Tag: CDC

Dear KMAG: 20231016 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And yes, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get through it!

We will always remember Wheatie,

Pray for Trump,

Yet have fun,

and HOLD ON when things get crazy!

We will follow the RULES of civility that Wheatie left for us:

Wheatie’s Rules:

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

And while we engage in vigorous free speech, we will remember Wheatie’s advice on civility, non-violence, and site unity:

“We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

“Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

If this site gets shut down, please remember various ways to get back in touch with the rest of the gang:

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.

Word of The Week:

Pfizer-affirming care

noun

  • mRNA-based coronavirus vaccines manufactured by Pfizer
  • the dual-component COVID drug paxlovid
  • any drug or vaccine made by Pfizer or a subsidiary thereof.
  • prescription or administration of any of the above
  • legislation supporting any of the above
  • mandating any of the above

Shown in a picture

Shown in another picture

Assorted Tweets

On oldie but goody.

This post just makes me smile, too.

New CDC Director in 3….2….1….

While I think Rochelle’s replacement is pretty clueless, I did find one of her college pictures, when she was, like, totally serious!

Looks like Elon has a new vintage toy!

Truly, it is nice having a Twitter X CEO (no, I don’t mean Dorsey) who gets it.

What the heck! This chick will NOT get out of my Twitter X feed!

Bay area. Well, THAT makes sense.

And then there’s this. An important point.

Amen.

No, not that plan. The other one. The one that includes this plan, all other plans, and itself.

So how does that work?

Sorry – it’s complicated. Maybe just Trust In God for now!

How did they put it?

ENJOY THE SHOW

W

Why I’m Glad I Watched the Ken Burns PBS Propaganda Special Blaming the Holocaust on America’s Evil Trump Supporters (Or Their Terrible Nativist Parents and Grandparents)

TL;DR – Watch this sucker while ignoring the myopic neo-Bolshevik “refugee” propaganda, but instead keeping in mind the current COVID/WEF insanity, to get a grip on the incipient climate-excused holocaust of the depopulationists, which is the fault of SOCIALISM, same as the soon-to-be-dwarfed “Holocaust” of the 1930s and 1940s.

OK – just a bit more detail…..

Don’t watch the Ken Burns Holocaust special for any of the slanted, leftist, socialist messaging stapled onto the historical facts in a DNC-approved and ADL-edited way.

Watch this PBS special while subversively keeping in mind the new socialist, depopulationist, eco-nuttery holocaust which now exceeds 6 million COVID dead and will soon DWARF the old “Holocaust” of so much hypocritical and self-centered angst.

Calmly stroke Suspicious Cat, as the Holocaust is falsely linked to rejection of current “asylum seekers” in a face-palmingly stereotypical and Trump-hating way.

Watch this PBS special while “rebelliously” remembering that RIGHT NOW we are in a DESIGNED CRASH of the world economy, which will kill BILLIONS of innocent people if not stopped – and which is largely driven with the eager participation of globalist and socialist “Jazis” – who are no less evil than the Nazis of old – self-righteous in their “ESG/DEI” zeal, with their vain self-assurance that they and they alone know the answers which must be forced upon the world.

Watch this special remembering Andrew Cuomo, Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baric, Joe Biden, WEF, Klaus Schwab, Pfizer, CCP and Albert Bourla, and keeping close in mind, the NEW holocaust which has already killed over 6 million worldwide by the virus ALONE, and is already creating even-more-massive excesses in mortality in every country, in unacknowledged proportion to acceptance of the “vaccines”.

Watch this PBS propaganda special while remembering how the US and China co-created biological “gain of function” which literally DWARFS the mere chemical nastiness of a bug spray, “Zyklon B”, itself more comparable to Fauci’s murderous remdesivir, or the midazolam they apparently used for “COVID euthanasia” in the UK.

Watch this special while remembering the millions who died around the world from both virus and vaccines, including tens of thousands of Israelis, as secular Jewish leaders condemned their own and didn’t lift a finger, other than to censor Zev Zelenko, and to suppress their own report on the dangers of the vaccines they INVESTED IN.

Watch this special in strict analogy of the THEN unbelievability of the “final solution”, to the NOW unbelievability of “depopulation”.

Realize that the problem isn’t antisemitism or “refugee acceptance” – it’s SOCIALISM.

SOCIALISM KILLS – no matter which brand.

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) were joined by Democratic lawmakers from both the House and Senate on February 7, 2019, to introduce Green New Deal legislation.

Oh, hell. I said enough already. Do I really need to explain this?

If so, I’ll do it in the comments.

But the bottom line is that this special has a lot of great facts, which – if you are prepared to see them in the context of current events – are quite convincing that we ARE in the late beginning of yet another socialist holocaust.

Buckle up.

W

PS – Oh yeah – the URL…..

https://www.pbs.org/kenburns/us-and-the-holocaust/

PPS – The Depopulation Series – a Bibliography

The Population Control Shot – Introduction

The Population Control Shot – New Sodompox Limited Edition

The Population Control Shot – Did Bill Gates Gaffe, Troll, Let it Slip, Or None of the Above?

The Population Control Shot – CDC Backs Out of the Shot-Up Saloon Like Nothing Happened

The Population Control Shot – Understanding the Peoples Climate Temple

Three Little Graphs That Say It’s All One Big Lie

TL;DR – This post explains three graphs which all gave me “AHA” moments when I saw them. They all reveal lies in public science, which are used to manipulate humanity. Strategic and fundamental lies in climate science and planetary history are used to justify more tactical lies in energy and medicine. Together, these three graphs indict the sabotaged and weaponized public science which is being used against humanity.

All of this conforms to a concise and remarkably prescient warning by President (and former General) Dwight D. Eisenhower.

While there is much deep science in each graph, certain basic principles are easily seen without a technical background. Those ideas provide the “wait a second” thought needed for proper scientific skepticism.

If you want to get the “executive tour” and finish this in under 5 minutes, just read through anything that says TL;DR in bold, and the images next to the headline text. If you have 30 minutes, watch the videos next to TL;DR. If you have an hour or two, read everything.

If you read THIS paragraph, then consider the slow route. Or consider doing the TL;DR fast track first, and then coming back for the full ride.

Mood Music

Introduction

I wanted to keep this short, but I know that’s almost impossible. I’ve put off this post until I was ready, but I wasn’t ready until I heard this music (see above), while reading over an older post that aged well in a variety of ways.

The Molnupiravir Contradiction

Why would we mass treat a virus with a drug which forces the virus to mutate, when mutation is how the virus creates new variants that reinfect the vaccinated? Before I explain the title contradiction, let me start with an admission. Most of my life, I have been very friendly with the pharmaceutical industry. I …

The point I saw was that mass formation psychosis has been used at all levels of science, and the only way for us to fix science now is

MASS FORMATION AWARENESS.

Be part of it. NOW.

Q = MFA

(The equation is a bit of a joke – but you are welcome to elaborate it humorously, fellow nerds.)

I had thought that maybe I was putting off this post until the last post was done, but the next post was always the last one, and I knew that I would always find just one more post to do first.

Nope. Now is the time. The last “Wheatie” post is in the can, strengthening my soul, and in hearing this song that I used for it, while knowing that we are on the right path, I’m suddenly ready.

There is a certain beautiful sadness in knowing that I’ve remained silent about even ONE lie for far too long. And now, with THREE beautiful lies – three FURIES against mankind – it’s time to take them all on.

More Mood Music

(A song literally about mass formation psychosis.)

It’s The Jabs

TL;DR – The Ethical Skeptic analyzed CDC data for causes of death in the US. By looking at deaths caused by blood and immune disorders, but not by COVID itself, vs. projections from pre-COVID data, two things show up – more “late” deaths related to COVID, and a MUCH BIGGER group of similar deaths that started precisely with the jabs.

You can see this in the graph as space between the two curves, widening first in Spring 2020 (twice), and much more in April 2021, coincident with the biggest deployment of the jabs.

I’m pretty sure Ethical Skeptic doesn’t believe in God, but that does nothing to keep me from saying “Thank God for Ethical Skeptic”. When Truth is an unyielding goal of individuals, they don’t need to agree on what Truth is, to create a world of good faith.

It was gil00 who brought me this tweet, wondering if it was important. I told her at the time that I needed to do a post on it, but that is just the beginning of its importance. Tradebait, Gail Combs, and the rest of the gang, also saw that this was a biggie.

The fact that it contains one of three graphs that “change everything”, should give you an idea of exactly how important I think it is.

ALL Americans need to understand this graph.

No – I take that back. All intelligent life within the sphere of influence of this planet and this moment need to understand this graph. THEY THE PEOPLE need to understand exactly who they’re dealing with.

Let’s blow that up a bit…..

Before telling you WHY, let me assure you that there are MANY more graphs like this, which will all say roughly the same thing – IF one is honest enough to let the data talk. I choose this graph because it’s probably the clearest and simplest that I’ve seen so far – due in large part to its creator, The Ethical Skeptic, or “TES” as I will refer to him now.

We have talked about TES’s work before, since he emerged as one of the most skillful and impossible-to-censor critics of what might be called “Fauci science”. I may quibble with minor points on his more far-reaching hypotheses and theories, but I always find that his general and bigger principles “age spectacularly well”, and are best taken very seriously at the earliest possible moment.

Again, hence the need for this post.

Here is what I said originally – it was my “initial reaction”. You don’t have to follow it too closely, unless you find it all obvious. I’m going to explain this in detail.

By looking just at blood and immune disorders, and comparing mortality of 2018-2019 (pre-COVID) as a baseline (which was then extended by seasonal extrapolation into 2020, 2021 and 2022, with normal population increase meaning a slight increase in deaths), and then looking at 2018-2022 actual for all years, using the actual figures, but removing COVID, one can see the population reduction effect of the jabs, as the excess cardio and immune mortality, which just keeps increasing with time.

It’s clear as a bell in the data, when one compares to the “expected deaths based on the last two years of pre-COVID times”.

The striking thing is how STRONGLY the sum which includes 2020 and 2021 deviates away from the prior years, starting exactly with the jabs.

2020 includes TESTING of jabs.
2021 includes DEPLOYMENT of jabs.
2022 includes BOOSTING of jabs.

It’s a depop shot. And it works. All they would have had to do is dial up the dose just enough, while normalizing the deaths with the media, and it’s totally tunable to the rate of depop that one desires.

OK – so what does all that mean?

Let’s take it slower.

First of all, at any time, you can go to theethicalskeptic.com and check out his article on this topic, which does not YET have THIS particular graph (except in the comments), but which will likely have said graph in the next two parts of the article.

Houston, We Have a Problem (Part 1 of 3)

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/08/20/houston-we-have-a-problem-part-1-of-3/

I also call your attention to this highlighted point made near the beginning of the article.

Nonetheless, by the end of 2021 it had become abundantly clear that US citizens were not just dying of Covid-19 to the excess, they were also now dying of something else, and at a rate which eventually became higher than that of Covid itself.

The Ethical Skeptic, Houston, We Have a Problem (Part 1 of 3)

If you just read that, where TES couches his words VERY carefully, and you know what he’s hinting at, then you know why I said this is one of the three big graphs you need to understand. He ain’t lyin’. My only quibble is that I suspect that his estimate of “decades” of damage to health policy may be conservative, and “centuries” is a horrifying possibility.

Are you ready to dig into the graph?

GOOD. Here we go.

Let’s start with some ACRONYMS.

  • NHCS = National Center for Health Statistics
  • MCD = MCoD = Multiple Cause of Death
  • UCoD = Underlying Cause of Death
  • ICD-10 = International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision
  • MMWR = Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • wk = week
  • M-Avg = moving average (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_average)
  • Dnm (n = 5-8, m = 0-9) = Death codes

This is enough to understand it fully.

The basic graph is DEATHS going up on the left, and TIME going across from left to right, over a period of YEARS.

The DEATHS on the left are showing from 350 per week (at the bottom left) to 950 per week (at the top left). That means that we are not seeing the 0-350 region, which is featureless and below the portion of the graph that we can see. It’s a legitimate suppression – it’s not hiding anything except relative magnitudes of the changes to a SMALL extent, and it helps us see the differences in those changes better. It’s a magnifier – just remember that it’s there.

The title says that this is US-NCHS data for Multiple Cause of Death, meaning it’s looking at all causes of death listed on death certificates in the US and then databased by the National Center for Health Statistics, which is part of the CDC. This database is then searchable online.

The title also says that this data is for SELECTED cause-of-death codes listed in the ICD-10 system. The data runs up to week 29 of 2022, and is adjusted for the lag in reporting to CDC at the end (see right-hand side).

Let’s jump briefly to the topic of those codes.

Using the drop-down buttons you can see in the image, TES has chosen death codes 50-89, but has excluded COVID-19. Those codes are briefly described as “diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs” (but excluding COVID-19). TES has also selected ALL ages.

In the lower left you can see several descriptions of that different groups of the D-codes mean. Generally speaking, these are related to blood, blood-forming organs, and some immune problems. We will quote from TES himself about these later.

This does NOT include cardiac arrests, strokes, and certain other “stereotypical” clot-shot diseases, but it DOES include more “obscure” diseases that we can intuitively expect would be affected by both COVID and the CLOT SHOT. Thus, it serves as a kind of sensitive test for “something bad in the blood”.

A critical point for understanding is in the subtitle below the title.

2020/21/22 Compared to Baseline 2018/19

What this means is that what we are really doing OVERALL is looking at the 3 years of data “from and after Wuhan COVID”, 2020-2022, and comparing those numbers to “before Wuhan COVID”, 2018-2019. This explains why there are TWO curves on the graph. But in order to do this VALIDLY, we have to PROJECT the numbers from 2018-2019 FORWARD into the next three years, since the baseline would automatically increase on its own. Thus, we have TWO CURVES that run for all 5 years.

It helps to look at the red dashed curve first. This is listed as 2018-2019 Baseline 5 week moving average. Don’t worry about the “moving average” stuff. What this does is to take a bunch of scattered points and smooths them into closer points that can be used to draw a curve through them. It’s a neat trick to create the “best curve through scattered points”.

You can see that this is a bumpy “sawtooth” curve, higher in the winter, lower in the summer, and slowly rising over time. Typically, over time, this is what you see. Every year can be predicted largely from one or more prior years. You just take the past, find all the patterns you can, and project them all into the future.

There is a related red note in the lower left corner of the graph that says “1.4% baseline growth rate”. This is the annual growth in the baseline numbers from 2018-2019. The numbers vary rather strongly from month to month, but not much year from year, meaning that it’s easy to predict what they SHOULD look like in future years, such as 2020, 2021, and 2022. Each year will look pretty much like the last, months and weeks will go up and down, but day to day it will be 1.4% higher than the previous year, following the patterns of previous years.

This idea works remarkably well.

OK – so what is the pink solid line? THAT is the ACTUAL NUMBERS, for all five years, from week to week, using a 7-week moving average, and reporting it as the LAST week of the seven weeks. This is where we’re going to find any interesting phenomena.

The use of a DIFFERENT number of weeks for the multi-week moving average serves as a kind of sanity check in the region where both curves derive from the same ACTUAL data (2018-2019). The curves will not be much different, and the differences are just an artifact of the methodology, but if you see a big difference in that region of the same actual data in both curves, it’s probably meaningful, and probably something WRONG in your processing of the data.

Any minor differences you DO see in the region of actual data vs. itself (2018-2019), serve as a nice comparison of SCALE to any systematic differences you see in the 2020-2022 region, which is the region of ACTUAL DATA (pink solid) versus PROJECTED DATA (red dashed).

For example, if TES has a similar graph for some code like automobile accidents or choking on food, you can confidently predict that ACTUAL data for 2020-2022 should match the curve for PROJECTED DATA from 2018-2019 fairly closely – apart from any unexpected societal effects of COVID such as lockdowns, but those would then appear rationally in the data.

SO WHAT DO WE SEE?

TL;DR – the actual deaths begin to exceed the projected deaths in stages, with a lesser jump happening due to COVID itself, but a far bigger jump (over 2.5 times as big) happening after people began taking the jabs in a big way in April of 2021.

Looking at the two curves with the innocence of a child, we see them separating in stages. We see them separate a certain amount (call it 1X) during spring and early summer of 2020 (call this region 1), then separating about twice as much (2-3X) during summer, fall and winter of 2020, and early spring of 2021 (region 2). Then, in late spring of 2021, the separation grows suddenly and substantially (7-10X) (region 3), and it just keeps growing into 2022 (15X+).

This is NOT an accident. TES knew that the vaccines began being given in a big way around week 14 of 2021 (early mid-April), as shown by this graph.

TL;DR – this additional graph shows how the slope (derivative) of total jab doses given is used to see when most of the jabs were administered. This is near the beginning of dosing, and explains the sudden rapid widening between the two curves in the primary graph. It’s a “pandemic of vaccination” much like COVID itself.

Based on this date, TES looked for ICD codes which show a dramatic WIDENING at “Critical Inflection 1” – meaning when the jabs were introduced (what I called the beginning of region 3), VERSUS any prior widening in spring of 2020, when COVID-19 of the Wuhan strain was introduced (what I called the beginning of “region 1”).

Stated differently, TES is only counting things which appeared dramatically MORE for the jabs, than they did for COVID itself.

Basically, TES is being “too fair” to the jabs. We know that there are many causes of death by both COVID and the JABS, “because spike protein”, but if it’s not overwhelmingly obvious IN THE DATA that they’re significantly and primarily due to the jabs, he’s not counting them.

He’s letting a bunch of jab deaths “get away”, to make sure that he’s indicting only real jab deaths.

As a side-note, this is what Gregg Phillips did with True The Vote’s geospatial data, by only counting the most blatant and obviously organized mule data (10 drop boxes and 5 stash houses). It becomes almost impossible to criticize the science, when data is winnowed down to exclude even the most marginally debatable data.

Deny the unethical skeptics even a foothold, and they cannot even begin to raise an unethical argument.

Pretty BOSS LEVEL if you ask me.

Here is what TES has to say about the ICD codes that he used.

With regard to these select ICD-10 codes, I have endeavored to highlight only those which have exhibited a stark difference between their arrival patterns during the 2020 pandemic period, and that period after MMWR Week 14 2021. While there are indeed increases in deaths incumbent inside the other ICD-10 codes, those increases appeared to plausibly conform to their same arrival patterns for 2020 as well. In other words, they appeared to be heavily Covid-related in their dynamics, both before and after the Week 14 2021 inflection.

Of particular concern, are those deaths which relate to body-wide regulatory systems as opposed to specific organs or causes. In other words, cancer and lymphomas, heart, autonomous myocarditis/pericarditis/conductive disorders, injuries to the liver and kidneys, etc. These are not only the canaries in the coal mine in terms of pathology, but may serve to indicate as well that a pervasive systemic disruption is at play inside the average US citizen human physiology, especially over the last 71 weeks. These are the death groups which exhibit the most stark trend of increase post MMWR Week 14 2021.

There have nevertheless been some attempts to “take down” TES’s analysis, but after two of them were burnt to a crisp on Twitter, it’s pretty clear that these attacks were not “ethical skepticism”, but in fact beautiful examples of what has happened to science in the wake of politicization and corruption. One academic was even outed by a sharp Twitter user as a practiced shill for the Faucism narrative, referred to humorously as “a regular on the fact-check circuit”.

NOW, knowing what the graph means – that the cure turned out to be worse than the disease (something which Trump said could not happen, thus forcing a coup to maintain the plot) – it is really worth it to go back and read TES’s article, if you have not already.

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/08/20/houston-we-have-a-problem-part-1-of-3/

It’s tough science, but even if you just “kinda get it”, it’s WORTH IT.

It is important to read the comments at the end, too. Not only does TES have links to his Twitter defenses, and the graph highlighted in this article appears – there is comment by somebody who did a rough calculation based on mRNA therapies that have failed human trials in the past. Based on his calculations…. well, let me just quote.

Great work. I did a small quick model using a Gaussian Distribution over 9 years to see what the numbers would be each year for “events” given 80% of the total population vaccinated had active ingredients and would develop events similar to past other mRNA failed trials. 7,887 deaths per week is about 179% above my model for 2022. If the past is indeed playing out here, this excess deaths per week will increase by a factor of 9 over the next year. Most adverse events in past similar trials did not take place until year three. By year six, 84% of the cohort was positive for adverse events.

https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/08/20/houston-we-have-a-problem-part-1-of-3/#comment-12577

TL;DR – It’s now very likely that these late jab deaths will increase dramatically during the next few years, based on mRNA therapy trial information which was available but seemingly ignored.

Watch this video if you have 3 minutes.

I would even go so far as to say that this highly censored video of an alleged mRNA trial participant from several years ago (see above), breaking his NDA and claiming serious cardiac problems affecting almost all of the people in his trial, may not be a fraud.

If that video is entirely true, then based on his numbers, my assessment is that his trial was very likely a secret depopulation trial flying under the false flag of a secret mRNA therapy trial. Which may then make COVID-19 and the jabs, the mother of all false flags.

In my opinion it is important to force the finding and recognition of the truth, so that we can begin saving the people who are not lucky.

Any effort to work toward #TeamHeadsOnPikes to prevent the next one of these incidents from happening, is a separate problem I leave for others. I’m a bit too good at forgiving.

TL;DR – There has been plenty of data telling us that the jabs are problematic, but now we are faced with very clear proof that CDC must easily see in their own data, yet pretends not to see. Combine these two memes.

The illogical arguments conceal real goals and tactics.

Buckle up. They know we know, and they have a plan for it.

Even More Mood Music

(Because you must FEAR CARBZILLA!)

https://youtu.be/BJHuX_jeSf4

Carbon Dioxide Is Life’s Friend and Savior

TL;DR – This graph shows terrestrial life’s remarkably high tolerance for carbon dioxide (which is basically recirculating plant life), but poor tolerance of meteoric impacts during times of low CO2 and preliminary glaciation. We are being severely gaslit, to see climate science backwards, and to operate from reflexive fears which prevent full, true and larger understanding.

The graph you see above is NOT the first one that I saw, which blew my mind, but it’s very similar. The one I saw was basically the orange line, and may have been GEOCARB III or a comparable study. It had the exact same principle features, which told me the same things.

Apparently I missed the “mass formation psychosis” in climate science, and just happened to walk in with my “They Live” glasses on.

Let me state for the record that “I am neither a professional geologist nor an earth scientist, but I have loved the subjects my whole life, and I can read a graph.”

More crucially, I have always been an “allied science fan” of geology and earth science – in part because earth chemistry and earth biology happen on this wonderful planet called Earth. Follow either of these sciences back to the basics, and earth science matters.

Back to the graph.

It’s worth explaining the basics of the scale across the bottom, which is time.

We are at the very end of the graph – a slice so thin that our lives will not show up even under a magnifier. Bring out a microscope and see a tiny hair’s breadth under it. That’s us.

We are at the most recent edge of the Neogene – which is the N on the bottom of the graph. That N is 23 million years. The “preparatory ancestry” of anything strongly resembling our kind easily fits into that, as best as we can tell. You might call it “the age of man“, where man includes pre-men and barely men.

