“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
BUT WAIT! The depop shot doesn’t just work on the euthanasia end of things…..
See, for example, what I was thinking BEFORE the Pfizer data showed us that the VACCINE was migrating – i.e, back when I thought it was ONLY the spike protein itself that was migrating.
Yeah. Funny about that spike protein. Funny how Dr. Malone tried to warn NIH and FDA that the spike protein was way too pathogenic to be used as an immunogen, and they just said “we’re good”. (Y’all can research this one yourselves. Look through multiple Malone interviews to find a nice, long, complete account of it.)
It’s taken us a while for this to be generally recognized, but I think we’re there now.
“The spike protein is probably one of the most toxic proteins the human body has ever seen.”
Dr. Paul Marik explains the dangers of a buildup of spike protein in the body, from inflammation to autoimmune disease.
The answers in the above Twitter video are not as “scientifically complete and direct” as I would have answered, and I actually have some minor scientific quibbles, but overall, this is 99% correct, and completely correct on the outrageous pathogenicity of the spike protein.
Especially the Wuhan-sequence spike protein that they STILL include in the shots, for absolutely no scientifically valid reason.
Yeah, think about that. GODDAMN depoppers.
I have to say, the fact that I came to the same conclusion as Malone about the spike protein a long time ago, but after he did, for completely different reasons, backs the idea that this could have been, should have been, and probably WAS obvious to somebody else.
Using Principles of Protein Equivalence and Analogy as Predictive Tools for Coronavirus Understanding Surely you’ve heard of the BROWN RECLUSE SPIDER. The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that …
TL;DR – you MUST listen to a short podcast of a scientist revealing the latest research on the spike protein vaccines. The VACCINE ITSELF (not just the spike protein – the mRNA vaccine itself) is persistent and is not only concentrating in ovaries – THE VACCINE ITSELF IS EXCRETED – e.g., in breast milk. Meaning …
As a young science student in the 1970s, I never would have thought that I would have to correct the American and global media over an issue of late 19th century basic science, but yet, here we are. When basic theories of MATTER and CHEMISTRY proved that “Compound A created by one route has the …
Which just makes the idea that some people WANTED this to happen, all the more likely.
What if I could explain every head-scratcher of the “pandemic” with a simple idea – that vaccination is the ideal format for introducing real, workable, tunable, and long-running “population control” into socialized medicine without anybody really noticing or caring? Intro to the Intro It’s one of those things that – once you see it – …
Bottom line – people are recognizing vaccine-related depop as a REALITY.
Time to make them self-reflect upon what they’re doing, pushing these bad vaccines.
NOTE: At the moment, “depop.gov” is not a real site – it’s a “parody hypothetical URL”. I have no idea if anything is parked there. What happens after this is not my doing, and the parody URL stands as what was intended. Parody. But deadly serious parody. It’s time to wake the HELL up, world.
You’ve probably heard OF the Bill Gates “and if we do a REALLY great job on new vaccines“ quote, which many consider to be an admission of population control through vaccines. What is the real story here?
Strap in.
This is a complex question, beneath all the lies, counter-lies, half-truths, and diabolical chaos left in the wake of the elite and their evil plans.
We’re gonna look at the question, and we’re gonna have FUN doing it, too.
Mood Music
Today I feel like an ANNOYING PUNK OF SCIENCE, pointing out the fecklessness of the lying elite and their captive lab coats of FAKE SCIENCE, with their ridiculous population control shot and their wicked lies to try to make us take it (yeah, FJB!), so I’m choosing the sneering, annoying, Billy Idol to be today’s musical mascot.
We continue this THIRD installment in our series on The Population Control Shot with a discussion of the notorious Bill Gates quote which incongruously juxtaposes vaccines with reduction of either population or population increase, take your pick.
This is it.
So what’s the real story here? Did he really say this? And what did he mean?
In my opinion, this episode turns out to be one of the most remarkably complex LIES + COVER in history. It is every bit as brilliant as Lancetgate and the HCQ / ivermectin hit job studies.
Get your SNEER on.
Even when the numbers are wrong, the science can be right. Always keep focused on the big picture. “THEY” will try to throw you off on details.
First – Did Gates Really Say That?
Looking only at the quote itself, there is audio of him saying it, that’s very fast and easy to verify that – YES – he said it. Pay careful attention to the exact wording.
As you can see, it’s very easy for “telephone” effects to creep in on this quote, with “great” turning into “good“, and “on” turning into “with“, not to mention “new” (as in “new vaccines”) disappearing. There’s not a LOT of difference in meanings, but there is some.
At the very least, it’s sloppy, and easy to get derailed into trivia about inaccuracy. Fact checkers love such diversions.
Now, the next question is context. Is that quote missing some necessary context when it’s standing alone?
In my opinion, the context is enlightening about Bill Gates’ thinking, but it turns out not to make much difference in the quote. He’s basically making a projection about population, as something that impacts climate change, and then talks about the fact that certain simple changes in how we’re doing things, would only reduce that projected population increase by 10-15%.
Gates is saying, basically, that ALL THIS STUFF HE MENTIONS, even his favorite thing, vaccines, can only lower the projected increase in population by a fraction of that increase.
You can either READ or LISTEN TO the full context of the TED speech at the following link. I’ve also embedded the video below.
The above article about the video is interesting for several reasons.
it triumphantly chides the fact checkers on “Gates really said this”, but pointedly fails to bring up or counter any of THEIR arguments
it notes that the YouTube video has disappeared
it provides an embedding of the TED video
it allows creation of a timeline
Gates speech was in 2010
author’s first article was in 2020
this article was from 2021
it does NOT address the question of what Bill Gates MEANT by saying that vaccines would help to reduce population increase
That’s actually a good question.
What in the heck do vaccines have to do with REDUCING population?
As a side note, it’s somewhat MISLEADING that this article lets the reader ASSUME that Gates meant something nefarious here. However, it’s even MORE misleading to go to the fact-checkers, who will conversely tell you SOME MORE TRUTH, and thus misleadingly imply that the story ends THERE.
Indeed, this point is where things get complicated – probably by DESIGN.
If you don’t get past the truth of the article, and THEN the truth of the fact-checkers, you will remain trapped in a kind of diversion, in which Gates wins. It’s actually a very smart defense.
You have to get past this “immunizing fake scandal” to figure out what’s really going on.
You will see later that Gates very likely SAID THIS ON PURPOSE, so that people would “discover” what the fact checkers tell you, and settle on it.
Because “what’s next” amounts to Gates’ ultimate defense.
Ask what they were REALLY getting these medals for.
Gates: The Innocent Do-Gooder
Let’s start off with Bill Gates stating WHY he’s interested in vaccines.
I’m pretty sure that’s the establishment shill Scott Pelley “interviewing” Melinda Gates.
Pelley was the presstitute who tried to “take down” Mike Cernovich for Hillary Clinton on the whole #HillaryHealth issue during the 2016 election – with a rather amazing backfire.
We can TRUST that this 2018 Melinda Gates interview is a softball set-up for the Gates Foundation.
The establishment WANTS people to suck this up – whether it’s true or false.
What is being alleged here is a paradoxical effect…..
…..that by people “living better” they have healthier kids…..
…..that better lives and healthier kids leads to fewer kids…..
…..that by having fewer kids, the population decreases…..
…..and could in principle even stabilize or decline.
If this is correct, and I believe that it IS correct – more or less – then helping people live better, so that they have fewer but healthier kids, can basically “defuse” the so-called population bomb.
I personally believe that the achievement of zero population growth (ZPG) by Japan was a perfect demonstration that this principle CAN work.
It may not work for every society, and it may not be compatible with all the freedoms we desire (gotta stay skeptical), but we know that it’s not a complete loser.
But before we go on, let’s ask a pesky question or two.
WHY would the IMF then try to subvert Japan’s population “success” by trying to force them to take in Muslim immigrants, which would be very likely to cause social problems, including new population problems?
For that matter, why does the UN actually CAUSE migration problems, and then “solve” them in nonsensical ways that make things worse? When we KNOW that migration problems lead directly to new population problems?
Somebody’s not really serious about things – and in my opinion, it’s because “population” is NOT the goal of the people at the top – sometimes referred to as “Mr. Global”. CONTROL is far more likely to be their goal.
In my opinion, the “population crisis” is only a motivator for lower-level DUPES. But we’ll get to that in a moment.
Let’s get back to Gates. It seems like he’s telling the truth! Vaccines (and I’m talking vaccines that are TRULY safe and effective) WILL (or at least could) actually help reduce the rate of population increase, or even help to stop the increase, or help reverse it.
OMG! Is Bill Gates INNOCENT???!!!
AND Logic To The Rescue
Remember what I love to say about Hitler and “2+2=4” – the idea that the truth of that statement does not depend on who is saying it.
Even bigger, this.
Hitler stating publicly, for the world, that “2+2=4”, would not preclude Hitler’s own Nazi camp guards literally grinding Jews under rifle butts until they said “2+2=5”. Nor would it preclude Hitler from secretly believing “2+2=5” in some mystical occult fashion.
The truth of 2+2=4 is independent of who states it, or why.
BUT – remember as well, something I ALSO like to say.
There is no cover like the truth.
Thus, we are led to the truth that Gates may speak openly about a very publicly palatable route to population control, but that fact does NOT preclude him from ALSO secretly pursuing a more aggressive route to the same goal.
To assume it’s one or the other is an ERROR that you are encouraged to make by “exclusive OR thinking”. The kind of thinking which explains why “they want you divided”.
AND – there are certain advantages to DOING BOTH.
“bad vaccines” depopulate much faster, while “good depopulation” through “good vaccines” helps to manage public expectations, and can even “succeed more than we thought”
a “good cause” always provides the cover of innocence to a “bad cause” (see Aubergine’s razor)
“good vaccines” are so adjacent to “bad vaccines”, that only LIES are needed to complete the deception, that ONE is not in fact THE OTHER.
And if you don’t like calling them “bad vaccines”, perhaps we can cynically call them “socially more efficacious” vaccines. Indeed, think about that. “Socially”, they’re not just more effective – the killer vaccines are “safer”! Maybe even “socially more just”! I’m sure Obama would like that.
So what does Wolf think?
“You can’t catch me!” said The Spiky Shot Man
I think that Bill Gates NEVER changed his spots or his stripes.
The same guy who used every underhanded trick imaginable, to sabotage Linux in favor of Windows, while evading all blame in the mainstream press, did NOT go into “curing malaria in our lifetime” because he suddenly found his sweet soul.
Let’s look at this guy’s prior history, between LINUXGATE and DEPOPGATE, just in terms of attacking COVID treatments. What follows here are 7 earlier posts about Gates and/or Lancetgate and/or related conspiracies against treatments other than the Population Control Shot.
I think it is now quite clear that Bill and Melinda Gates need to get the hell out of science and medicine for the good of humanity. I am going to show you why. I am not saying that Bill Gates is doing anything new. I am saying that he moved his disastrous “Windows Effect” …
Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President: AND our wonderful REALFLOTUS. Hopefully, this great couple is getting some REST, because they may NEED IT. I am telling y’all – the Trumps may very well be on their way back to the White House in 1-3 years. In fact, the way Obammunism has been …
The Pub is OPEN again! With a blend of humor and seriousness, like any good bar, we celebrate this grand re-opening of WOLF’S PUB on Christmas Eve, December 24, 2021, by actually opening near closing time on Christmas Eve Eve, but what the heck. IT’S ALMOST CHRISTMAS. While our beloved bartender takes a needed break …
Yeah. This fucker can PAY FOR MY RESPIRATOR. Just read this. The guy who funded the UNETHICAL virus research that gave me the fucking shortness of breath….. The guy who promoted a curiously fortuitous corona virus “exer-psy-op” while his CHINESE FRIENDS let loose the ChiCom-19 virus….. The guy who worked with DEMOCRATS to try to …
The murderous LancetGate Effect is back, and this time it killed thousands before bureaucrats relented and allowed doctors to save patients. [ Hat Tip to barkerjim for alerting me to this Indonesian case. ] Part 1 – LancetGate Effect 1.0 and 1.1 Ah, the memories of LancetGate! That moment when “they” “finally” “proved” that hydroxychloroquine …
This [Q-3]TH of AUGUST FRIDAY open thread is OPEN – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA / KAG! / KMAG world (KMAG being a bit of both MAGA and KAG!). You can say what you want, comment on what …
Things are happening faster than I expected. Check this out. We need to contribute to this effort. Please dig up EVERY LINK that you can find of anti-HCQ and post it here. Be sure to include a description, including WHO exactly is referenced, to save people time when they go through comments. Also, I highly …
SO – it’s not like I’m just pulling my suspicion of Gates out of the clear blue sky.
I believe all of the following.
Gates helped sabotage every exit from the population control shots that he could, including HCQ and ivermectin
the Gates divorce is a money and power protection device, invoked because there was too much failure on the COVID scam, and the Gates world is protecting its assets
Gates eased into vaccines via malaria, knowing that going directly to vaccines might raise suspicions
Gates “owns” CEPI and GAVI so that, combined with the Gates Foundation, he effectively has two votes on all things vaccine-related
Gates is by nature “covertly direct”, ruthless, secretive, and aggressive – so he CANNOT not pursue direct depopulation – it’s IN HIS NATURE
Gates always takes dangerous fast shortcuts that cause problems (see WINDOWS), so there is no way he would bypass direct depopulation methods in favor of slower methods
Gates has tried to keep his fingerprints off the depopulation shots, but was largely undone by the spike protein’s striking success as an abortifacient
Gates is very likely behind Surgisphere and LancetGate, but I don’t know if anybody will ever be able to prove it, because these “titans” like Gates, Zuckerberg and Brin can just cover for each other in ways that defy detection. If you can’t follow the money, you can’t find the proof. But Surgisphere just smells like Gates. I’m sure he’s behind it.
Gates prepared for his task by developing MSN and MSNBC media ventures. He knows how to manipulate the press.
Gates’ statement in the TED talk was a VERY intentional drop, to “fluff the paradox” and center people’s attention on either a disprovable attack, or a glowing defense – leaving nobody to ask the “AND logic” question, which solves everything neatly.
Gresham’s law applies to depopulation methods. In other words, bad vaccines drive out good ones. And in secret depopulation conspiracy world, they almost certainly do. People who are “performing” for “them” need stronger actions for bigger “gimmes”.
(insert pictures of “nursing home governors” Cuomo, Wolf, Whitmer, Murphy, and Newsom)
Oh, what. the heck – here’s the picture
Let’s cut to the chase. Gates is STILL A MONSTER.
The Getaway
So what is my final prediction?
Gates is slick. Gates seems to get away every time.
Why, he’s probably laughing right now!
I think he’s going to get away this time, too.
But I think we may be able to put the heat on these bastards – enough to make them stop killing us for a while, as they crawl back into their evil villain caves, to plot their next insidious attack.
Evil ain’t going away any time soon. But we can make its life pretty rough in the meanwhile.
*And One Study Showing How Much of a SCAM Fauci’s Beloved Remdesivir Actually Was
The old wisdom of science and medicine, from when I was a kid, has never been disproved. Stated simply:
Disease-conferred immunity in the recovered is always superior to any form of vaccination.
This is why, when we were kids, most scientists and doctors were “unimpressed” by the idea of moving to vaccines for the three main childhood diseases, which diseases themselves provide LIFELONG IMMUNITY against three illnesses that are MUCH ROUGHER on adults.
Why go to a lesser immunity? The diseases are mild in children. The outcomes are excellent. The immunity is SOLID.
Now you can push around the edges of this generality, and find examples where individuals DON’T get good immunity from a “first case” of a disease, and catch it again, whereas some other person gets life-long immunity from a vaccine. Nonetheless, the generality holds at the statistical level, and has always held, because it is LOGICAL.
The whole point of vaccination is to provoke a SUFFICIENT DEFENSE by a LESSER ASSAULT than the disease being prevented.
Thus, for the generality of the old wisdom to be violated, logic, math, and basic biology have to be overturned.
Which is not hard with Democrat minds.
Democrats want to believe things that are politically expedient but simply untrue. I wish I could say the same accusation cannot be leveled against our side, but I can’t. Nevertheless, I find that I can gently correct our side with actual scientific logic, whereas the other side demands “authority”, which they instantly deny to any person or organization that disagrees with them. It’s a solid defense, but it’s not a REAL defense.
In any case, communism is “politics as religion”, and thus it can lead to articles of hope and faith that are held in violation of common sense and widely agreed simple facts – even the most basic science that can be proven at home by anybody.
Thus, the much more solid and honest wisdom of 1960s and 1970s medicine and science began to disappear as the Soviets and Maoists began chipping away at it. By now, it’s in real trouble.
With the COVID hoax, I pretty much thought science was done for. Surprisingly, in the wake of the hoax’s general failure to convince EVERYBODY that up is down and vice versa, we are seeing more and more of the sheepish scientists and doctors who initially went along with things, turning around and disagreeing – although very gently – with the COVID madness.
I would like to show you SIX important points that are now known from scientific studies. You will not see the Bidenistas and Bidenazis trumpeting any of these.
What these points do, is basically show why we don’t need COVID vaccines, nor a particular bad drug called remdesivir.
Indeed, in my opinion, all of these things call into question the entire COVID response, and appear to make it some kind of scam – likely by the World Economic Forum.
I believe that the scam is for global population control, the latter meaning both control of people and control of reproduction.
I’ll explain that at the end, but a bit along the way, too.
PS – thanks to Wheatie for the above image, to RF121 for the link to 4 of these papers, and to Wheatie again for information about the Rockefeller Foundation censoring “misinformation” through Red Jen and Actor Vivek.
Six Points, To The Point
1 – Disease-conferred immunity appears to be 6.72 TIMES as strong as immunity from the COVID vaccines
2 – mRNA vaccines cause spike protein to begin circulating in the bloodstream almost immediately
3 – The antibodies raised by COVID vaccines show pre-existing “memory” immunity to COVID and the vaccines
4 – 99% of those infected by C19 show fast, specific, and effective (“robust”) antibody response
5 – For 2-shot vaccines, shot 1 needlessly elicits memory antibodies, but shot 2 dangerously elicits prompt antibodies
6 – Remdesivir does NOT work against COVID, but it does lengthen time in the hospital
OK, people. Let me break down THOSE items with fuller descriptions.
Six Points, Explained
1 – Disease-conferred immunity appears to be 6.72 TIMES as strong as immunity from the COVID vaccines
Yeah, gotta love those insignificant digits. SEVEN WILL DO – roughly.
This is from an Israeli study that looked at all the people getting infected right now. You will recall that almost all Israelis are vaccinated, yet all of a sudden, people are getting it again – which means that most of them have to be (and in fact WERE) vaccinated.
It turns out that, among the people who are getting COVID in Israel right now, are a few people who had it already – but VERY few of them. If you do the numbers, then it’s clear that catching the disease provides better protection than the vaccine. This is hardly unexpected – like I said – this was old school predictable knowledge back in the 1960s and 1970s.
Stated differently: “Catch a cold one year, you probably won’t catch it again next year, or the year after.”
COMMON. WISDOM.
The number may be a quibble – earlier estimates were actually HIGHER than a factor of 7. So this is a conservative estimate.
But let me repeat what I said. This is exactly what we expect from colds and flu bugs. EXACTLY.
Bottom line, they tried to take something that we already knew, and repackage it as something new and scary. Now, it’s easy to see that this was all about keeping and gaining power over us.
2 – mRNA vaccines cause spike protein to begin circulating in the bloodstream almost immediately
This is actually one of FOUR papers cited in a frontline doctor organizational email, which was then explained in the now-famous video by Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi.
If you have NOT seen this video, you should watch it. If you have seen it, then what you will be reading here (the next 4 points) is what he’s talking about, but related more directly to each of the 4 papers.
The email that describes the 4 papers will be included as an appendix. It describes the significance of the 4 papers, but I am restating that significance in my own terms, here, from my own perspective.
In my opinion, this first point shows exactly why the mRNA vaccines are so problematic, and were never a good idea. Not only is there a ton of vaccine migration PROVEN by the Pfizer leaked documents – there is massive spike protein circulation in the bloodstream. This spike protein activity circulating throughout the body is clearly the cause of all the problems associated with the vaccine.
In my opinion, it’s not a mistake. I believe the manipulated purpose of the vaccines was in fact incremental population reduction by flushing very early pregnancies on a huge but statistically significant scale.
