Dear KMAG 20241211

NOTE FROM WOLF

Gail Combs is still having intermittent trouble both editing and posting on WordPress. This is her draft, fixed up and key-worded as best as I could, on short notice.

W


Gail Combs:

At first I was going to do a round-up of all of POTUS Trump’s picks via screen shots and then realized it would be WAY too long. Also the images would eat up too much time loading and possibly overwhelm Steve’s internet service. Therefore I am going to delve into some of the concerns raised. (If people are interested I can do the Trump picks as a separate article or possibly series of article to chronicle this Historic Post Election period.)

Given the skuttlebutt about Biden pardons, this maybe of interest:

Protect Democracy Org — Checking the Pardon Power: Constitutional Limitations & Options for Preventing Abuse

Note: Protect Democracy promotes the Committee for Safe and Secure Elections (CSSE) – InfluenceWatch 

CSSE was established in June 2022 by members of the William J. Brennan Center for Justice, the Elections GroupProtect Democracy, and the R Street Institute.

Checking the Pardon Power’s Image for Authoritarian Threat – Response

I do love boomerangs… 😂

One QTreeper linked to this Gateway Pundit article recently:


INGRASSIA: America’s Political Tradition Comes From The Constitution: The Trump Mandate Calls For A Restoration Of Its Original Meaning And Preeminence

The author, Paul Ingrassia, is a Constitutional Scholar so it is worth reading in it’s entirety.

…The second branch of the government – aptly outlined under Article II, is the executive. The executive branch, under the Constitution’s very explicit original formulation (which, contrary to the overwhelming sentiment in today’s Washington, is an article that has not undergone emendation…) is vested entirely (in noticeable contradistinction to “mostly” or “largely”) in a (again, singular, one) President of the United States (“The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America” …the executive branch is the only one under our Constitution – which, again, is the law of the land – that is vested in a single individual….

In official duties, the President – or Chief Magistrate – is tasked with law enforcement. He is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, ensuring civilian control over the military — not, as our latter-day betters would have us believe, something to be outsourced to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or the Pentagon, or lobbyists and consultants working for Raytheon.

Being singular or unitary, the President appoints cabinet secretaries and federal judges. The latter [Should be former -GC] answer to him alone. And while Congressional approval, in some cases, is needed to fulfill the President’s constitutional obligation for nominations, the President – as the Unitary Executive – has full discretion over the tenures of each and every one of his underlings within the executive department

As for the agencies (and the larger bureaucracy), the acute observer will find – well, problematic – that no such fourth branch of government exists within the text of the Constitution…

Ingrassia makes the case that the federal bureaucracy is UNDER the executive branch, that is the PRESIDENT and therefore should be answerable to him. “…the President – as the Unitary Executive – has full discretion over the tenures of each and every one of his underlings within the executive department….” The following article from The Congressional Research Service (.gov) shows how Congress has gradually taken control of the executive from the President and turned it into an unelected, unfireable autocratic government aka The Deep State or Shadow Government.


Federal Labor Relations Statutes: An Overview

This article deals with the ‘Head of that Snake’ THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE

….

The president is also the commander-in-chief of the armed forces but even here the Cabal, via congress, has encroached on his powers.


Duke Univ: Can Presidents ‘fire’ senior military officers? Generally, yes…but it’s complicated

…A little history: up until the end of the Civil War, the President exercised virtually unconstrained power to dismiss military officers.  However, in 1865 Congress passed legislation which purports to limit that power.  That legislation was essentially the same as that found today codified in 10 USC § 1161(a).

The legitimacy of Congress imposing statutory restrictions on the authority of the President to remove military officers was initially “subject of doubt and discussion.”  It remains controversial even today, particularly since there doesn’t seem to be a case precisely on point as to the constitutionality.

👉Nevertheless, the better view does seem to suggest that Congress has the power to set some limits on the President’s dismissal authority – at least in times of peace….

The BETTER VIEW? In whose view? The Cabal’s? Note that article was written AFTER Obama’s Purge of around 200 top Military Officers. See List Of Military Elite Purged And Fired Under Obama and Obama purged military of those who sought victory

Ingrassia says:

To continue our analogy from above, the President is roughly akin to a British King – a comparison made both favorably and unfavorably throughout the Federalist Papers, that handbook to aid constitutional interpretation and explanation, devised by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay.

Thus we can go to The Federalist Papers, IF you can find them, to see what our founders actually meant… If you have any doubts. I had to use Yandex to actually find the papers.

[Listing of papers: https://www.federalistpapers.org/2012/12/federalist-papers.html]


FEDERALIST No. 23. The Necessity of a Government as Energetic as the One Proposed to the Preservation of the Union & No. 74. The Command of the Military and Naval Forces, and the Pardoning Power of the Executive.


…THE President of the United States is to be “commander-in-chief of the army and navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States when called into the actual service of the United States.” The propriety of this provision is so evident in itself, and it is, at the same time, so consonant to the precedents of the State constitutions in general, that little need be said to explain or enforce it. 👉Even those of them which have, in other respects, coupled the chief magistrate with a council, have for the most part concentrated the military authority 👉in him alone. Of all the cares or concerns of government, the direction of war most peculiarly demands those qualities which distinguish 👉the exercise of power by a single hand

Given Obama’s purge of the military and the loss of the smarter officers during the Clot Shot debacle, I think this is a very important part of POTUS Trump’s executive powers. Can You Really Be Recalled to Active Duty at Any Time? [YES!]

Q even say in Drop 2658

….PANIC IN DC?
WHY?
WHAT WAS LOST?
POWER OF THE PURSE.
COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY.
POWER TO REPLACE SENIOR OFFICIALS WITHIN CRUCIAL GOV POSITIONS (DEPT’S) WHO CAN THEN REPLACE SR+MID+LOW POSITIONS (TRICKLE_DOWN REPLACEMENT).
POWER TO APPOINT SC JUSTICES.
(What if HRC won and appointed 2+ crooked SCJs?)
(The Last Resort)
POWER TO DIRECTLY UNDO HUSSEIN/PREV EO’S WHICH HARMED-GREATLY LIMITED THE US IN MANY VITAL/NEC WAYS.
POWER TO REBUILD THE UNITED STATES MILITARY (BACK) TO A GLOBAL SUPER POWER.
(CHINA PAYOFFS (BRIBE $) FAILURE)

POWER TO ENACT LAWS BY EO TO COMBAT AND PROTECT OUR PEOPLE.
POWER TO SHIFT FOREIGN POLICY THEREBY REDUCING OUR ENEMIES ABILITY TO PROSPER AND SOMEDAY REIGN.
(IRAN DEAL – PARIS ACCORD – CHINA TRADE – SYRIA – ………………….)
POWER TO DECLAS CRUCIAL DOCS TO PROVIDE THE PUBLIC W/ THE TRUTH (TRANSPARENCY).
POWER TO GIVE BACK POWER TO THE PEOPLE (AS INTENDED BY OUR FOUNDERS).
LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD.

….

Ingrassia also cites Article III dealing with the establishment of the federal courts: the Supreme Court and the other federal courts. So let’s take a look at this branch of government since it is responsible for enforcing US law and the Constitution…. But IT HAS NOT! We pay attention to the DC government but most often over look the long term damage done by the corrupted judiciary.


U.S. Constitution – Article III | Constitution

Section 1

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office….

Section 2

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed…. [We now have trial by JUDGES or BUREAUCRATS and not juries BTW. – GC]

Section 3

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason…


So can Trump fire federal judges? NO, not according to Publius Huldah. I am a BIG FAN of this lady and I hope POTUS Trump finds a use for her, perhaps in JAG.

From her ABOUT page.
“…Publius Huldah” is the nom de guerre of Joanna Martin, J.D., who is a thoroughly nice person, in addition to all the above.  And if you hear otherwise, consider this from Socrates, who reportedly said, “When the debate is lost, slander is the weapon of the loser” [Boy, haven’t we seen the truth of that ancient wisdom! Also, if some one is slandered by the MSM, that means they are a threat to the Deep State in IMHO, – GC]


right out of law school & newly commissioned US Army JAGC

To the Department of Homeland Security:

I am delighted to  learn of your intense & increasing interest in learning the original intent of Our Constitution!  Please feel free to browse around to  your hearts’ content.

😂 The comments are worth reading BTW


A search for the word “Judge” on her site turns up some real goodies — LINK. She has a similar opinion of the Supreme Court and judges to mine. 😡


Defeat “COVID” Mandates by restoring the Genuine Meaning of the “privileges and immunities” and “due process” clauses

Someone asked me why I write on the US Constitution when the US Supreme Court won’t enforce it.

This is why:  Our Declaration of Independence recognizes the self-evident Truth that Rights come from God, and that they are unalienable.  Accordingly, there are certain areas of your life which are off-limits to government regulation – you have an “immunity” from governmental regulation of these areas.

But since the federal and state governments are refusing to recognize our Rights, it falls on us to boldly step up to the plate and insist that our Rights be respected.  You have no lawful, moral, or religious duty to submit to a government when it violates our Constitution and seeks to take from you the rights God gave you.

Governments do not have constitutional authority to force you to take the COVID JAB.

And in this paper I show that the “privileges and immunities” and “due process” clauses of the US Constitution prohibit the federal, state, and local governments from requiring you to be “jabbed” or putting you into a concentration camp if they assert that you are at “high risk” of getting infected [i.e., those who are 65 years of age or older]….

Why Supreme Court opinions are not the “Law of the Land”, and how to put federal judges in their place.

PLEASE READ!!! Huldah is a Constitutional scholar and lawyer. Her evisceration of the judiciary and Congress is Epic. [COSP =Convention of States Project, Mark Levin is an advocate BTW and thus a viper. I noticed after I pointed that out years ago at OT, the web page disappeared. 🤔]

One of her foot notes from another article: Transgenders in the Military – Who Decides: Congress, the President, or Federal Judges?

4 I trust you see why Hamilton is viciously smeared. The relentless attacks on our Framers have a purpose: Take them down – and our Foundation is destroyed. Hamilton wrote most of The Federalist Papers, which Madison and Jefferson recognized as the best evidence of the genuine meaning of our Constitution.  What effect do these constant attacks on Hamilton have on peoples’ respect for The Federalist Papers? Beware of false friends who undermine our Foundation; and of jealous men whose claim to fame is that they attack Hamilton. [In looking up various Federalist Papers on Brave, I have come across some doozys but could not find the actual papers, just commentary. — GC]


This is her conclusion in her article on Transgenders in the Military.

Conclusion

Let us put the federal courts in their proper place! Congress and the President have the recognized power to refuse to go along with unconstitutional or ultra vires acts of the Judicial Branch; and their Oaths of office require them to do so. Congress also has the power to rid us of usurping federal judges via the impeachment process.


You could also apply this reasoning to Biden using the US Military as guinea pigs for targets of a BIOWEAPON. She addresses that too in the first article I cited: Why Supreme Court opinions are not the “Law of the Land”

1. First Principles

Let’s analyze COSP’s silly argument. We begin by looking at First Principles:

♦The Judicial Branch was created by Art. III, §1, US Constitution. Accordingly, it is a “creature” of the Constitution. 1

♦The federal government came into existence when the States, acting through special ratifying conventions held in each of the States, ratified the Constitution.2

Since the Judicial Branch is merely a “creature” of the Constitution, it follows that it is subordinate to the Constitution, and is completely subject to its terms. It may not annul the superior authority of the States which created the Judicial Branch when they ratified the Constitution; and as a mere “creature” of the Constitution, it may NOT change the Constitution under which it holds its existence! 4

.we elect to Congress people who don’t know our Constitution or The Federalist Papers; and they are unaware of their Duty – imposed by their Oath of office – to function as a “check” on the Judicial Branch by impeaching federal judges who violate our Constitution.


The “Taxing Clause”, Five Lawless Judges, and obamacare

… we delegated only a very few powers to the federal government.

Accordingly, Congress has strictly limited legislative powers over the Country at large. These powers are listed primarily at Art. I, §8, clauses 3-16, and are restricted to war, international commerce & relations; and domestically, the creation of an uniform commercial system: weights & measures, patents & copyrights, a monetary system based on gold & silver, bankruptcy laws, mail delivery & roads. Several Amendments delegate to Congress some power over civil rights.

These enumerated powers are the only areas where the federal government has lawful authority over The States and The People in The States.  In all other matters [except those listed at Art. I, §10]the States and The People retain supremacy, independence, and sovereignty. Go here for a complete list of all of Congress’ Enumerated Powers.

Obamacare is altogether unconstitutional because it is outside the scope of the legislative powers We granted to Congress. 👉 Nothing in Our Constitution authorizes the federal government to control our medical care 👈 (or to exercise the other fearsome powers in the Act)...


The Oath Of Office: The Check On Usurpations By Congress, The Executive Branch, & Federal Judges.

… it is a President’s sworn duty to refuse to enforce any unconstitutional “law” made by Congress. And contrary to the misinformation with which we are constantly bombarded, judges are not vested with exclusive authority to declare Acts of Congress unconstitutional.

The Truth is that a President, the States, local governments, 👉and individual citizens👈, together with the courts, all have the Right &Duty to overrule – to spurn & cast out – unconstitutional laws made by Congress. For it is a fundamental [though long suppressed] Principle of our Founding that an unconstitutional “law” is no “law” at all – it is a “mere usurpation, and deserves to be treated as such”…

I am going to detour to what I consider an important topic in my old notes, JURY NULLIFICATION. It is the American citizens FINAL SAY on the laws passed by our representatives. From 2015:

A pamphlet told the juror what his Constitutional rights and obligations were. This is information the JUDGE should be clearly stating to EVERY JURY. INSTEAD He was arrested for handing out literature. LINK

In fact this is becoming a LAW in some states thanks to the groups handing out the pamphlets.

This is perhaps THE MOST IMPORTANT move any American can make to protect our freedom. WE as Jurorists have the RIGHT and duty to judge not only the case by the LAW itself. We as Jurorists CAN set aside laws passed by Congress! This is the ultimate power of the people over the government and the Elite want to keep it hidden!

SEPTEMBER 30, 2007

WHAT JUDGES & LAWYERS WON’T TELL YOU ABOUT JURIES

…On appeal, however, the jurors’ action was upheld and the right of juries to judge both the law and the facts — to nullify the law if it chose — became part of British constitutional law.

It ultimately became part of American constitutional law as well, With only a few exceptions, juries are explicitly or implicitly told to worry only about the facts and let the judge decide the law.

The right of jury nullification has become one of the legal system’s best kept secrets.

Now a remarkable coalition has sprung up to challenge this secrecy as undemocratic, unconstitutional and dangerous…

FIJA seeks to require that juries be informed of their nullification rights. Informed jury amendments have been filed as an initiative in seven states and legislation has been introduced in the Alaska state legislature.

