“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
I just wanted to document two things for the record, while I had the evidence in hand, before the “usual suspects” (Twitter, Google, etc.) cover it all up.
First – the “scientific misconduct” attack.
Second – the “big tech malign error” attack.
Assault With a Bik’s Pen
This is an interesting story about my encounter with some kind of “Act Blue” but “Fake Red” pharma-defending propagandist who alerted me to something I had not been aware of – that the scientific establishment has tried to attack HCQ researcher Didier Raoult by abusing a kind of scientific fraud-hunter named Elisabeth Bik.
Follow this conversation and you will learn the details.
It started with somebody publishing details about the attack on a dissident “Ivermectin doc” who I follow on Twitter.
Dr. Bowden is a Board Certified Stanford educated doctor from Houston, TX who’s treated & saved more than 5,500 patient lives, including my mom when she had Covid.
This tweet cites a study by the University of Kansas Medical Center, claiming that ivermectin has no effect. THAT is a whole ‘nuther topic, which is very interesting, and which implicated KUMC (not to be confused with UMKC) as engaging in woke politicized science, but set that aside for now.
Here was one nice response to the attack.
oh wow, it's almost as if they did everything wrong in this study. what are the odds?
"symptoms of acute infection for 7 days or less"
fucking lol. honestly, this study says more about you, than ivermectin.
There ARE indeed some big criticisms of that study – I believe that Pierre Kory had some of them – but set that issue aside. Watch a PHARMA RAT rush in, as soon as I say something which besmirches their money-maker remdesivir.
My comment:
What really shocks me is how bent out of shape the "mass formation med echoes" get over a drug with almost no side effects and admittedly limited antiviral activity (ivermectin), while utterly silent about remdesivir, proven to cause organ failure, too toxic for Ebola use. WTH
I mean, what the hell! The problems of remdesivir are very well documented, and I read about the organ failure MYSELF – not only the original failures in the Ebola trials, but massive kidney failure problems during COVID treatment. I read the (per Fauci) key paper myself, including the data section, and was shocked at how blithely Fauci had written off multiple kidney failures in the TREATED group, well above any occurring in the placebo group. NASTY!!!
This PhillyPharmaBoy either doesn’t know what he’s talking about, or he’s lying. But I remained nice.
Here was my response.
I will definitely agree about ineffectiveness (see pix). However, IIRC, the original remdesivir study that Fauci cited with Trump as "gold standard" showed much worse results than Raoult showed in his full HCQ/AZM study, & the kidney failure rate under remdesivir was shocking. pic.twitter.com/22PZyI5ScN
I am missing something. Are you comparing Ebola to COVID? That comparison cannot be made. Oh, and Raoult is under criminal investigation for massive long-term fraud, including his hydroxychloroquine studies.
What the FUCK! “That comparison cannot be made”? A drug with a kidney failure problem in one disease can’t be compared to the same drug having a kidney failure problem with a similar disease of the same basic type? LOL!
But WHAT THE HELL!
“Oh, and Raoult is under criminal investigation for massive long-term fraud, including his hydroxychloroquine studies.”
That was the first I had heard about any “investigation” of Raoult.
My “foxhole buddy” on Twitter responded immediately.
I then did some quick research, and realized that these science progs were pulling a “Peekaboo James” attack investigation on Raoult! NASTY!!! Communist, fascist, progressive SWINE!
Exactly. Looks like woke-sci girl Bik (who does have a record of *selectively* pursuing science fraud) went after Raoult as a Covidian virtue signal, and he fought back. Good. I've read several of Raoult's papers, and he's a good researcher, IMO.https://t.co/nufjg7Ay2T
My buddy of the moment called her a straight-up fraud, but IMO this Bik lady is a victim, too – basically an autistic, woke “error-hunter”, much like the “plagiarism-hunters” who look for places where people have gotten lazy on citations, and are vulnerable like ALL academics are, with enough spotlight and draconian-enough standards.
Bik was used to go after Raoult, and she will pay the price of the Trump Curse.
From what little I have read now, she's good at casing shade and doubt, but may have gotten too far out over her skis in going after Raoult. An innocent man who knows it, is a very bad person for a serial accuser, trained on only guilty parties, to tangle with. Unforced error.
all these 'debunkers' eventually reveal themselves. Susan Oliver, the ultimate grifting 'debunker' jumped the shark when she claimed mRNA in mother's milk wasn't a big deal. a few of her more recent 'productions' have been pretty colourful to say the least…
I checked this out. It was a horrible pile-on of woke bullshitters, exactly like what all those lying NAT-SEC fascists did to Trump, for which 50-60 LIARS need to not only lose their security clearances, but in my opinion, go to prison as well, for abusing their credentials.
I do hope that also happens to these attackers of Raoult, with their precious “Expressions of Concern”!
Expressions of concern! Sacré bleu!
Another sad expression of the new Lysenkoism, IMO.
That was it. PhillyPharmaBoy was done with us. NO SALE.
SO – this was where I first learned about the “Bik” attack on Raoult.
My question now – what is the status of the situation?
I can find NOTHING in the English-speaking world about this. No further information, other than moans of sympathy for Bik, that mean old Raoult SUED her for attacking him.
It LOOKS like there is no news that serves the narrative, so nobody is talking about the confrontation. It LOOKS like Didier Raoult must be winning.
I needed to get into the French side of the web, if I was going to find anything.
And THAT is when I went looking for any word on the situation in Raoult’s Twitter account.
The guy writes almost entirely in French, and nobody comments on his timeline in anything but French, but we have Google Translate – R-I-I-I-I-I-G-H-T???
Google Mistranslate
This was cute, and is very typical of the kinds of “knives in the back” which can be done with “bad I.T.” while being passed off as an error, accident, or other plausibly deniable non-human problem. And, of course, if A.I. is responsible for this lie, then the situation is even worse, but I’m not ready to help them pass the blame to Rogue Woke A.I.
In looking for any – ANY – news about Didier Raoult’s lawsuit against Elisabeth Bik, I went to Raoult’s Twitter account, and began scanning down below his top, pinned Tweet, which was a kind homage to the director of his institute, who appears to be resigning. Hopefully she is not being forced into resignation, but who knows – things are bad right now, in Globonazi France, and I can imagine that there is yet another attempt to “take care of” Raoult before the next phony pandemic can take place.
Take out a friendly or honest director, and put an opponent or rat fink in place. Oldest trick in the book.
Anyway, I noticed this tweet:
Notre étude sur la baisse de la charge virale par le traitement par hydroxychloroquine dans le covid est en ligne et confirme notre première étude.Nous avons fait valider les données de la première par huissier montrant que l'émission''Complément d' enquête'' utilisait des faux.
Notre étude sur la baisse de la charge virale par le traitement par hydroxychloroquine dans le covid est en ligne et confirme notre première étude.Nous avons fait valider les données de la première par huissier montrant que l’émission”Complément d’ enquête” utilisait des faux.
Translated from French by [Google]
Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. used fakes.
There is no chance that this perfectly reversing bad translation is an accident. This is deliberate sabotage under the color of a program error.
The mistranslation is easily removed/prevented by adding the missing space in “étude.Nous”, which results in (using Google Translate):
Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. We had the data from the premiere validated by a bailiff showing that the ”Complément d’Enquête” program was using fakes.
Sneaky.
For completeness and durability of my evidence, screen captures:
Missing Space:
Added Space:
I alerted Raoult to this very nasty jab by the Nasty Jabbists:
S'il vous plaît, remarquez comment à cause d'un espace manquant, Google traduit "par erreur" ce tweet en un terrible aveu de fraude!
"Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. used fakes."
Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. We had the data from the premiere validated by a bailiff showing that the ''Complément d'Enquête'' program was using fakes.
For the visually impaired or deprived, my tweets, including the Google translations:
S’il vous plaît, remarquez comment à cause d’un espace manquant, Google traduit “par erreur” ce tweet en un terrible aveu de fraude! [Please notice how due to a missing space, Google “erroneously” translates this tweet into a terrible admission of fraud!]
“Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. used fakes.”
Ajout d’un espace (étude. Nous): [Addition of a space …]
Our study on the drop in viral load by treatment with hydroxychloroquine in covid is online and confirms our first study. We had the data from the premiere validated by a bailiff showing that the ”Complément d’Enquête” program was using fakes.
It’s also worth looking at the other tweets in the thread, and their translations.
The second tweet simply says “Reference” and provides a link to this article.
The role of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in lowering the viral load of patients with COVID-19 is controversial. In our Institute, we treated more than 30,000 people with COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021, using the same diagnostic tools and the same treatment dosages. In this retrospective comparative study of data collected over this period, we aimed to compare the viral clearance in the nasopharynx as determined by qPCR in patients who were treated with HCQ and those who were not. As a new feature, we adjusted the data according to the most significant confounding factors (age, initial viral load, and timescale between the onset of symptoms and treatment). Of the 1 276 patients selected from our database, 776 were treated with HCQ and 500 were not. Viral clearance in the treatment group was reached significantly earlier than in the non-treatment group, at days 5, 10 and 30. These differences remain significant after adjustments for confounding factors. In conclusion, although age, initial viral load, and time to treatment do influence the viral load in patients with COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin still independently significantly lowered viral load more rapidly than other treatments, including azithromycin alone.
Peer review status: UNDER REVIEW
22 Mar 2023 Submitted to Journal of Medical Virology
Cite as: Philippe Brouqui, Jean-Christophe Lagier, P. Parola, et al. Viral clearance in patients with COVID-19: associated factors and the role of antiviral treatment. Authorea. March 22, 2023. DOI: 10.22541/au.167948825.59270994/v1
The translation of the third tweet is the best.
Again, as text:
” Ce qui me bouleverse ce n’ est pas que tu m’ aies menti, c’ est que je ne pourrai plus te croire” Nietzsche
Translated from French by [Google]
“What upsets me is not that you lied to me, it’s that I won’t be able to believe you anymore” Nietzsche
SO – the bottom line is simple.
The other side is NOT giving up.
They lie, they cheat, and they attack good men by scurrilous means.
They sacrifice their own in the process.
The Trump Curse is real, and the WOKE are BROKEN when they attack the good and the true.
And when we stand up for what is right, we WIN in the end.
How Two Fallen Theories of Medicine May Herald the Fate of Global Warming / Climate Change
Bad science does not stand forever, but it may stand long enough for people to make a lot of money on it. THAT will be the THEME of the three huge science scandals I’m going to discuss.
In case you’re short on time, the TLDR…..
TL;DR – Two fresh scandals showing how industry money and scientific misconduct kept bad theories “alive” for decades, may explain why the bad science behind politically useful climate alarmism persists.
I. Serotonin Uber Alles
The “serotonin scandal” is very diffuse, which is why it’s in many ways analogous to “climate change”. The bottom line is that what the pharmaceutical industry tells patients about antidepressants, and what scientists know about antidepressants, are not the same thing.
It’s best to start off with the following Tucker Carlson video.
An extremely important selling point of antidepressants, used by both doctors and the pharmaceutical industry, is the idea that people who are depressed, and therefore “need” to take them, actually have some kind of chemical imbalance in their brain that needs to be fixed. More often than any other chemical alleged to be “imbalanced” is serotonin – and hence the emergence of SSRIs, meaning serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors.
Carlson’s centerpiece is a recent metaanalysis of antidepressant research which showed there is little or no evidence for this “chemical imbalance” assertion.
Antidepressants may work in some people, and thank God they do, but IF they do, and WHEN they do, the simple “chemical imbalance theory” is probably not the reason why.
There is a very good explanation of the study HERE:
No evidence that depression is caused by low serotonin levels, finds comprehensive review
After decades of study, there remains no clear evidence that serotonin levels or serotonin activity are responsible for depression, according to a major review of prior research led by UCL scientists.
The new umbrella review – an overview of existing meta-analyses and systematic reviews – published in Molecular Psychiatry, suggests that depression is not likely caused by a chemical imbalance,and calls into question what antidepressants do. Most antidepressants are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), which were originally said to work by correcting abnormally low serotonin levels. There is no other accepted pharmacological mechanism by which antidepressants affect the symptoms of depression.
Lead author Professor Joanna Moncrieff, a Professor of Psychiatry at UCL and a consultant psychiatrist at North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT), said: “It is always difficult to prove a negative, but I think we can safely say that after a vast amount of research conducted over several decades, there is no convincing evidence that depression is caused by serotonin abnormalities, particularly by lower levels or reduced activity of serotonin.
“The popularity of the ‘chemical imbalance’ theory of depression has coincided with a huge increase in the use of antidepressants. Prescriptions for antidepressants have risen dramatically since the 1990s, with one in six adults in England and 2% of teenagers now being prescribed an antidepressant in a given year.
“Many people take antidepressants because they have been led to believe their depression has a biochemical cause, but this new research suggests this belief is not grounded in evidence.”
Just for the record, I am personally NOT a fan of these sorts of “metaanalysis” papers. In my opinion they tend to be QUASI-OPINIONS with a veneer of science. However, in my own opinion, metaanalyses can be useful when highly conclusive or by reinterpreting data – but should be trusted even less than normal observational science.
Now – it is important to point out that this metaanalysis is not actually telling us anything NEW. Most scientists in the field ALREADY KNEW from all the various studies that were looked at by the metaanalysis, that the simple “chemical imbalance” idea was a load of crap. They’ve known this for YEARS.
REALLY? Yes. Really.
A good description of the state of things is here:
A Popular Theory About Depression Wasn’t “Debunked” by a New Review
The title is a bit deceptive – at least more so than the link which adds “it got debunked years ago”. Ah, the techniques of clickbait!
Anyway, the title could rightfully say:
A Still-Popular But Unproven Old Theory About Depression Wasn’t “Debunked” By A New Review – It Was Simply Confirmed To STILL Be Unsupported By The Data, Despite Being Pushed For Decades By Doctors And Big Pharma Who KNEW It Wasn’t True
Please click the link if you want all the details, but my proposed title says it all. People kept using the theory as a sales and prescription gimmick. Big Pharma “suggested” the theory to doctors, and doctors “suggested” the theory to patients, to get them to take a kind of drug that patients are sometimes very resistant to taking.
Remember – antidepressants do, in fact, work for many patients – particularly for very serious cases of depression. Many people who in the past had to be hospitalized, can now live happy, functional lives in society because of these drugs.
It’s understandable that doctors try to convince patients to take the drugs they think will work to treat their problems.
But should your kids be getting antidepressants because of “school trouble”?
A whole ‘nuther question.
Because THAT is the end result of the little white lie that “people can have an imbalance that needs these drugs.”
We NORMALIZED antidepressents by NORMALIZING an ABNORMALITY that didn’t even exist.
ANYWAY – if the very fact that a WRONG THEORY has been KNOWINGLY spoon-fed to you by “the experts” for DECADES, is not giving you ideas about “climate change” – particularly in the post-COVID world…..
BUT WAIT.
Not quite yet. We have ANOTHER scandal to look at, first.
II. It’s Bush’s Beta Amyloid’s Fault!
This scandal is at the opposite end of the spectrum, from the above one, in which an entire industry and all of medicine KNOWINGLY told a little white lie to the public.
In this case, ONE SCIENTIST tipped the scales inappropriately, sending the entire world, including the rest of science, on a wild goose chase.
The LIE was only caught after years, and almost accidentally.
This is a rather long and interesting story, and I’m not going to recount it all here. But I will give you links and extensive quotes. It’s FASCINATING.
One of the best quick summaries is in, of all places, The Daily Kos.
Last month, drug company Genentech reported on the first clinical trials of the drug crenezumab, a drug targeting amyloid proteins that form sticky plaques in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease patients. The drug had been particularly effective in animal models, and the trial results were eagerly awaited as one of the most promising treatments in years. It did not work. “Crenezumab did not slow or prevent cognitive decline” in people with a predisposition toward Alzheimer’s.
Last year, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) narrowly approved the use of Aduhelm, a new drug from Biogen that the company has priced so highly that it’s expected to drive up the price of Medicare for everyone in America, even those who never need this drug. Aduhelm was the first drug to be approved that fights the accumulation of those “amyloid plaques” in the brain. What makes the approval of the $56,000-a-dose drug so controversial is that while it does decrease plaques, it doesn’t actually slow Alzheimer’s. In fact, clinical trials were suspended in 2019 after the treatment showed “no clinical benefits.” (Which did not keep Biogen from seeking the drug’s approval or pricing it astronomically.)
Over the last two decades, Alzheimer’s drugs have been notable mostly for having a 99% failure rate in human trials. It’s not unusual for drugs that are effective in vitro and in animal models to turn out to be less than successful when used in humans, but Alzheimer’s has a record that makes the batting average in other areas look like Hall of Fame material.
And now we have a good idea of why. Because it looks like the original paper that established the amyloid plaque model as the foundation of Alzheimer’s research over the last 16 years might not just be wrong, but a deliberate fraud.
This story is fantastic, and so I recommend starting with the above Daily Kos article.
Before going into more detail, let me begin to give you my perspective on Alzheimer’s drugs.
I’ve watched a lot of drug classes accumulate new and improved drugs over nearly half a century of interest in the topic, but the TWO categories that have stood out to ME as the WORST in terms of success have been antivirals and Alzheimer’s drugs.
Antivirals first.
As you have seen over the last two and a half years, antivirals are not impossible to find, and while they don’t work 100% of the time, they’re still sometimes VERY helpful.
What has been more shocking to me is that it’s clear that the pharmaceutical industry frequently and reliably OPPOSES successful antivirals, when they can’t make money off them. The industry wants NEW antivirals they can patent, and they are willing to DEFAME and DENY old antivirals, even SUPERIOR and SAFER antivirals, just to create a market for new ones.
New antivirals that may be CRAP, and dangerous as hell. And they will even LIE to the Commander In Chief about them.
But set the antivirals aside for now, knowing that the situation is corrupt.
Anti-Alzheimer’s drugs are even worse, because THEY JUST DON’T WORK. They’re notorious for not actually working. They’ve never worked. In desperation, the FDA occasionally approves these worthless drugs, if only for investigation, but they are “mercy punts”. The drugs get approved, as long as they don’t show too many side effects, because they are “better than nothing”. But that’s it.
The drugs out there for dementia, senility and Alzheimer’s are WORTHLESS.
A LOT of people thought this was suspicious. I was one of them. Every once in a while, when researchers would reveal just how BAD the next drug actually was – how terrible and limited the results were – I would “go back to my mental drawing board” and ask the question:
“Why don’t these drugs work? Maybe the theory behind them is wrong. What could the truth possibly be?”
HA! I had no idea! No clue!
NOBODY – and I mean nobody – suspected that it was because of FRAUD.
At least, not until recently.
So let’s move on to the fraud in more detail. SCIENCE MAGAZINE.
I am including a long segment which is just the beginning of the article. Please note an important point – the investigator was actually looking at a DIFFERENT fraud in the same field of Alzheimer’s research, when he found this one.
