Our mission, as God-fearing and God-loving patriots, is to defend this Constitutional Republic and to increase its greatness, in all good things and ways, by using our voices in free but courteous speech, by discussing the happenings of the world and coming to a profound understanding of those things, and by sharing and promulgating these Truths on both this platform and others.
The image of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) for today’s offering header is courtesy of Wikipedia. Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated items in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.
NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part Two
This article will discuss a sampling of more “details” from the Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID; followed by a presentation of the Patent for this injectable. The Package Insert for NUVAXOVID is here: https://www.fda.gov/media/186544/download. Let’s look at this statement on page 5, under the footnotes for section 6 ADVERSE REACTIONS:
**** In other words: it appears that there were TWO DIFFERENT manufacturing processes for the NUVAXOVID used in the clinical trials listed above the footnotes (seven clinical trials in all) — shades of the “Process 1” and “Process 2” manufacturing methods used by Pfizer-BioNTech for BNT162b2.
Study 1 (NCT04611802), which Yours Truly will call the first “NUVAXOVID Process 1 study” was conducted in the United States, Mexico, and Puerto Rico; Study 2 (NCT04583995), using the “NUVAXOVID Process 2 study”) was conducted in the United Kingdom; Study 3 (NCT04533300), another “NUVAXOVID Process 2 study”) was performed in South Africa; and, Study 4 (NCT 02368988), the final “NUVAXOVID Process 2 study”) was performed in the United States and Australia. Studies 1, 5, 6, and 7 used the “NUVAXOVID Process 1” manufacturing method. Information regarding the changes to the manufacturing processes for NUVAXOVID is found in this document, beginning on page 23 and continuing through page 31: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/nuvaxovid-epar-public-report_en.pdf, 4 January 2022. A screenshot of a portion of page 23 is below:
What follows, through page 31 of this document, is a “public-view description” of the multiple changes to the manufacturing process for NUVAXOVID: changes that occurred while clinical studies were ongoing; changes that occurred due to the “vaccine” (NVX-CoV2373, the “other name” for NUVAXOVID) being manufactured by at least two different entities in two different countries; changes that resulted in different types of formulations; and more. Were the human study subjects in the seven studies listed above informed that the NUVAXOVID (NVX-CoV2373) that was injected into them could have been manufactured in, for example, Japan or India? That the composition of the formulation that was injected into them could be different from one human study subject to another? Did the study subjects have to sign off on the above?
Looking “further afield” regarding the (at least two; perhaps, more?) manufacturing processes for NUVAXOVID, Yours Truly found this: https://www.mci.edu/en/news-filter-en/228-researchernews/4068-nuvaxovid-new-vaccine-explained, ” Nuvaxovid – the new subunit SARS-CoV-2 vaccine”, Carmen Nussbaumer, 28 February 2022 (Innsbruck, Austria.) A screenshot of the section, “What comprises the Nuvaxovid vaccine?” is below. This article confirms that the spike protein is the basis for NUVAXOVID. It also confirms that the spike protein is “inserted” into a virus created from the Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cell line, which is then introduced into the body — thus, two different viruses are used: the manipulated “baculovirus” that is inserted into the Sf9 insect cells + the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.:
The Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID (link above) appears to focus on Study 1 (NCT04611802, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04611802), which was conducted in the United States, Mexico, and Puerto Rico. On page 8 of the Fact Sheet, for example, there is a breakdown of the types and percentages of study subjects affected by adverse reactions to NUVAXOVID. The figures on page 8 are, in Yours Truly’s opinion, revealing: one sees that the numbers of Study 1 subjects who had adverse reactions to this “vaccine” far outweigh the numbers of Study 1 subjects who were given the saline solution placebo injections. A screenshot of a portion of page is below:
Grade 3 adverse reactions include those which interfere with normal daily activities; which cause a high degree of pain; and so on. Grade 4 adverse reactions include those which require Emergency Room visits or hospitalization; which indicate tissue death (necrosis); and more. One more detail in the Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID: on page 42, the (“official”, per the Package Insert) manufacturer of this “vaccine” is Sanofi (also known as Sanofi-Pasteur.) A screenshot of page 42 is below:
Sanofi has a website devoted to NUVAXOVID: https://www.nuvaxovid.com/. This website states that the product does not contain SARS-CoV-2:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The information regarding the differences in manufacturing processes among what Yours Truly will call the “NUVAXOVID Process 1” and the “NUVAXOVID Process 2” led one to look up the Patent for NUVAXOVID: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11253586B2/en, “Coronavirus vaccine formulations”. A screenshot of the Title and Date Summary of the Patent is below:
A screenshot of Claim 1 is below:
Which, by the way, appears to confirm that: the SARS-CoV-2 virus is NOT found in nature; that the spike protein of this virus is the foundation for NUVAXOVID; and, that elements of the spike protein were modified for use in the “vaccine” (modRNA.) Which also appears to contradict the statement on the Sanofi-sponsored NUVAXOVID website (link above, and image from the website) that there is no SARS-CoV-2 in the product.
Some other details from the Patent: One: Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, regarding two SARS-CoV-2 polypeptides (BV2365 and BV2373) which bind well to the ACE2 receptor enzymes in the body. These receptors are crucial for controlling blood pressure, wound healing, and inflammation (https://www.asbmb.org/asbmb-today/science/051620/what-is-the-ace-2-receptor, 16 May 2020.) Apparently, the inventors of NUVAXOVID spent time and effort in manipulating BV2365 and BV2373 to get the results they wanted: SARS-CoV-2 virus elements that would bind as completely as possible to the ACE2 receptors in the body. Two: there are several types of “detergents” that can be used (“in embodiments” is the language in the Patent) in NUVAXOVID to “scrub clean” the surface of body cells to assist the “vaccine’s” entry into these cells. Two such detergents are NP-9 and polysorbate 80 (PS80.) PS80 was one chosen for the U.S. version of this “vaccine” (see the Package Insert [link above], section 11 DESCRIPTION.)
**** The combination of the spike protein elements + PS80 make up the nanoparticle used in NUVAXOVID (Claim 6): it appears that the PS80 surfactant detergent “scrubs clean” the surface of the ACE2 receptors; so that the manipulated BV2365 and BV2373 enzymes from the spike protein can gain entry into these receptors: therefore interfering with their normal functions of controlling blood pressure, wound healing, inflammation, and other processes. In addition, the PS80 + spike protein which makes up the nanoparticle for NUVAXOVID allows the spike protein to be “mainlined” into every cell in the body.
But wait, there’s more! Reading through more of the Patent, it is apparent that: One: other forms of CoV (coronavirus) elements can be used (MERS, SARS-CoV), either alone OR IN COMBINATION with the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, in NUVAXOVID; Two: it appears that the BV2373 enzyme from the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the “prime instigator” used in the “vaccine”; Three: that the “vaccine” is formulated to specifically attack the CD4 – CD8 cells of the body; Four: that ALUMINUM salts can also be used as an adjuvant in the “vaccine”; Five: that the use of the Matrix-M adjuvant (made from the soapbark tree) in the “vaccine” MAY LEAVE TRACE ELEMENTS of the manufacturing process for this adjuvant; and, Six: that the Matrix-M adjuvant can comprise AS MUCH AS 85% of the “vaccine” formulation. Note: adjuvants are used in “vaccines” to increase the response in body of the “vaccinated” person.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
**** What we have now is the following: A COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine”, called NUVAXOVID. This “vaccine”: may include not only the spike protein from the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but ALSO elements from other coronaviruses (MERS, or SARS-CoV, or others); which may include one OR more detergents (NP-9, PS80. or others); which may include UP TO 85% of a lab-created compound called Matrix-M, an adjuvant, lab-created from elements of the soapbark tree; which MAY also include aluminum salts as an adjuvant; which includes a “baculovirus” that is lab-created from the Sf9 cells of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm), a voracious crop destroyer insect; which is manufactured under “partnership” with Sanofi, or with FUJIFILM (Japan), or in India (the latter two locations were where the NUVAXOVID used in clinical trials were manufactured; it is unknown if these two locations are still being used to manufacture the “vaccine”); which is a “vaccine” that CROSSES THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER, in addition to entering into every cell of the “vaccinated” body; which allows the PS80 + spike protein nanoparticle in NUVAXOVID to be “mainlined” into every cell in the body; and, which contains at least one chemical compound — methyl-alpha-D-mannopyranoside) that is “Not for drug or household use” (https://www.tcichemicals.com/OP/en/p/M0368; click on “Safety & Regulations” tab; then click “Safety Data Sheet (SDS)” in English); and, finally, that the FDA-issued Package Insert for Healthcare Providers only contains the information that Novavax has given to the FDA. NUVAXOVID is a modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.” It is NOT a “safer alternative” to COMIRNATY, to SPIKEVAX, to mNEXSPIKE, or to any other COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.” In fact, NUVAXOVID, in Yours Truly’s opinion, could be slightly more dangerous than the other COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” — because the nanoparticle used in this “vaccine” is made up of a detergent + the elements of the SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein itself (manipulated with Sf9 insect “baculovirus”.)
The FDA has granted full approval for this “vaccine.” Who, reading the information in today’s offering, along with that in Part One of the NUVAXOVID series, would allow this product to be injected into their body — or into the body of their child?
Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1
(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items that are available on the Internet, the ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions in today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)
The image of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) for today’s offering header is courtesy of Wikipedia.
Health Friday is a series devoted to information about Big Pharma, vaccines, general health, and associated topics. There are Important Notifications from our host, Wolf Moon; the Rules of our late, good Wheatie; and, certain caveats from Yours Truly, of which readers should be aware. They are linked here. Note: AI-generated items in today’s offering will be cited as such. If readers wish to post AI-generated item in today’s discussion thread, they must cite their source. Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
NUVAXOVID, the Novavax COVID-19 Bioweapon “Vaccine”: Part One
Yours Truly has written many times regarding the modRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines”, BNT162b2 (now COMIRNATY, by Pfizer-BioNTech); and, mRNA-1273 (SPIKEVAX) and mRNA-1283 (mNEXSPIKE), by Moderna. Today’s offering concerns NUVAXOVID, the mRNA COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” by Novavax. One will state at the outset that NUVAXOVID is not a “safer” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.” In Yours Truly’s opinion, there IS NO “SAFE” or “SAFER” COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” — no matter what “delivery platform technology” is used. This includes modRNA-based, mRNA-based, saRNA-based, “protein subunit” based, “inactivated”, or any other platform technology. Any COVID-19 “vaccine” that is based on the SARS-CoV-2 virus (no matter if the entire spike protein is used, or part of the spike protein is used, in the product). Why? Because of the following, among other reasons: First, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein itself, which was developed to invade the lungs and to attack the ACE2 receptors of the body (in the heart, intestines, and kidney, among other locations); and, Second, the other ingredients that these “vaccines” contain, among them: dangerous nanoparticles (ALC-0159; ALC-0315; SM-102); N1-methylpseudouridine; antibiotics; detergents; SV40; “loose” DNA fragments; — and, in the case of NUVAXOVID, insect matter from an invasive crop destroyer insect. By the way, NUVAXOVID utilizes the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 — and has deletions / alterations that were introduced into it — thus making this “vaccine” a modRNA-based injectable.
The “culturing bath” for the modRNA mixture used in NUVAXOVID is lab-created from elements derived from Spodoptera frugiperda. This, in itself, in Yours Truly’s opinion, makes the final product suspect from the start. Such a “culturing bath” has its own potential risks and issues. Such a “culturing bath” is NOT “safer” or “better” than the E. coli-derived ones used by Pfizer-BioNTech and by Moderna for their COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine” products.
Yours Truly now turns to the FDA-issued Package Insert for Healthcare Providers for NUVAXOVID: https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines,blood&biologics/published/Package-Insert-and-Patient-Package-Insert-NUVAXOVID.pdf. The healthcare providers Package Insert will be discussed first. Please see the following screenshots from this document. Note the admission, in section 5.2, that this “vaccine” can cause myocarditis / pericarditis; the dismissive language in section 6.2; the “potential benefits outweigh the potential risk”-type of argument in section 8.2; and the enormous amount of “adjuvant” used per injection of NUVAXOVID, compared to the amount of modRNA per injection:
Also: Pages 11 – 14 et seq. in the healthcare provider Package Insert — the Adverse Reactions sections — consistently has clearly dismissive language regarding adverse reactions reported as being “not causative.”
So far, what we see from the healthcare provider Package Insert is: that NUVAXOVID can cause heart issues; that postmarketing “vaccine”-induced issues can be dismissed under “not sufficient causal relationship” to having taken the “vaccine”; that, apparently, no animal (non-human) studies were performed to investigate whether or not NUVAXOVID elements are excreted in breast milk; that the “potential benefits outweigh potential risks” canard regarding taking COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccines” somehow applies to human lactation; and, that the ** published ** ingredients list of NUVAXOVID reads like a “laundry list” of chemicals plus a dose of crop-destroying insect residue plus a hefty dose of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
Let’s look at some of the ingredients listed in section 11 DESCRIPTION of this “vaccine”: One: the “rS” spike protein used in NUVAXOVID is the full-length S protein; and, the “vaccine” attacks both the B-lymphocyte and the T-lymphocyte immune mechanisms. Please see: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8897963/, “Editorial: First Approval of the Protein-Based Adjuvanted Nuvaxovid (NVX-CoV2373) Novavax Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 Could Increase Vaccine Uptake and Provide Immune Protection from Viral Variants”, Dinah V. Parums, MD, PhD, March 2022. Two: the lab-creation of the Sf9 Spodoptera frugiperda insect cell line used for the “culturing bath” for NUVAXOVID apparently only requires a BSL-1 laboratory level (thus making the process of culturing insect cell lines for use in “vaccines” faster and cheaper.) Please see: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392062088_The_Bioengineering_of_Insect_Cell_Lines_for_Biotherapeutics_and_Vaccine_Production_An_Updated_Review, Michal Sulek, Angieszka Szuster-Ciesielska, May 2025. (The title of the paper is the same as the URL.) Three: a few of the other ingredients in NUVAXOVID: potassium dihydrogen phosphate, a potassium salt that is used in fertilizer (https://pubchem.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/compound/Monobasic-potassium-phosphate); and, disodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate, a chemical compound that is not for food or drug use: https://www.biosynth.com/Files/MSDS/FS/32/MSDS_FS32721_7000_EN.pdf; see section 1; and, polysorbate 80, a surfactant (a type of detergent) used in soaps and cosmetics.
Adding these into the summary of what NUVAXOVID contains, we now have, citing only the items above: The full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein + residue from the “culturing bath” that is lab-created from the Sf9 elements of the Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) + a potassium salt that is used in fertilizer + a chemical compound that is not to be used in food or drugs + a detergent. Then, there is the “Matrix-M” adjuvant used in this “vaccine”, made of “Fraction A” and “Fraction C” from the soapbark tree (Quillaja saponaria Molina.) Matrix-M is the largest amount of any ingredient in NUVAXOVID — 50mcg in the injection. Please see: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/drug-delivery/articles/10.3389/fddev.2023.1279710/full, “Biodistribution of the saponin-based adjuvant Matrix-M (TM) following intramuscular injection in mice”, Cecilia Carnrot, et al., 5 November 2023. Note: every author of this paper is affiliated with Novavax AB (Sweden), or with Novavax Inc., Gaithersburg, MD. An image of Figure 3 (biodistribution) of this paper is below. Apologies for the length of the image:
Note the accumulations of the Matrix-M adjuvant COMBINED WITH THE SARS-CoV-2 SPIKE PROTEIN (the dark blue dots on the above image) in areas of the body. Note that NUVAXOVID crosses the Blood-Brain Barrier and enters the brain. Note that many of the accumulations INCREASE over the timeframe biodistribution period.
Let’s look at the Information for Patients and Caregivers section of the FDA Package Insert, which begins on Page 44 of the document. Yours Truly is including two images from this section of the Package Insert:
Note the FDA “bafflegab” regarding the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in NUVAXOVID. The “vaccine” is BASED ON THE SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS. The “XFG variant”, which is the “official” SARS-CoV-2 variant used in the “vaccine”, IS “DESCENDED” FROM THE ORIGINAL WUHAN HU1 SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS VIA THE OMICRON LINEAGE. The FDA “bafflegab” is like saying, for example, “Well, I don’t have any German blood in me, since my German ancestors came to the United States 150 years ago.” Of course the DNA of one’s ancestors is present in the bloodline, even if in smaller amounts. And, note the complete lack of information regarding the “other ingredients” listed for NUVAXOVID. Unless the patient / caregiver looks up information on the chemicals listed, they won’t know, for example, that disodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate is not for food or drug use (see above in today’s offering.) Yours Truly will again state: NUVAXOVID is NOT a “safer” modRNA-based COVID-19 bioweapon “vaccine.”
To be continued with a deeper dive into the modRNA details, and more, of NUVAXOVID, in Part Two.
Peace, Good Energy, Respect: PAVACA1
(Intellectual Property Disclaimer and Notice: Except for the linked URLs and other items available on the Internet in today’s offering, the ideas and/or opinions above are by PAVACA1 (M.E. Forbes, aka M.E.C. Forbes.) Credit must be given to PAVACA1 if ideas and/or opinions from today’s offering are used by other blog writers; by podcasters; or in print or social media.)
This man, making Christmas calls from the White House, believes the world is a sphere. And he has even flown around it! So has our beautiful FLOTUS, who happens to be his wife!
Truth and common sense must be valued by us, as individuals, in order to lastingly disempower the authoritarian fake news media. This includes the perniciously smarmy science media, which never answers for its errors and lies. I believe that the media has been responsible not only for leftist pathologies like scientism, medical fascism, and radical gender ideology, but also for reactionary movements like modern flat Earth, rejection of all medicine, and Biblical geological literalism.
Just as Wheatie’s Stormwatch Monday Open Thread was created as a place for people to openly express their thoughts and opinions, so, too, is this Thank God Thursday Open Thread, where honest but civil discussion of all topics is encouraged. This thread is also to be known as Theistic Evolution Thursdays, due to the author’s expected “pontification” about his scientific, religious, and political opinions. You are welcome to pontificate back! Free speech matters!
Please label all AI-generated content as being such, unless it is patently obvious (e.g., humorous AI images). It is important that we as individuals not begin to pretend that socially derived artificial intelligence is actually our own, as this form of stealthy social information averaging and feedback would be one more pretense and deception between people, in service of stupid Marxist socialism, and of those who wish to substitute their communally protected lies for actual truth.
The source of alleged truth matters, not for the truth itself, but for validation.
And yes, it’s THURSDAY…again.
And that’s it. We’re done stealing from Wheatie.
OK – maybe her rules need to be posted.
No food fights.
No running with scissors.
If you bring snacks, bring enough for everyone.
Other rules may be derivable from these, and that conjecture is left for discussion.
If there is nothing beyond the “W” below, then this is a placeholder. For health reasons, I can’t always post a timely opinion before each Thursday, but I will try. Otherwise, you have this placeholder post, where YOU provide the content. Enjoy!
W
Moar AI Spam
AI is assisting with the proliferation of bullshit, because it puts fairly smart white lies in the hands of fairly dumb people who need them.
Example? This bit of engineered bullshit, either actual spam, or IC AI bullshit disguised as spam, trying to get on this site.
Note – I included Cuppa Covfefe’s last comment on the Open – A REAL COMMENT – for context. That comment was made roughly 4 1/2 years ago.
For those with low vision, the text of the spam post:
‘This Sanctuary Sunday Open Thread’ beautifully fosters unity, faith, and respectful dialogue. I appreciate the emphasis on civility, truth, and open discussion. A great reminder of how meaningful and peaceful conversations can shape a strong, thoughtful community.
I’ll be frank – that’s a nice comment. I won’t say why it’s obviously an AI comment, because I don’t reveal tells of that nature – but for those and other very definitive reasons, I can assure you that it’s an AI comment.
Now, let’s compare that with the following first few paragraphs of Carl’s post, which were analyzed and turned into that AI response.
In the original post, both “Sanctuary Sunday Open Thread” and “Please show respect and consideration” were bolded, and it’s clear that the AI noted this, by putting single quotes around those first four words, which were played back. In the sample from Carl’s post, below, I am bolding almost all of the things on which the AI appeared to be focused.
This Sanctuary Sunday Open Thread, with full respect to those who worship God on the Sabbath, is a place to reaffirm our worship of our Creator, our Father, our King Eternal.
It is also a place to read, post and discuss news that is worth knowing and sharing. Please post links to any news stories that you use as sources or quote from.
In the QTree, we’re a friendly and civil lot. We encourage free speech and the open exchange and civildiscussion of different ideas. Topics aren’t constrained, and sound logic is highly encouraged, all built on a solid foundation of truth and established facts.
We have a policy of mutual respect, shown by civility. Civility encourages discussions, promotes objectivity and rational thought in discourse, and camaraderie in the participants – characteristics we strive toward in our Q Tree community.
Please show respect and consideration for our fellow QTreepers. Before hitting the “post” button, please proofread your post and make sure you’re addressing the issue only, and not trying to confront the poster. Keep to the topic – avoid “you” and “your”. Here in The Q Tree, personal attacks, name calling, ridicule, insults, baiting and other conduct for which a penalty flag would be thrown are VERBOTEN.
In The Q Tree, we’re compatriots, sitting around the campfire, roasting hot dogs, making s’mores and discussing, agreeing, and disagreeing about whatever interests us. This board will remain a home for those who seek respectfulconversations.
Let’s not give the Internet Censors a reason to shut down this intellectual haven that Wolf has created for us.
Note that the word “faith” was not there – it was generated by the AI. The only place “faith” appeared in Carl’s entire post was 12 times in a large paragraph way down in the body of the post. If you want to check it out…..
Thus, the mere mention of “worship” at the beginning, and the entire context of the body of Carl’s post, were likely the origin of “faith” in the AI comment.
“Meaningful” and “peaceful” are also derived from the larger context. Those words are not present, although “peace” appears 5 times in the body of the message from Carl.
I want you all to understand that the AI is basically doing what high school students and college students are trained to do, in writing a reply letter, answering essay questions, or otherwise composing written material based on some source, without plagiarizing. It’s reading, grabbing concepts, mixing things up, generalizing about what is observed, then composing a restatement which comes very close to what was originally said, from a reader perspective, without “aping” the original, which is both cringeworthy and considered plagiarism.
AI is pleasing its trainers, just like students try to please their trainers teachers.
This is why AI is being used by students to pass exams.
Andrew Torba has a masterful post about this, which you all really need to read. He predicts that universities themselves, as we know them, are about to be on life support, because of AI.
After reading Torba’s post, I realize that Harvard is falling apart for multiple reasons. IMO, woke does not have the honesty needed to deal with AI, or anything else, for that matter.
Over the next 15 years, universities will face existential pressure to adapt or perish. Some may evolve into credentialing hubs, offering “micro-degrees” for niche skills.
Excerpt:
Artificial intelligence is not merely a tool for incremental change it is the architect of a total overhaul. At the heart of this transformation is a radical reimagining of how knowledge is delivered, absorbed, and validated. At Alpha School in Texas, students spend just two hours a day learning with AI, yet they outperform 98% of students nationwide, scoring in the top 1-2% on standardized tests.
WOLF AGAIN…..
The question will not be whether you can use AI to fake out people about how smart you are, in their decaying system. The question will be whether (1) you can use AI for real research, or (2) whether you can change, fix, use, or install AI to do something useful and good to others.