Probably even these guys and gals.

Humans trying to understand climate science.

Next to the left is the Paleogene, abbreviated Pg. This is the “age of mammals“. You will note that while it is much bigger than the Neogene, it is still a VERY SMALL fraction of the history of life on the planet.

Let’s blow it up a bit, using a DIFFERENT type of graph, which is more of a timeline. More recent is at the top.

The three most significant climate events of that time period are on the right. They all bear explanation.

First, Antarctica got its first RECENT permanent ice sheets only a bit over 50 million years ago, near the END of this prior period, and the start of the “age of man”. When you see NOVA specials about Antarctic dinosaurs, or read about fossil specimens from Antarctica, this is why you see them. Antarctica used to be WARM, and gradually cooled down.

Interestingly, Antarctica has never* (*not settled) strayed far from the South Pole. It has not wandered “north-south” as much as many other land masses.

LIFE has at most times covered the entire globe. Life had not RETREATED from the poles to the extent that is has now. Indeed, polar life may have assisted in recovery from some mass extinctions, where prompt damage occurred primarily at the middle latitudes due to normal circulation patterns.

Next, look at the event called “PETM”, which stands for Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum. It’s actually a SPIKE that looks like the thin spike in THIS graph.

This graph is looking at global temperatures (green curve) as determined from oxygen isotopes, VERSUS time, across the “age of mammals”. Recent is on the right.

WOW. Will you look at how much temperatures have fallen. And look at that crazy chaotic glaciation in the lower right, flirting repeatedly with the snowball Earth of the Permian Extinction (to be discussed in a bit).

I don’t know about y’all, but if I had to be concerned about something, it might be that.

TL;DR – it is impossible to look a graphs which show life bottoming hard against planetary freeze, in the big picture of carbon dioxide (recirculating plant life) bottoming hard in conjunction, and walk away with any true sympathy for worries about increasing CO2 and warming. CO2 in times of its relative absence is either not a problem, or a “good problem”. It appears to me that a cultivated science error has been used to create a social hysteria and then a mass formation psychosis.

In a sense, we are ALL the “polar bears of the dinosaurs”. Is that a good thing? I think it’s worth asking, even just theoretically, never implying the need to “do something” about it.

Anyway, that little SPIKE you see in the spiky curve to the left, is an actual example of a “climate change crisis”. It was probably due to sudden period of massive volcanic activity throwing a bunch of CO2 into the air, although that’s not “settled science”. If there was a weird “solar excursion”, or undersea heating of the oceans (see extremely useful “non-eruptive volcanism” proposals by TES for part of recent global warming), then it could have been something else. Whatever it was, it seems to have been sharp enough to have probably been a single thing.

Note also that Earth got to the same point some years later, anyway.

Don’t fear the seasons. They’re not the reaper.

Lastly, we see in the timeline, at the beginning of the Paleogene, the K-Pg mass extinction, (also called, in its evidentiary form, the K-T boundary) which was almost certainly due to an asteroid impact, but possibly also reinforced by subsequent volcanism.

You may recall Steve’s post about this, but if you don’t, then take a quick detour and refresh your memory on the details.

Iridium: The Smoke From The Smoking Gun

4.567 billion years ago, our solar system began to “condense” from the nebula. Clumps of dust particles began to come together, part of a poorly-understood process that eventually led to the planets. The nebula had a potpourri of “stuff” in it. Mostly elements up to iron, with a heavy leavening of ones after iron, created in supernovas or even neutron star collisions. (Most gold is believed to have come out of neutron star collisions…next time you admire that gold coin or your wedding band…think about where that stuff has been! Any of it not from a collision got blasted out of a supernova at 70,000,000 miles per hour.)……

https://www.theqtree.com/2021/04/03/2021%c2%b704%c2%b703-joe-biden-didnt-win-daily-thread/

Steve explained that while most of paleontology favors the “impact theory”, there has been a long-standing volcanic theory of the extinction, and even a group who believes that BOTH theories are not only correct, but connected.

With my taste for “AND logic”, you can predict where I would most likely fall in that debate – in the “it’s both of them, and they’re connected” camp.

Does that sound sketchy? Maybe a little too much of a coincidence? Is Wolf going out on a limb here?

Notice that by mentioning that Steve had mentioned this “theory of both”, I used PEER INFLUENCE to change your minds. Now I will use MSM acceptance to further change your minds.

TL;DR – Theories about impacts leading to increased volcanism also implicated in extinctions, are quite appealing to me, personally, as a kind of “general volcanism” (impact + rebound), but the whole thing is NOT settled science by any means. Just remember what I always say about “AND logic”. It solves scientific divisions, too.

But wait – I want to make a point about the Fake News in action, spinning science to keep it divided.

Yes, you see the “AND” logic right in the title. And if you read the article, the whole point is that there is increasing evidence of a causal connection between the impact and the volcanism.

But notice the wording in the title versus the subtitle. The title tells you, but does not emphasize, that the conjoint, causatively connected, unified theory brings two scientific camps together, both being correct. Then the subtitle tries to shift things over to one of the explanations, and to minimize the role of the impact.

“The 160 million-year reign of the ‘terrible lizards’ may actually have ended due to events in India rather than an asteroid crashing into the sea off the coast of Mexico as previously thought“

“RATHER THAN”?

“Rather than” an asteroid the size of Mount Everest?

It’s very clear folks – THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED.

By now you know, it’s just what they do. DIVIDE AND CONQUER. Indeed, I tend to think it’s what they’re TRAINED to do.

The FAKE NEWS controls science FAR MORE than most scientists are willing to admit.

But let’s get back to our story of the unified theory of impact AND rebound volcanism.

The primary CLIMATIC effects of the asteroid impact are believed to have been blast heating, followed by an “impact winter”, followed by chaotic climate, possibly including a greenhouse due to vaporized CO2 and SO2, followed by the same thing from further classic volcanism. The whole planet was definitely MESSED UP.

TL;DR –

HOT (impact). COLD (darkness). HOT AGAIN (greenhouse).

Then repeat the latter two for post-impact volcanism.

A constant, unified pattern of impact extinctions, layered on the preexisting, livable climate, at a surprisingly wide range of levels of carbon dioxide.

So what was there before that?

THE DINOSAURS. That is “K”, the Cretaceous Period (in English).

You will notice that T (or Tr), J and K are the three big periods of the dinosaurs with which most of us are familiar – the Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous.

Let’s look at our graph again.

Yes. This “age of dinosaurs” was a period of warm temperatures and high carbon dioxide. Both much higher than what we have now, but – bear with me – there was a lot of LIFE, too – am I not right?

Well, what’s that stuff to the LEFT of the “age of dinosaurs” – around the end of “C” (Carboniferous) and the beginning of “P” (Permian – the “age of reptiles”)?

Why, it looks like low carbon dioxide, almost as low as we have now. In FACT, if you look even further back in time to the left – at the ages of sea organisms (Cm, O, S), fishes (D), and amphibians (C), what you’re basically seeing is a CRASH of carbon dioxide, ending in LOW CO2 around C and P.

And interesting that this slide had already resulted in massive glaciation of the planet, which existed at the beginning of the Permian.

Interesting that there were THREE BIG EXTINCTIONS along that slide, at O, D, and finally at P.

There is a LOT of debate about these extinctions, and particularly the near-total Permian (P) Extinction, also sometimes known as the P-T extinction event, because it occurred at the END of the Permian and the beginning of the Triassic.

Of course, global warming explanations of this event are favored by the single-minded corporate media, but IMO some of the best theories of the P-T extinction are actually based on an “iceball Earth” scenario, for which there is some interesting geological evidence.

The idea that an already glaciated Earth (Permian) was sent into deep freeze by an impact and response volcanism makes sense, and we would expect the extinctions to be more extensive than with the less glaciated or non-glaciated Cretaceous extinction of the dinosaurs, which happened to a generally warmer planet, thus sparing mammals and birds.

TL;DR – As the most significant extinctions have occurred at times of low CO2 and high glaciation, the main danger to life on Earth seems not to be global warming from CO2, which protects life from near-total extinctions. The main threat is solar blocking (see Bill Gates) and deep cooling, caused by meteoric impacts and rebound volcanism, which is more dangerous during times of low CO2 and high glaciation, like now or during the Permian Extinction.

In fact, I find the idea that we can use a single extinction mechanism repeatedly – a mechanism of “impact plus response volcanism, leading to plant death and further crises”, with the differences in outcome depending upon the size and location of the impact, plus the prior state of the climate, to be very satisfying – particularly in explaining why we find evidence for ALL of the various divided theories.

Furthermore, if response volcanism is a correct theory, then the general warmth and higher carbon dioxide of the “age of dinosaurs” may be explained by a truly massive impact being not only the cause of the P-T extinction, but also creating hundreds of millions of years of increased volcanism in its wake.

But all of that is debatable.

The big picture is this. Look at the graph again.

TL;DR – The Earth has supported life easily for eons because of MORE carbon dioxide, not less. There is no “climate emergency”, and certainly not one related to increasing carbon dioxide for ANY reason at this point. If anything, incipient normal solar cooling and periodic ice age glaciation are actual climate concerns for society. But that is another story for another time.

One More Bit of Mood Music

(Real World by Matchbox 20)

Green Energy Is Pol Pot Madness

TL;DR – Even if there was a “climate emergency” (which there is not, see above), and even if “green energy” worked (which it does not, see graph), and even if green energy could “save the environment” (which it absolutely does the opposite, due to energy density fundamentals), what we are doing by forcing a sudden transition to a non-working energy infrastructure, is so utterly preposterous, wrong, and irrational, that it must be stopped.

This graph is the smoking gun of an intentional civilizational crash. It is our duty to grab the steering wheel and stop it.

This graph is probably the simplest to explain because it does not depend on the truth or falsehood of the underlying bad science that has been used to justify what is being done now.

There are some things you just don’t do.

It’s like an insane person coming into your house screaming “DANGER, DANGER” and pointing a gun at you. Even if there is some reason, it doesn’t matter – an insane person is pointing a gun at you, and THAT is the immediate danger. The evil person or people who SENT the insane person to your house must be dealt with, too, or this will keep happening. But that can happen after we survive the insane attack.

Humanity is being “swatted” by people made insane by – you guessed it – mass formation psychosis.

TL;DR – One cannot move humanity from the top curve in red, to the bottom curve in yellow, without killing most of them. It’s impossible. It means poverty, chaos, and destruction. The closest thing to what “somebody” is forcing on the West, is what China and the CIA did the the people of Cambodia, using the highly deluded Khmer Rouge, who insisted that all Cambodians had to leave cities and become agrarian.

Khmer Rouge Flag (Pol Pot)

Forcing humanity to “quit realistic energy now” is perfectly analogous to Pol Pot saying “We all have to become farmers now” at gunpoint, which killed millions of Cambodians in a horror of totalitarian brutality and systematic societal error.

If you don’t think we have a deluded set of Americans who could carry this out, just look at Antifa, filled with mentally ill “trans” males, all of them “politically fluid” and ready to serve the craziest causes, and then politically reverse on orders, the very next day. Antifa is being protected by the DOJ and FBI, which are also ready to stop or hinder any groups which oppose Antifa.

Now you can understand why Antifa and FBI helped each other on January Sixth.

They’re both on the same side – the side of the genocide.

And now Biden wants 87,000 federal “IRS Police”?

What this graph shows is the equivalent of telling a patient addicted to barbiturates that they must quit cold turkey, which is always fatal.

It’s like telling a lifelong juvenile diabetic that they must quit insulin NOW because insulin didn’t come from their own pancreas, and so it’s “foreign”, and no good. They must transition to “mRNA injections in the pancreas” right now! RIGHT NOW!!!

Yup. It is THAT insane – that malevolent – to say “quit all non-green energy now”. To even say “do it in the next century” is foolishness of historic proportions.

We are already seeing the effects of the insanity in the beginning energy problems we are having now. But we have seen NOTHING yet.

Add to THAT insanity, what amounts to yet another foolish collectivization of agriculture, which “error” of communism has repeatedly killed millions, in the Soviet Union and China, as well as in Cambodia, and you can see that the errors of a misled scientific elite are always catastrophic, whether intentional or accidental.

TL;DR – Eisenhower predicted that, in addition to the military industrial complex (MIC), a scientific and technological elite (STE) would become a danger to America and the world, and he even understood and predicted that this very moment might arrive.

If you have time (16 minutes), this presentation is critical to understanding the moment. Every second is worth hearing.

If you get the sense that somebody of malevolent intent was listening to Eisenhower’s speech, and began figuring out how to sabotage his vision of balance and sense, by pursuing a course to enhance and take advantage of precisely the dangers that Eisenhower warned about, then you are not alone.

W

Text of the Eisenhower Farewell Speech

LINK: https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/president-dwight-d-eisenhowers-farewell-address#transcript

My fellow Americans:

Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.

This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.

Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.

Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.

My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.

In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.

******

We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America’s leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.

******

Throughout America’s adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.

Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology-global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle-with liberty at stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research-these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we which to travel.

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs-balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage-balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between action of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.

The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.

******

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peace time, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United State corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system-ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

******

Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society’s future, we-you and I, and our government-must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

******

Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.

Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose difference, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war-as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years-I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.

Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.

******

So-in this my last good night to you as your President-I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find somethings worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.

You and I-my fellow citizens-need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation’s great goals.

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America’s prayerful and continuing inspiration:

We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.

Final Musical Selection

(Dedicated to Trump’s friend Shinzo Abe.)

President Trump & Melania share traditional Japanese dinner with Prime Minister Abe & wife.

FDA Panel Recommends EUA Approval for Novavax Vaccine

In my opinion, the approval of a “likely safer” coronavirus vaccine is – in the long game – a big win for popular science – here’s why.

The approaching approval (or not) of a competing EUA for the NON-mRNA NON-viral-vector NON-genetic Novavax coronavirus vaccine is going to tell us a LOT about how much power Pfizer and China still hold over FDA and CDC.

As you may have read two days ago, I regarded the conveniently timed FDA public statement about the myocarditis risks of the Novavax vaccine as a cynical “pot-vs.-kettle” attempt to sway approval and prevent the entirety of future Novavax data from getting into VAERS, where such data would very likely highlight every possible problem with the mRNA vaccine technology of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

FDA and Pfizer/China Throw Shade on Novavax to Keep Data on Safer Vaccines Out of VAERS

TL;DR – “I believe that mRNA vaccines have serious risks that would be REVEALED by approval of the Novavax vaccine.” -Wolf Moon I’m actually surprised that FDA and Pfizer/China allowed Novavax to get this close to approval, but they clearly have the upcoming vote RIGGED, just like the 2020 election. The trusty “board mules” that …

Well, it looks like the VRBPAC bunch did the smart – or at least consistent thing, and recommended approval.

LINKS HERE:

FDA advisers recommend authorization of Novavax’s Covid-19 vaccine

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/07/novavax-covid-vaccine-clears-key-step-on-path-to-fda-authorization-after-committee-endorses-the-shot.html

https://ir.novavax.com/2022-06-07-FDA-Advisory-Committee-Recommends-Emergency-Use-Authorization-of-Novavax-COVID-19-Vaccine-for-People-Aged-18-Years-and-Older

https://www.axios.com/2022/06/07/novavax-vaccine-fda-eua

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/fda-committee-proposes-eua-nod-to-novavaxs-nvax-covid-jab

https://www.thestreet.com/markets/novavax-stock-soars-as-fda-panel-recommends-eua-for-covid-vaccine

https://news.yahoo.com/fda-advisory-committee-recommends-novavax-vaccine-for-use-in-adults-194314939.html

The 21-0 vote with one abstention is telling, IMO. A vote AGAINST would cause an uproar on both sides, and put VRBPAC in the hot seat. Are they shuffling the murder of Novavax off to “the Roach” for a kill? We will see.

Here is a comment I added to my prior post, regarding an article in the Federalist, which takes the “no more approvals of any vaccine” approach – which I believe is well-intended but short-sighted. This comment explain my strategic reasons for supporting approval.

Here is a great example of somebody who sees the vaccines much the same as me, but strategically comes to the exact opposite point of view on approval of Novavax.

Reading his point of view may help people to see mine – or maybe not. Worth a read.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/06/09/fda-pushes-to-authorize-novavaxs-covid-19-vaccine-despite-serious-cardiovascular-safety-issues/

Dr. Gortler basically wants to begin playing fair and correctly on Novavax – making it jump through the hoops that Pfizer and Moderna didn’t have to jump through, but (IN MY OPINION, NOT HIS) thus denying what is likely a SAFER vaccine (in many respects – not all) to people who are going to take a vaccine, one way or another.

In my opinion, admitting the Novavax vaccine will shed necessary light on mRNA technology, as this “shingles-style” (recombinant protein) vaccine will help to highlight the flaws of the mRNA tech in the long run.

This is where I take a “Trumpian” and “they have to be shown” position. I regard a denial here as the kind of “purism” that has been deadly to conservatives, and was responsible for “NeverTrump” as an effective weapon of the left.

We have what is likely a “saf-ER” vaccine. Do we approve it or not?

YMMV.

Wolf Moon, June 9, 2022

Note that there is still plenty of time for FDA and/or CDC to snake Novavax and help Pfizer and China. Will they do it? Let’s wait and see. Either way, we win.

If Rochelle Alinsky and Anthony Fauci knife Novavax in the back to protect mRNA, I will have one of my greatest arguments yet that they need to be removed and prosecuted. The blatant hypocrisy will win more and more Democrats to our side. All of my neighbors are perfect recipients of the message. They will be screaming for Fauci to hang.

If they allow Novavax the opportunity to prove itself [to any degree] safer than mRNA vaccines, they fight another day – but they have to fight a battle we are destined to win.

Like I say, every day is a fight – but we are winning more and more fights, sooner and sooner.

FIGHT ON, PATRIOTS.

W

Dear KMAG: 20220307 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / The Truth Is Coming Out About COVID Deaths / The Decisive Battle / An Exemplary Peer Review

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

Hang in there, Trumpy Bear! You’re going back to the White House!!!

No more of this Sleepy Creepy guy, provoking needless wars to fill Democrat coffers!

The Business At Hand

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get THROUGH IT, OVER IT, and BEYOND IT.

The Rules

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.

The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

In an image…….

Try to make it real.

SO….. [ENGAGE BOILERPLATE…..]

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

Those who cannot deal with this easy requirement will be forced to jump the hoops of moderation, so that specific comments impugning other posters and violating the minimal rules can be sorted out and tossed in the trash.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

That includes the life skill of just ignoring certain other posters.

We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).

We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

You may also pray for our enemies, many of whom were grievously harmed by their foolish choice to virtue signal with the experimental gene therapy vaccines, which were snuck upon all of us by the monstrous WEF, Pfizer and Moderna, despite our warnings, and because this corrupt administration, media, and social media suppressed the truth.

MUSICAL INTERLUDE

For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.

First, some “epic” mandolin…..

Well, let’s get that mandoleen a little more TOE-TAPPIN’ and a FOOT STOMPIN’!

And finally, a song from a movie you probably never saw – Captain Corelli’s Mandolin.

OK – we can’t leave you with that downer. Check THIS happy song out!

Feel ready? GOOD!

Call To Battle

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

For the first time – no image here.

OK, just ONE of many:

I refer you to a series of ABSOLUTELY AWESOME memes posted by Robert Malone, here:

LINK: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/sunday-strip-887?utm_source=url&s=r

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

(Read down to the fine print.)

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.

Three Great Articles

These are three great pieces you really need to see.

FROM GAB

Robert Malone Spots COVID FRAUD ISSUE Getting Big Press

This is Political Moonshine being RIGHT, and now catching FIRE in the (almost) mainstream media after being vetted by journalists.

RW Malone MD
@RobertMaloneMD
·

The Truth Is Coming Out About COVID Deaths.

The Epoch Times. Updated: March 2, 2022

“Hospitals receive payments for testing every patient for COVID, every COVID diagnosis and every ‘COVID death,’ as well as any time they use remdesivir and mechanical ventilation.”

Not only is that a great article, that is highly referenced.. It very accurately goes through history and malfeasance by our government and the hospitals. This article is a must read. It also has an extensive list of references at the end.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/the-truth-is-coming-out-about-covid-deaths_4309806.html

The Truth Is Coming Out About COVID Deaths

Hospitals receive payments for testing every patient for COVID, every COVID diagnosis and every ‘COVID death,’ as well …

www.theepochtimes.com

View Link Feed

1,121 likes
68 comments
733 reposts
12 quotes

You may hit a paywall, but you can take Malone’s word for it, if you do.

H/T whoever it was who found this gem! (I forgot)

How “Let’s Go Brandon” Demonstrates the Failure of The Regime’s “Decisive Victory” Strategy Against Us

This may seem like it’s the usual, hand-waving, “defeat is victory” battered-conservative abuse-porn, coated with addictive hopium, but IMO it’s actually some “real” hopanite ore, suitable for creating hopium-based nukes, and depleted hopium bullets.

Basically, a comparison of the “establishment victory over Trump” to Pearl Harbor.

They have not won.

Rather, they have earned themselves an ASS-WHOOPIN’.

To be delivered when we are actually READY.

ENJOY.

The Decisive Battle

LINK: https://tinkzorg.wordpress.com/2021/11/02/2740/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.ph/Vc0XQ

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/02/28/2022.02.25.22271454.full.pdf

from the desk of Robert Malone

Robert Malone Performs/Explains A Real Live Peer Review

This is actually REALLY GREAT, and a UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY. You will almost NEVER see this, unless you get an advanced science degree, and in that case, you will likely be taught all the bad habits of somebody not nearly as good and experienced in “grantsmanship”, patenting, and publication, as is Robert W. Malone.

Malone even does it in plain, common, sensible language that anybody can understand. You will literally see how to “talk back” to HIGHLY credentialed scientists making mistakes, showing bias, sticking to narratives, and just being people who you should NOT trust.

This is RESTORATIVE to real science. I just cannot praise this enough.

Peer review example: “Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine among children”

Having written hundreds of requested peer reviews, I am offering my unsolicited one.

LINK: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/peer-review-example-effectiveness?s=r

What makes this even more powerful, is a slightly earlier post by Malone, in which he exhorts ALL people to USE COMMON SENSE in doubting the media on things in which they don’t have expertise, because the FAKE NEWS is demonstrably WRONG on the things in which you DO have expertise, and you REMEMBER those cases, and therefore you are absolutely entitled to extend that skepticism to ALL THINGS THE PRESS SAYS.

And that would include the SCIENCE PRESS.

Don’t be Brain Dead

In other words, think for yourself

LINK: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/dont-be-brain-dead?utm_source=url&s=r

The combination of these two articles is just DEADLY to scientific authoritarianism.

Malone is quickly turning into the Ben Franklin of this little revolution.

Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

rapprochement

noun

  1. A reestablishing of cordial relations, as between two countries.
  2. The state of reconciliation or of cordial relations.
  3. A coming or bringing together or into accord; establishment of harmonious relations; reconciliation.

pronunciation

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/pronunciation/english/rapprochement

(rä′prôsh-mäN′) (raprɔʃmɑ̃)  (ˌræp roʊʃˈmɑ̃)  (ræˈprɒʃmɑ̃ːŋ)

Please note that there are many variations on how English speakers actually pronounce most of the word, but the lifted pinky / beltway bandit / light-in-the-loafers silent T is “supposed to be” preserved in English, and the result sounds very French.

