALPUNK.

I’ll let Steve tell us all about it.

In the meanwhile, we take leave of the infinitude of artistic imagination, and find ourselves back at the concrete.

Or so one might think!


And now our feature presentation

The Anti-Saline Theory and The Toxic Batch Problem – Did Somebody Actually Contaminate Lots of the Vaccines?


I never really thought that I might be defending Big Pharma – in whole or in part – at this point in the multiple scandals of the COVID-19 Plannedemic.

Maybe “defending” isn’t the right word. Maybe “presenting a potentially somewhat exonerating theory” IS the right phrase.

In fact, I don’t even know WHO I’m exonerating, or or that matter, WHO I’m accusing. Likewise, I’m not even sure who the TARGETS of the perpetrators in this “theory” actually are.

However, this is not a “conspiracy theory” – something which is generally certain of perpetrators, victims, and motives.

This is a CRIMINAL THEORY. This is a theory which allows us to begin to examine an apparent crime, in order to determine perpetrators, victims, and motives. It’s a theory which may even be wrong.

I ask all of you to briefly set aside prejudices, which is often necessary to do when evidence needs to be viewed as potential exoneration. Feel free to bring your prejudices and prior theories back AFTER you have looked at these possibilities, because you will need to compare theories, and your current favorites need to CONTEND with what I’m proposing here.

Thus, we begin.


The Saline Theory

The SALINE THEORY – which many regard as a criminal theory, and which others regard as a “conspiracy theory”, contends that the reason some people have either NO REACTION or ALMOST NO REACTION to the “clot shot” – meaning all the standard Western COVID-19 vaccines – is that those people are being given medical saline solution instead of actual coronavirus vaccines.

The proposed motives for this, generally speaking, are either to spare particular individuals from the problems of the vaccines, OR to statistically reduce the numbers of people being KILLED or INJURED by the vaccines to acceptable levels.

Now, in full disclosure, I have been generally, if quietly, rather critical of the saline theory, despite the fact that I am very skeptical of Big Pharma in general, and even more skeptical of Pfizer and Moderna.

Why am I skeptical of the theory? Basically, because it doesn’t really change most vaccines. In a sentence, vaccines are DESIGNED to approximate saline.

In the history of vaccines, the GOAL has always been to literally approach the state of “injecting people with saline” – meaning not much of anything is given, and nothing bad happens.

Thus, an ideal vaccine – and in practice most good vaccines – basically do nothing except grant immunity, which until recently was always expected to be inferior to “natural” disease-conferred immunity.

Let me point out AS AN ASIDE right here that the industry lost megatons of credibility by letting the media trot out nonsense about vaccine immunity being better than disease-conferred immunity, allegedly negating centuries of medical knowledge. Foolish to abandon the truth on that one. Clearly the result of Big Pharma now having the upper hand against Big Med, thanks to Big Finance, and the willingness of Big Media to tell any lie. But I digress.

The point is simple. We EXPECT normal, good vaccines to have very few adverse events – so rare that we rarely hear about them – and that people basically ARE getting saline.

In other words, people generally can’t tell the difference between a good vaccine, a “bad because too weak” vaccine, and saline.

THAT’S THE POINT – that the REALITY of rare adverse events is expected to MATCH our experience of almost never hearing about or experiencing first, second, or third-hand, that somebody had a problem with a vaccine.

I myself went through life NEVER connecting a vaccine to any personal injury – that is, until I got over 30 years of flu shots, religiously, but then switched to my dominant shoulder for no particular reason, and experienced subsequent NOTICEABLE inflammatory issues which were very likely connected to the vaccine. All that being said, I was much older at that point, and older people ARE more likely to experience inflammation of joints as part of getting old. Indeed, this didn’t stop me from getting the flu shot for a number of more years – KNOWING that the vaccine might be responsible.

SO – bottom line – I’m not at all skeptical of vaccine injury, from sore arms up to death.

But I remain skeptical of the saline theory – for the stated reasons.

I never throw anything OUT completely – but I have been quite skeptical that there might be ANY kind of conspiracy – even a very realistic one – to replace weak “do-nothing” vaccines that the industry has spent DECADES making, and is quite good at making, with saline that does almost the same thing.

And INDEED – bear the opposite in mind. Bad things happen to people who get placebos, “because math”. And more than that, bad things happen to people who get saline, “because injection”. It’s extremely rare, but it DOES happen. This is an acknowledged truth of Anthony Fauci’s Holy of Holies, the placebo-controlled double-blind study. That’s why researchers factor out the difference which comes simply from “doing the test”.

But the fact is simple. Saline is generally pretty damn safe to inject, because it does nothing. A good vaccine, likewise, does nothing but provide some degree of immunity – hopefully lifelong, but with a number of years generally being acceptable, depending on the vaccine.

SO – if you tell me somebody got saline – I will tell you that they got a “good vaccine”, and we’re left with only some very difficult science to tell which of us is right.

However, all of that has a problem.

A HUGE problem.

The problem is summed up by the fact that almost everybody in the English-speaking world recognizes the term “clot shot” as a grim, joking nickname for the COVID-19 vaccines.

That didn’t happen by accident. Admittedly, it’s an injection for preventing or pre-treating a clotting disease by generating immunity TO a clotting protein WITH that same clotting protein, or something very similar to it. BUT STILL…..

In practice, this is NOT a harmless vaccine. No amount of propaganda changes that.


The Anti-Saline Theory

So what is the ANTI-SALINE THEORY?

The anti-saline theory, based on something called the toxic batch problem, is roughly a mirror image of the saline theory. It thus contends that some of the coronavirus vaccines were the opposite of non-toxic saline which could NOT harm people, and were, in fact, loaded with something nasty which caused illness and death.

Possible motives are likewise mirror images of the saline theory – to either harm certain people, or to INCREASE the number of injuries and deaths from the vaccines.

NOW – let me be clear. In the absence of the “potential evidence” of the toxic batch problem, I would be every bit as skeptical of the anti-saline theory as I am of the saline theory.

Even for a bad, risky, side-effect-prone vaccine, blaming the still-generally-infrequent side-effects on anything BUT the vaccine itself would seem foolhardy. We have MANY “more risky” vaccines for nasty tropical diseases, from yellow fever up to Ebola, which we generally ONLY give to people at high risk of actually getting the disease, because the vaccines may be a LESSER RISK than the disease, but they are an INCREASED RISK over most vaccines.

We normally don’t need to postulate that the cause of that higher risk is adulteration due to a new cause or perpetrator, when we have the vaccine itself and the vaccine makers, presumably fighting the risk but possibly not succeeding as well as we would like, as our primary suspects.

So how does the toxic batch problem change all that?


The Toxic Batch Problem

First, a reflection. A bit of a warning. Something to prepare you.


At the various stages where one understands pieces of this problem, the revelations really cannot be “unseen”. And yet, the fact that this problem WAS unseen by SO many for SO long, raises questions about whether or not we are just now seeing the edges of something which has been with us for far longer than we realized.

I know that sounds a bit fantastic, as well as euphemistic and even a bit “code”, but now you understand why so many people who have gained deep knowledge of problems with the COVID vaccines, have gone through various emotionally jarring moments of realization.

Something is NOT RIGHT, and yet there seems to be INTENTION behind the condition.

SO – if you get HIT by this sort of realization as we are going along, just know that you are not alone.

OK, back to work. Ah, yes. The toxic batch problem.


I can sum it up as this.

Normally, one expects that a consistently produced pharmaceutical has a VERY wide range of reactions in those to whom it is given, BUT that this statistical range of responses (you can imagine a bar graph, a pie chart, a curve, or a whole bunch of all of them) will stay roughly the same from BATCH TO BATCH.

Stated simply, we expect the variation BETWEEN sets of variations to be SMALL, CLOSE, PREDICTABLE, and REPRODUCIBLE.

This is simply the “law of large numbers”. You flip a thousand pennies. I flip a thousand pennies. It’s very unlikely that we’ll get exactly the same numbers, but BOTH OF US will be close to 500 heads and 500 tails. Any deviation from this will be a nice bell curve, perfectly explainable by statistics.

Try any “batch” of pennies – it will be close to 50:50 heads-to-tails because of the consistency of pennies.

The toxic batch problem is that adverse events for the COVID-19 vaccine batches violate this – and in a HUGE WAY.

A small fraction of the batches (about 5%) are STRIKINGLY TOXIC relative to all the other batches.

The differences are too big, the harmless group is too large, the nasty group is too small, and there are additional patterns that are not random and should not be there.

Yes, there will be variation in the exact numbers of deaths and injuries from batch to batch, “because statistics“, but that variation should be small, natural, centered, and understandable mostly in terms of mathematics. If there IS a big difference in the numbers between the batches, then there has to be some kind of systematic difference – most likely either in the contents of the batches, or in the administration of the batches.

Let’s look at the latter first.

As an example of an administration difference, if you give one batch to kids, and another to seniors, you expect differences. However, if the batches are BIG, and they’re used in a lot of different places, and the groups of people those places serve are large and diverse, then the differences from administration will vanish.

And even if those differences DON’T vanish – in FACT, even if you INTENTIONALLY give one batch to kids and another to seniors, those differences cannot be as big as what was observed.

Another administration difference would be to use some batches ONLY for first injections, and others ONLY for second injections.

Again, we do expect differences there, but not nearly as big as what is observed.

IN FACT, the difference between the “good, nearly harmless batches” (doesn’t that sound like saline?) and the BAD batches is SO big, that it is NOT EXPLAINED by ANYTHING seen in the Moderna and Pfizer trials.

THIS is one of our first clues that something is actually wrong with the contents of those toxic batches.

Now – let’s look at the possibility of a difference in contents.

Could it be that the vaccines are “going bad” and turning into something more poisonous?

Yes, this is possible – BUT the fact of the matter is that when drugs degrade, they almost invariably become “less active”, not MORE active – and certainly never MORE active by orders of magnitude.

Rocks just don’t “roll uphill” by themselves.

In fact, there is a great argument you will see later, made about the COVID-19 vaccine data, as compared to the flu vaccine data, which points out that if you remove all the “bad batches” from the COVID-19 vaccine data, it looks almost exactly like the flu shot.

BASICALLY, SALINE.

Like a normal vaccine is supposed to look.

Now, hopefully, you not only understand why I called this the “anti-saline theory”, but you are also “seeing certain things that you cannot unsee”.

Because YES – something is definitely wrong with those batches.

Even if you don’t accept that the majority of batches are “harmless”, something is terribly wrong with the rest.


But before I get into talking about possible reasons as to WHY these “bad batches” are different, I want to thoroughly convince you that they ARE different and that it’s NOT NORMAL.

I want to give you a brief introduction to the toxic batch problem as seen by the people who found it, examined it, and first told the world.


A Pharma Exec & Researcher Examines the Data

We begin with a video of a man who appears to me to be very typical of the scientists that I knew during my career. He does not appear crazy, loony, mentally ill, psychopathic, or even irrational.

He seems, if anything, like somebody who has witnessed institutional madness descending upon their professional world. You know – like what happened to scientists in Russia in the early 1900s, and in Germany and Italy in the 1930s.

As I listened to this guy, he made scientific sense, just like any seminar speaker, invited lecturer, or even an interviewer for student job prospects from a drug company.

In fact, I believe that if most scientists listened to him, they would BELIEVE HIM.

There is something *apparently* wrong with certain specific batches of the COVID vaccines from three companies that were used globally AND specifically in America. And according to the speaker, a retired drug industry executive and research scientist, this difference cannot be random – it must be adulteration of some kind.

Just watch and see what you think.


LINK: https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Mike-Session-86-en:0


Now – let me summarize.

The most key and salient point is that vaccine side effects vary strongly by batch number – and in a way that the drug companies MUST understand to be REAL and PROBLEMATIC. The variation is NOT merely statistical from a quality-controlled product. It is systematic – meaning it has a CAUSE other than randomness. It is not necessarily intentional (IMO), but it is an OBVIOUS problem.

There is also some argument over how batch toxicity varies across time and batch number – I will leave THAT for the next videos.

The point which the speaker, Dr. Yeadon, made which struck me hardest, was the simple but powerful idea that the individual responses of recipients to a vaccine batch can vary wildly, BUT that the statistical array of responses will NOT vary significantly between batches – that it CANNOT vary – UNLESS there is some REAL, SIGNIFICANT, CONTENT DIFFERENCE between the batches.

The alternative, in my opinion, would be that the batch differences are administration-based – e.g., that batches primarily used for SECOND administrations would have much higher adverse events.

I’m not wed to that thought – but it is an alternative that is every bit as troubling as content differences, and negates the entire strategy of “boosterism”. I also tend to doubt it, both because it does not explain the magnitude of the difference, and is also statistically very unlikely. Content differences just seem more likely to me.


The People Who Found The Toxic Batch Problem

NEXT, I want to deepen the explanation of what Dr. Yeadon was describing. Yeadon provides drug industry credibility to the idea that batch differences are real and almost certainly content-based. They don’t look right to somebody with industry experience.

But NOW we need to explore possible explanations for those differences, based on a closer look at the differences themselves.

SO – next, I want to show you some additional videos and web pages that drill down into the “toxic batch problem”.

We’ll start with the “secondary reporting” and then get to the data itself.

In this video, Stu Peters and Dr. Jane Ruby, who I criticize routinely when they edge toward clickbait, are doing an AMAZING job of reporting on a group of investigators who studied the batch differences. This is excellent journalism. These two can only be as good as their material, but WOW – they have quality material here.


LINK: https://www.brighteon.com/9a45a7a0-e260-4a6c-a251-2b4c139dd211


Now, follow that up with an even deeper examination of the toxic batches.

Jump to 12:50 to continue the discussion. Jane Ruby ends at about 19:00. At 20:00 (to 32:12) it picks back up again with a member of the investigatory group, Team Enigma, who is a pharmaceutical industry bio-statistician. She adds a different perspective on how SMALL any group poisoning the vaccines might be.

This doesn’t require a grand conspiracy of many people. It might involve only a few dedicated and highly skilled saboteurs.


LINK: https://rumble.com/vs59wj-live-hackers-reveal-deadly-jab-lot-numbers-horrific-pfizer-teen-trial-data-.html

Now, let’s look at one of the original presentations of data by Team Enigma.


LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4HlIyBmOEJeY/

Points made in this video:

  • dosages of pharmaceuticals are normally highly controlled
  • consistency and purity are also normally highly controlled
  • COVID vaccines can be readily and correctly compared to flu vaccines
  • flu vaccines are consistent and low in adverse events
  • COVID vaccines are NOT consistent, and vary widely between harmless and highly toxic
  • toxic batches are too wide-spread – problems like refrigeration loss cannot be responsible

Now – here is an EXTREMELY compelling video, which shows in great detail the DIFFERENCE between the “harmless batches” and the “toxic batches”.

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6xIYPZBkydsu/

Pay special attention to the following ideas:

  • most batches (roughly 80%) are almost completely harmless
  • the bad batches produce up to (and in MANY cases) a thousand times more adverse reactions
  • when viewed geographically in the United States, the bad batches affect every state in America

The latter point proves the generality of the effect – that local differences can’t account for the toxicity of the particular lots. If anything, the high distribution of the batches seems to be used to hide the toxicity.

Next, I want to return you to the PERSONAL REALITY of the toxic batch problem.


A Personal Case of a Bad Batch

It turns out that Dr. Robert Malone got one of the “bad batches” for his second vaccine, and almost died.

Just read here.

LINK: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/how-bad-is-my-batch

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/5Q9dx


A Good Review of the Toxic Batch Problem

Lastly, here is a very nice review of work on the toxic batch problem. Very nicely put together, with lots of graphs and key points as quotes. This is a real CONVINCER.

LINK: https://hillmd.substack.com/p/vaccine-batches-vary-in-toxicity

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/h0R8Y

Some of the videos in the review have been removed for some reason, but not this one.

This video is truly stunning. This video shows apparent patterns in the deployment of batches. While I am not fully in agreement that this is proven to be the work of the companies themselves, I think that there is overwhelming evidence of “bad batches” and some kind of pattern which looks like the results are being studied.


By the time you’ve gotten here, you very likely think that something is definitely wrong with certain batches.

Next, I want to begin thinking about HOW and WHY somebody might want to do such a thing. In the process, I’m going to “lean into” some current events and statements made by varous people.

This is where things get political, geopolitical, military, and more.


How and Why Would Anybody Poison the West’s Major COVID Vaccines?

This is where we begin to say to ourselves:

Did somebody actually poison various lots of these vaccines? WHO would do it? Who COULD do it? WHY? Why would ANYBODY do this? HOW did they pull it off? WHAT possible benefit could they get from it? WHERE did they do it?

I’m going to leave most of these questions TO YOU ALL.

I want YOU to tell ME.

Now, we have a list of “usual suspects”, but things get interesting when you consider additional motives, additional suspects, and additional opportunities.

MEANS, MOTIVE, and OPPORTUNITY are what turn “conspiracy theories” into CRIMINAL THEORIES.

So I’m going to give you some “kick-starters” to get you seeing some possibilities.

The first thing that got me thinking “HMMMMM……” about things, was when Team Enigma began seeing evidence of coordination between the drug companies, in the chronology of the toxic batches.

As somebody who has been involved with real conspiracies, the idea that drug companies coordinated their plotting to poison the vaccines does NOT sound realistic.

Real conspiracies need compartmentalization. They need as few as possible seeing the big picture.

Thus, it is MUCH more likely, IMO, that there is a SINGLE player who is involved with ALL of the vaccines – a SINGLE player – who would be able to pull off a systematic study of poisoning them.

One such player is the CCP.

BOTH the Pfizer vaccine AND the Moderna vaccine are utterly dependent upon components manufactured in CHINA. Indeed, the “lipid nanoparticle technology” of the mRNA vaccines is pretty much delivered by Chinese companies.

That is how Karen Kingston discovered that components of the “clot shot” vaccines were manufactured by a Chinese company called SINOPEG, which ALSO specializes in something called “PEGylated graphene oxide”, which is further known to temperature-stabilize mRNA vaccines.

I’m not necessarily saying that graphene oxide was used here, although it’s worth considering.


SIDEBAR: For background on graphene oxide (sometimes called graphene hydroxide – it’s the same thing, really), go HERE.

SIDEBAR: For background on the work by Karen Kingston, former Pfizer employee, who figured out the Chinese connection on the lipid nanoparticle components, go HERE.