That output of your use of AI may include good stuff, or bad stuff. People who use AI for bad stuff will need to be punished. Good AI and AI in the hands of good people will get it done.
Welcome to the future.
Mutually Acceptable Lies About The Clot Shot
It’s time to be honest about what is going on in HHS, NIH, FDA and CDC.
Reform of these agencies – whose sins almost killed us, and did in fact kill many of us, and many other people around the world – will NOT occur by a quantum leap from bad to good.
It is occurring gradually and continuously, just like the end of government-sanctioned slavery did, in centuries past. And just like The Death of Slavery (cough), the entire process of Death To The Death Jabs (cough, cough) will be a shifting morass of what I call “mutually acceptable lies“.
PAVACA has very nicely documented the various half-measures, quarter-measures, and non-measures which have been taken by the government-ensconced part of MAHA against the clot-shots.
That is the current state of the matter. Not the end state – the current state.
Stated bluntly, the jabs are being gently but not honestly withdrawn from the young and the healthy, and are being kept, with no denial of existing fictions, for the sick, the old, the infirm, and the chronically medicated.
You know – the very people that a socialist depopulation program still wants to remove.
NOW do you see why the current assortment of lies and truths might be mutually acceptable to the two sides?
You don’t normally think like a depopulationist, or like somebody whose kids are being threatened by a shadowy cartel. So you never saw it coming – that our side would accept both some silver and some lead – at least temporarily. Or that the other side – the depop cartel – would accept a mixed bag. Yes – just like the drug cartels, they accept shifting realities.
The BAD SIDE threatened our children and young adults, and showed us that they had the power to not just kill our loved ones, but to make us do it – to make us part of the murder. Having them back off from this extortion is what we get, in return for their continued elimination of the people they wanted to eliminate all along – the weak, the old, the medically costly, the non-productive, and the undesirable, who can be slipped into their caskets at any time by a few shots.
This was very skillful play by the depoppers and their deep state allies. Do you see it? They had a REASON for pushing the jabs too far. So that when their commu-Nazi tide went back out, it was still deep enough to drown the “useless eaters”.
Now – this is not the spoken reality – meaning the lies. What I gave you is the mutually acceptable truth. The mutually acceptable lies are continuation of the scientific bullshit about antibody count, no need for clinical testing, and most of all, the need for those medical pobrecitos (poor young little ones) to get the merciful jabs to protect them from the still mythically Wuhan-dangerous omicron common cold.
THAT is their goal. THAT is what they needed to accomplish.
Somebody is still gonna pick the cotton and go to Heaven.
We know the “dangers” to these fragile patients are all bullshit, already shockingly disproved by the “peer-reviewed” literature. But the media that can never be wrong, and the scientific media that is even worse, are “not done not talking about things” – so we have to wait for memories to cool, so that nobody gets in trouble for slavery killing Black and Indian kids with jabs.
So what do we do?
We keep pushing on. We keep fighting. We make sure the public, the MAHA now in office, and (importantly) the American pope know that the fight for human life is not over – that “depopulation” is real, that it’s insidious, and that its stealthy proponents are not done fighting.
The depoppers will put up a hell of a fight to keep things where they are right now – where they not only have the elderly and the infirm at the end of a population-adjusting needle, but where they also have a prime depopulation AGENT (coronavirus spike protein) authorized for that needle.
And yet, I think we have some strong weapons at hand, against their strong lies.
If our theories are correct, then we will find evidence of safer outcomes with non-mRNA vaccines like Novavax, Coronavac (ChiCom jab), CorbeVax, and others that omit the mRNA technology. Even better, the new “Gold Standard” “universal platform” jabs that are now being pushed by Secretary Kennedy and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, should prove much safer than mRNA.
Yeah, they’re not perfect – but they’re better. Fewer people will die. SOME people – in fact MANY people – will be rescued from depopulation.
This is war. There will be casualties. But we will win.
At that time, I introduced a general concept of vaccine-consequential medical dependence upon vaccines, which I called “vaccine addiction slavery“. I was explaining how spike protein-based vaccines for COVID-19 might in fact become literally addictive like barbiturates – meaning fatally so upon withdrawal.
Barbiturates are very old sleeping pills. They work remarkably well – better than opiates – except for one problem. They are even more addictive than opiates.
If you abruptly stop taking barbiturates once addicted – you die. And they are terribly difficult to withdraw from, slowly. This would be the same thing for the COVID vaccines. Stop taking them, and you die. You would have to KEEP taking them to live.
Keep this in mind. Barbiturates were “old tech”. They were EARLY tech. It took DECADES to find more modern sleeping pills that are less addictive, but still problematic (e.g., benzodiazepines). This technological history is COMPLETELY ANALOGOUS to COVID vaccines, in my opinion. It’s also similar to antibiotics. Remember MERCURY as an antibiotic?
In all of these cases – antibiotics, sleeping pills and COVID vaccines – you NOT ONLY don’t want to take these things continuously – you especially don’t want to take the early ones, that are basically poisons of one kind or another.
So how is addiction to a vaccine possible?
The idea is, that if you get “hooked” on vaccines which show certain immunological deficiencies, relative to an evolving disease – meaning they can’t keep up AND they leave you worse off than natural immunity – then you cannot quit the vaccines under pain of death from the disease. You would become locked in a battle of vaccine manufacturers vs. the virus, dependent upon THEIR ability to stay ahead of the evolution of the virus, and the government’s willingness to give you the shot. If you don’t get the vaccine – or don’t get it on time – your vaccine-trashed immunity fails, and you die.
Obviously communists and globalists would LOVE this situation. You don’t comply? You’re gonna die.
On top of THAT, the vaccines themselves would eventually kill you, just like heroin or fentanyl.
Wherein we explain – at three different levels of scientific and political understanding – how ADE-mediated vaccine slavery works. This post is to PREPARE YOU to watch what the other side is doing RIGHT NOW, so you can spot the deceptions. Right now they are DESPERATELY trying to make a FAILING PLAN work. Their plan …
If you didn’t read that old post, and you got vaccinated, you may be silently freaking out just a bit at this point. Hopefully you already got Omicron. THAT is the real vaccine. A quality vaccine. A NATURAL vaccine, although “upgraded” a bit by somebody. So you can calm down just a bit, if you got Omicron, and have begun to bushwhack your way back to natural immunity.
You’re not gonna die – as long as you STAY OFF THE DAMN VACCINES.
I will explain why in a moment.
But here is the big message.
There has been growing PROOF that the vaccines have the properties necessary for vaccine addiction. And now, there is PROOF of such addiction IN REALITY – from Canada.
I’m not NECESSARILY saying that Mafia daughter Nancy Pelosi and dubious East-coast Italian liar Anthony Fauci might take a mafia trick into government, and upgrade the heroin business to a world-wide scale, using a medical and government mafia, and go after ALL people instead of just black people, but……
Canadian data show vaccines now RAISE the risk of death from Covid
“Vaccinated people are now more likely to be hospitalized or die from Covid, even after adjusting for fact they’re older than the unvaccinated, according to official government estimates”
In May, the most recent month for which figures are available, only 9 percent of Covid deaths and 14 percent of hospital admissions in Manitoba occurred among unvaccinated people, even though they are 17 percent of the population.
Manitoba, which has about 1.4 million residents, also provides figures that are adjusted for the fact that vaccinated and boosted people tend to be older.
Those show that in May, vaccinated but unboosted people were about 50 percent more likely to be hospitalized or die of Covid than unvaccinated people. People who had received boosters had roughly the same risk of hospitalization or death as the unvaccinated.
Once you’re hooked on the vaccines, instead of the virus, you start to run a higher risk that you will DIE from the disease unless you get and stay boosted – but the vaccines will ALSO kill you by their own effects.
It’s a DOUBLY INSIDIOUS fate. It’s just like heroin addiction. The “cure” of more product will kill you on its own, AND it keeps you locked in.
(End of comment)
That right there is the short version. We now have a very nice example – corrected for numbers – corrected for age – that shows people “needing” to be either boosted or unvaccinated to not die of COVID at the “maximum rate”, which rate happens if you are “addicted to the jabs but late on payments”.
This is EXACTLY what I predicted would happen. And don’t even think about the vaccine being “safer” than being unvaccinated. The scientific trickery that was used to try to hide vaccine deaths has been appalling to this here scientist. The longer you take ANY vaccine which puts spike protein into your bloodstream, the greater your risk of “sudden adult death syndrome”.
You have a choice. Small, periodic, immunity-granting “colds”, or much more frequent vaccines that are guaranteed to put spike protein in your blood twice a year. And if you’re a WOMAN on that vaccine schedule, congratulations – you will likely never get a pregnancy that lasts to term.
It’s a small effect now – 50% greater chance of death on a disease that doesn’t kill many in most age groups – but I will bet money that there is a nice upward delta with the number of vaccinations, just like with the length of time one takes barbiturates.
First new scientific prediction: the longer you are addicted to the COVID vaccines, the greater the chance of death if you get the disease (i.e., the penalty for withdrawal increases with time).
Second new scientific prediction: the penalty for “withdrawal” increases with age (meaning seniors are at the most risk from withdrawal).
Third new scientific prediction: vaccinated kids (who survive the cardiac effects of the spike protein) are fully addicted by adulthood.
Ah, this crime is so smooth, one almost has to think that “this ain’t their first rodeo”. They had to have seen this in animal studies, and kept it under wraps.
Seriously. There had to be animal studies of corona viruses AND corona virus vaccines that showed potential for “depopulation” – both lowering lifespan AND reducing fertility.
And then somebody got ideas.
EVIL.
So what is the mechanism by which this happens? The fact of the matter is that we on the “outside” in “Fake Science” are learning as fast as we can. There are two main effects that we know about, from prior science, which seem relevant – ADE and OAS.
ADE
One effect behind a vaccine “making a disease worse” is called “antibody dependent enhancement”, or ADE for short. We can generalize that even further, to include other mechanisms than just the antibodies of “classic” ADE, by including anything that might be called “vaccine-dependent enhancement”, whether it involves antibodies or not. But for simplicity, let’s just call it all “ADE”.
Classic ADE involves a vaccine’s creation of what can be called “inappropriate antibodies”, which are problematic when the disease strikes later. Vaccination creates antibodies, and for whatever reason, those antibodies are not helpful when the disease strikes, but may actually make the situation WORSE, through various sins of omission or commission.
Now, we can expand that just a bit, to include other vaccine effects that make the disease worse, when one gets it. One such effect which appears relevant for COVID vaccines is a general DECREASE in immunity toward ALL DISEASES. This may be mediated though the interferon system.
There is still a lot of debate as to, and study of, what is going on in the weeks after COVID vaccination, but even the Faucists admit that immunity toward COVID itself is DECREASED immediately after injection, and does not rise to positive for a period of days to low weeks. (This, by the way, turned out to be a great excuse for ignoring vaccine side effects.) THEN, after specific immunity to COVID stays positive for a period of long weeks to low months, it tapers off, and people “need” boosters to maintain immunity toward COVID.
Meanwhile, during that entire time, general immunity is lowered toward EVERYTHING in many people, and does not recover for long weeks to months.
How this situation can possibly be regarded as good, mostly involves Anthony Fauci’s “antibody hypnosis”, which keeps us from seeing the bigger picture.
Dr. Nathan Thompson was one of the first to disclose loss of general immune function after COVID vaccination, and the powers that be, came after him HARD. His video disappeared everywhere.
Here are several posts where I covered such topics.
But before looking at those fascinating posts, let’s deal with OAS.
OAS
OAS stands for “original antigenic sin”. This is not actually a hard concept to understand. It is a cute way of saying that while our immune systems are designed to IMPRINT on whatever they were last exposed to, as they figure out an immune response, they ESPECIALLY tend to imprint on new things that they are FIRST exposed to. Therefore, if your immune system imprints on something WRONGLY or MISLEADINGLY the first time, that “sin” is carried on.
In some ways, OAS is the flip side of ADE. Two sides of the same coin. ADE blames the bad antibodies coming back to haunt. OAS blames the setting up of the bad antibodies. Almost the same thing, and often indicted in the same breath.
OAS is another way of viewing the failure of immunity to deal with evolving viruses. Relative to the new virus, the memory of the old virus is “sinful”.
OAS is likewise another way of viewing autoimmune disorders, where we accidentally (or intentionally, in the case of sterilization vaccines) create immunity toward something in our own bodies. The original sin of an inappropriate immunity carries on to cause later problems.
Booster Withdrawal Syndrome
So how do we view the Canadian results in terms of ADE and OAS?
In my opinion, the spike protein vaccines have a “narrowing” effect on immunity, which is the source of their OAS / ADE. They are overly focused on the spike protein, and in particular on the original Wuhan variant spike protein. The antibodies that are created and on duty are basically born as “yesterday’s news”, and not even much of that. “Yesterday’s local suburban news” is what those antibodies are.
Worse still, unlike natural, disease-conferred immunity, there is no immunity gained toward OTHER proteins created by the virus. Those MORE CONSERVED proteins are the ones where antibodies to ONE variant are GOOD AGAINST THE NEXT. Those critical antibodies are NOT created by exposure to the spike protein alone.
Score 1 for natural immunity – score 0 for simplistic spike protein vaccines.
Thus, because the vaccinee’s immune system is over-focused on an old spike protein and nothing else, it becomes worthless against new variants, no matter in what way the rapidly evolving spike proteins have changed. Worse, the immune system doesn’t “start over” and produce general antibodies to the unknown new threat – it keeps throwing the wrong specific ammo at the new virus. Worse still, only a RECENTLY BOOSTED (but not TOO recently booosted) immune system has competent immunity. A vaccinated but non-boosted individual is “running on empty” – and with the wrong kind of gasoline. They have low immunity, and what they have is wrong.
In other words, you’d better have a FRESH DOSE of the BAD VACCINE, once you start taking the bad vaccine. Either that, or stick with natural immunity.
Starting to think that the vaccine might not be a good idea? Read on.
What About Novavax?
I had high hopes for the protein-based Novavax vaccine. Sadly, THAT was before I understood that spike protein pathogenicity dooms these vaccines. Robert Malone actually tried to warn FDA about the problems of building a vaccination program on the spike protein. His efforts were rebuffed.
Absolutely not! Here are my top 5 reasons why you shouldn’t.
COVID is a disease which is easily treatable. Why would you take a risk on a new product with unknown risks when you don’t need to?
As Andrew Wakefield and others point out, we’ve never had a vaccine [presumably meaning a COVID vaccine] where the benefits > outweigh the risk. While this might be the first one, you’ll want to wait for an independent study that proves it.
You can’t trust the FDA, CDC, or drug companies. They have to come clean and admit their issues before we can ever trust them again.
You run the risk of original antigenic sin (OAS) and/or antibody dependent enhancement (ADE). In short, you run the risk of making yourself worse off.
We just don’t know. We don’t know anything about their adjuvant — Matrix M. We don’t know anything about safety. We don’t know if they can manufacture it properly (they are now on their third contract manufacturer).
Steve has three additional links which are fantastic reads. They explain FROM THE DATA exactly why Novavax is both low in benefits and high in risks. This is CLEARLY due to the pathogenic spike protein.
In my opinion, it’s very unlikely that a COVID vaccine which beats disease-conferred immunity will be available for YEARS. Sure, I’ll keep watching, but Novavax is almost certainly not it.
TL;DR – “I believe that mRNA vaccines have serious risks that would be REVEALED by approval of the Novavax vaccine.” –Wolf Moon I’m actually surprised that FDA and Pfizer/China allowed Novavax to get this close to approval, but they clearly have the upcoming vote RIGGED, just like the 2020 election. The trusty “board mules” that …
In my opinion, the approval of a “likely safer” coronavirus vaccine is – in the long game – a big win for popular science – here’s why. The approaching approval (or not) of a competing EUA for the NON-mRNA NON-viral-vector NON-genetic Novavax coronavirus vaccine is going to tell us a LOT about how much power …
I wanted Novavax approved, not only because it was “safer”, but so that “popular science” would be able to get the data for Novavax out of VAERS, after which we can compare it with mRNA vaccines. This will give us powerful estimates on the “price” of the industry misleading us away from the safest possible vaccines, to ones that they preferred for research reasons.
Novavax still has to get past the CDC, and I would not put it past “Rochelle The Knife” Walensky to kill Novavax, but as I have explained elsewhere, I do think that Novavax has made implicit promises not to brag up their (somewhat) better safety relative to mRNA vaccines. They will HANG TOGETHER to make sure they don’t hang separately.
Bottom Line
The bottom line is this. DO NOT GET THE JAB. There are too many reasons right now to skip the jab and to rely on natural immunity.
If I change my mind on that, you will be the first to know, and also the first to know WHY.
W
John Fink and James Coburn discuss case in a scene from the film ‘The Carey Treatment’, 1972. (Photo by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Getty Images)
In my opinion, the approval of a “likely safer” coronavirus vaccine is – in the long game – a big win for popular science – here’s why.
The approaching approval (or not) of a competing EUA for the NON-mRNANON-viral-vectorNON-geneticNovavax coronavirus vaccine is going to tell us a LOT about how much power Pfizer and China still hold over FDA and CDC.
As you may have read two days ago, I regarded the conveniently timed FDA public statement about the myocarditis risks of the Novavax vaccine as a cynical “pot-vs.-kettle” attempt to sway approval and prevent the entirety of future Novavax data from getting into VAERS, where such data would very likely highlight every possible problem with the mRNA vaccine technology of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
TL;DR – “I believe that mRNA vaccines have serious risks that would be REVEALED by approval of the Novavax vaccine.” -Wolf Moon I’m actually surprised that FDA and Pfizer/China allowed Novavax to get this close to approval, but they clearly have the upcoming vote RIGGED, just like the 2020 election. The trusty “board mules” that …
Well, it looks like the VRBPAC bunch did the smart – or at least consistent thing, and recommended approval.
The 21-0 vote with one abstention is telling, IMO. A vote AGAINST would cause an uproar on both sides, and put VRBPAC in the hot seat. Are they shuffling the murder of Novavax off to “the Roach” for a kill? We will see.
Here is a comment I added to my prior post, regarding an article in the Federalist, which takes the “no more approvals of any vaccine” approach – which I believe is well-intended but short-sighted. This comment explain my strategic reasons for supporting approval.
Here is a great example of somebody who sees the vaccines much the same as me, but strategically comes to the exact opposite point of view on approval of Novavax.
Reading his point of view may help people to see mine – or maybe not. Worth a read.
Dr. Gortler basically wants to begin playing fair and correctly on Novavax – making it jump through the hoops that Pfizer and Moderna didn’t have to jump through, but (IN MY OPINION, NOT HIS) thus denying what is likely a SAFER vaccine (in many respects – not all) to people who are going to take a vaccine, one way or another.
In my opinion, admitting the Novavax vaccine will shed necessary light on mRNA technology, as this “shingles-style” (recombinant protein) vaccine will help to highlight the flaws of the mRNA tech in the long run.
This is where I take a “Trumpian” and “they have to be shown” position. I regard a denial here as the kind of “purism” that has been deadly to conservatives, and was responsible for “NeverTrump” as an effective weapon of the left.
We have what is likely a “saf-ER” vaccine. Do we approve it or not?
YMMV.
Wolf Moon, June 9, 2022
Note that there is still plenty of time for FDA and/or CDC to snake Novavax and help Pfizer and China. Will they do it? Let’s wait and see. Either way, we win.
If Rochelle Alinsky and Anthony Fauci knife Novavax in the back to protect mRNA, I will have one of my greatest arguments yet that they need to be removed and prosecuted. The blatant hypocrisy will win more and more Democrats to our side. All of my neighbors are perfect recipients of the message. They will be screaming for Fauci to hang.
If they allow Novavax the opportunity to prove itself [to any degree] safer than mRNA vaccines, they fight another day – but they have to fight a battle we are destined to win.
Like I say, every day is a fight – but we are winning more and more fights, sooner and sooner.
TL;DR – “I believe that mRNA vaccines have serious risks that would be REVEALED by approval of the Novavax vaccine.” –Wolf Moon
I’m actually surprised that FDA and Pfizer/China allowed Novavax to get this close to approval, but they clearly have the upcoming vote RIGGED, just like the 2020 election. The trusty “board mules” that FDA’s Pfizer-lovin’, China-compromised top brass used to approve dangerously experimental, “China-tested”, mRNA vaccines, will suddenly get some phony backbone on myocarditis and virtue signal against a less dangerous vaccine.
Remember Trump getting angry about what FDA and Pfizer (which is really China) did to the J+J vaccine? Same thing.
“Blame the victim.”
It’s how they work, people. And once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
Allow me to explain.
Let’s start off with how I instantly realized what’s in the cards.
As seen on Gateway Pundit, minus my scientific and political explanation of what is going on.
This is CLEARLY a set-up to knife Novavax right before a crucial vote. But first, you need to know two things.
(1) Pfizer and Fauci BURNED THE PFIZER mRNA VACCINE PLACEBO GROUPS to hide the problems with the Pfizer vaccine. (The relevance of placebo groups will be explained a bit later.)
(2) According to Pfizer, which proudly revealed the following fact directly from the mouths of Pfizer’s top brass in a more China-virtue-signaling moment (look it up), ALL of their clinical trials (including all the COVID clinical trials of the past) are now run out of China.
SO – if you see all the SHADY SCIENCE that is popping up in the Pfizer documents, and is now being revealed thanks to Naomi Wolf, there is a simple explanation of why Pfizer burned their placebo groups, making it impossible for people to “check their math”.
CHINESE ETHICS (or lack thereof) are in charge of Pfizer’s clinical trials for all drugs and vaccines.
This is the same China that lies and cheats routinely on all things financial, business, manufacturing, etc. They’re the ones in charge of testing the drugs you are being forced to take by “China Joe”.
Yeah. Pretty convenient. Same vaccine our military is forced to take, too. VERY convenient.
This is a perfect example of “total warfare”, TBH. But let’s set that aside for now.
It’s now very clear that the spike protein is a pathogen. We have gone through all the problems of using the pathogenic spike protein as an immunogen (which Robert Malone warned about, by the way, and which FDA ignored). The spike protein causes a lot of problems, including myocarditis and pericarditis, just like the disease itself. Those problems, however, are compounded by TWO aspects of the technology of the Pfizer mRNA vaccines.
(1) mRNA technology itself is dangerous, because the pseudo-mRNA doesn’t shut down promptly, and in principle can never truly meter the amount of pseudo-spike-protein produced. It can dangerously overproduce the protein.
(2) the lipid nanoparticles used by Pfizer reduce acute symptoms by a kind of delayed release, but this also leads to unnatural persistence, migration throughout the body, excretion of the vaccine itself in body lipids (otherwise known as “exposure” or “shedding”), and a variety of symptoms which differ from the disease itself.
These problems are sidestepped by the more well-understood Novavax approach, which being based on a protein vaccine uses a DIFFERENT kind of “nanoparticle” to present a fully formed pseudo-spike-protein – NOT the mRNA for such, to the cells of the recipient. The spike protein is NOT coated with a lipid envelope, but rather is presented in a “ball of spikes” manner similar to an actual virus.
It is extremely likely that protein vaccines like Novavax and Corbevax are – certainly at the moment – substantially safer than mRNA vaccines. That is an EASY hypothesis to make at this point. Any honest scientist who has seen the data so far could make it. Robert Malone, who deeply understands the mRNA technology, which he properly labels “immature“, gets it totally.
