Tag: spike protein

Saved From The Frankenvax

How a Psycho Vaccine Marrying the Infamous COVID Spike Protein to HIV’s Neurotoxic gp41 Was [Allegedly] Canned by a Mere Testing SNAFU

How Australia Dodged The First Mad Vax Bullet of the WEF Scamdemic / Plannedemic

How Science Monetization and Corruption Has Broken All Vaccine Safety Mechanisms and Made Sneaky Liars Out of Scientists

Mood Music

Intro – Prepare To Be Shocked

This is one of the craziest stories your either never heard, or barely heard. I am certain of the following. Nobody ever spelled out to you how NUTS this failed vaccine really was. This absolutely bonkers vaccine, that was almost used on all Australians.

AND MAY STILL BE.

The fact that nobody even followed this story, shows that the captured corporate media is absolutely not doing its job. Either THAT, or their job is to help deceive us.

And you know where my money is on that.

Surely, in the past, both journalists and scientists might have said something to the effect of “Hey – marrying a cardiovascular pathogenic bat virus spike protein and a neurotoxic AIDS protein in a vaccine to prevent a cold seems a little weird.”

BUT NO. NOT NOW.

And yet, some of us, few as we might be, might still have some questions.

We assume – ASSUME – as in ASS / U / ME – that all people in all of science are acting in all of our best interests all the time.

I have been completely broken of this spell, and I can tell you – what I can see now is not pretty.

I need to prepare you for what I’m about to tell you.

State of Corruption of Vaccine Science

First, a fantastic interview of Dr. Robert Malone by Tucker Carlson. It’s very folksy and long – a bit over an hour – but it will absolutely cure you of any idea that science in 2022 has not been almost totally corrupted by money, power, and SECRET AGENDAS.

This guy Malone is as close to a Moderna insider / honest outsider as you’re gonna get, and he clearly sees the dirty play from the Moderna point of view.

Hat tips to FG&C and GA/FL for keeping this video in play. Gail has been pumping this video, too. EVERYBODY need to watch this.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vuo2uu-dr.-robert-malone-on-tucker-carlson-today-feb-10-2022.html

In fact, I suspect that there is some relationship between this interview dropping that the following “factoid”.

Indeed, let’s just save that tweet as an image, in case Twitter decides Jack is becoming too much of a liability.

One of the biggest BOOMS dropped in the video, IMO, is the fact that Robert Malone WARNED the FDA about the toxicity of the spike protein, and they SHRUGGED IT OFF.

Yes. Malone gave them documentation, as asked, and they came back to him and said everything was OK. And THAT is when he started to think something was very wrong.

We’re about to do it AGAIN – only I’m not the first – I’m just rediscovering an obvious “why the heck are they doing THAT” point.

But we’ll get to that in a minute. We need to broaden our list of corrupt suspects.

You see, corporate “science” isn’t the only bad actor here. What about governments that conspire with the corporations to “mandate” their products for a mutual PAYOFF?

It turns out that both Justin Trudeau and the Canadian government have a very large incentive in mandating the broken, dubious, and just plain BAD Moderna and Pfizer “vaccines”.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vupkuv-breaking-criminal-canadian-monopoly-dr.-david-martin-exposes-why-trudeau-wo.html

When you realize that Justin Trudeau is not only following his mandate madness for WEFfian ideological reasons, and for Papa Fidel power, but also for CASTRO CASH, you understand what’s REALLY going on.

SO – now that you realize THESE PEOPLE care more about other things, than they care about us, the following will make more sense.

The Frankenvax That Almost Was

So just today, FG&C posted THIS TWEET which made me go WTF…..

Basically, an Australian COVID vaccine that falsely triggers AIDS / HIV tests was recalled. The vaccine was NOT sent out for use by the public, because it gave people positive AIDS tests.

GREAT, but…..

  • WHY did the vaccine do this? And by the way….
  • Didn’t this happen BEFORE – like over a year ago?
  • I could have SWORN this happened before.
  • Is this OLD NEWS or a DIFFERENT VACCINE?
  • Or did they bring the SAME vaccine BACK?
  • Or even worse….. AND logic…..

You see, I remember something just like this bit of news, over a year ago. It was some vaccine from an Australian university that accidentally triggered AIDS tests.

Well, when I looked closer at this, it turned out to be THE SAME NEWS. Meaning that this recent tweet was just OLD NEWS.

HOWEVER – I happen to know a lot more now, a year later, so I dug DEEPER and FOUND MORE.

And now I want to explain to you, exactly what is going on.

Because this monster AIN’T DEAD.

VolksWackcine 451

Let’s begin by looking at the actual announcement that all this news came from. The paragraph in BOLD is the critical one. If you’re going to TL;DR past all the rest, read THAT paragraph.

Update on The University of Queensland COVID-19 vaccine

11 Dec 2020

Friday, 11th December, 2020: The University of Queensland (UQ) and CSL today announce that the Phase 1 trial of the UQ-CSL v451 COVID-19 vaccine has shown that it elicits a robust response towards the virus and has a strong safety profile. There were no serious adverse events or safety concerns reported in the 216 trial participants. However, following consultation with the Australian Government, CSL will not progress the vaccine candidate to Phase 2/3 clinical trials.

The University of Queensland commenced a Phase 1 trial of their COVID-19 vaccine candidate – v451 – in July 2020, to assess safety and immunogenicity in healthy volunteers. CSL was working towards taking responsibility for the Phase 2/3 clinical trial and large-scale manufacture of the vaccine, upon completion of successful trials.

The Phase 1 data also showed the generation of antibodies directed towards fragments of a protein (gp41), which is a component used to stabilise the vaccine. Trial participants were fully informed of the possibility of a partial immune response to this component, but it was unexpected that the levels induced would interfere with certain HIV tests.

There is no possibility the vaccine causes infection, and routine follow up tests confirmed there is no HIV virus present.

With advice from experts, CSL and UQ have worked through the implications that this issue presents to rolling out the vaccine into broad populations. It is generally agreed that significant changes would need to be made to well-established HIV testing procedures in the healthcare setting to accommodate rollout of this vaccine. Therefore, CSL and the Australian Government have agreed vaccine development will not proceed to Phase 2/3 trials.

The Phase 1 trial will continue, where further analysis of the data will show how long the antibodies persist, with studies so far showing that levels are already falling. The University of Queensland plans to submit the full data for peer review publication.

UQ Vice-Chancellor, Professor Deborah Terry, said while the outcome was disappointing, she was immensely proud of the UQ team who had shouldered a heavy burden of responsibility while the world watched on. “I also want to thank our many partners, our donors – including the Federal and Queensland Government – and of course the 216 Queenslanders who so willingly volunteered for the Phase 1 trials.”

UQ vaccine co-lead, Professor Paul Young, said that although it was possible to re-engineer the vaccine, the team did not have the luxury of time needed. “Doing so would set back development by another 12 or so months, and while this is a tough decision to take, the urgent need for a vaccine has to be everyone’s priority.”

“I said at the start of vaccine development that there were no guarantees, but what is really encouraging is that the core technology approach we used has passed the major clinical test. It is a safe and well-tolerated vaccine, producing the strong virus-neutralising effect that we were hoping to see.

So we will continue to push forward and we are confident that with further work the Molecular Clamp technology will be a robust platform for future vaccine development here in Australia and to meet future biosecurity needs.

Dr Andrew Nash, Chief Scientific Officer for CSL said “This outcome highlights the risk of failure associated with early vaccine development, and the rigorous assessment involved in making decisions as to what discoveries advance.”

“This project has only been made possible by the innovative science developed by world-class scientists at The University of Queensland and the strong collaboration between our organisations, and many others, over the last 10 months. CSL and Seqirus are committed to continuing our work to protect the Australian population against COVID-19. Manufacture of approximately 30 million doses of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine candidate is underway, with first doses planned for release to Australia early next year. In addition, CSL has agreed at the request of the Australian Government to manufacture an additional 20 million doses.”

UQ and CSL acknowledge the support of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) in partnering to enable the rapid development of the vaccine candidate through clinical trials.

– ENDS –

LINK: https://www.csl.com/news/2020/20201211-update-on-the-university-of-queensland-covid-19-vaccine

WOLF AGAIN.

So what they’re saying is that this vaccine – which uses the HIV protein gp41 – sets off HIV tests. And THAT made the test unacceptable to move forward. The remaining phase II and phase III trials were cancelled, while the phase I trials continued to finish collecting data.

And WHILE they say that the phase I testing showed that the vaccine was safe and effective, if you look more closely, they only tested it on 216 people.

We KNOW from the Moderna and Pfizer tests, that even after HUGE phase II and phase III trials, using thousands or tens of thousands of participants, there are serious side effects that are STILL not discovered until actual roll-out to the public, when millions receive the shot.

And that does NOT include long-term effects. We know NOW that this determination can be critical in many cases.

And one more point for the record. As you can see by the statement at the end of the press release, this vaccine was supported by the Bill Gates organization CEPI.

Yeah, that CEPI, and THAT Bill Gates.

Like I say, CEPI is how Gates gets TWO VOTES, and GAVI is how he gets THREE.

So the bottom line – this vaccine was killed because it set off AIDS tests.

But let’s dig a little deeper into that.

So What’s With HIV and the COVID Vaccines?

When I first heard about this particular Australian vaccine (UQ-CSL v451, or v451 hereafter) triggering HIV tests, my immediate thought was that this might be proof that the Indian researchers were CORRECT – that the spike protein really contained those four inserts from HIV, and that THIS was setting off tests for HIV.

Later, I heard that – no – there was actually some segment of HIV protein being used in the v451 vaccine INTENTIONALLY. Thus, the whole problem seemed stupid, the use of the HIV protein seemed short-sighted, and I promptly forgot about it. No smoking gun – just a stink bomb.

However, a year’s time changed all that.

Think how different the perspective is now.

  • virus almost certainly came out of a biowarfare lab in China with PLA/NIH ties
  • Fauci, Dazsak and minions now known to have LIED about origins
  • Fauci gang also lied when pooh-poohing the Indian HIV insert hypothesis
  • mRNA vaccines seem to be producing immune deficiency, a.k.a. “VAIDS”
  • there are working hypotheses now which explain immune deficiency
  • Fauci’s history with HIV mirrors current history with COVID – lies and hidden agenda
  • Fauci seems to be obsessed with immunodeficiency and vaccines
  • Fauci promoted bad killer drugs as treatments in both cases (AZT, remdesivir)
  • Fauci seems to have an agenda clearly counter to truth as we know it, and is likely serving something beyond the increasing “fake” science which the public believes is operant in the world, but which is very likely a “reduced set” intended to deceive us

Thus, with all that WEIRD background, it NOW seems a bit “par for the course” that somebody in that world would want to bring HIV into the COVID equation.

But is that a good idea?

Now – before I go talking about why this might be a BAD idea, I want to give you plenty of references as to why they SAY it was a good idea.

Let’s start with a good explanation of why the false positives occurred. This article includes a lot of information on the v451 vaccine itself.

LINK: https://theconversation.com/how-did-the-university-of-queensland-csl-vaccine-fail-due-to-false-positive-hiv-tests-a-vaccine-expert-explains-151911

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/duxjK

The article mentions, without too much detail, that the HIV protein is part of a “molecular clamp” – a trimeric molecular “holder” of spike protein molecules. This holder allows three molecules of any attached spike-type protein to stay locked into a rigid, parallel conformation, which will remain in the desirable pre-fusion (with a cell) configuration, and not change into the useless post-fusion configuration.

The article also links to a scientific paper on the technology:

LINK: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7672035/

Front Immunol. 2020; 11: 592370. Published online 2020 Nov 4. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.592370 PMCID: PMC7672035 PMID: 33250897

Rapid Response Subunit Vaccine Design in the Absence of Structural Information

Danushka K. Wijesundara, 1 , 2 Michael S. Avumegah, 1 , 2 Julia Lackenby, 1 , 2 Naphak Modhiran, 1 , 3 Ariel Isaacs, 1 Paul R. Young, 1 , 2 , 3 Daniel Watterson, 1 , 2 , 3 , * and Keith J. Chappell 1 , 2 , 3 , *

ABSTRACT

Prior to 2020, the threat of a novel viral pandemic was omnipresent but largely ignored. Just 12 months prior to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic our team received funding from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) to establish and validate a rapid response pipeline for subunit vaccine development based on our proprietary Molecular Clamp platform. Throughout the course of 2019 we conducted two mock tests of our system for rapid antigen production against two potential, emerging viral pathogens, Achimota paramyxovirus and Wenzhou mammarenavirus. For each virus we expressed a small panel of recombinant variants of the membrane fusion protein and screened for expression level, product homogeneity, and the presence of the expected trimeric pre-fusion conformation. Lessons learned from this exercise paved the way for our response to COVID-19, for which our candidate antigen is currently in phase I clinical trial.

Here is part of a really good graphic from the paper.

You can see how it’s possible to produce a spike protein with the “molecular clamp” attached, and then simply let this recombinant construction TRIMERIZE (form a triple, side to side) around the three molecular clamps, and thereby stabilize the three spike protein molecules next to each other.

This is a bit like a “motif” within an actual virus, where spike proteins, sticking out next to each other, protect each other’s sides. THAT is the basic idea of this thing.

Remember how Novavax assembles a bunch of spikes via modified ass ends into a kind of antigenic cloved apple, to create a kind of fake virus? Same very basic principle.

Indeed, the molecular clamp is even a bit like TWO motifs, since gp41 serves a somewhat similar purpose in the HIV virus, being the root of a stalk to an attack mechanism.

HIV-1 fusion process. It involves both subunits of the envelope spike complex. Notably, gp41 is shown in green with its transmembrane region buried in the virion membrane, both segments of heptad repeats (CHR closer to the virus and NHR closer to the host cell) before and after conformational changes, and the N-terminal end of the ectodomain in gray. In the last two panels pointed out by the red arrows, gp41 is observed following penetration of the host cell and following a conformational change resulting in the six-helix bundle which brings the viral and cell membranes into close proximity.

So – in a very real sense – this whole “vaccine” thingie is a literal marriage of HIV and coronavirus – the simplest possible one.

And they didn’t tell you ANY of this shit – did they?

So all of that WORKS, but the problem is that antibodies don’t just form to the attached spike protein – they ALSO form to the “molecular clamp”, meaning to the gp41 protein.

And what does that mean?

An AIDS Vaccine in Disguise?

The people who made the v451 vaccine say they didn’t expect there to be so much antibody response to the gp41 parts of the vaccine, thus triggering HIV tests.

You know what?

I don’t believe them.

I think they were gaslighting us all along.

Part of this is due to the fact that I’ve seen gp41 named numerous times as a potential basis for subunit vaccines against HIV. In fact, in one reference, I saw it named as THE BEST HOPE for an AIDS vaccine.

They didn’t mention that? LOL. OH, REALLY.

So WHY would anybody be using gp41 as part of an antigen, and not expect it to generate antibodies?

In fact, one might almost look at this v451 vaccine and regard it as an HIV vaccine, with spike proteins tacked onto gp41 as a kind of “nasty adjuvant” to initiate the immune response to the HIV protein.

Seriously – which is the real target here – COVID or HIV? Or BOTH?

This looks to me like a perfect example of…..

WAIT FOR IT….

“REVERSO”.

But let’s just set that aside for now, and pretend that the thing which COULD be a vaccine for EITHER ONE of the two things they stuck in it, is REALLY a vaccine for the fakey-fake cold that we don’t need a vaccine for, and NOT a vaccine for the sexual disease that stands in the way of Luciferian scum creating their polyamorous sexual paradise of literal epic random phuckery.

OMG, these people have just lied, and lied, and lied again. And they will KEEP lying.

But we’ll pretend they’re not lying, for just a little while longer.

So if we have an actual COVID vaccine here…..

…..is it a good idea to include the HIV gp41 protein subunit?

Well, after what we’ve seen with the spike protein, I was thinking maybe it wouldn’t be.

And it turns out, I wasn’t the first person who thought of this.

Doorless Carp’s Suspicious Cat In A Box

When I went looking for the toxicity of the gp41 protein, one of the first things that came up was some guy or gal who appears to have been actively suppressed on Twitter, eventually banned to Gab, and whose substack article on the topic has only two likes – ONE OF THEM MINE.

Doesn’t mean the article’s not important. And I think it’s about to get a few more hits.

LINK: https://doorlesscarp953.substack.com/p/update-on-the-university-of-queensland

Update on The University of Queensland COVID-19 vaccine. “..trial did not give trial participants HIV”, just a neurotoxic glycoprotein

11 Dec 2020

DoorlessCarp Feb 11

This is a wonderful article that is simply SKEPTICAL of the entire “it was pulled because of triggering AIDS tests” reasoning.

DoorlessCarp read the same press release I cited above, and pokes and prods it from the point of view of somebody who knows a heck of a lot about HIV and AIDS, and doesn’t buy what (s)he’s reading in that press release. Something doesn’t sniff right to “them”, and “they” spell out the issues.

I will attempt to summarize DoorlessCarp’s concerns (noted as “DLC” hereafter).

First, DLC admits to actually being led to the problem by one of those Fake News “straw man fact checks”, which attempt to either “debunk” facts or mislead scandals by setting up an adjacent strawman and knocking it down. OBSERVE.

“Fact check: An Australian vaccine trial did not give trial participants HIV”

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-hiv-idUSKBN28R2WT

LOL. No. The truth they’re protecting is that the “COVID vaccine” gave them HIV antibodies, and it was very likely the whole point.

To quote DLC about the Aussie vaccine researchers: “I wouldn’t let these clowns dispense aspirin, let alone design fast tracked vaccines.“

DLC then makes this statement, noting that there is a curious skew between the reality of HIV testing and the idea that there is some kind of a problem here.

Interesting rapid response to the effect that antibody only HIV tests have long since been debunked as a diagnostic tool on their own due to cross reactivity from other antibodies. They don’t tell you anything useful.

DLC then quotes extensively from this letter which explains why HIV testing via antibodies is actually a rather horrible mishmash of false positives and negatives, ultimately requiring a clinical diagnosis and “validation by lifestyle facts”.

Which leads to the next section, which I quote:

So what was the real reason for pulling the Australian trial, was it the gp41 toxicity?

The antibody problem raises more questions than it answers as spike S2 has homology to P24, GP41 and GP120.

This is dark stuff, P24 has been ported straight across from HIVs capsid to the spike protein. Here’s the proof, at least as far as what specific antibodies are telling us, which don’t lie:

What is p24 antigen?

“One distinctive HIV antigen is a viral protein called p24, a structural protein that makes up most of the HIV viral core, or ‘capsid’. High levels of p24 are present in the blood serum of newly infected individuals during the short period between infection and seroconversion, making p24 antigen assays useful in diagnosing primary HIV infection.”

https://www.aidsmap.com/about-hiv/faq/what-p24-antigen

This section makes the following points:

  • suspects the real reason for pulling the vaccine was the toxicity of gp41
  • notes that the spike protein already has potentially dangerous homologies to three HIV proteins, p24, gp41 and gp120
  • p24 is basically the nucleocapsid protein of HIV
  • p24 tends to be detected early in the AIDS process, before antibodies to it form

DLC then cites several papers demonstrating that there is already a lot of understanding of antibody cross-talk between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and either (1) original SARS-CoV proteins, and (2) HIV-1 proteins.

In the latter case, there is specific interaction with gp41.

References given:

The SARS CoV-2 spike directed non-neutralizing polyclonal antibodies cross-react with Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) gp41 (Dec. 2021)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567576921008237?via%3Dihub

Cros-reactivity of SARS-CoV-2 with HIV chemiluminescent assay leading to false-positive results (2020)

https://jcp.bmj.com/content/74/9/614#request-permissions

DLC then lays the hammer down on the fact that gp41 is responsible for the dementia of AIDS.

I’m including the whole thing here.

Pathology:

Accumulation of β-Amyloid Precursor Protein in Axons Correlates with CNS Expression of SIV gp41 (2002)

“In this study, a strong association (p = 0.005) was identified between elevated axonal β-APP levels and the amount of SIV gp41 present in white matter, implicating HIV/SIV gp41 as a mediator of axonal damage.“

https://academic.oup.com/jnen/article/61/1/85/2916415

For those who don’t know, beta amyloid is associated with several degenerative neurological disorders:

Amyloid-β and Parkinson’s disease (2018)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30377818/

Beta-amyloid 42 accumulation in the lumbar spinal cord motor neurons of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients (2004)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969996105000276?via%3Dihub

Alzheimer’s Disease and the β-Amyloid Peptide (2010)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813509/

They knew this way back in 1999:

Mechanisms and Structural Determinants of HIV-1 Coat Protein, gp41-Induced Neurotoxicity (1999)

Abstract

Of the individuals with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, 20–30% will develop the neurological complication of HIV-associated dementia (HAD). The mechanisms underlying HAD are unknown; however, indirect immunologically mediated mechanisms are theorized to play a role. Recently, the HIV-1 coat protein gp41 has been implicated as a major mediator of HAD through induction of neurocytokines and subsequent neuronal cell death. Using primary mixed cortical cultures from neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS) null (nNOS−/−) mice and immunological NOS null (iNOS−/−) mice, we establish iNOS-derived NO as a major mediator of gp41 neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicity elicited by gp41 is markedly attenuated in iNOS−/− cultures compared with wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures. The NOS inhibitor l-nitroarginine methyl ester is neuroprotective in wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures, confirming the role of iNOS-derived NO in gp41 neurotoxicity. Confirming that iNOS−/− cultures lack iNOS, gp41 did not induce iNOS in iNOS−/− cultures, but it markedly induced iNOS in wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures. We elucidate the region of gp41 that is critical for iNOS induction and neuronal cell death by monitoring iNOS induction with overlapping peptides spanning gp41. We show that the N-terminal region of gp41, which we designate as the neurotoxic domain, induces iNOS protein activity and iNOS-dependent neurotoxicity at picomolar concentrations in a manner similar to recombinant gp41 protein. Our experiments suggest that gp41 is eliciting the induction of iNOS through potential cell surface receptors or binding sites because the induction of iNOS is dose dependent and saturable and occurs at physiologically relevant concentrations. These data confirm that the induction of iNOS by gp41 and the production of NO are primary mediators of neuronal damage and identify a neurotoxic domain of gp41 that may play an important role in HAD.

Keywords: HIV-1, HIV-associated dementia, neurotoxicity, gp41, immunological nitric oxide synthase, nitric oxide

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6782354/

DLC’s concluding remark:

“Off to Moderna we go”

Insist that love drive the clown car – Pam Grout

Yeah, I kinda get this sentiment.

And I quote again:

“I wouldn’t let these clowns dispense aspirin, let alone design fast tracked vaccines.“

Is gp41 a danger? It may well be. And nobody is asking the question, because (IMO) the neural pathogenic initiator that gp41 is, was passed off as a “molecular clamp” instead of the REAL ANTIGEN.

If they’re going to resurrect this weirdo COVID-HIV vaccine – and YES, they’re thinking about it – then there needs to be some examination FIRST of what the HELL is going on.

So What The Heck Is Going On Here?

When I was a young lad in the old days of science, there was lying, misrepresentation, and thievery, but it was on a much smaller scale.

We used to joke very cynically, back in the ’70’s, that every natural product being synthesized in a laboratory cured cancer, because we all knew that was not true.

We knew that these substances were really being synthesized merely because the molecules were a synthetic challenge, and a way for professors to make a name for themselves in synthetic chemistry. Almost NONE of these substances would EVER be used to treat cancer, and most would wash out very soon upon investigation. Almost none of them would ever even LEAD to a useful cancer drug. But LYING about their importance was how people got money for their labs. Every structurally interesting new molecule was always the next savior – until it wasn’t.

I used to think that the people giving out the money were fools about this, but not any more. I am beginning to think that the “givers” have always been just as corrupt as the “takers” – they’re just the “insiders” who turn on the spigots for their fellow “outsiders”.

I have no reason to think that vaccines are any different.

I think that a false crisis was used as a massive MONEY-BOMB – a global pile-on of the giddiest and most corrupt kind.

Probably the biggest one in 20 years.

I think that an AIDS vaccine was passed off as a COVID vaccine, by plausibly passing off the natural function of the HIV subunit as a new tool for other things, because – well – it IS such a new tool – just like every new interesting molecule MIGHT actually be some amazing new drug that cures cancer.

They lie skillfully, and they lie with truth, and it’s almost impossible to PROVE that the secondary “oh by the way” was actually the primary motivation.

We have changed from white lies that everybody understood WERE lies, to much more devious lies where scientists engage in fooling not just the public, but even other scientists.