3 – The antibodies raised by COVID vaccines show pre-existing “memory” immunity to COVID and the vaccines
This is a SMOKING GUN. What this means is that all the health authorities LIED to us about a lack of pre-existing immunity. The vaccines are immunizing people to something they are already somewhat or even completely immune to.
Read that again. “Asymptomatic cases” = “basically already almost completely immune”.
Remember early in 2020, when a lone, old, distinguished professor of immunology in Europe dared to publish online a STATEMENT (no way could he get it into a journal) that only pre-existing immunity could explain what we were seeing clinically with COVID-19, and his letter was then censored everywhere?
He is proven COMPLETELY RIGHT in this paper.
Now that we can carefully study new infections with COVID-19, it turns out that people are responding to the disease as “something they’ve seen before”. Yes – it’s THAT similar to the other weak beta coronaviruses.
As many have said, the disease was not actually novel. It was JUST NOVEL ENOUGH. Just novel enough, thanks to gain of function, to win the race for the seasonal best-seller. It’s like a new paperback romance that breaks no new ground as either literature or love-porn, but simply puts tiny tweaks on something everybody has seen before.
Fifty Shades of Nonfluenza.
I repeat. This was a WEAPONIZED COLD – a “new” cold – and THEY KNEW IT.
This was an ECONOMIC ASSAULT on the world. And likely by the World Economic Forum.
Which incidentally sponsored Event 201.
You FUCKERS.
4 – 99% of those infected by C19 show fast, specific, and effective (“robust”) antibody response
The point here was that EVERYBODY who gets COVID-19 – including those who barely have any symptoms or NONE AT ALL – get excellent antibody response – and they SHOW IT. The antibodies may go away, leaving the strong and effective MEMORY antibodies on standby, but the system is soon primed and ready to go.
Which then raises the question – in combination with the prior points…..
Wouldn’t most healthy people just want to get the DISEASE instead of the vaccine? They get better immunity, proven, even if they have ZERO symptoms.
We were SNOOKERED.
This goes back to something that the Fake News media and Fake Medicine CDC hid from us.
When antibody tests first became available, there was an apparent hesitation by authorities (particularly in blue states) to release results. HOWEVER, there were several “blooper” releases of information from hospitals and doctors – at least one of which was forced into disavowing their own prior statement.
What they were finding was double-digit numbers of people who already had antibodies to COVID-19. At that point, the antibody tests were SUPPOSED TO BE unique for COVID-19, and NOT for the prior beta coronaviruses. But yet, they showed antibodies for 30% of people or HIGHER. Later, authorities (including CDC) badmouthed the antibody tests as being flawed because they were picking up antibodies to “other coronaviruses”.
NOW it is completely possible to see what they were trying not to admit. Between prior exposure to both COVID-19 itself and strains of the other 4 weak beta coronaviruses, people were ALREADY IMMUNE.
OLD ANTIBODIES WORKED ON COVID-19.
You see what I’m saying? They would rather falsely “admit” that the tests were “not working”, than to truly admit that the tests worked TOO WELL, and most of us were already immune to COVID-19 to varying degrees. Why? Because that would eliminate the FEAR.
They reframed the PROTECTIVE cross-strain immunity as a test problem, rather than a natural immunity blessing.
It was all about the election. It was all about government control.
It was all a LIE and a HOAX.
5 – For 2-shot vaccines, shot 1 needlessly elicits memory antibodies, but shot 2 dangerously elicits prompt antibodies
This part is actually rather interesting. This is a point that Dr. Bhakdi makes late in his video. The first vaccine shot is NEEDLESS but HARMLESS. Well – more or less. Most people are actually IMMUNE TO THE VACCINE.
Yeah, I want you to read that again.
They can reframe reality – I WILL REFRAME IT BACK.
When you inject somebody with a needless vaccine to which they are already immune, the people simply have an immune response to the assault. Yeah, you can call it a booster, or whatever, but the point is that you have caused the immune memory to replay an old tape and pump out antibodies that work IN GENERAL on your new COVID strain. Vaccine. Whatever.
But the second injection, coming shortly thereafter, is potentially WORSE than NEEDLESS. With two injections, the first kicks up fresh antibodies to spike protein. The second infects YOUR cells and makes them a target of those antibodies.
This is why we saw all those people DIE after their second injection.
THEY. DID. NOT. NEED. THAT. SECOND. INJECTION.
Yeah, this will be a good fight in science – AND the courtroom.
Frankly, I think there need to be lawsuits here, for anybody who would have had a normal contraindication to a second shot, which IMO should have been ALL diabetics, cardiovascular patients, etc. In fact, many of those folks should not have gotten a first shot, because IMO the people that COVID didn’t kill in spring of 2020 were mostly immune, INCLUDING diabetics.
They didn’t need the vaccine. And the vaccine – especially the second shot – killed them.
And hey! If it had been ok to criticize vaccines earlier on social media and not get kicked off, we might have discovered this earlier, and saved a few lives! And dollars!
But no, we live in a fully Orwellian world, where Polish pink diaper that censors people telling the truth about vaccines gets AWARDS for protecting free speech.
6 – Remdesivir does NOT work against COVID, but it does lengthen time in the hospital
This is just “sweet revenge” as Ted Nugent called it. KARMA.
Now I have to admit that I was just as fooled as Trump on this. Fauci – what a scammer.
I saw in the very earliest results that remdesivir was WORSE than not working – it was removing people’s kidneys faster than COVID was. AYE-YI-YI. Bad stuff.
And yet Fauci had the BRASS ASS to go on national television and call remdesivir the “GOLD STANDARD” after that performance. Sheesh! Trust me – Trump saw it, too. This was CLASSIC “you have to show them”.
Admittedly, to some extent, this was “fighting the fear”, and you can see why the POTUS has to take part. But who was generating the fear?
Yeah. Much easier to see the controlling characteristics of the hoax NOW.
Anyway, scientifically, the problem is, there is no point in giving people an antiviral like remdesivir AFTER the virus has already created devastation. You have to deliver the antiviral EARLY – exactly like Dr. Zelenko realized very early on.
Doesn’t matter what KIND of an antiviral – even a piss-poor one, or an atypical one, like hydroxychloroquine, is going to WORK if it gets there EARLY. Late – it simply doesn’t matter.
Now the thing is, remdesivir has to be INJECTED. It could only be used in a HOSPITAL setting – or at least, so they said. I disagreed. People inject stuff in SUBWAYS. Let’s get SMART here.
Well, as a CHUMP HONEST SCIENTIST, my thought was, why not simply administer remdesivir early, by injection, at a lower and safer dose, on an outpatient basis, upon diagnosis? In the doctor’s office, or at a specialist. Nothing worse than a blood draw. Same time that people are being given hydroxychloroquine, or regeneron. It would actually WORK then.
WELL, you see, this paper does more than just prove that remdesivir doesn’t work. I proves WHY they never did the logical thing with it.
Administer it early and effectively, and you don’t SELL AS MUCH. Administer it late and desperately, and you sell a TON of it. And it’s expensive as HELL.
Oh. My. God. I was such a chump. I assumed they would do the right thing if they knew what that was.
The pharmaceutical industry, at this point, is CRAVEN. THEY JUST SELL PRODUCT.
Y’all remember how Fauci bullshitted Trump about remdesivir – how he lied about moving the goal posts? Helps if you know the full story about it, but here’s new evidence that the shit’s actually harmful.
In my opinion, it is now time to call this crap out.
This is one of the most needless vaccines ever – one of the worst outcomes for a vaccine ever – no matter which one – and it is BECAUSE COVID-19 is fundamentally a case where there should not BE a vaccine for most people.
This is a case that was KNOWN not to be very amenable to a vaccine. It was only by a FEAR PSYCHOLOGY OPERATION that we were scammed into accepting the idea that we needed a really badly performing COLD VACCINE.
It’s a MONEYMAKER for industry – their PAWN MOTIVE – and a CONTROL AGENT for various levels of government – their PAWN MOTIVE. Ultimately, it’s about a global effort to gain control – most likely being mediated through the World Economic Forum, since almost all the guilty parties are either “partners” like Google/Alphabet or “organizations” like the Rockefeller Foundation.
And THAT is where we find the really basic motivation for the COVID hoax – as a PLATFORM of human control.
Once I realized that Bill Gates created Windows not as an operating system, but as a PLATFORM to change human behavior into a path he created, I realized the power of creating PLATFORMS. It’s a GOD THING.
You see, the mandatory vaccine platform is basically “The Island” where the entire planet is “The Island”. The people in control are liars, they can inject you with whatever they want, and they then have power of life and death over you, because they lie with impunity.
To start with, I believe the globalist scum are introducing a kind of limited, very incremental contraceptive.
TL;DR – you MUST listen to a short podcast of a scientist revealing the latest research on the spike protein vaccines. The VACCINE ITSELF (not just the spike protein – the mRNA vaccine itself) is persistent and is not only concentrating in ovaries – THE VACCINE ITSELF IS EXCRETED – e.g., in breast milk. Meaning …
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …
Using Principles of Protein Equivalence and Analogy as Predictive Tools for Coronavirus Understanding Surely you’ve heard of the BROWN RECLUSE SPIDER. The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that …
Now – if you followed that patent history work that Dr. David “Bowtie” Martin did on the coronavirus and vaccines, then you realize that they’ve been aware of the spike protein for TWENTY YEARS. Its CONTRACEPTIVE activities had to have been known – likely from before understanding of the spike protein per se, when coronaviruses were just viruses which caused potentially contraceptive symptoms in some patients.
This is a no-brainer, people. We have been manipulated.
W
John Fink and James Coburn discuss case in a scene from the film ‘The Carey Treatment’, 1972. (Photo by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Getty Images)
Appendix: The Letter
Letter to Physicians: Four New Scientific Discoveries Regarding the Safety and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines
SCIENTISTS CONCLUDE THE BENEFIT OF COVID-19 VACCINATION IS “HIGHLY DOUBTFUL” BUT VACCINE INJURY IS “WELL SUBSTANTIATED”
Doctors for Covid Ethics has sent the following letter to tens of thousands of doctors in Europe, summarising four recent scientific findings critical to the COVID-19 vaccination program. The letter explains each finding as it relates to the biology of COVID-19 vaccines, including interactions with the immune system.
Taken together, the letter warns that these new pieces of evidence force all physicians administering COVID-19 vaccines to re-evaluate the merits of COVID-19 vaccination, in the interests of their own ethical standing, and their patients’ safety and health.
A video explanation of the underlying immunology by Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD is here, with German subtitles here.
*
Dear Colleague:
Four recent scientific discoveries are herewith brought to your urgent attention. They alter the entire landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic, and they force us to reassess the merits of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.
Summary
Rapid and efficient memory-type immune responses occur reliably in virtually all unvaccinated individuals who are exposed to SARS-CoV-2. The effectiveness of further boosting the immune response through vaccination is therefore highly doubtful. Vaccination may instead aggravate disease through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
Discovery 1: SARS-CoV-2 spike protein circulates shortly after vaccination
SARS-CoV-2 proteins were measured in longitudinal plasma samples collected from 13 participants who received two doses of Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine [1]. With 11 of the 13, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was detected in the blood within only one day after the first vaccine injection.
Significance. Spike protein molecules were produced within cells that are in contact with the bloodstream—mostly endothelial cells—and released into the circulation. This means that a) the immune system will attack those endothelial cells, and b) the circulating spike protein molecules will activate thrombocytes. Both effects will promote blood clotting. This explains the many clotting-related adverse events—stroke, heart attack, venous thrombosis—that are being reported after vaccination.
Discovery 2: Rapid, memory-type antibody response after vaccination
Several studies have demonstrated that circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA antibodies became detectable within 1-2 weeks after application of mRNA vaccines [1–3].
Significance. Rapid production of IgG and IgA always indicates a secondary, memory-type response that is elicited through re-stimulation of pre-existing immune cells. Primary immune responses to novel antigens take longer to evolve and initially produce IgM antibodies, which is then followed by the isotype switch to IgG and IgA.
A certain amount of IgM was indeed detected alongside IgG and IgA in some studies [1,4]. Importantly, however, IgG rose faster than IgM [4], which confirms that the early IgG response was indeed of the memory type. This memory response indicates pre-existing, cross-reactive immunity due to previous infection with ordinary respiratory human coronavirus strains. The delayed IgM response most likely represents a primary response to novel epitopes which are specific to SARS-CoV-2.
Memory-type responses have also been documented with respect to T-cell-mediated immunity [5–7]. Overall, these findings indicate that our immune system efficiently recognizes SARS-CoV-2 as “known” even on first contact. Severe cases of the disease thus cannot be ascribed to lacking immunity. Instead, severe cases might very well be caused or aggravated by pre-existing immunity through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE, see below).
Serum antibody profiles were reported for 203 individuals following SARS-CoV-2 infection [8]. 202 (>99%) of the participants exhibited SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. With 193 individuals (95%), these antibodies prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection in cell culture and also inhibited binding of the spike protein to the ACE2 receptor. Furthermore, CD8+ T-cell responses specific for SARS-CoV-2 were clear and quantifiable in 95 of 106 (90%) HLA-A2-positive individuals.
Significance. This study confirms the above assertion that the immune response to initial contact with SARS-CoV-2 is of the memory type. In addition, it shows that this reaction occurs with almost all individuals, and particularly also with those who experience no manifest clinical symptoms.
The goal of the vaccination is to stimulate production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, but we now know that such antibodies can and will be rapidly generated by everyone upon the slightest viral challenge, even without vaccination.
Severe lung infections always take many days to develop, which means that if the antibodies generated by the memory response are needed, they will arrive on time. Therefore, vaccination is unlikely to provide significant benefit with respect to the prevention of severe lung infection.
Discovery 4: Rapid increase of spike protein antibodies after the second injection of mRNA vaccines
IgG and IgA antibody titres were monitored before vaccination and after the first and the second injection of mRNA vaccines [3]. Antibody titres rose with some delay after the first injection, then plateaued, but rose again very shortly after the second injection.
Significance. Even though the antibody response to the first injection is of the memory type, the small time lag after the injection may mitigate adverse reactions, because the abundance of spike protein on the cells in the blood vessel walls and in other tissues may have already passed its peak when the antibodies arrive.
The situation changes dramatically with the second injection. Then the spikes are produced and protrude into the bloodstream that is already swarming with both reactive lymphocytes and antibodies. The antibodies will cause the complement system [9,10] and also neutrophil granulocytes to attack the spike protein-bearing cells. The possible consequences of all-out self-attack by the immune system are frightening.
Antibody-dependent enhancement of disease
As described, memory-type immune responses ensure the rapid rise of antibody titres after initial exposure to SARS-CoV-2, rendering the benefit of vaccine-induced antibody response exceedingly doubtful. Regardless, we should not assume that high antibody titres against SARS-CoV-2 will always improve the clinical outcome. With several virus families—in particular with Dengue virus, but also with coronaviruses—antibodies can aggravate rather than mitigate disease. This occurs because certain cells of the immune system take up antibody-tagged microbes and destroy them. If a virus particle to which antibodies have bound is taken up by such a cell, but it then manages to evade destruction, it may instead start to multiply within the cell. Overall, the antibody will then have enhanced the replication of the virus. Clinically, this antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) can cause a hyperinflammatory response (a “cytokine storm”) that will amplify the damage to the lungs, liver and other organs of our body.
Attempts to develop vaccines to the original SARS virus, which is closely related to SARS-CoV-2, repeatedly failed due to ADE. The vaccines did induce antibodies, but when the vaccinated animals were subsequently infected with the virus, they became more ill than the unvaccinated controls (see e.g. [11]). The possibility of ADE was not adequately addressed in the clinical trials on any of the COVID-19 vaccines. It is therefore prudent to avoid the danger of inducing ADE through vaccination and instead rely on proven forms of treatment [12] for dealing with clinically severe COVID-19 disease.
Conclusion
The collective findings discussed above clearly show that the benefits of vaccination are highly doubtful. In contrast, the harm the vaccines do is very well substantiated, with more than 15.000 vaccination-associated deaths now documented in the EU drug adverse events database (EudraVigilance), and over 7.000 more deaths within the UK and the US [13].
ALL PHYSICIANS MUST RECONSIDER THE ETHICAL ISSUES SURROUNDING COVID-19 VACCINATION.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Notes
1. Ogata, A.F. et al. (2021) Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. -:x-x
2. Amanat, F. et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces functionally diverse antibodies to NTD, RBD and S2. Cell -:x-x
3. Wisnewski, A.V. et al. (2021) Human IgG and IgA responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. PLoS One 16:e0249499
4. Qu, J. et al. (2020) Profile of Immunoglobulin G and IgM Antibodies Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin. Infect. Dis. 71:2255-2258
5. Le Bert, N. et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature 584:457-462
6. Grifoni, A. et al. (2020) Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 181:1489-1501.e15
7. Gallais, F. et al. (2021) Intrafamilial Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Cellular Immune Response without Seroconversion. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27:x-x
8. Nielsen, S.S. et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of disease severity. EBioMedicine 68:103410
9. Magro, C.M. et al. (2020) Docked severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 proteins within the cutaneous and subcutaneous microvasculature and their role in the pathogenesis of severe coronavirus disease 2019. Hum. Pathol. 106:106-116
10. Magro, C.M. et al. (2021) Severe COVID-19: A multifaceted viral vasculopathy syndrome. Annals of diagnostic pathology 50:151645
11. Tseng, C. et al. (2012) Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One 7:e35421
12. McCullough, P.A. et al. (2021) Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection. Am. J. Med. 134:16-22
13. Johnson, L. (2021) Official Vaccine Injury and Fatality Data: EU, UK and US.
This is for the historical record. I hope that this analysis gets to the “dissident scientists” involved, but even if it never does, future historians will get a powerful look at what I call “Fake Science” – the establishment’s phony, deceptive and controlled scientific complex – and how infiltration, control, and discreditation of dissident populist …
You will recall that I located the point where the “suramin error” was dropped in front of the right people to be uploaded to the prominent doctors of the anti-vaxx community, prior to the “magnet challenge” disinformation being similarly uploaded, and then used to discredit them in the Daily Mail.
Part of the suramin attack involved a highly edited video of Judy Mikovits touting suramin, minus the full information about that drug. That video, in combination with erroneous assertions about suramin being in pine tree needles, resulted in the physicians who are currently prominent warning about the COVID vaccines, picking up the error and discrediting themselves in their very current and very popular videos about the gynecological and shedding problems of the persistent and migratory spike protein vaccines.
Well, that video which was used to misinform them has been removed.
Sunlight. It cures quite a bit all on its own.
More seriously, I realized that, at some level there, probably in the background, I was dealing with pro “influencers of influencers of influencers”. I won’t be sharing all my information on that, as much as I would love to, but it became apparent that they are watching us like hawks. Speaking of which…..
2.
The Sleeper Has Awakened
Yes, Sundance just came out with a piece critical of the COVID vaccines. You will recall that SD and his crew were all fairly pro-vaxx, so this tells me there is a fundamental shift going on.
And while the fact that the HHS entrance to VAERS went down at the same time SD came out with this article may very well just be coincidence, I am 100% certain that the policy of Barack Obama and Eric Holder is BACK IN PLACE under Merrick “Whatever You Say, Barack” Garland, and that journalists like Sundance (and ourselves) are being SPIED ON by the federal government, in a abuse of power for political purposes.
SO – anyway – keep an eye on CTH in regard to things “COVID” – there is going to be some good stuff there, I’m willing to bet.
[Just for the record, I wrote this BEFORE the recent CTH post about “QAnon” stuff, which I happen to regard as a very helpful warning, but which was “not received warmly” by most on this site. I’m not looking to exacerbate the situation, but I hate “spiking” anything – for anybody. And I’m going to be very blunt. Sundance is going to have THE BEST coverage of DOJ asshattery against our site, so prepare to see me using a LOT of his coverage in my postings and reasoning. People need to learn to keep their emotions in check, because that is how an army survives – digital or otherwise. WWG1WGA begins with YOU.]
3.
Scientists Are Calling Out The Snakes
Everybody is seeing how people are calling out FAUCI, but in my opinion that’s actually a side-show. The REAL DEAL is scientists calling out the scientific BULLSHIT about COVID, and particularly the spike protein nuttery that was imposed on us. At long last, people in Scienceville are going “WHAT THE #### IS GOING ON?”