Therefore, if you want to stay grounded and keep your “man of the people” cover, you can intentionally mispronounce the word JUST A LITTLE by including that final ‘t’ ever so slightly (“MAUWNt”).

Alternatively, over-emphasize the open mouth ‘MAUW[n]’ at the end to almost comedic levels, and you sound like a real American who took French in high school. But it’s still probably best to avoid ‘reproach-ment’, unless you really want to make sure people think you don’t know a lick of French.

Used in a sentence:

The convergence was noted by statesmen and scholars of the time, but the term “Great Rapprochement” to refer to a distinct historical phenomenon may have been coined by the American historian of Anglo-American relations Bradford Perkins in his 1968 study of the period, The Great Rapprochement: England and the United States 1895–1914.

Slightly misused (and optionally mispronounced) in a Lindsey Graham joke:

“He was above rapprochement.”

ENJOY THE SHOW

Have another great week!

W

DEAR KAG: 20220225 – The Pub is OPEN / COVID-19 Vaccine Interference With AIDS and Syphilis Tests / Moscow Mule Revisited / Failure of Socialized Science and Peer Review Exposed in a JAMA-Published Ivermectin Study

The Pub is OPEN!

And we’re finally serving a NORMAL DRINK tonight. Even though it’s a SECOND ROUND.

STAY TUNED…..

While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.

and what time of year is it now???

Christmas Spirit

We continue our WAAAAAY too-long celebration of Christmas by noting that some of our neighbors STILL have their lights and decorations up.

We saw a nice red Christmas bow laying in somebody’s yard by their driveway.

We ourselves just got rid of our tree.

And TODAY is the 25th of the month. That’s VERY “Christmassy”.

So yeah. Given that there are a few days weeks months AFTER Christmas where it’s STILL Christmas, that means we have a few more weeks left. Riiiiiiight?

Sure! So have some hot CHRISTMAS chocolate!

And now, the rules of the pub.

HOUSE RULES

God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.

Now, back to business.

AMEN!

Free the January Brothers!

Current Art On The Wall

We’re just gonna segue into the next item with our selection, if that’s OK.

This gets a bit “planetary”…..

Venus and Mercury Instructing Cupid
Christiaan Huygens, Saturn, and Something
Raindrops on Titan
https://owlcation.com/stem/Huygens-Mission-on-Titan
LINK: https://www.instagram.com/p/BAOVsasAXhl/
Mercury, the old cure for grandgore.

COVID-19 Vaccine Interference With AIDS and Syphilis Tests

Earlier this week, RAC brought a news item from CTH, which really got me thinking:

FDA Warns of Vaccine Induced Positive Syphilis Test

This had to do with a CDC alert…..

LINK: https://www.cdc.gov/std/FDA-alert-12-20-2021.pdf

…..which was based off of an FDA alert (sketchy link)…..

…..which actually links back to a different CDC alert (even sketchier link)…..

WHATEVER.

Here is that final CDC alert. Only the top 3 paragraphs are important here.

Let me quote the text of those first 3 paragraphs for Zoe. I will make BOLD what is important.

Dear Partners in Prevention,

December 20, 2021

I’m writing to share the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) alert sent to clinical laboratory staff and health care providers about a syphilis test. The alert reports that false reactivity, or “false-positive,” Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR; non-treponemal) test results, when using the Bio-Rad Laboratories BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR kit, can occur in some people who received a COVID-19 vaccine and includes recommendations for addressing these potential false positives.

Historically, false-reactive RPR test results have been observed in people with systemic infections unrelated to syphilis, such as tuberculosis, rickettsial diseases, and endocarditis. False-reactive RPR testing also has been previously observed following immunization (specifically following smallpox vaccine). False reactivity with RPR can also occur during pregnancy.

Per CDC’s 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines, reactive RPR results should always be confirmed with treponemal testing (e.g., Treponema pallidum particle agglutination, TP-PA). This is, in part, because of the above-mentioned issue: false-positive nontreponemal test results can be associated with multiple medical conditions and factors unrelated to syphilis. According to FDA’s alert, treponemal testing for syphilis does not appear to be impacted by this issue.

Allow me to translate.

It turns out that “being vaccinated for COVID-19” throws off an ANTIBODY-BASED SYPHILIS TEST, and can give false positives.

The reason is that these are a sort of antibodies against substances released from cells attacked by certain diseases and conditions. Thus, they’re not exclusively the downstream product of syphilis.

Normally, certain diseases, certain vaccines, and pregnancy can all throw off this more rapid but less conclusive syphilis test, and that is part of the reason why people are supposed to follow up this easier test, with a test that looks for the actual organism which causes syphilis.

Thus, we have added one more cause for the test to be thrown off.

This is not the same as the HIV test that was thrown off by a particular Australian vaccine, because the antigen in the vaccine actually contained an HIV protein (gp41) as part of the vaccine, and created antibodies against HIV. I talked about that last week. That was a much more direct test interference, easily expected.

Saved From The Frankenvax

How a Psycho Vaccine Marrying the Infamous COVID Spike Protein to HIV’s Neurotoxic gp41 Was [Allegedly] Canned by a Mere Testing SNAFU How Australia Dodged The First Mad Vax Bullet of the WEF Scamdemic / Plannedemic Darwin Award Vaccine Featured Insane Merger of HIV and COVID But Failed Due to Buggering of AIDS Tests, NOT …

What I find interesting is that one of the things that normally sets off the syphilis test is endocarditis.

Endocarditis, which is inflammation of the inner surfaces of the heart, is one of the three main heart inflammations, thus being pretty damned close to myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the outer sac), both of which have very prominent correlations to the jabs.

So while this means that – NO – the shots are not giving people syphilis – the shots ARE basically acting like an illness, and very much like a known cardiac illness.

You were warned.

Now – while I was researching syphilis, I became interested in the treatment with compounds of mercury.

Traditional mercury-based pastes were used in cures. Whilst this was partially effective, the toxic side effects of the mercury probably outweighed any advantages.

This is actually a HUGE understatement.

It turned out that arsenic was considerably better.

The first effective treatment for syphilis was arsphenamine, discovered by Sahachiro Hata in 1909, during a survey of hundreds of newly synthesized organic arsenical compounds led by Paul Ehrlich. It was manufactured and marketed from 1910 under the trade name Salvarsan by Hoechst AG.[88] This organoarsenic compound was the first modern chemotherapeutic agent.

It wasn’t too long after that success, that penicillin took over as the real cure for syphilis.

I will come back to MERCURY in a future post, because I found something quite amazing in its history.

But if you look ONE COLUMN TO THE LEFT and TWO ROWS UP…..

COPPER is also bacteriostatic and algicidal – and at concentrations below where it is a health risk. And THAT leads back to a DRINK that Grandmaintexas introduced us to……

Moscow Mule Revisited

Based upon my reading of Grandma’s post on the subject, the Moscow Mule simply is not a proper Moscow Mule unless it is served in copper vessels.

The health effects of COPPER are about as debatable as the effects of mercury – although, in general, copper is much less toxic, so when it’s being “not good for you”, it’s a lot less “not good for you” than lead. At the same time, copper is much MORE toxic to things like algae, fungi, plant roots, and other “pests”, than it is to us, and that is why it is found among the gardening pesticides in hardware stores. The antimicrobial activity of copper is extremely well-documented, but appears to be complex. Simply having copper in the household or workplace environment seems to have health benefits – and this was particularly noted back in the days of less sanitary environments. Water passing through copper fixtures tended not to spread disease.

We tend to forget about OLD SCIENCE, so we can’t put new things into good perspective.

LEAD and other CHEMICAL ADVANCES saved us from the horrible BIOLOGICAL diseases and maladies of the uncivilized life.

Did they have chemical consequences? Yes. The TRICK is REMEMBERING AND ADMITTING OLD RISKS AND BENEFITS while also DISCOVERING AND ADMITTING NEW RISKS AND BENEFITS, then BALANCING HONESTLY with the PROPER PRIORITIES which put PEOPLE FIRST.

It is VERY easy to see where CDC went off the rails with the COVID-19 vaccines, being unable to admit old benefits (of lasting immunity to caught and treated diseases), while also being unable to admit new risks (of vaccines using untested and immature technologies).

Likewise, looking back, it is easy to see that basic sanitation – not vaccination – REALLY conquered diseases. Vaccines came in, mopped up, and took all the credit, by design, because bad people realized that vaccines in the hands of a technological elite, combined with an ignorant populace they can essentially murder and experiment on at will, allow them to basically FARM HUMANITY.

Sorry, Bill Gates. We understand your social engineering of us. We know your M.O. We know your real intentions. Including for the “people of color” you pretend to care about.

You will note that, in general, the further down the periodic table one goes, the more toxic the metals. Surprisingly, the second-lightest one – beryllium – is quite toxic, but even lightweight aluminum simply isn’t all that bad, in the big picture (but you’ve got to keep it on the OUTSIDE). In contrast, if you get down and heavy there with mercury, thallium and lead, or even as far down the table as cadmium and indium, the metals can be quite toxic.

Lead used to be used for plumbing – enough to lend its name to the profession. Copper then took over – before plastic began to displace copper. Nevertheless, copper is still highly valued for plumbing, as well as for electrical wiring.

As noted above, copper in drinking water is an interesting beast. Lead and copper in drinking water are controlled by the EPA under something called the Lead and Copper Rule, or LCR. Note that the linked document, which talks about the most recent “upgrade” to the rule, is over 400 pages. Yeah – there is a MESS of goofiness outside the actual rule there. Most of the concern is about lead, which is now highly restricted. Here is all that is said about copper’s toxicity in the linked explainer:

Acute copper exposure causes gastrointestinal distress. Chronic exposure to copper is particularly a concern for people with Wilson’s disease because they are prone to copper accumulation in body tissue, which can lead to liver damage, neurological, and/or psychiatric symptoms. For a more detailed explanation of the health effects associated with copper see Appendix E of the final rule Economic Analysis (USEPA, 2020). EPA did not propose revisions to the copper requirements; thus, the final rule does not revise the copper requirements.

Copper is basically off the hook at 1.3 ppm or below. That number has not been upgraded. Why is that level important? In my opinion, it’s because copper is bacteriostatic and algicidal in practice at between 0.1 and 1.0 ppm. Thus, one can SAFELY DRINK water which is being purified against microorganisms with copper.

And THAT would include the Moscow Mule, depending upon how long it sits.

I refer you now to an excellent article, which relies on a breathless scaremongering headline, but actually DOES provide a balanced set of viewpoints on both the DANGERS and BENEFITS of dietary copper.

Sipping This Popular Cocktail Is a “Health Hazard,” Experts Say

AFTER 27 MINUTES, YOU MAY BE AT RISK OF HEAVY METAL POISONING.

LINK: https://bestlifeonline.com/moscow-mule-copper-news/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/6YT3X

First of all, copper isn’t really a “heavy metal” IMO, but whatever. It’s heavier than some.

You will note, after reading at the link, that you have to drink a ton of Moscow Mules, or a few that have sat around for a very long time, to MAYBE get sickened by them.

In general, avoid drinking acidic things that have been in contact with copper for a long time, and you will be OK.

Remember – most household water has sat around in copper pipes for quite a while at neutral pH, and it’s simply not toxic (due to copper). You DO get less lead if you flush your water 30 seconds before getting drinking water, but again – we’re talking about levels that would make Romans, Victorians, and even people from 70 years ago howl with laughter at our prissy over-concern – even knowing the science.

Perspective is very important – as you are about to see in a beautiful example of the failure of modern science, thanks to CCP socialism infecting both global science and science publishing.

Failure of Socialized Science and Peer Review Exposed in a JAMA-Published Ivermectin Study

The fact that Pierre Kory now calls JAMA “PHAMA” is a nice short way of saying that medicine has been utterly taken over by the pharmaceutical industry, and IMO set back several thousand years. Hippocrates would be HORRIFIED by what has happened to medicine – and I say that as somebody OUTSIDE medicine, and a lot closer to the pharmaceutical industry.

IMO it’s too late to save the pharmaceutical industry from scandalous criminal survival – but it’s not too late to save the profession of medicine from utter moral death. And thus, you will be treated to my following scientific opinion.

Steve Kirsch doesn’t play defense. He saw how JAMA (the Journal of the American Medical Association) completely FUMBLED an ivermectin paper, and how Pierre Kory picked it up off the ground, taking complete control, but more or less just standing there, lamenting the bad refs and horrible cheating. So Kirsch did the only thing he does. He grabbed the ball from Kory and ran it back for a touchdown.

“New JAMA paper show Ivermectin blows the COVID vaccines out of the water”

This is an utter reversal of the conclusion of the paper.

All because some guy in the stands named “Massimaux” spotted the free ball and yelled “FUMBLE!!!”

If you understand science, and science publishing, then you will see that what Kirsch did here was BRUTAL. And I’m gonna show you where all the bruises and black eyes are.

I almost feel sorry for JAMA, but not enough to miss this opportunity to LEAP ONTO THE DOGPILE and give AMA’s hare-brained PC leadership a good WEDGIE.

Don’t worry about the AMA. They’re protected by Pfizer, Biden, and the media. And just like any good mafia arrangement, as long as AMA keeps saying the right things, and not saying the wrong things, everything is gonna be OK.

Everything but science. But that’s OK, too.

We’ll take care of things. Just like we did here.

Here is the Kirsch gab that grabbed my attention.

Repeating for Zoe, as well as our silicon friends…..

Steve Kirsch
@stkirsch
·

New JAMA paper show Ivermectin blows the COVID vaccines out of the water 

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-jama-paper-show-ivermectin-blows?r=o7iqo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

New JAMA paper show Ivermectin blows the COVID vaccines out of the water

Whoops! How embarrassing! The CDC gave you bad advice. If you want to survive COVID, you should use the drug they said to avoid, and avoid the drug they said to…

stevekirsch.substack.com

View Link Feed

2,589 likes
208 comments
1,670 reposts
42 quotes

Now, as soon as I saw this, I was going….

“Wait a second. I thought there was some paper just out that Alex Berenson said was basically the end of ivermectin, although scientifically, I know that’s pretty much impossible. I know there is SOME explanation for why this paper (which I have not read yet) has to be deviating in some way from the MANY papers that show limited but solid efficacy – and especially against DEATH – just like HCQ. But this CANNOT be the same paper. No way! Kirsch would not be saying this unless the results were stunningly IN FAVOR of ivermectin, and there is no WAY that some authors with a NEGATIVE-LEANING study would be……. I mean….. WHAT THE HELL????”

SO – I just stopped to see what in the hell paper Kirsch was talking about.

YUP.

This is the SAME PAPER.

ARTICLE: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2789362

SUPPLEMENTARY: https://cdn.jamanetwork.com/ama/content_public/journal/intemed/0/ioi220006supp2_prod_1644957301.65433.pdf

This is the SAME PAPER that caused Alex Berenson to issue TWO articles:

Ivermectin fails

To the ivermectin fanatics

Now we’ve discussed (in the comments on this site) Berenson’s very weird attack on Robert Malone when they appeared together on Fox News, which didn’t make sense THEN, but which does NOW – and I will explain that momentarily. But first, back to Kirsch.

Kirsch explains that – YES – this paper states in BOTH its abstract and its conclusion the following:

“The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.”

However, that is NOT what the data says.

Certainly not to everybody.

Certainly not to me.

In other words, DIFFERENT scientists (like Kirsch, Kory, me, and an anonymous Twitter poster names Massimaux, who found the key issue) have looked at the data, and see something quite different.

Kory goes into a rather long analysis of the whole war against ivermectin, but Kirsch digs into Kory’s article and then finds and elucidates the key nugget – discovered by Massimaux – that just ends the arguments.

It helps to read this in Kirsch’s article, but if you’re going to be lazy, I’ll explain here.

Here is Massimaux’s tweet:

Look at the bottom line in the two tables and compare. Not only is ivermectin CLEARLY better than the vaccine at preventing death – the significance of the result is significantly greater.

If the efficacy of ivermectin against death is not true, then very little else in the study is true.

This data says that ivermectin is exactly what we’ve been saying it is. It’s not a miracle cure, but it WORKS – particularly in preventing DEATH – its only real purpose. That result is IN THE PAPER. It is IN THE DATA. And if the authors want to argue that it’s not in the data, because it’s not significant enough, then nothing ELSE is in the data, because most everything else is even LESS significant.

Now it’s very important to realize that this nice little pair of tables FROM THE DATA is not due to the original authors – it’s due to a POST-PUBLICATION “peer review” by somebody who looked at the very same data, and PROVED using the authors’ own data that they were WRONG to say that the data didn’t support use of ivermectin.

So why did the authors tack on that wrong statement?

Did the EDITORS make them tack on that statement?
Did the AUTHORS tack it on to get the paper to publish?
Or is the “peer bias” against ivermectin, mostly due to the media, SO STRONG that scientists didn’t even look through their own data to see a conclusion they didn’t want to see?

Or is it a combination of ALL of these?

It is clearly in the data that ivermectin is three times as effective as the vaccines in preventing death. Even more importantly, if you add in what is known OUTSIDE the paper in question – namely the adverse effects of the vaccine and the safety of ivermectin, then it’s a no-brainer to NOT take the vaccine and to just use ivermectin. And Kirsch explains THAT rather nicely.

The data LITERALLY justify our position.

This was my hunch all along, and as vaccine side effects loomed larger and larger, and ivermectin proved to be rather shockingly harmless, even at antiviral doses comparable to large-animal systemic antiparasitic doses. All ivermectin had to do was prevent death to some moderate extent, and it was a no-brainer that people should take it.

To conclude anything else, based on the data, is murderous folly, in my opinion.

When I was a young lad – a mere student – but also one who WROTE PAPERS (because I had a great professor who TRAINED US to be full-blooded scientists), we EXPECTED to be CRITICIZED in peer review by people exactly like Steve Kirsch, Pierre Kory, and myself. We expected that others would look at data and see it completely differently.

And we would then have to ACKNOWLEDGE the alternative interpretations, or convince the editors that the criticism was not even worth acknowledging (a VERY rare occurrence in any legitimately contested field).

My lab had PRACTICE criticizing other people’s work – and we expected it in return. I personally found quite a few errors in the literature. Most were small – mostly problems of the writing – but some were huge and affected the science. Sometimes the big errors would only partially alter the author’s conclusions, but other times they had a significant impact.

However, I have to admit that I never ran into data which PROVED THE OPPOSITE of the authors’ main conclusion – even if only to the critic – and THAT is what we have here.

PEER REVIEW is designed to subject a paper to (hopefully at least TWO) critical readers who will very likely DEMAND improvements. Those improvements often mean acknowledging DIFFERENT views of the data as being possible and maybe even reasonable.

That kind of QUALITY peer review was VERY OBVIOUSLY not done here.

What we have RIGHT HERE is a demonstration that HERD REVIEW is much more important than PEER REVIEW.

PEER REVIEW is subject to BIAS. It is subject to SUBVERSION and GAMING.

I go back to the Zhang mask paper, for crying out loud.

To me, this will always remain a horrifying example of “fitting the data to the theory”, rather than looking to see what the data says. You can just look at this graph and see the crime.

I lay this stuff SQUARELY at the feet of SOCIALISM, which has politicized science and removed control of science from the people of science themselves, investing much of it in a media which WILL NOT question government narratives. People raised under socialism who become “go-alongers” – and so SOME degree that is everybody – stop questioning things that need to be questioned.

I have WATCHED and I have SEEN how WEF and CCP corruption have degraded science everywhere.

They’re not going to fix this stuff – at least not yet.

But until then, know this:

Ivermectin WORKS, and it was just proven by people who said it doesn’t work.

Thanks to HERD REVIEW.

One last point.

Why did Alex Berenson not see this?

IMO, it’s because Berenson is simply not a scientist – he’s an investigative journalist. Thus, his virtue-signaling attack on Malone was meant to show “journalistic balance”, NOT that he himself had deeply researched the history of the topic, in which case he (Berenson) would have likely said “Yes, Malone really is the most foundational of the founding fathers of the tech.”

But let’s not blame Alex too hard. THE AUTHORS OF THIS STUDY – that’s right – the authors themselves – didn’t see it, either.

See what I’ve always said? Real science is contentious.

But it has a good heart.

It wants the TRUTH.

ENJOY THE SHOW.

Thank you all for being here. Have a great weekend.

W

Dear KMAG: 20220221 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Washington’s Birthday / Two Weeks To Flatten The Tyrants

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

Get your rest, Trumpy Bear! You’re going back to the White House!!!

We have to RESCUE it from THE SNIFFER OF KIDS!

The Business At Hand

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL NOT let that keep us down!

The Rules

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.

The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

Because without Free Speech, we’re little more than SLEEPY THE KID-SNIFFER’S banana republic of SOUTH CANUCKISTAN.

SO….. [ENGAGE BOILERPLATE…..]

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

Those who cannot deal with this easy requirement will be forced to jump the hoops of moderation, so that specific comments impugning other posters and violating the minimal rules can be sorted out and tossed in the trash.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

That includes the life skill of just ignoring certain other posters.

We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).

We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”

A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

You may pray for Justice as well, because TRUTH, JUSTICE, and THE AMERICAN WAY are all worth the prayers!

MUSICAL INTERLUDE

For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.

This one MAY have been posted by Wheatie back in the day.

Check out the date. Then be sure to check out the end credits.

Two Steps From Hell – Freedom Fighters (Extended)

3,042,815 views Jan 6, 2014

WE SEE YOU, PELOSI!

We remember what you did to us!

Call To Battle

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/02/18/state-lawmakers-are-waking-up-to-blackrocks-dangers-to-americans-and-taking-action/

Hat tip to whoever brought this! Full image below the tweet.

“When the Canadian dollar becomes worthless, we will be here to serve you, too.”

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.

Washington’s Birthday

George Washington was a mensch.

He was WAY more of a mensch than, for example, pick-a-POC lady RINOs pushed by the Bush Nazis, sucking up to the central banks and WEF Nazis, letting THEM decide which American statues need to be taken down.

How about NONE?

Is George Washington relevant now?

Hell, yes, you communist and Nazi scum, occupying OUR CAPITOL.

WE SEE YOU! WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE! WE KNOW WHERE YOU HATCH YOUR PLOTS!

We know who your masters, propagandists, and DEMON bureaucrats are!

WE KNOW YOUR PLANS!

WE KNOW WHO YOUR AGENTS AND ASSETS ARE!

YOU betrayed the key principles of the founding of this country, and you WILL abandon your evil plans, or you will PAY for not having done so.

This country was founded on TRUTH, FREEDOM, and JUSTICE – and we will have them ALL BACK, SO HELP US GOD!

Two Weeks To Flatten The Tyrants

TL;DR – When and How We Go On Strike Matters – YUGELY.