Merely raising the issue of nullification can make prosecutors nervous, for it takes only one person aware of the right in order to hang a jury. In Washington, DC, where the concept was discussed in connection with the Marion Barry trial, a local television station reported that the US Attorney was worried that a jury might nullify the law in that case……

Far from being an unintended side-effect, jury nullification is explicitly authorized in the constitutions of 24 states. State Language on Jury Nullification

“…Merely raising the issue of nullification can make prosecutors nervous…”


Publius Huldah gets into WHY prosecutors become nervous and what has been done to our legal system.


The Trial of The Lawsuit Against The State of Arizona: Must Supreme Court Judges Obey The Constitution?

…The Federalist Papers were written during 1787-88 by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, to explain the proposed Constitution to The People and to induce them to ratify it. Thus, The Federalist is the most authoritative commentary on the genuine meaning of Our Constitution.  And at a meeting of the Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia on March 4, 1825 at which Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were present, the following resolution selecting the texts for the Law school, was passed:

…on the distinctive principles of the government of our own state, and of that of the US. the best guides are to be found in 1. the Declaration of Independance, as the fundamental act of union of these states. 2. the book known by the title of `The Federalist’, being an authority to which appeal is habitually made by all, and rarely declined or denied by any as evidence of the general opinion of those who framed, and of those who accepted the Constitution of the US. on questions as to it’s genuine meaning…. (page 83)  [emphasis added]

So! Thomas Jefferson, Author of the Declaration of Independence, and James Madison, Father of The Constitution, acknowledged the high authoritative status of The Federalist Papers.  They saw The Constitution as having a fixed meaning which one could learn by consulting The Federalist!

2. But supreme Court judges soon refused to submit to The Constitution as explained by The Federalist Papers. In 1907, former Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes said, “…the Constitution is what the judges say it is…”.  Judges thus rejected the objective standard provided by The Federalist, and substituted their own subjective interpretations. Law schools embraced this subversion:  Instead of teaching The Constitution as a set of fixed principles explained by The Federalist, they taught supreme Court opinions which say Congress may do whatever it pleases. They also taught that supreme Court judges have unbridled authority to say what the Constitution means. Law schools thus produced generations of constitutionally illiterate lawyers & judges who have been indoctrinated with the monstrous Lie that Our Constitution means whatever judges on the supreme Court say!  And because these lawyers failed in their sacred duty to think, and uncritically accepted what they were told, Our Country is on the brink of destruction….


Of course our John Dewey Progressive School System made DARN SURE Americans are completely ignorant of our Constitution, rights and remedies, the better to turn us into good little Marxist slaves.

On last,
Publius Huldah’s article on calling forth the militia.


Our Constitution provides two separate & independent methods for the federal government to “call forth the Militia” to suppress Insurrections

Because of its excellence and relevance to the insurrections being fomented in our cities by the Marxist organization “Black Lives Matter”, Antifa, and other revolutionary organizations; I sent the recent paper by Edwin Vieira, JD., Ph.D., titled, “The President’s Authority To Suppress Insurrections” [link], to my lists.

In response, some objected that the riots in the cities are local issues to be handled (or not) by the State and local governments – that they are not “federal” issues over which the federal government has jurisdiction. Some also asserted that Article IV, §4, US Constitution prohibits the President from sending the National Guard into a State to quell such disturbances, unless & until the Legislature or the Governor of the State requests it.

Those objections are not well-founded.

First: What’s going on in our cities is not something which can be prudently brushed aside. It is a classic manifestation of a Marxist revolution – see, e.g., this article from “Workers’ World”. Furthermore, as shown below, the President of the United States has constitutional and statutory authority to exercise his own judgment as to whether he should send in the “Militia” to suppress the uprisings.

Second: Our Constitution provides two separate and independent methods for the federal government to suppress such uprisings.

Dr. Vieira’s paper sets forth the other method of “calling forth the Militia” – the method provided for at Article I, §8, clauses 15 & 16, US Constitution. That provides for the intervention of the Militia within a State at the initiative of the federal government, regardless of whether the State requests it.. 1

I hope you enjoyed my tour through some of Publius Huldah’s articles and will continue reading her excellent commentary. I am now going to look at a few other articles of interest by others.


Security Clearances and Presidential Authority

….a recent Congressional Research Service report explains. “The criteria for election or appointment to these positions are specified in the U.S. Constitution, and except by constitutional amendment, no additional criteria (e.g., holding a security clearance) may be required.”

In fact, the security clearance system itself is an expression of presidential authority. Its scope and operation are defined in an executive order (EO 12968), and its terms can be modified by the President at will.

And if the President wished to grant access to classified information to a family member, for example, there would be no legal barrier to doing so…..

So that kills THAT objection by RINOs and Demonrats when it comes to ratifying POTUS Trump’s picks.

08/01/19 The Hill:

Senate Democrats demand Trump order review of White House Security Clearances

…Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson wrote in a letter to the senators earlier this month that he could not begin a review of the security clearance process without direction from Trump or one of his “designees” because “the authority over access to classified information ultimately rests with the President of the United States.”…

Of course the Senate has ZERO jurisdiction over Security Clearances so this is just more encroachment on the executive.

Matt Gaetz

So You CAN appoint a private citizen as a Special Counsel, and they can begin their important work WITHOUT a Senate confirmation hearing or vote?

June 11, 2021 Justice Dept. to probe secret subpoena for Schiff’s records on Trump’s watch


Jan. 25, 2023 Kevin McCarthy kicks Reps. Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell off intel panel

From Brian Cates: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1863237024204927401.html

H/T TradeBait2 for the Cate’s links.

Now Adam Schiff is going to be come a senator. I wonder if POTUS Trump will deny him a security clearance…. OR WORSE?

Added by Wolf…..

Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA) on Tuesday assailed President-elect Donald Trump’s suggestion that he and other former members of the defunct House Jan. 6 committee be imprisoned.

Trump advocated that those on the former panel who investigated the 2021 U.S. Capitol riot and his role in overturning the 2020 election should “go to jail.”

“I don’t think the incoming president should be threatening his political opponents with jail time,” Schiff told reporters on his first full day as a senator. “That’s not the kind of talk we should hear from the president in a democracy, nor do I think that a pardon is necessary for the members of the Jan. 6 committee.”

President Joe Biden is weighing preemptive pardons over fears Trump may seek retribution against Schiff and other high-profile members of the bipartisan panel, including former Chairman Bennie Thomson (D-MS), Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), and former Rep. Liz Cheney. Biden is also considering pardons for other political foes who could come under Trump’s microscope.

“We are proud of the work we did in that committee,” Schiff continued. “It was a fundamental oversight obligation to investigate the first attempt to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power in our history.”

Trump said in an NBC Meet the Press interview that aired over the weekend that he would not direct Justice Department officials to bring charges against the committee members but accused them of engaging in unspecified criminal activity.

“For what they did, honestly, they should go to jail,” Trump said.

In a separate portion, Trump said that “retribution will be through success.” He’s also vowed to pardon those charged with and convicted of crimes related to the Capitol riot.

Let’s see what happens to Pencil-Neck Shifty Schiff!


COVID and BEYOND FAKE NEWS: The “Trusted News Initiative”

How the Fake News, Social Media and the Deep State set up the Scamdemic behind our backs

A Gail Combs deep dive into a curious item revealed by Robert Malone on Joe Rogan.

https://www.mediainfoline.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Beyond-Fake-News-logo.jpg


Preface by Wolf Moon

Follow along as Gail Combs digs down a snake-infested rabbit hole from something that Dr. Robert Malone mentioned on Joe Rogan.

Once you understand how much preparation went into what is going on RIGHT NOW, you’ll realize that all the usual suspects had a plan, and it’s exactly what we’re seeing now, except they weren’t banking on us understanding their criminal conspiracy.


2:40:50 “We are in an environment where truth and consequences are fungible. This is Modern media management and warfare. The Truth is what those that are managing ‘The Trusted News Initiative’ say it is. “

Dr Robert Malone

From video Dr Robert Malone on Joe Rogan

https://rumble.com/vrv7k1-dr.-robert-malone-on-joe-rogans-podcast.html

CRITICAL TIMELINE

JULY 2019

BBC: Beyond Fake News

Trusted News Initiative

How news organisations can rebuild trust and tackle the next disinformation challenges.

Trust In News

The BBC’s Trusted News Initiative is a partnership that includes organisations such as Facebook, Twitter, Reuters and The Washington Post. It is the only forum in the world of its kind designed to take on disinformation in real time. Now we and our partners are going to share what we’ve all learned about how to tackle disinformation, and you are invited.

Trusted News Initiative or Corrupted News Initiative? Mission: Systematic censorship of the world’s top public health experts

In this August 13, 2021 article for Global Research, Elizabeth Woodworth explains how the Trusted News Initiative (TNI) was formed and what it means to our modern society.

According to Woodsworth, even before the pandemic, there has been a continued increase in public distrust to mainstream media. The TNI began in July 2019 when BBC Director-General Tony Hall convened various media companies and Big Tech companies to “arrive at a practical set of actions we can take together, right now, to tackle the rise of misinformation and bias…[by creating a] global alliance for integrity in news…to promote freedom and democracy worldwide”.

From the beginning, the goal of TNI was to counter “anti-vaxxers [who] were gaining traction on social media as a part of a “fake news” movement spreading “misleading and dangerous information”….

TNI has become an instrumental tool for the suppression of life-saving information….

Trump-Ukraine impeachment scandal: timeline of key events

YEAR 2019

18 July Trump issues instructions to withhold $392m in military aid from Ukraine

25 July Trump and Zelenskiy speak on the phone.

12 August A whistleblower complaint is filed.

24 September The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, announces a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump’s actions.

6 October Lawyers for the first whistleblower say they are now representing a second.

8 October The state department prevents Gordon Sondland, US ambassador to the EU and a Trump donor, from testifying to a congressional impeachment hearing.

October 18 Event 201

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YxxNZ5u6JXo/maxresdefault.jpg

Event 201

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.

….

October 18 – 28, 2019

https://obj.shine.cn/files/2019/10/18/b9afeeca-61e9-4c63-b79d-44a28dd12340_0.jpg

CISM Military World Games – U.S. Department of Defense

Top U.S. military athletes are competing against their counterparts from more than 100 nations during the 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan, China, Oct. 18-28.

Did the Military World Games Spread COVID-19?

The 2019 Military World Games, branded the “Peace Games,” was the largest military sports event ever held in China. More than 9,000 athletes representing the militaries of more than 100 countries competed in 27 sports

Whistleblower: 2019 Wuhan Military Games Were China’s First Intentional COVID Super-Spreader Event

On July 21, 2021, Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. broke the news on The Gateway Pundit from a China source that the release of COVID-19 at the 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan was a test of the longer-term effects of that type of bioweapon because foreign visitors to the Games would carry it back to their own countries and the consequences could be observed. . .

Letter to Congress:

https://gallagher.house.gov/sites/gallagher.house.gov/files/Letter_World%20Military%20Games_6.21.pdf

December 11, 2019 The Hill

Scientist claims first known COVID-19 case was Wuhan market vendor

Michael Worobey, head of the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Arizona, wrote in a piece published in the journal Science that a female seafood vendor who worked at the live animal market in Wuhan and became ill on Dec. 11, 2019, was likely the first known case of COVID-19.

December 18 – House voted to impeach Trump

CDC Museum COVID-19 Timeline



December 31, 2019 The World Health Organization China Country Office is informed of a number cases of pneumonia of unknown etiology…

January 2, 2020 The World Health Organization activates its incident management system…

January 5, 2020 CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) activates a Center Level Response…

January 7, 2020 Chinese authorities identify and isolate a novel coronavirus….

January 7, 2020
CDC establishes a 2019-nCoV Incident Management Structure to guide the response….

[January 16, 2020 – Articles delivered & Impeachment Trial began in the Senate]
January 17, 2020 CDC begins screening passengers on direct and connecting flights from Wuhan, China 

January 17, 2020 CDC deploys a team to Washington state to assist with contact tracing efforts in response to the first reported case 

January 20, 2020 CDC confirms the first U.S. laboratory-confirmed case of COVID-19 in the U.S.

January 21, 2020 CDC transitions from a Center-led Incident Management Structure to an Agency-wide Structure and activates its Emergency Response System

[January 25, 2021, House impeachment managers delivered the article of impeachment to the U.S. Senate.]

February 5, 2020 Senate voted to acquit

March 27 2020 CARES act passed It pays hospitals to kill elderly covid patients. See Sec. 3710….. Assoc of American Physicians & Surgeons : Biden’s Bounty on your Life

The Timeline seems to indicate that President Trump was kept distracted while the Democrats and Mr Global put the pieces in place to unleash the Plandemic and force the world to take the clot shot.

…………….

The NUREMBERG CODE is worth rereading before we go down into the snake pit.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FIQ9KIsVIAAeZ17.jpg

While Collins, Fauci, hospitals and medical boards moved to silence and censor ALL opinions by dissenting experts, the Trusted News Initiative also muzzled anyone else not advocating for the Clot Shot. However Mr Global went even further than censorship and threatening jobs and medical licenses.

TEN NIH STUDIES ON ‘VACCINE REFUSAL’

‘Vaccine Refusal’ is considered a ‘condition or disease’ that needs ‘treatment’ The following are trials to determine how to convince brainwash people into consenting to taking an experimental drug WITHOUT giving them full disclosure.

NEW TRIAL!!! COVID-19 Messaging for Vaccination

MIT Cambridge, MA ; Behavioral: Doctor Videos

  • Behavioral: Sharing Videos
  • Behavioral: Sharing Videos (Influencers)
  • (and 3 more…)

Collaborators:

Facebook, Inc. aka Mark Zuckerberg who was Caught Stealing Election With Ballot Drop Boxes

And his CHINESE WIFE (Red Diaper Baby from China?)

She was mostly raised by her Chinese grandmother, who spoke no English. She was a very dignified woman who clearly was a huge influence in Priscilla’s life…. But the precise details of how the family arrived in America are unclear. Reports in China say they came originally from the city of Xuzhou in eastern Chandong province, also the home city of Rupert Murdoch’s wife Wendi Deng. Others say that the family lived in Nanjing, an industrial town 150 miles west of Shanghai, before leaving to live first in Hong Kong and later in the US.

A source at the Asian-American Civic Association in Boston said it was ‘highly likely’ the family spent time in a refugee camp, either in Hong Kong or on arrival in the US.

Priscilla’s father said he was a refugee who had lived in Vietnam, according to Thai-born Napat

Records show Dennis,[Her father] who now owns a small wholesale fish business, was given a social security number as an ‘Asian Refugee’ between April 1975 and November 1979.