BLOTS ON A FIELD?
A neuroscience image sleuth finds signs of fabrication in scores of Alzheimer’s articles, threatening a reigning theory of the disease
In August 2021, Matthew Schrag, a neuroscientist and physician at Vanderbilt University, got a call that would plunge him into a maelstrom of possible scientific misconduct. A colleague wanted to connect him with an attorney investigating an experimental drug for Alzheimer’s disease called Simufilam. The drug’s developer, Cassava Sciences, claimed it improved cognition, partly by repairing a protein that can block sticky brain deposits of the protein amyloid beta (Aβ), a hallmark of Alzheimer’s. The attorney’s clients—two prominent neuroscientists who are also short sellers who profit if the company’s stock falls—believed some research related to Simufilam may have been “fraudulent,” according to a petition later filed on their behalf with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Schrag, 37, a softspoken, nonchalantly rumpled junior professor, had already gained some notoriety by publicly criticizing the controversial FDA approval of the anti-Aβ drug Aduhelm. His own research also contradicted some of Cassava’s claims. He feared volunteers in ongoing Simufilam trials faced risks of side effects with no chance of benefit.
So he applied his technical and medical knowledge to interrogate published images about the drug and its underlying science—for which the attorney paid him $18,000. He identified apparently altered or duplicated images in dozens of journal articles. The attorney reported many of the discoveries in the FDA petition, and Schrag sent all of them to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which had invested tens of millions of dollars in the work. (Cassava denies any misconduct [see sidebar, below].)
But Schrag’s sleuthing drew him into a different episode of possible misconduct, leading to findings that threaten one of the most cited Alzheimer’s studies of this century and numerous related experiments.
The first author of that influential study, published in Nature in 2006, was an ascending neuroscientist: Sylvain Lesné of the University of Minnesota (UMN), Twin Cities. His work underpins a key element of the dominant yet controversial amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s, which holds that Aβ clumps, known as plaques, in brain tissue are a primary cause of the devastating illness, which afflicts tens of millions globally. In what looked like a smoking gun for the theory and a lead to possible therapies, Lesné and his colleagues discovered an Aβ subtype and seemed to prove it caused dementia in rats. If Schrag’s doubts are correct, Lesné’s findings were an elaborate mirage.
Schrag, who had not publicly revealed his role as a whistleblower until this article, avoids the word “fraud” in his critiques of Lesné’s work and the Cassava-related studies and does not claim to have proved misconduct. That would require access to original, complete, unpublished images and in some cases raw numerical data. “I focus on what we can see in the published images, and describe them as red flags, not final conclusions,” he says. “The data should speak for itself.”
A 6-month investigation by Science provided strong support for Schrag’s suspicions and raised questions about Lesné’s research. A leading independent image analyst and several top Alzheimer’s researchers—including George Perry of the University of Texas, San Antonio, and John Forsayeth of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)—reviewed most of Schrag’s findings at Science’s request. They concurred with his overall conclusions, which cast doubt on hundreds of images, including more than 70 in Lesné’s papers. Some look like “shockingly blatant” examples of image tampering, says Donna Wilcock, an Alzheimer’s expert at the University of Kentucky.
The authors “appeared to have composed figures by piecing together parts of photos from different experiments,” says Elisabeth Bik, a molecular biologist and well-known forensic image consultant. “The obtained experimental results might not have been the desired results, and that data might have been changed to … better fit a hypothesis.”
Early this year, Schrag raised his doubts with NIH and journals including Nature; two, including Nature last week, have published expressions of concern about papers by Lesné. Schrag’s work, done independently of Vanderbilt and its medical center, implies millions of federal dollars may have been misspent on the research—and much more on related efforts. Some Alzheimer’s experts now suspect Lesné’s studies have misdirected Alzheimer’s research for 16 years.
“The immediate, obvious damage is wasted NIH funding and wasted thinking in the field because people are using these results as a starting point for their own experiments,” says Stanford University neuroscientist Thomas Südhof, a Nobel laureate and expert on Alzheimer’s and related conditions.
Lesné did not respond to requests for comment. A UMN spokesperson says the university is reviewing complaints about his work.
To Schrag, the two disputed threads of Aβ research raise far-reaching questions about scientific integrity in the struggle to understand and cure Alzheimer’s. Some adherents of the amyloid hypothesis are too uncritical of work that seems to support it, he says. “Even if misconduct is rare, false ideas inserted into key nodes in our body of scientific knowledge can warp our understanding.”
This article goes deeply into the fraud. It’s a great detective story. It raises a whole bunch of tangential issues.
For starters, the fact that you are even hearing about this is because the investigator (Matthew Schrag) didn’t wait for NIH to do anything – particularly after it AWARDED MORE MONEY TO THE FRAUDSTER.
Yes – you got that right.
He [Lesné] became a leader of UMN’s neuroscience graduate program in 2020, and in May 2022, 4 months after Schrag delivered his concerns to NIH, Lesné received a coveted R01 grant from the agency, with up to 5 years of support. The NIH program officer for the grant, Austin Yang—a co-author on the 2006 Nature paper—declined to comment.
Notice how the “revolving door” nature of the science is on display. “Insiders” who are buddies with and coworkers of “outsiders”, give those outsiders the precious grants.
However, Schrag was not caught with his pants down by NIH “Comeyism” (failure to discipline friends). Schrag had also taken his evidence to Science magazine. SMART MOVE. But then, it appears that Schrag was raised by Mennonites, home-schooled, and in the military. Interesting.
More from the Science article:
IN HIS WHISTLEBLOWER REPORT to NIH about Lesné’s research, Schrag made its scope and stakes clear: “[This] dossier is a fraction of the anomalies easily visible on review of the publicly accessible data,” he wrote. The suspect work “not only represents a substantial investment in [NIH] research support, but has been cited … thousands of times and thus has the potential to mislead an entire field of research.”
The agency’s reply, which Schrag shared with Science, noted that complaints deemed credible will go to the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity (ORI) for review. That agency could then instruct grantee universities to investigate prior to a final ORI review, a process that can take years and remains confidential absent an official misconduct finding. To Science, NIH said it takes research misconduct seriously, but otherwise declined to comment.
See how that works? Seriously – you CANNOT trust NIH, any more than you can trust Anthony Fauci.
NOW – things are starting to get interesting as all this news is hitting the mainstream media.
Gil00 brought me a link, in which the most famous coworker of the fraudster, Karen Ashe, finally responded to inquiries. Meanwhile, the fraudster has remained silent publicly. NOTE that in Schrag’s investigation (see below), Ashe was found innocent. ONLY in papers working with Lesné, were any of Ashe’s papers ever found to contain fraudulent images. Ditto for other authors. Lesné was the nexus of the fraud.
BUT the problem WAS spotted long ago, and yet this knowledge never bubbled up to a level of effectiveness in mainstream science. An early French coworker of Lesné found his images suspect, and refused to work with him after that.
From the Science article:
Questions about Lesné’s work are not new. Cell biologist Denis Vivien, a senior scientist at Caen, co-authored five Lesné papers flagged by Schrag or Bik. Vivien defends the validity of those articles, but says he had reason to be wary of Lesné.
Toward the end of Lesné’s time in France, Vivien says they worked together on a paper for Nature Neuroscience involving Aβ. During final revisions, he saw immunostaining images—in which antibodies detect proteins in tissue samples—that Lesné had provided. They looked dubious to Vivien, and he asked other students to replicate the findings. Their efforts failed. Vivien says he confronted Lesné, who denied wrongdoing. Although Vivien lacked “irrefutable proof” of misconduct, he withdrew the paper before publication “to preserve my scientific integrity,” and broke off all contact with Lesné, he says. “We are never safe from a student who would like to deceive us and we must remain vigilant.”
Schrag spot checked papers by Vivien or Ashe without Lesné. He found no anomalies—suggesting Vivien and Ashe were innocent of misconduct.
SO – what does Karen Ashe have to say?
University of Minnesota scientist responds to fraud allegations in Alzheimer’s research
While defending results, U researcher said it is “devastating” that a colleague might have doctored images.
A senior University of Minnesota scientist said it is “devastating” that a colleague might have doctored images to prop up research, but she defended the authenticity of her groundbreaking work on the origins of Alzheimer’s disease.
Dr. Karen Ashe declined to comment about a U investigation into the veracity of studies led by Sylvain Lesné, a neuroscientist she hired and a rising star in the field of Alzheimer’s research. However, she criticized an article in Science magazine that raised concerns this week about Lesné, because she said it confused and exaggerated the effect the U’s work had on downstream drug development to treat Alzheimer’s-related dementia.
“Having worked for decades to understand the cause of Alzheimer disease, so that better treatments can be found for patients, it is devastating to discover that a co-worker may have misled me and the scientific community through the doctoring of images,” Ashe said in an e-mail Friday morning. “It is, however, additionally distressing to find that a major scientific journal has flagrantly misrepresented the implications of my work.”
I’m undecided about this lady. This is a bit of a tangent, but it may be significant.
I trust her to some extent, based on the fact that Schrag found Ashe’s work CLEAN when it was NOT associated with Lesné. In my opinion she’s innocent.
AND YET, Ashe’s background is PERFECT for a two-stepper ChiCom, potentially brought to America as the child of secret socialist sleepers. [NOTE: “Two-steppers” are basically bi-generational spy families, with extreme cover used on the parents to throw off suspicions on the second generation as plants.] Ashe’s background – similar to that of the notorious Vindman twins, is also almost identical to several classic Chinese two-steppers in American media and politics, including relentless Trump character assassin, Weijia Jiang.
Video: Disenguous, pathetic stuff from @CBSNews's @Weijia Jiang, questioning the President's testing motives as suppressing them so as to tamp down case numbers and death tolls and then suggest he's playing politics with reopening state economies while Democratic governors aren't pic.twitter.com/acjiINrXxX
Video: @CBSNews's @Weijia Jiang came back for round two, bashing Trump for talking about testing like it's a "global competition" when so many are dying. Trump replies that she should ask China that question. So the media want Trump to ramp up testing, then hit him when he does?! pic.twitter.com/YYF13b3JrS
And don’t think this is just aimed at Karen Ashe – that I’m just blaming the innocent victim, which she may very well be. Let’s look at Sylvain Lesné. Let’s do a deep dive on the possibility that he was intentionally sabotaging science for more than just personal advancement.
This is just a theory to add to the pile of theories. But it’s a very intriguing theory, with enormous consequences, like – oh, say – “climate change”.
French communists, both agrarian and urban, are THICK in Normandy – where Sylvain Lesné grew up and went to university. The urban centers of Caen, Le Havre, and Rouen are communist strongholds.
You can see that Caen leans even further to the left than “worker’s paradise” Le Havre, where bleak Stalinist architecture rules. The vote against Le Pen was strong in Le Havre, but even stronger in Caen.
There is a reason why communism is persistent in Normandy. Not only is there a regional historical tradition of Jacobin thought – there was aggressive spread of Soviet-style communism to the area by Stalin, both before World War II and afterwards, in the devastation of the Allied liberation.
This was a significant part of the motivation for the Marshall plan – to not let the war feed Stalin’s slow but relentless ambitions, already at work in post-war France.
We already know that French “above-ground” communist Agnès Buzyn, who is weirdly allied with “conservative” Emmanuel Macron, was indicted for a plethora of COVID-19 “mistakes”, in which she seemed to aggressively “do the wrong thing” as COVID-19 began spreading into France.
We here in America are more familiar with one of these aggressive scientific mistakes – the “hiding” of hydroxychloroquine from the public by changing it from OTC to prescription only. (Please note that this “error” was at the bottom of the list, and is not even mentioned around the time of the indictment, which focused more on Buzyn’s downplaying of COVID dangers.)
Now – it’s very instructive to see how the French media (particularly the left-media, but all of it, really) has aggressively covered up for Buzyn on this point, with “fact-checking” in the Snopes style, where there are both clickbait strawmen and evasion on technicalities.
While the FORMAL reclassification of the drug HCQ from OTC to prescription occurred in January of 2020, which would make it seem more vindictive against Didier Raoult, and reactive against the treatment of the disease, that was merely the date of the effective reclassification.
The connection to Didier Raoult is a bit of a red herring, provided largely by his fan base. That is a typical irony useful to disinformation.
It turns out that the reclassification action itself took place in November of 2019. This point is then alleged by the fact-checkers to prove Buzyn’s “innocence”. As we now know, the deepest players in the COVID scam KNOWINGLY took many actions in September, October, and November of 2019.
Thus, in my opinion, these “fact checks” attempting to exonerate Buzyn’s scientific misconduct are in fact even more indicting, and indicative of her premeditated criminality.
Thus, if an analogous theory is correct, that Sylvain Lesné was intending to prop up bad science for more than just his own advancement, then there must be some VALUE in doing so.
Gil00 provided a possible answer to this – in thinking that perhaps there was an immunological connection to the scandal. THAT jumped out at me like a red flag. An immunity connection in Alzheimer’s is not only a known competitor of the beta amyloid theory – it fits in with my recent belief that the entire depopulation plot is connected to and being implemented through a very intentional and surreptitious set of actions leading to a decrease of individual human immunity, to make us EACH more vulnerable.
Thus, Lesné’s actions, which sent the majority of Alzheimer’s research down a primrose path to nowhere, may have been a DIVERSION away from the immunological origins of Alzheimer’s disease.
You know – an origin such as VACCINES.
Yes. Timing is everything.
NOW – even if Ashe and Lesné are completely innocent (and that would include brainwashing by communists), I think this is an EXCELLENT time to look at Alzheimer’s AGAIN, as a potential product of things like viruses and vaccines, which we KNOW can have neurological effects.
Yes. Vaccines which “go wrong” can affect the BRAIN through autoimmune actions.
Just sayin’.
III. Could Global Warming Concern in the Face of an Imminent Mini-Ice Age and an Incipient Full Ice Age Actually be Some Kind of Really Bad Science?
It should now be totally apparent that BAD SCIENCE on a global scale is not just possible – it’s EASY. This is without even bringing in the COVID debacle.
PLANET VULCAN, ANYONE?
You’ve seen it here in part I. BILLIONS of dollars have kept LIES alive and well in pharmaceutical science.
If it pays everybody to tell people there is a chemical imbalance that means they need a drug, it will be done, to sell the drug, or to tell the patient that there is hope. The bad information will be forwarded to doctors, and then to patients, to make those patients feel OK taking the drug. Eventually, it just becomes part of Fake Normal.
Consider (part II) that even a single author on a single scientific paper, followed by a few more images from that author on maybe a few dozen more papers, carrying subtle but convincing false evidence, can send BILLIONS of dollars, maybe tens or hundreds of billions of dollars, down a blind alley.
Not only that – the system will try to keep that money flowing in the same way, even when it is KNOWN by government bureaucrats to be based on faulty data.
Is it impossible that this kind of ERROR could extend to TRILLIONS of dollars?
I mean, who would actually WANT trillions of dollars?
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) were joined by Democratic lawmakers from both the House and Senate on February 7, 2019, to introduce Green New Deal legislation.
There is NOTHING in “anthropogenic global warming” or “climate change”, explained by the current theories, that cannot be explained equally well by the idea that a carbon dioxide prediction boondoggle (remember COVID models?) has occurred, as the result of BAD SCIENCE.
Indeed, the multiple and long-running FAILURES of the climate field would seem to this “poor” scientist to be rather similar to the FAILURES in anti-Alzheimer’s drugs. This kind of failure SHOULD point to severe theoretical problems in any NORMAL science situation, once freed from TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS of bad economic bets by politicians and financiers.
I remember – PERSONALLY – when we scientists were told by the leadership of the American Chemical Society that “anthropogenic global warming” was “settled science”. I knew MANY scientists in all branches of science – who were all SCIENTIFICALLY AFFECTED by this idea – who were still very actively debating the topic – and who like me were not convinced of AGW being real, true, or important, even if it did exist. The entire enterprise seemed HASTY and WRONG.
It seemed TOP-DOWN. It seemed IMPOSED. It seemed to contradict everything we knew about how science was supposed to operate – with major ideas normally taking YEARS if not DECADES of FIGHTING INSIDE SCIENCE to become crystal clear.
And OH YES – we had TIME.
SO – after reading about these two incidents of WRONG science being perpetuated by industry or academia, both knowingly and unknowingly, I do NOT think that “climate change” should be granted a pass.
I think the whole question of climate needs to “go back to the people”. That includes both SCIENTISTS who tell us WHAT IS FOUND, and THE PEOPLE who tell us WHAT MATTERS, once we find the truth.
Everybody else – the money, the media, the “leaders”, the shills, and the malevolent liars – need to get out of the way.
In particular, the MEDIA that pushes scientists’ opinions around with their “fake normal” and “fake science news” needs to STFU.
Don’t “trust the science”.
LET SCIENCE DISTRUST ITSELF.
And maybe, in fact definitely, YOU THE PEOPLE can help US, THE SCIENTISTS to DISTRUST SCIENCE……
Hopefully, this great couple is getting some REST, because they may NEED IT.
I am telling y’all – the Trumps may very well be on their way back to the White House in 1-3 years.
In fact, the way Obammunism has been “performing” – stumbling in disarray behind the HUMAN SHIELD Joe Biden, it looks like even the core plotters are having regrets and doubts now.
Mark “Drop Box Treason” Zuckerberg isn’t buying up land for his giant hideaway in Hawaii – only a SUBMARINE RIDE AWAY FROM CHINA – for no reason. He knows that there is a limited future for this insane, incompetent, incorrigible, and unelected OBOLA-BIDUNG regime, that he helped force upon ALL OF US.
SPIT!!!
The Business At Hand
This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).
And indeed, it’s Monday…again.
But we WILL get through it, TOGETHER.
The Rules
Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.
The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.
FOR EXAMPLE:
WE, the LINTARDS, the FLYNNTARDS, and the WeAin’tNeverGonnaWinTards are all welcome here, as long as we’re NICE ABOUT IT. The mutually odious viewpoints of disagreeing patriots are ALL welcome – those views just have to be expressed nicely, without accusing each other of being this, that, or the other.
Disagree with the material, not the character of the presenter.
Remember – Everybody is somebody else’s Ace Ventura.
As an alternative to character assassination, allow THE HOUSE to suggest better and more compelling material than the other person.
We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.
Those who cannot deal with this easy requirement will be forced to jump the hoops of moderation, so that specific comments impugning other posters and violating the minimal rules can be sorted out and tossed in the trash.
In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”
We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).
We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.
If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.
We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.
In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”
A Moment of Prayer
Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.
Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.
You may also pray for our enemies, the Crazy Mask-Wearing Democrats. Note that Benadryl and some of the other antihistamines that can save their lives from COVID cooties, also act as antipsychotics.
We’ll get to more about THAT in a moment.
MUSICAL INTERLUDE
For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.
Today’s gonna be a real grab-bag. Don’t click on what you may not like.