Moderna executives are also deeply associated with these Chinese companies and their controlling organizations – see photo below. Note what this page (discovered by Karen Kingston) means – you have COVID-19 vaccines, graphene lipid nanotech IN those same vaccines, and pictures of Moderna executives mentioned on the same page.

If this is not a smoking gun, it’s a pretty damn good imitation, suitable for blackmail.

Thus, it sure seemed possible to ME, that if the CCP or PLA wanted to “intervene” in the vaccines, they have MEANS and OPPORTUNITY.

What about MOTIVE?

Well, Deplorable Patriot found something that got me thinking.

So – according to this theory, the US is being blackmailed by the Chinese government.

As soon as I saw this, I realized exactly HOW the ChiComs could have war-gamed this whole thing for some grand-master play.

  • CCP/PLA + Cabal makes Western pharma weak and dependent upon ChiCom manufacturing
  • CCP/PLA has total control of Chinese companies and products they ship
  • CCP/PLA has total control of information within Chinese borders (remember their “rules” which made many SMART companies LEAVE CHINA)
  • CCP/PLA begins manipulating people to make them RUN FROM TRUTH and into CHINESE CONTROL

To me, this makes CHINA a no-brainer suspect. It doesn’t matter WHO is POTUS – Biden or Trump – if the vaccines have problems in the West, CHINA wins.

  • China gets power over the American POTUS
  • China gets power over the American Deep State
  • China gets power over the global pharmaceutical industry

Basically, it’s a form of entrapment.

And remember – if China gets caught and wants to blamecast, they can say “it wasn’t us – it was this rogue company cheating” – and nobody can prove otherwise on anything within Chinese borders.


NOW – there could be other players. China is not the only player who would benefit by making the West stumble here.

WEF, for instance, strikes me as “guilty as sin”. If the vaccines were really safe, they could not stir up as much division as we’re seeing. To me, KlauSS SSchwab and the WEFFEN SS have to be a suspect.

Depopulationists are also an easy target.

Satanists as well. This is their thing.

“FOREIGN” could also be doing things independently of their pet globalists and depopulationists.

Russia, unfortunately, is also an easy suspect, thanks to their stupid antics with Skripal and other spies. If the Russians wanted to keep America WEAK, causing a mess with the vaccines to keep Americans divided would be one way to do it. However, I tend to think that they don’t have as much MEANS and OPPORTUNITY as China. But to be fair, we have to keep Russia on the list.

Similarly Ukraine – to which Democrat operative Alexandra Chalupa seems to have some kind of weird supreme loyalty – because it doesn’t have a perfectly clean history on poisonings, either.

Ukrainian opposition presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko, with his face disfigured by illness, during an interview with the Associated Press in Kiev, Ukraine, Thursday, Dec. 16, 2004. Yushchenko said Thursday that he is sure he was poisoned by the Ukrainian government, and for the first time pinpointed the time and place of his dioxin poisoning: a Sept. 5 lunch with the head of the Ukrainian security service and his deputy. (AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky)

And, of course, there is our own DEEP STATE, still led in truth by Barack Obama.

Obama seems really committed to a kind of Stalinist, utilitarian, “death panel” health agenda, where health-care shuffles off people to their graves to save money.

Obama’s famous academic and New York Times-featured “moral advisors” on healthcare have always been, and remain in my opinion, a litany of granny-snuffers. SO – if Obama’s “worst of the worst of the KGB faction in CIA” wanted to begin testing depopper stuff on us – well – they could be up to tricks.

But none of them has as much MMO as China.

All in all, CHINA looks like my main suspect.

They poisoned our dog treats forever, making it look like greedy little companies was the extent of the problem.

We just put up with it.

Maybe they got ideas from that.

WHAT DO YOU THINK, SUSPICIOUS CAT?


So who is your main suspect?

Or do you have a different explanation of the toxicity of the shots – and especially something that explains the weirdly binary toxicity / non-toxicity of the batches?

I’m interested in your thoughts!


Have a Great Weekend

And don’t forget to…..

ENJOY THE SHOW.

W

DEAR KAG: 20220114 – The Pub is OPEN / Clot Shot Self-Deception as Part of Mass Formation Psychosis / Trusting the Plan by Trusting the Resolution of Conflict as Part of Creation

The Pub is OPEN!

And for once, the JUKE BOX IS WORKING! Somebody fixed the damn thing.

Let’s see if we can make it start on the right song……

We may serve an eclectic variety of somewhat less-than-noxious potions here, possibly unfamiliar to some patrons, but nonetheless, we shall earnestly attempt to cater to the tastes of our customers.

While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.


Christmas Spirit

Christmas spirit continues, including for those Orthodox brothers and sisters who just finished their Christmas Day a week ago, on January 7, 2022. Can we drag it out until the end of January?

LET’S TRY!!!

And now, the rules of the pub.


HOUSE RULES

God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.

Now, back to business.


AMEN!


Current Art On The Wall

AND somebody flips a new old song on the jukebox…..

Well, we’ve got us a WEIRD SHIPMENT of STRANGE ART, so we’re just putting it up on the walls of the bar, and PRICING IT TO MOVE.

Mass Psychosis 1927 by Laszlo Moholy Nagy

LINK: https://wanford.com/mass-psychosis-1927-by-laszlo-moholy-nagy/


Patriot Rooster by Kathleen Broaderick

LINK: https://www.ballarddesigns.com/bd/433955


5G Street by David Dees

Let’s try another take on electromagnetic radiation with a bit less MAGENTA


Because beauty is in the eye of the beholder by Ilian A. Deering

Let’s look more closely.

As well as a video on the making of…….

Ah, yes. The liberal arts and sciences are now the conservative arts and sciences. Even when there’s a little bit of that “one eye” stuff sneaking in.

Or is it just ART?

Something to think about.


Clot Shot Self-Deception as Part of Mass Formation Psychosis

I don’t remember where the tab URL below came from – hat tip to whoever found it – but it is critical to note how EVERYBODY CONCERNED is OK with blaming this obvious clot-shot death on “COVID-19”.

LINK: https://t.me/chiefnerd/1508


Nashville doctor dies from Pfizer vaccine

“The 57-year-old was admitted to St. Thomas Midtown in Nashville a short time after he received his first dose of the Pfizer vaccine.

‘Sometime after his first vaccine and he somewhat brushed it off, usually when he gets sick he gets better the next day and then he was hospitalized on December 7th,’ Alexis said.

Following a 12-day stint in the hospital, Dimitri passed away on December 20 from complications.”

https://www.wkrn.com/news/local-news/nashville/covid-19-takes-life-of-longtime-nashville-doctor/

@ChiefNerdt.me/chiefnerd/1508

24.6Kviews


Now – it’s imperative to go to that article and read it.

LINK: https://www.wkrn.com/news/local-news/nashville/covid-19-takes-life-of-longtime-nashville-doctor/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/6Jnm0

FTA (my BOLD):


“He was a very docile, a person with minimal words, but every time he spoke, they were very impactful words.”

That’s how 19-year-old Alexis Ndina is remembering her father, who said he passed away from COVID-19 just days before Christmas.

Dr. Dimitri Ndina was a loving father, husband, grandfather and a pharmaceutical doctor at Tennessee Oncology.

The 57-year-old was admitted to St. Thomas Midtown in Nashville a short time after he received his first dose of the Pfizer vaccine.

“Sometime after his first vaccine and he somewhat brushed it off, usually when he gets sick he gets better the next day and then he was hospitalized on December 7th,” Alexis said.

Following a 12-day stint in the hospital, Dimitri passed away on December 20 from complications.

They noted that he started to clot in his lower region so from his legs and started to work up,” Alexis explained.

His family is in disbelief, saying he was such a healthy man.

Alexis recalled the last words she said to her dad.

“I told him I loved him. He was a person who cared about how he looked so I kept telling him he was a very handsome man and all that,” Alexis said.

Following in her father’s footsteps, Alexis also wants to be a doctor just like him.

“He’s taught me everything I know, everything in my life that has been from him has impacted me, and I am just going to continue to make him proud,” Alexis said.

She also shared a message for the community she believes her dad would want everyone to hear.

“To continue his legacy I want everyone to stay proactive in being healthy because that’s what he would have wanted.”


WOLF again.

It is absolutely OBVIOUS to anybody who has followed the “clot shot”, that this man suffered stereotypical vaccine-induced clotting which is absolutely attributable of the vaccines, which knowingly, wrongly, inject a FACTORY for the spike protein into people’s bloodstreams.

And yet, as we might expect, the Fake News Media attributes it to COVID-19 – and NOT the vaccine.

It may be that some of the family, friends, and medical folks realize they are “sneaking out” some “clot-shot truth” past the media, under an accepted narrative banner of COVID-19.

Indeed, even the reporter may admit to self that “it’s not COVID – it’s the vaccine.” And yet – everybody plays the game, and pretends that it’s COVID.

To me, this is a classic symptom and effect of the MASS FORMATION PSYCHOSIS.

Another great example of this was the CNA who posted video in January 2021, at the beginning of the vaccine roll-out, about the phony “super-spreader” excuse that was used to cover up Pfizer vaccine deaths in nursing homes. He could not go along with it.

As a CHRISTIAN (listen to him), he could NOT be part of the mass formation psychosis which required him to state what he did not truly believe.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vdaicp-cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-inj.html

This was INDIVIDUAL SELF-DECEPTION and GROUP SELF-DECEPTION very typical of the MASS FORMATION PSYCHOSIS.

BUT WAIT….. yeah, THERE’S MOAR!

This was NOT the only nursing home where this happened. From February 15, 2021…..

LINK: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/46-residents-in-spanish-nursing-home-die-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccine/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/1slij

If you go to that article, there is a HUGE LIST of nursing homes that had massive deaths from “COVID-19” when they started vaccinating. YOU DECIDE. Maybe use Occam’s Razor while you’re at it.

  • 29 elderly people died in Norway shortly after receiving Pfizer’s vaccination.
  • 13 deaths among 40 residents following vaccination at one nursing home in Germany were dismissed as “tragic coincidence.”
  • 10 deaths in a German palliative care patients within hours to four days of COVID-19 vaccination were deemed a “coincidence.”
  • 22 of 72 residents of a nursing home in Basingstoke, England have died following vaccination.
  • 24 seniors at a nursing home in Syracuse, NY were reported to have died from COVID-19 as of January 9, 2021 despite having been vaccinated beginning December 22, 2020.
  • 10 cases of COVID-19 were reported on January 28 among seniors who had received both doses of Pfizer’s vaccine at one care home in Stockholm Sweden. The residents were vaccinated on December 27 and again on January 19.
  • The COVID-19 death toll in the small British enclave of Gibraltar numbered 16 before it launched its Pfizer vaccination campaign on January 10, 2021 and then shot up to 53 deaths 10 days later and to 70 seven days after that. According to a Reuters report, the Gibraltar Health Authority declared there was “no evidence at all of any causal link” between 6 of the deaths that were investigated and the Pfizer’s vaccine, despite the individuals having tested negative for Covid-19 before vaccination,  but positive “in the days immediately after.”
  • 4,500 COVID-19 cases in Israel occurred in patients after they had received one dose of Pfizer’s vaccine and 375 of those vaccinated patients required hospitalization, Israeli news media reported on January 12. 
  • Seven adults living in a care home in Saskatoon tested positive for coronavirus a week after residents were vaccinated at the Sherbrooke Community Centre, the CBC reported. There were no positive cases at the time of vaccination. 
  • Seven residents at a Montreal long-term care facility tested positive for Covid-19 within 28 days of being vaccinated with Pfizer’s vaccine, prompting the province of Quebec to delay the second Pfizer dose. 
  • Abercorn Care Home in Scotland, which began COVID-19 vaccinations on December 14, 2020 was home to an outbreak of the virus by January 10 and the National Health Service for the region refused to comment on whether vaccinated residents were ill. A care home staff group founder told the Scottish Daily Record : “We have had members of our group whose parents have had the vaccine and then two weeks later have tested positive for coronavirus.”
  • All of the residents at a home in Inverness, Scotland were vaccinated against COVID-19 early in January, but 17 became infected with the virus after the first dose. 

This is the OPPOSITE of what happened in the two Spanish nursing homes that saved everybody with antihistamines.

LINK: https://www.theqtree.com/2021/09/25/the-zyrtec-rebellion/

LINK: https://joannenova.com.au/2021/12/81109/

The MASS FORMATION PSYCHOSIS creates SELF-DECEPTION, both at the INDIVIDUAL and GROUP level.

Even more shocking, entire nations can begin to self-deceive.

People – SLAP yourselves. Something is very wrong here. DO NOT SELF-DECEIVE.

WHY people are taking these vaccines is beyond me.

Don’t do it. Just DON’T.

And with a TOAST to both Grandmaintexas (regular bartender) AND Aubergine (relentless foe of the clot shot)…..


And Now Our Feature Presentation

Trusting the Plan by Trusting the Resolution of Conflict as Part of Creation

As DePat, Sadie, and I have all pointed out recently, this site IS most definitely under spiritual attack.

However, I do NOT view that as “bad news”, because in my opinion, it means that (1) we actually may be attaining a state of notice BY annoyance OF the other side, and (2) we have to be at least somewhat OVER THE TARGET.

Now, as Duchess reminds us almost every day, we need SPIRITUAL ARMOR.

Well, I myself have taken to “upping” mine quite often, reading her post and seeing where I need an extra layer or two, and it’s paying off. Indeed, for some reason, after Delta, I have spiritual Kevlar to spare.

HOWEVER, not everybody here is so lucky. Thus, I DO REALIZE that I may be dragging many of us toward some battles that people just don’t want to fight any more. I mean, is anybody ELSE tired of COVID?

Yes, I’m tired of it, too – but there is a kind of temptation, because we are winning so BIG on the Branch Covidians now, I just can’t get up every day and not want to SCORE SOME MORE.

AND YET……

I can tell that people are TIRED and WORN OUT and I understand. People need R&R.

And you will GET R&R.

What I cannot promise you is that you will get ENOUGH of your R&R *HERE*.

So if people need to get away from here, I understand. It’s OK. In fact, it’s necessary.

But I promise you – when you come BACK here, there will be – just as Trump promised – WINNING.

Right now, if you can, SAVOR some of that winning, because you’ve fought long and hard for it.

I mean, where we were ON POINT if not the BLEEDING EDGE with much “conspiracy” stuff, the big names are now leaping over us to get to the front lines.

AND I LOVE IT!!!

A new song on the jukebox!

https://youtu.be/NNFK4i408dQ

SO – all that is the context of what I want to say.


A few days ago, I had a very interesting dream, which was induced in part by going to bed thinking about all of the “big questions” we are facing now.

We are being “shown” so much – and yet – well – it SEEMS like nobody is DOING anything about it.

WELL – not much that we can SEE. Or maybe just not much that we can PROVE. Or maybe….. well…..

…..maybe things really ARE happening on our side, too.

However, it’s MURKY. And we have to see CLEARLY to see what’s coming.

We have different views of things, and we COULD just “not talk about those critical things”, but that will NOT enable us to see things.

We need the STEREO VISION and PERSPECTIVE which can only come from DIFFERENT VIEWPOINTS SIMULTANEOUSLY.

I didn’t fully realize the NECESSITY of this, until FG&C posed a question, albeit not in question form.

“Frankly, I am both amazed by Wolf’s toleration of it as well as greatly perplexed by that toleration.”

I mean – I am deeply ANNOYED by some of us (and that includes ME on occasion) chiding the military for their seeming acceptance of “Traitor Joe” wrecking this country.

And yet, I think it is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to constantly consider the two alternatives, which I believe are BOTH swirling in the Pentagon / Pentagram.

A. They (meaning us) have to be shown the sick reality of the global plots of socialism.

B. They (meaning us) have to be acclimated to the reality of globally agreed socialism.

So which is it? After January 6, and how well that trap was laid out against PATRIOTS, I cannot dismiss the idea that the PENTAGON is involved in A, B, or (AND logic) BOTH.

And what if BOTH is in fact the answer?

That’s where things get REALLY mind-blowing.

BUT FIRST…..

Here is how I responded to FG&C.


This is one of those things where I’m trying to solve a problem and operating on my gut feeling of where the solution lies. It’s much bigger than this blog, frankly. Much bigger than all of us. Much bigger than MAGA, or America, or this world.

I had to sleep on it – to ponder it – and I got my answer, but it’s so big and so general and so difficult to describe in words that make sense to EITHER anybody OR everybody, that I KNOW I’m not quite ready to talk about it.

There are many components – many pieces – that matter – and we have bits of them assembled here, one might say.

It’s all starting to become clear to me BECAUSE those components are here and becoming visible. If we want to solve this stuff, we are FORCED to confront this stuff. It’s part of reclaiming some things that were LOST in order to fulfill both OLD purposes and NEW purposes.

PC has BLINDED US to proper solutions. We have to allow questions that we don’t want to see answers that we do want, which may even disprove and make irrelevant those questions we don’t want, but they do it in a productive way, with understanding that helps us move “forward” as part of creation.

All of which is to say, in a tiny thread through the object, that progressives burning books and toppling statues is ultimately contradictory, because they destroy the very knowledge that enables proper progress. And that goes back to – the necessary and non-erroneous creation of error itself as part of creation, which is good a priori.

For the moment, though, we will have to put up with questions we don’t want, bad answers to those questions until we have better ones, and uncomfortable alternatives, largely created as false dichotomies, which often obscure, but visualized and deciphered can lead to true answers.

SIGH. Yet I have FAITH, because I SEE where this is going, and God willing, I will see it more, and better, and clearer in days to come.


So what has happened since then?

What I’m seeing, more clearly now, is still hard to describe, but it does have components that we all understand. Many of them are things which have to be CONSERVED. Things that go back to….

  • our youths
  • the last century
  • the Civil War
  • the Founders
  • the Enlightenment
  • the Middle Ages
  • Christ
  • the Prophets
  • Moses
  • Abraham
  • the beginnings of civilization
  • early Man
  • Creation

Obvious then, why the enemy cannot STAND things in the past, and makes us try to destroy them.

The mistakes which are continuously being made by progressives and (COUGH) certain others, because those mistakes have to be made, are in fact things that become our DUTY to oppose – and thus to quench and temper into something better.

Technology and “progress” don’t SOLVE our problems – they just REPLACE our problems with NEW ONES.

BUT THAT IS PART OF THE DESIGN.

You see – at the same time – technology and progress DO fulfill necessary aspects of the CREATION that God both SEES as good and PROCLAIMS as good. They are, IMO, utilities upon which the building of God’s kingdom “on Earth as it is in Heaven” becomes POSSIBLE.

