“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.” –J. Robert Oppenheimer
This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread is VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).
Yes, it’s Monday…again.
But it’s okay! We’ll get through it.
Free Speech is practiced here at the Q Tree. But please keep it civil. We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.
If you find yourself in a slap fight, we ask that you take it outside to The U Tree…which is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here.
Please also consider the Important Guidelines, outlined here. Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.
Please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election:
For your listening enjoyment, I offer ‘Carol of the Bells’ performed by Libera:
And this Epic Version, by Samuel Kim Music:
Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.
It sucks and there are new outrages each day in this horror show of epic phuckery.
We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.
Joe Biden didn’t win.
I will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.
Wheatie’s Word of the Day:
tosh
Tosh is a noun which means…foolish nonsense; drivel; rubbish; malarky.
Used in a sentence:
It’s ironic that Joe Biden ran as the “no malarky” candidate since the unmitigated, senseless tosh that spews from his mouth is undecipherable.
Watch carefully, because you will RARELY see angry, vicious, red diaper communist hoaxing exposed as CLEARLY and DEEPLY as it has been with Jussie Smollett.
Here is the New York Post, calling it like it is. Well, almost.
Don’t assume that the “to boost career” stuff is actually true. That is a RATIONALIZATION. In my opinion, our desire to EXCUSE a malicious race hoax to the less heinous crime of “personal gain” is a psychological gimme to Jussie Smollett – a kind of peace offering – but in reality it is a form of DENIAL.
The communists will GLADLY allow you to cover up THEIR crimes with YOUR self-deception.
We want to deny the VICIOUSNESS of black race hoaxing, but it is every bit as evil as the classic mirror opposite – the psychologically depraved white woman who falsely accuses a black man of rape. Both crimes are detestable in the extreme, and deserve punishment that sets an example.
“DON’T DO THIS. EVER.”
Social/political hoaxing is not, at its core, a “Black” thing. It is a COMMUNIST thing. And it is NOT Jussie Smollett’s “Black” roots that are actually behind what is going on. It’s his BOLSHEVIK roots, way back in Russia and Eastern Europe, that set the course of Jussie Smollett’s life.
Jussie Smollett, like his entire family of media-ready lib-sibs, is a PBS DUMPSTER FIRE out of the Soviet Union, pushed into America almost a century ago and STILL causing Stalinist destruction.
It’s time to take a closer look at what is REALLY going on with Jussie Smollett.
START HERE, with a wonderful editorial by the New York Post, fully engaged in the CRT wars, and understanding that Jussie Smollett / Cory Booker / Kamala Harris HOAXING, CRT / SEL race-mongering, Soros DAs and AGs putting criminals back on the streets, and BLM / ANTIFA / RevCom violence are all part of the same cycle of destructive race-grifting which keeps communism fed what it needs – people as human tinder, and which in reality keeps black America “down on the farm” by the most insidious form of oppression, namely by SELF-OPPRESSION.
This is communism sticking to a story for political ends. Jussie Smollett caught “red-handed” means nothing to them.
This is EXACTLY like “Mumia” – the guilty-as-hell cop-killer who everybody knows is FACTUALLY guilty, but who the left always proclaims innocent by a kind of “group lie”, which pretends that evidence simply doesn’t exist – and that extends all the way to election theft, here in 2020 and beyond.
So who exactly IS Jussie Smollett?
Jussie Smollett comes from a family of Soviet social activists who came to North America and proceeded to ply their communist trade from one generation to the next. The Smolletts were ALWAYS never more than a step away from the MEDIA and HOLLYWOOD.
If you follow the family, you will see that Smollett kids were RAISED to be media manipulators.
As you will see, Jussie’s entire lineage is connected to TOP leftist radicals for DECADES.
These are NOT ordinary people.
FTA:
It’s clear just from what little we can find here that:
Jussie’s mother was connected to TOP black radicals and powerful politicians
Jussie’s father was connected to Hollywood from before the kids were born, and used those connections to get the kids into media and programming from early on
There is much confusion about “junior and senior” on Jussie’s father Joel, and I find this typical of diaper families, where obscurity by confusion is used to pass off immigrant communist background as “ordinary”.
But let’s take that bit of information about his father PETER SMOLLETT and see where that leads:
Peter Smollett February 26, 1930-February 19, 2017
Peter Smollett died on February 19, 2017 in Toronto, a week before his 87th birthday.
Peter was born on February 26, 1930 in Brooklyn, N.Y., and grew up in Far Rockaway, N.Y. He was the son of David Smollett and Dawley Smollett (née Levy), both from Eastern European Jewish immigrant families.
At 19 years old, in New York City, he apprenticed as a film editor. He continued work in the New York film industry during the 1950’s and early 1960’s, interrupted by some years working in Pennsylvania as an industrial worker and union organizer. During that period, he was married to Molly Smollett (née Hirschenson), and had two sons, Jeff and Joel.
In 1966, in New York, he married Eleanor Wenkart Smollett, a cultural anthropologist. They moved to Regina, Saskatchewan, where both went to work at the University of Regina. There they raised their daughter Rebecca.
For nearly two decades at the University of Regina, Peter taught innovative courses on the politics of the mass media, especially film, and on the evolution of the role of artists in society.
In the 1990’s, Peter and Eleanor retired to Toronto. There they welcomed a son-in-law and two grandchildren into their lives.
Peter was a lifelong radical, a trade unionist, civil rights activist, self-educated person, reader and polemicist.
Peter leaves his immediate family in Toronto: his wife, Eleanor Wenkart Smollett, and his daughter, Rebecca Smollett, son-in-law David Ley, and their children, Abraham Ley and Yohanna Ley. As well, he is survived by his son from his first marriage, Jeff Smollett; the six adult children of his late son, Joel Smollett, and their children; his sister, Norma Goldwyn, nephew, Craig Goldwyn with wife Lou, and niece Ann Goldwyn with husband Peter.
To Plant Memorial Trees in memory, please visit our Sympathy Store.Published in Leader-Post on Mar. 11, 2017.
One of the BEST validations of what this all means is a comment on the obituary.
March 11, 2017
Peter had a huge influence on me when he was my film professor in Regina. His politics were progressive and his filmmaking and teaching skills impressive. I credit Peter with teaching me enough that I was able to fake my way through a career as a television journalist. My condolences to Eleanor and the crest of Peter’s family.
Norm Bolen
There you have it – right there.
The Smollett family record is one of crypto-communist activism in America – STARTING with the immigration of Jussie’s great-grand-parents. Not only is Jussie double-diaper from BOTH parents – he’s got so much diaper on his father’s side, he could start a laundry service.
Don’t let these communists off the hook. This isn’t some “prank”, as Soros DA Kim Foxx tried to make it out to be.
NO – this is CLASSIC Alinsky hoaxing. It’s malicious, it’s anti-American, and it supports FOREIGN objectives on American soil.
My advice? Throw the BOOK at this familial communist creep.
And then find out what Kamala Harris knew, what Cory Booker knew, WHEN they knew it, and whether they are the ones who initiated the plot.
Look for burner phones used by aides. Remember Kamala’s “fake cops”? Yes – she’s perfectly capable of being part of a hoax.
Sundance has a great article up right now, in which he shows why his warning about Western COVID authoritarianism is coming true, by highlighting a speech by Vladimir Putin.
Let me back up a bit.
Sundance has been saying that the increasing authoritarianism and brutality of the Western “democracies” over COVID mandates, is placing those countries (including the USA) in the dangerous position of giving real credibility to human rights criticisms by Russia, China and Iran.
He has ALSO been saying that this unearned credibility has significant geopolitical consequence.
Sundance has WARNED, that as Western criticisms of Russia and China grow more hypocritical, those same Western countries will NOT be able to object, much less react, to aggressive moves by Russia and China.
I urge you to go read Sundance’s thoughts – UNTIL you get to the translated transcript of Vladimir Putin’s amazing speech. Sundance only provides the most highly relevant part of the speech.
I want you to come back here, and read THE WHOLE DAMN SPEECH.
I will save my thoughts for the end. It’s much more profitable if you read his speech yourselves, and come to the same conclusions independently, which I am sure you will.
President of Russia Vladimir Putin:
Ladies and gentlemen,
To begin with, I would like to thank you for coming to Russia and taking part in the Valdai Club events.
As always, during these meetings you raise pressing issues and hold comprehensive discussions of these issues that, without exaggeration, matter for people around the world. Once again, the key theme of the forum was put in a straightforward, I would even say, point-blank manner: Global Shake-up in the 21st Century: The Individual, Values and the State.
Indeed, we are living in an era of great change. If I may, by tradition, I will offer my views with regard to the agenda that you have come up with.
In general, this phrase, “to live in an era of great change,” may seem trite since we use it so often. Also, this era of change began quite a long time ago, and changes have become part of everyday life. Hence, the question: are they worth focusing on? I agree with those who made the agenda for these meetings; of course they are.
In recent decades, many people have cited a Chinese proverb. The Chinese people are wise, and they have many thinkers and valuable thoughts that we can still use today. One of them, as you may know, says, “God forbid living in a time of change.” But we are already living in it, whether we like it or not, and these changes are becoming deeper and more fundamental. But let us consider another Chinese wisdom: the word “crisis” consists of two hieroglyphs – there are probably representatives of the People’s Republic of China in the audience, and they will correct me if I have it wrong – but, two hieroglyphs, “danger” and “opportunity.” And as we say here in Russia, “fight difficulties with your mind, and fight dangers with your experience.”
Of course, we must be aware of the danger and be ready to counter it, and not just one threat but many diverse threats that can arise in this era of change. However, it is no less important to recall a second component of the crisis – opportunities that must not be missed, all the more so since the crisis we are facing is conceptual and even civilisation-related. This is basically a crisis of approaches and principles that determine the very existence of humans on Earth, but we will have to seriously revise them in any event. The question is where to move, what to give up, what to revise or adjust. In saying this, I am convinced that it is necessary to fight for real values, upholding them in every way.
Humanity entered into a new era about three decades ago when the main conditions were created for ending military-political and ideological confrontation. I am sure you have talked a lot about this in this discussion club. Our Foreign Minister also talked about it, but nevertheless I would like to repeat several things.
A search for a new balance, sustainable relations in the social, political, economic, cultural and military areas and support for the world system was launched at that time. We were looking for this support but must say that we did not find it, at least so far. Meanwhile, those who felt like the winners after the end of the Cold War (we have also spoken about this many times) and thought they climbed Mount Olympus soon discovered that the ground was falling away underneath even there, and this time it was their turn, and nobody could “stop this fleeting moment” no matter how fair it seemed.
In general, it must have seemed that we adjusted to this continuous inconstancy, unpredictability and permanent state of transition, but this did not happen either.
I would like to add that the transformation that we are seeing and are part of is of a different calibre than the changes that repeatedly occurred in human history, at least those we know about. This is not simply a shift in the balance of forces or scientific and technological breakthroughs, though both are also taking place. Today, we are facing systemic changes in all directions – from the increasingly complicated geophysical condition of our planet to a more paradoxical interpretation of what a human is and what the reasons for his existence are.
Let us look around. And I will say this again: I will allow myself to express a few thoughts that I sign on to.
Firstly, climate change and environmental degradation are so obvious that even the most careless people can no longer dismiss them. One can continue to engage in scientific debates about the mechanisms behind the ongoing processes, but it is impossible to deny that these processes are getting worse, and something needs to be done. Natural disasters such as droughts, floods, hurricanes, and tsunamis have almost become the new normal, and we are getting used to them. Suffice it to recall the devastating, tragic floods in Europe last summer, the fires in Siberia – there are a lot of examples. Not only in Siberia – our neighbours in Turkey have also had wildfires, and the United States, and other places on the American continent. It sometimes seems that any geopolitical, scientific and technical, or ideological rivalry becomes pointless in this context, if the winners will have not enough air to breathe or nothing to drink.
The coronavirus pandemic has become another reminder of how fragile our community is, how vulnerable it is, and our most important task is to ensure humanity a safe existence and resilience. To increase our chance of survival in the face of cataclysms, we absolutely need to rethink how we go about our lives, how we run our households, how cities develop or how they should develop; we need to reconsider economic development priorities of entire states. I repeat, safety is one of our main imperatives, in any case it has become obvious now, and anyone who tries to deny this will have to later explain why they were wrong and why they were unprepared for the crises and shocks whole nations are facing.
Second. The socioeconomic problems facing humankind have worsened to the point where, in the past, they would trigger worldwide shocks, such as world wars or bloody social cataclysms. Everyone is saying that the current model of capitalism which underlies the social structure in the overwhelming majority of countries, has run its course and no longer offers a solution to a host of increasingly tangled differences.
