DEAR KAG: 20220121 – The Pub is OPEN / The Anti-Saline Theory and The Toxic Batch Problem

The Pub is OPEN!

Tonight is a special night. We invite ALL SCIENTISTS to come down to the bar for TWO HOURS, and listen to one scientist appeal to our LOGIC and our COMMON SENSE on the TOXIC BATCH PROBLEM.

ALL WHO WISH are invited to sit down, drink in hand, and watch – but it is especially important that ALL SCIENTISTS see this.

It is my contention that if ALL scientists in the world – on this planet – watch this video that I will show you, then the entire WORLD will be QUICKLY AWAKENED to the reality of some kind of systematic problem with the current COVID vaccines – some kind of problem which is evidenced by toxicity showing up with certain batches.

But more about that later.

Right now, come into the bar and find a comfy spot.

While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.

Though we are not especially good at mixing tasty drinks, we can stir some occasional thoughts into a compelling report, argument, recollection, or proposition.

And with that barest promise, we begin.


On the Jukebox

The rare live version of a song rarely found on any bar jukebox – enjoy!

Psalm 118:19-24

19Open to me the gates of righteousness, that I may enter and give thanks to the LORD.

20This is the gate of the LORD; the righteous shall enter through it.

21I will give You thanks, for You have answered me, and You have become my salvation.

22The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.

23This is from the LORD, and it is marvelous in our eyes.

24This is the day that the LORD has made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.


Christmas Spirit

We are going to stretch out Christmas longer than your neighbor who never takes down their Christmas lights.

Enjoy this reminder of how special it was to have the Trumps in the White House.

Will they be back?

STAY TUNED!!!

And now, the rules of the pub.


HOUSE RULES

God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.

Now, back to business.


AMEN!

(#FJB = Free the January Brothers)


Current Art On The Wall

We opened this week’s shipment, and there was a note on top of the contents that said:

“DANGER: STEAMPUNK”

Looks like a real Pandora’s box to me!

Sure enough, the very next thing we found was MONDAY’S LEFTOVERS.

Mmmmmmmmm. Remember – if the can isn’t actually bulging, you can ignore the date!

Click it! The music seems useful for viewing the remainder of the art!

MOAR COWBELL GEARS!!!

Yeah, I’m enjoying this timeframe-loosening absinthe of sorts.

Indeed, absinthe per se seems to be a meme in steampunk.

Look for GREENPUNK as a subgenre of STEAMPUNK.

OK – one more image and then back to reality.

LOL. Nope. That’s not it.

Let’s try another.

AYE-YI-YI. That’s not it, either. I get the sentiment, but I tend to think the devil’s in certain details of the genre, and – as always in the art world – one must proceed with caution.

Although I do have a story about a fantastic dream you may have heard. In some ways, it was the opposite of steampunk, but it had a certain similar quality of alternate reality about it.

Let’s try one more.

Hey – that’s not steampunk! That’s REALPUNK.

I’ll let Steve tell us all about it.

In the meanwhile, we take leave of the infinitude of artistic imagination, and find ourselves back at the concrete.

Or so one might think!


And now our feature presentation

The Anti-Saline Theory and The Toxic Batch Problem – Did Somebody Actually Contaminate Lots of the Vaccines?


I never really thought that I might be defending Big Pharma – in whole or in part – at this point in the multiple scandals of the COVID-19 Plannedemic.

Maybe “defending” isn’t the right word. Maybe “presenting a potentially somewhat exonerating theory” IS the right phrase.

In fact, I don’t even know WHO I’m exonerating, or or that matter, WHO I’m accusing. Likewise, I’m not even sure who the TARGETS of the perpetrators in this “theory” actually are.

However, this is not a “conspiracy theory” – something which is generally certain of perpetrators, victims, and motives.

This is a CRIMINAL THEORY. This is a theory which allows us to begin to examine an apparent crime, in order to determine perpetrators, victims, and motives. It’s a theory which may even be wrong.

I ask all of you to briefly set aside prejudices, which is often necessary to do when evidence needs to be viewed as potential exoneration. Feel free to bring your prejudices and prior theories back AFTER you have looked at these possibilities, because you will need to compare theories, and your current favorites need to CONTEND with what I’m proposing here.

Thus, we begin.


The Saline Theory

The SALINE THEORY – which many regard as a criminal theory, and which others regard as a “conspiracy theory”, contends that the reason some people have either NO REACTION or ALMOST NO REACTION to the “clot shot” – meaning all the standard Western COVID-19 vaccines – is that those people are being given medical saline solution instead of actual coronavirus vaccines.

The proposed motives for this, generally speaking, are either to spare particular individuals from the problems of the vaccines, OR to statistically reduce the numbers of people being KILLED or INJURED by the vaccines to acceptable levels.

Now, in full disclosure, I have been generally, if quietly, rather critical of the saline theory, despite the fact that I am very skeptical of Big Pharma in general, and even more skeptical of Pfizer and Moderna.

Why am I skeptical of the theory? Basically, because it doesn’t really change most vaccines. In a sentence, vaccines are DESIGNED to approximate saline.

In the history of vaccines, the GOAL has always been to literally approach the state of “injecting people with saline” – meaning not much of anything is given, and nothing bad happens.

Thus, an ideal vaccine – and in practice most good vaccines – basically do nothing except grant immunity, which until recently was always expected to be inferior to “natural” disease-conferred immunity.

Let me point out AS AN ASIDE right here that the industry lost megatons of credibility by letting the media trot out nonsense about vaccine immunity being better than disease-conferred immunity, allegedly negating centuries of medical knowledge. Foolish to abandon the truth on that one. Clearly the result of Big Pharma now having the upper hand against Big Med, thanks to Big Finance, and the willingness of Big Media to tell any lie. But I digress.

The point is simple. We EXPECT normal, good vaccines to have very few adverse events – so rare that we rarely hear about them – and that people basically ARE getting saline.

In other words, people generally can’t tell the difference between a good vaccine, a “bad because too weak” vaccine, and saline.

THAT’S THE POINT – that the REALITY of rare adverse events is expected to MATCH our experience of almost never hearing about or experiencing first, second, or third-hand, that somebody had a problem with a vaccine.

I myself went through life NEVER connecting a vaccine to any personal injury – that is, until I got over 30 years of flu shots, religiously, but then switched to my dominant shoulder for no particular reason, and experienced subsequent NOTICEABLE inflammatory issues which were very likely connected to the vaccine. All that being said, I was much older at that point, and older people ARE more likely to experience inflammation of joints as part of getting old. Indeed, this didn’t stop me from getting the flu shot for a number of more years – KNOWING that the vaccine might be responsible.

SO – bottom line – I’m not at all skeptical of vaccine injury, from sore arms up to death.

But I remain skeptical of the saline theory – for the stated reasons.

I never throw anything OUT completely – but I have been quite skeptical that there might be ANY kind of conspiracy – even a very realistic one – to replace weak “do-nothing” vaccines that the industry has spent DECADES making, and is quite good at making, with saline that does almost the same thing.

And INDEED – bear the opposite in mind. Bad things happen to people who get placebos, “because math”. And more than that, bad things happen to people who get saline, “because injection”. It’s extremely rare, but it DOES happen. This is an acknowledged truth of Anthony Fauci’s Holy of Holies, the placebo-controlled double-blind study. That’s why researchers factor out the difference which comes simply from “doing the test”.

But the fact is simple. Saline is generally pretty damn safe to inject, because it does nothing. A good vaccine, likewise, does nothing but provide some degree of immunity – hopefully lifelong, but with a number of years generally being acceptable, depending on the vaccine.

SO – if you tell me somebody got saline – I will tell you that they got a “good vaccine”, and we’re left with only some very difficult science to tell which of us is right.

However, all of that has a problem.

A HUGE problem.

The problem is summed up by the fact that almost everybody in the English-speaking world recognizes the term “clot shot” as a grim, joking nickname for the COVID-19 vaccines.

That didn’t happen by accident. Admittedly, it’s an injection for preventing or pre-treating a clotting disease by generating immunity TO a clotting protein WITH that same clotting protein, or something very similar to it. BUT STILL…..

In practice, this is NOT a harmless vaccine. No amount of propaganda changes that.


The Anti-Saline Theory

So what is the ANTI-SALINE THEORY?

The anti-saline theory, based on something called the toxic batch problem, is roughly a mirror image of the saline theory. It thus contends that some of the coronavirus vaccines were the opposite of non-toxic saline which could NOT harm people, and were, in fact, loaded with something nasty which caused illness and death.

Possible motives are likewise mirror images of the saline theory – to either harm certain people, or to INCREASE the number of injuries and deaths from the vaccines.

NOW – let me be clear. In the absence of the “potential evidence” of the toxic batch problem, I would be every bit as skeptical of the anti-saline theory as I am of the saline theory.

Even for a bad, risky, side-effect-prone vaccine, blaming the still-generally-infrequent side-effects on anything BUT the vaccine itself would seem foolhardy. We have MANY “more risky” vaccines for nasty tropical diseases, from yellow fever up to Ebola, which we generally ONLY give to people at high risk of actually getting the disease, because the vaccines may be a LESSER RISK than the disease, but they are an INCREASED RISK over most vaccines.

We normally don’t need to postulate that the cause of that higher risk is adulteration due to a new cause or perpetrator, when we have the vaccine itself and the vaccine makers, presumably fighting the risk but possibly not succeeding as well as we would like, as our primary suspects.

So how does the toxic batch problem change all that?


The Toxic Batch Problem

First, a reflection. A bit of a warning. Something to prepare you.


At the various stages where one understands pieces of this problem, the revelations really cannot be “unseen”. And yet, the fact that this problem WAS unseen by SO many for SO long, raises questions about whether or not we are just now seeing the edges of something which has been with us for far longer than we realized.

I know that sounds a bit fantastic, as well as euphemistic and even a bit “code”, but now you understand why so many people who have gained deep knowledge of problems with the COVID vaccines, have gone through various emotionally jarring moments of realization.

Something is NOT RIGHT, and yet there seems to be INTENTION behind the condition.

SO – if you get HIT by this sort of realization as we are going along, just know that you are not alone.

OK, back to work. Ah, yes. The toxic batch problem.


I can sum it up as this.

Normally, one expects that a consistently produced pharmaceutical has a VERY wide range of reactions in those to whom it is given, BUT that this statistical range of responses (you can imagine a bar graph, a pie chart, a curve, or a whole bunch of all of them) will stay roughly the same from BATCH TO BATCH.

Stated simply, we expect the variation BETWEEN sets of variations to be SMALL, CLOSE, PREDICTABLE, and REPRODUCIBLE.

This is simply the “law of large numbers”. You flip a thousand pennies. I flip a thousand pennies. It’s very unlikely that we’ll get exactly the same numbers, but BOTH OF US will be close to 500 heads and 500 tails. Any deviation from this will be a nice bell curve, perfectly explainable by statistics.

Try any “batch” of pennies – it will be close to 50:50 heads-to-tails because of the consistency of pennies.

The toxic batch problem is that adverse events for the COVID-19 vaccine batches violate this – and in a HUGE WAY.

A small fraction of the batches (about 5%) are STRIKINGLY TOXIC relative to all the other batches.

The differences are too big, the harmless group is too large, the nasty group is too small, and there are additional patterns that are not random and should not be there.

Yes, there will be variation in the exact numbers of deaths and injuries from batch to batch, “because statistics“, but that variation should be small, natural, centered, and understandable mostly in terms of mathematics. If there IS a big difference in the numbers between the batches, then there has to be some kind of systematic difference – most likely either in the contents of the batches, or in the administration of the batches.

Let’s look at the latter first.

As an example of an administration difference, if you give one batch to kids, and another to seniors, you expect differences. However, if the batches are BIG, and they’re used in a lot of different places, and the groups of people those places serve are large and diverse, then the differences from administration will vanish.

And even if those differences DON’T vanish – in FACT, even if you INTENTIONALLY give one batch to kids and another to seniors, those differences cannot be as big as what was observed.

Another administration difference would be to use some batches ONLY for first injections, and others ONLY for second injections.

Again, we do expect differences there, but not nearly as big as what is observed.

IN FACT, the difference between the “good, nearly harmless batches” (doesn’t that sound like saline?) and the BAD batches is SO big, that it is NOT EXPLAINED by ANYTHING seen in the Moderna and Pfizer trials.

THIS is one of our first clues that something is actually wrong with the contents of those toxic batches.

Now – let’s look at the possibility of a difference in contents.

Could it be that the vaccines are “going bad” and turning into something more poisonous?

Yes, this is possible – BUT the fact of the matter is that when drugs degrade, they almost invariably become “less active”, not MORE active – and certainly never MORE active by orders of magnitude.

Rocks just don’t “roll uphill” by themselves.

In fact, there is a great argument you will see later, made about the COVID-19 vaccine data, as compared to the flu vaccine data, which points out that if you remove all the “bad batches” from the COVID-19 vaccine data, it looks almost exactly like the flu shot.

BASICALLY, SALINE.

Like a normal vaccine is supposed to look.

Now, hopefully, you not only understand why I called this the “anti-saline theory”, but you are also “seeing certain things that you cannot unsee”.

Because YES – something is definitely wrong with those batches.

Even if you don’t accept that the majority of batches are “harmless”, something is terribly wrong with the rest.


But before I get into talking about possible reasons as to WHY these “bad batches” are different, I want to thoroughly convince you that they ARE different and that it’s NOT NORMAL.

I want to give you a brief introduction to the toxic batch problem as seen by the people who found it, examined it, and first told the world.


A Pharma Exec & Researcher Examines the Data

We begin with a video of a man who appears to me to be very typical of the scientists that I knew during my career. He does not appear crazy, loony, mentally ill, psychopathic, or even irrational.

He seems, if anything, like somebody who has witnessed institutional madness descending upon their professional world. You know – like what happened to scientists in Russia in the early 1900s, and in Germany and Italy in the 1930s.

As I listened to this guy, he made scientific sense, just like any seminar speaker, invited lecturer, or even an interviewer for student job prospects from a drug company.

In fact, I believe that if most scientists listened to him, they would BELIEVE HIM.

There is something *apparently* wrong with certain specific batches of the COVID vaccines from three companies that were used globally AND specifically in America. And according to the speaker, a retired drug industry executive and research scientist, this difference cannot be random – it must be adulteration of some kind.

Just watch and see what you think.


LINK: https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Mike-Session-86-en:0


Now – let me summarize.

The most key and salient point is that vaccine side effects vary strongly by batch number – and in a way that the drug companies MUST understand to be REAL and PROBLEMATIC. The variation is NOT merely statistical from a quality-controlled product. It is systematic – meaning it has a CAUSE other than randomness. It is not necessarily intentional (IMO), but it is an OBVIOUS problem.

There is also some argument over how batch toxicity varies across time and batch number – I will leave THAT for the next videos.

The point which the speaker, Dr. Yeadon, made which struck me hardest, was the simple but powerful idea that the individual responses of recipients to a vaccine batch can vary wildly, BUT that the statistical array of responses will NOT vary significantly between batches – that it CANNOT vary – UNLESS there is some REAL, SIGNIFICANT, CONTENT DIFFERENCE between the batches.

The alternative, in my opinion, would be that the batch differences are administration-based – e.g., that batches primarily used for SECOND administrations would have much higher adverse events.

I’m not wed to that thought – but it is an alternative that is every bit as troubling as content differences, and negates the entire strategy of “boosterism”. I also tend to doubt it, both because it does not explain the magnitude of the difference, and is also statistically very unlikely. Content differences just seem more likely to me.


The People Who Found The Toxic Batch Problem

NEXT, I want to deepen the explanation of what Dr. Yeadon was describing. Yeadon provides drug industry credibility to the idea that batch differences are real and almost certainly content-based. They don’t look right to somebody with industry experience.

But NOW we need to explore possible explanations for those differences, based on a closer look at the differences themselves.

SO – next, I want to show you some additional videos and web pages that drill down into the “toxic batch problem”.

We’ll start with the “secondary reporting” and then get to the data itself.

In this video, Stu Peters and Dr. Jane Ruby, who I criticize routinely when they edge toward clickbait, are doing an AMAZING job of reporting on a group of investigators who studied the batch differences. This is excellent journalism. These two can only be as good as their material, but WOW – they have quality material here.


LINK: https://www.brighteon.com/9a45a7a0-e260-4a6c-a251-2b4c139dd211


Now, follow that up with an even deeper examination of the toxic batches.

Jump to 12:50 to continue the discussion. Jane Ruby ends at about 19:00. At 20:00 (to 32:12) it picks back up again with a member of the investigatory group, Team Enigma, who is a pharmaceutical industry bio-statistician. She adds a different perspective on how SMALL any group poisoning the vaccines might be.

This doesn’t require a grand conspiracy of many people. It might involve only a few dedicated and highly skilled saboteurs.


LINK: https://rumble.com/vs59wj-live-hackers-reveal-deadly-jab-lot-numbers-horrific-pfizer-teen-trial-data-.html

Now, let’s look at one of the original presentations of data by Team Enigma.


LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4HlIyBmOEJeY/

Points made in this video:

  • dosages of pharmaceuticals are normally highly controlled
  • consistency and purity are also normally highly controlled
  • COVID vaccines can be readily and correctly compared to flu vaccines
  • flu vaccines are consistent and low in adverse events
  • COVID vaccines are NOT consistent, and vary widely between harmless and highly toxic
  • toxic batches are too wide-spread – problems like refrigeration loss cannot be responsible

Now – here is an EXTREMELY compelling video, which shows in great detail the DIFFERENCE between the “harmless batches” and the “toxic batches”.

LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6xIYPZBkydsu/

Pay special attention to the following ideas:

  • most batches (roughly 80%) are almost completely harmless
  • the bad batches produce up to (and in MANY cases) a thousand times more adverse reactions
  • when viewed geographically in the United States, the bad batches affect every state in America

The latter point proves the generality of the effect – that local differences can’t account for the toxicity of the particular lots. If anything, the high distribution of the batches seems to be used to hide the toxicity.

Next, I want to return you to the PERSONAL REALITY of the toxic batch problem.


A Personal Case of a Bad Batch

It turns out that Dr. Robert Malone got one of the “bad batches” for his second vaccine, and almost died.

Just read here.

LINK: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/how-bad-is-my-batch

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/5Q9dx


A Good Review of the Toxic Batch Problem

Lastly, here is a very nice review of work on the toxic batch problem. Very nicely put together, with lots of graphs and key points as quotes. This is a real CONVINCER.

LINK: https://hillmd.substack.com/p/vaccine-batches-vary-in-toxicity

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/h0R8Y

Some of the videos in the review have been removed for some reason, but not this one.

This video is truly stunning. This video shows apparent patterns in the deployment of batches. While I am not fully in agreement that this is proven to be the work of the companies themselves, I think that there is overwhelming evidence of “bad batches” and some kind of pattern which looks like the results are being studied.


By the time you’ve gotten here, you very likely think that something is definitely wrong with certain batches.

Next, I want to begin thinking about HOW and WHY somebody might want to do such a thing. In the process, I’m going to “lean into” some current events and statements made by varous people.

This is where things get political, geopolitical, military, and more.


How and Why Would Anybody Poison the West’s Major COVID Vaccines?

This is where we begin to say to ourselves:

Did somebody actually poison various lots of these vaccines? WHO would do it? Who COULD do it? WHY? Why would ANYBODY do this? HOW did they pull it off? WHAT possible benefit could they get from it? WHERE did they do it?

I’m going to leave most of these questions TO YOU ALL.

I want YOU to tell ME.

Now, we have a list of “usual suspects”, but things get interesting when you consider additional motives, additional suspects, and additional opportunities.

MEANS, MOTIVE, and OPPORTUNITY are what turn “conspiracy theories” into CRIMINAL THEORIES.

So I’m going to give you some “kick-starters” to get you seeing some possibilities.

The first thing that got me thinking “HMMMMM……” about things, was when Team Enigma began seeing evidence of coordination between the drug companies, in the chronology of the toxic batches.

As somebody who has been involved with real conspiracies, the idea that drug companies coordinated their plotting to poison the vaccines does NOT sound realistic.

Real conspiracies need compartmentalization. They need as few as possible seeing the big picture.

Thus, it is MUCH more likely, IMO, that there is a SINGLE player who is involved with ALL of the vaccines – a SINGLE player – who would be able to pull off a systematic study of poisoning them.

One such player is the CCP.

BOTH the Pfizer vaccine AND the Moderna vaccine are utterly dependent upon components manufactured in CHINA. Indeed, the “lipid nanoparticle technology” of the mRNA vaccines is pretty much delivered by Chinese companies.

That is how Karen Kingston discovered that components of the “clot shot” vaccines were manufactured by a Chinese company called SINOPEG, which ALSO specializes in something called “PEGylated graphene oxide”, which is further known to temperature-stabilize mRNA vaccines.

I’m not necessarily saying that graphene oxide was used here, although it’s worth considering.


SIDEBAR: For background on graphene oxide (sometimes called graphene hydroxide – it’s the same thing, really), go HERE.

SIDEBAR: For background on the work by Karen Kingston, former Pfizer employee, who figured out the Chinese connection on the lipid nanoparticle components, go HERE.


Moderna executives are also deeply associated with these Chinese companies and their controlling organizations – see photo below. Note what this page (discovered by Karen Kingston) means – you have COVID-19 vaccines, graphene lipid nanotech IN those same vaccines, and pictures of Moderna executives mentioned on the same page.

If this is not a smoking gun, it’s a pretty damn good imitation, suitable for blackmail.

Thus, it sure seemed possible to ME, that if the CCP or PLA wanted to “intervene” in the vaccines, they have MEANS and OPPORTUNITY.

What about MOTIVE?

Well, Deplorable Patriot found something that got me thinking.

So – according to this theory, the US is being blackmailed by the Chinese government.

As soon as I saw this, I realized exactly HOW the ChiComs could have war-gamed this whole thing for some grand-master play.

  • CCP/PLA + Cabal makes Western pharma weak and dependent upon ChiCom manufacturing
  • CCP/PLA has total control of Chinese companies and products they ship
  • CCP/PLA has total control of information within Chinese borders (remember their “rules” which made many SMART companies LEAVE CHINA)
  • CCP/PLA begins manipulating people to make them RUN FROM TRUTH and into CHINESE CONTROL

To me, this makes CHINA a no-brainer suspect. It doesn’t matter WHO is POTUS – Biden or Trump – if the vaccines have problems in the West, CHINA wins.

  • China gets power over the American POTUS
  • China gets power over the American Deep State
  • China gets power over the global pharmaceutical industry

Basically, it’s a form of entrapment.

And remember – if China gets caught and wants to blamecast, they can say “it wasn’t us – it was this rogue company cheating” – and nobody can prove otherwise on anything within Chinese borders.


NOW – there could be other players. China is not the only player who would benefit by making the West stumble here.

WEF, for instance, strikes me as “guilty as sin”. If the vaccines were really safe, they could not stir up as much division as we’re seeing. To me, KlauSS SSchwab and the WEFFEN SS have to be a suspect.

Depopulationists are also an easy target.

Satanists as well. This is their thing.

“FOREIGN” could also be doing things independently of their pet globalists and depopulationists.

Russia, unfortunately, is also an easy suspect, thanks to their stupid antics with Skripal and other spies. If the Russians wanted to keep America WEAK, causing a mess with the vaccines to keep Americans divided would be one way to do it. However, I tend to think that they don’t have as much MEANS and OPPORTUNITY as China. But to be fair, we have to keep Russia on the list.

Similarly Ukraine – to which Democrat operative Alexandra Chalupa seems to have some kind of weird supreme loyalty – because it doesn’t have a perfectly clean history on poisonings, either.

Ukrainian opposition presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko, with his face disfigured by illness, during an interview with the Associated Press in Kiev, Ukraine, Thursday, Dec. 16, 2004. Yushchenko said Thursday that he is sure he was poisoned by the Ukrainian government, and for the first time pinpointed the time and place of his dioxin poisoning: a Sept. 5 lunch with the head of the Ukrainian security service and his deputy. (AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky)

And, of course, there is our own DEEP STATE, still led in truth by Barack Obama.

Obama seems really committed to a kind of Stalinist, utilitarian, “death panel” health agenda, where health-care shuffles off people to their graves to save money.

Obama’s famous academic and New York Times-featured “moral advisors” on healthcare have always been, and remain in my opinion, a litany of granny-snuffers. SO – if Obama’s “worst of the worst of the KGB faction in CIA” wanted to begin testing depopper stuff on us – well – they could be up to tricks.

But none of them has as much MMO as China.

All in all, CHINA looks like my main suspect.

They poisoned our dog treats forever, making it look like greedy little companies was the extent of the problem.

We just put up with it.

Maybe they got ideas from that.

WHAT DO YOU THINK, SUSPICIOUS CAT?


So who is your main suspect?

Or do you have a different explanation of the toxicity of the shots – and especially something that explains the weirdly binary toxicity / non-toxicity of the batches?

I’m interested in your thoughts!


Have a Great Weekend

And don’t forget to…..

ENJOY THE SHOW.

W

Dear KMAG: 20220110 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / The Ethical Skeptic’s Elevator Pitch / Corbevax – The “Good” Vaccine That Snuck* Past The Criminals

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

U.S. President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump arrive for the 96th annual National Christmas Tree Lighting ceremony near the White House in Washington, U.S., November 28, 2018. REUTERS/Jim Young – RC1E6EA87210

AND our beautiful REALFLOTUS.

Get your rest, Trumpy Bear! You’re going back to the White House!!!

I think this statement is one of the best political speeches ever! Thank you, Trumpismine, for alerting us to this gem!


Please Stand By For A Brief Interruption…..

*SNUCK – A Special Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day

Is it “snuck” or is it “sneaked”? DA WOOF was raised on “snuck”, more than likely because of his young hillbilly associates.

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary has a wonderful discussion of this point.

LINK: https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/snuck-or-sneaked-which-is-correct

Bottom Line:

TAKE YOUR PICK

FTA:

The original past tense of sneak was sneaked, following the pattern of other regular verbs. However, in the 19th century snuck started appearing, and is now the more common version for the past tense of “sneak.” Most irregular verbs become regular over time, but sneak has become irregular, and no other word like sneak (peek, creak, etc.) follows a similar pattern.

We shall return to our roots and use “snuck” as often as possible, but “sneaked” where it sounds better, like “sneaked a peek”.

We now return you to our regular programming.


The Business At Hand

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get through it, NO PROBLEM.


The Rules

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.

The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

I want to make TWO POINTS today.

POINT 1 – No Political Correctness (of Any Kind)

We shall endeavor to keep all forms of political correctness OUT of this place.

Even a hypothetical MAGA PC.

The idea that some things cannot be said “because MAGA” or “because Trump” is a non-starter. Don’t even.

THAT is a path back to BUSHISM and RINOism.

The utter banishment of PC is how we make sure that ALL “non-establishment voices” can be heard.

Political correctness always starts off with “we’re just asking you to be nice”, or, “we all believe this, don’t we?”, but it always ends up in censorship, because that is where it was ALWAYS HEADED.

You can use LOGIC, REASON, RELIGION, SCIENCE, and any other form of honest quarrel, even as simple as saying “I don’t like that”, but NOT political correctness.

PC is the most insidious infringement of free speech to ever exist.

And PC is not just a leftist thing.

A classic example from history is “You can’t criticize a sitting President during wartime.”

Where in the hell did THAT come from?

I would think that wartime is THE MOST IMPORTANT TIME for there to be criticism – even from people I absolutely can’t STAND (and I did like the Dixie Chicks, even when they were stupid as hell!)

Nope.

No idea, discussed honestly, truthfully, and with the agreed level of civility, is “beyond the pale”.

This site does not exist to protect certain ideas from examination. It exists to shine light into EVERY nook and cranny.

Thus, please don’t demand that certain topics or ideas be “off limits”, or declare that they are justifying of incivility.

Point 2 – Ignoring Those Who Disagree In Automatic Ways

People who disagree with your comments are simply part of this place, because of FREE SPEECH. You just have to put up with it. All viewpoints are subject to being countered in a civil fashion.

“Civil” does not necessarily mean that you will not be annoyed or frustrated by the reply or replies.

Feel free to offer to “agree to disagree”.

Now there are some people who don’t want to “agree to disagree”. They feel a kind of necessity to speak their mind – to state ALL disagreements, and to continue ad infinitum. Often this is religious, where the person believes that failure to disagree is a dereliction of moral responsibility.

This can get frustrating, if you feel that you HAVE TO RESPOND.

Because you DON’T HAVE TO RESPOND.

The best medicine for ad infinitum disagreements, even in moral duty, is to IGNORE THE REPLY. And I mean don’t respond in ANY way.

Do not demand that the other person “henceforth ignore what you say”, because that’s not part of free speech. YOU ignoring THEM is.

Trust me – when people see that you are not responding to somebody who “gets in the last word no matter what”, they are NOT thinking that this person “won the argument”. They think you have better things to do. AND YOU DO.

SO….. [ENGAGE BOILERPLATE…..]

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

Those who cannot deal with this easy requirement will be forced to jump the hoops of moderation, so that specific comments impugning other posters and violating the minimal rules can be sorted out and tossed in the trash.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

That includes the life skill of just ignoring certain other posters.

We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).

We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”


A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

You may also pray for our enemies, even Pantifa, who need a good prison ministry.


MUSICAL INTERLUDE

For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.

First – a little “commercial” music from a certain airline.

Well – one thing leads to another. A bit of island-hopping, and then back to Hawaii…..

OK – that’s enough of that. Give me some of that LUCINDA CHICK that Smiley turned me onto! Let’s try the same song LIVE.

Now just add some ELVIS COSTELLO, who shows up with everybody.

OK – let’s see who else we can hook up Elvis with…..

OK. Maybe a good transition.


Call To Battle

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Yup. MASS, GRAVITY, TIME and CONSEQUENCES THEREOF are most definitely a thing.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.