THE SCROLLBAR OR MOUSE WHEEL COULD BE YOUR FRIEND.
This one is a bit too “heavy metal” for many of us, but it brings to my mind some of the questions of TRANSHUMANISM.
Food for thought.
OK – maybe we should balance that out with a little country, like last week? Maybe a bit “old pop country” – whatever! Enjoy this flash-in-the-pan country duo act, who look far too much like something from the Monica Lewinsky era.
Well, we can’t have Country without “Western”!
So how about something very familiar, but maybe you never really thought about how WEIRD it is that it actually IS familiar………?
OK – this is really straying pretty far afield from WHEATIE MUSIC.
So how about a little more of THAT? In fact, how about 90 minutes of it?
Alright! THAT was sufficient preparation for MORE WEIRDNESS.
I used to love this song. Kinda glad the styles changed since then, however.
So how about some Vitamin B – as in BOLLYWOOD?
This stuff is surprisingly listenable.
https://youtu.be/9XJkQ2tnbO8
You know what? Let’s COOL IT ON DOWN with some CHURCH ORGAN, CITY STYLE……
And finally, let us CLOSE with an OPENING HYMN!
There you go. Around the world in 8 music videos.
Call To Battle
Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.
Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.
CAN AH GIT AN EYE-ROLL???
We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.
Joe Biden didn’t win.
And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.
Featured Story – Benadryl Could Have Saved Grandma / The Gatesification of Science
The Pub is OPEN again! With a blend of humor and seriousness, like any good bar, we celebrate this grand re-opening of WOLF’S PUB on Christmas Eve, December 24, 2021, by actually opening near closing time on Christmas Eve Eve, but what the heck. IT’S ALMOST CHRISTMAS. While our beloved bartender takes a needed break …
ARE YOU SEEING IT YET?
We will keep working on it until you do.
Today’s message is how BENADRYL provides ONE MORE EXAMPLE of a drug that showed a strong signal of benefit AND acceptable safety AND – shockingly – was very likely in the medicine cabinets of hundreds of thousands of people who died of COVID-19 NEEDLESSLY – simply because American medicine has been taken over at the top by the pharmaceutical industry and their financial backers.
They had to show us.
And they did.
If you are not familiar with my…..
finding of
explanation of
personal use of
support for
and
promotion of
…..the use of ANTIHISTAMINES as a simple, reliable, proven, and readily available “cure”, if you will, for “death by COVID”, then let me give you a quick list of my previous commentary and REFERENCES to this wonderful FACT.
Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …
I. The Clot Shot First things first. Nobody would be calling ALL of the various full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein vaccines “the clot shot” if there weren’t some clear and obvious problems with the full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein ITSELF. We already know that clotting dysfunction is key to COVID-19 pathogenicity. …
OK, people. It is time for THE WOLF to GET PATTON ON YOUR ASSES. As you may know, we now have many of our dear members actively fighting COVID-19, including one (gil00) in the hospital. Several have received Regeneron. Thus far, praise God, we have not lost anybody – and I intend to keep it …
After a lost week of human self-experimentation to survive multiply mutated Fauci-Baric China Virus, Wolf has obtained answers to a thousand questions. Here are just a few of those answers. Over the last week, overcoming my SECOND case of the China virus, I have been able to learn quite a bit about the enemy’s weaponry …
This is a quick update that is almost entirely GOOD NEWS, and that needs to SPREAD AROUND LIKE WILDFIRE – just like OMICRON. I will try to be brief and only comment as needed. 1 – A Case of Omicron Treated With HCQ Remember that case of COVID treated with ivermectin, that was published as …
The Pub is OPEN! Of course we’re open on New Year’s Eve, for goodness sake! However, the crooked and despicable Clot Shot Casino is now CLOSED (more details later), for outrageous offenses like THIS. Colorado casino customers prosecuted for playing abandoned slot credits Prepare to be outraged, even though this story is from over 5 …
If you follow through these SIX posts, you will see the progression of my thinking.
recognition of cheap, common antihistamine therapy as lifesaving at nearly 100% levels
dawning of realization that NIH, CDC, and big pharma were not truly looking out for patients
realization that individuals needed to be ready to save themselves and their friends, family, neighbors and loved ones with various therapeutics
what I learned by treating my own confirmed case of delta with selected therapeutics
confirmation of the generality and stage 2 mechanism of H1 antihistamine therapy
how antihistamine therapy was hidden by the media as compared to HCQ and ivermectin, on behalf of the larger plot to control humanity
Indeed, I now see the suppression of knowledge of the most readily available, inexpensive, extremely safe COVID therapeutics, as one of the greatest, saddest, and most horrifying instances of GASLIGHTING in history – not merely the history of science.
Humans on this planet were HYPNOTIZED into NOT USING the two most obvious drugs in their medicine cabinets – aspirin and antihistamines – which could have saved them from a new and sometimes deadly “cold”.
Ironic, isn’t it? The media tried to talk us us out of aspirin just before it would have saved millions of people from both the “clot disease” and even the “clot shot”.
Funny, that. But it gets worse.
My doctors and their nurses distinctly and repeatedly tried to steer me to acetaminophen (Tylenol) for COVID, despite the fact that there was, at that time, ESTABLISHED, PUBLISHED, SOLID, PEER-REVIEWED LITERATURE showing that low-dose aspirin reduces hospitalization and death from COVID-19 by around half. And the reason is obvious to anybody with a wisp of scientific understanding – even at high-school levels. Aspirin is a blood thinner and anticoagulant, and the bad effects of the disease (and the shots) are thrombotic. Simple.
If there was ever a time to take aspirin, it was for COVID. The suppressed FLCCC.net treatment recommends it. Why not the AMA?
Can’t they read the damn signal?
Can’t they understand relative risk and benefit?
Like I said, VACCINE HYPNOSIS.
Peter McCullough talks about this phenomenon of vaccine hypnosis in the scientific and medical communities, in his great interview with Joe Rogan, above. I think he uses a different term for it, but we’re talking about the same thing.
The hypnotic blindness toward active use of therapeutics was bad for HCQ and ivermectin, but it was even worse for antihistamines, because the deception got past even the most active members of the “therapeutic” community – MYSELF INCLUDED.
I was a HUGE backer of [HCQ + disease-conferred immunity] as the best therapeutic path forward, from the very beginning. I later began appreciating ivermectin, too, as the data rolled in.
Enjoy one of my memes inspired by Cari Kelemen on Twitter, with her great quote at the bottom.
The problem is, at the deepest part of the conspiracy, we were GASLIT into focusing on chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, and not gaining social momentum toward more readily available drugs (aspirin and common antihistamines) that could have REALLY changed the game – but which would have VERY RAPIDLY moved the global outcome away from the pointless, problematic, Gates-controlled vaccines.
Once you understand that we were CHUMPS who were CONNED away from antihistamines, you understand how smart these people REALLY are.
They’re tricky – SO tricky.
Hydroxychloroquine, and then ivermectin, WERE part of the gaslighting. We loved them, and still do, but don’t kid yourself. They are GOOD, SAFE, EFFECTIVE drugs. But BOTH are prescription drugs. They require doctors, and this brilliant chess move distracted the few honest doctors, looking for therapeutics, by a hidden, unconscious, alignment with “what they could do to help”.
THE PERFECT BAIT – for the “please help” scam.
It’s like putting a firehose in front of a fireman when there is a fire, and seconds to stop it. The fireman may not know that down under all that burning wood is a fire that would go out faster and better with something other than water, but they do the right thing, and go for the first and most obvious solution that appears, consistent with their own abilities.
We don’t like to think that we were suckered by a SECOND LAYER OF THE SCAM, but we were.
I was actually suckered by such a scam, years ago, in assisting the deceitful implementation of the current highly broken version of affirmative action in universities. It’s an interesting story, but I’ll save it for another time.
The point is, the best way to CON people is to GET THEM TO BUY IN ENTHUSIASTICALLY.
People usually don’t catch these masterful crimes until the crooks are long gone and got what they wanted. It’s infuriating, but the multi-layer “please help” scam is effective as – well – HELL.
Hollywood, of course, is quite familiar with such “plots”.
BUT ANYWAY…..
Let’s get down to business.
Up until now, the two, large-scale, clinically proven sets of antihistamines for COVID-19 have been the newest (cetirizine, loratadine, and fexofenadine) and one of the oldest (promethazine), but not one of the most obvious possibilities – diphenhydramine, otherwise known as Benadryl.
Well, it turns out that Benadryl has been showing ENORMOUS promise in the laboratory.
Now this particular researcher has been looking at a synergistic combination of diphenhydramine (Benadryl) with human lactoferrin, which achieves STUNNING results, in terms of ANTIVIRAL activity, albeit in vitro.
To quote the article:
The scientist who combined two widely available over-the-counter compounds that inhibited the novel coronavirus by 99% in early tests told WND he’s hopeful his treatment will be available “within months.”
“An FDA-approved treatment could be in sight within months if pharmaceutical companies utilize existing clinical trial resources,” said Dr. David Ostrov in an email interview with WND.
Let’s just quote that again for effect:
“An FDA-approved treatment could be in sight within months if pharmaceutical companies utilize existing clinical trial resources,” said Dr. David Ostrov in an email interview with WND.
To which the only proper response is…..
But wait – there’s moar!
Sadly, I’m sorry, but anybody who is still embedded in Fake Science and Fake Medicine needs to understand what I figured out while I was in the belly of the beast.
The people at the top, in Washington, DC, are no longer there to help the people.
They are there to help themselves.
Solutions are controlled by RETURN ON INVESTMENT – not by saved lives – THAT is secondary.
Which is too bad, because antihistamines are a solid cure against DEATH, per the Spanish study, and have a robust mechanism in both Stage 1 AND Stage 2 of COVID, with Ostrov’s work proving actual Stage 1 antiviral activity.
Please read the following comments by the scientist, Dr. David Ostrov, behind the study.
The story started before SARS, when my lab was studying drugs that bind ACE2, the molecule that turned out to be the receptor for SARS and SARS-CoV-2.
We previously found that an antihistamine (hydroxyzine) bound ACE2, and in 2020 were able to test the ability of this drug to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in the lab. It was an “aha” moment when the data clearly showed that a common antihistamine inhibited the virus that causes COVID. Different scientists at the University of Florida College of Medicine used different isolates of SARS-CoV-2, and the results agreed with each other. An antihistamine can inhibit the virus!
We then realized that there may be similar drugs that could inhibit the virus, perhaps even over-the-counter drugs. But which drugs?
We collaborated with investigators and UCSF where they examined the medical records for more than 219,000 people tested for SARS-CoV-2. They found that usage of diphenhydramine was associated with a lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2. In other words, in this population, people were less likely to be infected with COVID if they used diphenhydramine.
Why would taking an allergy pill lead to lower risk of COVID? There could be many reasons, but is it possible that a simple allergy pill can directly inhibit the virus that causes COVID?
We did the experiments at the University of Florida College of Medicine, and the data was published in a peer reviewed journal. Diphenhydramine exhibits direct antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2. Diphenhydramine inhibits virus replication, inhibits virus shedding and inhibits host cell killing.
This is all wonderful news, but it NEVER penetrated the “vaccine hypnosis”, and here is why. Again, a quote from the investigator, Dr. Ostrov.
My prediction is that antiviral drug combinations, such as diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, will provide a similar level of benefit as Regeneron monoclonal antibodies, Pfizer and Merck antivirals, at less than 1/100 the cost of those therapies.
There you go. Right there. “Less than one one-hundredth the cost” is NOT what these companies, bureaucrats, and politicians want to hear. They may nod and say “wonderful”, but if it does not cause as much “other people’s money” to move as the vaccines, then nobody will champion it.
However, that does NOT mean that WE THE LAB RATS can’t use the knowledge to save ourselves.
Ostrov is not stupid, and he gives up some crucial data while preserving his scientific credibility.
AND I QUOTE:
Ostrov told WND he’s been in communication with people who wonder if their use of the compounds has helped prevent them from getting COVID-19.
He noted that “anecdotal stories are certainly not proof of efficacy,” but many people have contacted him about diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, and their results “are difficult to ignore.”
“For many people, they say everyone around them got COVID, but not them,” Ostrov said.
And they ask the professor if diphenhydramine and/or lactoferrin.
“Without placebo controlled clinical trials, we will not have a definitive answer,” he said. “The answer for now, though, is maybe.”
Ostrov mentioned a contact who takes a daily dose of Benadryl and regularly drinks milk. She said she had been in close contact for hours with someone who was hospitalized the next day for COVID-19. But after waiting five days from the time of exposure, she tested negative for COVID.
He cautioned that people “considering their own concoction should understand that our experiments were carried out with human lactoferrin, not cow.” And the lactoferrin he used was purified in a special way to enhance its antiviral properties and is not likely to be found on the shelf.
People should consult with their physician, Ostrov said, before taking any drug for a use other than its intended use.
“Even though historically there are relatively few adverse events reported for diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, it should be noted that long term use of any medication, or combination of medications, could have unexpected consequences,” he said.
Ostrov said he hopes that once FDA-approved, “people may benefit from this antiviral drug combination for two-to-three month intervals during each wave of COVID infections.”
Notice that while Ostrov VERY HELPFULLY admits there is some real life usage of the drugs going on, and some success, he also downplays the admission to a politically correct level, using excuses that are completely mitigating against accusations of “recommendation”. The man is not stupid. He’s getting the word out, while staying in the lanes that Fake Science demands he stay in.
BUT – and this should be very clear – it’s obvious that people CAN and WILL make use of this cure – particularly the Benadryl. Thus, Ostrov makes a nicely balanced warning about long-term use of Benadryl, which is known to be potentially problematic, but also probably not an issue for most people who are treating or occasionally/periodically preventing COVID-19.
And, of course, there are many other antihistamines which are KNOWN TO BE SAFE for long-term usage, which are (IMO, based on the Spanish work) acceptable substitutes for Benadryl.
Let me add some other links on Benadryl that people may find useful.
One of the things to notice here is that this article was published over a year ago (December 2020), describing work that occurred over years before that, but that then ramped up under COVID during 2020.
In that ENTIRE TIME, at the same time Ostrov was doing foundational research, the clinical efficacy of THREE antihistamines was discovered, tested, demonstrated in a group of people, and published (March to September 2020) by the nursing home doctors in Spain. AND, during that time Dr. Chetty in South Africa demonstrated the clinical utility of promethazine in thousands of patients.
In a sane world, as soon as the Spanish results were RECEIVED for publication (September 2020), there should have been immediate emergency pre-publication for the benefit of clinicians. Instead, the paper was basically held until January 2021, when the vaccines were safely in production.
The SYSTEM is not designed to save lives in anything near an optimal fashion. It is designed to make money as a primary motivation, and – perhaps – THE primary motivation.
So why has Ostrov’s work apparently advanced no further toward treating people IN PRACTICE?
Because NOBODY in government or industry wants it. And they have OUR MONEY invested elsewhere.
Of course, that doesn’t mean there isn’t GREAT research going on. Just look at this confirmation of Dr. Chetty’s contention that antihistamines are useful in the treatment of “long COVID”.
“Well, I wouldn’t be so sure they do it alone, dude.”
Here is a guy – a recoveree – whose blood was found to be very lethal against SARS-CoV-2 – far more than most people’s blood.
Interestingly, the guy is something of a Benadryl addict due to allergies, and he took it during COVID.
Whether he took Benadryl prior to sample collection in July 2020 is unknown, but Benadryl is metabolized in the liver, otherwise by excretion to a lesser extent, so it’s possible that serum Benadryl could have enhanced the ability of any antibodies, by blocking ACE2 receptors while antibodies then bound to viral spike protein – a rather nifty tag-team effect.
You will see that this story is filled with coincidences – for example, the writer is the director of communications at the university that was running the study, and already knew the head of the study. He then volunteered to be tested, directly to that person, while doing a story.
And you know what I think of “their” journalists. LOW-GRADE SPIES AND PROVOCATEURS.
I don’t want to speak for Sadie, but if she throws a “Suspicious Cat at this story, I’m ready to throw FOUR of them.
AND I QUOTE:
I didn’t know it at the time, but my unlikely story had begun after becoming heavily congested to start the last week of March 2020. I had NO other symptoms whatsoever besides repeatedly having to blow my nose. Pollen was everywhere that time of year as per usual, so I just naturally attributed my sudden nasal issues to that. I loaded up on Benadryl and was feeling 100 percent again by week’s end four days later. There was never as much as a single thought that I had contracted COVID-19.
John Hollis
So the writer had COVID during the last week of March 2020, loaded up on Benadryl, finished out a very typical “good” case in 4 days, and very likely continued taking Benadryl, at least on occasion, for allergies.
AND I QUOTE AGAIN:
The George Mason antibody study, which began in April, was unique in that it was a saliva-based test rather a blood-based one and would eventually be used to screen students, faculty and staff. Mason was among the nation’s first universities to take this approach in the fight against the spread of the virus and maintains one of the only 13 National Institutes of Health-sponsored Biosafety Level 3 Biomedical Research Laboratories equipped to handle live COVID-19 samples from which Dr. Liotta and his team could quickly test.
Now jump to mid-July 2020.
As George Mason University’s Communications Manager, I had received word in mid-July that the scientists had come across some positive initial results.
I soon met with Dr. Liotta at his office on George Mason’s Science and Technology Campus in Manassas, Virginia to discuss their findings. I’ve known him for a few years now after having previously worked with him on other projects, so we’ve had a good relationship for a while. I was about to leave his office when I casually mentioned to Dr. Liotta that the guy I lived with had become terribly sick with the virus in early April. I had been so certain at that time that a similar fate or worse also awaited me that I even penned a letter to my teenage son just in case. I considered myself incredibly lucky to have gone unscathed.
This is when he volunteered for the test.
Or so I believed at the time.
So I figured there was no harm in asking if I could join the several hundred volunteers who had already participated in the study. Dr. Liotta agreed and I returned a few days later to give blood and saliva samples as a late addition to the research. The whole process took maybe 30 minutes.
This is how the story wraps up.
I was still of the belief that I had somehow dodged the bullet back in April and never even considered that I might have already contracted the virus, let alone that it may have been I who passed it on to my housemate. I had no reason to anticipate anything whatsoever coming of my lab results.
But after further careful analysis of my blood, Dr. Liotta and his team soon confirmed that I had contracted an American strain of the virus while also explaining to me exactly how and where the “super” antibodies had attacked and entirely eradicated the virus from my body. My blood has since proven equally as effective in killing every different strain of COVID-19, including the latest highly transmissible variants from both the U.K. and South Africa. I can’t even be a carrier for the virus.
I’ve been told this is somewhat akin to the medical equivalent of finding the Holy Grail.
I was one of eight people who participated in the study found to have “super” antibodies, with each person showing varying levels of natural protection from the virus. In addition to its ability to so effectively neutralize COVID-19, my blood is unique because the “super” antibodies in it have remained highly concentrated nearly a year after my infection. Most people’s antibodies typically wane significantly after 60 to 90 days.