I do think we have to wake up now. We can no longer afford the luxury of pretending not to know.

If I have to thank Joe Biden and his puppetmasters, including his “handler” Obama, for anything, it is for WAKING ME UP with these stupid mandates.

Nothing worked so well, to show us that the NEW WORLD ORDER is a direct threat to humanity, and needs to be stopped.

Science can be good again. But it must never, ever, abandon TRUTH.

And here we are.

W

Dear KMAG: 20220207 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Pandemic of the Vaccine – Are mRNA Vaccines Fundamentally Flawed?

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

Get your rest, Trumpy Bear! You’re going back to the White House!!!

We need to restore sanity in the White House, and it’s time to get Winnie the Pooh OUT.

The Business At Hand

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But it doesn’t matter, because with God, every day is glorious!

And if you need that in a song…… ONE MORE TIME…..

The Rules

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.

The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

Thus we are assembled here to peacefully address our grievances to whom they may concern, even each other, using both our freedom of speech and of press, as well as our freedom of religion.

SO….. [ENGAGE BOILERPLATE…..]

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

Those who cannot deal with this easy requirement will be forced to jump the hoops of moderation, so that specific comments impugning other posters and violating the minimal rules can be sorted out and tossed in the trash.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

That includes the life skill of just ignoring certain other posters.

We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).

We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump prays with pastors during a campaign visit to the International Church of Las Vegas and the International Christian Academy in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S., October 5, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Segar

MUSICAL INTERLUDE

For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.

YouTube is absolutely bombarding me with videos of that Japanese art-pop girl-band “Perfume” that I showed on Friday. The YouTube Wocommie Mensheviks must have some foul intention, so I think I’ll go looking for something else, but just ONE video is a good lead-in, so here you go.

Thankfully, YouTube isn’t just recommending girl groups to me, as long as I get OFF a girl group video page, in which case girl groups are THE ONLY THINGS they recommend.

On a “blank” YouTube page, I also get “epic music” now!

This is a nice one. Don’t mind the “furries” and assorted anime characters.

https://youtu.be/XrisCsNzOlo

This is a long one, too – you can come back for it while reading the features below.

Next, we have one of Wheatie’s favorite artists – Two Steps From Hell – celebrating our lady warriors!

Yes – beware those who would go after our kids…….

They might not be expecting WHO exactly it is, who will DELIVER THE MILLSTONES.

So let’s close out with a REAL girl group – complete with a fiddle!

Now THAT’S what I’m talkin’ about!

Call To Battle

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.

Pandemic of the Vaccine

Are mRNA Vaccines Fundamentally Flawed?

As promised in Friday’s post…..

DEAR KAG: 20220204 – … The End of the mRNA Vaccines …

…..I want to discuss a research paper that was brought to my attention by Gail Combs.

BUT FIRST, let me freshen you up with where things were as of February 3, when Robert Malone had THIS to say about the military data showing that the mandated mRNA jabs were definitively causing harm.

LINK: https://rumble.com/vtztbk-the-covid-vaccine-side-effects-are-worse-than-expected.html

That’s just a quick overview of the problem. Here’s the latest, and in more detail. H/T TradeBait2 for this one. This addresses the jaw-dropping and eye-rolling defense by NIH and their Pentagram buddies, which just dropped military credibility by another factor of two.

Is woke mil causing damage? COMMUNISM always causes damage!

LINK: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/regarding-the-defense-medical-epidemiological

As Malone points out in the latter article, in a beautifully understated way, the “defenders of the jab” are now offering excuses that strain credibility to the breaking point. It is very easy to see that the other side is committed to any deception, of other or of self, to keep the jab train rolling.

They are NOT willing to honestly look at the striking relative dangers of these BAD VACCINES.

Something is very wrong, we can plainly see, but let’s just play along and pretend that this whole ridiculous scenario still deserves debate.

We have plenty of observations at this point, but the “old theory of harmless jabs” is able to play “what about” and temporarily evade many if not most of those explanations, lacking an obviously more compelling theory of WHY THE JABS CAUSE HARM, which would make “whataboutisms” unpalatable, even to those who want to believe them.

Well, is there such a compelling theory?

We have advanced certain key principles which explain things, and those are important.

We know about the pathogenic spike protein.

We know about vaccine migration and persistence.

But something is different, now.

NOW we have a theory which includes both of those things, PLUS a principle of IMMUNOLOGICAL ERROR.

In my opinion, we’re there.

The title of this work is:

Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs

January 2022

DOI:10.22541/au.164276411.10570847/v1

Project: COVID 19

Authors:

Stephanie Seneff at Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Stephanie Seneff

Greg Nigh at Immersion Health

Greg Nigh

Anthony Kyriakopoulos at Nasco AD Biotech Lab

Anthony Kyriakopoulos

  • Nasco AD Biotech Lab

Peter A Mccullough

  • (Could have said Baylor College of Medicine, but Baylor is historically inept, IMO)

LINK: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs

PDF: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stephanie-Seneff/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs/links/61f0b7838d338833e395e22f/Innate-Immune-Suppression-by-SARS-CoV-2-mRNA-Vaccinations-The-role-of-G-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-microRNAs.pdf

The Abstract

The abstract is instructive, and if you want to “TL;DR” past the rest of things, at least give that a read. Better yet, stick around for my interpretation of the abstract.

ABSTRACT

The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease had no precedent, but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures. The mRNA vaccines utilize genetically modified mRNA encoding spike proteins. These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses, promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins, and provoke higher overall spike protein production. However, both experimental and observational evidence reveals a very different immune response to the vaccines compared to the response to infection with SARS-CoV-2. As we will show, the genetic modifications introduced by the vaccine are likely the source of these differential responses. In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage. We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.

What I absolutely LOVE, LOVE, LOVE about this abstract, is that it takes some of the most key points of what the Fake News calls “conspiracy theories” and restates them in fact-bolstered scientific jargon that absolutely cannot be disputed. It’s just beautiful.

Because this abstract is important for understanding as we go into the paper, I’m going to take it “line by line” and explain, so that when we get to the paper itself, you can understand what is being talked about and get the gist of it, even if the scientific nuances are not entirely clear to you.

There are TWELVE sentences, each worthy of consideration.

HANG ON FOR A QUICK WARM-UP RIDE.

Analyzing the Abstract

(1) The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19.

“Widely perceived”.

This is an unarguable fact. It’s a great way to start the argument. State a truth without leaning on the “real crisis” narrative cheese in the center of the trap.

It does NOT say that the mRNA vaccines were brought to market unreasonably, which is open to debate, and which will be a contested question. Remember – many people (including me) HOPED that new technologies – which we were led to believe were needed – would free us from the virus.

Are you starting to see how they USED Trump? In my opinion, we still don’t understand the full extent of the deception and counter-deception. But none of that is said here – it is just ALLOWED under the statement of fact without narrative.

(2) The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease had no precedent, but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures.

“Seemed to”.

This is also factual, if we’re honest. The Jab Justifiers will quibble about veterinary vaccines, and experimental vaccines, and all that, as precedents, but those are quibbles. The truth is, you and I never got one of these genetic vaccines before, and that’s because they had never been approved before.

The beauty of this phrasing – “but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures” – is that it forces us to admit the context of the phony crisis created by the Fake News and Democrats, by only saying “seemed to call for” instead of “called for”.

What the authors are doing here is dropping out the “fake normal” created by the media.

And THAT is an ongoing lesson for science itself to return to control by science and TRUTH.

(3) The mRNA vaccines utilize genetically modified mRNA encoding spike proteins.

This is absolutely true, and absolutely key. The mRNA of the vaccines encodes a FULL “half” of a very particular version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. However, in order to accomplish several goals, the mRNA which WOULD code for that half of the spike protein is substantially altered in several different ways to make the whole process work.

And that leads to the next sentence.

(4) These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses, promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins, and provoke higher overall spike protein production.

There is a lot of nuance here, so I will take some time to explain the 3 items.

(a) These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses

There are multiple reasons that the “mRNA” of the vaccines is not actually normal mRNA, but a kind of “pseudo” mRNA.

Cells have to be careful not to “execute the instructions” of what is essentially WRONG RNA. Cells are a lot like soldiers who have been trained to NOT carry out unconstitutional orders.

The fact that mRNA vaccines and related forms of mRNA-based gene therapy actually work AROUND cellular defenses is a hint RIGHT THERE that they might do something bad. Our bodies are designed to FIGHT OFF foreign mRNA.

Be careful how you interpret what I’m saying there. It’s not an indictment of the mRNA method per se, because MANY if not ALL drugs have to “work around cellular and bodily defenses”. That is a huge part of the science of drug delivery.

HOWEVER, it is always cautionary to admit THAT one is working around defenses, because this will inform one as to the RISKS which are being taken BY working around those defenses.

What if you aren’t actually working around the risks?

So, one truth is that the mRNA has certain bases changed to avoid “tipping off” those defenses. It’s a SNEAKY and LUCKY break that we actually CAN work around those defenses.

But are we doing so CLEANLY and to good outcome?

(b) promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins

This is a HUGE double-edged sword.

Remember – the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein CHANGES SHAPE as it breaks into the cell. When it’s all done, it looks like a different protein – even to antibodies.

The drug designers have (literally, but synthetically) mutated the original reported Wuhan spike protein sequence. The primary reason to do this, is to make the protein “LOCK IN” the original, highly infectious, three-dimensional shape of the “fresh” protein, so that antibodies will form PROPERLY against that, instead of forming against depleted, spent, “used” spike protein. This reduces the chances of ADE (antibody-dependent disease enhancement), which comes from “inappropriate antibodies” that evolved to the WRONG TARGET.

The problem with stabilizing the highly pathogenic spike protein for triggering more desirable antibody formation, is that it also stabilizes the highly pathogenic spike protein for pathogenesis, too.

“WHOOPS!”

So – spike-protein-based “long haul” symptoms from the vaccine can be very long – even compared to long haul from the disease. The synthetic spike protein is really good at sticking around in its mutated, long-lasting, highly pathogenic form.

And THAT might not be a good thing.

Ask this question – why doesn’t the VIRUS do that? Maybe a more stable protein is not only bad for the virus, but also bad for the host, and THAT is in turn bad for the virus AGAIN.

Nature is smart – especially when it cuts a deal with multiple organisms to INCREASE LIFE.

(c) provoke higher overall spike protein production

This is a DIRECT call-out of a problem that will almost certainly lead to arguments with “peer reviewers” who want to defend the vaccines. Note that the wording very intentionally does not say “These alterations are intended to…..[three things]” – it simply says “These alterations….. [three things].”

The alterations are INTENDED to provoke higher overall spike protein antibody production. But the fact is, unless the increase in antibodies comes from better and stronger adjuvants, which act as immunity multipliers, then it’s coming from higher (or otherwise more antigenic and pathogenic) overall spike protein production.

Thus, peer reviewers who want to cover up spike protein malfeasance will likely insist on dragging the wording back to being about the antibodies. This follows the lead of Tony Fauci and his “antibody hypnosis” act, designed to keep attention OFF all of the things that are WRONG with the vaccines.

As you can see, we’re only 4 sentences in, and there is a lot of “battle prep” already going on.

(5) However, both experimental and observational evidence reveals a very different immune response to the vaccines compared to the response to infection with SARS-CoV-2.

This is a very general but very powerful FACTUAL statement, which DEFIES the Fauci / Fake News narrative – a narrative which can’t even bring itself to ADMIT that disease-conferred immunity is a reality.

This is a point about which – if you have read even SOME of the COVID-19 scientific literature – there is literally no debate. Only in the Fake News media and on controlled social media is this twisted. Scientists now marvel ALL THE TIME at the differences between vaccine-conferred immunity and disease-conferred immunity.

And, almost ALWAYS, practically speaking (but ignoring any risks of acquiring immunity), disease-conferred immunity is superior.

You will note that Fauci NEVER talks about this stuff.

But there is more – much more. ANY adverse effects which happen due to the vaccines and not the disease, or happen MORE with the vaccines, rightly count as differences.

The paper is not saying this out loud – but you can understand that it is implied.

This right here – the point about a difference between vaccine immunity and disease immunity – is the HAMMER of the gun going back and making a “clicking” noise.

(6) As we will show, the genetic modifications introduced by the vaccine are likely the source of these differential responses.

THIS HERE IS THE BIGGIE.

There are SO MANY potential implications here, I don’t want to steal their thunder from the analysis of the paper.

However, without knowing ANYTHING FURTHER, this is a profoundly common-sense scientific statement. It is simply saying that different molecules from the virus RNA may lead to different outcomes. That’s almost a no-brainer.

This could happen in multiple different ways.

  • differences in how the “changed mRNA” is handled by the body
  • differences in how it is interpreted
  • differences in the protein product

All of this makes wonderful sense.

(7) In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.

Oh, wait – THIS is the biggie.

This is saying that there is an important cellular communication screw-up with mRNA vaccination – a screw-up which does not occur with natural infection. Stated in reverse, there IS an important cellular communication channel opened during natural infection, which is MISSED by the mRNA vaccines.

IN OTHER WORDS, A PROGRAMMING ERROR.

This is all too believable to me, because I’ve seen this before. And NOT just when I “learned to code”.

This is LITERALLY a sibling programming error of what happens when too many vaccines are given at the same time, and interferon signals STEP ON EACH OTHER.

Now the Fake News media “fact checkers” absolutely will not admit that there is a problem with multiple simultaneous vaccines, but once the standard mechanism of vaccine-acquired immunity was explained to me, it became OBVIOUS AS HELL that signal interference was behind the observed but somewhat unpredictable problems with tight vaccine schedules.

You are allowed to have a different scientific opinion from these biased and forked-tongued “fact checkers” with agenda.

But let’s save the details for later.

For now, just remember that humans are evolutionarily adapted for disease, not hacky pseudo-mRNA vaccines. Our PROGRAMMING MODEL – our DESIGN – our API – is different from what the hackers thought they could get away with, and they got caught.

(8) We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites.

More specifics.

This is fascinating, because AND LOGIC is now telling me that it’s not just the vaccine migrating, but spike protein as well.

And THAT explains a LOT.

Do you see how everything is tying together nicely around the pathogenic spike protein that is NOT being degraded soon enough or fast enough, like the VIRUS DOES FOR US?

Think about our little human biome friends next time, science. They may have a BETTER PLAN.

(9) We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance.

OK, this is bad stuff. But it’s also bad stuff that is right up the alley of FAKE SCIENCE to now “discover” and get big bucks to study. It’s DETAILS that cannot be dismissed.

This is the GRENADE thrown into the narrative machine gun bunker with half a second left on the fuse.

KABOOM.

This is where every “me too!” funding whore is going to jump on the bandwagon with justification.

(10) These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage.

Oh, wait! Isn’t this the stuff that Robert Malone warned us about?

Isn’t this the stuff that Ryan Cole spotted?

Isn’t this the stuff that FAKE NEWS ignored and “debunked”, but is now appearing in every possible mainstream source of data?

Common sense is going to win here.

INVESTORS had better TAKE NOTE. The landscape is going to change, IMO.

(11) We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis.

The beauty of VAERS is that it’s flawed, but we know HOW it’s flawed.

Thus, if you see something that can only be MAGNIFIED by correcting for the known flaws, then you have something you can use.

Just stroll past those Fake News fact checkers and Fake Social Media “con-TROLLS” who spew their talking point about “VAERS IS A FLAWED SYSTEM”. SORRY. Not good enough, trolls.

Everything is a flawed system. Knowing the DIRECTION of the flaws is what turns all systems into useful logical tools.

We will use common sense here, long after these people who deny it are OUT OF POWER.

(12) We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.

This is where they land when all is said and done.

They’re saying that they believe the risks outweigh the benefits with THESE vaccines.

This does NOT say that vaccination per se is a bad strategy for COVID-19.

It says that mRNA vaccination as it currently exists is not a good strategy for COVID-19.

It doesn’t say that viral vector cDNA, “full” spike protein subunit antigen, or RBD subunit antigen vaccines are doubtful in any way. They may be, but the authors don’t say that (although some of the specifics DO have implications for the other vaccines).

The authors only say that THESE particular, current, mRNA vaccines are “not positive contributors to public health”.

And you can do the math from there.

Can the current mRNA vaccines be fixed?

Good question. This paper is likely a roadmap to any such fixes. But until then…..

Mandating these vaccines is WRONG, if not INSANE.

Analyzing the Paper

Now we get to the meat of the paper.

I am just going to drop my impressions, placing them in context as needed. On some of these, I blab on and on. On others, I just make a short point. I do a lot of quoting where the authors say it nicely. This is very seat-of-the-pants.

Introduction

The FIRST paragraph is a generous summary of the basics of vaccination, FULLY in compliance with the CDC definitions. Please take note of that. There is no quibbling about the mRNA vaccines not being vaccines.

The SECOND paragraph summarizes and exemplifies the presence in the literature of a viewpoint that the mRNA vaccines are very similar to natural immunity. There is a point made that is basically my contention of Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis”, but it is phrased very politiely.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) makes the case based upon antibody titers generated by prior infection vs. vaccination, in addition to production of memory B cells, to argue that the immune response to vaccination is analogous to the response to natural infection [4]. It is this similarity in the humoral immune response to vaccination vs natural infection, paired with both trial and observational data demonstrating reduced risk of infection following vaccination, that stands as the justification for the mass vaccination campaign.

The THIRD paragraph is long, but absolutely key.

It is the summary of the guts of the paper.

You will note that the authors are pointing out EXISTING MAINSTREAM SCIENCE which is contradicting the media-trumpeted, but “CDC-silent” narrative that vaccination is superior to “natural immunity”, by pointing out (without saying it bluntly) that it’s not even AS GOOD as disease-conferred immunity, because known “good” responses to the natural antigen are completely missing.

And worse than that, the mRNA vaccines seem to do WRONG THINGS to the immune system as well.

In this paper we explore the scientific literature suggesting that vaccination with an mRNA vaccine initiates a set of biological events that are not only different from that induced by vaccination but are in several ways demonstrably counterproductive to both short- and long-term immune competence and normal cellular function. These vaccinations have now been shown to downregulate critical pathways related to cancer surveillance, infection control, and cellular homeostasis. They introduce into the body highly modified genetic material. A medRxiv preprint has revealed a remarkable difference between the characteristics of the immune response to an infection with SARS-CoV-2 as compared with the immune response to an mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 [5]. Differential gene expression analysis of peripheral dendritic cells revealed a dramatic upregulation of both type I and type II interferons (IFNs) in COVID-19 patients, but not in vaccinees. One remarkable observation they made was that there was an expansion of circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in COVID-19 patients, but this expansion was notably absent following vaccination. A striking expansion in circulating plasmablasts observed in COVID-19 patients was also not seen in the vaccinees. All of these observations are consistent with the idea that the vaccines actively suppress type I IFN signaling, as we will discuss below. In this paper we will be focusing extensively, though not exclusively,on vaccination-induced type I IFN suppression and the myriad downstream effects this has on the related signaling cascade.

Again, I point out that this is being pulled out of the “mainstream” literature.

Does this immune suppression that researchers found remind you of anything?

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/NmhFesU2aPue/

Note that this is on BitChute because YouTube deleted it as “misinformation”.

If you’re thinking “Wow, the media and social media has really screwed up science!”, well, all I can say is “They won’t be able to walk the streets.”

The FOURTH paragraph then begins dropping bombs on the Pfizer clinical trial shenanigans, which basically covered up the placebo group to obfuscate vaccine problems.

The message is roughly “Because Pfizer covered things up by vaccinating their placebo group, as well as other tricks, we were forced to look at VAERS and the scientific literature to find out what the vaccines are doing – AND BOY, DID WE FIND A TON OF PROBLEMS.”

But done much more politely.

The next two paragraphs are a WITHERING ATTACK on the vaccines, simply using the scientific literature. OMG – the spatter on the walls – there are quite a few easy targets that the Fake News Media has been protecting by ignoring, but it’s very hard to “memory hole” the scientific literature to those who can “pay to play”, so the authors just mention a string of scientific findings that Fauci hoped the public would never see.

Thus, the FIFTH paragraph is a summary of VACCINE FAILURE, with references.

The SIXTH paragraph then brings up the wonderful idea that if benefits are as low as we now understand them to be, maybe RISKS need a closer look.

You may want to read the whole introduction, because that is the last easily readable section of the paper for a while.

NOW it gets really technical.

Interferons: An Overview with Attention to Cancer Surveillance

This section is extremely complex and hard to read, even if you’re familiar with most or all of the various biochemical and biological acronyms that are thrown into the melange.

It starts off with a review of what is known about INTERFERONS (IFNs), as well as substances which regulate them, known as INTERFERON REGULATING FACTORS (IRFs).

This is what you need to know:

Type I IFNs play a powerful role in the immune response to multiple stressors. In fact, they have enjoyed clinical therapeutic value as a treatment option for a variety of diseases and conditions, including viral infections, solid tumors, myeloproliferative disorders, hematopoietic neoplasms and autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis [16].

As a group, IFNs play exceedingly complicated and pleiotropic roles that are coordinated and regulated through the activity of the family of IFN regulatory factors, or IRFs [17]. IRF9 is most directly involved in anti-viral as well as anti-tumor immunity and genetic regulation [18-20].

Basically, interferons are critical players in the CLEANUP OF GENETIC BAD GUYS CAUSING TROUBLE. Those genetic bad guys can be EXTERNAL WRONG-GENES (viruses) or they can be ROGUE CELLS (cancer and the like).

This section then summarizes the complex interactions and feedback loops which characterize anything involving interferons, but particularly related to their anti-cancer role. It is made exceedingly clear that improper interferon levels and disruptions of the complex interferon systems are known to lead very directly to clinical appearance of cancers of various kinds.

Near the end, COVID-19 is brought into the mix. A recent Chinese paper is cited, the work having shown interference with IRF signaling by a non-mRNA, inactivated virus, COVID-19 vaccine. The changes are EXPECTED to reduce resistance to cancers, and the mechanisms are discussed in detail. ELEGANTLY, those same mechanisms are found in Alzheimer’s patients, and appear related to development of dementia symptoms that sound remarkably like COVID brain fog.

Finally, a documented case of a rare lymphoma being accelerated by the Pfizer vaccine is described, and a summary statement is given:

Given the universally recognized importance of optimally functioning BRCA1/2 for cancer prevention and given the central role of the TRAIL signal transduction pathway for additional cancer surveillance, the suppression of IRF7 and IRF9 through vaccination and subsequent spike protein production is extremely concerning for long-term cancer control in injected populations.

Considerations in the Design of mRNA Vaccines

This section basically describes the long list of HACKS – many of them very ELEGANT HACKS – that were needed to get all the way from Robert Malone’s initial discovery which enabled mRNA gene therapy, to where mRNA vaccines are today.

The implications of all these hacks for relevant IMMUNOLOGICAL and GENETIC biochemistry, including INTERFERONS and CANCER, are described.

This section SETS UP the long list of concerns which are going to necessarily follow.

Quite a bit of attention is paid to the components of the lipid nanoparticles, their roles, and their potential risks and side-effects.

This section is fairly readable, and if you’re curious about the various hacks, and particularly the purpose and mechanism of the lipid nanoparticles, then you may enjoy reading past the jargon.

GC enrichment and potential G4 (pG4) structures in vaccine mRNAs

This is a difficult section to understand, if you’re not familiar with DNA and RNA “beyond the double helix”. It’s a bit like Morse code. Everybody knows what Morse code is, and maybe how to do an “SOS”, but not many people remember Morse code well enough to compose and send long signals at will, let alone send a telegram. OTOH, if you’re in genetic medicine or biology, you may be familiar with more than just 4 bases and the double helix.

The bottom line is that, among the various hacks that have gone into the mRNA vaccines, some of them are basically “genetic tricks” to increase production of spike protein. The PROBLEM with that, is that the FINAL implications of some of these tricks are not fully known.

Because there is redundancy in the genetic language, and the efficiency of different spellings is not the same (nite vs. night, thru vs. through, etc.), certain things can be re-encoded using the most efficient letters to create MOAR SPIKE PROTEIN. And MOAR is always BETTER. RIIIIIIIIGHT?

Well, it turns out that spellings have implications for how mRNA behaves. How mRNA behaves has implications for things like CANCER.

Going back to the title of this section, “G” and “C” are the efficient bases that are switched to, to make proteins with higher efficiency. The problem THERE is that “G” can do something every interesting – it can bind with itself in a square, to form a quadruple helix called a “G quadruplex”, which is abbreviated G4. See the image above for cross-sections of such a structure, at the point of binding.