The Ethical Skeptic’s Elevator Pitch

You will recall LAST FRIDAY’S POST in which one of the topics was entitled:

ThEthSkep’s Big Fix of All Things Coof: CCP Hiding Chinese 2018 Release of SARS-CoV-2 Virus

This segment of the daily open covered a wonderful post (more like a “blog paper”) by The Ethical Skeptic, in which it is postulated (and to my satisfaction, demonstrated) that the Omicron variant is of a separate lineage from the Wuhan release and descendants thereof.

I had commented on The Ethical Skeptic’s post, that if he formulated an “elevator pitch” for his paper, I would trumpet it to the world.

WELL, HE DID!

Here is his “elevator pitch”, as well as the context.


WOO-HOO!!!

I got an “elevator pitch” from The Ethical Skeptic!!!

😍

The Ethical Skeptic(@theethicalskeptic)

Author

 Reply to  Wolf Moon

 2 days ago

Elevator pitch

“When one examines the complete 144-slot genetic profile of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, it becomes clear that its lineage is a full two years older than even the first Covid virus in Wuhan, China. Not only did this ancestor of Omicron cause an outbreak across the world in 2018 and 2019, that was mistaken as an 8-fold higher rate of flu across the Asia-Pacific-Africa for those years, but its genetics reveal a robust history of lab mouse serial passes and lab-edited alleles. This proving that its 2018 release as a less-deadly immunity-builder prophylactic virus, and the subsequent release of the more-deadly Wuhan variant two years later, both originated from a weapons-grade bio-lab in China.

China set up a red herring for the world to ‘discover’ at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its local seafood wet market, suggesting an unfortunate but understandable accident was being thinly concealed. Now, the problem for China is, that unlike all the other variants, Omicron stuck around for some reason, and is now spilling the beans on the whole sordid affair.”

TES 🙂


Now, let me repeat that in five pieces, with commentary in between.

But first, let me remind you, that this elevator pitch is NOT an abstract or a summary of the blog post. It is a small “explainer and convincer” that gives you the GIST of the proposition – enough to make you GET IT.

If you have just a few seconds to convince somebody that something needs attention, you need an “elevator pitch” – as in “I got on the elevator with the head of research, and finished my proposal right as she got off on her floor.”

Here we go!


When one examines the complete 144-slot genetic profile of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, it becomes clear that its lineage is a full two years older than even the first Covid virus in Wuhan, China.

In my opinion, it has been clear that EVERYBODY is surprised by the genetic divergence of Omicron from the original Wuhan strain, as well as all the other descendants thereof. How in the HECK did that happen?

Well, it gets worse. It turns out that Omicron or its close ancestors have been around since about the time we first started looking at SARS-CoV-2.

It is NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE that this virus is a product of mutation of Wuhan.

Something stinks.

Well, what TES has done, is to look closely at the genetics, and come up with a VERY plausible explanation of them, which ALSO explains many other interesting facts – particularly in the 2018-2019 timeframe.


Not only did this ancestor of Omicron cause an outbreak across the world in 2018 and 2019, that was mistaken as an 8-fold higher rate of flu across the Asia-Pacific-Africa for those years, but its genetics reveal a robust history of lab mouse serial passes and lab-edited alleles.

This matches up with many facts from 2018 and 2019, as well as my belief that China was actively engaged in some kind of shenanigans with the SARS outbreak of 2003.

China, in my opinion, has not only been LEARNING from secret and public accidental viral releases – it has been engineering many intentional releases for DECADES.

I think now is a good time to accept the following.

NOTHING that the CCP says should be believed or disbelieved. What they say is irrelevant, except as evidence of possible deception, criminality, and lies. Treat CCP or proxy statements as evidence from criminals – nothing more.

Example: https://www.theepochtimes.com/china-the-manipulation-of-data-and-the-biggest-lie-in-modern-history_4196857.html/

NOW – here is something interesting.

Here is a perfect example of Chinese scientific disinformation and Sun Tzu subterfuge.

LEARN from the ChiComs.

Chinese scientists (who may or may not believe what they are saying, because of omnipresent CCP infiltration, influence, control, and monitoring of all Chinese scientists) submitted – almost exactly 1 month after TES posted his work – a paper that is essentially COVER-UP of the evidence of mouse genetics in the lineage of Omicron which was revealed by TES.

The first link explains the paper in layman’s terms. The second link is to the paper itself.

LINK: https://basedunderground.com/2022/01/07/new-research-appears-to-confirm-that-omi-con-came-from-mice-indicating-likely-laboratory-origins/

PAPER: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8702434/

What’s really SMART about this ChiCom “fix” is that they’re using Didier Raoult’s work concerning minks as a pretext here. This is a VERY typical Chinese science-spy suck-up technique.

Had I not worked with a bunch of Chinese and Russian spies for decades, being completely on guard for their bullshit, and yet having fallen for it a few times in spite of that experience and suspicion, I would not appreciate just how EXTREMELY GOOD they are at doing this stuff.

They will WEAR YOU DOWN WITH THE SUGAR and then SLIDE THE KNIFE IN when you can’t possibly see it.

And I ain’t sayin’ CIA CHICKS are bad, either, if you know what I mean.

What can I say? This is just like the horrible Zhang paper “proving” masks “work”, which was then used by American Democrat politicians to justify their mask policies used in their electoral coup of Trump.

Science is no longer free of OMNIPRESENT DECEPTION. Treat it accordingly.

I simply cannot emphasize this enough.

The CCP has no respect for “global” science. NONE. They use it – abuse it – and destroy it – all in the name of holding power. All those who trust the CCP, or the people it manipulates and influences – including many American governmental and organizational leaders – are going to get BURNED.

Likewise, if you automatically treat the science that CCP touches as “real”, be prepared to stumble.


This proving that its 2018 release as a less-deadly immunity-builder prophylactic virus, and the subsequent release of the more-deadly Wuhan variant two years later, both originated from a weapons-grade bio-lab in China.

The beauty of this explanation is not only that it explains the genetics, but that it explains many facts which we observed. TES has a good run-down, but in general, the “pre-COVID almost-COVID bugs” that people observed WERE IN FACT SOMETHING.

I think the real question is how much HELP China got on “our side”.

This is straight out of modern Chinese warfare – to strike an enemy in such a way that the enemy does not even understand THAT they have been struck. By using a prior release as a vaccine, the Chinese avoided all blame for a second release on their own soil.

This is brilliant warfare.

This fully comports with a tactic that the ChiComs absolutely love – which is to publicly “anticipate” a warfare capability that they ALREADY OWN AND USE IN BATTLE.

You will notice that by later in 2021, a few of those infamous “Chinese colonels” began to engage in a kind of “wolf warrior braggadocio” over the idea that China had won a great biological warfare victory over the West, by virtue of their superior “response” to COVID-19, and thus that biological warfare needed to be a key part of *FUTURE* Chinese war-fighting strategy.

Do NOT be fooled by this.

What this means is that China is already using biological warfare – and has been for some time. When Chinese colonels do this stuff, it is a psychological operation.


China set up a red herring for the world to ‘discover’ at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its local seafood wet market, suggesting an unfortunate but understandable accident was being thinly concealed.

Again, the TES proposition explains so much about the multi-layer Chinese release cover-up, and all the subsequent, pre-calculated, pre-arranged back-pedaling.

First, there was bat soup.

Then there was no bat soup, but plenty of blame of racism. Clearly the work of the racist but infinitely self-hoaxing CCP.

Then I think it went to pangolins, and that was where I just started rolling my eyes. Smart people started believing blood samples (H/T Linda).

The Red Cross said it was definitely in America in December 2019.

Until somebody else proved October 2019.

And then the Italians proved it was prevalent in Europe in September 2019.

Again, the TES theory is perfect, explaining how the earlier “protective” viruses did a “long march” across Asia, thereby protecting China in a “mid-term practice run” of sorts – working out all the bugs, so to speak.

It just fits too well. Sorry, China.

AND – of course – this explains why the CIA and Twitter and the cut-out group “DRASTIC” created a double-down on a lab escape, conveniently proffered by a media that pilloried Trump for the same ideas, but realized that their “concession” would get Trump’s supporters to buy into a late release accident, to prevent them from seizing upon the highly explanatory idea of a two-stage release operation.

REALLY. They’re so easy to understand now.

Now, the problem for China is, that unlike all the other variants, Omicron stuck around for some reason, and is now spilling the beans on the whole sordid affair.

So – I have to ask – what is “some reason”?

Aubergine believes that the Omicron mildness is by White Hat design, and I almost have to agree.

Or perhaps there’s a bit of “AND” logic here.

Wouldn’t it be hilarious if the American military identified Omicron precursors in old blood samples, realized the actual viral timelines, realized that Omicron was a “remnant” of the Chinese pre-Wuhan “vaccine strain”, and essentially RE-DEPLOYED THE CHINESE VACCINE STRAIN as Omicron, in some fashion, at some time?

What this means is that instead of finding and using a racially selective bioweapon, which will inevitably be achieved and used by these racist CCP goons, but is still *possibly* a bit out of reach, the ChiComs worked with what they had on hand – a chronologically and geographically and immunologically selective BINARY bioweapon.

And yet – well – it’s blowing back a bit now. In more ways than one.

Interesting times just got more interesting.


Corbevax – The “Good” Vaccine That Sneaked Past The Criminals

I’ve already been pimping this crap online and IRL, and I have offered some opinions already, but now I’m ready to give you all a real run-down on it.

Here is my latest “pimp job” on The Gateway Pundit, on an article about some poor Israeli teenage girl who got killed by ONE INJECTION of the “clot shot”…..


WOLFM00N 2m

Any pro-vax out there who are even thinking of vaccinating your kids – WAIT FOR CORBEVAX.

  • no mRNA or cDNA
  • no full spike protein
  • no nanolipid technology
  • no Pfizer, Moderna, Wuhan or China involved
  • non-profit, developed by Texas vaccine expert Dr. Peter Hotez
  • professor of pediatrics at Baylor (yes – a pediatrician)
  • patent-free – anybody can make it
  • made in India (right now) – very cheap

Google “corbevax hotez” and get more information. This is an RBD subunit protein antigen vaccine – meaning it works around almost every WRONG THING that was done on purpose in the current vaccines in order to PUSH technology. This is an old-school vaccine.

If you’re hesitant, wait for a few months of results. The Phase III trial was good (zero serious side effects), but we all know better – a million doses have to go out before you really know how safe these things are.

IMO, the only safer vaccine would be this exact same type by nasal delivery.


SO – TMI – information overload for sure.

What did I say? Some safer vaccine?

YES – let’s start from the beginning now.


First, a hat tip to TheseTruths for a link to some OANN coverage of this new vaccine.

LINK: https://www.oann.com/texas-scientists-roll-out-patent-free-covid-19-vaccine-protein-based-corbevax-has-no-mrna/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/KxPPk


FTA:

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 10:26 AM PT – Wednesday, January 5, 2022

Texas scientists rolled out a new COVID-19 vaccine, saying it’s patent-free and can be produced by any manufacturer in any country. The vaccine, called Corbevax, was developed by the Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine.

It has successfully passed human trials as safe and effective. The new treatment is based off protein-based technology that has been used in other vaccines for decades and it does not use MRNA.

India has already authorized production of 100 million doses per month of the new vaccine. Meanwhile, Texas scientists say not-for-profit vaccines will help defeat COVID-19 quicker.

“We, about 10 years ago, started making coronavirus vaccines and the irony is that all of our processes are used with that in mind,” explained Professor Peter Hotez, M.D. Baylor College of Medicine. “We build in low cost processes from the beginning because our health economist that we’ve collaborated with have always said if you don’t make it for under a few dollars a dose, you might as well not make it at all. So that’s all we know how to do, is make low cost vaccines.” 


The irony here is rich. You can already tell by the price – this is the UBUNTU (Linux) of coronavirus vaccines. And yet, it has somehow managed to get the blessings of organizations owned by BILL GATES.

Yes, Hotez had to let Pfizer and Moderna go first, but I still find it amazing that Hotez got this vaccine past the wicked Bill Gates during his own lifetime.

Almost makes me wonder if Hotez got some help from his anti-vaxx enemies, putting pressure on the various CLOT SHOTS.

Hmmmmmm……

Yes, Professor Hotez actually DESPISES Sharyl Attkisson over the autism issue, and used to savage her on Twitter. Not sure if he’s blocked her, but I would not be surprised.

AND YET – well – just listen to him.

You heard him. The only leftist buzzword that Hotez left out was “sustainability”. It’s very clear that he knows how to do the university PC bullshit walk, and yet – this guy may end up saving millions of “Deplorable” lives, with a “plain Jane” vaccine that could actually have BENEFITS exceeding RISKS.

Let’s look at more coverage.

Here is a fluff piece written by HOTEZ HIMSELF and his colleague, Maria Elena Bottazzi, in good old super-wokester SCI-AM.

LINK: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-covid-vaccine-for-all/


Opinion

A COVID Vaccine for All

With proved technology and no-frills tech transfer, CORBEVAX is poised to reach hundreds of millions in the coming weeks

December 30, 2021

AUTHORS

Peter J. Hotez is a professor of pediatrics and molecular virology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he co-heads the Texas Children’s Center for Vaccine Development. He is the author of the newly released book Preventing the Next Pandemic: Vaccine Diplomacy in a Time of Anti-Science (Johns Hopkins University Press).  Follow Peter J. Hotez on Twitter

Maria Elena Bottazzi is co-director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development. She is also a professor of pediatrics and molecular virology and microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine and associate dean of its National School of Tropical Medicine.


I must STRONGLY recommend reading the ENTIRE ARTICLE, which is short and easy to understand.

It is absolutely DRIPPING with VAXZI NARRATIVE and PC BUZZWORDS – and yet one gets the sense that the entire project is planned, positioned, and poised to BRING DOWN THE CLOT SHOTS. Or perhaps just to race right past them, as they self-destruct.

FTA (buzzwords and key points emphasized BY ME):

Two years into the pandemic, CORBEVAX is the first COVID vaccine designed specifically for global health. It is a milestone for global vaccine equity, something we believe will overcome vaccine hesitancy, and serves as a blueprint for how to develop a potent vaccine for pandemic use in the absence of substantial public funding.

The vaccine prototype was first developed by scientists at Texas Children’s CVD and Baylor before it was licensed, with no patents or strings attached, to Biological E. Limited (BioE).

The central government of India has already ordered 300 million doses. And BioE, the company manufacturing the vaccine, plans to produce 100 million or more doses per month starting in February. Approximately 150 million doses have already been produced and are ready to roll out. In addition to what the company is supplying to India, BioE plans to deliver more than one billion additional doses to other countries.

What this means is that CORBEVAX will soon vaccinate more people than vaccine doses donated so far by the U.S. government or any other G7 country.

This new COVID vaccine has several distinct features that make it particularly suitable for use in resource-poor settings: it is safe, effective and can be locally produced at very high quantities. CORBEVAX is easy to store and inexpensive. We hope it will be used in low- and middle-income countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America, where vaccine availability has generally been abysmal.

CORBEVAX is made using technology that has been employed worldwide for decades, meaning that manufacturing processes are generally already well-known and won’t require a steep learning curve like the one needed for the scale-up of new technologies such as mRNA, adenovirus and protein particle vaccines.

CORBEVAX is made through microbial fermentation in yeast, similar to the process used to produce the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine that many resource-poor countries make and employ. This will allow for local manufacturing of COVID vaccines similar to CORBEVAX. Texas Children’s CVD and Baylor have already licensed the COVID vaccine technology to companies in Indonesia and Bangladesh and have licensed it for production in African countries such as Botswana. Such vaccine technology and licensing agreements, together with co-development partners, represent the ideal example of how COVID vaccines can and should be produced locally and widely in countries in the Global South.

Like the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine that comes from the same technology, CORBEVAX has an excellent safety profile. In a phase 3 trial conducted in India, CORBEVAX produced mainly mild adverse events, making it perhaps one of the safest COVID-19 vaccines in use.

When compared with doses of the AstraZeneca–University of Oxford vaccine manufactured by the Serum Institute of India, CORBEVAX also produced a higher amount of neutralizing antibodies against the Delta and Beta variants of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID (We expect to have Omicron data soon.) And it provided more durable and lasting protection. The vaccine neutralized variants of concern in laboratory animal studies and was highly protective in two nonhuman primate challenge trials. The trial results are being prepared for submission to a peer-reviewed journal.

As a recombinant protein vaccine developed from the receptor biding domain of the spike protein on the virus’s surface, combined with Dynavax Technologies’ CpG 1018 adjuvant with alum, the Texas Children’s CVD COVID vaccine can be stored using simple refrigeration. And like the hepatitis B vaccine, this COVID vaccine has one of the lowest costs of any available to date. No patents have been filed on the vaccine technology, and Texas Children’s CVD is assisting and co-developing the vaccine alongside BE and other vaccine producers in the Global South, which helps keep the cost low.


There is a research paper cited in the text, from Hotez and company, which shows that this is strong recombinant tech – it is NOT a rushed product.

Genetic modification to design a stable yeast-expressed recombinant SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain as a COVID-19 vaccine candidate

LINK: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304416521000519


Now you all may remember me talking about a German vaccinologist named Winfried Stoecker, who tried to develop and promote a very similar RBD vaccine – and who was shut down immediately by Angie The Dung Cow and her Green Shirts.

RBD_Regional_Antigenic_Vaccine_quadrupol-Mutante-3.png
RBD_Regional_Antigenic_Vaccine_quadrupol-Mutante-3.png

So why is Hotez positioned to vaccinate the world, and Stoecker remains OUT LIKE A CHUMP?

In my opinion, it’s because Peter Hotez plays their game and embraces the narrative with an almost perverse zeal and delight.

How perverse?

LINK: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/08/04/baylor-prof-urges-criticisms-of-fauci-and-other-scientists-prosecuted-as-hate-crimes/


YES. THIS is the ASSHOLE TROLL who suggested that criticism of Fauci should be a HATE CRIME.

And he did it in the scientific literature, too!!!


LINK: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001369

PDF: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001369&type=printable


In my opinion, this guy is like a “reality” version of the angry white faux-tranny Titania McGrath – a troll so perfect that it has to be real, or reality so SPOT-ON that it becomes a troll.

Peter Hotez is so authentically in compliance with the narrative, that he holds power over the hypocrites who force it on everybody else.

Thus, Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci are forced to go along with their own narrative, by this bow-tie bozo – this three-mask martinet of mandate over-compliance.

Don’t worry – this move away from the clot shot serves the agenda of Gates and Fauci, by covering their rear ends when the heat is on. The super-villains are not stupid, and did not rise to their levels of control by allowing guys like Hotez to be anything but a “parachute” of sorts, if their private jets catch fire.

Still, how did Hotez pull it off?

In my opinion, going to INDIA was the key move. India understands the precarious position they are in, thanks to CHINA JOE in the White House. India telling Pfizer to talk to the hand, and also backing off on trumpeting the virtues of ivermectin, are BOTH in my opinion connected to an exit via the Hotez vaccine.

HOTEZ had to know that INDIA was his key to getting HIS VACCINE produced.

INDIA had to know that HOTEZ was capable of bailing them out from the CLOT SHOT.

INDIA understood that HOTEZ was donating them a money-maker to gain leverage on the CLOT SHOT.

HOTEZ understood that INDIA needed an easy break to steal influence from CHINA.

Both HOTEZ and INDIA knew that BILL GATES, CHINA and BIDEN were weakened by CLOT SHOT blowback, and were not in a position to keep the murderous ruse of the CLOT SHOT going.

The HOTEZ VACCINE could be delayed at first, but it could not be stopped, because CLOT SHOT problems would eventually make it impossible to delay or stop any other reasonable vaccines.

All in all, a beautiful chess game of scientific leverage.

So who wins?

In my opinion – GOD.

Matthew 18:6

But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.

Peter Hotez is very clear about the pediatric possibility of this vaccine. No matter what, I think he REALLY wants to help kids. If his vaccine isn’t “Clot Shot, Jr.”, then I think he may just do that.

We anticipate people will readily accept CORBEVAX and similar recombinant protein COVID vaccines, including for pediatric use. And clinical trials in children are also underway in India. Parents may even be more willing to accept CORBEVAX than vaccines made with a newer technology. If there was ever a COVID vaccine that might triumph over vaccine hesitancy and refusal, we believe this could be the one.

Is this vaccine better than simply catching the disease? We’ll see.

After what Pfizer, Moderna, Fauci, Gates and Biden have done, I trust NATURE more than vaccines. But I also “trust” some vaccines more than others.

I HOPE that THIS one – Corbevax – may be the new “gold standard” of coronavirus vaccine safety.

Additional References:

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/india-approves-corbevax-here-s-all-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-covid-19-vaccine/ar-AAScPB4

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/12/28/unpatented-shot-dubbed-worlds-covid-19-vaccine-wins-emergency-approval-india


Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

spanker

noun

On a square rigged ship, the spanker is a gaff-rigged fore-and-aft sail set from and aft of the aftmost mast. (Wikipedia)

The swinging, pole-controlled, triangular or quadrilateral sail or sails at the back end of a sailing ship. (Wolf)

The word has other definitions related to spanking (slapping or striking on the back end) that we will set aside for the moment.

Used in a sentence:

Our wonderful flag flew from the spanker of the Lady Washington.

Used in a picture:

https://historicalseaport.org/lady-washington-history/

Used in a video:

In the process of finding this video – passing over videos about – well – you can guess – I found THIS one, from Australia. The title is misleading – designed to get clicks and subscribers.

It’s worth watching to see the good and the bad of the Australian spring this last October.

Suddenly, I’m glad I’m in America.


ENJOY THE SHOW

Have another great week!

W

DEAR KAG: 20220107 – The Pub is OPEN / TES Special Edition / Pimp Your Coof Kit / Dealing With Uncertainty / ThEthSkep’s Big Fix of All Things Coof: CCP Hiding Chinese 2018 Release of SARS-CoV-2 Virus

The Pub is OPEN!

Yeah, we still have staffing problems, but who doesn’t under China Joe?

While off to a rocky start, we are staying open as many days of the week as possible, just like some of the small businesses that I patronize.

Keep up that LOCAL PRESSURE on the Biden cabal by going to school board meetings and supporting TRUE non-monopoly capitalism – it SKEERS Kapo and Little Red Jen somethin’ FIERCE.

Likewise, patronize those SMALL BLOGS that provide new viewpoints and ideas!


We Serve Whiskey And Guns To Indians Here!

Yup! FREEDOM is GOOD TROUBLE, and we’re in favor of it, for everybody, much to the consternation of our local maskies and vaxxies.


I had the special pleasure of being “refused service” by a maskie recently – he simply walked away from the cash register and went into the back. Some of it was due to race. Having been “not served” because of race before, I can spot that fairly easily, and this person was not exactly “hard to read”.

Three other staffers (all forced to wear masks, sadly) came to my assistance and took my order.

I maintained a pleasant demeanor, as part of one of several psychological warfare tactics that I have adopted recently, in fighting against the VAXZIS and MASKZIS.


While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we continue to ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.

So what’s on the ODD BAR’S CRAZY MENU this week?

We’ve served alcohols our first week, including menthol, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine.

Next, we served amines , including second generation antihistamines.

Today, we’ll toast each other with an element that we’ll borrow from Steve…..

…..and some very special natural alcohols and derivatives, including among the 4 of them, 3 terpenoids, 2 phenols, 1 ester, and 1 ether.

More on these wonderful “liqueurs” later!


Christmas Spirit

There’s still time to spread omicron! GET BUSY!!!

While we do have some members out with Omicron now, including Brave and Free, the real question is whether we’re going to see a big peak in March and April, like we did in 2020.

And if you’re gonna get sick, you might at least consider having some willing cohort, looking for that natural immunity, to get sick with you!

thank you
thank you pictures

Ah, thanks to SMILEY for reminding me of the goofy fun of these wonderful but stupid GIFs called “Blingees”!

And now, the rules of the pub.


HOUSE RULES

God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.

Now, back to business.


AMEN!


Current Art On The Wall

Now for something a bit different…..

Vector background. Molecules and chemical formulas

…..and something a bit more familiar.

David Teniers the Younger (1610–1690), The Alchemist, ca. 1643–45. Oil on panel, 20 1/8 x 28 in (51 x 71 cm). Herzog Anton Ulrich Museum, Braunschweig (139)

LINK: https://www.metmuseum.org/blogs/now-at-the-met/2020/alchemy-science-making-marvels


TES Special Edition

As one of the early “discoverers” of The Ethical Skeptic on Twitter, I was happy that I was able to get a few people interested in his precise and well-considered thoughts on things – especially regarding the phony scamdemic. TES was always utterly perturbed by the bad science of the “pandemic”, and worked on a daily basis to “correct the fact checkers” – which was all of hilarious, sad, and joyful.

After I was kicked off Twitter, I rarely saw him, due to my own laziness, really, but in 2021, some GREAT links to The Ethical Skeptic’s work popped up here. THANK YOU, to all who follow him and keep us informed.

THIS was a classic.

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2019/03/07/nelsonian-inference-and-cultivated-ignorance/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/wZKYb

This work really helped me to GRASP and understand the leftist tactic of “pretending not to know”, and – more importantly – how to spot it.

So let’s look at some of his even more recent stuff.


Pimp Your Coof Kit

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/12/29/our-household-covid-kit-item-listing/

This one got us all thinking about “coof kits”, and GA/FL suggested some of us putting up our own versions. I initially thought that this might not be a good idea, because people’s needs and medical situations really VARY – one of the main reasons that “practicing medicine without a license” is actually a bad idea in normal times. I thought it better to have a broader discussion.

However, I just realized that I did put up a kind of “minimal” kit last week, and it’s worth looking at it.

This kit was designed for people who DON’T have a smart plan already figured out, and don’t want to investigate “hard to find” things like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

Here is what I had, followed by my earlier reasoning. The main change is adding Vitamin C, as discussed below.


Wolf’s COVID Care Package

  • Thermometer (thermal digital is easiest)
  • Antigen test kit(s) (yeah, good luck finding one, although they are coming back after New Years)
  • Antihistamine of your choice (Claritin, Zyrtec, and Allegra are the easiest – 1-2 a day)
  • Aspirin (regular, or low-dose if your stomach doesn’t like it – 1 a day)
  • Listerine or Betadine mouthwash/gargle for mouth and throat
  • Vitamins C and D, Zinc, Calcium, Magnesium, Multivitamin including Selenium.
  • Quercetin (including natural sources) or Green Tea
  • Saline or other nasal spray, rinse, or wash of your choice

The thermometer tells you when to use your precious test kit – when you suddenly have a fever and a sore or tingly throat.

The test kit gets you a positive diagnosis that opens doors for things like antibodies, or an official test.

A positive test means you can BEGIN TREATMENT at THERAPEUTIC DOSES.

The antihistamine insures that YOU WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY NOT DIE, because it stops the second, allergic, inflammatory stage of COVID in its tracks.

The aspirin makes doubly sure you won’t get clots, but be careful – don’t take it if you’ve had trouble with aspirin. Talk to your doctor if unsure.

The gargles (Listerine or Betadine) massively reduce viral load and speed time to recovery.

The saline and nasal washes lower viral load, and maintain nasal breathing.

The quercetin and green tea help zinc’s antiviral action by increasing cellular zinc levels.

The vitamins and mineral supplements keep you at antiviral levels of these things. In particular, zinc and vitamin D3 need to be at non-deficient levels.

Please consult authoritative sources from TRUE medical doctors like the ones at https://flccc.net.


Cthulhu noted that I hadn’t mentioned Vitamin C – I have now added that, because it’s likely to help and can’t hurt (“First, do no harm”) and also follows the McCullough Principle (“Signals of Benefit, Acceptable Safety”). I don’t think it’s nearly as important as the antihistamine and “clot-blocker”, but I do have to admit that Vitamin C was certainly far better than nothing when I survived Wuhan with only mild lung damage.

What I’m going to do now is to encourage all of YOU to talk about your “war chests” and “coof kits”, and explain your reasonings about things.

This will help people who are deciding what THEY might want to add to their kits – OR REMOVE, if there is something better for their particular situation.

Remember – everybody has their own unique medical needs.

I will put my thoughts in the comments, just like everybody else.

NOW – about those natural “essential oils” in Listerine.

Let’s look at them.


Menthol


Thymol


Eucalyptol (2 views)


Methyl salicylate


These are all natural substances of roughly the same molecular size and composition (mostly carbon and hydrogen with 1-3 oxygen atoms), all of them being either pungent oily liquids or smelly, vaporous crystalline solids.

There are some relations between these things.

Thymol is basically menthol where the 6-membered ring has been made benzenoid – meaning like benzene – with 3 double bonds.

Notice that methyl salicylate is also benzenoid. Methyl salicylate is related to aspirin, and has similar activities. Don’t drink Listerine, even though the amounts are (believe it or not) rather small.

Eucalyptol is also structurally related to menthol, although it’s harder to see. Try to see it.

All of these natural substances, when isolated from their sources, were very early pharmaceuticals. They ALL have pharmacological activities, which many would regard as “primitive” by today’s standards, and yet, gargling Listerine is PROVEN to be extremely effective in reducing viral load of COVID-19 variants – about 80% as effective as iodine solutions.

Why might this be? Here is just ONE small line of immunological evidence.

LINK: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9810029/

To be honest, we’re a bit late to the game here. Native Australians from the first wave of immigration, roughly 65,000 years ago, discovered the utility of eucalyptol by their own investigations.

LINK: https://successfulaffiliateru.com/medicinal-use-of-eucalyptus-the-australian-aboriginal-way/

Here is some additional information about early Australian medicine using natural products.

LINK: https://theconversation.com/the-art-of-healing-five-medicinal-plants-used-by-aboriginal-australians-97249

There is a great picture of what is essentially a native doctor’s medical bag in the second link. When it freaks you out a bit, let it. This is a way of getting you to appreciate human intelligence outside your modern experience.