By now, you are certainly aware of the proposed idea of a GENERAL STRIKE – largely by truckers, but with the support of the people – to CRASH both the Trudeau dictatorship and the Biden regime.

As well as many other complicit and dictatorial “democratic” governments.

Scott and Aubergine have been the biggest proponents of that idea on this site, and I keep gravitating back to it. It just makes sense.

While some think that as little as 3 days would be enough to crash a city like New York – because that’s all the supplies they have on hand – others think longer. I even picked two weeks, which – just like nuking from orbit – might be the only way to be sure.

Two Weeks To Flatten The Tyrants

The thing is, I had an interesting dream about this, in which I honestly examined many of the “logistical” problems, and by the time I woke up, I realized that there are many ways in which a poorly executed and/or poorly timed general strike serve THEIR interests more than ours.

In fact, I believe that a badly timed general strike is actually a TRAP, going back to the Bolshevik takeover of Russia, and particularly the Holodomor – where the people with the food were STARVED, in a typically evil reversal that communists and Nazis seem to create so easily.

Not only is it possible for us to USE UP our preparations and supplies needlessly – before the REAL BATTLE begins – we may give THEM what they need to pull off ANOTHER January Sixth-type propaganda event.

TIMING IS EVERYTHING.

Thus, I’m not opposed to the idea of a general strike at all, but I think that timing is critical.

Go BEYOND the very real questions of percentage of participating truckers and citizens.

Go BEYOND the very real questions of THEIR ability to thwart or work around our tactics, if we move forward at a time of THEIR choosing.

What’s happening right now?

SECURITY RINOs are running against FREEDOM Patriots in upcoming primaries.

Sure, it’s election time, and we’re hearing plenty of sweet-talk by the suitors.

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine is even trying a DIRECT STROKE OF TRUMP’S BUSINESS JONES, bringing chip-maker Intel to Ohio, right into Wexner’s back yard.

Gotta say, that IS standing up to China, in many but not all ways (there are plenty of Chi-spies in Ohio, just waiting to become plants in those plants), but as far as standing up to DEMOCRATS fronting for China and WEF, DeWine has chosen poorly despite numerous warnings.

Mask mandates are destroying small businesses, while DeWine courts the BIG WOKE corporations that front all the leftist corporatist CRAP upon us, and which enrich themselves by pandemic theater, security theater, and even WAR theater.

We will be able to take DOWN these Bidenista and Bidenazi tyrants. But any distraction away from voting NOW for FREEDOM is going to hurt us TENFOLD down the line.

How did we get Virginia back?

https://richmond.com/photos-youngkin-signs-bill-to-remove-mask-mandates-in-public-schools-k-12/collection_83123807-d927-5aa6-a405-e392970bf4e3.html#2

We did the RIGHT THING. And we did it at the RIGHT TIME.

We participated STRONGLY in the electoral process and CHASED OUT THE COMMUNISTS.

In my opinion, the Democrats are not dropping mask mandates for NOVEMBER.

They are dropping mandates to PROTECT their precious, treasonous RINOs – who can be voted out IN MARCH, APRIL, MAY and JUNE.

If WE push the wrong kind of “disorder” before the election, and the media frames it properly, then SECURITY RINOS ARE SAVED.

So – should we have a strike now?

I honestly don’t know. But I think we need to be VERY, VERY CAREFUL.

We need to keep our EYE ON THE PRIZE.

FREEDOM. ONCE AGAIN. FOR ALL. By being SMART.

Ain’t that right, Cinderella?

Free those kids, my man!

There WILL be a right time for “two weeks to flatten the tyrants”, and it will be at a time of GOD’S CHOOSING. It could be NOW. It could be LATER. By diligent prayer and honest discussion, we will know when that moment arrives. Please think about it now, and prepare for that moment, so that when the time comes, we are ready and able to STRIKE HARD to WIN.

But let us NOT be fooled again.

Because I know PERSONALLY how SNEAKY and WICKED the other side is.

Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

hypostrophe

noun

return to primary argument after digression

  1. (medicine) The act of a patient turning himself or herself.
  2. (medicine) A relapse, or return of a disease.
  3. (rhetoric) The use of insertion or parenthesis.

This word is largely in disuse, but leads to all kinds of interesting divergence in words containing the “strophe” root, such as apostrophe, catastrophe, anastrophe, epistrophe, antistrophe, etc.

Used in a sentence:

The word ‘hypostrophe’, meaning the relapse of an illness, is an old medical term likely to be encountered by genealogists.

Used satirically in a sentence:

Called the ‘hypostrophe’, the symbol overrides all known grammatical laws, meaning that it can never be used in the wrong place.

Used in polycyclic aliphatic hydrocarbon nomenclature:

hypostrophene

  • synthetic hydrocarbon
  • undergoes a theoretically interesting rearrangement back to itself
  • does not yield the arguably more interesting pentaprismane as hoped
  • illustrates dry science humor allowed to authors in novel names
https://www.slideshare.net/anthonycrasto64/the-magic-of-cubane

ENJOY THE SHOW

Have another great week!

W

And speaking of “bad girls” from Death on the Nile (2022)…..

…..I found this unofficial dance scene clip, which so far has not been scrubbed from YouTube!

WARNING – possibly NSFW.

FULL VIDEO

Who Approved and Upheld These Vaccines? The Covid Second Opinion Forum Held by Ron Johnson vs. the FDA Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC)

A background research post by Gail Combs

PREFACE

by Wolf Moon

It is useful for me to explain Gail’s post – to help you understand the importance of it.

People in government regulation of science and medicine do not make decisions in a vacuum – but they may make their decisions in an artificial atmosphere which is created, composed, and altered by those with the extreme power and ability to CONTROL INFORMATION.

LancetGate was very demonstrative of this ability to control science and medicine.

After watching a variety of FDA decisions under the Trump and Biden administrations, it has become very clear to me that FDA resides in a political and economic crosswinds, highly influenced by many parties with strong expectations and abilities to influence. And yet, the shocking (but welcome) advisory recommendation AGAINST COVID vaccine boosters – then overridden by the political operative Rochelle Alinsky Walensky in CDC – shows how a coordinated injection of honest medicine and common sense into FDA decision-making (THANK YOU, Steve Kirsch!) can sometimes make its case heard – even if only momentarily.

Sadly, it seems to me that Pfizer is back in the driver’s seat again. We thus have to ask WHY.

What Gail has done is to look at one endpoint of the argument (frontline doctors and publishing scientists who have run into the problems), which leads to the other, where we begin to find the reasons why FDA generally decides things in favor of big industry and big government, and not to the benefit of individual patients and doctors.

By looking at the doctors and scientists who supported logical and ethical TREATMENT of COVID-19, and who were wrongly and unethically BLOCKED and DENIED PERMISSION at every point – we can see that undue industry and political influence in NIH, CDC, and FDA are most likely responsible for decisions that make absolutely no sense to truly independent scientists and doctors. The video Gail includes is rather astounding in terms of showing us how much went wrong. What we are now seeing reminds me of science and medicine in the Soviet Union. Absolutely incredible.

What Gail has done here is to “follow the influence” – to show that FDA decision-making has NOT been in a vacuum, precisely because the members of the FDA advisory committee are not truly independent, but are in fact actors for the very same powerful forces that benefit from FDA decisions which are now inscrutable at the doctor-patient frontline.

Perhaps even more astoundingly, the very SYSTEM of NIH, FDA, and CDC seems to be designed, at this point, to leave NOBODY ACCOUNTABLE. Advisory groups and even department responsibilities are created, rearranged, and dismissed, so that NOBODY takes responsibility for mandates that defy logic and even violate the common medical sense of the past.

If something goes wrong in this chaotic system of responsibilities in the wrong places, you either blame everybody or nobody at all. This is why, in my opinion, the entire federal governent had to get rid of Trump.

DIG ALONG WITH GAIL, as she finds the CLUES – first in the testimony of Ron Johnson’s witnesses – then in the backgrounds of members of an important FDA advisory panel.

With that, here’s Gail.

The Covid Second Opinion Forum

It would be nice to let Senator Johnson know we saw this:

CONTACT: https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/contact

Offices – Mail address and Phone: https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/office_locations

MANY THANKS TO GA/FL and Wolf M00n for alerting us to the Covid 2nd opinion Forum

Here’s a must watch – A SECOND OPINION – SENATOR RON JOHNSON FORUM.
Begins at 40:19 – https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html
“Discussion begins around 40 minute mark. Sen. Ron Johnson moderates a panel discussion, COVID-19: A Second Opinion. A group of world renowned doctors and medical experts provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.”
More at https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov

GA/FL

It is five hours long and I went through the whole video. I recommend listening to it as you work on other things since there is not much to watch. It is much better than the speeches at the March Against Mandates.

My, comments posted 1/25/2020:
1:41:50 – 1:50:00 Dr Paul Marik on Remdesivir:
4 million hospitalized 850,000 million died. He says cheap approved drugs could have save 500,000 lives (That is the 1/2 million again that I figured out by a different method.)
He eviscerated NIH/FAUCI.

Fauci Told POTUS Remdesivir was good 10 days in. Researchers Changed the study END POINT to HIDE DEATHS. The OTHER study SHOWING the deaths/toxicity of Remdesivir in Ebola trial was released at 11:00 am JUST before the Afternoon presentation of the corrupted Remdesivir-Covid study that was presented by Fauci to POTUS. (More on this below) He also mentioned U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services gives bonuses to hospital to treat MEDICARE (the old and ‘useless’) patients with this toxic drug.

Steve Kirsch made it clear he thought it was corruption and worse several times.

Incriminating evidence – Steve Kirsch’s newsletter
New VAERS analysis reveals hundreds of serious adverse Events that the CDC and EDA Never Told Us About

3:12:00 MyFreeDoctor (dot)com:
This group treated 150,000 and only lost four.

3:35:00 Dr Peter McCollough talks about vaccines:
Originally there were three different advisory boards during the trials but when it came to the EUA those boards were gotten rid of AND THAT IS WHY CLOT SHOT WAS NOT PULLED IN JANUARY 2021!
Steven Kirsch says right after that there is HARD evidence at least 4 in the CDC/FDA were getting royalties…

4:02:00
The risk increases with each shot. mRna was ENGINEERED to TAMP DOWN RESPONSE to evade ADE BUT it looks like it ALSO tamps down response to viruses, bacteria, and cancer.
New Study Dr Voss out of the Netherlands.
There are too many Dr Voss in the netherlands for me to hunt down the correct one.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=voss%20netherlands&sort=date
(Could be KL Koss since she has papers about the heart and colon and cancer. papers: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Koss+KL&cauthor_id=8943944

4:43:00 Attorney Tom Renz:

He has Dept of Defense Whistleblowers with the data from the D-Med data base. They have taken data ‘snapshots’ over time and it shows THE DATA BASE WAS TAMPERED WITH TO HIDE THE INJURIES TO OUR SOLDIERS!
Senator Johnson Ordered PRESERVE YOUR RECORDS….

January 25, 2022 14:52
Apparently Daniel Horowitz chased down Attorney after the Ron Johonson Senate Hearing for some additional clarifications.
https://thelibertydaily.com/bombshell-cover-up-cancer-diagnoses-in-the-military-rose-over-three-fold-since-jabs-were-introduced/

para59r

5:05:00
Myocarditis and heart Hits 18 to 24 yr old males the worst. up to 50 years 21,000 cases so far.
A lot more good info.

Dr. Christina Parks made comments through out the presentation.

January 25, 2022 20:09
Yes – Dr. Christina Parks has made some excellent points about how differently people with African genetic background react to CV19 AND THE VACCINES.
Ethnicity does matter in medicine – my sister had concurrent dengue fever and malaria and her response was severe and peculiar to a certain ethnicity so….we learned may have some middle eastern/african blood somewhere previously unknown to us.

GA/FL

The Timeline of FDA Decisions

Heading down the Rabbit Hole on Vaccines that Dr Peter McCollough opened.

Emergency Use Authorization — FDA
As background, this gives the laws, who has the authority and the timeline.

TIME LINE:

October 13, 1976 – New York Times:
Swine Flu Program Is Halted in 9 States As 3 Die After Shots
“After the deaths, swine flu vaccinations were halted throughout Allegheny County, which includes Pittsburgh, and the Federal Center for Disease Control sent doctors to investigate….“


September 1, 2020 CNN
Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a Covid-19 vaccine now would be ‘colossally stupid’
This is actually a very good article on BAD vaccines and what it can do to the public’s trust.

And then we come to the FDA, the meetings and WHO is on the board.

October 22, 2020
Discussing, in general, the development, authorization and/or licensure of vaccines to prevent COVID-19


 On October 22, 2020, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s (CBER), Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) will meet in open session, to discuss, in general, the development, authorization and/or licensure of vaccines to prevent COVID-19. 

FDA

Those are probably the three boards Dr Peter McCollough talks about. The third was the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee that hold these meetings. Note they are meeting just before the election and it contains ALL three boards.
….

These meetings are AFTER the STOLEN ELECTION but again all three advisory boards are present.

December 10, 2020
Discussing First Emergency Use Authorization Request for a COVID-19 Vaccine


On December 10, 2020, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s (CBER), Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) will meet in open session to discuss Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age and older.

FDA

December 17,2020

Discussing Second Emergency Use Authorization Request for a COVID-19 Vaccine


Agenda
The meeting presentations will be heard, viewed, captioned, and recorded through an online teleconferencing platform. On December 17, 2020, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s (CBER), Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) will meet in open session to discuss Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Moderna, Inc., COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 18 years and older.

FDA

December 15, 2020 updated December 18


The ACIP met last week to review the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and recommended moving forward with its distribution to anyone over age 16. The FDA issued an EUA on Saturday following the meeting and notified the CDC and Operation Warp Speed to coordinate distribution plans. Initial doses were shipped over the weekend. The first round of deliveries will be completed in all 50 states this week…
Pfizer’s initial distribution of vaccines will be given to 21 million health care workers and 3 million mostly elderly people living in long-term care facilities.
As vaccines are deployed, data on potential or delayed side effects will be collected to answer questions that would have been addressed in long-term trials with millions of participants under nonemergency circumstances….

Nat’l Conf. of State Legislators

December 14, 2020, 8:33 PM – Black nurse in New York, Sandra Lindsay, gets the first vaccine.


A month later we get the first Adverse Reaction Reports.
January 18, 2021 – Coronavirus: California calls for pause, investigation after Allergic Reactions to Moderna Vaccine


Biden is installed in the White House and the FDA/CDC does no real investigation. Instead NOTE THE CHANGE IN MEETING MINUTES.


February 26, 2021
Discussing Third Emergency Use Authorization Request for a COVID-19 Vaccine


Agenda
The meeting presentations will be heard, viewed, captioned, and recorded through an online teleconferencing platform. The committee will meet in open session to discuss EUA of the Janssen Biotech Inc. COVID-19 Vaccine for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 18 years and older. <== NO ADDITIONAL ADVISORY BOARDS!
Meeting Materials
FDA intends to make background material available to the public no later than 2 business days before the meeting. <== THIS IS THE INFORMATION people are having to SUE FOR!

FDA

Note there are NO MEETINGS TO DISCUSS DEATHS OR ADVERSE REACTIONS! This is the NEXT MEETING:

June 10, 2021

Discussing Pediatric Use of COVID-19 Vaccines

The Committee will meet in open session to discuss, in general, data needed to support authorization and/or licensure of COVID-19 vaccines for use in pediatric populations.

Meeting Materials
FDA intends to make background material available to the public no later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post the background material on its website prior to the meeting….

FDA

Now we come to the meat, exactly who is at those meetings?

The VRBPAC Advisory Committee

The Committee reviews and evaluates data concerning the safety, effectiveness, and appropriate use of vaccines and related biological products which are intended for use in the prevention, treatment, or diagnosis of human diseases, and, as required, any other products for which the Food and Drug Administration has regulatory responsibility. The Committee also considers the quality and relevance of FDA’s research program which provides scientific support for the regulation of these products and makes appropriate recommendations to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs.

The Committee shall consist of a core of 15 voting members including the Chair. Members and the Chair are selected by the Commissioner or designee from among authorities knowledgeable in the fields of immunology, molecular biology, rDNA, virology; bacteriology, epidemiology or biostatistics, vaccine policy, vaccine safety science, federal immunization activities, vaccine development including translational and clinical evaluation programs, allergy, preventive medicine, infectious diseases, pediatrics, microbiology, and biochemistry.

FDA

Applying for Membership on FDA Advisory Committees

As part of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) ongoing efforts to recruit qualified experts with minimal conflicts of interest who are interested in serving on FDA advisory committees, FDA is requesting nominations for members to serve on its advisory committees….

Conflicts of Interest:

Potential candidates are asked to provide detailed information concerning such matters as financial holdings, employment, and research grants and/or contracts in order to permit evaluation of possible sources of conflict of interest.

FDA

Oooh Boy, they do not sound good. I am digging up and placing here a lot of info on each individual. However I have screened out much much more. What struck me, is out of the sixteen only three do not have major expertise in pediatrics. ALL have ties to NIH/Fauxi or the FDA or the CDC. Some have ties to drug companies and more than one has ties to China. Most are women and three are foreign educated and probably not American born. Out of over 300 million people, you would think they could find Americans.

First a cameo of each of the players, and then if you wish you can look at some of the other information I dug out. If you click on the name it takes you to the information they provided to the FDA, often pages and pages citing the papers they wrote and who they worked for. This is the information I used with some added from other sources.

CAMEOS

DIRECTOR
Prabhakara Atreya, Female connected to Fauci She has no FDA bio.

Ph.D. biochemistry Memorial University of Newfoundland, in Canada 1987

Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 1989 – 1990 (messing with fiber cell membranes of frog, chick, bovine, rabbit and human lenses)

Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY – Papers 1990 &1995

FDA since 2010 per BIO but actually a paper shows she was working @ FDA in 1999.

NIH paper shows she was at NIH in 1998
Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY – Papers 1990 &1995 (Only 13 papers found)

…..

Chair
Hana El Sahly, M.D.
Baylor College of Medicine (Woman)

Wrote paper on Remdesivir used by Fauci to trick President Trump. The one referred to by DR. McCullough 

…..

Paula Annunziato, M.D. ***
Vice President and Therapeutic Area HeadVaccines Clinical ResearchMerck

Seems to specialize in Pediatric Vaccines.

Archana Chatterjee, M.D., Ph.D.
Dean Chicago Medical School (Woman)

specialises Pediatrics Vaccines

Pune University, Maharashtra, India 1979-1983

Army Medical Corps, Military Hospital, Gaya, India, 1985 -1988

She is nationally recognized for her work in vaccine development for human papilloma viruses – think Gardasil. I wonder how well acquainted she is with Gregg Sylvester, below & Bill Gates? – Controversial vaccine studies: Gates and Infertility

…….

CAPT Amanda Cohn, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatrics, Vaccines

Chief Medical Officer – National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases – CDC
The mission of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) is the prevention of disease, disability, and death through immunization

59 Scientific papers: many authored with Nancy E Messonnier

Time to check the Atlantia graveyards… And I am NOT kidding.

…..

Hayley Gans, M.D. (woman)
Expertise: Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases
Department of Pediatrics
Stanford University Medical Center

Author with a bunch of Chinese with FUNDING from China, using the bogus PCR test to say people who have recovered can catch Covid again and re-infect others. This is WHY natural immunity was never on the table and vaccines were.

….

Holly Janes, Ph.D.
Expertise: Biostatistics
Professor – Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division
Division of Public Health Sciences – Seattle, WA

Holly is a biostatistician working on the design and analysis of vaccine studies, with a particular expertise in HIV prevention and vaccine science. Worked for NIH and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

…..

Michael Kurilla, M.D., Ph.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases, Pathology
Director, Division of Clinical Innovation National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences
National Institutes of Health (NIH <– He works for Fauci)
Bethesda, MD 20852

….

Myron Levine, M.D., D.T.P.H., F.A.A.P

Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Associate Dean for Global Health – Vaccinology and Infectious Diseases

Center for Vaccine Development – University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore, MD

Faculty at CVD have served in critical leadership roles in U.S. and international research and policy efforts. For example, Neuzil co-chaired the COVID-19 Prevention Trials Network, a research network established by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [ Dr. Fauci was appointed director of NIAID in 1984.] in response to the pandemic. Vaccine research at CVD continues, with an emphasis on reaching the populations most impacted by COVID-19 and testing pediatric vaccines.

University of Maryland

….

H. Cody Meissner, M.D. (Male)
Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics – Tufts University School of Medicine
Director, Pediatric Infectious Disease


H. Cody Meissner, MD, is a leading national expert on childhood vaccinations who consults with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on periodic updates to the recommended immunization schedule for newborns through 18-year-olds. At Tufts Children’s Hospital at Tufts Medical Center he heads the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases…

H. Cody Meissner, MD, Vice Chair (’19)

H. Cody Meissner, MD | Tufts Medical Center

…..

Paul Offit, M.D.

Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

Paul A. Offit, MD is the Director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia as well as the Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology and a Professor of Pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a recipient of many awards including the J. Edmund Bradley Prize for Excellence in Pediatrics from the University of Maryland Medical School, the Young Investigator Award in Vaccine Development from the Infectious Disease Society of America, and a Research Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Offit has published more than 160 papers in medical and scientific journals in the areas of rotavirus-specific immune responses and vaccine safety….

FDA

In 2017, Dr. Offit was a weekly columnist for The Daily Beast.

A look at his recent peer-reviewed papers shows he is targeting vaccine hesitant parents.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Offit+PA&cauthor_id=24011750&size=20

This says it all:

Plotkin SA, Offit PA, Reiss D.: Important New Resource for Clinicians Giving Expert Witness Testimony on Vaccines. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 37(12), Dec. 2018.

To the Editors:

Vaccination is under attack by individuals who occasionally use the legal system to oppose mandatory vaccination laws and in some cases to obtain exemptions for particular children whose parents are opposed to vaccination. During the legal proceedings, as we have witnessed, experts testifying in favor of vaccination may be challenged with references from journals of doubtful quality that oppose vaccination.

To provide important references that discuss and disprove claims made against vaccines, the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia has created a library of references addressing certain safety issues that may be useful as an aid and refresher to clinicians giving expert testimony on the safety of vaccines and to lawyers defending vaccination of children.

The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia legal library may be entered through the web address vaccine.chop.edu/safety-references.

We would be grateful if you could inform your colleagues about the availability of this resource, which should be of great value for experts testifying for vaccination and for clinicians who need to convince parents about vaccine safety. https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Fulltext/2018/12000/Important_New_Resource_for_Clinicians_Giving.42.aspx

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

………..

Steven Pergam, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Medical Director
Infection Prevention
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance — Seattle, WA

He seems to specialize in cancer and immuno-compromised and seems to be the best of a bad bunch, until you see he is tied at the hip to NIH & CDC from 2009 to present as well as to various drug companies.

….

Jay Portnoy, M.D.

