“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
Between the BIDENISTA commies and the BIDENAZI fascists – all of them kowtowing to the Atlantic Council and the WEF globonazis, we’re in for a RIDE.
SCREW YOU, ADOLPH!!!
MOOD MUSIC – LAUGHING!
Know about any “secret treaties”, China Joe?
NOW, they have decided that it’s all-out war against those horrible, terrible, no-good, door-opening, hat-tipping, school-board-confronting “MAGA Republicans“.
What a bunch of WEINIES.
The MAGA agenda represents an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our Republic.
It doesn’t respect our Constitution. It doesn’t believe in the rule of law. And it doesn’t recognize the will of the people.
They DESCRIBE THEMSELVES. Projection at its finest.
Here is a serious take on it – and I do NOT discount this AT ALL.
They're doubling down… Remember, rhetoric sets tone and frame Strategic framing and narrative shape opinions Shaped opinions become "beliefs" Manipulated beliefs can be used to dehumanize…
I sure hope you are, because in this election, the alternative to being a MAGA Republican, is that you are a BIDENISTA AOC SOCIALIST or a BIDENAZI NEVERTRUMP FASCIST – both clicking their jackboots to the Fuehrer Josef Beiden and his
In cases of religious mass suicide/homicide, such as Jonestown, Heaven’s Gate, and Aum Shinrikyo, it is very difficult to regain a humanitarian understanding of the key participants after the infamy of defining events sears the conscience and redefines reality.
Even more difficult, however, is the opposite – to BEGIN to think the unthinkable and speak the unspeakable, that we all seem to know is true, but which we can only comprehend in principle, not in reality.
It is almost impossible to leave the past where we could trust – and yet, we were warned about this.
Who are we taught to trust the most? This will not be easy. The END. Q
You don’t understand “revolutionary suicide”. But you need to understand it – and soon.
Those who believe in “revolutionary suicide” for most of humanity as a “solution”, are acting on that belief, because “there’s no time”.
This message about “there’s no time” was not meant as much for you, as it was meant for the people with the pitchers of Koolaid, and the people with the guns, stationed around the perimeter of the compound.
Put on your seatbelts. The truth about what is going on is going to blow you away.
Those who first noticed and described the “religion of climate change” likely had no idea that they were literally correct, but they were. It’s a cult.
The Frankfurt Marxist experiment called “Peoples Temple” and its fateful concept of “revolutionary suicide” explains all aspects of the current deadly social experiment, from Green New Deal, to Great Reset, to the semi-failed population control shot, meant to transition us into integrated population control as part of [socialized] medicine.
The climate-conned progressives had a dream. That dream, being built on a stolen election, is already “pre-failing”, but not fast enough.
We are dealing with a cult. As in the case of many cults, they are a group of well-meaning, good-intentioned people, who have a bit too much faith in their human leadership obsessed with human solutions, and not quite enough faith in God.
When the convincing argument met a pesky commandment, exceptions were made.
Now before you tell me I’m wrong, and that they’re all distinguishably and remarkably evil, unlike us, the good guys and better girls, take a minute to cool off and remember why your Bible said why we should not take too much pride in ourselves, my fellow sinner. Kurt Vonnegut turned the clarity of his PTSD-enhanced vision for our hypocrisy into a career. We could all use a bit of that vision.
Oh, there is evil mixed in – swirled into the goodness like poison until it’s tasteless – and that’s exactly why it’s hard to detect.
It’s easy to think of cults as purely evil and therefore incomprehensible, but it’s not a great way to comprehend their danger. It is when you examine their humanity, as we walk among them and smile, and they smile back with an equally human face, that you see WHERE and HOW the danger arises.
I have learned so much about God in following this story. Hopefully some of that EXTREMELY important part will help to freely convince you that you, too, need God – even if that God exists for you in the most abstract way possible – to keep you from falling into mental traps which, paradoxically, come from our human self-reliance and “realism”.
God is a weird idea that almost has to exist by emergent self-creation from our reality, like calculus does. Where does God come from? For that matter, where does math come from? What is the weird mathematics of infinity a subset of?
Simply believing there is more, and that it is not inherently against us, but for us, as demonstrated by our own existence, seems to be key to avoiding error. If you can accept that much of a Cartesian “God”, good. It is enough.
Ground yourself in God before you go on reading this. It is our lifeline back from diabolical error.
Why [Sometimes] Jones Was Right and We Were Wrong
I’m shocking you with that title of this section for a reason.
Jones was not right about everything, obviously. But he was right about enough, that if you can use that to begin to understand his motivations, and his correct thinking on some things, you can see where and how he and his followers were led astray.
This quality of being “right about too much, but misleading in the end” is VERY typical of communism, and Jones was, if you read Peoples Temple thinking, a communist of the Frankfurt School type. His Peoples Temple was a living experiment in resolving all the accused bugaboos of Western society – the “oppressions” – that critical theory challenged.
Jones saw unnecessary, systemic, racial problems and wanted to do something about them. Jones saw marginalization of women and felt it inherently wrong. Jones saw the collectivist aspects of earlier forms of Judaism and Christianity, and felt that they could not be ignored. Ironically, he did not see the power and possibility of the “greatest collective” – all of us living independently and harmoniously in a free and truthful world – but that is what made Jones perfect as a micro-reactor experiment for the creation of a very progressive “woke Christianity”. And that is exactly what he was. Woke Christianity, only 40 or 50 years ago.
Jones saw that American Christianity could be made more “social” – or socialist – and discovered that it actually worked, when judged by metrics of earthly success.
When I began to read some writings by a leftist sympathizer of Peoples Temple, based largely on the viewpoints of insiders and survivors, and she described my own deficient thinking about the People’s Temple correctly, and how I was part of the misunderstanding and minimizing thereof, I gained deep insight into not only the truly leftist nature of the Peoples Temple, which was clearly a fellow traveler of cultural Marxism, but also how seductive both critical theory is, and the Peoples Temple was. Even the analysis itself was seductive, in correctly describing the flaws of my own views of Jonestown. However, the devil is in the details, because sympathy for the people of Jonestown can easily whitewash the truth about bitter flaws in their collective, and collectivist, dream.
In the end, it’s Jesus versus Stalin. Stalin, sadly, beat Jesus in the world of Jim Jones.
Stalin will mislead you into demanding or committing harm of others for the good of the whole, whereas Jesus will lead you as an individual into sacrifice of self for the good of others.
It’s a subtle difference, but it makes all the difference in the bigger outcome.
To gain the same insights I got, you can beneficially read the same writings I did. Start here.
Not the least reason to read this, is that it reviews the FACTS of the history and the shocking, sad end of the Jonestown experiment.
Even more importantly, this reading exposes and explains strong parallels to the Climate Cult. It does so by exposing the thinking of Peoples Temple members from the inside. This thinking very obviously maps to the thinking of the Climate Cult.
Formation of the collective – mass formation psychosis – creates a world layered on this one, beautiful and addictive as hell, and soon to be enhanced by the “metaverse”. But threaten that world, or merely create the perception of threat, and the mass can be manipulated into remarkable behaviors.
Ah, the FURY that Malone’s utterance of “mass formation psychosis” provoked in the media.
To provide some contrast with the Jonestown collective’s broken view of itself, I am providing a short “outsider bibliography” on the Jonestown cult, which is differently broken, as you can see from the demonstrated preconceptions, psychological defenses, and capitalist myopias that the insider narrative points out. But be careful. Sympathy for the Jonestown victims, and understanding of them as good people much like us, can lead to sympathy for the devils that seduced them. Just because our devils hounded them, doesn’t mean that their devils didn’t destroy them.
Same goes for the Climate Cult.
If you ever had any sympathy for the Branch Davidians, you will get what I’m saying. It is much easier to see the evil in Cankles and her crew of nogoodniks in the Climate [Control] Cult, by having at least some sympathy for one of their victims – the flawed Christian cult of David Koresh. (Yeah, that gets complicated.)
Anyway, some comparisons. Here – let’s trivialize the victims!
This next one is a rough gem – very anti-Jones, but exposes the dynamic of the suicidal closest layer of followers, who are willing to be homicidal to the greater outer layer – and THAT is exactly what applies to the Climate Cult.
Now – I told you that you didn’t understand “revolutionary suicide” – so let’s fix that.
Revolutionary Suicide
What is revolutionary suicide? It is – at its core – simply taking the ultimate exit from an unjust society, instead of fighting against it. Here is Jim Jones in his own words:
We committed an act of revolutionary suicide protesting the conditions of an inhumane world.
Looking beneath that statement, trying to understand what constitutes “the conditions of an inhumane world”, I believe that what we find is the failure of the Peoples Temple cult to navigate reality. Jim Jones tried everything he could, to make his utopian vision take hold in reality, but his vision ran into more and more conflicts with the real world outside his cult, until the legal and judicial systems had Jones in a state of constant challenge. Even fleeing America itself did not work. In Guyana, the conflicts grew, until legal actions against Jim Jones were imminent. Jones correctly realized that he had nowhere left to go, and thus could not maintain his vision of the Peoples Temple. Jones could not even flee to the Soviet Union – one of the options that was always on the group’s table of discussion. Jones knew that he was politically radioactive, and no longer useful to the Soviets.
“Revolutionary suicide” is the ultimate “take your bag of marbles and go home” move – but remember – THAT is also a perfect description of individual suicide.
As a number of individuals in the Jonestown cult felt the world crashing down upon them, with the increasing problems of the cult, some felt suicide was the answer. Jones was sorely tempted by this route.
I have to ask – was the Climate Cult moved ahead in its schedule by external forces? Ask the question, because it seems to me that the answer is yes. The very defects in their plan that allowed us to see it all, may have been the result of schedule changes forced by the Trump election.
Whether individuals or groups are hounded by their own perception of external criticism, or by actual hounding, it doesn’t matter – suicide can be the result. See January Sixth, as well.
The greatest moral problem with all group suicides, including “revolutionary suicide”, is that these deaths are not free of hounding or worse, this time internal, and themselves approach or even constitute murder. Hounding, tricking, and otherwise coercing the GROUP to fully participate is the reality of the act.
Innocent people who want to LIVE are forced to DIE.
Thus, there is a HUGE footprint of MURDER in “revolutionary suicide”. This is clear in the records of the Jonestown incident. A layer of “diehards” and “inner circle” were used to enforce the group decision, leaving only a few who managed to escape by using their wits.
Shades of the jab.
Most people do not want to commit suicide. Most religions teach against it. But not all, and I believe that the truest believers at the center of the Climate Cult are quite ready to kill and be killed for their goals.
If a CIA operative suggested “revolutionary suicide” to the Jonestown cult, it would not surprise me. Their collectivist nature was highly vulnerable to this form of exploitation. Indeed, the same may apply to other cult suicides.
Either way, whether spontaneous or provoked, the possibility of group error, including group entry into a suicidal choice, is a viral vulnerability of social beings.
So now, let’s apply this fully to the Climate Cult.
Revolutionary Climate Justice
It is my contention that the Climate Cultists who are knowingly behind the Population Control Shot are mostly recruited true believers, much like those closest to Jim Jones. This would be the most obedient layer. Beyond them, however, are many who believe most of the climate cult canon, but could not be counted on to obey morally contradictory orders such as murder or suicide.
So who took the shots? Did they all play “climate roulette”?
Doubly Vaxxed and Boosted
AND logic is your friend here. Some of the “knowing” likely virtue signaled to the climate goal by taking the statistically lethal depopulation shot – others less courageous and more cowardly rationalized their “need to survive for the sake of climate justice” and did not. Bill Clinton is a great example of the latter type of thinking – his view of actual obedience to feminism in men was that “exceptions need to be made for the leaders”.
Hypocrisy. It seems to be “baked in” in communism.
Either way, shot or no shot, the true-believing “there’s no time” climate cultists are, I am certain, committed to the group goal of “saving the world from climate destruction by acting now”.
You can see this in every OTHER hare-brained scheme they are rushing forward now. The “clot shot” was merely one avenue of “saving humanity”. The others are happening right now, as food and energy systems are being destroyed, both economically and physically.
Shades of Pol Pot. Who even the Vietnamese communists knew was wrong.
Yes. It’s all backwards. It’s all deluded. It’s all destructive.
They had to show us. And we are being shown.
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) were joined by Democratic lawmakers from both the House and Senate on February 7, 2019, to introduce Green New Deal legislation.
Does this all seem a bit overwhelming? Having doubts? Is it just too much?
Here are two “public” explanations I have given for “higher credibility”. First on Steve Kirsch’s blog, then on Sundance’s post on The Burning Platform. These are the same explanation, only a bit softer and easier to digest.
Great article and statement of principled science.
People refuse to speak up about the nuttiness of it all, even though most know something is wrong, and many suspect that there is an intentional component.
I’ll spell it out. Somebody has to go first. I’m retired. I can’t lose a license or chair, or my pension (yet).
To me this was a fairly smart attempt to integrate top-decided and down-to-the-individual-tunable (see “bad batch phenomenon”) population control into medicine, and in fact a rather ingenious strategy, too. A vaccine – hero of a media-led crisis – unquestionable by the masses or the media – with a known dose-response mortality curve (see again “bad batch phenomenon”) that can in principle be dialed up to achieve ZPG, as long as denial of adverse events is enforced by holding all questions outside the Overton window. The dual nature (decrease BOTH longevity and fertility/productivity) is quite smart. It’s a bit “cinematic” and even “sci-fi”, but it worked pretty well due to human psychology.
The phony climate crisis (“there’s no time!”) was surely used to recruit many of the needed life scientists to carry it out or protect the plan. THAT was ingenious. Use an alleged crisis in one part of science to find unquestioning believers as recruits in a different part of science, who could “do something” about it.
Something very interesting here, is that this theory – which I find neatly explains all the “mistakes” people in charge have made – is crystal clear once you have “sympathy” for solving the population problem. Our leaders have encouraged desperation over the “climate crisis” in the susceptible population, and scoffing in the remainder – a very useful division for concealing the plan. The desperation messaging thus bounces off the very people who would have any inclination to look critically for such a plan or planners. Those people don’t understand the desperation of a scientist driven to “save humanity”, and thus would never bother to REALLY look for such a plan. It just seems too fantastic. One has to open up to the possibility that they might, in principle, be right, just to make the idea conceivable. But just try it. What if people REALLY BELIEVED we were going to all die in ten years, or some other typical “climate scare story”? Would you “join a global team out to save the planet”? Almost sounds like something people have been trained to do by our “entertrainment”.
So have sympathy for the devil – I mean the plan – or at least its motivation – the idea that people who really think we all will die if some are not sacrificed now – why then it all makes sense.
Now, as Steve points out, the numbers aren’t there yet on the shot, although I suspect that the long numbers on cardiac and immune deaths are more than we know yet. And beyond that, perhaps this is a bit like Hiroshima and Nagasaki – a THREAT to force us to get population under control by other means. I suspect they have a strong “Plan B” for us catching them. What is it?
I don’t like being brought to a negotiation at gunpoint, and having grabbed their gun, I’m a bit pissed. But nevertheless, here we are and it is now (and I know that what I’m selling smells like moonshine, but bear with me). Are they going to try something else, or are we going to talk about this reasonably? Judging from CDC falling back to the real science now, methinks the inevitable cover-up is going on. While I myself hang around with a crowd that screams “tribunals”, and look across the aisle at Democrats who would be the first to cry “amnesty for the climate do-gooders” (I suspect the plan counted on this), I think it does behoove us to make this stuff not able to happen again, as the most important solution. Whatever phony “lessons” come out of CDC, just ain’t gonna cut it. Human science and medicine have been damaged incredibly, but I think not irreparably, as I have faith in the truth winning in the end.
I know it all sounds fantastic, but go back over the “errors” people have made, driving toward “fair” universal deployment of the shot, and imagine that they were “trying to help”. Things start to make sense. But yes – it would be a bit cult-like, and it helps VERY much to read about the very lefty People’s Temple and “revolutionary suicide”, which is almost a model for this.