There are ways to predict if a G quadruplex will form – these cases are called “pG4” for “potential G quadruplex”.

Midway through the section, this quote:

Summarizing the topic to this point, the enrichment of GC content in vaccine mRNA will inevitably lead to an increase in the pG4 content of the vaccines. This, in turn, will lead to dysregulation of the G4-RNA-protein binding system and a wide range of potential disease-associated cellular pathologies including suppression of innate immunity, neurodegeneration, and malignant transformation [83].

There are further implications. The more mRNA can form these self-shielding quadruplexes, the less that “micro RNAs” – miRNAs – can bind to the mRNA and control the expression. And THAT leads to another cascade of potentially unintended consequences.

The multitude of pG4s in the mRNA of the vaccine would predictably act as decoys, distracting miRNAs from their normal function in regulating human protein expression. The increase in G4 targets due to the vaccine would decrease the availability of miRNAs to target human-expressed G4s for regulation of gene expression. This can result in downregulation of miRNA expression which is implicated in cardiovascular pathology [96], onset of neurodegeneration [97], and/or cancer progression [98].

Type I IFNs and COVID-19

This is a very interesting section on the relationship of interferons to COVID-19. It appears that:

  • lower levels of interferons lead to more severe COVID-19 outcomes
  • IFNs can be used for treatment early, but make things worse if given late
  • interferons seem to prevent infection by COVID-19
  • this would explain enhanced susceptibility to COVID-19 after vaccination
  • COVID patients with antibodies against interferons are common in severe cases

Interferons are clearly key, and look to be one of the most significant differences between the disease and the vaccine.

Are the methylation strategies for cellular housekeeping generally omitted by vaccine mRNAs?

This is a rhetorical question about one of the hacks used by the mRNA vaccines.

To put it a bit too simply, the synthetic mRNA is “capped” both to evade detection AND to generate more spike protein, and most likely without regard for downstream unintended consequences, due to the fact that capping is normally supposed to be both a signaling and a regulating mechanism. The “hack” abuses this feature to make more spike protein.

Rather than simply making an accusation, the question is asked, whether the hack accounted for some of the more likely consequences.

E.g., …..

Furthermore, this also means that eIF4E, which is a powerful oncogene regulator and cell proliferation modulator, will sustain its activities by this competition, for an unnaturally prolonged period of time, trying to counterbalance the competition between robustly-capped mRNAs in vaccines and IRES-containing mRNAs[113,65]. This type of condition results in dysregulation of co-transcriptional m6A mRNA modifications and seriously links to molecular progressions of various cancers [114], as well as creating predisposing conditions for subsequent viral infections [113].

My money is on the idea that nobody in the management chain at Pfizer or Moderna gave a flying F, because Fauci and Walensky are all about the antibodies. This is a CLASSIC downstream effect of antibody hypnosis.

Exosomes and MicroRNAs

This is an interesting grab-bag of stuff, and it’s not that hard to follow, for the most part, so you may want to read it.

Exosomes are basically little bubbles of cell that break off and carry crap, a lot like “virus-like particles” or even “lipid nanoparticles”. It turns out that much of the spike protein which is produced in vaccine-infected cells LEAVES THE SCENE inside exosomes, or studded into their surface. This was in fact discovered by a group in India.

Also, under conditions of overwhelming production of spike protein due to SARS-CoV-2 molecular vaccination, it would of course be expected that a significant proportion of over-abundant intra-cellular spikeproteins would also be exported via exosome cargoes [128]. A seminal paper by a research team in India investigated the role of exosomes in the cellular response to internally synthesized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [50]. They wrote in the abstract:“We propose that SARS-CoV-2 gene product, Spike, is able to modify the host exosomal cargo, which gets transported to distant uninfected tissues and organs and can initiate a catastrophic immune cascade within Central Nervous System (CNS).”

Things get even worse. It turns out that these exosomes also carry micro-RNAs that turn off interferons in the distant places to which they carry the spike protein.

Thus, the available evidence strongly suggests that endogenously produced spike protein creates a different microRNA profile than does natural infection with SARS-CoV-2, and those differences entail a potentially wide range of deleterious effects.

A central point of our analysis below is the important distinction between the impact of vaccination versus natural infection on type I IFN. While vaccination actively suppresses its production, natural infection promotes type I IFN production very early in the disease cycle. Those with preexisting conditions often exhibit impaired type I IFN signaling, which leads to more severe, critical, and even fatal COVID-19. If the impairment induced by the vaccine is maintained as antibody levels wane over time, this could lead to a situation where the vaccine causes a more severe disease expression than would have been the case in the absence of the vaccine.

Another expected consequence of suppressing type I IFN would be reactivation of preexisting, chronic viral infections, as described in the next section.

SO – this would explain “vaccine-induced disease enhancement” – not antibody-dependent (ADE), but rather interferon-dependent (IDE). And in this case, it could be significantly different diseases that are being enhanced, because of the generality of the interferon network.

Speaking of which…..

Reactivation of Varicella-zoster

Fully consistent with the proposed vaccine-induced negative effects on interferon signaling, would be the significant number of cases of shingles appearing post-vaccination with the mRNA vaccines.

There is also a documented case of viral hepatitis flaring up because of the vaccine.

An additional case of viral reactivation is noteworthy as well. It involved an 82-year-old woman who had acquired a hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection in 2007. A strong increase in HCV load occurred a few days after vaccination with an mRNA Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, along with an appearance of jaundice. She died three weeks after vaccination from liver failure [142].

Personally, I have no desire to get shingles again.

Impaired DNA Repair and Adaptive Immunity

As stated – more examples from the literature.

We have to speed up here. This is a long paper.

Immune Thrombocytopenia

This is your “clot shot” mechanism, explained.

This quote is interesting.

It has been shown that the mRNA vaccines elicit primarily an immunoglobulin G (IgG) immune response, with lesser amounts of IgA induced [155], and even less IgM production [156]. The amount of IgG antibodies produced is comparable to the response seen in severe cases of COVID-19. It is IgG antibodies in complex with heparin that induce HIT. One can hypothesize that IgG complexed with the spike protein and PF4 is the complex that induces VITT in response to mRNA vaccines. It has in fact been shown experimentally that the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein binds to PF4 [157].

PPAR-α, Sulfatide and Liver Disease

Two paragraphs are worthy of your attention.

As we have already stated, an experiment by Mishra and Banerjea (2021) demonstrated that the spike protein induces the release of exosomes containing microRNAs that specifically interfere with IRF9 synthesis[50]. In this section we will show that one of the consequences of suppression of IRF9 would be reduced synthesis of sulfatide in the liver, mediated by the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPAR-α).

…

Multiple case reports in the research literature describe liver damage following mRNA vaccines [165-167]. A plausible factor leading to these outcomes is the suppression of PPAR-α through downregulation of IRF9,and subsequently decreased sulfatide synthesis in the liver.

As you can see, there is a prediction here, and plenty of room to investigate.

Guillain Barre Syndrome and Other Neurological Conditions

This is worth reading. There is a laundry list of neurological conditions clearly attributed to the vaccine, and a clear mechanism by which they happen.

Bell’s Palsy

A known problem which appeared during the clinical trials of the mRNA vaccines.

Placebo 1, Treatment 7. Do the math.

Myocarditis

Signals and mechanisms are discussed. Particularly compelling is the proposed role of exosomes in carrying the toxic spike to cardiac tissue.

My money is still on migrating vaccine, but AND LOGIC will do for now.

Considerations Regarding the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

The underreporting of the system is discussed, with some doubt about the commonly cited figure of “100X” underreporting, as well as mention of a more sophisticated figure of 31X obtained by Rose.

VAERS Signal for Immune Suppression, Thrombocytopenia and Neurodegeneration

A comparison of the data from COVID vaccines to ALL OTHER VACCINES COMBINED is made, and the results are impressive.

Many different things are listed. It’s worth looking at.

VAERS Signal for Cancer

After detailing the numbers for cancer (nice table), where the mRNA vaccines have HUGE numbers compared to all other vaccines combined, this statement:

This cannot be explained by reference to a disproportionately large number of people receiving an mRNA vaccination in the past year compared to all other vaccinations. The total number of people receiving a non-COVID-19 vaccination is unknown, but over the 31 years history of reports VAERS contains it is unquestionably many orders of magnitude larger than the number receiving an mRNA vaccination in the past year. Overall, in the above table, twice as many cancer reports to VAERS are related to a COVID-19 vaccination compared to those related to all other vaccines. That, in our opinion, constitutes a signal in urgent need of investigation.

To me, this is enough to say that the mRNA vaccines are related to cancer. Period.

Discussion

This is worth reading:

There has been an unwavering message about the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 from the public health apparatus in the US and around the globe. The efficacy is increasingly in doubt, as shown in a recent letter to the Lancet Regional Health by G¨unter Kampf [215]. Kampf provided data showing that the vaccinated are now as likely as the unvaccinated to spread disease. He concluded:“It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.”

In this paper we call attention to three very important aspects of the safety profile of these vaccinations. First is the extensively documented subversion of innate immunity, primarily via suppression of IFN-α and its associated signaling cascade. This suppression will have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections. Second is the dysregulation of the system for both preventing and detecting genetically driven malignant transformation within cells and the consequent potential for vaccination to promote those transformations. Third, mRNA vaccination potentially disrupts intracellular communication carried out by exosomes, and induces cells taking up spike mRNA to produce high levels of spike-carrying exosomes, with potentially serious inflammatory consequences. Should any of these potentials be fully realized, the impact on billions of people around the world could be enormous and could contribute to both the short-term and long-term disease burden our health care system faces.

Given the current rapidly expanding awareness of the multiple roles of G4s in regulation of mRNA translation and clearance through stress granules, the increase in pG4s due to enrichment of GC content as a consequence of codon optimization has unknown but likely far-reaching consequences. Specific analytical evaluation of the safety of these constructs in vaccines is urgently needed, including mass spectrometry for identification of cryptic expression and immunoprecipitation studies to evaluate the potential for disturbance of or interference with the essential activities of RNA and DNA binding proteins.

This is what I was talking about at the beginning. There is enough here for an enormous amount of productive research on the downside of these vaccines. It’s EASY RESULTS. Maybe not easy grant money, but plenty of easy CLOUT when it’s all over.

This does NOT go back in the toothpaste tube.

Conclusions

Presented in whole:

It is imperative that worldwide administration of the mRNA vaccinations be stopped immediately until further studies are conducted to determine the extent of the potential pathological consequences outlined in this paper. It is not possible for these vaccinations to be considered part of a public health campaign without a detailed analysis of the human impact of the potential collateral damage. It is also imperative that VAERS and other monitoring system be optimized to detect signals related to the health consequences of mRNA vaccination we have outlined. We believe the upgraded VAERS monitoring system described in the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study, but unfortunately not supported by the CDC, would be a valuable start in this regard [208].

In the end, we are not exaggerating to say that billions of lives are at stake. We call on the public health institutions to demonstrate, with evidence, why the issues discussed in this paper are not relevant to public health, or to acknowledge that they are and to act accordingly. Until our public health institutions do what is right in this regard, we encourage all individuals to make their own health care decisions with this information as a contributing factor in those decisions.

That’s where I’m at. Do not take the clot shot. Do not give it to your kids. Tell people how you honestly feel.

I am OK with people having the freedom to take a bad vaccine, but I personally think that coercing anybody in the slightest to take it, is a CRIME.

If you’re scared of getting or giving COVID, there are far better ways to deal with it, than a bad vaccine that does a lot of damage.

Can the mRNA Vaccines Be Fixed?

That’s MY question.

I suspect that they CAN be fixed, but not for at least several years – maybe 5-10, if we’re lucky.

Until then, they should be taken off the market, IMO.

Hopefully antigen vaccines will do better, but if they don’t, we can fall back to treatment and “real” immunity.

Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

wolven

noun

Of or pertaining to wolves; wolflike; wolfish.

Used in a sentence:

Adjectives for wolf include wolfish, wolfless, wolflike, wolfly, wolfy, wolven, wolvish, wolfed, wolfing, wolved and wolving.

(If you can find a better one, please add it to the comments!)

ENJOY THE SHOW

W

Making Sense of Pro-Vax Trump

Risks, Bets, Rewards and Losses – Why Vaccine-Conferred and Disease-Conferred Immunity are Both Proper Personal Gambles When Choice is Free and Enough Truth is Known or Unknown

Many of us were shocked that President Trump just showed his “pro-vax” hand in an interview with vaxx nutt Bill O’Reilly, but if you watch Trump long enough, you realize that he very often gets to the optimal perspective before anybody else – even with incomplete data.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1472987776786354177

It’s worth wondering why Trump said what he said, and said it when he said it.

Beyond the “credit” issue – which I can really see for many reasons, not the least of which is because Trump’s plan really messed up the Cabal plans on COVID – I think Trump knows people who are seeing the emerging data. And I think they are advising him correctly.

I’m going to try to show you some of that data, and what it means.

Rand Paul is a sharp guy, too. Trump respects Rand Paul. It pays to ask why. I think that part of it is because Rand is a doctor. Trump respects doctors, I am convinced. And Trump knows that doctors differ in their opinions, like everybody else, and that he (Trump) needs to listen to a number of them, to see where the best perspective resides.

Rand is not anti-vaxx. He’s pro-natural-immunity. There is a difference.

At the place where Trump’s viewpoint and Rand Paul’s viewpoint intersect, you will find much truth. I certainly did. And when I added in a few other doctors “on our side”, and looked carefully at where I was skeptical of some of their thinking, but also let them convince me to be skeptical of some of my own thinking, I hit the jackpot.

BOTH the vaccines AND the disease make sense as alternative, risky, immunity-conferring antigens. Neither one is obviously superior to the other for everybody, because the landscape of risk and benefit is too complex, and depends far too much on the needs, goals, and medical circumstances of the individual. Worse still, past choices – including accidental ones – affect future choices.

Rand Paul saw right into this – that the CRUX of the problem is that “natural immunity” is being ignored by a monetarily, scientifically, and institutionally compromised medical establishment. Natural, disease-conferred immunity is the BEST CHOICE for many people – particularly when combined with a “delay of onset” strategy, and TREATMENT, which alters the risk/benefit. We have known this all along, yet we have never truly internalized it, because the “Let’s You And Him Fight” strategy of the OBAMA MANDATES has widened and deepened the division between those who choose vaccines and those who don’t.

AND LOGIC.

Trump GETS THIS. And he said so. We ARE falling into their trap. BUT we can turn that around on a DIME.

It is critical for our side – the free and sane medicine side – to EXPOSE and BASH the performance of the vaccines, because the other side won’t do it. But it is also critical that we STAND UP for the freedom for others to take those risky vaccines voluntarily, and accept the truth that it can make sense, during a period where we don’t know everything, and MAYBE beyond that, after we know more.

Mandates are absolutely stupid, reckless, and anti-science. They interfere with medicine. The mandating commies need to BTFO. But letting fearful people take a risky vaccine – a personal gamble – is a part of freedom that we have to respect.

I want to show you data that makes this make sense.

Some of you may be surprised that I am defending the COVID vaccines AT ALL. At present I have ZERO intention of taking one. For me, and my wife, they are a BAD medical choice. For many others, too.

Well, what if I tell you that in doing so, I can defend disease-conferred immunity EVEN MORE?

What if I tell you that I can now see why, strategically, Trump waited until we “knee-capped” – but didn’t kill – the vaccines?

BOTH SIDES HAD TO SEE MORE CLEARLY.

Let me help you see more clearly.

Natural Immunity – More Risk With More Reward?

What I just said there is not always true.

For CHILDREN, it appears that the vaccines are MORE RISK, LESS REWARD.

Yeah, Trump was right about that.

It’s a NO-BRAINER to NOT, NOT, NEVER, EVER give this shit to kids, and I personally hope that God himself does whatever is needed to save children from the MONSTERS who are injecting them with these RELATIVELY dangerous vaccines.

Kids are being deprived of EXCELLENT natural immunity, for JUNK immunity that makes money for Big Pharma.

Just for starters, we may be condemning these kids to a lifetime of life-robbing spike boosters, just by virtue of a well-understood idea of “original antigenic sin”, or OAS. OAS is where one antigen leads to an inappropriate response to a later antigen, vaccine, or infection.

This means that if we give children a misleading FIRST ANTIGENIC STIMULUS, they may then be STUCK with sub-optimal antibody immunity, leaving them for an unknown time at GREATER RISK from the disease. It may very well be that the BEST FIRST ANTIGEN for SARS-CoV-2 is the DISEASE – not a spike protein vaccine.

We don’t KNOW what will happen long-term when we inject kids. Or, at least, most of us don’t. Maybe Fauci does.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Is it a good idea? Should we bet ALL our kids on that idea?

NO FREAKING WAY.

And THAT is assuming that these vaccines do nothing to affect fertility. If they DO affect fertility, then this has to be made a KNOWN and ADMITTED risk, at the very least – not covered up, like it is right now.

A call for Nuremberg II, more likely, if this was knowingly advanced.

Who wants to risk their kids’ chance of having children?

This brings up the question of whether parents have the right to *knowingly* neuter their kids. Some parents already are, by “transing” kids. I think it’s pretty clear that’s where the Cabal is going – neutering and spaying humans. Interesting question. Should it be sent to SCOFFLAW SCOTUS? How is Amy Comey Barren going to vote on that one?

Asking for a FIEND.

I would even extend that thinking to teens and young adults. There is no reason that I can see to give them the vaccine. But should they have that choice, in consultation with their doctors? Interesting question. Very hard to reconcile a pro-life position with that, isn’t it?

But back to natural immunity.

Natural Immunity – More Rewards

Are there, in fact, more rewards?

I think so. Look at these two figures from the UK Ministry of Health, showing spike protein antibodies in people in England in 2021.

LINK:

…..https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf

The darker the color, the stronger the antibodies.

The first graphs are people who have no evidence of having caught the disease (N protein negative). They include the unvaccinated uninfected and the vaccinated uninfected.

The yellow is the unvaccinated people who have not caught the disease – mostly kids.

Green, blue and purple are various levels of vaccination success – the darker, the more spike antibodies.

Now look at people who got some or all of their spike immunity by natural infection with the disease.

Assuming it’s a wash as far as the quality of the antibodies – which is not necessarily true – it’s obvious that these recoverees have a more robust spike antibody immunity – to say nothing of likely immunity to some or all of the other 20+ proteins in SARS-CoV-2.

Rand Paul, right here. The man is asking the right questions.

So why is Fauci ignoring this natural immunity stuff?

Notice that KIDS don’t mount a strong spike immunity, even though they beat down the disease in a hurry, with minimal symptoms. This is likely an EVOLVED RESPONSE – an EVOLVED STRATEGY – a form of EVOLVED INTELLIGENCE. What it says is that kids “know” by evolution – don’t build a lasting defense to the ever-changing spike protein. Meanwhile, the virus tries to “rope-a-dope” us slowly into concentrating on the spike as we age, misleading us with each attack. We lean on the crutch of spike antibodies that don’t work on the next strain, or actually make things worse.

Kinda funny that Fauci and the “follow the science” types don’t respect this signal from evolution, but whatever. That’s the basis of another post. But keep it in mind – it’s likely important.

So let us not digress.

The bottom line is that IF you’re going to make spike antibody immunity your standard of success, which Fauci and company clearly have, as part of Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis”, then by that standard, “natural immunity” from the disease gives MORE REWARD.

And again, I remind you, there are MANY other metrics of immunological success which are highly relevant, and which are ignored under Fauci spike antibody hypnosis. Always keep that in mind.

Natural Immunity – More Risks

SO – is the disease “more risk” to get that more reward?

My answer would be “maybe”.

It’s a complex calculation – particularly if you factor in “not getting the disease until you get it”. When you vaccinate, it’s a down payment in full, and with boosters, you’re even stuck with installments. You are “accepting that the risks happen” at 100%. Vaccination “collapses the probabilities”. But if you take your chances on the disease, by simply not vaccinating, you are delaying the (probably) higher risk, but the “risk over time” is substantially reduced.

Imagine the “payoff” of not vaccinating or getting the disease until Omicron. That would have been a GREAT gamble and winnings.

But let’s look at an ACTUAL COMPARATIVE RISK of vaccine vs. disease.

OXFORD STUDY SHOCKER: 1 in 100 Vaccinated Individuals Were Admitted to Hospital or Died with Arrhythmia During Study Period

Now – let me be clear from the start – this article is a CLICK-BAIT CHERRY-PICKING of the highest order. The title numbers SEEM shocking – until you dig into it, and go to the source.

But still, they’re not “lying”. It’s just misguided. But that CHAFF led me to WHEAT.

Let me include the entire, short report, as it appeared in GWP.

On December 14th, 2021, Nature Medicine released a study based on a broad population data set analyzed by researchers at Oxford University. The researchers examined the risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination and infection.

The Oxford researchers reveal that 1 in 100 or 1% of all vaccinated individuals were admitted to the hospital or died with arrhythmia or irregular heartbeat.

Of the 38,615,491 vaccinated individuals included in our study, 385,508 (1.0%) were admitted to hospital with or died from cardiac arrhythmia at any time in the study period (either before or after vaccination); 86,754 (0.2%) of these occurred in the 1-28 days after any dose of vaccine. Of those who were admitted or died 39,897 (10.3%) had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test, with 29,694 (7.7%) having a positive test before vaccination. There were 7,795 deaths with cardiac arrhythmia recorded as the cause of death (1,108 had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test).

So 1 in 100 of the vaccinated individuals are going to the hospital with irregular heart beat and this isn’t international headlines?

This is a shocking number.

James Cintolo has more on this study.

Wolf again.

This study appeared in the journal NATURE. That is the big leagues. We have to take this seriously. But let’s look at it closely. It REALLY helps to see that entire document, although SUSPICIOUS CAT should come out, just looking at the TITLE.

NATURE PAPER: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0

Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection

See? This isn’t just about the vaccines – it looks at infection, too. Is Gateway Pundit giving us the full story? Maybe not.

ABSTRACT:

Although myocarditis and pericarditis were not observed as adverse events in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine trials, there have been numerous reports of suspected cases following vaccination in the general population. We undertook a self-controlled case series study of people aged 16 or older vaccinated for COVID-19 in England between 1 December 2020 and 24 August 2021 to investigate hospital admission or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias in the 1–28 days following adenovirus (ChAdOx1, n = 20,615,911) or messenger RNA-based (BNT162b2, n = 16,993,389; mRNA-1273, n = 1,006,191) vaccines or a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive test (n = 3,028,867). We found increased risks of myocarditis associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 vaccines and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine over the 1–28 days postvaccination period, and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3), one (95% CI 0, 2) and six (95% CI 2, 8) myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively, in the 28 days following a first dose and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273. This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41) myocarditis events per 1 million patients in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We also observed increased risks of pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Similar associations were not observed with any of the COVID-19 vaccines, apart from an increased risk of arrhythmia following a second dose of mRNA-1273. Subgroup analyses by age showed the increased risk of myocarditis associated with the two mRNA vaccines was present only in those younger than 40.

The TRUTH is right in there.

First, we have to remember that GWP was concentrating on 1% of vaccinated people during the study period, INCLUDING before they got vaccinated, going to the hospital for or dying from a cardiac arrhythmia. That “before they got vaccinated” point is a TIP, right there, that we really need to consider the risk for UNVACCINATED people, too – including these very same people – for comparison. And as an aside, what is the number for corresponding unvaccinated people? You can almost guess that for most old people, it’s gonna be – well – maybe 1%?

And indeed, when the researchers compared the risk of an “event” against the risks of these patients BEFORE vaccination, they got their answers.

The WORST CASE for the vaccines was myocarditis. So let’s look at that, first.

Here is the risk from the vaccines. Broken out with [notations] so it’s easy to understand.

We found increased risks of myocarditis …

associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 [AstraZeneca] and BNT162b2 [Pfizer] vaccines

and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 [Moderna] vaccine

over the 1–28 days postvaccination period,

and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. [STRONGLY NOTE THIS!!!]

We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3),

one (95% CI 0, 2)

and six (95% CI 2, 8)

myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively,

in the 28 days following a first dose

and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million

vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273.

SO – this confirms what we know. The vaccines cause myocarditis. It’s a RISK. It’s a handful or two in a million, per injection.

But now, let’s look at the NEXT LINE.

This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41)

myocarditis events per 1 million patients

in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test.

What this says TO ME is that the risk of this one heart problem, in a vaccine that gives less immunity, is a significant fraction of the same risk from the disease.

Obviously due to the SPIKE PROTEIN, and possibly with a simple correlation to exposure.