One way to see if the relative safety of current protein tech over current mRNA tech is true, would be to approve the very likely safer Novavax and/or Corbevax in the United States, and to begin letting the data from adverse events flow into the VAERS reporting system. This data would get beyond the “small set” problem of the current trial data.
It’s quite obvious WHY Pfizer and FDA would not want this to happen.
It is extremely likely that Novavax and Corbevax would show greater safety relative to both Pfizer and Moderna. This would naturally lead to the question of why Novavax wasn’t fast-tracked to American citizens in 2020 and 2021, instead of Pfizer and Moderna.
Get it? This is a COVER-UP.
Now – let’s look at the actual data. Novavax is underplaying their hand.
Novavax not being Pfizer, the latter with a known, CONVICTED track record of lying and cheating (particularly after they stupidly entrusted their clinical trials to CHINA), let’s assume for a moment that MAYBE the Novavax clinical trial data is not total lies.
Here is the Novavax statement about the myocarditis/pericarditis issue:
NEWS & MEDIA
Novavax Statement on US FDA Briefing Document Related to Myocarditis/Pericarditis
Jun 3, 2022
Throughout the pandemic, as publicly available vaccines have been administered, there have been numerous investigations into findings related to myocarditis. We have learned that we can expect to see natural background events of myocarditis in any sufficiently large database, and that young males are at higher risk. Myocarditis is most often caused by nonspecific viral infections.
The data from our placebo-controlled studies show that overall, in our clinical development program, the rate of myocarditis was balanced between the vaccine and placebo arms (0.007% and 0.005%). Furthermore, in the post-crossover portions of our studies, the cases we have seen are all within the expected rate.
Based on our interpretation of all the clinical data supporting NVX-CoV2373, including over 50,000 participants in clinical trials, we believe there is insufficient evidence to establish a causal relationship. We will continue to monitor all adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis.
There are two ways to read this. Both of them argue correctly that the Novavax vaccine should be approved.
One way is to read it at “happy face value”. You are perfectly capable of doing that yourselves.
The other way is to read it, both knowing and admitting the hard truths about these vaccines, and what is actually possible when you make a vaccine against a minor coronavirus, for which the very need and justification are arguable at best.
I will read it the second, more conservative way, and you can follow along, sentence by sentence.
Throughout the pandemic, as publicly available vaccines have been administered, there have been numerous investigations into findings related to myocarditis.
This is another way of carefully admitting that myocarditis (more serious than pericarditis) is a real problem of the vaccines, because it’s a problem of the disease, because they both use the pathogenic spike protein.
We have learned that we can expect to see natural background events of myocarditis in any sufficiently large database, and that young males are at higher risk.
This is true. We’ve learned that myocarditis is a natural background problem for young people, and that the spike protein of the disease, BUT EVEN MORE THE SPIKE PROTEIN OF VACCINES, raises that risk for young people. All of this applying more to young MALES.
Myocarditis is most often caused by nonspecific viral infections.
This is true in general. But it can also be caused by vaccines for viruses, as one might rightly expect, because vaccines are INTENDED as a limited case of the disease.
The data from our placebo-controlled studies show that overall, in our clinical development program, the rate of myocarditis was balanced between the vaccine and placebo arms (0.007% and 0.005%).
This is nice data for Novavax. Yes, the Novavax vaccine raises the risk of myocarditis in those who take it, but that risk is already minuscule, with Novavax only raising it by less than 50%. If you HAD to vaccinate kids, which we don’t, then Novavax is a relatively safe alternative, IMO.
Personally, I don’t think that children need the human vaccine AT ALL, because the DISEASE IS A BETTER VACCINE FOR KIDS. Yeah, think about it. Diseases can be vaccines, and vaccines can be diseases. Open your mind to the history of science, when we knew this stuff.
Furthermore, in the post-crossover portions of our studies, the cases we have seen are all within the expected rate.
This is sneaky wording, but it’s a bit of a KNIFE pointed back at FDA. They all KNOW that this applies to all the other vaccines. And maybe even MORE SO in the case of mRNA vaccines.
What exactly IS the “expected rate” of myocarditis? I’m betting strongly that the “expected rate” of myocarditis and pericarditis GOES UP in all vaccinees, just like it goes up in all people who get COVID and don’t treat it, and that the increase takes the form of probability spiking after the vaccination, then settling down to a slightly elevated risk (vs. before vaccination), further increasing with age.
Does FDA want to go there? Probably not.
Based on our interpretation of all the clinical data supporting NVX-CoV2373, including over 50,000 participants in clinical trials, we believe there is insufficient evidence to establish a causal relationship.
This may very well be true. The clinical set may simply be too small to state conclusively that the difference of 0.002% between vaccine (0.007%) and placebo (0.005%) was caused by anything but randomness. Note that I, personally, am assuming the worst case – that this difference of 0.002% IS IN FACT caused by the pseudo-spike-protein of the vaccine – and am saying that this is still NOT reason enough to not approve the vaccine. APPROVAL will very likely give us the VAERS data to PROVE that there is real risk to all the vaccines, but that it is LESS for Novavax and (if they ever approve it) Corbevax.
And note that I am talking about ALL RISKS – not just myocarditis. My money would be on Novavax being safer than mRNA vaccines in terms of every possible metric, including (very importantly) general immunity. I believe that mRNA vaccines have serious risks that would be REVEALED by approval of the Novavax vaccine.
We will continue to monitor all adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis.
Oh, that is a beautiful jab at Pfizer, which BURNED their placebo group.
What will you bet that Novavax is carefully protecting the integrity of their placebo group, because they’re not afraid of the evidence – like Pfizer/China?
Think very carefully about not approving Novavax, FDA. I’ve had your number for quite a while here. Better for you to swallow the bitter medicine of TRUTH, than to let this fester with a China-style cover-up that we will out on these pages every day for many moons.
How a Psycho Vaccine Marrying the Infamous COVID Spike Protein to HIV’s Neurotoxic gp41 Was [Allegedly] Canned by a Mere Testing SNAFU
How Australia Dodged The First Mad Vax Bullet of the WEF Scamdemic / Plannedemic
Darwin Award Vaccine Featured Insane Merger of HIV and COVID But Failed Due to Buggering of AIDS Tests, NOT Because of the Obvious Risks
Was It Ever Really For COVID? The gp41 HIV Protein is a TOP Target For AIDS Vaccines
How Science Monetization and Corruption Has Broken All Vaccine Safety Mechanisms and Made Sneaky Liars Out of Scientists
Mood Music
Intro – Prepare To Be Shocked
This is one of the craziest stories your either never heard, or barely heard. I am certain of the following. Nobody ever spelled out to you how NUTS this failed vaccine really was. This absolutely bonkers vaccine, that was almost used on all Australians.
The fact that nobody even followed this story, shows that the captured corporate media is absolutely not doing its job. Either THAT, or their job is to help deceive us.
And you know where my money is on that.
Surely, in the past, both journalists and scientists might have said something to the effect of “Hey – marrying a cardiovascular pathogenic bat virus spike protein and a neurotoxic AIDS protein in a vaccine to prevent a cold seems a little weird.”
BUT NO. NOT NOW.
And yet, some of us, few as we might be, might still have some questions.
We assume – ASSUME – as in ASS / U / ME – that all people in all of science are acting in all of our best interests all the time.
I have been completely broken of this spell, and I can tell you – what I can see now is not pretty.
I need to prepare you for what I’m about to tell you.
State of Corruption of Vaccine Science
First, a fantastic interview of Dr. Robert Malone by Tucker Carlson. It’s very folksy and long – a bit over an hour – but it will absolutely cure you of any idea that science in 2022 has not been almost totally corrupted by money, power, and SECRET AGENDAS.
This guy Malone is as close to a Moderna insider / honest outsider as you’re gonna get, and he clearly sees the dirty play from the Moderna point of view.
Hat tips to FG&C and GA/FL for keeping this video in play. Gail has been pumping this video, too. EVERYBODY need to watch this.
Indeed, let’s just save that tweet as an image, in case Twitter decides Jack is becoming too much of a liability.
One of the biggest BOOMS dropped in the video, IMO, is the fact that Robert Malone WARNED the FDA about the toxicity of the spike protein, and they SHRUGGED IT OFF.
Yes. Malone gave them documentation, as asked, and they came back to him and said everything was OK. And THAT is when he started to think something was very wrong.
We’re about to do it AGAIN – only I’m not the first – I’m just rediscovering an obvious “why the heck are they doing THAT” point.
But we’ll get to that in a minute. We need to broaden our list of corrupt suspects.
You see, corporate “science” isn’t the only bad actor here. What about governments that conspire with the corporations to “mandate” their products for a mutual PAYOFF?
It turns out that both Justin Trudeau and the Canadian government have a very large incentive in mandating the broken, dubious, and just plain BAD Moderna and Pfizer “vaccines”.
When you realize that Justin Trudeau is not only following his mandate madness for WEFfian ideological reasons, and for Papa Fidel power, but also for CASTRO CASH, you understand what’s REALLY going on.
SO – now that you realize THESE PEOPLE care more about other things, than they care about us, the following will make more sense.
The Frankenvax That Almost Was
So just today, FG&C posted THIS TWEET which made me go WTF…..
Basically, an Australian COVID vaccine that falsely triggers AIDS / HIV tests was recalled. The vaccine was NOT sent out for use by the public, because it gave people positive AIDS tests.
GREAT, but…..
WHY did the vaccine do this? And by the way….
Didn’t this happen BEFORE – like over a year ago?
I could have SWORN this happened before.
Is this OLD NEWS or a DIFFERENT VACCINE?
Or did they bring the SAME vaccine BACK?
Or even worse….. AND logic…..
You see, I remember something just like this bit of news, over a year ago. It was some vaccine from an Australian university that accidentally triggered AIDS tests.
Well, when I looked closer at this, it turned out to be THE SAME NEWS. Meaning that this recent tweet was just OLD NEWS.
HOWEVER – I happen to know a lot more now, a year later, so I dug DEEPER and FOUND MORE.
And now I want to explain to you, exactly what is going on.
Because this monster AIN’T DEAD.
VolksWackcine 451
Let’s begin by looking at the actual announcement that all this news came from. The paragraph in BOLD is the critical one. If you’re going to TL;DR past all the rest, read THAT paragraph.
Friday, 11th December, 2020: The University of Queensland (UQ) and CSL today announce that the Phase 1 trial of the UQ-CSL v451 COVID-19 vaccine has shown that it elicits a robust response towards the virus and has a strong safety profile. There were no serious adverse events or safety concerns reported in the 216 trial participants. However, following consultation with the Australian Government, CSL will not progress the vaccine candidate to Phase 2/3 clinical trials.
The University of Queensland commenced a Phase 1 trial of their COVID-19 vaccine candidate – v451 – in July 2020, to assess safety and immunogenicity in healthy volunteers. CSL was working towards taking responsibility for the Phase 2/3 clinical trial and large-scale manufacture of the vaccine, upon completion of successful trials.
The Phase 1 data also showed the generation of antibodies directed towards fragments of a protein (gp41), which is a component used to stabilise the vaccine. Trial participants were fully informed of the possibility of a partial immune response to this component, but it was unexpected that the levels induced would interfere with certain HIV tests.
There is no possibility the vaccine causes infection, and routine follow up tests confirmed there is no HIV virus present.
With advice from experts, CSL and UQ have worked through the implications that this issue presents to rolling out the vaccine into broad populations. It is generally agreed that significant changes would need to be made to well-established HIV testing procedures in the healthcare setting to accommodate rollout of this vaccine. Therefore, CSL and the Australian Government have agreed vaccine development will not proceed to Phase 2/3 trials.
The Phase 1 trial will continue, where further analysis of the data will show how long the antibodies persist, with studies so far showing that levels are already falling. The University of Queensland plans to submit the full data for peer review publication.
UQ Vice-Chancellor, Professor Deborah Terry, said while the outcome was disappointing, she was immensely proud of the UQ team who had shouldered a heavy burden of responsibility while the world watched on. “I also want to thank our many partners, our donors – including the Federal and Queensland Government – and of course the 216 Queenslanders who so willingly volunteered for the Phase 1 trials.”
UQ vaccine co-lead, Professor Paul Young, said that although it was possible to re-engineer the vaccine, the team did not have the luxury of time needed. “Doing so would set back development by another 12 or so months, and while this is a tough decision to take, the urgent need for a vaccine has to be everyone’s priority.”
“I said at the start of vaccine development that there were no guarantees, but what is really encouraging is that the core technology approach we used has passed the major clinical test. It is a safe and well-tolerated vaccine, producing the strong virus-neutralising effect that we were hoping to see.
So we will continue to push forward and we are confident that with further work the Molecular Clamp technology will be a robust platform for future vaccine development here in Australia and to meet future biosecurity needs.
Dr Andrew Nash, Chief Scientific Officer for CSL said “This outcome highlights the risk of failure associated with early vaccine development, and the rigorous assessment involved in making decisions as to what discoveries advance.”
“This project has only been made possible by the innovative science developed by world-class scientists at The University of Queensland and the strong collaboration between our organisations, and many others, over the last 10 months. CSL and Seqirus are committed to continuing our work to protect the Australian population against COVID-19. Manufacture of approximately 30 million doses of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine candidate is underway, with first doses planned for release to Australia early next year. In addition, CSL has agreed at the request of the Australian Government to manufacture an additional 20 million doses.”
UQ and CSL acknowledge the support of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) in partnering to enable the rapid development of the vaccine candidate through clinical trials.
So what they’re saying is that this vaccine – which uses the HIV protein gp41 – sets off HIV tests. And THAT made the test unacceptable to move forward. The remaining phase II and phase III trials were cancelled, while the phase I trials continued to finish collecting data.
And WHILE they say that the phase I testing showed that the vaccine was safe and effective, if you look more closely, they only tested it on 216 people.
We KNOW from the Moderna and Pfizer tests, that even after HUGE phase II and phase III trials, using thousands or tens of thousands of participants, there are serious side effects that are STILL not discovered until actual roll-out to the public, when millions receive the shot.
And that does NOT include long-term effects. We know NOW that this determination can be critical in many cases.
And one more point for the record. As you can see by the statement at the end of the press release, this vaccine was supported by the Bill Gates organization CEPI.
Yeah, that CEPI, and THAT Bill Gates.
Like I say, CEPI is how Gates gets TWO VOTES, and GAVI is how he gets THREE.
So the bottom line – this vaccine was killed because it set off AIDS tests.
But let’s dig a little deeper into that.
So What’s With HIV and the COVID Vaccines?
When I first heard about this particular Australian vaccine (UQ-CSL v451, or v451 hereafter) triggering HIV tests, my immediate thought was that this might be proof that the Indian researchers were CORRECT – that the spike protein really contained those four inserts from HIV, and that THIS was setting off tests for HIV.
Later, I heard that – no – there was actually some segment of HIV protein being used in the v451 vaccine INTENTIONALLY. Thus, the whole problem seemed stupid, the use of the HIV protein seemed short-sighted, and I promptly forgot about it. No smoking gun – just a stink bomb.
However, a year’s time changed all that.
Think how different the perspective is now.
virus almost certainly came out of a biowarfare lab in China with PLA/NIH ties
Fauci, Dazsak and minions now known to have LIED about origins
Fauci gang also lied when pooh-poohing the Indian HIV insert hypothesis
mRNA vaccines seem to be producing immune deficiency, a.k.a. “VAIDS”
there are working hypotheses now which explain immune deficiency
Fauci’s history with HIV mirrors current history with COVID – lies and hidden agenda
Fauci seems to be obsessed with immunodeficiency and vaccines
Fauci promoted bad killer drugs as treatments in both cases (AZT, remdesivir)
Fauci seems to have an agenda clearly counter to truth as we know it, and is likely serving something beyond the increasing “fake” science which the public believes is operant in the world, but which is very likely a “reduced set” intended to deceive us
Thus, with all that WEIRD background, it NOW seems a bit “par for the course” that somebody in that world would want to bring HIV into the COVID equation.
But is that a good idea?
Now – before I go talking about why this might be a BAD idea, I want to give you plenty of references as to why they SAY it was a good idea.
Let’s start with a good explanation of why the false positives occurred. This article includes a lot of information on the v451 vaccine itself.
The article mentions, without too much detail, that the HIV protein is part of a “molecular clamp” – a trimeric molecular “holder” of spike protein molecules. This holder allows three molecules of any attached spike-type protein to stay locked into a rigid, parallel conformation, which will remain in the desirable pre-fusion (with a cell) configuration, and not change into the useless post-fusion configuration.
The article also links to a scientific paper on the technology:
Prior to 2020, the threat of a novel viral pandemic was omnipresent but largely ignored. Just 12 months prior to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic our team received funding from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) to establish and validate a rapid response pipeline for subunit vaccine development based on our proprietary Molecular Clamp platform. Throughout the course of 2019 we conducted two mock tests of our system for rapid antigen production against two potential, emerging viral pathogens, Achimota paramyxovirus and Wenzhou mammarenavirus. For each virus we expressed a small panel of recombinant variants of the membrane fusion protein and screened for expression level, product homogeneity, and the presence of the expected trimeric pre-fusion conformation. Lessons learned from this exercise paved the way for our response to COVID-19, for which our candidate antigen is currently in phase I clinical trial.
Here is part of a really good graphic from the paper.
You can see how it’s possible to produce a spike protein with the “molecular clamp” attached, and then simply let this recombinant construction TRIMERIZE (form a triple, side to side) around the three molecular clamps, and thereby stabilize the three spike protein molecules next to each other.
This is a bit like a “motif” within an actual virus, where spike proteins, sticking out next to each other, protect each other’s sides. THAT is the basic idea of this thing.
Remember how Novavax assembles a bunch of spikes via modified ass ends into a kind of antigenic cloved apple, to create a kind of fake virus? Same very basic principle.
Indeed, the molecular clamp is even a bit like TWO motifs, since gp41 serves a somewhat similar purpose in the HIV virus, being the root of a stalk to an attack mechanism.
HIV-1 fusion process. It involves both subunits of the envelope spike complex. Notably, gp41 is shown in green with its transmembrane region buried in the virion membrane, both segments of heptad repeats (CHR closer to the virus and NHR closer to the host cell) before and after conformational changes, and the N-terminal end of the ectodomain in gray. In the last two panels pointed out by the red arrows, gp41 is observed following penetration of the host cell and following a conformational change resulting in the six-helix bundle which brings the viral and cell membranes into close proximity.
So – in a very real sense – this whole “vaccine” thingie is a literal marriage of HIV and coronavirus – the simplest possible one.
And they didn’t tell you ANY of this shit – did they?
So all of that WORKS, but the problem is that antibodies don’t just form to the attached spike protein – they ALSO form to the “molecular clamp”, meaning to the gp41 protein.
And what does that mean?
An AIDS Vaccine in Disguise?
The people who made the v451 vaccine say they didn’t expect there to be so much antibody response to the gp41 parts of the vaccine, thus triggering HIV tests.
You know what?
I don’t believe them.
I think they were gaslighting us all along.
Part of this is due to the fact that I’ve seen gp41 named numerous times as a potential basis for subunit vaccines against HIV. In fact, in one reference, I saw it named as THE BEST HOPE for an AIDS vaccine.
They didn’t mention that? LOL. OH, REALLY.
So WHY would anybody be using gp41 as part of an antigen, and not expect it to generate antibodies?
In fact, one might almost look at this v451 vaccine and regard it as an HIV vaccine, with spike proteins tacked onto gp41 as a kind of “nasty adjuvant” to initiate the immune response to the HIV protein.
Seriously – which is the real target here – COVID or HIV? Or BOTH?
This looks to me like a perfect example of…..
WAIT FOR IT….
“REVERSO”.
But let’s just set that aside for now, and pretend that the thing which COULD be a vaccine for EITHER ONE of the two things they stuck in it, is REALLY a vaccine for the fakey-fake cold that we don’t need a vaccine for, and NOT a vaccine for the sexual disease that stands in the way of Luciferian scum creating their polyamorous sexual paradise of literal epic random phuckery.
OMG, these people have just lied, and lied, and lied again. And they will KEEP lying.
But we’ll pretend they’re not lying, for just a little while longer.
So if we have an actual COVID vaccine here…..
…..is it a good idea to include the HIV gp41 protein subunit?
Well, after what we’ve seen with the spike protein, I was thinking maybe it wouldn’t be.
And it turns out, I wasn’t the first person who thought of this.
Doorless Carp’s Suspicious Cat In A Box
When I went looking for the toxicity of the gp41 protein, one of the first things that came up was some guy or gal who appears to have been actively suppressed on Twitter, eventually banned to Gab, and whose substack article on the topic has only two likes – ONE OF THEM MINE.
Doesn’t mean the article’s not important. And I think it’s about to get a few more hits.
This is a wonderful article that is simply SKEPTICAL of the entire “it was pulled because of triggering AIDS tests” reasoning.
DoorlessCarp read the same press release I cited above, and pokes and prods it from the point of view of somebody who knows a heck of a lot about HIV and AIDS, and doesn’t buy what (s)he’s reading in that press release. Something doesn’t sniff right to “them”, and “they” spell out the issues.
I will attempt to summarize DoorlessCarp’s concerns (noted as “DLC” hereafter).
First, DLC admits to actually being led to the problem by one of those Fake News “straw man fact checks”, which attempt to either “debunk” facts or mislead scandals by setting up an adjacent strawman and knocking it down. OBSERVE.
“Fact check: An Australian vaccine trial did not give trial participants HIV”
LOL. No. The truth they’re protecting is that the “COVID vaccine” gave them HIV antibodies, and it was very likely the whole point.
To quote DLC about the Aussie vaccine researchers: “I wouldn’t let these clowns dispense aspirin, let alone design fast tracked vaccines.“
DLC then makes this statement, noting that there is a curious skew between the reality of HIV testing and the idea that there is some kind of a problem here.
Interesting rapid response to the effect that antibody only HIV tests have long since been debunked as a diagnostic tool on their own due to cross reactivity from other antibodies. They don’t tell you anything useful.
DLC then quotes extensively from this letter which explains why HIV testing via antibodies is actually a rather horrible mishmash of false positives and negatives, ultimately requiring a clinical diagnosis and “validation by lifestyle facts”.
Which leads to the next section, which I quote:
So what was the real reason for pulling the Australian trial, was it the gp41 toxicity?
The antibody problem raises more questions than it answers as spike S2 has homology to P24, GP41 and GP120.
This is dark stuff, P24 has been ported straight across from HIVs capsid to the spike protein. Here’s the proof, at least as far as what specific antibodies are telling us, which don’t lie:
What is p24 antigen?
“One distinctive HIV antigen is a viral protein called p24, a structural protein that makes up most of the HIV viral core, or ‘capsid’. High levels of p24 are present in the blood serum of newly infected individuals during the short period between infection and seroconversion, making p24 antigen assays useful in diagnosing primary HIV infection.”
suspects the real reason for pulling the vaccine was the toxicity of gp41
notes that the spike protein already has potentially dangerous homologies to three HIV proteins, p24, gp41 and gp120
p24 is basically the nucleocapsid protein of HIV
p24 tends to be detected early in the AIDS process, before antibodies to it form
DLC then cites several papers demonstrating that there is already a lot of understanding of antibody cross-talk between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and either (1) original SARS-CoV proteins, and (2) HIV-1 proteins.
In the latter case, there is specific interaction with gp41.
References given:
The SARS CoV-2 spike directed non-neutralizing polyclonal antibodies cross-react with Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) gp41 (Dec. 2021)
DLC then lays the hammer down on the fact that gp41 is responsible for the dementia of AIDS.