Lastly – IODINE.

I have not tried this, and I am not sure I would like it, but it’s a viable option, IMO. I actually like Listerine, and it worked for me on delta, so I’m happy with that. I did NOT try Listerine in the nasal cavity. Not sure that I’d like that. I stuck to saline.

I did find a paper that showed Listerine to be roughly 80% as effective as povidone-iodine.

Here is link to a review which states something similar, and a summary of the review.

LINK: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7842245/


Executive summary

Methods

  • A review of literature was conducted regarding the use of commercially available antiseptics and SARS-CoV-2.

Results

  • Povidone-iodine (betadine), ethanol and essential oils (Listerine) and a combination of xylitol and iota-carrageenan (purified from red marine algae) were shown to reduce viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro by 3–4 log10 in 30 s.
  • Chlorhexidine, a widely used oral rinse, does not act as quickly in reducing viral load in 30 s as povidone-iodineI, but binds to cell proteins, extending protection.
  • Hydrogen peroxide is not as effective as other oral rinses in vitro and cell toxicity is a concern.
  • Hypertonic saline is not directly virucidal, but halts replication by increasing hypochlorous acid inside the cell.

Conclusion

  • Several commonly used nasal antiseptics and gargles have shown efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and clinical trials are currently underway to study their impact on disease course and transmission.

Future perspective

  • These commercially available products should be further evaluated due to their potential ability to reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses that are yet to emerge.

You can also make your own povidone-iodine gargles and nasal rinses – Dr. McCullough has retweeted a nice recipe for this. Click through to Twitter for more information.

Here is a great long post on all of these methods, including hydrogen peroxide – an alternative to iodine.

LINK: https://jeffreydachmd.com/2021/09/povidone-iodine-mouth-wash-rinse-gargle-for-c0-ld-prevention/

Do beware that some people need to be careful with iodine, including people with hypothyroid.

LINK: https://www.webmd.com/diet/foods-high-in-iodine#1

LINK: https://www.webmd.com/vitamins/ai/ingredientmono-35/iodine


Dealing With Uncertainty

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/12/24/the-riddle-of-certainty/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.ph/wpfWu

This is another GREAT article, talking about one of my FAVORITE complaints about modern science, which has resulted from a really SICK and UNHEALTHY compartmentalization, as well as insulation of scientists from internal criticism (lack of “herd review”). This condition has allowed all sorts of pathological science to gain ascendancy without check, balance, or proper community criticism.

For example, CLIMATE CHANGE gets more input from FINANCIERS than it does from the many scientists like me who think we are acting irrationally and presumptuously on ERRORS. These errors have been induced by the WRONG forces – beneficiaries not committed to truth – within a small pathologically influenced community – much like what’s going on with improperly influenced government science and the “clot shot”.

This piece by The Ethical Skeptic contains a graphic using a BULLSEYE which you really need to see. It makes a very important point about science – which I can apply DIRECTLY to Anthony Fauci.

Fauci’s extreme focus on antibodies to the spike protein as a nearly sole measure of “success” of the “clot shot”, is a perfect example of what TES is talking about.

I have referred to Fauci’s over-focus as “antibody hypnosis”. In fact, I see this kind of obsession and compulsion repeatedly throughout his career, and would wager that:

  • it’s why he always “wins” against the Judy Mikovitses and the Kary Mullises
  • it’s why he’s so highly paid
  • it’s why he’s tied to so many “grim reaper” experiments
  • it’s why corrupt industry loves him, and is in bed with him

TES makes a general point about the kinds of information which actually provide STRONGER PROOF – and this set includes something I love – INDEPENDENT CONFIRMATION BY ALTERNATE LINES OF REASONING – not just “duplication of results” and “confirmation of results” – which are both sadly lacking as well, but not nearly as important.

I have powerful, direct experiences in science with the need for RESOLVED DIVERSE INPUTS and AVOIDANCE OF HYPNOTIC REASONING as safeguards against pathological science.

However, THEY (and I mean “they”) are using various forms of hypnosis, including MASS, COMMUNITY, PEER, and INDIVIDUAL to advance science in ways that THEY want.

Human science is far more controlled than we either admit or understand.

Anyway, back to the article.

There is a quote from Elon Musk therein which is really worth your while, and which TES puts in the context of what he is talking about.

Bluntly, it feels wonderful to know that SOMEBODY GETS IT.

What Musk is talking about here is basically the “bullseye” metaphor that TES uses. And THAT is related to the following item.

While Fauci is very committed to the LEVELS of his antibodies, he has not properly processed feedback that would indicate he’s OPTIMIZING THE WRONG THING.

Here is a link to Steve Kirsch’s interpretation of Sucharit Bhakdi’s and Arne Burkhardt’s analysis of people who died after vaccination, showing that these deaths were ALMOST ALL related to the “clot shot”.

LINK: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/bhakdiburkhardt-pathology-results

Kirsch REALLY explains this well. Malone takes note of this, too.

IMO, it would appear that Fauci is optimizing the WRONG ANTIBODIES in the WRONG WAY, because the vaccines are CREATING the WRONG ANTIBODIES in the WRONG PLACES.

Please read Kirsch’s article and then the Bhakdi-Burkhardt paper to understand this.

PAPER: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/end-covax.pdf

Now, Fauci may be optimizing the wrong antibodies in the wrong places for a variety of reasons. Those exact reasons are not nearly as important as the fact that they are simply WRONG.

I believe Bhakdi, Burkhardt, and Kirsch – this is a risky vaccine, and now we begin to understand WHY.

Based on this knowledge, I personally will not be taking these vaccines.

In my opinion, these results CLEARLY show that vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 should not be effected by IM injections of a full SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and even more emphatically so, NOT by genetic vaccines delivered by IM injections. In my very early opinion, this is going to be a CLASSIC case for using RBD antigen (protein) and/or nasal delivery as a concession to the virus – with nasal delivery being used as a SAFETY feature and NOT merely a convenience.

To have SAFER vaccines for DISCRIMINATING SHOPPERS like me, we’re going to have to compromise with the virus. That’s just the way it is.

There may be SOME who thought that we could arrive at a compromise that would reduce human populations, but frankly I don’t like that deal.

In my opinion, ANYBODY with vascular, cardiac, clotting, or other issues like WANTING TO HAVE KIDS SOMEDAY, or NOT RISKING CANCER, should absolutely avoid the current clot shots.

In my opinion, the clot shot is stupidity advanced by greedy people who are controlled and manipulated by really evil people. In other words, it’s not stupid, greedy, or evil – it’s ALL OF THE ABOVE.

The DISEASE is no picnic, and I can see some people making the risk-benefit calculation in favor of the vaccine – particularly newer RBD antigen vaccines like Corbevax (Hotez/Baylor/India/open-source). But if people are dying in 5 years from experimental mRNA vaccines with the full spike protein – well, that is exactly like the RISK that one takes with SMOKING SOMETHING YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND.

Seriously, most Americans would refuse to take a novel “legal” or illegal designer drug, given stories like the “bath salts” and “Parkinson’s heroin” experiences which shocked the public in horror headlines.

Parkinson’s from Designer Heroin (Ironically related to Paraquat)

LINK: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1985-07-29-me-5136-story.html

LINK: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28282815/

VIDEOS: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=mptp&iax=videos&ia=videos (warning – they’re really sad)

Effects of “Bath Salts” (Euphemism for CCP Designer Drugs)

LINK: https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2014/06/16/321779232/how-bath-salts-a-drug-made-in-china-wreaked-havoc-in-the-u-s

LINK: https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdny/pr/akron-man-arrested-importing-bath-salts-china

The CLOT SHOT is a RISK, and not all of us will want to take that risk.

Mandating that risk is EVIL, IMO, and Democrats deserve to DIE AT THE POLLS in November for it.

Period.

They have BLOOD on their hands.


ThEthSkep’s Big Fix of All Things Coof

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/11/15/chinas-ccp-concealed-sars-cov-2-presence-in-china-as-far-back-as-march-2018/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/zww1q

This is what I really wanted to show you, right here.

The Ethical Skeptic, or TES, or “ThEthSkep“, as I sometimes call him, has proven to my satisfaction that CCP lied even MORE than we previously thought possible.

Is this hard to believe? That we got CHUMPED by CHINA yet again?

Yeah. Getting chumped by China YET AGAIN is a thing.

I am tempted to try to construct an “elevator pitch” of ThEthSkep’s argument, and have even asked him (in a moderated comment) if he could provide such a short explanation that I could pitch to others.

If he DOES provide one, I will do an entire post on it.

For the moment, I will just give you my “two paragraph description” of his very long and elegant post, which post I can guarantee most here will have trouble following.

TES argues that setting an earlier date for the actual initial Chinese release of an ancestral pathogen to current SARS-CoV-2, provides a far better explanation of the facts at hand, as well as some facts which he generated through analysis of the genetics of SARS-CoV-2 variants, than does the “standard model” of a late 2019 release, whether that late release is taken from the early Chinese LIES about a zoonotic outbreak in December 2019, or from the October 2019 Wuhan lab activities which have always struck me as potential disinformation.

In particular, an early 2018 release of a less pathogenic ancestor explains the omicron variant’s surprisingly early 2020 appearance and low pathogenicity so well, and China’s population resistance to the more pathogenic Wuhan variant, whether that was a descendant or (my thinking) a new release, that IMO it is the duty of the “standard model” to explain all of the facts better than the TES theory.

Now, like I said, this post by TES is not an easy read, even for those with some knowledge of the field, and even for those experienced in reading the scientific literature. He moves at “review speed” through a lot of reasoning and even his own work, which is not all shown, but which is all fully described and referenced.

I am actually WAITING for my first reading to fully sink in, but I can tell you this. As soon as I “freed myself” from the necessity of a late 2019 release, everything “coof” just started falling into place.

This is one of those things that starts generating RESETS in my mind, on everything I had thought before. Once you see what TES is getting at, it’s almost impossible to unsee it.

AND I CAN GO FURTHER.


I talk to a LOT of people, and listen carefully to their thinking about COVID. One of my sources is somebody who has a lot of contacts in Europe and Asia, especially India, due to working for an international firm.

That person strongly believes, based on illnesses within the corporation as well as associated entities, that something like COVID-19 was already circulating worldwide during ALL of 2019.

I had set this aside, unable to fit it into everything else I knew. NOW, however, it makes easy sense. In fact, the details which I don’t want to give, fit his model of spread EXACTLY.

If TES is correct, and I believe he is, then WE WERE DEALING WITH VARIANTS EVEN BEFORE THE CDC BEGAN TALKING ABOUT VARIANTS. In fact, they never told us that THE ORIGINAL WAS LIKELY JUST A VARIANT OF SOME PRIOR VARIANT.

And THIS explains much better why Fauci, Baric, Dazsak, and all the others were ready to cover up – because a virus related to their research had already gotten out in 2018. Going along with the Chinese story was a RELIEF to them – and they grabbed on tightly.

In other words, a conspiracy of aligning interests, not something discussed on paper or by phone. It’s a brilliant Chinese move, actually. Proffer a lie and see if our own scientists will join them in it.

The USEFUL IDIOT American media? NO PROBLEM.


And not just THAT stuff, but now we have much more evidence that these bugs could have been “in the wild” EVERYWHERE – including possibly just outside the Baric lab, near where Gail Combs picked up a “coofy” bug much earlier than would have been possible with a late 2019 release. (I will let her address the time-frames.)

Consider that China could even have been trying to FRAME or intimidate Baric with a stateside release in the vicinity of his lab. Why? Because NOW we have MOTIVE.

Does it make sense NOW that these highly contagious bugs could have been getting out willy-nilly from these laboratories? Or that China has been playing fast and loose with biological releases?

What does this mean?

It means that the whole NIH-Fauci-Wuhan complex has been in cover-up mode, trying to SAVE THEIR DANGEROUS RESEARCH which they know is VERY likely to be SHUT DOWN BY A CONGRESS RUN BY THE PEOPLE – no matter WHAT THE CAUSE OF THIS RELEASE.

Remember how I said the President Wolf Moon would send a cruise missile into every BSL level 4 that didn’t shut down immediately upon his inauguration? Those missiles armed with whatever insured that all viruses were FRIED?

See the motive to get rid of Trump now? WE THE PEOPLE cannot be allowed to interfere with their “holy” research.

And wait – there’s MOAR.


Somewhere in the years between 2005 and 2010, around the time I got an extremely SARS-CoV-2-like infection, complete with anosmia, exhaustion, and “sore lung”, I took note of the fact that all of my Asian colleagues in the “anti-CCP” camp became very religious about taking COVID-like precautions in our CCP-Chinese-infested workplace. These precautions included isolation, surface and aerosol measures, like wipes, air filters, and even clothing choices.

Most of us dismissed it as an “Asian thing” like masks, even though it was a sudden and new social phenomenon, but because I had contacts in that community who were sometimes sources of insight on CCP skulduggery, I noticed that ONLY the “antis” were engaging in the protective behaviors – the mainlanders and pro-CCP Hong Kongers/Taiwanese were not.

Interestingly, I was not getting any good information on the trend – unlike other scuttlebutt at the time.

Was it real or disinformation? Was it an op to flush out the antis? Was it “anti” paranoia?

I have no idea. But I personally think that China has been up to “bio-tricks” for a LONG time – as in back BEFORE SARS (2003).

If 2018 is the first time China released any biologicals, I would be VERY surprised.

SO – see what you think. Read this sucker, and then think about it.

I think TES is onto something.


A Note About January 6 – and More

I have been avoiding all things January 6, largely because I don’t want to give Nancy Gambino any “lift” as far as her phony “investigation” into HER OWN CRIME.

I understand her game plan, and I’m not going to play along.

I would have loved to have recounted that amazing day in another long, glowing, “all about me and my experiences” post, but no.

THIS IS WAR.

In my opinion, we can bring down these horrible communists faster by focusing on whatever WE want to focus on.

Nancy says “the fight is over here”.

NOPE. Go to hell, Mafia Bitch. We know what you did. With Kapo’s dirty FBI. And the backing of Mitch McConnell and SCOFFLAW SCOTUS.

Some may want to join the fight against Pelosi right now, and please feel free to “follow Darren Beattie into Pelosi’s breach”, but I think that MANDATES are going to kill these bastards at the polls, if we just help them commit electoral suicide.

Expose the “clot shot” risks more fully, and show that the mandates are MORE EVIL.

We need to make Democrats – destroying America for GREED under the cover of virtue signals – absolutely unelectable, and I think we can.

ENJOY THE SHOW.

Thank you all for being here. Have a great weekend.

W

What (or who) killed all of these children? The WORLD deserves to KNOW

This is the most shocking and horrifying thing I have ever researched and written about. I’m putting that up front, mostly to explain my lapse in pursuing it far enough when I first found it. I have had an atavistic and instinctive revulsion to this story which clouded my normally curious mind, that I will now attempt to make up for. This feels like brushing up against the Devil, himself. Please forgive my cowardice.

A couple of weeks ago, a video with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. was posted here on the Q Tree. In it, he mentions that a researcher for his book saw hundreds of children’s coffins under astroturf in a cemetery in New York. He stated that the children died as a result of experiments with AIDS drugs conducted by Anthony Fauci and crew. Of course, the video, which was in a Tweet, has been removed by Twitter. But our wonderful Gail Combs posted a full video from Rumble:

LINK: https://rumble.com/vqzb8y-episode-1496-fauci-on-trial.html

Here is the link to Gail’s comment, which also contains a transcript of the BBC video, Guinea Pig Kids. I highly recommend reading it. It is shocking and chilling.

LINK: https://www.theqtree.com/2021/12/19/dear-maga-20211219-open-topic/#comment-844931

In the Tweet video, as Kennedy talked about the graves, the name of the cemetery was mentioned. I immediately wondered if it would be possible to find the gravesite. God help me, I did.

I went looking at Findagrave.com. Here is the first link I found:

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/48515693/baby-boy-gasino

For the record here, the person at Findagrave who posted these photos asked that they not be posted and claimed by others as their work. I am not doing that; all photos here are available at Findagrave, and the links lead to them.

There is a photo of a mass headstone within this child’s listing:

https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2010/52/48515693_126686814948.jpg

The first year date on this headstone was 1988. This grave contains children who died from 1988 through 1992. Here is a photo of the other side of the monument:

https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2010/98/50857954_127081915398.jpg

Wolf Moon suggested I send this information and the photos to The Gateway Pundit, which I did. The following day, they broke the story!

After some discussion of this the following day, I returned to Findagrave to look again. I found this photograph:

https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2009/292/43344514_125607867459.jpg

I noted the dates on this headstone at the time as being different from the dates I remembered from the first photo I found. Sadly, this is when my “denial” kicked in, and I did not pursue what this might mean. Not just another river in Egypt, denial. I did NOT want to see what was in front of me. I convinced myself I had seen it wrong the first time; I didn’t even go back to check. I convinced myself that the reference to “hundreds” of coffins in the RFK, Jr. video was hyperbole.

Please forgive me.

Skipping ahead to yesterday…

Wolfmoon posted the original headstone photo I found in response to a question from GA/FL. She had missed the original discussion of the RFK, Jr. video and the subsequent discussion and photos from the cemetery:

LINK: https://www.theqtree.com/2022/01/02/dear-maga-20220102-open-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-851286

Looking at the photo, I realized that the dates that I had seen in the two different photos really were from two different time periods; were in fact, two different sets of deaths. I knew I had work to do. I went back to Findagrave.com, and resumed searching. Sadly, there was much to find.

The following are photos of mass headstones for children spanning the time period from 1988 though 2012. Many of the children on these stones do not have given names, they are known only as “Baby Boy” or “Baby Girl.” These photos speak for themselves, of unimaginable suffering:


[NOTE by Wolf – these additional pictures are obviously not the complete list of names from 1988-2012, as they do not cover the complete faces of the headstones, nor all the years in evidence. These pictures are merely enough to demonstrate the veracity of Aubergine’s research. Researchers are encouraged to use the original genealogical resources.]

https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2010/98/50857954_127081915398.jpg


https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2010/137/52525121_127419999244.jpg


https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2010/162/53582349_127635753820.jpg


https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2010/16/46790333_126376182142.jpg


https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2009/292/43344514_125607867459.jpg



https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2011/12/64150817_129494393447.jpg


https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2011/23/64633534_129590903246.jpg


What killed these children?

The dates on the headstones end in 2012.

No sane person could look at these headstones and claim these were natural deaths. There are too many. These are orphaned or abandoned children, many with no given name. We deserve to know what happened to all of these innocents. I DEMAND TO KNOW.

I write this in tears for all of these babies. I write this so that others will SEE.

God, please help people to SEE. We MUST avenge the deaths of these children. They cannot have died in vain.

I leave you with this, which was written for a beloved lost child:


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION – ADDED FROM COMMENTS

Aubergine

Aubergine(@aubergine)

Online

Wolf

Reply to  Wolf Moon | Threat to Demonocracy

January 4, 2022 09:45

Wolf, Incarnation Children’s Center is still operating. But the graves stop in 2012. Are no children dying there anymore? I doubt that. So where are they being buried?

I don’t even want to show you this. I really don’t. But look at this link, and scroll down. Look at the dates, and at the section where they are buried, over on the right. I think it’s another one. There is no marker for these:

https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/65944/memorial-search?firstname=Baby&middlename=&lastname=&cemeteryName=Saint+Charles+Cemetery&birthyear=&birthyearfilter=&deathyear=&deathyearfilter=&memorialid=&mcid=&linkedToName=&datefilter=&orderby=r&plot=&page=1#sr-174845461

Aubergine

Aubergine(@aubergine)

Online

Wolf

Reply to  Wolf Moon | Threat to Demonocracy

January 4, 2022 10:31

#851801

Compare and contrast.

After finding the over 900 children in the St. Vincent de Paul Section of St. Charles Cemetery, link in comment below, I thought I would check another big state, to see what I would find. What if this is common, and there are orphan babies buried like this all over, no medical experimentation, just normal death.

Well, here’s Texas, same time frame. NOTE that there are only 983 matching records for “Baby” who died post-1988. NOTE that the birth dates as you scroll down are KNOWN, where they are NOT in New York. NOTE that there are individual markers for these children. NOTE that if you click on a listing, it will NOT say “death date may be internment date,” which most of the Baby graves listed at St. Charles read.

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/search?firstname=Baby&middlename=&lastname=&birthyear=&birthyearfilter=&deathyear=1988&deathyearfilter=after&location=Texas%2C+United+States+of+America&locationId=state_46&memorialid=&mcid=&linkedToName=&datefilter=&orderby=r&plot=

I also searched California, and found similar results to Texas.

This appears to be confined to NEW YORK. New York is a NIGHTMARE.

Aubergine

Aubergine(@aubergine)

Online

Wolf

Reply to  Gail Combs

January 4, 2022 10:55

#851813

In ALL of California for the same time period, post-1988, there are only 784 graves with the first name “Baby.”

NOTE ADDED BY WOLF

The above was written by Aubergine. I have not changed, deleted, or added anything beyond “The” to “Gateway Pundit”. I added the header image, categories, and keywords. I tidied up the images and videos as well. That’s it. The barest of edits – because I want these to be Aubergine’s own words.

The following are my words.

Under any circumstances, even the most benign – even the most benevolent – mass graves deserve the strongest of accounting for. These are not normal circumstances.

The facts are that ONE mass grave – of childrenat this cemetery – has been linked by professional journalists to US government research conducted under the auspices of Dr. Anthony Fauci. Whether that research was ethical or not is open for discussion, but as far as I know, the most basic facts are not in contention.

When Aubergine first found the 1988-1992 gravestone, I knew this was an important proof of the reality of the prior journalism. I encouraged her to take this proof to The Gateway Pundit, and am very happy that she did, for I did not want to pressure her. Aubergine is a professional genealogist, as was my dear mother, and I appreciate that evaluating the strength of evidence in genealogy is difficult, and as much an art as a science. Judgment of such things can only be made by a dedicated genealogist, not by an editor with only limited experience in the field.

When the headstone of a mass grave with a different date was posted some time after that, I was not sure what to make of it. I believe that at the time, some of us speculated it might have been more “Fauci children”, but – like Aubergine – I felt it necessary to be skeptical of BOTH mass graves. Perhaps the modern “pauper’s grave” is handled this way. Perhaps the original journalism cited by RFK, Jr. had been faulty or misinterpreting evidence in some way. Perhaps most of these were NOT “Fauci children”.

Perhaps these mass graves were – to proffer a really bad excuse – normal.

I agree with Aubergine – that choice was likely a product of some denial, although as a scientist, I am VERY used to denial of my own thinking. A strong and earnest “testing denial” is de rigueur in the scientific mindset. Falsifying and exonerating evidence must not just be acknowledged and kept secret – it must be championed. At that point, I didn’t feel like we had enough to go beyond mere speculation, for or against the prior journalism, and thus I did not feel any need to “escalate” the evidence. I decided to wait for more evidence – so often a good move in this business.

In contrast, when Aubergine discovered that there were many times the number of mass graves at this cemetery, I felt it was both of our duties to quickly prepare a report which could be linked, cited, and forwarded by others, and then either validated or explained by others. We needed to bring this to people’s attention.

I have no proof that these additional mass graves are in any way connected to the first, which is alleged to be connected to US government medical research, but based upon the prior journalism, the question ABSOLUTELY must be asked.

In different times, with a different government – one not routinely referred to as a “regime” – I could see letting go of the question. But this is not the case.

We are under a federal government which has LIED to us – which has TRICKED us – which has quite literally killed my fellow Americans without apology or reparation. It is a government which seeks only power and money, taking both by any means necessary or at hand. Even now, it artfully constructs “dilemmas” like a phony 50:50 Senate, using shared electoral deceits, in order to create false dramas of calibrated theft and calculated usurpation.

The fact that Anthony Fauci – protected by rules which mean NOBODY can remove him – helped construct the “communist cold” used to usurp our government – says it all. Neither Fauci nor the rest of the government can be trusted. And yet Fauci is alleged to be connected to the deaths of these children.

It falls on We The People – including free and honest scientists and journalists – to investigate this matter.

Thus, we pose a question to the world.

Are ANY, SOME, or ALL of these children in mass graves – from 1988 to 2012 – connected in ANY WAY to government research?

We do not need to answer this immediately. We just need to answer it FULLY and TRUTHFULLY.

W


Addendum by Gail Combs

Wolf here. I am adding some relevant information submitted by Gail Combs, whose mother died as the result of medical experimentation. [ She is referred to as “Mom” in the text. ]

Again, I have not edited this beyond simple clarifying corrections, such as spelling, capitalization, the proper editing of links, etc.

I had asked Gail if we had discussed the testing of remdesivir on children, which I definitely recall discussing with SOMEBODY. I think we may have been thinking of two different discussions, and perhaps I’m thinking of somebody other than Gail. It doesn’t matter – the following discussion by Gail is still relevant.

-W


Gail Combs

I think it is important to put Fauci in context with the longer history of the US government.

 I did not have Remdesivir experiments on children, what I had is the history of the US government’s ILLEGAL RESEARCH ON HUMANS.

Fauci would have been in the US government for most of this time. He obtained his M.D. from Cornell University Medical College in 1966 and and began his 53-year career at NIH in 1968
He became Director of NIH in 1984.

Remember his wife is head of BIO-ETHICS.

….According to Christine Grady’s profile on the NIH website, she is a nurse-bioethicist and senior investigator serving as the Chief of the Department of Bioethics. Her research focuses on the “ethics of clinical research, including informed consent, vulnerability, study design, recruitment, and international research ethics, as well as ethical issues faced by nurses and other health care providers.” [Bio has been removed…]

https://wikibious.com/anthony-fauci/

MOM

This would have been from the decade between 1969 (?) to 1978 (?)

Mom had breast cancer and they did a radical mastectomy @ Strong Memorial Hospital. It is connected to Rochester University. She was about 50 years of age. The doctor, known to other doctors as ‘The Butcher’, prescribed radiation treatments. Her skin turned black and sloughed and peeled like that of an over-cooked chicken. The hospital gave my parents an OOPS sorry we had the dosage too high. After those treatments she went from a smart bold woman with perfect recall to childlike & timid with trouble remembering.

A few years later she fell and a lump popped out. The Butcher immediately put her on chemo (I think it was in trials). After the crappy job the student did closing her breast cancer surgery, my parents opted to go to the Mayo Clinic to have that lump removed. Mayo Clinic said the cancer in the lump was DEAD but when they heard that The Butcher was giving Mom chemo, they refused to give a second opinion. Mom then started having heart attacks. I had read in Chemical & Engineering News that ‘Chemo therapy affected the heart’ however the Heart doctor CLAIMED to know nothing about chemo and The Butcher CLAIMED to know nothing about the heart. So Mom kept taking the DAMNED POISON. I finally convinced her to stop but she died of a heart attack a couple days later. I am sure The Butcher wrote it up as a success for the chemo therapy.

And yeah I was correct all those years ago:

“Chemotherapy side effects may increase the risk of heart disease, including weakening of the heart muscle (cardiomyopathy) and rhythm disturbances (arrhythmias). Certain types of chemotherapy also may increase the risk of heart attack.”

http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cancer/expert-answers/chemotherapy-side-effects/faq-20058319

BACK TO THE RADIATION:

 U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY
   CONSERVATION AND POWER,
         COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE,
        Washington, DC, October 24, 1986.

The recent acknowledgement by federal officials that the government conducted radiation experiments with human guinea pigs has grabbed the attention of all U.S. citizens, and the reason is that most people assumed that our country would not engage in this kind of activity. I think the fact that the federal government — our government – funded or engaged in this kind of activity is the most disturbing Act of this whole story. Most Americans thought that our country would not take that kind of action…..

A review of these documents reveals the frequent and systematic use of human subjects as guinea pigs for radiation experiments. Some of these experiments were conducted in the 1940’s and 1950’s, and others were performed during the supposedly more enlightened 1960’s and 1970’s. The report describes in detail 31 experiments during which about 695 persons were exposed to radiation which provided little or no medical benefit to the subjects. The report notes that it seems appropriate to urge the Department of Energy to make every practicable effort to identify the persons who served as experimental subjects, to examine the long-term histories of subjects or an increased incidence of radiation associated diseases, and to compensate these unfortunate victims for damages….

These experiments were carried out at the Manhattan District Hospital at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, New York; the University of Chicago; and the University of California. San Francisco….

The overall conclusion from the folders for polonium and uranium injections among the DOE plutonium papers is that these additional experiments were carried out at the University of Rochester by some of the same investigators involved with the plutonium injection experiments. Although staff of the Atomic Energy Commission clearly knew of these additional experiments in 1974, the Commission investigation was truncated with the plutonium injection experiments….

….also the expectation that radioactive material would be administered on for the benefit of a patient. Yet your 1986 report described experiments in the 5Os, 60s, and into the 70s, where subjects received ionizing radiation that provided little or no benefit to the subject. The fact that the later experiments occurred indicates that the 1947 guidance was either violated or overturned in the interim….

experiments,” defined in part as, “experiments on individuals involving intentional exposure to ionizing radiation. This category does not include common and routine clinical practices, such as established diagnosis and treatment methods, involving incidental exposure to ionizing radiation.” (Executive Order, President Clinton, 1/18/94)….

It therefore seems appropriate that as the Interagency Working Group moves forward, some effort should be devoted to determining precisely what standards were in effect in April 1947, and how they deteriorated over time. The matter of what standards were in effect after 1947 and whether they might have been violated is also related to the question of what compensation would be appropriate for experimental subjects.

Considering the history on the lack of informed consent with these experiments….

http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/meet1/brief1/br1n.txt

………………

Getting caught in 1986 did not stop the US Government from using humans as lab rats. Aside from the use of foster kids and orphans as lab rats in AIDS research, we have these experiments by the EPA. AGAIN, Strong Memorial was implicated. Steve

2003 and 2010

The EPA had children down to 10 years, BREATHING DIESEL EXHAUST!

