“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
Nobody would be calling ALL of the various full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein vaccines “the clot shot” if there weren’t some clear and obvious problems with the full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike proteinITSELF.
We already know that clotting dysfunction is key to COVID-19 pathogenicity. SO – it’s not exactly a surprise that the spike protein itself, and likewise the S1 subunit of that protein – a.k.a. THE BUSINESS END – are themselves pathogenic.
In the above example, the S1 subunit of the spike protein was basically 100% lethal to humanized mice when applied to their lungs.
And when they looked at the mice, the damage was basically the same as the damage from COVID-19.
Just sayin’.
So let me now TEST you, and see if you’re more of a scientist than Fauci’s protege Rochelle Alinsky – WHOOPS – I mean Rochelle Walensky – who heads the CDC for Fauci to maintain control of it.
If you give a SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE to somebody, and they have symptoms of COVID-19 during the next few days, or even during the next two weeks, which scenario is more likely?
(A) – The person just happened to get real COVID-19, and THAT spike protein did BAD THINGS.
(B) – The spike protein you put inside the person did BAD THINGS.
Do you see how science works?
It’s a lot like common sense, only it’s applied to fancy stuff.
I want you to meet some great scientists here. These are people with very little scientific authority, but they simply practiced science, instead of repeating what authorities told them.
(1) – The CNA who would not accept “super-spreader” myths
This guy was one of the first people to administer the Pfizer vaccine to nursing home residents.
He was shocked that his nursing home residents would die shortly after being vaccinated – after having survived for months BEFORE the vaccine – in a way that was clearly related to their being vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine.
Nursing home management would NOT admit to the obvious connection – and created a mythical “super-spreader” to explain the deaths.
This man is a HERO.
The first 10 minutes of the video is this man working up the courage of conscience – to SPEAK THE TRUTH. If you just want to hear what he needed to say, you can jump to 10 minutes and you will hear the SCIENCE.
(2) – From Physician’s Assistant to VAERS Whistleblower
This lady, a hospital physician’s assistant, started out as a “COVID training true believer”, but she began observing what the shots were doing in her hospital. From there, she began encountering resistance to “doing the right thing”.
Now, in retrospect, you can see everybody in the system avoiding responsibility – not just for the problem, but for even reporting it.
A fantastic interview by Del Bigtree’s Highwire show.
This doctor discovered not only that “the jab” was leading to loss of wind (reduced effort tolerance) in too many of his patients – a whopping 62% of all his patients were showing signs of microscopic clotting – similar to COVID-19 – after vaccination.
Thus, you will see that we were READY when a good explanation of the clot shot arose.
II. The Explanation
I want to start by thanking barkerjim for posting a comment with a link that leads to a very recent paper (pre-peer-review, of course) that explains the clot shot. He found the link HERE on Denninger’s Market Ticker site.
“Here we report that the Spike protein from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) binds to the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and induces structurally abnormal blood clots with heightened proinflammatory activity. SARS-CoV-2 Spike virions enhanced fibrin-mediated microglia activation and induced fibrinogen-dependent lung pathology. COVID-19 patients had fibrin autoantibodies that persisted long after acute infection.”
“The central structural component of blood clots, and a key regulator of inflammation in disease, is insoluble fibrin, which is derived from the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and is deposited in tissues at sites of vascular damage (10, 11). Hypercoagulability in COVID-19 is associated with inflammation and the formation of fibrin clots resistant to degradation despite adequate anticoagulation (3-5). Extensive fibrin deposits are detected locally in inflamed lung and brain tissues from COVID-19 patients, sometimes without evidence of direct viral infection at autopsy (1, 8, 12-14). The high prevalence of thrombotic events with these unique hypercoagulability features suggests an as yet unknown mechanism of abnormal blood clot formation in COVID-19. We set out to determine how blood clots form in COVID-19 and to identify therapies to combat the deleterious effects of abnormal coagulation occurring in acute and convalescent stages of disease.”
“Since hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients has features distinct from those of other inflammatory diseases, we hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 directly affects the structural and functional properties of blood clots. Incubation of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant trimeric spike protein (Spike) with healthy donor plasma increased fibrin polymerization (Fig. 1A). Spike strikingly altered the fibrin clot structure resulting in thinner fibers with a rough appearance and increased clot density as shown by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Fig. 1B, fig. S1), identifying direct effects of SARS-CoV-2 Spike on fibrin clot architecture. Consistent with these structural changes, a solid-phase binding assay revealed binding of Spike to both fibrinogen and fibrin (Kd 5.3 μM and 0.4 μM, respectively) (Fig. 1C). Fibrinogen immunoprecipitated with full-length recombinant trimeric Spike, and studies with deletion mutants identified an interaction with the S2 domain of Spike (Fig. 1D, fig. S2).”
“Intravenous administration of Spike PVs in wild-type (WT) mice induced extensive fibrin deposition in the lung (Fig. 2A). (…) Fibrin deposition was associated with activated endothelium in the lung, and gene expression analysis revealed increased expression of endothelial and inflammatory markers in Spike PV-injected mice (…) consistent with findings of SARS-CoV-2 toxicity to endothelial cells (19). (…) Mice genetically-deficient in fibrinogen (Fgα–/– mice), which express all other blood proteins except fibrinogen and are protected from autoimmune and inflammatory conditions (11), did not exhibit lung pathology following Spike PV challenge (Fig. 2E, fig. S5).”
“Fibrinogen is causally linked to the activation of macrophages and microglia in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in the brain and periphery (11, 21). Fibrin is a driver of microglia-induced cognitive dysfunction (22) and is associated with perivascular-activated microglia and macrophages in brains of COVID-19 patients even without signs of infection (12).”
“A surge of autoantibody production against diverse immune targets have been detected in COVID-19 patients (25). To determine whether COVID-19 patients develop autoantibodies against abnormal blood clots, we tested autoantibody responses to fibrin. (…) We tested longitudinally collected serum samples ranging from acute to convalescent disease stages from 54 COVID-19 asymptomatic, mild, and severe disease patients requiring admission to the intensive care units (table S3). Fibrin autoantibodies were abundant in all three groups of COVID-19 patients and persisted during the convalescent stage, but were scarce in healthy donor controls or in subjects with non-COVID respiratory illnesses (Fig. 4A, B).”
“In summary, we find that SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein enhances the formation of highly inflammatory clots that are neutralized by a fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody. Our data shed new light on the enigmatic coagulopathy found in COVID-19 revealing a causal role for fibrinogen in thromboinflammation – even independent of active viral replication. The high incidence of clotting complications in COVID-19 has been attributed to systemic inflammation (3), vascular damage including abnormal levels of circulating coagulation proteins (1, 26), genetic susceptibility to tissue factor and complement genes (27), and prothrombotic autoantibodies (28). Our findings now show that coagulopathy is not merely a consequence of inflammation. Rather, the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 Spike with fibrinogen and fibrin results in abnormal blood clot formation that in turn drives inflammation.”
[ THIS HERE IS THE PART TO READ ]
Assuming the results are correct – and I can see little reason to doubt them though replication is always important – this really starts to put the puzzle pieces together. I’m frankly amazed that it took so long to figure this out.
In less-scientific language:
1. The spike protein binds directly to fibrinogen, the protein precursor of fibrin which forms blood clots.
2. This binding causes the fibrinogen to polymerize to form fibrin strands, thus forming clots.
3. Spike binding to fibrin in clots also changes the clot structure and renders it resistant to degradation.
4. Fibrin induces immune inflammation. This is usually adaptive because clotting occurs at sites of injury. It is dangerous when it occurs in response to diffuse and extensive spike-mediated micro-clotting. This helps to explain the runaway immune-mediated inflammatory response characteristic of severe Covid-19.
5. Spike *alone* (in the absence of an infectious virus) induces fibrin deposition and inflammation in the lungs of mice. However, mice lacking the gene for fibrinogen exhibited no pathology upon spike exposure, demonstrating that the fibrinogen-spike interaction is necessary and sufficient for spike-induced pathology.
6. Fibrin induces cognitive dysfunction via immune inflammation in the brain.
7. Many recovered Covid-19 patients have abundant autoantibodies against fibrin – independent of disease severity – while these autoantibodies are rare in unexposed people. This indicates both that spike-mediated fibrin formation is occurring in the course of actual human infection, and that autoreactive antibodies are formed which may play a role in chronic/long-haul symptoms or prolonged clotting problems.
8. A fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody greatly reduced inflammation, suggesting a potential new route for disease treatment.
The paper never uses the word “vaccine” – a glaring and clearly intentional omission – but it should be obvious based on these findings that instructing the body to produce large amounts of spike protein on multiple occasions is a dangerous prospect, and it also explains those autopsy revelations of bodies full of clots.
One caveat: The coordinating author is working with a start-up company to develop treatments based on reducing fibrin-mediated inflammation, so there is clearly some commercial interest here that could be influencing objectivity. On the other hand, it is often the entrepreneurial think-outside-the-box types who end up making groundbreaking discoveries.
Mark L
[ BOOM!!! ]
This is AMAZING and powerful work.
Remember that scientific paper that we started this article with?
NOW we know exactly how that happens. See how the SCIENCE is all connecting together?
The commenter on Ecosophia makes TWO critical points.
POINT ONE is that vaccines are never mentioned. That is how this work will eventually be published. The Rochelle Alinsky CDC could STOP the paper as potentially causing “vaccine hesitancy” if the authors mentioned vaccines, but by throwing no stones, none bounce back.
The CDC will still likely DELAY this from being published for as long as they can. But by avoiding mention of vaccines, the paper cannot be scuttled on the grounds that it “might cause vaccine hesitancy”, which is the FALSE IMPERATIVE that the CDC socialists use to control science and force vaccines on us as a social sabotage. Instead, the READER can make the connections and understand the implications for vaccines.
Do you see why PREPUBLICATION COMMUNICATIONS (like this one) are now so important?
POINT TWO is that it’s JUST THE SPIKE PROTEIN – NOT THE VIRUS AS A WHOLE – that causes the problems. And it’s been PROVEN. And it’s been PROVEN that THIS is the mechanism of the problems induced by the spike protein.
The moniker of “CLOT SHOT” is literally proven to be correct.
This is a BOMBSHELL because it indicts the entire concept of full-length spike protein vaccines as fundamentally flawed. It indicts mRNA vaccines as even more flawed than antigen, because the amount of toxic spike protein is unregulated. (Notice that I’ve been saying this all along.) It doesn’t necessarily say that other types of vaccines (like RBD subunit antigen vaccines) are any safer than spike protein antigen vaccines, but they MIGHT BE.
Something even BETTER here, than just the fibrinogen mechanism, is the way that this EXPLAINS (point 4 above) what one nurse practitioner observed – that COVID strikes PRE-EXISTING INFLAMMATION. Both the WHY of some people having severe COVID and others not, and the LOCATION of those issues, is explained by fibrin’s ties to pre-existing inflammation. We now have a mechanism which we already know follows that rule, because that’s how fibrin works.
This also explains why antihistamines work to save people from severe COVID. Antihistamines are generally useful against severe inflammation by pathogenic substances which cause inflammatory reactions. It’s why they administer benadryl as a general emergency antiinflammatory for purposes like anaphylaxis prevention.
Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …
And yet the CDC has WARNED people against taking antihistamines with the vaccine – when this work LITERALLY PROVES WHY THAT IS A GOOD STRATEGY – just as it is a good strategy to take antihistamines to protect against severe COVID.
Like I said, this study proves THAT we were right, and WHY we were right.
And why is CDC so WRONG – time and time again?
This is a breaker of logjams. The insistence on the use of a fundamentally flawed vaccine is CRIMINAL.
Mandates are bad enough, but over a vaccine, the very principle of which is scientifically proven as DANGEROUS?
If mandates continue, these people need to be in JAIL. If they RESIST, they need to be OVERTHROWN.
Mandating this fundamentally dangerous vaccine is so wrong on so many levels.
This is a EUGENIC VACCINE if there ever was one. It’s almost DESIGNED to finish off people who are not 100% healthy.
How can this be right? Seriously. How can this be right?
We can no longer tolerate these people who pretend not to know.
III. The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand
I start this section by thanking three people – Sundance, Aubergine, and Trumpismine – who helped me to see what is going on here.
SUNDANCE informed me of the “Mamet Principle” – that liberals pretend not to know things
AUBERGINE formulated her wonderful Razor – that it is dangerous to dismiss such pretense as mere stupidity, when it might be the product of malice or guile.
TRUMPISMINE turned me on to the Wikipedia definition of Lysenkoism, which contained enough detail that I was able to connect the goals of old Lysenkoism to the actions of the left today.
The so-called Mamet Principle is a paraphrase of a repeated point by David Mamet, which Sundance encapsulated as a principle. This has been discussed and exemplified many times, both here and on CTH.
In asking WHY liberals “pretend not to know things”, we now understand that Hanlon’s Razor is an EXCUSE – that it’s COVER – and that it’s NOT because they’re STUPID, but rather because they’re smart and evil.
The best and most concise description is a reworking of Hanlon’s Razor by our own Aubergine.
So what if we apply this to Saint Fauci of Antibodies?
Anthony Fauci has a literal MAGICIAN’S POWER to make people focus on the WRONG THING. His skills of EVASION are absolutely outstanding. I love to call it “antibody hypnosis”, because that is exactly what it seems like.
“YOU WILL LOOK AT THE ANTIBODIES. THE ANTIBODIES WILL SAVE YOU. LOOK ONLY AT THE ANTIBODIES. YOU ARE FEELING WARM. YOU ARE FEELING SAFE. YOU ARE HAPPY ABOUT THE ANTIBODIES. THE MORE ANTIBODIES YOU SEE, THE WARMER YOU FEEL – LIKE THE SUN ON YOUR FACE ON A BEACH.”
You even hear his voice when you read that – don’t you? That gravelly, reassuring voice.
It’s VERY intentional.
Focusing on ONE WRONG THING – or even ONE RIGHT THING – is a technique of misdirection, but it is one of the BEST ways of pretending not to know things.
“Let’s only talk about this.”
Rand Paul knows all about it. He has gone many rounds with the Fauci critter.
But it’s not just Fauci.
His protege in CDC, who gives Fauci effective control of medical science, is every bit as bad.
It even includes Rand Paul’s colleagues in Congress.
The man behind the launch of censorship. Is this guy even AMERICAN?
What a PUTZ.
ANYWAY, this is where I started to figure things out.
This WEIRD LOVE of the radical left for brutal, aggressive, stupid, uncaring science – where does it come from?
I did not expect the answer that I found, with the help of Trumpismine and Wikipedia.