Code3

Stanford University

Harvard University

Yale University

Johns Hopkins University

Massachusetts General Hospital

Ludwig-Maximilians – University of Munich

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Study Description

Brief Summary:

This study will distribute videos of health professionals encouraging Covid-19 vaccination to a large sample of Facebook users, and will test the most effective ways to maximize diffusion of this vaccine-related content to increase vaccination rates. The study sample will be U.S. states where vaccination rates remained low in fall 2021. The experimental design is an RCT with 4 groups, randomized at the county level: 1) a control group which receives no intervention, 2) a treatment group in which Facebook users receive ads which include videos of health professionals telling them to get vaccinated, 3) a treatment group in which Facebook users receive ads which include videos of health professionals encouraging them to help their friends to get vaccinated, and 4) a treatment group in which Facebook users receive ads which include videos of health professionals encouraging them to get their most influential friends to help their friends get vaccinated. In treatments 3 and 4, participants will have the option to sign up to be a “vaccine ambassador,” in which case they will get notifications when the study team posts new vaccine-related content, and will receive reminders about encouraging their friends to be vaccinated. The vaccine ambassadors will also be entered into a lottery to win prizes. The study team is building a website to host the videos of health professionals which answer common questions about Covid-19 vaccination. The investigators will measure engagement with the vaccine-related content as well as assess effects on vaccination rates at the county level.

Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment  :40,000,000 participants
Allocation:Randomized
Intervention Model:Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:There are four arms in the study which geographic areas are assigned to in parallel. The geographic areas in the three treatment arms will receive a Facebook ad campaign over the same time period to one another.
Masking:None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:Treatment
Official Title:Increasing the Effectiveness and Diffusion of COVID-19 Messaging for Vaccination
Actual Study Start Date  :December 22, 2021
Estimated Primary Completion Date  :January 2022
Estimated Study Completion Date  :June 2022
THAT IS 40 MILLION PEOPLE!!!

……….

A Tailored, Health Communication Intervention for HPV Vaccine Hesitant Families – Meharry Medical College, Nashville TN

……….

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Dental Faculty Staff Members

– Ain Shams University Cairo, Egypt

………..

Development and Testing of ADEPT: A Parent Decision Support for Childhood Vaccinations

Duke University Health System, Durham, NC ( Childhood vaccination decision support tool) Principal Investigator Lavanya Vasudevan, Ph.D.

Collaborator: National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1KL2TR002554 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )

………..

Clinic-based HPV and COVID-19 Vaccine Promoting Intervention for AfAm Adolescents in Alabama

– University of Alabama at Birmingham (Behavioral: Intervention)

Contact: Henna Budhwani, PhD, MPH 

……….

Improving Health Equity for COVID-19 Vaccination for At-risk Populations Using Online Social Networks

– Annenberg School Philadelphia, PA

Behavioral: Online Social Network and Collective Intelligence Intervention :

Behavioral: Independent Control

Collaborators: University of California, Davis, University of California, San Francisco, University of California, Berkeley

Brief Summary:

Social technologies for health have already become essential means for providing underserved populations greater social connectedness and increased access to novel health information. However, these technologies have also had negative unintended consequences. The resulting digital divide in social technology takes many forms – from explicit racism that excludes African American and Latinx populations from the resources enjoyed by White and Asian members of online communities, to self-segregation for the purposes of identity preservation and community-building that unintentionally results in limited informational diversity in underserved communities. The result is an often unnoticed, but highly consequential compounding of inequities.

This research seeks to use an online social network approach to address these challenges, in which the investigators demonstrate how reducing the online levels of network centralization and network homophily among African American community members directly increases their productive engagement with health-promoting information.

………..

Project 2VIDA! COVID-19 Vaccine Intervention Delivery for Adults in Southern California

San Ysidro Health Chula Vista CA;

Care View Health Center San Diego, CA;

San Ysidro Health Care View Health Center, San Diego, CA; and 3 more…

Principal Investigator: Argentina Servin, MD, MPH, Asst Prof,

Sponsors/Collaborators National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)

Behavioral: COVID-19 Individual Awareness and Education;

Behavioral: COVID-19 Community Outreach & Health Promotion;

Behavioral: COVID-19 Individual Health Education & Linkages to Medical and Supportive Services;

Biological: Pop-up community vaccination sites

-GC


Conclusion by Wolf Moon

Do you see it now? They knew exactly what they were doing. Schiff’s kabuki with Zuckerberg was like a GO signal to start the censorship.

That creepy pedophile loser, the compromised Dem Rep on the committee that’s SUPPOSED to control the IC, but is in fact CONTROLLED BY IT, signals to the IC social media that’s SUPPOSED to serve us, but in fact SERVES THE IC, that they need to start censoring us by removing InfoWars and Natural News.

It ALL makes sense now.

CHICOMS. These people are no better than CHICOMS. Allies of the enemies of America. Traitors of the worst kind.

W

The Clot Shot, The Explanation Thereof, And The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand

I. The Clot Shot

First things first.

Nobody would be calling ALL of the various full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein vaccines “the clot shot” if there weren’t some clear and obvious problems with the full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein ITSELF.

We already know that clotting dysfunction is key to COVID-19 pathogenicity. SO – it’s not exactly a surprise that the spike protein itself, and likewise the S1 subunit of that protein – a.k.a. THE BUSINESS END – are themselves pathogenic.


EXAMPLE:

Spike Protein S1 Subunit as Direct Lung Pathogen

LINK 1: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34156871/

LINK 2: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384477/


In the above example, the S1 subunit of the spike protein was basically 100% lethal to humanized mice when applied to their lungs.

And when they looked at the mice, the damage was basically the same as the damage from COVID-19.

Just sayin’.


So let me now TEST you, and see if you’re more of a scientist than Fauci’s protege Rochelle Alinsky – WHOOPS – I mean Rochelle Walensky – who heads the CDC for Fauci to maintain control of it.

If you give a SPIKE PROTEIN VACCINE to somebody, and they have symptoms of COVID-19 during the next few days, or even during the next two weeks, which scenario is more likely?

(A) – The person just happened to get real COVID-19, and THAT spike protein did BAD THINGS.

(B) – The spike protein you put inside the person did BAD THINGS.

Do you see how science works?

It’s a lot like common sense, only it’s applied to fancy stuff.

I want you to meet some great scientists here. These are people with very little scientific authority, but they simply practiced science, instead of repeating what authorities told them.


(1) – The CNA who would not accept “super-spreader” myths

This guy was one of the first people to administer the Pfizer vaccine to nursing home residents.

He was shocked that his nursing home residents would die shortly after being vaccinated – after having survived for months BEFORE the vaccine – in a way that was clearly related to their being vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine.

Nursing home management would NOT admit to the obvious connection – and created a mythical “super-spreader” to explain the deaths.

This man is a HERO.

The first 10 minutes of the video is this man working up the courage of conscience – to SPEAK THE TRUTH. If you just want to hear what he needed to say, you can jump to 10 minutes and you will hear the SCIENCE.

LINK 1: https://rumble.com/vdaicp-cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-inj.html

LINK 2: https://www.bitchute.com/video/cpQ7dnqu0Sos/

LINK 3: https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-injections-speak-out/

LINK 4: https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-are-dying-like-flies-after-covid-injections-speak-out/


(2) – From Physician’s Assistant to VAERS Whistleblower

This lady, a hospital physician’s assistant, started out as a “COVID training true believer”, but she began observing what the shots were doing in her hospital. From there, she began encountering resistance to “doing the right thing”.

Now, in retrospect, you can see everybody in the system avoiding responsibility – not just for the problem, but for even reporting it.

A fantastic interview by Del Bigtree’s Highwire show.

LINK 1: https://thehighwire.com/videos/these-patients-deserve-to-be-heard-vaers-whistleblower/

LINK 2: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/17/physicians-asst-whistleblower-reveals-hospital-intake-with-90-percent-vaccinated-patients-and-hospital-administration-refusing-to-report-adverse-events/


(3) – Doctor Discovers Disseminated Clotting in Most Vaccinated Patients

We covered this just recently, HERE.

This doctor discovered not only that “the jab” was leading to loss of wind (reduced effort tolerance) in too many of his patients – a whopping 62% of all his patients were showing signs of microscopic clotting – similar to COVID-19 – after vaccination.

LINK:  https(colon)//www.bitchute(dot)com/video/A6GbcUl6blpJ/


Bibliography of our own Spike Protein Suspicions

Now – this site has also not been negligent in reporting on the problems of the “clot shot”, as you can see from the following bibliography.

Thus, you will see that we were READY when a good explanation of the clot shot arose.


II. The Explanation

I want to start by thanking barkerjim for posting a comment with a link that leads to a very recent paper (pre-peer-review, of course) that explains the clot shot. He found the link HERE on Denninger’s Market Ticker site.

The order of the finding:

Denninger Comment: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=3724148

Q Tree Comment: https://www.theqtree.com/2021/10/18/dear-kmag-20211018-joe-biden-didnt-win-%e2%9d%80-open-topic/comment-page-2/#comment-816737

Ecosophia Comment: https://ecosophia.dreamwidth.org/152821.html?thread=20225013#cmt20225013

Preprint Paper: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.12.464152v1.full.pdf

I will include the entirety of the anonymous comment on the Ecosophy blog.


Spike Protein Clotting Mechanism

Date: 2021-10-14 06:10 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Preprint posted today. This is potentially a bombshell paper.

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces abnormal inflammatory blood clots neutralized by fibrin immunotherapy

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.12.464152v1.full.pdf

“Here we report that the Spike protein from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) binds to the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and induces structurally abnormal blood clots with heightened proinflammatory activity. SARS-CoV-2 Spike virions enhanced fibrin-mediated microglia activation and induced fibrinogen-dependent lung pathology. COVID-19 patients had fibrin autoantibodies that persisted long after acute infection.”

“The central structural component of blood clots, and a key regulator of inflammation in disease, is insoluble fibrin, which is derived from the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and is deposited in tissues at sites of vascular damage (10, 11). Hypercoagulability in COVID-19 is associated with inflammation and the formation of fibrin clots resistant to degradation despite adequate anticoagulation (3-5). Extensive fibrin deposits are detected locally in inflamed lung and brain tissues from COVID-19 patients, sometimes without evidence of direct viral infection at autopsy (1, 8, 12-14). The high prevalence of thrombotic events with these unique hypercoagulability features suggests an as yet unknown mechanism of abnormal blood clot formation in COVID-19. We set out to determine how blood clots form in COVID-19 and to identify therapies to combat the deleterious effects of abnormal coagulation occurring in acute and convalescent stages of disease.”

“Since hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients has features distinct from those of other inflammatory diseases, we hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 directly affects the structural and functional properties of blood clots. Incubation of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant trimeric spike protein (Spike) with healthy donor plasma increased fibrin polymerization (Fig. 1A). Spike strikingly altered the fibrin clot structure resulting in thinner fibers with a rough appearance and increased clot density as shown by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Fig. 1B, fig. S1), identifying direct effects of SARS-CoV-2 Spike on fibrin clot architecture. Consistent with these structural changes, a solid-phase binding assay revealed binding of Spike to both fibrinogen and fibrin (Kd 5.3 μM and 0.4 μM, respectively) (Fig. 1C). Fibrinogen immunoprecipitated with full-length recombinant trimeric Spike, and studies with deletion mutants identified an interaction with the S2 domain of Spike (Fig. 1D, fig. S2).”

“Intravenous administration of Spike PVs in wild-type (WT) mice induced extensive fibrin deposition in the lung (Fig. 2A). (…) Fibrin deposition was associated with activated endothelium in the lung, and gene expression analysis revealed increased expression of endothelial and inflammatory markers in Spike PV-injected mice (…) consistent with findings of SARS-CoV-2 toxicity to endothelial cells (19). (…) Mice genetically-deficient in fibrinogen (Fgα–/– mice), which express all other blood proteins except fibrinogen and are protected from autoimmune and inflammatory conditions (11), did not exhibit lung pathology following Spike PV challenge (Fig. 2E, fig. S5).”

“Fibrinogen is causally linked to the activation of macrophages and microglia in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in the brain and periphery (11, 21). Fibrin is a driver of microglia-induced cognitive dysfunction (22) and is associated with perivascular-activated microglia and macrophages in brains of COVID-19 patients even without signs of infection (12).”

“A surge of autoantibody production against diverse immune targets have been detected in COVID-19 patients (25). To determine whether COVID-19 patients develop autoantibodies
against abnormal blood clots, we tested autoantibody responses to fibrin. (…) We tested longitudinally collected serum samples ranging from acute to convalescent disease stages from 54 COVID-19 asymptomatic, mild, and severe disease patients requiring
admission to the intensive care units (table S3). Fibrin autoantibodies were abundant in all three groups of COVID-19 patients and persisted during the convalescent stage, but were scarce in healthy donor controls or in subjects with non-COVID respiratory illnesses (Fig. 4A, B).”

“In summary, we find that SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein enhances the formation of highly
inflammatory clots that are neutralized by a fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody. Our data shed
new light on the enigmatic coagulopathy found in COVID-19 revealing a causal role for fibrinogen
in thromboinflammation – even independent of active viral replication. The high incidence of clotting complications in COVID-19 has been attributed to systemic inflammation (3), vascular damage including abnormal levels of circulating coagulation proteins (1, 26), genetic susceptibility to tissue factor and complement genes (27), and prothrombotic autoantibodies (28). Our findings now show that coagulopathy is not merely a consequence of inflammation. Rather, the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 Spike with fibrinogen and fibrin results in abnormal blood clot formation that in turn drives inflammation.”


[ THIS HERE IS THE PART TO READ ]

Assuming the results are correct – and I can see little reason to doubt them though replication is always important – this really starts to put the puzzle pieces together. I’m frankly amazed that it took so long to figure this out.

In less-scientific language:

1. The spike protein binds directly to fibrinogen, the protein precursor of fibrin which forms blood clots.

2. This binding causes the fibrinogen to polymerize to form fibrin strands, thus forming clots.

3. Spike binding to fibrin in clots also changes the clot structure and renders it resistant to degradation.

4. Fibrin induces immune inflammation. This is usually adaptive because clotting occurs at sites of injury. It is dangerous when it occurs in response to diffuse and extensive spike-mediated micro-clotting. This helps to explain the runaway immune-mediated inflammatory response characteristic of severe Covid-19.

5. Spike *alone* (in the absence of an infectious virus) induces fibrin deposition and inflammation in the lungs of mice. However, mice lacking the gene for fibrinogen exhibited no pathology upon spike exposure, demonstrating that the fibrinogen-spike interaction is necessary and sufficient for spike-induced pathology.

6. Fibrin induces cognitive dysfunction via immune inflammation in the brain.

7. Many recovered Covid-19 patients have abundant autoantibodies against fibrin – independent of disease severity – while these autoantibodies are rare in unexposed people. This indicates both that spike-mediated fibrin formation is occurring in the course of actual human infection, and that autoreactive antibodies are formed which may play a role in chronic/long-haul symptoms or prolonged clotting problems.

8. A fibrin-targeting monoclonal antibody greatly reduced inflammation, suggesting a potential new route for disease treatment.

The paper never uses the word “vaccine” – a glaring and clearly intentional omission – but it should be obvious based on these findings that instructing the body to produce large amounts of spike protein on multiple occasions is a dangerous prospect, and it also explains those autopsy revelations of bodies full of clots.

One caveat: The coordinating author is working with a start-up company to develop treatments based on reducing fibrin-mediated inflammation, so there is clearly some commercial interest here that could be influencing objectivity. On the other hand, it is often the entrepreneurial think-outside-the-box types who end up making groundbreaking discoveries.