I will say this. These are NOT unforeseen consequences. They are “necessary consequences” in the eyes of the true-believing “climate cult”. A literal cult which was very intentionally created. Created to do exactly what it’s doing. And I have some new thinking on it that is difficult to speak just yet, but essential to understand.
I am now absolutely convinced that the “dumb vaccine” was a very intentional plan by these same people to achieve the same goal.
When people assert that the CIA was behind Jim Jones and Jonestown, or studied Jonestown – oh – they don’t know the half of it.
If you know anything about the Frankfurt school, their fingerprints are all over this lab experiment.
They were WAY ahead of us.
In the last couple of days, I have come to understand the relationship of Jones as a model for the Climate Cult. Even the race obsession and CRT figures into prepping this psychological attack on humanity. The weird racial and sexual psychology of that cult was a key feature, also present now.
There is a joke meme about Jonestown and Fauci, but ironically, the very communist followers of Jim Jones who survived have an excellent, critical theory-based, Frankfurt-school critique of how we, the capitalist dupes, joke about their “revolutionary suicide”, as they called it, and don’t take anything they did seriously.
They can describe us accurately. We need to describe THEM accurately. This is no longer a joke.
That mentality has been WEAPONIZED against not just America, but THE WORLD.
I’ll have more about this later today, in my “population control shot” series.
The point is, it all ties together. “They” – whoever “they” are at the top – have used a CULT they have created – to “downsize” and “disempower” humanity against its will, in defiance of all common sense.
It’s VERY culty behavior – the irrationality and schizoid behavior of the key participants (Pete Buttigieg and his SUV-to-show-bike stuff) is a feature, not a bug.
Hopefully those explanations have helped you formulate your own opinions – whether you now think I’m onto something, whether you just can’t buy any of this stuff, or something in between.
Either way – where do we go from here?
Reject Climate Insanity Completely
The world is being destroyed by foolish choices, based on insane “solutions” to BAD SCIENCE which was LOCKED IN BY MONEY.
But don’t worry – we have time.
Trump is right – we can “build back a third time” after their latest destruction, even if many lives are lost or worsened in the process.
It’s tough, but accepting bad elections has consequences. Both GOPe and RINOs need to suffer for their sins. Smart solutions will now take time, where rush jobs (like AGW) lead to HACK SOLUTIONS like Windows Me or the spike protein, take your pick.
I’m not in a rush – I think we can wait until we’re at the brink, so that everybody agrees – this is all nuts.
BUUUUUT – I do have a solution, of how to get to that brink of “all the sane people agree” much faster.
In many ways, I am going to back up Sundance’s approach.
Stated differently, SCREW THE VIRTUE SIGNALS. We can’t afford to politely agree with the CRAP any more. Let people KNOW that it’s crap, that you don’t agree with it, and that you will not vote for anybody who even puts up with the crap when THEY are faced with it.
The CRAP is destroying the world, and WE don’t go along with it.
I repeat. You need to stop virtue signaling to the mainstream narratives, and most importantly THE CLIMATE NARRATIVE, in any form.
It you want to know the ONE REASON why Trump was not “allowed” to be President, I can tell you with near certainty – it is because he REJECTS the “climate games” in their entirety.
Trump LOVES the environment, but he REJECTS the weird corporate “bad science” that was layered into it, with the absurd CO2-based climate change story. And so do I. I reject their bad science and even more their toxic workarounds that stem from the bad science.
[Note: I have watched “climate science” from the beginning, and I have NEVER seen science that convinced me of anthropogenic global warming climate change being real – much less a threat to humanity, even if it was real. Indeed, I see an incipient ice age as the far greater threat – and one that is EASILY dealt with by following the path we were on before SOMEBODY decided to downgrade humanity rather than upgrading our technology. ]
No. Just NO. We don’t put up with climate insanity (please call it that), nor do we put up with those who TOLERATE IT. Not just those who advocate it. Those who TOLERATE IT.
And THAT gets to the SECOND point.
This point bears on Sundance’s shrewd recognition of the “DeSantis problem”.
We need to goad all GOP candidates into the “WEF unacceptable zone”.
Why is DeSantis acceptable to the establishment Republicans? Is it because he will tolerate climate nuttiness? The ONE necessity for a nod from Davos?
Personally, I like DeSantis, but I see clearly that the other side is using him to derail Trump. They have a smart strategy there. Evil, but smart.
Well, one way to thwart that is for DeSantis to join Trump in denouncing the climate insanity in no uncertain terms. In terms that are so strong, they make him utterly unacceptable to WEF and the quislings in GOPe.
“It’s wrong. It’s a hoax. It’s destroying the planet. It has to stop.”
And then, to spread it, a little criticism of even the slightest climate belief as a RINO position should put the fear of God in Washington.
Oh, DeSantis’s RINO advisors will go through the ROOF, but tough times call for tough measures. Klaus Schwab, Larry Fink and the Rothschild entourage need to burn in anger at the rejection. And while we’re on Fink, ESG needs to DIE. Kill it, before it kills humanity.
Climate insanity is crap, and it needs to end. NOW.
This means that a lot of GOP need to feel the STING – the BURN – of rejection.
When they so much as NOD to the bullshit, they PAY WITH THE BASE.
Are we clear? GOOD.
BURN THEIR GOD, CLIMATE CHANGE, AT THE STAKE.
Final Thoughts
We have to grab the steering wheel. It’s that simple. We’re not going to kill anybody. We’re not going to have an “insurrection”. We’re going to demand that these assholes who have fucked everything up, stand down with their insanity and their corruption.
EVERY. SINGLE. FUCKING. DAY. You are going to have to make these people feel like CRAP for supporting INSANITY and causing HAVOC.
Get tough. It’s the only way forward. But you can do it.
In the wake of Wheatie Warrior’s passing, we renew the site mission by directly addressing “things unspoken” – now brought into the light.
In the immediate aftermath of the passing of our dear Wheatie, announced last Monday, I chose to deal with only the most substantive technicalities, in large part so that we could properly grieve, and not get caught up in mundane and mortal technicalities. Thus, many important questions for discussion were set aside.
I will deal with those items, and much more, in this post.
(More mood music from Wheatie can be found at the end.)
Wheatie Warrior
Unlike the expected passings of some of our other comrades, Wheatie was, for lack of a better term, “missing in action”. There are reasons for this, and they bear explanation.
In giving you some explanations, I will be limiting what I tell you for TWO reasons.
ONE is out of respect for Wheatie’s desire for privacy. All authors and posters here can expect the same respect. If you want to consciously, knowingly, and with extreme intention, tell the world who you are, that is fine with me. Otherwise, I will assume you want some privacy, and by default will protect that privacy – even upon your illness, death, or simply leaving of this site – no matter under what circumstances. Maintaining your privacy does not include legitimate concerns of law enforcement, blah-blah-blah. Note, however, that I said “legitimate”.
TWO is in order to maintain site security. Keeping the enemy guessing is useful.
SO – why was Wheatie “missing in action”?
In contrast to most of the authors and commenters here, Wheatie was extremely careful to shield her identity. She did not wander far from this site. She didn’t post on “big tech” social media, other than Gab, and that was only after its security was proven, and after Gab was chosen as a secure posting back-up for this site.
Wheatie’s computer security was “minimally divulged” and “not negotiable”. Very often, with authors, I have to deal with security (or lack thereof) and/or permissions needed to work on posts or to upload information, the requirements of which are more rigorous than for merely commenting. Thus, I often learn a lot about an author’s practices of and attitudes toward computer security. They range, and that’s OK.
I will not get into Wheatie’s exact security measures, but they were substantial. Wheatie NEVER allowed convenience to trump security. She would NEVER lower security in order to comment on a site, create an account, watch a video, etc. Wheatie was a ROCK on the items needed to keep this site safe, and her identity private.
Indeed, the only people who appear to have ever gotten past her security, of which I am aware, was the Q team.
That is, in fact, why Wheatie was trusted by me, as she was trusted “in real life”. She NEVER let emotions get in the way of logical thinking, when it came to security. She was cool as a cucumber in tricky situations.
SO – without giving you the details, which would help our enemies, I can tell you that Wheatie’s own security measures likely prevented her from contacting us when she became ill, and until her death.
I want to repeat that. Wheatie was so mission-focused that she did not break her own security policy, or allow somebody else to break it, to let us know that she was in trouble.
Indeed, Wheatie tended to keep mum about most of her medical dealings, other than minor details about symptoms she was experiencing.
All of this combined to make it very difficult to find out what happened to Wheatie, when she went missing. We were very lucky, in fact, that she had divulged a few small things to me, ironically in the interest of assisting with site security. That was enough to help make a “positive ID”. Without that information, we might have never known for sure what happened to her.
Now – this would have all been a “bonk on my head” to start opening up a bit more with you – not just about my own situation, but about YOUR need to “make arrangements”, so that you, too, are not “missing in action” someday.
But there was another death that hit me particularly hard, which gave me a “double-bonk”.
My Friend, The Spy Popular Guy
There is nothing that will wake one up to one’s own mortality faster than a younger friend or relative dying. And that is exactly what happened to me.
At some point during the first half of this year – basically while Wheatie was MIA – I had another friend – a close friend – who “died suddenly and unexpectedly”. And “suspiciously”, I might add, in the words of the police.
Yeah, you are immediately thinking EXACTLY what I’m thinking.
IT WAS PROBABLY THE FUCKING JABS.
I do know that my friend HAD to have been jabbed, because it was a condition to go back to on-site work, after roughly two years of work-at-home. Indeed, he had JUST started going back to on-site work at that employer – which I can tell you for a FACT is “deep state” as all get-out.
That employer has a rather sneaky total vaccination requirement. Everybody has to go back to partial on-site work, and everybody who works on-site has to be jabbed. That kind of “two-step from hell” logic is par for the course with this DS outfit.
“Oh, no – we don’t require our employees to be vaccinated. Only if they are on site.”
“But you’re requiring everybody to work on site.”
“People who are required to work on-site are only required to work on site part of the time.”
“But on the days they are required to work on site, they’re required to be vaccinated – no?”
“You’ll have to talk to our Washington office about the exact specifics of the policy.”
OMG – the double-talk.
Now – as far as I know – the circumstances of death point to stroke or heart attack. The trouble is that, when I go into “I’m not a medical examiner, but I slept at a Holiday Inn Express” mode, I realize without too much deep thought, that it could also have been a “George Floyd” type of death – e.g., a fentanyl-induced heart stoppage, or something similar. AND – sadly – because this person had been a known toker and party guy in his youth, any murder with drugs will likely stick as a drug death, despite the fact that this guy NEVER did hard drugs or popped pills, to my knowledge. He had not even toked in decades, to my knowledge. But unfortunately for the truth, a past like his can be used quite easily as cover. Families and survivors will ASSIST in the cover-up of a drug death.
You may be asking “why would Wolf worry that his friend might have been murdered?” Hang in there – I’ll get to it.
My friend was in excellent health – mild high blood pressure being treated – but otherwise robust. Running, cycling, tennis, ping-pong, backpacking – you name it, he did it. Good weight, good habits, good lifestyle.
It was definitely NOT suicide. No note, no obvious means, and the most happy-go-lucky guy on Earth, with everything going right and looking forward to an excellent retirement.
He could have retired at any time, and THAT is where I’m guilty of not saving him from the jab.
You see, this guy – I am certain – was connected to some agency or entity – I just don’t know who. White hat – black hat – gray hat – sun visor – whatever – he was either working for somebody, informing for somebody, or (and this is quite certain) had friends who were “somebody”. It could have even been that he was “nobody” – but EVERYBODY was watching him because of his connections.
And it gets MORE complicated. My friend was everybody’s friend. “Everybody” included absolutely anybody and everybody who you might think was a foreign or domestic spy, a player, an asset, an informant, a defector, or even just a potential mass shooter. He just “accidentally” made it a point to know all the “interesting” people. It was uncanny.
I never knew where my friend took information, but it was clear he was scooping up knowledge for somebody – and also carrying out some kind of “orders of influence” – but it was impossible to separate the real person from his apparent “mission”. And on top of that, his life was full of contradictory cover. He could have been a very good spy – or just a nobody.
Trust me – he was not a nobody.
This guy was an exceptional person – as in an exceptionally good person. He wasn’t a church-goer – far from it – but he had been raised in a godly family, by a deeply religious mother, and it showed. Despite hanging out with some of the most anti-Christian people you can imagine, he showed all of the Christian virtues in spades, to an almost Biblical degree. There were times that I wondered if he wasn’t some kind of “undercover angel”, if you know what I’m saying.
And all of that ended – mysteriously – some time after he took the jab.
But here’s the thing.
One of the biggest reasons he took the jab is because I stopped giving him information.
I stopped giving him information because of January Sixth.
I stopped giving him information because I knew that my conversations with him were always recorded by somebody – probably FIB – and that whoever was behind him would pressure him into asking about January Sixth.
And it’s not just because I expected ANYTHING I said about January Sixth to be abused by the disgraceful DODGE and FIB.
You see, there are things about January Sixth – things I saw that day – that I have not told anybody. Things that I have not told you all. Things that have implications I don’t understand.
Things that are – as I like to call them – potential “nukes”.
For my own selfish battle reasons, I didn’t tell him the information that could have saved him, about the jabs.
What could I have done differently?
Were I a better and more courageous person, I would have taken his calls. I would have warned him about the jab. I would have – ultimately – talked him out of it. I would have told him everything I knew – all my scientific thinking about it. I would have let him follow along on my journey from “hopeful believer” in the jabs, to “red-pilled realist” warning people against them. I would have said “RETIRE NOW! Take your money and GTFO while you can. Don’t let that place kill you!”
And yet, all of that is still “love of this world”. What if HE did the right thing by just letting the jabs kill him, innocently? What if – weirdly – the disease and the jabs are God’s way of evacuating the righteous from this sinful world?
I will always be second-guessing what I did and didn’t do – just like the guy who I let the ChiComs destroy and drive nuts at “shallow state”, so that I wouldn’t spill my secret knowledge that his boss had been identified to me as a ChiCom asset.
THIS MORTAL WORLD IS ROUGH. Our actions suck. Our inactions suck. Our justifications stink in the nostrils of The Lord. Or reasoning is foul and filled with error.
So – where does that leave me? Other than two steps from hell?
Wolficarditis
I have generally been vague about my health issues or lack thereof, to create as much uncertainty as possible. The “event people” are constantly looking for plausible excuses for their little arranged deaths, so it’s generally advisable to keep as much medical privacy as possible.
The problem is, both openness and secrecy can be used by the other side. Sometimes, oddly, openness is more of a friend than secrecy. After Wheatie’s passing, and that of my friend, I’ve begun to see more virtue in a bit more openness.
So you’re going to get some.
I’m actually in pretty good health for my age, but after my initial bout of Wuhan-vintage COVID, in January 2020, my level of health became erratic.
What I did NOT tell people here, when I talked about “taking care of health matters”, is that I was in the hospital a few times.
Generally speaking, I don’t like to let people know that I’m in the hospital, if I can possibly avoid it. Worse still, I also found it easier to just keep the secret after getting out of the hospital. I don’t know if that was such a good idea now.
I definitely had a cardiac inflammation which I’m going to call “wolficarditis”, to retain just a wee bit of ambiguity on the diagnosis. We will never be exactly sure what caused it, but I can tell you that it was not the jabs, because I never took one.
There is some possibility that my wolficarditis was “smoldering” since either Wuhan (Jan 2020) or Delta (Nov 2021). Or, alternatively, it could have been caused by a later brief, mild, illness which was probably either omicron or flu (but which tested negative for COVID on the initial and only test).
The first time in the hospital, between Wuhan and Delta, was mysterious. It involved odd and extremely unusual high blood pressure, weak pulse, altered vision, and distorted time perception. Looking at it now, it may very well have been what our member Happy go luckydescribed to us recently – a lacunar stroke – or perhaps a similar type of intermittent blockage.
Anyway, ironically, I’m now doing exactly what I need to do for BOTH wolficarditis and wolfmoonar stroke. I feel great, and will continue to do so, until I don’t.