It’s very helpful to read this, including this part:
Marxism–Leninism postulated “universal and immutable laws of history” (historical materialism and dialectical materialism), which assumed unavoidable large-scale change at the collective level of societies.[5]Collectivism was a key feature of Marxism; Darwin’s concept of a random mutation in an individual being able to propagate and transform subsequent generations was at odds with the ideology, and was perceived as having a strong liberal inclination.[6] Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]
Most people brought up in mainstream, establishment, Western science use the term Lysenkoism without really understanding the political angle of it. We understand it merely as “politics being imposed on scientists in the Soviet Union, which set back Soviet biological science by decades.”
Yes, that’s true, but it’s not ALL of the truth. The more you know about it, the more it looks EXACTLY like “Woke Science”.
As an aside, clearly it makes sense WHY China (and to a lesser extent Russia) would want to promote Lysenkoism in the United States, as part of their own interests. “China First” and “Russia First” by socialist and ex-socialist means are unlikely to be pretty. “Fuck the other guy up so he can’t win” is a valid technique in a corrupt world.
But it goes deeper.
Lysenkoism is far less about being STUPID, than about being REVOLUTIONARY. That is a critical idea. That quality of being revolutionary makes mistakes, and when it does, it’s generally STUPID. But when it does NOT make mistakes, it’s generally EVIL.
Let me repeat what I said, earlier about Lysenkoism.
You know what? This is actually really interesting reading.
In a WEIRD WAY – Lysenko was “right”, in that he maniacally predicted EXACTLY what the communists are doing NOW with gene therapy. His assertion of a “genetic dialectic” – of the “evolutionary” in conflict with the “revolutionary” – is actually what we’re seeing RIGHT NOW with the “natural evolution” crowd (US) versus the commie-forced gene therapy crowd (THEM).
Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]
It was just total hubris and pathological commie science – a lot like what we see from Fauci, Gates and Walensky – but it “anticipated” what WOULD come eventually through science – that someday WE would have the power to do the things – and make the mistakes – that we are making now.
So in many ways these people ARE the intellectual inheritors of Lysenkoism!!!
Lysenko’s mistake was claiming that things WERE what they merely COULD BE through greater understanding.
Imagine some person coming BEFORE Galileo and trying to FORCE heliocentrism in their country – killing, jailing, ousting, and attacking the geocentrists.
In a sense, that was Lysenko, who attacked natural evolution.
Natural processes are “evolution”.
Genetic modification is “revolution”.
The dude was a NUT, trying to assert that the NATURAL was both, when it’s almost all ONE. But if he would have simply said “We must become revolutionary in genetics, which is merely evolutionary now”, then he would have been like the Lenin of biology, and he would likely be admired today by all these crazy leftists and depoppers, instead of an old Soviet embarrassment.
But ALL OF THAT comes back and tells me that these people are the modern recapitulation of Lysenkoist THOUGHT, but using the GAINS of actual evolutionary understanding.
The nutbaggery we see NOW with the communist jab-maniacs, is just like Lysenko’s assertions, only MORE REAL because they have MORE TECH.
[END QUOTE]
Soviet science, and Lysenko in particular, were characterized by a kind of VIRTUE SIGNALING, and that is what we are seeing now on universities, only it tends to be about peripheral things, like race, diversity, gender – whatever is in leftist vogue.
But NOW, in our phony socialist “pandemic”, we are seeing the virtue signals rise to levels that affect the practice of science itself. It’s starting at GOALS, but very soon, it will get a bit like CLIMATE LYSENKOISM, where people CHANGE DATA, HIDE DATA, DROP EVIDENCE, and basically act like MAINSTREAM MEDIA JOURNALISTS, who are in a continuous state of covering things up by omission, distraction, and promotion of contradicting narratives.
That is NOT GOOD.
I think that we are now seeing with publications like the one featured in this article, is some PUSH-BACK by scientists who realize where things are headed – a VERY BAD place. They are GETTING THE TRUTH OUT.
We need to help promote awareness of science that CDC and the communist infiltration are going to hide.
W
On August 7, 1948, at the end of a week-long session organised by Lysenko and approved by Stalin,[14] the V.I. Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences announced that from that point on Lysenkoism would be taught as “the only correct theory.” Soviet scientists were forced to denounce any work that contradicted Lysenko.[19] Criticism of Lysenko was denounced as “bourgeois” or “fascist,” and analogous “non-bourgeois” theories also flourished in other fields such as linguistics and art in the Soviet academy at this time. Perhaps the only opponents of Lysenkoism during Stalin’s lifetime to escape liquidation were from the small community of Soviet nuclear physicists: as Tony Judt has observed, “It is significant that Stalin left his nuclear physicists alone and never presumed to second guess their calculations. Stalin may well have been mad but he was not stupid.”[20]
My dear wife is the one who found this, so let me start off by thanking her.
After working outside Tuesday night, I came in the front door, and my wife IMMEDIATELY told me to start watching what was on OAN. It was an anonymous Rumble video about ivermectin and remdesivir that OAN re-bannered and broadcast, after being unable to identify or contact the author.
I’m very glad OAN decided to promote this video.
I caught only part of the ivermectin story, but ALL of the remdesivir story, and THAT was enough to get me searching for an online copy of the video for all of the readers here.
You can watch the OAN-rebannered video at the following link. (The original video is below.)
‘The Story Of Ivermectin’ Sheds Light On The History & Benefits Of The Drug
OAN Newsroom UPDATED 12:30 PM PT – Wednesday, October 13, 2021
Despite doctor testimonials, clinical trials and international studies showing the efficacy of Ivermectin, mainstream media continues to suppress information regarding the drug as a treatment for COVID-19.
One America News would like to shed light on the history and the benefits of Ivermectin by showing a video recently posted to Rumble by a user called ‘Temporarily Grounded.’
While we could not make contact with the user, we urge our viewers to email via our contact page at oann.com if you have any information on the video’s creator, including his name and direct contact information.
Fortunately, the original video is still on Rumble.
This video basically shows the solid background of ivermectin, including some truly excellent and unbiased scientific information. However, about halfway through, it switches gears, and talks about the suppression of ivermectin.
The latter quickly segues into the promotion of remdesivir – and THAT is where it’s really, really powerful.
Who, you might ask, is behind remdesivir?
It’s SHOCKING – it’s not who you would expect – and you NEED to watch.
Beyond that, the documentary explains exactly how the bias for remdesivir was built into the trials – and that, too, is shocking.
I have been trying to warn people just how FAKE science is right now. This documentary backs me up BIG TIME. Thus, very glad to share it now.
We present here a TRANSCRIPT of a very long video from THE PROFESSOR’S RECORD, in which Prof. David Clements interviews Col. John Mills.
THANK YOU to GAIL COMBS for transcribing this terribly long but absolutely amazing interview.
Col. Mills reveals STARTLING information about so much – right out of the gate, he exposes the 2016 coup against Trump, and then goes right into the looming WORLD WAR WITH CHINA.
Then he goes back and fills in the details.
It’s well worth listening to, but if you want to find any of the AMAZING details later, this transcript will help. You can SEARCH this post and find where things are discussed.
Here you go – 21 pages of interview broken up into SEVEN PIECES.
I have made a few very minor spelling corrections on critical things like names. Otherwise – RAW.
1.
ROUGH TRANSCRIPT
It IS A COUP Comey & Brennan KNEW Russia was FAKE in summer 2016 but pushed the dis-info anyway. Col Mills was called on secure phone a couple days after the election to help “We need you to be part of and help craft and finish the narrative that Trump is a Russian Spy we need an intell community assessment.
Col Phil Waldron introduced to Prof.
Mills had a 35+ year security carreer.
1st Gulf war….
We are in the final stages in a world wide collision with China… we have to stare down China from going full kinetic because they are under incredible duress at home. As bad as it is here, there are incredibly bad things going on in China that force dictators to lash out.
12 minutes Different Commanders in Chief
Carter Carter hapless fecklessness powerless Sound familiar? Rapid colapse of Iran closest model of what we saw in Kabul. Carter was the original Obama & Biden. It was our fault. WE were the problem Like the british socialists in the UK who unseated Churchill, Carter was all about GRACEFUL DECLINE & Dis-establishment of the USA. Managed Decline.
Reagan Return of America. A Can Do positive attitute. As messed up as we are we are the best thing out there.
Bush Senior Status quo Republicans. We are LIKE DEMOCRATS EXCEPT BETTER. Not a good sales point. Panama, Gulf war. Not interested in economy
Clinton Un Peace keeping involvement, increased role of government Nat security advisor IDed al-Qaeda as major problem but Cliton did nothing which lead to 9/11. Didn’t realize til sent to Joint staff at pentagon exposed to an incredible amount of military planning that went on in 97 & 98 & 99 after the bombings Khobar towers, American embassies, major planning to go after Bin Laden. Everyone of the plans briefed to the White House and TURNED DOWN.
Bush Senior Bush was status Quo establishment. Afghanistan done well until pivoted vocus to Iraq I think there was a close connection to Iraq.
18:30 – Dave Asks what is the difference between ‘Managed Decline’ and non-interventionist foreign policy. [ Washington avoid foreign entanglements] & Reagan peace thru strength. Both concerned with the JUST WAR DOCTRINE. Constitution ‘Declare’ War not MAKE war which seems to mean we have to be ATTACKED. Trump response fierce. War hawks equate Non-intervensionist = isolationism.
What is difference between Managed Decline and non interventionist policy. The Bushes seemed to want to get us into every conflict to some degree. Trump to his credit is not the guy who says let’s go to war with everyone.
20:20 Col Mills I think there is a significant difference. Managed decline is we are not that different we are just like everyone else. The British Socialists turned the British Empire into a socialist state that was totally focused on a cradle to grave massive expansion of social services that is unsustainable. Focused on making the citizen [actually SUBJECT] a ward of the state because we are hapless feckless and without the state could not survive. So it is a different concept.
I am a big believer in the Trump Doctrine. We are going to minimize our conflict. We are going to minimize our foreign involvement BUT deterrents and capability are always going to be there to deter conflict. But if you cross a red line we are going to hit you so hard you are not going to know what happened.
That is different from the Bushes which is this perpetual: we are always going to be massively deployed forward in conflict.
22 minutes: Dave: most people have made up mind on whether should have been in Afghanistan or Iraq. Later faulty reports on weapons of mass destruction. Bushes & Clinton forever wars They were fine with us over extended ourselves until there was no sense of mission no sense of victory no sense of coming home. Bushes would wrap themselves in American Flag. I didn’t like that. We were still holding on to 9/11 which what ever the causes, brought us together briefly.
But that changed with Obama, where we were apologetic for our greatness. Apologetic for everything.
23:45 Col Mills: It is this leading from the rear, It’s this kind of third person, we’re in the bleachers wathing, we are going to let others take the lead. This makes no sense. We had the most capability, we are the most influential. I have done so much in the Special Op community and the office of sec of defense, so much international partner collaboration and partner building. THEY DESPERATELY WANT OUR LEADERSHIP!
And the Carter, Clinton Obama mentality is We’re the cause of the problem, by us even saying anything we are causing problems, so we’re going to let YOU LEAD THE CONVERSATION. When in actuality, most of these countries, the reason they are even dialogging with us is they look up to us. They desperately want to know what we have to say, they desperately want to say, your the greatest country in the world, SHARE WITH US. TALK TO US TELL US. And instead they get this John Kerry abstract lecturing that no one can make any sense out of…. They DESPISE being lectured to in the abstract about multilateral-ism, about all these Belfer Center Concepts. It’s like give me something tangible and actionable.
That is why I totally reject everyones comment that Oh. They didn’t like Trump. Actually I was in a lot of those meetings And THEY LOVED TRUMP because he was CLEAR with ACTIONABLE with TANGIBLE and when he spoke that had umph that had gravitous behind it.
25:54 Dave: He was also a threat in the sense that he looked at the cost/benefit. He’s a guy in deal making. He knows a good deal vs a bad deal. And business was great for the Haliburtons, business was great for the ‘primes’ if you will, prime contractors. BUT they were not in the business of the Tax Payer getting a bargain and TRUMP THREATENED THAT by saying what is the international community doing. Are they holding up their end of the bargain. How much tax payer money is going to maintain their security in countries we have been in for a very long time. That made him public enemy #1 for the military Industrial complex.
2.
Dave: Let me switch gears. In 2008, at start of Obama years what were you doing.
27 minutes Col Mills: I was actually on the nat’l Security Council at the White House at the tail end of the Bush year & beginning of Obama. I was the senior dept. defence rep for what was called the Comprehensive Cyber Security Initiative. Most of it is unclassified. But was a massive ramp up of American cyper security capabilities. The Largest. Not all have been unclassified. It was one of my tasks during Obama years. It took us 18 months to de-classifiy certain potions of it. Democrats spend 60 to 90 days reviewing previous Admin.
It goes back to Dick Clarke, in 2002 & 2003. (Carter) In addition to IDing Al Qaeda, Bin Laden and saw our greatest strategic liability as our cyber vulnerabilities. Which lead to the CNCI program being established in 2007.
So the Obama admin reviewed it and not only did they like it, THEY LOVED IT, AND THEY WANTED MORE OF IT! And they wanted to pour gasoline on it. Because it provided breathtaking and magical capabilities. Which lead to some of the abuses we discovered later during SPYGATE. As to my shock, many of these collection capabilities actually were foundational to SPYGATE.
29:15 Dave OK so we survive 8 years of attack on foundational things we THOUGHT WERE SACROSANCT, like health care from a Constitutional stand point. & Obamacare, we had the rise of Edward Snowden & the disclosures that were there. And then you have this last year of the Obama Admin where most people were betting on Hillary Clinton getting a shot. You have an upset, but not an upset for the American people. he seemed to be invincible. Thanks to the Apprentice people knew him and had a sense of who he was so he was able to brush off attacks that would have destroyed any other candidate.
So you have this period of time and you also have General Mike Flynn in the midst of his time with the Defense Intelligence agency. Trump likes what he is hearing from this guy, so there are a lot of moving parts. So what I want you to drill down now is, during that transition, Col John Mills, what were you seeing in real time and perhaps, what were you asked to do by the various heads of different agencies.
31:45 minutes: Col Mills It on one hand it is complex and on the other it is simple. With this ramp-up of cyber capabilities, which provided an intoxicating increase year per year in the ability to collect big data and use big data analytics at cyber speed to make sense and take action. And there is a lot more behind what I am talking about which I am not allowed to say. But if you were to stand on the watch floors of these major centers and watch and see the simultaneous capabilities it was breath taking.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FBI watching terrorist but doing NOTHING, yet goad and lead and go after Patriots.
Haney murder called suicide.