I will admit that it’s LESS RISK from the vaccines, but not all that much.

Look at MODERNA.

The compiled risk of myocarditis from the TWO SHOTS (6+10 = 16) is 40% of the disease risk (40).

And yet HERE is how the authors have to word things to get it past the referees and editors.

“In summary, this population-based study quantifies for the first time the risk of several rare cardiac adverse events associated with three COVID-19 vaccines as well as SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in adults was associated with a small increase in the risk of myocarditis within a week of receiving the first dose of both adenovirus and mRNA vaccines, and after the second dose of both mRNA vaccines. By contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a substantial increase in the risk of hospitalization or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmia.“

They played a lot of word games there – take it from a retired scientist. They are also STUDIOUSLY AVOIDING some big stories that would rub the industry wrong.

“Give the editors what they want.”

Now, before I examine that conclusion for further trickery on the “within a week” qualifier and several other points (not today), I just want to say that calling 16 “small” and 40 “substantial” is bullshit.

Author bias, implicit or imposed, as a virtue signal to Bill Gates’ “vaccine culture” in science.

I will bet MONEY that a third Moderna booster would come in at 14 or more, bringing the total myocarditis events from chronic spike protein exposure to 30 or more, AND at the 4th injection SURPASSING the risk of ONE untreated disease incidence.

Well, is it worth it?

I don’t want Dementia Joe telling ME that it’s worth it. I want to make that determination MYSELF.

And GUESS WHAT? I will also bet money that part of the reason that CDC wanted people to mix and match boosters was to get Moderna “recoverees” boosted with the less cardiotoxic Pfizer or J+J vaccines, while not admitting that…

….defects from each spike protein vaccine are cumulative.

See how that works? Science. It’s great when you’re HONEST.

And why IS Pfizer causing fewer cardiac problems? In my opinion, it is very likely because the vaccine is distributing more widely and slowly in the body, thanks to the extreme vaccine lipid nanoparticle longevity (hence shedding) and biodistribution – data that was hidden from us, but turned up in the Japanese freedom of information request.

To me, the fact that nobody sees or talks about this stuff, is just more evidence of “vaccine hypnosis” of academia, as noted by Peter McCullough.

The reality? PICK YOUR POISON. Disease or vaccine.

If we go back to the arrhythmia example, it turns out that the “shocking 1%” actually GOES AWAY when compared to the unvaccinated. This makes sense, when you recall the very common problem of “palpitation” sending people to the ER, long before “long COVID” was a thing.

Yeah, 1% is shocking, but it’s shocking for the unvaccinated, too. Gateway Pundit was just throwing unwarranted shade.

Now, let’s take a look at some GRAPHICS from the study. Pictures tell a thousand words – not all bad for the vaccines – not all bad for “natural immunity”.

On the left axis you have the three vaccines, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna, followed by the disease.

On the bottom axis, time – repeated three times for the three diseases.

As you can see for cardiac arrhythmia (right side), the vaccines are basically fine, but the disease is problematic. This makes LOTS of sense, because the disease seems to cause many problems by nerve infiltration, secondary to vascular distribution, and those nervous system infections and inflammations are highly relevant for arrhythmias, whereas the vaccine is primarily a vascular villain, which does NOT reproduce and infiltrate.

The science makes sense here! Wonderful!

All of the vaccines have at least a little bit of myocarditis effect (left side), which is explained nicely by vascular distribution of the spike protein. Moderna, which is notorious for “disease-like symptoms” at the recipient experience level, is easily expected to have even more COVID-like spike protein effects that are not immediately obvious, such as myocarditis.

Big point – ONLY the disease (bottom side) kicks off all three diseases. THAT is what a virus can do, that a bare protein, or even a non-reproducing virus-like particle, cannot.

Everything is making sense here. Let’s look at ANOTHER view of the data.

This graph has some GREAT STUFF. The myocarditis comparison described in detail above, is the graph on the LEFT. The numbers for the vaccines look substantially less, but you can see how Moderna boosters would quickly approximate the disease, and are already like a “mild case” in terms of risks. The authors of the paper avoid talking about the cumulative risks, but it’s clear that “boosterama” is PRECISELY Fauci’s game plan, and it has problems that got solved for Moderna by mix-and-match boosters.

Fauci and Walensky. Always taking care of their companies. Yeah, I kinda get it. But you gotta be HARD-ASS with them, like Director Wolf Moon would be.

The whole vaccine thing – including a lot of other adverse effects I’ve mentioned previously but not discussed here – looks to me like a trade-off. These are NOT good vaccines. They’re actually pretty marginal. BUT for people who really don’t think they can take the disease, it could be a reasonable gamble, IMO.

There are LOTS of people who take these vaccines, and no problem. I know – I talk to them all the time. I’m the most vaccine-supportive vaccine skeptic on Earth. These people just dump everything to me, because they know I don’t judge them, but respect their decisions. I’m interested in what happened to them, and they tell me.

NADA. ZIP. The most common reaction. For those people, the shot may make sense. But there are a good number of others who get laid up hard for a day in bed, and it sounds almost as bad as COVID. I worry about them. Some – A LOT.

Now look at the second graph – myocarditis in younger people. Clearly Moderna is WAY out of whack, and the others are comparable to the disease when boosted. Again – for these people – really BAD vaccines. This is why you saw action on the vaccines. Get values up close to the disease, in terms of numerical risks, and the problem becomes an elevator pitch that everybody understands.

Pericarditis and arrhythmia? Purely a disease problem. This looks very good for the vaccine. This is what you WANT with a vaccine – to AVOID some problem of the disease. BUT – can we trust those numbers?

I think so, and I think that Gateway Pundit got burned by looking at COMMENTS on a blog post explaining the Nature study.

LINK: https://jamescintolo.substack.com/p/new-bombshell-myocarditis-study-out

This is a GREAT post – here is the conclusion:

 THE TAKEAWAY

Public health policy in the USA and UK need to change fast. As a side note, if you listen to the mainstream media enough they’ll have you believing myocarditis is a mild symptom. Let me be clear, by definition, symptoms requiring hospitalization are defined as severe. What’s more, the average mortality rate of non-fulminant myocarditis is nearly 56% which is experienced within 3-10 years. Sadly, that is a consequence of the likely heart failure that develops after the acute phase of myocarditis has resolved. See picture below 👇🏻

All things considered, it is clear that individuals under 40 are at a high risk of experiencing vaccine induced myocarditis. The good news is, there are ways to deal with this. More specifically, increasing the time between the first and second dose, not giving boosters to all healthy individuals under 40, pausing Moderna for many under 30, and seeking the guidance of other countries. All of that makes for better public health policy and positive health outcomes. To finish, I will leave you with the words of a wise man, “Health care is vital to all of us some of the time, but public health is vital to all of us all of the time”. – C. Everett Koop

Wolf again.

Now – in the comments, somebody mentioned the “1% issue”, and I suspect this is where GWP picked it up. Sadly, the comment author deleted and restated their comment, probably after realizing it had spawned a widely read article.

Here is the replacement comment, with replies.

zuFpM5*M6 hr ago I erased my previous comment. The closer I look at this study, the more it freaks me out.

They compare vaxxed to vaxxed+covid and then declare covid is worse, but they measure rates of myocarditis/pericarditis in post covid with troponin levels and in post vaxx with hospitalization rates. Hmmmm

They don’t include any control group of unvaxxed. The vaxx+covid group should be compared to unvaxx+covid to determine the actual rate of post covid heart issues. This is not done that I can tell?

The vaccinated showed a 1% hospitalization rate for cardiac arrhythmia with ~385,000 in the period up to 28 days post vaccination. I tried to look up population rates of hospitalization and found some old news articles discussing ~350,000-500,000 hospitalizations annually for ‘atrial fibrillation’ for the entire US population. So a group of vaccinated in UK blew out the entire US annual budget of arrhythmia hospitalizations in a couple month period? And that isn’t a highlighted part of the research results but instead they compare only within the vaccinated group broken out by short temporal periods? Isn’t the most important thing the vaccinated versus background normal rate?

I begin to think this whole study was gamed to get vaccinated rates of these issues versus supposed covid rates so they could continue to say vaccines are safer, when the actual #s are showing a horrific rise in these issues. It is a preemptive narrative shaping attempt.

I am not a doctor, researcher or number cruncher, so if I am misunderstanding this, I would be interested to hear how.
br143 hr ago There’s no way to sugar coat the study.

Of the ~385,000 people with arrhythmia, 10.3% had a positive Covid-19 test, and 7.7% tested positive at some point prior to vaccination.

Even if you remove 18% of the total, that’s still an awful lot of people with arrhythmia. I suppose most of us have some form of arrhythmia at some time in our lives, but how many of us are treated in hospital?
zuFpM5*M3 hr ago Yes. I would not subtract them either. I feel that there would be a covid risk increase + vaccine risk increase + covid/vaccine interaction risk increase to account for. None of which can be done without estimating the covid risk increase by comparing with non-vaccinated covid patients.

This is where they lost me. They’re just tossing out “maybes”. Nothing jumps out at me as likely to change the result. I can even add my own experience with cardiovascular issues from the disease. They’re REAL. Very unlikely that the vaccines and disease would FLIP on the relative risks of arrhythmia.

Score 1 for the vaccines.

BACK TO THE TRUMP ISSUE.

Benefits of the Vaccine Admitted by Our Side

There is a GREAT video by Geert Vanden Bossche that I keep pushing, because it is one of the clearest explanations of why “leaky mass vaccination” is a bad idea. Note that this is from a pro-vaxxer who has indeed worked with vaccines for his whole career, and is a former member of GAVI.

He just demands good vaccines, and good public vaccination policy.

Now – if you jump to around 4:30 in the video, you can hear him list the positives of the clot shot. HOWEVER, it may be better to just invest some of your time in that 4 1/2 minutes where he warms up to that point, to understand that he’s putting the positives AND the negatives in context, and looking at the bigger picture to recommend that we NOT mass-vaccinate.

He is saying that we should NOT mass-vaccinate IN SPITE OF the benefits that he lists and explains.

  • a decrease of disease in many countries
  • decline of morbidity and mortality rates
  • less illness in people who got vaccinated
  • severe disease is resisted even when vaccinees are infected with variants
  • they will shed much less virus than the unvaccinated, even when infected with variants
  • seropositivity rates are increasing in the population thanks to vaccination

But THAT is where he begins to disagree with mass vaccination. He states that we will NOT reach herd immunity, due to variants, and he explains this fully.

Global Problems of Sub-Optimal Mass Vaccination

At 28:00 minutes, Geert explains what we need to do – which is NOT what public officials are doing.

The current mass vaccination program will make things worse, in the long term. Geert explains then the kinds of vaccines we really need – vaccines which can both generate sterilizing immunity, AND which prime the immune systems of their recipients toward cellular immunity.

Yeah, it’s a bit of a tough goal, but it’s realistic toward the challenges of the China virus, and honest about what we need to do.

So what does this mean about the benefits of the vaccine?

THEY ARE REAL, BUT THEY ARE SHORT-SIGHTED. And they are accompanied by risks. Not just to the vaccinees, but to ALL OF US ON THIS PLANET.

According to Geert, continued vaccination is going to HARM vaccinees, relative to the unvaccinated, who will need to avoid virus-shedding vaccinees. At that point, recoverees may be in the best position of all, but still – not great. ALL of us will be in trouble from the virus which will escape the vaccines.

Geert also explains how we can prove that he is correct – by looking at the mutations in the virus which is shed from vaccinees, which will show selection for more infectious variants, if he is correct.

Now – this is a GREAT interview of Geert by Dana Loesch, who looks more and more like Sandra Bullock for some reason, but what the heck – the shotgun shells on her microphone setup are EXCELLENT, very non-Bullock, and she gets a FANTASTIC explanation of the problem from Geert.

Geert actually talks about Omicron, and the DANGER of it potentially evolving to be MORE SEVERE.

Take a listen!

Does Trump know this stuff? I don’t know.

I personally believe that Geert is right. I am now of the opinion that most of what we are hearing from Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, and Geert Vanden Bossche is true, but that each one has to give a little toward the ultimate truth.

What does that look like to me?

  • Natural immunity is NOT permanent or complete toward other variants
  • Natural immunity is better than the vaccines, generally speaking, but not bulletproof
  • Untreated COVID is a loser relative to the vaccines, but treated COVID is a winner
  • McCullough’s natural immunity prediction based on SARS1 may be too confident
  • Malone’s whistleblower on more shedding by vaccinees may have been wrong or disinformation
  • Geert’s vax-brag of less shedding by vaccinees may have been too kind and not skeptical enough
  • We have to stop pushing the vaccines, for the good of humanity
  • We have to allow the vaccines to continue, at an acceptably lower rate, for research
  • We have to allow vaccines to change faster, to keep up with mutations, IF and only IF this will not PUSH the virus to mutate and select faster (immune pressure must be low enough)
  • We have to pursue the superior vaccines that Geert is specifying
  • We have to use infection, treatment, and recovery as a big gun to reach herd immunity
  • We have to let COVID burn out of epidemic status, to reach a treatable endemic status
  • We cannot do that with mass vaccination, so mandates must cease promptly and completely
  • Joe Biden and CDC must be stopped – by military power if need be – if they will not end the crazy mandates

Yeah, you heard me. We can’t let this demented bozo, backed by an evil Obama and China, make COVID worse by mass vaccination. Mandates are making things worse.

Freedom, Vaccines and Morality

Trump may not understand Geert Vanden Bossche’s warning, but if we set that aside as an unknown, you can understand where Trump is coming from.

If we want freedom, we have to let other people make stupid choices that affect them most of all. Vaccination is, in fact, one of those things. Indeed, it is by US seeing it that way, that I believe we will end this nightmare of division which PUMPS UP the vaxxies and the crazy mandates.

In the same way that there are vaxxies who now are defending OUR freedom to be unvaccinated, I believe we have to defend the right of people to stupidly (or smartly) take the vaccine. However, we MUST get the rate of vaccination DOWN below the level where immune pressure from the vaccine creates more and more infectious variants.

The FIRST thing is not to take the vaccine yourself, or give it to your children.

The SECOND thing is to fight for an end to mandates.

The THIRD thing is to fight for BETTER vaccines, and to expand belief that the current vaccines are NOT GOOD ENOUGH, and are of the WRONG TYPE. Make the vaxxies demand better, not defend bad vaxxes.

The FOURTH thing is to spread the message that the “socially responsible thing to do” is to support Vanden Bossche’s position, that NOT taking the vaccine NOW is what will ultimately “save grandma”.

The last one is a hard sell, with FAKE NEWS pumping vaccine stupidity, but hey – we’ve fought tougher battles already.

So what about Trump?

Well, he is not in the position to know or respond to the “Geert Vanden Bossche Question”. Not yet. It is only when that issue becomes BURNING HOT, that Trump will be able to smartly push FORWARD from the current stupid CLOT SHOTS.

We will have to RAISE VACCINE CONSCIOUSNESS to levels of understanding that SUBVERT FAKE NEWS. We can only do that by getting most of the vaxxies on our side – to demand BETTER vaccines.

If they want to be guinea pigs – GREAT. They can be heroes, and try the deadly experimental vaccines. But we should NOT be forcing all of humanity to be part of a BAD and MISGUIDED experiment.

And the JOKERS who are allegedly running our military need to understand this. Virtue signals which kill troops, even if slowly and quietly, where nobody can see them, are NOT ACTUALLY VIRTUOUS. I appreciate them kicking out the sane ones who understand that the current bad clot shots may cripple readiness at some point, rather than forcibly injecting them. We WILL have a reserve of trained people who are not destroyed by China and Biden, no matter what China’s coming chess moves. Thank you for that. But as for everything else – there could have been push-back against communism, instead of acquiescence.

Yes, we had to be shown. But I’m not sure showing us subservience to a COUP and CHINA and FAKE NEWS isn’t undoing half of the good stuff.

But this as well. If you guys delivered Omicron on purpose, thanks. It LOOKS like it may be working.

Merry Christmas!

W

Ten Fresh Reasons for You, Your Friends, and Your Loved Ones to NOT Get the HAXXINE

Here we go.

https://futurism.com/neoscope/potential-covid19-vaccine-hacks-dna-build-immunity

10. It’s a “Haxxine”

A lot of people say that “it’s not a vaccine”, and while I actually LIKE the fact that the CDC – for BAD REASONS – made a GOOD CHANGE (in my opinion) in the definition of vaccines, I am forced to admit that the CDC DEMOCRATS did the KNAVISH DEMOCRAT THING and “changed the rules”, which Democrats always do, instead of confronting the badness of the bad vaccines they want to force on everybody, and thus are stupidly committed to defending.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm

Note that the CDC definition change ALLOWS me to call these things BAD VACCINES, because the new definition allows both qualitative and quantitative expectations on vaccine performance.

But I am going beyond just calling them bad vaccines. I did a knavish thing back, and created (possibly for the second or third time – who knows?) a NEW NAME that can be used to distinguish mRNA virus-like particle and cDNA viral vector “vaccines” from the much more standard and understood protein and glycoprotein antigen vaccines which would have VERY LIKELY been much safer and more trustworthy than the vaccines we got.

THUS – I’m calling these things “haxxines” – precisely because they are GENETIC HACKS. One can easily call them “genetic vaccines”, but by calling them “genetic hacks”, “haccines”, or most especially “haxxines“, one gets to the root problem, from the view of scientists and programmers. These things are FAST HACKS – they’re untried methods – unproven experimental fixes – and more than that, they are LITERALLY “genetic hacks”.

You’ve heard of “life hacks”, so you know what I’m talking about.

“Hacks” tend to have a kind of “go with the flow” and “uncontrolled outcome” quality, which creates simplicity and elegance in the overall method, but the downsides of “premature ability” and “unforeseen but expectable consequences” loom VERY large.

In other words, “hacks” give Jimmy Olson the Superman abilities he probably shouldn’t have right now, and bad things can and do result.

There is NO WAY around the truth of things. These vaccines are GENETIC HACKS. I look at the methodology of what was done, and what Pfizer and Moderna are HIDING, and I can tell.

HACKS!!!

Now, “hacking” is how a lot of things are “tried and discovered” in science and programming. I am as guilty as any other scientist or programmer of having PROUDLY developed many beautiful hacks that saved people lots of time, money, and effort. Some of those hacks are still in use, because over time they gained trust and certainty. Vaccination ITSELF is a beautiful HACK that saved millions of lives. The easy cases – stuff like rabies and smallpox – are particularly awesome results.

Hell – IVERMECTIN IS A HUGE HACK!

It’s a great hack! It’s an awesome hack, because one of the HACKED ELEMENTS is that the therapeutic margin is INSANELY LARGE. The hack isn’t GREAT, but the hack can’t screw up!

These kinds of “safe hacks” rarely come along. Ivermectin is so awesome precisely because it’s an antiviral HACK.

SO – don’t consider this as much “anti-vaccine” as PRO-TRUTH. These hacky vaccines are hacky as hell, and absolutely UN-MANDATABLE, in my opinion as a scientist. Mandating a HACK is almost always STUPID. But almost all hacks lead to something good, if you TREAT THE DAMN THING AS A HACK.

“Haxxines”. Be careful with the damn things. They’re HACKY. Are you sure you want to take one? Not me. These don’t look like a “great hack”. They look like a BAD HACK that’s gonna need a lot of fixing.

And I say that as somebody who had to FIX a lot of other people’s HACKS.

OK? Good.

9. Stillbirths and Miscarriages

The Gateway Pundit reminds us that there appears to be a HUGE jump in miscarriages, stillbirths, and “uterine dumps” after the haxxine. It’s NOT just obvious in the VAERS data – the facts are slipping out thanks to honest healthcare workers.

The HORROR is that most hospital administrations seem to be hiding the numbers.

(VIDEO) Doctor Warns Stillbirths Are Rampant Among Fully Vaccinated Mothers, Launches Investigation

December 11, 2021, 12:00 pm
by Alicia Powe

You have to click on this link above and look at the numbers. They’re shocking even to non-scientists, but to a scientist, this SHOULD be obvious as hell.

Look – I’m going to be very straight with you. The numbers are absolutely scary, because they are “anecdotal but precise and outside the range where any kind of error matters”. These are very often “two or more orders of magnitude things”. If you don’t see them, you’re bloody blind, or trying very hard not to see them.

If this happened for any other reason than the vaccine – something like “water pollution” or a “serial killer nurse in hospitals”, the authorities in Canada where this was documented would be FREAKING. But let’s be real – because if it’s the haxxine, it’s THEIR POLICY, and so suddenly they act like they don’t know what’s going on.

And the media just goes along with the insane pretense of ignorance.

What we’re talking about is a situation where numbers of stillbirths jumped by TWO ORDERS of magnitude – from less than ten to nearly 100 in the same timeframe – AND we have a likely suspect that OTHER evidence supports.

Scientifically, it’s a NO DAMN BRAINER.

  • The numbers are STARK and MASSIVE
  • The number one suspect MUST BE vaccination
  • The haxxine has demonstrated proper suspect actions
  • The haxxine has awesome explanatory mechanisms
  • The haxxine makers HID THE EXPLANATORY DATA
  • The haxxine makers have been caught hiding and lying before

This is not hard. This is where the audience SCREAMS AT COLUMBO. And they scream at Columbo, because he’s still playing dumb, and hasn’t yet pointed his good eye at the suspect, and his cigar at the roof, and said “One more thing, Mrs. Psaki.”

I cannot for the life of me understand why the CDC/FDA/DNC complex is MANDATING a bad vaccine for a COLD – a vaccine that so obviously causes stillbirths – unless that’s the plan.

Well, we know Democrats like abortion, and they like contraception, and this vaccine is a bit like a lottery halfway between them, and – damn, Mrs. Psaki – THAT SURE MAKES SENSE.

Don’t take the haxxine if you’re pregnant, or ever planning to get pregnant. Just don’t. It’s just stupid.

OK?

Something is VERY WRONG with this vaccine, and just because the people who would be hurt by the admission won’t admit it, doesn’t mean there isn’t something very wrong with the vaccine.

I mean haxxine.

8. Your Kid Could Get a “Toxic Batch” of the Pfizer Vaccine.

If you’re thinking of vaccinating your kids, you need to be aware of the fact that the Pfizer vaccine for kids appears to have a “toxic batch problem” very similar to the adult vaccine.

Not only is the number of adverse outcome events in children absolutely unacceptable, in my opinion – there seems to be a systematic problem with the vaccine which has NOT been identified.

I definitely recommend reading THIS article.

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/12/medicine-regulators-harming-children-with-dangerous-batches-of-covid-vaccine/

Now, I’m going to be completely blunt here. IGNORING all of the possibilities of long-term damage, like myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke, sterility, etc., and JUST looking at “immediate reactions to the Pfizer COVID vaccine”, and then comparing THOSE reactions to most childhood vaccines, which are absolutely DWARFED in VAERS by the Pfizer numbers, I don’t think there is any way that I would vaccinate a young child, older child, teen or young adult with this vaccine.

It’s just POINTLESS. The risks from the disease itself to those cohorts are absolutely minuscule and mild, but the risks from the vaccine are definite and serious – and FAR WORSE than EVERY other vaccine. In fact, they’re far worse than historic bad vaccines that got withdrawn.

It is STUPID to vaccinate your kid – particularly just because DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS say so. They don’t have good reasons – they’re just “order-followers” like Nazis. And if you can’t see THAT – well, think what that means. Are YOU a stupid “order-following” Nazi?

I simply find it stupid to take needless risks like this – that don’t even offer FUN as a reward. Buy your kid a higher-quality bicycle helmet. Teach them how to swim. Take them hiking and climbing and skating. There are thousands of stupid fun things that still make sense. This vaccine does not.

It makes sense for Pfizer and the politicians it bribes. That’s about it.

7. Original Antigenic Sin is a Real and Very Serious Reason to Stop Vaccinating Everyone

That is actually the title of a very interesting substack blog post explaining TWO recent scientific papers. You can find links to the papers in the blog post.

LINK: https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/original-antigenic-sin-is-a-real

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/Ivs6f

This excellent post spends most of its effort explaining the papers, which largely show how prior antibody immunity to ANY human coronavirus other than the particular strain in question, tends to HURT immunity to the ONE in question.

Basically, prior coronavirus exposure MISLEADS antibody response to later coronavirus infection.

Thus, the idea of “original antigenic sin” is that what your immune system initially “imprints” on, will determine what it does later, and if it imprints on the wrong thing, it will lead to wrong responses.