And when I don’t, I will make sure that there is a PLAN in place, to deal with the issue, and any potential aftermath.
So let’s start talking about plans.
Your Personal Plan
If you are happy with being able to come and go from this site unnoticed, to depart with quiet mystery from this site forevermore, when you depart this world, then we’re done here. You can move on to the next section of this post. You like your privacy, and…..
“Privacy is not a crime.”
People here have no need or right to know what happened to you, if you leave the site for any reason – temporarily or permanently.
That said, friendships develop, and we worry about our friends worrying. Many of us have been together on this site for approaching 4 years, and for many of us, 4 to 8 years on CTH before that. Think about it! That’s a long time. We have talked more to each other online, than with many “real” friends in “real life”!!!
Thus, if you’re one of those people who feels a need to “stay in touch” with the group here, in the event of hospitalization or death, then please read on.
When I talked about what happened to Wheatie, two people – cthulhu and Aubergine – immediately commented about making arrangements for the blog to be notified in the event of tragedy. Cthulhu estimated only a 30% chance of this “digital legacy” working – Aubergine estimated 15%. That will do in a pinch, but hopefully this post will give all of you some tips to raise the percentage.
First, let me explain something important. ANYBODY can post on this site, and I WILL see it. This means that you can always get word to the gang via me or one of the authors.
So – if you are in the hospital, and can get online somehow, or can instruct somebody else to get online, all they have to do is get on this site (theqtree.com) on somebody’s phone and leave a comment AS A GUEST on any post, and I WILL see it, and it will NOT publish. If you want it to be for my eyes only, then make the comment on any one of my posts, such as the Monday open thread – otherwise, depat, bakocarl, SteveinCO, or any other author of that post particular post will ALSO see the comment (in addition to me).
You don’t have to use your normal information on this strange device, although you can do it if you want to do it. Perhaps you’re using a trusted relative’s device. Perhaps you’re borrowing a phone from a nurse or hospital staff member. The point is, you can identify yourself in the message of the comment. If I need to, I’ll respond to you in the same article or daily open thread.
The reason this works is that ALL NEW COMMENTS from new users, as well as comments with a new origin or some other change (including spelling errors), will always go into moderation, where I will see them.
You are “never alone” from your friends from this site, if you can get on the internet somehow.
However, this only takes care of situations where YOU are able to communicate. What if you can’t? What if you are intubated in an ICU, in a coma, or even GONE?
For these situations, you need to leave instructions with SOMEBODY. Those instructions can be at any level of formality or legality. AGAIN, your friends and relatives can ALL comment on this site, and I will get their comment in moderation, if they have never commented here before. I can then make a judgement of what information should be passed on to the group, per the instructions passed on to me.
You are welcome to test this out on a friend or family member’s device. I will NOT approve the comment, but I will tell you if it worked. That way it will work exactly the same, the next time, in a real situation.
Some people leave a digital legacy – which is a new feature in the Apple world. This means that people can leave control of their devices to a spouse, friend, relative, or business partner.
Other people leave their usernames and passwords to their survivors. Still others end up having some computer or phone professional get into the devices – if it’s even possible.
Please feel free to discuss personal plans in the comments, or to “test out” your plan, if you’re unsure.
But now, we have to talk about something else.
We have to talk about my plan for the site.
The Group Plan
The advantage of having a single admin who is a “security hardcore” is that there are very few social hacks that can get around site security. The disadvantage is that this single point of failure means that the entire site may fail. And yet, THAT is part of the plan. Most members here are already active on several allied sites. We also have a Gab group where people can meet freely. We have plenty of back-up. This site can disappear tomorrow, and the GROUP survives.
The value of our site is not in the archival content, as much as it is in the organic continuity of research and understanding. The primary strength of the site is in our evolving conversation and thoughts, which include many alternative viewpoints and beliefs.
Our strength is in our community, not in this site per se.
Thus, I always regard our community as its own failsafe plan. If something happens to me, and/or to this site, you all will figure out what to do.
Indeed, some of us made continuity plans in the very beginning of the site. The strategy was somewhat Alexandrian. By many of us secretly preparing to lead future alternative sites, the regime would have to play whack-a-mole to stop us.
And look at us now. Look how many healthy, viable, and active or potentially active blogs and discussion sites were created by members here.
THAT is our true safety net. This site can literally VANISH OVERNIGHT, and yet the GROUP lives on.
Now, since none of you noticed my being in the hospital, any of the times it happened, it would seem that my plan for such circumstances is both working and well-tested.
The problem is, that if I die, there need to be further arrangements. I will be shoring up the contingency plans for my “sudden departure” during the next few months. My main concern is preservation of the contents on the internet. It is likely that I can leave a small trust to support the site for a number of months or years, or at least long enough to copy the contents, if desired. The problem is then handing over administration. That gets tricky, and I need to consider the options. That will not be arranged in the open.
Right now, the cost of the site is roughly $1500 a year, but it will likely rise rapidly under Bidenomics. For other reasons, however, we may also want to move the site to a new host, depending upon what happens with our nutty regime trying to start World War III. In that event, the cost may increase or decrease. We have already been hit by a 10% energy cost increase. Don’t ask about the exact circumstances – just know that Biden is why.
Therefore, in the event of my demise, it may be best to “start over” on a free site somewhere, with a new admin, and then re-grow from that colonization.
We’ll see. I will say this. I’m not worried.
In God We Trust
You can worry about your legacy here – or you can forget about it. Ultimately, God is in control, and will correct your errors. Trusting in God will see you through.
The world to worry about is not this one – it is the spiritual world that only vaguely but beautifully intersects our own world, through us. Stand up for Truth, and the Spirit of Truth which defends Truth. Defend the Kingdom of Heaven, and its footprint in this world.
Ashes to ashes. Dust to dust. But from that fire, arises a light that pleases The Lord. Help to make it so.
It’s time for some frank discussion of the future of this site.
My primary mission remains unchanged – to get important thoughts and ideas out where they can be seen – whether those ideas are mine or somebody else’s (AND generally a mixture of the two, anyway).
Secondary missions (haven for the Qrious, MAGA rally site, free speech site, etc.) are also unchanged.
The attrition of commenting on the site is only moderately concerning to me, outside of impeding the primary mission, which is to GET THE WORD OUT. But the truth is, the primary mission IS being impeded. THAT cannot be allowed.
Lately, I’ve had SEVERAL very important articles missing either writing, editing, or publication – both ON TIME and AT ALL. I can’t do that any more. Some of what was missed may be life-or-death for the Republic.
Thus, I’m taking some actions to shore things up.
POINT 1
In order to focus my limited time on important political, scientific, and spiritual/religious articles, which I have been SKIPPING in order to do the Monday and Friday dailies, I am going to change the nature of those dailies to more suit getting substantial messages out quickly as single articles. Thus, I’m planning to drop the honorific elaborations of “Wheatietoo” style” and “Grandmaintexas format” – that is, unless somebody else steps up to take those dailies. It would then be their choice to either DROP or continue those styles. Those authors could even do placeholder posts just like me – I’m not picky.
Yes, I loved those Wheatie and Grandma styles. However, I’m a poor substitute for the real thing, and it takes me a LOT of time to emulate them. Something has to give, and THAT is it.
If somebody wants to keep up those dailies in something resembling their current format, or would like to try something different, great. Please volunteer as an author.
Otherwise, I will be shortening all of my daily threads, now and in the future, to placeholders like on CTH.
Authorship isn’t difficult, if you want to make the dailies “more interesting placeholders” with fresh header images, a brief message, or something of the sort. Authors are free to do whatever they want. We do have a suggested guideline HERE:
[NOTE: Everything after this in square brackets is me as the IMPETUOUS EDITOR. Don’t put any of the square bracket [] stuff in a post. It’s just us talking – MKAY?] [RE the TITLE: Dear KMAG, Dear MAGA, Dear KAG, or Dear KAG! is required, followed by a colon, a space, the date in YYYYMMDD …
The last “honorific” daily on my part will be tomorrow’s post, for Pi Day, 20220314. Enjoy!
Point 2
In the same vein, I no longer have time to EDIT any articles by authors. If you want to publish it, you have to carry the ball the whole 100 yards, and PUBLISH or SCHEDULE. I will release articles that get stuck by the failure of the scheduler, but that’s it.
Point 3
Otherwise, the future of the site is very solid. We are now on good hosting, free of censorship concerns for the moment. I am investing appropriately and substantially, as planned, and the “church budget” is good. This site is NOT going away.
Point 4
If you have any concerns, ideas, suggestions, or contributions, this is an appropriate place to make them known. However, I will not be changing my plans regarding Points 1 and 2 unless YOU YOURSELF ARE VOLUNTEERING to do the heavy lifting of your own suggestion(s).
Suggestions for OTHER PEOPLE to carry out YOUR IDEAS will have to pass muster with my assistant.
Compared to Morris the Finicky Cat, this guy isn’t just picky – he’s downright suspicious!
I think it is now quite clear that Bill and Melinda Gates need to get the hell out of science and medicine for the good of humanity.
I am going to show you why.
I am not saying that Bill Gates is doing anything new. I am saying that he moved his disastrous “Windows Effect” from information technology – which Gates corrupted and hindered with his inferior product and short-sighted greed – to human health – where Gates is doing the exact same thing, only with more obvious damage to society and individuals.
I’m going to start at the END – with the most recent bit of evidence, which finally compelled me to write this article.
Hat tip apudlo on Gab for reposting this link, leading me to this study.
This isn’t just a 70% reduction in mortality of COVID-19 relative to no treatment. This is 70% reduction relative to treatment with Anthony Fauci’s “gold standard of care”, remdesivir.
Actually – let’s take a bit of a sidebar and then a hypostrophe (return from a parenthetical discussion) on the subject of remdesivir.
There will be justice for Veronica Wolski, because we will DEMAND IT. And until there IS justice, we will drag the CRIMES of Anthony Fauci and Gilead “Pharmaceuticals” and their SLEAZY ASSOCIATES thorough the headlines, over and over, until people SPIT IN THEIR PATH as they walk down the streets. So where do we begin? …
Well, they can lock us out of The Q Tree, but they can’t stop the truth from getting out. Enjoy a post first over on The U Tree and now HERE. Here is a quickie in my WAR ON REMDESIVIR. Fellow Treeper barkerjim dropped an interesting document today, from back in July, which showed the …
Hat tip DP…. wait for the remdesivir part…..
Cardiologists encouraging q6 month V-compliance despite myocardial damage and the use of inpatient R-vir despite WHO recommendation against and overt kidney/liver damage contributing to death are manifestations of mass formation psychosis @PaLegis@dougmastriano@PAHouseGOPpic.twitter.com/7iKoA7IEJB
— Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® (@P_McCulloughMD) March 6, 2022
This is actually quite analogous to what the “medical establishment” did with mercury back in the day, when calomel and other mercury medicines killed and injured MILLIONS of Americans in the 19th century.
The Pub is OPEN! We are NOT serving mercurials or arsenicals today – or EVER – but we ARE serving MODERN SUBSTITUTES like penicillin – to the non-allergic, of course. While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE. Christmas Spirit And now, the rules of …
But let’s return to BILL GATES.
Fauci and remdesivir are another story. Bill Gates is all about the vaccines. If Gates is kicking remdesivir under the table, I would not be surprised, but I tend to doubt it, because Gates seems to respect OTHER corrupt players, to some extent.
The point is, this brand new study CONFIRMS what we know from many other studies – that ivermectin really does reduce death from COVID-19 – and that it does so substantially.
Not only THAT, but the “70% reduction” figure has appeared MULTIPLE TIMES before, and is not only confirming in its magnitude, but is also extremely indicting of Bill Gates, as we shall see in a moment.
One “70%” case is cited in the link – a recent Malaysian study – where is appears that the authors deliberately misinterpreted their data, effectively HIDING a 70% reduction in mortality by ivermectin, by claiming the “p” value of the results meant they were insignificant, being only 91% instead of 95% or 99% (basically, the study was too small).
This “capture and kill by underpowering the study” is a NIFTY TRICK, which was also discussed by Steve Kirsch, and which I have covered previously.
The big picture, however, is that (1) authors have a variety of means of making a paper produce conclusions that are completely at odds with the data, and (2) they are using such techniques to satisfy their sponsors when the “science” doesn’t give the results hoped for by the sponsors.
Don’t believe me?
It turns out there is ANOTHER 70% reduction ivermectin paper we need to talk about.
And in that case, there is strong evidence that BILL GATES is behind the effective SCIENTIFIC BURYING of the result.
Hat tip to eilert and Sundance for this one.
This is the biggie. This is where Bill Gates showed his true self to the planet.
TIME and PERSISTENCE have narrowed down WHERE and WHEN it was, that ivermectin was blocked from becoming a universal treatment for COVID-19.
This work is mostly due to Tess Lawrie, who was one of the speakers (from England, via internet video) at the Defeat the Mandates rally in Washington, DC.
The article frames a video by Tess Lawrie, which, as Sundance rightly states, is STUNNING. Yes, it is somewhat professionally produced, but speaking as a scientist, this is one of the most insightful and direct explorations of institutional scientific misconduct which has ever been put on the table.
It is shockingly clear from this video that ivermectin was saving OVER 70% – in fact 75% – of hospitalized patients who would have otherwise died. They are talking about tens of thousands of patients DAILY. Using an EXTREMELY safe drug.
This video lays it all out – who was responsible for the corruption of the conclusions of the preprint which blocked ivermectin – a FRONT ORGANIZATION for Bill & Melinda Gates called Unitaid. We don’t know the names of the individuals in Unitaid yet, but it’s very clear that TENS OF THOUSANDS immediately, and ultimately HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS – worldwide even MILLIONS of people died – because of an ABUSE OF SCIENCE.
It’s very simple. Anybody can see what they did there.
“Let them die – we want the money.”
But now, let me tell you something MORE.
There is also evidence that Bill Gates has done EVEN MORE to block “old” drugs for COVID-19.
Begin with “LancetGate” and the “LancetGate Effect“. LancetGate was the first instance, where a FALSE anti-hydroxychloroquine paper – later RETRACTED – literally caused DEATHS that could be seen on a graph, due to panicked withdrawal of HCQ from patients in Switzerland, by a RASH bureaucratic ban on treatment with it.
This is explained in an article I did, covering a SECOND case of the LancetGate effect, where a ban on ivermectin was lifted, resulting in suppression of a wave of the delta variant in Indonesia.
The murderous LancetGate Effect is back, and this time it killed thousands before bureaucrats relented and allowed doctors to save patients. [ Hat Tip to barkerjim for alerting me to this Indonesian case. ] Part 1 – LancetGate Effect 1.0 and 1.1 Ah, the memories of LancetGate! That moment when “they” “finally” “proved” that hydroxychloroquine …
I have always suspected that Bill Gates was somehow behind the retracted LancetGate paper, but I’ve never been able to prove it. Part of that suspicion dated back to the very beginning of the COVID pandemic. When Bill Gates, “Mr. Vaxx and Vaxx Alone”, decided that treatments needed study, I knew that THE FIX WAS IN.
Yeah. This fucker can PAY FOR MY RESPIRATOR. Just read this. The guy who funded the UNETHICAL virus research that gave me the fucking shortness of breath….. The guy who promoted a curiously fortuitous corona virus “exer-psy-op” while his CHINESE FRIENDS let loose the ChiCom-19 virus….. The guy who worked with DEMOCRATS to try to …
And then, when LancetGate hit, I suspected Gates.
However, it was only LATER that I stumbled upon ANOTHER instance of Gates’ apparent meddling in the scientific examination of hydroxychloroquine. Discussed HERE:
The Pub is OPEN again! With a blend of humor and seriousness, like any good bar, we celebrate this grand re-opening of WOLF’S PUB on Christmas Eve, December 24, 2021, by actually opening near closing time on Christmas Eve Eve, but what the heck. IT’S ALMOST CHRISTMAS. While our beloved bartender takes a needed break …
This one was actually a bit of a gold mine. Not only did I find that Facebook, Twitter, Gates and Pfizer were all tied behind a study which trashed hydroxychloroquine – there was ANOTHER study in the mix, funded by this gang, which pooh-poohed ivermectin.