AND YET – the physical – the WORLD – remains ONLY THAT, and NOT part of the Kingdom per se.

“For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.”

If I can offer you one thing most of all, it is a certain TEMPERING of the SHIELD OF FAITH…..

…….which comes from TRUSTING GOD’S DESIGN……

…..but not just in Heaven, and not just on Earth, but right here, right now, in America, and in your state, and in your town, and in your home, reading these words.

One might say, we need to “Trust the Plan”, even when it seems to be helping our enemies – or even worse – when it IS – as far as we can see – actually helping our enemies.

In my opinion, the CONFLICT that we see, and that we are a part of, and that we must allow to come to us, here on this site, is part of the plan that we are supposed to trust.

And I’m OK with that. I hope that you will be, too. If conflict comes to us, from within or without, while we are doing our best to stand up for God, then we should not fear it – we should welcome it.

Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.”

John 18:36

And thus, I wish you a great weekend.

ENJOY THE SHOW.

W

As Cthulhu says, “We’ve got the cookies!”


And then somebody yells……

LAST CALL!

…..and somebody puts THIS ONE on the jukebox.

GET OUT ON THE DANCE FLOOR, GIRLS!

Making Sense of Pro-Vax Trump

Risks, Bets, Rewards and Losses – Why Vaccine-Conferred and Disease-Conferred Immunity are Both Proper Personal Gambles When Choice is Free and Enough Truth is Known or Unknown


Many of us were shocked that President Trump just showed his “pro-vax” hand in an interview with vaxx nutt Bill O’Reilly, but if you watch Trump long enough, you realize that he very often gets to the optimal perspective before anybody else – even with incomplete data.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1472987776786354177

It’s worth wondering why Trump said what he said, and said it when he said it.

Beyond the “credit” issue – which I can really see for many reasons, not the least of which is because Trump’s plan really messed up the Cabal plans on COVID – I think Trump knows people who are seeing the emerging data. And I think they are advising him correctly.

I’m going to try to show you some of that data, and what it means.

Rand Paul is a sharp guy, too. Trump respects Rand Paul. It pays to ask why. I think that part of it is because Rand is a doctor. Trump respects doctors, I am convinced. And Trump knows that doctors differ in their opinions, like everybody else, and that he (Trump) needs to listen to a number of them, to see where the best perspective resides.

Rand is not anti-vaxx. He’s pro-natural-immunity. There is a difference.

At the place where Trump’s viewpoint and Rand Paul’s viewpoint intersect, you will find much truth. I certainly did. And when I added in a few other doctors “on our side”, and looked carefully at where I was skeptical of some of their thinking, but also let them convince me to be skeptical of some of my own thinking, I hit the jackpot.

BOTH the vaccines AND the disease make sense as alternative, risky, immunity-conferring antigens. Neither one is obviously superior to the other for everybody, because the landscape of risk and benefit is too complex, and depends far too much on the needs, goals, and medical circumstances of the individual. Worse still, past choices – including accidental ones – affect future choices.

Rand Paul saw right into this – that the CRUX of the problem is that “natural immunity” is being ignored by a monetarily, scientifically, and institutionally compromised medical establishment. Natural, disease-conferred immunity is the BEST CHOICE for many people – particularly when combined with a “delay of onset” strategy, and TREATMENT, which alters the risk/benefit. We have known this all along, yet we have never truly internalized it, because the “Let’s You And Him Fight” strategy of the OBAMA MANDATES has widened and deepened the division between those who choose vaccines and those who don’t.

AND LOGIC.

Trump GETS THIS. And he said so. We ARE falling into their trap. BUT we can turn that around on a DIME.

It is critical for our side – the free and sane medicine side – to EXPOSE and BASH the performance of the vaccines, because the other side won’t do it. But it is also critical that we STAND UP for the freedom for others to take those risky vaccines voluntarily, and accept the truth that it can make sense, during a period where we don’t know everything, and MAYBE beyond that, after we know more.

Mandates are absolutely stupid, reckless, and anti-science. They interfere with medicine. The mandating commies need to BTFO. But letting fearful people take a risky vaccine – a personal gamble – is a part of freedom that we have to respect.

I want to show you data that makes this make sense.


Some of you may be surprised that I am defending the COVID vaccines AT ALL. At present I have ZERO intention of taking one. For me, and my wife, they are a BAD medical choice. For many others, too.

Well, what if I tell you that in doing so, I can defend disease-conferred immunity EVEN MORE?

What if I tell you that I can now see why, strategically, Trump waited until we “knee-capped” – but didn’t kill – the vaccines?

BOTH SIDES HAD TO SEE MORE CLEARLY.

Let me help you see more clearly.


Natural Immunity – More Risk With More Reward?

What I just said there is not always true.

For CHILDREN, it appears that the vaccines are MORE RISK, LESS REWARD.

Yeah, Trump was right about that.

It’s a NO-BRAINER to NOT, NOT, NEVER, EVER give this shit to kids, and I personally hope that God himself does whatever is needed to save children from the MONSTERS who are injecting them with these RELATIVELY dangerous vaccines.

Kids are being deprived of EXCELLENT natural immunity, for JUNK immunity that makes money for Big Pharma.

Just for starters, we may be condemning these kids to a lifetime of life-robbing spike boosters, just by virtue of a well-understood idea of “original antigenic sin”, or OAS. OAS is where one antigen leads to an inappropriate response to a later antigen, vaccine, or infection.

This means that if we give children a misleading FIRST ANTIGENIC STIMULUS, they may then be STUCK with sub-optimal antibody immunity, leaving them for an unknown time at GREATER RISK from the disease. It may very well be that the BEST FIRST ANTIGEN for SARS-CoV-2 is the DISEASE – not a spike protein vaccine.

We don’t KNOW what will happen long-term when we inject kids. Or, at least, most of us don’t. Maybe Fauci does.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Is it a good idea? Should we bet ALL our kids on that idea?

NO FREAKING WAY.

And THAT is assuming that these vaccines do nothing to affect fertility. If they DO affect fertility, then this has to be made a KNOWN and ADMITTED risk, at the very least – not covered up, like it is right now.

A call for Nuremberg II, more likely, if this was knowingly advanced.

Who wants to risk their kids’ chance of having children?

This brings up the question of whether parents have the right to *knowingly* neuter their kids. Some parents already are, by “transing” kids. I think it’s pretty clear that’s where the Cabal is going – neutering and spaying humans. Interesting question. Should it be sent to SCOFFLAW SCOTUS? How is Amy Comey Barren going to vote on that one?

Asking for a FIEND.

I would even extend that thinking to teens and young adults. There is no reason that I can see to give them the vaccine. But should they have that choice, in consultation with their doctors? Interesting question. Very hard to reconcile a pro-life position with that, isn’t it?

But back to natural immunity.


Natural Immunity – More Rewards

Are there, in fact, more rewards?

I think so. Look at these two figures from the UK Ministry of Health, showing spike protein antibodies in people in England in 2021.

LINK:

…..https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf

The darker the color, the stronger the antibodies.

The first graphs are people who have no evidence of having caught the disease (N protein negative). They include the unvaccinated uninfected and the vaccinated uninfected.

The yellow is the unvaccinated people who have not caught the disease – mostly kids.

Green, blue and purple are various levels of vaccination success – the darker, the more spike antibodies.

Now look at people who got some or all of their spike immunity by natural infection with the disease.

Assuming it’s a wash as far as the quality of the antibodies – which is not necessarily true – it’s obvious that these recoverees have a more robust spike antibody immunity – to say nothing of likely immunity to some or all of the other 20+ proteins in SARS-CoV-2.

Rand Paul, right here. The man is asking the right questions.

So why is Fauci ignoring this natural immunity stuff?

Notice that KIDS don’t mount a strong spike immunity, even though they beat down the disease in a hurry, with minimal symptoms. This is likely an EVOLVED RESPONSE – an EVOLVED STRATEGY – a form of EVOLVED INTELLIGENCE. What it says is that kids “know” by evolution – don’t build a lasting defense to the ever-changing spike protein. Meanwhile, the virus tries to “rope-a-dope” us slowly into concentrating on the spike as we age, misleading us with each attack. We lean on the crutch of spike antibodies that don’t work on the next strain, or actually make things worse.

Kinda funny that Fauci and the “follow the science” types don’t respect this signal from evolution, but whatever. That’s the basis of another post. But keep it in mind – it’s likely important.

So let us not digress.

The bottom line is that IF you’re going to make spike antibody immunity your standard of success, which Fauci and company clearly have, as part of Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis”, then by that standard, “natural immunity” from the disease gives MORE REWARD.

And again, I remind you, there are MANY other metrics of immunological success which are highly relevant, and which are ignored under Fauci spike antibody hypnosis. Always keep that in mind.


Natural Immunity – More Risks

SO – is the disease “more risk” to get that more reward?

My answer would be “maybe”.

It’s a complex calculation – particularly if you factor in “not getting the disease until you get it”. When you vaccinate, it’s a down payment in full, and with boosters, you’re even stuck with installments. You are “accepting that the risks happen” at 100%. Vaccination “collapses the probabilities”. But if you take your chances on the disease, by simply not vaccinating, you are delaying the (probably) higher risk, but the “risk over time” is substantially reduced.

Imagine the “payoff” of not vaccinating or getting the disease until Omicron. That would have been a GREAT gamble and winnings.

But let’s look at an ACTUAL COMPARATIVE RISK of vaccine vs. disease.

Now – let me be clear from the start – this article is a CLICK-BAIT CHERRY-PICKING of the highest order. The title numbers SEEM shocking – until you dig into it, and go to the source.

But still, they’re not “lying”. It’s just misguided. But that CHAFF led me to WHEAT.

Let me include the entire, short report, as it appeared in GWP.


On December 14th, 2021, Nature Medicine released a study based on a broad population data set analyzed by researchers at Oxford University. The researchers examined the risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination and infection.

The Oxford researchers reveal that 1 in 100 or 1% of all vaccinated individuals were admitted to the hospital or died with arrhythmia or irregular heartbeat.

Of the 38,615,491 vaccinated individuals included in our study, 385,508 (1.0%) were admitted to hospital with or died from cardiac arrhythmia at any time in the study period (either before or after vaccination); 86,754 (0.2%) of these occurred in the 1-28 days after any dose of vaccine. Of those who were admitted or died 39,897 (10.3%) had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test, with 29,694 (7.7%) having a positive test before vaccination. There were 7,795 deaths with cardiac arrhythmia recorded as the cause of death (1,108 had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test).

So 1 in 100 of the vaccinated individuals are going to the hospital with irregular heart beat and this isn’t international headlines?

This is a shocking number.

James Cintolo has more on this study.


Wolf again.

This study appeared in the journal NATURE. That is the big leagues. We have to take this seriously. But let’s look at it closely. It REALLY helps to see that entire document, although SUSPICIOUS CAT should come out, just looking at the TITLE.

NATURE PAPER: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0

Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection

See? This isn’t just about the vaccines – it looks at infection, too. Is Gateway Pundit giving us the full story? Maybe not.

ABSTRACT:

Although myocarditis and pericarditis were not observed as adverse events in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine trials, there have been numerous reports of suspected cases following vaccination in the general population. We undertook a self-controlled case series study of people aged 16 or older vaccinated for COVID-19 in England between 1 December 2020 and 24 August 2021 to investigate hospital admission or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias in the 1–28 days following adenovirus (ChAdOx1, n = 20,615,911) or messenger RNA-based (BNT162b2, n = 16,993,389; mRNA-1273, n = 1,006,191) vaccines or a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive test (n = 3,028,867). We found increased risks of myocarditis associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 vaccines and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine over the 1–28 days postvaccination period, and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3), one (95% CI 0, 2) and six (95% CI 2, 8) myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively, in the 28 days following a first dose and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273. This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41) myocarditis events per 1 million patients in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We also observed increased risks of pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Similar associations were not observed with any of the COVID-19 vaccines, apart from an increased risk of arrhythmia following a second dose of mRNA-1273. Subgroup analyses by age showed the increased risk of myocarditis associated with the two mRNA vaccines was present only in those younger than 40.

The TRUTH is right in there.

First, we have to remember that GWP was concentrating on 1% of vaccinated people during the study period, INCLUDING before they got vaccinated, going to the hospital for or dying from a cardiac arrhythmia. That “before they got vaccinated” point is a TIP, right there, that we really need to consider the risk for UNVACCINATED people, too – including these very same people – for comparison. And as an aside, what is the number for corresponding unvaccinated people? You can almost guess that for most old people, it’s gonna be – well – maybe 1%?

And indeed, when the researchers compared the risk of an “event” against the risks of these patients BEFORE vaccination, they got their answers.

The WORST CASE for the vaccines was myocarditis. So let’s look at that, first.

Here is the risk from the vaccines. Broken out with [notations] so it’s easy to understand.


We found increased risks of myocarditis

associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 [AstraZeneca] and BNT162b2 [Pfizer] vaccines

and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 [Moderna] vaccine

over the 1–28 days postvaccination period,

and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. [STRONGLY NOTE THIS!!!]

We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3),

one (95% CI 0, 2)

and six (95% CI 2, 8)

myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively,

in the 28 days following a first dose

and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million

vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273.


SO – this confirms what we know. The vaccines cause myocarditis. It’s a RISK. It’s a handful or two in a million, per injection.

But now, let’s look at the NEXT LINE.


This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41)

myocarditis events per 1 million patients

in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test.


What this says TO ME is that the risk of this one heart problem, in a vaccine that gives less immunity, is a significant fraction of the same risk from the disease.

Obviously due to the SPIKE PROTEIN, and possibly with a simple correlation to exposure.

I will admit that it’s LESS RISK from the vaccines, but not all that much.

Look at MODERNA.

The compiled risk of myocarditis from the TWO SHOTS (6+10 = 16) is 40% of the disease risk (40).

And yet HERE is how the authors have to word things to get it past the referees and editors.


“In summary, this population-based study quantifies for the first time the risk of several rare cardiac adverse events associated with three COVID-19 vaccines as well as SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in adults was associated with a small increase in the risk of myocarditis within a week of receiving the first dose of both adenovirus and mRNA vaccines, and after the second dose of both mRNA vaccines. By contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a substantial increase in the risk of hospitalization or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmia.


They played a lot of word games there – take it from a retired scientist. They are also STUDIOUSLY AVOIDING some big stories that would rub the industry wrong.

“Give the editors what they want.”

Now, before I examine that conclusion for further trickery on the “within a week” qualifier and several other points (not today), I just want to say that calling 16 “small” and 40 “substantial” is bullshit.

Author bias, implicit or imposed, as a virtue signal to Bill Gates’ “vaccine culture” in science.

I will bet MONEY that a third Moderna booster would come in at 14 or more, bringing the total myocarditis events from chronic spike protein exposure to 30 or more, AND at the 4th injection SURPASSING the risk of ONE untreated disease incidence.

Well, is it worth it?

I don’t want Dementia Joe telling ME that it’s worth it. I want to make that determination MYSELF.

And GUESS WHAT? I will also bet money that part of the reason that CDC wanted people to mix and match boosters was to get Moderna “recoverees” boosted with the less cardiotoxic Pfizer or J+J vaccines, while not admitting that…

….defects from each spike protein vaccine are cumulative.

See how that works? Science. It’s great when you’re HONEST.

And why IS Pfizer causing fewer cardiac problems? In my opinion, it is very likely because the vaccine is distributing more widely and slowly in the body, thanks to the extreme vaccine lipid nanoparticle longevity (hence shedding) and biodistribution – data that was hidden from us, but turned up in the Japanese freedom of information request.

To me, the fact that nobody sees or talks about this stuff, is just more evidence of “vaccine hypnosis” of academia, as noted by Peter McCullough.

The reality? PICK YOUR POISON. Disease or vaccine.

If we go back to the arrhythmia example, it turns out that the “shocking 1%” actually GOES AWAY when compared to the unvaccinated. This makes sense, when you recall the very common problem of “palpitation” sending people to the ER, long before “long COVID” was a thing.

Yeah, 1% is shocking, but it’s shocking for the unvaccinated, too. Gateway Pundit was just throwing unwarranted shade.

Now, let’s take a look at some GRAPHICS from the study. Pictures tell a thousand words – not all bad for the vaccines – not all bad for “natural immunity”.

On the left axis you have the three vaccines, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna, followed by the disease.

On the bottom axis, time – repeated three times for the three diseases.

As you can see for cardiac arrhythmia (right side), the vaccines are basically fine, but the disease is problematic. This makes LOTS of sense, because the disease seems to cause many problems by nerve infiltration, secondary to vascular distribution, and those nervous system infections and inflammations are highly relevant for arrhythmias, whereas the vaccine is primarily a vascular villain, which does NOT reproduce and infiltrate.

The science makes sense here! Wonderful!

All of the vaccines have at least a little bit of myocarditis effect (left side), which is explained nicely by vascular distribution of the spike protein. Moderna, which is notorious for “disease-like symptoms” at the recipient experience level, is easily expected to have even more COVID-like spike protein effects that are not immediately obvious, such as myocarditis.

Big point – ONLY the disease (bottom side) kicks off all three diseases. THAT is what a virus can do, that a bare protein, or even a non-reproducing virus-like particle, cannot.

Everything is making sense here. Let’s look at ANOTHER view of the data.

This graph has some GREAT STUFF. The myocarditis comparison described in detail above, is the graph on the LEFT. The numbers for the vaccines look substantially less, but you can see how Moderna boosters would quickly approximate the disease, and are already like a “mild case” in terms of risks. The authors of the paper avoid talking about the cumulative risks, but it’s clear that “boosterama” is PRECISELY Fauci’s game plan, and it has problems that got solved for Moderna by mix-and-match boosters.

Fauci and Walensky. Always taking care of their companies. Yeah, I kinda get it. But you gotta be HARD-ASS with them, like Director Wolf Moon would be.

The whole vaccine thing – including a lot of other adverse effects I’ve mentioned previously but not discussed here – looks to me like a trade-off. These are NOT good vaccines. They’re actually pretty marginal. BUT for people who really don’t think they can take the disease, it could be a reasonable gamble, IMO.

There are LOTS of people who take these vaccines, and no problem. I know – I talk to them all the time. I’m the most vaccine-supportive vaccine skeptic on Earth. These people just dump everything to me, because they know I don’t judge them, but respect their decisions. I’m interested in what happened to them, and they tell me.