Everywhere, even in the richest countries and regions, the uneven distribution of material wealth has exacerbated inequality, primarily, inequality of opportunities both within individual societies and at the international level. I mentioned this formidable challenge in my remarks at the Davos Forum earlier this year. No doubt, these problems threaten us with major and deep social divisions.
Furthermore, a number of countries and even entire regions are regularly hit by food crises. We will probably discuss this later, but there is every reason to believe that this crisis will become worse in the near future and may reach extreme forms. There are also shortages of water and electricity (we will probably cover this today as well), not to mention poverty, high unemployment rates or lack of adequate healthcare.
Lagging countries are fully aware of that and are losing faith in the prospects of ever catching up with the leaders. Disappointment spurs aggression and pushes people to join the ranks of extremists. People in these countries have a growing sense of unfulfilled and failed expectations and the lack of any opportunities not only for themselves, but for their children, as well. This is what makes them look for better lives and results in uncontrolled migration, which, in turn, creates fertile ground for social discontent in more prosperous countries. I do not need to explain anything to you, since you can see everything with your own eyes and are, probably, versed on these matters even better than I.
As I noted earlier, prosperous leading powers have other pressing social problems, challenges and risks in ample supply, and many among them are no longer interested in fighting for influence since, as they say, they already have enough on their plates. The fact that society and young people in many countries have overreacted in a harsh and even aggressive manner to measures to combat the coronavirus showed – and I want to emphasise this, I hope someone has already mentioned this before me at other venues – so, I think that this reaction showed that the pandemic was just a pretext: the causes for social irritation and frustration run much deeper.
I have another important point to make. The pandemic, which, in theory, was supposed to rally the people in the fight against this massive common threat, has instead become a divisive rather than a unifying factor. There are many reasons for that, but one of the main ones is that they started looking for solutions to problems among the usual approaches – a variety of them, but still the old ones, but they just do not work. Or, to be more precise, they do work, but often and oddly enough, they worsen the existing state of affairs.
By the way, Russia has repeatedly called for, and I will repeat this, stopping these inappropriate ambitions and for working together. We will probably talk about this later but it is clear what I have in mind. We are talking about the need to counter the coronavirus infection together. But nothing changes; everything remains the same despite the humanitarian considerations. I am not referring to Russia now, let’s leave the sanctions against Russia for now; I mean the sanctions that remain in place against those states that badly need international assistance. Where are the humanitarian fundamentals of Western political thought? It appears there is nothing there, just idle talk. Do you understand? This is what seems to be on the surface.
Furthermore, the technological revolution, impressive achievements in artificial intelligence, electronics, communications, genetics, bioengineering, and medicine open up enormous opportunities, but at the same time, in practical terms, they raise philosophical, moral and spiritual questions that were until recently the exclusive domain of science fiction writers. What will happen if machines surpass humans in the ability to think? Where is the limit of interference in the human body beyond which a person ceases being himself and turns into some other entity? What are the general ethical limits in the world where the potential of science and machines are becoming almost boundless? What will this mean for each of us, for our descendants, our nearest descendants – our children and grandchildren?
These changes are gaining momentum, and they certainly cannot be stopped because they are objective as a rule. All of us will have to deal with the consequences regardless of our political systems, economic condition or prevailing ideology.
Verbally, all states talk about their commitment to the ideals of cooperation and a willingness to work together for resolving common problems but, unfortunately, these are just words. In reality, the opposite is happening, and the pandemic has served to fuel the negative trends that emerged long ago and are now only getting worse. The approach based on the proverb, “your own shirt is closer to the body,” has finally become common and is now no longer even concealed. Moreover, this is often even a matter of boasting and brandishing. Egotistic interests prevail over the notion of the common good.
Of course, the problem is not just the ill will of certain states and notorious elites. It is more complicated than that, in my opinion. In general, life is seldom divided into black and white. Every government, every leader is primarily responsible to his own compatriots, obviously. The main goal is to ensure their security, peace and prosperity. So, international, transnational issues will never be as important for a national leadership as domestic stability. In general, this is normal and correct.
We need to face the fact the global governance institutions are not always effective and their capabilities are not always up to the challenge posed by the dynamics of global processes. In this sense, the pandemic could help – it clearly showed which institutions have what it takes and which need fine-tuning.
The re-alignment of the balance of power presupposes a redistribution of shares in favour of rising and developing countries that until now felt left out. To put it bluntly, the Western domination of international affairs, which began several centuries ago and, for a short period, was almost absolute in the late 20th century, is giving way to a much more diverse system.
This transformation is not a mechanical process and, in its own way, one might even say, is unparalleled. Arguably, political history has no examples of a stable world order being established without a big war and its outcomes as the basis, as was the case after World War II. So, we have a chance to create an extremely favourable precedent. The attempt to create it after the end of the Cold War on the basis of Western domination failed, as we see. The current state of international affairs is a product of that very failure, and we must learn from this.
Some may wonder, what have we arrived at? We have arrived somewhere paradoxical. Just an example: for two decades, the most powerful nation in the world has been conducting military campaigns in two countries that it cannot be compared to by any standard. But in the end, it had to wind down operations without achieving a single goal that it had set for itself going in 20 years ago, and to withdraw from these countries causing considerable damage to others and itself. In fact, the situation has worsened dramatically.
But that is not the point. Previously, a war lost by one side meant victory for the other side, which took responsibility for what was happening. For example, the defeat of the United States in the Vietnam War, for example, did not make Vietnam a “black hole.” On the contrary, a successfully developing state arose there, which, admittedly, relied on the support of a strong ally. Things are different now: no matter who takes the upper hand, the war does not stop, but just changes form. As a rule, the hypothetical winner is reluctant or unable to ensure peaceful post-war recovery, and only worsens the chaos and the vacuum posing a danger to the world.
Colleagues,
What do you think are the starting points of this complex realignment process? Let me try to summarise the talking points.
First, the coronavirus pandemic has clearly shown that the international order is structured around nation states. By the way, recent developments have shown that global digital platforms – with all their might, which we could see from the internal political processes in the United States – have failed to usurp political or state functions. These attempts proved ephemeral. The US authorities, as I said, have immediately put the owners of these platforms in their place, which is exactly what is being done in Europe, if you just look at the size of the fines imposed on them and the demonopolisation measures being taken. You are aware of that.
In recent decades, many have tossed around fancy concepts claiming that the role of the state was outdated and outgoing. Globalisation supposedly made national borders an anachronism, and sovereignty an obstacle to prosperity. You know, I said it before and I will say it again. This is also what was said by those who attempted to open up other countries’ borders for the benefit of their own competitive advantages. This is what actually happened. And as soon as it transpired that someone somewhere is achieving great results, they immediately returned to closing borders in general and, first of all, their own customs borders and what have you, and started building walls. Well, were we supposed to not notice, or what? Everyone sees everything and everyone understands everything perfectly well. Of course, they do.
There is no point in disputing it anymore. It is obvious. But events, when we spoke about the need to open up borders, events, as I said, went in the opposite direction. Only sovereign states can effectively respond to the challenges of the times and the demands of the citizens. Accordingly, any effective international order should take into account the interests and capabilities of the state and proceed on that basis, and not try to prove that they should not exist. Furthermore, it is impossible to impose anything on anyone, be it the principles underlying the sociopolitical structure or values that someone, for their own reasons, has called universal. After all, it is clear that when a real crisis strikes, there is only one universal value left and that is human life, which each state decides for itself how best to protect based on its abilities, culture and traditions.
In this regard, I will again note how severe and dangerous the coronavirus pandemic has become. As we know, more than 4.9 million have died of it. These terrifying figures are comparable and even exceed the military losses of the main participants in World War I.
The second point I would like to draw your attention to is the scale of change that forces us to act extremely cautiously, if only for reasons of self-preservation. The state and society must not respond radically to qualitative shifts in technology, dramatic environmental changes or the destruction of traditional systems. It is easier to destroy than to create, as we all know. We in Russia know this very well, regrettably, from our own experience, which we have had several times.
Just over a century ago, Russia objectively faced serious problems, including because of the ongoing World War I, but its problems were not bigger and possibly even smaller or not as acute as the problems the other countries faced, and Russia could have dealt with its problems gradually and in a civilised manner. But revolutionary shocks led to the collapse and disintegration of a great power. The second time this happened 30 years ago, when a potentially very powerful nation failed to enter the path of urgently needed, flexible but thoroughly substantiated reforms at the right time, and as a result it fell victim to all kinds of dogmatists, both reactionary ones and the so-called progressives – all of them did their bit, all sides did.
These examples from our history allow us to say that revolutions are not a way to settle a crisis but a way to aggravate it. No revolution was worth the damage it did to the human potential.
Third. The importance of a solid support in the sphere of morals, ethics and values is increasing dramatically in the modern fragile world. In point of fact, values are a product, a unique product of cultural and historical development of any nation. The mutual interlacing of nations definitely enriches them, openness expands their horizons and allows them to take a fresh look at their own traditions. But the process must be organic, and it can never be rapid. Any alien elements will be rejected anyway, possibly bluntly. Any attempts to force one’s values on others with an uncertain and unpredictable outcome can only further complicate a dramatic situation and usually produce the opposite reaction and an opposite from the intended result.
We look in amazement at the processes underway in the countries which have been traditionally looked at as the standard-bearers of progress. Of course, the social and cultural shocks that are taking place in the United States and Western Europe are none of our business; we are keeping out of this. Some people in the West believe that an aggressive elimination of entire pages from their own history, “reverse discrimination” against the majority in the interests of a minority, and the demand to give up the traditional notions of mother, father, family and even gender, they believe that all of these are the mileposts on the path towards social renewal.
Listen, I would like to point out once again that they have a right to do this, we are keeping out of this. But we would like to ask them to keep out of our business as well. We have a different viewpoint, at least the overwhelming majority of Russian society – it would be more correct to put it this way – has a different opinion on this matter. We believe that we must rely on our own spiritual values, our historical tradition and the culture of our multiethnic nation.
The advocates of so-called ‘social progress’ believe they are introducing humanity to some kind of a new and better consciousness. Godspeed, hoist the flags as we say, go right ahead. The only thing that I want to say now is that their prescriptions are not new at all. It may come as a surprise to some people, but Russia has been there already. After the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks, relying on the dogmas of Marx and Engels, also said that they would change existing ways and customs and not just political and economic ones, but the very notion of human morality and the foundations of a healthy society. The destruction of age-old values, religion and relations between people, up to and including the total rejection of family (we had that, too), encouragement to inform on loved ones – all this was proclaimed progress and, by the way, was widely supported around the world back then and was quite fashionable, same as today. By the way, the Bolsheviks were absolutely intolerant of opinions other than theirs.
This, I believe, should call to mind some of what we are witnessing now. Looking at what is happening in a number of Western countries, we are amazed to see the domestic practices, which we, fortunately, have left, I hope, in the distant past. The fight for equality and against discrimination has turned into aggressive dogmatism bordering on absurdity, when the works of the great authors of the past – such as Shakespeare – are no longer taught at schools or universities, because their ideas are believed to be backward. The classics are declared backward and ignorant of the importance of gender or race. In Hollywood memos are distributed about proper storytelling and how many characters of what colour or gender should be in a movie. This is even worse than the agitprop department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
Countering acts of racism is a necessary and noble cause, but the new ‘cancel culture’ has turned it into ‘reverse discrimination’ that is, reverse racism. The obsessive emphasis on race is further dividing people, when the real fighters for civil rights dreamed precisely about erasing differences and refusing to divide people by skin colour. I specifically asked my colleagues to find the following quote from Martin Luther King: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by their character.” This is the true value. However, things are turning out differently there. By the way, the absolute majority of Russian people do not think that the colour of a person’s skin or their gender is an important matter. Each of us is a human being. This is what matters.
In a number of Western countries, the debate over men’s and women’s rights has turned into a perfect phantasmagoria. Look, beware of going where the Bolsheviks once planned to go – not only communalising chickens, but also communalising women. One more step and you will be there.
Zealots of these new approaches even go so far as to want to abolish these concepts altogether. Anyone who dares mention that men and women actually exist, which is a biological fact, risk being ostracised. “Parent number one” and “parent number two,” “’birthing parent” instead of “mother,” and “human milk” replacing “breastmilk” because it might upset the people who are unsure about their own gender. I repeat, this is nothing new; in the 1920s, the so-called Soviet Kulturtraegers also invented some newspeak believing they were creating a new consciousness and changing values that way. And, as I have already said, they made such a mess it still makes one shudder at times.