First, a video that came to us via Grandmaintexas and this link:
It’s worth listening to the beginning of this video to hear this dude list off his credentials. This guy isn’t just some country doctor. Nor is he old, senile, or out-of-date on current medicine. Just listen to him. This dude is IMPRESSIVE. He’s still sharp as a tack, just like Trump. I would almost say “more”, at the risk of offending some who believe this is not possible! Just listen to him.
Among many other jaw-droppers of sensible scientific perspective, this video basically tells you why I have been so mouth-agape about that Pfizer data snagged back into American science from JAPAN.
You have to look closely at it, but not THAT closely.
The VIDEO adds more about testicular localization in males.
Yeah, boys. It ain’t just the broads. Cross those legs – this is gonna make you cringe like a prostate exam.
One of the things which is EXTREMELY NOTEWORTHY about the video is that this lady YouTuber / Facebooker / BitChuter and all-around “social media presenter” goes into deep detail about the extreme censorship she is encountering, and how she deals with it.
For example, she states that the YouTube video was taken down in about 10 minutes.
Alternatively, you can listen to some different scientists in THIS great video, thanks to singingsoul.
Here we have Bret Weinstein interviewing a doctor and an engineer who explain – to the satisfaction of any honest scientist – WHY the mRNA vaccines (and to a lesser extent, the adenoviral vector vaccines) are CLEARLY problematic.
This is EXACTLY the same stuff we’ve been talking about. And it will be extremely useful in getting to where we are going, looking at NEW VACCINES COMING.
I’ll give you a hint now – the new vaccines could be a strong correction, back to what vaccines SHOULD be – or they could just be a slower and stealthier path to get us where the cabal has us going now – elite-controlled social contraception, and immunity debt enslavement – which is the worst-case future of “vaccine capture” a la Marek.
So – let me review previous posting, mostly mine, but also Deplorable Patriot’s reachy but prophetic question about the incredible and previously unthinkable idea of vaccine shedding. All of it based on what YOU, our loyal posters, brought here for the group to digest.
Take a bow, people. YOU DID GOOD.
4.
A Short Bibliographic Toldjaso From This Site
I will preface each of these blurbs with another short blurb, explaining relevance.
This will “refresh your memory”, before we get into the FUTURE.
We start, very appropriately, with RAND PAUL.
Gotta give DOCTOR Rand Paul credit – he has led the fight to bring SANITY back to medicine and science. Thank GOD Trump put him where he saved the most people – in the SENATE. I also have a personal debt here, as a recoveree, forced to wear a needless mask, aggravating my hypoxia. Rand Paul has FREED ME of my TORTURE MASK.
Introduction You have GOT to see the video I’m going to show you. It’s not just what they’re talking about. It’s WHERE IT LEADS. Most of the people who watch Rand Paul go after Fauci here, are concentrating on MASKS, because that is the TOP LAYER of the argument. But THAT is the small potatoes. …
This post is where disparate cracks in the narrative all opened at once. I was no longer going along with the bullshit. Too many questions, too many pat answers turning up WRONG – no – the narrative was full of holes, and it was time to think ON OUR OWN.
PREFACE I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT. The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – …
I just went back and read this thing, and – WOW – just WOW. I was all over two things – spike protein and genetic incorporation – the JAENISCH paper. We are now all over the spike protein, but we MUST turn our attention to genetic incorporation of the vaccine – particularly in people who “fountain” the spike protein. I had forgotten this, but much of the suspicion of Fauci on this site centered around his seeming obsession with vaccines for viruses capable of genomic incorporation.
Yes, Wuhan is important, but I see that as the plotters playing “hot potato scandal” to distract us from the deeper purposes of this LYING phony pandemic.
Genetic incorporation of these vaccines must be investigated. There has been so much we have been told that is WRONG – I think genetic incorporation due to the spike protein acting as a reverse transcription promoter for its own RNA is a biggie.
Alternate Title: Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective? Gloating Pre-Preface There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought. Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY …
No good guys among these genetic vaccines. They are all RISKY for certain people, and when we EUAed them forward, we took those risks. The problem is, with idiot BIDEN in charge, instead of Trump, there was nobody to push the sensible idea of sparing the vaccine from those for whom it would be knowingly risky.
Every coronavirus vaccine so far has shown us SOME defect upon mass release, which was NOT evident in EVEN phase III clinical trials. Look HERE for a searchable PDF document of adverse effects from the Pfizer vaccine: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/977005/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf Check out these videos on the low-platelet clotting problem from the Oxford/Astrazeneca vaccine. Here is a fantastic …
I was really starting to get it here. I was starting to accept that “it’s the full spike protein, stupid!”
I saw an excellent explanation of the clotting problem with the AstraZeneca vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 here: The doctor, Dr. ZDogg, MD, offers an exceptionally clear explanation of both what is going on with the AstraZeneca vaccine, and why its distribution was halted or limited in some places for some age groups of patients. …
This is when I realized that all the gynecological problems being reported for the COVID vaccines were actually a REAL problem, and not just a sub-problem of the clotting problems. I also realized that this effect was too pronounced to be an accident. And then the complications going to other people in close contact – how could this even be possible?
So I considered what sounded like a more reasonable alternative to “vaccine shedding” – namely, spike protein shedding. Indeed, both avenues could be operating, but vaccine shedding now has DATA to support it, in the form of the Pfizer animal data showing persistence and migration. And if you stay with this to the very end, you will see that these lipid nanoparticles have been nothing but trouble from the beginning. It’s an impressive technology, but clearly not fully baked.
Thus, read this post, knowing that the vaccine is likely to be nearly as persistent as the spike protein it produces. Everything I’m saying for the spike protein, should apply in spades for the vaccine, which essentially brings in mRNA as a transmissible FACTORY for creating spike protein. It would not take much vaccine transfer to create the EXACT problem that is observed in alleged shedding incidents.
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …
This is where I really laid out the evidence that the spike protein is causing the problems we’re seeing.
Using Principles of Protein Equivalence and Analogy as Predictive Tools for Coronavirus Understanding Surely you’ve heard of the BROWN RECLUSE SPIDER. The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that …
If you don’t think those “lipid nanoparticles” of the mRNA vaccines can’t “act like viruses” and basically pass “disease” to a NEW HOST – read this. LNPs ≈ VLPs.
EVERYTHING we are seeing in vaccine medicine now is a COPY of what nature did about 70-100 million years ago, in the insect world. Once I realized this, I was able to pattern this stuff all over what Big Pharma is doing, and get ahead of their game.
This post is probably going to go over a lot of heads, but I think scientists will find it disturbing until they find it compelling, and then ultimately find it satisfying. Creation teaches us – not the other way around.
OK – we’re going to have some fun here – but stick with me, and you could learn A LOT. Cue the music! Borrowed from Wheatie! Previous posts helped put both the SPIKE PROTEIN DISEASE and the SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE into deep perspective. We were seeing that the SOLUTION was a significant part of the …
Deplorable Patriot hit the nail on the head here. Before I accepted the awful fact that these vaccines are not what we thought they were, I didn’t believe shedding could be real. Oh, boy, was I wrong about that.
Our dear boss, Wolf, has been busy putting together scientific primers on just what it is the various shots and inoculations marketed to be preventative of severe symptoms of COVID do, but what hasn’t been addressed for those of us who chose not to be shot up with whatever is in the syringes is how …
This was beautiful – mainstream science and medicine starting to question the Fauci BS. Revel in it. Some of this is now “accepted” – all of it will be, soon enough. We’re headed back to sanity, folks.
This is a very important video you don’t want to miss. It just came out, and the doctor is a guy I’ve been following. He chooses his words carefully, to stay inside the establishment where he can publish some of the top papers, but he speaks the truth at all times. Don’t let the video …
This is where I was blown away by the Pfizer leak out of Japan. The targeting of the ovaries.
AYE-YI-YI. What is one supposed to think? Good GRIEF.
TL;DR – you MUST listen to a short podcast of a scientist revealing the latest research on the spike protein vaccines. The VACCINE ITSELF (not just the spike protein – the mRNA vaccine itself) is persistent and is not only concentrating in ovaries – THE VACCINE ITSELF IS EXCRETED – e.g., in breast milk. Meaning …
Now you can see it very easily – the enemy threw that “Magnet Challenge” out to muddy the water as we were gaining understanding. But here is where I started to look at it experimentally – give it a real examination – and come away fairly doubtful that there is anything to it. The Magnet Challenge is bad science. It may be well-motivated, but it’s quality disinformation. Top-shelf stuff – ACTIVE DISINFORMATION to make people SELF-DISCREDIT – meant to insulate the controlled and groomed experts by discrediting smart people outside of controlled science.
Wherein we examine, in something like “MythBusters” style, the dubious “Magnet Challenge”, without relying (too much) on the anti-scientific crutch of scientific authority First, a confession. The main reason I am attracted to these videos of people sticking magnets to the COVID vaccination injection sites on their shoulders, is that I love to watch normal …
This is where I actually call out the other side for trying to mislead our side with the “Magnet Challenge”. At this point I really understand how utterly misleading this trick is, and WHY it was inflicted on us.
Wherein we look at how the COVID scammers are now using “magnetic” disinformation to try to escape justice for REAL abuse of liposome biotechnology to achieve [most likely contraceptive] vaccine persistence and migration. TL;DR – after mRNA vaccine persistence and anatomical migration were revealed in leaked Pfizer data, explaining “shedding” via persistent liposomes, the COVID …
This is where I investigate the origins of one of the “fake facts” used to trip up the doctors opposed to the spike protein mRNA vaccines. I am convinced that this was some kind of discreditation operation – a precursor to the “Magnet Challenge” psy-op.
This is for the historical record. I hope that this analysis gets to the “dissident scientists” involved, but even if it never does, future historians will get a powerful look at what I call “Fake Science” – the establishment’s phony, deceptive and controlled scientific complex – and how infiltration, control, and discreditation of dissident populist …
At this point, you should be ready for more information – about WHERE vaccination is going.
5.
New Vaccines – The Great Crony Blame Escape
It took me a while to put 2 and 2 together, but when I first saw the June 7 cover article on my new “vaccine snitch”, Chemical & Engineering News, something bothered me about it.
This is more excellent reporting by Ryan Cross, who routinely ferrets out (pun intended) the full story on virus science and vaccine technology, as available to “public science” – to be distinguished from the deeply hidden stuff. Cross never adds in any politics, crime, depolitical deconstruction, “conspiracy theory” speculation, or any of the things that are MY JOB. I have to respect that. This is the way THE NEWS used to be.
get the facts
understand the facts
teach the facts
teach the understanding
light fuse, run away
AH. I love my job. BE THE FUSE.
Figuring out the criminality of the government, industry, and financial backers – getting past the obscurantism, deceptions, and lies – that is OUR JOB – We The People – for we are (now that Merrick Garland soils the DOJ with Chicago communism) the
REAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
Yup. WE are not the communist insurrection and their corporate cronies, destroying everything in their path to money and power, including honest science and doctor-patient medicine.
We are (and like Confucius, I WANT them to hate this) the RESURRECTION.
The RESURRECTION vs. The INSURRECTION.
Eat your own label, insurrectionist commies. It’s good for you!
OK, back to science.
I really encourage you all to read this full article, which is written so that the general public can understand 99% of it easily. You will learn a LOT about vaccine technology. I will move you along through it, skipping over things, but when we’re done, consider reading the whole thing both WITH and FOR greater understanding.
I will try to only quote selectively from it, as I capture a few key points. But I can do no better than to give C&EN’s own “TL;DR” which they label “In brief“:
Vaccines are synonymous with shots, but it doesn’t have to be that way. More than a dozen groups are working on COVID-19 vaccines that can be squirted or sprayed into the nose instead of injected in the arm. Besides the potential practical advantage of easier administration, these vaccines could trigger the mucosal immune system to make antibodies in the nose and help stop the coronavirus at its point of entry. It sounds great, but the mucosal immune system is hard to study, and pharma companies have been reluctant to invest in the needle-free approach. Mucosal immunologists and intranasal vaccine developers are hoping the pandemic will change that.
This is where my first “2+2” $0.02 comes in.
Note the final statement:
Mucosal immunologists and intranasal vaccine developers are hoping the pandemic will change that.
It’s not the phony pandemic that is “going to” change delivery route. It’s already happening, in my opinion, due to the massive unveiling of not just the problems of the systemic gene therapy vaccines, but the clear motivations behind these vaccines, some of which were not just hidden from the public, but also from the scientific community, which I believe is now getting WISE.
Stated more simply, OUR PRESSURE in getting out the TRUTH about the existing vaccines is forcing the industry to react to vaccine shortcomings they WILL NOT ADMIT otherwise. The industry is likely also under forces from ABOVE THEM which are also being exposed.
You will see this as I go through the article.
The most powerful weapons in our hands are the UNDERSTANDINGS of the following:
spike protein toxicity
vaccine persistence
vaccine migration
spike genetic incorporation
Fauci’s reverse transcription obsession
Bill Gates’ “pre-programming the experts”
Zuckerberg connection to Baric lab
irrational hatred of cheap available therapeutics
generality of therapeutics being fought, thus…
the enabling of ChiCom manipulations
ovarian and testicular targeting
hiding of evolutionary knowledge
“circuits of plausibility” to create errors and crises
Put these things together and the “easy path” of systemic vaccines which do NOT mimic stimulation of natural immunity as well as NASAL VACCINES do, has been chosen under the cover of simplicity, but in reality because it always lies closer to what the industry TRULY wants, e.g., right now, gene therapies, where they NEED to target many specific organs. Nasal vaccination is a niche safety point which has always WAITED while systemic gets the action the deep backers want and NEED.
When it’s just easier and possible to do the wrong thing they want, they DO IT.
The current gene therapy desideratum – organ specificity – is actually in another article in the same issue of C&EN, talking about CRISPR, anti-CRISPR, and how to make gene therapy not have side effects, a point which is admitted more openly now that they are “safe on first” by having “proven” that gene therapy “works”.
Such a scam.
But it gets worse. Industry motives are not the motives of those who manipulate THEM.
As you read the rest of this, note that the “running dog” industry layer, which now performs for taskmaster commies, is also manipulated by THEIR true masters, the global elite, now looking at pesticides for humans, and particularly deplorables. It’s clear to me now, after the ovarian, placental, and testicular actions of the spike protein broke media containment, that the reason the entire vaccine industry jumped into full spike protein gene therapy tests masquerading as necessary vaccines is manipulation by the one guy who double-controls vaccine technology via “owning” CEPI – and that would be BILL GATES.
Yes, that Bill Gates, whose father is standing behind Fauci here.
Thus, when both the Gates Foundation and CEPI back some project, it’s Bill Gates getting TWO SCOOPS of control.
Note also Event 201 backing.
With Fauci and the Faucists inside government, and Bill Gates on the outside, there was no way that safer, metered, recombinant spike protein tech or peptide subunit tech was ever going to go first. They needed the new tech given a carte blanche, and they got it. This plus the “crisis” allowed the full spike protein’s foot to be shoved in America’s door, past everybody who might have questioned it.
This is one of the guys who spotted the “snake protein analogy” first, in what would have been time to alter the landscape.
No longer random, this is what happens when people get in the way of a conspiracy TWO LEVELS UP, where the really big boys and girls play. There are money motivations in between, but this guy’s real crime was potentially interfering with “the spike must flow”.
Have I raised your suspicions?
GOOD! Let’s look more deeply at the article now.
In fact, the mucosal membranes that line our airways, digestive systems, and reproductive tracts are often the first parts of our bodies to face an invading pathogen. A network of immune cells resides underneath our mucous membranes, or mucosae, and forms a front line of defense against invaders, and they prevent most infections from taking root. This is the mucosal immune system, and some immunologists think we have been seriously underestimating it.
“When you think about it, that’s where we acquire most of our infections: we inhale them, we consume them, or we get them through sex,” says Michael W. Russell, a mucosal immunologist and professor emeritus at the University at Buffalo.
This is where we begin to realize that mucosal immunity and systemic immunity are NOT the same thing. And it doesn’t have to be “either/or” – you can have BOTH. There are many plausible reasons for one over the other, but it will become clear that using the mucosal pathway adheres more strongly to the natural “API” of immunity by “contact”, if you will, with the pathogen, rather than sudden systemic introduction.
Have we really been underestimating it? Or have we been IGNORING IT ON PURPOSE at the highest motivational levels of power?
In my opinion, if the powers that be in VAXX WORLD would have been looking out for us all this time, there would have been stronger forces pushing researchers toward mucosal immunity. The problem is, that kind of naturalistic and patient-centered thinking is a problem for those who see vaccination as more of a path to power or other ends, particularly SOCIAL ends, rather than as part of a path to individual health. Nothing has made this more clear than the “pandemic”, controlled by “experts” who seemed not to know what they were doing.
Are you now starting to understand how and why conspiracies are intentionally mischaracterized as giant joint illicit cooperation, when they are in fact TOWERS OF LAYERS OF INTERNAL DECEPTIONS?
Good. Let’s move on.
Our mucosal immune cells make a special class of antibodies that are constantly secreted from the mucous membranes to protect the nose, gut, and other vulnerable sites from pathogens we’ve seen in the past. “But if you don’t stimulate the immune system in the mucosae, you don’t obtain mucosal immune responses,” says Pierre Charneau, head of the Molecular Virology and Vaccinology Unit at the Pasteur Institute.
Yet most research on SARS-CoV-2 and our immune systems has overlooked mucosal immunity in favor of the easier-to-study systemic immunity. “When the pandemic hit last year and I started to see papers coming out about immunity, it really quite staggered me to see an absence of attention to the mucosal immune response,” Russell says.
See that? The TILT of the field – the RUSH to systemic – that is a SOCIAL phenomenon – and socialists, or believers in the effectiveness of socialist tactics, like me – will tell you very honestly that science can be controlled SOCIALLY – that the SOCIAL aspects of science are not all warm campfires around each other’s blogs, but actually PART OF THE FIGHT that controls WHAT SCIENCE THINKS and WHAT SCIENCE DOES.
Or like this blog. I’m just honest about it.
I keep telling people that the “jabs” were PUSHED and SHAPED to be what they were – for REASONS – diverse yet all valid – which compromised all the insiders to DO WHAT WAS NEEDED to create what was needed at the TOP:
SYSTEMICALLY MOBILE, GONAD-TARGETING, SPIKE PROTEIN OVERDOSE INJECTIONS AT CONTRACEPTIVE LEVELS.
Stated more generally, it wasn’t a BUG – it was a FEATURE. And we were RUSHED into testing (if not USING) the feature ON PURPOSE.
Now – remember how COVER works – these vaccines did what they were SUPPOSED to do in our little world – but they also did what other people wanted in THEIR little and very exclusive world of “human benefactors”.
We move on.
Charneau and a group of scientists in Paris have shown that natural SARS-CoV-2 infections trigger both systemic and mucosal immunity. But our current crop of COVID-19 vaccines offer only systemic protection. Developing vaccines that are sprayed up the nose, rather than injected into the arm, could change that, Charneau says. Mucosal immunity in our noses could be like a guard at the door, potentially helping stop even small infections of SARS-CoV-2 right where they start.
It’s a tantalizing notion, but whether it’s a viable one is up for debate.
Now, the FIRST thing I think when I read this is “hey, that means my disease immunity is almost certainly BETTER than vaccine immunity – as doctors have all known for decades prior to COVID-19”.
Of course, we know they lied about that to “prevent vaccine hesitancy”. Or stated using different words, “to prevent picking the mild disease over the vaccine in the safer age groups, the latter being most of them”.
Do you see that? Almost ANY lie can be justified in the name of “overcoming vaccine hesitancy”. Who, besides Fauci and CDC is so obsessed with that Swiss army knife excuse and viral talking point?
But you know what – Fauci knew this – and Rand Paul knew Fauci knew this. So when Rand Paul went after Fauci on reinfection of COVID recoverees, like both HIM and ME, he knew Fauci was on THIN ICE.
But toss that all aside. At BEST, we went straight after systemic immunity “because emergency”. But it turned out that it wasn’t all that big of an emergency, and that’s where it gets interesting.
As I said, things are changing very rapidly now – obviously getting a technology on the cover of Chemical & Engineering News is a big deal.