Mark L

[ BOOM!!! ]


This is AMAZING and powerful work.

Remember that scientific paper that we started this article with?

NOW we know exactly how that happens. See how the SCIENCE is all connecting together?

The commenter on Ecosophia makes TWO critical points.

POINT ONE is that vaccines are never mentioned. That is how this work will eventually be published. The Rochelle Alinsky CDC could STOP the paper as potentially causing “vaccine hesitancy” if the authors mentioned vaccines, but by throwing no stones, none bounce back.

The CDC will still likely DELAY this from being published for as long as they can. But by avoiding mention of vaccines, the paper cannot be scuttled on the grounds that it “might cause vaccine hesitancy”, which is the FALSE IMPERATIVE that the CDC socialists use to control science and force vaccines on us as a social sabotage. Instead, the READER can make the connections and understand the implications for vaccines.

Do you see why PREPUBLICATION COMMUNICATIONS (like this one) are now so important?

POINT TWO is that it’s JUST THE SPIKE PROTEIN – NOT THE VIRUS AS A WHOLE – that causes the problems. And it’s been PROVEN. And it’s been PROVEN that THIS is the mechanism of the problems induced by the spike protein.

The moniker of “CLOT SHOT” is literally proven to be correct.

This is a BOMBSHELL because it indicts the entire concept of full-length spike protein vaccines as fundamentally flawed. It indicts mRNA vaccines as even more flawed than antigen, because the amount of toxic spike protein is unregulated. (Notice that I’ve been saying this all along.) It doesn’t necessarily say that other types of vaccines (like RBD subunit antigen vaccines) are any safer than spike protein antigen vaccines, but they MIGHT BE.

Something even BETTER here, than just the fibrinogen mechanism, is the way that this EXPLAINS (point 4 above) what one nurse practitioner observed – that COVID strikes PRE-EXISTING INFLAMMATION. Both the WHY of some people having severe COVID and others not, and the LOCATION of those issues, is explained by fibrin’s ties to pre-existing inflammation. We now have a mechanism which we already know follows that rule, because that’s how fibrin works.

This also explains why antihistamines work to save people from severe COVID. Antihistamines are generally useful against severe inflammation by pathogenic substances which cause inflammatory reactions. It’s why they administer benadryl as a general emergency antiinflammatory for purposes like anaphylaxis prevention.

The Zyrtec Rebellion

Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …


And yet the CDC has WARNED people against taking antihistamines with the vaccine – when this work LITERALLY PROVES WHY THAT IS A GOOD STRATEGY – just as it is a good strategy to take antihistamines to protect against severe COVID.

Like I said, this study proves THAT we were right, and WHY we were right.

And why is CDC so WRONG – time and time again?

This is a breaker of logjams. The insistence on the use of a fundamentally flawed vaccine is CRIMINAL.

Mandates are bad enough, but over a vaccine, the very principle of which is scientifically proven as DANGEROUS?

If mandates continue, these people need to be in JAIL. If they RESIST, they need to be OVERTHROWN.

In short, THIS.

https://twitter.com/TheJuggernaut88/status/1450593202050715655

Mandating this fundamentally dangerous vaccine is so wrong on so many levels.

This is a EUGENIC VACCINE if there ever was one. It’s almost DESIGNED to finish off people who are not 100% healthy.

How can this be right? Seriously. How can this be right?

We can no longer tolerate these people who pretend not to know.


III. The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand

I start this section by thanking three people – Sundance, Aubergine, and Trumpismine – who helped me to see what is going on here.

SUNDANCE informed me of the “Mamet Principle” – that liberals pretend not to know things

AUBERGINE formulated her wonderful Razor – that it is dangerous to dismiss such pretense as mere stupidity, when it might be the product of malice or guile.

TRUMPISMINE turned me on to the Wikipedia definition of Lysenkoism, which contained enough detail that I was able to connect the goals of old Lysenkoism to the actions of the left today.


The so-called Mamet Principle is a paraphrase of a repeated point by David Mamet, which Sundance encapsulated as a principle. This has been discussed and exemplified many times, both here and on CTH.

In asking WHY liberals “pretend not to know things”, we now understand that Hanlon’s Razor is an EXCUSE – that it’s COVER – and that it’s NOT because they’re STUPID, but rather because they’re smart and evil.

The best and most concise description is a reworking of Hanlon’s Razor by our own Aubergine.

So what if we apply this to Saint Fauci of Antibodies?


Anthony Fauci has a literal MAGICIAN’S POWER to make people focus on the WRONG THING. His skills of EVASION are absolutely outstanding. I love to call it “antibody hypnosis”, because that is exactly what it seems like.

“YOU WILL LOOK AT THE ANTIBODIES. THE ANTIBODIES WILL SAVE YOU. LOOK ONLY AT THE ANTIBODIES. YOU ARE FEELING WARM. YOU ARE FEELING SAFE. YOU ARE HAPPY ABOUT THE ANTIBODIES. THE MORE ANTIBODIES YOU SEE, THE WARMER YOU FEEL – LIKE THE SUN ON YOUR FACE ON A BEACH.”

You even hear his voice when you read that – don’t you? That gravelly, reassuring voice.

It’s VERY intentional.

Focusing on ONE WRONG THING – or even ONE RIGHT THING – is a technique of misdirection, but it is one of the BEST ways of pretending not to know things.

“Let’s only talk about this.”

Rand Paul knows all about it. He has gone many rounds with the Fauci critter.

But it’s not just Fauci.

His protege in CDC, who gives Fauci effective control of medical science, is every bit as bad.

It even includes Rand Paul’s colleagues in Congress.

The man behind the launch of censorship. Is this guy even AMERICAN?

What a PUTZ.

ANYWAY, this is where I started to figure things out.

This WEIRD LOVE of the radical left for brutal, aggressive, stupid, uncaring science – where does it come from?

I did not expect the answer that I found, with the help of Trumpismine and Wikipedia.


Lysenkoism

LINK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

It’s very helpful to read this, including this part:


Marxism–Leninism postulated “universal and immutable laws of history” (historical materialism and dialectical materialism), which assumed unavoidable large-scale change at the collective level of societies.[5]Collectivism was a key feature of Marxism; Darwin’s concept of a random mutation in an individual being able to propagate and transform subsequent generations was at odds with the ideology, and was perceived as having a strong liberal inclination.[6] Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]


Most people brought up in mainstream, establishment, Western science use the term Lysenkoism without really understanding the political angle of it. We understand it merely as “politics being imposed on scientists in the Soviet Union, which set back Soviet biological science by decades.”

Yes, that’s true, but it’s not ALL of the truth. The more you know about it, the more it looks EXACTLY like “Woke Science”.

As an aside, clearly it makes sense WHY China (and to a lesser extent Russia) would want to promote Lysenkoism in the United States, as part of their own interests. “China First” and “Russia First” by socialist and ex-socialist means are unlikely to be pretty. “Fuck the other guy up so he can’t win” is a valid technique in a corrupt world.

But it goes deeper.

Lysenkoism is far less about being STUPID, than about being REVOLUTIONARY. That is a critical idea. That quality of being revolutionary makes mistakes, and when it does, it’s generally STUPID. But when it does NOT make mistakes, it’s generally EVIL.

Let me repeat what I said, earlier about Lysenkoism.


[QUOTE]

Wolf Moon

Wolf Moon Online Admin Coyote Reply to  trumpismine October 18, 2021 02:36

This is EXCELLENT READING!!!

You know what? This is actually really interesting reading.

In a WEIRD WAY – Lysenko was “right”, in that he maniacally predicted EXACTLY what the communists are doing NOW with gene therapy. His assertion of a “genetic dialectic” – of the “evolutionary” in conflict with the “revolutionary” – is actually what we’re seeing RIGHT NOW with the “natural evolution” crowd (US) versus the commie-forced gene therapy crowd (THEM).

Marxist–Leninist theorists presented Lysenkoism as a new branch of biology, arguing that “dialectic method shows that development is carried out in a dual form: evolutionary and revolutionary.” Darwin was attributed with discovering “only the evolutionary” path, while Michurin and Lysenko were presented as making a “great step forward” toward the discovery of a “revolutionary” path of biologic development.[7]

It was just total hubris and pathological commie science – a lot like what we see from Fauci, Gates and Walensky – but it “anticipated” what WOULD come eventually through science – that someday WE would have the power to do the things – and make the mistakes – that we are making now.

So in many ways these people ARE the intellectual inheritors of Lysenkoism!!!

Lysenko’s mistake was claiming that things WERE what they merely COULD BE through greater understanding.

Imagine some person coming BEFORE Galileo and trying to FORCE heliocentrism in their country – killing, jailing, ousting, and attacking the geocentrists.

In a sense, that was Lysenko, who attacked natural evolution.

Natural processes are “evolution”.

Genetic modification is “revolution”.

The dude was a NUT, trying to assert that the NATURAL was both, when it’s almost all ONE. But if he would have simply said “We must become revolutionary in genetics, which is merely evolutionary now”, then he would have been like the Lenin of biology, and he would likely be admired today by all these crazy leftists and depoppers, instead of an old Soviet embarrassment.

But ALL OF THAT comes back and tells me that these people are the modern recapitulation of Lysenkoist THOUGHT, but using the GAINS of actual evolutionary understanding.

The nutbaggery we see NOW with the communist jab-maniacs, is just like Lysenko’s assertions, only MORE REAL because they have MORE TECH.

[END QUOTE]


Soviet science, and Lysenko in particular, were characterized by a kind of VIRTUE SIGNALING, and that is what we are seeing now on universities, only it tends to be about peripheral things, like race, diversity, gender – whatever is in leftist vogue.

But NOW, in our phony socialist “pandemic”, we are seeing the virtue signals rise to levels that affect the practice of science itself. It’s starting at GOALS, but very soon, it will get a bit like CLIMATE LYSENKOISM, where people CHANGE DATA, HIDE DATA, DROP EVIDENCE, and basically act like MAINSTREAM MEDIA JOURNALISTS, who are in a continuous state of covering things up by omission, distraction, and promotion of contradicting narratives.

That is NOT GOOD.

I think that we are now seeing with publications like the one featured in this article, is some PUSH-BACK by scientists who realize where things are headed – a VERY BAD place. They are GETTING THE TRUTH OUT.

We need to help promote awareness of science that CDC and the communist infiltration are going to hide.

W

On August 7, 1948, at the end of a week-long session organised by Lysenko and approved by Stalin,[14] the V.I. Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences announced that from that point on Lysenkoism would be taught as “the only correct theory.” Soviet scientists were forced to denounce any work that contradicted Lysenko.[19] Criticism of Lysenko was denounced as “bourgeois” or “fascist,” and analogous “non-bourgeois” theories also flourished in other fields such as linguistics and art in the Soviet academy at this time. Perhaps the only opponents of Lysenkoism during Stalin’s lifetime to escape liquidation were from the small community of Soviet nuclear physicists: as Tony Judt has observed, “It is significant that Stalin left his nuclear physicists alone and never presumed to second guess their calculations. Stalin may well have been mad but he was not stupid.”[20]

Faucism-Lysenkoism is real. And it’s HERE.

Why All People Must Refuse mRNA Vaccines to End the Worldwide Gain of Function Experiment

We knew it was a snake when we let it in. Now, we all have to kick it out.


In which I argue that WE are the new cell culture for an uncontrolled gain of function experiment, that only WE can end.


It took me a while to figure out WHY they insisted on using the FULL SPIKE PROTEIN for these damn vaccines. This question has bugged me from the very beginning, and it got worse and worse as more and more spike protein side effects piled up.

Thankfully, sleeping late on the morning of 9/12/ 21, I had a DREAM which finally helped me see the answer.

It wasn’t exactly Kekulé’s dream, but it served the same purpose – to accept what I had not yet been able to fully see and accept.

Now, normally I would not mention that ANY of this came from a dream. There is no faster way to lose credibility, than to say “it came from a dream” – other than saying the answer came from the voice of God. But the truth of the matter is that I often find that UNRESOLVED QUESTIONS form what might be called “motifs” in my dreams, and sometimes I actually get some kind of resolution FROM the dreams.

If I tried to explain the dream itself, it would be almost meaningless to you. Things shift and change in dreams. Stone becomes brick becomes concrete and then vanishes. Stairs appear and disappear. People are there and people are gone, to be replaced by different people. One location changes smoothly into another location.

All of THAT is a jumble. This dream was a real doozy, too. Crazy! But in the dream I kept trying to resolve something – actually TWO things – which were composed of collections of ideas. These two things were like little, linear, diagrammatic collections of jewelry boxes, and it was impossible for me to SAY anything useful about the two collections, and how they related to each other, without actually interacting with them and looking into the jewelry boxes in some fashion or another, and in doing so, the collections were no longer separated and isolated from what might be called “everything else”.

It was IMPOSSIBLE for me, in the dream, to separate these things from “everything else”, if I wanted to know anything about their reality.

When I woke up, I realized the point of the dream.

The point of the dream was that the two things – IN REALITY – were both connected not only to each other, but to everything else. The point of the dream was that I needed to look at how the two things EACH interacted with everything else, to see how they were TRULY related to each other.

Not how they were SUPPOSED to be related to each other, but how they are ACTUALLY related to each other.

And THEN – in the “generality” of that moment – I realized that this “model”, if you will, applied to the COVID-19 VIRUSES (one collection) and the mRNA VACCINES (the second collection). And in THAT moment, I stopped looking at them as ANTAGONISTIC things, just because a LIAR named Fauci says they are antagonistic, but instead as SIMILAR and COMPLEMENTARY things.

As genetic material.

THAT is when “IT” hit me.

I woke up fully, and realized the following.


The VIRUSES and the VACCINES are DESIGNED to interact with each other in the realm of “everything else”, that being us humans. They are NOT designed to interact in the way we are being told. They are designed to interact in the way that they ACTUALLY DO interact.


Let me give you a simple representation of this relationship.

Consider a square. Color the top side GREEN – that represents “everything else”, not as it “should” be, but as it REALLY IS. Every point on that line segment is part of the world, relating to other points in the ways that they REALLY DO, in a “green” way. It’s ALL GREEN.

Now make the bottom two CORNER POINTS the two collections. Connect those points to the top of the square by green lines – the left and right sides of the square. Again, this is how they REALLY connect.

We are being TOLD that the bottom side of the square is RED.

Why should we believe that? What if it’s NOT red? What if it’s GREEN? What if there is a simpler GREEN ANSWER?

And IMMEDIATELY I knew what the GREEN ANSWER WAS.


The mRNA “vaccines” encoding a spike protein are designed to do in HUMANS containing the virus exactly the same thing that similarly added spike protein mRNA does in CELL CULTURES containing the virus. They are designed to CHANGE THE VIRUS – to make it GAIN FUNCTION. ALL that is needed to create the new virus is an otherwise identical injection with a NEW CODE that GAINS FUNCTION.

In other words, genetic vaccines offer an opportunity to smoothly regulate the rate and direction of evolution of the virus, without humanity knowing it. And they do it IN THE ANIMAL HOST INTENDED.