Not to mention some truly monstrous things when children are taught from an early age that a boy can easily become a girl and vice versa. That is, the teachers actually impose on them a choice we all supposedly have. They do so while shutting the parents out of the process and forcing the child to make decisions that can upend their entire life. They do not even bother to consult with child psychologists – is a child at this age even capable of making a decision of this kind? Calling a spade a spade, this verges on a crime against humanity, and it is being done in the name and under the banner of progress.
Well, if someone likes this, let them do it. I have already mentioned that, in shaping our approaches, we will be guided by a healthy conservatism. That was a few years ago, when passions on the international arena were not yet running as high as they are now, although, of course, we can say that clouds were gathering even then. Now, when the world is going through a structural disruption, the importance of reasonable conservatism as the foundation for a political course has skyrocketed – precisely because of the multiplying risks and dangers, and the fragility of the reality around us.
This conservative approach is not about an ignorant traditionalism, a fear of change or a restraining game, much less about withdrawing into our own shell. It is primarily about reliance on a time-tested tradition, the preservation and growth of the population, a realistic assessment of oneself and others, a precise alignment of priorities, a correlation of necessity and possibility, a prudent formulation of goals, and a fundamental rejection of extremism as a method. And frankly, in the impending period of global reconstruction, which may take quite long, with its final design being uncertain, moderate conservatism is the most reasonable line of conduct, as far as I see it. It will inevitably change at some point, but so far, do no harm – the guiding principle in medicine – seems to be the most rational one. Noli nocere, as they say.
Again, for us in Russia, these are not some speculative postulates, but lessons from our difficult and sometimes tragic history. The cost of ill-conceived social experiments is sometimes beyond estimation. Such actions can destroy not only the material, but also the spiritual foundations of human existence, leaving behind moral wreckage where nothing can be built to replace it for a long time.
Finally, there is one more point I want to make. We understand all too well that resolving many urgent problems the world has been facing would be impossible without close international cooperation. However, we need to be realistic: most of the pretty slogans about coming up with global solutions to global problems that we have been hearing since the late 20th century will never become reality. In order to achieve a global solution, states and people have to transfer their sovereign rights to supra-national structures to an extent that few, if any, would accept. This is primarily attributable to the fact that you have to answer for the outcomes of such policies not to some global public, but to your citizens and voters.
However, this does not mean that exercising some restraint for the sake of bringing about solutions to global challenges is impossible. After all, a global challenge is a challenge for all of us together, and to each of us in particular. If everyone saw a way to benefit from cooperation in overcoming these challenges, this would definitely leave us better equipped to work together.
One of the ways to promote these efforts could be, for example, to draw up, at the UN level, a list of challenges and threats that specific countries face, with details of how they could affect other countries. This effort could involve experts from various countries and academic fields, including you, my colleagues. We believe that developing a roadmap of this kind could inspire many countries to see global issues in a new light and understand how cooperation could be beneficial for them.
I have already mentioned the challenges international institutions are facing. Unfortunately, this is an obvious fact: it is now a question of reforming or closing some of them. However, the United Nations as the central international institution retains its enduring value, at least for now. I believe that in our turbulent world it is the UN that brings a touch of reasonable conservatism into international relations, something that is so important for normalising the situation.
Many criticise the UN for failing to adapt to a rapidly changing world. In part, this is true, but it is not the UN, but primarily its members who are to blame for this. In addition, this international body promotes not only international norms, but also the rule-making spirit, which is based on the principles of equality and maximum consideration for everyone’s opinions. Our mission is to preserve this heritage while reforming the organisation. However, in doing so we need to make sure that we do not throw the baby out with the bathwater, as the saying goes.
This is not the first time I am using a high rostrum to make this call for collective action in order to face up to the problems that continue to pile up and become more acute. It is thanks to you, friends and colleagues, that the Valdai Club is emerging or has already established itself as a high-profile forum. It is for this reason that I am turning to this platform to reaffirm our readiness to work together on addressing the most urgent problems that the world is facing today.
Friends,
The changes mentioned here prior to me, as well as by yours truly, are relevant to all countries and peoples. Russia, of course, is not an exception. Just like everyone else, we are searching for answers to the most urgent challenges of our time.
Of course, no one has any ready-made recipes. However, I would venture to say that our country has an advantage. Let me explain what this advantage is. It is to do with our historical experience. You may have noticed that I have referred to it several times in the course of my remarks. Unfortunately, we had to bring back many sad memories, but at least our society has developed what they now refer to as herd immunity to extremism that paves the way to upheavals and socioeconomic cataclysms. People really value stability and being able to live normal lives and to prosper while confident that the irresponsible aspirations of yet another group of revolutionaries will not upend their plans and aspirations. Many have vivid memories of what happened 30 years ago and all the pain it took to climb out of the ditch where our country and our society found themselves after the USSR fell apart.
The conservative views we hold are an optimistic conservatism, which is what matters the most. We believe stable, positive development to be possible. It all depends primarily on our own efforts. Of course, we are ready to work with our partners on common noble causes.
I would like to thank all participants once more, for your attention. As the tradition goes, I will gladly answer or at least try to answer your questions.
Thank you for your patience.
[ end ]
[ Wolf here ]
Before we even get started, note how much the intelligence of that speech differs from our phony President Biden. It’s even smarter than speech-making puppet and ACTUAL President, Barack Obama.
Now – don’t think for a SECOND that Mr. Putin isn’t one VERY cagey cat who’s looking to eat that singing caged bird when nobody is looking.
From the moment Putin shills for phony Globo-Soviet China-helping “climate change”, you know he’s not in it to speak the truth unless that truth benefits Russia.
Yeah, you can say that he’s “playing along with the Globalists”, but why is that?
RUSSIA FIRST. It is smarter for him to play along openly on a strategy that harms America more than Russia, and overtly helps China, than to flip that around and make his own country suffer, merely for credit with a few opponents of globalism in a primary globalist adversary (meaning the United States).
Never for a moment think this guy is saying anything to help America – unless it helps Russia first.
This is part of nationalism, or at least Russia’s version of it. Just accept that, IMO.
From there, also understand that Putin is always looking out for China, too. Russia and China will always have a very complex relationship, where mutual suspicions and mutual courtesies include NEVER saying the wrong thing, risking destabilizing that relationship, and always upholding each other’s SCAMS.
OK? Got that?
The TRUTH only goes so far with Putin. After that, it’s RUSSIA FIRST, LIES OR NO LIES.
Nevertheless, Putin goes on to provide an AMAZING set of NON-HYPOCRITICAL arguments:
FOR nationalism
FOR conservatism
FOR sovereignty
AGAINST wokism
AGAINST “racist anti-racism”
AGAINST tyranny of the minority
AGAINST Bolshevism
AGAINST extremism
AGAINST gender / sexual minority insanity
AGAINST Western liberal excess
AGAINST revolution
AGAINST transhumanism
AGAINST destruction of society
This is exactly what Sundance is saying. Putin has jumped off his bear, and has GRABBED credibility by both horns, and is milking the bull for all the national macho it will provide!
Corrupt, Soviet-honeymooning, dementia-addled weakling Biden, selling out to China, has given Russia an extraordinary opportunity to recover Soviet-era levels of prominence on the world stage – but without all the stinky Bolshevik baggage of old. Full of fleas and bedbugs, that baggage was gladly taken off Russia’s hands by Democrat doufuses and traitors.
In my opinion, this is exactly where Russia wants things.
I have more opinions, but I will save those for the comments.
What do YOU think of Putin’s speech?
W
Civil rights as distinct from minority tyranny. What a concept! Wonder where that started?
Nobody would be calling ALL of the various full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein vaccines “the clot shot” if there weren’t some clear and obvious problems with the full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike proteinITSELF.
We already know that clotting dysfunction is key to COVID-19 pathogenicity. SO – it’s not exactly a surprise that the spike protein itself, and likewise the S1 subunit of that protein – a.k.a. THE BUSINESS END – are themselves pathogenic.
In the above example, the S1 subunit of the spike protein was basically 100% lethal to humanized mice when applied to their lungs.
And when they looked at the mice, the damage was basically the same as the damage from COVID-19.
Just sayin’.
So let me now TEST you, and see if you’re more of a scientist than Fauci’s protege Rochelle Alinsky – WHOOPS – I mean Rochelle Walensky – who heads the CDC for Fauci to maintain control of it.
If you give a SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE to somebody, and they have symptoms of COVID-19 during the next few days, or even during the next two weeks, which scenario is more likely?
(A) – The person just happened to get real COVID-19, and THAT spike protein did BAD THINGS.
(B) – The spike protein you put inside the person did BAD THINGS.
Do you see how science works?
It’s a lot like common sense, only it’s applied to fancy stuff.
I want you to meet some great scientists here. These are people with very little scientific authority, but they simply practiced science, instead of repeating what authorities told them.
(1) – The CNA who would not accept “super-spreader” myths
This guy was one of the first people to administer the Pfizer vaccine to nursing home residents.
He was shocked that his nursing home residents would die shortly after being vaccinated – after having survived for months BEFORE the vaccine – in a way that was clearly related to their being vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine.
Nursing home management would NOT admit to the obvious connection – and created a mythical “super-spreader” to explain the deaths.
This man is a HERO.
The first 10 minutes of the video is this man working up the courage of conscience – to SPEAK THE TRUTH. If you just want to hear what he needed to say, you can jump to 10 minutes and you will hear the SCIENCE.
(2) – From Physician’s Assistant to VAERS Whistleblower
This lady, a hospital physician’s assistant, started out as a “COVID training true believer”, but she began observing what the shots were doing in her hospital. From there, she began encountering resistance to “doing the right thing”.
Now, in retrospect, you can see everybody in the system avoiding responsibility – not just for the problem, but for even reporting it.
A fantastic interview by Del Bigtree’s Highwire show.
This doctor discovered not only that “the jab” was leading to loss of wind (reduced effort tolerance) in too many of his patients – a whopping 62% of all his patients were showing signs of microscopic clotting – similar to COVID-19 – after vaccination.
Thus, you will see that we were READY when a good explanation of the clot shot arose.
II. The Explanation
I want to start by thanking barkerjim for posting a comment with a link that leads to a very recent paper (pre-peer-review, of course) that explains the clot shot. He found the link HERE on Denninger’s Market Ticker site.
“Here we report that the Spike protein from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) binds to the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and induces structurally abnormal blood clots with heightened proinflammatory activity. SARS-CoV-2 Spike virions enhanced fibrin-mediated microglia activation and induced fibrinogen-dependent lung pathology. COVID-19 patients had fibrin autoantibodies that persisted long after acute infection.”
“The central structural component of blood clots, and a key regulator of inflammation in disease, is insoluble fibrin, which is derived from the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and is deposited in tissues at sites of vascular damage (10, 11). Hypercoagulability in COVID-19 is associated with inflammation and the formation of fibrin clots resistant to degradation despite adequate anticoagulation (3-5). Extensive fibrin deposits are detected locally in inflamed lung and brain tissues from COVID-19 patients, sometimes without evidence of direct viral infection at autopsy (1, 8, 12-14). The high prevalence of thrombotic events with these unique hypercoagulability features suggests an as yet unknown mechanism of abnormal blood clot formation in COVID-19. We set out to determine how blood clots form in COVID-19 and to identify therapies to combat the deleterious effects of abnormal coagulation occurring in acute and convalescent stages of disease.”
“Since hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients has features distinct from those of other inflammatory diseases, we hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 directly affects the structural and functional properties of blood clots. Incubation of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant trimeric spike protein (Spike) with healthy donor plasma increased fibrin polymerization (Fig. 1A). Spike strikingly altered the fibrin clot structure resulting in thinner fibers with a rough appearance and increased clot density as shown by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Fig. 1B, fig. S1), identifying direct effects of SARS-CoV-2 Spike on fibrin clot architecture. Consistent with these structural changes, a solid-phase binding assay revealed binding of Spike to both fibrinogen and fibrin (Kd 5.3 μM and 0.4 μM, respectively) (Fig. 1C). Fibrinogen immunoprecipitated with full-length recombinant trimeric Spike, and studies with deletion mutants identified an interaction with the S2 domain of Spike (Fig. 1D, fig. S2).”
“Intravenous administration of Spike PVs in wild-type (WT) mice induced extensive fibrin deposition in the lung (Fig. 2A). (…) Fibrin deposition was associated with activated endothelium in the lung, and gene expression analysis revealed increased expression of endothelial and inflammatory markers in Spike PV-injected mice (…) consistent with findings of SARS-CoV-2 toxicity to endothelial cells (19). (…) Mice genetically-deficient in fibrinogen (Fgα–/– mice), which express all other blood proteins except fibrinogen and are protected from autoimmune and inflammatory conditions (11), did not exhibit lung pathology following Spike PV challenge (Fig. 2E, fig. S5).”