NADA. ZIP. The most common reaction. For those people, the shot may make sense. But there are a good number of others who get laid up hard for a day in bed, and it sounds almost as bad as COVID. I worry about them. Some – A LOT.

Now look at the second graph – myocarditis in younger people. Clearly Moderna is WAY out of whack, and the others are comparable to the disease when boosted. Again – for these people – really BAD vaccines. This is why you saw action on the vaccines. Get values up close to the disease, in terms of numerical risks, and the problem becomes an elevator pitch that everybody understands.

Pericarditis and arrhythmia? Purely a disease problem. This looks very good for the vaccine. This is what you WANT with a vaccine – to AVOID some problem of the disease. BUT – can we trust those numbers?

I think so, and I think that Gateway Pundit got burned by looking at COMMENTS on a blog post explaining the Nature study.

LINK: https://jamescintolo.substack.com/p/new-bombshell-myocarditis-study-out

This is a GREAT post – here is the conclusion:


 THE TAKEAWAY

Public health policy in the USA and UK need to change fast. As a side note, if you listen to the mainstream media enough they’ll have you believing myocarditis is a mild symptom. Let me be clear, by definition, symptoms requiring hospitalization are defined as severe. What’s more, the average mortality rate of non-fulminant myocarditis is nearly 56% which is experienced within 3-10 years. Sadly, that is a consequence of the likely heart failure that develops after the acute phase of myocarditis has resolved. See picture below 👇🏻

All things considered, it is clear that individuals under 40 are at a high risk of experiencing vaccine induced myocarditis. The good news is, there are ways to deal with this. More specifically, increasing the time between the first and second dose, not giving boosters to all healthy individuals under 40, pausing Moderna for many under 30, and seeking the guidance of other countries. All of that makes for better public health policy and positive health outcomes. To finish, I will leave you with the words of a wise man, “Health care is vital to all of us some of the time, but public health is vital to all of us all of the time”. – C. Everett Koop


Wolf again.

Now – in the comments, somebody mentioned the “1% issue”, and I suspect this is where GWP picked it up. Sadly, the comment author deleted and restated their comment, probably after realizing it had spawned a widely read article.

Here is the replacement comment, with replies.


zuFpM5*M6 hr ago I erased my previous comment. The closer I look at this study, the more it freaks me out.

They compare vaxxed to vaxxed+covid and then declare covid is worse, but they measure rates of myocarditis/pericarditis in post covid with troponin levels and in post vaxx with hospitalization rates. Hmmmm

They don’t include any control group of unvaxxed. The vaxx+covid group should be compared to unvaxx+covid to determine the actual rate of post covid heart issues. This is not done that I can tell?

The vaccinated showed a 1% hospitalization rate for cardiac arrhythmia with ~385,000 in the period up to 28 days post vaccination. I tried to look up population rates of hospitalization and found some old news articles discussing ~350,000-500,000 hospitalizations annually for ‘atrial fibrillation’ for the entire US population. So a group of vaccinated in UK blew out the entire US annual budget of arrhythmia hospitalizations in a couple month period? And that isn’t a highlighted part of the research results but instead they compare only within the vaccinated group broken out by short temporal periods? Isn’t the most important thing the vaccinated versus background normal rate?

I begin to think this whole study was gamed to get vaccinated rates of these issues versus supposed covid rates so they could continue to say vaccines are safer, when the actual #s are showing a horrific rise in these issues. It is a preemptive narrative shaping attempt.

I am not a doctor, researcher or number cruncher, so if I am misunderstanding this, I would be interested to hear how.
br143 hr ago There’s no way to sugar coat the study.

Of the ~385,000 people with arrhythmia, 10.3% had a positive Covid-19 test, and 7.7% tested positive at some point prior to vaccination.

Even if you remove 18% of the total, that’s still an awful lot of people with arrhythmia. I suppose most of us have some form of arrhythmia at some time in our lives, but how many of us are treated in hospital?
zuFpM5*M3 hr ago Yes. I would not subtract them either. I feel that there would be a covid risk increase + vaccine risk increase + covid/vaccine interaction risk increase to account for. None of which can be done without estimating the covid risk increase by comparing with non-vaccinated covid patients.

This is where they lost me. They’re just tossing out “maybes”. Nothing jumps out at me as likely to change the result. I can even add my own experience with cardiovascular issues from the disease. They’re REAL. Very unlikely that the vaccines and disease would FLIP on the relative risks of arrhythmia.

Score 1 for the vaccines.

BACK TO THE TRUMP ISSUE.


Benefits of the Vaccine Admitted by Our Side

There is a GREAT video by Geert Vanden Bossche that I keep pushing, because it is one of the clearest explanations of why “leaky mass vaccination” is a bad idea. Note that this is from a pro-vaxxer who has indeed worked with vaccines for his whole career, and is a former member of GAVI.

He just demands good vaccines, and good public vaccination policy.

Now – if you jump to around 4:30 in the video, you can hear him list the positives of the clot shot. HOWEVER, it may be better to just invest some of your time in that 4 1/2 minutes where he warms up to that point, to understand that he’s putting the positives AND the negatives in context, and looking at the bigger picture to recommend that we NOT mass-vaccinate.

He is saying that we should NOT mass-vaccinate IN SPITE OF the benefits that he lists and explains.

  • a decrease of disease in many countries
  • decline of morbidity and mortality rates
  • less illness in people who got vaccinated
  • severe disease is resisted even when vaccinees are infected with variants
  • they will shed much less virus than the unvaccinated, even when infected with variants
  • seropositivity rates are increasing in the population thanks to vaccination

But THAT is where he begins to disagree with mass vaccination. He states that we will NOT reach herd immunity, due to variants, and he explains this fully.


Global Problems of Sub-Optimal Mass Vaccination

At 28:00 minutes, Geert explains what we need to do – which is NOT what public officials are doing.

The current mass vaccination program will make things worse, in the long term. Geert explains then the kinds of vaccines we really need – vaccines which can both generate sterilizing immunity, AND which prime the immune systems of their recipients toward cellular immunity.

Yeah, it’s a bit of a tough goal, but it’s realistic toward the challenges of the China virus, and honest about what we need to do.

So what does this mean about the benefits of the vaccine?

THEY ARE REAL, BUT THEY ARE SHORT-SIGHTED. And they are accompanied by risks. Not just to the vaccinees, but to ALL OF US ON THIS PLANET.

According to Geert, continued vaccination is going to HARM vaccinees, relative to the unvaccinated, who will need to avoid virus-shedding vaccinees. At that point, recoverees may be in the best position of all, but still – not great. ALL of us will be in trouble from the virus which will escape the vaccines.

Geert also explains how we can prove that he is correct – by looking at the mutations in the virus which is shed from vaccinees, which will show selection for more infectious variants, if he is correct.

Now – this is a GREAT interview of Geert by Dana Loesch, who looks more and more like Sandra Bullock for some reason, but what the heck – the shotgun shells on her microphone setup are EXCELLENT, very non-Bullock, and she gets a FANTASTIC explanation of the problem from Geert.

Geert actually talks about Omicron, and the DANGER of it potentially evolving to be MORE SEVERE.

Take a listen!

Does Trump know this stuff? I don’t know.

I personally believe that Geert is right. I am now of the opinion that most of what we are hearing from Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, and Geert Vanden Bossche is true, but that each one has to give a little toward the ultimate truth.

What does that look like to me?

  • Natural immunity is NOT permanent or complete toward other variants
  • Natural immunity is better than the vaccines, generally speaking, but not bulletproof
  • Untreated COVID is a loser relative to the vaccines, but treated COVID is a winner
  • McCullough’s natural immunity prediction based on SARS1 may be too confident
  • Malone’s whistleblower on more shedding by vaccinees may have been wrong or disinformation
  • Geert’s vax-brag of less shedding by vaccinees may have been too kind and not skeptical enough
  • We have to stop pushing the vaccines, for the good of humanity
  • We have to allow the vaccines to continue, at an acceptably lower rate, for research
  • We have to allow vaccines to change faster, to keep up with mutations, IF and only IF this will not PUSH the virus to mutate and select faster (immune pressure must be low enough)
  • We have to pursue the superior vaccines that Geert is specifying
  • We have to use infection, treatment, and recovery as a big gun to reach herd immunity
  • We have to let COVID burn out of epidemic status, to reach a treatable endemic status
  • We cannot do that with mass vaccination, so mandates must cease promptly and completely
  • Joe Biden and CDC must be stopped – by military power if need be – if they will not end the crazy mandates

Yeah, you heard me. We can’t let this demented bozo, backed by an evil Obama and China, make COVID worse by mass vaccination. Mandates are making things worse.


Freedom, Vaccines and Morality

Trump may not understand Geert Vanden Bossche’s warning, but if we set that aside as an unknown, you can understand where Trump is coming from.

If we want freedom, we have to let other people make stupid choices that affect them most of all. Vaccination is, in fact, one of those things. Indeed, it is by US seeing it that way, that I believe we will end this nightmare of division which PUMPS UP the vaxxies and the crazy mandates.

In the same way that there are vaxxies who now are defending OUR freedom to be unvaccinated, I believe we have to defend the right of people to stupidly (or smartly) take the vaccine. However, we MUST get the rate of vaccination DOWN below the level where immune pressure from the vaccine creates more and more infectious variants.


The FIRST thing is not to take the vaccine yourself, or give it to your children.

The SECOND thing is to fight for an end to mandates.

The THIRD thing is to fight for BETTER vaccines, and to expand belief that the current vaccines are NOT GOOD ENOUGH, and are of the WRONG TYPE. Make the vaxxies demand better, not defend bad vaxxes.

The FOURTH thing is to spread the message that the “socially responsible thing to do” is to support Vanden Bossche’s position, that NOT taking the vaccine NOW is what will ultimately “save grandma”.

The last one is a hard sell, with FAKE NEWS pumping vaccine stupidity, but hey – we’ve fought tougher battles already.


So what about Trump?

Well, he is not in the position to know or respond to the “Geert Vanden Bossche Question”. Not yet. It is only when that issue becomes BURNING HOT, that Trump will be able to smartly push FORWARD from the current stupid CLOT SHOTS.

We will have to RAISE VACCINE CONSCIOUSNESS to levels of understanding that SUBVERT FAKE NEWS. We can only do that by getting most of the vaxxies on our side – to demand BETTER vaccines.

If they want to be guinea pigs – GREAT. They can be heroes, and try the deadly experimental vaccines. But we should NOT be forcing all of humanity to be part of a BAD and MISGUIDED experiment.

And the JOKERS who are allegedly running our military need to understand this. Virtue signals which kill troops, even if slowly and quietly, where nobody can see them, are NOT ACTUALLY VIRTUOUS. I appreciate them kicking out the sane ones who understand that the current bad clot shots may cripple readiness at some point, rather than forcibly injecting them. We WILL have a reserve of trained people who are not destroyed by China and Biden, no matter what China’s coming chess moves. Thank you for that. But as for everything else – there could have been push-back against communism, instead of acquiescence.

Yes, we had to be shown. But I’m not sure showing us subservience to a COUP and CHINA and FAKE NEWS isn’t undoing half of the good stuff.

But this as well. If you guys delivered Omicron on purpose, thanks. It LOOKS like it may be working.

Merry Christmas!

W

The Vaccine-Powered Rona-Coaster

Is the Directed Evolution of Variants – Something Deeply Understandable to Joe Biden’s Science Advisors – Being Abused by the Corporate-Government-Academic Axis?

Yeah, you remember that one!

Several hat tips to Sundance on this one, too.

It’s now becoming very clear that the mercenary Bill Gates getting involved with healthcare was one of the LAST things that one could reasonably expect to help it.

We were such chumps.

GRIFTERS GONNA GRIFT.

They don’t “change”. They don’t “turn over a new leaf”. They GRIFT MORE and they GRIFT BIGGER.

Two international vaccine experts can help us to see how we got into the SUSTAINABLE GRIFT of needless vaccines to endlessly mutating viruses, which Bill Gates helped engineer.

Notice that I didn’t say sustainability grift – that’s a different grift, that uses MIRAGES of process sustainability to sell the opposite.

An excellent example of the sustainability grift is wind power, which – when you count all the resource consumption and natural destruction needed to “move lots of matter around with low energy output”, wastes more energy and resources overall, than it produces – and in the long run is NOT actually “sustainable”.

Wind power uses a mirage of overall sustainability which results from hypnosis by the microscopic sustainability of just ONE STAGE in the process, to sell a totality which is not truly sustainable or even efficient. Solar power is very similar. It has its uses, but the mirage they sell is far outside of the truth.

This type of grifting uses a misleading focus on part of the truth to sell a larger untruth, which is how many science grifts work.

Perpetual motion machines are an exemplary grift, and Anthony Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis” is an exemplary misdirection.

No – a sustainable grift (which can include the sustainability grift, cutely) is a grift that maintains itself in perpetuity, provided nobody looks closely. One of the best ways to create such a grift, is to pose a general source of a problem as a solution to it, so that the central problem will NEVER be solved.

This is a form of misleading by REVERSING reality. It’s a CYCLIC grift, that creates a false solution which is really a problem source.

Black Lives Matter(TM) is precisely that kind of sustainable grift.

To solve policing problems, BLM/Soros creates more problems and mischaracterizes them so that they can’t be solved.

BLM(TM), working with Soros DAs and AGs, creates thousands of new criminals of all kinds, at the same time hindering police, in the name of mercy for criminals who are intentionally misportrayed as innocent.

If you can pull it off, this kind of misleading can create monumental, whole-of-society grifts, that in some cases can NEVER be undone.

Climate change / global warming / global freezing are all beautiful GRIFTS of that nature, joined by the principle that “together, we can all do something impossible” – even better if it’s something needless. If the workers of the scam movement get busted, they just change the story – like all criminals do.

“Government will protect you from what it cannot affect.”

Fall for that kind of scam, and you are a SLAVE FOR LIFE.

So where does this go with vaccines?


Bill Gates Takes Over Global Vaccination

Astrid Stuckelberger figured out what was happening to global public health when Bill Gates took control of it, but she figured it out too late.

I highly recommend reading this article:

https://uncanceled.news/former-who-employee-dr-astrid-stuckelberger-a-pandemic-of-lies/

Let’s just save that image for when Bill Gates’ friends finally take down that article.

Here is the relevant section:


Stuckelberger also underscored that the “WHO is not the same organization as before”. There was a change in 2016, she explained.

“It was special: Organizations such as GAVI – the Global Alliance for Vaccine Immunization led by Bill Gates – they came to WHO in 2006 with funding. Since then, the WHO has developed into a new type of international organization. GAVI gained more and more influence, and total immunity, more than the diplomats in the UN. GAVI can do exactly what they want, the police can do nothing.”

The WHO underwent an audit in 2014 and after that, it became more like a company with countries as its subsidiaries.

“When I worked with international relations in the WHO in 2013, I saw that GAVI came in more and more. GAVI presented a global action plan for vaccination 2012-2020. That is, eight years where GAVI had everything in their hands. Bill Gates handled the vaccination, he took over.”

The WHO wields enormous power over countries, she said. “Before, all countries were free. But now, when I do interviews around the world, I see that each country is part of a ‘WHO company’. WHO is no longer a democratic member organization, like the UN. The various governments form the basis of the ‘enterprise’. It logically agrees with what is happening now, since the ‘companies’ want money, business, and to control people. It’s like slavery. The taxes we pay, they go to governments that are subject to ‘the company’. Under the multinational organizations, such as GAVI.”

“GAVI, the World Bank and the WHO entered into a contract called IFFM: International Facility Finance for Immunization. Our countries, our people, pay to the WHO, the World Bank and GAVI to carry out their immunization programs. Which means vaccinating the entire population. When you see the plan from GAVI, you see that from 2012 to 2020 they have had this as a goal. But then it did not work, they had to create a pandemic.”

She said the pandemic was most certainly planned. ” You can see this from all the documents. Everyone can analyze them, they are in the open, right in front of our eyes.”


I urge you to read more – if not now, then later.

LINK: https://uncanceled.news/former-who-employee-dr-astrid-stuckelberger-a-pandemic-of-lies/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/HS15K


GAVI is only ONE of Bill Gates’ “hidden hand” organizations, by which he gets TWO TOP VOTES on any council or advisory board. GAVI allows Bill Gates to control a putative solution – vaccines.

There is another organization called CEPICoalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations – by which Bill Gates controls the PROBLEM for which VACCINES are allegedly the answer.

Note that Bill Gates is controlling both the problem and the solution – and if the solution CAUSES THE PROBLEM, then he has just achieved what he needs as the basis for a cyclic, sustainable grift.

Do you see how CEPI – about epidemics – is only pointing toward one solution – vaccines?

Subtle, but learn to be a grift-catcher, and it just jumps out at you.

Let’s take a closer look at CEPI.

Quite obviously, CEPI was all over Event 201 – although the SPONSORS were slightly different.

See how that works? SELF-DEALING. Gates is an absolute expert at it. He controls VACCINES, and he controls EPIDEMICS. The PROBLEM, and the “SOLUTION” – which, if one tells the big lie just right – can CAUSE THE PROBLEM TO LAST FOREVER.

It’s CYCLIC, and it’s SUSTAINABLE, and it’s the same GRIFT PRINCIPLE as the wrap-up smear, where one hand claims that the other hand is the “news source”.

See how the control arises? Read that bit about CEPI. “Collaboration with regulators”? What do you THINK is going to happen? Same thing. Eventually, it’s all one side, and there are no checks and balances.

Gates is such a sharp operator. SO much sharper than the chumps he fools.

But there is HOPE in THE TRUTH – and Gates’ organization DID produce a TRUTH-TELLER.


Why BAD VACCINES are Worse Than NO VACCINES and Why We Need to STOP MASS-VACCINATION

When I heard a vaccine expert – a veteran of GAVI – namely Geert Vanden Bossche – saying that vaccinating into the pandemic was a BAD IDEA, well THAT is when my ears perked up, WOLF-QUICK.

Take note of the fact that this guy IS NOT and never was the HEAD of GAVI. He was NEVER one of their top clowns. He just worked for them. The head of GAVI can NEVER say anything like this – something that doesn’t back up Bill Gates 100%.

But this guy Vanden Bossche, who worked in vaccines his whole life, including for Bill Gates’ own organization GAVI, has expert knowledge that Bill Gates is pushing the wrong solution in our current situation.

Well, THAT is interesting.

Now – listen to Vanden Bossche talk about VARIANTS and vaccinating CHILDREN, when Gates and “other organizations” (COUGH, COUGH) started pushing THAT.