This solved many mysteries, which I will explain shortly.

This told me that there is ZERO need to go off and create a new variant in a lab. All one has to do is to change the code of the vaccine mRNA, and PRESTO – a new variant is introduced “in the wild”, with almost no chance of getting caught.

At this point, many of you are doing a WTF, so let me back up and explain this again.

What science does to “create a new virus” in the laboratory, from RNA or DNA, is to “somehow” (COUGH, COUGH, COUGH) get the RNA or DNA that they want to get into the NEW VIRUS, into laboratory cell cultures that are making OLD VIRUS. They need to get it into the cells, pretty much like they get the vaccine mRNA into our cells, using nanotech or virus vectors. THEN, the “old virus process” slips the “new genetic instructions” into the old protein shell, but as the virus spreads and multiplies, IF there is any “gain of function”, then the NEW INSTRUCTIONS in the NEW protein shell will WIN, and the result will be THE NEW VIRUS with GAIN OF FUNCTION.

Nobody really wants to spell out all the details of gain of function techniques in public, just like they don’t want to give the directions of how to make high explosives to terrorists. But THAT KNOWLEDGE IS OUT THERE, and we know roughly HOW THEY DO IT.

LINK: https://archive.md/V0Dfn

Honestly, it’s a bit like plant grafting, only instead of being largely in the Z DIRECTION (up), it’s in the T DIRECTION (time). You GRAFT new instructions into an old virus, until the new virus TAKES.

What they have done here is to create a PLATFORM for genetic change. Eventually it will be used to change US, but for the moment, they are clearly using it to CHANGE THE VIRUS (which is used to help change us, albeit somewhat indirectly).

Now – I said that this solved many mysteries. I’m going to list them here.


Why the full spike protein in the vaccines, despite its toxicity, and the greater likely safety of vaccines based on smaller subunits like the RBD?

Because the full spike is the main part of the virus that they’ve been changing, and which “gains function”. To get a new virus with a new spike, you have to change the instructions for the spike that get encoded in the virus. Also because you want to include the genetic instructions for ONE OR MORE FULL PIECES of the virus, if not the entire virus. That depends on exactly how the virus builds. We know (the Jaenisch paper) that the virus uploads fragments of its own RNA into the genomic DNA of the host, which come back out and are transcribed to RNA, so it will presumably do the same to pieces of the vaccine when both are present. Viruses that build from the vaccine spike variants will tend to WIN if they have gained function.


RBD_Regional_Antigenic_Vaccine_quadrupol-Mutante-3.png
RBD_Regional_Antigenic_Vaccine_quadrupol-Mutante-3.png

Why mRNA vaccines, despite the obvious safety advantages of protein vaccines?

Because protein is GENETICALLY SAFE – and that is NOT what they want. If the human population is now the experimental platform for virus gain-of-function experimentation, then only by being able to inject us with mRNA or DNA will viruses be able to be swiftly and decisively modified IN VIVO.

Short answer – they are not trying to change OUR genes yet – but they ARE trying to change viruses IN US. In vivo. And not in a way for our own good.


Why did they fight so hard against short-protein subunit vaccines like those from Winfried Stöcker and Sorrento?

Because if those vaccines are clearly superior to genetic vaccines due to safety or efficacy, then the conspirators will LOSE THEIR PLATFORM for genetic modification of viruses IN VIVO in the human population. Thus, these likely safer subunit and PROTEIN vaccines encountered delay after delay, and roadblock after roadblock, and in the case of the Stöcker vaccine, threats of arrest and legal trouble.


Why is Ralph Baric now doing work on chimeric mRNA vaccines that include LONGER mRNA encoding MULTIPLE proteins from SARS-CoV-2?

Because this approach toward longer and more mRNA leads closer to what they need to do – to inject us with the complete instructions for modified viruses – basically as what are called “virus-like particles” (VLPs), or by using viral vectors. These are “Fauci-compliant” in that they are “all about more and more antibodies”, and thus follow Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis” act, but clearly they will have more and more side effects, possibly including ADE.

As you can see, the vaccines are “less and less about natural immunity”, less and less about individual health, and more and more about experimentation and sociobiological engineering.


What does this have to do with Judy Mikovits?

Judy is one of the few people who have honestly explained the GAMES that the Faucists are playing with gain of function.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B17QQTr6xY

She explained that what these people have done – in complete violation of the CONTROLS that were placed on genetic engineering back in the 1970s – is to FORCE VIRUSES to “take” in human cells, allegedly in order to “see if they can or cannot take in human cells”. They are basically saying “we have to try hard to change the liquid to make the liquid catch fire, to see if it’s flammable”. This is a special kind of dishonesty.

There are MANY ways to make a virus “gain function”, but one of the FIRST and SIMPLEST is to just use tricks to make it change enough on its own, to eventually “take” in human cell culture.

It’s a lot like Nancy Pelosi and Obamacare – “you have to pass it to see what’s in it”. That is a special kind of cynical dishonesty, IMO.

But NOW they have actually HIDDEN gain of function research in PLAIN SIGHT. In us. Thanks to genetic vaccines.


Why did Adam Schiff go after Natural News and get them deplatformed?

Because the greatest danger to their plan is that humans will reject the future of human genetic modification IN VIVO. Natural News and their movement are a focal point of organized opposition. The Democrats KNEW this was coming, and they wanted the opposition out of the way.

This is also why so much work goes into discrediting these people.


But if the vaccine is for the SAME spike protein as in the virus, then how is THAT gain of function?

It’s NOT. It is ONLY if the vaccine contains DIFFERENT genetic material, DIFFERENT instructions, that any possibility for CHANGING the virus ensues.

Now tell me how you are going to go into EVERY vaccine that is given ANYWHERE in the world, and make sure that the mRNA doesn’t encode a new variant?

You can’t. That’s the evil genius of this plot.

If I want to introduce a variant ANYWHERE, all I have to do is give out a vaccine at the target location, where my vaccine looks just like the official stuff – or maybe even IS official stuff – but mine contains whatever genetic data is needed for a new virus, inside the same old nanotechnology.

You see – WE. HUMANS. OURSELVES. ARE. NOW. THE. GAIN-OF-FUNCTION. PLATFORM.

Pretty slick, if you ask me.


Could this platform be used for ADE as an intended effect?

Yes – because the variant that challenges prior antibodies is controlled by whoever launches the variant – and if that person or group is the same one controlling the vaccines, then TOUGH LUCK. And the ADE could be pinpointed in space and time, pretty much like Stalin’s Holmodor against the middle class in Ukraine. This platform of viral control can be used to control people at the individual, family, local, regional, state, national, continental, and global levels.


If we stop using these vaccines, will the variants stop?

They might stop. It will become much harder for the variants to appear, whether they are natural, and arise from vaccine evolutionary pressure, or are man-made, and require the vaccines for delivery.

Some of the best early opinions, IMO, thought that the initial genetic drift of SARS-CoV-2 was sufficiently small, that a single vaccination would cover all likely variants. While I’m not highly confident in that thought any more, I think it indicates that drift would be small, were it not for the vaccine.


So which is the plot – the virus or the vaccine?

AND logic – it’s BOTH OF THEM – the message of the dream. And it’s BOTH OF THEM in the SAME context that it would be in HUMAN CELLS. We are just “human cells on the hoof”.

The virus is out – and now they can change it “in the wild” thanks to GENETIC VACCINES – the greatest cover for genetic experimentation on viruses and humans that was ever conceived.


So how do we stop this plot?

Easy. We utterly reject genetic vaccines as a RISKY PLATFORM FOR TREATING VIRAL DISEASE, because they can be used to manipulate the disease and the diseased. The risks are not just individual – they are SOCIETAL as well. So we make them highly illegal. To get there, we use CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE FIRST. We REFUSE genetic vaccines.

For those who want vaccines, we go to old-school, time-tested, PLOT-SCUTTLING, protein vaccines. And all VOLUNTARY.

We don’t call this a RELIGIOUS objection. We are honest and call it a MORAL OBJECTION. If, however, your CHURCH OR SYNAGOGUE takes up the sword of abolition, and adheres to the morality of rejecting genetic vaccines, e.g., as considering them a form of “tempting the devil”, then you CAN validly call it a religious objection, too.

However, as an ETHICAL objection, like the objection to SLAVERY, all humans can take part.

Make no mistake – we are now in a literal HUMAN GAIN OF FUNCTION EXPERIMENT, using the whole human population as test subjects, and genetic vaccines as the obvious GOF vector.

The only way to STOP THE EXPERIMENT COLD, is to STOP USING GENETIC VACCINES.

Simple. Don’t let the snake in. Or if you HAVE let it in, kick it out!!!

W

Let The Storm Pass Over – and Prepare for Amazing Days

I had just been thinking about matters of DC and the likelihood that President Trump already invoked the Insurrection Act some time after the Stolen Election – and probably much sooner than we realized – when THIS NEW INFORMATION came to my attention.

Hold off on viewing it, until I explain this a bit more.

This is an hour-long podcast by Mike Adams of Natural News.

Mike was personally kicked off Twitter and Facebook by the gelatinous monster Adam Schiff.

InfoWars (Alex Jones) and Natural News (Mike Adams) were both the FIRST and PRIMARY targets of the BEGINNING of the social media censorship which we are ALL experiencing now.

“Vaccine misinformation” was a pretext for Schiff to force / enable the social media TYRANTS to remove Mike Adams, in my opinion. But it was MUCH BIGGER than coronavirus vaccines. Much bigger than vaccines in general. Much bigger than any of that.

It was about NOW.

Mike Adams is, in my opinion, one of the best scientists out there – willing to stand up to the politically forced scientific opinions which theoretically don’t exist, but which in fact DOMINATE the most contentious parts of science – particularly where MONEY and POWER intersect.

My first indication that this guy had real chops was his acoustic analysis of the bullet audio from crowd videos of the Las Vegas shootings. When even the Las Vegas Sheriff and Chief of Police could not speak freely, under the hawk-like watch of the FBI, sticking to a single-shooter theory MASSIVELY contradicted and discredited by witnesses, and while even FBI scientists failed to provide even the slightest refutation other than “health nut smears”, Mike Adams VALIDATED the first shooter and PROVED A SECOND by an impressively SIMPLE and easily explained audio analysis.

LINK: https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10-11-health-ranger-acoustic-forensic-evidence-proves-more-than-one-shooter-at-vegas-massacre.html

Sadly, the video has been utterly scrubbed from the internet, but – well – copies do exist, let’s just say! Maybe they will find their way back to us when Silicon Valley is dealt with vis-a-vis the FIRST AMENDMENT.


ANYWAY, now we come to the issue at hand. “Somebody” just came to Mike Adams and told him things which blew him away. Mike is only able to HINT at these things for now, but they apparently are HUGE.

It is more by reading between the LINES of what Mike says that you will get a clearer picture of WHO came to him, WHY they came to him, WHAT they told him, and more.

WHEN and WHERE are more certain.

Mike says that we need to STAY HOME on January 19 and 20.

DO NOT go to Washington, DC.

DO NOT go to your state capitols.

Now – I don’t want to influence your perceptions of the video. I want you to watch it NOW.

You don’t have to watch much – Mike puts the IMPORTANT STUFF right up front, to make sure you get the information. You don’t have to watch more than 15 minutes to get what I want to discuss.

Here it is again:


Here is the page URL, if the embedded video gives you any trouble:

LINK: https://www.brighteon.com/d3a3792e-8d5d-4990-868a-87566077c09c


To me it is completely clear WHO came to Mike Adams – somebody who represents authorities that will be providing him with AUTHORITATIVE INFORMATION and thus bypassing the TREASON MEDIA. Mike is careful not to say who came to him, but whoever they are, they have some kind of significant authority, IMO.

It is also clear to me that WHY these authorities came to Mike – because his podcast audience now exceeds some limit which makes it a useful channel to reach people – AND Mike is a known patriot, whether people agree with his views on health matters and medicine or not.

WHAT exactly they told him, is almost certainly interesting to the point of being AMAZING. Mike summed it up by saying “Lin Wood is right” – and that he (Mike) has been converted from a “Lin Wood skeptic” to a “Lin Wood believer”.

You think the President’s LAWYER on the ELECTION might have to be READ IN on the most sensitive information about the ELECTION? Make sense NOW?

NOW – if you keep listening to the podcast, you will hear “echoes of Q”, and Mike will admit that he was not a “Q follower”, but that much of what Q told us is, surprisingly to him, TRUE.

Yeah.

If it’s not all becoming clear now, let the comments below help you!

W

H/T Sauce for bringing this to my attention HERE.

Dear KMAG: 20201002 Open Topic / ACB vs. The Climate Commies / Bolshevism Does NOT Equal Judaism (DUH)

Free speech, yada, yada, yada. But don’t give Komrade Kamala any excuses to shut us down. This has been addressed elsewhere.

YOU KNOW THE DRILL.

Give them nothing but one more day to rue, and the wailing and gnashing of teeth.

https://twitter.com/SharylAttkisson/status/1309343655447146498

Remain CIVIL and possibly even GENTEEL.

Today, we have only TWO SHORT LESSONS in WOLFTHINK.


ACB vs. The Climate Commies

The following is an extremely important article – and more reason why the left will go nuts on ACB.

Barrett’s views pose challenge to climate regulations

by Abby Smith, Energy and Environment Reporter | | September 26, 2020 06:23 PM

LINK: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/barretts-views-pose-challenge-to-climate-regulations

First the introduction:

Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump’s new Supreme Court nominee, is a reliable conservative juror likely to take a narrow reading of the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to control carbon emissions.

That view, shared by several of her future conservative colleagues on the high court, could make it challenging for a Joe Biden administration to push the bounds on tackling climate change through the federal agencies without new legislation from Congress.

After several paragraphs of scaremongering, the money quotes – the substance – are at the end:

Barrett, like her former boss Scalia, is what’s known in the legal world as a “textualist,” believing that the Constitution and other statutes should be interpreted with the original intent of the text in mind. It’s a more rigid interpretation than some more liberal jurors, who see the Constitution as a living document, the interpretation of which can evolve and adapt over time.

Legal observers have suggested that Barrett could also take a more limited view of how much leeway the courts should offer to federal agencies in interpreting ambiguities in the law.

A 1984 Supreme Court doctrine, known as Chevron deference, generally allows agencies to interpret their own authority if the statute is unclear, so long as that interpretation is “reasonable.” Conservative justices such as Justice Neil Gorsuch, another textualist, have openly questioned that doctrine.

Reconsidering or limiting Chevron deference could further narrow the authority of federal agencies, which is particularly important for climate change, a subject that environmental statutes such as the Clean Air Act are largely silent on.

Any Coney Barrett is going to be KEY in reining in the Soviet Deep State which took over SCIENCE during the tenure of Soviet dupe Jimmy Carter.

Allow me to explain.

Part 1 – Media Control of Science

Notice in the first Trump-Biden debate, that Chris Wallace tried to CORNER Trump on his disagreement with MEDIA-CONTROLLED SCIENCE on the subject of “climate change”.