How and why my body does this remains the million dollar question, but it means that I and others like me are best-suited to possibly help scientists mass reproduce antibodies like mine in the hopes of creating a treatment for COVID-19 and a lasting and far more effective vaccine.
It’s been sobering to think that my blood and that of others like me could potentially save thousands of lives or perhaps more.
So then imagine the irony of my having been randomly selected seven times for COVID testing between late September 2020 and March 2021. Each of the occasions—all with negative results—were part of George Mason University’s comprehensive Safe Return to Campus plan. It’s made for some good laughs and I’ve never once minded the very slight inconvenience. It’s like taking a test when you’ve been given all the answers in advance.
I’ve been very fortunate and feel blessed beyond measure.
Notice the TWOKICKERS which are to me indicative of a non-protein, small-molecule therapeutic in his plasma, with a longer half-life than more denaturable and strain-specific antibodies.
My blood has since proven equally as effective in killing every different strain of COVID-19, including the latest highly transmissible variants from both the U.K. and South Africa. I can’t even be a carrier for the virus.
I was one of eight people who participated in the study found to have “super” antibodies, with each person showing varying levels of natural protection from the virus. In addition to its ability to so effectively neutralize COVID-19, my blood is unique because the “super” antibodies in it have remained highly concentrated nearly a year after my infection. Most people’s antibodies typically wane significantly after 60 to 90 days.
SO – honestly – I think it would be very interesting to discover exactly how much Benadryl was in his blood samples when he took tests, and which may still be in those samples.
Why, this story could get even more interesting.
Are they toying with us?
I don’t know. Toying is a way of testing, is it not?
I can certainly think of the propaganda value of converting the strength of the “enemy position” – the “evolutionary solution” (therapeutics like Benadryl) into a story about antibodies (the “revolutionary solution”) – which supports both new vaccines and new, expensive, antibody therapies.
(See my prior discussion of Faucism as modern Lysenkoism for that to make sense.)
Anybody seeing how that works? It’s very Marxist, actually.
Is there some Gramsci in Fauci? Maybe nearby? Interesting times.
BACK TO ETHICAL QUESTIONS
The ever-vulgar, ever-right Karl Denninger CLUED ME IN, by virtue of a rather ranty rant, to a post by one of the best voices in the world of SCIENCE and REASON – a guy named The Ethical Skeptic.
TES, as he is known, is framing the “go home and take Tylenol and die or don’t die from COVID” therapy that most of us got, as a kind of INVOLUNTARY CONTROL EXPERIMENT – including DENIAL OF TREATMENT – without our informed consent.
I think his approach is VERY powerful.
AND I QUOTE:
In other words, I was allowed to choose whether I would be a member of the ‘no treatment allowed’ control group or alternately one of the vaccine test groups; however, through denying me timely treatment, I was not offered the ethical choice of not participating in the experiment altogether.
Neither was I informed as to the nature of this experiment, nor was I made aware that other treatments or therapies were at my avail, should I decline participation. I was fraudulently coerced by a medical professional (and by advising health officials) into the belief that I had no choice, I had to participate. My life was endangered and I was exposed to unnecessary amounts of suffering and expense as a result of this coerced experiment. I was not offered the remedies or recourse to address the situation in the instance where the experiment failed (it did fail) or failed to ensure my safety, nor was I given the opportunity to bring the experiment to an end.
What this really shows us is how BADLY medicine has been overrun by both corporate and government interests, which are now allied against medical freedom, and even against truth itself in science and medicine.
Back to McCullough.
SIGNALS OF BENEFIT and ACCEPTABLE SAFETY.
Not what we’re seeing with the limited choices being offered by establishment medicine and government, and which are clearly being LIED about by the narrative enforcers of social media.
The fact that Anthony Fauci and Gilead Pharmaceuticals would promote a drug (remdesivir) that had – AT BEST – no better signals of benefit than hydroxychloroquine – BUT that had FAR WORSE SAFETY – and that also had – admittedly – a higher profit margin……
Well, that pretty much tells you all you need to know about “ethics” in “Deep Science”.
And remember – Anthony Fauci’s WIFE is some kind of “ethics czarina” at NIH. A VERY interesting family, including a daughter at Twitter.
I have been a poor and rotten servant of the Lord during my too long and too miserable life. I have made innocent women cry. I have led others astray. I have turned away from those in need in their time of need, and I have lied to myself and to God about why I …
There will be justice for Veronica Wolski, because we will DEMAND IT. And until there IS justice, we will drag the CRIMES of Anthony Fauci and Gilead “Pharmaceuticals” and their SLEAZY ASSOCIATES thorough the headlines, over and over, until people SPIT IN THEIR PATH as they walk down the streets. So where do we begin? …
Well, they can lock us out of The Q Tree, but they can’t stop the truth from getting out. Enjoy a post first over on The U Tree and now HERE. Here is a quickie in my WAR ON REMDESIVIR. Fellow Treeper barkerjim dropped an interesting document today, from back in July, which showed the …
My dear wife is the one who found this, so let me start off by thanking her. After working outside Tuesday night, I came in the front door, and my wife IMMEDIATELY told me to start watching what was on OAN. It was an anonymous Rumble video about ivermectin and remdesivir that OAN re-bannered and …
The point is simple.
Benadryl is EVEN SAFER than hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, by many standards, seeing that it is considered safe for OTC, and those other drugs are not.
Benadryl meets the McCullough Criteria – Signals of Benefit and Acceptable Safety.
And Benadryl is already out there – ready to help people get through COVID.
We also have other, more modern antihistamines – PROVEN to save lives from COVID-19, in the Spanish study.
In my opinion, antihistamine therapy is the baseline outpatient therapy that should have been mass-introduced globally, to practically eliminate death from COVID.
But DEEP SCIENCE had other ideas.
Just as I believe there was a conspiracy of interest against hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, I believe there was an even deeper conspiracy against the more readily available antihistamines.
And I believe that unless people answer for these crimes, there will be more like them in the future.
Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:
eleutherophobia
noun
fear of freedom
From Ancient Greek ἐλευθερία (eleuthería, “freedom”) + -phobia.
el-ūth-er-o-fō′bi-a, el-ūth-er-o-mā′ni-a, etc.
Used in a sentence:
The eleutherophobia of many rank-and-file Democrats is a useful tool of the miseleutheric Democrat / Communist leadership. The eleutherophilia if not eleutheromania of the true patriot is rarely found among Democrats these days, thanks to socialist infiltration and control of the party.
Used in a video:
This guy is a bit of a trip – not exactly our style of patriot, but he belongs to an interesting bunch.
They could use a bit more Biblical wisdom, IMO, and perhaps a bit less “woo”, but at least they’re not eleutherophobes.
Prepare to be outraged, even though this story is from over 5 years ago.
A guy who found $2 in credit left on a slot machine, played it before he put his own money into “his” machine, and was PROSECUTED for “fraud” with a big fine. Yup. Any credits left on a machine belong to the house, if a person leaves them. The house then MONITORS this crap on security camera.
So they don’t let the guy pay the $2, but shake him down with arrest, booking, charges, and ultimately a PLEA BARGAIN and a CRIMINAL RECORD. Everybody in the FAKE LEGAL SYSTEM gets rich except the CHUMP, who should have taken it to court, even though there was probably a dirty judge on it, too.
Clearly the whole thing is a SCAM set up with dirty law enforcement. In fact, it would not surprise me if CHUMPS were being set up by the casino (intentionally left machine credits) to take these falls.
Meanwhile, FBI goes after patriotic Americans.
Gambling. It’s just DIRTY. That’s why you won’t find CLOTTERY TICKETS here in WOLF’S PUB.
Meanwhile in Amateur Bartender Land…..
While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we will ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.
Because we did alcohols last week, including menthol, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine, we’ll try some amines this week.
Alcohols begin with the structural moiety -OH whereas amines begin with -NH2. The familiar ethanol is CH3-CH2-OH. Replacing the H on the oxygen of alcohols turns them into things which act completely differently (ethers, esters, etc.), and are no longer called alcohols. In contrast, the H atoms of “primary amines” (-NH2) can be replaced (-NH-, -N(-)-, -N=, etc.), and much of the chemical behavior frequently remains, in which case the substances may still be called amines.
This classification scheme for organic substances is complicated, historical, and sensible, but it is also admittedly very obscure.
Think of amines as nitrogen horning on on oxygen‘s act in the alcohol world. Compared to the very familiar ethanol, other alcohols are different enough, but amines create a whole new ball game. For over a century, amines were possibly the biggest act in the world of pharmaceuticals.
The following three amines are second generation antihistamines.
More on these substances later!
Christmas Spirit
As we are going to keep the Christmas spirit going into 2022, you will note that ornaments are still up – including various old favorites from Christmas Past.
First lady Melania Trump tosses an ornament to a child across the table after he tossed one to her as she visits with children in the East Room among the 2017 holiday decorations with the theme “Time-Honored Traditions” at the White House in Washington, Monday, Nov. 27, 2017. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
We will get that tree up, no matter how much flak from the cultural Marxists!
And there will be GIFTS for all, both NAUGHTY and NICE!!!
How did you like those pictures of Trump and MELANIA???
PSSST! Hey, kid! I’ve got some pictures…….
Trump Calendars
People – it’s getting close to the time to make a decision. Do you want a TRUMP CALENDAR for 2022?
I’m going to let you know about TWO of them that you can get. They ship VERY QUICKLY, too!
Official Trump Calendar
This is a GREAT calendar – heavy on military photos – plenty of Melania.
I can vouch for this one – easily worth the $45 minimum donation to SAVE AMERICA – meaning 90% goes to TRUMP’S CONTROL.
Please let us all know in comments if you order either of these and encounter either success or failure.
And now, the rules of the pub.
HOUSE RULES
God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.
Now, back to business.
AMEN!
Current Art On The Wall
First a bit of pub introspection…..
…..and then some comic relief on the wall in the john!
The Clot Shot Casino is CLOSED
The “ever-mouthy” Karl Denninger has just pointed out some numbers in the Danish Omicron data that really change my perception of relative risks and benefits of vaccination – particularly in light of what we now know about common H1 antihistamines as a class essentially preventing death from COVID.
This is less about SIDE EFFECTS (adverse events – whatever) and more about IMMUNITY STRATEGY.
Multiple questions are now answered by this fresh data for a new variant.
First, it’s very clear that the “Wuhan vaccines” are rather BADLY protective against Omicron. While I would not call it a “pandemic of the vaccinated”, the vaccinated ARE over-represented in Omicron cases, and the unvaccinated are under-represented. At least one analyst has speculated that Omicron might have escaped from a laboratory, where it “gained function” in the serum of vaccinees.
The recently boosted have a risk comparable to the unvaccinated, but the vaccinated as a whole are actually MORE LIKELY to get Omicron, which is weird. Combined with the fact found elsewhere, that almost 5% of Danish Omicron patients already had COVID-19, then “Wuhan natural immunity” is suffering its own form of breakthrough as well.
Fine. So the vaccines need boosters, and risks accumulate. The disease is also risky, and not as protective as we had thought.
BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR.
Let’s look at that fact – that the VACCINATED (overall) are being hammered harder than the unvaccinated, relative to their proportion in the population.
One explanation is that the “unvaccinated” include a bunch of people who were “vaccinated” by the disease, and have SUPERIOR natural immunity.
Another explanation is that the current Wuhan-variant vaccines are immunizing against the now-absent Wuhan variant, but are LOWERING immunity to new and changed variants- perhaps after some initial immunity, but then waning. And THAT is not an unknown phenomenon.
And, of course, there is the third option, that it is BOTH of those two things.
No matter which way it is, this is not good news for the vaccines. This DATA says that – in real life – “natural immunity” / “no vaccine” is a solid form of protection, and is about as good as “boosterism”. Worse than that, for the vaccines, it appears that “missing the booster” (“2 shots” in the table) leaves one EXTREMELY VULNERABLE to the disease – much more so than being totally unvaccinated.
THIS is starting to explain why the CDC is playing WORD GAMES with “unvaccinated”, where they call people who just got vaccinated “unvaccinated” to blame-cast adverse events as disease, tinkering with THOSE numbers, but they ALSO call people who got two shots “unvaccinated” after some time, when those people are actually “vaccinated but now in vaccine failure”.
Don’t play those word games with me, Dr. Fauci. Those “unvaccinated” people TOOK THE JAB. They’re “vaccinated”. And with TIME, vaccination looks to be a LOSER unless you get REVACCINATED.
How about we use the word “revaccinated”? It’s a bit more honest.
ANYWAY……
Thanks to this recent data, and some other earlier thoughts, two things have become CLARITIN CLEAR.
(1) – Nobody needs to die from COVID, because, if the murderous media would simply tell people, there ARE in fact some common, cheap, easy-to-get, over-the-counter drugs that essentially make it impossible to die from the disease, while in the process obtaining superior “natural” immunity.
(2) – Even if one wants to GAMBLE with the vaccines, which offer less “disease” but also less “immunity”, the vaccines seem to make people MORE susceptible to sufficiently mutated coronavirus variants. That is, unless one gets a booster. Thus, they’re ADDICTIVE, just like gambling and smoking, making one DEPENDENT on the vaccines.
Wherein we explain – at three different levels of scientific and political understanding – how ADE-mediated vaccine slavery works. This post is to PREPARE YOU to watch what the other side is doing RIGHT NOW, so you can spot the deceptions. Right now they are DESPERATELY trying to make a FAILING PLAN work. Their plan …
Is that GOOD? Seriously – is that good? Is it “good” to be dependent for your VERY LIFE on vaccines?
I, personally, don’t think so. It’s like making everybody an insulin-dependent diabetic. And look what Joe Biden (really that asshole Obola) just did to diabetics! A thousand dollars a month! Ridiculous. Recombinant insulin was supposed to FREE our diabetics – not make them slaves!
Because of this, it is not really possible for me to recommend the vaccines as anything more than a RISKY CONVENIENCE – a GAMBLE – by which one avoids a biannual, triennial, or maybe (if you’re lucky) decennial cold or flu, but one also becomes dangerously dependent on the vaccines.
THUS, the CLOT SHOT CASINO (and COVIDIUM DEN) is CLOSED.
You are welcome to gamble elsewhere, but we cannot support gambling in this pub.
So let me state this VERY clearly.
If you are aware of the simple CURE for hospitalization and death from COVID itself, then the addictive, immunity-decreasing vaccines make no sense. This is true EVEN neglecting side-effects, which are substantial AND cumulative.
Now – let me be very clear. But I may have to whisper. And you probably won’t believe me, even after I explain it.
How to Hide a Histaminimus
When I was a kid, one of my favorite books was How to Hide a Hippopotamus.
It was a great lesson in concealment. It was the beginning of understanding.
So what does that have to do with today?
Well, I have a theory. And if that theory is right……
The true “cure” for COVID was never hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin.
These were silver-plated shiny objects – “real” distractions – that allowed the con-job vaccines to move forward. This is why the con-job shiny objects were SEEDED to us in various ways by the other side, who are tricky as hell. They needed to make sure we reacted in a predictable way.
Remember this one?
Or how about THIS ONE?
See what I’m saying? That episode makes far more sense as a PLANNED DISTRACTION than a real “WOO WOO” tell of the drug they were afraid of.
Hollywood WANTED us pointed in a certain direction, by which our PRE-PLANNED OPPOSITION would proceed according to THEIR timetable.
They KNEW how we would react.
Hydroxy and ivermectin were “working shiny objects” that we would predictably glom onto, while missing the REAL fast and easy solution. Missing the real solution, and glomming onto THEIR crippled partial solutions, controlled and denigrated by the other side, would allow THEIR disingenuous solution – injected spike protein toxin – to move forward unopposed.
The real “cure” – the one that the Spanish doctors and the South African doctor found – was simply to take H1 antihistamines and STOP the second phase of the disease.
That’s all. That’s all that’s needed to make COVID-19 a COLD again. Treat it LIKE a cold used to be treated.
Both first and second generation over-the-counter antihistamines work for this. They attack the ROOT of the deaths from COVID, which is the spike protein hypersensitivity reaction that Dr. Chetty describes, and with which everybody is familiar, although perhaps under a variety of immunological descriptions like “cytokine storm”.
Now I’m not saying that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are not effective treatments. Indeed, they are. The other side HAD to oppose those, precisely because they work, and because they diminish hospitalization and death in a very significant way – especially if started EARLY.
BUT those solutions are controlled and media-deniable by the other side. They were never a threat. They are not something the other side had to HIDE. They are something they had to effectively OPPOSE.
That is why the other side used two different approaches. For hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, they used psychological seeding, media denunciation, and institutional opposition and control. For antihistamines, they used diversion to other drugs, media silence, and institutional delay.
The deeper truth is that, had we learned about over-the-counter antihistamines effectively ending death from COVID in early 2020, it would have cut off their vaccine plot AT THE KNEES.
Imagine, if you will, some intrepid journalists being alerted in early 2020 that the Spaniards or Dr. Chetty had something IN HAND that would prevent death by COVID, and it was something a lot of people were taking already for colds and flu. In fact, most families ALREADY had the cure in their houses, because ANY of the H1 antihistamines will do. Imagine what would have happened to vaccines if a “home cure” would have been a worldwide rumor – and then CONFIRMED by the people themselves – and then trumpeted by the frightened media, should they “defect” from the narrative.
THAT is the secret that could not get out.
But if everybody chased the RIGHT drugs – the ones that THEY could control…… – the ones that THEY could denigrate, and fund studies to “disprove”…….
No problem. For THEM.
Marxist Tedros with communist Agnes Buzyn, who stopped prescription of hydroxychloroquine in France.
Do you now see WHY – at a very deep level – Agnes Buzyn made a show of restricting hydroxychloroquine?
THE MEDIA was the real weapon. There was no “walking back” the cure that was already out there, everywhere. They had to make sure we followed the cure that they controlled.
I’m not saying that Agnes Buzyn KNEW this, any more than President Trump KNEW that hydroxychloroquine was a calculated proffering to conceal a more critical weakness. People are led, misled, ordered to do things, and ordered not to do things, knowing that they will respond in certain ways.
I do think the liar Fauci may have known about antihistamines.
In fact, I suspect that VERY FEW people knew the truth about antihistamines, before the COVID release. Maybe only the TOP cabal actors.
Sometimes we have biases on the treatment side. Some folks like hydroxychloroquine. Some folks like ivermectin. Some like fluvoxamine. The list goes on.
The other side did NOT have a BIAS in opposing, controlling, silencing, or otherwise negating the threat of ANY and ALL of the treatment options.
They had a STRATEGY.
Now, I have a similar approach. I like ALL the treatment options, because they all save lives.
Right now, though, I favor bringing attention to antihistamines for a STRATEGIC reason.
It is ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE to kill us with COVID if we have FOUR THINGS.