Remember – this video is JUNE 1, 2021. Everything Geert said has come true with Delta, and it coming true AGAIN with Omicron, as he predicted. This guy understood directed evolution of variants from the very beginning, and how those variants are why we have to STOP VACCINATING.

There are other people – on Biden’s scientific advisory board – who also understand directed evolution of variants. The question is, what are they doing with that knowledge? Are they causing the problem? Or are they even looking at the solution? We’ll get to that later.

Also – just a warning – Geert speaks ANNOYINGLY SLOWLY – but also EXTREMELY CLEARLY.

This is a 10-minute video that takes 35 minutes to get out, but there is NO MISTAKING what he says.

So – was Geert right?


LINK: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/14/scientists-identify-young-vaccinated-people-as-source-for-omicron-variant/

Let’s bust out that tweet.

It’s behind a paywall, but this much shows through:

“Data from Denmark shows that just over 70 per cent of omicron cases have been among those younger than 40.”

If you now go back and listen to Geert, starting at around 28 minutes, and from there to the end of the video, you will see that he predicted exactly what is happening – that the disease under pressure of the bad vaccines would mutate and move into the [generally] unvaccinated younger people – AND – and this is important – that VACCINATING THEM WITH THE CURRENT SUB-OPTIMAL VACCINES IS THE EXACT WRONG THING TO DO.

Why?

BECAUSE IT WILL MAKE THINGS EVEN WORSE.

Oh.

And he explains HOW it will be worse. It could be as bad as a Marek’s disease scenario.

This is what people are NOT GETTING – that the current vaccines are NOT GOOD ENOUGH, and that they are CAUSING MORE PROBLEMS THAN THEY SOLVE.

That’s GREAT if you have a GRIFT that depends on the bad vaccines. It’s NOT SO GREAT if you’re somebody who actually cares about SOLVING problems (plural).

You know – like not making a new problem worse than the old one, and covering it up.

NOW – lo and behold – Joe Biden actually has two people advising him, on his board of science and technology advisers, who should care DEEPLY about this problem – if they actually ARE still scientists, and not pawns of industry and government.

Let’s meet them.


The Genetics and Evolution Girls Currently Advising Joe Biden

I kinda stumbled onto this story.

I was over on The National Pulse, looking at a link which ForGodandCountry gave me, when I found ANOTHER story in the sidebar.

LINK: https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/pfizer-board-member-is-former-facebook-director/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/T7tX2

Oh, the BOARDROOM INCEST gets better than that. That’s not even the beginning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sue_Desmond-Hellmann

This woman is the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Advising Joe Biden.

FTA:

Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellmann – a member of Pfizer Inc.’s Board of Directors – previously served as the Lead Independent Director at social media giant Facebook. The site has routinely censored posts relating to COVID-19 vaccines, with Pfizer in particular eliciting support from major corporate outlets.

Hellman was appointed to the social media platform’s board in March 2013 and served as it Lead Independent Director from June 2015 until October 30th 2019, shortly before the first reported case of COVID-19.

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook founder and CEO, said “Sue has been a wonderful and thoughtful voice on the board for six years, and I’m personally grateful to her for everything she has done for this company” in response to her departure.

“I remain positive about Facebook and the mission to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. Facebook’s Shareholders require a Board of Directors that is fully engaged and committed to address the critical issues confronting Facebook at this time,” Hellmann explained in reference to her role as the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

“Unfortunately, increasing demands from my CEO role, my extended family, and my own health make it no longer possible for me to commit the necessary time and energy required to properly serve Facebook and its shareholders,” she added in a public statement despite joining Pfizers board in 2020.

Amidst Hellmann’s tenure on the Pfizer board, Facebook has initiated campaigns to censor COVID-19 vaccine skeptics, as leaked internal documents from the company reveal algorithms aimed at “drastically reduc[ing] user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments.”


And much more.

Here is SOME of what I said to FG&C:


She links, at the highest levels:

Facebook
Pfizer
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Genentech
U.C. San. Fran.
U.C. Berkeley
AIDS research in Uganda
Rockefeller Foundation
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Federal Reserve Bank of San Fran
Global Health 2030

She’s behind a data initiative that basically reports individual patient data back to researchers to “accelerate research and learning blah-blah-blah”.

From Wikipedia:

Precision medicine based on Google Maps

In 2011, Desmond-Hellmann co-chaired a National Academy of Sciences committee that recommended creating a Google Maps-like data network aimed at developing more diagnostics and treatments tailored to individual patients — a concept known as “precision medicine”.[12] The so-called “knowledge network” would integrate the wealth of data emerging on the molecular basis of disease with information on environmental factors and patients’ electronic medical records and would allow scientists to share emerging research findings faster, thereby accelerating the development of tailored treatments. It also would allow clinicians to make more informed decisions about treatments, reduce health care costs and ultimately improve care.[13] The NAS report, titled “Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease”, was described by Keith Yamamoto, Vice Chancellor for Research at UCSF, as “the most important National Academy of Sciences Framework Analysis since that advisory body recommended that the United States go forward with the Human Genome Project”.[14]

In 2021, Desmond-Hellmann was appointed by President Joe Biden to the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), co-chaired by Frances Arnold, Eric Lander and Maria Zuber.


So – as a SIDEBAR – this woman was involved in the “freeing up” of electronic medical information which has basically DESTROYED medical privacy.

Which was GREAT for Democrat trial lawyers, by the way. Just today I got a call from AMBULANCE CHASERS based on a “confidential” diagnosis (nothing bad – don’t worry) that just went into my electronic records a few weeks ago.

I was SHOCKED that these people came on to me. It’s like Obamacare knifing my doctor in the back. The only way they knew, was access to my medical records. It should be absolutely illegal as hell for anybody – much less Democrat ambulance chasers – to know about that rare diagnosis and actually cold-call me to try to stir up a case. But yeah – destroying medical privacy in the name of helping researchers like her – that is just one example – a small example – of how “Inception” by the bad guys works. Find a smart dupe and get them to pimp an idea you need. Maybe even make them THINK they thought of it.

Free up the data with the EXCUSE of the good guys getting it, so that the BAD GUYS can do all kinds of things with it.

I know all about this – about being used as a PROXY to advance an idea because that proxy has respect as a scientist. It’s a nasty game.

Anyway….. [end of sidebar]


I am NOT of the opinion that this woman is as bad as someone like – say – Bill Gates. But I AM of the opinion that she’s very likely a politically correct “reliable board skirt” who always votes the way people are SUPPOSED to vote on board decisions. She’s Bilderberg fodder. She’s SMART and she GETS IT DONE. But she always does the “right thing” – the expected thing – the thing that somebody with more power and more control wants done.

So THIS woman is NEVER going to tell Joe Biden what Bill Gates doesn’t want him to hear.

But if there is any wonder why Joe Biden keeps trying to mandate vaccines, yeah, it’s because one of his science advisors is the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Pretty convenient.

Now – let’s move on to the other gal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Arnold

THIS ONE will not only understand what Geert Vanden Bossche is saying – she may actually respect that wisdom.


Frances Hamilton Arnold (born July 25, 1956)[1] is an American chemical engineer and Nobel Laureate. She is the Linus Pauling Professor of Chemical Engineering, Bioengineering and Biochemistry at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech). In 2018, she was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for pioneering the use of directed evolution to engineer enzymes.[2]

Since January 2021, she serves as an external co-chair of President Joe Biden‘s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST).[3]


So – THREE important points about Frances Arnold:

  • Pioneered the use of “pushed” evolution of organisms in the lab to make them useful
  • Nobel Prize winner
  • co-chair of Joe Biden’s “board” of science and technology advisors

So what’s up with this “directed evolution”?

From Wikipedia…..


Arnold is credited with pioneering the use of directed evolution to create enzymes (biochemical molecules—often proteins—that catalyze, or speed up, chemical reactions) with improved and/or novel functions.[25] The directed evolution strategy involves iterative rounds of mutagenesis and screening for proteins with improved functions and it has been used to create useful biological systems, including enzymesmetabolic pathwaysgenetic regulatory circuits, and organisms. In nature, evolution by natural selection can lead to proteins (including enzymes) well-suited to carry out biological tasks, but natural selection can only act on existing sequence variations (mutations) and typically occurs over long time periods.[26] Arnold speeds up the process by introducing mutations in the underlying sequences of proteins; she then tests these mutations’ effects. If a mutation improves the proteins’ function she can keep iterating the process to optimize it further. This strategy has broad implications because it can be used to design proteins for a wide variety of applications.[27] For example, she has used directed evolution to design enzymes that can be used to produce renewable fuels and pharmaceutical compounds with less harm to the environment.[25]

One advantage of directed evolution is that the mutations do not have to be completely random; instead, they can be random enough to discover unexplored potential, but not so random as to be inefficient. The number of possible mutation combinations is astronomical, but instead of just randomly trying to test as many as possible, she integrates her knowledge of biochemistry to narrow down the options, focusing on introducing mutations in areas of the protein that are likely to have the most positive effect on activity and avoiding areas in which mutations would likely be, at best, neutral and at worst, detrimental (such as disrupting proper protein folding).[25]


So – there you have it – “mutagenesis and screening“. In a way, it’s still just breeding horses or labradoodles, but much more technical and scientific.

If you suddenly think that, “Hey, this sounds a lot like what Fauci, Baric, Daszak and Bat Lady were doing” – you know – gain of function – well, that’s precisely it.

And think about this.

The SPIKE PROTEIN is a protein just like an ENZYME is protein. The only difference there, is that FAUCI and his gang were controlling the “directed evolution” of viruses making proteins toward whatever goals THEY thought useful, whereas Arnold was controlling the “directed evolution” of bacteria making proteins toward whatever goals SHE thought useful.

I remember when Arnold’s work was frequently showcased in Chemical & Engineering News. Yeah, a lot of it was feminist championing of a woman scientist by the C&EN media leftoids – BUT the fact is that Arnold’s work was very interesting stuff, and her interests and abilities always struck me as authentic – that she was NOT a “manufactured” science celebrity. She was showcased more than created.

One can argue about whether she deserved to be Beast-marked by the Dynamite Prize or not. Doesn’t really matter. To borrow from Trump, “Knowledge is the prize.”

In principle, this lady is capable of understanding and RESPECTING Geert Vanden Bossche’s arguments. If she’s going to disagree with him HONESTLY, then it will be for good reasons.

But that’s not the end of the story.

Let’s talk mutagenesis.


Remdesivir and Molnupiravir as Mutagens

Now I’m not saying that ALL of these new COVID drugs are human mutagens or teratogens. In fact, most likely, NONE of them are. The Pfizer drug is not a mutagen as far as I know – but then that drug is actually a binary drug, and one of THOSE two drugs is an established AIDS drug, which is quite fishy in light of VAIDS.

What I am saying is that TWO of these drugs are PROVEN viral mutagens.

Sorta like that critical step in Frances Arnold’s work.

So are we trying to ACCELERATE the appearance of variants? Are we consciously trying to CHANGE how or how fast they vary? Is SOMEBODY consciously trying to change how or how fast they vary?

Here is where I talked about the apparent public health contradiction of using drugs like molnupiravir and remdesivir on a virus which mutates into “variants of concern” before:


The Molnupiravir Contradiction

Why would we mass treat a virus with a drug which forces the virus to mutate, when mutation is how the virus creates new variants that reinfect the vaccinated? Before I explain the title contradiction, let me start with an admission. Most of my life, I have been very friendly with the pharmaceutical industry. I …


In that blog post, I explained that (1) remdesivir has been PROVEN to “push” SARS-CoV-2 toward evolution of variants, including “variants of concern”, and (2) molnupiravir works on the principle of “mutation catastrophe” in the SARS-CoV-2 reproductive process, so it likely does the same thing even more.

So are we “doing the Arnold” or what?

I will leave that up to others to answer.

Let me close instead with one more great article which summarizes where we are.

It’s Vanden Bossche without Vanden Bossche.


Eugyppius & The Conservation of Corona

If you have not found this anonymous German dude’s substack account, you need to be watching it. It’s almost better than Alex Berenson’s account, which is a pretty hard thing to do.

Among several great posts, this one is critical.

Let me just quote the first few paragraphs.

FTA:

The ascendancy of more transmissible (and possibly also more pathogenic) Delta strains is a consequence of the worldwide vaccination campaign. This is now the most salient and the most important side-effect of our vaccines. They elicit antibodies that select for more aggressive SARS-2 lineages, which escape vaccine-induced immunity by replicating in the lungs of infected people faster and earlier.

All our evidence is that the alpha (Kent) and delta (Indian) lineages emerged at the same time, in September or October 2020. Delta was more aggressive than alpha, but alpha had the upper hand until vaccines killed it off. Probably, Delta is too aggressive in completely unvaccinated populations, causing severe illness before very many of its hosts can do much spreading.

Consider the entirely typical case of my country, Germany. Most first doses here were administered over the course of nine weeks, from early April to early July. In precisely this period, Delta began its rise to absolute dominance. The genetic diversity of SARS-2 has been totally destroyed in Germany and everywhere else too.

What you see happening to Alpha in this chart, is what the vaccines were supposed to do to Corona as a whole. But then it was Corona’s move, and Delta is the hand it played.

Nothing about how the pandemic plays out now can be disentangled from the vaccines. The more aggressive spread of Delta among the unvaccinated is as much a part of this campaign, as its continued spread among the vaccinated. We have totally changed the environment in which SARS-2 circulates, and in response SARS-2 has become more transmissible and more volatile across the board.

MORE: https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/the-conservation-of-corona

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/vhrEk


SO – have I convinced you of the obvious? I’m convinced.

DA RONA-COASTA IS POWAHED BY DA VAXX.

It’s bloody obvious.

So are they incompetent or evil? Or maybe both?

Your call. I’m just watching from the cheap seats.

And getting ready for the Biden Depression.

Cheers, Eugyppius and Geert. You guys get da Woof Prize.

W

Ten Fresh Reasons for You, Your Friends, and Your Loved Ones to NOT Get the HAXXINE

Here we go.


https://futurism.com/neoscope/potential-covid19-vaccine-hacks-dna-build-immunity

10. It’s a “Haxxine”

A lot of people say that “it’s not a vaccine”, and while I actually LIKE the fact that the CDC – for BAD REASONS – made a GOOD CHANGE (in my opinion) in the definition of vaccines, I am forced to admit that the CDC DEMOCRATS did the KNAVISH DEMOCRAT THING and “changed the rules”, which Democrats always do, instead of confronting the badness of the bad vaccines they want to force on everybody, and thus are stupidly committed to defending.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm

Note that the CDC definition change ALLOWS me to call these things BAD VACCINES, because the new definition allows both qualitative and quantitative expectations on vaccine performance.

But I am going beyond just calling them bad vaccines. I did a knavish thing back, and created (possibly for the second or third time – who knows?) a NEW NAME that can be used to distinguish mRNA virus-like particle and cDNA viral vector “vaccines” from the much more standard and understood protein and glycoprotein antigen vaccines which would have VERY LIKELY been much safer and more trustworthy than the vaccines we got.

THUS – I’m calling these things “haxxines” – precisely because they are GENETIC HACKS. One can easily call them “genetic vaccines”, but by calling them “genetic hacks”, “haccines”, or most especially “haxxines“, one gets to the root problem, from the view of scientists and programmers. These things are FAST HACKS – they’re untried methods – unproven experimental fixes – and more than that, they are LITERALLY “genetic hacks”.

You’ve heard of “life hacks”, so you know what I’m talking about.

“Hacks” tend to have a kind of “go with the flow” and “uncontrolled outcome” quality, which creates simplicity and elegance in the overall method, but the downsides of “premature ability” and “unforeseen but expectable consequences” loom VERY large.

In other words, “hacks” give Jimmy Olson the Superman abilities he probably shouldn’t have right now, and bad things can and do result.

There is NO WAY around the truth of things. These vaccines are GENETIC HACKS. I look at the methodology of what was done, and what Pfizer and Moderna are HIDING, and I can tell.

HACKS!!!

Now, “hacking” is how a lot of things are “tried and discovered” in science and programming. I am as guilty as any other scientist or programmer of having PROUDLY developed many beautiful hacks that saved people lots of time, money, and effort. Some of those hacks are still in use, because over time they gained trust and certainty. Vaccination ITSELF is a beautiful HACK that saved millions of lives. The easy cases – stuff like rabies and smallpox – are particularly awesome results.

Hell – IVERMECTIN IS A HUGE HACK!

It’s a great hack! It’s an awesome hack, because one of the HACKED ELEMENTS is that the therapeutic margin is INSANELY LARGE. The hack isn’t GREAT, but the hack can’t screw up!

These kinds of “safe hacks” rarely come along. Ivermectin is so awesome precisely because it’s an antiviral HACK.

SO – don’t consider this as much “anti-vaccine” as PRO-TRUTH. These hacky vaccines are hacky as hell, and absolutely UN-MANDATABLE, in my opinion as a scientist. Mandating a HACK is almost always STUPID. But almost all hacks lead to something good, if you TREAT THE DAMN THING AS A HACK.

“Haxxines”. Be careful with the damn things. They’re HACKY. Are you sure you want to take one? Not me. These don’t look like a “great hack”. They look like a BAD HACK that’s gonna need a lot of fixing.

And I say that as somebody who had to FIX a lot of other people’s HACKS.

OK? Good.


9. Stillbirths and Miscarriages

The Gateway Pundit reminds us that there appears to be a HUGE jump in miscarriages, stillbirths, and “uterine dumps” after the haxxine. It’s NOT just obvious in the VAERS data – the facts are slipping out thanks to honest healthcare workers.

The HORROR is that most hospital administrations seem to be hiding the numbers.

(VIDEO) Doctor Warns Stillbirths Are Rampant Among Fully Vaccinated Mothers, Launches Investigation

December 11, 2021, 12:00 pm
by Alicia Powe

You have to click on this link above and look at the numbers. They’re shocking even to non-scientists, but to a scientist, this SHOULD be obvious as hell.

Look – I’m going to be very straight with you. The numbers are absolutely scary, because they are “anecdotal but precise and outside the range where any kind of error matters”. These are very often “two or more orders of magnitude things”. If you don’t see them, you’re bloody blind, or trying very hard not to see them.

If this happened for any other reason than the vaccine – something like “water pollution” or a “serial killer nurse in hospitals”, the authorities in Canada where this was documented would be FREAKING. But let’s be real – because if it’s the haxxine, it’s THEIR POLICY, and so suddenly they act like they don’t know what’s going on.