What this tells us, is that natural immunity which does NOT use OLD PLAYBOOKS is what wins against coronaviruses, but the VACCINES are always OLD SPECIFIC PLAYBOOKS, and therefore not very good.

Here is the author, eugyppius.

FTA:

The severity of Corona infection varies wildly across the population. Children have generally mild or asymptomatic infections, while adults have a wide range of responses. Everyone always assumed that cross-immunity was part of the answer to this conundrum. The problem is that – at least as far as antibodies go – it is shaping up to be a not very reassuring part of that answer. The innate and non-specific immune response of children looks more and more like a big part of the reason they are spared severe infection. Adults with immune systems tightly calibrated to the common human coronaviruses, meanwhile, often have more severe symptoms. They suffer from Original Antigenic Sin.

Over 4.2 billion people across the earth have received at least one dose of vaccine against SARS-2. The majority of these vaccines have elicited antibodies only against an early form of the spike protein that is no longer in circulation.

This would seem to be one reason why many western countries with high vaccination rates appear to have locked themselves into an indefinite phase of heightened SARS-2 transmission. In the United Kingdom, 96% of adults have antibodies to the spike protein – most of these first acquired by vaccination. Shortly after they concluded their vaccination campaign, cases skyrocketed, and they have remained high ever since.

Original Antigenic Sin is a real phenomenon. It seems not only to permanently influence the immune response to the spike protein itself, but also to inhibit the development of antibodies to other SARS-2 proteins. A worst case scenario, would be a future spike mutation that entirely escapes the anti-spike antibodies elicited by our vaccines. In this case, it seems possible that many vaccinated people will be stuck with permanently suboptimal immune responses. If Omicron is indeed circulating primarily among the vaccinated, as some data suggests, this would seem to be one possibly reason why. These concerns are particularly acute in the case of children, who may well be exposed to the risk of very serious illness in the future, if vaccination permanently misdirects their immune system.

Wolf again.

“Misdirection” is the word we are looking for here. This allows us to go beyond the idea of “original antigenic sin”, to expand the idea to “subsequent antigenic sin”.

EVERY exposure from birth to death – vaccine, infectious disease, or natural (sub-infective) – has the potential to mislead our immune systems in later exposures, and there is no reason to think that Fauci or Big Pharma are going to come up with vaccines that are going to “lead smarter” than our highly evolved natural immune systems, in my scientific opinion.

Basically, it’s as if coronaviruses are excellent attacking boxers which (by evolutionary memory) remember the jabs and punches that “got through” before, and if you waste energy making any of those old moves, you will be “rope-a-doped” by the coronavirus.

Thus, like the viruses, WE have “evolved memory” of how to combat shape-shifters, with our own shape-shifting response, which looks for NEW ATTACKS – not old ones.

What this says to me is that Fauci’s “yesterday’s news” antibody-based vaccine strategy is COMPLETELY WRONG.

One of the things I’ve noticed is Fauci’s reluctance to move on from Original Wuhan vaccines. Yes, we drop our jaws at the mere MENTION of vaccines “tailored” to newer variants, and I totally get the idea of warning about the Fauci “rona-coaster”. I absolutely agree that Fauci is dangling that clearly-planned strategy in front of us as a future narrative talking point.

LINK: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/08/whoot-there-it-is-anthony-fauci-says-we-are-prepared-to-start-delivering-variant-specific-booster-vaccines/

BUT – at the same time – Fauci seems really intent on pushing vaccination with permanently and massively sub-optimal out-of-date vaccines, which are definitely MISLEADING our immune systems.

Thus, it strikes me that Fauci is trying to get the “worst of both worlds”. He’s not treating GOOD, HIGHLY CURRENT vaccine specificity with the seriousness it deserves. Rather, he is trying to MILK the bad, delta-failing vaccines for all they’re worth.

Something is WRONG here. I think a lot of it has to do with Fauci’s “funding-centric” view of public health. I think he has a distorted set of priorities, based on the extreme compromises that he has made with the industry. It explains remdesivir, and it explains these bad, out-of-date vaccines.

But the bottom line is this. There is clearly more here than Fauci understands, and mandating these CONFIRMED immunity-misleading vaccines over natural immunity is wrong, and possibly – quite possibly – a kind of murderous hubris.

6. The Haxxines Appear to Offer No Benefit When Viewed from All-Cause Mortality

This is a subtle point, but it’s a very effective argument with me, because it does not let anything escape. No matter how hidden the effects – positive or negative – of the vaccines, in the end, all-cause mortality numbers that don’t shift tell me that the vaccines simply aren’t working as a public health policy.

LINK: https://beckernews.com/exclusive-its-game-over-for-the-cdc-if-these-death-rates-hold-true-43385/

People are very likely trading some slight improvement in risk of death from COVID, for some slight increase in risk of death from haxxine side effects.

Overall? They’re just not doing much good.

No thanks. Not worth it. Demand BETTER VACCINES. Or maybe even a different solution.

5. Vaccination Against Wuhan Made People More Susceptible to Infection by Beta, Gamma, and Delta (But Not Alpha) Variants in the Netherlands

I’m just reporting the study, which is BLUNT evidence of “vaccine-enhanced infection”, a.k.a. VEI.

We will talk more about VEI below, and where it may come from.

TITLE: Increased risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 Beta, Gamma, and Delta variant compared to Alpha variant in vaccinated individuals

LINK: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.24.21266735v1.full-text

ABSTRACT: The extent to which severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC) break through infection- or vaccine-induced immunity is not well understood. Here, we analyze 28,578 sequenced SARS-CoV-2 samples from individuals with known immune status obtained through national community testing in the Netherlands from March to August 2021. We find evidence for an increased risk of infection by the Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), or Delta (B.1.617.2) variants compared to the Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant after vaccination. No clear differences were found between vaccines. However, the effect was larger in the first 14-59 days after complete vaccination compared to 60 days and longer. In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with Beta, Gamma or Delta variants relative to Alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity.

I want to emphasize that last sentence:

In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with Beta, Gamma or Delta variants relative to Alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity.

So, according to this, I made the right choice, not getting vaccinated, in terms of resisting infection with the delta variant. Delta eventually got me, but it likely would have gotten me SOONER if I’d gotten the vaccine – at least that is the prediction I would make based on the results of this study.

Hmmmmmm.

4. Childhood Deaths are Going Up Since They Started Getting The Haxxine

I want to scream “XXXXING MURDERERS”, but I will resist. For now.

TITLE: Deaths among Children are 44% higher than the 5-year-average since they were offered the Covid-19 Vaccine according to ONS data

LINK: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/24/child-deaths-increasing-since-offered-covid-vaccine/

Yeah, it’s not PROOF, but GOOD GRIEF – it’s one of the most dangerous “correlations that looks a hell of a lot like causation” that I’ve seen in a while.

What if Trump was right, and kids should not be getting this vaccine?

Mandating it? OBVIOUSLY wrong.

I would say this is close to the point where non-violent solutions not only run out of justification, but may in fact be viewed as collaboration with evil.

This is where Christ turns into a “chucker of millstones like asteroids”. This ain’t “smiley Jesus” stuff.

Something is VERY wrong with not only our criminal DOJ, but even with our alleged “white hats” if they’re protecting this shit, worse still, mandating it.

3. COVID Recoverees Are Statistically Better Off Avoiding the Jabs

Karl Denninger was all over this one. Title: “Debate Is Over Folks; Facts Came In”.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244442

I will start by briefly summarizing what Karl ends up saying, which is complicated (you will see).

Karl looked at the pre-print of a HUGE scientific study in Israel.

The title of the study is “Protection and waning of natural and hybrid COVID-19 immunity“.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.04.21267114v1.full.pdf

There will likely be a lot of arguments over what the results mean, and they will depend upon what your “metrics of success” are.

Karl is of the same opinion as me, that ONLY SEVERE OUTCOMES MATTER with COVID-19. If you get sick and recover, and don’t die or go to the hospital, it’s all OK. Even better if you get good immunity which staves off the NEXT illness out of the deal.

Based on that opinion, the results here would argue that OLDER people who have already gotten the disease, are better off NOT GETTING THE VACCINE, in order to avoid severe outcomes.

I mean haxxine. Whatever.

You will have lower risks if you just stay on the natural immunity track. This is what I figured from all the early studies of COVID-19. It is part of my caution toward vaccines which were explicitly NOT TESTED on recoverees, who were REMOVED from the study populations by the drug companies.

The data is complex and it’s easy to slice it different ways. Here is Karl’s take:

FTA

To summarize:

  • Natural immunity is more-protective than vaccination and not a little either.  It is more than double the effective protection beyond the first two months after being vaccinated.  In other words being jabbed not only is a poor second choice in terms of generating immunity it cannot be considered comparable in any way.
  • In the younger cohorts being jabbed beats being recovered for severe outcomes if you get infected.  But when adjusted for odds of infection it loses, badly, beyond the first two months.  This is very important because the odds of a severe outcome for a young person are quite low in the first place.  In short there is a clean argument that a young person, due to the decay of immunity from the jabs, is better off being infected as their immunity is more-durable and on an infection-risk adjusted basis if previously infected they are less-likely, by quite a lot, to have a severe outcome on a second encounter.  This of course ignores early treatment that may reduce severe outcome risk — which nobody who is other than desirous of a large body count would ignore.  We haven’t ignored early treatment on purpose have we?
  • While it is is true that being jabbed after or before infection does indeed reduce the risk of being infected with a third immunity-generating event if you do get infected it has demonstrated negative effectiveness in the recovered cohort when it comes to severe outcomes.  It will be very interesting to see how this plays as time goes on because many of these infections occurred quite-recently with Delta and given the known much slower decay of immunity from infection than vaccination there is a confounding factor that, in combination with the low event count, leaves us with a jury that is still out in this specific case.
  • Given that vaccination after infection increases the risk of severe outcomes over someone with natural immunity if you get a second infection being vaccinated after infection is likely harmful, and not a little either.  Getting infected again after infection and then vaccination is a third immunity-generating event.  There is no data on this via the natural route (that is, infected, recovered, infected again and recovered, and then infected a third time.)  Given the deterioration in protection from severe outcome if infected after recovery and then vaccination, which is quite significant for all except the youngest cohort, it is likely that being infected twice not only produces superior resistance to infection it also avoids the severe outcome risk increase.

Note that none of this includes the risk from the jabs themselves.  To the mortality and morbidity (“severe” outcomes) you must also add that which comes directly from the medication, since no drug is ever without said risks.

What is clear is that natural immunity is superior both in terms of protection from repeat infection and from severe outcomes. In addition being boosted had negative or no effectiveness in preventing severe outcomes among everyone except those under 40, where there were too few events to get clean statistical evidence.  This implies that vaccinated immunity, when “refreshed”, does not alter the course of a breakthrough infection yet that was the remaining leg on which the argument rested, that it prevented severe outcomes.  That should be evident in the data with a significant decrease in severe outcomes across all cohorts and it is not.

What’s worse is that a third event (infection) after recovering and then being jabbed led to increases in severe disease risk if you got a breakthrough, and quite-materially so, over simple recovery.

This argues that jabbing a recovered person, while it may produce apparent superior resistance to infection, is in fact worthless or worse because when adjusted for the severe event risk the reinfection and severe outcome risk is actually HIGHER if you got vaccinated after being infected.

And finally this data also demonstrates that being infected after vaccination produces a materially faster immunity decay than infection alone which is solid evidence that vaccination in fact materially impairs the natural immunity process.  That is, aside from direct side effect risk it screws your natural immunity duration when, not if, you get infected after being vaccinated anyway.

WOLF again.

Denninger believes that the results indicate something called VEI – vaccine-enhanced infection.

VEI is basically a broader category that includes ADE – antibody-dependent enhancement – but it doesn’t restrict the disease-enhancing mechanism to antibodies, even though in any complex mechanism, some sort of positive or negative failure by antibodies is almost assuredly involved. Thus, by REMOVING antibodies from the name, VEI prevents arguments from getting sidetracked as to exactly WHY the vaccines are enhancing subsequent infections. VEI means you gave a vaccine which made a subsequent infection WORSE. You can figure out why and whether it’s ADE later.

NOW – let me start off with a CRITICAL SIDEBAR on VEI and where it likely comes from.

FREAKY SIDEBAR ON VEI AND FAUCI’S DIRECT INVOLVEMENT IN ITS APPEARANCE IN BOTH COVID-19 AND VACCINES THEREOF

Denninger’s last point – that vaccination is shown here to “mess up” natural immunity to COVID – doesn’t even get into the very real likelihood that vaccination is ALSO messing up natural immunity to other diseases and possibly cancers. THAT is the stuff that Drs. Cole and Thompson have found in the jabbed. There’s more new evidence of VEI in scientific papers (shocking evidence, actually) which Denninger has covered elsewhere, but set that aside for later. It’s small potatoes compared to the following.

Decreased general immunity TO all diseases and cancers, CAUSED by both the disease and even more so by the vaccines, SEEMS to be one of the huge RISKS (and this actually happened) of having inserted sequences for HIV features into the spike protein during “Bat Woman’s” research, and then by necessity or not, sneakily / stupidly / cunningly, bringing those same features into the vaccines, which – bizarrely – is something that ANTHONY FAUCI apparently holds patents to.

And all of this stuff is related to things that Fauci and his buddies LIED ABOUT and DENIED.

And all of this stuff is stuff that “DRASTIC” missed by a mile, by strawmanning away from it. It’s obvious as hell now why DRASTIC was “supported” by CIA/WaPo, Twitter, and all the usual scoundrels. They’re the “Plan B” to hide Fauci’s and China’s and WEF’s murderous felonies, by “snopesing” us with an accidental misdemeanor that leaves out the more shocking horrors that bring down puppet governments.

Yes. You heard that right. Karen Kingston found this stuff. And I had to watch what she said FIVE TIMES to fully GRASP and ACCEPT what she is saying. I thought she might be exaggerating or leaving out something – some part of this. She’s not. The simple FACTS alone are SHOCKING.

SIDEBAR WITHIN A SIDEBAR

I don’t know if you ever saw the movie Impostor with Gary Sinise, which is based on a short story by Philip K. Dick, but my immediate reaction was the question “Is Anthony Fauci some kind of ‘impostor’ whose goal is to destroy humans on this planet?” I’m not kidding. That was my first thought. Because what he’s doing sure seems like a great way to attack intelligent life on this planet. Just sayin’.

OK – has your jaw dropped yet? Good. It should. I’ll just give you the links and the video. Stew Peters doesn’t really let Karen Kingston explain this in the detail it deserves, so she says things with a brevity that allows for unwarranted doubts to fester.

Karen Kingston needs an hour on OAN with somebody like me or Kirsch or Malone or Denninger to explain things, but she has a huge story here.

Fauci and his crew of science grifters consciously put HIV molecular features [which could, of course, risk HIV-like outcomes] into the spike protein of the more communicable and more dangerous disease, which risked exactly what we are experiencing with the disease, and they didn’t just do it knowingly (as you can READ FROM THE LITERATURE) – they took out patents on doing the same features in vaccines, which makes THEM riskier of the same dangers. And then of course they lied about all of that and tried to cover it up. And to top it off, they supposedly changed patent wording to include accidental and intentional releases for some kind of patentability reason, which makes me wonder what the hell is going on in the Patent Office as well.

And remember those Indian scientists at the beginning who spotted those four “HIV inserts”? Which Fauci and company forced the journal to retract? Yeah, that’s what we’re talking about. That science makes sense now. The evidence is now in VAERS. The evidence is in the patents. THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND THEN THEY LIED ABOUT IT AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.

What the HELL!!!

THIS IS THE GREATEST SCIENTIFIC SCANDAL IN HISTORY.

LINK: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/12/fauci-patent-vaxxed-induced-aids-biotech-analyst-hiv-glycoprotein-120-contained-in-vaxx/

LINK: https://rumble.com/vqhqop-fauci-patent-vaxxed-induced-aids-biotech-analyst-hiv-glycoprotein-120-conta.html

LINK: https://brandnewtube.com/watch/karen-kingston-fauci-patent-vaxxed-induced-aids-hiv-glycoprotein-120-contained-in-vaxx_r14CHFmoubcfHla.html

And oh, yeah, there is an Israeli study that shows worse outcomes in the vaccinated.

NEXT.

2. An Israeli In-Depth Study of a Breakthrough Exposure Outbreak Incident Showed Worse Outcomes For The Vaccinated

This is one that Denninger posted about EARLIER in relation to VEI. And unlike some cases where he hyperventilates, in this case, IMO, it’s MUCH WORSE than Denninger reported.

Going to the ACTUAL PAPERS – if you’re used to reading scientific papers – proved MORE SHOCKING than what Denninger said.

Denninger: Simply Put: It DOES NOT WORK

The Lancet: The epidemiological relevance of the COVID-19-vaccinated population is increasing

Israeli Letter: Nosocomial outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a highly vaccinated population, Israel, July 2021

If you look at this, what you see is that the people who were unvaccinated got off much better than the vaccinated. It’s VERY obvious. You can just read it for yourselves – any of those links.

Denninger is able to rant more. Start off with him.

In The Lancet, it’s just mentioned, but the authors are trying, as much as they can get away with in a controlled science press, to WARN people that it’s really a “pandemic of the vaccinated” now.

And in the original Israeli paper, they are also trying very CAREFULLY to warn people that it’s a WORSE PANDEMIC for the vaccinated.

And ALL OF THAT leads me to a BLOG POST where somebody named Herschel Smith spotted something very, very, very telling.

I had no idea WHY Pfizer was doing what they are doing, by not supplying their new COVID drug as a single compound, but rather in a FORCED combination with an AIDS drug.

Well, now THAT all makes sense.

1. Pfizer May Be Sneaking Ritonavir (AIDS Drug) into its COVID Pill To Cover Up Vaccine-Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (VAIDS)

I have no idea if the guy who wrote this blog post, which is ABOUT Denninger’s post on the Israeli letter, is the one who figured this out, or if he just read the idea somewhere else. All I know is that I absolutely think he’s right.

Herschel Smith: The Vaccines Make Everything Worse

FTA:

We’ve extensively discussed the damage the vaccine is doing to the immune system, the increased risk of cancer, the pericarditis, and the blood clots and hemorrhaging associated with the shots.  Put simply, its side effects are awful.  But before that is even considered, they simply don’t work.  This from Karl Denninger.

Oops….

In Israel a nosocomial outbreak was reported involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members. The source was a fully vaccinated COVID-19 patient. The vaccination rate was 96.2% among all exposed individuals (151 healthcare workers and 97 patients). Fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died, the two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease [[4]]

Not just oops, VEI.

Vaccine Enhanced Infections.

This is in The Lancet, a high-quality prestigious medical journal.

Except that I don’t think it’s oops.  I think all of this was intended.

See also this.  Israel is in real trouble with a veritable blizzard of sickness.  Make sure not to miss the fact that the new Pfizer Covid pill has HIV medication in it.

Not, of course, to treat the virus, but to treat the effects of the vaccine.

That’s quite a scam, yes?  Develop a shot that harms you for a disease your colleague (Fauci) developed, and then develop the drug that allegedly will make you better from the harm you perpetrated on people to begin with.

Wolf again.

Yes – the Pfizer drug PAXLOVID (good GRIEF – what focus group created THAT name?) includes both a COVID protease inhibitor, PF-07321332, and an older AIDS drug, ritonavir.

Now – Pfizer states a plausible reason to include the HIV drug ritonavir – namely to shut down liver metabolism to increase the concentration of the ACTUAL anti-COVID protease inhibitor PF-07321332.

But really, this just sounds like a paper-thin justification for administering an HIV drug to cover up the HIV-related consequences of the Pfizer vaccine, which stupidly incorporated all of the HIV problems of the Fauci-Wuhan-created SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which stupidly included all the problems of AIDS. Unless it’s not stupidly, but diabolically. Which is even worse. Bloody impostor!

It’s just more drugs, and MORE DRUGS, covering up one “error” with ONE MORE “ERROR”.

Or was this forseeable stuff ever an error to begin with? They KEEP DOING THE WRONG THING. OVER AND OVER. AGAIN AND AGAIN.

As you can see below, this hepatic shutdown action of ritonavir has a long list of potentially dire consequences, much like remdesivir, which is also basically a kidney and liver toxin.

I personally think this is all quite beyond suspicious as hell.

And after all of this crap, why that damned bureaucrat millionaire Fauci is still in his job is beyond me.

So there you have it.

Once you understand that they are selling the disease, the cure, and the cover-up, you can safely say that you want NONE OF THEM.

I want to see Anthony Fauci and Albert Bourla arrested and tried.

That’s what I want. We can talk about vaccines again after that happens.

Until that happens, I won’t take ’em. NOT A ONE.

W

Science vs. Anti-Science: Conservation of Spike Protein Biochemistry vs. Democrat Media Voodoo of Post-Pandemic Stress

As a young science student in the 1970s, I never would have thought that I would have to correct the American and global media over an issue of late 19th century basic science, but yet, here we are.

When basic theories of MATTER and CHEMISTRY proved that “Compound A created by one route has the same properties as compound A created by a different route”, science got a hold of a very simple but very revolutionary idea – that substances had assignable responsibilities for things. Further still, that we could PROVE THIS, and then use it in both diagnosis and cures.

This was the beginnings of the scientific theory of DRUGS and PHARMACEUTICALS.

I was PART OF THIS INDUSTRY. I learned about its history. I marveled at its beautiful truth.

But yet NOW – shamefully – to defend a corrupt pharmaceutical industry that literally controls our government, on behalf of other governments, our media will without shame DENY the most basic truths about how drugs and biochemicals work.

What is even MORE SHAMEFUL is that the global pharmaceutical industry KNOWS that I’m right – and yet in CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE, they allow the idiot media to defend them with insanity that THEY THEMSELVES swept away 150 years ago.

SO – what I am going to do here is to SHAME OUR MEDIA – our unscientific media – for embracing VOODOO theories of disease, as 150-year-old BASIC SCIENCE stares them in the face.

Let me begin by stating the bottom line right up front.

Anybody who thinks that cardiovascular pathology in recipients of spike protein vaccines is due to anything other than those very same spike protein antigens – which were BORROWED FROM THE DISEASE that causes the very same cardiovascular pathology – is denying the most basic science of drugs and disease.

Let me state that just a little MORE clearly.

It is impossible for vaccines to use a known molecular pathogen as an antigen, and NOT engender risk of pathogenicity due to that very same molecular pathogen.

Do you understand this?

If you take a poison to gain immunity to the poison, and you suffer poisoning typical of the poison, it was probably the poison, and probably not “stress”.

Good GOD – I cannot believe that I actually have to SAY THIS to adults in America in 2021, almost 2022.

But lets keep beating this into mushy skulls……

  • COVID-19 does bad cardiovascular things
  • COVID-19 virus has a spike protein
  • the spike protein is how COVID-19 does the cardiovascular bad things
  • the spike protein is how the vaccines “pretend” to be COVID-19
  • the spike protein by itself does the cardiovascular bad things
  • vaccines CREATING spike protein can thus do the cardiovascular bad things

This is actually very simple, because it’s OLD science.

Here is how we might play it out with the poisonous protein “ricin”.

  • ricin is a poisonous protein
  • we could try to make a vaccine against ricin, using ricin
  • we could give people an mRNA vaccine that “makes” ricin in their cells
  • the recipients would then have antibodies against ricin
  • some people who would get the vaccine would get ricin poisoning
  • the idea that the ricin poisoning was due to “stress” would be absurd

Are you starting to see this?

TO HYPOTHESIZE that GIVING a poison to a person, where the recipient then GETS poisoning typical of that poison, is not in fact RESPONSIBLE for causing the poisoning typical of the poison you just gave the person, is NUTS.

Actually, it’s beyond that – it’s NUCKING FUTS.

To hypothesize that there is some mysterious “stress” that causes EXPECTED SIDE EFFECTS from what we just gave the person, is so ridiculous, I could actually call upon the NIH to publicly CONDEMN major media for going along with this stuff – except for one thing.

The pharmaceutical companies that CONTROL the NIH AND the media are in fact the ones that make the poison and sell the product, and are trying to deny the obvious side effects of the poison.

WELL THAT’S GREAT.

Well, at least *I* spoke the truth.

Now – you may be wondering why I have not even pointed to a REFERENCE yet.

Well, not only is this stuff that EVERY college graduate should understand – MOST high school graduates should understand it, too.

In fact, anybody who has taken a fucking aspirin should understand this.

“If you take aspirin, and you have a side effect typical of aspirin, it was probably due to the aspirin, and not voodoo stress.”

This is SCIENCE. This is BASIC. FREAKING. SCIENCE.