EPA used children to test diesel exhaust 

DOC: https://web.archive.org/web/20150320142837/https://junksciencecom.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/epa-kids-testing-foia-docs.pdf

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-environmental-protection-agency-tested-diesel-fumes-on-children-9998892.html

And that wasn’t the end of it.

Lawsuit: EPA Conducted Gas Chamber-like Experiments on Elderly, Infirm at University of North Carolina
EPA sued in federal court over illegal human testing

There is also this: Dr. Fauci and the NIH’s History in Experimenting on Foster Children and Using Aborted Fetal Tissue to Develop an HIV Vaccine

Vaccines, Fauci, and medical tyranny with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 49 minutes:

LINK: https://rumble.com/vqzb8y-episode-1496-fauci-on-trial.html

I cannot find the original video I saw, but there is a BBC DOCUMENTARY!!! (This is the one I saw.)

BBC documentary that exposes how the city of New York has been forcing HIV-Positive children under its supervision to be used as human guinea pigs in tests for experimental AIDS drug trials.

Transcript for the BBC documentary Guinea Pig Kids

This is a slightly edited version of the complete documentary broadcast on Tuesday, 30 November, 2004, at 1930 GMT on BBC Two in the UK.

……………..

However we are not done yet

REMDESIVIR – FAUCI KNOWINGLY ‘ENROLLED’AMERICANS IN A ‘STUDY’ WITH A TOXIC DRUG DESPITE 2005 STUDY SHOWING CHLOROQUINE WORKED

Updated April 29, 2020, 5:40 PM EDT

By Erika Edwards

An experimental drug for the coronavirus has a proven benefit, according to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

“The data shows that remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery,” Fauci said at the White House on Wednesday. The data he referred to is from a large study of more than 1,000 patients from multiple sites around the world. Patients either received the drug, called remdesivir, or a placebo….”

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/coronavirus-drug-remdesivir-shows-promise-large-trial-n1195171

So Remdesivir was rolled out INSTEAD OF HCQ or chloroquine, KNOWINGLY POISONING PATIENTS.

 
JULY 15, 2021 

 Remdesivir offers no clinical benefit for COVID-19, extends hospital stay for many

Most recently, a study led by the World Health Organization found that the drug failed to improve outcomes in patients hospitalized with the virus.

Because of these and other study results, the WHO recommended against its use in COVID-19 patients in November.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, however, already had approved remdesivir for use in people hospitalized due to severe COVID-19 only a month earlier. Former President Donald Trump, who had COVID-19 in October, is one of the U.S. patients who has been treated with the drug.  https://www.upi.com/Health_News/2021/07/15/coronavirus-remdesivir-study/8251626356176/

DEPOPULATION BY ANY MEANS DR. BRYAN ARDIS, DR. REINER FUELLMICH AND DR. WOLFGANG WODARG

LINK: https://rumble.com/vm0009-depopulation-by-any-means-dr.-bryan-ardis-dr.-reiner-fuellmich-and-dr.-wolf.html

(I think this is the same as in this site below.)

@ 8:00 (2018) Ebola trial of four drugs tested Remdesivir safety board found it had THE HIGHEST DEATH RATE and PULLED it before the end of the one year study. Fauci’s SECOND DRUG was the SECOND MOST DEADLY…. Goes into second test.

Listen from 8:20 onwards on how Remdesivir was effectively chosen by Fauci himself for it’s sheer lethality to be given to COVID patients. Fauci stated that all hospitals in America were only to give Remdesivir to COVID patients and nothing else, and also criminally ordered that Hydroxychloroquine was not to be used to treat COVID as Fauci dishonestly stated it is very dangerous for COVID patients.
Fauci knew 2 years before he mandated Remdesivir as the only drug to be used how deadly it’s effects would certainly be, this being clear evidence that he deliberately mass-murdered all those American people who died allegedly from COVID whose symptoms were actually those of fatal Remdesivir poisoning.

….For the first 10 months in 2020, America was the only country using Remdesivir as the drug to treat COVID and bought up all the stocks it could from all over the world to be able to do that, and as a direct result, America had the most deaths, allegedly from COVID, in reality from Remdesivir poisoning (and having their lungs popped on ventilators).

Remdesivir is very expensive indeed in comparison with Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine.

Remdesivir was found in one study of 4 drugs looking for a potential treatment for Ebola to have the most lethal side-effects.

In a second study by the Israeli company Gilead, 22% out of 53 COVID patients in 23 countries who were given Remdesivir were found after just 28 days to have suffered 4 major effects, multiple organ failure, acute kidney failure, septic shock and hypotension. 8% of these patients had to be taken off Remdesivir by day 5 or 10 because they were dying. 30% experienced 4 life-threatening effects.

Doctors in American hospitals who had been ordered to use Remdesivir on COVID patients were mistaking effects of Remdesivir for those of COVID, thinking COVID was causing the kidney failure now being seen in their patients. These patients were not dying from any COVID, they were dying very clearly from Remdesivir poisoning….

[WARNING: It gets antisemitic from that point on]

https://mothman777.wordpress.com/2021/08/04/dr-bryan-ardis-holocaust-by-remdesivir-we-are-now-witnessing-the-intentional-medical-genocide-of-humanity-watch-comment/

MORE:

…However, methotrexate achieved only short-term ALL remission, until combination chemotherapy was attempted in 1970. [That would be the trial Mom was in. The timing is exactly right.]

Roy Hertz, M.D., began his career at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) studying the effect of folic acid on the female urogenital tract, the organ system of the reproductive organs and the urinary system. In 1946, Dr. Hertz became chair of the Endocrinology Section at the National Cancer Institute (NCI)….

Alan Rabson, M.D., Deputy Director of NCI, described Dr. Hertz as having had “a major impact on cancer therapy. Showing that it wasn’t only leukemia that was curable with chemotherapy was a pivotal step. It opened up the rest of the field.” In 1972, Drs. Hertz and Li were awarded the prestigious Lasker Award—often considered to be the “American Nobel prize”— for their groundbreaking work.

With the first significant success against solid cancer tumors, the medical field was turned on its head. Previous assumptions that cancer was nearly always fatal were revised, and the field of medical oncology (treatment of cancer with chemotherapy), which had not previously existed, was formally established in 1971…..

The 1960s and 1970s brought significant advances in chemotherapy as researchers addressed the ongoing challenges of cancer treatment. The Clinical Center at NIH was central to many of the early breakthroughs in chemotherapy….

https://www.cancer.gov/research/progress/discovery/methotrexate


Wolf again.

I want to thank Aubergine and Gail Combs for so quickly putting something together.

It is my hope that other Truth Seekers and Patriots will investigate this matter more deeply, and see if, in fact, these mass graves for 24 years are in fact connected to US government research.

Sincerely,

W

Dear KMAG: 20220103 Joe Biden Didn’t Win ❀ Open Topic / Benadryl Could Have Saved Grandma / The Gatesification of Science

Joe Biden didn’t win. This is our Real President:

AND our wonderful REALFLOTUS.

Hopefully, this great couple is getting some REST, because they may NEED IT.

I am telling y’all – the Trumps may very well be on their way back to the White House in 1-3 years.

In fact, the way Obammunism has been “performing” – stumbling in disarray behind the HUMAN SHIELD Joe Biden, it looks like even the core plotters are having regrets and doubts now.

Mark “Drop Box Treason” Zuckerberg isn’t buying up land for his giant hideaway in Hawaii – only a SUBMARINE RIDE AWAY FROM CHINA – for no reason. He knows that there is a limited future for this insane, incompetent, incorrigible, and unelected OBOLA-BIDUNG regime, that he helped force upon ALL OF US.

SPIT!!!


The Business At Hand

This Stormwatch Monday Open Thread remains open – VERY OPEN – a place for everybody to post whatever they feel they would like to tell the White Hats, and the rest of the MAGA/KAG/KMAG world (with KMAG being a bit of both).

And indeed, it’s Monday…again.

But we WILL get through it, TOGETHER.


The Rules

Boilerplate, more or less, but worth reading again and again, if only for the minor changes, and to stay out of moderation.

The bottom line is Free Speech. Theories and ideas you don’t agree with must be WELCOME here, and you must be part of that welcoming. But you do NOT need to be part of any agreement.

FOR EXAMPLE:

WE, the LINTARDS, the FLYNNTARDS, and the WeAin’tNeverGonnaWinTards are all welcome here, as long as we’re NICE ABOUT IT. The mutually odious viewpoints of disagreeing patriots are ALL welcome – those views just have to be expressed nicely, without accusing each other of being this, that, or the other.

Disagree with the material, not the character of the presenter.

Remember – Everybody is somebody else’s Ace Ventura.

As an alternative to character assassination, allow THE HOUSE to suggest better and more compelling material than the other person.

We must endeavor to persevere to love our frenemies – even here.

Those who cannot deal with this easy requirement will be forced to jump the hoops of moderation, so that specific comments impugning other posters and violating the minimal rules can be sorted out and tossed in the trash.

In Wheatie’s words, “We’re on the same side here so let’s not engage in friendly fire.”

We do have a site – The U Tree – where civility is not a requirement. Interestingly, people don’t really go there much. Nevertheless, if you find yourself in an “argument” that can’t really stay civil, please feel free to “take it to the U Tree”. The U Tree is also a good place to report any technical difficulties, if you’re unable to report them here. Please post your comment there on one of Wolf’s posts, or in reply to one of Wolf’s comments, to make sure he sees it (though it may take a few hours).

We also have a backup site, called The Q Tree as well, which is really The Q Tree 579486807. You might call it “Second Tree”. The URL for that site is https://theqtree579486807.wordpress.com/. If this site (theqtree.com) ever goes down, please reassemble at the Second Tree.

If the Second Tree goes down, please go to The U Tree, or to our Gab Group, which is located at https://gab.com/groups/4178.

We also have some “old rules” and important guidelines, outlined here, in a very early post, on our first New Year’s Day, in 2019. The main point is not to make violent threats against people, which then have to be taken seriously by law enforcement, and which can be used as a PRETEXT by enemies of this site.

In the words of Wheatie, “Let’s not give the odious Internet Censors a reason to shut down this precious haven that Wolf has created for us.”


A Moment of Prayer

Our policy on extreme religious freedom on this site is discussed HERE. Please feel free to pray and praise God anytime and anywhere.

Thus, please pray for our real President, the one who actually won the election.

You may also pray for our enemies, the Crazy Mask-Wearing Democrats. Note that Benadryl and some of the other antihistamines that can save their lives from COVID cooties, also act as antipsychotics.

We’ll get to more about THAT in a moment.


MUSICAL INTERLUDE

For your listening enjoyment, and general encouragement, we continue Wheatie’s tradition of fine music videos, shipped fresh from the seas of information by our intrepid authors.

Today’s gonna be a real grab-bag. Don’t click on what you may not like.

THE SCROLLBAR OR MOUSE WHEEL COULD BE YOUR FRIEND.


This one is a bit too “heavy metal” for many of us, but it brings to my mind some of the questions of TRANSHUMANISM.

Food for thought.


OK – maybe we should balance that out with a little country, like last week? Maybe a bit “old pop country” – whatever! Enjoy this flash-in-the-pan country duo act, who look far too much like something from the Monica Lewinsky era.


Well, we can’t have Country without “Western”!

So how about something very familiar, but maybe you never really thought about how WEIRD it is that it actually IS familiar………?


OK – this is really straying pretty far afield from WHEATIE MUSIC.

So how about a little more of THAT? In fact, how about 90 minutes of it?


Alright! THAT was sufficient preparation for MORE WEIRDNESS.

I used to love this song. Kinda glad the styles changed since then, however.


So how about some Vitamin B – as in BOLLYWOOD?

This stuff is surprisingly listenable.

https://youtu.be/9XJkQ2tnbO8

You know what? Let’s COOL IT ON DOWN with some CHURCH ORGAN, CITY STYLE……


And finally, let us CLOSE with an OPENING HYMN!

There you go. Around the world in 8 music videos.


Call To Battle

Our beloved country is under Occupation by hostile forces.

Daily outrage and epic phuckery abound.

CAN AH GIT AN EYE-ROLL???

We can give in to despair…or we can be defiant and fight back in any way that we can.

Joe Biden didn’t win.

And we will keep saying Joe Biden didn’t win until we get His Fraudulency out of our White House.


Featured Story – Benadryl Could Have Saved Grandma / The Gatesification of Science

Dr. Peter McCullough, in the first 6 minutes of his amazing interview with Joe Rogan…….

…..describes exactly what SHOULD have been done in the fight against COVID-19.

FIND THERAPEUTICS AND TREATMENTS
WITH SIGNALS OF BENEFIT
AND ACCEPTABLE SAFETY

AND START USING THEM

This is such a ridiculously simple idea, it should go without saying.

AND YET…..

The GATESIFICATION OF SCIENCE…..

…..OH, NO – DO NOT DENY IT…..

…..created an ANTI-MEDICAL DELUSION in both medicine and media…..

That we cannot, should not, and will not use LINUX DRUGS…..

…..until the “Windows” vaccines are ready for YOU to buy (with your taxes) and take them.


DEAR KAG: 20211224 – Christmas Eve – The Pub is OPEN / How Bill Gates Took Down Hydroxychloroquine

The Pub is OPEN again! With a blend of humor and seriousness, like any good bar, we celebrate this grand re-opening of WOLF’S PUB on Christmas Eve, December 24, 2021, by actually opening near closing time on Christmas Eve Eve, but what the heck. IT’S ALMOST CHRISTMAS. While our beloved bartender takes a needed break …


ARE YOU SEEING IT YET?

We will keep working on it until you do.

Today’s message is how BENADRYL provides ONE MORE EXAMPLE of a drug that showed a strong signal of benefit AND acceptable safety AND – shockingly – was very likely in the medicine cabinets of hundreds of thousands of people who died of COVID-19 NEEDLESSLY – simply because American medicine has been taken over at the top by the pharmaceutical industry and their financial backers.

They had to show us.

And they did.

If you are not familiar with my…..

  • finding of
  • explanation of
  • personal use of
  • support for
  • and
  • promotion of

…..the use of ANTIHISTAMINES as a simple, reliable, proven, and readily available “cure”, if you will, for “death by COVID”, then let me give you a quick list of my previous commentary and REFERENCES to this wonderful FACT.


The Zyrtec Rebellion

Everybody underestimates Spain. The last letter in “PIGS” is far less of an insult than an error. Years ago, when I was at a conference, and Japanese industrial spies were getting me drunk (it was a great red wine), I decided that I had to give them SOMETHING for their time and effort, if only …


The Clot Shot, The Explanation Thereof, And The Faucist-Lysenkoist CDC That Pretends Not To Understand

I. The Clot Shot First things first. Nobody would be calling ALL of the various full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein vaccines “the clot shot” if there weren’t some clear and obvious problems with the full-length stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit spike protein ITSELF. We already know that clotting dysfunction is key to COVID-19 pathogenicity. …


Ivermectin – The Preparation

OK, people. It is time for THE WOLF to GET PATTON ON YOUR ASSES. As you may know, we now have many of our dear members actively fighting COVID-19, including one (gil00) in the hospital. Several have received Regeneron. Thus far, praise God, we have not lost anybody – and I intend to keep it …


Delta Wolf

After a lost week of human self-experimentation to survive multiply mutated Fauci-Baric China Virus, Wolf has obtained answers to a thousand questions. Here are just a few of those answers. Over the last week, overcoming my SECOND case of the China virus, I have been able to learn quite a bit about the enemy’s weaponry …


Five Fast Omicron Facts You Can Send to Your Friends, Neighbors and Doctors (see number 4)

This is a quick update that is almost entirely GOOD NEWS, and that needs to SPREAD AROUND LIKE WILDFIRE – just like OMICRON. I will try to be brief and only comment as needed. 1 – A Case of Omicron Treated With HCQ Remember that case of COVID treated with ivermectin, that was published as …


DEAR KAG: 20211231 – … How to Hide a Histaminimus …

The Pub is OPEN! Of course we’re open on New Year’s Eve, for goodness sake! However, the crooked and despicable Clot Shot Casino is now CLOSED (more details later), for outrageous offenses like THIS. Colorado casino customers prosecuted for playing abandoned slot credits Prepare to be outraged, even though this story is from over 5 …


If you follow through these SIX posts, you will see the progression of my thinking.

  • recognition of cheap, common antihistamine therapy as lifesaving at nearly 100% levels
  • dawning of realization that NIH, CDC, and big pharma were not truly looking out for patients
  • realization that individuals needed to be ready to save themselves and their friends, family, neighbors and loved ones with various therapeutics
  • what I learned by treating my own confirmed case of delta with selected therapeutics
  • confirmation of the generality and stage 2 mechanism of H1 antihistamine therapy
  • how antihistamine therapy was hidden by the media as compared to HCQ and ivermectin, on behalf of the larger plot to control humanity

Indeed, I now see the suppression of knowledge of the most readily available, inexpensive, extremely safe COVID therapeutics, as one of the greatest, saddest, and most horrifying instances of GASLIGHTING in history – not merely the history of science.

Humans on this planet were HYPNOTIZED into NOT USING the two most obvious drugs in their medicine cabinets – aspirin and antihistamines – which could have saved them from a new and sometimes deadly “cold”.

Ironic, isn’t it? The media tried to talk us us out of aspirin just before it would have saved millions of people from both the “clot disease” and even the “clot shot”.

Funny, that. But it gets worse.

My doctors and their nurses distinctly and repeatedly tried to steer me to acetaminophen (Tylenol) for COVID, despite the fact that there was, at that time, ESTABLISHED, PUBLISHED, SOLID, PEER-REVIEWED LITERATURE showing that low-dose aspirin reduces hospitalization and death from COVID-19 by around half. And the reason is obvious to anybody with a wisp of scientific understanding – even at high-school levels. Aspirin is a blood thinner and anticoagulant, and the bad effects of the disease (and the shots) are thrombotic. Simple.

If there was ever a time to take aspirin, it was for COVID. The suppressed FLCCC.net treatment recommends it. Why not the AMA?

Can’t they read the damn signal?

Can’t they understand relative risk and benefit?

Like I said, VACCINE HYPNOSIS.

Peter McCullough talks about this phenomenon of vaccine hypnosis in the scientific and medical communities, in his great interview with Joe Rogan, above. I think he uses a different term for it, but we’re talking about the same thing.

The hypnotic blindness toward active use of therapeutics was bad for HCQ and ivermectin, but it was even worse for antihistamines, because the deception got past even the most active members of the “therapeutic” community – MYSELF INCLUDED.

I was a HUGE backer of [HCQ + disease-conferred immunity] as the best therapeutic path forward, from the very beginning. I later began appreciating ivermectin, too, as the data rolled in.

Enjoy one of my memes inspired by Cari Kelemen on Twitter, with her great quote at the bottom.

The problem is, at the deepest part of the conspiracy, we were GASLIT into focusing on chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, and not gaining social momentum toward more readily available drugs (aspirin and common antihistamines) that could have REALLY changed the game – but which would have VERY RAPIDLY moved the global outcome away from the pointless, problematic, Gates-controlled vaccines.

Once you understand that we were CHUMPS who were CONNED away from antihistamines, you understand how smart these people REALLY are.

They’re tricky – SO tricky.

Hydroxychloroquine, and then ivermectin, WERE part of the gaslighting. We loved them, and still do, but don’t kid yourself. They are GOOD, SAFE, EFFECTIVE drugs. But BOTH are prescription drugs. They require doctors, and this brilliant chess move distracted the few honest doctors, looking for therapeutics, by a hidden, unconscious, alignment with “what they could do to help”.

THE PERFECT BAIT – for the “please help” scam.

It’s like putting a firehose in front of a fireman when there is a fire, and seconds to stop it. The fireman may not know that down under all that burning wood is a fire that would go out faster and better with something other than water, but they do the right thing, and go for the first and most obvious solution that appears, consistent with their own abilities.

We don’t like to think that we were suckered by a SECOND LAYER OF THE SCAM, but we were.

I was actually suckered by such a scam, years ago, in assisting the deceitful implementation of the current highly broken version of affirmative action in universities. It’s an interesting story, but I’ll save it for another time.

The point is, the best way to CON people is to GET THEM TO BUY IN ENTHUSIASTICALLY.

People usually don’t catch these masterful crimes until the crooks are long gone and got what they wanted. It’s infuriating, but the multi-layer “please help” scam is effective as – well – HELL.

Hollywood, of course, is quite familiar with such “plots”.

BUT ANYWAY…..

Let’s get down to business.

Up until now, the two, large-scale, clinically proven sets of antihistamines for COVID-19 have been the newest (cetirizine, loratadine, and fexofenadine) and one of the oldest (promethazine), but not one of the most obvious possibilities – diphenhydramine, otherwise known as Benadryl.

Well, it turns out that Benadryl has been showing ENORMOUS promise in the laboratory.

LINK: https://www.wnd.com/2021/12/scientist-surprised-discovery-99-effective-cheap-covid-treatment/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/cwoPU


Now this particular researcher has been looking at a synergistic combination of diphenhydramine (Benadryl) with human lactoferrin, which achieves STUNNING results, in terms of ANTIVIRAL activity, albeit in vitro.

To quote the article:

The scientist who combined two widely available over-the-counter compounds that inhibited the novel coronavirus by 99% in early tests told WND he’s hopeful his treatment will be available “within months.”

“An FDA-approved treatment could be in sight within months if pharmaceutical companies utilize existing clinical trial resources,” said Dr. David Ostrov in an email interview with WND.

Let’s just quote that again for effect:

“An FDA-approved treatment could be in sight within months if pharmaceutical companies utilize existing clinical trial resources,” said Dr. David Ostrov in an email interview with WND.

To which the only proper response is…..

But wait – there’s moar!

Sadly, I’m sorry, but anybody who is still embedded in Fake Science and Fake Medicine needs to understand what I figured out while I was in the belly of the beast.

The people at the top, in Washington, DC, are no longer there to help the people.

They are there to help themselves.

Solutions are controlled by RETURN ON INVESTMENT – not by saved lives – THAT is secondary.

Which is too bad, because antihistamines are a solid cure against DEATH, per the Spanish study, and have a robust mechanism in both Stage 1 AND Stage 2 of COVID, with Ostrov’s work proving actual Stage 1 antiviral activity.

Please read the following comments by the scientist, Dr. David Ostrov, behind the study.

The story started before SARS, when my lab was studying drugs that bind ACE2, the molecule that turned out to be the receptor for SARS and SARS-CoV-2.

We previously found that an antihistamine (hydroxyzine) bound ACE2, and in 2020 were able to test the ability of this drug to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in the lab. It was an “aha” moment when the data clearly showed that a common antihistamine inhibited the virus that causes COVID. Different scientists at the University of Florida College of Medicine used different isolates of SARS-CoV-2, and the results agreed with each other. An antihistamine can inhibit the virus!

We then realized that there may be similar drugs that could inhibit the virus, perhaps even over-the-counter drugs. But which drugs?

We collaborated with investigators and UCSF where they examined the medical records for more than 219,000 people tested for SARS-CoV-2. They found that usage of diphenhydramine was associated with a lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2. In other words, in this population, people were less likely to be infected with COVID if they used diphenhydramine.

Why would taking an allergy pill lead to lower risk of COVID? There could be many reasons, but is it possible that a simple allergy pill can directly inhibit the virus that causes COVID?

We did the experiments at the University of Florida College of Medicine, and the data was published in a peer reviewed journal. Diphenhydramine exhibits direct antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2. Diphenhydramine inhibits virus replication, inhibits virus shedding and inhibits host cell killing.

This is all wonderful news, but it NEVER penetrated the “vaccine hypnosis”, and here is why. Again, a quote from the investigator, Dr. Ostrov.

My prediction is that antiviral drug combinations, such as diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, will provide a similar level of benefit as Regeneron monoclonal antibodies, Pfizer and Merck antivirals, at less than 1/100 the cost of those therapies.

There you go. Right there. “Less than one one-hundredth the cost” is NOT what these companies, bureaucrats, and politicians want to hear. They may nod and say “wonderful”, but if it does not cause as much “other people’s money” to move as the vaccines, then nobody will champion it.

However, that does NOT mean that WE THE LAB RATS can’t use the knowledge to save ourselves.

Ostrov is not stupid, and he gives up some crucial data while preserving his scientific credibility.

AND I QUOTE:

Ostrov told WND he’s been in communication with people who wonder if their use of the compounds has helped prevent them from getting COVID-19.

He noted that “anecdotal stories are certainly not proof of efficacy,” but many people have contacted him about diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, and their results “are difficult to ignore.”

“For many people, they say everyone around them got COVID, but not them,” Ostrov said.

And they ask the professor if diphenhydramine and/or lactoferrin.

“Without placebo controlled clinical trials, we will not have a definitive answer,” he said. “The answer for now, though, is maybe.”

Ostrov mentioned a contact who takes a daily dose of Benadryl and regularly drinks milk. She said she had been in close contact for hours with someone who was hospitalized the next day for COVID-19. But after waiting five days from the time of exposure, she tested negative for COVID.

He cautioned that people “considering their own concoction should understand that our experiments were carried out with human lactoferrin, not cow.” And the lactoferrin he used was purified in a special way to enhance its antiviral properties and is not likely to be found on the shelf.

People should consult with their physician, Ostrov said, before taking any drug for a use other than its intended use.

“Even though historically there are relatively few adverse events reported for diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, it should be noted that long term use of any medication, or combination of medications, could have unexpected consequences,” he said.

Ostrov said he hopes that once FDA-approved, “people may benefit from this antiviral drug combination for two-to-three month intervals during each wave of COVID infections.”

Notice that while Ostrov VERY HELPFULLY admits there is some real life usage of the drugs going on, and some success, he also downplays the admission to a politically correct level, using excuses that are completely mitigating against accusations of “recommendation”. The man is not stupid. He’s getting the word out, while staying in the lanes that Fake Science demands he stay in.

BUT – and this should be very clear – it’s obvious that people CAN and WILL make use of this cure – particularly the Benadryl. Thus, Ostrov makes a nicely balanced warning about long-term use of Benadryl, which is known to be potentially problematic, but also probably not an issue for most people who are treating or occasionally/periodically preventing COVID-19.

And, of course, there are many other antihistamines which are KNOWN TO BE SAFE for long-term usage, which are (IMO, based on the Spanish work) acceptable substitutes for Benadryl.

Let me add some other links on Benadryl that people may find useful.

Here is an earlier article on Ostrov’s work:

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-12-antihistamine-drugs-effectiveness-covid-virus.html

One of the things to notice here is that this article was published over a year ago (December 2020), describing work that occurred over years before that, but that then ramped up under COVID during 2020.

In that ENTIRE TIME, at the same time Ostrov was doing foundational research, the clinical efficacy of THREE antihistamines was discovered, tested, demonstrated in a group of people, and published (March to September 2020) by the nursing home doctors in Spain. AND, during that time Dr. Chetty in South Africa demonstrated the clinical utility of promethazine in thousands of patients.

In a sane world, as soon as the Spanish results were RECEIVED for publication (September 2020), there should have been immediate emergency pre-publication for the benefit of clinicians. Instead, the paper was basically held until January 2021, when the vaccines were safely in production.

The SYSTEM is not designed to save lives in anything near an optimal fashion. It is designed to make money as a primary motivation, and – perhaps – THE primary motivation.

So why has Ostrov’s work apparently advanced no further toward treating people IN PRACTICE?

Because NOBODY in government or industry wants it. And they have OUR MONEY invested elsewhere.

Of course, that doesn’t mean there isn’t GREAT research going on. Just look at this confirmation of Dr. Chetty’s contention that antihistamines are useful in the treatment of “long COVID”.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210608/Antihistamines-might-be-effective-in-long-COVID.aspx

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.06.21258272v1

And HERE is a real treat that most people missed.


‘My Super-Antibodies Can Defeat Any COVID Variant’

JOHN HOLLIS
ON 3/15/21 AT 5:05 PM EDT

https://www.newsweek.com/super-antibodies-covid-variant-1576311


“Well, I wouldn’t be so sure they do it alone, dude.”

Here is a guy – a recoveree – whose blood was found to be very lethal against SARS-CoV-2 – far more than most people’s blood.

Interestingly, the guy is something of a Benadryl addict due to allergies, and he took it during COVID.

Whether he took Benadryl prior to sample collection in July 2020 is unknown, but Benadryl is metabolized in the liver, otherwise by excretion to a lesser extent, so it’s possible that serum Benadryl could have enhanced the ability of any antibodies, by blocking ACE2 receptors while antibodies then bound to viral spike protein – a rather nifty tag-team effect.

You will see that this story is filled with coincidences – for example, the writer is the director of communications at the university that was running the study, and already knew the head of the study. He then volunteered to be tested, directly to that person, while doing a story.

And you know what I think of “their” journalists. LOW-GRADE SPIES AND PROVOCATEURS.

I don’t want to speak for Sadie, but if she throws a “Suspicious Cat at this story, I’m ready to throw FOUR of them.

AND I QUOTE:

I didn’t know it at the time, but my unlikely story had begun after becoming heavily congested to start the last week of March 2020. I had NO other symptoms whatsoever besides repeatedly having to blow my nose. Pollen was everywhere that time of year as per usual, so I just naturally attributed my sudden nasal issues to that. I loaded up on Benadryl and was feeling 100 percent again by week’s end four days later. There was never as much as a single thought that I had contracted COVID-19.

John Hollis

So the writer had COVID during the last week of March 2020, loaded up on Benadryl, finished out a very typical “good” case in 4 days, and very likely continued taking Benadryl, at least on occasion, for allergies.

AND I QUOTE AGAIN:

The George Mason antibody study, which began in April, was unique in that it was a saliva-based test rather a blood-based one and would eventually be used to screen students, faculty and staff. Mason was among the nation’s first universities to take this approach in the fight against the spread of the virus and maintains one of the only 13 National Institutes of Health-sponsored Biosafety Level 3 Biomedical Research Laboratories equipped to handle live COVID-19 samples from which Dr. Liotta and his team could quickly test.