“Fibrinogen is causally linked to the activation of macrophages and microglia in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in the brain and periphery (11, 21). Fibrin is a driver of microglia-induced cognitive dysfunction (22) and is associated with perivascular-activated microglia and macrophages in brains of COVID-19 patients even without signs of infection (12).”
“A surge of autoantibody production against diverse immune targets have been detected in COVID-19 patients (25). To determine whether COVID-19 patients develop autoantibodies against abnormal blood clots, we tested autoantibody responses to fibrin. (…) We tested longitudinally collected serum samples ranging from acute to convalescent disease stages from 54 COVID-19 asymptomatic, mild, and severe disease patients requiring admission to the intensive care units (table S3). Fibrin autoantibodies were abundant in all three groups of COVID-19 patients and persisted during the convalescent stage, but were scarce in healthy donor controls or in subjects with non-COVID respiratory illnesses (Fig. 4A, B).”
“In summary, we find that SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein enhances the formation of highly inflammatory clots that are neutralized by a fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody. Our data shed new light on the enigmatic coagulopathy found in COVID-19 revealing a causal role for fibrinogen in thromboinflammation – even independent of active viral replication. The high incidence of clotting complications in COVID-19 has been attributed to systemic inflammation (3), vascular damage including abnormal levels of circulating coagulation proteins (1, 26), genetic susceptibility to tissue factor and complement genes (27), and prothrombotic autoantibodies (28). Our findings now show that coagulopathy is not merely a consequence of inflammation. Rather, the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 Spike with fibrinogen and fibrin results in abnormal blood clot formation that in turn drives inflammation.”
[ THIS HERE IS THE PART TO READ ]
Assuming the results are correct – and I can see little reason to doubt them though replication is always important – this really starts to put the puzzle pieces together. I’m frankly amazed that it took so long to figure this out.
In less-scientific language:
1. The spike protein binds directly to fibrinogen, the protein precursor of fibrin which forms blood clots.
2. This binding causes the fibrinogen to polymerize to form fibrin strands, thus forming clots.
3. Spike binding to fibrin in clots also changes the clot structure and renders it resistant to degradation.
4. Fibrin induces immune inflammation. This is usually adaptive because clotting occurs at sites of injury. It is dangerous when it occurs in response to diffuse and extensive spike-mediated micro-clotting. This helps to explain the runaway immune-mediated inflammatory response characteristic of severe Covid-19.
5. Spike *alone* (in the absence of an infectious virus) induces fibrin deposition and inflammation in the lungs of mice. However, mice lacking the gene for fibrinogen exhibited no pathology upon spike exposure, demonstrating that the fibrinogen-spike interaction is necessary and sufficient for spike-induced pathology.
6. Fibrin induces cognitive dysfunction via immune inflammation in the brain.
7. Many recovered Covid-19 patients have abundant autoantibodies against fibrin – independent of disease severity – while these autoantibodies are rare in unexposed people. This indicates both that spike-mediated fibrin formation is occurring in the course of actual human infection, and that autoreactive antibodies are formed which may play a role in chronic/long-haul symptoms or prolonged clotting problems.
8. A fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody greatly reduced inflammation, suggesting a potential new route for disease treatment.
The paper never uses the word “vaccine” – a glaring and clearly intentional omission – but it should be obvious based on these findings that instructing the body to produce large amounts of spike protein on multiple occasions is a dangerous prospect, and it also explains those autopsy revelations of bodies full of clots.
One caveat: The coordinating author is working with a start-up company to develop treatments based on reducing fibrin-mediated inflammation, so there is clearly some commercial interest here that could be influencing objectivity. On the other hand, it is often the entrepreneurial think-outside-the-box types who end up making groundbreaking discoveries.
Mark L
[ BOOM!!! ]
This is AMAZING and powerful work.
Remember that scientific paper that we started this article with?
NOW we know exactly how that happens. See how the SCIENCE is all connecting together?
The commenter on Ecosophia makes TWO critical points.
POINT ONE is that vaccines are never mentioned. That is how this work will eventually be published. The Rochelle Alinsky CDC could STOP the paper as potentially causing “vaccine hesitancy” if the authors mentioned vaccines, but by throwing no stones, none bounce back.
The CDC will still likely DELAY this from being published for as long as they can. But by avoiding mention of vaccines, the paper cannot be scuttled on the grounds that it “might cause vaccine hesitancy”, which is the FALSE IMPERATIVE that the CDC socialists use to control science and force vaccines on us as a social sabotage. Instead, the READER can make the connections and understand the implications for vaccines.
Do you see why PREPUBLICATION COMMUNICATIONS (like this one) are now so important?
POINT TWO is that it’s JUST THE SPIKE PROTEIN – NOT THE VIRUS AS A WHOLE – that causes the problems. And it’s been PROVEN. And it’s been PROVEN that THIS is the mechanism of the problems induced by the spike protein.
The moniker of “CLOT SHOT” is literally proven to be correct.
This is a BOMBSHELL because it indicts the entire concept of full-length spike protein vaccines as fundamentally flawed. It indicts mRNA vaccines as even more flawed than antigen, because the amount of toxic spike protein is unregulated. (Notice that I’ve been saying this all along.) It doesn’t necessarily say that other types of vaccines (like RBD subunit antigen vaccines) are any safer than spike protein antigen vaccines, but they MIGHT BE.
Something even BETTER here, than just the fibrinogen mechanism, is the way that this EXPLAINS (point 4 above) what one nurse practitioner observed – that COVID strikes PRE-EXISTING INFLAMMATION. Both the WHY of some people having severe COVID and others not, and the LOCATION of those issues, is explained by fibrin’s ties to pre-existing inflammation. We now have a mechanism which we already know follows that rule, because that’s how fibrin works.
This also explains why antihistamines work to save people from severe COVID. Antihistamines are generally useful against severe inflammation by pathogenic substances which cause inflammatory reactions. It’s why they administer benadryl as a general emergency antiinflammatory for purposes like anaphylaxis prevention.
Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …
And yet the CDC has WARNED people against taking antihistamines with the vaccine – when this work LITERALLY PROVES WHY THAT IS A GOOD STRATEGY – just as it is a good strategy to take antihistamines to protect against severe COVID.
Like I said, this study proves THAT we were right, and WHY we were right.
And why is CDC so WRONG – time and time again?
This is a breaker of logjams. The insistence on the use of a fundamentally flawed vaccine is CRIMINAL.
Mandates are bad enough, but over a vaccine, the very principle of which is scientifically proven as DANGEROUS?
If mandates continue, these people need to be in JAIL. If they RESIST, they need to be OVERTHROWN.
Mandating this fundamentally dangerous vaccine is so wrong on so many levels.
This is a EUGENIC VACCINE if there ever was one. It’s almost DESIGNED to finish off people who are not 100% healthy.
How can this be right? Seriously. How can this be right?
We can no longer tolerate these people who pretend not to know.
III. The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand
I start this section by thanking three people – Sundance, Aubergine, and Trumpismine – who helped me to see what is going on here.
SUNDANCE informed me of the “Mamet Principle” – that liberals pretend not to know things
AUBERGINE formulated her wonderful Razor – that it is dangerous to dismiss such pretense as mere stupidity, when it might be the product of malice or guile.
TRUMPISMINE turned me on to the Wikipedia definition of Lysenkoism, which contained enough detail that I was able to connect the goals of old Lysenkoism to the actions of the left today.
The so-called Mamet Principle is a paraphrase of a repeated point by David Mamet, which Sundance encapsulated as a principle. This has been discussed and exemplified many times, both here and on CTH.
In asking WHY liberals “pretend not to know things”, we now understand that Hanlon’s Razor is an EXCUSE – that it’s COVER – and that it’s NOT because they’re STUPID, but rather because they’re smart and evil.
The best and most concise description is a reworking of Hanlon’s Razor by our own Aubergine.
So what if we apply this to Saint Fauci of Antibodies?
Anthony Fauci has a literal MAGICIAN’S POWER to make people focus on the WRONG THING. His skills of EVASION are absolutely outstanding. I love to call it “antibody hypnosis”, because that is exactly what it seems like.
“YOU WILL LOOK AT THE ANTIBODIES. THE ANTIBODIES WILL SAVE YOU. LOOK ONLY AT THE ANTIBODIES. YOU ARE FEELING WARM. YOU ARE FEELING SAFE. YOU ARE HAPPY ABOUT THE ANTIBODIES. THE MORE ANTIBODIES YOU SEE, THE WARMER YOU FEEL – LIKE THE SUN ON YOUR FACE ON A BEACH.”
You even hear his voice when you read that – don’t you? That gravelly, reassuring voice.
It’s VERY intentional.
Focusing on ONE WRONG THING – or even ONE RIGHT THING – is a technique of misdirection, but it is one of the BEST ways of pretending not to know things.
“Let’s only talk about this.”
Rand Paul knows all about it. He has gone many rounds with the Fauci critter.
But it’s not just Fauci.
His protege in CDC, who gives Fauci effective control of medical science, is every bit as bad.
It even includes Rand Paul’s colleagues in Congress.
The man behind the launch of censorship. Is this guy even AMERICAN?
What a PUTZ.
ANYWAY, this is where I started to figure things out.
This WEIRD LOVE of the radical left for brutal, aggressive, stupid, uncaring science – where does it come from?
I did not expect the answer that I found, with the help of Trumpismine and Wikipedia.
It’s very helpful to read this, including this part:
Marxism–Leninism postulated “universal and immutable laws of history” (historical materialism and dialectical materialism), which assumed unavoidable large-scale change at the collective level of societies.[5]Collectivism was a key feature of Marxism; Darwin’s concept of a random mutation in an individual being able to propagate and transform subsequent generations was at odds with the ideology, and was perceived as having a strong liberal inclination.[6] Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]
Most people brought up in mainstream, establishment, Western science use the term Lysenkoism without really understanding the political angle of it. We understand it merely as “politics being imposed on scientists in the Soviet Union, which set back Soviet biological science by decades.”
Yes, that’s true, but it’s not ALL of the truth. The more you know about it, the more it looks EXACTLY like “Woke Science”.
As an aside, clearly it makes sense WHY China (and to a lesser extent Russia) would want to promote Lysenkoism in the United States, as part of their own interests. “China First” and “Russia First” by socialist and ex-socialist means are unlikely to be pretty. “Fuck the other guy up so he can’t win” is a valid technique in a corrupt world.
But it goes deeper.
Lysenkoism is far less about being STUPID, than about being REVOLUTIONARY. That is a critical idea. That quality of being revolutionary makes mistakes, and when it does, it’s generally STUPID. But when it does NOT make mistakes, it’s generally EVIL.
Let me repeat what I said, earlier about Lysenkoism.
You know what? This is actually really interesting reading.
In a WEIRD WAY – Lysenko was “right”, in that he maniacally predicted EXACTLY what the communists are doing NOW with gene therapy. His assertion of a “genetic dialectic” – of the “evolutionary” in conflict with the “revolutionary” – is actually what we’re seeing RIGHT NOW with the “natural evolution” crowd (US) versus the commie-forced gene therapy crowd (THEM).
Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]
It was just total hubris and pathological commie science – a lot like what we see from Fauci, Gates and Walensky – but it “anticipated” what WOULD come eventually through science – that someday WE would have the power to do the things – and make the mistakes – that we are making now.
So in many ways these people ARE the intellectual inheritors of Lysenkoism!!!
Lysenko’s mistake was claiming that things WERE what they merely COULD BE through greater understanding.
Imagine some person coming BEFORE Galileo and trying to FORCE heliocentrism in their country – killing, jailing, ousting, and attacking the geocentrists.
In a sense, that was Lysenko, who attacked natural evolution.
Natural processes are “evolution”.
Genetic modification is “revolution”.
The dude was a NUT, trying to assert that the NATURAL was both, when it’s almost all ONE. But if he would have simply said “We must become revolutionary in genetics, which is merely evolutionary now”, then he would have been like the Lenin of biology, and he would likely be admired today by all these crazy leftists and depoppers, instead of an old Soviet embarrassment.
But ALL OF THAT comes back and tells me that these people are the modern recapitulation of Lysenkoist THOUGHT, but using the GAINS of actual evolutionary understanding.
The nutbaggery we see NOW with the communist jab-maniacs, is just like Lysenko’s assertions, only MORE REAL because they have MORE TECH.
[END QUOTE]
Soviet science, and Lysenko in particular, were characterized by a kind of VIRTUE SIGNALING, and that is what we are seeing now on universities, only it tends to be about peripheral things, like race, diversity, gender – whatever is in leftist vogue.