It is SO basic, it is not in the literature. It is assumed that you understand this to even be able to begin to READ the scientific literature.

It is time to call people to account for these most basic things.

I want you to understand the following.

On honesty alone, I am more qualified to be the CEO of Pfizer than is Albert Bourla.

If Bourla does not explain this most basic truth to the people of the world, then he is a scientific FRAUD.

If Anthony Fauci does not explain this most basic truth to the people of the world, then he, too, is a scientific FRAUD.

I told you the truth. Bourla did not. Fauci did not.

Think about that.

W

Ref: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/explosion-new-heart-conditions-dismissed-post-pandemic-stress-disorder

Ref: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/04/uk-physicians-worried-about-large-numbers-of-cardiac-health-emergencies/

Dear KAG: 20211124 Open Thread

The author formerly known as ************ and now known as DePat is still being held away from this refuge of refuges by a combination of reluctant hardware and persnickety account software, but she is COMING SOON.

In the meanwhile, you may have to put up with “strange camel days”!!!

To quote DePat, “Back to camels next week” – and she was right!

WOLVES, TOO!!!

Two-legged and four-legged wolves do seem to get along!

Are you getting ready for the holidays?

Well, there’s ANOTHER ONE before that, but before we get to it, you need your MID-WEEK MESSAGE of a religious nature.

BEHOLD

Just in case anybody has any confusion about which side is “safer” to be on.

“Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.” Mark 13:31

And now, a message from……

LIBERTY

OK. Let’s cover some news.

“Colorado was able to flip nine school boards this year. We were able to get one of our leftists to resign and we also flipped our school board in the election,” Bishop said. “And people like me are considered domestic terrorists now, because we don’t stand for the policies that have been forced upon our children.”

WHO SAID THAT???

Yes. SHERRONNA BISHOP. HEROINE.

This was that woman who was “storm-troopered” by PERNICIOUS FIB.

For some great coverage of the OUTRAGEOUS story…..

So it begins: FBI raids home of mom who protested school board

But as we watch the Bidenazis [featuring Pavement Princess Pelosi, KAPO and FIB] going after parents, don’t forget what they continue to do to Trump’s supporters…..

Including Steve Bannon…..

This lady says that LISA MONACO is the OBAMA STOOGE who is really running these political partisan outrages out of Dodge and FIB.

I say we FRISK HER DIAPER for COMMUNIST BACKGROUND. Bet she’s double diaper of some sort.

Good GRIEF.

Had enough?

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MORE!

And did you know that LOOTING is a bad word? Hat Tip SUNDANCE for this one.

And now for a word from this site’s long-term scientific credibility sponsor, the CLOT SHOT.

A Shocking Study on Vaccine Rates and COVID-19 That You May Have Missed

LINK: https://pjmedia.com/columns/stacey-lennox/2021/10/28/a-shocking-study-on-vaccine-rates-and-covid-19-you-may-have-missed-n1527669

……and if you still aren’t shocked by MY interpretation of the results – “the vaccines are a total failure as a public health mitigation of the virus” – then just look at the title of the study.

Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States

European Journal of Epidemiology (2021)

LINK: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7

Does that not compute?

Try this one on for size…..

It makes that one LOOK GOOD.

Yes, The Vaccines Double the Overall Death Rate of Teens, Young Adults, and the Middle-Aged

I mean, they can try to explain this away, but until they do, which they won’t, because they can’t, you may want to think twice about vaccinating your kids.

Still not convinced?

Let’s roll out our friend (or at least acquaintance) Karl Denninger!

Want 11% -> 25% Heart Attack Risk?

Here is Denninger’s “killer quote” from the research paper on COVID vaccination effects on cardiac risk scoring.

A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

Let’s just add the title of the “sciencey” paper so that you really believe me.

Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

Steven R Gundry

Originally published

8 Nov 2021

Circulation. 2021;144:A10712

Seriously – read enough of this stuff, and Pseudo DePat here starts thinking that Reality DePat was BEYOND CORRECT in wanting to stay away from those Maskies and Vaxxies, otherwise known as the Traveling Clotberries, otherwise known as carriers of THE SHEDDING VACCINE.

Are you finally starting to see what’s going on?

Well, it’s time for some……

KARMA

…….on the people who criticized President Trump for “suggesting that people inject themselves with bleach“, because it turns out that…….

……does some VERY COOL STUFF which I’m going to explain.

Yeah – chlorine dioxide is that “Jordan Sather BLEACH” that Jordan actually explains rather nicely.

From there, go to this great scientific explanation of ClO2.

https://youtu.be/874zRsnVeC8

LINK: https://principia-scientific.com/chlorine-dioxide-the-secret-disinfectant/

Now – once you remove some of that fear, you can deal with THIS reality.

Doctors in several countries in Latin America TESTED the consumption of drinking water containing “medicinal levels” of chlorine dioxide against COVID-19.

Not only did these doctors do some science to see what happened – they used placebo controls. This was not double-blind due to ethical regulations – the doctors allowed people to pick pure water or ClO2 water.

Personally, I trust random Latinos over Fauci, but that’s just me.

Anyway, the doctors scientists in a Mexican study found that almost all symptoms of COVID were significantly reduced at days 7 and 14 by statistically valid amounts in the treated group.

And THIS most of all.

Remember how the CLOT SHOT, thanks to the SPIKE SNAKE PROTEIN, produces strong evidence of disseminated vascular MICRO-CLOTTING in the “D Dimer” test?

This was the crucial fact discovered by Dr. Charles Hoffe, in British Columbia. He found both the increase in a cardiovascular disease associated with vaccination, AND a likely mechanism for that disease increase.

Dr. Charles Hoffe’s Observation of Spike Protein mRNA Vaccine-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension

Well, COVID-19 itself does the exact same thing. Micro-clotting from the spike protein shows up in the D Dimer test as well.

And sure enough, chlorine dioxide SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED the D Dimer values of the group that took it.

NEATLY EXPLAINING the reduction in symptoms.

And WHY would it do that? If you watched the video with the German guy, he explained it – oxidative denaturing of the spike protein. But if you didn’t, then this OLD pre-COVID (2016) meme explains it, too.

Neutralizes proteins. Including, apparently, the spike protein.

Science. Its awesome. Even when it says that bleach works, and remdesivir doesn’t.

LINKS:

  1. https://beforeitsnews.com/eu/2021/11/biophysicist-andreas-kalcker-chlorine-dioxide-is-a-100-effective-cure-for-covid-2679383.html
  2. https://andreaskalcker.com/en/coronavirus/clinical-study-with-chlorine-dioxide/a-retrospective-observational-study-of-chlorine-dioxide-effectiveness-to-covid19-like-symptoms-prophylaxis-in-relatives-living-with-covid19-patients.html
  3. https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/downloads/science/cds.pdf
  4. https://www.theqtree.com/2021/09/16/remdesivir-is-how-we-bring-down-the-temple-of-faucism/
  5. https://www.theqtree.com/2021/09/24/nih-and-gilead-blamecasting-remdesivir-renal-toxicity-to-an-excipient/
  6. https://www.theqtree.com/2021/10/14/oan-hosts-amazing-anonymous-documentary-on-discovery-and-suppression-of-ivermectin-for-covid-and-how-gilead-and-fauci-gamed-a-remdesivir-study/
  7. https://www.theqtree.com/2021/09/20/the-murder-of-veronica-wolski-by-fauci-and-gileads-zyklon-d/

Very seriously, I’m not saying that I’m going to use chlorine dioxide if I get COVID-19, or whatever the next Chinese-Democrat bioweapon happens to be.

If my current disease immunity doesn’t work, but if ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine DO work, which they WILL if the Chinese-Democrat bioweapon happens to be a coronavirus, then I will likely use one of THOSE drugs.

Still, I can tell you in no uncertain terms, I would take chlorine dioxide long before I would take remdesivir, and probably before molnupiravir or paxlovid, as well.

Because I trust random doctors in Latin America over Fauci, Walensky, and Thalidomide Janet Woodcock.

And now I turn things back over to DePat.

Mostly.

Have a good day y’all.

(I don’t remember who brought this to a daily in the comments, but thanks.)

And, of course, the obligatory George Carlin:

Per the Boss (THAT BE ME!!!)

Let’s try one of Wolf’s favorite tunes, done a bit differently.

And now for the obligatory message from our sponsors:

Here at the Q tree we believe in the concept of CIVIL open free speech and the discussion that fleshes out ideas. When commenting and participating in the OPEN discussion on this thread all comments MUST NOT CONTAIN personal threats, baiting, name calling, or other anti-social words fomenting hate, violence or destruction. Our host Wolfm00n has strict rules about that.

Fellow tree dweller Wheatie gave us some good reminders on the basics of civility in political discourse:

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone

Please, stock up on blanks for celebratory gunfire, be ready to swing from the chandeliers…and no messing with the nuclear weapons.

Please remember to remain locked and loaded and ready for trouble should the insurrectionists try to invade your space.

Those who have things to say that do not fit the generally accepted limits of “civil” discussion, Wolf has provided a venue known as the UTree. You’re welcome to visit over there and say hi to anyone hanging out over there. The “Rescue Thread” is also over there. In the event a rendezvous of the tree is needed, please check it out, as well as the newest rescue venue.

Auntie DePat’s requests:

If you see something has not been posted, do us all a favor, and post it. Please, do not complain that it has not been done yet.

The scroll wheel on your mouse can be your friend. As mature adults, please use it here in the same manner you would in avoiding online porn.

Thank you so much for any and all attention to such details. It is GREATLY appreciated by more than one party here.

One other vital note:

Please, review these rules that our host Wolfm00n outlined toward the beginning of the growth of the tree itself. it won’t take long.

__________________________________________________

AND WE’RE DOUBLING DOWN ON THIS ONE!

MATTHEW 25:31-40

31“When the Son of man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. 32Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate them one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, 33and he will place the sheep at his right hand, but the goats at the left. 34Then the King will say to those at his right hand, `Come, O blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; 35for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, 36I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me.’ 37Then the righteous will answer him, `Lord, when did we see thee hungry and feed thee, or thirsty and give thee drink? 38And when did we see thee a stranger and welcome thee, or naked and clothe thee? 39And when did we see thee sick or in prison and visit thee?’ 40And the King will answer them, `Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brethren, you did it to me.’

“Do not be afraid to take a chance on peace, to teach peace, to live peace. Peace will be the last word of history” – St. Pope John Paul II

Holiness is this profound contact with God, becoming a friend of God: it is letting the Other work, the Only One who can really make the world both good and happy. — Benedict XVI

As always, prayers for the fight against that which seeks to enslave us are welcome.

Please include: President Donald Trump, the Q team, our soldiers in the field, special forces, tactical units, first responders and those working behind the scenes…and any and all people with family members in the hospital, COVID or not.

And this is me again, too! And it has NOT BEEN RESCINDED (although I should give you all an update at some point soon).

Wolf Moon

July 6, 2021 17:07
Thanking everybody for your patience. Whether happenstance, coincidence, or enemy action, I’m dealing with some technical issues. In addition to those, and the obvious spiritual attacks, I am dealing with the obvious site stuff in what are best maintained as unobvious ways.

I suspect we struck a nerve.

A combined technical / spiritual / strategic response by all of us will prevent this attack from succeeding. Hold the line – bite the bullet – gird the loins – bite the lip – pray for guidance, discernment, and strength – whatever YOU believe keeps the ship aright for the moment. Everything else is lower priority.

In that spirit, the Prayer to St. Michael the Archangel from Tuesday’s threads, and the Breastplate of St. Patrick, not to mention the Litany of Humility are favorites recommended by exorcists in spiritual warfare.

A Population Control Framework Based on Mandatory Vaccination is Now a Workable Substitute for Natural Disease Pressure

And we’ve got the data to prove it!

Notice that I’m not casting too much “blame” at the moment.

Taking the “pro” side here as a devil’s advocate is much more effective as a convincer, that the devil really is in the details.

And I’m tellin’ ya – THIS SHIT WORKS.

I mean, let me pretend to be a “depopper” here, albeit a rather stupid and unethical one, because there are much better ways – in all possible meanings of “better” – to reduce population.

But if I’m “that guy” for a moment…….

……then THIS SHIT IS AWESOME!!! And it WORKS LIKE CRAZY!!!

OK, back to “real Wolf”. For a little while.

We have the ultimate wheat/chaff sorter now.

If ANYBODY continues with the mandates, then they’re no good, and are worthy of immediate removal from power. Anybody who cared about the data in hand would stop the mandates.

If they don’t care, and push on, then it’s because they care about something else.

If they halt the mandates, there is redemption.

But if they don’t, then there is revolution and correction.

It’s THAT simple.

Let me explain.

1. The Entirely Predictable Population Effect of Nelsonian Bad Vaccines

Linda brought in a link to a STUNNED Gateway Pundit article, which links to a STUNNED Alex Berenson post, which links to STUNNING data from the UK Ministry of health.

Please click the GP and Berenson links at the very least. Those links will explain it fully.

Linda’s Comment: https://www.theqtree.com/2021/11/21/dear-maga-20211121/comment-page-1/#comment-832339

The Gateway Pundit: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/shocking-uk-study-stuns-medical-community-vaccinated-people-60-younger-twice-likely-die-unvaccinated-people/

Alex Berenson: https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/vaccinated-english-adults-under-60

UK Dataset: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

Now – HERE is the data that matters, in an EASY-TO-READ GRAPH.

What you are seeing here is that DEATH RATE among the vaccinated (ages 10-59 – NO ELDERLY – very important) ROSE RAPIDLY with the number of people vaccinated, until it was OVER TWICE as much as deaths among the unvaccinated – then slightly declined – slowly – to slightly UNDER twice the rate of deaths among the unvaccinated.

It’s not CAUSE, but it’s a CORRELATION THAT MATTERS.

The obvious argument that the other side will make here is that “people likely to die take the vaccine” – that it’s a self-selected group.

Well, let that argument be fought out, fair and square. There are many good ways to prove or at least implicate causation by vaccination, but I leave those as exercises.

But even if we accept that still very arguable premise, that dying people chose the vaccine, and don’t counter it by one of NUMEROUS arguments, then at the very least, the vaccine doesn’t seem to be making a huge difference in their greater likelihood of death. They’re still dying. If the vaccines we have now aren’t BAD, they’re at the very least something of a failure.

And the bottom line is STILL this.

For whatever reasons, and it doesn’t really matter which ones, in the aggregate, if you’re 10-59 and you’re vaccinated, you are more likely to die – about twice as likely – as somebody who doesn’t vaccinate.

Now, in MY opinion, that LONG DECLINE in the red VACCINATED line after it rises and FLIPS its relationship with the blue UNVACCINATED line, is very likely due to LEGITIMATE VACCINE HESITANCY.

When people started being vaccinated in great numbers, and then dying at a noticeably higher rate than the unvaccinated (LOOK at that PEAK), there was LEGITIMATE HESITANCY. People who SHOULDN’T get the vaccine, DIDN’T get the vaccine.

Do you see what I keep saying? Vaccine hesitancy is a METRIC OF SUCCESS OR FAILURE. It is not something you bargain with directly, IF YOU’RE HONEST.

Now, if you’re Rochelle Walensky or Anthony Fauci or Bill Gates, you claim that vaccine hesitancy is “bad”, but that’s silly. Vaccine hesitancy is a METRIC, and a metric is a metric. It is neither bad nor good, other than whether it’s bad or good as the metric it claims to be.

Hell – look at those results. If I’m right, VACCINE HESITANCY SAVED LIVES.

Unlike CDC and NIAID, which agencies continue to LIE and OBFUSCATE.

Now – you can see in the graph that this relationship has been known for MONTHS. But nobody has bothered to say that vaccine mandates, in light of that data, would appear to be a terrible idea, because if we’re WRONG about the “death group” being self-selected by anything OTHER than the fact that they took the vaccines, then……

…..DRUMROLL…..

…..OMG – IT’S THE VACCINES!!!

SO – until we know – we REALLY don’t need to be giving this vaccine to kids. WHILE it appears that the vaccine may be a health risk to those who don’t need it – AND KIDS DON’T NEED IT – there is no reason to BURN THAT CONTROL GROUP. And worse than that, there are all kinds of cost-benefit analyses that say giving the vaccine to kids is a BAD DEAL.

For a nice discussion of that, go HERE.

LINK: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/11/21/the-costs-of-inoculating-children-against-covid-19-far-outweigh-the-benefits/

I would go further and state that the vaccines themselves appear not to be a good idea for ANYBODY, but I’m willing to accept the proposition that “generally life-shortening vaccines that are beneficial for SOME PEOPLE deserve to exist, for the benefit of THOSE PEOPLE.”

But yet, people like the Napoleon of AIDS continue to pretend like nothing is wrong.

There is a WONDERFUL article by a WONDERFUL SKEPTIC – “The Ethical Skeptic” – a guy who doesn’t see the world exactly like I do – but who STILL hits the nail on the head about DECEPTION – BOTH OF SELF AND OF OTHER – which I find very useful. This person loves to point out all the ways people can be DISHONESTLY SKEPTICAL, or, alternatively, DISINGENUOUSLY IGNORANT.

Fauci is just RIGHT up this guy’s alley.

Here is the article you need to read about CULTIVATED IGNORANCE, STUDIED IGNORANCE, WILLFUL FAKE BLINDNESS, etc. My man TES even jumps on Wikipedia for WRONGLY classifying Nelsonian Knowledge and Nelsonian Inference as forms of Willful Blindness, which they are not.

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2019/03/07/nelsonian-inference-and-cultivated-ignorance/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/wZKYb

Once you see what Fauci and Walensky are doing, you can’t unsee it.

Now – let’s try to put this stunning little death statistic into a bigger picture.

2. Why Burning Control Groups is Essential if We Want to Create Artificial Population Control by Administered Disease Genes and Proteins

It’s pretty obvious that people (meaning individuals) don’t like disease, and vaccines are just a kind of “controlled disease” that we administer to ourselves to prevent “worse” disease. Vaccines are basically a way of bargaining with disease.

But do we trust those people to bargain for us?

Well, *I* don’t particularly trust them.

What we have here are people who are dead-set on vaccination as a solution to a problem THEY created. They are even more dead-set on MANDATORY vaccination – something which makes little sense in light of contraindications, which these same people rather remarkably declared DO NOT EXIST for one particular set of vaccines – which are in fact a set of really BAD vaccines, in terms of side effects. These people are rather remarkably unconcerned with the negative effects of those bad vaccines, which more than anything, seem to kill the people they are designed to save.

THAT last point is important, in an “artificial disease population control scheme”.

In other words, in the same way that these people seem to bargain for us in bad faith, they promote vaccines which bargain with disease in bad faith.

And here’s the kicker.

If, perchance, I was one of those people, and I wanted to HIDE our bad bargaining, and the bad bargain of the vaccines themselves, then one way to do it would be to insist on CONTROL of all study of the problem, and then – as part of that control – HIDE THE EVIDENCE.

Not to be distracted by the fact that the DOJ has also done this, but yeah.

So let’s take a look at HOW TO BURN CONTROL GROUPS.

The war on the ‘unvaccinated’ is a desperate attempt to demonize and destroy the control group

LINK: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/11/21/the-war-on-the-unvaccinated-is-a-desperate-attempt-to-demonize-and-destroy-the-control-group/

This gem of an article reminds us – in THEIR OWN WORDS – just how much we have been GASLIT by the “people in charge” about things, but more than that, this article explains why there has been such a push to get everybody vaccinated.

THAT – my friends – is not only how they get rid of the EVIDENCE – it’s how they get rid of the WITNESSES.

Once WE AS A WHOLE can’t really say if “natural immunity” would have been better, the ENTIRE WORLD ends up being “shanghaied” on a glorious communist voyage to HELL, where we trust our immunity, our lack of immunity, our side effects that they just deny, and our LITERAL POPULATION itself, to strangers who jab needles we don’t understand into our arms.

And THIS, under a system that controls our speech.

Sorry, I don’t like that deal.

So – now we get to the horrifying Part 3.

Seatbelts.

3. Let’s Make The Current Vaccines Even Better at Controlling Population

This is “facetious / not facetious”. I’m going to seriously address the problem, based on the excellent results reported by the UK, home of George Orwell. But no, I don’t actually like it. But I’m going to pretend a certain cheerful amorality for “effect”, as I take this where it’s all CLEARLY going.

OK???!!! AWESOME!!! *smiley*

Start with the current graph:

First of all, these are not the people that WE THE SOCIALISTS [ remember – I’m pretending – but I’m REALLY trying to be like them! ] want to eliminate. As socialists, we want to eliminate mostly older people, particularly those who no longer contribute as WE see fit, but not party members, or those who benefit the party. SO – unless the disease is showing such selectivity (see below), we need to have either vaccines which show the desired selectivity, or different vaccines for different people.

Thus, I’m only going to talk about the vaccines that lower life expectancy, NOT those that raise it. Assume that these excellent longevity-increasing vaccines WILL be available to party members.

We can derive a much better rate of death increase than a mere double of the unvaccinated rate, which has been obtained with the current vaccines. However, everybody has to be vaccinated, to hide what we’re doing. Again, some people will just get placebos, to maintain a secret control group, but there don’t have to be too many of them. Not enough that people notice. The controls will appear to be random people in the middle, somewhat more healthy than most, but not too healthy, helping to hide the healthy party members who get longevity-enhancing vaccines.

The disease we’re starting with is already rather remarkable in primarily killing people over 60 years old.

This was quality American/Chinese work, but we can do better!

If the disease itself can be crafted to be more deadly at 70+, and less so at 50-69, primarily by increasing lethality toward existing conditions which appear exclusively at advanced age, the curve will better approximate a step function that eliminates the costs of pensioners. It’s already really good, but making it too deadly too fast risks senior party members, even with “good” vaccines for those members.

So what is the solution?

Now – here is where vaccines make this even more efficient.

Removing MOSTLY old people gets the world population down SOMEWHAT, but there has to be a generally higher mortality of ALL AGE GROUPS until the population is balanced where the party wants it.

Thus, we can RAISE the mortality by the virus somewhat, but that is only an interim solution, until vaccines allow control down to the individual level.

Once worldwide compulsory vaccination is achieved, population reduction can focus on the individuals least compliant with and least amenable to socialism. They can be removed as quickly as feasible, making room for more compliant and useful individuals.

When vaccines are basically “the disease” – such as the current spike protein vaccines – then individuals will be unable to discern that their elimination is intentional. They can be told they have the disease, or the after-affects thereof, without evidence.

“Stubborn” individuals, where correction fails, can be removed quickly, using vaccines. Actual disease simply doesn’t allow that level of precision social control.

Based on compliance of current scientists, who depend on the state and the party to remain active in science, it is very unlikely that there will be objection to population control measures at that level. As long as no single individual knows too much, it is unlikely that understanding of population control will interfere with the process.

The KEY is universal mandatory vaccination, controlled by the state and the party. It’s the fastest and most assured route to a pure and permanent socialist state.

UGH. [ shakes off character ]

These people are SICK!!!

W

Why Was Pfizer-Wuhan Demanding Military Bases as Collateral for Vaccines?

Just askin’. I think it’s becoming obvious now.

Thanks to INDIA – which gets historic Chinese duplicity – for making me see the connection between Pfizer the company, which is fast becoming a CHINESE-based multinational, and what Pfizer is doing globally.

You see, I remember hearing from the VERY FIRST PFIZER WHISTLEBLOWER – who the treasonous media tried very hard to silence, if you will recall – that Pfizer was making all kinds of outrageous demands from different nations, in the contracts for its vaccine.

#PfizerLEAK

Stew Peters is doing great work. Sure he’s had some people on, in the past, who I was not terribly impressed with. Later, he had Jane Ruby on, with magnetic stuff that I believe is mostly disinformation. Sorry – not buying. The Magnetism Challenge: Part II – Scientific Disinformation During the COVID-19 Narrative Collapse Wherein …

One of the CRAZIEST demands was MILITARY BASES as collateral.

What in the HELL does Pfizer need with military bases? America might, but……

At the time, I was thinking “No WAY would America do that. It’s just so BLATANT.”

Well, I wasn’t thinking BIG ENOUGH.

Let’s follow this information back to the source from where I first got it.

First, Gab.

ricHARD Moriarity
@hardmasada
·

EXPLOSIVE REVELATION: Indian Television Exposes How Pfizer Bullies and Blackmails Countries for COVID Shots – “Desperate Countries force to Make Humiliating Concessions” (VIDEO) 
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/explosive-revelation-indian-television-exposes-pfizer-bullies-blackmails-countries-covid-shots-video/

does this sound like an American Co? No, this sound like a RED CHINESE conglomerate, so are they?