These papers did NOT get big play in public – rather, they were used to quietly influence doctors behind the scenes. Gates is CUNNING, and he clearly does NOT want the “crowd” interfering in his delicate, moneyed, subversive operations.
He LEARNED after LancetGate, IMO, to be a bit more stealthy.
I have NOT looked at these two papers since the discovery of the funding. I do believe that when it first came out, I may have read the HCQ paper, if it’s the one I think it is, which was done in Brazil. I remember that at the time, I thought it was problematic for some reason, but I don’t really want to look at it again, because I think it would be better if OTHER scientists looked at these two studies and figured out what’s wrong with them.
Because I will BET MONEY there is something wrong with them. But I would rather just be the one to point out the funding issues, and let others find the science problems independently.
Now – there is one other potential scandal here, which almost nobody is talking about except me, and that has to do with the “suppression” of the fact that simple, normal, drug-store antihistamines have a rather profound effect in preventing death by COVID-19.
You didn’t know that, did you?
The Spanish nursing home study. Never heard of it, unless you follow a few sites like this one, or Jo Nova, or Karl Denninger.
This signal showed up in the literature several times, and NOBODY followed up on it. But in terms of saving lives, simple, over-the-counter antihistamines have been IMPRESSIVE.
Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …
Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President: AND our wonderful REALFLOTUS. Hopefully, this great couple is getting some REST, because they may NEED IT. I am telling y’all – the Trumps may very well be on their way back to the White House in 1-3 years. In fact, the way Obammunism has been …
You see, it’s actually rather ironic, but while we were all distracted by the drama of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, nicely seeded by the other side, nobody paid any attention to the massive live-saving signal from drugstore antihistamines.
Something out in the public, that nobody could have stopped us from using. Something that – from THEIR point of view – could not have been allowed to become a public controversy, if they wanted the vaccines approved.
This is why – even though I am totally in favor of HCQ and ivermectin – I think it’s important to look deeper, and see how ALL OF US were fooled. The Spanish nursing home study was DONE treating patients in June of 2020. The results were in. The doctors finished their paper in September, but had already gone to the media 3 weeks into June.
There is no reason we could not have been saving people worldwide with their protocol, other than the likelihood that somebody didn’t want that knowledge to get out. And one of the ways to do that, is to set up a Hegelian conflict where the media sides AGAINST treatments in favor of the vaccines as “the only way”.
EVERYTHING after that is just a story of the FAILURE of human science, with all its “big data” and all its “artificial intelligence”, to FIND THAT SIGNAL, AMPLIFY IT, and START SAVING LIVES.
But that’s not what happened. Using a Hegelian process, we were made to fight over TWO DRUGS that THEY COULD CONTROL – and our minds were steered away from even safer and possibly even more effective common drugs that THEY COULD NOT CONTROL.
Even famotidine (a digestive tract H2 antihistaminic) is a distraction from the obvious truth that respiratory-tract-affecting H1 antihistaminics were found by both the Spanish authors and Dr. Chetty in South Africa to completely eliminate mortality from the inflammatory stage of COVID-19, if administered as soon as hypoxia ensues, or better still, at the first symptoms of the disease.
Well, here’s what I think.
I don’t think this signal was “lost”. I think this signal was covered up when possible, and distracted from when it could not be covered up.
And if you don’t think Bill Gates was somehow involved in that, you have a lot of catching up to do.
EVENT 201 SPONSORS:
Event 201 was designed to give people PRECONCEPTIONS.
Event 201 was designed to make sure people believed certain things – many of which science was about to find were simply UNTRUE. It was also designed to make sure people did NOT believe other things – or think them possible. And, I believe, Event 201 is also why much of the World Health Organization’s early advice was just plain BAD.
THEY were misled TOO.
At this point, I’m not sure how much Bill Gates is responsible for, but I do know this.
I am prepared to question every single word that comes out of his mouth.
He is NOT HERE TO HELP. I am not sure what in the hell he is up to, but he’s not here to help.
Sundance has a great article up right now, in which he shows why his warning about Western COVID authoritarianism is coming true, by highlighting a speech by Vladimir Putin.
Let me back up a bit.
Sundance has been saying that the increasing authoritarianism and brutality of the Western “democracies” over COVID mandates, is placing those countries (including the USA) in the dangerous position of giving real credibility to human rights criticisms by Russia, China and Iran.
He has ALSO been saying that this unearned credibility has significant geopolitical consequence.
Sundance has WARNED, that as Western criticisms of Russia and China grow more hypocritical, those same Western countries will NOT be able to object, much less react, to aggressive moves by Russia and China.
I urge you to go read Sundance’s thoughts – UNTIL you get to the translated transcript of Vladimir Putin’s amazing speech. Sundance only provides the most highly relevant part of the speech.
I want you to come back here, and read THE WHOLE DAMN SPEECH.
I will save my thoughts for the end. It’s much more profitable if you read his speech yourselves, and come to the same conclusions independently, which I am sure you will.
President of Russia Vladimir Putin:
Ladies and gentlemen,
To begin with, I would like to thank you for coming to Russia and taking part in the Valdai Club events.
As always, during these meetings you raise pressing issues and hold comprehensive discussions of these issues that, without exaggeration, matter for people around the world. Once again, the key theme of the forum was put in a straightforward, I would even say, point-blank manner: Global Shake-up in the 21st Century: The Individual, Values and the State.
Indeed, we are living in an era of great change. If I may, by tradition, I will offer my views with regard to the agenda that you have come up with.
In general, this phrase, “to live in an era of great change,” may seem trite since we use it so often. Also, this era of change began quite a long time ago, and changes have become part of everyday life. Hence, the question: are they worth focusing on? I agree with those who made the agenda for these meetings; of course they are.
In recent decades, many people have cited a Chinese proverb. The Chinese people are wise, and they have many thinkers and valuable thoughts that we can still use today. One of them, as you may know, says, “God forbid living in a time of change.” But we are already living in it, whether we like it or not, and these changes are becoming deeper and more fundamental. But let us consider another Chinese wisdom: the word “crisis” consists of two hieroglyphs – there are probably representatives of the People’s Republic of China in the audience, and they will correct me if I have it wrong – but, two hieroglyphs, “danger” and “opportunity.” And as we say here in Russia, “fight difficulties with your mind, and fight dangers with your experience.”
Of course, we must be aware of the danger and be ready to counter it, and not just one threat but many diverse threats that can arise in this era of change. However, it is no less important to recall a second component of the crisis – opportunities that must not be missed, all the more so since the crisis we are facing is conceptual and even civilisation-related. This is basically a crisis of approaches and principles that determine the very existence of humans on Earth, but we will have to seriously revise them in any event. The question is where to move, what to give up, what to revise or adjust. In saying this, I am convinced that it is necessary to fight for real values, upholding them in every way.
Humanity entered into a new era about three decades ago when the main conditions were created for ending military-political and ideological confrontation. I am sure you have talked a lot about this in this discussion club. Our Foreign Minister also talked about it, but nevertheless I would like to repeat several things.
A search for a new balance, sustainable relations in the social, political, economic, cultural and military areas and support for the world system was launched at that time. We were looking for this support but must say that we did not find it, at least so far. Meanwhile, those who felt like the winners after the end of the Cold War (we have also spoken about this many times) and thought they climbed Mount Olympus soon discovered that the ground was falling away underneath even there, and this time it was their turn, and nobody could “stop this fleeting moment” no matter how fair it seemed.
In general, it must have seemed that we adjusted to this continuous inconstancy, unpredictability and permanent state of transition, but this did not happen either.
I would like to add that the transformation that we are seeing and are part of is of a different calibre than the changes that repeatedly occurred in human history, at least those we know about. This is not simply a shift in the balance of forces or scientific and technological breakthroughs, though both are also taking place. Today, we are facing systemic changes in all directions – from the increasingly complicated geophysical condition of our planet to a more paradoxical interpretation of what a human is and what the reasons for his existence are.
Let us look around. And I will say this again: I will allow myself to express a few thoughts that I sign on to.
Firstly, climate change and environmental degradation are so obvious that even the most careless people can no longer dismiss them. One can continue to engage in scientific debates about the mechanisms behind the ongoing processes, but it is impossible to deny that these processes are getting worse, and something needs to be done. Natural disasters such as droughts, floods, hurricanes, and tsunamis have almost become the new normal, and we are getting used to them. Suffice it to recall the devastating, tragic floods in Europe last summer, the fires in Siberia – there are a lot of examples. Not only in Siberia – our neighbours in Turkey have also had wildfires, and the United States, and other places on the American continent. It sometimes seems that any geopolitical, scientific and technical, or ideological rivalry becomes pointless in this context, if the winners will have not enough air to breathe or nothing to drink.
The coronavirus pandemic has become another reminder of how fragile our community is, how vulnerable it is, and our most important task is to ensure humanity a safe existence and resilience. To increase our chance of survival in the face of cataclysms, we absolutely need to rethink how we go about our lives, how we run our households, how cities develop or how they should develop; we need to reconsider economic development priorities of entire states. I repeat, safety is one of our main imperatives, in any case it has become obvious now, and anyone who tries to deny this will have to later explain why they were wrong and why they were unprepared for the crises and shocks whole nations are facing.
Second. The socioeconomic problems facing humankind have worsened to the point where, in the past, they would trigger worldwide shocks, such as world wars or bloody social cataclysms. Everyone is saying that the current model of capitalism which underlies the social structure in the overwhelming majority of countries, has run its course and no longer offers a solution to a host of increasingly tangled differences.
Everywhere, even in the richest countries and regions, the uneven distribution of material wealth has exacerbated inequality, primarily, inequality of opportunities both within individual societies and at the international level. I mentioned this formidable challenge in my remarks at the Davos Forum earlier this year. No doubt, these problems threaten us with major and deep social divisions.
Furthermore, a number of countries and even entire regions are regularly hit by food crises. We will probably discuss this later, but there is every reason to believe that this crisis will become worse in the near future and may reach extreme forms. There are also shortages of water and electricity (we will probably cover this today as well), not to mention poverty, high unemployment rates or lack of adequate healthcare.
Lagging countries are fully aware of that and are losing faith in the prospects of ever catching up with the leaders. Disappointment spurs aggression and pushes people to join the ranks of extremists. People in these countries have a growing sense of unfulfilled and failed expectations and the lack of any opportunities not only for themselves, but for their children, as well. This is what makes them look for better lives and results in uncontrolled migration, which, in turn, creates fertile ground for social discontent in more prosperous countries. I do not need to explain anything to you, since you can see everything with your own eyes and are, probably, versed on these matters even better than I.
As I noted earlier, prosperous leading powers have other pressing social problems, challenges and risks in ample supply, and many among them are no longer interested in fighting for influence since, as they say, they already have enough on their plates. The fact that society and young people in many countries have overreacted in a harsh and even aggressive manner to measures to combat the coronavirus showed – and I want to emphasise this, I hope someone has already mentioned this before me at other venues – so, I think that this reaction showed that the pandemic was just a pretext: the causes for social irritation and frustration run much deeper.
I have another important point to make. The pandemic, which, in theory, was supposed to rally the people in the fight against this massive common threat, has instead become a divisive rather than a unifying factor. There are many reasons for that, but one of the main ones is that they started looking for solutions to problems among the usual approaches – a variety of them, but still the old ones, but they just do not work. Or, to be more precise, they do work, but often and oddly enough, they worsen the existing state of affairs.
By the way, Russia has repeatedly called for, and I will repeat this, stopping these inappropriate ambitions and for working together. We will probably talk about this later but it is clear what I have in mind. We are talking about the need to counter the coronavirus infection together. But nothing changes; everything remains the same despite the humanitarian considerations. I am not referring to Russia now, let’s leave the sanctions against Russia for now; I mean the sanctions that remain in place against those states that badly need international assistance. Where are the humanitarian fundamentals of Western political thought? It appears there is nothing there, just idle talk. Do you understand? This is what seems to be on the surface.
Furthermore, the technological revolution, impressive achievements in artificial intelligence, electronics, communications, genetics, bioengineering, and medicine open up enormous opportunities, but at the same time, in practical terms, they raise philosophical, moral and spiritual questions that were until recently the exclusive domain of science fiction writers. What will happen if machines surpass humans in the ability to think? Where is the limit of interference in the human body beyond which a person ceases being himself and turns into some other entity? What are the general ethical limits in the world where the potential of science and machines are becoming almost boundless? What will this mean for each of us, for our descendants, our nearest descendants – our children and grandchildren?
These changes are gaining momentum, and they certainly cannot be stopped because they are objective as a rule. All of us will have to deal with the consequences regardless of our political systems, economic condition or prevailing ideology.
Verbally, all states talk about their commitment to the ideals of cooperation and a willingness to work together for resolving common problems but, unfortunately, these are just words. In reality, the opposite is happening, and the pandemic has served to fuel the negative trends that emerged long ago and are now only getting worse. The approach based on the proverb, “your own shirt is closer to the body,” has finally become common and is now no longer even concealed. Moreover, this is often even a matter of boasting and brandishing. Egotistic interests prevail over the notion of the common good.
Of course, the problem is not just the ill will of certain states and notorious elites. It is more complicated than that, in my opinion. In general, life is seldom divided into black and white. Every government, every leader is primarily responsible to his own compatriots, obviously. The main goal is to ensure their security, peace and prosperity. So, international, transnational issues will never be as important for a national leadership as domestic stability. In general, this is normal and correct.
We need to face the fact the global governance institutions are not always effective and their capabilities are not always up to the challenge posed by the dynamics of global processes. In this sense, the pandemic could help – it clearly showed which institutions have what it takes and which need fine-tuning.
The re-alignment of the balance of power presupposes a redistribution of shares in favour of rising and developing countries that until now felt left out. To put it bluntly, the Western domination of international affairs, which began several centuries ago and, for a short period, was almost absolute in the late 20th century, is giving way to a much more diverse system.
This transformation is not a mechanical process and, in its own way, one might even say, is unparalleled. Arguably, political history has no examples of a stable world order being established without a big war and its outcomes as the basis, as was the case after World War II. So, we have a chance to create an extremely favourable precedent. The attempt to create it after the end of the Cold War on the basis of Western domination failed, as we see. The current state of international affairs is a product of that very failure, and we must learn from this.
Some may wonder, what have we arrived at? We have arrived somewhere paradoxical. Just an example: for two decades, the most powerful nation in the world has been conducting military campaigns in two countries that it cannot be compared to by any standard. But in the end, it had to wind down operations without achieving a single goal that it had set for itself going in 20 years ago, and to withdraw from these countries causing considerable damage to others and itself. In fact, the situation has worsened dramatically.
But that is not the point. Previously, a war lost by one side meant victory for the other side, which took responsibility for what was happening. For example, the defeat of the United States in the Vietnam War, for example, did not make Vietnam a “black hole.” On the contrary, a successfully developing state arose there, which, admittedly, relied on the support of a strong ally. Things are different now: no matter who takes the upper hand, the war does not stop, but just changes form. As a rule, the hypothetical winner is reluctant or unable to ensure peaceful post-war recovery, and only worsens the chaos and the vacuum posing a danger to the world.
Colleagues,
What do you think are the starting points of this complex realignment process? Let me try to summarise the talking points.
First, the coronavirus pandemic has clearly shown that the international order is structured around nation states. By the way, recent developments have shown that global digital platforms – with all their might, which we could see from the internal political processes in the United States – have failed to usurp political or state functions. These attempts proved ephemeral. The US authorities, as I said, have immediately put the owners of these platforms in their place, which is exactly what is being done in Europe, if you just look at the size of the fines imposed on them and the demonopolisation measures being taken. You are aware of that.