A thermometer
An antigen test kit
Antihistamine
Azithromycin (doctors prescribe this easily)
It’s that simple. This is a simplification of the Spanish study into an “at home” cure.
People monitor their temperature
If a fever, then use an antigen test kit
If positive for COVID, take the antihistamine
If pulmonary complications, take the azithromycin
This is simply too easy, and everybody can do it.
Jo Nova has a great blog post on the Spanish study.
There would NEVER have been a push for the mRNA vaccines, or vaccine passports, if enough people – a critical number – had known about the Spanish results in – say – June of 2020.
Even when it was submitted as a paper in September of 2020, if it was big news, it would have complicated the vaccine roll-out. Vaccine passports would NOT have been realistic.
That is why the Spanish study didn’t really see the international light of day, until the vaccines were rolling out, in January 2021.
Received 16 September 2020, Revised 29 December 2020, Accepted 11 January 2021, Available online 16 January 2021.
You will recall that – because Obama and Obama’s people are essentially running the Biden administration – at least until Kamala and Hillary take over – I am blaming the insane and inhumane pricing of insulin squarely on the REAL acting President…..
OBOLA.
Now – I used to call Obola “Obola” all the time, back during his cavalier attitude toward Ebola, back in the day.
Little did I realize that the Ebola crisis was all a PSY-OP of the GRANDEST order.
We can now see that Obola was priming the right to run like a bull at the red cape of “airborne Ebola” which was used to deceive us about the lethality of COVID-19.
Obola’s cavalier attitude toward Ebola virus was 100% intentional. That’s easy to see, now.
BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR!
Thanks to Deplorable Patriot, J.P. Sears, and Holly, we now have additional proof that the Ebola psy-op was definitely part of the COVID plot.
Let’s start here.
For now, just understand that A.416 was a BILL that would have empowered “Cuomo in a skirt”, Kathy Hochul, to have almost limitless dictatorial powers.
Let’s just save that tweet image, since COMMIES love to hide evidence.
We know this guy Nick Perry is a commie, because Aubergine did research tying him to the reelection campaign of Percy Sutton, one of the BIGGEST communists of the MASSIVELY communist, red diaper, Sutton family, which – again – Aubergine has deeply researched.
A while ago, Wolfmoon mentioned the name Percy Sutton in a response to my inquiry about what type of material he wanted for the site while he was away. Wolfmoon stated: “I also have an interest in “red diaper theory”, so the genealogy of all “red diaper lineages” is of interest. I have some projects …
Oh, Percy Sutton was one of the KEY communists in New York City. If Nick Perry was close to this guy, you can COUNT on secret membership, and very likely a DIAPER, too.
For a humorous yet very serious take, I give you Mr. Magnesium himself!
Yeah. So a guy strongly connected to a notorious NYC communist proposes a BILL during the phony Ebola crisis, over 5 years ago, which languishes until it’s needed NOW, in the phony COVID crisis, for New York State to go FULL COMMIE.
You know what……..
And if you’re wondering where communism REALLY comes from…..
Minion Meets Master
I don’t get clear demonstrations like this very often, of something which is a strong signal of SATANIC ACTIVITY. Thus, it’s important that I share it with you.
I think it’s pretty clear at this point that the Kardashian world of “people who are famous for being famous” is more than a little connected to YOU KNOW WHO…..
In fact, let’s remind ourselves, who the latest “famiac” in the Kardashian-Jenner tribe happens to be.
I won’t spend time unraveling the twisted relationships in “Kardashian World”, but between the Jenner klan, Kanye West, and Travis Scott, it’s 200 proof Hollywood.
For those who want to dig into the relationships (not recommended), start HERE.
From what I read elsewhere, she was more of an “ex” business manager, but she was actively working that bunch and others.
I will spare you the gruesome details, but not my conclusion – that this was the evil one collecting his due.
Do NOT – I repeat – DO NOT get involved with this stuff. Keep it at bay. STAY AWAY.
A certain amount of AWARENESS is good. “Wise as serpents” is a survival skill in spiritual warfare. We need some folks who train to see the traps. But it helps not to get jaded, familiar, or worst of all comfortable with the dark side. Periodic REVULSION is necessary.
What you are seeing here is the CONSUMPTION of those who make deals with the devil. They are CONSUMED IN THE FLAMES of the EVIL ONE when their usefulness is over.
I am sure this talented lady was well-rewarded for promoting the people she promoted, but she was likewise promoting everything at the top of Satan’s wish list for humanity.
In the end she was consumed, Ninth Gate-style.
I will skip the image of Frank Langela consumed in flames – and stick with this one.
Don’t make deals with this stuff – even small ones.
Are y’all good? AMEN! So STAY THAT WAY.
General Flynn on Exposing TRUTH
After Gen. Flynn’s “misunderstanding” (at best) or misrepresentation (at worst) of that rather culty Christian prayer in the name of the angel Michael as being “Catholic”, when it was clearly at best “small c catholic” (meaning under the umbrella of all Christianity, multi-schismatic or not, and even including “weird AF New Age”), I honestly feel a bit of a chafe under my very loose collar to be quoting Flynn on ANYTHING related to the subject of “exposing truth”.
I mean, the guy is a spy. Disinformation has to be a huge part of the job.
However, none of that diminishes what he says here. So just take a listen.
The inspection [of dominion machines] had been scheduled for earlier this month but the [PA] state attorney general and secretary of state oddly sued to prevent any such move to affirm the accuracy of the 2020 election results.
[per the court] It’s now set for Jan. 10.”
While everyone is fighting back on the covid insanity, watching the results of the Maxwell trial outcome, still reeling from outrageous illegal and massive border crossings, the lies and deceit of the 1/6 insurrection crucifixion (read Revolver and follow Darren Beattie), etc, etc…
The truth will always rise to the top. Those that live in the darkness will be destroyed by the light of the truth.
Keep doing all you can to expose the truth…I know it is not easy and it takes time to discover, research and read or listen to the various interviews, but do it for the good of our country and our kids.
Elements (elected and unelected) within our USG are so corrupt, it is disgusting. However, with the right attitude, leadership, discipline, and focus, much of this corruption can be cleaned up.
Get involved! Make Local Action your thing and do more for your community and our country
Wolf again. I think he’s got that right.
The truth WILL rise to the top.
Sometimes, that truth may make US sweat a little bit – like when I have to admit that I was a cheerleader for the vaccines before they became the “clot shot”. But that’s OK. We can’t always be RIGHT. But we CAN always TRY to be right. Even after we fail. Maybe ESPECIALLY after we fail.
And – ironically – that is both SCIENCE and – for some of us – RELIGION.
Happy New Year, y’all. Please STAY SAFE. Don’t drink and drive, yada, yada, yada.
If you DO go out and party, and you’ve not had COVID recently (Delta or later), then spend the next FOUR DAYS (incubation period) collecting everything you need to get through a wonderful case of the traveling vaccine, OMICRON.
(Or OBOLA, as I am starting to call it.)
Assuming you don’t have ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, you need:
Wolf’s COVID Care Package
Thermometer (thermal digital is easiest)
Antigen test kit(s) (yeah, good luck finding one)
Antihistamine of your choice (Claritin, Zyrtec, and Allegra are the easiest – 1-2 a day)
Aspirin (regular, or low-dose if your stomach doesn’t like it – 1 a day)
Listerine or Betadine mouthwash/gargle for mouth and throat
Vitamin D, Zinc, Calcium, Magnesium, Multivitamin including Selenium.
Quercetin (including natural sources) or Green Tea
Saline or other nasal spray, rinse, or wash of your choice
The thermometer tells you when to use your precious test kit – when you suddenly have a fever and a sore or tingly throat.
The test kit gets you a positive diagnosis that opens doors for things like antibodies, or an official test.
A positive test means you can BEGIN TREATMENT at THERAPEUTIC DOSES.
The antihistamine insures that YOU WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY NOT DIE, because it stops the second, allergic, inflammatory stage of COVID in its tracks.
The aspirin makes doubly sure you won’t get clots, but be careful – don’t take it if you’ve had trouble with aspirin. Talk to your doctor if unsure.
The gargles (Listerine or Betadine) massively reduce viral load and speed time to recovery.
The saline and nasal washes lower viral load, and maintain nasal breathing.
The quercetin and green tea help zinc’s antiviral action by increasing cellular zinc levels.
The vitamins and mineral supplements keep you at antiviral levels of these things. In particular, zinc and vitamin D3 need to be at non-deficient levels.
Please consult authoritative sources from TRUE medical doctors like the ones at https://flccc.net.
Now – THAT is your physical health.
BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR!
Your SPIRITUAL HEALTH is – in my opinion – what really matters. I strongly recommend DAILY readings from the Bible. Doesn’t have to be much. Whether it’s Duchess’s comments, or a daily reading from a pocket devotional, if you get in the habit of thinking about the Bible EVERY DAY, you will do GREAT.
Thank you all for being here. Have a wonderful 2022.
W
9 In the first year of Darius son of Xerxes[a] (a Mede by descent), who was made ruler over the Babylonian[b] kingdom— 2 in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, understood from the Scriptures, according to the word of the Lord given to Jeremiah the prophet, that the desolation of Jerusalem would last seventy years. 3 So I turned to the Lord God and pleaded with him in prayer and petition, in fasting, and in sackcloth and ashes.
There are days that I’m DAMN GLAD our beautiful FLOTUS Melania is finally getting a break, but still – the ILLEGITIMACY of the Biden administration BURNS LIKE A TORCH.
If we have a second Trump Administration, I hope the Deep State gets put down like a RABID DOG in the process, if they try ANYTHING that even remotely resembles what they did the first time.
Like “fortifying” the election. GAWD, how cynical.
HA! FU, commies. WE’RE WISE.
I think they’re nervous they won’t be able to pull off an even half-way believable electoral coup this time. CREEPS.
From what I understand, the military traitors who assisted the coup are now nervous, and this is responsible for those 3 Democrat generals making the weird noises of worry about another “insurrection”.
HA!
GOOD. They should be nervous. They’re partially responsible for all this crap we’re going through, including the Afghanistan exit debacle. SHAME!
IDIOTS!
The Business At Hand
This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).
And indeed, it’s Monday…again.
But we WILL get through it, and we will get through it STRONGLY.
The Rules
Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading a second or third time.
The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.
EXAMPLE:
Flatards and spherecucks are both welcome here. The spherecucks make it difficult to question our deep respect and love for modern science, despite our rabid love of God. The flatards not only demonstrate our willingness to be singly, doubly, and triply skeptical – they provide cover to our friends, who can easily say “But those people actually discuss FLAT EARTH on that site.”
Keeping this site easily but incorrectly discredited is part of our strategy.
We don’t want credit. We want the TRUTH to WIN. All we need is for the HIDDEN TRUTH to “get out”. People with greater credibility and reach need never mention us.
Anyway, our approach requires civility. You may disagree in a civil fashion.
Those who do not adhere to this minimal standard – this minimal but sadly requisite infringement of Free Speech – will be placed in moderation. This regrettable state will continue until we have such software that allows members to individually take responsibility for their own moderation.
In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”
We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).
We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.
If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.
We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.
In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”
A Moment of Prayer
Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.
Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.
You may even pray for our enemies, the Demonic Communist Democrats, as well, per the advice of the most popular rabbi around here. Letting them know about antihistamines for COVID is one of my new strategies. Feel free to save a few Democrat lives with generic loratadine, or brand names if they insist.
MUSICAL INTERLUDE
For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, brought up in nets from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.
It’s still Christmas, as far as I’m concerned. Doubts about the actual birthday of Christ are a perfect excuse to keep Christmas going until spring, whether the doubts are founded or unfounded.
Christ is opportunity!
OK – let’s try ANOTHER country Christmas song with a little more TOE-TAPPIN’ for y’all.
And while we remember that great Patty Loveless and friends singing about the amazing faith of Daniel of the Bible……
…..let’s enjoy another trio effort with a more Christian-era spin on forgiveness, and a timeless spin on sin.
Call To Battle
Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.
Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.
We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.
Joe Biden didn’t win.
And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.
“WE HAVE LIFT-OFF!”
Featured Story – Didier Raoult
Didier Raoult, who was critical in getting antiviral therapeutics for SARS-CoV-2 launched with hydroxychloroquine, has not been sleeping.
The FAIL MEDIA has apparently been ignoring critical work that Raoult has been part of, including a very powerful paper which shows that SARS-CoV-2 moves in and out of animal populations, where it can mutate and gain function.
The reasoning presented in the paper is really convincing.
Here are two links to this critical and fairly understandable paper.
Emergence and outcomes of the SARS-CoV-2 ‘Marseille-4’ variant
To show you how much of a CHAMP this guy Raoult is, just check out this “update” paragraph added after acceptance for publication.
Since the final acceptance of this article, the sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 genome obtained from a farm mink sampled the 15th of November, 2020 in Eure-et-Loire was eventually released the 29th of March, 2021 (EPI_ISL_1392906). As we suspected and stated in the present article, this genome is strictly identical to the genome of a Marseille-4 variant confirming our hypothesis of a common source of this variant between French minks and humans.
The “gain of function” of the variant was increased hypoxia. This is the OPPOSITE of what we see with Omicron, which spreads faster with reduced hospitalization.
Did China use minks, ferrets, or similar animals to make Original Wuhan more deadly? SHAME!!!
BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR.
Raoult and his buddies looked at the bigger spread of variants as part of the “waves” of disease.
THIS amazing article by Raoult and his French buddies shows why CONTROLLED BORDERS are one of the best ways to stop the disease, by stopping the spread of variants.
Yeah, you’re not gonna hear THAT on Fake News.
Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants from 24,181 patients exemplifies the role of globalisation and zoonosis in pandemics
Geek out on the ABSTRACT, or go straight to the HIGHLIGHTS for the WOW signal!
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 the virus responsible for the current pandemic. This virus is continually evolving, adapting to both innate and acquired immune responses and therapeutic drugs. Therefore, it is important to understand how the virus evolving to design the appropriate therapeutic and vaccine in preparation for future variants. Here, we used the online SARS-CoV-2 databases, Nextstrain and Ourworld, to map the evolution and epidemiology of the virus. We identified 30 high entropy residues which underwent a progressive evolution to arrive at the current dominant variant – Delta variant. The virus underwent mutational waves with the first wave made up of structural proteins important in its infectivity and the second wave made up of the ORFs important for its contagion. The most important driver of the second wave is ORF8 mutations at residue 119 and 120. Further mutations of these two residues are creating new clades that are offshoots from the Delta backbone. More importantly the further expansion of the S protein in the Omicron variant is now followed with the acquisition of ORF8 mutations 119 and 120. These findings demonstrate how SARS-CoV-2 mutates and points to two evolutionary paths; 1) Mutational expansion on the Delta backbone among the ORFs and 2) Mutational expansion of the S protein on other backbone follow with mutational wave among the ORFs. Both are happening at the same time right now with the Omicron variant early in the first wave to follow with a more aggressive second wave of mutations.
HIGHLIGHTS Mutational waves in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2. S protein as the driver of the first wave improving the minimum inhaled viral load required to cause infection and ORF8 mutations 119 and 120 as the driver of the second mutational wave to improve the Contagion Airborne Transmission value.
Wolf here – so it clearly “wants” to be “more airborne”. Did masks help to create mask-bypassing, more airborne variants, in the same way that vaccines helped it generate vaccine-bypassing variants?
Fascinating fact from this paper – the original Wuhan strain was GONE by June of 2020.
Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:
cladogenesis
noun
The formation of a new group of organisms or higher taxon by evolutionary divergence from an ancestral form.
An evolutionary splitting of a parent species into two or more distinct species, forming a clade.
Used in a sentence, a paragraph, and an analogy:
“Scientists of evolution use the term ‘cladogenesis’ to describe the division of an existing species into multiple lines–thus creating new species–often in response to radical change in the environment,” explained Dick Patton, global marketing officer at EgonZehnder, in an Ad Age article. “Marketing appears to be going through a process much like this, right before our eyes. The 21st-century CMO faces an explosively expanding range of options from which to branch out in new directions.”
Used in a picture:
Look closely, with TIME on the X axis, to see the DELTA and OMICRON waves.
With a blend of humor and seriousness, like any good bar, we celebrate this grand re-opening of WOLF’S PUB on Christmas Eve, December 24, 2021, by actually opening near closing time on Christmas Eve Eve, but what the heck.
IT’S ALMOST CHRISTMAS.
While our beloved bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we will ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.
I will admit right off the cricket bat that this here substitute bartender doesn’t know jack shit about alcohol compared to our regular one, so he’s going to have to substitute some rather wild and crazy concoctions for the drinks, seeing as he does have some experience with ALCOHOLS OF THE WRONG KIND.
And while we’re at it, THANK GOD FOR INDIA, and another alcohol with medicinal applications!!!
Washington : Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hugs President Donald Trump as Modi departs the White House, Monday, June 26, 2017, in Washington. AP/PTI(AP6_27_2017_000035B)
Truthfully, some of the best ideas in science are to be found at local pubs, when the research groups go out and have enough beer and wine to begin saying what they REALLY think about this or that.
So WHO KNOWS what fascinating things might be said in Wolf’s Pub on a Thursday or Friday night?
But first, let’s get the RED TAPE out of the way.
VERBATIM, from the regular bartender.
HOUSE RULES
God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.
Now, back to business.
AMEN!
And TGIF!
And thus a moment of thanks to ALL our contributors, current, past, and future!
H/T DP for this one!
Current Art On The Wall
Every bar needs some art on the wall, and seeing that we’re a virtual bar with access to millions of digital counterfeit prints, you may find more than just “Dogs Playing Poker”. That said…..
A Late Nod To Hanukkah
I totally missed Hanukkah this year. I was planning on doing a post, but this year, Hanukkah fell PRECISELY during my bout with Delta, and my quarantine period afterwards, and I just blew it off.
Well, better late than never.
Indeed, I think it’s pretty cool that I was “counting the days” during my illness – with Hanukkah falling on “Day 2” – the height of my illness – and finishing on “Day 9” – completely recovered and feeling great.
I love these pictures of President Trump and FLOTUS Melania – she really looked happy at this White House Hanukkah celebration.
Nothing can take away the FOUR GREAT YEARS of the Trump Presidency. Nothing. They will live forever. And for some weird reason, the story of Hanukkah reminds me of the story of the Trump Presidency.
And THAT story is not over yet!
Vaccine Stuff
This is just an image! Don’t click it!
If you have not seen the video of President Trump with Candace Owens, then give SUNDANCE a click (below) and watch the video over there. Hat Tip to WSB for alerting me to this great video. She also has a comment over there, and HERE, too. Be sure to watch to the end! You won’t regret it.
This week has seen quite a bit of WTF, one might say, with “Dear Leader” “Chidin’ Biden” wagging his Bill Clinton FINGER OF NO SLEEPY NO CREEPY at the unwashed unvaxxed, but we’ve got better things to do, than to listen to that lying old coot.