But NOW, in our phony socialist “pandemic”, we are seeing the virtue signals rise to levels that affect the practice of science itself. It’s starting at GOALS, but very soon, it will get a bit like CLIMATE LYSENKOISM, where people CHANGE DATA, HIDE DATA, DROP EVIDENCE, and basically act like MAINSTREAM MEDIA JOURNALISTS, who are in a continuous state of covering things up by omission, distraction, and promotion of contradicting narratives.
That is NOT GOOD.
I think that we are now seeing with publications like the one featured in this article, is some PUSH-BACK by scientists who realize where things are headed – a VERY BAD place. They are GETTING THE TRUTH OUT.
We need to help promote awareness of science that CDC and the communist infiltration are going to hide.
W
On August 7, 1948, at the end of a week-long session organised by Lysenko and approved by Stalin,[14] the V.I. Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences announced that from that point on Lysenkoism would be taught as “the only correct theory.” Soviet scientists were forced to denounce any work that contradicted Lysenko.[19] Criticism of Lysenko was denounced as “bourgeois” or “fascist,” and analogous “non-bourgeois” theories also flourished in other fields such as linguistics and art in the Soviet academy at this time. Perhaps the only opponents of Lysenkoism during Stalin’s lifetime to escape liquidation were from the small community of Soviet nuclear physicists: as Tony Judt has observed, “It is significant that Stalin left his nuclear physicists alone and never presumed to second guess their calculations. Stalin may well have been mad but he was not stupid.”[20]
As we have been repeatedly warned – even by the VERY ENEMIES who are attacking us (i.e., KlauSS “Hog-Jowls” SSchwab and the WEFFEN SS), there was going to be a “cyber war” this summer – obviously timed to deal with the “fall” of the FAKE ELECTION and the CHINA VIRUS. Thus, between the CHINAZIS and …
It’s instructive to go back and look at it.
What you will see is an historical record of the increasing attacks on both this site and (by extension) our hosting company, who I always refer to as COUGHCOUGH.com, just to keep the attack surface a bit smaller, every time I don’t post their name.
Even if you know who it is.
Now, however, I would like to talk about our hosts a bit more, still not quite saying their name out loud.
Please continue to pray for them. They are in a tough spot. As will become VERY clear.
Since we began having serious problems on the site, I learned much more about how exactly we are being hosted. Even though we have upgraded our plan, we are still not hosted as “nicely” as I would like. I may spring for an even nicer plan.
Without going into the exact reasons, it is literally impossible for our server to be secure against intrusion by both American and “other” spy agencies and militaries. Thus, as soon as I became aware of the facts of our hosting, I realized that this site is simply not secure against state-level hacking and control.
That would include both the good guys and the bad guys.
Just as an ASIDE, when we were on WordPressDotCom, the “good guys” (or whoever was behind Q) actually “proved” to me that they were “in control” of our site in some fashion.
In fact, they actually did this SEVERAL TIMES. Here is what I posted after one of them.
While I am under no obligation to keep their “methods” secret in that regard, I choose to do so, so you’ll just have to take my word for it. They seemed to be watching everything we were doing at the time.
Back to the present.
We not only have to contend with hackers trying to come into our server from the outside – we have to contend with insiders in the back room at the server location.
At the time of my previous CALL TO PRAYER for our hosting company, that company began to notify customers that they had a “security problem” – which we all knew meant they had been hacked. The question was HOW BADLY.
During the last few weeks, I was notified that an email address was compromised. I don’t particularly care about that, because in the same way that people who have discovered the Kingdom of Heaven are excited about “things going there” (meaning they are not afraid of dying, and are “living for the Lord”), I’ve always lived with the “excitement” of my identity being revealed as one thrilling possible future. The deal there, is that this is a lot easier for me, than it is for thousands of other people, most of whom are on the other side.
What I’ve done, throughout my life on social media, is to tell all kinds of shock-and-awe stories – every one of them horribly true, down to the finest details – without giving enough details to make it obvious who I am, or who I was talking about. A lot of people in government obviously knew, but quite frankly, BOTH sides were well-served by keeping my identity concealed. The good guys learned a lot from my tales, the bad guys learned where they had been exposed, but since WE THE PEOPLE learned the most, the whole shebang evolved relentlessly toward what might be called “The Great Awakening”.
Sometimes, I tell people that I “mined” my social media with truth about the other side. I made my own secret identity something like a pin in a grenade. Pull it out, and bad things happen. Leave it in, and everybody muddles along, so both sides live to fight the next day.
The thing is, we are NOW getting to the point where the crimes of the other side which have been exposed by everybody else, are really approaching the size of MY OWN NUKES. There are all kinds of interesting futures now. I think there is more chance the other side will make more mistakes.
My feeling? Best to let GOD decide how this works out.
So – I’m not too concerned about what happens with me, but I AM concerned for our wonderful hosting company.
What happened to them is INTERESTING, and thanks to T3, I dug into it and found out that – TA DA!!! – I was right about state-level actors “in the back room” at our hosting company.
I am just going to give you a bunch of links, and then discuss this again without naming our hosting company.
The Daily Dot (leftist “scandal” rag – obviously not pushing anything I know!)
Most of this is just a kind of “fear porn” led by the left, including phonies like Ali Alexander, who are used to model fear reactions to good, honest, decent people. It’s all very “Alinsky”.
Just like the January Sixth bullshit, in the long run, this will be bad for the left and the derp state, and I will explain why in a bit.
One of the BEST parts, however, was the THIRD item revealed by the Daily Dot.
Now, I have not dug into this (as in finding and sifting through the data) to verify that we’re on the list of sites with subpoenas, but we certainly should be. The fact is, I am one of the few people I know for CERTAIN has subpoena-worthy stuff on a COUGHCOUGH.com-hosted site, including evidence of people with prior knowledge of the January Sixth “Buffalo Jump”. These are presumably people with FBI, CIA, Pentagon, or other government connections.
It was only a matter of time before BOTH sides would want to get as much information as they could, about what I knew. See, for example what I reported HERE…..
The Prelude: CUE THE MUSIC! The First Message: To all who may be locked out at this time PLEASE go to THE U TREE and post a comment – EVEN if it goes into moderation. I will get you out of moderation, and we will get you into here. This strategy has worked for everybody …
Thus, it’s very likely that SOMEBODY wants to know WHO has been monitoring our site, because it was only a matter of WEEKS after I revealed our knowledge of people having foreknowledge of the Buffalo Jump in November of 2020, that somebody made efforts to get people “in deep” where that data was. I was very impressed – those were very likely either “Team 1” or “Team 2” people who found it and got in there. It could have been NSA or CIA. It could have been Anonymous. But THAT was “back then” – long before the “main hack in question”.
Now, there are also the Gilead and Pfizer angles. We have been HARSH on both the mRNA vaccines AND remdesivir on this site.
“When the people have any power to object to a socialist solution, a deniable 5% fait accompli is always more desirable to socialists than a negotiated 50% solution, because they can always negotiate on the remaining 95%.” -Wolf Moon When I first heard about a case of a miscarriage by a pregnant doctor, due to …
I have been a poor and rotten servant of the Lord during my too long and too miserable life. I have made innocent women cry. I have led others astray. I have turned away from those in need in their time of need, and I have lied to myself and to God about why I …
These companies have a lot of money, and they have friends like China and Israel, to say nothing of China Joe Biden. These companies – or China – or Israel – could also be behind the Anonymous hack.
Yes, sadly, Israel has made a horrible mistake, IMO, to get in bed with crooks and con men, but that’s pretty much the state of things. When this site stands up for ISRAELIS being KILLED by the foolish jab, shame upon those who would try to stop us.
I would normally NEVER put Israel on the list of “usual suspects”, but at this point, you never know. They’ve gone total “vaczi”. Not as bad as the Aussies or the Euros, but BAD. The only reason we have not seen more brutality in Israel is the compliance, and the bad internal optics of beating the shit out of religious Jews.
It’s one thing to have Nazi health policies. It’s quite another to beat down Jews in Nazi style.
They have the same leftist, socialist, rogue IC, 4th branch, deep state problems that WE have.
Now – let’s talk about “Anonymous”.
Anonymous is the Oathkeepers of cyber.
Anonymous is CONTROLLED by the FBI.
I want you to understand that. “Anonymous” is NOT an independent hacker group. It was taken over by the FBI long ago, and now they “white knight” for the “black hat deep state”. Or maybe they “black knight”. Whatever. They are BUTT-BOYS of FBI.
It is VERY much like the Oathkeepers situation – a pied piper group – only more secret, so that FIB has more flexibility in how it uses Anonymous.
This is how the Biden administration attacked the right, after they got us all on Epik.
Yup. This is FIB creating plausible deniability for themselves to feed our information to THEIR left-wing attack dogs.
My advice?
Don’t be afraid. Be PISSED.
Things are going to get very interesting here.
LET THERE BE INTERESTING TIMES.
They will be MORE interesting for the other side. And in the long run, the Biden administration HACKING its enemies on Epik needs to be punished in the MINDS OF AMERICANS with disgust, righteous anger, and disrespect.
Fuck these assholes. We BLAME them, and we BLAME THEM until everybody thinks they’re SCUM.
A huge THANK YOU to Dr. Shiva and marymorse for discovering the path into what will be the most CYNICAL aspect of THE STEAL since they bragged about “fortifying the election”.
Indeed, “fortifying the election” was a “bragging clue” that they put right under our noses.
You see, that is EXACTLY how the scam worked.
They really DID “fortify” the election – as a way of TAKING IT DOWN.
Under the guise of “securing the election”, they actually CASED IT for the biggest theft in history.
There is only one Democrat so cynical in this world, to pull this stuff off, and his name is all over the crime scene.
But that’s getting ahead of the trail. Let me show you how I got here, thanks to Dr. Shiva, Professor Clement, and marymorse.
Doc Shiva Spots the Cynical Censorship
This is the crucial path in, so that you can SEE what I cannot now UNSEE.
Dr. Shiva, pursuing his censorship on Twitter in a way that actually got THREE TWITTER SNAKES to crawl out of that HELLHOLE called WilmerHale, discovered a cynical PLAYBOOK for suppressing not only people LIKE HIM, but in fact HIS OWN NAME – listed on the pages.
We covered this two days ago – plenty of background:
Think how cynical this is. A smart Indian guy – many think of him as a bit of a gadfly – versus some giant consortium of influential people, and HE is the “influence operation” that needs to be countered?
LMAO.
Seriously – WHAT A BUNCH OF SHIT. And they know it. Big, proud, rich, connected, important people, with all of our STOLEN retirement money and decades of medical insurance premiums robbed by Robbin’ Hood Obama – WORTHLESS after we got thrown onto Medicare – now buying their second and third McMansions with the money they stole – and THEY are afraid of HIM? HE is a threat?
Give me a break.
Yeah, he’s a threat like me, with my COVID lungs, my dead dog, and my broken and patched Chinese yard tools that I have to wait for a cool day to use so I don’t DIE of LONG CHINA VIRUS.
You ASSHOLES.
Anyway, Shiva dug through this site and mapped out the connections of the CENSORSHIP CARTEL.
V
V
V
V
But here is the most important thing to understand.
THE CENSORSHIP CARTEL IS JUST A SMALL WING OF THE ELECTION THEFT CARTEL.
And THAT is easier to see, thanks to Professor Clement.
The Vote Traffickers and WE THE UNTOUCHABLES
I used to think that the FBI was still like the Untouchables.
Eventually, I realized they weren’t.
Then I hoped that at least SOME of the FBI were still like the Untouchables.
Eventually, I realized that none of them were.
And the good ones? They DIED.
Remember Wall Street FBI investigator Sal Cincinelli? The guy who was investigating the Clinton Foundation?
The VOTE CARTEL put the squeeze on his sister and he ended up “killing himself”, shortly after giving an “invited talk” at the same place where Anthony Scaramucci did a 180 on Trump.
They are ROUGH and they PLAY ROUGH. They OWN guys like Wray and Comey.
WE ARE THE ONLY UNTOUCHABLES.
Just like Shiva. Ironic, isn’t it? “Untouchables.”
ANYWAY, here is the point. I did NOT see all of this correctly – the MAGNITUDE of it – until I watched Professor Clement describe the VOTE TRAFFICKERS as a CARTEL.
Once you get that, then FAST AND FURIOUS makes sense. It’s CARTEL TO CARTEL.
The CARTEL is already here.
If you have not heard this speech, you MUST hear it to get proper perspective.
Once you understand this – once you understand that even DRUG GANGS “case the cops” – then you are ready to “move on”.
You are now ready to see how a small player in the cartel SCREWED UP, and one of the UNTOUCHABLES found a record of her previous associates – including a VERY BIG FISH.