Now jump to mid-July 2020.

As George Mason University’s Communications Manager, I had received word in mid-July that the scientists had come across some positive initial results.

I soon met with Dr. Liotta at his office on George Mason’s Science and Technology Campus in Manassas, Virginia to discuss their findings. I’ve known him for a few years now after having previously worked with him on other projects, so we’ve had a good relationship for a while. I was about to leave his office when I casually mentioned to Dr. Liotta that the guy I lived with had become terribly sick with the virus in early April. I had been so certain at that time that a similar fate or worse also awaited me that I even penned a letter to my teenage son just in case. I considered myself incredibly lucky to have gone unscathed.

This is when he volunteered for the test.

Or so I believed at the time.

So I figured there was no harm in asking if I could join the several hundred volunteers who had already participated in the study. Dr. Liotta agreed and I returned a few days later to give blood and saliva samples as a late addition to the research. The whole process took maybe 30 minutes.

This is how the story wraps up.

I was still of the belief that I had somehow dodged the bullet back in April and never even considered that I might have already contracted the virus, let alone that it may have been I who passed it on to my housemate. I had no reason to anticipate anything whatsoever coming of my lab results.

But after further careful analysis of my blood, Dr. Liotta and his team soon confirmed that I had contracted an American strain of the virus while also explaining to me exactly how and where the “super” antibodies had attacked and entirely eradicated the virus from my body. My blood has since proven equally as effective in killing every different strain of COVID-19, including the latest highly transmissible variants from both the U.K. and South Africa. I can’t even be a carrier for the virus.

I’ve been told this is somewhat akin to the medical equivalent of finding the Holy Grail.

I was one of eight people who participated in the study found to have “super” antibodies, with each person showing varying levels of natural protection from the virus. In addition to its ability to so effectively neutralize COVID-19, my blood is unique because the “super” antibodies in it have remained highly concentrated nearly a year after my infection. Most people’s antibodies typically wane significantly after 60 to 90 days.

How and why my body does this remains the million dollar question, but it means that I and others like me are best-suited to possibly help scientists mass reproduce antibodies like mine in the hopes of creating a treatment for COVID-19 and a lasting and far more effective vaccine.

It’s been sobering to think that my blood and that of others like me could potentially save thousands of lives or perhaps more.

So then imagine the irony of my having been randomly selected seven times for COVID testing between late September 2020 and March 2021. Each of the occasions—all with negative results—were part of George Mason University’s comprehensive Safe Return to Campus plan. It’s made for some good laughs and I’ve never once minded the very slight inconvenience. It’s like taking a test when you’ve been given all the answers in advance.

I’ve been very fortunate and feel blessed beyond measure.

Notice the TWO KICKERS which are to me indicative of a non-protein, small-molecule therapeutic in his plasma, with a longer half-life than more denaturable and strain-specific antibodies.

My blood has since proven equally as effective in killing every different strain of COVID-19, including the latest highly transmissible variants from both the U.K. and South Africa. I can’t even be a carrier for the virus.

I was one of eight people who participated in the study found to have “super” antibodies, with each person showing varying levels of natural protection from the virus. In addition to its ability to so effectively neutralize COVID-19, my blood is unique because the “super” antibodies in it have remained highly concentrated nearly a year after my infection. Most people’s antibodies typically wane significantly after 60 to 90 days.

SO – honestly – I think it would be very interesting to discover exactly how much Benadryl was in his blood samples when he took tests, and which may still be in those samples.

Why, this story could get even more interesting.

Are they toying with us?

I don’t know. Toying is a way of testing, is it not?

I can certainly think of the propaganda value of converting the strength of the “enemy position” – the “evolutionary solution” (therapeutics like Benadryl) into a story about antibodies (the “revolutionary solution”) – which supports both new vaccines and new, expensive, antibody therapies.

(See my prior discussion of Faucism as modern Lysenkoism for that to make sense.)

Anybody seeing how that works? It’s very Marxist, actually.

Is there some Gramsci in Fauci? Maybe nearby? Interesting times.


BACK TO ETHICAL QUESTIONS

The ever-vulgar, ever-right Karl Denninger CLUED ME IN, by virtue of a rather ranty rant, to a post by one of the best voices in the world of SCIENCE and REASON – a guy named The Ethical Skeptic.

LINK: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/12/30/denial-of-early-covid-19-treatment-a-crime-against-humanity/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/hemSW

TES, as he is known, is framing the “go home and take Tylenol and die or don’t die from COVID” therapy that most of us got, as a kind of INVOLUNTARY CONTROL EXPERIMENT – including DENIAL OF TREATMENT – without our informed consent.

I think his approach is VERY powerful.

AND I QUOTE:

In other words, I was allowed to choose whether I would be a member of
the ‘no treatment allowed’ control group or alternately one of the vaccine test groups;
however, through denying me timely treatment,
I was not offered the ethical choice of not participating in the experiment altogether.

Neither was I informed as to the nature of this experiment, nor was I made aware that other treatments or therapies were at my avail, should I decline participation. I was fraudulently coerced by a medical professional (and by advising health officials) into the belief that I had no choice, I had to participate. My life was endangered and I was exposed to unnecessary amounts of suffering and expense as a result of this coerced experiment. I was not offered the remedies or recourse to address the situation in the instance where the experiment failed (it did fail) or failed to ensure my safety, nor was I given the opportunity to bring the experiment to an end.


What this really shows us is how BADLY medicine has been overrun by both corporate and government interests, which are now allied against medical freedom, and even against truth itself in science and medicine.

Back to McCullough.

SIGNALS OF BENEFIT and ACCEPTABLE SAFETY.

Not what we’re seeing with the limited choices being offered by establishment medicine and government, and which are clearly being LIED about by the narrative enforcers of social media.

The fact that Anthony Fauci and Gilead Pharmaceuticals would promote a drug (remdesivir) that had – AT BEST – no better signals of benefit than hydroxychloroquine – BUT that had FAR WORSE SAFETY – and that also had – admittedly – a higher profit margin……

Well, that pretty much tells you all you need to know about “ethics” in “Deep Science”.

And remember – Anthony Fauci’s WIFE is some kind of “ethics czarina” at NIH. A VERY interesting family, including a daughter at Twitter.

LINK: https://www.the-sun.com/news/1796332/who-is-dr-fauci-wife-christine-grady/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/yCgv7

How cozy.

Again, a bibliography of back-up on the corruption surrounding remdesivir.


Remdesivir Is How We Bring Down The Temple of Faucism

I have been a poor and rotten servant of the Lord during my too long and too miserable life. I have made innocent women cry. I have led others astray. I have turned away from those in need in their time of need, and I have lied to myself and to God about why I …


The Murder of Veronica Wolski by Fauci and Gilead’s Zyklon D

There will be justice for Veronica Wolski, because we will DEMAND IT. And until there IS justice, we will drag the CRIMES of Anthony Fauci and Gilead “Pharmaceuticals” and their SLEAZY ASSOCIATES thorough the headlines, over and over, until people SPIT IN THEIR PATH as they walk down the streets. So where do we begin? …


NIH and Gilead Blamecasting Remdesivir Renal Toxicity to an Excipient

Well, they can lock us out of The Q Tree, but they can’t stop the truth from getting out. Enjoy a post first over on The U Tree and now HERE. Here is a quickie in my WAR ON REMDESIVIR. Fellow Treeper barkerjim dropped an interesting document today, from back in July, which showed the …


OAN Hosts Amazing Anonymous Documentary on Discovery and Suppression of Ivermectin for COVID, and How Gilead and Fauci Gamed a Remdesivir Study

My dear wife is the one who found this, so let me start off by thanking her. After working outside Tuesday night, I came in the front door, and my wife IMMEDIATELY told me to start watching what was on OAN. It was an anonymous Rumble video about ivermectin and remdesivir that OAN re-bannered and …


The point is simple.

Benadryl is EVEN SAFER than hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, by many standards, seeing that it is considered safe for OTC, and those other drugs are not.

Benadryl meets the McCullough CriteriaSignals of Benefit and Acceptable Safety.

And Benadryl is already out there – ready to help people get through COVID.

We also have other, more modern antihistamines – PROVEN to save lives from COVID-19, in the Spanish study.

In my opinion, antihistamine therapy is the baseline outpatient therapy that should have been mass-introduced globally, to practically eliminate death from COVID.

But DEEP SCIENCE had other ideas.

Just as I believe there was a conspiracy of interest against hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, I believe there was an even deeper conspiracy against the more readily available antihistamines.

And I believe that unless people answer for these crimes, there will be more like them in the future.


Wolfie’s Wheatie’s Word of the Day:

eleutherophobia

noun

fear of freedom

From Ancient Greek ἐλευθερία (eleuthería, “freedom”) +‎ -phobia.

el-ūth-er-o-fō′bi-a, el-ūth-er-o-mā′ni-a, etc.

Used in a sentence:

The eleutherophobia of many rank-and-file Democrats is a useful tool of the miseleutheric Democrat / Communist leadership. The eleutherophilia if not eleutheromania of the true patriot is rarely found among Democrats these days, thanks to socialist infiltration and control of the party.

Used in a video:

This guy is a bit of a trip – not exactly our style of patriot, but he belongs to an interesting bunch.

They could use a bit more Biblical wisdom, IMO, and perhaps a bit less “woo”, but at least they’re not eleutherophobes.

Ἐλευθερία ἢ Θάνατος. (“Freedom or Death.”)


ENJOY THE SHOW

Have a great week, people – and a very FREE 2022.

W

DEAR KAG: 20211231 – New Year’s Eve – The Pub is OPEN / The Clot Shot Casino is CLOSED / Christmas Spirit / Trump Calendars / How to Hide a Histaminimus / Nick Perry, Percy Sutton, and Obola / Minion Meets Master / General Flynn on Exposing TRUTH

The Pub is OPEN!

Of course we’re open on New Year’s Eve, for goodness sake!

However, the crooked and despicable Clot Shot Casino is now CLOSED (more details later), for outrageous offenses like THIS.

Colorado casino customers prosecuted for playing abandoned slot credits

Prepare to be outraged, even though this story is from over 5 years ago.

A guy who found $2 in credit left on a slot machine, played it before he put his own money into “his” machine, and was PROSECUTED for “fraud” with a big fine. Yup. Any credits left on a machine belong to the house, if a person leaves them. The house then MONITORS this crap on security camera.

So they don’t let the guy pay the $2, but shake him down with arrest, booking, charges, and ultimately a PLEA BARGAIN and a CRIMINAL RECORD. Everybody in the FAKE LEGAL SYSTEM gets rich except the CHUMP, who should have taken it to court, even though there was probably a dirty judge on it, too.

Clearly the whole thing is a SCAM set up with dirty law enforcement. In fact, it would not surprise me if CHUMPS were being set up by the casino (intentionally left machine credits) to take these falls.

Meanwhile, FBI goes after patriotic Americans.

Gambling. It’s just DIRTY. That’s why you won’t find CLOTTERY TICKETS here in WOLF’S PUB.


Meanwhile in Amateur Bartender Land…..

While our beloved REAL bartender takes a needed break of unknown duration, we will ENDEAVOR TO PERSEVERE.

Because we did alcohols last week, including menthol, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine, we’ll try some amines this week.

Alcohols begin with the structural moiety -OH whereas amines begin with -NH2. The familiar ethanol is CH3-CH2-OH. Replacing the H on the oxygen of alcohols turns them into things which act completely differently (ethers, esters, etc.), and are no longer called alcohols. In contrast, the H atoms of “primary amines” (-NH2) can be replaced (-NH-, -N(-)-, -N=, etc.), and much of the chemical behavior frequently remains, in which case the substances may still be called amines.

This classification scheme for organic substances is complicated, historical, and sensible, but it is also admittedly very obscure.

Think of amines as nitrogen horning on on oxygen‘s act in the alcohol world. Compared to the very familiar ethanol, other alcohols are different enough, but amines create a whole new ball game. For over a century, amines were possibly the biggest act in the world of pharmaceuticals.

The following three amines are second generation antihistamines.

More on these substances later!


Christmas Spirit

As we are going to keep the Christmas spirit going into 2022, you will note that ornaments are still up – including various old favorites from Christmas Past.

First lady Melania Trump tosses an ornament to a child across the table after he tossed one to her as she visits with children in the East Room among the 2017 holiday decorations with the theme “Time-Honored Traditions” at the White House in Washington, Monday, Nov. 27, 2017. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

We will get that tree up, no matter how much flak from the cultural Marxists!

And there will be GIFTS for all, both NAUGHTY and NICE!!!

How did you like those pictures of Trump and MELANIA???

PSSST! Hey, kid! I’ve got some pictures…….


Trump Calendars

People – it’s getting close to the time to make a decision. Do you want a TRUMP CALENDAR for 2022?

I’m going to let you know about TWO of them that you can get. They ship VERY QUICKLY, too!

Official Trump Calendar

This is a GREAT calendar – heavy on military photos – plenty of Melania.

I can vouch for this one – easily worth the $45 minimum donation to SAVE AMERICA – meaning 90% goes to TRUMP’S CONTROL.

https://secure.winred.com/save-america-joint-fundraising-committee/2022-trump-calendar?amount=45

This is a great way to make an end-of-the-year donation and not feel stiffed by RINOs!

Alternatively…..

Jon McNaughton’s Trump Calendar

I love this guy’s art. Had I not gotten the official Trump Calendar, I might have gotten this one.

Still time to buy, I think, but I have not tried to put an order through.

https://www.grassfire.com/new_pro_trump_2022_wall_calendars_free_shipping

Please let us all know in comments if you order either of these and encounter either success or failure.

And now, the rules of the pub.


HOUSE RULES

God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.

Now, back to business.


AMEN!


Current Art On The Wall

First a bit of pub introspection…..

…..and then some comic relief on the wall in the john!


The Clot Shot Casino is CLOSED

The “ever-mouthy” Karl Denninger has just pointed out some numbers in the Danish Omicron data that really change my perception of relative risks and benefits of vaccination – particularly in light of what we now know about common H1 antihistamines as a class essentially preventing death from COVID.

This is less about SIDE EFFECTS (adverse events – whatever) and more about IMMUNITY STRATEGY.

Let’s Make It Simple

Multiple questions are now answered by this fresh data for a new variant.

First, it’s very clear that the “Wuhan vaccines” are rather BADLY protective against Omicron. While I would not call it a “pandemic of the vaccinated”, the vaccinated ARE over-represented in Omicron cases, and the unvaccinated are under-represented. At least one analyst has speculated that Omicron might have escaped from a laboratory, where it “gained function” in the serum of vaccinees.

The recently boosted have a risk comparable to the unvaccinated, but the vaccinated as a whole are actually MORE LIKELY to get Omicron, which is weird. Combined with the fact found elsewhere, that almost 5% of Danish Omicron patients already had COVID-19, then “Wuhan natural immunity” is suffering its own form of breakthrough as well.

Fine. So the vaccines need boosters, and risks accumulate. The disease is also risky, and not as protective as we had thought.

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR.

Let’s look at that fact – that the VACCINATED (overall) are being hammered harder than the unvaccinated, relative to their proportion in the population.

One explanation is that the “unvaccinated” include a bunch of people who were “vaccinated” by the disease, and have SUPERIOR natural immunity.

Another explanation is that the current Wuhan-variant vaccines are immunizing against the now-absent Wuhan variant, but are LOWERING immunity to new and changed variants- perhaps after some initial immunity, but then waning. And THAT is not an unknown phenomenon.

And, of course, there is the third option, that it is BOTH of those two things.

No matter which way it is, this is not good news for the vaccines. This DATA says that – in real life – “natural immunity” / “no vaccine” is a solid form of protection, and is about as good as “boosterism”. Worse than that, for the vaccines, it appears that “missing the booster” (“2 shots” in the table) leaves one EXTREMELY VULNERABLE to the disease – much more so than being totally unvaccinated.

THIS is starting to explain why the CDC is playing WORD GAMES with “unvaccinated”, where they call people who just got vaccinated “unvaccinated” to blame-cast adverse events as disease, tinkering with THOSE numbers, but they ALSO call people who got two shots “unvaccinated” after some time, when those people are actually “vaccinated but now in vaccine failure”.

Don’t play those word games with me, Dr. Fauci. Those “unvaccinated” people TOOK THE JAB. They’re “vaccinated”. And with TIME, vaccination looks to be a LOSER unless you get REVACCINATED.

How about we use the word “revaccinated”? It’s a bit more honest.

ANYWAY……

Thanks to this recent data, and some other earlier thoughts, two things have become CLARITIN CLEAR.

(1) – Nobody needs to die from COVID, because, if the murderous media would simply tell people, there ARE in fact some common, cheap, easy-to-get, over-the-counter drugs that essentially make it impossible to die from the disease, while in the process obtaining superior “natural” immunity.

(2) – Even if one wants to GAMBLE with the vaccines, which offer less “disease” but also less “immunity”, the vaccines seem to make people MORE susceptible to sufficiently mutated coronavirus variants. That is, unless one gets a booster. Thus, they’re ADDICTIVE, just like gambling and smoking, making one DEPENDENT on the vaccines.

For a deeper discussion of vaccine dependency…..


How Vaccine Addiction Slavery Works

Wherein we explain – at three different levels of scientific and political understanding – how ADE-mediated vaccine slavery works. This post is to PREPARE YOU to watch what the other side is doing RIGHT NOW, so you can spot the deceptions. Right now they are DESPERATELY trying to make a FAILING PLAN work. Their plan …


Is that GOOD? Seriously – is that good? Is it “good” to be dependent for your VERY LIFE on vaccines?

I, personally, don’t think so. It’s like making everybody an insulin-dependent diabetic. And look what Joe Biden (really that asshole Obola) just did to diabetics! A thousand dollars a month! Ridiculous. Recombinant insulin was supposed to FREE our diabetics – not make them slaves!

Because of this, it is not really possible for me to recommend the vaccines as anything more than a RISKY CONVENIENCE – a GAMBLE – by which one avoids a biannual, triennial, or maybe (if you’re lucky) decennial cold or flu, but one also becomes dangerously dependent on the vaccines.

THUS, the CLOT SHOT CASINO (and COVIDIUM DEN) is CLOSED.

You are welcome to gamble elsewhere, but we cannot support gambling in this pub.

So let me state this VERY clearly.

If you are aware of the simple CURE for hospitalization and death from COVID itself, then the addictive, immunity-decreasing vaccines make no sense. This is true EVEN neglecting side-effects, which are substantial AND cumulative.

Now – let me be very clear. But I may have to whisper. And you probably won’t believe me, even after I explain it.


How to Hide a Histaminimus

When I was a kid, one of my favorite books was How to Hide a Hippopotamus.

It was a great lesson in concealment. It was the beginning of understanding.

So what does that have to do with today?

Well, I have a theory. And if that theory is right……

The true “cure” for COVID was never hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin.

These were silver-plated shiny objects – “real” distractions – that allowed the con-job vaccines to move forward. This is why the con-job shiny objects were SEEDED to us in various ways by the other side, who are tricky as hell. They needed to make sure we reacted in a predictable way.

Remember this one?

Or how about THIS ONE?

See what I’m saying? That episode makes far more sense as a PLANNED DISTRACTION than a real “WOO WOO” tell of the drug they were afraid of.

Hollywood WANTED us pointed in a certain direction, by which our PRE-PLANNED OPPOSITION would proceed according to THEIR timetable.

They KNEW how we would react.

Hydroxy and ivermectin were “working shiny objects” that we would predictably glom onto, while missing the REAL fast and easy solution. Missing the real solution, and glomming onto THEIR crippled partial solutions, controlled and denigrated by the other side, would allow THEIR disingenuous solution – injected spike protein toxin – to move forward unopposed.

The real “cure” – the one that the Spanish doctors and the South African doctor found – was simply to take H1 antihistamines and STOP the second phase of the disease.

That’s all. That’s all that’s needed to make COVID-19 a COLD again. Treat it LIKE a cold used to be treated.

Both first and second generation over-the-counter antihistamines work for this. They attack the ROOT of the deaths from COVID, which is the spike protein hypersensitivity reaction that Dr. Chetty describes, and with which everybody is familiar, although perhaps under a variety of immunological descriptions like “cytokine storm”.

Now I’m not saying that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are not effective treatments. Indeed, they are. The other side HAD to oppose those, precisely because they work, and because they diminish hospitalization and death in a very significant way – especially if started EARLY.

BUT those solutions are controlled and media-deniable by the other side. They were never a threat. They are not something the other side had to HIDE. They are something they had to effectively OPPOSE.

That is why the other side used two different approaches. For hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, they used psychological seeding, media denunciation, and institutional opposition and control. For antihistamines, they used diversion to other drugs, media silence, and institutional delay.

The deeper truth is that, had we learned about over-the-counter antihistamines effectively ending death from COVID in early 2020, it would have cut off their vaccine plot AT THE KNEES.

Imagine, if you will, some intrepid journalists being alerted in early 2020 that the Spaniards or Dr. Chetty had something IN HAND that would prevent death by COVID, and it was something a lot of people were taking already for colds and flu. In fact, most families ALREADY had the cure in their houses, because ANY of the H1 antihistamines will do. Imagine what would have happened to vaccines if a “home cure” would have been a worldwide rumor – and then CONFIRMED by the people themselves – and then trumpeted by the frightened media, should they “defect” from the narrative.

THAT is the secret that could not get out.

But if everybody chased the RIGHT drugs – the ones that THEY could control…… – the ones that THEY could denigrate, and fund studies to “disprove”…….

No problem. For THEM.

Marxist Tedros with communist Agnes Buzyn, who stopped prescription of hydroxychloroquine in France.

Do you now see WHY – at a very deep level – Agnes Buzyn made a show of restricting hydroxychloroquine?

THE MEDIA was the real weapon. There was no “walking back” the cure that was already out there, everywhere. They had to make sure we followed the cure that they controlled.

I’m not saying that Agnes Buzyn KNEW this, any more than President Trump KNEW that hydroxychloroquine was a calculated proffering to conceal a more critical weakness. People are led, misled, ordered to do things, and ordered not to do things, knowing that they will respond in certain ways.

I do think the liar Fauci may have known about antihistamines.

In fact, I suspect that VERY FEW people knew the truth about antihistamines, before the COVID release. Maybe only the TOP cabal actors.

Sometimes we have biases on the treatment side. Some folks like hydroxychloroquine. Some folks like ivermectin. Some like fluvoxamine. The list goes on.

The other side did NOT have a BIAS in opposing, controlling, silencing, or otherwise negating the threat of ANY and ALL of the treatment options.

They had a STRATEGY.

Now, I have a similar approach. I like ALL the treatment options, because they all save lives.

Right now, though, I favor bringing attention to antihistamines for a STRATEGIC reason.

It is ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE to kill us with COVID if we have FOUR THINGS.

  • A thermometer
  • An antigen test kit
  • Antihistamine
  • Azithromycin (doctors prescribe this easily)

It’s that simple. This is a simplification of the Spanish study into an “at home” cure.

  • People monitor their temperature
  • If a fever, then use an antigen test kit
  • If positive for COVID, take the antihistamine
  • If pulmonary complications, take the azithromycin

This is simply too easy, and everybody can do it.

Jo Nova has a great blog post on the Spanish study.

There would NEVER have been a push for the mRNA vaccines, or vaccine passports, if enough people – a critical number – had known about the Spanish results in – say – June of 2020.

Even when it was submitted as a paper in September of 2020, if it was big news, it would have complicated the vaccine roll-out. Vaccine passports would NOT have been realistic.

That is why the Spanish study didn’t really see the international light of day, until the vaccines were rolling out, in January 2021.

Received 16 September 2020, Revised 29 December 2020, Accepted 11 January 2021, Available online 16 January 2021.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094553921000018

Are you seeing where this goes?

Good.


Speaking of Actual President Obola

You will recall that – because Obama and Obama’s people are essentially running the Biden administration – at least until Kamala and Hillary take over – I am blaming the insane and inhumane pricing of insulin squarely on the REAL acting President…..

OBOLA.

Now – I used to call Obola “Obola” all the time, back during his cavalier attitude toward Ebola, back in the day.

Little did I realize that the Ebola crisis was all a PSY-OP of the GRANDEST order.

We can now see that Obola was priming the right to run like a bull at the red cape of “airborne Ebola” which was used to deceive us about the lethality of COVID-19.

Obola’s cavalier attitude toward Ebola virus was 100% intentional. That’s easy to see, now.

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR!

Thanks to Deplorable Patriot, J.P. Sears, and Holly, we now have additional proof that the Ebola psy-op was definitely part of the COVID plot.

Let’s start here.

For now, just understand that A.416 was a BILL that would have empowered “Cuomo in a skirt”, Kathy Hochul, to have almost limitless dictatorial powers.

Let’s just save that tweet image, since COMMIES love to hide evidence.

We know this guy Nick Perry is a commie, because Aubergine did research tying him to the reelection campaign of Percy Sutton, one of the BIGGEST communists of the MASSIVELY communist, red diaper, Sutton family, which – again – Aubergine has deeply researched.


A WEB OF COMMIES, STORIES, and LIES; PERCY SUTTON, HIS FAMILY, and even MARY JACOBY!

A while ago, Wolfmoon mentioned the name Percy Sutton in a response to my inquiry about what type of material he wanted for the site while he was away. Wolfmoon stated: “I also have an interest in “red diaper theory”, so the genealogy of all “red diaper lineages” is of interest. I have some projects …


Oh, Percy Sutton was one of the KEY communists in New York City. If Nick Perry was close to this guy, you can COUNT on secret membership, and very likely a DIAPER, too.

Sutton was BIG and he was CONNECTED.

So what, exactly, would A.416 have done?

For a humorous yet very serious take, I give you Mr. Magnesium himself!

Yeah. So a guy strongly connected to a notorious NYC communist proposes a BILL during the phony Ebola crisis, over 5 years ago, which languishes until it’s needed NOW, in the phony COVID crisis, for New York State to go FULL COMMIE.

You know what……..

And if you’re wondering where communism REALLY comes from…..


Minion Meets Master

I don’t get clear demonstrations like this very often, of something which is a strong signal of SATANIC ACTIVITY. Thus, it’s important that I share it with you.

I think it’s pretty clear at this point that the Kardashian world of “people who are famous for being famous” is more than a little connected to YOU KNOW WHO…..

In fact, let’s remind ourselves, who the latest “famiac” in the Kardashian-Jenner tribe happens to be.

LINK: https://vigilantcitizen.com/musicbusiness/something-extremely-dark-happened-at-travis-scotts-deadly-astroworld-festival/

I won’t spend time unraveling the twisted relationships in “Kardashian World”, but between the Jenner klan, Kanye West, and Travis Scott, it’s 200 proof Hollywood.

For those who want to dig into the relationships (not recommended), start HERE.

LINK: https://www.newsweek.com/did-you-just-wake-kim-kardashian-slammed-defending-travis-scott-after-astroworld-1647246

If I had to describe the post-Travis Kardashian vibe, it would be “cultural Satanism”. They’ve gone well beyond cultural Marxism at this point.

I consider this viewpoint validated by THIS NEWS:


ANGIE KUKAWSKI

KARDASHIANS BUSINESS MANAGER MURDERED AT 55 …Boyfriend Charged, D.A. Claims Killing Was ‘Sadistic’

EXCLUSIVE DETAILS 19.1K 12/29/2021 1:41 PM PT

From what I read elsewhere, she was more of an “ex” business manager, but she was actively working that bunch and others.

I will spare you the gruesome details, but not my conclusion – that this was the evil one collecting his due.

Do NOT – I repeat – DO NOT get involved with this stuff. Keep it at bay. STAY AWAY.

A certain amount of AWARENESS is good. “Wise as serpents” is a survival skill in spiritual warfare. We need some folks who train to see the traps. But it helps not to get jaded, familiar, or worst of all comfortable with the dark side. Periodic REVULSION is necessary.

What you are seeing here is the CONSUMPTION of those who make deals with the devil. They are CONSUMED IN THE FLAMES of the EVIL ONE when their usefulness is over.

I am sure this talented lady was well-rewarded for promoting the people she promoted, but she was likewise promoting everything at the top of Satan’s wish list for humanity.

In the end she was consumed, Ninth Gate-style.

I will skip the image of Frank Langela consumed in flames – and stick with this one.

Don’t make deals with this stuff – even small ones.

Are y’all good? AMEN! So STAY THAT WAY.


General Flynn on Exposing TRUTH

After Gen. Flynn’s “misunderstanding” (at best) or misrepresentation (at worst) of that rather culty Christian prayer in the name of the angel Michael as being “Catholic”, when it was clearly at best “small c catholic” (meaning under the umbrella of all Christianity, multi-schismatic or not, and even including “weird AF New Age”), I honestly feel a bit of a chafe under my very loose collar to be quoting Flynn on ANYTHING related to the subject of “exposing truth”.

I mean, the guy is a spy. Disinformation has to be a huge part of the job.

However, none of that diminishes what he says here. So just take a listen.


LINK: https://t.me/RealGenFlynn/1807

This is a big deal!!!

The inspection [of dominion machines] had been scheduled for earlier this month but the [PA] state attorney general and secretary of state oddly sued to prevent any such move to affirm the accuracy of the 2020 election results.

[per the court] It’s now set for Jan. 10.”

While everyone is fighting back on the covid insanity, watching the results of the Maxwell trial outcome, still reeling from outrageous illegal and massive border crossings, the lies and deceit of the 1/6 insurrection crucifixion (read Revolver and follow Darren Beattie), etc, etc…

The truth will always rise to the top. Those that live in the darkness will be destroyed by the light of the truth.

Keep doing all you can to expose the truth…I know it is not easy and it takes time to discover, research and read or listen to the various interviews, but do it for the good of our country and our kids.