And the media just goes along with the insane pretense of ignorance.

What we’re talking about is a situation where numbers of stillbirths jumped by TWO ORDERS of magnitude – from less than ten to nearly 100 in the same timeframe – AND we have a likely suspect that OTHER evidence supports.

Scientifically, it’s a NO DAMN BRAINER.

  • The numbers are STARK and MASSIVE
  • The number one suspect MUST BE vaccination
  • The haxxine has demonstrated proper suspect actions
  • The haxxine has awesome explanatory mechanisms
  • The haxxine makers HID THE EXPLANATORY DATA
  • The haxxine makers have been caught hiding and lying before

This is not hard. This is where the audience SCREAMS AT COLUMBO. And they scream at Columbo, because he’s still playing dumb, and hasn’t yet pointed his good eye at the suspect, and his cigar at the roof, and said “One more thing, Mrs. Psaki.”

I cannot for the life of me understand why the CDC/FDA/DNC complex is MANDATING a bad vaccine for a COLD – a vaccine that so obviously causes stillbirths – unless that’s the plan.

Well, we know Democrats like abortion, and they like contraception, and this vaccine is a bit like a lottery halfway between them, and – damn, Mrs. Psaki – THAT SURE MAKES SENSE.

Don’t take the haxxine if you’re pregnant, or ever planning to get pregnant. Just don’t. It’s just stupid.

OK?

Something is VERY WRONG with this vaccine, and just because the people who would be hurt by the admission won’t admit it, doesn’t mean there isn’t something very wrong with the vaccine.

I mean haxxine.


8. Your Kid Could Get a “Toxic Batch” of the Pfizer Vaccine.

If you’re thinking of vaccinating your kids, you need to be aware of the fact that the Pfizer vaccine for kids appears to have a “toxic batch problem” very similar to the adult vaccine.

Not only is the number of adverse outcome events in children absolutely unacceptable, in my opinion – there seems to be a systematic problem with the vaccine which has NOT been identified.

I definitely recommend reading THIS article.

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/12/medicine-regulators-harming-children-with-dangerous-batches-of-covid-vaccine/

Now, I’m going to be completely blunt here. IGNORING all of the possibilities of long-term damage, like myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke, sterility, etc., and JUST looking at “immediate reactions to the Pfizer COVID vaccine”, and then comparing THOSE reactions to most childhood vaccines, which are absolutely DWARFED in VAERS by the Pfizer numbers, I don’t think there is any way that I would vaccinate a young child, older child, teen or young adult with this vaccine.

It’s just POINTLESS. The risks from the disease itself to those cohorts are absolutely minuscule and mild, but the risks from the vaccine are definite and serious – and FAR WORSE than EVERY other vaccine. In fact, they’re far worse than historic bad vaccines that got withdrawn.

It is STUPID to vaccinate your kid – particularly just because DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS say so. They don’t have good reasons – they’re just “order-followers” like Nazis. And if you can’t see THAT – well, think what that means. Are YOU a stupid “order-following” Nazi?

I simply find it stupid to take needless risks like this – that don’t even offer FUN as a reward. Buy your kid a higher-quality bicycle helmet. Teach them how to swim. Take them hiking and climbing and skating. There are thousands of stupid fun things that still make sense. This vaccine does not.

It makes sense for Pfizer and the politicians it bribes. That’s about it.


7. Original Antigenic Sin is a Real and Very Serious Reason to Stop Vaccinating Everyone

That is actually the title of a very interesting substack blog post explaining TWO recent scientific papers. You can find links to the papers in the blog post.

LINK: https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/original-antigenic-sin-is-a-real

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/Ivs6f

This excellent post spends most of its effort explaining the papers, which largely show how prior antibody immunity to ANY human coronavirus other than the particular strain in question, tends to HURT immunity to the ONE in question.

Basically, prior coronavirus exposure MISLEADS antibody response to later coronavirus infection.

Thus, the idea of “original antigenic sin” is that what your immune system initially “imprints” on, will determine what it does later, and if it imprints on the wrong thing, it will lead to wrong responses.

What this tells us, is that natural immunity which does NOT use OLD PLAYBOOKS is what wins against coronaviruses, but the VACCINES are always OLD SPECIFIC PLAYBOOKS, and therefore not very good.

Here is the author, eugyppius.


FTA:

The severity of Corona infection varies wildly across the population. Children have generally mild or asymptomatic infections, while adults have a wide range of responses. Everyone always assumed that cross-immunity was part of the answer to this conundrum. The problem is that – at least as far as antibodies go – it is shaping up to be a not very reassuring part of that answer. The innate and non-specific immune response of children looks more and more like a big part of the reason they are spared severe infection. Adults with immune systems tightly calibrated to the common human coronaviruses, meanwhile, often have more severe symptoms. They suffer from Original Antigenic Sin.

Over 4.2 billion people across the earth have received at least one dose of vaccine against SARS-2. The majority of these vaccines have elicited antibodies only against an early form of the spike protein that is no longer in circulation.

This would seem to be one reason why many western countries with high vaccination rates appear to have locked themselves into an indefinite phase of heightened SARS-2 transmission. In the United Kingdom, 96% of adults have antibodies to the spike protein – most of these first acquired by vaccination. Shortly after they concluded their vaccination campaign, cases skyrocketed, and they have remained high ever since.

Original Antigenic Sin is a real phenomenon. It seems not only to permanently influence the immune response to the spike protein itself, but also to inhibit the development of antibodies to other SARS-2 proteins. A worst case scenario, would be a future spike mutation that entirely escapes the anti-spike antibodies elicited by our vaccines. In this case, it seems possible that many vaccinated people will be stuck with permanently suboptimal immune responses. If Omicron is indeed circulating primarily among the vaccinated, as some data suggests, this would seem to be one possibly reason why. These concerns are particularly acute in the case of children, who may well be exposed to the risk of very serious illness in the future, if vaccination permanently misdirects their immune system.


Wolf again.

“Misdirection” is the word we are looking for here. This allows us to go beyond the idea of “original antigenic sin”, to expand the idea to “subsequent antigenic sin”.

EVERY exposure from birth to death – vaccine, infectious disease, or natural (sub-infective) – has the potential to mislead our immune systems in later exposures, and there is no reason to think that Fauci or Big Pharma are going to come up with vaccines that are going to “lead smarter” than our highly evolved natural immune systems, in my scientific opinion.

Basically, it’s as if coronaviruses are excellent attacking boxers which (by evolutionary memory) remember the jabs and punches that “got through” before, and if you waste energy making any of those old moves, you will be “rope-a-doped” by the coronavirus.

Thus, like the viruses, WE have “evolved memory” of how to combat shape-shifters, with our own shape-shifting response, which looks for NEW ATTACKS – not old ones.

What this says to me is that Fauci’s “yesterday’s news” antibody-based vaccine strategy is COMPLETELY WRONG.

One of the things I’ve noticed is Fauci’s reluctance to move on from Original Wuhan vaccines. Yes, we drop our jaws at the mere MENTION of vaccines “tailored” to newer variants, and I totally get the idea of warning about the Fauci “rona-coaster”. I absolutely agree that Fauci is dangling that clearly-planned strategy in front of us as a future narrative talking point.

LINK: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/08/whoot-there-it-is-anthony-fauci-says-we-are-prepared-to-start-delivering-variant-specific-booster-vaccines/

BUT – at the same time – Fauci seems really intent on pushing vaccination with permanently and massively sub-optimal out-of-date vaccines, which are definitely MISLEADING our immune systems.

Thus, it strikes me that Fauci is trying to get the “worst of both worlds”. He’s not treating GOOD, HIGHLY CURRENT vaccine specificity with the seriousness it deserves. Rather, he is trying to MILK the bad, delta-failing vaccines for all they’re worth.

Something is WRONG here. I think a lot of it has to do with Fauci’s “funding-centric” view of public health. I think he has a distorted set of priorities, based on the extreme compromises that he has made with the industry. It explains remdesivir, and it explains these bad, out-of-date vaccines.

But the bottom line is this. There is clearly more here than Fauci understands, and mandating these CONFIRMED immunity-misleading vaccines over natural immunity is wrong, and possibly – quite possibly – a kind of murderous hubris.


6. The Haxxines Appear to Offer No Benefit When Viewed from All-Cause Mortality

This is a subtle point, but it’s a very effective argument with me, because it does not let anything escape. No matter how hidden the effects – positive or negative – of the vaccines, in the end, all-cause mortality numbers that don’t shift tell me that the vaccines simply aren’t working as a public health policy.

LINK: https://beckernews.com/exclusive-its-game-over-for-the-cdc-if-these-death-rates-hold-true-43385/

People are very likely trading some slight improvement in risk of death from COVID, for some slight increase in risk of death from haxxine side effects.

Overall? They’re just not doing much good.

No thanks. Not worth it. Demand BETTER VACCINES. Or maybe even a different solution.


5. Vaccination Against Wuhan Made People More Susceptible to Infection by Beta, Gamma, and Delta (But Not Alpha) Variants in the Netherlands

I’m just reporting the study, which is BLUNT evidence of “vaccine-enhanced infection”, a.k.a. VEI.

We will talk more about VEI below, and where it may come from.

TITLE: Increased risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 Beta, Gamma, and Delta variant compared to Alpha variant in vaccinated individuals

LINK: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.24.21266735v1.full-text

ABSTRACT: The extent to which severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC) break through infection- or vaccine-induced immunity is not well understood. Here, we analyze 28,578 sequenced SARS-CoV-2 samples from individuals with known immune status obtained through national community testing in the Netherlands from March to August 2021. We find evidence for an increased risk of infection by the Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), or Delta (B.1.617.2) variants compared to the Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant after vaccination. No clear differences were found between vaccines. However, the effect was larger in the first 14-59 days after complete vaccination compared to 60 days and longer. In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with Beta, Gamma or Delta variants relative to Alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity.

I want to emphasize that last sentence:

In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with Beta, Gamma or Delta variants relative to Alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity.

So, according to this, I made the right choice, not getting vaccinated, in terms of resisting infection with the delta variant. Delta eventually got me, but it likely would have gotten me SOONER if I’d gotten the vaccine – at least that is the prediction I would make based on the results of this study.

Hmmmmmm.


4. Childhood Deaths are Going Up Since They Started Getting The Haxxine

I want to scream “XXXXING MURDERERS”, but I will resist. For now.

TITLE: Deaths among Children are 44% higher than the 5-year-average since they were offered the Covid-19 Vaccine according to ONS data

LINK: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/24/child-deaths-increasing-since-offered-covid-vaccine/

Yeah, it’s not PROOF, but GOOD GRIEF – it’s one of the most dangerous “correlations that looks a hell of a lot like causation” that I’ve seen in a while.

What if Trump was right, and kids should not be getting this vaccine?

Mandating it? OBVIOUSLY wrong.

I would say this is close to the point where non-violent solutions not only run out of justification, but may in fact be viewed as collaboration with evil.

This is where Christ turns into a “chucker of millstones like asteroids”. This ain’t “smiley Jesus” stuff.

Something is VERY wrong with not only our criminal DOJ, but even with our alleged “white hats” if they’re protecting this shit, worse still, mandating it.


3. COVID Recoverees Are Statistically Better Off Avoiding the Jabs

Karl Denninger was all over this one. Title: “Debate Is Over Folks; Facts Came In”.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244442

I will start by briefly summarizing what Karl ends up saying, which is complicated (you will see).

Karl looked at the pre-print of a HUGE scientific study in Israel.

The title of the study is “Protection and waning of natural and hybrid COVID-19 immunity“.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.04.21267114v1.full.pdf

There will likely be a lot of arguments over what the results mean, and they will depend upon what your “metrics of success” are.

Karl is of the same opinion as me, that ONLY SEVERE OUTCOMES MATTER with COVID-19. If you get sick and recover, and don’t die or go to the hospital, it’s all OK. Even better if you get good immunity which staves off the NEXT illness out of the deal.

Based on that opinion, the results here would argue that OLDER people who have already gotten the disease, are better off NOT GETTING THE VACCINE, in order to avoid severe outcomes.

I mean haxxine. Whatever.

You will have lower risks if you just stay on the natural immunity track. This is what I figured from all the early studies of COVID-19. It is part of my caution toward vaccines which were explicitly NOT TESTED on recoverees, who were REMOVED from the study populations by the drug companies.

The data is complex and it’s easy to slice it different ways. Here is Karl’s take:


FTA

To summarize:

  • Natural immunity is more-protective than vaccination and not a little either.  It is more than double the effective protection beyond the first two months after being vaccinated.  In other words being jabbed not only is a poor second choice in terms of generating immunity it cannot be considered comparable in any way.
  • In the younger cohorts being jabbed beats being recovered for severe outcomes if you get infected.  But when adjusted for odds of infection it loses, badly, beyond the first two months.  This is very important because the odds of a severe outcome for a young person are quite low in the first place.  In short there is a clean argument that a young person, due to the decay of immunity from the jabs, is better off being infected as their immunity is more-durable and on an infection-risk adjusted basis if previously infected they are less-likely, by quite a lot, to have a severe outcome on a second encounter.  This of course ignores early treatment that may reduce severe outcome risk — which nobody who is other than desirous of a large body count would ignore.  We haven’t ignored early treatment on purpose have we?
  • While it is is true that being jabbed after or before infection does indeed reduce the risk of being infected with a third immunity-generating event if you do get infected it has demonstrated negative effectiveness in the recovered cohort when it comes to severe outcomes.  It will be very interesting to see how this plays as time goes on because many of these infections occurred quite-recently with Delta and given the known much slower decay of immunity from infection than vaccination there is a confounding factor that, in combination with the low event count, leaves us with a jury that is still out in this specific case.
  • Given that vaccination after infection increases the risk of severe outcomes over someone with natural immunity if you get a second infection being vaccinated after infection is likely harmful, and not a little either.  Getting infected again after infection and then vaccination is a third immunity-generating event.  There is no data on this via the natural route (that is, infected, recovered, infected again and recovered, and then infected a third time.)  Given the deterioration in protection from severe outcome if infected after recovery and then vaccination, which is quite significant for all except the youngest cohort, it is likely that being infected twice not only produces superior resistance to infection it also avoids the severe outcome risk increase.

Note that none of this includes the risk from the jabs themselves.  To the mortality and morbidity (“severe” outcomes) you must also add that which comes directly from the medication, since no drug is ever without said risks.

What is clear is that natural immunity is superior both in terms of protection from repeat infection and from severe outcomes. In addition being boosted had negative or no effectiveness in preventing severe outcomes among everyone except those under 40, where there were too few events to get clean statistical evidence.  This implies that vaccinated immunity, when “refreshed”, does not alter the course of a breakthrough infection yet that was the remaining leg on which the argument rested, that it prevented severe outcomes.  That should be evident in the data with a significant decrease in severe outcomes across all cohorts and it is not.

What’s worse is that a third event (infection) after recovering and then being jabbed led to increases in severe disease risk if you got a breakthrough, and quite-materially so, over simple recovery.

This argues that jabbing a recovered person, while it may produce apparent superior resistance to infection, is in fact worthless or worse because when adjusted for the severe event risk the reinfection and severe outcome risk is actually HIGHER if you got vaccinated after being infected.

And finally this data also demonstrates that being infected after vaccination produces a materially faster immunity decay than infection alone which is solid evidence that vaccination in fact materially impairs the natural immunity process.  That is, aside from direct side effect risk it screws your natural immunity duration when, not if, you get infected after being vaccinated anyway.


WOLF again.

Denninger believes that the results indicate something called VEIvaccine-enhanced infection.

VEI is basically a broader category that includes ADE – antibody-dependent enhancement – but it doesn’t restrict the disease-enhancing mechanism to antibodies, even though in any complex mechanism, some sort of positive or negative failure by antibodies is almost assuredly involved. Thus, by REMOVING antibodies from the name, VEI prevents arguments from getting sidetracked as to exactly WHY the vaccines are enhancing subsequent infections. VEI means you gave a vaccine which made a subsequent infection WORSE. You can figure out why and whether it’s ADE later.

NOW – let me start off with a CRITICAL SIDEBAR on VEI and where it likely comes from.


FREAKY SIDEBAR ON VEI AND FAUCI’S DIRECT INVOLVEMENT IN ITS APPEARANCE IN BOTH COVID-19 AND VACCINES THEREOF

Denninger’s last point – that vaccination is shown here to “mess up” natural immunity to COVID – doesn’t even get into the very real likelihood that vaccination is ALSO messing up natural immunity to other diseases and possibly cancers. THAT is the stuff that Drs. Cole and Thompson have found in the jabbed. There’s more new evidence of VEI in scientific papers (shocking evidence, actually) which Denninger has covered elsewhere, but set that aside for later. It’s small potatoes compared to the following.

Decreased general immunity TO all diseases and cancers, CAUSED by both the disease and even more so by the vaccines, SEEMS to be one of the huge RISKS (and this actually happened) of having inserted sequences for HIV features into the spike protein during “Bat Woman’s” research, and then by necessity or not, sneakily / stupidly / cunningly, bringing those same features into the vaccines, which – bizarrely – is something that ANTHONY FAUCI apparently holds patents to.

And all of this stuff is related to things that Fauci and his buddies LIED ABOUT and DENIED.

And all of this stuff is stuff that “DRASTIC” missed by a mile, by strawmanning away from it. It’s obvious as hell now why DRASTIC was “supported” by CIA/WaPo, Twitter, and all the usual scoundrels. They’re the “Plan B” to hide Fauci’s and China’s and WEF’s murderous felonies, by “snopesing” us with an accidental misdemeanor that leaves out the more shocking horrors that bring down puppet governments.

Yes. You heard that right. Karen Kingston found this stuff. And I had to watch what she said FIVE TIMES to fully GRASP and ACCEPT what she is saying. I thought she might be exaggerating or leaving out something – some part of this. She’s not. The simple FACTS alone are SHOCKING.


SIDEBAR WITHIN A SIDEBAR

I don’t know if you ever saw the movie Impostor with Gary Sinise, which is based on a short story by Philip K. Dick, but my immediate reaction was the question “Is Anthony Fauci some kind of ‘impostor’ whose goal is to destroy humans on this planet?” I’m not kidding. That was my first thought. Because what he’s doing sure seems like a great way to attack intelligent life on this planet. Just sayin’.


OK – has your jaw dropped yet? Good. It should. I’ll just give you the links and the video. Stew Peters doesn’t really let Karen Kingston explain this in the detail it deserves, so she says things with a brevity that allows for unwarranted doubts to fester.