And I quote:
After all, the pandemic provided a chance for messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine technology to finally prove its worth, and mucosal immunologists are hoping that this will be a moment for intranasal vaccines to do the same. “This climate is a game changer,” says Hiroshi Kiyono, codirector of the University of California San Diego Center for Mucosal Immunology, Allergy, and Vaccines. “This is a great opportunity to advance nasal vaccines, not just for COVID-19 but for other respiratory diseases.”
YUP. That’s the way CRISIS MECHANICS works. The “crisis” is just going to CHANGE, to get people to do a NEXT NEW WRONG THING.
My advice to Hiroshi Kiyono would be WATCH OUT – you are going to be subjected to many pressures that bring mucosal vaccines TOWARD viability as spike protein contraceptives. There will be pressure AWAY FROM doing what is best for the PATIENT, and TOWARD doing what is best for the SCIENCE and the RESEARCH, and that “better” will just happen to be better for surreptitious social or even sociobiological manipulations, too.
This is just a HEADS UP.
I’ve been there. Fake Science is not a very nice place to be when billions or trillions of dollars are on the line, and YOU’RE IN THE WAY.
At this point, the article goes into the HISTORY of intranasal vaccines, intranasal being one of the very best routes for respiratory virus vaccines. I’m going to SKIP over all that, even though there are some very interesting aspects to that history. I don’t really see any smoking guns of obstruction or sabotage, but it’s pretty clear that intranasal was a bit of a black sheep, and fended for itself.
Now, HERE is what’s interesting. Which intranasal vaccines are “in the pipeline”?
TURN YOUR NOSE UP
More than a dozen intranasal vaccines are in development for COVID-19. Here are several to keep an eye on.
Phase 1
Altimmune ▸ Adenoviral vector
AstraZeneca and University of Oxford ▸ Adenoviral vector
Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy, University of Hong Kong, and Xiamen University ▸ Live attenuated influenza virus vector
Bharat Biotech and Washington University in St. Louis ▸ Adenoviral vector
Codagenix and Serum Institute of India ▸ Live attenuated SARS-CoV-2
Laboratorio Avi-Mex and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai ▸ Live Newcastle disease virus vector
Meissa Vaccines ▸ Live attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vector
Preclinical
AuraVax and University of Houston ▸ Recombinant spike protein with adjuvant
HanaVax and University of Tokyo ▸ Recombinant spike protein with adjuvant
TheraVectys and Pasteur Institute ▸ Lentiviral vector
University of Eastern Finland and University of Helsinki ▸ Adenoviral vector
Sources: Companies, World Health Organization.
Now, that may not look like much, but there is a TON to unpack, because we not only have OLD “new” technologies in a NEW route – we have NEW “new” technologies to explain – and in a new route.
If you don’t think the other side can cause trouble with their spike protein attack through the nose, you are sorely underestimating the ability of those who CONTROL SCIENCE to “get there first” and mislead the rest of the pack.
Remember – if you think like me, then you know people have been doing this crap for billions of years in THIS universe alone. We’re just “rediscovering reality under supervision” on one more planet. The lies are OLD. Very, very OLD. And as I like to say, “Satan weaponizes everything.”
The adenoviral vectors we’ve seen. That’s AstraZeneca, Johnson+Johnson, Sputnik V, and others. The only difference is that they’re going through the nose, where these viruses are actually supposed to go.
There is a LOT of possibility that this move could solve the biggest problems with these vaccines. IF the nasal delivery route is a kind of highly evolved and intelligent natural “attenuation gauntlet” for viruses, then the outcomes for these vaccines could be uniformly improved.
IF that is indeed the case, then I’m going to be a “toldjaso” asshole and use this as part of my explanation of why “they” have divided us in the specific way they have, over the topic of evolution, separating the “intelligence” side from the “evolutionary science” side, thus pushing the latter to view evolution as DUMB instead of “cautiously and obsessively path-checking”, which looks dumb to localized intelligence that doesn’t know how to keep its biases in its own lane.
These vaccines also introduce lentiviral vectors – pretty much the same thing as the adenoviral vectors, just a different virus. Again, this is new, so it could be interesting.
Another returning technology is Recombinant spike protein with adjuvant. That is basically Novavax, which we have not really had a chance to deconstruct, because there is not yet much public information on safety or efficacy. So a big QUESTION MARK on that one. In principle this should be safer than genetic technologies, both because there are ZERO risks of genomic incorporation (see Jaenisch for SARS-CoV-2 incorporation), and because there are no possibilities of unmetered “fountaining” of spike protein.
First up in technologies we have NOT seen yet: Live attenuated SARS-CoV-2.
We have already used INACTIVATED SARS-CoV-2 – that would include the Chinese Sinovac vaccine, which is rebranded as CoronaVac in the West. I’ve been cautioning that I believe “bad lots” of CoronaVac, which are incompletely inactivated, have been passed off, which would explain why there is typically a surge in cases right when countries start using CoronaVac. Obviously that’s good for business, and we know how Chinese business works. The only other explanation would be that PCR is picking up vaccine during rollout, and I’m half-way thinking that’s a better explanation, were I not so familiar with ChiComs and the corruption they spread.
However, we have NOT yet seen live attenuated virus. This could be GREAT – or it could have a whole NEW bag of problems. I’m very “wait and see” on this.
The real BIGGIES of the new intranasal vaccines are these:
Live attenuated influenza virus vector
Live Newcastle disease virus vector
Live attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vector
Unlike the adenoviral vector vaccines, which are basically “working but dead mRNA in a dead skin suit of a different virus that’s easy to work with”, these vectors are LIVE VIRUSES with “something extra” (like the spike protein) inserted into their genes, making them chimeric at the genetic level, not just the vector level.
These vaccine viruses are actually designed to “run a bit”. They INFECT YOU with instructions to crank out spike protein.
This is where things start getting weird, and it’s hard to trust a world which contains both THIS technology AND the CCP.
You know what I’m sayin’?
But now let’s look at all these. We suddenly have a LOT of vaccines to keep track of.
It’s gonna take some work – but we have to do it. We cannot let them keep experimenting on us like they did, while CHINA did almost NO “experimentation” on its people.
Understand what I’m sayin’?
Good.
Now – the rest of the article is basically the HOPES and the NOPES of the intranasal route. Some of the possibilities here are MIND-BOGGLINGLY GOOD.
Mucosal immune cells constantly make an antibody called secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA), which gets released into the mucous membranes of the nose, mouth, airways, and gut. Pound for pound, we produce more IgA than any other antibody, Russell says, although most of it is broken down and sneezed, coughed, or pooped out within a few days.
And critically, while injected vaccines induce only systemic immunity, vaccines delivered to mucosal sites can induce both systemic and mucosal immunity, he says.
That fact is evident in animal studies of a vaccine being developed by David T. Curiel and Michael Diamond at Washington University in St. Louis. Both the injected and intranasal forms of their vaccine triggered the production of IgG antibodies, but only the intranasal route triggered mucosal immune cells to secrete IgA that blocked the virus from replicating in the nose. A day after they published preprint data demonstrating as much in July 2020, the Indian vaccine company Bharat Biotech contacted the university’s technology-transfer office to license the intranasal vaccine in India, where it is being tested in a clinical trial. “How that will play out clinically remains to be seen,” Curiel says. “But this animal model finding suggests, qualitatively, that we have some additional benefit.”
It is very clear that – for a respiratory disease – there is an advantage to having “naturally obtained” respiratory mucosal immunity.
All that said, we’re still talking spike protein. But if the intranasal route can keep it out of the ovaries, testicles, and placenta – GREAT.
And THAT brings me to another great C&EN report by Ryan Cross – everything you want to know and need to know about those damned lipid nanoparticles.
Without these lipid shells, there would be no mRNA vaccines for COVID-19
Fragile mRNA molecules used in COVID-19 vaccines can’t get into cells on their own. They owe their success to lipid nanoparticles that took decades to refine
Without doing any “gotcha” journalism, Cross reveals the GOOD, the BAD, and the UGLY about these lipid nanoparticles.
The impression I get is that this field was dogged with problems, most of which were overcome, but not all.
So, without getting into the details, all these criticisms of the lipid nanotech that you are hearing are NOT “conspiracy theories” – the scientists are TALKING ABOUT THEM as real problems they’re trying to solve, with various degrees of success, in this report.
To me, it was very clear that people WAY above these scientists needed to PUSH this LNP (lipid nanoparticle) technology, necessary for GENE THERAPY, into acceptance using the phony plague.
If you don’t want to take this stuff, STAND UP for your rights. Otherwise, it’s over the hill, the horses are OUT OF THE BARN, the fence is open and the cattle are GONE.
BUT – I think that if we keep pushing the REALITIES of these vaccines, we can make the “mandate martinets” crawl back into their Fuehrer Bunkers and leave us alone.
And THAT is worth it.
W
PSSSST – hey, DOJ and FBI. Want to see some audit results?
THEY’RE EXPLOSIVE!
Seriously, you injustice-perpetuating assholes deserve to be trolled. Your phony allegations of “violence” or even potential violence by the QAnon “believers” are an affront to Americans. They’re a SICKNESS coated with a patina of professionalism. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
The title is a simple question that I am finding has much power to explain things.
I’m going to leave this a little bit “loose”, so that everybody can “jiggle it into place”.
If I just say “that guy was a crisis actor!” as evidence, or even just “potential evidence”, we get away from the real point, even if it’s TRUE that the guy WAS a “crisis actor”.
Or even more shockingly, WAS NOT.
See what I mean? (Bill Aldenberg was put in charge of Durham’s “spygate” investigations.) Sometimes the TRUTH becomes even more shocking LATER, when we pursue it, leading to MORE TRUTH.
If I say “they’re giving saline injections for [REASON X]”, what if I’m wrong and it’s [REASON Y]? Or what if “saline injections” is as much of a distracting and discrediting psy-op as “magnetic injections”?
Or what if – “AND” LOGIC – it’s BOTH?
BUT – if I “come in from the TOP”, and say this….
What if the reason Democrats and China and Bill Gates and Fauci are “collaborating” on their phony plague to introduce a weird uterus-flushing “vaccine” is actually some kind of “world crisis response” to a problem these people are certain is a world-destroying threat?
(Listen for the “admission”…..)
Video Player
Media error: Format(s) not supported or source(s) not found
What if Democrats don’t just posit and “react” to their phony alleged crises in the open, but also by secret programs that are a lot harder to get rid of, or turn off?
It sure would explain why leftists in government have to keep making these ridiculous public statements about “threats” that absolutely don’t appear to have any validity to normal people – nor even to scientists who are “cut out of the loops” – both the loops of being “informed” AND of being “under control”.
And OH YEAH, there is a lot of POLITICAL ADVANTAGE in doing that, because of CLASSIFICATION automatically providing COVER and a kind of built-in legitimacy by mere existence as a ‘classified’ matter.
You can talk back to a bill moving through Congress. You can’t talk back to a classified program.
That would even apply to the freaking HOAX against Trump. Not to say WHICH HOAX.
In my opinion, the sleazy Democrats HAVE to be doing this. And if CHINA is involved, at the deepest levels, “because it’s a global problem” – well, yeah.
Kind of explains why all the opposition to TRUMP – right?
“OH, NOES! Our classified save-the-world ‘baby’ is gonna END!”
The easiest way to get people to commit ERROR is to convince them that it is for GOOD.
The easiest way to make sure the error STICKS is to make it SECRET FROM THE GIT-GO.
I’m not saying that everybody has the same motivations in a giant project – especially a “secret” project – THEY DON’T.
Some people get into it for MONEY. Some get in for POWER. Some people just GO ALONG. Many people are just excited to be IN ON IT. And some people just want to have some fun.
Some people – and SCIENTISTS routinely fall for this crap – get involved because they’re FLATTERED. They butter up easily, and once they’re in, they don’t like to admit that they made a mistake. That is a big part of how the Chinese “Thousand Talents” program works, to get world scientists to switch their professional allegiance to CHINA.
Now CHINA is very smart, and prefers – like Obama – to “lead from behind”. We make fun of that Obama statement, but it’s actually a power statement to those who understand that Obama is “foolin’ ya” when he says he’s “leading from behind”.
“Leading from behind” works like this.
Posit a problem.
Get somebody else to accept that there is (or even might be) a problem.
Hint toward a solution.
Get somebody else to “come up with” your solution.
Praise them for YOUR solution they think is theirs.
Encourage them to carry out that solution.
Encourage others to find similar solutions.
This is a total euphemism for very sneaky and deceptive leadership. And it IS leadership.
So when China talks about “soft power”, understand that “soft power” is more akin to saying “we’re gonna cut off all avenues of exit”, rather than “we’re gonna be nice about things”.
You starting to see how this works? They love to UNDERSTATE.
Now – there seem to be ways to spot these projects.
leaders make phony political virtue signals to these problems that make no sense to normies
the projects make “committing moves” where people get into potential trouble that makes them double or triple down
“good” people do weird things that seem both stupidly wrong and out of character when they get caught
In my mind, the reason we see these things is that the leftists are ABUSING classification. It’s one thing to hide intelligence or defense matters. It’s quite another to hide some creepy “create gun problems to end gun problems” program.
The beauty of this kind of program is that it is basically “training wheels for conspirators”. You can’t convince most people to take part in a program to spread a virus that creates an avenue to sterilize people – THAT is just “no way”.
But if I came to you, and said “your country needs your skills to help save the world”, would you resist?
Don’t just be afraid of China’s “Thousand Talents” program. Keep an eye out for Obama’s “Million Talents” program. I think it’s there, and I think there are more than just one or two of them.
W
The media controls the science, no matter what scientists think they know.
PS
I want to thank Aubergine for THIS COMMENT which motivated me to “finish” my thoughts on this into a publishable form. You can go to that link to read the full context, but the more general point which Aubergine posited, is to ask if maybe the incidents of people “accidentally” getting “saline injections” instead of the COVID jabs they thought they were getting, might in fact be of a scientific nature.
These “saline jabs” are a real thing – some people getting saline instead of actual COVID jabs. The question is – HOW OFTEN? There have indeed been a few documented instances. Obviously in a huge project, one expects accidents. Forgetting to pump injectable saline into the lyophilized (freeze-dried) vaccine before injection is an understandable error, and should happen accidentally NO MATTER WHAT.
BUT – I have read about TWO instances where nurses who administered saline gave excuses when CAUGHT. In one case, the nurse said they were opposed to the COVID vaccines. Clearly THAT would be malpractice. People are entitled to get the drug they want – even if it’s risky.
In the other case, the nurse said that they had accidentally SPOILED a lot of vaccine, and rather than risk giving the spoiled vaccine, they covered up by administering saline.
I’m not sure I believe that second one, and I’m not even a 100% believer of the first.
Once a person lies, I become suspicious even of their corrected admission. This policy works well for everybody from naughty children to probable Chinese spies.
Deplorable Patriot has posited that the saline jabs are being used to help cover up vaccines that are showing too many side effects. That is not entirely unbelievable. I have an upcoming article on new developments in COVID vaccines, and the way that the tech is developing, leads me to believe that they are moving in ways that will reduce side effects, but (and this is very important) THEY ARE NOT ADMITTING THIS.
Let me repeat that. It’s scientifically obvious that the industry is responding to the dangers of the vaccines, but they are not admitting that this is the motivation for their response.
Yes. The industry is moving toward different vaccine technology that seems likely to have fewer side effects, AND possibly less OVERALL (systemic) immunity. BUT at the same time, that technology will require MORE vaccinations. So it’s SMART if you’re the industry. AND it’s actually smart science.
But the point is, the industry is reacting in the same way that they would be if CDC was secretly instructing “read-in” administration centers to give saline to the riskier patients as a kind of temporary “mid-stream correction” to an overly aggressive vaccine, WITHOUT scaring people away from vaccination, which seems to be a [WRONG-HEADED] “prime directive” at CDC. CDC has already lied to us about people getting the disease after vaccination, when CLEARLY the terrible PCR test is picking up the vaccine itself – which it MUST in theory. And which it does for quite a while, because the vaccine itself turns out to be WAY more persistent than it SHOULD BE – a fact that they HID.
The “COVID after vaccination” thing is not just an obvious lie, when vaccine RNA should set off PCR tests – it is such a fundamental flaw in the protocol, it simply has to be intentional at SOME level in the controlling bureaucracy.
And we KNOW there are people in the controlling bureaucracy, like Rick Bright, who ABUSE their positions based on AGENDA. It turns out that Rick Bright not only sabotaged HCQ – he sabotaged EIDD-2801, a new drug which is orally active, unlike remdesivir. He was so “behind” the vaccines that he threw monkey wrenches into early treatments of all kinds.
Bottom line – CDC can’t be trusted. BUT they seem to be motivated by the left’s morality, which is that “lying is OK, as long as it’s for the good of the listener”. So – the only thing we really need to change to make “saline injections” understandable, and BELIEVABLE, is to give them a positive moral raison d’être used on participants at SOME level.
That is where Aubergine’s idea hit me like lightning. Even if it is not strictly true that they are “studying” people “in the wild” with saline controls, THAT is the exact clinical mentality of a secret project, once it is underway. That is how you COULD get people to do such things.
But then once that morality is on the table, Dep Pat’s idea makes sense, too.
I COULD EVEN ARGUE IT MYSELF FOR THE CDC, PRETENDING TO BE NEUTRON NANCY (“Radium” Rod Rosenstein’s sister, Nancy Messonnier, who just retired, by the way, thank goodness).
“The vaccine is too strong. People will be getting boosters later. They will be getting safer, second-generation vaccines. We can’t increase vaccine hesitancy by admitting the full spike protein is too strong. FOR NOW, for the riskiest patients who want a vaccine but are contraindicated, just give them saline. The numbers of reactions will also fall, and that is a benefit. Remember – vaccine hesitancy is the MOST IMPORTANT THING. It must be avoided at ALL COSTS.”
Of course, if one did this, one might also feel, based on MORALITY, that one would have to recommend continued mask wear, “to do all one could”, lest the “saline-vaccinated” get the ACTUAL disease and expire.
Make sense now? “Positive leftist deception morality” explains quite a bit. One only needs to ask WHICH LEVEL OF COMPROMISE people are “bought in”. Nursing Home Killer is obviously bought in at a higher level – probably “overpopulation” – where “more bodies now” may be necessary to “fix the terrible problem”, rather than just a few “white lies”.
See? This is for their own good! I should get a secret medal from Obama!
*ROLLS EYES*
Yeah. That is where we are now.
Making sense? It does to me. Lies upon lies upon lies upon lies.
“For our own good.”
And made “acceptable” by BLESSED SECRECY.
SO – in my opinion – we may have more luck positing the left’s deceptions as “morally righteous” than “wickedly insidious”.
Although, I will admit, sometimes “wickedly insidious” is more fun.
Another post discussed how – for whatever reasons are quietly embedded upon the length of the full spike protein and fragments thereof, chimeric or not – we are also now cursed with what appears to be, to some [currently socially tolerable] extent, an abortion virus and abortion vaccines.
Trust me – THAT is a trumpet that BRINGS DOWN WALLS.
We may even have a scientifically sound explanation for the craziest reports of vaccine side effects in the close but unvaccinated – namely, hormonal activities that are operating at the low microgram level.
Oxytocin – abortion dose = 10-30 IU = 16-50 mcg
Let me explain how that works. Think “DUST”.
I can tell you all about the potency of carfentanil. ONE BREATH of inhaled dust containing a tiny amount of it knocked me out like a roundhouse to the left jaw. If that ENTIRE DUST had been carfentanil, I would have been DEAD. But there was a fraction – a tiny fraction – of that tiny grain you see right there, that got into my lungs, riding on OTHER DUST, and I was OUT LIKE A LIGHT.
NOW you understand the POWER of the spike protein.
Yes, there is SO MUCH that they HIDE FROM US to maintain POWER OVER US.
However, now I want to put ALL of this virology technology into DEEP PERSPECTIVE.
“Black goo” biological agent in the movie Prometheus, part of the “Alien” franchise.
What I am going to tell you is almost certain to shock you – both about the disease and about the vaccine. It shocked me. That’s why I figured I had to explain this to people.
And what’s even WEIRDER – this is not totally about the disease or the vaccines, but also about their CONTEXT, which forces you to SEE them both differently and more CLEARLY.