Expertise: Consumer Representative (This is the guy representing the public)

Professor of Pediatrics

Medical Director of Telemedicine Section of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, MO

150 papers mainly on allergies. American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology – “…a professional medical association of more than 6,000 allergist-immunologists and allied health professionals…” AND if you search long enough…. You find the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology wrote an Article urging allergists to support more funding for NIH (Fauci)

He is also on a Task Force Paper recommending those with severe egg allergies to go ahead and get the Flu vaccine, just do it at the allergist because “… personnel to recognize and equipment to treat anaphylaxis need to be immediately available…”

….

Andrea Shane, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc.

Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics, Director Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases – Emory University School of Medicine – Atlanta, GA

International exchange fellowship, Children’s Hospital at Montefiore and Beijing Children’s Hospital, Beijing, China October-November, 1999

Lieutenant Commander, United States Public Health Service, 2001-2003;

Inactive Reserve Corps (IRC) 2003-until IRC dissolved in 2010.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis working group, appointed member, 2009-until committee dissolved by CDC in 2011.

01 August 2007- 01 August 2016 Co- investigator, NIH/NIAID/DMID Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU)

influenza vaccine to breastfeeding women trial, DMID#09-007;

…..

Paul Spearman, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Director, Division of Infectious Diseases
Albert B. Sabin Chair in Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Professor, Department of Pediatrics
University of Cincinnati School of Medicine Cincinnati, OH

This guy is a really big heavy weight.

There is cross-over with the lady above, Andrea Shane. Any bets he pulled her in to be his ‘female puppet’ – a good little government soldier?

03/2009-09/2016: Vice Chair for Research Department of Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine

03/2009-09/2016: Chief Research Officer Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta, GA

[Andrea Shane is Attending Pediatrician Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Emory Healthcare Grady Health 2006 – present ]

This guy has a full page of COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS, National and International, and a whole section for NIH Councils and Study Sections AND… NIH/NIAID HIV Vaccine Trials Network – Protocol Chair, HVTN 088 Protocol 2010-present

Not to mention his connections to the drug companies and China.

………

Geeta K. Swamy, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Senior Associate Dean Vice Chair for Research & Faculty Development
Associate Professor, ObGyn, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Duke University, Durham, NC

2004 – 2006 Duke University Associate Faculty Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Division of Clinical & Epidemiological Research

2009 – present Duke University Vaccine Trials Unit Investigator Duke Translational Research Institute Durham, NC

Grants from, NIH-NIAID, GlaxoSmithKline, CDC-NCIRD, ACOG/Merck & Company,

2015

Consultative Workshop: Immunology Research Gaps Related to Maternal Immunization – Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

WHO Brighton Collaboration Global Alignment of Immunization Safety Assessment in Pregnancy – Chair, Fetal Distress Working Group

…

Gregg Sylvester, M.D., M.P.H. +
Expertise: Alternate Industry Representative
Vice President – Medical Affairs, Seqirus Inc., Summit, NJ

• Launched Pfizer’s Pediatric and Adult Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine,

Spearheaded science-based rationale to preserve Pfizer’s Prevnar 13 infant schedule in US recommendations

• Launched Merck’s HPV4 vaccine in over 100 countries

• Partnered with community organizations in Delaware to reduce infant mortality, teen pregnancy rates and HIV rates

Created the medical affairs strategy for Merck’s HPV4 vaccine, Gardasil

….

Vaccine Approval For Children

Now, if you have time & stomach, a deeper dive into the people who unleashed the Clot Shot on babies.

DIRECTOR
Prabhakara Atreya, Ph.D.
Division of Scientific Advisors & Consultants
Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research
Food and Drug Administration – Silver Spring, MD

Dr. Prabhakara Atreya, an Indian American scientist is a 10 year veteran at the US Food and Drug Administration which she joined in 2010. Prior to this appointment, Atreya worked at the National Institutes of Health, leading the Office of Scientific Review. She has a PhD in biochemistry, biophysics and molecular biology from the Memorial University of Newfoundland, in Canada. She was one of the team of US regulators and independent experts of Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC). At the time of emergency use authorization for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, she was the Acting Designated Federal Officer of VRBPAC.

LINKED-IN

Thesis:
Atreya, Prabhakara Lakshmi (1987) Conformational aspects of proline hydroxylation in collagen biosynthesis : studies with synthetic peptides. Doctoral (PhD) thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Probable Papers (13):
Affiliation: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington
I think this paper is what Fauci Spotted:
Construction of in-frame chimeric plant viral genes by simplified PCR strategies.
Atreya CD, Atreya PL, Pirone TP. Plant Mol Biol. 1992 Jun;19

Site-directed mutations in the potyvirus HC-Pro gene affect helper component activity, virus accumulation, and symptom expression in infected tobacco plants.
Atreya CD, Atreya PL, Thornbury DW, Pirone TP.Virology. 1992 Nov

Mutational analysis of the coat protein N-terminal amino acids involved in potyvirus transmission by aphids.
Atreya PL, Lopez-Moya JJ, Chu M, Atreya CD, Pirone TP.J Gen Virol. 1995 Feb;76
…
Her papers then show a move to NIH
Affiliation: Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0720, USA.
The NS1 protein of human respiratory syncytial virus is a potent inhibitor of minigenome transcription and RNA replication.
Atreya PL, Peeples ME, Collins PL.J Virol. 1998 Feb;

And then the move to FDA.
Affiliation: Laboratory of Pediatric and Respiratory Viral Diseases, DVP/CBER, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Respiratory syncytial virus strain A2 is resistant to the antiviral effects of type I interferons and human MxA.
Atreya PL, Kulkarni S.Virology. 1999 Sep 1; (@ FDA)

Role of type I IFNs in the in vitro attenuation of live, temperature-sensitive vaccine strains of human respiratory syncytial virus.
Loveys DA, Kulkarni S, Atreya PL.Virology. 2000 Jun 
 
……..
Her resume STINKS! She has three papers on human respiratory syncytial virus, and a bunch of early papers on cloning and tinkering with plants @ Univ Kentucky and earlier papers messing with fiber cell membranes of frog, chick, bovine, rabbit and human eye lenses @ Wayne State Univ, MI NOTHING ELSE except the Sex Card, Race Card and probably not American born.
……..

These are her picks:

CHAIR:
Hana El Sahly, M.D.
Baylor College of Medicine
May 18, 2020
Hana El Sahly on Remdesivir and the NIH’s Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (Well that answers WHO set up elders for DEATH!)

On May 15, Texas Monthly reported on their conversation with Dr. Hana El Sahly of Houston’s Baylor College of Medicine. In the coming days, she will begin registering hospitalized participants at Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center and Ben Taub Hospital for the second phase of the National Institutes of Health’s Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial, or ACTT. She’s Baylor’s lead investigator for participation in the program, which in its first phase analyzed a randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the investigational antiviral remdesivir. Preliminary findings suggested that patients treated with remdesivir recovered faster than patients who received a placebo, which led to the May 1 announcement that remdesivir would be the first medication to receive FDA authorization for emergency use for COVID-19.
“We found that for patients who have COVID-19 pneumonia bad enough to get them to the hospital, treatment with remdesivir expedites the time to recovery by an average of four days per patient,” says El Sahly…

Hana El Sahly, M.D.

Education

Undergraduate education American University of Beirut, Lebannon Bachelor of Science, 1987-1990Medical education American University of Beirut, Lebannon School of Medicine, Doctor of Medicine, 1990-1994


Scientific Papers (46)


Several presentations on “HIV vaccines”
Fauci must love her:

Review Panels, Committees
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health-sponsored vaccine clinical trial 05-0011; 2006
Reviewer, Loan Repayment Program, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health; 2008
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health-sponsored vaccine clinical trial 08-0009; 2009
Reviewer, Scientific Review Program, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; 2010
Member, Data Safety Monitoring Board, Protein Sciences Corporation vaccine clinical trial PSC-22; 2010
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health–sponsored study DMID 10-0043; 2011
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health-sponsored study DMID 11-0007; 2011
Reviewer, Scientific Review Program, National Institutes of Health, P01 application “Towards A Universal Influenza Vaccine”; 2012
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, National Institutes of Health sponsored study DMID 13-0087; 2014
Member, Publications Committee, Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2014-2017
Member, Safety Monitoring Committee, Mercia Pharma Inc-sponsored study NOVA MAS-1; 2015
Member of the Food and Drug Administration Vaccine and Related Biological Advisory Committee; 2016–
Reviewer, Influenza pre-applications, US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command-Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, 2016
WHAT THE HECK IS THIS!! => Member, ID week program planning committee, 2017-2019

Is this her daughter: Dr. Hana Mohammed Elsahly, MD 28, practicing in Houston, TX?
……

Paula Annunziato, M.D. ***
Vice President and Therapeutic Area Head
Vaccines Clinical Research
Merck
Seems to specialize in Pediatric Vaccines.
Nuv said…

…..

Archana Chatterjee, M.D., Ph.D.
Dean Chicago Medical School
Vice President for Medical Affairs
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
M.B.B.S. (Equivalent to M.D.): Pune University, Maharashtra, India 1979-1983
Army Medical Corps, Military Hospital, Gaya, India, 1985 -1988
Major Scientific Interest: Vaccine development. She forgets to mention her main trial target is infants.

Principal Investigator: Recent Research Projects/Grants
GSK = GlaxoSmithKlinePled Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations & Failure to Report Safety Data – July 2012
(Nice people she worked for.)

Date: 2018-2019 Sponsor: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration For Community Living

Date: 2018-2020 Sponsor: Pfizer A Phase 2, Randomized,Trial ….Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Infants.

Date: 2018-2020 Sponsor: GSK …Study to Assess the Safety & Immunogenicity of Meningococcal Vaccine & 1 Pneumococcal Vaccine when Administered Concomitantly with Routine Vaccines to Healthy Infants.

Date: 2018-2020 Sponsor: GSK … dose-escalation study to evaluate safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals’ respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) investigational vaccine based on the RSV viral proteins F, N and M2-1 encoded by chimpanzee-derived adenovector.. when administered… to RSVseropositive infants aged 12 to 23 months.

Date: 2017-2019 Sponsor: MedImmune ….Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MED18897, a Monoclonal Antibody With an Extended Half-life Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus, in Healthy Preterm Infants. [Are they going to give the infants the RSV?]

Date: 10/2015-10/2017 Sponsor: Merck…, Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Different Formulations of V114 [15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine ] in Healthy Adults and Infants.

Date: 10/2015-10/2016 Sponsor: Astra Zeneca An observational study of RSV hospitalization in preterm infants.

Date: 9/2014-2017 Sponsor: GSK … multinational study … of GSK Biologicals’ MMR vaccine (209762)… compared to Merck (M-M-R®II or VaxPro), as a first dose, both co-administered with Varivax, Havrix (all subjects) and Prevnar 13 (US subset) in healthy children 12 to 15 months of age.

Peer-Reviewed Articles (120)

Appointments:
2020 – Invited to serve on NIH (NCI) Special Emphasis Panel to evaluate grant applications received in response to the RFA(s) with primary focus on HIV-Associated Malignancy Research

2019 to present – Invited to serve as and appointed a member on the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) of the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)

2012 -2019 – Consultant to the US FDA

2014 – Merck Vision 2027 Expert Input Forum on Vaccine Policy

2008 – 2012 – Member, Anti Infective Drug Advisory Committee (AIDAC), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US FDA

2008 -2012 – Invited to serve on the National Vaccine Advisory Boards for Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis Pharmaceutical Companies

2008– Merck Vaccination Service Award, recognition of commitment to improving public health through vaccination.

2006 – Invited member, Sanofi-Pasteur, MedImmune, Abbott Pharmaceutical Companies’ National Advisory Boards

2003 – Invited Session Chair at an International Symposium organized by the Merieux Foundation entitled, “Vaccination in Tomorrow’s Society – New Information Pathways”. Annecy, France

Merieux Foundation …. AND THAT GETS INTERESTING…. WIKI

In October 2004, the FM was the beneficiary of a Franco-Chinese agreement that led to the creation of the Institut Pasteur de Shanghai.…
In 2012, the FM continued its partnership with the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
In 2015, the CAMS-FM partnership founded the Christophe Mérieux Laboratory (CML) at the Institute of Pathogen Biology in Beijing to focus on the study pneumonia and tuberculosis. Researchers at the CML “benefit from and training modules developed by the Emerging Pathogens Laboratory in Lyon”,[5][6] a BSL-4 lab which was also built by the FM in 1999 and since 2005 is now operated by INSERM.[7]

In 2015, the FM participated in the donation by the French government of CIRI’s Biosafety Level 4 expertise to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
In January 2017, a researcher who was financed by the CAMS-FM partnership participated in a study of human rhinovirus and genotype A21…..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fondation_M%C3%A9rieux

WIKI

“Mentorship and sponsorship of faculty and learners has been a hallmark of Dr. Chatterjee’s entire thirty- year career in academic medicine…” LINK [I am sure she has been kissing FauXi’s ass for years to get funding.]
MORE:

….Board certified in general pediatrics and pediatric infectious diseases, she is nationally recognized for her work in vaccine development for human papilloma viruses and in antibiotic resistance. She has completed more than 100 clinical trials and published more than 50 peer-reviewed articles, 23 invited review articles, 17 book chapters and one book.

The first woman and person of color to serve as dean of CMS, Dr. Chatterjee, a native of India, earned her medical degree from the Armed Forces Medical College at Pune University in India and her PhD from the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) in Omaha….

https://www.rosalindfranklin.edu/news/rfu-announces-selection-of-new-dean-for-chicago-medical-school/

…..

CAPT Amanda Cohn, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatrics, Vaccines
Chief Medical Officer
National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) MISSION | CDC
The mission of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) is the prevention of disease, disability, and death through immunization and by control of respiratory and related diseases.

CDC

POSTGRADUATE TRAINING 2004 – 2006 Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC, Atlanta, GA
WORK EXPERIENCE :
3/2019-present Chief Medical Officer (Acting), Vaccine Policy, Preparedness, and Global Health, Office of the Director, NCIRD, CDC
11/2015-present Executive Secretary, ACIP and Senior Advisor, Vaccines Office of the Director, NCIRD, CDC
5/2014-11/2015 Deputy Division Director, Immunization Services Division, NCIRD, CDC
01/2013-05/2014 Acting Epidemiology Team Lead Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases, DBD, NCIRD, OD
06/2006-12/2012 Medical Officer, Epidemiology Team Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Division of Bacterial Disease, NCIRD, CDC
07/2004-06/2006 Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) Officer, Epidemiology Program Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA Assigned to: Bacterial Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, National Immunization Program

Scientific papers: 59 many authored with Nancy E Messonnier
Great titles like:

  1. Multistate Outbreak of Respiratory Infections Among Unaccompanied Children, June 2014-July 2014.
    Conclusions: This respiratory disease outbreak was due to multiple pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 5 and influenza viruses. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations prevented further transmission. Future efforts to prevent similar outbreaks will benefit from use of both vaccines. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27001799/
    [How about CLOSING THE DARN BORDERS!]
  2. Understanding Factors Affecting University A Students’ Decision to Receive an Unlicensed Serogroup B Meningococcal Vaccine.
  3. Compliance with recommendations and opportunities for vaccination at ages 11 to 12 years: evaluation of the 2009 national immunization survey-teen.
  4. Adolescent immunizations and other clinical preventive services: a needle and a hook?
  5. Immunizations in the United States: a rite of passage.
  6. Attitudes, practices, and preferences of pediatricians regarding initiation of hepatitis B immunization at birth.
    ……

Hayley Gans, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases
Professor of Pediatrics
Department of Pediatrics
Stanford University Medical Center


Fellowship: Stanford University School of Medicine (1998) CA

  • Medical Education: State University of New York Syracuse Medical School Registrar (1991) NY
  • Board Certification: American Board of Pediatrics, Pediatric Infectious Diseases (1999)
  • Residency: Stanford University Medical Center (1994) CA
  • Internship: Stanford University Medical Center (1992) CA
  • M.D., SUNY at Syracuse, Medicine (1991)

Fellowship Program Director, Pediatric Infectious Diseases (2006 – 2017)

  • Co-director, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Program for Immunocompromised Hosts, Children’s Hospital at Stanford (2013 – Present)
  • Associate Fellowship Director, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Stanford University Medical Center (2017 – Present)
  • Director, Fellowship Education, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Medical Center (2017 – Present)

Sort of BLAAaaaah until you look at this paper:

Remember her focus is kids.

July 2020 Lancet preprint.
Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Positivity of Infected and Recovered Patients: A Single Center COVID-19 Experience and Potential Implications https://autopapers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3605268

Jia Huang – Southern University of Science and Technology CHINA and 42 other authors with only 7 others not Chinese. The other universities were  Sichuan University, China and Sanford.

https://autopapers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=4257785

And then it REALLY GETS GOOD:

FUNDING STATEMENT: This work was supported by grants from Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (Jia Huang, No. SZSM201812065); Bill & Melinda Gates Foundations (Lei Liu); and from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Jia Huang, No. 81501651)

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS: The authors declare no competing interests.

ETHICS APPROVAL STATEMENT: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology.[CHINA]

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive detection in infected but recovered individuals has been reported. Patients who have recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could profoundly impact the health care system if a subset were to be polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive again with reactivated SARS-CoV-2. We sought to define the kinetics and relevance of PCR-positive recurrence during recovery from acute COVID-19 to better understand risks for prolonged infectivity and reinfection.

METHODS: A series of COVID-19 414 patients, at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China from January 11 to April 23, 2020. Univariable and multivariable statistical analysis of inpatient data were performed to develop an algorithm to predict patients at risk of recurrence of PCR positivity.
[REMEMBER PCR TESTS RETURN MAJOR FALSE POSITIVES – Reiner Fuellmich say this guy Droston isn’t a Doctor at all, but a bull**** artist. Christian Drosten & the Fraud Behind COVID 19 PCR Testing ]

FINDINGS: 16·7% recovered patients with PCR positive recurring one to three times, despite being in strict quarantine. Younger patients with mild pulmonary respiratory syndrome had higher risk of PCR positivity recurrence. The recurrence prediction model had an area under the ROC curve of 0·786.

INTERPRETATION: This case series provides clinical characteristics of recovered COVID-19 patients with recurrent SARS-CoV-2 positivity, despite strict quarantine, at a 16·7% rate. Use of a recurrence prediction algorithm may identify patients at high risk of recurrent SARS-CoV-2 positivity and help understand reactivation and reinfection possibilities to establish protocols for health policy.

LANCET

This is a very important paper because it REFUTES NATURAL IMMUNITY and green lights MORE DRACONIAN ECONOMY KILLING ‘Health Measures’

……

Holly Janes, Ph.D.
Expertise: Biostatistics
Professor — Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division
Division of Public Health Sciences – Seattle, WA

Dr. Holly Janes is a biostatistician working on the design and analysis of vaccine studies, with a particular expertise in HIV prevention and vaccine science. She also develops and applies statistical methodology for evaluating biomarkers for risk prediction and optimizing treatment decisions

Current Projects

Leadership for the Statistical Data Management Center of the HIV Vaccine Trials Network

Statistical methods for HIV prevention efficacy trials

Statistical methods for human challenge studies

Statistical evaluation of biomarkers for making treatment decisions https://www.fredhutch.org/en/faculty-lab-directory/janes-holly.html

HONORS, AWARDS, SCHOLARSHIPS:

2008 Travel Award, AIDS Vaccine Conference, Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

2000 Cardiovascular Biostatistics Training Grant, National Institutes of Health

EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES:

Associate Editor Journal of the National Cancer Institute (2015-2018)

Diagnostic and Prognostic Research (2016-present)

Statistical Communications in Infectious Diseases (2019-present)

RESEARCH FUNDING:

Active Funding:

2 UM1 AI068635 (PI: Gilbert P) 01/01/2014 – 11/30/2020 5.4 Calendar NIH/NIAID SDMC HIV Vaccine Trials Network

2 R01 CA152089 (PI: Janes H) 07/01/2010 – 11/30/2021 4.8 Calendar

NIH/NCI

Statistical Methods for Evaluating Markers for Treatment Selection

Interventions for disease treatment and prevention can potentially be made more cost-effective by using markers to identify in advance the individuals most likely to benefit from the treatment, and thus avoid treating those unlikely to benefit. [Rationed Health Care anyone?]

Lots more Mostly NIH and then this goodie:

38744 7/1/2006-4/30/2012

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Vaccine Immunology Statistical Center (VISC) The VISC will provide 1) statistical and study design support for pre-clinical vaccine performance trials, 2) centralized data management services for the standardized evaluation of vaccine candidates, 3) development of new statistical methods for cross-species correlates-of-protection analysis.

Role: Faculty Statistician

BIBLIOGRAPHY Publications in Refereed Journals

1. Pepe MS, Janes H, Longton G, Leisenring W, Newcomb P. Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(9):882-90.

2. Janes H, Pepe M, Kooperberg C, Newcomb P. Identifying target populations for screening or not screening using logic regression. Stat Med. 2005;24(9):1321-38.

.

.

12. McElrath MJ, De Rosa SC, Moodie Z, Dubey S, Kierstead L, Janes H, Defawe OD, Carter DK, Hural J, Akondy R, Buchbinder SP, Robertson MN, Mehrotra DV, Self SG, Corey L, Shiver JW, Casimiro DR. HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity in the test-of-concept Step study: A casecohort analysis. Lancet. 2008;372(9653):1894-905. PMCID: 2774110.

13. Pepe MS, Feng Z, Janes H, Bossuyt PM, Potter JD. Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: Standards for study design. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(20):1432-8. PMCID: 2567415.

.

.

21. Barnabas RV, Wasserheit JN, Huang Y, Janes H, Morrow R, Fuchs J, Mark KE, Casapia M, Mehrotra DV, Buchbinder SP, Corey L. Impact of herpes simplex virus type 2 on HIV-1 acquisition and progression in an HIV vaccine trial (the Step study). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;57(3):238-44. PMCID: 3446850.

22. Fitzgerald DW, Janes H, Robertson M, Coombs R, Frank I, Gilbert P, Loufty M, Mehrotra D, Duerr A. An Ad5-vectored HIV-1 vaccine elicits cell-mediated immunity but does not affect disease progression in HIV-1-infected male subjects: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial (the Step study). J Infect Dis. 2011;203(6):765-72. PMCID: 3119328.

And many more. I am sure Fauci loves her.

……

Michael Kurilla, M.D., Ph.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases, Pathology
Director, Division of Clinical Innovation
National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences
National Institutes of Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) is one of 27 Institutes and Centers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The focus of NCATS is to advance the science of translation, which is the process of turning observations into interventions to improve health.

National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences

……

Myron Levine, M.D., D.T.P.H., F.A.A.P
Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Simon & Bessie Grollman Distinguished Professor
Associate Dean for Global Health
Vaccinology and Infectious Diseases Center for Vaccine Development
University of Maryland School of Medicine

Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health – UMB …

University of Maryland School of Medicine

For more than a year, researchers at the Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health (CVD) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM) have been working tirelessly on COVID-19 research, helping to pave the way for the use of vaccines and therapies that are being administered across the country.

Under the leadership of CVD director Kathleen Neuzil, MD, MPH, FIDSA, the Myron M. Levine, MD, DTPH, Professor in Vaccinology at UMSOM, researchers quickly pivoted decades of vaccine and infectious disease research experience toward combating this deadly virus, which continues to impact millions of people around the world.