The Princess of Fake Elections
Jenna Griswold is a beautiful, indeed quintessential example of a “Soros DA”, as I like to call any sabotage candidate or appointee that George Soros backs.
Her incompetence for the job is a FEATURE – not a bug. The fact that such a surprise winner almost certainly had to be elected BY a fake election makes her the perfect defender OF fake elections.
This whole thing is HUGE. This Colorado SuperMom in the audience is DESTROYING Dominion, Jenna Griswold, and the DNC. The CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT. IT BURNS. It is very clear that this woman Jenna Griswold is an unqualified HACK who was put in BY FAKE ELECTIONS precisely for FAKE ELECTIONS and to protect FAKE ELECTIONS. I …
SO – when marymorse was perusing one of the cynical web pages at this horrible Belfer Center that was engaged in so much CENSORSHIP, who shows up but……
Yeah, there is that old “NASED” again. Remember? They were squelching any accusations of election fraud, when they went after Dr. Shiva.
So, it’s pretty clear that Jenna Griswold was involved with these same creeps at a very tight and high level.
L. Jean Camp and the mysterious Tea Leaves, (CIA???) for those who do not remember, are the computer scientists who said they found Russian bank commuter traffic to Trump tower.
In November 2016, just days before Donald Trump won the presidential election, Slate published what appeared to be an explosive story connecting his business empire to a prominent, Kremlin-linked bank in Moscow. The story, using breadcrumbs left across DNS, the esoteric global computer system that undergirds the internet, alleged a pattern of covert communications between a Trump Organization email server and Alfa Bank….
…In May of this year, the bank tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP, a white-shoe American law firm, to write a letter to L. Jean Camp, an esteemed Indiana University computer scientist and researcher — and a vocal supporter of the claims made by Tea Leaves. This initial letter, first reported by CNN, claimed that the Camp investigation into the covert server chatter had “encouraged inquiries into supposed links to the Trump organization” and that her “activities continue to this day to promote an unwarranted investigation into Alfa Bank’s ‘communication’ with the Trump Organization.” The letter added that “Alfa Bank is exploring all available options to protect itself … [including] litigation and causes of action under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act,” further demanding that Camp “preserve all records” pertaining to the Tea Leaves research. Such a preservation request is often the precursor to a lawsuit. There would be more letters.
Alfa’s lawyers went beyond scary lawyer boilerplate, demanding that Camp not only turn over all of her related communications with members of the media, but also divulge her full correspondence with the anonymous Tea Leaves, presumably for the purpose of unmasking and pursuing them. As a professor at a publicly funded university, Camp’s official correspondence is subject to public disclosure. A subsequent letter from Kirkland & Ellis made this threat explicit….
I have to publish what I have NOW, and come back to finish it later, but by now you should be able to see what is going on.
This is why I’m having you download pages from the Belfer Center, so they can’t TORCH THE EVIDENCE.
THIS RIGHT HERE is the key – where the “security experts” come in, call everything safe, STEAL THE KEYS, GET THE LEVERAGE, and EXECUTE THE STEAL.
SLICK. Very, very SLICK.
Thank you, marymorse. Thank you, Professor Clement. Thank you, Mike Lindell. Thank you, Tina Peters.
And thank you, Jenna Griswold. YOU gave us the keys.
To the Belfer Center.
W
UPDATE 1 – Why Is Arapahoe County Important?
OK – this is big. Check out the video in the first comment, from Gail – this is the one where Jenna Griswold goes in front of the media and shakes perceptibly, as noted by Professor Clements, the former prosecutor.
Who is the FIRST person she calls in for defense? County Clerk (former) of ARAPAHOE COUNTY, and now head of the Colorado Association of County Clerks.
You will note that Arapahoe County is the EXACT SAME one country (other than Denver) that took part in the “Event 201 of elections” BS. I repeat the image:
Did you see that? Arapahoe County is the THIRD most populous county in Colorado. In fact, let’s take a look at the TOP 15 county populations there. I chose 15 for a reason.
The second-largest county, El Paso County, is Colorado Springs. I am guessing that it’s somewhat redder than Denver and Boulder. Arapahoe County looks like it SHOULD be “suburban red” – but with pretexts like the MK shoot-em-up at Columbine High School, I am thinking the Vote Trafficking Cartel could swing things BELIEVABLY to the DonkeyComs.
In my opinion, if they can control voting machines in both Denver County and Arapahoe County, they can control the STATE. They don’t have to have everybody on board. They can nickel and dime everybody else.
Notice also that Mesa County, at number 15, is STILL a six-digit population, at a bit less than 1/4 of the population of Arapahoe County. So it still matters, and we SHOULD SEE cheating in the logs and PCAPs.
It would be important to have lots of leverage on Arapahoe County election offices and officials. I won’t get into all the possible ways that leverage might occur, outside of what we are seeing with the Belfer Center partnership, but in my opinion they used this relationship to snoop on what was needed to manipulate the voting machines, and to influence the people in Arapahoe County election supervision into predictable and desired behaviors.
I am guessing that Arapahoe, with a lot of growth AND fluid population, would be the perfect place for a REALLY BIG, FAT credit line of FAKE VOTES, FAKE REGISTRATIONS, and [DRUMROLL] FAKE CITIZENS.
Yes. FAKE CITIZENS is where the real scam is. It has to be. To keep registrations looking natural, there have to be FAKE CITIZENS.
The CENSUS is FILLED with FAKE CITIZENS.
How do I know this? SOON.
The scandal of UniParty dominance through Fake Elections is HUGE.
Now – note that they are operating by a PLAYBOOK – a PLAYBOOK that provides COVER – the cover of phony “election security” when what they are really doing is COVERING UP election fraud.
This is how these playbooks work. Just like the playbook for dealing with “malign influence and misinformation” is how they deal with BREAKOUT OF INFORMATION OR EVIDENCE about election fraud perpetrated BY THEM, so they use phony concerns about cyber-security to cover up DIRTY ELECTION COP activities.
You seeing how this works? These people are DIRTY AS HELL.
More coming.
Update 2 – The Belfer Archives
Because we are bringing the HEAT to these corrupt Democrat NGOs, there WILL be cover-up. Hence, we’ve archived many pages of this nasty Mookish cheat-protecting DNC cadre operation. Many thanks to TheseTruths for helping me do this. Just look through this Orwellian elite blamecasting crap at your leisure. If they scrub it, it will only evidence consciousness of guilt. CRIMINALS!
Seriously, you CHUMPS on the academic end of this travesty. Robby MOOK? You let that partisan TOAD sully the Harvard name by turning it into a DNC OP? Much worse, a FRAUD OP? LOL! “So smart, they’re STUPID.”
Again, I’d like to thank TheseTruths for helping me collect all these pages of evidence. It’s already very clear to me by reading these titles, just how much Robby Mook and his DNC cohorts were able to LAUNDER Democrat narratives and abuses through Harvard University. SHAME!
Featured Photo: Meeting of the War Crimes Executive Committee, which decided on the arrangements for the Nuremberg trials. Note the garage pull in the background – Exhibit F1b.
I am dying of the China Virus. I had the virus itself in the latter half of January, 2020. I became symptomatic on January 18, and thus working backwards by 5 days, I estimate that I got it on January 13 – either from friends who had traveled internationally, or from documents they carried which had been handled by Iranians. I’ll never really know.
The only other person at that meeting who got the China Virus was my wife, who did not get it at the meeting, but later. It is likely that she got it from me on roughly January 19 or 20, given that she became symptomatic around the 24th or 25th.
My wife passed it to one other person, who passed it to their spouse, and that seems to have been the end of our chain.
For various reasons – otherwise known as comorbidities – I suffered hypoxia and lung damage, whereas my wife did not – nor did those who got it from her. Nevertheless, she does seem to have milder chronic effects such as peripheral pain and clotting issues, which could be related to the virus. Strangely, her prior problem with nose bleeds has vanished.
My wife’s symptoms were otherwise identical to mine except for hypoxia and lung damage. Both of us had the same “dry cough”, mild fever, exhaustion, weird headache and kidney aches, etc. She was also taking vitamin D for osteoporosis therapy – I was only taking a multivitamin with a low dose of vitamin D. I highly recommend vitamin D to prevent severe China Virus symptoms. I believe that it spared my wife.
My chronic symptoms are interesting. They are mostly cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and pulmonary. You may learn more about them later in this article. I have some highly diagnostic clotting issues as well, which are specifically known to be RISKS for the coronavirus vaccines.
It is inadvisable for either me or my wife to take a coronavirus vaccine, given that I already have excellent immunity, the “clot shots” appear to degrade that immunity, and recoverees are 2 or 3 more likely to have side effects from “the jab”. That, in addition to my specific contraindications.
You will understand shortly that it would be MURDER to give me a coronavirus vaccine. It would also be MURDER to give my wife one. And to give one to a child, is going to be SCANDALOUS MURDER of the worst kind.
Consequently, I consider all people who want to give me, my wife, or anybody else, a coronavirus vaccine, as MURDERERS.
I do not consider such people, who would mandate a murderous injection – this really bad vaccine – to be much better than the CCP, the Nazis, or the Soviets.
So maybe by now you are STILL wondering – what is this “Nuremberg II” all about? Glad you asked.
My Nuremberg Wake-Up Call – Stew Peters
This tweet from Stew Peters, which I saw on Gab, really resonated with me.
During the Nuremberg Trials, even the media was prosecuted and put to death for lying to the public.
He’s not lying – I can show you pictures from the Nuremberg Trials.
Since Stew might get bounced from Lying Twitter any time, I save the above tweet as an image.
The only problem is that we ONLY prosecuted National Socialist Lying Press. We did NOT arrest Bolshevik Socialist Lying Press, who started the whole thing, by driving Germany INSANE.
My mother knew the Nazis as a child and a teenager. She dodged through their crazy system, growing up, doing whatever she needed to do, not to be killed. She had so many strikes against her, if anybody knew ALL OF THEM, she was as good as dead. Very few people knew ANY of her strikes. Only she and her family knew all of them. The family kept the most dangerous strike secret. You can now understand why my mother thought that FAMILY is so important.
My mother was classified as “racially impure”. That was not a death sentence – but if combined with other bureaucratic criteria, it could be. She was half-American – part American Indian – and her German side was “not pristine”. Her grandfather, still the family patriarch, was a Mason, but apparently had enough connections or excuses not to be arrested.
My mother was not brave like Sophie Scholl, the college student who was killed by Hitler for printing pamphlets criticizing the Nazis and their war crimes. No – my mother was a survivor. A very cunning one, cowardly one moment – brave the next, who stayed one step ahead of the Gestapo by learning to LIE her way through the system.
But what my mother DID do was to serve as a WITNESS TO HISTORY. She saw the Holocaust, and how REAL it was. She saw horrible things that she told me in great detail – so that SOMEBODY would remember.
Polish survivor Jadwiga Dzido shows her scarred leg to the court, while expert witness Dr. Alexander explains the nature of the medical experiment performed on her in the Ravensbrueck concentration camp. Dzido and Alexander were appearing as witnesses at the Doctors Trial.
The experiments were performed by defendants Herta Oberheuser and Fritz Ernst Fischer, on November 22, 1942.
Medical Socialism
In the 1970’s, I remember being in a car, laughing hysterically with a Jewish friend, smoking cigarettes, driving home from college, joking about the weird, occasional, bizarre, seemingly mentally ill “health nazis” who talked about regulating smoking and junk food. We knew this idiocy they dreamed of would never happen – COULD never happen. This was AMERICA. This shit does not happen in AMERICA. MAYBE in Russia. Definitely not in America.
Have another COKE! No Diet Coke here. Plenty of sugar for plenty of energy!
Banning smoking? BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Good one!
What’s next? Sugar? HAHAHAHAHAHA! Hilarious! These health nazis. They’re CRAZY.
Oh, my goodness. I was such a fool. I could NOT make the connection to my mother.
My mother’s big, deadly secret was a horribly deformed back, with one God-given blessing. It looked absolutely normal with clothes on.
She had learned over her lifetime to keep it a secret. She always dressed in the closet, with her back away from the door. I only saw it ONCE, by a combination of accidents, when, as an adult, she made the mistake of walking out of the closet to speak with my father, not having shut the bedroom door completely, not knowing I was still in the house, and I turned and looked through the slightly open door.
I was utterly shocked. It looked like something from the films Alien or Species.
My mother hid it through the entire Nazi nightmare, except when she was forced into one examination. The doctor saw her back – as he moved around her next to the wall – but he lied to the nurse and said she was fine.
There WERE good people – but they had to pick and choose the exact right moments to ACT AGAINST THE MACHINE.
And I’m here to tell you, EARLIER IS BETTER.