A while back, I was just browsing the “edutainment” about viruses on the internet, when I was led down an interesting rabbit hole of viruses in entomology. You know – INSECTS. I read something on Wikipedia which bothered me, so I set it aside. It all seemed FAR too familiar. It surely impacted all this crap we’re going through now – I just wasn’t sure how. Later I came back and read it again.
Now, I understand. It’s actually rather beautiful. But – well – it’s interesting.
The greatest point being – THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN.
The great irony of the idea “nothing new under the sun” is the self-referential part – the idea that EVEN this little bit of wisdom is with certainty not even attributable to its first alleged “author”, who HIMSELF surely understood the great irony of his saying it, and that others might attribute it to him, someday.
Nothing new under the sun. This bit of Solomonian passed-on wisdom about the curation rather than creation of wisdom is far truer than I realized. Let’s EXPAND just a bit.
The idea that this universe is as old as it appears to be, and that in all that time, Einstein was the first person (using the term rather broadly) to discover the logic of how speed actually works, strikes me as a violation of Solomon’s logic about “first discovery” being rare as hen’s teeth.
Likewise, Solomon’s logic goes further and tells me that “hen’s teeth” undoubtedly happened a lot more often than, when in its earthly rarity, it happened “here and almost now”, but seemingly only roughly once.
Rarity being somewhat relative, with distance providing a deceptive but effective cover for number and frequency, all of them together being a control of wisdom over knowledge.
Yet even these seeming corollaries of the idea of “nothing new under the sun” are just repeats of the idea with some frill on the edges enlightened for our benefit.
“…it is curiosity that gives meaning and savour to life.”
LIFE. Seems to be part of the design. No?
Have I BOTHERED you yet?
Maybe even a bit of trepidation – or even FEAR?
Good. THAT has happened before. “Nothing new under the sun.”
You can never go wrong with Solomon.
The Last Time Gene Therapy Was Reinvented
I keep trying to tell people – DNA is very smart. We are slowly learning how to talk to it. Sometimes we actually listen. Sometimes we even plagiarize.
DNA bargains and wheedles its way into the future, changing in whatever ways it has to, to keep itself alive. It gains as much vision of the future and the past that it can, using proteins, to persist as well as it can.
Think of it this way. DNA fights and feuds with DNA, but who wins in the end?
DNA.
NOTHING that these foolish young humans are trying to do with their coronaviruses, their “vaccines”, and their “gene therapy” is new to DNA. DNA came up with ALL of this stuff – AGAIN – at least 100 million years ago. THAT was its destiny. Ironically repeating like its own form.
I am absolutely serious. The technology of EVERY one of our wonderful new coronavirus vaccines (or “injections” or “gene therapies”, if you prefer) was RE-invented by DNA approximately 70-100 million years ago on this planet, and is still around.
ONE example of a prior reinvention of gene therapy resides in a tiny biological war-game where THREE organisms cut a deal that keeps them all alive. I will point out all of the “original versions” to you, and you will see where human science basically plagiarized.
One of the three organisms is an insect – a kind of wasp – that gravitated into using a living host for reliable reproduction. The second is a voracious plant-predatory host insect – a caterpillar – that needs a dependent predator to keep its numbers in steady balance, because it won’t do it itself. The third is a virus that found a way to survive by helping insure that the host-guest “life transfer” process always succeeded, so that it, too, would survive.
DNA uses ALL OF THEM to optimally persist.
The key to understanding all of this, is a kind of virus called a “polydnavirus”. I personally like to pronounce that “Poe-LID-na-virus”, even though that is wrong. They’re actually supposed to be called “Polly-D-N-A-virus”. My advice is pick whatever you like – you’re probably never going to have to say the word publicly – and on the internet, your canine pronunciation is always perfect.
Or just call them PDVs.
Wikipedia’s entry for them is an excellent place to start.
The bottom line is very simple. The wasp lays its eggs INSIDE a caterpillar by injection. However, instead of injecting a mere venom along with the egg – a kind of chemical weapon – the wasp injects a venom containing a VIRUS – a biological weapon. The virus provides biological effects like immune suppression that HELP the wasp egg survive, hatch, and grow. This is much more efficient than merely injecting, say, immunosuppressive proteins in the venom. The immune suppression by the virus prevents immune response by caterpillar cells known as hemocytes.
All of that is shown in the following graphic.
Here is one of the first really fascinating aspects of these polydnaviruses. When they are in the wasp, they are actually PART of the wasp genome. That’s right. They’re IN THE WASP’S CHROMOSOMES. The virus is now PART of the wasp’s genetics. One could even view it as the wasp sending PART OF ITS OWN GENES into the host, to make sure that the egg survives.
When the virus is still inside the wasp, it only comes out of the genes and reproduces in one place, in FEMALE wasps, near where the eggs are formed. It doesn’t harm the wasp, because DNA is NOT stupid. Viral DNA learned – the hard way – don’t shoot the pilot. Just stay in your seat until it’s time to debark. Wasp DNA learned – the hard way – let the jihadists sleep until we get to the airport we want them to shoot up. All of it mediated through the most annoying code in the world, with zero comments and nearly inscrutable, almost accidental language.
You remember those “well, it works” phone calls, coders. “I don’t know. Try this.”
Now – the next point is even cooler – because it’s the exact same strategy as the coronavirus vaccines that use viral vectors (e.g., Johnson+Johnson, Oxford/AstraZeneca, Sputnik V).
The infection does not lead to replication of new viruses, rather it affects the caterpillar’s immune system, as the virion carries virulence genes instead of viral replication genes.[4] They can be considered a type of viral vectors.[5]
The virus particles that are sent into the caterpillar are NOT reproductive – they are merely infective. They don’t code for creation of new virus, which might reproduce exponentially and kill the host or use up too many resources. Instead, the infective non-reproductive virus particles – just like the coronavirus vaccines – give a nice, predictable amount of expression of new proteins, useful for the wasp eggs and larvae to prosper. The virus basically CONSERVES caterpillar so that it has a ticket and a ride OUT of the dead caterpillar when it’s all over.
That’s the EXACT same strategy as our mRNA and DNA vaccines. Don’t crank out too much spike protein, by cranking out any new virus, and thereby kill the host. The main point is SAVING the host. The point may also be STERILIZING the host, to some extent, because THAT protein effect is beneficial to the injecting parasites known as the Democrat Party, globalist banks, and China. And probably more than one type of pencilneck. But they do want us to live – at least for some time, it would appear.
But seriously – the wasp polydnavirus immunosuppression strategy IS the human adenovirus vaccination strategy.
The only difference is what the proteins that are created DO. In the caterpillar, they suppress the immune system response to the egg or larva. In humans, the one protein stimulates antibodies to itself, and possibly does other things which are intended or not.
So you may be wondering how the virus gets from parent wasp to child wasp if the virus that is sent into the caterpillar host is not reproductive. AHA. It is because the virus is tucked into the GENOME of the baby wasp, safe and sound, for a ride into the future. The virus genome is essentially protected by the wasp.
Thus, you can see how genetic incorporation of the VIRUS benefits BOTH the wasp and the virus – and even – in a weird way – the caterpillar. The wasp gets to control the genetics and expression of the virus, so that they don’t cause the wasp too much trouble, but instead yield maximum benefit. The virus can then be more effective at its now exclusively delegated task of immune suppression in the caterpillar, by relinquishing reproduction to the wasp. Division of labor creates a great mutual dependency, but it also creates a strong contract.
One could say that genetic incorporation is a STRONGER CONTRACT between the virus and the wasp.
Just like genetic incorporation of COVID-19 spike protein could be a STRONGER CONTRACT of reduced human fertility.
But how does the caterpillar benefit?
The caterpillar is not going to live on as THAT particular caterpillar, but THAT particular baby caterpillar-culling wasp will live on in an assured 1:1 trade-off, and the REST of the caterpillars which benefit by the current culling will also live on as a stable population. The C-W-V balance is maintained BETTER by seeking a more stable chaotic resonance, without the wild swings of boom and bust, if wasp reproduction and population can be more closely tied to the caterpillar population, and they all live into the future without wild swings in numbers.
Another way to view it from the caterpillar perspective, is that viral efficiency minimizes the number of sacrificial caterpillars needed to keep the necessary number of wasps alive.
Now – we’ve seen viral vector vaccines analogous to the non-reproductive but infective polydnavirus virus particles – those would be the Johnson-+Johnson, AstraZeneca, and Sputnik V vaccines, which use adenoviral vectors for non-reproducing, protein-creating, virus DNA. But what about the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines?
Well, it turns out that these {{{wasps + viruses}}} invented ANOTHER way to get DNA or RNA into the caterpillar host – those are called VLP, for “virus-like particles”. There is a lot of range and variability here, just as there is in non-viral-vector vaccine technology. So in the same way that the Pfizer, Moderna and Inovio vaccines use proprietary “virus-like lipid droplet nanotechnology” to get their mRNA or DNA into human cells and thus cranking out spike protein, wasp/virus DNA can also use a strategy of “virus-like particles” that don’t even mimic non-working viruses, and STILL get their effective DNA transferred to the caterpillar, to effect the desired expression of needed wasp/virus proteins in the caterpillar.
Now – that is not to say that PDV (polydnaviruses) and VLP (virus-like particles) are the only tricks up the ovipositors of these parasitic wasps. It turns out that – in addition to these well-described DNA viruses, there are also apparently RNA viruses which ride along with wasp eggs during injection. So YES – both DNA and RNA “vaccines” are part of the wasp injections. And YES – there can be genetic incorporation in the caterpillar cells – for their short lifespan – just as there is already genetic incorporation, long-term, in the wasps.
Remember – who wins? DNA WINS. The HOUSE always wins.
But don’t forget Novavax! It may just be protein, but protein shills for DNA!
Not only are the Novavax “pseudo-viral protein-based nanoparticles” already examples of virus-like particles – they are matched by protein-based components of the wasp venom, both free-floating or otherwise. Indeed, one cannot read about the virus-like spiked particles in this wasp venom and not think that Novavax design is pretty much the same thing.
NOW – this is all a LOT to unpack. Not just that, but my “dumbing it down” probably made it just plain dumber. To correct that, I’m going to let the experts FIX THINGS UP.
The field of polydnaviruses in insects is NOT a huge field. It’s actually rather obscure, despite the phenomenal importance we are witnessing now. Just as the media can help those in power hype and control a field like climate science, or literally HIDE certain other fields like [[[ COUGH ]]], they can obscure still other fields which radically affect you, by hiding them pretty much in plain sight.
There is a BOOK that reviews the field, however, which is EXTREMELY helpful.
You can download parts of this book, and that includes TWO parts which are more than enough for a reasonably smart normal person to see the CONTEXT EXPLAINED.
Let me get ONE of those parts out of the way because you’re not going to be interested in this, unless you’re ready to get VERY nerdy on the history of science. But I am including it because it is AMAZING STUFF. You might view this as “The history of the science of the rediscovery of all the evolutionarily discovered technology used in the “vaccines” or “shots” or “gene therapy” of the coronavirus genetic injections”. It’s a beautiful window into HOW SCIENCE WORKS.
You can download a PDF of this at the linked page.
Now – if you read that – you will get a LOT, including a window into the slow and painful nature of research, but it’s a bit difficult to extract the good stuff if you’re not used to reading scientific review literature.
In contrast, the PREFACE of the book is MUCH easier to read, and it puts ALL this stuff in context that normal humans who are not experts in polydnaviruses can understand.
I highly encourage you to read the full preface at the linked page. But what I’m going to do here is simply pull out all kinds of juicy quotes – which is damn near the whole thing. [ My comments ] and identified WOW sequences will be in bold.
Here we go – this is all quoting:
Among parasitoid viruses, the fascinating models of polydnaviruses (PDVs) were discovered in the 1970s and the new field of polydnavirology was thus opened.
This field has been moving very fast since the beginning of the century thanks to the use of genomic approaches and rapid expansion of accessible databases on insect and viral gene sequences.
Parasitoid and viral genomic studies have confirmed that PDVs are functionally gene transfer agents used by parasitoid wasps to manipulate the physiology of their parasitized lepidopteran hosts by introducing modified versions of their own genes into host cells.
In the case of PDVs from braconid wasps, this kind of gene therapy (detrimental for the patient, which is in this case the lepidopteran host!) originated from the integration of a virus genome in a wasp genome ca. 100 million years ago. [LOL – I just noticed this “being impressed by the date” part – looks like we BOTH realized this independently. -Wolf]
This virus has been modified to incorporate wasp genes instead of its own viral genome in the nucleocapsids inside the viral particles. [Minor beef here – ownership and original genetic penmanship on the payload could be more “virus” and less “wasp” – interesting problem.]
Such use of viruses as vectors has been selected several times independently during the evolution of parasitoid wasps. [There it is. VIRAL VECTORS. Invented by DNA.]
The PDVs associated with braconid and ichneumonid wasps (Campopleginae subfamily) are unrelated as judged from the machinery producing the particles, and they represent an example of convergent evolution with different viral origins.
A third association event is suspected to have occurred in the Banchinae subfamily of ichneumonid wasps. In essence, the parasitoids have ‘captured’ viral elements that have evolved a host regulatory role that benefits the parasitoid to facilitate successful parasitism. [This is more “archaeopteryx” on the payload being of viral origin.]
Other associations with viruses or virus-like particles might have evolved with different organisms but they have not been unraveled yet, and parasitic amoebae that have associations with mammalian viruses are just one example. [“Lots of room at the bottom.”]
Many insects have evolved associations with a large number of species of bacteria such as Wolbachia and associations with viruses have been less well studied to date compared to bacterial symbionts.
A number of different viruses are found in the genital tract of the parasitoid wasps and conceivably they could be transferred to female wasps by behavioral traits, such as host feeding, initiated following ovipositor puncture of the surface of the integument.
Host feeding may thus be an advantageous behavior for viruses which facilitates their spread within insect populations and this intimate association with viruses might have favored interactions leading in some cases to integration of viral sequences into the wasp genome, although most of the wasps described in this book are no longer host feeders.
These viruses include RNA viruses of insect parasitoids and most of them appear nonpathogenic. Could these likewise have evolved a symbiotic relationship with their host? Future research may reveal such an intimate relationship with the wasp host carrying them but, currently, we have little information about their functional role as symbionts or pathogens in the virus–wasp–insect host relationship. [This was in 2012 – the situation could be different now.]
While the study of polydnaviruses was initially inspired by the pioneering studies of George Salt and Susan Rotheram at Cambridge University, more recent studies of Venturia (formerly Nemeritis) canescens particles (the virus-like agent studied by George Salt) by Otto Schmidt and Sassan Asgari documented that these virus-like virions lack both DNA and RNA; the particles are comprised of proteins encoded by parasitoid genes. [This is basically virus-like particle nanotechnology akin to the Novavax vaccine.]
The multiplicity of different molecular forms seen in these viruses and virus-like particles is truly amazing but, compared to polydnaviruses, we have less information about the biology of virus-like particles and how they function. [There is clearly an infinitude of possibility here – clearly WHY the push for gene therapy.]
Finally, not all parasitoid species are associated with viruses and most in this category have to rely on virulence factors produced by their ovaries and venom glands instead of using the host to produce them like for PDV-encoded gene products. [Translation – most of the wasps use plain old venom.]
PDV-associated species also produce venom that was shown in some cases to synergize the effect of the virus. [Combination biological and chemical weaponry.]
New sequencing approaches are more comprehensive and will thus allow comparisons of the arsenal of proteins used in different species, which will enhance our understanding of the dynamics of evolution of parasitoid virulence strategies. [Big data will allow spying on the past to happen even faster.]
Ectoparasitic wasps have not been examined yet for the presence of viral symbionts, and appear to have exploited venoms as a source of host regulatory molecules instead. Comparative studies on paralyzing versus nonparalytic venoms are lacking, and screening ectoparasitic species for viral elements should also be a future research priority. [Translation: there’s more to learn from regular stinging / paralyzing wasps.]
In addition to enhancing our knowledge of parasitoid strategies and increasing our understanding of the importance of symbiotic relationships in species evolution, parasitoid viruses and venoms may constitute a source of new molecules to control insect pests. This might be a revolutionary outcome of research on PDVs and other parasitoid viruses, since the safety of many chemical pesticides with respect to their detrimental impacts on human health and key species in the environment such as bees and other beneficial insects, is questioned. [You think proteins are going to be safer? HA! Get ready for new problems.] We anticipate that harvesting biopesticidal molecules from parasitoid venoms will likewise prove fruitful. [Translation: All this human wasp techno coronavirus lying crap is headed to agriculture, and presumably already there. Yeah.]
Finally, we hope that this book will satisfy the reader by presenting an overview of the most recent findings on all these topics presented by an international assemblage of authors. [You can say that again!]
In addition, we aim to inspire many future researchers to choose polydnavirology or studies of other parasitoid viruses or viral-like elements and venoms as their focus field. [You’ve inspired me, even though it’s a bit late for me to enroll in one more Marxist university.]
That’s it.
I tell you – this whole thing was a revelation. Suddenly, everything these people in Big Pharma have been doing has been HUMBLED BY GOD, using BUGS. LOL! Pretty amazing.
And being humbled, all of us, the TRUTH now becomes clear.
Now – if all this seems a bit scary, but you’re thinking “Hey, this isn’t exactly like our case, in which Democrats mind-fracked their victims with an RNA virus” – well, HOLD YOUR BEERS. With God – IRONICALLY – all things are possible.
Yes, this, too – baffling the victim with an RNA virus – was borrowed from nature, although I am being just a wee bit facetious, since it was done much more intelligently and much more socially against a more intelligent and social species.
The Case of the Shanghaied Babysitter
Yeah, I’ll try to keep this one shorter, but I don’t really have to go back TOO MUCH to the original literature here.
Here is where I FOUND this case originally. An article that was COPIED onto a forum.
This is actually a very long and complete scientific article. Let me give you the “TL;DR” version.
When the wasp lays an egg in the ladybug, it also injects an RNA virus. That virus makes the ladybug go “mask Karen” crazy, and stick around and GUARD the pupated larval wasp after it emerges from the ladybug and cocoons. The ladybug may then even kick the virus and go on living after the young wasp departs.
Yeah, let me HIGH FIVE that long-hauler ladybug.
Just sayin’.
Democrats.
SPIT.
SO – where are we now?
Is Phony Gene Therapy About Population Control?
We have now looked at the COVER PRESENT (coronavirus and vaccines), the EFFECTIVE PRESENT (spike protein virus and vaccines), the LIKELY DEEPER MOTIVATING PRESENT (contraceptive / abortive virus and “vaccines” that look pretty much like public “health” gene therapy), and the PURPOSED ORIGINAL HONEST PAST (infection and/or genetic modification of the injected to produce desired effects using RNA viruses and/or specialized viral vectors) – the latter insect past being a lot like what is happening now.
Are you ready for the FUTURE?
Well, there’s a lot of range on that. Maybe it’s THIS…..
Now I know a lot of y’all are, like me, saying “Yeah, that will be a cold day in hell!” But let’s consider it anyway. It helps to understand things.
WHY would Hillary say this, about Trump’s possible winning in 2016?
What crime could POSSIBLY send hundreds of historic conspirators to some horrible fate like what happened to the NAZIS? They would have had to have done something even more horrible – right?
Well, viewed in “holocaust” (small “h”) terms, an “abortion virus” followed by “abortion vaccines” might count.
It’s a pretty ingenious idea. If you honestly believe that overpopulation threatens the planet, and that stopping it “by any means necessary” is justified, then the idea of:
taking a modifiable cold virus but…..
don’t call it that, so people will be AFRAID
warm up the FEAR CROWD with SARS, Ebola, Zika, etc.
use a cold with its own moderate antiprogestogenic or oxytocin hormonal activity, or some other way of exerting a contraceptive or abortive activity
optionally increase that activity
release the virus
create vaccines with the same effect
require ongoing vaccines to titrate the effect on society
To me, this is very much like the wasp strategy, only instead of hijacking the juvenile butterfly with immunosuppressive negative gene therapy in a PRO-FERTILITY strategy for its own offspring, what the Democrats are doing is an ANTI-FERTILITY strategy using progestosuppressive negative gene therapy on basically all humans who are not in on the scam. And they also used an RNA virus to mess with our minds, though THAT was a bit artful, shall we say.