Elements (elected and unelected) within our USG are so corrupt, it is disgusting. However, with the right attitude, leadership, discipline, and focus, much of this corruption can be cleaned up.

Get involved! Make Local Action your thing and do more for your community and our country 🙏🏼🇺🇸


Wolf again. I think he’s got that right.

The truth WILL rise to the top.

Sometimes, that truth may make US sweat a little bit – like when I have to admit that I was a cheerleader for the vaccines before they became the “clot shot”. But that’s OK. We can’t always be RIGHT. But we CAN always TRY to be right. Even after we fail. Maybe ESPECIALLY after we fail.

And – ironically – that is both SCIENCE and – for some of us – RELIGION.


New Year’s Eve

Happy New Year, y’all. Please STAY SAFE. Don’t drink and drive, yada, yada, yada.

If you DO go out and party, and you’ve not had COVID recently (Delta or later), then spend the next FOUR DAYS (incubation period) collecting everything you need to get through a wonderful case of the traveling vaccine, OMICRON.

(Or OBOLA, as I am starting to call it.)

Assuming you don’t have ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, you need:


Wolf’s COVID Care Package

  • Thermometer (thermal digital is easiest)
  • Antigen test kit(s) (yeah, good luck finding one)
  • Antihistamine of your choice (Claritin, Zyrtec, and Allegra are the easiest – 1-2 a day)
  • Aspirin (regular, or low-dose if your stomach doesn’t like it – 1 a day)
  • Listerine or Betadine mouthwash/gargle for mouth and throat
  • Vitamin D, Zinc, Calcium, Magnesium, Multivitamin including Selenium.
  • Quercetin (including natural sources) or Green Tea
  • Saline or other nasal spray, rinse, or wash of your choice

The thermometer tells you when to use your precious test kit – when you suddenly have a fever and a sore or tingly throat.

The test kit gets you a positive diagnosis that opens doors for things like antibodies, or an official test.

A positive test means you can BEGIN TREATMENT at THERAPEUTIC DOSES.

The antihistamine insures that YOU WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY NOT DIE, because it stops the second, allergic, inflammatory stage of COVID in its tracks.

The aspirin makes doubly sure you won’t get clots, but be careful – don’t take it if you’ve had trouble with aspirin. Talk to your doctor if unsure.

The gargles (Listerine or Betadine) massively reduce viral load and speed time to recovery.

The saline and nasal washes lower viral load, and maintain nasal breathing.

The quercetin and green tea help zinc’s antiviral action by increasing cellular zinc levels.

The vitamins and mineral supplements keep you at antiviral levels of these things. In particular, zinc and vitamin D3 need to be at non-deficient levels.

Please consult authoritative sources from TRUE medical doctors like the ones at https://flccc.net.

Now – THAT is your physical health.

BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR!


Your SPIRITUAL HEALTH is – in my opinion – what really matters. I strongly recommend DAILY readings from the Bible. Doesn’t have to be much. Whether it’s Duchess’s comments, or a daily reading from a pocket devotional, if you get in the habit of thinking about the Bible EVERY DAY, you will do GREAT.

Thank you all for being here. Have a wonderful 2022.

W

In the first year of Darius son of Xerxes[a] (a Mede by descent), who was made ruler over the Babylonian[b] kingdom— in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, understood from the Scriptures, according to the word of the Lord given to Jeremiah the prophet, that the desolation of Jerusalem would last seventy years. So I turned to the Lord God and pleaded with him in prayer and petition, in fasting, and in sackcloth and ashes.

Making Sense of Pro-Vax Trump

Risks, Bets, Rewards and Losses – Why Vaccine-Conferred and Disease-Conferred Immunity are Both Proper Personal Gambles When Choice is Free and Enough Truth is Known or Unknown


Many of us were shocked that President Trump just showed his “pro-vax” hand in an interview with vaxx nutt Bill O’Reilly, but if you watch Trump long enough, you realize that he very often gets to the optimal perspective before anybody else – even with incomplete data.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1472987776786354177

It’s worth wondering why Trump said what he said, and said it when he said it.

Beyond the “credit” issue – which I can really see for many reasons, not the least of which is because Trump’s plan really messed up the Cabal plans on COVID – I think Trump knows people who are seeing the emerging data. And I think they are advising him correctly.

I’m going to try to show you some of that data, and what it means.

Rand Paul is a sharp guy, too. Trump respects Rand Paul. It pays to ask why. I think that part of it is because Rand is a doctor. Trump respects doctors, I am convinced. And Trump knows that doctors differ in their opinions, like everybody else, and that he (Trump) needs to listen to a number of them, to see where the best perspective resides.

Rand is not anti-vaxx. He’s pro-natural-immunity. There is a difference.

At the place where Trump’s viewpoint and Rand Paul’s viewpoint intersect, you will find much truth. I certainly did. And when I added in a few other doctors “on our side”, and looked carefully at where I was skeptical of some of their thinking, but also let them convince me to be skeptical of some of my own thinking, I hit the jackpot.

BOTH the vaccines AND the disease make sense as alternative, risky, immunity-conferring antigens. Neither one is obviously superior to the other for everybody, because the landscape of risk and benefit is too complex, and depends far too much on the needs, goals, and medical circumstances of the individual. Worse still, past choices – including accidental ones – affect future choices.

Rand Paul saw right into this – that the CRUX of the problem is that “natural immunity” is being ignored by a monetarily, scientifically, and institutionally compromised medical establishment. Natural, disease-conferred immunity is the BEST CHOICE for many people – particularly when combined with a “delay of onset” strategy, and TREATMENT, which alters the risk/benefit. We have known this all along, yet we have never truly internalized it, because the “Let’s You And Him Fight” strategy of the OBAMA MANDATES has widened and deepened the division between those who choose vaccines and those who don’t.

AND LOGIC.

Trump GETS THIS. And he said so. We ARE falling into their trap. BUT we can turn that around on a DIME.

It is critical for our side – the free and sane medicine side – to EXPOSE and BASH the performance of the vaccines, because the other side won’t do it. But it is also critical that we STAND UP for the freedom for others to take those risky vaccines voluntarily, and accept the truth that it can make sense, during a period where we don’t know everything, and MAYBE beyond that, after we know more.

Mandates are absolutely stupid, reckless, and anti-science. They interfere with medicine. The mandating commies need to BTFO. But letting fearful people take a risky vaccine – a personal gamble – is a part of freedom that we have to respect.

I want to show you data that makes this make sense.


Some of you may be surprised that I am defending the COVID vaccines AT ALL. At present I have ZERO intention of taking one. For me, and my wife, they are a BAD medical choice. For many others, too.

Well, what if I tell you that in doing so, I can defend disease-conferred immunity EVEN MORE?

What if I tell you that I can now see why, strategically, Trump waited until we “knee-capped” – but didn’t kill – the vaccines?

BOTH SIDES HAD TO SEE MORE CLEARLY.

Let me help you see more clearly.


Natural Immunity – More Risk With More Reward?

What I just said there is not always true.

For CHILDREN, it appears that the vaccines are MORE RISK, LESS REWARD.

Yeah, Trump was right about that.

It’s a NO-BRAINER to NOT, NOT, NEVER, EVER give this shit to kids, and I personally hope that God himself does whatever is needed to save children from the MONSTERS who are injecting them with these RELATIVELY dangerous vaccines.

Kids are being deprived of EXCELLENT natural immunity, for JUNK immunity that makes money for Big Pharma.

Just for starters, we may be condemning these kids to a lifetime of life-robbing spike boosters, just by virtue of a well-understood idea of “original antigenic sin”, or OAS. OAS is where one antigen leads to an inappropriate response to a later antigen, vaccine, or infection.

This means that if we give children a misleading FIRST ANTIGENIC STIMULUS, they may then be STUCK with sub-optimal antibody immunity, leaving them for an unknown time at GREATER RISK from the disease. It may very well be that the BEST FIRST ANTIGEN for SARS-CoV-2 is the DISEASE – not a spike protein vaccine.

We don’t KNOW what will happen long-term when we inject kids. Or, at least, most of us don’t. Maybe Fauci does.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Is it a good idea? Should we bet ALL our kids on that idea?

NO FREAKING WAY.

And THAT is assuming that these vaccines do nothing to affect fertility. If they DO affect fertility, then this has to be made a KNOWN and ADMITTED risk, at the very least – not covered up, like it is right now.

A call for Nuremberg II, more likely, if this was knowingly advanced.

Who wants to risk their kids’ chance of having children?

This brings up the question of whether parents have the right to *knowingly* neuter their kids. Some parents already are, by “transing” kids. I think it’s pretty clear that’s where the Cabal is going – neutering and spaying humans. Interesting question. Should it be sent to SCOFFLAW SCOTUS? How is Amy Comey Barren going to vote on that one?

Asking for a FIEND.

I would even extend that thinking to teens and young adults. There is no reason that I can see to give them the vaccine. But should they have that choice, in consultation with their doctors? Interesting question. Very hard to reconcile a pro-life position with that, isn’t it?

But back to natural immunity.


Natural Immunity – More Rewards

Are there, in fact, more rewards?

I think so. Look at these two figures from the UK Ministry of Health, showing spike protein antibodies in people in England in 2021.

LINK:

…..https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf

The darker the color, the stronger the antibodies.

The first graphs are people who have no evidence of having caught the disease (N protein negative). They include the unvaccinated uninfected and the vaccinated uninfected.

The yellow is the unvaccinated people who have not caught the disease – mostly kids.

Green, blue and purple are various levels of vaccination success – the darker, the more spike antibodies.

Now look at people who got some or all of their spike immunity by natural infection with the disease.

Assuming it’s a wash as far as the quality of the antibodies – which is not necessarily true – it’s obvious that these recoverees have a more robust spike antibody immunity – to say nothing of likely immunity to some or all of the other 20+ proteins in SARS-CoV-2.

Rand Paul, right here. The man is asking the right questions.

So why is Fauci ignoring this natural immunity stuff?

Notice that KIDS don’t mount a strong spike immunity, even though they beat down the disease in a hurry, with minimal symptoms. This is likely an EVOLVED RESPONSE – an EVOLVED STRATEGY – a form of EVOLVED INTELLIGENCE. What it says is that kids “know” by evolution – don’t build a lasting defense to the ever-changing spike protein. Meanwhile, the virus tries to “rope-a-dope” us slowly into concentrating on the spike as we age, misleading us with each attack. We lean on the crutch of spike antibodies that don’t work on the next strain, or actually make things worse.

Kinda funny that Fauci and the “follow the science” types don’t respect this signal from evolution, but whatever. That’s the basis of another post. But keep it in mind – it’s likely important.

So let us not digress.

The bottom line is that IF you’re going to make spike antibody immunity your standard of success, which Fauci and company clearly have, as part of Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis”, then by that standard, “natural immunity” from the disease gives MORE REWARD.

And again, I remind you, there are MANY other metrics of immunological success which are highly relevant, and which are ignored under Fauci spike antibody hypnosis. Always keep that in mind.


Natural Immunity – More Risks

SO – is the disease “more risk” to get that more reward?

My answer would be “maybe”.

It’s a complex calculation – particularly if you factor in “not getting the disease until you get it”. When you vaccinate, it’s a down payment in full, and with boosters, you’re even stuck with installments. You are “accepting that the risks happen” at 100%. Vaccination “collapses the probabilities”. But if you take your chances on the disease, by simply not vaccinating, you are delaying the (probably) higher risk, but the “risk over time” is substantially reduced.

Imagine the “payoff” of not vaccinating or getting the disease until Omicron. That would have been a GREAT gamble and winnings.

But let’s look at an ACTUAL COMPARATIVE RISK of vaccine vs. disease.

Now – let me be clear from the start – this article is a CLICK-BAIT CHERRY-PICKING of the highest order. The title numbers SEEM shocking – until you dig into it, and go to the source.

But still, they’re not “lying”. It’s just misguided. But that CHAFF led me to WHEAT.

Let me include the entire, short report, as it appeared in GWP.


On December 14th, 2021, Nature Medicine released a study based on a broad population data set analyzed by researchers at Oxford University. The researchers examined the risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination and infection.

The Oxford researchers reveal that 1 in 100 or 1% of all vaccinated individuals were admitted to the hospital or died with arrhythmia or irregular heartbeat.

Of the 38,615,491 vaccinated individuals included in our study, 385,508 (1.0%) were admitted to hospital with or died from cardiac arrhythmia at any time in the study period (either before or after vaccination); 86,754 (0.2%) of these occurred in the 1-28 days after any dose of vaccine. Of those who were admitted or died 39,897 (10.3%) had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test, with 29,694 (7.7%) having a positive test before vaccination. There were 7,795 deaths with cardiac arrhythmia recorded as the cause of death (1,108 had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test).

So 1 in 100 of the vaccinated individuals are going to the hospital with irregular heart beat and this isn’t international headlines?

This is a shocking number.

James Cintolo has more on this study.


Wolf again.

This study appeared in the journal NATURE. That is the big leagues. We have to take this seriously. But let’s look at it closely. It REALLY helps to see that entire document, although SUSPICIOUS CAT should come out, just looking at the TITLE.

NATURE PAPER: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0

Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection

See? This isn’t just about the vaccines – it looks at infection, too. Is Gateway Pundit giving us the full story? Maybe not.

ABSTRACT:

Although myocarditis and pericarditis were not observed as adverse events in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine trials, there have been numerous reports of suspected cases following vaccination in the general population. We undertook a self-controlled case series study of people aged 16 or older vaccinated for COVID-19 in England between 1 December 2020 and 24 August 2021 to investigate hospital admission or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias in the 1–28 days following adenovirus (ChAdOx1, n = 20,615,911) or messenger RNA-based (BNT162b2, n = 16,993,389; mRNA-1273, n = 1,006,191) vaccines or a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive test (n = 3,028,867). We found increased risks of myocarditis associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 vaccines and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine over the 1–28 days postvaccination period, and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3), one (95% CI 0, 2) and six (95% CI 2, 8) myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively, in the 28 days following a first dose and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273. This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41) myocarditis events per 1 million patients in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We also observed increased risks of pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmias following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Similar associations were not observed with any of the COVID-19 vaccines, apart from an increased risk of arrhythmia following a second dose of mRNA-1273. Subgroup analyses by age showed the increased risk of myocarditis associated with the two mRNA vaccines was present only in those younger than 40.

The TRUTH is right in there.

First, we have to remember that GWP was concentrating on 1% of vaccinated people during the study period, INCLUDING before they got vaccinated, going to the hospital for or dying from a cardiac arrhythmia. That “before they got vaccinated” point is a TIP, right there, that we really need to consider the risk for UNVACCINATED people, too – including these very same people – for comparison. And as an aside, what is the number for corresponding unvaccinated people? You can almost guess that for most old people, it’s gonna be – well – maybe 1%?

And indeed, when the researchers compared the risk of an “event” against the risks of these patients BEFORE vaccination, they got their answers.

The WORST CASE for the vaccines was myocarditis. So let’s look at that, first.

Here is the risk from the vaccines. Broken out with [notations] so it’s easy to understand.


We found increased risks of myocarditis

associated with the first dose of ChAdOx1 [AstraZeneca] and BNT162b2 [Pfizer] vaccines

and the first and second doses of the mRNA-1273 [Moderna] vaccine

over the 1–28 days postvaccination period,

and after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. [STRONGLY NOTE THIS!!!]

We estimated an extra two (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 3),

one (95% CI 0, 2)

and six (95% CI 2, 8)

myocarditis events per 1 million people vaccinated with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively,

in the 28 days following a first dose

and an extra ten (95% CI 7, 11) myocarditis events per 1 million

vaccinated in the 28 days after a second dose of mRNA-1273.


SO – this confirms what we know. The vaccines cause myocarditis. It’s a RISK. It’s a handful or two in a million, per injection.

But now, let’s look at the NEXT LINE.


This compares with an extra 40 (95% CI 38, 41)

myocarditis events per 1 million patients

in the 28 days following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test.


What this says TO ME is that the risk of this one heart problem, in a vaccine that gives less immunity, is a significant fraction of the same risk from the disease.

Obviously due to the SPIKE PROTEIN, and possibly with a simple correlation to exposure.

I will admit that it’s LESS RISK from the vaccines, but not all that much.

Look at MODERNA.

The compiled risk of myocarditis from the TWO SHOTS (6+10 = 16) is 40% of the disease risk (40).

And yet HERE is how the authors have to word things to get it past the referees and editors.


“In summary, this population-based study quantifies for the first time the risk of several rare cardiac adverse events associated with three COVID-19 vaccines as well as SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in adults was associated with a small increase in the risk of myocarditis within a week of receiving the first dose of both adenovirus and mRNA vaccines, and after the second dose of both mRNA vaccines. By contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a substantial increase in the risk of hospitalization or death from myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmia.


They played a lot of word games there – take it from a retired scientist. They are also STUDIOUSLY AVOIDING some big stories that would rub the industry wrong.

“Give the editors what they want.”

Now, before I examine that conclusion for further trickery on the “within a week” qualifier and several other points (not today), I just want to say that calling 16 “small” and 40 “substantial” is bullshit.

Author bias, implicit or imposed, as a virtue signal to Bill Gates’ “vaccine culture” in science.

I will bet MONEY that a third Moderna booster would come in at 14 or more, bringing the total myocarditis events from chronic spike protein exposure to 30 or more, AND at the 4th injection SURPASSING the risk of ONE untreated disease incidence.

Well, is it worth it?

I don’t want Dementia Joe telling ME that it’s worth it. I want to make that determination MYSELF.

And GUESS WHAT? I will also bet money that part of the reason that CDC wanted people to mix and match boosters was to get Moderna “recoverees” boosted with the less cardiotoxic Pfizer or J+J vaccines, while not admitting that…

….defects from each spike protein vaccine are cumulative.

See how that works? Science. It’s great when you’re HONEST.

And why IS Pfizer causing fewer cardiac problems? In my opinion, it is very likely because the vaccine is distributing more widely and slowly in the body, thanks to the extreme vaccine lipid nanoparticle longevity (hence shedding) and biodistribution – data that was hidden from us, but turned up in the Japanese freedom of information request.

To me, the fact that nobody sees or talks about this stuff, is just more evidence of “vaccine hypnosis” of academia, as noted by Peter McCullough.

The reality? PICK YOUR POISON. Disease or vaccine.

If we go back to the arrhythmia example, it turns out that the “shocking 1%” actually GOES AWAY when compared to the unvaccinated. This makes sense, when you recall the very common problem of “palpitation” sending people to the ER, long before “long COVID” was a thing.

Yeah, 1% is shocking, but it’s shocking for the unvaccinated, too. Gateway Pundit was just throwing unwarranted shade.

Now, let’s take a look at some GRAPHICS from the study. Pictures tell a thousand words – not all bad for the vaccines – not all bad for “natural immunity”.

On the left axis you have the three vaccines, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna, followed by the disease.

On the bottom axis, time – repeated three times for the three diseases.

As you can see for cardiac arrhythmia (right side), the vaccines are basically fine, but the disease is problematic. This makes LOTS of sense, because the disease seems to cause many problems by nerve infiltration, secondary to vascular distribution, and those nervous system infections and inflammations are highly relevant for arrhythmias, whereas the vaccine is primarily a vascular villain, which does NOT reproduce and infiltrate.

The science makes sense here! Wonderful!

All of the vaccines have at least a little bit of myocarditis effect (left side), which is explained nicely by vascular distribution of the spike protein. Moderna, which is notorious for “disease-like symptoms” at the recipient experience level, is easily expected to have even more COVID-like spike protein effects that are not immediately obvious, such as myocarditis.

Big point – ONLY the disease (bottom side) kicks off all three diseases. THAT is what a virus can do, that a bare protein, or even a non-reproducing virus-like particle, cannot.

Everything is making sense here. Let’s look at ANOTHER view of the data.

This graph has some GREAT STUFF. The myocarditis comparison described in detail above, is the graph on the LEFT. The numbers for the vaccines look substantially less, but you can see how Moderna boosters would quickly approximate the disease, and are already like a “mild case” in terms of risks. The authors of the paper avoid talking about the cumulative risks, but it’s clear that “boosterama” is PRECISELY Fauci’s game plan, and it has problems that got solved for Moderna by mix-and-match boosters.

Fauci and Walensky. Always taking care of their companies. Yeah, I kinda get it. But you gotta be HARD-ASS with them, like Director Wolf Moon would be.

The whole vaccine thing – including a lot of other adverse effects I’ve mentioned previously but not discussed here – looks to me like a trade-off. These are NOT good vaccines. They’re actually pretty marginal. BUT for people who really don’t think they can take the disease, it could be a reasonable gamble, IMO.

There are LOTS of people who take these vaccines, and no problem. I know – I talk to them all the time. I’m the most vaccine-supportive vaccine skeptic on Earth. These people just dump everything to me, because they know I don’t judge them, but respect their decisions. I’m interested in what happened to them, and they tell me.

NADA. ZIP. The most common reaction. For those people, the shot may make sense. But there are a good number of others who get laid up hard for a day in bed, and it sounds almost as bad as COVID. I worry about them. Some – A LOT.

Now look at the second graph – myocarditis in younger people. Clearly Moderna is WAY out of whack, and the others are comparable to the disease when boosted. Again – for these people – really BAD vaccines. This is why you saw action on the vaccines. Get values up close to the disease, in terms of numerical risks, and the problem becomes an elevator pitch that everybody understands.

Pericarditis and arrhythmia? Purely a disease problem. This looks very good for the vaccine. This is what you WANT with a vaccine – to AVOID some problem of the disease. BUT – can we trust those numbers?

I think so, and I think that Gateway Pundit got burned by looking at COMMENTS on a blog post explaining the Nature study.

LINK: https://jamescintolo.substack.com/p/new-bombshell-myocarditis-study-out

This is a GREAT post – here is the conclusion:


 THE TAKEAWAY

Public health policy in the USA and UK need to change fast. As a side note, if you listen to the mainstream media enough they’ll have you believing myocarditis is a mild symptom. Let me be clear, by definition, symptoms requiring hospitalization are defined as severe. What’s more, the average mortality rate of non-fulminant myocarditis is nearly 56% which is experienced within 3-10 years. Sadly, that is a consequence of the likely heart failure that develops after the acute phase of myocarditis has resolved. See picture below 👇🏻

All things considered, it is clear that individuals under 40 are at a high risk of experiencing vaccine induced myocarditis. The good news is, there are ways to deal with this. More specifically, increasing the time between the first and second dose, not giving boosters to all healthy individuals under 40, pausing Moderna for many under 30, and seeking the guidance of other countries. All of that makes for better public health policy and positive health outcomes. To finish, I will leave you with the words of a wise man, “Health care is vital to all of us some of the time, but public health is vital to all of us all of the time”. – C. Everett Koop


Wolf again.

Now – in the comments, somebody mentioned the “1% issue”, and I suspect this is where GWP picked it up. Sadly, the comment author deleted and restated their comment, probably after realizing it had spawned a widely read article.

Here is the replacement comment, with replies.


zuFpM5*M6 hr ago I erased my previous comment. The closer I look at this study, the more it freaks me out.

They compare vaxxed to vaxxed+covid and then declare covid is worse, but they measure rates of myocarditis/pericarditis in post covid with troponin levels and in post vaxx with hospitalization rates. Hmmmm

They don’t include any control group of unvaxxed. The vaxx+covid group should be compared to unvaxx+covid to determine the actual rate of post covid heart issues. This is not done that I can tell?

The vaccinated showed a 1% hospitalization rate for cardiac arrhythmia with ~385,000 in the period up to 28 days post vaccination. I tried to look up population rates of hospitalization and found some old news articles discussing ~350,000-500,000 hospitalizations annually for ‘atrial fibrillation’ for the entire US population. So a group of vaccinated in UK blew out the entire US annual budget of arrhythmia hospitalizations in a couple month period? And that isn’t a highlighted part of the research results but instead they compare only within the vaccinated group broken out by short temporal periods? Isn’t the most important thing the vaccinated versus background normal rate?

I begin to think this whole study was gamed to get vaccinated rates of these issues versus supposed covid rates so they could continue to say vaccines are safer, when the actual #s are showing a horrific rise in these issues. It is a preemptive narrative shaping attempt.

I am not a doctor, researcher or number cruncher, so if I am misunderstanding this, I would be interested to hear how.
br143 hr ago There’s no way to sugar coat the study.

Of the ~385,000 people with arrhythmia, 10.3% had a positive Covid-19 test, and 7.7% tested positive at some point prior to vaccination.

Even if you remove 18% of the total, that’s still an awful lot of people with arrhythmia. I suppose most of us have some form of arrhythmia at some time in our lives, but how many of us are treated in hospital?
zuFpM5*M3 hr ago Yes. I would not subtract them either. I feel that there would be a covid risk increase + vaccine risk increase + covid/vaccine interaction risk increase to account for. None of which can be done without estimating the covid risk increase by comparing with non-vaccinated covid patients.

This is where they lost me. They’re just tossing out “maybes”. Nothing jumps out at me as likely to change the result. I can even add my own experience with cardiovascular issues from the disease. They’re REAL. Very unlikely that the vaccines and disease would FLIP on the relative risks of arrhythmia.

Score 1 for the vaccines.

BACK TO THE TRUMP ISSUE.


Benefits of the Vaccine Admitted by Our Side

There is a GREAT video by Geert Vanden Bossche that I keep pushing, because it is one of the clearest explanations of why “leaky mass vaccination” is a bad idea. Note that this is from a pro-vaxxer who has indeed worked with vaccines for his whole career, and is a former member of GAVI.

He just demands good vaccines, and good public vaccination policy.

Now – if you jump to around 4:30 in the video, you can hear him list the positives of the clot shot. HOWEVER, it may be better to just invest some of your time in that 4 1/2 minutes where he warms up to that point, to understand that he’s putting the positives AND the negatives in context, and looking at the bigger picture to recommend that we NOT mass-vaccinate.

He is saying that we should NOT mass-vaccinate IN SPITE OF the benefits that he lists and explains.

  • a decrease of disease in many countries
  • decline of morbidity and mortality rates
  • less illness in people who got vaccinated
  • severe disease is resisted even when vaccinees are infected with variants
  • they will shed much less virus than the unvaccinated, even when infected with variants
  • seropositivity rates are increasing in the population thanks to vaccination

But THAT is where he begins to disagree with mass vaccination. He states that we will NOT reach herd immunity, due to variants, and he explains this fully.


Global Problems of Sub-Optimal Mass Vaccination

At 28:00 minutes, Geert explains what we need to do – which is NOT what public officials are doing.

The current mass vaccination program will make things worse, in the long term. Geert explains then the kinds of vaccines we really need – vaccines which can both generate sterilizing immunity, AND which prime the immune systems of their recipients toward cellular immunity.

Yeah, it’s a bit of a tough goal, but it’s realistic toward the challenges of the China virus, and honest about what we need to do.

So what does this mean about the benefits of the vaccine?

THEY ARE REAL, BUT THEY ARE SHORT-SIGHTED. And they are accompanied by risks. Not just to the vaccinees, but to ALL OF US ON THIS PLANET.

According to Geert, continued vaccination is going to HARM vaccinees, relative to the unvaccinated, who will need to avoid virus-shedding vaccinees. At that point, recoverees may be in the best position of all, but still – not great. ALL of us will be in trouble from the virus which will escape the vaccines.

Geert also explains how we can prove that he is correct – by looking at the mutations in the virus which is shed from vaccinees, which will show selection for more infectious variants, if he is correct.

Now – this is a GREAT interview of Geert by Dana Loesch, who looks more and more like Sandra Bullock for some reason, but what the heck – the shotgun shells on her microphone setup are EXCELLENT, very non-Bullock, and she gets a FANTASTIC explanation of the problem from Geert.

Geert actually talks about Omicron, and the DANGER of it potentially evolving to be MORE SEVERE.

Take a listen!

Does Trump know this stuff? I don’t know.

I personally believe that Geert is right. I am now of the opinion that most of what we are hearing from Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, and Geert Vanden Bossche is true, but that each one has to give a little toward the ultimate truth.

What does that look like to me?

  • Natural immunity is NOT permanent or complete toward other variants
  • Natural immunity is better than the vaccines, generally speaking, but not bulletproof
  • Untreated COVID is a loser relative to the vaccines, but treated COVID is a winner
  • McCullough’s natural immunity prediction based on SARS1 may be too confident
  • Malone’s whistleblower on more shedding by vaccinees may have been wrong or disinformation
  • Geert’s vax-brag of less shedding by vaccinees may have been too kind and not skeptical enough
  • We have to stop pushing the vaccines, for the good of humanity
  • We have to allow the vaccines to continue, at an acceptably lower rate, for research
  • We have to allow vaccines to change faster, to keep up with mutations, IF and only IF this will not PUSH the virus to mutate and select faster (immune pressure must be low enough)
  • We have to pursue the superior vaccines that Geert is specifying
  • We have to use infection, treatment, and recovery as a big gun to reach herd immunity
  • We have to let COVID burn out of epidemic status, to reach a treatable endemic status
  • We cannot do that with mass vaccination, so mandates must cease promptly and completely
  • Joe Biden and CDC must be stopped – by military power if need be – if they will not end the crazy mandates

Yeah, you heard me. We can’t let this demented bozo, backed by an evil Obama and China, make COVID worse by mass vaccination. Mandates are making things worse.


Freedom, Vaccines and Morality

Trump may not understand Geert Vanden Bossche’s warning, but if we set that aside as an unknown, you can understand where Trump is coming from.

If we want freedom, we have to let other people make stupid choices that affect them most of all. Vaccination is, in fact, one of those things. Indeed, it is by US seeing it that way, that I believe we will end this nightmare of division which PUMPS UP the vaxxies and the crazy mandates.

In the same way that there are vaxxies who now are defending OUR freedom to be unvaccinated, I believe we have to defend the right of people to stupidly (or smartly) take the vaccine. However, we MUST get the rate of vaccination DOWN below the level where immune pressure from the vaccine creates more and more infectious variants.