In recent decades, many have tossed around fancy concepts claiming that the role of the state was outdated and outgoing. Globalisation supposedly made national borders an anachronism, and sovereignty an obstacle to prosperity. You know, I said it before and I will say it again. This is also what was said by those who attempted to open up other countries’ borders for the benefit of their own competitive advantages. This is what actually happened. And as soon as it transpired that someone somewhere is achieving great results, they immediately returned to closing borders in general and, first of all, their own customs borders and what have you, and started building walls. Well, were we supposed to not notice, or what? Everyone sees everything and everyone understands everything perfectly well. Of course, they do.
There is no point in disputing it anymore. It is obvious. But events, when we spoke about the need to open up borders, events, as I said, went in the opposite direction. Only sovereign states can effectively respond to the challenges of the times and the demands of the citizens. Accordingly, any effective international order should take into account the interests and capabilities of the state and proceed on that basis, and not try to prove that they should not exist. Furthermore, it is impossible to impose anything on anyone, be it the principles underlying the sociopolitical structure or values that someone, for their own reasons, has called universal. After all, it is clear that when a real crisis strikes, there is only one universal value left and that is human life, which each state decides for itself how best to protect based on its abilities, culture and traditions.
In this regard, I will again note how severe and dangerous the coronavirus pandemic has become. As we know, more than 4.9 million have died of it. These terrifying figures are comparable and even exceed the military losses of the main participants in World War I.
The second point I would like to draw your attention to is the scale of change that forces us to act extremely cautiously, if only for reasons of self-preservation. The state and society must not respond radically to qualitative shifts in technology, dramatic environmental changes or the destruction of traditional systems. It is easier to destroy than to create, as we all know. We in Russia know this very well, regrettably, from our own experience, which we have had several times.
Just over a century ago, Russia objectively faced serious problems, including because of the ongoing World War I, but its problems were not bigger and possibly even smaller or not as acute as the problems the other countries faced, and Russia could have dealt with its problems gradually and in a civilised manner. But revolutionary shocks led to the collapse and disintegration of a great power. The second time this happened 30 years ago, when a potentially very powerful nation failed to enter the path of urgently needed, flexible but thoroughly substantiated reforms at the right time, and as a result it fell victim to all kinds of dogmatists, both reactionary ones and the so-called progressives – all of them did their bit, all sides did.
These examples from our history allow us to say that revolutions are not a way to settle a crisis but a way to aggravate it. No revolution was worth the damage it did to the human potential.
Third. The importance of a solid support in the sphere of morals, ethics and values is increasing dramatically in the modern fragile world. In point of fact, values are a product, a unique product of cultural and historical development of any nation. The mutual interlacing of nations definitely enriches them, openness expands their horizons and allows them to take a fresh look at their own traditions. But the process must be organic, and it can never be rapid. Any alien elements will be rejected anyway, possibly bluntly. Any attempts to force one’s values on others with an uncertain and unpredictable outcome can only further complicate a dramatic situation and usually produce the opposite reaction and an opposite from the intended result.
We look in amazement at the processes underway in the countries which have been traditionally looked at as the standard-bearers of progress. Of course, the social and cultural shocks that are taking place in the United States and Western Europe are none of our business; we are keeping out of this. Some people in the West believe that an aggressive elimination of entire pages from their own history, “reverse discrimination” against the majority in the interests of a minority, and the demand to give up the traditional notions of mother, father, family and even gender, they believe that all of these are the mileposts on the path towards social renewal.
Listen, I would like to point out once again that they have a right to do this, we are keeping out of this. But we would like to ask them to keep out of our business as well. We have a different viewpoint, at least the overwhelming majority of Russian society – it would be more correct to put it this way – has a different opinion on this matter. We believe that we must rely on our own spiritual values, our historical tradition and the culture of our multiethnic nation.
The advocates of so-called ‘social progress’ believe they are introducing humanity to some kind of a new and better consciousness. Godspeed, hoist the flags as we say, go right ahead. The only thing that I want to say now is that their prescriptions are not new at all. It may come as a surprise to some people, but Russia has been there already. After the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks, relying on the dogmas of Marx and Engels, also said that they would change existing ways and customs and not just political and economic ones, but the very notion of human morality and the foundations of a healthy society. The destruction of age-old values, religion and relations between people, up to and including the total rejection of family (we had that, too), encouragement to inform on loved ones – all this was proclaimed progress and, by the way, was widely supported around the world back then and was quite fashionable, same as today. By the way, the Bolsheviks were absolutely intolerant of opinions other than theirs.
This, I believe, should call to mind some of what we are witnessing now. Looking at what is happening in a number of Western countries, we are amazed to see the domestic practices, which we, fortunately, have left, I hope, in the distant past. The fight for equality and against discrimination has turned into aggressive dogmatism bordering on absurdity, when the works of the great authors of the past – such as Shakespeare – are no longer taught at schools or universities, because their ideas are believed to be backward. The classics are declared backward and ignorant of the importance of gender or race. In Hollywood memos are distributed about proper storytelling and how many characters of what colour or gender should be in a movie. This is even worse than the agitprop department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
Countering acts of racism is a necessary and noble cause, but the new ‘cancel culture’ has turned it into ‘reverse discrimination’ that is, reverse racism. The obsessive emphasis on race is further dividing people, when the real fighters for civil rights dreamed precisely about erasing differences and refusing to divide people by skin colour. I specifically asked my colleagues to find the following quote from Martin Luther King: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by their character.” This is the true value. However, things are turning out differently there. By the way, the absolute majority of Russian people do not think that the colour of a person’s skin or their gender is an important matter. Each of us is a human being. This is what matters.
In a number of Western countries, the debate over men’s and women’s rights has turned into a perfect phantasmagoria. Look, beware of going where the Bolsheviks once planned to go – not only communalising chickens, but also communalising women. One more step and you will be there.
Zealots of these new approaches even go so far as to want to abolish these concepts altogether. Anyone who dares mention that men and women actually exist, which is a biological fact, risk being ostracised. “Parent number one” and “parent number two,” “’birthing parent” instead of “mother,” and “human milk” replacing “breastmilk” because it might upset the people who are unsure about their own gender. I repeat, this is nothing new; in the 1920s, the so-called Soviet Kulturtraegers also invented some newspeak believing they were creating a new consciousness and changing values that way. And, as I have already said, they made such a mess it still makes one shudder at times.
Not to mention some truly monstrous things when children are taught from an early age that a boy can easily become a girl and vice versa. That is, the teachers actually impose on them a choice we all supposedly have. They do so while shutting the parents out of the process and forcing the child to make decisions that can upend their entire life. They do not even bother to consult with child psychologists – is a child at this age even capable of making a decision of this kind? Calling a spade a spade, this verges on a crime against humanity, and it is being done in the name and under the banner of progress.
Well, if someone likes this, let them do it. I have already mentioned that, in shaping our approaches, we will be guided by a healthy conservatism. That was a few years ago, when passions on the international arena were not yet running as high as they are now, although, of course, we can say that clouds were gathering even then. Now, when the world is going through a structural disruption, the importance of reasonable conservatism as the foundation for a political course has skyrocketed – precisely because of the multiplying risks and dangers, and the fragility of the reality around us.
This conservative approach is not about an ignorant traditionalism, a fear of change or a restraining game, much less about withdrawing into our own shell. It is primarily about reliance on a time-tested tradition, the preservation and growth of the population, a realistic assessment of oneself and others, a precise alignment of priorities, a correlation of necessity and possibility, a prudent formulation of goals, and a fundamental rejection of extremism as a method. And frankly, in the impending period of global reconstruction, which may take quite long, with its final design being uncertain, moderate conservatism is the most reasonable line of conduct, as far as I see it. It will inevitably change at some point, but so far, do no harm – the guiding principle in medicine – seems to be the most rational one. Noli nocere, as they say.
Again, for us in Russia, these are not some speculative postulates, but lessons from our difficult and sometimes tragic history. The cost of ill-conceived social experiments is sometimes beyond estimation. Such actions can destroy not only the material, but also the spiritual foundations of human existence, leaving behind moral wreckage where nothing can be built to replace it for a long time.
Finally, there is one more point I want to make. We understand all too well that resolving many urgent problems the world has been facing would be impossible without close international cooperation. However, we need to be realistic: most of the pretty slogans about coming up with global solutions to global problems that we have been hearing since the late 20th century will never become reality. In order to achieve a global solution, states and people have to transfer their sovereign rights to supra-national structures to an extent that few, if any, would accept. This is primarily attributable to the fact that you have to answer for the outcomes of such policies not to some global public, but to your citizens and voters.
However, this does not mean that exercising some restraint for the sake of bringing about solutions to global challenges is impossible. After all, a global challenge is a challenge for all of us together, and to each of us in particular. If everyone saw a way to benefit from cooperation in overcoming these challenges, this would definitely leave us better equipped to work together.
One of the ways to promote these efforts could be, for example, to draw up, at the UN level, a list of challenges and threats that specific countries face, with details of how they could affect other countries. This effort could involve experts from various countries and academic fields, including you, my colleagues. We believe that developing a roadmap of this kind could inspire many countries to see global issues in a new light and understand how cooperation could be beneficial for them.
I have already mentioned the challenges international institutions are facing. Unfortunately, this is an obvious fact: it is now a question of reforming or closing some of them. However, the United Nations as the central international institution retains its enduring value, at least for now. I believe that in our turbulent world it is the UN that brings a touch of reasonable conservatism into international relations, something that is so important for normalising the situation.
Many criticise the UN for failing to adapt to a rapidly changing world. In part, this is true, but it is not the UN, but primarily its members who are to blame for this. In addition, this international body promotes not only international norms, but also the rule-making spirit, which is based on the principles of equality and maximum consideration for everyone’s opinions. Our mission is to preserve this heritage while reforming the organisation. However, in doing so we need to make sure that we do not throw the baby out with the bathwater, as the saying goes.
This is not the first time I am using a high rostrum to make this call for collective action in order to face up to the problems that continue to pile up and become more acute. It is thanks to you, friends and colleagues, that the Valdai Club is emerging or has already established itself as a high-profile forum. It is for this reason that I am turning to this platform to reaffirm our readiness to work together on addressing the most urgent problems that the world is facing today.
Friends,
The changes mentioned here prior to me, as well as by yours truly, are relevant to all countries and peoples. Russia, of course, is not an exception. Just like everyone else, we are searching for answers to the most urgent challenges of our time.
Of course, no one has any ready-made recipes. However, I would venture to say that our country has an advantage. Let me explain what this advantage is. It is to do with our historical experience. You may have noticed that I have referred to it several times in the course of my remarks. Unfortunately, we had to bring back many sad memories, but at least our society has developed what they now refer to as herd immunity to extremism that paves the way to upheavals and socioeconomic cataclysms. People really value stability and being able to live normal lives and to prosper while confident that the irresponsible aspirations of yet another group of revolutionaries will not upend their plans and aspirations. Many have vivid memories of what happened 30 years ago and all the pain it took to climb out of the ditch where our country and our society found themselves after the USSR fell apart.
The conservative views we hold are an optimistic conservatism, which is what matters the most. We believe stable, positive development to be possible. It all depends primarily on our own efforts. Of course, we are ready to work with our partners on common noble causes.
I would like to thank all participants once more, for your attention. As the tradition goes, I will gladly answer or at least try to answer your questions.
Thank you for your patience.
[ end ]
[ Wolf here ]
Before we even get started, note how much the intelligence of that speech differs from our phony President Biden. It’s even smarter than speech-making puppet and ACTUAL President, Barack Obama.
Now – don’t think for a SECOND that Mr. Putin isn’t one VERY cagey cat who’s looking to eat that singing caged bird when nobody is looking.
From the moment Putin shills for phony Globo-Soviet China-helping “climate change”, you know he’s not in it to speak the truth unless that truth benefits Russia.
Yeah, you can say that he’s “playing along with the Globalists”, but why is that?
RUSSIA FIRST. It is smarter for him to play along openly on a strategy that harms America more than Russia, and overtly helps China, than to flip that around and make his own country suffer, merely for credit with a few opponents of globalism in a primary globalist adversary (meaning the United States).
Never for a moment think this guy is saying anything to help America – unless it helps Russia first.
This is part of nationalism, or at least Russia’s version of it. Just accept that, IMO.
From there, also understand that Putin is always looking out for China, too. Russia and China will always have a very complex relationship, where mutual suspicions and mutual courtesies include NEVER saying the wrong thing, risking destabilizing that relationship, and always upholding each other’s SCAMS.
OK? Got that?
The TRUTH only goes so far with Putin. After that, it’s RUSSIA FIRST, LIES OR NO LIES.
Nevertheless, Putin goes on to provide an AMAZING set of NON-HYPOCRITICAL arguments:
FOR nationalism
FOR conservatism
FOR sovereignty
AGAINST wokism
AGAINST “racist anti-racism”
AGAINST tyranny of the minority
AGAINST Bolshevism
AGAINST extremism
AGAINST gender / sexual minority insanity
AGAINST Western liberal excess
AGAINST revolution
AGAINST transhumanism
AGAINST destruction of society
This is exactly what Sundance is saying. Putin has jumped off his bear, and has GRABBED credibility by both horns, and is milking the bull for all the national macho it will provide!
Corrupt, Soviet-honeymooning, dementia-addled weakling Biden, selling out to China, has given Russia an extraordinary opportunity to recover Soviet-era levels of prominence on the world stage – but without all the stinky Bolshevik baggage of old. Full of fleas and bedbugs, that baggage was gladly taken off Russia’s hands by Democrat doufuses and traitors.
In my opinion, this is exactly where Russia wants things.
I have more opinions, but I will save those for the comments.
What do YOU think of Putin’s speech?
W
Civil rights as distinct from minority tyranny. What a concept! Wonder where that started?
It’s a simple question, but I think it needs to be asked.
My money says Her Slyness, Queen Jussie of Pelosi, is going to do what Chris Wray KNOWS is destroying the FBI – the harassment of patriotic Americans for going to THEIR Capitol and registering the MILD REBUKE of YELLING outside the Capitol Building, while TREASON ruled the day on the inside.
And that would be TWO kinds of treason.
(1) The phony, fake, stolen election, working with CHINA, on November 3, 2020.
(2) The Jussie Smollett-style FRAME JOB on Trump and his supporters on January 6, 2021.
Yeah, when I read this thing about Pelosi setting up what will amount to Capitol Hill Police FIELD OFFICES around the nation, at first I thought it was a strong move for Mobbie Dearest.
CRAZY LIKE A FOX.
But THEN I realized how this is REALLY playing.
CRAZY LIKE A MOONBAT.
Jussie Pelosi, partner in crime with the FBI on January Sixth, is UNWILLING to leave well enough alone what Chris Wray knows is DESTROYING the reputation of the FBI.
And Chris Wray has the goods to say “NO” to Jussie Pelosi. You’d better believe it.
Impeachahontas Now Wearing Two Diapers Nobody expected Chris Wray to play Mafia Nan’s queen of diapers face-up on January 6, but that is exactly what appears to have happened. The only question now is WHY. To quote a friend from a former life, “AYE-YI-YI!” OK – let me back up a bit. First, I want …
See, I didn’t really get why Wray made a rather eloquent “nicey-nice threat” to expose Pelosi’s mafia and red diaper roots (by dropping a CLEAN version) on January Sixth.
Now it’s obvious. Wray has the FREEDOM to protect the FBI from Pelosi’s insanity, which would DESTROY the reputation of the FBI even MORE than she has already done.
In fact, I think that even DODGE (that would be DOJ) may be jumping off the crazy, burning, Pelosi wagon.
Is she MAD? Is she CRAZY?
I stole this great image from Sundance, and that gives me the opportunity to push you to read his very wise thoughts on this latest sinister genius from Donna Gambino Lucchese D’Alesandro Pelosi.
I strongly advise that you read the whole thing, because the END is very important, and I have not cited it here. Whether your thoughts lean toward HOPIUM or NOPIUM, something is coming. Sundance sees this as proactive federal preparation for it. His rationale is strong, and I am in full agreement.
So does this mean she will REALLY go after the “January 6 small fry”?