Go sniff somebody else’s hair, Fake President! #FJB!!!
How about, instead, I drink a bit too much ginger ale, and tell you all how I believe Bill Gates sabotaged hydroxychloroquine? With the aid of some people who we all know VERY well? Have a seat! It’s quite a story.
How (IMO) Bill Gates Sabotaged HCQ
You all are the first to hear this story.
Let’s start off by listening to two Steves – Bannon and Hatfill – talking REALITY about OMICRON.
The “traveling vaccine”, as Dr. Hatfill calls it. This is short – 4 minutes.
So this guy understands the DUPLICITY – the SABOTAGE – the DECEIT – that actually goes on in science.
That duplicity is well-represented by the recent guilty verdicts against the former Chairman of the Harvard chemistry department, Dr. Charles Lieber. You know – that guy who was helping the ChiComs with their “Thousand Talents [OF SILVER] Program”, and hiding his take from the feds.
NEW: Harvard professor Charles Lieber was just found guilty on all 6 charges related to lying to the FBI & concealing his lucrative ties to CCP’s Thousand Talents Program & Wuhan University of Technology while receiving millions in funding from NIH & DOD.https://t.co/EfyxXzv0gp
The thing is, I discovered even MORE about how HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE was knifed in the back by the enemies of truth.
Do you all remember that GREAT video on Vitamin D in preventing COVID-19?
Well, this Doc, Roger Seheult, has ANOTHER video that I was looking at, where he talks about the vaccines. And you have to be wondering “GREAT! Is he PRO or ANTI vaccine?”
I would say that he’s definitely PRO-VAX, but not BLINDLY so. More like – the vaccine is a tool, and he’s gonna use it. He treats patients – they’re young and dying – he’s very emotional – he wants to save them – and he believes the vaccine helps. So he tells people – get the vaccine.
He’s also marginally supportive of research on ivermectin, but he’s NOT gonna buck the system by advocating current use. He does NOT seem to have very much discernment about DECEIT and CORRUPTION in science, IMO. He’s a bit of an innocent, or even a chump, just like most people in science, who think the whole thing is a zone of trust, relatively free of deception and trickery.
Here is the video.
This is actually really good stuff, but if you’re looking for ammo against vaccines, this is not it. This is more like a “good doctor” trying to convince you – with mostly good data – but in some places weak data – to take the vaccine.
I can almost see it. ALMOST. But not quite. Not for me, certainly. My “medical advisor” who says “what in the HELL happened to contraindications and the VERBOTEN status of vaccination during pregnancy?” says “NO”.
HOWEVER, if you’re looking for where the pro-vax side is WEAK and DEFENSIVE, this is also a great video. You can see where they’re in trouble, and where they’re avoiding things, and where they’re grasping at straws. It’s very edgy scientific detective work, but I read these people pretty well.
More on THAT stuff in a full post to come.
This dude doesn’t want to lose his channel. Bottom line. But you can read past some of what is said.
So first, BEFORE we get to the BIG CRIME, a small sidebar.
Sidebar: Dr. Geert is Right Again
There is a slide in Doc Rogers’ video that PROVES ONE MORE TIME that Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche is TOTALLY RIGHT.
Dr. Roger is showing this to us, to emphasize that younger and younger people are being hospitalized with COVID now – that pediatric cases are increasing, as Delta is taking over. This is part of why the DOCTORS are pushing to vaccinate kids. They’re getting more and more young adult, teen and pediatric cases in the hospitals. It’s an emotional strain on them to watch young people die.
But there is a problem.
MASS VACCINATION ITSELF IS CAUSING THIS PHENOMENON.
This is EXACTLY what Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche has been warning about. EXACTLY.
People have got to start listening to this dude.
Bill Gates’ CEO, who is advising Joe Biden, was an adjunct professor of epidemiology. Surely she can understand Geert. But she’s also on Pfizer’s board. That’s a problem. A real conflict of interest. Geert is an epidemiologist, and he is predicting all this stuff like clockwork. Maybe she should take a listen.
BUT – back to the story…..
Of the ASSHOLES who are pushing vaccination…..
By INTERFERING with science…..
By UNDERMINING science at the most basic levels.
So you see by that example – the slide of hospital age groups – what is so great about these sorts of videos is that these docs and experts will pop out the convincer graphs and references, and you can either screen capture like above, or GO TO THE SOURCE.
OR go somewhere ELSE they don’t want you to look.
So LATER in this Dr. Roger video, immediately after a rather prog-chauvinistic, hand-waving excuse why certain positive foreign studies of ivermectin should be dismissed (pure Fauci shade-throwing – go to 1:22:30), he mentions some American study – which was NOT LancetGate – that he says disproved hydroxychloroquine.
He just throws that in as an aside – but that’s BULLSHIT.
HCQ isn’t GREAT, but it works when given very early, it has saved MANY lives, and there is simply no doubt about it, at this point. So the good doctor is LOSING credibility with me right there. He’s following close, but he’s not following close enough, because he’s clearly trusting NIH, CDC, and Fauci.
He’s a chump – and he can be fooled by flowing along with the similarly chumped mainstream of science. He’s inside the big deceit – he has no reference frame.
So what IS this study that “disproved” HCQ? Screenshot:
This thing was called the “Together COVID Trial”. And it’s still out there.
These ad hoc COVID trials have been taking place in CANADA and BRAZIL – both of which make Suspicious Cat *immediately* purr “serious communist problems in both places” – and if you recall that French communist, Agnes Buzyn, who very stealthily took HCQ out of OTC status in France, you understand that this is significant.
Union communists and other embeds make GREAT footsoldiers. They’ve infiltrated medicine – they’ve infiltrated science – they’ve infiltrated universities, and hospitals – and they do the dirty jobs, where a spy would otherwise be required. My first exposure was in a university scandal, and that was just the beginning. I’ve had to deal with top-shelf university science commies on this very site. They tried to pull a really fast one on us, back at the beginning of COVID. They are dead serious in this big attempt to install WORLD COMMUNISM.
ANYWAY – back to the story.
At THAT point, I remembered something Bill Gates said on TV – the ONLY time he mentioned hydroxychloroquine. He said that “WE” would have to do studies on it.
As soon as I heard that, I rolled my eyes. Oh, yeah. FOX in the freakin’ hen-house.
“We have to STUDY the chickens.”
What a joke.
I have always felt that Gates was behind Surgisphere and LancetGate, the biggest hit job EVER on hydroxychloroquine, which was retracted, but I have yet to find evidence of his involvement – and I have looked several times.
HOWEVER, it turns out that Gates WAS behind the studies of hydroxychloroquine that killed people by overdoses, while giving it too late to save them.
Yeah. That’s convenient. That combination of two crucial errors is diagnostic for a very professional scientific kill job, BTW. When you REALLY want it dead, wooden cross and silver bullet. A scientific double-tap.
See? You learn something every day.
So I’m thinking – well, maybe GATES is behind THESE STUDIES.
So then I go looking to see who is behind them, and this is what I see.
AH! So who’s that?
I went after “Rainwater” first, because I was thinking “Oh, yeah, baby – this sounds like the Tides Foundation” – that being the “charity” by which John Kerry and his rich wife send all kinds of seed money to left-wing operations.
But I check it out, and it’s just some Texan good old boy named Rainwater who left his fortune as a foundation, and at worst, the money got pointed to help Gates by some lefty kid or nephew. More likely an alumnus story or something like that.
The way this org is set up, the people who choose the grant proposals get a gazillion begs, from which the operation can pick and choose. And there is nothing that can prevent a secret reach-around where the choosers or their puppets can SEND THEIR OWN PUPPET PROPOSALS INTO THE SCAM.
See how that works? Very slick.
So who funds the begs?
The grants are currently supported by: Arnold Ventures, The Audacious Project, The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, John Collison, Patrick Collison, Crankstart, Jack Dorsey, Kim and Scott Farquhar, Paul Graham, Reid Hoffman, Fiona McKean and Tobias Lütke, Yuri and Julia Milner, Elon Musk, Chris and Crystal Sacca, Schmidt Futures, and others. AWS has contributed compute credits.
OK. This is so easy, I’m gonna leave some of these names for everybody else. But this thing is so full of “usual suspects”, it should be a movie.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative is Facebook, which incidentally had – until right after COVID was released – a BOARD MEMBER and DIRECTOR who happened to be the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation – a lady named Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellman – who recently joined the board of Pfizer – and is also now one of Joe Biden’s presidential science advisers. I mentioned her above.
Hellman was appointed to the social media platform’s board in March 2013 and served as it Lead Independent Director from June 2015 until October 30th 2019, shortly before the first reported case of COVID-19.
Is the Directed Evolution of Variants – Something Deeply Understandable to Joe Biden’s Science Advisors – Being Abused by the Corporate-Government-Academic Axis? Yeah, you remember that one! Several hat tips to Sundance on this one, too. It’s now becoming very clear that the mercenary Bill Gates getting involved with healthcare was one of the LAST …
So we have BILL GATES linked to, and MARK ZUCKERBERG and his CHICOM WIFEY funding, a study that tried to take down HCQ, and certainly seems to have influenced a lot of doctors against it.
SMART. Influence the docs, but do it quietly and behind the scenes – so there’s not so much outrage stirred up like LancetGate, which outraged the scientific community, and caused those two journal editors to squawk excuses in the “leaked” telephone conversation.
Less visibility, but more long-term effect. I really think this is why a lot of doctors “gave up” on hydroxy.
BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR.
Who else is behind Fast Grants?
CHOOMER RASPUTIN – a.k.a. Jack Dorsey, of Twitter.
It’s a small world at the top of the COUP, ain’t it?
BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR.
Who’s the last person on that list? It’s not who you think.
“AWS has contributed compute credits.”
AWS is Amazon Web Services. That’s the CIA. So THEY’RE handling the computers in some way. They likely had INSIGHT into all the trials.
Does this all make sense now?
Good.
Now – I have not looked at this paper yet, which knifed HCQ in the back – nor have I looked at one of the Together Trial studies of ivermectin which they also did, which found no utility.
I’m sure I will look at these papers at some point, but I’m lazy, and it’s late, and my wife wants me to go to bed.
But with these tips, I’m certain that some intrepid HONEST scientists out there will now find obvious problems with the studies. Because they’re gonna be there, trust me.
This is the state of science. It is extraordinarily manipulable. And one of the BEST ways to manipulate it, is to FUND IT, and then have access and control that is hidden from the public.
That’s life in the big city.
Bottom line – I think this is one piece of the puzzle of how hydroxychloroquine was taken down. MULTIPLE HITS by Bill Gates. The man was NOT taking any chances.
Christmas Eve
I could let this post end with a story of science corruption, but that’s not how things end. That’s never how things end.
You see – there was this guy named Jesus, and he was all about bringing GOD (or G_D, if you prefer) to the low-lifes. The tax collectors. The prostitutes. The immigrants. The wise guys. People like me. People like the people I understand. People like us. People like all of us.
There are a lot of things I could talk about, relating to the Kingdom of Heaven, and how it’s a lot closer than people realize, but what’s funny about THAT, is that it’s a lot like some of the things we run into here, in our efforts to shine the light of Truth on things.
The small stuff is easy to write off, and the big stuff is protected by unbelievability.
But nevertheless, I won’t give up, trying to get others to see the beauty of it all.
That the big party really is there.
That we’re all invited.
And that it really is ALL THAT AND A BAG OF CHIPS.
I don’t approach Christianity like most people. I use the Bible to try to understand the nature of reality. I try to understand what Christ was telling us at a weird and deep level, because I’ve found that his “thought experiments”, if you will, were always consistent on many levels of interpretation, and they help me to see – with more beauty and less words – what he meant.
I trust now for different reasons than I trusted before, but I still trust.
Anyway, Christmas is a time to reflect on Christ. And interestingly, this year, it’s really working for me.
I hope I can help you to do the same!
Merry Christmas, friends and neighbors. Posters and lurkers. Believers and skeptics. Allies and enemies.
There’s room for you all at a certain place in this town. Or very close by.
After a lost week of human self-experimentation to survive multiply mutated Fauci-Baric China Virus, Wolf has obtained answers to a thousand questions. Here are just a few of those answers.
Over the last week, overcoming my SECOND case of the China virus, I have been able to learn quite a bit about the enemy’s weaponry – AND our own.
I was READY this time. PREPARATION paid off, and big-league.
I tried to help others prepare, and ended up helping myself, too.
OK, people. It is time for THE WOLF to GET PATTON ON YOUR ASSES. As you may know, we now have many of our dear members actively fighting COVID-19, including one (gil00) in the hospital. Several have received Regeneron. Thus far, praise God, we have not lost anybody – and I intend to keep it …
I felt it was important to share what I have learned, and to answer people’s questions, but I wanted to have enough strength to actually do a post – not just a few quick answers lost in the middle of conversations.
I have answered a few questions already – I will try to link to some of those answers. Other answers I may copy here. But most of these questions are being answered here for the first time.
HERE WE GO!
1. Which version of COVID-19 did I have?
singingsoul1(@singingsoul1) Online Wolverine Reply to Wolf Moon December 3, 2021 19:46
Wolf is that [omicron] the strain you and your wife caught? I am wondering since you did not respond as well to Ivermectin?
Where did you catch the first virus covid and where do you think you caught the second virus? You caught two different strains?
What I had this time was almost certainly Delta.
What I had the first time was almost certainly a minor variant of the original Wuhan strain (COVID-19).
Here is the current worldwide geographic distribution according to NextStrain.
Note that the colors are not fixed – the same data may be shown with different colors from one day to the next.
The turquoise color which covers 2/3 to 3/4 of almost every pie chart across the planet is the Delta variant. You can see that it has rapidly become the predominant version.
The various grayish versions (1/4 to 1/3 of each pie) are basically the original Wuhan strains PLUS the gazillion minor morphs of THAT which formed immediately. You remember the “European strain” and the “Washington strain”, and the “New York”, “Italian”, etc. – those were all still basically Wuhan, and those are the variants that are still effectively treated by all the original vaccines and antibodies.
If things had stayed there, the vaccinated would largely not be having breakthrough cases right now. Similarly, I would not have had a “breakthrough case” on my natural immunity.
The purplish and orange versions are other minor variants of concern, some of which were once much bigger concerns, until delta began to predominate. The vaccines still held up fairly well against those, as did, apparently, my natural immunity.
Omicron (red) is barely on the map right now.
It is EXTREMELY unlikely that I had omicron. It is VERY likely that I had standard issue delta variant.
2. How do I know that I had COVID-19?
Within a 24 hour period, I was positive to three tests – TWO antigen tests (BinaxNOW and QuickVue), plus a PCR test run by my primary care physician’s group.
The same tests showed my wife to be negative on Day Zero and Day One of my infection.
However, LATER, on Day 4 of my case, another run of QuickVue showed my wife to be weakly positive.
In my opinion, and with as much experience as I have now, running them, these antigen tests are highly reliable and trustworthy.
But that’s just the beginning.
My new case was, in so many ways, almost identical to the case that I had in January 2020. That case predated the availability of tests. Also, because it predated antibody test availability, I never got an antibody test until 6 months later – which by then was negative.
But now I’m CERTAIN. I had COVID the first time. Same damn disease. THE SAME.
And it all makes sense. DELTA BREAKTHROUGH IS possible for Wuhan natural immunity, IMO. Maybe not for everybody, but it was for me.
3. Did ivermectin work for me?
I strongly suspect that ivermectin helped me avoid serious problems and recover quickly.
I cannot be sure that ivermectin actually helped, but it certainly didn’t hurt. I would be very tempted to use ivermectin again, if I got COVID again.
My wife also used ivermectin, and it seemed to “flatten the curve” of viral load for her, too.
I would be bullshitting to say that I know ivermectin helped, or that my case “proves that it works.” But I can easily say that I strongly suspect that it helped.
4. Did I have any side effects from ivermectin?
Yes, but the side effects were extremely minor, for as massively high of a dose as I was taking.
I decided to roughly follow the FLCCC “triple-dose” (0.6 mg/kg) recommendation for an active infection, because I had two of the conditions that cause FLCCC to recommend the highest dose – (1) likelihood of delta strain, and (2) multiple comorbidities.
I decided that the same applied to my wife.
To mitigate side effects, I did NOT take the daily amount in a single dose, but rather spread it out in 12-mg pill-pops during the day. But even with the spreading of the doses, and taking them with meals, I felt the following symptoms.
desire to sleep after meals
“lazy eye focus” for a few hours
stomach “not quite right”
None of this was bad enough to quit the drug, or even to reduce the dose, but after 5 days of it, I was absolutely done. I had ZERO desire to take ivermectin any more. I wanted my stomach to return to normal, even if that entailed a greater risk. Given that most of my other symptoms were gone, I didn’t feel like it was much of a risk.
Also, ivermectin has a pretty long half-life, so after 5 days of super-high-dosing it, I’m probably STILL flushing it out of my system.
My wife experienced the same stomach issues. She was ready to give it up after 6 days.
5. What about the Zelenko / Raoult protocols?
Yes. I credit azithromycin every bit as much as ivermectin, and I have more direct evidence that it helped me.
This is where the reasoning gets very complicated.
In early 2020, I was immediately impressed by the work of Didier Raoult (hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin) and later by the clinical real-world proof of Zev Zelenko (added zinc and moved treatment to outpatient prophylaxis). I was absolutely convinced that early azithromycin was key to stopping the killer pulmonary symptoms of the disease, and basically turned it into “just another weak, influenza-like coronavirus”.
Although it turns out that azithromycin has its own powerful antiviral activities, the main thing it did, in my opinion then and now, was to prevent any type of pneumonia from setting in. This is critical if you want to stay out of the hospital.
Thus, as soon as I started detecting what I considered scary lung issues (burning lungs, basically), which was almost immediately (end of day zero, middle of day one), I decided to begin TWO ADDITIONAL PROTOCOLS.
The first was a modified Zelenko protocol. I increased my zinc to my maximum levels ever taken, plus quercetin as natural capers (clearly the bad influence of Aubergine). My wife and I also began using elderberry syrup as an additional zinc ionophore.
However, the real key was adding azithromycin – 2 days at 500 mg, and 2 days at 250 mg. The very first dose resulted in an immediate improvement in my lungs.
There is simply no arguing against the clinical record of success of the Zelenko protocol. I trusted it in my scientific reasoning in 2020, and I trusted it to treat myself.
I get far more mileage out of real-world clinical studies like Raoult’s and Zelenko’s, than out of Fauci’s little “double-blind” – whoops – I mean “double-chump” scam studies that can be manipulated against both doctor and patient by lying, phony, deceptive, agenda-filled, biased, compromised, fake-neutral parties.
The whole idea of double-blind studies falls apart when the researchers and patients are innocent DUPES and CHUMPS, and the people who are supposed to be honest referees in charge of neutrality are in fact dishonest manipulators like NIH, CDC, CEPI, Gates, WHO, and all the rest.