Now, I think the success or failure of their operation is going to depend on the ultimate level of contraception that is achieved here. The effect on society will depend on whether the Dems, globalists, and Chinese are trying to pull off a very steep and fast population drop that would generate a social immune reaction, or a long, slow, incremental one that would not. We probably won’t know this for several years.
But just consider this “back of the envelope” calculation.
Let’s say that Demmunists require 2 coronavirus boosters every year. Say that between compliance and effectiveness, ONE of those boosters is effectively pregnancy-blocking for any pregnancy currently in process. Run this over all of humanity, so that once every year, every woman is hit with a “menstruation and miscarriage vaccine” using the spike protein. With a pregnancy window of 75% of the year, that target is the broad side of a barn, as long as CDC continues to insist that it’s safe for pregnant women, or women who are trying to become pregnant. You would get massive observable menstruation and miscarriages after vaccination, and the plot would not last.
It’s not a SUSTAINABLE LIE.
BUT – as long as the effect is random, subtle, and single-digits, it can be hidden by a compliant scientific community, which is socially conditioned to reject the truth. Even bigger, control of social media, communications, and other avenues of discovering the truth, mean society can be kept completely blind to a subtle population control.
But seriously – reducing the fertility of humans by 5% is a BIG DEAL. It doesn’t mean it’s the end of it. It’s a GOOD BEGINNING – from their point of view.
You’ve got to look at this thing, like you’re trying to pull it off, to see that you really COULD pull it off.
And if we could pull it off, they will pull it off.
So – that’s where I’m at.
And if I’m right, they will NEVER FACE JUSTICE for what they’re doing.
So here is a rule about Democrats.
Democrats, China and other communists will always pick an unjust fait accompli over a just agreement.
Thus, as long as they do things where the price of tolerating their crimes is less than the cost of a civil war, they will just keep doing those things.
The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that degrades animal tissues, and is responsible for the very distinctive giant-pock-mark-wound-forming symptoms of recluse bites. The brown recluse does not have as much of this protein in its venom as do some other recluses. The worst recluse, distributed over several countries in South America, has roughly ten times as much sphingomyelinase D as the North American brown recluse. Bites by THAT recluse not only result in deep wounds – they result in SYSTEMIC effects much more often than do bites of the “mere” brown recluse. Fatalities are much more common.
But just stop and think – THAT is how potent protein venoms can be. The tiny bite of a spider with a tiny bit of a protein in it – mere micrograms – can leave a 10-inch hole in the leg, with life-threatening systemic effects.
Snake venoms use different proteins from spiders in their venoms. Some spiders like the black widow have neurotoxic venoms, which affect nervous function, and some snakes like cobras have DIFFERENT neurotoxic venoms.
The honey badger is, weirdly, somewhat immune to the paralyzing neurotoxic cobra venom (jump to near the end of the video).
Many snakes have hemotoxic venoms, and THOSE venoms tend to cause cardiovascular problems. Interestingly, one of those problems is a somewhat rare clotting disorder called thrombocytopenia.
Thus, when I heard that this uncommon symptom was sometimes occurring as a coronavirus vaccine adverse effect, I suspected that there might be a protein cause – the spike protein – acting similarly to proteins in those hemotoxic snake venoms.
If that were the case, we should expect the same effect to be caused by COVID-19 itself, sometimes.
Should we just jump on such an analogy? One that is based on the ASSUMPTION that the spike protein is causing thrombocytopenia? Or at least similarly involved in the two cases?
Let’s think about this.
One of the things which is most fascinating about the BRANCH COVIDIANS – including the high clergy in government and media – is just how STRONGLY they tend to discourage alternative perspectives on COVID-19 – doing so in a way which is alarming even by the normal standards of narrative-setting and enforcement.
For example, at the very beginning, social media gatekeepers were needlessly hostile to Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell’s “high-altitude sickness” perspective on COVID-19 hypoxia, despite the fact that this led to a very beneficial new policy on keeping patients OFF vents, probably saving millions of lives, as well as giving us all a better understanding of HOW COVID-19 is and (more importantly) is NOT damaging lungs of patients.
Millions of lives. Think about it. Not a bad save – unless you want a guy named Trump GONE by any means necessary.
Now, some of these “different” perspectives can and do lead to non-working or just plain wrong theories at a micro-level, but so can ANY perspective. Dr. Kyle-Sidell’s ideas led to a variety of hemoglobin-related and malaria-related theories of COVID-19 which were neither fundamentally true nor useful, and which theories died on their own, without any need for censorship, but which were part of a questioning movement which also led to increased recognition of the endothelial nature of the coronavirus attack on patients’ lungs and other organs.
A CHANGE in perspective which WAS and IS fruitful.
Whether we are talking about damage to capillaries in the lungs, vein occlusions in the retina, or organ damage, particularly in the heart or kidneys, it appears that the cardiovascular endothelium is where COVID-19 does the most damage.
Comorbidities which already involve damage or potential damage to blood vessels – particularly diabetes and endocrine or cardiovascular diseases – are thus particularly dangerous, as SARS-CoV-2 and (presumably) its spike protein – which is what attacks cells – would be attacking an already weak point of failure.
I want to thank GrandmaInTexas for those two most recent examples of COVID vaccinations precipitating fatal outcomes in people with both diagnosed and undiagnosed comorbidities. For the record, Dan Kaminsky’s vaccine was undoubtedly either Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson+Johnson, while Actor Vivekh’s vaccine was Covaxin. The former 3 are all genetic vaccines – the latter is inactivated whole virus. All of them use the WHOLE spike protein in some form or another to trigger immunity.
Here is a handy principle which I call “spike protein equivalence”, as a special case of “vaccine immunological equivalence”.
If some affliction, condition, or mere FACTOR happens to be BAD for a potential victim of COVID-19 itself, then it’s also going to be bad for recipients of the vaccine. The difference is only that – most likely – in MOST cases – the vaccine constitutes a far lighter assault on the patient, than the disease itself.
THAT is the basic logic of vaccination. REDUCE THE RISK. But nonetheless, ACCEPT A RISK.
Do not kid yourself. The WHOLE POINT of vaccines is to entertain a lesser risk – a risk that is not as bad as the disease. The only question is “how less bad” does any particular vaccine happen to be. Based upon that information, one has INFORMED CONSENT.
People need to understand risks clearly in order to take those risks smartly.
Or NOT take them. Where the lyric“If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice” operates against the circling helicopters of COVID-19 and any successor viruses.
When we do not honestly face the risks and benefits of vaccines, we end up with the psychotic disconnect we now see, where people who SHOULD be voices of reason and trust – like the CDC – are LYING and losing half or more of the nation as trusting followers.
Rather than re-hash here how the CDC has lied to us already, or why the handy principles of “spike protein equivalence” and “snake protein analogy” work so well in understanding COVID disease and vaccine risks, let me give you links to my most recent discussions of the relevant thought.
The FIRST ONE is probably the most comprehensive, and helps to understand the rest.
PREFACE I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT. The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – …
Alternate Title: Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective? Gloating Pre-Preface There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought. Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY …
Every coronavirus vaccine so far has shown us SOME defect upon mass release, which was NOT evident in EVEN phase III clinical trials. Look HERE for a searchable PDF document of adverse effects from the Pfizer vaccine: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/977005/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf Check out these videos on the low-platelet clotting problem from the Oxford/Astrazeneca vaccine. Here is a fantastic …
I saw an excellent explanation of the clotting problem with the AstraZeneca vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 here: The doctor, Dr. ZDogg, MD, offers an exceptionally clear explanation of both what is going on with the AstraZeneca vaccine, and why its distribution was halted or limited in some places for some age groups of patients. …
I am not the only person who is seeing that the SPIKE PROTEIN and variants are interesting beasts. Cthulhu tipped me off to THESE TWO GEMS by Karl Denninger, which are extraordinarily worthwhile:
Even though these deal primarily with spike protein equivalence rather than the snake protein analogy, the latter of which Cthulhu mentioned in his tip (he knew I would like these), there is some even more shocking perspective in the second link, in which Denninger simply asks – why did we use the WHOLE sequence of the spike protein which we received from China?
Beyond simple blame games, in which I could postulate that “whole spike protein vaccines” may have resulted from dumb psychology, or even malicious treachery by one or more parties, I can ALSO place Denninger’s question in the context of both failing to ask “Stoecker questions” about “should we base vaccines on the WHOLE spike protein?”, AND the idea that – intentionally or unintentionally – by whoever – we essentially fell into China’s version of the plot of Species…..
OR – if we don’t want to be all negative about things, try the Earth-saving genetic sequence reconstruction sub-plot of The Fifth Element, with a few more plot devices about process-skipping on the internal growth code, also a bit of a lesson.
Is such “gain of function” good or bad? One could view horsepox-based smallpox vaccine adoption as “gain of function” – a low-level example of the intelligent acceleration of evolution as a “natural” part of evolution itself.
As an aside, IMO the reason they use women for these scenes is ultimately the same reason the spike protein seems to target women’s physiology more than men’s, and that men are actually the first utilitarian sex robots, but – well – it’s so simple, it’s complicated. Patriarchy is both overrated and overstated, shall we just say.
ANYWAY, back to snakebite. “Cleopatra meets spike protein” – only worse.
VAERS reports a breastfeeding five-month old infant has died of TTP – a rare clotting disorder linked to, yes, low platelets. He became ill one day after his mother received her second @pfizer shot.
I actually saved that whole report, which is not easily linked, as a series of images:
Before I go on, let me just say that immunology strikes me as a lot like quantum mechanics. If anybody says they truly understand it, it’s almost a sign that they don’t. Nevertheless, basic suspicions work like crazy in either field, which is, again, interesting. In either field, it doesn’t take a genius to see that – 99% of the time – a snake in the grass IS a snake in the grass.
Already, the entire Snopesian Empire is fired up over this case.
SEEK anything related, and you will FIND – both WHEAT and CHAFF.
READ, and you will FIND – both INTERESTING and HOLLOW.
No matter how many guns they get working and belt-fed, cross-firing with their diversionary strawman arguments on this one case, the fact of the matter is that TTP is intimately linked to immune disorders, immune responses, and vaccination, so if it shows up, vaccines are and will remain the likeliest suspect NO MATTER WHAT. All Fauci’s horses and all Pfizer’s men are not going to get rid of the NOTABLY MANY cases of TTP , other thrombocytopenic clotting disorders, and clotting disorders in general, which are showing up in (1) COVID cases, (2) COVID recoverees, (3) vaccination adverse events, and (4) vaccination of recoverees in particular.
The relationship of TTP to vaccines and “malappropriate antibodies” in particular is UNDERSTOOD SCIENCE. This is not going away, despite the near-dogmatic narrative that “COVID vaccines do no harm” at the public level, reinforced by the narrative that “fighting vaccine hesitancy is worth LYING about adverse effects”.
No, it’s not.
Skip the following scientific review unless you feel nerdy. I recommend just skimming in either case. But I promise – the deeper you dig here, the more WHEAT you will find.
TTP as a function of age of onset and mechanism for ADAMTS13 deficiency. The proportions of adulthood-/childhood-onset TTP and acquired/inherited TTP, respectively, presented in this figure were calculated from the data of the French Registry for TTP (840 patients).10,13 These data are in agreement with miscellaneous demographic data reported in the literature by other teams.3,5-9 The diagram shows 100 patients with TTP, each patient being represented by a symbol, either a square for patients with adulthood-onset TTP (91%) or a circle for patients with childhood-onset TTP (9%). Acquired TTP is presented in blue (94.5%), and inherited TTP (USS) in red (5.5%). Interestingly, the proportion of USS is very low (2.5%) in adulthood-onset TTP, whereas it is as high as 33% in childhood-onset USS.
Abstract
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare and life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, severe thrombocytopenia, and organ ischemia linked to disseminated microvascular platelet rich-thrombi. TTP is specifically related to a severe deficiency in ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 repeats, member 13), the specific von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease. ADAMTS13 deficiency is most frequently acquired via ADAMTS13 autoantibodies, but rarely, it is inherited via mutations of the ADAMTS13 gene. The first acute episode of TTP usually occurs during adulthood, with a predominant anti-ADAMTS13 autoimmune etiology. In rare cases, however, TTP begins as soon as childhood, with frequent inherited forms. TTP is ∼2-fold more frequent in women, and its outcome is characterized by a relapsing tendency. Rapid recognition of TTP is crucial to initiate appropriate treatment. The first-line therapy for acute TTP is based on daily therapeutic plasma exchange supplying deficient ADAMTS13, with or without steroids. Additional immune modulators targeting ADAMTS13 autoantibodies are mainly based on steroids and the humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. In refractory or unresponsive TTP, more intensive therapies including twice-daily plasma exchange; pulses of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, or cyclosporine A; or salvage splenectomy are considered. New drugs including N-acetylcysteine, bortezomib, recombinant ADAMTS13, and caplacizumab show promise in the management of TTP. Also, long-term follow-up of patients with TTP is crucial to identify the occurrence of other autoimmune diseases, to control relapses, and to evaluate psychophysical sequelae. Further development of both patients’ registries worldwide and innovative drugs is still needed to improve TTP management.
So what does TTP look like?
See those pictures? You may want to THINK TWICE about the coronavirus vaccine if you ALREADY have this risky potential outcome of either the disease or the vaccine. I have a link showing that TTP is a high risk in COVID recoverees who get any of the vaccines – I just can’t find it now.
We ARE seeing some public recognition of adverse effects now:
However, as is visible in this article, we are not seeing ANY contraindications to vaccination being admitted publicly. The advice tends to be “get vaccinated, and if you don’t die, but have bad symptoms, see your doctor.
“Sure, Dr. Stalin. Sure. Say – you don’t have any recommendations to PREVENT THIS from happening again to somebody else now, do you? Those would be called ‘contraindications’. Most drugs have them.”
However, I think some recognition is coming. And why is that? Well…..
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …
…..we discussed other disorders – affecting reproductive health, you might say – that MAY or MAY NOT be mediated through the SAME or DIFFERENT activities of the spike protein.
THAT is an interesting question, actually. How economic is spike protein activity? How MUCH strategic information is carried, and at what density? How efficient ARE proteins at carrying smaller-molecular strategies into “genetic warfare”? We may not have those answers yet – and certainly not in PUBLIC SCIENCE – for some time.
Still, I think these questions will eventually be asked and answered, because the menstrual/gestational and clotting effects of the vaccines are so startling, that people are going to ask questions and get answers, whether the “mainstream” (meaning government/corporate) media wants to ask them or not, or to see them answered.
In that regard, we will carry on, asking questions and getting answers, carrying the principle of SPIKE PROTEIN EQUIVALENCE with us, as a handy and useful physiological tool.
The idea of SNAKE PROTEIN ANALOGY will become less of a medical utility, and more of a METAPHOR.
There is a refreshing honesty and innocence in this guy’s work. But more than that, he just has a way of catching small details that everybody else misses, and making them beautifully prominent. His portraits of famous figures are quite wonderful in this way. He will completely drop many of the features of those people that I love and see prominently as part of my personal recognition algos, and yet childishly play up awesome things I never noticed.
And with that, let’s talk about Eve.
Our next installment is going to go BACK IN TIME, and show you something very startling about WHEN all this COVID vaccine technology was actually invented.
A lot earlier than anybody wants to admit publicly. Here is a hint.
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon
When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to one of the coronavirus vaccines, I never considered for a moment – AT THAT TIME – that it might have been an INTENDED outcome by anybody. It was only slowly, later, that such a possibility began to sink in.
We tend to view pregnancy as a somewhat “iffy” condition, and vaccination as one of the infinite “iffy” things which could derail it. We tend to view outcomes, other than the really obvious, as “acts of God” – if not at the level of the instance, then at the level of fortune – such as family genetics. “Something is wrong” – but it’s never anybody’s fault.
Well, what if one could change “fortune”?
I was NOT surprised that a virtue-signaling doctor might take a coronavirus vaccine while pregnant. I WAS surprised that there was NO medical advice contrary to pregnant women getting the vaccine – that pregnancy was NOT a contraindication. Pregnant women are a SMALL subset of the population, centered age-wise on the sweet spot of coronavirus survivability. Why take a chance?
Nope – not a whisper of it, even in the aftermath of the lady doctor’s misfortune. Indeed, only on the DARK CONSPIRACY WEB was there even a hint that maybe the good lady doctor should have done something other than happily getting the vaccine.
That was the state of things for me, until there were reports of clotting problems with AstraZeneca, affecting mostly women.
Then, there were the clotting problems of the Johnson+Johnson vaccine, AGAIN affecting almost exclusively women.
Singingsoul asked about the possibility of any relationship to “the pill”. That REALLY got me thinking about the seeming sex linkage to clotting. However, I made no connection back to miscarriages or stillbirths.
That connection did not happen for me, until there were reports of “menstruation upon vaccination”. THAT sure sounded like a “day after pill” to this longtime observer of Big Pharma. THAT would explain a miscarriage or a stillbirth AND the sudden induction of menstruation.
THE SPIKE PROTEIN. An abortifacient? Even if only a “five-percenter”?
It suddenly made me wonder.
I mean, if we were actually dealing with…..
RU-486 The Vaccine, that meant we were probably dealing with…..
No – not THAT structure – THIS one. Or THESE two. Both of them SWARMING with possibilities.
Now THAT is something. Something which could be PROVEN in a lab.
Probably not a lab that would get any modern funding, unless the author was KNOWN to submit scientific truth to globalist narrative, but still…. SOME “errant” lab might “accidentally” prove it to MY satisfaction. And that’s all the science *I* need to keep moving “forward”, past globalist control of science.
Interesting possibility. No?
You can bet your LIFE that the Democrats ARE afraid of any correlation here, and WILL distract like crazy from even the possibility of such a correlation being contemplated by the public.
And there is a LOT of circumstantial suspicion here.
It still remains unclear which hands moved which chess pieces where, in terms of release of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but HOWEVER things happened, it certainly appears that a virus, which VERY LIKELY negatively affects human reproduction and coincidentally “gets rid of Trump presidencies“, conveniently escaped a Chinese lab, in an event that helped – IN MANY WAYS – the principal advocates if not worshipers of free and easy human abortion: Democrats, globalists, and Chinese communists.
How amazing is THAT?
The party of abortion, the movement of abortion, and the nation of abortion, may have just gotten a “statistically effective but plausibly deniable abortion cold” which – if you don’t change the abortion protein too much – or more specifically in the wrong directions – gives one an abortion vaccine having the same wonderful properties of denied responsibility – plus the properties of continuous excuse and adjustable frequency of administration, only needing MORE of what the CDC is very good at providing.
LIES.
In my opinion, these three human control stakeholders are going to do EVERYTHING possible to not merely shut down any consideration of their possible treachery – they will desperately reframe Fake Science to turn such a pharmacological desideratum into either a null, or an irremovable side effect. That is, if they can’t make PERCEPTION of the entire problem simply go away.
BUT LET’S BACK UP.
My normal skepticism of every new assertion of female lunar pheromonal menstrual mystery is not because I don’t believe that some new, unexplained mense magic is POSSIBLE, but simply because the first step of science is to look for any obvious explanations of new magic using old theories.
However, one does not have to reach very deep into “old theory” to figure out that “I got a shot and my uterus dumped” is eminently explainable as a simple pharmacological effect. If more than one woman says this, it’s very UNLIKELY to be due to mass mommy hysteria, and much more likely that the inner scientist in a whole bunch of women just raised her hands in class.
And when it finally gets stated publicly by the “generally respected class radical”, watch out.
Repinning this warning from last night, when I was called a "conspiracy theorist"'for warning that COVID vaccines are causing blood clotting, stillbirths and bizarre menses in women. Today FDA halt J and J vaccine for blood clots. https://t.co/4JilJxxKZU
— Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. (@naomirwolf) April 13, 2021
Let’s do that as an IMAGE which Twitter can’t delete and hide.
Now I would be remiss if I didn’t point out that the J+J recall, connected to VIPIT and/or TTP, is not clearly pharmacologically DIRECTLY connected to the observed menstrual symptoms in women, which are (IMO) more properly described as antiprogestogenic or abortive in nature. Yes, dysfunctional clotting is an issue with women taking a more mildly antiprogestational regimen of hormonal control known as the pill – an important clue that Singingsoul put me onto very early. So YES – “blood issues” tag along with the hormonal aspects of menstruation and gestation for all kinds of good and obvious reasons in menstruating mammals.