What purpose of Afghanistan, Taliban, open borders???? FALSE FLAG??? SEE: Napolitano
33 minutes Dave: So let me stop here. Most people don’t have.. Don’t share anything you can’t. Are you talking about a ?borg? movie and being able to in like a work room… the immediacy of finding information, whether it is surveillance through video, OR…. Col Mills : ALL OF THE ABOVE Dave: OK, so that’s not just Hollywood. So we have the ability to drill down and have a map of everyone’s LIFE, really. If you look at the metadata it tells us so much.
33 minutes – Col Mills: It really matured in 2012 under General Keith Alexander, and we also created Cyber Command in addition to NSA. But yes, the simultaneous capability to collect data of all kinds, pictures, voice traffic, data packages, data traffic machine to machine, internet, etc… Monitor Collect and INTEGRATE ALL OF THESE, it was an incredible capability.
Dave: Where do you come down on that. I am a small l libertarian. Libertarians are considered so naive because of the very things you are talking about. But at the same time we have got this thing called the Bill of Rights. we’ve got this thing called the fourth Amendment, we’ve got this thing called an OATH and I know you had to take to uphold and defend the Constitution.
What happens to the 4th Amendment. Have you had to do a gut check to be in the intel community. OK I know what I swore an oath to, I know what it says, something about having probable cause, someone being suspected of a crime, and yet many of the disclosures of Snowden shows that. No this was bulk collection thru a FISA Court, it is almost like a rubber stamp.
Explain to us. That might be a question a lot of us would like to ask is how do you reconcile the machine that you didn’t create but you are in the soup, right, How do you make sense of this by being a good soldier or someone who is serving my country while knowing this has got to be dangerous. It is almost like splitting the atom. Good stuff but a lot of bad stuff could happen.
35:20 – Col Mills Well this is a, again the alliance between the US Government and Google and Big Tech, didn’t really.. I was there the first few years of the Obama admin & there was a dance. But they came together in 2010, 2012 and to address your specific question, I have mentioned the word INTOXICATING. That is the challenge, once this magic is unleashed, and policy makers appointed or elected or carreerists start to see the capabilities it becomes INTOXICATING and it is no longer can we the question a reasonable person who has taken an oath to the Constitution should be raising is should we. And do we have the proper control mechanisms. Are people who are doing this doing it for the correct and right purposes. And I think the challenge is the collection far surpassed the standing checks such as the FISA process. It totally swamped and overwhelmed it.
This is where POTUS Trump’s term the Swamp and the Deep State. At first when I first heard those terms I was going I don’t know what they mean and after a while I realized I’m IN IT. I help to create this!
We need more & more White Hats to stand up and question this because these capabilities have begun to be used in mass against the American People to suppress and censor. We are facing an absolutely unprecedented Iron Curtain of censorship, that that, I do not mean this pejoratively or simplistically. Liberals always like to bemoan the McCarthy era, well I go there is only one person, if you understand history, that lost there job and that was McCarthy. Everyone else came out far better who were on “The Blacklist” Well I am sorry but this is McCarthyism on steroids, what we are dealing with right now. A lot of the foundational tools and capabilities were created for originally good purposes. [SEE: Haney above] Of course we want to track terrorists but we also have people who are in power now who have a very interesting definition of ‘Terrorist’ and they are using these capabilities in the wrong direction and the wrong way.
3.
38:25 Dave The next question I want to ask you picking up from what you just said is, You have this thing that I’ve heard of and it’s Hammer and Scorecard. Is this real? [@ ~38:45 you can see Col Mills stifle a laugh] What do you know about Hammer and Scorecard. You talk of the Cyber Strategic Command, this unholy alliance between Google, the Obama Administration around 2012. But a lot of this stuff you are talking about is alarming for a couple reasons. Because when I was a prosecutor I learned about this system called Prism. [ @ ~39:15 Col Mills starts nodding.] And Prism was being used in a way where the DEA was giving tips to other law enforcement agencies and of course the prosecutors weren’t informed. Because if we knew the source of the tip, you have to disclose it under Brady vs Maryland. Under the confrontation clause everyone, everyone who is criminally accused should be able to ask questions of the people in the system. [@ ~39:35 Col Mills smile widens] And they created this way of training to hide and keep secret Prism so you had parallel reconstruction. [Nods again]
So when you talk about this intoxicating power, WOW so if you can keep this secret, [@39:55 BIG NOD] we can start GAMING the way we go after ‘Bad People’ [opens mouth and shakes head] and perhaps in the ‘name of GOOD’ get a result but violate certain Constitutional protections where we are actually as big a lawbreakers as the people we are going after. [Nods again]
I know PRISM is different than Hammer and Scorecard, but a lot of these terms we hear about and it is almost like this mythic thing. But it is becoming more relevant now because we have watched Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium. We’ve seen what appears to be packet captures. And a lot of people are saying where did this stuff come from. Is there a plausible theory based on sources since that seems to be the Million Dollar Question. Maybe you can’t answer that, but I was at the Cyber Symposium, [Col Mills’ eyes shift to left several times] I tried to ask everyone and their Mom, as a Law prof, I do not know where to even begin to ask those questions. Since I have you here, I know I just threw a lot at you. — UMMM HAMMER & SCORECARD, what do we need to know about that….
41:26 Col Mills OK, under the laws regarding Top Secret there is essentially a 25 year embargo on top secret level information, so I will obfuscate here [Dave laughs, OK] But I think you are hitting the nail on the head. These capabilities easily pervert what was originally what was on white hats mind on… We all want to see justice done. We want to see lawful civil society. We want to see bad people put away. But unfortunately unless you constantly check yourself or there is a way you are held accountable, and there are control measures on the floor at NSA and other intelligence centers and during main operations. You have to be careful. I would say up until recently it was very common to self-report when you accidentally collected on an American. That was considered right and noble and those things happened…. Have to call in the lawyers….
I think unfortunately with some it was past that where it became a tee-hee, tee-hee LOOK AT WHAT WE CAN DO. And LOOK at how we can SPY on someone who has just become nominated as a candidate to become President. Tee-hee, tee-hee, let’s all go up to Fort Mead and have a small group meeting. And share the information tee-hee, tee-hee.
So I think the challenge is the lack of transparency, the velocity of collection, the exponential increase in the ability to collect. It really throws a lot of the accepted norms and practices out the window. Because it is now the J Edger Hoover mentality that takes over. Where who cares we are the final arbitrators of goodness, therefore That’s OUR CALL AND WE ARE GOING TO DO IT.
43:58 – Dave You gave me the best non-answer I have ever heard.
But you let me know why, so I am hearing from John Mills that you can neither confirm nor deny the existence of a certain program.
@44:10 – Col Mills On Hammer & Scorecard I will say I have been part of so many darned named operations and code words, sometimes it gets a little foggy in my mind. But there were cabilities developed and this was back during … I will group Hammer & Scorecard if it did exist.. crossed with the capabilities during the 2005 to 2008… so even before Obama was on board.
I call these remote access capabilities. Which, I am not going to name the person, but back in the 80s kinda pioneered the original remote access through dial-up. I kinda call Ferris Bueller’s Day Off [https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091042/] There is this one gentleman he is fairly well known, and he no longer works for the agency, he is retired. And actually he was out in your neck of the woods there at one of the Labs and held one of the Chair Seats out there. And he pioneered the access thru dial-ups [Dave is chuckling & nodding ] Which is the first generation of remote access and he was going WOW, just like Ferris Bueller was going and figuring out how to access and change grades. So people went WOW, I can just dial-up and change anything I want to, this is cool! So some crazy things went on.
@45:50 – DAVE I am going to move on, but the reason I am asking the question maybe to plant the seed for some questions ahead.
Is the mechanism of how, cyber interference took place in 2020, 2018, 2016, [@46:15 Col Mills nods] The tools of the trade..
The question I want to ask anyone because I am operating on blind faith, is that you have got this very public campaign, of Mike Lindell [Col’s Eyes shift left] putting his money where his mouth is. Finding White Hats and Patriots, [Col’s Eyes shift left] part of me says look, God Bless Himm, but I don’t believe the fate of the free world, and the information collected by Mike Lindell, like it is all depending on this man. When we had someone as savvy as President Trump, the Commander in Chief, the most powerful man world and just to review his greatness, I have been catching up on The Art of The Deal, [ Col smiles & nods] And seeing how the man’s mind works. I just find it unfathomable that the military during his watch, whether it is 2018 or 2020, [Col’s Eyes shift left] didn’t have the real time ability, to monitor what was going on. [Col Mills INTERUPTS…]
@47:25 – Col Mills OK so we are now to a very specific question. So here is my VIEW POINT ON IT. <=== [a bit if a strawman?]
One, I love Mike Lindell and I am a big supporter of Mike Lindell. Two, was there foreign interference? I THINK ABSOLUTELY.
In the first two films that Mike presented, which were really the work of Dennis Montgomery and Mary Fanning [Hammer & Scorecard] Umm, Umm, Let me just say, umm… I, I, I, …analyzed this and there were 6 possible outcomes, bottom line that quality and that visibility is essentially nation state level.
AND Unless you are standing at the watch floor of Fort Mead or the FBI has some capability, or DHS, you aren’t going to see that BUT they didn’t see that I hold the Federal Government to the SAME STANDARDS. The reality is there is only a few federal laws on the conduct of elections so neither Law Enforcement nor the Intelligence Community HAD THE LEGAL AUTHORITY CHARTER STARTING POINT TO LOOK THE RIGHT DIRECTION FOR THE RIGHT EVIDENCE and I know Chris Krebs [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Krebs], I know what went on. They did not have the people, program, resources, legal authority, or even KNOW HOW of how elections are conducted. To tune our collection capabilities to look for the right things.
So I question what Dennis Montgomery and Mary Fanning presented but at the same time I hold the Federal Government to the SAME STANDARDS and they are not being truthful because they do not have the legal charter to begin with on the conduct of elections, they do not have experience on the conduct of elections. So when Chris Krebs says or when Paul Nakasone [https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Nakasone_03-25-21.pdf] says most secure election ever, THEY HAVE NO IDEA.
I think it would be far more truthful for them to say we aren’t trained to do this, we don’t know what to look for, we do not have the people, programs or resources.
@50:00 Dave:
Perhaps the question I am asking, perhaps there is only a small number of people who know the answer. I gather that Chris Krebs didn’t know what he is talking about as soon as he opened his mouth based on just common sense of what was going on in real time…. [lists examples of fraud] Trump was tweeting in advance about how fraud was going to be carried out. [@ 50:45 Col Mills eyes to left, then looks down smiles and tries to hide a laugh] It was almost as if he had a crystalball. And umm [Col Interupts]
@50:52: Col Mills I’ll tell yeah, I was asked to write almost a hundred memos to analyze from spring of 2020 to December 2020 umm ahh on essentially umm what election integrity was, what that meant, I’ll claim I coined the term election integrity. And the RNC seemed to magically discover the term on Jan 7th. But I wrote many memos on that. On July there was a tweet from the president that essentially came from one of the things that I wrote. [cuts eyes to the right twice] So there was a small group of us that saw it coming. And WE KNEW THE FIX WAS IN.
And we were willing to do some analysis. And not just operate from an accepted narrative.
@52:00 – Dave OK, so I am glad to hear that. And you mentioned that Krebs & Co. either weren’t looking at the problem, or had the resources to evaluate it. But there have been discussions at least in some circles about the Exec Order that was signed in 2018 that dealt with foreign interference. [Col smiles and nods head emphatically] Any thoughts as to why it would have been signed. [Col. bursts out laughing] And I want to say that it was re-authorized last September which would have covered one calendar year [interrupt yeh, and still laughing smiling] and the timing of that is there any hope that perhaps although the swamp is deep, there seems to be a lot of people surrounding the President that don’t seem to be looking out for him or We the People. What do you think prompted that and instead of telling me about whether something has happened as a result of it cause I don’t think you will be able to give me an answer to that. What COULD HAVE BEEN DONE BASED ON THAT EXECUTIVE ORDER BEING SIGNED.
@53:14 — Col Mills yeah, very simple, most of this fell upon the shoulders of the Attorney General. And the swampiest part of this swamp is I would say, in some ways I’d say a tie between the Dept of State but it is really the Department of Justice. In some ways Barr did more than any attorney general ever attempted to break up the swamp but he finally caved, folded and came out throwing the president under the bus. Most of this would fall under the attorney general to look into specific things.
One of the basic elements the Attorney General has never enforced, is three elements in 18 US code. There is no debate about it you have to be a US citizen to vote yet counties and states have worked with the DOJ willfully to register voters who are unlawful. … Barr FAILED to ENFORCE. In Virginia, 8 to 12 % are unlawful. We got that via jury duty rejection which comes straight from the voter roles.
4.
@ 55:15 Dave: OK now speaking of Attorney Generals, we have the beginning of the Trump admin, you’re still keeping an eye on the cyber components and the cyber threats to our nation. I am getting a lot of questions about the timing or purpose of Jeff Sessions. The very short tenure. The reason why it comes up is because of the timing of when John Durham came on board. Heres another mystery figure that none of us see him, none of us hear from him. I think we started to hear from him oddly enough, from Bill Barr. There are some things that are curious. Apple informed Adam Shiff and Eric Swalwell who were two high ranking members of the intel committee. Oh BTW we have been disclosing documents and stuff you have been in possession of over the past four years. I think that came out this past May. As a prosecutor who has convined Grand Juries, you have to have the subpoena power to do that. And it has to originate from some where. The fact that Apple was complying with some sort of subpoena for four years was very curious because that would have pre-dated Bill Barr. Oddly enough it seems to start with the start of the Trump admin. And you have this very short lived appointment of Jeff Sessions. You have had some interfacing with John Durham thru your work. Can you connect some of the dots for us on what do you know about John Durham. What have you don to help assist this. And is there anything I have said that you can flesh out and separate fact from fiction.
@ 57:35 — Col. Mills Quick chronology from the summer of 2016. I was in the halls of the Pentagon in the summer of 16 just a few days before the Republican Convention to nominate Trump. And someone who had been a Bush appointee, I ran into him and said, you’re going to support Trump Right? And I will never forget this, this is literally verbatim what he said:
No, We see more OPPORTUNITIES with HER!
I got in his face and said who is WE? And what opportunities do you see? From that point on I was a thousand percent Trump. And that is when I realized there is a Swamp.
So Summer of 16 is really when Crossfire Hurricane really started. And Comey and Brennan.
Now I was part of something linking back to C&CI. There was a body called the Cyber Response Group, [CRG] that I kind of departed about 2014. But the CRG kinda became important and maybe was the body… We heard about unmasking, Susan Rice, things like that…. So the CRG I helped set up way back in 2007, 2008. But the Obama Admin kinda repurposed that group. And just because of the roles and responsibilities I don’t think they wanted me in it. I kinda ceased participating. The CRG kinda became the center of gravity for certain special Cyber things OK? Which may have included the unmasking activities in 2015, 2016. So I think they were starting to really ramp up for the election, conveniently had these incredible collection capabilities, as things moved towards summer of 2016, and Trump being nominated, and when Trump was nominated in summer of 2016, I think all the capabilities started to focus on him.