Pfizer Reserves the Right to Silence Governments – Pfizer is silencing the governments through its contracts. It has forced countries not to talk about the deals they strike for shots.

Pfizer Controls Distribution of Shots – Pfizer controls the donations of the shots, not the country that buys them. Pfizer will decide where the shots go.

Pfizer Secured an “IP Waiver” for Itself – If Pfizer is accused of intellectual property theft, governments will pay not the company.

Private Arbitrators, not Public Courts, Decide Disputes in Secret – If there are disputes, private arbitrators and not public courts will decide on them

Pfizer Can Go After State Assets – Pfizer can go after state assets to secure its compensation.

Pfizer Calls the Shots on Key Decisions – Pfizer decides delivery timeline and more.

EXPLOSIVE REVELATION: Indian Television Exposes How Pfizer Bullies and Blackmails Countries for COVID Shots (VIDEO)

WION Gravitas, a popular prime-time show in India that brings viewers news and discussions on concurrent issues and across the globe, exposed in a recent episode…

The Gateway Pundit

View Link Feed

4 likes
4 reposts

Then, the Gateway Pundit.

EXPLOSIVE REVELATION: Indian Television Exposes How Pfizer Bullies and Blackmails Countries for COVID Shots – “Desperate Countries force to Make Humiliating Concessions” (VIDEO)

November 1, 2021, 2:36pm

by J H.

There is a lot of GREAT information on the Gateway Pundit article, including sections of documents.

The video is HERE, on RUMBLE:

https://rumble.com/vokf3l-primetime-show-in-india-exposes-how-pfizer-bullies-and-blackmails-countries.html

It is imperative to remember that Pfizer now has a HUGE operation in……

…..WAIT FOR IT…..

WUHAN, HUBEI, CHINA

Yeah, that’s right.

Conveniently close to where some of the vaccine components come from, I might add, per former Pfizer employee and second whistleblower Karen Kingston.

EXPLANATORY LINK HERE

It turns out that the Pfizer Wuhan operation was nicely exposed in an article back in July of this year.

One of the things you will note as you read the article, is that there was indeed some effort to cover up Pfizer having a huge research center at the epicenter of the outbreak of the disease that they are making so much money on, thanks to the outbreak.

Funny, that.

LINK: https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2021/07/22/pfizer-has-large-rd-facility-in-wuhan-china-pfizer-employed-members-of-the-chinese-communist-party-according-to-a-data-leak-pfizer-3-month-revenue-from-the-covid-vaccine-was-3-5-billion/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/AQwcc

Pfizer December 2020 SEC filing: https://archive.md/SMPQa

[WOLF NOTE: I am just including SOME of the great research from this article to give you a taste.]

In 2010, Pfizer founded an R&D facility at China’s National Bio-industry Base in Wuhan (Biolake). By 2015, Pfizer was moving its “medicine safety business” from India to the Wuhan Biolake facility. Lan Zhanghua, the site head of Pfizer (Wuhan) Research & Development Co Ltd. stated in 2016: “Every one of Pfizer’s new drugs has indispensable contributions from the Wuhan team.“ He states that two R&D “functions run exclusively at Wuhan and nowhere else in the world… our Wuhan teams manage the clinical trial registry information and clinical trial master files for all Pfizer’s medicines”. https://archive.md/puanr Pfizer should be under investigation by the FBI-Homeland Security, but they almost certainly are not.

According to a data leak, Pfizer has employed 69 known members of the Chinese Communist Party. This sounds like a low number, considering that around 500 people work at their Wuhan site. Maybe this is members working for Pfizer outside China? See: “Huge Data Leak of 2 Million CCP Members Reveals ‘Golden Age’ of Chinese Espionage” By Daniel Y. Teng, December 14, 2020 https://archive.vn/5O49L

Pfizer is one of the major beneficiaries of SARS-CoV 2 (Covid-19), which started in Wuhan, China: “Pfizer Reaps Hundreds of Millions in Profits From Covid Vaccine: The company said its vaccine generated $3.5 billion in revenue in the first three months of this year”, New York Times, May 4, 2021: https://archive.md/l6Sy1. It accounted for almost a quarter of Pfizer’s total revenue and they will make close to an estimated $1 billion in vaccine profits for the first three months alone. (NYT estimate is $900 million pretax.)

“The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine” for Covid-19. Notice that they don’t put “death” as one of the risks. They merely note that “These may not be all the possible side effects of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials”. This is not informed consent! https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download

As of December 2020, Pfizer’s SEC filing still listed the following subsidiaries in Communist China, which carries the false name of “People’s Republic of China”: Pfizer (China) Research and Development Co. Ltd, Pfizer (Wuhan) Research and Development Co. Ltd., and Pfizer Biologics (Hangzhou) Co. Ltd., as well as Pfizer International Trading (Shanghai) Limited, Pfizer Investment Co. Ltd., Pfizer Pharmaceutical (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Pfizer Finance Share Service (Dalian) Co., Ltd. https://archive.md/SMPQa Funny thing that the Wuhan R&D isn’t listed as one of their R&D locations on the Pfizer web site. Even prior to the Covid-19 outbreak, it wasn’t listed: https://web.archive.org/web/20190321054103/https://www.pfizer.com/science/research-development/centers If you do a search for Wuhan on their web site, you don’t find it, as of this writing. If you type China in the search you find some relevant things.

On a separate Pfizer (China) site (last updated in 2011) one can find regarding Pfizer’s China Research and Development Center (Shanghai and Wuhan): “CRDC supports Pfizer’s global biological and chemical pharmaceutical R&D programs across our clinical development pipeline, and serves as an important hub of Pfizer global and Asia-Pacific R&D activities. As such, CRDC is an integral part of Pfizer’s global R&D site network, providing support across many R&D disciplines, including clinical drug development, medical, regulatory and safety.” See this and more here: https://archive.md/IQBZy

Pfizer founded an R&D facility in Wuhan (October 8, 2010) at China’s National Bio-industry Base in Wuhan (Biolake). It was the first Fortune 500 company to located at Wuhan’s Biolake facility. By 2015, Pfizer was moving its “medicine safety business” (whatever that means) from India to the Wuhan Biolake facility.

Lan Zhanghua site head of Pfizer (Wuhan) Research & Development Co Ltd. stated: “We developed beyond expectation. Now the Wuhan team has comprehensive coverage in Pfizer’s medicine development. Every one of Pfizer’s new drugs has indispensable contributions from the Wuhan team.“

Whereas, Pfizer’s Wuhan team started “performing only one function to 12 functions in the R&D system. Two functions run exclusively at Wuhan and nowhere else in the world: ‘No other but our Wuhan teams manage the clinical trial registry information and clinical trial master files for all Pfizer’s medicines. These are of utmost importance – making any mistake or losing documents could mean the medicine would never go to market,’ Lan said.”

As of 2016, Pfizer employed almost 500 people at the Wuhan site.

MORE

I’m gonna be blunt.

THIS was not a good look for those who have gotten in bed with Pfizer.

Just sayin’.

First, this little bit of very phony salesmanship. Good grief, Israel. To SHILL for vaccines.

The world is no longer full of IDIOTS who fall for “patent medicine shows” like this.

Now check this out.

Note the part about vaccinating KIDS.

They’re EAGER. Long before Rochelle Alinsky was talking about it here in the US.

MORE

It is now VERY clear that the spike protein vaccines were a case of “designed obsolescence”. They were designed to peter out with spike variation, and to not give the same superior, robust “natural” immunity that the disease gives, through nucleocapsid antibodies.

THAT enables MORE CLOT SHOTS. More “abortion vaccines”. MORE population control.

At the same time the “vaccines” enforce inferior immunity, the spike was the first step toward cutting back human longevity. Population reduction through incrementally distributed disease.

It’s a SELF-FUNDING DEPOPULATION PROGRAM.

The most diabolical form of “smallpox blankets” ever devised. Distributed to all of humanity.

Corporate and Political Elite Gather at COP26 To Discuss How The Global Population Destroying The Planet – An Ideological Motive to Deploy a Mandatory Vaccine To Eliminate Human Lifespans

November 1, 2021 | Sundance | 572 Comments

The American government, the Israeli government, and Pfizer may be friends, but they are no longer OUR friends.

Know your real friends are.

Know who tells the truth, and make THEM your friends.

W

The Clot Shot, The Explanation Thereof, And The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand

I. The Clot Shot

First things first.

Nobody would be calling ALL of the various full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein vaccines “the clot shot” if there weren’t some clear and obvious problems with the full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein ITSELF.

We already know that clotting dysfunction is key to COVID-19 pathogenicity. SO – it’s not exactly a surprise that the spike protein itself, and likewise the S1 subunit of that protein – a.k.a. THE BUSINESS END – are themselves pathogenic.

EXAMPLE:

Spike Protein S1 Subunit as Direct Lung Pathogen

LINK 1: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34156871/

LINK 2: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384477/

In the above example, the S1 subunit of the spike protein was basically 100% lethal to humanized mice when applied to their lungs.

And when they looked at the mice, the damage was basically the same as the damage from COVID-19.

Just sayin’.

So let me now TEST you, and see if you’re more of a scientist than Fauci’s protege Rochelle Alinsky – WHOOPS – I mean Rochelle Walensky – who heads the CDC for Fauci to maintain control of it.

If you give a SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE to somebody, and they have symptoms of COVID-19 during the next few days, or even during the next two weeks, which scenario is more likely?

(A) – The person just happened to get real COVID-19, and THAT spike protein did BAD THINGS.

(B) – The spike protein you put inside the person did BAD THINGS.

Do you see how science works?

It’s a lot like common sense, only it’s applied to fancy stuff.

I want you to meet some great scientists here. These are people with very little scientific authority, but they simply practiced science, instead of repeating what authorities told them.

(1) – The CNA who would not accept “super-spreader” myths

This guy was one of the first people to administer the Pfizer vaccine to nursing home residents.

He was shocked that his nursing home residents would die shortly after being vaccinated – after having survived for months BEFORE the vaccine – in a way that was clearly related to their being vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine.

Nursing home management would NOT admit to the obvious connection – and created a mythical “super-spreader” to explain the deaths.

This man is a HERO.

The first 10 minutes of the video is this man working up the courage of conscience – to SPEAK THE TRUTH. If you just want to hear what he needed to say, you can jump to 10 minutes and you will hear the SCIENCE.

LINK 1: https://rumble.com/vdaicp-cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-inj.html

LINK 2: https://www.bitchute.com/video/cpQ7dnqu0Sos/

LINK 3: https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-injections-speak-out/

LINK 4: https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-injections-speak-out/

(2) – From Physician’s Assistant to VAERS Whistleblower

This lady, a hospital physician’s assistant, started out as a “COVID training true believer”, but she began observing what the shots were doing in her hospital. From there, she began encountering resistance to “doing the right thing”.

Now, in retrospect, you can see everybody in the system avoiding responsibility – not just for the problem, but for even reporting it.

A fantastic interview by Del Bigtree’s Highwire show.

LINK 1: https://thehighwire.com/videos/these-patients-deserve-to-be-heard-vaers-whistleblower/

LINK 2: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/17/physicians-asst-whistleblower-reveals-hospital-intake-with-90-percent-vaccinated-patients-and-hospital-administration-refusing-to-report-adverse-events/

(3) – Doctor Discovers Disseminated Clotting in Most Vaccinated Patients

We covered this just recently, HERE.

Dr. Charles Hoffe’s Observation of Spike Protein mRNA Vaccine-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension

This doctor discovered not only that “the jab” was leading to loss of wind (reduced effort tolerance) in too many of his patients – a whopping 62% of all his patients were showing signs of microscopic clotting – similar to COVID-19 – after vaccination.

LINK:  https(colon)//www.bitchute(dot)com/video/A6GbcUl6blpJ/

Bibliography of our own Spike Protein Suspicions

Now – this site has also not been negligent in reporting on the problems of the “clot shot”, as you can see from the following bibliography.

Are Clotting Problems a General Minor Risk of COVID Vaccines?
Is The Abortion Vaccine Right For You?
Keeping COVID Shot Transfer Out Of Your Life
Five* Studies Showing the Potential or Actual Superiority of Disease-Conferred Immunity in COVID-19
How Vaccine Addiction Slavery Works
They’re Nazis
Interview With A Victim of Jab-Haul COVID
Spike Protein = Spike Protein ≈ Snake Protein
The Spike Protein’s Purpose Betrayed By Its Own Superiority
Dr. Charles Hoffe’s Observation of Spike Protein mRNA Vaccine-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension
Why All People Must Refuse mRNA Vaccines to End the Worldwide Gain of Function Experiment

Thus, you will see that we were READY when a good explanation of the clot shot arose.

II. The Explanation

I want to start by thanking barkerjim for posting a comment with a link that leads to a very recent paper (pre-peer-review, of course) that explains the clot shot. He found the link HERE on Denninger’s Market Ticker site.

The order of the finding:

Denninger Comment: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=3724148

Q Tree Comment: https://www.theqtree.com/2021/10/18/dear-kmag-20211018-joe-biden-didnt-win-%e2%9d%80-open-topic/comment-page-2/#comment-816737

Ecosophia Comment: https://ecosophia.dreamwidth.org/152821.html?thread=20225013#cmt20225013

Preprint Paper: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.12.464152v1.full.pdf

I will include the entirety of the anonymous comment on the Ecosophy blog.

Spike Protein Clotting Mechanism

Date: 2021-10-14 06:10 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Preprint posted today. This is potentially a bombshell paper.

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces abnormal inflammatory blood clots neutralized by fibrin immunotherapy

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.12.464152v1.full.pdf

“Here we report that the Spike protein from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) binds to the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and induces structurally abnormal blood clots with heightened proinflammatory activity. SARS-CoV-2 Spike virions enhanced fibrin-mediated microglia activation and induced fibrinogen-dependent lung pathology. COVID-19 patients had fibrin autoantibodies that persisted long after acute infection.”

“The central structural component of blood clots, and a key regulator of inflammation in disease, is insoluble fibrin, which is derived from the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and is deposited in tissues at sites of vascular damage (10, 11). Hypercoagulability in COVID-19 is associated with inflammation and the formation of fibrin clots resistant to degradation despite adequate anticoagulation (3-5). Extensive fibrin deposits are detected locally in inflamed lung and brain tissues from COVID-19 patients, sometimes without evidence of direct viral infection at autopsy (1, 8, 12-14). The high prevalence of thrombotic events with these unique hypercoagulability features suggests an as yet unknown mechanism of abnormal blood clot formation in COVID-19. We set out to determine how blood clots form in COVID-19 and to identify therapies to combat the deleterious effects of abnormal coagulation occurring in acute and convalescent stages of disease.”

“Since hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients has features distinct from those of other inflammatory diseases, we hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 directly affects the structural and functional properties of blood clots. Incubation of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant trimeric spike protein (Spike) with healthy donor plasma increased fibrin polymerization (Fig. 1A). Spike strikingly altered the fibrin clot structure resulting in thinner fibers with a rough appearance and increased clot density as shown by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Fig. 1B, fig. S1), identifying direct effects of SARS-CoV-2 Spike on fibrin clot architecture. Consistent with these structural changes, a solid-phase binding assay revealed binding of Spike to both fibrinogen and fibrin (Kd 5.3 μM and 0.4 μM, respectively) (Fig. 1C). Fibrinogen immunoprecipitated with full-length recombinant trimeric Spike, and studies with deletion mutants identified an interaction with the S2 domain of Spike (Fig. 1D, fig. S2).”

“Intravenous administration of Spike PVs in wild-type (WT) mice induced extensive fibrin deposition in the lung (Fig. 2A). (…) Fibrin deposition was associated with activated endothelium in the lung, and gene expression analysis revealed increased expression of endothelial and inflammatory markers in Spike PV-injected mice (…) consistent with findings of SARS-CoV-2 toxicity to endothelial cells (19). (…) Mice genetically-deficient in fibrinogen (Fgα–/– mice), which express all other blood proteins except fibrinogen and are protected from autoimmune and inflammatory conditions (11), did not exhibit lung pathology following Spike PV challenge (Fig. 2E, fig. S5).”

“Fibrinogen is causally linked to the activation of macrophages and microglia in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in the brain and periphery (11, 21). Fibrin is a driver of microglia-induced cognitive dysfunction (22) and is associated with perivascular-activated microglia and macrophages in brains of COVID-19 patients even without signs of infection (12).”

“A surge of autoantibody production against diverse immune targets have been detected in COVID-19 patients (25). To determine whether COVID-19 patients develop autoantibodies
against abnormal blood clots, we tested autoantibody responses to fibrin. (…) We tested longitudinally collected serum samples ranging from acute to convalescent disease stages from 54 COVID-19 asymptomatic, mild, and severe disease patients requiring
admission to the intensive care units (table S3). Fibrin autoantibodies were abundant in all three groups of COVID-19 patients and persisted during the convalescent stage, but were scarce in healthy donor controls or in subjects with non-COVID respiratory illnesses (Fig. 4A, B).”

“In summary, we find that SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein enhances the formation of highly
inflammatory clots that are neutralized by a fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody. Our data shed
new light on the enigmatic coagulopathy found in COVID-19 revealing a causal role for fibrinogen
in thromboinflammation – even independent of active viral replication. The high incidence of clotting complications in COVID-19 has been attributed to systemic inflammation (3), vascular damage including abnormal levels of circulating coagulation proteins (1, 26), genetic susceptibility to tissue factor and complement genes (27), and prothrombotic autoantibodies (28). Our findings now show that coagulopathy is not merely a consequence of inflammation. Rather, the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 Spike with fibrinogen and fibrin results in abnormal blood clot formation that in turn drives inflammation.”

[ THIS HERE IS THE PART TO READ ]

Assuming the results are correct – and I can see little reason to doubt them though replication is always important – this really starts to put the puzzle pieces together. I’m frankly amazed that it took so long to figure this out.

In less-scientific language:

1. The spike protein binds directly to fibrinogen, the protein precursor of fibrin which forms blood clots.

2. This binding causes the fibrinogen to polymerize to form fibrin strands, thus forming clots.

3. Spike binding to fibrin in clots also changes the clot structure and renders it resistant to degradation.

4. Fibrin induces immune inflammation. This is usually adaptive because clotting occurs at sites of injury. It is dangerous when it occurs in response to diffuse and extensive spike-mediated micro-clotting. This helps to explain the runaway immune-mediated inflammatory response characteristic of severe Covid-19.

5. Spike *alone* (in the absence of an infectious virus) induces fibrin deposition and inflammation in the lungs of mice. However, mice lacking the gene for fibrinogen exhibited no pathology upon spike exposure, demonstrating that the fibrinogen-spike interaction is necessary and sufficient for spike-induced pathology.

6. Fibrin induces cognitive dysfunction via immune inflammation in the brain.

7. Many recovered Covid-19 patients have abundant autoantibodies against fibrin – independent of disease severity – while these autoantibodies are rare in unexposed people. This indicates both that spike-mediated fibrin formation is occurring in the course of actual human infection, and that autoreactive antibodies are formed which may play a role in chronic/long-haul symptoms or prolonged clotting problems.

8. A fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody greatly reduced inflammation, suggesting a potential new route for disease treatment.

The paper never uses the word “vaccine” – a glaring and clearly intentional omission – but it should be obvious based on these findings that instructing the body to produce large amounts of spike protein on multiple occasions is a dangerous prospect, and it also explains those autopsy revelations of bodies full of clots.

One caveat: The coordinating author is working with a start-up company to develop treatments based on reducing fibrin-mediated inflammation, so there is clearly some commercial interest here that could be influencing objectivity. On the other hand, it is often the entrepreneurial think-outside-the-box types who end up making groundbreaking discoveries.

Mark L

[ BOOM!!! ]

This is AMAZING and powerful work.

Remember that scientific paper that we started this article with?

NOW we know exactly how that happens. See how the SCIENCE is all connecting together?

The commenter on Ecosophia makes TWO critical points.

POINT ONE is that vaccines are never mentioned. That is how this work will eventually be published. The Rochelle Alinsky CDC could STOP the paper as potentially causing “vaccine hesitancy” if the authors mentioned vaccines, but by throwing no stones, none bounce back.

The CDC will still likely DELAY this from being published for as long as they can. But by avoiding mention of vaccines, the paper cannot be scuttled on the grounds that it “might cause vaccine hesitancy”, which is the FALSE IMPERATIVE that the CDC socialists use to control science and force vaccines on us as a social sabotage. Instead, the READER can make the connections and understand the implications for vaccines.

Do you see why PREPUBLICATION COMMUNICATIONS (like this one) are now so important?

POINT TWO is that it’s JUST THE SPIKE PROTEIN – NOT THE VIRUS AS A WHOLE – that causes the problems. And it’s been PROVEN. And it’s been PROVEN that THIS is the mechanism of the problems induced by the spike protein.

The moniker of “CLOT SHOT” is literally proven to be correct.

This is a BOMBSHELL because it indicts the entire concept of full-length spike protein vaccines as fundamentally flawed. It indicts mRNA vaccines as even more flawed than antigen, because the amount of toxic spike protein is unregulated. (Notice that I’ve been saying this all along.) It doesn’t necessarily say that other types of vaccines (like RBD subunit antigen vaccines) are any safer than spike protein antigen vaccines, but they MIGHT BE.

Something even BETTER here, than just the fibrinogen mechanism, is the way that this EXPLAINS (point 4 above) what one nurse practitioner observed – that COVID strikes PRE-EXISTING INFLAMMATION. Both the WHY of some people having severe COVID and others not, and the LOCATION of those issues, is explained by fibrin’s ties to pre-existing inflammation. We now have a mechanism which we already know follows that rule, because that’s how fibrin works.

This also explains why antihistamines work to save people from severe COVID. Antihistamines are generally useful against severe inflammation by pathogenic substances which cause inflammatory reactions. It’s why they administer benadryl as a general emergency antiinflammatory for purposes like anaphylaxis prevention.

The Zyrtec Rebellion

Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …

And yet the CDC has WARNED people against taking antihistamines with the vaccine – when this work LITERALLY PROVES WHY THAT IS A GOOD STRATEGY – just as it is a good strategy to take antihistamines to protect against severe COVID.

Like I said, this study proves THAT we were right, and WHY we were right.

And why is CDC so WRONG – time and time again?

This is a breaker of logjams. The insistence on the use of a fundamentally flawed vaccine is CRIMINAL.

Mandates are bad enough, but over a vaccine, the very principle of which is scientifically proven as DANGEROUS?

If mandates continue, these people need to be in JAIL. If they RESIST, they need to be OVERTHROWN.

In short, THIS.

https://twitter.com/TheJuggernaut88/status/1450593202050715655

Mandating this fundamentally dangerous vaccine is so wrong on so many levels.

This is a EUGENIC VACCINE if there ever was one. It’s almost DESIGNED to finish off people who are not 100% healthy.

How can this be right? Seriously. How can this be right?

We can no longer tolerate these people who pretend not to know.

III. The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand

I start this section by thanking three people – Sundance, Aubergine, and Trumpismine – who helped me to see what is going on here.

SUNDANCE informed me of the “Mamet Principle” – that liberals pretend not to know things

AUBERGINE formulated her wonderful Razor – that it is dangerous to dismiss such pretense as mere stupidity, when it might be the product of malice or guile.

TRUMPISMINE turned me on to the Wikipedia definition of Lysenkoism, which contained enough detail that I was able to connect the goals of old Lysenkoism to the actions of the left today.

The so-called Mamet Principle is a paraphrase of a repeated point by David Mamet, which Sundance encapsulated as a principle. This has been discussed and exemplified many times, both here and on CTH.

In asking WHY liberals “pretend not to know things”, we now understand that Hanlon’s Razor is an EXCUSE – that it’s COVER – and that it’s NOT because they’re STUPID, but rather because they’re smart and evil.

The best and most concise description is a reworking of Hanlon’s Razor by our own Aubergine.

So what if we apply this to Saint Fauci of Antibodies?

Anthony Fauci has a literal MAGICIAN’S POWER to make people focus on the WRONG THING. His skills of EVASION are absolutely outstanding. I love to call it “antibody hypnosis”, because that is exactly what it seems like.

“YOU WILL LOOK AT THE ANTIBODIES. THE ANTIBODIES WILL SAVE YOU. LOOK ONLY AT THE ANTIBODIES. YOU ARE FEELING WARM. YOU ARE FEELING SAFE. YOU ARE HAPPY ABOUT THE ANTIBODIES. THE MORE ANTIBODIES YOU SEE, THE WARMER YOU FEEL – LIKE THE SUN ON YOUR FACE ON A BEACH.”