Karen Kingston needs an hour on OAN with somebody like me or Kirsch or Malone or Denninger to explain things, but she has a huge story here.

Fauci and his crew of science grifters consciously put HIV molecular features [which could, of course, risk HIV-like outcomes] into the spike protein of the more communicable and more dangerous disease, which risked exactly what we are experiencing with the disease, and they didn’t just do it knowingly (as you can READ FROM THE LITERATURE) – they took out patents on doing the same features in vaccines, which makes THEM riskier of the same dangers. And then of course they lied about all of that and tried to cover it up. And to top it off, they supposedly changed patent wording to include accidental and intentional releases for some kind of patentability reason, which makes me wonder what the hell is going on in the Patent Office as well.

And remember those Indian scientists at the beginning who spotted those four “HIV inserts”? Which Fauci and company forced the journal to retract? Yeah, that’s what we’re talking about. That science makes sense now. The evidence is now in VAERS. The evidence is in the patents. THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND THEN THEY LIED ABOUT IT AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.

What the HELL!!!

THIS IS THE GREATEST SCIENTIFIC SCANDAL IN HISTORY.

LINK: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/12/fauci-patent-vaxxed-induced-aids-biotech-analyst-hiv-glycoprotein-120-contained-in-vaxx/

LINK: https://rumble.com/vqhqop-fauci-patent-vaxxed-induced-aids-biotech-analyst-hiv-glycoprotein-120-conta.html

LINK: https://brandnewtube.com/watch/karen-kingston-fauci-patent-vaxxed-induced-aids-hiv-glycoprotein-120-contained-in-vaxx_r14CHFmoubcfHla.html

And oh, yeah, there is an Israeli study that shows worse outcomes in the vaccinated.

NEXT.


2. An Israeli In-Depth Study of a Breakthrough Exposure Outbreak Incident Showed Worse Outcomes For The Vaccinated

This is one that Denninger posted about EARLIER in relation to VEI. And unlike some cases where he hyperventilates, in this case, IMO, it’s MUCH WORSE than Denninger reported.

Going to the ACTUAL PAPERS – if you’re used to reading scientific papers – proved MORE SHOCKING than what Denninger said.

Denninger: Simply Put: It DOES NOT WORK

The Lancet: The epidemiological relevance of the COVID-19-vaccinated population is increasing

Israeli Letter: Nosocomial outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a highly vaccinated population, Israel, July 2021

If you look at this, what you see is that the people who were unvaccinated got off much better than the vaccinated. It’s VERY obvious. You can just read it for yourselves – any of those links.

Denninger is able to rant more. Start off with him.

In The Lancet, it’s just mentioned, but the authors are trying, as much as they can get away with in a controlled science press, to WARN people that it’s really a “pandemic of the vaccinated” now.

And in the original Israeli paper, they are also trying very CAREFULLY to warn people that it’s a WORSE PANDEMIC for the vaccinated.

And ALL OF THAT leads me to a BLOG POST where somebody named Herschel Smith spotted something very, very, very telling.

I had no idea WHY Pfizer was doing what they are doing, by not supplying their new COVID drug as a single compound, but rather in a FORCED combination with an AIDS drug.

Well, now THAT all makes sense.


1. Pfizer May Be Sneaking Ritonavir (AIDS Drug) into its COVID Pill To Cover Up Vaccine-Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (VAIDS)

I have no idea if the guy who wrote this blog post, which is ABOUT Denninger’s post on the Israeli letter, is the one who figured this out, or if he just read the idea somewhere else. All I know is that I absolutely think he’s right.

Herschel Smith: The Vaccines Make Everything Worse


FTA:

We’ve extensively discussed the damage the vaccine is doing to the immune system, the increased risk of cancer, the pericarditis, and the blood clots and hemorrhaging associated with the shots.  Put simply, its side effects are awful.  But before that is even considered, they simply don’t work.  This from Karl Denninger.

Oops….

In Israel a nosocomial outbreak was reported involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members. The source was a fully vaccinated COVID-19 patient. The vaccination rate was 96.2% among all exposed individuals (151 healthcare workers and 97 patients). Fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died, the two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease [[4]]

Not just oops, VEI.

Vaccine Enhanced Infections.

This is in The Lancet, a high-quality prestigious medical journal.

Except that I don’t think it’s oops.  I think all of this was intended.

See also this.  Israel is in real trouble with a veritable blizzard of sickness.  Make sure not to miss the fact that the new Pfizer Covid pill has HIV medication in it.

Not, of course, to treat the virus, but to treat the effects of the vaccine.

That’s quite a scam, yes?  Develop a shot that harms you for a disease your colleague (Fauci) developed, and then develop the drug that allegedly will make you better from the harm you perpetrated on people to begin with.


Wolf again.

Yes – the Pfizer drug PAXLOVID (good GRIEF – what focus group created THAT name?) includes both a COVID protease inhibitor, PF-07321332, and an older AIDS drug, ritonavir.

Now – Pfizer states a plausible reason to include the HIV drug ritonavir – namely to shut down liver metabolism to increase the concentration of the ACTUAL anti-COVID protease inhibitor PF-07321332.

But really, this just sounds like a paper-thin justification for administering an HIV drug to cover up the HIV-related consequences of the Pfizer vaccine, which stupidly incorporated all of the HIV problems of the Fauci-Wuhan-created SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which stupidly included all the problems of AIDS. Unless it’s not stupidly, but diabolically. Which is even worse. Bloody impostor!

It’s just more drugs, and MORE DRUGS, covering up one “error” with ONE MORE “ERROR”.

Or was this forseeable stuff ever an error to begin with? They KEEP DOING THE WRONG THING. OVER AND OVER. AGAIN AND AGAIN.

As you can see below, this hepatic shutdown action of ritonavir has a long list of potentially dire consequences, much like remdesivir, which is also basically a kidney and liver toxin.

I personally think this is all quite beyond suspicious as hell.

And after all of this crap, why that damned bureaucrat millionaire Fauci is still in his job is beyond me.


So there you have it.

Once you understand that they are selling the disease, the cure, and the cover-up, you can safely say that you want NONE OF THEM.

I want to see Anthony Fauci and Albert Bourla arrested and tried.

That’s what I want. We can talk about vaccines again after that happens.

Until that happens, I won’t take ’em. NOT A ONE.

W

Science vs. Anti-Science: Conservation of Spike Protein Biochemistry vs. Democrat Media Voodoo of Post-Pandemic Stress

As a young science student in the 1970s, I never would have thought that I would have to correct the American and global media over an issue of late 19th century basic science, but yet, here we are.

When basic theories of MATTER and CHEMISTRY proved that “Compound A created by one route has the same properties as compound A created by a different route”, science got a hold of a very simple but very revolutionary idea – that substances had assignable responsibilities for things. Further still, that we could PROVE THIS, and then use it in both diagnosis and cures.

This was the beginnings of the scientific theory of DRUGS and PHARMACEUTICALS.

I was PART OF THIS INDUSTRY. I learned about its history. I marveled at its beautiful truth.

But yet NOW – shamefully – to defend a corrupt pharmaceutical industry that literally controls our government, on behalf of other governments, our media will without shame DENY the most basic truths about how drugs and biochemicals work.

What is even MORE SHAMEFUL is that the global pharmaceutical industry KNOWS that I’m right – and yet in CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE, they allow the idiot media to defend them with insanity that THEY THEMSELVES swept away 150 years ago.

SO – what I am going to do here is to SHAME OUR MEDIA – our unscientific media – for embracing VOODOO theories of disease, as 150-year-old BASIC SCIENCE stares them in the face.


Let me begin by stating the bottom line right up front.

Anybody who thinks that cardiovascular pathology in recipients of spike protein vaccines is due to anything other than those very same spike protein antigens – which were BORROWED FROM THE DISEASE that causes the very same cardiovascular pathology – is denying the most basic science of drugs and disease.

Let me state that just a little MORE clearly.

It is impossible for vaccines to use a known molecular pathogen as an antigen, and NOT engender risk of pathogenicity due to that very same molecular pathogen.

Do you understand this?

If you take a poison to gain immunity to the poison, and you suffer poisoning typical of the poison, it was probably the poison, and probably not “stress”.

Good GOD – I cannot believe that I actually have to SAY THIS to adults in America in 2021, almost 2022.

But lets keep beating this into mushy skulls……

  • COVID-19 does bad cardiovascular things
  • COVID-19 virus has a spike protein
  • the spike protein is how COVID-19 does the cardiovascular bad things
  • the spike protein is how the vaccines “pretend” to be COVID-19
  • the spike protein by itself does the cardiovascular bad things
  • vaccines CREATING spike protein can thus do the cardiovascular bad things

This is actually very simple, because it’s OLD science.

Here is how we might play it out with the poisonous protein “ricin”.

  • ricin is a poisonous protein
  • we could try to make a vaccine against ricin, using ricin
  • we could give people an mRNA vaccine that “makes” ricin in their cells
  • the recipients would then have antibodies against ricin
  • some people who would get the vaccine would get ricin poisoning
  • the idea that the ricin poisoning was due to “stress” would be absurd

Are you starting to see this?

TO HYPOTHESIZE that GIVING a poison to a person, where the recipient then GETS poisoning typical of that poison, is not in fact RESPONSIBLE for causing the poisoning typical of the poison you just gave the person, is NUTS.

Actually, it’s beyond that – it’s NUCKING FUTS.

To hypothesize that there is some mysterious “stress” that causes EXPECTED SIDE EFFECTS from what we just gave the person, is so ridiculous, I could actually call upon the NIH to publicly CONDEMN major media for going along with this stuff – except for one thing.

The pharmaceutical companies that CONTROL the NIH AND the media are in fact the ones that make the poison and sell the product, and are trying to deny the obvious side effects of the poison.

WELL THAT’S GREAT.

Well, at least *I* spoke the truth.

Now – you may be wondering why I have not even pointed to a REFERENCE yet.

Well, not only is this stuff that EVERY college graduate should understand – MOST high school graduates should understand it, too.

In fact, anybody who has taken a fucking aspirin should understand this.

“If you take aspirin, and you have a side effect typical of aspirin, it was probably due to the aspirin, and not voodoo stress.”

This is SCIENCE. This is BASIC. FREAKING. SCIENCE.

It is SO basic, it is not in the literature. It is assumed that you understand this to even be able to begin to READ the scientific literature.

It is time to call people to account for these most basic things.

I want you to understand the following.

On honesty alone, I am more qualified to be the CEO of Pfizer than is Albert Bourla.

If Bourla does not explain this most basic truth to the people of the world, then he is a scientific FRAUD.

If Anthony Fauci does not explain this most basic truth to the people of the world, then he, too, is a scientific FRAUD.

I told you the truth. Bourla did not. Fauci did not.

Think about that.

W

Ref: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/explosion-new-heart-conditions-dismissed-post-pandemic-stress-disorder

Ref: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/04/uk-physicians-worried-about-large-numbers-of-cardiac-health-emergencies/

Unless Anthony Fauci Confronts the COVID Vaccine Toxic Batch Problem, He is Worse than Josef Mengele

Lara Logan said nothing wrong. Fox News is simply too STUPID to understand why she is RIGHT.

Let’s listen.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vpzmab-lara-logan-on-dr.-fauci-he-doesnt-represent-science-he-represents-megele.html

In fact, Logan WENT EASY on America’s FRANKENSTEIN, Anthony Fauci.

Lara Logan said NOTHING – absolutely nothing – about the GREATEST SCANDAL IN MEDICAL HISTORY, which is happening RIGHT NOW under Fauci’s complete control and direction. Indeed, by all appearances, Anthony Fauci is helping to cover up one of the most murderous medical scandals in HISTORY.

And it may be even worse. It may be that Anthony Fauci is PART OF THAT SCANDAL.

Yet – ironically – Lara Logan let Anthony Fauci COMPLETELY off the hook.

Well, not me.

I’m not letting Anthony Fauci off.

I’m going to explain why Anthony Fauci is very likely a monster 1000 to 2000 times WORSE than Josef Mengele.

And I have the DATA TO PROVE IT.

Fox News – why don’t you ask some smart guy like Jesse Watters to explain it to you?

Or are YOU protecting America’s Mengele?

LISTEN and LEARN.


The Toxic Vaccine Batch Problem

The toxic vaccine batch problem is absolutely extraordinary. Science has never seen anything quite like this.

Bluntly, it was discovered in three stages, that something was VERY WRONG with CERTAIN BATCHES of the COVID vaccines distributed in America. Each stage of understanding showed, progressively, that the problem was WORSE than what we had thought before.


Stage 1 – There was a Small Group of Highly Toxic Batches

STAGE 1: The Daily Expose finds that almost all of the deaths and bad reactions to the COVID vaccines came from about 5% of the batches. If you got one of the “killer batches”, you were in serious trouble.

LINK: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/10/31/100-percent-of-covid-19-vaccine-deaths-caused-by-just-5-percent-of-the-batches-produced/

So what was the approach of NIH, CDC and FDA to this information?

CRICKETS. Say nothing and hope that it goes away.


Stage 2 – The Toxic Batches Are Not Random

STAGE 2: Karl Denninger runs the numbers himself. This is SCIENCE. Is the observation reproducible? YES, IT IS. Not only does Denninger confirm the toxic vaccine batch problem – he finds that the toxic batches were NOT RANDOM. Something was SYSTEMATICALLY WRONG with those very particular batches.

If you want a quick and understandable explanation of the toxic batch problem, just watch this video, or click on any of the three links below it.

LINK 1: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109

LINK 2: https://www.rebelnews.com/analyzing_data_of_adverse_reactions_to_covid_vaccines

LINK 3: https://rumble.com/vpi1pj-analyzing-data-of-adverse-reactions-to-covid-vaccines-karl-denninger.html


Stage 3 – There are Clear Patterns to the Toxic Batches

STAGE 3: A chronological analysis of the bad batches shows strong clustering which indicates some kind of INTENT. The clustering affects one company at a time, alternating between companies, between levels of toxicity, and between “toxic / non-toxic”. Everything about the clustering looks like what one would expect for human dosage experimentation on the recipients.

It is HIGHLY recommended that you listen to the following TWO video analyses.

LINK: https://hillmd.substack.com/p/vaccine-batches-vary-in-toxicity

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/keoCmPh3vuiG/


Summary:

Certain batches (roughly 5%) of the three COVID-19 vaccines used in America were very clearly HIGHLY TOXIC relative to normal batches.

Further analysis shows that the poisoning was NOT random – there was some kind of systematic reason behind certain batches being really, really dangerous.

Chronological clustering analysis shows TIMING and OWNERSHIP of the bad batches. It shows a relationship of coordination between companies. It shows both DOSE RANGING and BASELINING. In other words, it appears that the toxicity was intentional, and vaccine recipients were being EXPERIMENTED UPON.

Even further analysis shows that there is a LOT NUMBER RELATIONSHIP between bad batches in the bad batch clusters.


I think at this point it is VERY, VERY, VERY clear that Anthony Fauci MUST know something about this.

And yet, nobody in FAKE NEWS questions him about it.

Let’s be clear. We have EVIDENCE of human experimentation with certain batches of these horrible vaccines. But Fauci – the man who would be responsible for such experimentation – or for doing something ABOUT IT – can only COMPLAIN about comparisons to Mengele?

Well, WHY NOT?

Josef Mengele seemed to be very “OK” with involuntary human experimentation.

Anthony Fauci seems to be very “OK” with involuntary human experimentation.

So I’m going to make this VERY CLEAR.

Until Anthony Fauci has told us WHO IS RESPONSIBLE for the toxic vaccine batch problem, and has ELIMINATED THE PROBLEM, I will NEVER – EVER – take another vaccine.

I mean, why can’t the same people poison any OTHER vaccine – including the flu vaccine?

Answer – they CAN poison any vaccine they want to poison. And they will get away with it, as long as Anthony Fauci is protecting them.

Whoever poisoned those vaccines is still out there.

And every bit of evidence tells me that Anthony Fauci knows exactly who these Mengeles are, and is protecting them from scrutiny.


Well, it’s time for Anthony “Maybe Mengele” Fauci to answer our questions – or turn over his job to somebody who will.

Because otherwise, he is single-handedly DESTROYING our trust in medicine and science.


W

(H/T RF121 for tipping me off to the latest information on toxic batches.)

Is Team GOF-Grift at NIH and Pfizer Dog-Whistling to Dirty Merrick Garland for the Next Gestapo Action?

Or did Dodge-and-Fib arrange the drama, as with the National School Board rogue Democrats?


mood music:

If you’ve been following the machinations of the DOJ-FBI-KGB-SS during the major distraction of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, then you already know that DOJ-FBI sent their first school board jack-boots after a “super-mom” in Colorado, under the pretext of “domestic terrorism”.


FBI Jackboots Break Down Door and Raid Home of America’s Mom

November 20, 2021 | Sundance | 26 Comments


https://youtu.be/J8rt-ME4QYo?list=TLGG03ULS_GdB6QyMTExMjAyMQ

The reality is that this woman – who knows county clerk Tina Peters of Dominion whistle-blower fame – has been very effective in Colorado politics, particularly against the CRT-SEL scam which enriches A.G. Merrick “Kapo” Garland’s family business of undermining American society toward some race-nutty Democrat Bolshevik “utopia” based on permanent animosity between blacks and “selectively defined whites”.

Yeah, let me repeat that, for the sake of the clarity of their camouflage. We’re talking about the “I’m not white, I’m Jewish” scam. Whatever.

Let’s ignore the Obama Third Term’s sick mind-frack. Bolsheviks – of all former religions and perpetually aggrieved races – even against their own – no longer define reality for the majority of Americans. We are ON to their games. And the reality on the ground is this. “Kapo” Garland is moving on from merely imprisoning “January Sixers” to going after America’s highly effective and grass-roots-winning “Super-Moms”.

Isn’t that just HITLER? Go after the civilians. Go after the women and children. FRANCE remembers.

What a P.O.S. that man is. Almost as bad as his Fuehrer, Obama.

Not Biden – OBAMA.

Now, let me be more blunt.

If you think they’re never coming for YOU, you are sorely mistaken. Whatever it is, on their bucket list of neo-Soviet globalist fascist tyranny, they’re going after it. And YOU are in the way.

FIRST Kapo came for the Trump election protesters. The SICK TRICK of the BUFFALO JUMP.

THEN Kapo came for the super-moms.

So WHO is NEXT?

I think it’s US – the TRUE JOURNALISTS AND SCIENTISTS FIGHTING THE COVID GRIFT.