All those capabilities we were talking about pivoted anda Significant Element Let’s FOCUS ON THIS TARGET.
@ 1:00:25 – DAVE Do you think that would have occurred if you had some establishment like Mitt Romney? Do you think that apparatus [INTERRUPT]
1:00:35 – Col Mills I think it would have happened and they would have beat the stuffing out of Mitt Romney, 300 dollar hair cut guys I like to call them, and he would have just lost gracefully. Because that tradition and lineage, as I have delved more into election integrity and politics, There is a money class and a donor class and a political class that is far more concerned with ‘gracefully losing’
So Yeah, they would have focused on Romney, they would have beat the stuffing out of him, he would and the RNC would have collected a lot of money and said, Well guys we gave it the old college try. We will just have to donate MORE MONEY to try it again next time.
1:00:12 – Dave So I guess my question is,… I have disabused myself in thinking there is a great difference between the Left and the Right, I have heard Eric Winestein refer to K-fabrication it is a lot like Professional wrestling….[Prof’s, recollections he is a fan. Col Mills laughs] … Do you have a sense there is a Deep State that says, you know something, A lot of this is just OPTICS, [Col smiles and nods and goes UnHuh] and sometimes the Ds are going to get their ways, and sometimes the Rs are going to get their’s but what is important is that we do not disturb the status quo on a few major things like, the Military Industrial complex, the Federal Reserve policies, make sure you do not touch that Federal Reserve, things like that. Or do you really think there is these deep divided factions between Left and Right. Because when I see George W. holding hands and sharing mementos with Michelle Obama, When I see the affection after they go thru the wars and then all of a sudden when they retire, they are all best friends. It reminds me of Professional Wrestling. Do you have that same sense?
1:03:00 – Col Mills It has evolved into that direction. That is what it has become and I mentioned that discussion that I ran into a Bush appointee and I asked him, you’re going to support Trump Right? And his response is:
No we see more opportunities with her.
In my mind that immediately flashed, Oh my gosh, there IS NO DIFFERENCE, They are the same thing. There is this little show dynamics, sometimes we win, sometimes we lose, but it is predominantly a D lead Swamp and the Republicans are, it is just like with, Newt Gingrich and his Revolution in 94, he came in and was originally told, We are the minority, don’t worry about it, don’t do anything, just spend most of your day playing golf. NO!, not going to do that so he was a disruptive event.
Trump was a disruptive event. NO! I am not going to play along with this.
So, Yes there is, Romney will SAY, Oh, No I am fighting for these values – No he isn’t. He is very happy to lose gracefully, because they are benefactors of the same process. It has evolved into that.
1:04:15 – Dave Let me drill down on one thing, I touched on but I haven’t gotten your thoughts on yet. You talked about this intoxicating machinery that started to be aimed at Pres. Trump in the summer of 2016. This guy is not good for the Swamp. Find out everything you can about him, let’s crush this guy. And then something happened. He wasn’t CRUSHED, every poll was wildly off, every single celebrity and stink News Host was eating Humble Pie. But it didn’’t take them long from saying he’s here so let’s never let this happen again. So take us thru that fall of Sept 16 and I want to get your thoughts on John Durham as well.
1:05:15 – Col Mills So I think what happened is, Trump’s their guy so focus all resources on CRUSHING HIM. But they had not perfected the art thru electronic means thru election machines, thru absentee voting means, they had not perfected the art of dominating the vote yet. That occurred in 2020. They did not realize that Trump would generate this turnout, this interest that he had. Especially in several key states.
But they wanted to CRUSH AND DESTROY HIM ANYWAY.
So in early October, I was at a dinner in London, and it just so happened, that someone who was a very senior official in the FBI essentially the head of Cyber at the FBI for a number of years. Who retired and went to work for a major up and coming cyber firm that I am not going to mention right now. But I think you can start putting the pieces together and figure out who I am talking about and which Cyber Security firm. I was there on a Five Eyes information sharing meeting in London. And I had been invited to this dinner. This very senior former official, I believe it was October 6th, 2016. There were about 100 of us at this dinner, most everybody is an elite, a Globalist. At these dinners we are asked to stand up and say something about ourselves and something we are passionate about. And he stood up and I have know this guy for a number of years, Sat at the White House with him, been at many meeting with him, and he had been very helpful to me, in some other endeavors which caused a great deal of allegiance to him.
When the microphone came to him, he stood up and says, TRUMP IS A RUSSIAN ASSET AND WE’RE GOING TO PROVE IT! He was adamant, passionate, he had a meltdown. I had never seen him do this.
Most of the people in the room are going ?? PFFFFttt [WTF??] What are you talking about, Hillary’s going to win. And he is like WE ARE GOING TO PROVE IT!
As more information came out, I believe he was in London at the behest of James Comey, and to coordinate with Gina Haspel on collection against Trump….. With the timeline of the events that I have seen…. It was documented by Rick Grennell and Ratcliffe, information declassified last fall, very important, that Comey gave the green light to spin Crossfire Hurricane up to highest levels. Essentially in the last few days of Sept, early Oct…. And I am pretty sure that personality was there.
I have 27 pages in front of John Durham. [Eyes cut to left twice, & stutters] I hope something happens.
We have to be a Constitutional based society.
5.
1:21:47 – Col Mills Well I think it was all of the above. [eyes to left] But I will mention there was a gentleman [eyes left] who was deputy assistant sec for defense for cyber, I was in another office but I worked closely with. He moved up to be with Ash Carter, as essentially Chief of Staff and a person called Eric Rosenbock. I think he is one of the interesting personalities in this….. I remember seeing him the day, after the election and he was a zombie…. And I talked to him… He was in shock…. It was rumored that very likely… Alexander was director of NSA and Cyber command and they were going to separate and word was Rosenbock under Hillary would be director of NSA. And he would be in a strategic position to go back and review some of the collections going on during 2016. Your listeners can interpret what that means. [remove embarrassing D communications and tweek other communications so they could be used to convict enemies would be my guess. – ‘beating Donald Trump is not enough. He has to be crushed to the earth, and squashed like a bug. We have to burn down his village, pillage his valley, shame his horde and send his army into hiding so that he and his ugly, hate-spewing kind never rise again.’ READ ==> https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/donald-trump-lose-badly-abolish-hate-brewing-u-s-article-1.2724357 ]
I think he was an important player, he is at the Balfour center @ Harvard right now.
There were a lot of personalities, I mentioned Susan Rice and the unmasking that the CRG may have had a role in.
1:24:00 – Dave So you have all this stuff going on. And then you have the inauguration. Trump gets by despite the efforts of the enemy to saboyage [Col nods] And then you have what looks like major leaking going on. [Col oh yeah, oh yeah]
1:24:20 – Col Mills You had the Vindmans… who were unbelievable, unprofessional, unethical. You had the Deep Staters running around. Remember the Executive Office of the President is roughly about 7,000 folks. Many of them are careerists and military that have been detailed over from their departments and agencies. And Again DC [Dave- Interrupts]
1:24:55 – Dave So do you think Trump responded day one to deal with the leaks.
1:25:00 – Col Mills I think there are too many Never Trumpers on his administration. There were too many careerists that were actively working and facilitating, — again the person who invited me was a carreerist who called me up and said John we need you on this group. And he was just GIDDY WITH EXCITEMENT cause we’re gonna PROVE… and he is a careerist. He should not have a position. So from Day one it was challenging. [I think they used ‘Trump is a Russia asset’ to POISON anyone who would other wise be neutral.–GC] You mentioned Jeff Sessions. I really liked Jeff Sessions. I think Jeff Sessions Faux Pax was he acted as if there was normalcy going on. [He still believed we had rule of law – GC] And he thought he was doing the right thing by… Because that is what we do as professionals, we appoint Special Counsels [Remember these were his colleagues and friends. I do not think he was aware of how bad the rot and EVIL was and actually though he was going to clear Trump’s name. – GC] Instead of saying NO! I want more evidence and detail. [Which he actually could not do because of his conflict of interest -GC] Because it was a fraud, a lie, 18 US Code a false statement by a Federal Official…. Comey and Brennan should be indicted for false statements at a minimum. I think Jeff Sessions was lied to. But he thought he was doing the right thing.
1:26:30 – Dave – Right thing you mean by recusing himself
Col Mills, by recusing himself and by allowing the appointment of a special prosecutor. Up until that time there was a BC -AD in Washington. 2016, BC with Trump it was after that.
1:26:55 – Dave We have been going a long time, I am learning a lot and I am loving it I want to touch on two people though. You have General Mike Flynn, [ eyes to left] there was a thought for a role in the Trump admin. That did not come to fruition. Any observations 2016 on. Either the threat that Flynn presented to the Deep State. [chewing lips.] Because there was obviously there was a bogus entrapment case if you want to call it that that was set-up to incriminate him over nothing since we have just established that the Russia Hoax was a BIG LIE. [Smile.]
So let’s start there, what do you make of Mike Flynn during this time frame.
Col Mills: He is another disruptive event. He is a disruptive event to the Army General and to the military general officers, flag officer culture because he is an American patriot. And he wants to do the right thing. As we have discovered under the current Chairman Milley, What in the bloody world has happened top our general officers and admirals gofos serving Caesar and not the Constitution. Trump was disruptive, Flynn was disruptive, he was a threat. He was a threat to small ‘C’ conservative military culture, he was a threat to the swamp. They contrived, took him out and this contrived PENCE firing, I thought, did Pence KNOW it was all fake? I don’t know, but in the end Pence Choked on Jan 6, 2021. When I believe he had a lawful…. Where he should have AT LEAST asked clarifying questions of the State electors. He chose not to, he choked and the rest is history. So this contrived firing, Flynn was disruptive and a threat.
6.
JOHN DURHAM I think this is critical so a bit of background info.
July 17 2021: X-22 Report Why They Can’t Find Special Counsel John Durham https://x22report.com/why-they-cant-find-special-counsel-john-durham/ This goes into how the media got Bill Clinton off the hook. “…prosecutor Ken Starr made one huge mistake right at the start after he was appointed by a panel of judges to handle a very politically sensitive investigation involving a series of shady-looking bank loans related to a failed land deal called “Whitewater”…. The mistake Starr made was that he opted to be as completely transparent as he could during the course of his investigation, to demonstrate he was not some secret inquisitor. And Democrats and their news media allies took full and complete advantage of Starr’s naïve transparency…. Whereas before such vicious scorched-earth tactics had been reserved for the multiple women who had dared to come forward and publicly talk about their liaisons with Clinton – or about his attempts to sexually force himself upon them – now they would utilize upon a Special Counsel and his staff….”
prognosticatasaurusrex https://www.theqtree.com/community/profile/prognosticatasaurusrex/ “…involving my previous and current employer who just happened to purchase a health care system that was losing @50 MILLION a month, and could not be GIVEN away. The purchase went through late Oct 2019…just before…Covid started to rear its ugly head. To make a long story short, the “worthless” health care system NOW turns a multi million dollar PROFIT. Just 2 short years later…and trust me it has NOTHING to do with improved “management”, and ALL to do with “special” funding given to hospitals, research, and health care providers for Covid…..”
“….Durham, recently indicted Michael a Sussman, a Hillary Clinton and Perkins Coie (remember them from all my writings?) lawyer. On the surface it seemed a big nothing burger meant to distract and placate us on team MAGA, while the Arizona audit was being revealed. The MSM even helped to propagate that narrative. BUT, if one were to read the entire 27 pages, it was NOT a nothing burger, but a PREDICATE. This is THE ground work. It is, I truly believe, the beginning of the END of ALL of them…..” READ THE REST https://www.theqtree.com/2021/10/01/dear-kag-2021-10-01/comment-page-2/#comment-809435
“…about The Sullivan part, but it was apparently to bid to reply to. I am hearing that Priestap, Baker, and get this Page and Strzok are now “cooperating” If that is true, shit is about to get deep for the FBI, CIA, and the DS. Baker et al lead DIRECTLY to the Obama WH, and that INCLUDES Bite me. Remember that infamous Jan 5th meeting? IF Durham gets ANY player there, it is GO time….” READ THE REST https://www.theqtree.com/2021/10/01/dear-kag-2021-10-01/comment-page-2/#comment-810268
………………..
Back to the transcript:
Dave: We are going to go rapid fire, I still have not heard about JOHN DURHAM [Both smiling] What do you know about John Durham. Give me your best thoughts on how he fits into this and is there any hope. [big smile] I am of the mind, and I will give you my thought on this. When I was a prosecutor, I went after indictments I never presented a media report. [nods] I never issued a report to the media… I never did that once [Eyes shift left.]…. Why would I tell what I have on the bad guys so they can now prepare. [continues to smile] I find that very bizarre. I know that Mueller had this report. Maybe that is part of the cultural zeitgeist we are all expecting to be debriefed. [eyes shift left twice.] Mueller, what he was doing was political theatre. If Durham is real [opens mouth to speak] and there is actual meat on the bones, [smiles] tactically that would be a very STUPID thing to do.
But is John Durham Real?
What bearing does your work have if anything on what John Durham is doing? [big smile]
And from a timeline stand point do you have a firm sense of when he entered the picture?
Col Mills: As you know he is a prosecutor and as you know all these things are held close to the vest as law enforcement sensitive and as legal preceedings. So let me go, a lot of this is not publicaly known, it is not even known to involve-es such as me. I submited my 27 pages. It took me almost two years to absolutely insure that they had it, they received it, they acknowledged it and hopefully something was going to be done with it.
Dave: When did you submit your 27 pages.
Col Mills: Well I submitted it several times. But I didn’t have confirmation, it was early 2020. I was submitting pieces of it to DOJ and Barr since early 2018.
Dave: Ok so your part of that the 27 pages, does that more or less cover what you shared with our audience about the lack of good faith with Comey already having a pre-determined decision and having something he was going to sign off on. Was that what you were submitting to John Durham? Your involvement on basically giving a rubber stamp for the Russia hoax.
@1:31:50 Col Mills: Yeah it was that but it was even beyond that. I mean this one important detail. I happened to be at a meeting in DC in early 2018. And the person I was meeting came in and said you know the whose in the next room? No no whose in the next room? They said a guy named Michael Hayden. General Micheal Hayden. He is on his twice a week coordinating call – THIS IS EARLY 2018, early 2018 — he is on his twice a week coordinating call with Brennan who is OUT OF OFFICE, COMEY who is in OFFICE [Trump fired Comey on May 9, 2017], And I believe it was Mueller who was the forth personality. WHAT in the BLOODY WORLD are these four people, some who were actually in office… Why are they coordinating talking points. And they are FROM ONE SIDE OF THE AISLE and FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF THE AISLE and like you said they are together. [WIKI–”… investigation was conducted by special prosecutor Robert Mueller from May 2017 to March 2019.” Col Mills may have his dates mixed and this was in early 2017 before the Special Council when Comey was still in office.]