The FIRST thing is not to take the vaccine yourself, or give it to your children.

The SECOND thing is to fight for an end to mandates.

The THIRD thing is to fight for BETTER vaccines, and to expand belief that the current vaccines are NOT GOOD ENOUGH, and are of the WRONG TYPE. Make the vaxxies demand better, not defend bad vaxxes.

The FOURTH thing is to spread the message that the “socially responsible thing to do” is to support Vanden Bossche’s position, that NOT taking the vaccine NOW is what will ultimately “save grandma”.

The last one is a hard sell, with FAKE NEWS pumping vaccine stupidity, but hey – we’ve fought tougher battles already.


So what about Trump?

Well, he is not in the position to know or respond to the “Geert Vanden Bossche Question”. Not yet. It is only when that issue becomes BURNING HOT, that Trump will be able to smartly push FORWARD from the current stupid CLOT SHOTS.

We will have to RAISE VACCINE CONSCIOUSNESS to levels of understanding that SUBVERT FAKE NEWS. We can only do that by getting most of the vaxxies on our side – to demand BETTER vaccines.

If they want to be guinea pigs – GREAT. They can be heroes, and try the deadly experimental vaccines. But we should NOT be forcing all of humanity to be part of a BAD and MISGUIDED experiment.

And the JOKERS who are allegedly running our military need to understand this. Virtue signals which kill troops, even if slowly and quietly, where nobody can see them, are NOT ACTUALLY VIRTUOUS. I appreciate them kicking out the sane ones who understand that the current bad clot shots may cripple readiness at some point, rather than forcibly injecting them. We WILL have a reserve of trained people who are not destroyed by China and Biden, no matter what China’s coming chess moves. Thank you for that. But as for everything else – there could have been push-back against communism, instead of acquiescence.

Yes, we had to be shown. But I’m not sure showing us subservience to a COUP and CHINA and FAKE NEWS isn’t undoing half of the good stuff.

But this as well. If you guys delivered Omicron on purpose, thanks. It LOOKS like it may be working.

Merry Christmas!

W

The Vaccine-Powered Rona-Coaster

Is the Directed Evolution of Variants – Something Deeply Understandable to Joe Biden’s Science Advisors – Being Abused by the Corporate-Government-Academic Axis?

Yeah, you remember that one!

Several hat tips to Sundance on this one, too.

It’s now becoming very clear that the mercenary Bill Gates getting involved with healthcare was one of the LAST things that one could reasonably expect to help it.

We were such chumps.

GRIFTERS GONNA GRIFT.

They don’t “change”. They don’t “turn over a new leaf”. They GRIFT MORE and they GRIFT BIGGER.

Two international vaccine experts can help us to see how we got into the SUSTAINABLE GRIFT of needless vaccines to endlessly mutating viruses, which Bill Gates helped engineer.

Notice that I didn’t say sustainability grift – that’s a different grift, that uses MIRAGES of process sustainability to sell the opposite.

An excellent example of the sustainability grift is wind power, which – when you count all the resource consumption and natural destruction needed to “move lots of matter around with low energy output”, wastes more energy and resources overall, than it produces – and in the long run is NOT actually “sustainable”.

Wind power uses a mirage of overall sustainability which results from hypnosis by the microscopic sustainability of just ONE STAGE in the process, to sell a totality which is not truly sustainable or even efficient. Solar power is very similar. It has its uses, but the mirage they sell is far outside of the truth.

This type of grifting uses a misleading focus on part of the truth to sell a larger untruth, which is how many science grifts work.

Perpetual motion machines are an exemplary grift, and Anthony Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis” is an exemplary misdirection.

No – a sustainable grift (which can include the sustainability grift, cutely) is a grift that maintains itself in perpetuity, provided nobody looks closely. One of the best ways to create such a grift, is to pose a general source of a problem as a solution to it, so that the central problem will NEVER be solved.

This is a form of misleading by REVERSING reality. It’s a CYCLIC grift, that creates a false solution which is really a problem source.

Black Lives Matter(TM) is precisely that kind of sustainable grift.

To solve policing problems, BLM/Soros creates more problems and mischaracterizes them so that they can’t be solved.

BLM(TM), working with Soros DAs and AGs, creates thousands of new criminals of all kinds, at the same time hindering police, in the name of mercy for criminals who are intentionally misportrayed as innocent.

If you can pull it off, this kind of misleading can create monumental, whole-of-society grifts, that in some cases can NEVER be undone.

Climate change / global warming / global freezing are all beautiful GRIFTS of that nature, joined by the principle that “together, we can all do something impossible” – even better if it’s something needless. If the workers of the scam movement get busted, they just change the story – like all criminals do.

“Government will protect you from what it cannot affect.”

Fall for that kind of scam, and you are a SLAVE FOR LIFE.

So where does this go with vaccines?


Bill Gates Takes Over Global Vaccination

Astrid Stuckelberger figured out what was happening to global public health when Bill Gates took control of it, but she figured it out too late.

I highly recommend reading this article:

https://uncanceled.news/former-who-employee-dr-astrid-stuckelberger-a-pandemic-of-lies/

Let’s just save that image for when Bill Gates’ friends finally take down that article.

Here is the relevant section:


Stuckelberger also underscored that the “WHO is not the same organization as before”. There was a change in 2016, she explained.

“It was special: Organizations such as GAVI – the Global Alliance for Vaccine Immunization led by Bill Gates – they came to WHO in 2006 with funding. Since then, the WHO has developed into a new type of international organization. GAVI gained more and more influence, and total immunity, more than the diplomats in the UN. GAVI can do exactly what they want, the police can do nothing.”

The WHO underwent an audit in 2014 and after that, it became more like a company with countries as its subsidiaries.

“When I worked with international relations in the WHO in 2013, I saw that GAVI came in more and more. GAVI presented a global action plan for vaccination 2012-2020. That is, eight years where GAVI had everything in their hands. Bill Gates handled the vaccination, he took over.”

The WHO wields enormous power over countries, she said. “Before, all countries were free. But now, when I do interviews around the world, I see that each country is part of a ‘WHO company’. WHO is no longer a democratic member organization, like the UN. The various governments form the basis of the ‘enterprise’. It logically agrees with what is happening now, since the ‘companies’ want money, business, and to control people. It’s like slavery. The taxes we pay, they go to governments that are subject to ‘the company’. Under the multinational organizations, such as GAVI.”

“GAVI, the World Bank and the WHO entered into a contract called IFFM: International Facility Finance for Immunization. Our countries, our people, pay to the WHO, the World Bank and GAVI to carry out their immunization programs. Which means vaccinating the entire population. When you see the plan from GAVI, you see that from 2012 to 2020 they have had this as a goal. But then it did not work, they had to create a pandemic.”

She said the pandemic was most certainly planned. ” You can see this from all the documents. Everyone can analyze them, they are in the open, right in front of our eyes.”


I urge you to read more – if not now, then later.

LINK: https://uncanceled.news/former-who-employee-dr-astrid-stuckelberger-a-pandemic-of-lies/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/HS15K


GAVI is only ONE of Bill Gates’ “hidden hand” organizations, by which he gets TWO TOP VOTES on any council or advisory board. GAVI allows Bill Gates to control a putative solution – vaccines.

There is another organization called CEPICoalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations – by which Bill Gates controls the PROBLEM for which VACCINES are allegedly the answer.

Note that Bill Gates is controlling both the problem and the solution – and if the solution CAUSES THE PROBLEM, then he has just achieved what he needs as the basis for a cyclic, sustainable grift.

Do you see how CEPI – about epidemics – is only pointing toward one solution – vaccines?

Subtle, but learn to be a grift-catcher, and it just jumps out at you.

Let’s take a closer look at CEPI.

Quite obviously, CEPI was all over Event 201 – although the SPONSORS were slightly different.

See how that works? SELF-DEALING. Gates is an absolute expert at it. He controls VACCINES, and he controls EPIDEMICS. The PROBLEM, and the “SOLUTION” – which, if one tells the big lie just right – can CAUSE THE PROBLEM TO LAST FOREVER.

It’s CYCLIC, and it’s SUSTAINABLE, and it’s the same GRIFT PRINCIPLE as the wrap-up smear, where one hand claims that the other hand is the “news source”.

See how the control arises? Read that bit about CEPI. “Collaboration with regulators”? What do you THINK is going to happen? Same thing. Eventually, it’s all one side, and there are no checks and balances.

Gates is such a sharp operator. SO much sharper than the chumps he fools.

But there is HOPE in THE TRUTH – and Gates’ organization DID produce a TRUTH-TELLER.


Why BAD VACCINES are Worse Than NO VACCINES and Why We Need to STOP MASS-VACCINATION

When I heard a vaccine expert – a veteran of GAVI – namely Geert Vanden Bossche – saying that vaccinating into the pandemic was a BAD IDEA, well THAT is when my ears perked up, WOLF-QUICK.

Take note of the fact that this guy IS NOT and never was the HEAD of GAVI. He was NEVER one of their top clowns. He just worked for them. The head of GAVI can NEVER say anything like this – something that doesn’t back up Bill Gates 100%.

But this guy Vanden Bossche, who worked in vaccines his whole life, including for Bill Gates’ own organization GAVI, has expert knowledge that Bill Gates is pushing the wrong solution in our current situation.

Well, THAT is interesting.

Now – listen to Vanden Bossche talk about VARIANTS and vaccinating CHILDREN, when Gates and “other organizations” (COUGH, COUGH) started pushing THAT.

Remember – this video is JUNE 1, 2021. Everything Geert said has come true with Delta, and it coming true AGAIN with Omicron, as he predicted. This guy understood directed evolution of variants from the very beginning, and how those variants are why we have to STOP VACCINATING.

There are other people – on Biden’s scientific advisory board – who also understand directed evolution of variants. The question is, what are they doing with that knowledge? Are they causing the problem? Or are they even looking at the solution? We’ll get to that later.

Also – just a warning – Geert speaks ANNOYINGLY SLOWLY – but also EXTREMELY CLEARLY.

This is a 10-minute video that takes 35 minutes to get out, but there is NO MISTAKING what he says.

So – was Geert right?


LINK: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/14/scientists-identify-young-vaccinated-people-as-source-for-omicron-variant/

Let’s bust out that tweet.

It’s behind a paywall, but this much shows through:

“Data from Denmark shows that just over 70 per cent of omicron cases have been among those younger than 40.”

If you now go back and listen to Geert, starting at around 28 minutes, and from there to the end of the video, you will see that he predicted exactly what is happening – that the disease under pressure of the bad vaccines would mutate and move into the [generally] unvaccinated younger people – AND – and this is important – that VACCINATING THEM WITH THE CURRENT SUB-OPTIMAL VACCINES IS THE EXACT WRONG THING TO DO.

Why?

BECAUSE IT WILL MAKE THINGS EVEN WORSE.

Oh.

And he explains HOW it will be worse. It could be as bad as a Marek’s disease scenario.

This is what people are NOT GETTING – that the current vaccines are NOT GOOD ENOUGH, and that they are CAUSING MORE PROBLEMS THAN THEY SOLVE.

That’s GREAT if you have a GRIFT that depends on the bad vaccines. It’s NOT SO GREAT if you’re somebody who actually cares about SOLVING problems (plural).

You know – like not making a new problem worse than the old one, and covering it up.

NOW – lo and behold – Joe Biden actually has two people advising him, on his board of science and technology advisers, who should care DEEPLY about this problem – if they actually ARE still scientists, and not pawns of industry and government.

Let’s meet them.


The Genetics and Evolution Girls Currently Advising Joe Biden

I kinda stumbled onto this story.

I was over on The National Pulse, looking at a link which ForGodandCountry gave me, when I found ANOTHER story in the sidebar.

LINK: https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/pfizer-board-member-is-former-facebook-director/

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/T7tX2

Oh, the BOARDROOM INCEST gets better than that. That’s not even the beginning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sue_Desmond-Hellmann

This woman is the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Advising Joe Biden.

FTA:

Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellmann – a member of Pfizer Inc.’s Board of Directors – previously served as the Lead Independent Director at social media giant Facebook. The site has routinely censored posts relating to COVID-19 vaccines, with Pfizer in particular eliciting support from major corporate outlets.

Hellman was appointed to the social media platform’s board in March 2013 and served as it Lead Independent Director from June 2015 until October 30th 2019, shortly before the first reported case of COVID-19.

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook founder and CEO, said “Sue has been a wonderful and thoughtful voice on the board for six years, and I’m personally grateful to her for everything she has done for this company” in response to her departure.

“I remain positive about Facebook and the mission to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. Facebook’s Shareholders require a Board of Directors that is fully engaged and committed to address the critical issues confronting Facebook at this time,” Hellmann explained in reference to her role as the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

“Unfortunately, increasing demands from my CEO role, my extended family, and my own health make it no longer possible for me to commit the necessary time and energy required to properly serve Facebook and its shareholders,” she added in a public statement despite joining Pfizers board in 2020.

Amidst Hellmann’s tenure on the Pfizer board, Facebook has initiated campaigns to censor COVID-19 vaccine skeptics, as leaked internal documents from the company reveal algorithms aimed at “drastically reduc[ing] user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments.”


And much more.

Here is SOME of what I said to FG&C:


She links, at the highest levels:

Facebook
Pfizer
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Genentech
U.C. San. Fran.
U.C. Berkeley
AIDS research in Uganda
Rockefeller Foundation
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Federal Reserve Bank of San Fran
Global Health 2030

She’s behind a data initiative that basically reports individual patient data back to researchers to “accelerate research and learning blah-blah-blah”.

From Wikipedia:

Precision medicine based on Google Maps

In 2011, Desmond-Hellmann co-chaired a National Academy of Sciences committee that recommended creating a Google Maps-like data network aimed at developing more diagnostics and treatments tailored to individual patients — a concept known as “precision medicine”.[12] The so-called “knowledge network” would integrate the wealth of data emerging on the molecular basis of disease with information on environmental factors and patients’ electronic medical records and would allow scientists to share emerging research findings faster, thereby accelerating the development of tailored treatments. It also would allow clinicians to make more informed decisions about treatments, reduce health care costs and ultimately improve care.[13] The NAS report, titled “Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease”, was described by Keith Yamamoto, Vice Chancellor for Research at UCSF, as “the most important National Academy of Sciences Framework Analysis since that advisory body recommended that the United States go forward with the Human Genome Project”.[14]

In 2021, Desmond-Hellmann was appointed by President Joe Biden to the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), co-chaired by Frances Arnold, Eric Lander and Maria Zuber.


So – as a SIDEBAR – this woman was involved in the “freeing up” of electronic medical information which has basically DESTROYED medical privacy.

Which was GREAT for Democrat trial lawyers, by the way. Just today I got a call from AMBULANCE CHASERS based on a “confidential” diagnosis (nothing bad – don’t worry) that just went into my electronic records a few weeks ago.

I was SHOCKED that these people came on to me. It’s like Obamacare knifing my doctor in the back. The only way they knew, was access to my medical records. It should be absolutely illegal as hell for anybody – much less Democrat ambulance chasers – to know about that rare diagnosis and actually cold-call me to try to stir up a case. But yeah – destroying medical privacy in the name of helping researchers like her – that is just one example – a small example – of how “Inception” by the bad guys works. Find a smart dupe and get them to pimp an idea you need. Maybe even make them THINK they thought of it.

Free up the data with the EXCUSE of the good guys getting it, so that the BAD GUYS can do all kinds of things with it.

I know all about this – about being used as a PROXY to advance an idea because that proxy has respect as a scientist. It’s a nasty game.

Anyway….. [end of sidebar]


I am NOT of the opinion that this woman is as bad as someone like – say – Bill Gates. But I AM of the opinion that she’s very likely a politically correct “reliable board skirt” who always votes the way people are SUPPOSED to vote on board decisions. She’s Bilderberg fodder. She’s SMART and she GETS IT DONE. But she always does the “right thing” – the expected thing – the thing that somebody with more power and more control wants done.

So THIS woman is NEVER going to tell Joe Biden what Bill Gates doesn’t want him to hear.

But if there is any wonder why Joe Biden keeps trying to mandate vaccines, yeah, it’s because one of his science advisors is the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Pretty convenient.

Now – let’s move on to the other gal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Arnold

THIS ONE will not only understand what Geert Vanden Bossche is saying – she may actually respect that wisdom.


Frances Hamilton Arnold (born July 25, 1956)[1] is an American chemical engineer and Nobel Laureate. She is the Linus Pauling Professor of Chemical Engineering, Bioengineering and Biochemistry at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech). In 2018, she was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for pioneering the use of directed evolution to engineer enzymes.[2]

Since January 2021, she serves as an external co-chair of President Joe Biden‘s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST).[3]


So – THREE important points about Frances Arnold:

  • Pioneered the use of “pushed” evolution of organisms in the lab to make them useful
  • Nobel Prize winner
  • co-chair of Joe Biden’s “board” of science and technology advisors

So what’s up with this “directed evolution”?

From Wikipedia…..


Arnold is credited with pioneering the use of directed evolution to create enzymes (biochemical molecules—often proteins—that catalyze, or speed up, chemical reactions) with improved and/or novel functions.[25] The directed evolution strategy involves iterative rounds of mutagenesis and screening for proteins with improved functions and it has been used to create useful biological systems, including enzymesmetabolic pathwaysgenetic regulatory circuits, and organisms. In nature, evolution by natural selection can lead to proteins (including enzymes) well-suited to carry out biological tasks, but natural selection can only act on existing sequence variations (mutations) and typically occurs over long time periods.[26] Arnold speeds up the process by introducing mutations in the underlying sequences of proteins; she then tests these mutations’ effects. If a mutation improves the proteins’ function she can keep iterating the process to optimize it further. This strategy has broad implications because it can be used to design proteins for a wide variety of applications.[27] For example, she has used directed evolution to design enzymes that can be used to produce renewable fuels and pharmaceutical compounds with less harm to the environment.[25]

One advantage of directed evolution is that the mutations do not have to be completely random; instead, they can be random enough to discover unexplored potential, but not so random as to be inefficient. The number of possible mutation combinations is astronomical, but instead of just randomly trying to test as many as possible, she integrates her knowledge of biochemistry to narrow down the options, focusing on introducing mutations in areas of the protein that are likely to have the most positive effect on activity and avoiding areas in which mutations would likely be, at best, neutral and at worst, detrimental (such as disrupting proper protein folding).[25]


So – there you have it – “mutagenesis and screening“. In a way, it’s still just breeding horses or labradoodles, but much more technical and scientific.

If you suddenly think that, “Hey, this sounds a lot like what Fauci, Baric, Daszak and Bat Lady were doing” – you know – gain of function – well, that’s precisely it.

And think about this.

The SPIKE PROTEIN is a protein just like an ENZYME is protein. The only difference there, is that FAUCI and his gang were controlling the “directed evolution” of viruses making proteins toward whatever goals THEY thought useful, whereas Arnold was controlling the “directed evolution” of bacteria making proteins toward whatever goals SHE thought useful.

I remember when Arnold’s work was frequently showcased in Chemical & Engineering News. Yeah, a lot of it was feminist championing of a woman scientist by the C&EN media leftoids – BUT the fact is that Arnold’s work was very interesting stuff, and her interests and abilities always struck me as authentic – that she was NOT a “manufactured” science celebrity. She was showcased more than created.

One can argue about whether she deserved to be Beast-marked by the Dynamite Prize or not. Doesn’t really matter. To borrow from Trump, “Knowledge is the prize.”

In principle, this lady is capable of understanding and RESPECTING Geert Vanden Bossche’s arguments. If she’s going to disagree with him HONESTLY, then it will be for good reasons.

But that’s not the end of the story.

Let’s talk mutagenesis.


Remdesivir and Molnupiravir as Mutagens

Now I’m not saying that ALL of these new COVID drugs are human mutagens or teratogens. In fact, most likely, NONE of them are. The Pfizer drug is not a mutagen as far as I know – but then that drug is actually a binary drug, and one of THOSE two drugs is an established AIDS drug, which is quite fishy in light of VAIDS.

What I am saying is that TWO of these drugs are PROVEN viral mutagens.

Sorta like that critical step in Frances Arnold’s work.

So are we trying to ACCELERATE the appearance of variants? Are we consciously trying to CHANGE how or how fast they vary? Is SOMEBODY consciously trying to change how or how fast they vary?

Here is where I talked about the apparent public health contradiction of using drugs like molnupiravir and remdesivir on a virus which mutates into “variants of concern” before:


The Molnupiravir Contradiction

Why would we mass treat a virus with a drug which forces the virus to mutate, when mutation is how the virus creates new variants that reinfect the vaccinated? Before I explain the title contradiction, let me start with an admission. Most of my life, I have been very friendly with the pharmaceutical industry. I …


In that blog post, I explained that (1) remdesivir has been PROVEN to “push” SARS-CoV-2 toward evolution of variants, including “variants of concern”, and (2) molnupiravir works on the principle of “mutation catastrophe” in the SARS-CoV-2 reproductive process, so it likely does the same thing even more.

So are we “doing the Arnold” or what?

I will leave that up to others to answer.

Let me close instead with one more great article which summarizes where we are.

It’s Vanden Bossche without Vanden Bossche.


Eugyppius & The Conservation of Corona

If you have not found this anonymous German dude’s substack account, you need to be watching it. It’s almost better than Alex Berenson’s account, which is a pretty hard thing to do.

Among several great posts, this one is critical.

Let me just quote the first few paragraphs.

FTA:

The ascendancy of more transmissible (and possibly also more pathogenic) Delta strains is a consequence of the worldwide vaccination campaign. This is now the most salient and the most important side-effect of our vaccines. They elicit antibodies that select for more aggressive SARS-2 lineages, which escape vaccine-induced immunity by replicating in the lungs of infected people faster and earlier.

All our evidence is that the alpha (Kent) and delta (Indian) lineages emerged at the same time, in September or October 2020. Delta was more aggressive than alpha, but alpha had the upper hand until vaccines killed it off. Probably, Delta is too aggressive in completely unvaccinated populations, causing severe illness before very many of its hosts can do much spreading.

Consider the entirely typical case of my country, Germany. Most first doses here were administered over the course of nine weeks, from early April to early July. In precisely this period, Delta began its rise to absolute dominance. The genetic diversity of SARS-2 has been totally destroyed in Germany and everywhere else too.

What you see happening to Alpha in this chart, is what the vaccines were supposed to do to Corona as a whole. But then it was Corona’s move, and Delta is the hand it played.

Nothing about how the pandemic plays out now can be disentangled from the vaccines. The more aggressive spread of Delta among the unvaccinated is as much a part of this campaign, as its continued spread among the vaccinated. We have totally changed the environment in which SARS-2 circulates, and in response SARS-2 has become more transmissible and more volatile across the board.

MORE: https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/the-conservation-of-corona

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/vhrEk


SO – have I convinced you of the obvious? I’m convinced.

DA RONA-COASTA IS POWAHED BY DA VAXX.

It’s bloody obvious.

So are they incompetent or evil? Or maybe both?

Your call. I’m just watching from the cheap seats.

And getting ready for the Biden Depression.

Cheers, Eugyppius and Geert. You guys get da Woof Prize.

W

Ten Fresh Reasons for You, Your Friends, and Your Loved Ones to NOT Get the HAXXINE

Here we go.


https://futurism.com/neoscope/potential-covid19-vaccine-hacks-dna-build-immunity

10. It’s a “Haxxine”

A lot of people say that “it’s not a vaccine”, and while I actually LIKE the fact that the CDC – for BAD REASONS – made a GOOD CHANGE (in my opinion) in the definition of vaccines, I am forced to admit that the CDC DEMOCRATS did the KNAVISH DEMOCRAT THING and “changed the rules”, which Democrats always do, instead of confronting the badness of the bad vaccines they want to force on everybody, and thus are stupidly committed to defending.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm

Note that the CDC definition change ALLOWS me to call these things BAD VACCINES, because the new definition allows both qualitative and quantitative expectations on vaccine performance.

But I am going beyond just calling them bad vaccines. I did a knavish thing back, and created (possibly for the second or third time – who knows?) a NEW NAME that can be used to distinguish mRNA virus-like particle and cDNA viral vector “vaccines” from the much more standard and understood protein and glycoprotein antigen vaccines which would have VERY LIKELY been much safer and more trustworthy than the vaccines we got.

THUS – I’m calling these things “haxxines” – precisely because they are GENETIC HACKS. One can easily call them “genetic vaccines”, but by calling them “genetic hacks”, “haccines”, or most especially “haxxines“, one gets to the root problem, from the view of scientists and programmers. These things are FAST HACKS – they’re untried methods – unproven experimental fixes – and more than that, they are LITERALLY “genetic hacks”.

You’ve heard of “life hacks”, so you know what I’m talking about.

“Hacks” tend to have a kind of “go with the flow” and “uncontrolled outcome” quality, which creates simplicity and elegance in the overall method, but the downsides of “premature ability” and “unforeseen but expectable consequences” loom VERY large.

In other words, “hacks” give Jimmy Olson the Superman abilities he probably shouldn’t have right now, and bad things can and do result.

There is NO WAY around the truth of things. These vaccines are GENETIC HACKS. I look at the methodology of what was done, and what Pfizer and Moderna are HIDING, and I can tell.

HACKS!!!

Now, “hacking” is how a lot of things are “tried and discovered” in science and programming. I am as guilty as any other scientist or programmer of having PROUDLY developed many beautiful hacks that saved people lots of time, money, and effort. Some of those hacks are still in use, because over time they gained trust and certainty. Vaccination ITSELF is a beautiful HACK that saved millions of lives. The easy cases – stuff like rabies and smallpox – are particularly awesome results.

Hell – IVERMECTIN IS A HUGE HACK!

It’s a great hack! It’s an awesome hack, because one of the HACKED ELEMENTS is that the therapeutic margin is INSANELY LARGE. The hack isn’t GREAT, but the hack can’t screw up!

These kinds of “safe hacks” rarely come along. Ivermectin is so awesome precisely because it’s an antiviral HACK.

SO – don’t consider this as much “anti-vaccine” as PRO-TRUTH. These hacky vaccines are hacky as hell, and absolutely UN-MANDATABLE, in my opinion as a scientist. Mandating a HACK is almost always STUPID. But almost all hacks lead to something good, if you TREAT THE DAMN THING AS A HACK.

“Haxxines”. Be careful with the damn things. They’re HACKY. Are you sure you want to take one? Not me. These don’t look like a “great hack”. They look like a BAD HACK that’s gonna need a lot of fixing.

And I say that as somebody who had to FIX a lot of other people’s HACKS.

OK? Good.


9. Stillbirths and Miscarriages

The Gateway Pundit reminds us that there appears to be a HUGE jump in miscarriages, stillbirths, and “uterine dumps” after the haxxine. It’s NOT just obvious in the VAERS data – the facts are slipping out thanks to honest healthcare workers.

The HORROR is that most hospital administrations seem to be hiding the numbers.

(VIDEO) Doctor Warns Stillbirths Are Rampant Among Fully Vaccinated Mothers, Launches Investigation

December 11, 2021, 12:00 pm
by Alicia Powe

You have to click on this link above and look at the numbers. They’re shocking even to non-scientists, but to a scientist, this SHOULD be obvious as hell.

Look – I’m going to be very straight with you. The numbers are absolutely scary, because they are “anecdotal but precise and outside the range where any kind of error matters”. These are very often “two or more orders of magnitude things”. If you don’t see them, you’re bloody blind, or trying very hard not to see them.

If this happened for any other reason than the vaccine – something like “water pollution” or a “serial killer nurse in hospitals”, the authorities in Canada where this was documented would be FREAKING. But let’s be real – because if it’s the haxxine, it’s THEIR POLICY, and so suddenly they act like they don’t know what’s going on.

And the media just goes along with the insane pretense of ignorance.

What we’re talking about is a situation where numbers of stillbirths jumped by TWO ORDERS of magnitude – from less than ten to nearly 100 in the same timeframe – AND we have a likely suspect that OTHER evidence supports.

Scientifically, it’s a NO DAMN BRAINER.

  • The numbers are STARK and MASSIVE
  • The number one suspect MUST BE vaccination
  • The haxxine has demonstrated proper suspect actions
  • The haxxine has awesome explanatory mechanisms
  • The haxxine makers HID THE EXPLANATORY DATA
  • The haxxine makers have been caught hiding and lying before

This is not hard. This is where the audience SCREAMS AT COLUMBO. And they scream at Columbo, because he’s still playing dumb, and hasn’t yet pointed his good eye at the suspect, and his cigar at the roof, and said “One more thing, Mrs. Psaki.”

I cannot for the life of me understand why the CDC/FDA/DNC complex is MANDATING a bad vaccine for a COLD – a vaccine that so obviously causes stillbirths – unless that’s the plan.

Well, we know Democrats like abortion, and they like contraception, and this vaccine is a bit like a lottery halfway between them, and – damn, Mrs. Psaki – THAT SURE MAKES SENSE.

Don’t take the haxxine if you’re pregnant, or ever planning to get pregnant. Just don’t. It’s just stupid.

OK?

Something is VERY WRONG with this vaccine, and just because the people who would be hurt by the admission won’t admit it, doesn’t mean there isn’t something very wrong with the vaccine.

I mean haxxine.


8. Your Kid Could Get a “Toxic Batch” of the Pfizer Vaccine.

If you’re thinking of vaccinating your kids, you need to be aware of the fact that the Pfizer vaccine for kids appears to have a “toxic batch problem” very similar to the adult vaccine.

Not only is the number of adverse outcome events in children absolutely unacceptable, in my opinion – there seems to be a systematic problem with the vaccine which has NOT been identified.

I definitely recommend reading THIS article.