Media control of science is a KEY CONCEPT that most Americans are absolutely unaware of.

Most Americans simply do not understand that….

The MEDIA dictates scientific opinion, not the other way around.

Yes, you heard that right.

Opinion is a SOCIAL PROCESS, and SOCIALISM understands how to control opinion – EVEN scientific opinion.

But but but but but……..

Yes, it’s true that, for most of science which is not of concern to socialism, the only media control is political and not strictly science-related – to make scientists swear fealty to whatever racial and gender concepts are “in vogue” and “required” to get a job.

However, it gets worse from there.

Some science which conflicts with socialist GOALS and DOCTRINES – which can even be FALSE for political reasons – must be controlled. Studies on race and gender are, under American socialism, subject to control. Thinking on LGBT was CHANGED BY POLITICS – not by science.

In fact, that is a good place for me to note something very important.

MEDIA CONTROL OF SCIENCE is easiest on contentious issues where SCIENCE does NOT have a definitive answer. This is the easiest place for POLITICIZED SCIENCE to come through with answers, when real science cannot.

Ironically, CLIMATE was identified as a powerful social manipulator, but poorly understood in the long range. It was PERFECT for socialist control of people.

Where we should have slow and patient science, not having answers yet, socialists have instead “incubated” a kind of “cuckoo’s egg” science in its place. This “Fake Science” offers simple, “fear-is-a-virtue” answers in an area that is contentious, so it is very difficult for rational people to “shout down” a MEDIA which chooses the fear-mongering answer for POLITICAL OR FINANCIAL REASONS.

Now, there ARE more legitimate reasons for the “state” to control science, although this is abused as well. Some science which has profound implications – military, economic, or technological – must also be controlled. Certain things are NOT allowed to be discussed in the open literature.

However, climate and environmental science are NOT in that category. At least, not MUCH is in that category.

Note that SOCIAL FORCES were used by activists to control first environment (legitimate, but over-regulated ON PURPOSE) and then “climate” – the latter being a complete scam. Trump GETS THIS DEEPLY.

Let’s go back and look at what ACB will likely be UNDOING.

Part 2 – Soviet-Imposed Socialist Controls Through Science

Remember “Earth Day”? Oh, I do. I was a SHILL for it, in my youth.

I Was A Teenage Scare Wolf!

The most amazing ideological child abuse recollection of our time! ADMISSION Eventually, it had to come out. I – notorious anticommunist Wolf Moon – was a communist SHILL as a youth. Of course, I didn’t realize at the time that I was shilling for communism, and perhaps other things, both good and bad, but that …

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/09/03/i-was-a-teenage-scare-wolf/

Yup. I SHILLED FOR EARTH DAY. This was not uncommon. This was every bit as political as having students protest against weirdly coincidental and sketchy “gun violence”, except that “saving the environment” seemed like such a nice thing – how could it be political? How could it be bad? How could it be dangerous?

BUT IT WAS. We simply didn’t see the END GAME.

Consider how far socialists moved in just 6-10 years, from the cultural victory of installing “Earth Day” on the centennial of Lenin’s B[earthday] in 1970, to being able to control American industry without even a congressional hearing, through Carter’s EPA bureaucracy in 1980.

Ten years.

Nixon was cornered. Ford was irrelevant. Carter was controlled. Reagan was deceived.

In just a few short years, the Soviets and China had significant control of the United States by INFILTRATION, NOT INVASION.

Cornered Opposition: Understanding The History of Dragon Fuckage with The Eagle

If you want to play in the big leagues, you have to know what strategies the other side plays TIME and TIME and TIME again. COUGH. Knowing that the FAKE NEWS is actually on China’s side helps. Knowing that the FAKE NEWS has been there a LONG, LONG TIME helps even more. Playing long ball …

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/08/24/cornered-opposition-understanding-the-history-of-dragon-fuckage-with-the-eagle/

If we go back to STATED, WRITTEN, AGREED INTENT of the law, then you had better believe that nobody in America was thinking that unelected bureaucrats regulating CARBON DIOXIDE as a “pollutant” was a good idea, much less part of the deal.

And yet, here we are. American industry HOBBLED BY FALSEHOODS.

JIMMY. CARTER. WAS. A. STALINIST. DUPE.

Carter imposed everything the Soviets needed to bring America to heel, because the Soviets UNDERSTOOD HIM DEEPLY. They had forces in place in the Democrat Party and in Carter’s personal life to make Carter do the right thing FROM THEIR POINT OF VIEW.

The Soviets and the AMERICAN MEDIA – which they influenced from behind – were able to get Americans to install a SOVIET BUREAUCRACY. Then, through CARTER JUDGES and CLINTON JUDGES, as well as CLINTON APPOINTEES, they were able to get this bureaucracy to grab more power than the laws ever intended for it to have.

Yes – JUDICIAL LEGISLATION. Part of the outcome of ROTATING BRANCH FUNCTIONS into an UNAMERICAN CONFIGURATION.

C3: How DNC Communists ROTATED Governmental Branch Functions as a Form of Institutional Sabotage

This is actually beautiful. daughnworks247 saw the beautiful thought that led to this larger realization, on today’s thread about Lisa Page and David Bowdich, which was inspired by Sundance’s post on the same revelations. The same post in text, for our low-vision readers…. daughnworks247January 12, 2019 at 12:31 pm Hey, the whole “Gross Negligence” is …

https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/01/12/c3-how-dnc-communists-rotated-governmental-branch-functions-as-a-form-of-institutional-sabotage/
  • Judges legislating.
  • Legislators investigating.
  • Investigators judging.

See how that works?

SULLIVAN. SCHIFF. COMEY. It’s all WRONG, because they MADE IT WRONG. It’s a brilliant way to GAIN UNCONSTITUTIONAL POWERS.

There is only ONE PLACE to undo this damage – in SCOTUS. This is why the left is now absolutely opposed to undoing the DAMAGE that bench-legislating Carter and Clinton judges did, when they exceeded their authority and assisted the bureaucracy in accruing illegitimate power (bureaucrats JUDGING).

Part 3 – The Solution: Judicial Reset

President Trump and Mitch McConnell pulled off one of the greatest tactical “legal resets” in history, by making Obama hesitate to pass judges, waiting for a Hillary Clinton presidency. By THWARTING THAT CHEAT ELECTION and KEEPING THE SENATE, every judge which would have been appointed by corrupt Hillary Clinton was instead appointed by President Trump.

You don’t think there was a plan? THERE WAS A PLAN.

At this point, the RAGING LEFT can do nothing but threaten to install more corrupt judges by PACKING THE COURTS. That’s COURTS, PLURAL.

To do that, they will have to win the election.

GOOD LUCK, TRAITORS.

Meanwhile, we need to get RECOVERY JUDGES on SCOTUS. Amy Coney Barrett is merely number three. There will be more. But in the meanwhile, we must defend Judge Barrett – soon to be Justice Barrett – with every ounce of energy we have!

GET YOUR T-SHIRTS!!!

You can buy one RIGHT HERE:

LINK: https://secure.winred.com/nrsc/notorious-acb

And now – let’s talk BOLSHEVIKS – like VALERIE JARRETT.


Bolshevism ≠ Judaism

One would THINK it was not necessary to deal with the idea that WORDS GENERALLY MEAN WHAT THEY MEAN AND NOT SOMETHING ELSE, but the sad fact is that there is so much “code” in the world of extremist ideologies like radical socialism, and in the racial and religious obsessions like antisemitism, and worse still in their propaganda and accusations, that one has to sometimes remind people how to distinguish lying propaganda from reality when BIG LIES hover nearby.

When Bolsheviks and antisemites are “on the ropes”, they will both REACH for conflation as a final defense.

It takes CLARITY and unforgiving truthfulness to put this crap down.

So before I get to the latest revival of the old accusation by antisemites that “Bolsheviks = Jews”, let’s look at an easier, similar case that was recently beaten down the other way.

Let’s go back momentarily to one of the more recent conflation defenses – the idea that that criticism of “globalism” was “antisemitic”. In other words, this defense stated that “globalists” was code for “Jews”.

I always loved to shoot down that one, because it was just so easy. Most of the top “globalists” are clearly NOT Jews, starting (as I love to start) with one of the most outrageous globalists of all, Barack Hussein Obama, and running through every Obama hack and European leader one can imagine. Lagarde, Merkel, Hillary, Mogherini, I mean, you almost have to drag out Sarkozy – barely a globalist, in my opinion, to even get a live Jew in the bunch.

Kissinger? Yeah. I will give you that one. And like globalism, we’re talking “almost expired”.

OK, one may say. What about financiers and billionaires? There surely have to be some Jewish globalists there – right?

Soros? In my opinion, definitely a globalist, but not exactly a coherent one. He seems more of an outright socialist to me – even some kind of communist tool, but let’s just call him a globalist anyway – maybe even a stereotypical one. We expect globalists to include a lot of people, and OMG there will be some Jews in the bunch. Even at the top.

Whoops! Sorry – must have been the headgear. *WINK*

Seriously – most “globalists” simply aren’t Jews, just like most people aren’t Jews. There may be some people who use the word as code, but it’s bad code, and the word “globalist” REMAINS USEFUL for precisely what it means – people who believe in some kind of global government that erases national sovereignty. Stated as plainly as possible, the vast majority of globalists – and even most of the top ones – are NOT JEWS.

Please note – in this case, GLOBALISTS and DEFENDERS OF GLOBALISM were attacking opponents of globalism by raising a false “antisemitism defense“.

This is EXTREMELY COMMON on the left. There is even a Twitter bot called “Antisemitism Cow” that people can tag to “moo” if, in “its” judgment, somebody is an “antisemite”. What it actually does is precisely what it’s name is – it “cows” people into toeing the line on leftist propaganda about what is antisemitic and what is not.

I hope you will stop and get the cunning of that – the sick joke. This is a bot that cows people with bogus accusations of antisemitism, called “Antisemitism Cow”. How cute. Most people don’t STOP and question it – instead, they COWER. Ha-ha – MY JOKE.

I’ve called “Antisemitism Cow” a BOLSHEVIK to its face, and that leads precisely to the next topic.

This “antiglobalism = antisemitism” meme can be played backwards and in reverse, and confronting THAT particular fallacy is today’s message.

Now – one would THINK that it’s entirely obvious that Bolsheviks include pretty much anybody who falls for the scam of Bolshevism – meaning violent communism.

Granted, Bolshevism is not much worse than other kinds of communism (see lying, cheating, sneaking Mensheviks and Trotskyists), but it means what it means – actual, live, honest-to-God BOLSHEVIKS – communists who advocate stealthy and EVENTUALLY violent revolution to secure a communist state. They will LIE about the stealth and the violence as well.

Antifa and BLM are BOLSHEVIKS.

Now, Antifa members – most of whom are NOT JEWS – will whip out the “antisemitism” accusation and defense against their enemies pretty fast, but BLM includes a LOT of blatant and vociferous antisemites, so overall, these organizations demonstrate – IN MY OPINION – that antisemitism and Judaism are pretty much orthogonal (i.e., unrelated) to Bolshevism.

HOWEVER – as with “globalism”, there are people who try to conflate these things. Bolsheviks will dodge, like globalists, behind the “antisemitism defense”.

But it also plays the other way.

Extremely blatant antisemites (who I observe on Gab) will now proudly and unequivocally equate Bolsheviks with Jews. If you push back with counterexamples and evidence that this is absurd, because the vast majority of Bolsheviks simply ARE NOT JEWS, they will ultimately fold down to the accusation that Bolshevism is a “Jewish plot”. And there you have it. That is how you know what you’re dealing with.

The people who push it are NOT standard right or left. They are almost always outright, unabashed, proud antisemites. Most are somewhat on the right but tend to hate or diminish Trump as a supporter of Israel – others are “national socialists” and push socialism with extreme racial aspects. The common thread is raw, naked antisemitism. That is the core of where they are coming from.

At this point, it’s very important to remember that many of the strongest anti-communists are either Jews or huge defenders of Judaism and Israel. If Bolshevism is a Jewish plot of some kind, the plotters sure sent a lot of very effective uncontrolled opposition to the other side.

Horowitz? Levin? Bolsonaro? Miller? Goldenberg? Ashman? Prager? TRUMP?

Sorry – there are WAY too many Jews who are on the front lines against Bolshevism for this argument to wash.

This is where I think we have to simply push back on such people – just like we did on the other end of the other fallacy.

Bolsheviks are Bolsheviks. Any other usage or insinuation is filled with agenda and deception.

Pushing back does not necessarily mean engaging these antisemites directly – these are often very nasty people. But it does mean countering their message.

As I hope I have done right here and now.

I see these people as part of the division – the stuff Q is warning us about. They use the “big lie” technique, even though they are small fry. They just push these memes over and over until they get people to “accept the code” at a subconscious level.

Don’t fall for it.

In my opinion there will likely be some attempt, at some point, to paint QAnon as either antisemitic, a Jewish plot, or both, depending upon the audience, merely because these are the final defenses of the guilty. Don’t fall for it, don’t back down. WE MEAN WHAT WE SAY. End of story. Q means what Q says. End of story.

DEMAND AND EMBRACE CLARITY – NOT CODE OR ALLEGATIONS THEREOF.

We are getting into the nastiest part of the storm. Buckle up.


Have a great weekend! And let’s MAGA!

W

Freedom is worth fighting for.

Dear KMAG: 20200710 Open Topic / Second CCP (Control of Coronavirus Perception)

This FREEDOM FROM FAUCI FASCISM AND FEAR FRIDAY open thread is OPENVERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA / KAG! / KMAG world (KMAG being a bit of both MAGA and KAG!).


https://youtu.be/kFD5sQjIyGg

You can say what you want, comment on what other people said, and so on.

Free Speech is practiced here. ENJOY IT. Use it or lose it.

Keep it SOMEWHAT civil. They tried to FORCE fake Orwellian civility on us. In response, we CHOOSE true civility to defend our precious FREEDOM from THEM.

Our rules began with the civility of the Old Treehouse, later to become the Wolverinian Empire, and one might say that we have RESTORED THE OLD REPUBLIC – the early high-interaction model of the Treehouse – except of course that Q discussion is not only allowed but encouraged, and speech is considerably freer in other ways. Please feel free to argue and disagree with the board owner, as nicely as possible.

Please also consider the Important Guidelines, outlined here in the OLD January 1st , 2019 open thread. Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven.


SPEAK THE FIVE WORDS BOLDLY TO OUR PRESIDENT!

I AM PRAYING FOR YOU!


AND WHAT TIME IS IT?

TIME TO….

DRAIN THE SWAMP

Our movement

Is about replacing

A failed

And CORRUPT

Political establishment

With a new government controlled

By you, the American People.

Candidate Donald J. Trump

Also remember Wheatie’s Rules:

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

Second CCP

If you’re familiar with the Isaac Asimov “Foundation” series, then you are familiar with the grand plot device of “The Foundation”, which is later rebooted by the exciting idea of a hidden “Second Foundation”.