Dave: If memory serves, Brennan had his privileges (clearance?] revoked. [Col. nods] That is why they started taking jobs with CNN and so it is odd that some of those folks like Comey was still privy to information. [NO NOT FORGET NEED TO KNOW!!!] It sounds like he was sharing information with folks that he shouldn’t be. Col Mills says ABSOLUTELY!!!
So what I am going to do now is a rapid fire line of questions if you can answer these with a very short answer….
So if you had to ID a person [½ smile] that presents the greatest threat domestically to the Republic. Not talking of foreign actors. Who comes to mind. [Col big smile]
1:33:54 Col Mills: WOW, Comey, Brennan, Hayden, and Hayden I had so much respect for, I really thought he was incredible, I think the 3 of them are bad actors. I think the entire current admin. is uninterested in a constitutional concept called America.
Dave: So not one person but a Hydra with many heads.
…….
I think they are missing the fact the ‘hydra’ is just the go-fors.
7.
This gets into China.
BACKGROUND: Jack Posobiec, Joe Hoft and Steve Bannon has been warning that China is not in good shape. China Is In A Financial Crisis (6 minutes) https://rumble.com/vnbutg-china-is-in-a-financial-crisis.html
……
Back to the transcript.
Dave: Same question but foreign stage. You mentioned China
Col Mills: That’s China absolutely. With the debacle in Kabul by this administration demonstrating an absolute lack of resolve or interest in asserting American values much less the coalition of liberal democrat republics in their opposition to China, We/they have created an almost unstopable trajectory towards world war. China looks at the fecklessness of this administration as a Green Light. Now they are under great duress at home. Shi is under great domestic duress. We don’t realize it. [Counting on his fingers]
They input roughly 50% of their food.
Roughly 50% of their energy
The have to conduct all their transactions in the almighty dollar. [Not true. Australia has a deal to deal in yen.]
We can easily constrict them and disable them by squeezing any of them or all three of those.
Afghanistan gave them the land bridge to their oil access in Iran.
A lot of their food comes from America and if the current resident of the white house was serious about asserting American and Western interests he would use that as leverage. 3.Xi is on a rampage destroying his own companies and IPOs because of the fear he has of his own big Tech. So he is kinda taking care of that for us. It is bizzare he is destroying his own economy because he feels they are a threat. But it is China China China.
Dave: So there is basically a Chinese Deep State that he is dealing with even though we don’t see them as the good guys in what ever iteration. [smiles & nods]
The food is interesting because I have seen a bit of a propaganda campaign with the Bill Gates and the GMOs [eyes shift left twice] of the world who are trying to persuade us to eat really really crappy food.[eyes shift left] There is this really big kick to get us away from beef and cattle and stuff that provides great nutrition [eyes shift left, smiles] and I bring that up because I know that China is one of the primary consumers of meat, beef [nods] and we have got what they don’t have which is these large swaths of grazing lands. And it just makes you wonder if that propaganda campaign to get people on the Burger King Impossible burger or these documentaries like plant nation. [eyes shift left] If that’s part of the propaganda wing. And I say that because we already see that when it comes to distribution, Chinese control of our theaters, Chinese control over what movies America can show in their respective land. There are quotas on the number of films. It is kind of interesting that you brought up those three pillars. I do not think people realize how important the food component is. That is one of the major areas that we could apply tremendous pressure to reassert ourselves. [nods]
OK now I want to end on a more positive note. So let me ask you this John, You and I seem to be on the same page with what occurred November 3rd as being tantamount to a coup. What hope do you have and what gives you the resolve to fight each day. Cause I’ll tell you right now, that I talked on the phone with Lin Wood, yesterday for about 2 hours. And we are both tired. We have been fighting every day in any way we know how [nods] and it was humbling because Lin has been fighting a long time taking on all comers but it was the first time I sensed a weariness from him. Something has got to give. [murmurs assent] It’s September. If we go thru another election cycle and I am saying of 2021, there are other elections that are going to continue we to use these machines that we know are absolutely compromised. [eyes shift left] And if we keep overlaying garbage with more fraudulent garbage it creates the perception that everything is OK. We need to solve the murder mystery of November 3 last year. [nods] So if you could send us on our way, if there is a charge you can give my viewers on why we have got to keep fighting. Where do you draw your strength from [[eyes shift right, smile] and what would you like to see happen.
Co Mills: Well, we have no choice. There is no where else to go as I think Lt General Flynn has said. We have no choice we have to fight. Even as weary as we are as insurmountable as the odds may seem, we have no choice. We have to fight. And I think there is a growing movement that is unstoppable even though we are facing this iron curtain of censorship, I think there is a growing movement between Arizona, between Georgia, Pennsylvania. It is US the people. We’re the ones in control. It’s the COUNY, the county we must re-assert ourselves at the county level.
So I feel as tough as it may seem, as insurmountable as the odds may seem, we are actually building momentum in multiple areas and it is average individual citizens who are rising up. In Virginia we are pushing for a forensic audit. Senator Manachase is leading that the establishment doesn’t like that. They just want to focus on the gubernatorial election. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. We can take care of November 3rd and address an upcoming election. We can do these. So I have absolute faith and confidence because I can see a growing tide of citizens who will not relent they will be persistent and they will push themselves at the school board level at the county election board, its us and we are not going to accept the status quo.Because that’s what got us, we always assume someone else would take care of the election process. Yes someone else was taking care of the election process. That is why we are in this mess. It is time for us the citizen to get involved and I see it.
I have been fighting this since the 2019 elections in Virginia. I realized the utter massive fraud in Virginia. And I purposed myself so I have been going since then on this topic. I see positive momentum going our direction. We have to show resolve this is a battle of Wills. This is a battle of wills and we must persevere.
Dave: Well, Colonel John Mills, I have learned a ton tonight. You have helped connect some dots for me….
ColMills: Thank you so much Professor. Social media… Colonel ret john on Gettr …
Amazing group of veterans called: National Election Integrity Association Website WWW.NEIA.US We have some incredible films at that website…. I have trained and equipped six foreign national militaries, organized trained and equipped. We are available to organized trained and equip citizens at the county level to retake their election system, their election process and all other functions such as the county school board. We give a very specific actionable model and steps to train and equip the patriot at the county level. A number of groups are signing up across the nation and we are walking them through and we are seeing great results.
NIH is sponsoring a new TRIAL of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
The latest chess move by NIH may be a move toward truth, or it could be more smoke and mirrors. However, I am telling you now – WE THE PEOPLE can force the play to yield TRUTH, if we keep our eyes on the ball.
In my opinion, we are FORCING – by the threat of NUREMBERG 2 – various government agencies to turn away from the Faucist false narratives they KNOW will do them as much good as “We were only following orders” helped the lower-level Nazis.
For example, the recent FDA 16-3 vote AGAINST sketchy, unproven, and very likely USELESS or actually counterproductive boosters – which the Faucists had to REVERSE by diktat of CDC’s Rochelle Alinsky – tells me that people in government who KNOW THE SCORE are starting to REBEL against “top-down” medicine, if only to save their own skins.
Yes, YouTube is holding the line for Comrade Alinsky, but others are starting to move away from the pounding gavels of NUREMBERG 2, sounding from just over the horizon of time.
Notice how FAKE NEWS can’t help but go after ivermectin, even reporting that NIH is giving it a trial.
YOU’RE A JOKE, FAKE NEWS!
Now – trust me – there are a thousand ways that people inside NIH, CDC, NIAID, or FDA could game the results of this study. I may talk about some of the other methods, but there is ONE in particular that was already used against hydroxychloroquine.
Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice, shame on US.
The way to insure a FAIL of any trial of an antiviral against COVID-19 is to give it too late. That includes “standard” antivirals like acyclovir, remdesivir, etc., AND it includes non-standard antivirals like hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin.
To validly test an antiviral, you have to give it early enough that it makes a difference. For a safe but highly nonstandard (and likely WEAKER) antiviral, “early enough” means VERY EARLY.
Dr. Zelenko recognized this IMMEDIATELY. That is why he jumped on very early outpatient hydroxychloroquine PLUS azithromycin (Raoult’s therapy, moved up in time) PLUS zinc, knowing that all three have a very HIGH margin of safety, so there is no need to wait – thus better to GET THE JUMP on both SARS-CoV-2 AND bacterial pneumonia, as well as any possible zinc deficiency.
Zelenko moved Raoult’s therapy to ALMOST prophylaxis, and removed the concern of zinc deficiency, common in the elderly.
It was SIMPLE, but it was BRAVE and GENIUS.
Now – LATER – there were COWARDLY attack studies, where hydroxychloroquine was administered too late, too much, and to dying patients, long after both antiviral and antirheumatic activities would do absolutely no good.
The scientific community called these studies out, but still – SHAME.
Will it happen again here?
Not if we can help it.
WHAT WE HAVE A CHANCE TO DO HERE, IS TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS STUDY OF IVERMECTIN CAN’T BE PURPOSELY FAILED BY LATE ADMINISTRATION.
The beauty of this study is that WE THE PEOPLE are the ones who “call in” when we get COVID. The earlier that is done, the more likely that ivermectin will PROVE its awesome ability to stop COVID in its tracks.
Thus, it is imperative that truth-seeking Deplorables (or libtards who are red-pilled enough to believe me) who are at risk for COVID-19, be READY to get into this study the MOMENT they are diagnosed.
And the easiest way to do THAT is to simply do the following:
Be familiar with the study
have the site bookmarked
have its phone number saved to your contacts
Have a COVID test on hand at home
Abbott BinaxNOW test is $25 for two (2) tests
antigen test is highly accurate, is NOT a PCR test
test takes 15 minutes and is very simple to perform
Use ALL OPTIONS to accelerate delivery of the treatments
Working together to help people with COVID-19 feel better faster. Call 833-385-1880 today!
The ACTIV-6 Study
The ACTIV-6 research study is testing several medications that are already approved for other diseases to see if they can help people with mild to moderate COVID-19 feel better faster and stay out of the hospital.
If you are 30 years old or older, have tested positive for COVID-19 within the past 10 days and have at least 2 COVID-19 symptoms for 7 days or less, you can help make a difference by participating in ACTIV-6.
You can participate from anywhere in the U.S. Medications are shipped to you at no cost. You will keep track of your symptoms and how you feel over 90 days.
Medications in the ACTIV-6 Study
ACTIV-6 is evaluating repurposed medications for effective, safe treatments for mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Repurposed medications are already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for other indications. The study is now testing these medications:
Fluticasone
an inhaled steroid commonly prescribed for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fluvoxamine
a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), often prescribed for depression
Ivermectin
used to treat parasitic infections
These medications can be shipped anywhere in the United States at no cost to participants.
Why This Study Is Important
Vaccines are available, but access is limited in some areas and new, more transmissible variants of the virus are emerging in the U.S. People are still getting sick, and many remain at risk for the disease.
Results from ACTIV-6 will help researchers understand how existing medications can improve symptoms and limit hospitalizations for people with mild to moderate COVID-19.
Study Eligibility
ACTIV-6 is for you if:
You are 30 years old or older
Tested positive for COVID-19 within the past 10 days
Have at least 2 COVID-19 symptoms for 7 days or less
Frequently Asked Questions
I am enrolled in ACTIV-6. How do I report a new health concern?
Click here to report a concern or medical event to our Call Center.
Does participation cost anything?
No, there is no cost to you to participate. All activities can be conducted on a private and secure website or over the phone.
Am I compensated for participating?
You may receive a gift card of up to $100 upon completion of the study.
Better treatments for COVID-19 are still needed, especially for patients with mild to moderate illness who are not hospitalized.
ACTIV-6 is part of a larger public-private partnership, Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV), announced in 2020 by the National Institutes of Health.
Enroll Today!
Fill out the screening form to have a study team member contact you, or call 833-385-1880 to speak with a study team member.
ACTIV-6 Study – Study Website – 29 – June – 2021 – English (Master) – V2.0
Now – I want to be absolutely clear about something – which is another way of saying that I want to rub FAKE SCIENCE’S NOSE in it’s own POOP.
We are not “gaming” this study by FORCING better science on establishment science. We are making sure that this is not a “gamed” study, by REMOVING the most likely (and proven) source of gaming the study to NOT SHOW A RESULT.
If the average starting time of therapy goes DOWN to where conclusive results are shown, that is GOOD DESIGN. That’s what we’re banking on here.
So – be sure to bookmark this sucker. If you get COVID, and this study (or a successor study) is running, you want to get into it.
Well, they can lock us out of The Q Tree, but they can’t stop the truth from getting out.
Enjoy a post first over on The U Tree and now HERE.
Here is a quickie in my WAR ON REMDESIVIR.
Fellow Treeper barkerjim dropped an interesting document today, from back in July, which showed the NIH mentioning black sheep IVERMECTIN on the same page as REMDESIVIR.
Such a beautiful misdirection. These guys are MAGICIANS.
This is a perfect example of my postulate that fighting FOR ivermectin will not yield results for restoring real science as fast as fighting AGAINST remdesivir.
In fact, I would go so far as to say that the enemy realized that getting us to fight FOR the saving drug would keep us from expending our energy fighting AGAINST the murdering drug that kills us off and gives them money for doing it.
You may recall my previous posts about remdesivir.
My next piece was going to be an expansion on Karl Denninger’s recent post which places remdesivir/ivermectin and remdesivir/hydroxychloroquine in the context of Anthony Fauci and the disturbingly similar case when he was “all about AIDS” – namely, AZT/bactrim.
YES. As Cthulhu has said before, “This is not Fauci’s first rodeo.”
Before there were hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as innocent victims – good Samaritans accused falsely before the world – there was BACTRIM.
And there was FAUCI on all of them. AZT played the murderous part of remdesivir long before we forgot that “miracle drug”.
However, this new information from barkerjim’s drop right here needs to get out right away. The Q Tree site was brought down YET AGAIN as I started working on this, and again when I resumed, so I know it’s critical stuff. The ChiComs have a huge investment – both financial and military 4GW – in the American-killing drug remdesivir. They WILL protect it.
We know from doctors and scientists quoted in my first two articles, that remdesivir has a horrible track record – shocking, really – of renal toxicity. Studies of the drug against Ebola were TERMINATED because it was killing people in the hospital.
How déjà vu.
But here it comes again.