Faculty at CVD have served in critical leadership roles in U.S. and international research and policy efforts. For example, Neuzil co-chaired the COVID-19 Prevention Trials Network, a research network established by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID Dr. Fauciwas appointed director of NIAID in 1984.] in response to the pandemic. Vaccine research at CVD continues, with an emphasis on reaching the populations most impacted by COVID-19 and testing pediatric vaccines.

CVD experts have launched an expansive grassroots campaign to educate the community and reach those who have been hit the hardest by this terrible virus, including members of the Black and Brown communities, the elderly, and those with underlying health risks.

“Our CVD team has worked tirelessly and meticulously to advance COVID-19 vaccines and to ensure they are reaching the most affected populations,” Neuzil said. “Our work continues as we begin testing vaccines in children and investigate booster vaccines to address the risk of COVID-19 variants.”  [Like this Dude is neutral?]

Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health (CVD …

Our research, surveillance and vaccine development focuses on four key areas: Enteric Diseases, Malaria, Influenza and Respiratory Diseases, and Emerging Pathogens.

Overview

Our faculty and staff are experts in the field of global health and vaccinology, and they are dedicated to improving global health by conducting innovative, world-leading research in Baltimore and around the world. Our key mission is to harness the power of vaccines to prevent disease and save lives in the most vulnerable populations.

…….

H. Cody Meissner, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Professor of Pediatrics
Tufts University School of Medicine
Director, Pediatric Infectious Disease
Tufts Medical Center
POST GRADUATE TRAINING

1973 – 1975 Internship and Residency Boston Floating Hospital New England Medical Center Boston, MA

1975 – 1977 Research Associate Public Health Service National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institute (NICHD) Bethesda, MD Parent Agency is National Institutes of Health (Fauci)

2008 – Present Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

2010 – Present Massachusetts Vaccine Purchasing Advisory Council

2017 – Present National Vaccine Advisory Committee, United States Department of Health and Human Services

2017 – Present Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, United States Department of Health and Human Services

AWARDS

Massachusetts 2017 Recipient of the CDC Childhood Immunization Award

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Striking a Balance Between Individual Rights and Community Benefit.

Meissner HC, Nair N, Plotkin SA. JAMA. 2019 Jan 29


The Importance of MMR Immunization in the United States.

Perrone O, Meissner HC. Pediatrics. 2020 Aug


Principles of Vaccine Licensure, Approval, and Recommendations for Use.

Pickering LK, Meissner HC, Orenstein WA, Cohn AC. Mayo Clin Proc. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

H. Cody Meissner, MD | Tufts Medical Center

H. Cody Meissner, MD, is a leading national expert on childhood vaccinations who consults with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on periodic updates to the recommended immunization schedule for newborns through 18-year-olds. At Tufts Children’s Hospital at Tufts Medical Center he heads the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases

….

Paul Offit, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Professor of Pediatrics
Division of Infectious Diseases
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

Paul A. Offit, MD is the Director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia as well as the Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology and a Professor of Pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a recipient of many awards including the J. Edmund Bradley Prize for Excellence in Pediatrics from the University of Maryland Medical School, the Young Investigator Award in Vaccine Development from the Infectious Disease Society of America, and a Research Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Offit has published more than 160 papers in medical and scientific journals in the areas of rotavirus-specific immune responses and vaccine safety. He is also the coinventor of the rotavirus vaccine, RotaTeq, recommended for universal use in infants by the CDC….

FDA

In 2017, Dr. Offit was a weekly columnist for The Daily Beast.

Papers:

2018

Plotkin, S.A., P.A. Offit, and P. Bégué, : “Vaccine mandates in France will save lives,”  Science 359: 283-284, 2018.

Plotkin SA, Offit PA, Reiss D.: Important New Resource for Clinicians Giving Expert Witness Testimony on Vaccines. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 37(12), Dec. 2018.

To the Editors:

Vaccination is under attack by individuals who occasionally use the legal system to oppose mandatory vaccination laws and in some cases to obtain exemptions for particular children whose parents are opposed to vaccination. During the legal proceedings, as we have witnessed, experts testifying in favor of vaccination may be challenged with references from journals of doubtful quality that oppose vaccination.

To provide important references that discuss and disprove claims made against vaccines, the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia has created a library of references addressing certain safety issues that may be useful as an aid and refresher to clinicians giving expert testimony on the safety of vaccines and to lawyers defending vaccination of children.

The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia legal library may be entered through the web address vaccine.chop.edu/safety-references.

We would be grateful if you could inform your colleagues about the availability of this resource, which should be of great value for experts testifying for vaccination and for clinicians who need to convince parents about vaccine safety. https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Fulltext/2018/12000/Important_New_Resource_for_Clinicians_Giving.42.aspx

2017

Offit, P.A.: “Commentary: Science Denialism Isn’t New to the Trump Administration,”  Philadelphia Inquirer December 22 2017.

Offit, P.A.: “By Regulating Homeopathic Remedies, FDA Holds ‘Modern-Day Snake-Oil Salesmen’ Accountable,“  Philadelphia Inquirer  December 28 2017.

2013

Williams SE, Rothman RL, Offit PA. Schaffner W, Sullivan M, Edwards KM. A randomized trial to increase acceptance of childhood vaccines by vaccine-hesitant parents: a pilot study. Academic Pediatrics (2013) 13: 475-480.

A look at his recent papers shows he is targeting vaccine hesitant parents.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Offit+PA&cauthor_id=24011750&size=20

…..

Steven Pergam, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases
Medical Director
Infection Prevention
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance — Seattle, WA

He seems to specialize in cancer and immuno-compromised and seems to be the best of a bad bunch. But then we look at this:

SPECIAL NATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES:

2009–2010 Independent Safety Monitor, NIH/NIAD, DMID Influenza Protocols: 09-0039, 09-0043, 09-0047, 09-0053, and 09-0054: H1N1

2010–2011 Independent Safety Monitor, NIH/NIAID, DMID Protocol 09-0002: Comparison of the Safety and Immunogenicity of Lyophilized IMVAMUNE® (1×108 TCID50) versus Liquid Formulation IMVAMUNE® (1×108 TCID50) Administered by the Subcutaneous Route and a Lower Dose Liquid Formulation IMVAMUNE® (2×107 TCID50) Administered by the Intradermal Route in Healthy Vaccinia-Naïve Individuals (Bavarian Nordic)

2011–2013 Member, Data and Safety Monitoring Board: Effect of tenofovir on genital HSV shedding: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial

2015-present Member, Zoster Working Group, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services

2016-present Member, Abstract Selection Committee, Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)

2016-2017 Independent Safety Monitor, NIH/NAID, DMID Protocol 16-0117: Comparison .of High vs. Standard Dose Flu Vaccine in Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

.

.

.

15. RESEARCH FUNDING

Current: Washington Vaccine Alliance (WAVA) Pilot Award (PI: S. Pergam) 10/1/13-6/30/20 Interactions between gastrointestinal microbiota, Influenza vaccine responses and respiratory viral infections in a large cohort of clinic employees

BAA-NIAID [Fauxi Director]-DMID-NIH-AI (PI: M. Ison; Subcontract PI: Pergam) 5/1/16-4/30/20 Phase II Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Nitazoxanide in Acute and Chronic Norovirus in Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Solid Organ Transplant Recipients 1U01AI132004-NIAID (PI: N.Halasa; Subcontract PI: Pergam)

7/5/2017-6/30/20 High vs. Standard Dose Flu Vaccine in Adult Stem Cell Transplant Recipients 1R01AI134808-NIAID (PI: D. Fredricks)

.

.

Completed:

NIH/NIAID T32 AI007-044 (PI: W. Stamm) 9/1/05-2/1/07 Host Defense Training in Allergy and Infectious Diseases

.

.

Industry Sponsored Clinical Trials:

Chimerix, Inc. (PI: Pergam) 2016-current An Intermediate-size, Expanded Access Protocol to Provide Bincidofovir for the Treatment of Serious Adenovirus Infection or Disease, Protocol CMX001-35”

6/17/2017-present Prior Industry Trials Merck, Sharp & Dohme Co., Inc (PI: Pergam)

2012-2015 Pergam, SA – CV Page 15 A Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of V212 in Recipients of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplants (HCT)

Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* (PI: Pergam) 2013-2015 A Phase IIIb, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Demonstrate the Safety & Efficacy of Fidaxomicin for Prophylaxis against C difficile-Associated Diarrhea in Individuals Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplants (HCT) *formerly Optimer pharmaceuticals

KRT16/26/21, 01:40 PM

$ACXP In December 2014, Merck ($MRK) paid US$9.5 billion for Cubist ($CBST) largely to obtain marketing access to agents daptomycin and fidaxomicin. https://stocktwits.com/symbol/CBST

Chimerix, Inc. (PI: Pergam) 2016 A Multicenter Non-Interventional Study to Obtain Retrospective Data for Subjects Previously Diagnosed with Adenovirus Infection to serve as Matched Historical Controls for Study CMX001-304; Protocol No. CMX001-305

Chimerix, Inc. (PI: Pergam) 2015 – 2017 A Phase 3, Open-label, Multicenter Study of the Safety/Tolerability and Efficacy of Brincidofovir (CMX001) for the Prevention of Adenovirus (AdV) Disease in Subjects with Asymptomatic AdV Infection at Risk of Progression and for the Treatment of Subjects with Localized or Disseminated AdV Disease

Chimerix, Inc.

 All that shimmers isn’t … enhanced by lipid conjugate technology. Chimerix is a development-stage biopharmaceutical company, dedicated to accelerating the advancement of innovative for patients living with cancer and other serious diseases. Its two clinical-stage development programs include dociparstat sodium (DSTAT) and brincidofovir (BCV). DSTAT, is a glycosaminoglycan derivative of heparin with known anti-inflammatory properties and BCV is an oral antiviral in development for the treatment of smallpox.

 2505 Meridian Pkwy Ste 100 Durham, NC,

https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.chimerix_inc.a1878daaef1b59d25a1d2e8876c4b4bf.html

Chimerix, Inc.’s key principal is Michael A Sherman. Chimerix, Inc. has 54 employees

https://wallmine.com/people/8557/michael-a-sherman

…..

Jay Portnoy, M.D.
Expertise: Consumer Representative (This the guy who is supposed to represent the interests of the Public.)
Professor of Pediatrics
Medical Director of Telemedicine Section of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, MO

Offices and Board of Directors:

American Board of Allergy & Immunology (ABAI). 2014-present.

Vice President, American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 2005-6.

Board of Directors, Black Healthcare Coalition. 2006-2009. [He is WHITE]

Editorships and Editorial Boards

Regional Editor, World Allergy Organization Journal. 2008 to 2012.

Section Editor, Annals of Allergy and Asthma. Appointed 2002 to 2005

Editor, Current Opinion on Allergy & Asthma. Issue on Pediatric Allergy. 2004 and 2005

Editor, Current Allergy and Asthma Reports. Issue on Pediatric Allergy. 2001-2013

Editorial Board, Allergy Watch. 1998-2001.

Editorial Board, Annals of Allergy and Asthma. 1994 to 2006

Editorial Board, Current Allergy Practice. 1993 to present

Other Appointments

FDA advisory panel (CBER), Allergenic Extracts.

2017-present FDA advisory panel (CDER). Respiratory and allergy drugs.

2010-present FDA advisory panel (CBER), Allergenic Extracts.

2005-2010 Special Emphasis Panel. T-cell Epitopes. NIAID. 2011.

https://www.fda.gov/media/105541/download

The guy has 151 papers mainly dealing with allergy so I am not going to look at all of them.

He seems to work with Environmental Allergens Workgroup. Also with American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology – “…a professional medical association of more than 6,000 allergist-immunologists and allied health professionals…” He is a Fellow, American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI) …. if you search long enough…. You find an AAAAI Legislative Action article urging Allergists to support Fauci’s funding.

NIAID, NIEHS, NHLBI, MCAN Workshop Report: The Indoor Environment and Childhood Asthma: Implications for Home Environmental Intervention in Asthma Prevention and Management

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), and Merck Childhood Asthma Network (MCAN) sponsored a joint workshop to discuss the current state of the science with respect to the indoor environment and its effects…

Adverse reactions to vaccines practice parameter 2012 update

…..Thus although patients with a history of mild reactions to egg ingestion (hives only) can receive their vaccine in a primary care provider’s office, those with a history of more severe reactions (cardiovascular, respiratory, or gastrointestinal symptoms) should receive the influenza vaccine in an allergist’s office. In both cases, personnel to recognize and equipment to treat anaphylaxis need to be immediately available, but the allergist’s office affords additional expertise in this area should it be required…..

…..There has been a great deal of additional information published over the past year demonstrating the safety of influenza vaccination in patients with egg allergy. Health care providers should no longer withhold the vaccine from any patient with egg allergy. In an update to recommendations made in the last year, it is now considered safe for patients even with a history of a severe egg allergy to receive influenza vaccination…..

No worries, we will revive you when you almost die of anaphylaxtic shock, it is utmost importance for us to jab you with a shot that is probably useless so we can get paid our bonus.
…..

Andrea Shane, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc.
Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Professor of Pediatrics
Director Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Emory University School of Medicine – Atlanta, GA

Joint appointment:
Assistant Professor of Global Health Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University 01 September 2013-present

Military or Government Service: Lieutenant Commander, United States Public Health Service, 2001-2003; Inactive Reserve Corps (IRC) 2003-until IRC dissolved in 2010.
……
The United States Public Health Service is a collection of agencies of the Department of Health and Human Services concerned with public health, containing eight out of the department’s eleven operating divisions. The Assistant Secretary for Health oversees the PHS.

WIKI

ALSO:

OASH oversees the Department’s key public health offices and programs, a number of Presidential and Secretarial advisory committees, 10 regional health offices across the nation, and the Office of the Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. https://www.hhs.gov/ash/index.html
……

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis working group, appointed member, 2009-until committee dissolved by CDC in 2011.

Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) National Global Public Health Committee (NGPHC), appointed member 2010-2013.

World Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (WSPID), Board Member and member of the Education Committee representing the Pediatric Infectious Disease Society (PIDS), appointed 2017; term through 2019.

[THIS IS WHERE SHE HAS A LOT OF POWER]
Manuscript reviewer:
American Journal of Infection Control, 2001-2003
Clinical Infectious Disease Journal, 2003-present
Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2003 – present
Pediatrics, 2006 – present
Journal of Pediatrics, 2006-present
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2003-present
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 2003 – present
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 2006 – present
Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal, 2006 – present
Neonatology, 2008 – 2010
Journal of American Medical Association, 2009 – present
JAMA Pediatrics, 2013 – present
Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 2013-present
Pediatric Research 2017-present
Clinical Therapeutics, 2017-present
Faculty of 1000 (f1000), Public Health and Epidemiology section, post publication peer review of publications, 2009 -2011. [WTF???]
Pediatric Infectious Disease section with creation of the section, 2011-2014.

Honors and Awards:
International exchange fellowship, Children’s Hospital at Montefiore and Beijing Children’s Hospital, Beijing, China October-November, 1999

Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Crisis Response Service Award, 2002

Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Outstanding Unit Citation, 2002

National Foundation for Infectious Diseases (NFID) Advanced Vaccinology Course Travel Grant to attend ADVAC 9, Annecy, France, 2008

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Special Recognition, H1N1 influenza research, 2010

Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Award for Excellence in Partnering-Domestic to NETEC (the National Ebola Training and Education Center)…. This award recognizes programs’ initiative and effectiveness through establishing and sustaining a strategic partnership with government, private sector, volunteer, or nonprofit organizations, 24 March 2016.

Contracts:

Co- investigator, NIH/NIAID/DMID Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU) – Emory University School of Medicine. Role: Site PI on rotavirus vaccine cross-over trial, DMID #08- 0017 and influenza vaccine to breastfeeding women trial, DMID#09-007; site co- investigator on other trials. Salary support, 01 August 2007- 01 August 2016….

………….

Paul Spearman, M.D.
Expertise: Pediatric & Infectious Diseases

Director, Division of Infectious Diseases
Albert B. Sabin Chair in Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Professor, Department of Pediatrics
University of Cincinnati School of Medicine Cincinnati, OH

This guy is a really big heavy weight. There is cross-over with the lady, Andrea Shane above. Any bets he pulled her in to be his ‘female puppet’ – a good little government soldier?

11/2005-09/2016: Professor and Division Director Nahmias-Schinazi Research Chair Pediatric Infectious Diseases Department of Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine
11/2005-09/2016: Associate Director for Pediatric Studies Emory Vaccine Center Atlanta, GA
03/2009-09/2016: Vice Chair for Research Department of Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine
03/2009-09/2016: Chief Research Officer Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta, GA

[Andrea L. Shane is Attending Pediatrician Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Emory Healthcare Grady Health 01 August 2006 – present ]

This guy has a full page of
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS:
a. National and International:


NIH Councils and Study Sections Chair, NIH ZRG1 AARR-E (41)
December 2016 Member, NIH ZRG1 AARR-P (02)
December 2016 Chair, NIH SEP: ZRG1 AARR-K (02)M; AIDS and related research SEP
August 2016 Chair, NCI Board of Scientific Counselors, Site Visit Team, Review of HIV DRP, Frederick, MD
July 2016 Chair, NIH SEP: ZDE1; Approaches to Eliminate HIV and Opportunistic Pathogens from Oral Reservoirs
November 2015 Chair, NIH SEP: ZRG1 AARR-E; AIDS and AIDS-related
July 2015 Chair, NIH SEP: Basic Research on HIV Persistence
March 2015 Chair, NIH/NIDCR Review Panel on HIV and Oral
March 2015 Opportunistic Pathogens
.
.
.

NIH/NIAID HIV Vaccine Trials Network
Protocol Chair, HVTN 088 Protocol 2010-present
Chair, Chiron/Novartis Products Development Team 2000-2007
Chair, Wyeth Products Development Team 2001-2007 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 049 Protocol 2002-2007 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 056 Protocol 2002-2006 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 061 Protocol 2003-2005 Member, HVTN Phase I-II Committee 2002-2005 Protocol
Chair, HVTN 088 Protocol 2010-present
NIH/NIAID/DMID Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit Co-Principal Investigator, Emory VTEU site 2007-present
Protocol Chair, VTEU 0008 Protocol 2009-2014
NIH/NICHD-Westat/NIAID IMPAACT Network Principal Investigator, Emory IMPAACT site 2014-present
.
.
.
CONSULTANTSHIPS:
Chiron, HIV Vaccines Development Team, Emeryville, CA 2003, 2004
Wyeth, HIV Vaccine Programs, Pearl River, NY 2003, 2004

EDITORSHIPS AND EDITORIAL BOARDS: [Again this is where a lot of power lies.]
Member of Editorial Board, Journal of Virology
Member of Editorial Board, Virology
Member of Editorial Board, Current HIV Research
Academic Editor, PLoS One

MANUSCRIPT REVIEWER: [There is that POWER again]
Journal of Virology (numerous, 1995-present)
Virology (numerous, 1998-present)
Current HIV Research (2001-present)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Biochemistry (2005, 2006)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Traffic (2005, 2006, 2007, 2013)
Ad Hoc reviewer, JAIDS (2004, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015)
Ad Hoc reviewer, JBC (1997-present)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Leukocyte Biol (2000)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Vaccine (2000-2016)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Virus Research (2005, 2012, 2012, 2013)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Nature Structural Biology (2005)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PLOs Medicine (2006, 2007, 2008)
Ad Hoc reviewer, J Mol Biol (2007,2012, 2015, 2016)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PNAS (2007, 2008, 2009,2012, 2013, 2014)
Ad Hoc reviewer, JCB (2007, 2008, 2010, 2011,2012, 2013)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PLOs One (2008, 2009, 2010,2011,2012, 2013, 2014) 6
Ad Hoc reviewer, Cell Host and Microbe (2008-present)
Ad Hoc reviewer, Nature Medicine (2009, 2011,2012, 2016)
Ad Hoc reviewer, PLOs Pathogens (2009-present) Ad Hoc reviewer, J Immunology (2010, 2011, 2013) Ad Hoc reviewer, Retrovirology (2011-present)
.
.
GRANT SUPPORT:
a. Active Support

  1. Federally funded:
    NIH R01 AI058828: Role of Vpu in HIV Particle Assembly. Funded since 2004, currently in no-cost extension with competing renewal under review.
    NIH R01 GM111027-17A1: Viral and Cellular Determinants of HIV-1 Assembly. Funded 9/16/2013-8/31/2017 (Principal Investigator). $200,000 initial period; $800,000 direct costs.
    NIH R01AI11863: Mucosal Protection against HIV Generated by PIV5 Priming and VLP Boosting. Funded 4/01/2014-8/31/2018 (Principal Investigator, Multiple PI grant). $351,366/yr.
  2. Private foundation funded:
    None presently.
  3. Industry Contracts:
    None presently

b. Previous Support:
NIH R01HL125042: HIV-induced Redox Stress and the Alveolar Macrophage as a Resistant Reservoir. Funded 7/01/2014-6/30/2018 (Principal Investigator, Multiple PI grant). $686,584/yr; relinquished upon relocation to Cincinnati.
NIH K12 HD072245: Atlanta Pediatric Scholars Program. Funded 04/01/2011-11/30/2016 (Program Director). $324,000/yr.
HHSN275201300003C: Westat/NICHD Contract- IMPAACT Network; Pediatric and Adolescent HIV/AIDS Research Program at Emory University. Funded 9/01/2014-8/31/2019 (Site Principal Investigator). $450,000/yr estimated.
NIAID-DMID-NIH AI2012144: Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units (VTEU). Funded 9/13/2013-9/12/2020. (Co-Principal Investigator). $4-5M/yr estimated. 8
NIH R21 AI098592: HIV-specific B cell repertoire in humans following cross-clade immunization. Funded 7/01/2012-6/30/2014 (Principal Investigator). $150,000 initial period; $275,000 direct costs.


NIH R01 AI090656: Broadly-reactive antibodies against chimeric virus-host antigens. Funded 06/14/2010-05/31/2014 (Co-investigator).

I wonder if he knows Ralph Baric??


NIH U01 AI069418: HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Unit. Funded 2/01/2007-11/30/2013 (Coinvestigator). HHS N272200800005C: Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units. Funded 11/01/07- 10/31/14 (Co-Director), $2,494,361/yr.
NIH U01AI78407 : Clonal Analysis of the Human B Cell Response to HIV. Funded 2/01/08-01/31/13 (Co-Investigator), $150,000/yr (Emory component); $750,000 total.
NIH RO1 AI40338: Viral and Cellular Determinants of HIV-1 Assembly. Funded since 1994; (Principal Investigator). $250,000 initial period; $1,150,000 total- now transitioned to GM111027 (active, above).
NIH R01 CA27834: Genetics of Primate “D” Type Retroviruses. Funded 09/24/07- 11/30/12 (Co-investigator), $250,000/yr, $1,250,000 total.
NIH R01 AI084834: Defining Neutralization Breadth in HIV-positive serum. Funded 9/01/2009-8/31/2011 (Principal Investigator), $250,000 initial period, $500,000 total.