I’m including the whole thing here.
Pathology:
Accumulation of β-Amyloid Precursor Protein in Axons Correlates with CNS Expression of SIV gp41 (2002)
“In this study, a strong association (p = 0.005) was identified between elevated axonal β-APP levels and the amount of SIV gp41 present in white matter, implicating HIV/SIV gp41 as a mediator of axonal damage.“
Mechanisms and Structural Determinants of HIV-1 Coat Protein, gp41-Induced Neurotoxicity (1999)
Abstract
Of the individuals with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, 20–30% will develop the neurological complication of HIV-associated dementia (HAD). The mechanisms underlying HAD are unknown; however, indirect immunologically mediated mechanisms are theorized to play a role. Recently, the HIV-1 coat protein gp41 has been implicated as a major mediator of HAD through induction of neurocytokines and subsequent neuronal cell death. Using primary mixed cortical cultures from neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS) null (nNOS−/−) mice and immunological NOS null (iNOS−/−) mice, we establish iNOS-derived NO as a major mediator of gp41 neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicity elicited by gp41 is markedly attenuated in iNOS−/− cultures compared with wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures. The NOS inhibitor l-nitroarginine methyl ester is neuroprotective in wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures, confirming the role of iNOS-derived NO in gp41 neurotoxicity. Confirming that iNOS−/− cultures lack iNOS, gp41 did not induce iNOS in iNOS−/− cultures, but it markedly induced iNOS in wild-type and nNOS−/− cultures. We elucidate the region of gp41 that is critical for iNOS induction and neuronal cell death by monitoring iNOS induction with overlapping peptides spanning gp41. We show that the N-terminal region of gp41, which we designate as the neurotoxic domain, induces iNOS protein activity and iNOS-dependent neurotoxicity at picomolar concentrations in a manner similar to recombinant gp41 protein. Our experiments suggest that gp41 is eliciting the induction of iNOS through potential cell surface receptors or binding sites because the induction of iNOS is dose dependent and saturable and occurs at physiologically relevant concentrations. These data confirm that the induction of iNOS by gp41 and the production of NO are primary mediators of neuronal damage and identify a neurotoxic domain of gp41 that may play an important role in HAD.
“I wouldn’t let these clowns dispense aspirin, let alone design fast tracked vaccines.“
Is gp41 a danger? It may well be. And nobody is asking the question, because (IMO) the neural pathogenic initiator that gp41 is, was passed off as a “molecular clamp” instead of the REAL ANTIGEN.
If they’re going to resurrect this weirdo COVID-HIV vaccine – and YES, they’re thinking about it – then there needs to be some examination FIRST of what the HELL is going on.
So What The Heck Is Going On Here?
When I was a young lad in the old days of science, there was lying, misrepresentation, and thievery, but it was on a much smaller scale.
We used to joke very cynically, back in the ’70’s, that every natural product being synthesized in a laboratory cured cancer, because we all knew that was not true.
We knew that these substances were really being synthesized merely because the molecules were a synthetic challenge, and a way for professors to make a name for themselves in synthetic chemistry. Almost NONE of these substances would EVER be used to treat cancer, and most would wash out very soon upon investigation. Almost none of them would ever even LEAD to a useful cancer drug. But LYING about their importance was how people got money for their labs. Every structurally interesting new molecule was always the next savior – until it wasn’t.
I used to think that the people giving out the money were fools about this, but not any more. I am beginning to think that the “givers” have always been just as corrupt as the “takers” – they’re just the “insiders” who turn on the spigots for their fellow “outsiders”.
I have no reason to think that vaccines are any different.
I think that a false crisis was used as a massive MONEY-BOMB – a global pile-on of the giddiest and most corrupt kind.
Probably the biggest one in 20 years.
I think that an AIDS vaccine was passed off as a COVID vaccine, by plausibly passing off the natural function of the HIV subunit as a new tool for other things, because – well – it IS such a new tool – just like every new interesting molecule MIGHT actually be some amazing new drug that cures cancer.
They lie skillfully, and they lie with truth, and it’s almost impossible to PROVE that the secondary “oh by the way” was actually the primary motivation.
We have changed from white lies that everybody understood WERE lies, to much more devious lies where scientists engage in fooling not just the public, but even other scientists.
I do think we have to wake up now. We can no longer afford the luxury of pretending not to know.
If I have to thank Joe Biden and his puppetmasters, including his “handler” Obama, for anything, it is for WAKING ME UP with these stupid mandates.
Nothing worked so well, to show us that the NEW WORLD ORDER is a direct threat to humanity, and needs to be stopped.
Science can be good again. But it must never, ever, abandon TRUTH.
Another post discussed how – for whatever reasons are quietly embedded upon the length of the full spike protein and fragments thereof, chimeric or not – we are also now cursed with what appears to be, to some [currently socially tolerable] extent, an abortion virus and abortion vaccines.
Trust me – THAT is a trumpet that BRINGS DOWN WALLS.
We may even have a scientifically sound explanation for the craziest reports of vaccine side effects in the close but unvaccinated – namely, hormonal activities that are operating at the low microgram level.
Oxytocin – abortion dose = 10-30 IU = 16-50 mcg
Let me explain how that works. Think “DUST”.
I can tell you all about the potency of carfentanil. ONE BREATH of inhaled dust containing a tiny amount of it knocked me out like a roundhouse to the left jaw. If that ENTIRE DUST had been carfentanil, I would have been DEAD. But there was a fraction – a tiny fraction – of that tiny grain you see right there, that got into my lungs, riding on OTHER DUST, and I was OUT LIKE A LIGHT.
NOW you understand the POWER of the spike protein.
Yes, there is SO MUCH that they HIDE FROM US to maintain POWER OVER US.
However, now I want to put ALL of this virology technology into DEEP PERSPECTIVE.
“Black goo” biological agent in the movie Prometheus, part of the “Alien” franchise.
What I am going to tell you is almost certain to shock you – both about the disease and about the vaccine. It shocked me. That’s why I figured I had to explain this to people.
And what’s even WEIRDER – this is not totally about the disease or the vaccines, but also about their CONTEXT, which forces you to SEE them both differently and more CLEARLY.
A while back, I was just browsing the “edutainment” about viruses on the internet, when I was led down an interesting rabbit hole of viruses in entomology. You know – INSECTS. I read something on Wikipedia which bothered me, so I set it aside. It all seemed FAR too familiar. It surely impacted all this crap we’re going through now – I just wasn’t sure how. Later I came back and read it again.
Now, I understand. It’s actually rather beautiful. But – well – it’s interesting.
The greatest point being – THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN.
The great irony of the idea “nothing new under the sun” is the self-referential part – the idea that EVEN this little bit of wisdom is with certainty not even attributable to its first alleged “author”, who HIMSELF surely understood the great irony of his saying it, and that others might attribute it to him, someday.
Nothing new under the sun. This bit of Solomonian passed-on wisdom about the curation rather than creation of wisdom is far truer than I realized. Let’s EXPAND just a bit.
The idea that this universe is as old as it appears to be, and that in all that time, Einstein was the first person (using the term rather broadly) to discover the logic of how speed actually works, strikes me as a violation of Solomon’s logic about “first discovery” being rare as hen’s teeth.
Likewise, Solomon’s logic goes further and tells me that “hen’s teeth” undoubtedly happened a lot more often than, when in its earthly rarity, it happened “here and almost now”, but seemingly only roughly once.
Rarity being somewhat relative, with distance providing a deceptive but effective cover for number and frequency, all of them together being a control of wisdom over knowledge.
Yet even these seeming corollaries of the idea of “nothing new under the sun” are just repeats of the idea with some frill on the edges enlightened for our benefit.
“…it is curiosity that gives meaning and savour to life.”
LIFE. Seems to be part of the design. No?
Have I BOTHERED you yet?
Maybe even a bit of trepidation – or even FEAR?
Good. THAT has happened before. “Nothing new under the sun.”
You can never go wrong with Solomon.
The Last Time Gene Therapy Was Reinvented
I keep trying to tell people – DNA is very smart. We are slowly learning how to talk to it. Sometimes we actually listen. Sometimes we even plagiarize.
DNA bargains and wheedles its way into the future, changing in whatever ways it has to, to keep itself alive. It gains as much vision of the future and the past that it can, using proteins, to persist as well as it can.
Think of it this way. DNA fights and feuds with DNA, but who wins in the end?
DNA.
NOTHING that these foolish young humans are trying to do with their coronaviruses, their “vaccines”, and their “gene therapy” is new to DNA. DNA came up with ALL of this stuff – AGAIN – at least 100 million years ago. THAT was its destiny. Ironically repeating like its own form.
I am absolutely serious. The technology of EVERY one of our wonderful new coronavirus vaccines (or “injections” or “gene therapies”, if you prefer) was RE-invented by DNA approximately 70-100 million years ago on this planet, and is still around.
ONE example of a prior reinvention of gene therapy resides in a tiny biological war-game where THREE organisms cut a deal that keeps them all alive. I will point out all of the “original versions” to you, and you will see where human science basically plagiarized.
One of the three organisms is an insect – a kind of wasp – that gravitated into using a living host for reliable reproduction. The second is a voracious plant-predatory host insect – a caterpillar – that needs a dependent predator to keep its numbers in steady balance, because it won’t do it itself. The third is a virus that found a way to survive by helping insure that the host-guest “life transfer” process always succeeded, so that it, too, would survive.
DNA uses ALL OF THEM to optimally persist.
The key to understanding all of this, is a kind of virus called a “polydnavirus”. I personally like to pronounce that “Poe-LID-na-virus”, even though that is wrong. They’re actually supposed to be called “Polly-D-N-A-virus”. My advice is pick whatever you like – you’re probably never going to have to say the word publicly – and on the internet, your canine pronunciation is always perfect.
Or just call them PDVs.
Wikipedia’s entry for them is an excellent place to start.
The bottom line is very simple. The wasp lays its eggs INSIDE a caterpillar by injection. However, instead of injecting a mere venom along with the egg – a kind of chemical weapon – the wasp injects a venom containing a VIRUS – a biological weapon. The virus provides biological effects like immune suppression that HELP the wasp egg survive, hatch, and grow. This is much more efficient than merely injecting, say, immunosuppressive proteins in the venom. The immune suppression by the virus prevents immune response by caterpillar cells known as hemocytes.
All of that is shown in the following graphic.
Here is one of the first really fascinating aspects of these polydnaviruses. When they are in the wasp, they are actually PART of the wasp genome. That’s right. They’re IN THE WASP’S CHROMOSOMES. The virus is now PART of the wasp’s genetics. One could even view it as the wasp sending PART OF ITS OWN GENES into the host, to make sure that the egg survives.
When the virus is still inside the wasp, it only comes out of the genes and reproduces in one place, in FEMALE wasps, near where the eggs are formed. It doesn’t harm the wasp, because DNA is NOT stupid. Viral DNA learned – the hard way – don’t shoot the pilot. Just stay in your seat until it’s time to debark. Wasp DNA learned – the hard way – let the jihadists sleep until we get to the airport we want them to shoot up. All of it mediated through the most annoying code in the world, with zero comments and nearly inscrutable, almost accidental language.
You remember those “well, it works” phone calls, coders. “I don’t know. Try this.”
Now – the next point is even cooler – because it’s the exact same strategy as the coronavirus vaccines that use viral vectors (e.g., Johnson+Johnson, Oxford/AstraZeneca, Sputnik V).
The infection does not lead to replication of new viruses, rather it affects the caterpillar’s immune system, as the virion carries virulence genes instead of viral replication genes.[4] They can be considered a type of viral vectors.[5]
The virus particles that are sent into the caterpillar are NOT reproductive – they are merely infective. They don’t code for creation of new virus, which might reproduce exponentially and kill the host or use up too many resources. Instead, the infective non-reproductive virus particles – just like the coronavirus vaccines – give a nice, predictable amount of expression of new proteins, useful for the wasp eggs and larvae to prosper. The virus basically CONSERVES caterpillar so that it has a ticket and a ride OUT of the dead caterpillar when it’s all over.
That’s the EXACT same strategy as our mRNA and DNA vaccines. Don’t crank out too much spike protein, by cranking out any new virus, and thereby kill the host. The main point is SAVING the host. The point may also be STERILIZING the host, to some extent, because THAT protein effect is beneficial to the injecting parasites known as the Democrat Party, globalist banks, and China. And probably more than one type of pencilneck. But they do want us to live – at least for some time, it would appear.
But seriously – the wasp polydnavirus immunosuppression strategy IS the human adenovirus vaccination strategy.
The only difference is what the proteins that are created DO. In the caterpillar, they suppress the immune system response to the egg or larva. In humans, the one protein stimulates antibodies to itself, and possibly does other things which are intended or not.
So you may be wondering how the virus gets from parent wasp to child wasp if the virus that is sent into the caterpillar host is not reproductive. AHA. It is because the virus is tucked into the GENOME of the baby wasp, safe and sound, for a ride into the future. The virus genome is essentially protected by the wasp.
Thus, you can see how genetic incorporation of the VIRUS benefits BOTH the wasp and the virus – and even – in a weird way – the caterpillar. The wasp gets to control the genetics and expression of the virus, so that they don’t cause the wasp too much trouble, but instead yield maximum benefit. The virus can then be more effective at its now exclusively delegated task of immune suppression in the caterpillar, by relinquishing reproduction to the wasp. Division of labor creates a great mutual dependency, but it also creates a strong contract.
One could say that genetic incorporation is a STRONGER CONTRACT between the virus and the wasp.
Just like genetic incorporation of COVID-19 spike protein could be a STRONGER CONTRACT of reduced human fertility.
But how does the caterpillar benefit?
The caterpillar is not going to live on as THAT particular caterpillar, but THAT particular baby caterpillar-culling wasp will live on in an assured 1:1 trade-off, and the REST of the caterpillars which benefit by the current culling will also live on as a stable population. The C-W-V balance is maintained BETTER by seeking a more stable chaotic resonance, without the wild swings of boom and bust, if wasp reproduction and population can be more closely tied to the caterpillar population, and they all live into the future without wild swings in numbers.
Another way to view it from the caterpillar perspective, is that viral efficiency minimizes the number of sacrificial caterpillars needed to keep the necessary number of wasps alive.
Now – we’ve seen viral vector vaccines analogous to the non-reproductive but infective polydnavirus virus particles – those would be the Johnson-+Johnson, AstraZeneca, and Sputnik V vaccines, which use adenoviral vectors for non-reproducing, protein-creating, virus DNA. But what about the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines?
Well, it turns out that these {{{wasps + viruses}}} invented ANOTHER way to get DNA or RNA into the caterpillar host – those are called VLP, for “virus-like particles”. There is a lot of range and variability here, just as there is in non-viral-vector vaccine technology. So in the same way that the Pfizer, Moderna and Inovio vaccines use proprietary “virus-like lipid droplet nanotechnology” to get their mRNA or DNA into human cells and thus cranking out spike protein, wasp/virus DNA can also use a strategy of “virus-like particles” that don’t even mimic non-working viruses, and STILL get their effective DNA transferred to the caterpillar, to effect the desired expression of needed wasp/virus proteins in the caterpillar.
Now – that is not to say that PDV (polydnaviruses) and VLP (virus-like particles) are the only tricks up the ovipositors of these parasitic wasps. It turns out that – in addition to these well-described DNA viruses, there are also apparently RNA viruses which ride along with wasp eggs during injection. So YES – both DNA and RNA “vaccines” are part of the wasp injections. And YES – there can be genetic incorporation in the caterpillar cells – for their short lifespan – just as there is already genetic incorporation, long-term, in the wasps.
Remember – who wins? DNA WINS. The HOUSE always wins.
But don’t forget Novavax! It may just be protein, but protein shills for DNA!
Not only are the Novavax “pseudo-viral protein-based nanoparticles” already examples of virus-like particles – they are matched by protein-based components of the wasp venom, both free-floating or otherwise. Indeed, one cannot read about the virus-like spiked particles in this wasp venom and not think that Novavax design is pretty much the same thing.
NOW – this is all a LOT to unpack. Not just that, but my “dumbing it down” probably made it just plain dumber. To correct that, I’m going to let the experts FIX THINGS UP.
The field of polydnaviruses in insects is NOT a huge field. It’s actually rather obscure, despite the phenomenal importance we are witnessing now. Just as the media can help those in power hype and control a field like climate science, or literally HIDE certain other fields like [[[ COUGH ]]], they can obscure still other fields which radically affect you, by hiding them pretty much in plain sight.
There is a BOOK that reviews the field, however, which is EXTREMELY helpful.
You can download parts of this book, and that includes TWO parts which are more than enough for a reasonably smart normal person to see the CONTEXT EXPLAINED.
Let me get ONE of those parts out of the way because you’re not going to be interested in this, unless you’re ready to get VERY nerdy on the history of science. But I am including it because it is AMAZING STUFF. You might view this as “The history of the science of the rediscovery of all the evolutionarily discovered technology used in the “vaccines” or “shots” or “gene therapy” of the coronavirus genetic injections”. It’s a beautiful window into HOW SCIENCE WORKS.
You can download a PDF of this at the linked page.
Now – if you read that – you will get a LOT, including a window into the slow and painful nature of research, but it’s a bit difficult to extract the good stuff if you’re not used to reading scientific review literature.
In contrast, the PREFACE of the book is MUCH easier to read, and it puts ALL this stuff in context that normal humans who are not experts in polydnaviruses can understand.
I highly encourage you to read the full preface at the linked page. But what I’m going to do here is simply pull out all kinds of juicy quotes – which is damn near the whole thing. [ My comments ] and identified WOW sequences will be in bold.
Here we go – this is all quoting:
Among parasitoid viruses, the fascinating models of polydnaviruses (PDVs) were discovered in the 1970s and the new field of polydnavirology was thus opened.
This field has been moving very fast since the beginning of the century thanks to the use of genomic approaches and rapid expansion of accessible databases on insect and viral gene sequences.
Parasitoid and viral genomic studies have confirmed that PDVs are functionally gene transfer agents used by parasitoid wasps to manipulate the physiology of their parasitized lepidopteran hosts by introducing modified versions of their own genes into host cells.
In the case of PDVs from braconid wasps, this kind of gene therapy (detrimental for the patient, which is in this case the lepidopteran host!) originated from the integration of a virus genome in a wasp genome ca. 100 million years ago. [LOL – I just noticed this “being impressed by the date” part – looks like we BOTH realized this independently. -Wolf]
This virus has been modified to incorporate wasp genes instead of its own viral genome in the nucleocapsids inside the viral particles. [Minor beef here – ownership and original genetic penmanship on the payload could be more “virus” and less “wasp” – interesting problem.]
Such use of viruses as vectors has been selected several times independently during the evolution of parasitoid wasps. [There it is. VIRAL VECTORS. Invented by DNA.]
The PDVs associated with braconid and ichneumonid wasps (Campopleginae subfamily) are unrelated as judged from the machinery producing the particles, and they represent an example of convergent evolution with different viral origins.
A third association event is suspected to have occurred in the Banchinae subfamily of ichneumonid wasps. In essence, the parasitoids have ‘captured’ viral elements that have evolved a host regulatory role that benefits the parasitoid to facilitate successful parasitism. [This is more “archaeopteryx” on the payload being of viral origin.]
Other associations with viruses or virus-like particles might have evolved with different organisms but they have not been unraveled yet, and parasitic amoebae that have associations with mammalian viruses are just one example. [“Lots of room at the bottom.”]
Many insects have evolved associations with a large number of species of bacteria such as Wolbachia and associations with viruses have been less well studied to date compared to bacterial symbionts.
A number of different viruses are found in the genital tract of the parasitoid wasps and conceivably they could be transferred to female wasps by behavioral traits, such as host feeding, initiated following ovipositor puncture of the surface of the integument.
Host feeding may thus be an advantageous behavior for viruses which facilitates their spread within insect populations and this intimate association with viruses might have favored interactions leading in some cases to integration of viral sequences into the wasp genome, although most of the wasps described in this book are no longer host feeders.
These viruses include RNA viruses of insect parasitoids and most of them appear nonpathogenic. Could these likewise have evolved a symbiotic relationship with their host? Future research may reveal such an intimate relationship with the wasp host carrying them but, currently, we have little information about their functional role as symbionts or pathogens in the virus–wasp–insect host relationship. [This was in 2012 – the situation could be different now.]
While the study of polydnaviruses was initially inspired by the pioneering studies of George Salt and Susan Rotheram at Cambridge University, more recent studies of Venturia (formerly Nemeritis) canescens particles (the virus-like agent studied by George Salt) by Otto Schmidt and Sassan Asgari documented that these virus-like virions lack both DNA and RNA; the particles are comprised of proteins encoded by parasitoid genes. [This is basically virus-like particle nanotechnology akin to the Novavax vaccine.]
The multiplicity of different molecular forms seen in these viruses and virus-like particles is truly amazing but, compared to polydnaviruses, we have less information about the biology of virus-like particles and how they function. [There is clearly an infinitude of possibility here – clearly WHY the push for gene therapy.]
Finally, not all parasitoid species are associated with viruses and most in this category have to rely on virulence factors produced by their ovaries and venom glands instead of using the host to produce them like for PDV-encoded gene products. [Translation – most of the wasps use plain old venom.]
PDV-associated species also produce venom that was shown in some cases to synergize the effect of the virus. [Combination biological and chemical weaponry.]
New sequencing approaches are more comprehensive and will thus allow comparisons of the arsenal of proteins used in different species, which will enhance our understanding of the dynamics of evolution of parasitoid virulence strategies. [Big data will allow spying on the past to happen even faster.]
Ectoparasitic wasps have not been examined yet for the presence of viral symbionts, and appear to have exploited venoms as a source of host regulatory molecules instead. Comparative studies on paralyzing versus nonparalytic venoms are lacking, and screening ectoparasitic species for viral elements should also be a future research priority. [Translation: there’s more to learn from regular stinging / paralyzing wasps.]
In addition to enhancing our knowledge of parasitoid strategies and increasing our understanding of the importance of symbiotic relationships in species evolution, parasitoid viruses and venoms may constitute a source of new molecules to control insect pests. This might be a revolutionary outcome of research on PDVs and other parasitoid viruses, since the safety of many chemical pesticides with respect to their detrimental impacts on human health and key species in the environment such as bees and other beneficial insects, is questioned. [You think proteins are going to be safer? HA! Get ready for new problems.] We anticipate that harvesting biopesticidal molecules from parasitoid venoms will likewise prove fruitful. [Translation: All this human wasp techno coronavirus lying crap is headed to agriculture, and presumably already there. Yeah.]
Finally, we hope that this book will satisfy the reader by presenting an overview of the most recent findings on all these topics presented by an international assemblage of authors. [You can say that again!]
In addition, we aim to inspire many future researchers to choose polydnavirology or studies of other parasitoid viruses or viral-like elements and venoms as their focus field. [You’ve inspired me, even though it’s a bit late for me to enroll in one more Marxist university.]
That’s it.
I tell you – this whole thing was a revelation. Suddenly, everything these people in Big Pharma have been doing has been HUMBLED BY GOD, using BUGS. LOL! Pretty amazing.
And being humbled, all of us, the TRUTH now becomes clear.
Now – if all this seems a bit scary, but you’re thinking “Hey, this isn’t exactly like our case, in which Democrats mind-fracked their victims with an RNA virus” – well, HOLD YOUR BEERS. With God – IRONICALLY – all things are possible.