Here is how bad medicine got in Nazi Germany.
Between September 1939 and April 1945 the defendants Karl Brandt, Blome, Brack, and Hoven unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly committed war crimes, as defined by Article II of Control Council Law No. 10, in that they were principals in, accessories to, ordered, abetted, took a consenting part in, and were connected with plans and enterprises involving the execution of the so-called “euthanasia” program of the German Reich in the course of which the defendants herein murdered hundreds of thousands of human beings, including nationals of German-occupied countries. This program involved the systematic and secret execution of the aged, insane, incurably ill, of deformed children, and other persons, by gas, lethal injections, and diverse other means in nursing homes, hospitals, and asylums. Such persons were regarded as “useless eaters” and a burden to the German war machine. The relatives of these victims were informed that they died from natural causes, such as heart failure. German doctors involved in the “euthanasia” program were also sent to Eastern occupied countries to assist in the mass extermination of Jews.
Now, this “euthanasia” part is just the extreme. We see SIGNS of this, like Cuomo and his health people deliberately infecting nursing homes, but we are not realizing that much of the DAY-TO-DAY COVID CRAP is actually quite NAZI.
HERE is a lady, still alive who remembers ALL of what we are seeing now, happening under the Nazis. (Hat Tip to Singingsoul for finding this for me. I had remembered seeing videos of her before, but had forgotten her name.)
Just listen to her. She looks at COVID COMMIES, and she sees COVID NAZIS.
Are you starting to see how bad of a situation we are in?
I need to talk about why – if you don’t want to be like me – you don’t want the jab.
The Clot Shot
What I’m going to show you here is REMARKABLE.
On the bright side, this Twitter thread EXPLAINS my China Virus case PERFECTLY. It explains every aspect of my cardiovascular and pulmonary symptoms. But why? It’s not about the virus – it’s about the vaccine.
Yes. Even though it’s about the VACCINE, it’s about the SPIKE PROTEIN – the CLOT PROTEIN – something that my case and the CLOT SHOT have in common.
But on the bad side – yeah. It’s VERY bad health news for a lot of us.
But on the good/bad side, it’s enough to send ANYBODY who advocates mandatory vaccination to a TRIBUNAL followed by PRISON or EXECUTION.
Seriously. THIS NEWS is all the justification needed for ANY non-Nazi portion of our military to begin arresting the COVID NAZIS who are pushing vaccination mandates, if they don’t STOP.
Vaccine mandates must stop immediately.
We need to LEARN from failure – NOT keep pushing it.
Time to explain.
Hang onto your testicles. It’s a hell of a trip.
(1) Pfizer vaccine causes HUGE (5-6X) reduction in the most important antibodies, while jacking up the “addiction antibodies” which FAIL on the next variant (are you starting to see how the addiction works?)
(2) EVERY recipient of the Pfizer vaccine is excreting the remnants of PEG in urine, most likely from the “pegylated graphene oxide” trade secret (molecular razor blades, absolutely unreal they used this shit).
(3) The “clot shot” isn’t just some recipients – it turns out that tests shows clotting is happening in MOST people getting the spike protein vaccines. They’re not BIG clots that are easily spotted – they’re small clots that need testing to show up.
(4) This is the clinical effect of the clots from the vaccines, and it is IDENTICAL to what the disease did to me. It causes lung damage not visible on X-rays, and that damage stresses the heart by pulmonary hypertension. The good news from my own experience is that PULMONARY VASODILATORS (like magnesium) are VERY HELPFUL.
(5) More boosters = more clots = more damage = faster death. The vaccines MUST be stopped. If Pfizer wants to redeem itself (remember – Nuremberg II), it needs to STOP VACCINE PRODUCTION and FIND PULMONARY ANTIHYPERTENSIVES AND VASODILATORS.
(6) Here you see the worsening with the third booster. I predicted this – ask people on this blog. I told people – DO NOT GET THE THIRD SHOT. That is where this goes fentanyl-level and you’re not gonna last. Anybody who keeps pushing vaccines and mandates, and that includes SECDEF, needs to be ARRESTED, knowing what we know now.
The chief epidemiologist in Iceland was CORRECT when he said we have to transition to NATURAL HERD IMMUNITY. Yes – he was CORRECT, until the LYING PRESS browbeat him into the INSANITY NARRATIVE.
He was RIGHT before he was “corrected by the socialist media” – which happens to science all the time now.
We have to catch it early, treat it, survive it, and have great immunity.
1/ Stunning news from Iceland – among the world’s most vaccinated countries – today.
Facing a huge new #Covid outbreak that translates into ~100,000 new US cases a day, the country’s chief epidemiologist now says natural infection is the only way to reach herd immunity… pic.twitter.com/eMEnJxkWYk
2/ And he is not going to propose more lockdowns or widespread boosters. They do want to vaccinate teens but they are getting pushback. From an Icelandic reader (as you can see, the articles back him).
What is so stunning about this is that a couple of weeks ago, as cases began to rise, Iceland looked to be going the opposite way and imposing a new wave of restrictions in the hope of bolstering vaccine effectiveness. Clearly they've recognized that strategy is impossible.
So why did the Iceland epidemiologist walk it back?
That takes us to our next two items.
Why are CDC and its Pawns Always Wrong or Lying?
Beyond the fact that Rochelle Walensky is a Tony Fauci crony from WAY BACK, there is something terribly wrong with CDC.
In my opinion, it is politicized to the point where it obeys some weird agenda that it either does not itself understand, or that it does understand and NUREMBERG II is needed.
Just listen to this front line doctor, who is trained in respiratory viruses and immunology, explain how the agency repeatedly contradicts what is KNOWN and LONG-ESTABLISHED SCIENCE about treating and vaccinating against viral infections. He does NOT mince words. He sees CDC lying, just like I do.
Go to 14:55 to hear him begin, after the initial 15 minutes of the meeting (video MAY start there).
Let me put it this way.
It is important to follow the SCIENCE of PRACTICED MEDICINE and NOT the POLITICS of CDC, or the STOCK VALUE of PFIZER.
This is exactly what I found when “global warming” was forced on the entire scientific community. The “authorities” were repeatedly WRONG, but were never removed from authority for their errors.
Politics does NOT make science work. Politics DESTROYS SCIENCE.
Now – here is where the media comes in.
The Media’s Responsibility
What we have seen is the opposite of the way the media used to function when it was healthy.
The media used to ask tough questions of EVERYBODY – their OWN questions – NOT questions to support today’s talking points of ONE PARTY.
The media was not so obviously driven by AGENDA. The MEDIA did not tell scientists what to think – especially politically preferred science that was either failing or wrong to begin with. The media followed the SCIENCE – and the SCIENCE followed the TRUTH by painful argument and contradictions of its own beliefs.
SCIENCE fought and MEDIA reported.
SCIENCE worked and MEDIA reported.
The media is different now.
The media:
pushes a narrative that is repeatedly WRONG
does not want to pursue certain truths
hounds politicians, experts, authorities, and others who don’t offer approved viewpoints
seems to serve corporate and leftist political interests
The media will have much to answer for, if it KEEPS PUSHING MANDATES for MURDEROUS VACCINES.
So – where does this all go?
Conclusion: Keep It Up, and It’s WAR.
Pushing these vaccines any further is CAUSE FOR WAR for the American People. It’s that simple.
The insane left in America has been fed a real line by RevCom, with their “Bash a Fash” Antifa nonsense, farmed out to leftist youth, and aimed quite absurdly at the normal Americans who overwhelmingly chose Donald Trump against off-the-charts cheating.
The stark TRUTH is that American Bolsheviks of all stripes are pushing and pushing a DYING BRAND, and with the help of this damnable Maoist virus, they have created MEDICAL NAZISM, pushed by a LEFTIST controlled media, and supported by corporate globalists who don’t give a rat’s ass about patients – only about political power, profits, and CONTROL.
It’s one thing to pump a drug like Remdesivir that was basically a loser, but could have been regarded as a “hope-builder” of sorts.
It essentially does nothing but get cash for its makers, but at least it does no harm.
Original Investigation Infectious Diseases
July 15, 2021
Association of Remdesivir Treatment With Survival and Length of Hospital Stay Among US Veterans Hospitalized With COVID-19
Michael E. Ohl, MD, MSPH1,2; Donald R. Miller, ScD3,4; Brian C. Lund, PharmD1; et alTakaaki Kobayashi, MD1,2; Kelly Richardson Miell, PhD1; Brice F. Beck, MA1; Bruce Alexander, PharmD1; Kristina Crothers, MD5,6; Mary S. Vaughan Sarrazin, PhD1,2
Question: Is remdesivir treatment associated with improved survival or shortened hospitalizations among people with COVID-19 in routine care settings?
Findings: In this cohort study of 2344 US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir therapy was not associated with improved 30-day survival but was associated with a significant increase in median time to hospital discharge.
Meaning: The findings suggest that routine use of remdesivir may be associated with increased use of hospital beds but not with improvements in survival.
Abstract
Importance Randomized clinical trials have yielded conflicting results about the effects of remdesivir therapy on survival and length of hospital stay among people with COVID-19.
NOT SO THIS SNAKE-VENOM VACCINE
In my opinion, it is MURDER to try to make anybody take this vaccine involuntarily.
But it gets worse.
Pushing the vaccines drives the China Virus to new levels of pathogenicity. We have been warned repeatedly about this – even by an advisor to Bill Gates’ own pet organization CEPI – and yet it’s full steam ahead.
This is literally unconscionable. It’s not just murder – it’s MASS MURDER.
This is not acceptable.
So I am warning all proponents of mandatory vaccination.
You are headed to literal war, and from there, to only one place.
Nuremberg II.
Please reconsider before it’s too late.
Millions of Americans are ready to do the right thing. AGAIN.
Thanks to Cthulhu, we were warned EARLY about Apple’s surveillance plans.
Sounds very innocent, right? I will explain exactly why this is not. This is INCIPIENT POLITICAL SPYING AND PRETEXT FOR ARREST.
“But it’s for the CHILDREN!”
You remember the last people on the left who used that line to “save children”?
THEY’RE BACK.
Apple can no longer be trusted, and they are accelerating their deployment of surveillance technology to serve the LEFT at a breakneck pace. Even by my Suspicious Cat standards, it is an ALARMING speed.
In my opinion their spying software is already a DONE DEAL and it’s READY TO DEPLOY.
They have very likely been alpha testing it on people already.
I just got an email from Apple, inviting me to help beta test iOS 15.
You want to know what I think of that?
NO. F***ING. WAY.
But it gets worse. It’s not just the fact that it’s ready, and they will not be talked out of it.
It’s not just WHY they’re doing it, which is why they will not be talked out of it.
It’s that they are lying about everything. And I will explain.
My advice to everybody……
GTFO!!!
Apple is NOT the Same Old Apple
Apple today is not the Apple of Steve Jobs. This should be fairly obvious to everybody. I think Jobs had some kind of understanding of why Apple needed to avoid being equated with leftism.
The problem is that the true keys to the empire all really belonged to Steve Jobs. When he handed the company over to a man who would ultimately betray half of Apple’s customers, Apple was done. The only question was how long Apple would take to fully betray ALL of its customers, and for those customers to REALIZE IT.
Now would be a good time to join those who can see the betrayal.
I never trusted Tim Cook when he said that Apple was dedicated to privacy. There was a part of me that wanted to believe that line, but I can say now with no reservation, that part is a CHUMP. I slap that part and say WAKE THE F*** UP.
Tim Cook is a political animal. And his political friends are not nice people. Not if you are US.
So how did Hillary World convince Tim Cook to abandon what principles he might have had?
Theory: It’s All About January Sixth
Influencing the influencers is old hat.
Influencing the people who HOST the influencers is where it’s at.
So influencing Tim Cook to break his pledge on privacy MATTERED. It was USEFUL – incredibly useful.
One of the real advantages of Nancy Pelosi’s little SCAM on January Sixth was the shock value for Democrats.
Part of what shocked Democrats was the fact that – yeah, in their heart of hearts they know – Biden didn’t win.
They were, however, OK with that bogus victory, as long as it didn’t lead to problems for them.
If Trump supporters would have had a nice, peaceful, but very loud rally at the Capitol, the Dems would have lost a HUGE portion of mindshare on the stolen election. Many more Democrats would have thought – deep down – “Yeah. No way Biden won.”
The Dems couldn’t have that. So they faked attacks inside, provoked the crowd outside, and their plants began breaking windows and doors to bring in the CHUMPS.
One of the best results for Mafia Nan and Chris Wray was this. It SCARED the Democrats and RINOs.