NIH R21 AI65312: Pseudovirion Formation by Live Vector HIV Vaccines. Funded 06/01/2006-05/31/2008 (Principal Investigator), $150,000 initial period; $300,000 total.

NIH R01 AI067101: Novel Assays for Inhibitors of HIV Assembly. Funded 6/15/2005- 5/31/2008 (Principal Investigator), $200,000 initial period; $550,000 total.
NIH U01 AI47985: HIV Vaccine Trials Units. Funded 06/00-05/05. $1,438,628 initial period; $7,637,877 total.
NIH P30 AI054999: Vanderbilt-Meharry Developmental CFAR. Funded 05/01/03-04/30- 06 (Co-investigator), $528,468 initial period; $1,633,442 total.
NIH R29 AI40338-01A1: Membrane Binding and Transport of HIV-1 Pr55Gag. Funded 03/97-03/2002 (Principal Investigator). $ 70,000/ year; $350,000 total.
NIH R21 AI44369 (Innovation Grant): Development of Enhanced HIV-1 Pseudovirion Vaccines. Funded 07/99-06/01(Principal Investigator). $140,000/ year; $260,000 total.
NIH R55 CA83527-01A1: Induction of KSHV replication by HIV-1. Funded 03/00-02/02 (Principal Investigator). $80,000 total.
.
.
.
NIH R01 AI52007: Development of Enhanced HIV-1 Pseudovirion Vaccines. Funded 06/2002-05/2007 (Principal Investigator), $225,000 initial period, $1,125,000 total.

NAI113678, GlaxoSmithKline: An open-label, multicenter, single arm study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intravenous zanamavir in the treatment of hospitalized adult, adolescent, and pediatric subjects with confirmed influenza infection. Funded 10/02/12- 05/01/15. Principal Investigator.
P903-23, Cerexa: A multicenter, randomized, observer blinded, activ-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline vs. comparator in pediatric subjects with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Funded 01/01/2013-12/31/2014. Principal Investigator.
Merck Contract: Protocol 007: A Probe Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of a Three-dose Regimen of the Ad5 Gag Vaccine in Healthy Adults. Funded 04/01-12/02, $113,000 total (Principal Investigator).
Merck Contract: Protocol 012: A Probe Study of the Safety, tolerability, and Immunogenicity of the Ad5 HIV-1 Gag Vaccine. Funded 07/01/01-06/30/2003, $114,000 total (Principal Investigator).
Merck Contract: Protocol 016: A phase I dose-ranging study of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the Merck trivalent adenovirus serotype 5 HIV-1 gag/pol/nef vaccine in a prime-boost regimen in healthy adults. Funded 05/01/03-04/30/05, $117,000 total.
Basic Research Grant, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation: Pseudovirion formation by live vector HIV vaccines. Funded 03/01/02-02/28/2004, $180,000 total.
.
.

LECTURESHIPS, SEMINAR INVITATIONS, AND VISITING PROFESSORSHIPS:
.
.

  1. Invited speaker, Peking University Department of Biomedical Engineering, Beijing, May 2015: “HIV-1 replication in macrophages”
  2. Invited speaker, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Beijing, May 2015: “Intracellular trafficking of the HIV envelope glycoprotein”

…………

Geeta K. Swamy, M.D.
Expertise: Infectious Diseases

Senior Associate Dean Vice Chair for Research & Faculty Development
Associate Professor, ObGyn
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Duke University, Durham, NC

2004 – 2006 Duke University Associate Faculty Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Division of Clinical & Epidemiological Research

2009 – present Duke University Vaccine Trials Unit Investigator Duke Translational Research Institute Durham, NC

2010 – 2018 Duke University Director Duke Perinatal Research Center Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Durham, NC

2012 – present Duke University Associate Professor Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Durham, NC

2013 – present Duke University Human Vaccine Institute Investigator Durham, NC

2016 – 2017 Duke University Associate Dean for Regulatory Oversight & Research Initiatives in Clinical Research Durham, NC

Professional Awards and Special Recognition

2008 NIH Young Investigator Award Perinatal Research Society Meeting, Santa Fe, New Mexico
2010 NIH – NIAID Special Recognition for H1N1 pandemic
2013 and 2014 “Outstanding Reviewer” (Top 10%), Obstetrics and Gynecology
2014 “Outstanding Reviewer” for Vaccine

RESEARCH

Active Grants:
NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Units (MFMU) 4/7/11 – 3/31/21

NIH-NICHD (Swamy) Principal Investigator Participation as a clinical site in the NICHD sponsored MFMU Research Network to investigate treatment strategies for common yet unresolved obstetric conditions through large multicenter collaborative trials

Past Grants:
Health Works for Women, NIH Summer Research Fellowship, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, 1994

PiiiTCH Study-Prevention of Influenza in Infants by Immunization of Their Household Contacts (CDC, Walter) Co-Investigator

NIH-NIAID (HHSN272200800057C, Swamy) Duke Site Principal Investigator
Randomized, Double-Blind Trial on Safety & Immunogenicity of Inactivated Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in Pregnant Women

NIH-NIAID (HHSN272200800057C, Swamy) Duke Site Principal Investigator A Phase II Study in Pregnant Women to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Unadjuvanted Sanofi Pasteur H1N1 Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Administered at Two Dose Levels

GlaxoSmithKline (Swamy) Cost-effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy An epidemiological study to develop and validate a model for estimating the costs and outcomes related to seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy for both mothers and infants through age 6 months.

Charles Hammond Research Fund (Gray) Mentor Assessing Decision Making & Acceptance of H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Administered in a Research Setting In Pregnancy

CDC-NCIRD – 1U01IP000190-01 (Swamy) Principal Investigator Effectiveness of a Vaccination Program in the Community ObGyn Setting The main objective of this 2-year project is to conduct a clinic-based study to develop and assess the effectiveness of a vaccination program for adolescent and adult women in the community Ob/Gyn setting.

ACOG/Merck & Company Research Award on Immunization (Fortner/Swamy) Mentor/Principal Investigator Compliance with Vaccination in the Obstetrical Setting with Novel H1N1 and Seasonal Influenza Retrospective review of births occurring in Durham, North Carolina during the 2009-2010 influenza season to evaluate influenza vaccination practices during the novel H1N1 pandemic.

Charles Hammond Research Fund (Swamy) Principal Investigator Association of Circulating Mitochondrial DNA Content and Preterm Birth Among Black Mothers

NIH-NIAID (HHSN272200800057C, Swamy) Duke Site Principal Investigator A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial on the Safety and Immunogenicity of Seasonal 2010-2011 Inactivated Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in Pregnant Women
.
.
Vaccine & Treatment Evaluation Units 9/16/13 – 9/15/23
NIAID (HHSN272201300017I, Walter and Swamy)
Co- Principal Investigator Participation as a clinical site in the NIAID sponsored VTEU Network to conduct clinical trials of vaccine and treatments for infectious diseases

Contract PI for the following active trials
 A Phase I, Double-Blind, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of NTM-1632 vs Placebo Administered Intravenously in Healthy Adults

 Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Colonization and Disease Among Pregnant Women: A Historical Cohort Study

 A Phase I Cohort-Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial in Healthy Adults to Assess the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of a Monovalent Inactivated Influenza A/H5N8 Virus Vaccine Administered Intramuscularly at Different Dosages Given With or Without AS03 or MF59 Adjuvants: Assessment of Immunological Responses and Lymphocyte Interplay

 A Phase II, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of 5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel Administered Intravaginally for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis

 A Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Dose Escalation Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated West Nile Virus Vaccine, Hydro Vax-001, in Healthy Adults

 An Opportunistic Study to Evaluate the Population Pharmacokinetics of Beta-lactam Antibacterials in Adults Including Elderly Subjects (POPS_SILVER)

 A Population Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate Disposition of Azithromycin and Ertapenem in Pregnant Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery After Failed Labor (POPS_CAN_DO)

Targeted Reduction of Antibiotics Using Procalcitonin in a Multi-center, Randomized, DoubleBlinded, Placebo-Controlled Non-Inferiority Study of Azithromycin Treatment in Outpatient Adults with Suspect Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) and a Procalcitonin (PCT) Level of ≤0.25 ng/mL (TRAP-LRTI)

Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Group-Sequential Study to Determine the Immunogenicity and Safety of a RSV F Nanoparticle Vaccine with Aluminum in Healthy 3rd Trimester Pregnant Women; and Safety and Efficacy of Maternally Transferred Antibodies in Preventing RSV Disease in their Infants Novavax, Inc. (Swamy) 12/1/15 – 7/31/19

Principal Investigator Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) 9/29/15 – 9/28/18 Clinical Study of the Safety of Simultaneous Administration of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine (Tdap) and Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV) in Pregnant Women CDC (HHS200-2012-53663, Swamy) Principal Investigator
.
.
.
GlaxoSmithKline Speaker Services, 2009 – 2012

NIH-NIAID Division of Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Working Group on the Enrollment and Safety Assessments of Pregnant Women in Clinical Trials of Drugs and Vaccines, 2010 to 2015

National Vaccine Advisory Committee – Maternal Immunization Working Group – 2014 to 2016

Appointed Member, February 2017 to present
HPV Working Group, February – June 2018

Consultative Workshop on Immunology Research Gaps Related to Maternal Immunization – Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, May 25-26, 2015

WHO Brighton Collaboration Global Alignment of Immunization Safety Assessment in Pregnancy (GAIA) – Chair, Fetal Distress Working Group – 2015

Independent Data Monitoring Committee, GlaxoSmithKline, Inc. – RSV vaccines for the protection of children, 2015 to 2017

Data Safety Monitoring Board, Randomized Controlled Trial of Influenza Vaccine and Meningococcal Vaccine in Pregnant Malian Women and Their Infants Up To 6 Months of Age, Sponsor: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, 2011-2016

………….

Gregg Sylvester, M.D., M.P.H. +
Expertise: Alternate Industry Representative

Vice President – Medical Affairs
Seqirus Inc., Summit, NJ

Physician | Public Health Expert
Pharmaceutical Executive Expert in vaccine preventable diseases, pediatrics and population health.

Career Highlights
• Head of Medical Affairs for Seqirus, a CSL company
• Launched Pfizer’s Pediatric and Adult Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, as well as Meningococcal B vaccine in the USA
• Launched Merck’s HPV4 vaccine in over 100 countries, presented to numerous National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs), public health and medical societies
• Partnered with community organizations in Delaware to reduce infant mortality, teen pregnancy rates and HIV rates

Professional Experience
SEQIRUS, a CSL company Summit, N.J Vice President, Medical Affairs 2016 – present
• Responsible for the strategy and implementation of Medical Affairs plan
• Ensures appropriate use of Seqirus’ influenza vaccines
• Overseas Phase IV research and presents data to NITAGs and other key stakeholders.

PFIZER VACCINES Collegeville, Pa
Vice President, Medical and Scientific Affairs: Americas 2013 – 2016
• Spearheaded science-based rationale to preserve Prevnar 13 infant schedule in US recommendations
• Successfully achieved an adult Prevnar 13 recommendation from US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice
• Accelerated launch of groundbreaking Meningococcal B vaccine to accommodate urgent public health need

Global Head of Medical Affairs for Pediatric Vaccines 2010 – 2013
• Global Medical Lead for Pfizer’s Pediatric vaccine, Prevnar 13
• Created medical strategy for Prevnar 13, an asset exceeding over $5 billion in revenue
• Created innovate systems to improved scientific exchanges in a complex, global environment

MERCK VACCINES West Point, PA
Global Head of Medical Affairs for Adolescent Vaccines 2005 – 2010
• Created the medical affairs strategy for Merck’s HPV4 vaccine, Gardasil
• Spokesperson for all Merck vaccines
• Traveled extensively throughout the world presenting to governmental officials, regulatory agencies and public health/medical congresses

CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM Greenville, DE
Medical Director, Eugene DuPont Preventive Medicine & Rehabilitation Institute 2001 – 2005
• Led Preventive Medicine for Delaware’s largest health care organization
• Expanded the community-based health programs, serving more than 50,000 people/year

DELAWARE HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES New Castle, DE
Cabinet Secretary 1997 – 2001
• Reported directly to Governor of the State of Delaware
• Managed the largest state agency, with more than 5,000 employees and an operating budget of ~$1 billion
• Implemented Medicaid Managed Care and Children Health Insurance Program (sCHIP) in Delaware State

Health Officer 1995 – 1997
• Led Delaware’s Public Health Division
• Formulated Public Health policies and supervised programs addressing high infant mortality rates, teen pregnancy rates, and low childhood immunization rates
• Promoted to Cabinet Secretary within one year

Chief of Community Health & Director of Maternal & Child Health 1993 – 1995
• Directed the development and implementation of community-based public health programs for the state of Delaware
• Managed an annual budget of $30,000,000 and 330 public health professionals

Selected Board Positions
IMA World Health: Chairman of the Board: 2017-2018;
Board Member: 2013 – present

DONORS: The majority of IMA World Health’s projects are funded through grants from generous public funding agencies and foundations.
CORUS INTERNATIONAL
◦ IMA World Health | Corus World Health
◦ Lutheran World Relief
◦ CGA Technologies ==> https://www.cgatechnology.com/
◦ Ground Up Investing
◦ LWR Farmers Market Coffee

Selected Honors and Awards
Merck Global Human Health Awards – 2007 & 2006 Winner: Franchise of the Year; 2006 Winner: Best Support of International Markets and 2008, 2007 & 2006

Education & Training Fellowships:

  • Public Policy – Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation, assigned U.S. Senate, Washington, DC
  • Epidemic Intelligence Service – Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Atlanta, GA
  • General Preventive Medicine Resident – Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD
  • Pediatric Intern, Resident and Chief Resident – Children’s Hospital of Buffalo – State University of New York at Buffalo School of Medicine, Buffalo, NY
  • Master of Public Health – Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore,
  • MD Doctor of Medicine – Albany Medical College, Albany, NY
  • Bachelor of Arts – (History) – Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY
  • Veteran Status Commissioned Officer, United States Public Health Service: Rank – Commander – 1990 -1993

Summary

These are the people who have no problem giving an unvetted vaccine to children and pregnant women before the safety data is available. After all, they have been doing it on a smaller scale most of their careers.

-Gail Combs

GC/wm (written/edited)

Five Fast Omicron Facts You Can Send to Your Friends, Neighbors and Doctors

This is a quick update that is almost entirely GOOD NEWS, and that needs to SPREAD AROUND LIKE WILDFIRE – just like OMICRON.

I will try to be brief and only comment as needed.

1 – A Case of Omicron Treated With HCQ

Remember that case of COVID treated with ivermectin, that was published as a video, and which I basically transcribed for the readers here?

A Seven-Day Journey Through COVID-19 in Seven Minutes, Treated with Ivermectin

This is a great selfie video, done by a young lady with a glorious Southern accent, chronicling her week of COVID-19 and recovery, treated with ivermectin. It’s short – just under 7 minutes – but it captures a lot of information about symptoms and relief by the drug. I can’t embed the video here due …

I think it’s really helpful for people to see and hear the reality of an individual COVID case, to see what to expect. This kind of information can absolutely reduce unnecessary fears. It’s a real service, IMO.

Well, Omicron is here, and it got here VERY fast (more later). THANKFULLY, somebody who GOT IT took extremely good notes, and put them online.

Specifically, a medical doctor, Dr. Henry Smith, Jr., who has published on American Thinker, got the disease, treated it with hydroxychloroquine, and recovered VERY nicely.

His account of the disease is MUST READ material. It’s short – no excuses!

Plus, he’s a photographer, and has lots of nice pictures on his site.

LINK: https://henrysmithscottage.com/viral-post-december-23-2021-my-omicron-infection/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/Jm60C

No preview! Please visit his site. I left a comment there, letting him know about antihistamines, because this is something that can get past the “pharmacy gestapo” that Biden and CDC have created.

As Steve has noted here, the 2X dosage of modern, 2nd-gen antihistamines is quite safe, and his own doctor prescribed 4X dosages. This is completely analogous to doctor’s prescription of ibuprofen at 800 mg, which is 4X the OTC 1-pill dose.

I know that ivermectin is “all the rage”, but hydroxychloroquine is still an excellent drug to treat COVID, and I think it’s great to see it in use here. As I recently noted, I believe that none other than Bill Gates was behind the “take-down” of HCQ in the medical literature, via funding of studies designed to knee-cap it.

Dr. Smith comes to FIVE conclusions about Omicron, 3 being numbered, and 2 bonus thoughts after those, made post-illness, all of which I find excellent and agreeable. Please visit his post to see what they are.

OH – and his American Thinker article – a short but powerful post on the OBVIOUSNESS of the solution – natural immunity – entitled “Who Isn’t Getting Infected?”, is definitely worth reading as well.

LINK: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/12/who_isnt_getting_infected.html

It is absolutely wonderful to see doctors standing up to CDC myopia (or worse) now!

Hat tip to GA/FL for this tip!!!

2 – Graphic Views of Omicron Displacing Delta

The graph above – if you know how to read it right – is absolutely STUNNING.

The graph above is North America.

The graph is a screen capture from NextStrain, which keeps track of virus variants globally.

LINK: https://nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/global

What this graph shows, is NOT “itty bitty” Omicron (red) sneaking up on “big old” Delta (turquoise).

It shows – at the extreme right edge – Omicron SQUASHING the Delta empire like a BUG. At the very edge, Delta basically STOPS – as Omicron keeps moving to the right.

Let’s look at an earlier screen capture from NextStrain. This one is GLOBAL, on December 4.

Here, you see the same thing I described above, but you see it earlier, because it took a while for the variant to travel to America, where it would displace Delta. The GLOBAL data is already showing Delta getting walloped.

From this, you can tell that I just missed Omicron. I had Delta with Day 0 (first symptoms) on November 26, and was likely infected on November 22 (yeah, not a good day). Everything in America was still DELTA at that time.

This is more easily seen in another graph. Source HERE at CDC.

LINK: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions

Sadly, the current graphics will not archive properly.

As you can see, on 11/27/2021 in the United States, it was ALL DELTA. On 12/4, It was still almost all Delta. By 12/11, the United States was at over 10% Omicron, But ONE WEEK later, on 12/18, the USA was at

70% Omicron.

This is just INSTANT-FREAKIN’-TANEOUS.

Will it hit 100% Omicron?

Does it HAVE TO hit 100% Omicron to wipe out the nastier Delta?

Stay tuned….. for the next item.

3 – The Decline and Fall of the Omicron Variant

Hat tip to RF121 for this video, in which a South African engineering geek and university researcher, Pieter Streicher, who tracks and predicts COVID numbers, tells us what is going to happen to the Omicron variant, and is ALREADY happening in one of the “origin towns” in South Africa, where it is PAST THE PEAK.

I really recommend listening to this, because I am just grabbing a few things that caught my fancy. There is much, much more.

Streicher predicts that Omicron will PEAK and then DECLINE, leaving ultimately around 20% infected and recovered, maybe 30% tops.

It will NOT be a majority of the population.

Here is how Streicher’s predictions have been working so far:

Now – why would I trust this guy – and NOT the Imperial College guy who Bill Gates promoted?

YOU KNOW…..

THIS GUY.

Yeah, the guy who ignored his own lockdowns from dodgy overblown models, so he could do the old pokerino with another “damn near model”, Little Mrs. Rubylips, his married British intelligence handler mistress.

Well, Neil Ferguson’s predictions turned out to be WILDLY overblown.

Streicher, on the other hand, whose predicted curves and actual numbers you can see above, is predicting – at the PEAKS….

25-fold LOWER deaths for Omicron relative to Delta, and…..

6-fold LOWER ventilated hospital beds for Omicron vs. Delta.

SO – Untreated Omicron is NOT exactly free of risk, and we still need hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin to treat it.

AND – failing availability of those things, we need antihistamines and azithromycin – the Spanish protocol – implement widely, as I discussed earlier…..

The Zyrtec Rebellion

Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …

And if you doubt the utility of antihistamines against ALL variants of SARS-CoV-2, then you need the NEXT item to convince you otherwise.

4 – An Independent Discovery and Validation of Antihistamine Therapy for COVID-19 *and* for Both Long COVID and Genetic Vaccine Major Adverse Effects

THIS is worth getting the word out to doctors quickly. Hat tip to Gail Combs for bringing this critical video to my attention.

The antihistamine therapy for COVID-19 was independently discovered by a South African doctor, Dr. Shankara Chetty. Even more importantly, the doctor discovered the reasoning behind the therapy, and its applicability to both “long COVID” and vaccine side effects as well.

His REASONING is extremely convincing, and well-explained in the video.

This is a brilliant universal theory of severe COVID, long COVID, and vaccine side effects, which meshes quite perfectly with almost everything we know about SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.

Thus, we now have a universally available, over-the-counter treatment protocol for BOTH COVID and COVID vaccination side effects, the former of which was found to be 100% successful in TWO real-world studies, and which cannot be stopped by Fauci-controlled pharmacists or Gates-funded anti-studies.

This video is brilliant, because it really demonstrates how science is done, at the practicing level. A doctor and scientist, using observation and logic, figured out the antihistamine protocol BY REASONING FROM SYMPTOMS, rather than by observation of antihistamines as an accidentally useful therapy. Nevertheless, both independent discoveries confirm each other.

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LvZDx6gzbJeR/

LINK: https://youtu.be/0tgvE6fuWXY

Dr. Shankara Chetty used a very old FIRST-GENERATION antihistamine, promethazine, as his drug of treatment.

Based on this, our own group’s prediction that Benadryl – another first-generation antihistamine – would also work, is almost certainly correct.

I think this is a critical video for every doctor to watch. In fact, this might be a good one to send to YOUR doctor!

5 – Omicron Infection Amplifies Neutralizing Antibody Response To Delta Variant

Well, count this as good news. Hat tip to RF121 for tipping us to this one.

First on Twitter:

LINK: https://sigallab.net/

LINK: https://secureservercdn.net/50.62.198.70/1mx.c5c.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/MEDRXIV-2021-268439v1-Sigal.pdf

Check out some further tweets from Alex Sigal.

Here is the abstract of the preprint.

Omicron has been shown to be highly transmissible and have extensive evasion of neutralizing antibody immunity elicited by vaccination and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Omicron infections are rapidly expanding worldwide often in the face of high levels of Delta infections. Here we characterized developing immunity to Omicron and investigated whether neutralizing immunity elicited by Omicron also enhances neutralizing immunity of the Delta variant. We enrolled both previously vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the Omicron infection wave in South Africa soon after symptom onset. We then measured their ability to neutralize both Omicron and Delta virus at enrollment versus a median of 14 days after enrollment. Neutralization of Omicron increased 14-fold over this time, showing a developing antibody response to the variant. Importantly, there was an enhancement of Delta virus neutralization, which increased 4.4-fold. The increase in Delta variant neutralization in individuals infected with Omicron may result in decreased ability of Delta to re-infect those individuals. Along with emerging data indicating that Omicron, at this time in the pandemic, is less pathogenic than Delta, such an outcome may have positive implications in terms of decreasing the Covid-19 burden of severe disease.