I think that’s a very good question. I mean, Congress could decide to rein her in – or not. States could decide to cooperate with this – OR NOT. Indeed, I think there are already some states and counties that SAY they are prepared to ARREST federal officers regarded as taking unconstitutional actions against residents.
And I think that Nancy “Jussie” Pelosi knows EXACTLY THAT – and is adopting a policy of CHALLENGING STATES.
And THIS is where we get into the GUILT of Nancy Pelosi, and how she ALWAYS operates like this when her guilt is building because the TRUTH is showing.
Indeed, I think only the probable pedophile Adam Schiff, friend of Ed Buck, is more POWERFUL in his attacks on those who have the goods on him, than Nancy Pelosi.
Look back at those impeachments. Pelosi and Schiff – THEY are the ones who attack with the full force of the federal government, and the full demonic chutzpah of the most brazen and Orwellian lies, at the first sign of their own weakness.
Jussie Pelosi knows that BUFFALO BOY’S headgear is in every possible way, HER version of Jussie Smollett’s MAGA hats.
But there is ONE MORE TREAT that I want to offer, and that will be my next post.
Have a nice heaping helping of JUSSIE PELOSI here, but save some room for a side of JUSSIE KINZINGER.
This is a HEADS UP to all authentic American patriots about our phony globo-nazi “friends” in DOJ and FBI, otherwise known as “Dodge” and “FIB”.
Let me give you the TL;DR right here.
The Bidenistas and Bidenazis are going to try to GO CANADA during however long they remain in power. “FIB” is going to be an integral part of the harassment. Expect FIB to escalate in response to their own phony accusations against “domestic violent extremists”. That is how the incremental tyranny works. And when audits threaten the fake election, expect it to get REALLY BAD.
You can glean this out of a combination of recent Biden orders and policy statements on dealing with “domestic extremists” (that would be us loyal Americans), and what the deeply corrupt DOJ, through the FBI, is now doing to gently extend the pool of harassables, who are getting the “20 machine gun, broken front door” treatment. Short story – people who are not even being CHARGED are getting VIOLENTLY raided.
So far, FIB has done an “excellent” job (using NAZI criteria here about what is “excellent”) of keeping the political aspect of what they do beneath the obviously and easily accusable. One thing that has been done, at a policy level, is to not engage in prosecutions of January 6 “domestic extremists” except when those people either entered the capitol building TRAP itself, or engaged in actual violence outside the building. This is essential for them to maintain the false narrative of “domestic extremists” by omission of the vast majority of Trump supporters who were there, peacefully protesting the TREASON which happened INSIDE the capitol.
TREASON which the deeply political KGB-FBI helped set up, and in some cases, actually helped commit.
One seeming exception to this policy was the “high-valued political target” of “Walk Away” movement founder Brandon Straka, who has been REMARKABLY QUIET of late, as was clearly intended by prosecuting him.
Straka was immediately shut down on Facebook after January 6 – his sites and groups being completely eliminated on January 8. Sundance had great coverage of this:
Extreme control efforts are a reaction to extreme fear. If the left-wing political elements who control most social media platforms were not fearful they would not be taking such aggressive action. Today Brandon Straka announces his #WalkAway group has been removed from Facebook and deplatformed.
Then, on January 25, Straka was arrested in Omaha, Nebraska. After two days in jail, he was let out. A flurry of mainstream Fake News articles appeared – then nothing. Again, Sundance covered it:
Despite the weak evidence outlined in the indictment, this looks like a case of specific DOJ and FBI targeting of political voices. The regime will not be opposed…
Brandon Straka was the founder of the #WalkAway movement. He was also a key organizer for the Stop the Steal group during the January 6th political protest in Washington DC.
WASHINGTON DC – A prominent activist in the Stop the Steal movement who spoke at a rally held by backers of President Donald Trump in Washington the day before the storming of the Capitol was arrested on Monday on charges that he took part in the riot.
Brandon Straka, 44, was arrested on a felony charge of interfering with police during civil disorder. The self-described founder of a movement to “walk away” from liberalism was also charged with unlawful entry into a restricted building and disorderly conduct.
An FBI agent’s affidavit used to obtain a criminal complaint against Straka describes his role as an organizer of Stop the Steal and quotes his comments at the Jan. 5 rally held at Freedom Plaza, but doesn’t indicate whether the government views those activities as context for his actions at the Capitol or part of the alleged crimes.
The charging documents are HERE. The transactions of Straka’s case are listed HERE. You can see that his case was continued to May 26. Apparently on May 25 his case was continued AGAIN for another 3 months. During that time, Straka ONLY broke his silence in a Facebook live podcast / video to his supporters on the occasion of the re-continuation, which video was later REMOVED – reason unknown. Details of his brief message are HERE and in more detail HERE.
Brandon Straka also has a website – https://brandonstraka.com/ – which has ZERO information about the case, and doesn’t even appear to have much recent information AT ALL. All people with any questions are directed to his site – which says nothing.
The details of the case are interesting. It is very debatable whether Straka did anything other than “almost” going into the capitol building, by being in a crowd near a doorway which was successfully BLOCKED by Capitol Hill Police. Basically, Straka was in behind others who were pushing and shoving and trying to get in. You can read the charging documents and linked articles. I am of no opinion about what Straka did or didn’t do, but I am also of the opinion that DOJ is going after him, because he was a rally speaker on January 5, along with General Mike Flynn, and “Dodge” is still desperate to go after Flynn.
Now it is clear that Dodge and FIB have gone after people who merely walked inside the building, in some cases without any warning or opposition, and in a subset of those cases, literally invited in by Capitol Hill Police. It is generally observed and understood that people who did NOT enter the Capitol, and who did NOT engage in violence, or otherwise attempt to “breach” the building, have not been charged.
YET.
Prosecution seems a bit uneven, however, within the group which only entered the building and behaved courteously. Some of those “insurgents” had completely civilized encounters with FIB, although in some of those cases, with laughably large numbers of agents and local law enforcement present. I won’t give any further details, lest some of the more enthusiastic Bidenazis decide those poor innocents need more trouble because they didn’t get enough. Because that’s how Nazis THINK and ACT.
However, in other cases, such as Dr. Simone Gold, the head of a doctor’s group (AFLD) supporting use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin to treat COVID-19, there has been a ridiculous amount of intimidating force used.
Yeah, we’ve got a real Bonnie and Clyde there, my friends.
Welcome to communism by a MINORITY PARTY. I guess maybe they really are “Mensheviks”.
The arrest of Dr. Gold was NOT benign. HERE is coverage at Gateway Pundit, originally HERE, with information from an interview with Michelle Malkin.
In describing this incident, Gold said, “I was paid a visit by the FBI in a Roger Stone kind of take down moment, which is quite uncalled for. You know, if anybody wanted to get a hold of me, they could have picked up the phone and called. I’m very easy to find. But there were literally twenty guys with guns blazing, [and they] broke down my door,” Gold said.
“It was dramatic and what I want to say is that I weep for our country. If you can pull in a person like me … [and] have the FBI break down your door with 20 guns, shackle you [in] handcuffs [and] drag you off, I mean it was really terrible … I’m telling you America, this can happen to you.”
Here is the interview:
Now, while it’s pretty clear that Straka and Gold were “high-value political targets”, it was looking like something I knew was going to happen, was not happening yet. Until now.
I knew that eventually the terribly corrupt and politicized “Dodge” would go after ALL patriots who were in Washington that day. ALL of them. They would not do so at first, but as the Soviet American communists – Bidenistas – Bidenazis – globo-nazis – WHATEVER – tightened control over America, they would ESCALATE.
OK? I want EVERYBODY who was in Washington to understand that. They will come for you EVENTUALLY. So you need to have a PLAN.
Worse yet, they are eventually going to start leaning on people who simply KNOW people who were in Washington. Yup. If you know me, as in have ever showed up on our site here, they are going to LEAN ON YOU. It cannot be stopped, unless THEY are stopped.
My mother didn’t live through the Nazis, and teach me all about them, to let this kind of information just sit with me alone, doing no good. I am giving all of you the earliest warning possible, so that you can be READY when they show up at your door. HAVE A PLAN.
Don’t tell me what you’re going to do. Let THEM worry about that.
Although, until you have a plan, THIS WORKS.
This is MUST-SEE video. I recommend watching it MANY TIMES, so that you have an INGRAINED RESPONSE. My recommendation is to psychologically prepare yourself against the regime by watching this over and over and over again.
Now, here is the kicker. Here is where they start raiding people who are NOT being arrested.
It’s imperative to read through this all, because of two points you need to watch for:
(1) The vaccine connection
(2) People being investigated for SOCIAL MEDIA CONNECTIONS
Now – I find it extremely interesting that this guy was INSIDE the Capitol Building, but he is not being charged. This immediately brings up the suspicion that it’s RACIAL-POLITICAL – that he is not being charged – ironically – because he’s black. Either THAT or lawyers are already getting charges DROPPED for some arrested protesters due to evidence that protesters were being ALLOWED IN or even ENCOURAGED to enter the Capitol Building. But if that is the case, why raid him at all?
I am starting to think that the most important part seems to be the ANTI-VAXX connection. Note that Massaquoi is NOT a friend or associate of “Baked Alaska” – he simply showed up in Baked’s videos.
The whole thing screams politics. One of the FEW places where Hollywood seems to buck the leftist establishment is on vaccination. Thus, I am thinking that this is a BIG reason they are going after him. Yet, at the same time, for all of Hollywood and all of Fake News Journalism, and frankly for all of DOJ and FBI as well, being “Blackque” is deserving of special treatment. I think, in that world, at the most cynical interpretation, they know DAMN WELL that arresting a BLACKQUE MAN for anti-vaxx in Hollywood, would whip up a firestorm – ironically one of their own making. Thus, they decided to drop him into a kind of “material witness” status, so that they could “deliver the message” without taking political risks on the left.
And THAT brings us back to THIS SITE.
We have been leading the way on a lot of VIRUS and VACCINE reporting. We NAILED the spike protein. We called out the magnetic disinformation, and our side has been INOCULATED against the ploys of the left. We are a target. I think there was big hope that we would swallow the “magnetic vaccine” crap and be discredited. Instead, we turned that around.
My first response to the magnetic stuff, while bobbling the ball, was to hint back at technological possibilities which would trigger their greed – basically a kind of “radar”. While that picture was resolving, I looked at the “magnetic vaccine” problem and came to the conclusion that it was disinformation being used to discredit the most susceptible (no pun originally intended) critics of the spike protein vaccines. There is still an enormous amount of very interesting science there, but it’s a distraction – even a risk – because it’s easily thrown into the bad context of the “Magnet Challenge”. Right now, we need to make them pay for what they did, and secure FREEDOM.
Also, they are going to try this COVID crap again. There are appropriate responses. I’m sure our people have some ideas of what they are. And that’s all I’m saying. But trust me, they will pull some crap like that again. Biden said so – literally – another pandemic is coming. All the boardroom bozos can feel smart saying that, for the wrong reasons. It’s coming because the last one WORKED.
We have to be the spoke-bending, tire-stopping, vehicle-crashing STEEL BAR that brings down the next phony plannedemic.
Are you with me? GOOD.
Now – because we’ve been scoring so many hits on the other side, on the virus and the vaccine, and helping unmask all this crap, and because we could seriously interfere with their NEXT plannedemic, they WILL come after us. It’s only a matter of WHEN – barring JUSTICE FOR THE FAKE ELECTION. And THAT will not be pretty, either. Expect raids related to THAT as well.
This is for the historical record. I hope that this analysis gets to the “dissident scientists” involved, but even if it never does, future historians will get a powerful look at what I call “Fake Science” – the establishment’s phony, deceptive and controlled scientific complex – and how infiltration, control, and discreditation of dissident populist …
You will recall that I located the point where the “suramin error” was dropped in front of the right people to be uploaded to the prominent doctors of the anti-vaxx community, prior to the “magnet challenge” disinformation being similarly uploaded, and then used to discredit them in the Daily Mail.
Part of the suramin attack involved a highly edited video of Judy Mikovits touting suramin, minus the full information about that drug. That video, in combination with erroneous assertions about suramin being in pine tree needles, resulted in the physicians who are currently prominent warning about the COVID vaccines, picking up the error and discrediting themselves in their very current and very popular videos about the gynecological and shedding problems of the persistent and migratory spike protein vaccines.
Well, that video which was used to misinform them has been removed.
Sunlight. It cures quite a bit all on its own.
More seriously, I realized that, at some level there, probably in the background, I was dealing with pro “influencers of influencers of influencers”. I won’t be sharing all my information on that, as much as I would love to, but it became apparent that they are watching us like hawks. Speaking of which…..
2.
The Sleeper Has Awakened
Yes, Sundance just came out with a piece critical of the COVID vaccines. You will recall that SD and his crew were all fairly pro-vaxx, so this tells me there is a fundamental shift going on.
And while the fact that the HHS entrance to VAERS went down at the same time SD came out with this article may very well just be coincidence, I am 100% certain that the policy of Barack Obama and Eric Holder is BACK IN PLACE under Merrick “Whatever You Say, Barack” Garland, and that journalists like Sundance (and ourselves) are being SPIED ON by the federal government, in a abuse of power for political purposes.
SO – anyway – keep an eye on CTH in regard to things “COVID” – there is going to be some good stuff there, I’m willing to bet.
[Just for the record, I wrote this BEFORE the recent CTH post about “QAnon” stuff, which I happen to regard as a very helpful warning, but which was “not received warmly” by most on this site. I’m not looking to exacerbate the situation, but I hate “spiking” anything – for anybody. And I’m going to be very blunt. Sundance is going to have THE BEST coverage of DOJ asshattery against our site, so prepare to see me using a LOT of his coverage in my postings and reasoning. People need to learn to keep their emotions in check, because that is how an army survives – digital or otherwise. WWG1WGA begins with YOU.]
3.
Scientists Are Calling Out The Snakes
Everybody is seeing how people are calling out FAUCI, but in my opinion that’s actually a side-show. The REAL DEAL is scientists calling out the scientific BULLSHIT about COVID, and particularly the spike protein nuttery that was imposed on us. At long last, people in Scienceville are going “WHAT THE #### IS GOING ON?”
First, a video that came to us via Grandmaintexas and this link:
It’s worth listening to the beginning of this video to hear this dude list off his credentials. This guy isn’t just some country doctor. Nor is he old, senile, or out-of-date on current medicine. Just listen to him. This dude is IMPRESSIVE. He’s still sharp as a tack, just like Trump. I would almost say “more”, at the risk of offending some who believe this is not possible! Just listen to him.
Among many other jaw-droppers of sensible scientific perspective, this video basically tells you why I have been so mouth-agape about that Pfizer data snagged back into American science from JAPAN.
You have to look closely at it, but not THAT closely.
The VIDEO adds more about testicular localization in males.
Yeah, boys. It ain’t just the broads. Cross those legs – this is gonna make you cringe like a prostate exam.
One of the things which is EXTREMELY NOTEWORTHY about the video is that this lady YouTuber / Facebooker / BitChuter and all-around “social media presenter” goes into deep detail about the extreme censorship she is encountering, and how she deals with it.
For example, she states that the YouTube video was taken down in about 10 minutes.
Alternatively, you can listen to some different scientists in THIS great video, thanks to singingsoul.
Here we have Bret Weinstein interviewing a doctor and an engineer who explain – to the satisfaction of any honest scientist – WHY the mRNA vaccines (and to a lesser extent, the adenoviral vector vaccines) are CLEARLY problematic.
This is EXACTLY the same stuff we’ve been talking about. And it will be extremely useful in getting to where we are going, looking at NEW VACCINES COMING.
I’ll give you a hint now – the new vaccines could be a strong correction, back to what vaccines SHOULD be – or they could just be a slower and stealthier path to get us where the cabal has us going now – elite-controlled social contraception, and immunity debt enslavement – which is the worst-case future of “vaccine capture” a la Marek.