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/12/medicine-regulators-harming-children-with-dangerous-batches-of-covid-vaccine/

Now, I’m going to be completely blunt here. IGNORING all of the possibilities of long-term damage, like myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke, sterility, etc., and JUST looking at “immediate reactions to the Pfizer COVID vaccine”, and then comparing THOSE reactions to most childhood vaccines, which are absolutely DWARFED in VAERS by the Pfizer numbers, I don’t think there is any way that I would vaccinate a young child, older child, teen or young adult with this vaccine.

It’s just POINTLESS. The risks from the disease itself to those cohorts are absolutely minuscule and mild, but the risks from the vaccine are definite and serious – and FAR WORSE than EVERY other vaccine. In fact, they’re far worse than historic bad vaccines that got withdrawn.

It is STUPID to vaccinate your kid – particularly just because DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS say so. They don’t have good reasons – they’re just “order-followers” like Nazis. And if you can’t see THAT – well, think what that means. Are YOU a stupid “order-following” Nazi?

I simply find it stupid to take needless risks like this – that don’t even offer FUN as a reward. Buy your kid a higher-quality bicycle helmet. Teach them how to swim. Take them hiking and climbing and skating. There are thousands of stupid fun things that still make sense. This vaccine does not.

It makes sense for Pfizer and the politicians it bribes. That’s about it.


7. Original Antigenic Sin is a Real and Very Serious Reason to Stop Vaccinating Everyone

That is actually the title of a very interesting substack blog post explaining TWO recent scientific papers. You can find links to the papers in the blog post.

LINK: https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/original-antigenic-sin-is-a-real

ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/Ivs6f

This excellent post spends most of its effort explaining the papers, which largely show how prior antibody immunity to ANY human coronavirus other than the particular strain in question, tends to HURT immunity to the ONE in question.

Basically, prior coronavirus exposure MISLEADS antibody response to later coronavirus infection.

Thus, the idea of “original antigenic sin” is that what your immune system initially “imprints” on, will determine what it does later, and if it imprints on the wrong thing, it will lead to wrong responses.

What this tells us, is that natural immunity which does NOT use OLD PLAYBOOKS is what wins against coronaviruses, but the VACCINES are always OLD SPECIFIC PLAYBOOKS, and therefore not very good.

Here is the author, eugyppius.


FTA:

The severity of Corona infection varies wildly across the population. Children have generally mild or asymptomatic infections, while adults have a wide range of responses. Everyone always assumed that cross-immunity was part of the answer to this conundrum. The problem is that – at least as far as antibodies go – it is shaping up to be a not very reassuring part of that answer. The innate and non-specific immune response of children looks more and more like a big part of the reason they are spared severe infection. Adults with immune systems tightly calibrated to the common human coronaviruses, meanwhile, often have more severe symptoms. They suffer from Original Antigenic Sin.

Over 4.2 billion people across the earth have received at least one dose of vaccine against SARS-2. The majority of these vaccines have elicited antibodies only against an early form of the spike protein that is no longer in circulation.

This would seem to be one reason why many western countries with high vaccination rates appear to have locked themselves into an indefinite phase of heightened SARS-2 transmission. In the United Kingdom, 96% of adults have antibodies to the spike protein – most of these first acquired by vaccination. Shortly after they concluded their vaccination campaign, cases skyrocketed, and they have remained high ever since.

Original Antigenic Sin is a real phenomenon. It seems not only to permanently influence the immune response to the spike protein itself, but also to inhibit the development of antibodies to other SARS-2 proteins. A worst case scenario, would be a future spike mutation that entirely escapes the anti-spike antibodies elicited by our vaccines. In this case, it seems possible that many vaccinated people will be stuck with permanently suboptimal immune responses. If Omicron is indeed circulating primarily among the vaccinated, as some data suggests, this would seem to be one possibly reason why. These concerns are particularly acute in the case of children, who may well be exposed to the risk of very serious illness in the future, if vaccination permanently misdirects their immune system.


Wolf again.

“Misdirection” is the word we are looking for here. This allows us to go beyond the idea of “original antigenic sin”, to expand the idea to “subsequent antigenic sin”.

EVERY exposure from birth to death – vaccine, infectious disease, or natural (sub-infective) – has the potential to mislead our immune systems in later exposures, and there is no reason to think that Fauci or Big Pharma are going to come up with vaccines that are going to “lead smarter” than our highly evolved natural immune systems, in my scientific opinion.

Basically, it’s as if coronaviruses are excellent attacking boxers which (by evolutionary memory) remember the jabs and punches that “got through” before, and if you waste energy making any of those old moves, you will be “rope-a-doped” by the coronavirus.

Thus, like the viruses, WE have “evolved memory” of how to combat shape-shifters, with our own shape-shifting response, which looks for NEW ATTACKS – not old ones.

What this says to me is that Fauci’s “yesterday’s news” antibody-based vaccine strategy is COMPLETELY WRONG.

One of the things I’ve noticed is Fauci’s reluctance to move on from Original Wuhan vaccines. Yes, we drop our jaws at the mere MENTION of vaccines “tailored” to newer variants, and I totally get the idea of warning about the Fauci “rona-coaster”. I absolutely agree that Fauci is dangling that clearly-planned strategy in front of us as a future narrative talking point.

LINK: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/08/whoot-there-it-is-anthony-fauci-says-we-are-prepared-to-start-delivering-variant-specific-booster-vaccines/

BUT – at the same time – Fauci seems really intent on pushing vaccination with permanently and massively sub-optimal out-of-date vaccines, which are definitely MISLEADING our immune systems.

Thus, it strikes me that Fauci is trying to get the “worst of both worlds”. He’s not treating GOOD, HIGHLY CURRENT vaccine specificity with the seriousness it deserves. Rather, he is trying to MILK the bad, delta-failing vaccines for all they’re worth.

Something is WRONG here. I think a lot of it has to do with Fauci’s “funding-centric” view of public health. I think he has a distorted set of priorities, based on the extreme compromises that he has made with the industry. It explains remdesivir, and it explains these bad, out-of-date vaccines.

But the bottom line is this. There is clearly more here than Fauci understands, and mandating these CONFIRMED immunity-misleading vaccines over natural immunity is wrong, and possibly – quite possibly – a kind of murderous hubris.


6. The Haxxines Appear to Offer No Benefit When Viewed from All-Cause Mortality

This is a subtle point, but it’s a very effective argument with me, because it does not let anything escape. No matter how hidden the effects – positive or negative – of the vaccines, in the end, all-cause mortality numbers that don’t shift tell me that the vaccines simply aren’t working as a public health policy.

LINK: https://beckernews.com/exclusive-its-game-over-for-the-cdc-if-these-death-rates-hold-true-43385/

People are very likely trading some slight improvement in risk of death from COVID, for some slight increase in risk of death from haxxine side effects.

Overall? They’re just not doing much good.

No thanks. Not worth it. Demand BETTER VACCINES. Or maybe even a different solution.


5. Vaccination Against Wuhan Made People More Susceptible to Infection by Beta, Gamma, and Delta (But Not Alpha) Variants in the Netherlands

I’m just reporting the study, which is BLUNT evidence of “vaccine-enhanced infection”, a.k.a. VEI.

We will talk more about VEI below, and where it may come from.

TITLE: Increased risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 Beta, Gamma, and Delta variant compared to Alpha variant in vaccinated individuals

LINK: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.24.21266735v1.full-text

ABSTRACT: The extent to which severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC) break through infection- or vaccine-induced immunity is not well understood. Here, we analyze 28,578 sequenced SARS-CoV-2 samples from individuals with known immune status obtained through national community testing in the Netherlands from March to August 2021. We find evidence for an increased risk of infection by the Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), or Delta (B.1.617.2) variants compared to the Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant after vaccination. No clear differences were found between vaccines. However, the effect was larger in the first 14-59 days after complete vaccination compared to 60 days and longer. In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with Beta, Gamma or Delta variants relative to Alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity.

I want to emphasize that last sentence:

In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with Beta, Gamma or Delta variants relative to Alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity.

So, according to this, I made the right choice, not getting vaccinated, in terms of resisting infection with the delta variant. Delta eventually got me, but it likely would have gotten me SOONER if I’d gotten the vaccine – at least that is the prediction I would make based on the results of this study.

Hmmmmmm.


4. Childhood Deaths are Going Up Since They Started Getting The Haxxine

I want to scream “XXXXING MURDERERS”, but I will resist. For now.

TITLE: Deaths among Children are 44% higher than the 5-year-average since they were offered the Covid-19 Vaccine according to ONS data

LINK: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/24/child-deaths-increasing-since-offered-covid-vaccine/

Yeah, it’s not PROOF, but GOOD GRIEF – it’s one of the most dangerous “correlations that looks a hell of a lot like causation” that I’ve seen in a while.

What if Trump was right, and kids should not be getting this vaccine?

Mandating it? OBVIOUSLY wrong.

I would say this is close to the point where non-violent solutions not only run out of justification, but may in fact be viewed as collaboration with evil.

This is where Christ turns into a “chucker of millstones like asteroids”. This ain’t “smiley Jesus” stuff.

Something is VERY wrong with not only our criminal DOJ, but even with our alleged “white hats” if they’re protecting this shit, worse still, mandating it.


3. COVID Recoverees Are Statistically Better Off Avoiding the Jabs

Karl Denninger was all over this one. Title: “Debate Is Over Folks; Facts Came In”.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244442

I will start by briefly summarizing what Karl ends up saying, which is complicated (you will see).

Karl looked at the pre-print of a HUGE scientific study in Israel.

The title of the study is “Protection and waning of natural and hybrid COVID-19 immunity“.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.04.21267114v1.full.pdf

There will likely be a lot of arguments over what the results mean, and they will depend upon what your “metrics of success” are.

Karl is of the same opinion as me, that ONLY SEVERE OUTCOMES MATTER with COVID-19. If you get sick and recover, and don’t die or go to the hospital, it’s all OK. Even better if you get good immunity which staves off the NEXT illness out of the deal.

Based on that opinion, the results here would argue that OLDER people who have already gotten the disease, are better off NOT GETTING THE VACCINE, in order to avoid severe outcomes.

I mean haxxine. Whatever.

You will have lower risks if you just stay on the natural immunity track. This is what I figured from all the early studies of COVID-19. It is part of my caution toward vaccines which were explicitly NOT TESTED on recoverees, who were REMOVED from the study populations by the drug companies.

The data is complex and it’s easy to slice it different ways. Here is Karl’s take:


FTA

To summarize:

  • Natural immunity is more-protective than vaccination and not a little either.  It is more than double the effective protection beyond the first two months after being vaccinated.  In other words being jabbed not only is a poor second choice in terms of generating immunity it cannot be considered comparable in any way.
  • In the younger cohorts being jabbed beats being recovered for severe outcomes if you get infected.  But when adjusted for odds of infection it loses, badly, beyond the first two months.  This is very important because the odds of a severe outcome for a young person are quite low in the first place.  In short there is a clean argument that a young person, due to the decay of immunity from the jabs, is better off being infected as their immunity is more-durable and on an infection-risk adjusted basis if previously infected they are less-likely, by quite a lot, to have a severe outcome on a second encounter.  This of course ignores early treatment that may reduce severe outcome risk — which nobody who is other than desirous of a large body count would ignore.  We haven’t ignored early treatment on purpose have we?
  • While it is is true that being jabbed after or before infection does indeed reduce the risk of being infected with a third immunity-generating event if you do get infected it has demonstrated negative effectiveness in the recovered cohort when it comes to severe outcomes.  It will be very interesting to see how this plays as time goes on because many of these infections occurred quite-recently with Delta and given the known much slower decay of immunity from infection than vaccination there is a confounding factor that, in combination with the low event count, leaves us with a jury that is still out in this specific case.
  • Given that vaccination after infection increases the risk of severe outcomes over someone with natural immunity if you get a second infection being vaccinated after infection is likely harmful, and not a little either.  Getting infected again after infection and then vaccination is a third immunity-generating event.  There is no data on this via the natural route (that is, infected, recovered, infected again and recovered, and then infected a third time.)  Given the deterioration in protection from severe outcome if infected after recovery and then vaccination, which is quite significant for all except the youngest cohort, it is likely that being infected twice not only produces superior resistance to infection it also avoids the severe outcome risk increase.

Note that none of this includes the risk from the jabs themselves.  To the mortality and morbidity (“severe” outcomes) you must also add that which comes directly from the medication, since no drug is ever without said risks.

What is clear is that natural immunity is superior both in terms of protection from repeat infection and from severe outcomes. In addition being boosted had negative or no effectiveness in preventing severe outcomes among everyone except those under 40, where there were too few events to get clean statistical evidence.  This implies that vaccinated immunity, when “refreshed”, does not alter the course of a breakthrough infection yet that was the remaining leg on which the argument rested, that it prevented severe outcomes.  That should be evident in the data with a significant decrease in severe outcomes across all cohorts and it is not.

What’s worse is that a third event (infection) after recovering and then being jabbed led to increases in severe disease risk if you got a breakthrough, and quite-materially so, over simple recovery.

This argues that jabbing a recovered person, while it may produce apparent superior resistance to infection, is in fact worthless or worse because when adjusted for the severe event risk the reinfection and severe outcome risk is actually HIGHER if you got vaccinated after being infected.

And finally this data also demonstrates that being infected after vaccination produces a materially faster immunity decay than infection alone which is solid evidence that vaccination in fact materially impairs the natural immunity process.  That is, aside from direct side effect risk it screws your natural immunity duration when, not if, you get infected after being vaccinated anyway.


WOLF again.

Denninger believes that the results indicate something called VEIvaccine-enhanced infection.

VEI is basically a broader category that includes ADE – antibody-dependent enhancement – but it doesn’t restrict the disease-enhancing mechanism to antibodies, even though in any complex mechanism, some sort of positive or negative failure by antibodies is almost assuredly involved. Thus, by REMOVING antibodies from the name, VEI prevents arguments from getting sidetracked as to exactly WHY the vaccines are enhancing subsequent infections. VEI means you gave a vaccine which made a subsequent infection WORSE. You can figure out why and whether it’s ADE later.

NOW – let me start off with a CRITICAL SIDEBAR on VEI and where it likely comes from.


FREAKY SIDEBAR ON VEI AND FAUCI’S DIRECT INVOLVEMENT IN ITS APPEARANCE IN BOTH COVID-19 AND VACCINES THEREOF

Denninger’s last point – that vaccination is shown here to “mess up” natural immunity to COVID – doesn’t even get into the very real likelihood that vaccination is ALSO messing up natural immunity to other diseases and possibly cancers. THAT is the stuff that Drs. Cole and Thompson have found in the jabbed. There’s more new evidence of VEI in scientific papers (shocking evidence, actually) which Denninger has covered elsewhere, but set that aside for later. It’s small potatoes compared to the following.

Decreased general immunity TO all diseases and cancers, CAUSED by both the disease and even more so by the vaccines, SEEMS to be one of the huge RISKS (and this actually happened) of having inserted sequences for HIV features into the spike protein during “Bat Woman’s” research, and then by necessity or not, sneakily / stupidly / cunningly, bringing those same features into the vaccines, which – bizarrely – is something that ANTHONY FAUCI apparently holds patents to.

And all of this stuff is related to things that Fauci and his buddies LIED ABOUT and DENIED.

And all of this stuff is stuff that “DRASTIC” missed by a mile, by strawmanning away from it. It’s obvious as hell now why DRASTIC was “supported” by CIA/WaPo, Twitter, and all the usual scoundrels. They’re the “Plan B” to hide Fauci’s and China’s and WEF’s murderous felonies, by “snopesing” us with an accidental misdemeanor that leaves out the more shocking horrors that bring down puppet governments.

Yes. You heard that right. Karen Kingston found this stuff. And I had to watch what she said FIVE TIMES to fully GRASP and ACCEPT what she is saying. I thought she might be exaggerating or leaving out something – some part of this. She’s not. The simple FACTS alone are SHOCKING.


SIDEBAR WITHIN A SIDEBAR

I don’t know if you ever saw the movie Impostor with Gary Sinise, which is based on a short story by Philip K. Dick, but my immediate reaction was the question “Is Anthony Fauci some kind of ‘impostor’ whose goal is to destroy humans on this planet?” I’m not kidding. That was my first thought. Because what he’s doing sure seems like a great way to attack intelligent life on this planet. Just sayin’.


OK – has your jaw dropped yet? Good. It should. I’ll just give you the links and the video. Stew Peters doesn’t really let Karen Kingston explain this in the detail it deserves, so she says things with a brevity that allows for unwarranted doubts to fester.

Karen Kingston needs an hour on OAN with somebody like me or Kirsch or Malone or Denninger to explain things, but she has a huge story here.

Fauci and his crew of science grifters consciously put HIV molecular features [which could, of course, risk HIV-like outcomes] into the spike protein of the more communicable and more dangerous disease, which risked exactly what we are experiencing with the disease, and they didn’t just do it knowingly (as you can READ FROM THE LITERATURE) – they took out patents on doing the same features in vaccines, which makes THEM riskier of the same dangers. And then of course they lied about all of that and tried to cover it up. And to top it off, they supposedly changed patent wording to include accidental and intentional releases for some kind of patentability reason, which makes me wonder what the hell is going on in the Patent Office as well.

And remember those Indian scientists at the beginning who spotted those four “HIV inserts”? Which Fauci and company forced the journal to retract? Yeah, that’s what we’re talking about. That science makes sense now. The evidence is now in VAERS. The evidence is in the patents. THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND THEN THEY LIED ABOUT IT AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.

What the HELL!!!

THIS IS THE GREATEST SCIENTIFIC SCANDAL IN HISTORY.

LINK: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/12/fauci-patent-vaxxed-induced-aids-biotech-analyst-hiv-glycoprotein-120-contained-in-vaxx/

LINK: https://rumble.com/vqhqop-fauci-patent-vaxxed-induced-aids-biotech-analyst-hiv-glycoprotein-120-conta.html

LINK: https://brandnewtube.com/watch/karen-kingston-fauci-patent-vaxxed-induced-aids-hiv-glycoprotein-120-contained-in-vaxx_r14CHFmoubcfHla.html

And oh, yeah, there is an Israeli study that shows worse outcomes in the vaccinated.

NEXT.


2. An Israeli In-Depth Study of a Breakthrough Exposure Outbreak Incident Showed Worse Outcomes For The Vaccinated

This is one that Denninger posted about EARLIER in relation to VEI. And unlike some cases where he hyperventilates, in this case, IMO, it’s MUCH WORSE than Denninger reported.

Going to the ACTUAL PAPERS – if you’re used to reading scientific papers – proved MORE SHOCKING than what Denninger said.

Denninger: Simply Put: It DOES NOT WORK

The Lancet: The epidemiological relevance of the COVID-19-vaccinated population is increasing

Israeli Letter: Nosocomial outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a highly vaccinated population, Israel, July 2021

If you look at this, what you see is that the people who were unvaccinated got off much better than the vaccinated. It’s VERY obvious. You can just read it for yourselves – any of those links.

Denninger is able to rant more. Start off with him.

In The Lancet, it’s just mentioned, but the authors are trying, as much as they can get away with in a controlled science press, to WARN people that it’s really a “pandemic of the vaccinated” now.

And in the original Israeli paper, they are also trying very CAREFULLY to warn people that it’s a WORSE PANDEMIC for the vaccinated.

And ALL OF THAT leads me to a BLOG POST where somebody named Herschel Smith spotted something very, very, very telling.

I had no idea WHY Pfizer was doing what they are doing, by not supplying their new COVID drug as a single compound, but rather in a FORCED combination with an AIDS drug.

Well, now THAT all makes sense.


1. Pfizer May Be Sneaking Ritonavir (AIDS Drug) into its COVID Pill To Cover Up Vaccine-Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (VAIDS)

I have no idea if the guy who wrote this blog post, which is ABOUT Denninger’s post on the Israeli letter, is the one who figured this out, or if he just read the idea somewhere else. All I know is that I absolutely think he’s right.

Herschel Smith: The Vaccines Make Everything Worse


FTA:

We’ve extensively discussed the damage the vaccine is doing to the immune system, the increased risk of cancer, the pericarditis, and the blood clots and hemorrhaging associated with the shots.  Put simply, its side effects are awful.  But before that is even considered, they simply don’t work.  This from Karl Denninger.

Oops….

In Israel a nosocomial outbreak was reported involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members. The source was a fully vaccinated COVID-19 patient. The vaccination rate was 96.2% among all exposed individuals (151 healthcare workers and 97 patients). Fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died, the two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease [[4]]

Not just oops, VEI.

Vaccine Enhanced Infections.

This is in The Lancet, a high-quality prestigious medical journal.

Except that I don’t think it’s oops.  I think all of this was intended.

See also this.  Israel is in real trouble with a veritable blizzard of sickness.  Make sure not to miss the fact that the new Pfizer Covid pill has HIV medication in it.

Not, of course, to treat the virus, but to treat the effects of the vaccine.

That’s quite a scam, yes?  Develop a shot that harms you for a disease your colleague (Fauci) developed, and then develop the drug that allegedly will make you better from the harm you perpetrated on people to begin with.


Wolf again.

Yes – the Pfizer drug PAXLOVID (good GRIEF – what focus group created THAT name?) includes both a COVID protease inhibitor, PF-07321332, and an older AIDS drug, ritonavir.

Now – Pfizer states a plausible reason to include the HIV drug ritonavir – namely to shut down liver metabolism to increase the concentration of the ACTUAL anti-COVID protease inhibitor PF-07321332.

But really, this just sounds like a paper-thin justification for administering an HIV drug to cover up the HIV-related consequences of the Pfizer vaccine, which stupidly incorporated all of the HIV problems of the Fauci-Wuhan-created SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which stupidly included all the problems of AIDS. Unless it’s not stupidly, but diabolically. Which is even worse. Bloody impostor!

It’s just more drugs, and MORE DRUGS, covering up one “error” with ONE MORE “ERROR”.

Or was this forseeable stuff ever an error to begin with? They KEEP DOING THE WRONG THING. OVER AND OVER. AGAIN AND AGAIN.

As you can see below, this hepatic shutdown action of ritonavir has a long list of potentially dire consequences, much like remdesivir, which is also basically a kidney and liver toxin.

I personally think this is all quite beyond suspicious as hell.

And after all of this crap, why that damned bureaucrat millionaire Fauci is still in his job is beyond me.


So there you have it.

Once you understand that they are selling the disease, the cure, and the cover-up, you can safely say that you want NONE OF THEM.

I want to see Anthony Fauci and Albert Bourla arrested and tried.

That’s what I want. We can talk about vaccines again after that happens.

Until that happens, I won’t take ’em. NOT A ONE.

W

DEAR KAG: 20211210

“If you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust.”

St. Thomas Aquinas

Wolf’s Pub is open for business! This public house is decked out in the Christmas spirit, and speaking of spirits, our special today is the Brandy Alexander. We’ll get to that in a moment.

ZELENKO ON A RIGHTEOUS RANT

Here is some more info on that Babylonish woman, Barbara Hubbard. Beware, there is a lot of gunk.

Didn’t that feel wonderful? I love that man. He is God’s instrument and a blunt one at that.

Here is another of God’s instruments, Ivermectin. The Story of Ivermectin just premiered last evening (FLCCC Alliance), and you can share this with normies:

https://youtu.be/OLxJUOc_p5o

A FEW BRAVE SOULS

Here’s a Minnesotan doctor who’s running for governor, and who speaks plainly–they are lying to us:

And here is author Abigail Shrier, who implores Princeton students to reclaim their freedom. From her message to them:

“I know why students keep their heads down. They are hoping for that Goldman or New York Times internship, which they don’t want to put in jeopardy. Well, any institution that takes our brightest, most capable young people—Princeton graduates!—and tells you can only work here if you think like we tell you to and keep your mouth shut, that isn’t really Goldman Sachs and it isn’t the paper of record. It’s the husk of a once-great institution, and it’s not worth grasping for. Talk to alums at these institutions: they sound like those living under communist regimes. That’s the America that awaits you if you will not speak up.”

America’s Front Line Doctors are also straight up calling the side effects from the shots (V)AIDS. From the article:

“Our immune systems produce these antibodies in response to both vaccination and natural infection with COVID,” wrote Berenson. “However – though the researchers do not say so explicitly, possibly because doing so would be politically untenable – spike protein antibody levels are MUCH higher following vaccination than infection. Thus the downstream response to vaccination may be more severe.”

THE DEFENDER: CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE

Robert Kennedy, Jr., is a hero. He would make his dad proud, I think. His organization speaks truth about what is happening. Here we learn that Pfizer and Moderna are making billions off Covid-19, even now they are setting up Omicron to make them even more filthy lucre.

And here Pfizer and Big Pharma are seeking to weaken whistleblower laws. FTA:

MerckAstraZeneca, Amgen and Genentech also oppose the proposed legislation, according to The Intercept. Other groups opposing the legislation include the American Hospital Association, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Federation of American Hospitals, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Healthcare Leadership Council, the Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America and the American Bankers Association.”

Have you heard about American Front Line Nurses? Check them out and find nurses near you.

KEEP CONNECTING THE DOTS

Iain Davis is an investigative journalist who, like Catherine Austin Fitts, is really expert at connecting dots in a matter-of-fact way. I highly recommend spending an hour with this interview. At the very least start at around the 40-minute mark to hear some hard truth. Excellent interview. It’s on Odysee and I could not figure out how to embed it. From the description:

“He discusses the global partnerships between corporations, NGOs, and governments; how one-world governance is being achieved through policymaking and policy distribution; why voting doesn’t matter; who is pulling the public strings; and what we can do to protect ourselves from globalist tyranny.”

Wolf’s Attempt To Embed:

FOOD SECURITY

This can never be far from our minds. There are many levels of being prepared for emergencies, but having enough food to eat and share is among the most important.

Canned beans are good, but having 50 pounds of dried beans and knowing how to cook them, is much better. There are a lot of already-prepared people here. Tips are most welcome. I have the dickens of a time getting beans that turn out well.

Here’s a “live local” website for buying seeds: Seeds for Generations. Living local means finding those businesses and individuals in your community who provide a service or product that cuts out the multi-nationals, the Big Box stores, and places like Amazon and Walmart.

If you want to see what a year’s worth of food looks like, this gal (who is a TYPE A person if ever there was one) shows you her pantry. She’s only been gardening for a couple years. Holy cow!

A Year Without the Grocery Store is a book suggested in the video. I can’t pretend to be at this point, but wouldn’t it be grand to be able to say that you didn’t need to go grocery shopping for a year?

Regarding traditional foods and traditional cooking there is no better place to look than the Weston Price Foundation. This is serious stuff. That old adage, “You are what you eat,” is more true than we know. I highly recommend this site. It has always stood me in good stead.

If you are looking for a Non-GMO source for grains and beans, this is a wonderful site: Palouse Brand. They ship quickly and their grains and beans are of the best quality. Highly recommend.

NOW, FOR THE BRANDY ALEXANDER

Time for a holiday break. Dating from the 1930s and derived from a gin-based cocktail, the Brandy Alexander has been a holiday favorite for many years.

Indeed, it was a favorite of my in-laws, who used vanilla ice cream instead of cream. Fun video here on this easy and festive drink:

Background on Brandy here and here. Info on Crème de cacao and how to make it here. For your listening pleasure I say let’s go all in and listen to Handel!

HOUSE RULES

God bless us, every one! Tiny Tim had such a beautiful soul. He hadn’t a mean bone in his body…unlike most of us. But in keeping with Christmas, we promise to honor Wolf’s rules and keep Scrooge at bay. The Utree is where the Ghost of Christmas Present will conduct you should you need to rattle some chains. Another option, should all hell break loose is here.

Now, back to business.

#FIX 2020 OR BUST

What has happened to the Arizona audit? Seth Keshal is all over it. Go here to his Telegram (scroll to the bottom). He rakes Patrick Byrne and everyone else over the coals. Millions of dollars and nothing to show for it. Jovan Pulitzer, Patrick Byrne, dare I say Mike Flynn…

UPDATE: A mea culpa. Got taken in. Wrong Telegram account. Have been graciously corrected. I will leave the mistake up for my own shame. But do ignore. 😔

It seems like the steam has been taken out of the investigation of election fraud in the 2020 election. But no. Work continues. We will overcome. Here’s a good resource:

Election Fraud 20 is a site that gives excellent snapshots and updates of election fraud by state. This is a site to be bookmarked and shared. I don’t know how we recover from what is beginning to look like a typical deep state slow walk, but we can’t give up. Truth, justice, and the American way will prevail.

CHOICE OR FORCE? KNOW THE DIFF

Do we really know the difference between CHOICE and FORCE? Corey’s Digs has a great article about that. Hard truths:

“Self worth, confidence, integrity, beliefs, morals, ethical values, and boundaries are all needed to take these steps. If you remove the feeling of being “forced”, pressured, being boxed in or cornered, and the fear that goes with it, to melt away long enough to sit still with your heart – ask yourself what you really want. Do you want to work for a company that is part of the building blocks to our enslavement? Will that fulfill you, or eat you alive with each paycheck you cash? Are you willing to “choose” to comply against all of your beliefs and continue to ride out the tyranny, expecting that more will not be “required” of you with each passing month? Is the short-term comfort going to lead to long-term discomfort? Is it possible that there are hundreds, possibly thousands of other people at your place of employment that feel as you do and are willing to take a stand against the tyranny, alongside you?”

ODDS AND ENDS

Father of trans child (is there such a being?) runs for office. God give him the win. That dirty Gov. Abbott certainly hasn’t lifted a finger to help.

The sickos are all intertwined. God help us:

https://twitter.com/JesseMatchey/status/1467831289847836676

The Turn (when you finally admit there is something wrong with your pov). Dr. Malone recommends as a great read.

Cato Institute (libertarian and somewhat squishy) rates freedom in the 50 states. Their data and how it’s calculated. Hope the math minds around here weigh in.

Also, found this interesting organization: Free State Project. Of course one of the authors of the 50-state freedom raters is from New Hampshire. Still, there are some intriguing points.