You even hear his voice when you read that – don’t you? That gravelly, reassuring voice.

It’s VERY intentional.

Focusing on ONE WRONG THING – or even ONE RIGHT THING – is a technique of misdirection, but it is one of the BEST ways of pretending not to know things.

“Let’s only talk about this.”

Rand Paul knows all about it. He has gone many rounds with the Fauci critter.

But it’s not just Fauci.

His protege in CDC, who gives Fauci effective control of medical science, is every bit as bad.

It even includes Rand Paul’s colleagues in Congress.

The man behind the launch of censorship. Is this guy even AMERICAN?

What a PUTZ.

ANYWAY, this is where I started to figure things out.

This WEIRD LOVE of the radical left for brutal, aggressive, stupid, uncaring science – where does it come from?

I did not expect the answer that I found, with the help of Trumpismine and Wikipedia.

Lysenkoism

LINK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

It’s very helpful to read this, including this part:

Marxism–Leninism postulated “universal and immutable laws of history” (historical materialism and dialectical materialism), which assumed unavoidable large-scale change at the collective level of societies.[5]Collectivism was a key feature of Marxism; Darwin’s concept of a random mutation in an individual being able to propagate and transform subsequent generations was at odds with the ideology, and was perceived as having a strong liberal inclination.[6] Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]

Most people brought up in mainstream, establishment, Western science use the term Lysenkoism without really understanding the political angle of it. We understand it merely as “politics being imposed on scientists in the Soviet Union, which set back Soviet biological science by decades.”

Yes, that’s true, but it’s not ALL of the truth. The more you know about it, the more it looks EXACTLY like “Woke Science”.

As an aside, clearly it makes sense WHY China (and to a lesser extent Russia) would want to promote Lysenkoism in the United States, as part of their own interests. “China First” and “Russia First” by socialist and ex-socialist means are unlikely to be pretty. “Fuck the other guy up so he can’t win” is a valid technique in a corrupt world.

But it goes deeper.

Lysenkoism is far less about being STUPID, than about being REVOLUTIONARY. That is a critical idea. That quality of being revolutionary makes mistakes, and when it does, it’s generally STUPID. But when it does NOT make mistakes, it’s generally EVIL.

Let me repeat what I said, earlier about Lysenkoism.

[QUOTE]

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Online Admin Coyote Reply to  trumpismine October 18, 2021 02:36

This is EXCELLENT READING!!!

You know what? This is actually really interesting reading.

In a WEIRD WAY – Lysenko was “right”, in that he maniacally predicted EXACTLY what the communists are doing NOW with gene therapy. His assertion of a “genetic dialectic” – of the “evolutionary” in conflict with the “revolutionary” – is actually what we’re seeing RIGHT NOW with the “natural evolution” crowd (US) versus the commie-forced gene therapy crowd (THEM).

Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]

It was just total hubris and pathological commie science – a lot like what we see from Fauci, Gates and Walensky – but it “anticipated” what WOULD come eventually through science – that someday WE would have the power to do the things – and make the mistakes – that we are making now.

So in many ways these people ARE the intellectual inheritors of Lysenkoism!!!

Lysenko’s mistake was claiming that things WERE what they merely COULD BE through greater understanding.

Imagine some person coming BEFORE Galileo and trying to FORCE heliocentrism in their country – killing, jailing, ousting, and attacking the geocentrists.

In a sense, that was Lysenko, who attacked natural evolution.

Natural processes are “evolution”.

Genetic modification is “revolution”.

The dude was a NUT, trying to assert that the NATURAL was both, when it’s almost all ONE. But if he would have simply said “We must become revolutionary in genetics, which is merely evolutionary now”, then he would have been like the Lenin of biology, and he would likely be admired today by all these crazy leftists and depoppers, instead of an old Soviet embarrassment.

But ALL OF THAT comes back and tells me that these people are the modern recapitulation of Lysenkoist THOUGHT, but using the GAINS of actual evolutionary understanding.

The nutbaggery we see NOW with the communist jab-maniacs, is just like Lysenko’s assertions, only MORE REAL because they have MORE TECH.

[END QUOTE]

Soviet science, and Lysenko in particular, were characterized by a kind of VIRTUE SIGNALING, and that is what we are seeing now on universities, only it tends to be about peripheral things, like race, diversity, gender – whatever is in leftist vogue.

But NOW, in our phony socialist “pandemic”, we are seeing the virtue signals rise to levels that affect the practice of science itself. It’s starting at GOALS, but very soon, it will get a bit like CLIMATE LYSENKOISM, where people CHANGE DATA, HIDE DATA, DROP EVIDENCE, and basically act like MAINSTREAM MEDIA JOURNALISTS, who are in a continuous state of covering things up by omission, distraction, and promotion of contradicting narratives.

That is NOT GOOD.

I think that we are now seeing with publications like the one featured in this article, is some PUSH-BACK by scientists who realize where things are headed – a VERY BAD place. They are GETTING THE TRUTH OUT.

We need to help promote awareness of science that CDC and the communist infiltration are going to hide.

W

On August 7, 1948, at the end of a week-long session organised by Lysenko and approved by Stalin,[14] the V.I. Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences announced that from that point on Lysenkoism would be taught as “the only correct theory.” Soviet scientists were forced to denounce any work that contradicted Lysenko.[19] Criticism of Lysenko was denounced as “bourgeois” or “fascist,” and analogous “non-bourgeois” theories also flourished in other fields such as linguistics and art in the Soviet academy at this time. Perhaps the only opponents of Lysenkoism during Stalin’s lifetime to escape liquidation were from the small community of Soviet nuclear physicists: as Tony Judt has observed, “It is significant that Stalin left his nuclear physicists alone and never presumed to second guess their calculations. Stalin may well have been mad but he was not stupid.”[20]

Faucism-Lysenkoism is real. And it’s HERE.

Dr. Charles Hoffe’s Observation of Spike Protein mRNA Vaccine-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension

A Beautiful Demonstration of Real Science in Action, and How Political Correctness Prevents Obvious Correlations and Causations From Being Seen by Monetarily Dependent Scientists

Being “Sherlock Holmes” is easy, when everybody else in mainstream science has turned into a character from “The Muppets” or “Sesame Street”.

Except for Dr. Charles Hoffe, plus a bunch of other physicians and scientists who our media calls “The Dirty Dozen”, that “Count” guy is my only real competition now.

Of course, when he counts 57 genders, he will leave our little group of truth-tellers, but until then he can probably count protons and neutrons reliably.

Thankfully, I’m retired. I can speak the truth. “The Count” is still employed by the dirty establishment.

Consider a basic idea of vaccination known from literally centuries of science – from even BEFORE the first vaccination in the 1790s, when people used WEAKENED smallpox to gain immunity to NORMAL smallpox (a process called “inoculation” or “variolation”).

Here is that bedrock idea. A principle so simple, it borders on “an obvious trend in a collection of observations”.

“Immunity conferred by catching a disease naturally and recovering is strong, and any form of preventing the disease by inoculation (including variolation and vaccination) attempts to live up to that level of immunity. Some vaccines will give life-long immunity, if that is possible, or for as long as the disease itself gives immunity, if lucky, but in many if not most cases, the durability of immunity conferred by a vaccine is LESS than the durability of immunity conferred by the disease itself.”

So I repeat – this simple idea is something that “everybody knew” from roughly 1790 to 2019, and even before 1790, when vaccination wasn’t even called vaccination.

But then – suddenly – in 2020, the media talked us out of centuries of knowledge about how immunity works, by a kind of hand-waving authority – allegedly from “the experts” at CDC and NIH.

Fauci and Scarf Lady went along with the media hoax. They didn’t have to say a lot. It was mostly by leaving OPEN the question of natural immunity, when it should NOT have been left open, that damage to science and society was done.

Of course, after enough results poured in from laboratories around the world, noting how much stronger natural immunity to COVID-19 appeared to be, we were relieved to discover that – Yes, Virginia – immunity is still behaving just like it did before COVID-19.

(The feds will certainly have to do some “funding mechanics” to fix all those people reporting “incorrect science”, won’t they?)

And THAT is when Rand Paul began taking Anthony Fauci to the woodshed over natural immunity.

So why the heck did we ever suspect or believe otherwise?

No good reason, except the Fake News.

Think about it.

If this does not prove to you that the media controls science, and not the other way around, then wait for the next example.

I’m going to replay parts of a conversation some of us has on October 1 of this year.

It’s in images, but I will also provide a link and the text.

Focus on Tonawanda’s friend.

LINK: HERE

Now, I will include the text as well. This is the ENTIRE conversation after the initial post, including additional participants.

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine October 1, 2021 11:19

I now know two people personally who get the injection. One was my BIL who got covid anyway, but we made sure he got treated the right way and he got better immediately, and is back at full health despite diabetes.

The other is a friend who cannot breath well even with an oxygen tank turned to max. He has seen every type of doctor, and no one can figure out what the problem is.

He and I had a sharp but friendly argument over the injections a month or so ago. He is MAGA but a true “vax” believer (hard to imagine, but they exist).

I have spoken to him a couple times at length, but refrained from bringing up the injection as a possible cause of his present distress. His wife thinks he is not going to make it, but, again, I have not mentioned to her the injection as a consideration.

The doctors will not tell him, and at this point what difference could it make, other than making him feel more stress or more unhappiness?

Deplorable Patriot

Deplorable Patriot Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 1, 2021 11:34

I feel like this all the time. No one in my circles will listen. It’s pointless, and would end up splintering relationships that will be needed as these people all go down sick.

I actually feel this way about ALL vaccines to an extent, and I still think that my younger nephew is actually vaccine injured. No one will listen to me on that, either, given there is another diagnosis that fits. They didn’t listen to me about the one drug he was on, and I turned out to be right. I was the first one to call that the drug was the problem, and eventually it could not be ignored.

This is no different. All the research won’t change minds when all the people in family want to be able to do is travel, and that was the driver for the decision.

ROBERT BAKER

ROBERT BAKER  Reply to  Deplorable Patriot October 1, 2021 12:36

You are a real life Cassandra. The fact that you endure this psychological burden because you know at some point in the future those people will need you is admirable. You are demonstrating the true character of a disciple of the Lord. Your faith is obviously sustaining you.

Deplorable Patriot

Deplorable Patriot Coyote Reply to  ROBERT BAKER October 1, 2021 12:41

I have no choice.

rayzorback

rayzorback Wolverine Reply to  Deplorable Patriot October 1, 2021 23:37

Nor do any of us……
Like I’ve been saying (not recently here) for years…
GOD… is in COMPLETE control of EVERYTHING.

gil00

gil00 Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 1, 2021 11:34

He’s in total denial. Like an addict you can force a revelation. When his wife asks for help you can talk to her. Otherwise id just let them go.

gil00

gil00 Coyote Reply to  gil00 October 1, 2021 11:57

I meant can’t force…

Emeraldstar

Emeraldstar  Reply to  Tonawanda October 1, 2021 11:40

>>”I have spoken to him a couple times at length”<<

Would it be more productive to focus on the potential REMEDIES, first, than on the likely CAUSES?

For months now, posters here have been *extraordinarily* helpful in suggesting many means to offset the adverse effects.

Right to try?

Survivor-mectin, perhaps?

As has been established, it ISN’T a lack of oxygen in the lungs, it’s instead the lack of TRANSFER of the oxygen in the lungs to the bloodstream.

Get better first, and only THEN figure out the likely cause.

Am I missing something here?

I hope this helps …

Emeraldstar

Emeraldstar  Reply to  Tonawanda October 1, 2021 11:41

>>”I have spoken to him a couple times at length”<<

Would it be more productive to focus on the potential REMEDIES, first, than on the likely CAUSES?

For months now, posters here have been *extraordinarily* helpful in suggesting many means to offset the adverse effects.

Right to try?

Survivor-mectin, perhaps?

As has been established, it ISN’T a lack of oxygen in the lungs, it’s instead the lack of TRANSFER of the oxygen in the lungs to the bloodstream.

Get better first, and only THEN figure out the likely cause.

Am I missing something here?

I hope this helps …

[mistyped my login …]

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 1, 2021 22:34

I suspect your friend is going through what I went through.

How long after he got the jab until he had symptoms?
Which jab did he get?
What normal jab symptoms did he have?

Tell them you know a scientist who had COVID and suffered breathing problems, but got better, and thinks he can help.

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 2, 2021 07:41

He got the shots in March. I will ask him what type. The breathing problem was gradual and started about a month ago and has become severe.

We spoke again yesterday, and I suggested D3 and Zinc. Oddly enough, his own doctor told him to take those, and he has not taken them. Now he says he will.

He is going in for angiograms on Tuesday and used that as a polite excuse to defer on any further discussion.

But I would love to hear your perspective when I get you the info.

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 3, 2021 14:01

Great! Both D3 and zinc are necessary to fight off respiratory viruses, and they tend to be deficient as we get older. If he does have spike protein lung damage, every minor respiratory virus brings back the COVID lung problems.

Also magnesium helps me. It is a vasodilator and antihypertensive, and I suspect that it is a PULMONARY vasodilator, too.

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 3, 2021 14:38

TY. I will talk to him again. He is overwhelmed, I can tell, and scared.

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 3, 2021 14:56

I know that fear. Inability to breathe properly is extremely scary. And it scared a lot of people onto vents where they died.

One of the foulest tricks of both COVID and MASKS is that they mess up O2 / CO2 balance. One has to ADAPT to the new balance. THAT is hard. One reason I refuse to wear a mask is that it really messes with my oxygen balance. It messes me up for HOURS. And I’m IMMUNE, damn it! Pointless and CRUEL to make me wear a mask – these Stalinist bastards!

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 10, 2021 22:35

I am still trying to find out what “vax” he took. He is not doing well. He had two angiograms and the doctors are still uncertain what his problem is, and he has been fretful (so I am told).

It is a delicate situation.

But please keep this post in mind so when I find out we can discuss.

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 10, 2021 22:44

Good! I’m still paying attention!

One way you might get him the proper help is to suggest that he may have HAD COVID AND DIDN’T KNOW IT. Both he and the Covidian doctors will believe that, before they will believe that the jab WAS the “Covid” that he got.

That will get the docs thinking that he has long-haul, and they may send him on to a “long-haul” specialist.

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 10, 2021 22:48

TY for staying with this. I am trying to talk with him the best way, but he is distracted, and it is hard to do.

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 10, 2021 22:49

Yes! The best thing may just be sympathy and to keep him holding on.

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 10, 2021 22:53

So far, that is the only sensible way. Truth is the best generally, but at the right time, otherwise it can be a bad choice if the truth creates more negativity.

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Admin Coyote Reply to  Tonawanda October 10, 2021 22:59

Gail’s story of her long-term oxygen problem being cleared up by moxidectin (relative of ivermectin) may be useful, because it can be mentioned simply as fact – and it’s kind of funny because it was an accidental exposure (while dipping sheep in a skin-penetrating formulation).

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 10, 2021 23:12

I remember her story, although initially I was confused by what she said. After a sharp remark I got it.

I took eyebermactain to him and he refused despite my soft approach. But maybe he will listen now, when I get a chance to talk to him.

Tonawanda

Tonawanda Wolverine Reply to  Wolf Moon October 12, 2021 16:27

I spoke to my friend. He took Moderna. When I asked he pre-emptively said “what I have has nothing to do with the voccine.”

He said the docs told him he had severe pulmonary hypertension, and there was nothing they could do except give him the generic form of Viagra.

The MDs might very well be telling him exactly the way it is, and who am I to say differently? Still, his case at least proves to me how deep my distrust is.

TY for engaging on this personal interest! As always, I highly respect your knowledge and judgment.

Wolf again…..

Now – if you follow through that conversation, you will see that Tona’s friend started off with vaccination, followed later by persistent shortness of breath. You can see that I suspected he might need magnesium as a pulmonary vasodilator – that his case might be similar to mine, which was from COVID itself, only his seems to be much WORSE.

Later, you see that he’s getting an angiogram – meaning, they’re going to look at his blood vessels. This is heading exactly where I thought it was going.

Finally, you see that it is verified that Tona’s friend took the Moderna vaccine, and has pulmonary hypertension.

This confirmed everything that I suspected.

Now – WHY did I suspect that this man had pulmonary hypertension?

FIRST, because I have LONG been following the story of endothelial damage in the capillaries of the lungs by SARS-CoV-2 – more specifically by the spike protein – and resultant pulmonary symptomology (including shortness of breath), from all the way back in March and April of 2020, when Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell realized that the ARDS vent strategy “imported from China” was ALL WRONG. He started looking at high-altitude sickness as a better (though still flawed) model of the disease, and quickly understood the endothelial and pulmonary capillary thrombotic nature of SARS-COV-2 infections.

See, for example:

LINK: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32665939/

As you can see, by the middle of 2020, the DISEASE was already well understood in terms of being a provoker of coagulopathy and the sequelae of that.

It was this coagulopathy, that was causing shortness of breath.

And THAT leads to the SECOND reason I suspected pulmonary hypertension. Something I had seen HERE, actually, in various postings on our site. Thank you to all posters here, who brought this information.

But THIS information was not about the disease. This was about the VACCINE.

Please listen to the video below – it will not only explain what is happening – it will assure you of this good doctor’s credibility.

Canadian doctor warns the worst is ‘yet to come’ from blood clotting damage linked to COVID-19 shots

LINK 1: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-26-canadian-doctor-warns-worst-yet-to-come.html

LINK 2: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadian-doctor-warns-the-worst-is-yet-to-come-from-blood-clotting-damage-linked-to-covid-19-shots/

LINK 3: https(colon)//www.bitchute(dot)com/video/A6GbcUl6blpJ/

There is also a LARGER video which includes the above video – but it ALSO includes additional information – priceless information – about how Chinese crypto-kinetic warfare is used as part of “reality shaping” to support Chinese sociobiological warfare. See if you can arrive independently at the same understanding, and explain it to me in the comments. You will need to listen to the longer video to see it.

LINK 4: https(colon)//www.bitchute(dot)com/video/zAw0Pzg27RTo/

Everything Dr. Hoffe says is – sadly – bad news for “yours truly”, but it MASSIVELY confirms my “hunch” that COVID took at least a DECADE off my life.

This is just a gut-level assessment of the damage to my health, but everything that I’ve seen in my medical test data seems to confirm it. My respiratory, pulmonary, cardiac, vascular, and immune functions are all noticeably impaired after COVID. I do not know if I have pulmonary hypertension, but I suspect that if I do NOT have it, it is only because I have very successfully prevented systemic hypertension. My blood pressure is low, and I have kept it low, thanks to magnesium.

This is part of the reason I have been so adamantly opposed to vaccinating our troops, and regard that action as TREASONOUS. The only people who are helped by medical turnover of our military are the communists – both foreign and domestic.

But let’s not talk about me. Let’s not talk about the US Military.

Let’s talk about Tonawanda’s friend.

The fact that he had the Moderna vaccine is – in my opinion – very important.

Why?

This gets into the observed and known differences between the vaccines, which I have watched VERY CAREFULLY from the very beginning. I very CLOSELY watched the Phase One trials for both Pfizer and Moderna.

The Moderna vaccine was NOTORIOUS for causing symptoms VERY similar to the disease, including fever, exhaustion, headaches, muscular and kidney aches. Worse than that, the Moderna systemic effects were extremely common in the trial group.

If I had to describe my “non-taker” impression of the Moderna shot like a “gourmet” might, it would be like the Shingrix shingles vaccine first shot, only more systemic like the second shot.

A shingles vaccine “gourmet” sidebar:

Wolf’s Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Wolf’s Chill Second Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Yes – I was “pro-vax” before all the industry, media, and government LIES built up to an intolerable level.

Back to the story on Moderna and Pfizer.

Here is a typical example of a Moderna recipient – economist and actor Ben Stein.

LINK: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/ben-stein-issues-warning-suffers-severe-side-effects-covid-vaccine-days-getting-shot-video/

The symptoms Ben describes are VERY MUCH like COVID-19 itself.

The Pfizer vaccine – surprisingly – did not have strong observable and immediate effects like Moderna. The incidence of anything more than a bit of local swelling was almost non-existent in the Phase One trial group.

The Pfizer vaccine moved up near the top of my “I might take this one” list.

Thus, it was very surprising that LATER, lots of problems with the Pfizer “clot shot” came into view, as the vaccine was being delivered to people. To some extent, I believe that the NUMBERS of many side effects simply don’t appear in trials, but THAT is not the whole story. I am now convinced that Pfizer is led by incredibly dishonest people, and that they very likely gamed the trials to hide problems.

And very ironically, there is some SCIENCE to back that up. The GAMING begins with the vaccine itself.

What’s interesting there, is that Pfizer’s data on biological distribution of their vaccine in test animals – which we had to get from the Japanese government – not only explained the nature and biodistribution of side effects seen in vaccine recipients – it explained the SHEDDING of VACCINE to others in close contact with the recipient.

This was, IMO, phenomenal detective work by the people who got that data. The Pfizer vaccine’s array of issues was due to the PERSISTENCE and SLOW RELEASE of the vaccine – as well as the obvious LIPID MOBILITY of the LIPID NANOPARTICLES. It took DAYS for the vaccine to release most of the mRNA into cells. The vaccine had plenty of time to move around in bodily lipids. It even had time to be EXCRETED in bodily lipids.

But NOW, I can ALSO use this same explanation for the difference between Pfizer and Moderna in the trials.

Pfizer basically created what is essentially a slow-release vaccine without telling people it was slow-release. VERY beneficial in trials – no?

Moderna’s vaccine also uses lipid nanoparticles, BUT their vaccine clearly deploys FASTER into cells. There is significant overlap, nonetheless, in cardiovascular deployment, as Dr. Hoffe notes. Moderna is likewise distributing throughout the body, and producing systemic vascular endothelium-centered effects much like COVID itself does, but Moderna produces symptoms FASTER than Pfizer. The vaccine effects of Moderna are thus much more noticeable – in some ways like the new shingles vaccine, which is a recombinant antigen vaccine, not an mRNA vaccine, and does NOT employ time-delaying lipid encapsulation technology.

Shingrix tends to produce rapid LOCAL symptoms on the first shot, and systemic symptoms on the booster, exactly as we might expect for two fundamentally different immune reactions (naive locally generated to injected antigen on shot 1, and immune secondary cytokine reaction to same on shot 2).

SO – back to Tona’s friend. He got MODERNA. Moderna SHOWS that it produces symptoms similar to COVID. Just ask Ben Stein. We have covered these “whole spike protein” vaccines.

Dr. Hoffe encountered his results using the MODERNA vaccine.

Doctor who vaccinated 900 calls blood clots at capillary level an ‘absolutely new phenomenon’

LINK: https://www.worldtribune.com/doctor-who-vaccinated-900-calls-blood-clots-at-capillary-level-an-absolutely-new-phenomenon/

Dr. Hoffe – at the time of the video – had 9 out of roughly 900 Moderna-receiving patients who were significantly (medically) damaged by the vaccine – and that did not count the 62% of ALL patients (estimated from a smaller sample) who showed signs of microscopic clotting.

Of those 9 patients clinically damaged by the vaccine, SIX of them are described as having “reduced effort tolerance” indicative of pulmonary hypertension. That is exactly what I have from COVID itself. I’m just lucky that my prior health was SO GOOD – far better than most others my age, particularly with my set of comorbidities like “former smoker” – that I was simply “knocked back” to somewhat below normal levels of health for my age.

Others may choose not to believe that Tonawanda’s friend was a victim of side effects of the Moderna vaccine, but in my opinion it is IMPOSSIBLE to dismiss this possibility. In fact, I believe that this case is an exemplary fulfillment of Dr. Hoffe’s warning.

In my opinion, mRNA vaccines are a fundamentally flawed approach, relative to a carefully metered and controlled ANTIGEN vaccine. mRNA vaccines have a “sexy” mechanism, but the whole concept is SCIENCE-CENTERED – not PATIENT-CENTERED.

Science-centered vaccines are a perfect fit for BRUTAL Stalinist socialized medicine, which treats people coldly and unsympathetically.

And THAT is why the Faucist conspirators and Bidenazis are deploying it.

What would Obama do, if nobody could stop him?

THIS is Obamacare – the REALITY. Brutal, corrupt, industrialized medicine.

Ironically – so ironically – profit-centered and capitalist to the core – only the negotiation with the corrupt capitalists is run by Soviet-style bureaucrats. An interesting mix of communism and fascism.

Reject it. Turn away from it. Refuse it.

W

The Obama future. It ain’t Star Trek.