I read the same study results that the above celebratory announcement was made over. Those results were nothing to cheer about, with shot kidneys just the horrifying icing on the death cake. In my opinion, the results were far WORSE than any prior results for hydroxychloroquine. The results – to me – made HCQ look EXCELLENT in comparison.
Yes – by controlling what is acceptable science and what is not, Fauci was able to force the world to field a BAD, DANGEROUS DRUG that made money for Gilead, over a safe, mildly (but critically) effective drug, that made money only for the generics industry, and a French company.
And to top it off, Fauci USED Trump, who could do absolutely nothing about it, to take a KILLER drug into market as the ONLY way to treat his little pandemic.
So let’s take a look at that page dropped by barkerjim. I have captured it as SIX IMAGES.
As you can see by our comments on The U Tree, most people will look at this table and think they are seeing positive and reasonable behavior by NIH. Adverse events are being discussed, and it appears that things are “even-handed” between different drugs.
And that is EXACTLY the style in which EVIL ABOUNDS IN WASHINGTON, DC (or Atlanta). Good and evil are forced into compromises where GOOD LOSES and EVIL WINS – but the result is called “meeting in the middle”.
CLOSER INSPECTION of the table gives you this, under Adverse Events for remdesivir.
Nausea
ALT and AST elevations
Hypersensitivity
Increases in prothrombin time
Drug vehicle is SBECD, which has been associated with renal and liver toxicity. SBECD accumulation may occur in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment.
Each 100 mg vial of RDV lyophilized powder contains 3 g of SBECD, and each 100 mg/20 mL vial of RDV solution contains 6 g of SBECD.
Clinicians may consider preferentially using the lyophilized powder formulation (which contains less SBECD) in patients with renal impairment.
This is some of the most remarkable “medical misinformation” I’ve ever seen. It’s truly a work of art.
NIH has HIDDEN – completely hidden – the pronounced renal toxicity of remdesivir. They have hidden it COMPLETELY. It’s GONE. What you are seeing there – the talk about renal and liver toxicity – is a BLAME-SHIFT to a substance that is used WIDELY in intravenous formulations, called sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin, or SBECD for short.
This substance is an EXCIPIENT.
An excipient is a substance that is used to MIX with a drug, and take that drug into a form where it can be ADMINISTERED easily. Thus, an excipient may DISSOLVE the drug, or help to dissolve it, into a liquid form. It may help POWDER the drug, so that it can be pressed into tablets or filled into capsules.
Excipients are often considered “inactive ingredients”, even though – YES – they very much can change the effective amount of a drug that the patient gets.
If I had to describe SBECD as something, it would be as a DETERGENT FOR DRUGS. It’s a kind of SOAP made from a cyclodextrin, instead of from some kind of fat or lipid.
Cyclodextrins are rings of sugar molecules that falls somewhere in between being a smaller chain sugar (like sucrose) and a starch. Cyclodextrins have lots of uses, because they form tubes that act like waffle cones for other molecules. Febreze uses cyclodextrins to trap molecules which have unpleasant odors, at the same time that they release more pleasant ones. A genius application, quite frankly.
Thus, if you make a SOAP that has a little waffle cone for drugs, you can EASILY get drugs to dissolve into a concentrated liquid form by using that soap.
See those sidechains hanging off the cyclodextrin ring? Those are the “SBE” part of SBECD. They are typical of DETERGENTS.
This SBECD stuff and things like it are VERY useful for delivery of drugs. AND they’re relatively safe, too. They are rapidly excreted through the kidneys. Yeah, you don’t want a SOAP piling up in your blood if your kidneys are not working, and THAT is the fact that is being TWISTED by NIH when they say:
Drug vehicle is SBECD, which has been associated with renal and liver toxicity. SBECD accumulation may occur in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment.
Did you catch that sleight of hand? I’m gonna show it to you.
What exactly is causing the renal problems in the FIRST PLACE that you MAY have to be careful about, so that you don’t build up the excipient FOR IT, which MAY constitute a FURTHER risk?
REMDESIVIR.
It’s a crafty little lie. If you have good kidneys, you don’t have anything to worry about with this SBECD crap. But if you have bad kidneys, the LEAST of your problems is SBECD buildup. It’s the remdesivir IN the SBECD that’s gonna kill you.
Weakened kidneys do NOT need to be hit with remdesivir.
Which doesn’t even work ANYWAY. Except to keep people LONGER in the hospital.
Now what you SHOULD be getting, when they administer remdesivir, at the point where the VIRUS is basically gone, and you’re dealing with spike protein damage, cytokine storm, and all that nasty crap, are antiinflammatory, antithrombotic, and immunomodulatory drugs. Even HCQ (a known antirheumatic) at reasonable doses had some antiinflammatory effect in late-stage hospitalized COVID cases, although steroids and other things work better.
When the virus is basically gone, and a bunch of its CRAP is left behind, there is no point administering a toxic antiviral like remdesivir, other than to send money to Gilead Pharmaceuticals and their Deep State friends.
Now, let me stop here and validate this stuff.
HERE is a link that explains how SBECD can be filtered out of blood ANYWAY if a patient has renal impairment.
Do you see what that means? SBECD is a nothingburger. It’s a DEFLECTION.
The renal problems of remdesivir are never mentioned, by quickly bringing up the risks of the excipient due to the unmentioned damage BY remdesivir.
What NIH did here was to quickly point their finger at THE OTHER GUY and said “HE DID IT!”
This is pure politicized science, where the politics is to defend the drugs and vaccines that enable the shared profits of both the Deep State and the companies that NIH, CDC, and NIAID are in bed with.
Let’s go back to that link I just gave you. THIS part of the conclusions comports very nicely with the reality of SBECD as a widely used excipient.
The finding that SBECD can be effectively removed by CVVH is clinically important, because some cyclodextrins have been associated with hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity due to vacuolation [3]. Although our study was small, no evidence to suggest SBECD as a cause of hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity was demonstrated in our study patients. This finding is consistent with other SBECD safety studies in humans [3,18]. Additionally, animal studies have only been able to demonstrate cyclodextrin toxicities when dosages more than 50-fold greater (3,000 mg/kg) than those used in humans were administered [3,19,20]. Unlike other cyclodextrins used in these animal studies, SBECD undergoes only minimal tubular reabsorption and limits concentrations within the intracellular tissues of the kidney, potentially reducing the risk of nephrotoxicity. Nevertheless, the FDA labeling for voriconazole recommends that IV therapy be avoided, if possible, in patients with a CrCl <50 ml/min [5]. Our data suggest that IV voriconazole can be safely administered in this population if the patient is concurrently undergoing CVVH.
Delafloxacin, a fluoroquinolone, has activity against Gram-positive organisms including methicillin-resistant S aureus and fluoroquinolone-susceptible and -resistant Gram-negative organisms. The intravenous formulation of delafloxacin contains the excipient sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin (SBECD), which is eliminated by renal filtration. This study examined the pharmacokinetics and safety of SBECD after single intravenous (IV) infusions in subjects with renal impairment. The study was an open-label, parallel-group, crossover study in subjects with normal renal function or mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, and those with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis. Subjects received 300 mg delafloxacin IV or placebo IV, containing 2400 mg SBECD, in 2 periods separated by ≥14-day washouts. SBECD total clearance decreased with decreasing renal function, with a corresponding increase in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞ ). After IV delafloxacin 300 mg administration, SBECD mean total clearance was 6.28 and 1.24 L/h, mean AUC0-∞ was 387 and 2130 h·μg/mL, and mean renal clearance was 5.36 and 1.14 L/h in normal and severe renal subjects, respectively. Similar values were obtained after IV placebo administration. In subjects with end-stage renal disease, delafloxacin 300 mg IV produced mean SBECD AUC0-48 values of 2715 and 7861 h·μg/mL when dosed before and after hemodialysis, respectively. Total SBECD clearance exhibited linear relationships to estimated glomerular filtration rate and creatinine clearance. Single doses of IV delafloxacin 300 mg and IV placebo were well tolerated in all groups. In conclusion, decreasing renal function causes reduced SBECD clearance and increased exposures, but SBECD continues to exhibit a good safety and tolerability profile in IV formulations.
“In conclusion, decreasing renal function causes reduced SBECD clearance and increased exposures, but SBECD continues to exhibit a good safety and tolerability profile in IV formulations.“
Now, the above is not the only “New York Times” style trick that NIH plays here.
Let me list, without going into long-winded explanations, my additional favorites.
The table authors note that clinical drug-drug interaction studies have not been done, but nonetheless, they say “CQ or HCQ may decrease the antiviral activity of RDV; coadministration of these drugs is not recommended.1” – with a hanging reference.
For three OTHER potential drug interactions, communications from Gilead are cited as sufficiently exonerating. One is a non-competing generic steroid (dexamethasone) and the other two are patented big pharma antivirals from corporate “frenemy” Genentech. The interaction and “C-level mind-melding” between these two companies is very interesting. Look who just went from one to the other. Interesting times.
Some crafty shade is thrown at ivermectin by citing a possible adverse event risk and then retracting it, lawyer-style: “Neurological AEs have been reported when IVM has been used to treat parasitic diseases, but it is not clear whether these AEs were caused by IVM or the underlying conditions.” Meanwhile, the DEMONSTRATED risks of remdesivir are not even mentioned.
Bottom line – NIH is protecting Gilead on the toxicity of remdesivir, and they used FAKE NEWS tricks to do it. I keep telling people – science journalism is bad, and science governance is WORSE. It’s been CHINATIZED and OBAMATIZED.
“So, I think the real question in this crisis is what is there on our view of man and our world, and on the way in which we look on life, that makes us experience a lack of sensemaking. In my opinion, I think we must conclude it is something in our materialistic, mechanistic view of man and the world that leads up to radical destruction of the real social structures and social bonds and the feeling that life makes sense. If you believe that human beings are biological machines, then this implies, by definition, that life is senseless.”
Professor Mattias Desmet
Welcome back to Wolf’s Pub!
The Arizona audit report drops today. Let the fireworks begin. It feels like we’ve been trudging through a mucky swamp trying to get somewhere and we can see the shore but can’t quite get there.
It’s about Good and Evil. It’s been enormously painful to see the depth of corruption in our nation’s institutions. Very, very painful.
IT’S A SPIRITUAL PROBLEM
One question that has dogged me since the whole Great Reset was kicked off with the CCP Virus, is how can so many people be so fooled for so long when the truth is being trumpeted across the width and depth of independent media?
Well, I ran across an interview that Reiner Fullmich conducted with Belgian psychologist and professor, Mattias Desmet: The Psychology of Covid-19 (Mass Formation and Totalitarian Thinking):
This is an utterly fascinating discussion regarding how large groups of people fall willingly into totalitarianism.
Light bulbs were going off in my head as I listened to this interview. Professor Desmet says four things must be present in order to facilitate the conditions for a people to go down the road of societal madness:
These four conditions existed prior to Covid. Larry Turner writes about Professor Desmet’s interview here. He explains:
“If these four factors are present in enough members of any given society, Desmet says the society in question is at risk for the ‘crystallizing’ action of “mass formation” where large numbers of discontented, anxious, confused, and isolated people simultaneously and suddenly seize upon some single apparent threat and give it their entire attention and energy. The basic reason for this attention and energy seizure, according to Desmet, is that putting focus on a single apparent threat provides immediate and palpable relief from a constellation of the longstanding chronic pressures of social isolation, lack of sensemaking, and free-floating anxiety and discontent. This mobilization of individual attention and energy against some single perceived threat unfortunately, according to Desmet’s explanation of the phenomena, segues easily into increasingly totalitarian government behavior.
Desmet believes that this is exactly what has happened and is happening to greater or lesser degrees all over the globe in response to the COVID19 virus pandemic. He posits that – judging from measures of high and increasing drug use, increased job burnout and economic dissatisfaction, and increasing social isolation – that prior to the arrival of COVID19 a significant number of humans were extremely uncomfortable with their lives. With the arrival of the virus, however, they were able to unload their longstanding unfocused anxiety and discontent onto the ‘COVID19 crisis’, thereby obtaining a welcome and immediate release from their chronic discomforts and tensions. Desmet refers to the immediate feeling of relief felt by those previously heavily burdened with isolation, lack of sensemaking, and free-floating anxiety and discontent as a “mental intoxication”.
Larry Turner
Turner writes more about this phenomenon and Dr. Desmet’s explanation of it here.
What about those who don’t get caught up in the lies and mass formation? Desmet says:
“Usually it is only about 30% [of a population that gets] grasped in a mass phenomenon or hypnosis. An additional 35-45% usually does not want to raise a dissonant voice in the public space because they are scared of the consequences. So, usually about 70% who shut up – 30% because they are convinced by the mainstream narrative and 40% because they don’t dare to speak out. And then there is an additional 20-25-30% who does not go along with the narrative and says it in certain situations.”
Professor Mattias Desmet
Those who are immune tend to be independent thinkers. Take a bow, guys.
Very worth your time to listen in. I definitely feel smarter after listening to the interview and reading about it. 😊
HOUSE RULES
Well, since we’re a pretty durned sense-making and cohesive group here at the Qtree, it only requires a reminder of the rules of this place. Go here to review.
If you don’t feel like fitting in for the moment here, the Utree is a welcome and present aid to run to blow off some steam. It’s also our place to reconvene during various attacks on this site, the server, and the hosting company. Prayers all around to keep us all up and running.
SACROSANCT BEER?
Since today’s opener features Professor Desmet, a Belgian, I thought it appropriate to offer a nice selection of Belgian beers today. Here’s a nice article that explains the seriousness with which the Belgians feel about their beer.
According to the author, Tom Green,
“In Belgium, beer is sacrosanct. Committed to tradition, Belgian brewers make some of the world’s greatest and most timeless beer. In the thousands of local pubs spread across the small country, beer is a unifying source of pride for the Belgian people.”
Tom Green
I watched the video embedded within the article that talks about the fact that there are over 1,500 different Belgian beers, which is amazing considering the small size of Belgium. These people are serious about beer. I mean, beer-making and beer-drinking is pretty much the national past-time.
When all this Great Reset has been beaten to death, I want to go bar-hopping in Belgium.
Meanwhile, I present the iconic (in America) version of Belgian beer: Blue Moon Belgian White
I’ve always found it very palatable. Read here how Blue Moon came to be. And for astronomy buffs, the next Blue Moon will appear in our skies on Friday, August 30, 2023.
BACK TO THE AUDIT
This picture of the Canary Islands, where that volcano has been erupting is some firework, eh? Intense video images here.
It has been said, repeatedly and truly, that if the 2020 election is not fixed, then 2022 and 2024 don’t matter. The audits in all 50 states will reveal that our votes have been stolen, are being stolen, and will be stolen if election reform is not enacted.