Yes, this, too – baffling the victim with an RNA virus – was borrowed from nature, although I am being just a wee bit facetious, since it was done much more intelligently and much more socially against a more intelligent and social species.
The Case of the Shanghaied Babysitter
Yeah, I’ll try to keep this one shorter, but I don’t really have to go back TOO MUCH to the original literature here.
Here is where I FOUND this case originally. An article that was COPIED onto a forum.
This is actually a very long and complete scientific article. Let me give you the “TL;DR” version.
When the wasp lays an egg in the ladybug, it also injects an RNA virus. That virus makes the ladybug go “mask Karen” crazy, and stick around and GUARD the pupated larval wasp after it emerges from the ladybug and cocoons. The ladybug may then even kick the virus and go on living after the young wasp departs.
Yeah, let me HIGH FIVE that long-hauler ladybug.
Just sayin’.
Democrats.
SPIT.
SO – where are we now?
Is Phony Gene Therapy About Population Control?
We have now looked at the COVER PRESENT (coronavirus and vaccines), the EFFECTIVE PRESENT (spike protein virus and vaccines), the LIKELY DEEPER MOTIVATING PRESENT (contraceptive / abortive virus and “vaccines” that look pretty much like public “health” gene therapy), and the PURPOSED ORIGINAL HONEST PAST (infection and/or genetic modification of the injected to produce desired effects using RNA viruses and/or specialized viral vectors) – the latter insect past being a lot like what is happening now.
Are you ready for the FUTURE?
Well, there’s a lot of range on that. Maybe it’s THIS…..
Now I know a lot of y’all are, like me, saying “Yeah, that will be a cold day in hell!” But let’s consider it anyway. It helps to understand things.
WHY would Hillary say this, about Trump’s possible winning in 2016?
What crime could POSSIBLY send hundreds of historic conspirators to some horrible fate like what happened to the NAZIS? They would have had to have done something even more horrible – right?
Well, viewed in “holocaust” (small “h”) terms, an “abortion virus” followed by “abortion vaccines” might count.
It’s a pretty ingenious idea. If you honestly believe that overpopulation threatens the planet, and that stopping it “by any means necessary” is justified, then the idea of:
taking a modifiable cold virus but…..
don’t call it that, so people will be AFRAID
warm up the FEAR CROWD with SARS, Ebola, Zika, etc.
use a cold with its own moderate antiprogestogenic or oxytocin hormonal activity, or some other way of exerting a contraceptive or abortive activity
optionally increase that activity
release the virus
create vaccines with the same effect
require ongoing vaccines to titrate the effect on society
To me, this is very much like the wasp strategy, only instead of hijacking the juvenile butterfly with immunosuppressive negative gene therapy in a PRO-FERTILITY strategy for its own offspring, what the Democrats are doing is an ANTI-FERTILITY strategy using progestosuppressive negative gene therapy on basically all humans who are not in on the scam. And they also used an RNA virus to mess with our minds, though THAT was a bit artful, shall we say.
Now, I think the success or failure of their operation is going to depend on the ultimate level of contraception that is achieved here. The effect on society will depend on whether the Dems, globalists, and Chinese are trying to pull off a very steep and fast population drop that would generate a social immune reaction, or a long, slow, incremental one that would not. We probably won’t know this for several years.
But just consider this “back of the envelope” calculation.
Let’s say that Demmunists require 2 coronavirus boosters every year. Say that between compliance and effectiveness, ONE of those boosters is effectively pregnancy-blocking for any pregnancy currently in process. Run this over all of humanity, so that once every year, every woman is hit with a “menstruation and miscarriage vaccine” using the spike protein. With a pregnancy window of 75% of the year, that target is the broad side of a barn, as long as CDC continues to insist that it’s safe for pregnant women, or women who are trying to become pregnant. You would get massive observable menstruation and miscarriages after vaccination, and the plot would not last.
It’s not a SUSTAINABLE LIE.
BUT – as long as the effect is random, subtle, and single-digits, it can be hidden by a compliant scientific community, which is socially conditioned to reject the truth. Even bigger, control of social media, communications, and other avenues of discovering the truth, mean society can be kept completely blind to a subtle population control.
But seriously – reducing the fertility of humans by 5% is a BIG DEAL. It doesn’t mean it’s the end of it. It’s a GOOD BEGINNING – from their point of view.
You’ve got to look at this thing, like you’re trying to pull it off, to see that you really COULD pull it off.
And if we could pull it off, they will pull it off.
So – that’s where I’m at.
And if I’m right, they will NEVER FACE JUSTICE for what they’re doing.
So here is a rule about Democrats.
Democrats, China and other communists will always pick an unjust fait accompli over a just agreement.
Thus, as long as they do things where the price of tolerating their crimes is less than the cost of a civil war, they will just keep doing those things.
Is Persistent Reverse Transcription a Hidden Virus/Vaccine Objective?
Gloating Pre-Preface
There are few feelings of satisfaction like opening up the NEWS and knowing one’s theories and understandings are WORKING even better than one thought.
Let’s see if they use this one for damage control, and get the “new science” out before the STORY OF THE SCAM gets ahead of them. CDC is lying to us so badly. SO badly.
It’s all good, people. I’m on these bastards like BLACK on TAR.
Notice that the governor’s WIFE also tested positive later. But most importantly, notice how the news never asks the RIGHT QUESTIONS connecting the vaccine to the positive test. Instead, we get LIES.
The FAKE NEWS is going along with this crap. They are so deep in this.
Yes, we are now in peak MITHRIDATISM that they wanted to turn into the MIDAS TOUCH of SPIKE PROTEIN.
Such a SCAM.
In my opinion, the CDC should be CLOSED as a CRIME SCENE.
Thank you, Greg. You are a SCIENTIST, and when you felt SYMPTOMS you forced them into coughing up the DATA that reveals how badly they SCAMMED us, and how badly they continue to scam us.
I think Fauci knows exactly what I know. He could tell you EXACTLY why this happened. And once Rand Paul reads this, he’ll know, too. Somebody needs to start cornering Fauci on all this crap.
It ALL goes somewhere.
LOOSE SCIENCE that you know and everybody else doesn’t is a MAGIC ACT. BAD FAUCI!
I’m seeing into the psy-op, people. I’m seeing so deeply.
THE SPIKE MUST FLOW. AND FLOW AND FLOW AND FLOW. It’s the KEY to the SCAM.
Once you see the spike protein CORRECTLY, you see why they do everything they do.
How much you want to bet Bill Gates is wise to this stuff?
Real Preface
I have come to the conclusion that something is very wrong with COVID-19 and the vaccines thereof, and I think I’ve finally put my finger on the scientific macguffin that ties all the skeevy, sketchy stuff together – reverse transcription.
That would be that little red arrow back to DNA from RNA.
It turns out that reverse transcription, and vaccines for diseases that might code for it, are very “Fauci”.
Learn to code. It’s KEY.
Too many things “political, organizational, governmental, and media” have not added up about the phony “plague”. Going beyond that, too much SCIENCE about the “novel coronavirus” and vaccines being offered for them, simply did not add up.
At least, not until now.
It’s not my inner conspiracy theorist which is finding a problem here – it’s my inner scientist. I am having great difficulties rationalizing certain seemingly careless choices which have resulted in some of the most problematic and badly framed medical offerings since “eye of newt” and “really large leeches for anemia“.
I am having a scientific problem with TESTING that is so bad – so intentionally bad – that it borders on the freaking Ouija Board.
And FAUCI KNEW.
It’s all the result of DISHONEST SCIENCE.
Background: “Science Is Real”
I’m not exactly anti-science, having worked in science all my life. I’m not even opposed to “transhumanism”, which I don’t think is inherently and necessarily BAD. The idea of expanding my memory without putting Google or Facebook or anybody else in charge of it? Talk to me. I’m listening.
I’ve ALWAYS gotten the flu vaccine – ALWAYS. I NEVER miss it. That’s not exactly transhumanism, but it shows that, for most of my life, I had great TRUST in medical science. In fact, I would even say I still do. Generally speaking.
I’ve had vaccines for everything I could get – even the RABIES vaccine, when I was bitten by a bat. The rabies vaccine is, in fact, one of the STRONGEST defenses of vaccination in medical history. No vaccine opponent WILL or SHOULD turn down the rabies vaccine – it is a HUGE success story in medicine. If you get bitten by a rabid animal, the rabies vaccine promptly administered against that SLOW virus will SAVE YOUR LIFE. Some vaccines are of arguable worth, but the rabies vaccine is not one of them.
Indeed, I consider myself to be something of a gourmet, or at the very least a connoisseur of vaccines. Previous “reviews” of vaccines on this site have featured my lovely assistant, Miss Direction, néeRetroculture, who helps me convince people that vaccines weren’t always questionable, and might even be good for people.
Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and ANTI-VAX at the same time. I mean, what’s the use of FREE SPEECH if we can’t use it to troll EVERYBODY – including PENCILNECK? Whoops – WRONG PENCILNECK. Let’s try …
Perhaps you recall my PREVIOUS correspondence and “review” of the new, two-shot shingles vaccine, Shingrix – or more specifically, my review of the FIRST SHOT. Wolf’s Hot Date With Retrosynthetic Dinopox Hey, it’s not every day that I get to post something that’s not only about the unspeakable issue of vaccines, but is both PRO-VAX and …
I was anticipating getting one of the new coronavirus vaccines – and was holding out for the first one PROVEN to be safe for recoverees from COVID-19, one of whom I happen to be.
My lungs aren’t that good anymore – not after COVID-19 seared them like some kind of biological chlorine gassing on the front lines in France. I have to be very careful. Another case of COVID, or pulmonary / vascular coronavirus vaccine side effects of comparable severity, might actually “finish me off”.
So – I’m SHOPPING. And I mean SMART SHOPPING. I’ve been paying a LOT of attention to the new vaccines, and trying to understand their technologies, their benefits, their risks, and the science behind them. I simply can’t afford to make a mistake on side effects. Not if I want to enjoy the retirement for which I worked LONG and HARD.
I already knew quite a bit of the science behind COVID and the new vaccines – enough that it has been easy for me to follow the scientific news about these things. I’m not a virologist, an epidemiologist, a vaccine expert, or a molecular biologist, but I’ve worked with such people for much of my life. I picked up a few key ideas in the process. I’ve also come up with a few scientific ideas and principles of my own, but that is largely because I’m a devotee of the history of science, which gives perspective on science.
If you don’t think science can be WRONG, and that large numbers – HERDS – of scientists therein, can go OVER A CLIFF, just take a look at Planet Vulcan, Lysenkoism, The Great Leap Forward, and science in the Third Reich – a seminar on the latter having been quite instructive in my youth. It was not simple how the scientific masses in Germany were led astray, once socialist politics DRAGGED, PUSHED, and SCARED them away from “Jewish Science”. The top echelons of German science, filled with Jews and their friends and spouses, were forced into horrible choices, as some of the best science and scientists were politically rejected over a real social stupidity which fractured and destroyed what was arguably the leading scientific nation on the planet.
None of that had to happen – but it did.
Don’t think we’re immune from scientific debacle. We’re not. Socialism is the greatest “hold my beer” knucklehead that science ever green-lighted into a dysfunctional relationship. He’s always coming back on Saturday night with roses and cherry vodka, after the “last” last time he wrecked Science’s cute little sports car.
Science normally checks itself for errors – and it is my contention that the checking needs to be extensive – all the way out to society as a whole – including stakeholder scientists, non-stakeholder scientists, and even the non-scientific public at large. Sure, you can skip the non-stakeholders and the public, but is it wise? Hardly, in my opinion. The smaller the group needing to be fooled, the easier it is to accomplish things which society simply does not want, or which have vast intended or unintended consequences.
Yuri Geller proved that scientists are easy to fool. James Randi made that point even more strongly. And I have my own take on it, which adds pushy and manipulative politics of any kind as a RISK to science. The same “sale by urgency” which works for salesmen at the appliance store, works in science. Many of us – particularly those of us with historical perspective – saw this problem in climate science. Now, we see it in COVID and vaccines. We are being rushed into something, for some reason. The questions are WHAT and WHY.
I’m going to assume that most people reading this, have started to grasp enough of the basics of viruses and vaccines, and particularly the new mRNA and DNA vaccines, that they don’t need “the way things are supposed to work” explained to them. Indeed, if you go out, and absorb all the “mainstream” journalism on COVID – science sites – mainstream media – cable networks – your favorite non-conspiratorial “science guys” – fact checkers – explaining the way things are SUPPOSED TO WORK, you will be thoroughly and smartly educated by excellent science.
If you want, try this great link courtesy of Ethical Skeptic, one of my favorite “dissident scientists” out there, pulling us back from the current “woke Lysenkoism” we seem to be in.
Good summary of the unique structure of the Spike Protein mRNA vaccine and how it differs from the Coronavirus' Spike Protein RNA in pseudouridylyl Ψ and synonymous codon stealth.
See? Yeah, I’m a grade-A conspiracy theorist, because I told you to look at Snopes, and not some clickbait site saying these vaccines are injecting nanobots into you to turn you into something non-human.
The PROBLEM with the conspiracy theories on vaccination isn’t so much DIRECTION as it is MAGNITUDE. It’s all over-reach. Silly, perhaps well-intended, but self-discrediting overreach. Much of it is clickbait or psy-op. A lot of it is actually true – at some small level – often orders of magnitude less dramatic than the headline claims. I can talk to the consumers of such in terms they will understand, and I’m generally talking them DOWN and BACK to what are more scientifically grounded problems with the new vaccines. And there are some. Which is the POINT of this entire piece.
In this essay, I am now talking primarily to what might be called “vaccination normies”, who are – like me – normally rather trusting of vaccines, but perhaps feel like there’s something not quite right about the current situation. These are people who have SOME vaccine hesitancy, but are likewise leery of TRULY baseless skepticism of science.
I’m talking about the people who put “SCIENCE IS REAL” yard signs out in front of their houses. There is a side of me that likes that. However, there is a side of me that wants to put out a sign that drops LOVE IS LOVE (Pedo? No way!) and all the rest, and sticks to what I know about science from the inside:
SCIENCE IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC FRAUD IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC GREED IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC BIAS IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC ERROR IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC DECEPTION IS REAL
SCIENTIFIC SELF-DECEPTION IS REAL
SCIENCE IS REALLY MESSED UP
SCIENCE IS STILL BEAUTIFUL
You see what I’m sayin’? You want SCIENCE, you get the whole, lovely, crazy, smart, dumb, dysfunctional bimbo who thinks she can handle SOCIALISM, and ends up on some frat party lawn in a lab coat and a mini-skirt, throwing her shoes at strangers, demanding somebody take her home, and SHE’S NOT DRUNK.
Yeah. I knew that crazy, wonderful bitch.
Wolf’s Take on Coronavirus Vaccines
You can check out my posting history here to follow the chronology of my thinking on coronavirus vaccines, but I’ll try to recap toward my current thinking, and what seems to be wrong with them. I am going to lead you up to my last post on the vaccines, where I almost saw what I’m seeing now, plus a whole bunch of other stuff.
PREFACE I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT. The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – …
The first news that really grabbed me was about Inovio – a DNA vaccine – a “Bill Gates” vaccine (almost all are, TBH) – and thus one of what I will refer to as genetic vaccines. Such vaccines are not supposed to work by modifying one’s genes or genome, despite the word genetic. They simply exploit cellular biochemical processes CLOSER to the genes, using the known biology of genetic expression. They dump DNA or messenger RNA (or a close facsimile thereof, to be more precise) into existing cellular processes, to “fool” the processes into creating – in the case of the current coronavirus vaccines – a stabilized form of the spike protein of the virus.
At the time, I noticed that these would be THE FIRST genetic vaccines being tested in or deployed successfully in humans. And this is where things get “iffy”. Just a little bit.
The next vaccine to get into the news in a big way was Moderna – an mRNA vaccine, again using a full and slightly stabilized spike protein as the antigen, but created in vivo via the mRNA genetic instructions thereof. While Moderna seemed to be successful in its first clinical trials, the side effects were noteworthy, frequent, and fairly significant – even compared to the notoriously “spicy”, arm-reddening-and-bicep-swelling, shingles vaccine, Shingrix. As one respected “pro-vax” scientist of my old acquaintance put it, they would have to kill him to give him the Moderna vaccine. He was definitely thinking the same thing I was thinking. Rush job, problems, keep looking.
My initial hopes quickly moved toward Novavax. Novavax is NOT an mRNA or DNA vaccine. It uses the same full stabilized spike protein strategy as the others, but it provides the spike protein AS spike protein, using a nifty little nanochemical “pincushion” to hold the spikes in an outwardly facing array, thus to engage receptors properly and at LOW DOSAGE. This is an excellent strategy that AVOIDS the unknowns of mRNA vaccines like Moderna, or DNA vaccines like Inovio or Russia’s Sputnik V.
The most significant risks of spike protein vaccines like Novavax are the risks of the spike protein itself, NOT of abusing the genetic processes to CREATE the spike protein in vivo, like Moderna. Indeed, Moderna scientists admitted in one of their first papers on their vaccine, that there ARE unknown potentials for long-term side effects with mRNA vaccines. Go find the paper – it’s there. They couch the admission in gentle and somewhat obscuring language, but the disclaimer is there. It has to be. They’re being honest.
mRNA vaccines in animals have not been uniformly free of side effects, to put it VERY kindly. We can argue about the severity of those side effects, and whether they extrapolate to humans, but I suppose we will find out now. The risks are there, and they tend to be long-term. So – in full disclosure – there are RISKS to mRNA vaccines. The older you are, the less the long-term risks matter, and conveniently, the higher the risks of COVID-19 itself. That’s a good thing. It means we only have to take the risks with those patients who can most likely afford them.
On the flip side, why the hell we want to take huge, unnecessary risks to vaccinate children is beyond me, but I’ll save those arguments for another essay. Or look at my LAST essay. Those arguments are, in part, subtle “history of vaccination” propositions that would bog us down right now.
In contrast, Novavax doesn’t take those risks. It’s a more conservative vaccine. This is why it jumped to the top of my list. An entire class of risks – the genetic processing ones – were automatically removed. As a “nothing can go wrong or I’m likely DEAD” vaccine recipient, I appreciated my better chances with Novavax.
BUT as a “real” scientist, I am not just swayed by THEORY – I love the results of EXPERIMENT. Thus, when Pfizer’s clinical trial results came out, I was IMPRESSED by the excellent antibody levels and the almost minimal side-effects. Far from being an arm-burner like Moderna, Pfizer was looking to be much milder on short-term side-effects, with stronger adverse effects being downright RARE. The large population of test subjects also implied that a recoveree LIKE ME was likely in the study by accident – and NO deaths or severe reactions occurred – definitely a GOOD SIGN for my case.
This not only bode well for lower likelihood of some kind of lethal short-term reaction due to my recoveree status – the smart scientific position would be that lower short-term risk very likely reflects lower long-term risk – and this supposition is completely absent ANY “knowing” causative reason to connect them.
Thus, Novavax and Pfizer were at the top of my list. Things were looking GOOD to take a vaccine, even if I didn’t get an explicit study on safety in recoverees.
And THEN reality started to hit.
Yes – when millions of doses of a vaccine go out, there are going to be deaths and injuries. We have a system in place – let’s be honest – which tries to HIDE the minority reports on vaccine adverse events, in order to keep buy-in on vaccine compliance. That doesn’t mean people should stop getting vaccines, any more than reports on horrible vehicle accidents OR the “hiding” of such accidents on the back pages of newspapers, mean that we should stop driving.
Nevertheless, my scientific curiosity was piqued. We DO have COVID vaccine problems now, and MORE than seemed to have been revealed by the vaccine trials.
WHY NOT DO SOMETHING ABOUT THEM?
I repeat. Differently. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH BETTER VACCINES.
Taking stock of the many positives and negatives associated with THREE VACCINES which gained the most initial experience – Moderna, Pfizer, and Oxford/AstraZeneca – I noted three things, one from each.
Moderna – side effects sometimes REMARKABLY resembled COVID-19 itself – even up to SEVERITY.
Pfizer – nursing home patients were testing positive AFTER vaccination – some dying of COVID symptoms
AstraZeneca – hematological problems reminded me of another protein hemotoxin – snake venoms
I could go into deep details about these observations, but in TWO of the cases, it was VIDEOS where the “light-bulb” finally went on. So let’s look at some videos.
Moderna: Ben Stein’s vaccination experience
As I was listening to Ben, I was stunned. He was describing COVID-19 – at least from my perspective. This was not coincidence – this was SPIKE PROTEIN.
WHOA, NELLY!!!
Note that Ben is still “pro-vax” here – he’s just CAUTIONING people about REALITY.
Pfizer: Nursing Home CNA describes correlation of vaccination to later positive diagnosis and death
This man, a CNA in a nursing home, reported online what he had observed, amidst great personal anguish about “whistle-blowing”. He observed that he had protected his elderly patients for all of 2020, but when they finally got the Pfizer vaccine, many of them just started “testing positive” and DYING. He was NOT buying the management line that there was a super-spreader – if you listen to him, he’s fully contemptuous of the idea. He was CERTAIN it was the vaccine.
I agreed with this guy – a TRUSTED SCIENTIFIC REPORTER, in my opinion. His GUT was telling him that the chronology was one of correlation. He was very likely seeing in his mind a pattern in a delay over TIME, integrated over cases, that could only be explained by the vaccine itself. He was NOT accepting the management excuse of a “super-spreader” fortuitously infecting the vaccinated, to give that same result. THIS GUY is my kind of scientist. SKEPTICAL of ad hoc, contrived, politically correct explanations that don’t explain all the facts and observations in a clean, natural fashion.
AstraZeneca: Rare but serious clotting reactions are enough to evoke CONCERN from medical professionals
I think THESE DOCTORS in the following video represent my position extremely well – the problems with the AstraZeneca vaccine are RARE, but we KNOW there is a correlation, and it is our DUTY to stop and fix the problems, weighing in particular the relatively lower risks of COVID-19 itself in younger patients, where these events are occurring.
The difference between IGNORING the rare thrombocytopenia incidences and FIGURING THEM OUT is the difference between Stalinism and responsible popular government.
I truly admire these front line doctors for their SCIENTIFIC BALANCE. Frankly, I consider front line doctors to be scientists of the highest order, just like that CNA in the video above. PRACTICE is what matters – not DEGREES.
Now in this latter case, the AstraZeneca vaccine, I dragged in what I consider a very useful analogy to hemotoxic snake venoms, but I didn’t really see WHY this would be happening – until I found something that explains ALL of these problems.
I just didn’t realize I was holding an ACE.
The Macguffin – Reverse Transcription
In March of 2021, I reacquainted myself with a paper that I had noted when it came out, in December of 2020, but had not fully grasped the significance. The authors clearly knew that what they had found was a big deal, and worded the title appropriately, but even then, I don’t think they dared consider the possible deeper significance of their finding.
Nobody can FIRE ME from retirement, so I’m quite willing to say what needs to be said. Could it be wrong? Maybe. But if it’s RIGHT, there are issues that need to be dealt with. So let’s go there.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
Liguo Zhang, Alexsia Richards, Andrew Khalil, Emile Wogram, Haiting Ma, Richard A. Young, Rudolf Jaenisch doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516
I will refer to this paper at “the Jaenisch paper” – after the main author to whom correspondence is written – not because I don’t want to credit the fortunate and likely excellent first co-author Zhang in this instance, but because there is another paper I talk about all the time, dealing with masks, that I call “the Zhang paper“.