I personally think that Tim Cook was brought to a state where he literally FEARED an actual “insurrection”. That fear was useful, and all Cook’s half-hearted lip service to “privacy” just DIED.
Now – I do know that Apple iPhones and Apple iCloud were used by Dodge and FIB to go after “insurrectionists” in the days after January Sixth. That happened very quickly and without the slightest pushback from Apple.
I knew at that point that Apple could not be trusted. And so I just waited for confirmation that Apple has completely gone over to the dark side.
Well, we have that now.
Apple’s Alibi
On August 5, Ars Technica (or Arse Technocratica, as I like to call them) produced some only mildly critical reporting on Apple’s move.
That link is worth reading, if you plan to read nothing else.
Now – without getting into the details of it (they’re very technical), the discussion is basically about HOW Apple plans to check for “certain pictures” on people’s phones. Apple gives a very skeletal but seemingly exact and assuring description of their process, and basically says “don’t worry about it – nobody at Apple will be looking at your photos – they’re still private.”
I can only begin to tell you how much of a lie this is.
First of all, you are assuming that Apple is telling you the truth. It’s very HARD to throw what they say out completely, and not believe them AT ALL, and be fully skeptical, and make them “prove their way” back into trust, but that is really what you need to do.
So I want you to TRY – even though it’s difficult – to just say…..
“HMMM – MAYBE APPLE IS LYING ABOUT SOMETHING HERE.”
See? Much easier. Just open yourself to the possibility that Apple – wonderful Apple – might just be pushing a WEE FIB on us.
Now – before I get into MY criticisms, I’m going to present a few other people who have been critical, just so that you understand – this is not just Wolf – this is a LOT of people.
Here is an “Apple world follower” article in iPhone Hacks. This one really shows all aspects of the “it’s for the CHILDREN” psychological operation.
Apple’s Plan to Scan iCloud Photos Met with Backlash; Internal Memo Promises to Address Concerns
It’s not every day that Tim Cook goes Bill Clinton “for the CHILLDRUN” and you get comments like this:
No matter how well-intentioned, @Apple is rolling out mass surveillance to the entire world with this. Make no mistake: if they can scan for kiddie porn today, they can scan for anything tomorrow.
They turned a trillion dollars of devices into iNarcs—*without asking.* https://t.co/wIMWijIjJk
And given that Twitter is so bad now, let’s save that Tweet as an image.
What Snowden is saying is EXACTLY what I thought when I read the Ars Technica article. Snowden knows capabilities from the inside. I know them from the outside. He is exactly right, IMO.
The criticisms of EFF.org (Electronic Frontier Foundation), one of the biggest and most important privacy advocates, are mentioned in this same article, but they are better seen on the EFF website.
Now, I don’t particularly like this explanation by EFF, because MY ANALYSIS, knowing how Democrat lies work, shows that the situation is far, far worse than just some “back door” into your phone.
This is ROUTINE SURVEILLANCE BUILT IN.
EFF, mostly the good liberal sheep that they are, don’t understand that the situation is FAR WORSE than what they think is there. They are essentially being LULL BOTS in this context.
They’re “friends of Democrats” wringing their hands and going “I’m not so sure about this”.
They have NO IDEA how much worse things really are. And I’ll explain that shortly.
Let’s move on now, to 9 to 5 Mac, which shills hard FOR the new Apple “features”.
Normally, one would not think there might be a need to archive any article in ComputerWorld, but quite bluntly, we live in extraordinary times.
Removal of speech by either AUTHOR or AUTHORITIES is a SECOND WORLD PROBLEM, and that is exactly where we are going.
But check out that statement. It’s the BOTTOM LINE.
“Once you scan for one thing, you can scan for anything.”
I find it HIGHLY IRONIC that the other side LEVERAGED their own child trafficking against us here, but yeah. They did.
THAT is Democrat evil.
They even nailed a substantial fraction of the Q army this way, because – and I’m being blunt but kind – too many were in it ONLY because of the fight against pedophiles. Many (not all, but many) of those folks are SO single-minded, they are quite ready to throw away the Constitution if they hear the right buzzwords like “FOR THE CHILDREN”.
Yeah, think about it. You will NOT hear a peep out of many of the “BUT IT’S CHILDREN” crowd.
Now – let’s get down to a very meaty criticism of what Apple is doing.
This is VERY analogous to Kary Mullis warning about the ABUSE of PCR testing.
What if what Apple is doing GIVES WAY MORE FALSE POSITIVES THAN THEY ARE ADMITTING?
Yes – read that article, because THAT is where we realize that this is just one more INTENTIONAL BOTCH like the PCR tests.
You starting to see how dangerous this is?
It gets worse.
The thing that shocks me most can be described by creating an analogy.
Watch closely.
“We, the FBI, needs to catch terrorists and drug cartels laundering money. We also need to catch financial criminals. But unlike Wall Street professionals, we’re not experts in these financial matters. Likewise, we need to catch cybercriminals, and we’re good, but we’re not the best. Not like people who do this for a living.”
“Therefore, we would like to let two contractors be the ones who upload the data that we’ll be looking for. It’s very harmless – the FBI will not be involved in looking at people’s financial data or their cyber behavior. Instead, we will use hashes – encrypted numerical data for the suspect transactions and internet packets – supplied directly from our two respected expert contractors, Fusion GPS and Crowdstrike.”
Do you see it now?
It is PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY for Apple, and ACCESS FOR CONTRACTORS.
The first contractors will be unknown (to us) experts in going after child pornography.
ONLY if they find something that is approved by Wokesters at Apple, will the FBI be called in.
I’m gonna be blunt. I don’t TRUST the FBI that this guy was really a child pornography suspect. What if they “trumped up” a charge against him?
I mean, they did it to a sitting President of the United States. Why not some average patriot?
And those contractors could be anybody. What’s to prevent them from harassing – from SWATTING – a guy like Andrew Torba, who they HATE?
And what if they expand this stuff to HATE SPEECH and HATE MEMES?
Who would the contractors be?
ADL?
SPLC?
Who’s next?
Next, it could be BLM.
Next, it could be those “Antifa profs”.
Next, it could be those “QAnon experts”.
No, my friends. This all goes to a VERY bad place.
AND IT GETS WORSE.
I have reasons to believe that Apple is actually LYING about the technology they want to put on our phones.
I think that the lies go beyond things like HIDING the “GARBAGE IN, GARBAGE OUT” (GIGO) risks of using third-party contractors who were in NO WAY approved by us or responsible to us.
BECAUSE APPLE IS INDEED HIDING THOSE RISKS.
According to the author above, Apple lied about the success of their algorithms.
Hell – I think they’re lying about the algorithms, too. I think they’re misleading us as to how the process actually works. I think they’re making VERY nondeterministic stuff sound very deterministic, and it’s not.
The following mistake is illustrative of BAD ROBOT MATCHES.
This is ROBOTS, on our phones, SPYING ON US. BADLY.
Robots that will be pretty much “EUA quality” – experimenting ON US.
Sound familiar?
No. Just NO.
Here’s my bottom line.
I am getting rid of Apple completely. It’s GONE. Scrubbed. History.
The ONLY way I’m keeping my Apple devices is if Tim Cook retires or is FIRED.
That’s it. He cannot be trusted. He has WRECKED Apple.
And they’re not smart enough to fire that guy, so BYE-BYE, APPLE.
Not only is this treatment utterly unconstitutional – it’s disingenuous as hell.
None of these people are flight risks – unlike every left-wing domestic terrorist of the 1960s and 1970s, like Obama’s buddy, Bill Ayers.
There is NO REASON to hold them. NONE.
Meanwhile, violent ANTIFA felons who seriously injure police and innocent citizens are released on their own recognizance in communist blue states, but non-violent PROTESTERS in red states are being arrested by FBI teams with assault weapons and then transferred to a HELL-HOLE in Washington, where they are beaten by BLM racists and held indefinitely.
No.
Just. Say. NO.
It’s THAT simple.
Make KAPO GARLAND prove that he’s actually being fair, because we all know he’s a dirty judge, and he’s NOT FAIR.
Democrats are fakers, scammers, and con artists of the highest order. If you THINK they are doing something stupid, you had best reevaluate – they are almost certainly doing something EVIL and covering it up with something that’s merely stupid.
The above is AUBERGINE’S RAZOR – a wonderful formulation by QTreeper Aubergine of my earlier RANT against Hanlon’s Razor.
a guest post by our dear house guardian Suspicious Cat NOTE FROM WOLF: This post may require some explanation. After allowing my somewhat mythical and somewhat not mythical sister Fox Moon to have her guest post, our dear pet Suspicious Cat has demanded to have his post, too.You see, Suspicious Cat considers himself to be …
Hanlon’s razor is the old saw, behind which Democrats hide, that says, more or less, to never attribute to malice what can be attributed to incompetence or stupidity. Under some circumstances, that may be reasonable, but “never” is utterly WRONG and DANGEROUS, and in my opinion makes Hanlon’s razor a “false aphorism” designed to protect the smartly wicked.
In considering HOW Democrats fool us, I just had a wonderful realization about ONE MORE WAY in which they do it – by following a kind of twisted form of a MAGIC ACT.
A magic act has THREE parts. The PLEDGE. The TURN. And the PRESTIGE.
First, let’s see how this is used in magic – from a truly great movie – THE PRESTIGE.
Thus, there are THREE PARTS to a magic act.
The Pledge – something ordinary but now suspect is offered for inspection
The Turn – something extraordinary happens to the pledged object
The Prestige – an even more confounding return of the pledged object happens
Now one can leave off the prestige, but this is most often done as a SERIES of pledges and turns, CAPPED at the end by a very dramatic prestige.
In the Democrat game, however, the PRESTIGE is replaced by the GOTCHA.
The GOTCHA is critical. It disappears ONLY if some rascal in the audience calls it out before we’re deep in the TURN.
The PLEDGE is also shrewder than in a magic act. It is offered as REALITY – not as a possible trick. It can be offered coyly, or brazenly, but it is always offered innocently.
The TURN is offered seductively, to bait the mark fully into it.
The Pledge – some typical Democrat scam is offered, brazenly or innocently, but deceivingly
The Turn – something unexpected happens to the Democrat scam
The Gotcha – something even WORSE happens because of the turn
A perfect example of this was NanXi’s trap for Deplorables on January 6.
The Pledge – Deplorables can protest the bad electors at Capitol Hill! Really! Stop The Steal!
The Turn – Fake MAGA and FBI informants create a phony riot on Capitol Hill! But no fair!
The Gotcha – Treasonous FIB chases hoodwinked Deplorables down as “insurrectionists”
The TRICK here is to always make the SUCKER go too deeply into THE TURN. You HAVE to be careful. Democrats will always try to lure us too deeply into the Turn. It’s our job not to go there.
NOW – the reason I’m cautioning here, is because I am very suspicious of this bullshit about three Texas Democrats who flew on a plane without masks, thereby getting COVID.
I’m sorry – this is not passing the Wolf Smell Test.
THIS.
JUST.
SOUNDS.
LIKE.
PLEDGE.
AND.
TURN.
Let’s look at this sucker closely.
THE PLEDGE – Democrats perform a typical dastardly Democrat deed that draws attention from all the fist-shaking MAGA. The outrage! It burns!
THE TURN – Great and WONDERFUL KARMA befalls those DASTARDLY DEMS – provided we accept all of the following:
Democrats are honest and really told us the truth
Dems have NO motive in bragging up stupidity leading to COVID KARMA
A bunch of mask Karen Dems wore NOT A SINGLE MASK on that plane by random chance
PCR tests worked GREAT and didn’t give us some false or “on-demand” positives by being cooked too long
Vaccines are not working because of some Democrat propaganda reason – for example – that the “unvaccinated are infecting the vaccinated” – their latest bullshit
sick and exposed Dems now have a legitimate reason not to come back into legislative session
Do you see how this works? That last one – THAT is just the CLINCHER for me.
Already, going into the TURN, things are looking SKETCHY. Just like they did to me on January Sixth.
WOLF and SUSPICIOUS CAT for the WIN.
SO – what would be next?
THE GOTCHA – Democrats use these three cases – to which we have “pledged” – as propaganda mills.
For example:
all three say that they didn’t have bad symptoms, credit the vaccine, and then justify vaccines as “preventing hospitalization and death”
all three claim it’s the horrible dangerous delta variant that must be stopped
Democrats say this proves that masks work, and demand remasking by CHUMPS like DeWine
Joe Biden and Facebook conclude their phony fake wrestling act with DRACONIAN censorship
Are y’all seeing how this works?
For a cheap fake hit on Dems, we PLEDGED LIKE CHUMPS.
Democrats NEVER give us this kind of easy victory unless there is a huge defeat for us, waiting behind it.