As we have been repeatedly warned – even by the VERY ENEMIES who are attacking us (i.e., KlauSS “Hog-Jowls” SSchwab and the WEFFEN SS), there was going to be a “cyber war” this summer – obviously timed to deal with the “fall” of the FAKE ELECTION and the CHINA VIRUS.
Thus, between the CHINAZIS and the EUNAZIS, plus the BIDENAZIS and assorted American PROGZIS, to say nothing of the GLOBONAZIS, we have a bunch of people ready to attack us.
While I try not to give away too much potentially useful (to THEM) strategic information about what is going on, it has become obvious that various forces want to make life rough for the commenters on this site.
The attack on our site include attacks on our server (and service) directly, on the people who are commenting on or viewing the site, AND on the hosting company itself.
The attack on the hosting company has been particularly insidious.
If our hosting company (who I refer to as “COUGH-COUGH.com”) can be brought down, several patriot sites will fall, including one of the most important players of all, GAB.
There has been much back-and-forth in this war. Both I and our hosts have been forced to take a variety of evasive actions over the summer.
I have never, in the entire history of this site, had to be so restrictive in terms of registrations (which must now be done MANUALLY) and user features (which had to be turned off for the non-registered users), as I have in the last few months.
And yet, despite all those measures, we just experienced one of our most serious attacks yet, locking many people out of the site, and attempting some really NASTY “get the users to turn off security” attacks, so that ANY of our registered users (and especially our authors) might get spoofed.
They are desperate, and they are persistent.
Now – with ALL of that stuff going on in MY world (remember 60,000 “Russian” phony registrations?), there is now a sustained and multifaceted attack on our hosting company, trying to distract them from the coming AUDIT ATTACKS (in my opinion).
This attack on the hosting company is a threat to ALL sites hosted by them, but most of all it is a threat to the honorable name and reputation of that company. That’s how the other side works. They are DESTROYING what they cannot legislate out of existence.
Our hosts are grateful for the support and prayers of their customers, as they, even in their time of trial, are praying for us. Thus, I ask all of you, to say a quick prayer for our hosting company.
We continue to use The U Tree as a backup, and it is functioning well in that regard. Please feel free to assemble there and to CARRY ON.
Simply carrying on is perhaps the greatest thing you can do to defeat the ChiNazi menace and the WEFFEN SS. Make their attacks pointless in the end. If you attack them TWICE AS HARD for sending you to The U Tree, then you have just invalidated all their work to get you there.
Be of good cheer, live your best life, and fight your best fight. Fear not an enemy without God.
We not only have something they don’t – we wish our treasure to be theirs as well.
Friday is here and Wolf’s Pub is open! We’re doing a great business in the back of the pub with all the dangerous drugs around nowadays…HCQ, NAC, and Ivermectin. People are dying for ‘em.
Just some dark humor.
Chartreuse
ALCHEMY AND FAUCI
At the front of the pub, is our drink special for today, which comes from a centuries’ old manuscript dedicated to giving long life. I’d say there’s some alchemy going on there (see below). Considering that the plague continued to find victims centuries after the Black Death, it is no wonder that mankind was casting about for health treatments and elixirs of life.
I found this fascinating article about a popular tract that details how to treat for the plague. Honestly, Dr. Fauci would be most comfortable with dispensing their advice today, I think:
“This treatise tells you everything you need to know to avoid getting sick during the next pandemic. It opens by telling readers how to avoid catching the plague:
If an outbreak of the plague has happened again, you can take the following steps to protect yourself. Don’t take baths and don’t sweat; both will open the pores of your body and let the venomous air get in. Avoid lechery too because that also opens the pores and lets the illness in. Don’t eat much fruit unless it is sour or new. Don’t eat garlic or onions or leaks or anything that is going to get you in a heat. Drink lots of fluids: cold water is best with vinegar of barley water.”
The treatise then informs readers how the sickness enters and impacts the body:
It explains that every person has three principal parts: the heart, the liver, and the brains. Each part has a place in the body where it expels waste: the heart under the arms, the liver between the thighs, and the brain under the throat. The sickness comes into the body through the air, makes its way to the blood and attacks the heart, then the liver, then the brains. Each part of the body will attempt to expel venoms through the cleansing part, but if it can’t, those places will break out in plague boils.”
But first, let’s recap what the medical/pharma people have been up to, in memes of course:
From Kanekoa the Great
Now I ask you, who is more learned: an 18th century group of monks making an herbal elixir for long life, or Dr. Anthony Fauci, that lying fink who tells medical lies as easily as he breathes? On to the elixir, which probably has more medical expertise in every bottle than Fauci has had in four decades.
CHARTREUSE, ELIXIR OF LONG LIFE
Today’s special is Chartreuse, yet another monk-inspired liquor. The history of this famous liquor reads like a medieval mystery. It is made by Carthusian monks from a closely-guarded secret manuscript that details a very complex, almost alchemical recipe of 130 herbs. According to the official website:
“The Order of Chartreuse was more than 500 years old when, in 1605, at a Chartreuse monastery in Vauvert, a small suburb of Paris, the monks received a gift from Duc Francois Hannibal d’ Estrées, Marshal of King’s Henri IV artillery : an already ancient manuscript from an “Elixir” soon to be nicknamed “Elixir of Long Life”. This manuscript was probably the work of a 16th century alchemist with a great knowledge of herbs and with the skill to blend, infuse, macerate the 130 of them to form a perfect balanced tonic. In the early 17th century, only a few monks and even fewer apothecaries understood the use of herbs and plants in the treatment of illness. The manuscript’s recipe was so complex that only bits and pieces of it were understood and used at Vauvert.”
The classic Chartreuse gets its unique green color from the chlorophyll in the herbs. The video below has the history as told by two representatives involved with sales of Chartreuse.
Here’s another shorter video review of Chartreuse, which because of its alcohol content soon became more than a medicinal. The original Chartreuse was 69% ABV. Today it is 55% ABV.
There’s a plethora of cocktails that include Chartreuse, but if you enjoy the pungent complexity of herbs, with honey tones, you will enjoy this special liquor straight up or on ice. I hadn’t tasted Chartreuse in decades, so I indulged in purchasing some the other day. Wow, I’ve been missing out.
Today, there are only two monks at a time who know how to create Chartreuse. They must travel in separate cars when they go to work.
THEY ARE TRYING TO KILL US
The Conservative Treehouse details in two articles, here and here, how the federal government has overtaken dispensing life-saving monoclonal antibodies in ways that punish states with lower vaccination rates.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is having none of it.
“Florida Governor Ron DeSantis responded directly to the White House effort to kill Florida residents by withholding previously agreed shipments of Monoclonal Antibodies.
During a press conference earlier today, Governor DeSantis outlined the issues Florida is facing after the Biden administration instructed the federal offices of HHS to punish the successful therapy and recovery efforts of the sunshine state healthcare system. DeSantis outlines the purchase agreement that Biden intentionally violated and also the issues created by the federal government now blocking direct purchasing of treatment from the manufacturer.”
HOUSE RULES
There’s so much evidence of medical malpractice and outright murder of patients that it is destroying the medical establishment for a generation. The ideological rot has destroyed any conscience they might have had. The LOVE OF MONEY is the root of ALL evil.
I bet they won’t be enjoying their filthy bonuses much in the future.
But here at the Qtree, we are a community of individuals who think life is precious and worth saving, and I have to tell you, I am so proud to be among y’all. I just love all of you. You’ve made these “interesting times” bearable.
If you’re new here, a review of the House Rules will give you an idea of why we stick together through thick and thin, through squabbles and disagreements. Wolfmoon has provided the Utree for us in case someone needs to duke it out, but mostly it’s a great place to reconvene if/when needed. It’s proven indispensable.
OUR ENEMY, BIG GOV CORPORATE MEDIA
NPR got caught with their pants down telling more lies about hospital bed availability in southern states. It’s beyond ridiculous at this point.
“Though the Washington Post quoted a hospital spokesperson as saying such situations were an “ongoing problem” in Alabama hospitals, not one person from the hospital confirmed the daughter’s story about the supposed capacity issues at the 43 ICUs. It wasn’t confirmed for the NPR report nor the WaPo report.
At the very least here, NPR deceived readers by making them believe two things, the first one being that DeMonia was never admitted to the Cullman hospital (false) and the second one being that the hospital couldn’t admit him due to being overwhelmed with COVID patients (also false). The Washington Post earns no brownie points for their story, either, which wasn’t much better.
And to this day, no one in any official capacity will confirm the 43 ICUs claim.”
ODDS AND ENDS
I really don’t know what to think about the Sussman indictment. I’ve gotten so cynical that I’m gonna let some time go by and events unfold before I get all giddy. Articles about it here and here and here.
Corey’s Digs with COVID RESOURCES. Excellent. Pass around to everyone.
I have been a poor and rotten servant of the Lord during my too long and too miserable life. I have made innocent women cry. I have led others astray. I have turned away from those in need in their time of need, and I have lied to myself and to God about why I did it.
But if I can save ONE person from pharmaceutical genocide, then I pray that person or a family member will put in a good word for me, and perhaps this sorry carcass of a believer can be given one more chance.
With that said, I begin doing the only thing I have ever been ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN was of some value to my fellow humans.
I will use REMDESIVIR to knock out the artillery that is pounding the only drugs saving people from the China Virus – IVERMECTIN and HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE.
It’s THAT much of a no-brainer.
It’s just hidden behind the media’s and the Biden administration’s smoke and mirrors.
The early success from hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin (HCQ + AZT) was dead easy to see in Didier Raoult’s initial communication. I could not “unsee” that success. This is how I knew that Fauci was either incompetent or a liar. I’ve explained it many times, but not today. I’m going to save your brain cells for the KILLER SHOT.
We can skip all that crap, and just let me show you TWO GRAPHS that prove hydroxychloroquine actually works.
See that jump in deaths? The one that falls back to the baseline of the graph? That is where a FAKE PAPER known as “the Lancetgate paper”, attacking hydroxychloroquine with phony data, was published to stop the use of HCQ in several countries, including Switzerland. The problem is that the Swiss are not stupid, and when they saw that withholding HCQ increased deaths, they simply reversed course.
It shows up in the data like a sore thumb. I call it “the Lancetgate effect”.
If you’re more of a graph-reader, then you may get something out of the next one.
France is the top graph. There are a LOT more deaths. This is because a communist bureaucrat married to some top politician sneakily BANNED hydroxychloroquine right before the pandemic hit
Here you can see how the data in Switzerland immediately jumped up to French levels with the Lancetgate effect. The general decline in France you see in the middle was due to the work of Didier Raoult, whose work with HCQ+AZT was gaining prominence, slowly, from the South of France, in Marseilles, but whose efforts suffered a momentary but delayed setback from Lancetgate, visible late in the Swiss increase.
Isn’t it wonderful how graphs can reflect what’s actually happening in science? Even in POLITICIZED science. This is why keeping commie mitts off the data is so important.
This was just the beginning. More and more data showed that HCQ worked, not perfectly, by any means, but pretty well, especially if given early.
Even more importantly, when the data didn’t support HCQ, community examination of the work invariably showed that there was NASTY, TRICKY, BIASED SCIENCE by those running the studies.
That was the big shocker for me. Some of the things they did to undercut hydroxychloroquine were downright VICIOUS. Almost MURDER. Not even human. Just KILLING PEOPLE to stop the drug. They literally overdosed people on their last legs with HCQ (which is actually hard to do), to try to undermine the drug.
And THAT will prepare you for what you are about to see.
What you are about to see is almost unbelievable.
I want to thank fellow QTreeper jamcooker and her dear daughter for bringing this video about the HORRORS of remdesivir to my attention.
I was not aware that many people were either as knowledgeable or more knowledgeable than I was, about how HORRIBLE a drug remdesivir really is.
The trouble is, I was lazy. I kept TELLING people remdesivir was bad, but I never went so far as to make speeches, or put together a video, or do ANY of the things that a REAL hero would do.
Nope. I was a lazy piece of shit.
I didn’t even do a dedicated blog post – when I KNEW it was killing people. Sure, I mentioned it a few times, but I never really committed.
But hey – I can do a blog post now. It’s not that hard.
So let’s just take a look at this video, and then I’ll fill you in with even more.
All the stuff I should have told you earlier.
Here is the LINK, so that you can send the video to other people.
All his talk about the kidney damage from remdesivir?
THAT is stuff that I knew. Let me explain that.
Remember THIS moment?
This was AFTER Fauci and the media went after HCQ, and after Trump for any mention of HCQ.
So when Fauci said remdesivir was the “gold standard of care”, I went and looked at the data.
The COMMENTS from other scientists said EXACTLY what I was seeing.
It was CRAP. There is NO WAY remdesivir was anywhere NEAR as good as HCQ. And HCQ wasn’t all THAT great. HCQ saved people from hospitalization and death, but it’s not like it cured the disease overnight.
I repeat. Remdesivir was CRAP. It was EMBARRASSING that Trump had to shill this stuff, just to keep our hopes up, because FAUCI was standing up for the INDUSTRY and NOT THE PEOPLE.
Some of why remdesivir wasn’t working, was because the drug was being administered too late, when there is very little virus to kill, and all the damage has been done. It’s like shooting a vary expensive GUN at the sound of a burglar’s car going over the horizon. It’s WORTHLESS.
But the data I saw was far worse than simply not working. As one commenter said, the only thing remdesivir seemed to be really good at, was making people need kidney transplants.
Trust me. HCQ at normal doses NEVER hurts people’s kidneys. Doesn’t even HURT ’em, much less destroy them.
Think about that.
THIS? The KIDNEY KILLER? Is the “GOLD STANDARD OF CARE”?
GIVE ME A BREAK.
No, it’s the OPPOSITE.
It was CLEAR to me at the time, that Fauci was a freaking LIAR.
Trump, Fauci Cheer Gilead’s Drug Results in Coronavirus Fight
Dr. Anthony Fauci makes remarks as President Donald Trump and Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards looks on in the Oval Office on Wednesday. (Doug Mills/Getty Images)
By Newsmax Wires | Wednesday, 29 April 2020 12:53 PM
President Donald Trump hailed good news that a Gilead Sciences Inc. experimental antiviral drug might help fight the coronavirus, and infectious disease official Anthony Fauci said data shows it appears to help patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
Fauci said the early results of a closely watched clinical trial offered “quite good news” regarding a potential therapy made by the biotechnology company Gilead Sciences Inc.
“The data shows that remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery,” Fauci said.
An experimental drug for the coronavirus has a proven benefit, according to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
“The data shows that remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery,” Fauci said.
Just listen to the conclusions of these researchers. Remdesivir is USELESS – except to make MONEY by keeping people in the hospital LONGER. I mean, getting a new kidney might take a little bit of time. Ya know?