I think it’s people like Alex Berenson, FLCCC doctors, Karl Denninger, Peter McCullough, Steve Kirsch, and anybody else – ME INCLUDED – and Sundance, too – anybody who is now acting as a REAL JOURNALIST or a REAL SCIENTIST, when the CORPORATE FAKE MEDIA and PAID-OFF SCIENCE are all failing terribly to DO THEIR DUTIES.

Why do I think this?

THIRD TIME IS A CHARM.

Yes, there was some GROUNDWORK laid for this stuff, when KGB-FBI went after Simone Gold with the usual 20 guns media psy-op.


DOJ/FBI Watch – Using Investigative Creep To Begin East German-Style Political Intimidation Raids

This is a HEADS UP to all authentic American patriots about our phony globo-nazi “friends” in DOJ and FBI, otherwise known as “Dodge” and “FIB”. Let me give you the TL;DR right here. The Bidenistas and Bidenazis are going to try to GO CANADA during however long they remain in power. “FIB” is going to …


However, I have now seen THREE calls for us “dissident scientists and journalists” to be rounded up.

Let’s take a look at them.


1. Prof. Peter Hotez, Vaccine Expert

The first bizarre play in this little game was an establishment vaccine scientist, Dr. Peter Hotez, coming up with a whacky sound-bite by proposing that people who criticized Anthony Fauci needed to be arrested.

https://www.thecollegefix.com/professor-suggests-it-should-be-a-federal-hate-crime-to-criticize-fauci-and-other-government-funded-scientists/

WHUT?

This guy is normally pretty level-headed, and I used to quote him all the time on vaccine science.

But YES, he not only SAID it – he tweeted about it, and wrote a column.

Yeah, let’s just save that sucker before Twitter deletes it or the dude closes his account. Or when Fauci is finally brought to justice, Hotez will likely claim he never said this, and will delete the tweet.

Of course, this seemed pretty hilarious to everybody at the time. But I now think it was predictive programming served up for the progzis at Dodge and Fib.

Roughly six months before needed. Yup. They were getting out ahead of us.

We were actually rather lucky, in that Hotez fired off this crap before all the PROOF broke that – Yes, Virginia – all of Hotez’s earnestly defended buddies really did perform gain-of-function experiments in China, and they KNEW IT.

Hotez looked pretty dorky after that. Rand Paul had a field day.

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MORE!


2. Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO

The second case of somebody on Team Spike Protein calling for “arrests” – although perhaps a bit more discreetly – was Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla.

This guy is a bit of an actor, which I can tell you is a “quality” of some Big Pharma C-level stiffs – at least from my limited number of interactions with them. They will gladly and openly run scripted con games as a form of business dealings. I kid you not. I was shocked the first time I ran into it. And indeed, Bourla already engaged in a kind of patent medicine shill act with Israel, when he was “not allowed to come” because he wasn’t “fully vaccinated”.

Oy vey. THE CRINGE. Stage left!

Such a hammy operation. We used to fall for this stuff. But no more.

Bear in mind that Israel and Pfizer cut a HUGE deal, and were BEST OF CHUMS when it was done.

Whatever. As long as Israel minds it’s own business……..

Yeah. I know. “Allies.”

Anyway, Bourla has really been feeling the heat from all sides, so he decided the smart thing to do was to label us – the “purveyors of misinformation” – as “criminals”.

Not smart, it seemed at first.

LINK: https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/11/09/pfizer-ceo-bourla-people-who-spread-misinformation-on-covid-vaccines-are-criminals/

Notice that this was done in conjunction with that nasty globonazi “Atlantic Council”, who already partnered onto a thousand LIES. FIGURES.

Here is the video:

Again, this seemed like stupid bait for a lot of bad press.

But these people are not stupid. Trust me.

So we have a voice from ACADEMIA, and a voice from INDUSTRY, both BEGGING Kapo to do something.

Who do they need NEXT?

Ah, yes. GOVERNMENT.


3. NIH Director Francis Collins

This was the one where I invoked the “James Bond rule” and said – OK – this makes three of them – we’re looking at “enemy action”.

Don’t mistake the crafty Drax for NIH Director Francis Collins. Collins is one of the best FRONTS that Obama ever had. Collins was crafted by the Clinton and Obama administrations into “The old Christian scientist that the rubes will trust.” I was never quite sure WHY Francis Collins was not merely tolerated by Obama and company, but seemingly showcased. Well, by now, in the THIRD OBAMA TERM, it’s very clear.

In the same way that goofball James Clapper served as a kind of “useful idiot” in DNI, Collins served as a “useful befuddled genius” in NIH, to chill any suspicions of nasty goings-on in the now-communized sci-med-bio complex.

It is VERY instructive to read the Wikipedia entry for Francis Collins. The thing that will jog your memory is the word “ethics”. Yes. Remember when this guy was pure as the driven snow? We TRUSTED him.

This was the primary reason for the communists, globalists, and Third Way fascists having Collins as a facade for the various scammy goings-on that have plagued American science, mostly during and after the Obama administration, where it all got “set up” for the big 2020 scamapalooza.

I could spend a lot of time going back and showcasing all the good things Francis Collins did over his long career, and they are considerable, but quite frankly, the Fake News Media has done an excellent job of that. I defer to them.

It’s the other stuff – all the stuff that the corporate fake news STUDIOUSLY IGNORED, that I – most unfortunately – need to detail for you.

Francis Collins apparently “misspoke” in denying that people under him were funding viral gain-of-function (GOF) research in China. Whether or not that is connected to his resignation, the fact remains – Collins announced his resignation / retirement in early October – shortly after his “misstatements” were made public.

LINK: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/10/04/report-francis-collins-nih-director-resign-coronavirus-pandemic/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/K1d6c

This one is worth a read.

A bit of a sad end to Collins’ illustrious career. I like to think that, somewhere behind the scenes, on the way to submitting his resignation, Collins told his “handlers” and “superiors” to go jump in a lake – that he was no longer going to cover for them.

PFFFFFFT!

Dream on, idiot Wolf. The noble science you signed up for never existed.

Yeah, I’m a CHUMP SUPREME on that one, because on his way out the door, what does Collins do?

He chooses GATES NUMBER THREE!

LINK: https://summit.news/2021/11/20/nih-director-calls-for-covid-conspiracists-to-be-brought-to-justice/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/IfqZO


Yeah, what do you EXPECT from a DOUBLE-MASKIE?

Let’s just reply to THAT with WOLF’S DICTUM:

“Authority misinformation is a far greater danger than popular misinformation.”

Think about it, Francis. It’s SCIENCE.

Add to this the principle that SCRUTINY BEGINS AT HOME, and I would say it’s time for NIH to clean it’s own house FIRST, so we don’t have to do it.

CASE IN POINT?

When NIH and Gilead Pharmaceuticals CLEARLY conspired to hide the kidney toxicity of remdesivir by blaming it on a commonly used excipient.


NIH and Gilead Blamecasting Remdesivir Renal Toxicity to an Excipient

Well, they can lock us out of The Q Tree, but they can’t stop the truth from getting out. Enjoy a post first over on The U Tree and now HERE. Here is a quickie in my WAR ON REMDESIVIR. Fellow Treeper barkerjim dropped an interesting document today, from back in July, which showed the …


There are plenty of links in that reference, and in those references, too, for anybody who WANTS to see if remdesivir might be toxic, to LOOK FOR THEMSELVES.

Better to look for yourself, Francis, than to trust a guy like Fauci.

This is where having a nice old doufus like Francis Collins pays off for Team Obama. The man is a sitting duck for the “Nazis of Nice”, as I like to call them. Collins was oblivious to his own mistake of trusting sneaky, crafty, sketchy guys like Anthony Fauci.

Collins is not alone there. Franklin Graham is another great example.

Pushed the vaccine, and got pericarditis from it – never said a word of consideration that this was straight out of the vaccine risks he has pushed aside. I suspect that the thought never occurred to him that maybe he was wrong – but if it did, he must have decided to go along with the CDC “white lie” of “vaccine hesitancy must by stopped at all costs” – CLEARLY A DEVIL’S DEAL, when MANDATES and CDC LIES rule the day – to say nothing of the lay-person-obvious “no contraindications to the vaccine” fallacy.

Come on, Frankie. WAKE UP. You’re in STALINVILLE now. THEY JUST LIE.

Anthony Fauci and Rochelle Walensky have made fools of us all, by taking vaccine hesitancy – a METRIC of vaccine success or failure – and turning it into an ANATHEMA to be fought by all means possible – even the grandest of dishonesties.

Yes – PINTO hesitancy was bad. We really should have fought that, too.

Yes – AIDS hesitancy was bad. And I guess we did fight that, using gay pride in schools.

See how it works?

A GRIFT fit for a KING.

And the MARKS and SUCKERS who line up for it, are born every minute.

LINK: https://www.christianpost.com/news/franklin-graham-undergoes-surgery-at-mayo-clinic-for-heart-issue.html

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/Fsffn


So here we are. Francis Collins’ final act is to call out for Herod’s men to go off looking for those conspiracy babies.

Good job, Francis. You’re not as impressive of a fool as the other Francis, but you tried.

In any case, we’ll handle the ethics now. This is not the world you thought it was.

You need the special glasses, and the will to put them on.

W

Pfizer Buys Scientific American

NO – I do NOT mean that Pfizer went out and bought a copy of the magazine Scientific American, or Sci-Am, as we used to call it when I was a young, foolish, chump of a science student – long before I “learned to code”.

And NO – I do NOT mean that Pfizer bought the publication, Scientific American, lock stock and barrel.

What I do mean is that Pfizer BOUGHT OFF Scientific American.

I mean that Pfizer – now an arm of CHINA – obtained a controlling leverage over the publication Scientific American. Somehow, Pfizer BOUGHT THEM OFF.

So what evidence do I have?

GATHER ROUND, KIDDIES.


I may be old as the hills, but I’m not as old as Scientific American.

The above is what “vintage” Sci-Am of my era looked like.

Long before THAT, it looked like this:

As you can see, Sci-Am has been around for a while.

Sci-Am is somewhere on the border between actual scientific literature – particularly reviews and letters – and secondary literature like the “industry rags” that Pfizer whistleblower Karen Kingston was talking about. The rags – a somewhat disrespectful name, in my opinion – include Chemical & Engineering News, that magazine which I am so fond of using as a source for quality “face value” vaccine journalism.

C&EN, as they call it, is a product of the American Chemical Society.

Sci-Am, on the other hand, is a product of a scientific publisher called Springer. Here is what is written at the bottom of the Scientific American website:


Scientific American is part of Springer Nature, which owns or has commercial relations with thousands of scientific publications (many of them can be found at www.springernature.com/us). Scientific American maintains a strict policy of editorial independence in reporting developments in science to our readers.

© 2021 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, A DIVISION OF SPRINGER NATURE AMERICA, INC.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.


Now, just because these publications do quality and unbiased work, when motivated and allowed to do so, does NOT mean they can’t be taken over and controlled by entities such as – LET’S SAY – China.

Springer and ACS may SAY that they’re not controlled by their CCP and/or Big Pharma “partners”, but anybody who has watched America’s own Hollywood turn anti-American and absolutely paralyzed about saying or doing anything that might “offend” China, understands who is REALLY the boss now.

Pfizer. And China.

Indeed, we did a post about this rather recently, which resulted in quite a few outages of this site.

Why Was Pfizer-Wuhan Demanding Military Bases as Collateral for Vaccines?

But let’s get back to now.

I was just visiting a certain store of my acquaintance which sells – somewhat surprisingly – magazines, including Scientific American.

Years ago, I frequently bought Sci-Am and other magazines at that store. Sadly, as the “science” in Sci-Am became more and more “woke”, it became less and less of interest to me.

What I would find in the THINNER and THINNER issues of Sci-Am, was more and more authoritarian virtue signaling to major media-endorsed “dubious science”, and less and less robust scientific and journalistic skepticism (to say nothing of ETHICAL skepticism, rare as hen’s teeth).

As I stood in said store, looking at the latest issue’s cover (well, the latest that said local store might have), I laughed at the BULLSHIT COVER IMAGE – a literal propaganda “shop job” – which would have never even been allowed into the cheap and cheesy “back pages” of the Sci-Am of my youth.

Good GRIEF. It’s like a cross between Madison Avenue and the Nazi school science textbook that my dear mother saved all these years. Fascist propaganda, marketed as education. Not everybody could see that in Germany at the time, and not everybody can see it now. But that is precisely what this cover is. Fascist propaganda. Virtue signaling to the regime.

The “vapor storms” propaganda is obvious, and part of the fascist climate scam, so there was no reason for me to buy this issue. I dare not give a dime to Green-Hearted Greta’s Groovy Grift. If I wanted to spend my time debunking the latest scare-scam in climate grift, I would, but that’s somebody else’s job. I can barely keep up with the COVID grift as it is.

But then I saw that little blurb up in the upper right-hand corner.

“Gene Therapy Finally Works”

Really! Well, that might be interesting.

[ You will notice that I was already “chumping out” right there – ASSUMING this would be educational. ]

So I go looking for the Table of Contents page – which turned out to be two pages – the first being the “hot stuff” and the second being “everything else”. Eventually I found what I was looking for on the first page. The “gene therapy” stuff took up the last third of the listings, but comprised over 2/3 of the listed page numbers.


SPECIAL REPORT

S1 Innovations in Gene Therapy

S2 Gene Therapy Comes of Age

S3 The Gene Fix
by Esther Landhuis

S6 Graphic: Editing the Book of Life

S8 Overcoming Gene Therapy’s Long Shadow
by Tanya Lewis

S12 Success Stories
by Jim Daley

S15 High Hopes
by Marla Broadfoot


It looked like the “special report” was near the end. I found the section and thumbed though it. It looked not only readily understandable, but reasonably scientific – a lot like what I expect from C&EN.

GREAT, I thought – I can learn some more gene therapy science that I can use to understand the COVID GRIFT, since one of the mRNA vaccine platform’s primary motivations was clearly to “grease the skids” for gene therapy.

It wasn’t until I got home, that I fully realized what I had just bought.

The “special report” – 20 pages long – with only 66 magazine pages before it and 7 after it (73 total) – many of them full-page ads – was actually a kind of “infomercial advertorial“.

It was LITERALLY paid, sponsored, scientific reporting by (allegedly) free-lance scientists.

The last page explained it all. Big, blue, and in the middle, this:


This section
was produced
independently
with support from

Pfizer



SPECIAL REPORT FROM

SCIENTIFIC
AMERICAN

nature



ScientificAmerican.com/InnovationsIn/gene-therapy


Don’t bother with that URL – it doesn’t work.

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR

After ALL of the 73 pages of non-Pfizer (I checked) content AND the 20 page Pfizer advertorial, was ANOTHER 5-page Pfizer spread, boosting PFIZER’S own efforts in gene therapy. Followed, at long last, by one more ad and one numbered page – 74.

So – we have basically 75 pages of non-Pfizer and 25 pages of Pfizer, for a grand total of 25% Pfizer.

Scientific American – now with 25% Pfizer content.

So – is this a new phenomenon?

As it turns out, NO.

Pfizer apparently started on this push BEFORE COVID. Conveniently before COVID.

I have no idea how many Sci-Am advertorials they do, but I know of at least one more.

THIS ONE was in January of 2019, and it’s available online.

LINK: https://www.scientificamerican.com/custom-media/nature-outlook-gene-therapy/realizing-the-promise-of-gene-therapy-through-collaboration-and-partnering-pfizers-view/

So – the good part of one year before the COVID release from Wuhan, where Pfizer has its nice new Chinese operation, we get a gene therapy promotional in Scientific American.

Let’s do that one in text for Zoe, and to focus on something very “Event 201”, which I have emphasized in bold.


Realizing the Promise of Gene Therapy Through Collaboration and Partnering: Pfizer’s View

Gene therapy for single-gene disorders is at a pivotal period in its evolution, with continued successful development requiring tight collaboration among industry, academic, regulatory, clinical and patient communities.

Produced with support from Pfizer.

By Anna P. Tretiakova, on January 14, 2019


Sounds about like what happened, thanks to the phony crisis, backed by Chinese PLA 4GW and our treasonous “collaborators”.

Kinda sad how media lies helped assure “patient collaboration” – right up to the death vents, murderous remdesivir, and $30K a pop for dead Deplorables – from their own tax money.

Hitler would have been proud to have pulled the COVID grift – getting the money for the gold teeth before he even got the teeth.

Now, it turns out that finding this older advertorial online, allowed me to find a URL for the new one, too.

You will notice that the non-functioning URL for this November 2021 advertorial:

ScientificAmerican.com/InnovationsIn/gene-therapy

…..is DIFFERENT from the one for the January 2019 advertorial. The printed URL does NOT work. However, this one, crafted in analogy to the older one, does:

LINK: https://www.scientificamerican.com/custom-media/innovations-in-gene-therapy/

SO – if you want to read the same gene therapy articles that I will be reading, they’re online and available for your perusal.

I could go on and add many more scandalous things about today’s Pfizer that I have in various bookmarks and tabs on my computer, but enough is enough for this post.

Ever since Trump criticized Pfizer for getting CDC to suspend the Johnson+Johnson vaccine, and ever since #PfizerLeak hit the internet…..


#PfizerLEAK

Stew Peters is doing great work. Sure he’s had some people on, in the past, who I was not terribly impressed with. Later, he had Jane Ruby on, with magnetic stuff that I believe is mostly disinformation. Sorry – not buying. The Magnetism Challenge: Part II – Scientific Disinformation During the COVID-19 Narrative Collapse Wherein …


…..it has become very clear that Pfizer has been a key player in all that has befallen us.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla can call us “criminals”, but quite frankly it’s not gonna stick any more than Hitler calling innocent Jews “criminals” stuck. We are, in fact, a rather puny and broken force, a lot like those who fought fascism the last time. We are a sad collection of allies, not even sure what unites us.

But we do have one thing in common.

WE ARE NOT CRIMINALS.

Maybe Pfizer should tell their pet American president – their criminal president – to end the fucking mandates. Because if it doesn’t happen, people like me are going to die, but there will also be justice, and not all of the people brought to justice will live.

W

Nuremberg II

Featured Photo: Meeting of the War Crimes Executive Committee, which decided on the arrangements for the Nuremberg trials. Note the garage pull in the background – Exhibit F1b. I am dying of the China Virus. I had the virus itself in the latter half of January, 2020. I became symptomatic on January 18, and thus …