THAT one – the mask paper – in an embarrassingly good journal – is a piece of crap – some of the worst “political science” ever – designed to virtue signal to the CCP-DNC narrative of election-fraud-assisting masks, in utter contradiction to the very data presented by the authors.
The Jaenisch paper, in contrast, opens up a barn door that I am sure both industry and “in bed” government wants closed, Closed, CLOSED.
Stated very bluntly, the paper says that the virus behind COVID-19 actually “changes the genome” of victims – similarly to, though not exactly like, HIV.
You know – that OTHER disease for which Fauci was so interested in creating a vaccine.
And not only that – the COVID-19 virus does it enough to throw off those damn PCR tests that Kary Mullis warned us about for the exact same reason. In fact, the solution of that aspect of testing – the way “test-triggering fragments” just hung on and on and on in recoverees – is one of the BEAUTIES of the Jaenisch paper. The conclusions of the paper explain very neatly certain OBSERVATIONS and scientific conundrums that were first found by Korean scientists, who were very very persistent in proving that their COVID patients were NOT getting reinfected, as the fear-mongering American media “wanted”, but were still testing POSITIVE while being NON-INFECTIOUS.
Now we have a wonderful explanation. Excellent scientific work. THIS is why I signed up for science!
The THREE-TRILLION DOLLAR QUESTION that nobody wants to ask, however, is whether the genetic vaccines based on mRNA or DNA of the viral spike protein do the same thing – meaning get incorporated into the genomes of recipients. Well, do they?
Ever? Sometimes? Always? Or even just enough to make a difference?
It’s a great question! That deserves a CLOSE LOOK with MUCH SIDE-EYE.
I will say this. Even if these vaccines only get incorporated sometimes, that would make the “crazy people” yelling “OMG THESE CORONAVIRUS VACCINES ARE GENETIC MODIFICATION!” become suddenly – oddly – scandalously – CORRECT.
I find that incredibly ironic.
BUT WAIT – THERE’S MOAR. And then, there is EVEN MOAR STILL.
The Spike Must Flow
I had set the Jaenish paper aside in my mind in January 2021, as I was busy being pursued by the FBI as an “insurrectionist”, having wanted to see “fellow dissident scientist” Dr. Simone Gold speak at the Capitol Building on January 6, 2021. Rather luckily, I never found her, or realized where she was. Had I found her, I would have likely been arrested and all that nonsense, since she wandered, far too trustingly, into the interior of the Capitol building.
This old wolf, too wary to go into buildings – too old to play tug-of-war games – too injured to stand up to direct pepper spray – settled for singing the Star Spangled Banner at over 100 decibels with tens of thousands of patriots outside – which was an absolutely surreal experience.
But back to the story.
When I began seeing more and more vaccine problems by March of 2021, some of the possible answers seemed to point to the WHOLE SPIKE PROTEIN being the BAD ACTOR. The trouble was, I needed disease-producing levels of it. How might THAT be happening?
Look at Ben Stein. He was injected with only a small amount of COVID spike protein mRNA, but had disease like I did, when, in my case, the virus ran wild making BOTH spike protein AND more virus from it, in my cells.
The vaccine does NOT create any new virus. It does NOT have the full virus instructions. JUST the main one – the spike protein that provides a significant part of the viral shell.
Thus, the vaccine cannot create an EXPONENTIAL GROWTH of the spike protein, which the VIRUS does. The full virus creates more and more virus, meaning more and more spike protein, until something – immune response – shuts it all down.
The vaccine creates a few “fountains” of spike protein – basically “vaccine-infected” cells – but these get shut down as immunity builds. It never really gets out of control. Or at least, not normally.
So, for Ben Stein to have a powerful, disease-like experience, he needs cells that are cranking out far more spike protein than we would normally expect with the vaccine.
Well, if the INSTRUCTIONS for spike protein – in some people – got a bit upstream of just “slipping them into the print shop queue”, to where entire new print queues of spike protein and substantial, chimeric, problematic chunks thereof were being repeatedly ordered from DNA central operations, it would explain a whole lotta spike protein and associated chimeric junk being produced – more than anticipated.
And – I think I would be remiss if I didn’t consider the possibility that some of these bogus DNA instructions might be hard to shut down completely, thus providing an explanation of “long haulers” and “immunocompromised variant generators” beyond their known suffering of what can be rightly regarded as “simply” chronic damage from initial infection.
But let’s move on the to Pfizer nursing home case, and many other reported cases like it.
If we’re getting genetic incorporation of vaccine spike protein instructions at the DNA level by reverse transcription, like the Jaenish paper, perhaps in older individuals who are more susceptible to this problem, then it explains them testing positive later – and in some cases – if they can’t shut it off – DYING LATER.
Now – here is where KINETICS comes in. Kinetics is basically process flow rates. I talked about KINETICS in my LAST RANT on COVID-19, in which I began to put all this stuff together, but didn’t really put forth the totality of things until the comments section at the end of the post. I mentioned in the body of the post that the kinetics of viral interference didn’t seem to explain the nearly complete disappearance of flu while COVID was still significantly above herd immunity levels. It just felt to me that BOTH of these would shut down with greater similarity, if viral interference was the sole explanation. In that case, CDC lying to us about flu vaccine efficacy, understating the success to increase compliance, COMBINED with viral interference, provides a nicer (IMO) explanation of the observed kinetics.
Now, in the case of partial genetic incorporation, the kinetics of interest would be how fast the body shuts down spike protein production by cells without genetic incorporation, versus shutting down cells where there WAS genetic incorporation. If cells with significant production of spike protein due to genetic incorporation were not just sources of more spike protein and more symptoms, but also harder to shut down than “unincorporated” cells, and elderly people were increasingly subject to genetic incorporation with age, we might actually see the AGE-VACCINE DANGER relationship that is being seen in nursing homes, where the most elderly patients are at significantly greater and AGE-INCREASING risk from the mRNA vaccines – something we absolutely don’t want.
Are you starting to see why this explanation works for me?
Genetic incorporation of symptom-producing protein instructions by mRNA vaccines of the FULL SPIKE PROTEIN seems like a REAL WORKHORSE OF AN EXPLANATION.
And, if you’re following my reasoning, you can see that this can also explain the odd cases of thrombocytopenia in some younger patients getting the AstraZeneca vaccine.
In the AstraZeneca case, we would be seeing rare cases where spike protein production after genetic incorporation was just cranking away at levels reminiscent of hemotoxic envenomation by crotalids – or in English, snakebite, which is also (in certain snakes with certain proteins) characterized by thrombocytopenia.
I will tell you right now – there MAY be very similar cases in older patients – maybe not – but I suspect that such cases are less “systemically identifiable” in older patients where thrombosis is more “normal”, and will be more likely attributed to age and NOT the vaccine.
And here is the kicker. In all of these cases, because of the chimeric nature of the fragments noted in the Jaenisch paper, there is a certain RANDOMNESS which could be responsible for the random responses seen in different individuals and different vaccines, which by using significantly different mRNA vectors, may result in significantly different levels and exact circumstances of genetic incorporation in different individuals.
NOW – if it turns out that there IS genetic incorporation of vaccine-origin stabilized spike protein mRNA or DNA as genomic DNA, like the virus itself, then one of the first suspects for reverse transcriptase activity or induction thereof, would be the spike protein itself.
And THAT, my friends, opens up a REAL can of worms.
The Full Spike Protein Monty
Let me ask a really impertinent but really obvious question – something that Tucker Carlson is famous for.
Why are we vaccinating people with the WHOLE spike protein, or more precisely, stabilized analogs thereof?
OK – now I’m being a LAWYER here. I am asking questions to which I ALREADY know the answers, and in particular, the answers that Tony Fauci might give. Here is my argument on behalf of Fauci.
“We don’t really know EXACTLY where on the spike protein, might be the BEST place for antibodies to attack. Also, we don’t really have time to start guessing, when we can just use the whole thing. Most of the labs are modelling the whole molecule, and sharing data. It just makes sense that everybody sticks to the same model, so that any advances that one lab makes, can be quickly adopted by the other labs and researchers. If we begin using fragments of the spike protein, then results are going to be harder to interpret from lab to lab. There will be fragmentation of the science as well, and this will slow our response time tremendously. Comparison of results will be much more difficult. The timeline to a vaccine could be extended by months – even years. Maybe never……..”
See how that works? I would make a fantastic lying science bureaucrat – I know all the tricks already, because I used to negotiate compromises that result in the status quo in fake science in other ways.
Now – HERE is the superior counterargument that will LOSE because Tony Fauci is in control. For this argument, I’m a FRONT-LINE DOCTOR. Maybe I’m even Simone Gold, or one of the various doctors I followed back during the HCQ Wars.
“Yes, that’s all fine and good. But we are doctors, administering a VACCINE to patients. Adverse effects are real, and we want to minimize them. The spike protein is almost certainly the cause of much of the endothelial damage by this virus. Anything we can do to avert that damage is smart, including NOT using the full spike protein or analogs thereof. If we know the primary sites that antibodies need to attack, which we actually do, we can just use shorter peptide sequences or protein fragments constituting those sites. Modeling can make sure these fragments present the same, active, pre-fusion conformation. We can stabilize as needed to prevent immune enhancement, just like in the full spike protein. This shorter peptide approach has been successful in hepatitis vaccines. These peptides can be created quickly and formulated as vaccines in roughly the same time as the full protein. In fact, vaccine expert Winfried Stoecker has already done this, using the receptor binding domain of the spike protein, and creating a short peptide based on it. Since this technology is well-known, we don’t have to take any of the risks of messenger RNA or DNA technology. Nor do we have to use adenoviral vectors or new lipid nanodroplet technologies. Likewise, all of the advances in stabilizing pre-fusion conformation in the full spike protein can be used for the RBD peptide, so the risks of immune enhancement will be just as low. So, unless you can give us a reason to stick with the toxic spike protein, I’d say this is a no brainer.”
At least, that’s the way it looks to me.
Now, here are some interesting facts.
First, EVERYBODY is doing the full spike protein. The ONLY party that made a vaccine using less, was Prof. Stoecker, and he got in trouble for it, with the German government, because he wasn’t properly authorized, even though – well – normally he just does vaccine work and that’s that.
Second, you should note that – IF the spike protein has any reverse transcriptase (RT) activity, that activity would likely have been LOST by switching to a small peptide dropping most of the molecule.
Third, you should note that – by switching to a small peptide, there is no mRNA or DNA corresponding TO that peptide, so there is no chance it will be genetically incorporated.
By now, it is VERY clear to me, that the industry picked the vaccine technologies that it did, precisely because they were modern and untested, and they needed an “emergency” to get these technologies into use, in preparation for their big goal – actual gene therapy. But – AND LOGIC here – that does not preclude there being even MORE motivation here. The more I see this “event”, the more I see everybody getting bought in by SOME new aspect of the scam.
Using a more conservative approach would have been SAFER, but it would not have advanced the technologies that were groomed to be advanced. Even the Novavax protein-based vaccine, fairly conservative, tests the novel use of nanoparticles to assemble the pseudo-spike proteins into cell-infective starburst patterns. It, too, is full spike protein.
But again, THIS. Everybody is ALL about the full spike protein.
Let’s ask WHY.
A Feature – Not a Bug
Now – if the Jaenisch work is good – and I think it is – and if genetic incorporation of vaccine mRNA into genomic DNA also occurs – and I strongly suspect it does – and if the spike protein itself is responsible to at least SOME degree in causing genetic incorporation – which I also think is very likely – then I am of the opinion that Fauci knew exactly what he was doing in pushing mRNA and DNA vaccines that code for the full spike protein, and that he did so as a sneaky way to get a reverse transcription promoter into the human genome.
Why? I don’t really know. Not yet. But this whole thing just seems intentional in its ELEGANCE.
This is easily expressed in logical hacking terms. Fauci uploaded a stealthy FTP uploading tool into humanity’s genetic account. FIRST as a problem, with China’s help. THAN as a solution, with the industry’s help.
The idea of “uploading an uploader surreptitiously” is just elegant. It’s HACKING. Any person who ever had to “learn to code” has to admire it. And it’s doubly elegant by doing it TWICE.
Stated in biological terms:
Create a genetic vaccine for a same-same disease, both containing the genetic sequence of a reverse-transcription promoter, such as a reverse transcriptase, as a way of creating a persistent or at least consistently available presence of a reverse transcription activator in humans.
And the beauty of this scam, is that it’s “WHOOPS” played TWICE. VIRUS, then VACCINE.
Let’s enjoy it! Scenic route…….
FIRST the disease – OH, NO, LOOK WHAT BAT SOUP DID!
The ChiComs are masters of psychology on Americans. First they whip up the cultural WTF.
THEN they whip up the OTHER side of Americans saying “don’t hate on Asian cultural differences!”
THEN they pull the whole offering back, with everybody left high and dry on CCP zoonotic transfer garbage narratives, minus “bat soup”, but including pangolin “look squirrels”, when the REALITY is that humanized animal models are almost all that is actually used for this kind of viral research any more (thanks to Mary Morse for this fantastic point).
Wuhan lab. Put ALL your chips on it.
MASTERFUL MANIPULATION, and many American academic scientists fell for it like soldiers on leave in a brothel district.
THEN the cure – the vaccine – which uses the SAME genetics to get MOAR of the uploader installed in MOAR people.
And if they get caught….”OMG, DID WE DO THAT? WE JUST FOLLOWED THE SCIENCE AND THE DISEASE! FULL SPIKE PROTEIN FOR THE WIN! IT’S *** SCIENCE *** !!!”
Introduction You have GOT to see the video I’m going to show you. It’s not just what they’re talking about. It’s WHERE IT LEADS. Most of the people who watch Rand Paul go after Fauci here, are concentrating on MASKS, because that is the TOP LAYER of the argument. But THAT is the small potatoes. …
Something is going on here, and it seems too purposeful to be mere incompetence.
SO – Does Wolf Take the Faucipox Vaccine?
Now – I’m gonna tell you – CRISPR-Cas9 vaccines are coming, and THOSE are straight-up genetic engineering. Save some ammunition for that fight. But right now, I think it’s worth bringing up some PRETTY TOUGH QUESTIONS about the current vaccines.
Simply stated – aren’t things with reverse transcription activity a RISK, like HIV, and why would we court that risk in a SOLUTION like a vaccine?
And what’s with all the LIES to keep people from noticing that the VACCINE causes positive tests in recipients, “because spike protein, sequences, PCR, and [COUGH] maybe a little incorporation”.
C’mon. This is so obvious now, it’s PAINFUL. CDC is not even looking foolish. They know this stuff isn’t the disease – it’s the vaccines. They’re LYING.
Sheesh. The whole thing is an outrage.
So. Am I going to take one of the current vaccines?
Not if I think there is a reverse transcription activator coded for in the mRNA or DNA, or even if it’s just in there as PROTEIN.
I’m quite good with my natural immunity, which sadly may ALREADY include some uploading of the uploader. I have no idea if I have any genetic incorporation from the virus already, but if I do, I know exactly where any future positive PCR test is coming from.
Anyway, thank you, Kary. You were right all along. They ABUSED your work.
I thought that I might withhold this post on Easter Sunday, and then I changed my mind, thanks to Deplorable Patriot, Trump, Gab and Jesus. If anybody ever FOUGHT on Easter Sunday, it was Christ. It’s time to FOLLOW POINT.
The Branch Covidians have taken a toll, but the WAR is turning, and – somewhat in honor of the Branch Davidians who were SET UP and MURDERED by the globalist scum, it’s time for some JUSTICE.
I look at the people of this blog – many of whom HAD COVID-19 or whatever – being forced by socialist idiocy to take a vaccine that seems to show the most side effects in those who had the virus, and I am ENRAGED.
WHY? Where has science gone? Who will stand against this insanity?
The PEOPLE of America, LEERY OF THE LIARS, need to STAND against being subjects of the world’s greatest socialist medical experiment since Mengele and Auschwitz. The CHINAZI SCUM and their GLOBAL PUNK ALLIES who created this convenient misfortune – who seared my lungs to take my freedom – will not get away with this. It’s time to FIGHT BACK HARD.
LIKE TRUMP.
This is a long post that will, like vaccine side effects, expectedly yet unexpectedly rock a lot of people’s little worlds, so buckle up.
We take out something rather large in the intro, to “train the guns”, and then move on to Bio-9/11.
INTRO
The name Branch Covidians just suggests itself for the madness of turning a secondary sub-flu into a phony super-plague, but the truth is, the PLOT to pull off this MIND-FRACK was neither mad nor stupid, and goes much, much deeper than the abusable psychology of the people who were predictably ginned up as Mask Karens and Vaccine Custody Kens.
An example of why a chapter in the book is titled “The Branch Covidian Cult” https://t.co/OX9X4R0eZy
The roots of what was intended to be the first biological endless war, lie in the previous kinds of endless war. So let’s start there, with the endless war on guns.
If you know how Hillary Clinton was researching the apocalyptic Branch Davidian sect before the Clintons even got into the WH, then you will have a leg up on what I’m doing here and why I’m doing it. However, to nip this stuff in the bud, we will use PEACE, not VIOLENCE.
Observe.
You will see that the people running in with the convenient and money-moving solutions were, once again, the people who orchestrated the convenient problem.
I am learning to FIGHT LIKE TRUMP, and I’m going to SPREAD THE TECH, so to speak.
KNOWING THEIR M.O. is really starting to pay off for our side, and combining that with NUKES (of the information kind) and KNOWING WHO TO NUKE – which isn’t always the guiltiest party, but frequently the most STRATEGICALLY VULNERABLE…..
Sometimes being an escaping Buffalo lets you hear more than your friends Fly or Wolf.
…..is a real form of force multiplication.
Let’s get distracted by the “Branch Covidian” analogy for a second. This goes somewhere. Like the Branch Qvidians we were supposed to be.
Thus, to go back to the Clintons, we see a “future-proves-past” application of the Alinsky technique of freezing and isolating a “bad guy” was used on the Branch Davidians to go after guns, and yet in the beautiful way that Hillary Clinton always SCREWED UP…..
…..the other side was left in a kind of political debt which they never really got out of, and IMO that is part of why the GREAT AWAKENING is actually a thing.
This is not to say that the other side wasn’t able to keep pushing historic CRAP into the blender…..
…..or to subvert the American military and FBI almost fully into their designs…..
…..combined with some aspirin factories that eventually became a headache when a wolf sniffed some bottles in the rubble…..
…..thus realizing how this all connected to a repeatable and rather portable scam of creating security-state-monetizable bad guys who require us to give up our freedoms at the same time everybody gets robbed…..
…..however, the more beautiful part, in the Wolf’s opinion, was how much Great Awakening happened between THAT little incident and the NEXT bad guys – ISIS.
Why, one doesn’t think this much ACCEPTED REVELATION…..
…..happened all by itself, does one? Of course not. Some guys named “Q” were almost certainly doing quite a bit of work during that second Obama term that was supposed to be so fundamentally transforming.
I cannot claim credit for realizing that the tactical maneuver of Trump’s supporters to their political demise on January 6, 2021 at Capitol Hill, in Washington, DC, was something known to American historians and anthropologists as a buffalo jump. However, as soon as I heard the ill-fated demonstration called that, all my questions about what …
…..happened – perhaps with a little buffalo-tipping…..
….. and it became clear not only how prefabricated this little REICHSTAG was…..
Alternate Title: Bring Out The Owl! We continue with Part 2 of the Buffalo Jump series. For background, see Part 1: If you want a TL;DR version of what was wrong with the Capitol Rally on January 6, 2021, imagine trying to fit a million people into the little area numbered “8”, in the upper …
…..and that certain “white hats” who went along with this shit aren’t “uniformly” “white hats” (thank you, Scott)…..
Alternate Title: The moment I realized that GOD would back me in going asymmetrical on these unworthy China-compromised “U.S.” military bastards. I have recently come into possession of information which made a lot of things start making a lot more sense. I only needed a final confirmation that I was correct – and I just …
…..and how all the old parties involved in prior “events”, seem to be involved in the new ones…..
Impeachahontas Now Wearing Two Diapers Nobody expected Chris Wray to play Mafia Nan’s queen of diapers face-up on January 6, but that is exactly what appears to have happened. The only question now is WHY. To quote a friend from a former life, “AYE-YI-YI!” OK – let me back up a bit. First, I want …
…..then it ALL started coming together that We, The People had actually FORCED the “monetizers of created bad guys and events” to bring their little schtick a little closer to our little home on the range.
Please add links, tweets, videos, etc. for ALL identifications, charges, arrests, prosecutions, and sentencing of those who were at or in the Capitol Building on January 6. I’m finding a TON of this stuff hitting the media right now, and I’d like to keep it all in one place. This includes *JOURNALISTS* (CNN or others), …
Now – this here buffalo has to tell you – the Great Mystery might get a little pissed off if this guy…..
…..(that would be the OTHER QAnon garbageman) is going to be blamed for the sins of all the folks inside that building behind him, including this lady…..
…..as well as other potential information warfare targets who might be able to put a lid on this shit by backing the fuck off before alliances are deservedly shattered….
…..and by this shit, I mean where QAnon (QA) and other patriotic American groups are supposed to be the next Al Qaeda (AQ), in a kind of globally forced implosion on America, because we can already see that the money-grubbing phony “national security” people, who sure seem a lot more like global leeches, including a bunch of pseudo-American Brits and Aussies (OK, let’s be kind and show a DIFFERENT one with a 5-letter name)…..
…..every bit as phony as the Chinese American “citizens” who spy for the ChiComs – are just chomping at the bit to come down on AMERICAN PATRIOTS who can see what’s REALLY going on, having been the victims of a little bit of, what might we call it, maybe “Britcasting”?
…..which didn’t exactly work…..
…..but hey – sometimes it’s better to surprise the burglars and robbers, and instead of going after THEM, just put a round in the ATM machine, so it stops spitting out the bills!
…..and it’s not like the Great Spirit needs to use the crude methods of self-infliction used on that fine September day, because – in this case – self-infliction happened on a fine January day, and at a lovely place a short ways away from the ATM, indeed, at a place where I sang the Star Spangled Banner, written the LAST TIME some Brits tried to burn Congress down, only that time without any chumps in polygonal buildings, and not trying to pass it off as having been the work of American patriots.
ARE WE REACHING AN UNDERSTANDING YET?
Good. I have actual [American] [and ironically global] National Security WORK to do, which is not simply cleaning up absolutely unnecessary shit. But I did have time for an intro, which allowed me to skip a fuller and more blatantly obvious, accusatory, evidence-filled, and alliance-rending post. Some people should be thankful that I’m as lazy as I am.
TL;DR- = BTFO
SECOND INTRO
Now it’s time to get down to some science – the purpose of all this.
COVID-19 is both real and a scam, and that’s why it’s hard for people who’ve been deprived of AND LOGIC their whole lives to decide which one it is. It’s not one or the other – it’s BOTH.
The entire subject of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 reflects this conjoined reality of truth and falsehood. Almost every aspect of this subject is both REAL and A SCAM. Every piece of the puzzle appears to be both TRUE and FALSE.
One might expect such a cunning thing, in YET ANOTHER MONETIZATION PLOT.
Are you seeing why I had that other intro? Good. What we have here, is ANOTHER fake bad guy – albeit rather microscopic – being used to gin up ANOTHER fake event, but a whole lot of REAL MONEY.
OK, I’ll admit it. Maybe it’s just REAL FAKE MONEY.