In contrast, studies like Zelenko’s and Raoult’s are pretty much open source. No Fauci-type con-man is in charge of fake neutrality. This being a neutrality I have little care for anyway, because I don’t care what exactly saved the people – simply that they were saved.
Yeah – I’m biased in favor of MEDICINE ITSELF.
The protocol works, end of story.
Fauci’s “studied ignorance” of clinical success is exactly why the man should have been fired DECADES AGO. He’s not a doctor – not a patient-treating one – and he should not be in charge of doctors.
HOWEVER – I do have to admit – azithromycin was even harder on my gut than ivermectin. Four days was all I could take. My stomach was always double-queasy if I took AZM with my IVM. There was NO WAY I was going to do a fifth day.
But YES – the stuff worked, and IMO kept my lungs “infection-free”, knock on wood.
Thank you, Doctors Raoult and Zelenko!!!
6. What about antihistamines?
Absolutely. The same well-proven clinical success that Zelenko had with azithromycin, was also evident in the results from the Spanish nursing homes. It would have been negligent not to take an antihistamine, in my opinion.
That, plus some additional reasoning I will explain below.
Based on the recommendations of people here, I chose Claritin (loratadine), and quickly found that I tolerated it easily at the recommended double doses.
I experienced a very, very slight dryness of the mouth, but that’s it. Just to be careful, I tended to keep the dosing closer to 1.5 instead of double, but in the absence of all the other drugs I was taking, I would have been more rigorous about the double dose, without consequence.
For those who need a refresher on the use of antihistamines against COVID…..
Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …
Now – here is some important new reasoning I had.
In the FLCCC protocols, and the Zelenko protocols, there is very little if any “over-the-counter” patient control in terms of things which could possibly pre-address and prevent the “cytokine storm” problem – particularly any drug that is available on an outpatient, OTC basis.
In the FLCCC protocols, aspirin is the main anti-clotting drug with something approaching that function. In the original Raoult and Zelenko protocols, HCQ’s antirheumatic functions combined with azithromycin’s actions seemed to suppress pulmonary capillary clotting, although neither did so as well as steroids.
The fact is, however, that the Spanish nursing home study had extremely good success preventing cytokine storms by simply using antihistamines on ALL patients, both as treatment and as prophylaxis. The entire emphasis of the approach was not so much to prevent disease, as to simply limit the disease.
To me it was a no-brainer to add an antihistamine to prevent inflammatory clotting – something that I knew already I was susceptible to, because of my first case of COVID, after which I lost lung function.
Loratadine turned out to be a VERY high-bang-for-buck fix for me, because it also dried nasal and sinus secretions, helped my breathing, reduced lung congestion, and generally decreased symptoms.
Thus, I found that adding an antihistamine had both clearly observable short-term benefits, and very likely long-term benefits.
I highly recommend adding this protocol during COVID treatment. It’s completely OTC as well – the Medical Mafia in Washington simply can’t stop it.
Multiple studies have showed that aspirin, even at low doses, is both protective against getting COVID-19 and also protective against hospitalization and death. The numbers are substantial, too.
This is, again, part of the FLCCC protocol, and pretty much a no-brainer.
I started off using half a regular aspirin, but quickly found that it was just one more drug beating on my stomach.
Switching to low-dose aspirin worked nicely to make any stomach symptoms go away. I also found that I did not need more than 1 or 2 low-dose baby aspirins to control fever. I was able to routinely drop my fever back to near-normal with either 81 mg or 162 mg of aspirin.
Now, my doctor’s practice recommended acetominophen in case I had a high fever, but I never came close to needing it. As it was, I did not want to risk my liver in ANY WAY with all the other high drug doses, so there was NO WAY I was going to add dangerous acetominophen to the mix.
According to the literature studies, even a single baby aspirin per day was enough to show the protective effect. Thus, I made sure to always take 81-325 mg aspirin per day, and will continue with at least 81 mg/day for some time to be determined.
8. What about HCQ?
Not this time, but I would not rule it out in the future – particularly in the absence of ivermectin.
When I got my ivermectin, I had the opportunity to get hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as well. I chose the latter, but decided not to bother with HCQ I would likely not use.
I let ivermectin be my “drug of choice” for fighting COVID, for many reasons, including the greater safety profile and better understanding by doctors’ groups, including FLCCC. I am satisfied that I made the right choice in ivermectin, but quite frankly, it would have been a good thing to have some HCQ on hand as well.
Anything that kills viruses, is better than their “stupidity of spike identity” vaccine.
9. Did I gargle?
Yes. I used FLCCC-recommended and study-backed Listerine “with essential oils”, and the benefits were obvious.
Actually, ALL the Listerine variations use the same “essential oils” – pick any of them. Some of the time, I used one that also packs zinc chloride, to really screw with the virus.
At first, I went with warm saturated sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) gargle, which was the gargle used by the Spanish nursing homes.
Warm bicarb is actually a really good solution, in terms of soothing the throat and decreasing viral load (as experienced through reduction of key symptoms), but it doesn’t really do a lot in terms of opening up breathing passages.
In contrast, Listerine gargle was EXCELLENT for helping to clear breathing passages, AND to decrease viral load in the throat and mouth. The beneficial effects even extended to the lungs. I only needed to do it 2 or 3 times a day, and the effects lasted for hours afterwards.
The Listerine gargle was also excellent before sleeping, to have a peaceful night’s rest, with clear breathing.
In my opinion, the gargling protocol is really key to helping end things quickly.
NOW – there is some difference between what I experienced and what FLCCC recommends. FLCCC only recommends (at the moment) Listerine for prevention – they DROP IT for early treatment, and recommend ONLY the other types of antiseptics (cetylpyridinium, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine) once you get the disease. Yet, honestly, I was totally satisfied with the performance of Listerine for TREATMENT, and would not hesitate to use it again.
This may be an individual thing. As they say, your mileage may vary.
10. What about povidone-iodine gargle?
I didn’t use it this time, but I may very well try it next time!
I was not aware that you can just buy this stuff OTC, but yeah – it’s a product. In the studies I read, povidone-iodine was THE BEST in lowering viral load in patients. It did better than Listerine – not by a whole lot, but enough that it might be worth it.
So if you can’t stand Listerine of any kind, or Scope, or whatever – consider trying this one.
11. Did I get the monoclonal antibodies?
Yes. In “better late than never” fashion, I got the mAb infusion after the treatment with ivermectin and azithromycin was already finished, and my fever was gone.
I was fever-free when I got the antibodies, and fever free when I left the infusion center. Shortly after that, I became exhausted and had a fever again. In another 24 hours, my strength was back and the fever was gone yet again.
Basically, I was treating Delta with more Wuhan antibodies like my own, which had already only provided some protection.
I cannot really be sure if the antibodies helped. I personally found that they knocked me out, increased my fever, and made me suffer a “day of exhaustion” that I had otherwise MISSED thanks to ivermectin.
Were they beneficial? Possibly, but I can’t be certain.
My wife got the antibodies somewhat earlier in the progress of the disease, because she got them at the same time I did, but her case was tracking mine LATE by roughly four days.
The antibodies didn’t completely finish her case, but she really only had one more day of disease after the “antibody down day”.
I would say that antibody infusion was far more likely to have helped HER than it was to have helped ME.
If I had to choose between antibodies, aspirin, loratadine, azithromycin, and ivermectin, I’m not actually sure which one I would toss. I consider EACH of them, just one more tool to make sure the disease stays contained. Use as many as you can get.
12. So what happened to my “natural immunity”?
Try some “AND” logic.
It’s still there – waiting patiently for a disease that no longer exists.
This blurry snapshot from NextStrain is from a “play mode” view of the data, where you can watch the genetic data being added in accelerated time. I have focused the active band on early 2020. The “19” and “20” strains are pre-delta – they were well within the window of my natural immunity, which was probably generated by a strain within what they are now calling 19A.
Follow the evolution forward in time, and you can see the massive shift to delta versions, shown in turquoise and indigo below.
SO – what I have now is DOUBLE natural immunity to TWO HUGE CHUNKS of older/existing COVID-19/20/21/22, the now-rare “gray” stuff and the very common “blue-green” stuff.
You can see, though, where OMICRON in RED is now forming. Whether I have any, some, or no immunity to omicron is an open question. HOWEVER, I would much rather have combined natural immunity to TWO groups of COVID variants, than three, four, or even five vaccines.
We have to start being very scientific about immunity, including in particular natural immunity, which is IMO the BEST response to highly mutating diseases, just as it has ALWAYS been.
Fauci is gaslighting us. Ignore him.
Until the poisonous dwarf is removed from power, do your own science.
https://youtu.be/p_yOSM7ujM0
Start HERE:
This link in particular, to keep checking up on SARS-CoV-2 – an EVOLVING GROUP OF VIRUSES.
The murderous LancetGate Effect is back, and this time it killed thousands before bureaucrats relented and allowed doctors to save patients.
[ Hat Tip to barkerjim for alerting me to this Indonesian case. ]
Part 1 – LancetGate Effect 1.0 and 1.1
Ah, the memories of LancetGate! That moment when “they” “finally” “proved” that hydroxychloroquine didn’t work.
Until – it turned out – they had proved nothing. For when honest people looked at the bogus Surgisphere study, embarrassingly published in The Lancet, they realized that it was absolute horseshit, built on bad data, by people who had no idea what they were doing, other than trying to KILL hydroxychloroquine. Presumably on behalf of Mysterious Unknown Bill Gateses and Nations That Might Be China.
The trouble is, by the time the study was proven to be a bunch of happy horseshit, bureaucrats had eagerly and enthusiastically banned hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 in several countries, and tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of people worldwide were denied hydroxychloroquine, many of them dying within that typical 14-day window in which COVID-19 kills people.
However, something interesting happened when hydroxychloroquine was banned in Switzerland.
Because the bans of HCQ were all planned and coordinated around the release of the false study, they went into effect almost immediately, with relentless efficiency. It was in some cases immediately impossible for doctors to get hydroxychloroquine.
THAT created a sharpness in the curves.
Fourteen days later, the deaths from COVID-19 began spiking – HARD. Now, people were criticizing the study almost immediately, and within a few weeks, the study was already looking very shaky, as The Lancet started backing down, ultimately leading to retraction.
The Swiss didn’t wait that long to correct their error. They saw the deaths, allowed HCQ back into the hands of doctors, saving the lives of patients, again with GREAT SUDDENNESS, despite the “best wishes” of neo-Nazi KlauSS Schwab and the WEFFEN SS Great Resetters, who needed more dead people – even their own pitiful Davos plebes.
And THIS was the result.
It was a STUNNING little blip in the data.
The result was even more interesting when compared to France, where HCQ was immediately suppressed, thanks to communist bureaucrat Agnes Buzyn, who swiftly made the OTC drug almost unobtainable.
Allow me to explain these graphs.
France starts off worse than Switzerland due to suppression of hydroxychloroquine, and gets even worse as supplies dry up, while Switzerland gets better immediately, with doctors experimenting with treatments based on the earlier research and cutting-edge studies, including both chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine. A stunning indictment of post-Soviet bureaucracy.
So why does France start getting better (going down)? That is the result of research by Prof. Didier Raoult in Marseilles, in the South of France, who quickly got extremely positive results by semi-prophylactic “early treatment” of both the virus and subsequent pneumonia, using a combination of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZM), without waiting for positive test results for bacterial infection. This idea of prophylactic antibiotics is KEY to saving lives, and later influenced Dr. Zelenko in America to try a combination of HCQ, AZM, and zinc, given at the first sign of the disease, as an outpatient treatment. Zelenko gets wildly good results, preventing hospitalizations and deaths at nearly 100% level, yet is unable to get organizations like the AMA to acknowledge the treatment.
The problem for Prof. Raoult was that he was immediately vilified by the forces of Big Pharma. Some of it was absolutely stunning. Nevertheless, there was a strong group of “populist” doctors and scientists in France, and also internationally, who supported Raoult, even though the MONEY was clearly against him.
Nonetheless, Raoult was winning the hearts and minds of practitioners in France – particularly in the South of the country, and admirers around the world. And THAT is why the numbers kept getting better.
One of my favorite French memes…..
And then LANCETGATE happened, as you can see in the graph.
And then the LancetGate Effect, fully visible when LancetGate was exposed, and HCQ was allowed back into the physician’s arsenal of salvation.
France was already operating under a “ban” on hydroxychloroquine, and there was considerable pressure on Prof. Raoult, but it did not really get worse for him, or for other doctors using HCQ in spite of the ban, until a few weeks into the LancetGate Effect, where you can see a lesser effect than in Switzerland starting to happen in France, but an upward trend in deaths just the same. But the main point THERE is that the Swiss results ALMOST joined the French results.
Now, one of the confirmations of this was a SIMILAR effect in America.
The scale below is upside-down from above. In this case, UP is GOOD, DOWN is BAD.
Thanks to the WUWT weather and climate guys for finding this little nugget.
If you want to read more about these cases, please click on two old blog posts here which talk about the LancetGate Effect.
The first one talks about the effect itself.
The second involves a huge counteroffensive against all the people who had maligned hydroxychloroquine, in which Dr. Zelenko began collecting all the evidence, before it could be deleted.
This [Q-3]TH of AUGUST FRIDAY open thread is OPEN – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA / KAG! / KMAG world (KMAG being a bit of both MAGA and KAG!). You can say what you want, comment on what …
Things are happening faster than I expected. Check this out. We need to contribute to this effort. Please dig up EVERY LINK that you can find of anti-HCQ and post it here. Be sure to include a description, including WHO exactly is referenced, to save people time when they go through comments. Also, I highly …
You will notice in these old articles that Twitter has now BLOCKED all my tweet threads on the LancetGate Effect, by “suspending” my account. Someday Jack Dorsey will answer for this!
Part 2 – LancetGate Effect 2.0
The following information was nicely captured in TWO articles in The Gateway Pundit.
Note that time has passed between LancetGate Effects 1.0 and 2.0 – the drug of choice for treating COVID-19 is now IVERMECTIN – at high enough doses that it shows a pronounced ANTIVIRAL effect. Fortunately, the antiparasitic drug has such an incredibly high therapeutic margin, it actually has a usable secondary antiviral activity.
Who would have known? THAT is science – and science in service of humanity.
The graph that really explains things is this one.
Now I will immediately tell you that the labeling of the graph is “true but misleading”. It LOOKS like the graph is saying:
“They banned ivermectin on 06/12/21 and the number of cases took off. Then it was approved on 07/15/21 and it dropped again.”
That is NOT the case. That “Ivermectin banned” arrow could just as easily point at the whole line to the left of the July 15th arrow.
The REAL reason for the huge spike is the arrival of the DELTA VARIANT in Indonesia. That hit the previously isolated island country, and the cases took off. AT THAT TIME, ivermectin was still banned, because the Indonesian health ministry was following the advice of WHO, CDC, FDA, and the EU.
BIG MISTAKE.
Here is another look at the data.
You can see how deaths track cases in time. After ivermectin was approved and made widely available, due to the desperation of the authorities, no longer willing to listen to Western Bolshevik and Globalist media propaganda, both reported cases and deaths dropped like a rock.
This is not hard.
Namibia did the same thing, and got great results.
What education are you talking about. In Namibia, Africa we used ivermectin in my hometown. Cases dropped like a rock, same as in india and indonesia. It's clear who the ignorant one is. For god's sake you hold a Phd, act like it!
People in America were simply not prepared to see just how mercenary Big Pharma really is, particularly now that it operates hand-in-glove with the Wokester Bolshevik and Globalist Scum. People in the “third world” are quite familiar with the concept, however. They know that they are barely even numbers to the elite globalists who run the planet – who operate with far more concern for imperial politics than for the people themselves.
Part 3 – Accountability
India has had its own experiences with ivermectin, and as far as India is concerned, ivermectin saved the day there, too.
A different state was not so lucky. They listened to the wrong woman, thereby dropping ivermectin for a while, and many people died.
The problem is, India has its own problem with UN-loving idiot wokesters who value globalist conformity over truth, and it resulted in THOUSANDS OF DEAD.
However, there is also accountability.
Although this has largely been covered up by the globalist media, Indian authorities have decided to prosecute their own “Fauci” for misleading the public on ivermectin, which led to thousands of people dying.
India charges WHO Scientist Soumya Swaminathan: India is a forefront nation in demanding accountability from the WHO, the Indian Bar Association (IBA) now suing WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan.
They are accusing her of causing the deaths of many Indian citizens by misleading them about the effect of Ivermectin, which she stated did not work against Covid-19.
As a result, the use of Ivermectin to cure Covid-19 was stopped and Covid cases exploded with deaths increasing ten-fold.
Point 56 states: “That your misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021, just a day after the Tamil Nadu government had indicated the same for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. (Feature photo: WHO Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan)
Specific charges included the running of a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin and issuing statements in social and mainstream media to wrongfully influence the public against the use of Ivermectin despite the existence of large amounts of clinical data showing its profound effectiveness in both prevention and treatment of COVID-19.
In particular, the Indian Bar brief referenced the peer-reviewed publications and evidence compiled by the ten-member Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) group and the 65-member British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel headed by WHO consultant and meta-analysis expert Dr. Tess Lawrie.”
Will Fauci, Walensky, and “Thalidomide Janet” Woodcock see justice?
NIH is sponsoring a new TRIAL of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
The latest chess move by NIH may be a move toward truth, or it could be more smoke and mirrors. However, I am telling you now – WE THE PEOPLE can force the play to yield TRUTH, if we keep our eyes on the ball.
In my opinion, we are FORCING – by the threat of NUREMBERG 2 – various government agencies to turn away from the Faucist false narratives they KNOW will do them as much good as “We were only following orders” helped the lower-level Nazis.
For example, the recent FDA 16-3 vote AGAINST sketchy, unproven, and very likely USELESS or actually counterproductive boosters – which the Faucists had to REVERSE by diktat of CDC’s Rochelle Alinsky – tells me that people in government who KNOW THE SCORE are starting to REBEL against “top-down” medicine, if only to save their own skins.
Yes, YouTube is holding the line for Comrade Alinsky, but others are starting to move away from the pounding gavels of NUREMBERG 2, sounding from just over the horizon of time.
Notice how FAKE NEWS can’t help but go after ivermectin, even reporting that NIH is giving it a trial.
YOU’RE A JOKE, FAKE NEWS!
Now – trust me – there are a thousand ways that people inside NIH, CDC, NIAID, or FDA could game the results of this study. I may talk about some of the other methods, but there is ONE in particular that was already used against hydroxychloroquine.
Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice, shame on US.
The way to insure a FAIL of any trial of an antiviral against COVID-19 is to give it too late. That includes “standard” antivirals like acyclovir, remdesivir, etc., AND it includes non-standard antivirals like hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin.