Here, I steal the meme, and apply it to all of China’s slightly hidden enablers, by calling out what they are doing on China’s behalf to HELP CHINA SAVE THEIR ASSES:

Control of Coronavirus Perspective (CCP)

The corona magnification hoax was their BIG, desperate info-nuke to “get Trump”. Very easy to see NOW, but most of us are not as SOLID as we should be, in getting a TRUE perspective on COVID-19.

The fact is, the left is doing everything it can to PSY-OP you on not only COVID-19, but coronaviruses in general. They are working very hard to keep both individuals and society focused on a MYTH – not REALITY.

TWO resources will help get rid of THEIR CONTROL of YOUR PERSPECTIVE.

RESET YOUR CORONAVIRUS PERSPECTIVE

Here is the first.

To begin countering the MIND-FRACK that the Soviet American media, Soviet Deep State, China, Controlled Industry, and Soviet Dems have done on you, regarding the “novel [HOW MUCH?] coronavirus”, it helps to just consider some other [MORE FAMILIAR] possibilities, so that you can see what makes more sense – a new and very Hollywood story, or what we knew before about coronaviruses.

Begin here, with the article by Beda M. Stadtler (image above) which swept social media:

LINK: https://medium.com/@vernunftundrichtigkeit/coronavirus-why-everyone-was-wrong-fce6db5ba809

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/8rLzi

Here is the introduction, as an image.

Here is the text version of the introduction.

Coronavirus: Why everyone was wrong

The immune response to the virus is stronger than everyone thought

Back to Reason
Jul 1 · 12 min read

The original article was published in the Swiss magazine Weltwoche (World Week) on June 10th. The author, Beda M Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and professor emeritus. Stadler is an important medical professional in Switzerland, he also likes to use provoking language, which should not deter you from the extremely important points he makes.

This article is about Switzerland and it does not suggest that the situation is exactly the same globally. I am advocating for local measures according to locale situations. And I advocate for looking at real data rather than abstract models. I also suggest to read to the end, because Stadler makes crucial points about testing for Sars-CoV-2.

Read the article that follows. It seems SHOCKINGLY REASONABLE. It is from a person who is a former director of an institute of immunology.

Medium, which censors stuff like this all the time, would have censored this if they COULD HAVE. The problem is that Beda Stadtler is too credentialed, and nobody in science is willing to say he’s wrong and likely get their ass handed to them.

So instead, Medium adds THIS at the top, in small letters:

Anyone can publish on Medium per our Policies, but we don’t fact-check every story. For more info about the coronavirus, see cdc.gov.

Medium then adds THIS at the bottom:


Stay up to date on coronavirus (Covid-19)

Follow the Medium Coronavirus Blog or sign up for the newsletter to read expert-backed coronavirus stories from Medium and across the web, such as:


Yup, that’s our media.

Just read the article. You will start to see several important points about IMMUNITY in general, and coronaviruses in particular. You will start to see COVID-19 as YET ANOTHER WEAK CORONAVIRUS.

You will start to see that Americans ARE protected from the virus, NATURALLY, and that is why there are so many “asymptomatic” cases, weak cases, and people who “seem immune” because [DRUM ROLL] THEY ARE IMMUNE – through exposure to similar, related coronaviruses earlier in life.

THEN watch the YouTube video I showcased earlier, by Dr. Kelly Victory, MD.

https://youtu.be/kFD5sQjIyGg

This video may or may not get taken down by the Wojcicki sisters. Dr. Victory is actually a professional disaster adviser of businesses, on topics including pandemics. It is difficult if not impossible to question what she says. It doesn’t matter, however, since this video will show up somewhere else if it is taken down.

This doctor is a voice of reason and VACCINE REALISM. She begins to frame the most fundamental questions about vaccines, and takes us BACK to medicine’s understanding of vaccines BEFORE THE MEDIA BEGAN TO PSY-OP US ON THEM.

She is right there with Trump. Why are our children being protected from IMMUNITY THEY NEED, and CAN GET SAFELY RIGHT NOW?

The media and Democrats seem obsessed with making sure children DON’T GAIN NATURAL IMMUNITY.

WHY? Are Democrats, as they always do, trying to CREATE A CONTROLLING PROBLEM? Are they trying to create a useful problem (see “global warming” and then “climate change”) using BAD FINANCIAL INCENTIVES? Is VACCINDRA the next SOLYNDRA?

From here, we examine a POWERFUL MEME.


What If COVID-19 Is “Just Another Coronavirus”?

Let’s start here, with an amazing meme that will blow your mind.

I want you to stop and think about this. PRIORITIES. Why are we letting the MEDIA set them?

This “shocking” fact about COVID-19 is not unreasonable, because (1) real numbers support it, and (2) this is the reality of the normal endemic weak coronaviruses, and why “coronavirus” was not a household name before the China-Democrat COVID psy-op. FLU was a much more targeted target because it simply IS a more important target.

One of the PRIOR coronas came from bats, most likely (2 of them came from mammals, and 2 from birds, IIRC). But what we have with COVID-19 is almost certainly a LAB-MEDIATED SPECIES JUMP.

We even know WHEN and WHERE.

LINK: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8302739/Cellphone-location-data-analysis-Wuhan-virology-lab-suggests-hazardous-event-October-shutdown.html

Remember – it really IS the “China Virus”. Well, other than THIS ONE.

Now – let me repeat that meme. INTERNALIZE IT.

Thanks to gudthots for posting this BRILLIANT meme, along with the following excellent comment about things michaelh said:

gudthots
July 9, 2020 at 01:28
Michael pointed out that vaccines for non-lethal illnesses are not prioritized. I think that is because vaccines can be lethal and you don’t want a cure that’s worse than the disease.

If we DID prioritize flu and coronavirus, and if flu (voluntary vaccine) is HIGHER priority than coronavirus, then why would we want a mandatory vaccine for coronavirus?

You see? It all falls apart, once you see this.

Does “Nursing Home Killer Cuomo” now make sense? The whole plot to use MEDICAL SOCIALISM to enact SOCIALISM depended on ENOUGH DEATHS.

What Does Bill Gates Want?

Finally, let’s look BACK at Bill Gates from the vantage point of “OMG – we have another coronavirus, and we are even experiencing cross-over immunity, as we should have expected. Do we really need a vaccine?”

Here are two things to understand.

Bill Gates is now studying Karl Rove and David Axelrod

Yes, that is an ugly thought. “Win for the UniParty. Don’t simply do the right thing.”

LINK: https://www.fastcompany.com/90523466/heres-what-bill-gates-is-reading-and-binging-during-the-covid-19-pandemic

That link is a quick read. Bill Gates’ reading list is always good intelligence on him.

Note that the top book is “How To Lie With Statistics“. The rest of his reading list (that one is #16) is just as interesting.

LINK: https://www.blinkist.com/magazine/posts/a-long-list-of-books-recommended-by-bill-gates

NOW – it’s time to get very serious about Gates.

Remember when SCHIFFTY SCHIFF asked for social media to “do something about vaccine misinformation”? That turned out to be CODE for “kick Natural News and InfoWars off social media”.

Well, Bill Gates just did the same thing.

The video interview is HERE.

LINK: https://www.fastcompany.com/video/watch-bill-gates-talks-about-when-we-might-get-a-covid-19-vaccine-and-why-wearing-a-mask-is-essential-right-now/IbfRl1bT

Start listening to the video around 3:30 to get Gates’ full thought. He is CONCERNED that low American compliance with the MASKS will lead to low compliance with the VACCINE. He wants social media to FIX THIS #### NOW.

None of these people is interested in natural immunity – EVEN if natural immunity is MORE EFFECTIVE and BETTER FOR HUMANITY.

NOW – it’s VERY interesting to hear Bill Gates, assisted by his shill interviewer, go after the “conspiracy” theories, which [SHOCKED FACE] even include HIM, sometimes!!! OY, VEY!!!

Seriously, it’s good for a laugh. Just listen from the beginning.


Wolf’s Bottom Line

The fact is, THEY are pushing an UNREALITY about coronaviruses in general, and COVID-19 in particular.

Masks are not the real issue. They are a PROXY.

The real fight is MANDATORY RISKY AND INFERIOR VACCINATION for common diseases that are better treated and prevented through natural immunity gained early in life.

THIS MEME.

W

“Why is isolation and vaccination of the young a good idea, when immunity to the real disease is almost without a doubt stronger and safer?”

“If COVID-19 is as much like known coronaviruses as it appears, and we are observing crossover immunity already, and crossover antibody reaction in diagnosis, and we know that coronavirus vaccines are all potentially risky with regard to immune enhancement, then why are we not protecting our children against both disease risks and vaccine / no-vaccine risks by letting them gain immunity NOW, when it is safest?”

What are YOUR questions for Bill Gates?

Dear KMAG: 20200612 Open Topic / Sterilization Vaccines / GuginoGate Teaser

This FEARLESS FRIDAY open thread is OPENVERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA / KAG! / KMAG world (KMAG being a bit of both MAGA and KAG!).



You can say what you want, comment on what other people said, and so on.

Free Speech is practiced here. ENJOY IT. Use it or lose it.

Keep it SOMEWHAT civil. They tried to FORCE fake Orwellian civility on us. In response, we CHOOSE true civility to defend our precious FREEDOM from THEM.

Our rules began with the civility of the Old Treehouse, later to become the Wolverinian Empire, and one might say that we have RESTORED THE OLD REPUBLIC – the early high-interaction model of the Treehouse – except of course that Q discussion is not only allowed but encouraged, and speech is considerably freer in other ways. Please feel free to argue and disagree with the board owner, as nicely as possible.

Please also consider the Important Guidelines, outlined here in the OLD January 1st , 2019 open thread. Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven.


SPEAK THE FIVE WORDS BOLDLY TO OUR PRESIDENT!

I AM PRAYING FOR YOU!


AND WHAT TIME IS IT?

TIME TO….

DRAIN THE SWAMP

Our movement

Is about replacing

A failed

And CORRUPT

Political establishment

With a new government controlled

By you, the American People.

Candidate Donald J. Trump

Also remember Wheatie’s Rules:

  1. No food fights.
  2. No running with scissors.
  3. If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.

This open thread has TWO additional purposes.

FIRST, it is going to be a TEASER for an article on “GuginoGate” – the latter being the FAKE NEWS SCANDAL underlying Trump’s tweet which is cited above.

Let’s look at that more closely…..

Yeah, let’s watch how he holds position on that last swipe, even after the cop shoves him away – WHICH I CONTEND WAS THE DESIRED RESPONSE BY THE POLICE TO SET UP WHAT FOLLOWS!!!!!…..

YUP – the DEFINITIVE ARTICLE on GUGINOGATE is coming!


But now I would like to REMIND everybody about one possible reason WHY Adam Schiff – serial liar and hoaxer – is so utterly HUNG UP on a really stupid idea that might be called “VACCINES CAN DO NO WRONG” – an utterly untenable scientific position, despite all the GOOD that smart, honest, proven and well-tested vaccines – like drugs – have to offer.

Adam Schiff – very wrongly – believes that any position other than “vaccines can do no wrong” is “misinformation“.

HORSEFEATHERS!!!

One of the PROOFS that vaccines can indeed “do harm” is the fact that vaccine candidates are FAILED all the time for such harm.

ANOTHER such proof is that THIS HARM is exactly the principle on which STERILITY VACCINES are based.

Sterility vaccines (or sterilization vaccines – take your pick) are DESIGNED to cause very specific harm that will render people STERILE without otherwise harming them.

It is important to know that significant progress has been made on these things.

First, go HERE to listen to a whistleblower’s report on that progress:

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/IalsQvC0XIdl/

Take it with a few grains of salt, but it still sounds both tenable and authentic to me.

NOW – it BOTHERS people – and I’m one of them – that SCIENCE has been doing a lot of lying lately, and has really earned the name FAKE SCIENCE. It’s not like we can trust everybody in science.

So – some people think the reason nobody is TALKING about sterilization vaccines, but great progress is being made on them, is that EUGENICISTS – like HITLER – are rearing their ugly heads again, and that THEY are the ones pushing SECRET RESEARCH on sterility vaccines.

I mean – let’s face it. Hitler would have MUCH preferred a sterilization vaccine to Zyklon B as a means to “solve the Jewish problem”.

SO, go HERE for Natural News to offer THEIR theory on where this is going.

RACIST EUGENICS.

SHOCKING podcast: The evil plot (by Big Pharma) to use COVID-19 vaccines to mass murder blacks

Depopulation globalist Melinda Gates already pushing experimental COVID-19 vaccines on “people of color” as the target group to vaccinate first

NOW – I don’t know if Mike is right about the eugenicists plotting to kill blacks, but Margaret Sanger and the Eugenics movement did indeed want to reduce the population of black people – that is very well documented.

And a eugenicist pretty much started World War II, if I recall.

And eugenicists are probably still around, although I think they keep a pretty low profile. But they certainly seem plausible. Enough that people believe science fiction involving such things is “highly likely to happen”.

But killing blacks?

Frankly, if CHINA were driving “sterilization wars”, I would think WHITES would be their primary target, but whatever.

Mike Adams’ view of COVID-19 actually sounds very well-informed to me. Not a lot of speculation there. That’s good. But the bottom line is that the real issue isn’t whether Mike Adams is credible. The real issue is that mainstream science and medicine, after all the literally murderous hate and trickery dropped on hydroxychloroquine from their ranks, are NOT CREDIBLE.

And we have to fix that.


W

PS – one more important video from Mike Adams.

BOMBSHELL: Leaked secret meeting reveals editor of The Lancet describing Big Pharma as “criminal”

Snopes Racing to Help Adam Schiff on Pedo Rumors

Just sayin’.

Here is its, more fully. If you go there now, you can probably still see it.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wd40-ad/

When is reporting on leftist DEFENSE a form of wrap-up smear? Well, probably when something is so damaging to the left, they actually have to defend on it. Whatever.

For the record, Schiff is married and his wife is “not unattractive”. She’s named Eve, and supposedly they get a lot of jokes about the “Adam and Eve” thing.

LINK: https://wagcenter.com/politics-wags/eve-schiff-5-facts-adam-schiffs-wife/

Also, for the record, it’s a bit of karma that the left’s cynical pushing of the right’s REAL rumors of REAL Democrat pedophilia (you know – the tacky, sordid, normal, kind, like HERE) “over the edge” into “crazy, unbelievable, pizzagate” territory should now come back to bite Schiff – if these rumors are NOT true, but whatever.

TIME WOUNDS ALL HEELS.

Seriously – THE NEWS is THE NEWS now. So as SNOPES accidentally TWISTS THE KNIFE on Adam Schiff, WE REPORT and YOU DECIDE.

Personally, I think it’s incredibly stupid for them to aggressively defend on this unless Schiff is guilty. But then when it comes to stupid AND evil, the left excels, trying to hide the LATTER under the FORMER so often, we simply expect it.

For the record, I believe that something is up with Schiff, but I have no idea what it ACTUALLY is. Could be more along the lines of corruption involving China and the Long Beach port. I do suspect that he likes money and power more than little boys, but you never know.


How did I stumble onto this?