So – let me review previous posting, mostly mine, but also Deplorable Patriot’s reachy but prophetic question about the incredible and previously unthinkable idea of vaccine shedding. All of it based on what YOU, our loyal posters, brought here for the group to digest.
Take a bow, people. YOU DID GOOD.
4.
A Short Bibliographic Toldjaso From This Site
I will preface each of these blurbs with another short blurb, explaining relevance.
This will “refresh your memory”, before we get into the FUTURE.
We start, very appropriately, with RAND PAUL.
Gotta give DOCTOR Rand Paul credit – he has led the fight to bring SANITY back to medicine and science. Thank GOD Trump put him where he saved the most people – in the SENATE. I also have a personal debt here, as a recoveree, forced to wear a needless mask, aggravating my hypoxia. Rand Paul has FREED ME of my TORTURE MASK.
Introduction You have GOT to see the video I’m going to show you. It’s not just what they’re talking about. It’s WHERE IT LEADS. Most of the people who watch Rand Paul go after Fauci here, are concentrating on MASKS, because that is the TOP LAYER of the argument. But THAT is the small potatoes. …
This post is where disparate cracks in the narrative all opened at once. I was no longer going along with the bullshit. Too many questions, too many pat answers turning up WRONG – no – the narrative was full of holes, and it was time to think ON OUR OWN.
PREFACE I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT. The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – …
I just went back and read this thing, and – WOW – just WOW. I was all over two things – spike protein and genetic incorporation – the JAENISCH paper. We are now all over the spike protein, but we MUST turn our attention to genetic incorporation of the vaccine – particularly in people who “fountain” the spike protein. I had forgotten this, but much of the suspicion of Fauci on this site centered around his seeming obsession with vaccines for viruses capable of genomic incorporation.
Yes, Wuhan is important, but I see that as the plotters playing “hot potato scandal” to distract us from the deeper purposes of this LYING phony pandemic.
Genetic incorporation of these vaccines must be investigated. There has been so much we have been told that is WRONG – I think genetic incorporation due to the spike protein acting as a reverse transcription promoter for its own RNA is a biggie.
Alternate Title: Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective? Gloating Pre-Preface There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought. Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY …
No good guys among these genetic vaccines. They are all RISKY for certain people, and when we EUAed them forward, we took those risks. The problem is, with idiot BIDEN in charge, instead of Trump, there was nobody to push the sensible idea of sparing the vaccine from those for whom it would be knowingly risky.
Every coronavirus vaccine so far has shown us SOME defect upon mass release, which was NOT evident in EVEN phase III clinical trials. Look HERE for a searchable PDF document of adverse effects from the Pfizer vaccine: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/977005/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf Check out these videos on the low-platelet clotting problem from the Oxford/Astrazeneca vaccine. Here is a fantastic …
I was really starting to get it here. I was starting to accept that “it’s the full spike protein, stupid!”
I saw an excellent explanation of the clotting problem with the AstraZeneca vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 here: The doctor, Dr. ZDogg, MD, offers an exceptionally clear explanation of both what is going on with the AstraZeneca vaccine, and why its distribution was halted or limited in some places for some age groups of patients. …
This is when I realized that all the gynecological problems being reported for the COVID vaccines were actually a REAL problem, and not just a sub-problem of the clotting problems. I also realized that this effect was too pronounced to be an accident. And then the complications going to other people in close contact – how could this even be possible?
So I considered what sounded like a more reasonable alternative to “vaccine shedding” – namely, spike protein shedding. Indeed, both avenues could be operating, but vaccine shedding now has DATA to support it, in the form of the Pfizer animal data showing persistence and migration. And if you stay with this to the very end, you will see that these lipid nanoparticles have been nothing but trouble from the beginning. It’s an impressive technology, but clearly not fully baked.
Thus, read this post, knowing that the vaccine is likely to be nearly as persistent as the spike protein it produces. Everything I’m saying for the spike protein, should apply in spades for the vaccine, which essentially brings in mRNA as a transmissible FACTORY for creating spike protein. It would not take much vaccine transfer to create the EXACT problem that is observed in alleged shedding incidents.
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …
This is where I really laid out the evidence that the spike protein is causing the problems we’re seeing.
Using Principles of Protein Equivalence and Analogy as Predictive Tools for Coronavirus Understanding Surely you’ve heard of the BROWN RECLUSE SPIDER. The brown recluse is related to several other recluses, and a couple of other families of spiders, that all have a similar venom – a protein called sphingomyelinase D. This is an enzyme that …
If you don’t think those “lipid nanoparticles” of the mRNA vaccines can’t “act like viruses” and basically pass “disease” to a NEW HOST – read this. LNPs ≈ VLPs.
EVERYTHING we are seeing in vaccine medicine now is a COPY of what nature did about 70-100 million years ago, in the insect world. Once I realized this, I was able to pattern this stuff all over what Big Pharma is doing, and get ahead of their game.
This post is probably going to go over a lot of heads, but I think scientists will find it disturbing until they find it compelling, and then ultimately find it satisfying. Creation teaches us – not the other way around.
OK – we’re going to have some fun here – but stick with me, and you could learn A LOT. Cue the music! Borrowed from Wheatie! Previous posts helped put both the SPIKE PROTEIN DISEASE and the SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE into deep perspective. We were seeing that the SOLUTION was a significant part of the …
Deplorable Patriot hit the nail on the head here. Before I accepted the awful fact that these vaccines are not what we thought they were, I didn’t believe shedding could be real. Oh, boy, was I wrong about that.
Our dear boss, Wolf, has been busy putting together scientific primers on just what it is the various shots and inoculations marketed to be preventative of severe symptoms of COVID do, but what hasn’t been addressed for those of us who chose not to be shot up with whatever is in the syringes is how …
This was beautiful – mainstream science and medicine starting to question the Fauci BS. Revel in it. Some of this is now “accepted” – all of it will be, soon enough. We’re headed back to sanity, folks.
This is a very important video you don’t want to miss. It just came out, and the doctor is a guy I’ve been following. He chooses his words carefully, to stay inside the establishment where he can publish some of the top papers, but he speaks the truth at all times. Don’t let the video …
This is where I was blown away by the Pfizer leak out of Japan. The targeting of the ovaries.
AYE-YI-YI. What is one supposed to think? Good GRIEF.
TL;DR – you MUST listen to a short podcast of a scientist revealing the latest research on the spike protein vaccines. The VACCINE ITSELF (not just the spike protein – the mRNA vaccine itself) is persistent and is not only concentrating in ovaries – THE VACCINE ITSELF IS EXCRETED – e.g., in breast milk. Meaning …
Now you can see it very easily – the enemy threw that “Magnet Challenge” out to muddy the water as we were gaining understanding. But here is where I started to look at it experimentally – give it a real examination – and come away fairly doubtful that there is anything to it. The Magnet Challenge is bad science. It may be well-motivated, but it’s quality disinformation. Top-shelf stuff – ACTIVE DISINFORMATION to make people SELF-DISCREDIT – meant to insulate the controlled and groomed experts by discrediting smart people outside of controlled science.
Wherein we examine, in something like “MythBusters” style, the dubious “Magnet Challenge”, without relying (too much) on the anti-scientific crutch of scientific authority First, a confession. The main reason I am attracted to these videos of people sticking magnets to the COVID vaccination injection sites on their shoulders, is that I love to watch normal …
This is where I actually call out the other side for trying to mislead our side with the “Magnet Challenge”. At this point I really understand how utterly misleading this trick is, and WHY it was inflicted on us.
Wherein we look at how the COVID scammers are now using “magnetic” disinformation to try to escape justice for REAL abuse of liposome biotechnology to achieve [most likely contraceptive] vaccine persistence and migration. TL;DR – after mRNA vaccine persistence and anatomical migration were revealed in leaked Pfizer data, explaining “shedding” via persistent liposomes, the COVID …
This is where I investigate the origins of one of the “fake facts” used to trip up the doctors opposed to the spike protein mRNA vaccines. I am convinced that this was some kind of discreditation operation – a precursor to the “Magnet Challenge” psy-op.
This is for the historical record. I hope that this analysis gets to the “dissident scientists” involved, but even if it never does, future historians will get a powerful look at what I call “Fake Science” – the establishment’s phony, deceptive and controlled scientific complex – and how infiltration, control, and discreditation of dissident populist …
At this point, you should be ready for more information – about WHERE vaccination is going.
5.
New Vaccines – The Great Crony Blame Escape
It took me a while to put 2 and 2 together, but when I first saw the June 7 cover article on my new “vaccine snitch”, Chemical & Engineering News, something bothered me about it.
This is more excellent reporting by Ryan Cross, who routinely ferrets out (pun intended) the full story on virus science and vaccine technology, as available to “public science” – to be distinguished from the deeply hidden stuff. Cross never adds in any politics, crime, depolitical deconstruction, “conspiracy theory” speculation, or any of the things that are MY JOB. I have to respect that. This is the way THE NEWS used to be.
get the facts
understand the facts
teach the facts
teach the understanding
light fuse, run away
AH. I love my job. BE THE FUSE.
Figuring out the criminality of the government, industry, and financial backers – getting past the obscurantism, deceptions, and lies – that is OUR JOB – We The People – for we are (now that Merrick Garland soils the DOJ with Chicago communism) the
REAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
Yup. WE are not the communist insurrection and their corporate cronies, destroying everything in their path to money and power, including honest science and doctor-patient medicine.
We are (and like Confucius, I WANT them to hate this) the RESURRECTION.
The RESURRECTION vs. The INSURRECTION.
Eat your own label, insurrectionist commies. It’s good for you!
OK, back to science.
I really encourage you all to read this full article, which is written so that the general public can understand 99% of it easily. You will learn a LOT about vaccine technology. I will move you along through it, skipping over things, but when we’re done, consider reading the whole thing both WITH and FOR greater understanding.
I will try to only quote selectively from it, as I capture a few key points. But I can do no better than to give C&EN’s own “TL;DR” which they label “In brief“:
Vaccines are synonymous with shots, but it doesn’t have to be that way. More than a dozen groups are working on COVID-19 vaccines that can be squirted or sprayed into the nose instead of injected in the arm. Besides the potential practical advantage of easier administration, these vaccines could trigger the mucosal immune system to make antibodies in the nose and help stop the coronavirus at its point of entry. It sounds great, but the mucosal immune system is hard to study, and pharma companies have been reluctant to invest in the needle-free approach. Mucosal immunologists and intranasal vaccine developers are hoping the pandemic will change that.
This is where my first “2+2” $0.02 comes in.
Note the final statement:
Mucosal immunologists and intranasal vaccine developers are hoping the pandemic will change that.
It’s not the phony pandemic that is “going to” change delivery route. It’s already happening, in my opinion, due to the massive unveiling of not just the problems of the systemic gene therapy vaccines, but the clear motivations behind these vaccines, some of which were not just hidden from the public, but also from the scientific community, which I believe is now getting WISE.
Stated more simply, OUR PRESSURE in getting out the TRUTH about the existing vaccines is forcing the industry to react to vaccine shortcomings they WILL NOT ADMIT otherwise. The industry is likely also under forces from ABOVE THEM which are also being exposed.
You will see this as I go through the article.
The most powerful weapons in our hands are the UNDERSTANDINGS of the following:
spike protein toxicity
vaccine persistence
vaccine migration
spike genetic incorporation
Fauci’s reverse transcription obsession
Bill Gates’ “pre-programming the experts”
Zuckerberg connection to Baric lab
irrational hatred of cheap available therapeutics
generality of therapeutics being fought, thus…
the enabling of ChiCom manipulations
ovarian and testicular targeting
hiding of evolutionary knowledge
“circuits of plausibility” to create errors and crises
Put these things together and the “easy path” of systemic vaccines which do NOT mimic stimulation of natural immunity as well as NASAL VACCINES do, has been chosen under the cover of simplicity, but in reality because it always lies closer to what the industry TRULY wants, e.g., right now, gene therapies, where they NEED to target many specific organs. Nasal vaccination is a niche safety point which has always WAITED while systemic gets the action the deep backers want and NEED.
When it’s just easier and possible to do the wrong thing they want, they DO IT.
The current gene therapy desideratum – organ specificity – is actually in another article in the same issue of C&EN, talking about CRISPR, anti-CRISPR, and how to make gene therapy not have side effects, a point which is admitted more openly now that they are “safe on first” by having “proven” that gene therapy “works”.
Such a scam.
But it gets worse. Industry motives are not the motives of those who manipulate THEM.
As you read the rest of this, note that the “running dog” industry layer, which now performs for taskmaster commies, is also manipulated by THEIR true masters, the global elite, now looking at pesticides for humans, and particularly deplorables. It’s clear to me now, after the ovarian, placental, and testicular actions of the spike protein broke media containment, that the reason the entire vaccine industry jumped into full spike protein gene therapy tests masquerading as necessary vaccines is manipulation by the one guy who double-controls vaccine technology via “owning” CEPI – and that would be BILL GATES.
Yes, that Bill Gates, whose father is standing behind Fauci here.
Thus, when both the Gates Foundation and CEPI back some project, it’s Bill Gates getting TWO SCOOPS of control.
Note also Event 201 backing.
With Fauci and the Faucists inside government, and Bill Gates on the outside, there was no way that safer, metered, recombinant spike protein tech or peptide subunit tech was ever going to go first. They needed the new tech given a carte blanche, and they got it. This plus the “crisis” allowed the full spike protein’s foot to be shoved in America’s door, past everybody who might have questioned it.
This is one of the guys who spotted the “snake protein analogy” first, in what would have been time to alter the landscape.
No longer random, this is what happens when people get in the way of a conspiracy TWO LEVELS UP, where the really big boys and girls play. There are money motivations in between, but this guy’s real crime was potentially interfering with “the spike must flow”.
Have I raised your suspicions?
GOOD! Let’s look more deeply at the article now.
In fact, the mucosal membranes that line our airways, digestive systems, and reproductive tracts are often the first parts of our bodies to face an invading pathogen. A network of immune cells resides underneath our mucous membranes, or mucosae, and forms a front line of defense against invaders, and they prevent most infections from taking root. This is the mucosal immune system, and some immunologists think we have been seriously underestimating it.
“When you think about it, that’s where we acquire most of our infections: we inhale them, we consume them, or we get them through sex,” says Michael W. Russell, a mucosal immunologist and professor emeritus at the University at Buffalo.
This is where we begin to realize that mucosal immunity and systemic immunity are NOT the same thing. And it doesn’t have to be “either/or” – you can have BOTH. There are many plausible reasons for one over the other, but it will become clear that using the mucosal pathway adheres more strongly to the natural “API” of immunity by “contact”, if you will, with the pathogen, rather than sudden systemic introduction.
Have we really been underestimating it? Or have we been IGNORING IT ON PURPOSE at the highest motivational levels of power?
In my opinion, if the powers that be in VAXX WORLD would have been looking out for us all this time, there would have been stronger forces pushing researchers toward mucosal immunity. The problem is, that kind of naturalistic and patient-centered thinking is a problem for those who see vaccination as more of a path to power or other ends, particularly SOCIAL ends, rather than as part of a path to individual health. Nothing has made this more clear than the “pandemic”, controlled by “experts” who seemed not to know what they were doing.
Are you now starting to understand how and why conspiracies are intentionally mischaracterized as giant joint illicit cooperation, when they are in fact TOWERS OF LAYERS OF INTERNAL DECEPTIONS?
Good. Let’s move on.
Our mucosal immune cells make a special class of antibodies that are constantly secreted from the mucous membranes to protect the nose, gut, and other vulnerable sites from pathogens we’ve seen in the past. “But if you don’t stimulate the immune system in the mucosae, you don’t obtain mucosal immune responses,” says Pierre Charneau, head of the Molecular Virology and Vaccinology Unit at the Pasteur Institute.
Yet most research on SARS-CoV-2 and our immune systems has overlooked mucosal immunity in favor of the easier-to-study systemic immunity. “When the pandemic hit last year and I started to see papers coming out about immunity, it really quite staggered me to see an absence of attention to the mucosal immune response,” Russell says.