To validly test an antiviral, you have to give it early enough that it makes a difference. For a safe but highly nonstandard (and likely WEAKER) antiviral, “early enough” means VERY EARLY.
Dr. Zelenko recognized this IMMEDIATELY. That is why he jumped on very early outpatient hydroxychloroquine PLUS azithromycin (Raoult’s therapy, moved up in time) PLUS zinc, knowing that all three have a very HIGH margin of safety, so there is no need to wait – thus better to GET THE JUMP on both SARS-CoV-2 AND bacterial pneumonia, as well as any possible zinc deficiency.
Zelenko moved Raoult’s therapy to ALMOST prophylaxis, and removed the concern of zinc deficiency, common in the elderly.
It was SIMPLE, but it was BRAVE and GENIUS.
Now – LATER – there were COWARDLY attack studies, where hydroxychloroquine was administered too late, too much, and to dying patients, long after both antiviral and antirheumatic activities would do absolutely no good.
The scientific community called these studies out, but still – SHAME.
Will it happen again here?
Not if we can help it.
WHAT WE HAVE A CHANCE TO DO HERE, IS TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS STUDY OF IVERMECTIN CAN’T BE PURPOSELY FAILED BY LATE ADMINISTRATION.
The beauty of this study is that WE THE PEOPLE are the ones who “call in” when we get COVID. The earlier that is done, the more likely that ivermectin will PROVE its awesome ability to stop COVID in its tracks.
Thus, it is imperative that truth-seeking Deplorables (or libtards who are red-pilled enough to believe me) who are at risk for COVID-19, be READY to get into this study the MOMENT they are diagnosed.
And the easiest way to do THAT is to simply do the following:
Be familiar with the study
have the site bookmarked
have its phone number saved to your contacts
Have a COVID test on hand at home
Abbott BinaxNOW test is $25 for two (2) tests
antigen test is highly accurate, is NOT a PCR test
test takes 15 minutes and is very simple to perform
Use ALL OPTIONS to accelerate delivery of the treatments
Working together to help people with COVID-19 feel better faster. Call 833-385-1880 today!
The ACTIV-6 Study
The ACTIV-6 research study is testing several medications that are already approved for other diseases to see if they can help people with mild to moderate COVID-19 feel better faster and stay out of the hospital.
If you are 30 years old or older, have tested positive for COVID-19 within the past 10 days and have at least 2 COVID-19 symptoms for 7 days or less, you can help make a difference by participating in ACTIV-6.
You can participate from anywhere in the U.S. Medications are shipped to you at no cost. You will keep track of your symptoms and how you feel over 90 days.
Medications in the ACTIV-6 Study
ACTIV-6 is evaluating repurposed medications for effective, safe treatments for mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Repurposed medications are already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for other indications. The study is now testing these medications:
Fluticasone
an inhaled steroid commonly prescribed for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fluvoxamine
a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), often prescribed for depression
Ivermectin
used to treat parasitic infections
These medications can be shipped anywhere in the United States at no cost to participants.
Why This Study Is Important
Vaccines are available, but access is limited in some areas and new, more transmissible variants of the virus are emerging in the U.S. People are still getting sick, and many remain at risk for the disease.
Results from ACTIV-6 will help researchers understand how existing medications can improve symptoms and limit hospitalizations for people with mild to moderate COVID-19.
Study Eligibility
ACTIV-6 is for you if:
You are 30 years old or older
Tested positive for COVID-19 within the past 10 days
Have at least 2 COVID-19 symptoms for 7 days or less
Frequently Asked Questions
I am enrolled in ACTIV-6. How do I report a new health concern?
Click here to report a concern or medical event to our Call Center.
Does participation cost anything?
No, there is no cost to you to participate. All activities can be conducted on a private and secure website or over the phone.
Am I compensated for participating?
You may receive a gift card of up to $100 upon completion of the study.
Better treatments for COVID-19 are still needed, especially for patients with mild to moderate illness who are not hospitalized.
ACTIV-6 is part of a larger public-private partnership, Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV), announced in 2020 by the National Institutes of Health.
Enroll Today!
Fill out the screening form to have a study team member contact you, or call 833-385-1880 to speak with a study team member.
ACTIV-6 Study – Study Website – 29 – June – 2021 – English (Master) – V2.0
Now – I want to be absolutely clear about something – which is another way of saying that I want to rub FAKE SCIENCE’S NOSE in it’s own POOP.
We are not “gaming” this study by FORCING better science on establishment science. We are making sure that this is not a “gamed” study, by REMOVING the most likely (and proven) source of gaming the study to NOT SHOW A RESULT.
If the average starting time of therapy goes DOWN to where conclusive results are shown, that is GOOD DESIGN. That’s what we’re banking on here.
So – be sure to bookmark this sucker. If you get COVID, and this study (or a successor study) is running, you want to get into it.
And until there IS justice, we will drag the CRIMES of Anthony Fauci and Gilead “Pharmaceuticals” and their SLEAZY ASSOCIATES thorough the headlines, over and over, until people SPIT IN THEIR PATH as they walk down the streets.
So where do we begin?
Let’s take a brief look at ZYKLON D.
This is the molecule of remdesivir, a.k.a. Zyklon D (as in DEMOCRAT). This is the drug that is killing Americans – primarily “Deplorables”, in the hospital.
The shading of parts of the molecule is significant, and I’ll get to that in a future article. The shading is more significant in a NEW way, than it was in the original way.
If you remember NOTHING ELSE from this article, remember this.
Hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, and ivermectin TOGETHER over their entire histories have not killed as many people as remdesivir kills in a SINGLE DAY.
In fact, I’m sure it’s significantly less, but I leave the exact numbers as an exercise.
What’s really nasty there, is that OUR tax dollars are being used to PAY HOSPITALS to murder us with remdesivir. As long as hospitals use this WRONG drug at the WRONG TIME (which I will explain) to kill OLD TRUMP VOTERS, they get money from the federal government.
But if hospitals use the RIGHT drug at the RIGHT time, they don’t get the cash.
So what do HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATORS – who more and more are NOT DOCTORS – do? They do what you EXPECT them to do. They do NOT do the right thing for patients.
(H/T Gudthots and GAB)
This has been a part of the general phenomenon of the “lawyering of science”. Has it made science better?
I don’t think so.
It’s beyond evil, but hey – when you have a mafiosa in charge of not only the purse strings, but the “quiver”, these sorts of things happen.
Impeachahontas Now Wearing Two Diapers Nobody expected Chris Wray to play Mafia Nan’s queen of diapers face-up on January 6, but that is exactly what appears to have happened. The only question now is WHY. To quote a friend from a former life, “AYE-YI-YI!” OK – let me back up a bit. First, I want …
And then there’s the “medical mafia”.
Do you see Trump with his hands tied over there? He had to let that jackass on the left declare that a terrible drug recruited to MURDER old Republicans was “the new gold standard of care”, because the murderer is a member of “SES”, and can’t be fired. The medical mafioso can tell whatever lie he wants, and nobody can do anything about it.
Of course, maybe it IS the “GOLD STANDARD” for DEMOCRATS and HOSPITALS.
Yes, the EVIL in charge of this nation is fairly impressive. Moscow has NOTHING on Washington.
But back to the new “secret euthanasia drug”, remdesivir.
“When you go to a hospital, even if you don’t have COVID-19, you’d be construed that way,” says Renz during his program “Lawfare with Tom Renz” on Brighteon.TV. “They get hundreds of thousands of dollars for putting you on remdesivir, putting you on ventilator and letting you die. And if you don’t follow, they’ll just intimidate you and coerce you.”
His guest on the program, Nancy Ross, has experienced that firsthand. Ross has been given the power of attorney to act on behalf of Veronica Wolski, a known patriot from Chicago who recently died from COVID-19 at AMITA Health Resurrection Medical Center.
Ross says the hospital wanted to intubate Wolski and put her on ventilator, and the doctors kept telling that every time they see the patient. “They kept reminding her of that instead of talking about other possible treatment,” says Ross, referring to the ventilator. “I just couldn’t get it.” (Related: Overreliance on ventilators led to coronavirus deaths, study shows.)
According to Ross, Wolski had been asking the hospital to give her ivermectin but her requests had been repeatedly denied.
For the uninitiated, the only treatment for the disease approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) involves remdesivir. It is approved for use in adults and children at least 12 years old who weigh at least 88 pounds (40 kilograms).
Remdesivir is an antiviral medication that targets a range of viruses. It was originally developed over a decade ago to treat hepatitis C and a cold-like virus called respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Remdesivir is not an effective treatment for either disease, but it has shown promise against other viruses.
It works by interrupting the production of the virus. Coronaviruses have genomes made up of ribonucleic acid (RNA). Remdesivir interferes with one of the key enzymes the virus needs to replicate RNA, preventing the virus from multiplying.
However, up to 31 percent of patients who received remdesivir have developed multiple organ failure and/or acute kidney failure. “Remdesivir was pulled from clinical trials because it’s too dangerous. It’s just a disastrous drug,” says Renz.
Doctor admits 99 percent of intubated patients die
Renz also shares a message he has just received about a recording from a doctor admitting that 99 percent of the patients they intubate have ended up dying. “These are just bad treatments. They just kill people,” he says.
Many hospitals are also giving COVID-19 patients with midazolam, which is questionable at best as it depresses a person’s ability to breathe. It is most frequently used before surgeries or procedures to decrease anxiety, cause drowsiness, and help with anesthesia in patients who need tubes or machines to help them breathe.
Midazolam has an FDA black box warning, which notes that the medication has been associated with respiratory depression and arrest because it can slow or stop breathing.
Ross says they also requested to give Wolski the budesonide treatment, but the hospital instead gave the patient a generic brand, which is not the best thing to have under that circumstance.
Wife dodges ventilator, survives COVID-19 with budesonide treatment
A husband from Georgia has had a better success in forcing a hospital to give his wife the budesonide treatment.
The husband named Mick tells Clay Clark during “Thrive Time Show” on Brighteon.TV that his wife has made it out of the intensive care unit two days after getting the budesonide treatment and has been able to go home in a week.
Mick says his wife is in really bad shape after a week of battling symptoms of COVID-19.
“She’s 57, has a partially collapsed lung and has preexisting conditions. Her blood oxygen was 50 and her blood pressure was 100/50,” said Mick. The normal blood oxygen level is between 94 to 99 percent. Anything below 90 is considered to be low blood oxygen.
“I went on battle mode immediately. I thought ‘this is it,’” said Mick, fearing that his wife would be put on a ventilator in which very few patients had survived.
After talking with Bartlett, Mick sends the hospital a fax message asking to put his wife under the budesonide protocol – which is 1 milligram of budesonide every eight hours. He also sends a copy to the doctor treating his wife, as well as a lawyer.
Mick cites several studies and a magazine article about the budesonide protocol, but he thinks that what catches the hospital and the doctor’s attention is his threat of escalating the matter to the ethics committee if they don’t grant his request.
Budesonide reduces COVID-19 hospitalization
Researchers at the University of Oxford has found that early treatment of inhaled budesonide reduced the need for urgent care and hospitalization in people with COVID-19 by as much as 90 percent. The study has also found that inhaled budesonide given to patients with COVID-19 within seven days of symptoms reduces recovery time.
Participants allocated the budesonide inhaler has had a quicker resolution of fever, symptoms and fewer persistent symptoms after 28 days. The study has also demonstrated that there’s a reduction in persistent symptoms in those who received budesonide.
Doctors have prescribed budesonide for more than 20 years as preventive medicine for asthmatics. Bartlett has written a paper with case reports describing favorable outcomes for two of his patients with the regimen. A lab study in the U.S. has also shown that budesonide inhibited the ability of a coronavirus to replicate and inflame the airways.
[Back to Wolf]
If, after reading all that, you’re STILL not suspicious that maybe remdesivir is problematic, then please read my previous article.
I have been a poor and rotten servant of the Lord during my too long and too miserable life. I have made innocent women cry. I have led others astray. I have turned away from those in need in their time of need, and I have lied to myself and to God about why I …
In the prior article, there is a VIDEO that explains how remdesivir WORSENS pneumonia by shutting down the kidneys. The people who killed Veronica with remdesivir are NOT telling you that. They are HIDING the fact that Veronica Wolski was KILLED BY REMDESIVIR, but the effects of kidney-failure-induced pulmonary edema LOOKS like bacterial pneumonia.
It LOOKS like the disease did it, but it’s really the DRUG. Fauci gets away with what he CAN get away with.
He’s not a doctor. He’s an administrator. As his CLASSMATES have said many times.
But let’s say that Veronica Wolski actually DID have real pneumonia – AGGRAVATED by remdesivir kidney shutdown. THAT is exactly why Didier Raoult used AZT along with hydroxychloroquine – as a rapid attack on ANY bacterial pneumonia that might develop. So AGAIN – had Veronica gotten the RIGHT DRUGS right away, she would not have died.
In fact, AZT plus even OTC antihistamines (which prevent pulmonary inflammation) will prevent death by COVID-19, as long as the patients DON’T get remdesivir.
In that previous article I did a very fast proof that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) works, demonstrated at a national and international statistical level (the “Lancetgate effect”), but I just glossed over Prof. Didier Raoult’s first communication on the efficacy of a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin (HCQ + AZT) to prevent DEATH by COVID-19.
Here is Raoult’s comment on the uncovering of the Lancetgate fraud. Note that Raoult’s work was never attacked directly (which would have been scientifically suicidal), other than to say that his sample size was “too small” (not in my opinion) when he first communicated his findings.
Hydroxychloroquine is NOT a standard antiviral like acyclovir, remdesivir, and most of the other “vir” drugs, which are all based on what can best be described as “ringer” nucleotides, nucleosides, and nucleic acid bases.
Here is acyclovir, which as a “fake nucleoside” is very easy to understand. You can see where the name comes from – it’s an “acyclic” version of guanosine, where part of the ribose ring has been REMOVED.
Now the part they say about “without affecting the normal cellular processes” is NOT actually true. There are plenty of papers on the side effects of acyclovir. Those side effects are not USUALLY all that bad, but they are VERY REAL because acyclovir DOES impact normal cellular processes.
There are VERY FEW drugs which impact ONLY the processes of viruses, cancers, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, trypanosomes, flukes, helminths, ticks, fleas, lice, and other parasites, and do NOT at all impact host (that means US) cellular processes.
In fact, it’s not easy to say WHICH processes are purely HOST processes, and which OTHER processes are parasite processes. Host processes turn into viral processes by their ABUSE, and one of the BEST ways to stop viruses, is to simply stop the HOST processes that help the virus, until IMMUNE PROCESSES have time to identify, target, and DEFEAT the virus.
Under these tactics, the larger organism can WIN by not giving the virus what it needs.
VIRAL DENIAL IS A VALID TACTIC.
I hope that’s clear. Targeting ANY host process which helps the virus, and doesn’t hurt the host too badly when sabotaged, is a VALID way to stop a virus and beat a disease.
Most antivirals work by disrupting viral GENETIC processes, by serving as bogus pieces in RNA or DNA construction. They are like styrofoam or rubber links that create weaknesses in steel chain.
It doesn’t really matter exactly WHEN and exactly WHERE the “vir” type antivirals cause things to fail. They are simply SABOTAGE LINKS in the nucleic acid chains that viral construction depends upon.
Here is remdesivir’s sabotage molecule:
ATP is adenosine triphosphate – a critical molecule for both genetic construction AND energy transfer.
Remdesivir leads to the construction of a FAKE version of ATP (called RDV-TP above) which has two points of sabotage. One is an added cyano group – the other is an altered ring structure that cannot hydrogen bond properly, because one nitrogen has been removed, and another has been relocated.
It’s too bad that remdesivir is so toxic, but that’s the sad reality of drug discovery. MOST potential drugs have a lot of side effects, and are not all that safe.
Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are not all that good as antivirals, in my opinion, BUT they have the GLORIOUS property of being VERY safe. That is part of why they’re considered essential medicines for their normal uses against LARGER parasites (trypanosomes, flukes, helminths, and mites).
BOTH of those drugs have good postulated NON-STANDARD mechanisms of antiviral action – meaning these drug molecules are not bogus genetic building blocks – they disrupt something else. There is some debate on exactly how these drugs work, but it doesn’t really matter, as long as they work.
There are reasonable explanations of how they may work, there is empirical evidence that they DO work, and they are known to be safe at effective doses.
These drugs are SAFE TO USE.
Now – this is where TIME comes into play.
The main problem with remdesivir is that it is used TOO LATE in the viral process. It SHOULD be administered early in the process, on an outpatient basis, like hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. The reason is fairly obvious. If you attack a virus after it has already multiplied, you can’t stop the damage it ALREADY DID.
REMDESIVIR BOMBS A VILLAGE OF SURVIVORS AFTER THE TALIBAN CAME AND LEFT.
Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, administered early, are like sending in a platoon of commandos right after the Taliban shows up.
Which strategy is going to give the most survivors?
This is a no-brainer. You don’t need a Ph.D. to see this. And yet, literally, THOUSANDS of American Ph.D.s cannot SAY this because they’re afraid of losing their jobs, their reputations, or their potential for advancement.
Thankfully, I’m retired, so I can speak the truth.
Now, as a scientist who GETS relative importances, I can see how to FIX remdesivir. I TOLD them how to fix remdesivir in spring of 2020. Let me explain this YET AGAIN.
I take note especially of the horrible record of side effects (especially total kidney failure requiring dialysis and transplant) of remdesivir in hospitalized patients – who get high doses of remdesivir because they have high levels of virus (or low POST-INFECTIVE levels, but again – the people behind remdesivir are not being logical if we take them at face value).
The fact of the matter is that remdesivir has to be given I.V. – it cannot be given orally. That is the EXCUSE for giving it so late.
But IF it was given earlier, remdesivir could be given in lower doses that would probably work just as well as HCQ or ivermectin.
That is all that is needed. Protect people from death. Less drug because less virus. Less side effects because less drug. And it’s not like a doctor’s office can’t administer a lower, safer, yet STILL intravenous dose of remdesivir on an outpatient basis. EARLY.
They never did this.
Why not?
Now, I believe it’s because curing people with remdesivir was NEVER the intent of the primary conspirators.
Profit, obviously, for many participants, is the “legitimate” motivation. But there is more.
Secret euthanasia of “useless eaters” with remdesivir WAS their intent. And that “authority” to inject people (either literally or practically) against their will requires a hospital setting. The hospital setting creates the EXPECTATION OF DEATH – and that is how they get away with it.
The people who COULD have changed things to administer remdesivir when it would have been safer did NOT, because they were either cowardly, brainwashed, politically impeded, monetarily motivated, or part of the actual conspiracy.
SO – bottom line – if you feel that you have to go to a hospital, DO NOT go unless you are assured that your doctor can treat you with drugs that YOUR DOCTOR wants to treat you with, including ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, budesonide, and antibody cocktails.
These are the things that ACTUALLY WORK. And are ACTUALLY SAFE.