Pat Frederick posted an excellent meme this morning, here: https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/11/24/dear-kmag-20191124-open-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-320409

credit: https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/saturday-funnies-ii

Way too funny. Would have gotten in trouble back in 1964, unless it was in PLAYBOY, and even then – probably trouble.

pgroup spotted it:

Just for the record, the WD 40 ad is a great fake. Notice the ” -” missing from the name. The product we all know and love is named WD-40.

pgroup, https://wqth.wordpress.com/2019/11/24/dear-kmag-20191124-open-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-320440

You can actually go to WD-40’s site, and they debunk a lot of myths, but NOT this ad in particular, that I can find. Maybe a more diligent search would find this particular ad. Seems like a weaponized omission to me – make people search their site more deeply. AH, NUMBERS.

LINK: https://www.wd40.com/myths-legends-fun-facts/

But anyway, when I “googled” using NOT GOOGLE, the SNOPES entry was already showing not merely the Schiff defense right through in the text, but even the ANTI-TRUMP.

If you look at the TOP ITEM (from Snopes), you can see the ANTI-TRUMP, and PRO-CHICOM stuff just leaking right through:

Nov 12, 2014 Is a 1964 WD-40 Ad Full of Sexual Innuendo? … Hundreds of fake account admins and 1,929 Facebook advertising violations only begin to tell the story of the Epoch Times-linked, pro-Trump empire …

search result: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wd+40+ad+fake&ia=web

This had the effect of reminding me of how, during the Trump campaign – particularly the PRIMARIES, there was an INCREDIBLE amount of MALICIOUS ADS targeting Donald Trump on INCESTUOUS PEDOPHILIA. Yes. NASTY. Pictures of Businessman Trump with his daughter Ivanka, insinuating very ugly stuff.

Remember those ads? They were too cringey to even take screenshots, although I wish I had. I was not as versed in the art of DISARMING psychological malware to STUDY THE BOMB back then.

Kinda like THIS, only in salacious ad form. I think they led to a lot of sites like these:

  • https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/donald-and-ivanka-trump-moments-that-totally-weird-us-out.html/
  • https://www.metro.us/president-trump/donald-and-ivanka-trump-awkward-photos
  • https://www.therichest.com/shocking/15-photos-ivanka-trump-doesnt-want-the-world-to-see/
  • https://www.cheatsheet.com/health-fitness/disturbing-things-never-knew-ivankas-relationship-donald-trump.html/

They were EVERYWHERE, and a lot of them went past ad blockers and privacy software, because they were FORCED onto conservative websites and blogs by Soviet CIA front companies that specialize in nasty politics by malicious ads.

Yeah.

SO…..

Is Adam Schiff a pedophile? And is he still beating his lovely wife?

DON’T ASK ME. ASK SNOPES.

W

Wolf's Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox

Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and ANTI-VAX at the same time.

I mean, what’s the use of FREE SPEECH if we can’t use it to troll EVERYBODY – including PENCILNECK?

Whoops – WRONG PENCILNECK. Let’s try that again….

THERE we go. That’s “better”!

Schiffty don’t like what he calls “misinformation” about vaccines. Well, consider this an OPINION piece, kinda like a RESTAURANT REVIEW. You can’t “misinform” in an artistic review of “so bad they’re good” side effects. Particularly when the flavorful review is comin’ from a connoisseur of dark beers, overpowering “old man” colognes, shockingly compliment-getting retrograde fashions, and KICK-ASS IMMUNE RESPONSE.

Not to mention wife-appalling HAWAIIAN SHIRTS.

Yeah, think of this as a CRITICAL REVIEW of the Italian medical opera Vaccino Zoster Ricombinante Contro il Lupo. Which as you will see is not exactly Springtime for Shingles, but it gets the job done and has the POSERS and LIGHTWEIGHTS among the “appassionato di anticorpi” running for the DOORS.

“Immunity? You want IMMUNITY? You can’t HANDLE THE IMMUNITY!”

Yeah. And while that FAT LADY named Zoster Booster ain’t sung yet, the VIRAL TABLOID NEWS is running for the phones with the STORY OF THE CENTURY!

STAND BACK.

THIS TRAIN don’t carry no PENCIL.

I mean NONE.


Now,

you have to understand that I actually LIKE getting vaccinated.

I was in school when the POLIO vaccine came out, and mothers BEGGED to come to school to MAKE SURE their children got the vaccine. MOMS talked about polio all the time. And so did kids. We asked LOTS of questions:

  • Why do those weird canes look like that?
  • Why do they call it the March of Dimes?
  • Can you still breathe in a wheelchair if you get polio?
  • How bad is the iron lung?
  • Was the president who had polio ever in the iron lung?
  • Why doesn’t the vaccine help people who already got polio?

The first time I got vaccinated, I cried, like most of the kids. The second time, however, the nurse taught us that if we laughed before she stuck the needle in, it wouldn’t hurt enough to make us cry – and she was RIGHT. And while this wasn’t the FIRST psy-op taught to me, it would always remain one of the best and most useful.

We knew we had to get the vaccine. Nobody wanted to end up like the “cripples” – or “the handicapped” as one said in more polite company. They were everywhere. You could not go downtown – even in our small town – and not see them.

Some were from The War, or maybe Korea, but by the time they cured polio, there were more people disabled from polio – or at least it seemed that way.

My babysitter – or “sitter” “for short” – was born in the 1800s. She was old, but tough as leather, and sharp as a tack. Nowadays, she would be considered “remarkably spry”, but there were many tough old birds like her, back then. She could recite hundreds of Bible verses perfectly. She hadn’t just SEEN wagon wheels by the sides of barns like we did – she RODE in wagons – covered and uncovered – as her main mode of transportation – long after the first cars and trucks appeared. She had perfect memories of two Testaments, two World Wars, and every kid she ever “sat”.

Most of all, she had experienced almost every major communicable disease EXCEPT polio. She could tell you ALL ABOUT THEM. Everything you wanted to know. She may have been a nurse when she was younger – I don’t remember. She did indeed live a rather extraordinary life.

Her BIGGIE was SMALLPOX – and she had the scars to prove it. While not all smallpox scars look the same, hers appeared as big, roughly circular, dark brown spots on her arms, legs, hands, face, and neck. She had some on her body, too, that she swore were there, but never showed us.

Compared to many people with more “pock-like” smallpox scars, hers were not bad at all – really more like big moles or nevi, though not quite beauty spots, so she never saw fit to have them removed, even though such things had become possible by the 1960s.

She was PROUD of her scars, and GRATEFUL that God saw fit for her to live.

With such things not only known to all of us, but topics of casual discussion, the idea of not getting vaccinated was regarded not as some kind of option, but rather as a misfortune. As in, “Did you hear? Eleanor CAN’T get the vaccine – she’s allergic to it.” “Oh, no. I’m so sorry for her. Are they sure? Can’t they they come up with a different kind of vaccine for people like her?”

All of us got the smallpox vaccine. The smallpox vaccine would typically produce a big welt on your shoulder, which would then heal to a big scab and fall off, leaving a very typical SCAR. The vaccine scar was not nearly as bad as a smallpox scar. All the women and girls had the vaccination scar, except my sitter, who didn’t need it. Sometimes you had to look a bit to find the vaccination mark on a girl’s shoulder, but it was always there.

Here is a good link to learn more about smallpox and its cure by vaccination, as taught in the context of some Fake Entertainment television show about time travel.

LINK: https://www.outlanderanatomy.com/smallpox-and-the-devils-mark/

And HERE is where we are introduced to the ideas behind Retrosynthetic DINOPOX.


THE IDEA OF AVOIDING SMALLPOX

by INOCULATION – basically “special, controlled, intentional infection” – using the smallpox virus ITSELF is called “variolation”. Although people didn’t know that it was a VIRUS, they knew that certain types of exposure to smallpox were “less deadly” than others. In fact, the rather horrifying idea of “sniffing powdered smallpox scabs” or “scratching fluids from a smallpox infection into the skin” reduced the mortality from upwards of 30% (the exact figure depends on who one asks, and at what time in history one is talking about) to only 2%. This was definitely practiced in China in the 10th and 16th centuries, and may have been practiced about 2000 years earlier in India.

The idea is that you will definitely get it, but it will be mild and you almost always won’t die, knock on wood.

Controlled exposure to the deadly contagion, so that one might live.

The next powerful advance, however, was not variolation but vaccination – so named because it used the much less dangerous COWPOX to give immunity to both cowpox and smallpox.

Finally, nowadays, when vaccination for smallpox is done, it uses not cowpox but the related vaccinia virus, which again gives immunity to both cowpox and smallpox as well.

So now let’s talk about SHINGLES and the SHINGLES VACCINE.

Shingles is basically what chickenpox looks like when it COMES BACK FROM DORMANCY later in life. And chickenpox is a bit LIKE smallpox, but it is really a different beast, which is not protected against by the smallpox vaccination. It’s a WHOLE ‘NUTHER POX – and MUCH less serious.

The chickepox vaccine was a replacement for what WE had as children – CHICKENPOX PARTIES – in which all the moms would make sure their kids GOT CHICKENPOX at a “good age”, when the disease was mild, the child old enough to understand English, and the outcome assured – a LIFELONG immunity against chickenpox. Not only that – the “recurrence disease” of “shingles” – which does NOT present AT ALL like chickenpox – was not common for those who actually HAD chickenpox, and not the vaccine.

Shingles is NOT a fun disease. I’ve had it once, and it tried to come back at least once. The treatment was the same in all cases – ANTIVIRAL drugs to lessen the severity of the disease and then beat it back – something that actually works rather nicely.

The first time I had shingles, in my early 50s, it struck one of the upper quadrants of my head. I thought that I would be permanently disabled. I could not even think during the periodic bouts of debilitating head pain – which was accompanied by a kind of overall sensory nervous dysfunction – something a bit like electrical shock. I literally began retirement preparations, knowing that I would be unable to function in an office environment any longer.

I was very lucky that the antiviral drugs kicked in quickly, lessening the severity enough to work from home, and eventually ending the bout with no permanent nerve damage. Had it not been for antiviral drugs, I would have had to go on disability, or retire early.

When shingles tried to come back, I knew the early warning signs – which for me are certain very characteristic lesions – and I got the drugs immediately. It was a smart move. The disease backed off right away. And although it never progressed that far again, I did get periodic “super-early signs”, which told me shingles was still lurking, waiting to strike again.

SO – you can imagine why I might want to consider the shingles vaccine, despite SO many reports of nasty side effects.

Shingles SUCKS for Wolf. A mildly sucky vaccine is MY COWPOX.

Only – it’s not. There IS no cowpox for shingles.

However, the NEW shingles vaccine – a very high-tech combination of FAKE VIRUS (recombinant surface glycoproteins of the Herpes Zoster virus, expressed in cell cultures) and IMMUNE RESPONSE PROVOCATEURS (meaning adjuvants) – is just as good, if not better.

A good description of the vaccine itself is here:

https://www.rxlist.com/shingrix-drug.htm#description

A good description from a pharmacist’s viewpoint is here:

Like COWPOX, which offers lifetime immunity to SMALLPOX, but through a very mild ACTUAL disease exposure – DINOPOX is gonna make you a bit ill. HOWEVER, in my opinion, it’s a whole lot better than real shingles, and well worth the problems.

Note that dinosaurs can be bigger than cows and are theoretically related to chickens, which however have nothing to do with chickenpox. How the name “chickenpox” was attached to chickenpox is not entirely clear. So while Dinos being Retro to Chickens is TRUE but IRRELEVANT, the SYNTHETIC nature of the vaccine is both true AND relevant.

The surface glycoprotein – obtained through recombinant DNA technology – says “this is what to attack”. The TWO adjuvants – including a new and powerful tree bark substance, say “respond to this stuff DRAMATICALLY”.

What is VERY interesting, is that the symptoms of this “fake disease” caused by the “fake virus”, which gives one much better immunity than even SHINGLES ITSELF (think about that), are actually both a bit like chickenpox, and a bit like shingles, only MUCH, MUCH milder than either – IN MY CASE.

I am only talking about MY CASE. More on that later.

I experienced at first a dull, mild pain, then very minor swelling, and then creeping surface redness at the injection site, in my upper arm. The redness grew within a couple of days to about 4 inches in diameter. The redness – which was HOT TO THE TOUCH – was still visible, but slowly dissipating, after the better part of a week.

The injection area – my upper arm – looked and felt, quite frankly, like I had been hit with a line drive baseball – but without any initial pain or later bruising. There was no sharp pain like a bee or wasp sting, but there was a very persistent dull pain, much like that from blunt force trauma. It was somewhat itchy, but not unbearably. The redness resembled – well – chickenpox. It was kind of bright and lobster-like, and NOT terribly rash-like. People might call it a rash, but it was not like an allergic surface rash, which thypically includes both edema and inflammation.

I also got a couple of ACTUAL CHICKEN POX – one near the injection site, and one on a random place on my belly. The redness matched the injection site, and the pustules matched my memory of chickenpox.

The most interesting symptoms, however, were those that resembled my own prior case of SHINGLES. These included both a kind of general, mild, “electric shock” sensation, over my whole upper body and head, and a stronger, cranial upper-quadrant, “electric” neuralgia in the exact area where I had debilitating pain during my first case of shingles.

However – and this is important – I did NOT have the pain associated with shingles itself.

The characteristic lesions of my shingles attacks were also NOT present.

Overall, I think this is quite possibly the STRONGEST vaccination I have ever received. The immune response is clearly BIGGER than anything I have yet experienced.


SO……

knowing what I know now, would I recommend this shot?

I would say, for anybody in my shoes – one who has NOT had significant reactions to vaccines before, but who HAS had nasty experiences with shingles – that it is a BETTER option to take this new Shingrix vaccine, than to endure the far greater risks of shingles. That is just my opinion, but it IS my opinion.

Others need to weigh the risks without any recommendation on my part.

Use what you know. Think about it. Make an informed decision.

Here are some links.

Pay SPECIAL ATTENTION to the COMMENTS on the last one, where people who had negative side effects dumped a LOT of anecdotal information. This is NOT useful statistically, but it is EXTREMELY USEFUL to know the DOWNSIDE RISKS. These bad cases will PROBABLY NOT happen to you, but they COULD. This information is VERY USEFUL in – say – planning that trip with the non-refundable tickets.

You know what I’m sayin’? Yeah. You know what I’m sayin’.


https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/shingles-recombinant.html

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/shingles/index.html

https://www.cdc.gov/shingles/vaccination.html

https://www.cdc.gov/shingles/downloads/shingles-factsheet-adults.pdf

https://www.cdc.gov/shingles/downloads/shingles-factsheet-hcp.pdf

https://www.consumerreports.org/shingles-vaccine/new-shingles-vaccine-shingrix-what-you-should-know/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chickenpox

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2018/09/new-supercharged-shingles-vaccine-has-serious-problems/

SO…..

My final verdict – FOUR out of FIVE STARS.

Yeah, Dinopox is all that, but I’m still waiting for something with a bag of chips.

W

PS – So what is YOUR opinion about the new shingles vaccine, or related topics?