Better? Yeah, I like that better, too. Because I like REALITY, and that includes REAL MONEY.
Which seems to be becoming a bit POPULAR lately.
COVID-19 doesn’t want to answer questions. People who need solid answers FAST will not get them. People who need satisfying answers will have to wait. However, they won’t have to wait much longer. CRACKS are forming in stonewalls. Stories are being whispered by data. Many theories and ideas dry up and blow away, but some are sticking around, and appearing fundamental.
This post is NOT going to explain the basics of viruses and vaccines. THAT will be another post.
This post is going to throw some HONKIN’ HUNKS of precious metals, and some BIG-ASS diamond and sapphire pavers, through some MASSIVE picture windows – and these objects will just pass through glass to your amazement. I am going to CHANGE YOUR VIEW of this disease in fundamental but GOOD ways. Ways that tell you REAL NORMAL is still there, like it always was, and all this other BULLSHIT is an illusion.
I’m going to challenge your fundamental thinking about this disease, hopefully so that you “can’t unsee” certain ideas.
Are you ready? Here we go.
I will start off with an idea that will be used, very admittedly, to GAIN CREDIBILITY, by showing you where somebody SMART could have been EVEN SMARTER.
*** 1 ***
Resisting The Vaccination of Children And Supporting Natural Immunity Is Valorous
One of the absolute best things that President Trump ever did was to bring Dr. Scott Atlas aboard, as a common sense counterweight to the plotters Fauci and Birx.
And I mean PLOTTERS. When I’m done with this post, you’re going to want to see Fauci and Birx in prison. They will be lucky to get off with simply losing power. But when you see what REALLY happened – how DELIBERATE DECEIT about Influenza-Like Illnesses (ILIs) was weaponized against the world, to get rid of Trump and advance the Democrat, Globalist and Chinese political agendas, you will also see that the only way this could have been possible, is by deliberate misrepresentation of the facts to President Trump and America.
Fauci and Birx HAD TO KNOW. In my opinion, they felt that it was SO NECESSARY to get rid of Trump, that they were morally justified to hide the truths that they hid from us.
Well, we will let the justice system be the judge of that.
And, of course, Trump knew. I love that he finally got a chance to LET THEM HAVE IT.
The following is adapted from a speech delivered on February 18, 2021, at a Hillsdale College National Leadership Seminar in Phoenix, Arizona.
The COVID pandemic has been a tragedy, no doubt. But it has exposed profound issues in America that threaten the principles of freedom and order that we Americans often take for granted.
First, I have been shocked at the unprecedented exertion of power by the government since last March—issuing unilateral decrees, ordering the closure of businesses, churches, and schools, restricting personal movement, mandating behavior, and suspending indefinitely basic freedoms. Second, I was and remain stunned—almost frightened—at the acquiescence of the American people to such destructive, arbitrary, and wholly unscientific rules, restrictions, and mandates.
The pandemic also brought to the forefront things we have known existed and have tolerated for years: media bias, the decline of academic freedom on campuses, the heavy hand of Big Tech, and—now more obviously than ever—the politicization of science. Ultimately, the freedom of Americans to seek and state what they believe to be the truth is at risk.
Let me say at the outset that I, like all of us, acknowledge that the consequences of the COVID pandemic and its management have been enormous. Over 500,000 American deaths have been attributed to the virus; more will follow. Even after almost a year, the pandemic still paralyzes our country. And despite all efforts, there has been an undeniable failure to stop cases from escalating and to prevent hospitalizations and deaths.
But there is also an unacknowledged reality: almost every state and major city in the U.S., with a handful of exceptions, have implemented severe restrictions for many months, including closures of businesses and in-person schools, mobility restrictions and curfews, quarantines, limits on group gatherings, and mask mandates dating back to at least last summer. And despite any myths to the contrary, social mobility tracking of Americans and data from Gallup, YouGov, the COVID-19 Consortium, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have all shown significant reductions of movement as well as a consistently high percentage of mask-wearing since the late summer, similar to the extent seen in Western Europe and approaching the extent seen in Asia.
I cannot recommend this article highly enough. This article should be a rallying point for our fight, on many, many fronts. This is Scott Atlas “setting the record straight”, and in the process, revealing the moral and logical failure of our intellectual institutions to be HONEST in their disagreements about COVID-19, and all that surrounds it.
But I’m not going to get into that right now. I want to talk about only ONE particular point, but it is one which TOTALLY CHANGES THE FIGHT.
It is my only criticism of Dr. Atlas on COVID-19. It is a point where, I believe, he should have been even MORE aggressive, seeking utter clarity, and fighting for the CONSERVATIVE POSITION of natural immunity.
So what was the point?
One of the things you will notice, if you read this piece, is that Dr. Atlas defends himself as having ACTUALLY SAID or having NOT ACTUALLY SAID certain things – including whether or not he said, either verbatim or in essence, that we should “let children catch the disease.” He denied – or perhaps it’s better to say he quibbled about – having said this.
And he’s right. Dr. Atlas was terribly misread, misquoted, and even maliciously slandered.
People always look weak when they very correctly say “I didn’t say that”, about something which may or may not be an implication of what they DID say, but the “optics” of weakness are beside the point.
The problem is much more fundamental. The problem is that the media uses this questioning technique to pin people down AWAY from where they should be. It is a brilliant deception, by which the media keeps its victims stating that – TRULY – they did not say the controversial but correct thing that they SHOULD HAVE SAID.
It’s a game. A form of misdirection. A con job. Intellectual whack-a-mole, where the TRUTH is the mole that should be a lion. A cunning use of “Alinsky fears” – “YOU DIDN’T SAY THAT, DID YOU?” – to keep an opponent away from that opponent’s most powerful argument.
And the proper answer to the question, quite literally, is “I didnt say that – BUT I SHOULD HAVE, AND HERE’S WHY.“
Under further questioning, “Yes. I’m saying that NOW.“
The technique of media misdirection away from an unstated power point is a brilliant kind of “forced inverted quasi-strawman”, which gets one to refute their own best implied argument, by backing off from the insinuated truth.
It’s ingenious, and it works. But it’s WRONG. It DEMANDS push-back.
Stated bluntly, I believe that Dr. Atlas SHOULD have admitted the following:
“YES – we want to let children risk catching COVID-19, because we have NO REASON to believe that vaccine immunity will be better than natural immunity, and every reason to believe that natural immunity will be SUPERIOR to vaccine immunity in every possible way, including both effectiveness and safety. It will be stronger and more durable immunity, almost without a doubt. And for children, it’s very likely to be safer than the vaccine. We need to think about the children’s future – not assuaging our own fears now.”
Once you SEE this – once you REALIZE how true this is – you realize that IT WAS A HILL WORTH DYING ON – AND NOBODY WOULD HAVE DIED.
There would have been a week-long firefight, where the media would attempt to “push it through” to “chickenpox parties” – just NO, YOU FUCKERS (we’d be rough, and it would be fun) – ending in the media pouting “well, you have no proof the new vaccines won’t be just as safe as current childhood immunizations”.
And you KNOW it would have been a “safe” bet that the new vaccines could not be that safe, but NOBODY HAD TO SAY THAT. Just wait for the facts on safety, but KNOW the following already:
(a) The actual HISTORY of the immune effectiveness of childhood diseases versus the LOWER effectiveness of our vaccines for them, says that natural immunity would be more effective – stronger and more durable.
(b) The actual HISTORY of all vaccines tells us that the low-hanging fruit has been more thoroughly picked already, and newer vaccines against harder targets, tend to be less safe, less effective, or both.
Do you see how EASY this would have been? We should have HELD THE LINE on letting children – our precious children – get the STRONGEST IMMUNITY POSSIBLE, AS SOON AND AS SAFELY AS KNOWINGLY POSSIBLE.
And not just that – THESE ARGUMENTS extend to many adults as well, who are at LOW RISK.
Trump insinuated more strongly on children’s natural immunity – as strongly and as often as he could – but we the scientists could have been stronger. Yeah, I will admit it – I’m a year late and trillions of dollars short, too.
THIS is why I say that Atlas was STRATEGICALLY correct – we needed to defend children – which he did. But TACTICALLY, we should have pushed further and deeper, to not just hold the ground on children, but to advance past it.
And that brings me to my next point.
*** 2 ***
Volunteers for Natural Immunity are Braver than the Vaccinated and Deserve Respect
Again, we see how the phony Fake News media, as a SHILL for med-pharma-socialism, the Democrat Party, and the CCP, has inverted the reality of the vaccinated vs. those who choose to risk the disease for the stronger immunity it imparts.
Play CHICKEN GAMES – get CHICKEN IMMUNITY.
And this extends to those of us who were merely VICTIMS of the disease, and didn’t even get a T-shirt saying:
“I HAD MULTIPLE COMORBIDITIES, I WENT THROUGH HYPOXIC HELL, AND ALL I GOT WAS STRONG IMMUNITY AND THIS DAMN T-SHIRT”.
This is a bit of a pet peeve of mine, actually, as a VICTIM of COVID-19, who is now holding, as my meager golden chump change, the ACTUAL STRONGER IMMUNITY.
I don’t WANT your weak and unpredictable vaccine. I got the disease and LIVED. I like my immunity. I pick my nose, I eat off other people’s plates, I don’t wear a mask, and life is just like before.
GO TO HELL, KAREN.
I have watched how SO MANY people, who understand their own health and their own RISKS, have felt FORCED to do the opposite of their natural inclination – to either get the vaccine or NOT get the vaccine – because of pressure by those around them, or worse yet, by highly conflicted stakeholders like Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates, highly conflicted organizations like CDC and WHO, and highly conflicted politicians like Andrew Cuomo and Gavin Newsom.
I have watched these same victimized people – including posters on this blog – dealing with what I can only describe as psychological and social ABUSE at the hands of the ant-like MINIONS of the conflicted socialist scum – victimization that should never happen in a free society.
The Karens and Kens and Chicken Littles who try to FORCE upon these victims their vaccine paranoia – and by vaccine paranoia I mean the absurd idea that “you have to get the vaccine to save ME – and GRANDMA” – I mean WHAT THE HELL – sorry – just CUT IT OUT, you BLUE SCUM. This is socialist propaganda, mediated through false and blame-shifted guilt-mongering, and it needs to be driven from American society with prejudice, because we don’t want this crap back.
Now – I’m not just blowing SMOKE that natural immunity to COVID-19 is QUALITY STUFF. You see, there is an excellent and respected scientific study on this, appearing in Science, funded by Fauci’s own rat operation, and touted by NIH, that you have not heard about, because our SHILL MEDIA didn’t want you to hear about it.
Yeah, think about that. An NIH-touted study that the media just missed. DARN!
The study says the natural immunity is mediated by multiple known and measured immunological mechanisms, and is still nice and strong even 8 months after recovery.
IN FACT, the NATURAL immunity is giving them HOPE that the vaccine immunity MIGHT BE just as good.
This work is not unique – similar early studies by other researchers were cited in the New York Times back in August of 2020.
You got that? Natural immunity is proven to last. Your vaccines which – as we know from over a century of experience, are almost invariably LESS immunizing than the disease – may last as long IF WE ARE LUCKY.
Yeah, I’m a little pissed about having had this disease, having permanent shortness of breath, and then being forced to wear a STUPID hypoxia-inducing mask, when I’m IMMUNE, and more immune than with your damn vaccine.
You want a link for the hypoxia part? I DID THE WORK MYSELF.
TL;DR – skip down to “Crucial Experiment” and read how you can prove to yourself that masks cause real and measurable cognitive decline that lasts long after you unmask. NPR and other leftists who say masks don’t affect you and your children are LYING. LOOK, it’s time to be blunt. Senility – Cognitive Decline – …
BYE, KAREN! You hear me? And take your damn masks and vaccination passports with you!
I’m IMMUNE, you BITCH!!!
Seriously, having a population of CONTROLS is smart science, and if Fauci were a better and more honest scientist, he would have gotten out ahead on that long ago, and ironically would have gotten more of the right people vaccinated, but – well – they’re not in this for any of their stated reasons.
*** 3 ***
In The Game of Mutant Variant Fear-Mongering Chicken, Fauci Swerved
Have you noticed how there is SO MUCH BTFO on the COVID-19 “variants” thing, lately?
It’s like all of a sudden, nobody wants to talk about variant doom. Indeed – THIS article….
…..was news released on March 30, and Anthony Fauci is even LISTED as “available for comment” on it!
There’s a reason.
Playing Chicken With The Truth Is Always Dangerous
Now, it is WAY TOO EARLY for a non-epidemiologist like me to opine as to which side of the “variants” infinity-hedron is most correct, but I’m here to tell you that THIS THING’S GOT SIDES OUT THE WAZOO, and yet the number of sides is dropping electric-razor fast, and it will be painful when whatever remains passes through Fauci’s rear end as the final truth, whatever that truth may be.
On the one side, there is, and has been, from the very beginning, evidence that “variants” are real, but not a big problem.
But did MUH VARIANTS suddenly get worse?
Doctor Rand Paul brilliantly but subtle as a ship-destroying laser through a window CALLED OUT the author of the Fauci Virus on his role in scaremongering against persistent realities, and I will admit to having ridden down on his bomb with some of my own contribution to the massive BTFO which ensued.
Introduction You have GOT to see the video I’m going to show you. It’s not just what they’re talking about. It’s WHERE IT LEADS. Most of the people who watch Rand Paul go after Fauci here, are concentrating on MASKS, because that is the TOP LAYER of the argument. But THAT is the small potatoes. …
And yeah, I could not help but notice WHERE the suddenly bad variant problem got suddenly bad…..
But before that, the “variants” problem turned even further South for the Branch Covidians, when yet another scientist – this one uncomfortably close to Bill Gates – noted that the “variants problem” could mean vaccines were a huge backfire all along – but without going “full Marek”. And this dude went “full chicken” against the vaccine establishment, with that little medical mafia punk in the driver’s seat.
In this open letter I am appealing to the @WHO and all stakeholders involved, no matter their conviction, to immediately declare such action as THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY OF INTERNATIONAL CONCERN. Please read and share: https://t.co/0Fupw9JInP#COVID19pic.twitter.com/I24mSjpVKM
Not trusting Twitter, let’s just save that tweet….
…..as well as his open letter…..
He also did a nice interview explaining his warnings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtHfI00D_s4
That interview was then re-explained by Del Bigtree.
What you are seeing RIGHT NOW is how politicized the science has become, to where this guy has to go on TWITTER, or get picked up by YouTubers and podcasters, to call into the open what should be a big open question in science.
The game is normally – if you want to keep your job in science – to massage one’s own message of truly perceived truth toward the media’s badly managed but persistently publicly perceived mainstream “bag of somebody’s intentional errors” so as not to lose the credibility needed to stay in the game. It’s sick, it’s wrong, and it’s ugly. But honestly, you have to be RETIRED in science to speak what you’re really thinking, any more. The MEDIA controls too much of it.
Watch PBS science these days, and you realize it’s all about DAMAGE CONTROL.
That’s a good thing, compared to what it was. It means WE’RE WINNING. Slowly, painfully, and at great cost, but we’re beating these bastards back.
REVEL in the coast-down, brothers and sisters.
https://youtu.be/3xOkF0PtsTE
“YOUR LAPTOPS ARE *GROUNDED*!!! ok not really.” “SIR!!!”
*** 4 ***
Vaccine Passports Are a Gift to Patriots
I’m just gonna keep this short. Vaccine Passports are going to create a rebellion like you’ve never seen. They’re the best enemy overreach since Obama made the mistake of including “Bibles” with “guns” in his “bitter clingers” statement.
Here I am – a recoveree – science NOW on my side PERSONALLY to keep my natural immunity – science IN THE FUTURE (if it were honest) on my side to take a risk and KEEP me as a CONTROL going forward, even though I’d probably tolerate the vaccine no problems – even idiot-build Moderna 1.0……
…..meaning I’m volunteering to catch “in the wild” version COVID-25 just to make the science better…..
……and yet the statists, dumb as oxen, just keep pushing the forced vaccination stupidity.
Because it’s not about the disease. It’a about control.
Just keep overreachin’, guys. I never thought they’d set me up to win SCIENCE MINDS.
And yet HERE we are…..
*** 5 ***
Treating SARS-CoV-2 as Flying Snakebite Solves Most Mysteries of the Disease and the Vaccines
I’m just being cute there. Here is a better title, probably acceptable to many scientific journals.
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Analogies to Components of Crotalid Snake Venoms and Application to Treatment of COVID-19 and Vaccine Adverse Effects
The first title is so very “Q Tree”. The second is more like Wolf in his former life. The word “analogies” is pushing it, editorially, but that can be played properly in the body of the paper, baiting in a reviewer-pleasing disclaimer on limiting the extent of the comparison, and all is good.
I’m not sure when I first realized that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (hereafter “SP”) bore a remarkable resemblance to hemotoxic snake venoms, but I am thinking it was after I realized that the preponderance of vaccine side effects in the clinical trials were either hematological, cardiovascular, similar to the disease itself, or all of the above.
Analogies are frequently crap, and they’re never perfect BECAUSE they’re analogies, but they’re still the best beater screwdrivers ever to start fixing stuff in Scienceville. When Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell saved millions of elderly lives from Chinese/Deep State duplicity by a limited but very useful comparison of COVID-19 hypoxia to high-altitude sickness, and realized we were doing vents seriously wrong and killing people, God smiled, wept, and said “The fallacy of fallacy – this guy gets it.”
What follows isn’t anywhere near that good, but it gave me an opportunity to retweet Doc Cameron’s angelic post in a form Twitter and YouTube can never take down.
The idea that side-effects of the C19 vaccines might be similar to the disease itself is just baseline reasoning. The main active vaccine component of ALL of the vaccines for COVID-19 is either a stabilized spike protein (SSP), or the genetic instructions thereof (in mRNA or DNA). SSP is basically SP with a very few amino acids or corresponding genetic sequences replaced to make the SSP molecule hold its shape in the most immunizing form reminiscent of SP. This is done because natural SP changes shape drastically upon interaction with cellular receptors to which it attaches, This vaccine-undesirable behavior assists virus entry, and also suppresses the opportunity to gain immunity by antibodies reacting to the “normal” unchanged form. Evolution. Beautiful stuff. GOD-MODE reality. Antibodies react to the CHANGED form instead, and become fairly useless. Life gets Lagrangian, and we’re in the pipe, 5:5.
Once you realize how “out of the pipe” that movie really is, you start seeing some really interesting curves. But what the heck, it’s Good Friday. It’s all good.
Back to the story. Snakes and all.
Wikipedia denigrates (or more charitably overlooks) a guy named Bill Haast to obscurity as a proponent/explorer of mitrhidatism, which bluntly means the near-if-not-actual fallacy of taking poison to gain immunity to it, but in my opinion Haast was really one of the first people to explore in a serious way not only the general mithridatism-vaccination continuum, but even more specifically the fact that small molecules don’t provide enough mathematical possibility for organisms to beat poisoning (yet – wink), but proteins do, and thus life as a multi-faceted thing which makes and breaks protein poisoning as a tactic, can bargain and negotiate back to the beautiful place where it works for all beasts, great or small.
Come again?
Sure.
Bill Haast was injecting himself with snake venoms, which don’t contain fluoride, strychnine, tetrodotoxin, dioxin, cocaine, meth, lead, osmium tetroxide, or a lot of other small-molecule poisons, but DO contain, as their most interesting and active components, PROTEINS, which do in fact lend themselves to mithridatism – whoops – I meant vaccination.
Proteins which do things remarkably similar to the SPIKE PROTEIN of SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Once you see this, almost every aspect of reality underlying Branch Covidianism can be explained logically, which I find wonderfully ironic, coming from a Branch Qvidian who actually believes in God as a useful tool of deep protoscience, because a universe that gunpoints everybody toward where Moses went on TRUTH without guns – oh, man – what a ride. I’ll take more Top Macguffin with my popcorn, please!
I’ve pontificated intermittently and increasingly on the utility of looking at spike protein through the snake venom looking glass, which is not meant to keep people from vaccinating, but rather to show people how some of the most useful scientists – like Bill Haast and some guy named Faraday – are a deep part of the beauty, and if your child out there is some little girl who likes snakes and spiders, don’t change her sex – just LET HER. Science doesn’t have to be neat. It just has to be RIGHT.
I will include a few links to those pontifications as I find them, but here is one for starters.
Maybe I won’t find the other links. Why? I’m going to throw a freebie to the “natsec” people I just burned. If instead of “going after” QAnons and other “extremists” you did something incredibly useful, and got all Bob Massie and SciFinder on the future of populist good, you might do more good than harm.
*** 6 ***
Did Fauxi and Birx Hide Beta Coronavirus Prevalence and Diagnostic Cross-Over in Antibody Tests, and Non-Infective Coronavirus Genetic Incorporation, To Assist PCR-Based Fragment Fraud?
I think it’s time to ask.
One of the biggest mysteries / non-mysteries of this whole COVID thing has been the seeming disappearance of ACTUAL INFLUENZA from epidemiological statistics, as well as the prior 4 weak beta coronaviruses, almost all being not just displaced, but REPLACED by COVID-19.
There are “good” explanations for this, but to be frank, they support the Branch Covidian narrative a little too much for my tastes. Have a listen. This dude is WAAAAAAY SOOOOTHING to listen to.
You gettin’ that same vibe?
The fact is, viruses DO COMPETE, and that competition activates our defenses, making the competition even more severe, so one virus DOES help protect you from the next. But that doesn’t make ALL the funny business I’m seeing go away.
Now, it’s a bit ironic that this guy’s same reasoning about interferons from one infection preventing others – which also happens during vaccination (as taught to me by Dr. Shiva), is EXACTLY why you should never get two vaccines at the same time, in my careful opinion, because I get the feeling that this dude would check the PC position on multi-vax before assuring us that “Medicine Knows Best(TM)” and “don’t worry about multiple vaccines – your vaccines have all been tested and are found to be safe, blah, blah, blah.”
But there is something that even more fundamentally bothers me about his explanation. Viral interference only works by something ACTUALLY infecting people, who then become protected against THAT virus and OTHER THINGS. The only non-infected people who are protected beyond that, are protected by herd immunity.
Stated differently, if there are enough infections with COVID-19 in the population to STOP THE FLU (that’s how it works – RIIIIIGHT?) then surely there must be enough infections with COVID-19 to be preventing COVID-19 itself from finding new hosts by that same mathematical protection, too – RIIIIIGHT? Which is herd immunity. That should be showing up BIGLY.
But we’re not at COVID-19 herd immunity yet. And yet FLU doesn’t seem to be standing a chance.
You seein’ that? This is, quite bluntly, “weird kinetics”. Something very fishy about this excuse. I’m not exactly buying it – especially when the “kinetics” of faulty testing seem to explain things better, as we will see.
I am buying that SOME viral interference is likely going on, but his whole reassuring spiel just seems a bit too pat. Certain meters are just pegging out, and they’re not the good meters.
If you read the comments on this video, there is evidence that (1) many places are no longer even testing for flu, which very much supports where I’m going, but (2) supposedly, in some that HAVE tested for both COVID and flu, influenza has basically disappeared.
Sure, the absolute MESS that CDC created in both testing and statistics is not making me trust all the numbers, so let’s just say that viral interference is VERY LIKELY. But is it responsible for everything?
I have even thought – and I simply CANNOT dismiss this hypothesis – that maybe – just MAYBE – the flu vaccine was working a LOT better than these people were letting on, but that the argument in Branch Covidian clerical circles was “We can’t let off on the mantras of MOAR COMPLIANCE, or we’ll lose ground.”