Here are the critical points:

Importantly, there was an enhancement of Delta virus neutralization, which increased 4.4-fold.

The increase in Delta variant neutralization in individuals infected with Omicron may result in decreased ability of Delta to re-infect those individuals.

IMO, this is good news for people who are infected by Omicron. It is very likely that Omicron offers some real protection against Delta.

The degree of protection against Delta is roughly a THIRD of the degree of protection against Omicron itself which is afforded by infection with Omicron (4.4-fold vs. 14-fold). That’s still ballpark. Probably comparable to a Delta-specific vaccine.

Not bad at all, IMO. We’ll just have to see how real-world data pan out.

That’s all for now, but stay tuned.

Because YES – there’s MOAR.

W

John Fink, James Coburn, and Jennifer O’Neill having a meal in a scene from the film ‘The Carey Treatment’, 1972. (Photo by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Getty Images)

The Clot Shot, The Explanation Thereof, And The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand

I. The Clot Shot

First things first.

Nobody would be calling ALL of the various full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein vaccines “the clot shot” if there weren’t some clear and obvious problems with the full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein ITSELF.

We already know that clotting dysfunction is key to COVID-19 pathogenicity. SO – it’s not exactly a surprise that the spike protein itself, and likewise the S1 subunit of that protein – a.k.a. THE BUSINESS END – are themselves pathogenic.

EXAMPLE:

Spike Protein S1 Subunit as Direct Lung Pathogen

LINK 1: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34156871/

LINK 2: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384477/

In the above example, the S1 subunit of the spike protein was basically 100% lethal to humanized mice when applied to their lungs.

And when they looked at the mice, the damage was basically the same as the damage from COVID-19.

Just sayin’.

So let me now TEST you, and see if you’re more of a scientist than Fauci’s protege Rochelle Alinsky – WHOOPS – I mean Rochelle Walensky – who heads the CDC for Fauci to maintain control of it.

If you give a SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE to somebody, and they have symptoms of COVID-19 during the next few days, or even during the next two weeks, which scenario is more likely?

(A) – The person just happened to get real COVID-19, and THAT spike protein did BAD THINGS.

(B) – The spike protein you put inside the person did BAD THINGS.

Do you see how science works?

It’s a lot like common sense, only it’s applied to fancy stuff.

I want you to meet some great scientists here. These are people with very little scientific authority, but they simply practiced science, instead of repeating what authorities told them.

(1) – The CNA who would not accept “super-spreader” myths

This guy was one of the first people to administer the Pfizer vaccine to nursing home residents.

He was shocked that his nursing home residents would die shortly after being vaccinated – after having survived for months BEFORE the vaccine – in a way that was clearly related to their being vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine.

Nursing home management would NOT admit to the obvious connection – and created a mythical “super-spreader” to explain the deaths.

This man is a HERO.

The first 10 minutes of the video is this man working up the courage of conscience – to SPEAK THE TRUTH. If you just want to hear what he needed to say, you can jump to 10 minutes and you will hear the SCIENCE.

LINK 1: https://rumble.com/vdaicp-cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-inj.html

LINK 2: https://www.bitchute.com/video/cpQ7dnqu0Sos/

LINK 3: https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-injections-speak-out/

LINK 4: https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-injections-speak-out/

(2) – From Physician’s Assistant to VAERS Whistleblower

This lady, a hospital physician’s assistant, started out as a “COVID training true believer”, but she began observing what the shots were doing in her hospital. From there, she began encountering resistance to “doing the right thing”.

Now, in retrospect, you can see everybody in the system avoiding responsibility – not just for the problem, but for even reporting it.

A fantastic interview by Del Bigtree’s Highwire show.

LINK 1: https://thehighwire.com/videos/these-patients-deserve-to-be-heard-vaers-whistleblower/

LINK 2: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/17/physicians-asst-whistleblower-reveals-hospital-intake-with-90-percent-vaccinated-patients-and-hospital-administration-refusing-to-report-adverse-events/

(3) – Doctor Discovers Disseminated Clotting in Most Vaccinated Patients

We covered this just recently, HERE.

Dr. Charles Hoffe’s Observation of Spike Protein mRNA Vaccine-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension

This doctor discovered not only that “the jab” was leading to loss of wind (reduced effort tolerance) in too many of his patients – a whopping 62% of all his patients were showing signs of microscopic clotting – similar to COVID-19 – after vaccination.

LINK:  https(colon)//www.bitchute(dot)com/video/A6GbcUl6blpJ/

Bibliography of our own Spike Protein Suspicions

Now – this site has also not been negligent in reporting on the problems of the “clot shot”, as you can see from the following bibliography.

Are Clotting Problems a General Minor Risk of COVID Vaccines?
Is The Abortion Vaccine Right For You?
Keeping COVID Shot Transfer Out Of Your Life
Five* Studies Showing the Potential or Actual Superiority of Disease-Conferred Immunity in COVID-19
How Vaccine Addiction Slavery Works
They’re Nazis
Interview With A Victim of Jab-Haul COVID
Spike Protein = Spike Protein ≈ Snake Protein
The Spike Protein’s Purpose Betrayed By Its Own Superiority
Dr. Charles Hoffe’s Observation of Spike Protein mRNA Vaccine-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension
Why All People Must Refuse mRNA Vaccines to End the Worldwide Gain of Function Experiment

Thus, you will see that we were READY when a good explanation of the clot shot arose.

II. The Explanation

I want to start by thanking barkerjim for posting a comment with a link that leads to a very recent paper (pre-peer-review, of course) that explains the clot shot. He found the link HERE on Denninger’s Market Ticker site.

The order of the finding:

Denninger Comment: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=3724148

Q Tree Comment: https://www.theqtree.com/2021/10/18/dear-kmag-20211018-joe-biden-didnt-win-%e2%9d%80-open-topic/comment-page-2/#comment-816737

Ecosophia Comment: https://ecosophia.dreamwidth.org/152821.html?thread=20225013#cmt20225013

Preprint Paper: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.12.464152v1.full.pdf

I will include the entirety of the anonymous comment on the Ecosophy blog.

Spike Protein Clotting Mechanism

Date: 2021-10-14 06:10 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Preprint posted today. This is potentially a bombshell paper.

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces abnormal inflammatory blood clots neutralized by fibrin immunotherapy

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.12.464152v1.full.pdf

“Here we report that the Spike protein from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) binds to the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and induces structurally abnormal blood clots with heightened proinflammatory activity. SARS-CoV-2 Spike virions enhanced fibrin-mediated microglia activation and induced fibrinogen-dependent lung pathology. COVID-19 patients had fibrin autoantibodies that persisted long after acute infection.”

“The central structural component of blood clots, and a key regulator of inflammation in disease, is insoluble fibrin, which is derived from the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and is deposited in tissues at sites of vascular damage (10, 11). Hypercoagulability in COVID-19 is associated with inflammation and the formation of fibrin clots resistant to degradation despite adequate anticoagulation (3-5). Extensive fibrin deposits are detected locally in inflamed lung and brain tissues from COVID-19 patients, sometimes without evidence of direct viral infection at autopsy (1, 8, 12-14). The high prevalence of thrombotic events with these unique hypercoagulability features suggests an as yet unknown mechanism of abnormal blood clot formation in COVID-19. We set out to determine how blood clots form in COVID-19 and to identify therapies to combat the deleterious effects of abnormal coagulation occurring in acute and convalescent stages of disease.”

“Since hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients has features distinct from those of other inflammatory diseases, we hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 directly affects the structural and functional properties of blood clots. Incubation of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant trimeric spike protein (Spike) with healthy donor plasma increased fibrin polymerization (Fig. 1A). Spike strikingly altered the fibrin clot structure resulting in thinner fibers with a rough appearance and increased clot density as shown by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Fig. 1B, fig. S1), identifying direct effects of SARS-CoV-2 Spike on fibrin clot architecture. Consistent with these structural changes, a solid-phase binding assay revealed binding of Spike to both fibrinogen and fibrin (Kd 5.3 μM and 0.4 μM, respectively) (Fig. 1C). Fibrinogen immunoprecipitated with full-length recombinant trimeric Spike, and studies with deletion mutants identified an interaction with the S2 domain of Spike (Fig. 1D, fig. S2).”

“Intravenous administration of Spike PVs in wild-type (WT) mice induced extensive fibrin deposition in the lung (Fig. 2A). (…) Fibrin deposition was associated with activated endothelium in the lung, and gene expression analysis revealed increased expression of endothelial and inflammatory markers in Spike PV-injected mice (…) consistent with findings of SARS-CoV-2 toxicity to endothelial cells (19). (…) Mice genetically-deficient in fibrinogen (Fgα–/– mice), which express all other blood proteins except fibrinogen and are protected from autoimmune and inflammatory conditions (11), did not exhibit lung pathology following Spike PV challenge (Fig. 2E, fig. S5).”

“Fibrinogen is causally linked to the activation of macrophages and microglia in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in the brain and periphery (11, 21). Fibrin is a driver of microglia-induced cognitive dysfunction (22) and is associated with perivascular-activated microglia and macrophages in brains of COVID-19 patients even without signs of infection (12).”

“A surge of autoantibody production against diverse immune targets have been detected in COVID-19 patients (25). To determine whether COVID-19 patients develop autoantibodies
against abnormal blood clots, we tested autoantibody responses to fibrin. (…) We tested longitudinally collected serum samples ranging from acute to convalescent disease stages from 54 COVID-19 asymptomatic, mild, and severe disease patients requiring
admission to the intensive care units (table S3). Fibrin autoantibodies were abundant in all three groups of COVID-19 patients and persisted during the convalescent stage, but were scarce in healthy donor controls or in subjects with non-COVID respiratory illnesses (Fig. 4A, B).”

“In summary, we find that SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein enhances the formation of highly
inflammatory clots that are neutralized by a fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody. Our data shed
new light on the enigmatic coagulopathy found in COVID-19 revealing a causal role for fibrinogen
in thromboinflammation – even independent of active viral replication. The high incidence of clotting complications in COVID-19 has been attributed to systemic inflammation (3), vascular damage including abnormal levels of circulating coagulation proteins (1, 26), genetic susceptibility to tissue factor and complement genes (27), and prothrombotic autoantibodies (28). Our findings now show that coagulopathy is not merely a consequence of inflammation. Rather, the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 Spike with fibrinogen and fibrin results in abnormal blood clot formation that in turn drives inflammation.”

[ THIS HERE IS THE PART TO READ ]

Assuming the results are correct – and I can see little reason to doubt them though replication is always important – this really starts to put the puzzle pieces together. I’m frankly amazed that it took so long to figure this out.

In less-scientific language:

1. The spike protein binds directly to fibrinogen, the protein precursor of fibrin which forms blood clots.

2. This binding causes the fibrinogen to polymerize to form fibrin strands, thus forming clots.

3. Spike binding to fibrin in clots also changes the clot structure and renders it resistant to degradation.

4. Fibrin induces immune inflammation. This is usually adaptive because clotting occurs at sites of injury. It is dangerous when it occurs in response to diffuse and extensive spike-mediated micro-clotting. This helps to explain the runaway immune-mediated inflammatory response characteristic of severe Covid-19.

5. Spike *alone* (in the absence of an infectious virus) induces fibrin deposition and inflammation in the lungs of mice. However, mice lacking the gene for fibrinogen exhibited no pathology upon spike exposure, demonstrating that the fibrinogen-spike interaction is necessary and sufficient for spike-induced pathology.

6. Fibrin induces cognitive dysfunction via immune inflammation in the brain.

7. Many recovered Covid-19 patients have abundant autoantibodies against fibrin – independent of disease severity – while these autoantibodies are rare in unexposed people. This indicates both that spike-mediated fibrin formation is occurring in the course of actual human infection, and that autoreactive antibodies are formed which may play a role in chronic/long-haul symptoms or prolonged clotting problems.

8. A fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody greatly reduced inflammation, suggesting a potential new route for disease treatment.

The paper never uses the word “vaccine” – a glaring and clearly intentional omission – but it should be obvious based on these findings that instructing the body to produce large amounts of spike protein on multiple occasions is a dangerous prospect, and it also explains those autopsy revelations of bodies full of clots.

One caveat: The coordinating author is working with a start-up company to develop treatments based on reducing fibrin-mediated inflammation, so there is clearly some commercial interest here that could be influencing objectivity. On the other hand, it is often the entrepreneurial think-outside-the-box types who end up making groundbreaking discoveries.

Mark L

[ BOOM!!! ]

This is AMAZING and powerful work.

Remember that scientific paper that we started this article with?

NOW we know exactly how that happens. See how the SCIENCE is all connecting together?

The commenter on Ecosophia makes TWO critical points.

POINT ONE is that vaccines are never mentioned. That is how this work will eventually be published. The Rochelle Alinsky CDC could STOP the paper as potentially causing “vaccine hesitancy” if the authors mentioned vaccines, but by throwing no stones, none bounce back.

The CDC will still likely DELAY this from being published for as long as they can. But by avoiding mention of vaccines, the paper cannot be scuttled on the grounds that it “might cause vaccine hesitancy”, which is the FALSE IMPERATIVE that the CDC socialists use to control science and force vaccines on us as a social sabotage. Instead, the READER can make the connections and understand the implications for vaccines.

Do you see why PREPUBLICATION COMMUNICATIONS (like this one) are now so important?

POINT TWO is that it’s JUST THE SPIKE PROTEIN – NOT THE VIRUS AS A WHOLE – that causes the problems. And it’s been PROVEN. And it’s been PROVEN that THIS is the mechanism of the problems induced by the spike protein.

The moniker of “CLOT SHOT” is literally proven to be correct.

This is a BOMBSHELL because it indicts the entire concept of full-length spike protein vaccines as fundamentally flawed. It indicts mRNA vaccines as even more flawed than antigen, because the amount of toxic spike protein is unregulated. (Notice that I’ve been saying this all along.) It doesn’t necessarily say that other types of vaccines (like RBD subunit antigen vaccines) are any safer than spike protein antigen vaccines, but they MIGHT BE.

Something even BETTER here, than just the fibrinogen mechanism, is the way that this EXPLAINS (point 4 above) what one nurse practitioner observed – that COVID strikes PRE-EXISTING INFLAMMATION. Both the WHY of some people having severe COVID and others not, and the LOCATION of those issues, is explained by fibrin’s ties to pre-existing inflammation. We now have a mechanism which we already know follows that rule, because that’s how fibrin works.

This also explains why antihistamines work to save people from severe COVID. Antihistamines are generally useful against severe inflammation by pathogenic substances which cause inflammatory reactions. It’s why they administer benadryl as a general emergency antiinflammatory for purposes like anaphylaxis prevention.

The Zyrtec Rebellion

Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …

And yet the CDC has WARNED people against taking antihistamines with the vaccine – when this work LITERALLY PROVES WHY THAT IS A GOOD STRATEGY – just as it is a good strategy to take antihistamines to protect against severe COVID.

Like I said, this study proves THAT we were right, and WHY we were right.

And why is CDC so WRONG – time and time again?

This is a breaker of logjams. The insistence on the use of a fundamentally flawed vaccine is CRIMINAL.

Mandates are bad enough, but over a vaccine, the very principle of which is scientifically proven as DANGEROUS?

If mandates continue, these people need to be in JAIL. If they RESIST, they need to be OVERTHROWN.

In short, THIS.

https://twitter.com/TheJuggernaut88/status/1450593202050715655

Mandating this fundamentally dangerous vaccine is so wrong on so many levels.

This is a EUGENIC VACCINE if there ever was one. It’s almost DESIGNED to finish off people who are not 100% healthy.

How can this be right? Seriously. How can this be right?

We can no longer tolerate these people who pretend not to know.

III. The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand

I start this section by thanking three people – Sundance, Aubergine, and Trumpismine – who helped me to see what is going on here.

SUNDANCE informed me of the “Mamet Principle” – that liberals pretend not to know things

AUBERGINE formulated her wonderful Razor – that it is dangerous to dismiss such pretense as mere stupidity, when it might be the product of malice or guile.

TRUMPISMINE turned me on to the Wikipedia definition of Lysenkoism, which contained enough detail that I was able to connect the goals of old Lysenkoism to the actions of the left today.

The so-called Mamet Principle is a paraphrase of a repeated point by David Mamet, which Sundance encapsulated as a principle. This has been discussed and exemplified many times, both here and on CTH.

In asking WHY liberals “pretend not to know things”, we now understand that Hanlon’s Razor is an EXCUSE – that it’s COVER – and that it’s NOT because they’re STUPID, but rather because they’re smart and evil.

The best and most concise description is a reworking of Hanlon’s Razor by our own Aubergine.

So what if we apply this to Saint Fauci of Antibodies?

Anthony Fauci has a literal MAGICIAN’S POWER to make people focus on the WRONG THING. His skills of EVASION are absolutely outstanding. I love to call it “antibody hypnosis”, because that is exactly what it seems like.

“YOU WILL LOOK AT THE ANTIBODIES. THE ANTIBODIES WILL SAVE YOU. LOOK ONLY AT THE ANTIBODIES. YOU ARE FEELING WARM. YOU ARE FEELING SAFE. YOU ARE HAPPY ABOUT THE ANTIBODIES. THE MORE ANTIBODIES YOU SEE, THE WARMER YOU FEEL – LIKE THE SUN ON YOUR FACE ON A BEACH.”

You even hear his voice when you read that – don’t you? That gravelly, reassuring voice.

It’s VERY intentional.

Focusing on ONE WRONG THING – or even ONE RIGHT THING – is a technique of misdirection, but it is one of the BEST ways of pretending not to know things.

“Let’s only talk about this.”

Rand Paul knows all about it. He has gone many rounds with the Fauci critter.

But it’s not just Fauci.

His protege in CDC, who gives Fauci effective control of medical science, is every bit as bad.

It even includes Rand Paul’s colleagues in Congress.

The man behind the launch of censorship. Is this guy even AMERICAN?

What a PUTZ.

ANYWAY, this is where I started to figure things out.

This WEIRD LOVE of the radical left for brutal, aggressive, stupid, uncaring science – where does it come from?

I did not expect the answer that I found, with the help of Trumpismine and Wikipedia.

Lysenkoism

LINK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

It’s very helpful to read this, including this part:

Marxism–Leninism postulated “universal and immutable laws of history” (historical materialism and dialectical materialism), which assumed unavoidable large-scale change at the collective level of societies.[5]Collectivism was a key feature of Marxism; Darwin’s concept of a random mutation in an individual being able to propagate and transform subsequent generations was at odds with the ideology, and was perceived as having a strong liberal inclination.[6] Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]

Most people brought up in mainstream, establishment, Western science use the term Lysenkoism without really understanding the political angle of it. We understand it merely as “politics being imposed on scientists in the Soviet Union, which set back Soviet biological science by decades.”

Yes, that’s true, but it’s not ALL of the truth. The more you know about it, the more it looks EXACTLY like “Woke Science”.

As an aside, clearly it makes sense WHY China (and to a lesser extent Russia) would want to promote Lysenkoism in the United States, as part of their own interests. “China First” and “Russia First” by socialist and ex-socialist means are unlikely to be pretty. “Fuck the other guy up so he can’t win” is a valid technique in a corrupt world.

But it goes deeper.

Lysenkoism is far less about being STUPID, than about being REVOLUTIONARY. That is a critical idea. That quality of being revolutionary makes mistakes, and when it does, it’s generally STUPID. But when it does NOT make mistakes, it’s generally EVIL.

Let me repeat what I said, earlier about Lysenkoism.

[QUOTE]

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Online Admin Coyote Reply to  trumpismine October 18, 2021 02:36

This is EXCELLENT READING!!!

You know what? This is actually really interesting reading.

In a WEIRD WAY – Lysenko was “right”, in that he maniacally predicted EXACTLY what the communists are doing NOW with gene therapy. His assertion of a “genetic dialectic” – of the “evolutionary” in conflict with the “revolutionary” – is actually what we’re seeing RIGHT NOW with the “natural evolution” crowd (US) versus the commie-forced gene therapy crowd (THEM).

Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]

It was just total hubris and pathological commie science – a lot like what we see from Fauci, Gates and Walensky – but it “anticipated” what WOULD come eventually through science – that someday WE would have the power to do the things – and make the mistakes – that we are making now.

So in many ways these people ARE the intellectual inheritors of Lysenkoism!!!

Lysenko’s mistake was claiming that things WERE what they merely COULD BE through greater understanding.

Imagine some person coming BEFORE Galileo and trying to FORCE heliocentrism in their country – killing, jailing, ousting, and attacking the geocentrists.

In a sense, that was Lysenko, who attacked natural evolution.

Natural processes are “evolution”.

Genetic modification is “revolution”.

The dude was a NUT, trying to assert that the NATURAL was both, when it’s almost all ONE. But if he would have simply said “We must become revolutionary in genetics, which is merely evolutionary now”, then he would have been like the Lenin of biology, and he would likely be admired today by all these crazy leftists and depoppers, instead of an old Soviet embarrassment.

But ALL OF THAT comes back and tells me that these people are the modern recapitulation of Lysenkoist THOUGHT, but using the GAINS of actual evolutionary understanding.

The nutbaggery we see NOW with the communist jab-maniacs, is just like Lysenko’s assertions, only MORE REAL because they have MORE TECH.

[END QUOTE]

Soviet science, and Lysenko in particular, were characterized by a kind of VIRTUE SIGNALING, and that is what we are seeing now on universities, only it tends to be about peripheral things, like race, diversity, gender – whatever is in leftist vogue.

But NOW, in our phony socialist “pandemic”, we are seeing the virtue signals rise to levels that affect the practice of science itself. It’s starting at GOALS, but very soon, it will get a bit like CLIMATE LYSENKOISM, where people CHANGE DATA, HIDE DATA, DROP EVIDENCE, and basically act like MAINSTREAM MEDIA JOURNALISTS, who are in a continuous state of covering things up by omission, distraction, and promotion of contradicting narratives.

That is NOT GOOD.

I think that we are now seeing with publications like the one featured in this article, is some PUSH-BACK by scientists who realize where things are headed – a VERY BAD place. They are GETTING THE TRUTH OUT.

We need to help promote awareness of science that CDC and the communist infiltration are going to hide.

W

On August 7, 1948, at the end of a week-long session organised by Lysenko and approved by Stalin,[14] the V.I. Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences announced that from that point on Lysenkoism would be taught as “the only correct theory.” Soviet scientists were forced to denounce any work that contradicted Lysenko.[19] Criticism of Lysenko was denounced as “bourgeois” or “fascist,” and analogous “non-bourgeois” theories also flourished in other fields such as linguistics and art in the Soviet academy at this time. Perhaps the only opponents of Lysenkoism during Stalin’s lifetime to escape liquidation were from the small community of Soviet nuclear physicists: as Tony Judt has observed, “It is significant that Stalin left his nuclear physicists alone and never presumed to second guess their calculations. Stalin may well have been mad but he was not stupid.”[20]

Faucism-Lysenkoism is real. And it’s HERE.