So if things just stopped there – at a protein with apparently striking but somewhat randomly effective antiprogestogenic activity, it would be all I would need to wrap this 5%-er conspiracy up TIGHT. It would – IMO – demonstrate some kind of intent, by somebody, somewhere, to force humanity into a more contraceptive future. It’s an elegant checkmate move, IMO, due to the DISEASE which is almost certainly hard to eliminate.
Very nicely, there is nothing WEIRD, MAGICAL, or SPOOKY about a highly potent antiprogestogenic protein, released first as a virus, and then as a vaccine, by a technocratic, power-holding oligarchy, which believes fervently in the social, societal, and civilizational effects of that protein.
It’s kinda weird that such medical cunning got into a virus, with our level of public scientific ability, but I can come up with several excellent theories as to how that happened – with varying degrees of believability, depending upon which particular secrets you believe the Deep State holds.
The trouble is, we have OTHER alleged evidence that we are now being asked to believe – that “people close to people being vaccinated” – BUT NOT ACTUALLY VACCINATED – are somehow, sometimes, showing symptoms. Setting aside the possibility of at least partial disinformation, including intentional discreditation and obfuscation (very likely in any case), this stuff borders on mense magic.
However – HOLD MY BEER at the Friday night lab outing to the bar. I’ve got a theory (hic).
Some of this stuff is also explicable by other potential scientific aspects of a putative antiprogestogenic or otherwise abortive spike protein – things which may indeed be credible science.
In fact, the “more bizarre stuff” could help to explain the “less bizarre stuff”, because it argues for a contraceptive potency which is more likely to be found in a prostaglandin analog like misoprostol, or a peptide hormone (you know, a small protein) like oxytocin, than in an antiprogestogen like mifepristone or lilopristone.
This gets into how RU-486 is administered, and how it actually works. It turns out that RU-486 is in fact the “less important actor” of the day-after pill.
I repeat. I want you to understand. RU-486 was a kind of beautiful social and scientific DECOY, DISTRACTION, and MISDIRECTION.
The primary abortifacient drug in the “day-after pill” is not actually mifepristone, a.k.a. RU-486, but the co-drug misoprostol.
This would not be the first time that Democrats DISTRACTED and MISDIRECTED to the lesser of two scandals so that the more murderous one would get off. Thus – IMO – RU-486 took Cuomo-kissing levels of media heat precisely so that the abortion-meister misoprostol would SKATE like a nursing home scandal with thousands of dead people.
Dosing of misoprostol for abortion – with or without anything else – is typically below 1 mg as a single dose, absorbed through the oral mucosa. Note that route of entry. That is a HUGE potency. One milligram is hardly anything at all. The fact that 1 mg of ANY substance will cause an abortion is, quite frankly, startling news.
Addition of RU-486 (200 mg) to the regimen of misoprostol (800 μg = 0.8 mg) alone RAISES the success of abortion from about 88% to near total, so if the spike protein is primarily showing a prostaglandin / oxytocin activity, then the spike protein could have almost any level of antiprogestogenic activity and still be a wickedly good abortifacient / contraceptive.
And speaking of that OLDER alternative to misoprostol, namely oxytocin – well, THAT particular uterine-contracting, labor-inducing substance is a peptide, i.e. a protein fragment. Which certainly argues that the idea of a spike protein having oxytoxin-like activity isn’t complete science fiction.
Note that oxytocin is only 9 amino acids long. Easy to hide in a longer sequence. And possibly as a DIFFERENT small sequence, because of protein 3-D dynamics.
·Cys – Tyr – Ile – Gln – Asn – Cys – Pro – Leu – Gly – NH2
Alternatively…..
CYIQNCPLG-NH2
SO – let’s state this for the record. If the spike protein or some fragment thereof has some kind of oxytocin activity, then we pretty much have our bad guy. The potency of oxytocin is even greater than that of misoprostol. One international unit (IU) of oxytocin is the equivalent of 1.68 μg of pure peptide. That is less than two MICROGRAMS per unit. The dose for adult abortion is roughly 10 to 30 IU, which translates to 16.8 to 50.4 micrograms. A very small fraction of a single milligram.
This is – bluntly – more potent than LSD.
Thus, it is entirely possible that if the spike protein or fragments spat back out from genetic incorporation of its instructions, somehow have oxytoxin activity, then that protein / peptide could act as a kind of contraceptive / abortifacient.
Are you with me?
OK – armed with THAT knowledge, listen to the following amazing discussion. Don’t pay attention so much to their hyperbole about “biological warfare”, or charming innocent errors about [this is a logical paraphrase] “digital lipid nanotechnology” – the stuff that makes it possible to call these people “conspiracy theorists” despite what I think are fairly impressive backgrounds on some of them. Pay attention to factual observations and reports, and ask if they are plausible when dealing with an extremely potent hormonal substance, where the amount needed to obtain strong biological effects is not only capable of being produced by the human body – the amount of substance needed to achieve the effect in self or other is BARELY EVEN VISIBLE.
So what do you think? I’ll let you decide for yourselves.
I don’t believe in unexplainable magic – I believe in science. But SCIENCE can explain stuff that does almost seem magical. And I think it could very well explain what people are observing here.
Thus, I believe that we may indeed be seeing some kind of real antiprogestogenic, prostaglandin, and/or oxytocin effect from the spike protein or a subunit thereof.
A “contraceptive” effect, basically. And most likely small enough to escape obvious notice, but BIG enough that when everybody is forced to take the vaccine, even during pregnancy, it “does its thing” and gives the depopulationist socialists a 5% solution.
It may not appear always, or always strongly enough to show up in every person, but it only has to show up in a FRACTION of people getting the disease, or taking the vaccine, to significantly change the world.
Indeed, if the effect is TOO STRONG, one cannot “get away with it”. But if the “worshipers of sacred abortion” just nickel and dime us, they can get a GOOD START on depopulation.
Give them nothing but one more day to rue, and the wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Remain CIVIL and possibly even GENTEEL.
Today, in our VERY SPECIAL Wolf’s Mole Day issue, we have FIVE SHORT LESSONS in politically incorrect WOLFTHINK.
What is a Mole?
Before we ask What is “Mole Day?”, let’s ask: What is a “mole”?
Think of the idea “a pair” (2) of shoes, or “a dozen” (12) eggs. Increase a dozen by 1 to 13 (“a baker’s dozen”) of bagels or doughnuts. Increase to 144 for “a gross” of bottle rockets to celebrate the 4th of July.
You will see that named numbers useful for MEASURING QUANTITIES OF THINGS are “a thing”. They are “convenient numbers”. Now, while dozens, baker’s dozens, and grosses of those things aren’t really all that tied to physical realities, PAIRS of things are strongly related to biology – the fact that so many living organisms have BILATERAL symmetry, so “things” appear in pairs, and thus “pairs” become a thing – a useful thing to talk about.
Still with me? Yeah, it’s fluffy. Just go along and you will enjoy the fluffiness and tastiness, and maybe even some “empty calories”, of the mental cotton candy.
Now a DOZEN is actually a useful number (12) because it is so DIVISIBLE by common lower numbers, i.e. by 2, 3, 4 and 6. So UTILITY doesn’t have to be just physically rooted – it can be rooted in mathematics, finance, money, and/or stuff like that.
A MOLE is like a scientifically useful version of the dozen or pair. A mole is the number of atoms of carbon-12 that weighs exactly 12 grams. Once that number was decided, the number was fixed.
The number is 6.02214076 × 1023
This number is also called Avogadro’s number, the Avogadro number, the Avogadro constant, etc.
Now that seems very simple, but one is bound to ask the question “12 and 12 – WHY?”, and that is a great question, but before we answer it, I want to clarify some things about the basic relationship – the definition – that will make you go “AHA!”
First, we repeat:
A mole is the number of atoms of carbon-12 that weighs exactly 12 grams.
Here is what that necessarily implies, mathematically:
if a GRAM ITSELF were different, a MOLE would be a proportionately different number
if the NUMBER OF GRAMS of carbon we chose were different from 12, then a MOLE would be a fractionally or multiply different number
if we chose a DIFFERENT element / isotope and used its matching number (say, 235 grams of uranium 235, a MOLE would be a SLIGHTLY different number, because of nuclear binding energy differences
All of that should help you see this basic point – the NUMBER of grams was PICKED so that “a mole of something” would make the number of grams match its atomic weight, roughly, and centered most strongly on carbon 12, the most common isotope of carbon.
A MOLE is a convenience number for roughing it. Thus, 12 grams (1 mole) of carbon (mostly isotope 12) and 32 grams (2 moles) of oxygen (mostly isotope 16) will react to give 44 grams (1 mole) of carbon dioxide, which has a “molar mass”, and a “molecular mass”, of roughly 44.
A mole (6.02214076 × 1023) makes the number of moles come out conveniently, just like a pair makes the number of legs, arms, eyes, and weapons-grade ta-tas come out conveniently.
We will forever thank WHEATIETOO for the hilarious term “WGTT”!
FOUR could be a “pair” for cows, and then cows would have a pair of legs and a pair of udders, but even for cows (no pun intended), you can see that having a pair be TWO is more convenient, because there are fewer instances of “fractional pairs”, as eyes, horns, and snorting nostrils would have to be.
SO – a “mole” of something is a LOGICAL NUMBER. And “Mole Day” was an educator’s fun way to celebrate this LOGICAL THINKING.
For more information, and a more professional explanation, try HERE:
What Mole Day is NOT, is any kind of celebration of STINKY DIAPER and other such refuse that sneaks into positions of power, influence and especially SPY AGENCIES and then undermines them.
YUCK!
No, we’re going to talk about the celebration of LOVABLE, HUGGABLE MOLES!
Wikipedia actually has a good description of what “Mole Day” is.
Mole Day
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mole Day is an unofficial holiday celebrated among chemists, chemistry students and chemistry enthusiasts on October 23, between 6:02 a.m. and 6:02 p.m.,[1][2] making the date 6:02 10/23 in the American style of writing dates. The time and date are derived from the Avogadro number, which is approximately 6.02×1023, defining the number of particles (atoms or molecules) in one mole (mol) of substance, one of the seven base SI units.
Overview
Mole Day originated in an article in The Science Teacher in the early 1980s.[3] Inspired by this article, Maurice Oehler, now a retired high schoolchemistry teacher from Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin, founded the National Mole Day Foundation (NMDF) on May 15, 1991.[3]
Many high schools around the United States, South Africa, Australia, and Canada celebrate Mole Day as a way to get their students interested in chemistry, with various activities often related to chemistry or moles.[3]
The American Chemical Society sponsors National Chemistry Week,[1] which occurs from the Sunday through Saturday during which October 23 falls. This makes Mole Day an integral part of National Chemistry Week.
So there you have it.
Today is MOLE DAY, celebrating the number 6.02×1023 at 6:02 AM to PM on October 23rd.
It’s that simple.
In Praise of Fellow Critter Mole
Normally, Wolf finds Mole to be either PESKY or TASTY, depending upon his mood. However, on Mole Day, Wolf recalls fondly his youthful admiration for Mole, before an asteroid called FAKE SCIENCE struck the giant Turtle upon which humanity lives.
Shortly after Fake Science struck, The Wicked Witch of The West, Nanzi Pelosi, with her Flying Monkeys of Global Warming, took Professor Molenium hostage, and promised to burn up all of Kalifornistan with wildfires, if the leaders of all the scientific organizations didn’t implement Critical Race Theory and Settled Science.
So here we are.
On Mole Day, Wolf remembers when science actually WAS real, and not decided by treasonous media and “white guilt”, another fine product of CCP brainwashing. He remembers when nobody cared whether Mole was White Hispanic Mole, Black White Supremacist Mole, or A Really Large Number (6.02×1023).
Ah, those were the days.
Mole was a Fun Guy back then – totally devoid of color.
Wolf will try to remember him that way. Or her. Whatever.
Vaccines, Nanotechnology & Reality
Wolf got a hot tip from his friend Mole, that Molenium Magazine, a.k.a. Chemical & Engineering News, had a great article about COVID-19 vaccines, which Mole knew that Wolf was interested in. Oh, boy, you can say that again. As soon as Wolf read the article, he understood not only why “Trump vaccines” are going to work, and why the ChiComs stole that Harvard Nanotechnology guy for their Thousand Talents of Silver program – he ALSO understood why the #WuMao on Twitter and elsewhere are pushing extremely bogus ideas about nanotechnology and vaccines on Trump’s base, to dumb us down and try to defeat Trump.
NOPE. Wolf has to do something about NASTY NANZI and her NASTY CHICOMS. Or maybe it’s Nasty ChiComs and THEIR Nasty Nanzi. Either way.
AGAIN.
Allow me to explain.
The ideas that you need to understand why TRUMP VACCINES WORK are very simple, but they expose a lot of DECEPTION, and that part is COMPLICATED.
First, viruses ARE nanomachines. Viruses ARE little robots. They were designed by nature, which was designed by God.
If you used REAL nanotechnology (called chemistry, biochemistry, and molecular biology) to make a little DRONE VIRUS that looks like one but doesn’t actually infect you, you’re not even making a working robot. It’s almost like a SCARECROW of a robot. It’s like a kid in a Halloween costume, and we’re figuring out how to make them actually scary to scare your immune system into BEING A PREPPER.
That is the level of technology the Chinese communists have made you FEAR, when their trolls get online and gin up CONCERN about NANOTECHNOLOGY AND VACCINES. The ChiComs ALMOST HINT that little robots are going to be released by these vaccines, and that they will turn you into a TRANSHUMAN of some kind.
SCARECROWS. That is the level of “robot” we’re talking about.
See how this works? We want antibodies to attack the SCARECROW VIRUS out on its tips of the spike proteins, so scientists figured out how to make it more like a porcupine shape, so they don’t have to put a bunch of aluminum and GARBAGE in poorly working vaccines, that Adam Schiff pretends are not a reality.
Note that such GOOD SCIENCE is the stuff that ChiNazi spies try to STEAL from our researchers. REAL science. GOOD science.
And then they try to make us believe BAD SCIENCE, or better yet, DISTRUST ALL SCIENCE.
Communism did this. COMMUNISM.
AND logic, people. Vaccines are sometimes BAD but they don’t have to be. Vaccines are often GOOD but they aren’t always so. SCIENCE IS REAL – but not like lying Democrats and deceiving socialists will tell you, because socialism has allegiance to itself and not THE TRUTH. Socialism says “believe Tedros and WHO” when both are proven LIARS and puppets of deceitful socialists like the CHINAZIS.
The W.H.O. can be WRONG, DECEIVED, or LYING. Susan Wocommie of YouTube pretends that’s not true.
LOGICAL THINKING. Accept the complication of multiple simple truths. It will help us BEAT THESE COMMIES.
Second, there ARE NO little metal or plastic nanobots that race out of vaccines to destroy you, for the exact same beautiful quantum mechanical reasons that Fantastic Voyage and Innerspace are both science fiction and not science.
No matter how many HOT WHITE MAGA LADY DOCTORS tell you things that are just a bit out of their league, those things are not always true – or at least, they’re not COMPLETELY TRUE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZH1Drpnjo
I recommend that you listen to this lady, as far as learning to be SKEPTICAL. Much of what she has to say is very true. Some of it is a bit wrong, or very distant and “hand-wavey”.
Listen to this lady on things like UNKNOWNS of new and untested DNA vaccines, including uncertainties about UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES, which are “NOT POSSIBLE” on paper, but could be realities, like GENETIC INCORPORATION. After all, why are our human genomes LITTERED with viral JUNK? Yeah. There’s that, too. How did THAT happen? Bear in mind that there ARE vaccines which DEPEND on genetic incorporation. Those vaccines use CRISPR-Cas9 technology to EDIT YOUR GENES in T cells.
None of the current TRUMP VACCINES use this KNOWING gene-modifying tech, as far as I know, and I sure would not want MY NAME on any future ones that are not VERY up-front about using CRISPR-Cas9 genetic modification technology or similar, and about the DANGERS of this technology.
Listen to this gal on UNTESTED NEW TECHNOLOGIES like mRNA, which even the Moderna mRNA vaccine scientists ADMIT in their published papers could have unintended consequences because they’ve never been tried on humans on a large scale, and are full of uncertainty. The subtle aroma of CYA just POURS from that part of the scientific papers. They wrote the disclaimers for the ages. Nobody wants to be remembered as Doctor Frankenstein.
Listen to her on DIGITAL TRACKING USING MICRONEEDLE ARRAY TECHNOLOGY, and SURREPTITIOUS CONTRACEPTION, STERILIZATION AND ABORTION. Yup. It’s ALL THERE.
On nanotechnology? Ehhhhhhh, NOT SO MUCH. She’s out of her league, in my opinion. This is where she waves her hands and relies on fear. Yes, TRANSHUMANISM is both a threat and an opportunity, long range. Yes, NANOTECH can and will be abused, no doubt. But not in these specific vaccines, IMO, as far as the active, openly sought, coronavirus vaccines, PER SE.
The nanotech being used NOW in the stated vaccines is actually just advanced biochemistry, bleeding into biology via biophysics. You will see below. It’s very simple, crude, early stuff. I will explain, very gently. And once you understand it, it’s simple, but WONDERFUL.
NOW – this is not to say that REAL quality scientific breakthroughs – like TRUMP VACCINES and TRUMP ANTIBODIES – could not possibly be used to hide LIES and DECEPTION – such as added STERILITY VACCINES and ABORTION ADDITIVES and HUMAN TRACKING NUMBERS (any dye-bearing micro-needle array vaccine will mark you uniquely), because – well – just listen to this lady above, and also below, with Mike Adams to help ferret out the truth.
Good vaccines are KNOWN to have been TAMPERED WITH to inflict ABORTION on unknowing recipients, mostly, apparently, black women in Africa. It’s UGLY and CRUEL and people need to be in PRISON for this stuff.
This is a VERY fascinating interview. What is revealed here is that ABORTION VACCINES are a THING. Not just sterilization vaccines. ABORTION vaccines.
There are GOOD PEOPLE in science, who pursue only TRUTH. They don’t have HIDDEN AGENDAS.
However, there are BAD PEOPLE who try to control science for hidden agendas. Like these.
They may FUND good science for COVER, such as coronavirus vaccine research, but their real interest is their HIDDEN AGENDA, such as surreptitious contraception, abortion, and depopulation. To say nothing of GETTING TRUMP OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE.
OK? It’s going to be COMPLICATED BUSINESS to ferret out the BAD GUYS and KEEP THEM OUT.
The “nanobots” and “nanotechnology” are always the SCARY PAYLOAD of #WuMao anti-vaccine propaganda to dumb you down. BEWARE. They won’t explain it, so you will just FEAR IT.
I’m explaining it, so that you will not only NOT fear it – you will DESPISE and NOT TRUST the Chinese communists who try to deceive you. And so you will not trust ANYBODY WHO HELPS THEM.
Third, the main nanobot action of the COVID-19 virus is for the spikes to CHANGE SHAPE to EXPOSE HIDDEN WEAPONS as well as to deploy DECOYS designed to fool BODILY DEFENSES.
This is INTELLIGENCE. This is SMART. It’s SNEAKY. Evolution was the INTELLIGENT PROCESS used by various viruses to LEARN TO HIDE THEIR WEAPONS from bodily defenses.
We have the explanation of the appearance of vaccine immune enhancement (i.e., a substantial fraction of “failing and dangerous vaccines”) RIGHT HERE. It’s beautiful, and it shows HOW and WHY viruses evolved defenses against the human immune system.
And if you are thinking “Wow, this kind of viral sneakery will only get worse because of the CCP ChiNazis”, then yes – you see the THREAT that the CCP poses, allying not with humanity and LIFE but with CHAOS, LIES and DARKNESS.
One of the most important points from Li-Meng Yan and her two papers is the level of DECEPTION built into the China Virus. The ChiNazis have learned to bury their sneakery under evolution. How cute. This is why HER testimony is so important to the world.
So are you ready to “read along with Wolf”?
Let’s begin.
Back to the start.
Let’s read the title. “The tiny tweak behind COVID-19 vaccines”. This is actually a big deal. Almost ALL of the “Trump vaccines” which are also “Bill Gates vaccines” IN THEORY (very important) are using this “tiny tweak” which FIXES THEM against vaccine immune enhancement.