See that? The TILT of the field – the RUSH to systemic – that is a SOCIAL phenomenon – and socialists, or believers in the effectiveness of socialist tactics, like me – will tell you very honestly that science can be controlled SOCIALLY – that the SOCIAL aspects of science are not all warm campfires around each other’s blogs, but actually PART OF THE FIGHT that controls WHAT SCIENCE THINKS and WHAT SCIENCE DOES.
Or like this blog. I’m just honest about it.
I keep telling people that the “jabs” were PUSHED and SHAPED to be what they were – for REASONS – diverse yet all valid – which compromised all the insiders to DO WHAT WAS NEEDED to create what was needed at the TOP:
SYSTEMICALLY MOBILE, GONAD-TARGETING, SPIKE PROTEIN OVERDOSE INJECTIONS AT CONTRACEPTIVE LEVELS.
Stated more generally, it wasn’t a BUG – it was a FEATURE. And we were RUSHED into testing (if not USING) the feature ON PURPOSE.
Now – remember how COVER works – these vaccines did what they were SUPPOSED to do in our little world – but they also did what other people wanted in THEIR little and very exclusive world of “human benefactors”.
We move on.
Charneau and a group of scientists in Paris have shown that natural SARS-CoV-2 infections trigger both systemic and mucosal immunity. But our current crop of COVID-19 vaccines offer only systemic protection. Developing vaccines that are sprayed up the nose, rather than injected into the arm, could change that, Charneau says. Mucosal immunity in our noses could be like a guard at the door, potentially helping stop even small infections of SARS-CoV-2 right where they start.
It’s a tantalizing notion, but whether it’s a viable one is up for debate.
Now, the FIRST thing I think when I read this is “hey, that means my disease immunity is almost certainly BETTER than vaccine immunity – as doctors have all known for decades prior to COVID-19”.
Of course, we know they lied about that to “prevent vaccine hesitancy”. Or stated using different words, “to prevent picking the mild disease over the vaccine in the safer age groups, the latter being most of them”.
Do you see that? Almost ANY lie can be justified in the name of “overcoming vaccine hesitancy”. Who, besides Fauci and CDC is so obsessed with that Swiss army knife excuse and viral talking point?
But you know what – Fauci knew this – and Rand Paul knew Fauci knew this. So when Rand Paul went after Fauci on reinfection of COVID recoverees, like both HIM and ME, he knew Fauci was on THIN ICE.
But toss that all aside. At BEST, we went straight after systemic immunity “because emergency”. But it turned out that it wasn’t all that big of an emergency, and that’s where it gets interesting.
As I said, things are changing very rapidly now – obviously getting a technology on the cover of Chemical & Engineering News is a big deal.
And I quote:
After all, the pandemic provided a chance for messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine technology to finally prove its worth, and mucosal immunologists are hoping that this will be a moment for intranasal vaccines to do the same. “This climate is a game changer,” says Hiroshi Kiyono, codirector of the University of California San Diego Center for Mucosal Immunology, Allergy, and Vaccines. “This is a great opportunity to advance nasal vaccines, not just for COVID-19 but for other respiratory diseases.”
YUP. That’s the way CRISIS MECHANICS works. The “crisis” is just going to CHANGE, to get people to do a NEXT NEW WRONG THING.
My advice to Hiroshi Kiyono would be WATCH OUT – you are going to be subjected to many pressures that bring mucosal vaccines TOWARD viability as spike protein contraceptives. There will be pressure AWAY FROM doing what is best for the PATIENT, and TOWARD doing what is best for the SCIENCE and the RESEARCH, and that “better” will just happen to be better for surreptitious social or even sociobiological manipulations, too.
This is just a HEADS UP.
I’ve been there. Fake Science is not a very nice place to be when billions or trillions of dollars are on the line, and YOU’RE IN THE WAY.
At this point, the article goes into the HISTORY of intranasal vaccines, intranasal being one of the very best routes for respiratory virus vaccines. I’m going to SKIP over all that, even though there are some very interesting aspects to that history. I don’t really see any smoking guns of obstruction or sabotage, but it’s pretty clear that intranasal was a bit of a black sheep, and fended for itself.
Now, HERE is what’s interesting. Which intranasal vaccines are “in the pipeline”?
TURN YOUR NOSE UP
More than a dozen intranasal vaccines are in development for COVID-19. Here are several to keep an eye on.
Phase 1
Altimmune ▸ Adenoviral vector
AstraZeneca and University of Oxford ▸ Adenoviral vector
Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy, University of Hong Kong, and Xiamen University ▸ Live attenuated influenza virus vector
Bharat Biotech and Washington University in St. Louis ▸ Adenoviral vector
Codagenix and Serum Institute of India ▸ Live attenuated SARS-CoV-2
Laboratorio Avi-Mex and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai ▸ Live Newcastle disease virus vector
Meissa Vaccines ▸ Live attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vector
Preclinical
AuraVax and University of Houston ▸ Recombinant spike protein with adjuvant
HanaVax and University of Tokyo ▸ Recombinant spike protein with adjuvant
TheraVectys and Pasteur Institute ▸ Lentiviral vector
University of Eastern Finland and University of Helsinki ▸ Adenoviral vector
Sources: Companies, World Health Organization.
Now, that may not look like much, but there is a TON to unpack, because we not only have OLD “new” technologies in a NEW route – we have NEW “new” technologies to explain – and in a new route.
If you don’t think the other side can cause trouble with their spike protein attack through the nose, you are sorely underestimating the ability of those who CONTROL SCIENCE to “get there first” and mislead the rest of the pack.
Remember – if you think like me, then you know people have been doing this crap for billions of years in THIS universe alone. We’re just “rediscovering reality under supervision” on one more planet. The lies are OLD. Very, very OLD. And as I like to say, “Satan weaponizes everything.”
The adenoviral vectors we’ve seen. That’s AstraZeneca, Johnson+Johnson, Sputnik V, and others. The only difference is that they’re going through the nose, where these viruses are actually supposed to go.
There is a LOT of possibility that this move could solve the biggest problems with these vaccines. IF the nasal delivery route is a kind of highly evolved and intelligent natural “attenuation gauntlet” for viruses, then the outcomes for these vaccines could be uniformly improved.
IF that is indeed the case, then I’m going to be a “toldjaso” asshole and use this as part of my explanation of why “they” have divided us in the specific way they have, over the topic of evolution, separating the “intelligence” side from the “evolutionary science” side, thus pushing the latter to view evolution as DUMB instead of “cautiously and obsessively path-checking”, which looks dumb to localized intelligence that doesn’t know how to keep its biases in its own lane.
These vaccines also introduce lentiviral vectors – pretty much the same thing as the adenoviral vectors, just a different virus. Again, this is new, so it could be interesting.
Another returning technology is Recombinant spike protein with adjuvant. That is basically Novavax, which we have not really had a chance to deconstruct, because there is not yet much public information on safety or efficacy. So a big QUESTION MARK on that one. In principle this should be safer than genetic technologies, both because there are ZERO risks of genomic incorporation (see Jaenisch for SARS-CoV-2 incorporation), and because there are no possibilities of unmetered “fountaining” of spike protein.
First up in technologies we have NOT seen yet: Live attenuated SARS-CoV-2.
We have already used INACTIVATED SARS-CoV-2 – that would include the Chinese Sinovac vaccine, which is rebranded as CoronaVac in the West. I’ve been cautioning that I believe “bad lots” of CoronaVac, which are incompletely inactivated, have been passed off, which would explain why there is typically a surge in cases right when countries start using CoronaVac. Obviously that’s good for business, and we know how Chinese business works. The only other explanation would be that PCR is picking up vaccine during rollout, and I’m half-way thinking that’s a better explanation, were I not so familiar with ChiComs and the corruption they spread.
However, we have NOT yet seen live attenuated virus. This could be GREAT – or it could have a whole NEW bag of problems. I’m very “wait and see” on this.
The real BIGGIES of the new intranasal vaccines are these:
Live attenuated influenza virus vector
Live Newcastle disease virus vector
Live attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vector
Unlike the adenoviral vector vaccines, which are basically “working but dead mRNA in a dead skin suit of a different virus that’s easy to work with”, these vectors are LIVE VIRUSES with “something extra” (like the spike protein) inserted into their genes, making them chimeric at the genetic level, not just the vector level.
These vaccine viruses are actually designed to “run a bit”. They INFECT YOU with instructions to crank out spike protein.
This is where things start getting weird, and it’s hard to trust a world which contains both THIS technology AND the CCP.
You know what I’m sayin’?
But now let’s look at all these. We suddenly have a LOT of vaccines to keep track of.
It’s gonna take some work – but we have to do it. We cannot let them keep experimenting on us like they did, while CHINA did almost NO “experimentation” on its people.
Understand what I’m sayin’?
Good.
Now – the rest of the article is basically the HOPES and the NOPES of the intranasal route. Some of the possibilities here are MIND-BOGGLINGLY GOOD.
Mucosal immune cells constantly make an antibody called secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA), which gets released into the mucous membranes of the nose, mouth, airways, and gut. Pound for pound, we produce more IgA than any other antibody, Russell says, although most of it is broken down and sneezed, coughed, or pooped out within a few days.
And critically, while injected vaccines induce only systemic immunity, vaccines delivered to mucosal sites can induce both systemic and mucosal immunity, he says.
That fact is evident in animal studies of a vaccine being developed by David T. Curiel and Michael Diamond at Washington University in St. Louis. Both the injected and intranasal forms of their vaccine triggered the production of IgG antibodies, but only the intranasal route triggered mucosal immune cells to secrete IgA that blocked the virus from replicating in the nose. A day after they published preprint data demonstrating as much in July 2020, the Indian vaccine company Bharat Biotech contacted the university’s technology-transfer office to license the intranasal vaccine in India, where it is being tested in a clinical trial. “How that will play out clinically remains to be seen,” Curiel says. “But this animal model finding suggests, qualitatively, that we have some additional benefit.”
It is very clear that – for a respiratory disease – there is an advantage to having “naturally obtained” respiratory mucosal immunity.
All that said, we’re still talking spike protein. But if the intranasal route can keep it out of the ovaries, testicles, and placenta – GREAT.
And THAT brings me to another great C&EN report by Ryan Cross – everything you want to know and need to know about those damned lipid nanoparticles.
Without these lipid shells, there would be no mRNA vaccines for COVID-19
Fragile mRNA molecules used in COVID-19 vaccines can’t get into cells on their own. They owe their success to lipid nanoparticles that took decades to refine
Without doing any “gotcha” journalism, Cross reveals the GOOD, the BAD, and the UGLY about these lipid nanoparticles.
The impression I get is that this field was dogged with problems, most of which were overcome, but not all.
So, without getting into the details, all these criticisms of the lipid nanotech that you are hearing are NOT “conspiracy theories” – the scientists are TALKING ABOUT THEM as real problems they’re trying to solve, with various degrees of success, in this report.
To me, it was very clear that people WAY above these scientists needed to PUSH this LNP (lipid nanoparticle) technology, necessary for GENE THERAPY, into acceptance using the phony plague.
If you don’t want to take this stuff, STAND UP for your rights. Otherwise, it’s over the hill, the horses are OUT OF THE BARN, the fence is open and the cattle are GONE.
BUT – I think that if we keep pushing the REALITIES of these vaccines, we can make the “mandate martinets” crawl back into their Fuehrer Bunkers and leave us alone.
And THAT is worth it.
W
PSSSST – hey, DOJ and FBI. Want to see some audit results?
THEY’RE EXPLOSIVE!
Seriously, you injustice-perpetuating assholes deserve to be trolled. Your phony allegations of “violence” or even potential violence by the QAnon “believers” are an affront to Americans. They’re a SICKNESS coated with a patina of professionalism. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
Plain Jane, who would come to the Q Tree and comment when she could, is now with the Great Physician. She fought cancer with unbelievable courage and didn’t flinch at trying different therapies. RIP.
Here is the brief message from IOTWreport, a site that Plain Jane held very dear. She turned me into an admirer of “Big Fur Hat” and the other denizens of that site. I thoroughly enjoyed the history of their little collective, which reminded me greatly of ours, only they pulled it off 10 years earlier, when it was much more difficult, both technologically and politically.
Big Fur Hat kept it short and sweet and to the point.
PJ, the sweetest, has passed, succumbing to cancer.
Knowing how Plain Jane adored that site, I am tickled knowing that BFH could do her no higher honor than giving Jane her own short, sweet, dignified post of au revoir.
Maybe someday I’ll search deeply to find the night (or was it early morning?) where Jane and I talked about IOTWreport and BFH. It was fun. It was a good memory. But I think I’ll save that for later, when I need it.
Instead, what I did now, was to go back and find her very first post. That was enough for now.
I knew that Jane was one of the very first posters on this site. What I did not remember was that she was one of the VERY, VERY, VERY first posters.
She commented on THE first post of the site. The very FIRST comment was by Curry Worsham, at 11:34 PM on September 18, 2018. Plain Jane commented at 1:51 AM (on the 19th), a little over 2 hours later.
Here was our conversation. Her first comment was (I calculated – the numbers are a bit offset due to site migration) the 28th comment on the blog.
Plain Jane Offline September 19, 2018 01:51
Congrats and thanks for founding this site, Wolf. While I can’t say that I understand Q, I totally enjoy reading others’ interpretation of his posts, and sometimes even try to figure them out myself.
Thank you! And really good, because I’m a great explainer of Q, but rarely on CTH – usually in personal discussions on Twitter. This way I can help people understand some of the things that maybe don’t make as much sense. And I do think a lot of fellow Treepers will be able to explain things much more fully here, and without worrying about drawing FLAK from Soros trolls, who I will boot immediately. We won’t allow any of that here.
This is not a site for basic decisions about whether or not to “stop making fun of Q-tards”. This is a site for advanced understanding of Q. Many of the people who mock Q on the Treehouse will be banned instantly.
Treehouse standards. Q is the center of focus. Very simple.
0 Reply
Plain Jane Offline Reply to wolfmoon1776 September 19, 2018 02:04
This is an excellent idea, Wolfmoon. Q people need a place to chat. I no longer do twitter or facebook, so a blog is great for me to interact on. While I like the Treehouse a lot, I find it somewhat disturbing that more people (admittedly trolls for the most part) now hit at each other over their disagreements rather than pass a comment by.
I’ve been following Q for a while now and we tune into Praying Medic regularly for his insights. I very much appreciate that you have made a space for Q followers.
BTW, WordPress has a good history for leaving politics out of it. Anthony Watts of Watts Up With That (WUWT – fighting climate change nonsense) talked some years ago of how hacks and other attacks can’t get through to a WordPress site and also how they can handle large volumes of traffic, which is why he uses them. That stuck in my mind. As far as I know, he’s never been foiled by the enemy.
Cheers to you. I have bookmarked this site and will be a regular. Now to look at and appreciate your other link…
Thank you – great post! Hope to see you here regularly! And totally agreed about WordPress security. If it worked for the climate guys and Sundance, it will work for me. I mean US!!!
Hey Wolfmoon – Just saw your contact page. Haha – Neat! I love it. Okay, any chance of an open page every week or so for open chat? Or just when nothing much else is happening? I don’t want to go off-topic on any thread already up. I sometimes just feel a need for my buddies here and to be able to talk within the realm of general topics or just say “Hi”.
You’re welcome! I tend to be cautiously speculative, which I think is a good thing for filtering truth, but allowing people to explore possibilities. As I tend to think a lot like Praying Medic, there is some chance we’ll end up sounding dittoish, but still I hope that we will overall bring something new to the table, and thus sharpen the vision of MAGA as a whole.
0 Reply
I had many wonderful conversations with PJ over the years. She was – sorry – IS – incredibly grounded. She told me about some of the volunteer work she had done – it was powerful testimony. She has the DRIVE of an activist but the COOL and CALM of a true conservative.
She will be missed in the here and now, but not in the spirit, because she is truly an inspiration, and perhaps one that I need right now.