What this would have meant is that ACTUAL endemic levels of influenza are far lower than we the public thought, because the CDC was pushing for vaccine compliance at levels that would solve flu at its frequently epidemic levels. Combine a different bug grabbing the golden epidemic ring with people still taking their flu shots for epidemic influenza levels, and influenza was just beaten down silly.
Which is viral interference PLUS flu vaccination “over-compliance” – basically vaccination that was actually working as a public health response, even with MANY people not taking it, but no, they have to always lie to us about things NOT working to get more compliance. Flu vaccine “failure because of YOU” is the white guilt of public health. Now coronavirus vaccine “failure because of YOU” is the Christian guilt to go with it.
Bastards. It’s not about solving the problem. It’s about CONTROL.
But it gets WORSE.
Enter TWO very interesting phenomena that were EXPOSED and oddly not anticipated.
(a) Antibody Testing Yahooism and Crossover from Other Coronaviruses
One of the things that really bothered me about American antibody testing was that the CDC loaded those numbers into normal infected “cases”. They didn’t count antibody positives as a separate kind of case, which would have made sense. They actually added them to regular infection case numbers, along with the numbers from the (already bad) PCR test.
But it got worse. We couldn’t even trust the antibody tests to give us good numbers on COVID-19, because once they arrived, there was a disclaimer that they might – or as was verified later WERE – picking up antibodies from prior infections with OTHER, NON-COVID-19, coronaviruses.
Holy CRAP.
And then, of course, this gets worse because we later learn that people are over-cooking PCR tests everywhere, trying to get bigger COVID numbers, or just because they never calibrated their machines.
Science! Yeah – it really works WHEN YOU ACTUALLY DO IT.
When you fake it? Not so much.
(b) Benign but Test-Significant Genetic Incorporation of SARS-CoV-2 and Possibly Other Coronaviruses
I have a VERY hard time believing that Anthony Fauci didn’t KNOW “coronavirus fragment replay from genetic incorporation” was either a FACT, or at least a possibility. OK – I’ll be more blunt. I think he KNEW, and kept it as an ACE IN THE HOLE.
Now I could explain this one very quickly, too, but I think people need the full monty here, because we have been having a lot of debates on genetic incorporation, and this is a point that is hotly debated with Branch Covidians. So I’m going to take this one very slowly. You may learn something.
One of the most “fun facts” – I thought – was the idea that our genomes, and the genomes of most life on this planet, seem to be literally chock full of VIRAL TRASH, accumulated over eons. It’s almost like that principle that everybody has royalty SOMEWHERE in their family tree, except it would be more like double digit percentages of royalty. I mean, “WHUUUUUUT? You KIDDING me?”
So just keep that in mind as we go forward. There is viral TRASH filling up our genomes. It must have gotten there somehow. I’ll bet it was VIRUSES!
“VIRUSES DID WHUUUUT?”
So – I walk into this whole COVID thing, and the very first vaccine that gets into the news, I go digging on it, and it not only turns out to be a “Bill Gates vaccine” [HINT – almost ALL the top vaccines have Bill Gates funding] – it turns out it’s a DNA vaccine.
Yup. Those little circles are DNA.
So I’m just a stupid outsider with too much knowledge to keep from asking stupidly annoying questions, so I ask one, like “well, if these are genetic vaccines, which are supposed to have all the “genetic advantages” of viruses as genetic vectors, what happens if they actually DO act like viruses and leave JUNK?
It’s NOT an unreasonable question, and this not only gives me an opportunity to explain WHY – it gives me a opportunity to deal with multiple types of annoying propaganda very quickly.
The first vaccines (as we know them) were ACTUALLY VIRUSES. That’s why they’re called “vaccines“, and vaccination is called “vaccination” – because it started with infection with cowpox, which eventually “gained function” (meaning mutations that make a virus “better” at something) to become the vaccinia virus. [This is disregarding the likely fact that part of that gain of function may have been humans foisting a sequence quantum jump to the very similar horsepox, already a natural GOF.] So in a WAY, we treated smallpox with one of the very first “DNA vaccines” [MASSIVE QUOTES] – that being an actual live virus.
Let me drill down on that a bit.
Viruses are just DNA or RNA in a protein wrapper which is coded for by the DNA or RNA, along with any other proteins useful in the HACK that viruses are.
THUS, any vaccine which uses “live” RNA or DNA which THEN creates protein antigens which prompt your immunity, is essentially (but not precisely, in the way we ACTUALLY talk about them) an RNA or DNA vaccine. If it’s weakened or dead virus, and it’s only the PROTEIN of the shell of the virus that’s activating your immunity, then it’s NOT “in essence” an RNA or DNA vaccine.
Let me say this in another way that is more direct in dealing with certain propaganda.
It is kinda silly (to me) to say that mRNA vaccines and DNA vaccines are not vaccines, because of the genetic angle, when they actually get back to the principles of the ORIGINAL vaccines, which used the DNA or RNA of a live or attenuated virus to CREATE ANTIGEN.
I’m basically saying that not only do mRNA and DNA vaccines fit the very general and beautiful MODERNCDC definition of a vaccine – they very closely hew to the OLDEST definition of a vaccine from GEORGE WASHINGTON’S TIME – thanks to the dependence on mRNA or DNA.
I mean, DAYUM – the history of science is SO FREAKIN’ COOL. Stuff just COMES BACK INTO FASHION.
It was only later, when we used dead viruses, or synthetic recombinant proteins and glycoproteins from the viruses, that we actually GOT AWAY from using vaccines that relied on DNA or RNA, and were INSTEAD using the final protein itself.
Now if you want to go on saying “mRNA and DNA vaccines are not vaccines – they’re gene therapy” – I will make you one final offer of compromise – could we agree that they’re BOTH? Because if you can agree to that, you’re going to love an upcoming section of this post.
OK – I’m done with that point for now.
ANYWAY, what I found in this COVID thing, is that NOBODY in Big Pharma or Big Vaccines (like Bill Gates) really wanted to talk about the genetic aspects of these vaccines. There are multiple reasons, some obvious, some not. The genetic stuff is simply controversial.
And THAT is useful, if you don’t want people talking about it FOR OTHER REASONS – like making a scam work.
Now I was talking to Duchess, Grandma, Cthulhu and Scott, about Fauci, in the comments HERE, when Cthulhu said THIS:
“The thing is, this isn’t Fauci’s first rodeo. He spectacularly failed during the AIDS crisis, forever calling for vaccines that never happened — and pooh-poohing therapeutics, thereby sentencing many thousands to a miserable death.“
And then Scott said THIS:
“What if he’s not ‘failing’ at all? What if he is accomplishing exactly what he intends to accomplish, it’s just not what you think he’s trying to accomplish?”
To which I responed like THIS:
“Yeah, that is the key. You nailed it. Fauci likely had his eyes on a vaccine that could be given to everybody, which would allow gene therapy to commence. OMG, that’s it. You solved the crime! THIS PAPER gives away the game!!!” https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1.full
I urge you to read that whole section, starting HERE.
Now – my speculation right there, on Fauci’s motive being gene therapy, is just pure speculation, since I don’t yet even have any idea what KIND of vaccine he was interested in for AIDS, but I think that gene therapy is at least PART of the motive of almost everybody in the Big Pharma push for COVID-19 vaccines right now. This is not a hard bet. Wait for the next section of this post.
Short version – a good SCAM to force gene therapy on society targets the “red up arrow” “special” feedback to DNA in the following image, doing so accidentally, which both HIV and (apparently) coronavirus(es) do.
LOL. Why, what a coincidence.
However, more relevant to the question of this section, RE the “fragment fraud”, is the idea that Fauci has now shown TWICE an extreme interest in vaccines for viruses which incorporate to some significant extent into the genome. This means that a person infected with them, is basically STUCK as a positive test, if you scam things properly using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This isn’t the same motive as genetic therapy, but it COULD be a bonus.
SO….. was PCR identified as an abusable all along? Hold my wine, I’m getting Kary Mullis on the science-radar-love phone without resorting to dark means (meaning I did a great web search and found this real treat for you). Kary always said it WAS being abused. And while I suggested a maybe kinda “well, at least try this” fix for that on these pages a while back, I imagine I was far from the first to suggest it.
OK – let’s back up AGAIN. In my response to Scott, I cited THIS paper, submitted December 14, 2020.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
Summary
Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery, yet these patients most commonly are non-infectious1–14. Here we investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for PCR-positive tests. In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome. To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration, we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients. This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication.
This paper is showing that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is incorporating into the genetics of people, and it potentially explains why some people shed test-triggering virus protein and/or protein FRAGMENTS for a long time.
But what is so cool about this work is how politically incorrect that science was at the time, and still is, precisely because the TRUTH might be ammunition for the antivaxxers! HA. What scientific WEAKLINGS. Follow that link above to the paper, or to a Science article discussing it, and you will see – there were Branch Covidian clergy already thinking there needed to be an Inquisition, and maybe suppression of this work which might lead people into error. Oh, Ann Coulter was so right – it’s a RELIGION.
So – how does this ALL come together? Let’s replay the title of this section, to bring all the pieces together.
Did Fauxi and Birx Hide Beta Coronavirus Prevalence and Diagnostic Cross-Over in Antibody Tests, and Non-Infective Coronavirus Genetic Incorporation, To Assist PCR-Based Fragment Fraud?
The pieces of the scam are:
lots of pre-COVID coronaviruses – more than people realize
influenza baseline being effectively beaten down by “hidden” vaccine over-compliance
early release of COVID-19 which was denied by the media, WHO and the CDC
cross-over in testing by (maybe) influenza and/or (mostly) pre-COVID coronaviruses
counting antibody tests as actual cases NOW
COVID-19 definitely engaging in “fragment genetic incorporation”
other coronaviruses likely doing the same
PCR tests being run at default cycles
PCR tests being run at too many cycles “to be safe”
PCR tests for COVID-19 being run either FIRST or EXCLUSIVELY
PCR tests picking up recoverees shedding fragments in an accelerating curve
antibody tests picking up other coronaviruses and recoverees b/c fragments
If you look at this honestly, the whole thing is TIPPED to giving too high of numbers, and the only thing that will get good numbers is scientific discipline, pushing back AWAY from a positive diagnosis. One has to talk BACK to borderline diagnosis and say NO.
The PROBLEM with that is that FEAR pushes people to ERR on the side of CAUTION and say MAYBE or YES – this is a case – resulting in borderline tests being run for extra PCR cycles, or cycle settings being WAY too high, or people just calling it a case to be safe.
The psychology sabotaged this thing from the beginning. And I think people KNEW THIS.
And yet, they clearly didn’t have HIGH ENOUGH numbers to guarantee removal of Trump (the obvious objective), so CUOMO and his henchmen and henchladies conspired to push the numbers even HIGHER in nursing homes.
WHATEVER.
The real point is this. The TESTING PARADIGM was FLAWED, and people who knew better did NOT try to get accurate numbers by pushing back on known defects or risks in the testing – they tried to get BIGGER numbers by PRETENDING they didn’t know.
Yeah.
Democrats. Like Fauci and Birx.
*** 7 ***
No Matter What One Calls The COVID-19 Vaccines, mRNA and DNA Vaccines are Now an Open Gateway to Gene Therapy and Genetic Modification
This is where I come out of the closet on transhumanism. Bluntly, I’m not TOTALLY opposed to ideas of advancing technology. I just think we have to be HONEST and RESPONSIBLE TO THE PEOPLE in letting technology advance.
There is a continuum on “trans”, with transbutchery on one end, and transfiguration on the other end, but I refuse to call everything in the middle “bad”, because God implements in the real world, and building the Kingdom of Heaven means HERE and NOW.
Yup. I listened to too many radio preachers. I spoke to too many Christians and Jews and Buddhists on the opposite end of the world and everywhere in between, thanks to technology. MAXWELL and FARADAY helped save my ass. And TESLA says there’s MOAR, and it can be a GOOD THING.
One of the things I did at the beginning of this COVID ride, when I saw that everybody was HIDING the fact that we were rolling out genetic vaccines with minimal disclosure on the genetic part, clearly as a way of keeping the anti-vax response from going off the charts too soon, was to challenge everybody on Twitter with rather neutral mini-disclosures, as well as polls that would help everybody ‘fess up to reality. On the one side, it’s important to “ease out” the truth, but on the other side, it’s just important to get the truth out AT ALL.
So I got GREAT responses on my various polls including (1) would you take a BILL GATES VACCINE and (2) would you take a TRUMP VACCINE, with TRUST turning out to be a big thing – up to a point. But what people may not have noticed, was my craftily mixing in there, as much as I could, the more real ideas of mRNA and DNA vaccines.
Now I’m rightfully leery of mRNA and DNA vaccines simply as an honest scientist who knows MISTAKES HAVE BEEN MADE in the past, and now is no time for that to stop, in our much more finite universe than some that are possible. Yes, it’s a small risk, given the larger truth that…..
old-school vaccines that use live viruses, are *literal* DNA and RNA vaccines, if you get right down to it
……but the smaller truth is, even the Moderna scientists pre-quibbled on their own mRNA technology, with jazz hands aloft, saying as obscurely as they could, in one of their first vaccine papers, “BUH BUH BUH we warned you on long-range side effects as unknowns”, which are still a small but real risk, and that risk being IN ADDITION TO any dishonesty in Big Pharma, which of course NEVER happens.
Yup. Nobody can ever beat Scott467’s point that dishonesty by the industry AUTOMATICALLY JUSTIFIES vaccine refusal. Sorry – it just DOES. I don’t want to say YOU DAMN IDIOTS, but YOU DAMN IDIOTS.
But here is my new freebie to avoid the next debacle:
We’re CONTROLS, you idiots
Yup. Science needs controls. Vaccine refusers ARE CONTROLS – totally voluntary – fully informed – and just imagine if somebody smart came out and back-talked the idiot media and said:
“We will need controls – we’re good with the people who don’t want to vaccinate – they’ll help”
And when Blubbering Acosta and Sneering Welker push back in outraged tones, that person might say:
“Look, vaccine technology is accelerating – and it has to, and will, no matter what. Mistakes will be made along the way, but honesty fixes them as soon as possible. Keeping technology adoption voluntary is one of the single most important and best absolutes we can adhere to, as a nation and as a planet, for a bright future – just like free speech, just like independent science, just like respecting religious freedom – that can help us steer straight and not miss the mark. The press needs to stop being SCOLDS if they want to win back the hearts and minds they lost through helping their favorite party and candidates politicize science.”
Then, just let chattering, argumentative, toes-bouncing-on-fancy-chairs, press stupidity prove itself right there.
See? THAT is how to deal with advancing tech. VOLUNTARILY and HONESTLY.
OK, I really will get back to the subject.
How do I KNOW that they’re irreversibly gatewaying from these genetic vaccines to gene therapy and genetic modification (hereafter “genvac”, “genvax”, “genther”, “genmod” and the like)?
TWO WAYS.
(1) CRISPR-based vaccines – which are straight-up genvax by genmod – are waiting EXCITEDLY in the wings.
(2) The Bidenoids at Chemical & Engineering News (C&EN) couldn’t wait for the COVID-19 bodies to cool, before they started getting a serious Bidenish jones for GenVac‘s sexy sister GenTher and her crew of transhuman beauties.
And yeah – them Bidenoids are getting CRISPR and CRISPRER.
If you see CRISPR or CRISPR-Cas9 (explanatory infographic below) cited anywhere NEAR a vaccine, then you are talking actual, straight-up, genetic modification – GENMOD – and anybody who is denying that is LYING. (Yes, sabotagedCRISPR-Cas9 can be used for gene BLOCKING – see later.)
CRISPR – and any other future tools like it – are used to splice genes. Remember that old term, “gene-splicing”, that seems to have disappeared for some reason?
Yeah – that is where we are.
If you read this article, you will see that, in early 2019, gene-splicing vaccines were NOT that far away, and were being openly tested on animals. YOU KNOW they had already been tested on humans, but – hey – you can’t say it, even though you know it’s true.
So where does Chemical & Engineering News figure into this?
C&EN was basically taken over by climate commies in the first stage of subversion of American science to the climate agenda and eventually “Demmunism”. Journalists! From there, it only got worse. As one can expect, during the Trump administration, every single issue was a protest against the Trump presidency. Worse still, during COVID insanity, cubic miles of water were carried for the COVID commies and the ChiNazis, to whom the American Chemical Society seems somehow eternally indebted, just like everybody else in science.
Scientists are such chumps.
But when Joe Biden “won”, C&EN had an orgasm, and THAT issue is a beauty.
Water-carrying in this issue includes (and I go into self-discrediting territory here to make a TIP to the right people):
justify top-down government control of science
bring back those ChiCom and other student spies
double-down on Earth abiotic life boot-up to distract from [COUGH]
COVID, COVID, COVID!
back-handed shill for Indian dependence on China for chemicals
Black Chemists Matter! (They do, but damn it, can you be less obvious?)
We love Joe Biden and President Harris!
Military must be “greener”!!!
VARIANTS! (But still, this is excellent reporting.)
MOAR COVID!
Pollutant cooling overstated, so GLOBAL WARMING IS BACK!!!
Neutral article on drug reshoring (I’m impressed!)
Biden HFC Treaty!
Biden scientific integrity guidelines ordered! (you may puke now)
Biden reviews everything about EPA! Hooray!
Massive fraudulent scientific paper bust! (Chinese authors not mentioned, of course)
[Black] Communities push for say in environmental regulations!
Will Biden and Harris outlaw common pesticide on the ropes? Please? Hooray!
This was the warning shot, right here. It was the LAST item in the “Biden-Harris Love-Fest”, but it is clearly what’s for dinner.
BIDEN-APPROVED GENE-EDITING IS COMING. That’s the message.
But what follows, interestingly, is a bit different.
What’s interesting here is that this food animal genmod stuff was being SHIFTED from FDA to USDA, and this shift was being pushed by the TRUMP administration and Sonny Perdue, against the wishes of FDA. So it may not be what it appears to be, and the TITLE here may amount to some AOC lipstick on some pork that the Bidenistas don’t actually like.
It seems to have something to do with the meat market and keeping up with other nations. Could that mean China? Complicated business. Do I trust Sonny Perdue? Yes. Do I trust Trump? Yes. Whatever they did here, I trust, but I’d love to know the deep story. Maybe Gail has some insight here.
GENTHER doesn’t make an appearance until the March issues, but DEEP LIFEMOD gets a shocker cover on the very next issue, if you know what to look for.
The message here is two layers. The ostensible top layer is pretty much like what Kary Mullis intended with PCR – in this case, “let’s use ribosomes to make stuff!” That isn’t a particularly scary message – that’s pretty much what any kind of agriculture is – we’re just taking control of it down at the ribosome to “extend things”. But the hidden message layer is just as sneaky and cunning as what they DID with Kary’s baby – to abuse it for “outcome-controllable” diagnosis and even politics, in evicting Trump.
“Retooling the ribosome” is what you do to create life that’s – well – different. Want to increase the alphabet of life? To go from the planet-portable ASCII of our current amino acids and nucleic acids to EXTENDED ASCII – and maybe even someday UNICODE? This is the key step.
We are KNOCKING AT THE DOOR. And you can’t do nothin’ about it.
That is the psychological message of this issue of C&EN.
So – even though this is nothing explicit – nothing to be worried about right now – perfect demonstration of the difference between me and Dr. Carrie Madeij on how we’re reacting to transhumanism – I still agree with her that we need to WAKE UP on these topics, where others are going with careless abandon, thanks to DOMINION voting systems and their knowingly, intentionally bad security choices.
Let’s compare the deception here to climate change.
One of the problems with what I call phony anthropolitical global warming is that “solving” it doesn’t really solve OUR immediate problem of ice ages and intermittent dangerous global cooling (the reality), but it DOES solve a future problem of long-term SOLAR warming on this planet. Whether that’s OUR problem or “somebody else’s”, it’s not a problem NOW. Thus, it seems that the problem of global warming is duplicitously framed.
Even if the deception is beneficial as in – people with billions of years of planetary experience think an ice age now is helpful against the background of eventual heat death – the societal costs of the LIES are adding up.
Likewise, I feel that the push to advance genetic modification of humans is duplicitously framed. The phony pandemic – the push to GENVAX – the denial of hydroxychloroquine – it all STINKS.
Back to C&EN.
In the March 1, 2021 issue, there is coverage of an mRNA drug company, Orna Therapeutics, being launched with an 80 million dollar war chest – which is a buck for every year of Nancy Pelosi’s life, per MTG. This venture is being spun off of MIT research.
It is explicitly stated that this mRNA therapeutics venture is going forward because of the success of the SCAMDEMIC vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna. And who is investing in Orna? A whole bunch of drug companies, including Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis.
TOLDJASO.
Big Pharma GOT RID OF TRUMP and forced a human experiment on all of humanity, while using leftist politics to force buy-in by as many people as possible. WE CAN SEE IT.
Just because they could do it, does not make it right. SHAME on them all, including the CHEERLEADERS at Chemical & Engineering News. SHAME.
Now, jump forward to the March 15, 2021 issue, and we tie this all together with CRISPR.
Gene therapy relieves pain in mice CRISPR-based method could treat chronic pain
What scientists at Navega Therapeutics did here was actually very cool – they used a BAD version of CRISPR-Cas9 which doesn’t properly snip the gene for a pain receptor, but instead PARKS there and blocks it, to prevent pain in mice. They didn’t do “gene splicing” – they did “gene blocking”. They used adenoviral vectors – kinda like the Johnson+Johnson and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines – to “send in the clowns”. AND IT WORKED. As an independent pain researcher said of the whole thing, “super-exciting paper”.
This is pure research, and it’s actually very cool, and even morally acceptable to people who don’t believe in gene tampering per se but – yeah – it’s all moving forward because they know they can use it on people because of the SCAMDEMIC. The next stop on this one is NON-HUMAN PRIMATES.
Bottom line:Gene therapy is here – it’s coming to your doc soon – and you can’t stop it. Not only that – if you resist too much, they will launch a phony sociobiological event to try to MAKE you take whatever they want.
Welcome to “The Biden-Harris administration – How the new leaders aim to restore science to US governance”, as stated on the February 1, 2021 cover of Chemical & Engineering News.
It’s going to be an interesting ride, no matter what.
Conclusions
I could end on that SOUR NOTE of Branch Covidian and ChiNazi end-zone dancing at COVID-19 half-time. We could all remain AT their game, which is really IN their game. We could run out for CRISPR doughnuts and GMO Pork Sausage and come back to our socially distant seats for the Cuban National Anthem and the “accidental” wardrobe malfunctions.
Or we could get up, walk out, embrace a life which truly respects nature, the universe, and TRUTH ITSELF. We could read some books and magazines, gain awareness of what is happening, and TAKE CONTROL OF THE WHOLE DAMN STADIUM from afar. Maybe not right away, but sooner than we think.
I believe that others have gone where we are now, and sympathize with our plight. Likewise, I believe that higher powers serve THE LORD, and in doing so, will not abandon us to the Evil One.
Freedom, independence, justice and TRUTH are all worth fighting for – and we are NOT ALONE in wanting them.
No matter WHAT you think of any of this technology, or the vaccines…..
I AM WITH YOU.
If I would defend your right to SAY anything, would I not defend your right to LIVE as you wish?
COUNT ON IT.
We will bring SANITY and MORALITY back to this country, and we will do it sooner than many think.