[ Side Note: A Trump vaccine is a Trump vaccine until you add an ABORTIFACIENT to it, or a DIGITAL TRACKER to it, and then it becomes a Bill Gates vaccine. ]
Vaccine-induced immune enhancement is something that Gail Combs and I have harped on endlessly as a HUGE bugaboo in vaccines, and particularly in coronavirus vaccines. It is the PROBLEM which Communist Democrats REFUSE to admit exists, and – OMG – it was SOLVED for these vaccines.
I am POSITIVE that scientists have FOUND the basic problem and FIXED IT.
SOMEBODY will get a Nobel prize for this stuff. Not a “Noble Prize”. A real NOBEL.
Read the SUBTITLE to begin understanding the KEY MOVE.
Prepandemic coronavirus research by Jason McLellan and Barney Graham led to a trick for stabilizing the prefusion form of spike proteins
This seems like a “tiny tweak”, but it’s not. This “trick” is a major advance in FIXING VACCINES AS A WHOLE. Conceptually, it has opened the DOOR to making VACCINES as SMART as VIRUSES.
NOW do you understand why those ChiCom SPIES are trying to get this stuff?
And it is all NANOTECHNOLOGY. REAL nanotechnology. Not some scary Alinsky boogeyman nanotechnology.
So – let’s look at the problem, using the SAME VIRUS that Gail Combs has been telling us about – the one where the early vaccine KILLED KIDS.
Here is how the “spike-like” F surface protein of RSV CHANGES when it interacts with a cell.
The protein on the left is what it looks like BEFORE it attacks your cells. The one on the right is AFTER it attacks. The disappearing RED ZONE is the part that SHOULD GET flagged by antibodies.
Very ironic (or perhaps I should say VIRONIC) that the protein turns from what looks like a CLOSED KNIFE into what looks like a CLUB.
This is VERY, VERY similar to what happens to the spike proteins of COVID-19 virus:
What this means is that we should NOT be looking for and trying to stop THIS…..
…..because doing so will result in the useless biological law-enforcement cluster-pluck that we know as IMMUNE ENHANCEMENT – which is doing too much, too late.
Instead, we should be looking for and trying to stop THIS:
GET IT?
Going back to the “left-vs.-right” protein pictures above, we want antibodies that seek out and stop what is ON THE LEFT – not what is ON THE RIGHT.
The stuff on the RIGHT is EXPENDED protein. It’s USED BRASS. It’s FIRED BULLETS.
This was ALWAYS the problem with BOTHour bodily defenses AND failing vaccines. They were primarily keying on the WRONG THING. This is why DEAD VIRUS was a fail as a vaccine for so many viruses. The proteins “hair trigger” into their FIRED STATE and the resulting virons don’t work to train the body to spot LIVE VIRUS with UNFIRED PROTEINS.
So how do we get the proteins we need to TRAIN the body correctly?
CRISIS ACTORS!!!
Yes. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. The TRUTH is almost hilarious.
I’m not going to get into the SPECIFIC chemistry of what scientists did to create DUMMY RIGGED SPIKE PROTEINS for your body to take target practice on, but they basically used two approaches, in combination with BLANK ROUNDS.
First, the BLANK ROUNDS part.
The “blank rounds” are the fact that these new Trump vaccines are INCOMPLETE as viruses. There is no complete virus. No matter what principle is used, there is not enough information for a COMPLETE VIRUS. Trump vaccines cannot infect you, unlike “live virus” or faulty “attenuated / weakened” virus vaccines.
In the case of Novavax, you are getting DUMMY RIGGED SPIKE PROTEIN stuck in a FAKE VIRUS BALL, with no RNA to create more of it. This is ultimate scarecrow stuff. Pre-fab scarecrows.
In the case of the others, like Pfizer and Moderna, you are getting DUMMY RIGGED RNA which serves as instructions to make the DUMMY RIGGED SPIKE PROTEIN, but nothing else needed to build the complete virus. These vaccines create the equivalent of the Novavax vaccine “in vivo”.
YOUR body, near the injection site, MAKES the scarecrows.
SO, the main point. How did they create “dummy rigged spike protein” or its instructions? What *IS* the dummy rigged spike protein? Alternatively stated, “how did they make the scarecrow, or the design of the scarecrow?”
They basically used TWO techniques, to make a FAKE spike protein that is LIKE the real thing, but which can’t change shape and “open up”.
One technique was to substitute ANGLE IRONS for hinges.
The other technique was to substitute MOLECULAR VELCRO for smooth chrome plate at key points.
The combination of the two types of MUTATIONS (because that is what these would be in real life – BAD MUTATIONS) utterly SABOTAGES the spike protein. It turns it into a super dud. It cannot “open up” and attack cells. But it’s a DUD that looks exactly like the real McCoy, coming into the fight.
It’s CRISIS ACTORS with BLANKS.
Send ’em in, and let the immune system shoot ’em up for target practice. It’s RUTHLESS.
The first innovation these scientists tried used TWO of the angle iron substitutions – the amino acid PROLINE – and is thus called the “2P mutation“. That is being used in MOST of the Trump vaccines, but not all. The AstraZeneca vaccine (which ran into trouble, BTW) does not use it. It’s not fully certain that the 2P mutation works in ACTUAL VACCINES, but based on reports that the Pfizer vaccine could be approved in November, it is VERY likely that it does actually work “well enough”.
[ PS and hint – it’s always useful to look who casts doubt on key advances in science. Just sayin’. ]
Now, this research is not resting on its laurels – it is ALREADY moving on to better and better crisis actor proteins and / or instructions for the same. Stated more fully…..
WORK IS ALREADY WELL UNDERWAY ON SECOND-GENERATION TRUMP VACCINES.
How do you like THAT?!!!
Here is a new rigged spike protein called “HexaPro” (named after the SIX proline angle irons – the red/blue pentagonal units pointed out in the upper left magnification).
Here is a guide to the picture, for those who are interested in the how the FOUR TYPES OF RIGGING work.
Here is a LINK and a summary – basically the header information from the paper (it’s still HUGE).
The development of therapeutic antibodies and vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is focused on the spike (S) protein that decorates the viral surface. A version of the spike ectodomain that includes two proline substitutions (S-2P) and stabilizes the prefusion conformation has been used to determine high-resolution structures. However, even S-2P is unstable and difficult to produce in mammalian cells. Hsieh et al. characterized many individual and combined structure-guided substitutions and identified a variant, named HexaPro, that retains the prefusion conformation but shows higher expression than S-2P and can also withstand heating and freezing. This version of the protein is likely to be useful in the development of vaccines and diagnostics.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to accelerated efforts to develop therapeutics and vaccines. A key target of these efforts is the spike (S) protein, which is metastable and difficult to produce recombinantly. We characterized 100 structure-guided spike designs and identified 26 individual substitutions that increased protein yields and stability. Testing combinations of beneficial substitutions resulted in the identification of HexaPro, a variant with six beneficial proline substitutions exhibiting higher expression than its parental construct (by a factor of 10) as well as the ability to withstand heat stress, storage at room temperature, and three freeze-thaw cycles. A cryo–electron microscopy structure of HexaPro at a resolution of 3.2 angstroms confirmed that it retains the prefusion spike conformation. High-yield production of a stabilized prefusion spike protein will accelerate the development of vaccines and serological diagnostics for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Dig into THAT if you want to get very close to the state of the art.
Now – here is where WOLF is going to put in a good word for Molenium Magazine, a.k.a. Chemical & Engineering News. This is one HELL of an article. This kind of reporting, and this particular article, should be everywhere. If people knew this stuff, they would realize all kinds of GREAT things.
Not only GREAT THINGS about REALITY, but about the REALITY of great things IN AMERICA.
About GREAT THINGS happening in America.
About the TRUMP VACCINES.
About TRUMP.
And that is exactly why you are NOT hearing about this stuff – ANYWHERE.
Our FAKE NEWS is sitting on the TRUTH about the Trump vaccines precisely because they ARE the “Trump vaccines” – the vaccines that Trump, together with his advisers, pushed for.
And THAT leads me to my next topic. Exactly WHY we’re seeing the TRAVESTY of great science journalism and great science truth being IGNORED and MARGINALIZED in the mainstream.
How China Stole Logic From The West
When I worked in shallow state, I saw – literally, over many years – thousands of jobs shipped overseas, many to China. It was done in a very careful way. Nobody saw THEIR current job shipped to China. Nobody saw their close coworker’s job shipped to China. It was always done carefully, distantly, and invisibly. Sometimes there was a certain amount of “musical chairs” to make jobs come and go in a complicated way, to hide the sending of jobs, but away they went. The jobs that were sent to India were more open, because they were less controversial. But when numbers came out, the numbers indicated there had been a massive loss of “growth jobs” to China.
Jobs going to China were always more hush-hush than jobs going to India or elsewhere.
The thing is, China doesn’t just do this by simply gaining advantage for China. They also insist on hurting America at the same time. It’s HOW THEY ROLL. They don’t just beat America in the race. They make sure America runs a bad race, or is permanently harmed. THAT is China.
THAT is the CCP.
When mainland, PRC Chinese suddenly started working with us, here in the US, the Hong Kong Chinese and Taiwanese who had previously worked for us, began a delicate dance of “situational awareness” and self-protection. This produced a wealth of information, for those who had friends in those groups, who were willing to talk. Not all were forthcoming with information, but some information I got was simply astounding. This information made me watchful, and my vigilant state then PAID OFF BIG-TIME.
One important thing that I began to learn, once made aware of CCP actions in US companies, was how CCP assets in the United States would deniably sabotage US operations. Their work is subtle, and sometimes even hidden by a certain amount of self-deprecation, but it is extremely effective.
A CCP asset doesn’t have to crash a US company by themselves to begin what can become a massive compromise or even downfall. They only need to compromise a small bit of workflow around themselves – possibly while looking good themselves. All they have to do is remove the MARGIN – the EDGE – the BREAK-EVEN – the BLACK INK – of a low-margin but critical group, and they can create the case for outsourcing to China. Combine this with “global-minded” upper management and the inability of lower management to make allegations against skilled players who are ready to use leftist “protection” memes as defenses, and it becomes very difficult to defend keeping operations in the United States.
One example really stayed with me, of how they operate. The CCP asset was a young mainlander with “some computer security experience”, whose pretense of slight incompetence was simply too opportune and skilled to be real, but whose pretense of goofy honesty could disarm almost ANY American.
The way I caught him was almost accidental. There was a certain long-running, weekly, technical meeting which was always a struggle. In its past, it had achieved many useful things, typically resulting from a combination of policy resolutions and creation of enabling new technologies to facilitate the agreed resolutions. Good things had come from all of the members, except a few.
Sadly, this meeting had become notoriously ineffective and rarely produced any worthwhile progress for several years, despite leadership and membership which should have yielded great things. It got to the point where many of us simply joked about the meeting being a waste of time. Many felt that the meeting would likely go away, as it produced nothing.
At one meeting, where a surprisingly worthwhile solution was actually getting traction, I observed that this Chinese guy derailed the discussion by injecting an outdated concern, ironically an older problem mostly with some of the Chinese staff and non-Chinese management, who he was specifically targeting with this concern at the meeting. I was shocked at how effectively this torpedoed the progress of the group on the issue. My old conversations with non-PRC coworkers familiar with PRC tactics came rushing back to mind. This was NOT something they had told me about, but it resembled other tactics that I HAD been warned about.
Knowing what to watch for, I decided to spend less time interacting at this meeting, and more time observing the likely CCP asset. He had a remarkable way of heading off almost ANY productive discussion. It got to the point where I had to (not always successfully) suppress laughter every time he derailed the group. The group leaders, who included many managers and senior technical staff, were utterly oblivious to what he was doing, and sometimes he would even ham it up a bit, as if he was playing a trick on a small child and “having fun with it”.
With this experience, it was not hard for me, more recently, to believe that a CCP cell spread among California graduate students was undermining multiple American universities, by promoting American radicals, when their communications were exposed.
But it gets worse.
I am now convinced that socialist-trained scientists have been LITERALLY trained to “virtue-signal through science”, and thus follow MEDIA CUES on how to TIP their science for psychological rewards.
This is why the CCP always made sure that there was a party political officer in both military and technical units – not so much to apply the STICK of party discipline, but to make sure that the CARROTS which reward VIRTUE SIGNALS went to the right people for the “right work”.
This does not just work on the Chinese – it works on EVERYBODY.
I have mentioned before that I know a number of “East Bloc and Former Soviet Union” emigres, refugees, defectors and escapees. Though most will not describe themselves as socialists, and will even reject the label, they love Bernie Sanders, and support policies that are basically socialist.
THIS behavior fits PRECISELY with what a young Taiwanese friend told me years ago. This friend insisted that mainland socialism just CHANGED people – that it removed parts of their human morality – that it made them socialists, whether they admitted it or not. In the opinion of this friend, the DAMAGE could never be removed, if the person actually GREW UP under CCP socialism. CCP socialist training STAYED with a person.
This is, I believe, how the climate change scam worked. People don’t WANT to admit that they “virtue signal in their practice of science”, but they DO, and socialists KNOW IT. Just like a FIRE can be grown from a small bit of smoking grass into a FOREST FIRE, so a small, politically desired bit of politically useful science can be grown from small to large, first in the Petri dish of a small corner of niche science, then fanned larger and larger with media attention and publisher rewards. Having “comrades” in both the media and science publishing world helps.
It has been EXTREMELY easy to see this in the case of COVID-19, because not only is the COVID “scam” a bit of a rush job, but the CCP narratives have been very obvious.
First let me simply cite the entire hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) travesty, where CCP interference was run mostly through (1) the UN, WHO, and Tedros, (2) science journals which have huge exposures vis-a-vis China and Chinese publisher entanglements, and (3) the pharmaceutical industry, also highly compromised by Chinese involvements. Were it not for the discovery of the murderous LancetGate Effect, wherein people in Switzerland, France and America provably DIED when HCQ was withdrawn and then reinstated, it’s possible that China would have gotten away with undermining a drug THEY were using inside China. Bear in mind – there is evidence that HCQ usage has been both popular AND promoted inside China, at the same time that various FRONT-FACES for China have deniably undermined the drug OUTSIDE of China. That, of course, matches other CCP behaviors, like travel restrictions INSIDE China but not to the outside.
This is simply a PATTERN with the CCP. Get used to it.
My biggest catch here was arguably that FIRST and really BAD scientific paper that ALLEGEDLY first supported masks, at an essential moment in their political advancement, based on terrible US state-by-state data then available. Even disregarding the bad underlying data – the problems of which were not known at that time – the authors committed a shocking number of egregious and grievous scientific sins in order to help prop up the narrative that “masks work”. This has been dealt with elsewhere by other scientists – I just bring your attention to this graph which literally mocks the very idea of “cause and effect” to its face. See if you can see what I mean. “Read the graph”, and see how THEY DID NOT.
The Chinese authors, in an American university, were not “following the data” to see where it led. They were NARRATIVE-FITTING. And this BAD work was in a PRESTIGIOUS JOURNAL.
I’m not claiming these Chinese authors were part of a conspiracy. I *AM* claiming that they were engaged in almost irresistible socialist virtue signalling to a media narrative, according to the known psychology of people exposed to – and trained by – Chinese communism. And, increasingly, by American communism.
It is a subtle difference, between conspiracy and conformity, or really between EITHER ONE and a conspiracy to generate conformity, which IS communism, but it is something that Americans will have to begin to understand, as we begin to pry REAL science from the mouth of the dragon.
Now, if you go out and look for it, you will find all kinds of Chinese science that rushes out to support media narratives on COVID-19. Not universally, but enough. It’s a TWO-WAY STREET. The media will PICK and HIGHLIGHT virtue-signalling work that conforms to its desired narrative, so that “the winner” is not picked by science, but by the media. It really is a sweet scam.
The trouble is, however, that sometimes the “meeting of the narrative” is simply overdone – it becomes ridiculous. In some cases, the CCP will “crow” too loudly over a self-demeaning victim. In others, the victim will rush out SO HARD to the narrative, for virtue signal points, that they self-demean at humorous levels.
Horrible optics indeed.
MASKS are a strong part of this psychology, but it goes far deeper. CCP virtue-signalers will self-debase in the most remarkable ways.
Sometimes you can play along with this virtue signalling for personal advantage. For instance, because my lungs have been damaged by the China Virus, masks give me nasty hypoxia, pushing my limited oxygenation ability over the edge. My solution is to wear a super-dorky face shield INSTEAD of a mask.
People know in their hearts that whatever weird spit-spray-blocking utility masks may have – and there is some, undoubtedly – it is obviously not as strong with face shields. HOWEVER, face shields are far more dorky, stupid, and self-debasing. They are a STRONGER virtue signal than a mask like everybody else is wearing. So by using a STRONGER virtue signal that is less effective but easier on my ultimate victim status as a COVID recoveree, I basically grant myself some “COVID privilege”.
It’s all BULLSHIT – but I go along with it, to go easy on my lungs, and to not give my enemies a chance to generate a conflict scenario, were I not wearing a mask at all.
NOW – let’s get to the biggie – the example par excellence of scientific virtue signalling to China on COVID-19.
This science-world self-debasement is entirely analogous to two art-world analogs – pinnacles of cultural debasement of Western art, those being the “golden anti-Trump toilet” and the “giant artwork vagina of Versailles” – two of the most extreme cultural Marxist societal debasements in existence.
This scientific paper – renamed by Wolf Moon to translate into its CCP-over-USA ChiNazi political reality – is:
“Why Americans should not flush the toilet, to keep from spreading COVID-19”
I am not kidding you.
THIS work is featured in Molenium Magazine (i.e., C&EN) immediately after the same highly worthy work on mutated spike proteins that I just told you about, and that is leading to successful vaccines. Both articles are 3 pages long – yet they tell such different tales.
First, the HIGH ROAD OF SCIENCE – what China steals. Then, the LOW ROAD OF SCIENCE – what China leaves on our doorstep in a flaming bag.
The first article describes vaccine work that can FREE US from the stupidity of COVID-19 lockdowns.
This work, in contrast, is perfectly set up to give CCP-controlled communist Democrats a veritable softball of concern to start regulating our TOILETS in new and even stupider ways than they already have.
“SOLAR TOILET AIR RECYCLING PUMPS [MADE IN CHINA] WORK!”
Yes, I can hear it now. FAKE SCIENCE breeds FAKE TECH while CHINA GETS AHEAD.
Just STOP for a moment and realize how much this is like the ChiCom who derailed our technical meetings with picayune concerns that WORKED on STUPID AMERICANS.
There haven’t been any confirmed cases of people catching COVID-19 through exposure to the virus from feces or urine. But some researchers—and many people who need to find a bathroom while on the road—wonder if public toilets pose an infection risk.
Earlier this year, Yun-Yun Li, Ji-Xiang Wang, and Xi Chen at Southeast University were concerned about this exact question and used computational fluid dynamics models to determine how flushing the toilet can drive water from the toilet bowl into the air. According to their model, a flushing toilet generates a cloud of thousands of aerosol droplets that rises about a meter into the air if the lid is up (Phys. Fluids 2020, DOI: 10.1063/5.0013318). They also modeled how urinal flushing can produce aerosols (Phys. Fluids 2020, DOI: 10.1063/5.0021450). These weren’t the first studies to show that flushing generates aerosols, but the researchers hoped their models might nudge the public to consider bathroom hygiene more during the pandemic.
This picture says it all:
OK, maybe not. Maybe THIS ONE says it all.
The best part? TWO PAGES LATER, a paid insert for a Chinese university, AUTHORED by a staff writer for C&EN.
Look. It’s time to stop being FOOLS. The CCP will DESTROY whatever it cannot be. And it cannot be good, so it must DESTROY good. It is already destroying science with politics. The CCP doesn’t care if the publicly “agreed” climate science is a CROCK. All it cares about is that IT knows the truth, and plans accordingly, while everybody else is MISLED.
The CCP will try to MISLEAD Western science by HOOK or by CROOK. Wake up, and TURN IT OFF.
PREMIERE 10/25 at 7:30pm ET on @AmThoughtLeader! pic.twitter.com/rpLFRfMNzM
(@GoatedGregYT) 