Conclusions and Relevance
In this cohort study of US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir treatment was not associated with improved survival but was associated with longer hospital stays. Routine use of remdesivir may be associated with increased use of hospital beds while not being associated with improvements in survival.
In any SANE world, they would not be administering this crap remdesivir ANY MORE to ANYONE.
It’s ESPECIALLY important to note that Fauci’s LIE about remdesivir diminishing time to recovery is DIRECTLY CONTRADICTED by the MAIN CONCLUSION of this study.
A study on veterans who did not DESERVE to be treated as they were by Tony Fauci.
Now – let’s end this on a PERSONAL note.
Remember that “overpass patriot lady” who they REFUSED to give ivermectin?
They KILLED HER with remdesivir.
And the only way that they can KILL old Trump supporters LEGALLY – while making MONEY on our dead bodies – is this way. Part of that is making sure we can’t get the alternatives.
Ivermectin LITERALLY SAVED INDIA and Fauci says there is no proof it works. When India was having a massive Delta outbreak, the Media LOVED to talk about India, India, India.
But now that Ivermectin has WIPED OUT COVID in India, the Media doesn’t want to talk about India.
Bill’s not wrong about that. There is a GREAT article on Gateway Pundit, about what happened in India with ivermectin. Their keystone province of Uttar Pradesh has been LIBERATED by ivermectin.
Look at the data in the article. The title on GP is a bit misleading – the disease isn’t GONE like smallpox, but DAMN – the numbers are IMPRESSIVE.
Now it’s time to be very realistic. They do NOT give up.
They BEAT hydroxychloroquine into the GROUND with the media.
They did it to hydroxychloroquine before – they’re doing it to ivermectin right now.
Here is an EXCELLENT summary of how Fauci KNEW that hydroxychloroquine worked, and all the while he pushed the murderous moneymaker remdesivir. Do click the link below. This has a GREAT summary of Lancetgate, and links to many relevant reviews of what happened.
In MY opinion, we cannot stop these horrible monsters by simply defending the good but imperfect treatments.
In MY opinion, we need to SLICE OPEN REMDESIVIR and SPILL BLOOD INTO THE WATER to bring in the DEMOCRAT TRIAL ATTORNEYS.
And the SOONER we do this, and the SOONER we THREATEN HOSPITALS into giving the TRULY SAFER DRUGS – not because they want to, but to keep from hemorrhaging their profits, then the SOONER we end this madness.
The BEST DEFENSE is a REAL OFFENSE.
Make them PAY for KILLING SENIORS with REMDESIVIR.
We knew it was a snake when we let it in. Now, we all have to kick it out.
In which I argue that WE are the new cell culture for an uncontrolled gain of function experiment, that only WE can end.
It took me a while to figure out WHY they insisted on using the FULL SPIKE PROTEIN for these damn vaccines. This question has bugged me from the very beginning, and it got worse and worse as more and more spike protein side effects piled up.
Thankfully, sleeping late on the morning of 9/12/ 21, I had a DREAM which finally helped me see the answer.
It wasn’t exactly Kekulé’s dream, but it served the same purpose – to accept what I had not yet been able to fully see and accept.
Now, normally I would not mention that ANY of this came from a dream. There is no faster way to lose credibility, than to say “it came from a dream” – other than saying the answer came from the voice of God. But the truth of the matter is that I often find that UNRESOLVED QUESTIONS form what might be called “motifs” in my dreams, and sometimes I actually get some kind of resolution FROM the dreams.
If I tried to explain the dream itself, it would be almost meaningless to you. Things shift and change in dreams. Stone becomes brick becomes concrete and then vanishes. Stairs appear and disappear. People are there and people are gone, to be replaced by different people. One location changes smoothly into another location.
All of THAT is a jumble. This dream was a real doozy, too. Crazy! But in the dream I kept trying to resolve something – actually TWO things – which were composed of collections of ideas. These two things were like little, linear, diagrammatic collections of jewelry boxes, and it was impossible for me to SAY anything useful about the two collections, and how they related to each other, without actually interacting with them and looking into the jewelry boxes in some fashion or another, and in doing so, the collections were no longer separated and isolated from what might be called “everything else”.
It was IMPOSSIBLE for me, in the dream, to separate these things from “everything else”, if I wanted to know anything about their reality.
When I woke up, I realized the point of the dream.
The point of the dream was that the two things – IN REALITY – were both connected not only to each other, but to everything else. The point of the dream was that I needed to look at how the two things EACH interacted with everything else, to see how they were TRULY related to each other.
Not how they were SUPPOSED to be related to each other, but how they are ACTUALLY related to each other.
And THEN – in the “generality” of that moment – I realized that this “model”, if you will, applied to the COVID-19 VIRUSES (one collection) and the mRNA VACCINES (the second collection). And in THAT moment, I stopped looking at them as ANTAGONISTIC things, just because a LIAR named Fauci says they are antagonistic, but instead as SIMILAR and COMPLEMENTARY things.
As genetic material.
THAT is when “IT” hit me.
I woke up fully, and realized the following.
The VIRUSES and the VACCINES are DESIGNED to interact with each other in the realm of “everything else”, that being us humans. They are NOT designed to interact in the way we are being told. They are designed to interact in the way that they ACTUALLY DO interact.
Let me give you a simple representation of this relationship.
Consider a square. Color the top side GREEN – that represents “everything else”, not as it “should” be, but as it REALLY IS. Every point on that line segment is part of the world, relating to other points in the ways that they REALLY DO, in a “green” way. It’s ALL GREEN.
Now make the bottom two CORNER POINTS the two collections. Connect those points to the top of the square by green lines – the left and right sides of the square. Again, this is how they REALLY connect.
We are being TOLD that the bottom side of the square is RED.
Why should we believe that? What if it’s NOT red? What if it’s GREEN? What if there is a simpler GREEN ANSWER?
And IMMEDIATELY I knew what the GREEN ANSWER WAS.
The mRNA “vaccines” encoding a spike protein are designed to do in HUMANS containing the virus exactly the same thing that similarly added spike protein mRNA does in CELL CULTURES containing the virus. They are designed to CHANGE THE VIRUS – to make it GAIN FUNCTION. ALL that is needed to create the new virus is an otherwise identical injection with a NEW CODE that GAINS FUNCTION.
In other words, genetic vaccines offer an opportunity to smoothly regulate the rate and direction of evolution of the virus, without humanity knowing it. And they do it IN THE ANIMAL HOST INTENDED.
This solved many mysteries, which I will explain shortly.
This told me that there is ZERO need to go off and create a new variant in a lab. All one has to do is to change the code of the vaccine mRNA, and PRESTO – a new variant is introduced “in the wild”, with almost no chance of getting caught.
At this point, many of you are doing a WTF, so let me back up and explain this again.
What science does to “create a new virus” in the laboratory, from RNA or DNA, is to “somehow” (COUGH, COUGH, COUGH) get the RNA or DNA that they want to get into the NEW VIRUS, into laboratory cell cultures that are making OLD VIRUS. They need to get it into the cells, pretty much like they get the vaccine mRNA into our cells, using nanotech or virus vectors. THEN, the “old virus process” slips the “new genetic instructions” into the old protein shell, but as the virus spreads and multiplies, IF there is any “gain of function”, then the NEW INSTRUCTIONS in the NEW protein shell will WIN, and the result will be THE NEW VIRUS with GAIN OF FUNCTION.
Nobody really wants to spell out all the details of gain of function techniques in public, just like they don’t want to give the directions of how to make high explosives to terrorists. But THAT KNOWLEDGE IS OUT THERE, and we know roughly HOW THEY DO IT.
Honestly, it’s a bit like plant grafting, only instead of being largely in the Z DIRECTION (up), it’s in the T DIRECTION (time). You GRAFT new instructions into an old virus, until the new virus TAKES.
What they have done here is to create a PLATFORM for genetic change. Eventually it will be used to change US, but for the moment, they are clearly using it to CHANGE THE VIRUS (which is used to help change us, albeit somewhat indirectly).
Now – I said that this solved many mysteries. I’m going to list them here.
Why the full spike protein in the vaccines, despite its toxicity, and the greater likely safety of vaccines based on smaller subunits like the RBD?
Because the full spike is the main part of the virus that they’ve been changing, and which “gains function”. To get a new virus with a new spike, you have to change the instructions for the spike that get encoded in the virus. Also because you want to include the genetic instructions for ONE OR MORE FULL PIECES of the virus, if not the entire virus. That depends on exactly how the virus builds. We know (the Jaenisch paper) that the virus uploads fragments of its own RNA into the genomic DNA of the host, which come back out and are transcribed to RNA, so it will presumably do the same to pieces of the vaccine when both are present. Viruses that build from the vaccine spike variants will tend to WIN if they have gained function.
Why mRNA vaccines, despite the obvious safety advantages of protein vaccines?
Because protein is GENETICALLY SAFE – and that is NOT what they want. If the human population is now the experimental platform for virus gain-of-function experimentation, then only by being able to inject us with mRNA or DNA will viruses be able to be swiftly and decisively modified IN VIVO.
Short answer – they are not trying to change OUR genes yet – but they ARE trying to change viruses IN US. In vivo. And not in a way for our own good.
Why did they fight so hard against short-protein subunit vaccines like those from Winfried Stöcker and Sorrento?
Because if those vaccines are clearly superior to genetic vaccines due to safety or efficacy, then the conspirators will LOSE THEIR PLATFORM for genetic modification of viruses IN VIVO in the human population. Thus, these likely safer subunit and PROTEIN vaccines encountered delay after delay, and roadblock after roadblock, and in the case of the Stöcker vaccine, threats of arrest and legal trouble.
Why is Ralph Baric now doing work on chimeric mRNA vaccines that include LONGER mRNA encoding MULTIPLE proteins from SARS-CoV-2?
Because this approach toward longer and more mRNA leads closer to what they need to do – to inject us with the complete instructions for modified viruses – basically as what are called “virus-like particles” (VLPs), or by using viral vectors. These are “Fauci-compliant” in that they are “all about more and more antibodies”, and thus follow Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis” act, but clearly they will have more and more side effects, possibly including ADE.
As you can see, the vaccines are “less and less about natural immunity”, less and less about individual health, and more and more about experimentation and sociobiological engineering.
What does this have to do with Judy Mikovits?
Judy is one of the few people who have honestly explained the GAMES that the Faucists are playing with gain of function.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B17QQTr6xY
She explained that what these people have done – in complete violation of the CONTROLS that were placed on genetic engineering back in the 1970s – is to FORCE VIRUSES to “take” in human cells, allegedly in order to “see if they can or cannot take in human cells”. They are basically saying “we have to try hard to change the liquid to make the liquid catch fire, to see if it’s flammable”. This is a special kind of dishonesty.
There are MANY ways to make a virus “gain function”, but one of the FIRST and SIMPLEST is to just use tricks to make it change enough on its own, to eventually “take” in human cell culture.
It’s a lot like Nancy Pelosi and Obamacare – “you have to pass it to see what’s in it”. That is a special kind of cynical dishonesty, IMO.
But NOW they have actually HIDDEN gain of function research in PLAIN SIGHT. In us. Thanks to genetic vaccines.
Why did Adam Schiff go after Natural News and get them deplatformed?
Because the greatest danger to their plan is that humans will reject the future of human genetic modification IN VIVO. Natural News and their movement are a focal point of organized opposition. The Democrats KNEW this was coming, and they wanted the opposition out of the way.
This is also why so much work goes into discrediting these people.
But if the vaccine is for the SAME spike protein as in the virus, then how is THAT gain of function?
It’s NOT. It is ONLY if the vaccine contains DIFFERENT genetic material, DIFFERENT instructions, that any possibility for CHANGING the virus ensues.
Now tell me how you are going to go into EVERY vaccine that is given ANYWHERE in the world, and make sure that the mRNA doesn’t encode a new variant?
You can’t. That’s the evil genius of this plot.
If I want to introduce a variant ANYWHERE, all I have to do is give out a vaccine at the target location, where my vaccine looks just like the official stuff – or maybe even IS official stuff – but mine contains whatever genetic data is needed for a new virus, inside the same old nanotechnology.
You see – WE. HUMANS. OURSELVES. ARE. NOW. THE. GAIN-OF-FUNCTION. PLATFORM.
Pretty slick, if you ask me.
Could this platform be used for ADE as an intended effect?
Yes – because the variant that challenges prior antibodies is controlled by whoever launches the variant – and if that person or group is the same one controlling the vaccines, then TOUGH LUCK. And the ADE could be pinpointed in space and time, pretty much like Stalin’s Holmodor against the middle class in Ukraine. This platform of viral control can be used to control people at the individual, family, local, regional, state, national, continental, and global levels.
If we stop using these vaccines, will the variants stop?
They might stop. It will become much harder for the variants to appear, whether they are natural, and arise from vaccine evolutionary pressure, or are man-made, and require the vaccines for delivery.
Some of the best early opinions, IMO, thought that the initial genetic drift of SARS-CoV-2 was sufficiently small, that a single vaccination would cover all likely variants. While I’m not highly confident in that thought any more, I think it indicates that drift would be small, were it not for the vaccine.
So which is the plot – the virus or the vaccine?
AND logic – it’s BOTH OF THEM – the message of the dream. And it’s BOTH OF THEM in the SAME context that it would be in HUMAN CELLS. We are just “human cells on the hoof”.
The virus is out – and now they can change it “in the wild” thanks to GENETIC VACCINES – the greatest cover for genetic experimentation on viruses and humans that was ever conceived.
So how do we stop this plot?
Easy. We utterly reject genetic vaccines as a RISKY PLATFORM FOR TREATING VIRAL DISEASE, because they can be used to manipulate the disease and the diseased. The risks are not just individual – they are SOCIETAL as well. So we make them highly illegal. To get there, we use CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE FIRST. We REFUSE genetic vaccines.
For those who want vaccines, we go to old-school, time-tested, PLOT-SCUTTLING, protein vaccines. And all VOLUNTARY.
We don’t call this a RELIGIOUS objection. We are honest and call it a MORAL OBJECTION. If, however, your CHURCH OR SYNAGOGUE takes up the sword of abolition, and adheres to the morality of rejecting genetic vaccines, e.g., as considering them a form of “tempting the devil”, then you CAN validly call it a religious objection, too.
However, as an ETHICAL objection, like the objection to SLAVERY, all humans can take part.
Make no mistake – we are now in a literal HUMAN GAIN OF FUNCTION EXPERIMENT, using the whole human population as test subjects, and genetic vaccines as the obvious GOF vector.
The only way to STOP THE EXPERIMENT COLD, is to STOP USING GENETIC VACCINES.
Simple. Don’t let the snake in. Or if you HAVE let it in, kick it out!!!
